alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §715i. Restraining violations

#### (a) Mandatory injunction upon application of President

Upon application of the President, by the Attorney General, the United States District Courts shall have jurisdiction to issue mandatory injunctions commanding any person to comply with the provisions of this chapter or any regulation issued thereunder.

#### (b) Discretionary action in district court to enjoin acts or practices

Whenever it shall appear to the President that any person is engaged or about to engage in any acts or practices that constitute or will constitute a violation of any provision of this chapter or of any regulation thereunder, he may in his discretion, by the Attorney General, bring an action in the proper United States District Court to enjoin such acts or practices, and upon a proper showing a permanent or temporary injunction or restraining order shall be granted without bond.

#### (c) Exclusive jurisdiction of district court; review

The United States District Courts shall have exclusive jurisdiction of violations of this chapter or the regulations thereunder, and of all suits in equity and actions at law brought to enforce any liability or duty created by, or to enjoin any violation of, this chapter or the regulations thereunder. Any criminal proceeding may be brought in the district wherein any act or transaction constituting the violation occurred. Any suit or action to enforce any liability or duty created by this chapter or regulations thereunder, or to enjoin any violation of this chapter or any regulations thereunder, may be brought in any such district or in the district wherein the defendant is found or is an inhabitant or transacts business, and process in such cases may be served in any other district of which the defendant is an inhabitant or wherever the defendant may be found. Judgments and decrees so rendered shall be subject to review as provided in sections 1254, 1291, and 1292 of title 28.

(Feb. 22, 1935, ch. 18, §10, 49 Stat. 33.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

In subsec. (c), "sections 1254, 1291, and 1292 of title 28" substituted for "sections 128 and 240 of the Judicial Code, as amended [28 U.S.C. 225 and 347]" on authority of act June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 869, the first section of which enacted Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
Exhibit 32


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER AND INTERIM CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Overhill Farms, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the quarter ended March 30, 2008 (the “Report”), the undersigned
hereby certify in their capacities as Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:




1. the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2. the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:  May
      8, 2008
                  By:
                  /s/ James
      RudisJames
      RudisChief
      Executive Officer(principal executive
      officer)
 Date:  May
      8, 2008
                By:
                /s/ Tracy E.
      QuinnTracy E. QuinnInterim Chief
      Financial Officer(principal financial
      officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Office of Justice Programs

          - [OJP (NIJ) Docket No. 1546]

# AGENCY:

National Institute of Justice, DOJ.

# ACTION:

Notice and request for comments.

# SUMMARY:

In an effort to obtain comments from interested parties, the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice (NIJ) will make available to the general public two draft documents:
      - “Vehicular Digital Multimedia Evidence Recording System Certification Program Requirements for Law Enforcement”
      - “Law Enforcement Vehicular Digital Multimedia Evidence Recording System Selection and Application Guide”

                        The opportunity to provide comments on these documents is open to industry technical representatives, law enforcement agencies and organizations, research, development and scientific communities, and all other stakeholders and interested parties. Those individuals wishing to obtain and provide comments on the draft documents under consideration are directed to the following Web site:                         *http://www.justnet.org.*

# DATES:

The comment period will be open until April 25, 2011.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Casandra Robinson, by telephone at 202-305-2596 [                        *Note:*                         this is not a toll-free telephone number], or by e-mail at                         *casandra.robinson@usdoj.gov.*

John H. Laub,

Director, National Institute of Justice.

