alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 0

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 0 appear at 73 FR 73 FR 54947, Sept. 24, 2008.

#### § 0.153 Selection and assignment of employees for training.

The Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Director of the Bureau of Prisons, the Commissioner of Federal Prison Industries, Inc., the Commissioner of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, the Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration, the Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, the Director of the Office of Justice Assistance, Research and Statistics, the Director of the Executive Office for United States Attorneys and the Director of the United States Marshals Service, as to their respective jurisdictions, and the Assistant Attorney General for Administration, as to all other organizational units of the Department, are hereby authorized to exercise the authority vested in the Attorney General by 5 U.S.C. 4109, with respect to the selection and assignment of employees for training by, in, or through Government facilities and the payment or reimbursement of expenses for such training.

[Order No. 960-81, 46 FR 52351, Oct. 27, 1981, as amended by Order No. 2650-2003, 68 FR 4928, Jan. 31, 2003]
#### § 34.110 Management of peer reviews.

A technical support contractor may assist in managing the peer review process.
### §9048. Temporary Government in the Sunshine Act relief

#### (a) In general

Except as provided in subsection (b), notwithstanding any other provision of law, if the Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System determines, in writing, that unusual and exigent circumstances exist, the Board may conduct meetings without regard to the requirements of section 552b of title 5 during the period beginning on March 27, 2020, and ending on the earlier of—

(1) the date on which the national emergency concerning the novel coronavirus disease (COVID–19) outbreak declared by the President on March 13, 2020 under the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) terminates; or

(2) December 31, 2020.

#### (b) Records

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System shall keep a record of all Board votes and the reasons for such votes during the period described in subsection (a).

(Pub. L. 116–136, div. A, title IV, §4009, Mar. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 478.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The National Emergencies Act, referred to in subsec. (a)(1), is Pub. L. 94–412, Sept. 14, 1976, 90 Stat. 1255, which is classified principally to chapter 34 (§1601 et seq.) of Title 50, War and National Defense. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1601 of Title 50 and Tables.
#### Clarissa M. Bast *v.*Edward C. Bast.

1. *Divorce—desertion no excuse for adultery.*The fact that a husband has deserted his wife, or been guilty of drunkenness or cruelty, is not a sufficient recriminatory defense to a bill by him for a divorce for adultery ■ on the part of the wife.

3. *Same—direct proof of adultery not required.*Adultery may be shown, a bill for divorce, by proof-of circumstances that naturally lead the mind to its belief by a fair inference as a necessary conclusion. Direct proof of the fact is not indispensable.

*585Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Samuel M. Moore, Judge, presiding.

Messrs. Bonfield, Swezey & Smith, for the appellant.

Messrs. Hawes & Lawrence, for the appellee.

Mr. Justice Breese

delivered the opinion of the Court:

The grounds alleged for reversing the decree in this case are, that the decree is not sustained by the evidence, and that appellee himself had deserted his wife, giving to her the right to claim a divorce from him. We do not think his desertion can exonerate the wife from the more serious charge of adultery. Neither that, nor drunkenness, nor cruelty, will, under our statute, constitute a sufficient recriminatory defense to a charge of adultery. Had appellee been guilty of a like offense, he could not claim a divorce.

As to the testimony in all such cases it must generally be circumstantial. The fact of adultery is to be inferred from circumstances that naturally lead to it by a fair inference as a necessary conclusion. The direct fact of adultery can seldom, or ever, he proved. We think sufficient facts were proved in this case “to lead the minds of reasonable and just men” to the conclusion established by the verdict, and we have no disposition to disturb it;

The decree must be affirmed.

*Decree affirmed.*
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Donald G. Barnhart, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of GoAmerica, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controlsand procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; 

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and 

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;and 

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions): 

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant rolein the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: May 15, 2008

 

|    | /s/ Donald G. Barnhart                                                           |
|--------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|         | Donald G. Barnhart      Senior Vice President      (Principal Financial Officer) |

 

----
### §8321. Authority to define terms

#### (a) Authority to define terms

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission may adopt a rule to define—

(1) the term "commercial risk"; and

(2) any other term included in an amendment to the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1 et seq.) made by this subtitle.

#### (b) Modification of definitions

To include transactions and entities that have been structured to evade this subtitle (or an amendment made by this subtitle), the Commodity Futures Trading Commission shall adopt a rule to further define the terms "swap", "swap dealer", "major swap participant", and "eligible contract participant".

(Pub. L. 111–203, title VII, §721(b), (c), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 1670.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subtitle, referred to in text, is subtitle A (§§711–754) of title VII of Pub. L. 111–203, July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 1641, which enacted this subchapter, section 78c–2 of this title, and sections 1b, 6b–1, 6r to 6t, 7b–3, 24a, and 26 of Title 7, Agriculture, amended sections 78f, 78o, and 78s of this title, sections 1a, 2, 6 to 6b, 6c, 6d, 6m, 6q, 6s, 7 to 7b, 8 to 9a, 12, 12a, 13, 13–1, 13a–1, 13b, 15, 16, 21, 24, 25, 27 to 27b, 27e, and 27f of Title 7, section 761 of Title 11, Bankruptcy, and sections 4421 and 4422 of Title 12, Banks and Banking, enacted provisions set out as notes under sections 1a, 2, 6a, 7a–1, 7a–3, and 9 of Title 7, and amended provisions set out as a note under section 78c of this title. For complete classification of subtitle A to the Code, see Tables.

The Commodity Exchange Act, referred to in subsec. (a)(2), is act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 369, 42 Stat. 998, which is classified generally to chapter 1 (§1 et seq.) of Title 7, Agriculture. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 1 of Title 7 and Tables.

#### Codification

Section is comprised of subsecs. (b) and (c) of section 721 of Pub. L. 111–203, which were redesignated as subsecs. (a) and (b), respectively, of this section for purposes of codification.
EXHIBIT
        23.2
 
 CONSENT
        OF TEDDER, JAMES, WORDEN & ASSOCIATES, P.A.
 --------------------------------------------------------
 CONSENT
        OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 We
        consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration
        Statement(No.333-07449) on Form S-3 regarding the Dividend Reinvestment Program
        and Registration Statement(No.333-64537) on Form S-8 regarding the Stock
        Compensation Plan of Whitemark Homes, Inc. of our report dated March 16,
        2007
        related to our audit of the consolidated financial statements, which appears
        in
        this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Whitemark Homes, Inc. and Subsidiaries
        for
        the year ended December 31, 2007.
 
 /s/
        TEDDER, JAMES, WORDEN & ASSOCIATES, P.A.
  
 
 Orlando,
        Florida
 April
        14,
        2008
§ 706.206 Support of Council programs. ( a ) When a Council program is based on law or Executive order, every employee has a positive obligation to make it function as efficiently and economically as possible and to support it as long as it is a part of recognized public policy. An employee may, therefore, properly make an address explaining and interpreting such a program, citing its achievements, defending it against uninformed or unjust criticism, pointing out the need for possible improvements, or soliciting views for improving it.
( b ) An employee shall not, either directly or indirectly, use appropriated funds to influence a Member of Congress to favor or oppose legislation in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1913. However, an employee is not prohibited from: ( 1 ) Testifying as a representative of the Council on pending legislation proposals before congressional committees on request; provided, that the relevant provisions of the current OMB Circular A-14 (“Legislation Coordination and Clearance”) are complied with; or
( 2 ) Assisting congressional committees in drafting bills or reports on request, when it is clear that the employee is serving solely as a technical expert under the direction of committee leadership.
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-14-00013-CR

____________________

IN RE JOHN D. FAILS JR.

_______________________________________________________ ______________

Original Proceeding 

________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

In this mandamus proceeding, John D. Fails Jr. claims that he was arrested 

on November 14, 2012, for offenses alleged in cause number 2012-0490 and cause

or warrant number 12092601, and that since that date, he has been held by the 

Texas Department of Criminal Justice on a detainer out of Polk County. Relator

claims that he filed a request for appointment of counsel on or about December 11, 

2012, but that his request has been ignored. Relator claims that he filed other 

motions more recently, but he failed to produce any supporting documentation 

relating to those motions. 
2

To obtain mandamus relief for the trial court’s refusal to rule on a motion, a 

relator must establish: “(1) the motion was properly filed and has been pending for 

a reasonable time; (2) the relator requested a ruling on the motion; and (3) the trial 

court refused to rule.” In re Sarkissian, 243 S.W.3d 860, 861 (Tex. App.—Waco 

2008, orig. proceeding). In response to the Court’s request that he identify the 

respondent and describe the method used to inform the trial court that the 

documents were filed and required action, Relator supplemented his petition with a 

copy of a motion that is directed to “The Judicial District Court of Polk County, 

Texas[.]” The cases he identified, however, are filed in the County Court at Law of 

Polk County, Texas. We conclude that Relator has not shown the trial court failed 

to act on a properly filed motion.1 See id. We deny mandamus relief.

