14948 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 53 / Friday, March 18, 2011 / Notices 

Proposed Rulemaking on disruptive trading 

practices. The order addresses the comments 

by clarifying how the Commission will 

interpret and implement the provisions of 

Section 747. I look forward to hearing from 

the public in response to this proposed 

interpretive order. The comment letters and 

staff roundtable were extremely helpful in 

formulating this proposed order. 

Appendix III 

December 2, 2010 CFTC Staff Roundtable on 

Disruptive Trading Practices 

I. Panel One: Opportunities and Challenges 

to Fair and Equitable Trading 

i. Ensuring Fair and Equitable Trading at the 

Close 

ii. Exploring ‘‘the character of’’ Spoofing 

a. Panelists: John Hyland—U.S. Natural 

Gas Fund; Rajiv Fernando—Chopper Trading 

LLC; Adam Nunes—Hudson River Trading 

Group; Cameron Smith—Quantlab Financial, 

LLC; Liam Connell—Allston Trading, LLC; 

Don Wilson—DRW Trading Group; Joel 

Hasbrouck—New York University; Gary 

DeWaal—Newedge USA, LLC; Mark Fisher— 

MBF Clearing Corp; John Lothian—John J. 

Lothian & Company. 

II. Panel Two: Rules ‘‘Reasonably Necessary’’ 

To Prohibit Disruptive Trading 

a. Panelists: Tom Gira—Financial Industry 

Regulatory Authority; Chris Heymeyer— 

National Futures Association; Ike Gibbs— 

ConocoPhillips; Dean Payton—Chicago 

Mercantile Exchange; Mark Fabian— 

IntercontinentalExchange; Joe Mecane—New 

York Stock Exchange; Greg Mocek— 

McDermott Will & Emery; Ken Raisler on 

behalf of Futures Industry Association— 

Sullivan and Cromwell LLP; Micah Green— 

Patton Boggs LLP; Tyson Slocum—Public 

Citizen; Andrew Lo—Massachusetts Institute 

of Technology. 

III. Panel Three: Exchange Perspectives on 

Disruptive Trading; Potential New 

Disruptive Trading Practices 

a. Panelists: Tom Gira—Financial Industry 

Regulatory Authority; Chris Heymeyer— 

National Futures Association; Dean Payton— 

Chicago Mercantile Exchange; Mark Fabian— 

IntercontinentalExchange; Joe Mecane—New 

York Stock Exchange; Andrew Lo— 

Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 

Appendix IV 

Parties Submitting Comment Letters in 

Response to Disruptive Trading Practices 

ANPR 

A. Flachman 

American Petroleum Institute (API) 

Argus Media, Inc. (Argus) 

Better Markets (BM) 

Bix Weir 

Chopper Trading, LLC (Chopper Trading) 

CME Group, Inc. (CME Group) 

Commodity Markets Council (CMC) 

David S. Nichols 

DeWitt Brown 

Edison Electric Institute (EEI) 

Emilie Lauran 

Futures Industry Association (FIA) 

Hess Energy Trading Company, LLC 

(HETCO) 

IntercontinentalExchange, Inc., and ICE 

Futures U.S., Inc. (collectively, ICE) 

International Swaps and Derivatives 

Association, Inc. (ISDA) 

Investment Company Institute (ICI) 

Managed Funds Association (MFA) 

Minneapolis Grain Exchange, Inc. (MGEX) 

Newedge USA, LLC (Newedge USA) 

Nicole Provo 

Peter J. Carini 

Petroleum Marketers Association of America 

(PMAA) 

Rebecca Washington 

Securities Industry and Financial Markets 

Association (SIFMA) 

U.S. Senator Carl Levin 

West Virginia Oil Marketers & Grocers 

Association (OMEGA) 

Working Group of Commercial Energy Firms 

(CEF) 

[FR Doc. 2011–6398 Filed 3–17–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6351–01–P 

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY 

COMMISSION 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Proposed Collection; 

Comment Request; Generic Clearance 

for the Collection of Qualitative 

Feedback on Agency Service Delivery 

AGENCY: U.S. Consumer Product Safety 

Commission. 

ACTION: 30-Day notice of submission of 

information collection approval from 

the Office of Management and Budget 

and request for comments. 

