alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 115.121 Evidence protocol and forensic medical examinations. ( a ) To the extent the agency is responsible for investigating allegations of sexual abuse in its lockups, the agency shall follow a uniform evidence protocol that maximizes the potential for obtaining usable physical evidence for administrative proceedings and criminal prosecutions.
( b ) The protocol shall be developmentally appropriate for youth where applicable, and, as appropriate, shall be adapted from or otherwise based on the most recent edition of the U.S. Department of Justice's Office on Violence Against Women publication, “A National Protocol for Sexual Assault Medical Forensic Examinations, Adults/Adolescents,” or similarly comprehensive and authoritative protocols developed after 2011. As part of the training required in § 115.131, employees and volunteers who may have contact with lockup detainees shall receive basic training regarding how to detect and respond to victims of sexual abuse.
( c ) The agency shall offer all victims of sexual abuse access to forensic medical examinations whether on-site or at an outside facility, without financial cost, where evidentiarily or medically appropriate. Such examinations shall be performed by Sexual Assault Forensic Examiners (SAFEs) or Sexual Assault Nurse Examiners (SANEs) where possible. If SAFEs or SANEs cannot be made available, the examination can be performed by other qualified medical practitioners. The agency shall document its efforts to provide SAFEs or SANEs.
( d ) If the detainee is transported for a forensic examination to an outside hospital that offers victim advocacy services, the detainee shall be permitted to use such services to the extent available, consistent with security needs.
( e ) To the extent the agency itself is not responsible for investigating allegations of sexual abuse, the agency shall request that the investigating agency follow the requirements of paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section.
( f ) The requirements in paragraphs (a) through (e) of this section shall also apply to: ( 1 ) Any State entity outside of the agency that is responsible for investigating allegations of sexual abuse in lockups; and
( 2 ) Any Department of Justice component that is responsible for investigating allegations of sexual abuse in lockups.
### §715f. Forfeiture of contraband oil shipped in violation of law; procedure

#### (a) Seizure procedure; return of contraband oil

Contraband oil shipped or transported in interstate commerce in violation of the provisions of this chapter shall be liable to be proceeded against in any district court of the United States within the jurisdiction of which the same may be found, and seized for forfeiture to the United States by a process of libel for condemnation; but in any such case the court may in its discretion, and under such terms and conditions as it shall prescribe, order the return of such contraband oil to the owner thereof where undue hardship would result from such forfeiture. The proceedings in such cases shall conform as nearly as may be to proceedings in rem in admiralty, except that either party may demand a trial by jury of any issue of fact joined in any such case, and all such proceedings shall be at the suit of and in the name of the United States. Contraband oil forfeited to the United States as provided in this section shall be used or disposed of pursuant to such rules and regulations as the President shall prescribe.

#### (b) Certificates of clearance

No such forfeiture shall be made in the case of contraband oil owned by any person (other than a person shipping such contraband oil in violation of the provisions of this chapter) who has with respect to such contraband oil a certificate of clearance which on its face appears to be valid and to have been issued by a board created under authority of section 715d of this title, certifying that the shipment in question is not contraband oil, and such person had no reasonable ground for believing such certificate to be invalid or to have been issued as a result of fraud or misrepresentation of fact.

(Feb. 22, 1935, ch. 18, §7, 49 Stat. 32.)
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report of GoAmerica, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended  September 30, 2007 filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),  I, Donald G. Barnhart,  Chief Financial
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects,  the consolidated  financial  condition of the Company as of the dates
presented and consolidated  results of operations of the Company for the periods
presented.

Dated: November 14, 2007

                                        /s/ Donald G. Barnhart
                                      ---------------------------
                                       Donald G. Barnhart
                                       Chief Financial Officer

This  certification  has been  furnished  solely  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


                                      026-
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of Reservation Proclamation.

# SUMMARY:

This notice informs the public that the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs proclaimed approximately 40 acres, more or less, to be added to the Bay Mills Indian Reservation for the Bay Mills Indian Community of Michigan.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ben Burshia, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Division of Real Estate Services, Mail Stop 4639-MIB, 1849 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20240, telephone (202) 208-7737.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This Notice is published in the exercise of authority delegated by the Secretary of the Interior to the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs by part 209 of the Departmental Manual.

A proclamation was issued according with Section 7 of the Act of June 18, 1934 (48 Stat. 986; 25 U.S.C. 467), for the land described below. The land was proclaimed to be an addition to the Bay Mills Indian Reservation and part of the Bay Mills Indian Community of Michigan for the exclusive use of Indians on that Reservation who are entitled to reside at the Reservation by enrollment or tribal membership.

                    Bay Mills Indian Community Reservation, Golf Course Acquisition, Michigan Meridan, Superior Township, Chippewa County, Michigan. Southeast One Quarter (SE                     1/4                    ) of the Northwest One Quarter (NW                     1/4                    ) of Section 6, Township 46 North, Range 2 West, Michigan (40 acres).                

The above-described lands contain a total of 40 acres, more or less, which are subject to all valid rights, reservations, rights-of-way, and easements of record.

This proclamation does not affect title to the land described above, nor does it affect any valid existing easements for public roads and highways, public utilities and for railroads and pipelines and any other rights-of-way or reservations of record.

Larry Echo Hawk,

Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.

[FR Doc. 2011-616 Filed 1-12-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-W7-P
Exhibit 10.26



Description of Management Incentive Plan
----------------------------------------

Purpose: The Management Incentive Plan is designed to provide attractive and
competitive financial rewards when solid results are achieved. Incentives are
used to reward managers for continuous improvements in operating and financial
results and for growing the business in a profitable way. The plan allows
flexibility for rewarding individual performance.

The Company's Management Incentive Plan provided target annual incentive awards
for Fiscal 2004 contingent upon the attainment of the following performance
goals: sales; profitability; cash flow; and the executive's individual
performance objectives. With respect to Corporate Staff executives, 30% of the
incentive was based on the attainment of a net income goal, 30% on a free cash
flow goal and 40% on achieving individual performance goals. With respect to
operating unit executives, 25% of the incentive was based on the attainment of
sales goals, 25% on the attainment of operating income goals, 25% on the
attainment of operating cash flow goals and 25% on achieving individual
performance goals.
#### §§ 31.200-31.202 [Reserved]
###### Editorial Note on Part 0

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 0 appear at 73 FR 73 FR 54947, Sept. 24, 2008.

#### § 0.57 Criminal prosecutions against juveniles.

The Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Criminal Division and his Deputy Assistant Attorneys General are each authorized to exercise the power and authority vested in the Attorney General by sections 5032 and 5036 of title 18, United States Code, relating to criminal proceedings against juveniles. The Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Criminal Division is authorized to redelegate any function delegated to him under this section to United States Attorneys and to the Chief of the Section within the Criminal Division which supervises the implementation of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (18 U.S.C. 5031 *et seq.*).

[Order No. 579-74, 39 FR 37771, Oct. 24, 1974, as amended by Order No. 894-80, 45 FR 34269, May 22, 1980]
Fort Berthold Federal Implementation Plan

Control Device Monitoring Cost Data Analysis for ICR Burden

February 2013

Cost Parameter EOGa QEPa

Single Tip Utility 

Flare Scenario 

with 1 Enclosed 

Combustor

Average Facilityb

 - 

1 Single Tip 

Utility Flare w/ 

continuous pilot 

and 2 enclosed 

combustors w/ 2 

auto ignition

Auto ignition - Total Capital Investment $12,000.00 $4,100.00

Auto Ignition - Life Expectancy 10 10

Auto Ignition CRF Factor @ 7% 0.14238 0.14238

Auto Ignition - TCI annual cost $1,708.56 $583.76 $1,146.16 $2,292.32

Auto ignition - Annual O&M cost $1,000.00 $1,500.00 $1,250.00 $2,500.00

Auto ignition - Total Annual Cost $2,708.56 $2,083.76 $2,396.16 $4,792.32

Continuous Pilot - Total Capital 

Investment

$12,000.00 $4,500.00

Continuous Pilot - Life Expectancy 10 10

Continuous Pilot CRF Factor @ 7% 0.14238 0.14238

Continuous Pilot - TCI annual cost $1,708.56 $640.71 $1,174.64 $1,174.64

Continuous Pilot - Annual O&M cost $1,000.00 $3,500.00 $2,250.00 $2,250.00

Continuous Pilot - Total Annual Cost $2,708.56 $4,140.71 $3,424.64 $3,424.64

Total Capital Cost for Typical Facility $3,466.95

Total O&M Cost for Typical Facility $4,750.00

TOTAL - Total Annual Cost $8,216.95

b On average, an oil and natural production facility was determined to consists of 2 wells per facility. We based 

our cost estimate on 1 utility flare and 2 enclosed combustors for each oil and natural gas production facility. 

a EOG and QEP were the only 2 operators to include annual O&M cost specific to control device monitoring 

operations
### Part B—Land and Water Conservation Fund
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  SBA Leadership 
-  Katie Frost 

#   Katie Frost

Associate Administrator

Office of Capital Access

Katie Frost serves as the Associate Administrator for SBA’s Office of Capital Access (OCA) where she leads the Agency’s loan programs and surety bond program.

Prior to leading OCA, Mrs. Frost served as a Deputy Associate Administrator for OCA and a Senior Advisor in SBA’s Office of the Administrator. Before joining SBA, Mrs. Frost served in several leadership positions in government operational improvement, data analytics, and management consulting.

Mrs. Frost holds an MPP from the Harvard Kennedy School **,** where she was a Belfer Scholar, and a BA in Political Science from UCLA.
### SUBCHAPTER I—COORDINATION AND STRATEGIC PLANNING OF FEDERAL EFFORT AGAINST COUNTERFEITING AND INFRINGEMENT
THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

*********************************************

TO THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW OF SMITH COUNTY, GREETING:

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 10th

day of June, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

ALICE JONES, Appellant

NO. 12-15-00136-CV; Trial Court No. 13-1080-E

By per curiam opinion.

HARVEY JONES, Appellee

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

“THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being considered, 

it is the opinion of this court that this court is without jurisdiction of the appeal, and that the 

appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that this appeal be, 

and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of jurisdiction; and that this decision be certified to 

the court below for observance.”

WHEREAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals 

for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly 

recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN, Chief Justice of our Court 

of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of 

Tyler, this the 24th day of August, 2015.

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

By: _______________________________

Chief Deputy Clerk
# C_2012287EN.01001401.xml

| 22.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/14

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 July 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — DTZ Zadelhoff vof v Staatssecretaris van Financiën

(Case C-259/11) (1)

1

(Sixth VAT Directive - Articles 5(3)(c) and 13B(d)(5) - Negotiation of a transaction involving the transfer of company shares - Transaction which also entails the transfer of the ownership of immovable property held by such companies - Exemption)

2012/C 287/23

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: DTZ Zadelhoff vof

Applicant:

Defendant: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Interpretation of Articles 5(3)(c) and 13B(d)(5) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1) — Exemptions laid down in the Sixth Directive — Transactions relating to the securities referred to in Article 13B(d)(5) — Transfer of shares of companies also entailing the transfer of the ownership of immovable property belonging to those companies.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 13B(d)(5) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment must be interpreted as meaning that the exemption from value added tax in that provision covers transactions, such as those at issue in the main proceedings, which are designed to transfer shares in the companies concerned and have that effect but which, in the final analysis, concern immovable property held by those companies and the (indirect) transfer of that property. The exception to the exemption provided for in the second indent of that provision is not applicable if the Member State has not availed itself of the possibility provided by Article 5(3)(c) of the Sixth Directive of considering shares or interests equivalent to shares giving the holder thereof de jure or de facto rights of ownership or possession over immovable property to be tangible property.

---

(1)  OJ C 252, 27.8.2011.

1

---
#### § 25.51 Purpose and authority.

The purpose of this subpart is to establish policies and procedures implementing the National Motor Vehicle Title Information System (NMVTIS) in accordance with title 49 U.S.C. 30502. The purpose of NMVTIS is to assist in efforts to prevent the introduction or reintroduction of stolen motor vehicles into interstate commerce, protect states and individual and commercial consumers from fraud, reduce the use of stolen vehicles for illicit purposes including fundraising for criminal enterprises, and provide consumer protection from unsafe vehicles.
### §1407. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Marine Mammal Commission, for purposes of carrying out this subchapter, $1,500,000 for fiscal year 1994, $1,550,000 for fiscal year 1995, $1,600,000 for fiscal year 1996, $1,650,000 for fiscal year 1997, $1,700,000 for fiscal year 1998, and $1,750,000 for fiscal year 1999.

(Pub. L. 92–522, title II, §207, Oct. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 1046; Pub. L. 95–136, §3, Oct. 18, 1977, 91 Stat. 1167; Pub. L. 95–316, §4, July 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 381; Pub. L. 103–238, §9(b), Apr. 30, 1994, 108 Stat. 543.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in Pub. L. 97–58, §7(c), Oct. 9, 1981, 95 Stat. 987; Pub. L. 98–364, title I, §104(3), July 17, 1984, 98 Stat. 442; Pub. L. 100–711, §6(3), Nov. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 4771, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–238, §9(c).

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–238 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section read as follows: "There are authorized to be appropriated for the fiscal year in which this subchapter is enacted and for the next five fiscal years thereafter such sums as may be necessary to carry out this subchapter, but the sums appropriated for any fiscal year other than the fiscal year ending September 30, 1978, shall not exceed $1,000,000, the sum appropriated for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1978, shall not exceed $2,000,000, the sum appropriated for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1979, shall not exceed $1,000,000, the sum appropriated for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1980, shall not exceed $1,000,000, and the sum appropriated for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1981, shall not exceed $1,000,000."

1978—Pub. L. 95–316 added provisions authorizing appropriations for the fiscal years ending Sept. 30, 1979, Sept. 30, 1980, and Sept. 30, 1981.

1977—Pub. L. 95–136 substituted "five fiscal years" for "four fiscal years" and "the sums appropriated for any fiscal year other than the fiscal year ending September 30, 1978, shall not exceed $1,000,000, and the sum appropriated for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1978, shall not exceed $2,000,000" for "the sums appropriated for any such year shall not exceed $1,000,000" and struck out requirement that not less than two-thirds of the sums appropriated pursuant to this section for any such year be expended on research and studies under authority of section 1402(a)(2) and (3) of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective upon the expiration of the sixty-day period following Oct. 21, 1972, see section 4 of Pub. L. 92–522, set out as a note under section 1361 of this title.
### §548.1 Prohibition against officers and employees being interested in contracts for materials

No officer, enlisted member, or civilian member of the Coast Guard in any manner connected with the construction, operation, or maintenance of lighthouses, shall be interested, either directly or indirectly, in any contract for labor, materials, or supplies for the construction, operation, or maintenance of lighthouses, or in any patent, plan, or mode of construction or illumination, or in any article of supply for the construction, operation, or maintenance of lighthouses.

(Added Pub. L. 116–283, div. G, title LVXXXV [LXXXV], §8509(b), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4756.)

1 Another section 548 is set out after section 550 of this title.
-  Home 
-  Publications 

# In This Section

                      -  Studies                          -  Economic Impact Study 
                        -  Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Seaway Study 
                        -  Infrastructure Investment Survey 
                        -  Safety Impact Study 
                        -  Social Impact Study 
                      -  Publications                          -  Seaway Compass 
                        -  Seaway System Directory 
                        -  Marketing Materials 
                      -  Reports                          -  Annual Reports 
                        -  Seaway Infrastructure Program 
                      -  Other Resources                          -  Electronic Reading Room 
                        -  National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) 
                        -  GLS Federal Grants Toolkit 
                        -  Green Shipping Corridor Network (GSCN) 
                        -  GSCN Framework 
                        -  Transportation ROUTES 

# GSCN Framework of Goals and Objectives

GSCN Objectives Goals concept document.pdf (236.04 KB)

*DOT is committed to ensuring that information is available in appropriate alternative formats to meet the requirements of persons who have a disability. If you require an alternative version of files provided on this page, please contact					LaToya.James@dot.gov.*
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO

. 09

- 1 8

- 00 272

- C V



### ____________________

CITY OF BEAUMONT

, Appellant

V.

JOSEPH FAZIO , Appellee

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On A ppeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No

. 129808

________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On August 9, 2018, we abated this accelerated appeal and remand ed the case

to the trial court for rendition of an agreed final judgment in accordance with the

parties’ settlement agreement

. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(C). On August 20

,

201 8 , the appellant , the City of Beaumont, filed an unopposed motion to dismiss its

appeal. According to the City, the trial court s igned an agreed final j ud gment on

August 14, 2018.2 The appeal is hereby reinstated. The m otion to dismiss the appeal is granted

and the appeal is dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1).

APPEAL DISMISS ED.

________________________________ HOLLIS HORTON

Justice

Submitted on August 29, 2018

Opinion Delivered August 30, 2018

Before McKei then, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.