Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 60 / Monday, March 30, 2015 / Notices 16675 

discussions on revising the second draft 

of the working group’s 

recommendations to the NDWAC on 

potential changes to the Lead and 

Copper Rule. 

DATES: The meeting on April 23, 2015, 

will be held from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., 

eastern time, and on April 24, 2015, 

from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m., eastern 

time. 

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at 

the Cadmus Group Inc., 1555 Wilson 

Blvd., Suite 300, Arlington, VA, and 

will be open to the public. All attendees 

must sign in with the security desk and 

show photo identification to enter the 

building. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

more information about this meeting or 

to request written materials contact 

Lameka Smith, Standards and Risk 

Management Division, Office of Ground 

Water and Drinking Water, EPA; by 

phone at (202) 564–1629 or by email at 

LCRWorkingGroup@epa.gov. For 

additional information about the Lead 

and Copper Rule, please visit: http://

water.epa.gov/lawsregs/rulesregs/sdwa/

lcr/index.cfm. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Details about Participating in the 

Meeting: Members of the public who 

would like to register for this meeting 

should contact Lameka Smith by April 

22, 2015, by email at 

LCRWorkingGroup@epa.gov or by 

phone at 202–564–1629. The LCRWG 

will allocate 15 minutes for the public’s 

input at the meeting on April 23rd and 

15 minutes on April 24th. Each oral 

statement will be limited to five minutes 

at the meeting. It is preferred that only 

one person present a statement on 

behalf of a group or organization. To 

ensure adequate time for public 

involvement, individuals or 

organizations interested in presenting 

an oral statement should notify Lameka 

Smith no later than April 21, 2015. Any 

person who wishes to file a written 

statement can do so before or after the 

LCRWG meeting. Written statements 

intended for the meeting must be 

received by April 20, 2015, to be 

distributed to all members of the 

working group before the meeting. Any 

statements received on or after the date 

specified will become part of the 

permanent file for the meeting and will 

be forwarded to the LCRWG members 

for their information. 

Special Accommodations: For 

information on access or to request 

special accommodations for individuals 

with disabilities please contact Lameka 

Smith at (202) 564–1629 or by email at 

LCRWorkingGroup@epa.gov at least 10 

days prior to the meeting to give the 

EPA as much time as possible to process 

your request. 

Dated: March 19, 2015. 

Peter Grevatt, 

Director, Office of Ground Water and Drinking 

Water. 

[FR Doc. 2015–07112 Filed 3–27–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0057; FRL–9922–79] 

Registration Review; Pesticide 

Dockets Opened for Review and 

Comment 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: With this document, EPA is 

opening the public comment period for 

several registration reviews. Registration 

review is EPA’s periodic review of 

pesticide registrations to ensure that 

each pesticide continues to satisfy the 

statutory standard for registration, that 

is, the pesticide can perform its 

intended function without unreasonable 

adverse effects on human health or the 

environment. Registration review 

dockets contain information that will 

assist the public in understanding the 

types of information and issues that the 

Agency may consider during the course 

of registration reviews. Through this 

program, EPA is ensuring that each 

pesticide’s registration is based on 

current scientific and other knowledge, 

including its effects on human health 

and the environment. This document 

also announces the Agency’s intent to 

close the registration review case for 

tebufenpyrad, imazamethabenz, and 2- 

((hydroxymethyl)-amino)ethanol (also 

known as HMAE). These pesticides do 

not currently have any actively 

registered pesticide products and, 

therefore, the Agency is closing the 

registration review cases for 

tebufenpyrad, imazamethabenz, and 

HMAE. 

For phenmedipham, EPA is seeking 

comment on the preliminary work plan, 

the ecological problem formulation, and 

the human health draft risk assessment. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before May 29, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments 

identified by the docket identification 

(ID) number for the specific pesticide of 

interest provided in the table in Unit 

III.A., by one of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Do not submit electronically any 

information you consider to be 

Confidential Business Information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. 

• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental 

Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/ 

DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. 

NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001. 

• Hand Delivery: To make special 

arrangements for hand delivery or 

delivery of boxed information, please 

follow the instructions at http://

www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html. 

Additional instructions on 

commenting or visiting the docket, 

along with more information about 

dockets generally, is available at http:// 

www.epa.gov/dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

For pesticide specific information, 

contact: The Chemical Review 

Manager for the pesticide of interest 

identified in the table in Unit III.A. 

For general information contact: 

Richard Dumas, Pesticide ReEvaluation Division (7508P), Office of 

Pesticide Programs, Environmental 

Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania 

Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460– 

0001; telephone number: (703) 308– 

8015; fax number: (703) 308–8005; 

email address: dumas.richard@

epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. Does this action apply to me? 

This action is directed to the public 

in general, and may be of interest to a 

wide range of stakeholders including 

environmental, human health, 

farmworker, and agricultural advocates; 

the chemical industry; pesticide users; 

and members of the public interested in 

the sale, distribution, or use of 

pesticides. Since others also may be 

interested, the Agency has not 

attempted to describe all the specific 

entities that may be affected by this 

action. 

B. What should I consider as I prepare 

my comments for EPA? 

1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this 

information to EPA through 

regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark 

the part or all of the information that 

you claim to be CBI. For CBI 

information in a disk or CD–ROM that 

you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the 

disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then 

identify electronically within the disk or 

CD–ROM the specific information that 

is claimed as CBI. In addition to one 

complete version of the comment that 

includes information claimed as CBI, a 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

16676 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 60 / Monday, March 30, 2015 / Notices 

copy of the comment that does not 

contain the information claimed as CBI 

must be submitted for inclusion in the 

public docket. Information so marked 

will not be disclosed except in 

accordance with procedures set forth in 

40 CFR part 2. 

2. Tips for preparing your comments. 

When preparing and submitting your 

comments, see the commenting tips at 

http://www.epa.gov/dockets/

comments.html. 

3. Environmental justice. EPA seeks to 

achieve environmental justice, the fair 

treatment and meaningful involvement 

of any group, including minority and/or 

low income populations, in the 

development, implementation, and 

enforcement of environmental laws, 

regulations, and policies. To help 

address potential environmental justice 

issues, the Agency seeks information on 

any groups or segments of the 

population who, as a result of their 

location, cultural practices, or other 

factors, may have atypical or 

disproportionately high and adverse 

human health impacts or environmental 

effects from exposure to the pesticides 

discussed in this document, compared 

to the general population. 

II. Authority 

EPA is initiating its reviews of the 

pesticides identified in this document 

pursuant to section 3(g) of the Federal 

Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide 

Act (FIFRA) (7 U.S.C. 136a(g)) and the 

Procedural Regulations for Registration 

Review at 40 CFR part 155, subpart C. 

Section 3(g) of FIFRA provides, among 

other things, that the registrations of 

pesticides are to be reviewed every 15 

years. Under FIFRA, a pesticide product 

may be registered or remain registered 

only if it meets the statutory standard 

for registration given in FIFRA section 

3(c)(5) (7 U.S.C. 136a(c)(5)). When used 

in accordance with widespread and 

commonly recognized practice, the 

pesticide product must perform its 

intended function without unreasonable 

adverse effects on the environment; that 

is, without any unreasonable risk to 

man or the environment, or a human 

dietary risk from residues that result 

from the use of a pesticide in or on food. 

III. Registration Reviews 

A. What action is the Agency taking? 

As directed by FIFRA section 3(g), 

EPA is reviewing the pesticide 

registrations identified in the table in 

this unit to assure that they continue to 

satisfy the FIFRA standard for 

registration—that is, they can still be 

used without unreasonable adverse 

effects on human health or the 

environment. A pesticide’s registration 

review begins when the Agency 

establishes a docket for the pesticide’s 

registration review case and opens the 

docket for public review and comment. 

At present, EPA is opening registration 

review dockets for the cases identified 

in the following table. 

TABLE 1—REGISTRATION REVIEW DOCKETS OPENING

Registration review case name and No. Pesticide docket ID No. Chemical review manager, telephone number, email address 

Bioban P-1487 (Case 3028) ........................... EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0802 SanYvette Williams, 703–305–7702, williams.sanyvette@epa.gov. 

Bis(bromoacetoxy)-2-butene (BBAB) (Case 

3030).

EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0799 Tina Pham, 703–308–0125, pham.thao@epa.gov. 

Carboxin and Oxycarboxin (Case 0012) ........ EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0144 Dana L. Friedman, 703–347–8827, friedman.dana@epa.gov. 

Copper HDO (Case 5106) .............................. EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0800 Donna Kamarei, 703–347–0443, kamarei.donna@epa.gov. 

Chondrostereum Purpureum (Case 6091) ..... EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0051 Kathleen Martin, 703–308–2857, kathleen.martin@epa.gov. 

Creosote (Case 0139) .................................... EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0823 Sandra O’Neill, 703–347–0141, oneill.sandra@epa.gov. 

Cyazofamid (Case 7656) ................................ EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0128 Jose Gayoso, 703–347–8652, gayoso.jose@epa.gov. 

Famoxadone (Case 7038) .............................. EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0094 Christina Scheltema, 703–308–2201, scheltema.christina@

epa.gov. 

Lufenuron (Case 7627) ................................... EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0098 Bonnie Adler, 703–308–8523, adler.bonnie@epa.gov. 

Myclobutanil (Case 7006) ............................... EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0053 Benjamin Askin, 703–347–0503, askin.benjamin@epa.gov. 

Novaluron (Case 7615) ................................... EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0171 Margaret Hathaway, 703–305–5076, hathaway.margaret@

epa.gov. 

Phenmedipham (Case 0277) .......................... EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0546 Miguel Zavala, 703–347–0504, zavala.miguel@epa.gov. 

Sethoxydim (Case 2600) ................................ EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0088 James Parker, 703–306–0469, parker.james@epa.gov. 

Spirodiclofen (Case 7443) .............................. EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0262 Julia Stokes, 703–347–8966, stokes.julia@epa.gov. 

Spiromesifen (Case 7442) .............................. EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0263 Julia Stokes, 703–347–8966, stokes.julia@epa.gov. 

For phenmedipham (Case 0277) EPA 

is seeking comment on the preliminary 

Work Plan, the ecological problem 

formulation, and the human health draft 

risk. For Forchlorfenuron (Case 7057), 

EPA is seeking comment on the 

Combined Work Plan, Summary 

Document, and Proposed Interim 

Registration Review Decision, which 

includes the human health and 

ecological risk assessments. The Agency 

also is announcing the intent to close 

the registration review cases for 

tebufenpyrad, imazamethabenz, and 2- 

(hydroxymethyl)- amino)ethanol also 

known as HMAE. These pesticides do 

not currently have any actively 

registered pesticide products and, 

therefore, the Agency is closing the 

registration review cases for 

tebufenpyrad, imazamethabenz, and 

HMAE. The tebufenpyrad registration 

review case is being closed because the 

last products were canceled in the 

Federal Register notice dated 

September 24, 2014 (79 FR 57087) 

(FRL–9916–69). The ‘‘Notice of 

Registration Review Case Closure’’ for 

tebufenpyrad is available in docket 

EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0218 at http://

www.regulations.gov. For 

phenmedipham (Case 0277), EPA is 

seeking comment on the preliminary 

work plan, the ecological problem 

formulation, and the human health draft 

risk assessment. The imazamethabenz 

registration review case is being closed 

because the last products were canceled 

in the Federal Register. The ‘‘Notice of 

Registration Review Case Closure’’ for 

imazamethabenz is available in docket 

EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0394 at http://

www.regulations.gov. 

B. Docket Content 

1. Review dockets. The registration 

review dockets contain information that 

the Agency may consider in the course 

of the registration review. The Agency 

may include information from its files 

including, but not limited to, the 

following information: 

• An overview of the registration 

review case status. 

• A list of current product 

registrations and registrants. 

• Federal Register notices regarding 

any pending registration actions. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 60 / Monday, March 30, 2015 / Notices 16677 

• Federal Register notices regarding 

current or pending tolerances. 

• Risk assessments. 

• Bibliographies concerning current 

registrations. 

• Summaries of incident data. 

• Any other pertinent data or 

information. 

Each docket contains a document 

summarizing what the Agency currently 

knows about the pesticide case and a 

preliminary work plan for anticipated 

data and assessment needs. Additional 

documents provide more detailed 

information. During this public 

comment period, the Agency is asking 

that interested persons identify any 

additional information they believe the 

Agency should consider during the 

registration reviews of these pesticides. 

The Agency identifies in each docket 

the areas where public comment is 

specifically requested, though comment 

in any area is welcome. 

2. Other related information. More 

information on these cases, including 

the active ingredients for each case, may 

be located in the registration review 

schedule on the Agency’s Web site at 

http://www2.epa.gov/pesticidereevaluation. Information on the 

Agency’s registration review program 

and its implementing regulation may be 

seen at http://www2.epa.gov/pesticidereevaluation/registration-reviewschedules. 

3. Information submission 

requirements. Anyone may submit data 

or information in response to this 

document. To be considered during a 

pesticide’s registration review, the 

submitted data or information must 

meet the following requirements: 

• To ensure that EPA will consider 

data or information submitted, 

interested persons must submit the data 

or information during the comment 

period. The Agency may, at its 

discretion, consider data or information 

submitted at a later date. 

• The data or information submitted 

must be presented in a legible and 

useable form. For example, an English 

translation must accompany any 

material that is not in English and a 

written transcript must accompany any 

information submitted as an 

audiographic or videographic record. 

Written material may be submitted in 

paper or electronic form. 

• Submitters must clearly identify the 

source of any submitted data or 

information. 

• Submitters may request the Agency 

to reconsider data or information that 

the Agency rejected in a previous 

review. However, submitters must 

explain why they believe the Agency 

should reconsider the data or 

information in the pesticide’s 

registration review. 

As provided in 40 CFR 155.58, the 

registration review docket for each 

pesticide case will remain publicly 

accessible through the duration of the 

registration review process; that is, until 

all actions required in the final decision 

on the registration review case have 

been completed. 

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq. 

Dated: March 18, 2015. 

Richard P. Keigwin, Jr., 

Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division, 

Office of Pesticide Programs. 

[FR Doc. 2015–07200 Filed 3–27–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

[3060–0207] 

Information Collection Being 

Submitted for Review and Approval to 

the Office of Management and Budget 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice and request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: As part of its continuing effort 

to reduce paperwork burdens, and as 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501– 

3520), the Federal Communications 

Commission (FCC or the Commission) 

invites the general public and other 

Federal agencies to take this 

opportunity to comment on the 

following information collection. 

Comments are requested concerning: 

Whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

Commission, including whether the 

information shall have practical utility; 

the accuracy of the Commission’s 

burden estimate; ways to enhance the 

quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information collected; ways to minimize 

the burden of the collection of 

information on the respondents, 

including the use of automated 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology; and ways to 

further reduce the information 

collection burden on small business 

concerns with fewer than 25 employees. 

The FCC may not conduct or sponsor a 

collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid control 

number. No person shall be subject to 

any penalty for failing to comply with 

a collection of information subject to the 

PRA that does not display a valid Office 

of Management and Budget (OMB) 

control number. 

DATES: Written PRA comments should 

be submitted on or before April 29, 

2015. If you anticipate that you will be 

submitting comments, but find it 

difficult to do so within the period of 

time allowed by this notice, you should 

advise the contact listed below as soon 

as possible. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your PRA comments 

to Nicholas A. Fraser, Office of 

Management and Budget, via fax at 202– 

395–5167 or via Internet at Nicholas_

A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov and to Benish 

Shah, Federal Communications 

Commission, via the Internet at 

Benish.Shah@fcc.gov. To submit your 

PRA comments by email send them to: 

PRA@fcc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Benish Shah, Office of Managing 

Director, (202) 418–7866. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

OMB Control Number: 3060–0207. 

Title: Part 11—Emergency Alert 

System (EAS). 

Form Number: Not applicable. 

Type of Review: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Respondents: Businesses or other forprofit; not-for-profit institutions; and 

state, local or tribal governments. 

Number of Respondents and 

Responses: 3,569,028 respondents; 

3,569,028 responses. 

Estimated Time per Response: 

.0229776 hours. 

Frequency of Response: On occasion 

reporting requirement and 

recordkeeping requirement. 

Obligation to Respond: Voluntary 

response for business or other for-profit 

and not-for-respondents. Mandatory 

response for state, local or tribal 

governments. Statutory authority for 

this information collection is contained 

in 47 U.S.C. sections 154(i) and 606 of 

the Communications Act of 1934, as 

amended. 

Total Annual Burden: 82,008 hours. 

Total Annual Cost: N/A. 

Privacy Act Impact Assessment: N/A. 

Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: 

There is no need for confidentiality. 

Needs and Uses: The Commission 

seeking an extension of this information 

collection in order to obtain the full 

three year approval from OMB. There 

are no changes in any of the reporting 

and/or recordkeeping requirements. 

There is no change to the Commission’s 

previous burden estimated. 

The Commission established a 

voluntary electronic method of 

complying with the reporting that EAS 

participants must complete as part of 

the national EAS test. This electronic 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES