alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 54 (Monday, March 21, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15306-15307]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6486]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER11-3051-000]


Macho Springs Power I, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial 
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Macho Springs Power I, LLC's application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is April 4, 2011.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC

[[Page 15307]]

Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#387e7d6a7b77565451565d6b4d4848574a4c785e5d4a5b165f574e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="80c6c5d2c3cfeeece9eee5d3f5f0f0eff2f4c0e6e5f2e3aee7eff6">[email protected]</span></a> or call (866) 
208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: March 14, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-6486 Filed 3-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

November 16, 2020. 

Resolved, That the bill from the Senate (S. 900) entitled 

‘‘An Act to designate the community-based outpatient clinic 

of the Department of Veterans Affairs in Bozeman, Montana, 

as the ‘Travis W. Atkins Department of Veterans Affairs 

Clinic’.’’, do pass with the following 

AMENDMENT: 

Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert: 

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF TRAVIS W. ATKINS DEPART2 MENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS CLINIC IN 

3 BOZEMAN, MONTANA. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The community-based outpatient 

5 clinic of the Department of Veterans Affairs located in Boze6 man, Montana, shall after the date of the enactment of this 

7 Act be known and designated as the ‘‘Travis W. Atkins De8 partment of Veterans Affairs Clinic’’ or the ‘‘Travis W. At9 kins VA Clinic’’. 

10 (b) REFERENCE.—Any reference in any law, regula11 tion, map, document, paper, or other record of the United 

12 States to the community-based outpatient clinic referred to 

13 in subsection (a) shall be considered to be a reference to 
2 

•S 900 EAH 

1 the Travis W. Atkins Department of Veterans Affairs Clin2 ic. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 900 

AMENDMENT
p.1 

OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

103) ll-K-(B)-92 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/200811:12:51 AM Sheet 103 of 325 
P.2 

/A\ P 

II-K-(B)-92 

N0X COST ALGORITHM DEVELOPMENT FOR IFCAM 

Letter from M. Jennings, Radian to T. Hogan, EEA 

October 19, 1982 

THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN DOCKET A-79-02, ITEM 

II-K-(B)-92
### §1544. Annual cost analysis by Fish and Wildlife Service

Notwithstanding section 3003 of Public Law 104–66 (31 U.S.C. 1113 note; 109 Stat. 734), on or before January 15, 1990, and each January 15 thereafter, the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Fish and Wildlife Service, shall submit to the Congress an annual report covering the preceding fiscal year which shall contain—

(1) an accounting on a species by species basis of all reasonably identifiable Federal expenditures made primarily for the conservation of endangered or threatened species pursuant to this chapter; and

(2) an accounting on a species by species basis of all reasonably identifiable expenditures made primarily for the conservation of endangered or threatened species pursuant to this chapter by States receiving grants under section 1535 of this title.

(Pub. L. 93–205, §18, as added Pub. L. 100–478, title I, §1012, Oct. 7, 1988, 102 Stat. 2314; amended Pub. L. 106–201, §1(a), May 18, 2000, 114 Stat. 307.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 93–205, Dec. 28, 1973, 81 Stat. 884, known as the Endangered Species Act of 1973, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1531 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

2000—Pub. L. 106–201, in introductory provisions, substituted "Notwithstanding section 3003 of Public Law 104–66 (31 U.S.C. 1113 note; 109 Stat. 734), on" for "On".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2000 Amendment

Pub. L. 106–201, §1(b), May 18, 2000, 114 Stat. 307, provided that: "The amendment made by this section [amending this section] takes effect on the earlier of—

"(1) the date of enactment of this Act [May 18, 2000]; or

"(2) December 19, 1999."
#### § 401.106 Records Access Officer.

The Executive Director shall designate a Commission employee as the Records Access Officer. The Records Access Officer shall be responsible for Commission compliance with the provisions of this part. All requests for agency records shall be sent to the Records Access Officer in a manner consistent with § 401.108(a).

[89 FR 51827, June 20, 2024]
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:The attached files are the following docket-related documents:
?  U.S. DOT/FAA - Final rule
?  U.S. DOT/FAA - Final rule grid
Martin . Michae l (OST ) Subject : FW : Silve rAirway s

--"^'^^'• ^ From : Charle s E . Pillar , Jr . rmailto:cpillar(aembarqmail.com 1 Sent : Thursday , Apri l 12, 201 2 3:5 1 Pl ^ To : Devany , Denni s (OST) ; ranellfenchak(g)flyiohnstownairport.com ; l^artin , l^ichae l (OST) 0 Cc : weavasel@)atlanticbb.net : wcpolacek@1wfi.com : lfross(ia)qactc.com : martym(g)abcdcorp.or q Subject : RE : Silve rAirway s C O -"SP; ^

3 n - ?=;o O Mr . DeVany , Th e Blai rCount yAirport Authorit ysupport s th e proposa l submitte d b ySilve rAirway s t o provid e commercia l ai r servic e throug h th e EA S progra m fo rth e Altoona-Blai rCount yAirportan d Johnstow n Cambri a Count yAirports . W e loo k fonward t o a mutua l partnershi p betwee n th e airport s an d airlin e alike . Pleas e contac t m e shoul d yo u requir e an yadditiona l information . Sincerely , Chuc k Pilla r Airport Manage r Connecte d b yDROI D o n Verizo n Wireles s
#### Fincher *v.*Stanley Electric Manufacturing Company.

April 21, 1910.

Attachment. Before Judge Beagan. Butts superior court.

February 19, 1909.

*Frank Z. Curry*and *O. M.*Duke, for plaintiff.

*Y. A.*Wright, for defendant.

Holden, J.

An attachment was issued for $1,110, on January 31, 1905, upon affidavit made that day stating such amount to be due by the defendant to the plaintiff. A declaration was subsequently filed, alleging that the defendant owed the plaintiff ex contractu $1,100, and that the same became due January 31, 1905. The record discloses no plea of defense filed by defendant. Upon the trial of the case a verdict was rendered as follows: “We, the jury, find for the plaintiff the sum of $300, with interest at 7 *Held,*that the pi-oper construction of the verdict is that the interest was to be computed on the principal sum of $300 from January 31, 1905, and that the plaintiff was entitled to judgment accordingly. 22 Enc. Pl. & Pr. 921; *Gray*v. *Conyers,*70 *Ga.*349, 355; *Beckwith*v. *Carleton,*14 *Ga.*691; *Van Winkle*v. *Wilkins,*91 *Ga.*93 (10), 106 (7 S. E. 644, 12 Am. St. R. 299); *Phillips*v. *Behn,*19 *Ga.*298; *Jackson*v. *Jackson,*47 *Ga.*99; *Mitchell*v. *Addison,*20 *Ga.*50.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Beck, J., disqualified.*
No. 20,073.

#### Kathryn L. Maher *v.*Francis J. Knauss, Administrator, etc.

(370 P. [2d] 1017)

Decided April 30, 1962.

Rehearing denied May 14, 1962.

Mr. Elias J. Crandell, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Wilbur M. Alter, for defendant in error.

*In Department.*

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Day.

By this writ of error it is sought to reverse a judgment of the county court denying plaintiff in error a “widow’s allowance.”

The court denied the application for the widow’s allowance and refused to enter it as a claim of the fourth class against the estate by reason of an antenuptial agreement between plaintiff in error and the decedent wherein, among other things, it provided:

*109“That first party [Kathryn L. Hott (Maher)] does waive any right to widow’s allowance, except that if she is made a beneficiary under a later will executed by said second party [Theodore F. Maher]

This language appears clear enough. It is not ambiguous and admits of no construction other than to apply the words used. Nevertheless plaintiff in error, by quoting from a number of cases dealing with the statute in question, argues that for a widow to waive her allowance, which it is admitted she can do, such waiver “must be in terms that do not admit of a doubt and clearly and definitely indicate a purpose to waive this specific *statutory right.” In Re Williams Estate,*101 Colo. 262, 72 P. (2d) 476. Armed with the above quotation from Williams, she asserts that in the agreement the word “statutory” should precede the words “widow’s allowance” and that because of its absence the widow’s allowance as provided for in ’53 C.R.S. 152-12-16 is not waived.

We do not find in the Williams case — or in any other of a long line of decisions — a requirement that reference to a “widow’s allowance” must be modified by the word “statutory” if intended to apply to the allowance provided by the statute referred to.

In *Vincent v. Martin,*91 Colo. 106, 11 P. (2d) 1089, it was said that the term “statutory allowances” includes “widow’s allowance” because “There is no statutory allowance to a widow other than a widow’s allowance.”

“ * * * If the words ‘statutory allowances’ were not intended to and do not actually include a widow’s allowance they are meaningless because there is no statutory allowance to a widow except a widow’s allowance.”

