alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
USDA GUS TRAINING

REAL ESTATE PAGE
Training Objectives

The training objectives for the GUS Real Estate page include:

• Understanding how to complete the Real Estate page in GUS.

• Understanding how to add new properties to the loan application.

• Understanding how to add mortgages to owned properties.
GUS Real Estate: Adding a Property

Steps:

1. Select Add Property.

2. Choose Account Owner/Borrower 

Name from the drop-down 

options.

3. If applicable, select the checkbox 

for Subject property of the loan.

4. Complete the address information.

5. Enter Property Value, Status, and 

Intended Occupancy and Monthly

Insurance, Taxes, Association

Dues, etc.

6. If Intended Occupancy is 

“investment”, complete income 

related fields in the For Investment 

Property Only section.
GUS Real Estate: Property Status

There are three options for the property status:

• Sold: This option is for properties that have been recently sold.

• Pending Sale: This is for properties that are under contract for sale.

• Retained: This option is for properties that borrowers will continue 

to own after the subject loan has closed, if the subject loan is a 

refinance or if the property is listed but not yet under contract for 

sale. Note: If Retained is selected, the Intended Occupancy field will 

open.
GUS Real Estate: Intended Occupancy

If the user selects “Retained” from the “Status” field, 

they must complete the “Intended Occupancy” field.

If that selection is “Investment”, the user needs to 

complete the “For Investment Property Only” section
GUS Real Estate: Adding a Mortgage to a Property
GUS Real Estate: Adding a Mortgage to a Property, Continued...

Steps:

1. Once the user has selected 

Add Mortgage, the fields in 

Section 1 must be 

completed.

2. Section 2 provides a Total

Mortgage Payment and a 

Total Unpaid Balance by 

calculating all mortgage 

balances and payments for 

that respective property.
End Slide 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
NO. 08-14-00153-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS RICARDO ZUNIGA APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS APPELLEE STATE’S SECOND MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE STATE’S BRIEF TO THE COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS: COMES NOW, the State of Texas in the above styled and numbered cause, pursuant to Rule 10.5(b) and Rule 38.6(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, and requests an extension of time in which to file the State’s brief, and would show the Court as follows: 1. The State’s brief was due to be filed on March 23, 2015. 2. This extension is requested for 30 days until April 22, 2014. 3. This is the State’s second motion for an extension of time. 4. The undersigned attorney for the State has been unable to complete the State’s brief in a timely manner during the briefing period and requests this extension due to the following factors: (a) The undersigned was researching and reviewing this Court’s opinion in State v. Gendron , No. 08-13-00119-CR, for the possible filing of a petition for discretionary review. The undersigned assisted the State Prosecuting Attorney’s Office and that office filed the petition for discretionary review.



## 08-14-00153-CR ACCEPTED 08-14-00153-CR EIGHTH COURT OF APPEALS

EL PASO, TEXAS 3/25/2015 2:19:32 PM DENISE PACHECO

CLERK(b) Th e u n d ers i g n edwas a s peak er fo r t h e Di st ri ctAt t o rn ey ’ s Offi ce atth e

an n u al Co n feren ce o n Cri m es Ag ai n st W o m enh el di n Dal l as , Tex as , o n M arch 1 6 -1 8 , 2 01 5 . Th e p res en t at i o n s req ui redex t en s i v e res earch an d p rep arat i o n . (c) Th e u n d ers i g n edp res en t edo ral arg u m en tt o th i s Co u rto nM arch 5 , 2 0 1 5 , i n E

n g l et o n v. Sta t e , 0 8 -1 3 -0 0 0 77 -CR. Th e u n d ers i g nedd idn o t p rep are t h e St at e’ s b ri ef i n th e cas e an dwas req ui red t o res earch an drev i ew th e cas e i n p rep arat i o n fo r o ral arg um en t. (d) Th e u n d ers i g n ed h as b een act i v el y as s i s t i n g th e d o m es ti c v i ol en ce u n i t o f t h e Di s tri ctAt t o rn ey ’ s Offi ce i ncas e s creen in g an dev al u at i o n, an dtri al res earch

. PRAYER W HEREFORE, the St at e p ray s th ati ts ex t en s i o n req u es twi l l b e g ran t ed

u n t i l Ap ri l 2 2 , 2 01 5

. Res p ect fu l ly s ub m i t t ed , J AIM E ESPARZA DISTRICT ATTORNEY 3 4 th J UDICIAL DISTRICT / s /J o e M o n s i v ai s J OE M ONSIVAIS ASST. DISTRICT ATTORNEY 2 0 1 EL PASO COUNTY COURTHOUSE 5 0 0 E. SAN ANTONIO EL PASO, TEXAS 7 9 9 0 1 (9 1 5 ) 5 46 -2 0 5 9 ex t . 3 3 0 8 FAX (9 1 5 ) 5 33 -5 5 2 0 SBN 0 0 7 9 5 5 3 7 jo m on s i vai s @ ep co u n ty .co m ATTORNEYS FOR THE STATE

2CERTI FI CATE OF SERVI CE

Th e u n d ers i g n edcert i fi es th ato nM arch 2 5 , 2 0 1 5 , a co p y o f t he fo reg o i n g St at e’ s m o ti o n was d el i v ered b y el ect ro n i c m ai l t o th e at t o rn ey fo r ap p el l an t , Rub en M o ral es , b y

u ti l i zi n g t h e E-s erv e s y s t em at : rb np m rl s @ g m ai l .co m

/ s /J o e M o n s i v ai s J OE M ONSIVAIS, A.D.A.

3
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Article Search 

# Article search

## Article Listing Lookup

                        -            Comunicado de prensa         Las solicitudes para nuevas pequeñas empresas se disparan a más de 17 millones bajo la Administración Biden-HarrisApril 11, 2024 
                        -            Comunicado de prensa         La SBA reconoce a los ganadores del premio Phoenix del año 2024 por sus destacados esfuerzos de recuperación ante desastresApril 4, 2024 
                        -            Comunicado de prensa         La SBA ofrece ayuda financiera a las pequeñas empresas afectadas por el colapso del puente Francis Scott KeyMarch 30, 2024 
                        -            Comunicado de prensa         La Administradora Guzmán de la SBA anuncia 17 nuevos Centros empresariales para MujeresMarch 29, 2024 
                        -            Comunicado de prensa         La Agencia Federal de Pequeños Negocios anuncia a los copatrocinadores de la Semana Nacional de las Pequeñas Empresas 2024March 28, 2024 
                        -            Comunicado de prensa         La SBA reconoce a los Ganadores de los Premios de la  Oficina de Fianzas de Garantía del AF 23March 28, 2024 
                        -            Comunicado de prensa         La Agencia Federal de Pequeños Negocios felicita al Exportador del Año 2024March 20, 2024 
                        -            Comunicado de prensa         La SBA felicita a los Pequeños Empresarios Estatales del Año 2024  March 14, 2024 
                        -            Comunicado de prensa         La Agencia Federal de Pequeños Negocios y la Dirección de Ciberseguridad Nacional de la Casa Blanca organizarán un evento virtual el 21 de marzoMarch 14, 2024 

#### Pagination

-                  Current page              1 
-                  Page              2 
-                  Page              3 
-                  Page              4 
-                  Page              5 
-                  Page              6 
-                  Page              7 
-                  Page              8 
-                  Page              9 
-  ... 
-  Next
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.8
SECOND AMENDMENT OF THE 
FIRST COMMUNITY FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. 
AMENDED AND RESTATED 2008 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
WHEREAS, First Community Financial Partners, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the First Community Financial Partners, Inc. Amended and Restated 2008 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended (the “2008 Plan”);
WHEREAS, pursuant to and subject to Section 6.1 of the 2008 Plan, the Board may amend the 2008 Plan at any time;
WHEREAS, the Board at its meeting on June 19, 2014 approved an amendment of the 2008 Plan by approving the extension of the terms of certain outstanding stock options under the 2008 Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Board desires to ratify the amendment of the 2008 Plan effected on June 19, 2014 as a result of the Board’s approval of the extension of the terms of certain outstanding stock options under the 2008 Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, effective as of June 19, 2014, the 2008 Plan is amended in the following particulars:
		
	1.
	The second sentence of Section 2.2 of the 2008 Plan is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


“Except as provided otherwise by the Committee, an option or SAR shall not expire later than ten (10) years after the date of its grant (five (5) years in the case of a 10% Stockholder with respect to an ISO).”
		
	2.
	In all other respects, the 2008 Plan remains unchanged and in full force and effect.







1024780.v2
#### § 78.5 General restrictions.

Cattle may not be moved interstate except in compliance with this subpart and with 9 CFR part 86. Cattle moved interstate under permit in accordance with this subpart are not required to be accompanied by an interstate certificate of veterinary inspection or owner-shipper statement.

