alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
April 6, 2000

Board  of  Directors
Allianz  Life  Insurance  Company  of  North  America
1750  Hennepin  Avenue
Minneapolis,  MN  55403-2195

RE:   Opinion  and Consent of Counsel
      Allianz Life Variable Account B

Dear  Sir  or  Madam:

You have requested our Opinion of Counsel in connection with the filing with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission  pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, of a Post-Effective  Amendment to a Registration  Statement on Form N-4
for the Individual  Flexible Payment Variable Annuity  Contracts to be issued by
Allianz  Life  Insurance  Company of North  America  and its  separate  account,
Allianz Life Variable Account B.

We  are  of  the  following  opinions:

     1. Allianz Life Variable  Account B is a unit investment trust as that term
is defined in Section  4(2) of the  Investment  Company Act of 1940 (the "Act"),
and is  currently  registered  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission,
pursuant to Section 8(a) of the Act.

     2. Upon the  acceptance  of  purchase  payments  made by a  Contract  Owner
pursuant to a Contract issued in accordance with the Prospectus contained in the
Registration  Statement and upon compliance with applicable law, such a Contract
Owner  will  have  a  legally-issued,   fully-paid,  non-assessable  contractual
interest under such Contract.

You  may  use  this  opinion  letter,  or  copy  hereof,  as an  exhibit  to the
Registration Statement.

We  consent to the  reference  to our Firm under the  caption  "Legal  Opinions"
contained in the Statement of Additional  Information  which forms a part of the
Registration Statement.

                              Sincerely,

                              BLAZZARD,  GRODD  &  HASENAUER,  P.C.


                              By: /s/ LYNN KORMAN STONE
                                  ------------------------
                                      Lynn  Korman  Stone
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ No. 04-50688

_____________________

Consolidated with 04-51043

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

CESAR EDUARDO CAMARILLO-RODRIGUEZ

Defendant - Appellant

--------------------- Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (03-CR-2066)

--------------------- Before GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

IT IS ORDERED that the Appellee’s unopposed motion to vacate

the sentence is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Appellee’s unopposed motion

to remand the case to the Unit ed States District Court for the

Western District of Texas, El Paso Div ision for resentencing is

granted.

___________________

*Pursuant to 5 th Cir. R. 47. 5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 th Cir. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## F I L E D April 5, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkIT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Appe llee’s unopposed

alternative motion to extend time to file Ap pellee’s brief until

fourteen (14) days from t he court’s denial of the Appellee’s

motion to vacate and motion to remand is moot.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOUND IN THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> CANADIAN
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                 0.7305
<CASH>                                          34,244
<SECURITIES>                                     6,818
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,408
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     74,562
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               129,497
<PP&E>                                         462,265
<DEPRECIATION>                                  39,420
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 565,236
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           62,434
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       375,957
<OTHER-SE>                                      79,894
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   565,236
<SALES>                                         51,049
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                51,049
<CGS>                                           42,029
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   48,786
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (767)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,224
<INCOME-TAX>                                       895
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,356
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,356
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01<F1>
<FN>
<F1>USING US GAAP NET INCOME AND SFAS 128, BASIC AND DILUTED EPS ARE BOTH $0.01.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
§ 16.79 Exemption of Pardon Attorney System. ( a ) The following system of records is exempt from 5 U.S.C. 552a, subsections (c)(3), (c)(4), (d)(1), (d)(2), (d)(3), (d)(4), and (e)(5): Executive Clemency Case Files/Executive Clemency Tracking System (JUSTICE/OPA-001). These exemptions apply only to the extent that information in this system of records is subject to exemption pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2).
( b ) Exemption from the particular subsections is justified for the following reasons: ( 1 ) From subsection (c)(3) because: ( i ) The purpose of the creation and maintenance of the Executive Clemency Case Files/Executive Clemency Tracking System (JUSTICE/OPA-001) is to enable the Justice Department to prepare reports and recommendations to the President for his ultimate decisions on clemency matters, which are committed to exclusive discretion of the President pursuant to Article II, Section 2, Clause 1 of the Constitution.
( ii ) Release of the disclosure accounting, for disclosures pursuant to the routine uses published for this system, would permit the requester to obtain valuable information concerning the nature and scope of a clemency investigation, invade the right of candid and confidential communications among officials concerned with making recommendations to the President in clemency matters, and disclose the identity of persons who furnished information to the Government under an express or implied promise that their identities would be held in confidence.
( 2 ) From subsection (c)(4) because the exemption from subsections (d)(1), (d)(2), (d)(3), and (d)(4) will make notification of disputes inapplicable.
( 3 ) From subsections (d)(1), (d)(2), (d)(3), and (d)(4) is justified for the reasons stated in paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
( 4 ) From subsection (e)(5) is justified for the reasons stated in paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
[Order No. 005-2003, 68 FR 4929, Jan. 31, 2003]
#### § 104.6 Amendments to this part.

All claims will be processed in accordance with the current provisions of this part.
EXHIBIT 31.1

                            SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Frederic M. Zinn, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of WOM, Inc.

2.    Based upon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report.

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
      information included in this report, fairly present in all material
      respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
      the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.    I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
      procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for
      the registrant and have:

      (a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
            disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my
            supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
            registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
            to me by others within those entities, particularly during the
            period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
            and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the
            effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the
            end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
            and

      (c)   disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
            control over financial reporting that occurred during the
            registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth
            quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
            affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
            registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5.    I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control
      over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
      committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
      equivalent functions):

      (a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
            or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
            reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
            record, process, summarize and report financial information; and


<PAGE>

      (b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
            other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
            internal controls over financial reporting.


Dated: February 13, 2006


/s/ Frederic M. Zinn
------------------------
    Frederic M. Zinn
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 49 (Monday, March 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13696-13697]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5934]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]


Admiralty Holding Co., American Consolidated Management Group, 
Inc., DnC Multimedia Corp., Dorsey Trailers, Inc. (n/k/a DT 
Liquidation, Inc.), and ElectraCapital, Inc. (a/k/a Electra Capital, 
Inc.); Order of Suspension of Trading

March 10, 2011.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
Admiralty Holding Co. because it has not filed any periodic reports 
since the period ended September 30, 2006.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
American Consolidated Management Group, Inc. because it has not filed 
any periodic

[[Page 13697]]

reports since the period ended March 31, 2006.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
DnC Multimedia Corp. because it has not filed any periodic reports 
since the period ended December 31, 2007.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
Dorsey Trailers, Inc. (n/k/a DT Liquidation, Inc.) because it has not 
filed any periodic reports since the period ended July 1, 2000.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
ElectraCapital, Inc. (a/k/a Electra Capital, Inc.) because it has not 
filed any periodic reports since the period ended September 30, 2003.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the 
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the 
securities of the above-listed companies. Therefore, it is ordered, 
pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that 
trading in the securities of the above-listed companies is suspended 
for the period from 9:30 a.m. EST on March 10, 2011, through 11:59 p.m. 
EDT on March 23, 2011.

    By the Commission.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-5934 Filed 3-10-11; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. FDA-2011-N-0109]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is providing notice of exchange of letters between Dr. Murray M. Lumpkin, Deputy Commissioner, International and Special Programs, FDA and Mr. Martin Heraghty, Assistant Secretary General, Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (DAFF), concerning certification requirements for caseins, caseinates, and mixtures thereof exported from Ireland to the United States.

The mutual goals of FDA and DAFF in establishing certification requirements for caseins, caseinates, and mixtures thereof exported from Ireland to the United States are to assure that contaminated products will not be imported into the United States and to minimize the need for extensive FDA audit sampling of these products from Ireland. DAFF and FDA have a history of cooperation on this issue and it is, therefore, desirable that the two Agencies continue to cooperate to maintain and improve consumer protection.

# DATES:

The agreement became effective November 10, 2010.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        David P. Kelly, Office of International Programs, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 31, rm. 3404, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-8373,                         *Fax:*                         301-595-7941.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with 21 CFR 20.108(c), which states that all written agreements and understandings between FDA and others shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    , the Agency is publishing notice of this agreement.                

Dated: March 10, 2011.

Leslie Kux,

Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.

      ( print page 14408)          ( print page 14409)          ( print page 14410)          ( print page 14411)          ( print page 14412)          ( print page 14413)    

BILLING CODE 4160-01-P

[FR Doc. 2011-6079 Filed 3-15-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-C
HomeLatest FilingsPrevious Page

    - SEC Home  »
    - Search the Next-Generation EDGAR System  »
    - Company Search  »
    - Current Page

225 PICTORIA DRIVE SUITE 450CINCINNATI OH 45246         

225 PICTORIA DRIVE SUITE 450CINCINNATI OH 45246         2126679131

Nomura Alternative Income Fund CIK#: 0001944664 (see all company filings)
State location: OH | State of Inc.: **DE** | Fiscal Year End: 0430Get **insider transactions** for this **issuer**.File Number: **812-15439**

||
||
### SUBCHAPTER II—SPECIAL PROJECTS ON FEDERAL LAND
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Aurizon Mines Ltd. (the Company) is filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, its annual report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (the Report).

I, Ian S. Walton, Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(i)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Ian S. Walton

Ian S. Walton 
Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer

April 2, 2007
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) AND RULE
15d-14(a)

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18

OF THE UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Quotemedia, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Keith J. Randall, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to my best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ Keith J. Randall   
|    |  | Keith J. Randall       
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer
|    |  | May 15, 2008
### **CHAPTER 31—DESTRUCTION OF PROPERTY MOVING IN COMMERCE**
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7619

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TROY R. SAUNDERS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District

Judge. (CR-97-344)

Submitted: February 6, 2003 Decided: February 12, 2003

Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Troy R. Saunders, Appellant Pro Se. William Neil Hammerstrom, Jr.,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Troy R. Saunders appeals the district court’s order denying

his motion to compel specific performance and granting the

Government’s motion to withdraw a previously filed motion for

sentence reduction under Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b). We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Saunders,

No. CR-97-344 (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 7, 2002 & entered Oct. 8, 2002).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
NOTE: Pursuant to Fed. Cir. R. 47.6, this disposition is not citable as precedent. It is a public record.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

05-3312

MARIJA HUGHES,

Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

Respondent.

__________ ________________

DECIDED: October 10, 2006

__________________________

Before MAYER, Circuit Judge , FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge , and GAJARSA, Circuit Judge

.

PER CURIAM.

Marija Hughes appeals from the final decis ion of the Merit Systems Protection

Board, which sustained t he arbitrator’s decision u pholding her removal. Hughes v.

Dep’t of Labor , No. CB7121040020-V-1 (MSPB June 6, 2005). With respect to the

issues properly raised on appeal, we affirm on the basis of the board’s opinion.
### §228a. Enlargement of boundaries; statement of purpose

It is the object of sections 228a to 228j of this title to provide for the recognition by Congress that the entire Grand Canyon, from the mouth of the Paria River to the Grand Wash Cliffs, including tributary side canyons and surrounding plateaus, is a natural feature of national and international significance. Congress therefore recognizes the need for, and in sections 228a to 228j of this title provides for, the further protection and interpretation of the Grand Canyon in accordance with its true significance.

(Pub. L. 93–620, §2, Jan. 3, 1975, 88 Stat. 2089.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

For short title of sections 228a to 228j of this title as the "Grand Canyon National Park Enlargement Act", see Short Title note set out under section 221 of this title.
#### Mona Giovanni, Respondent, v James Moran, Doing Business as Cabinet Emporium, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 911]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages based on breach of contract, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Lally, J), entered September 7, 2005, as denied his cross motion for leave to renew his prior motion to vacate a judgment entered upon his default in appearing or answering.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

*734The court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s cross motion for leave to renew because he failed to present “new facts” which were unavailable at the time of the original motion and which would change the prior determination (see CPLR 2221 [e]; *Town House St., LLC v New Fellowship Full Gospel Baptist Church, Inc.,*29 AD3d 894; *Matter of Rush v County of Nassau,*24 AD3d 560, 561 [2005]; *Almonte v Western Beef, Inc., 21*AD3d 516, 516-517 [2005]; *Johnson v Marquez, 2*AD3d 786, 788-789 [2003]). Adams, J.P., Krausman, Rivera and Lifson, JJ., concur.