Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 46 / Wednesday, March 9, 2011 / Notices 12937 

proposes three additional magnet sites 

(Sites 6–8); 

Whereas, notice inviting public 

comment was given in the Federal 

Register (75 FR 51752–51753, 8/23/ 

2010) and the application has been 

processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and 

the Board’s regulations; and, 

Whereas, the Board adopts the 

findings and recommendation of the 

examiner’s report, and finds that the 

requirements of the FTZ Act and 

Board’s regulations are satisfied, and 

that the proposal is in the public 

interest; 

Now, therefore, the Board hereby 

orders: 

The application to reorganize FTZ 72 

under the alternative site framework is 

approved, subject to the FTZ Act and 

the Board’s regulations, including 

Section 400.28, to the Board’s standard 

2,000-acre activation limit for the 

overall general-purpose zone project, to 

a five-year ASF sunset provision for 

magnet sites that would terminate 

authority for Sites 2–3, 6–8 and 12–13 

if not activated by March 31, 2016, and 

to a three-year ASF sunset provision for 

usage-driven sites that would terminate 

authority for Sites 9–11 if no foreignstatus merchandise is admitted for a 

bona fide customs purpose by March 31, 

2014. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 3rd day of 

March, 2011. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration, Alternate Chairman, ForeignTrade Zones Board. 

Elizabeth Whiteman, 

Acting Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2011–5389 Filed 3–8–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

[Order No. 1746] 

Reorganization of Foreign-Trade Zone 

46 Under Alternative Site Framework; 

Cincinnati, OH 

Pursuant to its authority under the ForeignTrade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), the ForeignTrade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the 

following Order: 

Whereas, the Board adopted the 

alternative site framework (ASF) (74 FR 

1170, 01/12/09; correction 74 FR 3987, 

01/22/09; 75 FR 71069–71070, 11/22/ 

10) as an option for the establishment or 

reorganization of general-purpose zones; 

Whereas, the Greater Cincinnati 

Foreign-Trade Zone Inc., grantee of 

Foreign-Trade Zone 46, submitted an 

application to the Board (FTZ Docket 

41–2010, filed 5/21/2010) for authority 

to reorganize under the ASF with a 

service area of Hamilton, Butler, 

Warren, Brown and Clermont Counties, 

Ohio, in and adjacent to the Cincinnati 

Customs and Border Protection port of 

entry, FTZ 46’s existing Sites 3, 4 and 

5 would be categorized as magnet sites, 

and the grantee proposes an initial 

usage-driven site (Site 6); 

Whereas, notice inviting public 

comment was given in the Federal 

Register (75 FR 30774–30775, 6/2/2010) 

and the application has been processed 

pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board’s 

regulations; and, 

Whereas, the Board adopts the 

findings and recommendations of the 

examiner’s report, and finds that the 

requirements of the FTZ Act and 

Board’s regulations are satisfied, and 

that the proposal is in the public 

interest; 

Now, therefore, the Board hereby 

orders: 

The application to reorganize FTZ 46 

under the alternative site framework is 

approved, subject to the FTZ Act and 

the Board’s regulations, including 

Section 400.28, to the Board’s standard 

2,000-acre activation limit for the 

overall general-purpose zone project, to 

a five-year ASF sunset provision for 

magnet sites that would terminate 

authority for Sites 3 and 5 if not 

activated by March 31, 2016, and to a 

three-year ASF sunset provision for 

usage-driven sites that would terminate 

authority for Site 6 if no foreign-status 

merchandise is admitted for a bona fide 

customs purpose by March 31, 2014. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 3rd day of 

March 2011. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration, Alternate Chairman, ForeignTrade Zones Board. 

ATTEST: llllllllllllll

Elizabeth Whiteman, 

Acting Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2011–5391 Filed 3–8–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–533–824] 

Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet 

and Strip From India: Extension of 

Time Limit for Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty New Shipper 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 9, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elfi 

Blum or Toni Page, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 6, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–0197 or (202) 482– 

1398, respectively. 

Background 

On December 21, 2010, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) issued the preliminary 

results of the new shipper review under 

the antidumping duty order on 

polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet 

and strip from India for SRF Limited 

(SRF) covering the period July 1, 2009, 

through December 31, 2009. See 

Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet 

and Strip from India: Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty New 

Shipper Review, 75 FR 81570 (December 

28, 2010) (Preliminary Results). The 

final results of review are currently due 

March 21, 2011. 

Statutory Time Limits 

Section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 

19 CFR 351.214(i)(1), provide that the 

Department will issue the preliminary 

results of a new shipper review of an 

antidumping duty order within 180 

days after the day on which the review 

was initiated, and the final results of 

review within 90 days after the date on 

which the preliminary results were 

issued. However, if the Department 

concludes that a new shipper review is 

extraordinarily complicated, the 

Department may extend the 180-day 

period to 300 days, and the 90-day 

period to 150 days. See 19 CFR 

351.214(i)(2). 

Extension of Time Limit for Final 

Results 

The Department determines that this 

new shipper review is extraordinarily 

complicated because of questions that 

arose after the Preliminary Results 

concerning the bona fides of the new 


Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
12938 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 46 / Wednesday, March 9, 2011 / Notices 

shipper sale. Due to this issue, the 

Department had to issue another 

supplemental questionnaire to SRF, 

provide SRF with time to respond, and 

now must analyze SRF’s response. 

Therefore, in accordance with section 

751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.214(i)(2), the Department is 

extending the time limit for the final 

results from 90 days to 150 days. Thus, 

the final results will now be due no later 

than May 20, 2011. 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(2)(B)(iv) and 777(i)(I) of the Act. 

Dated: March 3, 2011. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2011–5378 Filed 3–8–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–533–825] 

Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet 

and Strip From India: Extension of 

Time Limit for Final Results of 

Countervailing Duty New Shipper 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 9, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elfi 

Blum or Toni Page, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 6, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–0197 or (202) 482– 

1398, respectively. 

Background 

On December 21, 2010, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) issued the preliminary 

results of the new shipper review under 

the countervailing duty order on 

polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet 

and strip from India for SRF Limited 

(SRF), covering the period January 1, 

2009, through December 31, 2009. See 

Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, 

and Strip From India: Preliminary 

Results of Countervailing Duty New 

Shipper Review, 75 FR 81574 (December 

28, 2010) (Preliminary Results). The 

final results of review are currently due 

March 21, 2011. 

Statutory Time Limits 

Section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 

19 CFR 351.214(i)(1), provide that the 

Department will issue the preliminary 

results of a new shipper review within 

180 days after the day on which the 

review was initiated, and the final 

results of review within 90 days after 

the date on which the preliminary 

results were issued. However, if the 

Department concludes that a new 

shipper review is extraordinarily 

complicated, the Department may 

extend the 180-day period to 300 days, 

and the 90-day period to 150 days. See 

section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act; 19 

CFR 351.214(i)(2). 

Extension of Time Limit for Final 

Results 

The Department determines that this 

new shipper review is extraordinarily 

complicated because of questions that 

arose after the Preliminary Results 

concerning the bona fides of the new 

shipper’s sale. Due to this issue, the 

Department had to issue another 

supplemental questionnaire to SRF, 

provide SRF with time to respond, and 

now must analyze SRF’s response. 

Therefore, in accordance with section 

751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.214(i)(2), the Department is 

extending the time limit for the final 

results from 90 days to 150 days. Thus, 

the final results will now be due no later 

than May 20, 2011. 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(2)(B)(iv) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: March 3, 2011. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2011–5383 Filed 3–8–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–821–819] 

Magnesium Metal From the Russian 

Federation: Extension of Time Limit for 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 9, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Hermes Pinilla, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 5, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–3477. 

Background 

On May 28, 2010, the Department of 

Commerce (the Department) published a 

notice of initiation of an administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on magnesium metal from the Russian 

Federation for the period April 1, 2009, 

through March 31, 2010. See Initiation 

of Antidumping and Countervailing 

Duty Administrative Reviews, 75 FR 

29976 (May 28, 2010). On December 17, 

2010, the Department extended by 75 

days the preliminary results of the 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on magnesium 

metal from the Russian Federation. See 

Magnesium Metal From the Russian 

Federation: Extension of Time Limit for 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review, 75 FR 

78968 (December 17, 2010). The 

preliminary results of this 

administrative review are currently due 

no later than March 16, 2011. 

Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary 

Results 

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires 

the Department to make a preliminary 

determination within 245 days after the 

last day of the anniversary month of an 

order for which a review is requested 

and a final determination within 120 

days after the date on which the 

preliminary determination is published 

in the Federal Register. If it is not 

practicable to complete the review 

within these time periods, section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the 

Department to extend the time limit for 

the preliminary determination to a 

maximum of 365 days after the last day 

of the anniversary month. 

We determine that it is not practicable 

to complete the preliminary results of 

this review by the current deadline of 

March 16, 2011, because we require 

additional time to analyze a number of 

complex corporate-affiliation issues 

relating to this administrative review. In 

addition, the numerous extensions we 

have granted for filing various responses 

has contributed to us requiring 

additional time to complete the 

preliminary results. 

Therefore, in accordance with section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.213(h)(2), we are extending the time 

period for issuing the preliminary 

results of this review by 45 days to April 

30, 2011. Because April 30, 2011, falls 

on a Saturday, it is the Department’s 

practice to issue a determination the 

next business day when the statutory 

deadline falls on a weekend, federal 

holiday, or any other day when the 

Department is closed. See Notice of 


Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES