alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AMENDMENT NUMBER 7
                                     TO THE
                            CANANDAIGUA BRANDS, INC.
                        1989 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN


This  Amendment  Number 7 to the  Canandaigua  Brands,  Inc. 1989 Employee Stock
Purchase  Plan (the  "Plan") is adopted  pursuant to Paragraph 20 of the Plan by
the Board of Directors of Constellation  Brands, Inc. (f/k/a Canandaigua Brands,
Inc.) (the  "Company").  Capitalized  terms used herein which are not  otherwise
defined shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Plan.

     1.   NAME. The name of the Plan is hereby changed to Constellation  Brands,
          Inc. 1989 Employee  Stock  Purchase  Plan," and all  references in the
          Plan to "Canandaigua  Brands,  Inc." are hereby replaced by references
          to "Constellation Brands, Inc."

     2. Effective November 1, Paragraph 22(a) is amended to read as follows:

               All costs and expenses incurred in the administration of the Plan
               shall be paid by the Company or the  employee,  as the Company so
               determines.

     3.   Effective  November 1, the fourth paragraph of Paragraph 23 is amended
          to read as follows:

               All  transactional  costs and account  maintenance  fees, if any,
               shall be paid by the employee or as otherwise  determined  by the
               Company.

In witness whereof,  Constellation Brands, Inc. has caused this instrument to be
executed as of December 21, 2000.

                                                  CONSTELLATION BRANDS, INC.


                                                  By: /s/ Richard Sands
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Richard Sands, President
### §157a. Additional lands; aggregate cost

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to acquire, in such manner as he shall consider to be in the public interest, any land or interests in land situated within sections 15, 22, 27, 34, block 234, Brewster County, Texas, which he shall consider to be suitable for addition to the Big Bend National Park: Provided, however, That the aggregate cost to the Federal Government of properties acquired hereafter and under the provisions hereof shall not exceed the sum of $10,000. Properties acquired pursuant to this section shall become a part of the park upon acquisition of title thereto by the United States.

(Aug. 30, 1949, ch. 522, 63 Stat. 679.)
§ 115.116 Detainees with disabilities and detainees who are limited English proficient. ( a ) The agency shall take appropriate steps to ensure that detainees with disabilities (including, for example, detainees who are deaf or hard of hearing, those who are blind or have low vision, or those who have intellectual, psychiatric, or speech disabilities), have an equal opportunity to participate in or benefit from all aspects of the agency's efforts to prevent, detect, and respond to sexual abuse and sexual harassment. Such steps shall include, when necessary to ensure effective communication with detainees who are deaf or hard of hearing, providing access to interpreters who can interpret effectively, accurately, and impartially, both receptively and expressively, using any necessary specialized vocabulary. In addition, the agency shall ensure that written materials are provided in formats or through methods that ensure effective communication with detainees with disabilities, including detainees who have intellectual disabilities, limited reading skills, or who are blind or have low vision. An agency is not required to take actions that it can demonstrate would result in a fundamental alteration in the nature of a service, program, or activity, or in undue financial and administrative burdens, as those terms are used in regulations promulgated under title II of the Americans With Disabilities Act, 28 CFR 35.164.
( b ) The agency shall take reasonable steps to ensure meaningful access to all aspects of the agency's efforts to prevent, detect, and respond to sexual abuse and sexual harassment to detainees who are limited English proficient, including steps to provide interpreters who can interpret effectively, accurately, and impartially, both receptively and expressively, using any necessary specialized vocabulary.
( c ) The agency shall not rely on detainee interpreters, detainee readers, or other types of detainee assistants except in limited circumstances where an extended delay in obtaining an effective interpreter could compromise the detainee's safety, the performance of first-response duties under § 115.164, or the investigation of the detainee's allegations.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  For Partners 
-  Counselors 
-  Instructional Materials For Trainers 
-  Business Smart Toolkit 

## Section navigation

-  Lenders 
-  Counselors    -  Small Business Development Centers 
  -  Veterans Business Outreach Centers 
  -  Women's Business Centers 
  -  Community Navigator Pilot Program 
  -  Instructional materials for trainers      -  SBA Spanish glossary 
    -  Money Smart for Small Business 
    -  Business Smart Toolkit 
  -  Nexus 
-  SBICs 
-  Surety bond partners and agents 
-  Contracting officials 

# Business Smart Toolkit

The SBA Business Smart Toolkit is a ready-to-use workshop toolkit that lays the groundwork for helping new and aspiring entrepreneurs launch a business idea and to understand the steps to building a business that is credit-ready. It is designed for local community organizations whose constituents are interested in starting a business but do not know where to begin.

