alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Yuhua Yang, the Chief Financial Officer of TEC
TECHNOLOGY, INC. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

1. The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2010 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this
statement this 15th day of November, 2010.

/s/ Yuhua
YangYuhua Yang Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to TEC Technology, Inc. and will be retained by TEC
Technology, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.

---
### §228b. Composition of park

#### (a) Additional lands, waters, and interests therein

In order to add to the Grand Canyon National Park certain prime portions of the canyon area possessing unique natural, scientific, and scenic values, the Grand Canyon National Park shall comprise, subject to any valid existing rights under the Navajo Boundary Act of 1934, all those lands, waters, and interests therein, constituting approximately one million two hundred thousand acres, located within the boundaries as depicted on the drawing entitled "Boundary Map, Grand Canyon National Park," numbered 113–20, 021 B and dated December 1974, a copy of which shall be on file and available for public inspection in the offices of the National Park Service, Department of the Interior.

#### (b) Abolition of Grand Canyon and Marble Canyon National Monuments

For purposes of sections 228a to 228j of this title, the Grand Canyon National Monument and the Marble Canyon National Monument are abolished.

#### (c) Study and report to Congress of suitability of lands included within enlarged boundaries; submission date

The Secretary of the Interior shall study the lands within the former boundaries of the Grand Canyon National Monument commonly known as the Tuckup Point, Slide Mountain, and Jensen Tank areas to determine whether any portion of these lands might be unsuitable for park purposes and whether in his judgment the public interest might be better served if they were deleted from the Grand Canyon National Park. The Secretary shall report his findings and recommendations to the Congress no later than one year from January 3, 1975.

(Pub. L. 93–620, §3, Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 2090.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Navajo Boundary Act of 1934, referred to in subsec. (a), is act June 14, 1934, ch. 521, 48 Stat. 960, which was not classified to the Code.
Exhibit No. 23.1







Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
   Gerber Scientific, Inc.:
We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements No. 2-93695, No. 33-58668, No. 333-26177, No. 333-42879, No. 333-81447, No. 333-83463, No. 333-39754, and No. 333-116991 on Form S-8 of Gerber Scientific, Inc. of our reports dated July 12, 2005, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Gerber Scientific, Inc. and subsidiaries as of April 30, 2005 and 2004 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended April 30, 2005, Management's Assessment of the Effectiveness of Internal Control over Financial Reporting as of April 30, 2005 and Effectiveness of Internal Control over Financial Reporting as of April 30, 2005, which reports appear in the April 30, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K of Gerber Scientific, Inc.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
July 12, 2005
### SUBCHAPTER LXXXIX—BIG SOUTH FORK NATIONAL RIVER AND RECREATION AREA
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000835663
<NAME> THE GLENMEDE FUND
<SERIES NUMBER> 10
[NAME] EMERGING MARKETS PORTFOLIO
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       12 MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR END>                  31-Oct-99
<PERIOD-END>                       31-Oct-99
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                  65,599,936
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                 72,246,098
<RECEIVABLES>                             596,217
<ASSETS-OTHER>                          5,354,750
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         78,197,065
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                  334,073
<OTHER-ITEMS LIABILITIES>               4,688,694
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                     5,022,767
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>               92,769,748
<SHARES-COMMON-CURRENT>                 8,823,513
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                   9,504,634
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                (687,245)
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>               (25,581,792)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                        0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                6,673,587
<NET-ASSETS>                           73,174,298
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                       1,051,315
<INTEREST-INCOME>                          28,204
<OTHER-INCOME>                             28,904
<EXPENSES-NET>                          1,218,012
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                  (109,589)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                6,487,322
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>              16,585,194
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                  22,962,927
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                       0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                        0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                           0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                 1,006,846
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>             1,687,967
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                             0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                 17,385,695
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                         0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>             (32,866,615)
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                         0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                      0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                     872,016
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                         1,218,012
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                   69,571,566
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                        5.87
<PER-SHARE-NII>                             (0.01)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                      2.43
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                         0.00
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                    0.00
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                         0.00
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                           8.29
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                              1.75%



</TABLE>
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72 -70

34 36 38 40 42 

### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 06/18 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 18 Jun 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.46 N 76.63 WMeters AGL
#### OTTO VAN DER BRUG and ALICE VAN DER BRUG, Plaintiffs v. R. PARAMAGURU, FAMILY HEALTH PROGRAM, INC., d/b/a FHP-CATHOLIC MEDICAL CENTER, GUAM MEMORIAL HOSPITAL and DOES I through V, Defendants

Civil No. 518-76

Superior Court of Guam

September 1, 1976

BENSON, *Judge*

ORDER

The Defendants R. Paramaguru and Family Health Program Inc., d/b/a FHP-Catholic Medical Center, Guam Memorial Hospital and Does I through V, moved for an order dismissing the complaint pursuant to Rule 12 on the ground that the Plaintiffs had not fulfilled the prerequisite screening and arbitration procedures of Section 9990.9. After oral argument on August 6, 1976, the matter was submitted for decision.

*338Public Law 13-115 deprives the parties of their right to trial by jury guaranteed by the Organic Act.

1. Section 9990.8(b) permits the “plaintiff” to “appeal the panel’s findings in the Superior Court of Guam.” The other party has no corresponding right under the act to appeal an adverse decision of the panel on the issue of liability. *Wright v. Central Dupage Hospital Association*(S.Ct. Ill. 1976), 347 N.E.2d 736.

The word “appeal” in this connection means a trial *de novo. In re Appropriation for Highway Purposes,*148 N.E.2d 242, 245, 246, 104 Ohio App. 243. This interpretation is most favorable to the Defendants’ position.

2. The Act provides that only certain review is available after the panel makes an award. It can be confirmed, corrected, or vacated. (Section 9990.10(c)). There is no provision for trial by jury. *Smyth Sales v. Petroleum Heat & Power Co.,*141 F.2d 41 (3rd Cir. 1944); *Wright v. Central Dupage Hospital Association,*supra.

The confirmed award, in fact, becomes a judgment. (Section 9990.10 (o)). Should a dissatisfied party commence a civil action, his opponent would undoubtedly assert res judicata as an affirmative defense.

The language of Section 9990.13 (a) does not preserve the right to trial by jury. The expressed intent runs counter to the provisions of the Act. No authority is granted to anyone by the Act to establish procedures by which the right may be exercised.

3. The act is fatal for the failure to provide for jury trial in the two instances cited above. The court must note, but without deciding, that there is a serious question of separation of powers because the Act purported to establish a panel of non-judicial individuals (except one) to pass on issues which traditionally have been reserved exclusively to the judiciary.

*339IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion be, and it hereby is, denied.
Exhibit
31.2








**Certification
Pursuant To Section 302 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of
2002**





I, **George
Sharp** ,
Principal Financial Officer of Sharp Holding Corporation, certify
that:





1.  I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of **Sharp
Holding Corporation** ;





2.  Based on
my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.  Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of Sharp Holding Corporation as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;





4.  Sharp
Holding Corporation's other certifying officer and I:





(a) Are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for Sharp Holding
Corporation and have:





(b)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to Sharp Holding Corporation, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of Sharp Holding Corporation's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in Sharp Holding Corporation's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during Sharp Holding
Corporation's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, Sharp Holding Corporation's internal
control over financial reporting; and





5.  Sharp
Holding Corporation's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
Sharp Holding Corporation's auditors and the audit committee of Sharp Holding
Corporation's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):





(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect Sharp Holding Corporation's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and





(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in Sharp Holding Corporation's internal control over
financial reporting.





Date: **May
20, 2005**





**/s/
George Sharp**


**George
Sharp**


**Principal
Financial Officer of Sharp Holding Corporation**
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Service Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Pamela J. Montpelier, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and
Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K (Item 601(b)(32)) promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Securities Act) and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act). In accordance with clause (ii) of
Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.



/s/ PAMELA J.
MONTPELIER

|Pamela | J. Montpelier
|------ | -------------

|Chief | Executive Officer
|----- | -----------------



November 13, 2003
### §77z–4. Data standards

#### (a) Requirement

The Commission shall, by rule, adopt data standards for all registration statements, and for all prospectuses included in registration statements, required to be filed with the Commission under this subchapter, except that the Commission may exempt exhibits, signatures, and certifications from those data standards.

#### (b) Consistency

The data standards required under subsection (a) shall incorporate, and ensure compatibility with (to the extent feasible), all applicable data standards established in the rules promulgated under section 5334 of title 12, including, to the extent practicable, by having the characteristics described in clauses (i) through (vi) of subsection (c)(1)(B) of such section 5334.

(May 27, 1933, ch. 38, title I, §29, as added Pub. L. 117–263, div. E, title LVIII, §5821(e), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3426.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 5821(e) of Pub. L. 117–263 directed that this section be added at the end of title I of the Securities Act of 1933, which is classified to this subchapter. For purposes of codification, however, this section was added after section 77z–3 of this title and before Schedules A and B set out at section 77aa of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Rule of Construction—No New Disclosure Requirements

Enactment of section not to be construed to require certain additional information to be collected or disclosed, see section 5826 of Pub. L. 117–263, set out as a note under section 77g of this title.
Served: November 17 , 2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, DC

------------------------------------------------------------ 

### EXPRESSJET AIRLINES

, INC

.

-----------------------------------------------------------



### NOTICE OF REGISTRATION OF TRADE NAME S

On November 8, 2011

, ExpressJet Airlines, Inc. (“ExpressJet”)

, a U.S

. certificated air carrier, 1 request ed

that the Department regist e r the trade name s “ ASA ” and “Atlantic Southeast” for use in certain air

transportation operations

. ExpressJet also uses the trade names “Continental Express” and “United

Express.”

