alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [File No. 500-1]

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Admiralty Holding Co. because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended September 30, 2006.

                    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of American Consolidated Management Group, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic                           ( print page 13697)                        reports since the period ended March 31, 2006.                

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of DnC Multimedia Corp. because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended December 31, 2007.

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Dorsey Trailers, Inc. (n/k/a DT Liquidation, Inc.) because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended July 1, 2000.

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of ElectraCapital, Inc. (a/k/a Electra Capital, Inc.) because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended September 30, 2003.

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed companies. Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of the above-listed companies is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EST on March 10, 2011, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on March 23, 2011.

By the Commission.

Jill M. Peterson,

Assistant Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2011-5934 Filed 3-10-11; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 859 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 859

  To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to reauthorize hydroelectric 
    production incentives and hydroelectric efficiency improvement 
                  incentives, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 25, 2019

  Mr. Gardner introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to reauthorize hydroelectric 
    production incentives and hydroelectric efficiency improvement 
                  incentives, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reliable Investment in Vital Energy 
Reauthorization Act'' or the ``RIVER Act''.

SEC. 2. HYDROELECTRIC PRODUCTION INCENTIVES AND EFFICIENCY 
              IMPROVEMENTS.

    (a) Hydroelectric Production Incentives.--Section 242 of the Energy 
Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 15881) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (c), by striking ``10'' and inserting 
        ``22'';
            (2) in subsection (e)(2), by striking ``section 
        29(d)(2)(B)'' and inserting ``section 45K(d)(2)(B)'';
            (3) in subsection (f), by striking ``20'' and inserting 
        ``32''; and
            (4) in subsection (g), by striking ``each of the fiscal 
        years 2006 through 2015'' and inserting ``each of fiscal years 
        2019 through 2036''.
    (b) Hydroelectric Efficiency Improvement.--Section 243(c) of the 
Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 15882(c)) is amended by striking 
``each of the fiscal years 2006 through 2015'' and inserting ``each of 
fiscal years 2019 through 2036''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2



Section 1350 Certification

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of MK Resources Company (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John C. Farmer, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ John C. Farmer                   
|John C. Farmer                       
|Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
|May 16, 2005
§ 201.6 Applications for review. ( a ) A complainant may apply for review by the DPRC of a determination made by the ODNI CLPO in response to a qualifying complaint submitted by the complainant by filing an application for review with the appropriate public authority in a qualifying state, for forwarding to OPCL, no later than sixty (60) days after the date, as reported to OPCL by the appropriate public authority in a qualifying state, on which the complainant receives notification that the ODNI CLPO has completed its review.
( b ) The complainant shall submit with the application for review, through the appropriate authority in a qualifying state, any information, including argument on questions of law or the application of law to the facts, that the complainant wishes to provide to the DPRC. The complainant may be represented by counsel in submitting this information. OPCL shall maintain the confidentiality of such information.
( c ) An element of the Intelligence Community may apply for review by the DPRC of a determination made by the ODNI CLPO by filing an application for review with OPCL no later than sixty (60) days after the date on which the element of the Intelligence Community receives notification from the ODNI CPLO that the ODNI CLPO has completed its review of the qualifying complaint. An application for review filed by an element of the Intelligence Community may include any information that the element of the Intelligence Community wishes to provide to the DPRC, including argument on questions of law or the application of law to the facts. To prevent the disclosure of classified or otherwise privileged or protected information, the DPRC, Special Advocates, and OPCL shall not provide to the complainant any information relating to the existence, review, or outcome of any application for review filed by an element of the Intelligence Community.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 194 (Friday, October 5, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 60970]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-24746]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: Vol. 77, No. 188, 
Thursday, September 27, 2012, page 593898.

ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF OPEN MEETING: 10 a.m.-12 p.m., Wednesday 
October 30, 2012.

CHANGES TO OPEN MEETING AGENDA: 

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Briefing: Infant Swings.

ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE AGENDA: Decisional Matters: 1. Bassinets and 
Cradles--Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; 2. Consideration of 
Opportunities to Reduce Third Party Testing Costs Consistent with 
Assuring the Compliance of Children's Products.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of 
the Secretary, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814 (301) 504-
7923.

