alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Mark Faello, Appellant, v Federal Express, Respondent. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

[823 NYS2d 615]

*943Crew III, J.P.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed June 3, 2005, which ruled that claimant’s application for review was not timely filed.

Claimant alleged that he sustained a work-related injury after he purportedly was assaulted by a security officer at his place of employment. Following a hearing on the disputed issues of accident, notice and causal relationship, a Workers’ Compensation Law Judge found that the physical contact to which claimant attributed his injuries was not an assault and, hence, did not result in a compensable injury. Accordingly, claimant’s application was disallowed. Claimant thereafter filed an application for review by the Workers’ Compensation Board, which claimant served upon the self-insured employer’s claims manager but not the employer itself. Finding that the employer was not served with the application for Board review, a Board panel denied claimant’s application and closed the claim. This appeal by claimant ensued.

We affirm. Claimant does not dispute that he failed to serve the self-insured employer, arguing instead that service upon the employer’s representative was sufficient. The relevant regulation makes clear, however, that the application for Board review must be served upon all parties in interest to the proceeding *(see*12 NYCRR 300.13 [a]). As the self-insured employer plainly has a manifest interest in the underlying proceeding, the Board is bound by the service requirements of 12 NYCRR 300.13 (a) *(see Matter of Vukel v New York Water & Sewer Mains,*94 NY2d 494, 497 [2000]). Accordingly, the Board panel’s denial of claimant’s application for review was entirely proper.

Carpinello, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
November 16, 2015

Dear Mr. Cox:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA-2015-3302). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Describe the aircraft make(s), model(s), a nd type(s)(i.e. - fixed-wing, rotorcraft, lighterthan-air) for the proposed UAS operation. The description(s) should include the maximum weight (including payload). This information can be located in the aircraft manual(s).

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov. Once your information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary information), as well as your comment tracking number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 11/30/15. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/S/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst
### §§204a, 204b. Repealed. June 25, 1948, ch. 646, §39, 62 Stat. 992, eff. Sept. 1, 1948

Section 204a, act Apr. 26, 1928, ch. 438, §2, 45 Stat. 463, related to inclusion of park in a judicial district. See section 84 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

Section 204b, act Apr. 26, 1928, ch. 438, §3, 45 Stat. 463, related to application of California laws to offenses. See section 13 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 51 (Wednesday, March 16, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 14436]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6069]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Committee for Cyberinfrastructure; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Advisory Committee for Cyberinfrastructure (25150).
    Date and Time: April 1, 2011, 2 p.m.-4 p.m.
    Place: Teleconference, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Blvd., Room 1160, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Kristen Oberright, Office of the Director, 
Office of Cyberinfrastructure (OD/OCI), National Science Foundation, 
4201 Wilson Blvd., Suite 1145, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone: 703-
292-8970.
    Minutes: May be obtained from the contact person listed above.
    Purpose of Meeting: To advise NSF on the impact of its policies, 
programs and activities on the CI community. To provide advice to 
the Director/NSF on issues related to long-range planning, and to 
form ad hoc subcommittees to carry out needed studies and tasks.
    Agenda: Discussion to approve taskforce reports.

    Dated: March 10, 2011.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-6069 Filed 3-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.2

ORTHOVITA, INC.

CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER

REQUIRED BY RULE 13A-14(B) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

AND 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350

I, Nancy C. Broadbent, Chief Financial Officer of Orthovita, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation (the Company), hereby certify that:

(1) The Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/    NANCY C. BROADBENTSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)


Date: March 16, 2010
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  SBA Leadership 
-  Mark Ranneberger 

#   Mark Ranneberger

Senior Advisor

            Download high-resolution image          

Mark Ranneberger serves as the Senior Advisor to the Deputy Administrator.  

He comes to SBA from the State Department, where he served as Senior Advisor to the Special Representative for Commercial and Business Affairs. At the State Department, Ranneberger worked to advance commercial diplomacy and level the playing field for the U.S. private sector, including small businesses, around the world. 

Prior to joining the Biden-Harris Administration, Ranneberger worked with the communications and policy teams at Meta to counter COVID-19 misinformation and improve advertising policy transparency. He also served as National Press Secretary to now Senator John Hickenlooper and was an advisor to the Biden campaign’s Foreign Policy Working Group. Earlier in his career, Ranneberger worked in the private sector, holding positions at Deloitte, Uber, Edelman, and FWD.us. 

