alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
 
                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
 
The Stockholders and Board of Directors
of THE GILLETTE COMPANY:
 
     We consent to incorporation by reference in the following registration
statements of The Gillette Company (1) No. 33-9495 on Form S-8, (2) No. 2-93230
on Form S-8, (3) Nos. 33-56218 and 33-27916 on Form S-8 which incorporate by
reference therein registration statements on Form S-8 Nos. 2-90276, 2-63951 and
1-50710 and No. 2-41016 on Form S-7, (4) No. 33-54974 on Form S-3, (5) No.
33-50303 on Form S-3, (6) No. 33- 52465 on Form S-8, (7) No. 33-53257 on Form
S-8, (8) No. 33-53258 on Form S-8, (9) No. 33-55051 on Form S-3, (10) No.
33-59125 on Form S-8 and (11) No. 33-63707 on Form S-8, of our reports dated
January 23, 1996, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of The Gillette
Company and subsidiary companies as of December 31, 1995 and 1994, consolidated
statements of income and earnings reinvested in the business, and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1995, and the
related financial statement schedule, which reports appear in the December 31,
1995 Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Gillette Company.
 
     Our reports refer to a change in accounting for income taxes,
postretirement and medical benefits and postemployment benefits.
 
                                            KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP
 
Boston, Massachusetts
March 21, 1996
 
                                       18
#### §§ 39.112-39.129 [Reserved]
EXHIBIT 23.1


                CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated February 7,
1997 on our audits of the consolidated financial statements and our report
dated February 7, 1997 on our audits of the financial statement schedule of
Global Marine Inc. and subsidiaries, as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and
for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994, which reports are
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, into (i) the prospectus
constituting part of the Company's Registration Statements on Form S-8
(Registration Nos. 33-32088, 33-40961 and 33-63326), respectively, for the
Global Marine Inc. 1989 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, (ii) the prospectus
constituting part of the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8
(Registration No. 33-40266) for the Global Marine Savings Incentive Plan,
(iii) the prospectus constituting part of the Company's Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-40961) for the Global Marine Inc.
1990 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, (iv) the prospectus
constituting part of the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8
(Registration No. 33-57691) for the Global Marine Inc. 1994 Non-Employee
Stock Option and Incentive Plan, and (v) the prospectus constituting part of
the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 33-58577)
for the proposed offering of up to $75,000,000 of debt securities, preferred
stock and/or common stock.



                                   /s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.  



Houston, Texas
February 26, 1997
### §1829. International monitoring and compliance

#### (a) In general

The Secretary may undertake activities to promote improved monitoring and compliance for high seas fisheries, or fisheries governed by international fishery management agreements, and to implement the requirements of this subchapter.

#### (b) Specific authorities

In carrying out subsection (a), the Secretary may—

(1) share information on harvesting and processing capacity and illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing on the high seas, in areas covered by international fishery management agreements, and by vessels of other nations within the United States exclusive economic zone, with relevant law enforcement organizations of foreign nations and relevant international organizations;

(2) further develop real time information sharing capabilities, particularly on harvesting and processing capacity and illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing;

(3) participate in global and regional efforts to build an international network for monitoring, control, and surveillance of high seas fishing and fishing under regional or global agreements;

(4) support efforts to create an international registry or database of fishing vessels, including by building on or enhancing registries developed by international fishery management organizations;

(5) enhance enforcement capabilities through the application of commercial or governmental remote sensing technology to locate or identify vessels engaged in illegal, unreported, or unregulated fishing on the high seas, including encroachments into the exclusive economic zone by fishing vessels of other nations;

(6) provide technical or other assistance to developing countries to improve their monitoring, control, and surveillance capabilities; and

(7) support coordinated international efforts to ensure that all large-scale fishing vessels operating on the high seas are required by their flag State to be fitted with vessel monitoring systems no later than December 31, 2008, or earlier if so decided by the relevant flag State or any relevant international fishery management organization.

(Pub. L. 94–265, title II, §207, as added Pub. L. 109–479, title IV, §401, Jan. 12, 2007, 120 Stat. 3625.)
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 6742

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. BRYANT SHELDON JORDAN , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro

. Thomas D. Schroeder , Chief District Judge. ( 1:07

- cr - 00207

- TDS

- 1 )

Submitted : October 14, 2021 Decided: October 19, 2021

Before DIAZ and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges , and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Bryant Sheldon Jordan, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Bryant Sheldon Jordan appeals from the district court’s order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)( 1 ) (B) motion for a sentence reduction under the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L.
No. 115

- 391, § 404, 132 Stat. 5194, 5222

. ∗ We review the district court’s decision to grant or deny a motion under the First Step Act for abuse of discretion. See United States v.
Jackson , 952 F.3d 492, 497, 502 (4th Cir. 2020). “A district court abuses its discretion when it acts arbitrarily or irrationally, fails to consider judicially recognized factors constraining its exercise of discretion, relies on erroneous factual or legal premi ses, or commits an error of law.” United States v. Dillard , 891 F.3d 151, 158 (4th Cir. 2018) (internal quotation marks omitted). We have reviewed the record and find no abuse o f
discretion . Accordingly, we affirm the district court ’s order

. We dispens e with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

∗ Although the district court granted Jordan’s motion, the reduction granted by the court did not reduce Jordan’s sentence to the full extent he requested.
Eric J. Fygi 

Deputy General Counsel 

Department of Energy 

Washington, D.C. 20585 

u.s. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

WILLIAM J. BAER 

Assistant Attorney General 

Main Justice Building 

950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20530-0001 

(202) 514-2401/ (202) 616-2645 (Fax) 

November 12,2013 

Re: Walk In Coolers & Freezers Energy Conservation Standards 

Dear Deputy General Counsel Fygi: 

I am responding to your September 10, 2013 letter seeking the views of the 

Attorney General about the potential impact on competition of proposed energy 

conservation standards for walk-in coolers and refrigerators. Your request was submitted 

under Section 325(0 )(2)(B)(i)(V) of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, as amended 

(ECPA), 42 U.S.C. 6295(0)(2)(B)(i)(V), which requires the Attorney General to make a 

determination of the impact of any lessening of competition that is likely to result from 

the imposition of proposed energy conservation standards. The Attorney General's 

responsibility for responding to requests from other departments about the effect of a 

program on competition has been delegated to the Assistant Attorney General for the 

Antitrust Division in 28 CFR § 0.40(g). 

In conducting its analysis the Antitrust Division examines whether a proposed 

standard may lessen competition, for example, by substantially limiting consumer choice, 

by placing certain manufacturers at an unjustified competitive disadvantage, or by 

inducing avoidable inefficiencies in production or distribution of particular products. A 

lessening of competition could result in higher prices to manufacturers and consumers, 

and perhaps thwart the intent of the revised standards by inducing substitution to less 

efficient products. 

We have reviewed the proposed standards contained in the Notice of Proposed 

Rulemaking (78 Fed. Reg. 55781, September 11, 2013) (NOPR). We have also reviewed 

supplementary information submitted to the Attorney General by the Department of 

Energy, including a transcript of the public meeting held on the proposed standards on 
- ---- 

October 9,2013. Based on this review, our conclusion is that the proposed energy 

conservation standards for walk-in coolers and freezers are unlikely to have a significant 

adverse impact on competition. 

Sincerely, 

c· 

/ . I 

William J. Ba~ -

Enclosure
§ 401.33 Administrative agreements. The Executive Director is authorized and directed to enter into cooperative Administrative Agreements with federal and state regulatory agencies concerned with the review of projects under federal or state law as follows: ( a ) To facilitate the submission and review of applications and the determinations required under Section 3.8 of the Compact;
( b ) To avoid unnecessary duplication of staff functions and hearings required by law; and
( c ) For such other and different purposes as he may deem feasible and advantageous for the administration of the Compact or any other law.
| Delaware                                                          |   | 000-23143               |   | 13-3379479                       |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|----------------------------------|
| (State or other jurisdictionof incorporation)                     |   | (CommissionFile Number) |   | (IRS EmployerIdentification No.) |
|                                                              |   |                    |   |                             |
| 777 Old Saw Mill River Road, Tarrytown, New York                  |   | 10591                   |
| (Address of principal executive offices)                          |   | (Zip Code)              |
| Registrant's telephone number, including area code (914) 789-2800 |

----

| Item 8.01. | Other Events. |
|------------|---------------|
| Item 9.01. | Financial Statements and Exhibits. |
|------------|------------------------------------|
| Exhibit No. | Description |
|-------------|-------------|
| 99.1   | Press Release dated April 24, 2015. |
|------------------|------------------------------------------|

