alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
``

# CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB of ASP Ventures Corp. (Registrant) for the quarterly
period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (Report), I, Ross Wilmot, chief executive officer and
chief financial officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

|(1) | This Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly represents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition of Registrant at the end of the period covered
          by this Report and results of operations of Registrant for the period covered by
          this Report.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Ross Wilmot

Ross Wilmot

Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies this
Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to
the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant for
the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This
certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made
before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation
language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written
statement required by §906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained
by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
#### § 560.1 Cooperation with States and Territories.

The provisions in § 321.1 of this chapter authorizing the Administrator to cooperate with any State (including Puerto Rico) or any organized Territory in developing and administering a meat inspection program for the State or Territory apply with respect to fish and fish products inspection.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-24-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-24-1996
<CASH>                                       111133000
<SECURITIES>                                 134677000
<RECEIVABLES>                                 47771000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  225801000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             546271000
<PP&E>                                      1405084000
<DEPRECIATION>                               643693000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              1447139000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        337242000
<BONDS>                                      188822000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                      60645000
<OTHER-SE>                                   762112000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                1447139000
<SALES>                                     3860579000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            3860579000
<CGS>                                       2707682000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               3692752000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             7235000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              167827000
<INCOME-TAX>                                  65674000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          102153000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 102153000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.710
        


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)April 4, 2011





Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc.


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Delaware

000-23143

13-3379479(State or other jurisdiction

of incorporation)

(Commission

File Number)

(IRS Employer

Identification No.)777 Old Saw Mill River Road, Tarrytown, New York

10591(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)Registrant's telephone number, including area code (914) 789-2800





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (seeGeneral Instruction A.2. below):








oWritten communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





oSoliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)




oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))




oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))










Item 8.01.  Other Events.





Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. today issued the press release included in this Report as Exhibit 99.1.  The information contained therein is incorporated into this Item 8.01 by this reference.





Item 9.01.  Financial Statements and Exhibits.





(d) Exhibits





Exhibit No.     Description





99.1
Press Release dated April 4, 2011.




















SIGNATURES








Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.








PROGENICS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.


By:/s/ ROBERT A. MCKINNEY


Robert A. McKinney


Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President,


Finance & Operations and Treasurer











Date:  April 4, 2011
§ 2.34 Rescission of parole. ( a ) When an effective date of parole has been set by the Commission, release on that date is conditioned upon continued satisfactory conduct by the prisoner. If a prisoner granted such a date has been found in violation of institution rules by a Discipline Hearing Officer, or the Center Disciplinary Committee, or is alleged to have committed a new criminal act at any time prior to the delivery of the certificate of parole, the Commissioner shall be advised promptly of such information. The prisoner shall not be released until the institution has been notified that no change has been made in the Commission's order to parole. Following receipt of such information, the Commissioner may reopen the case and retard the parole date for up to 90 days without a hearing, or 120 days for a DC Code sentenced prisoner, or schedule a rescission hearing under this section on the next available docket at the institution or on the first docket following return to a federal institution from a community corrections center or a state or local halfway house.
( b ) Upon the ordering of a rescission hearing under this section, the prisoner shall be afforded written notice specifying the information to be considered at the hearing. The notice shall further state that the purpose of the hearing will be to decide whether rescission of the parole date is warranted based on the charges listed on the notice, and shall advise the prisoner of the procedural rights described below.
( c ) A hearing before a Discipline Hearing Officer, or the Center Disciplinary Committee, resulting in a finding that the prisoner has committed a violation of disciplinary rules may be relied upon by the Commission as conclusive evidence of institutional misconduct. However, the prisoner will be afforded an opportunity to explain any mitigating circumstances, and to present documentary evidence in mitigation of the misconduct at the rescission hearing.
( d ) In the case of allegations of new criminal conduct committed prior to delivery of the parole certificate, the Commission may consider documentary evidence and/or written testimony presented by the prisoner, arresting authorities, or other persons.
( e ) The prisoner may be represented at a rescission hearing by a person of his choice. The function of the prisoner's representative shall be to offer a statement following the discussion of the charges with the prisoner, and to provide such additional information as the hearing examiner may require. However, the hearing examiner may limit or exclude any irrelevant or repetitious statement.
( f ) The evidence upon which the rescission hearing is to be conducted shall be disclosed to the prisoner upon request, subject to the exemptions set forth at § 2.55. If the parole grant is rescinded, the Commission shall furnish to the prisoner a written statement of its findings and the evidence relied upon.
[44 FR 3406, Jan. 16, 1979, as amended at 45 FR 59871, Sept. 11, 1980; 47 FR 2313, Jan. 15, 1982; 54 FR 15173, Apr. 17, 1989; 68 FR 41530, July 14, 2003; 86 FR 51272, Sept. 15, 2021; 87 FR 66550, Nov. 4, 2022]
Taste a tomato.

•

Crunch a carrot. 

•

Savor a sweet potato. 

•

Rock your colors! 

Choose dark-green, red, 

and orange veggies at 

meals and snacks.

They’re Tasty and They Know It!

Explore a world of possibilities 

in the garden and on your plate. U.S. Department of Agriculture • Food and Nutrition Service 

April 2013 • FNS-454-B • USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
§ 115.334 Specialized training: Investigations. ( a ) In addition to the general training provided to all employees pursuant to § 115.331, the agency shall ensure that, to the extent the agency itself conducts sexual abuse investigations, its investigators have received training in conducting such investigations in confinement settings.
( b ) Specialized training shall include techniques for interviewing juvenile sexual abuse victims, proper use of *Miranda* and *Garrity* warnings, sexual abuse evidence collection in confinement settings, and the criteria and evidence required to substantiate a case for administrative action or prosecution referral.
( c ) The agency shall maintain documentation that agency investigators have completed the required specialized training in conducting sexual abuse investigations.
( d ) Any State entity or Department of Justice component that investigates sexual abuse in juvenile confinement settings shall provide such training to its agents and investigators who conduct such investigations.
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Appellee, *v.*Billy Ward, Appellant.

(No. 70-199;

Fifth District

November 9, 1971.

Morton Zwiclc, Director of Defender Project, of Chicago, (William E. Lasko, of Defender Project, of counsel,) for appellant.

WiUiam J. Scott, Attorney General, of Chicago, and Robert Rice, State’s Attorney, of Belleville, for the People.

Mr. JUSTICE JONES

delivered the opinion of the court;

The principal question presented by appeHant is whether his plea of guilty to attempted murder was invalid because he was not sufficiently admonished as to the sentence. Defendant was sentenced to the penitentiary for a period of two to twenty years. The pertinent part of the admonition was, “the court has the authority to sentence you to any time up to 20 years. Do you understand that?”

*889The relevant portion of the statute fixing the penalty for attempt is found in Ill. Rev. Stat., ch. 38, par. 8 — 4, subsection (c) provides as foUows:

> "(c) Penalty

> A person convicted of an attempt may be fined or imprisoned or both not to exceed the maximum provided for the offense attempted * * *

> (1) the penalty for attempt to commit # # , murder, s * * shall not exceed imprisonment for 20 years.”

No reference has been made by appellant to any specific provision of the Federal or State Constitution.

 It appears that the defendant received what is asked on his behalf: “to be informed of the permissible range of sentences which he could receive.” The date of the guilty plea was February 18, 1970, which antedated the adoption of Supreme Court Rule 402. No useful purpose would be served by expounding on the apphcable rules which are fully set forth in *People v. Terry,*44 Ill.2d 38, 253 N.E.2d 383; *People v. Scott,*43 Ill.2d 135, 251 N.E.2d 190; *People v. Evans,*45 Ill.2d 265, 259 N.E.2d 41; and *People v. Eads,*(Ill.App.2d), 272 N.E.2d 293. The law is concerned with substantial rights of parties, and we cannot conceive, nor does counsel claim, that the defendant was misinformed or in any way harmed by the court’s faffure to tell him that he might receive a lesser minimum sentence than that he received.

