alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeLatest FilingsPrevious Page

    - SEC Home  »
    - Search the Next-Generation EDGAR System  »
    - Company Search  »
    - Current Page

80 UNIVERSITY AVENUEWESTWOOD MA 02090         

80 UNIVERSITY AVENUEWESTWOOD MA 02090         781-471-3500

Meketa Infrastructure Fund CIK#: 0001988752 (see all company filings)
State location: MA | State of Inc.: **DE**Get **insider transactions** for this **issuer**.File Number: **812-15506**

||
||
EXHIBIT 21.1

                  GLOBAL MARINE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                       as of February 23, 1996               


                                  STATE OR OTHER  PERCENT OF
VOTING
                                  JURISDICTION OF STOCK OWNED BY
NAME OF COMPANY                   INCORPORATION   IMMEDIATE PARENT

Global Marine Inc.                     Delaware          -
   Applied Drilling Technology Inc.    Texas           100%
   Arctic Systems Ltd.                 Canada          100%
   Challenger Minerals Inc.            California      100%
     WO Offshore, Inc.                 Texas            50%
   Global Marine Arctic Ltd.           Canada          100%
   Global Marine B.V.                  The Netherlands 100%
   Global Marine Baltic Inc.           Delaware        100%
   Global Marine Bismarck Sea Inc.     Delaware        100%
     Global Marine International
        Services Corporation           Bahamas         100% 
   Global Marine Capital
        Investments Inc.               Delaware        100%
     Global Marine Beaufort Sea Inc.   Delaware        100%
   Global Marine Corporate
        Services Inc.                  California      100%
   Global Marine Deepwater
        Drilling Inc.                  Delaware        100%
     Global Marine Australia Inc.      Delaware        100%
     Global Marine West Africa Inc.    Delaware        100%
     Petdrill, Inc.                    Delaware        100%
   Global Marine Drilling Company      California      100%
     Global Marine Caribbean, Inc.     California      100%
     Global Marine Development Inc.    California      100%
     Global Marine do Brasil
        Perfuracoes                    Brazil           50%  (1)
     Global Marine Drilling Services   California      100%
         Global Dolphin Drilling
         Company Private Limited       India            40%
   Global Marine Drilling (Malaysia)
         Sdn. Bhd.                     Malaysia        100%
   Global Marine Integrated Services
         - International Inc.          Delaware        100%
   Global Marine North Sea Inc.        Delaware        100%
   Global Marine Oil & Gas Company     Delaware        100%
   Global Marine U.K. Limited          Scotland        100%
   Global Marine de Venezuela Inc.     Delaware        100%
   Global Offshore Drilling Ltd.       Nigeria          60%
   Intermarine Services Inc.           Texas           100%
   Marican Offshore Drilling
          Services, Inc.               Canada          100%

___________________________

(1) The remaining 50% of the voting stock is owned directly by
Global Marine Inc.
**Exhibit 99.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the Annual Report of MK Gold Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, G. Frank Joklik,Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and 

(2)      The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

  

|                                                                                       |   |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ G. FRANK JOKLIK                                                                        |   |   |   |
|                                                                                            |   |   |   |
| **G. Frank Joklik****Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer****March 31, 2003** |   |   |   |

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to MK Gold Company and will be retained by MK Gold Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 115.17 Hiring and promotion decisions. ( a ) The agency shall not hire or promote anyone who may have contact with inmates, and shall not enlist the services of any contractor who may have contact with inmates, who— ( 1 ) Has engaged in sexual abuse in a prison, jail, lockup, community confinement facility, juvenile facility, or other institution (as defined in 42 U.S.C. 1997);
( 2 ) Has been convicted of engaging or attempting to engage in sexual activity in the community facilitated by force, overt or implied threats of force, or coercion, or if the victim did not consent or was unable to consent or refuse; or
( 3 ) Has been civilly or administratively adjudicated to have engaged in the activity described in paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
( b ) The agency shall consider any incidents of sexual harassment in determining whether to hire or promote anyone, or to enlist the services of any contractor, who may have contact with inmates.
( c ) Before hiring new employees who may have contact with inmates, the agency shall: ( 1 ) Perform a criminal background records check; and
( 2 ) Consistent with Federal, State, and local law, make its best efforts to contact all prior institutional employers for information on substantiated allegations of sexual abuse or any resignation during a pending investigation of an allegation of sexual abuse.
( d ) The agency shall also perform a criminal background records check before enlisting the services of any contractor who may have contact with inmates.
( e ) The agency shall either conduct criminal background records checks at least every five years of current employees and contractors who may have contact with inmates or have in place a system for otherwise capturing such information for current employees.
( f ) The agency shall ask all applicants and employees who may have contact with inmates directly about previous misconduct described in paragraph (a) of this section in written applications or interviews for hiring or promotions and in any interviews or written self-evaluations conducted as part of reviews of current employees. The agency shall also impose upon employees a continuing affirmative duty to disclose any such misconduct.
( g ) Material omissions regarding such misconduct, or the provision of materially false information, shall be grounds for termination.
( h ) Unless prohibited by law, the agency shall provide information on substantiated allegations of sexual abuse or sexual harassment involving a former employee upon receiving a request from an institutional employer for whom such employee has applied to work.
EXHIBIT
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of AmREIT (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Chad C.
Braun, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.







