alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-  Home 

# In This Section

                      -  The GLS Today                          -  What does the GLS do? 
                        -  The St. Lawrence Seaway Management Corporation 
                        -  The Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Seaway System 
                        -  Meet the Administrator 
                        -  Meet Our Team 
                        -  Careers at the GLS 
                        -  Contact the GLS 
                      -  Historic Photos and Other Artifacts 

## Contact the GLS

Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation (GLS)Policy HeadquartersU.S. Department of Transportation
1200 New Jersey Ave, SE W62-300Washington, DC20590United States

**Email:**GLS@dot.gov**Phone:**202-366-0091****Alt Phone:**800-785-2779****Fax:**202-366-7147****Business Hours:**8:00am-5:00 pm ET, M-F

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

                            - GLS on Facebook
                            - GLS on Twitter
                            - GLS on Instagram
                            - Great Lakes - St. Lawrence Seaway

# SLSDC Advisory Board Meeting Minutes June 18, 2019

SLSDC Advisory Board Meeting Minutes (06-18-2019).pdf (217.14 KB)

*DOT is committed to ensuring that information is available in appropriate alternative formats to meet the requirements of persons who have a disability. If you require an alternative version of files provided on this page, please contact					latoya.james@dot.gov.*
### §192c. Vested rights

Nothing contained in this section and section 192b of this title shall affect any vested and accrued rights of ownership of lands or any valid existing claim, location, or entry existing under the land laws of the United States on June 21, 1930, whether for homestead, mineral, rights-of-way, or any other purposes whatsoever, or any water rights and/or rights-of-way connected therewith, including reservoirs, conduits, and ditches, as may be recognized by local customs, laws, and decisions of courts, or shall affect the right of any such owner, claimant, locator, or entryman to the full use and enjoyment of his land.

(June 21, 1930, ch. 561, §2, 46 Stat. 792.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
"THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION FOR THE 9 MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1995, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS."
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                             375
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      974
<ALLOWANCES>                                        31
<INVENTORY>                                      1,396
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,910
<PP&E>                                          12,214
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,441
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,377
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,308
<BONDS>                                          4,268
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            73
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,368
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,377
<SALES>                                         10,898
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,898
<CGS>                                            7,458
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,458
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   694
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 299
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,369
<INCOME-TAX>                                       548
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                821
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       821
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     9.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     9.01
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Diane Eiffe, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 701]

Peters, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Herrick, J.), rendered February 14, 2005, convicting defendant upon her plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the first degree.

In satisfaction of a seven-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to criminal possession of a forged instrument in the first degree and waived her right to appeal. She was thereafter sentenced to a prison term of 2V2 to 7V2 years. Defendant now appeals.

We affirm. Defendant’s challenge to the validity of her guilty plea is unpreserved for our review inasmuch as she failed to move to withdraw the plea or vacate the judgment of conviction *(see People v Campbell,*29 AD3d 1083, 1083-1084 [2006]; *People v Cain,*29 AD3d 1032, 1032-1033 [2006]). Moreover, the narrow exception to the preservation rule is inapplicable as nothing defendant stated during the plea proceedings cast doubt on her guilt or otherwise tended to negate a material element of the crime *(see People v Phillips,*28 AD3d 939, 939-940 [2006]; *People v McEnteggart,*26 AD3d 643, 643 [2006]). In any event, the record demonstrates that defendant knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily entered her guilty plea *(see People v Grana,*29 AD3d 1084, 1084 [2006]; *People v Trotter,*28 AD3d 947, 948 [2006]). Finally, given defendant’s waiver of the right to appeal, we decline to review the severity of her sentence *(see People v Vance,*27 AD3d 1015, 1016-1017 [2006]), which we incidentally note was less than the maximum potential sentence allowed for by the negotiated plea agreement.

*986Crew III, J.P., Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 10.23

          AMENDMENT NUMBER 1 TO LEASE AGREEMENT DATED OCTOBER 15, 1999
               BETWEEN THE COMPANY AND BIRTCHER CORNERSTONE, L.P.,
                         A DELAWARE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP


                            AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO LEASE
                                 BY AND BETWEEN
                    BIRTCHER CORNERSTONE, L.P., AS LANDLORD,
                                       AND
                             ENCAD, INC., AS TENANT


         THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO LEASE is entered into and made as of the 19th
day of April 2000 by and between BIRTCHER CORNERSTONE, L.P., a Delaware
corporation ("Landlord") and ENCAD, INC., a Delaware corporation ("Tenant").