Mr. Ranneberger graduated from American University in Washington, DC, with a Bachelor’s Degree in International Studies.
Pictured is a Asian princess washing her hands with the text “Everyone loves to have 

clean hands!”
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 11-2114

___________ Streambend Properties II, LLC; * Streambend Properties VIII, LLC, * * Appellants, * * v. * * Ivy Tower Minneapolis, LLC; Jeffrey * Appeal from the United States Laux; Gary Benson, * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Appellees, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Burnet Realty, LLC, * * Defendant, * * Commonwealth Land Title Insurance * Company; John Doe; Mary Rowe; * XYZ Corp., * * Defendants. *

___________ Submitted: December 23, 2011 Filed: January 11, 2012

___________ Before LOKEN, BYE, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.Streambend Properties II, LLC and Stream bend Properties VIII, LLC appeal the district court’s order dismissing their civil ac tion for failure to state a claim. The court concluded that plaintiffs failed to suffici ently plead the inters tate-commerce element of the claims brought under the Interstate Land Sales Full Disclo sure Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1701 et seq. After careful de novo review, seeOwen v. Gen. Motors Corp. , 533 F.3d 913, 918 (8th Cir. 2008), we find thatparagraphs 46 and 47 of the complaint sufficiently pleaded this element. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8( a); Ashcroft v. Iqbal , 129 S. Ct. 1937, 1949-50 (2009); Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly , 550 U.S. 544, 555-57 (2007). The complaint alleges that the defendants “m ade use . . . of the mails” and made false representations “by . . . letters.” Given th at Rule 8(a)(2) requires only “a short and plain statement of the claim,” and that “[ s]pecific facts are not necessary,” Erickson v. Pardus , 551 U.S. 89, 93 (2007) (per curiam), these statements were sufficient to allege “use . . . of the mails” as requi red by 15 U.S.C. § 1703(a) . Accordingly, we reverse the dismissal of the Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act claims in Counts 1 and 2 of the complaint, a nd we remand to the district court for further proceedings.

______________________________

- 2-
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### United States Mint

# ACTION:

                        Pricing for 2010 United States Mint America the Beautiful Quarters Silver Proof SetTM; 2010 United States Mint Silver Proof SetTM; 2011 United States Mint America the Beautiful Quarters Silver Proof SetTM.                    

# SUMMARY:

The United States Mint is announcing an increase in the price of the 2010 United States Mint America the Beautiful Quarters Silver Proof Set, the 2010 United States Mint Silver Proof Set and the 2011 United States Mint America the Beautiful Quarters Silver Proof Set.

                        In accordance with 31 U.S.C. 9701(b)(2)(B), the United States Mint is setting the price of these products to reflect recent increases in the market price of silver.                              ( print page 15048)    

The 2010 United States Mint America the Beautiful Quarters Silver Proof Set will be priced at $39.95.

The 2010 United States Mint Silver Proof Set will be priced at $64.95.

The 2011 United States Mint America the Beautiful Quarters Silver Proof Set will be priced at $41.95.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

B. B. Craig, Associate Director for Sales and Marketing; United States Mint; 801 9th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20220, or call 202-354-7500.

Authority:31 U.S.C. 5111, 5112, 5132 & 9701.

Dated: March 14, 2011.

Richard A. Peterson,

Acting Director, United States Mint.

[FR Doc. 2011-6344 Filed 3-17-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
#### § 4.13 Time for filing protest.

Thirty days after service thereof will be allowed to the licensee within which to file a protest to such report.
§ 93.905 Declaration and other documents for live fish, fertilized eggs, and gametes. ( a ) For all live fish, fertilized eggs, and gametes offered for importation under this subpart, the importer or his or her agent must submit the following documents to the collector of customs for use by the port veterinarian: ( 1 ) All permits, certificates, or other documentation required by this subpart; and
( 2 ) Two copies of a declaration that lists the port of entry, the name and address of the importer, the name and address of the broker, the origin of the live fish, fertilized eggs, or gametes, the number, species, and the purpose of the importation, the name of the person to whom the fish will be delivered, and the location of the place to which such delivery will be made.
( b ) Any declaration, permit, or other document for live fish, fertilized eggs, and gametes required under this subpart may be issued and presented using a U.S. Government electronic information exchange system or other authorized method.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0301) [71 FR 51435, Aug. 30, 2006, as amended at 81 FR 40152, June 21, 2016]
### **CHAPTER 57B—PARTNERS FOR FISH AND WILDLIFE**

Sec.
3771.
Findings and purpose.
3772.
Definitions.
3773.
Partners for Fish and Wildlife Program.
3774.
Authorization of appropriations.
uhsi_Ex1025


		
			AMENDMENT ONE TO OPTION AGREEMENT
		

		
			This is Amendment One to the Option Agreement between UHS Holdco, Inc. (the “Company”) and Thomas Leonard (“Grantee”) originally effective May 8, 2015 (the “Agreement”).
		

		
			This Amendment One is effective March 14, 2016.
		

		
			Capitalized terms used in this Amendment have the same meaning ascribed to them in the Agreement, unless otherwise indicated.
		

			
	
			
				 1.
			

			
	
			
			Purpose.  Grantee has agreed to reduce the number of shares Grantee has the Option to purchase under the Agreement from 15,000,000 shares to 14,000,000 shares.




			
	
			
				 2.
			

			
	
			
			Grant of Options.  Section 1 of the Agreement is hereby amended to update the Option from 15,000,000 shares to 14,000,000 shares, provided, however, that the reduction of 1,000,000 shares will come from group of Options set to vest on the fifth anniversary of the Grant Date.




		
			All other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain unchanged.  To the extent that there is any conflict between this Amendment and the Agreement, this Amendment will control

		

		
			ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:

		

			
					
						

					
						 

					
						 

					
						

					
						

					
						 

					
					
						 

					
						 

					
						 

					
						 

					
						 

					
						 

				
	
					
						UHS HOLDCO, INC.

					
						/s/ James Pekarek

					
						James Pekarek

					
						CFO

					
						March 14, 2016

					
					
						GRANTEE

					
						 /s/ Thomas Leonard 

					
						Thomas Leonard

					
						CEO 

					
						March 14, 2016
### §§143, 144. Repealed. Dec. 16, 1930, ch. 14, §1, 46 Stat. 1028

Sections, act Jan. 9, 1903, ch. 63, §§3, 4, 32 Stat. 765, related to leases of cavern and lands, and provided for disposition of funds from rentals or leases.
# C_2013026EN.01004403.xml

| 26.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/44

---

Order of the General Court of 27 November 2012 — Steinberg v Commission

(Case T-17/10) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to funding decisions for grants to Israeli and Palestinian non-governmental organisations under the ‘Partnership for Peace’ programme and the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights - Partial refusal of access - Exception relating to the protection of the public interest as regards public security - Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

2013/C 26/86

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Gerald Steinberg (Jerusalem, Israel) (represented by: T. Asserson, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Tufvesson and C. ten Dam, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision SG.E.3/MV/psi D(2009) 3914 of 15 May 2009, partially refusing the applicant access to certain documents relating to funding decisions for grants to Israeli and Palestinian non-governmental organisations under the ‘Partnership for Peace’ programme and the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR)

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly lacking any foundation in law; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly lacking any foundation in law;

| 2. | Mr Gerald Steinberg shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Gerald Steinberg shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 80, 27.3.2010.

1

---
§ 115.87 Data collection. ( a ) The agency shall collect accurate, uniform data for every allegation of sexual abuse at facilities under its direct control using a standardized instrument and set of definitions.
( b ) The agency shall aggregate the incident-based sexual abuse data at least annually.
( c ) The incident-based data collected shall include, at a minimum, the data necessary to answer all questions from the most recent version of the Survey of Sexual Violence conducted by the Department of Justice.
( d ) The agency shall maintain, review, and collect data as needed from all available incident-based documents, including reports, investigation files, and sexual abuse incident reviews.
( e ) The agency also shall obtain incident-based and aggregated data from every private facility with which it contracts for the confinement of its inmates.
( f ) Upon request, the agency shall provide all such data from the previous calendar year to the Department of Justice no later than June 30.
HELP YOUR KIDS STAY SAFE, 

BEYOND THE KITCHEN.

Teach them to make safe choices every day.

Marijuana can be harmful for a child’s growing brain. It’s important to talk with 

your children from a young age about what marijuana is and how it can be harmful 

to their developing brain. For tips on how—and when—to begin the conversation, 

visit: 

www.underagedrinking.samhsa.gov

SMA-18-5088FLY
#### In the Matter of James Warren, Petitioner, v Glenn S. Goord, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.

[824 NYS2d 496]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with possessing contraband and altered items after three makeshift weapons that were made from state pens and sharpened pieces of flat metal were found in his cell. He was found guilty of the charges following a tier III disciplinary hearing. The determination was affirmed on administrative appeal, resulting in this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with the items *1145retrieved from petitioner’s cell, constitute substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt *(see e.g. Matter of Ramirez v Goord,*32 AD3d 601, 601 [2006]; *Matter of Morales v Goord,*290 AD2d 790, 791 [2002]). Petitioner’s remaining contentions, including his claim that he was improperly denied the opportunity to call witnesses, have not been preserved for our review due to his failure to raise them at the hearing *(see Matter of Burgess v Goord,*30 AD3d 877, 878 [2006]).

Mercure, J.P, Peters, Carpinello, Mugglin and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
§ 367.82 Rents. ( a ) The rent expense accounts provided under the several functional groups of expense accounts must include all rents, including taxes paid by the lessee on leased property, for property used in the operations of the service company, except: ( 1 ) Minor amounts paid for occasional or infrequent use of any property or equipment and all amounts paid for use of equipment that, if owned, would be includible in property accounts 391 to 398 (§§ 367.3910 to 367.3980), inclusive, that must be treated as an expense item and included in the appropriate functional account, and
( 2 ) Rents that are chargeable to clearing accounts, and distributed from the clearing accounts to the appropriate account. If rents cover property used for more than one function, such as production and transmission, or by more than one department, the rents must be apportioned to the appropriate rent expense or clearing accounts of each department on an actual, or, if necessary, an estimated basis.
( b ) When a portion of property or equipment rented from others for use in connection with service company operations is subleased, the revenue derived from the subleasing must be credited to the rent revenue account in operating revenues. However, if the rent was charged to a clearing account, amounts received from subleasing the property must be credited to the clearing account.
( c ) The cost, when incurred by the lessee, of operating and maintaining leased property, must be charged to the accounts appropriate for the expense if the property were owned.
( d ) The cost incurred by the lessee of additions and replacements to property leased from others must be accounted for as provided in Service Company Property Instruction in § 367.54.
§ 115.351 Resident reporting. ( a ) The agency shall provide multiple internal ways for residents to privately report sexual abuse and sexual harassment, retaliation by other residents or staff for reporting sexual abuse and sexual harassment, and staff neglect or violation of responsibilities that may have contributed to such incidents.
( b ) The agency shall also provide at least one way for residents to report abuse or harassment to a public or private entity or office that is not part of the agency and that is able to receive and immediately forward resident reports of sexual abuse and sexual harassment to agency officials, allowing the resident to remain anonymous upon request. Residents detained solely for civil immigration purposes shall be provided information on how to contact relevant consular officials and relevant officials at the Department of Homeland Security.
( c ) Staff shall accept reports made verbally, in writing, anonymously, and from third parties and shall promptly document any verbal reports.
( d ) The facility shall provide residents with access to tools necessary to make a written report.
( e ) The agency shall provide a method for staff to privately report sexual abuse and sexual harassment of residents.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 837 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to decrease the distance 

away from home required for a member of a reserve component of 

the Armed Forces to be eligible for the above-the-line deduction for 

travel expenses. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 14, 2019 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself and Mr. TILLIS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to decrease 

the distance away from home required for a member 

of a reserve component of the Armed Forces to be eligible for the above-the-line deduction for travel expenses. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Savings for Service5 members Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 837 IS

1 SEC. 2. DECREASE IN REQUIRED DISTANCE AWAY FROM 

2 HOME FOR ABOVE-THE-LINE DEDUCTION 

3 FOR TRAVEL EXPENSES OF MEMBERS OF A 

4 RESERVE COMPONENT OF THE ARMED 

5 FORCES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 62(a)(2)(E) of the Inter7 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘100 

8 miles’’ and inserting ‘‘50 miles’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

11 December 31, 2018. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS