alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-50129 

Summary Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ELISSA JO BENOIT,

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. CR-A-94-149-ALL

- - - - - - - - - -

February 21 1996

Before WIENER, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Elissa Jo Benoit appeals her 28-month sentence for making

false statements to an insured financial institution and for

making false representations regarding a social security number. 

She contends that the sentencing judge erred in calculating the

loss caused by her conduct and in determining her relevant

conduct under the Sentencing Guidelines.
No. 95-50129

-2-

We have reviewed Benoit’s brief and the record and conclude

that the sentencing judge did not commit reversible error. 

Accordingly, Benoit's sentence is AFFIRMED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Inicio 
-  Programas de Financiamiento 
-  Asistencia Por Desastre 

# Asistencia por desastre

La SBA ofrece préstamos de bajo interés por desastres para ayudar a las pequeñas empresas y propietarios de viviendas a recuperarse de los desastres declarados.

-  Solicite un préstamo por desastre de la SBASolicite asistencia por desastre (solo en inglés) 
-  Administre su préstamo por desastre de la SBAIngrese a su cuenta 
-  Incendios forestales en HawáiObtenga asistencia por desastres 
-  Huracán IdaliaObtenga asistencia por desastres 

## ¿Quién puede solicitar un préstamo por desastre de la SBA?

                - Empresas de cualquier tamaño
                - Propietarios de vivienda
                - Inquilinos
                - Organizaciones sin fines de lucro privadas

Deberá estar localizado en una área declarada como desastre y reunir otros requisitos de elegibilidad, dependiendo del tipo de préstamo.

## Cómo usar un préstamo por desastre de la SBA

                - Pérdidas no cubiertas por un seguro y/o fondos de la Agencia Federal para el Manejo de Emergencias (FEMA, por sus siglas en inglés) para uso personal y de negocios
                - Gastos operativos de su negocio que podrían haberse cubierto si el desastre no hubiese sucedido

## Tipos de préstamos por desastre

-  Préstamos por daños físicos              Préstamos para cubrir las reparaciones y la sustitución de activos físicos dañados en un desastre declarado.                  Aprenda más acerca de los préstamos por daños físicos 
-  Asistencia para reducir daños              Mayor financiación para realizar mejoras que eliminen futuros daños.                  Aprenda más acerca de la asistencia para reducir daños 
-  Préstamos EIDL              Financiación para cubrir los gastos de funcionamiento de las pequeñas empresas tras un desastre declarado.                  Aprenda más acerca del EIDL 
-  Préstamos para reservistas              Préstamos de la SBA para ayudar a pequeñas empresas elegibles con gastos operativos que compensen por empleados llamados al servicio militar activo.                  Aprenda más acerca de los préstamos para reservistas 

## Solicite ayuda por desastre

-  Vea las declaraciones de desastre              Revise si la SBA ha emitido alguna declaración de desastre en su área.                   
-  Solicite un préstamo por desastre              Los préstamos están disponibles para negocios y viviendas afectadas por desastres.                   
-  Revise su estado en línea              Entre a su cuenta en línea y revise su correo electrónico para ver actualizaciones.                   

        Solicite un préstamo por desastre
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,703,569
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              688,987,877
<ALLOWANCES>                                27,071,157
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       2,615,487
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,615,572
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             518,315,661
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                    405,683,977
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  95,163,541
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               518,315,661
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            65,475,612
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             7,587,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          26,870,984
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             15,411,644
<INCOME-TAX>                                 6,654,141
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          8,757,503
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 8,757,503
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 819 

To modernize the reporting requirement under the Telephone Consumer 

Protection Act of 1991. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 14, 2019 

Mr. MORAN (for himself and Mr. SCHATZ) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 

Transportation 

A BILL 

To modernize the reporting requirement under the Telephone 

Consumer Protection Act of 1991. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Communica5 tions Commission Reporting Modernization Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TCPA ENFORCEMENT REPORT. 

7 Section 227(h) of the Communications Act of 1934 

8 (47 U.S.C. 227(h)) is amended to read as follows: 

9 ‘‘(h) TCPA ENFORCEMENT REPORT.—The Commis10 sion shall submit an annual report to Congress regarding 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 819 IS

1 the enforcement during the preceding year of laws, regula2 tions, and policies relating to robocalls and spoofed calls, 

3 which report shall include— 

4 ‘‘(1) the number of complaints received by the 

5 Commission during the year alleging that a con6 sumer received a robocall or spoofed call; 

7 ‘‘(2) the number of citations issued by the Com8 mission pursuant to section 503 during the year to 

9 enforce any law, regulation, or policy relating to a 

10 robocall or spoofed call; 

11 ‘‘(3) the number of notices of apparent liability 

12 issued by the Commission pursuant to section 503 

13 during the year to enforce any law, regulation, or 

14 policy relating to a robocall or spoofed call; and 

15 ‘‘(4) for each notice referred to in paragraph 

16 (3)— 

17 ‘‘(A) the amount of the proposed forfeiture 

18 penalty involved; 

19 ‘‘(B) the person to whom the notice was 

20 issued; and 

21 ‘‘(C) the status of the proceeding.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 54 (Monday, March 21, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 15305]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6488]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. IN11-2-000]


Moussa I. Kourouma d/b/a Quntum Energy LLC; Notice of Designation 
of Commission Staff as Non-Decisional

March 14, 2011.
    With respect to an order issued by the Commission on February 14, 
2011 in the above-captioned docket, staff of the Office of Enforcement 
(OE), are designated as non-decisional in deliberations by the 
Commission in this docket. Accordingly, pursuant to 18 CFR 385.2202 
(2010), they will not serve as advisors to the Commission or take part 
in the Commission's review of any offer of settlement. Likewise, as 
non-decisional staff, pursuant to 18 CFR 385.2201 (2010), they are 
prohibited from communicating with advisory staff concerning any 
deliberations in this docket.

    Dated: March 14, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-6488 Filed 3-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
1 Circuit Judge of the Eighth Circuit, sitting by

designation.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 96-31226

UNIROYAL CHEMICAL COMPANY, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

DELTECH CORP.; ET AL.,

Defendants,

SAFEWAY TRANSPORTATION, INC.; TMI ENTERPRISE, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

January 8, 1999

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion November 10, 1998, 5th Cir. 1998, ______F.3d_____) 

Before MAGILL,1 SMITH, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges

DeMOSS, Circuit Judge:

Construing the Suggestion for Rehearing en Banc of DefendantsAppellees Safeway Transportation, Inc., and TMI Enterprises, Inc.,

as a Petition for Panel Rehearing, we conclude that the petition is

due to be GRANTED-IN-PART as follows. The last sentence in the

introduction is revised from “We vacate the district court’s
2

judgment and remand this action for entry of judgment in favor of

Uniroyal,” to read “We vacate the district court’s judgment and

remand this action for further proceedings consistent with this

opinion.” Also, the last sentence in the opinion’s conclusion is

revised from “Based on the foregoing, we VACATE the judgment of the

district court granting summary judgment to the defendants, and

REMAND to the district court for entry of judgment in favor of

Uniroyal as to CERCLA liability, and such further proceedings as to

damages as may be required,” to read “Based on the foregoing, we

VACATE the judgment of the district court granting summary judgment

to the defendants, and REMAND to the district court for further

proceedings consistent with this opinion.” Other than those two

modifications, our opinion remains unchanged.
The Attorney General of Texas 

December 14, 1978 

JOHN L. HILL 

Attorney General 

supreme CO”” Building 

P.O. BOX 1.2548 

Austin, TX. 78711 

51*,4x-2501 

Mr. Don R. Stiles 

Executive Director 

Texas Adult Probation Commission 

P. 0. Box 12427 

Austin, Texas 78701 

Opinion No. H- 12 8 3 

Re: Authority of the Adult 

Probation Commission to provide 

assistance for supervision of 

persons on pre-trial bond. 

