alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Granite Cliffs Incorporated,
on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  December  31,  2004 as filed  with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "REPORT"),  the
undersigned, Ekaterina Luzgina, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: March 31, 2005


/s/ Ekaterina Luzgina
Ekaterina Luzgina
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 367.1823 Account 182.3, Other regulatory assets. ( a ) This account must include the amounts of regulatory-created assets, not includible in other accounts, resulting from the ratemaking actions of regulatory agencies. (*See* Definitions § 367.1(a)(38).)
( b ) The amounts included in this account are to be established by those charges which would have been included in net income, or accumulated other comprehensive income, determinations in the current period under the general requirements of the Uniform System of Accounts but for it being probable that such items will be included in a different period(s) for purposes of developing rates that the utility is authorized to charge for its utility services. When specific identification of the particular source of a regulatory asset cannot be made, such as in plant phase-ins, rate moderation plans, or rate levelization plans, account 407.4, Regulatory credits (§ 367.4074), must be credited. The amounts recorded in this account are generally to be charged, concurrently with the recovery of the amounts in rates, to the same account that would have been charged if included in income when incurred, except all regulatory assets established through the use of account 407.4 (§ 367.4074) must be charged to account 407.3, Regulatory debits (§ 367.4073), concurrent with the recovery in rates.
( c ) If rate recovery of all or part of an amount included in this account is disallowed, the disallowed amount must be charged to Account 426.5, Other deductions (§ 367.4265), or Account 435, Extraordinary deductions (§ 367.4350), in the year of the disallowance.
( d ) The records supporting the entries to this account must be kept so that the service company can furnish full information as to the nature and amount of each regulatory asset included in this account, including justification for inclusion of such amounts in this account.
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-18-00272-CV

____________________

CITY OF BEAUMONT, Appellant

V.

JOSEPH FAZIO, Appellee

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 129808

________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

On August 9, 2018, we abated this accelerated appeal and remanded the case 

to the trial court for rendition of an agreed final judgment in accordance with the 

parties’ settlement agreement. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(C). On August 20, 

2018, the appellant, the City of Beaumont, filed an unopposed motion to dismiss its 

appeal. According to the City, the trial court signed an agreed final judgment on 

August 14, 2018.
2

The appeal is hereby reinstated. The motion to dismiss the appeal is granted 

and the appeal is dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

 ________________________________

 HOLLIS HORTON 

 Justice

 

Submitted on August 29, 2018

Opinion Delivered August 30, 2018

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the “Form 10-K”) of Middleburg Financial Corporation (the “Company”), I, Kathleen J. Chappell, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

(a)    the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(b)           the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company and its subsidiaries as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-K.

 

 
| Date:  March 17, 2008 | /s/ Kathleen J. Chappell               |
|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                  | Kathleen J. Chappell                                                                                         |  
Senior Vice President

 

and Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 

 

  |
### §7464. Identity management research and development

#### (a) In general

The Director shall carry out a program of research to support the development of voluntary, consensus-based technical standards, best practices, benchmarks, methodologies, metrology, testbeds, and conformance criteria for identity management, taking into account appropriate user concerns to—

(1) improve interoperability and portability among identity management technologies;

(2) strengthen identity proofing and verification methods used in identity management systems commensurate with the level of risk, including identity and attribute validation services provided by Federal, State, and local governments;

(3) improve privacy protection in identity management systems; and

(4) improve the accuracy, usability, and inclusivity of identity management systems.

#### (b) Digital identity technical roadmap

The Director, in consultation with other relevant Federal agencies and stakeholders from the private sector, shall develop and maintain a technical roadmap for digital identity management research and development focused on enabling the voluntary use and adoption of modern digital identity solutions that align with the four criteria in subsection (a).

#### (c) Digital identity management guidance

#### (1) In general

The Director shall develop, and periodically update, in collaboration with other public and private sector organizations, common definitions and voluntary guidance for digital identity management systems, including identity and attribute validation services provided by Federal, State, and local governments.

#### (2) Guidance

The Guidance shall—

(A) align with the four criteria in subsection (a), as practicable;

(B) provide case studies of implementation of guidance;

(C) incorporate voluntary technical standards and industry best practices; and

(D) not prescribe or otherwise require the use of specific technology products or services.

