Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 47 / Thursday, March 10, 2011 / Notices 13127 

1The Regulations are currently codified in the 

Code of Federal Regulations at 15 CFR Parts 730– 

774 (2010). The charged violations occurred in 

2008. The Regulations governing the violations at 

issue are found in the 2008 version of the Code of 

Federal Regulations (15 CFR Parts 730–774 (2008)). 

The 2010 Regulations set forth the procedures that 

apply to this matter. 

2 50 U.S.C. app. sections 2401–2420 (2000). Since 

August 21, 2001, the Act has been in lapse and the 

President, through Executive Order 13,222 of 

August 17, 2001 (3 CFR, 2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), 

as extended most recently by the Notice of August 

17, 2010 (75 FR 50,681 (Aug. 16, 2010)), has 

continued the Regulations in effect under the 

International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 

U.S.C. 1701 et seq.). 

exclude receipts from sales taxes and 

interest charges from credit sales. 

The estimates of inventories represent 

all merchandise held in wholesale 

locations, warehouses, and offices, as 

well as goods held by others for sale on 

consignment or in transit for 

distribution to wholesale 

establishments. The estimates of 

inventories exclude fixtures and 

supplies not for resale, as well as 

merchandise held on consignment 

which are owned by others. Inventories 

are an important component in the 

Bureau of Economic Analysis’s (BEA) 

calculation of the investment portion of 

the Gross Domestic Product (GDP). 

We publish wholesale sales and 

inventory estimates based on the North 

American Industry Classification 

System (NAICS) which has been widely 

adopted throughout both the public and 

private sectors. 

The Census Bureau tabulates the 

collected data to provide, with 

measurable reliability, statistics on 

sales, end-of-month inventories, and 

inventories/sales ratios for merchant 

wholesalers, excluding MSBOs. 

The BEA is the primary Federal user 

of data collected in the MWTS. The BEA 

uses data from this form to prepare the 

national income and product accounts 

(NIPA), input-output accounts (I–O), 

and gross domestic product (GDP) by 

industry. End-of-month inventories are 

used to prepare the change in private 

inventories component of GDP. Sales 

are used to prepare estimates of real 

inventory-sales ratios in the NIPAs, 

extrapolate proprietors’ income for 

wholesalers (until tax return data 

become available) in the NIPAs, and 

extrapolate annual current-dollar gross 

output for the most recent year in 

annual I–O tables, GDP-by-industry, and 

advance GDP-by-industry estimates. 

The Bureau of Labor Statistics uses 

the data as input to its Producer Price 

Indexes and in developing productivity 

measurements. Private businesses use 

the wholesale sales and inventory data 

in computing business activity indexes. 

Other government agencies and 

businesses use this information for 

market research, product development, 

and business planning to gauge the 

current trends of the economy. 

Affected Public: Business or other forprofit. 

Frequency: Monthly. 

Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary. 

Legal Authority: Title 13 U.S.C., 

Section 182. 

OMB Desk Officer: Brian HarrisKojetin, (202) 395–7314. 

Copies of the above information 

collection proposal can be obtained by 

calling or writing Diana Hynek, 

Departmental Paperwork Clearance 

Officer, (202) 482–0266, Department of 

Commerce, Room 6616, 14th and 

Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 

DC 20230 (or via the Internet at 

dhynek@doc.gov). 

Written comments and 

recommendations for the proposed 

information collection should be sent 

within 30 days of publication of this 

notice to Brian Harris-Kojetin, OMB 

Desk Officer either by fax (202–395– 

7245) or e-mail (bharrisk@omb.eop.gov). 

Dated: March 4, 2011. 

Glenna Mickelson, 

Management Analyst, Office of the Chief 

Information Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2011–5435 Filed 3–9–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–07–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Bureau of Industry and Security 

Action Affecting Export Privileges; 

Amy Farrow 

In the Matter of: Amy Farrow, 1493 

Sanbrook Ct., Bethlehem, PA 18015, 

Respondent 

Order Relating to Amy Farrow 

The Bureau of Industry and Security, 

U.S. Department of Commerce (‘‘BIS’’), 

has notified Amy Farrow, in her 

individual capacity and as sole 

proprietor of The Wholesale Discount 

Store of Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 

(‘‘Farrow’’), of its intention to initiate an 

administrative proceeding against 

Farrow pursuant to Section 766.3 of the 

Export Administration Regulations (the 

‘‘Regulations’’) 1 and Section 13(c) of the 

Export Administration Act of 1979, as 

amended (the ‘‘Act’’),2 through the 

issuance of a Proposed Charging Letter 

to Farrow that alleged that she 

committed 116 violations of the 

Regulations. Specifically, the charges 

are: 

Charges 1–116 15 CFR 764.2(a): 

Exporting Stun Guns Without a License 

On 116 occasions between on or about 

January 1, 2008 and on or about July 20, 

2008, Farrow engaged in conduct prohibited 

by the Regulations by exporting items subject 

to the Regulations to various destinations 

without the required Department of 

Commerce authorization. Specifically, 

Farrow exported 254 stun guns, items subject 

to the Regulations, classified under Export 

Control Classification Number 0A985, and 

controlled for export to these destinations for 

crime control reasons, without the export 

licenses required by Section 742.7 of the 

Regulations. In exporting these items without 

a license, Farrow committed 116 violations of 

Section 764.2(a) of the Regulations. 

Whereas, BIS and Farrow have 

entered into a Settlement Agreement 

pursuant to Section 766.18(a) of the 

Regulations, whereby they agreed to 

settle this matter in accordance with the 

terms and conditions set forth therein; 

and 

Whereas, I have approved of the terms 

of such Settlement Agreement; 

It is therefore ordered: 

First, for a period of two years from 

the date of this Order, Amy Farrow, 

1493 Sanbrook Ct., Bethlehem, PA 

18015, her representatives, assigns or 

agents (hereinafter collectively referred 

to as ‘‘Denied Person’’) may not 

participate, directly or indirectly, in any 

way in any transaction involving any 

commodity, software or technology 

(hereinafter collectively referred to as 

‘‘item’’) exported or to be exported from 

the United States that is subject to the 

Regulations, or in any other activity 

subject to the Regulations, including, 

but not limited to: 

A. Applying for, obtaining, or using 

any license, License Exception, or 

export control document; 

B. Carrying on negotiations 

concerning, or ordering, buying, 

receiving, using, selling, delivering, 

storing, disposing of, forwarding, 

transporting, financing, or otherwise 

servicing in any way, any transaction 

involving any item exported or to be 

exported from the United States that is 

subject to the Regulations, or in any 

other activity subject to the Regulations; 

or 

C. Benefitting in any way from any 

transaction involving any item exported 

or to be exported from the United States 

that is subject to the Regulations, or in 

any other activity subject to the 

Regulations. 

Second, that no person may, directly 

or indirectly, do any of the following: 

A. Export or reexport to or on behalf 

of the Denied Person any item subject to 

the Regulations; 

B. Take any action that facilitates the 

acquisition or attempted acquisition by 


jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
13128 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 47 / Thursday, March 10, 2011 / Notices 

the Denied Person of the ownership, 

possession, or control of any item 

subject to the Regulations that has been 

or will be exported from the United 

States, including financing or other 

support activities related to a 

transaction whereby the Denied Person 

acquires or attempts to acquire such 

ownership, possession or control; 

C. Take any action to acquire from or 

to facilitate the acquisition or attempted 

acquisition from the Denied Person of 

any item subject to the Regulations that 

has been exported from the United 

States; 

D. Obtain from the Denied Person in 

the United States any item subject to the 

Regulations with knowledge or reason 

to know that the item will be, or is 

intended to be, exported from the 

United States; or 

E. Engage in any transaction to service 

any item subject to the Regulations that 

has been or will be exported from the 

United States and which is owned, 

possessed or controlled by the Denied 

Person, or service any item, of whatever 

origin, that is owned, possessed or 

controlled by the Denied Person if such 

service involves the use of any item 

subject to the Regulations that has been 

or will be exported from the United 

States. For purposes of this paragraph, 

servicing means installation, 

maintenance, repair, modification or 

testing. 

Third, that, after notice and 

opportunity for comment as provided in 

Section 766.23 of the Regulations, any 

person, firm, corporation, or business 

organization related to Farrow by 

affiliation, ownership, control, or 

position of responsibility in the conduct 

of trade or related services may also be 

made subject to the provisions of the 

Order. 

Fourth, that this Order does not 

prohibit any export, reexport, or other 

transaction subject to the Regulations 

where the only items involved that are 

subject to the Regulations are the 

foreign-produced direct product of U.S.- 

origin technology. 

Fifth, that, as authorized by Section 

766.18(c) of the Regulations, the second 

year of the two year denial period set 

forth above shall be suspended and 

shall thereafter be waived, provided that 

during the first year of the denial period 

and during the period of suspension, 

Farrow has commited no violation of 

the Act or any regulation, order or 

license issued thereunder. 

Sixth, that the Proposed Charging 

Letter, the Settlement Agreement, and 

this Order shall be made available to the 

public. 

This Order, which constitutes the 

final agency action in this matter, is 

effective immediately. 

Issued this 28th day of February, 2011. 

David W. Mills, 

Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export 

Enforcement. 

[FR Doc. 2011–5447 Filed 3–9–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DT–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–583–837] 

Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, 

Sheet, and Strip (PET Film) From 

Taiwan: Extension of Time Limit for the 

Preliminary Results of the 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 10, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Emily Halle or Gene Calvert, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 6, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–0176 or (202) 482– 

3586, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 31, 2010, the Department 

of Commerce (the Department) initiated 

the administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on PET Film 

from Taiwan covering the period July 1, 

2009, through June 30, 2010. See 

Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews and Deferral of Initiation of 

Administrative Review, 75 FR 53274 

(August 31, 2010). The current deadline 

for the preliminary results of review is 

April 2, 2011. 

Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary 

Results 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), 

the Department shall make a 

preliminary determination in an 

administrative review of an 

antidumping duty order within 245 

days after the last day of the anniversary 

month of the date of publication of the 

order. The Act further provides, 

however, that the Department may 

extend that 245-day period to 365 days 

if it determines it is not practicable to 

complete the review within the 

foregoing time period. 

The Department finds that it is not 

practicable to complete the preliminary 

results of the administrative review of 

PET Film from Taiwan within this time 

limit. Specifically, the Department 

granted an extension until March 2, 

2011 for Shinkong Synthetic Fibers 

Corporation to submit its supplemental 

questionnaire response. We will need 

additional time to review and analyze 

the supplemental questionnaire 

response when it is submitted. 

Therefore, in accordance with section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, the Department 

is extending the time period for 

completion of the preliminary results of 

this review from 245 days to 365 days; 

i.e., from April 2, 2011, until July 31, 

2011. 

However, July 31, 2011 falls on a 

Sunday, and it is the Department’s longstanding practice to issue a 

determination the next business day 

when the statutory deadline falls on a 

weekend, federal holiday, or any other 

day when the Department is closed. See 

Notice of Clarification: Application of 

‘‘Next Business Day’’ Rule for 

Administrative Determination Deadlines 

Pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, As 

Amended, 70 FR 24533 (May 10, 2005). 

Accordingly, the deadline for the 

completion of these preliminary results 

is now no later than August 1, 2011. 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(3)(A) 

and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: March 4, 2011. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2011–5515 Filed 3–9–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–821–819] 

Magnesium Metal From the Russian 

Federation: Revocation of 

Antidumping Duty Order Pursuant to 

Five-Year Sunset Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On March 1, 2010, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) initiated and the 

International Trade Commission (ITC) 

instituted the sunset review of the 

antidumping duty order on magnesium 

metal from the Russian Federation. On 

February 10, 2011, the ITC determined 


jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES