alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 0
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 0 appear at 73 FR 73 FR 54947, Sept. 24, 2008.

§ 0.29e Relationship to other departmental units. ( a ) The OIG works cooperatively with other Department components to assure that allegations of employee misconduct are investigated by the appropriate entity: ( 1 ) The OIG refers to DOJ-OPR allegations of misconduct within DOJ-OPR's jurisdiction and may refer to another component the investigation of an allegation of misconduct on the part of an employee of that component;
( 2 ) The OIG may refer to a Department component's internal affairs office allegations of misconduct within that office's jurisdiction or may investigate such allegations on its own;
( 3 ) DOJ-OPR refers to the OIG allegations involving misconduct by Department attorneys or investigators that do not relate to the exercise of an attorney's authority to investigate, litigate, or provide legal advice.
( 4 ) The OIG and the FBI notify each other of the existence of criminal investigations that fall within their joint jurisdiction to investigate crimes involving the operations of the Department, except where such notification could compromise the integrity of an investigation;
( 5 ) All Department components report to the OIG all non-frivolous allegations of criminal wrongdoing and serious administrative misconduct involving any of their employees except allegations involving Department attorneys and investigators that relate to an attorney's authority to litigate, investigate, or provide legal advice.
( 6 ) At the request of the Inspector General, the Deputy Attorney General may assign to the OIG a matter within the investigative jurisdiction of DOJ-OPR. In such instances, the OIG shall either: ( i ) Notify DOJ-OPR of its request to the Deputy Attorney General or
( ii ) Request that the Deputy Attorney General determine that such notification would undermine the integrity of the investigation nor jeopardize the interests of the complainant.
( 7 ) While an issue of investigative jurisdiction or assignment is pending before the Deputy Attorney General, neither the OIG DOJ-OPR shall undertake any investigative activity without authorization from the Deputy Attorney General.
( b ) OIG investigations that result in findings of potential criminal misconduct or civil liability are referred to the appropriate prosecutorial or litigative office.
( c ) The OIG advises DOJ-OPR of the existence and results of any investigation that reflects upon the ethics, competence, or integrity of a Department attorney for appropriate action by DOJ-OPR.
( d ) OIG investigations that result in findings of administrative misconduct are reported to management for appropriate disposition.
[Order No. 2167-98, 63 FR 36847, July 8, 1998; 63 FR 40788, July 30, 1998, as amended by Order No. 2492-2001, 66 FR 37903, July 20, 2001]
### SUBCHAPTER V–A—OTHER CONSERVATION PROGRAMS
§ 1317.515 Compensation. A recipient shall not make or enforce any policy or practice that, on the basis of sex: ( a ) Makes distinctions in rates of pay or other compensation;
( b ) Results in the payment of wages to employees of one sex at a rate less than that paid to employees of the opposite sex for equal work on jobs the performance of which requires equal skill, effort, and responsibility, and that are performed under similar working conditions.
Editorial Note on Part 28
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear at 76 FR 76873, Dec. 9, 2011.

§ 28.22 Administrative judges. ( a ) *Exercise of authority.* Administrative judges may exercise authority as provided in paragraph (b) of this section upon their own initiative or upon the motion of a party, as appropriate.
( b ) *Authority.* Administrative judges shall conduct fair and impartial hearings and take all necessary action to avoid delay in the disposition of all proceedings. They shall have all powers necessary to that end unless otherwise limited by law, including, but not limited to, the authority to: ( 1 ) Administer oaths and affirmations;
( 2 ) Issue subpoenas in accordance with § 28.46;
( 3 ) Rule upon offers of proof and receive relevant evidence;
( 4 ) Rule upon discovery issues as appropriate under §§ 28.42 through 28.45;
( 5 ) Convene a hearing as appropriate, regulate the course of the hearing, maintain decorum and exclude from the hearing any disruptive persons;
( 6 ) Exclude from the hearing any witness, except the petitioner(s), whose later testimony might be colored by testimony of other witnesses, or any persons whose presence might have a chilling effect on a testifying witness;
( 7 ) Rule on all motions, witness and exhibit lists and proposed findings;
( 8 ) Require the filing of memoranda of law and the presentation of oral argument with respect to any question of law;
( 9 ) Order the production of evidence and the appearance of witnesses whose testimony would be relevant, material and not repetitious;
( 10 ) Impose sanctions as provided under § 28.24 of this part;
( 11 ) Hold prehearing conferences for the settlement and simplification of issues; and
( 12 ) Issue initial decisions, as appropriate.
[58 FR 61992, Nov. 23, 1993, as amended at 68 FR 69301, Dec. 12, 2003]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

BRIAN WALKER , Defendant Below, Appellant,

v.
STATE OF DELAWARE , Plaintiff Below , Appellee. § § No. 487 , 2018 § § Court Below

— Superior Court § of the State of Delaware § § Cr. ID No. 0802005060 ( S) § § § §

Submitted: December 20, 2018 Decided: January 9 , 2019

Before STRINE , Chief Justice ; VALIHURA and TRAYNOR , Justices.

ORDER

After consideration of the notice to show cause and the appellant’s response

to the notice to show cause , it appears to the Court that: (1) On September 20, 2018 , the appellant, Brian Walker , filed a notice of appeal from a September 14, 2018 Superior Court order sentencing him for a violation of probation

. T he Senior Court Clerk advised Walker to pay the Supreme

Court filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis by October 5, 2018

. Walker was warned that a notice to show cause w ould issue if the filing fee was not paid or a motion to proceed in forma pauperis was not filed by October 5, 2018

. (2) Walker did not pay the filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis . On October 23 , 2018, the Chief Deputy Clerk issued a no tice directing2

Walker to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed for his failure to pay the filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis

. (3) In his response to the notice to show cause, Walker stated that he had

not been able to go to the library or obtain notarization of his paperwork, but would

be able to do so if he was granted an extension

. On December 4, 2018, the Senior

Court Clerk informed Walker that the notice to show cause would be held in abeyance pending his filing of a mo tion to proceed in forma pauperis by December 19, 2018. Walker was warned that his appeal would be dismissed if he failed to file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis by December 19, 2018. Walker has failed to pay the filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis

. In light of Walker’s failure to pay the filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis , this appeal

must be dismissed. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rule 29 (b) , that this appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura Justice
EXHIBIT 31.1


                 CERTIFICATION BY MARK W. MCCUTCHEON PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Mark W. McCutcheon, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Golden Enterprises,  Inc.,
for the fiscal year ended June 2, 2006;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a)  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c)  Disclosed  in this  report  any  change in the  registrant's  internal
control over financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual  report)  that  has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely  to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying  officer(s) and I have disclosed,  based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     (a) all significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.


Date: August 25, 2006

/s/ Mark W. McCutcheon
----------------------
Mark W. McCutcheon
President and Chief Executive Officer



                                       69
### §3744. Recommendation for promotion of an officer previously removed from an active status

A Reserve officer recommended for promotion by a selection board but not promoted because of removal from an active status shall be reconsidered by a selection board after returning to an active status and if selected shall be placed on a recommended list of selectees for promotion. A Reserve officer to whom this section applies is not considered to have failed of selection when eliminated from a list of selectees for promotion solely as a result of being removed from an active status.

(Added Pub. L. 96–322, §1, Aug. 4, 1980, 94 Stat. 1012, §733; renumbered §3744, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §118(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4233.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 777 of this title prior to the complete revision of former chapter 21 of this title by Pub. L. 96–322.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 733 of this title as this section.
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Jaime W. Ellertson, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of S1Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 10, 2004                                 /s/ Jaime W. Ellertson   Jaime W. Ellertson   Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 10.3

A copy of Amendment to Salary Continuation Plan, Retirement and Disability
 for John S. Stein dated April 9, 2002.

                                      AMENDMENT
                       TO SALARY CONTINUATION PLAN,
                          RETIREMENT AND DISABILITY


WHEREAS, Golden Enterprises, Inc. ("Employer") and John S. Stein
("Employee") entered into a Salary Continuation Plan, Retirement and
Disability
("Plan"); and

WHEREAS, such Plan is still in force and effect; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of the Plan, such agreement could
be terminated without further liability of Employer at any time by the
Employer's
Board of Directors; and

WHEREAS, Employer and Employee wish to add additional terms to
the Plan and acknowledge certain original terms and intention
of the Employer and Employee with regard to the Plan.

NOW, THEREFORE, Employer and Employee hereby amend and
acknowledge portions of the Plan as follows:

1. Employer and Employee hereby acknowledge and agree that
Employer has not created and will not in the future create a
separate fund for the payment of deferred compensation amounts
due to be paid to Employee pursuant
to the terms of the Plan.

2. The Employee acknowledges and agrees that for the purposes of
the payment of the deferred compensation payments due Employee
 pursuant to the terms of the Plan, Employee is to be regarded
as a general creditor of the Employer, and that all
amounts due Employee are subject to the potential
claims of Employer's
creditors.


3. Employer and Employee hereby agree that upon Employee's retirement,
the deferred compensation payments due Employee can only be
terminated by Employer due to Employee's "competing"
against Employer.  "Competing" against Employer shall
be defined as Employee being in the employ of, consulting for o
r providing any beneficial services (other than investing
in the stock or equity of a publically-held corporation or
entity, if such investment is less than 1% of the outstanding
publically-held stock or equity) for any company or entity
that provides goods and/or services similar to Employer.

4. Employer and Employee hereby agree that the Plan may be
terminated by the Employer's Board of Directors at any time
prior to retirement without further liability to Employer,
however, in the event a majority of the Employer's stock is not
owned, directly or indirectly, by Sloan Y. Bashinsky, Sr.
("Change of Control"), then
upon the date of such Change of Control, the Plan shall
not be terminable for any reason (but shall remain
subject to potential claims of the Company creditors)
and the Board of Directors shall not retain any
ability to terminate the Plan.

Dated this the 9th day of April, 2002.

                          BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
                          GOLDEN ENTERPRISES, INC.


                          By	/S/ MARK W. MCCUTCHEON
                                  Mark W. McCutcheon
                                  President


                             /S/ JOHN S. STEIN
                                John S. Stein - Employee
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Robert W. Humphreys, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Delta Apparel,
Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting. Date: November 8, 2004
    /s/  Robert W. HumpheysPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-19-00274-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF D.L., III, D.L., D.A.R. and D.G., Children

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018PA00708

Honorable Norma Gonzales, Judge Presiding

Opinion by: Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 23, 2019

AFFIRMED; MOTION TO WITHDRAW DENIED 

This is an appeal from the trial court’s order terminating appellant L.T.’s parental rights to 

her children, D.L., III, D.L.1

, D.A.R., and D.G. Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a motion 

to withdraw and a brief representing that he conducted a professional evaluation of the record and 

determined there are no arguable grounds to be raised on appeal. The brief satisfies the 

requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). See In re P.M., 520 S.W.3d 24, 27 

n.10 (Tex. 2016) (per curiam) (recognizing Anders procedure applies in parental termination 

appeals). Counsel also certified that he sent a copy of the brief and the motion to withdraw to 

appellant, informed appellant of her right to review the record and file her own brief, and provided 

 1 The Anders brief mistakenly refers to this child as A.L. The final order of termination and the rest of the record 

identify the child as D.L.
04-19-00274-CV

- 2 -

appellant with a form motion to request access to the record. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 

319-20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); In re A.L.H., No. 04-18-00153-CV, 2018 WL 3861695, at *2 

(Tex. App.—San Antonio Aug. 15, 2018, no pet.). This court issued an order setting the deadlines

for appellant to request the record and file a pro se brief. Appellant did not request the record or 

submit a pro se brief.

After reviewing the record and counsel’s brief, we agree that there are no meritorious issues 

to be raised and the appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s order. We deny 

counsel’s motion to withdraw because he does not assert any ground for withdrawal other than his 

conclusion that the appeal is frivolous. In re P.M., 520 S.W.3d at 27-28 (holding counsel’s 

obligations in parental termination cases extend through the exhaustion or waiver of all appeals, 

including the filing of a petition for review in the Texas Supreme Court).

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 85 

To reauthorize the Family Violence Prevention and Services Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 10, 2019 

Mr. GRASSLEY (for himself, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mrs. CAPITO, and Mr. TILLIS) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Family Violence Prevention and Services 

Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION AND SERV4 ICES. 

5 Section 303 of the Family Violence Prevention and 

6 Services Act (42 U.S.C. 10403) is amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ‘‘2011 

8 through 2015’’ and inserting ‘‘2020 through 2024’’; 

9 (2) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘2011 through 

10 2015’’ and inserting ‘‘2020 through 2024’’; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 85 IS

1 (3) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘2011 through 

2 2015’’ and inserting ‘‘2020 through 2024’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS