alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 36.604 Procedure following preliminary determination of equivalency. ( a ) If the Assistant Attorney General makes a preliminary determination of equivalency under § 36.603, he or she shall inform the submitting official, in writing, of that preliminary determination. The Assistant Attorney General also shall— ( 1 ) Publish a notice in the Federal Register that advises the public of the preliminary determination of equivalency with respect to the particular code, and invite interested persons and organizations, including individuals with disabilities, during a period of at least 60 days following publication of the notice, to file written comments relevant to whether a final certification of equivalency should be issued;
( 2 ) After considering the information received in response to the notice described in paragraph (a) of this section, and after publishing a separate notice in the Federal Register, hold an informal hearing, in the State or local jurisdiction charged with administration and enforcement of the code, at which interested individuals, including individuals with disabilities, are provided an opportunity to express their views with respect to the preliminary determination of equivalency; and
( b ) The Assistant Attorney General, after consultation with the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board and consideration of the materials and information submitted pursuant to this section, as well as information provided previously by the submitting official, shall issue either a certification of equivalency or a final determination to deny the request for certification. The Assistant Attorney General shall publish notice of the certification of equivalency or denial of certification in the Federal Register.
[Order No. 1513-91, 56 FR 35592, July 26, 1991, redesignated and amended by AG Order No. 3181-2010, 75 FR 56257, Sept. 15, 2010]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 25, 2016

s0518 

# Order

Clerk May 25, 2016

152190

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 152190

COA: 320318

Saginaw CC: 13

- 038965

- FC

JEMARCUS JOVON WATKINS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 9, 2015

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### § 33.52 Civil rights.

The Justice Assistance Act provides that “no person in any state shall on the ground of race, color, religion, national origin, or sex be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under or denied employment in connection with any programs or activity funded in whole or in part with funds made available under this title.” Section 809(c)(1) of the Act. Recipients of funds under the Act are also subject to the provisions of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972; the Age Discrimination Act of 1975; and the Department of Justice Non-Discrimination regulations 28 CFR part 42, subparts C, D, E, and G.
#### § 301.319 Exclusiveness of remedy.

Inmates who are subject to the provisions of these Inmate Accident Compensation regulations are barred from recovery under the Federal Tort Claims Act (28 U.S.C. 2671 *et seq.*). Recovery under the Inmate Accident Compensation procedure was declared by the U.S. Supreme Court to be the exclusive remedy in the case of work-related injury. *U.S.* v. *Demko,* 385 U.S. 149 (1966).

[55 FR 9296, Mar. 12, 1990, as amended at 59 FR 2667, Jan. 18, 1994]
Editorial Note on Part 28
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear at 76 FR 76873, Dec. 9, 2011.

§ 28.19 Content of response by charged party. ( a ) Within 20 days after service of a copy of a petition, the GAO or other charged party shall file a response containing at least the following: ( 1 ) A statement of the position of the charged party on each allegation set forth therein, including admissions, denials or explanations. If the petition contains numbered paragraphs, the responses should reference the paragraph numbers. If the petition does not contain numbered paragraphs, the responses should quote or otherwise clearly identify the specific allegations of the petition.
( 2 ) Any other defenses to the petition.
( 3 ) Designation of, and signature by, the representative authorized to act for the charged party in the matter.
( b ) Failure to raise a claim or defense in the response shall not bar its submission later unless to do so would prejudice the rights of the other parties or unduly delay the proceedings.
[58 FR 61992, Nov. 23, 1993, as amended at 68 FR 69300, Dec. 12, 2003]
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
 AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
 ACTION: Update listing of financial institutions in liquidation.
 SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (Corporation) has been appointed the sole receiver for the following financial institutions effective as of the Date Closed as indicated in the listing. This list (as updated from time to time in the 
                        **Federal Register**
                        ) may be relied upon as “of record” notice that the Corporation has been appointed receiver for purposes of the statement of policy published in the July 2, 1992 issue of the 
                        **Federal Register**
                         (57 FR 29491). For further information concerning the identification of any institutions which have been placed in liquidation, please visit the Corporation Web site at 
                        *http://www.fdic.gov/​bank/​individual/​failed/​banklist.html*
                         or contact the Manager of Receivership Oversight in the appropriate service center. Dated: March 14, 2011. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Pamela Johnson, Regulatory Editing Specialist.
 Institutions in Liquidation
[In alphabetical order]
FDIC Ref. No.
Bank name
City
State
Date closed10349
First National Bank of Davis
Davis
OK
3/11/201110348
Legacy Bank
Milwaukee
WI
3/11/2011


[FR Doc. 2011-6423 Filed 3-17-11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6741-01-P
                ( print page 14971)
# C_2012025EN.01005001.xml

| 28.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 25/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/50

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 December 2011 — HTTS v Council

(Case T-562/10) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation - Freezing of funds - Actions for annulment - Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based - Procedure by default - Application to intervene - No need to adjudicate)

(2012/C 25/96)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: HTTS (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: J. Kienzle and M. Schlingmann, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bishop and Z. Kupčová, Agents)

Re:

Partial annulment of Council Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 of 25 October 2010 on restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 (OJ 2010 L 281, p. 1), in so far as the applicant’s name was included on the list of persons, entities and bodies whose funds and economic resources are to be frozen.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Decides that there is no longer any need to adjudicate on the applications to intervene submitted by the European Commission and the Federal Republic of Germany; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Decides that there is no longer any need to adjudicate on the applications to intervene submitted by the European Commission and the Federal Republic of Germany;

| 2. | Annuls Council Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 of 25 October 2010 on restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 in so far as it concerns HTTS Hanseatic Trade Trust & Shipping GmbH; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Annuls Council Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 of 25 October 2010 on restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 in so far as it concerns HTTS Hanseatic Trade Trust & Shipping GmbH;

| 3. | Maintains the effects of Regulation No 961/2010 in so far as it concerns the applicant for a period of no more than two months from the date of delivery of this judgment; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Maintains the effects of Regulation No 961/2010 in so far as it concerns the applicant for a period of no more than two months from the date of delivery of this judgment;

| 4. | Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by HTTS Hanseatic Trade Trust & Shipping. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by HTTS Hanseatic Trade Trust & Shipping.

---

(1)  OJ C 46, 12.2.2011.

---
§ 115.366 Preservation of ability to protect residents from contact with abusers. ( a ) Neither the agency nor any other governmental entity responsible for collective bargaining on the agency's behalf shall enter into or renew any collective bargaining agreement or other agreement that limits the agency's ability to remove alleged staff sexual abusers from contact with residents pending the outcome of an investigation or of a determination of whether and to what extent discipline is warranted.
( b ) Nothing in this standard shall restrict the entering into or renewal of agreements that govern: ( 1 ) The conduct of the disciplinary process, as long as such agreements are not inconsistent with the provisions of §§ 115.372 and 115.376; or
( 2 ) Whether a no-contact assignment that is imposed pending the outcome of an investigation shall be expunged from or retained in the staff member's personnel file following a determination that the allegation of sexual abuse is not substantiated.
#     Major Depression Episode

Depression is a common and serious mental health condition affecting the lives of many Americans. People with depression may also struggle to access adequate treatment. SAMHSA staff collects and analyzes data on the prevalence of depression, associated factors, treatment use by those affected, and the mental health system. This information helps public health officials better understand, respond to, and prevent depression.

### Categories Related to Major Depression Episode

                      - Alcohol
                      - Tobacco
                      - Alcohol Use Disorder
                      - Any SUD
                      - Adolescents as Population Group
                      - Illegal Drugs
                      - Marijuana
                      - Pain Relievers
                      - Cocaine
                      - Mature Adults as Population Group
                      - People with Alcohol Use or Abuse Problems as Population Group
                      - People with Mental Health Problems as Population Group
                      - Young Adults as Population Group
                      - People with Substance Use or Abuse Problems as Population Group
                      - Older Adults as Population Group

Latest In Major Depression Episode

2019 NSDUH Detailed Tables

Data Table : National Survey on Drug Use and Health - September 11, 2020

2018 NSDUH Detailed Tables

Data Table : National Survey on Drug Use and Health - August 20, 2019

P-value Tables

Data Table : National Survey on Drug Use and Health - January 28, 2021

Behavioral Health Barometer: Region 1, Volume 6

Barometer : National Survey on Drug Use and Health - December 28, 2020

Behavioral Health Barometer: Region 2, Volume 6

Barometer : National Survey on Drug Use and Health - December 28, 2020

View All
# C_2013026EN.01000401.xml

| 26.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 22 November 2012 — E.ON Energie AG v European Commission

(Case C-89/11 P P) (1)

1

(Appeals - Action for annulment of a Commission decision relating to a fine for breach of seal - Burden of proof - Distortion of the evidence - Obligation to state reasons - Amount of the fine - Unlimited jurisdiction - Principle of proportionality)

2013/C 26/06

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellant: E.ON Energie AG (represented by: A. Röhling, F. Dietrich and R. Pfromm, Rechtsanwälte)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: A. Bouquet, V. Bottka and R. Sauer, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 December 2010 — E.ON Energie v Commission (T-141/08) in which the General Court dismissed the action for annulment of Commission Decision C(2008) 377 final of 30 January 2008 relating to a fine pursuant to Article 23(1)(e) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 for breach of seal — Breach of general principles of law, such as the presumption of innocence, the principle of ‘in dubio pro reo’ and of proportionality, and the rules relating the burden and taking of evidence — Breach of the obligation to state reasons

E.ON Energie

Commission

in dubio pro reo

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders E.ON Energie AG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders E.ON Energie AG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 152, 21.5.2011.

1

---
### §2631. Intervention in proceedings

#### (a) Authority to intervene and participate

In order to initiate and participate in the consideration of one or more of the standards established by subchapter II or other concepts which contribute to the achievement of the purposes of this chapter, the Secretary, any affected electric utility, or any electric consumer of an affected electric utility may intervene and participate as a matter of right in any ratemaking proceeding or other appropriate regulatory proceeding relating to rates or rate design which is conducted by a State regulatory authority (with respect to an electric utility for which it has ratemaking authority) or by a nonregulated electric utility.

#### (b) Access to information

Any intervenor or participant in a proceeding described in subsection (a) shall have access to information available to other parties to the proceeding if such information is relevant to the issues to which his intervention or participation in such proceeding relates. Such information may be obtained through reasonable rules relating to discovery of information prescribed by the State regulatory authority (in the case of proceedings concerning electric utilities for which it has ratemaking authority) or by the nonregulated electric utility (in the case of a proceeding conducted by a nonregulated electric utility).

#### (c) Effective date; procedures

Any intervention or participation under this section, in any proceeding commenced before November 9, 1978, but not completed before such date, shall be permitted under this section only to the extent such intervention or participation is timely under otherwise applicable law.

(Pub. L. 95–617, title I, §121, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3128.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (a), was in the original "this title", meaning title I (§101 et seq.) of Pub. L. 95–617, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3120, which enacted subchapters I to IV of this chapter and section 6808 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, and amended sections 6802 to 6807 of Title 42. For complete classification of title I to the Code, see Tables.
### §715m. Cooperation between Secretary of the Interior and Federal and State authorities

The Secretary of the Interior, in carrying out the Act of February 22, 1935, as amended (15 U.S.C., ch. 15A), is authorized to cooperate with Federal and State authorities.

