Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 160 / Thursday, August 19, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 51177 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

■ 1. The authority citation for 14 CFR 

part 71 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 

1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation 

Administration Order 7400.9T, Airspace 

Designations and Reporting Points, 

signed August 27, 2009, and effective 

September 15, 2009 is amended as 

follows: 

Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas 

extending upward from 700 feet or more 

above the surface. 

* * * * * 

ASW OK E5 Pauls Valley, OK [Amended] 

Pauls Valley Municipal Airport, OK 

(Lat. 34°42′34′′ N., long. 97°13′24′′ W.) 

Pauls Valley NDB 

(Lat. 34°42′55′′ N., long. 97°13′44′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within a 6.6-mile 

radius of Pauls Valley Municipal Airport and 

within 2.6 miles each side of the 169° bearing 

from the Pauls Valley NDB extending from 

the 6.6-mile radius to 7.6 miles south of the 

airport, and within 4 miles each side of the 

000° bearing from the airport extending from 

the 6.6-mile radius to 11.5 miles north of the 

airport. 

Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on August 6, 

2010. 

Anthony D. Roetzel, 

Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO 

Central Service Center. 

[FR Doc. 2010–20397 Filed 8–18–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2010–0387; Airspace 

Docket No. 10–ANM–1] 

Revocation of Class E Airspace; 

Eastsound, WA 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This action will remove Class 

E surface airspace at Orcas Island 

Airport, Eastsound, WA. Controlled 

airspace already exists in the Eastsound, 

WA area that accommodates the safety 

and management of aircraft operations 

at Orcas Island Airport. 

DATES: Effective Date: 0901 UTC, 

November 18, 2010. The Director of the 

Federal Register approves this 

incorporation by reference action under 

1 CFR part 51, subject to the annual 

revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and 

publication of conforming amendments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Eldon Taylor, Federal Aviation 

Administration, Operations Support 

Group, Western Service Center, 1601 

Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, WA 98057; 

telephone (425) 203–4537. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

History 

On May 28, 2010, the FAA published 

in the Federal Register a notice of 

proposed rulemaking to amend 

controlled airspace at Eastsound, WA 

(75 FR 29963). Interested parties were 

invited to participate in this rulemaking 

effort by submitting written comments 

on the proposal to the FAA. No 

comments were received. 

Class E airspace designations are 

published in paragraph 6002 of FAA 

Order 7400.9T signed August 27, 2009, 

and effective September 15, 2009, which 

is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 

71.1. The Class E airspace designations 

listed in this document will be 

published subsequently in that Order. 

The Rule 

This action amends Title 14 Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 by 

removing Class E surface airspace at 

Orcas Island Airport, Eastsound, WA. 

Controlled airspace extending upward 

from 700 feet above the surface already 

exists, making the Class E surface 

airspace unnecessary. 

The FAA has determined this 

regulation only involves an established 

body of technical regulations for which 

frequent and routine amendments are 

necessary to keep them operationally 

current. Therefore, this regulation: (1) Is 

not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ 

under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not 

a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT 

Regulatory Policies and Procedures 

(44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and 

(3) does not warrant preparation of a 

regulatory evaluation as the anticipated 

impact is so minimal. Since this is a 

routine matter that will only affect air 

traffic procedures and air navigation, it 

is certified this rule, when promulgated, 

will not have a significant economic 

impact on a substantial number of small 

entities under the criteria of the 

Regulatory Flexibility Act. The FAA’s 

authority to issue rules regarding 

aviation safety is found in Title 49 of the 

U.S. Code. Subtitle 1, Section 106 

discusses the authority of the FAA 

Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation 

Programs, describes in more detail the 

scope of the agency’s authority. This 

rulemaking is promulgated under the 

authority described in subtitle VII, part 

A, subpart I, section 40103. Under that 

section, the FAA is charged with 

prescribing regulations to assign the use 

of airspace necessary to ensure the 

safety of aircraft and the efficient use of 

airspace. This regulation is within the 

scope of that authority as it removes 

controlled airspace at Orcas Island 

Airport, Eastsound, WA. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (air). 

Adoption of the Amendment 

■ In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

■ 1. The authority citation for 14 CFR 

part 71 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 

1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal Aviation 

Administration Order 7400.9T, Airspace 

Designations and Reporting Points, 

signed August 27, 2009, and effective 

September 15, 2009 is amended as 

follows: 

Paragraph 6002 Class E airspace designated 

as surface areas. 

* * * * * 

ANM WA E2 Eastsound, WA [Removed] 

Issued in Seattle, Washington, on August 9, 

2010. 

Lori Andriesen, 

Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, 

Western Service Center. 

[FR Doc. 2010–20399 Filed 8–18–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY 

COMMISSION 

16 CFR Part 1215 

Safety Standard for Infant Bath Seats; 

Correction 

AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety 

Commission. 

ACTION: Final rule; correction. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES
51178 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 160 / Thursday, August 19, 2010 / Rules and Regulations 

SUMMARY: The United States Consumer 

Product Safety Commission (‘‘CPSC’’ or 

‘‘Commission’’) is correcting a final rule 

that appeared in the Federal Register of 

June 4, 2010 (75 FR 31691). The 

document established a standard for 

infant bath seats by incorporating by 

reference ASTM F 1967–08a with 

certain changes. The Commission is 

correcting an error that left in an 

introductory phrase in one provision 

concerning the stability requirements 

that should have been omitted from the 

standard. 

DATES: Effective on December 6, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Carolyn Manley, Office of Compliance 

and Field Operations, Consumer 

Product Safety Commission, 4330 East 

West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814; 

telephone (301) 504–7607; 

cmanley@cpsc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission published in the Federal 

Register of June 4, 2010 (75 FR 31691) 

a final rule establishing a standard for 

infant bath seats by incorporating by 

reference ASTM F 1967–08. An 

introductory phrase in the stability 

performance requirements in the ASTM 

standard should have been removed to 

make the provision consistent with the 

Commission’s definition of ‘‘bath seat.’’ 

The preamble to the final rule stated: 

‘‘the final rule removes the beginning 

phrase in section 6.1: ‘for bath seats 

which provide support for an 

occupant’s back and support for the 

sides or front of the occupant or both.’ 

Given the definition of bath seat in the 

final rule, this phrase is redundant, and 

the final rule, therefore eliminates it.’’ 75 

FR 31696. However, the text of the 

standard did not remove the 

introductory phrase. This notice 

corrects that error by restating section 

6.1 of ASTM F 1967–08a without the 

introductory phrase, and adding at the 

end the language the Commission is 

adding to this section of the ASTM 

standard. 

■ In FR Doc. 2010–13073 appearing on 

page 31691 in the Federal Register of 

Friday, June 4, 2010, the following 

correction is made: 

§ 1215.2 [Corrected] 

■ 1. On page 31698, in the second 

column, in § 1215.2 Requirements for 

infant bath seats, paragraph (b)(2) is 

corrected to read, ‘‘In addition to section 

6.1 of ASTM F 1967–08a, comply with 

the following: 

(i) 6.1 Stability—* * * If any time 

during the application of force, the seat 

is no longer in the initial ‘intended use 

position’ and is tilted at an angle of 12 

degrees or more from its initial starting 

position, it shall be considered a 

failure.’’ 

Should be corrected to read, ‘‘Instead 

of section 6.1 of ASTM F 1967–08a, 

comply with the following: 

(i) 6.1 Stability—The geometry and 

construction of the product shall not 

allow for any parts of the product to 

become separated from it, shall not 

sustain permanent damage, and shall 

not allow the product to tip over after 

being tested in accordance with 7.4. In 

addition, if any attachment point 

disengages from (is no longer in contact 

with) the test platform and then fails to 

return to its manufacturer’s intended 

use position after being tested in 

accordance with 7.4, it fails the 

requirement. This test shall be 

conducted after the Mechanisms 

Durability test in 7.1.3. If any time 

during the application of force, the seat 

is no longer in the initial ‘intended use 

position’ and is tilted at an angle of 12 

degrees or more from its initial starting 

position, it shall be considered a 

failure.’’ 

Dated: August 13, 2010. 

Todd Stevenson, 

Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety 

Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–20595 Filed 8–18–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6355–01–P 

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY 

COMMISSION 

16 CFR Part 1216 

Safety Standard for Infant Walkers; 

Correction 

AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety 

Commission. 

ACTION: Final rule; correction. 

SUMMARY: The United States Consumer 

Product Safety Commission (‘‘CPSC’’ or 

‘‘Commission’’) is correcting a final rule 

that appeared in the Federal Register of 

June 21, 2010 (75 FR 35266). The 

document established a standard for 

infant walkers. The Commission is 

correcting a typographical error in one 

provision and correcting another 

provision concerning warning 

statements on walkers with parking 

brakes. 

DATES: Effective on December 21, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Carolyn Manley, Office of Compliance 

and Field Operations, Consumer 

Product Safety Commission, 4330 East 

West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814; 

telephone (301) 504–7607; 

cmanley@cpsc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the 

Federal Register of June 21, 2010 (75 FR 

35266), the Commission published a 

final rule establishing a standard for 

infant walkers pursuant to section 

104(b) of the Consumer Product Safety 

Improvement Act of 2008. The final rule 

contained two errors which the 

Commission is now correcting. 

The first correction pertains to 

§ 1216.2(b)(11)(i) regarding the position 

of the walker’s wheels during testing. 

The first sentence in § 1216.2(b)(11)(i) 

refers to ‘‘Plane B,’’ but the last sentence 

in the same section refers, incorrectly, to 

‘‘Plane A’’ (see 75 FR at 35275 (col. 3) 

through 35276 (col. 2)). The 

Commission is correcting the rule to 

refer to ‘‘Plane B’’ in the last sentence. 

Another provision, at 

§ 1216.2(b)(21)(i), concerning a warning 

statement for walkers with parking 

brakes omitted a phrase indicating that 

the warning is only required for walkers 

that have parking brakes. The preamble 

to the final rule correctly noted that the 

warning is to apply if a walker has a 

parking brake (see 75 FR at 35271). This 

document makes the necessary 

corrections. 

■ In FR Doc. 2010–14323 appearing on 

page 35266 in the Federal Register of 

Monday, June 21, 2010, the following 

correction is made: 

§ 1216.2 [Corrected] 

■ 1. On page 35276, in the second 

column, in § 1216.2 Requirements for 

infant walkers, in paragraph (b)(11)(i), 

‘‘Position the swivel wheels in such a 

way that the walker moves sideward in 

a straight line parallel to Plane A.’’ is 

corrected to read ‘‘Position the swivel 

wheels in such a way that the walker 

moves sideward in a straight line 

parallel to Plane B.’’ 

■ 2. On page 35278, in the third column, 

in § 1216.2 Requirements for infant 

walkers, in paragraph (b)(21)(i), ‘‘A 

warning statement shall address the 

following’’ is corrected to read ‘‘If the 

walker is equipped with a parking 

brake, a warning statement shall address 

the following.’’ 

Dated: August 13, 2010. 

Todd Stevenson, 

Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety 

Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–20593 Filed 8–18–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6355–01–P 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with RULES