alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 22 (Thursday, February 2, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 5291]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-2347]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7782]

The Designation of Mevlut Kar, Also Known as Mivlut Kar, Also 
Known as Mavlut Kar, Also Known as Mawlud Kar, Also Known as Meluvet 
Kar, Also Known as Mevlut Zikara, Also Known as Abdullah the Turk, Also 
Known as Mulfit Kar Iiyas Al Ubayda, Also Known as Abu Obeidah Al 
Turki, as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist Pursuant to Section 
1(b) of Executive Order 13224, as Amended

    Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(b) 
of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by Executive 
Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, and Executive Order 13284 of January 23, 
2003, I hereby determine that the individual known as Mevlut Kar, also 
known as Mivlut Kar, also known as Mavlut Kar, also known as Mawlud 
Kar, also known as Meluvet Kar, also known as Mevlut Zikara, also known 
as Abdullah the Turk, also known as Mulfit Kar Iiyas Al Ubayda, also 
known as Abu Obeidah Al Turki, committed, or poses a significant risk 
of committing, acts of terrorism that threaten the security of U.S. 
nationals or the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the 
United States.
    Consistent with the determination in Section 10 of Executive Order 
13224 that ``prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the 
Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States 
would render ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in 
the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously,'' I 
determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person 
subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence 
in the United States, because to do so would render ineffectual the 
measures authorized in the Order.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: January 20, 2012.
Hillary Rodham Clinton,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-2347 Filed 2-1-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Whitemark Homes, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

      1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

Date:   April 14, 2004                  By:  /s/ Larry White
                                            ------------------------------------
                                             Larry White,
                                             President, Chief Executive Officer
                                             And Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Whitemark Homes, Inc.
and will be retained by Whitemark Homes, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2010161EN.01004301.xml

| 19.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/43

---

Action brought on 25 January 2010 — Noko Ngele v Commission

(Case T-15/10)

(2010/C 161/68)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Mariyus Noko Ngele (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: F. Sabakunzi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

| — | declare that the CDE never replaced the CDI and that it does not exist in law or have legal personality in Belgium; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that the CDE never replaced the CDI and that it does not exist in law or have legal personality in Belgium;

| — | order the European Commission, and one of its Members and certain officers thereof, jointly and severally, to pay the amount of EUR 200 000 in respect of financial damage, in addition to statutory interest of 10 % per annum as from 1995 plus interest to be determined by the Court; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Commission, and one of its Members and certain officers thereof, jointly and severally, to pay the amount of EUR 200 000 in respect of financial damage, in addition to statutory interest of 10 % per annum as from 1995 plus interest to be determined by the Court;

| — | order the European Commission, and one of its Members and certain officers thereof, jointly and severally, to pay the amount of EUR 5 000 000 in respect of non-material and psychological damage, in addition to interest to be determined by the Court; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Commission, and one of its Members and certain officers thereof, jointly and severally, to pay the amount of EUR 5 000 000 in respect of non-material and psychological damage, in addition to interest to be determined by the Court;

| — | declare that the judgment to be delivered will be enforceable notwithstanding any possible appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that the judgment to be delivered will be enforceable notwithstanding any possible appeal;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs and a procedural indemnity of EUR 30 000. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs and a procedural indemnity of EUR 30 000.

Pleas in law and main arguments

By the present action, the applicant claims damages for the loss allegedly suffered as a result of the impossibility of pursuing recovery of a debt owed to him by the ‘Centre pour le développement industriel (CDI)’ in consequence of the replacement of that organisation by a joint institution of the ACP (African, Caribbean and Pacific) Group of States and the European Union named ‘Centre pour le développement de l’entreprise (CDE)’.

---
```

[113th Congress Public Law 247]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 128 STAT. 2883]]

Public Law 113-247
113th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
442 Miller Valley Road in Prescott, Arizona, as the ``Barry M. Goldwater 
         Post Office''. <<NOTE: Dec. 18, 2014 -  [H.R. 3027]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. BARRY M. GOLDWATER POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 442 Miller Valley Road in Prescott, Arizona, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Barry M. Goldwater Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Barry M. 
Goldwater Post Office''.

    Approved December 18, 2014.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3027:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 160 (2014):
            July 14, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 15, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
<PAGE>

                            EXHIBIT 23.1


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
ENCAD, Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements
No. 33-72978, No. 33-95252 and No. 333-24965 of ENCAD, Inc. on Form S-8 of 
our report dated February 4, 1997, incorporated by reference in this Annual 
report on Form 10-K/A of ENCAD, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1996.


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

San Diego, California
May 2, 1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF SEPTEMBER 26, 2999, AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS SEPTEMBER 26, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-26-1999
<CASH>                                           5,587
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   75,502
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,884
<INVENTORY>                                    141,368
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               238,158
<PP&E>                                         321,158
<DEPRECIATION>                                 218,557
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 463,990
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          106,019
<BONDS>                                        490,470
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     35,822
<COMMON>                                           240
<OTHER-SE>                                   (209,528)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   463,990
<SALES>                                        338,564
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               338,564
<CGS>                                          219,735
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  219,735
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               181,765
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,177
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (93,113)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       718
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (93,976)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (93,976)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (4.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (4.04)


</TABLE>
### **CHAPTER 12D—COLUMBIA BASIN PROJECT**

Sec.
835.
Project authorized; laws applicable.
835–1.
Laws governing.
835a, 835b. Repealed.
835c.
Duties of Secretary of the Interior.
835c–1.
Taxation and assessments; applicability of State laws.
835c–2.
Authorization of appropriations establishment of Columbia Basin Land Development Account.
835c–3.
Repealed.
835c–4.
General powers of Secretary of the Interior; delegation to authorized representatives.
835c–5.
Repealed.
835d.
Acquisition of Indian lands, Spokane and Colville Reservations.
835e.
Payment for lands acquired from Spokane and Colville Reservations.
835f.
Use of funds deposited to allottees; land and improvements.
835g.
Relocation of Indian cemeteries.
835h.
Acts and regulations by Secretary of the Interior.
835i.
Contracts with State of Washington for maintenance and operation of fish hatcheries.
835j.
Projects marketing commercial power and energy; consolidated financial statement to President and Congress; adjustment of rates to assure return of reimbursable construction costs within prescribed period.
835k.
Return of construction costs from marketing revenues in event of inability of irrigation water users to repay within repayment period and lack of other sources of revenue.
835 l.
Congressional declaration of financial policy; limitations on assistance; analyses and studies; "net revenues" defined.
835m.
Recommendations for changes in limitations on financial assistance; time and frequency of submission.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Quotemedia, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Keith J. Randall, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to my best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         
|-------------------------
|By:  /s/ Keith J. Randall
|Keith J. Randall         
|Chief Financial Officer  
|October 29, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements of The Smithfield Companies,
Inc. for the nine months ended December 31, 1997, and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       7,685,915
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,467,417
<ALLOWANCES>                                    73,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,300,666
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,573,279
<PP&E>                                       6,448,511
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,167,410
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,659,953
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,022,585
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,563,243
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,074,125
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,659,953
<SALES>                                     17,181,931
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,270,165
<CGS>                                       11,611,619
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,959,615
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,483,796
<INCOME-TAX>                                   498,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            985,796
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   985,796
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .42
        

</TABLE>
### SUBCHAPTER CXLII—VINAGRE WASH SPECIAL MANAGEMENT AREA
No. 19,716.

#### The People of the State of Colorado *v.*Wendell Austin Peters.

(378 P. [2d] 205)

Decided January 28, 1963.

Mr. Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General, Mr. Frank E. Hickey, Deputy, for the People of the State of Colorado.

No appearance for respondent.

*En Banc.*

Mr. Justice Moore

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is an original proceeding in discipline.

