alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# 

# SAMPLE PRESS RELEASE

**[PRINT ON PROGRAM LETTERHEAD OR NATIONAL PREVENTION WEEK LETTERHEAD, OR INSERT PROGRAM LOGO HERE]**

**FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:** [DISTRIBUTION DATE] 

**CONTACT:** [NAME OF PRESS CONTACT] [PHONE NUMBER], [EMAIL] 

### [YOUR CITY]-Based [ORGANIZATION NAME] Joins National prevention week Celebrations Across the Country

#### [oRGANIZATION NAME] TO HOST [EVENT NAME] ON [DATE]

**[CITY, State]** — Today, [ORGANIZATION NAME] will join communities across the country in celebrating the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration’s (SAMHSA) National Prevention Week 2024 to increase public awareness of, and action around, mental and substance misuse disorders.

Each year, SAMHSA’s National Prevention Week showcases the work of communities and organizations across the country dedicated to raising awareness about the importance of substance misuse prevention and positive mental health. National Prevention Week celebrates these year-round initiatives, and the possibilities prevention brings. This year, National Prevention Week [will take/took] place May 12–18.

To encourage healthy decision-making, celebrate prevention, and bring together our community, [ORGANIZATION]****is partnering with [COLLABORATING ORGANIZATION(S)]****to host [EVENT OR ACTIVITY] on****[DATE]. [EVENT OR ACTIVITY]****will [DESCRIBE HOW THE EVENT WILL SERVE THE COMMUNITY—EDUCATE, SHOWCASE LOCAL RESOURCES, RAISE AWARENESS, ETC.].****

“SAMHSA’s National Prevention Week is an opportunity for us to join communities across the country to celebrate the communities and organizations that make a positive impact on 

substance misuse prevention,” said [NAME AND TITLE OF PROGRAM SPOKESPERSON]. “Substance misuse prevention begins with each of us, and we all have the power to foster a healthier future for ourselves and those we care about.”

SAMHSA’s National Prevention Week echoes a key message of the 2016 *Surgeon General’s Report on Alcohol, Drugs, and Health*: We can shift the way society thinks about substance misuse and substance use disorders while identifying actions that individuals and communities can take to prevent and treat these conditions. [ORGANIZATION]****is proud to be one of many organizations around the country encouraging people to raise awareness about the importance of substance misuse prevention and mental health promotion in their communities as part of National Prevention Week.

For more information on [EVENT OR ACTIVITY], visit [LINK]. [EVENT OR ACTIVITY]****is free to the public; no registration necessary.

If you would like more information about [ORGANIZATION], visit [LINK].****

+++

[SHORT DESCRIPTION OF YOUR ORGANIZATION: WHAT IT IS, WHEN IT WAS ESTABLISHED, HOW IT IS FUNDED, WHY IT EXISTS, WHOM IT HELPS, AND ITS GEOGRAPHICAL SERVICE AREA]

# image1.jpeg
Order entered August 28, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01621-CR

No. 05-12-01622-CR

JOSHUA PULLIAM-ROBERTS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F12-34121-J, F12-34219-J

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeals.

On July 8, 2013, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why appellant’s 

brief has not been filed. We ADOPT the findings that: (1) appellant desires to pursue the 

appeals; (2) appellant is indigent and is represented by appointed counsel Nanette Hendrickson 

of the Dallas County Public Defender’s Office; (3) Ms. Hendrickson’s explanation for the delay 

in filing appellant’s brief is her workload; and (4) Ms. Hendrickson requested an additional thirty 

days from the August 12, 2013 hearing to file appellant’s brief.

We ORDER appellant to file his brief by SEPTEMBER 13, 2013. Because appellant’s 

brief is already more than two months overdue, no further extensions will be granted. If 
appellant’s brief is not filed by the date specified, the Court will order Nanette Hendrickson and 

the Dallas County Public Defender’s Office removed as appellant’s counsel and will order the 

trial court to appoint new counsel to represent appellant in these appeals.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the 

Honorable Gracie Lewis, Presiding Judge, Criminal District Court No. 3; Katherine Drew, 

Appellate-Chief, Dallas County Public Defender’s Office; Nanette Hendrickson, Dallas County 

Public Defender’s Office; and the Dallas County District Attorney’s Office.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>MAR-31-1999 
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          73,246
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,363
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     10,153
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               104,198
<PP&E>                                          61,763
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,852
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 160,790
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           47,122
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           198
<OTHER-SE>                                      94,496
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   160,790
<SALES>                                        152,158
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               152,158
<CGS>                                          139,888
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  139,888
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 228
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,612
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,699
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,913
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    800
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,113
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.37
        


</TABLE>
NLCP Fee Schedule* 

Effective Date: July 10, 2007 

The NLCP fee schedule is as follows: 

 Fee ($)

Application 2,000 

Inspections 

Initial 11,200 

3-month Second Initial 11,200 

Maintenance 

Category 0 9,000 

Category 1 11,200 

Category 2 16,300 

Category 3 24,800 

Category 4 38,000 

Category 5 - Inspection 38,000 

Category 5 - Audit 24,800 

Special Actual Cost 

Remedial Action 

 Pre-inspection 1,000 

 Post-inspection 3,000 

Performance Testing 

Initial Set 3,000 

Maintenance Set 3,000 

Remedial Action 

 Major 3,000 

 Minor 1,000 

Lab Withdrawal 9,900 – 16,300 

(Final Audit Inspection) 

* From NLCP Program Document #44 dated April 25, 2007
§ 2.44 Summons to appear or warrant for retaking of parolee. ( a ) If a parolee is alleged to have violated the conditions of his release, and satisfactory evidence thereof is presented, the Commission or a member thereof may: ( 1 ) Issue a summons requiring the offender to appear for a preliminary interview or local revocation hearing.
( 2 ) Issue a warrant for the apprehension and return of the offender to custody. A summons or warrant may be issued or withdrawn only by the Commission, or a member thereof.
( b ) Any summons or warrant under this section shall be issued as soon as practicable after the alleged violation is reported to the Commission, except when delay is deemed necessary. Issuance of a summons or warrant may be withheld until the frequency or seriousness of violations, in the opinion of the Commission, requires such issuance. In the case of any parolee charged with a criminal offense and awaiting disposition of the charge, issuance of a summons or warrant may be withheld, a warrant may be issued and held in abeyance, or a warrant may be issued and a detainer may be placed.
( c ) A summons or warrant may be issued only within the prisoner's maximum term or terms except that in the case of a prisoner released as if on parole pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4164, such summons or warrant may be issued only within the maximum term or terms, less one hundred eighty days. A summons or warrant shall be considered issued when signed and either— ( 1 ) Placed in the mail or
( 2 ) Sent by electronic transmission to the intended authorities.
( d ) The issuance of a warrant under this section operates to bar the expiration of the parolee's sentence. Such warrant maintains the Commission's jurisdiction to retake the parolee either before or after the normal expiration date of the sentence and to reach a final decision as to revocation of parole and forfeiture of time pursuant to § 2.52(c).
( e ) A summons or warrant issued pursuant to this section shall be accompanied by a statement of the charges against the parolee, the applicable procedural rights under the Commission's regulations and the possible actions which may be taken by the Commission. A summons shall specify the time and place the parolee shall appear for a revocation hearing. Failure to appear in response to a summons shall be grounds for issuance of a warrant.
[42 FR 39809, Aug. 5, 1977, as amended at 45 FR 84055, Dec. 22, 1980; 54 FR 11688, Mar. 21, 1989; 63 FR 25771, May 11, 1998]
###### Editorial Note on Part 0

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 0 appear at 73 FR 73 FR 54947, Sept. 24, 2008.

#### § 0.32 Applicability of existing departmental regulations.

Departmental regulations which are generally applicable to units or personnel of the Department of Justice shall be applicable with respect to the Community Relations Service and to the Director and personnel thereof, except to the extent, if any, that such regulations may be inconsistent with the intent and purposes of section 1003(b) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
### §7218. Accounting standards

#### (a) Omitted

#### (b) Commission authority

The Commission shall promulgate such rules and regulations to carry out section 77s(b) of this title as it deems necessary or appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of investors.