SUMMARY: As part of a Federal 

Government-wide effort to streamline 

the process to seek feedback from the 

public on service delivery, the U.S. 

Consumer Product Safety Commission 

(‘‘CPSC,’’ ‘‘Commission,’’ or ‘‘we’’) has 

submitted a Generic Information 

Collection Request (Generic ICR): 

‘‘Generic Clearance for the Collection of 

Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service 

Delivery’’ to OMB for approval under 

the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et. seq.). 

DATES: Comments must be submitted 

April 18, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: Written comments may be 

faxed to the Office of Information and 

Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: CPSC 

Desk Officer, FAX: 202–395–6974, or emailed to 

oira_submission@omb.eop.gov. All 

comments should be identified by the 

CPSC Docket No. CPSC [ ] and the title 

‘‘Generic Clearance for the Collection of 

Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service 

Delivery.’’ The written comments should 

also be submitted to the CPSC, 

identified by Docket No. CPSC [ ], by 

any of the following methods: Submit 

electronic comments in the following 

way: Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

To ensure timely processing of 

comments, the Commission is no longer 

accepting comments submitted by 

electronic mail (e-mail) except through 

http://www.regulations.gov. 

Submit written submissions in the 

following way: 

Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for 

paper, disk, or CD–ROM submissions), 

preferably in five copies, to: Office of 

the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product 

Safety Commission, Room 502, 4330 

East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 

20814; telephone (301) 504–7923. 

Instructions: All submissions received 

must include the agency name and 

docket number for this notice. All 

comments received may be posted 

without change, including any personal 

identifiers, contact information, or other 

personal information provided, to 

http://www.regulations.gov. Do not 

submit confidential business 

information, trade secret information, or 

other sensitive or protected information 

electronically. Such information should 

be submitted in writing. 

Docket: For access to the docket to 

read background documents or 

comments received, go to http:// 

www.regulations.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Linda Glatz, Division of Policy and 

Planning, Office of Information 

Technology and Technology Services, 

U.S. Consumer Product Safety 

Commission, 4330 East West Highway, 

Bethesda, MD 20814 telephone: 301– 

504–7671 or e-mail: lglatz@cpsc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the 

Federal Register of December 22, 2010 

(75 FR 80542), the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) 

published a notice (‘‘OMB notice’’) 

stating that, as part of a Federal 

Government-wide effort to streamline 

the process to seek feedback from the 

public on service delivery, OMB is 

coordinating the development of a 

proposed Generic Information 

Collection Request titled, ‘‘Generic 

Clearance for the Collection of 

Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service 

Delivery’’ for approval under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et. seq.). The OMB notice 

announced that agencies (including the 

CPSC) intend to submit this collection 

to OMB for approval and also invited 

comments on specific aspects for the 

proposed information collection. The 

OMB notice also provided an estimated 

information collection burden and 

stated that agencies would provide more 


Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 53 / Friday, March 18, 2011 / Notices 14949 

1The 60-day notice included the following 

estimate of the aggregate burden hours for this 

generic clearance federal-wide: Average Expected 

Annual Number of activities: 25,000. Average 

number of Respondents per Activity: 200. Annual 

responses: 5,000,000. Frequency of Response: Once 

per request. Average minutes per response: 30. 

Burden hours: 2,500,000. 

refined individual estimates of burden 

in subsequent notices (75 FR at 80543). 

The OMB notice also provided a 60-day 

comment period. 

This notice constitutes the CPSC’s 

refined individual estimates of the 

information collection burden regarding 

generic clearance for the collection of 

qualitative feedback on agency service 

delivery. In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 

3507, we have submitted the following 

proposed collection of information to 

OMB for review and clearance. 

Title: Generic Clearance for the 

Collection of Qualitative Feedback on 

Agency Service Delivery. 

Abstract: The information collection 

activity will garner qualitative customer 

and stakeholder feedback in an efficient, 

timely manner, in accordance with the 

Administration’s commitment to 

improving service delivery. By 

qualitative feedback, we mean 

information that provides useful 

insights on perceptions and opinions, 

but not statistical surveys that yield 

quantitative results that can be 

generalized to the population of study. 

This feedback will provide insights into 

customer or stakeholder perceptions, 

experiences and expectations; provide 

an early warning of issues with service; 

or focus attention on areas where 

communication, training, or changes in 

operations might improve delivery of 

products or services. These collections 

will allow for ongoing, collaborative and 

actionable communications between the 

CPSC and its customers and 

stakeholders. It will also allow feedback 

to contribute directly to the 

improvement of program management. 

Feedback collected under this generic 

clearance will provide useful 

information, but it will not yield data 

that can be generalized to the overall 

population. This type of generic 

clearance for qualitative information 

will not be used for quantitative 

information collections that are 

designed to yield reliably actionable 

results, such as monitoring trends over 

time or documenting program 

performance. Such data uses require 

more rigorous designs that address: the 

target population to which 

generalizations will be made, the 

sampling frame, the sample design 

(including stratification and clustering), 

the precision requirements or power 

calculations that justify the proposed 

sample size, the expected response rate, 

methods for assessing potential nonresponse bias, the protocols for data 

collection, and any testing procedures 

that were or will be undertaken prior to 

fielding the study. Depending on the 

degree of influence the results are likely 

to have, such collections may still be 

eligible for submission for other generic 

mechanisms that are designed to yield 

quantitative results. 

We received no comments in response 

to the 60-day notice published by OMB 

in the Federal Register on December 22, 

2010 (75 FR 80542). 

Below we provide our projected 

average annual estimates for the next 

three years: 1

Current Actions: New collection of 

information. 

Type of Review: New collection. 

Affected Public: Individuals and 

Households, Businesses and 

Organizations, State, Local or Tribal 

Government. 

Average Expected Number of 

Activities: Eight activities including 

qualitative surveys, focus groups, 

customer satisfaction surveys and 

usability tests. 

Annual Number of Respondents: 

1,600. 

Annual Responses: 1,600. 

Frequency of Response: Once per 

request. 

Average Minutes per Response: 45 

minutes per response. 

Annual Burden Hours: 1,200. 

An agency may not conduct or 

sponsor, and a person is not required to 

respond to, a collection of information 

unless it displays a currently valid 

Office of Management and Budget 

control number. 

Dated: March 14, 2011. 

Todd A. Stevenson, 

Secretary, Consumer Product Safety 

Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2011–6442 Filed 3–17–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6355–01–P 

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY 

COMMISSION 

Sunshine Act Meeting Notice 

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, March 23, 

2011, 10 a.m.–12 Noon. 

PLACE: Hearing Room 420, Bethesda 

Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 

Bethesda, Maryland. 

STATUS: Commission Meeting—Open to 

the Public. 

MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Briefing Matter: Bed Rails—Notice of 

Proposed Rulemaking. 

A live Webcast of the Meeting can be 

viewed at http://www.cpsc.gov/webcast. 

For a recorded message containing the 

latest agenda information, call (301) 

504–7948. 

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 

Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product 

Safety Commission, 4330 East West 

Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 

504–7923. 

Dated: March 15, 2011. 

Todd A. Stevenson, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2011–6547 Filed 3–16–11; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6355–01–P 

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY 

COMMISSION 

Sunshine Act Meeting Notice 

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, March 23, 

2011; 2 p.m.–3 p.m. 

PLACE: Hearing Room 420, Bethesda 

Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 

Bethesda, Maryland. 

STATUS: Closed to the Public. 

MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Compliance Status Report 

The Commission staff will brief the 

Commission on the status of compliance 

matters. 

For a recorded message containing the 

latest agenda information, call (301) 

504–7948. 

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 

Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product 

Safety Commission, 4330 East West 

Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 

504–7923. 

Dated: March 15, 2011. 

Todd A Stevenson, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2011–6548 Filed 3–16–11; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6355–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

Defense Acquisition University 

Industry Day: ‘‘Better Buying Power’’ 

Initiatives 

AGENCY: Defense Acquisition 

University, DoD. 

ACTION: Event notice. 

SUMMARY: Mrs. Katrina McFarland, 

President, Defense Acquisition 

University (DAU), will host a forum to 

discuss implementation of Better 

Buying Power: Guidance for Obtaining 

Greater Efficiency and Productivity in 

Defense Spending, outlined in the Dr. 


Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES