alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employee Benefits Security Administration

          - [Application Number D-11638]

                    In the December 16, 2010 issue of the                     **Federal Register**                    , at 75 FR 78772, the Department of Labor published a notice of proposed exemption from the prohibited transaction restrictions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, and from certain taxes imposed by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The notice of proposed exemption, if granted, would have permitted the sale of certain shares in a hedge fund by the Owens & Minor, Inc. Pension Plan to the applicant.                

By e-mail dated February 8, 2011, the applicant requested that the application for exemption be withdrawn.

Accordingly, the notice of proposed exemption is hereby withdrawn.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 9th day of March 2011.

Ivan L. Strasfeld,

Director, Office of Exemption Determinations, Employee Benefits Security Administration.

[FR Doc. 2011-5913 Filed 3-14-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-29-P
### §17i. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, act May 26, 1930, ch. 324, §10, 46 Stat. 383, related to hire of work animals, vehicles and equipment with or without personal services; rates. See section 104904 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 911 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 911

 To require the installation of secondary cockpit barriers on existing 
                   aircraft, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 27, 2019

 Mr. Casey (for himself and Mr. Toomey) introduced the following bill; 
    which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the installation of secondary cockpit barriers on existing 
                   aircraft, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Saracini Enhanced Aviation Safety 
Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. INSTALLATION OF SECONDARY COCKPIT BARRIERS ON EXISTING 
              AIRCRAFT.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 18 months after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation 
Administration shall issue an order requiring installation of a 
secondary cockpit barrier on each covered aircraft.
    (b) Covered Aircraft.--In this section, the term ``covered 
aircraft'' means a commercial passenger aircraft operating under the 
provisions of part 121 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations.
                                 <all>
```
#### Thomas C. Kinirons, Appellant, v Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America, Also Known as TIAA, et al., Respondents.

[828 NYS2d 293]

*238Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane S. Solomon, J.), entered September 2, 2005, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court properly dismissed the Labor Law § 241 (6) claim. Plaintiff testified that the tools over which he tripped belonged to an electrician who was mounting conduit on a machine room wall. The tools, which, according to plaintiffs description, had been placed just to the right of the electrician, were positioned for and “consistent with” the work being performed and were not “scattered” within the meaning of Industrial Code (12 NYCRR) § 23-1.7 (e) (2) (see *Schroth v New York State Thruway Auth.,*300 AD2d 1044 [2002]). Plaintiffs reliance on subdivision (e) (1) of the same regulation is misplaced inasmuch as plaintiff was not injured in a “passageway” (see *id.).*

The motion court also properly dismissed the Labor Law § 200 and common-law negligence claims, since no triable issue of fact exists as to whether either defendant owner or defendant general contractor had supervision and control over the injury-producing work (see *Ross v Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Elec. Co.,*81 NY2d 494, 505 [1993]). We note as well the absence of evidence that either defendant had actual or constructive notice of the alleged hazardous condition.

We have considered plaintiffs’ remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Friedman, J.P, Marlow, Sullivan, Nardelli and Gonzalez, JJ.
# C_2010051EN.01004502.xml

| 27.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 51/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/45

---

Action brought on 5 January 2010 — De Lucia v OHIM — Galbani (De Lucia La natura pratica del gusto)

(Case T-2/10)

2010/C 51/83

Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Domenico De Lucia SpA (San Felice a Cancello, Italy) (represented by: S. Cutolo, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Egidio Galbani SpA (Melzo, Italy)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 October 2009 in Case R 37/2009-1. |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 October 2009 in Case R 37/2009-1.

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: De Lucia

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark composed of the word element ‘De Luca/La natura pratica del gusto’ (application for registration No 4 962 346) for goods in Classes 29, 30 and 31.

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Egidio Galbani SpA.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community word mark ‘LUCIA’ (No 620 716) for goods in Classes 29 and 30; Community figurative mark composed of the word element ‘Galbani-Santa Lucia’ (No 2 302 677) for goods in Class 29; national (Italian registration No 67 470) and international (No 256 299) figurative mark ‘LUCIA’ for goods in Class 29; national (Italian registration No 597 377), international (No 601 651) and Community (No 70 185) figurative mark ‘Santa Lucia’ for goods in Classes 29 and 30; national (Italian registration No 131 028) and international (No 256 299) word mark ‘Santa Lucia’ for goods in Class 29, and Community word mark ‘Santa Lucia’ (No 70 128) for goods in Classes 29 and 30.

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld in part insofar as concerns certain goods in Class 31.

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal granted insofar as concerns ‘tobacco’ (Class 31) and authorisation granted for the registration of this product.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Misapplication of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 and no and/or inadequate reasons given in relation to the request that Article 12(a) of the regulation be applied.

Pleas in law:

---
# C_2012227EN.01000502.xml

| 28.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 227/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 227/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 14 June 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation — France) — Auto 24 SARL v Jaguar Land Rover France SAS

(Case C-158/11) (1)

1

(Competition - Article 101 TFEU - Motor vehicle sector - Regulation (EC) No 1400/2002 - Block exemption - Selective distribution system - Concept of ‘specified criteria’ concerning a quantitative selective distribution system - Refusal to grant authorisation as a distributor of new motor vehicles - Lack of precise, objective, proportionate and non-discriminatory quantitative selection criteria)

2012/C 227/07

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Cour de cassation

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Auto 24 SARL

Applicant:

Defendant: Jaguar Land Rover France SAS

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Cour de Cassation (Court of Cassation) — Interpretation of Article 1(1)(f) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1400/2002 of 31 July 2002 on the application of Article 81(3) of the Treaty to vertical agreements and concerted practices in the motor vehicle sector (OJ 2002 L 203, p. 30) — Selective distribution system — Refusal to authorise as a distributor of new Land Rover vehicles — Concept of ‘specified criteria’ in the context of a quantitative selective distribution system — Lack of precise, objective, proportionate and non-discriminatory quantitative selection criteria

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The term ‘specified criteria’, referred to in Article 1(1)(f) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1400/2002 of 31 July 2002 on the application of Article 81(3) of the Treaty to categories of vertical agreements and concerted practices in the motor vehicle sector, means, with respect to a quantitative selective distribution system within the meaning of that regulation, criteria the precise content of which may be verified. In order to benefit from the exemption provided for by that regulation, it is not necessary for such a system to be based on criteria that are objectively justified and applied in a uniform and non-differentiated manner in respect of all applicants for authorisation.

---

(1)  OJ C 179, 18.6.2011.

1

---
CS 314937-C 03/16/2020 

cdc.gov/COVID19-ch

关于冠状病毒疾病 2019 (COVID-19) 

您需要知道什么

什么是冠状病毒疾病 2019 (COVID-19)?

冠状病毒疾病 2019 (COVID-19) 是一种呼吸道疾病,可

在人与人之间传播。引起 COVID-19 的病毒是一种新型

冠状病毒,在对中国武汉暴发的疫情进行调查时首次被

发现。

在美国,人们是否会患上 COVID-19?

是的。COVID-19 正在美国部分地区在人与人之间传播。

对于和已知患 COVID-19 的人有过密切接触的人员(例如

医护人员或家庭成员),COVID-19 感染的风险较高。其

他感染风险较高的人是居住在或最近去过 COVID-19持续

传播的地区的人员。

美国是否已经出现 COVID-19 的病例?

是。美国首例 COVID-19 报告于 2020 年 1 月 21 日。美国

COVID-19 病例的当前数量可参见美国疾病控制与预防中

心网页 https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/casesin-us.html。

COVID-19 是如何传播的?

引起 COVID-19 的病毒可能是从动物身上产生的,但现在

正在人与人之间传播。人们认为,这种病毒主要通过感染

者咳嗽或打喷嚏时产生的呼吸道飞沫从而在彼此密切接触

的人(约6英尺内)之间传播。人们也有可能通过触摸带

有病毒的表面或物体,然后触摸自己的嘴、鼻子或可能通

过触摸眼睛而感染 COVID-19,但这并不被认为是病毒的

主要传播方式。在https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-

ncov/about/transmission-chinese.html上了解有关新型冠

状病毒传播的知识。

COVID-19 有哪些症状?

COVID-19 的患者有轻度至重度的呼吸系统疾病伴以下

症状

• 发热

• 咳嗽

• 呼吸困难

该病毒有哪些严重并发症?

一些患者有双侧肺炎,可患多器官衰竭甚至在某些情况

下会死亡。

我该如何保护自己?

人们可以通过日常预防措施来保护自己免受呼吸道疾病

的侵害。

• 避免与患病的人近距离接触。

• 避免用未清洗过的手触碰眼睛、鼻子和嘴巴。

• 经常用肥皂和水洗手,每次至少20秒钟。如果没有肥

皂和水,可以使用酒精含量至少为 60% 的酒精类洗

手液。

如果您患病,为了避免将呼吸系统疾病传播给

他人,您应该

• 生病时待在家里。

• 咳嗽或打喷嚏时用纸巾遮住,然后将纸巾丢进垃

圾桶。

• 对频繁接触的物体和表面进行清洁和除菌。

如果我最近从持续传播 COVID-19 的地区旅行归

来怎么办?

