IPCC Secretariat

c/o WMO

· 7 bis, Avenue de la Paix

· C.P: 2300

· CH

- 1211 Geneva 2

· Switzerlan d

telephone +41 22 730 8208 / 54 / 84

· fax +41 22 730 8025 / 13

· email IPCC

- Sec@wmo.int

· www.ipcc.ch PRESS RELEASE

Scientific Academy to Conduct Independent Review of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s Processes and Procedures at Request of United Nations and

IPCC

Geneva, Switzerland

– March 10, 2010

– The United Nations Secretary Gener al and the Chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) announced today that they asked the InterAcademy Council (IAC) to conduct an independent review of the IPCC’s processes and procedures to further strengthen the quality of the Pane l’s reports on climate change. The IAC is the umbrella organization for various national academies of science

from countries around the world.

The review will examine every aspect of how the IPCC’s reports are prepared, including the

use of non

- peer revi ewed literature and the reflection of diverse viewpoints. The review will also examine institutional aspects, including management functions as well as the panel’s procedures for communicating its findings with the public.

“The IPCC’s mandate is to provid e objective scientific assessments for decision

- makers,” said IPCC Chairman Rajendra Pachauri, Ph.D. “The IPCC stands firmly behind the rigor and reliability of its Fourth Assessment Report from 2007, but we recognize that we can improve. We have listened and learned from our critics, and we intend to take every action we can to ensure that our reports are as robust as possible.”

UN Secretary General Ban Ki

- moon and Dr. Pachauri formally requested the IAC to conduct the review after the proposal to carry out the review was communicated to IPCC member governments. The decision to engage the IAC was supported by the Executive Director of UNEP and the Secretary General of WMO.

“I am very grateful to the Secretary General’s unwavering support, not only in jo intly requesting the IAC to undertake this review, but for his steadfast support of the IPCC and climate change science,” Dr. Pachauri said.

Christopher Field, Ph.D., Co

- chair of IPCC Working Group II, said: “We expect the

recommendations from the IAC’s review to inform how the IPCC prepares its fifth major assessment of global climate change, due to be published in 2013

- 2014. Meanwhile, the conclusions from the IPCC’s 2007 report remain entirely valid: The climate is changing due to human activity, and the effects are already being felt around the globe. If anything, more recent data indicate that the IPCC’s 2007 assessment underestimated the degree to which human activity is changing our climate.”

Dr. Field is also founding director of the Carnegie In stitution's Department of Global Ecology, professor of biological sciences at Stanford University and faculty director of Stanford's Jasper Ridge Biological Preserve.- 2

- The review will be led by the IAC co

- chairs Robbert Dijkgraaf, Ph.D., president of the R oyal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Science, and Professor Lu Yongxiang, president of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. The IAC will conduct its work independently according to its procedures for carrying out expert studies. The international experts who serve on IAC studies are not paid for their participation and are pro bono volunteers.

A copy of the IPCC’s correspondence to the IAC requesting the review and outlining the scope of work can be found at www.ipcc.ch

.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change The IPCC is an interdisciplinary and intergovernmental body comprised of more than 190 participating countries. It mobilizes scientific experts from around the world to carry out assessments of global climate science based on the available relevant literature.

Thousands of scientists from all over the world contribute to the IPCC reports without receiving payment for their work. The members of the IPCC Bureau, including the IPCC Chair, serve in their exper t capacity and are not paid by the IPCC. Rigorous review is an essential part of the process, broadening the set of individuals contributing and ensuring an objective and comprehensive assessment of current information.

For the IPCC Fourth Assessment Rep ort, released in 2007, 450 scientists from 130

countries served as lead authors. Another 800 served as contributing authors. More than 2,500 experts provided more than 90,000 review comments.

The InterAcademy Council

The 18

- member InterAcademy Council B oard is composed of presidents of 15 academies of science and equivalent organizations representing Argentina, Australia, Brazil, China, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Japan, South Africa, Turkey, the United Kingdom, and

the United States.

It also inc ludes the African Academy of Sciences and the Academy of Sciences for the Developing World (TWAS) as well as representatives of the InterAcademy Panel (IAP) of scientific academies, the International Council of Academies of Engineering and Technological Sc iences (CAETS), and the InterAcademy Medical Panel (IAMP) of medical

academies.

The IAC Secretariat is hosted by the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences in

Amsterdam.

Contacts:

IPCC Secretariat

Tel: +41 22 730 8208/8254/8284

Fax: +41 22 730 8025/8013

Email: IPCC

- Media@wmo.int

Website: http://www.ipcc.ch