Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 52 / Thursday, March 17, 2011 / Notices 14691 

Noramco Inc., to ensure that the 

company’s registration is consistent 

with the public interest. The 

investigation has included inspection 

and testing of the company’s physical 

security systems, verification of the 

company’s compliance with state and 

local laws, and a review of the 

company’s background and history. 

Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823(a), 

and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, 

the above named company is granted 

registration as a bulk manufacturer of 

the basic classes of controlled 

substances listed. 

Dated: March 9, 2011. 

Joseph T. Rannazzisi, 

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of 

Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2011–6155 Filed 3–16–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–09–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–70,460] 

Delphi Steering, Including On-Site 

Leased Workers From Acro Service 

Corporation, Aerotek, Inc., Continental, 

Inc., Dynamic Corp., G-Tech 

Professional Staffing, Inc., Globaledge 

Technologies, Inc. (Formerly CAE 

Tech), Gonzalez Contract Services, 

Integrated Partners Group LLC, Kelly 

Services, Manpower, Inc., Rapid Global 

Business Solutions, Inc., TAC 

Worldwide, Trialon Corp., Trison 

Business Solutions, Wright K. 

Technologies, Interim Health Care and 

Advantage Technical Resourcing, 

Saginaw, MI; Amended Certification 

Regarding Eligibility To Apply for 

Worker Adjustment Assistance 

In accordance with section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 

19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor 

issued a Certification of Eligibility to 

Apply for Worker Adjustment 

Assistance on July 14, 2009, applicable 

to workers of Delphi Steering, including 

on-site leased workers from Bartech and 

Securitas, Saginaw, Michigan. The 

notice was published in the Federal 

Register on September 2, 2009 (74 FR 

45477). The notice was amended on 

October 7, 2009, November 2, 2009 and 

July 22, 2010 to include on-site leased 

workers. The notices were published in 

the Federal Register on October 20, 

2009 (74 FR 53760–53761), December 8, 

2009 (74 FR 64716) and August 2, 2010 

(75 FR 45159–45160). 

At the request of the State Agency, the 

Department reviewed the certification 

for workers of the subject firm. The 

workers are engaged in the production 

of steering systems and components 

such as steering columns, gears, pumps 

and electronic power steering systems. 

The company reports that on-site 

leased workers from Advantage 

Technical Resourcing were employed 

on-site at the Saginaw, Michigan 

location of Delphi Steering. The 

Department has determined that these 

workers were sufficiently under the 

control of the subject firm to be 

considered leased workers. 

Based on these findings, the 

Department is amending this 

certification to include workers leased 

from Advantage Technical Resourcing 

working on-site at the Saginaw, 

Michigan location of Delphi Steering. 

The amended notice applicable to 

TA–W–70,460 is hereby issued as 

follows: 

All workers of Delphi Steering, including 

on-site leased workers from Bartech, 

Securitas, Acro Service Corp., Aerotek, Inc., 

Continental, Inc., Dynamic Corp., G-Tech 

Professional Staffing, Inc., GlobalEdge 

Technologies, Inc., (formerly CAE Tech), 

Gonzalez Contract Services, Integrated 

Partners Group LLC, Kelly Services, 

Manpower, Inc., Rapid Global Business 

Solutions, Inc., TAC Worldwide, Trialon 

Corp., Trison Business Solutions, Wright K. 

Technologies, Interim Health Care and 

Advantage Technical Resourcing, Saginaw, 

Michigan, who became totally or partially 

separated from employment on or after May 

20, 2008, through July 14, 2011, and all 

workers in the group threatened with total or 

partial separation from employment on date 

of certification through two years from the 

date of certification, are eligible to apply for 

adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of 

Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 17th day of 

February 2011. 

Michael W. Jaffe, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2011–6191 Filed 3–16–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Notice of Determinations Regarding 

Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 

U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor 

herein presents summaries of 

determinations regarding eligibility to 

apply for trade adjustment assistance for 

workers by (TA–W) number issued 

during the period of February 28, 2011 

through March 4, 2011. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for workers of 

a primary firm and a certification issued 

regarding eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(a) of the Act must be met. 

I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the 

following must be satisfied: 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) the sales or production, or both, of 

such firm have decreased absolutely; 

and 

(3) One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

(A) Imports of articles or services like 

or directly competitive with articles 

produced or services supplied by such 

firm have increased; 

(B) imports of articles like or directly 

competitive with articles into which one 

or more component parts produced by 

such firm are directly incorporated, 

have increased; 

(C) imports of articles directly 

incorporating one or more component 

parts produced outside the United 

States that are like or directly 

competitive with imports of articles 

incorporating one or more component 

parts produced by such firm have 

increased; 

(D) imports of articles like or directly 

competitive with articles which are 

produced directly using services 

supplied by such firm, have increased; 

and 

(4) the increase in imports contributed 

importantly to such workers’ separation 

or threat of separation and to the decline 

in the sales or production of such firm; 

or 

II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the 

following must be satisfied: 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

(A) There has been a shift by the 

workers’ firm to a foreign country in the 

production of articles or supply of 

services like or directly competitive 

with those produced/supplied by the 

workers’ firm; 

(B) there has been an acquisition from 

a foreign country by the workers’ firm 

of articles/services that are like or 

directly competitive with those 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
14692 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 52 / Thursday, March 17, 2011 / Notices 

produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; 

and 

(3) the shift/acquisition contributed 

importantly to the workers’ separation 

or threat of separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected workers in public agencies and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(b) of the Act must be met. 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in the public agency have 

become totally or partially separated, or 

are threatened to become totally or 

partially separated; 

(2) the public agency has acquired 

from a foreign country services like or 

directly competitive with services 

which are supplied by such agency; and 

(3) the acquisition of services 

contributed importantly to such 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected secondary workers of a firm and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(c) of the Act must be met. 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in the workers’ firm have 

become totally or partially separated, or 

are threatened to become totally or 

partially separated; 

(2) the workers’ firm is a Supplier or 

Downstream Producer to a firm that 

employed a group of workers who 

received a certification of eligibility 

under Section 222(a) of the Act, and 

such supply or production is related to 

the article or service that was the basis 

for such certification; and 

(3) either— 

(A) the workers’ firm is a supplier and 

the component parts it supplied to the 

firm described in paragraph (2) 

accounted for at least 20 percent of the 

production or sales of the workers’ firm; 

or 

(B) a loss of business by the workers’ 

firm with the firm described in 

paragraph (2) contributed importantly to 

the workers’ separation or threat of 

separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected workers in firms identified by 

the International Trade Commission and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 222(f) 

of the Act must be met. 

(1) the workers’ firm is publicly 

identified by name by the International 

Trade Commission as a member of a 

domestic industry in an investigation 

resulting in— 

(A) an affirmative determination of 

serious injury or threat thereof under 

section 202(b)(1); 

(B) an affirmative determination of 

market disruption or threat thereof 

under section 421(b)(1); or 

(C) an affirmative final determination 

of material injury or threat thereof under 

section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A)); 

(2) the petition is filed during the 1- 

year period beginning on the date on 

which— 

(A) a summary of the report submitted 

to the President by the International 

Trade Commission under section 

202(f)(1) with respect to the affirmative 

determination described in paragraph 

(1)(A) is published in the Federal 

Register under section 202(f)(3); or 

(B) notice of an affirmative 

determination described in 

subparagraph (1) is published in the 

Federal Register; and 

(3) the workers have become totally or 

partially separated from the workers’ 

firm within— 

(A) the 1-year period described in 

paragraph (2); or 

(B) notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), 

the 1-year period preceding the 1-year 

period described in paragraph (2). 

Affirmative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The date following the company 

name and location of each 

determination references the impact 

date for all workers of such 

determination. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the 

Trade Act have been met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

74,731 .......... Curt Bean Lumber Company, Inc ......................................................... Glenwood, AR ............................... March 14, 2010. 

74,731A ........ Curt Bean Lumber Company, Inc ......................................................... Amity, AR ...................................... March 14, 2010. 

74,773 .......... Welco, LLC, Leased Workers from All Star Staffing ............................ Shelton, WA .................................. October 12, 2009. 

74,914 .......... Holt Sublimation Printing & Products, Inc ............................................ Burlington, NC ............................... November 22, 2009. 

75,063 .......... Whiting Paper Mill, Newpage Corporation ........................................... Stevens Point, WI ......................... December 31, 2009. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or 

services) of the Trade Act have been 

met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

74,882 .......... Fasco Industries, Regal Beloit, RBC Horizon, Cassville ...................... Cassville, MO ................................ November 16, 2009. 

74,997 .......... Emergency First Aid Products, Inc ....................................................... Plattsburgh, NY ............................. December 14, 2009. 

75,002 .......... Brookfield Data Center, Navistar, Anderson International, IBM Global, US Tech Solutions, etc.Brookfield, WI ................................ December 15, 2009. 

75,010 .......... Hachette Book Group, Information Technology Applications, Global 

Employment Solutions, etc.

Boston, MA ................................... November 29, 2009. 

75,029 .......... CompX Precision Slides, Inc, CompX Durislide; Leased Workers 

from Gill Staffing, Manpower, Inc., etc.

Byron Center, MI ........................... December 16, 2009. 

75,031 .......... Time-O-Matic, Inc., Watchfire Holding, Watchfire Enterprises, Leased 

Workers Manpower, etc.

Danville, IL .................................... December 21, 2009. 

75,070 .......... St. Johnson Medical Services PC, Episcopal Health Services, Inc ..... Bethpage, NY ................................ January 5, 2010. 

75,075 .......... Autodesk, Inc., SP&O and GBS Divisions ........................................... Manchester, NH ............................ January 7, 2010. 

75,119 .......... Acme-McCrary Corporation, 159 North St. and 601 E. Pritchard St., 

Express Employment Professionals.

Asheboro, NC ............................... January 19, 2010. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 52 / Thursday, March 17, 2011 / Notices 14693 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

75,119A ........ Acme-McCrary Corporation, 159 North St. and 601 E. Pritchard St., 

Express Employment Professionals.

Siler City, NC ................................ January 19, 2010. 

75,153 .......... HSBC Card Services, Inc., Quality Monitoring; Wages Reported 

under HSBC Technology & Services, Inc.

Tigard, OR .................................... January 27, 2010. 

75,164 .......... Rosemount Analytical, Emerson, Leased Workers Supervisor Staffing, Resource & Rainmaker Staffing.Irvine, CA ...................................... January 31, 2010. 

75,165 .......... Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc., EIT/TSS Application Configuration Support (ACS).Hartford, CT .................................. January 31, 2010. 

75,166 .......... Hewlett Packard Company, Imaging & Printing, Graphics Solutions 

Business, etc.

Minnetonka, MN ............................ December 3, 2010. 

75,179 .......... Stratus Technologies, Inc ..................................................................... Maynard, MA ................................. February 3, 2010. 

75,189 .......... Roche Carolina, Inc., F. Hoffman-LA Roche, Pharmaceutical, 

Pharma Technical, Olsten Staffing, etc.

Florence, SC ................................. February 7, 2010. 

75,193 .......... TydenBrooks Security Products Group, Telesearch Staffing and Express Employment Professionals.Newton, NJ ................................... February 8, 2010. 

75,216 .......... Russell Newman, Inc., RNA Holdings, LLC; Leased Workers from 

Hour Personnel Services, etc.

Denton, TX .................................... February 10, 2010. 

75,216A ........ RNA Holdings, LLC, New York Division; SE–RN Holdings, LLC ........ New York, NY ............................... February 10, 2010. 

75,241 .......... Tyco Electronics, ADC Telecommunications; Leased Workers from 

Salo, Adecco, Aerotek, etc.

Eden Prairie, MN .......................... February 10, 2010. 

75,241A ........ Tyco Electronics, ADC Telecommunications; Leased Workers from 

Salo, Adecco, Aerotek, etc.

Shakopee, MN .............................. February 10, 2010. 

75,242 .......... Sensormatic Electronics, LLC, Tyco International, Roth Staffing ........ Boca Raton, FL ............................. February 10, 2010. 

75,277 .......... Steelcase, Inc., Wood Plant ................................................................. Caledonia, MI ................................ June 14, 2011. 

75,277A ........ Manpower, Working On-Site at Steelcase, Inc.; Wood Plant .............. Caledonia, MI ................................ February 1, 2010. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(c) (supplier to a firm whose workers 

are certified eligible to apply for TAA) 

of the Trade Act have been met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

74,729 .......... Kemco, Inc ............................................................................................ Travelers Rest, SC ....................... October 13, 2009. 

75,236 .......... Silberline Manufacturing Company, Inc., Hometown Facility ............... Tamaqua, PA ................................ March 10, 2011. 

75,236A ........ Silberline Manufacturing Company, Inc., Lansford Facility .................. Lansford, PA ................................. March 10, 2011. 

75,236B ........ Silberline Manufacturing Company, Inc., Tidewood Facility ................ Tamaqua, PA ................................ March 10, 2011. 

75,236C ....... Silberline Manufacturing Company, Inc., Decatur Facility ................... Decatur, IN .................................... March 10, 2011. 

Negative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

In the following cases, the 

investigation revealed that the eligibility 

criteria for worker adjustment assistance 

have not been met for the reasons 

specified. 

The investigation revealed that the 

criterion under paragraph (a)(1), or 

(b)(1), or (c)(1) (employment decline or 

threat of separation) of section 222 has 

not been met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact 

date 

74,801 .......... Analog Devices ................................................................................................. Wilmington, MA. 

75,071 .......... Acuity Brand Lighting, Inc., Acuity Brands, Inc ................................................ Newark, OH.

75,099 .......... West, Thomson Reuters Business, Thomson Reuters Legal, Adecco ............ Albuquerque, NM.

75,135 .......... Flowserve Corporation ..................................................................................... Albuquerque, NM.

75,177 .......... Digital Networking, LLC .................................................................................... Denver, CO.

The investigation revealed that the 

criteria under paragraphs (a)(2)(A)(i) 

(decline in sales or production, or both) 

and (a)(2)(B) (shift in production or 

services to a foreign country) of section 

222 have not been met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact 

date 

75,059 .......... Durex Products, Inc., Minerals Division, Weir Group ...................................... St. Croix Falls, WI.

The investigation revealed that the 

criteria under paragraphs (a)(2)(A) 

(increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift 

in production or services to a foreign 

country) of section 222 have not been 

met. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
14694 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 52 / Thursday, March 17, 2011 / Notices 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact 

date 

74,704 .......... SuperValu, Inc., IT and Finance Department .................................................. Hopkins, MN. 

74,842 .......... Bosch Rexroth Corporation, Robert Bosch Corporation .................................. Buchanan, MI. 

75,101 .......... Burke Grading and Paving, Inc ........................................................................ Drexel, NC. 

75,106 .......... The Factory Company International, Inc., Leased Workers from Humanix .... Spokane, WA. 

75,141 .......... Anthem Insurance Companies, Inc., Anthem BCBS/CMSI, IT Development, 

Wellpoint Companies.

Green Bay, WI. 

75,175 .......... Equitrac Corporation, Field Services Technical, Teleworkers, Leased Workers Kelly, OCG.Plantation, FL. 

75,185 .......... ZEPF Center ..................................................................................................... Toledo, OH. 

75,226 .......... Wells Fargo & Co., Auto Direct Division .......................................................... Kansas City, MO. 

75,281 .......... South Central Service, Inc ............................................................................... Berea, KY. 

Determinations Terminating 

Investigations of Petitions for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

After notice of the petitions was 

published in the Federal Register and 

on the Department’s Web site, as 

required by Section 221 of the Act (19 

U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated 

investigations of these petitions. 

The following determinations 

terminating investigations were issued 

because the petitioner has requested 

that the petition be withdrawn. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact 

date 

75,173 .......... Hire Right, Inc ................................................................................................... Irvine, CA. 

75,220 .......... Tinder Box Trading Company .......................................................................... Mayfield, KY. 

75,233 .......... Peak Oilfield Services ...................................................................................... Anchorage, AK. 

The following determinations 

terminating investigations were issued 

because the petitioning groups of 

workers are covered by active 

certifications. Consequently, further 

investigation in these cases would serve 

no purpose since the petitioning group 

of workers cannot be covered by more 

than one certification at a time. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact 

date 

74,907 .......... Tektronix TCS and TSS ................................................................................... Beaverton, OR. 

I hereby certify that the 

aforementioned determinations were 

issued during the period of February 28, 

2011 through March 4, 2011. Copies of 

these determinations may be requested 

under the Freedom of Information Act. 

Requests may be submitted by fax, 

courier services, or mail to FOIA 

Disclosure Officer, Office of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance (ETA), U.S. 

Department of Labor, 200 Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 or 

tofoiarequest@dol.gov. These 

determinations also are available on the 

Department’s Web site at http:// 

www.doleta.gov/tradeact under the 

searchable listing of determinations. 

Dated: March 10, 2011. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance . 

[FR Doc. 2011–6189 Filed 3–16–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Notice of Funding Opportunity and 

Solicitation for Grant Applications 

(SGA) for National Farmworker Jobs 

Training Program (NFJP) 

AGENCY: Employment and Training 

Administration, Labor. 

ACTION: Notice of Solicitation for Grant 

Applications (SGA). 

Funding Opportunity Number: SGA– 

DFA–PY–10–05. 

SUMMARY: The U. S. Department of 

Labor (DOL), Employment and Training 

Administration (ETA), Office of 

Workforce Investment, Division of 

Adult Services, announces a grant 

competition for operating the National 

Farmworker Jobs Program (NFJP), under 

section 167 of the Workforce Investment 

Act (WIA), 29 U.S.C. 2912. WIA 

generally requires DOL to conduct a 

general grants competition every two 

years to select NFJP grantees. 

Under section 167(a) of WIA, the 

Secretary must award grants on a 

competitive basis to eligible entities for 

the purposes of carrying out the 

activities authorized under section 167. 

We are conducting this competition 

before the passage of the Department of 

Labor’s Fiscal Year (FY) 2011 

appropriation in anticipation of the 

appropriation of funds for Program Year 

(PY) 2011 NFJP grants, but we will not 

obligate any funds for PY 2011 grants 

unless and until they are appropriated. 

The FY 2011 appropriations request for 

this program is $78,410,000, to be 

allocated among state service delivery 

areas for operation of NFJP. All 

interested applicants should read this 

notice in its entirety. 

The complete SGA and any 

subsequent SGA amendments are 

described in further detail on ETA’s 

Web site at http://www.doleta.gov/ 

grants or on http://www.grants.gov. The 

Web sites provide application 

information, eligibility requirements, 

review and selection procedures and 

other program requirements governing 

this solicitation. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES