_____________________________________________________________________________

Annual Report on Nationally Recognized 

Statistical Rating Organizations

_____________________________________________________________________________

As Required by Section 6

of the Credit Rating Agency Reform Act of 2006

This is a report of the Staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

The Commission has expressed no view regarding the analysis, findings, or conclusions 

contained herein.

__________________________________

December 2018
 

i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................1

II. STATUS OF REGISTRANTS AND APPLICANTS......................................... 2

III. ACTIVITIES RELATING TO NRSROs........................................................... 3

A. Activities.....................................................................................................3

B. Commission Orders and Releases and Staff Publications............................... 4

IV. COMPETITION................................................................................................7

A. Select NRSRO Statistics..............................................................................7

1. NRSRO Credit Ratings Outstanding .................................................... 7

(a) Number of Outstanding Ratings in Statutory Rating Categories.... 7

(b) Industry Concentration...............................................................12

2. NRSRO Analytical Staffing Levels.................................................... 14

3. NRSRO Revenue Growth.................................................................. 15

B. Recent Developments in the State of Competition among NRSROs............. 16

1. Market Share Developments in the Asset-Backed Securities Rating 

Category ........................................................................................... 16

(a) CMBS.......................................................................................17

(b) ABS/MBS .................................................................................20

2. Other NRSRO Developments ............................................................ 22

C. Barriers to Entry........................................................................................ 25

V. TRANSPARENCY........................................................................................... 26

VI. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST.......................................................................... 29

VII. CONCLUSION................................................................................................ 30
 

ii

TABLE OF CHARTS

Chart 1: Number of Outstanding Credit Ratings as of December 31, 2017 by Rating 

Category............................................................................................................9

Chart 2: Percentage by Rating Category of Each NRSRO’s Outstanding Credit 

Ratings of the Total Outstanding Credit Ratings of all NRSROs, as of 

December 31, 2017 ............................................................................................9

Chart 3: Breakdown of Ratings Reported Outstanding on December 31, 2017.................10

Chart 4: Breakdown of Non-Government Securities Ratings Reported Outstanding 

on December 31, 2017 .....................................................................................11

Chart 5: HHI Inverses for Each Rating Category ............................................................13

Chart 6: NRSRO Credit Analysts and Credit Analyst Supervisors...................................14

Chart 7: NRSRO Revenue Information: Fiscal Year Percentage of Total Reported 

NRSRO Revenue .............................................................................................15

Chart 8: Rating Agency Market Share for Total Non-Agency U.S. CMBS Issued in 

2016, 2017, and First Half of 2018....................................................................18

Chart 9: Rating Agency Market Share for U.S. Conduit CMBS Issued in 2016, 

2017, and First Half of 2018.............................................................................18

Chart 10: Rating Agency Market Share for U.S. Single Borrower CMBS Issued in 

2016, 2017, and First Half of 2018....................................................................19

Chart 11: Rating Agency Market Share for Agency CMBS Issued in 2016, 2017, 

and First Half of 2018 ......................................................................................19

Chart 12: Rating Agency Market Shares for U.S. ABS Issued in 2016, 2017, and 

First Half of 2018.............................................................................................21

Chart 13: Rating Agency Market Shares for U.S. MBS Issued in 2016, 2017, and 

First Half of 2018.............................................................................................21

Chart 14: Rating Agency Market Shares for U.S. CLO Issued in First Half of 2017 

and First Half of 2018 ......................................................................................21
 

1

ANNUAL REPORT ON NATIONALLY RECOGNIZED

STATISTICAL RATING ORGANIZATIONS

As Required by Section 6 of the Credit Rating Agency

Reform Act of 2006

I. INTRODUCTION

The staff (the “Staff”) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission” or 

“SEC”) is providing this report (“Report”) regarding nationally recognized statistical rating 

organizations (“NRSROs”) pursuant to Section 6 of the Credit Rating Agency Reform Act of 2006 

(“Rating Agency Act”).

1

 This Report reflects solely the Staff’s views. Section 6 of the Rating 

Agency Act requires the Commission to submit an annual report (“Annual Report”) to the Committee 

on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the U.S. Senate and the Committee on Financial Services 

of the U.S. House of Representatives that, with respect to the year to which the Annual Report relates:

 identifies applicants for registration as NRSROs under Section 15E of the Securities 

Exchange Act of 1934 (as amended, the “Exchange Act”);2

 specifies the number of, and actions taken on, such applications; and

 specifies the views of the Commission on the state of competition, transparency, and 

conflicts of interest among NRSROs.

This Report generally focuses on the period from June 26, 2017 to June 25, 2018 (the 

“Report Period”). In addition to addressing the items specified in Section 6 of the Rating 

Agency Act, this Report provides an overview of certain Commission and Staff activities 

relating to NRSROs. 

Information regarding the topics covered in this Report with respect to prior periods can 

be found on the Office of Credit Ratings (“OCR” or the “Office”) page of the Commission’s 

website.3

 1 Pub. L. No. 109-291, 120 Stat. 1327 (Sept. 29, 2006). The Rating Agency Act, among other things, added 

Section 15E to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to establish self-executing requirements on NRSROs

and provide the Commission with the authority to implement a registration and oversight program for 

NRSROs. In June 2007, the Commission approved rules implementing such a program. See Oversight of 

Credit Rating Agencies Registered as Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations, Release No. 

34-55857, 72 FR 33564 (Jun. 18, 2007), available at https://www.sec.gov/rules/final/2007/34-55857.pdf.

2 Unless otherwise noted, all references to specific statutory sections and rules in this Report are to sections 

in the Exchange Act and related rules.

3 Prior Annual Reports can be found under “Annual Reports to Congress” in the “Reports and Studies” 

section of the OCR webpage, available at http://www.sec.gov/ocr. 
 

2

II. STATUS OF REGISTRANTS AND APPLICANTS

Section 3(a)(62) defines a “nationally recognized statistical rating organization” as a 

credit rating agency that is registered under Section 15E and issues credit ratings certified by 

qualified institutional buyers, in accordance with Section 15E(a)(1)(B)(ix), with respect to: 

(i) financial institutions, brokers, or dealers; 

(ii) insurance companies; 

(iii) corporate issuers; 

(iv) issuers of asset-backed securities (as that term is defined in 17 CFR 229.1101(c)); 

(v) issuers of government securities, municipal securities, or securities issued by a 

foreign government; or 

(vi) a combination of one or more categories of obligors described in any of clauses 

(i) through (v) above.

As of the date of this Report, there are ten credit rating agencies registered as NRSROs. 

The NRSROs, categories of credit ratings described in clauses (i) through (v) of Section

3(a)(62)(A) in which they are registered, and locations of their principal offices, as of the date of 

this Report, are listed below:4

NRSRO Categories of Credit Ratings Principal Office

A.M. Best Rating Services, Inc. 

(“A.M. Best”) (ii), (iii), and (iv) U.S.

DBRS, Inc. 

(“DBRS”) (i) through (v) U.S.

Egan-Jones Ratings Company 

(“EJR”) (i) through (iii) U.S.

Fitch Ratings, Inc. 

(“Fitch”) (i) through (v) U.S.

HR Ratings de México, S.A. de C.V.

(“HR Ratings”) (i), (iii), and (v) Mexico

Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd.

(“JCR”) (i), (ii), (iii), and (v) Japan

Kroll Bond Rating Agency, Inc.

(“KBRA”) (i) through(v) U.S.

Moody’s Investors Service, Inc.

(“Moody’s”) (i) through (v) U.S.

Morningstar Credit Ratings, LLC

(“Morningstar”) (i), (iii), and (iv) U.S.

S&P Global Ratings

(“S&P”) (i) through (v) U.S.

For purposes of this Report only, we refer to Fitch, Moody’s, and S&P as larger NRSROs 

and the seven other NRSROs (A.M. Best, DBRS, EJR, HR Ratings, JCR, KBRA, and 

Morningstar) as smaller NRSROs.

 4 See the current Form NRSRO on each NRSRO’s website for any updates to this information.
 

3

Applications for initial registration and for registration by current NRSROs in additional 

rating categories are filed on Form NRSRO (“Form NRSRO”).5

 In addition, Section 15E(b) 

requires NRSROs to promptly amend Form NRSRO if any information or document provided 

therein becomes materially inaccurate. This section also requires NRSROs to annually amend 

Form NRSRO to update ratings count and performance information, certify the continuing 

accuracy of the information and documents provided therein, and list any material change thereto 

during the previous calendar year. OCR Staff review such amendments to Forms NRSRO in 

light of the requirements of Section 15E(b), Rule 17g-1, and the instructions to Form NRSRO.

During the Report Period, EJR filed with the Commission an application to re-register in 

the asset-backed securities and government securities credit ratings classes.6

 On July 9, 2018, 

the Commission issued an order instituting proceedings pursuant to Section 15E(a)(2)(A)(ii) to 

determine whether EJR’s application should be granted or denied.7

 On November 2, 2018, the 

Commission issued an order dismissing the proceedings in response to EJR’s motion to dismiss 

the proceedings following EJR’s voluntary withdrawal of its application.8

No other complete applications for initial registration as an NRSRO or for registration by 

current NRSROs in additional rating categories were received during the Report Period. 

III. ACTIVITIES RELATING TO NRSROs 

A. Activities

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank Act”)9

mandated the creation of OCR. OCR is responsible for the oversight of credit rating agencies 

registered with the Commission as NRSROs. OCR’s Staff includes professionals with expertise 

 5 See Section 15E(a) and Rule 17g-1. Rule 17g-1 requires an applicant/NRSRO to use Form NRSRO for the 

following, as applicable:

 an initial application to be registered as an NRSRO; 

 an application to register for an additional class of credit ratings; 

 an application supplement; 

 an update of registration pursuant to Section 15E(b)(1); 

 an annualcertification pursuant to Section 15E(b)(2); and 

 a withdrawal of registration pursuant to Section15E(e).

See also Form NRSRO, available at http://www.sec.gov/about/forms/formnrsro.pdf. 

6 EJR had previously been registered in such ratings classes. See Order Granting Registration of Egan-Jones Rating 

Company to Add Two Additional Classes of Credit Ratings,Release No. 34-59056 (Dec. 4, 2008), available at 

https://www.sec.gov/rules/other/2008/34-59056.pdf. On January 22, 2013, EJR and its founder Sean Egan 

consented to a Commission order under which, among other things, EJR agreed to be barred from rating assetbacked and government securities issuers as an NRSRO, with the right to re-apply for registration in these classes 

after 18 months from the date of the order. See In the Matter of Egan-Jones Ratings Company and Sean Egan, 

Release No. 34-68703 (Jan. 22, 2013), available at http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2013/34-68703.pdf.

7 See Order Instituting Administrative Proceedings Pursuant to Section 15E(a)(2)(A)(ii) of the Securities Exchange 

Act of 1934 and Notice of Hearing, Release No. 34-83610 (July 9, 2018), available at 

https://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2018/34-83610.pdf. 

8 See Order Dismissing Proceedings, Release No. 34-84530 (Nov. 2, 2018), available at 

https://www.sec.gov/litigation/opinions/2018/34-84530.pdf. 

9 See Pub. L. No. 111-203, 124 Stat. 1376 (2010).
 

4

in a variety of areas that relate to its regulatory mission, such as corporate, municipal, and 

structured debt finance.10

OCR’s responsibilities – as mandated by the Dodd-Frank Act – include, among other 

things, conducting an examination of each NRSRO at least annually in eight specified review 

areas.