Dear Mr. Stiles: 

You have asked if the Texas Adult Probation Commission may provide 

state aid to judicial districts to be used by probation departments for 

supervision of persons released from custody on pre-trial bond and pre-trial 

diversion programs. 

The Texas Adult Probation Commission is created by article 42.121, 

Code of Criminal Procedure. The purpose of the commission is 

to make probation services available throughout the 

state, to improve the effectiveness of probation 

services, to provide alternatives to incarceration by 

providing financial aid to judicial districts for the 

establishment and improvement of probation services 

and community-based correctional programs and 

facilities other than jails or prisons, and to establish 

uniform probation administration standards. 

Section 1.01. The commission is empowered to provide financial assistance to 

judicial districts for these purposes. Section 4.01. The money appropriated by 

the legislature for this purpose is required to be the amount necessary to 

maintain and improve state-wide probation services. Section 4.02. The 

commission is authorized to cooperate with other governmental agencies “to 

improve probation services. ” Section 3.04. It may apply for ,snd accept gifts 

or grants for use in “maintaining and improving probation services.” Section 

3.03. 

The powers and duties of the commission are all cast in terms of 

probation, which is a post-trial procedure. Code Crim. Proc. arts. 42.12, g 2; 

42.13, S 2. Accordingly, we do not believe that under present law the 

commission has authority to fund a pre-trial release program. 

P. 5066 
Mr. Don R. Stiles - Page 2 (H-1283) 

SUMMARY 

The Texas Adult Probation Commission does not have 

authority under present law to provide financial assistance 

to pre-trial release programs. 

Attorney General of Texas 

APPROVED: // 

Opinion Committee 

P. 5067
# C_2011269EN.01002001.xml

| 10.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/20

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Bergamo lodged on 1 April 2011 — Procura della Repubblica v Ibrahim Music

(Case C-156/11)

2011/C 269/36

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale di Bergamo

Party to the main proceedings

Party to the main proceedings

Ibrahim Music

By order of 21 June 2011 the Court of Justice removed the case from the register.

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Inicio 
-  Encuentre Ayuda Local 
-  Asistencia Para La Contratación Federal 

## Section navigation

-  Recursos asociados 
-  Asistencia para la exportación y el comercio 
-  Asistencia para la contratación federal 
-  Los navegadores comunitarios 
-  Agrupaciones regionales de innovación 
-  Oficiales de desarrollo de negocios de veteranos 

# Asistencia para la contratación federal

----

## Contenido

----

## Aceleradoras APEX para pequeñas empresas

Las aceleradoras APEX para pequeñas empresas (conocidos anteriormente como Centros de asistencia técnica para adquisiciones o PTAC, por sus siglas en inglés) proporciona asistencia técnica a empresas interesadas en vender productos o servicios a gobiernos federales, estatales y locales. Además, las aceleradoras APEX pueden ayudar a que con su pequeña empresa: 
                  - determine si está lista para la contratación
                  - se registre en los lugares adecuados
                  - verifique si es elegible para obtener certificaciones para pequeñas empresas
                  - investigue oportunidades en contratos anteriores

##         Encuentre su aceleradora APEX más cercana      

Introduzca un código postal válido de cinco dígitos.

## Representantes de centros de adquisiciones

Los representantes de centros de adquisiciones (PCR, por sus siglas en inglés, contenido solo en inglés) ayudan a las pequeñas empresas que están tratando de ganar contratos federales. Los PCR analizan muchas estrategias federales de gestión de adquisiciones antes de que se anuncien, lo que les permite influir en las oportunidades que deben reservarse para las pequeñas empresas.  

