alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §639b. Oversight

#### (a) Compliance with oversight requirements

#### (1) In general

Except as provided in paragraph (2), on and after December 27, 2020, the Administrator shall comply with any data or information requests or inquiries made by the Comptroller General of the United States not later than 15 days (or such later date as the Comptroller General may specify) after receiving the request or inquiry.

#### (2) Exception

If the Administrator is unable to comply with a request or inquiry described in paragraph (1) before the applicable date described in that paragraph, the Administrator shall, before such applicable date, submit to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate and the Committee on Small Business of the House of Representatives a notification that includes a detailed justification for the inability of the Administrator to comply with the request or inquiry.

#### (b) Testimony

Not later than the date that is 120 days after December 27, 2020, and not less than twice each year thereafter until the date that is 2 years after December 27, 2020, the Administrator and the Secretary of the Treasury shall testify before the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate and the Committee on Small Business of the House of Representatives regarding implementation of this Act and the amendments made by this Act.

(Pub. L. 116–260, div. N, title III, §321, Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2017.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in subsec. (b), probably means title III of div. N of Pub. L. 116–260, Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 1993, known as the Economic Aid to Hard-Hit Small Businesses, Nonprofits, and Venues Act. For complete classification of title III to the Code, see Short Title of 2020 Amendment note set out under section 9001 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Economic Aid to Hard-Hit Small Businesses, Nonprofits, and Venues Act, and not as part of the Small Business Act which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on Dec. 27, 2020, and applicable to loans and grants made on or after Dec. 27, 2020, see section 348 of Pub. L. 116–260, set out as an Effective Date of 2020 Amendment note under section 636 of this title.

#### Definition of "Administrator"

"Administrator" means the Administrator of the Small Business Administration, see section 302 of Pub. L. 116–260, set out as a note under section 9001 of this title.
**Exhibit 21**

Subsidiaries of Registrant

| **Company**                                         |   | **State of   Jurisdiction of   Organization** |   | **Percentage   of Voting   Securities   Owned** |
|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
|                                                     |   |                                               |   |                                                 |
| Southeast   Power Corporation                       |   | Florida                                       |   | 100%                                            |
| Bayswater   Development Corporation                 |   | Florida                                       |   | 100%                                            |
| Subsidiaries   of Bayswater Development Corporation |   |                                          |   |                                            |
| Country Club Point of Brevard, Inc.                 |   | Florida                                       |   | 100%                                            |
| Riomar of Brevard, Inc.                             |   | Florida                                       |   | 100%                                            |
| Cape Club of Brevard, Inc.                          |   | Florida                                       |   | 100%                                            |
| Florida Coastal Homes, Inc.                         |   | Florida                                       |   | 100%                                            |
| Oak Park of Brevard, Inc.                           |   | Florida                                       |   | 100%                                            |
| Pineapple House of Brevard, Inc.                    |   | Florida                                       |   | 100%                                            |
| Florida   Transport Corporation                     |   | Florida                                       |   | 100%                                            |
| 7-1-99 Corp.   (inactive)                           |   | Florida                                       |   | 100%                                            |
| Steeple Rock   Mining Company (inactive)            |   | Florida                                       |   | 100%                                            |
| Mamba   Engineering Company, Inc. (inactive)        |   | Florida                                       |   | 100%                                            |

All of the above subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company at December 31, 2006.

----
### §7410. Grant eligibility requirements and compliance with immigration laws

#### (a) Immigration status

No grant or fellowship may be awarded under this chapter, directly or indirectly, to any individual who is in violation of the terms of his or her status as a nonimmigrant under section 1101(a)(15)(F), (M), or (J) of title 8.

#### (b) Aliens from certain countries

No grant or fellowship may be awarded under this chapter, directly or indirectly, to any alien from a country that is a state sponsor of international terrorism, as defined under section 1735(b) of title 8, unless the Secretary of State determines, in consultation with the Attorney General and the heads of other appropriate agencies, that such alien does not pose a threat to the safety or national security of the United States.

#### (c) Non-complying institutions

No grant or fellowship may be awarded under this chapter, directly or indirectly, to any institution of higher education or non-profit institution (or consortia thereof) that has—

(1) materially failed to comply with the recordkeeping and reporting requirements to receive nonimmigrant students or exchange visitor program participants under section 1101(a)(15)(F), (M), or (J) of title 8, or section 1372 of title 8, as required by section 1762 of title 8; or

(2) been suspended or terminated pursuant to section 1762(c) of title 8.

(Pub. L. 107–305, §16, Nov. 27, 2002, 116 Stat. 2381.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 107–305, Nov. 27, 2002, 116 Stat. 2367, known as the Cyber Security Research and Development Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 7401 of this title and Tables.
UAV/UAS Aircraft Specifications

DJI PHANTOM 3 PROFESSIONAL Weight (including battery and propellers) 1280 g Diagonal size (including propellers) 590 mm Max Ascent Speed 5 m/s Max Descent Speed 3 m/s Hover Accuracy Aircraft

. Vertical: +/- 0.1 m (when Vision Positioning is active) or +/- 0.5 m

. Horizontal: +/- 1.5 m Max Speed 16 m/s (ATTI mode, no wind)Max Altitude Above Sea Level

6000 m Operating Temperature 0°C to 40°C GPS Mode GPS/GLONASS Camera Sensor Sony EX MOR 1/2.3” Effective pixels: 12.4 M (total pixels: 12.76 M) Lens FOV 94° 20 mm (35 mm format equivalent) f/2.8, focus at 8 ISO Range 100 - 3200 (video) 100 - 1600 (photo) Shutter Speed 8s - 1/8000sImage Max Size

4000 x 3000 Still Photography Modes

. Single Shot

. Burst Shooting: 3/5/7 shots

. Auto Exposure Bracketing (AEB): 3/5

. Bracketed Frames at 0.7EV Bias

. Time - lapse Video Recording Modes

. UHD: 4096x2160p 24/25, 3840x2160p 24/25/30

. FHD: 1920x1080p 24/25/30/48/50/60

. HD: 1280x720p 24/25/30/48/50/60 Supported SD Card TypesMicro SD

Max capacity: 64 GB. Class 10 or UHS - 1 rating required Max Bitrate of Video Storage 60 Mbps Supported File Formats

. FAT32/exFAT

. Photo: JPEG, DNG

. Video: MP4, MOV (MP EG -4 AVC/H.264) Operating Temperature 0°C to 40°C Gimbal
Vision Positioning Remote Controller Controllable RangePitch - 90° to +30°

Stabilization 3 - axis (pitch, roll, yaw) Max Velocity Less than 8 m/s (when 2 m above ground) Altit ude Range 30 cm - 300 cm Operating Range 30 cm - 300 cm Operating Environment Surface with clear pattern and adequate lighting (Lux > 15) Operating Frequency 2.400 GHz - 2.483 GHz Max Distance 2000m (outdoors and unobstructed)Video Output Port

USB Operating Temperature 0°C - 40°C Battery 6000 mAh LiPo 2S Mobile Device Holder For tablet or phone Receiver Sensitivity (1%PER)

- 101 dBm ±2 dBm Transmitter Power (EIRP)

. FCC: 20 dBm

. CE: 16 dBmWorking Voltage

1.2 A @7. 4 V Battery Charger Intelligent Flight Battery App / Live View Voltage 17.4 V Rated Power

. 100 W Capacity 4480 mAh Voltage 15.2 V Battery TypeLiPo 4S

Energy 68 Wh Net Weight 365 g Max Flight Time Approximately 23 m inutes Operating Temperature

- 10°C to 40°C Max Charging Power 100 W Mobile App DJI Pilot EIRP100mW

Live View Working Frequency 2.4GHz ISM Live View Quality 720P @ 30fps (depending on conditions and mobile device) Latency 220ms (depending on conditions and mobile device) Required Operating Systems

. iOS 8.0 or later

. Android 4.1.2 or later Recommended Devices

. iOS: iPhone 5s, iPhone 6, iPhone 6 Plus, iPad Air, iPad Air Wi - Fi + Cellular, iPad mini 2, iPad mini 2 Wi - Fi + Cellular, iPad Air 2, iPad Air 2 Wi - Fi + Cellular, iPad mini 3, and iPad mini 3 Wi - Fi + Cellular. This app is optimized for iPhone 5s, iPhone 6, and iPhone 6 Plus.

Android: Samsung S5, Note 3, Sony Xperia Z3, Google Nexus 7 II, Google Nexus 9, Mi 3, Nubia Z7 mini

. *Support for additional Android devices available as testing and development continues
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 601 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 601

 To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit former Members and 
 elected officers of Congress from lobbying Congress at any time after 
                            leaving office.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 28, 2019

    Mr. Braun (for himself and Mr. Scott of Florida) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit former Members and 
 elected officers of Congress from lobbying Congress at any time after 
                            leaving office.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Banning Lobbying And Safeguarding 
Trust Act'' or the ``BLAST Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITING FORMER MEMBERS AND OFFICERS OF CONGRESS FROM 
              LOBBYING CONGRESS.

    (a) Prohibition.--Section 207(e) of title 18, United States Code, 
is amended by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the following:
            ``(1) Members and elected officers of congress.--Any person 
        who is a Senator, a Member of the House of Representatives, or 
        an elected officer of the Senate or the House of 
        Representatives and who, after that person leaves office, 
        knowingly makes, with the intent to influence, any 
        communication to or appearance before any Member, officer, or 
        employee of either House of Congress or any employee of any 
        other legislative office of Congress, on behalf of any other 
        person (except the United States) in connection with any matter 
        on which the former Senator, Member, or elected official seeks 
        action by a Member, officer, or employee of either House of 
        Congress, in his or her official capacity, shall be punished as 
        provided in section 216.''.
    (b) Technical and Conforming Amendments.--Section 207(e)(2) of 
title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in the heading, by striking ``Officers and staff'' and 
        inserting ``Staff'';
            (2) by striking ``an elected officer of the Senate, or'';
            (3) by striking ``office or''; and
            (4) by striking ``former elected officer or''.
    (c) Applicability.--The amendments made by this section shall apply 
with respect to an individual who leaves office on or after the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 738 

To require the Federal Communications Commission to make the provision 

of Wi-Fi access on school buses eligible for E-rate support. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 12, 2019 

Mr. UDALL (for himself, Mr. GARDNER, Ms. CORTEZ MASTO, and Mr. 

WHITEHOUSE) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To require the Federal Communications Commission to make 

the provision of Wi-Fi access on school buses eligible 

for E-rate support. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. E-RATE SUPPORT FOR SCHOOL BUS WI-FI. 

4 (a) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘school 

5 bus’’ means a passenger motor vehicle that is— 

6 (1) designed to carry a driver and not less than 

7 5 passengers; and 

8 (2) used significantly to transport early child 

9 education, elementary school, or secondary school 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 738 IS

1 students to or from school or an event related to 

2 school. 

3 (b) RULEMAKING.—Notwithstanding the limitations 

4 under paragraphs (1)(B) and (2)(A) of section 254(h) of 

5 the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 254(h)) re6 garding the authorized recipients and uses of discounted 

7 telecommunications services, not later than 180 days after 

8 the date of enactment of this Act, the Federal Commu9 nications Commission shall commence a rulemaking to 

10 make the provision of Wi-Fi access on school buses eligible 

11 for support under the E-rate program of the Commission 

12 set forth under subpart F of part 54 of title 47, Code 

13 of Federal Regulations. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
# C_2010317EN.01004501.xml

| 20.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 317/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 317/45

---

Action brought on 28 September 2010 — HerkuPlast Kubern v OHIM — How (eco-pack)

(Case T-445/10)

()

2010/C 317/79

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: HerkuPlast Kubern GmbH (Ering, Germany) (represented by: G. Würtenberger and R. Kunze, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Heidi A.T. How (Harrow, United Kingdom)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 27 July 2010 in Case R 1014/2009-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 27 July 2010 in Case R 1014/2009-4;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Heidi A.T. How.

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark including the word element ‘eco-pack’, for goods in Class 16.

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: German word mark and international registration ‘ECOPAK’ for goods in Class 20.

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition rejected.

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (1) as there is a likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue, and infringement of Articles 75 and 76 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 in so far as the Board of Appeal dismissed altogether the existence of any likelihood of confusion, its reasoning is, at various points, inherently contradictory and it inappropriately rejected as irrelevant arguments submitted by the applicant that are in fact relevant.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

1

---
### SUBCHAPTER LIX–S—HOPEWELL CULTURE NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK
### §1010. Data

The Secretary shall collect and maintain data on a national and State by State basis concerning—

(1) expenditures for the individual flood control and conservation measures for which assistance is provided under this chapter; and

(2) the expected flood control or environmental (including soil erosion) benefits that will result from the implementation of such measures.

(Aug. 4, 1954, ch. 656, §13, as added Pub. L. 101–624, title XIV, §1463, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3615.)
# C_2011173EN.01000603.xml

| 11.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 173/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 173/6

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 1 April 2011 — Azienda Sanitaria Locale di Lecce v Ordine degli Ingegneri della Provincia di Lecce and Others — Università del Salento

(Case C-159/11)

2011/C 173/12

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Azienda Sanitaria Locale di Lecce

Applicant:

Defendants: Ordine degli Ingegneri della Provincia di Lecce; Consiglio Nazionale degli Ingegneri; Associazione delle Organizzazioni di Ingegneri, di Architettura e di Consultazione Tecnico-Economica (Oice); Etacons Srl; Ing. Vito Prato Engineering Srl; Barletti — del Grosso & Associati Srl; Ordine degli Architetti della Provincia di Lecce; Consiglio Nazionale degli Architetti Pianificatori, Paesaggisti e Conservatori (Cnappc)

Defendants:

Intervener: Università del Salento

Intervener

Question referred

Question referred

Does Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts (1) and, in particular, Article 1(2)(a) and (d), Article 2 and Article 28 of that directive and Categories 8 and 12 in Annex II thereto, preclude national legislation which permits written agreements to be entered into between two contracting authorities for the study of the seismic vulnerability of hospital buildings and its evaluation in the light of national regulations on the safety of structures and of strategic buildings in particular, for a consideration not exceeding the costs incurred in the performance of the service, where the authority responsible for performance is capable of acting in the capacity of an economic operator?

1

---

(1)  OJ L 134, p. 114.

1

---
### §5401. Findings

The Congress finds that—

(1) the United States fastener industry is a significant contributor to the global economy, employing thousands of workers in hundreds of communities;

(2) the American economy uses billions of fasteners each year;

(3) state-of-the-art manufacturing and improved quality assurance systems have dramatically improved fastener quality, so virtually all fasteners sold in commerce meet or exceed the consensus standards for the uses to which they are applied;

(4) a small number of mismarked, misrepresented, and counterfeit fasteners do enter commerce in the United States; and

(5) multiple criteria for the identification of fasteners exist, including grade identification markings and manufacturer's insignia, to enable purchasers and users of fasteners to accurately evaluate the characteristics of individual fasteners.

(Pub. L. 101–592, §2, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 2943; Pub. L. 104–113, §11(a), Mar. 7, 1996, 110 Stat. 780; Pub. L. 106–34, §2, June 8, 1999, 113 Stat. 118.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1999—Pub. L. 106–34 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section consisted of subsecs. (a) and (b) stating findings of Congress and purpose of this chapter.

1996—Subsec. (a)(4) to (6). Pub. L. 104–113, §11(a)(1), redesignated pars. (5) to (7) as (4) to (6), respectively, and struck out former par. (4) which read as follows: "the sale in commerce of nonconforming fasteners and the use of nonconforming fasteners in numerous critical applications have reduced the combat readiness of the Nation's military forces, endangered the safety of other Federal projects and activities, and cost both the public and private sectors large sums in connection with the retesting and purging of fastener inventories;".

Subsec. (a)(7). Pub. L. 104–113, §11(a)(2), struck out "by lot number" after "traceability".

Pub. L. 104–113, §11(a)(1), redesignated par. (8) as (7). Former par. (7) redesignated (6).

Subsec. (a)(8), (9). Pub. L. 104–113, §11(a)(1), redesignated par. (9) as (8). Former par. (8) redesignated (7).

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 104–113, §11(a)(3), substituted "in commerce" for "used in critical applications".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title of 1999 Amendment

Pub. L. 106–34, §1, June 8, 1999, 113 Stat. 118, provided that: "This Act [enacting sections 5403, 5411a, and 5411b of this title, amending this section and sections 5402 and 5407 to 5411 of this title, repealing sections 5404 to 5406, 5412, and 5414 of this title, and enacting provisions set out as notes under sections 5402 and 5403 of this title] may be cited as the 'Fastener Quality Act Amendments Act of 1999'."

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 101–592, §1, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 2943, provided that: "This Act [enacting this chapter] may be cited as the 'Fastener Quality Act'."