PETITION DENIED.

 

 PER CURIAM

Submitted on February 10, 2014

Opinion Delivered March 5, 2014

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.

 1

Relator’s petition and record fail to provide information from which we can 

determine the status of his cases. If there are matters in connection with the case 

that Fails brings to the trial court’s attention, we are confident that the trial court 

will promptly act in a manner consistent with the Code of Criminal Procedure and 

the Polk County Court Indigent Defense Plan.
### §2651. Public protection

#### (a) Public protection

No State or local educational agency may discriminate against a person in any way, including firing a person who is an employee, because the person provided information relating to a potential violation of this subchapter to any other person, including a State or the Federal Government.

#### (b) Labor Department review

Any public or private employee or representative of employees who believes he or she has been fired or otherwise discriminated against in violation of subsection (a) may within 90 days after the alleged violation occurs apply to the Secretary of Labor for a review of the firing or alleged discrimination. The review shall be conducted in accordance with section 660(c) of title 29.

(Pub. L. 94–469, title II, §211, as added Pub. L. 99–519, §2, Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2987.)
§ 701.56 Observers. ( a ) Chairmen and Vice-Chairmen of River Basin Commissions established under Title II of the Act shall be Observers.
( b ) The Chairman, with the concurrence of the Council, may invite the heads of offices or other officials of the Executive Office of the President or other Federal agencies to become Observers.
( c ) Observers may designate persons to attend Council meetings of Members. Observers will be furnished agenda and other materials on the same basis as Associate Members.
Exhibit








NPC International, Inc.
7300 West 129 Street 
Overland Park, Kansas 66213


February 17, 2016




John Hedrick


Re:    2016 Bonus Eligibility


Dear John:


Reference is made to that certain Employment Agreement (as amended, the "Employment Agreement"), dated as of June 16, 2014, by and among NPC International, Inc., NPC International Holdings, Inc. and you ("Employee").  All capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Employment Agreement.


Employee hereby acknowledges and agrees that, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Employment Agreement, solely in respect of the Company's fiscal year ending December 29, 2016 ("FY2016"), the Bonus Compensation scheme set forth in Section 4.2 of the Employment Agreement shall be disregarded and, in lieu thereof, Employee shall be eligible for a FY2016 bonus based on the methodology set forth on Exhibit A attached hereto.


Except as expressly modified above, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect (including in respect of any Bonus Compensation after FY2016).


* * * * * * *
Please acknowledge your agreement with the terms of this letter agreement by counter-signing and returning this letter agreement to the Company.


Very truly yours,


NPC INTERNATIONAL, INC.




By:  /s/ James K. Schwartz_______
Name:     James K. Schwartz
Title:    Chairman, President and CEO






ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND AGREEMENT


Effective as of the date of this letter agreement, Employee hereby agrees to be bound by its terms.




s/ John Hedrick                    
John Hedrick




Exhibit A


Bonus Methodology


 
EXHIBIT A




J. Hedrick
Chief Operating Officer












	
							
	Criteria
	Weight
	Threshold Results (50%)
	Qualifying Result (75%)
	Target Result (100%)
	Step Change (150%)
	Maximum (175%)

	EBITDA
	100%
	93.5% - 94.9% of plan
	95.0% - 99.9% of plan
	100.0% - 104.9% of plan
	105.0% - 109.9% of plan
	110.0%+ of plan






All bonus payments are interpolated per employment contract.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 970 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for the participation 

of physical therapists in the National Health Service Corps Loan Repayment Program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 1, 2019 

Mr. TESTER (for himself, Mr. WICKER, and Mr. KING) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for 

the participation of physical therapists in the National 

Health Service Corps Loan Repayment Program, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Physical Therapist 

5 Workforce and Patient Access Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 970 IS

1 SEC. 2. NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE CORPS; PARTICIPA2 TION OF PHYSICAL THERAPISTS IN LOAN RE3 PAYMENT PROGRAM. 

4 (a) MISSION OF CORPS; DEFINITION OF PRIMARY

5 HEALTH SERVICES.—Section 331(a)(3)(D) of the Public 

6 Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 254d(a)(3)(D)) is amended 

7 by striking ‘‘or mental health,’’ and inserting ‘‘mental 

8 health, or physical therapy,’’. 

9 (b) LOAN REPAYMENT PROGRAM.—Section 338B of 

10 the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 254l–1) is 

11 amended— 

12 (1) in subsection (a)— 

13 (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘; and’’ 

14 and inserting a semicolon; 

15 (B) by redesignating paragraph (2) as 

16 paragraph (3); and 

17 (C) by inserting after paragraph (1) the 

18 following: 

19 ‘‘(2) an adequate supply of physical therapists, 

20 including physical therapists for the prevention, 

21 treatment, or management of pain for individuals 

22 with substance use disorders, or at risk of developing 

23 a substance use disorder; and’’; 

24 (2) in subsection (b)(1)— 

25 (A) in subparagraph (A)— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•S 970 IS

1 (i) by striking ‘‘, or be certified’’ and 

2 inserting ‘‘; be certified’’; and 

3 (ii) by inserting before the semicolon 

4 the following: ‘‘; or have a doctoral or mas5 ter’s degree in physical therapy’’; 

6 (B) in subparagraph (B), by inserting 

7 ‘‘physical therapy,’’ after ‘‘mental health,’’; and 

8 (C) in subparagraph (C)(ii), by inserting 

9 ‘‘physical therapy,’’ after ‘‘dentistry,’’; and 

10 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

11 ‘‘(i) ELIGIBILITY TO PARTICIPATE IN OTHER PRO12 GRAMS.—Nothing in this section shall be construed to pro13 hibit any health care professional who is eligible to partici14 pate in the program under this section from participating 

15 in any other loan repayment program established by the 

16 Secretary for which such professional is eligible.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
§ 2.107 Interstate Compact. ( a ) Pursuant to D.C. Code 24-133(b)(2)(G), the Director of the Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency (CSOSA), or his designee, shall be the Compact Administrator with regard to the following individuals on parole supervision pursuant to the Interstate Parole and Probation Compact authorized by D.C. Code 24-451: ( 1 ) All D.C. Code parolees who are under the supervision of agencies in jurisdictions outside the District of Columbia; and
( 2 ) All parolees from other jurisdictions who are under the supervision of CSOSA within the District of Columbia.
( b ) Transfers of supervision pursuant to the Interstate Compact, where appropriate, may be arranged by the Compact Administrator, or his designee, and carried out with the approval of the Parole Commission. A D.C. Code parolee who is under the Parole Commission's jurisdiction will ordinarily be released or transferred to the supervision of a U.S. Probation Office outside the District of Columbia.
( c ) Upon receipt of a report that a D.C. Code parolee, who is under supervision pursuant to the Interstate Compact in a jurisdiction outside the District of Columbia, has violated his or her parole, the Commission may issue a warrant pursuant to the procedures of § 2.98. The warrant may be executed as provided as in § 2.99. A parolee who is arrested on such a warrant shall be considered to be a prisoner in federal custody, and may be returned to the District of Columbia or designated to a facility of the Bureau of Prisons at the request of the Commission.
( d ) If a parolee from another jurisdiction, who is under the supervision of CSOSA pursuant to the Interstate Compact, is alleged to have violated his or her parole, the Compact Administrator or his designee may issue a temporary warrant to secure the arrest of the parolee pending issuance of a warrant by the original paroling agency. If so requested, the Commission will conduct a courtesy revocation hearing on behalf of the original paroling agency whenever a revocation hearing within the District of Columbia is required.
( e ) The term “D.C. Code parolee” shall include any felony offender who is serving a period of parole or mandatory release supervision pursuant to a sentence of imprisonment imposed under the District of Columbia Code.
[65 FR 45888, July 26, 2000, as amended at 68 FR 41531, July 14, 2003]