如果您是从疫区旅行归来,则您的行动可能会受限制,

最长不超过2周。如果在此期间出现症状(发热、咳嗽、

呼吸困难),请就医。出发之前,请致电您的医务人员

的办公室,并告诉他们您的旅行情况和症状。他们将为

您提供有关如何获得诊疗,而又不会使其他人接触感染

的指导。生病时,避免与人接触,不要外出并延迟任何

旅行,以减少将疾病传播给他人的可能性。

是否有疫苗?

目前尚无疫苗可预防 COVID-19。预防感染的最佳方法是

采取日常预防措施,例如避免与生病的人密切接触并经

常洗手。

是否有治疗方法?

对于 COVID-19,没有特异性抗病毒的治疗方法。感染了

COVID-19 的患者可以寻求诊疗护理以缓解症状。
§ 1301.28 TVA review of request for correction or amendment of record. ( a ) TVA will acknowledge a request for amendment within 10 days of receipt. The acknowledgement will be in writing, will request any additional information TVA requires to determine whether to make the requested correction or amendment, and will indicate the date by which TVA expects to make its initial determination.
( b ) TVA will, except in unusual circumstances, complete its consideration of requests to amend records within 30 days. If more time is deemed necessary, TVA will notify the individual of the delay and of the expected date of completion of the review.
( c ) If TVA determines that a record should be corrected or amended, in whole or in part, in accordance with a request, it will advise the requesting individual in writing of its determination, and correct or amend the record accordingly. If an accounting of disclosures has been made, TVA will, to the extent of the accounting, inform prior recipients of the record of the fact that the correction was made and the substance of the correction.
( d ) If TVA, after initial consideration of a request, determines that a record should not be corrected or amended, in whole or in part, in accordance with a request, it will notify the individual in writing of its refusal to amend the record and the reasons therefor. The notification will inform the individual that the refusal may be appealed administratively and will advise the individual of the procedures for such appeals.
[40 FR 45313, Oct. 1, 1975. Redesignated at 44 FR 30682, May 29, 1979, and further redesignated at 82 FR 51757, Nov. 8, 2017]
# United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 February 24, 2006 Before Hon. RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge Hon. DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge Hon. ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge

SELEMAWIT F. GIDAY, ] Petition for Review of Petitioner, ] an Order of the Board of ] Immigration Appeals No. 04-1962 v. ] ] No. A95-395-594 ALBERTO R. GONZALES, ] Respondent. ] ]

IT IS ORDERED that respondent's motion for clarification is GRANTED
. The clerk shall amend page nine of the slip opinion by replacing the words "Department of Homeland Security" with the words "Department of Justice".
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT

A

Odessa |
16 miles |

Coffeepot Lake
Recreation Site =

Recreation Opportunities

UN (as fo CE) Gs ES

Horseback Boating Fishing
Picnicking Riding Hiking Canoeing

<—

Caretaker
Residence

——o{

Recreation
Camping
Picnic Area
Information
Boat Ramp
Parking

Restrooms

P)

No Hunting

LEGEND

Transportation

Access Route
Improved Road
Non-Motorized Trail

Other Road or Trail,
Access as Designated

Basalt
Rimroce!

Harrington
12 miles
—>

Approximate Scale

100 0 100
——_—-— ——

Feet

Administered Land

Bureau of Land
Management

BLM Game Reserve

Washington Dept. of
Natural Resources

Private or Other

0.25 0 0.25 0.5 0.75
N ECECeEt ——! ]
MILES
E 0.25 O 025 0.5 0.75
=e=—=! —! ]
KILOMETERS

U. S. Department of the Interior
Bureau of Land Management
Spokane District
1103 N. Fancher
Spokane, WA 99212
(509) 536-1200

It is unlawful to trespass on private lands. State hunting and fishing regulations
apply to private lands. Landowners are not required to post or fence their lands.
Check with private landowners before entering their property.
### SUBCHAPTER VI—SEQUOIA AND YOSEMITE NATIONAL PARKS

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### General Grant National Park Abolished

General Grant National Park was abolished and lands transferred to Kings Canyon National Park, see section 80a of this title.
#### § 12.23 Deficient registration statement.

A registration statement which is determined to be incomplete, inaccurate, misleading, or false, by the Chief Registration Unit, may be returned by him to the registrant as being unacceptable for filing under the terms of the act.

[21 FR 5928, Aug. 8, 1956, as amended by Order No. 524-73, 38 FR 18235, July 9, 1973]
Dismissed and Opinion Filed November 30, 2015 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-15-00941-CV JAYSON HOWARD MOORE, Appellant V. JAMILA VERNA BOYD, Appellee On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CV15-00331 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, and Ju stices Lang-Miers and Stoddart Opinion by Chief Justice Wright The filing fee and docketing statement in th is case are past due. By postcard dated August 6, 2015, we notified appellant the $195 fili ng fee was due. We directed appellant to remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in dismissal of the appeal. Also by po stcard dated August 6, 201 5, we notified appellant the docketing statement had not been filed in this case. We directed appellant to file the docketing statement within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so might result in dismissal of this appeal. To date, appellant ha s not paid the filing f ee, filed the docketing statement, or otherwise corres ponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal.–2– Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.3(b), (c).

150941F.P05 /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
JAYSON HOWARD MOORE, Appellant
No. 05-15-00941-CV V. JAMILA VERNA BOYD, Appellee On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CV15-00331. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Lang-Miers and Stoddart participating. In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED

. It is ORDERED that appellee JAMILA VERNA BOYD recover her costs of this appeal from appellant JAYS ON HOWARD MOORE.
Judgment entered November 30, 2015.
EXHIBIT 23.1







Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
   Gerber Scientific, Inc.:
We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements No. 2-93695, No. 33-58668, No. 333-26177, No. 333-42879, No. 333-81447, No. 333-83463, No. 333-39754, and No. 333-116991 on Form S-8 and No. 33-58670 on Form S-3 of Gerber Scientific, Inc. of our report dated July 13, 2004, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Gerber Scientific, Inc. and subsidiaries as of April 30, 2004 and 2003 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended April 30, 2004, which report appears in the April 30, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K of Gerber Scientific, Inc.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
July 13, 2004
0.511149999999997660
0.0
0.0
-0.511150000000016540
563167.24822659860
4469688.0498137763
### SUBCHAPTER IV—CONCESSIONS FOR ACCOMMODATIONS, FACILITIES, AND SERVICES IN AREAS ADMINISTERED BY NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
EXHIBIT 21.1


                    GLOBAL MARINE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                           AS OF FEBRUARY 28, 1998


                                       STATE OR OTHER       PERCENT OF VOTING
                                       JURISDICTION OF      STOCK OWNED BY
NAME OF COMPANY                        INCORPORATION        IMMEDIATE PARENT

Global Marine Inc.                         Delaware                   -
  Applied Drilling
    Technology Inc.                        Texas                    100%
  Arctic Systems Ltd.                      Canada                   100%
  Campeche Drilling Services Inc.          Delaware                 100%
  Challenger Minerals Inc.                 California               100%
  Global Marine Arctic Ltd.                Canada                   100%
  Global Marine Drilling Company           California               100%
    Global Dolphin Drilling Company        India                     40%
      Private Limited               
    Global Marine Caribbean, Inc.          California               100%
    Global Marine Development Inc.         California               100%
    Global Marine do Brasil 
      Perfuracoes Ltda.                    Brazil                    50%  (1)
  Global Marine Baltic Inc.                Delaware                 100%
    Global Marine International Services
      Corporation                          Bahamas                 89.3%  (2)
      Global Marine B.V.                   The Netherlands          100%
        Glomar International (Canada)      Nova Scotia              100%
           Drilling Company
      Global Marine North Sea Limited      Bahamas                  100%
      Global Marine Overseas Limited       Bahamas                  100%
           Global Marine West Africa       Bahamas                  100%
             Drilling Company Limited
      Global Marine South America LLC      Delaware                 100%
      Global Marine U.K. Limited           Scotland                 100%
      Global Offshore Drilling Ltd.        Nigeria                   60%
      Glomar International S.A.R.L.        France                   100%
  Global Marine Capital Investments Inc.   Delaware                 100%
    Global Marine Beaufort Sea Inc.        Delaware                 100%
  Global Marine Corporate Services Inc.    California               100%
  Global Marine de Venezuela Inc.          Delaware                 100%
  Global Marine Drilling (Malaysia)
    Sdn. Bhd.                              Malaysia                 100%
  Global Marine Integrated Services
    - International Inc.                   Delaware                 100%
  Intermarine Services Inc.                Texas                    100%
  Marican Offshore Drilling Services, Inc. Canada                   100%
  Turnkey Ventures de Mexico Inc.          Delaware                 100%

___________________________

(1) The remaining 50% of the voting stock is owned directly by Global Marine
    Inc.
(2) The remaining 10.7% of the voting stock is owned by Global Marine Drilling
    Company.




<PAGE>