    Dated: October 3, 2012.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-24746 Filed 10-3-12; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
From: Adams, Kevin (OSD 

Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 9:52AM 

To: supvleimgruber@co.imperial.ca.us; Cheryl Walker (Cheryi.Walker@Rabobank.com); El Centro Mayor, Jon Edney 

Cc: Brad Rawson (brad.rawson@skywest.com); Carrier, SkyWest, Michael Thompson; Tim Sieber 

(tsieber@seaportair.com); Carrier, Sovereign Air, Bob Karns; Devany, Dennis (OST) 

Subject: Request for Comment regarding Proposals of SkyWest, SeaPort, and Sovereign at El Centro/Imperial, California 

Hi All, 

Attached above are copies of the three timely-filed proposals for Essential Air Service (EAS) at El Centro/Imperial, 

California. We are currently reviewing those proposals. These proposals are directly from the carrier and are reflected 

in the Docket, which you may access through Regulations.gov at DOT-OST-2008-0299, along with other pertinent 

information on this proceeding. Community comments are a critically important element in our carrier selection 

decision. We ask that you get back to us, preferably by email, no later than November 6, 2012. We will docket this 

email, as well as any replies. 

In brief, look at the proposals, and if you have any questions, call any of the three carriers or me, and get back to us by 

the deadline. 

Best, 

Kevin Adams 

202-366-1047 

1
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Service Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dana S. Philbrook, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and
Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-B (Item 601(b)(32)) promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Securities Act) and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act). In accordance with clause (ii) of
Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ DANA S. PHILBROOK  
|Dana S. Philbrook      
|Chief Financial Officer
|                       
|November 10, 2004
### §1403. Committee of Scientific Advisors on Marine Mammals

#### (a) Establishment; membership

The Commission shall establish, within ninety days after its establishment, a Committee of Scientific Advisors on Marine Mammals (hereafter referred to in this subchapter as the "Committee"). Such Committee shall consist of nine scientists knowledgeable in marine ecology and marine mammal affairs appointed by the Chairman after consultation with the Chairman of the Council on Environmental Quality, the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution, the Director of the National Science Foundation, and the Chairman of the National Academy of Sciences.

#### (b) Compensation; reimbursement for travel expenses

Except for United States Government employees, members of the Committee shall each be compensated at a rate equal to the daily equivalent of the rate for GS–18 of the General Schedule under section 5332 of title 5, for each day such member is engaged in the actual performance of duties vested in the Committee. Each member shall be reimbursed for travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, as authorized by section 5703 of title 5 for persons in Government service employed intermittently.

#### (c) Consultation with Commission on studies and recommendations; explanation for nonadoption

The Commission shall consult with the Committee on all studies and recommendations which it may propose to make or has made, on research programs conducted or proposed to be conducted under the authority of this chapter, and on all applications for permits for scientific research. Any recommendations made by the Committee or any of its members which are not adopted by the Commission shall be transmitted by the Commission to the appropriate Federal agency and to the appropriate committees of Congress with a detailed explanation of the Commission's reasons for not accepting such recommendations.

(Pub. L. 92–522, title II, §203, Oct. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 1044.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective upon the expiration of the sixty-day period following Oct. 21, 1972, see section 4 of Pub. L. 92–522, set out as a note under section 1361 of this title.

#### Termination of Advisory Committees

Advisory committees in existence on Jan. 5, 1973, to terminate not later than the expiration of the 2-year period following Jan. 5, 1973, unless, in the case of a committee established by the President or an officer of the Federal Government, such committee is renewed by appropriate action prior to the expiration of such 2-year period, or in the case of a committee established by the Congress, its duration is otherwise provided for by law. See section 1013 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### References in Other Laws to GS–16, 17, or 18 Pay Rates

References in laws to the rates of pay for GS–16, 17, or 18, or to maximum rates of pay under the General Schedule, to be considered references to rates payable under specified sections of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, see section 529 [title I, §101(c)(1)] of Pub. L. 101–509, set out in a note under section 5376 of Title 5.
### §649d. Central information clearinghouse

The Secretary through the International Trade Administration, shall, only to such extent and in such amounts as are provided in appropriation Acts on and after October 1, 1980, maintain a central clearinghouse to provide for the collection, dissemination, and exchange of information between programs established pursuant to sections 649a and 649b of this title, the Office of International Trade of the Small Business Administration, and other interested concerns.

(Pub. L. 96–481, title III, §304, Oct. 21, 1980, 94 Stat. 2333.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Small Business Act which comprises this chapter.
### §1j. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, Pub. L. 110–229, title III, §301, May 8, 2008, 122 Stat. 768, related to cooperative agreements for national park natural resource protection. Subsecs. (a) to (c) were repealed and restated in section 101702(d) of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs. Subsec. (d) authorized appropriations to carry out this section.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

April 29, 2013

t0422

Order 

April 29, 2013

146112 & (18)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146112

COA: 311983 

Wayne CC: 11-007685-FC

JERRY LEWIS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 26, 2012 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to 

supplement record is DENIED.
§ 115.134 Specialized training: Investigations. ( a ) In addition to the general training provided to all employees and volunteers pursuant to § 115.131, the agency shall ensure that, to the extent the agency itself conducts sexual abuse investigations, its investigators have received training in conducting such investigations in confinement settings.
( b ) Specialized training shall include techniques for interviewing sexual abuse victims, proper use of *Miranda* and *Garrity* warnings, sexual abuse evidence collection in confinement settings, and the criteria and evidence required to substantiate a case for administrative action or prosecution referral.
( c ) The agency shall maintain documentation that agency investigators have completed the required specialized training in conducting sexual abuse investigations.
( d ) Any State entity or Department of Justice component that investigates sexual abuse in lockups shall provide such training to their agents and investigators who conduct such investigations.
# C_2011211EN.01001701.xml

| 16.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/17

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) lodged on 16 May 2011 — Expedia Inc. v Autorité de la concurrence, Ministre de l’économie de l’industrie et de l’emploi, Société nationale des chemins de fer français (SNCF), Voyages-SNCF.Com, Agence Voyages-SNCF.Com, Société VFE Commerce, Société IDTGV, société par actions simplifiée

(Case C-226/11)

2011/C 211/32

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Cour de cassation

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Expedia Inc.

Applicant:

Defendants: Autorité de la concurrence, Ministre de l’économie de l’industrie et de l’emploi, Société nationale des chemins de fer français (SNCF), Voyages-SNCF.Com, Agence Voyages-SNCF.Com, Société VFE Commerce, Société IDTGV, société par actions simplifiée

Defendants:

Question referred

Question referred

Should Article 101(1) TFEU and Article 3(2) of Regulation No 1/2003 (1) be interpreted as precluding proceedings being brought and penalties being imposed by a national competition authority, on the grounds of both Article 101(1) TFEU and the national law of competition, in respect of a practice under agreements, decisions of associations of undertakings or concerted action that may affect trade between Member States, but which does not reach the thresholds specified by the European Commission in its notice of 22 December 2001 on agreements of minor importance which do not appreciably restrict competition under Article 81(1) of the Treaty establishing the European Community (de minimis) (OJ 2001 C 368, p. 13)?

1

de minimis

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (OJ 2003 L 1, p. 1).

1

---
---

---

Exhibit 4.25

# Summary of Share
Purchase Agreement in Hebrew

|Date:    | December 19, 2002                            
|-------- | ---------------------------------------------
|         |                                              
|Parties: | Robomatix Technologies Ltd.
(Robomatix)    
|         | Associative Computing Ltd. (the Subsidiary)
|         | Benny Konstantin (Konstantin)               

# The Transaction and
Consideration:

The Subsidiary issued Konstantin
9,200 ordinary shares, par value NIS 1.00 per share, constituting 50% of the
Subsidiarys issued and outstanding share capital (post closing) and Konstantin
acquired NIS 9.675 million of the Subsidiarys NIS 13.3 million debt to Robomatix.
Konstantin paid the Subsidiary 9,201 NIS, comprised of the aggregate par value of the
shares plus 1 NIS in consideration for the debt.

# Representations and
Warranties:

Robomatix and the Subsidiary made
standard representations and warranties to Konstantin with respect to the Subsidiary, its
business and affairs. Robomatix agreed to indemnify Konstantin for any loss above NIS
150,000 in connection with his reliance on the representations and warranties made by the
Subsidiary and/or Robomatix.

Konstantin made standard
representation and warranties for a purchaser, in agreements of this nature.

# Additional Terms:

- The Subsidiary agreed to provide Konstantin and Robomatix with capital (promissory) notes
guaranteeing repayment of its debt to each of them and setting forth repayment structure.
- Konstantin received the right to appoint two directors to the board of directors of the
Subsidiary, constituting half of the board of directors.
- Konstantin received protection from dilution of his share percentage in the event that the
Subsidiary is required to issue shares to any third party. Tthe Subsidiary will bear any
tax expense resulting from the issuance of additional shares to Konstantin.
- In the event that the Subsidiary is required to repay any debt noted in its financial
reports, Robomatix will grant a loan to the Subsidiary in the required amount.
Alternatively, Robomatix will invest the required amount in the Subsidiary. Such an
investment will not dilute Konstantins holdings in any way and the Subsidiary and/or
Robomatix shall bear any tax expense resulting from the issuance of additional shares to
Konstantin.



---

---