alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND CONSOLIDATED
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1.00
<CASH>                                     146,532,480
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              112,266,012
<ALLOWANCES>                                 9,948,000
<INVENTORY>                                110,742,799
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           390,564,157
<PP&E>                                     105,210,336
<DEPRECIATION>                              31,147,512
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             465,787,792
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      101,030,728
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       942,908
<OTHER-SE>                                 357,592,156
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               465,787,792
<SALES>                                    496,818,057
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           496,818,057
<CGS>                                      289,311,462
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              406,621,329
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             93,561,862
<INCOME-TAX>                                31,343,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         62,218,862
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                62,218,862
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.66
        

</TABLE>
§ 104.3 Other definitions. ( a ) *Beneficiary.* The term beneficiary shall mean a person to whom the Personal Representative shall distribute all or part of the award under § 104.52 of this part.
( b ) *Dependents.* The Special Master shall identify as dependents those persons so identified by the victim on his or her Federal tax return for the year prior to the year of the victim's death (or those persons who legally could have been identified by the victim on his or her Federal tax return for the year prior to the year of the victim's death) unless: ( 1 ) The claimant demonstrates that a minor child of the victim was born or adopted on or after January 1 of the year of the victim's death;
( 2 ) Another person became a dependent in accordance with then- applicable law on or after January 1 of the year of the victim's death; or
( 3 ) The victim was not required by law to file a Federal income tax return for the year prior to the year of the victim's death.
( c ) *Spouse.* The Special Master shall identify as the spouse of a victim the person reported as spouse on the victim's Federal tax return for the year prior to the year of the victim's death (or the person who legally could have been identified by the victim on his or her Federal tax return for the year prior to the year of the victim's death) unless: ( 1 ) The victim was married or divorced in accordance with applicable state law on or after January 1 of the year of the victim's death; or
( 2 ) The victim was not required by law to file a Federal income tax return for the year prior to the year of the victim's death.
( 3 ) The Special Master shall identify as the spouse of a victim any same-sex spouse who was lawfully married to the victim under applicable state law.
( d ) *The Act.* The Act, as used in this part, shall mean Public Law 107-42, 115 Stat. 230 (“Air Transportation Safety and System Stabilization Act”), 49 U.S.C. 40101 note, as amended by the James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act of 2010, Title II of Public Law 111-347 and as further amended by the James Zadroga 9/11 Victim Compensation Fund Reauthorization Act, Division O, Title IV of Public Law 114-113.
( e ) *Victim.* The term victim shall mean an eligible injured claimant or a decedent on whose behalf a claim is brought by an eligible Personal Representative.
( f ) *Substantially Complete.* A claim becomes substantially complete when, in the opinion of the Special Master or her designee, the claim contains sufficient information and documentation to determine both the claimant's eligibility and, if the claimant is eligible, an appropriate award.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 54 (Monday, March 21, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 15358]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6474]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Revocation of License of Small Business Investment Company

    Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small 
Business Administration by the Final Order of the United States 
District Court of the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth dated 
April 1, 2009, the United States Small Business Administration hereby 
revokes the license of Trinity SBIC, L.P., a Delaware limited 
partnership, to function as a small business investment company under 
the Small Business Investment Company License No. 0373-0218 issued to 
Trinity SBIC, L.P. on April 4, 2000 and said license is hereby declared 
null and void as of April 1, 2009.

United States Small Business Administration

    Dated: March 4, 2011.
Sean J. Greene,
Associate Administrator for Investment, United States Small Business 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2011-6474 Filed 3-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
# C_2013171EN.01000401.xml

| 15.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 25 April 2013 — European Commission v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

(Case C-86/11) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Taxation - Directive 2006/112/EC - Articles 9 and 11 - National legislation permitting the inclusion of non-taxable persons in a group of persons who may be regarded as a single taxable person for VAT purposes)

2013/C 171/06

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal, acting as Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented by: S. Hathaway, acting as Agent, and M. Hall QC)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the defendant: Czech Republic (represented by: M. Smolek and T. Müller, acting as Agents), Kingdom of Denmark (represented: initially by C. Vang, and subsequently by V. Pasternak Jørgensen, acting as Agents), Ireland (represented by: D. O’Hagan, acting as Agent, assisted by G. Clohessy, SC, and N. Travers, BL), Republic of Finland (represented by: H. Leppo and S. Hartikainen, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Articles 9 and 11 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1) — National legislation permitting the inclusion of non-taxable persons in a VAT group

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs;

| 3. | Orders the Czech Republic, the Kingdom of Denmark, Ireland and the Republic of Finland to bear their own respective costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Czech Republic, the Kingdom of Denmark, Ireland and the Republic of Finland to bear their own respective costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 145, 14.5.2011.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS TABLE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1997 AND THE STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE
PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FORM 10-Q QUARTERLY REPORT.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000055387
<NAME> KENTUCKY UTILITIES COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    1,474,908
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     12,683
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         126,763
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        42,870
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,657,224
<COMMON>                                       308,140
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                        (594)
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            295,608
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 603,154
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     40,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           546,351
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              12,500
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                       21
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 455,198
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                1,657,224
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      178,914
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            15,527
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     129,963
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     145,490
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         33,424
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               1,412
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  34,836
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         9,875
<NET-INCOME>                                    24,961
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        564
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   24,397
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        16,640
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        9,291
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          72,729
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>ALL OUTSTANDING COMMON STOCK OF KENTUCKY UTILITIES COMPANY IS HELD BY ITS
PARENT COMPANY, KU ENERGY CORPORATION.  THEREFORE, EARNINGS PER SHARE IS NOT
APPLICABLE.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
We define training and technical assistance (TTA) as 

providing targeted support using a culturally relevant, 

evidence-based, holistic approach. This TTA is provided to 

support Native communities in their self-determination 

efforts through infrastructure development and capacity 

building, as well as program planning and implementation. 
Menu of Services

Curriculum

 • GONA/GOAN Master Facilitator

• GONA/GOAN Training of Facilitators

• GONA/GOAN (Including Youth)

• Mental Health First Aid

• Youth Mental Health First Aid

• White Bison

•	 Applied	Suicide	Intervention	Skills	Training	

(ASIST)

• Wellbriety

• MBH

•	 Substance	Abuse	Prevention	Training

• Project Venture

•	 American	Indian	Life	Skills

Capacity Building

Research	and	Evaluation

• Community Readiness Assessment

•	 Strategic	Action	Planning

•	 Tribal	Action	Planning

• Needs Assessment

• Asset Mapping

• Project Management

•	 Data	Collection

•	 Social	Marketing

•	 Community	Based	Participatory	Research

Training Topics

 • Cultural Competency 101

•	 Motivational	Interviewing

• Youth Engagement

•	 Youth	Skill	Building

• Historical Trauma

• Digital Storytelling

• LGBTQIA+

•	 Two-Spirit

•	 Trauma-Informed	Care

• Systems of Care

•	 Evidence-based	Interventions

•	 Practice-based	Interventions

•	 Cultural-Based	Interventions

•	 Native	Veterans

• Behavioral Health

•	 Suicide	Prevention

•	 Crisis	Response/Postvention

• SAMHSA Grantees

• Youth Leadership

• Leadership Training

• Technical Assistance Mentorship

• Youth Mentorship

• Lateral Violence

• Opioid Misuse
### §3149. Oil and gas lease applications

#### (a) Lands within National Wildlife Refuge System but not part of National Wilderness Preservation System

Notwithstanding any other provision of law or regulation, whenever the Secretary receives an application for an oil and gas lease pursuant to the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 [30 U.S.C. 181 et seq.] for lands in Alaska within a unit of the National Wildlife Refuge System which are not also part of the national Wilderness Preservation System he shall, in addition to any other requirements of applicable law, follow the procedures set forth in this section.

#### (b) Statement of reasons for decision to issue or not to issue lease

Any decision to issue or not to issue a lease shall be accompanied by a statement setting forth the reasons for the decision, including the reasons why oil and gas leasing would be compatible or incompatible with the purposes of the refuge.

#### (c) Environmental impact statement

If the Secretary determines that the requirements of section 4332(2)(C) of title 42 do not apply to his decision, the Secretary shall render his decision within six months after receipt of a lease application. If such requirements are applicable to the Secretary's decision, he shall render his decision within three months after publication of the final environmental impact statement.

(Pub. L. 96–487, title X, §1009, Dec. 2, 1980, 94 Stat. 2456.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Mineral Leasing Act of 1920, referred to in subsec. (a), is act Feb. 25, 1920, ch. 85, 41 Stat. 437, known as the Mineral Leasing Act, which is classified generally to chapter 3A (§181 et seq.) of Title 30, Mineral Lands and Mining. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 181 of Title 30 and Tables.
# C_2012366EN.01002102.xml

| 24.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 366/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 366/21

---

Order of the Court of 12 July 2012 — Land Wien v European Commission

(Case C-608/11 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Nuclear energy - Extension of the nuclear power station at Mochovce (Slovak Republic) - Commission decision to take no further action on complaint - Action for annulment - Refusal by the Commission to send the documents requested - Action for failure to act - Minimum requirements laid down in Article 44(1)(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court - Inadmissibility)

2012/C 366/37

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Land Wien (represented by: W.-G. Schärf, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: M. Patakia, P. Oliver and G. Wilms, agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 September 2011 in Case T-267/10 Land Wien v Commission, by which the General Court dismissed the applicant’s action seeking, on the one hand, annulment of the Commission’s decision of 25 March 2010 to take no further action on its complaint regarding the project to extend blocks 3 and 4 of the nuclear power station at Mochovce (Slovak Republic) and, on the other hand, a declaration that the Commission failed to act, within the meaning of Article 265 TFEU, to the extent that not all the documents relating to that project were sent to the applicant, in breach of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43) — Infringement of the right of access to documents, of the fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU and of the Euratom Treaty

Land Wien

Commission

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Land Wien is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Land Wien is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 25, 28.1.2012.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 832 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 832

To nullify the Supplemental Treaty Between the United States of America 
  and the Confederated Tribes and Bands of Indians of Middle Oregon, 
                    concluded on November 15, 1865.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 14, 2019

Mr. Merkley (for himself and Mr. Wyden) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To nullify the Supplemental Treaty Between the United States of America 
  and the Confederated Tribes and Bands of Indians of Middle Oregon, 
                    concluded on November 15, 1865.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NULLIFICATION OF TREATY.

    The Supplemental Treaty Between the United States of America and 
the Confederated Tribes and Bands of Indians of Middle Oregon, 
concluded on November 15, 1865, and entered into pursuant to the Senate 
resolution of ratification dated March 2, 1867 (14 Stat. 751), shall 
have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
§ 115.14 Youthful inmates. ( a ) A youthful inmate shall not be placed in a housing unit in which the youthful inmate will have sight, sound, or physical contact with any adult inmate through use of a shared dayroom or other common space, shower area, or sleeping quarters.
( b ) In areas outside of housing units, agencies shall either: ( 1 ) Maintain sight and sound separation between youthful inmates and adult inmates, or
( 2 ) Provide direct staff supervision when youthful inmates and adult inmates have sight, sound, or physical contact.
( c ) Agencies shall make best efforts to avoid placing youthful inmates in isolation to comply with this provision. Absent exigent circumstances, agencies shall not deny youthful inmates daily large-muscle exercise and any legally required special education services to comply with this provision. Youthful inmates shall also have access to other programs and work opportunities to the extent possible.
§ 16.45 Privacy Act access appeals. ( a ) *Requirement for making a Privacy Act access appeal.* A requester may appeal an adverse determination to a Privacy Act request for access to the Office of Information Policy (“OIP”). The contact information for OIP is contained in the FOIA Reference Guide, which is available at *https://www.justice.gov/oip/04_3.html .* Appeals may also be submitted through the web portal accessible on OIP's website. Examples of an adverse determination to a Privacy Act request for access are provided in § 16.43. The requester must make the appeal in writing. To be considered timely, the requester must postmark, or in the case of electronic submissions, submit the request, within 90 calendar days after the date of the adverse determination. The appeal should indicate the assigned request number and clearly identify the component's determination that is being appealed. To facilitate handling, the requester should mark both the appeal letter and envelope, or include in the subject line of any electronic communication, “Privacy Act Access Appeal.”
( b ) *Adjudication of Privacy Act access appeals.* ( 1 ) The Director of OIP, or a designee of the Director of OIP, shall act on behalf of the Attorney General on all Privacy Act access appeals under this section, unless the Attorney General directs otherwise.
( 2 ) Should the Attorney General exercise the right to respond to a Privacy Act request for access, the Attorney General's decision shall serve as the final action of the Department and will not be subject to a Privacy Act access appeal.
( 3 ) A Privacy Act access appeal ordinarily will not be adjudicated if the request becomes a matter of litigation.
( c ) *Responses to Privacy Act access appeals.* ( 1 ) OIP shall make its decision on an appeal in writing.
( 2 ) A decision that upholds a component's adverse determination to the Privacy Act request for access, in whole or in part, shall include a brief statement of the reason(s) for the affirmance, including any Privacy Act exemption applied, and shall provide the requester with notification of the statutory right to file a lawsuit.
( 3 ) A decision that reverses or modifies, in whole or in part, a component's adverse determination to the Privacy Act request for access shall include notice to the requester of the specific reversal or modification. The component(s) shall thereafter further process the request, in accordance with the appeal decision, and respond directly to the requester, as appropriate.
( d ) *When a Privacy Act access appeal is required.* Before seeking review by a court of a component's refusal to grant a Privacy Act request for access, a requester generally must first submit a timely appeal in accordance with this section.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small Business Administration by the Final Order of the United States District Court of the Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth dated April 1, 2009, the United States Small Business Administration hereby revokes the license of Trinity SBIC, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, to function as a small business investment company under the Small Business Investment Company License No. 0373-0218 issued to Trinity SBIC, L.P. on April 4, 2000 and said license is hereby declared null and void as of April 1, 2009.

United States Small Business Administration

Dated: March 4, 2011.

Sean J. Greene,

Associate Administrator for Investment, United States Small Business Administration.

[FR Doc. 2011-6474 Filed 3-18-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P