alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Quotemedia, Inc. (the Company)
for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Keith J. Randall, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to my best knowledge and
belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                     
|----------------------- |  | --------------------
|By:                     |  | /s/ Keith J. Randall
|Keith J. Randall       
|Chief Financial Officer
|May 14, 2009
#### THE PEOPLE OF THE TERRITORY OF GUAM v. MANUEL P. IGNACIO, Defendant

Criminal No. 136F-75

Superior Court of Guam

May 17, 1976

*313ABB ATE, *Judge*

DECISION

The defendant in this case seeks a reduction of his sentence pursuant to Rule 85 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure.

In the above-entitled action the defendant pleaded guilty to assault by means of force likely to produce grievous bodily harm in violation of Section 245 of the Penal Code. The maximum punishment allowable by law is ten years and this defendant was sentenced to serve five years in the Guam Penitentiary.

The purpose of a Rule 35 application is to afford the sentencing judge an opportunity to review and reconsider his sentence. This, however, should be done in light of any further information. Counsel for the defendant seeks the reduction in order to allow the defendant the possibility of entering the halfway house. This hardly appears to be a compelling reason for reduction. Prior to sentencing, this Court ordered a presentence report, which included a psychiatric examination, and carefully reviewed the defendant’s background. The commission of this crime was one in which this Court hopes it will never encounter, a crime which involved a brutal attack on a young child. The sentence was well within the maximum punishment prescribed by statute.

Motion to reduce is hereby denied.

So ordered.
Memorandum

November 30, 2015

To: Docket EPA-R09-OAR-2014-0636

From: Wienke Tax, EPA Region 9, Air Planning Office

Subject: Impracticability of San Joaquin Valley (SJV) Attaining the 2006 PM2.5 

NAAQS by the Moderate Area Attainment Date of December 31, 2015 

Dena Vallano of EPA Region 9’s Air Quality Analysis Office conducted additional 

analyses with preliminary 2015 PM2.5 air quality monitoring data to confirm that 

attainment of the 2006 PM2.5 standard in the SJV PM2.5 nonattainment area by the 

moderate area attainment date of December 31, 2015 is impracticable. She used

preliminary 2015 PM2.5 data currently in EPA’s Air Quality System (most sites only 

have complete data for 2015 quarters 1 and 2) into the impracticability spreadsheet 

(attachment to this memo). Although still preliminary, the available uncertified 

2015 data are consistent with the 2014 data showing that it is not possible for the 

area to attain the 2006 NAAQS of 35 ug/m3 by December 31, 2015.

Attachment: Practicability of Attaining 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS by December 

31, 2015, excel spreadsheet.
exhibit_10-1.htm










Exhibit 10.1







CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



 



	 
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-101652, 333-137102, 333-153419, 333-206420 and 333-207946) of Partner Communications Company Ltd. of our report dated March 13, 2016 relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 20-F. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading Selected Financial Data in this Form 20-F.







 






	
Tel-Aviv, Israel

	
/s/ Kesselman & Kesselman


	
March 13, 2016

	
Certified Public Accountants (lsr.)


	  	
A member firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited
### SUBCHAPTER XCVIII—STEESE NATIONAL CONSERVATION AREA AND WHITE MOUNTAINS NATIONAL RECREATION AREA
### SUBCHAPTER XXXII—NEZ PERCE NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK
§ 367.3980 Account 398, Miscellaneous equipment. ( a ) This account must include the cost of equipment, apparatus, and other similar items, used in the service company's operations that are not included in any other account of this system of accounts.
( b ) This account must include the following items: ( 1 ) Hospital and infirmary equipment.
( 2 ) Kitchen equipment.
( 3 ) Employees' recreation equipment.
( 4 ) Radios.
( 5 ) Restaurant equipment.
( 6 ) Soda fountains.
( 7 ) Operators' cottage furnishings.
( 8 ) Other miscellaneous equipment.
§ 17.30 Classification challenges. ( a ) Authorized holders of information classified by the Department who, in good faith, believe that specific information is improperly classified or unclassified are encouraged and expected to challenge the classification status of that information pursuant to section 1.9 of Executive Order 12958. Authorized holders may submit classification challenges in writing to the DRC, through the Office of Information and Privacy, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20530. The challenge need not be more specific than a question as to why the information is or is not classified, or is classified at a certain level.
( b ) The DRC shall redact the identity of an individual challenging a classification under paragraph (a) of this section and forward the classification challenge to the original classification authority for review and response.
( c ) The original classification authority shall promptly, and in no case later than 30 days, provide a written response to the DRC. The original classification authority may classify or declassify the information subject to challenge or state specific reasons why the original classification determination was proper. If the original classification authority is not able to response within 30 days, the DRC shall inform the individual who filed the challenge in writing of that fact, and the anticipated determination date.
( d ) The DRC shall inform the individual challenging the classification of the determination made by the original classification authority and that individual may appeal this determination to the DRC. Upon appeal, the DRC may declassify, or direct the classification of, the information. If the DRC is not able to act on any appeal within 45 days of receipt, the DRC shall inform the individual who filed the challenge in writing of that fact, and the anticipated determination date.
( e ) The DRC shall provide the individual who appeals a classification challenge determination with a written explanation of the basis for the DRC decision and a statement of his or her right to appeal that determination to the Interagency Security Classification Appeals Panel (ISCAP) pursuant to section 5.4 of Executive Order 12958 and the rules issued by the ISCAP pursuant to section 5.4 of Executive Order 12958.
( f ) Any individual who challenges a classification and believes that any action has been taken against him or her in retribution because of that challenge shall report the facts to the Office of the Inspector General or the Office of Professional Responsibility, as appropriate.
( g ) Requests for review of classified material for declassification by persons other than authorized holders are governed by § 17.31.
EXHIBIT NO. 99.1



Supplemental Segment Information

|In thousands                     | Three Months Ended
April 30, | Year Ended 
April 30,
|-------------------------------- | ---------------------------- | ---------------------
|                                 | 2003                         | 2002                 
|Orders Received:                 |                              |                      
|Sign Making & Specialty Graphics | $  70,885                    | $  64,352            
|Apparel & Flexible Materials     | 38,922                       | 37,967               
|Ophthalmic Lens Processing       | 21,299                       | 22,429               
|                                 | $131,106                     | $124,748             
|                                 | =======                      | =======              









|                                 | April 30,2003 | April 30,2002 | 
|-------------------------------- | ------------- | ------------- | 
|Backlog:                         |               |               | 
|Sign Making & Specialty Graphics | $     249     | $  1,089      | 
|Apparel & Flexible Materials     | 26,205        | 27,284        | 
|Ophthalmic Lens Processing       | 3,258         | 4,276         | 
|                                 | $29,712       | $32,649       | 
|                                 | ======        | ======        |
### §17c. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, act May 26, 1930, ch. 324, §4, 46 Stat. 382, related to procurement of supplies, materials, and special services to aid permittees and licensees in emergencies; authority of Secretary of the Interior. See section 102712(b) of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.
#### Thomas W. Williams *et al. v.*Bayard Chalfant.

1. Practice—judgment *erroneous as to all defendants if a part are not served.*It is error to render judgment against all the defendants, where it appears that no service has been had upon one; and if judgment is so rendered, it will be reversed as to all, as well those served as the one not served.

2. Service—by *special deputy.*A return on a summons withtiiesheriff’s name and fthe name of a special deputy signed to it, if sworn to by the special deputy, is sufficient.

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court of Marion county; the Hon. Amos Watts, Judge, presiding.

Mr» B. B. Smith, for the plaintiff in error.

Messrs. Baser & Goodnow, for the defendant in error.

Per Curiam:

This was a suit in assumpsit, brought against five defendants. The court below found that service of process had been had on all the defendants, and rendered judgment against them all. This was error, as the return of the summons shows that one of the defendants, James W. Bobb, was not served with process; and the judgment, being an entirety, must be reversed as to all the defendants. *Rider et al.*v. *Alleyne,*2 Scam. 474; *Brockman et al.*v. *McDonald,*16 Ill. 112.

As to another of the defendants, Tucker, the sheriff, by indorsement in writing upon the summons, appointed John W. Wilson his special deputy to serve the same on Tucker. The deputy signed the return of his service on Tucker in this form:

“H. B. Hall, *Sheriff,*

John Wilson, *Deputy.”*

It is objected that this was not sufficient evidence of service by the sheriff. The return is accompanied with a certificate of a notary public that it was subscribed and sworn to before *219him by Wilson, special deputy sheriff. This makes the return to be in conformity with the provision of the statute, in the case of a special deputy sheriff thus appointed to serve a particular summons. R. S. 1874, p. 990; *The Council of Village of Glencoe*v. Owen, 78 Ill. 382.

For error in rendering judgment against one of the plaintiffs in error who had not been served with process, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

*Judgment reversed.*
Exhibit 32

     Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Certification

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18U.S.C., SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     Each of the  undersigned  hereby  certifies,  in accordance  with 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 (as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002),  in his capacity as an officer of Senior  Optician  Service,  Inc.,  (the
"Company"),  that, to his knowledge,  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the
Company for the period ended  September 30, 2007 (the  "Report")  fully complies
with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
of 1934 and that  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the  registrant and will be retained by it and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated: November 14, 2007
                                                       /s/ Patrick Downey
                                                       ------------------
                                                       Patrick Downey
                                                       CEO/CFO
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 48 (Friday, March 11, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 13361]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5643]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XA284


New England Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of a public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The New England Fishery Management Council (Council) is 
scheduling a public meeting of its Scientific and Statistical Committee 
on March 30-31, 2011 to consider actions affecting New England 
fisheries in the exclusive economic zone (EEZ). Recommendations from 
this group will be brought to the full Council for formal consideration 
and action, if appropriate.

DATES: This meeting will be held on Wednesday, March 30 at 10 a.m. and 
Thursday, March 31, 2011 at 8:30 a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Seaport Hotel, 200 Seaport 
Boulevard, Boston, MA 02210; telephone: (617) 385-4000; fax: (617) 385-
4001.
    Council address: New England Fishery Management Council, 50 Water 
Street, Mill 2, Newburyport, MA 01950.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul J. Howard, Executive Director, 
New England Fishery Management Council; telephone: (978) 465-0492.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Wednesday, March 30, 2011-Thursday, March 31, 2011

    The Scientific and Statistical Committee (SSC) will hold a new 
member orientation; discuss the process for upcoming SSC elections; 
provide an update on SSC activities and review the Massachusetts 
Fisheries Institute Report on ``Economic and Scientific Conditions in 
the Massachusetts Multispecies Groundfish''.
    Although non-emergency issues not contained in this agenda may come 
before this group for discussion, those issues may not be the subject 
of formal action during this meeting. Action will be restricted to 
those issues specifically listed in this notice and any issues arising 
after publication of this notice that require emergency action under 
section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, provided the public has 
been notified of the Council's intent to take final action to address 
the emergency.

Special Accommodations

    This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Paul J. Howard, Executive Director, at (978) 465-
0492, at least 5 days prior to the meeting date.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: March 8, 2011.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-5643 Filed 3-10-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
S. 832 

One Hundred Sixteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty 

An Act 

To nullify the Supplemental Treaty Between the United States of America and 

the Confederated Tribes and Bands of Indians of Middle Oregon, concluded on 

November 15, 1865. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. NULLIFICATION OF TREATY. 

The Supplemental Treaty Between the United States of 

America and the Confederated Tribes and Bands of Indians of 

Middle Oregon, concluded on November 15, 1865, and entered into 

pursuant to the Senate resolution of ratification dated March 2, 

1867 (14 Stat. 751), shall have no force or effect. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
§ 29.4 Election to participate by states and localities. ( a ) Any State or locality that wishes to participate in the program shall register with the BJA and request program enrollment materials. Registration forms will be available upon request. Participation in the program is wholly voluntary on the part of the State or locality.
( b ) By electing to participate in the program, a State or locality agrees to do the following: ( 1 ) Make program enrollment materials, including consent forms, available to interested motor vehicle owners;
( 2 ) Collect completed consent forms;
( 3 ) Provide enrolled motor vehicle owners with the decal(s), and license plate(s) applicable to their program condition or conditions and instructions governing program participation;
( 4 ) Take the necessary steps to authorize law enforcement officials to stop motor vehicles enrolled in the program; and
( 5 ) Comply with any other regulation(s) or guideline(s) governing participation in this program.
### SUBCHAPTER II—REVENUES FOR REFUGE OPERATIONS AND THE MIGRATORY BIRD CONSERVATION FUND
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 220 (Thursday, November 14, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 68424]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-27389]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: Vol. 78, No. 217, 
Friday, November 8, 2013, page 67130.

ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF OPEN MEETING:  10 a.m.-12 p.m., Wednesday, 
November 13, 2013.

CHANGES TO OPEN MEETING AGENDA:. Matter To Be Considered: Decisional 
Matter--Voluntary Recall Notice NPR.
    Item Removed From the Agenda: Decisional Matters: FY 2014 Operating 
Plan.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:  Todd A. Stevenson, Office 
of the Secretary, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814 (301) 504-
7923.

    Dated: November 12, 2013.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-27389 Filed 11-12-13; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Marcel de Groot, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Luna Gold Corp.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15) for the registrant and we have:

a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Dated this 7th day of May, 2004.



| | /s/ Marcel de Groot
Marcel de Groot
Principal Financial Officer
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------





---
### SUBCHAPTER LIX–NN—BLACKSTONE RIVER VALLEY NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK