alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

### Sutton, Tia

From: Timothy.Mullins@dot.gov Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2015 11:22 AM To: Sutton, Tia; Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov Cc: Chandana_L._Achanta@omb.eop.gov Subject: RE: DO NOT send materials I sent- just got word tha t DOT will be sending a revised version Attachments: HD Phase 2 NPRM Interagency Briefing for April 7 20 15.pptx

Yes, I was just sent the attached final version. M y understanding is that it’s the same but for a cou ple minor formatting changes. Thanks, Tim

From: Sutton, Tia [mailto:sutton.tia@epa.gov] Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2015 11:21 AM To: Whiteman, Chad; Mullins, Timothy (OST) Cc: Achanta, Chandana L. Subject: DO NOT send materials I sent- just got word that D OT will be sending a revised version Importance: High

Sorry- hopefully you haven’t hit send yet. Just g ot word that new materials are coming from DOT, and that they will be handling printing.

From: Sutton, Tia Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2015 11:06 AM To: 'Whiteman, Chad'; 'Timothy.Mullins@dot.gov' Cc: Achanta, Chandana L. Subject: RE: HD GHG overview briefing -- CONFIRMED for 4/7 at 2pm Importance: High

Materials are attached! I’ll leave things to you g uys for sending out to those calling in, but how di d you want to handle copies for those in the room – are you guys making copies, or should we bring them over? If you need us to bring them, just let me know how many copies.

Thanks! -Tia

From: Whiteman, Chad [ mailto:Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov ] Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2015 11:00 AM To: Sutton, Tia; 'Timothy.Mullins@dot.gov' Cc: Achanta, Chandana L. Subject: RE: HD GHG overview briefing -- CONFIRMED for 4/7 at 2pm Importance: High

Have you folks provided an electronic version of th e briefing yet? We need to send it out to the inte ragency reviewers prior to the call. If you have already emailed it, my apologies, although if you could send it again that would be great. Thanks, Chad
is your superpower !

CS294906-E www.cdc.gov/handwashing
Exhibit99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of The Goldfield Corporation (the"Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2002 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Stephen R. Wherry, Vice President, Treasurer and ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                    (1)   The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

                    (2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 

/s/ Stephen R. WherryStephen R. Wherry Vice President, Treasurer and      Chief Financial Officer April 28, 2003
§ 801.4 Project review. ( a ) The Compact provides generally that no project affecting the water resources of the basin shall be undertaken by any person, governmental authority, or other entity prior to approval by the Commission.
( b ) In many instances, one or more of the signatory parties will exercise project review authority regarding proposed projects in the basin coming under the review of the Commission. Accordingly the Commission will direct its attention to reviewing the completeness and effectiveness of the review procedures of the signatories and will endeavor to minimize duplication of staff effort, and time and cost to the applicant.
( c ) The Commission will establish exempt categories in accordance with the section 3.10-3 of the Compact, and for projects determined not to have a substantial effect on the water resources of the basin. In dealing with Federal or federally licensed projects, the Commission will take the provisions of reservations (r) and (w) of United States Pub. L. 91-575 (84 Stat. 1509) and provisions of the Compact into account.
( d ) It is expected that project review procedures will be modified following adoption of the comprehensive plan. In the meantime the Commission will: ( 1 ) Base its review and comments pertaining to proposed projects within the basin coming under the purview of the Commission, on review and comments of signatory parties. In general, the Commission review will seek to ascertain the completeness of procedures followed by the signatory parties in their review, and will refrain from specifically rechecking detailed evaluations. (Susquehanna River Basin Commission Resolution No. 72-5)
( 2 ) Require as it determines necessary, submission of pertinent project plans and documents for its independent review and approval. The purpose of this review will be to ascertain whether all relevant provisions of the Compact and actions taken pursuant thereto have been observed: ( i ) When the Commission has determined that a project may have significant effect on the water resources of the basin.
( ii ) When a proposed project does not fall under the review jurisdiction of any agency of the signatory parties.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6044

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

WALTER LOMAX CAMPBELL,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (6:06-cr-00812-HMH-1)

