UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549




FORM 10-K




x

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011o

TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934For the transition period from              to




Commission file number:   0-32501




Whitemark Homes, Inc.


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Colorado

25-1302097(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)7350 So. Tamiami Trail, Suite 64

Sarasota, FL

34231(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)





(941) 952-5885


Registrant's telephone number, including area code)





Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:  None





Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:





Common Stock


Title of Class





Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.


Yes o  No x





Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.


Yes o  No x





Indicate by check mark whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.


Yes o  No x





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).


Yes xNoo





Indicate by checkmark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  o





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of "large accelerated filer,"  "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.




Large accelerated filer    o
Accelerated filer  oNon-accelerated filer  o
Smaller reporting company  x





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).


Yes x   No  o





The aggregate market value of the Common Stock of Whitemark Homes, Inc. held by non-affiliates as of the last business day of the registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter June 30, 2011: (72,267,153 shares) based on the closing price of the common stock of $0.0017 was $122,854.





As of February 21, 2012 there were 97,962,131 shares of Common Stock outstanding.





DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:  None.








NOTE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS




This Form 10-K and the documents we incorporate by reference contain certain forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties.  These statements, in addition to statements made in conjunction with the words “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “seek,” “estimate,” and similar expressions, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Safe Harbor provision of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). These statements relate to future events or our future financial performance and only reflect management’s expectations and estimates. The following is a list of factors, among others, that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements:





We undertake no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, after the date of this Form 10-K to conform them to actual results. We do not, nor does any other person, assume responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of those statements. All of the forward-looking statements are qualified in their entirety by reference to the factors discussed under the caption “Risk Factors.”




We caution the reader that these risk factors may not be exhaustive. We operate in a continually changing business environment, and new risk factors emerge from time to time. We cannot predict such new risk factors, nor can we assess the impact, if any, of such new risk factors on our businesses or the extent to which any factor or combination of factors may cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statements. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking statements discussed in this Form 10-K and the documents we incorporate by reference might not occur.




For these statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in Section 21E of the Securities Act.




You should carefully read this Form 10-K and the documents incorporated by reference in their entirety. They contain information that you should consider when making your investment decision.














TABLE OF CONTENTS











PART IItem 1.
Description of Business
3Item 1A.
Risk Factors
5Item 1B.
Unresolved Staff Comments
5Item 2.
Description of Properties
5Item 3.
Legal Proceedings
5Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosure
5PART IIItem 5.
Market for Registrant's Common Equity and RelatedStockholder Matters
6Item 6.
Selected Financial Data.
6Item 7.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditionand Results of Operation
6Item 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
7Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
F-1Item 9.
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
8Item 9A.
Controls and Procedures
8PART IIIItem 10.
Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons; Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act
9Item 11.
Executive Compensation
9Item 12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management And Related Stockholder Matters
10Item 13.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
10Item 14.
Principal Accounting Fees and Services
10Item 15.
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
11SIGNATURES
12












PART I




ITEM 1.   DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS




Whitemark Homes, Inc. (the “Company” or “WTMK” or “Whitemark”) was incorporated under the name Golden Triangle Royalty & Oil, Inc. on July 30, 1975 under the laws of the State of Colorado. The Company was organized primarily to acquire and hold royalties on oil and gas properties. During 1996 the Company’s name was changed to Golden Triangle Industries, Inc. On June 17, 2000, the Golden Triangle shareholders approved the purchase of Whitemark Homes, Inc. It was determined that, after the acquisition, the Company’s business would be strictly that of Whitemark and that the oil, gas and other extractive businesses would be sold. Therefore, in June 2001 the name of the Company was changed to Whitemark Homes, Inc. to reflect the new business direction and Whitemark operated the business of developing and constructing residential communities until 2007. The Company had 2 remaining houses to sell at June 30, 2007. The Company experienced significant difficulty in obtaining financing for projects, acquisitions and construction. The lenders which did provide financing, usually required the personal guarantee of the Company’s former President, Larry White.  Mr. White resigned from the Company on July 27, 2005. After Mr. White’s resignation, no other person, including management at the time would or could provide sufficient personal guarantees to the Company’s lenders.  As a result of the Company’s difficulty in obtaining financing for new project acquisitions, the Company completed its final project and ceased operations.




Effective August 22, 2007, Larry and Patricia White (the “Whites”) sold to TMK Holdings, Inc. a Nevada Corporation (“TMK”) 13,311,977 shares of common stock of Whitemark Homes, Inc., a Colorado Corporation (the “Company”) for a purchase price equal to $250,000. The shares of common stock purchased by TMK from the Whites represented 62.43% of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock of the Company. Mr. Douglas Kanter was the sole officer and director of TMK and became the President of the Company.  Also on August 22, 2007 our current sole officer and director Barry Reese was appointed.




On July 25, 2008 the registrant entered into a Securities Exchange Agreement (the “Agreement”) among the registrant, Blue Sky Oil and Gas Corp. (“Blue Sky”), shareholders of Blue Sky, and TMK Holdings, Inc (“TMK”). Pursuant to the Agreement, TMK deposited 12,311,977 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock in escrow.  Additional shares of such stock were to be issued to shareholders of Blue Sky. Subject to the satisfaction of conditions set forth in the Agreement Blue Sky would have become a wholly-owned subsidiary of the registrant.  Also on July 25, 2008 the Board of Directors elected twonew directors designated by Blue Sky: John Reese and Gurjit Kooner.  Messers. Douglas Kanter and Owen B. Thomas resigned as directors and Mr. Kanter resigned as President.   Barry Reese remained a director and on July 28, 2008 was elected President of the Company. Barry Reese and John Reese are brothers.  Also on July 28, 2008 the registrant issued a certificate for 51,000,000 shares registered in the name of 679600 Alberta Ltd. (the “Alberta Shares”). The Alberta Shares were also held in escrow.  The Agreement did not close and these escrowed certificates were returned to the Company and cancelled.   The Agreement did not close due to the Company’s inability to maintain its SEC reporting.  The 12,311,977 shares held in escrow have been released to TMK.  In addition, 25,618,238 shares of common stock issued to shareholders of Blue Sky prior to abandonment of the Agreement were not returned upon abandonment.  Due to cost and other considerations of pursuing the return of these common shares, the Company authorized the issuance of these common shares.












On January 20, 2009, the Board of Directors approved the engagement of the accounting firm of Salberg & Company, P.A. (“Salberg”) and on September 22, 2010 engaged the accounting  firm of Salberg & Company, P.A. (“Salberg”) to audit the consolidated balance sheets of the Company and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2009 and 2008 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity (deficiency), and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2009.





Due to a lack of capital, the Company fell delinquent in its Securities Exchange Act filings.  During 2010 and 2011, the Company issued convertible notes payable in the amount of $127,492 as of December 31, 2011 in order to finance the filing of its delinquent reports and pursue its business plan of being a Shell Company.  The notes are convertible into common stock at a price per share equal to the average of the lowest three trading prices for the Common Stock during the twenty trading day period prior to the conversion date.





On January 1, 2010, the Company entered into a 24-month consulting agreement (the “Consulting Agreement”) with a consultant (the “Consultant”) for business development services. In connection with the consulting agreement, the Company agreed to pay the Consultant an aggregate of $80,000 which payment shall be evidenced by a convertible promissory note (the “Convertible Note”) in the amount of $80,000. The Consulting Agreement terminated at December 31, 2011. The convertible promissory note is unsecured and was due on January 1, 2012. This Convertible Note does not accrue any interest during the term of this Note, and until 5 business days after the Maturity Date. Thereafter the Convertible Note bears interest at the rate of 15% per annum, which interest shall begin accruing after such fifth day following the Maturity Date, until this Note is paid in full. Interest will be computed on the basis of a 360-day year. The Convertible Note (and any accrued and unpaid interest) shall be convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock from time to time, at the sole option of the Payee until such Note is paid in full, upon 5 days written notice from the Payee to the Company of the Payee's desire to convert the Convertible Note into shares of common stock at the rate of one share of the Company’s common stock for each $0.001 owed to Payee pursuant to the Convertible Note. In connection with this Consulting Agreement, the Company recorded a prepaid expense of $80,000 which will be amortized over the contract term.





In order for the all of the convertible debt to effectively become convertible, the Company must hold a shareholder meeting to approve a reverse split of the outstanding common stock and an amendment to the Articles of Incorporation increasing the authorized capital of the Company.  It is the Company’s intent to call such meeting during the first quarter of fiscal 2012.





The current business plan of the Company is to locate and complete a reorganization or acquisition agreement with a business entity.  The transaction will normally take the form of a merger, stock-for-stock exchange or stock-for-assets exchange.  In most instances the target company will wish to structure the business combination to be within the definition of a tax-free reorganization under Section 351 or Section 368 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.





We believe our business plan provides a method for a foreign or domestic private company to become a reporting company with a class of securities registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.












ITEM 1A.  RISK FACTORS








ITEM 1B   UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS




N/A




ITEM 2.   DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTIES




The Company’s offices are provided by its President at no cost to the Company.





ITEM 3.   LEGAL PROCEEDINGS





NONE




ITEM 4.   MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE















PART II






ITEM 5.   MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS




The only class of equity securities authorized by the Company's Articles of Incorporation, as amended, is 100,000,000 shares common stock, $0.001 par value per share. As of the date of this report, there are 97,962,131 shares of common stock outstanding.  WTMK has ten outstanding notes payable in the aggregate principal amount of $271,386 as of December 31, 2011.  One $80,000 note bears no interest and is convertible at $0.001 per share.  $127,492 of the outstanding notes is convertible into common stock at the average of the three lowest trading prices for the common stock over the 20 trading days prior to a notice of conversion.  The Company cannot at present honor any conversion rights as of the date of this filing as it does not have sufficient authorized and unissued common stock to complete any conversions.  It is our intent to hold a shareholder meeting as soon as possible to request authorization for a reverse split of the outstanding common stock and an increase in the number of authorized common stock to 500,000,000 shares.




The Company's common stock may be traded on an unsolicited basis on the OTC Markets under the symbol “WTMK”.  However there are no market makers and there is no market for the common stock.




As of the date of this report there were approximately 6,922 holders of record of the Company's Common Stock, plus an undetermined number of stockholders who hold their stock in street name.




No dividends on outstanding common stock have been paid within the last two (2) fiscal years or during any interim periods. We do not anticipate or intend to pay any dividends in the foreseeable future.




As of the date of this report the Company does not have any securities authorized for issuance under Equity Compensation Plans.




ITEM 6.  SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA




N/A




ITEM 7.  MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND CHANGES IN FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS




Plan of Operation





The Company intends to maintain its corporate existence and file its required reports pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act  34 and seek out other business opportunities for the Company, including but not limited to reorganization with a privately held business seeking to utilize the Company's status as registered under the Exchange Act.  It is our intent to hold a shareholder meeting as soon as possible to request authorization for a reverse split of the outstanding common stock and an increase in the number of authorized common stock to 500,000,000 shares.





We need additional funding to achieve our plan of operation and to pay for the costs associated with being a public company, including compliance with proxy and shareholder meeting rules and ongoing reviews audits of our financial statements. In the past we have relied on loans to fund our operations, however, we have no written or firm agreement regarding financing.  We estimate requiring approximately $10,000 to $15,000 to complete our shareholder meeting which is primarily the cost of distribution of meeting material to our approximately 7,000 shareholders and legal fees.










As a shell company as defined by in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act, at such time we enter into a reorganization agreement with a privately held business, we Company must file a Form 8-K Current report containing information similar to that of an Exchange Act Registration Statement on Form 10 for any reorganization whereby the Company will commence operations including a description of the transaction, the new business, its management, its financial statements and other information.





Liquidity, Capital Resources and Results of Operations





As of December 31, 2011, the Company had $5,380 in cash and $729,139 in total liabilities compared to $5,380 in cash and $40,000 of prepaid expenses in 2010.  This was prepaid to consultant in the form of an $80,000 promissory note as compensation for services for corporate planning for the twelve months ended December 31, 2010. The note was recorded as a liability along with an offsetting prepaid expense and amortized over 24 months.  We had an accumulated deficit of $28,058,711 at December 31, 2011 and $27,846,380 at December 31, 2010.  We have had no revenue since 2007.  Our operating expenses for 2011 were executive and consultant compensation of $145,000.  We also paid legal and accounting professional fees of $11,737 for fiscal 2011.  Operating expenses for 2010 were executive and consultant compensation of $160,000.  We also paid legal and accounting professional fees of $141,974 for fiscal 2010.   Our loss for 2011 was $212,331 and $354,268 for 2010.





WTMK has ten outstanding notes payable in the aggregate principal amount of $271,386 as of December 31, 2011.  $80,000 bears no interest and is convertible at $0.001 per share.  $191,386 of outstanding principal accrues interest at 8% to 9% per annum.   $127,492 of this debt is convertible into common stock at the average of the three lowest trading prices for the common stock over the 20 trading days prior to a notice of conversion.  Until such time as our common stock is quoted on a recognized securities market, any conversion price would be as mutually agreed by us and the converting note holder.  The Company cannot at present honor any conversion rights as of the date of this filing as it does not have sufficient authorized and unissued common stock to complete any conversions.   $143,894 of principal on three notes is in default as of December 31, 2011.  The remaining notes are payable on demand.





As of December 31, 2009, the Company had $5,495 in cash and $242,655 in total liabilities compared to $5,495 in cash and $104,946 in total liabilities as of December 31, 2008.  We had an accumulated deficit of $27,156,990 at December 31, 2009 and $27,022,890 at December 31, 2008.  We have had no revenue since 2007.  Our operating expenses for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 were compensation of $120,013 compared to $14,795 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.  The 2009 compensation expenses were primarily $60,000 in accrued salary and $58,513 in stock-based compensation.  We also paid legal and accounting professional fees of $99,697 for fiscal 2009 compared to $42,770 for fiscal 2008.   Our loss for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 was $469,222 which included a $246,454 loss on settlement of debt.  Our loss for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 was $2,850,665 which include a loss of $2,791,661 from the abandonment of the July 25, 2008 Securities Exchange Agreement with Blue Sky Oil and Gas Corp.  We received $63,360 in note payable proceeds during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.




Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk




N/A









ITEM 8.     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS







WHITEMARK HOMES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
 
 
 
 CONTENTS
 
  Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
F-2Consolidated Financial Statements:Consolidated Balance Sheets:As of December 31, 2011 and 2010
F-3Consolidated Statements of Operations:For the Years Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
F-4Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ DeficitFor the Years Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
F-5Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows:For the Years Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
F-6Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
F-7 to F-16
  
 
 F-1
 
 
 
 
 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 To the Board of Directors and Stockholders'
 of Whitemark Homes, Inc.
 
 We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Whitemark Homes, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders' deficit, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2011.  These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
 
 We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amount and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements.  An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
 In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Whitemark Homes, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2011, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
 
 The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has net losses and net cash used in operations in 2011 of $212,331 and $12,000, respectively, and has accumulated losses from operations of approximately $28.1 million, a working capital deficiency of approximately $724,000 and a stockholders’ deficiency of approximately $724,000 at December 31, 2011. Additionally, the Company is inactive as of December 31, 2011, currently has no operations or sources of revenue and was in default on certain promissory notes. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
 
 /s/ Salberg & Company, P.A.
 SALBERG & COMPANY, P.A.
 Boca Raton, Florida
 May 8, 2012
 2295 NW Corporate Blvd., Suite 240 • Boca Raton, FL 33431-7328
 Phone: (561) 995-8270 • Toll Free: (866) CPA-8500 • Fax: (561) 995-1920
 www.salbergco.com.info@salbergco.com
 Member National Association of Certified Valuation Analysts. Registered with the PCAOB
 Member CPA Connect with Affiliated Offices Worldwide • Member AICPA Center for Audit Quality
 F-2





WHITEMARK HOMES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS


December 31,


December 31,2011


2010ASSETSCurrent Assets:Cash

$
5,380


$
5,380Prepaid expenses


-



40,000Total Current Assets


5,380



45,380Total Assets

$
5,380


$
45,380LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICITCurrent Liabilities:Convertible notes payable

$
207,492


$
155,492Notes payable


63,894



63,894Accounts payable


190,360



146,928Accrued salaries


211,310



151,310Accrued expenses


56,083



39,184Total Current Liabilities


729,139



556,808Total Liabilities


729,139



556,808Stockholders' Deficit:Common stock $.001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized;97,962,131 and 97,962,131 shares issued and outstanding atDecember 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively


97,962



97,962Additional paid-in capital


27,236,990



27,236,990Accumulated deficit


(28,058,711
)


(27,846,380
)Total Stockholders' Deficit


(723,759
)


(511,428
)Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit

$
5,380


$
45,380













WHITEMARK HOMES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS


For the Years EndedDecember 31,2011


2010REVENUES

$
-


$
-OPERATING EXPENSES:Compensation and related benefits


60,000



60,000Professional fees


96,737



241,974Other general and administrative


20



2,768Total Operating Expenses


156,757



304,742LOSS FROM OPERATIONS


(156,757
)


(304,742
)OTHER INCOME (EXPENSES):Interest expense


(55,574
)


(49,526
)Total Other Income (Expenses)


(55,574
)


(49,526
)NET LOSS

$
(212,331
)

$
(354,268
)Net Loss per Common Share:Basic and diluted

$
-


$
-Weighted Average Shares Outstanding:Basic and diluted


97,962,131



97,962,131














WHITEMARK HOMES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
 For the Years Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
   Additional





TotalCommon Stock


Paid-in


Accumulated


Stockholders'Shares


Amount


Capital


Deficit


DeficitBalance, December 31, 2009


97,962,131


$
97,962


$
27,156,990


$
(27,492,112
)

$
(237,160
)Beneficial conversion feature


-



-



80,000



-



80,000Net loss for the year


-



-



-



(354,268
)


(354,268
)Balance, December 31, 2010


97,962,131



97,962



27,236,990



(27,846,380
)


(511,428
)Net loss for the year


-



-



-



(212,331
)


(212,331
)Balance, December 31, 2011


97,962,131


$
97,962


$
27,236,990


$
(28,058,711
)

$
(723,759
)


WHITEMARK HOMES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
 For the YearsEnded December 31,2011


2010CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:Net loss

$
(212,331
)

$
(354,268
)Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used inoperating activities:Non-cash professional fee


40,000



40,000Interest expense


40,000



40,000Changes in assets and liabilities:Accounts payable


43,432



91,362Accrued salaries


60,000



60,001Accrued expenses


16,899



9,018NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES


(12,000
)


(113,887
)CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:Proceeds from convertible notes payable


12,000



115,492Proceeds from related party advances,net


-



(1,720
)NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES


12,000



113,772Net Decrease in Cash


-



(115
)Cash, Beginning of Year


5,380



5,495Cash, End of Year

$
5,380


$
5,380SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:Cash paid for interest

$
-


$
-Cash paid for income taxes

$
-


$
-NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:Issuance of convertible debt for future services

$
-


$
80,000Beneficial conversion feature related to convertible debt

$
-


$
80,000
 
 WHITEMARK HOMES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 December 31, 2011 and 2010
   NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
 
 The Company
 
 Whitemark Homes, Inc. (“Whitemark” or the “Company”) was incorporated on July 30, 1975 under the laws of the State of Colorado. On April 1, 2000, Whitemark disposed of its prior business operations and acquired Whitemark Homes, Inc. (“Whitemark Florida”) along with certain related entities (the “Whitemark Group”) in a transaction accounted for as a reverse acquisition. Whitemark Florida changed its name to Whitemark Homes of Florida, Inc. and the Company changed its name to Whitemark Homes, Inc. Effective September 30, 2007, the Company discontinued its real estate development operations.
 
 Principles of Consolidation and Going Concern
 
 The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America.  The consolidated financial statements include the Company and its wholly-owned inactive subsidiaries, Whitemark Homes of Florida, Inc., a Florida corporation, which wholly owns Home Funding, Inc, a Florida corporation.  White Homes of Florida, Inc. also holds a 99% interest in two inactive Florida limited liability partnerships; Whitemark at Fox Glen, Ltd. and Sheeler Hills Ltd. and a wholly-owned interest in four limited liability companies; Whitemark at Oak Park, LLC, Whitemark at Corner Lake, LLC, Whitemark at Glenbrook, LLC, and Whitemark at Little Creek. LLC. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements.
 
 As reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company had a net loss and net cash used in operations of $212,331 and $12,000, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2011 and a working capital deficiency, accumulated deficit, and a stockholders’ deficit of $723,759, $28,058,711, and $723,759, respectively, at December 31, 2011. In addition, the Company is inactive as of December 31, 2011, currently has no operations or sources of revenue and is in default on certain promissory notes. .  These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern   The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company’s ability to further implement its business plan which involves identifying a merger with an operating company, raise additional capital, and generate revenues. Currently, management is seeking capital to implement its business plan.   Management believes that the actions presently being taken provide the opportunity for the Company to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.
 
 Use of Estimates
 
 The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses, and the related disclosures at the date of the financial statements and during the reporting period. Actual results could materially differ from these estimates. Significant estimates in the 2011 and 2010 periods include the valuation of deferred tax assets and the valuation of the beneficial conversion features on convertible debt.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 WHITEMARK HOMES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 December 31, 2011 and 2010
 
 NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
 
 Fair Value of Financial Instruments
 
 The Company adopted ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements. ASC Topic 820 clarifies the definition of fair value, prescribes methods for measuring fair value, and establishes a fair value hierarchy to classify the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:
 
 ·
Level 1-Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities available at the measurement date.
 ·
Level 2-Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable, and inputs derived from or corroborated by observable market data.
 ·
Level 3-Inputs are unobservable inputs which reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions on what assumptions the market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on the best available information.
 
 The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheets for cash, accounts payable, accrued expenses, notes payable, and amounts due to related parties approximate their fair market value based on the short-term maturity of these instruments. The Company did not identify any assets or liabilities that are required to be presented on the balance sheets at fair value in accordance with ASC Topic 820.
 
 Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
 The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The Company had no cash equivalents at December 31, 2011 and 2010.
 
 Concentrations of Credit Risk
 
 Financial instruments that potentially subject us to significant concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash. The Company performs certain credit evaluation procedures and does not require collateral for financial instruments subject to credit risk.  The Company maintains its cash in accounts with major financial institutions in the United States. Deposits in these banks may exceed the amounts of insurance provided on such deposits.  As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, there was $5,380 and $5,380, respectively, held in an escrow account maintained by the Company’s attorney and bank deposits did not exceed federally insured limits.  Historically, the Company has not experienced any losses on our deposits of cash.
 
 
 
 
 
 WHITEMARK HOMES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 December 31, 2011 and 2010
 
 
 NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
 
 Income Taxes
 
 The Company is governed by the Income Tax Law of the United States. The Company utilizes ASC Topic 740, "Accounting for Income Taxes," which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the consolidated financial statements or tax returns.  Under this method, deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each period end based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.
 
 The Company applied the provisions of ASC 740-10-50, “Accounting For Uncertainty In Income Taxes”, which provides clarification related to the process associated with accounting for uncertain tax positions recognized in our financial statements. Audit periods remain open for review until the statute of limitations has passed. The completion of review or the expiration of the statute of limitations for a given audit period could result in an adjustment to the Company’s liability for income taxes. Any such adjustment could be material to the Company’s results of operations for any given quarterly or annual period based, in part, upon the results of operations for the given period. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, management believes the Company had no material uncertain tax positions, and will continue to evaluate for uncertain positions in the future.
 
 Stock-based Compensation
 
 The Company accounts for stock-based instruments issued to employees in accordance with ASC Topic 718. ASC Topic 718 requires companies to recognize in the statement of operations the grant-date fair value of stock options and other equity based compensation issued to employees. The Company accounts for non-employee share-based awards in accordance with ASC Topic 505-50.
 
 Advertising
 
 Advertising is expensed as incurred. For the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company did not incur advertising expenses.
 
 Research and Development
 
 Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. For years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company did not incur research and development costs.
 
 
 
 
 
 WHITEMARK HOMES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 December 31, 2011 and 2010
 
 
 NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
 
 Net Loss per Share of Common Stock
 
 Basic net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock, common stock equivalents and potentially dilutive securities outstanding during each period.  Potentially dilutive common shares consist of common shares issuable upon the conversion of convertible promissory notes (using the if-converted method). All potentially dilutive common shares were excluded from the computation of diluted shares outstanding as they would have an anti-dilutive impact on the Company’s net losses and consisted of the following:
 
 Years Ended

December 31,2011


2010Convertible notes


211,842,916



156,994,733Total


211,842,916



156,994,733
 
 These common stock equivalents may be dilutive in the future. The Company’s authorized number of shares of common stock is limited to 100,000,000 common shares and 97,962,131 were outstanding at December 31, 2011; only 2,037,869 additional shares are authorized for issuance as of December 31, 2011.
 
 Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
 In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2010-06, “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements”. ASU 2010-06 requires additional disclosures about fair value measurements including transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2 and a higher level of disaggregation for the different types of financial instruments. For the reconciliation of Level 3 fair value measurements, information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements are presented separately. This standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009 with the exception of revised Level 3 disclosure requirements which are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010. Comparative disclosures are not required in the year of adoption. The Company adopted the provisions of the standard on January 1, 2010, which did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
 
 In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-09, Subsequent Events (Topic 855): Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements.  This amendment addresses both the interaction of the requirements of this Topic with the SEC’s reporting requirements and the intended breadth of the reissuance disclosure provision related to subsequent events (paragraph 855-10-50-4).  All of the amendments in this Update are effective upon issuance of the final Update, except for the use of the issued date for conduit debt obligors. That amendment is effective for interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2010.  The adoption of this ASU did not have an important impact on the Company’s financial statements.
 
   
 WHITEMARK HOMES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 December 31, 2011 and 2010
  NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
 
 Recent accounting pronouncements (continued)
 
 InMarch 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-11, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Scope Exception Related to Embedded Credit Derivatives.  The amendments in this Update are effective for each reporting entity at the beginning of its first fiscal quarter beginning after June 15, 2010.  Early adoption is permitted at the beginning of each entity’s first fiscal quarter beginning after issuance of this Update.  The adoption of the provisions of ASU 2010-11 did not have any effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.
 
 InApril 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-13, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Effect of Denominating the Exercise Price of a Share-Based Payment Award in the Currency of the Market in Which the Underlying Equity Security Trades - a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force.  The amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2010.  Earlier application is permitted.  The adoption of the provisions of ASU 2010-13 did not have an effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.
 
 In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, “Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs,” which did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements upon adoption.
 
 In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, “Presentation of Comprehensive Income.” Under the amendments in this ASU, an entity has two options for presenting its total comprehensive income: to present total comprehensive income and its components along with the components of net income in a single continuous statement, or in two separate but consecutive statements. The amendments in this ASU are required to be applied retrospectively and are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of ASU No. 2011-05 will not have any material impact on the Company’s financial position and results of operations.
 
 In September 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-08, Intangibles — Goodwill and Other (Topic 350). This Accounting Standards Update amends FASB ASC Topic 350. This amendment specifies the change in method for determining the potential impairment of goodwill. It includes examples of circumstances and events that the entity should consider in evaluating whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. The amendments are effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption does not have any material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations.
 
 Other accounting standards that have been issued or proposed by FASB that do not require adoption until a future date are not expected to have a material impact on the financial statements upon adoption.
 
 
 
 
 
 WHITEMARK HOMES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 December 31, 2011 and 2010
 
 
 NOTE 2 – CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTES
 
 Convertible Promissory Notes
 
 During 2010, the Company entered into convertible promissory note agreements with 4 individuals and one third party company for an aggregate amount of $108,182. These convertible note are unsecured, bear interest at 9.0% per annum and are payable on demand.The Holders shall have the right, exercisable at any time from and after the date of issuance of these convertible promissory notes until the respective note is fully paid, to convert the entire outstanding and unpaid principal of these notes, in whole or in part, upon delivery of a notice of conversion into the Company's common stock at the conversion price which shall be the average of the lowest three trading prices for the Company’s common stock during the 20 trading day period ending onetrading day prior to the conversion date, subject to adjustment from time to time for stock splits,stock dividends,combinations, capital reorganizations and similar events relating to the Company’s common stock. These arrangements represent a fixed monetary conversion value of $108,182 based on the variable share quantity to be issued.
 
 On December 9, 2011, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note agreement with an individual for $12,000. This convertible note is unsecured, bears interest at 9.0% per annum and is payable on demand.The Holder shall have the right, exercisable at any time from and after the date of issuance of this convertible promissory note until this note is fully paid, to convert the entire outstanding and unpaid principal of this note, in whole or in part, upon delivery of a notice of conversion into the Company's common stock at the conversion price which shall be the average of the lowest three (3) trading prices for the Company’s common stock during the 20 trading day period ending onetrading day prior to the conversion date, subject to adjustment from time to time for stock splits,stock dividends,combinations, capital reorganizations and similar events relating to the Company’s common stock. This arrangement represents a fixed monetary conversion value of $12,000 based on the variable share quantity to be issued.
 
 Convertible Promissory Note and Related Consulting Agreement
 
 On January 1, 2010, the Company entered into a 24-month consulting agreement (the “Consulting Agreement”) with a Company (the “Consultant”) for business development services. In connection with the consulting agreement, the Company agreed to pay the Consultant an aggregate of $80,000 which payment is evidenced by a convertible promissory note (the “Convertible Note”) in the amount of $80,000. The Consulting Agreement terminated on December 31, 2011. The convertible promissory note is unsecured and was due on the earlier of a) the date the Company raises $80,000 in a private placement of its common stock or entry into alternative loan agreements or b) January 1, 2012. This Convertible Note shall not accrue any interest during the term of this Note, and until 5 business days have passed after the Maturity Date stated above. In the event that this Convertible Note is not paid in full by the end of the fifth day following the Maturity Date, the Convertible Note shall bear interest at the rate of 15% per annum, which interest shall begin accruing after such fifth day following the Maturity Date, until this Note is paid in full. Interest will be computed on the basis of a 360-day year.
 
 
 
 
 WHITEMARK HOMES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 December 31, 2011 and 2010
 
 NOTE 2 – CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTES (continued)
 
 Convertible Promissory Note and Related Consulting Agreement (continued)
 
 The Convertible Note (and any accrued and unpaid interest) shall be convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock from time to time, at the sole option of the Payee until such Note is paid in full, upon 5 days written notice from the Payee to the Company of the Payee's desire to convert the Convertible Note into shares of common stock at the rate of one share of the Company’s common stock for each $0.001 owed to Payee pursuant to the Convertible Note. In connection with this Consulting Agreement, the Company recorded a prepaid expense of $80,000 which was amortized over the contract term. Accordingly, for the year ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company recorded professional fees of $40,000 and $40,000, respectively.  As of the date of this report this loan was in default.
 
 Pursuant to ASC 470-20 and related topics, the Company evaluated whether a beneficial conversion feature exists by comparing the conversion price of the Convertible Note with the fair value of the common stock at the commitment date. In connection with the Convertible Note, the Company recorded a beneficial conversion since the conversion price was less than the fair market value of the common stock. The total beneficial conversion feature included in the $80,000 Convertible Note payable resulted in an initial debt discount of $80,000 to be amortized over the term of the notes with a credit to additional paid-in capital.  For the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company recorded interest expense for the amortization of the debt discount of $40,000 and $40,000, respectively.
 
 On April 15, 2010, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note agreement with the above Consultant for $7,310. This convertible note is unsecured, bears interest at 9.0% per annum and is payable on demand.TheHoldershall has the right,exercisable at any time from and after the date of issuance of this convertible promissory note until the note is fully paid,to convert the entire outstanding and unpaid principal of this note,in whole or in part,upon delivery of a notice of conversion into the Company's common stockat the conversion price which shall bethe average of the lowest three (3) trading prices for the Company’s common stock during the 20 trading day period ending one trading day prior to the conversion date, subject to adjustment from time to time for stock splits, stock dividends, combinations, capital reorganizations and similar events relating to the Company’s common stock. This arrangement represents a fixed monetary conversion value of $7,310 based on the variable share quantity to be issued.
 
 At December 31, 2011 and 2010, convertible promissory notes consisted of the following:
 
 December 31,2011


2010Convertible notes

$
207,492


$
195,492Less: unamortized discount on convertible note


-



(40,000
)Convertible notes

$
207,492


$
155,492
 
 
 
 
 
 WHITEMARK HOMES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 December 31, 2011 and 2010
 
 
 
 NOTE 3 – NOTES PAYABLE
 
 On October 15, 2009, the Company entered into a note agreement with a third party company for $63,360. The note is unsecured, bears interest at 8.0% and was due on March 31, 2010.  During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company converted principal of $26,546 into 42,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, the principal amount due under this note amounted to $36,814 and $36,814, respectively. The note is currently in default.
 
 On December 8, 2009, the Company entered into a note agreement with an individual for $27,080 which was made to convert accounts payable to a note. The note is unsecured, bears interest at 8.0% and was due on March 31, 2010. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, the principal amount due under this note amounted to $27,080 and $27,080, respectively.  The note is currently in default.
 
 NOTE 4 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
 
 Due to Related Parties
 
 The Company’s chief executive officer, from time to time, provides advances to the Company for working capital purposes. At December 31, 2009 the Company had a payable to the chief executive officer of $1,720.  This amount was paid in 2010 with no amounts due at December 31, 2011 and 2010. These advances are short-term in nature, non-interest bearing and are included in due to related parties on the accompanying balance sheets.
 
 NOTE 5 – STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
 
 Common Stock
 
 At December 31, 2011 and 2010, there are not enough authorized shares to cover the conversion of outstanding convertible promissory notes into the Company’s common stock. (see Note 2)
 
 NOTE 6 - INCOME TAXES
 
 The Company has incurred aggregate cumulative net operating losses of approximately $671,000 for income tax purposes as of December 31, 2011. The net operating loss carries forward for United States income taxes, which may be available to reduce future years’ taxable income. These carry forwards will expire, if not utilized through 2031. Management believes that the realization of the benefits from these losses appears not more than likely due to the Company’s limited operating history and continuing losses for United States income tax purposes. Accordingly, the Company has provided a 100% valuation allowance on the deferred tax asset to reduce the asset to zero. Management will review this valuation allowance periodically and make adjustments as warranted.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 WHITEMARK HOMES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 December 31, 2011 and 2010
 
 
 
 
 NOTE 6 - INCOME TAXES (continued)
 
 The Company’s income tax expense (benefit) differs from the “expected” tax expense for Federal income tax purposes computed by applying a Federal corporate tax rate of 34% to loss before income taxes as follows:
 
 2011


2010U.S “expected” income tax


(72,193
)


(120,451
)State income tax


(11,678
)


(19,485
)Non-deductible interest expense


15,800



15,800Non-deductible non-cash compensation


15,800



15,800Change in valuation allowance


52,271



108,336Total provision for income taxes

$
-


$
-
 
 The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2011 and 2010 are as follows:
 
 2011


2010Deferred tax assets:Net operating loss carry forward


265,046



212,775Total gross deferred tax assets


265,046



212,775Less valuation allowance


(265,046
)


(212,775
)Net deferred tax assets

$
-


$
-
 
 The valuation allowance at December 31, 2010 was $212,775.  The increase during 2011 was $52,271.
 
 NOTE 7 – MATERIAL CONTRACT
 
 On October 2, 2008, the Company entered into a 36-month consulting agreement with a Company to provide management services to the Company.  For services rendered the Company agreed to pay the consultant $60,000 per year. For the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company recorded professional fees of $45,000 and $60,000, respectively and payments made to this consultant amounted to $0 and $27,732, respectively. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, amounts due to this consultant amounted to $119,794 and $74,794, respectively, and are included in accounts payable.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 WHITEMARK HOMES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 December 31, 2011 and 2010
 
 
 
 NOTE 8 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
 
 Convertible Promissory Notes
 
 On January 10, 2012, the Company entered into 3 convertible promissory note agreements with 2 third party companies for an aggregate amount of $25,254. These convertible notes are unsecured, bear interest at 9.0% per annum and are payable on demand.TheHoldershall have the right,exercisable at any time from and after the date of issuance of these convertible promissory notes until the notes are fully paid,to convert the entire outstanding and unpaid principal of these note,in whole or in part,upon delivery of a notice of conversion into the Company's common stockat the conversion price which shall bethe average of the lowest three (3) trading prices for the Company’s common stock during the 20 trading day period ending one trading day prior to the conversion date, subject to adjustment from time to time for stock splits, stock dividends, combinations, capital reorganizations and similar events relating to the Company’s common stock. These arrangements represent a fixed monetary conversion value of $25,254 based on the variable share quantity to be issued.
 
 Employment Agreement
 
 On January 4, 2012, the Company entered into an employment agreement with its chief executive officer (“CEO”). The agreement is deemed to have begun on October 8, 2008 and shall continue until terminated.  This agreement shall terminate at any time, with or without cause. The Company shall pay to CEO an annual salary of $60,000. Pursuant to the agreement, the CEO shall have the right exercisable at any time from and after the date of this employment agreement until all accrued salary is fully paid, toconvert the entire accrued and unpaid salary, in whole or in part,upon delivery of a notice of conversion into fully paid and non-assessable shares of the Company's common stock, at the conversion price equal to theaverage of the lowest three (3) trading prices for the Company’s common stock during the 20 trading day period ending onetrading day prior to the conversion date, subject to adjustment from time to time for stock splits,stock dividends,combinations, capital reorganizations and similar events relating to the Company’s common stock. This arrangement represents a fixed monetary conversion value based on the variable share quantity to be issued.





ITEM  9.     CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.




On December 4, 2008,  Moore & Associates Chartered (“Moore”) our auditor for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 resigned as our auditors.  On December 4, 2008, Moore sent a letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission informing the Commission that the Company’s interim financials for the period ended September 30, 2008 were filed without auditor review and further stating that Moore had advised that these financials should not be relied on. The Company had engaged Moore to review the filings and was under the belief that the interim financials referenced in Moore’s letter had in fact been reviewed by Moore at the time of such filing.  On August 27, 2009, the Public Company Accounting  Oversight Board (the “PCAOB”) revoked the  registration  of Moore.  The PCAOB imposed the sanction on the basis of its findings concerning Moore’s violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), Rule 10b-5 of the Exchange Act, PCAOB rules and auditing standards in auditing the financial statements of three issuer clients from 2006 to 2008, PCAOB rules and quality control standards and noncooperation with a PCAOB investigation.  In a related enforcement action by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”), in addition to certain monetary penalties, Moore agreed to be permanently enjoined from future securities violations and to be suspended from appearing or practicing before the Commission as accountants.





On January 20, 2009, the Board of Directors approved the engagement of the accounting firm of Salberg & Company, P.A. (“Salberg”) and on September 22, 2010,  engaged the accounting  firm of Salberg & Company, P.A. as its independent registered public accounting firm.




ITEM 9A.    CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.




The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the Company's Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company's management, including its Chief Executive Officer / Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure based closely on the definition of "disclosure controls and procedures" in Rule 13a-15(e).





As of December 31, 2011, the Company's Chief Executive Officer /Chief Financial Officer carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the foregoing, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were not effective.




Report of Management on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
  Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the company. Internal control over financial reporting is a process to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  Internal control over financial reporting includes maintaining records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect our transactions; providing reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary for preparation of our financial statements; providing reasonable assurance that receipts and expenditures of company assets are made in accordance with management authorization; and providing reasonable assurance that unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of company assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements would be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting is not intended to provide absolute assurance that a misstatement of our financial statements would be prevented or detected.
  In connection with the preparation of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting, pursuant to Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act. In making this assessment, they used the criteria set forth by theCommittee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control -- Integrated Framework.Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded and reported to the Board of Directors that the design and operation of our internal controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2011 due to material weaknesses in the system of internal control.
   
 Specifically, management identified the following control deficiencies. (1) The Company has not properly segregated duties as only one individual initiates, authorizes, and completes all transactions. The Company has not implemented measures that would prevent the individual from overriding the internal control system.  The Company does not believe that this control deficiency has resulted in deficient financial reporting because the Chief Financial Officer is aware of his responsibilities under the SEC's reporting requirements and personally certifies the financial reports.  (2) The Company has not installed accounting software that prevent erroneous or unauthorized changes to previous reporting periods and its software does not provide an adequate audit trail of entries made in the accounting software.
  The Company does not think that this control deficiency has resulted in deficient financial reporting because the Company does not have any assets other than a checking account with a small balance.  Also, given that the amount owed to our Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer as a result of his maintaining the corporate existence and SEC reporting far exceeds the assets of the Company, the risk of the lack of effectiveness of internal controls is further mitigated.
  Accordingly, while the Company has identified certain material weaknesses in its system of internal control over financial reporting, it believes that it has taken reasonable steps to ascertain that the financial information contained in this report is in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.  Management has determined that current resources would be appropriately applied elsewhere and when resources permit, the Company will alleviate material weaknesses through various steps.  The foregoing notwithstanding, management still concludes that its internal controls over financial reporting are not effective.
  There have been no material changes in the Company's internal controls or in other factors during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect our internal controls over financial reporting.


PART III




ITEM 10.  DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, PROMOTERS AND CONTROL PERSONS; COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT




Barry Reese, 49 years old, is the Company’s sole officer and director and has been since 2008.  Mr. Reese has owned and operated Danielsen Plumbing LLC since 1992.   Mr. Reese has been a State of Florida certified plumbing contractor since 1992 and has been in good standing with the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation Construction Industry Licensing Board since 1985.




Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance





Based solely on a review of reports filed with the Company, all reports regarding transactions in the Company's securities required to be filed for 2006 by Section 16(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, were not filed.





Code of Ethics





On April 8, 2004, the Board of Directors of the Company adopted a written Code of Ethics designed to deter wrongdoing and promote honest and ethical conduct, full, fair and accurate disclosure, compliance with laws, prompt internal reporting and accountability to adherence to the Code of Ethics. This Code of Ethics has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an Exhibit to Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003.




As the Company only has one Director, the Company does not have a Compensation, Audit or Nominating Committee and the usual functions of such committees are currently performed by the sole Director. The Company does not have an audit committee financial expert. The Director believes that he is capable of analyzing and evaluating the financial statements and understanding internal controls and procedures for financial reporting.




ITEM 11.   EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION




Our President has a written employment agreement with WTMK for accrued salary for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011 while accruing salary for the current fiscal year $60,000 per year.  The accrued salary is convertible into common stock at the average of the three lowest trading prices for the common stock over the 20 trading days prior to a notice of conversion.  As of December 31, 2011, Mr. Reese had accrued $194,795 in salary.  The Company cannot at present honor any conversion rights as of the date of this filing as it does not have sufficient authorized and unissued common stock to complete any conversions.  It is our intent to hold a shareholder meeting as soon as possible to request authorization for a reverse split of the outstanding common stock and an increase in the number of authorized common stock to 500,000,000 shares.  There is no other executive or director compensation.











ITEM 12.    SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT




The following table sets forth the number of shares of the Company’s common stock beneficially owned as of the date of this report by our sole officer and director and shareholders holding more than 5% of our common stock.  As of the date of this report, there were 97,962,131 shares outstanding.





Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
Title
Common Stock Ownership
Percentage of Shares Outstanding (%)Barry Reese (1)

7350 So. Tamiami Trail, Suite 64

Sarasota, FL 34231
CEO, CFO, Director
8,000,000
8.2%TMK Holdings, Inc. (2)

1535 Bay Point Dr

Sarasota, FL 34236
>5% Shareholder
12,311,977
12.7%Alberta Equity Holdings, Inc. (3)

1800 2nd Street, Suite 735

Sarasota, FL 34236
>5% Shareholder
5,383,000
5.5%(1) Does not include any shares issuable upon conversion of $120,000 of accrued salary, as the Company does not currently have sufficient shares of authorized and unissued common stock to to issue any shares of common stock pursuant to a conversion.



(2)  Mr. Douglas Kanter is the sole officer and director of TMK.  The Registrant has had no relationship with TMK or Mr. Kanter since 2007.



(3)  Mr. Randy Lee Fitzgerald is the control person of Alberta Equity Holdings, Inc.  The Registrant has had no relationship with Alberta Equity Holdings, Inc., or Mr. Fitzgerald since 2007.







ITEM 13.    CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS




None.




ITEM 14.    PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES





Audit FeesThe Company paid the following audit fees for the fiscal years indicated:




2011

$
5,3002010

$
5,3002009

$
19,0002008

$
19,000






Audit-Related Fees




Fees for audit related services for the fiscal years ended 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011 were $0.









Tax Fees




There were no fees for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning for the fiscal years ended 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011





All Other Fees




There were no other aggregate fees billed in either for the fiscal years ended 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011  other than the services reported above.




ITEM 15.    EXHIBITS




Reference








Exhibit

Number

Description

Reference3.i.1

Articles of Incorporation

(1)3.i.2

Articles of Amendment  dated May 3, 1999

(1)3.i.3

Articles of Amendment dated March 29, 2010

(2)3(ii)

By-Laws

*10.1

Reese Employment Agreement

*31.1

Section 302 Certification - Chief Executive Officer / Chief Financial Officer

*32.1

Section 1350 Certification - Chief Financial Officer

*





(1)
Incorporated by Reference from Form 10-SB filed December 1, 2000(2)
Incorporated by Reference from Form 8-K filed on April 4, 2010*
Filed Herewith














SIGNATURES






In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


Whitemark Homes, Inc.Date:  May 1, 2012
By:
/s/ Barry ReesePresident / Chief Executive Officer / Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
  
 In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated, who constitute the entire board of directors:
  By:
/s/ Barry ReeseName:
Barry ReeseTitle:
Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and DirectorDate:
May 1, 2012