alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-3098

_____________________________

LAWAYNE HENDERSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Taylor County.

Gregory S. Parker, Judge.

October 30, 2019

PER CURIAM.

REVERSED. See Simmons v. State, 274 So. 3d 468 (Fla. 1st 

DCA 2019) (holding that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to 

rescind an order granting resentencing once it became a final, 

appealable order, and neither party timely moved for rehearing of 

the order under Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.800(b)(1)(B)).

As in Simmons, we quash the order on appeal and remand 

with directions that the trial court reinstate the order granting 

Appellant’s rule 3.800(a) motion. The trial court should then 

resentence Appellant to a lawful sentence.

OSTERHAUS, BILBREY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Glen P. Gifford, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Damaris E. Reynolds, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
§ 11.11 Definitions. ( a ) *Debt.* Debt means any amount of funds or property that an appropriate official of the Federal Government or a court of competent jurisdiction determines is owed to the United States, including any amounts owed to the United States for the benefit of a third party, by a person, organization, or entity other than another Federal agency. For purposes of this section, the term debt does not include debts arising under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 1 *et seq.*), the tariff laws of the United States, or the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 301 *et seq.*), except that “delinquent amounts” as defined in sections 204(f) and 1631(b)(4) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 404(f) and 1383(b)(4)(A), respectively) are included in the term debt, as are “administrative offset[s]” collectible pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3716(c). Debts that have been referred to the Department of Justice by other agencies for collection are included in this definition.
( b ) *Past due.* A past due debt means a debt that has not been paid or otherwise resolved by the date specified in the initial demand for payment, or in an applicable agreement or other instrument (including a post-delinquency repayment agreement), unless other payment arrangements satisfactory to the Department have been made. Judgment debts remain past due until paid in full.
( c ) *Notice.* Notice means the information sent to the debtor pursuant to § 11.12(b). The date of the notice is the date shown on the notice letter as its date of issuance.
( d ) *Dispute.* A dispute is a written statement supported by documentation or other evidence that all or part of an alleged debt is not past due or legally enforceable, that the amount is not the amount currently owed, that the outstanding debt has been satisfied, or, in the case of a debt reduced to judgment, that the judgment has been satisfied or stayed.
( e ) *Legally enforceable.* Legally enforceable means that there has been a final agency or court determination that the debt, in the amount stated, is due, and there are no legal bars to collection by offset.
[Order No. 1792-93, 58 FR 51223, Oct. 1, 1993, as amended by AG Order 3689-2016, 81 FR 43944, July 6, 2016]
Copyrighted page/s removed. Copyrighted ma terial is not available in Regulations.gov since it may not be reproduced without consent of the copyright holder.

Contact the EPA Docket Center’s P ublic Reading Room to view or receive a copy of this document.

Requests for copies may be made as follows:

In person/writing: Environmental Protection Agency, Docket Center 1301 Constitution Ave NW, 2822T, Room 3334 Washington, DC. 20004

Telephone:

202-566-1744

Fax:

202-566- 9744

Email: docket-customerservice@epa.gov
No. 20,001.

#### Richard R. Helmick *v.*Consolidated Mutual Water Company.

(372 P. [2d] 160)

Decided June 11, 1962.

Mr. Richard R. Helmick, pro se.

Messrs. Tippit & Haskell, Mr. John R. Evans, for plaintiff in error.

Messrs. Henry & Adams, Mr. Richard C. Cockrell, for defendant in error.

*In Department.*

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Pringle.

Plaintiff in error was plaintiff, in the trial court and defendant in error was defendant. They will be referred to here as they there appeared.

Plaintiff is a resident and property owner of Jefferson *244County. He purchases water from the defendant for domestic use. While he was on a summer vacation in 1960 he failed to pay his water bill within 25 days and was thereupon assessed a penalty as prescribed by the rules and regulations of the defendant.

Plaintiff declined to pay the penalty, and during the controversy with the defendant thereover incurred two other penalty assessments by reason of the refusal of defendant to accept further payments until the original penalty assessment was paid. The total amount of the assessments in controversy was $1.51. Thereafter the defendant notified the plaintiff that unless the penalty assessment was paid it would shut off his water.

Plaintiff continued his refusal to pay the penalties and the defendant carried out its threat to discontinue his water service. Thereafter plaintiff brought this action, requesting an injunction to prevent the defendant from discontinuing his water service. A temporary restraining order was issued and the matter set for hearing on temporary injunction.

At the hearing the court dismissed the restraining order, denied the request for injunction and entered judgment for the defendant. Plaintiff is here on writ of error.

Under the Rules of Civil Procedure a new trial or an order dispensing therewith is a prerequisite to the right of a party to a review in this Court. This rule applies in cases where a review is sought of a pure question of law as well as of questions of fact. *Kopff v. Judd,*134 Colo. 330, 304 P. (2d) 623; *Boyd v. Adjustment Bureau, Inc.,*148 Colo. 233, 365 P. (2d) 813.