[78 FR 2069, Jan. 9, 2013]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1999
<CASH>                                          32,496
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,153
<ALLOWANCES>                                       343
<INVENTORY>                                      3,704
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                47,380
<PP&E>                                         459,631
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,872
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 673,920
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,219
<BONDS>                                        400,577
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           61,442
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            40
<OTHER-SE>                                      81,315
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   673,920
<SALES>                                         49,628
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               288,163
<CGS>                                           17,588
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  242,534
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                93,573
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,094
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,272
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,932
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,134
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,798
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,798
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Eagle Bancorp (the "Company") on Form
      10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Larry A. Dreyer,
      Chief Executive Officer, and Peter J. Johnson, Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Larry
                A. Dreyer
            
            
            /s/ Peter
                J. JohnsonLarry
                A. Dreyer
            
            
            Peter
                J. JohnsonPresident
                and Chief Executive Officer
              November
                8, 2006
            
            
            Exec.
                VP/Chief Financial Officer
              November
                8, 2006




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
      foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission and shall not be considered filed as part of the Report.
#### § 707.9 Tiering.

In accordance with the CEQ NEPA regulations 40 CFR 1502.4(d) and 1508.28(a), this NEPA rule emphasizes the use of tiering to relate broad and narrow actions. The level of detail in EIS's and EA's prepared by RBC's, WRC interagency committees or WRC coordinating committees will reflect the level of detail in the plans, particularly the comprehensive and policy nature of comprehensive, coordinated, joint plans or elements or revisions thereof. These EIS's are not intended to substitute for individual statements on individual projects as more detailed planning and analysis will be required for major Federal actions proposed in these plans. The “policy” or “overview” EIS should serve as the framework and introduction for a more site-specific project EIS developed by the implementing Federal agency. Environmental impact statements for regional water resource management and Level B plans will generally address the items in the recommended format (40 CFR 1502.10) on the basis of water and related land resources of an entire region or river basin. This is the level of consideration at which the environmental issues and considerations are most relevant to decisionmaking. They may also address groups of interrelated or individual plan elements where these involve significant environmental considerations.
#### § 30.5 What is the Attorney General's obligation with respect to Federal interagency coordination?

The Attorney General, to the extent practicable, consults with and seeks advice from all other substantially affected federal departments and agencies in an effort to assure full coordination between such agencies and the Department regarding programs and activities covered under these regulations.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Document Search 
-  All Small Mentor-Protégé Program Mentor-Protégé Agreement Addendum 

# All Small Mentor-Protégé Program Mentor-Protégé Agreement Addendum

## About this document and download

  Download  .pdf

**Related Programs**    Related programs:  

##                 Related documents            

-        Support          SBA Mentor Protégé  Program  Agreement Template
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 78 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 78

  To ensure a complete analysis of the potential impacts of rules on 
                            small entities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 10, 2019

 Mr. Rubio (for himself and Ms. Ernst) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To ensure a complete analysis of the potential impacts of rules on 
                            small entities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Hearing Small Businesses Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF COVERED AGENCIES UNDER THE REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY 
              ACT.

    Section 609 of title 5, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b), in the matter preceding paragraph 
        (1), by striking ``an initial regulatory flexibility analysis 
        which a covered agency is required to conduct by this chapter'' 
        and inserting ``a proposed rule or interim final rule for which 
        a covered agency is required to conduct an initial regulatory 
        flexibility analysis by this chapter''; and
            (2) in subsection (d)--
                    (A) in paragraph (2), by striking ``and'' at the 
                end;
                    (B) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at the 
                end and inserting a semicolon; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(4) the United States Fish and Wildlife Service; and
            ``(5) the Internal Revenue Service.''.
                                 <all>
```
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed February 9, 2016.

________________

No. 3D16-292

Lower Tribunal No. 16-37

________________

Dan Simmons,

Petitioner,

vs.

Marydell Guevara, etc., et al.,

Repondents.

A Case of Original Jurisdiction – Habeas Corpus.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Natasha Baker-Bradley, Assistant

Public Defender, for petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Sandra Lipman, Assistant Attorney

General, for respondents.

Before WELLS, LAGOA and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.
Based on the State’s admirable confession of error, we grant the Petitioner’s

emergency petition for writ of habeas corpus, and order the immediate release of

Petitioner on his own recognizance as required by Rule 3.134(1), Fla. Rules of

Crim. Proc.

Petitioner was arrested on January 1, 2016 for burglary of an occupied

dwelling and domestic battery via strangulation. Petitioner was held without bond,

pending the filing of charges.

On February 3, 2016, the 33rd day of Petitioner’s detention, the State moved

for an extension of time to file an information pursuant to Rule 3.134(2). In

response, the trial court amended Petitioner’s “no bond” status to a $10,000 bond

and placed Petitioner on house arrest.

Petitioner objected to those terms, arguing that, since the State had not

articulated good cause for an extension as required by Rule 3.134(2), Rule

3.134(1) required Petitioner to be released on his own recognizance.

While not entirely clear from the record, it seems the trial court believed that

the scheduling of an adversary preliminary hearing pursuant to Rule 3.133 could

relieve the State from its obligation to either file an information within 33 days of

Petitioner’s arrest or show good cause why an extension was required.

On February 8, 2016, Petitioner filed the instant petition seeking emergency

habeas relief. We ordered the State to respond on an expedited basis. In its

2
response, the State concedes that, pursuant to Rule 3.134, the trial court erred in

conflating Rule 3.133’s preliminary hearing provisions with Rule 3.134’s

requirements and that the State has not demonstrated good cause for an extension

under Rule 3.134.

Therefore, we grant the petition and order that Petitioner be immediately

released on his own recognizance as required by Rule 3.134.

3
March 30, 2016

Manager, Flight Standards Service

Unmanned Aircraft Systems Integration Office FAA Headquarters, Building 10A 800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591

Re: Petit ion to Amend Exemption No. 14120 to Regulatory Docket No FAA

- 2015

- 4602 for Cochise Aerial Perspective LLC ( CAP ) for additional aircraft

.

A ttention: FAA UAS Integration Office

Cochise Aerial Perspective LLC respectfully requests the addition of the following aircraft to our Exemption No. 14120 :

1) DJI

- Ph antom 3

• ( Note may be eligible for summary grant/amendment by previous FAA a nalysis of Exemption No s. 11062, 11109,11112, and 11213 ) 2) DJI

- Phantom 4

• (Precedent may have already been set)

CAP ’s existing safety standards and procedures as outlined in our Flight Operation & Procedures Manual (FOPM) will continue for the additional Aircraft. We will follow the recommended

m aintenance and Operations Parameters set forth by each of these respective UAV m anufactures. Please do not hesitate to contact me at the phone number or via the e

- mail address provided above should you have any questions or concerns.

Respectfully submitted,

Michael Drake

Member Cochise Aerial Perspective LLC 2457 East Kalispell Ave Sierra Vista, AZ 85650

Email: pir84lifearg@gmail.com ; phone: (520) 255

- 3776 Michael Drake

Owner Cochise Aerial Perspective LLC 2457 East Kalispell Ave. Sierra Vista, AZ 85650 (520) 255

- 3776 pir84lifearg@gmail.com
§ 4.304 Payment. ( a ) A payment required under this subpart must be made by check payable to the United States Treasury. The check must indicate that the payment is for *ECPA Fees.*
( b ) If a payment required under this subpart is not made within the time period prescribed for making such payment, interest and penalty charges will be assessed. Interest and penalty charges will be computed in accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3717 and 4 CFR part 102.
( c ) The Commission will not issue a license or exemption, unless the applicant has made full payments of any fees due under § 4.303(c).
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 49 (Monday, March 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 13615]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5835]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9280-1]


Notice of Proposed Administrative Settlement Pursuant to the 
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 122(i) of the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, as amended 
(CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. 9622(i), notice is hereby given of a proposed 
administrative settlement concerning the Grants Chlorinated Solvents 
Superfund Site, Grants, Cibola County, New Mexico.
    The settlement requires the Holiday Cleaners and Laundry to pay a 
total of $1000.00 as payment of response costs to the Hazardous 
Substances Superfund plus interest. The settlement includes a covenant 
not to sue pursuant to Section 107 of CERCLA, 42, U.S.C. 9607.
    For thirty (30) days following the date of publication of this 
notice, the Agency will receive written comments relating to this 
notice and will receive written comments relating to the settlement. 
The Agency will consider all comments received and may modify or 
withdraw its consent to the settlement if comments received disclose 
facts or considerations which indicate that the settlement is 
inappropriate, improper, or inadequate. The Agency's response to any 
comments received will be available for public inspection at 1445 Ross 
Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before April 13, 2011.

ADDRESSES: The proposed settlement and additional background 
information relating to the settlement are available for public 
inspection at 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733. A copy of the 
proposed settlement may be obtained from Jamie Bradsher, 1445 Ross 
Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733 or by calling (214) 665-7111. Comments 
should reference the Grants Chlorinated Solvents Superfund Site, 
Grants, Cibola County, New Mexico and EPA Docket Number 06-07-10, and 
should be addressed to Jamie Bradsher at the address listed above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  I-Jung Chiang, 1445 Ross Avenue, 
Dallas, Texas 75202-2733 or call (214) 665-2160.

    Dated: March 4, 2011.
Al Armendariz,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2011-5835 Filed 3-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P