alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The data reported in this exhibit are based on unaudited statements but include
all adjustments which the company considers necessary for a fair presentation of
results for this period.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000041499
<NAME> THE GILLETTE COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          80,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,507,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    74,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,621,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,132,000
<PP&E>                                       5,962,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,295,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,786,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,180,000
<BONDS>                                      2,931,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     85,000
<COMMON>                                     1,364,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,611,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,786,000
<SALES>                                      9,897,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,897,000
<CGS>                                        3,711,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,711,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,081,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             136,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,930,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   670,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,260,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,260,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.14


</TABLE>
### §157b. Additional lands within park boundaries

Notwithstanding any other provisions of law, the Secretary of the Interior is authorized to procure, in such manner as he may consider to be in the public interest, the remaining non-Federal land and interests in land within the boundaries of Big Bend National Park.

(Aug. 8, 1953, ch. 385, 67 Stat. 497.)
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT HAVE 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section
1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of GIANT GROUP, LTD. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2003 (Form 10-K) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/    PASQUALE A. AMBROGIOPasquale A. Ambrogio Chief Executive OfficerMarch 29, 2004




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
ExpressJet Airl ines, Inc.

17445 JFK Boulevard Houston, TX 77032

June 29 th , 2011

U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Operations, M-30 West Building ground floor,

Room W12-140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE. Washington, DC 20590

Dear Sir or Madam:

I am petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (F AA) on behalf of ExpressJet Airlines, Inc. d.b.a. Continental Express/United Expres s, for an extension of Exempti on No. 6798, as amended. This exemption from § 121.434(c)(1)(ii) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows the carrier to substitute a qualified and authorized check airman or aircrew program designee for an FAA inspector to observe a qualifying pilot in command who is completing initial or upgrade training specified in § 121.424 during at least one flight leg that includes a takeoff and a landing.

There have been no changes in the conditions and reason s relative to public interest and safety that were the basis of granting this exemption.

Thank you in advance for your consideration of th is request; we look forward to your response.

Respectfully,

Greg Wooley Sr. Director of Flight Standards and Training ExpressJet Airlines, Inc.

lc cc: Federal Aviation Administration, Air Transportation Division, AFS-200
SBIRT IOWA

The Iowa Department of Public Health (IDPH) received a five-year SAMHSA cooperative agreement in 2012 to implement SBIRT within community health centers and the Iowa National Guard (IANG).   SBIRT IOWA is currently a joint partnership between local substance abuse agencies and Federally Qualified Community Health Centers (FQHC’s) in Polk, Woodbury, Blackhawk and Scott counties and at Camp Dodge, home to Iowa’s National Guard.    Iowa SBIRT services uses a public health approach to implement and support clinically appropriate, evidence based practices to promote substance use screening and intervention within primary care and community based settings and promotes integration of ‘routine’ screenings and interventions within medical settings, and the Iowa National Guard,  to ensure a more coordinated and comprehensive approach to chronic disease management.  The SBIRT Iowa model uses a co-location model and involves co-locating a provider from a publically funded substance abuse center within the medical center or National Guard to fully integrate substance abuse specialty care.

Strongly committed to supporting the health and behavioral health of service members from Iowa, IDPH partnered with the Iowa National Guard to provide SAMHSA SBIRT services.  IDPH funds two contracted agencies to provide two full time clinicians to conduct SBIRT services within the IANG.  The two embedded clinicians provide SBIRT services at Camp Dodge and integrate SBIRT into the annual and mandatory Periodic Health Assessments and conduct SBIRT when soldiers voluntarily self-refer or in response to command referrals. 

For more information regarding SBIRT IOWA, please contact Michele Tilotta, SBIRT IOWA project director at Michele.tilotta@idph.iowa.gov or visit the SBIRT IOWA website at:  https://www.idph.state.ia.us/sbirt/Tools.aspx
#### § 31.203 Open meetings and public access to records.

The State advisory group established pursuant to section 223(a)(3) will follow applicable State open meeting and public access laws and regulations in the conduct of meetings and the maintenance of records relating to their functions.
### §35. Recovery of damages, etc., for antitrust violations from any local government, or official or employee thereof acting in an official capacity

#### (a) Prohibition in general

No damages, interest on damages, costs, or attorney's fees may be recovered under section 4, 4A, or 4C of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. 15, 15a, or 15c) from any local government, or official or employee thereof acting in an official capacity.

