alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with the Annual  Report of Golden  Enterprises,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form  10-K/A for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Patty Townsend, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss.906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated:  August 20, 2004


/S/PATTY TOWNSEND
-----------------
Patty Townsend
Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Golden Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by Golden Enterprises,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

                                       51
#### Rhodes *v.*Rogers.

June 14, 1910.

Equitable petition. Before Judge Hammond. Burke superior court.

July 30, 1909.

*Lamar & Callaway,*for plaintiff in error.

*E. L. Brinson,*contra.

Lumpkin, J.

1. While the evidence was conflicting, it was sufficient to support the verdict; and the presiding judge having approved it by overruling a motion for a new trial, this court will not reverse his judgment in so doing.

2. Where counsel for one side, in the course of his argument, used certain language which was calculated to excite prejudice against the adverse party, but it does not appear that the attention of the court wag called thereto or any ruling was invoked on the subject, either by way of reprimanding counsel, or of instructing the jury, or of declaring a mistrial, such impropriety in argument will not furnish ground for a reversal by this court. *Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
EXHIBIT 31.2
 SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302(a) CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 30,
2009, of AmREIT; and2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report.3.
    
    [INTENTIONALLY OMITTED]4.
    
    [INTENTIONALLY OMITTED]5.
    
    [INTENTIONALLY OMITTED]
 Date: April 3, 2009
    /s/ Chad C. BraunChad C. BraunChief Financial Officer
Exhibit
32




Certification
of Principal Executive Officers


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





The
undersigned in their capacities as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of MFRI, Inc. (the “Registrant’), certify that, to the best of their
knowledge, based upon a review of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period
ended January 31, 2010 of the Registrant, (the “Report”):





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.











/s/
      David Unger


David
Unger


Director
and Chairman of the Board of Directors


and Chief
Executive Officer


(Principal
Executive Officer)


April 16,
2010








/s/
      Michael D. Bennett


Michael
D. Bennett


Vice
President, Secretary and Treasurer


(Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)


April 16,
2010





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided by
MFRI, Inc. and will be retained by MFRI, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 53 (Friday, March 18, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14898-14899]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6368]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Daniel Boone National Forest Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Daniel Boone National Forest Resource Advisory Committee 
will meet in London, Kentucky. The committee is authorized under the 
Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act (Pub. L. 110-
343) and in compliance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act. The 
primary objective of the meeting is to review proposed project 
applications.

DATES: Monday, April 11, 2011 at 6 p.m. EST.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Cumberland Valley Area 
Development District, 342 Old Whitley Road, London, KY 40744 in a 
meeting room on the basement floor. Written comments should be sent to 
Kimberly Morgan, Daniel Boone National Forest, 1700 Bypass Road, 
Winchester, KY 40391. Comments may also be sent via e-mail to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bed5d3d1ccd9dfd0fed8cd90d8dbda90cbcd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9af1f7f5e8fdfbf4dafce9b4fcfffeb4efe9">[email protected]</span></a> or via facsimile to 859-744-1568. All comments, 
including names and addresses when provided, are placed in the record 
and are available for public inspection and copying. The public may 
inspect received comments at Daniel Boone National Forest, 1700 Bypass 
Road, Winchester, KY 40391. Visitors are encouraged to call ahead at 
859-745-3100 to arrange an appointment.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kimberly Morgan, RAC Coordinator, 
USDA, Daniel Boone National Forest, 1700 Bypass Road, Winchester, KY 
40391; (859) 745-3100; E-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#63080e0c1104020d2305104d0506074d1610"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="02696f6d7065636c4264712c6467662c7771">[email protected]</span></a>. Individuals who use 
telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal 
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 between 8 a.m. and 8 
p.m., Eastern Standard Time, Monday through Friday.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. The 
following business will be conducted: (1) Review committee operating 
guide; (2) Discuss mileage reimbursement for committee members; (3) 
Review and discuss submitted project applications; (4) Vote to approve 
project proposals; and (5) Public Comments. Persons who wish to bring 
related matters to the attention of the Resource Advisory Committee may 
file written statements with the committee staff before or after the 
meeting.


[[Page 14899]]


    Dated: March 14, 2011.
Frank R. Beum,
Forest Supervisor, Daniel Boone National Forest.
[FR Doc. 2011-6368 Filed 3-17-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Fox, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 695]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated October 25, 2004 *(People v Fox,*11 AD3d 709 [2004]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered March 27, 2003.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Adams, J.P., Santucci, Mastro and Spolzino, JJ., concur.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

December 20, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134154 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

LAUREL WOODS APARTMENTS,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 134154 

 COA: 269506 

Oakland CC: 05-069007-CZ 

NAJAH ROUMAYAH, 

 Defendant-Appellee, 

and 

REBECCA ROUMAYAH,

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 8, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal. 

s1213 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 20, 2007 

 Clerk
## In the Court of Appeals Second App ellate District of Te xas

at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 23

- 00162

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 360th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 360

- 734025

- 23

Before Womack, Wallach, and Walker, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Womack 

### I N THE 

### I NTEREST OF 

### I .I., A 

### C HILD2 MEM ORANDUM OPINION Appellant C.I. attemp ts to a ppeal from the trial cou rt ’ s “ Temporary Restra ining Order with Extraordinary Relief and Order Setting Hearing for Temporary Orders ” (the Order). On May 1 7 , 202 3 , we notified Appellant of our concern that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the Order d oes n ot appear to be a final judgment or appeal able inte rlocutory order. See Lehmann v. Har

- Con Corp. , 39 S.W.3d 191, 195,
200 (Tex. 2001) (holding that, generally, appeals may be taken only from final jud gments or inte rlocutory orders authoriz ed by stat ute) ; see also Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 105.001 (e) (providing that temporary orders in suits affecting the parent

– child relationship are not subject to an interloc utory appeal); In re Abbott , 601 S.W.3d 802,
81 3 (Tex. 20 20 ) (noting that t emporary re str a ining orders are not appealable)

. We
informed her tha t unless she or any party des iring to contin ue the appeal filed a response by May 29, 2023 , showing grounds for continuing the appeal , we could
dismis s the app eal for want o f jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a) , 44.3. Appellant has not filed a response

. Accordingly, we dismiss thi s appeal for want of juri s diction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a) , 43.2( f). /s/ Dana Womack
Dana Womack Justice
Delivere d: J u ne 22, 2023
### SUBCHAPTER LIX–PP—FIRST STATE NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK
### §160e. Payment of value differential by Secretary to owner of commercial timberlands exchanging lands for State lands outside of park; determination of value; prerequisites

The Secretary is authorized to pay a differential in value, as hereinafter set forth, to any owner of commercial timberlands within the park with whom the State of Minnesota has negotiated, for the purpose of conveyance to the United States, an exchange of lands for State lands outside the park. Payment hereunder may be made when an exchange is based upon valuations for timber purposes only, and shall be the difference between the value of such lands for timber purposes, as agreeable to the State, the Secretary, and any owner, and the higher value, if any, of such lands for recreational purposes not attributable to establishment or authorization of the park: Provided, That any payment shall be made only at such time as fee title of lands so acquired within the boundaries is conveyed to the United States.

(Pub. L. 91–661, §204, Jan. 8, 1971, 84 Stat. 1972.)
§ 115.34 Specialized training: Investigations. ( a ) In addition to the general training provided to all employees pursuant to § 115.31, the agency shall ensure that, to the extent the agency itself conducts sexual abuse investigations, its investigators have received training in conducting such investigations in confinement settings.
( b ) Specialized training shall include techniques for interviewing sexual abuse victims, proper use of *Miranda* and *Garrity* warnings, sexual abuse evidence collection in confinement settings, and the criteria and evidence required to substantiate a case for administrative action or prosecution referral.
( c ) The agency shall maintain documentation that agency investigators have completed the required specialized training in conducting sexual abuse investigations.
( d ) Any State entity or Department of Justice component that investigates sexual abuse in confinement settings shall provide such training to its agents and investigators who conduct such investigations.
§ 17.25 Identification and markings. ( a ) Classified information must be marked pursuant to the standards set forth in section 1.7 of Executive Order 12958; ISOO implementing directives in 32 CFR 2001, subpart B; and internal Department of Justice direction provided by the Department Security Officer.
( b ) Foreign government information shall be marked or classified at a level equivalent to that level of classification assigned by the originating foreign government.
( c ) Information assigned a level of classification under predecessor Executive Orders shall be considered as classified at that level of classification.
### §1304. Annual payment; adjustment

In return for the agreement of the owner or operator, the Secretary shall (1) make an annual payment to the owner or operator for the period of the agreement at such rate or rates as the Secretary determines to be fair and reasonable in consideration of the obligations undertaken by the owner or operator; and (2) bear such part of the average cost of establishing and maintaining conservation and development practices on the wetlands and adjacent areas for the purposes of this chapter as the Secretary determines to be appropriate. In making his determination, the Secretary shall consider, among other things, the rate of compensation necessary to encourage owners or operators of wetlands to participate in the water bank program. The rate or rates of annual payments as determined hereunder shall be increased, by an amount determined by the Secretary to be appropriate, in relation to the benefit to the general public of the use of the wetland areas, together with designated adjacent areas, if the owner or operator agrees to permit, without other compensation, access to such acreage by the general public, during the agreement period, for hunting, trapping, fishing, and hiking, subject to applicable State and Federal regulations. The rates of annual payment shall be adjusted, to the extent provided for in advance by appropriation Acts, in accordance with section 1302 of this title.

(Pub. L. 91–559, §5, Dec. 19, 1970, 84 Stat. 1470; Pub. L. 96–182, §3, Jan. 2, 1980, 93 Stat. 1317.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1980—Pub. L. 96–182 inserted provisions that the rates of annual payment shall be adjusted, to the extent provided for in advance by appropriation acts, in accordance with section 1302 of this title.
§ 18.10 Rehearing. ( a ) Any appellant dissatisfied with a final agency decision under § 18.9 may, within 30 days after the notice of the final agency decision is sent, request the responsible agency official to re-review the record, and present additional evidence which is appropriate and pertinent to support a different decision.
( b ) If the responsible agency official finds that the appellant has: ( 1 ) Presented evidence or argument which is sufficiently significant to require the conduct of further proceedings; or
( 2 ) Shown some defect in the conduct of the initial hearing sufficient to cause substantial unfairness or an erroneous finding in that hearing, the responsible agency official may require that another oral hearing be held on one or more of the issues in controversy, or permit the dissatisfied party to present further evidence or argument in writing.
( c ) Any rehearing ordered by the responsible agency official shall be conducted pursuant to §§ 18.5-18.8.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

February 24, 2006

Before

Hon. RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge

Hon. DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge

Hon. ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge

SELEMAWIT F. GIDAY, ] Petition for Review of

 Petitioner, ] an Order of the Board of

 ] Immigration Appeals

No. 04-1962 v. ] 

 ] No. A95-395-594

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, ] 

 Respondent. ] 

 ] 

IT IS ORDERED that respondent's motion for clarification is GRANTED. 

The clerk shall amend page nine of the slip opinion by replacing the words

"Department of Homeland Security" with the words "Department of Justice".
# WASHOE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DIVISION April 26 , 2013 Dr. Co ll ee n C ripp s, Ph. D . Admini st rat o r Di v is i o n o f Env ir o nm e ntal Protec ti o n 90 I S. Stew art S t. , S uit e 400 I Cars on C ity N Y 89 7 01- 52 49 Dear Dr. Cripps : 

### Public Health Prevent. Promote. Protect.

Enclosed is a re vision to the Washoe County portion of Nevada ' s O zone Infrastructure State Implementation Plan (I - SIP). " The Washoe County Portion of the Nevada State Implementation Plan for the 2008 Ozone NAAQS: Demonstration of Adequac y" wa s adopted at a public hearing ofthe Washoe County District Board of Health on February 28 , 2013. The submittal includes: • Approved minutes from the February 2 8 , 2 013 public hearing ; and • Certificate of Adoption. These two e leme nts complete the partial submittal to the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection on April 4 , 2013 . Two paper and two electronic copies of the submittal are enclo s ed. The electronic copies are exact duplicates of the paper cop y submittal in s earchable pdfformat. Pleas e re vie w thes e documents and determine if this initial submittal is complete. If so , then please forward one paper and one ele ctronic copy to the U . S . EPA Region IX office . If you have an y que stion s or comments regardin g this submittal , feel fre e to contact Mr. Daniel Inou ye or me at ( 775 ) 7 84- 7200. Sincerely ,

# ?fJr~~4!2/ Kevin Dick Director Enclosures cc: Daniel Inouye , Washoe County Health District - AQMD (w /

o enclo sure s ) P.O . BOX 11130 Reno, NV 89520-0027· (7 7 5) 7 84-7200· FAX (775) 784-7225 www.washoecounty.us/health Pr int ed on Recycl ed Pa per
### §179. Donations of buildings and other property

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized, in his discretion, to accept buildings, moneys, or other property which may be useful in the betterment of the administration and affairs of the Glacier National Park under his supervision, and which may be donated for park purposes. He may accept patented lands or rights-of-way over patented lands in the Glacier National Park that may be donated for park purposes.