The information is laid out simply in three modules.

The three modules focus on:
                  - Basics of business startup
                  - Essentials of becoming credit-ready
                  - How and where to find additional small business support and educational resources

Each module has approximately 60‐90 minutes of presentation material. The modules can be presented in a one-day [or multiple day] workshop(s), depending on what is best suited for the individual community. The toolkit and accompanying instructor guide are written at a level so that a community volunteer can feel comfortable presenting the information.
                  - Business Smart Modules ( English  |  Spanish )
                  - Business Smart Flyer ( English  |  Spanish )

 

If you would like more information or have questions, email BusinessSmart@sba.gov. Please allow two business days for a response.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0107

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

SHANE THOMPSON FREIBURG, 

Defendant and Appellant, 

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s unopposed motion for extension 

of time, and good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including June 26, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 22 2023

05/22/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0107
### SUBCHAPTER XXII—LASSEN VOLCANIC NATIONAL PARK
# C_2019025EN.01003401.xml

| 21.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 25/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/34

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 November 2018 — Banco Santander v Commission

(Case T-227/10) (1)

((State aid - Provisions concerning corporate tax allowing undertakings which are tax resident in Spain to amortise the goodwill resulting from the acquisition of shareholdings in undertakings which are tax resident abroad - Decision declaring the aid to be incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery - Concept of State aid - Selectivity - Reference system - Derogation - Difference in treatment - Justification of the difference in treatment - Undertakings benefiting from the measure - Legitimate expectations))

(2019/C 25/42)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Banco Santander, SA (Santander, Spain) (represented by: initially, J. Buendía Sierra, E. Abad Valdenebro, M. Muñoz de Juan and R. Calvo Salinero, and, subsequently, J. Buendía Sierra, E. Abad Valdenebro, R. Calvo Salinero and A. Lamadrid de Pablo, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal and C. Urraca Caviedes, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of Article 1(1) of Commission Decision 2011/5/EC of 28 October 2009 on the tax amortisation of financial goodwill for foreign shareholding acquisitions C 45/07 (ex NN 51/07, ex CP 9/07) implemented by Spain (OJ 2011 L 7, p. 48) and, in the alternative, annulment of Article 4 of that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Banco Santander, SA to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Banco Santander, SA to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 195, 17.7.2010.

---
Commissioner Commissioner Chair Commissioner Commissioner

Office of the Chair

Divisions

Corporation

Finance

Economic and

Risk Analysis Enforcement Examinations InvestmentManagement

Trading and

Markets

Inspector

General

Offices

Advocate for

Small Business

Capital

Formation

Chief

Accountant

Chief Operating

Officer

Credit

Ratings

Equal

Employment

Opportunity

Ethics

Counsel

General

Counsel

International

Affairs

Investor

Education and

Advocacy

Legislative and

Intergovernmental

Affairs

Minority and

Women

Inclusion

Municipal

Securities

Public

Affairs Secretary

Acquisitions EDGAR

Business Office

Financial

Management

Human

Resources

Information

Technology

Support

Operations

Regional Offices

Atlanta

Regional Office

Boston

Regional Office

Chicago

Regional Office

Denver

Regional Office

Fort Worth

Regional Office

Los Angeles

Regional Office

Miami

Regional Office

New York

Regional Office

Philadelphia

Regional Office

Salt Lake

Regional Office

San Francisco

Regional Office

Administrative

Law Judges

Investor

Advocate

Strategic Hub

for Innovation

and Financial 

Technology

Report directly to the Commission Independent office Report directly to the Chair
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Quotemedia, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Keith J. Randall,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to my best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                                                      
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ Keith J. Randall                                 
|    |  | Keith J. Randall Chief
Financial Officer May 13, 2011
EXHIBIT
      23.1




**MOORE
      & ASSOCIATES, CHARTERED**




**ACCOUNTANTS
      AND ADVISORS**


***PCAOB
      REGISTERED***











**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**







We
      consent to the use, in the statement on Form 10KSB of Whitemark Homes Inc,
      of
      our report dated March 21, 2008 on our audit of the financial statements of
      Whitemark Homes Inc as of December 31, 2007, and the related statements of
      operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the year ended December 31,
      2007, and from inception of development stage on October 1, 2007 through
      December 31, 2007, and the reference to us under the caption
“Experts.”










/s/ ***Moore
&
Associates,
              Chartered***Moore
                & Associates Chartered
              Las
                Vegas, Nevada
              April
                14, 2008











CONSENT
      OF MOORE & ASSOCIATES, Chartered


--------------------------------------------------------
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

BRIAN CECILIO RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 17

- 50361

D.C. No. 2:17

- cr

- 00219

- PA

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California Percy Anderson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 1 2 , 2018 **

Before: LEAVY, HAWKINS, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

Brian Cecilio Rodriguez appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 30

- month sentence imposed following his guilty

- plea conviction for

conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, and aggravated identity theft, in

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028A(a)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously conclud es this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

SEP 18 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 17

- 50361

§ 1291, and we affirm.

Rodriguez contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to

explain the sentence, specifically the disparity between Rodriguez’s 30

- month

sentence and his co

- defendant’s 25

- month sentence. The district court adequately

explained the reasons for Rodriguez’s low

- end sentence

. See United States v.

Carty , 520 F.3d 984, 992 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc). The district court was not

required to “tick off each of the [18 U.S.C.] § 3553(a) factors to show that it ha[d]

considered them

. ” Id. Nor did Rodriguez raise arguments that would have

warranted a more fulsome explanation. See Ri ta v. United States , 551 U.S. 338,

356

- 58 (2007)

.

To the extent Rodriguez argues that his sentence has resulted in an

unwarranted disparity with his co

- defendant, the record belies this contention

.

AFFIRMED.
### §5307. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary for carrying out this chapter $5,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, and 1997, to be derived from such sums as are otherwise authorized under section 13451(e) of title 42.

(Pub. L. 101–425, §8, Oct. 15, 1990, 104 Stat. 919; Pub. L. 102–486, title XXI, §2106(b), Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3070.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–486 substituted "1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, and 1997, to be derived from such sums as are otherwise authorized under section 13451(e) of title 42" for "and 1993".
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Chun Lu, the Chief Executive Officer of TEC
TECHNOLOGY, INC. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

1. The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2010 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this
statement this 15th day of November, 2010.

/s/ Chun
LuChun Lu Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to TEC Technology, Inc. and will be retained by TEC
Technology, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.

---
# The Attorney General of Texas
December 14, 1978 JOHN L.HILL Attorney General

supreme CO””Building P.O. BOX 1.2548 Austin,TX.78711 51*,4x-2501 Mr.DonR.Stiles Executive Director Texas Adult Probation Commission P.0. Box12427 Austin, Texas 78701 Opinion No.H-1283 Re: Authority of the Adult Probation Commission to provide assistance for supervision of persons onpre-trial bond. Dear Mr.Stiles: You have asked if the Texas Adult Probation Commission may provide state aid to judicial districts to be used by probation departments for supervision of persons released from custody on pre-trial bond and pre-trial diversion programs. The Texas Adult Probation Commission is created by article 42.121, Code of Criminal Procedure. The purpose ofthe commission is

to make probation services available throughout the state, to improve the effectiveness of probation services, to provide alternatives to incarceration by providing financial aid to judicial districts for the establishment and improvement of probation services and community-based correctional programs and facilities other than jails or prisons, and to establish uniform probation administration standards. Section 1.01. The commission is empowered to provide financial assistance to judicial districts for these purposes. Section 4.01. The money appropriated by the legislature for this purpose is required to be the amount necessary to maintain and improve state-wide probation services. Section 4.02. The commission is authorized to cooperate with other governmental agencies “to improve probation services. ” Section 3.04. It may apply for ,sndaccept gifts or grants for use in “maintaining and improving probation services.” Section 3.03.The powers and duties of the commission are all cast in terms of probation, which isa post-trial procedure. Code Crim. Proc. arts. 42.12,g2; 42.13, S 2. Accordingly, we do not believe that under present law the commission has authority to fund apre-trial release program.

P. 5066Mr.DonR.Stiles - Page 2 (H-1283)

SUMMARY The Texas Adult Probation Commission does not have authority under present law to provide financial assistance to pre-trial release programs.

Attorney General ofTexas APPROVED: //

Opinion Committee

P. 5067
#### § 115.72 Evidentiary standard for administrative investigations.

The agency shall impose no standard higher than a preponderance of the evidence in determining whether allegations of sexual abuse or sexual harassment are substantiated.
-  Home 

# Massena; Eisenhower Lock; Visitors' Center; Summer; Vacation; Shipping

    This page shows Department of Transportation content pertaining to a specific tag. If you cannot find what you’re looking for on this page, please use the search box in the top right of our website.  

  Subscribe to Massena; Eisenhower Lock; Visitors' Center; Summer; Vacation; Shipping

# St. Lawrence Seaway Visitor Center at Eisenhower Lock

Admission: FreeAverage Length of Visit: 11⁄2 hoursLocation: 76 Barnhart Island Road, Massena, NY 13662Days & Hours of Operation: ...
Rete lakay ou lè ou malad,

sòf pou al pran swen medikal.

Lave men ou souvan avèk savon 

ak dlo pandan 20 segonn omwen.

Kouvri tous ou oswa etènye ou avèk yon 

klinèks, apre sa jete 

klinèks la nan fatra.

Netwaye ak dezenfekte objè ak 

sifas moun manyen souvan yo.

Evite manyen zye ou, nen ou ak bouch ou. 

Evite kontak pwòch avèk moun ki malad yo. 

Ede anpeche pwopagasyon maladi respiratwa tankou COVID-19.

SISPANN PWOPAGASYON JÈM

cdc.gov/COVID19

CS314915-R March 16, 2020 1:02 PM
§ 2.13 Initial hearing; procedure. ( a ) An initial hearing shall be conducted by a single hearing examiner unless the Regional Commissioner orders that the hearing be conducted by a panel of two examiners. The examiner shall discuss with the prisoner his offense severity rating and salient factor score as described in § 2.20, his institutional conduct and, in addition, any other matter the examiner may deem relevant.
( b ) A prisoner may be represented at a hearing by a person of his or her choice. The function of the prisoner's representative shall be to offer a statement at the conclusion of the interview of the prisoner by the examiner, and to provide such additional information as the examiner shall request. Interested parties who oppose parole may select a representative to appear and offer a statement. The hearing examiner shall limit or exclude any irrelevant or repetitious statement.
( c ) At the conclusion of the hearing, the examiner shall discuss the decision to be recommended by the examiner and the reasons therefor, except in the extraordinary circumstance of a complex issue that requires further deliberation before a recommendation can be made. Written notice of the decision shall be mailed or transmitted to the prisoner within 21 days of the date of the hearing, except in emergencies. Whenever the Commission initially establishes a release date (or modifies the release date thereafter), the prisoner shall also receive in writing the reasons therefor.
( d ) In accordance with 18 U.S.C. 4206, the reasons for establishment of a release date shall include a guidelines evaluation statement containing the prisoner's offense severity rating and salient factor score (including the points credited on each item of such score) as described in § 2.20, as well as the specific factors and information relied upon for any decision outside the range indicated by the guidelines.
( e ) No interviews with the Commission, or any representative thereof, shall be granted to a prisoner unless his name is docketed for a hearing in accordance with Commission procedures. Hearings shall not be open to the public.
( f ) A full and complete record of every hearing shall be retained by the Commission. Upon a request, pursuant to § 2.56, the Commission shall make available to any eligible prisoner such record as the Commission has retained of the hearing.
[42 FR 39809, Aug. 5, 1977, as amended at 45 FR 6381, Jan. 28, 1980; 47 FR 25736, June 15, 1982; 48 FR 23183, May 24, 1983; 59 FR 45625, Sept. 2, 1994; 68 FR 41528, July 14, 2003]
### §8710. Suspension or termination

#### (a) Mandatory suspension or termination

The Secretary shall suspend or terminate an order or a provision of an order if the Secretary finds that an order or provision of an order obstructs or does not tend to effectuate the purpose of this chapter, or if the Secretary determines that the order or a provision of an order is not favored by a majority of all votes cast in the referendum as provided in section 8706(a)(2) of this title.

#### (b) Implementation of suspension or termination

If, as a result of a referendum conducted under section 8706 of this title, the Secretary determines that the order is not approved, the Secretary shall—

(1) not later than 180 days after making the determination, suspend or terminate, as the case may be, collection of assessments under the order; and

(2) as soon as practicable, suspend or terminate, as the case may be, activities under the order in an orderly manner.

(Pub. L. 115–254, div. E, §1311, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3482.)