(June 25, 1946, ch. 472, §3, 60 Stat. 307.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Act of February 22, 1935, referred to in text, is act Feb. 22, 1935, ch. 18, 49 Stat. 30, popularly known as the "Hot Oil Act" and also as the "Connally Hot Oil Act", which is classified generally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 715 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as a part of act Feb. 22, 1935, which comprises this chapter.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Delegation of Functions

Delegation of President's authority to Secretary of the Interior, see note set out under section 715j of this title.
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 10.15.1

[LOGO OF VIA]


May 26, 1999


Antonio Tavares
Rua Bandeira Paulista, 716--1st floor
04532-002--S. Paulo
BRASIL


Dear Antonio:

Pursuant to our conversation, I am pleased to offer you the position of Vice
President, Latin America Region with VIA NET.WORKS, Inc. ("VIA") reporting to
me, beginning on May 11, 1999. Your annual salary will be R$215,000 or
R$17,916.67 for each of the 12 months. You will also be eligible for an annual
bonus of up to 60% of your base annualized salary during the calendar year 1999,
and up to 50% of your base annualized salary thereafter. VIA will administer
your payroll through one of its affiliate companies in Brazil.

You have been approved for a stock option grant of 75,000 shares of VIA
NET.WORKS, Inc. Common Stock at the fair market price as established by the
Board of Directors. Options vest over four years, the details of which will be
included in the formal grant. You have also been granted the right to purchase
up to 35,000 shares of Common Stock at the same fair market value within 60 days
of Board approval. Plan and grant documents will be forwarded to you shortly.
Your vacation will be 30 days per year and you will be eligible for personal and
sick leave as set forth in VIA's corporate policies.

In your position with VIA, you may have direct or indirect access to a
substantial amount of confidential material/data, patentable or unpatentable
inventions, trade secrets, technical know-how etc., and you will be required not
to divulge these during or subsequent to your employment with VIA. Accordingly,
you will be requested as a condition of your employment to sign an Employee
Non-Disclosure Agreement.

If the foregoing is acceptable to you, please sign below. We look forward to
having you join us.

Sincerely,

/s/ David M. D'Ottavio

David M. D'Ottavio
President and CEO                     Read, Approved and Accepted


                                      By: /s/ Antonio Alberto Valente Tavares
                                         -------------------------------------
                                         Antonio Alberto Valente Tavares
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 29,
2007 of the Company, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Deborah H. MerrillDeborah H. MerrillVice President, Chief Financial
Officer
and Treasurer
## About Science.gov

Science.gov is an official website of the U.S. government providing ready access to the massive stores of federally funded scientific research results,		without needing to know which agency funded the research. Research results include scientific and technical reports, peer-reviewed scholarly publications,		digital data, software, conference presentations and proceedings, and other scientific and technical information that federal agencies publish resulting		from their research investments.

Originally launched in 2002, Science.gov searches content from across multiple federal agencies that fund scientific research and provides top-level		results from those agencies, where users get the most relevant results for the information they search.  Unlike typical web-based search engines that		crawl and index web content at unknown frequencies, Science.gov uses a search technology that retrieves results in real-time.  This ensures that the		most recent content is available for search and retrieval by Science.gov.

The latest version of Science.gov is in BETA which means that there are many new website features, but also that certain features are being optimized.		Key features include:

- Modernized design for improved user experience
- Updates for website accessibility
- New content about U.S. Government policies and initiatives that enable open science and public access and policies that protect the integrity of federal science and scientific activities

Science.gov is overseen by CENDI, an interagency working group of senior scientific and technical		information managers representing the majority of the federal R&D budget.

If you would like to provide us feedback or have questions while the site is in BETA, please Contact Us.
#### § 706.409 Opportunity for explanation of conflict or appearance of conflict.

When a statement submitted under § 706.401 indicates a conflict or an appearance of conflict, between the interests of an employee and the performance of his services for the Government, the employee concerned shall be given an opportunity to explain the conflict or appearance of conflict before remedial action is initiated.