11 Information regarding the examinations is included in OCR’s annual examination 

reports.

12

OCR also monitors trends and developments affecting the credit rating industry. For 

example, OCR Staff may meet with NRSROs to discuss rating and industry developments and 

with the boards of directors of NRSROs to discuss, among other things, compliance and 

oversight matters. OCR Staff also may meet with a variety of other market participants, 

including investors, issuers, regulators, and industry organizations, to discuss matters relevant to 

the credit rating industry.

During the Report Period, OCR Staff continued to participate in meetings that involved 

rating agency regulators globally, including those of the supervisory colleges that were formed 

for the largest internationally-active credit rating agencies. The supervisory colleges were 

formed to enhance communication among credit rating agency regulators globally with respect 

to examinations of the relevant credit rating agencies.13 During the Report Period, each college 

held an in-person meeting and conducted quarterly calls. OCR Staff also conducted additional 

discussions with international regulators as appropriate.

B. Commission Orders and Releases and Staff Publications

The Commission and the Staff, as applicable, issued the following orders, releases, and 

publications relating to NRSROs or credit ratings in general from the start of the Report Period 

to November 30, 2018:

 Order Dismissing Proceedings, Release No. 34-84530 (Nov. 2, 2018).14 The 

Commission issued an order dismissing the proceedings to determine whether EJR’s 

application for registration in the asset-backed securities and government securities credit 

ratings classes should be granted or denied. The Commission issued the order in 

response to EJR’s motion to dismiss the proceedings following EJR’s voluntary 

withdrawal of its application. 

 10 See Section 15E(p)(2) for a description of OCR staffing requirements.

11 See Section 15E(p)(3) for a description of the scope of the required examinations.

12 The examination reports can be found under “Summary Examination Reports” in the “Reports and Studies” 

section of the OCR webpage, available at http://www.sec.gov/ocr.

13 See Supervisory Colleges for Credit Rating Agencies, Final Report (July 2013), available at 

http://www.iosco.org/library/pubdocs/pdf/IOSCOPD416.pdf. The SEC serves as chair of the colleges for 

S&P and Moody’s, and OCR Staff represents the SEC in this regard. The European Securities and Markets 

Authority serves as chair of the college for Fitch.

14 Available at https://www.sec.gov/litigation/opinions/2018/34-84530.pdf.
 

5

 Proposed Amendments to Rules for Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating 

Organizations, Release No. 34-84289 (Sept. 26, 2018), 83 FR 50297 (Oct. 5, 2018).

15 

The Commission proposed an amendment to Rule 17g-5(a)(3) that would provide for an 

exemption from the rule with respect to credit ratings for certain structured finance 

products where the issuer is a non-U.S. person and the NRSRO has a reasonable basis to 

conclude that the structured finance product will be offered and sold exclusively outside 

the United States. The Commission also proposed conforming amendments to similar 

exemptions in Rule 17g-7(a) and Rule 15Ga-2.

 Orders Instituting Cease-and-Desist Proceedings. On August 28, 2018, the Commission 

issued the following orders pertaining to proceedings regarding certain rating practices at 

Moody’s:

o Order Instituting Cease-and-Desist Proceedings Pursuant to Section 21C of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Making Findings, and Imposing a Cease-andDesist Order, Release No. 34-83965 (Aug. 28, 2018).16 The Commission 

instituted settled administrative proceedings against Moody’s concerning its 

internal control structure with regard to the use of certain models in its 

methodology for rating residential mortgage-backed securities.

o Order Instituting Cease-and-Desist Proceedings Pursuant to Section 21C of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial 

Sanctions and a Cease-and-Desist Order, Release No. 34-83966 (Aug. 28, 

2018).17 The Commission instituted settled administrative proceedings against 

Moody’s concerning its policies and procedures designed to define and 

consistently apply credit rating symbols.

 Order Granting Temporary Conditional Exemption for Japan Credit Rating Agency, Ltd. 

from Certain Requirements of Section 15E(t) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 

Release No. 34-83884 (Aug. 17, 2018).18 The Commission granted JCR a temporary, 

conditional exemption from certain corporate governance requirements under Section 

15E(t). The exemption expires on August 20, 2021 and thereafter renews until August 

20, 2023, unless the Commission determines otherwise.

 Final Rule: Disclosure Update and Simplification, Release Nos. 33-10532, 34-83875, 

and IC-33203 (Aug. 17, 2018), 83 FR 50148 (Oct. 4, 2018).

19 The Commission adopted

amendments, effective November 5, 2018, to certain disclosure requirements that have 

become redundant, duplicative, overlapping, outdated, or superseded, in light of other 

Commission disclosure requirements, U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles 

(“U.S. GAAP”), or changes in the information environment. The amendments include a 

change to Rule 17g-3 to conform the financial statement reporting requirements 

applicable to NRSROs to U.S. GAAP.

 15 Available at https://www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/2018/34-84289.pdf. 

16 Available at https://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2018/34-83965.pdf. 

17 Available at https://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2018/34-83966.pdf. 

18 Available at https://www.sec.gov/rules/exorders/2018/34-83884.pdf. 

19 Available at https://www.sec.gov/rules/final/2018/33-10532.pdf. 
 

6

 Order Instituting Administrative Proceedings Pursuant to Section 15E(a)(2)(A)(ii) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Notice of Hearing, Release No. 34-83610 (July 9, 

2018).20 The Commission issued an order instituting proceedings pursuant to Section 

15E(a)(2)(A)(ii) to determine whether EJR’s application for registration in the assetbacked securities and government securities credit ratings classes should be granted or 

denied.

 Order Granting an Extension of Time to File Audited Financial Statements of DBRS 

Ratings Limited in Accordance With Exchange Act Rule 17g-3(a)(1), Release No. 34-

82787 (Feb. 27, 2018).21 The Commission granted DBRS an extension of time to file 

with the Commission in accordance with Rule 17g-3(a)(1) the audited financial 

statements of its credit rating affiliate DBRS Ratings Limited for the fiscal year ended 

November 30, 2017.

 Order Extending Conditional Temporary Exemption for Nationally Recognized 

Statistical Rating Organizations from Requirements of Rule 17g-5(a)(3) under the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Release No. 34-82144 (Nov. 22, 2017), 82 FR 56309 

(Nov. 28, 2017).22 The Commission extended the order exempting NRSROs from 

complying with Rule 17g-5(a)(3) with respect to credit ratings for certain structured 

finance products where the issuer is a non-U.S. person and the NRSRO has a reasonable

basis to conclude that the structured finance product will be offered and sold only in 

transactions outside the United States, until the earlier of (i) December 2, 2019, or (ii) the 

compliance date set forth in any final rule that may be adopted by the Commission that 

provides for a similar exemption.

 2017 Summary Report of Commission Staff’s Examinations of Each Nationally 

Recognized Statistical Rating Organization, dated December 2017, as required under 

Section 15E(p)(3)(C). 23 The report summarizes essential findings of the examinations 

conducted by Staff under Section 15E(p)(3)(C), generally focusing on the period from 

January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016.

 Annual Report on Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations, dated 

December 2017, as required by Section 6 of the Rating Agency Act.24 The Annual 

Report addresses the matters described in the first paragraph under Section I. of this 

Report, generally covering the period from June 26, 2016 to June 25, 2017. 

 20 Available at https://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2018/34-83610.pdf.

21 Available at https://www.sec.gov/rules/other/2018/34-82787.pdf. 

22 Available at https://www.sec.gov/rules/exorders/2017/34-82144.pdf. 

23 Available at https://www.sec.gov/ocr/reports-and-publications/special-studies/nrsro-summary-report2017.pdf.

24 Available at https://www.sec.gov/ocr/reportspubs/annual-reports/2017-annual-report-on-nrsros.pdf.
 

7

IV. COMPETITION

A. Select NRSRO Statistics 

Sections 1. through 3. below summarize and discuss certain information reported by 

NRSROs on Form NRSRO or pursuant to Rule 17g-3 that provides insight into the state of 

competition among NRSROs. While this information indicates that Moody’s, S&P, and Fitch 

continue to account for the highest percentages of outstanding ratings, other information 

suggests that smaller NRSROs have gained market share in certain asset classes.25

1. NRSRO Credit Ratings Outstanding

(a) Number of Outstanding Ratings in Statutory Rating Categories

Each NRSRO annually reports the number of credit ratings outstanding, as of the end of 

the preceding calendar year, in each rating category for which it is registered.26 This 

information, for the calendar year ending December 31, 2017, is summarized in Charts 1 through 

4 below and can be useful in determining the breadth of an NRSRO’s coverage with respect to 

issuers, obligors, and securities or money market instruments within a particular rating category.

Chart 1 depicts the number of credit ratings each NRSRO had outstanding in each rating 

category for which it was registered as of December 31, 2017. Chart 2 shows the percentage of 

credit ratings each NRSRO had outstanding across all rating categories and also breaks out the 

percentages for each NRSRO in each of the rating categories. Chart 3 illustrates the relative size 

of each rating category based on the aggregate number of ratings reported outstanding by all 

NRSROs. Chart 4 depicts the percentage of ratings each NRSRO had outstanding across all 

rating categories other than the government securities category.

Comparing the number of ratings outstanding for established NRSROs and newer 

NRSROs may not provide as comprehensive a picture of the state of competition as comparing 

the number of ratings issued by such NRSROs in a given period. Certain NRSROs (particularly 

the larger NRSROs) have a longer history of issuing ratings and their ratings include those for 

debt obligations and obligors that were rated well before the establishment of the newer 

entrants.27 Consequently, the information described in Section IV.B.1. of this Report (relating to 

 25 As discussed in Section IV.B.1. of this Report, information available on the websites of Commercial 

Mortgage Alert (https://www.cmalert.com/) and Asset-Backed Alert (https://www.abalert.com/) regarding 

NRSRO market shares in the asset-backed securities category indicates that some of the smaller NRSROs 

have developed significant market shares in such category over the past few years. In addition, Section 

IV.B.2. of this Report provides examples of certain asset classes in which it has been reported that smaller 

NRSROs have gained market share. 

26 Annual certifications on Form NRSRO must be filed with the Commission on EDGAR pursuant to Rule 

17g-1(f) and made publicly and freely available on each NRSRO’s website pursuant to Rule 17g-1(i). The 

number of outstanding credit ratings for each rating category for which an NRSRO is registered is reported 

on Item 7A of Form NRSRO. 

27 The ratings counts disclosed on Item 7A of Form NRSRO include outstanding credit ratings, regardless of 

when they were issued. As a result, the ratings counts of the more established NRSROs may include credit 

ratings that were issued before the newer entrants began issuing credit ratings. These earlier ratings will 

continue to be included in the disclosed ratings counts until the rated securities are repaid or the credit 

ratings are otherwise withdrawn. Because outstanding ratings are included in the ratings counts, historical 

results factor significantly into the disclosed number of ratings, making it more difficult to discern currentyear trends and identify gains achieved by the newer entrants. 
 

8

recent market share developments in the asset-backed securities rating category) may provide 

additional insight regarding how newer entrants are competing with more established rating 

agencies, specifically in the asset-backed securities rating category. 

There are additional limitations to assessing the state of competition in each rating 

category and in the aggregate based on the number of outstanding ratings. For instance, some 

NRSROs have pursued business strategies to specialize in particular rating categories or subcategories28 and may not desire to issue ratings in certain of the other NRSRO rating categories. 

Also, the reported information does not reflect any credit ratings being issued by NRSROs in 

rating categories in which they are not registered with the Commission, nor does it reflect ratings 

issued by an affiliate of an NRSRO unless the affiliate is identified as a credit rating affiliate on 

Item 3 of Form NRSRO. 

Further, the outstanding ratings reported by the NRSROs are based on their own 

determinations of the applicable categories and number of ratings, which are not necessarily 

consistent among NRSROs. In addition, to the extent NRSROs have adjusted their ratings count 

disclosures in accordance with the amended instructions to Form NRSRO, it may be more 

difficult to draw comparisons to ratings counts disclosed in prior years.29

Chart 1 provides the number of outstanding credit ratings reported by each NRSRO in its 

annual certification for the calendar year ending December 31, 2017, in each of the five 

categories identified in Section 3(a)(62) for which the NRSRO is registered, as applicable. 

 28 For example, A.M. Best has traditionally focused on credit ratings with respect to insurance companies and 

their affiliates.

29 Effective January 1, 2015, Item 7A of Form NRSRO and the corresponding instructions were amended to 

clarify the manner in which the number of outstanding credit ratings should be calculated and presented. 

The clarifying amendments are designed to ensure that disclosures on Item 7A of Form NRSRO are 

consistent across NRSROs. The change in instructions may have caused some NRSROs to modify the way 

they count ratings for purposes of Item 7A of Form NRSRO, which may affect comparisons to disclosures 

made in prior years. See Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations, Release No. 34-72936 

(Aug. 27, 2014), 79 FR 55077 (Sept. 15, 2014) at 55220-22 (discussing the clarifying amendments to Item 

7A of Form NRSRO).
 

9

Chart 1: Number of Outstanding Credit Ratings as of December 31, 2017 by Rating Category*

NRSRO Financial 

Institutions

Insurance 

Companies

Corporate 

Issuers

Asset-Backed 

Securities

Government 

Securities

Total 

Ratings 

A.M. Best N/R 7,191 1,079 5 N/R 8,275

DBRS 12,730 164 2,938 14,951 18,865 49,648

EJR 9,446 864 6,420 N/R N/R 16,730

Fitch 39,189 3,261 18,933 29,108 205,674 296,165

HR Ratings 560 N/R 184 N/R 374 1,118

JCR 839 59 2,464 N/R 440 3,802

KBRA 838 32 0 8,110 72 9,052

Moody's 36,631 2,484 28,635 59,320 598,614 725,684

Morningstar 44 N/R 297 2,530 N/R 2,871

S&P 57,091 6,496 51,213 43,760 920,306 1,078,866

Total 157,368 20,551 112,163 157,784 1,744,345 2,192,211

* N/R indicates that the NRSRO was not registered in the applicable rating category as of the reporting date. 

Source: NRSRO annual certifications for the 2017calendar year, Item 7A on Form NRSRO

Chart 2 displays the percentage of each NRSRO’s outstanding credit ratings of the total 

outstanding credit ratings of all NRSROs, for each rating category in which the NRSRO was 

registered, based on information reported by the NRSROs as of December 31, 2017.

30 

Chart 2: Percentage by Rating Category of Each NRSRO’s Outstanding Credit Ratings of the Total 

Outstanding Credit Ratings of all NRSROs, as of December 31, 2017*

NRSRO Financial 

Institutions

Insurance 

Companies

Corporate 

Issuers

Asset-Backed 

Securities

Government 

Securities

Total 

Ratings 

A.M. Best N/R 35.0% 1.0% <0.1% N/R 0.4%

DBRS 8.1% 0.8% 2.6% 9.5% 1.1% 2.3%

EJR 6.0% 4.2% 5.7% N/R N/R 0.8%

Fitch 24.9% 15.9% 16.9% 18.4% 11.8% 13.5%

HR Ratings 0.4% N/R 0.2% N/R 0.0% 0.1%

JCR 0.5% 0.3% 2.2% N/R 0.0% 0.2%

KBRA 0.5% 0.2% 0.0% 5.1% 0.0% 0.4%

Moody's 23.3% 12.1% 25.5% 37.6% 34.3% 33.1%

Morningstar <0.1% N/R 0.3% 1.6% N/R 0.1%

S&P 36.5% 31.6% 45.7% 27.7% 52.8% 49.2%

* N/R indicates that the NRSRO was not registered in the applicable rating category as of the reporting date. 

Percentages have been rounded to the nearest one-tenth of one percent.

Source: NRSRO annual certifications for the 2017calendar year, Item 7A on Form NRSRO

 30 For example, according to Chart 1, A.M. Best reported that it had 7,191 insurance company credit ratings, 

and the total of the credit ratings in that category reported by all NRSROs was 20,551. Dividing 7,191 by

20,551 equals (approximately) 0.350 or 35.0% (which is the percentageof NRSRO insurance company 

ratings attributable to A.M. Best, as shown on Chart 2).
 

10

As illustrated in Chart 2, the larger NRSROs account for 95.8% of all the ratings 

outstanding as of December 31, 2017—slightly lower than their 96.4% share as of December 31, 

2016.

31 The share of outstanding credit ratings that were issued by the larger NRSROs 

decreased in each category, most significantly in the asset-backed securities category and the 

financial institutions category, which decreased by 3.7% and 3.4%, respectively. 

Notably, Chart 2 also shows that A.M. Best, one of the smaller NRSROs, had the most 

credit ratings outstanding in the insurance category. A.M. Best has consistently reported being 

one of the top three issuers of insurance ratings.32

Chart 3 depicts the percentages of outstanding credit ratings attributable to each rating 

category, based on information reported by the NRSROs as of December 31, 2017. 

Chart 3: Breakdown of Ratings Reported Outstanding on December 31, 2017*

* Percentages have been rounded to the nearest one-tenth of one percent.

Source: NRSRO annual certifications for the 2017 calendar year, Item 7A on Form NRSRO

As illustrated by Chart 3, as of December 31, 2017, a large proportion of the aggregate 

credit ratings reported to be outstanding were in the government securities category, which may 

be attributable to the large number of government bond issuers and their multiple debt offerings. 

The government securities category accounted for 79.6% of the total number of credit ratings 

reported across all categories and, as shown on Chart 2, is also the most concentrated rating 

category, with Moody’s and S&P accounting for 87.1% of all outstanding government ratings. 

 31 In 2007, the year when NRSROs began reporting outstanding ratings on Form NRSRO, these three NRSROs 

accounted for 98.8% of all outstanding ratings.

32 See Annual Reports for prior years, which can be found under “Annual Reports to Congress” in the “Reports and 

Studies” section of the OCR webpage, available at http://www.sec.gov/ocr.

Financial Institutions

7.2%

Insurance 

Companies

0.9%

Corporate 

Issuers

5.1%

Asset-Backed 

Securities

7.2%

Govt, Muni & 

Sovereign

79.6%
 

11

Chart 4 depicts the percentages of the credit ratings outstanding that are attributable to 

each NRSRO over all the rating categories other than the government securities category, based 

on information reported by the NRSROs as of December 31, 2017.

Chart 4: Breakdown of Non-Government Securities Ratings Reported Outstanding on December 31, 2017*

* Percentages have been rounded to the nearest one-tenth of one percent.

Source: NRSRO annual certifications for the 2017 calendar year, Item 7A on Form NRSRO

A comparison of Chart 4 to Chart 2 (which shows each NRSRO’s share of outstanding 

ratings over all the rating categories, including government securities) illustrates that there is less 

concentration in the non-government securities rating categories. S&P’s and Moody’s 

percentage share of all outstanding ratings declines by 13.8 and 4.7 percentage points, 

respectively, when government securities are excluded. Fitch’s percentage share of outstanding 

ratings, on the other hand, increases by 6.7 percentage points when government securities are 

excluded. The percentage share for all the remaining NRSROs also increases when government 

securities are excluded. 

Further, when government securities are included in the total calculation, each of the 

smaller NRSROs except for one (i.e., DBRS) has less than 1.0% of all outstanding ratings, 

making it difficult to assess their relative market shares. When government securities are 

excluded, a clearer picture of the relative percentage shares of the smaller NRSROs can be 

observed, as illustrated in Chart 4. For most smaller NRSROs, their percentage share for all 

rating categories other than government securities as of December 31, 2017 did not change 

significantly compared to their percentage share as of December 31, 2016.33 DBRS saw the 

most significant increase of a smaller NRSRO in its share of outstanding ratings for all rating 

categories other than government securities over this time period, increasing from 4.8% as of 

 33 A comparison of Chart 4 in this Report with Chart 4 in Section IV.A.1.(a) of the December 2017 Annual Report 

(available at https://www.sec.gov/ocr/reportspubs/annual-reports/2017-annual-report-on-nrsros.pdf) shows that 

five of the seven smaller NRSROs had total market shares (excluding government securities) as of December 31, 

2017 within 0.2% of such market shares as of December 31, 2016.

A.M. Best 

1.8%

DBRS

6.9%

EJR 

Fitch 3.7%

20.2%

HR Ratings

0.2%

JCR

0.8%

KBRA

2.0%

Moody's 

28.4%

Morningstar

0.6%

S&P

35.4%
 

12

December 31, 2016 to 6.9% as of December 31, 2017. KBRA’s share of outstanding ratings for 

all rating categories other than government securities also increased from 1.3% as of December 

31, 2016 to 2.0% as of December 31, 2017. 

As discussed above, Charts 1 through 4 reflect the number of credit ratings outstanding 

as of December 31, 2017, which may include credit ratings that were issued years ago. As a 

result, the measure may not be indicative of the current market position of each NRSRO with 

respect to newly issued credit ratings. For a discussion of recent market share developments in 

the asset-backed securities rating category and other developments that could impact NRSRO 

market share, see Section IV.B. of this Report.

(b) Industry Concentration

Economists generally measure industry concentration, which indicates the 

competitiveness of an industry, by using the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (“HHI”). 34 The 

inverse of the HHI (“HHI Inverse”) can be used to represent the number of firms with equal 

market share necessary to replicate the degree of concentration in a particular industry.35 In 

other words, an industry with an HHI Inverse of 3.0 has a concentration that is equal to an 

industry where the entire market is evenly divided among three firms with a market share of one 

third each. A highly concentrated market will have a low HHI Inverse, whereas an 

unconcentrated market will have a high HHI Inverse.36

Calculations of the HHI and HHI Inverse for the NRSRO industry are consistent with the 

results included in Section IV.A.1.(a) of this Report and further illustrate gains in market share 

made by smaller NRSROs in the asset-backed securities rating category. Based on the number 

of outstanding ratings included in such section,37 the HHI Inverse indicates that the NRSRO 

industry constitutes a “highly concentrated” market, and has the equivalent concentration of an 

industry with approximately 2.7 firms with equal market share. This is consistent with the high 

proportion of outstanding ratings that have been issued by the larger NRSROs, especially 

Moody’s and S&P. Although the industry remains highly concentrated, a comparison of the 

HHI Inverse calculations since 2008 shows that the asset-backed securities rating category and 

the financial institutions rating category have become less concentrated.

