### 57092 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 185 / Wednesday, September 24, 2014 / Notices

trees and shrubs. There are no food/feed uses and, it is exempt from a tolerance requirement when used as a sticker agent in packaging of insect control products used on food crops. Polybutene is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as an indirect food additive and is used as an ingredient in cosmetic products that are applied directly to the skin such as sun block or moisturizer, and that may be incidentally ingested, such as lipstick. EPA conducted a qualitative assessment for both human health and ecological risks. No risks of concern were identified in the human health risk assessment. The ecological risk assessment indicated that there was no reasonable expectation for any registered use of polybutene to cause direct or indirect adverse effects to threatened and endangered species. A ‘‘no effect’’ determination was made for all federally listed species and designated critical habitat. Pursuant to FFDCA section 408(p)(4), EPA has exempted polybutene from the requirements of the EDSP in an Administrative Order (AO) entitled ‘‘Exemption of Polybutene from the Requirements of the Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program’’ which is available in the registration review docket.

Undecylenic acid (Registration Review Decision). EPA has completed a registration review decision for undecylenic acid (UDA). The registration review docket for UDA (EPA–HQ–OPP–2011–0910) opened in December 2011. EPA issued the proposed decision for UDA on June 4, 2014 and took comment for 60 days. The Agency received one comment from the Center for Biological Diversity, which supported the proposed registration review decision. UDA is registered as an insecticide and miticide in pet shampoos and spray products in combination with dioctyl sodium sulfosuccinate (DSS). As a pesticidal active ingredient, there are no food uses and, thus, no tolerances are established. UDA is approved by the FDA as an active ingredient in over the counter anti-fungal products, and it is also used as a flavoring agent. EPA has conducted a qualitative assessment for both human health and ecological risks, including listed species for UDA. The human health risk assessment did not identify any risks of concern for UDA. The ecological risk assessment made a ‘‘no effect’’ determination for federally listed species and designated critical habitat. Pursuant to FFDCA section 408(p)(4), EPA has exempted UDA from the requirements of the EDSP in an AO entitled ‘‘Exemption of Dioctyl Sodium Sulfosuccinate (DSS) and Undecylenic Acid (UDA) from the Requirements of the Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program’’ which is available in the registration review docket.

Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.57, a registration review decision is the Agency’s determination whether a pesticide meets, or does not meet, the standard for registration in FIFRA. EPA has considered Ancymidol, DEET, Denatonium Saccharide, Dioctyl Sodium Sulfosuccinate, Metofluthrin, Polybutene Resins, and Undecylenic Acid in light of the FIFRA standard for registration. The Ancymidol, DEET, Denatonium Saccharide, Dioctyl Sodium Sulfosuccinate, Metofluthrin, Polybutene Resins, and Undecylenic Acid Final or Interim Decision documents in the respective dockets describe the Agency’s rationale for issuing a registration review final or interim decision for these pesticides.

Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.58(c), the registration review case docket for Ancymidol, DEET, Denatonium Saccharide, Dioctyl Sodium Sulfosuccinate, Metofluthrin, Polybutene Resins, and Undecylenic Acid will remain open until all actions required in the final decision have been completed.

Background on the registration review program is provided at: http:// www.epa.gov/oppsrrd1/registration

_ review. Links to earlier documents related to the registration review of this pesticide are provided at: http:// www2.epa.gov/pesticide-reevaluation/individual-pesticides-registrationreview.
B. What is the Agency’s authority for taking this action?

Section 3(g) of FIFRA and 40 CFR part 155, subpart C, provide authority for this action.

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.
Dated: September 16, 2014. Richard P. Keigwin, Jr.,
Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.

[FR Doc. 2014–22740 Filed 9–23–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**[EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0565; FRL–9915–03]**

**Registration Review; Pesticide Dockets Opened for Review and**  **Comment**

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). **ACTION :**  Notice.

**SUMMARY :**  With this document, EPA is opening the public comment period for several registration reviews. Registration review is EPA’s periodic review of pesticide registrations to ensure that each pesticide continues to satisfy the statutory standard for registration, that is, the pesticide can perform its intended function without unreasonable adverse effects on human health or the environment. Registration review dockets contain information that will assist the public in understanding the types of information and issues that the Agency may consider during the course of registration reviews. Through this program, EPA is ensuring that each pesticide’s registration is based on current scientific and other knowledge, including its effects on human health and the environment. This document also announces registration review case closures for 3 H–1,2 Dithiol-3-one,4,5,- dichloro- (RHY–86) (case 5033) and tepraloxydim (case 7257). In addition, this document announces the Agency’s intent not to open registration review cases for mepanipyrim (case 7042) and vinclozolin (case 2740) because there are no longer any active registrations containing either of these chemicals. The two case closures and the Agency’s intent not to open two registration review cases being announced herein are not open for public comment.

**DATES :**  Comments must be received on or before November 24, 2014.

**ADDRESSES :**  Submit your comments identified by the docket identification (ID) number for the specific pesticide of interest provided in the table in Unit III.A., by one of the following methods:

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/ DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001.

• Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the instructions at http:// www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.

Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along with more information about dockets generally, is available at http:// www.epa.gov/dockets.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :** 

For pesticide specific information

contact: The Chemical Review Manager


### 57093 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 185 / Wednesday, September 24, 2014 / Notices

for the pesticide of interest identified in the table in Unit III.A.

For general information contact: Richard Dumas, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone number: (703) 308–8015; fax number: (703) 308–8005; email address: dumas.richard@epa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 

I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?

This action is directed to the public in general, and may be of interest to a wide range of stakeholders including environmental, human health, farmworker, and agricultural advocates; the chemical industry; pesticide users; and members of the public interested in the sale, distribution, or use of pesticides. Since others also may be interested, the Agency has not attempted to describe all the specific entities that may be affected by this
action.
B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?

1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or CD–ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD–ROM the specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket. Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.

2. Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments, remember

to:

i. Identify the document by docket ID number and other identifying information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).

ii. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.

iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and substitute language for your requested changes.

iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information and/ or data that you used.

v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be reproduced.

vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and suggest alternatives.

vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of profanity or personal threats.

viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline identified.

3. Environmental justice. EPA seeks to achieve environmental justice, the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of any group, including minority and/or low income populations, in the development, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies. To help address potential environmental justice issues, the Agency seeks information on any groups or segments of the population who, as a result of their location, cultural practices, or other factors, may have atypical or disproportionately high and adverse human health impacts or environmental effects from exposure to the pesticides discussed in this document, compared to the general population.

II. Authority

EPA is initiating its reviews of the pesticides identified in this document pursuant to section 3(g) of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and the Procedural Regulations for Registration Review at 40 CFR part 155, subpart C. Section 3(g) of FIFRA provides, among other things, that the registrations of pesticides are to be reviewed every 15 years. Under FIFRA, a pesticide product may be registered or remain registered only if it meets the statutory standard for registration given in FIFRA section 3(c)(5). When used in accordance with widespread and commonly recognized practice, the pesticide product must perform its intended function without unreasonable adverse effects on the environment; that is, without any unreasonable risk to man or the environment, or a human dietary risk from residues that result from the use of a pesticide in or on food.

III. Registration Reviews
A. What action is the Agency taking?

As directed by FIFRA section 3(g), EPA is reviewing the pesticide registrations identified in the table in this unit to assure that they continue to satisfy the FIFRA standard for registration—that is, they can still be used without unreasonable adverse effects on human health or the environment. A pesticide’s registration review begins when the Agency establishes a docket for the pesticide’s registration review case and opens the docket for public review and comment. At present, EPA is opening registration review dockets for the cases identified in the following table.



### TABLE 

### 1—R EGISTRATION 

### R EVIEW 

### DOCKETS 

### O PENING

Registration review case name and No. Docket ID No. Chemical review manager or regulatory action leader, telephone No., email Address

2-(thiocyanomethylthio)

benzothiazole (TCMTB (Case 2625). EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0405 ............................................ Sandra O’Neill, (703) 347–0141, oneill.sandra@epa.gov.

1,3-Propanediamine, N-(3-

aminopropyl)- N -dodecyl- (PAD) (Case 5109). EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0406 ............................................ Tina Pham, (703) 308–0125, pham.tina@epa.gov.

3(2H)-Isothiazolone, 4,5-

dichloro-2-octyl- (DCOIT) (Case 5023). EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0403 ............................................ SanYvette Williams, (703) 305–7702, williams.sanyvette@epa.gov.

Bacillus thuringiensis (Case

0247). EPA–HQ–OPP–2011–0705 ............................................ Jeannine Kausch, (703) 347–8920, kausch.jeannine@epa.gov. Cyhalofop-butyl (Case 7255) EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0115 ............................................ Jolene Trujillo, (703) 347–0103, trujillo.jolene@epa.gov. Diclofop-methyl (Case 2160) EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0577 ............................................ Marianne Mannix, (703) 347–0275, mannix.marianne@epa.gov.


### 57094 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 185 / Wednesday, September 24, 2014 / Notices

TABLE 

### 1—R EGISTRATION 

### R EVIEW 

### DOCKETS 

### O PENING

### —Continued

Registration review case name and No. Docket ID No. Chemical review manager or regulatory action leader, telephone No., email Address

Etoxazole (Case 7616) ........ EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0133 ............................................ Julia Stokes, (703) 347–8966, stokes.julia@epa.gov. Fenpropimorph (Case 5112) EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0404 ............................................ Donna Kamarei, (703) 347–0443, kamarei.donna@epa.gov. Fluroxypyr,1-

methylheptylester (Case 7248). EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0570 ............................................ Benjamin Askin, (703) 347–0503, askin.benjamin@epa.gov.

GABA & LGA (Case 6025) .. EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0109 ............................................ Menyon Adams, (703) 347–8496, adams.menyon@epa.gov. Imazapic (Case 7234) .......... EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0279 ............................................ Ricardo Jones, (703) 347–0493, jones.ricardo@epa.gov. Imazaquin (Case 7204) ....... EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0224 ............................................ Wilhelmena Livingston, (703) 308–8025, livingston.wilhelmena@epa.gov. Polyoxin D Zinc Salt (Case

6076). EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0108 ............................................ Manying Xue, (703) 305–6198, xue.manying@epa.gov.

Noviflumuron (Case 7434) ... EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0566 ............................................ Dana Friedman, (703) 347–8827, friedman.dana@epa.gov. Streptomyces lydicus WYEC

(Case 6088). EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0608 ............................................ Kathleen Martin, (703) 308–2857, martin.kathleen@epa.gov. Tebufenpyrad (Case 7435) .. EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0218 ............................................ Susan Bartow, (703) 603–0065, bartow.susan@epa.gov. Triallate (Case 2695) ........... EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0573 ............................................ Katherine St. Clair, (703) 347–8778, stclair.katherine@epa.gov. Zinc pyrithione (Case 2480) EPA–HQ–OPP–2004–0147 ............................................ Sandra O’Neill, (703) 347–0141, oneill.sandra@epa.gov.

This notice also announces two case closures and the Agency’s intent not to open a registration review case for two additional chemicals. The registration review case for 3 H–1,2 Dithiol-3- one,4,5-dichloro- (RYH–86) (case 5033) is being closed for non-payment of maintenance fees for the last two remaining registrations. The tepraloxydim (case 7257) registration review case is being closed because the last products were canceled in the Federal Register notice on August 6, 2014 (79 FR 45798) (FRL–9914–09). The ‘‘Notice of Registration Review Case Closure for Tepraloxydim’’ is available in the docket EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0246 at http://www.regulations.gov. The Agency intends not to open registration review cases for vinclozolin (case 2740) and mepanipyrim (case 7042) because there are no longer any products registered containing these active ingredients. The cancellation order for the last vinclozolin registrations was issued in the Federal Register notice on August 13, 2014 (79 FR 47454) (FRL– 9914–00). There are no longer any products registered containing mepanipyrim. The two cases closures and the Agency’s intent not to open two registration review cases being announced herein are not open for public comment.

B. Docket Content

1. Review dockets. The registration review dockets contain information that the Agency may consider in the course of the registration review. The Agency may include information from its files including, but not limited to, the following information:

• An overview of the registration
review case status.

• A list of current product registrations and registrants.

• Federal Register notices regarding any pending registration actions.

• Federal Register notices regarding current or pending tolerances.

• Risk assessments.

• Bibliographies concerning current registrations.

• Summaries of incident data.

• Any other pertinent data or information.

Each docket contains a document summarizing what the Agency currently knows about the pesticide case and a preliminary work plan for anticipated data and assessment needs. Additional documents provide more detailed information. During this public comment period, the Agency is asking that interested persons identify any additional information they believe the Agency should consider during the registration reviews of these pesticides. The Agency identifies in each docket the areas where public comment is specifically requested, though comment in any area is welcome.

2. Other related information. More information on these cases, including the active ingredients for each case, may be located in the registration review schedule on the Agency’s Web site at http://www.epa.gov/oppsrrd1/ registration

_review/schedule.htm. Information on the Agency’s registration review program and its implementing regulation may be seen at http:// www.epa.gov/oppsrrd1/registration

_ review.

3. Information submission requirements. Anyone may submit data or information in response to this document. To be considered during a pesticide’s registration review, the submitted data or information must meet the following requirements:

• To ensure that EPA will consider data or information submitted, interested persons must submit the data or information during the comment period. The Agency may, at its discretion, consider data or information submitted at a later date.

• The data or information submitted must be presented in a legible and useable form. For example, an English translation must accompany any material that is not in English and a written transcript must accompany any information submitted as an audiographic or videographic record. Written material may be submitted in paper or electronic form.

• Submitters must clearly identify the source of any submitted data or information.

• Submitters may request the Agency to reconsider data or information that the Agency rejected in a previous review. However, submitters must explain why they believe the Agency


### 57095 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 185 / Wednesday, September 24, 2014 / Notices

should reconsider the data or information in the pesticide’s registration review.

As provided in 40 CFR 155.58, the registration review docket for each pesticide case will remain publicly accessible through the duration of the registration review process; that is, until all actions required in the final decision on the registration review case have been completed.

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.
Dated: September 18, 2014. Richard P. Keigwin, Jr.,
Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.

[FR Doc. 2014–22747 Filed 9–23–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION** 

**Information Collections Being Reviewed by the Federal**  **Communications Commission Under Delegated Authority** 

**AGENCY :**  Federal Communications
Commission.

**ACTION :**  Notice and request for

comments.

**SUMMARY :**  As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, and as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501– 3520), the Federal Communications Commission (FCC or the Commission) invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the following information collection. Comments are requested concerning: whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the information shall have practical utility; the accuracy of the Commission’s burden estimate; ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology; and ways to further reduce the information collection burden on small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.

The FCC may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid control number. No person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information subject to the PRA that does not display a valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number.

**DATES :**  Written PRA comments should be submitted on or before November 24, 2014. If you anticipate that you will be submitting comments, but find it difficult to do so within the period of time allowed by this notice, you should advise the contact listed below as soon as possible.

**ADDRESSES :**  Direct all PRA comments to Cathy Williams, FCC, via email PRA@ fcc.gov and to Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  For additional information about the information collection, contact Cathy Williams at (202) 418–2918.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 

OMB Control Number: 3060–0208. Title: Section 73.1870, Chief Operators.

Form Number: Not applicable. Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.

Respondents: Business and other forprofit; Not-for-profit institutions.

Number of Respondents and Responses: 18,498 respondents; 36,996

responses.

Estimated Time per Response: 0.166– 26 hours.

Frequency of Response: Recordkeeping requirement; Third party disclosure requirement.

Total Annual Burden: 484,019 hours. Total Annual Costs: None. Obligation to Respond: Required to obtain or retain benefits. The statutory authority for this collection of information is contained in Sections 154(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.

Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: There is no need for confidentiality with this collection of information.

Privacy Impact Assessment(s): No impact(s).

Needs and Uses: 47 CFR Section 73.1870 requires that the licensee of an AM, FM, or TV broadcast station designate a chief operator of the station. Section 73.1870(b)(3) requires that this designation must be in writing and posted with the station license. Section 73.1870(c)(3) requires that the chief operator, or personnel delegated and supervised by the chief operator, review the station records at least once each week to determine if required entries are being made correctly, and verify that the station has been operated in accordance with FCC rules and the station authorization. Upon completion of the review, the chief operator must date and sign the log, initiate corrective action which may be necessary and advise the station licensee of any condition which is repetitive. The posting of the designation of the chief operator is used by interested parties to readily identify the chief operator. The review of the station records is used by the chief operator, and FCC staff in investigations, to ensure that the station is operating in accordance with its station authorization and the FCC rules and regulations.

OMB Control Number: 3060–0055. Title: Application for Cable Television Relay Service Station License, FCC

Form 327.

Form Number: FCC Form 327. Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.

Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities; Not-for-profit
institutions.

Number of Respondents and Responses: 400 respondents; 400

responses.

Estimated Time per Response: 3.166 hours.

Frequency of Response: On occasion reporting requirement; Every 5 years reporting requirement.

Total Annual Burden: 1,266 hours. Total Annual Costs: $98,000. Obligation To Respond: Required to obtain or retain benefits. The statutory authority for this collection of information is contained in Sections 154(i), 308 and 309 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.

Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: There is no need for confidentiality with this collection of information.

Privacy Impact Assessment(s): No impact(s).

Needs and Uses: This filing is the application for a Cable Television Relay Service (CARS) microwave radio license. Franchised cable systems and other eligible services use the 2, 7, 12 and 18 GHz CARS bands for microwave relays pursuant to part 78 of the Commission’s Rules. CARS is principally a video transmission service used for intermediate links in a distribution network. CARS stations relay signals for and supply program material to cable television systems andother eligible entities using point-topoint and point-to-multipoint transmissions. These relay stations enable cable systems and other CARS licensees to transmit television broadcast and low power television and related audio signals, AM and FM broadcast stations, and cablecasting from one point (e.g., on one side of a river or mountain) to another point (e.g., the other side of the river or mountain) or many points (‘‘multipoint’’) via microwave. The filing is done for an initial license, for modification of an