alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.69


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO LICENSE AGREEMENT


 


This First Amendment (the "First Amendment") is made effective as of January 25, 2016 (the "First Amendment Effective Date"), to amend the License Agreement entered into by and between The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology ("Wistar") and OncoCyte Corporation ("OncoCyte"), dated January 22,2016 (the "License Agreement").


 


PURPOSE OF AMENDMENT


 


The sole purpose of this First Amendment is to correct the numbering found within Section 1.24 of the License Agreement. Section 1.24 shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


 


1.24        "Licensed Product(s)" means:


 


(i)         on a country-by-country basis, any product, the making, using, selling, offering for sale, or importing of which product in the country in question would (without the license granted under this Agreement) infringe at least one pending Valid Claim (were it to have issued) or issued Valid Claim of the Licensed Patents in that country;


 


(ii)        on a country-by-country basis, any service, process or method, the performing or providing of which process or method in the country in question would (without the license granted under the Agreement) infringe at least one pending Valid Claim (were it to have issued) or issued Valid Claim of the Licensed Patents in that country; and


 


(iii)       any product or process that is not covered by the foregoing clauses (i) or (ii), but that incorporates or is made, identified, developed, optimized, characterized, selected, derived or determined to have utility, in whole or in part, by the use or modification of (a) any Licensed Patent or any technology or invention covered thereby, (b) any Technical Information or (d) any Licensed Product covered by the foregoing clauses (i) or (ii).


 


This First Amendment shall be binding upon both parties as of the First Amendment Effective Date.


 


All capitalized terms not expressly defined herein shall have the same meanings assigned to them in the License Agreement. Except as expressly amended or modified herein, all other terms and conditions of the License Agreement remain in full force and effect.


 


This First Amendment shall be construed by and enforced in accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania without regard to its principles of conflicts of law.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this First Amendment to be executed by their duly authorized representatives as of the First Amendment Effective Date.


 





	
THE WISTAR INSTITUTE OF ANATOMY AND BIOLOGY

	
ONCOCYTE CORPORATION


		
 

		
 


	
By:

	/s/ Heather Steinman	
By:

	/s/ WILLIAM ANNETT
	Name:	
Heather Steinman

	Name:	
WILLIAM ANNETT


	Title: 	
Vice President for Business Development & 


Executive Director, Technology Transfer

	
Title:

	
C E O


	 	
The Wistar Institute

	Date:	
JANUARY 25, 2016


	
Date:

	January 25, 2016
III 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. CON. RES. 48 

Expressing support for the designation of October 28, 2020, as ‘‘Honoring 

the Nation’s First Responders Day’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 30 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 29), 2020 

Ms. WARREN (for herself, Mr. COTTON, Mr. PETERS, Ms. ROSEN, Mr. JOHNSON, and Mr. LANKFORD) submitted the following concurrent resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of October 28, 2020, 

as ‘‘Honoring the Nation’s First Responders Day’’. 

Whereas, in the United States, first responders include professional and volunteer firefighters, police officers, emergency medical technicians, and paramedics; 

Whereas, according to a 2017 compilation of data on the 

Emergency Services Sector in the United States by the 

Department of Homeland Security, ‘‘The first responder 

community comprises an estimated 4.6 million career and 

volunteer professionals within five primary disciplines: 

Law Enforcement, Fire and Rescue Services, Emergency 

Medical Services, Emergency Management, and Public 

Works.’’; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•SCON 48 IS 

Whereas first responders deserve to be recognized for their 

commitment to safety, defense, and honor; 

Whereas the people of the United States have depended on 

the service and sacrifices of first responders during the 

national emergency relating to the Coronavirus disease 

2019 (COVID–19) pandemic; and 

Whereas October 28, 2020, would be an appropriate day to 

establish as ‘‘Honoring the Nation’s First Responders 

Day’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), That Congress— 

3 (1) supports the designation of October 28, 

4 2020, as ‘‘Honoring the Nation’s First Responders 

5 Day’’; 

6 (2) honors and recognizes the contributions of 

7 first responders; and 

8 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

9 to observe Honoring the Nation’s First Responders 

10 Day with appropriate ceremonies and activities that 

11 promote awareness of the contributions of first re12 sponders in the United States. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
#### Abraham Sacks, Respondent, v. Louis E. Philips, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

No opinion. Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell and Taylor, JJ., concur; Adel, J., dissents and votes to reverse the judgment and to grant a new trial, with the following memorandum: This is not an ordinary case of the meeting of two automobiles, where the jury is to be instructed to determine whether either or both of the operators were negligent. Something more than the usual charge should have been made in view of the evidence of defendant Nachamkin that he caused'the situation wherein the appellant Philips could only be cast in damages if, when confronted with the situation thus caused by the eodefendant Nachamkin, he did not act as a reasonably prudent person would or should have acted, and by reason of his conduct contributed to the accident. In that respect the charge to the jury was inadequate and for that reason there should be a new trial.
§ 45.6 Termination of authorization. ( a ) *By the Commission.* Orders of authorization under section 305(b) of the Act are subject to revocation by the Commission after due notice to applicant and opportunity for hearing. In any such proceeding the burden of proof shall be upon the applicant to show that neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by the holding of such positions.
( b ) *Without action of the Commission.* Whenever a person shall cease to hold a position theretofore authorized to be held by the Commission or such position shall cease to be within the purview of section 305(b) of the Federal Power Act, the Commission's authorization to hold such position shall terminate without further action by the Commission. If upon such termination of authorization as aforesaid, such person does not continue to hold at least two positions authorized and then requiring authorization pursuant to said section 305(b) of the Act, all authorization theretofore given by the Commission shall thereupon terminate.
#### § 10.7 Cessation of activity.

The chief officer or other officer of the registrant organization must notify the Attorney General promptly upon the cessation of the activity of the organization, its branches, chapters, or affiliates by virtue of which registration has been required pursuant to the act.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 953 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 953

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 1100 West Kent Avenue in Missoula, Montana, as the ``Jeannette 
                     Rankin Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 28, 2019

  Mr. Daines introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 1100 West Kent Avenue in Missoula, Montana, as the ``Jeannette 
                     Rankin Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JEANNETTE RANKIN POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1100 West Kent Avenue in Missoula, Montana, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Jeannette Rankin Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Jeannette 
Rankin Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 21.1 Definitions. ( a ) *Agency proceeding.* An agency process as defined by 5 U.S.C. 551 (5), (7) and (9).
( b ) *Alien.* Any person who is not a citizen or national of the United States.
( c ) *Judicial proceeding.* Any action or suit, including any condemnation, preliminary, informational or other proceeding of a judicial nature. Examples of the latter include, but are not limited to, hearings and conferences before a committing court, magistrate, or commission, grand jury proceedings, pre-trial conferences, depositions, and coroners' inquests. It does not include information or investigative proceedings conducted by a prosecuting attorney for the purpose of determining whether an information or charge should be made in a particular case. The judicial proceeding may be in the District of Columbia, a State, or a territory or possession of the United States including the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico or the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands.
( d ) *Pre-trial conference.* A conference between the Government Attorney and a witness to discuss the witness' testimony. The conference must take place after a trial, hearing or grand jury proceeding has been scheduled but prior to the witness' actual appearance at the proceeding.
( e ) *Residence.* The term *residence* is not limited to the legal residence, but includes any place at which the witness is actually residing and at which the subpoena or summons is served. If the residence of the witness at the time of appearance is different from the place of subpoena or summons, the new place of residence shall be considered the witness' residence for computation of the transportation allowance; but, if the witness is on a business or vacation trip at the time of appearance, the witness shall be paid for travel from the place of service if this does not result in the witness being paid for more travel than is actually performed.
( f ) *Summons.* An official request, invitation or call, evidenced by an official writing of the court, authority, or party responsible for the conduct of the proceeding.
S CWC

- 17

- 0000226

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI  I

________________________________________________________________

STATE OF HAWAI  I, Respondent/Plaintiff

- Appellee,

vs.

PATRICK WILLIAMS, Petitioner/Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________________________________________________

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP

- 17

- 0000226; 1FC151000047 )

ORDER OF CORRECTION

(By: McKenna, J.)

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Opinion of the Court,

filed January 3, 2020, is corrected as follows:

On page 33, the attorney credits shall read:

Lesley N. Maloian

(Taryn R. Tomasa

with her on the briefs)

for petitioner

Stephen K. Tsushima

for respondent

The Clerk of the Court is directed to take all

necessary steps to notify the publishing agencies of this

change.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ʻ i, January 9, 2020.

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

Associate Justice Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-17-0000226

09-JAN-2020

10:43 AM
### §2806. Contracts and grants

#### (a) In general

The Secretaries may each carry out any action that such Secretary is responsible for implementing under the Plan through grants to, or contracts with, any person, any other Federal department or agency, any State agency, or any regional commission.

#### (b) Terms and conditions

Any contract entered into, or any grant made, under subsection (a) shall contain such terms and conditions as the Secretary concerned shall by regulation prescribe as being necessary or appropriate to protect the interests of the United States. No contract may be entered into, and no grant may be made under subsection (a), for any purpose that is in violation of any applicable State or local law.

#### (c) Limitation

The amount of any grant made under subsection (a) may not exceed an amount equal to one-half the estimated cost of the project for which the grant is made.

#### (d) Audit

Each recipient of a grant or contract under this section shall make available to the Secretary concerned and to the Comptroller General of the United States, for purposes of audit and examination, any book, document, paper, or record that is pertinent to the funds received under such grant or contract.

(Pub. L. 96–362, §7, Sept. 26, 1980, 94 Stat. 1204.)
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2006-CR-9973, styled State of Texas v. Larry Buchanan , pending in the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, the Honorab le Juanita A. Vasquez-Gardne r presiding. However, the respondent named in relator’s petition is the Honorable Andr ew W. Carruthers, Criminal Law Magistrate, Bexar County, Texas. iii i i i



### MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-08-00450-CR IN RE Larry BUCHANAN Original Mandamus Proceeding 1 PER CURIAM Sitting: Alma L López, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Delivered and Filed: July 30, 2008 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED In a pro se original petition filed in this court, relator Larry Buchanan requests a writ of mandamus directing the Honorable Andrew W. Carru thers “to set aside with prejudice the felony indictment” pending against him “due to excessive [trial] delay.” Mandamus relief is not available to a defendant seeking dismissal of a charge on speedy trial grounds. Smith v. Gohmert , 962 S.W.2d 590, 593 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998) (orig. proceeding); In re Hearon , 228 S.W.3d 466, 467 (Tex. App.—Waco 2007, orig. proceeding); In re Thomas , 119 S.W.3d 378, 378 (Tex. App.—Tyler 2003, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, relator’s petition is denied. PER CURIAM DO NOT PUBLISH
Exhibit 10.5

                              SECOND AMENDMENT
                                   TO THE
                         HANNAFORD CASH BALANCE PLAN


     The Hannaford Cash Balance Plan,  formerly named the Employees'  Retirement
Plan,  was last amended and restated  effective  generally  January 1, 1998. The
Plan was  thereafter  amended  on one  occasion  and is  hereby  amended  in the
following respects:

     1. The terms used in this  Amendment  shall have the  meanings set forth in
the Plan unless the context indicates otherwise.

     2. The  first  paragraph  of  Section  1.11 is  hereby  amended  to read as
follows:

         "1.11    'Compensation' shall mean the basic compensation paid,
     before any reduction pursuant to a deferral election under a Code
     Section 401(k) plan or a benefit election under a Code Section 125
     plan sponsored by an Employer, to a Participant by an Employer,
     including compensation for incentive hours and excluding
     reimbursements or other expense allowances, fringe benefits (cash and
     noncash), moving expenses, deferred compensation, welfare benefits
     (other than short term disability payments), unguaranteed overtime
     pay, bonuses and other irregular payments."

     3. The first paragraph of Section 2.1 is hereby amended to read as follows:

          "2.1  DATE OF PARTICIPATION.  Each Employee who is a Participant
     on the Effective Date shall continue to participate in the Plan in
     accordance with its terms.  Each Employee who is in the employ of an
     Employer on the Effective Date and who meets the requirements of
     Section 2.2 on or before December 31, 1997, shall commence
     participation as of the Effective Date.  Each other Employee who
     thereafter satisfies the minimum age and service requirements
     specified in Section 2.2 shall commence participation in the Plan as
     of the first day of the second month following the month in which such
     Employee satisfies such requirements, provided such Employee is still
     in the employ of an Employer on such date.  In no event shall an
     Employee who is employed in the Southeast Division commence
     participation prior to the Effective Date, unless such Employee
     commenced participation prior to being transferred to such division.
     Effective January 1, 2000, each Employee who was previously employed
     by Pic-n-Pay, Inc., shall be eligible to participate in the Plan as of
<PAGE>


     the later of the closing date of the acquisition by the Company of
     Pic-n-Pay, Inc., or the first day of the second month following the
     month in which he or she meets the requirements of Section 2.2.  For
     purposes of determining whether such Employee has completed a Year of
     Participation Service, his or her service with Pic-n-Pay shall be
     taken into account."

     4. This Amendment generally shall be effective January 1, 2000.
Editorial Note on Part 284
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 284 appear at 65 FR 10222, Feb. 25, 2000.

§ 284.288 Code of conduct for unbundled sales service. ( a ) To the extent Seller engages in reporting of transactions to publishers of electricity or natural gas indices, Seller must provide accurate and factual information, and not knowingly submit false or misleading information or omit material information to any such publisher, by reporting its transactions in a manner consistent with the procedures set forth in the *Policy Statement on Natural Gas and Electric Price Indices*, issued by the Commission in Docket No. PL03-3-000 and any clarifications thereto. Seller must notify the Commission as part of its FERC Form No. 552 annual reporting requirement in § 260.401 of this chapter whether it reports its transactions to publishers of electricity and natural gas indices. In addition, Seller must adhere to any other standards and requirements for price reporting as the Commission may order.
( b ) A pipeline that provides unbundled natural gas sales service under § 284.284 shall retain, for a period of five years, all data and information upon which it billed the prices it charged for natural gas it sold pursuant to its market based sales certificate or the prices it reported for use in price indices.
[Order 644, 68 FR 66336, Nov. 26, 2003, as amended by Order 673, 71 FR 9716, Feb. 27, 2006; Order 677, 71 FR 30287, May 26, 2006; 73 FR 1032, Jan. 4, 2008]
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Quotemedia, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Keith J. Randall, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to my best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Keith J. Randall   
|    |  | Keith J. Randall       
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer
|    |  | May 12, 2010
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2012-0216 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2010-SW-025-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO
                                     TO THE
                            CANANDAIGUA BRANDS, INC.
                        ANNUAL MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN


This Amendment  Number Two to the Canandaigua  Brands,  Inc.  Annual  Management
Incentive Plan (the "Plan") is adopted  pursuant to Section 8 of the Plan by the
Human  Resources  Committee of the Board of Directors of  Constellation  Brands,
Inc. (f/k/a Canandaigua Brands, Inc.) (the "Company"), acting in its capacity as
the  Committee  under the Plan.  Capitalized  terms  used  herein  which are not
otherwise defined shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Plan and Annex
A thereto.

     1.   NAME. The name of the Plan is hereby changed to "Constellation Brands,
          Inc.  Annual  Management  Incentive  Plan," and all  references to the
          Company  name  in the  Plan  are  hereby  replaced  by  references  to
          "Constellation Brands, Inc."


In witness whereof,  Constellation Brands, Inc. has caused this instrument to be
executed as of December 21, 2000.

                                                  CONSTELLATION BRANDS, INC.


                                                  By: /s/ Richard Sands
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Richard Sands, President