Part 215 (14 CFR Part 215) of the Department’s regulations provides that any air carrier wishin g to use

an alternative trade name must first register that name with the Department. The rule further states that

the Department may register such name after the air carrier gives notification to similarly named air

carriers of the proposed use of the na me. In this case, ExpressJet states that it and Atlantic Southeast a re

in the process of merging to create a single air carrier. ExpressJet states that Atlantic Southeast conse nts

to the use of its trade name, and that while the two air carriers will maintain separate economic

authorities until they merge, the two airlines desire to have a degree of flexibility as they fully integrate

their operations. Further, ExpressJet notes the two air carriers will make all required disclosures of the

identities and trade names in accordance with the provisions of Part 257 of the Department’s regulations

(14 CFR Part 257).

Since ExpressJet has complied with the requirements of Part 215, we acknowledge the registration of the

trade names “ASA” and “Atlantic Southeast” for immediate use in its operations.

Dated at Washington, D.C. , November 17 , 2011.

TODD M. HOMAN

Director

Office of Aviation Analysis

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at:

http:// www.regulations.gov

1 See Order 2002

- 4

- 8. ExpressJet also holds a number of designations under the U.S.

- Mexico Air Transport

Agreement.Attachment A

SE RVICE LIST FOR EXPRESSJET AIRLINES, INC.

MR GERALD MURPHY

COUNSEL FOR ASA AIRLINES INC

AND EXPRESSJET AIRLINES INC

CROWELL AND MORING LLP

1001 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE NW

WASHINGTON DC 20 004 MR WILLIAM J WEBER

CERTIFICATION MANAGE R

FAA AFS

- 900

45005 AVIATION DRIVE SUITE 131

DULLES VA 20166

OFFICE OF AIRLINE INFORMATION

DOT/RSPA/BTS E

- 36

1200 NEW JERSEY AVE SE

WASHINGTON DC 20590 MR PETER LYNCH

ASST CHIEF COUNSEL FOR E NFORCEMENT

FAA / AGC

- 300

800 INDEPENDENCE AVE SW

WASHINGTON DC 20591
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Document Search 
-  Compliance Guide For Size Standards 

# Compliance guide for size standards

## About this document and download

When you calculate the size of your business to determine if you are a small business, you must include the annual receipts and the employees of your affiliates. Affiliation is determined by the ability to control. When the ability to control exists, even if it is not exercised, affiliation exists.

This guide can help you determine affiliation.

 

 

  Download  .pdf

**Effective**

**Related Programs**    Related programs:
### §8547. Report on contract positions at National Weather Service

#### (a) Report required

Not later than 180 days after April 18, 2017, the Under Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the use of contractors at the National Weather Service for the most recently completed fiscal year.

#### (b) Contents

The report required by subsection (a) shall include, with respect to the most recently completed fiscal year, the following:

(1) The total number of full-time equivalent employees at the National Weather Service, disaggregated by each equivalent level of the General Schedule.

(2) The total number of full-time equivalent contractors at the National Weather Service, disaggregated by each equivalent level of the General Schedule that most closely approximates their duties.

(3) The total number of vacant positions at the National Weather Service on the day before April 18, 2017, disaggregated by each equivalent level of the General Schedule.

(4) The five most common positions filled by full-time equivalent contractors at the National Weather Service and the equivalent level of the General Schedule that most closely approximates the duties of such positions.

(5) Of the positions identified under paragraph (4), the percentage of full-time equivalent contractors in those positions that have held a prior position at the National Weather Service or another entity in National 1 Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

(6) The average full-time equivalent salary for Federal employees at the National Weather Service for each equivalent level of the General Schedule.

(7) The average salary for full-time equivalent contractors performing at each equivalent level of the General Schedule at the National Weather Service.

(8) A description of any actions taken by the Under Secretary to respond to the issues raised by the Inspector General of the Department of Commerce regarding the hiring of former National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration employees as contractors at the National Weather Service such as the issues raised in the Investigative Report dated June 2, 2015 (OIG–12–0447).

#### (c) Annual publication

For each fiscal year after the fiscal year covered by the report required by subsection (a), the Under Secretary shall, not later than 180 days after the completion of the fiscal year, publish on a publicly accessible Internet website the information described in paragraphs (1) through (8) of subsection (b) for such fiscal year.

(Pub. L. 115–25, title IV, §410, Apr. 18, 2017, 131 Stat. 112.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The General Schedule, referred to in subsec. (b), is set out under section 5332 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

1 So in original. Probably should be preceded by "the".
LIFE IS BETTER WITH

www.cdc.gov/handwashing

This material was developed by CDC. The Life is Better with Clean Hands Campaign is made possible by a partnership 

between the CDC Foundation, GOJO, and Staples. HHS/CDC does not endorse commercial products, services, or companies. 

CS311042-A

LEAD

BY EXAMPLE

Wash your hands and 

teach kids to scrub 

hands for at least 

20 SECONDS.