                                 R E C I T A L S

WITNESSETH:

         A.       WHEREAS, on or about October 15, 1999, Landlord and Tenant
entered into that certain Lease (collectively "The Lease") for space located at
6059 and 5959 Cornerstone Court West, San Diego, California (the "Premises");

         B.       WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant desire to amend and modify the
Lease in the manner described herein below;

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the Premises recited herein above, the
terms, provisions, conditions, covenants and agreements of this Amendment set
forth herein below, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt
and sufficiency of which is acknowledged by each of the parties hereto, Landlord
and Tenant do hereby agree to modify and amend the Lease as follows:

                                A G R E E M E N T

1.    The defined terms in this Amendment are indicated by initial capital
      letters. Defined terms shall have the same meaning in this Amendment as
      they do in the Lease.

2.    Section 1.3 of the Lease, entitled Term, is hereby amended as follows:

      The commencement date shall be January 27, 2000 and the termination date
      shall be January 26, 2007.

3.    Except as set forth in paragraph 2 above, all terms, provisions,
      conditions, covenants and agreements of the Lease shall remain unchanged
      and in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the
date and year first above written.

"TENANT"

ENCAD, INC.
a Delaware Corporation

By:      /s/   Thomas L. Green
         ---------------------------

Its:     V.P.
         ---------------------------


<PAGE>


Date:    4/25/00
         ---------------------------

By:      /s/  Todd W. Schmidt
         ---------------------------

Its:     V.P. and C.F.O.
         --------------------------

Date:    5/4/00
         ---------------------------

LANDLORD:
BIRTCHER CORNERSTONE, L.P.
a Delaware limited partnership

By:      Birtcher Cornerstone GP L.L.C.,
         A Delaware limited liability company,
         General Partner

         By:      Birtcher ENCAD L.L.C.,
                  a Delaware limited liability company,
                  Its sole Member

         By:      /s/   Robert M. Anderson
                  --------------------------------
                  Robert M. Anderson
                  Member
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



THE GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC.:



We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 2-
92428 on Form S-8, Post Effective Amendment No. 7 to Registration Statement
No. 2-59290 on Form S-8, Post Effective Amendment No. 3 to Registration
Statement No. 2-73205 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-36225 on
Form S-3 of our report dated April 30, 1998, contained in the Company's 1997
Annual Report to Shareholders and incorporated by reference in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K of The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc. for the
year ended February 28, 1998.





Deloitte & Touche LLP
Parsippany, New Jersey
May 26, 1998
§ 15.19 Effective date of a final determination. ( a ) A final determination under § 15.17 shall be provided to the Department of Health and Human Services and sent by certified or registered mail to the individual and to the entity employing or sponsoring such individual if the individual is currently an officer, employee, contractor, or health professional volunteer of an entity described in 42 U.S.C. 233(g)(4) or a health professional, officer, employee, or contractor of a free clinic described in 42 U.S.C. 233(o). In the event the individual is no longer an officer, employee, contractor, or health professional volunteer of an entity described in 42 U.S.C. 233(g)(4), or a health professional, officer, employee, or contractor of a free clinic described in 42 U.S.C. 233(o), the determination shall be sent by certified or registered mail to the individual and to the last entity described in 42 U.S.C. 233(g)(4) or free clinic described in 42 U.S.C. 233(o) at which such individual was an officer, employee, contractor, health professional volunteer, or health professional.
( b ) A final determination shall be effective upon the date the written determination is received by such entity or free clinic.
( c ) A final determination that an individual provider shall not be deemed to be an employee of the Public Health Service shall apply to all acts or omissions of the individual occurring after the date the adverse final determination is received by such entity or free clinic.
( d ) The Attorney General will inform the National Practitioner Data Bank of any final determination under § 15.17 that an individual shall not be deemed to be an employee of the Public Health Service for purposes of 42 U.S.C. 233.
## Breadcrumb

-  Inicio 
-  Programas de Financiamiento 
-  Préstamos Para Reservistas Militares 

## Section navigation

-  Préstamos 
-  Capital de inversión 
-  Asistencia por desastres    -  Préstamos por daños físicos 
  -  Asistencia para reducir daños 
  -  Préstamo de desastre por daños económicos 
  -  Préstamos para reservistas militares 
  -  Incendios forestales en Hawái 
  -  Huracán Idalia 
-  Las fianzas de garantía 
-  Subvenciones 

