alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Dennis Conroy, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Gilman + Ciocia, Inc.,
(the "Report");

2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this Report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this Report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) Disclosed in this Report any changes in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

      Date: September 28, 2006

                                                   /s/ Dennis Conroy
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Chief Accounting Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-8093

AARON HOLSEY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

WILLIAM W. SONDERVAN, Commissioner,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA01-2558-JFM)

Submitted: April 30, 2002 Decided: May 22, 2002

Before WILKINS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Aaron Holsey, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Aaron Holsey appeals the district court’s orders denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition and denying his

motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning

of the district court. See Holsey v. Sondervan, No. CA-01-2558-JFM

(D. Md. Sept. 25, 2001; Oct. 9, 2001; filed Dec. 3, 2001, entered

Dec. 4, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 154.502 Reports. ( a ) When the natural gas company is required, either by a Commission order or as a part of a settlement in a proceeding initiated under this part 154 or part 284 of this chapter, to make a report on a periodic basis, details about the nature and contents of the report must be provided in an appropriate section of the general terms and conditions of its tariff.
( b ) The details in the general terms and conditions of the tariff must include the frequency and timing of the report. Explain whether the report is filed annually, semi-annually, monthly, or is triggered by an event. If triggered by an event, explain how soon after the event the report must be filed. If the report is periodic, state the dates on which the report must be filed.
( c ) Each report must include: ( 1 ) A letter of transmittal containing: ( i ) A list of the material enclosed;
( ii ) The name and telephone number of a company official who can answer questions regarding the filing;
( iii ) A reference to the authority by which the report is made, including the specific subpart of these regulations, an order of the Commission, a provision of the company's tariff, or any other appropriate authority. If a Commission order is referenced, include the citation to the FERC Reports, the date of issuance, and the docket number;
( iv ) Any requests for waiver. Requests must include a reference to the specific section of the statute, regulations, or the company's tariff from which waiver is sought, and a justification for the waiver.
( 2 ) A certification of service to all affected customers and interested state commissions.
( d ) Each report filed under paragraph (b) of this section must be posted no later than the date of filing.
Editorial Note on Part 0
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 0 appear at 73 FR 73 FR 54947, Sept. 24, 2008.

§ 0.29d Whistleblower protection for FBI employees. ( a ) *Protected disclosures by FBI employees.* Disclosures of information by an FBI employee that the employee reasonably believes evidences any violation of any law, rule, or regulation, or gross mismanagement, gross waste of funds, an abuse of authority, or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety are protected disclosures when they are reported as provided in § 27.1 of this chapter. Any office or official (other than the OIG or DOJ-OPR) receiving a protected disclosure shall promptly report such disclosure to the OIG or DOJ-OPR. The OIG or DOJ-OPR may refer such allegations to FBI Inspection Division (FBI-INSD) Internal Investigations Section for investigation unless the Deputy Attorney General determines that such referral shall not be made.
( b ) *Allegations of retaliation against FBI employees.* Allegations of retaliation against an employee of the FBI who makes a protected disclosure shall be reported to the OIG, DOJ-OPR, or the Deputy Attorney General.
[Order No. 2167-98, 63 FR 36847, July 8, 1998, as amended by Order No. 2492-2001, 66 FR 37903, July 20, 2001; Order No. 2926-2008, 73 FR 1494, Jan. 9, 2008; Order No. 5872-2024, 89 FR 7284, Feb. 2, 2024]
EXHIBIT 23.1




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS




We have issued our report dated September 27, 2012, accompanying the consolidated financial statements in the Annual Report of Gilman Ciocia, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2012.  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of Gilman Ciocia on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-50089, effective April 14, 1998 and File No. 333-14915, effective October 28, 1996).







/s/ Sherb & Co, LLP

Certified Public Accountants









New York, New York


September 28, 2012
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Document Search 
-  Records Management Program 

# Records Management Program

## About this document and download

The purpose of this standard operating procedure (SOP) is to state concisely who does what, when, and how to properly control SBA records and to ensure that we meet the requirements in the following authorities:
                  - Federal Records Act of 1950, as amended (44 U.S.C. 3101, et seq.)
                  - 41 CFR, chapter 201, subchapters A and B and related bulletins and handbooks
                  - 36 CFR, chapter XII
                  - General Accounting Office, (GAO), “Policies and Procedures Manual for Guidance of Federal Agencies,” Title 8, “Records Management.”

This SOP also provides the detail necessary to implement a records management system.

  Download  .pdf

**Effective**
§ 24.202 Net worth exhibit. ( a ) Each applicant except a qualified tax exempt organization or a qualified cooperative must submit with its application a detailed exhibit showing its net worth at the time the proceeding was initiated. If any individual, corporation, or other entity directly or indirectly controls or owns a majority of the voting shares or other interest of the applicant, or if the applicant directly or indirectly owns or controls a majority of the voting shares of other interest of any corporation or other entity, the exhibit must include a showing of the net worth of all such affiliates or of the applicant including the affiliates. The exhibit may be in any form convenient to the applicant, provided that it makes full disclosure of the applicant's and any affiliates' assets and liabilities and is sufficient to determine whether the applicant qualifies under the standards of 5 U.S.C. 504(b)(1)(B)(i). The adjudicative officer may require an applicant to file additional information to determine the applicant's eligibility for an award.
( b ) The net worth exhibit shall describe any transfers of assets from, or obligations incurred by, the applicant or any affiliate, occurring in the one-year period prior to the date on which the proceeding was initiated, that reduced the net worth of the applicant and its affiliates below the applicable net worth ceiling. If there were no such transactions, the applicant shall so state.
( c ) The net worth exhibit shall be included in the public record of the proceeding.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Amending the Federal Reserve Act

              																	United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, 1970-					 and 	Ninety-Sixth Congress, 1979-1981. 						*Amending the Federal Reserve Act : Report (To Accompany H.R. 4998), Calendar No. 453*,										November 20, 1979,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/410,			accessed on September 22, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
June 25 , 2010

Mr. Stan Meiburg Acting Regional Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 61 Fors yth Street Atlanta, Georgia 30303
- 8960 Dear Mr. Meiburg : Re: State Implementation Plan (SI P) Revision Enclosed is a State Implementation P lan (SI P) Revision for the Control of Air Pollution (including the Technical Support Document) concerning amendments to state air pollution control regulations . We are transmitting, under separate cover, additional copies to Dick Schutt of y our agency . We certify

that this SI P revision ha s been completed in accordance with the Mississippi Administrative Procedures Act and the Mississippi Pollution Control Law. We further certify that a public hearing was held to receive comments regarding the SI P Revisi on . We feel that this SI P revision submittal is complete. Therefore, we request approval of this SIP revision by

the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
. If you have an y questions, please advise. Very trul y yours, Trudy D. Fisher Exe cutive Director Enclosure cc: Ms. Beverly

Banister, U .S. EPA, Region IV
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 7370]

*Summary:*                     Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “Cross References” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, DC, from on or about March 24, 2011, until on or about July 31, 2011, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

*For Further Information Contact:*                     For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.                

Dated: March 10, 2011.

Ann Stock,

Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2011-6017 Filed 3-14-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
### §1024. Repealed. Pub. L. 92–471, title I, §108(c), Oct. 9, 1972, 86 Stat. 787

Section, act Aug. 12, 1954, ch. 669, §5, 68 Stat. 698, provided that service of individuals appointed as United States Commissioners shall not be treated as service for purposes of certain sections of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, and Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
### SUBCHAPTER XXIX—CANYONLANDS NATIONAL PARK
### §639a. Review of loan program; submission of estimated needs for additional authorization

It is the sense of the Congress that the regular business loan program of the Small Business Administration should be reviewed by the Congress at least once every two years. It is further the sense of the Congress that the Small Business Administration should submit its estimated needs for additional authorization for such program to the Congress at least one year in advance of the date on which such authorization is to be provided, in order to assure an orderly and recurring review of such program and to avoid emergency appeals for additional authorization. Compliance by the Small Business Administration with the foregoing policy will enable the Congress on and after July 25, 1962, to provide additional authorization for such program on a two-year basis.

(Pub. L. 87–550, §1(b), July 25, 1962, 76 Stat. 221.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Small Business Act which comprises this chapter.
Opioids: Did You 

Know?

Even if a doctor prescribes an opioid, 

there are still risks when taking them, 

including addiction and overdose, 

which may lead to death.

Talk With Your Kids 

About the Facts.

In some cases, your doctor may prescribe an 

opioid to your child for things like surgery or 

a broken bone. Prescription opioids—when 

used long term or incorrectly—can cause 

the brain to become reliant on the drug and 

are extremely addictive.

Start talking with your kids about the facts. For tips on 

how—and when—to begin the conversation, visit 

www.underagedrinking.samhsa.gov.

SMA-18-5078
### SUBCHAPTER XXXI—CAPITOL REEF NATIONAL PARK
§ 27.8 Alternative dispute resolution. ( a ) At any stage in the process set forth in §§ 27.3 through 27.5 of this part, the Complainant may request Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) through the Department of Justice Mediator Corps (DOJMC) Program. The Complainant may elect to participate in ADR by notifying in writing the office before which the matter is then pending.
( b ) If the Complainant elects mediation, the FBI, represented by the Office of General Counsel, will participate.
( c ) When the Complainant requests to engage in ADR, the process set forth in §§ 27.3 through 27.5, as applicable, including all time periods specified therein, will be stayed for an initial period of 90 days, beginning on the date of transmittal of the matter to the DOJMC Program office. Upon joint request by the parties to the office before which the matter is stayed, the period of the stay may be extended up to an additional 45 days. Further requests for extension of the stay may be granted only by the Director, regardless of the office before which the matter is pending, upon a joint request showing good cause. The stay otherwise will be lifted if the DOJMC Program notifies the office before which the matter is stayed that the Complainant no longer wishes to engage in mediation, or that the parties are unable to reach agreement on resolution of the complaint and that continued efforts at mediation would not be productive.
[89 FR 7286, Feb. 2, 2024]
Exhibit 23




               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED ACCOUNTING FIRM


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-119045, 333-78805 and 033-54863) of The Great
Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc. of our report dated May 9, 2006, relating
to the financial statements, management's assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting, which appears in the Annual Report to
Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also
consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated May 9, 2006
relating to the financial statement schedule which appears in this Form 10-K.



New York, New York
May 9, 2006
# C_2011173EN.01001003.xml

| 11.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 173/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 173/10

---

Order of the General Court of 11 April 2011 — Département du Gers v Commission

(Case T-479/10) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Environment and protection of human health - Genetically modified food and feed - No individual concern - Inadmissibility)

2011/C 173/24

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Département du Gers (France) (represented by: S. Mabile and J.-P Mignard, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Bianchi and L. Pignataro, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2010/420/EU of 28 July 2010 authorising the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize MON89034xNK603 (MON-89Ø34-3xMON-ØØ6Ø3-6) pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2010 L 197, p. 15).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible;

| 2. | The Département du Gers is ordered to bear its own costs and pay those of the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Département du Gers is ordered to bear its own costs and pay those of the European Commission;

| 3. | There is no need to adjudicate on the applications to intervene of the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union, the Centre Region, the Picardy Region, the Départment de la Haute–Garonne, the Brittany Region, the Poitou-Charentes Region, the Provence-Alpes-Côte-d'Azur Region, the Burgundy Region, the Midi-Pyrénées Region, the Auvergne Region, the Pays de la Loire Region, the Rhône-Alpes Region, the Départment des Côtes d'Armor, the Île de France Region and the Nord-Pas-de-Calais Region. |
| --- | --- |

3.

There is no need to adjudicate on the applications to intervene of the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union, the Centre Region, the Picardy Region, the Départment de la Haute–Garonne, the Brittany Region, the Poitou-Charentes Region, the Provence-Alpes-Côte-d'Azur Region, the Burgundy Region, the Midi-Pyrénées Region, the Auvergne Region, the Pays de la Loire Region, the Rhône-Alpes Region, the Départment des Côtes d'Armor, the Île de France Region and the Nord-Pas-de-Calais Region.

---

(1)  OJ C 346, 18.12.2010.

1

---