----

|   | PROGENICS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. |
|--------|---------------------------------|
|   | By:                             | /s/ ANGELO W. LOVALLO, JR. |
|   |                            | Angelo W. Lovallo, Jr. |
|   |                            | Vice President - Finance & Treasurer |
|   |                            | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
### SUBCHAPTER CX—CITY OF ROCKS NATIONAL RESERVE
§ 740.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) In recognition of the role of the States as the focal point for the management of water and related land resources, this part establishes guidelines for financial and program assistance to States for water management planning programs which address each State's particular needs, which are based on established State goals and objectives, and which take into consideration national goals and objectives.
( b ) The purpose of the State Water Management Planning Program (Program) is to provide financial and program assistance to participating States to support the development and modification of comprehensive water management planning programs.
( c ) Funds made available under this part shall be used to establish, develop or enhance existing or proposed State water resources management and planning programs that are designed to address pertinent State and national goals and objectives, as well as the goals and objectives of Title III of the Water Resources Planning Act (Act), Pub. L. 89-80, as amended, by addressing in the Program the following: ( 1 ) Coordination of the program authorized by the Act and those related programs of other Federal agencies;
( 2 ) Integration of water conservation with State water management planning;
( 3 ) Integration of water quantity and water quality planning;
( 4 ) Integration of ground and surface water planning;
( 5 ) Planning for protection and management of groundwater supplies;
( 6 ) Planning for protection and management of instream values; and
( 7 ) Enhanced cooperation and coordination between Federal, regional State and local governmental entities involved in water and related land resources planning and management.
### §19jj–1. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, Pub. L. 101–337, §2, July 27, 1990, 104 Stat. 379; Pub. L. 104–333, div. I, title VIII, §814(h)(3), Nov. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 4199; Pub. L. 106–176, title I, §120(c), Mar. 10, 2000, 114 Stat. 29, related to liability. See section 100722 of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.
§ 2.205 Confidentiality of supervised release records. ( a ) Consistent with the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C 552a(b)), the contents of supervised release records shall be confidential and shall not be disclosed outside the Commission and CSOSA (or the U.S. Probation Office) except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section.
( b ) Information pertaining to a releasee may be disclosed to the general public, without the consent of the releasee, as authorized by § 2.37.
( c ) Information other than as described in § 2.37 may be disclosed without the consent of the releasee only pursuant to the provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a(b)) and the implementing rules of the Commission or CSOSA, as applicable.
Exhibit 99.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Whitemark Homes, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kenneth "Larry"
White, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



/S/ KENNETH "LARRY" WHITE
-------------------------
Kenneth "Larry" White
President

Date: May 19, 2003
      ------------
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 911 

To require the installation of secondary cockpit barriers on existing aircraft, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 27, 2019 

Mr. CASEY (for himself and Mr. TOOMEY) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 

Transportation 

A BILL 

To require the installation of secondary cockpit barriers on 

existing aircraft, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Saracini Enhanced 

5 Aviation Safety Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INSTALLATION OF SECONDARY COCKPIT BARRIERS 

7 ON EXISTING AIRCRAFT. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 18 months after 

9 the date of the enactment of this Act, the Administrator 

10 of the Federal Aviation Administration shall issue an 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 911 IS

1 order requiring installation of a secondary cockpit barrier 

2 on each covered aircraft. 

3 (b) COVERED AIRCRAFT.—In this section, the term 

4 ‘‘covered aircraft’’ means a commercial passenger aircraft 

5 operating under the provisions of part 121 of title 14, 

6 Code of Federal Regulations. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
86° eae

46°

==

aac

2.54

(1.70)

ae

Location and value of Devonian %Ro(mean) sample (this report)—
Single asterisk indicates that the sample had an anomalously low
value and was not contoured; double asterisk indicates that the
sample had an anomalously high value and was not contoured

Location and value of Devonian %Ro(mean) Sample—Data from
Streib (1981). Double asterisk indicates that the sample had an
anomalously high value and was not contoured

Devonian %Roimean) isograd (this report)—Dashed where inferred;
hachured to indicate isograd depression

Thrust fault—Sawteeth on upper plate

Gas fields (and, in Ohio only, local oil fields) of the Oriskany
Sandstone (Early Devonian)—Data from Flaherty (1996), Harper
and Patchen (1996), Opritza (1996), and Patchen and Harper
(1996)

Oil fields of Late to Middle Devonian age—Locally found in
west-central West Virginia and adjoining Ohio. Data from
Baranoski and others (1988) and Hohn and Timberlake (1988)

Shale-gas fields of Late to Middle Devonian age—Data from
Hunter and Young (1953), Milici (1993, 1996), and Boswell (1996)

EXPLANATION

Te) ‘

oA %Rotmean) Values for selected wells in Virginia—Increasing depth

left foxight; mean value used for isograds

A: 1.11)4.10, 1.14, 1.19, 1.34; mean = 1.18
B: 1.29, 1.31; mean = 1.30

C: 1.37, 1.2Y; mean = 1.32

D: 1.76, 1.75; mean = 1.75

E: 1.61'1.91;\mean = 1.76

F: 1.92, 1.85,\1.99, 1.92, 1.95, 2.00, 1.90; mean =1.93
G: 1.42, 1.46; ean = 1.44

H: 1.10, 1.12; Inean

|: 0.97, 1.03; mean

J: 0.97, 1.03; mean = 1.

L: 0.60, 0.60, 0.62, 0.66; mean = 0.62

M: 1.93, 1.91, 1.98, 1.97; mean = 1.95

N: 1.49, 1.57, 1.64, 1.60; mean = 1.58

P: 2.31, 2.36, 2.50, 2.58, 2.67, 2.66; mean = 2.51

Q: 2.22, 2.25, 2.19; mean = 2.22

R: 2.86, 3.02, 291\ mean = 2.93

T: 2.45, 2.78, 2.71,\2.89; mean = 2.70

_—

a
f 90538

“aon ce /
} 05s |

‘ Sea
y -
Wayne-
-t-- 4 "bund Tela

°0.77

Steuben

lose"
Potter 0.58"

1
\ Teidy),

>
field =

-—ae-N a, \

_ + Punxsutawrley- 2.54 \

| \Driftwood field can °

ameron 2.22

| ek) \\Z ont ak

2 wa /

7

Clinton.
2.29% ~

12.05 / 5
08, 4

00-43}
| egtteo al
i

0.35 |- __
1

i.
|
——|

| qu Guernsey
ef
OAS Nes 0.45%
4. 4
Cambridge
field

o 61 eae 45 WD
Lr of
1 0. ee

- | Big Sandy
an y | Sield 0.72R

25

50

75

100 MILES
J

eso

50

100

T
150 KILOMETERS

80° 78°

Figure 11.—Devonian vitrinite reflectance (%Ro(mean)) isograds superimposed on oil and gas fields in Lower Devonian Oriskany Sandstone and Devonian shale reservoirs.

74"
§ 706.212 Miscellaneous statutory provisions. The attention of each employee is directed to the following statutory provisions: ( a ) House Concurrent Resolution 175, 85th Congress, 2d Session, 72 Stat. B12, the Code of Ethics for Government Service.
( b ) Chapter 11 of Title 18, United States Code, relating to bribery, graft and conflicts of interest.
( c ) The prohibition against lobbying with appropriated funds (18 U.S.C. 1913).
( d ) The prohibitions against disloyalty and striking (E.O. 10450, 18 U.S.C. 1918).
( e ) The prohibition against the employment of a member of a Communist organization (50 U.S.C. 784).
( f ) The prohibitions against: ( 1 ) The disclosure of classified information (18 U.S.C. 798, 50 U.S.C. 783); and
( 2 ) The disclosure of confidential information (18 U.S.C. 1905).
( g ) The provision relating to the habitual use of intoxicants to excess (5 U.S.C. 7352).
( h ) The prohibition against the misuse of a Government vehicle (31 U.S.C. 638a(c)).
( i ) The prohibition against the misuse of the franking privilege (18 U.S.C. 1719).
( j ) The prohibition against the use of deceit in an examination or personnel action in connection with Government employment (18 U.S.C. 1917).
( k ) The prohibition against fraud or false statements in a Government matter (18 U.S.C. 1001).
( l ) The prohibition against mutilating or destroying a public record (18 U.S.C. 2071).
( m ) The prohibition against counterfeiting and forging transportation requests (18 U.S.C. 508).
( n ) The prohibitions against: ( 1 ) Embezzlement of Government money or property (18 U.S.C. 641);
( 2 ) Failing to account for public money (18 U.S.C. 643); and
( 3 ) Embezzlement of the money or property of another person in the possession of an employee by reason of his employment (18 U.S.C. 654).
( o ) The prohibition against unauthorized use of documents relating to claims from or by the Government (18 U.S.C. 285).
( p ) The prohibitions against political activities in Subchapter III of Chapter 73 of Title 5, United States Code and 18 U.S.C. 602, 603, 607, and 608.
( q ) The provision relating to the denial of the right to petition Congress (5 U.S.C. 7102).
( r ) The prohibition against an employee acting as the agent of a foreign principal registered under the Foreign Agents Registration Act (18 U.S.C. 219).
( s ) The prohibition against a public official appointing or promoting a relative, or advocating such an appointment or promotion (5 U.S.C. 3110).
( t ) The prohibition against the employment of an individual convicted of felonious rioting or related offenses (5 U.S.C. 7313).
( u ) The tax imposed on certain employees (e.g., Presidential appointees, employees excepted under Schedule C, employees in GS-16 or above, or a comparable pay level) who knowingly engage in self-dealing with a private foundation (26 U.S.C. 4941, 4946). “Self-dealing” is defined in the statute to include certain transactions involving an employee's receipt of pay, a loan, or reimbursement for travel or other expenses from, or his sale to or purchase of property from a private foundation.