alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
7 a NT OF THE 1N SO OS .- Sm —— a Gp © ep a =—S_—S——O* Oe SE OS —E—E ——— ae eee i nT ee - etl el sa — * _ —

CORRELATION OF MAP UNTTS

12°00" SURFICIAL DEPOSITS VOLCANIC ROCKS
" ,
. . on . : San Franedieoo Velcante Field
i F f (Prem Meore and Welfe, 1976) .
*s a : = :
a Re he i F g j “ ae | Sunset
2 inp | petals || EIT Te! | fet=
. : aed ee he ee ; ma, 4. Qe
ee ts ue ee: 7 Saint . Lee i fee ; * nin 2 a) ‘ieitiaeamamal
- a : ~ ce ; a vo 7 i es. J ] q ab
a ’ ; P Pee ee | = Vatay Qao Obes
f “5 Li , hy xy ? \e ele cn, ip TM =_ 44 ee Woodliouse
' ; Of Pamel NAO gr cil 7. ts = |
_! Vie t F i » be ay ae , ’ 5 ved” ’ r asf =
a a rs be * vr ee fe  *
‘. LA : tay. ie j Greer. « tol. Cas HOPI BUTTES VOLCANIC FIELD TERTIARY
P : ‘ as ee ptt ys ee. en tev | Ti | Te
Bs i) ~ om . TbL
: Redes = - i P ; J
SEtpomxTARY ROCKS
Per
; - - Pee
| UPPER TRIASSIC
; ast
Lae
ail MEDDLE? AND
La LOWER TRIASSIC
Pk
Pte

: 3 ONFORMITY
| ss PERMEAN
aly
was
= + - j a
RAte ante gh * -

: alt | ~
an < , ;
| "4? =z 5 4
ae ‘ he
~ ‘ ee. a
| ze i: **' sy ¥
* aon Nee ee :
= : 3

- * a bon mail gi

FI eae i 8 i

Pig os SS sachs feat
de ‘ie = . ow

ele : ee

as

112°00°

Base from U.S. Genlogiéel Survey, wre

5 o 5 10 is 20 Statute Miles

_ = wri 4 4 rmcaere i) 5 10 15 20 25 30 Kilometers SECTIONIZED TOWNSHIP
> P — : ;
ws AMISELES 5 -_ 0 5 10 T5 Nautical Mites oe Raps at) |
re ta 7:89 10:11:12

CONTOUR INTERVAL 200 FEET
a WITH SUPPLEMENTARY CONTOURS AT 100 FOOT INTERVALS

18:17-16/15 14:13 a 7

*
TRANSVERSE MERCATOR PROJECTION : ee
— ~ 19/20 21 22-23: 24
— a BLACK NUMBERED LINES INDICATE THE 10,000 METER UNIVERSAL TRANSVERSE MERCATOR GRID. ZONE 12 *
ad 30: 29) 28527, 26: 25
_— je 1970 MAGNETIC DECLINATION FROM TRUE NORTH VARIES FROM 1435" (260 MILS) EASTERLY FOR
— - THE CENTER OF THE WEST EDGE TO 14° (250 MILS) EASTERLY FOR THE CENTER OF THE EAST EDGE 1299) 35) 9h 38 (a8
Tr = i Sik . 3 3

TOWNSHIP OR RANGE LINE
LAND GRANT BOUNDARY =——.. ___ .. ___
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 16, 2020

b1013

Order 

Clerk

October 16, 2020

161945 & (43)

DEREK SHAW,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 161945

COA: 352851

Sanilac CC: 14-035535-DM

ELIZABETH SHAW,

Defendant-Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The 

application for leave to appeal the August 12, 2020 order of the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented 

should be reviewed by this Court.
#### In the Matter of Morris Grossman, an Attorney, Respondent. Association of the Bar of the City of New York, Petitioner.

First Department,

June 22, 1943.

*339
      *Einar Chrystie*for petitioner.

*Morris Grossman,*respondent in person.

*Per Curiam.*

The respondent is charged with having converted to his own use the sum of $1,382.46 received by him as executor of the estate of one Samuel Kreizer, deceased. It is also charged that he failed to comply with the directions of a decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Queens County, entered on January 30, 1942, directing payments out of said fund to certain legatees aggregating $933.58. It is further charged that after the respondent had been notified that the matter was under investigation by the petitioner, he borrowed $500 from his brother and turned that amount over to an attorney representing certain of the legatees for payment to them. At the date of the hearing before the petitioner’s committee on grievances, the respondent was still in default of payments under the aforesaid decree aggregating $143.62. Since that time the balance has been paid in full by the respondent.

In answer to the petition, the respondent admits the facts alleged. In explanation of his misconduct, he pleads that he used the aforesaid funds because of the immediate financial necessities of himself and his family. He says that he expected to be able to repay same upon the consummation of a number of pending matters which, however, failed to materialize. He has been a member of the Bar for thirty-nine years and has never before been charged with misconduct. He is sixty years of age and is unable to obtain employment outside the legal profession, which field holds forth his only hope of earning a livelihood for himself and his family.

In view of the fact that full restitution has been made by the respondent and taking into consideration other mitigating circumstances, the respondent should be censured.

Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer and Dore, JJ., concur; Glennon, J., taking no part.

Bespondent censured.
Exhibit






December 31, 2015




Re:    Renewal of Amended and Restated Retention Agreement
Dear David:
This letter is to serve as your notification that Ply Gem Industries, Inc. has elected to execute its Renewal Term right under your current Amended and Restated Retention Agreement dated December 31, 2008 for a period of one year.  As such, all applicable rights and terms as outlined in your Amended and Restated Retention Agreement will remain in effect through December 31, 2016.
Please sign this letter in the space provided below as your acknowledgement and agreement of this Renewal Term agreement and return this original to me, and retain a copy for your own records.


	
		
	 
	Sincerely,

	 
	 

	 
	PLY GEM INDUSTRIES, INC.

	 
	 

	 
	By:  /s/ Gary E. Robinette

	 
	Name:  Gary E. Robinette

	 
	Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer

	 
	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	Acknowledged and Agreed:
	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	/s/ David Schmoll
	 

	David Schmoll
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 25, 2022

No. 04-22-00234-CR

April TOLBERT-DAVIS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018-CR-4920

Honorable Jefferson Moore, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Ms. Debra A. Doolittle is one of the court reporters responsible for preparing, certifying, 

and filing the reporter’s record in this appeal. Ms. Doolittle’s record originally was due on May 

31, 2022. On June 10, 2022, Ms. Doolittle filed a notification of late record stating she 

anticipated the record to be fifty pages and should be completed by July 10, 2022 (a Sunday). 

On June 13, 2022, we granted Ms. Doolittle’s request for a forty-day-extension of time and 

ordered her to file her reporter’s record no later than July 11, 2022. Our order stated that, 

because the length of the record is only fifty pages, further requests for an extension of time will 

be disfavored in the absence of extraordinary circumstances. 

On July 21, 2022, Ms. Doolittle filed another notification of late record citing various 

reasons for her delay and requesting an extension until July 27, 2022. Ms. Doolittle states the 

record is twenty pages long, and not fifty pages. 

We GRANT Ms. Doolittle’s request for an extension of time and ORDER her to file her 

reporter’s record no later than July 27, 2022. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS WILL BE 

GRANTED.

_________________________________

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

FILE COPY
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 25th day of July, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE OCTOBER
31, 2000 BALANCE SHEET AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
OCTOBER 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-2000
<CASH>                                          46,032
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,032
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 112,104
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           72,571
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        32,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   112,104
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,428
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (17,428)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (17,428)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (17,428)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
# C_2010260EN.01001901.xml

| 25.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/19

---

Action brought on 15 July 2010 — Crocs v OHIM — Holey Soles and Partenaire Hospitalier International (Representation of footwear)

(Case T-302/10)

()

2010/C 260/26

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Crocs, Inc. (Delaware, USA) (represented by: I. R. Craig, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Holey Soles Holdings Ltd (Vancouver, Canada) and Partenaire Hospitalier International (La Haie Foissière, France)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 26 March 2010 in case R 9/2008-3; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 26 March 2010 in case R 9/2008-3;

| — | Order the defendant to bear the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to bear the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community design subject of the application for a declaration of invalidity: No 257001-0001 (footwear)

Registered Community design subject of the application for a declaration of invalidity:

Proprietor of the Community design cited in the invalidity proceedings: The applicant

Proprietor of the Community design cited in the invalidity proceedings:

Party requesting the declaration of invalidity of the Community design: The other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Party requesting the declaration of invalidity of the Community design:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Declared the Community design invalid

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: The applicant claims that the contested decision infringes Articles 7(1) and 6(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002, as the Board of Appeal wrongly applied the provisions of these articles and was led to incorrect conclusions in relation to the novelty, the individual character and the technical function of the Community design.

Pleas in law:

---
### §160j. Roads accessible to public facilities

The Secretary is authorized to make provision for such roads within the park as are, or will be, necessary to assure access from present and future State roads to public facilities within the park.

(Pub. L. 91–661, §305, Jan. 8, 1971, 84 Stat. 1973.)
§ 385.207 Petitions (Rule 207). ( a ) *General rule.* A person must file a petition when seeking: ( 1 ) Relief under subpart I, J, or K of this part;
( 2 ) A declaratory order or rule to terminate a controversy or remove uncertainty;
( 3 ) Action on appeal from a staff action, other than a decision or ruling of a presiding officer, under Rule 1902;
( 4 ) A rule of general applicability; or
( 5 ) Any other action which is in the discretion of the Commission and for which this chapter prescribes no other form of pleading.
( b ) *Declarations of intent under the Federal Power Act.* For purposes of this part, a declaration of intent under section 23(b) of the Federal Power Act is treated as a petition for a declaratory order.
( c ) Except as provided in § 381.302(b), each petition for issuance of a declaratory order must be accompanied by the fee prescribed in § 381.302(a).
[Order 225, 47 FR 19022, May 3, 1982, as amended by Order 395, 49 FR 35357, Sept. 7, 1984]
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 858 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 858

   To require the Secretary of Defense to provide blood testing for 
   firefighters of the Department of Defense to determine potential 
  exposure to perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 25, 2019

 Mrs. Shaheen (for herself and Ms. Murkowski) introduced the following 
   bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed 
                                Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require the Secretary of Defense to provide blood testing for 
   firefighters of the Department of Defense to determine potential 
  exposure to perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Military Firefighters 
from PFAS Act''.

SEC. 2. PROVISION OF BLOOD TESTING FOR FIREFIGHTERS OF DEPARTMENT OF 
              DEFENSE TO DETERMINE EXPOSURE TO PERFLUOROALKYL AND 
              POLYFLUOROALKYL SUBSTANCES.

    The Secretary of Defense shall provide blood testing to determine 
and document potential exposure to perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl 
substances (commonly known as ``PFAS'') for each firefighter of the 
Department of Defense during the annual physical exam conducted by the 
Department for each such firefighter.
                                 <all>
```
Comment Info: ================= General Comment:See attached file(s)
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 729 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

<DOC>

                                                        Calendar No. 35
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 729

To prohibit the use of funds to Federal agencies to establish a panel, 
   task force, advisory committee, or other effort to challenge the 
    scientific consensus on climate change, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 7, 2019

  Mr. Schumer (for himself, Mr. Carper, Mr. Reed, Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. 
  Whitehouse, Mr. Markey, Mr. Schatz, Ms. Smith, Mr. Blumenthal, Mrs. 
   Shaheen, Mr. Booker, Ms. Stabenow, Ms. Klobuchar, Ms. Hassan, Mr. 
 Merkley, and Mrs. Feinstein) introduced the following bill; which was 
                          read the first time

                             March 11, 2019

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the use of funds to Federal agencies to establish a panel, 
   task force, advisory committee, or other effort to challenge the 
    scientific consensus on climate change, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS TO CHALLENGE SCIENTIFIC 
              CONSENSUS ON CLIMATE CHANGE.

    No amounts appropriated or otherwise made available to a Federal 
agency (as defined in section 1004 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act (42 
U.S.C. 6903) and including the Executive Office of the President) may 
be used to establish or operate a panel, task force, other advisory 
committee, or other effort intended to challenge the scientific 
consensus on climate change, as presented in the assessment required 
under section 106 of the Global Change Research Act of 1990 (15 U.S.C. 
2936).
                                                        Calendar No. 35

116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 729

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To prohibit the use of funds to Federal agencies to establish a panel, 
   task force, advisory committee, or other effort to challenge the 
    scientific consensus on climate change, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 11, 2019

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar
```
-  Home 

# In This Section

                      -  The GLS Today                          -  What does the GLS do? 
                        -  The St. Lawrence Seaway Management Corporation 
                        -  The Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Seaway System 
                        -  Meet the Administrator 
                        -  Meet Our Team 
                        -  Careers at the GLS 
                        -  Contact the GLS 
                      -  Historic Photos and Other Artifacts 

## Contact the GLS

Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation (GLS)Policy HeadquartersU.S. Department of Transportation
1200 New Jersey Ave, SE W62-300Washington, DC20590United States

**Email:**GLS@dot.gov**Phone:**202-366-0091****Alt Phone:**800-785-2779****Fax:**202-366-7147****Business Hours:**8:00am-5:00 pm ET, M-F

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

                            - GLS on Facebook
                            - GLS on Twitter
                            - GLS on Instagram
                            - Great Lakes - St. Lawrence Seaway

# GLS Advisory Board meeting minutes June 25, 2020

Advisory Board Meeting Minutes (06-25-2020).pdf (214.69 KB)
HomeLatest FilingsPrevious Page

    - SEC Home  »
    - Search the Next-Generation EDGAR System  »
    - Company Search  »
    - Current Page

ONE RIVERWAY, SUITE 2000HOUSTON TX 77056         

ONE RIVERWAY, SUITE 2000HOUSTON TX 77056         713.403.8250

CAZ Strategic Opportunities Fund CIK#: 0001984165 (see all company filings)
State location: TX | State of Inc.: **DE** | Fiscal Year End: 1231Get **insider transactions** for this **issuer**.File Number: **812-15493**

||
||
### §1423f. Implementation of actions taken by the Commission

#### (a) In general

The Secretary shall take all necessary actions to implement the decisions and determinations of the Commission under paragraph 7 of article 8 of the Agreement.

#### (b) Taking limitation

Not later than 60 days after the date on which the Secretary receives notice of the determination of the Commission of an annual taking limit, or of the adoption by the Commission of other restriction on the taking of polar bears for subsistence purposes, the Secretary shall publish a notice in the Federal Register announcing the determination or restriction.

(Pub. L. 92–522, title V, §507, as added Pub. L. 109–479, title IX, §902(a), Jan. 12, 2007, 120 Stat. 3664.)
EXHIBIT 32.1



                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In  connection  with the Annual  Report of Golden  Enterprises,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 3, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark W.
McCutcheon,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss.906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated:  August 29, 2005



/s/Mark W. McCutcheon
---------------------
Mark W. McCutcheon
President and Chief Executive Officer



A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Golden Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by Golden Enterprises,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon
request.


                                       56