alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013260EN.01000901.xml

| 7.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 July 2013 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Hannover, Verwaltungsgericht Karlsruhe — Germany) — Laurence Prinz v Region Hannover (C-523/11), and Philipp Seeberger v Studentenwerk Heidelberg (C-585/11)

(Joined Cases C-523/11 and C-585/11) (1)

1

(Citizenship of the Union - Articles 20 TFEU and 21 TFEU - Right of freedom of movement and residence - Education or training grant awarded to nationals of a Member State in order to pursue their studies in another Member State - Requirement of residence in the home Member State for at least three years prior to the commencement of studies)

2013/C 260/15

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Hannover, Verwaltungsgericht Karlsruhe

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Laurence Prinz (C-523/11), Philipp Seeberger (C-585/11)

Applicants:

Defendants: Region Hannover (C-523/11), and Studentenwerk Heidelberg (C-585/11)

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

Requests for a preliminary ruling — Verwaltungsgericht Hannover — Interpretation of Articles 20 TFEU and 21 TFEU — Receipt of an education or training grant (‘Ausbildungsförderung’) — National rules limiting receipt of that grant to one year for citizens who pursue their studies abroad and reside for less than three years prior to the commencement of their studies in a national territory

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 20 TFEU and 21 TFEU must be interpreted as meaning that they preclude legislation of a Member State which makes the award of an education grant for studies in another Member State for a period of more than one year subject to a sole condition, such as that laid down in Paragraph 16(3) of the Federal Law on assistance for education and training [Bundesgesetz über individuelle Förderung der Ausbildung (Bundesausbildungsförderungsgesetz)], as amended on 1 January 2008, by the twenty-second law amending the Federal Law on assistance for education and training, requiring the applicant to have had a permanent residence, within the meaning of that law, in national territory for at least three years before commencing those studies.

---

(1)  OJ C 13, 14.1.2012.

1

OJ C 49, 18.2.2012.

---
### §1675. Authorization of appropriations; criteria for eligibility of States for funds

There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this subchapter $30,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2002 through 2023. Generally, States shall be eligible for funds appropriated under this subchapter according to the respective capabilities of their private forests and rangelands for yielding renewable resources and relative needs for such resources identified in the periodic Renewable Resource Assessment provided for in section 1601 of this title and the periodic appraisal of land and water resources provided for in section 2004 of this title.

(Pub. L. 95–306, §6, June 30, 1978, 92 Stat. 352; Pub. L. 100–231, §2(1), Jan. 5, 1988, 101 Stat. 1565; Pub. L. 105–185, title III, §301(h), June 23, 1998, 112 Stat. 563; Pub. L. 107–171, title VIII, §8101(b)(1), May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 474; Pub. L. 110–234, title VII, §7413(a), May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1256; Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title VII, §7413(a), June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 2017; Pub. L. 113–79, title VII, §7405(a), Feb. 7, 2014, 128 Stat. 898; Pub. L. 115–334, title VII, §7509(a), Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4824.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 110–234 and Pub. L. 110–246 made identical amendments to this section. The amendments by Pub. L. 110–234 were repealed by section 4(a) of Pub. L. 110–246.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–334 substituted "2023" for "2018".

2014—Pub. L. 113–79 substituted "2018" for "2012".

2008—Pub. L. 110–246, §7413(a), substituted "2012" for "2007" in first sentence.

2002—Pub. L. 107–171 substituted "There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this subchapter $30,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2002 through 2007." for "There are authorized to be appropriated to implement this subchapter $15,000,000 for each of fiscal years 1987 through 2002."

1998—Pub. L. 105–185 substituted "each of fiscal years 1987 through 2002." for "the fiscal year ending September 30, 1988, and $15,000,000 for each of the next twelve fiscal years."

1988—Pub. L. 100–231 amended first sentence generally, substituting "1988" for "1979" and "twelve" for "nine".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2008 Amendment

Amendment of this section and repeal of Pub. L. 110–234 by Pub. L. 110–246 effective May 22, 2008, the date of enactment of Pub. L. 110–234, see section 4 of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as an Effective Date note under section 8701 of Title 7, Agriculture.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 988 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to prohibit prescription 

drug plan sponsors and MA–PD organizations under the Medicare program from retroactively reducing payment on clean claims submitted 

by pharmacies. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 2, 2019 

Mrs. CAPITO (for herself and Mr. TESTER) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to prohibit 

prescription drug plan sponsors and MA–PD organizations under the Medicare program from retroactively reducing payment on clean claims submitted by pharmacies. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Improving Trans5 parency and Accuracy in Medicare Part D Spending Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 988 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITING MEDICARE PDP SPONSORS AND MA– 