#### (3) Consultation

In carrying out this subsection, the Director shall consult with—

(A) Federal and State agencies;

(B) industry;

(C) potential end-users and individuals that will use services related to digital identity verification; and

(D) experts with relevant experience in the systems that enable digital identity verification, as determined by the Director.

(Pub. L. 113–274, title V, §504, Dec. 18, 2014, 128 Stat. 2987; Pub. L. 117–167, div. B, title II, §10225, Aug. 9, 2022, 136 Stat. 1478.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2022—Pub. L. 117–167 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section related to Director's continuance of program to support development of voluntary and cost-effective technical standards, metrology, testbeds, and conformance criteria, taking into account appropriate user concerns.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 849 

To provide for the inclusion on the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Wall of 

the names of the lost crew members of the U.S.S. Frank E. Evans 

killed on June 3, 1969. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 14, 2019 

Mr. CRAMER (for himself and Mrs. GILLIBRAND) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To provide for the inclusion on the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Wall of the names of the lost crew members of 

the U.S.S. Frank E. Evans killed on June 3, 1969. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘U.S.S. Frank E. Evans 

5 Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 849 IS

1 SEC. 2. INCLUSION ON THE VIETNAM VETERANS MEMO2 RIAL WALL OF THE NAMES OF THE LOST 

3 CREW MEMBERS OF THE U.S.S. FRANK E. 

4 EVANS KILLED ON JUNE 3, 1969. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after the 

6 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense 

7 shall authorize the inclusion on the Vietnam Veterans Me8 morial Wall in the District of Columbia of the names of 

9 the 74 crew members of the U.S.S. Frank E. Evans killed 

10 on June 3, 1969. 

11 (b) REQUIRED CONSULTATION.—The Secretary of 

12 Defense shall consult with the Secretary of the Interior, 

13 the American Battlefield Monuments Commission, and 

14 other applicable authorities with respect to any adjust15 ments to the nomenclature and placement of names pursu16 ant to subsection (a) to address any space limitations on 

17 the placement of additional names on the Vietnam Vet18 erans Memorial Wall. 

19 (c) NONAPPLICABILITY OF COMMEMORATIVE WORKS

20 ACT.—Chapter 89 of title 40, United States Code (com21 monly known as the ‘‘Commemorative Works Act’’), shall 

22 not apply to any activities carried out under subsection 

23 (a) or (b). 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
# Holland &Knight 800 17th Street , NW, Suite 1 1 00 \ Washin gt on, DC 20006 

### I T 202.955.3000 

### I F 202.955.5564 Holland & Kn ig ht LLP 

### I www. h klaw .co m Anita M . Mosner (202) 419-2604 anita .mosner@hklaw . com August 12 , 2014 BY ELECTRONIC MAIL Mr. Robert Finamore Division Chief, Foreign Air Carrier Licensing Division (X-45) U .S . Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S .W . Washington , DC 20590 Re: Applications of Air Canada rouge and United Airlines, Inc. (Docket OST-2014- 0136) Dear Mr. Finamore: By Application dated August 8, 2014 , Air Canada rouge ("AC rouge") and United Airlines , Inc . ("United") applied for a statement of authorization and related exemption authority that would enable AC rouge to carry United's "UA*" code on flights AC rouge operates on behalf of Air Canada . AC rouge and United have requested expedited relief in order to begin codesharing as soon as possible . The carriers have polled all interested part ies, and no party has objected to the Appl ication . For this reason , AC rouge respectfully requests that the Department promptly grant the requested authority. Respectfully Submitted ,

nita M. Mesner Attorney for Air Canada rouge cc : Service List

Atlanta I Boston 1 Chicago 1 Fort Lauderdale 1 Jacksonville I Lakeland I Los Angeles I Miam i I New York 1 Northern Virginia 1 Orlando Portland I San Francisco I Tallahassee 1 Tampa I Washington , D .C . IWest Palm Beach
ADHD 

FACT SHEET

What is ADHD? 

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is one of 

the most common neurobehavioral disorders of childhood. 

It is sometimes referred to as Attention Deficit Disorder 

(ADD). It is usually first diagnosed in childhood and 

often lasts into adulthood. Children with ADHD have 

trouble paying attention, controlling impulsive behaviors 

(may act without thinking about what the result will be), 

and, in some cases, are overly active. 

What are some of the signs of ADHD? 

It is normal for children, at one time or another, to have 

trouble focusing and behaving. However, in children 

with ADHD, the symptoms continue instead of getting 

better, and they can make learning very difficult. 

A child with ADHD might: 

■ have a hard time paying attention and daydream a lot 

■ not seem to listen 

■ be easily distracted from schoolwork or play 

■ forget things 

■ be in constant motion or unable to stay seated 

■ squirm or fidget 

■ talk too much 

■ not be able to play quietly 

■ act and speak without thinking 

■ have trouble taking turns 

■ interrupt others 

Deciding if a child has ADHD is a several step process. 

There is no single test to diagnose ADHD, and many 

other problems, like anxiety, depression, and certain 

types of learning disabilities, can have similar symptoms. 

One step of the process involves having a medical exam, 

including hearing and vision tests, to rule out other 

problems with symptoms like ADHD. Another part of the 

process may include a checklist for rating ADHD symptoms 

and taking a history of the child from parents, teachers, 

and sometimes, the child. 

What can I do if I think my child may 

have ADHD? 

Talk with your child’s doctor or nurse. If you or your 

doctor have concerns about ADHD, you can take your 

child to a specialist such as a child psychologist or 

developmental pediatrician, or you can contact your local 

early intervention agency (for children under 3) or public 

school (for children 3 and older). To find out who to 

speak to in your area, you can contact the National 

Dissemination Center for Children with Disabilities by 

logging on to www.nichcy.org/states.htm. 

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 

sponsors the National Resource Center, a program of 

CHADD – Children and Adults with 

Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Their Web site 

has links to information for people with ADHD and their 

families (www.help4adhd.org). The National 

Resources Center operates a call center with trained staff 

to answer questions about ADHD. The number is 

1-800-233-4050. 

In order to make sure your child reaches his or her full 

potential, it is very important to get help for ADHD as 

early as possible. 

www.cdc.gov/actearly


Learn the Signs. Act Early.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 38414

STATE OF IDAHO ,

Plaintiff-Respondent ,

v.

BRODIE RICHARD BYBEE ,

Defendant-Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2011 Unpublished Opinion No. 744

Filed: December 14, 2011

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Twin Falls County. Hon. G. Richard Bevan , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of seven years, with a minimum period of confinement of three years , for felony driving under the influence of alcohol

, affirmed

.

Molly J. Huskey, State Appellate Public Defender; Eric D. Fredericksen, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________
Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge; and GUTIERREZ, Judge

PER CURIAM

Brodie Richard Bybee was found guilty of felony driving under the influence of alcohol

. Idaho Code §§ 18

- 8004, 18

- 8005(6) . The district court senten ced Bybee to a unified term of

seven years, with a minimum period of confinement of three years and retained jurisdiction.

Following the period of retained jurisdiction, the district court suspended the sentence and placed

Bybee on supervised probation for a period of four years. Bybee appeals asserting that the

district court abused its discretion by imposing an excessive sentence.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court ’ s discretion. Both our standard of review and the

factors to be considered in eval uating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and2 need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.

1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Bybee ’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
When something is going on with your 

child, it can be hard to get the full picture. 

Your student assistance professional is 

there to help you develop one.

Student assistance professionals are there to provide the 

support you need. They will work with you, your child, and your 

child’s teachers to develop a complete picture of what’s going 

on and engage resources to help.

www.underagedrinking.samhsa.gov

#TalkTheyHearYou PEP20-03-01-074
HomeLatest FilingsPrevious Page

    - SEC Home  »
    - Search the Next-Generation EDGAR System  »
    - Company Search  »
    - Current Page

C/O ANTARES CAPITAL CREDIT ADVISERS LLC500 WEST MONROE STREET, SUITE 1700CHICAGO IL 60661         

C/O ANTARES CAPITAL CREDIT ADVISERS LLC500 WEST MONROE STREET, SUITE 1700CHICAGO IL 60661         312-638-4000

Antares Private Credit Fund CIK#: 0001976336 (see all company filings)
State location: IL | State of Inc.: **DE** | Fiscal Year End: 1231File Number: **812-15464**

||
||
<PAGE>   1

                                                                EXHIBIT 10.13
International Trade Bank #22621
333 S. Beaudry Ave., 19th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90017


        AMENDMENT TO OUR IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT NO. LASB-227885


Date: March 18, 1996

Beneficiary:
------------
United Pacific Insurance Company
4 Penn Central Plaza
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Attn: Surety Dept.

Applicant:
----------
GIANT GROUP, LTD. issued for benefit for:
Rally's Hamburgers, Inc.
10002 Shelby Road
Louisville, KY 40223

This is amendment number -1- and is to be considered as part of the above
mentioned Letter of Credit and must be attached thereto.

At the request of the applicant, we advise you that the above mentioned Letter
of Credit has been amended as follows:

1.  Letter of Credit deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

"United Pacific Insurance Company
4 Penn Central Plaza
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Attn: Surety Dept.

Amount:  US$ 293,448.00 (Two Hundred Ninety Three Thousand Four Hundred
         Forty Eight and 00/100 United States Dollars)

Expiry Date:  February 28, 1997 at this office


Gentlemen:

We hereby establish our Clean Irrevocable Letter of Credit No. LASB-227885 in
your favor for the account of GIANT GROUP, LTD. issued for benefit for: Rally's
Hamburgers, Inc. 10002 Shelbyville Road Louisville, KY 40223 for payment by
your sight draft(s) at sight drawn on Bank of America NT & SA 333 South Beaudry
Ave., 19th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90017.

We warrant to you that all your drafts under this Clean Irrevocable Letter of
Credit will be duly honored upon presentation of your draft on us at 333 South
Beaudry Avenue, 19th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90017 on or before the expiration
date or before any automatically extended date as set forth below.

Except as stated herein this Clean Irrevocable Letter of Credit is not subject
to any condition or qualification and is our individual obligation which is in
no way contingent upon reimbursement.

Furthermore, this Clean Irrevocable Letter of Credit shall not be subject to
amendment except by written acknowledgment and acceptance of any proposed
amendment by an officer of the beneficiary.

This Clean Irrevocable Letter of Credit is effective February 23, 1996 and
expires on February 28, 1997, but will be automatically extended without
amendment for successive one year periods from the current expiration date and
any future expiration dates unless at least 45 days prior to expiration date,
we notify you by registered mail, return receipt requested or overnight courier
service that we elect not to renew for such additional one year periods. Such
notification shall be to the attention of the Bond Department at the above
address.

This Letter of Credit is subject to the Uniform Customs and Practice for
Documentary Credits 1993 Revision, International Chamber of Commerce
Publication No. 500."

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.


     /s/ CHERYL JEFFERSON                        /s/ CRISTINE PURUGGANAN
  ---------------------------                 -----------------------------
  Authorized Countersignature                      Authorized Signature
§ 401.87 Assessment of costs; Appeals. ( a ) Whenever a hearing is conducted under this subpart, the costs thereof, as defined in this subpart, shall be assessed by the Hearing Officer to the party requesting the hearing unless apportioned between the interested parties where cost sharing is deemed fair and equitable by the Hearing Officer. For the purposes of this section costs include all incremental costs incurred by the Commission, including, but not limited to, hearing examiner and expert consultants reasonably necessary in the matter, stenographic record, rental of a hearing room and other related expenses.
( b ) Upon scheduling of a matter for hearing, the Secretary shall furnish to the applicant and/or interested parties a reasonable estimate of the costs to be incurred under this section. The applicant and/or interested parties may be required to furnish security for such costs either by cash deposit or by a surety bond of a corporate surety authorized to do business in a signatory state.
( c ) An appeal of the assessment of costs may be submitted in writing to the Commission within ten (10) days of the assessment. A copy of the appeal shall be filed with the Secretary and served on all interested parties. The filing of said appeal shall not stay the Hearing.