[FR Doc. 2011-5700 Filed 3-10-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-18-P
### SUBCHAPTER XCIII—CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER NATIONAL RECREATION AREA
# C_2010328EN.01005601.xml

| 4.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/56 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/56

---

Action brought on 7 October 2010 — Bank Mellat v Council

(Case T-496/10)

()

2010/C 328/86

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Bank Mellat (Tehran, Iran) (represented by: S. Gadhia, S. Ashley, Solicitors, D. Anderson, QC and R. Blakeley, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | annul paragraph 2 of Table B of the Annex to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2010 (1) in so far as it relates to the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul paragraph 2 of Table B of the Annex to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2010 (1) in so far as it relates to the applicant;

1

| — | annul paragraph 4 of Table B of Annex II to Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP (2) in so far as it relates to the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul paragraph 4 of Table B of Annex II to Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP (2) in so far as it relates to the applicant;

2

| — | order the Council to pay the costs of the application. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council to pay the costs of the application.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In the present case the applicant seeks the partial annulment of Council Implementing Regulation No 668/2010 and of Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP in so far as the applicant is included on the list of natural and legal persons, entities and bodies whose funds and economic resources are frozen in accordance with this provision.

The three pleas in law relied on by the applicant are identical or similar to the first, second and fifth pleas relied on in Case T-492/10 Melli Bank v Council.

Melli Bank

Council

---

(1)  Council implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2010 of 26 July 2010 implementing Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 concerning restrictive measures against Iran, OJ 2010 L 195, p. 25

1

(2)  Council Decision of 26 July 2010 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Common Position 2007/140/CFSP, OJ 2010 L 195, p. 39

2

---
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Service Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Pamela J. Montpelier, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and
Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-B (Item 601(b)(32)) promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Securities Act) and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act). In accordance with clause (ii) of
Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/ PAMELA J. MONTPELIER
|Pamela J. Montpelier    
|Chief Executive Officer 
|                        
|November 10, 2004
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 November 14, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Rocco B. CommissoRocco B. CommissoChairman and Chief Executive OfficerBy:
    /s/ Mark E. StephanMark E. StephanExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
§ 385.211 Protests other than under Rule 208 (Rule 211). ( a ) *General rule.* ( 1 ) Any person may file a protest to object to any application, complaint, petition, order to show cause, notice of tariff or rate examination, or tariff or rate filing.
( 2 ) The filing of a protest does not make the protestant a party to the proceeding. The protestant must intervene under Rule 214 to become a party.
( 3 ) Subject to paragraph (a)(4) of this section, the Commission will consider protests in determining further appropriate action. Protests will be placed in the public file associated with the proceeding.
( 4 ) If a proceeding is set for hearing under subpart E of this part, the protest is not part of the record upon which the decision is made.
( b ) *Service.* ( 1 ) Any protest directed against a person in a proceeding must be served by the protestant on the person against whom the protest is directed.
( 2 ) The Secretary may waive any procedural requirement of this subpart applicable to protests. If the requirement of service under this paragraph is waived, the Secretary will place the protest in the public file and may send a copy thereof to any person against whom the protest is directed.
RECORD OF DECISION

and

APPROVED

BUTTE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN

April 2009
The Bureau of Land Management is responsible for the stewardship of our public lands. It is committed to manage,

protect, and improve these lands in a manner to serve the needs of the American people for all times. Management

is based on the principles of multiple use and sustained yield of our nation's resources within a framework of

environmental responsibility and scientific technology. These resources include recreation; rangelands; timber;

minerals; watershed; fish and wildlife; wilderness; air; and scenic, scientific, and cultural values.

BLM/MT/PL-09/009+1610
#### § 22.1 Applicability of Rules [Rule 1].

The Government Accountability Office Contract Appeals Board is authorized to hear appeals from decisions of contracting officers with respect to any contract entered into by a legislative branch agency. These rules shall apply to all appeals filed with the Board on or after October 1, 2007.
NOTICE OF OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET ACTION 

 Date 11/06/2009 

Department of Health and Human Services 

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration 

FOR CERTIFYING OFFICIAL: Michael Carleton 

FOR CLEARANCE OFFICER: Seleda Perryman 

In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, OMB has taken action on your request 

received 08/10/2009. 

ACTION REQUESTED: Extension without change of a currently approved collection 

TYPE OF REVIEW REQUESTED: Regular 

ICR REFERENCE NUMBER: 200908-0930-001 

TITLE: Mandatory Guidelines for Federal Workplace Drug Testing Programs 

LIST OF INFORMATION COLLECTIONS: See next page 

OMB ACTION: Approved without change 

OMB CONTROL NUMBER: 0930-0158 

The agency is required to display the OMB Control Number and inform respondents of its 

legal significance in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.5(b). 

EXPIRATION DATE: 11/30/2011 DISCONTINUE DATE: 

BURDEN: RESPONSES HOURS COSTS 

Previous 28,384,168 1,788,809 2,090,000 

New 28,384,168 1,788,809 2,090,000 

Difference 

Change due to New Statute 0 0 0

 Change due to Agency Discretion 0 0 0

 Change due to Agency Adjustment 0 0 0

 Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA 0 0 0 

TERMS OF CLEARANCE: Prior to the next approval of this package, the Agency shall 

provide a progress update on adoption of electronic forms in an effort to reduce burden. 

SAMHSA is encouraged to explore ways to convert the Federal Drug Testing Custody and 

Control Form (Federal CCF) into an electronic form. 

OMB Authorizing Official: Kevin F. Neyland 

 Deputy Administrator, 

 Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs 
List of ICs 

IC Title Form No. Form Name CFR Citation 

Mandatory Guidelines for Federal 

Workplace Drug Testing Programs 

Application Form Attachment D – 

Application Form
###### Editorial Note on Part 0

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 0 appear at 73 FR 73 FR 54947, Sept. 24, 2008.

#### § 0.93 Bureau of Justice Statistics.

The Bureau of Justice Statistics is headed by a Director appointed by the President. Under the general authority of the Attorney General and reporting through the Assistant Attorney General, Office of Justice Programs, the Director performs functions and administers programs, including provision of financial assistance, under 42 U.S.C. 3731-3734, to provide a variety of statistical services for the criminal justice community.
#### § 385.1116 Appeals (Rule 1116).

All actions under this subpart are taken by Staff, except with respect to requests for public information under part 388. Except as provided in Rule 1110 (review of initial adjustment decision) of this section, there are no appeals to the Commission from Staff action taken under this section.
#### § 705.11 Judicial review.

Action taken pursuant to section 602 of the Act is subject to judicial review as provided in section 603 of the Act.
§ 4.301 Notice to fish and wildlife agencies and estimation of fees prior to filing. ( a ) *Notice to agencies* — ( 1 ) *New dam or diversion license applicants.* During the initial stage or pre-filing agency consultation under § 4.38(b)(1), a prospective new dam or diversion license applicant must inform each fish and wildlife agency consulted in writing with a copy to the Commission whether it will seek PURPA benefits.
( 2 ) *Exemption applicants.* During the initial stage of pre-filing agency consultation under § 4.38(b)(1), a prospective exemption applicant must notify each fish and wildlife agency consulted that it will seek an exemption from licensing.
( b ) *Estimate of fees.* Within the comment period provided in § 4.38(c)(5), a fish and wildlife agency must provide a prospective section 30(c) applicant with a reasonable estimate of the total costs the agency anticipates it will incur to set mandatory terms and conditions for the proposed project. An agency may provide an applicant with an updated estimate as it deems necessary. If an agency believes that its most recent estimate will be exceeded by more than 25 percent, it must supply the prospective applicant or applicant with a new estimate and submit a copy to the Commission.
[Order 141, 12 FR 8485, Dec. 19, 1947, as amended by Order 756, 77 FR 4894, Feb. 1, 2012]
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  National Small Business Week 
-  Virtual Summit 

## Section navigation

-  SBA locations 
-  Open government 
-  SBA Newsroom 
-  Work for SBA 
-  Organization    -  SBA leadership 
  -  Contact SBA 
  -  SBA initiatives 
  -  Forms and documents 
  -  Performance 
  -  Observances      -  Celebrating 70 years of service to America's small businesses 
    -  Hispanic Heritage Month 
    -  LGBTQ+ Pride Month 
    -  AANHPI Heritage Month 
    -  National Small Business Week 
    -  Women's History Month 
    -  Black History Month 
    -  National Veterans Small Business Week 
    -  Native American Heritage Month 
    -  National Women’s Small Business Month 
  -  Federal advisory committees 
-  Oversight and advocacy 
-  Information in other languages 

# Virtual summit

----

## Content

----

## About the event

The National Small Business Week 2-day virtual summit is happening Tuesday, April 30 – Wednesday, May 1, 2024.

This year’s event will include educational presentations by experts, exhibit booths, free business resources, multiple peer-to-peer networking rooms, and expert business advice from SCORE mentors. 

The event is free to attend for both established and aspiring business owners. However, you must first register to gain entry.

        Register for the virtual summit      

See the schedule of events below, or download a PDF version of the schedule.

## Tuesday, April 30

## Wednesday, May 1

## Networking rooms

Between sessions, make sure you check out our other rooms:
                  - Exhibit hall:  Chat with our cosponsors and pick up free resources for your business.
                  - Mentoring hall:  Get answers to your business questions from one of our experienced mentors.
                  - Networking lounge:  Make new connections with fellow aspiring entrepreneurs and small business owners.
                  - Inspiration hall:  View small business success stories and get inspired to achieve greatness.
No.

___________

In the

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

______________________________________

On Appeal from the 400th Judicial District Court of

Fort Bend County, Texas

, Cause Number 11

- DCR

- 59007A ; and the Opinion of the Fourte enth Court of Appeals

in Cause Number 14

- 14

- 00272

- CR , Delivered October 15 , 2015

______________________________________

JEREMY PATRICK SHAKESNIDER

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS

_____________________________________

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

PRO SE PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

______________________________

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF THE COURT OF CRIMINAL

APPEALS :

COMES NOW, Michael Elliott

, the undersigned attorney of record for

Jeremy Patrick Shakesnider

, the Appellant, herein, and files this Motion for

Extension of Time to File Pro Se Petition for Discretionary Review. As set out

below, the undersigned respectfully requests a thir ty

- day extension so that

Appellant can file his Pro Se Petition for Discretionary Review. In s uppor t of

said motion, the undersigned would show the Court the following:

1. Appell ant’s Petition for Discretionary Review is currently due in this

case on November 14 , 2015

. PD-1393-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS
Transmitted 10/27/2015 2:48:15 PM Accepted 10/27/2015 5:15:06 PM

ABEL ACOSTA
CLERK2. Appellant seeks an extension of thir ty days in which to file his

Petition for Discretionary Review , making his Petition due on or before December

14 , 2015

.

3. The undersigned counsel will not be representing Appellant after the filing of this motion. Appellant will now have to obtain and review the record in order to prepare and file a Pro Se Petition for Discretionary Review . The undersigned believes that there is insufficient time between now and November 15

, 2015 , to accomplish those goals. Consequently, the undersigned respectfully requests that the Court grant Appellant the additional time.

4

. The undersigned has not filed any previous motions for extension of

time in this case.

5

. For the reasons set forth above, the undersigned respectfully requests that Appellant b e granted an extension of thir ty days so that his brief in this case

will now be due on December 15 , 2015

.

PRAYER

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the undersigned

respectfully requests that this Court grant t his Motion for Extension of Time to File

Pro Se Petition for Discretionary Review

.

Respectfully submitted,

_______ /s/

__ Michael Elliott

______ Michael Elliott

State Bar Number 06546540

905 Front Street Richmond, Texas 77469 (832) 496

- 5000 (281) 232

- 8141 (fax) mike@elliottslaw.com2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the

foregoing Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time has been mailed to the Fort

Bend County District Attorney’s 30 1 Jackson Street, Richmond, Texas 77469 on

October 27 , 2015

.

__ /s/ Mike Elliott

___ _______________ Mike Elliott