alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Do your part. For 14 days after your trip: 

For more information: www.cdc.gov/COVIDtravel CS 315649-U April 30, 2020 7:46 PM

STOP THE SPREAD OF COVID-19 

Stay home. Monitor your health.

COVID-19 can spread from people with no symptoms.

After 14 days, 

ű Continue to practice social distancing. 

ű Avoid close contact with others. Wear a cloth face covering when in public.

IF YOU GET SICK, call ahead before seeing a doctor.
www.cdc.gov/COVIDtravel 

For information about COVID-19 and how to monitor your health after travel, 

open your cell phone camera and scan this code: 

Для получения информации о COVID-19 и о том, как 

контролировать состояние вашего здоровья после 

путешествия, включите камеру на вашем мобильном 

телефоне и отсканируйте этот код:

Pour obtenir des informations relatives à COVID-19 et à la manière de surveiller 

votre santé après un voyage, ouvrez la caméra de votre téléphone portable et 

scannez le code suivant :

코로나바이러스감염증-19(COVID-19) 및 여행 후 건강 상태를 모니터

링하는 방법에 대한 정보를 보려면, 휴대폰 카메라로 이 코드를 스캔

하십시오:

COVID-19 ,

, :

新型コロナウイルス感染症(COVID-19)

に関する情報、および旅行後の自身の健

康状態を観察する方法については、携帯

電話のカメラを起動して、このコードを

スキャンしてください:

Untuk mendapatkan maklumat mengenai COVID-19 dan cara 

mengawasi kesihatan anda selepas perjalanan, buka kamera telefon bimbit anda 

dan imbas kod ini:

Para obter informações sobre o COVID-19 e como monitorar 

sua saúde após a viagem, abra a câmera do seu celular e 

digitalize este código:

Para obtener información sobre el COVID-19 y cómo monitorear su salud 

después de un viaje, abra la cámara de su teléfono y escanee este código: 

有关COVID-19 的信息以及如何在旅行后监

测您的健康状况,请打开手机摄像头并扫描

此二维码:

Per informazioni sulla COVID-19 e su come monitorare 

la Sua salute dopo il viaggio, apra la fotocamera del Suo 

cellulare e scansioni questo codice:
§ 1314.1 Applicability and effect. ( a ) *Applicability.* The regulations in this part govern the issuance of, and transactions in, all TVA Power Securities issued by TVA in book-entry form through the Reserve Banks.
( b ) *Effect.* The TVA Power Securities to which the regulations in this part apply are obligations which, by the terms of their issue, are available exclusively in book-entry form through the Reserve Banks' Book-entry System.
**Exhibit 12 (A) (2)**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Juan Antonio Quiroga García,certify that:

 

1.  I have reviewed this annualreport on Form 20-F of Grupo Industrial Maseca, S.A. de C.V.;

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

 

4.  The company’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

 

a.  designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b.  evaluated the effectivenessof the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

c.  disclosed in this report anychange in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, oris reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.  The company’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and theaudit committee of company’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

 

a.  all significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect thecompany’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

 

b.  any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
|                     | /s/ Juan Antonio Quiroga García |
|--------------------------|--------------------------------------|
|                     | Name:                                | Juan Antonio Quiroga García |
|                     | Title:                               | Senior Corporate Controller |
|                     |                                 |
|                     |                                 |
| Date: June 28, 2004 |                                 |

 

1

----
**Title III A FP Reporting Requirements** 

**Title III of the A**

**ssistive Technology Ac**  **t of 1998 (P.L. 105 -**  **395) SEC. 307. A**  **NNUA L REPORT**  Not later than December 31 of each year, the Secretary shall submit a report to the Committee on Education and the Wo rkforce of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Labor and Human Resources of the Senate describing the progress of each alternative financing program funded under this title toward achieving the objectives of this title. The report shall include informa tion on

— 1) the number of grant applications received and approved by the Secretary under this title, and the amount of each grant awarded under this title; 2) the ratio of funds provided by each State for the alternative financing program of the State to fund s provided by the Federal Government for the program; 3) the type of alternative financing mechanisms used by each State and the community

- based organization with which each State entered into a contract, under the program; and 4) the amount of assistance give n to consumers through the program (who shall be classified by age, type of disability, type of assistive technology device or assistive technology service financed through the program, geographic distribution within the State, gender, and whether the con sumers are part of an underrepresented population or rural population). **34 CFR part 75.720 Financial and Performance Reports** (a) This section applies to the reports required under

— 1) 34 CFR 74.51 (Monitoring and reporting program performance) and 34 CFR 74.52 (Financial reporting); and 2) 34 CFR 80.40 (Monitoring and reporting program performance) and 34 CFR 80.41 (Financial reporting). (b) A grantee shall submit these reports annually, unless the Secretary allows less frequent reporting.
### §3169. Valid existing right of access

Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to adversely affect any valid existing right of access.

(Pub. L. 96–487, title XI, §1109, Dec. 2, 1980, 94 Stat. 2464.)
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 53 (Friday, March 18, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 14897]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6376]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Humboldt County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC)

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Humboldt County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will 
meet in Eureka, California. The committee meeting is authorized under 
the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act (Pub. L. 
110-343) and in compliance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act.

DATES: The meeting will be held April 12, 2011, from 5 p.m. to 7 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Six Rivers National Forest 
Office, 1330 Bayshore Way, Eureka, CA 95501.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Adam Dellinger, Committee Coordinator, 
at (707) 441-3569; e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9cfdf8f9f0f0f5f2fbf9eedcfaefb2faf9f8b2e9ef"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c9a8adaca5a5a0a7aeacbb89afbae7afacade7bcba">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. The 
agenda includes a public comment period, discussion on project 
monitoring, and a vote on projects to recommend for funding.

    Dated: March 10, 2010.
Tyrone Kelley,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2011-6376 Filed 3-17-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Pictured is a Caucasian princess washing her hands with the text “Everyone loves to 

have clean hands!”
### §284i. Authorization of additional appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated not more than $17,000,000 to carry out sections 284c and 284d of this title. No authority under this subchapter to enter into contracts or to make payments shall be effective except to the extent and in such amounts as provided in advance in appropriations Acts.

(Pub. L. 89–671, §10, as added Pub. L. 97–310, Oct. 14, 1982, 96 Stat. 1458.)
### §7707. Effect on other laws

#### (a) Federal law

(1) Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to impair the enforcement of section 223 or 231 of title 47, chapter 71 (relating to obscenity) or 110 (relating to sexual exploitation of children) of title 18, or any other Federal criminal statute.

(2) Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to affect in any way the Commission's authority to bring enforcement actions under FTC Act for materially false or deceptive representations or unfair practices in commercial electronic mail messages.

#### (b) State law

#### (1) In general

This chapter supersedes any statute, regulation, or rule of a State or political subdivision of a State that expressly regulates the use of electronic mail to send commercial messages, except to the extent that any such statute, regulation, or rule prohibits falsity or deception in any portion of a commercial electronic mail message or information attached thereto.

#### (2) State law not specific to electronic mail

This chapter shall not be construed to preempt the applicability of—

(A) State laws that are not specific to electronic mail, including State trespass, contract, or tort law; or

(B) other State laws to the extent that those laws relate to acts of fraud or computer crime.

#### (c) No effect on policies of providers of Internet access service

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to have any effect on the lawfulness or unlawfulness, under any other provision of law, of the adoption, implementation, or enforcement by a provider of Internet access service of a policy of declining to transmit, route, relay, handle, or store certain types of electronic mail messages.

(Pub. L. 108–187, §8, Dec. 16, 2003, 117 Stat. 2716.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 108–187, Dec. 16, 2003, 117 Stat. 2699, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 7701 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 2004, see section 16 of Pub. L. 108–187, set out as a note under section 7701 of this title.
### SUBCHAPTER I—SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Steven Smith (Impleaded), Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 54820;

First District

September 13, 1971.

Gillis, Gildea & Rimland, of Chicago, (Jack P. Rimland and E. James Gildea, of counsel,) for appellant.

Edward V. Hanrahan, States Attorney of Cook County, of Chicago, (Robert A. Novelle and Nicholas Taubert, Assistant State’s Attorneys, of cousel,) for the People.

Opinion by

Mr. JUSTICE GOLDBERG.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-41405

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CAROLINA MORENO-BARRERA, also known as Carolina Moreno Esquivel,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:12-CR-1292-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Carolina MorenoBarrera has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Moreno-Barrera has not filed a response. We have reviewed

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue

for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 20, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 12-41405 Document: 00512348232 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/20/2013
No. 12-41405

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 12-41405 Document: 00512348232 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/20/2013
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-41470 No. 98-41471 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus SABINO GRANDE-FLORES, Defendant-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-98-CR-396-1 USDC No. B-98-CR-369-1

-------------------- August 24, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, and DAVIS and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The Assistant Federal Public Defenders appointed to represent Sabino Grande-Flores have filed a motion to withdraw from representation of Grande and a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Grande has filed no response to his attorneys’ motion and brief. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, Grande’s court-appointed attorneys’ motion to withdraw is GRANTED; the attorneys are excused from furtherNo. -2- responsibilities herein and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
EXHIBIT 32.1

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of TELECONNECT INC. (the
Company) for the quarter ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company each hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: February 13, 2006




---------------------------                 -----------------------------
Gustavo Gomez, Director,                    Herman de Haas,
Chief Executive Officer,                    Director, Executive Vice
President, Chief Financial                  President and Chief Operating
Officer and Treasurer                       Officer
#### Olga Shea, Respondent, v. Martin F. Shea et al., as Executors of William J. Shea, Deceased, Appellants.

