### west virginia department of environmental protection



# Appendix G

Jefferson County, OH

Emissions Inventory Summary

Promoting a healthy environment.

## [This page intentionally left blank.]1 

## Crowder, Laura M

From: Crowder, Laura M

Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 5:16 PM

To: William Durham (William.F.Durham@wv.gov)

Cc: Laura Mae Crowder (Laura.M.Crowder@wv.gov)

Subject: FW: Weirton PM 2.5 SIP Inventory Data

Attachments: Steuby_1-5-2012.xlsx



### Fred,

Here is the Jefferson County Ohio inventory data from Jennifer.

Laura

From: Dines, Jennifer [mailto:Jennifer.Dines@epa.state.oh.us]

Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 10:44 AM

To: Crowder, Laura M

Cc: Durham, William F

Subject: RE: Weirton PM 2.5 SIP Inventory Data



### I’ve crunched numbers...attached is what I plan to use. See the tab marked 2025. Yellow highlighted cells are what I

changed based on your latest update. I went with your nonroad....but the other areas for Jefferson I went back to my

original numbers and extrapolated etc. so they vary a little. I only edited those main tables...summary tables haven’t

been looked at and reworked so ignore any data in those.

Plowing ahead!!!!!!!

Thanks!!!



## Jennifer Dines

Manager, State Implementation Plan and Rulemaking Section

Division of Air Pollution Control

Ohio Environmental Protection Agency

Wk (614) 644

‐ 3696

Fax (614) 644

‐ 3681

.

## [This page intentionally left blank.]

### Jefferson

Sector 2005 Base 2008

Attainment 2015

Interim 2025

Maintenance Safety Margin

EGU Point 1,307.90 1,372.80 1,405.39 1,449.64 -76.84

Non-EGU 461.57 461.42 437.63 413.69 47.73

Non-road 

### 24.30 22.50 17.15 11.25 11.25

Area 110.12 110.6 108.49 105.97 4.63

MAR 8.07 7.25 4.5 0.68 6.57

On-road 73.17 60.97 31.88 

### 16.49 44.48

TOTAL 

### 1,985.13 2,035.54 2,005.04 1,997.72 37.82



### Mobile contrib 3.685905 2.99527398 1.5899932 0.825441003

Hancock, WV

Sector 2005 Base 2008

Attainment 2015

Interim 2025

Maintenance Safety Margin

EGU Point 

### 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Non-EGU 

### 182.02 90.97 83.84 74.81 16.16

Non-road 

### 9.61 8.20 5.57 3.10 5.10

Area 

### 313.70 232.96 230.26 229.92 3.04

MAR 

### 26.18 18.46 18.58 18.75 -0.28

On-road 

### 18.63 13.51 6.53 4.10 9.41

TOTAL 

### 550.14 364.10 344.78 330.68 33.42



### Brooke, WV

Sector 2005 Base 2008

Attainment 2015

Interim 2025

Maintenance Safety Margin

EGU Point 

### 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Non-EGU 

### 155.12 166.68 155.84 141.59 25.08

Non-road 

### 11.04 9.46 6.47 3.76 5.69

Area 

### 208.48 219.93 217.55 216.00 3.93

MAR 

### 17.07 3.85 3.87 3.91 -0.06

On-road 

### 19.41 14.42 6.97 4.34 10.08

TOTAL 

### 411.13 414.33 390.70 369.61 44.73



### 111.21 88.90 45.38 24.93

PM2.5 2005 Base 2008

Attainment 2015

Interim 2022

Maintenance Safety Margin



### Jefferson 1,985.13 2,035.54 2,005.04 1,997.72 37.82



### Hancock, W V 550.14 364.10 344.78 330.68 33.42



### Brooke, W V 411.13 414.33 390.70 369.61 44.73

COMBINED PM 2.5

TOTAL 

### 2,946.40 2,813.97 2,740.52 2,698.01 115.97



### Mobile contrib 3.774442 3.15923393 1.6558886 0.924015792

on road 111.21 88.90 45.38 24.93

non road 44.95 40.16

EGU 1,307.90 1,372.80 NonRoad

‐ WV ran the NONROAD Model for Brooke, Hancock and Jefferson Counties for

2005, 2008, 2015 and 2025

### Jefferson

Sector 2005 Base 2008 Attainment 2015

Interim 2025

Maintenance Safety

Margin



### EGU 225,594.94 135,506.74 72,203.22 45,073.14 90,433.60



### NonEGU 849.92 782.87 757.91 692.85 90.02



### Nonroad 17.31 3.09 0.40 0.45 2.64



### Area Sources 110.89 109.15 101.75 91.69 17.46



### Maritime/Air/Rail 26.16 21.61 13.04 0.48 21.13



### Onroad 18.18 5.65 3.93 3.56 2.09

TOTAL 

### 226,617.40 136,429.11 73,080.25 45,862.17 90,566.94



### Mobile contrib 0.008022332 0.004141345 0.0053776 0.007762389

Hancock, WV

Sector 2005 Base 2008 Attainment 2015

Interim 2025

Maintenance Safety

Margin



### EGU 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00



### NonEGU 1,480.85 613.04 572.55 519.57 93.47



### Nonroad 9.72 1.73 0.21 0.23 1.50



### Area Sources 728.92 248.63 237.35 221.22 27.41



### Maritime/Air/Rail 32.27 31.47 31.67 31.96 -0.48



### Onroad 6.58 1.92 1.36 1.10 0.82

TOTAL 

### 2,258.35 896.80 843.14 774.09 122.71



### Brooke, WV

Sector 2005 Base 2008 Attainment 2015

Interim 2025

Maintenance Safety

Margin



### EGU 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00



### NonEGU 620.55 766.54 718.43 654.91 111.63



### Nonroad 12.13 2.17 0.27 0.30 1.87



### Area Sources 167.98 163.76 156.62 146.42 17.33



### Maritime/Air/Rail 20.32 6.34 6.38 6.44 -0.10



### Onroad 7.01 2.11 1.51 1.26 0.85

TOTAL 

### 827.98 940.92 883.21 809.34 131.58



### 31.77 9.68 6.80 5.92

SO2 2005 Base 2008 Attainment 2015

Interim 2022

Maintenance Safety

Margin



### Jefferson 226,617.40 136,429.11 73,080.25 45,862.17 90,566.94



### Hancock, W V 2,258.35 896.80 843.14 774.09 122.71



### Brooke, W V 827.98 940.92 883.21 809.34 131.58

COMBINED SO2

TOTAL 

### 229,703.73 138,266.82 74,806.60 47,445.59 90,821.23



### Mobile SO2 contrib 0.013830859 0.007000956 0.0090901 0.01247745

on road 31.77 9.68 6.80 5.92

non road 39.16 6.99

EGU 225,594.94 135,506.74

### Jefferson

Sector 2005 Base 2008

Attainment 2015 Interim 2025 Maintenance Safety

Margin



### EGU 41,046.61 35,486.86 19,488.27 12,631.73 22,855.13



### NonEGU 1,991.85 1,991.96 1,938.71 1,863.75 128.21



### Nonroad 234.30 207.68 131.49 96.59 111.09



### Area Sources 251.38 253.45 252.46 251.93 1.52



### Maritime/Air/Rail 317.3 300.96 202.51 70.94 230.02



### Onroad 2,105.85 1,758.04 870.17 322.71 1,435.33

TOTAL 

### 45,947.29 39,998.95 22,883.61 15,237.65 24,761.30



### Mobile contrib 4.58318652 4.395215374 3.80259059 2.117846256

Hancock, WV

Sector 2005 Base 2008

Attainment 2015 Interim 2025 Maintenance Safety

Margin



### EGU 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00



### NonEGU 1,181.15 574.68 524.80 462.67 112.01



### Nonroad 135.47 119.41 74.58 51.49 67.92



### Area Sources 1,446.78 158.02 156.60 154.58 3.43



### Maritime/Air/Rail 695.36 534.89 538.26 543.08 -8.18



### Onroad 482.75 360.25 149.00 52.09 308.16

TOTAL 

### 3,941.51 1,747.25 1,443.24 1,263.91 483.34



### Brooke, WV

Sector 2005 Base 2008

Attainment 2015 Interim 2025 Maintenance Safety

Margin



### EGU 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00



### NonEGU 692.76 789.79 742.21 679.29 110.50



### Nonroad 204.75 169.37 88.18 59.17 110.20



### Area Sources 311.36 119.10 117.87 116.12 2.99



### Maritime/Air/Rail 444.99 112.83 113.54 114.56 -1.73



### Onroad 540.40 412.02 174.71 62.47 349.55

TOTAL 

### 2,194.25 1,603.12 1,236.53 1,031.61 571.51



### 3,129.00 2,530.31 1,193.88 437.27

NOx 2005 Base 2008

Attainment 2015 Interim 2022 Maintenance Safety

Margin



### Jefferson 45,947.29 39,998.95 22,883.61 15,237.65 24,761.30



### Hancock, W V 3,941.51 1,747.25 1,443.24 1,263.91 483.34



### Brooke, W V 2,194.25 1,603.12 1,236.53 1,031.61 571.51

COMBINED NOx

TOTAL 

### 52,083.05 43,349.32 25,563.37 17,533.17 25,816.15



### Mobile contrib 6.00771249 5.837023961 4.67027536 2.493958443

on road 3,129.00 2,530.31 1,193.88 437.27

non road 574.51 496.47

EGU 41,046.61 35,486.86

### west virginia department of environmental protection



# Appendix H

Redesignation Request and

Maintenance Plan

for the Ohio Portion of the

Steubenville-Weirton OH-WV

24-Hour PM

2.5 

# Nonattainment

Area

Jefferson County, Ohi o

Promoting a healthy environment.

## [This page intentionally left blank.]

# TH RED E

M

T

E ST E

N

Ohi o

D 

# E SIG N

M AIN T

T HE O

E UB E

2

N ON A

Jef f

o Envir o

D ivisio 

# N ATI O

T ENA N

O HIO

E NVI L

2 4-H O

A TTAI

f erson

Pre p

o nme n

n of Ai r

M a 

# O N R E

N CE P

PO R

L LE- W

O UR P

NME N

Coun t

p ared b

n tal Pr o

r Pollu t

a y 201 2 

# E QU E

P LAN

R TION

W EIR T

P M 2.5



# NT A R

ty, Oh

b y:

o tectio n

t ion C o

2 

# E ST A

FOR

N OF

T ON O

R EA

io

n Agen

o ntrol 

# A ND

O H-W V

cy

## This page left intentionally blank

### i 

# TABLE OF CONTENTS

Chapter One

Introduction .................................................................................................................. ................. 1

Geographical description and background ................................................................................... 2

Status of air quality ......................................................................................................... .............. 3

Chapter Two

Requirements for redesignation ................................................................................................ .... 4

Chapter Three

PM 2.5 

### monitoring ................................................................................................................... ....... 10

24-Hour PM 2.5 

### NAAQS ................................................................................................................ 10

Ambient data quality assured .................................................................................................. .... 11

Three complete years of data .................................................................................................. ... 11

Commitment to continue monitoring ........................................................................................... 1 7

Chapter Four

Emission inventory ............................................................................................................ .......... 18

Base year inventory ........................................................................................................... ......... 18

Emission projections .......................................................................................................... ......... 19

Demonstration of maintenance .................................................................................................. . 27

Permanent and enforceable emissions reductions ..................................................................... 37

Provisions for future update .................................................................................................. ...... 38

Chapter Five

Control measures and regulations .............................................................................................. 39

Nonattainment areas to implement RACM and RACT ................................................................ 39

Show Reasonable Further Progress (RFP) ................................................................................ 41

Emission inventories .......................................................................................................... ......... 41

Implementation of past SIP revisions .......................................................................................... 42

New source review provisions ................................................................................................. .. 44

Assurance of continued controls ............................................................................................... .. 45

Chapter Six

Contingency measures .......................................................................................................... ..... 46

Commitment to revise plan ..................................................................................................... .... 46

Commitment for contingency measures ..................................................................................... 47

Potential contingency measures ................................................................................................ . 47

List of PM 2.5 

### , SO 2 

### , and NO

x 

### sources ........................................................................................... 48

Chapter Seven

Public participation .......................................................................................................... ............ 49

Chapter Eight

Conclusions ................................................................................................................... ............. 50

### ii 

### FIGURES

Figure 1 Steubenville- Weirton 24-Hour PM 2.5 

### Exceedances......................................9

Figure 2 Map of the Steubenville-Weirton, OH-WV, nonattainment area and monitor

locations .............................................................................................................. 11

Figure 3 Ohio 24-Hour PM 2.5 

### : Design Values 1999-2001 Through 2008-2010 ................ 15

Figure 4 West Virginia 24-Hour PM 2.5 

### Design Values 1999-2001 Through 2008-2010 .... 16

Figure 5 PM 2.5 

### 24- Hour Mean National Trends ................................................................ 16

TABLES

Table 1 Monitoring Data for Steubenville-Weirton, OH-WV area for 2008 – 2010 ........... 13

Table 2 98th Percentile and Design Value Before and After Imputation .......................... 14

Table 3 Jefferson County, Ohio Emission Estimations for On-road Mobile Sources ....... 25

Table 4 Summary of Ohio Emissions Estimations for On-road Mobile Sources .............. 25

Table 5 Brooke County, West Virginia Emission Estimations for On-road Mobile

Sources ............................................................................................................... 25

Table 6 Hancock County, West Virginia Emission Estimations for On-road Mobile

Sources ............................................................................................................... 25

Table 7 Summary of West Virginia Emission Estimations for On-Road Mobile Sources . 26

Table 8 Emission Estimations Totals for On-road Mobile Sources for the SteubenvilleWeirton Area ....................................................................................................... 26

Table 9 Percent of Mobile Emissions for the Steubenville-Weirton Area in 2015

and 2025 .... ........................................................................................................ 26

Table 10 Reductions in SO 2 

### and 

## NO

x 

### EGU Emissions Between 2008 and 2009. ............. 29

Table 11 Reductions in SO 2 

### and 

## NO

x 

### EGU Emissions Between the First Half of 2008

and 2010.... ......................................................................................................... 30

Table 12 Jefferson County, Ohio PM 2.5 

### Emission Inventory Totals for Base Year 2005,

Estimated 2008, and Projected 2015 and 2025 (tpy) – Without CAIR. ............... 32

Table 13 Brooke County, West Virginia PM 2.5 

### Emission Inventory Totals for Base Year

2005, Estimated 2008, and Projected 2015 and 2025 (tpy) – With CSAPR. ....... 32

Table 14 Hancock County, West Virginia PM 2.5 

### Emission Inventory Totals for Base Year

2005, Estimated 2008, and Projected 2015 and 2025 (tpy) – With CSAPR. ....... 32

Table 15 Steubenville-Weirton Area PM 2.5 

### Emission Inventory Totals for Base Year 2005,

Estimated 2008, and Projected 2015 and 2025 (tpy) – Without CAIR (Ohio) and

With CSAPR (West Virginia). .............................................................................. 33

Table 16 Jefferson County, Ohio NO

x 

### Emission Inventory Totals for Base Year 2005,

Estimated 2008, and Projected 2015 and 2025 (tpy) – With CAIR ..................... 33

Table 17 Brooke County, West Virginia NO

x 

### Emission Inventory Totals for Base Year

2005, Estimated 2008, and Projected 2015 and 2025 (tpy) – With CSAPR ........ 33

Table 18 Hancock County, West Virginia NO

x 

### Emission Inventory Totals for Base Year

2005, Estimated 2008, and Projected 2015 and 2025 (tpy) – With CSAPR. ....... 34

Table 19 Steubenville-Weirton Area NO

x 

### Emission Inventory Totals for Base Year 2005,

Estimated 2008, and Projected 2015 and 2025 (tpy) – With CAIR (Ohio) and With

CSAPR (West Virginia). ...................................................................................... 34

Table 20 Jefferson County, Ohio SO 2 

### Emission Inventory Totals for Base Year 2005,

Estimated 2008, and Projected 2015 and 2025 (tpy) – With CAIR ..................... 34

### iii 

### Table 21 Brooke County, West Virginia SO 2 

### Emission Inventory Totals for Base Year

2005, Estimated 2008, and Projected 2015 and 2025 (tpy) – With CSAPR ........ 35

Table 22 Hancock County, West Virginia SO 2 

### Emission Inventory Totals for Base Year

2005, Estimated 2008, and Projected 2015 and 2025 (tpy) – With CSAPR ........ 35

Table 23 Steubenville-Weirton Area SO 2 

### Emission Inventory Totals for Base Year 2005,

Estimated 2008, and Projected 2015 and 2025 (tpy) – With CAIR (Ohio) and With

CSAPR (West Virginia) ....................................................................................... 35

Table 24 Steubenville-Weirton Area Comparison of 2008 attainment year and 2015 and

2025 Projected Emission Estimates (tpy) ............................................................ 36

Table 25 Steubenville-Weirton Area Combined Comparison of 2005 Base Year and 2008

Attainment Year On-Road and EGU Reductions ................................................ 38

APPENDICES

A Air Quality System (AQS) Data

B Ohio 2005 SIP Base Year Inventory Discussion

C Mobile Source Emissions Inventory for the Steubenville-Weirton PM 2.5 

### Nonattainment

Area

D LADCO Technical Support Document and WVDAQ Nonroad Modeling

E Incomplete Monitoring Data Substitution Analysis

F Public Participation Documentation

### iv 

## This page left intentionally blank

## REDESIGNATION REQUEST AND MA INTENANCE PLAN FOR THE OHIO

PORTION OF THE STEUBENVILLE-WEIRTON OH-WV

24-HOUR PM 2.5 

## NONATTAINMENT AREA

Jefferson County, Ohio



# CHAPTER ONE

Introduction

The Clean Air Act (CAA), as amended, requires each State with areas failing

to meet the 24-hour PM 2.5 1 

## National Ambient Air Q uality Standard (NAAQS) to

develop State Implementation Plans (SIPs) to expeditiously attain and

maintain the standard. The United Stat es Environmental Protection Agency

(U.S. EPA) revised the NAAQS for particu late matter in 2006. In 2006, U.S.

EPA strengthened the pr imary 24-hour PM 2.5 

## NAAQS from 65 μg/m 3 

## to 35

μg/m 3 

## , and retained the current primary annual PM 2.5 

## NAAQS at 15.0 μg/m 3



## . The revised 24-hour PM 2.5 

## standard was published on October 17, 2006 (71

FR 61144) and became effective on Dece mber 18, 2006. The standard is

based on the 3-year average of the 98 th 

## percentile of 24-hour concentrations.

On November 13, 2009, U.S. EPA pr omulgated (74 FR 58688) the initial

PM 2.5 

## nonattainment areas desi gnations for the 24-hour PM 2.5 

## standard

across the country (effective December 14, 2009). Unlike Subpart 2 of the

CAA Amendments of 1990 which defi ned five ozone nonattainment

classifications for the areas that exceed the NAAQS ba sed on the severity of

the ozone levels, PM 2.5 

## nonattainment designations are simply labeled

“nonattainment.” The CAA Amendm ents require states with PM 2.5 

## nonattainment areas to submit a plan with in three years of the effective date

of the designations (December 14, 2012) detailing how the PM 2.5 

## standard will

be attained by December 14, 2014. Howe ver, areas that attain before the

required date for submitting a plan ma y be exempt from certain otherwise

applicable requirements.

Section 107(d)(3)(E) of the CAA allows states to request nonattainment areas

to be redesignated to attainment pr ovided certain criteria are met. The

following are the criteria that must be met in order for an area to be

1 Particle pollution is a mixture of microscopic solids and liquid droplets suspended in air. This pollution,

also known as particulate matter, is made up of a number of components, including acids (such as

nitrates and sulfates), organic c hemicals, metals, soil or dust particles, and allergens (such as

fragments of pollen or mold spores).

Fine particle pollution or PM 2.5 describes particulate matter that is 2.5 micrometers in diameter and

smaller - 1/30th the diameter of a human hair. Fine pa rticle pollution can be emitted directly or formed

secondarily in the atmosphere.

### 2 

## redesignated from nonattain ment to a ttainment:

• A determination that the area has attained the PM 2.5



## standard.

• An approved State Implementati on Plan (SIP) for the area

under Section 110(k).

• A determination that the improv ement in air quality is due to

permanent and enforceable reductions in emissions resulting

from implementation of the SIP and other federal

requirements.

• A fully approved maintenance plan under Section 175(A).

• A determination that all Sectio n 110 and Part D requirements

have been met.

This document addresses each of t hese requirements, and provides

additional information to support cont inued compliance with the 24-hour PM 2.5



## standard.

On October 4, 2011, U.S. EPA proposed (76 FR 61291) to determine that the

Steubenville-Weirton nonattainment area has clean data for the 24-hour PM 2.5



## standard 2 

## . The proposed determination is based upon quality assured, quality

controlled, and certified ambient air monitoring data showing the area has

monitored attainment bas ed on 2008 through 2010 data.

The Steubenville-Weirton area has previously been subject to nonattainment

area rulemakings for the 1997 fine particl e NAAQS. Ohio wa s only subject to

requirements to address the annual standard under the 1997 fine particle

NAAQS as there were no monitors in Ohio that violated the 1997 24-hour

PM 2.5 

## standard of 65 μ g/m3. In April, 2012, Ohio EPA submitted a

redesignation request and maintenance plan for the Steubenville-Weirton

1997 annual standard nonattainment area.

Geographical Descrip tion and Background

The current Steubenville -Weirton nonattainment area is located on the

eastern border of Ohio and includes the following c ounties: Jefferson in Ohio

and Hancock and Brooke in West Virginia . This area is shown in Figure 2

under Chapter Three.

As a result of the 2009 PM 2.5 

## designations, U.S. EPA designated the

Steubenville-Weirton area nonat tainment for the 35 μ g/m 3 

## 24-hour standard,

and Ohio EPA is required to develop a pl an to reduce oxides of nitrogen

(NO

x 

## ), sulfur dioxide (SO 2 

## ) and direct PM 2.5 

## emissions and to demonstrate

that the area will meet the federal 24-hour air qual ity standard by December

2 

### This proposal was based on a February 14, 2011 request submitted by the West Virginia

Division of Air Quality.

### 3 

## 14, 2014. Ohio’s main PM 2.5 

## components are primary particles (organic

carbon, crustal material , and elemental carbon), SO 2 

## and NO

x 

## , which were

included in the attain ment demonstration analysis for the 1997 annual PM 2.5 

## NAAQS submitted to U.S. EPA on July 16, 2008. Volatile organic compounds

(VOCs) and ammonia (NH3) were not included in the analysis since they

were not part of Ohio’s attainment strategy for PM 2.5 

## (although controls for

VOCs have been implemented for ozone nonatta inment). This is consistent

with U.S. EPA’s “Clean Ai r Particle Implementati on Rule” [74 FR 20856]

(hereafter referred to as “1997 Im plementation Rule”). In the 1997

Implementation Rule U. S. EPA presumes NH 3 

## emissions are not a PM 2.5 

## attainment plan precursor and that St ates are not required to address VOC

unless the State or U.S. EPA makes a technical demon stration that emissions

of VOCs significantly contri bute to nonattainment of the PM 2.5 

## standard. This

is also consistent with U.S. EPA’s “I mplementation Guidance for the 2006 24-

Hour Fine Particle (PM 2.5 

## ) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)”

memorandum issued on March 2, 2012 (hereafter referred to as “2006

Implementation Memo”). In this me morandum, U.S. EPA recommends that

“the projected attainment inventory for the nonattainment area includes direct

PM 2.5 

## , SO 2 

## , presumptively NO

x 

## , as well as other precursors that have been

determined to be significant through t he area’s SIP development process.”

Furthermore, the 2006 Implementation Memo indicates that U.S. EPA

believes the overall framewor k and policy approach of the 1997

Implementation Rule “continues to pr ovide effective and appropriate guidance

on the EPA’s interpretation of the general statutory requirements that states

should address in their SI Ps” and that they are “rel evant to t he statutory

requirements” for the 2006 24-hour PM 2.5 

## standard.

This document is intended to support Ohio’s request that the Ohio portions of

the Steubenville-Weirt on area be redesignated from nonattainment to

attainment for the 24-hour PM 2.5 

## standard. In addition, the State of West

Virginia may also submit a request fo r their respective portions of the

Steubenville-Weirton area.

Status of Air Quality

PM 2.5 

## complete quality-assured ambient air quality monitoring data for the

three (3) years, 2008 through 2010, demonstr ate that the air quality has met

the NAAQS for 24-hour PM 2.5 

## in this nonattainme nt area. The NAAQS

attainment, accompanied by decreases in emission levels discussed in

Chapter Four, supports a redesignation to attainm ent for the SteubenvilleWeirton area based on the re quirements in Section 107(d)(3)(E) of the CAA

as amended.

### 4 

# CHAPTER TWO

Requirements for Redesignation

U.S. EPA has published detailed gui dance in a document entitled Procedures

for Processing Requests to Redesignate Areas to Attainment (redesignation

guidance), issued Septem ber 4, 1992, to Regional Air Directors. The

redesignation request and maintenance plan are based on the redesignation

guidance, supplemented wit h additional guidance received from staff of U.S.

EPA Region 5.

Below is a summary of each redesignat ion criterion as it applies to the

Steubenville-Weirton area.

i.) Attainment of the standard (CAA Section 107(d)(3)(E)(i))

There are two components involved in making this

demonstration. The first compon ent relies on ambient air quality

data. The data that are used to demonstrate attainment should

be the product of ambient monitori ng that is representative of

the area of highest concentration . The data should be collected

and quality-assured in acco rdance with 40 CFR 58 and

recorded in the Air Quality System (AQS) in order for it to be

available to the public for review.

The second component relies upon supplemental U.S. EPAapproved air quality modeling. While no modeling is required for

redesignating nonattainment areas , the redesignation guidance

states it is “generally nece ssary” for particulate matter

redesignations. Appendix C and Appendix D contai ns the most

recent modeling results sho wing future attainment and

maintenance are provided. C hapter Three discusses this

requirement in more detail a nd provides the attainment

demonstration.

ii.) Permanent and enforceable improvem ent in air quality (CAA Section

107(d)(3)(E)(iii))

The state must be able to reas onably attribute the improvement

in air quality to emission r eductions which are permanent and

enforceable. The stat e should estimate the percent reduction

achieved from federal measures as well as control measures

that have been adopted and impl emented by the state.

It was not necessary for Ohio to adopt or implement control

measures for these counties bey ond the federal measures.

Ohio EPA has adopted several rule s recently that will have an

impact on statewide PM 2.5 

## emissions in the future:

### 5 

## • Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR)

• NO

x 

## SIP Call Rules

Ohio was also subject to a Federal Implement ation Plan under

the CAIR replacement rule, the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule

(CSAPR) that could have result ed in even greater reductions

than the CAIR program. Howeve r, on December 30, 2011, the

D.C. Circuit Court stayed CSAPR and ordered U.S. EPA to

continue administering CAIR pendi ng the court’s resolution.

In addition, since the initial designations were made federally

enforceable consent decrees have resulted in reductions in

emissions from utilities withi n Jefferson County and across the

state, including this area.

Chapters Four and Five discuss this requirement in more detail.

iii.) Section 110 and Part D requirem ents (CAA Section 107(d)(3)(E)(v))

For purposes of redesignatio n, a state must meet all

requirements of Section 110 and Part D that were applicable

prior to submittal of the co mplete redesignation request.

Subpart 1 of Part D consists of general requirements applicable

to all areas which are desig nated nonattainment based on a

violation of the NAAQS. Subpart 4 of Part D consists of more

specific requirements applicable to particulate matter

(specifically to address PM 10 

## ). However, for the purpose of

implementing the PM 2.5 

## standard, U.S. EPA’s 1997

Implementation Rule st ated Subpart 1, rather than Subpart 4, is

appropriate for the purpos e of implementing PM 2.5 

## .[72 FR

20589]

Section 110(a) requirements

Section 110(a) of Title I of the CAA contains the general

requirements for a SIP. Sect ion 110(a)(2) provides that

the implementation plan submi tted by a state must have

been adopted by the state after reasonable public notice

and hearing, and that, among other things, it must

include enforceable emission li mitations and other control

measures, means or techniques necessary to meet the

requirements of the CAA; pr ovide for establishment and

operation of appropriate dev ices, methods, systems and

procedures necessary to monitor ambient air quality;

provide for implementation of a source permit program to

regulate the modification and construction of any

### 6 

## stationary source within the areas covered by the plan;

include provisions for the implementation of Part C,

prevention of significant det erioration (PSD) and Part D,

NSR permit programs; includ e criteria for stationary

source emission control measures, monitoring, and

reporting; include provisions for air quality modeling; and

provide for public and loca l agency participation in

planning and emission contro l rule development. In

Ohio’s December 5, 2007 and September 4, 2009

infrastructure SIP submissions , Ohio verified that the

State fulfills the r equirements of Section 110(a)(2) of the

Act.

Section 110(a)(2)(D) also requi res State plans to prohibit

emissions from within the State which contribute

significantly to nonattainment or maintenance areas in

any other State, or which interfere with programs under

Part C to prevent significant deterioration of air quality or

to achieve reasonable progress toward the national

visibility goal for Federal class I areas (national parks and

wilderness areas). In order to assist States in addressing

their obligations regarding regionally transported

pollution, U.S. EPA finalized CAIR to reduce SO 2 

## and

NO

x 

## emissions from large el ectric generating units

(EGU). Ohio has met the r equirements of the federal

CAIR to reduce NO

x 

## and SO 2 

## emissions contributing to

downwind states. On Febr uary 1, 2008, U.S. EPA

approved Ohio’s CAIR program , which can be found in

Ohio Administrative Code (OAC) Chapter 3745-109 3 

## . On

July 6, 2011, U.S. EPA finaliz ed a replacement to the

CAIR program, the CSAPR. CS APR could further assist

States in addressing their obli gations regarding regionally

transported pollution by pr oviding reductions in NO

x 

## and

SO 2 

## emissions in 2012 and 2014. However, on

December 30, 2011, the D.C. Circuit Court stayed

CSAPR and ordered U.S. EPA to cont inue administering

CAIR pending the court’s resolution.

iv.) Section 172(c) requirements

This Section contains general requirements for nonattainment

plans. The requirements for r easonable further progress,

identification of certain em issions increases, and other

measures needed for attain ment will not apply for

redesignations because they onl y have meaning for areas not

3 http://www.epa.ohio.gov/dapc/regs/regs.aspx#3745-109

### 7 

## attaining the standard. The r equirements for an emission

inventory will be satisfied by t he inventory requirements of the

maintenance plan. Chapters Four and Five discuss this

requirement in more detail.

v.) Conformity

The state must work with U.S. EPA to show that its SIP

provisions are consistent with the Section 176(c )(4) conformity

requirements. The redesignat ion request should include

conformity procedures, if the state already has these

procedures in place. If a state does not have conformity

procedures in place at the time that it submits a redesignation

request, the state must commit to follow U.S. EPA’s conformity

regulation upon issuance, as applicable.

vi.) Maintenance plans (CAA Section 107(d)(3)(E)(iv))

Section 107(d)(3)(E) stipulat es that for an area to be

redesignated, U.S. EPA must fully approve a maintenance plan

that meets the requirement s of Section 175(A). The

maintenance plan will constitute a SIP revision and must

provide for maintenance of the relevant NAAQS in the area for

at least 10 years after redesignation. Section 175 (A) further

states that the plan shall contai n such additional measures, if

any, as may be necessary to ensure such maintenance.

In addition, the maintenance plan shall contain such

contingency measures as the Ad ministrator deems necessary to

ensure prompt correction of any violation of the NAAQS. At a

minimum, the contingency m easures must include a

requirement that the state will implement all measures

contained in the nonattainment SIP prior to redesignation.

States seeking redesignation of a nonattainment area should

consider the following provisions:

a.) attainment inventory;

b.) maintenance demonstration;

c.) monitoring network;

d.) verification of continued attainment; and

e.) contingency plan.

U.S. EPA’s 2006 Implementation Memo states:

As mentioned earlier in this memorandum, statewide annual

emission inventories are r equired under 40 CFR Part 51,

### 8 

## Subpart A. We expect that for m any nonattainment areas, these

annual inventories will serve as an appropriate starting point for

the emission inventories used fo r SIP development. In contrast

with the 1997 annual PM 2.5 

## NAAQS, where states rely only on

annual inventories in the impl ementation process, the 2006 24-

hour PM 2.5 

## NAAQS is designed to protect against peak

exposures. Thus, for the 2006 24-hour PM 2.5 

## NAAQS, there are

some circumstances in which EPA believes that seasonal

inventories may be useful fo r SIP planning purposes. For

example, we have observed that in some nonattainment areas,

all of the highest fine particle conc entrations over the course of

a year occur in one season.

If exceedances occur during only one season for each of the

years on which the nonattainment designation is based, and this

is the case for all subsequent ye ars, we recommend that states

develop a seasonal inventory and that they use this inventory

for SIP planning purposes....

Ohio EPA analyzed the PM 2.5 

## monitoring data for the SteubenvilleWeirton area to determine whether the exceedances occurred in only

one season. As can be seen in Figure 2 below, exceedances between

2006 and 2008, the years on which the nonattainment designation is

based, occurred in the first, second, third and fourth quarters. During

subsequent years, 2009 through 2010, exceedances have occurred in

the first, third and fourth quarters. Based on this analysis and in

consultation with U.S. EPA and the We st Virginia Division of Air Quality

(WVDAQ), it was determined that an annual invent ory would be

sufficient for SIP planning, and that a seasonal inventory would not be

required.

### 9 

## Figure 1 – Steubenville-Weirton 24-hour PM 2.5 

## Exceedances

Chapter Six discusses this requirement in more detail. 1 3 4

1 1 11 11

0 2 3 14

0 2

0 0 1 1

0 1

0

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4NumberofExceedances 

## Steubenville

‐ Weirton Area 24

‐ hr PM

2.5 

## Exceedances

(>34.4 ug/m 3 

### ) per Quarter

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

### 10 

# CHAPTER THREE

PM 2.5 

## MONITORING

CAA Section 107(d)(3)(E)(i)

Requirement 1 of 4

A demonstration that t he NAAQS for 24-hour PM 2.5 

## , as published in 40 CFR

50.7, has been attained.

Background

There are 5 monitors measuring PM 2.5 

## concentrations in this

nonattainment area. Two monito rs in Jefferson County, Ohio 4



## , two in Brooke County, WV and one in Hancock County, WV. A

listing of the design values base d on the three-year average of

the annual mean concentrations from 2008 through 2010 and a

listing of the design values base d on the three-year average of

the 98 th 

## percentile are shown in Table 1. The locations of the

monitoring sites for this nona ttainment area are shown on

Figure 2.

4 O perated by Ohio EPA Division of Air Pollu tion Control, Southeast District Office.

## D

F

Requir e

A mbien t

recorde d

for publi

D

O

a

O

t h

Requir e

A sho w

concent

affected

three c o D emonstra t

F igure 2 - M

a

e ment 2 of

t monitorin g

d in the U.

c view.

D emonstra t

O hio EPA

ccordance

O hio EPA h

h e data are

e ment 3 of

w ing that t h

rations, b a

downwind

o mplete, co n t ion

M ap of the

a nd Monit o

4

g data qu a

S. EPA ai r

t ion

has qualit

with 40 C

as record e

available t

4

h e three-y e

a sed on d a

environs,

n secutive c Steubenv

o r Locatio n

a lity assure

r quality s y

y assured

C FR 58.10

e d the data

t o the publi c

e ar avera g

a ta from al

are below 3

c alendar y e ille-Weirto

n s

d in accor d

y stem (AQ S

all data

and all o t

in the AQ S

c

.

g e of the 9

l monitori n

3 5 μ g/m 3



## . (

e ars of qual o n, OH-WV

d ance with

S ) databas e

shown in

t her feder a

S databas e

9 8 th 

## perce n

n g sites in

( This show

ity assured Nonattai n

40 CFR 5

e , and av a

Appendix

a l require m

e and, ther e

n tile of 2 4

the area

ing must r e

data.)

11 

## n ment Are a

5 8.10,

a ilable

A in

m ents.

e fore,

4 -hour

or its

e ly on a

### 12 

## Background

The following information is take n from U.S. EPA's "Guideline

on Data Handling Conventions for the PM NAAQS," U.S. EPA454/R-99-008, April 1999.

In accordance with the CAA Am endments, three complete years

of monitoring data are required to demonstrate attainment at a

monitoring site. The 24-hour PM 2.5 

## primary and secondary

ambient air quality standards are met at an ambient air quality

monitoring site when the three- year average of the 24-hour 98th

percentile values are less than or equal to 35 μ g/m 3 

## . While

calculating design values, one decim al place must be carried in

the computations, with final va lues rounded to the nearest 1

μ g/m 3 

## . Decimals 0. 5 or greater are rounded up, and those less

than 0. 5 are rounded dow n, so that 35.349 μ g/m 3 

## is the largest

concentration that is le ss than, or equal to 35 μ g/m 3 

## . Values at

or below 35 μ g/m 3 

## meet the standard; va lues greater than 35

μ g/m 3 

## exceed the standard. An area is in compliance with the

24-hour PM 2.5 

## NAAQS only if every monitoring site in the area

meets the NAAQS. An individual site's 3-year average of the 24-

hour 98th percentile concentrations is also called the site's

design value. The air quality des ign value for the area is the

highest design value among all sites in the area.

Table 1 shows the monitoring da ta for 2008 - 2010 that were

retrieved from t he U.S. EPA AQS.

### 13 

## Demonstration

Table 1 - Monitoring Data for the Steubenville-Weirton, OH-WV

area for 2008 – 2010

Annual Standard 24-Hour Standard

Year Average

2008-2010 Year Average

2008-2010 Site County 2008 2009 2010 2008 2009 2010

39-081-

0017 (a) Jefferson,

OH 14.3 12.1 12.7 13.0 35.2 24.7 29.8 30

39-081-

1001 14.1 11.2 12.7 12.7 35.0 23.3 25.1 28

54-009-

0005 Brooke,

WV 14.7 12.2 14.1 13.7 38.9 23.2 29.8 31

54-009-

0011 13.8 11.9 13.5 13.1 34.9 26.3 31.6 31

54-029-

1004 Hancock,

WV 13.3 11.2 12.6 12.4 35.8 25.2 31.2 31

Less than 75% capture in at least one quarter

(a) This site has a 73% capture, resulting in one day of missed data. Based on the data from previous

years, this site shows a decreasing tren in moni tor readings. Ohio believes that had the missing data

been collected it would not have resulted in a design value that would exceed the standard.

Source: U.S. EPA Air Quality System (AQS); http://www.epa.gov/ttn/air s/airsaqs/index.htm



## The design value calculated for the Steubenvill e-Weirton area

demonstrates that the 24-hour PM 2.5 

## NAAQS has been attained.

However, one monitor site in Jefferson County (site 39-081-0017), did

not comply with the 75% data captur e requirement for the 2008-2010

period. Specifically, the fourth quarter (October, November, and

December) of 2008 has only 73% c apture. This monitoring site

experienced instrument malfuncti on during the low percentage capture

missing a total of 8 missing 1-in-3 day PM2.5 FRM runs.

Under 40 CFR Part 50, A ppendix N, the use of less than complete data

may be approved by U.S. EPA consi dering such factors as monitoring

site closures/moves, monitoring diligence, and nearby concentrations

in determining whether to use such dat a. However, in order to further

demonstrate that this monitor has attained the standard, Ohio EPA

prepared a statistical analysis of the 24-hour standard using multiple

imputations. Ohio EPA has imputed missing values for this site and

then performed an ordinary analysis as if the imputed values were real

measurements. Multiple imputati ons use random draws from the

conditional distribution of the target variable given the other variables.

When a regression model is used for imputation, the process involves

adding a random residual to the “ best guess” for missing values, to

yield the same conditional variance as the original variable. Appendix

E describes, and includes, the full st atistical analyses performed to

show that the three-year av erage (2008 to 2010) of the 98 th 

## percentile

### 14 

## 24-hour values, based on missi ng data imputations, is 30 μ g/m 3 

## , below

the 35 μ g/m 3 

## 24-hour standard.

Table 2 shows site 39-081-0017 bef ore and after the imputation of

missing data. Also the “new” site (with imputed values) shows a

passing 24-hour design va lue for 2008 to 2010 of 30 μ g/m 3



## .

Table 2 - 98 th 

## Percentile and Design Value Before and After Imputation

With the data imputation analysis and results, Requirement 3 of 4 has

been met.

The area’s design values have trended downward as emissions have

declined due to cleaner automobiles and fuels, and controls for EGUs.

National monitoring for PM 2.5 

## began in 1999. There has been a clear

downward trend in design values for all monitors in Ohio and West

Virginia, as shown in Figures 3 and 4. Design values have also

trended downward nationally, as show in Figure 5. 39

‐ 081

‐ 0017 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2003

‐ 2005 2004

‐ 2006 2005

‐ 2007 2006

‐ 2008 2007

‐ 2009 2008

‐ 2010

OLD Creditable 17 104 94 115 111 106 112 108

OLD 98th 39.6 43.8 43.8 32.1 43.5 35.2 24.7 29.8

New Creditable 119 120 121 115 111 121 112 108

New 98th 30.4 43.9 40.3 32.1 43.5 35.2 24.7 29.8

less than 75% capture in at least one quarter

Year includes one or more quarters with imputed values 37 34 30

38 39 39 37 34 30 42 40 40 YEAR 24

‐ Hour Design Value

## F

S 

## F igure 3 - O

2

S ource: WVD 

## hio 24-H o

2 008-2010

EP: http://w w 

## o ur PM 2.5 

## :

w.epa.gov/ai

PM 2 

## Design V

rtrends/value

5dv2008201 

## alues 199 9

e s.html , from E

0Final.xls 

## 9 -2001 thr

xcel spread s

15 

## ough

heet:

## F

S



## F F igure 4 - W

T

S ource: WVD



## F igure 5 - P

Sourc e 

## W est Virgi n

T hrough 2 0

EP: http://w w



## P M 2.5 

## Mean

e :http://www.e p 

## n ia 24-Ho u

0 08-2010

w w.epa.gov/ai

PM 2



## National T

p a.gov/airtrend s 

## u r PM2.5 D

rtrends/value

2 5dv2008201



## T rends

s /pm.html 

## D esign Val

e s.html , from E

0Final.xls 

## ues: 1999

-

xcel spread s

16 

## 2001

heet:

### 17 

## Requirement 4 of 4

A commitment that once redesignated, th e state will continue to operate an

appropriate monitoring network to verify the maintenance of the attainment

status.

Demonstration

Ohio EPA commits to continue monitoring PM 2.5 

## levels at the

Ohio sites indicated in Figur e 2 and Table 1. Ohio EPA will

consult with U.S. EPA Region 5 pr ior to making changes to the

existing monitoring network, s hould changes become necessary

in the future. Ohio EPA will continue to quality assure the

monitoring data to meet the requ irements of 40 CFR 58 and all

other federal requirem ents. Connection to a central station and

updates to the Ohio EPA web site 5 

## will provide real time

availability of the data and knowledge of an y exceedances. Ohio

EPA will enter all data into AQS on a timely basis in accordance

with federal guidelines.

5 www.epa.ohio.gov/dapc

### 18 

# CHAPTER FOUR

EMISSION INVENTORY

CAA Section 107(d)(3)(E)(iii)

U.S. EPA’s redesignation guidance require s the submittal of a comprehensive

inventory of PM 2.5 

## precursor emissions (primary particles (organic carbon,

crustal matter, and elemental carbon), SO 2 

## and NO

x 6 

## ) representative of the

year when the area achieves attainment of the 24-hour PM 2.5 

## air quality

standard. Ohio also must demonstrate that the improvement in air quality

between the year that viol ations occurred and the ye ar that attainment was

achieved is based on permanent and enfo rceable emission reductions. Other

emission inventory related requirements include a projection of the emission

inventory to a year at least 10 year s following redesignati on; a demonstration

that the projected level of emissions is sufficient to main tain the 24-hour PM 2.5 

## standard; and a commitment to provide future updates of the inventory to

enable tracking of emission levels duri ng the 10-year main tenance period.

The emissions inventory development and emissions projection discussion

below, with the exception of the mobile (on-road) emissions inventory and

projections, identifies procedures used by Ohio EPA and the LADCO

regarding emissions from Oh io’s portion of the Steu benville-Weirton area.

Specific emissions data are provided for all counties, including those in Ohio

and West Virginia. West Virginia em issions data were obtained though the

West Virginia Department of Environment al Protection (WVDEP). All of these

inventories and emissions projections were prepared using similar

methodologies, unless otherwise noted. Mobile emissions inventories and

projections for all counties were pr epared by the Brooke-Hancock-Jefferson

Metropolitan Planning Commission (BHJ ) and the Ohio Department of

Transportation (ODOT), with data provid ed by Ohio EPA, West Virginia

Department of Transportation (WVDOT), and WVDEP.

Requirement 1 of 5

A comprehensive emission inventory of PM 2.5 

## , SO 2 

## and NO

x 

## completed for the

base year.

Background

The 2005 periodic inv entory has been identified as one of the

preferred databases for SIP dev elopment and coincides with

nonattainment air quality in t he Steubenville-Weirton area.

Periodic inventories, which incl ude emissions from all sectors

are prepared every three years by Ohio EPA. Ohio’s 2005

6 VOC and NH 3 are not addressed.

### 19 

## emissions data for all sources (E lectrical Generating Unit (EGUPoint); Non-Electrical Generat ing Unit (Non-EGU); Non-road

Mobile (Non-road); Other Area (A rea); and Marine; Aircraft; Rail

(MAR)) are derived from this invent ory. Ohio’s point source data

derived from this periodic invent ory is actual source reported

emissions under Ohio's annual emissions reporting program.

West Virginia’s point source data are taken from U.S. EPA’s

CSAPR estimates (EGU) and actual reported data under West

Virginia’s emissions reporting program (non-EGUs). West

Virginia’s emissions data for MA R and Area is derived from the

2005 National Emissions Inventory (NEI) while Non-road

emissions are derived from NO NROAD modeling conducted by

WVDAQ.

Demonstration

Ohio’s 2005 inventory is used as the base year for the purpose

of this submittal and was submi tted to U.S. EPA with Ohio’s

PM 2.5 

## attainment demonstration SI P submitted on July 18, 2008

and revised on June 7, 2010. The detailed emission inventory

information for Ohio’s portion of the Steubenville-Weirton area is

provided in Appendix B. Emissions of PM 2.5, 

## SO 2 

## and NO

x 

## for

2005 are identified under Requirem ent Three of this Chapter.

Requirement 2 of 5

A projection of the emissi on inventory to a year at least 10 years following

redesignation.

Background

Ohio EPA prepared a comprehensive inv entory for the Ohio portion of

the Steubenville-Weirton area includ ing area, mobile, and point

sources for PM 2.5 

## , SO 2 

## and NO

x 

## for base year 2005. The 2005

inventory was submitt ed to U.S. EPA on July 18, 2008 as part of

Ohio’s PM 2.5 

## attainment demonstration SIP for this area. The

information below describes the procedures Ohio EPA used to

generate the 2005 base year inv entory and to develop SIP-ready

modeling inventories and future year projections (Pechan Report 7 

## )

based on a 2005 base year inventory. The report by Pechan generated

future year estimates of annual emi ssions for each source sector using

accepted growth surrogates. These inventories were provided to the

LADCO and have been processed to develop average daily emissions

7

http://www.ladco.org/tech/emis/r5/reports/LA DCO%202005%20Base%20Yr%20Growth%20and%20Co

ntrols%20Report_Final.pdf

### 20 

## for use in the air quality analyses. These processed modeling

inventories have been identif ied as the correct iter ation of the inventory

for use in the redesignation. In this document, references to LADCO

include the Midwest Regional Planni ng Organization. Note, that the onroad mobile source sector was addressed by specific PM 2.5 

## and NO

x 

## modeling as discussed below.

• Area source and MAR emissions were taken from the

Ohio 2005 periodic inventory submitted to U.S. EPA.

These projections were made from the U.S. Department

of Commerce Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA)

growth factors, with some updated local information.

• Mobile source emissions were calculated from

MOVES2010 produced emission factors. Only PM 2.5 

## and

NO

x 

## necessitate an emissions inventory analysis. Ohio

EPA in consultation with U.S. EPA determined mobile

sources are insignific ant contributors for SO 2 

## . Consistent

with Ohio EPA’s attainment demonstration, Ohio EPA

continues to consider mobile source SO 2 

## to be an

insignificant contributor to fine particles for this

nonattainment area. Based on the results of mobile

source emissions projections prepared as part of this

redesignation and maintenance plan, Ohio EPA is also

making a finding that the r egional highway emissions

PM 2.5 

## and NO

x 

## are insignificant contributors to the

nonattainment problem in this area, as discussed below

• Point source information was compiled from Ohio EPA’s

2005 annual emissions inventory database and the 2005

U.S. EPA Air Markets acid rain database 8



## .

• Biogenic emissions are not included in these summaries.

• Non-road emissions were derived from NONROAD

modeling conducted by WVDA Q, as found in Appendix

D.

West Virginia emission projec tions were provided by the

WVDAQ as summarized below.

• Area source and MAR emissions were compiled from the

2008 NEI and 2015 and 2025 proj ections were grown

using Workforce data.

• Mobile source emissions we re calculated using the same

methodology as described above for Ohio’s portion.

• EGU point source information was compiled from U.S.

EPA’s CSAPR inventories.

8 http://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/acidrain

### 21 

## • Non-EGU point source information was compiled from

West Virginia’s 2008 act ual emissions inventory and

2015 and 2025 projections were grown using Workforce

data.

• Non-road emissions were derived from NONROAD

modeling conducted by WVDA Q, as found in Appendix

D.

Demonstration

On-Road Emission Estimations

The ODOT, Division of Transportation System DevelopmentModeling and Forecasting Sect ion and the Brooke-HancockJefferson Metropolitan Planning Commission (BHJ) defined the

underlying planning assump tions for the annual PM 2.5 

## on-road

mobile source emission invent ories for the Steubenville-Weirton,

OH-WV nonattainment area.

In coordination with the ODOT, BHJ utilizes a regional travel

demand forecast model to simulate traffic in the area and to

forecast traffic flows for given growth expectations. The model

is primarily used as a long rang e planning tool to evaluate the

transportation system including de termination of locations where

additional travel capacity may be needed and to determine the

infrastructure requirements necessa ry to meet that need. It is

also used as a tool for air qualit y purposes to estimate the total

emissions of pollution caused by vehicles in the area. The

travel demand forecasting model is used to predict traffic

volumes vehicle miles traveled (V MT), travel speeds, and a U.S.

EPA computer program called MOVES is used to calculate

emissions per mile. The product of these is the total amount of

pollution emitted by the on-road vehicles for the area.

Overview

U.S.EPA published a Feder al Register notice 9 

## of availability on

March 2, 2010, to approve MOVES2010 (Motor Vehicle

Emissions Simulator), hereafte r referred to as MOVES. Upon

publication of the Federal Regi ster notice, MOVES became U.S.

EPA’s approved motor vehicle emission factor model for

estimating VOCs, NO

x 

## , CO, PM 10 

## and PM 2.5 

## and other pollutants

and precursors from cars, trucks, motorcycles, and buses by

state and local agencies. MO VES is a computer program

designed by the U.S. EPA to es timate air pollution emissions

9 http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/ home.html#documentDetail?R=0900006480ab1f98

### 22 

## from mobile sources. MOVES r eplaces U.S. EPA’s previous

emissions model for on-road m obile sources, MOBILE6.2.

MOVES can be used to estimate exhaust and evaporative

emissions as well as brake and tire wear emissions from all

types of on-road vehicles.

The CAA requires U.S. EPA to regularly update its mobile

source emission models. U.S. EPA continuously collects data

and measures vehicle emissions to make sure the Agency has

the best possible understanding of mobile source emissions.

This assessment, in turn, informs the development of U.S.

EPA’s mobile source emissi on models. MOVES represents the

Agency’s most up-to-date assessm ent of on-road mobile source

emissions. MOVES also incorporates several changes to the

U.S. EPA’s approach to mobile source emission modeling

based upon recommendations m ade to the Agency by the

National Academy of Sciences.

U.S.EPA believes that MOVES s hould be used in ozone, CO,

PM, and nitrogen dioxide SIP devel opment as expeditiously as

possible. The CAA requires that SIP inventories and control

measures be based on the most current information and

applicable models that are avail able when a SIP is developed.

Regarding transportation conformi ty, U.S. EPA and U.S. DOT

intend to establish a two-year grace period before MOVES is

required for new transportati on conformity analyses.

The MOVES more detailed approa ch (when compared with the

previous MOBILE model) to mode ling allows U.S. EPA to easily

incorporate large amounts of in-u se data from a wide variety of

sources, such as data from vehicle inspection and maintenance

(I/M) programs, remote sens ing device (RSD) testing,

certification testing, portabl e emission measurement systems

(PEMS), etc. This approach also allows users to incorporate a

variety of activity data to bette r estimate emission differences

such as those resulting from changes to vehicle speed and

acceleration patterns. MOVES has a graphical user interface

which allows users to more easily set up and run the model.

MOVES database-centered design pr ovides users much greater

flexibility regarding output choice s. Unlike earlier models which

provided emission factors in gr ams-per-mile in fixed output

formats, MOVES output can be expressed as total mass (in

tons, pounds, kilograms, or gram s) or as emission factors

(grams-per-mile and in some ca ses grams-per-vehicle). Output

can be easily aggregated or disaggregated to examine

emissions in a range of scales, from national emissions impacts

### 23 

## down to the emissions impacts of individual transportation

projects. The database-centered des ign also allows U.S. EPA to

update emissions data incorporat ed in MOVES more easily and

will allow users to in corporate a much wider array of activity

data to improve estimation of loca l emissions. For example, the

improvements in MOVES will allow project-level PM2.5

emissions to be estimated.

BHJ utilized U.S.EPA’s emi ssions model MOVES to develop

emissions factors for SO 2 

## , NO

x 

## and PM 2.5 

## . Further details on the

use of MOVES are found on Append ix C. BHJ maintains a

validated region wide Travel Demand Model (TDM) that

employs a four-step modeling process consisting of trip

generation, trip distribution, mode choice, and route assignment.

The current BHJ TMD validation y ear is 2000. The model uses

comparable average daily tra ffic count data, updated socialeconomic variables for each of the analysis years by either

updating existing or known la nd use commitment for 2008,

2009, and 2014, or proj ected 2014 and 2020 va riables based on

a straight line extrapolation bet ween 2009 set of variables and

the Horizon Year 2030 variables . These networks represent all

planned federal-aid projects as well as any regionally significant

projects found in the BHJ TI P and LRTP expected to be open

for traffic by the end of each respective analysis year.

Identifying projected growth centers and understanding urban

and rural population changes are essential to determine future

transportation needs in a given st udy area. Travel forecasting

procedures require the user deli neates the TDM study area into

geographic areas called Traffic A nalysis Zones. Typically, these

Zones are based on factors su ch as land use, area types

(urban, suburban or rural), or polit ical government units such as

cities, villages, or townships. The BHJ collects and reviews the

TDM independent variables that c haracterize current and future

estimates of the metropolitan area’s social and economic

activities that may influence land use development patterns.

The following categories of planning data are utilized:

- Population.

- Households.

- Household vehicles.

- Employment.

- Labor force participation.

- Area type.

The principal data requirement s of the BHJ travel demand

### 24 

## forecasting model are population and employment, from these

variables other characteristics including household, labor force,

and personal vehicles may be derived.

BHJ utilizes both base year (2005) and future year data (2010,

2020 and 2030) in the planning process. Planning data are

maintained at the Traffic A nalysis Zone (TAZ) level, and

originate in the 2000 Census of Populati on and Housing. Base

year 2005 and future yare data for each variable are developed

through various methods. T he MOVES model generated the

emissions factor files for bas e year 2005 and attainment year

2008 representing transportati on improvement programs

implemented in the BHJ Region . The model also generated

emission factors for two futu re year scenarios 2015 and 2025.

The single season approach fo r temperature and relative

humidity uses weather data collected by the National Oceanic

and Atmospheric Administration (N OAA) National Climatic Data

Center (NCDC). The data used in this report, taken from the

Pittsburgh International Airport collection center, is

representative of 12 months in 2009.

BHJ and ODOT incorporates a vari ety of sources of local data to

both improve and confirm the accura cy of VMT, as well as other

travel-related parameters. Free flow speeds used on the

highway and transit networks are based on travel time studies

performed locally. A BHJ post -processing program uses the

loaded highway network to gen erate VMT by hour, VMT by

speed distribution, and VMT by fa cility type. These tables are

then included as input into MOVES.

On-Road Mobile Emission Estimations

Tables 2 through 8 contain the result s of the emissions analysis for the

appropriate years. All emissions esti mations are expressed in tons per

year (tpy).

### 25

## Table 3 - Jefferson County, OH, Emissions Estimations for OnRoad Mobile Sources

2005 2008 2015 2025

PM 2.5 

### (tpy) 73.17 60.97 31.88 16.49

NO

x 

### (tpy) 2105.85 1758.04 870.17 322.71

SO 2 

### (tpy) 18.18 5.65 3.93 3.56

Annual VMT 562,071,084 557,286,295 544,597,475 572,657,778



## Table 4 – Summary of Ohio Emi ssions Estimations for On-Road

Mobile Sources

2005 2008 2015 2025

PM 2.5 

### (tpy) 73.17 60.97 31.88 16.49

NO

x 

### (tpy) 2105.85 1758.04 870.17 322.71

SO 2 

### (tpy) 18.18 5.65 3.93 3.56

Annual VMT 562,071,084 557,286,295 544,597,475 572,657,778



## Table 5 – Brooke County, WV, Emissions Estimations for OnRoad Mobile Sources

2005 2008 2015 2025

PM 2.5 

### (tpy) 19.41 14.42 6.97 4.34

NO

x 

### (tpy) 540.40 412.02 174.71 62.47

SO 2 

### (tpy) 7.01 2.11 1.51 1.26

Annual VMT 212,244,639 212,778,859 219,881,355 216,619,184



## Table 6 – Hancock County, WV, Emissions Estimations for OnRoad Mobile Sources

2005 2008 2015 2025

PM 2.5 

### (tpy) 18.63 13.51 6.53 4.10

NO

x 

### (tpy) 482.75 360.25 149.00 52.09

SO 2 

### (tpy) 6.58 1.92 1.36 1.10

Annual VMT 180,767,718 177,219,697 180,298,107 174,534,361

### 26 

## Table 7 – Summary of West Virg inia Emissions Estimations for

On-Road Mobile Sources

2005 2008 2015 2025

PM 2.5 

### (tpy) 38.04 27.93 13.5 8.44

NO

x 

### (tpy) 1023.15 772.27 323.71 114.56

SO 2 

### (tpy) 13.59 4.03 2.87 2.36

Annual VMT 393,012,357 389,998,556 400,179,462 390,998,315



## Table 8 – Emissions Estimation s Totals for On-Road Mobile

Sources for the Steubenville-Weirton Area

2005 2008 2015 2025

PM 2.5 

### (tpy) 111.21 88.9 45.38 24.93

NO

x 

### (tpy) 3129 2530.31 1193.88 437.27

SO 2 

### (tpy) 31.77 9.68 6.80 5.92

Annual VMT 955,083,441 947,284,851 944,776,937 963,656,093



## The following table identifies the perc entage of mobile emissions of all

emissions, for each pollutant in the entire Steubenvi lle-Weirton area

and Ohio’s portion of this area for 2015 and 2025.

Table 9 – Percent of Mobile Emissions for the SteubenvilleWeirton Area in 2015 and 2025

NO

x SO 2 PM 2.5

2015 2025 2015 2025 2015 2025

Steubenville

‐

Weirton

Area Total (tpy) 

### 25,563.36 17,533.17 74,806.60 47,445.13 2,740.52 2,698.00

Mobile (tpy) 

### 1,193.88 437.27 6.80 5.92 45.38 24.93

% Mobile 

### 4.67% 2.49% 0.009% 0.012% 1.66% 0.92%

Ohio Portion Total (tpy) 

### 22,883.61 15,237.65 73,080.25 45,861.72 2,005.04 1,997.72

Mobile (tpy) 

### 870.17 322.71 3.93 3.56 31.88 16.49

% Mobile 

### 3.80% 2.12% 0.005% 0.008% 1.59% 0.83%



## NO

x 

## constitutes less than five percent (4.67%) of the

area’s total NO

x 

## emissions in the 2015 horizon year and

less than three percent (2. 49%) of the area’s total NO

x 

## emissions in the 2025 horizon year.

SO 2 

## constitutes less than one percent (<1%) of the area’s

total SO 2 

## emissions in the 2015 and 2025 horizon years.

PM 2.5 

## constitutes less than two percent (1.66%) of the

area’s total PM 2.5 

## emissions in the 2015 horizon year and

### 27 

## less than one percent (0.92% ) of the area’s total PM 2.5 

## emissions in the 2025 horizon year.

Therefore, the Ohio EPA is herein making a finding that the area’s

highway emissions for PM 2.5 

## , NO

x 

## , and SO 2 

## are insignificant

contributors to the nonattainment problem of the Steubenville-Weirton

area, as agreed upon as a part of the interagency consultation

process. Because of this finding it is not necessary to establish mobile

emission budgets for this area in the 2015 and 2025 horizon years.

The nonattainment area meets the 40 CFR 93.109(m) criteria for

PM2.5, NO

x 

## , and SO 2 

## . Throughout this document, Ohio EPA

demonstrates that it would be unreasonable to expect that the

Steubenville-Weirton area would experience enough motor vehicle

emissions growth in PM2.5, NO

x 

## , and SO 2 

## for a PM 2.5 

## NAAQS violation

to occur. Moreover, Ohio EPA dem onstrates that the percentage of

motor vehicle emissions in the contex t of the total SIP inventory, the

current state of air quality as determined by monitoring data, the

absence of SIP motor vehicle contro l measures, and historical trends

and future projections of the growth of motor vehicle emissions, are

evidence enough to consider mobile source PM2.5, NO

x 

## , and SO 2 

## insignificant contribut ors to fine particles.

Requirement 3 of 5

A demonstration that t he projected level of emissions is sufficient to maintain

the PM 2.5 

## standard.

Background

In consultation with U.S. EPA, Oh io EPA selected the year 2025

as the maintenance year for this redesignation request. This

document contains projected emissions inventories for 2015

and 2025.

Emission projections for the Steubenville-Weirton area were

performed using the following approaches:

• As performed by ODOT and BHJ, mobile source

emission projections are bas ed on the U.S. EPA MOVES

model. The analysis is described in more detail in

Appendix C. All pr ojections were made in accordance

with “Procedures for Preparing Emissions Projections”

U.S. EPA-45/4-91-019. As di scussed above, it was

determined that the mobile emission contribution as a

percent of the total emission inventory from the area is

not significant.

### 28 

## • Emissions inventories are r equired to be projected to

future dates to assess the influence growth and future

controls will have. LADCO has developed growth and

control files for point and ar ea categories. These files

were used to develop Ohio’s portion of this

nonattainment area future-year emissions estimates used

in this document. This was done so the inventories used

for redesignation are consis tent with mode ling performed

in the future. Appendix D contains LADCO’s technical

support document detailing the analysis used to project

emissions (Base M 10 

## ).

• For the 2008 attainment year emissions were grown from

the 2005 LADCO modeling inv entory, using LADCO’s

growth factors, for all se ctors except point sources

(electrical generating units and non-electrical generating

units). Point source emissions for 2008 were compiled

from Ohio EPA’s 2008 Annual emissions inventory

database. The 2015 interim year emissions were

estimated based on the 2009 and 2018 LADCO modeling

inventory, using LADCO’s grow th factors, for all sectors

except non-EGU PM 2.5 

## . The 2025 maintenance year is

based on emissions estimate s from the 2018 LADCO

modeling, for all sect ors except non-EGU PM 2.5 

## . NonEGU PM 2.5 

## emissions for 2015 and 2025 were grown

from 2005 and 2009 emissions estimates.

Ohio EPA is identifying emissions projections for 2015 and 2025

for EGUs with implementation of the CAIR program. U.S. EPA

has raised concerns regardi ng the CAIR program and its

remand. However, Ohio EPA believes these are the most

appropriate and accurate future projections. Although CSAPR

has been stayed by the D.C. Circ uit Court (December 30, 2011),

the Court has ordered U.S. EPA to continue administering CAIR

pending the court’s resolution. It is believed that CSAPR will

provide even greater reductions in emissions than the CAIR

program once resolved; therefore, these em issions projections

will be conservative.

On March 10, 2004, the U.S. EPA promulgated the CAIR.

Beginning in 2009, U.S. EPA’s CA IR rule requires EGUs in 28

eastern states and the District of Columbia to significantly

reduce emissions of NO

x 

## and SO 2 

## . CAIR replaced the NOx SIP

Call for EGUs. The intent of the CAIR program is for national

10 http://www.ladco.org/tech /emis/current/index.php

### 29 

## NO

x 

## emissions to be cut from 4.5 million tons in 2004, to a cap

of 1.5 million tons by 2009, and 1.3 million tons in 2018 in 28

states. States were required to submit a CAIR SIP as part of

this effort. Ohio submitted a CAIR SIP which was approved by

U.S. EPA on February 1, 2007. Re visions to the CAIR SIP were

again submitted on July 15, 2009. The revised CAIR SIP was

approved as a direct final acti on on September 25, 2009 (74 FR

48857). As a result of CAIR, U.S. EPA projects that in 2009

emissions of NO

x 

## will decrease from a baseline of 264,000 tons

per year to 93,000 tons per year while in 2010 emissions of SO 2



## will decrease from a baseline of 1,373,000 tons per year to

298,000 tons per year, within Oh io. And by 2015 U.S. EPA

projects emissions of NO

x 

## will decrease to 83,000 tons per year

while emissions of SO 2 

## will decrease to 208,000 tons per year,

within Ohio 11 

## . On December 23, 2008, U.S. EPA’s CAIR

program was remanded without va catur by the D.C. Circuit

Court.

As can be seen in Tabl e 9 below, Ohio has seen a significant

decline in the 264, 000 tons of NO

x 

## and 1,373,000 tons of SO 2



## emitted in 2005. In 2008 and 20 09 facilities began preparing for

and implementing control programs to address CAIR 12 

## and

consent decrees.

Table 10 - Reductions in SO 2 

## and NO

x 

## EGU Emissions

Between 2008 and 2009

SO 2 

### NO

x 

### 2008 2009 Change 2008 2009 Change

Ohio 709,444 601,101 15% 235,018 96,351 59%

LADCO States 2,019,036 1,620,071 20% 702,384 393,930 44%

National 7,616,262 5,747,353 25% 2,996,287 1,990,385 34%



### Source: Clean Air Markets Quarterly Emissions Tracking 13



## Significant reductions also occurr ed regionally and nationally as

can be seen from the abov e table. Data is al so available for the

first two quarters of 2010, the year SO 2 

## reductions are to be

implemented under CAIR:

11 http://www.epa.gov/CAIR/oh.html

12 Under CAIR, NOx reductions are to occur begin ning in 2009 while SO2 reductions are to occur

beginning in 2010.

13 http://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/quarterlytracking.html

### 30 

## Table 11 – Reductions in SO 2 

## and NO

x 

## EGU Emissions

Between the First Half of 2008 and 2010

SO 2 

### NO

x 

### 2008

(1 st 

### half) 2010

(1 st 

### half) Change 2008

(1 st 

### half) 2010

(1 st 

### half) Change

Ohio 373,798 279,854 25% 130,598 53,187 59%

LADCO States 1,190,497 854,282 28% 419,114 220,907 47%

National 3,895,472 2,502,965 36% 1,487,179 930,148 37%

Source: Clean Air Markets Quarterly Emissions Tracking 14



## The following was reported by U.S. EPA’s Clean Markets

Division:

“Based on emissions monito ring data, EPA has observed

substantial reductions in SO 2 

## emissions from 2005 to 2009 and

in the first two quarters of 2010 as companies installed more

controls, electric demand declin ed, and low natural gas prices

made combined-cycle gas-fired units more competitive in

several parts of the country. Thus, even after CAIR's vacatur

and subsequent remand in late 2008, the controls in place

generally have continued to operate , helping to drive continued

progress in reducing emissions. 15 

## ”

Ohio EPA is in agree ment with the analysis by U.S.EPA that the

CAIR program is providing real reductions at this time, Ohio

believes these reductions have assisted with PM 2.5 

## attainment in

this nonattainment area and throughout Ohio.

On July 6, 2011, U.S. EPA finali zed a replacement to the CAIR

program, the CSAPR. CSAPR woul d preserve those initial

reductions achieved under CA IR and provide even greater

reductions in NO

x 

## and SO 2 

## emissions in 2012 and 2014, ahead

of the 2015 CAIR Phase 2. As a result of CSAPR, U.S. EPA

projected that in 20 12 emissions of NO

x 

## will decrease to 90,842

tons per year and in 2014 to 85,744 tons per year while SO 2 

## will

decrease to 304,022 tons per y ear in 2012 and 134,333 tons

per year in 2014, within Ohio. In addition, U.S. EPA projections

indicated that as a result of implementation of CSAPR, there will

be no maintenance issues within this entire nonattainment area.