(July 1, 1916, ch. 209, §1, 39 Stat. 308; June 12, 1917, ch. 27, §1, 40 Stat. 151.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

The first sentence of this section is from section 1 of act June 12, 1917, and the last sentence from section 1 of act July 1, 1916.
#### Jacob G. Miller, Respondent, v. Charles Jacob and C. Albert Jacob, Appellants.

Motion for rearguznezit denied, with ten dollars costs. Present —Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ.
### §1406. Administration

The Commission, in carrying out its responsibilities under this subchapter, may—

(1) employ and fix the compensation of such personnel;

(2) acquire, furnish, and equip such office space;

(3) enter into such contracts or agreements with, or provide such grants to, other organizations, both public and private;

(4) procure the services of such experts or consultants or an organization thereof as is authorized under section 3109 of title 5 (but at rates for individuals not to exceed $100 per diem); and

(5) incur such necessary expenses and exercise such other powers, as are consistent with and reasonably required to perform its functions under this subchapter; except that no fewer than 11 employees must be employed under paragraph (1) at any time. Financial and administrative services (including those related to budgeting, accounting, financial reporting, personnel, and procurement) shall be provided the Commission by the General Services Administration, for which payment shall be made in advance, or by reimbursement from funds of the Commission in such amounts as may be agreed upon by the Chairman and the Administrator of General Services.

(Pub. L. 92–522, title II, §206, Oct. 21, 1972, 86 Stat. 1045; Pub. L. 97–58, §6(2), Oct. 9, 1981, 95 Stat. 987; Pub. L. 98–364, title I, §103(b), July 17, 1984, 98 Stat. 442.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1984—Par. (5). Pub. L. 98–364 inserted "; except that no fewer than 11 employees must be employed under paragraph (1) at any time" at end.

1981—Par. (3). Pub. L. 97–58 substituted "contracts or agreements with, or provide such grants to, other organizations" for "contracts or agreements with other organizations".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective upon the expiration of the sixty-day period following Oct. 21, 1972, see section 4 of Pub. L. 92–522, set out as a note under section 1361 of this title.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007 of Financial Security Assurance
Holdings Ltd. (the "Company"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert P. Cochran, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  | By: | /s/ROBERT P. COCHRANChief Executive Officer
March 19, 2008
| |  | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
Order entered October 2 1 , 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 21
- 00689
- CV ANGELOS KOLOBOTOS AND KOLOBOTOS PROPERTIES, LLC , Appellant s V. JTREO, INC. AND DAVID BU TTROSS A/K/A/ DAVID A. BUTTROSS, II , Appellee s On Appeal from the 95th District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 20
- 07775

O RDER By notice filed October 19, 2021, appellants inform the Court that appellant
A ngelos Kolobotos has filed f or bankru ptcy

. Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 8.2, further action in this cause is automatically suspended. See T EX
. R.
A PP
. P. 8.2. Accordingly, for administrative purposes, this cause is ABATED and treated as a closed case. It may be r einstated on motion by any party showing, inaccordance with rule of appellate procedure 8.3, that the appeal is permitted by

federal law or the bankruptcy court. See id. 8.3.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
#### § 16.49 Fees.

Components shall charge fees for duplication of records under the Privacy Act in the same way in which they charge duplication fees for responding to FOIA requests under § 16.10. No search or review fee may be charged for any record unless the record has been exempted from access pursuant to exemptions enumerated in the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2) or (k)(2).
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Michael T. Obermoeller, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 71-14;

Second District

November 2, 1971.

E. Roger Horsky and Ralph Ruebner, of Defender Project, of Elgin, for appellant.

Jack Hoogasian, State’s Attorney, of Waukegan, for the People.

Opinion *by*

Mr. JUSTICE SEIDENFELD.