alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2007129EN.01002701.xml

| 9.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/27

---

Action brought on 13 April 2007 — Skareby v Commission

(Case F-34/07)

(2007/C 129/46)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Carina Skareby (Bichkek, Kirghizistan) (represented by: S. Rodrigues and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the applicant's Career Development Report (CDR) for 2005; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the applicant's Career Development Report (CDR) for 2005;

| — | Annul, in so far as necessary, the decision of the Appointing Authority (AIPN) rejecting the applicant's appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul, in so far as necessary, the decision of the Appointing Authority (AIPN) rejecting the applicant's appeal;

| — | Indicate to the AIPN the effects of annulment of the contested decisions and in particular the adoption of a new CDR for 2005, this time in compliance with the statutory rules; |
| --- | --- |

—

Indicate to the AIPN the effects of annulment of the contested decisions and in particular the adoption of a new CDR for 2005, this time in compliance with the statutory rules;

| — | Order the AIPN to pay to the applicant: i) a sum fixed ex aequo et bono at EUR 15 000 in respect of compensation for her non-material damage; ii) a sum fixed ex aequo et bono at EUR 15 000 in respect of compensation for the professional injury suffered by her; iii) a sum to be fixed in equity by the Tribunal in respect of her financial loss, late payment interest to run on each of those sums at the legal rate with effect from the date on which they become payable; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the AIPN to pay to the applicant: i) a sum fixed ex aequo et bono at EUR 15 000 in respect of compensation for her non-material damage; ii) a sum fixed ex aequo et bono at EUR 15 000 in respect of compensation for the professional injury suffered by her; iii) a sum to be fixed in equity by the Tribunal in respect of her financial loss, late payment interest to run on each of those sums at the legal rate with effect from the date on which they become payable;

ex aequo et bono

ex aequo et bono

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of her claim, the applicant first alleges failure to comply with the rules governing establishment of the CDR. The administration infringed the rules of procedure established by the general implementing provisions of Article 43 of the Staff Regulations and committed manifest errors of assessment.

The applicant then alleges infringement of the rights of the defence, the principle of sound administration and the duty to have regard for the welfare of officials.

Finally, she alleges that the administration misused its powers and misused the procedure.

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-1898

ALAIN TSOBGNY, Petitioner,
versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A95-545-788) Submitted: March 18, 2005 Decided: April 4, 2005 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bokwe G. Mofor, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Terri J. Scadron, Assistant Director, Joshua E. Braunstein, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).PER CURIAM: Alain Tsobgny, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming without opinion the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. To obtain reversal of a determination denying eligibility for relief, an alien “must show that the evidence he presented was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.” INS v. Elias-Zacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 483-84 (1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and conclude that Tsobgny fails to show that the evidence compels a contrary result. Having failed to qualify for asylum, Tsobgny cannot meet the higher standard to qualify for withholding of removal. Chen v. INS , 195 F.3d 198, 205 (4th Cir. 1999); INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca , 480 U.S. 421, 430 (1987). Finally, we uphold the IJ’s finding that Tsobgny failed to establish that it was more likely than not that he would be tortured if removed to Cameroon. See 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(2) (2004). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Document Search 
-  White House Initiative On Historically Black Colleges and Universities 

# White House Initiative on Historically Black Colleges and Universities

## About this document and download

  Download  .pdf
HomeLatest FilingsPrevious Page

    - SEC Home  »
    - Search the Next-Generation EDGAR System  »
    - Company Search  »
    - Current Page

TWO INTERNATIONAL PLACEBOSTON MA 02110         

TWO INTERNATIONAL PLACEBOSTON MA 02110         6174828260

Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Opportunities Fund CIK#: 0001969229 (see all company filings)
State location: MA | State of Inc.: **MA**Get **insider transactions** for this **issuer**.File Number: **812-15443**

||
||
EPA Docket No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0600

The following information is located in the confidentiali ty files of the Director, Sector Policies and Programs Division, Office of Air Quality P lanning and Standards, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, N orth Carolina 27711. This information is confidential pending final determination by t he Administrator and is not available for public inspection.