*676Carswell, Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur.
# C_2011145EN.01000602.xml

| 14.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 145/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 145/6

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Wien (Austria) lodged on 3 February 2011 — Content Services Ltd v Bundesarbeitskammer

(Case C-49/11)

2011/C 145/07

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Oberlandesgericht Wien

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Content Services Ltd

Applicant:

Defendant: Bundesarbeitskammer

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

| 1. | Is the requirement in Article 5(1) of [Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 1997 on the protection of consumers (1) in respect of distance contracts] to the effect that a consumer must receive confirmation of the information specified there in a durable medium available and accessible to him, unless the information has already been given to him on conclusion of the contract in a durable medium available and accessible to him, satisfied, where that information is made available to the consumer by means of a hyperlink on the trader’s website which is contained in a line of text that the consumer must mark as read by ticking a box in order to be able to enter into a contractual relationship? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is the requirement in Article 5(1) of [Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 1997 on the protection of consumers (1) in respect of distance contracts] to the effect that a consumer must receive confirmation of the information specified there in a durable medium available and accessible to him, unless the information has already been given to him on conclusion of the contract in a durable medium available and accessible to him, satisfied, where that information is made available to the consumer by means of a hyperlink on the trader’s website which is contained in a line of text that the consumer must mark as read by ticking a box in order to be able to enter into a contractual relationship?

1

---

(1)  Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 1997 on the protection of consumers in respect of distance contracts — Statement by the Council and the Parliament re Article 6 (1) — Statement by the Commission re Article 3 (1), first indent (OJ 1997 L 144, p. 19).

1

---
# C_2010328EN.01003102.xml

| 4.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/31

---

Action brought on 7 September 2010 — Brighton Collectibles v OHIM — Felmar (BRIGHTON)

(Case T-403/10)

()

2010/C 328/54

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Brighton Collectibles, Inc. (City of Industry, USA) (represented by: R. Delorey, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Felmar (Paris, France)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 30 June 2010 in case R 408/2009-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 30 June 2010 in case R 408/2009-4;

| — | Annul all costs orders made against the applicant by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs); and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul all costs orders made against the applicant by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs); and

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘BRIGHTON’, for goods in class 25

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited: Non-registered word and figurative trade marks ‘BRIGHTON’ and ‘Brighton’, used in the course of trade in the United Kingdom, Ireland, Germany and Italy in respect of belts; well-known word and figurative trade marks ‘BRIGHTON’ and ‘Brighton’, used in the course of trade in the United Kingdom, Ireland, Germany and Italy in respect of leather goods, hats, jewellery and watches

Mark or sign cited:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(4) of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal erred in law, in finding that the earlier rights on which the opposition was based not to have been substantiated; infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal incorrectly excluded likelihood of confusion.

Pleas in law:

---
# C_2011030EN.01002002.xml

| 29.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/20

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Magyar Köztársaság Legfelsőbb Bírósága (Hungary) lodged on 15 November 2010 — ERSTE Bank Hungary Nyrt v Magyar Állam, B.C.L Trading GmbH, ERSTE Befektetési Zrt.

(Case C-527/10)

()

2011/C 30/34

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Referring court

Magyar Köztársaság Legfelsőbb Bírósága

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: ERSTE Bank Hungary Nyrt

Applicant:

Defendants: Magyar Állam, B.C.L Trading GmbH, ERSTE Befektetési Zrt.

Defendants:

Intervener: dr. Bárándy és Társai Ügyvédi Iroda, Komerční banka a.s.

Intervener:

Question referred

Question referred

Does Article 5(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 (1) of 29 May 2000 on insolvency proceedings (‘the Regulation’) govern civil proceedings relating to the existence of rights in rem (security deposits) where the country in which the bond, and subsequently the money it represented, was deposited as a security was not a Member State of the European Union at the time when insolvency proceedings were instituted in another Member State, but was a Member State of the European Union by the time the application initiating the proceedings was submitted?

1

---

(1)  OJ L 160, p. 1,

1

---