alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Independent Accountants' Report -
Attestation on Management's Assertion About Compliance With
The Servicing Requirements of the Distribution Financial Services
Floorplan Master Trust Pooling and Servicing Agreement and
Series 2000-1, 2000-2, 2000-3, and 2000-4 Supplements

Distribution Financial Services Floorplan Master Trust
c/o The Chase Manhattan Bank, as Trustee:

Deutsche Financial Services Corporation, as Servicer:

We have examined the accompanying assertion made by management
on Deutsche Financial Services Corporation's (DFS) compliance,
as servicer, with the servicing requirements in Article III,
Sections 3.1, 3.2, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, and 3.9, and Article IV of the
Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the Distribution Financial
Services Floorplan Master Trust dated December 1, 1993, amended
and restated as of April 1, 1994, amended as of January 24, 1996,
amended and restated as of October 1, 1996, and amended and
restated as of April 1, 2000 (the Agreement), and the applicable
provisions of the Series 2000-1 Supplement dated as of April 1,
2000, the Series 2000-2 Supplement dated as of April 1, 2000,
the Series 2000-3 Supplement dated as of July 1, 2000, and
the Series 2000-4 Supplement dated as of July 1, 2000 (the Supplements),
among Deutsche Floorplan Receivables, L.P., as seller; DFS, as servicer;
and The Chase Manhattan Bank, as Trustee, for the year ended
December 31, 2000.  Management is responsible for DFS' compliance
with the aforementioned sections of the Agreement and the
applicable provisions of the Supplements.  Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on management's assertion about DFS'
compliance based upon our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established
by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about
DFS' compliance with the aforementioned sections of the Agreement
and the applicable provisions of the Supplements, and performing
such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances.  We believe that our examination provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not
provide a legal determination on DFS' compliance with the
specified sections of the Agreement and the applicable provisions
of the Supplements.

In our opinion, management's assertion that DFS was in compliance
with the aforementioned sections of the Agreement and the
applicable provisions of the Supplements for the year ended
December 31, 2000 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

By:    KPMG LLP
       10 South Broadway - Suite 900
       St. Louis, MO 63102-1761

Date:  January 19, 2001
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Feather Valley  Financial,
Ltd.,  on Form  10-QSB for the  period  ending  June 30,  2001 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "REPORT"),  the
undersigned,  Raul Castro,  Chief  Executive  Officer and  Principal  Accounting
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ Raul Castro
Raul Castro
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 25.55 Responsibilities of insurance carriers. ( a ) By no later than March 31, 2009, and on a monthly basis as designated by the operator, any individual or entity acting as an insurance carrier conducting business within the United States shall provide, or cause to be provided on its behalf, to the operator and in a format acceptable to the operator, a report that contains an inventory of all automobiles of the current model year or any of the four prior model years that the carrier, during the past month, has obtained possession of and has decided are junk automobiles or salvage automobiles. An insurance carrier shall report on any automobiles that it has determined to be a total loss under the law of the applicable jurisdiction (*i.e.* , state) or designated as a total loss by the insurance company under the terms of its policies.
( b ) The inventory must contain the following information: ( 1 ) The name, address, and contact information for the reporting entity (insurance carrier);
( 2 ) VIN;
( 3 ) The date on which the automobile was obtained or designated as a junk or salvage automobile;
( 4 ) The name of the individual or entity from whom the automobile was obtained and who possessed it when the automobile was designated as a junk or salvage automobile; and
( 5 ) The name of the owner of the automobile at the time of the filing of the report.
( c ) Insurance carriers are strongly encouraged to provide the operator with information on other motor vehicles or other information relevant to a motor vehicle's title, including the reason why the insurance carrier obtained possession of the motor vehicle. For example, the insurance carrier may have obtained possession of a motor vehicle because it had been subject to flood, water, collision, or fire damage, or as a result of theft and recovery. The provision of information provided by an insurance carrier under this paragraph must be pursuant to a means approved by the operator.
( d ) Insurance carriers whose required data is provided to the operator through an operator-authorized third party in a manner acceptable to the operator are not required to duplicate such reporting. For example, if the operator and a private third-party organization reach agreement on the provision of insurance data already reported by insurance to the third party, insurance companies are not required to subsequently report the information directly into NMVTIS.
§ 381.302 Petition for issuance of a declaratory order (except under Part I of the Federal Power Act). ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the fee established for filing a petition for issuance of a declaratory order under § 385.207 of this chapter is $37,760. The fee must be submitted in accordance with subpart A of this part.
( b ) No fee is necessary to file a petition for issuance of a declaratory order that solely concerns the investigation, issuance, transfer, renewal, revocation, and enforcement of licenses and permits for the construction, operation, and maintenance of dams, water conduits, reservoirs, powerhouses, transmission lines, or other works for the development and improvement of navigation and for the development and utilization of power across, along, from, or in navigable waters under Part I of the Federal Power Act.
( c ) A person claiming the exemption provided in paragraph (b) of this section must file an original and two copies of a petition for exemption in lieu of a fee along with its petition for issuance of a declaratory order. The petition for exemption should summarize the issues raised in the petition for issuance of a declaratory order and explain why the exemption is applicable. The Commission or its designee will analyze each petition to determine whether the petition has met the standards for exemption and will notify the applicant whether it is granted or denied. If the petition is denied, the petitioner will have thirty days from the date of notification of the denial to submit the appropriate fee to the Commission.
[Order 395, 49 FR 35356, Sept. 7, 1984] Editorial Note
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations affecting § 381.302, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*
# C_2013038EN.01002903.xml

| 9.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/29

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 11 December 2012 — Trentea v FRA

(Case F-112/10) (1)

1

(Civil service - FRA staff - Members of the temporary staff - Recruitment - Vacancy notice - Rejection of an application)

2013/C 38/55

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Cornelia Trentea (Vienna, Austria) (represented by L. Levi and M. Vandenbussche, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) (represented by M. Kjærum, acting as Agent, assisted by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Civil service — First, the claim for annulment of the defendant’s decisions rejecting the applicant’s application for the post of administrative assistant in the field of Finance and Procurement and appointing another candidate to that post. Secondly, the claim for compensation in respect of the material and non-material damage suffered by the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Declares that Ms Trentea must bear her own costs and orders her to pay the costs incurred by the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Declares that Ms Trentea must bear her own costs and orders her to pay the costs incurred by the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights.

---

(1)  OJ C 13, 15.1.2011, p. 43.

1

---
**COURT OF APPEALS**

**TENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS**

****

April 23, 2015

No. 10-15-00137-CR

OVIDIU TUNAS

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

From the 54th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-18-C2

**JUDGMENT**

	This appeal has been considered by the Court.  Because the Court finds that it does not have jurisdiction of the appeal, it is the judgment of this Court that the appeal is dismissed.  

	A copy of this judgment will be certified by the Clerk of this Court and delivered to the trial court clerk for enforcement.

							PER CURIAM

****SHARRI ROESSLER, CLERK

						By: 

							Deputy Clerk

# image1.png

# image2.jpeg

# image3.png
### §1a–13. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, Pub. L. 101–628, title XII, §1217, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4508, related to proposals for boundary changes. See section 100506(b) of Title 54, National Park Service and Related Programs.
### §78c–1. Swap agreements

#### (a) [Reserved]

#### (b) Security-based swap agreements

(1) The definition of "security" in section 78c(a)(10) of this title does not include any security-based swap agreement.

(2) The Commission is prohibited from registering, or requiring, recommending, or suggesting, the registration under this chapter of any security-based swap agreement. If the Commission becomes aware that a registrant has filed a registration application with respect to such a swap agreement, the Commission shall promptly so notify the registrant. Any such registration with respect to such a swap agreement shall be void and of no force or effect.

(3) Except as provided in section 78p(a) of this title with respect to reporting requirements, the Commission is prohibited from—

(A) promulgating, interpreting, or enforcing rules; or

(B) issuing orders of general applicability;

under this chapter in a manner that imposes or specifies reporting or recordkeeping requirements, procedures, or standards as prophylactic measures against fraud, manipulation, or insider trading with respect to any security-based swap agreement.

(4) References in this chapter to the "purchase" or "sale" of a security-based swap agreement shall be deemed to mean the execution, termination (prior to its scheduled maturity date), assignment, exchange, or similar transfer or conveyance of, or extinguishing of rights or obligations under, a security-based swap agreement, as the context may require.

(June 6, 1934, ch. 404, title I, §3A, as added Pub. L. 106–554, §1(a)(5) [title III, §303(a)], Dec. 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A–452; amended Pub. L. 111–203, title VII, §762(d)(1), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 1760.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (b)(2) to (4), was in the original "this title". See References in Text note set out under section 78a of this title.

#### Amendments

2010—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 111–203, §762(d)(1)(A), struck out subsec. (a) and reserved that subsec. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "The definition of 'security' in section 78c(a)(10) of this title does not include any non-security-based swap agreement (as defined in section 206C of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act)."

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 111–203, §762(d)(1)(B), struck out "(as defined in section 206B of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act)" after "security-based swap agreement" wherever appearing.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2010 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 111–203 effective on the later of 360 days after July 21, 2010, or, to the extent a provision of subtitle B (§§761–774) of title VII of Pub. L. 111–203 requires a rulemaking, not less than 60 days after publication of the final rule or regulation implementing such provision of subtitle B, see section 774 of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as a note under section 77b of this title.
### §194. Lands held in private, municipal, or State ownership not affected

No lands located within the park boundaries held in private, municipal, or State ownership on January 26, 1915, shall be affected by or subject to the provisions of sections 191, 193, 195, and 195a of this title.

(Jan. 26, 1915, ch. 19, §3, 38 Stat. 800.)
HomeLatest FilingsPrevious Page

    - SEC Home  »
    - Search the Next-Generation EDGAR System  »
    - Company Search  »
    - Current Page

225 LIBERTY STREET, 35TH FLOORNEW YORK NY 10281         

225 LIBERTY STREET, 35TH FLOORNEW YORK NY 10281         212-417-7000

Brookfield Infrastructure Income Fund Inc. CIK#: 0001955857 (see all company filings)
State location: NY | Fiscal Year End: 1231formerly: Brookfield Infrastructure Income Fund, Inc. (filings through 2023-06-12)Get **insider transactions** for this **issuer**.File Number: **812-15426**

||
||
Exhibit 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Luna Gold Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Tim Searcy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 14th day of November, 2005.

 

 

 
 

/s/  Tim SearcyPrincipal Executive Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  For Partners 
-  Lenders 
-  CDC/504 Loan Program 
-  504 Secondary Market 

## Section navigation

-  Lenders    -  7(a) loan program 
  -  CDC/504 loan program      -  Operate as a CDC 
    -  Secondary market 
    -  Rural Initiative pilot program 
  -  Microloan program 
  -  Become an SBA lender 
  -  Lender reports 
  -  Training on demand 
-  Counselors 
-  SBICs 
-  Surety bond partners and agents 
-  Contracting officials 

# 504 secondary market

----

## Content

----

The Small Business Administration guarantees debentures issued by CDCs.  SBA debentures are securitized into Debenture Pools which are sold to investors as Development Company Participation Certificates (DCPCs). SBA guarantees the full faith and credit and timely payment on these certificates.

## Debenture funding schedule

View SBA's Information Notice regarding the Debenture Funding Schedule for 504 Loans - Calendar Year 2022. The schedule dates include the sale of both 10- and 20-year debentures.

## Fiscal and Selling Agent (FSA)

Eagle Compliance, LLC serves as FSA for SBA’s CDC/504 loan program. As FSA, Eagle provides services and administrative support to SBA and CDCs related to the sale of 504 debentures and debenture pool certificates.

##  SBA lenders finance small businesses

          Become a lender
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-20204

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CARLOS ALBERTO MONTELONGO-PUENTE,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:17-CR-493-1

Before BENAVIDES, HAYNES, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Carlos Alberto Montelongo-Puente pleaded guilty to being found 

unlawfully present in the United States following a deportation that was 

subsequent to a conviction for an aggravated felony. The district court used 

the 2014 Sentencing Guidelines to calculate the applicable guidelines 

sentencing range and sentenced him within that range to 57 months of 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 7, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-20204 Document: 00514863405 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/07/2019
No. 18-20204

2

imprisonment to be followed by three years of supervised release. This appeal 

timely followed.

At issue here is the application of a 16-level increase to MontelongoPuente’s offense level pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) based on the 

determination that his prior Texas conviction for aggravated robbery is a crime 

of violence for purposes of that Guideline. Montelongo-Puente acknowledges 

our previous holding in United States v. Santiesteban-Hernandez, 469 F.3d 

376, 380-81 (5th Cir. 2006), abrogated on other grounds by United States v. 

Rodriguez, 711 F.3d 541 (5th Cir. 2013) (en banc), that Texas robbery falls 

within the generic definition of robbery and thus qualifies as the enumerated 

offense of robbery for purposes of § 2L1.2’s 16-level enhancement. He argues, 

though, that the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, in Howard v. State, 333 

S.W.3d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011), has since interpreted the Texas offense of 

robbery so broadly that it no longer fits the generic definition of robbery. We 

have recently rejected this argument and reaffirmed the holding of 

Santiesteban-Hernandez. See United States v. Nunez-Medrano, 751 F. App’x 

494, 498–500 (5th Cir. 2018). While Nunez-Medrano is not binding, it is 

persuasive. See 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4; Ballard v. Burton, 444 F.3d 391, 401 & n.7.

Because the Texas offense of aggravated robbery qualifies as generic 

robbery, the district court did not err in applying § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)’s 16-level 

enhancement here. In light of this conclusion, we need not address 

Montelongo-Puente’s argument that Texas aggravated robbery does qualify for 

the enhancement because it does not have as an element the use, attempted 

use, or threatened use of physical force against the person of another.

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 18-20204 Document: 00514863405 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/07/2019
### §1607. National Forest System renewable resources; development and administration by Secretary in accordance with multiple use and sustained yield concepts for products and services; target year for operational posture of resources; budget requests

The Secretary shall take such action as will assure that the development and administration of the renewable resources of the National Forest System are in full accord with the concepts for multiple use and sustained yield of products and services as set forth in the Multiple-Use Sustained-Yield Act of 1960 [16 U.S.C. 528–531]. To further these concepts, the Congress hereby sets the year 2030 as the target year when the renewable resources of the National Forest System shall be in an operating posture whereby all backlogs of needed treatment for their restoration shall be reduced to a current basis and the major portion of planned intensive multiple-use sustained-yield management procedures shall be installed and operating on an environmentally-sound basis. The annual budget shall contain requests for funds for an orderly program to eliminate such backlogs: Provided, That when the Secretary finds that (1) the backlog of areas that will benefit by such treatment has been eliminated, (2) the cost of treating the remainder of such area exceeds the economic and environmental benefits to be secured from their treatment, or (3) the total supplies of the renewable resources of the United States are adequate to meet the future needs of the American people, the budget request for these elements of restoration may be adjusted accordingly.

(Pub. L. 93–378, §9, formerly §8, Aug. 17, 1974, 88 Stat. 479, renumbered §9, Pub. L. 94–588, §2, Oct. 22, 1976, 90 Stat. 2949; amended Pub. L. 115–141, div. O, title II, §208(b)(2), Mar. 23, 2018, 132 Stat. 1066; Pub. L. 117–58, div. G, title III, §70302(a)(2), Nov. 15, 2021, 135 Stat. 1260.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Multiple-Use Sustained-Yield Act of 1960, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 86–517, June 12, 1960, 74 Stat. 215, which is classified generally to sections 528 to 531 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 528 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 117–58 substituted "year 2030" for "year 2000".

2018—Pub. L. 115–141 substituted "Secretary shall take" for "Secretary of Agriculture shall take".

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of certain enforcement functions of Secretary or other official in Department of Agriculture under this subchapter to Federal Inspector, Office of Federal Inspector for Alaska Natural Gas Transportation System, and subsequent transfer to Secretary of Energy, then to Federal Coordinator for Alaska Natural Gas Transportation Projects, see note set out under section 1601 of this title.
## Breadcrumb

-  Inicio 
-  Centro de Capacitación de La SBA 
-  Invirtiendo En Estados Unidos 
-  La Contratación y Subcontratación Federal 

# La contratación y subcontratación federal

Las oportunidades en la contratación y subcontratación federal en diferentes industrias podrían ser relevantes para su pequeña empresa. Elija un tema para aprender más.

-  La contratación y subcontratación de infraestructuras generales              Aprenda a aprovechar las oportunidades de contratación federal y estatal que ofrece la Ley Bipartidista de Infraestructura (BIL, por sus siglas en inglés).                  Infórmese sobre las oportunidades de contratación bajo BIL 
-  Oportunidades de contratación de en la internet de alta velocidad              Infórmese sobre los contratos para empresas que pueden ayudar a implementar e instalar infraestructuras de Internet de alta velocidad.                  Infórmese sobre las oportunidades de contratación a través del BEAD 
-  La contratación con el Departamento de Transporte              Infórmese sobre los contratos para empresas que pueden ayudar a reconstruir nuestras infraestructuras de transporte.                  Infórmese sobre los contratos con el Departamento de Transporte