 34 See, e.g., U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, Horizontal Merger Guidelines

§5.3 (2010) (discussing how the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission use HHI to 

measure the impact of a merger on market concentration); however, since the HHI calculation does not take 

into account that multiple NRSROs may rate a single issue, different considerations may be applicable to 

the use of the HHI calculation for NRSROs. 

35 The HHI Inverse is calculatedby dividing 10,000 (i.e., the highest possible HHI) by the HHI. For 

additional discussion of the HHI Inverse, see VERA PAWLOWSKY-GLAHN & ANTONELLA BUCCIANTI, 

COMPOSITIONAL DATA ANALYSIS: THEORY AND APPLICATIONS (2011); Toby Roberts, When Bigger is 

Better: A Critique of the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index’s Use to Evaluate Mergers in Network Industries,

34 PACE L. REV. 894, 908 (2014).

36 A market with an HHI Inverse of less than 4.0 is considered to be highly concentrated; a market with an 

HHI Inverse between 4.0 and 6.67 is considered to be moderately concentrated; and a market with an HHI 

Inverse above 6.67 is considered to be unconcentrated. See generally U.S. Department of Justice and the 

Federal Trade Commission, Horizontal Merger Guidelines §5.3 (2010).

37 See Section IV.A.1.(a) of this Report for a discussion of certain limitations involved in determining the 

number of outstanding ratings reported.
 

13

Chart 5 reports the HHI Inverses calculated from 2008 to 2017 for the ratings outstanding 

(as reported by the NRSROs) in each rating category, in total for all rating categories, and in 

total for all rating categories excluding government securities. 

Chart 5: HHI Inverses for Each Rating Category*

Year

Financial 

Institutions

Insurance 

Companies

Corporate 

Issuers

AssetBacked 

Securities

Government 

Securities

Total (all 

rating 

categories)

Total 

(excluding 

government 

securities)

2008 3.72 4.05 3.79 2.82 2.83 2.99 3.56

2009 3.85 3.84 3.18 3.18 2.65 2.86 3.58

2010 3.99 3.37 3.17 3.20 2.69 2.88 3.55

2011 4.16 3.76 3.02 3.38 2.47 2.74 3.70

2012 4.04 3.72 3.00 3.44 2.50 2.75 3.68

2013 3.99 3.68 3.03 3.48 2.46 2.72 3.65

2014 4.30 3.83 3.35 3.34 2.40 2.68 3.81

2015 3.72 3.82 3.23 3.53 2.40 2.65 3.67

2016 3.75 3.82 3.26 3.68 2.40 2.67 3.78

2017 3.88 3.79 3.26 3.79 2.44 2.70 3.94

* The number of credit rating agencies registered as NRSROs varies by category and can change over time, 

potentially affecting comparisons across categories and with prior years. For example, Morningstar and HR 

Ratings each registered and had outstanding ratings in the financial institutions and corporate issuers 

categories in 2016, contributing to the increase in the HHI Inverse in these categories compared to the prior 

year.

Source: NRSRO annual certifications for the 2008-17 calendar years, Item 7A on Form NRSRO

As noted in Section IV.A.1.(a) of this Report, as of December 31, 2017, the government 

securities rating category (which includes sovereigns, U.S. public finance, and international 

public finance) was the category with the most ratings (comprising approximately 79.6% of all 

ratings outstanding). Given the disproportionate size of the government securities rating 

category relative to the other rating categories and the high concentration of NRSROs rating 

government securities,38 the inclusion of the government securities category in the calculation of 

the aggregate HHI Inverse may make it difficult to assess the overall level of market 

concentration in the other four rating categories. Chart 5 therefore also includes the HHI Inverse 

for these four rating categories in the aggregate. When the government securities rating category 

is excluded, the total HHI inverse with respect to the four remaining rating categories increases 

to 3.94. Though still highly concentrated,39 this reflects the lowest concentration (i.e., the 

highest HHI Inverse and greatest historical competition) since NRSROs began reporting 

information regarding the number of ratings outstanding on Form NRSRO.

Industry concentration in the asset-backed securities category is also at its lowest point 

since NRSROs began reporting information regarding the number of ratings outstanding on 

Form NRSRO. This may reflect increased competition from some of the smaller NRSROs that 

have focused on rating securities in this category (see Section IV.B. of this Report for a 

discussion of recent NRSRO market shares in the asset-backed securities category). The other 

 38 As shown in Chart 5, the government securities category has an HHI Inverse of 2.44, which is significantly lower 

than the other categories, illustrating its status as the most concentrated rating category.

39 See supra note 36.
 

14

rating categories were more concentrated in 2017 than they were in 2008, except for the financial 

institutions rating category, which is slightly less concentrated than in 2008.

2. NRSRO Analytical Staffing Levels

Chart 6 reports the number of credit analysts (including credit analyst supervisors) and 

the number of credit analyst supervisors employed by each of the NRSROs, as reported on 

Exhibit 8 of Form NRSRO.40 

Chart 6: NRSRO Credit Analysts and Credit Analyst Supervisors

NRSRO

Credit Analysts 

(Including Credit 

Analyst Supervisors)

Credit Analyst 

Supervisors

A.M. Best 144 47

DBRS 287 59

EJR 16 9

Fitch 1,176 310

HR Ratings 49 7

JCR 62 31

KBRA 144 28

Moody's 1,595 238

Morningstar 77 16

S&P 1,582 129

Total 5,132 874

Source: NRSRO annual certifications for the 2017 calendar year, Exhibit 8 on Form NRSRO

The larger NRSROs report employing 4,353 credit analysts (including supervisors), 

which is approximately 84.8% of the total number employed by all of the NRSROs. Although 

the smaller NRSROs in the aggregate employ only approximately 15.2% of all credit analysts 

employed by NRSROs, this percentage has increased steadily in recent years.41 During this 

time, some of the smaller NRSROs have reported significant increases in their analytical staff.42 

The trend in the number of rating analysts employed by an NRSRO can indicate the state of the 

NRSRO’s business or its business outlook—i.e., NRSROs that are increasing their staff may be 

experiencing or anticipating an increase in ratings volumes or planning to enter new markets.

 40 Effective January 1, 2015, the instructions for Exhibit 8 of Form NRSRO were amended to clarify that 

NRSROs must include credit analyst supervisors in the total number of credit analysts disclosed on Exhibit 

8. This amendment was designed to enhance consistency ofthe disclosures on Exhibit 8 of Form NRSRO.

41 Based on reports by the currently-registered NRSROs on their annual certifications for the applicable 

calendar year, the smaller NRSROs employed approximately 11.4% of all NRSRO analysts in 2014, 12.8% 

of all NRSRO analysts in 2015, and 14.6% of all NRSRO analysts in 2016. 

42 For example, in its most recent annual certification, DBRS reported employing 287 credit analysts 

(including credit analyst supervisors), a 15.7% increase from the number of analysts reported on its annual 

certification for the prior year and nearly double the 150 analysts reported as of March 31, 2015.
 

15

3. NRSRO Revenue Growth

The total revenue reported to the Commission43 by all of the NRSROs for their 2017 

fiscal year was approximately $7.1 billion, which was higher by approximately $1.2 billion than 

the amount reported in the 2016 fiscal year. Chart 7 shows the percentage of total NRSRO 

revenues since 2014 that were accounted for by the larger NRSROs in the aggregate and by the 

smaller NRSROs in the aggregate.

Chart 7: NRSRO Revenue Information: Fiscal Year Percentage of Total Reported NRSRO Revenue

2014 2015 2016 2017

S&P, Fitch, 

and Moody’s 94.3% 93.7% 94.4% 94.1%

All Other 

NRSROs 5.7% 6.3% 5.6% 5.9%

Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Source: Financial reports provided to the Commission under Rule 17g-3(a)(3) for the fiscal years ended 2014-17. For the 

preparation of this Report, if an NRSRO reported revenue in a foreign currency, the revenue was converted to U.S. dollars 

using the average exchange rate over all U.S. banking days in the fiscal year of such NRSRO. 

Further revenue information is available for NRSROs that are owned, in whole or in part, 

by public companies. The following information is from the most recent annual reports of public 

companies with an ownership interest in an NRSRO:

• Moody’s Corporation, the owner of Moody’s, reported a 17% increase in revenues at 

Moody’s from the previous fiscal year, noting growth across all lines of business. 

Moody’s Corporation identified strong global leveraged finance rated issuance volumes as 

the primary driver of the increase in revenue and also noted growth in the banking sector 

and in collateralized loan obligation issuance. Additionally, Moody’s Corporation noted 

benefits from changes in the mix of fee type, new fee initiatives, and pricing increases as 

contributing to Moody’s revenue growth.44 

• S&P Global Inc. (“S&P Global”), which is S&P’s parent company, indicated that revenue 

at S&P increased by 18% compared to its 2016 results, attributed primarily to an increase 

in bank loan ratings revenue in the U.S. and Europe and an increase in corporate bond 

ratings revenue. S&P Global additionally highlighted an increase in structured finance 

revenue driven by increased U.S. collateral loan obligation and U.S. commercial 

mortgage-backed securities issuance, an increase in surveillance fees, and higher entity 

 43 Under Rule 17g-3(a)(3), each NRSRO is required to file annually with the Commission an unaudited report

providing revenue information, including revenue from determining and maintaining credit ratings, revenue 

from subscribers, revenue from granting licenses or rights to publish credit ratings, and revenue from other 

services and products. These reports are not required to be made publicly available.

44 See Moody’s Corporation Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, available 

at https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1059556/000119312518058986/d540752d10k.htm. 
 

16

credit ratings revenue as contributors to revenue growth. S&P Global also noted that the 

increase in revenue was partially offset by a decline in public finance revenue.45 

• Morningstar’s parent company, Morningstar, Inc., noted an increase of revenue at 

Morningstar primarily due to new-issue growth in asset-backed securities, which was 

partially offset by a slight decrease in ratings on commercial mortgage-backed 

securities.46

More recent regulatory filings of these entities have indicated a growth in revenue in the 

first half of 2018. Moody’s Corporation reported a 9% increase in revenue at Moody’s in the first 

half of 2018, as compared to the first half of 2017, identifying growth in the structured finance 

group and corporate finance group as well as the favorable impact of changes in the mix of fee 

type and pricing increases as contributing factors.47 S&P Global reported a 4% increase in 

revenue at S&P in the first half of 2018, as compared to the first half of 2017, and attributed the 

growth to an increase in surveillance fees, higher entity credit ratings revenue, and an increase in 

Rating Evaluation Service activity.48 Morningstar, Inc. indicated that revenue at Morningstar 

increased during both the first and second quarters of 2018, in each case as compared to the 

corresponding three-month period in 2017, due to new-issue growth in residential mortgagebacked securities and asset-backed securities.49

B. Recent Developments in the State of Competition among NRSROs 

1. Market Share Developments in the Asset-Backed Securities Rating 

Category

As noted in Section IV.A.1.(a) of this Report, the number of ratings recently issued by 

NRSROs may give a clearer picture of competition than the number of ratings each NRSRO currently 

has outstanding. For example, Chart 2 indicates that, as of December 31, 2017, the smaller NRSROs 

collectively have 16.2% of the ratings outstanding in the asset-backed securities rating category. 

However, the market share data discussed in Sections (a) and (b) below show that higher market share 

percentages have been obtained by smaller NRSROs in ratings issuance with respect to certain types 

of asset-backed securities. This market share data continues the growth trend the Staff has observed 

since the 2012 Annual Report for some smaller NRSROs in the asset-backed securities rating 

category. 

