alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BONTEX,
INC.'S AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR 
ENDED JUNE 30, 1997, AS SET FORTH IN THE COMPANY'S 1997 ANNUAL REPORT TO 
STOCKHOLDERS AND ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS 
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,373
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,292
<ALLOWANCES>                                       119
<INVENTORY>                                      5,276
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,350
<PP&E>                                          22,663
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,631
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,906
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,336
<BONDS>                                          2,761
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              157
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,358
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,906
<SALES>                                         50,333
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                50,417
<CGS>                                           34,241
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   46,324
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    75
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,247
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,846
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,113
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,733
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,733
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.10
        

</TABLE>
### §2009. Termination of program

The provisions of this chapter shall terminate on December 31, 2023.

(Pub. L. 95–192, §10, Nov. 18, 1977, 91 Stat. 1411; Pub. L. 99–198, title XII, §1252(d), Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1517; Pub. L. 110–234, title II, §2804(e), May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1088; Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title II, §2804(e), June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 1816; Pub. L. 115–334, title II, §2402(4), Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4571.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 110–234 and Pub. L. 110–246 made identical amendments to this section. The amendments by Pub. L. 110–234 were repealed by section 4(a) of Pub. L. 110–246.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–334 substituted "2023" for "2018".

2008—Pub. L. 110–246, §2804(e), substituted "2018" for "2008".

1985—Pub. L. 99–198 substituted "2008" for "1985".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2008 Amendment

Amendment of this section and repeal of Pub. L. 110–234 by Pub. L. 110–246 effective May 22, 2008, the date of enactment of Pub. L. 110–234, see section 4 of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as an Effective Date note under section 8701 of Title 7, Agriculture.
§ 115.18 Upgrades to facilities and technologies. ( a ) When designing or acquiring any new facility and in planning any substantial expansion or modification of existing facilities, the agency shall consider the effect of the design, acquisition, expansion, or modification upon the agency's ability to protect inmates from sexual abuse.
( b ) When installing or updating a video monitoring system, electronic surveillance system, or other monitoring technology, the agency shall consider how such technology may enhance the agency's ability to protect inmates from sexual abuse.
#### § 12.70 Partial compliance not deemed compliance.

The fact that a registration statement has been filed shall not necessarily be deemed a full compliance with the act on the part of the registrant; nor shall it preclude prosecution, as provided for in the act, for willful failure to file a registration statement, or for a willfully false statement of a material fact therein, or for the willful omission of a material fact required to be stated therein.
### §111e. Authorization of appropriations

There are hereby authorized to be appropriated such sums, but not more than $193,233 as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of sections 111c to 111e of this title.

(Pub. L. 88–235, §3, Dec. 23, 1963, 77 Stat. 474; Pub. L. 94–578, title I, §101(8), Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2732.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1976—Pub. L. 94–578 substituted "$193,233" for "$125,000".
DECEMBER 1990 CALENDAR

FROM: THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, COUNTY OF MISSOULA,

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. DOUGLAS L. LAVERDURE, Defendant.

NO. 8531

DATED this 6th day of December, 1990.

OnFebruaiy26,1990, the Defendantwas sentenced to CountH, Aggravated Burglary, fifteen (15) years; Count HI, Criminal Mischief, ten (10) years; the sentences are to run concurrent; with 38 days credit for time served.

QnDecember6,1990,the Defendant’s applicationfor review ofthat sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The Defendant was present and was represented by Joylyn Smith, of the Montana Defender Project. The state was not represented.

Before hearingthe application, the Defendant was advisedthatthe Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also to increase it ifsuchis possible. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

After listening to the testimony, Judge Boyd asked the Petitioner

ifhis sister isDebbie Laverdure. The Petitioner responded, “yes”.JudgeBoyd then stated for the record that he tried Debbie Laverdure, and he cannot participate in any decision making in this matter. He recused himself from the case.

Mr. Laverdure was then giventwo choices, (1) Agree to have two judges make a decision in this matter or (2) have the matter continued until the next session ofthe Sentence Review andhave the matter reheard before a three judge panel.

Mr. Laverdure conferred withhis counsel and informed the SentenceReview Board that he would agree to go ahead with a two judge decision.

After careful consideration, it is the unanimous decision of Judge Erickson and Judge McNeil that the sentence shall remain the same as originally imposed.

The reason for the decision is pursuant to Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division.
#### Cook *v.*The State.

Atkinson, J.

1. A complaint in a motion for a new trial, that error was committed in admitting- certain evidence over the objection of the accused, presents no question for decision, unless the grounds of objection urged against the evidence at the time it was offered are set forth. *Field*v. *State,*126 *Ga.*571 (55 S. E. 502).

*348April 15, 1910.

Indictment for murder. Before Judge Fite. Bartow superior court.

January 11, 1910.

*G. H. Aubrey*and *W. C. Henson,*for plaintiff in error.

*John C. Hart, attorney-general,*and *Thomas W. Milner, solicitor-general,*by *George W. Stevens,*contra.

2. The admission of irrelevant testimony will not generally warrant the granting of a new trial, unless it appears that the evidence was calculated to injuriously affect the complaining party; especially is this true when the evidence is not material and not calculated to mislead the jury. *Elliott*v. *State,*132 *Ga.*758 (64 S. E. 1090).

3. Where evidence shows prima facie that declarations made by a person who had been shot and soon thereafter died were dying declarations within the meaning of the law, they are admissible in evidence. *Lowe*v. *State,*132 *Ga.*341 (63 S. E. 1114). See also *Jones*v. *State,*130 *Ga.*274 (60 S. E. 840); *Bird*v. *State,*128 *Ga.*253 (57 S. E. 320).

4. If the law of voluntary manslaughter was involved, it was founded solely upon the statement of the accused; and there being no timely written request to charge upon the subject of manslaughter, there was no error in refusing to do so. *Robinson*v. *State,*114 *Ga.*56 (39 S. E. 862).

5. Where upon the trial of one charged with murder it was the theory of the State that the defendant killed the deceased for the purpose of robbery, and there was evidence to support such theory, it was not erroneous to permit a witness to testify that the deceased “had some money on the Saturday previous to the killing on Monday. . . I think I paid him between ten and fifteen dollars. . . I suppose Jesse Cook saw me pay him, he was standing right there by him,” over the objection of defendant that such testimony was irrelevant.

6. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, and there was no abuse of discretion in refusing to grant a new trial.

*Judyiheni affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
### §2103b. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–79, title VIII, §8002, Feb. 7, 2014, 128 Stat. 913

Section, Pub. L. 95–313, §6, as added Pub. L. 108–148, title III, §302, Dec. 3, 2003, 117 Stat. 1903; amended Pub. L. 110–234, title VII, §7511(c)(35), May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1270; Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title VII, §7511(c)(35), June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 2032, related to the establishment and implementation of watershed forestry assistance programs.

A prior section 2103b, Pub. L. 95–313, §6, as added Pub. L. 101–624, title XII, §1216, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3526, established the Stewardship Incentive Program, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 107–171, title VIII, §8001(a), May 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 468.

A prior section 6 of Pub. L. 95–313 was renumbered section 9 and is classified to section 2105 of this title.
#### § 367.1740 Account 174, Miscellaneous current and accrued assets.

