alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 51 (Wednesday, March 16, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 14436]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6127]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 50-156; NRC-2010-0203]


University of Wisconsin, University of Wisconsin Nuclear Reactor; 
Notice of Issuance of Environmental Assessment and Finding of No 
Significant Impact; Correction

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Notice of Issuance; Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects a notice appearing in the Federal 
Register on September 16, 2010 (75 FR 56597), which informed the public 
that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission is considering issuance of 
a renewed Facility License No. R-74 for the University of Wisconsin 
which would authorize continued operation of the University of 
Wisconsin Nuclear Reactor. This action is necessary to add supplemental 
documentation and to correct dose equivalent values.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Geoffrey A. Wertz, Office of Nuclear 
Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 
20555-0001; telephone 301-415-0893, e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2265474d444450475b0c7547505658624c50410c454d54"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e5a2808a838397809ccbb28097919fa58b9786cb828a93">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On page 56599, appearing in the third 
column, first paragraph under Environmental Effects of Accidents, add 
to the end of the sentence ``, and as supplemented on February 8, 2011 
(ADAMS Accession No. ML110410534).'' Also appearing in the third 
column, next to the last sentence under Environmental Effects of 
Accidents, the dose equivalent values are being corrected to 
incorporate the supplemental information received to read from ``The 
maximum dose to a worker in confinement for 5 minutes would be 1.35 rem 
total effective dose equivalent, 35.8 rem committed dose equivalent to 
the thyroid gland, and 278 millirem effective dose equivalent'' to 
``The maximum dose to a worker in confinement for 5 minutes would be 
0.145 rem total effective dose equivalent, 3.67 rem committed dose 
equivalent to the thyroid gland, and 34.6 millirem effective dose 
equivalent.''

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 8th day of March 2011.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Jessie Quichocho,
Chief, Research and Test Reactors Licensing Branch, Division of Policy 
and Rulemaking, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
[FR Doc. 2011-6127 Filed 3-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

FRANK SILVA ROQUE, Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 14-0717 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR2001-095385

The Honorable Mark F. Aceto, Retired Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix

By Diane Meloche

Counsel for Respondent

Frank Silva Roque, Buckeye

Petitioner

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge Kenton D. Jones delivered the decision of the Court, in 

which Judge Randall M. Howe and Judge Donn Kessler joined.
STATE v. ROQUE

Decision of the Court

2

J O N E S, Judge:

¶1 Petitioner Frank Silva Roque petitions this court for review 

from the summary dismissal of his notice of post-conviction relief filed 

August 15, 2014. Roque argues the Arizona Supreme Court erred when it 

addressed a disclosure issue in his case on direct appeal in 2006. See State 

v. Roque, 213 Ariz. 193, 209-11, ¶¶ 41, 48-50, 52 (2006). Roque asks this court 

to correct the supreme court’s opinion and order a new trial. 

¶2 We deny relief because Roque has failed to present a 

cognizable claim pursuant to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1 or 

otherwise present a colorable claim for relief. This Court has no authority 

to overrule, modify, or disregard a decision of the Arizona Supreme Court. 

Myers v. Reeb, 190 Ariz. 341, 342 (App. 1997) (“Whether prior decisions of 

the Arizona Supreme Court are to be disaffirmed is a question for that 

court.”) (quoting City of Phx. v. Leroy’s Liquors, Inc., 177 Ariz. 375, 378 (App. 

1993)).

¶3 We grant review but deny relief.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 23

- 40377 Summary Calendar

**____________ Lisa Marie Searcy,**  Plaintiff

— Appellant **,**

versus **Texas Attorney General Warren Kenneth Paxton, Jr.; Helen Truscott,**  Attorney **; Jennifer Burnett,** Attorney **; Jana Wheeler,**  Attorney **; Mark Aronowitz,** Attorney **; Et al.,** Defendants

— Appellees

**.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 3:21

- CV

- 113

**______________________________** Before **Wiener, Stewart,** and **Douglas,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *****
Plaintiff

- Appellant Lisa Marie Searcy has filed a pro se appeal from the dismissal of her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action and the denial of her mandamus petitions. H er arguments are purely conclusory, with out the required citations to authority and the record and with no explanation of how the

**_____________________**

* This opinion is no t designated for publication. See **5th Cir**

**. R** 

**.** 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 22, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-40377 Document: 00517039514 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/22/2024No. 23

- 40377

2 district court erred. See **Fed. R. App. P.** 28(a)(8); Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, s he has abandoned any challenge to the district court’s decision. See United States v. Scroggins , 599 F.3d 433, 446 (5th Cir. 2010); Brinkmann v. Dallas Cnty. Deputy Sheriff Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987)

. **AFFIRMED**

. Case: 23-40377 Document: 00517039514 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/22/2024
-  Home 

# In This Section

                      -  The GLS Today                          -  What does the GLS do? 
                        -  The St. Lawrence Seaway Management Corporation 
                        -  The Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Seaway System 
                        -  Meet the Administrator 
                        -  Meet Our Team 
                        -  Careers at the GLS 
                        -  Contact the GLS 
                      -  Historic Photos and Other Artifacts 

# GLS Advisory Board meeting minutes September 6, 2022

Advisory-Board-Meeting-Minutes(9-6-2022).pdf (236.85 KB)

*DOT is committed to ensuring that information is available in appropriate alternative formats to meet the requirements of persons who have a disability. If you require an alternative version of files provided on this page, please contact					LaToya.James@dot.gov.*
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 50 (Tuesday, March 15, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 13994]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5906]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID DOD-2011-OS-0031]


Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records

AGENCY: Defense Information Systems Agency, DoD.

ACTION: Notice to delete a system of records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Information Systems Agency is deleting a system of 
records notice in its existing inventory of record systems subject to 
the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.

DATES: This proposed action will be effective without further notice on 
April 14, 2011 unless comments are received which result in a contrary 
determination.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by dock number and/or 
RIN number and title, by any of the following methods:
    <bullet> Federal Rulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    <bullet> Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 1160 
Defense Pentagon, OSD Mailroom 3C843, Washington, DC 20301-1160.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name 
and docket number or Regulatory Information Number (RIN) for this 
Federal Register document. The general policy for comments and other 
submissions from members of the public is to make these submissions 
available for public viewing on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, including any 
personal identifiers or contact information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Jeanette M. Weathers-Jenkins at 
(703) 681-2103, or Defense Information Systems Agency, 5600 Columbia 
Pike, Room 933-I, Falls Church, VA 22041-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Defense Information Systems Agency 
systems of records notice subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 
552a), as amended, have been published in the Federal Register and are 
available from the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT address above.
    The Defense Information Systems Agency proposes to delete a system 
of records notice from its inventory of record systems subject to the 
Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended. The proposed deletion 
is not within the purview of subsection (r) of the Privacy Act of 1974, 
(5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, which requires the submission of a new or 
altered system report.

    Dated: March 2, 2011.
Morgan F. Park,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

Deletion:
K700.03
    Manpower and Personnel System (MAPS) (February 22, 1993, 58 FR 
10562).

Reason:
    Manpower and Personnel System (MAPS) has been replaced with Open 
Source Corporate Management Information System (OS-CMIS), which is 
covered by OPM/GOVT-1 General Personnel Records (June 19, 2006, 71 FR 
35356).

[FR Doc. 2011-5906 Filed 3-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
##### 



Exhibit 8

List of Principal Subsidiaries

of

Grupo Industrial Maseca, S.A. de C.V.

|                                                            |  |                              
|----------------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Subsidiary                                                  |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|                                                            |  |                              
|Molinos Azteca, S.A. de C.V                                 |  | Mexico                       
|                                                            |  |                              
|Industrias de Río Bravo, S.A. de C.V.                       |  | Mexico                       
|                                                            |  |                              
|Harinera de Veracruz, S.A. de C.V.                          |  | Mexico                       
|                                                            |  |                              
|Molinos Azteca de Jalisco, S.A. de C.V.                     |  | Mexico                       
|                                                            |  |                              
|Molinos Azteca de Chalco, S.A. de C.V.                      |  | Mexico                       
|                                                            |  |                              
|Harinera de Maíz de Jalisco, S.A. de C.V.                   |  | Mexico                       
|                                                            |  |                              
|Harinera de Yucatán, S.A. de C.V.                           |  | Mexico                       
|                                                            |  |                              
|Harinera de Maíz de Mexicali, S.A. de C.V.                  |  | Mexico                       
|                                                            |  |                              
|Molinos Azteca de Chiapas, S.A. de C.V.                     |  | Mexico                       
|                                                            |  |                              
|Molinos Azteca de Veracruz, S.A. de C.V.                    |  | Mexico                       
|                                                            |  |                              
|Compañía Nacional Almacenadora, S.A. de C.V.                |  | Mexico                       
|                                                            |  |                              
|Servicios Administrativos y Financieros Gimsa, S.A. de C.V. |  | Mexico                       
|                                                            |  |                              
|Industria Tortilladora Azteca, S.A. de C.V.                 |  | Mexico                       
|                                                            |  |                              
|Arrendadora de Maquinaria de Chihuahua, S.A. de C.V.        |  | Mexico
BLM

Wyoming State Office  High Plains District Office

RECORD OF DECISION for the 

Caballo West Lease by Application 

Campbell County, Wyoming WYW172657 

August 2010
 
 

 

The BLM’s multiple-use mission is to sustain the health and productivity of the 

public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations. The 

Bureau accomplishes this by managing such activities as outdoor recreation, 

livestock grazing, mineral development, and energy production, and by conserving 

natural, historical, cultural, and other resources on public lands. 

BLM/WY/PL-10/037+1320
|  |                      |
|--|----------------------|
|  | Home | Previous Page |

|  |  | Investment Company Act of 1940 - Section 3 and 7Exelon CorporationSeptember 13, 2007
RESPONSE OF THE OFFICE OF CHIEF COUNSEL	DIVISION OF INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT

Our Ref. No. 200789148	Exelon Corporation	File No. 132-3

Based upon the facts and representations contained in your September 12, 2007 letter, we would not recommend enforcement action to the Securities and Exchange Commission against Exelon Corporation ("Exelon"), Exelon Generation Company, LLC ("Generation"), or the Decommissioning Trusts (as defined in your letter) under Section 7 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 ("Investment Company Act") if Exelon, Generation, and the Decommissioning Trusts operate in the manner described in your letter without registration as investment companies under the Investment Company Act. Because our position is based on the facts and representations in your letter, you should note that any different facts or representations may require a different conclusion. This response expresses our views on enforcement action only and does not express any legal conclusion on the issues presented.

Susan Gault-BrownSenior Counsel
Incoming Letter
The Incoming Letter is in Acrobat format.

*http://www.sec.gov/divisions/investment/noaction/2007/exelon091307.htm*Home | Previous PageModified: 09/18/2007 |
|--|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 28, 2014

h0224 

# Order

Clerk February 28, 2014

147866 & (18)(19)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147866

COA: 315348

Wayne CC: 02

- 014742

- FC

ROGER YOUNG,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion to file supplemental brief is GRANTED. The

application for leave to appeal the August 29, 2013 order of the Court of Appeals is

considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion for relief from judgment

is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G). The motion for miscellaneous relief to enter a

co nfession of error is DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Balance
Sheets  for  Cimarron-Grandview Group, Inc. at December 31, 1998, the Statements
of Income for the year ended December 31, 1998, and is qualified in its entirety
by  reference  to  such  financial  statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          28,688
<SECURITIES>                                    10,964
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                39,652
<PP&E>                                           3,911
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  43,563
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,267
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       591,799
<OTHER-SE>                                    (550,503)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    43,563
<SALES>                                            764
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   764
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,153
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,502
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (24,891)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (24,891)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (24,891)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        







</TABLE>
HELP YOUR CHILDREN GROW.

Spend time together to show you care about your child’s health, 

wellness, and success.

Young people are more likely to listen when they know you’re on their side. Explain why you don’t 

want your child to drink or use other drugs—not just because you say so, but because you want 

your child to be happy and safe. For tips on how—and when—to begin the conversation, visit: 

www.underagedrinking.samhsa.gov

SMA-18-5084PSTCRD
# C_2013141EN.01000302.xml

| 18.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 141/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 14 March 2013 — European Commission v Ireland

(Case C-108/11) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - VAT - Reduced rate - Supply of greyhounds and horses not intended for the preparation or production of foodstuffs for human or animal consumption, hire of horses and insemination services - Directive 2006/112/EC - Infringement of Articles 96, 98, read in conjunction with Annex III, and 110)

2013/C 141/04

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal and C. Soulay, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Ireland (represented by: E. Creedon, D. O’Hagan, M. Collins and N. Travers, Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: French Republic (represented by: G. de Bergues and J.S. Pilczer, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Articles 96, 98 (in conjunction with Annex III) and Article 110 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1) — National legislation applying a reduced VAT rate to supplies of greyhounds and horses not normally intended for the preparation of foodstuffs, to the hire of horses and to certain insemination services

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, in applying a reduced rate of value added tax of 4.8% to supplies of greyhounds and horses not intended for the preparation of foodstuffs, to the hire of horses and certain insemination services, Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 96, 98, read in conjunction with Annex III, and 110 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, in applying a reduced rate of value added tax of 4.8% to supplies of greyhounds and horses not intended for the preparation of foodstuffs, to the hire of horses and certain insemination services, Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 96, 98, read in conjunction with Annex III, and 110 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax;

| 2. | Orders Ireland to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ireland to pay the costs;

| 3. | Orders the French Republic to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the French Republic to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 145, 14.5.2011.

1

---
Exhibit 23.1











CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM











We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-166597) and Form S-8 (Nos.333-147808, 333-119045, 333-78805, and 333-152491) of The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc. of our report dated May 10, 2011 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.








/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Florham Park, New Jersey


May 10, 2011