# Préstamos para reservistas militares

### La elegibilidad

                  -  La cantidad máxima de un Préstamo de desastre por daños económicos para reservistas militares (MREIDL, por sus siglas en inglés) es de dos millones de dólares. 
                  -  La cantidad de cada préstamo se limita al daño económico actual según lo calculado por la SBA, por un seguro de interrupción de negocio y por si el negocio y/o sus dueños tienen suficientes fondos para funcionar. 
                  -  Si su empresa es una fuente importante de empleos, la SBA posee la autoridad para elevar el límite estatutario de dos millones. 
                  -  Las empresas con la capacidad económica para financiar su propia recuperación **no son elegibles** para la asistencia MREIDL. 
                  -  Las leyes federales requieren que la SBA primero determine si el crédito en la cantidad necesaria para efectuar una recuperación completa está disponible primero de fuentes no gubernamentales, sin que esto cree dificultades económicas excesivas. 
                  -  El periodo de tramitación empieza en **la fecha en la cual el empleado esencial recibe una notificación de su llamado al servicio activo** y se acaba **un año después** de que el empleado esencial sea relevado del servicio activo. 

### El uso de los fondos

Puede usar estos fondos para gastos operativos ordinarios y necesarios. Los fondos **no se pueden usar**:
                  - para cubrir ingresos o ganancias perdidas
                  - para el refinanciamiento de deudas a largo plazo o para la expansión del negocio, en vez de incurrir en deudas comerciales regulares

### Términos

                  - Primer pago aplazado por 12 meses   
                  - Sin acumulación de interés durante los 12 primeros meses  
                  - La tasa de interés no superará el 4 %

### Vencimiento

                  - Hasta 30 años, dependiendo de la capacidad para pagar el préstamo
                  - Sin multas ni penalizaciones por prepago   

### Requisitos de garantía

                  - Una garantía es necesaria para todo préstamo MREIDL de más de $50,000.
                  - La SBA acepta propiedades inmobiliarias como garantía cuando estén disponibles.
                  - La SBA no desaprobará un préstamo solo por falta de garantía, pero será necesario que el prestatario ofrezca una garantía prendaria disponible.

### Cómo solicitarlo

Solicite un préstamo MREIDL de la SBA en línea (en inglés).

### Información adicional

Comuníquese con el **centro de asistencia por desastre de la SBA**

Teléfono:  800-659-2955

TTY/TRS:  711

Correo electrónico:    disastercustomerservice@sba.gov
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.4.2


AMENDMENT
TO THE
LIVE OAK BANCSHARES, INC.
2015 OMNIBUS STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN


WHEREAS, Live Oak Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the 2015 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), effective March 20, 2015; and


WHEREAS, the Company has the authority to amend the Plan in accordance with the terms thereof.


NOW, THEREFORE, the following amendment is adopted, effective as of December 17, 2015 (the “Effective Date”).


1.Section 6(h) of the Plan is hereby amended and restated to read as follows:


Individual Option and SAR Limit. The maximum number of Shares with respect to which Options and SARs may be granted to any Grantee in any calendar year shall be One Hundred Thousand (100,000) Shares. The foregoing limitation shall be adjusted proportionately in connection with any change in the Company’s capitalization pursuant to Section 13 below. To the extent required by Section 162(m) of the Code or the regulations thereunder, in applying the foregoing limitations with respect to a Grantee, if any Option or SAR is canceled, the canceled Option or SAR shall continue to count against the maximum number of Shares with respect to which Options and SARs may be granted to the Grantee. For this purpose, the repricing of an Option (or in the case of an SAR, the base amount on which the stock appreciation is calculated is reduced to reflect a reduction in the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock) shall be treated as the cancellation of the existing Option or SAR and the grant of a new Option or SAR.


2.The amendment set forth herein shall apply to all Awards granted under the Plan, whether before or after the Effective Date.


3.Except as set forth herein, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its existing terms.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed on this 17th day of December, 2015, but to be effective as set forth above.


	
			
	 
	LIVE OAK BANCSHARES, INC.

	 
	 
	 

	 
	By:
	  /s/ S. Brett  Caines          

	 
	 
	S. Brett Caines

	 
	 
	Chief Financial Officer
#### American Rolling Mill Co. v. Adkins et al.

June 16, 1939.

Watt M. Prichard, Judge.

Caldwell *&*Gray for appellant.

Woods, Stewart & Nickell for appellees.

Opinion op the Court by

Sims, Commissioner—

Reversing.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Boyd circuit court refusing appellant’s petition for review and to set aside an award entered by the Workmen’s Compensation Board. In his application appellee claimed total permanent disability by reason of inhaling gas while working at a pickier in appellant’s plant in Ash-land, Kentucky. It is appellee’s contention that this pickier gave off noxious gas which affected his lungs and caused him to develop tuberculosis.

The record discloses appellee suffered no traumatic injury and that his disability is not shown to be the direct result of inhaling gas but that he is suffering from a germ disease. The evidence of the medical experts appellee introduced is to the effect that the irritation and inflammation of the tissue of appellee’s lungs, and of the mucous membrane of his nose and mouth were caused by the inhalation of this gas and made the ground fertile for the turbercle-bacilli; but these doctors testified they could not say the inhalation of this gas caused appellee’s tubercular condition.

This is a companion case to American Rolling Mill Company v. Ira Pack et al., decided March 10, 1939, reported in 278 Ky. 175, 128 S. W. (2d) 187. There is no *235material difference in the facts in the two cases and the issues are the same. In the Pack ease the evidence of the medical experts was 'that inhalation of gas from the pickier fertilized the ground for the tubercle-bacilli. As the doctors testified they could not say the gas caused Pack’s tubercular condition, we held there was no evidence of relevant consequence having the fitness to induce conviction connecting Pack’s tubercular condition with the inhalation of the gas, therefore, Pack’s tubercular condition was not compensable.

On the authority of the Pack case, this judgment is xeversed with directions to the circuit court to enter a .judgment sustaining appellant’s petition for review 'and to set aside the award of the Board.
§ 301.303 Time parameters for filing a claim. ( a ) No more than 45 days prior to the date of an inmate's release, but no less than 15 days prior to this date, each inmate who feels that a residual physical impairment exists as a result of an industrial, institution, or other work-related injury shall submit a FPI Form 43, Inmate Claim for Compensation on Account of Work Injury. Assistance will be given the inmate to properly prepare the claim, if the inmate wishes to file. In each case a definite statement shall be made by the claimant as to the impairment caused by the alleged injury. The completed claim form shall be submitted to the Institution Safety Manager or Community Corrections Manager for processing.
( b ) In the case of an inmate based at a community corrections center who is being transferred to a Bureau of Prisons institution, the Community Corrections Manager shall forward all materials relating to an inmate's work-related injury to the Institution Safety Manager at the particular institution where an inmate is being transferred, for eventual processing by the Safety Manager prior to the inmate's release from that institution.
( c ) Each claimant shall submit to a medical examination to determine the degree of physical impairment. Refusal, or failure, to submit to such a medical examination shall result in the forfeiture of all rights to compensation. In each case of visible impairment, disfigurement, or loss of member, photographs shall be taken to show the actual condition and shall be transmitted with FPI Form 43.
( d ) The claim, after completion by the physician conducting the impairment examination, shall be returned to the Institution Safety Manager or Community Corrections Manager for final processing. It shall then be forwarded promptly to the Claims Examiner, Federal Bureau of Prisons, 320 First Street NW., Washington, DC 20534.
( e ) It is the responsibility of each claimant to advise the Claims Examiner of his or her current address, in writing, at all times during the pendency of a claim for Inmate Accident Compensation.
( f ) When circumstances preclude submission in accordance with the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section, a claim may be accepted up to 60 days following release. Additionally, a claim for impairment may be accepted up to one year after release, for good cause shown. In such cases the claim shall be submitted directly to the Claims Examiner, Federal Bureau of Prisons, 320 First Street NW., Washington, DC 20534.
[55 FR 9296, Mar. 12, 1990, as amended at 59 FR 2667, Jan. 18, 1994]
Pictured are two African American Male and Female superhero’s facing eachother, washing their hands 

in a sink with a dual faucet. Under the duo is the text “Alkl superheroes love clean hands!”
### §372a. Acceptance of jurisdiction over part of park; application of laws

The conditional cession and grant to the United States of exclusive jurisdiction over that part of the Hot Springs National Park known as the public camp ground and described as follows: Commencing at the stone marking at the northeast corner of the northeast quarter of section 33, township 2 south, range 19 west, thence east for five hundred and twenty-eight feet along the south line of the southwest quarter of section 27, township 2 south, range 19 west, thence north parallel with the reservation line for one thousand three hundred and twenty feet to the north line of said southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of section 27, township 2 south, range 19 west, thence west for five hundred and twenty-eight feet along north line of said southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of section 27, township 2 south, range 19 west to the east line of Hot Springs National Park, thence south along the line of Hot Springs National Park to the place of beginning, in the county of Garland, State of Arkansas, being a part of the Hot Springs National Park, made by act of the Legislature of the State of Arkansas, approved March 27, 1925, are accepted, and the provisions of section 376 1 of this title, relating to the Hot Springs Mountain Reservation, Arkansas, are extended to said land.

(Mar. 3, 1927, ch. 317, 44 Stat. 1359.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 376 of this title, referred to in text, was repealed by act June 25, 1948, ch. 646, §39, 62 Stat. 992, eff. Sept. 1, 1948. See section 636 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

1 See References in Text note below.