#### (c) No effect on Commission powers

Nothing in this Act, including this section and the amendment made by this section, shall be construed to impair or limit the authority of the Commission to establish accounting principles or standards for purposes of enforcement of the securities laws.

#### (d) Study and report on adopting principles-based accounting

#### (1) Study

#### (A) In general

The Commission shall conduct a study on the adoption by the United States financial reporting system of a principles-based accounting system.

#### (B) Study topics

The study required by subparagraph (A) shall include an examination of—

(i) the extent to which principles-based accounting and financial reporting exists in the United States;

(ii) the length of time required for change from a rules-based to a principles-based financial reporting system;

(iii) the feasibility of and proposed methods by which a principles-based system may be implemented; and

(iv) a thorough economic analysis of the implementation of a principles-based system.

#### (2) Report

Not later than 1 year after July 30, 2002, the Commission shall submit a report on the results of the study required by paragraph (1) to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives.

(Pub. L. 107–204, title I, §108, July 30, 2002, 116 Stat. 768.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in subsec. (c), is Pub. L. 107–204, July 30, 2002, 116 Stat. 745, known as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

Section is comprised of section 108 of Pub. L. 107–204. Subsec. (a) of section 108 of Pub. L. 107–204 amended section 77s of this title.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than March 31, 2011.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:

                    1.                     *Ralph C. Stayer and Shelly A. Stayer, and the RFS 2010 Irrevocable Trust F/B/O Ralph C. Stayer,*                     all of Naples, Florida; to acquire voting shares of Hometown Bancorp, Ltd., and thereby indirectly acquire control of Hometown Bank, both of Fond du Lac, Wisconsin.                

B. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Glenda Wilson, Community Affairs Officer) P.O. Box 442, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:

                    1.                     *The Greenwood Childrens' Trust, Brentwood, Tennessee, with Jane Allison Crewse, Brentwood, Tennessee; Ann Greenwood Watson, Owensboro, Kentucky; Helen Virginia Futvoye, Jackson, Mississippi; and William Lawton Greenwood, Columbia, South Carolina, as trustees;*                     to retain control of First United, Inc., and thereby indirectly retain control of First National Bank of Muhlenberg County, Kentucky, both of Central City, Kentucky.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 11, 2011.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2011-6108 Filed 3-15-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Exhibit 20.1


Chase Manhattan Grantor Trust 1995-A

From: The Chase Manhattan Bank

To:   Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.


                   MONTHLY CERTIFICATEHOLDER'S REPORT
                   ----------------------------------

Due Period 28 Beginning Date                     12/01/1997
Due Period 28 End Date                           12/31/1997
Determination Date                               01/09/1998
Remittance Date                                  01/15/1998


I.    Monthly Principal and Principal Carryover Shortfall to Certificateholders
      (Per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                  $ 17.4217666940

II.   Monthly Interest and Unpaid Interest to Certificateholders
      (Per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                   $ 1.2941463282

III.  Monthly Expenses Summary

      A. Servicing Fee Disbursement                                $ 323,609.84
      B. Cash Collateral Account Expense                                 $ 0.00
      C. Total Expenses paid
         (per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                $ 0.2156910525

IV.   Cash Collateral Account Deposit Amount                             $ 0.00

V.    Outstanding Advance Summary

      A. From Prior Period                                       $ 4,008,909.18
      B. From Current Period                                     $ 4,006,549.25
      C. Change in Amount Between Periods (Lines B - A)             $ -2,359.93

VI.   Pool Factor Information

      A. Certificate Principal Balance                         $ 362,193,243.92
      B. Initial Certificate Balance                         $ 1,500,339,658.38
      C. Pool Factor (Lines A / B)                               0.241407498560

VII.  Available Cash Collateral Account Information for Due Period

      A. Available Cash Collateral Amount                       $ 19,416,590.57
      B. Available Cash Collateral Amount Percentage            4.999999999871%

VIII. Required Cash Collateral Amount

      A. For the Current Collection Period                      $ 19,416,590.57
      B. For the Next Collection Period                         $ 18,109,662.20
### §141c. Disposal of surplus buffalo and elk

(a) The Secretary of the Interior is authorized, in his discretion and under regulations to be prescribed by him, to sell or otherwise dispose of the surplus buffalo and elk of the Wind Cave National Park herd.

(b) All moneys received from the sale of any such surplus animals, or products thereof, shall be deposited in the Treasury of the United States as miscellaneous receipts.

(June 16, 1938, ch. 459, §§1, 2, 52 Stat. 708.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Subsecs. (a) and (b) of this section constitute sections 1 and 2, respectively, of act June 16, 1938.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21
 
                      SUBSIDIARIES OF EXECUTIVE RISK INC.
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     CHARTERING
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                                  JURISDICTION         PERCENT OWNED
------------------                                 --------------        -------------
<S>                                                <C>                   <C>
Executive Risk Inc. Subsidiaries
  Executive Risk Management Associates*             Connecticut               70%
     (underwriting and claims agency)
  Executive Re Inc.                                   Delaware               100%
     (middle-level holding company)
Executive Re Inc. Subsidiaries
  -- Executive Risk Management Associates*          Connecticut               30%
  -- Executive Risk                                 Netherlands              100%
       International Holdings BV
       (mid-level holding co.)
     Executive Risk I.H. BV subsidiary
     -- Executive Risk N.V.                         Netherlands              100%
          (Netherlands insurer)
  -- Executive Risk (Bermuda) Ltd.                    Bermuda                100%
       (Bermuda insurer)
  -- Sullivan Kelly Inc.                             California              100%
       (underwriting manager)
     Sullivan Kelly Inc. subsidiary
     -- Sullivan Kelly of Arizona, Inc.               Arizona                100%
  -- Executive Risk Indemnity Inc.                    Delaware               100%
       (admitted insurance company)
     Executive Risk Indemnity Inc. subsidiaries
       -- Executive Risk Specialty
            Insurance Company                       Connecticut              100%
            (surplus lines company)
       -- Quadrant Indemnity Company                Connecticut              100%
            (admitted insurance company)
       -- Western Risk Insurance                     California              100%
            Company (in formation)
  -- Talcott Services Corporation                   Connecticut              100%
  -- Executive Risk Limited                        United Kingdom            100%
</TABLE>
 
---------------
*Connecticut general partnership.
### Part V—Other Conservation Programs
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 939 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 939

To establish limitations regarding Confucius Institutes, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 28, 2019

  Mr. Kennedy introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To establish limitations regarding Confucius Institutes, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Concerns Over Nations Funding 
University Campus Institutes in the United States Act'' or the 
``CONFUCIUS Act''.

SEC. 2. RESTRICTIONS ON CONFUCIUS INSTITUTES.

    (a) Definition.--In this section, the term ``Confucius Institute'' 
means a cultural institute directly or indirectly funded by the 
Government of the People's Republic of China.
    (b) Restrictions on Confucius Institutes.--An institution of higher 
education or other postsecondary educational institution (referred to 
in this section as an ``institution'') shall not be eligible to receive 
Federal funds from the Department of Education (except funds under 
title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1070 et seq.) 
or other Department of Education funds that are provided directly to 
students) unless the institution ensures that any contract or agreement 
between the institution and a Confucius Institute includes clear 
provisions that--
            (1) protect academic freedom at the institution;
            (2) prohibit the application of any foreign law on any 
        campus of the institution; and
            (3) grant full managerial authority of the Confucius 
        Institute to the institution, including full control over what 
        is being taught, the activities carried out, the research 
        grants that are made, and who is employed at the Confucius 
        Institute.
                                 <all>
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Document Search 
-  Portland Lender List 

# Portland Lender List

## About this document and download

  Download  .pdf

**Effective**

**Owned by**