However, on December 30, 2011, t he D.C. Circuit Court stayed

CSAPR and ordered U.S. EPA to continue administering CAIR

pending the court’s resolution.

Therefore, it is Ohio EPA’s be lief it is most appropriate to

evaluate Ohio EPA’s demonstration that the projected level of

14 http://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/quarterlytracking.html

15 http://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/background.htm

### 31 

## emissions is sufficient to maintain the 24-hour PM 2.5 

## standard by

assessing future year emissions that include the CAIR program.

The detailed inventory information for the Ohio portion of the

Steubenville-Weirton area for 2005 is in Appendix B. Emission

trends are an important gauge for continued compliance with

the PM 2.5 

## standard. Therefore, Ohio EPA performed an initial

comparison of the inventor ies for the base year and

maintenance years. Mobile so urce emission inventories are

described in Appendix C.

Sectors included in the follow ing tables are: Electrical

Generating Unit (EGU-Point); N on-Electrical Generating Unit

(Non-EGU); Non-road Mobile (N on-road); Other Area (Area);

Marine, Aircraft, Rail (MAR); and On-road Mobile (On-road).

Maintenance is demonstrated when the future-year (2025)

projected emission totals are be low the 2008 atta inment year

totals.

Demonstration

PM 2.5



## The 2005 and 2 008 actual PM 2.5 

## emissions data below generally

contains particulate fraction emi ssions only and not the condensable

fractions as Ohio EPA did not have a consistent r eporting requirement

during those years. U.S. EPA IP M modeling was used to generate

future year EGU emissions with t he CAIR program. The IPM modeling

added additional PM 2.5 

## condensable emissions into future years.

Therefore, comparing base and atta inment year emissions with the

future year predictions is not accura te in the IPM CAIR modeling. This

step leads to a false perc eption of significant PM 2.5 

## emissions growth.

Modeling performed by LADCO, without CAIR, did not incorporate

added condensable fraction emissions. Although Ohio EPA has stated

that it is most appropriate to ev aluate future year emissions that

include the CAIR program, because of th is flaw it will be more accurate

and appropriate for the purposes of PM 2.5 

## to evaluate future year

emissions without t he CAIR program.

### 32 

## Table 12 - Jefferson County, Ohio PM 2.5 

## Emission Inventory

Totals for Base Year 2005, Estimated 2008, and

Projected 2015 and 2025 (tpy) – Without CAIR

Sector 2005 Base 2008

Attainment 2015

Interim 2025

Maintenance Safety

Margin

EGU Point 

### 1,307.90 1,372.80 1,405. 39 1,449.64 -76.84

Non-EGU 

### 461.57 461.42 437.63 413.69 47.73

Non-road 

### 24.30 22.50 17.15 11.25 11.25

Area 

### 110.12 110.60 108.49 105.97 4.63

MAR 

### 8.07 7.25 4.50 0.68 6.57

On-road 

### 73.17 60.97 31.88 

### 16.49 44.48

TOTAL 

### 1,985.13 2,035.54 2,005.04 1,997.72 37.82



## Table 13 - Brooke County, West Virginia PM 2.5 

## Emission

Inventory Totals for Base Year 2005, Estimated 2008,

and Projected 2015 and 2025 (tpy) – With CSAPR

Sector 2005 Base 2008

Attainment 2015

Interim 2025

Maintenance Safety

Margin

EGU Point 

### 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Non-EGU 

### 155.12 166.68 155.84 141.59 25.09

Non-road 

### 11.04 9.46 6.47 3.76 5.70

Area 

### 208.48 219.93 217.55 216.00 3.93

MAR 

### 17.07 3.85 3.87 3.91 -0.06

On-road 

### 19.41 14.42 6.97 4.34 10.08

TOTAL 

### 411.12 414.34 390.70 369.60 44.74



## Table 14 - Hancock County, West Virginia PM 2.5 

## Emission

Inventory Totals for Base Year 2005, Estimated 2008,

and Projected 2015 and 2025 (tpy) – With CSAPR

Sector 2005 Base 2008

Attainment 2015

Interim 2025

Maintenance Safety

Margin

EGU Point 

### 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Non-EGU 

### 182.02 90.97 83.84 74.81 16.16

Non-road 

### 9.61 8.20 5.57 3.10 5.10

Area 

### 313.70 232.96 230.26 229.92 3.04

MAR 

### 26.18 18.46 18.58 18.75 -0.29

On-road 

### 18.63 13.51 6.53 4.10 9.41

TOTAL 

### 550.14 364.10 344.78 330.68 33.42

### 33 

## Table 15 – Steubenville-Weirton Area PM 2.5 

## Emission Inventory

Totals for Base Year 2005, Estimated 2008, and

projected 2015 and 2025 (tpy) – Without CAIR (Ohio)

and With CSAPR (West Virginia)

PM2.5 2005 Base 2008

Attainment 2015

Interim 2025

Maintenance Safety

Margin



### Jefferson 1,985.13 2,035.54 2,005.04 1,997.72 37.82



### Hancock, WV 550.14 364.10 344.78 330.68 33.42



### Brooke, WV 411.12 414.34 390.70 369.60 44.74

COMBINED

PM 2.5 

### TOTAL 

### 2,946.39 2,813.98 2,740.52 2,698.00 115.98



## NO

x



## Table 16 - Jefferson County, Ohio NO

x 

## Emission Inventory Totals

for Base Year 2005, Estima ted 2008, and Projected

2015 and 2025 (tpy) – With CAIR

Sector 2005

Base 2008

Attainment 2015 Interim 2025

Maintenance Safety

Margin

EGU Point 

### 41,046.61 35,486.86 19,488.27 12,631.73 22,855.13

Non-EGU 

### 1,991.85 1,991.96 1,938.71 1,863.75 128.21

Non-road 

### 234.30 207.68 131.49 96.59 111.09

Area 

### 251.38 253.45 252.46 251.93 1.52

MAR 

### 317.3 300.96 202.51 70.94 230.02

On-road 

### 2,105.85 1,758.04 870.17 322.71 1,435.33

TOTAL 

### 45,947.29 39,998.95 22,883.61 15,237.65 24,761.30



## Table 17 - Brooke County, West Virginia NO

x 

## Emission Inventory

Totals for Base Year 2005, Estimated 2008, and

Projected 2015 and 2025 (tpy) – With CSAPR

Sector 2005 Base 2008

Attainment 2015

Interim 2025

Maintenance Safety

Margin

EGU Point 

### 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Non-EGU 

### 692.76 789.79 742.21 679.29 110.50

Non-road 

### 204.75 169.37 88.18 59.17 110.20

Area 

### 311.36 119.10 117.87 116.12 2.98

MAR 

### 444.99 112.83 113.54 114.56 -1.73

On-road 

### 540.40 412.02 174.71 62.47 349.55

TOTAL 

### 2,194.26 1,603.11 1,236.51 1,031.61 571.50

### 34 

## Table 18 - Hancock County, West Virginia NO

x 

## Emission Inventory

Totals for Base Year 2005, Estimated 2008, and

Projected 2015 and 2025 (tpy) – With CSAPR

Sector 2005 Base 2008

Attainment 2015

Interim 2025

Maintenance Safety

Margin

EGU Point 

### 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Non-EGU 

### 1,181.15 574.68 524.80 462.67 112.01

Non-road 

### 135.47 119.41 74.58 51.49 67.92

Area 

### 1,446.78 158.02 156.60 154.58 3.44

MAR 

### 695.36 534.89 538.26 543.08 -8.19

On-road 

### 482.75 360.25 149.00 52.09 308.16

TOTAL 

### 3,941.51 1,747.25 1,443.24 1,263.91 483.34



## Table 19 - Steubenville-Weirton Area NO

x 

## Emission Inventory

Totals for Base Year 2005, Estimated 2008, and

Projected 2015 and 2025 (tpy) – With CAIR (Ohio) and

With CSAPR (West Virginia)

NOx 2005

Base 2008

Attainment 2015

Interim 2025

Maintenance Safety

Margin



### Jefferson 45,947.29 39,998.95 22,883.61 15,237.65 24,761.30



### Hancock, WV 3,941.51 1,747.25 1,443.24 1,263.91 483.34



### Brooke, WV 2,194.26 1,603.11 1,236.51 1,031.61 571.50

COMBINED

NOx TOTAL 

### 52,083.06 43,349.31 25,563.36 17,533.17 25,816.14



## SO 2



## Table 20 - Jefferson County, Ohio SO 2 

## Emission Inventory Totals

for Base Year 2005, Estima ted 2008, and Projected

2015 and 2025 (tpy) – With CAIR

Sector 2005 Base 2008

Attainment 2015

Interim 2025

Maintenance Safety

Margin

EGU Point 

### 225,594.94 135,506.74 72,203.22 45,073.14 90,433.60

Non-EGU 

### 849.92 782.87 757.91 692.85 90.02

Non-road 

### 17.31 3.09 0.40 0.45 2.64

Area 

### 110.89 109.15 101.75 91.69 17.46

MAR 

### 26.16 21.61 13.04 0.48 21.13

On-road 

### 18.18 5.65 3.93 3.56 2.09

TOTAL 

### 226,617.40 136,429.11 73,080.25 45,862.17 90,566.94

### 35 

## Table 21 - Brooke County, West Virginia SO 2 

## Emission Inventory

Totals for Base Year 2005, Estimated 2008, and

Projected 2015 and 2025 (tpy) – With CSAPR

Sector 2005 Base 2008

Attainment 2015

Interim 2025

Maintenance Safety

Margin

EGU Point 

### 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Non-EGU 

### 620.55 766.54 718.43 654.91 111.63

Non-road 

### 12.13 2.17 0.27 0.30 1.87

Area 

### 167.98 163.76 156.62 146.42 17.34

MAR 

### 20.32 6.34 6.38 6.44 -0.10

On-road 

### 7.01 2.11 1.51 1.26 0.85

TOTAL 

### 827.99 940.92 883.21 809.33 131.59



## Table 22 - Hancock County, West Virginia SO 2 

## Emission Inventory

Totals for Base Year 2005, Estimated 2008, and

Projected 2015 and 2025 (tpy) – With CSAPR

Sector 2005 Base 2008

Attainment 2015

Interim 2025

Maintenance Safety

Margin

EGU Point 

### 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Non-EGU 

### 1,480.85 613.04 572.55 519.57 93.47

Non-road 

### 9.72 1.73 0.21 0.23 1.50

Area 

### 728.92 248.63 237.35 221.22 27.41

MAR 

### 32.27 31.47 31.67 31.96 -0.49

On-road 

### 6.58 1.92 1.36 1.10 0.82

TOTAL 

### 2,258.34 896.79 843.14 774.08 122.71



## Table 23 - Steubenville-Weirton Area SO 2 

## Emission Inventory

Totals for Base Year 2005, Estimated 2008, and

Projected 2015 and 2025 (tpy) – With CAIR (Ohio) and

With CSAPR (West Virginia)

SO2 2005 Base 2008

Attainment 2015

Interim 2025

Maintenance Safety

Margin



### Jefferson 226,617.40 136,429.11 73,080.25 45,862.17 90,566.94



### Hancock, WV 2,258.34 896.79 843.14 774.08 122.71



### Brooke, WV 827.99 940.92 883.21 809.33 131.59

COMBINED

SO2 TOTAL 

### 229,703.73 138,266.82 74,806.60 47,445.58 90,821.24

### 36 

## PM 2.5 

## , NO

x 

## , and SO 2



## Table 24 - Steubenville-Weirt on Area Comparison of 2008

Attainment Year and 2015 and 2025 Projected

Emission Estimates (tpy)

2008 Base 2015

Interim 2015

Projected

Decrease 2025

Maintenance 2025

Projected

Decrease

PM 2.5 

### 2,813.98 2,740.52 73.46 2,698.00 115.98

NO

x 

### 43,349.31 25,563.36 17,785.95 17,533.17 25,816.14

SO 2 

### 138,266.82 74,806.60 63,460.22 47,445.58 90,821.24



## As shown in the table above (Table 23), PM 2.5 

## emissions in the

nonattainment area are projected to decrease by 73.46 tpy in

2015 and 115.98 tpy in 2025. NO

x 

## emissions in the

nonattainment area are projected to decrease by 17,785.95 tpy

in 2015 and 25,816.14 tpy in 2025. SO 2 

## emissions in the

nonattainment area are projected to decline by 63,460.22 tpy in

2015 and 90,821.24 tpy in 2025.

In general, EGU source emissions, and to a lesser extent, area

source emissions and Non-EG U source emissions show a

decrease. Cleaner vehicles an d fuels are expected to be in

place in 2009 and 201 8, and the CSAPR will be implemented in

2012 and 2014 and these programs should cause an overall

drop in all three pollutants emi ssions. Decreases from U.S. EPA

rules covering EGUs, Tier 2 Mo tor Vehicle Emissions Standards

and Gasoline Sulfur C ontrol Requirements 16 

## , Highway HeavyDuty Engine Rule 17 

## , and the Non-Road Diesel Engine Rule 18 

## are

factored into the changes.

In addition to the above, the Cardinal Station (AEP) in

Jefferson County implemented changes in late 2007 and early

2008. Two units, #1 and #2 (each 600 megawatt) installed and

began continuously operating sc rubbers, and a restricted SO 2



## allowable emission rate was in corporated into a federally

enforceable permit demonstrati ng they will not cause or

contribute to a violation of a NAAQS and/or Prevention of

Significant Deterioration incr ement violation based upon air

dispersion modeling. These scrubbers began operating in

December 2007 and March 2008. 19 

## Also these two units were

required by a federally enforc eable consent decree to operate

16 http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA- AIR/2000/February/Da y-10/a19a.htm

17 http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-AI R/1997/October/Day-21/a27494.htm

18 http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA- AIR/1998/October/Day -23/a24836.htm

19 The lower rates will be incorporated into the fa cility’s Title V operating permit at renewal.

### 37 

## their SNCR continuously to control and reduce NOx emissions

by January 2009. Moreover, unit #3 (630 megawatt) is

undergoing construction for the installation of a scrubber, to

control SO 2 

## emissions in the future. The permit-to-install these

scrubbers will require a restricted SO 2 

## allowable emission rate.

The scrubbers will begin operating by January 2012 in

accordance with their federally enforceable consent decree.

Similar to unit #1 and #2, unit #3 was required by a federally

enforceable consent decree to operate SNCR continuously to

control and reduce NOx emissions by January 2009.

Requirement 4 of 5

A demonstration that improvement in air quality bet ween the year violations

occurred and the year attainment wa s achieved is bas ed on permanent and

enforceable emission r eductions and not on temporary adverse economic

conditions or unusually favorable meteorology.

Background

Ambient air quality data fr om all monitoring sites indicate that air

quality met the NAAQS for PM 2.5 

## in 2008-2010. U.S. EPA’s

redesignation guidance (p 9) st ates: “A state may generally

demonstrate maintenance of the NAAQS by either showing that future

emissions of a pollutant or its precursors will not exceed the level of

the attainment inventory, or by modeling to show that the future mix of

sources and emissions rates will not c ause a violation of the NAAQS.”

Demonstration

Permanent and enforceable reductions of PM 2.5 

## , NO

x 

## , and SO 2



## emissions have contributed to the attainment of the 24-hour PM 2.5



## standard. Some of these reducti ons were realized due to the

application of tighter federal standar ds on non-road diesel vehicles

(Clean Air Non-road Diesel Rule) and t he application of tighter federal

standards on new vehicles. Also Title IV of the CAA, the NO

x 

## SIP Call,

CAIR, and federal consent decrees required the reductions of SO 2 

## and

NO

x 

## emissions from utility source s. Reductions achieved are

discussed in greater de tail under Chapter Five.

### 38 

## Table 25 - Steubenville-Weirton Area Comparison of 2005 Base

Year and 2008 Attainment Ye ar On-Road, Non-Road

and EGU Reductions

2005 2008

On-road PM 2.5 

### 111.21 88.90

On-road NO

x 

### 3,129.00 2,530.31

On-road SO 2 

### 31.77 9.68

Non-road PM 2.5 

### 44.95 40.16

Non-road NO

x 

### 574.51 496.47

Non-road SO 2 

### 39.16 6.99

EGU PM 2.5 

### 1,307.90 1,372.80

EGU NO

x 

### 41,046.61 35,486.86

EGU SO 2 

### 225,594.94 135,506.74



## Requirement 5 of 5

Provisions for future annual updates of the inventory to enable tracking of the

emission levels, including an annual emi ssion statement from major sources.

Demonstration

In Ohio, major point sources in all counties are required to

submit air emissions informati on annually, in accordance with

U.S. EPA’s Consolidated Emissions Reporting Rule (CERR).

Ohio EPA prepares a new periodic inventory for all PM 2.5 

## precursor emission sectors ev ery three years. These PM 2.5 

## precursor inventories will be prepared for future years as

necessary to comply with the inventory reporting requirements

established in the CFR. Emissi ons information will be compared

to the 2005 base year and the 20 25 projected maintenance year

inventories to assess emission trends, as necessary, and to

assure continued compliance with the 24-hour PM 2.5 

## standard.

### 39 

# CHAPTER FIVE

CONTROL MEASURES AND REGULATIONS

CAA Section107 (d)(3)(E)(ii), 107( d)(3)(iv), and 107(d)(3)(E)(v)

Requirement 1 of 6

Section 172(c)(1) of t he 1990 Clean Air Act Amendmen ts requires states with

nonattainment areas to implement RACM and RACT.

Background

Section 172(c)(1) of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments

requires states with nonattainm ent areas to submit a SIP

providing for implementation of all reasonably available control

measures and as expeditiously as practicable (including such

reductions in emissions from ex isting sources in the area as

may be obtained through the adopti on, at a minimum, of

reasonable available control technology).

U.S. EPA’s 1997 Im plementation Rule interprets this

requirement in great detail. U nder U.S. EPA’s approach, RACT

is determined as part of th e broader RACM analysis and

identification of all measures (f or stationary, mobile, and area

sources) that are technically a nd economically f easible, and that

would collectively contribute to advancing the attainment date

(i.e. by one year or more). States are required to use a

combined approach to RACT and RACM, that (1) identifies

potential measures that are r easonable, (2) uses modeling to

identify the attainment date that is as expeditious as practicable,

and (3) selects the appropriate RACT and RACM.

The 1997 Implementation Rule also provides for a presumption

that in States that fulfill th eir CAIR emission reduction

requirements, EGU compliance with CAIR is equivalent to

RACM/RACT.

Demonstration

In 1972, 1980, and 1991, Ohio pr omulgated rules requiring

reasonably available controls measures for particulate

emissions from stati onary sources.

Statewide RACT rules have been applied to all new sources

locating in Ohio since that time. RACT requirements are

incorporated into permits along with monitoring, recordkeeping,

and reporting necessary to ensure ongoing compliance. Ohio

EPA also has an active enf orcement program to address

### 40 

## violations discovered by field offi ce staff. The Ohio RACT rules

for particulate matter are found in OAC Chapter 3745-17 20



## .

In addition, Ohio EPA promulgated NO

x 

## SIP Call rules (OAC

Chapter 3745-14 21 

## ), CAIR (OAC Chapter 3745-109 22 

## ), and NO

x 

## Reasonably Available Control Te chnology rules (OAC Chapter

3745-110 23 

## ) over the past five year s. Emissions from EGUs

make up a significant contribution to Ohio’s inventory. Beginning

in 2009, Ohio implemented CAIR which has, and will, provide

for significant reductions in NO

x 

## , PM 2.5 

## , and SO 2 

## until such time

CSAPR is implemented. Then the CSAPR will provide for even

greater reductions.

As part of a larger initiative, LADCO, in consultation with two

contractors, performed a series of studies exploring control

measures for reducing bot h ozone precursors and PM 2.5 

## precursors in Ohio, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, and Wisconsin

area. The first consultant, MACTEC, prepared a series of white

papers 24 

## researching different stati onary source categories. The

results were compiled into two reports 25 

## . The second consultant,

Environ, investigated control options for mobile sources. The

results were compiled into two reports 26 

## . The stationary and

mobile source sectors (and asso ciated control measures) were

selected by the LADCO States based on several factors

presented in the report (See Chapter 2).

Photochemical modeling was then conducted (as part of

LADCO Round 4 modeling) to asse ss the air quality benefit of

the candidate control measur es and a modeling report was

developed 27 

## . Based on the results, the LADCO project team felt

it would not be possible to advance the attainment date for

PM 2.5 

## . Ohio EPA, in its attainm ent demonstration submitted on

July 18, 2008, demonstrated (using a weight of evidence

20 http://www.epa.ohio.gov/dapc/regs/3745_17.aspx

21 http://www.epa.ohio.gov/dapc/regs/3745_14.aspx

22 http://www.epa.ohio.gov/dapc/regs/3745_109.aspx

23 http://www.epa.ohio.gov/dapc/regs/3745_110.aspx

24 http://www.ladco.org/reports/control/white_papers

25

http://www.ladco.org/reports/control/final_report s/identification_and_evalua tion_of_candidate_control_m

easures_i_april_2005.pdf;

http://www.ladco.org/reports/control/final_report s/identification_and_evalua tion_of_candidate_control_m

easures_ii_june_2006.pdf

26

http://www.ladco.org/reports/control/final_report s/final_report_evaluation_of _candidate_mobile_source_

control_measures_february_2006.pdf;

http://www.ladco.org/reports/control/final_report s/final_report_evaluation_of _candidate_mobile_source_

control_measures_for_ladco_stat es_in_2009_and_2012_march_2007.pdf

27 http://www.ladco.org/reports/cont rol/modeling/round4_modeling.pdf

### 41 

## approach) that attainment woul d be achieved in this area by

2009. Because of a projected 2009 a ttainment date, it would not

have been reasonably possible or practicable for Ohio to

develop RACT/RACM requirement s, promulgate regulations

and implement a control program prior to the projected

attainment date.

Requirement 2 of 6

Section 172(c)(2) of the 1990 C AA Amendments requires attainment

demonstration SIPs for nonattainment areas to show reasonable further

progress (RFP).

Background

U.S. EPA’s 1997 Impl ementation Rule requi res RFP only for

any area which a State projec ts an attainment date beyond

2014. If a State demonstrates atta inment will occur by 2014 or

earlier, U.S. EPA considers the attainment demonstration to

demonstrate achievement of RFP. However, if a State attains

the standard prior to the require ment to submit an attainment

demonstration, 2012, an attain ment demonstration is not

required.

Demonstration

The Steubenville-Weirt on area has attained the standard prior to

the deadline for submitting an a ttainment demonstration; and

therefore, it was not necessary to submit a separate RFP plan.

Requirement 3 of 6

Section 172(c)(3) requires states to submit a comprehensive inventory of

actual emissions.

Background

Section 172(c)(3) requires states to submit a comprehensive

inventory of actual emission s in the area, including the

requirement for periodic revisions as determined necessary. 40

CFR 51.1008 requires such inv entory to be submitted within

three years of designation and requires a baseline emission

inventory for calendar year 2005 or other suitable year to be

used for attainment planning.

Demonstration

The 2005 comprehensive inventor y was submitted to U.S. EPA

with Ohio’s PM 2.5 

## attainment demonstrat ion SIP submitted on

July 18, 2008. It was then subsequently revised and

resubmitted on June 7, 2010.

### 42 

## Ohio also updates its inventory in accordance with U.S. EPA’s

CERR rule (i.e. emissions statem ents). Ohio EPA submitted its

emissions statement SIP on March 18, 1994 which was

approved by U.S. EPA on October 13, 1995 (59 FR 51863). As

discussed in Chapter 4 (Require ment 4), Ohio EPA submits,

and commits to submit, emission inventories (statements) every

three years.

Requirement 4 of 6

Evidence that control measures required in past PM 2.5 

## SIP revisions have

been fully implemented.

Background

In addition to the historic RACT requirements for PM, the U.S.

EPA NO

x 

## SIP Call required 22 states to pass rules that would

result in significant emission reductions from large EGUs,

industrial boilers, and cement kiln s in the eastern United States.

Ohio passed this rule in 2001. NOx SIP Call r equirements are

incorporated into permits along with monitoring, recordkeeping,

and reporting necessary to ensure ongoing compliance. Ohio

EPA also has an active enf orcement program to address

violations discovered by field offi ce staff. Compliance is tracked

through the Clean Air Market s data monitoring program.

Beginning in 2004, this rule accounts for a reduction of

approximately 31 pe rcent of all NO

x 

## emissions statewide

compared to previous uncontrolled years. The other 21 states

also have adopted these rules.

On March 10, 2004, the U.S. EPA promulgated the CAIR.

Beginning in 2009, U.S. EPA’s CA IR rule requires EGUs in 28

eastern states and the District of Columbia to significantly

reduce emissions of NO

x 

## and SO 2 

## . CAIR replaced the NOx SIP

Call for EGUs. National NO

x 

## emissions will be cut from 4.5

million tons in 2004, to a cap of 1.5 million tons by 2009, and 1.3

million tons in 2018 in 28 states. States were required to submit

a CAIR SIP as part of this effo rt. Ohio submitted a CAIR SIP

which was approved by U.S. EPA on February 1, 2007.

Revisions to the CAIR SIP were again submitted on July 15,

2009. The revised CAIR SIP was approved as a direct final

action on September 25, 2009 (74 FR 48857).

Demonstration

Controls for EGUs under the NO

x 

## SIP Call formally commenced

May 31, 2004. Emissions cover ed by this program have been

generally trending downward si nce 1998 with larger reductions

occurring in 2002 and 2003. Data taken from the U.S. EPA

### 43 

## Clean Air Markets web si te, quantify the gradual NO

x 

## reductions

that have occurred in Ohio as a re sult of Title IV of the 1990

CAA Amendments and the beginning of the NO

x 

## SIP Call Rule.

Ohio developed the NO

x 

## Budget Trading Program rules in OAC

Chapter 3745-14 28 

## in response to the SIP Call. OAC Chapter

3745-14 regulates EGUs and ce rtain non-EGUs under a cap

and trade program based on an 85 percent reduction of NOx

emissions from EGUs and a 60 percent reduction of NO

x 

## emissions from non-EGUs, compared to historical levels. This

cap was in place thro ugh 2008, at which ti me the CAIR program

superseded it as discussed above . Requirement 3 of 5 under

Chapter 4 above discussed the r eductions Ohio has seen as a

result of CAIR.

On April 21, 2004, U.S. EPA published Phase II of the NO

x 

## SIP

Call that establishes a budget fo r large (greater than 1 ton per

day emissions) stationary intern al combustion engines. Ohio

EPA’s OAC rule 37 45-14-12 addresses stationary internal

combustion engines, all used in natural gas pipeline

transmissions. U.S. EPA approved this revision to the SIP on

April 4, 2008. An 82 percent NO

x 

## reduction from 1995 levels is

anticipated. Completion of the compliance plan occurred by May

1, 2006, and the compliance demonstration began May 1, 2007.

Tier II Emission Standards for Vehicles and Gasoline Sulfur

Standards

In February 2000, U.S. EPA fi nalized a federal rule to

significantly reduce emissions from cars and light trucks,

including sport utility vehicles (SUVs). Under this proposal,

automakers will be required to sell cleaner cars, and refineries

will be required to make cleaner, lo wer sulfur gasoline. This rule

will apply nationwide. The f ederal rules will phase in between

2004 and 2009. U.S. EPA has estimated that NO

x 

## emission

reductions will be approximately 77 percent for passenger cars,

86 percent for smaller SUVs, light trucks, and minivans, and 65

to 95 percent reductions for larger SUVs, vans, and heavier

trucks. The sulfur content of gasoline is estimated to be

reduced by up to 90 percent. VO C emission reductions will be

approximately 12 percent for passenger cars, 18 percent for

smaller SUVs, light trucks, and minivans, and 15 percent for

larger SUVs, vans, and heavier trucks.

28 http://www.epa.ohio.gov/dapc/regs/3745_14.aspx

### 44 

## Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines

In July 2000, U.S. EPA issued a final rule for Highway Heavy

Duty Engines, a program which in cludes low-sulfur diesel fuel

standards, which will be phased in from 2004 through 2007.

This rule applies to heavy-dut y gasoline and diesel trucks and

buses. This rule will result in a 40 percent reduction in NO

x 

## from

diesel trucks and buses, a large sector of the mobile sources

NO

x 

## inventory. It also estimated the level of sulfur in highway

diesel fuel will be reduced by 97 percent by mid-2006.

Clean Air Non-road Diesel Rule

In May 2004, U.S. EPA issued the Clean Air Non-road Diesel

Rule. This rule applies to dies el engines used in industries such

as construction, agriculture, and mining. It also contains a

cleaner fuel standard similar to the highway diesel program.

The new standards will cut emi ssions from non-road diesel

engines by more than 90 percent. Non-road diesel equipment,

as described in this rule, current ly accounts for 47 percent of

diesel particulate matter (PM) and 25 percent of NO

x 

## from

mobile sources nationwide. Sulfur levels will be reduced in nonroad diesel fuel by 99 percent from current levels, from

approximately 3,000 parts per m illion (ppm) now to 15 ppm in

2009. New engine st andards take effect, based on engine

horsepower, starting in 2008. Together, these rules will

substantially reduce local and regional sources of PM 2.5



## precursors.

Requirement 5 of 6

Acceptable provisions to provide for new source review.

Background

Ohio has a longstanding and fu lly implemented New Source

Review (NSR) program. This is addressed in OAC Chapter

3745-31 29 

## . The Chapter includes provisions for the Prevention

of Significant Deterioration (PSD) permitting program in OAC

rules 3745-31-01 to 3745-31-20. Ohio's PSD program was

conditionally approved on Octobe r 10, 2001 (66 FR 51570) and

received final approval on J anuary 22, 2003 (68FR 2909) by

U.S. EPA as part of the SIP.

Demonstration

Any facility that is not listed in the 2005 emission inventory, or

for the closing of which credit was taken in demonstrating

attainment, will not be allowed to construct, reopen, modify, or

29 http://www.epa.ohio.gov/dapc/regs/3745_31.aspx

### 45 

## reconstruct without meeting all applicable NSR requirements.

Once the area is redesignated, Ohio EPA will implement NSR

through the PSD program.

Requirement 6 of 6

Assure that all existing control meas ures will remain in effect after

redesignation unless the State demonstrates through modeling that the

standard can be maintained without one or more control measures.

Demonstration

Ohio commits to maintaining the aforementioned control

measures after redesignation. Ohio hereby commits that any

changes to its rules or emission limits applicable to PM 2.5 

## , SO 2 

## , and NO

x 

## as required for maint enance of the 24-hour PM 2.5



## standard in the Steubenvil le-Weirton area, wil l be submitted to

U.S. EPA for approval as a SIP revision.

Ohio, through Ohio EPA’s Legal office, has the legal authority

and necessary resources to actively enforce any violations of its

rules or permit provisions. Afte r redesignation, it intends to

continue enforcing all rules that relate to the emission of PM 2.5 

## precursors in the St eubenville-Weirton area.

### 46 

# CHAPTER SIX

CONTINGENCY MEASURES

CAA Section 107(d)(3)(E)(v)

Requirement 1 of 4

A commitment to submit a revised pl an eight years after redesignation.

Demonstration

Ohio hereby commits to review its maintenance plan eight years

after redesignation, as required by Section 175(A) of the CAA

.

Requirement 2 of 4

A commitment to expeditiously enact and implement additional contingency

control measures in response to ex ceeding specified predetermined levels

(triggers) or in the event that future violations of the am bient standard occur.

Demonstration

Ohio hereby commits to adopt and expeditiously implement

necessary corrective actions in the following circumstances:

Warning Level Response:

A warning level response shal l be prompted whenever the 98 th



## percentile 24-hour PM 2.5 

## concentration of 35.5 μ g/m 3 

## occurs in a

single calendar year within the maintenance area. A warning

level response will consist of a study to determine whether the

PM 2.5 

## value indicates a trend toward higher PM 2.5 

## values or

whether emissions appear to be increasing. The study will

evaluate whether the trend, if any, is likely to continue and, if so,

the control measures necessary to reverse the trend taking into

consideration ease and timing fo r implementation as well as

economic and social consider ations. Implementation of

necessary controls in response to a warning level response

trigger will take place as expe ditiously as possible, but in no

event later than 12 months from the conclusion of the most

recent calendar year.

Should it be determined through the warning level study that

action is necessary to reverse the noted trend, the procedures

for control selection and implem entation outlined under “action

level response” shall be followed.

Action Level Response:

An action level response sha ll be prompted whenever a twoyear average of the 98 th 

## percentile 24-hour PM 2.5 

## concentration

of 35.0 μ g/m 3 

## or greater occurs within the maintenance area. A

### 47 

## violation of the standard (t hree-year average of the 98 th



## percentile 24-hour PM 2.5 

## concentration of 35.0 μ g/m 3 

## or greater)

shall also prompt an action level re sponse. In the event that the

action level is triggered and is not found to be due to an

exceptional event, malfunction, or noncompliance with a permit

condition or rule requirement, Oh io EPA in conjunction with the

metropolitan planning organizati on or regional council of

governments, will determine additi onal control measures

needed to assure future attainm ent of the NAAQS for 24-hour

PM 2.5 

## . In this case, measures that can be implemented in a

short time will be selected in order to be in place within 18

months from the close of the calendar year that prompted the

action level. Ohio EPA will also consider the timing of an action

level trigger and determine if additional, significant new

regulations not currently includ ed as part of the maintenance

provisions will be im plemented in a timely manner and will

constitute our response.

Control Measure Sele ction and Implementation

Adoption of any additional control measures is subject to the

necessary administrative and lega l process. This process will

include publication of notices, an opportunity for public hearing,

and other measures required by Ohio law for rulemaking.

If a new measure/control is already promulgated and scheduled

to be implemented at the federal or State level, and that

measure/control is determined to be sufficient to address the

upward trend in air q uality, additional loca l measures may be

unnecessary. Furthermore, Ohio will submit to U.S. EPA an

analysis to demonstrate the proposed measures are adequate

to return the area to attainment.

Requirement 3 of 4

A list of potential conti ngency measures that would be implemented in such

an event.

Demonstration

Contingency measures to be considered will be selected from a

comprehensive list of meas ures deemed appropriate and

effective at the time the select ion is made. The selection of

measures will be based on cost -effectiveness, emission

reduction potential, economic and so cial considerations or other

factors that Ohio EPA deems appr opriate. Ohio EPA will solicit

input from all interested and affected persons in the

maintenance area prior to sele cting appropriate contingency

measures. Because it is not possi ble at this time to determine

### 48 

## what control measures will be appropriate at an unspecified time

in the future, the list of conti ngency measures outlined below is

not exhaustive.

1) Diesel reduction emission strategies.

2) Alternative fuel (e.g., li quid propane and compressed natural

gas) and diesel retrofit program s for fleet vehicle operations.

3) Tighter PM 2.5 

## , SO 2 

## , and NO

x 

## emissions offsets for new and

modified major sources.

4) Impact crushers located at recycle scrap yards – upgrade wet

suppression.

5) Concrete manufacturing – upgrade wet suppression.

6) Additional NO

x 

## RACT statewide.

No contingency measure s hall be implemented without

providing the opportunity for full public participation during which

the relative costs and benefits of individual measures, at the

time they are under consideration, can be fully evaluated.

Requirement 4 of 4

A list of PM 2.5 

## , SO 2 

## , and NO

x 

## sources potentially subjec t to future additional

control requirements.

Demonstration

The following is a list of PM 2.5 

## , SO 2 

## , and NO

x 

## sources potentially

subject to future controls.

• ICI Boilers - SO 2 

## and NO

x 

## controls;

• EGUs;

• process heaters;

• internal combustion engines;

• combustion turbines;

• other sources greater than 100 tons per year;

• fleet vehicles;

• concrete manufacturers;

• aggregate processing plants;

### 49 

# CHAPTER SEVEN

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION

Ohio published notification for a public hearing and solicitation for public

comment concerning the draft redesignati on petition and maintenance plan in

the widely distributed county publications.

The public hearing to receive comm ents on the redesi gnation request was

held on May 16, 2012, at the Steubenvi lle Library – Schi appa Branch, 4141

Mall Drive, Steubenville, Oh io. The public comment per iod closed on May 16,

2012. Appendix F includes a copy of the public notice, comments received,

and the transcript from the public hearing.

### 50 

# CHAPTER EIGHT

CONCLUSIONS

The Steubenville-W eirton 24-hour PM 2.5 

## nonattainment area has attained the

2006 24-hour NAAQS for PM 2.5 

## and complied with the appl icable provisions of

the 1990 Amendments to the CAA regarding redesignations of PM 2.5



## nonattainment areas. Documentation to t hat effect is contained herein. Ohio

EPA has prepared a redesignation request and maintenance plan that meet

the requirements of Section 110 (a)(1) of the 1990 CAA.

Based on this presentation, t he Steubenville-Weirton 24-hour PM 2.5 

## nonattainment area meets the requirem ents for redesignation under the CAA

and U.S. EPA guidance. Ohio has perfo rmed an analysis that shows the air

quality improvements are due to pe rmanent and enforceabl e measures.

Furthermore, because this area is subject to significant trans port of pollutants,

significant regional SO 2 

## and NO

x 

## reductions will ensure continued compliance

(maintenance) with the st andard with an increasing margin of safety.

The State of Ohio hereby requests that the Steubenvil le-Weirton 24-hour

PM 2.5 

## nonattainment area be redesignated to attainment simultaneously with

U.S. EPA approval of the maintenance plan provisions contained herein.

## This page left intentionally blank

# Appendix A

## This page left intentionally blankUNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

QUICKLOOK CRITERIA PARAMETERS

Oct. 13, 2011 Report Request ID: 919382 Report Code: AMP450

Selection Criteria Page 1 User ID: GYE

State County City

Site Parameter POC AQCR UAR CBSA CSA EPA

Region Method Duration Begin Date End Date

39

54

54 081

009

029 GEOGRAPHIC SELECTIONS

PROTOCOL SELECTIONS

Parameter

Classification Parameter Method Duration

QUICK LOOK 88101

SELECTED OPTIONS

EVENTS PROCESSING

MERGE PDF FILES

WORKFILE DELIMITER Option Type Option Value

EXCLUDE REGIONALLY CONCURRED EVENTS

YES

, SORT ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7 Order Column

PARAMETER_CODE

STATE_CODE

COUNTY_CODE

SITE_ID

POC

DATES

EDT_ID

GLOBAL DATES

2008 Start Date End Date

2010 Tribal

Code

APPLICABLE STANDARDS

Standard Description

PM25 24-hour 2006

PM25 Annual 2006Oct. 13, 2011

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 1 of 6 EXCEPTIONAL DATA TYPES

EDT DESCRIPTION

0

1

2

5 NO EVENTS

EVENTS EXCLUDED

EVENTS INCLUDED

EVENTS WITH CONCURRENCE EXCLUDEDOct. 13, 2011

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 2 of 6 PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) Ohio Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS 4TH

MAX CERT EDT

39-081-0017

39-081-0017

39-081-0017

39-081-1001

39-081-1001

39-081-1001

39-081-1001

39-081-1001

39-081-1001 1

1

1

1

1

1

2

2

2 0809

0809

0809

0809

0809

0809

0809

0809

0809 Steubenville

Steubenville

Steubenville

Mingo

Junction

Mingo

Junction

Mingo

Junction

Mingo

Junction

Mingo

Junction

Mingo

Junction Jefferson

Jefferson

Jefferson

Jefferson

Jefferson

Jefferson

Jefferson

Jefferson

Jefferson 618 LOGAN ST.

618 LOGAN ST.

618 LOGAN ST.

501

COMMERICAL

501

COMMERICAL

501

COMMERICAL

501

COMMERICAL

501

COMMERICAL

501

COMMERICAL 2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010 120

120

120

120

120

120

120

120

120 45.6

38.6

35.3

39.5

23.5

25.9

38.2

23.1

28.2 Y

Y

Y 0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 24-HOUR

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

35.2

24.7

29.8

35.0

23.3

25.1

38.2

22.5

26.3 106

112

108

57

58

55

48

52

52 1ST

MAX 2ND

MAX 3RD

MAX

36.4

25.1

33.3

35.0

23.3

25.1

33.5

22.5

26.3 35.2

24.7

29.8

30.9

22.9

23.3

26.6

22.4

25.2 34.8

24.0

29.1

27.7

22.5

22.5

26.1

21.1

23.6 14.28*

12.11

12.68

14.05

11.22

12.64

13.57*

10.69*

13.01* WTD

ARITH

MEANOct. 13, 2011

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 3 of 6 PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) West Virginia Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS 4TH

MAX CERT EDT

54-009-0005

54-009-0005

54-009-0005

54-009-0011

54-009-0011

54-009-0011

54-009-0011

54-009-0011

54-009-0011

54-029-1004 1

1

1

1

1

1

2

2

2

1 1150

1150

1150

1150

1150

1150

1150

1150

1150

1150 Follansbee

Follansbee

Follansbee

Weirton

Weirton

Weirton

Weirton

Weirton

Weirton

Weirton Brooke

Brooke

Brooke

Brooke

Brooke

Brooke

Brooke

Brooke

Brooke

Hancock FOLLANSBEE -

MAHAN LANE

FOLLANSBEE -

MAHAN LANE

FOLLANSBEE -

MAHAN LANE

WEIRTON -

MARLAND

HEIGHTS

ELEMENTARY

WEIRTON -

MARLAND

HEIGHTS

ELEMENTARY

WEIRTON -

MARLAND

HEIGHTS

ELEMENTARY

WEIRTON -

MARLAND

HEIGHTS

ELEMENTARY

WEIRTON -

MARLAND

HEIGHTS

ELEMENTARY

WEIRTON -

MARLAND

HEIGHTS

ELEMENTARY

WEIRTON - OAK

ST AND OWINGS

ST (BETWEEN 2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008

2009

2010

2008 145

145

145

145

145

145

145

145

145

145 39.8

38.3

32.6

37.4

48.6

38.0

38.4

48.4

37.6

39.4 Y

Y

Y

Y 0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 24-HOUR

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

38.9

23.2

29.8

34.9

26.3

31.6

38.4

48.4

37.6

35.8 117

122

122

121

118

122

29

32

29

119 1ST

MAX 2ND

MAX 3RD

MAX

39.5

24.4

32.0

35.9

29.3

36.3

37.5

25.7

30.0

37.3 38.9

23.2

29.8

34.9

26.3

31.6

34.7

25.0

29.2

35.8 35.6

23.1

29.7

34.5

24.7

30.8

31.4

19.2

21.5

30.9 14.68

12.15

14.14

13.79

11.88

13.48

15.48

11.86

14.37

13.33 WTD

ARITH

MEANOct. 13, 2011

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 4 of 6 PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101) West Virginia Micrograms/cubic meter (LC) (105)

SITE ID P

O

C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH #OBS 4TH

MAX CERT EDT

54-029-1004

54-029-1004 1

1 1150

1150 Weirton

Weirton Hancock

Hancock DEAD ENDS)

WEIRTON - OAK

ST AND OWINGS

ST (BETWEEN

DEAD ENDS)

WEIRTON - OAK

ST AND OWINGS

ST (BETWEEN

DEAD ENDS) 2009

2010 145

145 29.6

34.4 0

0 24-HOUR

98TH

PERCENTILE

VALUE

25.2

31.2 122

122 1ST

MAX 2ND

MAX 3RD

MAX

28.7

33.1 25.2

31.2 22.9

30.7 11.25

12.58 WTD

ARITH

MEANOct. 13, 2011

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 5 of 6 88101

88101 120

145 Andersen RAAS2.5-300 PM2.5 SEQ w/WINS

R & P Model 2025 PM-2.5 Sequential Air Sampler GRAVIMETRIC

Gravimetric PARAMETER METHOD

CODE COLLECTION METHOD ANALYSIS METHOD METHODS USED IN THIS REPORTOct. 13, 2011

Note: The * indicates that the mean does

not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 6 of 6 PQAOS USED IN THIS REPORT

PQAO AGENCY DESCRIPTION

0809

1150 Ohio EPA, Southeast District Office

West Virginia Air Pollution Control Commission

# Appendix B

## This page left intentionally blank

## 1 

# OHIO

2005 Base Year PM2.5 SIP Inventory

Ohio Environmental Protection Agency

Lazarus Government Center

50 West Town Street, Suite 700

Columbus Ohio 43215

Prepared by Ohio EPA

Division of Air Pollution Control

Emissions Inventory Unit

February 2008

## 2 

# Table of Contents

Section Page

Introduc tion ................................................................................................. 3

1.0 Point Sources ............................................................................................. 4

2.0 Area S ources .............................................................................................. 8

3.0 Non Road Sources........................................................................15

4.0 On Road Sources.......

.................. .................. ................ ................ .............17

5.0 MAR Sources..............................................................................43

Table

2-1 Categories included in the 2005 area source Inventory.............................8

2-2 Emission Factors used for Wood Bu rners included in area sources............11

3-1 NMIM NCD Tables for Specific Years and States ........................................... 

## 16

4-1 Federal Functional Class Categories............................................................ 

## 23

4-2 DVMT Summary by County



## .................................................................. . 24

4-3 Speed by Federal Functional Class ............................................................. 

## 28

4-4 Link Group Codes & Associated BPR Curves

.......................................... 

## 29

4-5 Mobile6 Inputs.................................................................................31

4-6 LADCO Data Output............................................. .............39

4-7 County Summary Table of MPOs by County......................................... .40

5-1 Number of operations and LTOs for 2005.............................................. 45

5-2 EDMS Aircraft Emissions ..................................................................50

5-3 Fleet Emission Fa ctor Categories ........................................................51

5-4 Pollutant by County (Sample) ............................................................. 54

. Figure

1............................... ......... Speed Comparison Graphs.....................................27

## 3 

# 2005 Base Year PM2.5 SIP Inventory for Ohio

Introduction

The State of Ohio has a nu mber of counties with air quality data showing nonattainment for the following PM 2



## . 5 

## standard:

• 

## Annual Standard = 15.0 ug/m3

The Clean Air Act Amendments (CAA A) requires all states to revise and submit State

Implementation Plans (SIP) for areas which are classified as non-atta inment of the 1997

Fine Particle (PM 2



## . 5 

## ) National Ambient Air Quality St andards (NAAQS). The Federal

Register ( Vol. 72, No. 79/ Wednesday, April 25, 2007) provides the emissions inventory

rules and regulations for the PM 2



## . 5 

## Clean Air Fine Particle implementation rule. An

electronic version of the document can be found at http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPAAIR/2007/April/Day-25/a6347.pdf.



## As part of the designation of non-attainment areas for PM 2



## . 5 

## standards, a new

attainment demonstration SIP will be necessary. A key el ement in the overall SIP

planning process is the need for an updated emissions inventory. This document

presents the 2005 Base Year Pa rticulate SIP Emissions Inv entory for Ohio as required

by the CAAA. It includes emissions for poi nt, area, on-road mobi le and non-road mobile

for the State of Ohio.

This technical report document s the procedures and the me thodologies that were used

in the development of daily emissions for all counties in Ohio. This report describes the

following:

1. Identification of st ationary and mobile sources included in the

inventory;

2. Sources of data, and data collecti on methods used in the development

of the inventory;

3. Methods and procedures used to estimate emissions; and

4. Assumptions considered in t he development of the emissions

inventories.

The intent of this report is to descri be how the inventory was prepared, and what

information was considered in the inventory development.

This document is comprised of 5 sections , one section for each inventory type. The

biogenic inventory is not being discussed in this document because Ohio EPA did not

participate in the generation of this inventory. Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium

(LADCO) ran EPA’s BEIS model in the Em ission Modeling System (EMS) to generate

Summer Weekday emissions for VOC and NOx.

## 4 

# SECTION 1

POINT SOURCES

Emissions and source specific data for point sources are collected for the 2005 baseyear SIP inventory by the Ohio Envir onmental Protection Agency (Ohio EPA.) The

primary source of data for point sources is facility reported STARShip files. STARShip

is a software package developed by Ohio EPA, Division of Ai r Pollution Control (DAPC),

to assist the regulated community in prepar ing and submitting a variety of electronic

permit applications and reports to the DAPC . These data are reported by the Title V

facilities annually as part of the emission s fee/inventory process conducted by Ohio

EPA and include emissions, process rates, oper ating schedules, emissions control data

and other relevant information.

The STARShip files are electr onically transferred to the DAPC and stored into the

Division’s Oracle database, STARS. The f iles are reviewed by the local air agencies

and Ohio EPA district and central office staff. After review, the data are imported into

Excel and linked with an Access® database to further process the information into the

federally approved National Em ission Inventory (NEI) database format in version 3.0.

The files are quality assured ag ain using the United States Environmental Protection

Agency’s (U.S.EPA) QA/QC so ftware for format and content. The data is finally

submitted to LADCO for emissions processi ng through the Emissions Modeling System.

The State provided inv entory for Electric Generating Un its (EGU) is replaced with the

Federal EGU inventory. T he EGU inventory is compiled by U.S. EPA’s Acid Rain

Program. It is based on facility report ed emissions as meas ured by continuous

emissions monitors. In conclusion, the final point source inventory is a hybrid of the

federal EGU inventory and the state provided non-EGU units.

A major distinction typically made in emissi ons inventories is t hat between point and

area sources. In this invent ory, point sources are sources for which individual records

are maintained for that source. Such records are maintained for all Ohio Title V facilities

(706 facilities statewide). The area source inventory accounts for facilities from nonTitle V facilities and calculates emissions information using surrogate emissions factors

based on energy usage, population, employment records, or other reliable data. A

more detailed discussion of t he area source inventory is pr ovided in Section 2. The

point source inventory descr ibed herein is considered to be the most current and

accurate source of emissions data available for 2005.

1.1 Point Source Process Emissions

Ohio EPA defines point source process emissions as those which occur at an

identifiable Title V stationary stack or vent. Point source emissions not emitted from

discrete stacks or vents are termed fugitive emissions and are discussed in Section 1.2.

## 5 1.1.1 Source Identificati on and Data Collection

The sources to be included in the 2005 base year inventory are identified using the Title

V STARS database. Facility production and emissions data are included in this

database. This information is fac ility-reported actual 2005 emissions.

1.1.2 Non-reactive VOC Emissions Adjustments

This section is primarily appl icable for VOC pollutants. S ources are required to identify

emissions of photochemically non-reactive Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC.) Based

upon this information, those emissions have been specifically excl uded from the 2005

base line inventory in accordance with U.S. EPA’s “Recommended Policy on the

Control of Volatile Organic Co mpounds.” A complete list of the compounds that U.S.

EPA has identified as being photochemically non -reactive, and therefore not included in

the inventory, are listed below:

• Methane

• Ethane

• Methylene chloride

• Methyl chloroform

• Trichlorofluoromethane (CFC-11)

• Dichlorodifluoromethane (CFC-12)

• Chlorodifluoromethane (CFC-22)

• Trifluoromethane (HFC-23)

• Chlorofluoromethance (HCFC-31)

• Difluoromethane (HFC-32)

• Decafluoropentane (HFC-43-10mee)

• Ethylfluoride (HFC-161)

• Trichlorotrifluoroethane (CFC-113)

• Dichlorotetrafluoroethane (CFC-114)

• Chloropentafluoroethane (CFC-115)

• 2,2-Dichloro-1,1,1-trifluoroethane (HCFC-123)

• 1,1,2-Trifluoroethane (HCFC-123a)

• 2-Chloro-1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane (HCFC-124)

• Pentafluoroethane (HFC-125)

• 1,1,2,2,-Tetrafluoroethane (HFC-134)

• 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane (HFC-134a)

• 1,1-Dichloro-1-fluoroethane (HCFC-141b)

• 1-Chloro-1,1,-difluoroethane (HCFC-142b)

• 1,1,1-Trifluoroethane (HFC-143a)

• Fluoroethane (HCFC-151a)

• 1,1-Difluoroethane (HFC-152a)

• Pentafluoropropane (HFC-225ca)

• Pentafluoropropane (HFC-225cb)

• Hexafluoropropane (HFC-236ea)

• Hexafluoropropane (HFC-236fa)

• Pentafluoropropane (HFC-245ca)

• Pentafluoropropane (HFC-245ea)

• Pentafluoropropane (HFC-245eb)

## 6 • Pentafluoropropane (HFC-245fa)

• Pentafluorobutane (HFC-365mfc)

• Parachlorobenzotrifluoride (PCBTF)

• Methoxybutane

• Nonaflourobutane

• Heptafluoropropane ((CF 3 

### ) 2 

### CFCF 2 

### OCH 3 

### )

• Heptafluoropropane ((CF 3 

### )CFCF 2 

### OC 2 

### H 5 

### )

• Perchloroethylene

• Cyclic, branched or linear completely methylated siloxanes

• Methyl acetate

• Volatile methyl siloxanes

• Acetone



## 1.1.3 Emissions Esti mation Methodologies

Since source reported actual annual emi ssions are used in the 2005 base year

inventory, no estimation methods are necessary . The reports are provided to LADCO in

National Emissions Inventory Input Format (NIF) 3.0 format. LADCO imported and

processed the NIF files in EMS and applied temporal and spat ial profiles to the annual

emissions to calculate weekday emissions rate s. The final point source inventory is

split into two separate reports, the Electric Generating Units (EGU) which is the U.S.

EPA inventory for electric generating units a nd the non-EGU which is the state inventory

minus the EGU units.

1.2 Point Source Fugitive Emissions

Another type of emissions data which is r equired to be filed from point sources is

fugitive emissions. Before 1990, fugitive emissions were categorized as area sources

due to the lack of detailed information availa ble for fugitive sources. However, since

these emissions are now el ectronically reported in t he State’s ORACLE database,

STARS, these emissions can be classified as point sources.

1.3 References

Getting Started: Emissions In ventory Methods for PM2.5 U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, September, 1999.

Emissions Inventory Guidance for Implem entation of Ozone and Particulate Matter

National Ambient Air Qaulity Standards (N AAQS) and Regional Haze Regulations

, Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards Research, Triangle Park, NC. November

2005.

Compilation of Air Pollution Emission Factors, Fourth Ed ition and Supplements, AP-42

. U.S. Environmental Protecti on Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, September 1985.

## 7 Preparing 2002 Regional PM2.5 Emissions QAQPS PM Inventory Conference Inventory

Conference San Diego, 2003.

Documentation for the 2002 El ectric Generating Unit Nati onal Emissions Inventory

(NEI) . Eastern research group, Inc., 1600 Peri meter Park Drive, Morrisville, NC 27560

and E.H. Pechan and Associates, Inc., 5528–B Hempstead Way

## 8 

# SECTION 2

AREA SOURCES

Area sources are sources which are typically small, indivi dual, numerous, and have not

been inventoried as specific point, mobile, or biogenic sources. For inventory purposes,

they are grouped with other like sources into categories that allow emissions to be

calculated collectively usi ng one methodology. Since area sources are traditionally

defined at the county level, most methods are designed to estimate area source

emissions at the county level.

Ohio EPA has either used published Emission Inventory Improvement Program (EIIP) 6



## methodologies or selected other methodologies which are shared by other states. The

decision of which methodology to use was lar gely based on Ohio’s data availability.

Data which was not available on a county-lev el is estimated by assigning a percentage

of the state’s total activity to each county based on the state’s popul ation or employment

information. If Ohio county specific activity data is available throu gh Ohio EPA or other

State Agencies, that data is us ed rather than allocating acti vity by percentage. Table 2-1

lists the sources which emit PM 2.5 

## , NO

x 

## and SO 2 

## along with the respective EFs used to

calculate each pollutant.

Table 2-1 Categories in the 2005 PM 2



## . 5 

## SIP Area Source inventory

Area Source NO

x 

## PM 2.5 

## SO 2 

## Section

Commercial Natural

Gas Combustion 94 lb/MMSCF 7.6 lb/MMSCF 0.6 lb/MMSCF 2.1

Industrial Distillate Oil

Combustion 20 lb/E3gal fuel 0.25 lb/E3gal fuel 42.6 lb/E3gal fuel 2.2

Industrial Residual Oil

Combustion 55 lb/E3gal fuel 4.67 lb/E3gal fuel 157 lb/E3gal fuel 2.2

Industrial Natural Gas

Combustion 94 lb/MMSCF 7.6 lb/MMSCF 0.6 lb/MMSCF 2.2

Residential Coal

Combustion 9.1 Lb/Ton Coal 3.8 Lb/Ton Coal 31 Lb/Ton Coal 2.3

Residential Distillate

Oil Combustion 18 lb/E3gal fuel 0.83 lb/E3gal fuel 42.6 lb/E3gal fuel 2.3

Residential Natural

Gas Combustion 94 lb/MMSCF 7.6 lb/MMSCF 0.6 lb/MMSCF 2.3

Residential LPG

Combustion 13 lb/E3gal fuel 0.17 lb/E3gal fuel 0.1 lb/E3gal fuel 2.3

Human Cremation 1.01E+01 lb/Ton

cremated 0.0637 lb/Ton

cremated NA 2.4

Structure Fires 1.4 Lb/Ton

burned 10.8 Lb/Ton

burned NA 2.5

Outdoor Wood Boilers 2.8 Lb/Ton 2.76E+1 Lb/Ton 4 E-1 Lb/Ton 2.6

## 9 Residential Wood

Combustion

Non-Certified

Non-Catalytic

Catalytic 2.80E+00 lb/Ton

2.80E+00 lb/Ton

2.00E+00 lb/Ton 3.06E+01 lb/Ton

1.96E+01 lb/Ton

2.04E+01 lb/Ton 4.00E-01 lb/Ton

4.00E-01 lb/Ton

4.00E-01 lb/Ton 2.3

2.1 

## Commercial Natural Gas Combustion (SCC 2103006000)

The 2005 total state-level commercial sector energy consumption is obtained from the

Energy Information Administration (EIA)’s State Energy Data System (SEDS), and

apportioned per county based on population 4 

## . Emissions factors are given in table 2-1.

The area source emissions are calculated ba sed on an adjusted value by subtracting

the emissions due to point sources.

2.2 Industrial Fuel Combustion

Industrial Distillate Oil Combustion (SCC 2102004000)

Ohio’s fuel consumption is apportioned per county based on the county’s population 4



## . The area source NO X 

## emissions are calculated and adjusted by subtracting the

emissions due to point source s. A heating value of 140 MMBTU/1000 Gal is used and

84,408 thousand gallons are consumed in 2005. [MMBTU stand for Million British

Thermal Units]. Emissions fact ors are given in table 2-1.

SO 2 

## emissions were calculated us ing EF 42.6 Lb/1000 Gal. PM 10 

## and PM 2.5 

## emissions

are calculated using 1Lb/1000 Ga l and 0.25 Lb/1000 Gal respecti vely. All Factors are

obtained from AP-42 19



## Industrial Residual Oil Combustion (SCC 2102005000)

Ohio’s fuel consumption is apportioned per county based on the county’s population 4



## . The area source NO X 

## emissions are calculated and adjusted by subtracting the

emissions due to point sour ces. 54,652 thousand gallons 14 

## are consumed in 2005 and

a heating value of 140 MMBTU/1000 Gal is used. The SO 2 

## emissions are calculated

using EF 157 Lb/1000 Gal. PM 10 

## and PM 2.5 

## emissions are calculated using 7.17 Lb/1000

Gal and 4.67 Lb/1000 Gal respectively. All factors are obtained from AP-42 19



## Industrial Natural Gas Combustion (S CC 2102006000)

Ohio’s fuel consumption is apportioned per county based on the county’s population 4



## . The area source NO X 

## emissions are calculated and adjusted by subtracting the

emissions due to point sources. 293,857 MMCF 14 

## are consumed in 2005. The SO 2

## 10 emissions are calculated usi ng EF 0.6 Lb/MMBTU. The PM 10 

## and PM 2.5 

## emissions are calculated using 7.6 Lb/MMBTU. All factors were obtained from AP-42 19



## 2.3 Residential Fuel Combustion

Residential Coal Combustion (SCC 2104001000)

Ohio’s household consumption of coal is apportioned per county based on county

population 4 

## . NO X 

## emissions are calculated using EF of 9.1 of coal. The SO 2 

## emissions

are calculated using EF 31Lb/1000 Gal. The PM 10 

## and PM 2.5 

## emissions are calculated

using 6.2Lb/Ton and 3.8 Lb/Ton respectively . All factors were obtained from AP-42 19



## Residential Distillate Oil Combustion (SCC 2104004000)

Ohio’s household consumption of distillate oil is apportioned per county based on

county population 4 

## . NO X 

## emissions are calculated us ing EF of 18 lb/1000 gallons

distillate fuel respectively. A heating value of 140 MMBTU/1000 Gal is used. The SO 2 

## emissions are calculated using EF 42.6 Lb/1000 Gal. The PM 10 

## and PM 2.5 

## emissions

are calculated using 1.08Lb/1000 Gal and 0.83 Lb/1000 Gal respec tively. All factors are

obtained from AP-42 19



## Residential Liquid Petroleu m Gas Combustion (LPG)

(SCC 2104007000)

Ohio’s household consumption of LPG is apportioned per county based on county

population 4 

## . NO X 

## emissions are calculated using EF of 13 lb/1000 gallons LPG. The

SO 2 

## emissions are calculated usi ng EF 0.1 Lb/1000 Gal. The PM 10 

## and PM 2.5 

## emissions

are calculated using 0.17Lb/1000 Gal. All factors are obtained from AP-42 19



## Residential Natural Gas Combustion (SCC 2104006010)

Ohio’s household consumption of LPG is apportioned per county based on county

population 4 

## . NO X 

## emissions are calculated using EF of 94 lb/MMSCF. MMSCF stands

for Million Standard Cubic Feet. This source also emits SO 2 

## emissions which are

calculated using EF 0.6 Lb/MMBTU. The PM 10 

## and PM 2.5 

## emissions are calculated

using 7.6Lb/MMBTU. All fact ors are obtained from AP-42 19



## Residential Wood Combustion

NO X 

## emissions from this area source are ca lculated for seven types of residential

heating units that utilize wood for fuel. They are listed below with the appropriate SCC:

Fireplaces without inserts 2104008001

Fireplaces with inserts cataly tic (non-U.S. EPA cert) 2104008002

Fireplaces with inserts non -catalytic 2104008003

Fireplaces with inserts catalytic (U.S. EPA cert) 2104008004

Wood stoves – Conventional 2104008010

Woodstoves – Catalytic 2104008030

Wood stoves – Non catalytic 2104008050

## 11 The number of Ohio homes with fireplaces ar e adjusted for those t hat burn wood. The

following assumptions are applie d to those adjusted homes:

92 percent of wood combust ed in non-certified units

5.7 percent of wood combusted in non-catalytic units

2.3 percent of wood combusted in catalytic units

A state consumption value is applied which is apportioned to each county based on its

population 4 

## . Table 2-2 shows the EF used for each of the seven types of indoor wood

burners which make-up this category:

Table 2-2 Emission Factors Used for Wood Burners

SCC 2104008002 210400 8003 2104008004

SCC 2104008010 210400 8050 2104008030

SCC 2104008001

RAPIDS Code Non-Certified N on-Catalytic Catalytic Units

SO 2 

## 4.00E-01 4.00E-01 4.00E-01 Lb/ton

NO X 

## 2.80E+00 2.80E+00 2.00E+00 Lb/ton

PM 2.5 

## 3.06E+01 1.96E+01 2.04E+01 Lb/ton

To avoid double counting of wood consumption for fuel, this category is adjusted by

subtracting the wood consumption from OWB to allow this category to account only for

indoor wood burning emissions.

Residential Wood combustion also emits SO 2 

## which is calculated using EF 0.4 Lb/Ton

EF. The PM 2.5 

## emissions are calculated using EF as shown in table 2-2. All factors are

obtained from AP-42 19



## 2.4 Human Cremation (SCC 2810060200)

Not all Ohio counties possess a crematory so only those counties with crematories are

used to calculate the number of cremations and their resulting NOx emissions. The

2005 cremation data is obtained fr om the Ohio Department of Health, Vital Statistics 17



## . It is estimated that 3% of deaths occur outsi de the State of Ohio with no available data

to account for their disposition at the time this area source is being calculated.

Therefore, those deaths are not accounted for in this category.

The methodology does not offer an EF for NOx for this category nor is NOx required to

be calculated for this area source. Ohio f eels that it is a combustion source and NOx

needs to be included in the inventory al ong with the other com bustion sources.

Through its Permits-to-Install for human crem ation, Ohio has se lected a NOx EF of

10.13lb/ton cremated to calculate emi ssions from this area source.

## 12 This source also emits PM, PM 10 

## , and PM 2.5 

## emissions which are calculated using EF

0.1 Lb/Ton, 0.071Lb/Ton and, 0.0637 Lb/Ton respec tively. All factors are obtained from

AP-42 19



## 2.5 Structur e Fires (SCC 2810030000)

The Structure Fires category includes resid ential and commercial fires resulting from

unintentional actions. Intentional fires, fo rest and wildfires, agricultural, and vehicle

burning are not included in this area source

. The State Fire Marshall Office, Fire

Prevention Bureau 15 

## provided data on the number of st ructure fires per county in 2005.

This area source is consider ed a combustion source for NO X 

## emissions which are

calculated using EF 1.4 lb/ton burned. The residential and commercial structures fires

for each county are tabul ated and a fuel load ing of 1.15 Ton/fire is applied. This source

also emits PM, PM 10 

## , and PM 2.5 

## emissions which are calculat ed using EF 10.8 Lb/Ton.

This factor was obtained from AP-42 19



## 2.6 Outdoor W ood Boilers (SCC 2104008070)

Outdoor Wood Boilers (OWB), are also known as outdoor water stoves and outdoor

wood furnaces, are used as outdoor residenti al heaters. These boilers have wood

burning fireboxes surrounded by a water reserv oir vented by a chimney stack. The

combustion of the wood in t he firebox heats the water in the surrounding reservoir and

the heated water is pumped to the residence. OWB units can also supply residential

hot water. The water capacit y ranges from 60 gallons to 764 gallons. The operational

design creates long periods where the fire smolders and creosote is formed 13



## .

When the water circulating through the furn ace reaches an upper set point, the air

supply to the fire is cut-off, cooling the fire so the water will not overheat. The furnace

operates in this "idle" mode until the water te mperature hits a lower set point and the air

supply is re-established. The OWB may be in idle mode far longer than in operating

mode. This type of operating causes very poor combustion and heavy foul smoke. Most

of the smoke emitted is fi ne condensed organic material t hat does not burn under cool,

oxygen starved conditions. In addition, many owners burn green wood full of moisture

which also causes poor combustion 12



## . The smoke created from these outdoor wood

burning units can contain severa l pollutants that are harmful to breathe, including fine

particle pollution such as PM 2.5 11 

## in addition to NOx (research assisted by Deborah

Lucas, DAPC intern, 2007)

This new area source category has many unknowns and variables associated with it

and Ohio does not possess accurate OWB uni t sales data available to calculate

emissions on the county level. Therefore, several assu mptions are made in agreement

with the Great Lake States in order to formulate a homogeneous inventory for the

region.

## 13 The assumptions are as follows:

• 100% of wood combusted in non-certified units.

• OWB units to be 90% in rural counties and 10% in urban counties

• 11.68 cords of wood consumption per unit per year (includes heating efficiency of

30-40%)

• 5 months heating season = 3650 hours (24/7)

• PM 2.5 

## emissions factor (g/kg wood) =13.82 (Average of indoor and outdoor) or

27.64 lb/ton of wood

The agreed upon methodology requi res that total number of OWB sold in Ohio be

apportioned to each county based on rural or urban designation while observing the 9:1

ratio in area sales. The guesstimated factor s (see above) are applied to calculate the

emissions from this outdoor wood burner. Total emissions obtained from this category

are subtracted from the Residential Wood Co mbustion category to allow for accurate

emissions from the indoor wood burning units.

2.7 References

1. Documentation For the 2002 Non-Point S ource National Emission Inventory For

CAPS and HAPS . U.S. Environmental Protecti on Agency. Emissions Factor and

inventory Group. E.H Pe chan and Associates, Inc. January 2004.

2. United States Census Bureau. Population Division.

http://eire.census.gov/popest/data/c ounties/tables/CO-EST 2002/CO-EST2002-01-

39.php (Accessed 2003)

3. United States Census Bureau. County Business Patterns.

http://censtats.census.gov/cbpnaic/cbpnaic.shtml

(Accessed 2003)

4. Ohio Department of Development, Office of Strategic Research. Population Projects

by Age and Sex: 2005-2030. http://www.odod.ohio.gov /research/files/p200.htm

(Accessed August 2006)

5. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1999 Base Year Non-point Source National

Emission Inventory for Hazardous Air Pollutants, Research Triangle Park, NC.

September 28, 2001.

6 . Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA). STAPPA-ALAP CO-EPA Emission

Inventory Improvement Progr am (EIIP). Volume III - Area Sources Preferred and

Alternative Methods. November 1996.

7. Documentation for the Dr aft 1999 National Emissions In ventory (Version 3.0) for

Criteria Air Pollutants and Amm onia. Area Sources. E. H. Pechan & Associates, Inc.

March 3, 2003

## 14 8. U.S. Environmental Pr otection Agency, STAPPA-ALAPC O-EPA Emission Inventory

Improvement Program (EIIP), Volume III - Area Sources Preferred and Alternative

Methods, Chapter 8. September 1997.

9. Spreadsheet formulation provided by “Buzz” David Asse lmeier, Air Quality Planning

Section, Inventory Group, Springfield, Illinois.