 Defendant also has argued that he should have received probation instead of a sentence. However, no apphcation for probation was made in the trial court and thus no issue touching denial of probation is before us for review. Defendant’s contention that his sentence is excessive has some merit. While we find no fault with the minimum of two years imprisonment for one convicted of attempted murder for shooting several times at police officers we nevertheless note that defendant has no prior felony convictions and believe the proper objectives of sentencing wiU be better served if the maximum sentence to twenty years is reduced to six years.

Judgment of conviction affirmed. Maximum sentence reduced to six years.

Judgment affirmed.

EBERSPACHER, P. J., and MORAN, J., concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  SBA Leadership 
-  Shafee Carnegie 

#   Shafee Carnegie

Assistant Inspector General for Investigations

            Download high-resolution image          

Shafee T. Carnegie is the Assistant Inspector General for Investigations at the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) - Office of Inspector General (OIG). Mr. Carnegie has over 25 years of law enforcement, management, and executive experience in federal law enforcement. He most recently served as Deputy Assistant Inspector General for Investigations (DAIGI) at the U.S. Department of Education and previously as DAIGI at the Department of Interior - Office of Inspector General. Prior to his initial DAIGI appointment, Mr. Carnegie has served more than 20 years in a variety of progressively higher-level law enforcement positions at the U.S. Postal Service - Office of Inspector General, Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services - Office of Inspector General. He also served as a Senior Special Agent with the U.S. Government Accountability Office’s Forensic Audits and Special Investigations Team, as a Congressional Investigator, mainly focused on rooting out fraud, waste, and abuse in Federal programs and operations. Mr. Carnegie began his federal law enforcement career as an Inspector with the U.S. Department of Justice, Immigration and Naturalization Service in New York, NY.

Mr. Carnegie has received numerous awards and commendations throughout his career. Most notably, he was the recipient of the 2011 Annual Greg Boss Memorial Award from the U.S. Postal Service - Office of Inspector General and the 2018 Inspector General Award for Excellence from the Department of Interior - Office of Inspector General. He also is a graduate of the Department of Defense’s National Center for Credibility Assessment, formally trained as a Polygraph Examiner.

Mr. Carnegie is a native of New York City, New York, and holds a Bachelor of Arts Degree in Criminal Justice from Virginia Union University, and a Certificate of Professional Development from The Wharton School | University of Pennsylvania’s Aresty Institute of Executive Education.
Study / studies to be entered into CDX when completed
#### Carlos Sedeno, an Infant, by His Parent and Natural Guardian, Debra Sedeno, et al., Respondents, v Victoria Luciano, Appellant.

[824 NYS2d 294]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.), entered November 14, 2005, which denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendant dismissing the complaint.

At all relevant times, plaintiffs lived in the house next door to the multifamily house owned by defendant. On February 17, 2003, the infant plaintiff was playing in front of his house when he saw a man open the gate to the fence enclosing defendant’s backyard, whereupon a dog emerged, ran over to the infant plaintiff, and bit him. Plaintiffs allege that the dog belonged to the female tenant of defendant’s basement and the tenant’s boyfriend. In this action to recover for the infant plaintiff’s injuries, Supreme Court denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. We reverse on the ground that defendant, who did not own the dog but was merely *366the landlord of the premises where the dog was kept, had no responsibility to prevent a dog-bite incident that allegedly occurred off defendant’s property *(see Gomez v Delacruz,*27 AD3d 219 [2006]; *Foster v Jordan,*269 AD2d 152, 153 [2000]; *Phillips v Coffee To Go,*269 AD2d 123, 124 [2000]; *Shen v Kornienko,*253 AD2d 396 [1998]; *see also Braithwaite v Presidential Prop. Servs., Inc.,*24 AD3d 487 [2d Dept 2005]; *Weipert v Oldfield,*298 AD2d 974 [4th Dept 2002]; *Terrio v Daggett,*208 AD2d 1163 [3d Dept 1994]). Moreover, plaintiffs present insufficient evidence to raise an issue of fact as to whether the dog had vicious propensities, or, even if the dog had such propensities, as to whether defendant had notice of them. Concur—Friedman, J.E, Marlow, Sullivan, Nardelli and Gonzalez, JJ.
#### § 367.2160 Account 216, Unappropriated retained earnings.