2 PD ORGANIZATIONS FROM RETROACTIVELY 

3 REDUCING PAYMENT ON CLEAN CLAIMS SUB4 MITTED BY PHARMACIES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1860D–12(b)(4)(A) of 

6 the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–112(b)(4)(A)) 

7 is amended by adding at the end the following new clause: 

8 ‘‘(iv) PROHIBITING RETROACTIVE RE9 DUCTIONS IN PAYMENTS ON CLEAN

10 CLAIMS.—Each contract entered into with 

11 a PDP sponsor under this part with re12 spect to a prescription drug plan offered 

13 by such sponsor shall provide that after 

14 the date of receipt of a clean claim sub15 mitted by a pharmacy, the PDP sponsor 

16 (or an agent of the PDP sponsor) may not 

17 retroactively reduce payment on such claim 

18 directly or indirectly through aggregated 

19 effective rate or otherwise except in the 

20 case such claim is found to not be a clean 

21 claim (such as in the case of a claim lack22 ing required substantiating documentation) 

23 during the course of a routine audit as 

24 permitted pursuant to written agreement 

25 between the PDP sponsor (or such an 

26 agent) and such pharmacy. The previous 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•S 988 IS

1 sentence shall not prohibit any retroactive 

2 increase in payment to a pharmacy pursu3 ant to a written agreement between a PDP 

4 sponsor (or an agent of such sponsor) and 

5 such pharmacy.’’. 

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

7 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to contracts entered 

8 into on or after January 1, 2020. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
# C_2010179EN.01004102.xml

| 3.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/41

---

Action brought on 12 April 2010 — ARA v OHIM — Allrounder (Representation of the letter ‘A’ with two horns)

(Case T-174/10)

(2010/C 179/73)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: ara AG (Langenfeld, Germany) (represented by: M. Gail, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Allrounder SARL (Saarburg, France)

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 26 January 2010 in case R 481/2009-1; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 26 January 2010 in case R 481/2009-1; and

| — | Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Allrounder SARL.

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark, representing the letter ‘A’ with two horns, for goods in Classes 18 and 25.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant.

Mark or sign cited in opposition: In particular, a word mark ‘A’ for goods in Classes 18 and 25.

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition rejected.

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Action dismissed.

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, (1) since there is a likelihood of confusion between the opposing marks.

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

---
#### Leonard Morris *v.*The Indianapolis, Bloomington and Western Railway Company

*Revocation—of license, for breach of conditions subsequent.*Where the owner of land executed an agreement with a railway company, which constituted not only an irrevocable license to enter and occupy a part of the same as a right of way, but obligated the owner, so soon as the road was finally located and built, to convey to the company the right of way of fifty feet on each side of the center of the road, it ivas *held,*that the failure of the company to perform conditions subsequent contained in the *523agreement, such as fencing, etc., furnished no ground for the revocation of the license under which the company entered and constructed its road, as complete indemnity in damages were recoverable therefor in an action at law, and therefore the owner could not recover possession of the right of way in ejectment for breach of such conditions.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of McLean county ■ the Hon. Thomas F. Tipton, Judge, presiding.

Messrs. Williams, Burr & Capen, for the appellant.

Mr. C. W. Fairbanks, for the appellee.

Mr. Justice Scott

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This action was brought in ejectment to recover a strip of land 100 feet in width, being the right of way on which defendant’s road-bed is constructed through a tract of land owned by plaintiff. Ho question is made that plaintiff was the original owner of the land.

Prior to the construction of the railroad, he entered into a written contract with the “Danville, Urbana, Bloomington and Pekin Railroad Company,” a corporation created under the laws of this State, and which has since been consolidated with the Eastern Division, under the name of the defendant company, by which he agreed, in consideration the railroad company would make and maintain a fence on each side of its road and give a crossing, in case it should locate its road across his land, the company might, “at any time, enter upon and use said land for the purpose of locating, building, operating and maintaining said railroad.”

Under that agreement the company did enter upon the land, constructed its road, and has operated it since 1870. It constituted not only an irrevocable license to enter and occupy the right of way for its road-bed, but the contract obligated plaintiff so soon as the road was finally located and built upon his land, to convey to the company the title to the right of way, not exceeding fifty feet on each side of the center stake of the survey of the road.

*524It will be observed the conditions contained in the agreement, which it is insisted have not been complied with, are all conditions subsequent. If broken, complete indemnity may be obtained in damages, recoverable in an action at law. The fact the company may not have kept all its covenants and undertakings contained in the agreement with plaintiff, constitutes no ground for the revocation of the license under which the company entered and constructed its road.

The court found correctly, and its judgment must be affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*
CS 314937-Y 03/16/2020

www.cdc.gov/COVID19

በኮሮና ቫይረስ በሽታ 2019 (COVID-19)

ከታመሙ ምን ማድረግ እንዳለብዎ

በ COVID-19 ከታመሙ ወይም COVID-19 እንዲከሰት በሚያደርገው ቫይረስ ተበክለው እንደሆነየሚጠረጥሩ ከሆነ በሽታው በእርሶ ቤት እና

ሰፈር ውስጥ ባሉ ሰዎች ላይ እንዳይዛመት የሚከተሉትን እርምጃዎች በመውሰድ ይከላከሉ።

የጤና አገልገሎት ለማግኘት ካሆን በቀር ከቤት አይውጡ

ከቤትዎ ውጭ ያለ እንቅስቃሴን፣ የጤና እንክብካቤ ከማግኘት ውጪ ይገድቡ። ወደ

ስራ፣ ትምህርት ቤት ወይም ህዝብ የሚሰበሰብባቸው ቦታዎች አይሂዱ። የህዝብ

ትራፖርት፣ ትራስፖርት መጋራት ወይም ታክሲዎችን አይጠቀሙ።

ቤትዎ ውስጥ ካሉ ከሌሎች ሰወች እና እንስሳት ራስዎን ይለዩ

ሰዎች፡ በሚቻለው መጠን፣ በአንድ ክፍል ወስጥ መቆየት እና ከሌሎች እቤት ውስጥ

ካሉ ሰዎች ራስዎን መለየት አለብዎ። በተጨማሪም፣ መጠቀም ያለብዎ ባኞ ቤትም

ለብቻዎ ነው።

እንስሳት በታመሙበት ሰአት ምንም አይነት የቤት እንስሳትን ወይም እንስሳትን

አይንከባከቡ። COVID-19 እና እንስሳትን ለተጨማሪ መረጃ ይመልከቱ።

ወደ ሀኪምዎ ከመሄድዎ በፊት ቀድመው ይደውሉ

የጤና ምርመራ ቀጠሮ ያለዎ ከሆነ፣ ለአገልግሎት ሰጪው ይደውሉ አና COVID-19 

እንዳለብዎ ወይም እንዳለብዎ እንደሚጠረጥሩ ይንገሩ። ይህም የጤና አገልግሎት

ሰጪው ሌሎች ሰዎች እንዳይበከሉ ወይም እንዳይጋለጡ ለማድረግ የሚያስፈልጉ

እርምጃዎችን ይወስዳል።

የፊት ጭምብል ያድርጉ

በሌሎች ሰዎች ዙሪያ ሲሆኑ የፊት ጭምብል ማድረግ አለብዎ (ምሳሌ መኪና ወይም

ክፍል መጋራት) ወይም የቤት እንስሳት ጋር ሲሆኑ እና የጤና አገልግሎት ሰጨ

ጋር ሲሄዱ ነው። የፊት ጭምብል ማድረግ የማይችሉ ከሆነ (ለምሳሌ፣ ለመተንፈስ

የሚያስቸግር ከሆነ) ከእርሶ ጋር የሚኖሩ ሰዎች እርሶ ባሉበት ክፍል ውስጥ መኖር

የለባቸውም ወይም እነርሱ የፊት ጨምብል ማድረግ አለባቸው ይህም እርሶ ክፍል

ውስጥ ሲገቡ ነው።

ሳልዎን እና ማስነጠስዎን ይሸፍኑ

ሲያስሉ ወይም ሲያስነጥሱ አፍ እና አፍንጫዎን በሶፍት ይሸፍኑ። የተጠቀሙበትነ

ሶፍት ውስጡ ላስቲክ ባለው ቆሻሻ መጣያ ውስጥ ያድርጉ እና ወዲያወኑ በሳሙና

እና ውሀ እጅዎን ቢያንሰ ለ 20 ሰከንድ ይታጠቡ ወይም አልኮል ባለው የእጅ ማስጃ

ፈሳሽ ይህም ቢያንስ ከ 60-95% አልኮል ባለው ፈሳሽ ሁሉንም እጅዎ ላይ ያለውን

ክፍል እስከሚደርቅ ድረስ ይታጠቡ። እጅ እንደቆሸሸ የሚያስቡ ከሆነ ውሀ አና ሳሙና

ይመረጣል።

የቤት ውስጥ እቃዎችን አይጋሩ

ድስቶችን፣ የመጠጫ ብርጭቆዎችን፣ ኩባያዎቸን፣ የመመገቢያ እቃዎቸን፣ ፎጣዎች

ወይም የአልጋ ልብሶችን ከሌሎች እቤት ውስጥ ካሉ ሰዎች ወይም እንስሳት ጋር

መጋራት የለብዎትም። እነዚህን እቃዎች ከተጠቀሙ በኋላ፣ በሳሙና እና ውሀ በደንብ

መታጠብ አለባቸው።

እጅዎን በተደጋጋሚ ይታጠቡ

ቢያንስ ለ 20 ሰከንድ እጅዎን በውሀ እና ሳሙና ይታጠቡ። ውሀ እና ሳሙና የሌለ

ከሆነ፣ እጅዎን አልኮን ባለው የእጅ ጽዳት ፈሳሽ ማለትም ቢያንስ 60% አልኮል በሆነ

ማጽጃ ሁሉንም እጅዎን እስከሚደርቅ ድረስ እርስ በርስ እያሻሹ ያድርቁ። እጆች

እንደቆሸሹ የሚታይ ከሆነ ሳሙና አና ውሀ መጠቀም የሚመረጥ ነው። አይንዎን፣

አፍንጫዎን አና አፍዎን ባልታጠበ እጅ አይንኩ።

“እጅ የሚበዛባቸወን” ቦታዎቸን በየቀኑ ያጽዱ

ብዙ ንክኪ የሚበዛባቸው ቦታዎች እንደ ካውነተሮች፣ ጠረጴዛዎች፣ የበር እጀታዎች፣

የባኞቤት መገልገያዎች፣ ሽንት ቤቶች፣ ስልኮች፣ የቁልፍ ሰሌዳዎች፣ ታብሌቶች እና

የአልጋ ጠረጴዛዎች ናቸው። ደግሞ ደም፣ ሰገራ ወይም የሰውነት ፈሳሽ ሊኖራቸው

የሚችሉ ቦታዎችን ያጽዱ። የቤት ማጽጃ ስፕሬይ ወይም ዋይፕ እንደ ምርቱ መመሪያ

መሰረት ተጠቀሙ። መመሪያዎች የጽዳት ምርቱን ከመጠቀምዎ በፊት ደህንቱን

በጠበቀ እና በሚገባ በጥንቃቄ እንዴት መጠቀም እንዳለብዎ ይገልጻሉ፣ እነዚህም

ጓንት ማድረግ እና ምርቱን ሲጠቀሙ በቂ አየር በቦታዉ መኖሩን ማረጋገጥ ናቸው።

ያለቦትን ምልክቶች ይከታተሉ

ህመምዎ እየባሰ ከሄደ አስፈላጊውን የጤና ክትትል ይውሰዱ (ለምሳሌ፣ መተንፈስ

የሚቸገሩ ከሆነ። እንክብካቤ ከመጀመርዎበፊትየጤና እንክብካቤ ሰጪዎ ጋር

በመደወል COVID-19 እንዳለብዎ ወይም እየተመረመሩ እንደሆነ ይንገሩ። ምርመራ

ጣቢያው ውስጥ ከመግባትዎ በፊት የፊት ማስክ ያድርጉ። እነዚህ እርምጃዎች በጤና

እንክብካቤው ቢሮ ውስጥ ያሉ ወይም በመጠበቅ ውስጥ ያሉ ሰዎች እንዳይጠቁ

ወይም እንዳይጋለጡ ይረዳል።

የጤና እንክብካቤ ሰጪዎ የአካባቢ ወይም የስቴት ጤና ዲፓርትመንቱ ጋር

እንዲደውል ይጠይቁ። ጥብቅ ክትትል እየተደረጋበቸው ወይም በራስ ክትትል ውስጥ

ያሉ ሰዎች በአካባቢው የቴና ዲፓርትመንት ወይም በጤና ባለሙያዎች የሚሰጡትን

መመሪያዎች በተገቢው መንገድ መተል አለባቸው።

የህክምና ድንገተኛ አደጋ ውስጥ ከሆኑና 911 መደወል ካስፈለገዎ፣ ጥሪዎን

ላስተናገደው ሰው COVID-19 ምርመራ ላይ እንደሆኑ ይግለጹላቸው። የሚቻል

ከሆነ፣ የድንገተኛ አደጋ አገልግሎት ሰጪዎች ከመምጣታቸው በፊት የፊት ማስክ

አድርገው ይጠብቋቸው።

በቤት ውስጥ ተለይቶ መቆየትን ማቋረጥ

የተረጋገጠ COVID-19 ያለባቸው ሰዎች ወደ ሌላ ሰው የሚያስተላልፉበት እድል

ዝቅተኛ እስከሚሆን ድረስ በቤት ውስጥ ተለይተው መቀመጥ አለባቸው። የቤት

ተለይቶ መቀመጥን የማቋረጥ ውሳኔ እንደ እያንዳንዱ ኬዝ ጉዳይ ከጤና እንክብካቤ

ሰጪዎች እና ከስቴት ወይም አካባቢ የጤና ዲፓርትመንቶች ጋር በመወያየት የሚታይ

ይሆናል።
claims relating to the deprivation of constitutional rights that occurred 

prior to the entry of the guilty plea" (internal quotation marks omitted)). 

Having considered Schneider's contentions and concluded 

that he is not entitled to relief, we 

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED. 

J. 

Hardesty 

cc: Hon. Nancy L. Porter, District Judge 

Elko County Public Defender 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Elko County District Attorney 

Elko County Clerk 

2
HomeLatest FilingsPrevious Page

    - SEC Home  »
    - Search the Next-Generation EDGAR System  »
    - Company Search  »
    - Current Page

235 WEST GALENA STREETMILWAUKEE WI 53212         

235 WEST GALENA STREETMILWAUKEE WI 53212         414-299-2270

First Trust Real Assets Fund CIK#: 0001898303 (see all company filings)
State location: WI | State of Inc.: **DE** | Fiscal Year End: 0331Get **insider transactions** for this **issuer**.File Number: **812-15381**

||
||
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-22-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-22-1997
<CASH>                                        40981000
<SECURITIES>                                 137096000
<RECEIVABLES>                                 53452000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  291644000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             557876000
<PP&E>                                      1503725000
<DEPRECIATION>                               688238000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              1503525000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        359117000
<BONDS>                                      183992000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                      62404000
<OTHER-SE>                                   811249000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                1503525000
<SALES>                                     3880959000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            3880959000
<CGS>                                       2734530000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               3740504000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             6779000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              140455000
<INCOME-TAX>                                  54951000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           85504000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  85504000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.41
        


</TABLE>
#### § 367.4571 Account 457.1, Direct costs charged to associate companies.

This account must include those direct costs that can be identified through a cost allocation system as being applicable to services performed for associate companies. This account must not include any compensation for use of equity capital or inter-company interest on indebtedness.
### §253. Apportionment of income among counties

The income of each county receiving moneys from the Olympic National Forest, under section 500 of this title, shall be proportional to the total area of each county in the Olympic National Forest and the Olympic National Park combined.

(June 29, 1938, ch. 812, §3, 52 Stat. 1242.)
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T21:19:49-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 14 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

1 Resolved by the Senate (the House of Representatives 

2 concurring), 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF EMANCIPATION HALL FOR EVENT TO 

4 CELEBRATE BIRTHDAY OF KING KAMEHA5 MEHA I. 

6 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—Emancipation Hall in the 

7 Capitol Visitor Center is authorized to be used on June 

8 9, 2019, for an event to celebrate the birthday of King 

9 Kamehameha I. 

10 (b) PREPARATIONS.—Physical preparations for the 

11 conduct of the event described in subsection (a) shall be 

12 carried out in accordance with such conditions as may be 

13 prescribed by the Architect of the Capitol. 

Passed the Senate April 11, 2019. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. CON. RES. 14 

CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 

Authorizing the use of Emancipation Hall in the 

the birthday of King Kamehameha I. Capitol Visitor Center for an event to celebrate
§ 32.35 Disqualification. No claim shall be approved if the claimant is— ( a ) In default on any student loan obtained under 20 U.S.C. 1091 (higher education assistance), unless, for good cause shown, the Director grants a waiver; or
( b ) Subject to a denial of federal benefits under 21 U.S.C. 862 (drug traffickers and possessors).
#### § 31.402 Application on file.

Any Federal funds awarded pursuant to an application must be distributed and expended pursuant to and in accordance with the programs contained in the applicant State's current approved application. Any departures therefrom, other than to the extent permitted by current program and fiscal regulations and guidelines, must be submitted for advance approval by the Administrator of OJJDP.