10. Environmental Protection Agen cy (EPA). STAPPA-ALAPCO-EPA Emission

Inventory Improvement Progr am (EIIP). Volume III - Area Sources Preferred and

Alternative Methods. May 1997.

11. (Environmental Chemistr y.com) viewed on Feb 8th, 2007.

[http://environmentalchemistry.com/yogi /environmental/200602out doorwoodfurnaces.ht

ml ]

12. (Washington State, Department of Ecology) viewed on Feb 8th, 2007

[http://www.ecy.wa.gov/progr ams/air/AOP_Permits/Boiler /Outdoor_Boilers_home.html]

13. U.S. Environmental Protection Agen cy. Reducing Pollution from Outdoor WoodFired Hydronic Heaters. Fact Sheet

http://www.epa.gov/owhh/ pdfs/fact_sheet_1_29_07.pdf (Accessed 1/2007)

14. Industrial Sector E nergy Price and Expenditure Estimates, 1970-2001, Ohio.

Energy Information Administration. U. S. Department of Energy.

http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/st ates/sep_prices/ind/pr_ind_oh.html

http://www.eia.doe.gov/em eu/aer/pdf/pages/sec1_27.pdf (Accessed 2003)

15. State Fire Marshal Office. Fire Prevention Bureau, Columbus, Ohio.

http://www.com.state.oh. us/odoc/sfm/firecont.htm (Accessed 2003)

16. Documentation for the Draft 1999 National Emissions In ventory (Version 3.0) For

Criteria Air Pollutants and Amm onia. Area Sources. E. H. Pechan & Associates, Inc.

March 3, 2003

17. Ohio Department of Health, Vital Statistics

18. Environmental Protection Agency. STAPPA-ALAPCO-EPA Em ission Inventory

Improvement Program (EIIP). Volume X – Emissions Projections. December 1999.

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/eiip/techreport/volume10/x01.pdf

(Accessed 2/2007)

19. Environmental Protection Agency. AP-42. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/

## 15 

# SECTION 3

NON-ROAD SOURCES

The non-road inventory is gener ated regionally by running U. S. EPA’s Nati onal Mobile

Inventory Model (NMIM) model. The Wi sconsin Department of Natural Resources

undertook the responsibility of customizing the NMIM input files and submitting the

output file in NIF format to LADCO and U.S. EPA. LADCO process ed the NMIM files in

their emissions model and generat ed daily emissions rates. Grant Heatherington from

the Wisconsin Department of Natural Reso urces provided the following descriptions...

The National Mobile Inventory Model (NMIM) developed by USEPA was used to

estimate emissions for all other non-road m obile categories. NMIM consolidates nonroad mobile emissions and on-road emissions modeling into a singl e modeling system.

Only the non-road emissions modeling portion of NMIM was used in the development of

this emission’s inventory. NMIM uses the USEPA’s NONROAD model to calculate nonroad mobile emissions. The basic NONROAD algorithm for calculating emissions uses

base year equipment populati ons, average load factors, available engine powers,

activity hours and emission factors. Before NMIM was run, modifications and additions

were made to the NM IM input data.

a. Added emission factors for diesel ta mpers/rammers provided by E.H.

Pechan & Associates, Inc. Diesel tampers/rammers are a type of

construction equipment.

b. Revised PM 2.5 

## ratios in SCC table to correctly calculate PM 2



## . 5 

## diesel

emissions. This error was introduc ed with NMIM2005 and didn’t exist in

NMIM2004.

c. Revised gasoline parameter s using updates provi ded by the states and

E.H. Pechan & Associates, Inc. Ga soline parameters include Reid Vapor

Pressure (RVP), oxygenate c ontent and sulfur content.

The NMIM NEI NIF files are on the LADCO ftp site at:

ftp://ftp.airtoxics.org/in v2005/nonroad/NMIM /Base_L_ph2/2005/



# Revised NMIM2005 Input Data

Emission Factor Data

All States: Pechan revised the brake specific fuel consumption (BSFC) emission factor data to

include diesel tampers/rammers (2270002006). The revised NMIM file is saved as

revBSFC.EMF.

## 16 Population Data

For 26000.pop, replaced default file supplied with NMIM2005 with 26000_rev_NMIM05.pop that

contains revised construction data missing from 26000.pop external file provided with

NMIM2005. This Michigan construction data should have been added with the other LADCO

states modified construction data but was overlooked.



## SCC Data

The default SCC table of NCD20060201 is replaced by a version that contains corrections to the

PM25fac field that earlier NCDs contained (i.e. changed from 0.92 to 0.97 for diesel non-road

equipment) in NONROAD2004.



## Fuel Data

LADCO States: Pechan revised four tables (countyyear, countyyearmonth, datasource and

gasoline) in the National County Database (NCD) used by NMIM to incorporate new fuel data.

AIR revised gasoline characteristics per instructions from the states. Also, gasoline

characteristic revisions for 2005 provided by states were incorporated. Additional revisions

were incorporated into 2002 data for non-road Stage 2 controls. Depending on the year being

modeled, different versions of the revised tables are used. Also, the countynrfile, countyyear

and datasource tables were revised to reference the new activity, allocation, growth, population

and seasonality files described above. NCD tables with names ending in “def” are default

versions of the table. See table below for the appropriate versions of the tables for the selected

years.

Non-LADCO States: The countynrfile, countyyear and datasource tables were revised to

reference the new activity, allocation and seasonality files described above. See table below for

the appropriate versions of the tables for the selected years.



## Table 3-1 NMIM National County Database Tables for Specific Years and States

States

Years

1999 (WI only) 2002, 05, 07, 08, 09, 12 and 18

LADCO states countynrfile_NMIM05_rev,

countyyear_NMIM05_rev,

countyyearmonth_NMIM05_w

_05_12_18_rev,

datasource_NMIM05_rev,

gasoline_NMIM05_def

SCC_NCD20060201_rev

(used when NCD20060201 is

used) countynrfile_NMIM05_rev,

countyyear_NMIM05_rev ,

countyyearmonth_NMIM05_w_05_12_18_rev,

datasource_NMIM05_rev,

gasoline_NMIM05_w_05_12_18_rev

SCC_NCD20060201_rev (used when

NCD20060201 is used)

## 17 

# SECTION 4

ON-ROAD SOURCES

A mobile source of air pollution is a self-p ropelled or portable emi tter of air pollutants,

and mobile source emissions are those genera ted by the engines or motors that power

such sources. Most mobile sources, exce pt jet or turboprop ai rcraft, are powered by

internal combustion (IC) piston engines, and nearly all use liquid fuels.

Gaseous fuels, such as compressed natur al gas (CNG) or li quefied petroleum gas

(LPG), had only a very small fraction of the motor fuel market in Ohio in 2005. Solid

fuels have not been used by mobile sources in significant amounts since railroads

retired their coal-powered steam locomotives in the 1950s.

4.1 Categories of Mobile Sources

For inventory and planning pur poses, mobile sources ar e divided into two major

categories.

1. On-highway mobile sources (usually referred to as on-road ), e.g., motor

vehicles such as cars, vans, trucks, buses and motorcycles used for

transportation of goods and pa ssengers on roads and streets

2. Off-highway (usually referred to as non-road ) mobile sources including:

• Modes of powered transportation that do not use roads, such as aircraft,

trains, ships and boats, and motor vehicles used off-road.

• Self-propelled or portable motoriz ed machines or equipment not used for

transportation, ranging from constructi on equipment and farm tractors to

lawnmowers and hand-held power weed choppers.

Mobile Sources: All on-road mobile source s are self-propelled.

Non-road Mobile Sources: Some non-road mobile source s (e.g., farm tractors), are

self-propelled, but many non-road sources ar e not. A gasoline-powe red chain saw is a

familiar example of a non-self-pr opelled non-road mobile source.

Stationary Sources: Not all movable or portable emi ssion sources are mobile sources,

however. A small truck-portable cement or hot-mix asphalt plant, for example, may be

set up near a construction or road-building site . Such plants are classified as stationary

sources, not mobile sources for two reasons: (1) they may operate for weeks or months

at a single location, and (2) the trucks that move the plants do not supply power for

them.

## 18 NOTE: Not all Internal Combustion engines (IC) or turbine engines are mobile sources.

Fixed IC engines, such as those that pow er pipeline compressors or standby generators

in electricity plants and elsewhere, are al so classified as stationary sources.

4.1.1 Categories and Componen ts of Mobile Source Emissions

There are three categories of mobile source emissions:

• Exhaust or tailpipe emissions , which result from the combustion of fuel in the

source’s engine

• Evaporative emissions , which result from evaporation of fuel from the engine or

its fuel system

• Refueling emissions

Exhaust Emissions: Are the result of fuel combustion and occu r only when the engine

is running.

Evaporative emissions: Are Volatile Organic Compou nd (VOC) based only and are

continuously emitted from an engine’s fuel syst em, whether the engine is running or not.

Gasoline is a very volatile fuel, so total VOC emissions from gasoline powered vehicles

have a large evaporative component. Diesel and je t fuels are of very low volatility, so

evaporative emissions from diesel and turbi ne engines are a much smaller part of their

total VOC emissions. Evaporative emission s for CNG or LPG powered vehicles are

negligible because their fuel tanks and systems are of necessity, sealed.

Evaporative and exhaust VOC emissions can be calculated separately for most mobile

source categories. Evaporative emissions do not include VOC emissions that occur

during refueling.

Refueling Emissions: These emissions are the third category of mobile source

emissions. Refueling emissi ons are entirely VOC. Alth ough they result from the

evaporation of fuel, they ar e distinct from, and not dire ctly related to, evaporative

emissions as defined above.

Refueling emissions have two subcomponents:

• Displacement emissions . These occur when new fuel is transferred into a partly

filled tank--be it a service station stor age tank, a portable fuel container (gas

can), or a vehicle or engine’s fuel tank; displacing the air in the tank and forcing

that vapor-rich air out the inlet pipe or other vent. There are two stages of

displacement emissions:

o “ Stage I ” emissions occur when the underground storage tanks at a

service station are being refilled;

## 19 o “ Stage II ” emissions occur when a motor vehicle (or gas can) is being

refueled.

NOTE: These emissions are covered in , “Area Sources,” section 3.6.

• Spill emissions . These occur when drops of fuel drip or splash on the ground

during or after refueling and evaporate away.

4.2 Ohio On-Road Mobile Source Inventory

The inventory of on-road mobile source emissions was developed in conjunction with

the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT), Lake Michigan Air Director’s

Consortium (LADCO), Unit ed States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), and

the Ohio EPA (OEPA). Estimates of the amounts of NOx and VO C are reported by

county in tons per day. Emissions are repor ted for a typical ozone season weekday in

the summer of 2005.

4.2.1 Emission Inventories Developed with MOBILE6 Model

MOBILE6 Overview:

MOBILE6 is a computer program that es timates hydrocarbon (HC), carbon monoxide

(CO), oxides of nitrogen (NO

x 

## ), exhaust particulate matter (which consists of several

components), tire wear particula te matter, brake wear particu late matter, sulfur dioxide

(SO 2 

## ), ammonia (NH 3 

## ), six hazardous air pollutant (HAP), and carbon dioxide (CO 2 

## )

emission factors for gasoline-f ueled and diesel highway moto r vehicles, and for certain

specialized vehicles such as natural-gas-fuel ed or electric vehicles that may replace

them. The program uses the calculation procedures presented in technical reports

posted on EPA's MOBILE6 Web page http ://www.epa.gov/otaq/models.htm.

MOBILE6 emission factor estimates depend on various conditions, such as ambient

temperatures, travel speeds, operating modes, fuel volatility, and mileage accrual rates.

Many of the variables affe cting vehicle emissions can be specified by the user.

MOBILE6 will estimate emission factors fo r any calendar year between 1952 and 2050,

inclusive. Vehicles from the 25 most re cent model years are considered to be in

operation in each calendar year.

4.2.2 MOBILE6 Defaults:

MOBILE6 includes default values for a wide range of conditions that affect emissions.

These defaults are designed to represent “ national average” input data values. Users

who desire a more precise estimate of local emissions can substitute information that

more specifically reflects local conditions. Use of local input data will be particularly

common when the local emission inventor y is to be constructed from separate

## 20 estimates of roadways, geographic areas, or ti mes of day, in which fleet or traffic

conditions vary considerably.

A list of MOBILE6 input parameters is provi ded below. Most of these inputs are optional

because the model will supply default values unless alternate data are provided.

4.2.3 MOBILE6 Input Parameters

• Calendar year

• Month (January, July)

• Hourly Temperature

• Altitude (high, low)

• Weekend/weekday

• Fuel characteristics (Reid va por pressure, sulfur content,

oxygenate content, etc.)

• Humidity and solar load

• Registration (age) distribution by vehicle class

• Annual mileage accumulation by vehicle class

• Diesel sales fractions by vehicle class and model year

• Average speed distribution by hour and roadway

• Distribution of vehicle miles traveled by roadway type

• Engine starts per day by vehi cle class and distribution by hour

• Engine start soak time distribution by hour

• Trip end distribution by hour

• Average trip length distribution

• Hot soak duration

• Distribution of vehicle miles traveled by vehicle class

• Full, partial, and multiple diurnal distribution by hour

• Inspection and maintenance ( I/M) program description

• Anti-tampering inspection program description

• Stage II refueling emissions inspection program description

• Natural gas vehicle fractions

• HC species output

• Particle size cutoff

• Emissions factors for PM and HAP

• 

## Output format specific ations and selections

4.2.4 MOBILE6 References

The following publications prov ide much of the guidance fo r the preparation of the onhighway inventory.

EPA-450/4-81-026d (Revised), now EPA/450-R-92-009, Procedures for Emission

Inventory Preparation , Volume IV: Mobile Sources , December 1992. Hereafter,

“Procedures Vol. IV”. The 1992 vers ion is still the definitive document on

## 21 inventories. If a previous edition is referr ed to, the fact will be not ed as, for example,

“the 1989 Procedures Vol. IV” or “Volume IV, 1989 edition”.

EPA420-R-03-010, User’s Guide to MOBILE6.1 and MOBILE6.2: Mobile Source

Emission Factor Model

, August 2003. This is the User’s Guide for the official

MOBILE6.2.03 on-highway mobile source em ission factor model and will usually be

referred to as the M6.2 (or simply M6) User’s Guide (UG). The M6 model in its

various versions was developed and publis hed by Assessment & Modeling Division

(AMD) of the National Vehicle & Fuels Em issions Laboratory (NVFEL) in Ann Arbor,

Michigan. The NVFEL is part of USE PA Office of Transportation & Air Quality

(OTAQ), formerly the Office of Mobile Sources (OMS).

Technical Guidance on the Use of MOBILE6 for Emission Inventory

Preparation , August 2004. Hereafter, the M6 “Technical Guidance [Document]” or

“TGD”. The TGD is the pr imary source of guidance on M6 inputs and an invaluable

adjunct to the M6 User’s Guide.

USEPA document “Frequently Asked Questions on MOBILE6” , 16 January

2002. Hereafter, [M6] “FAQ”. This document was published along with the M6

TGD.

USEPA memo, “Policy Guidance on the Use of MOBILE6 for SIP Development

and Transportation Conformity” , dated 18 January 2002, from John Seitz,

Director of OAQPS, and Mar go Oge, Director of OTAQ, to Regional Air Division

Directors.

4.3 Ohio’s Alternate Data for MOBILE6

Alternative data is state-specif ic data that is used in the M obile6 runs. Using local data

is preferred to using the default data in Mobi le6. Efforts are made to collect as much

local data as possible.

4.3.1 Vehicle Registra tion Distribution by Age

Overview:

The vehicle age distribution determines the fr action of vehicles operating within each

emissions control requirement standard and the deterioration of the emission control

technology.

Emission rates vary widely between new and older vehicles. Thus, even small changes

in fleet age, particularly for older vehicles , may result in large changes in emission

totals.

## 22 The MOBILE6 model requires esti mates of a distribution of r egistered vehicles by age

and vehicle category for current and future years. MOBILE6 default values were

developed using national level vehicle registration data by age and class for July 1,

1996. EPA developed a methodology to convert t he July 1, 1996 registration profile into

a general registration distribut ion by age and by vehicle ca tegory for some 6 composite

(gasoline and diesel) vehicle types plus motorcycles. To project future changes, EPA

evaluated general sales growth and vehicle scrappage trends for the total light-duty

vehicle in-use fleet and the total heavy-dut y vehicle in-use fleet, and made minor

adjustments, where possible, to reflect some of the differences between vehicle

categories.

Description: The MOBILE6 model requires estima tes of a distribution of registered

vehicles by age and vehicle category for curr ent and future years. OEPA chose to use

local vehicle registration data provided by the Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles (BMV)

which was sent to the Lake Michigan Air Dir ectors Consortium (LADCO) to develop

these inputs. LADCO then contracted with a subcontractor to breakout the age

distribution data from the Vehicle Identification Num bers (VIN).

Note: It was learned during the course of this inventory that there were some

discrepancies in the age distribution data. But it was too large of a project to reevaluate

the data prior to this invent ory. This will be corrected in the next inventory (2008).

Method Applicability: This approach is most applic able in areas where there are

significant differences in the local vehicle fleet age distribution rela tive to the national

average.

Data Sources and Procedures: This approach involves using local vehicle registration

data. This is typically available at the county level, but may also be applied using

statewide data from the stat e motor vehicle registration office. The fleet age should be

representative of the vehicle fleet over the small urban or rural area under question.

Advantages:

• Uses locally specific registration data, which is likely more representative of the

local area than t he national default.

• Requires minimal additional resources, par ticularly if data is readily available at

the county or local level fr om the State departm ent of motor vehicle registration.

• Recommended by EPA and generally is encouraged as a preferred approach

over the national default approach.

## 23 4.3.2 Daily Vehicle Miles Traveled (DVMT)

Overview:

In coordination with Ohio Metropolitan Pl anning Organizations (MPOs), the Ohio

Department of Transportation (ODOT) provi ded Daily Vehicle Miles Traveled (DVMT)

data and travel demand model (TDM) data. TDM data will be covered in another

section. Because TDM results are used by t he state and MPOs to fo recast traffic for a

variety of reasons, undergo rigorous calibrati on and validation checks, and are sensitive

to roadway capacity/travel time improvement s, the TDMs are considered the best tool

for emissions forecasting. Therefore, the DVMT data discussed in this section is not

used directly for all areas of Ohio. In countie s where it is not used directly it is used for

making rough emissions estimates where model s do not exist or where time prohibits

the use of TDMs. DVMT is a simple mechan ism to measure how much traffic is flowing

along a roadway during an average 24 hour peri od. This simple formula multiplies

Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) by the length of the roadway. For example; if a

roadway is 2 miles in length and the AADT is 4000 vehicles per day the DVMT would be

computed by multiplying 2* 4,000 =8,000 or 8,000 DVMT.

County-By-County DVMT is computed usin g the State of Ohio, Department of

Transportation’s Roadway Information F iles and the annual Highway Performance

Monitoring System (HPMS) Summary Reports . DVMT’s are computed for all of the

Federal Functional Class (FC) categories within each of Ohio’s 88 counties.

The AADT and Roadway length information prov ides a very accurate estimate of

statewide total DVMT for The State Highway S ystem (Interstate, US and State Routes).

County total DVMT are consistent and cons idered a good source of county level DVMT

for countywide emissions estimates. For roadways that are not part of the State

Highway System, various representative count s were used, such as: railroad crossing

counts, HPMS Sample Section Counts, etc. All traffic count data that was not collected

during the current year has had statewide growth factors applied to account for

systematic growth.

Given the previously mentioned methodologies, the DVMT data is more accurate on

roads functionally classified as collector or above.

Table 4-1 Federal Func tional Class Categories:

01 - Rural Interstate

02 - Rural Principal Arterial

06 - Rural Minor Arterial

07 - Rural Major Collector

08 - Rural Minor Collector

09 - Rural Local 11 - Urban Interstate

12 - Urban Freeway & Expressway

14 - Urban Principal Arterial

16 - Urban Minor Arterial

17 - Urban Collector

19 - Urban Local

## 24 Table 4-2 DVMT County Summary:

For PDF web based tables of 2005 DVMT by county see:

http://www.dot.state.oh.us /techservsite/availpro/Road_%20Infor/KDVMT/vmt2005.pdf

Disclaimer by ODOT:

The above PDF web based tables contain the State of Ohio's adjusted county DVMT's

and road mileage for the years 1990 - 2005. Please be aware that the numbers are

estimates only. The factoring process used annual, estimated, and statewide ADT

(Average Daily Traffic) growth factors, deriv ed from the output of a limited number of

traffic counting stations around the state. Although the growth factors are available by

functional class, they are more reliable for major roads such as interstates or

expressways, which are relatively well-sampl ed, than for local roads or collectors. The

numbers also do no allow for periodic, large- scale functional reclassification actions

## 25 which reassign selected roads or road segm ents from one functional class to another.

The Ohio Department of Transportation t herefore does not warr ant the accuracy,

completeness, or reliability of these estimates for your research. We also do not

assume responsibility for any incorrectness that may occur.

4.3.3 VMT From Travel Demand Models (TDM)

Overview:

Travel demand forecast modeling is perform ed by the Ohio Metropolitan Planning

Organizations (MPOs) and ODOT for a multit ude of purposes including the preparation

of regional emissions estimate s. The ODOT Office of Te chnical Services’ Modeling &

Forecasting Section recommends that Ohio ’s TDMs and ODOT’s conformity analysis

methods be used to establish the roadway mob ile source portion of Ohio’s SIP budget

to assure consistent methods are used for transportation conformity analysis and

budgets. Therefore, ODOT provided both MPO regional TDM runs and statewide TDM

runs with associated data to OEPA and LADC O. The ODOT provided model run data

for years 2002, 2005, 2009, 2012, and 2018.

Data provided included loaded networks in both CSV format and GIS shape files, trip

end summaries, zone boundary GIS shape files, intra-zonal trip VMT estimates, and

VMT summaries for each of the loaded networ ks. Additional post processing data was

provided including but not lim ited to metadata describing the loaded networks, Hourly

distribution by functional cla ss, speed profiles, day of week / weekend / monthly car and

truck traffic profiles, 2009 & 2018 VMT RPO data sets, state wide VMT growth rates for

local traffic, and a 2005 VMT summary comparison spreadsheet. It should be noted

that among other things, the loaded TDM Netw orks contain distance and daily volumes

from which VMT is computed.

Network volumes are post processed to esti mate VMT by hour of day. The hourly

volumes and capacity, posted speed limi t, and type of roadway for each roadway

segment are then used to estimate aver age hourly speeds needed for MOBILE6 based

emissions estimates. Modelin g by segment by hour of day in this way makes emissions

estimates more sensitive to the effects of roadway improvements. This allows

transportation planners to evaluate the relati ve emissions affect of improvements to

individual roadways as well as packages of improvements and the entire set of planned

roadway improvement projec ts air quality impacts of construction programs.

## 26 4.3.4 Speed Di stribution Profiles

Overview:

ODOT provided speed distribution profiles to LADCO. A couple of different sets of

speed distribution profiles were provided to OEPA and LADCO for their use, a table of

space mean speeds by functional class for use with DVMTs and link group speed

curves for post processing travel demand model traffic forecasts. Both sets of speed

profiles are based on the same speed study c onducted by ODOT. The speed study is

documented in “Statewide Travel Time Study, May 2001 by Greg Giaimo, Ohio

Department of Transportation ”. When OEPA asked for s peeds for use with MOBILE6

for development of CERR, ODOT provided a set of speeds based on that statewide

travel time study. Those speeds are doc umented in a technical memorandum titled

“Estimation of Average Speed by Functional Class for MOBILE6 Runs ” dated

5/27/2004. Readers should refer to those docum ents for the details. Here the contents

of the technical memo, Estimated Average Speed by Functional Class, are summarized.

Space Mean Speeds by Functional Class for U se with County Level DVMT, HPMS:

The memo states that the s peeds which the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT)

had been using prior to that date, 2004, fo r air quality analysis estimates based on

County DVMT summaries, were developed by a former ODOT employee for addressing

the one (1) hour standards conformity ru les established due to 1990 emissions

exceedances. No documentation was found in ODOT’s files on the origin of these

average speed values or how they were esti mated. In addition, EPA has requirements

for using latest planning assumptions for ai r quality conformity analyses. Therefore,

ODOT believed that it was in the state’s best interest to use the mo st recent available

data to provide a new set of estimated av erage speeds consistent with those used for

urban area travel demand models which were under development at that time. The

memo contains comparisons of 2002 speed dat a obtained from traf fic count equipment,

automatic traffic recorders (ATRs) which co llect data continuously throughout the year.

It also contains comparisons of the new speeds with those used to address the one

hour standard Gebhart’s. The graphs shown in figure 1, taken from the memo, illustrate

the comparisons. The first graph compares time mean speeds from the ATRs with

space mean speeds from ODOTs travel time study done in 2001and with the speeds

used for addressing the one hour standard.

## 27 Figure 1 - Speed Comparison Graphs

Speeds Comparison

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0

FC01 FC 0

6

F C0 8

F C1 1 FC1 4 FC1 7



## Functional ClassSpeed Average Speed

1990 Analysis

Speeds

2001 Speed Study



# Speeds Comparison

0 20 40 60 80 100

FC 0

1 FC 06

F C08

F C11 FC14 FC 1

7

R

AMPS



## Functional ClassSpeed 

## Average Speed

Min. Avg Speed

Max. Avg. Speed

Gebhardt's Speeds

Spd Study Est

Speeds

Spd Study Greg Est



## The following caution statem ent was taken from the Estimation of Average Speed by

Functional Class memo.

CAUTION 

# : It should be noted that speeds on facilities falling in any one of the federal

functional classifications vary greatly bet ween roadways, between hour of the day, and

day of the week. So these provide only very rough estimates of speed and should be

used with caution. In addition, it is expec ted that these average statewide speeds are

higher than the average speeds in the non-attainment areas because the non## 28 attainment counties tend to be more popul ated and more congested. The document

“Highway Vehicle Speed Es timation Procedures For Use in Emission Inventories”,

September 1991 by Earl Ruiter of Cambridge Systematics Inc. is referenced by EPA’s

documented procedures for emission inventor y preparation. This document suggests

post processing travel demand model traffic assignment results to estimate average

speeds.

Final space mean speeds that ODOT provi ded are summarized in the Table 1 below:

Table 4-3 Speed by Federal Functional Class

Functional Class 1990 Analysis 2001 Speed Study

Speeds Speeds

FC01 57.3 64.0

FC02 45.3 53.0

FC06 39.9 53.0

FC07 35.1 43.1

FC08 30.5 43.1

FC09 28.0 43.1

FC11 46.3 61.6

FC12 43.3 61.6

FC14 18.9 29.3

FC16 19.6 29.3

FC17 19.6 29.2

FC19 19.6 23.8

It was decided by mutual agreement among individuals within the ODOT Office of

Technical Services that these new s pace mean speed based average speed estimates

were reproducible and defensib le since they are well docu mented and should therefore

be the speeds used with HPMS** VMT if any year 2002 emissions budget work is done

using only the county level VMT summaries discussed in section 5.3.2 Daily Vehicle

Miles Traveled (DVMT).

** Note that HPMS VMT is a statewide VMT estimate and the county level DVMT

summaries are consistent with the HPMS VMT so the county level DVMT summaries

are loosely referred to as HPMS VMTs even though in fact they are not.

4.3.5 Link Group Speed Curves:

The ODOT Modeling & Forecasting Section recommends that Ohio’s travel demand

forecasting models and ODOT’s conformity anal ysis methods be used to establish the

roadway mobile source portion of Ohio’s SIP budget for reasons already mentioned in

5.3.2 and to assure consistent methods are used for transportation conformity

demonstration analyses and budget s. Therefore, ODOT pr ovided travel demand model

runs and the speed curves by link group that ODOT uses for the speed estimates within

## 29 the post processing of travel demand model runs for estimating regional emissions.

Table 2 shows these link group curves.

Table 4-4 Link Group Cod es & Associated BPR Curves

Link

Group Facility

Type Free Flow

Speed Areatype a b

1 Freeway 75 Any 0.39 6.3

2 Freeway 70 Any 0.32 7.0

3 Freeway 65 Any 0.25 9.0

4 Freeway 60 Any 0.18 8.5

5 Freeway 55 Any 0.10 10.0

6 Multi-Lane 60 Rural 0.09 6.0

7 Multi-Lane 55 Rural 0.08 6.0

8 Multi-Lane 50 Rural 0.07 6.0

9 Multi-Lane 45 Rural 0.07 6.0

10 2 Lane Any Rural 0.34 4.0

10 Urban

Street 50 Suburban 0.34 4.0

11 Urban

Street 50 Urban 0.74 5.0

12 Urban

Street 50 CBD 1.16 6.0

13 Urban

Street 40 Suburban 0.38 5.0

14 Urban

Street 40 Urban 0.70 5.0

15 Urban

Street 40 CBD 1.00 5.0

16 Urban

Street 35 Suburban 0.96 5.0

17 Urban

Street 35 Urban 1.00 5.0

18 Urban

Street 35 CBD 1.40 5.0

19 Urban

Street 30 Suburban 1.11 5.0

20 Urban

Street 30 Urban 1.20 5.0

21 Urban

Street 30 CBD 1.50 5.0

Note: a and b are the BPR curv e parameters for the equation

T = T 0 

## {1 + a * (V/C)^b]

## 30 More complete details about emissions mode ling process employed by ODOT may be

found in ODOT documentations. The docum ent titled “Congestion Management & Air

Quality Analysis (CMAQ) Program Docu mentation” dated December 2005 may be

obtained from the ODOT web site at www.dot.state.oh.us/urban/data/cmaq.doc

(Microsoft Word document)

4.4 Mobile6 Inputs:

The following table contains the inputs s upplied to LADCO to process our mobile

inventory.

4.4.1 Ohio’s 2005 MOBILE6 Inputs

The following tables are the result of a joint meeting between Ohio EPA, ODOT, and

MPOs from around the state. At that meeting Mobile6 inputs were discussed and

efforts were made to verify the sources of data inputs for Moble6. Dialogue has

continued between the parties.

For historical reference:

>>> Dave Moore <Dave.Moore1@dot.s tate.oh.us> 4/10/2006 2:13 PM >>>

All,

An air quality coordination meeting has been scheduled for April 27, 2006 at 10:00 AM at ODOT Central

Office conference room GA. The primary purpose of this meeting is to discuss development of 2002

mobile source inventories for use in developi ng the Ohio 2007 8-Hour Ozone SIP Attainment

Demonstrations. See meeting agen da below. OEPA is working to ward a June 15, 2006 schedule for

submitting the 2002 invent ories to US EPA.

A key component of the meeting will be to review a nd confirm the MOBILE6.2 i nput parameters, by Ohio

a/q area, for use in developing the 2002 mobile inve ntories. See draft templa te below. The Ohio MPO

travel demand models will be used to generate t he 2002 VMT inputs to MOBILE. Thanks, DM

DM

## 31 IMPORTANT NOTICE: The following tables are not to be used for inventory purposes

as the data is subject to change. For the cu rrent input table, contact Ohio EPA, Division

of Air Pollution Control.

Table 4-5 Mobile Inputs



# Cleveland-Akron 2005 Ozone M6.2 Inputs

Includes the following counties:

Ashtabula, Cuyahoga, Geauga, Lake, Lorain, Medina, Portage, Summit



## State Programs

Input

Stage II Refueling 93/3/86/86

Anti-tampering Programs 96/78/50/22222/21111111/1/12/098./12111112

I/M Programs Yes

Exclude Ashtabula County - No I/M program

Program 1 2004 2050 2 T/O OBD I/M

Model Years 1 1996 2050

Vehicles 1 22222 21111111 1

Stringency 1 30.0

Compliance 1 98.0

Waiver Rates 1 1.0 1.0

Cutpoints

Exemption Age 1 25

Grace Period 1 4

NO TTC Credits

Effectiveness

DESC file

Program 2 2004 2050 2 T/O EVAP OBD & GC

Model Years 2 1996 2050

Vehicles 2 22222 11111111 1

Stringency

Compliance 2 98.0

Waiver Rates 2 1.0 1.0

Cutpoints

Exemption Age 2 25

Grace Period 2 4

NO TTC Credits

Effectiveness

DESC file

Program 3 2001 2003 2 T/O ASM 2525 PHASE-IN

## 32 Model Years 3 1996 2003

Vehicles 3 22222 21111111 1

Stringency 3 30.0

Compliance 3 98.0

Waiver Rates 3 3.0 1.0

Cutpoints

Exemption Age 3 25

Grace Period 3 2

NO TTC Credits

Effectiveness

DESC file

Program 4 2001 2050 2 T/O ASM 2525 PHASE-IN

Model Years 4 1975 1995

Vehicles 4 22222 21111111 1

Stringency 4 30.0

Compliance 4 98.0

Waiver Rates 4 3.0 1.0

Cutpoints

Exemption Age 4 25

Grace Period 4 4

NO TTC Credits

Effectiveness

DESC file

Program 5 1998 2000 2 T/O LOADED/IDLE

Model Years 5 1975 2000

Vehicles 5 22222 21111111 1

Stringency 5 30.0

Compliance 5 98.0

Waiver Rates 5 3.0 1.0

Cutpoints

Exemption Age 5 25

Grace Period 5 2

NO TTC Credits

Effectiveness

DESC file

Program 6 1996 1997 2 T/O IM240

Model Years 6 1975 1997

Vehicles 6 22222 21111111 1

Stringency 6 30.0

Compliance 6 98.0

Waiver Rates 6 3.0 1.0

Cutpoints 6 CUTPOINT.D

Exemption Age 6 25

Grace Period 6 2

NO TTC Credits

Effectiveness

DESC file

## 33 Program 7 1996 2050 2 T/O GC

Model Years 7 1975 1995

Vehicles 7 22222 21111111 1

Stringency

Compliance 7 98.0

Waiver Rates 7 3.0 1.0

Cutpoints

Exemption Age 7 25

Grace Period 7 2

NO TTC Credits

Effectiveness

DESC file



## Fuel Commands

Fuel Program 1

Oxygenated Fuels 0.00 0.42 0.00 0.036 2

Fuel RVP 9



## Alternative Emission Regulati ons and Control Measures

Rebuild Effects 0.1



## External Conditions Commands

Calendar Year 2005

Evaluation Month 7

Min/Max Temperature National Climatic Data Center



## Vehicle Fleet Characteristic Commands

Registration Distribution Variable

## 34 

# Cincinnati-Dayton-Springfield 2005 Ozone M6.2 Inputs

Includes the following counties:

Ohio : Butler, Clark, Clermont, Clinton, Greene, Hamilton, Miami, Montgomery,

Warren

Indiana : Lawrenceburg Twp., Dearborn County

Kentucky : Boone, Campbell and Kenton counties



## State Programs

Input

Note: Indiana and Kentucky inputs may not coincide with Ohio inputs

Stage II Refueling 93/3/86/86

Anti-tampering Programs 96/78/05/22222/21111111/1/12/098./12111112

I/M Programs Yes

Excludes Clinton Co. and Miami Co., OH, Dearborn County, IN - No I/M program

Note: I/M inputs for Kentucky counties are not included

Program 1 2004 2050 2 T/O OBD I/M

Model Years 1 1996 2050

Vehicles 1 22222 21111111 1

Stringency 1 30.0

Compliance 1 98.0

Waiver Rates 1 1.0 1.0

Cutpoints

Exemption Age 1 25

Grace Period 1 2

NO TTC Credits

Effectiveness

DESC file

Program 2 2004 2050 2 T/O EVAP OBD & GC

Model Years 2 1996 2050

Vehicles 2 22222 11111111 1

Stringency

Compliance 2 98.0

Waiver Rates 2 1.0 1.0

Cutpoints

Exemption Age 2 25

Grace Period 2 2

NO TTC Credits

Effectiveness

DESC file

Program 3 2001 2003 2 T/O ASM 2525 PHASE-IN

Model Years 3 1996 2003

Vehicles 3 22222 21111111 1

Stringency 3 30.0

Compliance 3 98.0

## 35 Waiver Rates 3 3.0 1.0

Cutpoints

Exemption Age 3 25

Grace Period 3 2

NO TTC Credits

Effectiveness

DESC file

Program 4 2001 2050 2 T/O ASM 2525 PHASE-IN

Model Years 4 1975 1995

Vehicles 4 22222 21111111 1

Stringency 4 30.0

Compliance 4 98.0

Waiver Rates 4 3.0 1.0

Cutpoints

Exemption Age 4 25

Grace Period 4 4

NO TTC Credits

Effectiveness

DESC file

Program 5 1998 2000 2 T/O LOADED/IDLE

Model Years 5 1975 2000

Vehicles 5 22222 21111111 1

Stringency 5 30.0

Compliance 5 98.0

Waiver Rates 5 3.0 1.0

Cutpoints

Exemption Age 5 25

Grace Period 5 2

NO TTC Credits

Effectiveness

DESC file

Program 6 1996 1997 2 T/O IM240

Model Years 6 1975 1997

Vehicles 6 22222 21111111 1

Stringency 6 30.0

Compliance 6 98.0

Waiver Rates 6 3.0 1.0

Cutpoints 6 CUTPOINT.D

Exemption Age 6 25

Grace Period 6 2

NO TTC Credits

Effectiveness

DESC file

Program 7 1996 2050 2 T/O GC

Model Years 7 1975 1995

Vehicles 7 22222 21111111 1

## 36 Stringency

Compliance 7 98.0

Waiver Rates 7 3.0 1.0

Cutpoints

Exemption Age 7 25

Grace Period 7 2

NO TTC Credits

Effectiveness

DESC file



## Fuel Commands

Fuel Program 1

Oxygenated Fuels 0.00 0.42 0.00 0.036 2

Fuel RVP 9



## Alternative Emission Regulati ons and Control Measures

Rebuild Effects 0.1



## External Conditions Commands

Calendar Year 2005

Evaluation Month 7

Min/Max Temperature National Climatic Data Center



## Vehicle Fleet Characteristic Commands

Registration Distribution Variable

## 37 

# Other Areas ( excluding NOACA/AMATS 

# and OKI/MVRPC 

# ) Ozone M6.2

Inputs

Includes the following counties:

Ohio : Belmont, Columbiana, Delaware, Fairfield, Franklin, Jefferson, Knox, Licking,

Lucas,Madison, Mahoning, Pickaway, Trumball, Wood



## Fuel Commands

Input

Fuel Program 1

Oxygenated Fuels 0.00 0.42 0.00 0.036 2

Fuel RVP 9



## Alternative Emission Regulati ons and Control Measures

Rebuild Effects 0.1 (0.30 for 2018)



## External Conditions Commands

Calendar Year All

Evaluation Month 7

Min/Max Temperature National Climatic Data Center



## Vehicle Fleet Characteristic Commands

Registration

Distribution Variable



## 4.5 Ohio’s Mobile Emission Data Processed by LADCO (Lake Michigan Air

Director’s Consortium):

2005 TDM and Mobile6 input data were provided to LADCO for processing. The data

was processed by LADCO with T3 to prepare it as an input into the ConCEPT model.

T3 and ConCEPT are described as follows.

## 38 4.5.1 T3--Development of Link-Level Mobile Source Emission Inventories:

Highly resolved emission inventories for on- road mobile sources are needed for air

quality modeling to develop the necessary technical support for new State

Implementation Plans (SIPs) fo r regional haze, fine particles , and ozone. Emissions for

on-road motor vehicles are estimated using vehi cle miles traveled, tr ip starts and ends,

speed, and other activity data developed by State Agencies and Metropolitan Planning

Organizations (MPOs) using transportati on demand models (TDMs), and emission

factors from EPA's MOBILE6 model. To s upport this modeling in the upper Midwest,

ENVIRON, working with LADCO, State DOTs, and local MPOs, has developed a

software tool (the TDM Transformation Tool, or "T3") that takes TDM output from

approximately twenty transportation networ ks using a variety of models, applies

appropriate data transformations , and outputs link- and county-le vel activity data in a

uniform format for input to the CONCEPT emissions processing model (a new

emissions processing model also developed wit h funding from LADCO). In a parallel

effort, analyses of extensive automatic tra ffic recorder (ATR) dat a collected by State

DOTs were conducted to develop temporal profiles (hour of day , day of week, and

month of year) of vehicle counts and vehicl e mix by roadway type for developing the

detailed on-road emissi on inventories.

T3 provides a conduit from the projections of traffic demand model ers regarding vehicle

types, road networks, and vehicle activity to the activity data required by emissions

modelers. The primary goals of T3 are to provide an easy mechanism for incorporating

TDM model outputs in as "raw" a format as possible, while simult aneously providing a

great degree of flexibility in representing t he TDM projections in terms acceptable to

most air quality models. These goal s have been achieved through the use of a

dimensional transformation approach, w here the dimensions of the various

transformations are user-defined - hence the name of the tool.

By Stella Shepard, Alison K. Pollack, John Haasbeek, ENVIRON International

Corporation, 101 Rowland Way, Su ite 220, Novato, CA. 94945

& Mark Janssen, Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium (LADCO ), 2250 E. Devon

Avenue # 250, Des Plaines, IL 60018, janssen@ladco.org

4.5.2 ConCEPT--Consolidated Community Emissions Processing Tool an OpenSource Tool for the Emi ssions Modeling Community:

The new CONCEPT (CONsolidated Communi ty Emissions Processing Tool)

Emissions Processor is now available for use by the emissions modeling community.

Developed as joint project between Alpine Geophysics, LLC and ENVIRON Corporation,

with Midwest RPO and joint RPO funding, the CONCEPT model combines the best

attributes of current emissions modeling syste ms into an open source model highlighting

the following features:

• Open Source. Writt en primarily in PostgreSQL, th e software required for running

## 39 CONCEPT is in the public dom ain. The model itself is GNU Public License (GPL)

compliant and users are encouraged to make additions and enhancements to the

modeling system.

• Transparent. The database structur e of the model makes the system easy to

understand, and the modeling codes themselv es are extremely well documented to

encourage user participation in the customizing the system for specific modeling

requirements.

• Quality Control. The CONCEPT model structure an d implementation allows for

multiple levels of QA analysis during every step of the emissions calculation process.

Using the database structures, an emissions modeler can easily trace a process or

facility and review the calculat ion procedures and assumptions for any emissions value.

The CONCEPT model includes modules for the major emissions source

categories: area source, point source, on-ro ad motor vehicles, non-road motor vehicles

and biogenic emissions, as well as a num ber of supporting modules, including spatial

allocation factor development, speciation pr ofile development, growth and control for

point and area sources, and CEM point sour ce emissions handling. The emissions

modeling community has alr eady begun development of addi tional CONCEPT support

modules including CEM preproce ssing software, graphical QA tools, and an interface to

the traffic demand models for on-road mo tor vehicle emissions estimation.

By Cyndi Loomis, James G. Wilkinson, Alpine Geophysics, LLC, & John Haasbeek,

Alison Pollack, ENVIRON Corporation. & Mark Janssen, Lake Michigan Air Directors

Consortium (LADCO), 2250 E. Devon Av enue # 250, Des Plaines, IL 60018,

janssen@ladco.org

4.5.3 LADCO Ohio Data Outputs for 2005:

The following LADCO outputs and documents can be found at:

www.ladco.org/tech/e mis/net05/index.html

Table 4-6 LADCO Data Output

Sta

te Network T3

Descripti

on DOC M6

Inpu

ts VM

T vs

HP

MS

Exc

el Average

Day

VMT

(this

should

match

conformi

ty

inventory

) Co

unt

y

Em

issi

on

s

Re

por

t All

Pollut

ants

After

Speci

ation Dropped

VMT M6

Run

Summ

ary Pollut

ant

T otals

(Short

) Raw

Summ

ary (pol,ve

h,

etype) Hourly

Tempo

ral

Summ

ary Hourly

Veh

Mix

Summ

ary Hourly

Speed

Summ

ary

(with

volum

e/

capaci

ty)

OH AKRON AKRON OH OH AKRON 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

## 40 OH CANTON CANTON OH OH CANTON 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

OH CINCI CINCI OH OH CINCI 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

OH CLEVE CLEVE OH OH CLEVE 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

OH COLUMB

US COLUMB

US OH OH COLUMB

US 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

OH SPRING

FLD SPRING

FLD OH OH SPRING

FLD 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

OH TOLEDO TOLEDO OH OH TOLEDO 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

OH YNGSTO

WN YNGSTO

WN OH OH YNGSTO

WN 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

OH STATEW

D STATEW

D OH OH STATEW

D 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1



## Additional Documents on LADCO Web Page:

“Comparison to EPA's Default Model NMIM”

“How we Build the 2005 Vmt/Networks”

“Spreadsheet/Graphics on Vehicle Mix”

“Background on the T3 Tool “

4.6 MPO Contact Table

Table 4-7 County Summary Ta ble of MPOs by County

FIPS County Model Network MPO Contact Person

39001 Adams Statewide

39003 Allen Statewide Lima Allen County Regional

Planning Commission Tom Mazur

39005 Ashland Statewide

39007 Ashtabula Statewide

39009 Athens Statewide

39011 Auglaize Statewide

39013 Belmont Statewide Bel-O-Mar Regional Council

and Interstate Planning

Commission Rakesh Sharma

39015 Brown Statewide

39017 Butler Cincinnat/Dayton Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana

Regional Council of

Governments Andy Reser

39019 Carroll Statewide

39021 Champaign Statewide

39023 Clark Springfield Coordinating Committee of

the Clark County-Springfield Eric Ottoson

## 41 Transportation Study

39025 Clermont Cincinnat/Dayton Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana

Regional Council of

Governments Andy Reser

39027 Clinton Statewide

39029 Columbiana Statewide

39031 Coshocton Statewide

39033 Crawford Statewide

39035 Cuyahoga Cleveland Northeast Ohio Areawide

Coordinating Agency Bill Davis

39037 Darke Statewide

39039 Defiance Statewide

39041 Delaware Columbus Mid-Ohio Regional Planning

Commission Nick Gill

39043 Erie Statewide

39045 Fairfield Statewide

39047 Fayette Statewide

39049 Franklin Columbus Mid-Ohio Regional Planning

Commission Nick Gill

39051 Fulton Statewide

39053 Gallia Statewide

39055 Geauga Cleveland Northeast Ohio Areawide

Coordinating Agency Bill Davis

39057 Greene Cincinnat/Dayton Miami Valley Regional

Planning Commission Ana Ramirez

39059 Guernsey Statewide

39061 Hamilton Cincinnat/Dayton Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana

Regional Council of

Governments Andy Reser

39063 Hancock Statewide

39065 Hardin Statewide

39067 Harrison Statewide

39069 Henry Statewide

39071 Highland Statewide

39073 Hocking Statewide

39075 Holmes Statewide

39077 Huron Statewide

39079 Jackson Statewide

39081 Jefferson Statewide Brooke-Hancock-Jefferson

Transportation Study Policy

Committee Mike Proprocki

39083 Knox Statewide

39085 Lake Cleveland Northeast Ohio Areawide

Coordinating Agency Bill Davis

39087 Lawrence Statewide KYOVA Interstate Planning

Commission

39089 Licking Columbus Licking County Area

Transportation Study Matthew Hill

39091 Logan Statewide

39093 Lorain Cleveland Northeast Ohio Areawide Bill Davis

## 42 Coordinating Agency

39095 Lucas Toledo Toledo Metropolitan Area

Council of Governments Sujatha Mohanakrishnan

39097 Madison Statewide

39099 Mahoning Youngstown Eastgate Regional Council

of Governments R.P. Samulka

39101 Marion Statewide

39103 Medina Cleveland Northeast Ohio Areawide

Coordinating Agency Bill Davis

39105 Meigs Statewide

39107 Mercer Statewide

39109 Miami Cincinnat/Dayton Miami Valley Regional

Planning Commission Ana Ramirez

39111 Monroe Statewide

39113 Montgomery Cincinnat/Dayton Miami Valley Regional

Planning Commission Ana Ramirez

39115 Morgan Statewide

39117 Morrow Statewide

39119 Muskingum Statewide

39121 Noble Statewide

39123 Ottawa Statewide

39125 Paulding Statewide

39127 Perry Statewide

39129 Pickaway Statewide

39131 Pike Statewide

39133 Portage Akron Akron Metropolitan Area

Transportation Study Jason Segedy

39135 Preble Statewide

39137 Putnam Statewide

39139 Richland Statewide Richland County Regional

Planning Commission John Adams

39141 Ross Statewide

39143 Sandusky Statewide

39145 Scioto Statewide

39147 Seneca Statewide

39149 Shelby Statewide

39151 Stark Canton Stark County Regional

Planning Commission Dan Slicker

39153 Summit Akron Akron Metropolitan Area

Transportation Study Jason Segedy

39155 Trumbull Youngstown (partial

county model

coverage) Eastgate Regional Council

of Governments R.P. Samulka

39157 Tuscarawas Statewide

39159 Union Statewide

39161 Van Wert Statewide

39163 Vinton Statewide

39165 Warren Cincinnat/Dayton Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana

Regional Council of

Governments Andy Reser, OKI

+

## 43 +

Miami Valley Regional

Planning Commission Ana Ramirez, MVRPC

39167 Washington Statewide Wood-Washington-Wirt

Interstate Planning

Commission

39169 Wayne Statewide

39171 Williams Statewide

39173 Wood Toledo Toledo Metropolitan Area

Council of Governments Sujatha Mohanakrishnan

39175 Wyandot Statewide



## NOTE: Complete MPO information can be found at,

www.dot.state.oh.us/urban/mpomap.htm and at

www.dot.state.oh.us/urban/mpolist.htm#Cleveland

.



# SECTION 5

MARINE, AIRCRAFT and RAIL (MAR) SOURCES

MAR sources are non-road sour ces which are significant enoug h in terms of emissions

to be considered separately from the rest of the non-road sources. The MAR inventory

consists of commercial marines, aircraft and locomotive sources. The marine and

locomotive inventory is generated by Environ 1 

## under contract with LADCO and the

aircraft inventory is generated by Ohio EPA.

5.1 Marine Vessel Sources

The approach to commercial marine emi ssion estimates needed to be flexible because

the activity data was available in many fo rmats. Emission esti mates were determined

either by multiplying engine power, load factor, hours per ye ar of operation, or on the

basis of the number of gall ons of fuel consumed.

Emissions were determined for ten subclasses of vessel types: Deep draft vessels

(DDV) at port, DDV mid-late, push boats (rivers /lakes), tugs, ferries, other special

(excursion) vessels, support vessels, dredges, commercial fishing, and military vessels

(Coast Guard). These were linked to various Ohio lakes and rivers.

Because of the large variety of methodologie s employed, inventory tables for the ten

subcategories are detailed in the comp lete inventory prepared and published by

ENVIRON Internati onal Corporation: LADCO 2005 COMMERCIAL MARINE

EMISSIONS , by Christian E. Li ndhjem, March, 2007.

Emission totals produced by ENVIRON were provided to LADCO to submit to EPA for

Ohio’s State Implementation Plan (SIP).

## 44 5.2 Rail Sources

The primary activity unit used to determine em issions is gallons of fuel consumed.

Emission rates were derived from EPA doc uments provided as support documentation

for the 1997 locomotive emission standards (EPA, 1997). Gallons of fuel consumed

were based on rail activity.

Rail activity was broken down into four Source Category Codes (SCC). Class I, linehaul rail: Large interstate railroad companies like Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern.

Class I,II, III, switching rail: Yard operations. Class II, III line haul: Regional and local

railroads. And Passenger rail: AMTRAK.

Class I, line-haul represents 84.3% of fuel used and the larges t emission’s category.

The complete emission’s inventory was prepared and published by ENVIRON

International Corporation: LADCO 2005 LOCOMOTIVE EMISSIONS , by Christian E.

Lindhjem, February, 2007.

Emission totals produced by ENVIRON were provided to LADCO to submit to EPA for

Ohio’s State Implementation Plan (SIP).

EPA. 1997: "Locomotive Emission Standards." Regulatory Support Document, United States

Environmental Protection Agency, O ffice of Mobile Sources, April. And EPA 1997, Emission Factors for

Locomotives," Environmental Protecti on Agency, EPA420-F-97-051, December.



## 5.3 Aircraft Sources

INTRODUCTION:

The aircraft emission’s inventory is derived by taking the number of Landings and

Take Offs (LTOs) per year and multiplying by an emission fact or. In the Ohio inventory

when specific aircraft models and engine type emission factors are known they were

used. For the rest of the inventory the emission factors came from USEPA’s fleet

average emissions data. Those results are t hen compiled as tons per year per pollutant

by county. The following de scribes the components, met hodology, and concludes with

a description of an Access based aircraft emission calculator.

COMPONENTS:

I. Ohio Airports:

A list of both towered and non-towered airpor ts in Ohio is obtained from the Ohio

Department of Transportation. See: www.dot.state.oh.us/aviation/ In conversation

with ODOT two individuals stated that the 16 4 airports listed covered over 90% of the

airports in Ohio. See Table 1.

## 45 II. Number of Operations/LTOs by Airport/County:

The ODOT list contained the number of operations a year per airport. An

operation is either a landing or a take-off. A Landing and Take Off (LTO) is required for

FAA EDMS calculations. LTOs were deriv ed simply by dividing the number of

operations by two. These were totaled by county.

Table 5-1 Number of operations and LTOs for 2005

County Airport Name ID Total Operations 

### LTOs/Year

Adams Alexander Salamon AMT 5210 

### 2605

Allen Allen County AOH 32500 

### 16250

Ashland Ashland County 3G4 49240 

### 24620

Ashtabula Ashtabula County HZY 16886 

### 8443

Ashtabula Germack 7D9 840 

### 420

Athens Ohio University UNI 51600 

### 25800

Auglaize Neil Armstrong AXV 29456 

### 14728

Belmont Barnesville-Bradfield 6G5 10150 

### 5075

Belmont Alderman 2P7 6150 

### 3075

Brown Brown County GEO 5157 

### 2578.5

Butler Butler County Regional HAO 61687 

### 30843.5

Butler Hook Field Municipal MWO 40050 

### 20025

Butler Miami University OXD 16708 

### 8354

Carroll Carroll County -Tolson TSO 34950 

### 17475

Carroll Parsons 5D6 2674 

### 1337

Champaign Grimes Field I74 23480 

### 11740

Champaign Weller 38I 300 

### 150

Clark Springfield-Beckley Municipal SGH 64033 

### 32016.5

Clark Mad River I54 15350 

### 7675

Clermont Clermont County I69 35741 

### 17870.5

Clinton Airborne Airpark ILN 52000 

### 26000

Clinton Clinton Field I66 29360 

### 14680

Clinton Hollister Field 2B6 161 

### 80.5

Columbiana Columbiana County Ø2G 31146 

### 15573

Columbiana Koons 8G8 2546 

### 1273

Coshocton Richard Downing I4Ø 19550 

### 9775

Coshocton Tri-City 8ØG 8085 

### 4042.5

Crawford Port Bucyrus 17G 24871 

### 12435.5

Crawford Galion Municipal GQQ 5216 

### 2608

Cuyahoga Burke Lakefront BKL 97100 

### 48550

Cuyahoga Cleveland-Hopkins International CLE 234356 

### 117178

Cuyahoga Cuyahoga County CGF 79774 

### 39887

Darke Darke County VES 9238 

### 4619

Defiance Defiance Memorial DFI 9130 

### 4565

Delaware Delaware Municipal DLZ 39300 

### 19650

Delaware Packer 5E9 3181 

### 1590.5

Erie Hinde 88D 1350 

### 675

Erie Kelleys Island 89D 25495 

### 12747.5

Erie Griffing-Sandusky SKY 112100 

### 56050

## 46 Erie Wakeman I64 17324 

### 8662

Fairfield Miller's Farm 7B4 360 

### 180

Fairfield Fairfield County LHQ 43066 

### 21533

Fayette Fayette County I23 29405 

### 14702.5

Franklin Ohio Stat e University OSU 134459 

### 67229.5

Franklin Port Columbus International CMH 218438 

### 109219

Franklin Rickenbacker International LCK 96200 

### 48100

Franklin Bolton Field TZR 69149 

### 34574.5

Franklin Columbus Southwest Ø4I 11833 

### 5916.5

Franklin Darby Dan 6I6 11260 

### 5630

Fulton Fulton County USE 21123 

### 10561.5

Gallia Gallia-Meigs Regional GAS 12200 

### 6100

Geauga Gates 7D8 4200 

### 2100

Geauga Geauga County 7G8 5350 

### 2675

Greene Greene County - Lewis A. Jackson I19 37400 

### 18700

Greene Bloom 14I 100 

### 50

Guernsey Cambridge Municipal CDI 6040 

### 3020

Hamilton Lunken LUK 129430 

### 64715

Hamilton Blue Ash ISZ 35000 

### 17500

Hamilton Cincinnati West I67 30197 

### 15098.5

Hancock Bluffton 5G7 71980 

### 35990

Hancock Findlay FDY 19800 

### 9900

Hancock Priebe 7D5 3850 

### 1925

Hardin Ada ØD7 331 

### 165.5

Hardin Hardin County I95 6562 

### 3281

Hardin Elliott's Landing O74 1560 

### 780

Harrison Harrison County 8G6 11900 

### 5950

Henry Henry County 7W5 15637 

### 7818.5

Highland Highland County HOC 18325 

### 9162.5

Holmes Holmes County 1ØG 21400 

### 10700

Huron Huron County 5A1 10100 

### 5050

Huron Willard 8G1 2715 

### 1357.5

Jackson James A. Rhodes I43 6053 

### 3026.5

Jefferson Jefferson County Airpark 2G2 15969 

### 7984.5

Jefferson Eddie Dew Memorial 1G8 3540 

### 1770

Knox Knox County 4I3 20150 

### 10075

Knox Wynkoop 6G4 4691 

### 2345.5

Lake Concord Airpark 2G1 4510 

### 2255

Lake Willoughby Lost Nation Municipal LNN 45085 

### 22542.5

Lawrence Lawrence County Airpark HTW 41910 

### 20955

Licking Newark-Heath VTA 12457 

### 6228.5

Logan Bellefontaine Regional EDJ 8325 

### 4162.5

Lorain Columbia 4G8 5150 

### 2575

Lorain Elyria 1G1 14300 

### 7150

Lorain Lagrange 92D 1155 

### 577.5

Lorain Lorain County Regional LPR 62000 

### 31000

Lorain Reader-Botsford Airfield 67D 18700 

### 9350

Lucas Toledo Express TOL 94600 

### 47300

## 47 Madison Madison County UYF 41410 

### 20705

Mahoning Salem Airpark 38D 16920 

### 8460

Mahoning Tri-City 3G6 10555 

### 5277.5

Mahoning Elser Metro 4G4 49232 

### 24616

Mahoning Lansdowne Ø4G 750 

### 375

Marion Marion Municipal MNN 42650 

### 21325

Medina Medina Municipal 1G5 79685 

### 39842.5

Medina Wadsworth Municipal 3G3 41025 

### 20512.5

Medina Weltzien Skypark 15G 79130 

### 39565

Mercer Lakefield CQA 16212 

### 8106

Miami Hartzell Field I17 10200 

### 5100

Miami Troy Skypark 37I 4264 

### 2132

Miami Waco Field 1WF 0 

### 0

Monroe Monroe County 4G5 3324 

### 1662

Montgomery Brookville Air-Park I62 29359 

### 14679.5

Montgomery James M. Cox Dayton Intl DAY 134524 

### 67262

Montgomery Dayton Wright Brothers MGY 89045 

### 44522.5

Montgomery Moraine Airpark I73 12938 

### 6469

Montgomery Dahio Trotwood I44 1853 

### 926.5

Montgomery Phillipsburg 3I7 68000 

### 34000

Morgan Morgan County I71 5725 

### 2862.5

Morrow Morrow County 4I9 19108 

### 9554

Muskingum Zanesville Municipal ZZV 33312 

### 16656

Muskingum Parr 42I 16150 

### 8075

Noble Noble County - Mike Brienza Field I1Ø 5950 

### 2975

Ottawa Middle Bass-East Point 3W9 1300 

### 650

Ottawa Middle Bass Island 3T7 6500 

### 3250

Ottawa North Bass Island 3X5 1000 

### 500

Ottawa Carl R. Keller Field PCW 20890 

### 10445

Ottawa Put-In-Bay 3W2 15140 

### 7570

Paulding Paulding 2H8 2100 

### 1050

Perry Crooksville I84 400 

### 200

Perry Perry County I86 4550 

### 2275

Pickaway Pickaway County CYO 35450 

### 17725

Pickaway Clarks Dream Strip Ø3I 2770 

### 1385

Pike Pike County EOP 2012 

### 1006

Portage Freedom Air Field 7D6 1623 

### 811.5

Portage Farview 86D 3353 

### 1676.5

Portage Mills 7E3 1050 

### 525

Portage Portage County 29G 9621 

### 4810.5

Putnam Ruhe's R47 13250 

### 6625

Putnam Putnam County OWX 11910 

### 5955

Putnam Ohio Dusting Co. 6C2 2995 

### 1497.5

Richland Mansfield Lahm Regional MFD 57518 

### 28759

Richland Shelby Community 12G 2012 

### 1006

Ross Ross County RZT 50150 

### 25075

Sandusky Fremont 14G 37450 

### 18725

Sandusky Sandusky County Regional S24 6148 

### 3074

## 48 Scioto Greater Portsmouth Regional PMH 45830 

### 22915

Seneca Bandit Field 5D9 140 

### 70

Seneca Fostoria Metropolitan FZI 7900 

### 3950

Seneca Weiker 82D 320 

### 160

Seneca Seneca County 16G 60165 

### 30082.5

Shelby Sidney Municipal I12 20500 

### 10250

Stark Barber 2D1 13750 

### 6875

Stark Miller Airport 4G3 8000 

### 4000

Stark Beach City 2D7 6112 

### 3056

Summit Akron Fulton International AKR 26000 

### 13000

Summit Akron-Canton Regional CAK 120441 

### 60220.5

Summit Mayfield 1D4 450 

### 225

Summit Kent State University 1G3 72500 

### 36250

Trumbull Braceville 41N 425 

### 212.5

Trumbull Warren 62D 14738 

### 7369

Trumbull Youngstown-W arren Regional YNG 98298 

### 49149

Tuscarawas Harry Clever Field PHD 54880 

### 27440

Union Union County MRT 31886 

### 15943

Van Wert Van Wert County VNW 20516 

### 10258

Vinton Vinton County 22I 5225 

### 2612.5

Warren Warren County I68 24951 

### 12475.5

Warren Red Stewart Airfield 4ØI 16800 

### 8400

Wayne Wayne County BJJ 96520 

### 48260

Williams Williams County ØG6 10010 

### 5005

Wood Wood County 1GØ 27405 

### 13702.5

Wood Bordner 3D8 2200 

### 1100

Wood Deshler Municipal 6D7 2000 

### 1000

Wood Metcalf TDZ 90700 

### 45350

Wyandot Wyandot County 56D 7410 

### 3705



## III. Aircraft Models and Number of LTO/yr:

Specific aircraft models by airport (generally t he larger airports) is obtained from “Table

7” provided by the United States Departm ent of Transportation, Office of Airline

Information. This provided the number of LTO’s for each aircraft model per year per

airport.

Table 2. Sample from “Table 7.” This is the all community total of aircraft models for

the Akron/Canton area. “All Service” departure s were used as the number of LTOs per

year for that model. Listed in the original table are airc raft model by airport and number

of services/LTOs.

## 49 **TOTAL DEPARTURES PERFORMD**

**Aircraft Scheduled Non-Sched All**

**Model Service Service Service**

A-318 1 1

A319 384 384

BOEING 717-200 3850 3850

BOEING 727-100 1 1

BOEING 727-200 5 5

BOEING 737-100/200 74 74

BOEING 737-200C 3 3 6

BOEING 737-300 2 2

BOEING 737-700/LR 212 212

BOEING 737-800 5 5

BOEING 757-200 4 4

BOEING 767-300/ER 4 4

CANADAIR RJ-100/ER 542 3 545

CANADAIR RJ-700 2881 2881

CONVAIR CV-580 3 3

DASSAULT FALCON 7 7

DHC8-100 DASH 8 2 2

DOUGLAS DC-9-15F 13 13

DOUGLAS DC-9-30 6 6

EMBRAER-145 144 144

RJ-200ER/RJ-440 5519 5519

SAAB-FAIRCHD 340/B 1804 1804

ALL TYPES 15342 130 15472

IV. Emission Factors:

Where there was specific aircraft model data the emission factors were derived

using the FAA’s Emission Dispersion Modeling System (EDMS). EDMS is a combined

emissions and dispersion model for assessing ai r quality at civilian airports and military

air bases. The model was developed by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in

cooperation with the Unit ed States Air Force (USAF). The model is used to produce an

inventory of emissions generated by source s on and around the airport or air base, and

to calculate pollutant concentrations in these environments.

## 50 Table 5-2 EDMS Aircraft Emissions

Emissions provided by Michigan Department of Environmental Quality. (The few

aircraft in Ohio not included in the table had emissions derived by EDMS 5.0 in-house.)

EDMS Aircraft Emissions/LTO by Aircraft Type

EDMS 4.5 Emissions Inventory Report of 2005 Aircraft Inventory Emissions Factors

Year 2005 Lbs Emitted Per LTO

Aircraft Type CO NOx HC VOC SO2 PM2.5 PM10

A- 318 19.8 18.7 4.0 4.4 1.5 0.0 0.0

A-300-600/R/CF/RCF 27.1 56.4 2.0 2.2 4.0 0.2 0.2

A-300B/C/F-100/200 30.2 52.5 3.5 3.7 3.3 0.2 0.2

A-310-200C/F 32.6 52.5 7.3 7.9 3.3 0.2 0.2

A-319 19.8 18.7 4.0 4.4 1.5 0.0 0.0

A320-100/200 13.7 19.8 1.3 1.3 1.8 0.2 0.2

A-321 16.8 36.8 3.1 3.3 2.2 0.0 0.0

A-330-200 29.8 61.5 0.4 0.4 4.4 0.2 0.2

AVROLINER RJ85 24.7 9.5 2.9 3.3 1.3 0.2 0.2

BAE-146-300 24.7 9.0 3.1 3.3 1.3 0.2 0.2

BEECH 1900 A/B/C 11.0 1.1 3.3 3.5 0.2 0.0 0.0

BEECH KINGAIR C90 1.8 0.9 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0

717-200 11.7 23.4 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0

727-100 21.4 23.1 4.6 5.1 2.9 0.4 0.4

727-100C/QC 44.5 19.8 4.6 5.1 2.4 1.1 1.1

727-200 19.6 27.3 2.9 3.1 3.3 1.1 1.1

737-100/200 14.1 16.1 2.2 2.4 2.0 0.7 0.7

737-200C 13.9 17.4 6.8 7.5 2.0 0.9 0.9

737-300 28.7 15.9 1.8 2.0 1.8 0.0 0.0

737-400 26.5 18.5 1.5 1.5 1.8 0.0 0.0

737-500 24.7 21.2 1.3 1.3 2.0 0.0 0.0

737-700/LR 17.6 20.1 2.0 2.0 1.8 0.4 0.4

737-800 15.7 27.1 1.5 1.8 2.0 0.7 0.7

737-900 15.7 27.1 1.5 1.8 2.0 0.7 0.7

747-100 252.6 108.5 106.7 116.8 7.1 0.4 0.4

747-200/300 60.6 104.7 7.1 7.7 6.8 0.7 0.7

747-400 67.0 105.6 5.7 6.4 7.3 0.7 0.7

757-200 24.7 35.7 2.0 2.2 2.6 0.4 0.4

757-300 27.1 33.1 0.4 0.4 3.1 0.2 0.2

767-200/ER 32.6 52.5 7.3 7.9 3.3 0.2 0.2

767-300/ER 32.0 62.2 2.6 2.9 4.0 0.4 0.4

777 32.8 85.1 5.1 5.7 4.4 0.4 0.4

CANADAIR RJ100/ER 16.3 4.9 1.5 1.8 0.7 0.0 0.0

CANADAIR RJ-700 12.6 9.3 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0

CESSNA 208 1.1 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

CONVAIR CV-580 36.2 0.9 8.8 9.5 0.7 0.0 0.0

DASSAULT FALCON 13.7 2.6 2.4 2.6 0.2 0.0 0.0

DHC8-100 DASH 8 5.1 3.1 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0

DORNIER 328 JET 1.3 6.6 11.9 12.6 0.7 0.0 0.0

DOUGLAS DC-10-10 102.5 76.7 38.6 42.1 4.2 0.0 0.0

DOUGLAS DC-10-30 45.4 78.7 5.3 5.7 5.1 0.4 0.4

## 51 DOUGLAS DC-10-40 131.8 81.8 30.2 33.1 6.0 0.7 0.7

DOUGLAS DC-8-63 263.5 25.6 219.1 239.9 4.2 5.1 5.1

DOUGLAS DC-8-71 53.6 34.6 3.1 3.3 3.7 0.0 0.0

DOUGLAS DC-8-73 53.6 34.6 3.1 3.3 3.7 0.0 0.0

DOUGLAS DC-9-10 14.1 14.6 3.7 4.0 1.8 0.2 0.2

DOUGLAS DC-9-15F 14.1 14.6 3.7 4.0 1.8 0.2 0.2

DOUGLAS DC-9-30 14.1 14.6 3.7 4.0 1.8 0.2 0.2

DOUGLAS DC-9-40 39.7 16.5 10.8 11.9 2.0 1.3 1.3

DOUGLAS DC-9-50 12.6 20.1 1.8 1.8 2.2 0.9 0.9

EMBRAER-135 12.8 5.5 1.1 1.3 0.7 0.0 0.0

EMBRAER-140 13.7 6.0 1.3 1.3 0.7 0.0 0.0

EMBRAER-145 6.4 6.8 1.1 1.1 0.7 0.0 0.0

EMBRAER-170 9.0 9.7 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0

F28-4000/6000 76.7 10.4 77.2 84.4 1.5 0.0 0.0

JETSTREAM 41 4.6 2.0 0.4 0.7 0.2 0.0 0.0

L-101101/100/200 33.3 112.0 6.2 6.8 5.7 1.3 1.3

LEAR-25 75.2 0.7 7.9 8.4 0.2 0.0 0.0

LOCKHEED L100-30 48.7 9.9 19.6 21.4 1.8 0.0 0.0

MD-11 47.8 93.3 4.0 4.4 6.0 0.7 0.7

MD-80, 1, 2, 3, 7, 8 16.3 20.3 0.0 0.0 2.2 0.2 0.2

MD-90 12.1 23.8 0.2 0.2 2.0 0.2 0.2

RJ-200ER/RJ-440 16.3 4.9 1.5 1.8 0.7 0.0 0.0

SAAB-FAIRCHD 340/B 4.2 1.5 1.5 1.5 0.2 0.0 0.0



## NOTE: Where specific aircraft model data was not available fleet emissions were used.

EPA default fleet average emissi on factors were taken from “Documentation for Aircraft,

Commercial Marine Vessel, ,Locomotive, and Other Non-road Components of the

National Emissions Inventory. 2005, s ee Appendix A, Aircraft Emission Estimation

Methodology.” Specific model LTOs were subtracted from county LTO totals to

eliminate double counting those LTOs.