The record before us discloses that no motion for new trial was ever filed nor was an order dispensing therewith entered by the trial court.

Accordingly, the writ of error is dismissed.

Mr. Justice Hall and Mr. Justice Sutton concur.
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

36 38 40 42



### ★ ▲ ▲

▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 05/29 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 29 May 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.48 N 77.37 WMeters AGL
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 November 13, 2008
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Rocco B. Commisso

Rocco B. CommissoChairman and Chief Executive OfficerBy:
    
    /s/ Mark E. Stephan

Mark E. StephanExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer
### §1702. Establishment

#### (a) Age of participants

To carry out the purposes of this subchapter, there is established in the Department of the Interior and the Department of Agriculture a Youth Conservation Corps (hereinafter in this subchapter referred to as the "Corps"). The Corps shall consist of young men and women who are permanent residents of the United States, its territories, possessions, trust territories, or Commonwealth of Puerto Rico who have attained age fifteen but have not attained age nineteen, and whom the Secretary of the Interior or the Secretary of Agriculture may employ without regard to the civil service or classification laws, rules, or regulations, for the purpose of developing, preserving, or maintaining the lands and waters of the United States.

#### (b) Equal employment opportunity and employment; term

The Corps shall be open to youth from all parts of the country of both sexes and youth of all social, economic, and racial classifications with all Corps members receiving compensation consistent with work accomplished, and with no person being employed as a member of the Corps for a term in excess of ninety days during any single year.

(Pub. L. 91–378, title I, §102, formerly §2, Aug. 13, 1970, 84 Stat. 795; Pub. L. 92–597, Oct. 27, 1972, 86 Stat. 1319; Pub. L. 93–408, Sept. 3, 1974, 88 Stat. 1066; renumbered title I, §102, and amended Pub. L. 103–82, title I, §105(1)–(4), Sept. 21, 1993, 107 Stat. 848.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1993—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–82, §105(2), (4), substituted "subchapter" for "chapter" and inserted "in this subchapter" after "(hereinafter".

1974—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 93–408 extended eligibility to permanent residents of Puerto Rico, removed the restriction that employment be in the summer months only, and substituted "waters of the United States" for "waters of the United States under his jurisdiction".

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 93–408 substituted "from all parts of the country of both sexes and youth of all social, economic, and racial classifications with all Corps members receiving compensation consistent with work accomplished, and with" for "of both sexes and youth of all social, economic, and racial classifications, with".