Memorandum from K. Schaffner, RTI International, to S . Shedd, EPA/OAQPS. Site visit to Chevron Pipe Line Company in Nederland, Texas on June 23, 2010. Dated August 2010.

Draft.

The site visit memorandum contains information about ma rine vessel loading at the Chevron Pipe Line Company facility. The confidential mat erial is comprised of 11 pages.
§ 1315.400 Penalties. ( a ) Any person who makes an expenditure prohibited herein shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $12,000 and not more than $120,000 for each such expenditure.
( b ) Any person who fails to file or amend the disclosure form (see appendix B) to be filed or amended if required herein, shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $12,000 and not more than $120,000 for each such failure.
( c ) A filing or amended filing on or after the date on which an administrative action for the imposition of a civil penalty is commenced does not prevent the imposition of such civil penalty for a failure occurring before that date. An administrative action is commenced with respect to a failure when an investigating official determines in writing to commence an investigation of an allegation of such failure.
( d ) In determining whether to impose a civil penalty, and the amount of any such penalty, by reason of a violation by any person, the agency shall consider the nature, circumstances, extent, and gravity of the violation, the effect on the ability of such person to continue in business, any prior violations by such person, the degree of culpability of such person, the ability of the person to pay the penalty, and such other matters as may be appropriate.
( e ) First offenders under paragraph (a) or (b) of this section shall be subject to a civil penalty of $12,000, absent aggravating circumstances. Second and subsequent offenses by persons shall be subject to an appropriate civil penalty between $12,000 and $120,000, as determined by the agency head or his or her designee.
( f ) An imposition of a civil penalty under this section does not prevent the United States from seeking any other remedy that may apply to the same conduct that is the basis for the imposition of such civil penalty.
[55 FR 6737, 6748, Feb. 26, 1990, as amended at 61 FR 55098, Oct. 24, 1996; 67 FR 9925, Mar. 5, 2002]
§ 2.16 Parole of prisoner in state, local, or territorial institution. ( a ) Any person who is serving a sentence of imprisonment for any offense against the United States, but who is confined therefor in a state reformatory or other state or territorial institution, shall be eligible for parole by the Commission on the same terms and conditions, by the same authority, and subject to recommittal for the violation of such parole, as though he were confined in a Federal penitentiary, reformatory, or other correctional institution.
( b ) Federal prisoners serving concurrent state and Federal sentences in state, local, or territorial institutions shall be furnished upon request parole application forms. Upon receipt of the application and any supplementary classification material submitted by the institution, parole consideration shall be made by an examiner panel of the appropriate region on the record only. If such prisoner is released from his state sentence prior to a Federal grant of parole, he shall be given a personal hearing as soon as feasible after receipt at a Federal institution.
( c ) Prisoners who are serving Federal sentences exclusively but who are being boarded in State, local, or territorial institutions may be provided hearings at such facilities or may be transferred by the Bureau of Prisons to Federal Institutions for hearings by examiner panels of the Commission.
(18 U.S.C. 4203, 4204)
[42 FR 39809, Aug. 5, 1977, as amended at 45 FR 44924, July 2, 1980; 50 FR 36424, Sept. 6, 1985]
The Honorable Anthony Foxx 

Secretary of Transportation 

United States Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Secretary Foxx, 

May 17,2015 

Re: Docket No. DOT-OST-2015-0082 

Felix in Hollywood Tour Company entertains many foreign visitors, who contribute to growing my 

business's revenues. As the company's owner, I believe it is important to preserve this flow of customer 

traffic and revenue. My international customers depend on access to low-cost and convenient routes 

between their homes and LAX airport. Competition in international travel has led to more choices and 

better service, and the gains made through the Open Skies policies should be preserved for travelers who 

bring important business to the southern California economy. 

For five years, my company has had to compete with many other tour providers in the Hollywood area. It 

is not right for big businesses to ask the U.S. government for help when they can't compete. If small 

businesses have to find a way to make it, then the big airlines, which have access to much greater 

financial resources, should also have to find a way to improve their services and offer more competitive 

rates. The U.S. government should protect the needs of its citizens rather than big businesses. For 

consumers, the best option is when competition is free and open. 

Philip Mershon
§ 385.1107 Evaluations (Rule 1107). ( a ) Staff will consider the filings made in connection with the petition for adjustment. Staff may also consider information received under paragraph (b) of this section. If Staff obtains information under paragraphs (b)(1) or (b)(3) of this section and relies upon such information, the petitioner will be advised of such information and will be given 15 days to respond to such information.
( b ) ( 1 ) Staff may initiate an investigation of any statement in a petition and use in its evaluation any relevant fact obtained in such an investigation.
( 2 ) Staff may request additional information from the petitioner.
( 3 ) Staff may solicit and accept submissions from interveners or third persons relevant to the petition.
( 4 ) Staff may consider information obtained in informal conferences held under Rule 1111 (adjustment conferences).
[Order 225, 47 FR 19022, May 3, 1982, as amended by Order 24-C, 50 FR 21596, May 28, 1985]
### **CHAPTER 35—ENDANGERED SPECIES**

Sec.
1531.
Congressional findings and declaration of purposes and policy.
1532.
Definitions.
1533.
Determination of endangered species and threatened species.
1534.
Land acquisition.
1535.
Cooperation with States.
1536.
Interagency cooperation.
1537.
International cooperation.
1537a.
Convention implementation.
1538.
Prohibited acts.
1539.
Exceptions.
1540.
Penalties and enforcement.
1541.
Endangered plants.
1542.
Authorization of appropriations.
1543.
Construction with Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972.
1544.
Annual cost analysis by Fish and Wildlife Service.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR

THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________________________________

)

AMERICAN CHEMISTRY COUNCIL, )

)

Petitioner, )

) No. 09-1325

v. ) (consolidated with cases 09-1326,

) 09-1328, 09-1329, 09-1331,

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL ) 09-1332, 09-1333, 09-1334)

PROTECTION AGENCY, )

)

Respondent. )

____________________________________)

NON-BINDING STATEMENT OF ISSUES TO BE RAISED

Pursuant to this Court’s January 8, 2010, Order, Petitioner American Chemistry Council 

(“ACC”), hereby files its preliminary and non-binding statement of issues to be raised in the 

above-captioned case. ACC seeks review of the final rule promulgated by the U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) regarding “Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse 

Gases,” as published in the Federal Register at 74 Fed. Reg. 56,260 on October 30, 2009, a copy 

of which is Exhibit A to the Petition for Review.

ACC intends to raise the following issues in this case:

1. Whether several provisions of Subpart OO, 40 C.F.R. §§ 98.410 - 98.418, are arbitrary, 

capricious, or otherwise unlawful in that they purport to cover processes at chemical 

plants that should be covered under 40 C.F.R. Part 98, Subpart L.

2. Whether the definition of “fluorinated greenhouse gas” at 40 C.F.R. § 98.6 is arbitrary, 

capricious, or otherwise unlawful because it is overly broad.

Case: 09-1325 Document: 1229643 Filed: 02/08/2010 Page: 1
2

3. Whether several provisions of Subpart OO are arbitrary, capricious, or otherwise 

unlawful in that they do not provide a Global Warming Potential (“GWP”) for 

compounds that may become regulated outside 40 C.F.R. Part 98, Table A-1, including, 

but not limited to, compounds qualifying for the 250 metric tons CO2 per shipment 

import/export exemption.

ACC reserves the right to amend and supplement this Statement of Issues as necessary.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ David M. Friedland

David M. Friedland

Beveridge & Diamond, P.C.

1350 I Street, NW, Suite 700

Washington, DC 20005-3311

(202) 789-6047

dfriedland@bdlaw.com

Counsel for the Petitioner

American Chemistry Council

Of Counsel:

Leslie A. Hulse

American Chemistry Council

1300 Wilson Blvd.

Arlington, VA 22209

(703) 741-5165

Dated: February 8, 2010

Case: 09-1325 Document: 1229643 Filed: 02/08/2010 Page: 2
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Fifth Avenue Bank of New York et al., as Executors of Fritz G. Schmidt, Deceased. Anna D. Schmidt, Appellant; Fifth Avenue Bank of New York, as Executor of Fritz G. Schmidt, Deceased, et al., Respondents.

(Appeal No. 1.)

Ho opinion. Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ.
# C_2014052EN.01000502.xml

| 22.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 52/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 52/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 December 2013 — European Commission v Republic of Poland

(Case C-281/11) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Contained use of genetically modified micro-organisms - Directive 2009/41/EC - Incorrect and incomplete transposition)

2014/C 52/07

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: L. Pignataro Nolin and M. Owsiany-Hornung, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna and M. Szpunar, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Incorrect and incomplete transposition of Directive 2009/41/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 on the contained use of genetically modified micro-organisms (OJ 2009 L 125, p. 75).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, in failing to transpose Articles 3(3), 7, 8(2) and (3), 9(2)(a), 18(1), second subparagraph, and 18(3) and (4), of Directive 2009/41/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 on the contained use of genetically modified micro-organisms, the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, in failing to transpose Articles 3(3), 7, 8(2) and (3), 9(2)(a), 18(1), second subparagraph, and 18(3) and (4), of Directive 2009/41/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 on the contained use of genetically modified micro-organisms, the Republic of Poland has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission and the Republic of Poland to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission and the Republic of Poland to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 252, 27.8.2011.

1

---
### §421. Examination of plates and dies

The Secretary of the Treasury may examine the plates, dies, bed pieces, and other material used in the printing of Federal Reserve notes and issue regulations relating to such examinations.

(Dec. 23, 1913, ch. 6, §16 (par.), 38 Stat. 267; Pub. L. 103–325, title VI, §602(g)(6), Sept. 23, 1994, 108 Stat. 2293.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is comprised of the tenth (formerly the eleventh) par. of section 16 of act Dec. 23, 1913. For classification to this title of other pars. of section 16, see Codification note set out under section 411 of this title.

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–325, which directed general amendment of "[t]he 11th undesignated paragraph of section 16 of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 421)", was executed to this section to reflect the probable intent of Congress. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "The examination of plates, dies, bed pieces, and so forth, and regulations relating to such examination of plates, dies, and so forth, of national-bank notes provided for in section 108 of this title, is extended to include notes herein provided for."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 (UNAUDITED) AND FOR THE NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           8,508
<SECURITIES>                                   107,292
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,730
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (663)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,569
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               143,542
<PP&E>                                          47,360
<DEPRECIATION>                                (11,245)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 193,686
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,352
<BONDS>                                        145,632
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           289
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,762
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   193,686
<SALES>                                         86,704
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                86,704
<CGS>                                           60,011
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   80,798
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,729)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,088
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,548
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,325
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,223
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,223
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04
        

</TABLE>
ভেজান

পরিস্কা

দেখতে লা

হাতেও বিপজ্জ

জীবাণুগ

থাকতে পা

সাবান 

নি

আপনার 

হাত ধু

নিন! ঘষু

ধুয়ে 

ফেলু

 

শুকিয়ে

নি

CDC এই উপকােকানরি প্রস্তুে কতিরিল। CDC ফকাউতডেশন, GOJO এিং Staples এি মত্যে থকাককা একরি সহত�কাতগি দ্কািকা েযে লকাইফ ইজ দিিকাি উইথ রলিন হযেকাডেস 

(The Life is Better with Clean Hands) প্রচকািকারি�কানরি সম্ভিপি হতেতি। HHS/CDC িকারণরজযেক পণযে, পরিতেিকা, িকা দককাম্কানীতক অনুতমকােন কতি নকা।
# C_2006184EN.01000802.xml

| 8.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 184/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 184/8

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4165 — Sonae Industria/Hornitex)

(2006/C 184/09)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 28 July 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes. |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4165. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4165. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---
EXHIBIT
      23.1





CONSENT
      OF TEDDER, JAMES, WORDEN & ASSOCIATES, P.A.


CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
      (No.333-07449) on Form S-3 regarding the Dividend Reinvestment Program and
      Registration Statement (No. 333-64537) on Form S-8 regarding the Stock
      Compensation Plan of Whitemark Homes, Inc. of our report dated March 16, 2007
      related to our audit of the consolidated financial statements, which appears
      in
      this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Whitemark Homes, Inc. and Subsidiaries
      for
      the year ended December 31, 2006.





/s/
      TEDDER, JAMES, WORDEN & ASSOCIATES, P.A.




Orlando,
      Florida


March
      20,
      2007