alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_wvotN.~ 

TlIoI.1OtHlON._cr.u.nv I,. lNtOIIE\J. ,''-

-~­ ~-,­ ~Sf-.ow ...--. --_ --~ ... _- ..... JOE~ -.-.• , _v.-uno 

CHI'IISTOPHtfI4.IXIOOoS, 0...... 

~-­ ...,...1IAI'II'IAStCI.~ _"III9CH,_ 

utIIiLa,t-. 

RNCIP ...... -,. DoOoNti. COoP.l'S, __ _ POfITW,N, ~ 

...,...~.-~ 

~~­ _OOAICI)I, T_ 

~AT .... SIMON, SfiOH OIRECTOR 

$No< '-- FoYVU'FI. CHI9 COlJNSfL 

~ CAAIPIl[Ll., FlE"IJI!l.IC.O.N Sf""" CWII'Cl'OfI KNIt" K h.LUPS. REPO!IIJCN< CHEF COUNstl 

The !-Ionorable Steven Chu 

Secretary 

U.S. Department of Energy 

1000 Independence Ave. SW 

Washin gton, D.C. 20585 

Dear Mr. Secretary: 

'l1nitcd ~mtc's ~cmltC COMMITTEE ON 

ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES 

W ASHINGTON. DC 20S10--6150 

ENERGY.SENATE.GOV 

October 26, 2012 

We are writing to endorse the petition recently sent to the Department of Energy (DOE) from a 

large coalition of electric motor manufacturers, energy effi ciency advocates and others who have 

proposed consensus energy conservation standards for e lectric motors (Doc ket No. EERE·201 O-BT-STD0027). We commend these stakeholders in DOE's highly-successful appliance standards program for their 

initiative in coming together to develop a consensus proposa l that could provide among the largest energy 

savings ever achieved under a DOE efficiency rulemaking. We urge you to give this proposal careful and 

serious consideration for adoption in the Department's electric motor rulemaking. 

Strengths of this petition lie in the early and contin uing collaboration of the many stakeholders 

who deve loped it, its straightforwardness, and its feasibility. We applaud the combined efforts of 

manufacturers and energy-efficiency advocates fo r continuing the tradition of collaboration that has built 

a solid foundation for DOE's appliance standards program and that has contributed to the establishment 

of stable and progressive national energy efficiency policies and regulations. We encourage DOE to adopt 

the principles and content of the petition and begin saving the most energy possible, as soon as possible, 

and as feasibly as possible. We are concerned that if DOE seeks energy savings beyond those proposed by 

this coalition, that the increased costs to manufacturers and end-users, the increased uncertainty in the 

scope, levels, and duration of electric motor standards, and inevitable delays would result in less savings 

and fewer overall benefits to the Nation than would be achieved by adopting this consensus petition as 

soon as possible. 

Thank you for your continued leadership in achieving the many benefits of energy efficiency for 

our Nation, and for your consideration of our views on this important electric motor ru lemaking. 

Sincerely,
# C_2013114EN.01001502.xml

| 20.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 114/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 114/15

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 21 February 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil de Alicante — Spain) — Fédération Cynologique Internationale v Federación Canina Internacional de Perros de Pura Raza

(Case C-561/11) (1)

1

(Community trade marks - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 9(1) - Concept of ‘third party’ - Proprietor of a later Community trade mark)

2013/C 114/21

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Juzgado de lo Mercantil de Alicante

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Fédération Cynologique Internationale

Applicant:

Defendant: Federación Canina Internacional de Perros de Pura Raza

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Juzgado de lo Mercantil de Alicante — Interpretation of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1) — Infringement or threat of infringement of a Community trade mark — Exclusive right conferred by a Community trade mark — Meaning of third party

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 9(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark must be interpreted as meaning that the exclusive right of the proprietor of a Community trade mark to prohibit all third parties from using, in the course of trade, signs identical with or similar to its trade mark extends to a third-party proprietor of a later registered Community trade mark, without the need for that latter mark to have been declared invalid beforehand.

---

(1)  OJ C 25, 28.1.2012.

1

---
### §110d. Mount Rainier National Park Boundary Adjustment

#### (a) Boundary adjustment

The boundary of Mount Rainier National Park is modified to include the area within the boundary generally depicted on the map entitled "Mount Rainier National Park, Carbon River Boundary Adjustment", numbered 105/92,002B, and dated June 2003. The Secretary of the Interior shall keep the map on file in the appropriate offices of the National Park Service.

#### (b) Land acquisition

The Secretary of the Interior may acquire, only with the consent of the owner, by donation, purchase with donated or appropriated funds, or exchange—

(1) land or interests in land, totaling not more than 800 acres, and improvements thereon within the boundary generally depicted on the map referred to in subsection (a) for development of camping and other recreational facilities; and

(2) land or interests in land, totaling not more than one acre, and improvements thereon in the vicinity of Wilkeson, Washington, for a facility to serve visitors to public lands along the Carbon and Mowich Corridors.

#### (c) Administration of acquired lands

Lands acquired under this section shall be administered by the Secretary of the Interior as part of Mount Rainier National Park in accordance with applicable laws and regulations.

(Pub. L. 108–312, §3, Oct. 5, 2004, 118 Stat. 1194.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

For short title of Pub. L. 108–312, which enacted this section, as the Mount Rainier National Park Boundary Adjustment Act of 2004, see section 1 of Pub. L. 108–312, set out as a note under section 91 of this title.

#### Findings

Pub. L. 108–312, §2, Oct. 5, 2004, 118 Stat. 1194, provided that: "The Congress finds the following:

"(1) The Carbon River watershed within Pierce County in the State of Washington has unique qualities of ecological, economic, and educational importance, including clean water, productive salmon streams, important wildlife habitat, active geologic processes, outdoor recreational opportunities, scenic beauty, educational opportunities, and diverse economic opportunities.

"(2) Mount Rainier National Park is one of the premier attractions in the State of Washington, providing recreational, educational, and economic opportunities that will be enhanced by the construction of new campgrounds and visitor contact facilities in the Carbon River valley outside old-growth forest habitats and above the flood plain.

"(3) Coordination of management across national forest and national park lands in this corridor will enhance the conservation of the forest ecosystem and public enjoyment of these public lands.

"(4) Protection and development of historic and recreational facilities in the Carbon River valley, such as trails and visitor centers, can be facilitated by the National Park Service."
# C_2013164EN.01000502.xml

| 8.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 164/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 164/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 April 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Sibiu — Romania) — Mariana Irimie v Administrația Finanțelor Publice Sibiu, Administrația Fondului pentru Mediu

(Case C-565/11) (1)

1

(Repayment of taxes levied by a Member State in breach of European Union law - National system limiting the interest payable by the Member State on the repaid tax - Interest calculated from the day following the date of the claim for repayment of the tax - Non-compliance with European Union law - Principle of effectiveness)

2013/C 164/08

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunalul Sibiu

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Mariana Irimie

Applicant:

Defendants: Administrația Finanțelor Publice Sibiu, Administrația Fondului pentru Mediu

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Tribunalul Sibiu — Interpretation of the principles of equivalence, effectiveness and proportionality, and of Article 6 TEU and Article 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Whether it is permissible for national legislation to restrict the amount which may be obtained by way of compensation for damage suffered by individuals as a result of the breach of European Union law by a Member State — Reimbursement of statutory interest relating to a tax refund

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

European Union law must be interpreted as precluding a national system, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which limits the interest granted on repayment of a tax which was levied in breach of European Union law to that accruing from the day following the date of the claim for repayment of that tax.

---

(1)  OJ C 25, 28.1.2012.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice (11-022)]

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) announces a meeting of the Astrophysics Subcommittee of the NASA Advisory Council (NAC). This Subcommittee reports to the Science Committee of the NAC. The Meeting will be held for the purpose of soliciting from the scientific community and other persons scientific and technical information relevant to program planning. 

# DATES:

Thursday, April 7, 2011, 2 p.m. to 4 p.m., Local Time.

# ADDRESSES:

                        This meeting will take place telephonically and by WebEx. Any interested person may call the USA toll free conference call number 888-469-                              ( print page 14107)                            1171 or toll number 630-395-0075, pass code APS, to participate in this meeting by telephone. The WebEx link is                         *https://nasa.webex.com,*                         meeting number 990 150 191, and password APSApril7-2011.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting will be open to the public. The agenda for the meeting includes the following topic:

—Astrophysics Division Update.

It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants.

Dated: March 9, 2011.

P. Diane Rausch, 

Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

[FR Doc. 2011-6013 Filed 3-14-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
§ 115.288 Data review for corrective action. ( a ) The agency shall review data collected and aggregated pursuant to § 115.287 in order to assess and improve the effectiveness of its sexual abuse prevention, detection, and response policies, practices, and training, including: ( 1 ) Identifying problem areas;
( 2 ) Taking corrective action on an ongoing basis; and
( 3 ) Preparing an annual report of its findings and corrective actions for each facility, as well as the agency as a whole.
( b ) Such report shall include a comparison of the current year's data and corrective actions with those from prior years and shall provide an assessment of the agency's progress in addressing sexual abuse.
( c ) The agency's report shall be approved by the agency head and made readily available to the public through its Web site or, if it does not have one, through other means.
( d ) The agency may redact specific material from the reports when publication would present a clear and specific threat to the safety and security of a facility, but must indicate the nature of the material redacted.
§ 104.51 Payments to eligible individuals. ( a ) *Payment date.* Subject to paragraph (c) of this section, the Special Master shall authorize payment of an award to a claimant not later than 20 days after the date on which: ( 1 ) The claimant accepts the presumed award; or
( 2 ) A final award for the claimant is determined after a hearing on appeal.
( b ) *Failure to accept or appeal presumed award.* If a claimant fails to accept or appeal the presumed award determined for that claimant within 30 days, the presumed award shall be deemed to have been accepted and all rights to appeal the award shall have been waived.
( c ) *Payment of Group A claims.* Group A claims shall be paid as soon as practicable from the capped amount appropriated for such claims of $2,775,000,000.
( d ) *Payment of Group B claims.* Group B claims may be paid after the date on which new Group B claims may be filed under these regulations from the amount appropriated for Group A claims if and to the extent that there are funds remaining after all Group A claims have been paid and, thereafter, from the $4,600,000,000 amount appropriated specifically for Group B claims once it becomes available in fiscal year 2017 until expended.
( e ) *Prioritization.* The Special Master shall identify claims that present the most debilitating physical conditions and shall prioritize the compensation of such claims so that claimants with such debilitating conditions are not unduly burdened.
( f ) *Reassessment.* Commencing on December 18, 2017, and continuing at least annually thereafter until the closure of the Victim Compensation Fund, the Special Master shall review and reassess policies and procedures and make such adjustments as may be necessary to ensure that the total expenditures including administrative costs in providing compensation for claims in Group B do not exceed the funds deposited into the Victim Compensation Fund and to ensure that the compensation of those claimants who suffer from the most debilitating physical conditions is prioritized to avoid undue burden on such claimants.
§ 115.186 Sexual abuse incident reviews. ( a ) The lockup shall conduct a sexual abuse incident review at the conclusion of every sexual abuse investigation, including where the allegation has not been substantiated, unless the allegation has been determined to be unfounded.
( b ) Such review shall ordinarily occur within 30 days of the conclusion of the investigation.
( c ) The review team shall include upper-level management officials, with input from line supervisors and investigators.
( d ) The review team shall: ( 1 ) Consider whether the allegation or investigation indicates a need to change policy or practice to better prevent, detect, or respond to sexual abuse;
( 2 ) Consider whether the incident or allegation was motivated by race; ethnicity; gender identity; lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or intersex identification, status, or perceived status; or gang affiliation; or was motivated or otherwise caused by other group dynamics at the lockup;
( 3 ) Examine the area in the lockup where the incident allegedly occurred to assess whether physical barriers in the area may enable abuse;
( 4 ) Assess the adequacy of staffing levels in that area during different shifts;
( 5 ) Assess whether monitoring technology should be deployed or augmented to supplement supervision by staff; and
( 6 ) Prepare a report of its findings, including but not necessarily limited to determinations made pursuant to paragraphs (d)(1) through (d)(5) of this section, and any recommendations for improvement and submit such report to the lockup head and agency PREA coordinator.
( e ) The lockup shall implement the recommendations for improvement, or shall document its reasons for not doing so.
§ 367.4117 Account 411.7, Losses from disposition of service company plant. ( a ) The service company must record in this account losses resulting from the settlement of asset retirement obligations related to service company plant in accordance with the accounting prescribed in General Instructions in § 367.22.
( b ) Income taxes relating to losses, recorded in this account must be recorded in Account 409.1, Income Taxes, operating income (§ 367.4091).
In the Interest of D.S.O.,

ChildAppellant/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 30, 2014

No. 04-14-00061-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF D.S.O., Child,

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-PA-01423

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The District Clerk’s Notification of Late Record is GRANTED. The clerk’s record is due

on February 3, 2014.

cms

_________________________________

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 30th day of January, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
#### Talley *v.*Mitchell *et al.*

March 19, 1910.

Petition for injunction. Before Judge Bell. Fulton superior court.

September 9, 1909.

*R. B. Blackburn,*for plaintiff.

*C.*IF. *Smith*and *M. A. Hale,*for defendant. ■

Beck, J.

Under tlie decisions of this court in the case of *Weaver*v. *Roberson,*ante, 149 (67 S. E. 662), and the eases'there cited, the bourt did not err in refusing to-grant the injunction sought.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices, concur, except Fish, G. J., absent.*
# C_2013367EN.01000202.xml

| 14.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 367/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 367/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 24 October 2013 — Kone Oyj, Kone GmbH, Kone BV v European Commission

(C-510/11 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Market for the installation and maintenance of elevators and escalators - Fines - Notice on immunity from fines and reduction of fines in cartel cases - Effective judicial remedy)

2013/C 367/03

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellants: Kone Oyj, Kone GmbH, Kone BV (represented by: T. Vinje, Solicitor, D. Paemen, avocat, and A. Tomtsis, dikigoros,)

Appellants:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: E. Gippini Fournier and R. Sauer, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 July 2011 in Case T-151/07 Kone and Others v Commission, by which the General Court dismissed an action for annulment or reduction of the fine imposed on the applicants by Commission Decision C(2007) 512 final of 21 February 2007 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty (Case COMP/E 1/38.823 — Elevators and Escalators), concerning a cartel in the market for the installation and maintenance of elevators and escalators in Belgium, Germany, Luxembourg and the Netherlands, concerning bid-rigging, market-sharing, price-fixing, the awarding of projects and contracts related thereto and exchange of information

Kone and Others

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Kone Oyj, Kone GmbH and Kone BV to bear their own costs and, in addition, to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Kone Oyj, Kone GmbH and Kone BV to bear their own costs and, in addition, to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 362, 10.12.2011.

1

---
Exhibit


EXHIBIT 10.6


RESOLUTIONS OF 
THE RETIREMENT BENEFITS COMMMITTE OF
HOMESTREET, INC. 401(k) SAVINGS PLAN




WHEREAS, to maintain the tax-qualified status of the HomeStreet, Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan (the “Plan”), the Plan must be amended and restated periodically to incorporate previously-adopted amendments and to bring the Plan into compliance with current law;
WHEREAS, Management has recommended to the Retirement Benefits Committee (the “Committee”) that the Committee amend and restate the Plan effective January 1, 2015, to (1) incorporate previously adopted amendments and make other administrative changes, and (2) add an in-Plan Roth conversion provision to the Plan effective January 1, 2016, or such later date as implemented by the Committee, to allow participants the option of converting their pre-tax Plan contributions to after-tax Roth contributions; and file the Plan for an updated IRS determination letter ruling on the tax-qualified status of the Plan;
WHEREAS, the Committee, to which the Board of Directors of HomeStreet, Inc. (the “Board”) has delegated authority to amend the HomeStreet, Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan (the “Plan”) when such amendments either keep the Plan in compliance with applicable law or make changes to the Plan that are administrative in nature, has concluded that this recommendation should be approved and implemented;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the amended and restated Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference, is hereby adopted as of the dates stated therein.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Management is hereby authorized and directed (1) to file the Plan with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for the purpose of obtaining an updated IRS determination letter, and (2) to adopt any amendments that may be required as a condition of favorable IRS determination letter.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that any authorized officer of the Employer is hereby authorized to execute such amended and restated Plan on behalf of the Employer.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that any member of the Committee is hereby authorized to certify to the taking of these actions by the Committee.







CERTIFICATION




The undersigned hereby certifies that the attached is a true copy of Resolutions adopted at the ______________________, 2015, meeting of the Retirement Benefits Committee of the HomeStreet, Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan (the “Plan”), reflecting the amendment and restatement of the Plan to add an in-Plan Roth conversion provision effective January 1, 2016.  The attached Resolutions are included in the minutes of such meeting, are on file, in the corporate minute book, and have not been altered, amended, or revoked.
DATED this _________ day of _______________________, 2015.
HOMESTREET, INC.






By _________________________________


      Its _________________________________