 45 See S&P Global Inc.Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, available at

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/64040/000006404018000061/spgi-20171231x10k.htm. 

46 See Morningstar, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, available at

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1289419/000128941918000008/morn_10kx12312017.htm.

47 See Moody’s Corporation Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2018, available at

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1059556/000119312518235267/d585104d10q.htm.

48 See S&P Global Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, for the period ended June 30, 2018, available at 

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/64040/000006404018000162/spgi-2018630x10q.htm. S&P describes 

its Rating Evaluation Service as an assessment of the potential credit impact of strategic or financial initiatives 

under consideration by an entity. See spratings.com, Ratings Evaluation Service (RES), 

https://www.spratings.com/en_US/products/-/product-detail/rating-evaluation-service-res-.

49 See Morningstar, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2018, available at

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1289419/000128941918000014/morn_10qx03312018.htm; 

Morningstar, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2018, available at

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1289419/000128941918000092/morn_10qx06302018.htm.
 

17

Sections (a) and (b) below discuss NRSRO market share information with respect to certain 

asset-backed securities, as reported on the Commercial Mortgage Alert and Asset-Backed Alert

websites. 50 Commercial Mortgage Alert and Asset-Backed Alert currently report NRSRO market 

share information on four categories of asset-backed securities: (i) CMBS;51 (ii) MBS;52 (iii) CLOs;53

and (iv) ABS.54

(a) CMBS

Charts 8 through 11 provide information concerning U.S.55 CMBS ratings by NRSROs, as 

reported in Commercial Mortgage Alert. NRSRO market share varies between the conduit CMBS and 

single borrower CMBS segments,56 the two segments that account for most of the non-agency57 U.S. 

 50 See Asset-Backed Alert website, available at https://www.abalert.com/ and Commercial Mortgage Alert

website, available at https://www.cmalert.com/. The information in Charts 8 through 14 is based on these 

websites as of September 13, 2018. Although the information available on these websites may provide 

insight into recent developments regarding the state of competition among NRSROs in the asset-backed 

securities rating category, it has certain limitations. For instance, the information is self-reported by 

NRSROs. In addition, the information is presented using the number of transactions with respect to which 

an NRSRO has reported issuing a credit rating and the aggregate dollar amount thereof, rather than 

indicating where an NRSRO may have rated fewer than all tranches of a particular transaction.

51 The “CMBS” category is comprised of transactions collateralized by mortgages or leases on commercial or 

multi-family income-producing properties (excluding commercial real estate collateralized debt 

obligations). See Commercial Mortgage Alert website, available at https://www.cmalert.com/.

52 The “MBS” category is comprised of securities secured by U.S. first-lien mortgages on residential 

properties (excluding Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac issues, securities secured by non-performing or reperforming mortgages, subprime mortgages, or mortgages financing single-family rental businesses, and 

refinancings of previously offered securities). See Asset-BackedAlert website, available at 

https://www.abalert.com/.

53 The “CLO” category is comprised of arbitrage collateralized loan obligations secured by broadly syndicated 

corporate loans and middle market collateralized loan obligations secured by loans to small to medium sized 

enterprises. Asset-BackedAlert included NRSRO market shares for the CLO category for the first time in the 

information reported for the first half of 2018. See id. 

54 The “ABS” category is comprised of securitiesthat are collateralized by assets of some kind (excluding the 

following: CMBS; MBS; Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac issues (other than risk transfer transactions); 

issuances by municipalities; tax exempt issues; issues that are fully retained by an affiliate of the deal 

sponsor; commercial paper and other continuously offered securities such as medium-term notes; CLOs 

and other collateralized debt obligations; and refinancings of previously offered securities). See id. 

55 References to “U.S.” CMBS, MBS, ABS, and CLO issuance and market shares in this Section IV.B.1. reflect 

securities issued for sale primarily in the U.S., which include securities issued publicly and those issued under 

Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). See Asset-Backed Alert website, 

available at https://www.abalert.com/; Commercial Mortgage Alertwebsite, available at

https://www.cmalert.com/.

56 The term “conduit” refers to a financial intermediary that functions as a link, or conduit, between the 

lender(s) originating loans and the ultimate investor(s). The conduit makes loans or purchases loans from 

third party correspondents under standardized underwritingparameters and once sufficient volume has 

accumulated, pools the loans for sale to investors in the CMBS market. See

https://www.crefc.org/uploadedFiles/Site_Framework/Industry_Resources/Glossary%20Revised%202014

%20-Update.pdf. In contrast, a single borrower transaction includes commercial mortgage loans made to a 

single borrower. 

57 “Non-agency” CMBS refers to CMBS that are not issued or guaranteed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, or Ginnie 

Mae. “Agency” CMBS generally refers to CMBS that are issued or guaranteed by such entities. 
 

18

CMBS transactions rated by NRSROs. The charts include reported market share information for total 

non-agency U.S. CMBS transactions,58 U.S. conduit CMBS transactions, U.S. single borrower CMBS 

transactions, and agency CMBS transactions59 for calendar year 2016, calendar year 2017, and the 

first half of calendar year 2018.

Chart 8: Rating Agency Market Share for Total Non-Agency U.S. CMBS Issued in 2016, 2017, and First Half of 

2018*

1H 

2017

Rank NRSRO

1H-2018

Issuance 

($Mil.)

No. of 

deals

Market

Share 

(%)

2017

Issuance 

($Mil.)

No. of 

deals

Market

Share 

(%)

2016

Issuance 

($Mil.)

No. of 

deals

Market

Share 

(%)

1 Fitch 27,286.8 33 67.4 59,146.5 75 62.0 53,161.7 72 70.0

2 KBRA 19,844.7 23 49.0 47,931.8 63 50.3 36,280.7 51 47.8

3 S&P 17,580.8 31 43.4 39,240.3 64 41.2 19,255.7 41 25.3

4 Moody’s 17,483.0 22 43.2 55,736.8 67 58.5 57,314.0 73 75.4

5 DBRS 12,048.5 20 29.8 26,755.3 37 28.1 17,549.1 26 23.1

6 Morningstar 4,646.7 9 11.5 12,024.5 25 12.6 14,516.6 27 19.1

Total Rated 

Market 40,482.9 64 95,343.3 196 75,967.3 166

Source: https://www.cmalert.com/rankings.pl?Q=78

Chart 9: Rating Agency Market Share for U.S. Conduit CMBS Issued in 2016, 2017, and First Half of 2018*

1H 

2018

Rank NRSRO

1H-2018

Issuance 

($Mil.)

No. of 

deals

Market

Share 

(%)

2017

Issuance 

($Mil.)

No. of 

deals

Market

Share 

(%)

2016

Issuance 

($Mil.)

No. of 

deals

Market

Share 

(%)

1 Fitch 19,682.2 21 99.2 48,522.9 52 100.0 46,388.8 54 96.6

2 KBRA 13,111.6 14 66.1 30,425.7 33 62.7 30,390.3 35 63.3

3 Moody’s 11,596.0 14 58.4 45,617.1 49 94.0 48,017.1 57 100.0

4 S&P 8,251.2 8 41.6 9,411.2 10 19.4 4,679.6 5 9.7

5 DBRS 6,735.6 8 33.9 17,918.3 19 36.9 13,755.6 17 28.6

6 Morningstar 0.0 0 0.0 2,175.6 2 4.5 6,443.1 8 13.4

Total Rated 

Market 19,847.2 22 48,522.9 52 48,017.1 57

Source: https://www.cmalert.com/rankings.pl?Q=78

* Charts 8 and 9 reflect market share percentages based on dollar amounts of issuance. The sum of the market share 

percentages exceeds 100% since more than one NRSRO may rate a particular transaction or obligor.

 58 Total U.S. CMBS ratings include conduit CMBS, single-borrower CMBS, and other types of CMBS, such 

as distressed/non-performing CMBS transactions and re-securitizations of CMBS transactions.

59 Only agency CMBS transactions with a rating from one or more NRSROs are included for determining NRSRO 

market share in the agency CMBS category. See Commercial Mortgage Alert website, available at 

https://www.cmalert.com/.
 

19

Chart 10: Rating Agency Market Share for U.S. Single Borrower CMBS Issued in 2016, 2017, and First Half 

of 2018*

1H 

2018

Rank NRSRO

1H-2018

Issuance 

($Mil.)

No. of 

deals

Market

Share 

(%)

2017

Issuance 

($Mil.)

No. of 

deals

Market

Share 

(%)

2016

Issuance 

($Mil.)

No. of 

deals

Market

Share 

(%)

1 S&P 8,959.5 22 45.1 26,301.6 45 72.1 12,667.0 30 65.5

2 Fitch 7,214.6 11 36.3 8,959.7 13 24.5 4,229.8 6 21.9

3 KBRA 6,733.1 9 33.9 14,864.9 17 40.7 4,598.7 10 23.8

4 Moody’s 5,887.0 8 29.6 9,038.3 12 24.8 8,528.9 13 44.1

5 DBRS 5,313.0 12 26.7 7,924.3 15 21.7 3,025.5 6 15.6

6 Morningstar 4,646.7 9 23.4 8,668.4 18 23.7 6,944.3 14 35.9

Total Rated 

Market 19,875.5 40 36,499.6 64 19,339.0 39

Source: https://www.cmalert.com/rankings.pl?Q=78

Chart 11: Rating Agency Market Share for AgencyCMBS Issued in 2016, 2017, and First Half of 2018*

1H 

2018

Rank NRSRO

1H-2018

Issuance 

($Mil.)

No. of 

deals

Market

Share 

(%)

2017

Issuance 

($Mil.)

No. of 

deals

Market

Share 

(%)

2016

Issuance 

($Mil.)

No. of 

deals

Market

Share 

(%)

1 Fitch 8,972.3 7 77.8 10,226.8 10 51.9 11,688.0 11 100.0

2 KBRA 6,110.0 5 53.0 11,488.7 10 58.3 5,378.2 5 46.0

3 Moody’s 2,553.0 2 22.2 4,717.5 5 23.9 0.0 0 0.0

4 DBRS 2,510.6 2 21.8 2,417.5 2 12.3 0.0 0 0.0

5 S&P 1,470.5 1 12.8 5,812.1 5 29.5 2,081.0 2 17.8

6 Morningstar 1,434.2 1 12.4 4,781.1 4 24.2 4,228.8 4 36.2

Total Rated 

Market 11,525.3 9 19,721.9 18 11,688.0 11

Source: https://www.cmalert.com/rankings.pl?Q=78

* Charts 10 and 11 reflect market share percentages based on dollar amounts of issuance. Thesum of the market share

percentages exceeds 100% since more than one NRSRO may rate a particular transaction or obligor.

As illustrated in Charts 8 through 10 above, some of the smaller NRSROs continue to 

report significant market shares in rating non-agency U.S. CMBS transactions. In both 2016 and 

2017, KBRA had the third highest non-agency U.S. CMBS market share of all NRSROs, and, in 

the first half of 2018, KBRA’s market share rose to the second highest. In each of these periods, 

KBRA rated approximately half of the overall non-agency U.S. CMBS transaction volume. 

DBRS also increased its overall non-agency U.S. CMBS market share in the first half of 2018 to 

29.8%.

S&P has continued to gain market share in the U.S. conduit CMBS segment after having 

been subject to a one-year timeout from marketing or rating new issue U.S. conduit CMBS 

transaction in accordance with a settlement, dated January 21, 2015, between S&P and the 

Commission regarding charges relating to S&P’s ratings on certain conduit transactions.60 It has 

been reported that, due to differences in Moody’s and S&P’s methodologies that result in 

 60 See In the Matter of Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services, Release Nos. 33-9705 and 34-74104 (Jan. 21, 2015), 

available at http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2015/33-9705.pdf.
 

20

varying credit enhancement requirements, conduit issuers tend to hire only one of the two firms 

to rate a transaction, frequently pairing the chosen firm with Fitch in order to satisfy investment 

guidelines of certain investors that require ratings from at least two of Moody’s, S&P, and 

Fitch. 61

The relative size of the U.S. single borrower segment has increased significantly in recent 

years and in the first half of 2018 accounted for just under half of all non-agency U.S. CMBS 

transactions.62 S&P retained a leading market share position in this segment in the first half of 

2018, but had a lower market share compared to prior years. The remaining NRSROs active in 

the U.S. single borrower segment (including DBRS, KBRA, and Morningstar) each had market 

shares greater than 23%. Reports indicate that Morningstar hopes to expand its business in this 

segment further as single-borrower issuers become more familiar with its recently published 

criteria for rating U.S. single borrower transactions.63

Chart 11 shows a relatively competitive landscape between the larger and smaller NRSROs 

with respect to credit ratings of agency CMBS transactions. Fitch and KBRA are the most active 

NRSROs in this segment, each having rated more than half of the transactions issued in 2017 and the 

first half of 2018. Though they have rated significantly fewer transactions than Fitch and KBRA, the 

two remaining smaller NRSROs have obtained market shares in this segment that are comparable to 

those of the remaining larger NRSROs.

(b) ABS/MBS

Charts 12 through 14 provide information concerning U.S. ABS, U.S. MBS, and U.S. CLO

ratings by NRSROs, as reported in Asset-Backed Alert. The charts include reported market share 

information for (i) U.S. ABS transactions and U.S. MBS transactions for calendar year 2016, calendar 

year 2017, and the first half of calendar year 2018 and (ii) U.S. CLO transactions for the first half of 

calendar years 2017 and 2018.64

 61 See Fitch Leads Rankings; S&P Gains on Moody’s, Commercial Mortgage Alert, July 20, 2018.

62 Among other factors, market participants have attributed the growth of issuance in the single borrower segment to 

favorable conditions in the bond market for securities that pay interest based on a floating rate. See SingleBorrower Deals Dominating Issuance, Commercial Mortgage Alert, Aug. 3, 2018. 

63 See id. Morningstar published distinct criteria for U.S. single borrower transactions during the Report Period. 

See Morningstar Credit Ratings, LLC Publishes New Methodology for U.S. Single-Asset/Single-Borrower 

Ratings, Morningstar Credit Ratings, LLC, June 1, 2018, available at 

https://ratingagency.morningstar.com/PublicDocDisplay.aspx?i=GX1XH4Gv88A%3d&m=i0Pyc%2bx7qZZ4%2

bsXnymazBA%3d%3d&s=LviRtUKXqs8kml5dHt7FTeE2SZmY0Fvqd4iX49Mk%2f9UapyiFTEO6TA%3d%3d.

64 As noted supra in note 53, Asset-Backed Alert only recently began reporting NRSRO market share for U.S. CLO 

transactions. Historical market share information for this category (i.e., prior to 2017, and for the full 2017 

calendar year) was not included with rankings published following the first half of calendar year 2018.
 

21

Chart 12: Rating Agency Market Shares for U.S. ABS Issued in 2016, 2017, and First Half of 2018*

1H 

2018

Rank NRSRO

1H-2018

Issuance 

($Mil.)

No. 

of 

deals

Market

Share 

(%)

2017

Issuance 

($Mil.)

No. of 

deals

Market

Share 

(%)

2016

Issuance 

($Mil.)

No. 

of 

deals

Market

Share 

(%)

1 S&P 94,711.6 146 55.0 161,248.6 243 57.1 125,432.7 202 56.5

2 Fitch 89,303.2 112 51.9 154,302.3 207 54.7 123,080.6 160 55.5

3 Moody’s 85,944.2 116 49.9 138,987.3 192 49.2 119,772.8 170 54.0

4 DBRS 39,881.2 72 23.2 68,316.1 133 24.2 46,139.3 117 20.8

5 KBRA 28,437.2 74 16.5 48,740.3 124 17.3 38,756.5 101 17.5

6 Morningstar 14,157.1 31 8.2 14,835.8 33 5.3 7,921.2 23 3.6

Total Rated 

Market 172,187.9 284 282,313.2 472 221,849.7 395

Source: https://www.abalert.com/rankings.pl?Q=102

Chart 13: Rating Agency Market Shares for U.S. MBS Issued in 2016, 2017, and First Half of 2018*

1H 

2018

Rank NRSRO

1H-2018

Issuance 

($Mil.)

No. 

of 

deals

Market

Share 

(%)

2017

Issuance 

($Mil.)

No. of 

deals

Market

Share 

(%)

2016

Issuance 

($Mil.)

No. 

of 

deals

Market

Share 

(%)

1 Moody’s 10,144.1 20 66.1 12,070.9 23 73.6 5,279.6 16 63.6

2 KBRA 7,456.1 16 48.6 6,967.5 15 42.5 3,008.4 9 36.2

3 DBRS 7,309.3 15 47.7 9,878.9 15 60.2 3,245.9 10 39.1

4 Fitch 6,240.2 12 40.7 6,694.4 9 40.8 3,478.4 12 41.9

5 S&P 3,917.8 5 25.5 3,114.5 4 19.0 1,216.0 4 14.6

6 Morningstar 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 585.6 4 7.1

Total Rated 

Market 15,339.4 30 16,402.7 29 8,300.5 29

Source: https://www.abalert.com/rankings.pl?Q=102

Chart 14: Rating Agency Market Shares for U.S. CLO Issued in First Half of 

2017 and First Half of 2018*

1H 

2018

Rank NRSRO

1H-2018

Issuance 

($Mil.)

No. 

of 

deals

Market

Share 

(%)

1H-2017

Issuance 

($Mil.)

No. of 

deals

Market

Share 

(%)

1 Moody’s 52,246.9 94 73.6 47,603.6 84 91.6

2 Fitch 51,982.5 93 73.2 34,401.1 62 66.2

3 S&P 31,866.3 57 44.9 20,293.9 35 39.1

4 Morningstar 4,504.5 6 6.3 5,085.7 7 9.8

5 DBRS 604.9 1 0.9 348.9 1 0.7

Total Rated 

Market 71,004.4 128 51,944.3 93

Source: https://www.abalert.com/rankings.pl?Q=102

* Charts 12 through 14reflect market share percentages based on dollar amounts of issuance. The sum of the market share

percentages exceeds 100% since more than one NRSRO may rate a particular transaction or obligor.
 

22

Chart 12 shows that smaller NRSROs, in particular DBRS and KBRA, have built significant 

market share rating U.S. ABS.65 DBRS has consistently attained a market share of over 20% in each 

of 2016, 2017, and the first half of 2018, and KBRA has maintained a market share of approximately 

17% during the same time period. Morningstar has also more than doubled its market share from 

3.6% in 2016 to 8.2% in the first half of 2018.

Chart 13 shows that ratings by KBRA and DBRS continue to represent a large portion of the 

U.S. MBS market, with the second and third, respectively, highest market shares in the first half of 

2018. 

Chart 14 shows that the larger NRSROs have the highest market shares in the U.S. CLO 

segment. However, Morningstar attained some market share in the U.S. CLO segment as well. 

Efforts by Morningstar and other smaller NRSROs to develop business in this segment are discussed 

in Section IV.B.2. of this Report. 

2. Other NRSRO Developments66

As described in Section IV.B.1. of this Report, some of the smaller NRSROs have reported 

market share gains in the asset-backed securities rating category. In particular, these NRSROs have 

had success rating asset-backed securities backed by discrete asset types, in particular newer or unique 

asset types. 

For instance, smaller NRSROs are significant raters of securities backed by unsecured 

consumer loans, including consumer loans originated through marketplace lending platforms. KBRA 

and DBRS had the two highest market shares in this category during the Report Period, rating 68.5% 

and 51.3%, respectively, of the transactions priced during such period.67

Another asset class, single family rental securitizations, is predominately rated by three 

NRSROs, including two smaller NRSROs. During the Report Period, issuers priced fourteen rated 

single family rental securitizations with an aggregate principal amount of $7.8 billion. Morningstar 

issued ratings on all but one of these transactions.68 KBRA also issued ratings on 88.8% of these 

transactions.69

An additional example of market share gains achieved by smaller NRSROs in discrete asset 

classes is KBRA’s rating of securitizations backed by aircraft-lease receivables. KBRA rated each of 

the fifteen aircraft-lease receivables transactions (with an aggregate principal amount of $9.2 billion) 

 65 See Section IV.B.2. of this Report for a discussion of specific ABS asset classes where the smaller NRSROs have 

reported success in gaining market share. 

66 Unless noted otherwise, all market share percentages in this Section IV.B.2. are based on dollar amounts of 

issuance. The information in this Section IV.B.2. from the Asset-Backed Alert database was obtained from the 

database available on the Asset-BackedAlert website on September 13, 2018. 

67 See Asset-Backed Alert database. The Asset-Backed Alert database indicates that 48 unsecured consumer loan 

transactions totaling $17.8 billion priced during the Report Period.

68 See id. 

69 See id. 
 

23

that priced during the Report Period.

70 KBRA has rated each aircraft-lease receivables transaction 

(twenty-seven in total) issued from December 2015 through the end of the Report Period.71

Smaller NRSROs have also been able to gain market share in rating more traditional types of 

asset-backed securities. DBRS has gained the largest market share among the smaller NRSROs with 

respect to the more traditional types of asset-backed securities (aside from the MBS and CMBS 

categories). For example, DBRS rated 58.6% of the transactions backed by student loans that priced 

during the Report Period.72 DBRS also rated a sizable minority of two of the largest asset-backed 

securities asset classes—i.e., credit card and prime auto loan transactions.73 DBRS rated 18.7% and 

13.5% of the credit card asset-backed securities and prime auto loan asset-backed securities, 

respectively, priced during the Report Period.74 

DBRS has also been able to gain market share in other auto-related asset-backed securities. 

During the Report Period, DBRS rated 69.8% of the auto-fleet lease transactions, 35.8% of the 

subprime auto loan transactions, 12.4% of the auto lease transactions, and 9.4% of the floorplan loan 

transactions that priced during the Report Period.75 KBRA has also established a market share 

presence in some of these auto-related asset-backed security categories, rating 20.3% of the auto-fleet 

lease transactions and 22.8% of the subprime auto loan transactions during the Report Period.76

Smaller NRSROs have also achieved notable market share in certain types of residential 

mortgage-backed securities not included in Chart 13. For instance, DBRS has gained large market 

shares in the non-performing/re-performing mortgage 77 and risk transfer asset classes.78 During the 

Report Period, DBRS achieved the highest market share of all NRSROs rating securities backed by 

 70 See id. 

71 See id.

72 See id. The Asset-Backed Alert database indicates that 37 student loan transactions totaling $23.9 billion priced 

during the Report Period.