Table 5-3 Fleet Emissi on Factor Categories

Fleet emission factors were br oken down into three categories. Itinerant General, Local

General, and Military.

Table 5-3a Fleet Average Emission Factor s for Itinerant General Aircraft.

(Taken from : Table A-5)

Pollutant Emission Factors (lbs/LTO)

HC 1.234

NOx 0.158

CO 28.13

SOx 0.015

PM10 0.60333

Note: Air taxi HC emissions * VOC/HC ( 0.9914) conversion factor = air taxi VOC estimate

## 52 Table 5-3b Fleet Average Emission Factor s for Local General Aircraft.

(Taken From: Table A-11)

Pollutant Emission Factors (lbs/LTO)

HC 0.394

NOx 0.065

CO 12.014

SOx 0.01

PM10 0.2367

Note: GA HC emissions * VOC/HC( 0.9708) conversion factor = GA VOC estimate

Table 5-3c Fleet Average Emission Fa ctors for Military Aircraft.

(Taken from: Table A-17)

Pollutant Emission Factors (lbs/LTO

HC 1.234

NOx 0.158

CO 28.13

SOx 0.015

PM10 0.60333

Note: Military HC emissions * VOC/HC( 1.1046) conversion factor = Military VOC estimate

METHODOLOGY

Introduction

The following information was considered in the development of emission estimates:

1. Commercial scheduled and non-scheduled ai rcraft air carrier activity and

commercial air freight activity by aircraft model types,

2. General aviation and air taxi annual loca l and itinerant operations for year 2005,

3. Military annual local and iti nerant operations for year 2005.

Due to the need to have aircraft operations in formation expressed as landing/take off

(LTO) cycles, the following assumptions were made:

1. For commercial aircraft and commercial ai r freight activity, t he number of annual

aircraft annual LTO cycles was assu med to be equal to the number of

## 53 departures. The daily LTO cycle frequency was then obtained by dividing the

yearly LTO cycles by 365.

2. For general aircraft annual local and iti nerant airport operations, each respective

operations total was divided by 2 to obt ain the corresponding year local and

itinerant LTO cycles. The expected daily local and itinerant LTO cycles then

were obtained by dividing these annual totals by 365.

3. For military annual local and itinerant operat ions, each respective operations total

was divided by 2 to obtain the correspondi ng year local and itinerant LTO cycles.

The expected military daily local and iti nerant LTO cycles then were obtained by

dividing these annual totals by 365.

Airport LTO cycles were further categoriz ed into commercial aircraft by plane and

engine type, general aviation itinerant aircraft of unknown aircraft type, general aviation

local aircraft of unknown aircraft type, and military aircraft. This was necessary in order

to utilize the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Av iation Administration EDMS

Emissions and Dispersion Modeling System . Commercial and air freight aircraft

emission factors per LTO cycle were det ermined using EDMS for each commercial

aircraft type models where possible were used at each towered airport. Default

commercial aircraft engine type, and Enviro nmental Protection Agency (EPA) default

time in mode values for takeoff, approach, and landing roll times were used in the

EDMS model simulations.

For those aircraft types that could not be determined using the EDMS emissions model,

aircraft emission factors based upon EPA alter native fleet average procedures were

then used to estimate their emissions. These included general aviation and air taxi

itinerant aircraft of unknown aircraft type, general aviation local aircraft of unknown

aircraft type, and military aircraft. Conversion from total hydrocarbons to volatile organic

compounds was performed and based upon the EPA guidance

.



## APPROACH

1. A list of more than 90% of the airports was obtained fr om the Ohio Department of

Transportation. These were classed by airport, county, aircraft flight classification, and

the total number of op erations per year.

2. The number of oper ations (a landing or a take off) were then divided by two giving

the number of LTOs per year per airport. These airports were combined by county for

the total number of LTOs per year, per county.

3. In dialog with ODOT it was determined that the following Ohio flight groups of aircraft

be combined to match the three categorie s used by the USEPA in calculating

emissions.

## 54 Itinerant (General, air carrier, commuter, ai r taxi, general aviation itinerant)

Local (General aviation local)

Military (Military)

4. LTOs for specific models of aircraft per airport were ta ken from the FAA Table 7.

See Table 2 above. These were then combined to gi ve the number of LTOs per aircraft

model per county. Specific model LTOs were subtracted from county totals to avoid

double counting those LTOs.

5. Emission factors were det ermined from the FAA’s EDMS pr ogram for specific aircraft

model and engine type. See IV. Emission factors above. The aircraft emission table

provided by Michigan has the emission factors for most of the aircraft fl own in Ohio. .

Where specific aircraft model data was not available USEPA average fleet emissions

were used.

6. Emission factors times LTOs by count y yielded tons per y ear per county.

Table 5-4 Pollutant by County (Sample)

County POLLUTANT ACTIVITY(LTOS/YEAR) ACTIVITY(LTOS/DAY) EMISSIONS(TON/YEAR)

ADAMS CO 2605 7.136986 24.552325

ADAMS HC 2605 7.136986 0.977285

ADAMS NOX 2605 7.136986 0.136045

ADAMS PM10-PRI 2605 7.136986 0.513114825

ADAMS PM25-PRI 2605 7.136986 0

ADAMS SOX 2605 7.136986 0.0157875

ADAMS VOC 2605 7.136986 0.96314234

ALLEN CO 16250 44.52055 147.945065

ALLEN HC 16250 44.52055 5.841097

ALLEN NOX 16250 44.52055 0.827189

ALLEN PM10-PRI 16250 44.52055 3.081191265

ALLEN PM25-PRI 16250 44.52055 0

ALLEN SOX 16250 44.52055 0.0984575

ALLEN VOC 16250 44.52055 5.769568254

ASHLAND CO 24620 67.45205 173.67794

ASHLAND HC 24620 67.45205 6.19414

ASHLAND NOX 24620 67.45205 0.94895

ASHLAND PM10-PRI 24620 67.45205 3.532515

ASHLAND PM25-PRI 24620 67.45205 0

ASHLAND SOX 24620 67.45205 0.1311

ASHLAND VOC 24620 67.45205 6.07175247

ASHTABULA CO 8863 24.28219 78.115087

ASHTABULA HC 8863 24.28219 3.042551

ASHTABULA NOX 8863 24.28219 0.431593

## 55 ASHTABULA PM10-PRI 8863 24.28219 1.623493455

ASHTABULA PM25-PRI 8863 24.28219 0

ASHTABULA SOX 8863 24.28219 0.0520325

ASHTABULA VOC 8863 24.28219 2.99420213

ATHENS CO 25800 70.68493 196.874985

ATHENS HC 25800 70.68493 7.267183

ATHENS NOX 25800 70.68493 1.081521

ATHENS PM10-PRI 25800 70.68493 4.037266335

ATHENS PM25-PRI 25800 70.68493 0

ATHENS SOX 25800 70.68493 0.1420925

ATHENS VOC 25800 70.68493 7.128180006



## 7. Emissions were then summed by pollut ants in each county by SCC aircraft category

type so data could be provided to LADCO in the EPA prescribed NEI – NIF format.

DATA ERROR

The first aircraft emission inventory submitt ed to LADCO in April, 2007 contained an

error. The inventory submitted in May, 2007 has the error corrected. The error was the

result of a carry-over func tion in Access that picked up the number of operations as

instead of LTOs....which made the in ventory exactly twice as lar ge as what it really was.

ACCESS CALCULATOR

Introduction:

Our database programmer set up Access applic ation to calculate Ohio’s aircraft

emission inventory, and export those results to Excel. His utility allows for easy

modification of the aircraft data to match futu re data scenarios. Ou tput to Excel also

allows for additional data manipulation and importation.

## 56 Interface:

Through this interface the following sets of data can be edited/updated: Airport activity,

emission factors, specific airport emissi ons, state/county FIPS, detailed aircraft

information, airport informati on, and aircraft SCCs. Once the final emissions have been

calculated and summed, then the data can be expo rt via the export function on the Main

Menu

.

# Appendix C

## This page left intentionally blank

# B ROOKE



# - H ANCOCK



# - J EFFERSON



# T RANSPORTATION 

# S TUDY

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM 201 1

- 1

Transportation Air Quality Analysis a nd Technical Documentation

For the Weirton

- Steubenville , WV

- OH

State Implementation Plan Inventory Mobile Emission Estimates

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM 2.5 

# National Ambient Air Quality Standard

Submitted: May 2011

Revised: February 2012

## Production of t his Document paid for by funds from the U.S. Federal Highway Administration, Federal

Transit Administration, Ohio Department of Transportation, West Virginia Department of Transportation

and dues from BHJ member governments.

Prepared By:

Brooke

- Hancock

- Jefferson Metropolitan Planning Commission

Th e Metropolitan Planning Organization for

Steubenville, Ohio

- Weirton, WV Area

124 North Fourth Street, 2 nd 

## Floor

Steubenville, OH 43952

740/282

- 3685

304/797

- 9666

740/282

- 1821 FAX

Email: mikepap@bhjmpc.org Website: www.bhjmpc.org

### Transp ortation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton

- Steubenville

, WV

- OH

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM 2.5 

### National Ambient Air Quality Standard

May 2011 ; Revised February 2012 Page i



## BROOKE

- HANCOCK

- JEFFERSON TRANSPORTATION STUDY

Transportation Air Quality Analysis and Technical Documentation

For the Weirton

- Steubenville, WV

- OH

State Implementation Plan Inventory M obile Emission Estimates

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM 2.5 

## National Ambient Air Quality Standard

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ..... Page 1

On Road Mobile Emission Summary

................................ ................................ ............................. Page 3

Latest Planning Assumptions

................................ ................................ ................................ .......... Page 5

Travel Demand Modeling

- Analysis Years

................................ ................................ ................... Page 5

Social

- Economic Demographics

................................ ................................ ................................ ..... Page 5

Emission Factor Generation

................................ ................................ ................................ ............ Page 9

Temperature and Relative Humidity

................................ ................................ ............................... Page 11

Ramp Fraction

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ . Page 12

Source Type Population

................................ ................................ ................................ .................. Page 12

Vehicle Age Distribution

................................ ................................ ................................ ................ Page 12

Road Type Distribution

................................ ................................ ................................ ................... Page 21

Post Process ing

................................ ................................ ................................ ............................... Page 22

Appendix A

– Interagency Consultation Documentation

### Transp ortation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton

- Steubenville

, WV

- OH

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM 2.5 

### National Ambient Air Quality Standard

May 2011 ; Revised February 2012 Page ii 

## LIST OF TABLES

Table 1 BHJ Region On

- Road Mobile Emissions by State

................................ ................. Page 3

Table 2 BHJ Region On

- Road Mobile Emissions by County

................................ ............. Page 4

Table 3 BHJ Region Representative Social

- Economic Demographic Variables

By County 2005

- 2020

................................ ................................ ............................. Page 7

Table 4 Moves Inputs

................................ ................................ ................................ ........... Page 9

Table 5 Average Temperature and Relative Humidity Data

................................ ................ Page 11

Table 6 Ramp Fractions

................................ ................................ ................................ ....... Page 11

Table 7 Source Type Population for Year 2005

................................ ................................ .. Page 12

Table 8 Vehicle Age Distribution for Jefferson County, OH

................................ .............. P age 13

Table 9 Vehicle Age Distribution for Brooke/Hancock County, WV

................................ . Page 17

Table 10 Road Type Distribution for Brooke

- Hancock

- Jefferson Non

- Attainment Area

..... Page 21

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1 BHJ Geographic Area Fine Particulate Matter Non

- Attainment A rea Boundary

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ . Page 2

Figure 2 BHJ Geographi c Area Covered by Travel Demand Model and Traffic Analysis Zone

Structure

................................ ................................ ................................ .................. Page 8

### Transp ortation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton

- Steubenville

, WV

- OH

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM 2.5 

### National Ambient Air Quality Standard

May 2011 ; Revised February 2012 Page iii



# SELECTED ABBREVIATIONS & ACRONYMS

BHJ

– B rooke

- Hancock

- Jefferson Metropolitan

Planning Commission

CFR

– Code of Federal Regulations

FHWA

– F ederal Highway Administration ;

FTA

– F ederal Transit Admi nistration ;

LRTP

– Long Range Transportation Plan

MOBILE6

– Mobile Source Emission Factor

Model

MOU

– Memorandum of Understanding

MPO

– Metropolitan Planning Organization

MVEB

– Motor Vehicle Emissions Budget

NAAQS

– National Ambient Air Quality

Standard

NO X



## – Nitrogen Oxides

ODOT

– Ohio Department of Transportation

OEPA

– Ohio Environmental Protection

Agency

PM

– Particulate Matter

PM 2.5 

## - Particulate Matter with an aerodynamic

diameter less than 2.5 microns (often referred to

as Fine Partic ulate Matter) PM 10



## – Particulate Matter with an aerodynamic

diameter less than 10 microns

SIP

– State Implementation Plan

STIP

– Statewide Transportation Improvement

Program

TAZs

– Traffic Analysis Zones

TCM

– Transportation Control Measure

TDM

– Travel Demand Model

TIP

– Transportation Improvement Program in a

Metropolitan Planning Area

USEPA

– United States Environmental

Protection Agency

VMT

– Vehicle Miles of Travel

VOC

– Volatile Organic Compounds

WVDEP

– West Virginia Department of

Envir onmental Protection

WVDOT

– West Virginia Department of

Transportation

## REVISION HISTORY

February 24, 2012

Edit Page 1 ; Introduction; Paragraph #1 Revise paragraph into two sentences.

Edit P a ge 3 ; On Road Emission Summary Paragraph #1 ; Insert Maintenance Year 2022 with 2025

Revise ; Table 1; BHJ Region on

- Road Mobile Emissions b y State ; Add Maintenance Year 2025

Revise Pag e 4 ; Table 2 ; BHJ Region on

- Road Mobile Emissions b y County ; Add Maintenance Year

2025

Revise Page 5 ; Travel Demand Modeling

- Analysis Years ; Add Analysis Year 2025

– Maintenance

Year

Revise Page 9; Emission Factor Generation ; Paragraph #1 Add 2025

### Transp ortation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton

- Steubenville

, WV

- OH

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM 2.5 

### National Ambient Air Quality Standard

May 2011 ; Revised February 2012 Page 1 

# Transportation Air Quality Analysis a nd Technical Documentation

For the Weirton

- Steubenville, WV

- OH

State Implementation Plan Inventory Mobile Emission Estimates

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM 2.5 

# National Ambient Air Quality Standard

INTRODUCTION

This memorandum document s the air quality analyses and underlying planning assumptions performed

for the Annual PM2.5 on

- road mobile source emission inv entories for the Weirton

- Steubenville, WV

OH Metropolitan area State Implementation Plan (SIP) . T he Ohio Department of Transportation

(ODOT), Division of Transportation System Development

- Modeling and Forecasting Section and the

Brooke

- Hancock

- Jefferson Planning Commission (BHJM PC) completed these analyses in coordination

with the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (OEPA) and West Virginia Department of

Environmental Protection (WVDEP)

.

The BHJ Region is compr ised of the counties of Brooke and Hancock in the north panhandle of West

Virginia and Jefferson in east

- central Ohio. On January 5, 2005, the USEPA designated all three

counties within the BHJMPO Planning Area as non

- attainment for the PM 2.5 

## air quality standard. The

designation became effective on April 5, 2005; 90 days after USEPA published action in the Federal

Registry

. Figure 1 displays the geographic extent of the Steubenville

- Weirton, OH

- WV non

- attainment

area

The BHJMPC serves as t he Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) . The MPO submitted the

necessary Travel Demand Model networks along with all land use and social

- economic demographics.

The ODOT Modeling and Forecasting section performed the MOVES runs to generate travel dema nd

model based emission factors as well as the complete air quality analyses for t he metropolitan area

.

### Transp ortation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton

- Steubenville

, WV

- OH

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM 2.5 

### National Ambient Air Quality Standard

May 2011 ; Revised February 2012 Page 2 

## Figure 1

BHJ GEOGRAPHIC AREA

FINE PARTICULATE MATTER

NON

- ATTAINMENT AREA BOUNDARY

### Transp ortation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton

- Steubenville

, WV

- OH

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM 2.5 

### National Ambient Air Quality Standard

May 2011 ; Revised February 2012 Page 3 

## ON ROAD MOBILE EMISSION SUMMARY

The Table 1 and 2 below present a summary of the pollutant emissions including Fine Particulate Matter

( PM 2.5 

## ) , Nitrogen Oxides (NO

x 

## ), Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2 

## ) modeled for each county that make up the BHJ

Region . The Model Years for the demonstration includes the Base Year 20 05, Attainment Year 2008 (a

leap year)

, Interim Year 2015 , and Maintenance Year 202 5

.

Table 1

BHJ REGION ON

- ROAD MOBILE EMISSIONS BY STATE

### Transp ortation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton

- Steubenville

, WV

- OH

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM 2.5 

### National Ambient Air Quality Standard

May 2011 ; Revised February 2012 Page 4 

## Table 2

BHJ REGION O N

- ROAD MOBILE EMISSIONS BY COUNTY

### Transp ortation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton

- Steubenville

, WV

- OH

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM 2.5 

### National Ambient Air Quality Standard

May 2011 ; Revised February 2012 Page 5 

## LATEST PLANNING ASSUMPTIONS

The annual PM2.5 inventory runs meet the latest planning assumption requirement. This report will

present the latest population and land use data available that calibrated the modeling process used to

calculate the vehicle emissions for the mobile emissions budgets as well as the input values for U.S.

EPA’s most recent emissions software MOVES for this attainment demonstration.

A series of conference calls held in November 2010 and February 2011 by the Interagency Consultancy

Group established two parameters. First, that this re

- designation effort will require the use of U.S.

EPA’s most recent emissions software MOVES for all mobile source emission analyses and second, the

annual emi ssion estimates will be based a single

- season app roach . The group also decided that s ince

travel demand models produce average daily conditions, the daily emissions estimates are multiplied by

365 days to produce annual emissions estimates expressed in tons per year.

TRAVEL DEMAND MODELING

- ANALYSIS YEARS

A Travel Demand Model (TDM) is the traditional forecasting tool used to examine potential changes in

future travel patterns for a specific study area, in this case the Brooke

- Hancock

- Jefferson Metropolitan

Area. The BHJ MPO, with the assistance of ODOT Modeling & Forecasting, maintains a validated

region

- wide TDM that employs a four

- step modeling process consisting of trip generation, trip

distribution, mode choice, and route assignment performed with the Cube Voyager software package

. The model Ou tputs generated from the TDM are link

- by

- link directional 24

- hour traffic volumes for

simulating Base Year and Horizon Year travel patterns generated by the LRTP transportation network.

The current BHJ TDM Validation Year is 2000. The model uses compar able Average Daily Traffic

count data, updated social

- economic variables for each of the analysis years by either updating existing

or known land use commitment for 2008, 2009, and 2014, or projected 2014 and 2020 variables based

on a straight

- line extrapo lation between 2009 set of variables and the Horizon Year 2030 variables.

These networks represent all planned federal

- aid projects as well as any regionally significant projects

found in the BHJ TIP and LRTP expected to be open for traffic by the end of e ach respective analysis

year.

T he interagency consultation process, as previously discussed, established the following model years for

Brooke and Hancock counties , WV and Jefferson County, OH that reflected the most recent

correspondence from the U.S. EPA :

Analysis Year 2005

– Baseline Emissions

Analysis Year 20 08

– Attainment Year

Analysis Year 2015

– Interim Year

Analysis Year 2022

– Maintenance Year

Analysis Year 2025

– Maintenance Year

SOCIAL

- ECONOMIC DEMOGRAPHICS

Identifying projected growth centers and understanding urban and rural population changes are essential

to determine future transportation needs in a given study area. Critical elements include an

understanding of the past and anticipated future shifts in the region’s economy, population, land use

### Transp ortation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton

- Steubenville

, WV

- OH

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM 2.5 

### National Ambient Air Quality Standard

May 2011 ; Revised February 2012 Page 6 

## patterns, and other environmental factors over time. In turn, these factors are useful for predicting future

transportation patterns and justify transportation improvements over the next twenty years.

Travel fo recasting procedures require the user delineate the TDM study area into geographic areas called

Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs). Typically, TAZs are based on factors such as land use, area types

(urban, suburban or rural), or political government units such as cities, villages, or townships. TAZs

represent centers of travel generators or attractors based on a set of demographic variables. The

BHJMPO collects and reviews the TDM independent variables that characterize current and future

estimates of the met ropolitan area’s social and economic activity that may influence land

- use

development patterns. In all, there are 376 TAZs in the BHJ model represented by 60 TAZs for Brooke

County, 78 TAZs for Hancock County, and 237 TAZs for Jefferson County. Figure 2 displays the BHJ

MPO geography covered by the Steubenville

- Weirton Travel Demand Model (the entire three

- county

area) including the Traffic Analysis Zone structure. The computer

- based TDM for the Steubenville

Weirton Metropolitan Area highway network empl oys the following land use variables:

[ AREA_TYPE ] ≡ Area Type

[ AVG_PARK ] ≡ Average parking cost

[ ENROLL ] ≡ School en rollment classified by Private [ENROLL_PRIV], Public

[ENROLL_PUB] and Post

- secondary [ENROLL_UNIV] schools

[ HOTEL_RM ] ≡ Hotel Rooms

[ MED_HHINC ] ≡ Median household income

[ POP ] ≡ Population

[ POP_18 ] ≡ Population 18 years or less

[ POP_GRP ] ≡ Population residing in Group Quarters

[ TOTEMP ] ≡ Total Employment grouped by the North American Industrial Classification

System (NAICS)

[ TOT_HH ] ≡ O ccupied housing

[ TOT_VEH ] ≡ Vehicles available per household

[ WORKERS ] ≡ Workers per household

Table 3 is a set of demographic variables developed for the most recent 2006 24

- Hour PM2.5 National

Ambient Air Quality Standard for the Weirton

- Steubenville, W V

- OH non

- attainment area compiled

September 2010.

### Transp ortation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton

- Steubenville

, WV

- OH

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM 2.5 

### National Ambient Air Quality Standard

May 2011 ; Revised February 2012 Page 7 

## Table 3

BHJ REGION

REPRESENTATIVE SOCIAL

- ECONOMIC DEMOGRAPHIC

VARIABLES BY COUNTY 2005

- 2020

### Transp ortation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton

- Steubenville

, WV

- OH

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM 2.5 

### National Ambient Air Quality Standard

May 2011 ; Revised February 2012 Page 8 

## Figure 2

BHJ GEOGRAPHIC AREA

COVERED BY TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL

AND TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ZONE STRUCTURE

### Transp ortation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton

- Steubenville

, WV

- OH

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM 2.5 

### National Ambient Air Quality Standard

May 2011 ; Revised February 2012 Page 9 

## EMISSION FACTOR GENERATION

The MOVES model generated the emission factor files were for base year

- 2 005 and attainment year

2008 represent ing the transportation improvement programs implemented in the BHJ Region. The

model also generated emission factors for two future year scenarios 2015

, 2022 , and 2025

.

Table 4 summarizes the settings used in the MOVES run specification file and the MOVES County

Data Manager. The subsequent tables provide the specific inputs that a re not using the MOVES default

values

.

Table 4

MOVES INPUTS

### Transp ortation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton

- Steubenville

, WV

- OH

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM 2.5 

### National Ambient Air Quality Standard

May 2011 ; Revised February 2012 Page 10 

## Table 4 (continued)

MOVES INPUTS

TEMPERATURE AND RELATIVE HUMIDITY

The single season approach for temperature and relative humidity uses weather data collected by the

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Climatic Data Center (NCDC)

. The data used in this report

, taken from the Pittsburgh International Airport collection center, is

rep resentative of 12 months in 2009

. Data entered into a spreadsheet provided by U.S. EPA convert ed

the Mobile6 to get the correct data for the MOVES model

. Listed in the table below are the average

annual hourly temperature s and relative humidity distribution profile s for the Weir ton

- Steubenville,

WV

- OH metropolitan area

.

### Transp ortation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton

- Steubenville

, WV

- OH

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM 2.5 

### National Ambient Air Quality Standard

May 2011 ; Revised February 2012 Page 11 

## Table 5

AVERAGE TEMPERATURE AND RELATIVE HUMIDITY DATA

RAMP FRACTIO N

The Base Year Travel Demand Model used the V ehicles H our of T ravel (VHT) fractions to derive the

Ramp F ractions shown in Table 6

. The future year networks also used the b ase year fractions

.

Table 6

RAMP FRACTIONS

### Transp ortation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton

- Steubenville

, WV

- OH

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM 2.5 

### National Ambient Air Quality Standard

May 2011 ; Revised February 2012 Page 12 

## SOURCE TYPE POPULATION

A combination of local and MOVES default data is the Source Type P opulation for vehicle

classifications

. The MOVES default values provided the data for Source Type Population 51, 52, 53,

61, and 62 while local data from Ohio and West Virginia motor vehicle registration s accounted for all

other Source Type Population needed to run the MOVES m odel. Table 7 shows the Source Type

Population identifications, the corresponding Source Type Name, and the number of vehicles analyzed

for Jefferson County, OH and Brooke/Hancock County, WV combined

.

Table 7

SOURCE TYPE POPULATION FOR YEAR 2005

VEHICLE AGE DISTRIBUTION

A grouping of data from Ohio and West Virginia sources along with the MOVES model default s make

up the Vehicle Age Distribution. MOVES default values included Vehicle Type ID 41, 42, 51, 52, 53,

61, and 62. Local data from Ohio and West Virginia motor vehicle registration s accounted for all other

Vehicle Type ID. Table 8 and Table 9 show th e Vehicle Age Distribution for Jefferson County, OH and

Brooke/Hancock County, WV respectively

.

### Transp ortation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton

- Steubenville

, WV

- OH

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM 2.5 

### National Ambient Air Quality Standard

May 2011 ; Revised February 2012 Page 13 

## Table 8

VEHICLE AGE DISTRIBUTION FOR JEFFERSON COUNTY, OH

### Transp ortation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton

- Steubenville

, WV

- OH

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM 2.5 

### National Ambient Air Quality Standard

May 2011 ; Revised February 2012 Page 14 

## Table 8 (continued)

VEHICLE AGE DISTRIBUTION FOR JEFFERSON COUNTY, OH

### Transp ortation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton

- Steubenville

, WV

- OH

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM 2.5 

### National Ambient Air Quality Standard

May 2011 ; Revised February 2012 Page 15 

## Table 8 (continued)

VEHICLE AGE DISTRIBUTION FOR JEFFERSON COUNTY, OH

### Transp ortation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton

- Steubenville

, WV

- OH

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM 2.5 

### National Ambient Air Quality Standard

May 2011 ; Revised February 2012 Page 16 

## Table 8 (continued)

VEHICLE AGE DISTRIBUTION FOR JEFFERSON COUNTY, OH

### Transp ortation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton

- Steubenville

, WV

- OH

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM 2.5 

### National Ambient Air Quality Standard

May 2011 ; Revised February 2012 Page 17 

## Table 9

VEHICLE AGE DISTRIB UTION FOR BROOKE/HANCOCK COUNTY, WV

### Transp ortation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton

- Steubenville

, WV

- OH

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM 2.5 

### National Ambient Air Quality Standard

May 2011 ; Revised February 2012 Page 18 

## Table 9 (continued)

VEHICLE AGE DISTRIBUTION FOR BROOKE/HANCOCK COUNTY, WV

### Transp ortation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton

- Steubenville

, WV

- OH

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM 2.5 

### National Ambient Air Quality Standard

May 2011 ; Revised February 2012 Page 19 

## Table 9 (continued)

VEHICLE AGE DISTRIBUTION FOR BROOKE/HANCOCK COUNTY, WV

### Transp ortation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton

- Steubenville

, WV

- OH

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM 2.5 

### National Ambient Air Quality Standard

May 2011 ; Revised February 2012 Page 20 

## Table 9 (continued)

VEHICLE AGE DISTRIBUTION FOR BROOKE/HANCOCK COUNTY, WV

### Transp ortation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton

- Steubenville

, WV

- OH

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM 2.5 

### National Ambient Air Quality Standard

May 2011 ; Revised February 2012 Page 21 

## ROAD TYPE DISTRIBUTION

The ODOT and WV Division of Highway county summary V ehicle Miles Traveled (V MT ) data

categorized by federal functional class for the three county non

- attainment areas is the basis for Road

Type Di stribution Fraction

. Table 10 illustrates Road Type Distribution

.

Table 10

ROAD TYPE DISTRIBUTION FOR BROOKE

- HANCOCK

- JEFFERSON

NON

- ATTAIN MENT AREA

### Transp ortation Air Quality Analysis And Technical Documentation Weirton

- Steubenville

, WV

- OH

For the U.S. EPA 1997 Annual PM 2.5 

### National Ambient Air Quality Standard

May 2011 ; Revised February 2012 Page 22 

## POST PROCESSING

Several custom programs created by ODOT were computed the t otal emissions. The process uses data

on daily and directional traffic distributions as well as more up to date volume/delay functions from the

2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). This process, described below and illustrated in Figure 4, also

uses rewri tten code able to handle the newer model network formats and MOVES generated emission

factors.

The first step in the process involves running postcms.exe to calculate hourly link volumes based on the

percentage of the daily volume (travel demand model output) determined by a link’s facility and area

type. The analysis does not use the l ink speeds from the travel demand model. Using a link’s volume

to

- capacity ratio and link group code

, a post

- process to the model based on HCM methods estimates the

li nk speeds

.

The second step (mmoves.exe) uses a combination of the MOVES emission factors and the hourly link

volumes that are output of the postcms.exe p rogram. The hourly volumes multiplied by the MOVES

emission factor for the corresponding hour of d ay, speed bin, and road type ; calculate emissions for

every network link for each hour. The final link on road vehicle emissions for the area is the sum of all

individual link

- hour emissions.

The third step, (vehcalm.exe), calculates vehicle

- based emis sions for each source type for each hour of

the day. A combination of local and default data is the source for the vehicle source type . The final

vehicle emissions for each county are the sum of all individual hourly emissions for all vehicle types.

Since the intrazonal trips are not loaded onto the network, the fourth step in the process requires a

separate method to account for those trips that use local roads to travel within a zone. The intracalm.exe

program uses intrazonal trips to estimate VMT using the area in square miles and intrazonal trips of each

zone. The computer program assumes that the zone is circular and uses the radius of the circle as the

average trip length for these intrazonal trips. By combining MOVES generated emissions with

estimated intrazonal VMT , the i ntrazonal emissions are then calculated. The emission rates are the same

as those used to calculated link based emissions.

The final step is to summarize link, vehicle, and intrazonal emissions for each county, pollutant, and

analyzed year, and to multiply annual average daily emissions by 365 to produce an annual estimate.

# APPENDIX A

INTERAGENCY CONSULTATION DOCUMENTATION

# Appendix D

## This page left intentionally blank

### 1



## Regional Air Quality Analyses for Ozone, PM2.5, and Regional Haze:

Final Technical Support Document ( Supplement ), September 12, 2008

The purpose of this paper is to summarize a new modeling analysis performed by the Lake

Michigan Air Dir ectors Consorti um (LADCO) to address the effect of the recent court decision

vacat ing EPA’s Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR). This new modeling is intended to supplem ent

the LADCO Technical Support Document (“ Regional Air Quality Analyses for Ozone, PM2.5,

and Regional Haze: Final Technical Support Document”, April 25, 2008) , which summarizes the

air quality analyses conducted by LADCO and its contractors to support the development of

State Implementation Plans for ozone, PM2.5, and regional haze in the States of Illinoi s, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin

.

Compared to the previous LADCO modeling (Round 5.1), the new modeling shows similar

results for ozone, but much more nonattainment for PM2.5 and higher visibility levels for

regional haze. Specifically, the new modeling shows:

Ozone : Attainment of the 0.08 ppm standard by 2009 everywhere in the region, except

Holland, MI , and n onattainment of the 0.075 ppm standard through at least 2018.

PM2.5 : Widespread nonattainment of annual (15 ug/m 3 

### ) and daily (35 ug/m 3 

### ) standards.

Haze : Higher visibility levels on the 20% worst visibility days in 2018 in Class I areas in

the eastern U.S., resulting in most areas being above the glide path.

Background : On July 11, 2008, the U.S. Court of Appeals for D.C. Circuit v acated EPA’s CAIR

rule (cite). The reductions in NOx and SO2 emissions associated with this rule were a key part

of the LADCO States’ attainment demonstrations for ozone and PM2.5 and the reasonable

progress determinations for regional haze . LADCO’s prev ious modeling (Round 5.1) relied on

EGU emission projections from EPA’s IPM3.0 analysis, which assumed implementation of

Phases I and II of CAIR. For this new modeling, alternative EGU emission projections were

developed , which did not rely on CAIR (or IP M).

Model Set

- Up : The new modeling was performed consistent with LADCO’s previous modeling

(Round 5.1):

Model Version: CAMx v4.50beta_deposition

Future Years: 2009, 2012, 2018

Runs: (a) Ozone : Summer 2005 meteorology with 12 km grids

(b) PM2.5 an d haze : F ull year 2005 meteorology with 36 km grids



### Emission Scenarios: The new modeling assumed the same set of “on the books” controls as

in LADCO’s previous modeling (Round 5.1) for all sectors, except EGUs. In light of the CAIR

decision, three new E GU scenarios were prepared:

### 2

Scenario A: 2007 CEM

- based emissions w ere projected for all states in the modeling domain

based on EIA growth rates by state (NERC region) and fuel type. The assumed growth rates for

the Midwest States were: MAIN (IL, IA, MO, WI): 8.8% (2007

- 2018); ECAR (IN, KY, MI, OH):

13.5% (2007

- 2018); and MAPP (MN): 15.1% (2007

- 2018). No control w as applied. The annual

emissions w ere temporalized based on profiles derived from 2004

- 2006 CEM data. (Note, these

are the same temporal prof iles used in R ound 5.1 .)

Scenario B. Scenario A emissions for the LADCO States and select neighboring states (e.g.,

MN, IA, MO, KY, TN, and WV) w ere adjusted by applying legally enforceable controls (i.e.,

emission reductions required by a Consent Decree , state rule, or permit). Only those legally

enforceable controls identified (and justified) by the States w ere applied. The States also

supplied the appropriate control factors. A table summarizing the Scenario B con trols is provided

in Appendix I.

Sc enario C. For the years 2009 and 2012, Scenario A emissions for all states w ere adjusted by

applying all planned SO2 and NOx controls based on the July 10 CAMD list (i.e., 9 0 % reduction

for scrubbers, 9 5 % reduction for SCRs). Because the July 10 CAMD list only includes controls

generally out to 2011, additional SO2 and NOx controls for the year 2018 w ere assumed for all

BART

- eligible EGUs in the five LADCO State plus MN, IA, MO, KY, TN, and MO list (i.e., 9 0 %

reduction for scrubbers, 9 5 % reduction for SCRs )

. 1 

### A ll Scenario B controls we re included in

Scenario C. A table summarizing the Scenario C controls is provided in Appendix II.



### Table 1 and Figure 1 provide a summary of the 5

- state regional NOx and SO2 emissions for

each scenario and future year. (No te, the CAIR emissions included here are based on EPA’s

IPM3.0 modeling.) Several comments on the emissions should be noted:

Summer NOx

• There is ll ittle difference between the three alternative scenarios and CAIR . T his

suggests that summer ozone concen trations for the alternative scenarios are

likely to be similar to those predicted with CAIR (i.e., Round 5.1).

Annual NOx:

• There is a s ignificant change in emissions between scenarios , mostly during the

non

- summer months.

• Scenario B reflects application of NOx controls in several states (e.g., IL,OH, WI).

• Because there are relatively few SCRs (in the LADCO States) on the CAMD list,

Scenario C results in only a small emissions decrease compared to Scenario B

.

• Assumed BART controls result in a significant em issions decrease.

Annual SO2

• There is a s ignificant change in emissions between scenarios

.

• Scenario B reflects application of SO2 controls in several states (e.g., I L,OH, WI).

• Because there are several FGD s (in the LADCO States) on the CAMD list,

Scenario C results in a large emissions decrease compared to Scenario B

.

• Assumed BART controls result in a significant emissions decrease (i.e., even

lower emissions than t he IPM

- estimated CAIR emissions).

1 

### A subsequent analysis was conducted with the following inventory changes: (a) 95% reduction for

scrubbers, 90% redcuction for SCRs (consistent with EPA’s default assumptions for IPM), and (b)

revisions provided for a few plants in Indiana and Minnesota. The changes resulted in a relatively small

difference in the regioinal NOx and SO2 emissions (e.g., about a 2% NOx increase and about a 1

- 2%

decrease in SO2). To assess the impact of the chan ges, PM2.5 modleing was conducted with the new

Scenario B and Scenario C emissions for 2012. The modeling showed little change in the predicted

PM2.5 concentrations.

### 3 

### Figure 1. Regional NOx and SO2 Emissions

Summe r NO x Emi ss ions

0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000

2005 2007 200

9A 200 9B 200 9C

200 9 C AIR 201 2A 201 2B 201 2C

201 2 C AIR 201 8A 201 8B 201 8C

201 8BART

201 8 C AIR



### Annu al NO x Emi ss ions

0 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000

2005 2007 200

9A 200 9B 200 9C

200 9 C AIR 201 2A 201 2B 201 2C

201 2 C AIR 201 8A 201 8B 201 8C

201 8BART

201 8 C AIR



### Annu al SO2 Emi ss ions

0 500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 3,000,000

2005 2007 200

9A 200 9B 200 9C

200 9 C AIR 201 2A 201 2B 201 2C

201 2 C AIR 201 8A 201 8B 201 8C

201 8BART

201 8 C AIR

### 4 

### Table 1. Regional NOx and SO2 Emissions



# Summer NOx Emissions (TPD)

2005 2007 2009 A 2009 B 2009 C 2010

CAIR 2012 A 2012 B 2012 C 2012

CAIR 2018 A 2018 B 2018 C 2018 C

BART 2018

CAIR

IL 305 305 311 311 311 275 340 236 236 266 333 227 227 219 224

I N 393 393 376 376 374 384 393 393 390 368 410 386 383 292 264

MI 393 393 350 350 350 242 366 366 366 229 377 377 377 260 243

OH 408 408 395 355 335 285 423 351 351 290 431 366 366 230 290

WI 413 413 167 160 160 238 184 170 170 177 183 168 168 168 17 7

1,912 1,912 1,599 1,552 1,530 1,424 1,706 1,516 1,513 1,330 1,734 1,524 1,521 1,169 1,198



# Annual NOx Emissions (TPY)

2005 2007 2009 A 2009 B 2009 C 2010

CAIR 2012 A 2012 B 2012 C 2012

CAIR 2018 A 2018 B 2018 C 2018 C

BART 2018

CAIR

IL 126,786 121,006 124,917 124,917 124,917 83,224 137,438 81,989 81,989 82,248 135,983 79,771 79,771 63,590 69,958

IN 214,727 203,493 203,776 203,776 201,947 133,188 212,790 212,790 210,877 125,541 221,950 212,805 210,81 0 177,027 90,415

MI 120,332 112,484 112,478 112,478 112,478 83,117 117,621 117,621 117,621 77,897 122,447 122,447 122,447 89,444 79,543

OH 255,554 240,351 240,016 173,071 164,911 94,346 251,065 172,514 172,514 97,679 261,644 179,737 179,737 125,762 95, 678

WI 71,414 54,582 56,540 54,065 54,065 53,032 62,266 57,759 57,759 56,480 61,812 56,952 56,952 56,952 56,158

788,812 731,917 737,727 668,307 658,317 446,908 781,179 642,673 640,760 439,845 803,837 651,712 649,717 512,774 391,752



# Annual SO2 Emissions (TPY)

2005 2007 2009 A 2009 B 2009 C 2010

CAIR 2012 A 2012 B 2012 C 2012

CAIR 2018 A 2018 B 2018 C 2018 C

BART 2018

CAIR

IL 326,598 273,467 281,028 281,028 281,028 295,516 309,209 196,238 194,746 267,1 10 305,364 106,638 105,152 82,351 275,716

IN 866,964 722,301 721,252 721,252 619,486 374,335 754,323 754,323 558,567 379,144 786,551 764,065 559,945 426,695 359,915

MI 350,694 343,487 343,140 343,140 315,326 227,296 358,879 358,879 301,062 233,204 373, 964 373,964 313,677 178,680 242,853

OH 1,100,510 960,820 959,466 959,466 693,438 427,145 1,003,633 897,099 572,807 370,532 1,045,945 819,770 481,623 333,740 315,560

WI 181,426 137,562 142,007 142,007 133,738 139,181 156,659 144,818 133,592 139,203 155, 818 144,027 132,849 77,214 127,073

2,826,192 2,437,638 2,446,892 2,446,892 2,043,017 1,463,473 2,582,703 2,351,356 1,760,775 1,389,192 2,667,641 2,208,463 1,593,245 1,098,679 1,321,116

### 5



### Modeling Results: Several tables summarizing the modeling result s are provided:

Table 2

- future year ozone and PM2.5 concentrations for key monitors in the

LADCO region

Table 3

- number of monitoring sites greater than the National Ambient Air Quality

Standards (NNAQS)

Table 4

–

visibility levels fo r Class I areas in the eastern U.S.

Note, given that Scenario B and BART controls were only applied in an 11

- state Midwest

region, the validity of the results for other Class I areas in the eastern U.S. may be

questionable. The Scenario C controls, on the other hand, cover all states and are, thus,

likely valid in other Class I areas.

Spatial plots of the future year ozone and PM2.5 concentrations are provided in Figures 2

– 4.

Based on these results, the following key findings should be noted:

Ozone

• There is little change from the previous LADCO modeling (Round 5.1 with CAIR)

• The modeling shows a ttainment of the 0.08 ppm (85 ppb) standard by 2009,

except Holland. (Note, Holland does meet this standard by 2012.)

• The modeling shows nonattainm ent of the 0.075 ppm (75 ppb) standard through

2018.

PM2.5

- Annual

• There is a significant change from the previous LADCO modeling (Round 5.1

with CAIR)

• The modeling shows extensive non atta inment of the annual standard.

PM2.5

- Daily

• There is a signif icant change from the previous LADCO modeling (Round 5.1

with CAIR)

• Th e modeling shows extensive nonattainment of the daily standard.

Haze

• There is a significant change from the previous LADCO modeling (Round 5.1

with CAIR)

• T he modeling shows higher vis ibility levels in 2018 for the 20% worst visibility

days (average about 0.5 deciviews for the northern Class I areas ). The resulting

visibility levels in the northern Class I areas (except Voyageurs) a re above t he

glide path.2005

Round 5

with CAIR Round 5

with CAIR Round 5

with CAIR

Site Site ID Base Year Scen. A Scen. B Scen.C Scen. A Scen. B Scen.C Scen. A Scen. B Scen.C Scen.C-BART

Lake Michigan Area

Chiwaukee 550590019 84.7 82.2 82.2 82.0 82.3 81.1 80.8 80.6 80.9 77.2 77.2 77.0 76.0 76.2

Racine 551010017 80.3 77.8 77.8 77.5 77.5 76.6 76.2 76.1 76.1 72.9 72.3 72.1 71.1 71.2

Milwaukee-Bayside 550890085 82.7 79.9 79.9 79.7 79.8 78.5 78.0 78.0 78.0 74.3 73.6 73.4 72.4 72.7

Harrington Beach 550890009 83.3 80.1 80.1 79.9 80.1 78.6 78.1 78.0 78.3 73.9 73.2 73.1 72.2 72.5

Manitowoc 550710007 85.0 80.8 80.8 80.7 80.8 79.0 78.5 78.4 78.6 73.9 73.2 73.1 72.0 72.5

Sheboygan 551170006 88.0 84.1 84.0 83.9 84.0 82.2 81.7 81.5 81.8 76.9 76.0 75.9 74.8 75.4

Kewaunee 550610002 82.7 78.2 78.2 78.0 78.1 76.4 75.9 75.7 75.9 71.3 70.7 70.5 69.4 69.9

Door County 550290004 88.7 84.1 84.1 83.9 83.9 82.0 81.4 81.3 81.5 76.5 75.6 75.5 74.2 74.7

Hammond 180892008 77.7 76.2 76.2 76.0 75.4 75.6 75.3 75.2 74.6 73.2 72.7 72.6 71.7 71.6

Whiting 180890030 79.3 77.8 77.8 77.7 77.0 77.2 76.9 76.8 76.2 74.8 74.3 74.2 73.2 73.1

Michigan City 180910005 77.0 74.5 74.5 74.3 73.9 73.3 72.9 72.8 72.5 69.7 69.2 69.1 68.1 68.1

Ogden Dunes 181270020 78.3 76.3 76.3 76.2 75.6 75.5 75.1 75.0 74.5 72.9 72.3 72.1 71.2 70.8

Holland 260050003 90.0 85.7 85.7 85.5 85.3 83.5 83.1 82.9 82.8 78.2 77.5 77.3 76.0 76.1

Jenison 261390005 82.0 76.8 76.8 76.7 76.0 75.1 74.6 74.5 74.5 70.2 69.6 69.5 67.9 68.7

Muskegon 261210039 85.0 80.6 80.6 80.5 80.5 78.6 78.2 78.1 78.0 73.5 72.8 72.8 71.5 71.9

Indianapolis Area

Noblesville 189571001 82.7 78.3 78.3 78.1 78.1 76.1 75.9 75.7 75.6 70.2 69.9 69.8 68.9 68.7

Fortville 180590003 78.0 74.1 74.1 73.9 73.9 71.9 71.8 71.7 71.4 66.7 66.5 66.3 65.4 65.1

Fort B. Harrison 180970050 78.7 75.4 75.3 75.2 75.1 73.8 73.6 73.6 73.2 70.6 70.3 70.2 69.3 69.1

Detroit Area

New Haven 260990009 86.0 82.4 82.3 82.1 81.4 81.4 81.2 81.1 80.2 78.1 77.8 77.7 76.5 76.1

Warren 260991003 84.0 82.4 82.3 82.2 81.3 82.1 81.8 81.7 80.7 79.7 79.4 79.3 78.0 77.6

Port Huron 261470005 82.7 78.2 78.2 78.1 77.5 76.5 76.3 76.2 75.5 72.6 72.5 72.3 70.9 70.9

Cleveland Area

Ashtabula 390071001 89.0 84.2 84.1 83.9 83.4 82.0 81.8 81.6 81.0 76.8 76.5 76.4 74.8 75.1

Geauga 390550004 79.3 75.8 75.8 75.6 74.7 74.0 73.8 73.7 72.7 69.5 69.2 69.1 67.6 67.3

Eastlake 390850003 86.3 83.1 83.1 82.9 81.9 81.8 81.6 81.5 80.5 78.2 78.0 77.8 76.5 76.2

Akron 391530020 83.7 79.1 79.1 79.0 78.1 76.9 76.7 76.6 75.6 70.9 70.6 70.4 68.7 68.7

Cincinnati Area

Wilmington 390271002 82.3 77.3 77.4 77.1 77.5 75.3 75.2 74.8 74.9 70.1 69.9 69.5 67.1 68.3

Sycamore 390610006 84.7 81.5 81.4 81.1 81.9 80.4 80.2 79.8 80.3 76.4 76.0 75.7 73.5 74.6

Lebanon 391650007 87.7 82.8 82.8 82.4 83.0 80.8 80.7 80.3 80.7 75.4 75.1 74.8 72.6 74.2

Columbus Area

London 390970007 79.7 75.0 75.0 74.8 75.0 73.0 72.8 72.7 72.6 68.1 67.8 67.6 65.9 66.3

New Albany 390490029 86.3 82.1 82.1 81.9 81.8 80.2 80.0 79.9 79.6 74.7 74.3 74.2 73.3 73.0

Franklin 290490028 80.3 76.7 76.6 76.5 75.9 75.1 74.9 74.8 74.1 70.5 70.2 70.1 70.2 69.0

St. Louis Area

W. Alton (MO) 291831002 86.3 81.1 81.2 81.1 81.0 80.0 79.9 79.9 78.6 76.9 76.8 76.7 74.2 74.9

Orchard (MO) 291831004 87.0 82.1 82.1 82.0 82.0 80.9 80.8 80.7 80.0 77.7 77.6 77.4 75.2 76.2

Sunset Hills (MO) 291890004 82.3 79.2 79.2 79.1 78.7 78.3 78.1 78.1 77.1 75.3 75.2 75.1 73.0 73.9

Arnold (MO) 290990012 82.3 77.8 77.8 77.7 77.2 76.7 76.6 76.5 75.6 73.6 73.4 73.4 71.3 72.0

Margaretta (MO) 295100086 83.0 79.8 79.8 79.7 79.3 78.8 78.7 78.6 77.9 75.7 75.6 75.5 73.7 74.4

Maryland Heights (MO) 291890014 87.3 85.4 85.4 85.3 84.0 84.3 84.1 84.0 81.7 81.1 80.9 80.8 78.4 78.1 Round 5 without CAIR Round 5 without CAIR Round 5 without CAIR 

# Table 2a. Ozone Modeling Results

2009 2012 20182005

Round 5

with CAIR Round 5

with CAIR Round 5

with CAIR

Site Site ID Base Year Scen. A Scen. B Scen.C Scen. A Scen. B Scen.C Scen. A Scen. B Scen.C Scen.C-BART

Illinois

Chicago - Washington HS 170310022 15.2 14.9 14.8 14.5 14.1 14.8 14.7 14.2 14.0 15.0 14.6 14.2 13.7 13.9

Chicago - Mayfair 170310052 15.8 15.1 15.1 14.8 14.4 15.1 14.9 14.5 14.2 15.1 14.7 14.3 13.7 13.9

Chicago - Springfield 170310057 15.0 14.6 14.6 14.3 13.9 14.6 14.4 14.0 13.8 14.8 14.4 14.0 13.4 13.7

Chicago - Lawndale 170310076 14.9 14.5 14.5 14.2 13.8 14.5 14.3 13.9 13.7 14.7 14.3 13.9 13.3 13.6

Blue Island 170312001 14.8 14.4 14.4 14.0 13.7 14.4 14.2 13.8 13.6 14.5 14.1 13.7 13.2 13.4

Summit 170313301 15.2 14.9 14.9 14.6 14.2 14.9 14.7 14.3 14.0 15.0 14.6 14.3 13.7 13.9

Cicero 170316005 15.5 15.1 15.1 14.8 14.4 15.1 14.9 14.5 14.3 15.2 14.9 14.4 13.9 14.2

Granite City 171191007 16.7 16.3 16.2 15.9 15.1 16.1 16.0 15.3 14.9 15.9 15.6 14.9 14.2 14.3

E. St. Louis 171630010 15.6 15.2 15.2 14.8 14.1 15.0 14.9 14.3 13.9 14.9 14.6 14.0 13.3 13.4

Indiana

Jeffersonville 180190005 16.4 15.8 15.7 14.8 13.8 15.8 15.6 14.5 13.7 16.0 15.5 14.3 13.7 13.4

Jasper 180372001 15.2 14.3 14.2 13.4 12.4 14.2 14.0 13.0 12.2 14.3 13.9 12.8 12.1 11.8

Gary 180890031 15.6 13.9 13.9 13.5 13.0 13.8 13.6 13.1 12.8 13.7 13.4 12.9 12.3 12.4

Indy-Washington Park 180970078 15.3 14.4 14.4 13.6 12.8 14.3 14.2 13.2 12.6 14.3 13.9 12.9 12.2 12.0

Indy-W 18th Street 180970081 16.0 15.1 15.1 14.3 15.0 14.9 13.9 15.0 14.6 13.5 12.8

Indy- Michigan Street 180970083 15.9 15.0 15.0 14.2 13.4 14.9 14.8 13.8 13.1 14.9 14.5 13.5 12.8 12.6

Michigan

Allen Park 261630001 14.5 11.0 14.0 13.5 13.0 14.0 13.8 13.2 12.8 13.9 13.6 13.0 12.4 12.4

Southwest HS 261630015 15.9 15.3 15.3 14.8 14.2 15.2 15.0 14.4 13.9 15.1 14.8 14.1 13.5 13.5

Linwood 261630016 14.6 14.1 14.1 13.6 13.1 14.0 13.9 13.3 12.8 13.9 13.6 13.0 12.5 12.5

Dearborn 261630033 17.5 17.0 17.0 16.4 15.8 16.9 16.7 16.0 15.5 16.8 16.4 15.7 15.1 15.1

Wyandotte 261630036 14.7 14.2 14.1 13.6 13.1 14.1 13.9 13.3 12.8 14.0 13.7 13.0 12.4 12.5

Ohio

Middletown - Bonita 390170003 16.2 15.3 15.2 14.3 13.5 15.2 15.0 13.9 13.2 15.2 14.8 13.7 13.0 12.8

Fairfield 390170016 15.8 15.1 15.0 14.1 13.1 15.1 14.9 13.7 12.9 15.2 14.7 13.5 12.8 12.5

Cleveland-28th Street 390350027 15.4 14.9 14.9 14.3 13.5 14.7 14.5 13.9 13.2 14.6 14.2 13.5 12.8 12.7

Cleveland-St. Tikhon 390350038 17.4 16.7 16.7 16.0 15.2 16.5 16.3 15.6 14.8 16.3 16.0 15.2 14.4 14.3

Cleveland-Broadway 390350045 16.5 15.9 15.8 15.2 14.4 15.6 15.5 14.8 14.0 15.5 15.1 14.4 13.6 13.5

Cleveland-GT Craig 390350060 17.1 16.5 16.4 15.8 15.0 16.3 16.1 15.4 14.6 16.1 15.7 15.0 14.2 14.1

Newburg Hts - Harvard Ave 390350065 16.0 15.4 15.3 14.7 14.0 15.2 15.0 14.3 13.6 15.1 14.7 14.0 13.2 13.1

Columbus - Fairgrounds 390490024 15.3 14.6 14.5 13.7 12.9 14.4 14.1 13.2 12.6 14.2 13.8 12.8 12.2 12.0

Columbus - Ann Street 390490025 15.1 14.4 14.3 13.5 12.7 14.2 13.9 13.1 12.4 14.1 13.6 12.6 12.0 11.9

Cincinnati - Seymour 390610014 17.3 16.6 16.5 15.5 14.5 16.5 16.3 15.1 14.3 16.6 16.2 14.9 14.2 13.8

Cincinnati - Taft Ave 390610040 15.5 14.8 14.7 13.8 12.8 14.8 14.6 13.4 12.6 14.9 14.5 13.2 12.5 12.2

Cincinnati - 8th Ave 390610042 16.9 12.0 16.1 15.0 14.0 16.1 15.9 14.7 13.8 16.2 15.7 14.4 13.7 13.4

Sharonville 390610043 15.6 14.9 14.8 13.9 12.9 14.9 14.7 13.5 12.7 14.9 14.5 13.3 12.6 12.3

Norwood 390617001 16.2 15.5 15.4 14.4 13.4 15.4 15.2 14.0 13.2 15.5 15.1 13.8 13.1 12.8

St. Bernard 390618001 17.6 16.8 16.7 15.7 14.7 16.7 16.5 15.3 14.4 16.8 16.4 15.1 14.3 14.0

Steubenville 390810016 15.8 14.5 14.4 13.5 12.8 14.3 14.2 13.1 12.5 14.8 14.5 13.3 12.9 12.7

Mingo Junction 390811001 16.5 15.2 15.2 14.3 13.5 15.0 14.9 13.8 13.2 15.6 15.2 14.0 13.6 13.4

Ironton 390870010 15.2 14.8 14.6 13.6 12.8 14.6 14.4 13.2 12.5 14.8 14.1 12.8 12.4 12.3

Dayton 391130032 15.5 14.9 14.8 14.0 13.2 14.8 14.6 13.6 12.9 14.8 14.3 13.3 12.6 12.4

New Boston 391450013 14.7 12.0 14.0 13.0 12.1 14.1 13.8 12.5 11.9 14.2 13.6 12.2 11.7 11.6

Canton - Dueber 391510017 16.3 15.7 15.6 14.8 14.0 15.5 15.3 14.4 13.6 15.4 14.9 14.0 13.3 13.3

Canton - Market 391510020 14.6 11.0 14.1 13.3 12.6 13.9 13.7 12.9 12.3 13.9 13.5 12.6 12.0 11.9

Akron - Brittain 391530017 15.1 14.6 14.5 13.8 13.0 14.4 14.2 13.4 12.7 14.3 13.8 13.0 12.3 12.3

Akron - W. Exchange 391530023 14.3 13.7 13.7 13.0 12.3 13.6 13.3 12.6 12.0 13.4 13.0 12.2 11.6 11.5 Round 5 without CAIR Round 5 without CAIR Round 5 without CAIR

2009 2018 2012 

# Table 2b. PM 2.5 

# Modeling Results (Annual)2005

Round 5

with CAIR Round 5

with CAIR Round 5

with CAIR

Key Site County Site ID Base Year Scen. A Scen. B Scen.C Scen. A Scen. B Scen.C Scen. A Scen. B Scen.C Scen. C - BART

Illinois

Chicago - Washington HS Cook 170310022 36.6 36 36 36 36 36 36 37 36 37 36 37 37 35

Chicago - Mayfair Cook 170310052 40.3 37 37 37 36 37 36 37 36 38 37 37 37 36

Chicago - Springfield Cook 170310057 37.4 34 34 33 32 35 34 33 32 36 34 33 33 31

Chicago - Lawndale Cook 170310076 38.1 35 35 35 35 36 35 36 35 36 35 36 36 34

McCook Cook 170311016 43.0 39 39 39 39 40 39 40 39 40 40 41 40 38

Blue Island Cook 170312001 37.7 35 35 35 34 36 35 36 34 36 35 36 36 33

Schiller Park Cook 170313103 41.6 40 40 40 39 40 40 40 39 41 40 40 39 39

Summit Cook 170313301 40.2 38 38 39 38 39 38 39 38 39 38 39 39 37

Maywood Cook 170316005 39.2 38 38 38 38 38 38 39 38 39 38 39 39 37

Granite City Madison 171191007 39.2 36 36 35 33 36 35 34 33 36 35 35 33 32

E. St. Louis St. Clair 171630010 33.7 31 31 30 28 31 30 29 28 31 30 30 29 28

Indiana

Jeffersonville Clark 180190005 38.4 35 33 31 29 35 34 32 31 37 35 34 33 31

Jasper Dubois 180372001 36.2 32 32 30 28 32 32 30 29 33 31 31 30 28

Gary - IITRI Lake 180890022 39.0 35 35 35 34 35 34 35 34 36 36 36 35 35

Gary - Burr School Lake 180890026 39.0 34 34 34 33 34 34 35 34 34 34 34 34 32

Gary Lake 180890031 35.2 29 28 26 24 28 28 24 24 29 28 27 27 27

Indy-West Street Marion 180970043 38.0 34 34 33 33 35 35 34 33 36 35 34 34 33

Indy-English Avenue Marion 180970066 38.0 34 34 32 32 35 34 33 32 35 34 33 33 32

Indy-Washington Park Marion 180970078 36.6 33 33 32 31 33 33 32 31 34 33 32 32 32

Indy-W 18th Street Marion 180970081 38.3 33 33 31 31 33 33 32 31 34 33 32 32 31

Indy- Michigan Street Marion 180970083 36.0 32 32 29 28 32 31 29 28 32 31 29 29 29

Michigan

Luna Pier Monroe 261150005 38.9 34 34 32 32 34 34 32 32 34 33 32 31 31

Oak Park Oakland 261250001 39.9 38 38 37 36 38 37 37 36 38 37 37 36 35

Port Huron St. Clair 261470005 39.6 36 35 35 34 35 35 35 34 35 35 34 33 33

Ypsilanti Washtenaw 261610008 39.5 37 37 36 35 37 36 36 35 37 36 36 35 34

Allen Park Wayne 261630001 38.6 36 36 36 35 36 35 35 34 36 35 35 34 33

Southwest HS Wayne 261630015 40.1 36 36 36 35 36 35 35 35 36 35 35 34 33

Linwood Wayne 261630016 43.0 40 40 40 39 40 40 40 39 40 39 39 39 38

E 7 Mile Wayne 261630019 41.0 39 39 39 38 39 39 39 38 39 38 38 38 37

Dearborn Wayne 261630033 43.9 41 41 41 40 41 41 41 40 41 40 40 40 39

Wyandotte Wayne 261630036 37.2 36 36 36 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 34

Newberry Wayne 261630038 42.7 39 39 39 38 39 38 38 37 39 38 38 37 36

FIA Wayne 261630039 39.7 35 34 34 33 35 34 34 33 35 34 33 33 31

Ohio

Middleton Butler 390170003 39.3 33 32 29 28 33 33 29 28 34 32 29 28 27

Fairfield Butler 390170016 37.1 32 31 29 27 31 30 28 28 32 30 29 28 27

Butler 390170017 40.8 33 32 30 29 33 33 30 29 33 32 30 29 28

Cleveland-28th Street Cuyahoga 390350027 36.9 34 34 33 32 34 33 33 32 34 33 33 31 31

Cleveland-St. Tikhon Cuyahoga 390350038 44.2 40 40 37 36 40 39 36 35 40 38 36 35 34

Cleveland-Broadway Cuyahoga 390350045 38.8 35 35 33 31 35 34 32 30 35 34 31 29 29

Cleveland-GT Craig Cuyahoga 390350060 42.1 39 39 38 37 39 38 38 37 39 38 37 36 35

Newburg Hts - Harvard Ave Cuyahoga 390350065 38.9 35 35 33 31 35 34 32 30 36 35 32 31 30

Columbus - Fairgrounds Franklin 390490024 38.5 34 34 33 33 34 33 32 32 34 34 33 32 31

Columbus - Ann Street Franklin 390490025 38.5 34 33 31 31 33 33 31 31 34 33 31 31 30

Cincinnait Hamilton 390610006 40.6 33 33 30 27 33 32 29 28 34 32 29 28 27 Round 5 without CAIR Round 5 without CAIR Round 5 without CAIR

2009 2012 2018 

# Table 2c. PM 2.5 

# Modeling Results (Daily)2005

Round 5

with CAIR Round 5

with CAIR Round 5

with CAIR

Key Site County Site ID Base Year Scen. A Scen. B Scen.C Scen. A Scen. B Scen.C Scen. A Scen. B Scen.C Scen. C - BART Round 5 without CAIR Round 5 without CAIR Round 5 without CAIR

2009 2012 2018 

# Table 2c. PM 2.5 

# Modeling Results (Daily)

Cincinnati - Seymour Hamilton 390610014 38.4 33 33 28 26 33 32 27 25 33 31 29 25 24

Cincinnati - Taft Ave Hamilton 390610040 36.7 31 30 26 24 31 30 26 24 32 29 26 24 23

Cincinnati - 8th Ave Hamilton 390610042 37.3 32 32 30 28 32 31 29 28 33 31 29 28 27

Sharonville Hamilton 390610043 36.0 32 31 30 28 32 31 29 28 32 31 29 28 27

Norwood Hamilton 390617001 38.8 34 33 32 30 33 33 31 30 34 33 31 30 29

St. Bernard Hamilton 390618001 40.6 35 35 32 30 35 34 31 30 35 33 32 31 29

Steubenville Jefferson 390810016 40.7 36 35 32 29 35 34 30 28 37 35 31 29 28

Mingo Junction Jefferson 390811001 42.0 37 37 33 30 37 36 32 30 38 36 32 30 30

Dayton Montgomery 391130032 37.8 34 33 31 30 33 33 31 30 34 33 31 31 30

Canton - Dueber Stark 391510017 38.6 33 32 30 28 33 31 30 28 33 30 29 28 27

Akron - Brittain Summit 391530017 38.1 33 33 31 30 33 32 31 30 33 32 30 29 29

Wisconsin

Green Bay - Est High Brown 550090005 37.1 35 34 35 35 34 35 35 34 33 33 33 32 32

Madison Dane 550250047 36.4 33 33 32 32 33 32 32 31 32 31 30 29 29

Milwaukee-Health Center Milwaukee 550790010 38.7 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 34 35 34 34 34 33

Milwaukee-SER Hdqs Milwaukee 550790026 37.4 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 33

Milwaukee-Virginia FS Milwaukee 550790043 39.9 37 37 37 36 37 36 37 36 36 36 37 36 36

Milwaukee- Fire Dept Hdqs Milwaukee 550790099 37.8 34 34 33 33 34 33 33 32 34 33 33 33 32

Waukesha Waukesha 551330027 35.5 32 32 32 31 32 32 32 31 32 31 31 30 29

### 10 

### Table 3. Mo deling Res ults: Number of Sites > NAAQS

Ozone (85 ppb) Round 5 without CAIR Round 5 w/ CAIR

2009 Baseyear Scen. A Scen. B Scen. C Scen. C

- BART

IL 0 0 0 0

---- 0

IN 0 0 0 0

---- 0

MI 3 1 1 1

---- 1

OH 4 0 0 0

---- 0

WI 2 0 0 0

---- 0

Total 9 1 1 1 1

2012

IL 0 0 0 0

---- 0

IN 0 0 0 0

---- 0

MI 3 0 0 0

---- 0

OH 4 0 0 0

---- 0

WI 2 0 0 0

---- 0

Total 9 0 0 0 0

2018

IL 0 0 0 0 0 0

IN 0 0 0 0 0 0

MI 3 0 0 0 0 0

OH 4 0 0 0 0 0

WI 2 0 0 0 0 0

Total 9 0 0 0 0 0

O zone (75 ppb) Round 5 without CAIR Round5 w/ CAIR

2009 Baseyear Scen. A Scen. B Scen. C Scen. C

- BART

IL 12 6 6 6

---- 4

IN 26 10 9 8

---- 5

MI 21 12 12 12

---- 12

OH 45 27 25 24

---- 21

WI 12 10 10 10

---- 10

Total 116 65 62 60

---- 52

20 12

IL 12 3 3 3

---- 1

IN 26 5 4 4

---- 3

MI 21 9 8 8

---- 6

OH 45 18 14 12

---- 11

WI 12 10 9 9

---- 9

Total 116 45 38 36 30

2018

IL 12 0 0 0 0 0

IN 26 0 0 0 0 0

MI 21 3 3 3 3 3

OH 45 3 3 2 1 1

WI 12 3 2 1 1 1

Total 116 9 8 6 5 5

### 11

PM2.5

- Annual Round 5 without CAIR Round 5 w/ CAIR

2009 Baseyear Scen. A Scen. B Scen. C Scen. C

- BART

IL 7 4 4 1

---- 1

IN 6 2 2 0

---- 0

MI 2 2 2 1

---- 1

OH 26 1 3 12 5

---- 1

WI 0 0 0 0

---- 0

Total 41 21 20 7 3

2012

IL 7 3 1 1

---- 0

IN 6 1 1 0

---- 0

MI 2 2 1 1

---- 1

OH 26 12 9 4

---- 0

WI 0 0 0 0

---- 0

Total 41 18 12 6 1

2018

IL 7 3 1 0 0 0

IN 6 1 1 0 0 0

MI 2 2 1 1 1 1

OH 26 13 8 2 0 0

WI 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 41 19 11 3 1 1

PM2.5

- Daily

Round 5 without CAIR Round 5 w/ CAIR

2009 Baseyear Scen. A Scen. B Scen. C Scen. C

- BART

IL 16 7 7 6

---- 6

IN 13 0 0 0

---- 0

MI 14 10 9 9

---- 5

OH 31 4 3 2

---- 2

WI 8 1 1 1

---- 1

Total 82 2 2 20 18

---- 14

2012

IL 16 9 6 8

---- 6

IN 13 0 0 0

---- 0

MI 14 8 6 6

---- 5

OH 31 3 3 2

---- 1

WI 8 1 1 1

---- 1

Total 82 21 16 1 7 13

2018

IL 16 10 6 8 8 5

IN 13 4 1 1 0 0

MI 14 8 6 6 5 4

OH 31 5 3 2 1 0

WI 8 1 1 1 1 1

Total 82 2 8 17 18 1 5 10

### 12 

### Ta ble 4 . Mo deling Results: Future Year Visibility Levels

Worst 20% 2018

Round 5 without CAIR Round 5 w/ CAIR

Site Baseline

(2000

- 2004) 2018 URP Scen. A Scen. B Scen. C Scen. C

BART

BOWA1 19.86 17.94 19.09 18.87 18.54 18.02 17.94

VOYA2 19.48 17.75 18.60 18.44 18.17 17.77 17.63

SENE1 24.38 21.64 24.02 23.58 23.03 22.38 22.59

ISLE1 21.59 19.43 21.05 20.86 20.62 20.22 20.09

ISLE9 21.59 19.43 20.83 20.58 20.38 19.84 19.84

HEGL1 26.75 23.13 26.24 25.83 24.87 24.23 24.22

MI NG1 28.15 24.27 27.51 26.98 25.81 24.93 24.74

CACR1 26.36 22.91 25.32 24.80 23.57 22.97 22.44

UPBU1 26.27 22.82 25.31 24.79 23.50 22.79 22.59

MACA1 31.37 26.64 30.11 29.08 27.06 26.24 26.10

DOSO1 29.05 24.69 27.88 26.96 24.36 23.74 23.00

SHEN1 29 .31 25.12 28.38 27.65 25.24 24.69 23.92

JARI1 29.12 24.91 28.06 27.21 25.00 24.48 24.06

BRIG1 29.01 25.05 28.10 28.07 26.57 26.25 25.21

LYBR1 24.45 21.48 24.06 23.86 22.58 22.30 21.14

ACAD1 22.89 20.45 22.88 22.76 22.31 22.16 21.49

Best 20% 2018

Round 5 without CAIR Round 5 w/ CAIR

Site Baseline

(2000

- 2004) 2018 Max Scen. A Scen. B Scen. C Scen. C

BART

BOWA1 6.42 6.42 6.20 6.17 6.16 6.12 6.14

VOYA2 7.09 7.09 6.87 6.83 6.81 6.78 6.75

SENE1 7.14 7.14 7.80 7.78 7. 81 7.77 7.71

ISLE1 6.75 6.75 6.77 6.76 6.72 6.67 6.60

ISLE9 6.75 6.75 6.63 6.61 6.58 6.53 6.52

HEGL1 12.84 12.84 12.17 12.20 12.07 11.63 11.66

MING1 14.46 14.46 13.78 13.77 13.70 13.37 13.28

CACR1 11.24 11.24 10.94 10.99 10.97 10.78 10. 52

UPBU1 11.71 11.71 11.18 11.23 11.18 10.96 10.73

MACA1 16.51 16.51 16.32 16.21 15.76 15.34 15.25

DOSO1 12.28 12.28 12.02 11.84 11.27 11.03 11.00

SHEN1 10.93 10.93 10.98 10.91 10.25 10.16 9.91

JARI1 14.21 14.21 14.19 13.98 13.42 13.21 13.14

BRI G1 14.33 14.33 14.32 14.46 14.22 14.17 13.92

LYBR1 6.37 6.37 6.39 6.38 6.31 6.28 6.14

ACAD1 8.78 8.78 8.97 8.96 8.90 8.89 8.82

### 13 

### Figure 2. Ozone Modeling Results

2009 Round 5

–

S cen

. A Round 5

– Scen. B Round 5

– Scen. C Round 5

- CAIR

2012 Round 5

–

Scen. A Round 5

– Scen. B Round 5

– Scen. C Round 5

- CAIR

2018 Round 5

–

Scen. A Round 5

– Scen. B Round 5

– Scen. C Round 5

- CAIR

### 14 

### Figure 3. PM2.5 Annual Modeling Results

2009 Round 5

– Scen. A Round 5

– S cen. B Round 5

– Scen. C Round 5

- CAIR

2012 Round 5

– Scen. A Round 5

– Scen. B Round 5

– Scen. C Round 5

- CAIR

2018 Round 5

– Scen. A Round 5

– Scen. B Round 5

– Scen. C Round 5

- CAIR

### 15 

### Figure 4 . PM2.5 Daily Modeling Results

2009 Round 5

– Scen. A Round 5

– Scen. B Round 5

– Scen. C Round 5

- CAIR

2012 Round 5

– Scen. A Round 5

– Scen. B Round 5

– Scen. C Round 5

- CAIR

2018 Round 5

– Scen. A Round 5

– Scen. B Round 5

– Scen. C Round 5

- CAIR

# Appendix I

Scenario B (Legally Enforceable) ControlsNOx

– 2009

Point Source Grown and Controlled Emissions by facility for NOX r6s1b_2009 Base Year = 2002

Future Year = 2009

STID=17 CYID=57 fcid=057801AAA name=AES DUCK CREEK

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 57 057801AAA 0001 0001 01 10100202 NOX 0.8147 0.8416 0.8416 0.00 0.00 SCR SCR added by LADCO

STID=17 CYID=143 fcid=143805AAG name=AES ED EDWARDS STATION

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 143 143805AAG 0001 0001 01 10100202 NOX 3.0515 3.1522 3.1522 0.00 0.00 lnb LNB added by LADCO

17 143 143805AAG 0001 0003 01 10100202 NOX 6.9419 7.1708 7.1708 0.00 0.00 lnb LNB added by LADCO

17 143 143805AAG 0002 0004 01 10100202 NOX 2.1310 2.2013 2.2013 0.00 0.00 lnb LNB added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 12.1244 12.5243 12.5243

cyid 12.1244 12.5243 12.5243

stid 12.9392 13.3659 13.3659

STID=39 CYID=1 fcid=0701000007 name="DP&L, J.M. STUART GENERATING STATION"

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrlde s

39 1 0701000007 R1 B001 B001P1 10100202 NOX 6.9860 6.9756 2.3252 0.85 0.95 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 1 0701000007 R2 B002 B002P1 10100202 NO X 3.6327 3.6273 1.2091 0.85 0.95 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 1 0701000007 R3 B003 B003P1 10100202 NOX 5.0133 5.0058 1.6686 0.85 0.95 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 1 0701000007 R4 B004 B004P1 10100202 NOX 7.8493 7.8376 2.6125 0.85 0.95 SCR SCR added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 23.4814 23.4464 7.8155

cyi d 23.4814 23.4464 7.8155

STID=39 CYID=167 fcid=0684000000 name=MUSKINGUM RIVER POWER PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control E F Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

39 167 0684000000 R1 B001 B001P1 10200501 NOX 0.0017 0.0017 0.0001 0.00 0.95 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R2 B002 B002P1 10100201 NOX 5.8167 5.8080 0.2904 0.00 0.95 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R2 B002 B002P2 10100501 NOX 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 0.95 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R3 B003 B003P1 10100201 NOX 7.9017 7.8899 0.3945 0.00 0.95 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R3 B003 B003P2 10100501 NOX 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 0.95 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R4 B004 B004P1 10100203 NOX 7.8775 7.8657 0.3933 0.00 0.95 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R4 B004 B004P2 10100501 NOX 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 0.95 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R6 B006 B006P1 10100202 NOX 3.8586 3.8528 0.1926 0.00 0.95 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R6 B006 B006P2 10100501 NOX 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 0.95 SCR SCR added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- f cid 25.4561 25.4182 1.2709

cyid 25.4561 25.4182 1.2709

stid 48.9375 48.8646 9.0864

STID=55 CYID=79 fcid=241007800 name=WIS ELECTRIC POWER VALLEY STATION

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future YearSTID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

55 79 241007800 S11 B21 01 10100202 NOX 2.7972 2.8 895 1.6470 0.00 0.43 SCR SCR added by LADCO

55 79 241007800 S11 B22 01 10100202 NOX 2.9073 3.0032 1.7118 0.00 0.43 SCR SCR added by LADCO

55 79 241007800 S12 B23 01 10100202 NOX 2.3270 2.4038 1.2740 0.00 0.47 SCR SCR added by LADCO

55 79 241007800 S12 B24 01 1010020 2 NOX 2.3427 2.4199 1.2826 0.00 0.47 SCR Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 10.3742 10.7164 5.9154

cyid 10.3742 10.7164 5.9154

STID=55 CYID=117 fcid=460033090 name=WP & L Alliant Energy

- Edgewater Gen Station

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

55 117 460033090 S1 1 B23 01 10100203 NOX 1.6197 1.6731 1.0038 0.00 0.40 SCR SCR added by LADCO

55 117 460033090 S11 B24 01 10100203 NOX 4.1072 4.2426 3. 4789 0.00 0.18 SCR SCR added by LADCO

55 117 460033090 S12 B25 01 10100221 NOX 5.6804 5.8677 4.9876 0.00 0.15 SCR SCR added by LADCO

- --- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 11.4072 11.7834 9.4703

cyid 11.4072 11.7834 9.4703

stid 21.7814 22.4997 15.3857

======== ======== ==========

83.6581 84.7302 37.8380NOx

- 2012

Point Source Grown and Controlled Emissions by facility for N OX r6s1b_2012 Base Year = 2002

Future Year = 2012

STID=17 CYID=33 fcid=0338 01AAA name=AMEREN ENERGY GENERATING CO

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc poli d Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 33 033801AAA 0005 0005 01 10100202 NOX 1.642 1.871 0.9357 0.00 0.500 SCR SCR added by LADCO

17 33 033801AAA 0006 0006 01 10100202 NOX 2.116 2.413 1.2063 0.00 0.500 SCR SCR added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 3.758 4.284 2.1420

cyid 3.758 4.284 2.1420

STID=17 CYID=57 fcid=057801AAA name=AES DUCK CREEK

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 57 057801AAA 0001 0001 01 10100202 NOX 0.815 0.929 0.9288 0.00 0.000 SCR SCR added by LADCO

STID=17 CYID=79 fcid=079808AAA name=AMER EN ENERGY GENERATING CO

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 79 079808AAA 0003 0003 01 10100202 NOX 6.735 7.678 7.6780 0.00 0.000 SCR SCR added by LADCO

17 79 079808AAA 0012 0013 01 10100501 NOX 5.936 5.378 5.3781 0.00 0.000 SCR SCR added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 12.671 13.056 13.0561

cyid 12.671 13.056 13.0561

STID=17 CYID=97 fcid=097190AAC name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctr ltype ctrldes

17 97 097190AAC 0016 0031 02 10100401 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SCR added by LADCO

STID=17 CYID=137 fcid=137805AAA name=AMEREN ENE RGY GENERATING CO

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons /Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 137 137805AAA 0003 0003 01 10100202 NOX 5.356 6.106 6.1058 0.00 0.000 LNB LNB added by LADCO

STID=17 CYID=143 fcid=143805AAG name=AES ED EDWARDS STATION

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 143 143805AAG 0001 0001 01 10100202 NOX 3.052 3.479 3.4789 0.00 0.000 lnb LNB added by LADCO

17 143 143805AAG 0001 0003 01 10100202 NOX 6.942 7.914 7.9141 0.00 0.000 lnb LNB added by LADCO

17 143 14

3805AAG 0002 0004 01 10100202 NOX 2.131 2.429 2.4294 0.00 0.000 lnb LNB added by LADCO

---- -------- - ------- ---------- fcid 12.124 13.822 13.8224

cyid 12.124 13.822 13.8224STID=17 CYID=167 fcid=167120AAO name=CITY WATER LIGHT & POWER

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 167 167120AAO 0010 0012 01 10100203 NOX 6.527 7.441 0.0074 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SHUTDOWN added by LADCO

17 167 167120AAO 0010 0013 01 10100203 NOX 2.646 3.017 0.0030 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SHUTDOWN added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 9.173 10.458 0.0105

cyid 9.173 10.458 0.0 105

STID=17 CYID=179 fcid=179801AAA name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 179 179801AAA 0018 0029 01 10 100203 NOX 22.429 25.570 1.2785 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

17 179 179801AAA 0018 0031 01 10100203 NOX 38.993 44.454 2.2227 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 61.422 7 0.024 3.5012

cyid 61.422 70.024 3.5012

STID=17 CYID=197 fcid=197809AAO name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 197 197809AAO 0032 0033 02 10100604 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.800 SCR SCR added by LADCO

STID=17 CYID=197 fcid=197810AAK name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year F uture Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 197 197810AAK 0011 0016 02 10100222 NOX 5.731 6.534 3.9203 0.00 0.400 SCR SCR added by LADCO

17 197 197810AAK 0011 0016 03 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.400 SCR SCR added by LADCO

17 197 197810AAK 0013 0010 02 10100223 NOX 8.598 9.802 0.0098 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SCR added by LADCO

17 197 197810AAK 0013 0010 03 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SCR added by LADCO

17 197 197810AAK 0007 0012 02 10100223 NOX 10.974 12.511 0.01 25 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SCR added by LADCO

17 197 197810AAK 0007 0012 03 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SCR added by LADCO

-- -- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 25.303 28.847 3.9426

cyid 25.303 28.847 3.9426

stid 130.622 147.527 43.5096

STID=27 CYID=61 fcid=2706100004 name=Minnesota Power Inc

- Boswell Energy Ctr

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

27 61 2706100004 SV003 EU003 001 10100226 NOX 13.661 14.142 2.8284 0.00 0.800 SCR SCR added by LADCO

27 61 2706100004 SV003 EU00 3 002 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.800 SCR SCR added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fci d 13.661 14.142 2.8284

cyid 13.661 14.142 2.8284

STID=27 CYID=109 fcid=2710900011 name=Rochester Public Utilities

- Silver Lake

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes27 1 09 2710900011 SV003 EU004 001 10100202 NOX 2.079 2.152 1.2911 0.00 0.400 SNCR SCR added by LADCO

---- ---- ---- -------- ---------- stid 15.739 16.294 4.1195

STID=39 CYID=1 fcid=0701000007 name="DP&L, J.M. STUART GENERATING STATION"

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid T ons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

39 1 0701000007 R1 B001 B001P1 10100202 NOX 6.986 7.296 2.4319 0.85 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 1 0701000007 R2 B002 B002P1 10100202 NOX 3.633 3.794 1.2646 0.85 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 1 0701000007 R3 B003 B003P 1 10100202 NOX 5.013 5.235 1.7452 0.85 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 1 0701000007 R4 B004 B004P1 10100202 NOX 7.849 8.197 2.7324 0.85 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 23.481 24.522 8.1740

cyid 23.481 24.522 8.1740

STID=39 CYID=31 fcid=0616000000 name=CONESVILLE POWER PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid s tkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

39 31 0616000000 R4 B004 B004P1 10100212 NOX 20.852 21.776 1.0888 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

STID=39 CYID=167 fcid=0684000000 name=MUSKINGUM RIVER POWER PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

39 167 0684000000 R1 B001 B001P1 10200501 NOX 0.002 0.002 0.0001 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R2 B002 B002P1 10100201 NOX 5.817 6.074 0.3037 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R2 B002 B002P2 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 167 068400

0000 R3 B003 B003P1 10100201 NOX 7.902 8.252 0.4126 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R3 B003 B003P2 10100501 NOX 0.000 0. 000 0.0000 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R4 B004 B004P1 10100203 NOX 7.877 8.227 0.4113 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R4 B004 B004P2 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R6 B006 B006P1 1010 0202 NOX 3.859 4.030 0.2015 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R6 B006 B006P2 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0. 950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 25.456 26. 584 1.3292

cyid 25.456 26.584 1.3292

stid 69.789 72.882 10.5920

STID=55 CYID=79 fcid=241007690 name=WIS ELECTRIC POWER OAK CR EEK STATION

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

55 79 241007690 S13 B25 01 10100202 NOX 4.755 5.421 3.0898 0.00 0.430 SCR SCR added by LADCO

55 79 241007690 S13 B26 01 10100202 NOX 3.277 3.736 2.2045 0.00 0.410 SCR SCR added by LADCO

55 79 241007690 S14 B27 01 10100212 NOX 3.333 3.800 2.8499 0.00 0.250 SCR SCR added by LADCO

55 79 241007690 S14 B28 01 10100212 NOX 3.384 3.857 2.9316 0.00 0.240 SC R SCR added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 14.749 16.814 11. 0757

STID=55 CYID=79 fcid=241007800 name=WIS ELECTRIC POWER VALLEY STATIONBase Yr Grown Controll ed Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

55 79 241007800 S11 B21 0 1 10100202 NOX 2.797 3.189 1.8177 0.00 0.430 SCR SCR added by LADCO

55 79 241007800 S11 B22 01 10100202 NOX 2.907 3.314 1.8893 0.0 0 0.430 SCR SCR added by LADCO

55 79 241007800 S12 B23 01 10100202 NOX 2.327 2.653 1.4061 0.00 0.470 SCR SCR added by LADCO

55 79 241007800 S12 B24 01 10100202 NOX 2.343 2.671 1.4155 0.00 0.470 SCR Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 10.374 11.827 6.5285

cyid 25.123 28.641 17.6042

STID=55 CYID=117 fcid=460033090 name=WP & L Alliant Energy

- Edgewater Gen Station

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrl type ctrldes

55 117 460033090 S11 B23 01 10100203 NOX 1.620 1.846 1.1079 0.00 0.400 SCR SCR added by LADCO

55 117 460033090 S11 B24 0 1 10100203 NOX 4.107 4.682 3.8395 0.00 0.180 SCR SCR added by LADCO

55 117 460033090 S12 B25 01 10100221 NOX 5.680 6.476 5.5045 0.0 0 0.150 SCR SCR added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 11 .407 13.005 10.4519

cyid 11.407 13.005 10.4519

stid 36.530 41.646 28.0562

======== ======== ==========

252.681 278.349 86.2773NOx 20 18

Point Source Grown and Controlled Emissions by facility for NOX r6s1b_2018 Base Year = 2002

Future Year = 2018

STID=17 CYID=31 fcid=031600AIN name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 31 031600AIN 0010 0013 01 10100226 NOX 2.283 2. 592 1.5550 0.00 0.400 SCR SCR added by LADCO

17 31 031600AIN 0010 0013 02 10100601 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.400 SCR SCR added by LADCO

17 31 031600AIN 0012 0016 01 10100226 NOX 3.991 4.531 2.7184 0.00 0.400 SCR SCR added by LADCO

17 31 031600AIN 0012 0016 02 1010 0601 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.400 SCR SCR added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 6.274 7.122 4.2734

cyid 6.274 7. 122 4.2734

STID=17 CYID=33 fcid=033801AAA name=AMEREN ENERGY GENERATING CO

Base Yr Grown Co ntrolled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 33 033801AAA 0005 0005 01 10100202 NOX 1.642 1.863 0.9317 0.00 0.500 SCR SCR added by LADCO

17 33 033801AAA 0006 0006 01 10100202 NOX 2.116 2.402 1.2012 0.00 0.500 SCR SCR added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 3.758 4.266 2.1329

cyid 3.758 4.266 2.1329

STID=17 CYID=57 fcid=057801AAA name=AES DUCK CREEK

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 57 057801AAA 0001 0001 01 10100202 NOX 0.815 0.925 0.924 9 0.00 0.000 SCR SCR added by LADCO

STID=17 CYID=79 fcid=079808AAA name=AMEREN ENERGY GENERATING CO

Base Yr Grown Controlled Ba se Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 79 079808AAA 0003 0003 01 10100202 NOX 6.735 7.645 7.6453 0.00 0.000 SCR SCR added by LADCO

17 79 079808AAA 0012 0013 01 10100501 NOX 5.936 3.984 3.9838 0.00 0.000 SCR SCR added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 12.671 11.629 11.6291

cyid 12.671 11.629 11.6291

STID=17 CYID=97 fcid=097190AAC name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 97 097190AAC 0016 0031 02 10100401 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SCR added by LADCO

STID=17 CYID=137 fcid=137805AAA name=AMEREN ENERGY GENERATING CO

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Ye ar Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 137 137805AAA 0003 0003 01 10100 202 NOX 5.356 6.080 6.0798 0.00 0.000 LNB LNB added by LADCOSTID=17 CYID=143 fcid=143805AAG name=AES ED EDWARDS STATION

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 143 143805AAG 0001 0001 01 10100202 NOX 3.052 3.464 3.4641 0.00 0.000 lnb LNB added by LADCO

17 143 143805AAG 0001 0003 01 10100202 NOX 6.942 7.880 7.8804 0.00 0.000 lnb LNB added by LADCO

17 143 143805AAG 0002 0004 01 10100202 NOX 2.131 2.419 2.4191 0.00 0.000 lnb LNB added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 12.124 13.764 13.7636

cyid 12.124 13.764 13.7636

STID=17 CYID= 167 fcid=167120AAO name=CITY WATER LIGHT & POWER

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 167 167120AAO 0010 0012 01 10100203 NOX 6.527 7.410 0.0074 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SHUTDOWN added by LADCO

17 167 167120AAO 0010 0013 01 10100203 NOX 2.646 3.004 0.0030 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SHUTDOWN added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 9.173 10.414 0.0104

cyid 9.173 10.414 0.0104

STID=17 CYID=179 fcid=179801AAA name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Contro l EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 179 179801AAA 0018 0029 01 10100203 NOX 22.429 25.462 1.2731 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

17 179 179801 AAA 0018 0031 01 10100203 NOX 38.993 44.265 2.2132 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

---- -------- ----- --- ---------- fcid 61.422 69.726 3.4863

cyid 61.422 69.726 3.4863

STID=17 CYID=197 fcid=197809AAO name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 197 197809AAO 0032 0033 02 10100604 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.800 SCR SCR added by LADCO

STID=17 CYID=197 fcid=197810AAK name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 197 197810AAK 0011 0016 02 10100222 NOX 5.731 6.506 3.9036 0.00 0.400 SCR SCR added by LADCO

17 197 197810AAK 0 011 0016 03 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.400 SCR SCR added by LADCO

17 197 197810AAK 0013 0010 02 10100223 NOX 8.598 9.760 0.0098 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SCR added by LADCO

17 197 197810AAK 0013 0010 03 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SCR added by LADCO

17 197 197810AAK 0007 0012 02 10100223 NOX 10.974 12.458 0.0125 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SCR added by LADCO

17 197 197810AAK 0007 0012 03 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SCR added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 25.303 28.724 3.9258

cyid 25.303 28.724 3.9258

stid 136.896 152.649 46.2263STID=18 CYID=147 fcid=00020 name=INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER

- ROCKPORT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

18 147 00020 1 001 01 10100222 NOX 23.226 25.291 1.2646 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

18 147 00020 1 001 02 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 23.226 25.291 1.2646

cyid 23.226 25.291 1.2646

stid 23.226 25.291 1.2646

STID=27 CYID=61 fcid=2706100004 name=Minnesota Power Inc

- Boswell Energy Ctr

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

27 61 2706100004 SV003 EU003 001 10100226 NOX 13.661 15.733 3.1466 0.00 0.800 SCR SCR added by LADCO

27 61 2706100004 SV003 EU003 002 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.800 SCR SCR added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 13.661 15.733 3.1466

cyid 13.661 15.733 3.1466

STID=27 CYID=109 fcid=2710900011 name=Rochester Public Utilities

- Silver Lake

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

27 109 271090

0011 SV003 EU004 001 10100202 NOX 2.079 2.394 1.4363 0.00 0.400 SNCR SCR added by LADCO

---- -------- ----- --- ---------- stid 15.739 18.127 4.5830

STID=39 CYID=1 fcid=0701000007 name="DP&L, J.M. STUART GENERATING STATION"

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day To ns/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

39 1 0701000007 R1 B001 B001P1 10100202 NOX 6.986 7.607 2.5358 0.85 0.950 SCR SCR added by LAD CO

39 1 0701000007 R2 B002 B002P1 10100202 NOX 3.633 3.956 1.3186 0.85 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 1 0701000007 R3 B003 B003P1 10100202 NOX 5.013 5.459 1.8197 0.85 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 1 0701000007 R4 B004 B004P1 10100202 NOX 7.849 8.547 2.8491 0.85 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 23.481 25.570 8.5232

cyid 23.481 25.570 8.5232

STID=39 CYID=31 fcid=0616000000 name=CONESVILLE POWER PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

39 31 0616000000 R4 B004 B004P1 10100212 NOX 20.852 22.706 1.1353 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

STID=39 CYID=167 fcid=0684000000 name=MUSKINGUM RIVER POWER PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year F uture Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

39 167 0684000000 R1 B001 B001P1 10200501 NOX 0.002 0.002 0.0001 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO39 167 0684000000 R2 B002 B002P1 10100201 NOX 5.817 6.334 0.3167 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R2 B002 B002P2 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R3 B003 B003P1 10100201 NOX 7.902 8.604 0.4302 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R3 B003 B003P2 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.00 00 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R4 B004 B004P1 10100203 NOX 7.877 8.578 0.4289 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R4 B004 B004P2 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R6 B006 B006P1 10100202 NOX 3.859 4.202 0.2101 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R6 B006 B006P2 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 25.456 27.720 1.38 60

cyid 25.456 27.720 1.3860

st id 69.789 75.996 11.0445

STID=54 CYID=39 fcid=0006 name=APPALACHIAN POWER

- KANAWHA RIVER PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

54 39 0006 012 001 99 10100202 NOX 4.829 5.258 2.6291 0.00 0.500 SCR Scrubber added by LADCO

54 39 0006 012 002 99 10100202 NOX 4.921 5.359 2.6794 0.00 0.500 SCR Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 9.750 10.617 5.3085

cyid 9.750 10.617 5.3085

stid 9.750 10.617 5.3085

STID=55 CYID=79 fcid=241007690 name=WIS ELECTRIC POWER OAK CREEK STATION

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

55 79 241007690 S13 B25 01 10 100202 NOX 4.755 5.398 3.0766 0.00 0.430 SCR SCR added by LADCO

55 79 241007690 S13 B26 01 10100202 NOX 3.277 3.720 2.1951 0.00 0.410 SCR SCR added by LADCO

55 79 241007690 S14 B27 01 10100212 NOX 3.333 3.784 2.8378 0.00 0.250 SCR SCR added by LADCO

55 79 241007690 S14 B28 01 10100212 NOX 3.384 3.841 2.9191 0.00 0.240 SCR SCR added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 14.749 16.743 11.0285

STID=55 CYID=79 fcid=241007800 name=WIS ELECTRIC POWER VALL EY STATION

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

55 79 241007800 S11 B21 01 10100202 NOX 2.797 3.175 1.4289 0.00 0.550 SCR SCR added by LADCO

55 79 241007800 S11 B22 01 10100202 NOX 2.907 3.300 1.4852 0.00 0.550 SCR SCR added by LADCO

55 79 241007800 S12 B23 01 10100202 NOX 2.327 2.642 1.1887 0.00 0.550 SCR SCR added by LADCO

55 79 241007800 S12 B24 01 10100202 NOX 2.343 2.659 1.1967 0.00 0.550 SCR SCR added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 10.374 11.777 5.2 995

cyid 25.123 28.519 16.3281

STID=55 CYID=117 fcid=460033090 name=WP & L Alliant Energy

- Edgewater Gen Station

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

55 117 460033090 S11 B23 01 10100203 NOX 1.620 1.839 1.103 2 0.00 0.400 SCR SCR added by LADCO55 117 460033090 S11 B24 01 10100203 NOX 4.107 4.662 3.8232 0.00 0.180 SCR SCR added by LADCO

5 5 117 460033090 S12 B25 01 10100221 NOX 5.680 6.448 5.4811 0.00 0.150 SCR SCR added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 11.407 12.949 10.4074

cyid 11.407 12.949 10.4074

stid 36.530 41.469 26.735 5

======== ======== ==========

291.931 324.149 95.1624SO2

– 2009

Point Source Grown and Controlled Emissions by facility for SO2 r6s1b_2009 1

Base Year = 2002

Future Year = 2009

STID=19 CYID=115 fcid=58

- 07

- 001 name=MIDAMERICAN ENERGY CO.

- LOUISA STATION

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Cont rol EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

19 115 58

- 07

- 001 117487 147281 99 10100222 SO2 33.664 34.774 3.4774 0.0 0.90 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=21 CYID=161 fc

id=2116100009 name=EAST KY POWER COOP

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

21 161 2116100009 1 001 99 10100202 SO2 42.166 42.103 4.2103 0.0 0.90 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

21 161 2116100009 2 002 99 10100212 SO2 55.385 55.303 5.5303 0.0 0.90 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 97.551 97.406 9.7406

cyid 97.551 97.406 9.7406

stid 9 7.551 97.406 9.7406

STID=27 CYID=141 fcid=2714100004 name=NSP

- Sherburne Generating Plant

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

27 141 271410

0004 SV001 EU001 001 10100222 SO2 16.765 16.987 3.6401 0.3 0.85 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

27 141 2714100004 SV001 EU002 001 10100222 SO2 22.549 22. 848 4.8959 0.3 0.85 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 39.314 39.834 8.5360

cyid 39.314 39.834 8.5360

stid 39.314 39.834 8.5360

STID=54 CYID=51 fcid= 0005 name=OHIO POWER

- MITCHELL PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

54 51 0005 012 001 99 10100202 SO2 17.775 17.748 1.7748 0.0 0.90 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

54 51 0005 012 002 99 10100202 SO2 5.689 5.680 0.5680 0.0 0.90 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 23.463 23.428 2.3428

cyid 23.463 23.428 2.3428

STID=54 CYID=53 fcid=0009 name=APPALACHIAN POWER

- MOUNTAINEER PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

54 53 0009 001 001 99 10100202 SO2 11.196 11.179 1.1179 0.0 0.90 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=54 CYID=79 fcid= 0006 name=APPALACHIAN POWER

- JOHN E AMOS PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes54 79 0006 012 001 99 10100202 SO2 79.635 79.516 7.9516 0.0 0.90 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

54 79 0006 003 003 99 10100202 SO2 139.377 139.169 13.9169 0.0 0.90 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 219.012 218.685 21.8685

cyid 219.012 218.685 21.8685

stid 253.671 253.293 25.3293

======== ======== ==========

424.200 425.307 47.0832SO2

– 2012

Point Source Grown and Controlled Emissions by facility for SO2 r6s1b_2012 1

Base Year = 2002

Future Year = 2012

STID=17 CYID=31 fcid=031600AMI name=MIDWEST GENERATION L LC

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day To ns/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 31 031600AMI 0007 0010 01 10100226 SO2 16.13 18.39 1.839 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

ST ID=17 CYID=97 fcid=097190AAC name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 97 097190AAC 0018 0033 01 10100226 SO2 24.14 27.52 2.752 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

17 97 097190AAC 0021 0036 01 10100226 SO2 19.23 21.92 2.192 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

17 97 09719

0AAC 0016 0031 01 10100203 SO2 4.59 5.24 0.005 0.0 0.999 SHUTDOWN Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 47.96 54.68 4.950

cyid 47.96 54.68 4.950

STID=17 CYID=125 fcid=125804AAB name=DYNEGY MIDWEST GENERATION INC

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 125 125804AAB 0019 0023 01 10100202 SO2 22.34 25.47 3.821 0.0 0.850 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=17 CYID=127 fcid=127855AAC name=ELECTRIC ENERGY INC

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/D ay Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 127 127855AAC 0001 0001 01 10100222 SO2 11.83 13.48 13.482 0.0 0.000 LNB LNB added by LADCO

17 127 127855AAC 0001 0002 01 10100222 SO2 11.48 13.09 13.085 0.0 0.000 LNB LNB added by LADCO

17 127 127855AAC 0002 0003 01 10100222 SO2 10.25 11.68 11.680 0.0 0.000 LNB LNB added by LADCO

17 127 127855AAC 0002 0004 01 10100222 SO2 12.04 13.73 13.731 0.0 0.000 LNB LNB added by LADCO

17 127 127855AAC 0003 0006 01 10100222 SO2 12.68 14.46 14.456 0.0 0.000 LNB LNB added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 58.27 66.43 66.435

cyid 58.27 66.43 66.435

STID=17 CYID=135 fcid=135803AAA name=AMEREN ENERGY GENERATING C O

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Ton s/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 135 135803AAA 0001 0001 01 10100203 SO2 32.99 37.61 3.761 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

17 135 135803AAA 0001 0003 01 10100203 SO2 72.92 83.13 8.313 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 105.91 120.74 12.074

cyid 105.91 120.74 12.074STID=17 CYID=157 fcid=157851AAA name=DYNEGY MIDWEST GENERATION INC

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 157 157851AAA 0001 0001 01 10100203 SO2 25.14 28.66 4.299 0.0 0.850 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

17 157 157851AAA 0002 00 02 01 10100203 SO2 25.79 29.41 4.411 0.0 0.850 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

17 157 157851AAA 0013 0013 01 10100202 SO2 27.79 31.68 4.752 0.0 0.850 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 78.72 89.75 13.462

cyid 78.72 89.75 13.462

STID=17 CYID=167 fcid=167120AAO name=CITY WATER LIGHT & POWER

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 167 167120AAO 0010 0012 01 10100203 SO2 4 4.20 50.39 0.050 0.0 0.999 SHUTDOWN Scrubber added by LADCO

17 167 167120AAO 0010 0013 01 10100203 SO2 16.40 18.70 0.019 0.0 0.999 SHUTDOWN Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 60.61 69.10 0.06 9

cyid 60.61 69.10 0.069

STID=17 CYID=179 fcid=179801AAA name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid p rid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 179 179801AAA 0018 0029 01 10100203 SO2 25.35 28.90 2.890 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

17 179 179801AAA 0018 0031 01 10100203 SO2 41.57 47.39 4.739 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 66.91 76.29 7.629

cyid 66.91 76.29 7.629

STID=17 CYID=197 fcid=197810AAK name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Ton s/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 197 197810AAK 0013 0010 03 10100501 SO2 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.0 0.999 SHUTDOWN Scrubber added by LADCO

17 197 197810AAK 0007 0012 02 10100223 SO2 15.33 17.48 0.017 0.0 0.999 SHUTDOWN Scrubber added by LADCO

17 197 197810AAK 0007 0012 03 101 00501 SO2 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.0 0.999 SHUTDOWN Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 15.33 17.48 0.017

cyid 15.33 17.48 0.017

stid 472.19 538.32 110.295

STID=19 CYID=115 fcid=58

- 07

- 001 name=MIDAMERICAN ENERGY CO.

- LOUISA STATION

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYI D fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

19 115 58

- 07

- 001 117487 147281 99 10100222 SO2 33.66 38.38 3.838 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=21 CYID=161 fcid=2116100009 name=EAST KY POWER COOP

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes21 161 2116100009 1 001 99 10100202 SO2 42.17 44.03 4.403 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

21 161 2116100009 2 002 99 10100212 SO2 55.39 57.84 5.784 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 97.55 101.87 10.187

cyid 97.55 101.87 10.187

stid 97.55 101.87 10.187

STID=27 CYID=61 fcid=27 06100004 name=Minnesota Power Inc

- Boswell Energy Ctr

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

27 61 2706100004 SV003 EU003 001 10100226 SO2 33.99 35.19 15.081 0.3 0.700 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

27 61 2706100004 SV003 EU003 002 10100501 SO2 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.3 0.700 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 33.99 35.19 15.081

cyid 33.99 35.19 15.081

STID=27 CYID=109 fcid=2710900011 name=Rochester Pu blic Utilities

- Silver Lake

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid T ons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

27 109 2710900011 SV003 EU004 001 10100202 SO2 7.86 8.13 1.220 0.0 0.850 SCRUBBER S crubber added by LADCO

STID=27 CYID=141 fcid=2714100004 name=NSP

- Sherburne Generating Plant

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID f

cid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

27 141 2714100004 SV001 EU001 001 10100222 SO2 16.76 17.36 3.719 0.3 0.850 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

27 141 2714100004 SV001 EU002 001 10100222 SO2 22.55 23.34 5.002 0.3 0.850 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 39.31 40.70 8.721

cyid 39.31 40.70 8.721

stid 81.16 84.02 25.023

STID=39 CYID=13 fcid=0607130015 name=R. E. BURGER PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Cont rol EF ctrltype ctrldes

39 13 0607130015 R6 B011 B011P1 10100202 SO2 29.83 31.15 3.115 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

39 13 0607130015 R7 B012 B012P1 10100202 SO2 34.77 36.31 3.631 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 64.60 67.46 6.746

cyid 64.60 67.46 6.746

STID=39 CYID=31 fcid=0616000000 name=CONESVILLE POWER PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

39 31 0616000000 R4 B004 B004P1 10100212 SO2 316.00 330.00 33.000 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- stid 380.60 397.46 39.746

STID=47 CYID=1 fcid=0009 name=TVA BULL RUN FOSSIL PLANTBase Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Da y Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

47 1 0009 S

- 1 001 99 10100212 SO2 130.81 133.01 13.301 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubbe r added by LADCO

STID=47 CYID=73 fcid=0007 name=TVA JOHN SEVIER FOSSIL PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stk id dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

47 73 0007 S

- 1A 001 99 10100212 SO2 20.15 20.49 2.0 49 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 73 0007 S

- 1B 002 99 10100212 SO2 20.25 20.59 2.059 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 73 0007 S

- 2A 003 99 10100212 SO2 19.62 19.95 1.995 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 73 0007 S

- 2B 004 99 10100212 SO2 18.93 19.25 1.925 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 78.95 80.28 8.028

cyid 78.95 80.2 8 8.028

STID=47 CYID=85 fcid=0011 name=TVA JOHNSONVILLE FOSSIL PLANT

Base Yr Grown Contr olled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

47 85 0011 S1

- 01 001 99 10100212 SO2 17.06 17.35 1.735 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 85 0011 S1

- 04 004 99 10100212 SO2 19.85 20.18 2.018 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 85 0011 S1

- 05 005 99 10100212 SO2 24.11 24.52 2.452 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 61.02 62.04 6.204

cyid 61.02 62.04 6.204

STID=47 CYID=145 fcid=0013 name =TVA KINGSTON FOSSIL PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Ton s/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

47 145 0013 S

- 1 001 99 10100202 SO2 12.68 12.89 1.289 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scr ubber added by LADCO

47 145 0013 S

- 1 002 99 10100202 SO2 14.00 14.24 1.424 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 145 0013 S

- 1 003 9 9 10100202 SO2 13.80 14.04 1.404 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 145 0013 S

- 1 004 99 10100202 SO2 12.24 12.44 1.244 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 145 0013 S

- 1 005 99 10100202 SO2 19.57 19.90 1.990 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 145 0013 S

- 2 006 99 10100202 SO2 18.92 19.24 1.924 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 145 0013 S

- 2 007 99 10100202 SO2 21.30 21.66 2.166 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 145 0013 S

- 2 008 99 10100202 SO2 18.54 18.85 1.885 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBE R Scrubber added by LADCO

47 145 0013 S

- 2 009 99 10100202 SO2 20.72 21.07 2.107 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 151.77 154.33 15.433

cyid 151.77 154.33 15.433

STID=47 CYID=165 fcid=0025 name=TVA GALLATIN FOSSIL PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Cont rol EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

47 165 0025 S

- 01 001 99 10100212 SO2 13.91 14.14 1.414 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 165 00

25 S

- 01 002 99 10100212 SO2 14.87 15.12 1.512 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 165 0025 S

- 02 003 99 10100212 SO2 16.33 16.60 1.660 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 165 0025 S

- 02 004 99 10100212 SO2 20.39 20.73 2.073 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Sc rubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------fcid 65.49 66.59 6.659

cyid 65.49 66.59 6.659

stid 488.04 496.25 49.625

STID=54 CYID=51 fcid=0005 name=OHIO POWER

- MITCHELL PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

54 51 0005 012 001 99 10100202 SO2 17.77 18.56 1.856 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

54 51 0005 012 002 99 10100202 SO2 5.69 5.94 0.594 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- --- ----- ---------- fcid 23.46 24.50 2.450

cyid 23.46 24.50 2.450

STID=54 CYID=53 fcid=0009 name=APPALACHIAN POWER

- MOUNTAINEER PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

54 53 0009 001 001 99 10100202 SO2 11.20 11.69 1.169 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=54 CYID=79 fcid=0006 name=APPALACHIAN POWER

- JOHN E A MOS PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

54 79 0006 012 001 99 10100202 SO2 79.63 83.16 8.316 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LA DCO

54 79 0006 012 002 99 10100202 SO2 100.33 104.78 10.478 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

54 79 0006 003 003 99 10100202 SO2 139.38 145.55 14.555 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 319.35 333.50 33.350

cyid 319.35 3 33.50 33.350

stid 354.00 369.69 36.969

STID=55 CYID=79 fcid=241007690 name=WIS ELECTRIC POWER OAK CREEK STATION

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

55 79 241007690 S13 B25 01 10100202 SO2 12.75 14.5 4 3.490 0.0 0.760 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

55 79 241007690 S13 B26 01 10100202 SO2 8.68 9.89 2.473 0.0 0.750 SCRUBBER Scrubber add ed by LADCO

55 79 241007690 S14 B27 01 10100212 SO2 10.97 12.51 2.876 0.0 0.770 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

55 79 241007690 S14 B28 01 10100212 SO2 11.28 12.86 2.958 0.0 0.770 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 43.68 49.80 11.797

cyid 43.6 8 49.80 11.797

stid 43.68 49.80 11.797

======== ======== ==========

1950.90 2075.80 287.480SO2

– 2018

Point Source Grown and Controlled Emissions by facility for SO2 r6s1b_2018 1

Base Year = 2002

Future Year = 2018

STID=17 CYID=31 fcid=031600AIN name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 31 031600AIN 0010 0013 01 10100226 SO2 10.92 12.39 1.239 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

17 31 031600AIN 0012 0016 01 10100226 SO2 17.69 20.08 2.008 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 28.61 32.48 3.248

STID=17 CYID=31 fcid=031600AMI name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 31 031600AMI 0007 0010 01 10100226 SO2 16.13 18.31 1.831 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- cyid 44.74 50.79 5.079

STID=17 CYID =79 fcid=079808AAA name=AMEREN ENERGY GENERATING CO

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 79 079808AAA 0003 0003 01 10100202 SO2 36.35 41.27 4.127 0.0 0. 900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

17 79 079808AAA 0012 0013 01 10100501 SO2 28.99 19.46 1.946 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 65.34 60.72 6.072

cyid 65.34 60.72 6.072

STID=17 CYID=97 fcid=097190AAC name=MIDWEST GENERATIO N LLC

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 97 097190AAC 0018 0033 01 10100226 SO2 24.14 27.40 2.740 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

17 97 097190AAC 0021 0036 01 10100226 SO2 19.23 21.83 2.183 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

17 97 097190AAC 0016 0031 01 10100203 SO2 4.59 5.22 0.005 0.0 0.999 SHUTDOWN Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 47.96 54.45 4.928

cyid 47.96 54.4 5 4.928

STID=17 CYID=125 fcid=125804AAB name=DYNEGY MIDWEST GENERATION INC

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 125 125804AAB 0019 0023 01 10100202 SO2 22.34 25.36 3.805 0.0 0.850 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=17 CYID=127 fcid=127855AAC name=ELECTRIC ENERGY INC

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes17 127 127855AAC 0002 0003 01 10100222 SO2 10.25 11.63 11.630 0.0 0.000 LNB LNB added by LADCO

17 127 127855AAC 0002 0004 01 10100222 SO2 12.04 13.67 13.673 0.0 0.000 LNB LNB added by LADCO

17 127 127855AAC 0001 0001 01 10100222 SO2 11.83 13.42 1.342 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

17 127 127855AAC 0001 0002 01 10100222 SO2 11.48 13.03 1.303 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

17 127 1 27855AAC 0003 0005 01 10100222 SO2 11.72 13.31 1.331 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

17 127 127855AAC 0003 0006 01 10100222 SO2 12.68 14.39 1.439 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 70.00 79.46 30.719

cyid 70.00 79.46 30.719

STID=17 CYID=135 fcid=135803AAA name=AMEREN ENERGY GENERATING CO

Base Yr Grown Controlled Bas e Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 135 135803AAA 0001 0001 01 10100203 SO2 32.99 37.45 3.745 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

17 135 135803AAA 0001 0003 01 10100203 SO2 72.92 82.77 8.277 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 10 5.91 120.22 12.022

cyid 105.91 120.22 12.022

STID=17 CYID=143 fcid=143805AAG name=AES ED EDWARDS STATION

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 143 143805AAG 0002 0004 01 10100202 SO2 15.28 17.34 1.734 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=17 CYID=157 fcid=157851AAA name=DYNEGY MIDWEST GENERATION INC

Base Yr Grown C ontrolled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 157 157851AAA 0001 0001 01 10100203 SO2 25.14 28.54 4.281 0.0 0.850 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

17 157 157851AAA 0002 0002 01 10100203 SO2 25.79 29.28 4.3 92 0.0 0.850 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

17 157 157851AAA 0013 0013 01 10100202 SO2 27.79 31.54 4.732 0.0 0.850 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 78.72 89.36 13.404

cyid 78.72 89.36 13.404

STID=17 CYID=167 fcid=16712 0AAO name=CITY WATER LIGHT & POWER

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc poli d Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 167 167120AAO 0010 0012 01 10100203 SO2 44.20 50.18 0.050 0.0 0.999 SHUTDOW N Scrubber added by LADCO

17 167 167120AAO 0010 0013 01 10100203 SO2 16.40 18.62 0.019 0.0 0.999 SHUTDOWN Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 60.61 68.80 0.069

cyid 60.61 68.80 0.069

STID=17 CYID=179 fcid=179801AAA name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Co ntrol EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 179 179801AAA 0018 0029 01 10100203 SO2 25.35 28.77 2.877 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

17 179 179801AAA 0018 0031 01 10100203 SO2 41.57 47.19 4.719 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- ------- - -------- ----------fcid 66.91 75.96 7.596

cyid 66.91 75.96 7.596

STID=17 CYID=197 fcid=197809AAO name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 197 197809AAO 0006 0009 01 10100203 SO2 15.89 18.04 1.804 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

17 197 197809AAO 0016 0031 01 1 0100202 SO2 27.43 31.13 3.113 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

17 197 197809AAO 0017 0033 01 10100202 SO2 23.13 26.26 2.626 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 66.45 75.44 7.544

STID=17 CYID=197 fcid=197810AAK name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 197 197810AAK 0009 0014 02 10100222 SO2 11.64 13.21 1.321 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

17 197 197810AAK 0011 0016 02 10100222 SO2 25.67 29.14 2.914 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

17 197 197810AAK 0013 0010 03 10100501 SO2 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.0 0.999 SHUTDOWN Scrubber added by LADCO

17 197 197810AAK 0007 0012 02 10100223 SO2 15.33 17.40 0.017 0.0 0.999 SHUTDOWN Scrubber added by LADCO

17 197 197810AAK 0007 0012 03 101005 01 SO2 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.0 0.999 SHUTDOWN Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 52.64 59.75 4.252

cyid 119.09 135.19 11.796

stid 696.90 777.66 97.225

STID=18 CYID=147 fcid=00020 name=INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER

- ROCKPORT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

18 147 00020 1 001 01 10100222 SO2 66.42 72.32 7.232 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

18 147 00020 1 001 02 10100501 SO2 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 66.42 72.32 7.232

cyid 66.42 72.32 7.232

stid 66.42 72.32 7.232

STID=19 CYID=115 fcid=58

- 07

- 001 name=MIDAMERICAN ENERGY CO.

- LOUISA STATION

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

19 115 58

- 07

- 001 117487 147281 99 10100222 SO2 33.66 38.22 3.822 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=21 CYID=127 fcid =2112700003 name=KENTUCKY POWER CO

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc poli d Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

21 127 2112700003 2 002 99 10100202 SO2 104.52 113.82 11.382 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBE R Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=21 CYID=161 fcid=2116100009 name=EAST KY POWER COOP

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes21 161 2116100009 1 001 99 10100202 SO2 42.17 45.92 4.592 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

21 161 2116100009 2 002 99 10100212 SO2 55.39 60.31 6.031 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 97.55 106.23 10.623

cyid 97.55 106.23 10.623

stid 202.07 220.04 22.004

STID=27 CYID=61 fcid=2706100004 name=Minnesota Power Inc

- Boswell Energy Ctr

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Cont rol EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

27 61 2706100004 SV003 EU003 001 10100226 SO2 33.99 39.15 16.778 0.3 0.700 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

27 61 27

06100004 SV003 EU003 002 10100501 SO2 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.3 0.700 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 33.99 39.15 16.778

cyid 33.99 39.15 16.778

STID=27 CYID=109 fcid=2710900011 name=Rochester Public Utilities

- Silver Lake

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF c trltype ctrldes

27 109 2710900011 SV003 EU004 001 10100202 SO2 7.86 9.05 1.357 0.0 0.850 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=27 CYID=141 fcid=2714100004 name=NSP

- Sherburne Generating Plant

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid To ns/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

27 141 2714100004 SV001 EU001 001 10100222 SO2 16.76 19.31 4.138 0.3 0.850 SCRUBBER Sc rubber added by LADCO

27 141 2714100004 SV001 EU002 001 10100222 SO2 22.55 25.97 5.565 0.3 0.850 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 39.31 45.28 9.703

cyid 39.31 45.28 9.703

stid 81.16 93.48 27.838

STID=39 CYID=13 fcid=0607130015 name=R. E. BURGER PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

39 13 0607130015 R6 B011 B011P1 10100202 SO2 29.83 32.48 3.248 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

39 13 0607130015 R7 B012 B012P1 10100202 SO2 34.77 37. 86 3.786 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 64.60 70.34 7.034

cyid 64.60 70.34 7.034

STID=39 CYID=31 fcid=0616000000 name=CONESVILLE POWER PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Futur e Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

39 31 0616000000 R4 B004 B004P1 10100212 SO2 316.00 344.11 34.411 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=39 CYID=167 fcid=0684000000 name=MUSKINGUM RIVER POWER PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes39 167 0684000000 R2 B002 B002P1 10100201 SO2 65.07 70.85 7.085 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R2 B002 B002P2 10100501 SO2 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R3 B003 B003P1 10100201 SO2 94.58 103.00 10.300 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBE R Scrubber added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R3 B003 B003P2 10100501 SO2 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R4 B00 4 B004P1 10100203 SO2 81.64 88.90 8.890 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R4 B004 B004P2 10100501 SO2 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R5 B005 B005P1 10100203 SO2 97.22 105.87 10.587 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

3 9 167 0684000000 R5 B005 B005P2 10100501 SO2 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R6 B006 B006P1 10100202 SO 2 113.96 124.10 12.410 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R6 B006 B006P2 10100501 SO2 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 452.48 492.72 49.272

cyid 452.48 492.72 49.272

stid 833.08 907.16 90.716

STID=47 CYID=1 fcid=0009 name=TVA BULL RUN FOSSIL PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

47 1 0009 S

- 1 001 99 10100212 SO2 130.81 136.82 13.682 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=47 CY ID=73 fcid=0007 name=TVA JOHN SEVIER FOSSIL PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

47 73 0007 S

- 1A 001 99 10100212 SO2 20.15 21.07 2.107 0.0 0.90 0 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 73 0007 S

- 1B 002 99 10100212 SO2 20.25 21.18 2.118 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 73 0007 S

- 2A 003 99 10100212 SO2 19.62 20.52 2.052 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 73 0007 S

- 2B 004 99 10100212 SO2 18.93 19.8 0 1.980 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 78.95 82.57 8.257

cyid 78.95 82.57 8.257

STID=47 CYID=85 fcid=0011 name=TVA JOHNSONVILLE FOSSIL PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Futur e Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

47 85 0011 S1

- 01 001 99 10100212 SO2 17.06 17.84 1.784 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 85 0011 S1

- 04 004 99 10100212 SO2 19.85 20.76 2.076 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 85 0011 S1

- 05 005 99 10100212 SO2 24.11 25.22 2.522 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 61.02 63.82 6.382

cyid 61.02 63.82 6.382

STID=47 CYID=145 fcid=0013 name=TVA KINGSTON FOSSIL PLAN T

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Ton s/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

47 145 0013 S

- 1 001 99 10100202 SO2 12.68 13.26 1.326 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 145 0013 S

- 1 002 99 10100202 SO2 14.00 14.65 1.465 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO47 145 0013 S

- 1 003 99 10100202 SO2 13.80 14.44 1.444 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 145 0013 S

- 1 004 99 10100202 SO2 12.24 12.80 1.280 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 145 0013 S

- 1 005 99 10100202 SO2 19.57 20.47 2.047 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 145 0013 S

- 2 006 99 10100202 SO2 18.92 19.79 1.979 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 145 0013 S

- 2 007 99 10100202 SO2 21.30 22.28 2.228 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 145 0013 S

- 2 008 99 10100202 SO2 18.54 19.39 1.939 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LA DCO

47 145 0013 S

- 2 009 99 10100202 SO2 20.72 21.68 2.168 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 151.77 158.75 15.875

cyid 151.77 158.75 15.875

STID=47 CYID=165 fcid=0025 name=TVA GALLATIN FOSSIL PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

47 165 0025 S

- 01 001 99 10100212 SO2 13.91 14.54 1.454 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 165 0025 S

- 01 002 99 10100212 SO2 14.87 15.56 1.556 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 165 0025 S

- 02 003 99 10100212 SO2 16.33 17.08 1.708 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 165 0025 S

- 02 004 99 10100212 SO2 20.39 21.32 2.132 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

--- - -------- -------- ---------- fcid 65.49 68.50 6.850

cyid 65.49 68.50 6.850

stid 488.04 510.46 51.046

STID=54 CYID=39 fcid=0006 name=APPALACHIAN POWER

- KANAWHA RIVER PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

54 39 0006 012 001 99 10100202 SO2 19.45 21.18 10.591 0.0 0.500 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

54 39 0006 012 002 99 10100202 SO2 20.94 22.80 11.399 0.0 0.500 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- --- ------- fcid 40.39 43.98 21.990

cyid 40.39 43.98 21.990

STID=54 CYID=51 fcid=0005 name=OHIO POWER

- MITCHELL PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

54 51 0005 012 001 99 10100202 SO2 17.77 19.36 1.936 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

54 51 0005 012 002 99 10100202 SO2 5.69 6.19 0.619 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 23.46 25.55 2.555

STID=54 CYID=51 fcid=0006 name=OHIO POWER

- KAMMER PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

54 51 0006 013 001 99 10100203 SO2 47.06 51.25 5.125 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

54 51 0006 013 002 99 10100203 SO2 47.66 51.90 5.190 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

54 51 0006 013 003 99 10100203 SO2 41.94 45.67 4.567 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 136.67 148.82 14.882

cyid 160.13 174.37 17.437

STID=54 CYID=53 fcid=0001 name=APPALACHIAN POWER CO.

- PHILIP SPORN PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID C YID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

54 53 0001 014 001 99 10100202 SO2 18.6 5 20.31 2.031 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

54 53 0001 014 002 99 10100202 SO2 15.87 17.28 1.728 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

54 53 0001 014 003 99 10100202 SO2 21.46 23.36 2.336 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

54 53 0001 014 004 99 10100202 SO2 20.53 22.36 2.236 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

54 53 0001 005 005 99 10100202 SO2 46.82 50.98 5.098 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 123.33 134.30 13.430

STID=54 CYID=53 fcid=0009 name=APPALACHIAN POWER

- MOUNTAINEER PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

54 53 0009 001 001 99 10100202 SO2 11.20 12.19 1.219 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- --- ----- -------- ---------- cyid 134.53 146.49 14.649

STID=54 CYID=79 fcid=0006 name=APPALACH IAN POWER

- JOHN E AMOS PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

54 79 0006 012 001 99 10100202 SO2 79.63 86.72 8.672 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

54 79 0006 012 002 99 10100202 SO2 100.33 109.26 10.926 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

54 79 0006 003 003 99 10100202 SO2 139.38 151.77 15.177 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 319.35 347.75 34.775

cyid 319.35 347.75 34.775

stid 654.39 712.59 88.851

STID=55 CYID=79 fcid=241007690 name=WIS ELECTRIC POWER OAK CREEK STATION

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

55 79 241007690 S13 B25 01 10100202 SO2 12.75 14.48 3.475 0.0 0.760 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

55 79 241007690 S13 B26 01 10100202 SO2 8.68 9.85 2.462 0.0 0.750 SCR UBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

55 79 241007690 S14 B27 01 10100212 SO2 10.97 12.45 2.864 0.0 0.770 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

55 79 241007690 S14 B28 01 10100212 SO2 11.28 12.81 2.945 0.0 0.770 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ------ ---- fcid 43.68 49.59 11.746

cyid 43.68 49.59 11.746

stid 43.68 49.59 11.746

======== ======== ==========

3099.41 3 381.52 400.481

# Appendix II

Scenario C Controls (CAMD List)

### 1 

## NOx Controls (SCRs , 2007

– 2013) )

Plant Name UniqueID_Final State Name County Capacity

MW On Line

Year SCR

Online

Year

Chesterfield 3797_B_4 Virginia Chesterfield 166 1960 2013

Chesterfield 3797_B_5 Virginia Chesterfield 310 1964 2012

Scherer 6257_B_3 Georgia Monroe 875 1987 2011

Chesterfield 3797_B_6 Virginia Chesterfield 658 1969 2011

Sandow No 4 6648_B_4 Texas Milam 545 1981 2011

Beech Hollow Power Project 82704_B_1 Pennsylvania Washington 272 2011 2011

Longview Power 82702_B_1 West Virginia Monongalia 695 201 1 2011

Cliffside 2721_B_6 North Carolina Cleveland 800 2011 2011

AES Westover 2526_B_11 New York Broome 22 1943 2010

AES Westover 2526_B_12 New York Broome 22 1943 2010

AES Westover 2526_B_13 New York Broome 84 1951 2010

Iatan 2 6065_B_2 Missouri Plat te 850 2010 2010

Southwest 6195_B_2 Missouri Greene 300 2010 2010

Trimble Station (LGE) 6071_B_2 Kentucky Trimble 732 2010 2010

Elm Road Generating Station 56068_B_2 Wisconsin Milwaukee 615 2010 2010

Clay Boswell 1893_B_3 Minnesota Itasca 350 1973 2009

Asheville 2706_B_2 North Carolina Buncombe 184 1971 2009

Conesville 2840_B_4 Ohio Coshocton 780 1973 2009

Marshall 2727_B_3 North Carolina Catawba 657 1969 2009

St Johns River Power Park 207_B_1 Florida Duval 626 1987 2009

Ghent 1356_B_2 Kentucky Car roll 469 1977 2009

Chalk Point LLC 1571_B_1 Maryland Prince George's 341 1964 2009

Chalk Point LLC 1571_B_2 Maryland Prince George's 342 1965 2009

San Juan 2451_B_2 New Mexico San Juan 320 1973 2009

Big Bend 645_B_BB01 Florida Hillsborough 411 1970 200 9

Big Bend 645_B_BB02 Florida Hillsborough 391 1973 2009

Big Bend 645_B_BB03 Florida Hillsborough 414 1976 2009

Nebraska City Unit 2 6096_B_2 Nebraska Otoe 663 2009 2009

Cross 130_B_4 South Carolina Berkeley 652 2009 2009

Springerville 8223_B_4 Arizon a Apache 400 2009 2009

Sandow 5 82010_B_5 Texas Milam 600 2009 2009

Oak Grove 82011_B_1 Texas Robertson 800 2009 2009

Oak Grove 82011_B_2 Texas Robertson 800 2009 2009

TS Power Plant 82013_B_1 Nevada Eureka 200 2009 2009

Plum Point Energy 82014_B_1 Ar kansas Mississippi 665 2009 2009

Comanche 470_B_3 Colorado Pueblo 750 2009 2009

Elm Road Generating Station 56068_B_1 Wisconsin Milwaukee 615 2009 2009

Two Elk Generating Station 55360_B_1 Wyoming Campbell 300 2009 2009

J K Spruce 7097_B_BLR2 Texas Bex ar 750 2009 2009

Dallman 963_B_34 Illinois Sangamon 200 2009 2009

AES Greenidge LLC 2527_B_4 New York Yates 27 1950 2008

AES Greenidge LLC 2527_B_5 New York Yates 27 1950 2008

AES Greenidge LLC 2527_B_6 New York Yates 106 1953 2008

Charles R Lowman 56 _B_2 Alabama Washington 238 1979 2008

Charles R Lowman 56_B_3 Alabama Washington 238 1980 2008

Barry 3_B_5 Alabama Mobile 750 1971 2008

St Johns River Power Park 207_B_2 Florida Duval 626 1988 2008

Morgantown Generating Plant 1573_B_2 Maryland Charles 620 1971 2008

### 2

Bailly 995_B_7 Indiana Porter 160 1962 2008

San Juan 2451_B_1 New Mexico San Juan 322 1976 2008

San Juan 2451_B_3 New Mexico San Juan 495 1979 2008

Weston 4078_B_4 Wisconsin Marathon 519 2008 2008

AES Deepwater 10670_B_AAB001 Texas Harri s 140 1986 2007

La Cygne 1241_B_1 Kansas Linn 724 1973 2007

Morgantown Generating Plant 1573_B_1 Maryland Charles 624 1970 2007

PSEG Hudson Generating Station 2403_B_2 New Jersey Hudson 583 1967 2007

San Juan 2451_B_4 New Mexico San Juan 506 1982 2007

Big Bend 645_B_BB04 Florida Hillsborough 457 1985 2007

Cross 130_B_3 South Carolina Berkeley 620 2007 2007

Wygen II 55479_B_4 Wyoming Campbell 90 2007 2007

Council Bluffs 1082_B_4 Iowa Pottawattamie 790 2007 2007



## SO2 Controls (FGDs, 2007

– 2012)

Plan t Name UniqueID_Final State Name County Capacity

MW On Line

Year Scrubber

Online

Year

James H Miller Jr 6002_B_1 Alabama Jefferson 684 1978 2011

James H Miller Jr 6002_B_2 Alabama Jefferson 687 1985 2011

James H Miller Jr 6002_B_3 Alabama Jefferson 687 1989 2011

James H Miller Jr 6002_B_4 Alabama Jefferson 688 1991 2011

Cape Fear 2708_B_5 North Carolina Chatham 143 1956 2011

Baldwin Energy Complex 889_B_1 Illinois Randolph 624 1970 2011

Baldwin Energy Complex 889_B_2 Illinois Randolph 629 1973 2011

Baldwin Energy Complex 889_B_3 Illinois Randolph 629 1975 2011

Scherer 6257_B_3 Georgia Monroe 875 1987 2011

Milton R Young 2823_B_B1 North Dakota Oliver 250 1970 2011

W H Sammis 2866_B_6 Ohio Jefferson 630 1969 2011

W H Sammis 2866_B_7 Ohio Jefferson 630 1971 2011

PSEG Hudson Generating Station 2403_B_2 New Jersey Hudson 583 1967 2011

John Sevier 3405_B_1 Tennessee Hawkins 176 1955 2011

John Sevier 3405_B_2 Tennessee Hawkins 176 1955 2011

John Sevier 3405_B_3 Tennessee Hawkins 176 1956 2011

John S evier 3405_B_4 Tennessee Hawkins 176 1957 2011

Beech Hollow Power Project 82704_B_1 Pennsylvania Washington 272 2011 2011

Longview Power 82702_B_1 West Virginia Monongalia 695 2011 2011

Cliffside 2721_B_6 North Carolina Cleveland 800 2011 2011

AES Gree nidge LLC 2527_B_4 New York Yates 27 1950 2010

AES Greenidge LLC 2527_B_5 New York Yates 27 1950 2010

Barry 3_B_5 Alabama Mobile 750 1971 2010

E C Gaston 26_B_5 Alabama Shelby 861 1974 2010

Warrick 6705_B_4 Indiana Warrick 300 1970 2010

Coffeen 861_B_ 01 Illinois Montgomery 340 1965 2010

Coffeen 861_B_02 Illinois Montgomery 560 1972 2010

Cardinal 2828_B_3 Ohio Jefferson 630 1977 2010

Brandon Shores 602_B_1 Maryland Anne Arundel 643 1984 2010

Brandon Shores 602_B_2 Maryland Anne Arundel 643 1991 2010

Monroe 1733_B_4 Michigan Monroe 775 1974 2010

Cliffside 2721_B_5 North Carolina Cleveland 550 1972 2010

Crystal River 628_B_4 Florida Citrus 720 1982 2010

Bowen 703_B_1BLR Georgia Bartow 713 1971 2010

### 3

Crist 641_B_6 Florida Escambia 302 1970 2010

Cri st 641_B_7 Florida Escambia 477 1973 2010

Clifty Creek 983_B_1 Indiana Jefferson 217 1955 2010

Clifty Creek 983_B_2 Indiana Jefferson 217 1955 2010

Clifty Creek 983_B_3 Indiana Jefferson 217 1955 2010

Clifty Creek 983_B_4 Indiana Jefferson 217 1955 201 0

Clifty Creek 983_B_5 Indiana Jefferson 217 1955 2010

Clifty Creek 983_B_6 Indiana Jefferson 217 1956 2010

Chalk Point LLC 1571_B_1 Maryland Prince George's 341 1964 2010

Chalk Point LLC 1571_B_2 Maryland Prince George's 342 1965 2010

Dickerson 1572_ B_1 Maryland Montgomery 182 1959 2010

Dickerson 1572_B_2 Maryland Montgomery 182 1960 2010

Dickerson 1572_B_3 Maryland Montgomery 182 1962 2010

R E Burger 2864_B_7 Ohio Belmont 156 1955 2010

R E Burger 2864_B_8 Ohio Belmont 156 1955 2010

Kyger Creek 2 876_B_1 Ohio Gallia 217 1955 2010

Kyger Creek 2876_B_2 Ohio Gallia 217 1955 2010

Kyger Creek 2876_B_3 Ohio Gallia 217 1955 2010

Kyger Creek 2876_B_4 Ohio Gallia 217 1955 2010

Kyger Creek 2876_B_5 Ohio Gallia 217 1955 2010

Cheswick 8226_B_1 Pennsylvani a Allegheny 580 1970 2010

PSEG Mercer Generating Station 2408_B_1 New Jersey Mercer 315 1960 2010

PSEG Mercer Generating Station 2408_B_2 New Jersey Mercer 310 1961 2010

Silver Lake 2008_B_4 Minnesota Olmsted 61 1969 2010

Kingston 3407_B_1 Tennessee Ro ane 135 1954 2010

Kingston 3407_B_2 Tennessee Roane 135 1954 2010

Kingston 3407_B_3 Tennessee Roane 135 1954 2010

Kingston 3407_B_4 Tennessee Roane 135 1954 2010

Kingston 3407_B_5 Tennessee Roane 177 1955 2010

Kingston 3407_B_6 Tennessee Roane 177 195 5 2010

Kingston 3407_B_7 Tennessee Roane 177 1955 2010

Kingston 3407_B_8 Tennessee Roane 177 1955 2010

Kingston 3407_B_9 Tennessee Roane 178 1955 2010

Sioux 2107_B_1 Missouri St. Charles 497 1967 2010

Sioux 2107_B_2 Missouri St. Charles 497 1968 2010

Chesterfield 3797_B_5 Virginia Chesterfield 310 1964 2010

Yorktown 3809_B_1 Virginia York 159 1957 2010

AES Westover 2526_B_11 New York Broome 22 1943 2010

AES Westover 2526_B_12 New York Broome 22 1943 2010

AES Westover 2526_B_13 New York Broome 84 1 951 2010

Iatan 2 6065_B_2 Missouri Platte 850 2010 2010

Southwest 6195_B_2 Missouri Greene 300 2010 2010

Trimble Station (LGE) 6071_B_2 Kentucky Trimble 732 2010 2010

Elm Road Generating Station 56068_B_2 Wisconsin Milwaukee 615 2010 2010

Cholla 113_B _3 Arizona Navajo 271 1980 2009

Mayo 6250_B_1A North Carolina Person 362 1983 2009

Mayo 6250_B_1B North Carolina Person 362 1983 2009

Conesville 2840_B_4 Ohio Coshocton 780 1973 2009

G G Allen 2718_B_1 North Carolina Gaston 162 1957 2009

G G Allen 271 8_B_2 North Carolina Gaston 162 1957 2009

G G Allen 2718_B_3 North Carolina Gaston 260 1959 2009

### 4

G G Allen 2718_B_4 North Carolina Gaston 275 1960 2009

G G Allen 2718_B_5 North Carolina Gaston 265 1961 2009

H L Spurlock 6041_B_1 Kentucky Mason 315 1977 2009

Crystal River 628_B_5 Florida Citrus 717 1984 2009

Deerhaven Generating Station 663_B_B2 Florida Alachua 228 1981 2009

Bowen 703_B_2BLR Georgia Bartow 718 1972 2009

Wansley 6052_B_2 Georgia Heard 892 1978 2009

E W Brown 1355_B_1 Kentucky Mercer 94 1957 2009

E W Brown 1355_B_2 Kentucky Mercer 160 1963 2009

E W Brown 1355_B_3 Kentucky Mercer 422 1971 2009

Ghent 1356_B_2 Kentucky Carroll 469 1977 2009

Fayette Power Project 6179_B_1 Texas Fayette 598 1979 2009

Fayette Power Project 6179_B_2 Texa s Fayette 598 1980 2009

Morgantown Generating Plant 1573_B_1 Maryland Charles 624 1970 2009

Morgantown Generating Plant 1573_B_2 Maryland Charles 620 1971 2009

PPL Brunner Island 3140_B_1 Pennsylvania York 321 1961 2009

PPL Brunner Island 3140_B_2 Penn sylvania York 378 1965 2009

Keystone 3136_B_1 Pennsylvania Armstrong 850 1967 2009

Keystone 3136_B_2 Pennsylvania Armstrong 850 1968 2009

Bull Run 3396_B_1 Tennessee Anderson 881 1967 2009

Bay Shore 2878_B_4 Ohio Lucas 215 1968 2009

Hatfields Ferry Po wer Station 3179_B_1 Pennsylvania Greene 530 1969 2009

Hatfields Ferry Power Station 3179_B_2 Pennsylvania Greene 530 1970 2009

Hatfields Ferry Power Station 3179_B_3 Pennsylvania Greene 530 1971 2009

Nebraska City Unit 2 6096_B_2 Nebraska Otoe 663 2009 2009

Cross 130_B_4 South Carolina Berkeley 652 2009 2009

Springerville 8223_B_4 Arizona Apache 400 2009 2009

Sandow 5 82010_B_5 Texas Milam 600 2009 2009

Oak Grove 82011_B_1 Texas Robertson 800 2009 2009

Oak Grove 82011_B_2 Texas Robertson 800 2009 2 009

TS Power Plant 82013_B_1 Nevada Eureka 200 2009 2009

Plum Point Energy 82014_B_1 Arkansas Mississippi 665 2009 2009

Comanche 470_B_3 Colorado Pueblo 750 2009 2009

Elm Road Generating Station 56068_B_1 Wisconsin Milwaukee 615 2009 2009

Two Elk Gene rating Station 55360_B_1 Wyoming Campbell 300 2009 2009

J K Spruce 7097_B_BLR2 Texas Bexar 750 2009 2009

Dallman 963_B_34 Illinois Sangamon 200 2009 2009

Charles R Lowman 56_B_1 Alabama Washington 86 1969 2008

John E Amos 3935_B_1 West Virginia Putnam 800 1971 2008

John E Amos 3935_B_2 West Virginia Putnam 800 1972 2008

Cholla 113_B_4 Arizona Navajo 380 1981 2008

Roxboro 2712_B_1 North Carolina Person 369 1966 2008

Roxboro 2712_B_3A North Carolina Person 341 1973 2008

Roxboro 2712_B_3B North Caroli na Person 341 1973 2008

Miami Fort 2832_B_7 Ohio Hamilton 500 1975 2008

Miami Fort 2832_B_8 Ohio Hamilton 500 1978 2008

Cogentrix Virginia Leasing Corp 10071_B_2A Virginia Portsmouth 19 1988 2008

Cogentrix Virginia Leasing Corp 10071_B_2B Virginia Port smouth 19 1988 2008

Cogentrix Virginia Leasing Corp 10071_B_2C Virginia Portsmouth 19 1988 2008

J M Stuart 2850_B_1 Ohio Adams 585 1971 2008

J M Stuart 2850_B_2 Ohio Adams 597 1970 2008

### 5

J M Stuart 2850_B_3 Ohio Adams 597 1972 2008

J M Stuart 2850_B_4 Ohio Adams 597 1974 2008

Monroe 1733_B_3 Michigan Monroe 795 1973 2008

Belews Creek 8042_B_1 North Carolina Stokes 1,115 1974 2008

Belews Creek 8042_B_2 North Carolina Stokes 1,115 1975 2008

Bowen 703_B_3BLR Georgia Bartow 902 1974 2008

Bowen 703_B_4B LR Georgia Bartow 929 1975 2008

Hammond 708_B_1 Georgia Floyd 112 1954 2008

Hammond 708_B_2 Georgia Floyd 112 1954 2008

Hammond 708_B_3 Georgia Floyd 112 1955 2008

Hammond 708_B_4 Georgia Floyd 510 1970 2008

Wansley 6052_B_1 Georgia Heard 891 1976 200 8

Harding Street 990_B_70 Indiana Marion 435 1973 2008

Cogentrix Hopewell 10377_B_1A Virginia Hopewell (city) 18 1987 2008

Cogentrix Hopewell 10377_B_1B Virginia Hopewell (city) 18 1987 2008

Cogentrix Hopewell 10377_B_1C Virginia Hopewell (city) 18 198 7 2008

Ghent 1356_B_4 Kentucky Carroll 478 1984 2008

Council Bluffs 1082_B_3 Iowa Pottawattamie 690 1978 2008

PPL Brunner Island 3140_B_3 Pennsylvania York 749 1969 2008

PPL Montour 3149_B_1 Pennsylvania Montour 774 1972 2008

PPL Montour 3149_B_2 Penn sylvania Montour 766 1973 2008

Comanche 470_B_1 Colorado Pueblo 366 1973 2008

Comanche 470_B_2 Colorado Pueblo 370 1975 2008

Cayuga 1001_B_2 Indiana VermilIon 473 1972 2008

Winyah 6249_B_1 South Carolina Georgetown 295 1975 2008

Winyah 6249_B_2 South Carolina Georgetown 295 1977 2008

Winyah 6249_B_3 South Carolina Georgetown 295 1980 2008

Chesterfield 3797_B_6 Virginia Chesterfield 658 1969 2008

Brayton Point 1619_B_1 Massachusetts Bristo 243 1963 2008

Brayton Point 1619_B_2 Massachusetts Bristo 24 4 1964 2008

Weston 4078_B_4 Wisconsin Marathon 519 2008 2008

Gorgas 8_B_10 Alabama Walker 690 1972 2007

Gorgas 8_B_8 Alabama Walker 165 1956 2007

Gorgas 8_B_9 Alabama Walker 175 1958 2007

John E Amos 3935_B_3 West Virginia Putnam 1,300 1973 2007

Moun taineer 6264_B_1 West Virginia Mason 1,300 1980 2007

Cardinal 2828_B_1 Ohio Jefferson 600 1967 2007

Cardinal 2828_B_2 Ohio Jefferson 600 1967 2007

Roxboro 2712_B_2 North Carolina Person 639 1968 2007

Roxboro 2712_B_4A North Carolina Person 343 1980 200 7

Roxboro 2712_B_4B North Carolina Person 343 1980 2007

Cogentrix Virginia Leasing Corp 10071_B_1A Virginia Portsmouth 19 1988 2007

Cogentrix Virginia Leasing Corp 10071_B_1B Virginia Portsmouth 19 1988 2007

Cogentrix Virginia Leasing Corp 10071_B_1C V irginia Portsmouth 19 1988 2007

Killen Station 6031_B_2 Ohio Adams 615 1982 2007

Marshall 2727_B_2 North Carolina Catawba 378 1966 2007

Marshall 2727_B_3 North Carolina Catawba 657 1969 2007

Cogentrix Hopewell 10377_B_2A Virginia Hopewell (city) 18 198 7 2007

Cogentrix Hopewell 10377_B_2B Virginia Hopewell (city) 18 1987 2007

Cogentrix Hopewell 10377_B_2C Virginia Hopewell (city) 18 1987 2007

Ghent 1356_B_3 Kentucky Carroll 478 1981 2007

### 6

Louisa 6664_B_101 Iowa Louisa 700 1983 2007

Allen S King 1915_ B_1 Minnesota Washington 571 1968 2007

Mitchell 3948_B_1 West Virginia Marshall 800 1971 2007

Gibson 6113_B_1 Indiana Gibson 630 1975 2007

Gibson 6113_B_2 Indiana Gibson 628 1975 2007

Winyah 6249_B_4 South Carolina Georgetown 270 1981 2007

Pleasant Pr airie 6170_B_2 Wisconsin Kenosha 617 1985 2007

Cross 130_B_3 South Carolina Berkeley 620 2007 2007

Wygen II 55479_B_4 Wyoming Campbell 90 2007 2007

Council Bluffs 1082_B_4 Iowa Pottawattamie 790 2007 2007



## Assumed BART Facilities and Units

State County Fac ID Facilit y Name Unit ID

MI Bay B2840 CE

- KARN/WEADOCK EU00036

MI Bay B2840 CE

- KARN/WEADOCK EU00037

MI Eaton B4001 LAN. BW&L ERICKSON EU00007

MI Houghton B6553 UP POWER CO / PORTAGE EU00008

MI Huron B2815 DTE

- HARBOR BEACH EU00009

MI Ingham B2647 LAN. BW&L Eckert RG00023

MI Ingham B2647 LAN. BW&L Eckert RG00023

MI Ingham B2647 LAN. BW&L Eckert RG00023

MI Ingham B2647 LAN. BW&L Moores Park RG00021

MI Marquette B4261 WE

- ENERGIES EU00029

MI Marquette B4261 WE

- ENERGIES EU00030

MI Marq uette B4261 WE

- ENERGIES EU00031

MI Marquette B4261 WE

- ENERGIES EU00032

MI Marquette B4261 WE

- ENERGIES EU00033

MI Monroe B2816 DTE

- MONROE EU00062

MI Monroe B2816 DTE

- MONROE EU00068

MI Monroe B2816 DTE

- MONROE EU00063

MI Monroe B2816 DTE

- MONROE EU00064

MI Ottawa B2835 CE

– CAMPBELL EU00062

MI Ottawa B2835 CE

– CAMPBELL EU00061

MI Saint Clair B2796 DTE

- ST. CLAIR / BELLE RIVER EU00111

MI Saint Clair B6145 DTE

– GREENWOOD EU00009

MI Wayne B2132 WYANDOTTE EU00036

MI Wayne B2185 DET ROIT PLD, MISTERSKY EU00014

MI Wayne B2811 DTE

– TRENTON EU00035

OH Lake 0243160009 CEI., EASTLAKE PLANT B005

OH 0247030013 Orion Power Midwest B012

OH 0285010188 Dept of Public Utilities, City of Orrville B001

OH 0285010188 Dept of Public Utilities, City of Orrville B004

OH 0448020006 Toledo Edison Co., Bay Shore B003

OH 0448020006 Toledo Edison Co., Bay Shor e B004

OH 0616000000 Conesville Power Plant B003

OH 0616000000 Conesville Power Plant B004

OH 0616000000 Conesville Power Pl ant B007

OH 0641050002 Cardinal Power Pl ant B001

OH 0641050002 Cardinal Power Pl ant B002

### 7

OH 0641050002 Cardinal Power Plant B003

OH 0641050002 Cardinal Power Pl ant B004

OH 0641050002 Cardinal Power Pl ant B008

OH 0641050002 Cardinal Power P l ant B009

OH 0641050002 Cardinal Power Plant B009

OH Jefferson 0641160017 W. H. SAMMIS PLANT B011

OH Jefferson 0641160017 W. H. SAMMIS PLANT B012

OH Jefferson 0641160017 W. H. SAMMIS PLANT B013

OH 0684000000 Muskingum River Power Plant B006

OH Ada ms 0701000007 DP&L, J.M. Stuart Generating Station B001

OH Adams 0701000007 DP&L, J.M. Stuart Generating Station B002

OH Adams 0701000007 DP&L, J.M. Stuart Generating Station B003

OH Adams 0701000007 DP&L, J.M. Stuart Generating Station B004

OH 070100 0060 DP&L, Killen Station B001

OH 1409040243 City of Hamilton Dept of Public Utilities B002

OH 1409040243 City of Hamilton Dept of Public Utilities B008

OH 1409040243 City of Hamilton Dept of Public Utilities B009

OH 1413100008 CG&E W. C. BECKJORD B005

OH 1413100008 CG&E W. C. BECKJORD B006

OH 1431350093 CG&E MIAMI FORT STATION B015

IL Peoria 856 Ameren

– Edwards 2

IL Sangamon 963 CWLP

– Dallman 31

IL Sangamon 963 CWLP

– Dallman 32

IL Christian 876 Dominion

– Kincaid 1

IL Christian 87 6 Dominion

– Kincaid 2

WI COLUMBIA 111003090 Alliant En ergy

- Columbia Generating B20

WI COLUMBIA 111003090 Alliant En ergy

- Columbia Generating B21

WI COLUMBIA 111003090 Alliant En ergy

- Columbia Generating B22

WI GRANT 122014530 Alliant Energy, Nelso n Dewey B22 (unit 2)

WI MILWAUKEE 241007690 We Energies

- Oak Creek Station B26 (Unit 6)

WI MILWAUKEE 241007690 We Energies

- Oak Creek Station B27 (Unit 7)

WI MILWAUKEE 241007690 We Energies

- Oak Creek Station B28

WI MILWAUKEE 241007800 We Energies

- Valley Station B21

WI MILWAUKEE 241007800 We Energies

- Valley Station B23

WI MILWAUKEE 241007800 We Energies

- Valley Station B24

WI BRO WN 405031990 WI Public Service Corp

- JP Pulliam B27 (unit 8)

WI SHEBOYGAN 460033090 WP & L Allian t Energy

– Edgewater B24

W I BUFFALO 606034110 Dairyland Power Coop Alma Station

(J.P. Madgett boilers) B25 (+B26)

WI BUFFALO 606034110 Dairyland Power Coop Alma Station B27

WI VERNON 663020930 Dairyland Power Coop Genoa Station B20

WI VERNON 663020930 Dairyland Power Coop Genoa Station B25

IN Porter 995 Bailly 7

IN Porter 995 Bailly 8

IN Vermillion 1001 Cayuga 1

IN Vermillion 1001 Cayuga 2

IN Montgomery 1024 Crawfordsville 6

IN Warrick 1012 Culley 2

### 8

IN Warrick 1012 Culley 3

IN Gibson 6113 Gibson 1

IN Gibson 6113 Gi bson 2

IN Cass 1032 Logansport 6

IN Sullivan 6213 Merom 1

IN Sullivan 6213 Merom 2

IN LaPorte 997 Michigan City 12

IN Lake 996 Mitchell 11

IN Pike 994 Petersburg 1

IN Pike 994 Petersburg 2

IN Pike 994 Petersburg 3

IN Pike 1043 Ratts 1

IN Pike 104 3 Ratts 2

IN Wayne 7335 RPL 2

IN Jasper 6085 Schahfer 14

IN Jasper 6085 Schahfer 15

IN Lake 981 Stateline 4

IN Marion 990 Stout 70

IN Dearborn 988 Tanners Creek 4

IN Vigo 1010 Wabash River 6

IN Warrick 6705 Warrick 4

IA 07

- 02

- 005 Cedar Fal ls Utilities Unit #7 (EU10.1A)

IA 88

- 01

- 004 Central Iowa Power Cooperative

(CIPCO)

– Summit Lake Station Comb Turbines (EU

1 /1G , EU2 /2 G)

IA 70

- 08

- 003 Central Iowa Power Cooperative

(CIPCO)

– Fair Station Unit # 2 (EU 2 &

EU 2G)

IA 85

- 01

- 006 City of Am es

- Steam Electric Plant Boiler #7 (EU 2)

IA 29

- 01

- 013 Interstate Power & Light

- Burlington Main Plant Boiler.

IA 03

- 03

- 001 Interstate Power & Light

- Lansing Boiler #4. Sixteen

units in total.

IA 23

- 01

- 014 Interstate Power & Light

- ML Kapp Boiler #2. Six units

in total.

IA 57

- 01

- 042 Interstate Power & Light

- Prairie Creek Boiler #4. Fourteen

units in total.

IA 78

- 01

- 026 MidAmerican Energy Co

- Council Bluffs Boiler #3 (EU003)

IA 97

- 04

- 010 MidAmerican Energy Co

- Neal North Boilers #1

- 3

(EU0 01

- EU003)

IA 97

- 04

- 011 MidAmerican Energy Co

- Neal South Boiler #4 (EU003)

IA 70

- 01

- 011 Muscatine Power and Water Boiler #8

IA 63

- 02

- 005 Pella Municipal Power Plant Boilers #6

- 8

MN 2709900001 Austin Utilities NE Power Station EU001

MN 27 13700027 Hibbing Public Utilities EU003

MN 2703100001 MN Power, Taconite Harbor EU003

MN 2706100004 MN Power, Boswell Energy Center EU003

MN 2701500010 New Ulm Public Utilities EU003

- Boiler 4

MN 2711100002 Otter Tail Power Hoot Lake EU003

MN 27 10900011 Rochester Public Utilities, Silver Lake EU003

MN 2710900011 Rochester Public Utilities, Silver Lake EU004

MN 2713700028 Virginia Public Utilities EU003

- Boiler 9

MN 2714100004 Xcel Energy, Sherco EU001, EU002

MN 2716300005 Xcel Energy, Allen S King EU001

- Boiler 1

### 9

MN 2705300015 Xcel Energy, Riverside EU003

- Boiler 8

MO 290710003 Ameren

- Labadie B1, B2, B3, B4

MO 291830001 Ameren

- Sioux B1, B2

MO 290990016 Ameren

- Rush Island B1, B2

MO 290950031 Auila

- Sibley B3

- 5C

MO 291430004 Assoc. Electric

- New Madrid B1(EP

- 01), B2

(EP

- 02)

MO 290770039 City Utilities Springfield

- Southwest B1 (E09)

MO 290770005 City Utilities Springfield

- James River EO7, EO8

MO 290970001 Empire Distric Electric

- Asbury B7

MO 29083 0001 KC Power and Light

- Montrose EP08

MO 290210004 Aqula

- Lake Road EP06

MO 291750001 Assoc. Electric

- Thomas Hill EP01, EP02

MO 290950021 Trigen

- Kansas City B1A

MO 290190002 City of Columbia Municipal Power Plant EP02

MO 291950010 Marshall Munipal Utilities EP05

MO 290950050 Independence Power & Light

- Blue Valley B3 (EP05)

WV 3943 Fort Martin

WV 6004 Pleasants

WV 3948 Mitchell

WV 3935 Amos

WV 6264 Mountaineer

WV 3944 Harrison

TN 3396 TVA Bull Run

TN 3399 TVA Cumberland

KY 1363 Cane Run

KY 1364 Mill Creek

KY 6041 Spurlock

KY 1384 John Sherman Cooper

KY 1353 Big Sandy

KY 1356 Ghent

KY 1355 Brown

KY 1374 Owensboro Municipal

KY 1372 Henderson Municipal

KY 1378 Paradise

KY 1361 Coleman

KY 1382 Reid/Henderson 2

KY 6639 Green

### 1



## Regional Air Quality Analyses for Ozone, PM2.5, and Regional Haze:

Final Technical Support Document ( Supplement ), September 12, 2008

The purpose of this paper is to summarize a new modeling analysis performed by the Lake

Michigan Air Dir ectors Consorti um (LADCO) to address the effect of the recent court decision

vacat ing EPA’s Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR). This new modeling is intended to supplem ent

the LADCO Technical Support Document (“ Regional Air Quality Analyses for Ozone, PM2.5,

and Regional Haze: Final Technical Support Document”, April 25, 2008) , which summarizes the

air quality analyses conducted by LADCO and its contractors to support the development of

State Implementation Plans for ozone, PM2.5, and regional haze in the States of Illinoi s, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin

.

Compared to the previous LADCO modeling (Round 5.1), the new modeling shows similar

results for ozone, but much more nonattainment for PM2.5 and higher visibility levels for

regional haze. Specifically, the new modeling shows:

Ozone : Attainment of the 0.08 ppm standard by 2009 everywhere in the region, except

Holland, MI , and n onattainment of the 0.075 ppm standard through at least 2018.

PM2.5 : Widespread nonattainment of annual (15 ug/m 3 

### ) and daily (35 ug/m 3 

### ) standards.

Haze : Higher visibility levels on the 20% worst visibility days in 2018 in Class I areas in

the eastern U.S., resulting in most areas being above the glide path.

Background : On July 11, 2008, the U.S. Court of Appeals for D.C. Circuit v acated EPA’s CAIR

rule (cite). The reductions in NOx and SO2 emissions associated with this rule were a key part

of the LADCO States’ attainment demonstrations for ozone and PM2.5 and the reasonable

progress determinations for regional haze . LADCO’s prev ious modeling (Round 5.1) relied on

EGU emission projections from EPA’s IPM3.0 analysis, which assumed implementation of

Phases I and II of CAIR. For this new modeling, alternative EGU emission projections were

developed , which did not rely on CAIR (or IP M).

Model Set

- Up : The new modeling was performed consistent with LADCO’s previous modeling

(Round 5.1):

Model Version: CAMx v4.50beta_deposition

Future Years: 2009, 2012, 2018

Runs: (a) Ozone : Summer 2005 meteorology with 12 km grids

(b) PM2.5 an d haze : F ull year 2005 meteorology with 36 km grids



### Emission Scenarios: The new modeling assumed the same set of “on the books” controls as

in LADCO’s previous modeling (Round 5.1) for all sectors, except EGUs. In light of the CAIR

decision, three new E GU scenarios were prepared:

### 2

Scenario A: 2007 CEM

- based emissions w ere projected for all states in the modeling domain

based on EIA growth rates by state (NERC region) and fuel type. The assumed growth rates for

the Midwest States were: MAIN (IL, IA, MO, WI): 8.8% (2007

- 2018); ECAR (IN, KY, MI, OH):

13.5% (2007

- 2018); and MAPP (MN): 15.1% (2007

- 2018). No control w as applied. The annual

emissions w ere temporalized based on profiles derived from 2004

- 2006 CEM data. (Note, these

are the same temporal prof iles used in R ound 5.1 .)

Scenario B. Scenario A emissions for the LADCO States and select neighboring states (e.g.,

MN, IA, MO, KY, TN, and WV) w ere adjusted by applying legally enforceable controls (i.e.,

emission reductions required by a Consent Decree , state rule, or permit). Only those legally

enforceable controls identified (and justified) by the States w ere applied. The States also

supplied the appropriate control factors. A table summarizing the Scenario B con trols is provided

in Appendix I.

Sc enario C. For the years 2009 and 2012, Scenario A emissions for all states w ere adjusted by

applying all planned SO2 and NOx controls based on the July 10 CAMD list (i.e., 9 0 % reduction

for scrubbers, 9 5 % reduction for SCRs). Because the July 10 CAMD list only includes controls

generally out to 2011, additional SO2 and NOx controls for the year 2018 w ere assumed for all

BART

- eligible EGUs in the five LADCO State plus MN, IA, MO, KY, TN, and MO list (i.e., 9 0 %

reduction for scrubbers, 9 5 % reduction for SCRs )

. 1 

### A ll Scenario B controls we re included in

Scenario C. A table summarizing the Scenario C controls is provided in Appendix II.



### Table 1 and Figure 1 provide a summary of the 5

- state regional NOx and SO2 emissions for

each scenario and future year. (No te, the CAIR emissions included here are based on EPA’s

IPM3.0 modeling.) Several comments on the emissions should be noted:

Summer NOx

• There is ll ittle difference between the three alternative scenarios and CAIR . T his

suggests that summer ozone concen trations for the alternative scenarios are

likely to be similar to those predicted with CAIR (i.e., Round 5.1).

Annual NOx:

• There is a s ignificant change in emissions between scenarios , mostly during the

non

- summer months.

• Scenario B reflects application of NOx controls in several states (e.g., IL,OH, WI).

• Because there are relatively few SCRs (in the LADCO States) on the CAMD list,

Scenario C results in only a small emissions decrease compared to Scenario B

.

• Assumed BART controls result in a significant em issions decrease.

Annual SO2

• There is a s ignificant change in emissions between scenarios

.

• Scenario B reflects application of SO2 controls in several states (e.g., I L,OH, WI).

• Because there are several FGD s (in the LADCO States) on the CAMD list,

Scenario C results in a large emissions decrease compared to Scenario B

.

• Assumed BART controls result in a significant emissions decrease (i.e., even

lower emissions than t he IPM

- estimated CAIR emissions).

1 

### A subsequent analysis was conducted with the following inventory changes: (a) 95% reduction for

scrubbers, 90% redcuction for SCRs (consistent with EPA’s default assumptions for IPM), and (b)

revisions provided for a few plants in Indiana and Minnesota. The changes resulted in a relatively small

difference in the regioinal NOx and SO2 emissions (e.g., about a 2% NOx increase and about a 1

- 2%

decrease in SO2). To assess the impact of the chan ges, PM2.5 modleing was conducted with the new

Scenario B and Scenario C emissions for 2012. The modeling showed little change in the predicted

PM2.5 concentrations.

### 3 

### Figure 1. Regional NOx and SO2 Emissions

Summe r NO x Emi ss ions

0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000

2005 2007 200

9A 200 9B 200 9C

200 9 C AIR 201 2A 201 2B 201 2C

201 2 C AIR 201 8A 201 8B 201 8C

201 8BART

201 8 C AIR



### Annu al NO x Emi ss ions

0 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000

2005 2007 200

9A 200 9B 200 9C

200 9 C AIR 201 2A 201 2B 201 2C

201 2 C AIR 201 8A 201 8B 201 8C

201 8BART

201 8 C AIR



### Annu al SO2 Emi ss ions

0 500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 3,000,000

2005 2007 200

9A 200 9B 200 9C

200 9 C AIR 201 2A 201 2B 201 2C

201 2 C AIR 201 8A 201 8B 201 8C

201 8BART

201 8 C AIR

### 4 

### Table 1. Regional NOx and SO2 Emissions



# Summer NOx Emissions (TPD)

2005 2007 2009 A 2009 B 2009 C 2010

CAIR 2012 A 2012 B 2012 C 2012

CAIR 2018 A 2018 B 2018 C 2018 C

BART 2018

CAIR

IL 305 305 311 311 311 275 340 236 236 266 333 227 227 219 224

I N 393 393 376 376 374 384 393 393 390 368 410 386 383 292 264

MI 393 393 350 350 350 242 366 366 366 229 377 377 377 260 243

OH 408 408 395 355 335 285 423 351 351 290 431 366 366 230 290

WI 413 413 167 160 160 238 184 170 170 177 183 168 168 168 17 7

1,912 1,912 1,599 1,552 1,530 1,424 1,706 1,516 1,513 1,330 1,734 1,524 1,521 1,169 1,198



# Annual NOx Emissions (TPY)

2005 2007 2009 A 2009 B 2009 C 2010

CAIR 2012 A 2012 B 2012 C 2012

CAIR 2018 A 2018 B 2018 C 2018 C

BART 2018

CAIR

IL 126,786 121,006 124,917 124,917 124,917 83,224 137,438 81,989 81,989 82,248 135,983 79,771 79,771 63,590 69,958

IN 214,727 203,493 203,776 203,776 201,947 133,188 212,790 212,790 210,877 125,541 221,950 212,805 210,81 0 177,027 90,415

MI 120,332 112,484 112,478 112,478 112,478 83,117 117,621 117,621 117,621 77,897 122,447 122,447 122,447 89,444 79,543

OH 255,554 240,351 240,016 173,071 164,911 94,346 251,065 172,514 172,514 97,679 261,644 179,737 179,737 125,762 95, 678

WI 71,414 54,582 56,540 54,065 54,065 53,032 62,266 57,759 57,759 56,480 61,812 56,952 56,952 56,952 56,158

788,812 731,917 737,727 668,307 658,317 446,908 781,179 642,673 640,760 439,845 803,837 651,712 649,717 512,774 391,752



# Annual SO2 Emissions (TPY)

2005 2007 2009 A 2009 B 2009 C 2010

CAIR 2012 A 2012 B 2012 C 2012

CAIR 2018 A 2018 B 2018 C 2018 C

BART 2018

CAIR

IL 326,598 273,467 281,028 281,028 281,028 295,516 309,209 196,238 194,746 267,1 10 305,364 106,638 105,152 82,351 275,716

IN 866,964 722,301 721,252 721,252 619,486 374,335 754,323 754,323 558,567 379,144 786,551 764,065 559,945 426,695 359,915

MI 350,694 343,487 343,140 343,140 315,326 227,296 358,879 358,879 301,062 233,204 373, 964 373,964 313,677 178,680 242,853

OH 1,100,510 960,820 959,466 959,466 693,438 427,145 1,003,633 897,099 572,807 370,532 1,045,945 819,770 481,623 333,740 315,560

WI 181,426 137,562 142,007 142,007 133,738 139,181 156,659 144,818 133,592 139,203 155, 818 144,027 132,849 77,214 127,073

2,826,192 2,437,638 2,446,892 2,446,892 2,043,017 1,463,473 2,582,703 2,351,356 1,760,775 1,389,192 2,667,641 2,208,463 1,593,245 1,098,679 1,321,116

### 5



### Modeling Results: Several tables summarizing the modeling result s are provided:

Table 2

- future year ozone and PM2.5 concentrations for key monitors in the

LADCO region

Table 3

- number of monitoring sites greater than the National Ambient Air Quality

Standards (NNAQS)

Table 4

–

visibility levels fo r Class I areas in the eastern U.S.

Note, given that Scenario B and BART controls were only applied in an 11

- state Midwest

region, the validity of the results for other Class I areas in the eastern U.S. may be

questionable. The Scenario C controls, on the other hand, cover all states and are, thus,

likely valid in other Class I areas.

Spatial plots of the future year ozone and PM2.5 concentrations are provided in Figures 2

– 4.

Based on these results, the following key findings should be noted:

Ozone

• There is little change from the previous LADCO modeling (Round 5.1 with CAIR)

• The modeling shows a ttainment of the 0.08 ppm (85 ppb) standard by 2009,

except Holland. (Note, Holland does meet this standard by 2012.)

• The modeling shows nonattainm ent of the 0.075 ppm (75 ppb) standard through

2018.

PM2.5

- Annual

• There is a significant change from the previous LADCO modeling (Round 5.1

with CAIR)

• The modeling shows extensive non atta inment of the annual standard.

PM2.5

- Daily

• There is a signif icant change from the previous LADCO modeling (Round 5.1

with CAIR)

• Th e modeling shows extensive nonattainment of the daily standard.

Haze

• There is a significant change from the previous LADCO modeling (Round 5.1

with CAIR)

• T he modeling shows higher vis ibility levels in 2018 for the 20% worst visibility

days (average about 0.5 deciviews for the northern Class I areas ). The resulting

visibility levels in the northern Class I areas (except Voyageurs) a re above t he

glide path.2005

Round 5

with CAIR Round 5

with CAIR Round 5

with CAIR

Site Site ID Base Year Scen. A Scen. B Scen.C Scen. A Scen. B Scen.C Scen. A Scen. B Scen.C Scen.C-BART

Lake Michigan Area

Chiwaukee 550590019 84.7 82.2 82.2 82.0 82.3 81.1 80.8 80.6 80.9 77.2 77.2 77.0 76.0 76.2

Racine 551010017 80.3 77.8 77.8 77.5 77.5 76.6 76.2 76.1 76.1 72.9 72.3 72.1 71.1 71.2

Milwaukee-Bayside 550890085 82.7 79.9 79.9 79.7 79.8 78.5 78.0 78.0 78.0 74.3 73.6 73.4 72.4 72.7

Harrington Beach 550890009 83.3 80.1 80.1 79.9 80.1 78.6 78.1 78.0 78.3 73.9 73.2 73.1 72.2 72.5

Manitowoc 550710007 85.0 80.8 80.8 80.7 80.8 79.0 78.5 78.4 78.6 73.9 73.2 73.1 72.0 72.5

Sheboygan 551170006 88.0 84.1 84.0 83.9 84.0 82.2 81.7 81.5 81.8 76.9 76.0 75.9 74.8 75.4

Kewaunee 550610002 82.7 78.2 78.2 78.0 78.1 76.4 75.9 75.7 75.9 71.3 70.7 70.5 69.4 69.9

Door County 550290004 88.7 84.1 84.1 83.9 83.9 82.0 81.4 81.3 81.5 76.5 75.6 75.5 74.2 74.7

Hammond 180892008 77.7 76.2 76.2 76.0 75.4 75.6 75.3 75.2 74.6 73.2 72.7 72.6 71.7 71.6

Whiting 180890030 79.3 77.8 77.8 77.7 77.0 77.2 76.9 76.8 76.2 74.8 74.3 74.2 73.2 73.1

Michigan City 180910005 77.0 74.5 74.5 74.3 73.9 73.3 72.9 72.8 72.5 69.7 69.2 69.1 68.1 68.1

Ogden Dunes 181270020 78.3 76.3 76.3 76.2 75.6 75.5 75.1 75.0 74.5 72.9 72.3 72.1 71.2 70.8

Holland 260050003 90.0 85.7 85.7 85.5 85.3 83.5 83.1 82.9 82.8 78.2 77.5 77.3 76.0 76.1

Jenison 261390005 82.0 76.8 76.8 76.7 76.0 75.1 74.6 74.5 74.5 70.2 69.6 69.5 67.9 68.7

Muskegon 261210039 85.0 80.6 80.6 80.5 80.5 78.6 78.2 78.1 78.0 73.5 72.8 72.8 71.5 71.9

Indianapolis Area

Noblesville 189571001 82.7 78.3 78.3 78.1 78.1 76.1 75.9 75.7 75.6 70.2 69.9 69.8 68.9 68.7

Fortville 180590003 78.0 74.1 74.1 73.9 73.9 71.9 71.8 71.7 71.4 66.7 66.5 66.3 65.4 65.1

Fort B. Harrison 180970050 78.7 75.4 75.3 75.2 75.1 73.8 73.6 73.6 73.2 70.6 70.3 70.2 69.3 69.1

Detroit Area

New Haven 260990009 86.0 82.4 82.3 82.1 81.4 81.4 81.2 81.1 80.2 78.1 77.8 77.7 76.5 76.1

Warren 260991003 84.0 82.4 82.3 82.2 81.3 82.1 81.8 81.7 80.7 79.7 79.4 79.3 78.0 77.6

Port Huron 261470005 82.7 78.2 78.2 78.1 77.5 76.5 76.3 76.2 75.5 72.6 72.5 72.3 70.9 70.9

Cleveland Area

Ashtabula 390071001 89.0 84.2 84.1 83.9 83.4 82.0 81.8 81.6 81.0 76.8 76.5 76.4 74.8 75.1

Geauga 390550004 79.3 75.8 75.8 75.6 74.7 74.0 73.8 73.7 72.7 69.5 69.2 69.1 67.6 67.3

Eastlake 390850003 86.3 83.1 83.1 82.9 81.9 81.8 81.6 81.5 80.5 78.2 78.0 77.8 76.5 76.2

Akron 391530020 83.7 79.1 79.1 79.0 78.1 76.9 76.7 76.6 75.6 70.9 70.6 70.4 68.7 68.7

Cincinnati Area

Wilmington 390271002 82.3 77.3 77.4 77.1 77.5 75.3 75.2 74.8 74.9 70.1 69.9 69.5 67.1 68.3

Sycamore 390610006 84.7 81.5 81.4 81.1 81.9 80.4 80.2 79.8 80.3 76.4 76.0 75.7 73.5 74.6

Lebanon 391650007 87.7 82.8 82.8 82.4 83.0 80.8 80.7 80.3 80.7 75.4 75.1 74.8 72.6 74.2

Columbus Area

London 390970007 79.7 75.0 75.0 74.8 75.0 73.0 72.8 72.7 72.6 68.1 67.8 67.6 65.9 66.3

New Albany 390490029 86.3 82.1 82.1 81.9 81.8 80.2 80.0 79.9 79.6 74.7 74.3 74.2 73.3 73.0

Franklin 290490028 80.3 76.7 76.6 76.5 75.9 75.1 74.9 74.8 74.1 70.5 70.2 70.1 70.2 69.0

St. Louis Area

W. Alton (MO) 291831002 86.3 81.1 81.2 81.1 81.0 80.0 79.9 79.9 78.6 76.9 76.8 76.7 74.2 74.9

Orchard (MO) 291831004 87.0 82.1 82.1 82.0 82.0 80.9 80.8 80.7 80.0 77.7 77.6 77.4 75.2 76.2

Sunset Hills (MO) 291890004 82.3 79.2 79.2 79.1 78.7 78.3 78.1 78.1 77.1 75.3 75.2 75.1 73.0 73.9

Arnold (MO) 290990012 82.3 77.8 77.8 77.7 77.2 76.7 76.6 76.5 75.6 73.6 73.4 73.4 71.3 72.0

Margaretta (MO) 295100086 83.0 79.8 79.8 79.7 79.3 78.8 78.7 78.6 77.9 75.7 75.6 75.5 73.7 74.4

Maryland Heights (MO) 291890014 87.3 85.4 85.4 85.3 84.0 84.3 84.1 84.0 81.7 81.1 80.9 80.8 78.4 78.1 Round 5 without CAIR Round 5 without CAIR Round 5 without CAIR 

# Table 2a. Ozone Modeling Results

2009 2012 20182005

Round 5

with CAIR Round 5

with CAIR Round 5

with CAIR

Site Site ID Base Year Scen. A Scen. B Scen.C Scen. A Scen. B Scen.C Scen. A Scen. B Scen.C Scen.C-BART

Illinois

Chicago - Washington HS 170310022 15.2 14.9 14.8 14.5 14.1 14.8 14.7 14.2 14.0 15.0 14.6 14.2 13.7 13.9

Chicago - Mayfair 170310052 15.8 15.1 15.1 14.8 14.4 15.1 14.9 14.5 14.2 15.1 14.7 14.3 13.7 13.9

Chicago - Springfield 170310057 15.0 14.6 14.6 14.3 13.9 14.6 14.4 14.0 13.8 14.8 14.4 14.0 13.4 13.7

Chicago - Lawndale 170310076 14.9 14.5 14.5 14.2 13.8 14.5 14.3 13.9 13.7 14.7 14.3 13.9 13.3 13.6

Blue Island 170312001 14.8 14.4 14.4 14.0 13.7 14.4 14.2 13.8 13.6 14.5 14.1 13.7 13.2 13.4

Summit 170313301 15.2 14.9 14.9 14.6 14.2 14.9 14.7 14.3 14.0 15.0 14.6 14.3 13.7 13.9

Cicero 170316005 15.5 15.1 15.1 14.8 14.4 15.1 14.9 14.5 14.3 15.2 14.9 14.4 13.9 14.2

Granite City 171191007 16.7 16.3 16.2 15.9 15.1 16.1 16.0 15.3 14.9 15.9 15.6 14.9 14.2 14.3

E. St. Louis 171630010 15.6 15.2 15.2 14.8 14.1 15.0 14.9 14.3 13.9 14.9 14.6 14.0 13.3 13.4

Indiana

Jeffersonville 180190005 16.4 15.8 15.7 14.8 13.8 15.8 15.6 14.5 13.7 16.0 15.5 14.3 13.7 13.4

Jasper 180372001 15.2 14.3 14.2 13.4 12.4 14.2 14.0 13.0 12.2 14.3 13.9 12.8 12.1 11.8

Gary 180890031 15.6 13.9 13.9 13.5 13.0 13.8 13.6 13.1 12.8 13.7 13.4 12.9 12.3 12.4

Indy-Washington Park 180970078 15.3 14.4 14.4 13.6 12.8 14.3 14.2 13.2 12.6 14.3 13.9 12.9 12.2 12.0

Indy-W 18th Street 180970081 16.0 15.1 15.1 14.3 15.0 14.9 13.9 15.0 14.6 13.5 12.8

Indy- Michigan Street 180970083 15.9 15.0 15.0 14.2 13.4 14.9 14.8 13.8 13.1 14.9 14.5 13.5 12.8 12.6

Michigan

Allen Park 261630001 14.5 11.0 14.0 13.5 13.0 14.0 13.8 13.2 12.8 13.9 13.6 13.0 12.4 12.4

Southwest HS 261630015 15.9 15.3 15.3 14.8 14.2 15.2 15.0 14.4 13.9 15.1 14.8 14.1 13.5 13.5

Linwood 261630016 14.6 14.1 14.1 13.6 13.1 14.0 13.9 13.3 12.8 13.9 13.6 13.0 12.5 12.5

Dearborn 261630033 17.5 17.0 17.0 16.4 15.8 16.9 16.7 16.0 15.5 16.8 16.4 15.7 15.1 15.1

Wyandotte 261630036 14.7 14.2 14.1 13.6 13.1 14.1 13.9 13.3 12.8 14.0 13.7 13.0 12.4 12.5

Ohio

Middletown - Bonita 390170003 16.2 15.3 15.2 14.3 13.5 15.2 15.0 13.9 13.2 15.2 14.8 13.7 13.0 12.8

Fairfield 390170016 15.8 15.1 15.0 14.1 13.1 15.1 14.9 13.7 12.9 15.2 14.7 13.5 12.8 12.5

Cleveland-28th Street 390350027 15.4 14.9 14.9 14.3 13.5 14.7 14.5 13.9 13.2 14.6 14.2 13.5 12.8 12.7

Cleveland-St. Tikhon 390350038 17.4 16.7 16.7 16.0 15.2 16.5 16.3 15.6 14.8 16.3 16.0 15.2 14.4 14.3

Cleveland-Broadway 390350045 16.5 15.9 15.8 15.2 14.4 15.6 15.5 14.8 14.0 15.5 15.1 14.4 13.6 13.5

Cleveland-GT Craig 390350060 17.1 16.5 16.4 15.8 15.0 16.3 16.1 15.4 14.6 16.1 15.7 15.0 14.2 14.1

Newburg Hts - Harvard Ave 390350065 16.0 15.4 15.3 14.7 14.0 15.2 15.0 14.3 13.6 15.1 14.7 14.0 13.2 13.1

Columbus - Fairgrounds 390490024 15.3 14.6 14.5 13.7 12.9 14.4 14.1 13.2 12.6 14.2 13.8 12.8 12.2 12.0

Columbus - Ann Street 390490025 15.1 14.4 14.3 13.5 12.7 14.2 13.9 13.1 12.4 14.1 13.6 12.6 12.0 11.9

Cincinnati - Seymour 390610014 17.3 16.6 16.5 15.5 14.5 16.5 16.3 15.1 14.3 16.6 16.2 14.9 14.2 13.8

Cincinnati - Taft Ave 390610040 15.5 14.8 14.7 13.8 12.8 14.8 14.6 13.4 12.6 14.9 14.5 13.2 12.5 12.2

Cincinnati - 8th Ave 390610042 16.9 12.0 16.1 15.0 14.0 16.1 15.9 14.7 13.8 16.2 15.7 14.4 13.7 13.4

Sharonville 390610043 15.6 14.9 14.8 13.9 12.9 14.9 14.7 13.5 12.7 14.9 14.5 13.3 12.6 12.3

Norwood 390617001 16.2 15.5 15.4 14.4 13.4 15.4 15.2 14.0 13.2 15.5 15.1 13.8 13.1 12.8

St. Bernard 390618001 17.6 16.8 16.7 15.7 14.7 16.7 16.5 15.3 14.4 16.8 16.4 15.1 14.3 14.0

Steubenville 390810016 15.8 14.5 14.4 13.5 12.8 14.3 14.2 13.1 12.5 14.8 14.5 13.3 12.9 12.7

Mingo Junction 390811001 16.5 15.2 15.2 14.3 13.5 15.0 14.9 13.8 13.2 15.6 15.2 14.0 13.6 13.4

Ironton 390870010 15.2 14.8 14.6 13.6 12.8 14.6 14.4 13.2 12.5 14.8 14.1 12.8 12.4 12.3

Dayton 391130032 15.5 14.9 14.8 14.0 13.2 14.8 14.6 13.6 12.9 14.8 14.3 13.3 12.6 12.4

New Boston 391450013 14.7 12.0 14.0 13.0 12.1 14.1 13.8 12.5 11.9 14.2 13.6 12.2 11.7 11.6

Canton - Dueber 391510017 16.3 15.7 15.6 14.8 14.0 15.5 15.3 14.4 13.6 15.4 14.9 14.0 13.3 13.3

Canton - Market 391510020 14.6 11.0 14.1 13.3 12.6 13.9 13.7 12.9 12.3 13.9 13.5 12.6 12.0 11.9

Akron - Brittain 391530017 15.1 14.6 14.5 13.8 13.0 14.4 14.2 13.4 12.7 14.3 13.8 13.0 12.3 12.3

Akron - W. Exchange 391530023 14.3 13.7 13.7 13.0 12.3 13.6 13.3 12.6 12.0 13.4 13.0 12.2 11.6 11.5 Round 5 without CAIR Round 5 without CAIR Round 5 without CAIR

2009 2018 2012 

# Table 2b. PM 2.5 

# Modeling Results (Annual)2005

Round 5

with CAIR Round 5

with CAIR Round 5

with CAIR

Key Site County Site ID Base Year Scen. A Scen. B Scen.C Scen. A Scen. B Scen.C Scen. A Scen. B Scen.C Scen. C - BART

Illinois

Chicago - Washington HS Cook 170310022 36.6 36 36 36 36 36 36 37 36 37 36 37 37 35

Chicago - Mayfair Cook 170310052 40.3 37 37 37 36 37 36 37 36 38 37 37 37 36

Chicago - Springfield Cook 170310057 37.4 34 34 33 32 35 34 33 32 36 34 33 33 31

Chicago - Lawndale Cook 170310076 38.1 35 35 35 35 36 35 36 35 36 35 36 36 34

McCook Cook 170311016 43.0 39 39 39 39 40 39 40 39 40 40 41 40 38

Blue Island Cook 170312001 37.7 35 35 35 34 36 35 36 34 36 35 36 36 33

Schiller Park Cook 170313103 41.6 40 40 40 39 40 40 40 39 41 40 40 39 39

Summit Cook 170313301 40.2 38 38 39 38 39 38 39 38 39 38 39 39 37

Maywood Cook 170316005 39.2 38 38 38 38 38 38 39 38 39 38 39 39 37

Granite City Madison 171191007 39.2 36 36 35 33 36 35 34 33 36 35 35 33 32

E. St. Louis St. Clair 171630010 33.7 31 31 30 28 31 30 29 28 31 30 30 29 28

Indiana

Jeffersonville Clark 180190005 38.4 35 33 31 29 35 34 32 31 37 35 34 33 31

Jasper Dubois 180372001 36.2 32 32 30 28 32 32 30 29 33 31 31 30 28

Gary - IITRI Lake 180890022 39.0 35 35 35 34 35 34 35 34 36 36 36 35 35

Gary - Burr School Lake 180890026 39.0 34 34 34 33 34 34 35 34 34 34 34 34 32

Gary Lake 180890031 35.2 29 28 26 24 28 28 24 24 29 28 27 27 27

Indy-West Street Marion 180970043 38.0 34 34 33 33 35 35 34 33 36 35 34 34 33

Indy-English Avenue Marion 180970066 38.0 34 34 32 32 35 34 33 32 35 34 33 33 32

Indy-Washington Park Marion 180970078 36.6 33 33 32 31 33 33 32 31 34 33 32 32 32

Indy-W 18th Street Marion 180970081 38.3 33 33 31 31 33 33 32 31 34 33 32 32 31

Indy- Michigan Street Marion 180970083 36.0 32 32 29 28 32 31 29 28 32 31 29 29 29

Michigan

Luna Pier Monroe 261150005 38.9 34 34 32 32 34 34 32 32 34 33 32 31 31

Oak Park Oakland 261250001 39.9 38 38 37 36 38 37 37 36 38 37 37 36 35

Port Huron St. Clair 261470005 39.6 36 35 35 34 35 35 35 34 35 35 34 33 33

Ypsilanti Washtenaw 261610008 39.5 37 37 36 35 37 36 36 35 37 36 36 35 34

Allen Park Wayne 261630001 38.6 36 36 36 35 36 35 35 34 36 35 35 34 33

Southwest HS Wayne 261630015 40.1 36 36 36 35 36 35 35 35 36 35 35 34 33

Linwood Wayne 261630016 43.0 40 40 40 39 40 40 40 39 40 39 39 39 38

E 7 Mile Wayne 261630019 41.0 39 39 39 38 39 39 39 38 39 38 38 38 37

Dearborn Wayne 261630033 43.9 41 41 41 40 41 41 41 40 41 40 40 40 39

Wyandotte Wayne 261630036 37.2 36 36 36 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 34

Newberry Wayne 261630038 42.7 39 39 39 38 39 38 38 37 39 38 38 37 36

FIA Wayne 261630039 39.7 35 34 34 33 35 34 34 33 35 34 33 33 31

Ohio

Middleton Butler 390170003 39.3 33 32 29 28 33 33 29 28 34 32 29 28 27

Fairfield Butler 390170016 37.1 32 31 29 27 31 30 28 28 32 30 29 28 27

Butler 390170017 40.8 33 32 30 29 33 33 30 29 33 32 30 29 28

Cleveland-28th Street Cuyahoga 390350027 36.9 34 34 33 32 34 33 33 32 34 33 33 31 31

Cleveland-St. Tikhon Cuyahoga 390350038 44.2 40 40 37 36 40 39 36 35 40 38 36 35 34

Cleveland-Broadway Cuyahoga 390350045 38.8 35 35 33 31 35 34 32 30 35 34 31 29 29

Cleveland-GT Craig Cuyahoga 390350060 42.1 39 39 38 37 39 38 38 37 39 38 37 36 35

Newburg Hts - Harvard Ave Cuyahoga 390350065 38.9 35 35 33 31 35 34 32 30 36 35 32 31 30

Columbus - Fairgrounds Franklin 390490024 38.5 34 34 33 33 34 33 32 32 34 34 33 32 31

Columbus - Ann Street Franklin 390490025 38.5 34 33 31 31 33 33 31 31 34 33 31 31 30

Cincinnait Hamilton 390610006 40.6 33 33 30 27 33 32 29 28 34 32 29 28 27 Round 5 without CAIR Round 5 without CAIR Round 5 without CAIR

2009 2012 2018 

# Table 2c. PM 2.5 

# Modeling Results (Daily)2005

Round 5

with CAIR Round 5

with CAIR Round 5

with CAIR

Key Site County Site ID Base Year Scen. A Scen. B Scen.C Scen. A Scen. B Scen.C Scen. A Scen. B Scen.C Scen. C - BART Round 5 without CAIR Round 5 without CAIR Round 5 without CAIR

2009 2012 2018 

# Table 2c. PM 2.5 

# Modeling Results (Daily)

Cincinnati - Seymour Hamilton 390610014 38.4 33 33 28 26 33 32 27 25 33 31 29 25 24

Cincinnati - Taft Ave Hamilton 390610040 36.7 31 30 26 24 31 30 26 24 32 29 26 24 23

Cincinnati - 8th Ave Hamilton 390610042 37.3 32 32 30 28 32 31 29 28 33 31 29 28 27

Sharonville Hamilton 390610043 36.0 32 31 30 28 32 31 29 28 32 31 29 28 27

Norwood Hamilton 390617001 38.8 34 33 32 30 33 33 31 30 34 33 31 30 29

St. Bernard Hamilton 390618001 40.6 35 35 32 30 35 34 31 30 35 33 32 31 29

Steubenville Jefferson 390810016 40.7 36 35 32 29 35 34 30 28 37 35 31 29 28

Mingo Junction Jefferson 390811001 42.0 37 37 33 30 37 36 32 30 38 36 32 30 30

Dayton Montgomery 391130032 37.8 34 33 31 30 33 33 31 30 34 33 31 31 30

Canton - Dueber Stark 391510017 38.6 33 32 30 28 33 31 30 28 33 30 29 28 27

Akron - Brittain Summit 391530017 38.1 33 33 31 30 33 32 31 30 33 32 30 29 29

Wisconsin

Green Bay - Est High Brown 550090005 37.1 35 34 35 35 34 35 35 34 33 33 33 32 32

Madison Dane 550250047 36.4 33 33 32 32 33 32 32 31 32 31 30 29 29

Milwaukee-Health Center Milwaukee 550790010 38.7 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 34 35 34 34 34 33

Milwaukee-SER Hdqs Milwaukee 550790026 37.4 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 33

Milwaukee-Virginia FS Milwaukee 550790043 39.9 37 37 37 36 37 36 37 36 36 36 37 36 36

Milwaukee- Fire Dept Hdqs Milwaukee 550790099 37.8 34 34 33 33 34 33 33 32 34 33 33 33 32

Waukesha Waukesha 551330027 35.5 32 32 32 31 32 32 32 31 32 31 31 30 29

### 10 

### Table 3. Mo deling Res ults: Number of Sites > NAAQS

Ozone (85 ppb) Round 5 without CAIR Round 5 w/ CAIR

2009 Baseyear Scen. A Scen. B Scen. C Scen. C

- BART

IL 0 0 0 0

---- 0

IN 0 0 0 0

---- 0

MI 3 1 1 1

---- 1

OH 4 0 0 0

---- 0

WI 2 0 0 0

---- 0

Total 9 1 1 1 1

2012

IL 0 0 0 0

---- 0

IN 0 0 0 0

---- 0

MI 3 0 0 0

---- 0

OH 4 0 0 0

---- 0

WI 2 0 0 0

---- 0

Total 9 0 0 0 0

2018

IL 0 0 0 0 0 0

IN 0 0 0 0 0 0

MI 3 0 0 0 0 0

OH 4 0 0 0 0 0

WI 2 0 0 0 0 0

Total 9 0 0 0 0 0

O zone (75 ppb) Round 5 without CAIR Round5 w/ CAIR

2009 Baseyear Scen. A Scen. B Scen. C Scen. C

- BART

IL 12 6 6 6

---- 4

IN 26 10 9 8

---- 5

MI 21 12 12 12

---- 12

OH 45 27 25 24

---- 21

WI 12 10 10 10

---- 10

Total 116 65 62 60

---- 52

20 12

IL 12 3 3 3

---- 1

IN 26 5 4 4

---- 3

MI 21 9 8 8

---- 6

OH 45 18 14 12

---- 11

WI 12 10 9 9

---- 9

Total 116 45 38 36 30

2018

IL 12 0 0 0 0 0

IN 26 0 0 0 0 0

MI 21 3 3 3 3 3

OH 45 3 3 2 1 1

WI 12 3 2 1 1 1

Total 116 9 8 6 5 5

### 11

PM2.5

- Annual Round 5 without CAIR Round 5 w/ CAIR

2009 Baseyear Scen. A Scen. B Scen. C Scen. C

- BART

IL 7 4 4 1

---- 1

IN 6 2 2 0

---- 0

MI 2 2 2 1

---- 1

OH 26 1 3 12 5

---- 1

WI 0 0 0 0

---- 0

Total 41 21 20 7 3

2012

IL 7 3 1 1

---- 0

IN 6 1 1 0

---- 0

MI 2 2 1 1

---- 1

OH 26 12 9 4

---- 0

WI 0 0 0 0

---- 0

Total 41 18 12 6 1

2018

IL 7 3 1 0 0 0

IN 6 1 1 0 0 0

MI 2 2 1 1 1 1

OH 26 13 8 2 0 0

WI 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 41 19 11 3 1 1

PM2.5

- Daily

Round 5 without CAIR Round 5 w/ CAIR

2009 Baseyear Scen. A Scen. B Scen. C Scen. C

- BART

IL 16 7 7 6

---- 6

IN 13 0 0 0

---- 0

MI 14 10 9 9

---- 5

OH 31 4 3 2

---- 2

WI 8 1 1 1

---- 1

Total 82 2 2 20 18

---- 14

2012

IL 16 9 6 8

---- 6

IN 13 0 0 0

---- 0

MI 14 8 6 6

---- 5

OH 31 3 3 2

---- 1

WI 8 1 1 1

---- 1

Total 82 21 16 1 7 13

2018

IL 16 10 6 8 8 5

IN 13 4 1 1 0 0

MI 14 8 6 6 5 4

OH 31 5 3 2 1 0

WI 8 1 1 1 1 1

Total 82 2 8 17 18 1 5 10

### 12 

### Ta ble 4 . Mo deling Results: Future Year Visibility Levels

Worst 20% 2018

Round 5 without CAIR Round 5 w/ CAIR

Site Baseline

(2000

- 2004) 2018 URP Scen. A Scen. B Scen. C Scen. C

BART

BOWA1 19.86 17.94 19.09 18.87 18.54 18.02 17.94

VOYA2 19.48 17.75 18.60 18.44 18.17 17.77 17.63

SENE1 24.38 21.64 24.02 23.58 23.03 22.38 22.59

ISLE1 21.59 19.43 21.05 20.86 20.62 20.22 20.09

ISLE9 21.59 19.43 20.83 20.58 20.38 19.84 19.84

HEGL1 26.75 23.13 26.24 25.83 24.87 24.23 24.22

MI NG1 28.15 24.27 27.51 26.98 25.81 24.93 24.74

CACR1 26.36 22.91 25.32 24.80 23.57 22.97 22.44

UPBU1 26.27 22.82 25.31 24.79 23.50 22.79 22.59

MACA1 31.37 26.64 30.11 29.08 27.06 26.24 26.10

DOSO1 29.05 24.69 27.88 26.96 24.36 23.74 23.00

SHEN1 29 .31 25.12 28.38 27.65 25.24 24.69 23.92

JARI1 29.12 24.91 28.06 27.21 25.00 24.48 24.06

BRIG1 29.01 25.05 28.10 28.07 26.57 26.25 25.21

LYBR1 24.45 21.48 24.06 23.86 22.58 22.30 21.14

ACAD1 22.89 20.45 22.88 22.76 22.31 22.16 21.49

Best 20% 2018

Round 5 without CAIR Round 5 w/ CAIR

Site Baseline

(2000

- 2004) 2018 Max Scen. A Scen. B Scen. C Scen. C

BART

BOWA1 6.42 6.42 6.20 6.17 6.16 6.12 6.14

VOYA2 7.09 7.09 6.87 6.83 6.81 6.78 6.75

SENE1 7.14 7.14 7.80 7.78 7. 81 7.77 7.71

ISLE1 6.75 6.75 6.77 6.76 6.72 6.67 6.60

ISLE9 6.75 6.75 6.63 6.61 6.58 6.53 6.52

HEGL1 12.84 12.84 12.17 12.20 12.07 11.63 11.66

MING1 14.46 14.46 13.78 13.77 13.70 13.37 13.28

CACR1 11.24 11.24 10.94 10.99 10.97 10.78 10. 52

UPBU1 11.71 11.71 11.18 11.23 11.18 10.96 10.73

MACA1 16.51 16.51 16.32 16.21 15.76 15.34 15.25

DOSO1 12.28 12.28 12.02 11.84 11.27 11.03 11.00

SHEN1 10.93 10.93 10.98 10.91 10.25 10.16 9.91

JARI1 14.21 14.21 14.19 13.98 13.42 13.21 13.14

BRI G1 14.33 14.33 14.32 14.46 14.22 14.17 13.92

LYBR1 6.37 6.37 6.39 6.38 6.31 6.28 6.14

ACAD1 8.78 8.78 8.97 8.96 8.90 8.89 8.82

### 13 

### Figure 2. Ozone Modeling Results

2009 Round 5

–

S cen

. A Round 5

– Scen. B Round 5

– Scen. C Round 5

- CAIR

2012 Round 5

–

Scen. A Round 5

– Scen. B Round 5

– Scen. C Round 5

- CAIR

2018 Round 5

–

Scen. A Round 5

– Scen. B Round 5

– Scen. C Round 5

- CAIR

### 14 

### Figure 3. PM2.5 Annual Modeling Results

2009 Round 5

– Scen. A Round 5

– S cen. B Round 5

– Scen. C Round 5

- CAIR

2012 Round 5

– Scen. A Round 5

– Scen. B Round 5

– Scen. C Round 5

- CAIR

2018 Round 5

– Scen. A Round 5

– Scen. B Round 5

– Scen. C Round 5

- CAIR

### 15 

### Figure 4 . PM2.5 Daily Modeling Results

2009 Round 5

– Scen. A Round 5

– Scen. B Round 5

– Scen. C Round 5

- CAIR

2012 Round 5

– Scen. A Round 5

– Scen. B Round 5

– Scen. C Round 5

- CAIR

2018 Round 5

– Scen. A Round 5

– Scen. B Round 5

– Scen. C Round 5

- CAIR

# Appendix I

Scenario B (Legally Enforceable) ControlsNOx

– 2009

Point Source Grown and Controlled Emissions by facility for NOX r6s1b_2009 Base Year = 2002

Future Year = 2009

STID=17 CYID=57 fcid=057801AAA name=AES DUCK CREEK

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 57 057801AAA 0001 0001 01 10100202 NOX 0.8147 0.8416 0.8416 0.00 0.00 SCR SCR added by LADCO

STID=17 CYID=143 fcid=143805AAG name=AES ED EDWARDS STATION

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 143 143805AAG 0001 0001 01 10100202 NOX 3.0515 3.1522 3.1522 0.00 0.00 lnb LNB added by LADCO

17 143 143805AAG 0001 0003 01 10100202 NOX 6.9419 7.1708 7.1708 0.00 0.00 lnb LNB added by LADCO

17 143 143805AAG 0002 0004 01 10100202 NOX 2.1310 2.2013 2.2013 0.00 0.00 lnb LNB added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 12.1244 12.5243 12.5243

cyid 12.1244 12.5243 12.5243

stid 12.9392 13.3659 13.3659

STID=39 CYID=1 fcid=0701000007 name="DP&L, J.M. STUART GENERATING STATION"

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrlde s

39 1 0701000007 R1 B001 B001P1 10100202 NOX 6.9860 6.9756 2.3252 0.85 0.95 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 1 0701000007 R2 B002 B002P1 10100202 NO X 3.6327 3.6273 1.2091 0.85 0.95 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 1 0701000007 R3 B003 B003P1 10100202 NOX 5.0133 5.0058 1.6686 0.85 0.95 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 1 0701000007 R4 B004 B004P1 10100202 NOX 7.8493 7.8376 2.6125 0.85 0.95 SCR SCR added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 23.4814 23.4464 7.8155

cyi d 23.4814 23.4464 7.8155

STID=39 CYID=167 fcid=0684000000 name=MUSKINGUM RIVER POWER PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control E F Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

39 167 0684000000 R1 B001 B001P1 10200501 NOX 0.0017 0.0017 0.0001 0.00 0.95 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R2 B002 B002P1 10100201 NOX 5.8167 5.8080 0.2904 0.00 0.95 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R2 B002 B002P2 10100501 NOX 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 0.95 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R3 B003 B003P1 10100201 NOX 7.9017 7.8899 0.3945 0.00 0.95 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R3 B003 B003P2 10100501 NOX 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 0.95 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R4 B004 B004P1 10100203 NOX 7.8775 7.8657 0.3933 0.00 0.95 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R4 B004 B004P2 10100501 NOX 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 0.95 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R6 B006 B006P1 10100202 NOX 3.8586 3.8528 0.1926 0.00 0.95 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R6 B006 B006P2 10100501 NOX 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00 0.95 SCR SCR added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- f cid 25.4561 25.4182 1.2709

cyid 25.4561 25.4182 1.2709

stid 48.9375 48.8646 9.0864

STID=55 CYID=79 fcid=241007800 name=WIS ELECTRIC POWER VALLEY STATION

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future YearSTID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

55 79 241007800 S11 B21 01 10100202 NOX 2.7972 2.8 895 1.6470 0.00 0.43 SCR SCR added by LADCO

55 79 241007800 S11 B22 01 10100202 NOX 2.9073 3.0032 1.7118 0.00 0.43 SCR SCR added by LADCO

55 79 241007800 S12 B23 01 10100202 NOX 2.3270 2.4038 1.2740 0.00 0.47 SCR SCR added by LADCO

55 79 241007800 S12 B24 01 1010020 2 NOX 2.3427 2.4199 1.2826 0.00 0.47 SCR Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 10.3742 10.7164 5.9154

cyid 10.3742 10.7164 5.9154

STID=55 CYID=117 fcid=460033090 name=WP & L Alliant Energy

- Edgewater Gen Station

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

55 117 460033090 S1 1 B23 01 10100203 NOX 1.6197 1.6731 1.0038 0.00 0.40 SCR SCR added by LADCO

55 117 460033090 S11 B24 01 10100203 NOX 4.1072 4.2426 3. 4789 0.00 0.18 SCR SCR added by LADCO

55 117 460033090 S12 B25 01 10100221 NOX 5.6804 5.8677 4.9876 0.00 0.15 SCR SCR added by LADCO

- --- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 11.4072 11.7834 9.4703

cyid 11.4072 11.7834 9.4703

stid 21.7814 22.4997 15.3857

======== ======== ==========

83.6581 84.7302 37.8380NOx

- 2012

Point Source Grown and Controlled Emissions by facility for N OX r6s1b_2012 Base Year = 2002

Future Year = 2012

STID=17 CYID=33 fcid=0338 01AAA name=AMEREN ENERGY GENERATING CO

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc poli d Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 33 033801AAA 0005 0005 01 10100202 NOX 1.642 1.871 0.9357 0.00 0.500 SCR SCR added by LADCO

17 33 033801AAA 0006 0006 01 10100202 NOX 2.116 2.413 1.2063 0.00 0.500 SCR SCR added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 3.758 4.284 2.1420

cyid 3.758 4.284 2.1420

STID=17 CYID=57 fcid=057801AAA name=AES DUCK CREEK

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 57 057801AAA 0001 0001 01 10100202 NOX 0.815 0.929 0.9288 0.00 0.000 SCR SCR added by LADCO

STID=17 CYID=79 fcid=079808AAA name=AMER EN ENERGY GENERATING CO

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 79 079808AAA 0003 0003 01 10100202 NOX 6.735 7.678 7.6780 0.00 0.000 SCR SCR added by LADCO

17 79 079808AAA 0012 0013 01 10100501 NOX 5.936 5.378 5.3781 0.00 0.000 SCR SCR added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 12.671 13.056 13.0561

cyid 12.671 13.056 13.0561

STID=17 CYID=97 fcid=097190AAC name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctr ltype ctrldes

17 97 097190AAC 0016 0031 02 10100401 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SCR added by LADCO

STID=17 CYID=137 fcid=137805AAA name=AMEREN ENE RGY GENERATING CO

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons /Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 137 137805AAA 0003 0003 01 10100202 NOX 5.356 6.106 6.1058 0.00 0.000 LNB LNB added by LADCO

STID=17 CYID=143 fcid=143805AAG name=AES ED EDWARDS STATION

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 143 143805AAG 0001 0001 01 10100202 NOX 3.052 3.479 3.4789 0.00 0.000 lnb LNB added by LADCO

17 143 143805AAG 0001 0003 01 10100202 NOX 6.942 7.914 7.9141 0.00 0.000 lnb LNB added by LADCO

17 143 14

3805AAG 0002 0004 01 10100202 NOX 2.131 2.429 2.4294 0.00 0.000 lnb LNB added by LADCO

---- -------- - ------- ---------- fcid 12.124 13.822 13.8224

cyid 12.124 13.822 13.8224STID=17 CYID=167 fcid=167120AAO name=CITY WATER LIGHT & POWER

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 167 167120AAO 0010 0012 01 10100203 NOX 6.527 7.441 0.0074 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SHUTDOWN added by LADCO

17 167 167120AAO 0010 0013 01 10100203 NOX 2.646 3.017 0.0030 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SHUTDOWN added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 9.173 10.458 0.0105

cyid 9.173 10.458 0.0 105

STID=17 CYID=179 fcid=179801AAA name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 179 179801AAA 0018 0029 01 10 100203 NOX 22.429 25.570 1.2785 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

17 179 179801AAA 0018 0031 01 10100203 NOX 38.993 44.454 2.2227 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 61.422 7 0.024 3.5012

cyid 61.422 70.024 3.5012

STID=17 CYID=197 fcid=197809AAO name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 197 197809AAO 0032 0033 02 10100604 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.800 SCR SCR added by LADCO

STID=17 CYID=197 fcid=197810AAK name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year F uture Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 197 197810AAK 0011 0016 02 10100222 NOX 5.731 6.534 3.9203 0.00 0.400 SCR SCR added by LADCO

17 197 197810AAK 0011 0016 03 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.400 SCR SCR added by LADCO

17 197 197810AAK 0013 0010 02 10100223 NOX 8.598 9.802 0.0098 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SCR added by LADCO

17 197 197810AAK 0013 0010 03 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SCR added by LADCO

17 197 197810AAK 0007 0012 02 10100223 NOX 10.974 12.511 0.01 25 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SCR added by LADCO

17 197 197810AAK 0007 0012 03 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SCR added by LADCO

-- -- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 25.303 28.847 3.9426

cyid 25.303 28.847 3.9426

stid 130.622 147.527 43.5096

STID=27 CYID=61 fcid=2706100004 name=Minnesota Power Inc

- Boswell Energy Ctr

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

27 61 2706100004 SV003 EU003 001 10100226 NOX 13.661 14.142 2.8284 0.00 0.800 SCR SCR added by LADCO

27 61 2706100004 SV003 EU00 3 002 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.800 SCR SCR added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fci d 13.661 14.142 2.8284

cyid 13.661 14.142 2.8284

STID=27 CYID=109 fcid=2710900011 name=Rochester Public Utilities

- Silver Lake

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes27 1 09 2710900011 SV003 EU004 001 10100202 NOX 2.079 2.152 1.2911 0.00 0.400 SNCR SCR added by LADCO

---- ---- ---- -------- ---------- stid 15.739 16.294 4.1195

STID=39 CYID=1 fcid=0701000007 name="DP&L, J.M. STUART GENERATING STATION"

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid T ons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

39 1 0701000007 R1 B001 B001P1 10100202 NOX 6.986 7.296 2.4319 0.85 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 1 0701000007 R2 B002 B002P1 10100202 NOX 3.633 3.794 1.2646 0.85 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 1 0701000007 R3 B003 B003P 1 10100202 NOX 5.013 5.235 1.7452 0.85 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 1 0701000007 R4 B004 B004P1 10100202 NOX 7.849 8.197 2.7324 0.85 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 23.481 24.522 8.1740

cyid 23.481 24.522 8.1740

STID=39 CYID=31 fcid=0616000000 name=CONESVILLE POWER PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid s tkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

39 31 0616000000 R4 B004 B004P1 10100212 NOX 20.852 21.776 1.0888 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

STID=39 CYID=167 fcid=0684000000 name=MUSKINGUM RIVER POWER PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

39 167 0684000000 R1 B001 B001P1 10200501 NOX 0.002 0.002 0.0001 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R2 B002 B002P1 10100201 NOX 5.817 6.074 0.3037 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R2 B002 B002P2 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 167 068400

0000 R3 B003 B003P1 10100201 NOX 7.902 8.252 0.4126 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R3 B003 B003P2 10100501 NOX 0.000 0. 000 0.0000 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R4 B004 B004P1 10100203 NOX 7.877 8.227 0.4113 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R4 B004 B004P2 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R6 B006 B006P1 1010 0202 NOX 3.859 4.030 0.2015 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R6 B006 B006P2 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0. 950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 25.456 26. 584 1.3292

cyid 25.456 26.584 1.3292

stid 69.789 72.882 10.5920

STID=55 CYID=79 fcid=241007690 name=WIS ELECTRIC POWER OAK CR EEK STATION

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

55 79 241007690 S13 B25 01 10100202 NOX 4.755 5.421 3.0898 0.00 0.430 SCR SCR added by LADCO

55 79 241007690 S13 B26 01 10100202 NOX 3.277 3.736 2.2045 0.00 0.410 SCR SCR added by LADCO

55 79 241007690 S14 B27 01 10100212 NOX 3.333 3.800 2.8499 0.00 0.250 SCR SCR added by LADCO

55 79 241007690 S14 B28 01 10100212 NOX 3.384 3.857 2.9316 0.00 0.240 SC R SCR added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 14.749 16.814 11. 0757

STID=55 CYID=79 fcid=241007800 name=WIS ELECTRIC POWER VALLEY STATIONBase Yr Grown Controll ed Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

55 79 241007800 S11 B21 0 1 10100202 NOX 2.797 3.189 1.8177 0.00 0.430 SCR SCR added by LADCO

55 79 241007800 S11 B22 01 10100202 NOX 2.907 3.314 1.8893 0.0 0 0.430 SCR SCR added by LADCO

55 79 241007800 S12 B23 01 10100202 NOX 2.327 2.653 1.4061 0.00 0.470 SCR SCR added by LADCO

55 79 241007800 S12 B24 01 10100202 NOX 2.343 2.671 1.4155 0.00 0.470 SCR Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 10.374 11.827 6.5285

cyid 25.123 28.641 17.6042

STID=55 CYID=117 fcid=460033090 name=WP & L Alliant Energy

- Edgewater Gen Station

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrl type ctrldes

55 117 460033090 S11 B23 01 10100203 NOX 1.620 1.846 1.1079 0.00 0.400 SCR SCR added by LADCO

55 117 460033090 S11 B24 0 1 10100203 NOX 4.107 4.682 3.8395 0.00 0.180 SCR SCR added by LADCO

55 117 460033090 S12 B25 01 10100221 NOX 5.680 6.476 5.5045 0.0 0 0.150 SCR SCR added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 11 .407 13.005 10.4519

cyid 11.407 13.005 10.4519

stid 36.530 41.646 28.0562

======== ======== ==========

252.681 278.349 86.2773NOx 20 18

Point Source Grown and Controlled Emissions by facility for NOX r6s1b_2018 Base Year = 2002

Future Year = 2018

STID=17 CYID=31 fcid=031600AIN name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 31 031600AIN 0010 0013 01 10100226 NOX 2.283 2. 592 1.5550 0.00 0.400 SCR SCR added by LADCO

17 31 031600AIN 0010 0013 02 10100601 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.400 SCR SCR added by LADCO

17 31 031600AIN 0012 0016 01 10100226 NOX 3.991 4.531 2.7184 0.00 0.400 SCR SCR added by LADCO

17 31 031600AIN 0012 0016 02 1010 0601 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.400 SCR SCR added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 6.274 7.122 4.2734

cyid 6.274 7. 122 4.2734

STID=17 CYID=33 fcid=033801AAA name=AMEREN ENERGY GENERATING CO

Base Yr Grown Co ntrolled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 33 033801AAA 0005 0005 01 10100202 NOX 1.642 1.863 0.9317 0.00 0.500 SCR SCR added by LADCO

17 33 033801AAA 0006 0006 01 10100202 NOX 2.116 2.402 1.2012 0.00 0.500 SCR SCR added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 3.758 4.266 2.1329

cyid 3.758 4.266 2.1329

STID=17 CYID=57 fcid=057801AAA name=AES DUCK CREEK

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 57 057801AAA 0001 0001 01 10100202 NOX 0.815 0.925 0.924 9 0.00 0.000 SCR SCR added by LADCO

STID=17 CYID=79 fcid=079808AAA name=AMEREN ENERGY GENERATING CO

Base Yr Grown Controlled Ba se Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 79 079808AAA 0003 0003 01 10100202 NOX 6.735 7.645 7.6453 0.00 0.000 SCR SCR added by LADCO

17 79 079808AAA 0012 0013 01 10100501 NOX 5.936 3.984 3.9838 0.00 0.000 SCR SCR added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 12.671 11.629 11.6291

cyid 12.671 11.629 11.6291

STID=17 CYID=97 fcid=097190AAC name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 97 097190AAC 0016 0031 02 10100401 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SCR added by LADCO

STID=17 CYID=137 fcid=137805AAA name=AMEREN ENERGY GENERATING CO

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Ye ar Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 137 137805AAA 0003 0003 01 10100 202 NOX 5.356 6.080 6.0798 0.00 0.000 LNB LNB added by LADCOSTID=17 CYID=143 fcid=143805AAG name=AES ED EDWARDS STATION

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 143 143805AAG 0001 0001 01 10100202 NOX 3.052 3.464 3.4641 0.00 0.000 lnb LNB added by LADCO

17 143 143805AAG 0001 0003 01 10100202 NOX 6.942 7.880 7.8804 0.00 0.000 lnb LNB added by LADCO

17 143 143805AAG 0002 0004 01 10100202 NOX 2.131 2.419 2.4191 0.00 0.000 lnb LNB added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 12.124 13.764 13.7636

cyid 12.124 13.764 13.7636

STID=17 CYID= 167 fcid=167120AAO name=CITY WATER LIGHT & POWER

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 167 167120AAO 0010 0012 01 10100203 NOX 6.527 7.410 0.0074 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SHUTDOWN added by LADCO

17 167 167120AAO 0010 0013 01 10100203 NOX 2.646 3.004 0.0030 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SHUTDOWN added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 9.173 10.414 0.0104

cyid 9.173 10.414 0.0104

STID=17 CYID=179 fcid=179801AAA name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Contro l EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 179 179801AAA 0018 0029 01 10100203 NOX 22.429 25.462 1.2731 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

17 179 179801 AAA 0018 0031 01 10100203 NOX 38.993 44.265 2.2132 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

---- -------- ----- --- ---------- fcid 61.422 69.726 3.4863

cyid 61.422 69.726 3.4863

STID=17 CYID=197 fcid=197809AAO name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 197 197809AAO 0032 0033 02 10100604 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.800 SCR SCR added by LADCO

STID=17 CYID=197 fcid=197810AAK name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 197 197810AAK 0011 0016 02 10100222 NOX 5.731 6.506 3.9036 0.00 0.400 SCR SCR added by LADCO

17 197 197810AAK 0 011 0016 03 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.400 SCR SCR added by LADCO

17 197 197810AAK 0013 0010 02 10100223 NOX 8.598 9.760 0.0098 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SCR added by LADCO

17 197 197810AAK 0013 0010 03 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SCR added by LADCO

17 197 197810AAK 0007 0012 02 10100223 NOX 10.974 12.458 0.0125 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SCR added by LADCO

17 197 197810AAK 0007 0012 03 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.999 SHUTDOWN SCR added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 25.303 28.724 3.9258

cyid 25.303 28.724 3.9258

stid 136.896 152.649 46.2263STID=18 CYID=147 fcid=00020 name=INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER

- ROCKPORT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

18 147 00020 1 001 01 10100222 NOX 23.226 25.291 1.2646 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

18 147 00020 1 001 02 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 23.226 25.291 1.2646

cyid 23.226 25.291 1.2646

stid 23.226 25.291 1.2646

STID=27 CYID=61 fcid=2706100004 name=Minnesota Power Inc

- Boswell Energy Ctr

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

27 61 2706100004 SV003 EU003 001 10100226 NOX 13.661 15.733 3.1466 0.00 0.800 SCR SCR added by LADCO

27 61 2706100004 SV003 EU003 002 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.800 SCR SCR added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 13.661 15.733 3.1466

cyid 13.661 15.733 3.1466

STID=27 CYID=109 fcid=2710900011 name=Rochester Public Utilities

- Silver Lake

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

27 109 271090

0011 SV003 EU004 001 10100202 NOX 2.079 2.394 1.4363 0.00 0.400 SNCR SCR added by LADCO

---- -------- ----- --- ---------- stid 15.739 18.127 4.5830

STID=39 CYID=1 fcid=0701000007 name="DP&L, J.M. STUART GENERATING STATION"

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day To ns/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

39 1 0701000007 R1 B001 B001P1 10100202 NOX 6.986 7.607 2.5358 0.85 0.950 SCR SCR added by LAD CO

39 1 0701000007 R2 B002 B002P1 10100202 NOX 3.633 3.956 1.3186 0.85 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 1 0701000007 R3 B003 B003P1 10100202 NOX 5.013 5.459 1.8197 0.85 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 1 0701000007 R4 B004 B004P1 10100202 NOX 7.849 8.547 2.8491 0.85 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 23.481 25.570 8.5232

cyid 23.481 25.570 8.5232

STID=39 CYID=31 fcid=0616000000 name=CONESVILLE POWER PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

39 31 0616000000 R4 B004 B004P1 10100212 NOX 20.852 22.706 1.1353 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

STID=39 CYID=167 fcid=0684000000 name=MUSKINGUM RIVER POWER PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year F uture Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

39 167 0684000000 R1 B001 B001P1 10200501 NOX 0.002 0.002 0.0001 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO39 167 0684000000 R2 B002 B002P1 10100201 NOX 5.817 6.334 0.3167 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R2 B002 B002P2 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R3 B003 B003P1 10100201 NOX 7.902 8.604 0.4302 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R3 B003 B003P2 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.00 00 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R4 B004 B004P1 10100203 NOX 7.877 8.578 0.4289 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R4 B004 B004P2 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R6 B006 B006P1 10100202 NOX 3.859 4.202 0.2101 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R6 B006 B006P2 10100501 NOX 0.000 0.000 0.0000 0.00 0.950 SCR SCR added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 25.456 27.720 1.38 60

cyid 25.456 27.720 1.3860

st id 69.789 75.996 11.0445

STID=54 CYID=39 fcid=0006 name=APPALACHIAN POWER

- KANAWHA RIVER PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

54 39 0006 012 001 99 10100202 NOX 4.829 5.258 2.6291 0.00 0.500 SCR Scrubber added by LADCO

54 39 0006 012 002 99 10100202 NOX 4.921 5.359 2.6794 0.00 0.500 SCR Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 9.750 10.617 5.3085

cyid 9.750 10.617 5.3085

stid 9.750 10.617 5.3085

STID=55 CYID=79 fcid=241007690 name=WIS ELECTRIC POWER OAK CREEK STATION

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

55 79 241007690 S13 B25 01 10 100202 NOX 4.755 5.398 3.0766 0.00 0.430 SCR SCR added by LADCO

55 79 241007690 S13 B26 01 10100202 NOX 3.277 3.720 2.1951 0.00 0.410 SCR SCR added by LADCO

55 79 241007690 S14 B27 01 10100212 NOX 3.333 3.784 2.8378 0.00 0.250 SCR SCR added by LADCO

55 79 241007690 S14 B28 01 10100212 NOX 3.384 3.841 2.9191 0.00 0.240 SCR SCR added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 14.749 16.743 11.0285

STID=55 CYID=79 fcid=241007800 name=WIS ELECTRIC POWER VALL EY STATION

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

55 79 241007800 S11 B21 01 10100202 NOX 2.797 3.175 1.4289 0.00 0.550 SCR SCR added by LADCO

55 79 241007800 S11 B22 01 10100202 NOX 2.907 3.300 1.4852 0.00 0.550 SCR SCR added by LADCO

55 79 241007800 S12 B23 01 10100202 NOX 2.327 2.642 1.1887 0.00 0.550 SCR SCR added by LADCO

55 79 241007800 S12 B24 01 10100202 NOX 2.343 2.659 1.1967 0.00 0.550 SCR SCR added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 10.374 11.777 5.2 995

cyid 25.123 28.519 16.3281

STID=55 CYID=117 fcid=460033090 name=WP & L Alliant Energy

- Edgewater Gen Station

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

55 117 460033090 S11 B23 01 10100203 NOX 1.620 1.839 1.103 2 0.00 0.400 SCR SCR added by LADCO55 117 460033090 S11 B24 01 10100203 NOX 4.107 4.662 3.8232 0.00 0.180 SCR SCR added by LADCO

5 5 117 460033090 S12 B25 01 10100221 NOX 5.680 6.448 5.4811 0.00 0.150 SCR SCR added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 11.407 12.949 10.4074

cyid 11.407 12.949 10.4074

stid 36.530 41.469 26.735 5

======== ======== ==========

291.931 324.149 95.1624SO2

– 2009

Point Source Grown and Controlled Emissions by facility for SO2 r6s1b_2009 1

Base Year = 2002

Future Year = 2009

STID=19 CYID=115 fcid=58

- 07

- 001 name=MIDAMERICAN ENERGY CO.

- LOUISA STATION

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Cont rol EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

19 115 58

- 07

- 001 117487 147281 99 10100222 SO2 33.664 34.774 3.4774 0.0 0.90 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=21 CYID=161 fc

id=2116100009 name=EAST KY POWER COOP

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

21 161 2116100009 1 001 99 10100202 SO2 42.166 42.103 4.2103 0.0 0.90 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

21 161 2116100009 2 002 99 10100212 SO2 55.385 55.303 5.5303 0.0 0.90 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 97.551 97.406 9.7406

cyid 97.551 97.406 9.7406

stid 9 7.551 97.406 9.7406

STID=27 CYID=141 fcid=2714100004 name=NSP

- Sherburne Generating Plant

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

27 141 271410

0004 SV001 EU001 001 10100222 SO2 16.765 16.987 3.6401 0.3 0.85 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

27 141 2714100004 SV001 EU002 001 10100222 SO2 22.549 22. 848 4.8959 0.3 0.85 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 39.314 39.834 8.5360

cyid 39.314 39.834 8.5360

stid 39.314 39.834 8.5360

STID=54 CYID=51 fcid= 0005 name=OHIO POWER

- MITCHELL PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

54 51 0005 012 001 99 10100202 SO2 17.775 17.748 1.7748 0.0 0.90 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

54 51 0005 012 002 99 10100202 SO2 5.689 5.680 0.5680 0.0 0.90 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 23.463 23.428 2.3428

cyid 23.463 23.428 2.3428

STID=54 CYID=53 fcid=0009 name=APPALACHIAN POWER

- MOUNTAINEER PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

54 53 0009 001 001 99 10100202 SO2 11.196 11.179 1.1179 0.0 0.90 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=54 CYID=79 fcid= 0006 name=APPALACHIAN POWER

- JOHN E AMOS PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes54 79 0006 012 001 99 10100202 SO2 79.635 79.516 7.9516 0.0 0.90 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

54 79 0006 003 003 99 10100202 SO2 139.377 139.169 13.9169 0.0 0.90 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 219.012 218.685 21.8685

cyid 219.012 218.685 21.8685

stid 253.671 253.293 25.3293

======== ======== ==========

424.200 425.307 47.0832SO2

– 2012

Point Source Grown and Controlled Emissions by facility for SO2 r6s1b_2012 1

Base Year = 2002

Future Year = 2012

STID=17 CYID=31 fcid=031600AMI name=MIDWEST GENERATION L LC

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day To ns/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 31 031600AMI 0007 0010 01 10100226 SO2 16.13 18.39 1.839 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

ST ID=17 CYID=97 fcid=097190AAC name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 97 097190AAC 0018 0033 01 10100226 SO2 24.14 27.52 2.752 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

17 97 097190AAC 0021 0036 01 10100226 SO2 19.23 21.92 2.192 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

17 97 09719

0AAC 0016 0031 01 10100203 SO2 4.59 5.24 0.005 0.0 0.999 SHUTDOWN Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 47.96 54.68 4.950

cyid 47.96 54.68 4.950

STID=17 CYID=125 fcid=125804AAB name=DYNEGY MIDWEST GENERATION INC

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 125 125804AAB 0019 0023 01 10100202 SO2 22.34 25.47 3.821 0.0 0.850 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=17 CYID=127 fcid=127855AAC name=ELECTRIC ENERGY INC

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/D ay Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 127 127855AAC 0001 0001 01 10100222 SO2 11.83 13.48 13.482 0.0 0.000 LNB LNB added by LADCO

17 127 127855AAC 0001 0002 01 10100222 SO2 11.48 13.09 13.085 0.0 0.000 LNB LNB added by LADCO

17 127 127855AAC 0002 0003 01 10100222 SO2 10.25 11.68 11.680 0.0 0.000 LNB LNB added by LADCO

17 127 127855AAC 0002 0004 01 10100222 SO2 12.04 13.73 13.731 0.0 0.000 LNB LNB added by LADCO

17 127 127855AAC 0003 0006 01 10100222 SO2 12.68 14.46 14.456 0.0 0.000 LNB LNB added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 58.27 66.43 66.435

cyid 58.27 66.43 66.435

STID=17 CYID=135 fcid=135803AAA name=AMEREN ENERGY GENERATING C O

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Ton s/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 135 135803AAA 0001 0001 01 10100203 SO2 32.99 37.61 3.761 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

17 135 135803AAA 0001 0003 01 10100203 SO2 72.92 83.13 8.313 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 105.91 120.74 12.074

cyid 105.91 120.74 12.074STID=17 CYID=157 fcid=157851AAA name=DYNEGY MIDWEST GENERATION INC

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 157 157851AAA 0001 0001 01 10100203 SO2 25.14 28.66 4.299 0.0 0.850 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

17 157 157851AAA 0002 00 02 01 10100203 SO2 25.79 29.41 4.411 0.0 0.850 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

17 157 157851AAA 0013 0013 01 10100202 SO2 27.79 31.68 4.752 0.0 0.850 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 78.72 89.75 13.462

cyid 78.72 89.75 13.462

STID=17 CYID=167 fcid=167120AAO name=CITY WATER LIGHT & POWER

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 167 167120AAO 0010 0012 01 10100203 SO2 4 4.20 50.39 0.050 0.0 0.999 SHUTDOWN Scrubber added by LADCO

17 167 167120AAO 0010 0013 01 10100203 SO2 16.40 18.70 0.019 0.0 0.999 SHUTDOWN Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 60.61 69.10 0.06 9

cyid 60.61 69.10 0.069

STID=17 CYID=179 fcid=179801AAA name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid p rid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 179 179801AAA 0018 0029 01 10100203 SO2 25.35 28.90 2.890 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

17 179 179801AAA 0018 0031 01 10100203 SO2 41.57 47.39 4.739 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 66.91 76.29 7.629

cyid 66.91 76.29 7.629

STID=17 CYID=197 fcid=197810AAK name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Ton s/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 197 197810AAK 0013 0010 03 10100501 SO2 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.0 0.999 SHUTDOWN Scrubber added by LADCO

17 197 197810AAK 0007 0012 02 10100223 SO2 15.33 17.48 0.017 0.0 0.999 SHUTDOWN Scrubber added by LADCO

17 197 197810AAK 0007 0012 03 101 00501 SO2 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.0 0.999 SHUTDOWN Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 15.33 17.48 0.017

cyid 15.33 17.48 0.017

stid 472.19 538.32 110.295

STID=19 CYID=115 fcid=58

- 07

- 001 name=MIDAMERICAN ENERGY CO.

- LOUISA STATION

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYI D fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

19 115 58

- 07

- 001 117487 147281 99 10100222 SO2 33.66 38.38 3.838 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=21 CYID=161 fcid=2116100009 name=EAST KY POWER COOP

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes21 161 2116100009 1 001 99 10100202 SO2 42.17 44.03 4.403 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

21 161 2116100009 2 002 99 10100212 SO2 55.39 57.84 5.784 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 97.55 101.87 10.187

cyid 97.55 101.87 10.187

stid 97.55 101.87 10.187

STID=27 CYID=61 fcid=27 06100004 name=Minnesota Power Inc

- Boswell Energy Ctr

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

27 61 2706100004 SV003 EU003 001 10100226 SO2 33.99 35.19 15.081 0.3 0.700 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

27 61 2706100004 SV003 EU003 002 10100501 SO2 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.3 0.700 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 33.99 35.19 15.081

cyid 33.99 35.19 15.081

STID=27 CYID=109 fcid=2710900011 name=Rochester Pu blic Utilities

- Silver Lake

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid T ons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

27 109 2710900011 SV003 EU004 001 10100202 SO2 7.86 8.13 1.220 0.0 0.850 SCRUBBER S crubber added by LADCO

STID=27 CYID=141 fcid=2714100004 name=NSP

- Sherburne Generating Plant

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID f

cid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

27 141 2714100004 SV001 EU001 001 10100222 SO2 16.76 17.36 3.719 0.3 0.850 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

27 141 2714100004 SV001 EU002 001 10100222 SO2 22.55 23.34 5.002 0.3 0.850 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 39.31 40.70 8.721

cyid 39.31 40.70 8.721

stid 81.16 84.02 25.023

STID=39 CYID=13 fcid=0607130015 name=R. E. BURGER PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Cont rol EF ctrltype ctrldes

39 13 0607130015 R6 B011 B011P1 10100202 SO2 29.83 31.15 3.115 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

39 13 0607130015 R7 B012 B012P1 10100202 SO2 34.77 36.31 3.631 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 64.60 67.46 6.746

cyid 64.60 67.46 6.746

STID=39 CYID=31 fcid=0616000000 name=CONESVILLE POWER PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

39 31 0616000000 R4 B004 B004P1 10100212 SO2 316.00 330.00 33.000 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- stid 380.60 397.46 39.746

STID=47 CYID=1 fcid=0009 name=TVA BULL RUN FOSSIL PLANTBase Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Da y Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

47 1 0009 S

- 1 001 99 10100212 SO2 130.81 133.01 13.301 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubbe r added by LADCO

STID=47 CYID=73 fcid=0007 name=TVA JOHN SEVIER FOSSIL PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stk id dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

47 73 0007 S

- 1A 001 99 10100212 SO2 20.15 20.49 2.0 49 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 73 0007 S

- 1B 002 99 10100212 SO2 20.25 20.59 2.059 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 73 0007 S

- 2A 003 99 10100212 SO2 19.62 19.95 1.995 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 73 0007 S

- 2B 004 99 10100212 SO2 18.93 19.25 1.925 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 78.95 80.28 8.028

cyid 78.95 80.2 8 8.028

STID=47 CYID=85 fcid=0011 name=TVA JOHNSONVILLE FOSSIL PLANT

Base Yr Grown Contr olled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

47 85 0011 S1

- 01 001 99 10100212 SO2 17.06 17.35 1.735 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 85 0011 S1

- 04 004 99 10100212 SO2 19.85 20.18 2.018 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 85 0011 S1

- 05 005 99 10100212 SO2 24.11 24.52 2.452 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 61.02 62.04 6.204

cyid 61.02 62.04 6.204

STID=47 CYID=145 fcid=0013 name =TVA KINGSTON FOSSIL PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Ton s/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

47 145 0013 S

- 1 001 99 10100202 SO2 12.68 12.89 1.289 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scr ubber added by LADCO

47 145 0013 S

- 1 002 99 10100202 SO2 14.00 14.24 1.424 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 145 0013 S

- 1 003 9 9 10100202 SO2 13.80 14.04 1.404 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 145 0013 S

- 1 004 99 10100202 SO2 12.24 12.44 1.244 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 145 0013 S

- 1 005 99 10100202 SO2 19.57 19.90 1.990 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 145 0013 S

- 2 006 99 10100202 SO2 18.92 19.24 1.924 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 145 0013 S

- 2 007 99 10100202 SO2 21.30 21.66 2.166 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 145 0013 S

- 2 008 99 10100202 SO2 18.54 18.85 1.885 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBE R Scrubber added by LADCO

47 145 0013 S

- 2 009 99 10100202 SO2 20.72 21.07 2.107 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 151.77 154.33 15.433

cyid 151.77 154.33 15.433

STID=47 CYID=165 fcid=0025 name=TVA GALLATIN FOSSIL PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Cont rol EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

47 165 0025 S

- 01 001 99 10100212 SO2 13.91 14.14 1.414 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 165 00

25 S

- 01 002 99 10100212 SO2 14.87 15.12 1.512 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 165 0025 S

- 02 003 99 10100212 SO2 16.33 16.60 1.660 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 165 0025 S

- 02 004 99 10100212 SO2 20.39 20.73 2.073 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Sc rubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ----------fcid 65.49 66.59 6.659

cyid 65.49 66.59 6.659

stid 488.04 496.25 49.625

STID=54 CYID=51 fcid=0005 name=OHIO POWER

- MITCHELL PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

54 51 0005 012 001 99 10100202 SO2 17.77 18.56 1.856 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

54 51 0005 012 002 99 10100202 SO2 5.69 5.94 0.594 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- --- ----- ---------- fcid 23.46 24.50 2.450

cyid 23.46 24.50 2.450

STID=54 CYID=53 fcid=0009 name=APPALACHIAN POWER

- MOUNTAINEER PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

54 53 0009 001 001 99 10100202 SO2 11.20 11.69 1.169 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=54 CYID=79 fcid=0006 name=APPALACHIAN POWER

- JOHN E A MOS PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

54 79 0006 012 001 99 10100202 SO2 79.63 83.16 8.316 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LA DCO

54 79 0006 012 002 99 10100202 SO2 100.33 104.78 10.478 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

54 79 0006 003 003 99 10100202 SO2 139.38 145.55 14.555 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 319.35 333.50 33.350

cyid 319.35 3 33.50 33.350

stid 354.00 369.69 36.969

STID=55 CYID=79 fcid=241007690 name=WIS ELECTRIC POWER OAK CREEK STATION

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

55 79 241007690 S13 B25 01 10100202 SO2 12.75 14.5 4 3.490 0.0 0.760 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

55 79 241007690 S13 B26 01 10100202 SO2 8.68 9.89 2.473 0.0 0.750 SCRUBBER Scrubber add ed by LADCO

55 79 241007690 S14 B27 01 10100212 SO2 10.97 12.51 2.876 0.0 0.770 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

55 79 241007690 S14 B28 01 10100212 SO2 11.28 12.86 2.958 0.0 0.770 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 43.68 49.80 11.797

cyid 43.6 8 49.80 11.797

stid 43.68 49.80 11.797

======== ======== ==========

1950.90 2075.80 287.480SO2

– 2018

Point Source Grown and Controlled Emissions by facility for SO2 r6s1b_2018 1

Base Year = 2002

Future Year = 2018

STID=17 CYID=31 fcid=031600AIN name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 31 031600AIN 0010 0013 01 10100226 SO2 10.92 12.39 1.239 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

17 31 031600AIN 0012 0016 01 10100226 SO2 17.69 20.08 2.008 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 28.61 32.48 3.248

STID=17 CYID=31 fcid=031600AMI name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 31 031600AMI 0007 0010 01 10100226 SO2 16.13 18.31 1.831 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- cyid 44.74 50.79 5.079

STID=17 CYID =79 fcid=079808AAA name=AMEREN ENERGY GENERATING CO

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 79 079808AAA 0003 0003 01 10100202 SO2 36.35 41.27 4.127 0.0 0. 900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

17 79 079808AAA 0012 0013 01 10100501 SO2 28.99 19.46 1.946 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 65.34 60.72 6.072

cyid 65.34 60.72 6.072

STID=17 CYID=97 fcid=097190AAC name=MIDWEST GENERATIO N LLC

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 97 097190AAC 0018 0033 01 10100226 SO2 24.14 27.40 2.740 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

17 97 097190AAC 0021 0036 01 10100226 SO2 19.23 21.83 2.183 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

17 97 097190AAC 0016 0031 01 10100203 SO2 4.59 5.22 0.005 0.0 0.999 SHUTDOWN Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 47.96 54.45 4.928

cyid 47.96 54.4 5 4.928

STID=17 CYID=125 fcid=125804AAB name=DYNEGY MIDWEST GENERATION INC

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 125 125804AAB 0019 0023 01 10100202 SO2 22.34 25.36 3.805 0.0 0.850 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=17 CYID=127 fcid=127855AAC name=ELECTRIC ENERGY INC

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes17 127 127855AAC 0002 0003 01 10100222 SO2 10.25 11.63 11.630 0.0 0.000 LNB LNB added by LADCO

17 127 127855AAC 0002 0004 01 10100222 SO2 12.04 13.67 13.673 0.0 0.000 LNB LNB added by LADCO

17 127 127855AAC 0001 0001 01 10100222 SO2 11.83 13.42 1.342 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

17 127 127855AAC 0001 0002 01 10100222 SO2 11.48 13.03 1.303 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

17 127 1 27855AAC 0003 0005 01 10100222 SO2 11.72 13.31 1.331 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

17 127 127855AAC 0003 0006 01 10100222 SO2 12.68 14.39 1.439 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 70.00 79.46 30.719

cyid 70.00 79.46 30.719

STID=17 CYID=135 fcid=135803AAA name=AMEREN ENERGY GENERATING CO

Base Yr Grown Controlled Bas e Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 135 135803AAA 0001 0001 01 10100203 SO2 32.99 37.45 3.745 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

17 135 135803AAA 0001 0003 01 10100203 SO2 72.92 82.77 8.277 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 10 5.91 120.22 12.022

cyid 105.91 120.22 12.022

STID=17 CYID=143 fcid=143805AAG name=AES ED EDWARDS STATION

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 143 143805AAG 0002 0004 01 10100202 SO2 15.28 17.34 1.734 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=17 CYID=157 fcid=157851AAA name=DYNEGY MIDWEST GENERATION INC

Base Yr Grown C ontrolled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 157 157851AAA 0001 0001 01 10100203 SO2 25.14 28.54 4.281 0.0 0.850 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

17 157 157851AAA 0002 0002 01 10100203 SO2 25.79 29.28 4.3 92 0.0 0.850 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

17 157 157851AAA 0013 0013 01 10100202 SO2 27.79 31.54 4.732 0.0 0.850 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 78.72 89.36 13.404

cyid 78.72 89.36 13.404

STID=17 CYID=167 fcid=16712 0AAO name=CITY WATER LIGHT & POWER

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc poli d Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 167 167120AAO 0010 0012 01 10100203 SO2 44.20 50.18 0.050 0.0 0.999 SHUTDOW N Scrubber added by LADCO

17 167 167120AAO 0010 0013 01 10100203 SO2 16.40 18.62 0.019 0.0 0.999 SHUTDOWN Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 60.61 68.80 0.069

cyid 60.61 68.80 0.069

STID=17 CYID=179 fcid=179801AAA name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Co ntrol EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 179 179801AAA 0018 0029 01 10100203 SO2 25.35 28.77 2.877 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

17 179 179801AAA 0018 0031 01 10100203 SO2 41.57 47.19 4.719 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- ------- - -------- ----------fcid 66.91 75.96 7.596

cyid 66.91 75.96 7.596

STID=17 CYID=197 fcid=197809AAO name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 197 197809AAO 0006 0009 01 10100203 SO2 15.89 18.04 1.804 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

17 197 197809AAO 0016 0031 01 1 0100202 SO2 27.43 31.13 3.113 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

17 197 197809AAO 0017 0033 01 10100202 SO2 23.13 26.26 2.626 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 66.45 75.44 7.544

STID=17 CYID=197 fcid=197810AAK name=MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

17 197 197810AAK 0009 0014 02 10100222 SO2 11.64 13.21 1.321 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

17 197 197810AAK 0011 0016 02 10100222 SO2 25.67 29.14 2.914 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

17 197 197810AAK 0013 0010 03 10100501 SO2 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.0 0.999 SHUTDOWN Scrubber added by LADCO

17 197 197810AAK 0007 0012 02 10100223 SO2 15.33 17.40 0.017 0.0 0.999 SHUTDOWN Scrubber added by LADCO

17 197 197810AAK 0007 0012 03 101005 01 SO2 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.0 0.999 SHUTDOWN Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 52.64 59.75 4.252

cyid 119.09 135.19 11.796

stid 696.90 777.66 97.225

STID=18 CYID=147 fcid=00020 name=INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER

- ROCKPORT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

18 147 00020 1 001 01 10100222 SO2 66.42 72.32 7.232 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

18 147 00020 1 001 02 10100501 SO2 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 66.42 72.32 7.232

cyid 66.42 72.32 7.232

stid 66.42 72.32 7.232

STID=19 CYID=115 fcid=58

- 07

- 001 name=MIDAMERICAN ENERGY CO.

- LOUISA STATION

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

19 115 58

- 07

- 001 117487 147281 99 10100222 SO2 33.66 38.22 3.822 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=21 CYID=127 fcid =2112700003 name=KENTUCKY POWER CO

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc poli d Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

21 127 2112700003 2 002 99 10100202 SO2 104.52 113.82 11.382 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBE R Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=21 CYID=161 fcid=2116100009 name=EAST KY POWER COOP

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes21 161 2116100009 1 001 99 10100202 SO2 42.17 45.92 4.592 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

21 161 2116100009 2 002 99 10100212 SO2 55.39 60.31 6.031 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 97.55 106.23 10.623

cyid 97.55 106.23 10.623

stid 202.07 220.04 22.004

STID=27 CYID=61 fcid=2706100004 name=Minnesota Power Inc

- Boswell Energy Ctr

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Cont rol EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

27 61 2706100004 SV003 EU003 001 10100226 SO2 33.99 39.15 16.778 0.3 0.700 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

27 61 27

06100004 SV003 EU003 002 10100501 SO2 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.3 0.700 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 33.99 39.15 16.778

cyid 33.99 39.15 16.778

STID=27 CYID=109 fcid=2710900011 name=Rochester Public Utilities

- Silver Lake

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF c trltype ctrldes

27 109 2710900011 SV003 EU004 001 10100202 SO2 7.86 9.05 1.357 0.0 0.850 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=27 CYID=141 fcid=2714100004 name=NSP

- Sherburne Generating Plant

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid To ns/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

27 141 2714100004 SV001 EU001 001 10100222 SO2 16.76 19.31 4.138 0.3 0.850 SCRUBBER Sc rubber added by LADCO

27 141 2714100004 SV001 EU002 001 10100222 SO2 22.55 25.97 5.565 0.3 0.850 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 39.31 45.28 9.703

cyid 39.31 45.28 9.703

stid 81.16 93.48 27.838

STID=39 CYID=13 fcid=0607130015 name=R. E. BURGER PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

39 13 0607130015 R6 B011 B011P1 10100202 SO2 29.83 32.48 3.248 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

39 13 0607130015 R7 B012 B012P1 10100202 SO2 34.77 37. 86 3.786 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 64.60 70.34 7.034

cyid 64.60 70.34 7.034

STID=39 CYID=31 fcid=0616000000 name=CONESVILLE POWER PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Futur e Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

39 31 0616000000 R4 B004 B004P1 10100212 SO2 316.00 344.11 34.411 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=39 CYID=167 fcid=0684000000 name=MUSKINGUM RIVER POWER PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes39 167 0684000000 R2 B002 B002P1 10100201 SO2 65.07 70.85 7.085 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R2 B002 B002P2 10100501 SO2 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R3 B003 B003P1 10100201 SO2 94.58 103.00 10.300 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBE R Scrubber added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R3 B003 B003P2 10100501 SO2 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R4 B00 4 B004P1 10100203 SO2 81.64 88.90 8.890 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R4 B004 B004P2 10100501 SO2 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R5 B005 B005P1 10100203 SO2 97.22 105.87 10.587 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

3 9 167 0684000000 R5 B005 B005P2 10100501 SO2 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R6 B006 B006P1 10100202 SO 2 113.96 124.10 12.410 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

39 167 0684000000 R6 B006 B006P2 10100501 SO2 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 452.48 492.72 49.272

cyid 452.48 492.72 49.272

stid 833.08 907.16 90.716

STID=47 CYID=1 fcid=0009 name=TVA BULL RUN FOSSIL PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

47 1 0009 S

- 1 001 99 10100212 SO2 130.81 136.82 13.682 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

STID=47 CY ID=73 fcid=0007 name=TVA JOHN SEVIER FOSSIL PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

47 73 0007 S

- 1A 001 99 10100212 SO2 20.15 21.07 2.107 0.0 0.90 0 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 73 0007 S

- 1B 002 99 10100212 SO2 20.25 21.18 2.118 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 73 0007 S

- 2A 003 99 10100212 SO2 19.62 20.52 2.052 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 73 0007 S

- 2B 004 99 10100212 SO2 18.93 19.8 0 1.980 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 78.95 82.57 8.257

cyid 78.95 82.57 8.257

STID=47 CYID=85 fcid=0011 name=TVA JOHNSONVILLE FOSSIL PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Futur e Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

47 85 0011 S1

- 01 001 99 10100212 SO2 17.06 17.84 1.784 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 85 0011 S1

- 04 004 99 10100212 SO2 19.85 20.76 2.076 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 85 0011 S1

- 05 005 99 10100212 SO2 24.11 25.22 2.522 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 61.02 63.82 6.382

cyid 61.02 63.82 6.382

STID=47 CYID=145 fcid=0013 name=TVA KINGSTON FOSSIL PLAN T

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Ton s/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

47 145 0013 S

- 1 001 99 10100202 SO2 12.68 13.26 1.326 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 145 0013 S

- 1 002 99 10100202 SO2 14.00 14.65 1.465 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO47 145 0013 S

- 1 003 99 10100202 SO2 13.80 14.44 1.444 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 145 0013 S

- 1 004 99 10100202 SO2 12.24 12.80 1.280 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 145 0013 S

- 1 005 99 10100202 SO2 19.57 20.47 2.047 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 145 0013 S

- 2 006 99 10100202 SO2 18.92 19.79 1.979 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 145 0013 S

- 2 007 99 10100202 SO2 21.30 22.28 2.228 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 145 0013 S

- 2 008 99 10100202 SO2 18.54 19.39 1.939 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LA DCO

47 145 0013 S

- 2 009 99 10100202 SO2 20.72 21.68 2.168 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 151.77 158.75 15.875

cyid 151.77 158.75 15.875

STID=47 CYID=165 fcid=0025 name=TVA GALLATIN FOSSIL PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

47 165 0025 S

- 01 001 99 10100212 SO2 13.91 14.54 1.454 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 165 0025 S

- 01 002 99 10100212 SO2 14.87 15.56 1.556 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 165 0025 S

- 02 003 99 10100212 SO2 16.33 17.08 1.708 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

47 165 0025 S

- 02 004 99 10100212 SO2 20.39 21.32 2.132 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

--- - -------- -------- ---------- fcid 65.49 68.50 6.850

cyid 65.49 68.50 6.850

stid 488.04 510.46 51.046

STID=54 CYID=39 fcid=0006 name=APPALACHIAN POWER

- KANAWHA RIVER PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

54 39 0006 012 001 99 10100202 SO2 19.45 21.18 10.591 0.0 0.500 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

54 39 0006 012 002 99 10100202 SO2 20.94 22.80 11.399 0.0 0.500 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- --- ------- fcid 40.39 43.98 21.990

cyid 40.39 43.98 21.990

STID=54 CYID=51 fcid=0005 name=OHIO POWER

- MITCHELL PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

54 51 0005 012 001 99 10100202 SO2 17.77 19.36 1.936 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

54 51 0005 012 002 99 10100202 SO2 5.69 6.19 0.619 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 23.46 25.55 2.555

STID=54 CYID=51 fcid=0006 name=OHIO POWER

- KAMMER PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

54 51 0006 013 001 99 10100203 SO2 47.06 51.25 5.125 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

54 51 0006 013 002 99 10100203 SO2 47.66 51.90 5.190 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

54 51 0006 013 003 99 10100203 SO2 41.94 45.67 4.567 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO---- -------- -------- ----------

fcid 136.67 148.82 14.882

cyid 160.13 174.37 17.437

STID=54 CYID=53 fcid=0001 name=APPALACHIAN POWER CO.

- PHILIP SPORN PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID C YID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

54 53 0001 014 001 99 10100202 SO2 18.6 5 20.31 2.031 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

54 53 0001 014 002 99 10100202 SO2 15.87 17.28 1.728 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

54 53 0001 014 003 99 10100202 SO2 21.46 23.36 2.336 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

54 53 0001 014 004 99 10100202 SO2 20.53 22.36 2.236 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

54 53 0001 005 005 99 10100202 SO2 46.82 50.98 5.098 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 123.33 134.30 13.430

STID=54 CYID=53 fcid=0009 name=APPALACHIAN POWER

- MOUNTAINEER PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

54 53 0009 001 001 99 10100202 SO2 11.20 12.19 1.219 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- --- ----- -------- ---------- cyid 134.53 146.49 14.649

STID=54 CYID=79 fcid=0006 name=APPALACH IAN POWER

- JOHN E AMOS PLANT

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

54 79 0006 012 001 99 10100202 SO2 79.63 86.72 8.672 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

54 79 0006 012 002 99 10100202 SO2 100.33 109.26 10.926 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

54 79 0006 003 003 99 10100202 SO2 139.38 151.77 15.177 0.0 0.900 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ---------- fcid 319.35 347.75 34.775

cyid 319.35 347.75 34.775

stid 654.39 712.59 88.851

STID=55 CYID=79 fcid=241007690 name=WIS ELECTRIC POWER OAK CREEK STATION

Base Yr Grown Controlled Base Year Future Year

STID CYID fcid stkid dvid prid scc polid Tons/Day Tons/Day Tons/Day Control EF Control EF ctrltype ctrldes

55 79 241007690 S13 B25 01 10100202 SO2 12.75 14.48 3.475 0.0 0.760 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

55 79 241007690 S13 B26 01 10100202 SO2 8.68 9.85 2.462 0.0 0.750 SCR UBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

55 79 241007690 S14 B27 01 10100212 SO2 10.97 12.45 2.864 0.0 0.770 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

55 79 241007690 S14 B28 01 10100212 SO2 11.28 12.81 2.945 0.0 0.770 SCRUBBER Scrubber added by LADCO

---- -------- -------- ------ ---- fcid 43.68 49.59 11.746

cyid 43.68 49.59 11.746

stid 43.68 49.59 11.746

======== ======== ==========

3099.41 3 381.52 400.481

# Appendix II

Scenario C Controls (CAMD List)

### 1 

## NOx Controls (SCRs , 2007

– 2013) )

Plant Name UniqueID_Final State Name County Capacity

MW On Line

Year SCR

Online

Year

Chesterfield 3797_B_4 Virginia Chesterfield 166 1960 2013

Chesterfield 3797_B_5 Virginia Chesterfield 310 1964 2012

Scherer 6257_B_3 Georgia Monroe 875 1987 2011

Chesterfield 3797_B_6 Virginia Chesterfield 658 1969 2011

Sandow No 4 6648_B_4 Texas Milam 545 1981 2011

Beech Hollow Power Project 82704_B_1 Pennsylvania Washington 272 2011 2011

Longview Power 82702_B_1 West Virginia Monongalia 695 201 1 2011

Cliffside 2721_B_6 North Carolina Cleveland 800 2011 2011

AES Westover 2526_B_11 New York Broome 22 1943 2010

AES Westover 2526_B_12 New York Broome 22 1943 2010

AES Westover 2526_B_13 New York Broome 84 1951 2010

Iatan 2 6065_B_2 Missouri Plat te 850 2010 2010

Southwest 6195_B_2 Missouri Greene 300 2010 2010

Trimble Station (LGE) 6071_B_2 Kentucky Trimble 732 2010 2010

Elm Road Generating Station 56068_B_2 Wisconsin Milwaukee 615 2010 2010

Clay Boswell 1893_B_3 Minnesota Itasca 350 1973 2009

Asheville 2706_B_2 North Carolina Buncombe 184 1971 2009

Conesville 2840_B_4 Ohio Coshocton 780 1973 2009

Marshall 2727_B_3 North Carolina Catawba 657 1969 2009

St Johns River Power Park 207_B_1 Florida Duval 626 1987 2009

Ghent 1356_B_2 Kentucky Car roll 469 1977 2009

Chalk Point LLC 1571_B_1 Maryland Prince George's 341 1964 2009

Chalk Point LLC 1571_B_2 Maryland Prince George's 342 1965 2009

San Juan 2451_B_2 New Mexico San Juan 320 1973 2009

Big Bend 645_B_BB01 Florida Hillsborough 411 1970 200 9

Big Bend 645_B_BB02 Florida Hillsborough 391 1973 2009

Big Bend 645_B_BB03 Florida Hillsborough 414 1976 2009

Nebraska City Unit 2 6096_B_2 Nebraska Otoe 663 2009 2009

Cross 130_B_4 South Carolina Berkeley 652 2009 2009

Springerville 8223_B_4 Arizon a Apache 400 2009 2009

Sandow 5 82010_B_5 Texas Milam 600 2009 2009

Oak Grove 82011_B_1 Texas Robertson 800 2009 2009

Oak Grove 82011_B_2 Texas Robertson 800 2009 2009

TS Power Plant 82013_B_1 Nevada Eureka 200 2009 2009

Plum Point Energy 82014_B_1 Ar kansas Mississippi 665 2009 2009

Comanche 470_B_3 Colorado Pueblo 750 2009 2009

Elm Road Generating Station 56068_B_1 Wisconsin Milwaukee 615 2009 2009

Two Elk Generating Station 55360_B_1 Wyoming Campbell 300 2009 2009

J K Spruce 7097_B_BLR2 Texas Bex ar 750 2009 2009

Dallman 963_B_34 Illinois Sangamon 200 2009 2009

AES Greenidge LLC 2527_B_4 New York Yates 27 1950 2008

AES Greenidge LLC 2527_B_5 New York Yates 27 1950 2008

AES Greenidge LLC 2527_B_6 New York Yates 106 1953 2008

Charles R Lowman 56 _B_2 Alabama Washington 238 1979 2008

Charles R Lowman 56_B_3 Alabama Washington 238 1980 2008

Barry 3_B_5 Alabama Mobile 750 1971 2008

St Johns River Power Park 207_B_2 Florida Duval 626 1988 2008

Morgantown Generating Plant 1573_B_2 Maryland Charles 620 1971 2008

### 2

Bailly 995_B_7 Indiana Porter 160 1962 2008

San Juan 2451_B_1 New Mexico San Juan 322 1976 2008

San Juan 2451_B_3 New Mexico San Juan 495 1979 2008

Weston 4078_B_4 Wisconsin Marathon 519 2008 2008

AES Deepwater 10670_B_AAB001 Texas Harri s 140 1986 2007

La Cygne 1241_B_1 Kansas Linn 724 1973 2007

Morgantown Generating Plant 1573_B_1 Maryland Charles 624 1970 2007

PSEG Hudson Generating Station 2403_B_2 New Jersey Hudson 583 1967 2007

San Juan 2451_B_4 New Mexico San Juan 506 1982 2007

Big Bend 645_B_BB04 Florida Hillsborough 457 1985 2007

Cross 130_B_3 South Carolina Berkeley 620 2007 2007

Wygen II 55479_B_4 Wyoming Campbell 90 2007 2007

Council Bluffs 1082_B_4 Iowa Pottawattamie 790 2007 2007



## SO2 Controls (FGDs, 2007

– 2012)

Plan t Name UniqueID_Final State Name County Capacity

MW On Line

Year Scrubber

Online

Year

James H Miller Jr 6002_B_1 Alabama Jefferson 684 1978 2011

James H Miller Jr 6002_B_2 Alabama Jefferson 687 1985 2011

James H Miller Jr 6002_B_3 Alabama Jefferson 687 1989 2011

James H Miller Jr 6002_B_4 Alabama Jefferson 688 1991 2011

Cape Fear 2708_B_5 North Carolina Chatham 143 1956 2011

Baldwin Energy Complex 889_B_1 Illinois Randolph 624 1970 2011

Baldwin Energy Complex 889_B_2 Illinois Randolph 629 1973 2011

Baldwin Energy Complex 889_B_3 Illinois Randolph 629 1975 2011

Scherer 6257_B_3 Georgia Monroe 875 1987 2011

Milton R Young 2823_B_B1 North Dakota Oliver 250 1970 2011

W H Sammis 2866_B_6 Ohio Jefferson 630 1969 2011

W H Sammis 2866_B_7 Ohio Jefferson 630 1971 2011

PSEG Hudson Generating Station 2403_B_2 New Jersey Hudson 583 1967 2011

John Sevier 3405_B_1 Tennessee Hawkins 176 1955 2011

John Sevier 3405_B_2 Tennessee Hawkins 176 1955 2011

John Sevier 3405_B_3 Tennessee Hawkins 176 1956 2011

John S evier 3405_B_4 Tennessee Hawkins 176 1957 2011

Beech Hollow Power Project 82704_B_1 Pennsylvania Washington 272 2011 2011

Longview Power 82702_B_1 West Virginia Monongalia 695 2011 2011

Cliffside 2721_B_6 North Carolina Cleveland 800 2011 2011

AES Gree nidge LLC 2527_B_4 New York Yates 27 1950 2010

AES Greenidge LLC 2527_B_5 New York Yates 27 1950 2010

Barry 3_B_5 Alabama Mobile 750 1971 2010

E C Gaston 26_B_5 Alabama Shelby 861 1974 2010

Warrick 6705_B_4 Indiana Warrick 300 1970 2010

Coffeen 861_B_ 01 Illinois Montgomery 340 1965 2010

Coffeen 861_B_02 Illinois Montgomery 560 1972 2010

Cardinal 2828_B_3 Ohio Jefferson 630 1977 2010

Brandon Shores 602_B_1 Maryland Anne Arundel 643 1984 2010

Brandon Shores 602_B_2 Maryland Anne Arundel 643 1991 2010

Monroe 1733_B_4 Michigan Monroe 775 1974 2010

Cliffside 2721_B_5 North Carolina Cleveland 550 1972 2010

Crystal River 628_B_4 Florida Citrus 720 1982 2010

Bowen 703_B_1BLR Georgia Bartow 713 1971 2010

### 3

Crist 641_B_6 Florida Escambia 302 1970 2010

Cri st 641_B_7 Florida Escambia 477 1973 2010

Clifty Creek 983_B_1 Indiana Jefferson 217 1955 2010

Clifty Creek 983_B_2 Indiana Jefferson 217 1955 2010

Clifty Creek 983_B_3 Indiana Jefferson 217 1955 2010

Clifty Creek 983_B_4 Indiana Jefferson 217 1955 201 0

Clifty Creek 983_B_5 Indiana Jefferson 217 1955 2010

Clifty Creek 983_B_6 Indiana Jefferson 217 1956 2010

Chalk Point LLC 1571_B_1 Maryland Prince George's 341 1964 2010

Chalk Point LLC 1571_B_2 Maryland Prince George's 342 1965 2010

Dickerson 1572_ B_1 Maryland Montgomery 182 1959 2010

Dickerson 1572_B_2 Maryland Montgomery 182 1960 2010

Dickerson 1572_B_3 Maryland Montgomery 182 1962 2010

R E Burger 2864_B_7 Ohio Belmont 156 1955 2010

R E Burger 2864_B_8 Ohio Belmont 156 1955 2010

Kyger Creek 2 876_B_1 Ohio Gallia 217 1955 2010

Kyger Creek 2876_B_2 Ohio Gallia 217 1955 2010

Kyger Creek 2876_B_3 Ohio Gallia 217 1955 2010

Kyger Creek 2876_B_4 Ohio Gallia 217 1955 2010

Kyger Creek 2876_B_5 Ohio Gallia 217 1955 2010

Cheswick 8226_B_1 Pennsylvani a Allegheny 580 1970 2010

PSEG Mercer Generating Station 2408_B_1 New Jersey Mercer 315 1960 2010

PSEG Mercer Generating Station 2408_B_2 New Jersey Mercer 310 1961 2010

Silver Lake 2008_B_4 Minnesota Olmsted 61 1969 2010

Kingston 3407_B_1 Tennessee Ro ane 135 1954 2010

Kingston 3407_B_2 Tennessee Roane 135 1954 2010

Kingston 3407_B_3 Tennessee Roane 135 1954 2010

Kingston 3407_B_4 Tennessee Roane 135 1954 2010

Kingston 3407_B_5 Tennessee Roane 177 1955 2010

Kingston 3407_B_6 Tennessee Roane 177 195 5 2010

Kingston 3407_B_7 Tennessee Roane 177 1955 2010

Kingston 3407_B_8 Tennessee Roane 177 1955 2010

Kingston 3407_B_9 Tennessee Roane 178 1955 2010

Sioux 2107_B_1 Missouri St. Charles 497 1967 2010

Sioux 2107_B_2 Missouri St. Charles 497 1968 2010

Chesterfield 3797_B_5 Virginia Chesterfield 310 1964 2010

Yorktown 3809_B_1 Virginia York 159 1957 2010

AES Westover 2526_B_11 New York Broome 22 1943 2010

AES Westover 2526_B_12 New York Broome 22 1943 2010

AES Westover 2526_B_13 New York Broome 84 1 951 2010

Iatan 2 6065_B_2 Missouri Platte 850 2010 2010

Southwest 6195_B_2 Missouri Greene 300 2010 2010

Trimble Station (LGE) 6071_B_2 Kentucky Trimble 732 2010 2010

Elm Road Generating Station 56068_B_2 Wisconsin Milwaukee 615 2010 2010

Cholla 113_B _3 Arizona Navajo 271 1980 2009

Mayo 6250_B_1A North Carolina Person 362 1983 2009

Mayo 6250_B_1B North Carolina Person 362 1983 2009

Conesville 2840_B_4 Ohio Coshocton 780 1973 2009

G G Allen 2718_B_1 North Carolina Gaston 162 1957 2009

G G Allen 271 8_B_2 North Carolina Gaston 162 1957 2009

G G Allen 2718_B_3 North Carolina Gaston 260 1959 2009

### 4

G G Allen 2718_B_4 North Carolina Gaston 275 1960 2009

G G Allen 2718_B_5 North Carolina Gaston 265 1961 2009

H L Spurlock 6041_B_1 Kentucky Mason 315 1977 2009

Crystal River 628_B_5 Florida Citrus 717 1984 2009

Deerhaven Generating Station 663_B_B2 Florida Alachua 228 1981 2009

Bowen 703_B_2BLR Georgia Bartow 718 1972 2009

Wansley 6052_B_2 Georgia Heard 892 1978 2009

E W Brown 1355_B_1 Kentucky Mercer 94 1957 2009

E W Brown 1355_B_2 Kentucky Mercer 160 1963 2009

E W Brown 1355_B_3 Kentucky Mercer 422 1971 2009

Ghent 1356_B_2 Kentucky Carroll 469 1977 2009

Fayette Power Project 6179_B_1 Texas Fayette 598 1979 2009

Fayette Power Project 6179_B_2 Texa s Fayette 598 1980 2009

Morgantown Generating Plant 1573_B_1 Maryland Charles 624 1970 2009

Morgantown Generating Plant 1573_B_2 Maryland Charles 620 1971 2009

PPL Brunner Island 3140_B_1 Pennsylvania York 321 1961 2009

PPL Brunner Island 3140_B_2 Penn sylvania York 378 1965 2009

Keystone 3136_B_1 Pennsylvania Armstrong 850 1967 2009

Keystone 3136_B_2 Pennsylvania Armstrong 850 1968 2009

Bull Run 3396_B_1 Tennessee Anderson 881 1967 2009

Bay Shore 2878_B_4 Ohio Lucas 215 1968 2009

Hatfields Ferry Po wer Station 3179_B_1 Pennsylvania Greene 530 1969 2009

Hatfields Ferry Power Station 3179_B_2 Pennsylvania Greene 530 1970 2009

Hatfields Ferry Power Station 3179_B_3 Pennsylvania Greene 530 1971 2009

Nebraska City Unit 2 6096_B_2 Nebraska Otoe 663 2009 2009

Cross 130_B_4 South Carolina Berkeley 652 2009 2009

Springerville 8223_B_4 Arizona Apache 400 2009 2009

Sandow 5 82010_B_5 Texas Milam 600 2009 2009

Oak Grove 82011_B_1 Texas Robertson 800 2009 2009

Oak Grove 82011_B_2 Texas Robertson 800 2009 2 009

TS Power Plant 82013_B_1 Nevada Eureka 200 2009 2009

Plum Point Energy 82014_B_1 Arkansas Mississippi 665 2009 2009

Comanche 470_B_3 Colorado Pueblo 750 2009 2009

Elm Road Generating Station 56068_B_1 Wisconsin Milwaukee 615 2009 2009

Two Elk Gene rating Station 55360_B_1 Wyoming Campbell 300 2009 2009

J K Spruce 7097_B_BLR2 Texas Bexar 750 2009 2009

Dallman 963_B_34 Illinois Sangamon 200 2009 2009

Charles R Lowman 56_B_1 Alabama Washington 86 1969 2008

John E Amos 3935_B_1 West Virginia Putnam 800 1971 2008

John E Amos 3935_B_2 West Virginia Putnam 800 1972 2008

Cholla 113_B_4 Arizona Navajo 380 1981 2008

Roxboro 2712_B_1 North Carolina Person 369 1966 2008

Roxboro 2712_B_3A North Carolina Person 341 1973 2008

Roxboro 2712_B_3B North Caroli na Person 341 1973 2008

Miami Fort 2832_B_7 Ohio Hamilton 500 1975 2008

Miami Fort 2832_B_8 Ohio Hamilton 500 1978 2008

Cogentrix Virginia Leasing Corp 10071_B_2A Virginia Portsmouth 19 1988 2008

Cogentrix Virginia Leasing Corp 10071_B_2B Virginia Port smouth 19 1988 2008

Cogentrix Virginia Leasing Corp 10071_B_2C Virginia Portsmouth 19 1988 2008

J M Stuart 2850_B_1 Ohio Adams 585 1971 2008

J M Stuart 2850_B_2 Ohio Adams 597 1970 2008

### 5

J M Stuart 2850_B_3 Ohio Adams 597 1972 2008

J M Stuart 2850_B_4 Ohio Adams 597 1974 2008

Monroe 1733_B_3 Michigan Monroe 795 1973 2008

Belews Creek 8042_B_1 North Carolina Stokes 1,115 1974 2008

Belews Creek 8042_B_2 North Carolina Stokes 1,115 1975 2008

Bowen 703_B_3BLR Georgia Bartow 902 1974 2008

Bowen 703_B_4B LR Georgia Bartow 929 1975 2008

Hammond 708_B_1 Georgia Floyd 112 1954 2008

Hammond 708_B_2 Georgia Floyd 112 1954 2008

Hammond 708_B_3 Georgia Floyd 112 1955 2008

Hammond 708_B_4 Georgia Floyd 510 1970 2008

Wansley 6052_B_1 Georgia Heard 891 1976 200 8

Harding Street 990_B_70 Indiana Marion 435 1973 2008

Cogentrix Hopewell 10377_B_1A Virginia Hopewell (city) 18 1987 2008

Cogentrix Hopewell 10377_B_1B Virginia Hopewell (city) 18 1987 2008

Cogentrix Hopewell 10377_B_1C Virginia Hopewell (city) 18 198 7 2008

Ghent 1356_B_4 Kentucky Carroll 478 1984 2008

Council Bluffs 1082_B_3 Iowa Pottawattamie 690 1978 2008

PPL Brunner Island 3140_B_3 Pennsylvania York 749 1969 2008

PPL Montour 3149_B_1 Pennsylvania Montour 774 1972 2008

PPL Montour 3149_B_2 Penn sylvania Montour 766 1973 2008

Comanche 470_B_1 Colorado Pueblo 366 1973 2008

Comanche 470_B_2 Colorado Pueblo 370 1975 2008

Cayuga 1001_B_2 Indiana VermilIon 473 1972 2008

Winyah 6249_B_1 South Carolina Georgetown 295 1975 2008

Winyah 6249_B_2 South Carolina Georgetown 295 1977 2008

Winyah 6249_B_3 South Carolina Georgetown 295 1980 2008

Chesterfield 3797_B_6 Virginia Chesterfield 658 1969 2008

Brayton Point 1619_B_1 Massachusetts Bristo 243 1963 2008

Brayton Point 1619_B_2 Massachusetts Bristo 24 4 1964 2008

Weston 4078_B_4 Wisconsin Marathon 519 2008 2008

Gorgas 8_B_10 Alabama Walker 690 1972 2007

Gorgas 8_B_8 Alabama Walker 165 1956 2007

Gorgas 8_B_9 Alabama Walker 175 1958 2007

John E Amos 3935_B_3 West Virginia Putnam 1,300 1973 2007

Moun taineer 6264_B_1 West Virginia Mason 1,300 1980 2007

Cardinal 2828_B_1 Ohio Jefferson 600 1967 2007

Cardinal 2828_B_2 Ohio Jefferson 600 1967 2007

Roxboro 2712_B_2 North Carolina Person 639 1968 2007

Roxboro 2712_B_4A North Carolina Person 343 1980 200 7

Roxboro 2712_B_4B North Carolina Person 343 1980 2007

Cogentrix Virginia Leasing Corp 10071_B_1A Virginia Portsmouth 19 1988 2007

Cogentrix Virginia Leasing Corp 10071_B_1B Virginia Portsmouth 19 1988 2007

Cogentrix Virginia Leasing Corp 10071_B_1C V irginia Portsmouth 19 1988 2007

Killen Station 6031_B_2 Ohio Adams 615 1982 2007

Marshall 2727_B_2 North Carolina Catawba 378 1966 2007

Marshall 2727_B_3 North Carolina Catawba 657 1969 2007

Cogentrix Hopewell 10377_B_2A Virginia Hopewell (city) 18 198 7 2007

Cogentrix Hopewell 10377_B_2B Virginia Hopewell (city) 18 1987 2007

Cogentrix Hopewell 10377_B_2C Virginia Hopewell (city) 18 1987 2007

Ghent 1356_B_3 Kentucky Carroll 478 1981 2007

### 6

Louisa 6664_B_101 Iowa Louisa 700 1983 2007

Allen S King 1915_ B_1 Minnesota Washington 571 1968 2007

Mitchell 3948_B_1 West Virginia Marshall 800 1971 2007

Gibson 6113_B_1 Indiana Gibson 630 1975 2007

Gibson 6113_B_2 Indiana Gibson 628 1975 2007

Winyah 6249_B_4 South Carolina Georgetown 270 1981 2007

Pleasant Pr airie 6170_B_2 Wisconsin Kenosha 617 1985 2007

Cross 130_B_3 South Carolina Berkeley 620 2007 2007

Wygen II 55479_B_4 Wyoming Campbell 90 2007 2007

Council Bluffs 1082_B_4 Iowa Pottawattamie 790 2007 2007



## Assumed BART Facilities and Units

State County Fac ID Facilit y Name Unit ID

MI Bay B2840 CE

- KARN/WEADOCK EU00036

MI Bay B2840 CE

- KARN/WEADOCK EU00037

MI Eaton B4001 LAN. BW&L ERICKSON EU00007

MI Houghton B6553 UP POWER CO / PORTAGE EU00008

MI Huron B2815 DTE

- HARBOR BEACH EU00009

MI Ingham B2647 LAN. BW&L Eckert RG00023

MI Ingham B2647 LAN. BW&L Eckert RG00023

MI Ingham B2647 LAN. BW&L Eckert RG00023

MI Ingham B2647 LAN. BW&L Moores Park RG00021

MI Marquette B4261 WE

- ENERGIES EU00029

MI Marquette B4261 WE

- ENERGIES EU00030

MI Marq uette B4261 WE

- ENERGIES EU00031

MI Marquette B4261 WE

- ENERGIES EU00032

MI Marquette B4261 WE

- ENERGIES EU00033

MI Monroe B2816 DTE

- MONROE EU00062

MI Monroe B2816 DTE

- MONROE EU00068

MI Monroe B2816 DTE

- MONROE EU00063

MI Monroe B2816 DTE

- MONROE EU00064

MI Ottawa B2835 CE

– CAMPBELL EU00062

MI Ottawa B2835 CE

– CAMPBELL EU00061

MI Saint Clair B2796 DTE

- ST. CLAIR / BELLE RIVER EU00111

MI Saint Clair B6145 DTE

– GREENWOOD EU00009

MI Wayne B2132 WYANDOTTE EU00036

MI Wayne B2185 DET ROIT PLD, MISTERSKY EU00014

MI Wayne B2811 DTE

– TRENTON EU00035

OH Lake 0243160009 CEI., EASTLAKE PLANT B005

OH 0247030013 Orion Power Midwest B012

OH 0285010188 Dept of Public Utilities, City of Orrville B001

OH 0285010188 Dept of Public Utilities, City of Orrville B004

OH 0448020006 Toledo Edison Co., Bay Shore B003

OH 0448020006 Toledo Edison Co., Bay Shor e B004

OH 0616000000 Conesville Power Plant B003

OH 0616000000 Conesville Power Plant B004

OH 0616000000 Conesville Power Pl ant B007

OH 0641050002 Cardinal Power Pl ant B001

OH 0641050002 Cardinal Power Pl ant B002

### 7

OH 0641050002 Cardinal Power Plant B003

OH 0641050002 Cardinal Power Pl ant B004

OH 0641050002 Cardinal Power Pl ant B008

OH 0641050002 Cardinal Power P l ant B009

OH 0641050002 Cardinal Power Plant B009

OH Jefferson 0641160017 W. H. SAMMIS PLANT B011

OH Jefferson 0641160017 W. H. SAMMIS PLANT B012

OH Jefferson 0641160017 W. H. SAMMIS PLANT B013

OH 0684000000 Muskingum River Power Plant B006

OH Ada ms 0701000007 DP&L, J.M. Stuart Generating Station B001

OH Adams 0701000007 DP&L, J.M. Stuart Generating Station B002

OH Adams 0701000007 DP&L, J.M. Stuart Generating Station B003

OH Adams 0701000007 DP&L, J.M. Stuart Generating Station B004

OH 070100 0060 DP&L, Killen Station B001

OH 1409040243 City of Hamilton Dept of Public Utilities B002

OH 1409040243 City of Hamilton Dept of Public Utilities B008

OH 1409040243 City of Hamilton Dept of Public Utilities B009

OH 1413100008 CG&E W. C. BECKJORD B005

OH 1413100008 CG&E W. C. BECKJORD B006

OH 1431350093 CG&E MIAMI FORT STATION B015

IL Peoria 856 Ameren

– Edwards 2

IL Sangamon 963 CWLP

– Dallman 31

IL Sangamon 963 CWLP

– Dallman 32

IL Christian 876 Dominion

– Kincaid 1

IL Christian 87 6 Dominion

– Kincaid 2

WI COLUMBIA 111003090 Alliant En ergy

- Columbia Generating B20

WI COLUMBIA 111003090 Alliant En ergy

- Columbia Generating B21

WI COLUMBIA 111003090 Alliant En ergy

- Columbia Generating B22

WI GRANT 122014530 Alliant Energy, Nelso n Dewey B22 (unit 2)

WI MILWAUKEE 241007690 We Energies

- Oak Creek Station B26 (Unit 6)

WI MILWAUKEE 241007690 We Energies

- Oak Creek Station B27 (Unit 7)

WI MILWAUKEE 241007690 We Energies

- Oak Creek Station B28

WI MILWAUKEE 241007800 We Energies

- Valley Station B21

WI MILWAUKEE 241007800 We Energies

- Valley Station B23

WI MILWAUKEE 241007800 We Energies

- Valley Station B24

WI BRO WN 405031990 WI Public Service Corp

- JP Pulliam B27 (unit 8)

WI SHEBOYGAN 460033090 WP & L Allian t Energy

– Edgewater B24

W I BUFFALO 606034110 Dairyland Power Coop Alma Station

(J.P. Madgett boilers) B25 (+B26)

WI BUFFALO 606034110 Dairyland Power Coop Alma Station B27

WI VERNON 663020930 Dairyland Power Coop Genoa Station B20

WI VERNON 663020930 Dairyland Power Coop Genoa Station B25

IN Porter 995 Bailly 7

IN Porter 995 Bailly 8

IN Vermillion 1001 Cayuga 1

IN Vermillion 1001 Cayuga 2

IN Montgomery 1024 Crawfordsville 6

IN Warrick 1012 Culley 2

### 8

IN Warrick 1012 Culley 3

IN Gibson 6113 Gibson 1

IN Gibson 6113 Gi bson 2

IN Cass 1032 Logansport 6

IN Sullivan 6213 Merom 1

IN Sullivan 6213 Merom 2

IN LaPorte 997 Michigan City 12

IN Lake 996 Mitchell 11

IN Pike 994 Petersburg 1

IN Pike 994 Petersburg 2

IN Pike 994 Petersburg 3

IN Pike 1043 Ratts 1

IN Pike 104 3 Ratts 2

IN Wayne 7335 RPL 2

IN Jasper 6085 Schahfer 14

IN Jasper 6085 Schahfer 15

IN Lake 981 Stateline 4

IN Marion 990 Stout 70

IN Dearborn 988 Tanners Creek 4

IN Vigo 1010 Wabash River 6

IN Warrick 6705 Warrick 4

IA 07

- 02

- 005 Cedar Fal ls Utilities Unit #7 (EU10.1A)

IA 88

- 01

- 004 Central Iowa Power Cooperative

(CIPCO)

– Summit Lake Station Comb Turbines (EU

1 /1G , EU2 /2 G)

IA 70

- 08

- 003 Central Iowa Power Cooperative

(CIPCO)

– Fair Station Unit # 2 (EU 2 &

EU 2G)

IA 85

- 01

- 006 City of Am es

- Steam Electric Plant Boiler #7 (EU 2)

IA 29

- 01

- 013 Interstate Power & Light

- Burlington Main Plant Boiler.

IA 03

- 03

- 001 Interstate Power & Light

- Lansing Boiler #4. Sixteen

units in total.

IA 23

- 01

- 014 Interstate Power & Light

- ML Kapp Boiler #2. Six units

in total.

IA 57

- 01

- 042 Interstate Power & Light

- Prairie Creek Boiler #4. Fourteen

units in total.

IA 78

- 01

- 026 MidAmerican Energy Co

- Council Bluffs Boiler #3 (EU003)

IA 97

- 04

- 010 MidAmerican Energy Co

- Neal North Boilers #1

- 3

(EU0 01

- EU003)

IA 97

- 04

- 011 MidAmerican Energy Co

- Neal South Boiler #4 (EU003)

IA 70

- 01

- 011 Muscatine Power and Water Boiler #8

IA 63

- 02

- 005 Pella Municipal Power Plant Boilers #6

- 8

MN 2709900001 Austin Utilities NE Power Station EU001

MN 27 13700027 Hibbing Public Utilities EU003

MN 2703100001 MN Power, Taconite Harbor EU003

MN 2706100004 MN Power, Boswell Energy Center EU003

MN 2701500010 New Ulm Public Utilities EU003

- Boiler 4

MN 2711100002 Otter Tail Power Hoot Lake EU003

MN 27 10900011 Rochester Public Utilities, Silver Lake EU003

MN 2710900011 Rochester Public Utilities, Silver Lake EU004

MN 2713700028 Virginia Public Utilities EU003

- Boiler 9

MN 2714100004 Xcel Energy, Sherco EU001, EU002

MN 2716300005 Xcel Energy, Allen S King EU001

- Boiler 1

### 9

MN 2705300015 Xcel Energy, Riverside EU003

- Boiler 8

MO 290710003 Ameren

- Labadie B1, B2, B3, B4

MO 291830001 Ameren

- Sioux B1, B2

MO 290990016 Ameren

- Rush Island B1, B2

MO 290950031 Auila

- Sibley B3

- 5C

MO 291430004 Assoc. Electric

- New Madrid B1(EP

- 01), B2

(EP

- 02)

MO 290770039 City Utilities Springfield

- Southwest B1 (E09)

MO 290770005 City Utilities Springfield

- James River EO7, EO8

MO 290970001 Empire Distric Electric

- Asbury B7

MO 29083 0001 KC Power and Light

- Montrose EP08

MO 290210004 Aqula

- Lake Road EP06

MO 291750001 Assoc. Electric

- Thomas Hill EP01, EP02

MO 290950021 Trigen

- Kansas City B1A

MO 290190002 City of Columbia Municipal Power Plant EP02

MO 291950010 Marshall Munipal Utilities EP05

MO 290950050 Independence Power & Light

- Blue Valley B3 (EP05)

WV 3943 Fort Martin

WV 6004 Pleasants

WV 3948 Mitchell

WV 3935 Amos

WV 6264 Mountaineer

WV 3944 Harrison

TN 3396 TVA Bull Run

TN 3399 TVA Cumberland

KY 1363 Cane Run

KY 1364 Mill Creek

KY 6041 Spurlock

KY 1384 John Sherman Cooper

KY 1353 Big Sandy

KY 1356 Ghent

KY 1355 Brown

KY 1374 Owensboro Municipal

KY 1372 Henderson Municipal

KY 1378 Paradise

KY 1361 Coleman

KY 1382 Reid/Henderson 2

KY 6639 GreenToday's Date: 11/18/2011WEIRTONJANUARY 2005 (WEIRTON 01-05)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 13:42:20: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for January, 2005All FuelsTons/MonthCountyExhaustVOCExhaustNOxExhaustCOExhaustPM25ExhaustSO2ExhaustCO2CrankcaseVOCDiurnalVOCFIPSBrooke County5.0580.540.720.87 1,251.920.570.0015.4454009Hancock County4.4460.400.540.66 813.500.280.009.2154029Jefferson County13.58149.651.070.91 1,260.340.440.0012.963908123.06 37.61 290.592.322.44 3,325.77Totals:1.290.00page 1 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cWEIRTONJANUARY 2005 (WEIRTON 01-05)Today's Date: 11/18/2011Date of Model Run: Nov 03 13:42:20: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for January, 2005All FuelsTons/MonthCountyVaporDisplacementVOCTotalVOCSpillageVOCFIPSHot SoakVOCRunningLoss VOCTankPermeationVOCHosePermeationVOCBrooke County 0.056.210.16540090.030.090.150.12Hancock County0.055.480.20540290.030.100.220.16Jefferson County0.1416.210.67390810.140.590.320.340.23Totals:27.901.030.190.780.690.62page 2 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cToday's Date: 11/18/2011WEIRTONFEBRUARY 2005 (WEIRTON 02-05)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 13:53:00: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for February, 2005All FuelsTons/MonthCountyExhaustVOCExhaustNOxExhaustCOExhaustPM25ExhaustSO2ExhaustCO2CrankcaseVOCDiurnalVOCFIPSBrooke County5.0480.650.720.87 1,251.920.570.0415.4354009Hancock County4.4460.520.540.66 813.500.280.069.2054029Jefferson County13.56150.011.070.91 1,260.340.440.1012.933908123.03 37.55 291.172.322.44 3,325.77Totals:1.290.21page 1 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cWEIRTONFEBRUARY 2005 (WEIRTON 02-05)Today's Date: 11/18/2011Date of Model Run: Nov 03 13:53:00: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for February, 2005All FuelsTons/MonthCountyVaporDisplacementVOCTotalVOCSpillageVOCFIPSHot SoakVOCRunningLoss VOCTankPermeationVOCHosePermeationVOCBrooke County 0.056.240.16540090.030.090.150.11Hancock County0.055.530.20540290.030.100.220.16Jefferson County0.1416.280.67390810.140.590.310.340.24Totals:28.061.030.190.780.670.61page 2 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cWEIRTONMARCH 2005 (WEIRTON 03-05)Today's Date: 11/18/2011Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:03:41: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for March, 2005All FuelsTons/MonthCountyVaporDisplacementVOCTotalVOCSpillageVOCFIPSHot SoakVOCRunningLoss VOCTankPermeationVOCHosePermeationVOCBrooke County 0.1312.410.25540090.060.140.220.17Hancock County0.1714.810.31540290.080.180.330.24Jefferson County0.3433.920.96390810.331.280.470.510.64Totals:61.141.510.471.601.020.92page 2 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cToday's Date: 11/18/2011WEIRTONMARCH 2005 (WEIRTON 03-05)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:03:41: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for March, 2005All FuelsTons/MonthCountyExhaustVOCExhaustNOxExhaustCOExhaustPM25ExhaustSO2ExhaustCO2CrankcaseVOCDiurnalVOCFIPSBrooke County10.48116.660.880.98 1,457.560.570.3816.9154009Hancock County12.69110.910.750.78 1,087.960.270.5511.1154029Jefferson County28.49260.791.881.41 2,008.070.630.9019.233908151.67 47.25 488.363.513.16 4,553.58Totals:1.481.83page 1 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cToday's Date: 11/18/2011WEIRTONAPRIL 2005 (WEIRTON 04-05)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:14:26: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for April, 2005All FuelsTons/MonthCountyExhaustVOCExhaustNOxExhaustCOExhaustPM25ExhaustSO2ExhaustCO2CrankcaseVOCDiurnalVOCFIPSBrooke County10.42117.790.880.98 1,457.560.571.1616.7954009Hancock County12.62112.220.750.78 1,087.960.271.6510.9754029Jefferson County28.29264.521.881.41 2,008.070.632.7818.973908151.33 46.73 494.533.513.16 4,553.58Totals:1.485.59page 1 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cWEIRTONAPRIL 2005 (WEIRTON 04-05)Today's Date: 11/18/2011Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:14:26: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for April, 2005All FuelsTons/MonthCountyVaporDisplacementVOCTotalVOCSpillageVOCFIPSHot SoakVOCRunningLoss VOCTankPermeationVOCHosePermeationVOCBrooke County 0.1613.360.25540090.060.140.340.26Hancock County0.2016.180.31540290.080.180.500.37Jefferson County0.4336.190.96390810.331.280.720.770.79Totals:65.721.510.471.601.561.40page 2 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cToday's Date: 11/18/2011WEIRTONMAY 2005 (WEIRTON 05-05)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:25:05: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for May, 2005All FuelsTons/MonthCountyExhaustVOCExhaustNOxExhaustCOExhaustPM25ExhaustSO2ExhaustCO2CrankcaseVOCDiurnalVOCFIPSBrooke County10.38118.700.880.98 1,457.560.570.6216.7054009Hancock County12.57113.290.750.78 1,087.960.270.8910.8754029Jefferson County28.13267.541.881.41 2,008.070.631.4818.783908151.07 46.35 499.533.513.16 4,553.58Totals:1.482.99page 1 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cWEIRTONMAY 2005 (WEIRTON 05-05)Today's Date: 11/18/2011Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:25:05: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for May, 2005All FuelsTons/MonthCountyVaporDisplacementVOCTotalVOCSpillageVOCFIPSHot SoakVOCRunningLoss VOCTankPermeationVOCHosePermeationVOCBrooke County 0.1013.000.25540090.060.140.500.39Hancock County0.1215.700.31540290.080.180.740.55Jefferson County0.2635.290.96390810.331.281.071.150.48Totals:63.991.510.471.602.312.08page 2 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cToday's Date: 11/18/2011WEIRTONJUNE 2005 (WEIRTON 06-05)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:36:14: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for June, 2005All FuelsTons/MonthCountyExhaustVOCExhaustNOxExhaustCOExhaustPM25ExhaustSO2ExhaustCO2CrankcaseVOCDiurnalVOCFIPSBrooke County20.70168.341.191.18 1,798.350.580.8119.0954009Hancock County28.33185.631.141.00 1,546.210.281.1613.8454029Jefferson County61.68515.083.292.06 3,255.150.941.9327.4539081110.71 60.37 869.055.624.24 6,599.71Totals:1.803.91page 1 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cWEIRTONJUNE 2005 (WEIRTON 06-05)Today's Date: 11/18/2011Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:36:14: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for June, 2005All FuelsTons/MonthCountyVaporDisplacementVOCTotalVOCSpillageVOCFIPSHot SoakVOCRunningLoss VOCTankPermeationVOCHosePermeationVOCBrooke County 0.2124.100.33540090.100.190.670.52Hancock County0.2932.570.42540290.130.250.990.73Jefferson County0.6573.041.80390810.692.381.431.541.15Totals:129.712.540.922.823.092.78page 2 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cToday's Date: 11/18/2011WEIRTONJULY 2005 (WEIRTON 07-05)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:47:36: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for July, 2005All FuelsTons/MonthCountyExhaustVOCExhaustNOxExhaustCOExhaustPM25ExhaustSO2ExhaustCO2CrankcaseVOCDiurnalVOCFIPSBrooke County20.68168.821.191.18 1,798.350.580.9419.0454009Hancock County28.30186.241.141.00 1,546.210.281.3413.7854029Jefferson County61.57517.223.292.06 3,255.150.942.2327.3339081110.55 60.15 872.285.624.24 6,599.71Totals:1.804.50page 1 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cWEIRTONJULY 2005 (WEIRTON 07-05)Today's Date: 11/18/2011Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:47:36: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for July, 2005All FuelsTons/MonthCountyVaporDisplacementVOCTotalVOCSpillageVOCFIPSHot SoakVOCRunningLoss VOCTankPermeationVOCHosePermeationVOCBrooke County 0.2224.420.33540090.100.190.790.61Hancock County0.3033.040.42540290.130.251.160.86Jefferson County0.6973.801.80390810.692.381.681.811.22Totals:131.262.540.922.823.643.28page 2 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cToday's Date: 11/18/2011WEIRTONAUGUST 2005 (WEIRTON 08-05)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:58:51: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for August, 2005All FuelsTons/MonthCountyExhaustVOCExhaustNOxExhaustCOExhaustPM25ExhaustSO2ExhaustCO2CrankcaseVOCDiurnalVOCFIPSBrooke County20.68168.691.191.18 1,798.350.580.8919.0554009Hancock County28.31186.081.141.00 1,546.210.281.2813.7954029Jefferson County61.60516.653.292.06 3,255.150.942.1327.3639081110.59 60.21 871.425.624.24 6,599.71Totals:1.804.29page 1 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cWEIRTONAUGUST 2005 (WEIRTON 08-05)Today's Date: 11/18/2011Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:58:51: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for August, 2005All FuelsTons/MonthCountyVaporDisplacementVOCTotalVOCSpillageVOCFIPSHot SoakVOCRunningLoss VOCTankPermeationVOCHosePermeationVOCBrooke County 0.2224.340.33540090.100.190.760.59Hancock County0.3032.910.42540290.130.251.120.83Jefferson County0.6873.591.80390810.692.381.631.751.20Totals:130.842.540.922.823.513.17page 2 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cToday's Date: 11/18/2011WEIRTONSEPTEMBER 2005 (WEIRTON 09-05)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:10:09: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for September, 2005All FuelsTons/MonthCountyExhaustVOCExhaustNOxExhaustCOExhaustPM25ExhaustSO2ExhaustCO2CrankcaseVOCDiurnalVOCFIPSBrooke County10.38119.400.901.01 1,476.120.570.6816.8554009Hancock County12.58114.100.770.81 1,109.450.270.9711.0654029Jefferson County28.03268.881.871.39 1,996.250.631.6018.563908150.99 46.47 502.373.533.20 4,581.82Totals:1.483.25page 1 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cWEIRTONSEPTEMBER 2005 (WEIRTON 09-05)Today's Date: 11/18/2011Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:10:09: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for September, 2005All FuelsTons/MonthCountyVaporDisplacementVOCTotalVOCSpillageVOCFIPSHot SoakVOCRunningLoss VOCTankPermeationVOCHosePermeationVOCBrooke County 0.1013.210.25540090.060.140.580.45Hancock County0.1316.000.31540290.080.180.850.63Jefferson County0.2935.690.96390810.331.281.241.330.52Totals:64.891.510.471.602.672.41page 2 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cToday's Date: 11/18/2011WEIRTONOCTOBER 2005 (WEIRTON 10-05)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:20:58: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for October, 2005All FuelsTons/MonthCountyExhaustVOCExhaustNOxExhaustCOExhaustPM25ExhaustSO2ExhaustCO2CrankcaseVOCDiurnalVOCFIPSBrooke County10.44118.370.901.01 1,476.120.571.3716.9554009Hancock County12.64112.890.770.81 1,109.450.271.9511.1654029Jefferson County28.21265.491.871.39 1,996.250.633.2918.773908151.28 46.88 496.753.533.20 4,581.82Totals:1.486.60page 1 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cWEIRTONOCTOBER 2005 (WEIRTON 10-05)Today's Date: 11/18/2011Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:20:58: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for October, 2005All FuelsTons/MonthCountyVaporDisplacementVOCTotalVOCSpillageVOCFIPSHot SoakVOCRunningLoss VOCTankPermeationVOCHosePermeationVOCBrooke County 0.1713.700.25540090.060.140.400.31Hancock County0.2116.660.31540290.080.180.590.44Jefferson County0.4536.920.96390810.331.280.850.920.84Totals:67.281.510.471.601.841.66page 2 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cToday's Date: 11/18/2011WEIRTONNOVEMBER 2005 (WEIRTON 11-05)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:32:12: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for November, 2005All FuelsTons/MonthCountyExhaustVOCExhaustNOxExhaustCOExhaustPM25ExhaustSO2ExhaustCO2CrankcaseVOCDiurnalVOCFIPSBrooke County10.50117.200.901.01 1,476.120.570.4517.0854009Hancock County12.71111.530.770.81 1,109.450.270.6411.3054029Jefferson County28.42261.641.871.39 1,996.250.631.0519.033908151.62 47.41 490.383.533.20 4,581.82Totals:1.482.13page 1 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cWEIRTONNOVEMBER 2005 (WEIRTON 11-05)Today's Date: 11/18/2011Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:32:12: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for November, 2005All FuelsTons/MonthCountyVaporDisplacementVOCTotalVOCSpillageVOCFIPSHot SoakVOCRunningLoss VOCTankPermeationVOCHosePermeationVOCBrooke County 0.1412.530.25540090.060.140.240.19Hancock County0.1714.980.31540290.080.180.360.27Jefferson County0.3634.100.96390810.331.280.520.560.67Totals:61.621.510.471.601.121.01page 2 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cToday's Date: 11/18/2011WEIRTONDECEMBER 2005 (WEIRTON 12-05)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:42:59: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for December, 2005All FuelsTons/MonthCountyExhaustVOCExhaustNOxExhaustCOExhaustPM25ExhaustSO2ExhaustCO2CrankcaseVOCDiurnalVOCFIPSBrooke County5.0480.710.720.87 1,251.920.570.0315.4254009Hancock County4.4360.580.540.66 813.500.280.059.1954029Jefferson County13.55150.201.070.91 1,260.340.440.0812.923908123.02 37.53 291.482.322.44 3,325.77Totals:1.290.16page 1 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cWEIRTONDECEMBER 2005 (WEIRTON 12-05)Today's Date: 11/18/2011Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:42:59: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for December, 2005All FuelsTons/MonthCountyVaporDisplacementVOCTotalVOCSpillageVOCFIPSHot SoakVOCRunningLoss VOCTankPermeationVOCHosePermeationVOCBrooke County 0.056.270.16540090.030.090.170.13Hancock County0.055.570.20540290.030.100.250.19Jefferson County0.1516.350.67390810.140.590.360.390.25Totals:28.201.030.190.780.780.70page 2 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cToday's Date: 11/18/2011WEIRTONJANUARY 2008 (WEIRTON 01-08)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 13:46:34: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for January, 2008All FuelsTons/MonthCountyExhaustVOCExhaustNOxExhaustCOExhaustPM25ExhaustSO2ExhaustCO2CrankcaseVOCDiurnalVOCFIPSBrooke County3.9566.480.620.16 1,302.270.370.0012.3954009Hancock County3.6051.230.470.11 853.000.180.007.7054029Jefferson County12.32131.580.980.16 1,337.190.300.0011.183908119.87 31.27 249.292.070.43 3,492.46Totals:0.850.00page 1 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cWEIRTONJANUARY 2008 (WEIRTON 01-08)Today's Date: 11/18/2011Date of Model Run: Nov 03 13:46:34: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for January, 2008All FuelsTons/MonthCountyVaporDisplacementVOCTotalVOCSpillageVOCFIPSHot SoakVOCRunningLoss VOCTankPermeationVOCHosePermeationVOCBrooke County 0.044.930.16540090.030.090.160.13Hancock County0.054.590.20540290.030.110.230.19Jefferson County0.1414.990.68390810.160.670.350.380.23Totals:24.511.040.210.870.740.70page 2 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cToday's Date: 11/18/2011WEIRTONFEBRUARY 2008 (WEIRTON 02-08)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 13:57:14: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for February, 2008All FuelsTons/MonthCountyExhaustVOCExhaustNOxExhaustCOExhaustPM25ExhaustSO2ExhaustCO2CrankcaseVOCDiurnalVOCFIPSBrooke County3.9566.570.620.16 1,302.270.370.0512.3854009Hancock County3.6051.330.470.11 853.000.180.067.6954029Jefferson County12.30131.890.980.16 1,337.190.300.1111.153908119.85 31.22 249.782.070.43 3,492.46Totals:0.850.22page 1 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cWEIRTONFEBRUARY 2008 (WEIRTON 02-08)Today's Date: 11/18/2011Date of Model Run: Nov 03 13:57:14: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for February, 2008All FuelsTons/MonthCountyVaporDisplacementVOCTotalVOCSpillageVOCFIPSHot SoakVOCRunningLoss VOCTankPermeationVOCHosePermeationVOCBrooke County 0.054.970.16540090.030.090.160.13Hancock County0.054.640.20540290.030.110.230.19Jefferson County0.1515.070.68390810.160.670.340.370.24Totals:24.691.040.210.870.720.69page 2 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cToday's Date: 11/18/2011WEIRTONMARCH 2008 (WEIRTON 03-08)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:08:00: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for March, 2008All FuelsTons/MonthCountyExhaustVOCExhaustNOxExhaustCOExhaustPM25ExhaustSO2ExhaustCO2CrankcaseVOCDiurnalVOCFIPSBrooke County8.2396.600.750.18 1,514.990.360.4013.9554009Hancock County10.1593.640.640.14 1,135.800.170.579.7554029Jefferson County25.99228.581.740.25 2,139.070.420.9816.983908144.37 40.68 418.823.130.56 4,789.86Totals:0.961.95page 1 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cWEIRTONMARCH 2008 (WEIRTON 03-08)Today's Date: 11/18/2011Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:08:00: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for March, 2008All FuelsTons/MonthCountyVaporDisplacementVOCTotalVOCSpillageVOCFIPSHot SoakVOCRunningLoss VOCTankPermeationVOCHosePermeationVOCBrooke County 0.1310.000.24540090.060.150.230.20Hancock County0.1612.250.30540290.080.190.350.28Jefferson County0.3631.660.97390810.381.480.510.560.65Totals:53.921.510.531.821.091.04page 2 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cToday's Date: 11/18/2011WEIRTONAPRIL 2008 (WEIRTON 04-08)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:18:40: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for April, 2008All FuelsTons/MonthCountyExhaustVOCExhaustNOxExhaustCOExhaustPM25ExhaustSO2ExhaustCO2CrankcaseVOCDiurnalVOCFIPSBrooke County8.1897.500.750.18 1,514.990.361.1913.8354009Hancock County10.0994.740.640.14 1,135.800.171.719.6154029Jefferson County25.81231.821.740.25 2,139.070.423.0416.723908144.08 40.16 424.053.130.56 4,789.86Totals:0.965.94page 1 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cWEIRTONAPRIL 2008 (WEIRTON 04-08)Today's Date: 11/18/2011Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:18:40: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for April, 2008All FuelsTons/MonthCountyVaporDisplacementVOCTotalVOCSpillageVOCFIPSHot SoakVOCRunningLoss VOCTankPermeationVOCHosePermeationVOCBrooke County 0.1511.010.24540090.060.150.360.30Hancock County0.2013.700.30540290.080.190.530.43Jefferson County0.4534.190.97390810.381.480.780.850.80Totals:58.891.510.531.821.671.59page 2 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cToday's Date: 11/18/2011WEIRTONMAY 2008 (WEIRTON 05-08)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:29:23: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for May, 2008All FuelsTons/MonthCountyExhaustVOCExhaustNOxExhaustCOExhaustPM25ExhaustSO2ExhaustCO2CrankcaseVOCDiurnalVOCFIPSBrooke County8.1598.220.750.18 1,514.990.360.6413.7554009Hancock County10.0495.630.640.14 1,135.800.170.929.5154029Jefferson County25.67234.441.740.25 2,139.070.421.6216.523908143.86 39.78 428.293.130.56 4,789.86Totals:0.963.18page 1 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cWEIRTONMAY 2008 (WEIRTON 05-08)Today's Date: 11/18/2011Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:29:23: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for May, 2008All FuelsTons/MonthCountyVaporDisplacementVOCTotalVOCSpillageVOCFIPSHot SoakVOCRunningLoss VOCTankPermeationVOCHosePermeationVOCBrooke County 0.0910.680.24540090.060.150.530.45Hancock County0.1213.250.30540290.080.190.780.64Jefferson County0.2833.250.97390810.381.481.161.260.49Totals:57.171.510.531.822.472.35page 2 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cToday's Date: 11/18/2011WEIRTONJUNE 2008 (WEIRTON 06-08)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:40:44: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for June, 2008All FuelsTons/MonthCountyExhaustVOCExhaustNOxExhaustCOExhaustPM25ExhaustSO2ExhaustCO2CrankcaseVOCDiurnalVOCFIPSBrooke County16.62141.451.010.21 1,868.190.370.8416.2854009Hancock County22.99158.870.970.18 1,608.790.181.2012.7354029Jefferson County56.09454.683.050.37 3,469.040.632.1224.853908195.70 53.86 754.995.030.77 6,946.03Totals:1.174.15page 1 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cWEIRTONJUNE 2008 (WEIRTON 06-08)Today's Date: 11/18/2011Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:40:44: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for June, 2008All FuelsTons/MonthCountyVaporDisplacementVOCTotalVOCSpillageVOCFIPSHot SoakVOCRunningLoss VOCTankPermeationVOCHosePermeationVOCBrooke County 0.2019.960.33540090.100.200.710.60Hancock County0.2827.360.41540290.140.261.040.86Jefferson County0.6968.151.83390810.792.771.551.691.17Totals:115.482.571.033.233.313.15page 2 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cToday's Date: 11/18/2011WEIRTONJULY 2008 (WEIRTON 07-08)Date of Model Run: Nov 07 15:26:54: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for July, 2008All FuelsTons/MonthCountyExhaustVOCExhaustNOxExhaustCOExhaustPM25ExhaustSO2ExhaustCO2CrankcaseVOCDiurnalVOCFIPSBrooke County16.60141.841.010.21 1,868.190.370.9616.2354009Hancock County22.96159.380.970.18 1,608.790.181.3812.6754029Jefferson County55.99456.553.050.37 3,469.040.632.4424.733908195.55 53.63 757.775.030.77 6,946.03Totals:1.174.79page 1 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cWEIRTONJULY 2008 (WEIRTON 07-08)Today's Date: 11/18/2011Date of Model Run: Nov 07 15:26:54: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for July, 2008All FuelsTons/MonthCountyVaporDisplacementVOCTotalVOCSpillageVOCFIPSHot SoakVOCRunningLoss VOCTankPermeationVOCHosePermeationVOCBrooke County 0.2120.320.33540090.100.200.840.71Hancock County0.3027.870.41540290.140.261.231.01Jefferson County0.7369.001.83390810.792.771.831.991.24Totals:117.192.571.033.233.903.71page 2 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cToday's Date: 11/18/2011WEIRTONAUGUST 2008 (WEIRTON 08-08)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:03:22: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for August, 2008All FuelsTons/MonthCountyExhaustVOCExhaustNOxExhaustCOExhaustPM25ExhaustSO2ExhaustCO2CrankcaseVOCDiurnalVOCFIPSBrooke County16.61141.741.010.21 1,868.190.370.9216.2454009Hancock County22.97159.240.970.18 1,608.790.181.3212.6954029Jefferson County56.02456.053.050.37 3,469.040.632.3324.763908195.59 53.69 757.035.030.77 6,946.03Totals:1.174.56page 1 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cWEIRTONAUGUST 2008 (WEIRTON 08-08)Today's Date: 11/18/2011Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:03:22: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for August, 2008All FuelsTons/MonthCountyVaporDisplacementVOCTotalVOCSpillageVOCFIPSHot SoakVOCRunningLoss VOCTankPermeationVOCHosePermeationVOCBrooke County 0.2120.220.33540090.100.200.810.68Hancock County0.2927.740.41540290.140.261.190.98Jefferson County0.7268.771.83390810.792.771.771.921.22Totals:116.732.571.033.233.763.58page 2 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cToday's Date: 11/18/2011WEIRTONSEPTEMBER 2008 (WEIRTON 09-08)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:14:32: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for September, 2008All FuelsTons/MonthCountyExhaustVOCExhaustNOxExhaustCOExhaustPM25ExhaustSO2ExhaustCO2CrankcaseVOCDiurnalVOCFIPSBrooke County8.1598.790.770.18 1,534.910.360.7013.8954009Hancock County10.0596.300.660.14 1,158.870.171.009.6754029Jefferson County25.59235.601.730.25 2,126.380.421.7616.323908143.79 39.88 430.693.160.57 4,820.16Totals:0.963.45page 1 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cWEIRTONSEPTEMBER 2008 (WEIRTON 09-08)Today's Date: 11/18/2011Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:14:32: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for September, 2008All FuelsTons/MonthCountyVaporDisplacementVOCTotalVOCSpillageVOCFIPSHot SoakVOCRunningLoss VOCTankPermeationVOCHosePermeationVOCBrooke County 0.1010.900.24540090.060.150.610.52Hancock County0.1313.570.30540290.080.190.900.74Jefferson County0.3033.700.97390810.381.481.341.460.53Totals:58.161.510.531.822.862.72page 2 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cToday's Date: 11/18/2011WEIRTONOCTOBER 2008 (WEIRTON 10-08)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:25:22: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for October, 2008All FuelsTons/MonthCountyExhaustVOCExhaustNOxExhaustCOExhaustPM25ExhaustSO2ExhaustCO2CrankcaseVOCDiurnalVOCFIPSBrooke County8.1997.970.770.18 1,534.910.361.4113.9854009Hancock County10.1095.300.660.14 1,158.870.172.029.7854029Jefferson County25.74232.661.730.25 2,126.380.423.6016.533908144.04 40.29 425.933.160.57 4,820.16Totals:0.967.02page 1 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cWEIRTONOCTOBER 2008 (WEIRTON 10-08)Today's Date: 11/18/2011Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:25:22: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for October, 2008All FuelsTons/MonthCountyVaporDisplacementVOCTotalVOCSpillageVOCFIPSHot SoakVOCRunningLoss VOCTankPermeationVOCHosePermeationVOCBrooke County 0.1611.360.24540090.060.150.420.36Hancock County0.2114.210.30540290.080.190.620.51Jefferson County0.4835.010.97390810.381.480.921.000.85Totals:60.571.510.531.821.971.88page 2 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cToday's Date: 11/18/2011WEIRTONNOVEMBER 2008 (WEIRTON 11-08)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:36:34: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for November, 2008All FuelsTons/MonthCountyExhaustVOCExhaustNOxExhaustCOExhaustPM25ExhaustSO2ExhaustCO2CrankcaseVOCDiurnalVOCFIPSBrooke County8.2497.040.770.18 1,534.910.360.4614.1054009Hancock County10.1694.170.660.14 1,158.870.170.669.9254029Jefferson County25.93229.331.730.25 2,126.380.421.1416.793908144.33 40.81 420.543.160.57 4,820.16Totals:0.962.27page 1 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cWEIRTONNOVEMBER 2008 (WEIRTON 11-08)Today's Date: 11/18/2011Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:36:34: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for November, 2008All FuelsTons/MonthCountyVaporDisplacementVOCTotalVOCSpillageVOCFIPSHot SoakVOCRunningLoss VOCTankPermeationVOCHosePermeationVOCBrooke County 0.1310.130.24540090.060.150.260.22Hancock County0.1712.430.30540290.080.190.380.31Jefferson County0.3831.880.97390810.381.480.560.610.69Totals:54.441.510.531.821.201.14page 2 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cToday's Date: 11/18/2011WEIRTONDECEMBER 2008 (WEIRTON 12-08)Date of Model Run: Nov 07 15:29:03: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for December, 2008All FuelsTons/MonthCountyExhaustVOCExhaustNOxExhaustCOExhaustPM25ExhaustSO2ExhaustCO2CrankcaseVOCDiurnalVOCFIPSBrooke County3.9466.610.620.16 1,302.270.370.0312.3754009Hancock County3.6051.380.470.11 853.000.180.057.6854029Jefferson County12.29132.050.980.16 1,337.190.300.0911.143908119.83 31.19 250.042.070.43 3,492.46Totals:0.850.17page 1 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cWEIRTONDECEMBER 2008 (WEIRTON 12-08)Today's Date: 11/18/2011Date of Model Run: Nov 07 15:29:03: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for December, 2008All FuelsTons/MonthCountyVaporDisplacementVOCTotalVOCSpillageVOCFIPSHot SoakVOCRunningLoss VOCTankPermeationVOCHosePermeationVOCBrooke County 0.055.000.16540090.030.090.180.15Hancock County0.054.690.20540290.030.110.260.22Jefferson County0.1515.150.68390810.160.670.390.430.25Totals:24.851.040.210.870.830.79page 2 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cToday's Date: 11/18/2011WEIRTONJANUARY 2015 (WEIRTON 01-15)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 13:48:41: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for January, 2015All FuelsTons/MonthCountyExhaustVOCExhaustNOxExhaustCOExhaustPM25ExhaustSO2ExhaustCO2CrankcaseVOCDiurnalVOCFIPSBrooke County2.2235.240.430.02 1,453.330.050.005.7554009Hancock County2.3734.750.330.01 962.470.030.004.0754029Jefferson County9.56108.390.780.02 1,534.970.080.006.563908114.16 16.38 178.381.540.05 3,950.76Totals:0.160.00page 1 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cWEIRTONJANUARY 2015 (WEIRTON 01-15)Today's Date: 11/18/2011Date of Model Run: Nov 03 13:48:41: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for January, 2015All FuelsTons/MonthCountyVaporDisplacementVOCTotalVOCSpillageVOCFIPSHot SoakVOCRunningLoss VOCTankPermeationVOCHosePermeationVOCBrooke County 0.042.730.18540090.030.030.110.07Hancock County0.053.020.22540290.030.040.170.10Jefferson County0.1611.630.76390810.190.540.200.150.25Totals:17.391.160.250.620.480.32page 2 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cToday's Date: 11/18/2011WEIRTONFEBRUARY 2015 (WEIRTON 02-15)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 13:59:22: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for February, 2015All FuelsTons/MonthCountyExhaustVOCExhaustNOxExhaustCOExhaustPM25ExhaustSO2ExhaustCO2CrankcaseVOCDiurnalVOCFIPSBrooke County2.2235.310.430.02 1,453.330.050.045.7454009Hancock County2.3734.830.330.01 962.470.030.064.0654029Jefferson County9.55108.670.780.02 1,534.970.080.116.543908114.14 16.35 178.801.540.05 3,950.76Totals:0.160.20page 1 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cWEIRTONFEBRUARY 2015 (WEIRTON 02-15)Today's Date: 11/18/2011Date of Model Run: Nov 03 13:59:22: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for February, 2015All FuelsTons/MonthCountyVaporDisplacementVOCTotalVOCSpillageVOCFIPSHot SoakVOCRunningLoss VOCTankPermeationVOCHosePermeationVOCBrooke County 0.042.770.18540090.030.030.110.07Hancock County0.053.070.22540290.030.040.160.10Jefferson County0.1711.730.76390810.190.540.200.140.26Totals:17.571.160.250.620.470.31page 2 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cToday's Date: 11/18/2011WEIRTONMARCH 2015 (WEIRTON 03-15)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:10:08: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for March, 2015All FuelsTons/MonthCountyExhaustVOCExhaustNOxExhaustCOExhaustPM25ExhaustSO2ExhaustCO2CrankcaseVOCDiurnalVOCFIPSBrooke County4.0857.270.520.02 1,687.480.040.347.1554009Hancock County5.2766.070.440.02 1,271.300.020.495.9854029Jefferson County17.87185.791.320.03 2,464.540.080.9710.563908127.22 23.69 309.122.280.07 5,423.31Totals:0.141.80page 1 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cWEIRTONMARCH 2015 (WEIRTON 03-15)Today's Date: 11/18/2011Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:10:08: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for March, 2015All FuelsTons/MonthCountyVaporDisplacementVOCTotalVOCSpillageVOCFIPSHot SoakVOCRunningLoss VOCTankPermeationVOCHosePermeationVOCBrooke County 0.125.240.26540090.070.060.170.10Hancock County0.166.850.33540290.090.080.250.15Jefferson County0.4022.731.09390810.471.350.300.220.68Totals:34.821.680.621.490.710.47page 2 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cToday's Date: 11/18/2011WEIRTONAPRIL 2015 (WEIRTON 04-15)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:20:47: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for April, 2015All FuelsTons/MonthCountyExhaustVOCExhaustNOxExhaustCOExhaustPM25ExhaustSO2ExhaustCO2CrankcaseVOCDiurnalVOCFIPSBrooke County4.0557.930.520.02 1,687.480.041.037.0854009Hancock County5.2466.910.440.02 1,271.300.021.485.8754029Jefferson County17.75188.541.320.03 2,464.540.083.0110.383908127.05 23.33 313.382.280.07 5,423.31Totals:0.145.52page 1 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cWEIRTONAPRIL 2015 (WEIRTON 04-15)Today's Date: 11/18/2011Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:20:47: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for April, 2015All FuelsTons/MonthCountyVaporDisplacementVOCTotalVOCSpillageVOCFIPSHot SoakVOCRunningLoss VOCTankPermeationVOCHosePermeationVOCBrooke County 0.156.070.26540090.070.060.250.15Hancock County0.208.050.33540290.090.080.380.23Jefferson County0.5025.031.09390810.471.350.460.330.85Totals:39.151.680.621.491.090.72page 2 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cToday's Date: 11/18/2011WEIRTONMAY 2015 (WEIRTON 05-15)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:31:38: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for May, 2015All FuelsTons/MonthCountyExhaustVOCExhaustNOxExhaustCOExhaustPM25ExhaustSO2ExhaustCO2CrankcaseVOCDiurnalVOCFIPSBrooke County4.0358.470.520.02 1,687.480.040.557.0254009Hancock County5.2167.600.440.02 1,271.300.020.805.8054029Jefferson County17.66190.771.320.03 2,464.540.081.6010.243908126.91 23.06 316.842.280.07 5,423.31Totals:0.142.95page 1 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cWEIRTONMAY 2015 (WEIRTON 05-15)Today's Date: 11/18/2011Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:31:38: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for May, 2015All FuelsTons/MonthCountyVaporDisplacementVOCTotalVOCSpillageVOCFIPSHot SoakVOCRunningLoss VOCTankPermeationVOCHosePermeationVOCBrooke County 0.095.710.26540090.070.060.370.23Hancock County0.127.560.33540290.090.080.560.35Jefferson County0.3123.721.09390810.471.350.680.490.52Totals:36.991.680.621.491.611.07page 2 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cToday's Date: 11/18/2011WEIRTONJUNE 2015 (WEIRTON 06-15)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:43:00: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for June, 2015All FuelsTons/MonthCountyExhaustVOCExhaustNOxExhaustCOExhaustPM25ExhaustSO2ExhaustCO2CrankcaseVOCDiurnalVOCFIPSBrooke County8.3792.670.680.03 2,073.940.040.729.4154009Hancock County11.80117.800.630.03 1,784.670.021.048.9554029Jefferson County37.32377.422.300.05 3,992.380.122.0916.683908157.49 35.04 587.903.610.11 7,850.99Totals:0.193.85page 1 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cWEIRTONJUNE 2015 (WEIRTON 06-15)Today's Date: 11/18/2011Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:43:00: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for June, 2015All FuelsTons/MonthCountyVaporDisplacementVOCTotalVOCSpillageVOCFIPSHot SoakVOCRunningLoss VOCTankPermeationVOCHosePermeationVOCBrooke County 0.2010.690.36540090.110.080.500.31Hancock County0.2815.070.45540290.150.110.750.47Jefferson County0.7647.492.05390810.952.620.910.661.24Totals:73.252.861.212.812.161.43page 2 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cToday's Date: 11/18/2011WEIRTONJULY 2015 (WEIRTON 07-15)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:54:17: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for July, 2015All FuelsTons/MonthCountyExhaustVOCExhaustNOxExhaustCOExhaustPM25ExhaustSO2ExhaustCO2CrankcaseVOCDiurnalVOCFIPSBrooke County8.3692.970.680.03 2,073.940.040.839.3754009Hancock County11.79118.200.630.03 1,784.670.021.208.9054029Jefferson County37.26379.012.300.05 3,992.380.122.4116.593908157.41 34.87 590.183.610.11 7,850.99Totals:0.194.44page 1 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cWEIRTONJULY 2015 (WEIRTON 07-15)Today's Date: 11/18/2011Date of Model Run: Nov 03 14:54:17: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for July, 2015All FuelsTons/MonthCountyVaporDisplacementVOCTotalVOCSpillageVOCFIPSHot SoakVOCRunningLoss VOCTankPermeationVOCHosePermeationVOCBrooke County 0.2110.940.36540090.110.080.590.36Hancock County0.3015.450.45540290.150.110.890.55Jefferson County0.8148.072.05390810.952.621.070.771.32Totals:74.462.861.212.812.541.68page 2 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cToday's Date: 11/18/2011WEIRTONAUGUST 2015 (WEIRTON 08-15)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:05:36: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for August, 2015All FuelsTons/MonthCountyExhaustVOCExhaustNOxExhaustCOExhaustPM25ExhaustSO2ExhaustCO2CrankcaseVOCDiurnalVOCFIPSBrooke County8.3692.890.680.03 2,073.940.040.799.3854009Hancock County11.79118.090.630.03 1,784.670.021.148.9254029Jefferson County37.28378.592.300.05 3,992.380.122.3016.613908157.43 34.91 589.573.610.11 7,850.99Totals:0.194.24page 1 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cWEIRTONAUGUST 2015 (WEIRTON 08-15)Today's Date: 11/18/2011Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:05:36: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for August, 2015All FuelsTons/MonthCountyVaporDisplacementVOCTotalVOCSpillageVOCFIPSHot SoakVOCRunningLoss VOCTankPermeationVOCHosePermeationVOCBrooke County 0.2110.870.36540090.110.080.570.35Hancock County0.2915.340.45540290.150.110.860.53Jefferson County0.7947.902.05390810.952.621.030.751.30Totals:74.112.861.212.812.461.62page 2 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cToday's Date: 11/18/2011WEIRTONSEPTEMBER 2015 (WEIRTON 09-15)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:16:40: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for September, 2015All FuelsTons/MonthCountyExhaustVOCExhaustNOxExhaustCOExhaustPM25ExhaustSO2ExhaustCO2CrankcaseVOCDiurnalVOCFIPSBrooke County4.0458.890.530.02 1,710.610.040.607.1154009Hancock County5.2268.120.450.02 1,298.090.020.875.9054029Jefferson County17.61191.781.320.03 2,449.810.081.7410.113908126.87 23.12 318.782.300.07 5,458.51Totals:0.143.20page 1 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cWEIRTONSEPTEMBER 2015 (WEIRTON 09-15)Today's Date: 11/18/2011Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:16:40: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for September, 2015All FuelsTons/MonthCountyVaporDisplacementVOCTotalVOCSpillageVOCFIPSHot SoakVOCRunningLoss VOCTankPermeationVOCHosePermeationVOCBrooke County 0.105.870.26540090.070.060.430.26Hancock County0.137.790.33540290.090.080.650.40Jefferson County0.3424.011.09390810.461.350.780.570.57Totals:37.671.680.621.491.871.23page 2 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cToday's Date: 11/18/2011WEIRTONOCTOBER 2015 (WEIRTON 10-15)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:27:38: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for October, 2015All FuelsTons/MonthCountyExhaustVOCExhaustNOxExhaustCOExhaustPM25ExhaustSO2ExhaustCO2CrankcaseVOCDiurnalVOCFIPSBrooke County4.0658.280.530.02 1,710.610.041.217.1754009Hancock County5.2567.340.450.02 1,298.090.021.755.9854029Jefferson County17.71189.271.320.03 2,449.810.083.5610.253908127.02 23.41 314.892.300.07 5,458.51Totals:0.146.52page 1 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cWEIRTONOCTOBER 2015 (WEIRTON 10-15)Today's Date: 11/18/2011Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:27:38: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for October, 2015All FuelsTons/MonthCountyVaporDisplacementVOCTotalVOCSpillageVOCFIPSHot SoakVOCRunningLoss VOCTankPermeationVOCHosePermeationVOCBrooke County 0.166.350.26540090.070.060.300.18Hancock County0.218.450.33540290.090.080.450.28Jefferson County0.5325.711.09390810.461.350.540.390.90Totals:40.511.680.621.491.290.85page 2 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cToday's Date: 11/18/2011WEIRTONNOVEMBER 2015 (WEIRTON 11-15)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:38:41: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for November, 2015All FuelsTons/MonthCountyExhaustVOCExhaustNOxExhaustCOExhaustPM25ExhaustSO2ExhaustCO2CrankcaseVOCDiurnalVOCFIPSBrooke County4.0957.590.530.02 1,710.610.040.407.2554009Hancock County5.2866.470.450.02 1,298.090.020.576.0854029Jefferson County17.83186.431.320.03 2,449.810.081.1310.433908127.20 23.77 310.492.300.07 5,458.51Totals:0.142.10page 1 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cWEIRTONNOVEMBER 2015 (WEIRTON 11-15)Today's Date: 11/18/2011Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:38:41: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for November, 2015All FuelsTons/MonthCountyVaporDisplacementVOCTotalVOCSpillageVOCFIPSHot SoakVOCRunningLoss VOCTankPermeationVOCHosePermeationVOCBrooke County 0.135.340.26540090.070.060.180.11Hancock County0.176.990.33540290.090.080.270.17Jefferson County0.4222.921.09390810.461.350.330.240.73Totals:35.251.680.621.490.780.52page 2 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cToday's Date: 11/18/2011WEIRTONDECEMBER 2015 (WEIRTON 12-15)Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:49:31: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for December, 2015All FuelsTons/MonthCountyExhaustVOCExhaustNOxExhaustCOExhaustPM25ExhaustSO2ExhaustCO2CrankcaseVOCDiurnalVOCFIPSBrooke County2.2235.340.430.02 1,453.330.050.035.7454009Hancock County2.3734.870.330.01 962.470.030.044.0654029Jefferson County9.54108.820.780.02 1,534.970.080.086.533908114.13 16.33 179.021.540.05 3,950.76Totals:0.160.16page 1 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cWEIRTONDECEMBER 2015 (WEIRTON 12-15)Today's Date: 11/18/2011Date of Model Run: Nov 03 15:49:31: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for December, 2015All FuelsTons/MonthCountyVaporDisplacementVOCTotalVOCSpillageVOCFIPSHot SoakVOCRunningLoss VOCTankPermeationVOCHosePermeationVOCBrooke County 0.042.780.18540090.030.030.130.08Hancock County0.053.100.22540290.030.040.190.12Jefferson County0.1711.760.76390810.190.540.230.170.26Totals:17.641.160.250.620.550.36page 2 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cToday's Date: 2/22/2012WEIRTONJANUARY 2025 (WEIRTON 01-25)Date of Model Run: Nov 28 14:16:27: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for January, 2025All FuelsTons/MonthCountyExhaustVOCExhaustNOxExhaustCOExhaustPM25ExhaustSO2ExhaustCO2CrankcaseVOCDiurnalVOCFIPSBrooke County1.9932.230.260.02 1,724.310.010.003.6854009Hancock County2.2035.230.190.01 1,143.550.020.002.5454029Jefferson County8.32117.500.550.02 1,825.770.040.004.573908112.50 10.78 184.961.000.05 4,693.64Totals:0.070.00page 1 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cWEIRTONJANUARY 2025 (WEIRTON 01-25)Today's Date: 2/22/2012Date of Model Run: Nov 28 14:16:27: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for January, 2025All FuelsTons/MonthCountyVaporDisplacementVOCTotalVOCSpillageVOCFIPSHot SoakVOCRunningLoss VOCTankPermeationVOCHosePermeationVOCBrooke County 0.042.400.21540090.030.030.050.04Hancock County0.052.730.26540290.040.040.080.06Jefferson County0.1810.310.89390810.200.550.080.050.27Totals:15.441.350.270.620.200.14page 2 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cToday's Date: 2/22/2012WEIRTONFEBRUARY 2025 (WEIRTON 02-25)Date of Model Run: Nov 28 14:18:39: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for February, 2025All FuelsTons/MonthCountyExhaustVOCExhaustNOxExhaustCOExhaustPM25ExhaustSO2ExhaustCO2CrankcaseVOCDiurnalVOCFIPSBrooke County1.9932.300.260.02 1,724.310.010.033.6754009Hancock County2.2035.320.190.01 1,143.550.020.052.5354029Jefferson County8.30117.820.550.02 1,825.770.040.114.553908112.49 10.75 185.431.000.05 4,693.64Totals:0.070.19page 1 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cWEIRTONFEBRUARY 2025 (WEIRTON 02-25)Today's Date: 2/22/2012Date of Model Run: Nov 28 14:18:39: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for February, 2025All FuelsTons/MonthCountyVaporDisplacementVOCTotalVOCSpillageVOCFIPSHot SoakVOCRunningLoss VOCTankPermeationVOCHosePermeationVOCBrooke County 0.042.430.21540090.030.030.050.04Hancock County0.052.770.26540290.040.040.070.05Jefferson County0.1910.410.89390810.200.550.080.050.28Totals:15.611.350.270.620.200.14page 2 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cWEIRTONMARCH 2025 (WEIRTON 03-25)Today's Date: 2/22/2012Date of Model Run: Nov 28 14:20:55: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for March, 2025All FuelsTons/MonthCountyVaporDisplacementVOCTotalVOCSpillageVOCFIPSHot SoakVOCRunningLoss VOCTankPermeationVOCHosePermeationVOCBrooke County 0.133.470.31540090.070.040.080.05Hancock County0.184.370.39540290.100.050.110.08Jefferson County0.4416.921.25390810.511.370.110.080.74Totals:24.761.950.681.470.300.21page 2 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cToday's Date: 2/22/2012WEIRTONMARCH 2025 (WEIRTON 03-25)Date of Model Run: Nov 28 14:20:55: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for March, 2025All FuelsTons/MonthCountyExhaustVOCExhaustNOxExhaustCOExhaustPM25ExhaustSO2ExhaustCO2CrankcaseVOCDiurnalVOCFIPSBrooke County2.5053.670.300.02 1,991.170.000.284.7554009Hancock County3.0565.500.250.02 1,492.740.000.404.0854029Jefferson County12.18195.920.860.03 2,907.120.010.977.253908117.74 16.08 315.101.410.08 6,391.03Totals:0.021.65page 1 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cToday's Date: 2/22/2012WEIRTONAPRIL 2025 (WEIRTON 04-25)Date of Model Run: Nov 28 14:23:10: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for April, 2025All FuelsTons/MonthCountyExhaustVOCExhaustNOxExhaustCOExhaustPM25ExhaustSO2ExhaustCO2CrankcaseVOCDiurnalVOCFIPSBrooke County2.4854.360.300.02 1,991.170.000.854.7054009Hancock County3.0366.390.250.02 1,492.740.001.214.0054029Jefferson County12.07198.930.860.03 2,907.120.013.017.093908117.58 15.79 319.691.410.08 6,391.03Totals:0.025.07page 1 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cWEIRTONAPRIL 2025 (WEIRTON 04-25)Today's Date: 2/22/2012Date of Model Run: Nov 28 14:23:10: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for April, 2025All FuelsTons/MonthCountyVaporDisplacementVOCTotalVOCSpillageVOCFIPSHot SoakVOCRunningLoss VOCTankPermeationVOCHosePermeationVOCBrooke County 0.164.120.31540090.070.040.110.08Hancock County0.215.290.39540290.100.050.170.13Jefferson County0.5519.071.25390810.511.370.170.120.92Totals:28.471.950.681.470.460.33page 2 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cToday's Date: 2/22/2012WEIRTONMAY 2025 (WEIRTON 05-25)Date of Model Run: Nov 28 14:25:27: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for May, 2025All FuelsTons/MonthCountyExhaustVOCExhaustNOxExhaustCOExhaustPM25ExhaustSO2ExhaustCO2CrankcaseVOCDiurnalVOCFIPSBrooke County2.4754.920.300.02 1,991.170.000.464.6654009Hancock County3.0067.110.250.02 1,492.740.000.653.9554029Jefferson County11.99201.370.860.03 2,907.120.011.606.963908117.46 15.58 323.401.410.08 6,391.03Totals:0.022.71page 1 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cWEIRTONMAY 2025 (WEIRTON 05-25)Today's Date: 2/22/2012Date of Model Run: Nov 28 14:25:27: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for May, 2025All FuelsTons/MonthCountyVaporDisplacementVOCTotalVOCSpillageVOCFIPSHot SoakVOCRunningLoss VOCTankPermeationVOCHosePermeationVOCBrooke County 0.093.740.31540090.070.040.170.12Hancock County0.134.770.39540290.100.050.260.19Jefferson County0.3417.501.25390810.511.370.260.170.57Totals:26.011.950.681.470.690.49page 2 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cToday's Date: 2/22/2012WEIRTONJUNE 2025 (WEIRTON 06-25)Date of Model Run: Nov 28 14:27:42: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for June, 2025All FuelsTons/MonthCountyExhaustVOCExhaustNOxExhaustCOExhaustPM25ExhaustSO2ExhaustCO2CrankcaseVOCDiurnalVOCFIPSBrooke County4.4287.540.390.03 2,428.500.000.606.6154009Hancock County5.90114.670.340.03 2,069.020.000.856.5954029Jefferson County23.82397.001.490.06 4,670.230.012.0911.753908134.14 24.95 599.212.230.12 9,167.74Totals:0.023.54page 1 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cWEIRTONJUNE 2025 (WEIRTON 06-25)Today's Date: 2/22/2012Date of Model Run: Nov 28 14:27:42: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for June, 2025All FuelsTons/MonthCountyVaporDisplacementVOCTotalVOCSpillageVOCFIPSHot SoakVOCRunningLoss VOCTankPermeationVOCHosePermeationVOCBrooke County 0.216.210.42540090.120.050.230.16Hancock County0.308.420.53540290.170.070.340.25Jefferson County0.8333.392.35390811.042.660.350.231.34Totals:48.023.291.332.780.920.65page 2 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cToday's Date: 2/22/2012WEIRTONJULY 2025 (WEIRTON 07-25)Date of Model Run: Nov 28 14:30:01: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for July, 2025All FuelsTons/MonthCountyExhaustVOCExhaustNOxExhaustCOExhaustPM25ExhaustSO2ExhaustCO2CrankcaseVOCDiurnalVOCFIPSBrooke County4.4187.840.390.03 2,428.500.000.696.5954009Hancock County5.89115.070.340.03 2,069.020.000.986.5554029Jefferson County23.76398.721.490.06 4,670.230.012.4111.673908134.06 24.81 601.632.230.12 9,167.74Totals:0.024.08page 1 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cWEIRTONJULY 2025 (WEIRTON 07-25)Today's Date: 2/22/2012Date of Model Run: Nov 28 14:30:01: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for July, 2025All FuelsTons/MonthCountyVaporDisplacementVOCTotalVOCSpillageVOCFIPSHot SoakVOCRunningLoss VOCTankPermeationVOCHosePermeationVOCBrooke County 0.226.380.42540090.120.050.270.19Hancock County0.328.660.53540290.170.070.400.30Jefferson County0.8933.812.35390811.042.660.410.281.42Totals:48.843.291.332.781.080.76page 2 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cToday's Date: 2/22/2012WEIRTONAUGUST 2025 (WEIRTON 08-25)Date of Model Run: Nov 28 14:32:18: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for August, 2025All FuelsTons/MonthCountyExhaustVOCExhaustNOxExhaustCOExhaustPM25ExhaustSO2ExhaustCO2CrankcaseVOCDiurnalVOCFIPSBrooke County4.4187.760.390.03 2,428.500.000.666.6054009Hancock County5.89114.960.340.03 2,069.020.000.936.5654029Jefferson County23.78398.271.490.06 4,670.230.012.3011.693908134.08 24.85 600.992.230.12 9,167.74Totals:0.023.89page 1 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cWEIRTONAUGUST 2025 (WEIRTON 08-25)Today's Date: 2/22/2012Date of Model Run: Nov 28 14:32:18: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for August, 2025All FuelsTons/MonthCountyVaporDisplacementVOCTotalVOCSpillageVOCFIPSHot SoakVOCRunningLoss VOCTankPermeationVOCHosePermeationVOCBrooke County 0.226.330.42540090.120.050.260.19Hancock County0.318.590.53540290.170.070.390.29Jefferson County0.8733.672.35390811.042.660.390.271.40Totals:48.593.291.332.781.040.74page 2 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cWEIRTONSEPTEMBER 2025 (WEIRTON 09-25)Today's Date: 2/22/2012Date of Model Run: Nov 28 14:34:34: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for September, 2025All FuelsTons/MonthCountyVaporDisplacementVOCTotalVOCSpillageVOCFIPSHot SoakVOCRunningLoss VOCTankPermeationVOCHosePermeationVOCBrooke County 0.103.840.31540090.070.040.200.14Hancock County0.144.910.39540290.100.050.300.22Jefferson County0.3717.691.25390810.511.370.300.200.62Totals:26.441.950.681.470.790.56page 2 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cToday's Date: 2/22/2012WEIRTONSEPTEMBER 2025 (WEIRTON 09-25)Date of Model Run: Nov 28 14:34:34: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for September, 2025All FuelsTons/MonthCountyExhaustVOCExhaustNOxExhaustCOExhaustPM25ExhaustSO2ExhaustCO2CrankcaseVOCDiurnalVOCFIPSBrooke County2.4755.310.310.02 2,018.870.000.504.7054009Hancock County3.0167.600.250.02 1,524.810.000.713.9954029Jefferson County11.94202.510.850.03 2,889.480.011.736.873908117.42 15.56 325.411.410.08 6,433.16Totals:0.022.93page 1 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cToday's Date: 2/22/2012WEIRTONOCTOBER 2025 (WEIRTON 10-25)Date of Model Run: Nov 28 14:36:49: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for October, 2025All FuelsTons/MonthCountyExhaustVOCExhaustNOxExhaustCOExhaustPM25ExhaustSO2ExhaustCO2CrankcaseVOCDiurnalVOCFIPSBrooke County2.4954.680.310.02 2,018.870.001.014.7454009Hancock County3.0366.780.250.02 1,524.810.001.434.0554029Jefferson County12.03199.770.850.03 2,889.480.013.567.003908117.56 15.79 321.231.410.08 6,433.16Totals:0.026.00page 1 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cWEIRTONOCTOBER 2025 (WEIRTON 10-25)Today's Date: 2/22/2012Date of Model Run: Nov 28 14:36:49: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for October, 2025All FuelsTons/MonthCountyVaporDisplacementVOCTotalVOCSpillageVOCFIPSHot SoakVOCRunningLoss VOCTankPermeationVOCHosePermeationVOCBrooke County 0.174.320.31540090.070.040.140.10Hancock County0.235.590.39540290.100.050.200.15Jefferson County0.5919.671.25390810.511.370.210.140.98Totals:29.581.950.681.470.550.39page 2 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cToday's Date: 2/22/2012WEIRTONNOVEMBER 2025 (WEIRTON 11-25)Date of Model Run: Nov 28 14:39:01: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for November, 2025All FuelsTons/MonthCountyExhaustVOCExhaustNOxExhaustCOExhaustPM25ExhaustSO2ExhaustCO2CrankcaseVOCDiurnalVOCFIPSBrooke County2.5153.970.310.02 2,018.870.000.334.7954009Hancock County3.0665.870.250.02 1,524.810.000.474.1254029Jefferson County12.14196.660.850.03 2,889.480.011.137.173908117.72 16.09 316.501.410.08 6,433.16Totals:0.021.92page 1 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cWEIRTONNOVEMBER 2025 (WEIRTON 11-25)Today's Date: 2/22/2012Date of Model Run: Nov 28 14:39:01: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for November, 2025All FuelsTons/MonthCountyVaporDisplacementVOCTotalVOCSpillageVOCFIPSHot SoakVOCRunningLoss VOCTankPermeationVOCHosePermeationVOCBrooke County 0.133.540.31540090.070.040.080.06Hancock County0.194.470.39540290.100.050.120.09Jefferson County0.4717.091.25390810.511.370.130.080.79Totals:25.101.950.681.470.330.23page 2 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cToday's Date: 2/22/2012WEIRTONDECEMBER 2025 (WEIRTON 12-25)Date of Model Run: Nov 28 14:41:10: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for December, 2025All FuelsTons/MonthCountyExhaustVOCExhaustNOxExhaustCOExhaustPM25ExhaustSO2ExhaustCO2CrankcaseVOCDiurnalVOCFIPSBrooke County1.9932.340.260.02 1,724.310.010.023.6754009Hancock County2.1935.360.190.01 1,143.550.020.042.5354029Jefferson County8.30117.980.550.02 1,825.770.040.084.543908112.48 10.74 185.681.000.05 4,693.64Totals:0.070.14page 1 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005cWEIRTONDECEMBER 2025 (WEIRTON 12-25)Today's Date: 2/22/2012Date of Model Run: Nov 28 14:41:10: 2011Emission Totals by County and PollutantTotal for December, 2025All FuelsTons/MonthCountyVaporDisplacementVOCTotalVOCSpillageVOCFIPSHot SoakVOCRunningLoss VOCTankPermeationVOCHosePermeationVOCBrooke County 0.042.430.21540090.030.030.060.04Hancock County0.052.780.26540290.040.040.090.06Jefferson County0.1910.410.89390810.200.550.090.060.29Totals:15.621.350.270.620.230.16page 2 of 2Core Model ver 2008a, 07/06/09. NONROAD ReportingUtility, Version 2005c

# Appendix E

## This page left intentionally blank

## Public Notice

Ohio Environmental Protection Agency

Redesignation and Maintenance Plan for the Ohio Portion of the

Steubenville-Weirton, WV-OH

24- Hour PM 2.5 

## Nonattainment Area

Jefferson County, Ohio

Notice is hereby given that the Director of the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency

(Ohio EPA) is requesting that the United States Environm ental Protection Agency (U.S.

EPA) revise the current air quality designation for the Ohio portion (Jefferson County) of

the Steubenville-Weirton, WV-O H area, to attainment with respect to the 2006 24-Hour

PM 2.5 

## national ambient air qualit y standard (NAAQS). This redesignation should not be

confused with Ohio EPA’s rece nt request to U.S. EPA fo r redesignation of the 1997

Annual PM2.5 standards for which a separate hearing was held recently. Air quality

monitoring data collected bet ween 2008 and 2010 in the regi on demonstrate attainment

of the NAAQS and there is ev idence that the improved ai r quality is due to permanent,

enforceable emission reductions. In addition, existing requirements are sufficient to

maintain the 2006 24-Hour PM 2.5 

## standard in this area at leas t ten years into the future.

Computer models show that existing state and federal emi ssion reduction requirements

are sufficient to attain and maintain t he NAAQS in the Steubenv ille-Weirton area.

Therefore, Ohio EPA proposes to utilize existing emissi on inventory information and

projections of future emissions as the dem onstration of the ability to maintain the

NAAQS in the Steubenville-We irton area in the future.

The Steubenville-Weirton area is currently designated as nonattainment for the 2006

24-Hour PM 2.5 

## standard. As part of an acceptabl e maintenance plan, Ohio EPA has

developed, as required, a cont ingency plan to provide for addi tional emission reductions

if a violation of the NAAQS is monito red after the area has been redesignated.

The State of Ohio proposes to:

1. Request the U.S. EPA redes ignate the Ohio portion of the Steubenville-Weirton,

WV-OH area to attainment with respect to the 2006 24-Hour PM 2.5 

## NAAQS and

revise the maintenance plan. This re quest will document that existing

enforceable control measures are respons ible for the observed improvement in

air quality.

2. Designate existing controls as sufficient to maintain the NAAQS into the future.

3. Commit to the proposed contingency plan.

These actions must be noticed to allo w public comment and to satisfy USEPA

requirements for public involvement in SIP-rela ted activities. This notice addresses Ohio

## EPA’s reliance on the emission projections as evidence of attain ment and maintenance

and the commitment to institute contingen cy measures if ambient exceedances or

violations trigger the contingency plan requ irements. Written comm ents will be received

on or before May 16, 2012 at the following address:

E-mail: erica.fetty@epa.state.oh.us

Mailing address: Erica Fetty

Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, DAPC

Lazarus Government Center

P.O. Box 1049

Columbus, Ohio 43216-1049

Phone: (614) 644-2310

Pursuant to Section 119.03 of the Ohio Re vised Code, a public hearing on this

redesignation request will be conduc ted as follows: May 16, 2012 at 3:00PM

Steubenville Library – Schiap pa Branch, 4141 Mall Drive, Steubenville, OH 43952.

All interested persons are ent itled to attend or be repres ented at the hearing and give

written or oral comments on these chang es. All oral comments presented at the

hearing, and all written statem ents submitted at the hearing or to the above address by

the close of business on May 16, 2012 will be considered by Ohio EPA prior to final

action on this redesignation. Written stat ements submitted after May 16, 2012 may be

considered as time and circumstances permit, but will not be part of the official record of

the hearing.

This redesignation and maintenance request is available on Ohio EPA’s web page for

electronic downloading at: http://www.epa.ohio.gov/dapc/SIP/annual.aspx . Questions

regarding accessing the web site should be directed to Arunee Niamlarb at 614-728-

1342; other questions or comments about this document should be directed to Erica

Fetty at (614) 644-2310, Erica.Fetty@epa.state.oh.us or mailed to Erica Fetty at the

above address.

## BEFORE THE OHIO EPA

- - -

IN RE: :

:

Redesignation 24-hour Particulate :

Matter 2.5, Steubenville Area :

- - -

Audiotaped public hearing before

Moderator Darla Peele, taken at the Steubenville

Library - Sciappa Branch, 4141 Mall Drive,

Steubenville, Ohio, at 3:00 p.m. on May 16, 2012.

- - -

## P-R-O-C-E-E-D-I-N-G-S

- - -

MODERATOR PEELE: This is the

introduction for the Ohio Environmental

Protection Agency Redesignation 24-hour

Particulate Matter 2.5 for the Steubenville area

hearing held 5-16-12.

My name's Darla Peele. I'm a public

information officer for Ohio EPA. I will be

presiding over today's public hearing. Thank you

for taking the time to attend this hearing before

Ohio EPA.

The purpose of the hearing today is to

obtain comments from any interested person today

regarding Ohio EPA's proposed action.

The State of Ohio plans to ask U.S. EPA

to revise the current air quality designation for

Ohio, the Ohio portion of Jefferson County, of

the Steubenville-Weirton, West Virginia-Ohio area

to attainment with respect to 2006 24-hour PM2.5

national ambient air quality standard. This

redesignation should not be confused with Ohio

EPA's recent request to U.S. EPA for

redesignation of the 1997 annual PM2.5 standards 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

## for which a separate hearing was held recently.

Air quality monitoring data from 2008

through 2010 in the region demonstrated

attainment of the national ambient air quality

standard, and there is evidence that the improved

air quality is due to permanent enforceable

emission reductions.

In addition, existing requirements were

sufficient to maintain the 2006 24-hour PM2.5

standard in this area for at least ten years into

the future.

Computer models show that existing state

and federal emission reduction requirements are

sufficient to attain and maintain the national

ambient air quality standard in the

Steubenville-Weirton area. Therefore, Ohio EPA

proposes to utilize the existing emission

inventory information and projections of future

emissions as a demonstration of the ability to

maintain the national ambient air quality

standard in the Steubenville-Weirton area.

Comments can be submitted until the

close of business today, May 16, 2012. You may

e-mail comments to erika.fetty@epa.ohio.gov. 3

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

## All interested persons are entitled to

attend or be represented and present oral and/or

written comments concerning the proposed action.

All written and oral comments received as a part

of the official record will be considered by the

director of Ohio EPA before a final decision is

made.

Statements submitted after the comment

period closes may be considered as time and

circumstances permit but will not be a part of

the official record of the hearing.

If you wish to present oral testimony at

the hearing today and have not already signed the

registration sheet, please do so at this time.

The sheet is available at the registration table.

Persons will be called in the order in which they

have registered.

There is no cross-examination of the

speakers or representatives of Ohio EPA in

hearings such as this. Ohio EPA hearings provide

citizens the opportunity to submit comments on

the official record. Therefore, we will not be

able to answer questions during the hearing.

However, Ohio EPA staff may ask clarifying 4

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

## questions of the person testifying to ensure the

record is as complete and accurate as possible.

Seeing that there is no one who wishes

to provide testimony, we will go off record. It

is 3:05 p.m. on 5-16-12.

(Break taken until 3:30 p.m.)

MODERATOR PEELE: Back on record.

Seeing no further requests for

testimony, I will remind you that written

comments can be submitted through 5 p.m. on May

16, 2012.

Thank you for attending. No one did

attend. The time is now 3:30 p.m., and this

hearing is adjourned.

* * * 5

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

## C E R T I F I C A T E

- - -

STATE OF OHIO :

SS:

COUNTY OF FRANKLIN :

I, Jennifer L. Parish, Registered

Professional Reporter, do hereby certify that the

foregoing is a true, correct, and complete

transcription of the above-mentioned cassette

tape before the Ohio Environmental Protection

Agency to the best of my ability.

DATED this 22nd day of May, 2012.

_________________________ JENNIFER L. PARISH, RPR

NOTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF OHIO

My Commission Expires: November 23, 2014. 6

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24