Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 55 / Tuesday, March 22, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 15855 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by May 23, 2011. Filing a 

petition for reconsideration by the 

Administrator of this final rule does not 

affect the finality of this action for the 

purposes of judicial review, nor does it 

extend the time within which a petition 

for judicial review may be filed, and 

shall not postpone the effectiveness of 

such rule or action. This action may not 

be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, NSR Reform, 

Greenhouse gases, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Dated: March 7, 2011. 

Karl Brooks, 

Regional Administrator, Region 7. 

40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: 

PART 52—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42. U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart CC—Nebraska 

■ 2. Section 52.1420(c) under ‘‘Title 

129—Nebraska Air Quality Regulations’’ 

is amended as follows: 

■ a. Revise the entries for 129–1, 129– 

14, 129–15, 129–17, and 129–19. 

■ b. Add a new entry for 129–2. 

The revisions and additions read as 

follows: 

§ 52.1420 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

EPA-APPROVED NEBRASKA REGULATIONS

Nebraska citation Title State effective 

date EPA approval date Explanation 

*******

Title 129—Nebraska Air Quality Regulations 

129–1 ................ Definitions ..................................... 01/09/2011 03/22/2011 [Insert citation of publication].

129–2 ................ Definition of Major Source ............ 03/14/2006 03/22/2011 [Insert citation of publication].

* * * * * * * 

129–14 .............. Permits: Public Participation ......... 02/06/2008 03/22/2011 [Insert citation of publication].

129–15 .............. Permit Revisions; Reopening for 

Cause.

02/06/2008 03/22/2011 [Insert citation of publication].

* * * * * * * 

129–17 .............. Construction Permits—When Required.02/06/2008 03/22/2011 [Insert citation of publication].Approval does not include Nebraska’s revisions to sections 

001.02T and 013.04T pertaining 

to ethanol production facilities, 

which were not submitted by 

the State. 

129–19 .............. Prevention of Significant Deterioration of Air Quality.02/06/2008 03/22/2011 [Insert citation of publication].

* * * * * * * 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2011–6419 Filed 3–21–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–HQ–OAR–2005–0161; FRL–9284–2] 

40 CFR Part 80 

Denial of Petitions for Reconsideration 

of Regulation of Fuels and Fuel 

Additives: Changes to Renewable Fuel 

Standard Program 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice of denial of petitions for 

reconsideration. 

SUMMARY: On May 24, 2010, the Clean 

Air Task Force (CATF), the National 

Wildlife Federation, the World Wildlife 

Fund and the Friends of the Earth 

petitioned the Administrator to 

reconsider an EPA rule, published on 

March 26, 2010 (75 FR 14670), which 

amended the Renewable Fuel Standard 

Program pursuant to Clean Air Act 

section 211(o). The petitioners alleged 

that EPA failed to properly require 

producers of renewable fuels to verify 

domestic crops and crop residues used 

to produce the renewable fuels 

complied with the applicable land use 

restrictions. Additionally, the CATF 

alleged that EPA did not properly 

account for the ‘‘global rebound effect’’ 

in the final analysis of the lifecycle 

greenhouse gas (GHG) emission impacts 

of renewable fuel production and use. 

On February 17, 2011, the 

Administrator denied the petitions for 

reconsideration and the accompanying 

requests for stays in implementing the 

regulations. This Notice announces the 

availability of EPA’s decision. 

DATES: EPA’s denials of the petitions to 

reconsider were issued by letters dated 

February 17, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul 

Argyropoulos in the EPA’s Office of 


Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES
15856 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 55 / Tuesday, March 22, 2011 / Rules and Regulations 

Transportation and Air Quality at (202) 

564–1123 or 

argyropoulos.paul@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 

24, 2010, the Clean Air Task Force 

(CATF), the National Wildlife 

Federation, the World Wildlife Fund 

and the Friends of the Earth petitioned 

the Administrator to reconsider an EPA 

rule, published on March 26, 2010 (75 

FR 14670), which amended the 

Renewable Fuel Standard Program. This 

amendment (commonly referred to as 

RFS2) was adopted in response to Clean 

Air Act Section 211(o) as amended by 

the Energy Independence and Security 

Act of 2007 (EISA). The petitioners 

alleged that EPA failed to properly 

require producers of renewable fuels to 

verify domestic crops and crop residues 

used to produce the renewable fuels 

complied with the land use restrictions 

in EISA. The petitioners other than 

CATF requested a stay of the aggregate 

compliance portion of the RFS2 rules. 