73 The Asset-Backed Alert database lists 65 credit card transactions totaling $43.4 billion and 97 prime auto loan 

transactions totaling $78.4 billion that priced during the Report Period. These are the third and fourth largest asset 

classes shown on the database, behind only collateralized debt obligations and non-U.S. residential loans. 

74 See Asset-Backed Alert database.

75 See id. For the Report Period, the Asset-Backed Alert database lists 23 auto-fleet lease transactions totaling $9.8 

billion, 56 subprime auto loan transactions totaling $27.4 billion, 43 auto lease transactions totaling $32.4 billion, 

and 19 floorplan loan transactions totaling $13.1 billion.

76 See id.

77 Generally, “non-performing” transactions are those where the collateral is comprised of loans that are delinquent 

or in default at the time of the securitization, and “re-performing” transactions are those where the collateral is 

comprised of loans that were previously delinquent or in default but are paying at the time of the securitization. 

See, e.g., Moody’s Approach to Ratings Securitisations Backed by Non-Performing and Re-Performing Loans, 

Moody’s Investors Service, Aug. 2016.

78 The Asset-Backed Alert database indicates that 28 non-performing/re-performing mortgage transactions totaling 

$16.1 billion and 22 risk transfer transactions totaling $23.4 billion priced during the Report Period. Risk transfer 

transactions refer to asset-backed securities issued pursuant to credit risk transfer programs implemented by 

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. See Credit Risk Transfer, available at 

https://www.fhfa.gov/PolicyProgramsResearch/Policy/Pages/Credit-Risk-Transfer.aspx(last visited Sept. 13, 

2018).
 

24

non-performing or re-performing mortgages, rating 86.9% of such transactions,79 and the second 

highest market share of all NRSROs rating risk transfer issuances, rating 62.1% of such transactions.80 

Additionally, Morningstar achieved the second highest market share of all NRSROs rating securities 

backed by subprime mortgages, rating 40.6% of the transactions priced during the Report Period.81 

Smaller NRSROs have continued to pursue growth in other types of asset-backed securities as 

well, including collateralized loan obligations. As shown in Chart 14 in Section IV.B.1.(b) of this 

Report, Morningstar was the only smaller NRSRO to rate multiple U.S. CLO transactions in the first 

half of 2018. Over the course of the Report Period, Morningstar issued credit ratings with respect to 

twenty-one collateralized loan obligations.82 KBRA rated a number of commercial real estate 

collateralized loan obligations during the Report Period.83 It has also been reported that KBRA is 

expanding its coverage to include collateralized loan obligations backed by leveraged loans,84 and 

KBRA has since released a methodology for rating structured credit transactions, including 

collateralized loan obligations backed by corporate loan portfolios.85

Smaller NRSROs continue to pursue opportunities in rating categories other than asset-backed 

securities. For example, during the Report Period, Morningstar published methodology for rating real 

estate investment trusts (REITs) and issued a number of unsolicited credit ratings on REITs.86 KBRA 

also published several new methodologies during the Report Period in rating categories other than 

asset-backed securities.87

Smaller NRSROs have also pursued growth through international expansion. For instance, 

during the Report Period, KBRA announced its expansion into Europe with the opening of an office in 

Dublin, Ireland.88 Kroll Bond Rating Agency Europe Limited (“KBRA Europe”), a credit rating 

affiliate of KBRA, was registered by the European Securities and Markets Authority, which enables it 

to issue credit ratings that can be used for regulatory purposes by certain European institutions.89 

 79 See Asset-Backed Alert database. Morningstar was also active in this asset class, rating 27.8% of such 

transactions. See id. 

80 See id. KBRA and Morningstar were also active in this asset class, rating 19.4% and 15.9%, respectively, of these 

transactions. See id. 

81 See id. The Asset-Backed Alert database indicates that 17 subprime mortgage transactions totaling $5.5 billion 

priced during the Report Period. DBRS and KBRA were also active in this asset class, rating 32.6% and 22.4%, 

respectively, of these transactions. See id. 

82 See https://ratingagency.morningstar.com/mcr/ratings-surveillance/structured-finance (listing rated structured 

finance transactions and providing links to more detailed information). 

83 See https://www.krollbondratings.com/ratings/cmbs(listing rated commercial real estate transactions and 

providing links to more detailed information)

84 See, e.g., Kroll Staffs Up for CLO Push, Asset-Backed Alert, March 23, 2018.

85 See KBRA Releases Global Structured Credit Rating Methodology, Kroll Bond Rating Agency, Aug. 7, 2018.

86 See Morningstar Credit Ratings, LLC Launches Ratings of REITs, Morningstar Credit Ratings, LLC, Sept. 15, 

2017. See also https://ratingagency.morningstar.com/mcr/ratings-surveillance/corporate-financial%20institutions

(listing corporate and financial institution ratings and providing links to more detailed information).

87 See, e.g., KBRA Releases U.S. Not-For-Profit Healthcare Rating Methodology,Kroll Bond Rating Agency, Oct. 

25, 2017; KBRA Releases Global Captive Insurer Rating Methodology, Kroll Bond Rating Agency, Nov. 1, 2017.

88 See KBRA Expands into Europe with Opening of Dublin Office, Kroll Bond Rating Agency, Sept. 26, 2017.

89 See ESMA Registers Kroll Bond Rating Agency Europe Limited as a Credit Rating Agency, European Securities 

and Markets Authority, Nov. 13, 2017.
 

25

KBRA Europe published its first European credit rating during the Report Period.90 KBRA was also 

designated as a designated rating organization for structured finance products in Canada during the 

Report Period,91 and has been recognized as an external credit assessment institution by the Office of 

the Superintendent of Financial Institutions, the regulator of Canadian banks and other financial 

institutions. 92

C. Barriers to Entry

Despite the notable progress made by smaller NRSROs in gaining market share in some 

types of asset-backed securities over the past few years (see Section IV.B. of this Report), 

barriers to entry continue to exist in the credit ratings industry, presenting competitive challenges 

for the smaller NRSROs.93 

One such potential barrier referred to by certain smaller NRSROs is the minimum ratings 

requirements that specify use of the ratings of particular rating agencies in the investment management 

contracts of institutional fund managers and the investment guidelines of fixed income mutual fund 

managers, pension plan sponsors, and endowment fund managers.94 The effect of these requirements 

can be to increase the demand and liquidity for securities bearing the ratings of specified rating 

agencies.95 Historically, many of these guidelines refer to the ratings from the larger NRSROs by 

name (i.e., S&P, Moody’s, and Fitch). Despite reports in recent years that investors are increasingly 

changing their guidelines to allow for investments in securities rated by a wider group of NRSROs,96

investment guidelines continue to be identified as a factor impacting the selection of NRSROs to rate 

certain transactions.97

A related barrier to entry is the inclusion requirements of some fixed income indices. To 

be included in many of these indices, securities must be rated by specific NRSROs. Certain 

 90 See KBRA Issues First European Ratings, Kroll Bond Rating Agency, Apr. 27, 2018.

91 See Canadian Securities Regulators Publish Amendments Relating to Designated Rating Organizations, Canadian 

Securities Administrators, March 29, 2018, available at https://www.securitiesadministrators.ca/aboutcsa.aspx?id=1676.

92 See KBRA Recognized as an External Credit Assessment Institution by OSFI, Kroll Bond Rating Agency, July 

19, 2018.

93 See Shankar Ramakrishnan and Philip Scipio, Big three in credit ratings still dominate business, May 4, 

2016, available at http://www.reuters.com/article/uscorpbonds-ratings-idUSL2N17U1L4.

94 See letter from KBRA to the Commission, dated August 19, 2014, available at

http://www.sec.gov/comments/s7-18-11/s71811-88.pdf. This barrier to entry was also mentioned during 

the SEC’s Credit Ratings Roundtable held on May 14, 2013. At the roundtable, a representative of 

Morningstar mentioned that, according to a study conducted by Morningstar, approximately 42% of openend fixed income funds with investment guidelines that reference ratings specifically refer to S&P, 

Moody’s, or a “major NRSRO.” See Credit Rating Roundtable, May 14, 2013, available at 

http://www.sec.gov/spotlight/credit-ratings-roundtable.shtml. 

95 The effect of including particular NRSROs in investment guidelines was highlighted in an article 

concerning a loan securitization. In the article, an issuer referred to the fact that many institutional buyers 

are limited to purchasing securities rated by one of the larger NRSROs, and that a largerNRSRO’s rating 

expanded the number of entities which could purchase the rated securities. See Tracy Alloway, Peer-toPeer Lender Wins Landmark Rating,Fin.Times, July 10, 2014 at Companies and Markets, p. 18.

96 See, e.g., Big Investors Accept More Rating Agencies, Asset-Backed Alert, May 19, 2017.

97 See supra note 61and accompanying text.
 

26

investment companies try to closely track the performance of the indices by purchasing the 

securities included in them, and can thus increase the demand for securities bearing the ratings of 

specific NRSROs. For instance, during the Report Period, Fitch announced that its ratings had 

been added to the J.P. Morgan High-Yield Bond Indices, noting that investors rely on such 

indices to determine which bonds suit their level of credit risk.98

Market participants and academics have identified various other barriers to entry in the 

credit rating industry, including economic and regulatory barriers.99 Among the regulatory 

barriers to entry for NRSROs are the costs associated with complying with the statutory 

provisions implemented by the Rating Agency Act and the Dodd-Frank Act and the related rules 

adopted by the Commission, including the rules and rule amendments that the Commission 

adopted pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act (the “NRSRO Amendments”).100 Commenters on the 

proposed NRSRO Amendments expressed concerns that certain of the requirements would be 

burdensome for smaller NRSROs to implement and could raise barriers to entry for credit rating 

agencies that seek to register as NRSROs.101 In connection with the NRSRO Amendments, the 

Commission acknowledged that, despite efforts to limit the impact on small entities, the DoddFrank Act contained requirements, including those implemented by the NRSRO Amendments, 

which impose costs on NRSROs and may consequently create barriers to entry and have 

negative impacts on competition.102 As discussed in more detail in a prior Annual Report, the 

NRSRO Amendments as adopted by the Commission include various changes intended to 

address concerns regarding barriers to entry, including standards allowing NRSROs to tailor 

particular requirements to their business models, size, and rating methodologies.103

V. TRANSPARENCY 

Congress described the Rating Agency Act as an act to improve ratings quality “by 

fostering accountability, transparency, and competition in the credit rating agency industry.”104 

Section 932 of the Dodd-Frank Act is entitled “Enhanced regulation, accountability, and 

transparency of NRSROs.” Both Acts contain various provisions designed to increase the 

transparency—through clear disclosure open to public scrutiny—of, among other things, 

NRSROs’ credit rating procedures and methodologies, business practices, and credit ratings 

performance.

The NRSRO Amendments improved and expanded the disclosure requirements 

applicable to NRSROs. Additional sources of information that can be beneficial to investors and 

 98 See Fitch Ratings Joins J.P. Morgan High Yield Bond Indices, Fitch Ratings, June 28, 2017.

99 See, e.g., Section IV.C. of the March 2012 Annual Report, available at 

https://www.sec.gov/divisions/marketreg/ratingagency/nrsroannrep0312.pdf.

100 See Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations, Release No. 34-72936 (Aug. 27, 2014), 79 FR 55077 

(Sept. 15, 2014) (“Adopting Release”).

101 See Adopting Release, 79 FR at 55090, 55154, 55161, and 55254-55. See also comment letters received with 

respect to the NRSRO Amendments as proposed, available at http://www.sec.gov/comments/s7-18-

11/s71811.shtml.

102 See Adopting Release, 79 FR at 55254.

103 See Section IV.C. of the December 2015 Annual Report, available at 

https://www.sec.gov/ocr/reportspubs/annual-reports/2015-annual-report-on-nrsros.pdf.

104 See the preamble to the Rating Agency Act. 
 

27

others are required to be made publicly available under the NRSRO Amendments. These 

requirements are designed to enhance the transparency of NRSRO credit ratings by reducing 

information asymmetries that may adversely affect users of credit ratings.

105 Specifically, under 

the NRSRO Amendments, NRSROs must disclose:

(1) standardized performance statistics;106

(2) consolidated and increased information about credit rating histories;107

(3) information about material changes and significant errors in the procedures and 

methodologies used to determine credit ratings;108

(4) information about specific rating actions;109 and 

(5) clear definitions of each symbol, number, or score in the rating scale used by the 

NRSRO.110

An objective of these requirements is to improve the information provided to users of 

credit ratings in order to facilitate external scrutiny of NRSRO activities, enable ratings users to 

make more informed investment and credit-related decisions and allow users to compare the 

performance of credit ratings by different NRSROs.111

In accordance with the NRSRO Amendments, each NRSRO must disclose certain 

information in connection with each rating action it takes.112 Such information includes, among 

other things, the version of the procedure or methodology used to determine the credit rating, a 

description of the types of data that were relied upon for purposes of determining the credit 

rating, an assessment of the quality of information available and considered in determining the 

credit rating, and information on the sensitivity of the credit ratings to assumptions made by the 

NRSRO.

113 These requirements are designed to promote transparency of the process for 

determining credit rating actions, allowing users of credit ratings to better understand how credit 

ratings are produced and the information content of credit ratings, including how these factors 

vary across NRSROs.

114

In addition to the disclosures required by rule, NRSROs often issue press releases and 

reports at the time of a rating action to describe the rationale behind such rating action,115 and 

make versions of the methodologies for determining credit ratings available on their websites. 

The availability of the underlying methodologies, together with a report discussing the analysis 

supporting a rating action, provides additional transparency into the credit rating process. 

 105 See Adopting Release, 79 FR at 55091.

106 See Instructions for Exhibit 1 to Form NRSRO; Adopting Release, 79 FR at 55295-302.

107 See Rule 17g-7(b); Adopting Release, 79 FR at 55266-67. 

108 See Rule 17g-8(a)(4); Adopting Release, 79 FR at 55267-68.

109 See Rule 17g-7(a); Adopting Release, 79 FR at 55264-66. 

110 See Rule 17g-8(b)(2); Adopting Release, 79 FR at 55268.

111 See Adopting Release, 79 FR at 55091.

112 See Rule 17g-7(a).

113 See Rule 17g-7(a)(1)(ii).

114 See Adopting Release, 79 FR at 55180.

115 The reports accompanying a rating action are frequently available on a paid subscription basis, although some 

NRSROs provide access to suchreports for free.
 

28

Beyond the disclosures required under Section 15E and the related Commission rules, 

and information otherwise made available by NRSROs with respect to their credit ratings, 

transparency may be increased to the extent NRSROs publish commentaries or research that 

highlight differences of opinion they may have with other NRSROs. There are a number of 

examples of such publications from the Report Period. For instance, KBRA published several 

reports during the Report Period that discussed differences in its approach to rating financial 

institutions from those of other NRSROs.116 Another example is a commentary published by 

Fitch regarding a specific asset-backed securities offering. In this commentary, Fitch noted 

several concerns regarding the transaction and concluded that the transaction would not meet its 

investment grade standards.117

Commentaries and research pieces such as those mentioned above may provide additional 

insight into the credit characteristics of certain securities or asset types and/or highlight differences in

opinions and ratings criteria among NRSROs. This type of information can serve to enhance 

investors’ understanding of the differences in ratings approaches used by the NRSROs.

Technological advances may also impact transparency and other aspects of the credit rating 

industry. For instance, DBRS published a commentary discussing the use of virtual reality technology 

in the commercial real estate industry, such as by providing real estate purchasers and investors with 

online access to images of commercial properties. DBRS noted that the use of this technology “could 

provide improved analytics and transparency for investors in the commercial mortgage-backed 

security market.” 118 Other technological advances such as artificial intelligence have the potential to 

impact the credit rating industry as well,119 and some NRSROs have launched initiatives related to 

technological developments. For example, Moody’s formed an Analytic and Technology Solutions 

group in 2017 to, among other things, “expand [its] technological innovation activities, including 

advanced capabilities in machine learning and artificial intelligence.” 120 The parent companies of 

certain NRSROs have also made investments in artificial intelligence and other technology 

companies.121

 116 See, e.g., Credit Card Banks: A Fresh Perspective on Risk, Kroll Bond Rating Agency, Sept. 18, 2017; Why 

Haven’t Ratings Changed Much on Large U.S. Regionals Since the Credit Crisis?, Kroll Bond Rating Agency, 

Sept. 28, 2017; Bank Preferred Notching: A Sensible Approach, Kroll Bond Rating Agency, Jan. 3, 2018.

117 See Fitch: BJETS 2017-1 Aircraft ABS Not Investment Grade, Fitch Ratings, Oct. 10, 2017.

118 See The VR Revolution in the Commercial Real Estate Industry, DBRS, May 2, 2017.

119 Though not specifically discussing the use of artificial intelligence in the credit rating industry, in a research 

report published during the Report Period, Moody’s identified some potential benefits of artificial intelligence as 

“boosting productivity, automating routine tasks and reducing error rates” but noted that “the most transformative 

uses are still in early development.” See Announcement: Moody’s: Transformative potential of artificial 

intelligence still years away, despite rapid recent growth, Moody’s Investors Service, Feb. 8, 2018.

120 See Moody’s Announces Investment in QuantCube, AI-Based Predictive Analytics Firm, Moody’s Corporation, 

May 29, 2018.

121 See, e.g., id. (announcing Moody’s Corporation had made a strategic minority investment in a provider of realtime, artificial intelligence-based predictive analytics); Antoine Gara, Wall Street Tech Spree: With Kensho 

Acquisition S&P Global Makes Largest A.I. Deal In History, Forbes.com, Mar. 6, 2018, available at 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/antoinegara/2018/03/06/wall-street-tech-spree-with-kensho-acquisition-sp-globalmakes-largest-a-i-deal-in-history/#a00466867b85(discussing S&P Global’s agreement to buy an artificial 

intelligence and analytics firm and quoting the CEO of S&P Global, Douglas Peterson, as saying in a statement 

that “Via this acquisition, S&P Global is demonstrating a strong commitment to not just participating in the 

fintech evolution, but leading it.”).
 

29

VI. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

NRSROs operate under a combination of two business models, and there are potential 

conflicts of interest inherent in both. Most of the NRSROs, including the larger NRSROs, 

primarily operate under the “issuer-pay” model, which is subject to a potential conflict in that the 

credit rating agency may be influenced to determine more favorable (i.e., higher) ratings than 

warranted in order to retain the obligors or issuers as clients. This conflict could affect an entire 

asset class if, for example, an NRSRO becomes known for issuing higher credit ratings with 

respect to such class, resulting in that NRSRO’s retaining or attracting business from most or all 

issuers of securities in such class.122 The potential for such a conflict to influence the ratings 

process may be particularly acute with respect to structured finance products, where transactions 

are arranged by a relatively concentrated group of sponsors, underwriters, and managers, and 

rating fees are particularly lucrative.123 

The other business model is the “subscriber-pay” model which means that investors pay 

the rating agency a subscription fee to access its ratings. This model is also subject to potential 

conflicts of interest. For example, an NRSRO may be aware that an influential subscriber holds 

a securities position (long or short) that could be advantaged if a credit rating upgrade or 

downgrade causes the market value of the security to increase or decrease or that a subscriber 

invests in newly issued bonds and would obtain higher yields if the bonds were to have lower 

ratings. 

Another example of a conflict in a “subscriber-pay” model is that the NRSRO may be 

aware that a subscriber wishes to acquire a particular security but is prevented from doing so 

because the credit rating of the security is lower than internal investment guidelines or an 

applicable contract permit. An upgrade of the credit rating of the security by the NRSRO could 

remove this impediment to investing in the security. These potential conflicts could be mitigated 

to the extent that an NRSRO has a wide subscriber base and subscribers have different interests 

with respect to an upgrade or downgrade of a particular security.

Section 15E and the related Commission rules contain provisions addressing conflicts of 

interest. For example, Rule 17g-5 identifies certain conflicts of interest that are prohibited 

under all circumstances124 and other conflicts of interest that are prohibited unless an NRSRO 

has publicly disclosed the existence of the conflict and has implemented policies and procedures 

reasonably designed to address and manage such conflict.125 One such prohibited conflict of 

interest is Rule 17g-5(c)(8), which was added by the NRSRO Amendments. In accordance with 

this rule, an NRSRO is prohibited from issuing or maintaining a credit rating where a person 

 122 Some authors, however, have written about the effect of reputational concerns on the motivation of rating 

agencies to provide accurate ratings. See, e.g., Steven L. Schwarcz, Private Ordering of Public Markets: The 

Rating Agency Paradox, 2002 U.ILL. L. REV. 1 (2002); Harold Cole and Thomas F. Cooley, Rating Agencies, 

NBER working paper No. 19972 (Mar. 2014).

123 A Senate Report related to the Dodd-Frank Act noted, for instance, that conflicts of interest in the process 

of rating structuredfinancial products contributed to the issuance of inaccurate ratings by rating agencies 

and, accordingly,to the mismanagement of risks by financial institutions and investors. See S. Report No. 

111-176 (2010).

124 See Rule 17g-5(c).

125 See Rule 17g-5(a)(1)-(2); Rule 17g-5(b); and Form NRSRO, Exhibits 6-7. Additional requirements apply 

to the “issuer-pay” conflict of interest in the context of credit ratings of asset-backed securities. See Rule 

17g-5(a)(3). 
 

30

within the NRSRO who participates in determining or monitoring the rating, or developing or 

approving procedures or methodologies used for determining the rating, also (a) participates in 

sales or marketing activities of the NRSRO or its affiliate or (b) is influenced by sales or 

marketing considerations.126

The annual examinations conducted by Staff in accordance with Section 15E(p) are 

required to include, among other things, a review of the management of conflicts of interest by 

the NRSRO and the policies of the NRSRO governing post-employment activities of its former 

personnel.127 Information regarding the examinations, including any essential findings with 

respect to these review areas, is included in OCR’s annual examination reports. 128 

VII. CONCLUSION

The Staff will continue to conduct its oversight function with respect to NRSROs, including 

the performance of Staff examinations, and engage in other activities in furtherance of OCR’s 

regulatory mission, as described in this Report. 

 126 See Rule 17g-5(c)(8).

127 See Section 15E(p)(3)(B).

128 The examination reports can be found under “Summary Examination Reports” in the “Reports and Studies” 

section of the OCR webpage, available at http://www.sec.gov/ocr.