1972—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 92–597 substituted "established in the Department of the Interior and the Department of Agriculture a Youth Conservation" and "under his jurisdiction" for "hereby established in the Department of the Interior and the Department of Agriculture a three-year pilot program designated as the Youth Conservation" and "under the jurisdiction of the appropriate Secretary" respectively, and extended eligibility to permanent residents of trust territories.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1993 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103–82 effective Oct. 1, 1993, see section 123 of Pub. L. 103–82, set out as a note under section 1701 of this title.
```

[113th Congress Public Law 286]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 128 STAT. 3093]]

Public Law 113-286
113th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To extend temporarily the extended period of protection for members of 
  uniformed services relating to mortgages, mortgage foreclosure, and 
 eviction, and for other purposes. <<NOTE: Dec. 18, 2014 -  [S. 3008]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Foreclosure 
Relief and Extension for Servicemembers Act of 2014. 50 USC app. 501 
note.>> 
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Foreclosure Relief and Extension for 
Servicemembers Act of 2014''.
SEC. 2. TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF EXTENDED PERIOD OF PROTECTIONS FOR 
                    MEMBERS OF UNIFORMED SERVICES RELATING TO 
                    MORTGAGES, MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE, AND EVICTION.

    Section 710(d) of the Honoring America's Veterans and Caring for 
Camp Lejeune Families Act of 2012 (Public Law 112-154; 126 Stat. 
1208) <<NOTE: 50 USC app. 503 note.>>  is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``December 31, 2014'' and 
        inserting ``December 31, 2015''; and
            (2) in paragraph (3), by striking ``January 1, 2015'' and 
        inserting ``January 1, 2016''.

    Approved December 18, 2014.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 3008:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 160 (2014):
            Dec. 11, considered and passed Senate.
            Dec. 12, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 886 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 886

  To amend the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 to make the 
             Reclamation Water Settlements Fund permanent.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 27, 2019

Mr. Udall (for himself, Mr. Heinrich, and Ms. Cortez Masto) introduced 
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 
                    on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 to make the 
             Reclamation Water Settlements Fund permanent.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Indian Water Rights Settlement 
Extension Act''.

SEC. 2. RECLAMATION WATER SETTLEMENTS FUND.

    Section 10501 of the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 (43 
U.S.C. 407) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)(1), by striking ``For each of fiscal 
        years 2020 through 2029'' and inserting ``For fiscal year 2020 
        and each fiscal year thereafter'';
            (2) in subsection (c)--
                    (A) in paragraph (1)(A), by striking ``for each of 
                fiscal years 2020 through 2034'' and inserting ``for 
                fiscal year 2020 and each fiscal year thereafter''; and
                    (B) in paragraph (3)(C), by striking ``for any 
                authorized use'' and all that follows through the 
                period at the end and inserting ``for any use 
                authorized under paragraph (2).''; and
            (3) by striking subsection (f).
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         31,410
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  525,350
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               556,760
<PP&E>                                         1,159,823
<DEPRECIATION>                                 141,446
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,441,376
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          450,000
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    100,000
<COMMON>                                       3,957,058
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,339,610)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,441,376
<SALES>                                        26,239
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               26,250
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               139,322
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (113,072)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (113,072)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (113,072)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.01)



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                  JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                    JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                            3,453,354
<SECURITIES>                                        316,937
<RECEIVABLES>                                     3,673,018
<ALLOWANCES>                                         87,500
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 10,550,431
<PP&E>                                            4,792,959
<DEPRECIATION>                                    2,420,785
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   32,998,980
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             5,300,915
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                             75,083
<OTHER-SE>                                       24,884,858
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     32,998,980
<SALES>                                          50,443,406
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 50,443,406
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    46,646,555
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    (95,708)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  280,961
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   3,701,143
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1,520,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               2,181,143
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2,181,143
<EPS-BASIC>                                            0.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0.32


</TABLE>
The following case in which the Court of Appeals is sued a published opinion has been appealed to the Supreme Court:

1. Justin Sarafin v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Record No. 1753-12-2 Opinion rendere d by Judge Huff on October 8, 2013
§ 115.43 Protective custody. ( a ) Inmates at high risk for sexual victimization shall not be placed in involuntary segregated housing unless an assessment of all available alternatives has been made, and a determination has been made that there is no available alternative means of separation from likely abusers. If a facility cannot conduct such an assessment immediately, the facility may hold the inmate in involuntary segregated housing for less than 24 hours while completing the assessment.
( b ) Inmates placed in segregated housing for this purpose shall have access to programs, privileges, education, and work opportunities to the extent possible. If the facility restricts access to programs, privileges, education, or work opportunities, the facility shall document: ( 1 ) The opportunities that have been limited;
( 2 ) The duration of the limitation; and
( 3 ) The reasons for such limitations.
( c ) The facility shall assign such inmates to involuntary segregated housing only until an alternative means of separation from likely abusers can be arranged, and such an assignment shall not ordinarily exceed a period of 30 days.
( d ) If an involuntary segregated housing assignment is made pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section, the facility shall clearly document: ( 1 ) The basis for the facility's concern for the inmate's safety; and
( 2 ) The reason why no alternative means of separation can be arranged.
( e ) Every 30 days, the facility shall afford each such inmate a review to determine whether there is a continuing need for separation from the general population.
If you have these symptoms, please 

see the front desk immediately.

Patients with COVID-19 may have these symptoms:

Fever Cough

Shortness 

of breath

We may ask you to wear a mask or use tissues to cover your cough, 

and offer you a separate space to wait. 

For more information: cdc.gov/COVID19

315894 March 13, 2020 12:06 PM

Thank you for helping us protect other patients and staff.

If you have these symptoms, 

please see the front desk immediately.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998             SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998             SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       4,404,388               8,903,957
<SECURITIES>                                   968,196                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  568,931               1,547,479
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                  9,697,495               7,920,454
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,774,171              22,299,321
<PP&E>                                      10,134,505               8,328,751
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,827,855               1,794,709
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              27,858,149              29,347,436
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,755,033              12,729,200
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        58,875                  57,758
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,383,984              15,800,258
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                27,858,149              29,347,436
<SALES>                                     69,658,095              83,044,577
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            69,658,095              83,044,577
<CGS>                                       47,939,482              60,277,742
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               47,939,482              60,277,742
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            21,021,056              26,043,294
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             129,161                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (77,406)             (2,426,521)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   790,050               (445,420)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (867,456)             (1,981,101)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.148)                  (.352)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.148)                  (.352)
        

</TABLE>
Mai= INEMENEO 

Moreover, our independent review of the record demonstrates that the 

district court properly dismissed appellant's complaint as to each of the 

nine defendants. 2We therefore 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 

IA-4k\ 

Hardesty 

're/AA 01.-5:cc' 

P arraguirre 

, J. 

cc: Hon. James Todd Russell, District Judge 

Matthew Corzine 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Carson City Clerk 

2Although appellant argued in his opposition to respondents' motion 

to dismiss that he had satisfied the $10,000 jurisdictional threshold by 

requesting punitive damages, appellant would not have been entitled to 

such damages. See NRS 41.035(1). 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A