It appears from the record herein that on May 16, 1961, Wendell Austin Peters, the respondent above named, was convicted in the district court for the City and County of Denver, of the crime of larceny by bailee of property of a value in excess of $50.00, a felony under the laws of this state. Following said conviction *410respondent prosecuted a writ of error to this court seeking reversal of the judgment.

November 5, 1962, this court affirmed the judgment and thereafter, on December 3, 1962, his motion for rehearing was denied and remittitur was issued to said district court. Thereafter, on the 14th day of December, 1962, a citation was issued by order of this court and served on said Wendell Austin Peters in words and figures as follows:

> “You are hereby ordered and directed to answer in writing and show cause within thirty days from this day why your name should not be stricken from the roll or record of persons who have been regularly licensed and admitted to practice as attorneys and counselors at law within this state for conviction of a felony as provided by C.R.S. 1953, 39-10-17.

> “A copy of the motion of the Attorney General of the State of Colorado requesting issuance of this citation or notice is attached hereto and served herewith.”

More than thirty days have expired since service of the foregoing citation was made on respondent and he has made no appearance or response thereto.

It is accordingly ordered that the respondent be disbarred and his name stricken from the roll of attorneys licensed to practice law in this state.

Mr. Justice Pringle not participating.
§ 385.212 Motions (Rule 212). ( a ) *General rule.* A motion may be filed: ( 1 ) At any time, unless otherwise provided;
( 2 ) By a participant or a person who has filed a timely motion to intervene which has not been denied;
( 3 ) In any proceeding except an informal rulemaking proceeding.
( b ) *Written and oral motions.* Any motion must be filed in writing, except that the presiding officer may permit an oral motion to be made on the record during a hearing or conference.
( c ) *Contents.* A motion must contain a clear and concise statement of: ( 1 ) The facts and law which support the motion; and
( 2 ) The specific relief or ruling requested.
[Order 225, 47 FR 19022, May 3, 1982, as amended by Order 225-A, 47 FR 35956, Aug. 18, 1982; Order 376, 49 FR 21705, May 23, 1984]
### §1006. Cooperative programs

The Secretary is authorized in cooperation with other Federal and with States and local agencies to make investigations and surveys of the watershed of rivers and other waterways as a basis for the development of coordinated programs. In areas where the programs of the Secretary of Agriculture may affect public or other lands under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Interior, the Secretary of the Interior is authorized to cooperate with the Secretary of Agriculture in the planning and development of works or programs for such lands.

(Aug. 4, 1954, ch. 656, §6, 68 Stat. 668.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of certain enforcement functions of Secretary or other official in Department of Agriculture under this chapter to Federal Inspector, Office of Federal Inspector for Alaska Natural Gas Transportation System, and subsequent transfer to Secretary of Energy, then to Federal Coordinator for Alaska Natural Gas Transportation Projects, see note set out under section 1002 of this title.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7729
JOHN JOSEPH BERLIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus EDWARD W. MURRAY; M. WATKINS; D. A. BRAXTON; RANDALL JACKSON; GEORGE P. DOBSON; UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS 1-100, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-95-376-R) Submitted: May 15, 1997 Decided: May 28, 1997 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.John Joseph Berlin, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: John Berlin, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the recordand the district court's opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny Berlin's motion for general relief and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Berlin v. Murray , No. CA-95-376-R (W.D. Va. Oct. 28, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Third Department,

November, 2006

(November 2, 2006)

#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Fabio Martinez, Respondent.

[823 NYS2d 574]

Mercure, J.E

Appeal from an order of the County Court of Greene County (Lalor, J.), entered January 30, 2006, which, inter alia, reduced count one of the indictment to a lesser included offense.

In June 2005, while defendant was an inmate at Greene Correctional Facility in Greene County, correction officers discovered marihuana in his possession with a total aggregate weight of 0.13 grams. Defendant was charged in a two-count indictment with promoting prison contraband in the first degree and unlawful possession of marihuana. Defendant moved for, among other things, dismissal of the indictment or, in the alternative, the reduction of count one. County Court reduced count one of the indictment to a charge of promoting prison contraband in the second degree, and the People now appeal.

“[T]he danger posed to a facility from *‘a*very small amount of marihuana’ is not as apparent as it is with weapons and, thus, requires ‘competent and specific proof of the danger posed to the security and safety of the particular facility” *(People v Salters,*30 AD3d 903, 904 [2006], quoting *People v Brown, 2*AD3d 1216, 1217-1218 [2003], *lv denied*3 NY3d 637 [2004]). Moreover, proof of “only broad penological concerns” is insufficient to establish the danger posed to the facility *(People v Brown, supra*at 1217). Here, the People offered testimony from a high-ranking correction officer who provided the grand jury with only a general description of the dangers posed to a correctional facility when inmates possess items considered to have value in the prison setting, likening the possession of marihuana to that of cigarettes or soap. We cannot conclude, however, that the amount of marihuana at issue here poses a danger based upon “general concerns . . . that are not addressed to the specific *860facts of the particular situation” *(id.*at 1218; *compare People v Salters, supra*at 905). Thus, we agree with County Court that the evidence was not legally sufficient to support the charge of promoting prison contraband in the first degree, and County Court properly reduced the charge to promoting prison contraband in the second degree *(see*CPL 210.20 [1-a]).

Spain, Mugglin, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed. [See 11 Misc 3d 947 (2006).]
### SUBCHAPTER I—WHALING TREATY ACT
### §9805. Data on domestic travel and tourism

The Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Travel and Tourism, subject to the availability of appropriations, shall collect and make public aggregate data on domestic travel and tourism trends.

(Pub. L. 117–328, div. BB, title VI, §608, Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 5570.)
15.096