This account must include the balances, either debit or credit, of unappropriated retained earnings arising from earnings of the service company. This account must not include any amounts representing the undistributed earnings of subsidiary companies.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 54 (Monday, March 21, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 15349]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6267]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET


Fiscal Year 2011 Cost of Hospital and Medical Care Treatment 
Furnished by the Department of Defense Medical Treatment Facilities; 
Certain Rates Regarding Recovery From Tortiously Liable Third Persons

AGENCY: Executive Office of the President, Office of Management and 
Budget.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: By virtue of the authority vested in the President by Section 
2(a) of Public Law 87-693 (76 Stat. 593; 42 U.S.C. 2652), and delegated 
to the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) by the 
President through Executive Order No. 11060 of November 7, 1962 and 
Executive Order No. 11541 of July 1, 1970, the rates referenced below 
are hereby established. These rates are for use in connection with the 
recovery from tortiously liable third persons for the cost of inpatient 
medical services furnished by military treatment facilities through the 
Department of Defense (DoD). The rates have been established in 
accordance with the requirements of OMB Circular A-25, requiring 
reimbursement of the full cost of all services provided. The inpatient 
medical rates referenced are effective upon publication of this notice 
in the Federal Register and will remain in effect until further notice. 
Pharmacy rates are updated periodically. Previously published 
outpatient rates remain in effect until further notice. A full analysis 
of the rates is posted at the DoD's Uniform Business Office Web site: 
http://www.tricare.mil/ocfo/_docs/FY_2011_DC_Inpt_Rate_dtd_9_28_10.pdf. The rates can be found at: http://www.tricare.mil/ocfo/mcfs/ubo/mhs_rates.cfm.

Jacob J. Lew,
Director.
[FR Doc. 2011-6267 Filed 3-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3110-01-P
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Water quality in basin-fillaquifers of the southwestern United States : Arizona, California, Colorado,Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah, 1993-2009**
 
Report | Report lowresolution | Appendix 2
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.4/2:1358
Item Number:0620-A (online)
CGP systemNumber:000942767
 
April 26, 2018
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.79


October 22, 2015




George F. Knight
4685 Pine Tree Court
Westerville, OH 43082




Dear George:




It is a pleasure to confirm your promotion to the role of Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.  The purpose of this letter is to outline the terms associated with your transition to this role.  In your new position you will continue to be located in Columbus, OH and you will report to me.


Please acknowledge acceptance of this offer by signing in the space provided on the last page and returning the original to me.  This letter contains all of the terms and conditions of this offer, no others are authorized and you acknowledge that you are not relying on any terms or conditions that are not listed in this offer.  This offer expires November 23, 2015.


If you have any questions or there is anything requiring clarification, please give me a call.  Congratulations and I look forward to your continued contributions.




Sincerely,


/s/ Craig O. Morrison


Craig O. Morrison
President & CEO




cc:    Judy Sonnett





















































HEXION INC.
SUMMARY OF TERMS OF EMPLOYMENT
FOR:  George F. Knight




		
	Position:
	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




		
	Base Salary:
	$475,000 per year




		
	Anticipated Start Date:
	January 1, 2016


    
		
	Incentive:
	Based on your position and salary, you are eligible to participate in Hexion’s annual incentive compensation plan (the “ICP”).  Your target incentive award is 70% of your Base Salary.  The ICP is contingent upon the achievement of specific company goals as determined by the Compensation Committee of the Hexion LLC Board of Managers (the “Compensation Committee”). The terms of the ICP and eligibility for participation are reviewed annually.




		
	Long Term Incentive (LTI):
	Based on your position and salary, you are eligible to participate in company LTI programs. All nominations must be reviewed and approved by the Compensation Committee.  




		
	Terms of Plans:
	Some of the above are highlights of various plans or programs, and all are subject to the terms of the actual plans and programs.




		
	"AT WILL" Statement:
	The legal nature of this employment contract is one "AT WILL", which means that either you or the Company can end this relationship at any time.






OFFER ACCEPTED:






/s/ George F. Knight                    October 22, 2015
Signature                        Date