This account must include the book cost of all other current and accrued assets, appropriately designated and supported so as to show the nature of each asset included in the account.
§ 40.19 Withdrawal of certification. ( a ) *Finding of non-compliance.* If the Attorney General finds that a grievance procedure is no longer in substantial compliance with the minimum standards or is no longer otherwise fair and effective, the Attorney General shall withdraw certification, unless the Attorney General concludes that suspension of certification under § 40.18(b) of this part is appropriate.
( b ) *Notification in writing of withdrawal of certification.* The Attorney General shall notify an applicant in writing that certification has been withdrawn and state the reasons for the action.
( c ) *Recertification after withdrawal.* An applicant whose certification has been withdrawn and who wishes to receive recertification shall submit a new application for certification.
[Order No. 957-81, 46 FR 48186, Oct. 1, 1981, as amended by Order No. 1955-95, 60 FR 13903, Mar. 15, 1995]
§ 35.10 Form and style of rate schedules, tariffs and service agreements. ( a ) Every rate schedule, tariff or service agreement offered for filing with the Commission under this part, shall show on a title page, which shall be otherwise blank, ( 1 ) the name of the filing public utility,
( 2 ) the names of other utilities rendering or receiving service under the rate schedule, tariff or service agreement ; and
( 3 ) a brief description of the service to be provided under the rate schedule, tariff or service agreement .
( b ) At the time a public utility files with the Commission and posts under this part to supersede or change the provisions of a rate schedule, tariff, or service agreement previously filed with the Commission under this part, in addition to the other requirements of this part, it must list in the transmittal letter the sheets or sections revised, and file a marked version of the rate schedule, tariff or service agreement sheets or sections showing additions and deletions. New language must be marked by either highlighting, background shading, bold text, or underlined text. Deleted language must be marked by strike-through.
( c ) In any filing to supersede or change the provisions of a rate schedule, tariff, or service agreement previously filed with the Commission under this part, only those revisions appropriately designated and marked under paragraph (b) of this section constitute the filing. Revisions to unmarked portions of the rate schedule, tariff or service agreement are not considered part of the filing nor will any acceptance of the filing by the Commission constitute acceptance of such unmarked changes.
[Order 271, 28 FR 10573, Oct. 2, 1963, as amended by Order 568, 59 FR 40240, Aug. 8, 1994; Order 714, 73 FR 57532, Oct. 3, 2008]
§ 806.18 Approval modifications. ( a ) *General.* A project sponsor shall submit an application for modification of a current approval prior to making a change in the design, operational plans, or use as presented in the application upon which the approval was originally issued, and that will affect the terms and conditions of the current approval.
( b ) *Applications for modification.* A project sponsor may apply for a modification of a current approval by submitting an application for modification to the Commission.
( c ) *Minor modifications.* The following are minor modifications: ( 1 ) Correction of typographical or other errors;
( 2 ) Changes to monitoring or metering conditions;
( 3 ) Addition, amendment or removal of sources of water for consumptive use or project descriptions;
( 4 ) Changes to the authorized water uses;
( 5 ) Changes to conditions setting a schedule for developing, implementing, and/or reporting on monitoring, data collection and analyses;
( 6 ) Changes to the design and minor changes to the location of intakes;
( 7 ) Increases to total system limits that were established based on the projected demand of the project; and
( 8 ) Modifications of extraction well network used for groundwater remediation systems.
( 9 ) Adjustments to a term of an approval to align the approval with a member jurisdiction approval or another docket approval by the Commission.
( 10 ) Changes to the method of consumptive use mitigation to payment of the mitigation fee, providing for discontinuance, use of storage or an adequate conservation release in accordance with a previous Commission determination.
( 11 ) Addition of stormwater as a source of consumptive use, including an increase to the total consumptive use related to the stormwater use.
( 12 ) Extension of the date of commencement of a withdrawal, diversion or consumptive use established under § 806.31(b).
( d ) *Major modifications.* Major modifications are changes not considered to be minor modifications. Major modifications may include, but are not limited to: ( 1 ) Increases in the quantity of water withdrawals, consumptive uses or diversions;
( 2 ) Increases to peak day consumptive water use;
( 3 ) Increases to the instantaneous withdrawal rate or changes from a single withdrawal rate to a varied withdrawal rate;
( 4 ) Changes affecting passby flow requirements; and
( 5 ) Changes that have the potential for adverse impacts to water resources or competing water users.
( e ) *Notice and approval.* ( 1 ) Applications for modifications are subject to the notice requirements of § 806.15.
( 2 ) The Commission or Executive Director may approve, approve with conditions or deny an application for minor modification, or direct that an application for major modification be made.
( 3 ) The Commission may approve, approve with conditions or deny an application for major modification.
[80 FR 76859, Dec. 11, 2015, as amended at 86 FR 52969, Sept. 24, 2021]
MAKE REGULAR CONVERSATIONS 

PART OF THE ROUTINE.

Know the risks of underage drinking and be prepared to talk 

about them.

Establishing yourself as a trustworthy source of information on alcohol will make 

your child more inclined to ask questions and look to you for support and guidance. 

