alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1


              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63
                      OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE


I, Glenn M. Grunewald, the chief executive officer of OnLine Power Supply, Inc.,
certify that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June
30, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form
10-QSB financial statements fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of OnLine Power Supply, Inc.

                                               /s/  Glenn M. Grunewald
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Glenn M. Grunewald,
                                            Chief Executive Officer

                                            Date:  August 13, 2002


<PAGE>





              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63
                      OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE


I, Richard L. Millspaugh, the chief financial officer of OnLine Power Supply,
Inc., certify that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
June 30, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form
10-QSB financial statements fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of OnLine Power Supply, Inc.

                                              /s/  Richard L. Millspaugh
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Richard L. Millspaugh,
                                            Chief Financial Officer

                                            Date:  August 13, 2002
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 862 

AN ACT 

To extend the sunset for collateral requirements for Small 

Business Administration disaster loans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 862 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rebuilding Small Busi3 nesses After Disasters Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF SUNSET FOR COLLATERAL RE5 QUIREMENTS FOR SBA DISASTER LOANS. 

6 Section 2102(b) of the RISE After Disaster Act of 

7 2015 (15 U.S.C. 636 note) is amended, in the matter pre8 ceding paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘4 years’’ and inserting 

9 ‘‘7 years’’. 

10 SEC. 3. GAO REPORT ON DEFAULT RATES. 

11 Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment 

12 of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States 

13 shall submit to the Committee on Small Business and En14 trepreneurship of the Senate and the Committee on Small 

15 Business of the House of Representatives a report com16 paring— 

17 (1) the performance, including the default rate, 

18 of loans made under section 7(b)(1) of the Small 

19 Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)) during the pe20 riod— 

21 (A) beginning on January 1, 2000; and 

22 (B) ending on the date on which the Small 

23 Business Administration began making loans in 

24 accordance with the amendment made by sec25 tion 2102(a) of the RISE After Disaster Act of 

26 2015 (Public Law 114–88; 129 Stat. 690); and 
3 

†S 862 ES

1 (2) the performance, including the default rate, 

2 of loans made under 7(b)(1) of the Small Business 

3 Act (15 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)) in accordance with the 

4 amendment made by section 2102(a) of the RISE 

5 After Disaster Act of 2015 (Public Law 114–88; 

6 129 Stat. 690). 

Passed the Senate August 1, 2019. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 862 

AN ACT 

To extend the sunset for collateral requirements for 

Small Business Administration disaster loans.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 27, 2010
of the Company, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:  May 5, 2010
    /s/ Robert W. HumphreysRobert W. HumphreysChairman and Chief Executive Officer
SCPW-14-0001380

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

JAMES J. NAVAJA, Petitioner,

vs.

STEPHEN JOST, Director; CHRIS ATHERALL; 

JOHN AND JANE DOES, Respondents.

 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(CAAP-14-0001164; CIV. NO. 14-1-1439-06)

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, J.J.)

Upon consideration of Petitioner James J. Navaja’s

petition for writ of prohibition, filed on December 22, 2014, and

the record, it appears that Petitioner’s appeal is pending before

the Intermediate Court of Appeals (“ICA”). If the appeal is

dismissed for nonpayment of the filing fee or if the ICA enters

judgment on the final disposition of the appeal, Petitioner may

seek relief pursuant to HRAP Rule 40.1. A writ of prohibition is

therefore not warranted under the specific facts and

circumstances of this matter. See Honolulu Adv., Inc. v. Takao,

59 Haw. 237, 241, 580 P.2d 58, 62 (1978) (a writ of prohibition

“is an extraordinary remedy . . . to restrain a judge of an

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPW-14-0001380

13-JAN-2015

09:51 AM
inferior court from acting beyond or in excess of his

jurisdiction”). Accordingly, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appellate clerks’ office

shall process the petition for writ of prohibition without

payment of the filing fee.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for a

writ of prohibition is denied. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, January 13, 2015. 

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

2
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO THE RESTATED
                         CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF
                          MANHATTAN BAGEL COMPANY, INC.

To:      The Secretary of State
         State of New Jersey

     Pursuant to the provisions of Section  14A:9-2(4) and Section 14A:9-4(3) of
the New Jersey Business  Corporation Act, the undersigned  corporation  executes
the  following   Certificate  of  Amendment  to  its  Restated   Certificate  of
Incorporation:  
     1. The name of the corporation is Manhattan Bagel Company,  Inc.
     2. The following amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation was adopted 
        by the shareholders of the corporation on the 26th day of June, 1996:
        RESOLVED, that Article 4 of the Amended Certificate of Incorporation be
     amended to read as follows:
             "4)   The aggregate number of shares which the corporation
        shall have authority to issue is as follows:
              a)   Twenty-Five Million (25,000,000) shares common
        with par value; and
              b)   Two Million (2,000,000) shares preferred with such
        designations,  rights,  preferences and limitations,  and such
        divisions and determinations, and such rights as to dividends,
        liquidation,  and voting,  in such class or series,  including
        but not limited to rights of  conversion  at the option of the
        holder  or of the  corporation,  or both,  into  shares of any
        other  class or classes as may be  determined  by the Board of
        Directors without shareholder approval. The Board of Directors
        is  authorized to act under this  provision by its  resolution
        and  cause  to be  executed  and  filed  an  amendment  to the
        certificate of  incorporation as may be necessary or desirable
        to accomplish its action, as authorized by NJSA 14A7-2."
              3.    The number of shares entitled to vote upon the amendment 
        was 7,371,048.
              4.    The number of shares voting for and against such amendment
        is as follows:

#24731

<PAGE>

           Number of Shares                         Number of Shares
         Voting for Amendment                   Voting Against Amendment
              5,652,992                                  743,070

                                                MANHATTAN BAGEL COMPANY, INC.

                                                By: /s/   Jack Grumet
                                                   ---------------------------
                                                    Jack Grumet, Chairman and 
                                                      Chief Executive Officer


                                        2
§ 38.2 Applicability and scope. ( a ) A faith-based organization that applies for, or participates in, a social service program supported with Federal financial assistance may retain its independence and may continue to carry out its mission, including the definition, development, practice, and expression of its religious beliefs, provided that it does not use direct Federal financial assistance, whether received through a prime award or sub-award, to support or engage in any explicitly religious activities, including activities that involve overt religious content such as worship, religious instruction, or proselytization.
( b ) The use of indirect Federal financial assistance is not subject to this restriction.
( c ) Nothing in this part restricts the Department's authority under applicable Federal law to fund activities, such as the provision of chaplaincy services, that can be directly funded by the Government consistent with the Establishment Clause.
( d ) To the extent that any provision of this regulation is declared invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the Department intends for all other provisions that are capable of operating in the absence of the specific provision that has been invalidated to remain in effect.
### SUBCHAPTER IX—COLONIAL NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Daniel R. Luis, certify that: 

1.              I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of GoAmerica,Inc.; 

2.              Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

3.              Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.              The registrant’s other certifying officer and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.              The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: August 14, 2008
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 22, 2020

t0415 

# Order

Clerk April 22, 2020

159748

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 159748

COA: 333535

Macomb CC: 2014

- 003080

- FC

MARK ANTHONY VARNER,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 16, 2019

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
## Breadcrumb

-  Inicio 
-  State Trade Expansion Program (STEP) 

Parte o todo el contenido en esta página disponible solo en inglés.

# State Trade Expansion Program (STEP)

STEP provides financial awards to state and territory governments to assist small businesses with export development. To date, over $200 million has been awarded to assist in growing the volume and value of small business exports.

## Information for small businesses

The STEP grant program has helped thousands of small businesses obtain grants and find customers in the international marketplace since 2011. Through awards to U.S. states and territories, STEP helps small businesses overcome obstacles to exporting by providing grants to cover costs associated with entering and expanding into international markets.  

STEP financial support helps U.S. small businesses:
                - Learn to export
                - Participate in foreign trade missions
                - Design international marketing products and campaigns
                - Support website globalization and e-commerce capabilities
                - Pay for subscriptions to services provided by the U.S. Department of Commerce and other federal agencies
                - Participate in export trade show exhibits and training workshops
                - Cover AI-related expenses in support of export-related activities

Check out the SBA Grants for Global Expansion webinar to learn more about the STEP program.

Ready to apply? Contact your local state or territory to find out how they can help you start or expand your business to reach global customers with the help of a STEP grant.

## Information for state entities

### STEP 11 Fiscal Year 2023 Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO)

SBA is now accepting proposals for funding from eligible state entities that want to provide assistance and guidance to small businesses interested in exporting.  Applications must be received by May 19, 2023.  Please see the funding opportunity listing on grants.gov for more details.

STEP provides financial awards to state and territory governments to assist small businesses with export development. Find information on how eligible state entities can apply for STEP awards to be used to increase small business exporters and their sales in their state:
                - STEP 11 Questions and Answers
                - CFR: Third-party in-kind contributions
                - CFR: Cost sharing or matching
                - STEP annual reports
                - STEP awardee Terms and Conditions   

STEP awards are managed and provided at the local level by state government organizations. The program is managed at the national level by SBA’s Office of International Trade.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 THAT WERE
FILED WITH THE COMPANY'S REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>1,000

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                         (1)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     1
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (1)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (1)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.14



                                  AMENDMENT ONE
                                     TO THE
                            MANAGED NETWORK AGREEMENT
                                     BETWEEN
                       SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, L.P.
                                       AND
                               BRIDGE DATA COMPANY

The  Managed  Network  Agreement  ("Agreement")  between  Sprint  Communications
Company,  L.P.  ("Sprint")  and  Bridge  Data  Company  ("Customer"),  having an
effective date of March 1, 1995, is hereby amended as set forth below.

WHEREAS,  Sprint and Customer have previously  entered into an Agreement for the
provision of managed network services; and

WHEREAS, Customer wishes to procure managed network services internationally.

NOW THEREFORE, the parties mutually agree to the following:

1.       The following  Sections of the Agreement  shall not apply to any orders
         for Canadian services:

         Section 16(e)(i)
         Attachment  D -  Domestic  Installation,  Maintenance,  and  Management
         Services

2.       Attachment  B - Global  Pricing is hereby  revised to  incorporate  the
         enclosed Addendum for Canadian pricing.

3.       Attachment  E  -  Performance   Specifications  is  hereby  revised  to
         incorporate  the  enclosed  Addendum  for Global  Frame  Relay  Service
         performance objectives.

4.       All other terms and  conditions of the  Agreement  shall remain in full
         force and effect, except as expressly stated herein.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  the parties have executed this Amendment One as of the date
of the last signature below.

SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS CO., L.P.                BRIDGE DATA COMPANY

/s/ James Mori                                 /s/ Robert McCormick
---------------------------------              -------------------------------
Signature                                      Signature

Bridge/Sprint Confidential               -1-

<PAGE>

James Mori                                     Robert McCormick
---------------------------------              -------------------------------
Printed Name                                   Printed Name


Regional Director                              Senior Vice President
---------------------------------              -------------------------------
Title                                          Title


8/23/95                                        8/22/95
---------------------------------              -------------------------------
Date                                           Date




Bridge/Sprint Confidential               -2-
HomeLatest FilingsPrevious Page

    - SEC Home  »
    - Search the Next-Generation EDGAR System  »
    - Company Search  »
    - Current Page

225 LIBERTY STREET, 35TH FLOORNEW YORK NY 10281         

225 LIBERTY STREET, 35TH FLOORNEW YORK NY 10281         212-417-7000

Brookfield Infrastructure Income Fund Inc. CIK#: 0001955857 (see all company filings)
State location: NY | Fiscal Year End: 1231formerly: Brookfield Infrastructure Income Fund, Inc. (filings through 2023-06-12)Get **insider transactions** for this **issuer**.File Number: **812-15415**

||
||
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 13, 2014

No. 04-13-00882-CV

Joseph ZAPATA and Maria Banda,

Appellants

v.

WALTER MORTGAGE COMPANY LLC, ET AL.,

Appellees

From the 79th Judicial District Court, Jim Wells County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10-03-48880-CV

Honorable Richard C. Terrell, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The clerk’s record is due on January 13, 2014. On January 6, 2014, the trial court clerk 

filed a Notification of Late Record stating the clerk’s record will not be filed because appellant 

has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the record and that 

appellant is not entitled to appeal without paying the fee. 

It is therefore ORDERED that appellant provide written proof to this court no later than 

January 23, 2014 that either (1) the clerk’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to 

pay the clerk’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the clerk’s fee. If 

appellant fails to file such written proof within the time provided, this appeal will be dismissed 

for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). 

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 13th day of January, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court