alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 
 TO THE

 MOBILE MINI, INC. AMENDED AND RESTATED EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 

WHEREAS, Section 16.1 of the Mobile Mini, Inc. Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) authorizes the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Mobile Mini, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), to amend the Plan at any time; and 

WHEREAS, the Committee now finds it desirable and in the best interests of the Company to amend the Plan to impose a one year minimum
vesting period on all awards and clarify the Plan’s prohibition on repricing awards without shareholder approval. 
 NOW,
THEREFORE, the Plan is amended, effective as of March 11, 2016, as follows: 
 1. Section 3.4 is amended and restated to read as
follows: 
 3.4 Authority to Reprice. Except as provided in Section 4.2, the Company may not, without obtaining
shareholder approval: (a) amend or modify the terms of any outstanding Option or SAR to reduce the exercise price of such outstanding Option or SAR; (b) cancel, exchange or permit or accept the surrender of any outstanding Option or SAR in
exchange for an Option or SAR with an exercise price that is less than the exercise price of the original Option or SAR; or (c) cancel, exchange or permit or accept the surrender of any outstanding Option or SAR in exchange for any other Award,
cash or other securities for purposes of repricing such Option or SAR. 
 2. A new Section 4.3 is added as follows: 

4.3 Minimum Vesting. Except with respect to five percent (5%) of the maximum aggregate number of shares of Stock
that may be issued under the Plan, as provided in Section 4.1, no Award shall vest earlier than one year following the date of grant of such Award; provided, however, that such limitation shall not preclude the acceleration of vesting of such
Award upon the death, disability, involuntary termination of service of the Participant or in connection with a Change of Control, as determined by the Committee in its discretion. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized officers this 11th day of March, 2016. 
  

													
	ATTEST:	 	 	 	MOBILE MINI, INC.
							
	By:	 	 /s/ Shirley Pullen
	 		 		 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Christopher J. Miner

		 	Shirley Pullen	 		 		 		 		 	Christopher J. Miner
		 	Assistant Secretary	 		 		 		 		 	Secretary
### SUBCHAPTER XC—CUYAHOGA VALLEY NATIONAL PARK
# C_2011103EN.01001701.xml

| 2.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/17

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Finland) lodged on 2 February 2011 — Veronsaajien oikeudenvalvontayksikkö

(Case C-48/11)

2011/C 103/30

Language of the case: Finnish

Referring court

Referring court

Korkein hallinto-oikeus

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Veronsaajien oikeudenvalvontayksikkö

Applicant:

Defendant: A Oy

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Is an exchange of shares in which a Finnish limited company transfers to a Norwegian company (in the corporate form of an aksjeselskap [public limited company]) shares of a company which it owns and receives as consideration shares issued by the Norwegian company to be treated in taxation (taking account of Articles 31 and 40 of the EEA Agreement) neutrally in the same way as if the exchange of shares were between domestic companies or companies with their seat in Member States of the European Union?

---
### SUBCHAPTER LXXXVIII—GLEN CANYON NATIONAL RECREATION AREA
### §1727b. Indian Youth Service Corps

#### (a) In general

There is established within the Public Lands Corps a program to be known as the "Indian Youth Service Corps" that—

(1) enrolls participants between the ages of 16 and 30, inclusive, and veterans age 35 or younger, a majority of whom are Indians;

(2) is established pursuant to an agreement between an Indian tribe and a qualified youth or conservation corps for the benefit of the members of the Indian tribe; and

(3) carries out appropriate conservation projects on eligible service land.

#### (b) Authorization of cooperative agreements

The Secretary may enter into cooperative agreements with Indian tribes and qualified youth or conservation corps for the establishment and administration of the Indian Youth Service Corps.

#### (c) Guidelines

Not later than 18 months after March 12, 2019, the Secretary of the Interior, in consultation with Indian tribes, shall issue guidelines for the management of the Indian Youth Service Corps, in accordance with this subchapter and any other applicable Federal laws.

(Pub. L. 91–378, title II, §210, as added Pub. L. 116–9, title IX, §9003(g), Mar. 12, 2019, 133 Stat. 835.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subchapter, referred to in subsec. (c), was in the original "this Act", and was translated as reading "this title", meaning title II of Pub. L. 91–378, known as the Public Lands Corps Act of 1993, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 210 of Pub. L. 91–379 was renumbered section 212 and is classified to section 1729 of this title.
§ 591.1 Basic requirements. ( a ) All official plants must comply with the sanitation requirements contained in part 416 of this chapter, Sanitation, except as otherwise provided in this chapter.
( b ) All official plants must comply with the Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) Systems requirements contained in part 417 of this chapter, except as otherwise provided in this chapter.
( c ) For the purposes of this chapter, parts 416, Sanitation, 417, Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) Systems, and 500, Rules of Practice, an official establishment or establishment includes an official plant.
### §1310. Authorization of appropriations; maximum amount of payments pursuant to agreements

There are hereby authorized to be appropriated without fiscal year limitation, such sums as may be necessary to carry out the program authorized by this chapter. In carrying out the program, in each fiscal year through the fiscal year ending September 30, 1980, the Secretary shall not enter into agreements with owners and operators which would require payments to owners or operators in any calendar year under such agreements in excess of $10,000,000. In carrying out the program, in each fiscal year after the fiscal year ending September 30, 1980, the Secretary shall not enter into agreements with owners and operators which would require payments to owners or operators in any calendar year under such agreements in excess of $30,000,000. Not more than 15 percent of the funds authorized to be appropriated in any fiscal year after the fiscal year ending September 30, 1980, may be used for agreements entered into with owners or operators in any one State.

(Pub. L. 91–559, §11, Dec. 19, 1970, 84 Stat. 1471; Pub. L. 96–182, §4, Jan. 2, 1980, 93 Stat. 1317.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1980—Pub. L. 96–182 limited restrictions on Secretary's authority to enter into agreements in excess of $10,000,000 to each fiscal year through fiscal year ending Sept. 30, 1980, and inserted restrictions relating to agreements in excess of $30,000,000 for each fiscal year after fiscal year ending Sept. 30, 1980, and that not more than 15 percent of the funds authorized to be appropriated in any fiscal year after fiscal year ending Sept. 30, 1980, may be used for agreements entered into with owners or operators in any one State.
Open Meeting of the 

SEC Advisory Committee on Improvements to Financial Reporting 

Laurel Heights Conference Center, Sublevel 1 Auditorium 

University of California – San Francisco 

San Francisco, CA 

AGENDA 

Thursday March 13, 2008, Beginning at 3:00 P.M. Pacific Time 

I. Introductory Remarks – Robert Pozen, Committee Chairman 

II. Panel One – Restatements and Discussion of Developed Proposals 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3 

 Participants: 

Jack L. Acosta – Sumtotal Systems, Inc. 

Steven E. Bochner, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati LLP 

Manish Goyal – TIAA-CREF 

John J. Huber – Latham & Watkins LLP 

Steve Meisel – PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLP 

Elizabeth Mooney – The Capital Group Companies 

Barbara Roper – Consumer Federation of America 

III. Panel Two – Professional Judgment and Discussion of Developed Proposal 3.4 

Participants: 

Jonathan Chadwick – Cisco 

Randy Fletchall – Ernst and Young LLP 

Salvatore J. Graziano – Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP 

John J. Huber – Latham & Watkins LLP 

Dennis Johnson – CALPERS 

Scott Richardson – Barclay’s Global Investors 

Scott Taub – Financial Reporting Advisors 
Friday March 14, 2008, Beginning at 8:00 A.M. Pacific Time 

IV. Panel Three – XBRL and Discussion of Developed Proposal 4.1 

 Participants: 

Steven E. Bochner, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati 

Jeff M. Bodner, Intel Corporation 

Mark Bolgiano, XBRL US 

Randy G. Fletchall, Ernst & Young LLP 

Gregory P. Hanson, ADVENTRX Pharmaceuticals 

Christopher Montano, Gridstone Research 

John Turner, CoreFiling 

V. Review of Comments Letters Received 

VI. Reports from Subcommittees and Discussion: 

1. Scope 

2. Deliberations 

3. Working Hypotheses 

4. Current Status and Further Work 

5. Coordination with Other Subcommittees 

VII. Next Steps and Future Timetable 

VIII. Adjournment (expected no later than 11:00 am)
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Article Search 
-  Testimony of Deputy Inspector General Sheldon Shoemaker Before The U.S. House of Representatives Subcommittee On Government Operations and The Federal Workforce - March 9, 2023 

# Testimony of Deputy Inspector General Sheldon Shoemaker before the U.S. House of Representatives Subcommittee on Government Operations and the Federal Workforce - March 9, 2023  

March 9, 2023

On March 9, 2023, Deputy Inspector General Shoemaker provided testimony before the House Subcommittee on Government Operations and the Federal Workforce. 

**Related programs:**

            Download .PDF
Exhibit No. 99.1



Supplemental Segment Information

|In thousands                       | Three Months Ended
April 30, | Year Ended 
April 30,
|---------------------------------- | ---------------------------- | ---------------------
|                                   | 2006                         | 2005                 
|Orders Received:                   |                              |                      
|Sign Making and Specialty Graphics | $  73,466                    | $  71,207            
|Apparel and Flexible Materials     | 49,481                       | 45,780               
|Ophthalmic Lens Processing         | 18,578                       | 19,100               
|                                   | $141,525                     | $136,087             
|                                   | ======                       | ======               







|                                   | April 30,2006 | April 30,2005 | 
|---------------------------------- | ------------- | ------------- | 
|Backlog:                           |               |               | 
|Sign Making and Specialty Graphics | $  2,699      | $  1,223      | 
|Apparel and Flexible Materials     | 40,514        | 38,443        | 
|Ophthalmic Lens Processing         | 357           | 3,943         | 
|                                   | $43,570       | $43,609       | 
|                                   | =====         | =====         |
### SUBCHAPTER XXIV—GRAND CANYON NATIONAL PARK
#### § 2.3 Same: Narcotic Addict Rehabilitation Act.

A Federal prisoner committed under the Narcotic Addict Rehabilitation Act may be released on parole in the discretion of the Commission after completion of at least six months in treatment, not including any period of time for “study” prior to final judgment of the court. Before parole is ordered by the Commission, the Surgeon General or his designated representative must certify that the prisoner has made sufficient progress to warrant his release and the Attorney General or his designated representative must also report to the Commission whether the prisoner should be released. Recertification by the Surgeon General prior to reparole consideration is not required (18 U.S.C. 4254).

[48 FR 22918, May 23, 1983]
### §77zzz. Effect on existing law

Except as otherwise expressly provided, nothing in this subchapter shall affect (1) the jurisdiction of the Commission under the Securities Act of 1933 [15 U.S.C. 77a et seq.] or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.] over any person, security, or contract, or (2) the rights, obligations, duties, or liabilities of any person under such acts; nor shall anything in this subchapter affect the jurisdiction of any other commission, board, agency, or officer of the United States or of any State or political subdivision of any State, over any person or security, insofar as such jurisdiction does not conflict with any provision of this subchapter or any rule, regulation, or order thereunder.

(May 27, 1933, ch. 38, title III, §326, as added Aug. 3, 1939, ch. 411, 53 Stat. 1177; amended Pub. L. 111–203, title IX, §986(b)(6), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 1936.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Securities Act of 1933, referred to in text, is act May 27, 1933, ch. 38, title I, 48 Stat. 74, which is classified generally to subchapter I (§77a et seq.) of this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 77a of this title and Tables.

The Securities Exchange Act of 1934, referred to in text, is act June 6, 1934, ch. 404, 48 Stat. 881, which is classified principally to chapter 2B (§78a et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 78a of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

2010—Pub. L. 111–203 substituted "Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934" for "Securities Act of 1933, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935,".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2010 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 111–203 effective 1 day after July 21, 2010, except as otherwise provided, see section 4 of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as an Effective Date note under section 5301 of Title 12, Banks and Banking.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of Securities and Exchange Commission, with certain exceptions, to Chairman of such Commission, see Reorg. Plan No. 10 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3175, 64 Stat. 1265, set out under section 78d of this title.
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N NO. 03-11-00112- CV In re P rakashan and S araswati ORI GINAL P ROCEEDI NG F ROM H AY S CO UNTY M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Petitioner Prakasha

nand Saraswati has filed an ag ree d motion to dismiss his petition for writ of mandamus as a result of settlement. We g rant the motion and dismiss this proc eeding . See Tex. R. App. P . 42.1(a) (1), 52.8.

__________________________________________ Melissa Goodwin, Jus tice Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Henson a nd Goodwin Dismissed on Ag ree d Motion Filed: Mar ch 16, 2011
#### Citizens Bank *v.*Williams, treasurer.

Lumpkin, J.

1. An application for the writ of mandamus alleged, that a county treasurer had issued a check on a bank, payable to the order of a named person, for a stated amount; that the payee indorsed it, and another bank paid it in the ordinary course of business; that the paying bank had no notice that it was not a good and binding cheek *313of the county, and relied on the fact that it was the treasurer’s check in buying- it; that the bank on which it was drawn refused payment, and the treasurer also refused to pay the amount of the check, although he had in his bonds a sufficient amount of the funds of the county to do so. *Held,*that such application alleged no facts sufficient to show that the county funds were liable for the payment of the check so issued, or that it was the duty of the treasurer to pay it therefrom; and the application was properly dismissed on demurrer.

April 13, 1910.

Petition for mandamus. Before Judge Littlejohn. Sumter superior court.

