alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011179EN.01001101.xml

| 18.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/11

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de Cassation (France) lodged on 1 April 2011 — Auto 24 SARL v Jaguar Land Rover France

(Case C-158/11)

2011/C 179/19

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Cour de Cassation

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Auto 24 SARL

Applicant:

Defendant: Jaguar Land Rover France

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

What is to be understood by the words ‘specified criteria’ in Article 1(1)(f) of Regulation No 1400/2002 (1) as regards a quantitative selective distribution?

1

---

(1)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 1400/2002 of 31 July 2002 on the application of Article 81(3) of the Treaty to categories of vertical agreements and concerted practices in the motor vehicle sector (OJ 2002 L 203, p. 30).

1

---
# C_2013108EN.01001802.xml

| 13.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/18

---

Order of the President of the Third Chamber of the Court of 8 February 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Palermo — Sezione di Bagheria — Italy) — Paola Galioto v Maria Guccione, Maria Savona and Fabio Savona

(Case C-464/11) (1)

1

2013/C 108/38

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 340, 19.11.2011.

1

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Quotemedia, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Keith J. Randall, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to my best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                     
|----------------------- |  | --------------------
|By:                     |  | /s/ Keith J. Randall
|                       
|Keith J. Randall       
|Chief Financial Officer
|November 12, 2010
#### CROW *v.*CROW.

1. The, verdict was authorized by tlie evidence.

2. Attacks upon a decree furnish no ground of a motion for a new trial.

3. When the verdict is considered in the light of the pleadings, the construction placed upon it by the court, and its recital in the ground of the amended motion attacking- it as uncertain and indefinite, it is not subject to that criticism there made.

February 17, 1910.

•Complaint. Before Judge Gober. Forsyth superior court.

December 22, 1908.

*Brooke & Henderson,*for plaintiff in error.

*H. L. Patterson,*contra.

Atkinson, J.

The presiding judge construed the verdict rendered by the jury in this case as meaning that they found for the plaintiff the sum of $275 on account of the rental of the land, and in favor of the holder of the fi. fa. for the sum of $374.74 on account of the amount due upon it, leaving a balance in favor of the holder of the fi. fa. of $99.74; and that the land should be sold, this balance should be paid, and the remainder of the proceeds be paid over to the plaintiff. The first two grounds of the amended motion for a new trial seek to attack the construction placed by the court upon the verdict and the decree rendered accordingly. Exceptions to the decree as erroneous furnish no ground for a motion for a new trial, and can not be considered when the decree is thus sought to be attacked. We may therefore reject from consideration the first two grounds of the amended motion. The third ground was as follows: “Because the verdict of the jury in said case, to wit: ‘We the jury find for the plaintiff, two hundred and seventy-five dollars, subject for the land to be sold, find for the defendant three hundred and seventy-four .74 dollars, in favor of the fi. fa./ is indefinite, uncertain, and not capable of an intelligent construction, under the pleadings and evidence of the case.” This ground in effect concedes that the sums found by the jury were $275 and $374.74 respectively, but insists that, treating the amounts to be those stated, the verdict was nevertheless indefinite, uncertain, and not capable of an intelligent and just construction. It does not attack those figures as not being the amounts found by the jury. Assuming the amounts stated to be those as found in the verdict, the balance of the'finding was intelligible and capable of a *11definite and just construction, namely, that the amount which was found in favor of the plaintiff on* account of rents should be credited on the amount found in favor of the defendant on account of the fi. fa., and that the land should be sold and this balance paid from the proceeds. When the pleadings are considered, it is clear that this was the intention of the jury and the meaning of the finding. This ground therefore furnishes no reason for reversal.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
#### City of Camilla *v.*Norris.

Atkinson, J.

1. The charter of a municipality conferred upon it the power “to own, use, and operate for municipal purposes and for profit, a system of waterworks and electric lights) to make rules and regulations regarding the use of the same by the public, and to provide by ordinance for the punishment of those who illegally use said water or light.” (Acts 1907, p. 505, see. 24.) A resident filed a petition for mandamus to compel the municipal authorities to supply water at her residence. It was alleged that the municipality had established a water system with which the applicant’s residence was connected, and was serving the public generally, but without cause had stopped applicant’s supply of water and refused to serve her, although she was due nothing for water rent, and tender of payment in advance was made for the service desired. *Held,*that the petition .was not subject to dismissal on the ground that the plaintiff had a specific legal remedy. See Civil Code, § 4867; 1 Farnham on Water and Water Rights, § 159 (d); McCrary *v.*Beaudry, 67 Cal. 120 (7 Pac. 764); State *v.*Joplin Waterworks, 52 Mo. App., 312; Haugen *v.*Albina Light & Water Co., 21 Oregon, 411 (28 Pac. 244, 14 L. R. A. 424).

2. On the trial of an application for. mandamus, if an issue of fact is involved, it may be heard by the judge in vacation' upon the consent of all parties. Civil Code, §4873.

*352April 16, 1910.

Mandamus. Before Judge Parle. Mitchell superior court.

June 1-1, 1909.

*M. C. Bennet,*for plaintiff in error. A. *S. Johnson,*contra.

3. In a ease of the character mentioned in the second headnote, where the parties consented to the time and place of hearing at chambers, as appeal’s from the recitals in the judgment, and at the appointed time and place the trial proceeded before the judge without objection, and the defendant moved to dismiss the application, and the motion was overruled, and the plaintiff offered in evidence an affidavit for the purpose of proving the allegations made in the petition, it was not a valid ground of objection by the defendant to the admission of the affidavit that there were issues of fact involved which should bo passed upon by a jury and not by tire judge presiding at chambers.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur*
November 3, 2011

U.S Department of Transportation

Docket Operations, M-30

West Building ground floor

Room W12-140

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.

Washington, DC 20590

To Whom It May Concern:

United Continental Holdings, Inc., operating certificate CALA 014A (as amended), petitions the 

Administrator for a renewal of Exemption No.: 8653D from 14 CFR Section 121.619(a)(1) and 

(2) in accordance with the provisions of Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) 11.25.

14 CFR Section 121.619 Alternate Airport for destination: IFR Over-the-Top: Domestic 

Operations, states:

(a) No person may dispatch an airplane under IFR or over-the-top unless he lists at 

least one alternate airport for each destination airport in the dispatch release. 

When the weather conditions forecast for the destination and first alternate airport 

are marginal at least one additional alternate must be designated. However, no 

alternate airport is required if for at least 1 hour before and 1 hour after the 

estimated time of arrival at the destination airport the appropriate weather reports 

or forecasts, or any combination of them, indicate –

(1) The ceiling will be at least 2,000 feet above the airport elevation; and

(2) Visibility will be at least 3 miles.

Requested Relief:

As stated in Exemption No. 8653D and as depicted in Operations Specification C355.

Referenced in regulatory docket number FAA-2005-22105, Exemption No. 8653D will expire on 

January 31, 2012. All reasons and substantiation contained in the original petition dated August 

1, 2005, remain the same.

Thank you for your consideration of this petition. Please advise if any further information is 

required for your review.

Sincerely,

Maurice J. Montgomery Jr.

Manager – Flight Operations

233 South Wacker Drive

Chicago, IL 60606

Phone: 872 825-6572

Maurice.Montgomery@united.com
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# AGENCY:

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

HHS gives notice as required by 42 CFR 83.12(e) of a decision to evaluate a petition to designate a class of employees from Mathieson Chemical Co., Pasadena, Texas, to be included in the Special Exposure Cohort under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000. The initial proposed definition for the class being evaluated, subject to revision as warranted by the evaluation, is as follows:

*Facility:*                         Mathieson Chemical Co.                    

*Location:*                         Pasadena, Texas.                    

*Job Titles and/or Job Duties:*                         All employees.                    

*Period of Employment:*                         1951 through October 2009.                    

      ( print page 14977)    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Stuart L. Hinnefeld, Director, Division of Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C-46, Cincinnati, OH 45226, Telephone 877-222-7570. Information requests can also be submitted by e-mail to                         *DCAS@CDC.GOV.*

John Howard,

Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

[FR Doc. 2011-6369 Filed 3-17-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-19-P
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  SBA Leadership 
-  Dilawar Syed 

#   Dilawar Syed

Deputy Administrator

            Download high-resolution image          

Dilawar Syed comes to SBA from the State Department where he championed American businesses as Special Representative for Commercial & Business Affairs. As the State Department’s top commercial diplomat, Deputy Administrator Syed advocated for U.S. companies to compete and win abroad and helped ensure U.S. competitiveness in markets across the globe. In this role, he mobilized the private sector to support the people of Ukraine in the wake of Russia's invasion and advocated for commercial deals in strategic sectors such as aviation and defense, energy, and technology,

Before joining the Biden Administration, Syed was CEO at Lumiata, an AI healthcare company focused on reducing healthcare costs and improving patient outcomes. Previously, Syed was President at the software company Freshworks.   Earlier in his career, Syed oversaw business operations for Yahoo!'s platforms and infrastructure and was a product manager at Siebel Systems and SAP.

 Dilawar Syed has driven civic efforts at the federal, state, and local level focusing on economic growth and entrepreneurship. As the founding Chair of the California Entrepreneurship Task Force with the Governor's Office of Business and Economic Development, Syed promoted inclusive entrepreneurship. He served on President Obama's White House Commission on Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders (AAPIs) and chaired the White House Initiative on AAPIs’ Economic Growth Committee. In that role, Syed led the administration’s engagement with small businesses across the U.S. after the passage of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. In 2020, Syed was tapped by San Jose, Calif. Mayor Sam Liccardo to help lead Silicon Valley’s pandemic economic recovery as a member of the Silicon Valley Recovery Roundtable.  

Syed holds an M.B.A. from The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania and earned a B.A. in Economics and Computer Science from The University of Texas at Austin. 

Follow @SBADeputyAdm on X.

SBA.DeputyAdministrator@sba.gov
## Breadcrumb

-  Inicio 
-  Jobs At SBA 

## Section navigation

-  Ubicaciones de la SBA 
-  Gobierno transparente 
-  SBA Newsroom 
-  Work for SBA    -  Employee life 
  -  Jobs at SBA 
  -  Contracting for SBA 
  -  Disaster response jobs at SBA 
-  Organización 
-  Oversight and advocacy 
-  Information in other languages 

Parte o todo el contenido en esta página disponible solo en inglés.

# Jobs at SBA

## Work for America's small businesses

SBA is committed to building a high-performing, 21st century workforce that possesses the following core attributes: cultural astuteness, technological proficiency, articulate, strong writing capabilities, superior conflict resolution skills, and exceptional presentation skills.

SBA has been a leader in small business development for more than 60 years. In an increasingly globalized economy, we tackle challenges confronted by the small business community across geographic boundaries. Although times have changed since SBA was founded in 1953, the agency's mission—to promote the growth of small business—has not. Today, SBA is more vital than ever. We work in collaboration with partner organizations using cutting-edge technologies and well-tested best practices to multiply our impact on small businesses.

America’s 30 million small businesses are the engine of job creation and economic growth in this country, creating nearly two out of every three new jobs in the United States and employing over half the nation’s workforce. SBA ensures that these businesses have the tools and resources required to start and expand their operations, create jobs that support a growing economy, and strengthen America’s middle class.

SBA and entrepreneurs drive American competitiveness and help grow the economy. Picture yourself at SBA.

Search for open positions at SBA.** **We look forward to having you join our team!
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 51 (Wednesday, March 16, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 14375]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6140]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of the Census


Census Scientific Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of the Census (U.S. Census Bureau) is giving notice 
of a meeting of the Census Scientific Advisory Committee (C-SAC). The 
Committee will address policy, research, and technical issues relating 
to a full range of Census Bureau programs and activities, including 
communications, decennial, demographic, economic, field operations, 
geographic, information technology, and statistics. Last minute changes 
to the agenda are possible, which could prevent giving advance public 
notice of schedule adjustments.

DATES: April 7 and 8, 2011. On April 7, the meeting will begin at 
approximately 9 a.m. and adjourn at approximately 5 p.m. On April 8, 
the meeting will begin at approximately 8:30 a.m. and adjourn at 12 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the U.S. Census Bureau 
Conference Center, 4600 Silver Hill Road, Suitland, Maryland 20746.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeri Green, Committee Liaison Officer, 
U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, Room 8H182, 4600 
Silver Hill Road, Washington, DC 20233, telephone 301-763-6590. For TTY 
callers, please use the Federal Relay Service 1-800-877-8339.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Members of the C-SAC are appointed by the 
Director, U.S. Census Bureau. The Committee provides scientific and 
technical expertise, as appropriate, to address U.S. Census Bureau 
program needs and objectives. The Committee has been established in 
accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Title 5, United 
States Code, Appendix 2, Section 10).
    The meeting is open to the public, and a brief period is set aside 
for public comments and questions. Persons with extensive questions or 
statements must submit them in writing at least three days before the 
meeting to the Committee Liaison Officer named above. If you plan to 
attend the meeting, please register by Monday, April 4, 2011. You may 
access the online registration form with the following link: http://www.regonline.com/csacapr2011. Seating is available to the public on a 
first-come, first-served basis.
    This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should also be directed to the Committee Liaison Officer as soon as 
known, and preferably two weeks prior to the meeting.

    Dated: March 10, 2011.
Robert M. Groves,
Director, Bureau of the Census.
[FR Doc. 2011-6140 Filed 3-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-07-P
### §70e. Enforcement

#### (a) Enforcement by Federal Trade Commission

Except as otherwise specifically provided herein, this subchapter shall be enforced by the Federal Trade Commission under rules, regulations, and procedure provided for in the Federal Trade Commission Act [15 U.S.C. 41 et seq.].

#### (b) Terms of Federal Trade Commission Act incorporated into this subchapter

The Commission is authorized and directed to prevent any person from violating the provisions of this subchapter in the same manner, by the same means, and with the same jurisdiction, powers, and duties as though all applicable terms and provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act [15 U.S.C. 41 et seq.] were incorporated into and made a part of this subchapter; and any such person violating the provisions of this subchapter shall be subject to the penalties and entitled to the privileges and immunities provided in said Federal Trade Commission Act, in the same manner, by the same means, and with the same jurisdiction, powers, and duties as though the applicable terms and provisions of the said Federal Trade Commission Act were incorporated into and made a part of this subchapter.

#### (c) Rules and regulations by Federal Trade Commission

The Commission is authorized and directed to make such rules and regulations, including the establishment of generic names of manufactured fibers, under and in pursuance of the terms of this subchapter as may be necessary and proper for administration and enforcement.

#### (d) Inspection, analyses, tests, etc.

The Commission is authorized to cause inspections, analyses, tests, and examinations to be made of any product subject to this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 85–897, §7, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1721.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal Trade Commission Act, referred to in subsecs. (a) and (b), is act Sept. 26, 1914, ch. 311, 38 Stat. 717, which is classified generally to subchapter I (§41 et seq.) of this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 58 of this title and Tables.
§ 32.11 Scope of subpart. Consistent with § 32.1, this subpart contains provisions applicable to claims made under the Act— ( a ) At 34 U.S.C. 10281(a); or
( b ) At 34 U.S.C. 10286 or Public Law 107-37, with respect to a public safety officer's death.
[71 FR 46037, Aug. 10, 2006, as amended at 83 FR 22383, May 15, 2018]
EXHIBIT 10.26

Amendment to Employment Agreement

        This Amendment to Employment Agreement (this "Amendment") is made and entered into as of the 28th day of March, 2001, by and between Gerber Scientific, Inc., a Connecticutcorporation (the "Company") and Michael J. Cheshire (the "Executive") (the Company and the Executive may collectively be referred to as the "Parties").  This Amendment amends the Employment Agreement by and between the Parties, dated as of January 29,1997, as amended on June 1, 1998 and on June 29, 1999 (collectively the "Employment Agreement").

        Whereas the Company and the Executive wish to amend Article III of the Employment Agreement, 

        Now Therefore, in consideration of the promises and the mutual covenants contained herein, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties, intending legally to bebound, agree as follows:

        Article III, Compensation and Benefits, is hereby amended by deleting Sections 3.2(b)(ii) and 3.2(b)(iii) in their entirety so that Section 3.2(b) shall read and provide as follows:

3.2(b)	Additional Benefits.  In addition to the benefits listed in Section 3.2(a), the Company shall provide to the Executive:

(i)        Four weeks vacation in each calendar year (it is understood that the Company's then existing policy on vacation not taken in any year shall apply to unused vacation); and,

(ii)       Participation in the Company's Supplemental Pension Benefit Plan ("SERP").

        Except as herein provided, the Employment Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.

        In Witness Whereof, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written.

Gerber Scientific, Inc.