Los PCR también: 
                  - ayudan a implementar las normas y programas de la SBA 
                  - llevan a cabo investigaciones de mercado 
                  - asisten a las pequeñas empresas con problemas de pago 
                  - proporcionan asesoramiento sobre el trámite de contratación   

## Representantes comerciales

Los representantes comerciales (CMR, por sus siglas en inglés), trabajan para garantizar que las pequeñas empresas reciban la máxima oportunidad posible de participar como subcontratistas federales.  

Los CMR evalúan el desempeño de contratistas federales fuera del ámbito de los de “pequeña escala” para garantizar que cumplan con las metas y objetivos dentro de sus planes de subcontratación de pequeñas empresas. Les proporcionan capacitación a agencias federales y a otros contratistas que no se consideran como de “pequeña escala” sobre planes de subcontratación y sus requisitos de presentación de informes. 

Encuentre a un representante comercial en su área para obtener asistencia general con la subcontratación.
I am unique,
I am Latina,
I can reach my goals.
Exhibit 10.20





Description of Arrangements Relating to Travel Compensation


for Michael R. Elia and Thomas P. Finn





The Management Development and Compensation Committee of Gerber Scientific, Inc. (the “Company”) has clarified the Company’s arrangements for providing temporary housing, airfare and car rental assistance to Michael R. Elia, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Thomas P. Finn, Senior Vice President Global Operations, which arrangements were originally set forth in the letter agreements with such officers entered into on March 14, 2008 and January 22, 2010, respectively.  The Committee, upon deliberation of the relevant facts and circumstances, including the distance from the personal residence of each officer to such officer’s principal place of business, has authorized such officers to continue to receive temporary housing, airfare and car rental benefits until December 31, 2012, with respect to Mr. Elia, and until February 15, 2011, with respect to Mr. Finn.  The Committee also has approved the provision of a tax gross-up to each of Messrs. Elia and Finn to compensate such officers for any federal income taxes payable by such officers with respect to these benefits.  The tax gross-up also will terminate upon the dates set forth above.
# C_2011030EN.01005301.xml

| 29.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/53

---

Action brought on 29 November 2010 — Biodes v OHIM — Manasul Internacional (FARMASUL)

(Case T-553/10)

()

2011/C 30/94

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Biodes S.L. (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: E. Manresa Medina, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Manasul Internacional S.L. (Ponferrada, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 3 September 2010 in Case R 1034/2009-1, and |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 3 September 2010 in Case R 1034/2009-1, and

| — | order the defendant and any interveners to pay all the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant and any interveners to pay all the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark ‘FARMASUL’ for goods in Classes 5, 30 and 31.

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Manasul Internacional S.L.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: National figurative marks ‘MANASUL’ and ‘MANASUL ORO’ for goods in Classes 5, 30 and 31.

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition rejected and mark applied for granted.

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal upheld and mark applied for refused.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (1) since there is no similarity between the marks at issue, that the opponent has forgotten to examine the second licence agreement which amended the first licence agreement, and that the opposing mark’s alleged reputation is nonexistent.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

1

---
----

**SECURITIES      AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION**

**Washington,      D.C. 20549**

**FORM      8-K**

**CURRENT      REPORT**

**Pursuant      to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934**

**Progenics      Pharmaceuticals, Inc.**

| Delaware                                                                                        |   | **000-23143**                          |   | **13-3379479**                                                 |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
| (State                or other jurisdictionof                incorporation)                     |   | (CommissionFile                Number) |   | (IRS                EmployerIdentification                No.) |
|                                                                                            |   |                                   |   |                                                           |
| 777                Old Saw Mill River Road, Tarrytown, New York                                 |   | 10591                                  |
| (Address                of principal executive offices)                                         |   | (Zip                Code)              |
| Registrant's                telephone number, including area code (914)                789-2800 |

*see *

----

**Item      7.01. Regulation FD Disclosure**

**Item      9.01   Financial Statements and Exhibits.**

**Exhibit      No.**
**Description**

----

**SIGNATURES**

|   | By:  /s/                ROBERT A.                MCKINNEY                             |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----