alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
31.2





CERTIFICATION





I,
Alfonso de Borbon, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Teleconnect Inc. for the three
month period ended June 30, 2009;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;





4. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:





a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepare





b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and





c)
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;





5. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):





a) all
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls; and





b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and





6. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly
report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.





October
13, 2009





By:
                /s/Alfonso
      de BorbonAlfonso
      de BorbonDirector,
      Chief Accounting and FinancialOfficer,
      Executive Vice President and ChiefOperating
      Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH 

NO. 02-17-00326-CV 

Andrea D. Smith 

v. 

Pallida, L.L.C., Successor in Interest 

of Dodeka, L.L.C. and Frost Bank

§ 

§ 

§ 

§

From the 43rd District Court 

of Parker County (CV17-0117) 

February 15, 2018 

Opinion by Chief Justice Sudderth

JUDGMENT 

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for 

want of jurisdiction. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Bonnie Sudderth 

 Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth
_

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

B.D. and J.D.,

Petitioners,

v.

OP 21-0335

THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT,

YELLOWSTONE COUNTY,

HONORABLE ROD SOUZA, Presiding,

Respondent.

JUL 2 0 2021

Bovven Greenwood

Clerk of Suprerne Court

State of Montana

ORDER

Petitioners B.D. and J.D., via counsel, seek a writ of supervisory control to reverse

an order of the Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Yellowstone County, in Cause

Nos. DN-18-411 and DN-19-194, that denied their motions to intervene.

The cases underlying this proceeding are two dependent neglect cases in which the

children have been placed in foster care and adjudicated Youths in Need of Care pursuant

to § 41-3-437, MCA. Petitioners maintain the District Court erred in concluding that

Petitioners, the foster parents of the youths who are the subject of those proceedings, are

not entitled to intervene in those matters under § 41-3-422(9)(b), MCA. Thus, they ask

this Court to take supervisory control over the District Court in these cases.

Pursuant to Article VII, Section 2(2), of the Montana Constitution, this Court may

exercise supervisory control over other courts. The procedure for a petition for such writ

is found within M. R. App. P. 14. Pertinent to our disposition of the present petition,

M. R. App. P. 14(6) provides in part, "If a petition for an extraordinary writ or for a writ

of supervisory control is filed with respect to any proceeding pending in the district court,

the petition and any exhibits relating to a ruling of the district court must be served upon

the district judge against whose ruling it is directed and upon all parties."

07/20/2021

Case Number: OP 21-0335
In this instance, Petitioners served their Petition upon the District Court, the

presiding Judge, and their own co-counsel. They failed to serve any of the parties to the

underlying case.

Petitioners' failure to comply with the mandatory provisions of Rule 14(6) leaves

this Court without jurisdiction to entertain the matter. Mont. Power Co. v. Mont. Dep't of

Pub. Serv. Regulation, 218 Mont. 471, 479, 709 P.2d 995, 999 (1985) (holding that this

Court acquires no jurisdiction to entertain and determine an appeal if the mandatory

statutory provisions are not complied with) (citing In re Malick's Estate, 124 Mont. 585,

228 P.2d 963 (dismissing an appeal where the appellant failed to serve notice of appeal as

required by statute)).

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the petition for writ of supervisory control is DENIED and

DISMISSED.

The Clerk is directed to provide immediate notice of this Order to counsel for

Petitioner, all counsel of record in the Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Yellowstone

County, Cause Nos. DN-18-411 and DN-19-194, and the Honorable Rod Souza, presiding.

DATED this ZJD day ofJuly, 2021.

Justices

2
### §217a. Change in name of Abraham Lincoln National Historical Park

The Abraham Lincoln National Historical Park at Hodgenville, Kentucky, shall on and after September 8, 1959, be known as Abraham Lincoln Birthplace National Historic Site, and any law, regulation, document, or record of the United States in which such historical park is designated or referred to under the name of Abraham Lincoln National Historic Park shall be held to refer to such historical park under and by the name of Abraham Lincoln Birthplace National Historic Site.

(Pub. L. 86–231, Sept. 8, 1959, 73 Stat. 466.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Abraham Lincoln Birthplace National Historic Site was renamed Abraham Lincoln Birthplace National Historical Park by Pub. L. 111–11, title VII, §7114(a), Mar. 30, 2009, 123 Stat. 1202.
### §8232. Severability

If any section or subsection of this chapter, or any application of such provision to any person or circumstance, is held to be unconstitutional, the remainder of this chapter, and the application of the provision to any other person or circumstance, shall not be affected.

(Pub. L. 111–203, title V, §542, July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 1596.)
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MAYRA LORENA ALVARADOCASTILLO,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 11-73017

Agency No. A094-917-054

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 13, 2012 ** 

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Mayra Lorena Alvarado-Castillo, a native and citizen of El Salvador,

petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order

denying her motion to reconsider the underlying denial of her applications for

FILED

NOV 16 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-73017

asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. 

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition for review.

Alvarado-Castillo contends that the BIA did not properly consider the

persecution she suffered in the past, and fears in the future, in El Salvador. The

BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Alvarado-Castillo’s motion to

reconsider because the motion failed to identify any error of fact or law in the

BIA’s prior decision upholding the denial of petitioner’s applications for relief. 

See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
### §246. Repealed. June 10, 1948, ch. 437, §1, 62 Stat. 352

Section, act Apr. 25, 1947, ch. 41, §6, 61 Stat. 54, related to construction of a monument to Theodore Roosevelt.
CS 315822-L 04/30/2020

cdc.gov/coronavirus

ዝተረጋገጸ COVID-19 እንተሃሊኩም ወይ እንተጠርጢርኩም፡

6. ኣብ ክትስዕልሉ

ወይድማሕንጥሸው

እትብልሉ ግዜ

ተሸፈኑ።

2. ምልክታትኩም

ብጥንቃቐ

ተኸታተሉ። ምልክታትኩም

እንተገዲዶም፣ ናብ ናይ ጥዕና

ክንክን ኣቕራቢኹም ደውሉ።

4. ናይ ሕክምና ቆጸራ እንተደኣ

ኣለኩም ኮይኑ፡ ናብቲ

ኣገልግሎትጥዕና

ብምድዋል COVID-19 

ከምዘለኩም ወይድማ

ክህልወኩም ከምዝኽእል

ሓብርዎም።

7. ኣእዳውኩምብተደጋጋሚ

ብሳሙናን ማይን እንተንኢሱ

ን20 ሰኮንድታት ተሓጸቡ፣

ወይ ኣልኮል መሰረት ዝገበረ

እንተንኢሱ 60% ኣልኮል ዘለዎ ናይ

ኢድ ሳኒታይዘር ተጠቐሙ።

8. ብዝተኻእለ መጠን፣ ኣብሓንቲ

ክፍሊጥራይ ብምኳን

ኣብ ውሽጢ ገዛኹም ካብ

ዝርከቡ ካልኦት ሰባት ርሓቑ።

እንተተኻኢሉ ድማ፣ ናትኩም ፍሉይ

ዝኾነ ሽንት ቤት ወይ ክፍሊ መሕጸቢ

ሰብነት ክትጥቀሙ ይግባእ። ኣብ

ገዛ ወይ ኣብ ደገ ኣብ ጥቓ ካልኦት

ሰባት ክትኮኑ እንተሃሊኩም ናይ ገጽ

ማስክ ተጠቐሙ።

1. ካብ ስራሕን ቤት ትምህርቲን

ኣብ ገዛኹም ጽንሑ። ካብ

ህዝባዊ ቦታታት ረሓቑ። ግድን

ክትወጹ እንተደሊኹም፣ ህዝባዊ

መጎዓዓዝያታት ራይድ ወይ ታክሲ

ብሓባር ምጥቃም ኣወግዱ።

9. ውልቃዊ ናውቲታት ምስ

ካልኦት ናይ ቤተሰብኩም

ኣባላት ብሓባር ኣይትጠቐሙ፣

ከም ሸሓነ፣ ሽጎማኖን ዓራትን።

3. እረፍቲ ርኸቡ ፈሳሲ

ድማስተዩ።

10. ኩሎምብተደጋጋሚ

ዝንክኡ ቦታታት ከም

ኣርማድዮታት፣ ጠረቤዛን

መኽፈቲ በሪን ኣጽሪዩ። ከምቲ

ኣብ ኣጠቓቕምኡ ተገሊጹ

ዝርከብ፣ መንጸጊ ወይድማ

መወልወሊ ዘለዎ ናይ ገዛ

መጽረዪ ተጠቀሙ። 

5. ህጹጽ ናይ ጥዕና ኩነታት

እንተደኣ ዘድልየኩም ኮይኑ፣

ናብ 911 ብምድዋል ነቲ

ናይዲስፓች ሰራሕተኛ

COVID-19 ከምዘለኩም

ወይ ክህልወኩም

ከምዚኽእል ሓብርዎ።

ኣብገዛኹምኮይንኩምናይ COVID-19 ምልክታትኩም

ንምቁጽጻርክትገብርዎምትኽአሉነገራት
#### William Y. Daniels *v.*Charles R. Osborn *et al.*

*Action—when premature.*Where goods are sold on a definite credit, and suit is brought for the price before the credit expires, it will be premature, and no recovery can be had.

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. William A. Porter, Judge, presiding.

This was an action of assumpsit, by the appellees against the appellant, for the price of goods sold and delivered. A trial was had, in which the plaintiffs recovered.

*170Messrs. Stores & Jamieson, for the appellant.

Per Curiam:

This was assumpsit, for goods sold and delivered. The general issue was pleaded. It appears, by the showing of the plaintiffs below, that the goods sold and in question were not to be paid for until the 9th day of October, 1872, yet this suit was commenced on the 11th day of July, 1872, before the credit expired. It was prematurely brought, and the judgment must be reversed and cause remanded.

*Judgment reversed.*
### §9096. Limitation on certain employee compensation

#### (a) In general

The Secretary may only provide financial assistance under this part to a passenger air carrier or contractor after such carrier or contractor enters into an agreement with the Secretary that provides that, during the 2-year period beginning October 1, 2020, and ending October 1, 2022—

(1) no officer or employee of the passenger air carrier or contractor whose total compensation exceeded $425,000 in calendar year 2019 (other than an employee whose compensation is determined through an existing collective bargaining agreement entered into prior to December 27, 2020) will receive from the passenger air carrier or contractor—

(A) total compensation that exceeds, during any 12 consecutive months of such 2-year period, the total compensation received by the officer or employee from the passenger air carrier or contractor in calendar year 2019; or

(B) severance pay or other benefits upon termination of employment with the passenger air carrier or contractor which exceeds twice the maximum total compensation received by the officer or employee from the passenger air carrier or contractor in calendar year 2019; and

(2) no officer or employee of the passenger air carrier or contractor whose total compensation exceeded $3,000,000 in calendar year 2019 may receive during any 12 consecutive months of such period total compensation in excess of the sum of—

(A) $3,000,000; and

(B) 50 percent of the excess over $3,000,000 of the total compensation received by the officer or employee from the passenger air carrier or contractor in calendar year 2019.

#### (b) Total compensation defined

In this section, the term "total compensation" includes salary, bonuses, awards of stock, and other financial benefits provided by a passenger air carrier or contractor to an officer or employee of the passenger air carrier or contractor.

(Pub. L. 116–260, div. N, title IV, §406, Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2057.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This part, referred to in subsec. (a), was in the original "this subtitle", meaning subtitle A (§§401–412) of title IV of div. N of Pub. L. 116–260, Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2052, which enacted this part and amended sections 9041, 9071, and 9074 of this title. For complete classification of subtitle A to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Economic Aid to Hard-Hit Small Businesses, Nonprofits, and Venues Act, and also as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, and not as part of the CARES Act which in part comprises this chapter.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          16,991
<SECURITIES>                                    25,650
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                44,971
<PP&E>                                           5,068
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,801
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  51,681
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,846
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            69
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,076
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    51,681
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,096
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,491
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 149
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (22,618)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (286)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (22,332)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (22,332)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (4.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Symptoms of Coronavirus (COVID-19)

CS 316475-A April 13, 2020 6:49 PM

If you have COVID-19, 

you may have mild (or no 

symptoms) to severe illness. 

This list is not all inclusive. Please consult your 

medical provider for any other symptoms that 

are severe or concerning.

cdc.gov/coronavirus

Seek medical attention 

immediately if you or someone 

you love has emergency 

warning signs, including:

• Trouble breathing

• Persistent pain or pressure 

in the chest

• New confusion or not able to 

be woken

• Bluish lips or face

*Symptoms may 

appear 2-14 days 

after exposure.

Fever

Cough

Shortness 

of breath

Symptoms can appear 

2-14 days after you are 

exposed to the virus that 

causes COVID-19.

Your symptoms can include the following:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David C. Farley, Appellant.

[824 NYS2d 517]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Livingston County (Joseph D. Valentino, J.), rendered December 3, 2004. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree, criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree (two counts), criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree (two counts), criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (three counts) and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (five counts).

It is hereby ordered that said appeal from the judgment insofar as it imposed sentence be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed *(see People v Haywood,*203 AD2d 966 [1994], *lv denied*83 NY2d 967 [1994]) and the judgment is affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a plea of guilty of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree (Penal Law § 220.43 [1]) and related offenses. We reject the contention of defendant that Supreme Court abused its discretion in denying his motion to withdraw the plea without first conducting a hearing. “Only in the rare instance will a defendant be entitled to an evidentiary hearing [on a motion to withdraw his plea of guilty]; often a *1230limited interrogation by the court will suffice” *(People v Tinsley,*35 NY2d 926, 927 [1974]). Contrary to the further contention of defendant, the court did not abuse its discretion in denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. The assertions of defendant, that he was denied effective assistance of counsel and that the plea was coerced, are belied by his statements during the plea colloquy *(see People v Forshey,*294 AD2d 868 [2002], *lv denied*98 NY2d 675 [2002]; *People v Rickard,*262 AD2d 1073 [1999], *lv denied*94 NY2d 828 [1999]; *People v Witcher,*222 AD2d 1016 [1995], *lv denied*87 NY2d 1027 [1996]). Present—Gorski, J.P., Smith, Centra and Green, JJ.
§ 32.0 Scope of part. This part implements the Act, which, as a general matter, authorizes the payment of three different legal gratuities: ( a ) Death benefits;
( b ) Disability benefits; and
( c ) Educational assistance benefits.
[73 FR 76528, Dec. 17, 2008]
### §6305. Registration

#### (a) Requirements

Each boxer shall register with—

(1) the boxing commission of the State in which such boxer resides; or

(2) in the case of a boxer who is a resident of a foreign country, or a State in which there is no boxing commission, the boxing commission of any State that has such a commission.

#### (b) Identification card

#### (1) Issuance

A boxing commission shall issue to each professional boxer who registers in accordance with subsection (a), an identification card that contains each of the following:

(A) A recent photograph of the boxer.

(B) The social security number of the boxer (or, in the case of a foreign boxer, any similar citizen identification number or professional boxer number from the country of residence of the boxer).

(C) A personal identification number assigned to the boxer by a boxing registry.

#### (2) Renewal

Each professional boxer shall renew his or her identification card at least once every 4 years.

#### (3) Presentation

Each professional boxer shall present his or her identification card to the appropriate boxing commission not later than the time of the weigh-in for a professional boxing match.

#### (c) Health and safety disclosures

It is the sense of the Congress that a boxing commission should, upon issuing an identification card to a boxer under subsection (b)(1), make a health and safety disclosure to that boxer as that commission considers appropriate. The health and safety disclosure should include the health and safety risks associated with boxing, and, in particular, the risk and frequency of brain injury and the advisability that a boxer periodically undergo medical procedures designed to detect brain injury.

(Pub. L. 104–272, §6, Oct. 9, 1996, 110 Stat. 3310; Pub. L. 106–210, §7(c), (f), May 26, 2000, 114 Stat. 328.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2000—Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 106–210, §7(c), substituted "4 years" for "2 years".

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 106–210, §7(f), added subsec. (c).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective July 1, 1997, see section 23(2) of Pub. L. 104–272, set out as a note under section 6301 of this title.
#### § 345.72 Cash bonus or cash award.

An inmate worker may receive a cash bonus or cash award for any suggestion or invention which is adopted by FPI and produces a net savings to FPI of at least $250.00. Cash awards shall be one percent of the net estimated savings during the first year, with the minimum award being $25.00, and the maximum award being $1,000.00.
# C_2012243EN.01001801.xml

| 11.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 243/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 243/18

---

Judgment of the General Court of 3 July 2012 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case T-594/10 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Social security - Reimbursement of medical expenses - Acts adversely affecting the applicant - Implied refusal)

2012/C 243/34

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and C. Berardis-Kayser, Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (First Chamber) of 6 October 2010 in Case F-2/10 Marcuccio v Commission, not published in the ECR, seeking the setting aside of that order.

Marcuccio

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (First Chamber) of 6 October 2010 in Case F-2/10 Marcuccio v Commission, not published in the ECR. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (First Chamber) of 6 October 2010 in Case F-2/10 Marcuccio v Commission, not published in the ECR.

| 2. | Refers the case back to the Civil Service Tribunal. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Refers the case back to the Civil Service Tribunal.

| 3. | Reserves the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Reserves the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 55, 19.2.2011.

1

---