#### (b) Preconditions for attachment of prohibition; prima facie evidence for nonapplication of prohibition

Subsection (a) shall not apply to cases commenced before the effective date of this Act unless the defendant establishes and the court determines, in light of all the circumstances, including the stage of litigation and the availability of alternative relief under the Clayton Act, that it would be inequitable not to apply this subsection to a pending case. In consideration of this section, existence of a jury verdict, district court judgment, or any stage of litigation subsequent thereto, shall be deemed to be prima facie evidence that subsection (a) shall not apply.

(Pub. L. 98–544, §3, Oct. 24, 1984, 98 Stat. 2750.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

For the effective date of this Act, referred to in subsec. (b), see Effective Date note below.

The Clayton Act, referred to in subsecs. (a) and (b), is act Oct. 15, 1914, ch. 323, 38 Stat. 730, which is classified generally to sections 12, 13, 14 to 19, 21, and 22 to 27 of this title and to sections 52 and 53 of Title 29, Labor. For further details and complete classification of this Act to the Code, see References in Text note set out under section 12 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective thirty days before Oct. 24, 1984, see section 6 of Pub. L. 98–544, set out as a note under section 34 of this title.
### §80b–21. Effective date

This subchapter shall become effective on November 1, 1940.

(Aug. 22, 1940, ch. 686, title II, §221, 54 Stat. 857.)
Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

777 Old Saw Mill River Road

Tarrytown, New York 10591

Fax: (914) 789-2817

(914) 789-2800

www.progenics.com  Tarrytown, N.Y., April 8, 2015 – Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc., (Nasdaq: PGNX), an oncology company developing innovative ways to target and treat prostate cancer, announced today that Mark R. Baker, CEO, is scheduled to present at the 14th Annual Needham Healthcare Conference on Wednesday, April 15, 2015, at 2:20 p.m. Eastern Time. The conference is being held at The Westin Grand Central Hotel.
 
 www.progenics.com
 
  
 TM ® www.progenics.com
  www.progenics.com ®
 
 
 Editor's Note
 
 www.relistor.com
 
 Contact:
Melissa DownsInvestor Relations(914) 789-2801mdowns@progenics.com
EXHIBIT 99(c)


                    Exhibit 99(c) - Report of Audit Committee

                       GREAT NORTHERN IRON ORE PROPERTIES
                            Report of Audit Committee
                          Year ended December 31, 2002

The Audit Committee oversees the Trust's financial reporting process on behalf
of the Board of Trustees. Management has the primary responsibility for the
financial statements and the reporting process including the systems of internal
controls. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee
reviewed the audited financial statements in the Annual Report to Certificate
Holders with management including a discussion of the quality, not just the
acceptability, of the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant
judgments and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements.

The Audit Committee reviewed with the independent auditors, who are responsible
for expressing an opinion on the conformity of those audited financial
statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States,
their judgments as to the quality, not just the acceptability, of the Trust's
accounting principles and such other matters as are required to be discussed
with the Audit Committee under auditing standards generally accepted in the
United States. In addition, the Audit Committee has discussed with the
independent auditors the auditors' independence from management and the Trust
including the matters in the written disclosures required by the Independence
Standards Board.

The Audit Committee discussed with the Trust's independent auditors the overall
scope and plans for their audit. The Audit Committee met with the independent
auditors, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their
examination, their evaluation of the Trust's internal controls and the overall
quality of the Trust's financial reporting.

The Board of Trustees accepted the Audit Committee's reappointment of Ernst &
Young LLP as independent auditors to the financial statements of the Trust for
the current fiscal year. Fees for the last annual audit were $40,500 and all
other fees are estimated to be $3,310.

In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit
Committee recommended to the Board of Trustees that the audited financial
statements be included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2002 for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


<PAGE>


              Exhibit 99(c) - Report of Audit Committee (continued)


Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Robert A. Stein
------------------------
Audit Committee Chairman

/s/ Roger W. Staehle
------------------------
Audit Committee Member

/s/ John H. Roe, III
------------------------
Audit Committee Member                                  Dated: February 14, 2003
§ 401.4 Project applications and proposed revisions and changes. ( a ) Applications for inclusion of new public projects and the deletion or alteration of previously included public projects may be submitted by signatory parties and agencies or political subdivisions thereof. Owners or sponsors of privately owned projects may submit applications for the inclusion of new private projects and the deletion or alteration of previously included private projects in which the applicant has an interest. The Commission may also receive and consider proposals for changes and additions to the Comprehensive Plan which may be submitted by any agency of the signatory parties, or any interested person, organization, or group. Any application or proposal shall be submitted in such form as may be required by the Executive Director to facilitate consideration by the Commission.
( b ) Applications for projects shall include at least the following information: ( 1 ) Purpose or purposes, including quantitative measures of physical benefit anticipated from the proposal;
( 2 ) The location, physical features and total area required.
( 3 ) Forecast of the cost or effect on the utilization of water resources;
( 4 ) Relation to other parts of the existing Comprehensive Plan;
( 5 ) A discussion of conformance with Commission policies included in the Comprehensive Plan; and
( 6 ) A discussion of the alternatives considered.
EXHIBIT 10(d)
<PAGE>

                                                                    MLA No. 076A

                                   AMENDMENT

     THIS AMENDMENT is entered into as of November 19, 2001, between COBANK, ACB
("CoBank") and TELMARK LLC, (the "Company").

                                   BACKGROUND

     CoBank and the Company are parties to an Amended and  Restated  Master Loan
Agreement  dated March 14,  2001 (such  agreement,  as  previously  amended,  is
hereinafter  referred  to as the  "MLA").  CoBank and the  Company now desire to
amend the MLA. For that reason, and for valuable  consideration (the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby  acknowledged),  CoBank and the Company agree as
follows:

1.   Section 10(C) of the MLA is hereby amended and restated to read as follows:

     (C) TANGIBLE NET WORTH. The Company will at all times maintain Tangible Net
Worth (as determined in accordance with GAAP consistently  applied) in an amount
not less than $100,000,000 for each fiscal year ending after June 30, 2001.

2.   Section 11(J) is hereby added to the MLA to read as follows:

     (J) CHANGE IN CONTROL. If there shall at any time be a Change in Control of
the  Borrower.  As used  herein,  "Change in Control"  means,  at any time,  the
failure of Agway, Inc. to beneficially own, directly or indirectly  (through one
or more of its wholly-owned  Subsidiaries),  at least fifty-one percent (51%) of
the  membership  interests of the  Borrower,  or,  regardless  of its  ownership
interest,   Agway's   relinquishment   (whether   voluntary  or  involuntary  or
involuntary)  of the right to elect or cause the election of at least  fifty-one
percent  (51%)  of the  members  of the  Board  of  Directors  of the  Borrower.
Notwithstanding  the foregoing,  CoBank acknowledges that Agway Inc. has pledged
its equity interest in Telmark as additional  collateral under a secured line of
credit,  and  CoBank  agrees  that  such  pledge,  in and of  itself,  shall not
constitute a Change of Control for purposes of this Agreement.

     Except as set forth in this  amendment,  the MLA,  including all amendments
thereto, shall continue in full force and effect as written.

     IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the parties have caused this amendment to be executed
by their duly authorized officers as of the date shown above.

COBANK, ACB                            TELMARK LLC

By: /s/Ralph Lawrence                  By: /s/Jennifer L. Hicks
    ---------------------------------      -------------------------------------
    Ralph Lawrence                         Jennifer L. Hicks
    Vice President                         Chief Financial Officer
                                           Treasurer
<PAGE>
Exhibit




AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE 
TO THE 
ORBITAL SCIENCES CORPORATION NONQUALIFIED MANAGEMENT 
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN






Pursuant to the powers of amendment reserved in Section 10.05 of the Orbital Sciences Corporation Nonqualified Management Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2005 (the “Plan”), the Plan is amended as set forth herein. This amendment shall supersede the provisions of the Plan document to the extent those provisions are inconsistent with the provisions of this amendment. 


1.


Section 2.01 of the Plan is amended by deleting the number "$125,000" in the sole sentence thereof and by replacing it with the number "$150,000."


2.


This Amendment Number One shall be effective for all Plan Years, as that term is defined in the Plan, commencing on and after January 1, 2011.
### §78nn. Tennessee Valley Authority

#### (a) In general

Commencing with the issuance by the Tennessee Valley Authority of an annual report on Commission Form 10–K (or any successor thereto) for fiscal year 2006 and thereafter, the Tennessee Valley Authority shall file with the Commission, in accordance with such rules and regulations as the Commission has prescribed or may prescribe, such periodic, current, and supplementary information, documents, and reports as would be required pursuant to section 78m of this title if the Tennessee Valley Authority were an issuer of a security registered pursuant to section 78l of this title. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, the Tennessee Valley Authority shall not be required to register any securities under this chapter, and shall not be deemed to have registered any securities under this chapter.

#### (b) Limited treatment as issuer

Commencing with the issuance by the Tennessee Valley Authority of an annual report on Commission Form 10–K (or any successor thereto) for fiscal year 2006 and thereafter, the Tennessee Valley Authority shall be deemed to be an issuer for purposes of section 78j–1 of this title, other than for subsection (m)(1) or (m)(3) of section 78j–1 of this title. The Tennessee Valley Authority shall not be required by this subsection to comply with the rules issued by any national securities exchange or national securities association in response to rules issued by the Commission pursuant to section 78j–1(m)(1) of this title.

#### (c) No effect on TVA authority

Nothing in this section shall be construed to diminish, impair, or otherwise affect the authority of the Board of Directors of the Tennessee Valley Authority to carry out its statutory functions under the Tennessee Valley Authority Act of 1933 [16 U.S.C. 831 et seq.].

(June 6, 1934, ch. 404, title I, §37, as added Pub. L. 108–447, div. H, title V, §520(2), Dec. 8, 2004, 118 Stat. 3267.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (a), was in the original "this title". See References in Text note set out under section 78a of this title and Codification note below.

The Tennessee Valley Authority Act of 1933, referred to in subsec. (c), is act May 18, 1933, ch. 32, 48 Stat. 58, which is classified generally to chapter 12A (§831 et seq.) of Title 16, Conservation. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 831 of Title 16 and Tables.

#### Codification

Pub. L. 108–447, which directed amendment of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by adding this section at the end, is reflected in the source credit above as adding this section to title I of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.
#### TROGDON v. TROGDON

No. 105P90

Case below: 97 N.C.App. 330

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 5 April 1990.
Big Be lt Mou ntain

Elk Park 

W

hitetai

l Basin 

Range 9 W. Range 7 W. Range 5 W. Range 3 W. 

Holter Dam Lower Holter Lake/ 

Missouri River SRMA 

Township Lincoln 

14 N. Log Gulch 

Departure Point 

Range 1 W. 

Sleeping Giant/ Missouri River SRMA 

Helena 

National Forest 

Lewis & Clark 

County 

Range 1 E. 

Township 

12 N. Township 

12 N. 

Marysville Hauser Lake SRMA 

White Sandy 

Helena 

National Forest 

Scratchgravel
 

Hills SRMA
 

French Bar 

Spokane 

Bay 

Township 

10 N.
 

Helena 

Sheep Mountain 

SRMA Uppermost Mi

River SRMA 

Township 

8 N. 

Helena 

National Forest 

Range 7 W. 

Elkhorn 

Mountains 

Limestone Townsend 

Jefferson Hills 

Range 11 W. Range 9 W. Township 6 N. County 

Range 13 W. Boulder 

Beaverhead/Deerlodge Radersburg 

National Forest 

Anaconda 

Township 

4 N. 

Deerlodge
 

County
 

Uppermost Missouri 

River SRMA 

Mount Haggin 
 

Wildlife 
 

Management Area 

Butte 

Beaverhead/Deerlodge 

National Forest 

Silver Bow 

County 

Pipestone SRMA 

Whitehall 

Three Forks 

Upper Big Hole River SRMA 

Beaverhead/Deerlodge 

Range 3 W. 

National Forest 

Range 11 W. Humbug Spires SRMA 

Divide Bridge 

Divide Campground 

Range 7 W. Range 5 W. 

Range 1 W. 

Township 

2 S.