Submitted: April 29, 2009 Decided: May 19, 2009

Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Walter Lomax Campbell, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean Howard, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Walter Lomax Campbell appeals the district court’s
order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for

reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Campbell , No. 6:06-cr00812-HMH-1 (D.S.C. Dec. 17, 2008). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
http://pubs.usgs.gov/sim/3035/fred-kp_readme.txtDescription of digital dataset files posted on this website:fred-kp_readme.txt - this filefred-kp_meta.txt - FGDC compliant metadata. Each Geodatabase Feature Class also has its own metadata.fred-kp_db.zip - zipped package of files necessary to create an ArcMap Personal Geodatabase project.    -- readme_fred-kp_db.txt    -- fredonia100k-kp.mdb - Personal Geodatabase    -- fredonia100k-kp.style - ArcMap style for symbolizing data    -- fred_base.zip - zipped 1:100,000-scale DRG basefred-kp_shape.zip - zipped package of Feature Classes converted to shapefiles to facilitate use of the data in ArcMap and other applications.    -- readme_fred-kp_shape.txt    -- fredonia100k-kp.style - ArcMap style for symbolizing data    -- fred_base.zip - zipped 1:100,000-scale DRG base    -- Shapefiles include:      -- fred-kp_atd.shp - attitudes, joints, fault offsets, domes      -- fred-kp_fld.shp - folds      -- fred-kpglg_arc.shp - geologic contacts and faults      -- fred-kpglg_poly100k.shp - geologic unit polygons, 1:100,000-scale       -- fred-kpglg_poly24k.shp - geologic unit polygons, 1:24,000-scale      -- fred-kpglg_pt.shp - geologic unit labels      -- fred-kp_kar.shp - karst features      -- fred-kp_min.shp - mines      -- fred-kp_sec.shp - cross section lines      -- fred-kp_vlf.shp - volcanic line features      -- fred-kp_vpf.shp - volcanic point features
§ 30.1 What is the purpose of these regulations? ( a ) The regulations in this part implement Executive Order 12372, “Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs,” issued July 14, 1982 and amended on April 8, 1983. These regulations also implement applicable provisions of section 401 of the Intergovernmental Cooperation Act of 1968 and section 204 of the Demonstration Cities and Metropolitan Development Act of 1966.
( b ) These regulations are intended to foster an intergovernmental partnership and a strengthened Federalism by relying on state processes and on state, areawide, regional, and local coordination for review of proposed federal financial assistance and direct federal development.
( c ) These regulations are intended to aid the internal management of the Department, and are not intended to create any right or benefit enforceable at law by a party against the Department or its officers.
-  Home 
-  About Us 

# In This Section

                      -  The GLS Today                          -  What does the GLS do? 
                        -  The St. Lawrence Seaway Management Corporation 
                        -  The Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Seaway System 
                        -  Meet the Administrator 
                        -  Meet Our Team 
                        -  Careers at the GLS 
                        -  Contact the GLS 
                      -  Historic Photos and Other Artifacts 

## Related Links

                  -                                          American Anchor - Stories From The Great Lakes & St. Lawrence Seaway                   

# American Anchor - The Supply Chain of Steel

There is no one hero in the story of the Great Lakes. The economic prosperity of the region is due to the efficient and symbiotic connection of The Saint Lawrence Seaway, Great Lakes ports, foreign and domestic vessels, manufacturers, companies, the employees that work there, and their relationship to their local communities. This supply chain is a foundation of our country’s economy. The backbone of our society. It is America’s Anchor. Learn more at www.greatlakesseaway.org

## STORIES FROM THE GREAT LAKES & ST. LAWRENCE SEAWAY
#### § 104.52 Distribution of award to decedent's beneficiaries.

The Personal Representative shall distribute the award in a manner consistent with the law of the decedent's domicile or any applicable rulings made by a court of competent jurisdiction. The Special Master may require the Personal Representative to provide to the Special Master a plan for distribution of any award received from the Fund before payment is authorized. Notwithstanding any other provision of these regulations or any other provision of state law, in the event that the Special Master concludes that the Personal Representative's plan for distribution does not appropriately compensate the victim's spouse, children, or other relatives, the Special Master may direct the Personal Representative to distribute all or part of the award to such spouse, children, or other relatives.
### §1414. Repealed. Pub. L. 105–42, §6(c), Aug. 15, 1997, 111 Stat. 1130

Section, Pub. L. 92–522, title III, §304, as added Pub. L. 102–523, §2(a), Oct. 26, 1992, 106 Stat. 3428, related to reviews, reports, and recommendations by Secretary of Commerce.

A prior section 304 of Pub. L. 92–522 was renumbered section 404 and is classified to section 1421c of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

For effective date of repeal, see section 8 of Pub. L. 105–42, set out as an Effective Date of 1997 Amendment note under section 1362 of this title.
# C_2011252EN.01001202.xml

| 27.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/12

---

Appeal brought on 13 May 2011 by Longevity Health Products, Inc against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 9 March 2011 in Case T-190/09 Longevity Health Products, Inc v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs); other party: Performing Science LLC

(Case C-222/11 P)

2011/C 252/24

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Longevity Health Products, Inc (represented by: J. Korab, Rechtsanwalt)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Performing Science LLC

Other parties to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare the appeal by the company Longevity Health Products, Inc admissible; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare the appeal by the company Longevity Health Products, Inc admissible;

| — | Set aside the judgment of the General Court of 9 March 2011 in Case T-190/09; |
| --- | --- |

—

Set aside the judgment of the General Court of 9 March 2011 in Case T-190/09;

| — | Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The restriction of the right to register a mark can be justified only in the public interest, for example in order to avoid a possible deception of certain trade circles. That can however be excluded in the present case because both experts and lay people are able to distinguish between the trade mark wording 5 HTP and the systematic designation for 5-hydroxy-tryptophan.

Experts such as chemists and veterinary surgeons are aware that even minor changes in chemical nomenclature terms or chemical formulae could lead to significant differences in substance structure. That circle of persons would therefore without further consideration continue to use the correct chemical designation, which is not the same as the trade mark.

‘Informed persons’, that is lay people and consumers interested in the products concerned, are also aware that the designations of different substances drawn from chemical nomenclature may differ only slightly, but that a minimal name difference is in fact associated with massive differences in the pharmacological, chemical or physical characteristics of those substances.

Lay persons who are not interested in the products concerned are in any case not able to recognise any connection between the trade mark name 5 HTP and the substance 5-hydroxy-tryptophan and therefore cannot also be misled thereby.

---
<PAGE>    1
                                 EXHIBIT 10.8(ii)



                                AMENDMENT NO. 1
                                     TO THE
                          GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION
                     1995 SHAREHOLDER VALUE INCENTIVE PLAN


     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors (the "Board") of Georgia-Pacific
Corporation (the "Corporation") adopted the Georgia-Pacific Corporation 1995
Shareholder Value Incentive Plan (the "SVIP") effective April 1, 1995, and the
SVIP was thereafter approved by the shareholders of the Corporation;

     WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 5.1 of the SVIP, the Board has retained the
authority to amend the SVIP from time to time, subject to certain limitations;
and

     WHEREAS, the Board deems it desirable to amend the SVIP to permit grants
under the SVIP during the first quarter of any calendar year;

     NOW, THEREFORE, the Board hereby amends the SVIP as follows effective
January 1, 1996:

     The second full sentence of Section 2.1 of the SVIP is amended by deleting
the proviso at the end thereof, so that as modified, the sentence reads as
follows:

         "Prior to each Grant Date following the Effective Date, the
          Committee, in its sole discretion, shall designate the
          Employees who shall become Participants in this Plan at each
          such Grant Date."

     Except as modified in this Amendment, the SVIP, as in effect from April 1,
1995, shall remain in full force and effect.
### **CHAPTER 16—TUNA CONVENTIONS**

Sec.
951.
Definitions.
952.
Commissioners.
953.
General Advisory Committee and Scientific Advisory Subcommittee.
954.
Repealed.
955.
Rulemaking.
956.
Inspection of returns, records, or other reports.
957.
Violations; fines and forfeitures; application of related laws.
958.
Cooperation with other agencies.
959.
Enforcement.
960.
Commissions' functions not restrained by this chapter or State laws.
961.
Authorization of appropriations.
962.
Reduction of bycatch in eastern tropical Pacific Ocean.
-  Home 

# In This Section

                      -  The GLS Today                          -  What does the GLS do? 
                        -  The St. Lawrence Seaway Management Corporation 
                        -  The Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Seaway System 
                        -  Meet the Administrator 
                        -  Meet Our Team 
                        -  Careers at the GLS 
                        -  Contact the GLS 
                      -  Historic Photos and Other Artifacts 

# GLS Advisory Board meeting minutes June 24, 2021

Advisory Board Meeting Minutes (06-24-2021).pdf (301.12 KB)

*DOT is committed to ensuring that information is available in appropriate alternative formats to meet the requirements of persons who have a disability. If you require an alternative version of files provided on this page, please contact					LaToya.James@dot.gov.*
USA

Reference: 0/01/01-02.02.187

Your reference:Our reference: lJl

Contact person: Laurence Fontana Jungo

Tel. +41 31 3230410, Fax +41 31 32592 12, Laurence.fontana-jungobazl.admin.ch

Ittigen, 28 August 2014

Deciaration of Reciprocity

Dear Mr. Gretch /

The Federal Office of Civil Aviation of Switzerland herewith declares, that it will consider applications

by U.S. air carriers for approval to operate charters to and from Switzerland in accordance with theprovisions of the Air Transport Agreement between the Swiss Confederation and the United States of

America, dated 21 June 2010, and, for those charters not specified in the Annex to the Agreement, on

the basis of comity and reciprocity.

Yours sincerely

.

Marcel Zuckschwerdt Laurence Fontana Jungo

Director Chief Negotiator Air Services AgreementsHead Aviation Policy and Strategy

Federal Office of Civil AviationMühlestrasse 3, 3063 IttigenPostal address: CH-3003 Bem

Tel. ÷41 31 325 80 39/40, Fax +41 31 325 80 32www.aviation.admin.ch
### §1901. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, Pub. L. 94–429, §1, Sept. 28, 1976, 90 Stat. 1342, related to Congressional findings and declaration of policy. See section 100731 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.
§ 115.122 Policies to ensure referrals of allegations for investigations. ( a ) The agency shall ensure that an administrative or criminal investigation is completed for all allegations of sexual abuse and sexual harassment.
( b ) If another law enforcement agency is responsible for conducting investigations of allegations of sexual abuse or sexual harassment in its lockups, the agency shall have in place a policy to ensure that such allegations are referred for investigation to an agency with the legal authority to conduct criminal investigations, unless the allegation does not involve potentially criminal behavior. The agency shall publish such policy, including a description of responsibilities of both the agency and the investigating entity, on its Web site, or, if it does not have one, make available the policy through other means. The agency shall document all such referrals.
( c ) Any State entity responsible for conducting administrative or criminal investigations of sexual abuse or sexual harassment in lockups shall have in place a policy governing the conduct of such investigations.
( d ) Any Department of Justice component responsible for conducting administrative or criminal investigations of sexual abuse or sexual harassment in lockups shall have in place a policy governing the conduct of such investigations.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           4,447
<SECURITIES>                                    47,041
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,968
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,525
<INVENTORY>                                      1,273
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                97,012
<PP&E>                                          92,686
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,824
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 193,885
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,804
<BONDS>                                        145,308
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           290
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,149
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   193,885
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,036
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,381
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,734
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,255
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,806)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,100)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,705)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,705)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32: Rule 13a-14(b) Certification  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Senior Optician Service, Inc. (the Company) certifies that: 1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date:  November 18, 2008 By: /s/ Honggang Yu  Honggang Yu, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
**UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD ANN ARBOR, MI 48105
- 2498

OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION July 21 , 2011 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Meeting with the Engine Manufacturers Association (EMA) FROM: Angela Cullen , Mechanical Engineer TO: Docket EPA
- HQ
- OAR
- 2010
- 0162 This memorandum documents a meeting held on March 24 , 2011 b etween EMA , DOT and EPA and included the following individuals: EMA: Tim Blubaugh, Andrea Brown , Dave Kayes, Dan Kieffer, Rich Mihelic , Josef Tarp, Peter Kinclafe, Brian Reed NHTSA/DOT: Coralie Cooper EPA: Cle Jackson, Zuimdie Guerra, Prashanth Gururaja, Julian Davis , Sam Waltzer, Arvon Mitcham , and Angela Cullen The discuss ion focused on reference test method for aerodyn amic determination and standardized trailers.
§ 35.102 Application. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, this part applies to all services, programs, and activities provided or made available by public entities.
( b ) To the extent that public transportation services, programs, and activities of public entities are covered by subtitle B of title II of the ADA (42 U.S.C. 12141), they are not subject to the requirements of this part.