For tips on how—and when—to begin the conversation, visit 

www.underagedrinking.samhsa.gov

#TalkTheyHearYou PEP20-03-01-025
Exhibit


Exhibit 10.2


FIRST AMENDMENT TO
SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED ADVISORY AGREEMENT 




This FIRST AMENDMENT TO SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED ADVISORY AGREEMENT is entered into as of January 18, 2016, among American Finance Trust, Inc. (f/k/a American Realty Capital Trust V, Inc.) (the “Company”), American Finance Operating Partnership, L.P. (f/k/a American Relaty Capital Operating Partnership V, L.P.) (the “Operating Partnership”) and American Finance Advisors, LLC (f/k/a American Realty Capital Advisors V, LLC) (the “Advisor”).


RECITALS


WHEREAS, the Company, the Operating Partnership and the Advisor entered into that certain Second Amended and Restated Advisory Agreement, dated as of April 29, 2015 (as amended, the “Advisory Agreement”); and


WHEREAS, the Company, the Operating Partnership and the Advisor desire to make certain amendments to the Advisory Agreement.


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises made hereunder, and for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:


		
	1.
	Amendment to Section 10(g) of the Advisory Agreement.  Effective as of October 1, 2015, Section 10(g) of the Advisory Agreement is hereby replaced in its entirety with the following:




“(g)     Base Management Fee.   The Company shall pay the Advisor a Base Management Fee. The Base Management Fee is equal to $1.5 million, payable on the first business day of each month, plus an amount, payable quarterly in arrears, equal to 0.375% of the cumulative net proceeds of all common and preferred equity issued by the Company and its subsidiaries after a Listing, including: (i) any equity issued in exchange or conversion of exchangeable notes based on the stock price at the date of issuance; (ii) any other issuances of equity, including but not limited to units in the Operating Partnership (excluding equity based compensation but including issuances related to an acquisition, investment, joint-venture or partnership); and (iii) any cumulative Core Earnings in excess of cumulative distributions paid on common stock.”






[Signature page follows.]





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, intending to be legally bound hereby, have duly executed this agreement as of the date first set forth above.


AMERICAN FINANCE TRUST, INC.






By:    /s/ Edward M. Weil, Jr.
Name:    Edward M. Weil, Jr.
Title:    Chief Executive Officer and President




AMERICAN FINANCE OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.


By:    American Finance Trust, Inc., 
its General Partner






By:    /s/ Edward M. Weil, Jr.
Name:    Edward M. Weil, Jr.
Title:    Chief Executive Officer and President
    


AMERICAN FINANCE ADVISORS, LLC


		
	By:
	American Finance Special Limited Partner, LLC, 


its Member


		
	By:
	AR Capital, LLC, 


its Managing Member






By:    /s/ William M. Kahane
Name:    William M. Kahane    
Title:    Manager
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 850 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 850

  To extend the authorization of appropriations to the Department of 
 Veterans Affairs for purposes of awarding grants to veterans service 
     organizations for the transportation of highly rural veterans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 14, 2019

 Mr. Sullivan introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the authorization of appropriations to the Department of 
 Veterans Affairs for purposes of awarding grants to veterans service 
     organizations for the transportation of highly rural veterans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Highly Rural Veteran Transportation 
Program Extension Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY TO MAKE GRANTS TO VETERANS SERVICE 
              ORGANIZATIONS FOR TRANSPORTATION OF HIGHLY RURAL 
              VETERANS.

    Section 307(d) of the Caregivers and Veterans Omnibus Health 
Services Act of 2010 (Public Law 111-163; 38 U.S.C. 1710 note) is 
amended by striking ``2020'' and inserting ``2021''.
                                 <all>
```
### SUBCHAPTER XLIII—PU‘UHONUA O HŌNAUNAU NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK
### §17j. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, act May 26, 1930, ch. 324, §11, 46 Stat. 383; Pub. L. 91–383, §5, Aug. 18, 1970, as added Pub. L. 94–458, §2, Oct. 7, 1976, 90 Stat. 1939, related to traveling expenses of National Park System employees and dependents of deceased employees. See section 101305 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.