June 22, 1909.

*Shipp & Sheppard,*for plaintiff. *J. A. Tlixon,*for defendant.

2. A county treasurer has no authority to liquidate claims against a county. The decisions in *Neal Loan*& *Banking Co.*v. *Chastain,*121 *Ga. 500*(49 S. E. 618), and *Shannon*v. *Reynolds,*78 *Ga.*760 (3 S. E. 653), relating to county warrants duly issued, do not apply to the present case. *Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
# C_2012138EN.01003906.xml

| 12.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/39

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 12 May 2011 — Stratakis v Commission

(Case F-37/10) (1)

(2012/C 138/96)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 246, 11.9.2010, p. 41.

---
When something is going on with your 

child, it can be hard to get the full picture. 

Your student assistance professional is 

there to help you develop one.

Student assistance professionals are there to provide the support 

you need. They will work with you, your child, and your child’s 

teachers to develop a complete picture of what’s going on and 

engage resources to help.

www.underagedrinking.samhsa.gov

#TalkTheyHearYou PEP20-03-01-073
### SUBCHAPTER CXLI—SAN RAFAEL SWELL RECREATION AREA
### SUBCHAPTER II—SUBSISTENCE MANAGEMENT AND USE
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7764

JAMES B. CURRY,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT; SCOTT S. HARRIS, Clerk of Court for 

Supreme Court of the United States,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. 

Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:16-cv-02733-JFA)

Submitted: April 25, 2017 Decided: May 3, 2017

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James B. Curry, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

James B. Curry appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of 

the magistrate judge and dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six 

Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). In its order, 

the district court stated that Curry had filed no objections to the report and 

recommendation despite having been warned of the consequences of failing to object. 

On appeal, Curry claims that he did not receive the report and recommendation, and he 

provides documentary support for his claim.

A party who fails to object in writing to a magistrate judge’s proposed findings of 

fact and conclusions of law is not entitled to de novo review of the magistrate judge’s 

determinations and is barred from contesting those determinations on appeal. Wright v. 

Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985). The waiver is a result of procedural 

default and does not affect jurisdiction. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 154 (1985). When 

a litigant is proceeding pro se, he must be given fair notice of the consequences of failing 

to object before a procedural default will apply. Wright, 766 F.2d at 845-46.

From the record presented, we cannot conclusively determine whether Curry 

received a copy of the report and recommendation. Accordingly, we vacate the decision 

of the district court and remand for the district court to make this determination in the 

first instance. Should the district court find Curry’s claim to be credible, it should 

provide him with a copy of the report and recommendation and afford him an opportunity 

to object. If, however, the court finds that Curry did receive the report and 

recommendation, it may reenter its original order, with any necessary modifications.
3

We deny Curry’s motions for default judgment and to “expedite service.” We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

VACATED AND REMANDED
UNITED
STATES


SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington,
D.C. 20549





FORM
8-K





CURRENT
REPORT


Pursuant
to Section 13 OR 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of
Report (Date of earliest event reported) March 15, 2010





Progenics
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.


(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Delaware
            
            000-23143
            
            13-3379479(State
      or other jurisdiction
              of
      incorporation)
            
            (Commission
              File
      Number)
            
            (IRS
      Employer
              Identification
      No.)777
      Old Saw Mill River Road, Tarrytown, New York
            
            10591(Address
      of principal executive offices)
            
            (Zip
      Code)Registrant's
      telephone number, including area code (914)
      789-2800





Check the
appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously
satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following
provisions (seeGeneral
Instruction A.2. below):








oWritten communications
pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





oSoliciting material
pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)




oPre-commencement
communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))




oPre-commencement
communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))







Item
2.02.           Results
of Operations and Financial Condition.




Progenics
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Nasdaq: PGNX) today announced its operational results for
the quarter and year ended December 31, 2009.  A copy of its press
release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1.




The
information furnished pursuant to Item 2.02 in this Form 8-K shall not be deemed
to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section, unless we specifically
incorporate it by reference in a document filed under the Exchange Act or the
Securities Act of 1933. We undertake no duty or obligation to publicly update or
revise the information so furnished.




Item
9.01.          Financial Statements and
Exhibits.





(d)
Exhibits





Exhibit
No.          Description





99.1                      Press
Release dated March 15, 2010.








SIGNATURES








Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto
duly authorized.








PROGENICS
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.


By:/s/ ROBERT A.
MCKINNEY


Robert A.
McKinney


Chief Financial
Officer, Senior Vice President,


Finance &
Operations and Treasurer











Date:
March 15, 2010