Date:
            March
      26, 2008
            
            By:
            /s/
      Chad C. Braun, Chief Financial
Officer
|   | a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                            |        /s/ Michael R. Elia                    |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Michael R. Elia Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officerand Chief Accounting Officer(Principal Financial Officer) |
§ 16.84 Exemption of Immigration Appeals System. ( a ) The following system of records is exempt from 5 U.S.C. 552a(d) (2), (3) and (4): ( 1 ) Decisions of the Board of Immigration Appeals (JUSTICE/BIA-001). This exemption applies only to the extent that information in this system is subject to exemption pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k).
( b ) Exemptions from the particular subsections are justified for the following reasons: ( 1 ) From subsections (d) (2), (3) and (4) because the decisions reflected constitute official records of opinions rendered in quasi-judicial proceedings. Administrative due process could not be achieved by the ex parte “correction” of such opinions by the subject of the opinion.
| Date:  February 10, 2011 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | By:    | /s/ James Rudis                 |
|------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------------|
|                               |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | James Rudis                     |
|                               |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | Chief Executive Officer         |
|                               |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | (principal executive officer)   |
|                               |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |                            |
|                               |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |                            |
|                               |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |                            |
| Date:  February 10, 2011 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | By:    | /s/ Tracy E. Quinn              |
|                               |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | Tracy E. Quinn                  |
|                               |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | Interim Chief Financial Officer |
|                               |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | (principal financial officer)   |
**EXHIBIT 23.01**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

The Board of Directors 

Macromedia, Inc.

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theregistration statements (Nos. 333-98495, 333-67960, 333-77040, 333-57708, 333-44016, 333-92233, 333-89247, 333-64141, 333-39285, 333-24713 and 333-08435) on Form S-8 of Macromedia, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated April 22, 2004, except forNote 3, which is as of June 9, 2005, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Macromedia, Inc. and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2004 and 2003 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensiveincome (loss) and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2004 and the accompanying financial statement schedule, which report appears in the March 31, 2004, annual report on Form 10-K/A, Amendment No. 1, ofMacromedia, Inc. 

 

Our report refers to the restatement of theconsolidated financial statements and related financial statement schedule. Our report also refers to the Company’s change in method of accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets on April 1, 2002. 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

 

Mountain View, CA 

June 9, 2005
### §4405. Injunctions

The several district courts of the United States are vested with jurisdiction, for cause shown, to prevent and restrain violations of sections 4402 and 4403 of this title upon application of the Federal Trade Commission in the case of a violation of section 4402 of this title or upon application of the Attorney General of the United States acting through the several United States attorneys in their several districts in the case of a violation of section 4402 or 4403 of this title.

(Pub. L. 99–252, §6, Feb. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 33.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective one year after Feb. 27, 1986, see section 11(a) of Pub. L. 99–252, set out as a note under section 4401 of this title.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report of GoAmerica, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended  September 30, 2006 filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),  I, Donald G. Barnhart,  Chief Financial
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects,  the consolidated  financial  condition of the Company as of the dates
presented and consolidated  results of operations of the Company for the periods
presented.

Dated: November 8, 2006

                                                     /s/ Donald G. Barnhart
                                                     -----------------------
                                                     Donald G. Barnhart
                                                     Chief Financial Officer

This  certification  has been  furnished  solely  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


                                     - 25 -
|  |  | Home | Jobs |          Fast Answers | Site Map | **Search** |  |
|--|--|--------------------------------------------------------------|--|
|  |  |
|  |
|  |  |
|  |

|  |
|--|
### NU M BER 13- 08- 0059 6-C V 

## COURT OF A PP EA LS T H I R T E E N T H D I S T R I C T O F T E X AS CORPUS CHRI ST I -E DI NBURG

____ ___ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _____ DA VID HA JOVSK Y, A pp ellan t,

v . C OU N TY OF G ON ZA L ES , A p p el le e.

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ___ _ _ _ _ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ __ On ap pe al f rom th e 2 5th D istrict Co urt of Go nzale s C ou nty , T exas .

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ 

## ME MOR A N D U M OP I N I ON B ef or e C hi ef

Just i ce Val dez and Just i ces Ro dr i guez and B enav i des M em or andu m O pi ni on P erC ur i am This cas e is before the Cou rt on an ag re ed/j oin t moti on to dis mis s appe a l. The par ti es hav e ag re ed th at t he tr ial court ’sOrder Grant ing Injuncti on is not a f ina l order , and therefore, thi s C our

t doe s n ot ha v e appel lat e j uris d ict ion ov er thi s c ase at t histi me. Pursuantto ag re ement, the p arti es re q uestthi s C our t t o di smi ss the appeal

.2

The Co urt, hav ing co nsi dered th e documents on f il e and par ti es’ ag re ed/j oin t moti on to di smi ss the appeal , i s o f t h e o p ini on th at t he moti on s houl d be g ra nted. SeeT EX . R. A PP . P. 42.1(a). T he p arties’ agreed/ joint m otion to dism iss is grant ed, and the ap pea l is hereby D ISM ISSE D. C ost s w il l be ta x ed ag ain st appel lan t. SeeT EX . R. A PP . P. 4 2.1( d) ("A bsentag re ement of the parti es, the cour t w il l tax co stsag ain st the a ppel lan t.")

. Hav ing dis mis sed the a ppeal at the part ies ’ re q uest , no moti on for re hear ing w il l be ent ertai ned, and our mandate w il l is sue forthw it h.

P E RC U R I A M Me moran dum Opi nio n del ivered and filed thi s t he 15t h day

of Janua ry , 200 9.
### **CHAPTER 10—NORTHERN PACIFIC HALIBUT FISHING**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—NORTHERN PACIFIC HALIBUT ACT OF 1924

Sec.
761 to 769. Omitted.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—NORTHERN PACIFIC HALIBUT ACT OF 1932

771 to 771j. Omitted.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—NORTHERN PACIFIC HALIBUT ACT OF 1937

772 to 772j. Repealed.

#### SUBCHAPTER IV—NORTHERN PACIFIC HALIBUT ACT OF 1982

773.
Definitions.
773a.
International Pacific Halibut Commission.
773b.
Acceptance or rejection of Commission recommendations.
773c.
General responsibility.
773d.
Cooperation of Federal agencies.
773e.
Prohibited acts.
773f.
Civil penalties.
773g.
Crimes and criminal penalties.
773h.
Forfeitures.
773i.
Administration and enforcement.
773j.
Authorization of appropriations.
773k.
Location of office space and other facilities on or near University of Washington campus in State of Washington.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-60096

Summary Calendar

 

WENDELL DUNCAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

STEVE PUCKETT et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 4:95-CV-278-S-B

- - - - - - - - - -

May 27, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHÉ, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Wendell Duncan appeals the dismissal of his civil-rights

complaint pursuant to § 1915(d). Duncan contends that the

defendants violated his Eighth Amendment rights by placing him in

a single cell with another inmate. Duncan seeks monetary damages

and release from prison. Duncan abandons on appeal his arguments

that the defendants violated his Eighth Amendment rights by

creating a health risk as a result of the double-celling and that

the defendants violated his constitutional rights by failing to
provide him showers and yard time. Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d

222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993). 

Duncan raises on appeal the argument that he was denied due

process by his improper placement in administrative segregation. 

however, Duncan raised this argument in the district court in his

Rule 60(b) motion for relief from judgment. Duncan failed to

appeal the denial of his Rule 60(b) motion; therefore, this

argument is not properly before this court. 

We have reviewed the record and Duncan’s brief and AFFIRM

the district court’s dismissal because Duncan failed to allege a

legally arguable constitutional claim. See Wilson v. Seiter, 501

U.S. 294, 297-98 (1991); Rhodes v. Chapman, 452 U.S. 337, 347

(1981); Stokes v. Delcambre, 710 F.2d 1120, 1124 (5th Cir. 1983).

The district court did not err by failing to hold a Spears

hearing because Duncan’s claims are not based on a legally

arguable position. Eason v. Thaler, 14 F.3d 8, 9-10 (5th Cir.

1994). 

We caution Duncan that any frivolous appeals filed by him or

on his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions in the

future. To avoid sanctions, Duncan is further cautioned to

review all pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise

arguments that are frivolous because they have been previously

decided by this court. 

AFFIRMED. SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of SiVault Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Wayne
Taylor, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.



Dated:  June 15, 2006                          /s/ Wayne Taylor
                                               -------------------------------
                                               Wayne Taylor
                                               Interim Chief Financial Officer


                                      -37-
EXHIBIT 10.28


COMPANY:  Global Marine Inc.  (the "Company")

ITEM:     Resolutions of the Board of Directors

SUBJECT:  Directors  Compensation

DATE:     August 3, 1994



          RESOLVED that the resolutions of this Board of Directors
adopted on August 24, 1989, relating to directors  fees and expense
reimbursement be, and they hereby are, superseded in their entirety
effective January 1, 1995, and that the following resolutions be,
and they hereby are, effective in their stead as said date; and it
was further

          RESOLVED that the fees payable to directors of the
Company who are not officers or employees of the Company be, and
they hereby are, $6,000 per quarter (payable with respect to each
calendar quarter at the regular meeting of the Board of Directors
during such calendar quarter), $900 for attendance at each regular
meeting of the Board of Directors, $1,500 for attendance at each
special meeting of the Board of Directors, and $500 for attendance
at each meeting of any Committee of the Board of Directors, in each
case effective January 1, 1995; and it was further

          RESOLVED that each director shall be reimbursed for all
expenses incurred by such director in attending each meeting of the
Board of Directors of the Company including regular meetings,
special meetings and meetings of any Committee of the Board of
Directors and they payment of such expenses shall be made upon
receipt by the Company of an invoice or expense account covering
such expenses.