alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012217EN.01000402.xml

| 21.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 June 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — M.J. Bakker v Minister van Financiën

(Case C-106/11) (1)

1

(Social security for migrant workers - Legislation applicable - Worker holding Netherlands nationality working, for an employer established in the Netherlands, on board dredgers flying the Netherlands flag which operate outside the territory of the European Union - Residence in the territory of another Member State - Affiliation to the Netherlands social security system)

2012/C 217/07

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: M.J. Bakker

Applicant:

Defendant: Minister van Financiën

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Interpretation of Articles 1(a), 2 and 13(2)(c) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community (OJ, English special edition, 1971(II), p. 416) — Worker with Netherlands nationality working on dredgers sailing outside the territory of the European Union under the Netherlands flag for an employer established in the Netherlands — Worker residing on the territory of another Member State — No affiliation to the Netherlands social security scheme

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 13(2)(c) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community, as amended and updated by Council Regulation (EC) No 118/97 of 2 December 1996, as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 307/1999 of 8 February 1999, must be interpreted as precluding a legislative measure of a Member State from excluding, from affiliation to the social security scheme of that Member State, a person in the position of the applicant in the main proceedings, who holds that Member State’s nationality but does not reside in it and is employed on board a dredger flying the flag of that Member State and operating outside the territory of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ C 160, 28.5.2011.

1

---
# C_2012217EN.01000302.xml

| 21.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 7 June 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad — Bulgaria) — Anton Vinkov v Nachalnik Administrativno-nakazatelna deynost

(Case C-27/11) (1)

1

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Non-recognition in national law of the right to a judicial remedy in respect of decisions imposing a financial penalty and the deduction of points for certain breaches of road traffic regulations - Purely internal situation - Inadmissibility of the reference)

2012/C 217/05

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Referring court

Administrativen sad Sofia-grad

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Anton Vinkov

Applicant:

Defendant: Nachalnik Administrativno-nakazatelna deynost

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Administrativen sad Sofia-grad — Interpretation of Article 82(1)(a) TFEU and Article 91(1)(c) TFEU and Council Framework Decision 2005/214/JHA of 24 February 2005 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to financial penalties (OJ 2005 L 76, p. 16) — Interpretation of Articles 47, 48 and 52 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Compatibility with EU law of national rules excluding the right to bring an action before a court challenging decisions relating to financial penalties following administrative offences in road traffic cases amounting to BGN 50

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The reference for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad (Bulgaria), made by decision of 27 December 2010 (Case C-27/11), is inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 145, 14.5.2011.

1

---
Sanitized Copy

Sanitized Copy

Attachment 7

Page 4A section e(1) precursor substance information.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21
- 6720

ZANNIE JAY LOTHARP , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro

. Loretta C. Biggs , District Judge. ( 1:20

- cv - 01062

- LCB

- LPA )

Submitted : January 20, 2022 Decided: January 24, 2022

Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded by un published per curiam opinion

. Zannie Jay Lotharp , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Zannie Jay Lotharp appeals the district court’s ord er adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing Lotharp’s civil action. In its order, the court stated that Lotharp had filed no objections to the recommendation within the time period prescribed by 28 U.S.C. § 636. On appeal, Lotharp cl aims that he did not receive the recommendation, making it impossible to object. He notes that the recommendation was returned to the clerk as undeliverable and that, pursuant to M.D.N.C. R. 11.1(b), he had 63 days to notify the court of his change in add ress. A party who fails to object in writing to a magistrate judge’s proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law is not entitled to de novo review of the magistrate judge’s determinations by the district court and is barred from contesting those det erminations on appeal. Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845

- 46 (4th Cir. 1985); see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). However, the waiver of appellate rights for failing to object is a prudential rule, not a jurisdictional requirement. Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140, 154 (1985). When a litigant is proceeding pro se, he must be given fair notice of the consequences of failing to object before a procedural default will apply. Wright , 766 F.2d at 846

- 47. The record shows that Lotharp never received a copy of the reco mmendation before the district court dismissed his case

. Accordingly, we vacate the decision of the district court and remand with directions to provide Lotharp with a copy of the recommendation and notice of the consequences of failing to object . We den y as moot Lotharp’s motion to stay and remand.3 We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
VACATED AND REMANDED
§ 430.9 Comprehensive plan policies. The water resources within the Southeastern Pennsylvania Ground Water Protected Area shall be managed consistent with the Comprehensive Plan policies. For purposes of this ground water protected area, section 2.20.4 of the Water Code of the Delaware River Basin shall be applied using the following definition of the term “withdrawal limits”: ( a ) *Withdrawal limits.* Except as may be otherwise determined by the Commission to be in the public interest, withdrawals from the underground waters of the basin shall be limited to the maximum draft of all withdrawals from a ground water basin, aquifer, or aquifer system that can be sustained without rendering supplies unreliable, causing long-term progressive lowering of ground water levels, water quality degradation, permanent loss of storage capacity, or substantial impact on low flows of perennial streams.
( b ) [Reserved]
### **CHAPTER 44A—ANTARCTIC MARINE LIVING RESOURCES CONVENTION**

Sec.
2431.
Findings and purpose.
2432.
Definitions.
2433.
Representatives.
2434.
Conservation measures; system of observation and inspection.
2435.
Unlawful activities.
2436.
Regulations.
2437.
Civil penalties.
2438.
Criminal offenses.
2439.
Enforcement.
2440.
Jurisdiction of courts.
2441.
Federal agency cooperation.
2442.
Relationship to existing treaties and statutes.
2443.
Authorization of appropriations.
2444.
Severability.
•.•iKi: ^SPORWIOM 

COKET dPEHMIONS 

m i •FB iS P 3-- ! 

Docket Management Facility 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket No. FAA-2012-0089 

1200 New Jersey Ave. SE 

West Building Grand Floor, Room W-120140 

Washington, DC 20590 

February 9, 2012 

To Whom It May Concern: 

I wish to express my strong support for Sun Country Airlines' slot exemption. Docket 

No. FAA-2012-0089, to maintain its current nonstop Lansing-to Washington, DC route. 

As.a resident-oLLansing, Michigan, former-state^of Michigan.employee_and.currentMichigan State University employee with frequent business in our nation's capital, direct 

nonstop flights from Lansing Capital Region International Airport to Washington, DC 

have provided an extremely valuable service. The flights also provide convenient and 

affordable transportation between mid-Michigan and Washington, DC for vacation travel. 

The only alternative is to book connecting flight from Lansing to Detroit Metro Airport, 

or drive to Detroit Metro Airport, for flights to/from Washington, DC. This usually 

requires significant extra expenses for fiiel, parking, and time commitments for driving. 

It is my understanding that demand and passenger bookings for these flights to/from 

Lansing and Washington, DC, have exceeded expectations and market projections. While 

I'm sure that the regulations, criteria and process for approving airport slots for airlines 

are complicated and based on a variety of factors, I hope that U.S. DOT and any other 

agencies within the federal bureaucracy that have jurisdiction are able to accommodate 

this need that serves so many people in the mid-Michigan area. 

Thank you for considering this letter of support for Sun Country Airlines. 

Sincerely, 

Phillip D. Schertzin 

3580 Donamere Dr. 

Lansing, MI 48906
§ 390.3 Waiver applications. ( a ) A person may satisfy the requirement of Sec. 390.1 by submitting a written statement showing good cause why the person is unable to register electronically, and including the name and address of the person serving as a contact. The statement must be mailed to the Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, or hand delivered to Room 1A at the same address.
( b ) Persons who register pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section will receive a unique numeric identifier that must appear on all paper submissions to the Commission. A submission that does not include the identifier will be rejected. Notification of such rejection will be sent to the submitter at the address indicated on the paper submission. A request for a waiver may be submitted simultaneously with a document submitted for filing. If the waiver is granted, the Secretary will add the assigned numeric identifier to the submitted document(s), but will not do so for subsequent submissions.
( c ) A waiver under paragraph (a) of this section will be valid for one year from the date of issuance by the Secretary. The Secretary will send notice of the pending expiration to the registered person's address of record approximately three months prior to the expiration of the waiver. After the waiver expires, a person wishing to engage in any of the activities listed in § 390.2 must comply with § 390.1, or must apply for another waiver under paragraph (a) of this section.
[Order 891, 67 FR 52410, Aug. 12, 2002, as amended at 70 FR 21332, Apr. 26, 2005]
LAVEZ-VOUS LES MAINS

après avoir été aux toilettes

1 000 000 000 000

de germes peuvent 

vivre dans un gramme 

d’excréments (C’est le poids d’un trombone !)
### §8961. PFAS destruction and disposal guidance

#### (a) In general

Not later than 1 year after December 20, 2019, the Administrator shall publish interim guidance on the destruction and disposal of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances and materials containing perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances, including—

(1) aqueous film-forming foam;

(2) soil and biosolids;

(3) textiles, other than consumer goods, treated with perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances;

(4) spent filters, membranes, resins, granular carbon, and other waste from water treatment;

(5) landfill leachate containing perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances; and

(6) solid, liquid, or gas waste streams containing perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances from facilities manufacturing or using perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances.

#### (b) Considerations; inclusions

The interim guidance under subsection (a) shall—

(1) take into consideration—

(A) the potential for releases of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances during destruction or disposal, including through volatilization, air dispersion, or leachate; and

(B) potentially vulnerable populations living near likely destruction or disposal sites; and

(2) provide guidance on testing and monitoring air, effluent, and soil near potential destruction or disposal sites for releases described in paragraph (1)(A).

#### (c) Revisions

The Administrator shall publish revisions to the interim guidance under subsection (a) as the Administrator determines to be appropriate, but not less frequently than once every 3 years.

(Pub. L. 116–92, div. F, title LXXIII, §7361, Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 2289.)
SÍNTOMAS DE LA ENFERMEDAD DEL 

CORONAVIRUS 2019 

*Symptoms may 

appear 2-14 days 

after exposure. 

CS315252-B 

Para obtener más información: www.cdc.gov/COVID19-es 

DIFICULTAD 

PARA RESPIRAR

TOS

Si usted ha estado en China o ha 

tenido contacto cercano con 

alguien con COVID-19 

confirmado en las últimas 2 

semanas y presenta síntomas, 

llame al médico. 

*Los síntomas pueden aparecer de 

2 a 14 días después de la exposición.

Los síntomas FIEBRE *pueden incluir

Los pacientes con COVID-19 han presentado enfermedad 

respiratoria de leve a grave.

ENFERMEDAD DEL 

CORONAVIRUS
### **CHAPTER 74—NATIONAL MARITIME HERITAGE**

Sec.
5401 to 5409. Omitted or Repealed.
vktx-ex101_6.htm



Exhibit 10.1

FIRST AMENDMENT TO 

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 

This First Amendment to Employment Agreement (this “Amendment”), effective as of March 14, 2016, is made by and between Viking Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) and Brian Lian, Ph.D. (“Executive”).

Recitals

Whereas, the Company and Executive are parties to that certain Employment Agreement, effective as of June 2, 2014, by and between the Company and Executive (the “Agreement”); and

Whereas, the Company and Executive wish to amend the Agreement as set forth herein.

Now, Therefore, in consideration of the foregoing premises and the mutual covenants and conditions set forth below, and in reliance on the recitals set forth above, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties to this Amendment hereby agree as follows:

Agreement

1.The second sentence of Section 2(b) of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows: “Executive’s target Annual Bonus, to the extent earned, will be fifty percent (50%) of Executive’s Base Salary in effect on June 30th of such calendar year.”.

2.The validity, interpretation, construction, and performance of this Amendment shall be governed by the laws of the State of California (excluding any that mandates the use of another jurisdiction’s laws). The enforcement of an arbitration award, or any other action in connection with this Amendment, only may be brought in the courts of the County of San Diego, State of California or federal courts situated within the County of San Diego, State of California.

3.The invalidity or unenforceability of any provision of this Amendment shall not affect the validity or enforceability of any other provision of this Amendment, which shall remain in full force and effect.

4.This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original but all of which together shall constitute the same instrument.

5.Except as modified by this Amendment, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.

[Remainder of This Page Intentionally Left Blank]

 

 



 

In Witness Whereof, this Amendment is effective as of the date first above written.

 


			
	
 
	
VIKING THERAPEUTICS, INC.

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
By:
	
/s/ Michael Morneau 

	
 
	
 
	
Name: Michael Morneau

	
 
	
 
	
Title: Chief Financial Officer

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
/s/ Brian Lian, Ph.D.

	
 
	
 
	
Brian Lian, Ph.D.
Exhibit 23.2



                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




We consent to the use of our report dated November 3, 2006, except as to note
22 which is dated March 23, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial
statements of METRO, Inc. as at September 30, 2006 and for the year then
ended, included in The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, Inc. ("A&P US")
Annual Report on revised Form 10-K for the year ended February 24, 2007 which
is referred in the Form 10-K/A to be filed with U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission on April 9, 2008.




                                                Ernst & Young, LLP
                                                Chartered Accountant


Montreal, Canada
April 9, 2008
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.2

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We have issued our report dated January 12, 1996, accompanying the 
consolidated financial statements incorporated by reference of Harveys Casino 
Resorts on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 1997.  We hereby consent 
to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration 
Statement of Harveys Casino Resorts on Forms S-8 (File No. 33-75932, 
effective March 2, 1994 and File No. 333-08983, effective July 26, 1996).

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP


Reno, Nevada
February 25, 1998
### **CHAPTER 87A—MODERNIZING ACCESS TO PUBLIC LAND**

Sec.
6851.
Definitions.
6852.
Interagency data standardization.
6853.
Digitization and publication of easements.
6854.
Data consolidation and publication of route and area data for public recreational use.
6855.
Cooperation and coordination.
6856.
Reports.
6857.
Authorization of appropriations.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 48 (Friday, March 11, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 13444]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5706]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: <greek-i> 7241]


Advisory Committee on Historical Diplomatic Documentation; Notice 
of Charter Renewal

    The Advisory Committee on Historical Diplomatic Documentation is 
renewing its charter for a period of two years. This Advisory Committee 
will continue to make recommendations to the Historian and the 
Department of State on all aspects of the Department's program to 
publish the Foreign Relations of the United States series as well as on 
the Department's responsibility under statute (22 U.S.C. 4351, et seq.) 
to open its 30-year-old and older records for public review at the 
National Archives and Records Administration. The Committee consists of 
nine members drawn from among historians, political scientists, 
archivists, international lawyers, and other social scientists who are 
distinguished in the field of U.S. foreign relations.
    Questions concerning the Committee and the renewal of its Charter 
should be directed to Edward Brynn, Executive Secretary, Advisory 
Committee on Historical Diplomatic Documentation, Department of State, 
Office of the Historian, Washington, DC 20520, telephone (202) 663-1123 
(e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3e56574d4a514c477e4d4a5f4a5b10595148"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="51393822253e23281122253025347f363e27">[email protected]</span></a>).

    Dated: February 9, 2011.
Edward Brynn,
Executive Secretary, Advisory Committee on Historical Diplomatic 
Documentation, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-5706 Filed 3-10-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-11-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Editorial Note on Part 284
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 284 appear at 65 FR 10222, Feb. 25, 2000.

§ 284.15 Bidding by affiliates in open seasons for pipeline capacity. ( a ) Multiple affiliates of the same entity may not participate in an open season for pipeline capacity conducted by any interstate pipeline providing service under subparts B and G of this part, in which the pipeline may allocate capacity on a *pro rata* basis, unless each affiliate has an independent business reason for submitting a bid.
( b ) For purposes of this section, an affiliate is any person that satisfies the definition of affiliate in § 358.3(a)(1) and (3) of this chapter with respect to another entity participating in an open season subject to paragraph (a) of this section.
[Order 894, 76 FR 72306, Nov. 23, 2011]
### §290c. Standards, criteria, and procedures for preparation and publication of standard reference data; publication in Federal Register

To provide for more effective integration and coordination of standard reference data activities, the Secretary, in consultation with other interested Federal agencies, shall prescribe and publish in the Federal Register such standards, criteria, and procedures for the preparation and publication of standard reference data as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 90–396, §4, July 11, 1968, 82 Stat. 340.)
### §80a–57. Changes in investment policy

No business development company shall, unless authorized by the vote of a majority of its outstanding voting securities or partnership interests, change the nature of its business so as to cease to be, or to withdraw its election as, a business development company.

(Aug. 22, 1940, ch. 686, title I, §58, as added Pub. L. 96–477, title I, §105, Oct. 21, 1980, 94 Stat. 2285.)
§ 93.102 Ports designated for the importation of birds. ( a ) *Special ports for pet birds.* The following ports are designated as ports of entry for pet birds imported under the provisions of § 93.101(c) and performing or theatrical birds imported under the provisions of § 93.101(f): Los Angeles and San Ysidro, CA; Miami, FL; New York, NY; Baudette, MN; and Hidalgo, TX.
( b ) *Designation of other ports.* The Secretary of the Treasury has approved the designation as quarantine stations of the ports specified in this section. In special cases other ports may be designated as quarantine stations under this section by the Administrator, with the concurrence of the Secretary of the Treasury.
( c ) Notwithstanding any other provisions of this section, all commercial birds, zoological birds, or research birds shall be imported only at a port of entry specified in § 93.105.
( d ) *Limited ports.* The following ports are designated as ports of entry for pet birds imported under the provisions of § 93.101(c)(1) or (2) and performing or theatrical birds imported under the provisions of § 93.101(f): Anchorage and Fairbanks, AK; San Diego, CA; Jacksonville, Port Canaveral, St. Petersburg-Clearwater, and Tampa, FL; Atlanta, GA; Honolulu, HI; Chicago, IL; New Orleans, LA; Baltimore, MD; Portland, ME; Minneapolis, MN; Great Falls, MT; Covington, KY (Greater Cincinnati International Airport); Portland, OR; San Juan, PR; Galveston and Houston, TX; and Seattle, Spokane, and Tacoma, WA.
[55 FR 31495, Aug. 2, 1990, as amended at 59 FR 36026, July 15, 1994; 60 FR 16045, Mar. 29, 1995; 60 FR 25120, May 11, 1995; 61 FR 68125, Dec. 27, 1996. Redesignated and amended at 62 FR 56012, 56014, Oct. 28, 1997; 65 FR 38178, June 20, 2000; 67 FR 6370, Feb. 12, 2002]