The converse of this statement is equally true. The term “widow’s allowance” can only mean the statutory widow’s allowance, there being no other such allowance provided by law. Plaintiff in error argues that the term “widow’s allowance” as used in the antenuptial agreement might refer as well to a waiver of the right of a widow to take one-half of the estate. We do not agree *110with this contention, but in the instant case it is evident that the parties had already taken care of any such interpretation by a separate paragraph, No. 3, which provides:

“That each party agrees [to] and does hereby waive and release any right to assert the option of election to take one-half of the other’s property in the event of death.”

The judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Moore and Mr. Justice Hall concur.
#### § 115.135 [Reserved]
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Motorvehicle use map. Kemmerer, Big Piney, and Greys River Ranger Districts,Bridger-Teton National Forest, Wyoming**
 
2015: FrontBack | 2016 | 2018: FrontBack
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.28:B 76/17/
Item Number:0080-G (online)
CGP systemNumber:000950697
 
June 28, 2018
### §224. Entries under land laws; toll road

Nothing herein contained shall affect any valid claim, location, or entry existing under the land laws of the United States, prior to February 26, 1919, whether for homestead, mineral, right-of-way, or any other purpose whatsoever, or shall affect the rights of any such claimant, locator, or entryman to the full use and enjoyment of his land and nothing herein contained shall affect, diminish, or impair the right and authority of the county of Coconino, in the State of Arizona, to levy and collect tolls for the passage of livestock over and upon the Bright Angel Toll Road and Trail, and the Secretary of the Interior is authorized to negotiate with the said county of Coconino for the purchase of said Bright Angel Toll Road and Trail and all rights therein.

(Feb. 26, 1919, ch. 44, §4, 40 Stat. 1177.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Herein, referred to in text, means act Feb. 26, 1919, which is classified to sections 221, 222 to 228, and 687 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

The words "prior to February 26, 1919," were in the original "existing", and refer to the date of enactment of act Feb. 26, 1919.

A provision of the original text requiring a report to Congress as to terms upon which the toll road and trail mentioned herein might be purchased was omitted as historically obsolete.
PROMISSORY NOTE

$110,000.00                                                  Scottsdale, Arizona
                                                               December 31, 1998

     For valuable  consideration,  the receipt of which is hereby  acknowledged,
and to resolve  an  existing  dispute  as more  fully set forth in that  certain
Agreement  dated February 5th 1999,  National  Scientific  Corporation,  a Texas
corporation,  and  Eden  Systems  Inc.,  an  Arizona  corporation  (collectively
"Make?'),  hereby  promises to pay to Shirley  Bonifasi the principal sum of One
Hundred Ten Thousand  Dollars  ($110,000.00),  together with interest thereon at
10% per annum  from the date of this Note  until  paid.  Principal  and  accrued
interest shall be paid in lawful money of the United States of America

     The principal sum of $110,000.00 and the accrued  interest shall be paid in
its entirety in a lump sum payment due on December 31, 2000.

     Maker  shall have the right to prepay the  principal  balance;  and accrued
interest to date of payment, in one lump sum at any time without penalty.

     Maker promises to pay, in addition to the amount found due  hereunder,  all
collection costs incurred by the holder,  including reasonable  attorney's fees,
should the holder seek to enforce its rights under this Note,  including but not
limited to bringing a legal action therefore.  Any legal action shall be brought
in the  Superior  Court for the County of  Maricopa,  State of  Arizona,  and be
subject to the laws of the State of Arizona.

     Maker and any endorsers  hereof waive  diligence,  demand,  presentment for
payment and  protest,  and consent to the  extension  of time of payment of this
Note  without  notice.  Holder has a right to assign  this Note or any  interest
therein,  together with the  collateral  being  provided as security  therefore,
without notice to Maker.

     This Note is secured by 500,000 shares of National  Scientific  Corporation
common stock.

     DATED on the date set forth above.

                                        National Scientific Corporation,
                                        a Texas corporation

                                        By /s/ L. L. Ross
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           L.L. Ross, President
                                           Eden Systems, Inc.
                                           an Arizona corporation,

                                        By /s/ L. L. Ross
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           L.L. Ross, President
### §1644. Forestry and rangeland competitive research grants

#### (a) Competitive grant authority

In addition to any grants made under other laws, the Secretary is authorized to make competitive grants that will further research activities authorized by this subchapter to Federal, State, and other governmental agencies, public or private agencies, institutions, universities, and organizations, and businesses and individuals in the United States. In making these grants, the Secretary shall emphasize basic and applied research activities that are important to achieving the purposes of this subchapter, and shall obtain, through review by qualified scientists and other methods, participation in research activities by scientists throughout the United States who have expertise in matters related to forest and rangeland renewable resources. Grants under this section shall be made at the discretion of the Secretary under whatever conditions the Secretary may prescribe, after publicly soliciting research proposals, allowing sufficient time for submission of the proposals, and considering qualitative, quantitative, financial, administrative, and other factors that the Secretary deems important in judging, comparing, and accepting the proposals. The Secretary may reject any or all proposals received under this section if the Secretary determines that it is in the public interest to do so.

#### (b) Emphasis on certain high priority forestry research

The Secretary may use up to 5 percent of the amounts made available for research under section 1642 of this title to make competitive grants regarding forestry research in the high priority research areas identified under section 1642(d) of this title.

#### (c) Emphasis on certain high priority rangeland research

The Secretary may use up to 5 percent of the amounts made available for research under section 1642 of this title to make competitive grants regarding rangeland research in the high priority research areas identified under section 1642(d) of this title.

#### (d) Priorities

In making grants under subsections (b) and (c), the Secretary shall give priority to research proposals under which—

(1) the proposed research will be collaborative research organized through a center of scientific excellence;

(2) the applicant agrees to provide matching funds (in the form of direct funding or in-kind support) in an amount equal to not less than 50 percent of the grant amount; and

(3) the proposed research will be conducted as part of an existing private and public partnership or cooperative research effort and involves several interested research partners.

(Pub. L. 95–307, §5, June 30, 1978, 92 Stat. 355; Pub. L. 105–185, title II, §253(d), June 23, 1998, 112 Stat. 561.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1998—Pub. L. 105–185 substituted section catchline for former section catchline, designated existing provisions as subsec. (a) and inserted heading, and added subsecs. (b) to (d).
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

In re: BITFENIX CO. LTD.,

Petitioner

______________________

2022-138

______________________

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United 

States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in 

No. 2:21-cv-00159-JRG-RSP, Magistrate Judge Roy S. 

Payne.

______________________

ON PETITION

______________________

O R D E R

BitFenix Co. Ltd. submits notice that it believes its 

petition for a writ of mandamus is now moot, which the 

court construes as a request to withdraw its petition.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

Case: 22-138 Document: 13 Page: 1 Filed: 05/12/2022
2 IN RE: BITFENIX CO. LTD.

BitFenix’s petition is withdrawn. 

 May 12, 2022 

 Date

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 22-138 Document: 13 Page: 2 Filed: 05/12/2022
Order entered October 7, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00633-CV

WASH TECHNOLOGIES OF AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL., Appellants

V.

JOHN T. PAPPAS, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-11-16090

ORDER

We GRANT the district clerk’s October 6, 2016 motion for an extension of time to file 

the clerk’s record. The clerk’s record shall be filed WITHIN THIRTY DAYS of the date of 

this order.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 51 (Wednesday, March 16, 2011)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 14269]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6257]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 76 , No. 51 / Wednesday, March 16, 2011 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 14269]]

                Presidential Determination No. 2011-7 of March 7, 2011

                
Unexpected Urgent Refugee and Migration Needs 
                Related to C[ocirc]te d'Ivoire

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States, 
                including section 2(c)(1) of the Migration and Refugee 
                Assistance Act of 1962 (the ``Act''), as amended, (22 
                U.S.C. 2601), I hereby determine, pursuant to section 
                2(c)(1) of the Act, that it is important to the 
                national interest to furnish assistance under the Act, 
                in an amount not to exceed $12.6 million from the 
                United States Emergency Refugee and Migration 
                Assistance Fund, for the purpose of meeting unexpected 
                and urgent refugee and migration needs, including by 
                contributions to international, governmental, and 
                nongovernmental organizations and payment of 
                administrative expenses of the Bureau of Population, 
                Refugees, and Migration of the Department of State, 
                related to humanitarian needs resulting from the recent 
                unrest in C[ocirc]te d'Ivoire.

                You are authorized and directed to publish this 
                memorandum in the Federal Register. 
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, March 7, 2011

[FR Doc. 2011-6257
Filed 3-15-11; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P