Additionally, the CATF alleged that in 

this rule, EPA did not properly account 

for the ‘‘global rebound effect’’ in the 

final analysis of the lifecycle greenhouse 

gas (GHG) emission impacts of 

renewable fuel production and use. 

CATF requested a stay of the entire 

RFS2 final rule. 

The EPA considers the lifecycle GHG 

emission assessment of renewable fuels 

and the land use restrictions applicable 

to renewable biomass provisions to be 

important parts of the RFS2 program 

and carefully reviewed the arguments 

and information provided by the 

petitioners on these two issues. On 

February 17, 2011, the Administrator 

responded by denying the petitions to 

reconsider. The EPA also denied all 

requests for a stay of implementation of 

the RFS2 regulations. The letters of 

denial and the supporting rationale have 

been posted on the EPA Web site at: 

http://www.epa.gov/otaq/fuels/ 

renewablefuels/notices.htm. 

Dated: March 14, 2011. 

Margo Tsirigotis Oge, 

Director, Office of Transportation and Air 

Quality, Office of Air and Radiation. 

[FR Doc. 2011–6561 Filed 3–21–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

GENERAL SERVICES 

ADMINISTRATION 

41 CFR Part 105–735 

[GSA Case 2011–01; Docket 2011–0007; 

Sequence 1] 

RIN 3090–AJ10 

Standards of Conduct 

AGENCY: General Services 

Administration (GSA). 

ACTION: Final Rule. 

SUMMARY: The General Services 

Administration (GSA) is removing a part 

from the Code of Federal Regulations 

because it no longer provides employees 

with guidance on employee standards of 

conduct. 

DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is 

effective March 22, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Eugenia D. Ellison, Office of General 

Counsel, General Services 

Administration, 1275 First Street, NE., 

Room 528, Washington, DC 20417, (202) 

501–0765, FAX (202) 208–0085. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

A. Background 

The General Services Administration 

(GSA) published a final rule at 61 FR 

56399, November 1, 1995 which 

codified GSA’s supplemental standards 

of ethical conduct in the new 5 CFR part 

6701. At that time, GSA removed from 

the CFR its old standards of conduct, 

which had been codified at 41 CFR part 

105–735 and provided a number of 

cross-references to the new 

Government-wide standards of ethical 

conduct regulations and GSA’s new 

supplemental regulations. GSA is 

removing part 105–735 because the 

cross-reference to the GSA Order is no 

longer applicable and employees are 

familiar with the remaining crossreferenced provisions and no longer 

refer to 41 CFR part 105–735 for 

guidance on employee standards of 

conduct. 

B. Administrative Procedure Act 

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b) and (d), 

GSA has determined that good cause 

exists for waiving the general notice of 

proposed rulemaking and 30-day delay 

in effectiveness as to these minor 

revisions. This action is being taken 

because this rule concerns matters of 

agency organization, practice and 

procedure and merely serves to remove 

a part of the Code of Federal Regulations 

which no longer provides guidance to 

GSA employees. 

C. Executive Order 12866 and 13563 

GSA has determined that this final 

rule is not a significant rule for the 

purposes of Executive Order 12866, 

Regulatory Planning and Review, dated 

September 30, 1993. 

In accordance with Executive Order 

13563, Improving Regulation and 

Regulatory Review, dated January 18, 

2011, GSA determined that this rule is 

not excessively burdensome to the 

public, and is consistent with 5 U.S.C. 

7301. 

D. Regulatory Flexibility Act 

GSA has determined under the 

Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 

et seq.) that this rulemaking will not 

have significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

because it relates solely to agency 

management and personnel. 

E. Paperwork Reduction Act 

The Paperwork Reduction Act does 

not apply because this rulemaking does 

not impose recordkeeping or 

information collection requirements, or 

the collection of information from 

offerors, contractors, or members of the 

public that require the approval of the 

Office of Management and Budget under 

44 U.S.C. chapter 35. 

F. Small Business Regulatory 

Enforcement Fairness Act 

This final rule is also exempt from 

congressional review prescribed under 5 

U.S.C. 801 since it relates solely to 

agency management and personnel. 

List of Subjects in 41 CFR Part 105–735 

Conflict of interests, Ethical 

standards, Executive branch standards 

of conduct. Government Employees. 

Dated: February 1, 2011. 

Martha Johnson, 

Administrator of General Services. 

Accordingly, under the authority of 5 

U.S.C. 7301 and for the reasons set forth 

in the preamble, the General Services 

Administration is amending title 41, 

chapter 105, of the Code of Federal 

Regulations by removing part 105–735. 

[FR Doc. 2011–6608 Filed 3–21–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6820–FM–P 


Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with RULES