alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §37a. Definitions

For purposes of this section and section 37 of this title:

#### (1) Antitrust laws

The term "antitrust laws" has the meaning given it in subsection (a) of section 12 of this title, except that such term includes section 45 of this title to the extent that such section 45 applies to unfair methods of competition.

#### (2) Charitable remainder trust

The term "charitable remainder trust" has the meaning given it in section 664(d) of title 26.

#### (3) Charitable gift annuity

The term "charitable gift annuity" has the meaning given it in section 501(m)(5) of title 26.

#### (4) Final determination

The term "final determination" includes an Internal Revenue Service determination, after exhaustion of donor's and donee's administrative remedies, disallowing the donor's charitable deduction for the year in which the initial contribution was made because of the donee's failure to comply at such time with the requirements of section 501(m)(5) or 664(d), respectively, of title 26.

#### (5) Person

The term "person" has the meaning given it in subsection (a) of section 12 of this title.

#### (6) State

The term "State" has the meaning given it in section 15g(2) of this title.

(Pub. L. 104–63, §3, Dec. 8, 1995, 109 Stat. 687; Pub. L. 105–26, §2(2), July 3, 1997, 111 Stat. 242.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1997—Pars. (1), (2). Pub. L. 105–26, §2(2)(A)–(C), added par. (2), redesignated former par. (2) as (1), and struck out heading and text of former par. (1). Text read as follows: "The term 'annuity rate' means the percentage of the fair market value of a gift (determined as of the date of the gift) given in exchange for a charitable gift annuity, that represents the amount of the annual payment to be made to 1 or 2 annuitants over the life of either or both under the terms of the agreement to give such gift in exchange for such annuity."

Pars. (4) to (6). Pub. L. 105–26, §2(2)(D), (E), added par. (4) and redesignated former pars. (4) and (5) as (5) and (6), respectively.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1997 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 105–26 applicable with respect to all conduct occurring before, on, or after July 3, 1997, and applicable in all administrative and judicial actions pending on or commenced after July 3, 1997, see section 3 of Pub. L. 105–26, set out as a note under section 37 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section applicable with respect to conduct occurring before, on, or after Dec. 8, 1995, see section 4 of Pub. L. 104–63, set out as a note under section 37 of this title.
#### In the Matter of John Monahan, Petitioner, v John J. Doherty, as Commissioner of the New York City Department of Sanitation, Respondent.

[824 NYS2d 290]

Determination of respondent, dated November 16, 2004, which found petitioner guilty of specified misconduct and dismissed him from service, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the CFLR article 78 proceeding (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Nicholas Figueroa, J.], entered August 3, 2005) dismissed, without costs.

The determination was supported by substantial evidence *(Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70*NY2d 436, 443-444 [1987]; *see also People ex rel. Vega v Smith,*66 NY2d 130 [1985]) that petitioner was guilty of misconduct when he negligently operated a department truck, violated sick leave and lateness regulations, and was insubordinate to a supervisor *(see Matter of Wallace v Department of Sanitation of City of N.Y.,*303 AD2d 295*347[2003]). The Administrative Law Judge properly rejected petitioner’s various excuses and explanations. The penalty of dismissal was not disproportionate to the offenses and does not shock the conscience (see *Matter of Kelly v Safir,*96 NY2d 32, 39-40 [2001]), particularly in view of petitioner’s disciplinary record, which included several prior suspensions (see *Matter of Cantres v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp.,*30 AD3d 164 [2006]).

We have considered and rejected petitioner’s remaining arguments. Concur—Tom, J.E, Andrias, Saxe, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Daniel R. Luis, certify that: 

1.            I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of GoAmerica, Inc.; 

2.            Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.            Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.            The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

               (a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

               (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

               (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.            The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

               (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

               (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: November 14, 2008
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Gentlecare Ambulatory Anesthesia Services; Lyonel F. Paul, M.D., as Assignee of Bonitto, Okang, Appellant,<br><br>against<br><br>GEICO Ins. Co., Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell of counsel), for appellant.Rivkin Radler, LLP (Cheryl F. Korman, Henry Mascia and Stuart M. Bodoff of counsel), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Terrence C. O'Connor, J.), entered October 16, 2015. The order denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and granted defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff moved for summary judgment, and defendant cross-moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff had failed to appear for duly scheduled examinations under oath. Plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which denied plaintiff's motion and granted defendant's cross motion.</p><p>For the reasons stated in<i> Gentlecare Ambulatory Anesthesia Servs. etc., as Assignee of Saint-Louis, Lydia v GEICO Ins. Co.</i> (__ Misc 3d ___, 2018 NY Slip Op _____ [appeal No. 2015-1996 K C], decided herewith), the order is affirmed.</p><p>PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.</p><br><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: June 08, 2018<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
§ 115.282 Access to emergency medical and mental health services. ( a ) Resident victims of sexual abuse shall receive timely, unimpeded access to emergency medical treatment and crisis intervention services, the nature and scope of which are determined by medical and mental health practitioners according to their professional judgment.
( b ) If no qualified medical or mental health practitioners are on duty at the time a report of recent abuse is made, security staff first responders shall take preliminary steps to protect the victim pursuant to § 115.262 and shall immediately notify the appropriate medical and mental health practitioners.
( c ) Resident victims of sexual abuse while incarcerated shall be offered timely information about and timely access to emergency contraception and sexually transmitted infections prophylaxis, in accordance with professionally accepted standards of care, where medically appropriate.
( d ) Treatment services shall be provided to the victim without financial cost and regardless of whether the victim names the abuser or cooperates with any investigation arising out of the incident.
Wash Your Hands!

Dirty! Wet

 Get Soap

Scrub Rinse

Dry Clean! www.cdc.gov/handwashing CS267057-A
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 53 (Friday, March 18, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14970-14971]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6423]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Update to Notice of Financial Institutions for Which the Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation Has Been Appointed Either Receiver, 
Liquidator, or Manager

AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

ACTION: Update listing of financial institutions in liquidation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation (Corporation) has been appointed the sole receiver for the 
following financial institutions effective as of the Date Closed as 
indicated in the listing. This list (as updated from time to time in 
the Federal Register) may be relied upon as ``of record'' notice that 
the Corporation has been appointed receiver for purposes of the 
statement of policy published in the July 2, 1992 issue of the Federal 
Register (57 FR 29491). For further information concerning the 
identification of any institutions which have been placed in 
liquidation, please visit the Corporation Web site at http://www.fdic.gov/bank/individual/failed/banklist.html or contact the 
Manager of Receivership Oversight in the appropriate service center.

    Dated: March 14, 2011.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Pamela Johnson,
Regulatory Editing Specialist.

                                           Institutions in Liquidation
                                             [In alphabetical order]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       FDIC Ref. No.                  Bank name                    City                State        Date closed
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10349......................  First National Bank of       Davis.................  OK                   3/11/2011
                              Davis.
10348......................  Legacy Bank................  Milwaukee.............  WI                   3/11/2011
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2011-6423 Filed 3-17-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6741-01-P
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 49 (Monday, March 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 13668]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5647]

[[Page 13668]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-73,644]

Cinram Manufacturing, LLC, a Subsidiary of Cinram International, 
Including On-Site Leased Workers From Onesource Staffing Solutions and 
Canteen, Division of Compass Group, Olyphant, PA; Amended Certification 
Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(``Act''), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a 
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance 
on July 16, 2010, applicable to workers of Cinram Manufacturing, LLC, a 
subsidiary of Cinram International, including on-site leased workers 
from OneSource Staffing Solutions, Olyphant, Pennsylvania. The workers 
are engaged in employment related to the production of optical media 
devices (DVDs, CDs, and Blu-ray discs)produce decorative metal products 
for appliances. The notice was published in the Federal Register on 
August 2, 2010 (75 FR 45162).
    At the request of a petitioner, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The company reports that 
workers leased from Canteen, a division of Compass Group were employed 
on-site at the Olyphant, Pennsylvania location of Cinram Manufacturing, 
LLC. The Department has determined that these workers were sufficiently 
under the control of Cinram Manufacturing, LLC to be considered leased 
workers.
    Based on these findings, the Department is amending this 
certification to include workers leased from Canteen, a division of 
Compass Group working on-site at the Olyphant, Pennsylvania location of 
Cinram Manufacturing, LLC.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-73,644 is hereby issued as 
follows:

All workers of Cinram Manufacturing, LLC, a subsidiary of Cinram 
International, including on-site leased workers from OneSource 
Staffing Solutions and Canteen, a division of Compass Group, 
Olyphant, Pennsylvania, who became totally or partially separated 
from employment on or after March 4, 2009, through July 16, 2012, 
and all workers in the group threatened with total or partial 
separation from employment on the date of certification through two 
years from the date of certification, are eligible to apply for 
adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act 
of 1974, as amended.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 24th day of February 2011.
Michael W. Jaffe,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011-5647 Filed 3-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
```
CSAT FOLLOW-UP MEETING SATISFACTION SURVEY
 

v2.0 
 

 

 

 

 

 

Form Approved 

OMB NO. 0930-0197 

Exp. Date 01/31/2014 

Public reporting burden for this collection of information 

is estimated to average 10 minutes per response to 

complete this questionnaire. Send comments regarding this 

burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of 

information to the SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer, 

Room 7-1045, 1 Choke Cherry Road, Rockville, MD 

20850. An agency may not conduct or sponsor and a 

person is not required to respond to a collection of 

CENTER FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT information unless it displays a currently valid OMB 

control number. The control number for this project is 

0930-0197. 

Customer Survey - Meeting Follow-up 

Personal ID code, date of meeting, location (i.e., city, state), and topic will be pre-coded and entered in this 

area of the form. 

Please check here ( ) if you have received this survey in error, (i.e., you did not attend the meeting listed 

above) and return the uncompleted survey in the enclosed postage-paid envelope. 

PLEASE BASE YOUR ANSWER ON HOW YOU FEEL 

ABOUT THE SESSION NOW. 

1. How satisfied are you with the overall quality of the meeting? 

Very 

Satisfied

1 

Satisfied

2 

Neutral

3 

Dissatisfied 

4 

Very 

Dissatisfied 

5 

2. How satisfied are you with the quality of the 

information/instruction? 

1 2 3 4 5 

3. How satisfied are you with the quality of the meeting 

materials? 

1 2 3 4 5 

4. How satisfied are you that the meeting was relevant to 

substance abuse treatment? 

1 2 3 4 5 

5. Overall, how satisfied are you with your meeting experience? 1 2 3 4 5 

PLEASE INDICATE YOUR AGREEMENT WITH THESE 

STATEMENTS ABOUT THE MEETING. 

Strongly Strongly 

Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Disagree 

6. The material presented in the meeting has been useful to me in 1 2 3 4 5 

consensus building. 

7. The meeting enhanced my skills in this topic area. 1 2 3 4 5 

8. The meeting was relevant to my career. 1 2 3 4 5 

9. The meeting has enabled me to serve my clients better. 1 2 3 4 5 

10. The meeting was relevant to substance abuse treatment. 1 2 3 4 5 

11. I would recommend the meeting to a colleague. 1 2 3 4 5 

12. I would take additional meeting from CSAT. 1 2 3 4 5 

v2.0 
 

 

 

 

CENTER FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT 

Customer Survey – Meeting Follow-up 

Very Not 

Useful Useful Neutral Useless Applicable 

13. How useful was the information you received during the 1 2 3 4 5 

meeting? 

Yes No 

14. Did you share any of the information from the meeting with others? 1 2 

15. Did you share any of the materials from the meeting with others? 1 2 

16. Have you applied any of what you learned in the meeting to your work? 1 2 

What about the meeting was most useful in supporting your work responsibilities? 

How can we improve our meetings? 

Thank you for completing our survey. 

Please return your survey in the enclosed reply envelope. 

v2.0
### _____________

AMERIFLIGHT, LLC

4700 EMPIRE AVENUE
HANGAR #1 BURBANK, CA 91505 (818) 847-0000 PETITION FOR RENEWAL OF AMERIFLIGHT, LLC EXEMPTION 8396

This petition follows the requi rements for inclusion in such documents set forth in the order presented in 14 CFR Part 11.81

(a) Your name and mailing address and, if you wis h, other contact information such as a fax number, telephone num ber, or e-mail address;

Mr. Andrew Lotter

President Ameriflight, LLC 4700 Empire Avenue, Hangar One Burbank, CA 91505

818-847-0000 alotter@ameriflight.com

(b) The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek an exemption;

14 CFR Part 135.85

(c) The extent of relief you seek, and the reason you seek the relief;

To allow Ameriflight and its p ilots to transport FAA-certif ied airmen who are employed as flight crewmembers by another Part 121 or 135 certificate holder without complying with certain Part 135 passenger-carrying requirem ents. This is a renew al of Ameriflight exemption 8396.

(d) The reasons why granting your request would be in the public intere st; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole;

There is no change to public interest since last renewal.

(e) The reasons why granting the exemption w ould not adversely affect safety, or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek the exemption;

There is no change to the safety aspects since last renewal.

(f) A summary we can publish in the Federal Register, stating:

### _____________

AMERIFLIGHT, LLC

4700 EMPIRE AVENUE
HANGAR #1 BURBANK, CA 91505 (818) 847-0000 (1) The rule from which you seek the exemption;

14 CFR Part 135.85

(2) A brief description of the nat ure of the exemption you seek;

To allow Ameriflight and its p ilots to transport FAA-certif ied airmen who are employed as flight crewmembers by another Part 121 or 135 certificate holder without complying with certain Part 135 passenger-carrying requirem ents. This is a renew al of Ameriflight exemption 8396.

(g) Any additional information, views or arguments available to support your request;

No additional support since last renewal.

(h) If you want to exercise the privileges of your exemption outsi de the United States, the reason why you need to do so.

Yes
Exhibit 23.1

                        Consent of Independent Auditors
                        -------------------------------


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-3  No.  33-97054)  of  Manhattan  Bagel  Company,  Inc.  and  in  the  related
Prospectus,  in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-15587) of Manhattan
Bagel Company, Inc. and in the related Prospectus, in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No.  33-93764)  pertaining  to the 1994 Stock Option Plan of Manhattan
Bagel Company,  Inc., in  the  Registration  Statement  (Form S-8 No. 333-15393)
pertaining to Amendment No. 1 to the Stock Option  Agreement made as of April 1,
1996 between Manhattan Bagel Company,  Inc. and CRC, Inc., as amended and in the
Registration  Statement  (Form S-8 No.  333-15577)  pertaining to the 1996 Stock
Option Plan of Manhattan Bagel Company, Inc. of our report dated April 24, 1998,
with  respect  to the  consolidated  financial  statements  of  Manhattan  Bagel
Company,  Inc. and  subsidiaries  included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended December 31, 1997.

                                        /s/ Ernst & Young, LLP
                                        ----------------------------------

Princeton, New Jersey
April __, 1998
### §3640. Administrative matters

#### (a) Compensation of Commissioners and Alternate Commissioners

Commissioners and Alternate Commissioners who are not State or Federal employees shall receive compensation at the daily rate of GS–18 of the General Schedule when engaged in the actual performance of duties for the United States Section or for the Commission.

#### (b) Compensation of Panel Members and Alternate Panel Members

Panel Members and Alternate Panel Members who are not State or Federal employees shall receive compensation at the daily rate of GS–16 of the General Schedule when engaged in the actual performance of duties for the United States Section or for the Commission.

#### (c) Travel; other expenses

Travel and other necessary expenses shall be paid for all United States Commissioners, Alternate Commissioners, Panel Members, Alternate Panel Members, members of the Joint Technical Committee, and members of the Advisory Committee when engaged in the actual performance of duties for the United States Section or for the Commission.

#### (d) Individuals not considered Federal employees

Except for officials of the United States Government, such individuals shall not be considered to be Federal employees while engaged in the actual performance of duties for the United States Section or for the Commission, except for the purposes of injury compensation or tort claims liability as provided in chapter 81 of title 5 and chapter 71 1 of title 28.

(Pub. L. 99–5, §11, Mar. 15, 1985, 99 Stat. 14.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### References in Other Laws to GS–16, 17, or 18 Pay Rates

References in laws to the rates of pay for GS–16, 17, or 18, or to maximum rates of pay under the General Schedule, to be considered references to rates payable under specified sections of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, see section 529 [title I, §101(c)(1)] of Pub. L. 101–509, set out in a note under section 5376 of Title 5.

1 So in original. Probably should be chapter "171".