alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §690m. Miscellaneous

To the extent such procedures are not inconsistent with the requirements of this part, the Administrator may take such action as set forth in sections 687a, 687c, 687d, and 687f of this title and an officer, director, employee, agent, or other participant in the management or conduct of the affairs of a Renewable Fuel Capital Investment company shall be subject to the requirements of such sections.

(Pub. L. 85–699, title III, §394, as added Pub. L. 110–140, title XII, §1207, Dec. 19, 2007, 121 Stat. 1783.)
## UNSCA NNA BLE ITEMS NOT INCLUDED IN THE

AI RWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (A D) DMS DOCKET

DMS Docket Number: FAA - 20 07 - 00 37 Directorate Identifier: 20 07 - NE - 41 - AD Name/ Description of Unscannable Item Rolls - Royce Deutschland Alert Service Bulletin TAY - 72 - A1524, Revisi on 1, dated September 1, 2006

________________________________________________________________ SERVICE INFORMATION MA Y BE EXA MINED AT: National A rchiv es and Records A dministration (NA RA ). For information on the availability of this material at NA RA , cal l 202 741 6030; or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal - register/cfr/ibr - locations.html or Federal A

viation Ad ministration New England Region Office of the Regional Counse l 12 New England Executive Park Burlington, MA

01803 by appointment, between 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday , except Federal holidays
Exhibit 20.2
                                                                 ------------ 

Chase Manhattan Bank Grantor Trust 1996-A

From: The Chase Manhattan Bank

To:   Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.


                   MONTHLY CERTIFICATEHOLDER'S REPORT
                   ----------------------------------

Due Period 13 Beginning Date                     02/01/1997
Due Period 13 End Date                           02/28/1997
Determination Date                               03/10/1997
Remittance Date                                  03/17/1997


I.    Monthly Principal and Principal Carryover Shortfall to Certificateholders
      (Per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                  $ 25.4710346741

II.   Monthly Interest and Unpaid Interest to Certificateholders
      (Per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                   $ 2.7560481295

III.  Monthly Expenses Summary

      A. Servicing Fee Disbursement                                $ 781,373.44
      B. Cash Collateral Account Expense                                 $ 0.00
      C. Total Expenses paid
         (per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                $ 0.5300092554

IV.   Cash Collateral Account Deposit Amount                             $ 0.00

V.    Outstanding Advance Summary

      A. From Prior Period                                       $ 3,538,567.20
      B. From Current Period                                     $ 3,808,278.61
      C. Change in Amount Between Periods (Lines B - A)            $ 269,711.41

VI.   Pool Factor Information

      A. Certificate Principal Balance                         $ 900,097,104.51
      B. Initial Certificate Balance                         $ 1,474,263,764.33
      C. Pool Factor (Lines A / B)                               0.610540071789

VII.  Available Cash Collateral Account Information for Due Period

      A. Available Cash Collateral Amount                       $ 46,882,406.40
      B. Available Cash Collateral Amount Percentage            5.000000000160%

VIII. Required Cash Collateral Amount

      A. For the Current Collection Period                      $ 46,882,406.40
      B. For the Next Collection Period                         $ 45,004,855.23
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 83 (Thursday, April 30, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 24311]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-10138]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 9115]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Frances Stark: Intimism'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Frances Stark: Intimism,'' imported from 
abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of 
cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Art Institute 
of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, from on or about May 21, 2015, until on 
or about August 30, 2015, and at possible additional exhibitions or 
venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have 
ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact the Office of Public Diplomacy and 
Public Affairs in the Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of 
State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email: section2459@state.gov). The 
mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, SA-5, Suite 5H03, 
Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: April 20, 2015.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2015-10138 Filed 4-29-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Fumai, Appellant.

[828 NYS2d 79]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Donnino, J.), rendered May 2, 2005, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the sentence imposed thereon; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for resentencing in accordance herewith.

Prior to the entry of the defendant’s plea of guilty, the County Court, Nassau County (Calabrese, J.) adjudicated him a second felony offender predicated upon a prior drug conviction in the state of Connecticut. Contrary to the People’s contention, the defendant’s fully preserved challenge to that adjudication *(see People v Samms,*95 NY2d 52, 57 [2000]) was not forfeited by his subsequent guilty plea and is properly before us *(see People v Thompson,*60 NY2d 513, 520 [1983]; *see also People v Thomas,*53 NY2d 338 [1981]; *cf. People v Ladson,*30 AD3d 836 [2006]; *832
      *People v Maglione,*305 AD2d 426 [2003]; *People v Pabon,*224 AD2d 721, 721-722 [1996]).

The People failed to establish the requisite equivalence between Connecticut General Statutes § 21a-277 (a) and Penal Law § 70.06 (1) *(see*CPL 400.21 [7] [a], [c]; Penal Law § 70.06 [1] [b]; *People v Maglione, supra).*Because the Connecticut statute covers a variety of acts not all of which are felonies in New York, the People were obligated to prove that the charges of which the defendant was actually convicted in Connecticut alleged acts that would constitute a felony in this state *(see People v Muniz,*74 NY2d 464, 467-468 [1989]; *People ex rel. Goldman v Denno,*9 NY2d 138 [1961]; *People v Sair,*173 AD2d 578, 579 [1991]). In this case, the prior Connecticut conviction was for “possession of narcotics [with] intent to sell.” The People failed, however, to present any evidence as to which “narcotic substance,” as that term is defined under Connecticut General Statutes § 2la-240 (9), (30), § 21a-243 and the regulations adopted thereunder, was at issue in the Connecticut case, thereby precluding a determination that such substance also fell within New York’s different, and somewhat more restrictive, definition of a “narcotic drug” *(see*Penal Law § 220.00 [7]; Public Health Law § 3306, schedule I [b], [c]; schedule II [b], [c]).

Accordingly, we modify the judgment by vacating the sentence imposed. The matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, so that the defendant may be resentenced as a first-time felony offender. Florio, J.P, Skelos, Fisher and Dillon, JJ., concur.
Date: February 25, 2015

Meeting: Meeting with represen tatives from Western utilities, states, and

nongovernmental organizations sponsored by the Center for the New

Energy Economy.

Rule(s) Discussed: CPP

Written Material: No

Organization Name

Arizona Public Service C harles Spell

Basin Electric Power Cooperative Lyle Witham

Black Hills Energy Fred Carl

EPA Headquarters J oe Goffman

EPA Region 8 Callie Videtich

EPA Region 9 Deborah Jordan

EPA Region 10 Kate Kelly

NorthWestern Energy William Thompson

NV Energy Starla Lacy

PacifiCorp Cathy Woollums

Pacific Gas & Electric John Busterud

Portland General Electric Sunny Radcliffe

Public Service Co. of NM Jeanette Pablo

Salt River Project Kara Montalvo

Tri

- State G&T Barbara Walz

Tucson Electric Power Erik Bakken

West Associates Reuben Plantico

Xcel Energy Frank Prager

Center for the New Energy Economy Governor Bill Ritter

Center for the New Energy Economy Patrick Cummins

Center for the New Energy Economy Dennis ArfmannOrganization Name

Center for the New Energy Economy James Tarpey

Center for the New Energy Economy Tom Plant

Center for the New Energy Economy Jeff Lyng
FROM: THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON,

#### STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff, vs. LARRY L. HERRICK, Defendant.

NO. 1236 DECISION

DATED this 8th day of March, 1990.

On March 15,1989, the Defendant was sentenced to eight (8) years for Theft, ineligible for parole until defendant has participated and completed the programs for drug and alcohol abuse at Montana State Prison; 198 days credit; dangerous offender.

On March 8, 1990, the Defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.

The Defendant was present and was represented by Morgan Queal, of the Montana Defender Project. The state was not represented.

Before hearing the application, the Defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also to increase it if such is possible. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.

After careful consideration, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence is affirmed as imposed.

The reason for the decision is based on Rule 17 of the Sentence Review Division Rules and the presumption that the sentence as imposed is correct.

The sentencing judge clearly pointed out in his sentence that the records of the two co-conspirators were substantially different.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 53 (Friday, March 18, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14996-14997]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6397]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Committee for Mathematical and Physical Sciences; Notice 
of Meeting

    In accordance with Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 
as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following 
meeting:

    Name: Mathematical and Physical Sciences Advisory Committee 
(<greek-i>66).
    Date/Time: April 7, 2010 8 a.m.-6 p.m., April 8, 2010 8 a.m.-3 
p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, Room 1235, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Dr. Morris L. Aizenman, Senior Science 
Associate, Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Room 
1005, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, 
VA 22230. (703) 292-8807.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning NSF science and education activities within the 
Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences.
    Agenda:

Update on current status of Directorate
Report of MPS Committee of Visitors
Report of NSF Advisory Working Groups
Meeting of MPSAC with Divisions within MPS Directorate
Discussion of MPS Long-term Planning Activities

    Summary Minutes: May be obtained from the contact person listed 
above.


[[Page 14997]]


    Dated: March 15, 2011.
Susanne E. Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-6397 Filed 3-17-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Grafe , Jerom e (DEP ) From : Sent : To : Subject : Mar y Elle n Welch [maryellen225@yahoo.com ] Thursday , Septembe r20 , 201 2 3:3 0 P M Grafe , Jerom e (DEP ) Re d Blu e Lin e Connecto r Dea r Jerome , Becaus e I a ms o ba d a t th e compute

r I a mwritin g to yo u onc

e again . I thin k

I go t you r compute r addres s wrong o n th e firs t letter.S o I wil l try on

e mor e tim e !Hopefull y thi s on e wil l reac

h yo u fo r th e record . M y reques

t i s tha t th e D.E.P . suppor

t th e desig n an d constructio n o f

th e Red

- Blu e Connector.Ove r man y year s I hav e worke d to se

e th e mitigatio n proposa

l fo r th e Bi g Di g becom

e areality . Wa

y bac k whe n th e Bi g Di g wa s stil l i n th

e desig n stag e man y communit

y activist s wer

e involve di n th

e proces s o f

makin g sur

e tha t an y advers e impacts fro mth

e Bi g Di g wer

e mitigate d i n apackag

e tha t wa s mandate d a s par t o f th e projec t approval . W

e worke d wit h th

e stat e officials,th e politicians,th e C.L. F an d al l othe r interested partie s t

o mak e sur e thi s wa s par t o f th e proposal . Severa l time s w e ha d to spea k u p an d defend th

e mitigatio n whe

n som e peopl e trie d t o ge t ri do f i t o r dismantle it . Som

e didn' t wan t anothe r constructio n projec t

happenin g on tha t sid e o f Beaco n Hill . Som

e though t i t wa s superfluou s an

d not ameaningfu l measure . O f course som

e though t i t wa s to o costly.Howeve

r th e advantages o f

thi s connecto

r ar e wel l wort

h th e expens e Fo r thos e o f u s who liv e i n Eas

t Boston an

d o n th e North Shor

e thi s connection wil l b

e ahug e hel p t o acces s th e hospital s lik e M.G.H . Anothe r positiv e i s tha

t peopl e fro mthi s sid

e o f th e worl dwil l b

e bette r abl e t o ge t t o wor k o r ge t ajo b i n th

e Cambridge an

d us e simple mass transit

to ge t there . A reall y bi g advantag

e i s tha t travelers t

o an d fro mth e airpor t wil l hav e adirec t connection t

o th e Loga n withou t changing a

e Par k Street . Thi s i s especiall

y helpfu l whe

n th e passenge

r ha s luggage.I

n addition , thi s transi t wil l reduc

e pollutio n an

d traffi c i n an

d aroun d Eas t Boston . An dth

e Por t Authority won' t

hav e t o provid e parkin g fo r

thi s segmen

t o f th e passengers . So , thi s i s m

y lon g winde d effor t

t o urg e th e Stat e to desig n an d construc

t thi s good project . Th

e expens e wil l b e wel l wort

h i t i n terms o f

abette r environment . Sincerely , Mar y Elle n Welch , Eas

t Boston

l
#   2021-2022 NSDUH: Other Sources of State-Level Data

Compare state-level National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) estimates with those from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Comparisons are available for alcohol and cigarette use among people ages 18 or older.

National Survey on Drug Use and Health

### Part of Collection:

2021-2022 NSDUH State Estimates of Substance Use and Mental Disorders

                        -  View/Download Files 
                        -  Other Related Reports 
                        -  Report Resources 

### View/Download Files

                                    - 2021-2022 Other Sources of State Level Data(pdf | 933.22 KB)
                                    - 2021-2022 Other Sources of State Level Data(htm | 98.71 KB)

### Other Related Reports

2021-2022 NSDUH National Maps of Prevalence Estimates, by State

Collected Date: 2021-2022 | Published Date: February 15, 2024 | Type: National Survey on Drug Use and Health

2021-2022 NSDUH: Guide to State Tables and Summary of Small Area Estimation Methodology

Collected Date: 2021-2022 | Published Date: February 15, 2024 | Type: National Survey on Drug Use and Health

2021-2022 NSDUH: Model-Based Estimated Prevalence for States

Collected Date: 2021-2022 | Published Date: February 15, 2024 | Type: National Survey on Drug Use and Health

2021-2022 NSDUH: Model-Based Estimated Totals for States (in Thousands):

Collected Date: 2021-2022 | Published Date: February 15, 2024 | Type: National Survey on Drug Use and Health

2021-2022 NSDUH: State-Specific Tables

Collected Date: 2021-2022 | Published Date: February 15, 2024 | Type: National Survey on Drug Use and Health

Comparison Between 2021-2022 NSDUH State Prevalence Estimates

Collected Date: 2021-2022 | Published Date: February 15, 2024 | Type: National Survey on Drug Use and Health

### Report Resources

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Data Archive (SAMHDA)'s page about NSDUH.

 < Back to Main content
#### § 401.23 Procedure.

The Water Resources Program will be prepared and considered by the Commission for adoption annually. Projects included in the Water Resources Program shall have been previously included in the Comprehensive Plan, except that a project may be added to both the Plan and the Program by concurrent action of the Commission. In such instances, the project's sponsor shall furnish the information listed in § 401.4(b) prior to the inclusion of the project in the Comprehensive Plan and Water Resources Program.

[89 FR 51825, June 20, 2024]
### SUBCHAPTER I—NATIONAL PARK SERVICE CAREER DEVELOPMENT, TRAINING, AND MANAGEMENT
<PAGE>
                                     EXHIBIT 21

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

                                AS OF MARCH 17, 1998

Royal Oak Mines Inc. (Amalgamated in the province of Ontario)


-    10502 Newfoundland Ltd. (Incorporated in the province of Newfoundland; 100%
     owned)

-    934962 Ontario Inc. (Incorporated in the province of Ontario; 100% owned)

-    Arctic Precious Metals, Inc., doing business as Royal Oak Mines (USA)
     (Incorporated in the state of Nevada; 100% owned)
     -    Oz Investments, Inc. (Incorporated in the state of Washington; 100%
          owned)

-    Beaverhouse Resources Ltd. (Incorporated in the province of Ontario; 100%
     owned)

-    Consolidated Professor Mines Limited (Amalgamated in the province of
     Ontario; 81% owned)

-    Kemess South Resources Limited Partnership (Organized under the laws of the
     province of British Columbia; ____% owned)

-    Northbelt Yellowknife Gold Mines Ltd. (Incorporated in the province of
     Ontario; 72% owned)

-    Ronnoco Gold Mines Limited (Incorporated in the province of Ontario;  89%
     owned)

-    Royal Eagle Exploration Inc. (Incorporated in the province of Ontario; 60%
     owned)
     -    First Eagle Holdings, Inc. (Incorporated in the state of Nevada; 100%
     owned)

-    Royal Oak Hope Brook Ltd. (Incorporated in the province of Ontario; 100%
     owned)

-    Royal Oak Timmins Ltd. (Incorporated in the province of Ontario; 100%
     owned)

-    Royal Oak Yellowknife Ltd. (Incorporated in the province of Ontario; 100%
     owned)

-    Witteck Development Inc. (Incorporated in the province of Ontario; 100%
     owned)
§ 801.11 Public values. ( a ) The basin has many points of archeological and historic interest, and is well endowed with vistas of aesthetic significance.
( b ) The Commission fully recognizes that the value of these areas cannot be measured simply in economic terms and will strive to preserve and promote them for the enjoyment and enrichment of present and future generations.
( c ) The Commission shall: ( 1 ) Seek the advice and assistance of appropriate societies and governmental agencies in the identification of archeological, historic, and scenic areas and unique lands in any planning or development affecting these attributes of the basin.
### Part A—Steens Mountain Cooperative Management and Protection Area
### §8008. Applicability

This chapter 1 is applicable to the United States and its territories, including American Samoa, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and the United States Virgin Islands.

(Pub. L. 110–140, title XIV, §1409, as added Pub. L. 110–314, title II, §238(3), Aug. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 3076.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act" and was translated as reading "this title", meaning title XIV of Pub. L. 110–140, known as the Virginia Graeme Baker Pool and Spa Safety Act, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

1 See References in Text note below.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Aurizon Mines Ltd. (the Company) is filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, its annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (the Report).

I, David P. Hall, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,to the best of my knowledge:

(i)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Aurizon Mines Ltd. and will be retained by Aurizon Mines Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



[ex131002.gif]

David P. Hall
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

March 31, 2005









1





---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Aurizon Mines Ltd. (the Company) is filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, its annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (the Report).

I, Ian S. Walton, Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(i)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Aurizon Mines Ltd. and will be retained by Aurizon Mines Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

[ex131004.gif]



Ian S. Walton 
Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer

March 31, 2005