alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Gallatin

National

Forest

ThreeForks

Gallatin

County

Radersburg

Gallatin

National

Forest

Park

County

Bozeman

Livingston

Yellowstone

National Park

Bridger

 

 

 

Mountains

Gallatin

National

Forest

Gallatin

National

Forest

Para dise

V alley

Gallatin

 Range

Absaroka

 Range

Township4 N.

Range 7 E. Range 9 E.

Range 11 E.

Township2 N.

Township2 S.

Township4 S.

Township6 S.

Range 13 E.

Township

4 S.

Township

6 S.

Township

8 S.

Range 1 W.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 832 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                 Union Calendar No. 353
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                 S. 832

                          [Report No. 116-441]

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 28, 2019

            Rreferred to the Committee on Natural Resources

                              July 9, 2020

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To nullify the Supplemental Treaty Between the United States of America 
  and the Confederated Tribes and Bands of Indians of Middle Oregon, 
                    concluded on November 15, 1865.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NULLIFICATION OF TREATY.

    The Supplemental Treaty Between the United States of America and 
the Confederated Tribes and Bands of Indians of Middle Oregon, 
concluded on November 15, 1865, and entered into pursuant to the Senate 
resolution of ratification dated March 2, 1867 (14 Stat. 751), shall 
have no force or effect.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 353

116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                 S. 832

                          [Report No. 116-441]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To nullify the Supplemental Treaty Between the United States of America 
  and the Confederated Tribes and Bands of Indians of Middle Oregon, 
                    concluded on November 15, 1865.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              July 9, 2020

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          36,682
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  205,162
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,114
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               275,603
<PP&E>                                         767,138
<DEPRECIATION>                                 678,340
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 390,168
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          922,356
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                     3,485,412
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   390,168
<SALES>                                        317,616
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               317,616
<CGS>                                           13,796
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,796
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               345,179
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,718
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (52,077)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (52,077)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (52,077)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1
                              C.E.O. Certification




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  Crescent  Moon,  Inc.  (Formerly
Cherokee  Investments,  Inc.) on Form  10-QSB for the period  ending  August 31,
2002, as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof
(the  "Report"),  I, Robert  Denome,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.




/S/ Robert Denome
Chief Executive Officer
December 30, 2002
§ 708.2 Scope. ( a ) This part describes minimum guidelines for public participation in the development, revision, and implementation of the Master Plan specified in the Act.
( b ) This part applies to the following organizations with references to the activities described in § 708.2(a): ( 1 ) The Commission, including its staff and persons, organizations, and agencies under contract to it for work within the scope of the Master Plan.
( 2 ) Such Federal departments and agencies as are directed under section 101(3) of the Act to conduct studies pursuant to the Master Plan, for any work carried out for purposes of developing, revising, and implementing the Master Plan.
( 3 ) Such departments and agencies of any state or local government as are authorized and/or directed to carry out studies and analyses under direction or advice of the Commission as stipulated in section 101 of the Act.
( c ) The guidelines referred to in this part shall be considered general requirements applicable to all studies, procedures, programs, regulations, or other administrative devices carried out under § 708.2(b), but only for those Master Plan Activities under authority of the Act.
Exhibit 23

                    Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K/A) of TFC Enterprises, Inc. of our report dated February 12,
1998, included in the 1997 Annual Report of TFC Enterprises, Inc.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-78376) pertaining to the TFC Enterprises, Inc.
1993 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of our reports dated February 12, 1998
with respect to the consolidated financial statements and consolidated
financial statement schedule of TFC Enterprises, Inc. incorporated by
reference or included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K and as amended on
Forms 10-K/A dated April 12, 1998 and April 22, 1998) for the year ended
December 31, 1997.

                                                ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Washington, D.C.
June 16, 1998
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7366
EZEKIEL C. CROSS, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus DOMINIC GUTIERREZ; BUREAU OF PRISONS, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. W. Craig Broadwater, District Judge. (CA-04-218) Submitted: March 10, 2006 Decided: April 19, 2006 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ezekiel C. Cross, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Ezekiel C. Cross, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny as unnecessary Cross’ motion for a certificate of appealability, and we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Cross v. Gutierrez , No. CA04-218 (N.D. W. Va. Aug. 18, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  For Partners 
-  Lenders 
-  Lender Reports 

## Section navigation

-  Lenders    -  7(a) loan program 
  -  CDC/504 loan program 
  -  Microloan program 
  -  Become an SBA lender 
  -  Lender reports 
  -  Training on demand 
-  Counselors 
-  SBICs 
-  Surety bond partners and agents 
-  Contracting officials 

# Lender reports

Using the links below, you can specify additional filters, and download results in spreadsheet or CSV format.
                  - 7(a) and 504 Lender Report   	This report summarizes SBA loan approvals by state and lender.   	 
                  - 7(a) and 504 summary report   	This report summarizes SBA loan approvals by different segments.     	(see  PDF versions of older reports )

For more information, see the full lender activity reports (updated monthly).
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 09391**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket** **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  09391\09391_Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement x 09391\09391_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

09391\09391_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 09391\09391_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 09391\09391_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09391\09391_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09391\09391_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09391\09391_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09391\09391_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file x 09391\Supporting Documentation\09391 Follow-Up Question Responses 12.13.10.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

09391\Supporting Documentation\09391_Aerial Maps.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 09391\Supporting Documentation\09391_FGD wastewater study 2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09391\Supporting Documentation\09391_FGD wastewater study.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09391\Supporting Documentation\09391_POND-1 Block Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09391\Supporting Documentation\09391_wastewater study3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09391\Supporting Documentation\09391_Water Balance Diagram 2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09391\Supporting Documentation\09391_Water Balance Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 09391\Supporting Documentation\09391_WWT Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
Exhibit 10.4


 



SUMMARY OF OFFICE LICENSE AGREEMENT







The following is a summary of the principal terms of the occupancy by Lazuriton Nano Biotechnology (U.S.A.) Inc. of those premises located at 10F., No. 341, Sec. 2, Wanshou Rd., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan City 333, Taiwan (Republic of China).








		1.	Commencement of a term of occupancy: June 2, 2015.






		2.	Termination date of occupancy: June 2, 2016.






		3.	Renewal: The Company may renew the occupancy for an additional one year period after December 31, 2016, on the same terms.






		4.	Rent: None.






		5.	Security Deposit: None.






		6.	Size: Approximately 4,270 square feet.






		7.	Use: Office.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 28, 2015. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, July 28, 2015 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A15I0245. TRACY MCCALL GUARINO et al. v. ZELDA ENTERPRISES, LLLP et al..
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 1417049
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6720

ZANNIE JAY LOTHARP,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,

 Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at 

Greensboro. Loretta C. Biggs, District Judge. (1:20-cv-01062-LCB-LPA)

Submitted: January 20, 2022 Decided: January 24, 2022

Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Zannie Jay Lotharp, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Zannie Jay Lotharp appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s 

recommendation and dismissing Lotharp’s civil action. In its order, the court stated that 

Lotharp had filed no objections to the recommendation within the time period prescribed 

by 28 U.S.C. § 636. On appeal, Lotharp claims that he did not receive the recommendation, 

making it impossible to object. He notes that the recommendation was returned to the clerk 

as undeliverable and that, pursuant to M.D.N.C. R. 11.1(b), he had 63 days to notify the 

court of his change in address. 

A party who fails to object in writing to a magistrate judge’s proposed findings of 

fact and conclusions of law is not entitled to de novo review of the magistrate judge’s 

determinations by the district court and is barred from contesting those determinations on 

appeal. Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 

However, the waiver of appellate rights for failing to object is a prudential rule, not a 

jurisdictional requirement. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 154 (1985). When a litigant is 

proceeding pro se, he must be given fair notice of the consequences of failing to object 

before a procedural default will apply. Wright, 766 F.2d at 846-47. 

The record shows that Lotharp never received a copy of the recommendation before 

the district court dismissed his case. Accordingly, we vacate the decision of the district 

court and remand with directions to provide Lotharp with a copy of the recommendation 

and notice of the consequences of failing to object. We deny as moot Lotharp’s motion to 

stay and remand. 
3

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

VACATED AND REMANDED
### §1202. Authority of Secretary; studies, research, and investigations; control measures; execution of program; other actions; costs

In carrying out the purposes of this chapter, the Secretary, in cooperation with the States and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, is authorized (1) to conduct, directly or by contract, such studies, research, and investigations, as he deems desirable, to determine the abundance and distribution of jellyfish and other such pests and their effects on fish and shellfish and water-based recreation, (2) to conduct studies of control measures of such pests and of floating seaweed, (3) to carry out, based on studies made pursuant to this chapter, a program of controlling or eliminating such pests and such seaweed, and (4) to take such other actions as the Secretary deems desirable: Provided, That the costs of such actions shall be borne equally by the Federal Government and by the States and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, acting jointly or severally.

(Pub. L. 89–720, §2, Nov. 2, 1966, 80 Stat. 1149.)
§ 415.40 Administrative agency. ( a ) Class I projects as defined by § 415.20 of this part shall be subject to review and approval by the Commission.
( b ) Class II projects as defined by § 415.21 shall be subject to review and approval by a duly empowered state or local agency; and if there be no such state or local agency at any time on and after January 1, 1978, and only during such time, the Commission may review any such project which has been identified by the Executive Director as having special flood hazards, and: ( 1 ) Is located along the mainstem Delaware River or a major tributary thereof, or
( 2 ) An agency of a signatory party requests such review.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 90 

To limit the establishment or extension of national monuments in the State 

of Utah. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 10, 2019 

Mr. LEE (for himself and Mr. ROMNEY) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

A BILL 

To limit the establishment or extension of national 

monuments in the State of Utah. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protect Utah’s Rural 

5 Economy Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OR EXTEN7 SION OF NATIONAL MONUMENTS IN THE 

8 STATE OF UTAH. 

9 Section 320301 of title 54, United States Code, is 

10 amended by adding at the end the following: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 90 IS

1 ‘‘(e) LIMITATION ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OR EX2 TENSION OF NATIONAL MONUMENTS IN THE STATE OF

3 UTAH.—Notwithstanding any other provision of this sec4 tion, the President may not establish or extend a national 

5 monument in the State of Utah (referred to in this sub6 section as the ‘State’) unless— 

7 ‘‘(1) the extension or establishment has been 

8 authorized by an Act of Congress; and 

9 ‘‘(2) the President has received from the Gov10 ernor of the State notice that the State legislature 

11 has enacted legislation approving the proposed es12 tablishment or extension.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 77 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 77

To amend the Small Business Act to ensure small businesses affected by 
 the onset of transmissible diseases are eligible for disaster relief.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 10, 2019

   Mr. Rubio introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Small Business Act to ensure small businesses affected by 
 the onset of transmissible diseases are eligible for disaster relief.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business Relief From Disease 
Induced Economic Hardship Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    (a) In General.--Section 3(k)(2) of the Small Business Act (15 
U.S.C. 632(k)(2)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in subparagraph (C), striking the period and inserting 
        ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(D) communicable diseases for which the Federal 
        Government issues a travel alert or travel warning.''.
    (b) Applicability.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to a communicable disease--
            (1) for which the Federal Government issues a travel alert 
        or travel warning before, on, or after the date of enactment of 
        this Act; and
            (2) the effects of which are experienced on or after the 
        date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
§ 16.3 Public notice of projects under expiring licenses. In addition to the notice of a licensee's intent to file or not to file an application for a new license provided in § 16.6(d), the Commission will publish, in its annual report and annually in the Federal Register, a table showing the projects whose licenses will expire during the succeeding six years. The table will: ( a ) List the licenses according to their expiration dates; and
( b ) Contain the following information: license expiration date; licensee's name; project number; type of principal project works licensed, *e.g.,* dam and reservoir, powerhouse, transmission lines; location by state, county, and stream; location by city or nearby city when appropriate; whether the existing license is subject to sections 14 and 15 of the Federal Power Act; and plant installed capacity.
#### Lupo *v.*Grantham.

Fish, C. J.

Where a tract of ten acres of land was levied upon and sold under two tax executions aggregating $5.00, and at the time the tax deed made in consummation of such sale was offered in evidence, upon the trial of a case involving the title to such land, no testimony had been introduced in regard to the value of such land at the time of the sale, and from the pleadings and evidence there was enough to be drawn to indicate that the land was not readily capable of division, it was error to exclude such deed from evidence, on the ground of exeessiveness of the levies. This is true although, at a later stage of -the trial, a witness testified that-in the year in which the sale took place the land was worth twenty-five or thirty dollars per acre.

*696June 29, 1910.

Complaint for land. Before Judge Rawlings. Pulaski superior court.

June 7, 1909.

*W. L. & Warren Grice, Ulin J. Wimberly,*and *M. II. Boyer,*for plaintiff in error. *Berberí L. Grice,*contra.

2. There was no evidence that the deed xtnder which the defendant sought to prescribe was a forgery, or that there was any actual fraud; and it was erroneous to charge on those subjects in their relation to prescription. *Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
### §78bbb. Application of Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.] (hereinafter referred to as the "1934 Act") apply as if this chapter constituted an amendment to, and was included as a section of, such Act.

(Pub. L. 91–598, §2, Dec. 30, 1970, 84 Stat. 1637.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 91–598, Dec. 30, 1970, 84 Stat. 1636. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

The Securities Exchange Act of 1934, referred to in text, is act June 6, 1934, ch. 404, 48 Stat. 881, which is classified principally to chapter 2B (§78a et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 78a of this title and Tables.