alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010148EN.01004201.xml

| 5.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/42

---

Action brought on 25 March 2010 — Hynix Semiconductor v Commission

(Case T-149/10)

2010/C 148/70

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Hynix Semiconductor, Inc. (Icheon-si, Korea) (represented by: A. Woodgate and O. Heinisch, Solicitors)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | annul the Commission Decision C(2010) 150 dated 15 January 2010; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Commission Decision C(2010) 150 dated 15 January 2010;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs;

| — | grant such other relief as the Court considers appropriate. |
| --- | --- |

—

grant such other relief as the Court considers appropriate.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In the present case, the applicant seeks the annulment of the Commission Decision C(2010) 150 rejecting, for lack of the Community interest, the applicant’s complaint regarding alleged violations by Rambus of Articles 102 TFUE in connection with claiming of potentially abusive royalties for the use of certain patents for “Dynamic Random Access Memory” (DRAM) (Case COMP/38.636 — Rambus) following the Commission decision of 9 December 2009 by which it made binding upon Rambus certain commitments in accordance with Article 9 of the Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (1) and decided that there were no longer grounds for action.

1

In support of its claims, the applicant puts forward five pleas in law.

First, it submits that the Commission violated essential procedural requirements by not granting the applicant sufficient access to relevant documents.

Second, the applicant argues that there remains strong community interest in pursuing its complaint. It submits that the Commission based its rejection decision exclusively on the fact that there is no longer community interest given that it adopted the Article 9 decision. In the applicant’s view, in this case the position and reasoning adopted by the Commission makes the question of Community interest and the validity of the rejection decision intrinsically linked to the validity of the Article 9 decision which is contested by the applicant in Case T-148/10.

Third, fourth and fifth plea raised by the applicant are identical to the first, second and third plea that it puts forward in Case T-148/10 and concern the alleged violations committed by the Commission when adopting the Article 9 decision making binding upon Rambus certain commitments.

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty, OJ 2003 L 1, p. 1

1

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  SBA Leadership 
-  Isabel Casillas Guzman 

#   Isabel Casillas Guzman

Administrator

            Download high-resolution image          

**Isabel Casillas Guzman** is the 27th Administrator of the U.S. Small Business Administration and serves in President Biden’s Cabinet as the leading advocate for America’s 33 million small businesses and innovative startups.

Guzman has made advancing entrepreneurship her life’s work. Growing up, she worked alongside her father in his chain of veterinary hospitals, an experience that shaped her understanding of entrepreneurship and its transformative effect on customers and on communities. She went on to launch her own businesses across a range of industries and advise other founders in paving their way to the American Dream of business ownership. She served as SBA’s Deputy Chief of Staff in the Obama-Biden Administration and then led the California Office of the Small Business Advocate. In early 2021, President Biden asked her to lead the SBA, and her nomination was confirmed by a bipartisan vote in the U.S. Senate.

Under Guzman's leadership, the agency manages a $500 billion portfolio and deploys $50 billion in funding annually to America’s small business owners. As administrator, she spearheaded key agency initiatives to deliver essential pandemic assistance to the most vulnerable small businesses and underserved communities. She has also implemented effective strategies that help small businesses and innovative startups gain unprecedented access to capital, contracting, professional networks, technical training, digital tools and disaster support. As a result, more than ever before, millions of America’s entrepreneurs have the resources they need to start, grow and build resilient businesses. 

@SBAIsabel on X, Instagram, and Facebook.

sba.administrator@sba.gov

## Blogs by   Isabel Casillas Guzman

                  -  Championing Equitable Access for Women Business OwnersBy Isabel Casillas Guzman on March 31, 2021
SBA Administrator Isabella Casillas Guzman reflects on achievements and challenges for the women small business community
#### § 104.44 Determination of presumed noneconomic losses for death for claims on behalf of decedents.

The presumed non-economic losses for an eligible death shall be $250,000 plus an additional $100,000 for the spouse and each dependent of the deceased victim. Such presumed losses include a noneconomic component of replacement services loss.
# C_2013225EN.01001101.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 27 June 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di pace di Mercato San Severino — Italy) — Ciro Di Donna v Società imballaggi metallici Salerno srl (SIMSA)

(Case C-492/11) (1)

1

(Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Mediation in civil and commercial matters - Directive 2008/52/EC - National legislation providing for a compulsory mediation procedure - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 225/16

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Giudice di pace di Mercato San Severino

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Ciro Di Donna

Applicant:

Defendant: Società imballaggi metallici Salerno srl (SIMSA)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Giudice di pace di Mercato San Severino — Interpretation of Articles 6(1) and 13 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and of Directive 2008/52/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on certain aspects of mediation in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2008 L 136, p. 3) — National legislation imposing a compulsory attempt at conciliation before judicial proceedings can be brought, such as can affect the initiation, duration and the outcome of proceedings

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

There is no need to answer the question referred by the Giudice di pace di Mercato San Severino (Italy) by decision of 21 September 2011 for a preliminary ruling in Case C-492/11.

---

(1)  OJ C 347, 26.11.2011.

1

---
## ~ 

# - 

# ~·



# 6t

**"** , 

# ,

, '·\ '



### , , 

# . **~** 

### 'l

' ,J , **~** ._ 

# __ **~** 

# - " ' I 

## .. '



### . **~**



### • • 

# ' "' --
·.



# , ,

**\** 

# ' . ,,. 4

I . •• **~ ~\**  **,** 

# us .. **~** • 

### • •



# --- ' 

# - 

# ... • r ·

,
#### § 415.2 Definitions.

For the purposes of this part, except as otherwise required by the context:

*Project* means the same word as defined by section 1.2(g) of the Delaware River Basin Compact.

*Floodway* means the channel of the watercourse and those portions of the adjoining flood plains which are reasonably required to carry and discharge the regulatory flood. For this purpose the limit of the floodway shall be established by allowing not more than a one-foot rise of the water surface elevation of the regulatory flood as a result of encroachment. Wherever practical, equal conveyance reduction from each side of the flood plain shall be used. (See Figure 1.)

[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/EC05OC91.022/EC05OC91.022_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/EC05OC91.022/EC05OC91.022_original_size.png)

*Flood fringe* means that portion of the flood hazard area outside the floodway.

*Flood hazard area* means the area inundated by the regulatory flood.

*Flood plain* means the area adjoining the channel of a stream which has been or hereafter may be covered by flood water.

*Floodproofing* means any combination of structural and nonstructural additions, changes, or adjustments to properties and structures which reduce or eliminate flood damage to lands, water and sanitary facilities, structures, and contents of buildings.

*Flood protection elevation* means one foot above the elevation of the flood that has a one percent chance of occurring in any one year. (The 100-year flood).

*Major tributary* means the mainstem of the following streams:

# Pennsylvania

Brandywine Creek, Brodhead Creek, Big Bushkill Creek, Lackawaxen, Lehigh, Schuylkill, Neshaminy.

# Delaware

Brandywine Creek, Christina.

# New York

East Branch, Mongaup, Neversink, West Branch.

# New Jersey

Assunpink, Musconetcong, Paulins Kill, Rancocas, Pequest.

*Official flood plain map* means a map showing the flood plain area of a community prepared pursuant to the National Flood Insurance Act, or a map recognized by the Executive Director as meeting equivalent hydraulic or engineering criteria.

*Regulatory flood* means the flood which has a one percent chance of occurring in any one year. (The 100-year flood.)

*Structure* means any assembly of material above or below the surface of land or water, including but not limited to, buildings, dams, fills, levees, bulkheads, dikes, jetties, embankments, causeways, culverts, roads, railroads and bridges.
EX-10.20.B



 Exhibit 10.20b 

CONFIDENTIAL 
 First Amendment to Consulting
Agreement 
 This First Amendment, effective as of June 3, 2015 (the “Amendment”) is made to the Consulting Agreement
dated June 4, 2014, as amended (the “Agreement”) by and between Stereotaxis, Inc., a Delaware corporation (hereinafter “Stereotaxis”) with offices located at 4320 Forest Park Avenue, Suite 100, St. Louis, Missouri 63108 and Eric
N. Prystowsky, M.D. (hereinafter “Consultant”). 
 WHEREAS, Consultant and Stereotaxis wish to amend the Agreement to extend the
term of the Agreement for a period of one year; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, Stereotaxis and Consultant hereby agree as follows: 

 

	 	1.	The Term of the Agreement is hereby extended for a period of one year from the effective date of this Amendment, up to and including June 2, 2016. 


Except as specifically modified by this Amendment, all terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 

[Signature Page Follows] 

  

					
	 DW.5-4-15
	  	Page 1 of 2	  	










 CONFIDENTIAL 
  

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first written
above. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, by facsimile transmission or by e-mail delivery of a “.pdf” format data file, each of which shall constitute an original and all of which together shall constitute one instrument.

  

			
	STEREOTAXIS, INC.
		
	BY:	 	/s/ Karen W. Duros
	Name:	 	Karen W. Duros
	Title:	 	Sr. VP & General Counsel
		 	Compliance Officer
	DATE:	 	May 4, 2015

  

			
	CONSULTANT:
		
	SIGNED:	 	/s/ Eric N. Prystowsky, M.D.
	Name:	 	Eric N. Prystowsky, M.D.
	DATE:	 	May 5, 2015


  

					
	 DW.5-4-15
	  	Page 2 of 2
From: Jordan, Ronald

To: jlapcev@firstenergycorp.com

Cc: Thomas Finseth; Schroeder, Cuc; Flanders, Phillip

Subject: Available for a short call on Monday?

Date: Thursday, May 29, 2014 12:20:28 PM

Joe,

Are you available for a short call on Monday? We have just a few more questions, including these

listed below:

1. Comparing the data you provided on 5/2/2014 and 5/13/2014, we observed apparent data

entry errors. Please specify which values for mercury Chem Precip Effluent are correct.

Date 5/2/2014 dataset

(Hg, ng/L)

5/13/2014 dataset

(Hg, ng/L)

12/20/2011 122 12.2

1/3/2012 424 42.4

2/2/2012 144 14.4

2/21/2012 170 17

2. What is the cause for elevated mercury concentrations for Chem Precip Effluent on the

following dates?

a. 2/28/2012 (1520 ng/L)

b. 3/13/2012 (1160 ng/L)

c. 3/20/2012 (1710 ng/L)

d. 3/27/2012 (1320 ng/L)

e. 4/3/2012 (3400 ng/L)

f. 6/5/2012 (830 ng/L)

3. We noticed dates for Method 245.1 (mercury) data and Method 200.8 (arsenic) data

changed between your original spreadsheet provided 2/20/2014 and the updated

spreadsheets provided 5/2/2014 and 5/13/2014. Specifically, the 2/20/2014 spreadsheet

shows the 245.1 and 200.8 data on 12/18/12, 1/4/13, and 1/8/13; the 5/2/2014

spreadsheet shows these data on 11/29/12, 12/19/12, and 12/21/12. Which dates are

correct?
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Document Search 
-  Fund-of-Fund SBIC Presentation 

# Fund-of-Fund SBIC Presentation

## About this document and download

Fund and direct investors in underserved and undercapitalized markets

  Download  .pdf

**Owned by**
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  About SBA 
-  Organization 
-  Observances 
-  Women's History Month 

## Section navigation

-  SBA locations 
-  Open government 
-  SBA Newsroom 
-  Work for SBA 
-  Organization    -  SBA leadership 
  -  Contact SBA 
  -  SBA initiatives 
  -  Forms and documents 
  -  Performance 
  -  Observances      -  Celebrating 70 years of service to America's small businesses 
    -  Hispanic Heritage Month 
    -  LGBTQ+ Pride Month 
    -  AANHPI Heritage Month 
    -  National Small Business Week 
    -  Women's History Month 
    -  Black History Month 
    -  National Veterans Small Business Week 
    -  Native American Heritage Month 
    -  National Women’s Small Business Month 
  -  Federal advisory committees 
-  Oversight and advocacy 
-  Information in other languages 

# Women's History Month

----

## Content

----

Every March, SBA celebrates women entrepreneurs and highlights resources, funding and training available to women-owned small businesses.

## Women-owned businesses propel our economy forward

                  - According to the  **National Women’s Business Council 2023 Annual Report** :
                  - 14 million women-owned businesses make up 39.1% of all U.S. businesses, a 13.6% increase from 2019 to 2023.
                  - Black/African American women-owned businesses represent 14.8% of all women-owned and 52.1% of all Black-owned businesses.
                  - Hispanic/Latina women-owned businesses represent 14.3% of all women-owned and 42.3% of all Hispanic/Latino-owned businesses.
                  - Women-owned businesses add $1.8 trillion to America’s gross domestic product every year.

## Upcoming events

The SBA regularly hosts online training events on a variety of topics for the new or seasoned small business owner. 

## Resources

To provide the best possible resources to women-owned businesses, SBA collaborates with federal and non-federal partners to help small businesses grow, expand, and recover.

Here you'll find information on how to start or improve a business, how to apply for funding, and how to find government contracting opportunities. 
                  - Office of Women’s Business Ownership
                  - Funding
                  - Federal contracting
                  - Additional resources

##  Ascent Learning

          Visit Ascent website        

## Contact

If you have questions about SBA's programs and services, you can directly contact your nearest SBA District Office. SBA District Offices offer counseling, training, and business development to help you start and grow your business.
EXHIBIT NO. 99.2

WRITTEN STATEMENT

 PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

The undersigned, Marc T. Giles, the Chief Executive Officer of Gerber Scientific, Inc. (the "Company"), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, hereby certifies that:

(i)	the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2003 of the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)	the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  July 28, 2003

/s/ Marc T. Giles
No. 20,832.

#### In the Matter of the Petition of James Carlos Pigg for leave to proceed in forma pauperis for Writ of Error and application for appointment of Counsel.

(384 P. [2d] 267)

Decided June 24, 1963.

Petitioner, pro se.

*En Banc.*

Mr. Justice Pringle

delivered the opinion of the Court.

*501On May 31, 1963, James Carlos Pigg, a prisoner in the state penitentiary, filed in this Court a motion or petition seeking to prosecute, *in forma pauperis,*a writ of error to a judgment of the district court of the City and County of Denver denying a writ of habeas corpus. Included in the motion was a request that this Court assign counsel to him for the purpose of prosecuting a writ of error to such judgment.

The leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*in this Court is granted and the writ of error is ordered issued. The petitioner’s request to have *this*Court assign counsel to him for the purpose of prosecuting such writ of error is denied. The proper forum for appointment of counsel on behalf of an indigent defendant to prosecute a writ of error following conviction of a crime in the trial court, or an adverse judgment in a habeas corpus matter testing the propriety of the confinement of the applicant arising from a criminal proceeding, is the trial court. If on application to the trial court, counsel for the purpose of review is denied the applicant, the proper methods to review such action in this Court are available to the applicant.

The rule we have stated applies whether or not a writ of error has already been issued by this Court. See *In the Matter of the Petition of Alexander Griffin,*152 Colo. 347, 382 P. (2d) 202. See also *Douglas v. California,*372 U.S. 353, 9 L. Ed. (2d) 811, 83 S. Ct. 814.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Quotemedia, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, R. Keith Guelpa, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to my best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        
|------------------------
|By:  /s/ R. Keith Guelpa
|R. Keith Guelpa         
|Chief Executive Officer 
|October 29, 2010
### SUBCHAPTER CXXVII—BLACK ROCK DESERT-HIGH ROCK CANYON EMIGRANT TRAILS NATIONAL CONSERVATION AREA
### §17j–1. Repealed. Pub. L. 113–287, §7, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3272

Section, act June 18, 1940, ch. 395, §1, 54 Stat. 445, related to travel expenses for attendance of National Park Service field employees at authorized meetings.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 30, 2017

Order 

Clerk

June 30, 2017

154814(60)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 154814

v COA: 327491

Wayne CC: 14-004600-FH

DARRELL WILDER, a/k/a DARRELL JOHN

WILDER, a/k/a DARRELL J. WILDER, Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff-appellee to extend the time 

for filing its supplement brief to August 4, 2017, is GRANTED. The same extension is 

given to defendant-appellant to file his supplemental brief.
# ALJ Initial Decisions:  Administrative Law Judges

The latest ALJ Initial Decisions from the Securities and Exchange Commission

- American CryptoFed DAO LLC American CryptoFED DAO LLC
- Horter Investment Management, LLC and Drew K. Horter 
- Electropremium 
- Life Science Holdings, Inc. 
- Reynolds, Norman T., Esq. 
- Rosedale Asset Management, LLC f/k/a Princeton Advisory Wealth Management, LLC 
- Sweet, Brian, CPA 
- Mosshart, Joshua D. 
- Anton & Chia, LLP Wahl, Gregory A., CPA Deutchman, Michael, CPA Chung, Georgia, CPA Shek, Tommy, CPA 
- Crest Radius, Inc. 7 Kaapa Tsolgo, Estonia 
- Sears, William J. 
- Goulding, Randall, Esq. 
- Feathers, Mark 
- Harris, Talman 
- Bebo, Laurie Buono, John, CPA 
- Ascension Asset Management, LLC Gooder, Grenville M., JR. 
- China Biopharma, Inc. China Linen Textile Industry, Ltd. China Water Group, Inc. Scout Exploration, Inc. Teryl Resources Corp. 
- Gibson, Christopher M. 
- Starkot Corp. 
- Finn, Sean P. M. Dwyer LLC 
- Can-Cal Resources Ltd. China Fruits Corp. Skystar Bio-Pharmaceutical Co. 
- Anderson, Traci J., CPA Carnahan, Timothy W. CYIOS Corporation 
- Graham, Jonathan Edward 
- Retirement Surety LLC Crescendo Financial LLC Rose, Thomas Leeman, David Featherstone, David 
- Amundsen, Joseph S., CPA Remus, Michael T., CPA Remus Michael, CPA
§ 115.276 Disciplinary sanctions for staff. ( a ) Staff shall be subject to disciplinary sanctions up to and including termination for violating agency sexual abuse or sexual harassment policies.
( b ) Termination shall be the presumptive disciplinary sanction for staff who have engaged in sexual abuse.
( c ) Disciplinary sanctions for violations of agency policies relating to sexual abuse or sexual harassment (other than actually engaging in sexual abuse) shall be commensurate with the nature and circumstances of the acts committed, the staff member's disciplinary history, and the sanctions imposed for comparable offenses by other staff with similar histories.
( d ) All terminations for violations of agency sexual abuse or sexual harassment policies, or resignations by staff who would have been terminated if not for their resignation, shall be reported to law enforcement agencies, unless the activity was clearly not criminal, and to any relevant licensing bodies.