alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 725.1 Authority.

This rule is being promulgated pursuant to the Water Resources Planning Act of 1965, section 402, Pub. L. 89-90, 79 Stat. 245 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-1). In addition, Executive Order 11988, *Floodplain Management,* at section 2(d); directs the preparation of procedures implementing its provisions, as does Executive Order 11990, *Protection of Wetlands,* at section 6. Each of these Orders was prepared in furtherance of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 *et seq.*). The floodplain management Order is also based on the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4001 *et seq.*), and the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1977, as amended (87 Stat. 975).
§ 367.1860 Account 186, Miscellaneous deferred debits. ( a ) This account must include all debits not provided for elsewhere, such as miscellaneous work in progress, and unusual or extraordinary expenses, not included in other accounts, that are in the process of amortization and items the proper final disposition of which is uncertain.
( b ) The records supporting the entries to this account must be kept so that the service company can furnish full information as to each deferred debit included in this account.
No. 98-50402 -1-

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-50402 Summary Calendar

WILLIAM WALLACE CAMPBELL,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus
PRICILLA MILES, Chief Classification Officer; GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; S.O. WOODS Classifications, Director of State Classification and Records Bureau,

Defendants-Appellants.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-97-CV-692

- - - - - - - - - - December 23, 1998

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Patricia Miles, S. O. Woods, and Gary Johnson appeal the

magistrate judge’s order denying their motion for summary judgment

asserting the defense of qualified immuni ty to William Wallace

Campbell’s civil-rights action alleging that the defendants failed

to protect him from assault by other inmates.

Bec ause the summary judgment evidence shows that there is no

genuine issue with respect to the extent of Johnson’s personalNo. 98-50402 -2-

involvement in the alleged constitutional deprivation and because

those actions were not unreasonable, the magistrate judge’s order

i s reversed as to Johnson. S ee Farmer v. Brennan , 511 U.S. 825,

837, 847 (1994); N eals v. Norwood , 59 F.3d 530, 533 (5th Cir.

1995).

As to Miles and Woods, however, the magistrate judge correctly

concluded that there were genuine issues of material fact with

respect to the extent of their knowledge of the risk of harm faced

by Campbell. For that reason, the denial of summary judgment as to

Miles and Woods is not an appealable interlocutory order and that

portion of the appeal must be DIS MISSED. S ee Lampkin v. City of

Nacogdoches
, 7 F.3d 430, 431 (5th Cir. 1993); see Johnson v. Jones ,
515 U.S. 304, 315-316 (1995).

REVERSED IN PART; APPEAL DISMISSED IN PART.
#### § 13.1 Purpose.

This part implements the responsibility given to the Attorney General under the Atomic Weapons and Special Nuclear Materials Rewards Act, 50 U.S.C. 47a-47f, for determining what persons are entitled to a reward for furnishing certain original information to the United States pertaining to atomic weapons and special nuclear material.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 03-3644

___________

Joseph Dixon, *

*

Appellant, *

* 

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the District

City of Minneapolis Water * of Minnesota.

Department; Minneapolis Community *

Development Agency; Hennepin * [UNPUBLISHED]

County Economic Assistance Ramar *

Building; Minneapolis City Attorney’s *

Office, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: July 6, 2004

Filed: July 9, 2004

___________

Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Dixon sued the City of Minneapolis Water Department and other local

entities, asserting claims about the discriminatory delivery of water and sewer
*

The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District

of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Arthur J.

Boylan, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota. 

-2-

services, economic assistance, and police protection. The district court*

 granted

summary judgment in favor of defendants, and Dixon appeals. 

Having carefully reviewed the record, we find Dixon’s conclusory allegations

of discrimination and other misconduct by defendants insufficient to avoid summary

judgment in the face of defendants’ evidence. See Krenik v. County of Le Sueur, 47

F.3d 953, 957 (8th Cir. 1995). Further, Dixon’s claims either were or could have

been brought in his earlier state court actions, and thus are barred by res judicata.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Dixon’s pending motion.

______________________________
### §8717. Study and report by the Department of Commerce

Not later than 3 years after October 5, 2018, the Secretary shall prepare a study and submit to Congress a report examining the appropriateness and effectiveness of applying the commodity check-off program model (such as those programs established under the Commodity Promotion, Research, and Information Act of 1996 (7 U.S.C. 7411 et seq.)) to a nonagricultural industry, taking into account the program established by this chapter and any other check-off program involving a nonagricultural industry.

(Pub. L. 115–254, div. E, §1318, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3485.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Commodity Promotion, Research, and Information Act of 1996, referred to in text, is subtitle B of title V of Pub. L. 104–127, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1032, which is classified generally to subchapter II (§7411 et seq.) of chapter 101 of Title 7, Agriculture. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 7401 of Title 7 and Tables.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

August 1, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 133223 & (43) Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan BORGESS MEDICAL CENTER, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 133223 COA: 270773 Allegan CC: 04-036235-NF JUAN RESTO, Defendant,

and

SOUTHERN MICHIGAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

By order of October 3, 20 07, the application for leave to appeal the January 9, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in ab eyance pending the decision in Ross v Auto Club Group (Docket No. 130917). On order of the Court, the case having been decided on May 7, 2008, 481 Mich 1 (2008), the application is again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G )(1), in lieu of granting leav e to appeal, we VACATE the majority opinion in Borgess Medical Center v Resto , 273 Mich App 558 (2007), and AFFIRM the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the reasons stated in the concurring opinion. The motion for leave to file brie f amicus curiae by Ph u Tran et al. is GRANTED.

p0729 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

August 1, 2008

Clerk
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT




       We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
No. 2-92428 on Form S-8, Post Effective Amendment No. 7 to Registration
Statement No. 2-59290 on Form S-8 and Post Effective Amendment No. 3 to
Registration Statement No. 2-73205 on Form S-8 of our report dated August 19,
2002, (which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory
paragraph relating to the restatement described in Note 2, the classification
error described in notes 9 and 13 and revisions of certain disclosures),
appearing in the Fiscal 2001 Annual Report to Stockholders and incorporated by
reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of The Great Atlantic & Pacific
Tea Company, Inc. for the year ended February 23, 2002.



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
-------------------------

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Parsippany, New Jersey
August 22, 2002
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  SBA Leadership 
-  Andrea Deadwyler 

#   Andrea Deadwyler

Assistant Inspector General for Audits

Office of Inspector General

            Download high-resolution image          

Andrea Deadwyler is the Assistant Inspector General for Audits at the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA), Office of Inspector General (OIG).  Mrs. Deadwyler has more than 30 years of government experience, 19 of those years in the Inspector General community.  Mrs. Deadwyler joined the SBA OIG in 2014 as the Director of the Credit Programs Group, responsible for directing audits of the Credit and Disaster Loan Programs.  Prior to joining SBA, Mrs. Deadwyler was an Audit Director for the U.S. Postal Service OIG, conducting and directing a wide range of audits of Postal Service Programs and Operations, including Human Resources, Security, Emergency Preparedness, and Environmental Sustainability. Before beginning her career in auditing, Mrs. Deadwyler spent a short time working as a Business Opportunity Specialist with SBA, and several years as a contracting officer for the U.S. Department of Agriculture. 

Mrs. Deadwyler is a native of Washington, DC and holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in Business Administration (Banking and Finance) and a Master’s degree in Public Administration from Bowie State University.
|                                                      |   | For      the quarters endedApril      30, |    |   | For      the years endedApril      30, |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------|---------|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
| In      thousands                                         |   | 2008                                      |    |   | 2007                                   |   |   | 2008 |   |   | 2007 |   |
| Orders      received:                                     |   |                                      |    |   |                                   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|    Sign      Making and Specialty Graphics |   | $                                         | 99,830  |   |                                   | $      | 82,494 |   |   | $ | 361,072 |   |   | $ | 300,946 |   |
|    Apparel      and Flexible Materials     |   |                                      | 54,518  |   |                                   |   | 55,961 |   |   |   | 208,183 |   |   |   | 198,846 |   |
|    Ophthalmic      Lens Processing         |   |                                      | 18,172  |   |                                   |   | 22,104 |   |   |   | 69,826 |   |   |   | 78,790 |   |
|                                                      |   | $                                         | 172,520 |   |                                   | $      | 160,559 |   |   | $ | 639,081 |   |   | $ | 578,582 |   |

|  In      thousands                                   |   | April      30,2008 |   |   | April      30,2007 |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------|--------|--------|--------------------|--------|
| Backlog:                                                  |   |               |   |   |               |   |
|    Sign      Making and Specialty Graphics |   | $                  | 3,462  |   |               | $      | 1,557 |   |
|    Apparel      and Flexible Materials     |   |               | 43,435 |   |               |   | 43,197 |   |
|    Ophthalmic      Lens Processing         |   |               | 1,440  |   |               |   | 2,600 |   |
|                                                      |   | $                  | 48,337 |   |               | $      | 47,354 |   |
Mantente sano.

Lávate las manos.

están por todos lados.

Los

www.cdc.gov/handwashing/esp CS294906-F
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 50 (Tuesday, March 15, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 13991]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5907]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Meeting of the Department of Defense Wage Committee

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice of closed meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of section 10 of Public Law 92-463, 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice is hereby given that closed 
meetings of the Department of Defense Wage Committee.

DATES: Tuesday, April 5, 2011, and Tuesday, April 19, 2011, at 10 a.m.

ADDRESSES: 1400 Key Boulevard, Level A, Room A101, Rosslyn, Virginia 
22209.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chairman, Department of Defense Wage 
Committee, 4000 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the provisions of section 10(d) of 
Public Law 92-463, the Department of Defense has determined that the 
meetings meet the criteria to close meetings to the public because the 
matters to be considered are related to internal rules and practices of 
the Department of Defense and the detailed wage data to be considered 
were obtained from officials of private establishments with a guarantee 
that the data will be held in confidence.
    However, members of the public who may wish to do so are invited to 
submit material in writing to the chairman concerning matters believed 
to be deserving of the Committee's attention.
    Additional information concerning the meetings may be obtained by 
writing to the Chairman, Department of Defense Wage Committee, 4000 
Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000.

    Dated: March 8, 2011.
Morgan F. Park,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2011-5907 Filed 3-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
### §1633. Exemption for State-regulated transactions

The Bureau shall by regulation exempt from the requirements of this part any class of credit transactions within any State if it determines that under the law of that State that class of transactions is subject to requirements substantially similar to those imposed under this part, and that there is adequate provision for enforcement.

(Pub. L. 90–321, title I, §123, May 29, 1968, 82 Stat. 152; Pub. L. 111–203, title X, §1100A(2), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 2107.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2010—Pub. L. 111–203 substituted "Bureau" for "Board".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2010 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 111–203 effective on the designated transfer date, see section 1100H of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as a note under section 552a of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
05/19/201 1 09:3 3 FA X 202493514 2 05/1S/201 1 11:1 3 1202457779 9 FA A * DM S WICKS-FA

X @1002/00 3 PAG E 02/0 3

UNITE D STATE S DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N FEDERA LAVIATIO NADMINISTRATIO N I nth e Matte r

of: FEDERA LEXPRES S CORPORATIO N FA A Docke t Nu . CPlONMOOl l FA A Cas e No . 2008NM70012 7 DM S No . FAA-2010-097 7 Judge : Richar dC

- Goodwi n Th e Honorabl e RicfaardC Goodwin : NOTIC EO FAPFKARAISC E ;!:_• ; 1'= ^

- < r , > ;^;---^. ' :: J ' ' J'-. " --'~' 

## ^o g rn-^-ir n _rj-^. ^ .la--:
. 1—

H 

## go o f- O Pleas e ente r

th e appearanc e o f

Glen nP . Wick s sin

dRoncevert

D . Almon da s attorney s o f recor dfor Federa l Expres s Corporation , Responden t i nth e above-reference daction
. Servic e o f all paper s b y T.T.S. Mail , evpedite dcourie r service , an dpersonal delivery shoul db e addresse da s follows : Glen n P . Wicks Roxiccvci i D . Almon d Th e Wicks Group , PLL C 121 5 17 * Street , N W Sumner Annex , FourthFloo r Washinfrton , D C 2003 6 Tel : (202 ) 457-779 0 Fax : (202 ) 457-779 9 Date dtlu s 18" * da

y o f May , 2011 . qi^ttrtirWick s Roncever t D . Almon d Th e Wick s Group , PLL C 121 5 17 * Street , N W Sumne r Annex , FourthFloo r Washington , D C 2003 6 Te) ; (202)457-779 0 Fax:(202)457-779 9 Counse l for

Responden t05/19/201 1 09:3 3 FA X 05/ie/2B H 11:1 3 202493514 2 1202457779 9 FA A * DM S

WICKS-FA X 21003/00 3 PAG E 03/0 3

CERTIFICAT EO FSERVIC E 1 hereb y certif

y tha t th e foregoin g documen t

ha s bee nsen t

viafacsimil e an dexpedite d courie r servic e to : Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 60 0 Independenc e Avenue , S W Wilbu r Wright Building—Suit e 2WIO0O Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention ; Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Fax:(202)493.514 2 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwi n Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , R mE l 2-32 0 Washington , D.C . 2059 0 Tel : (202 ) 366-213 9 Fax ; (202 ) 366-753 6 Mr . Kyl e Lomazow , Attorne y Mr . Scot t Morris , Attorne y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n Offic e o f th e Regiona l Counse l (ANM-7 ) 160 1 Lin dAve. , S.W . Renton , WA 9805 7 Tel : (425 ) 227-184 7 Fax ; (425 ) 227-100 7 On e (1 ) cop y an doriginal

On e (1 ) cop y

On e (I ) cop y

Date dthi s 18' " da

y of May , 2011 .
RpBC^erft) , Almon d l e Wick s Group , PLL C 121 5 17'^ Street , N W Stminer Annex , Fourt

hFloo r Washington , D C 2003 6 Tel : (202 ) 45 7 779 0 Fax : (202 ) 457-779 9 Coiinijft J for Responden t
#### In the Matter of Hulon Capshaw, an Attorney, Respondent. Association of the Bar of the City of New York, Petitioner.

First Department,

June 22, 1943.

*8. C. Lewis*of counsel *(Linar Ghrystie,*attorney), for petitioner.

*Thomas I. Sheridan*of counsel *(Hartman, Sheridan & Tekulsky,*attorneys), for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The respondent herein was removed from the office of City Magistrate of the City of New York upon evidence which this court found established that he had, in discharging certain defendants arraigned before him for illegally possessing policy slips, acted in violation of the duties imposed upon him by law. This court also found that in testifying as a witness at the trial of the case of *People*v. *Hines*(258 App. Div. 466) respondent herein attempted to obstruct the administration of justice by deceiving and misleading the jury as to the evidence *346presented and the law which should have been applied in the aforesaid prosecutions involving the possession of policy slips and as to the real reasons for discharging the defendants in each of those actions. The facts involved are stated in detail in the opinion of this court in *Matter of Capshaw*(258 App. Div. 470).

The petitioner, on the same facts, has charged the respondent with professional misconduct as an attorney at law. In support of the charges, it submitted to the referee to whom the matter was sent for hearings the same evidence which had been submitted in the proceedings instituted for the respondent’s removal as a City Magistrate. The respondent offered no evidence beyond his own explanation of his conduct and testimony as to his character.

The referee has reported that the charges are fully sustained by the evidence. This, in our judgment, is the only conclusion that could reasonably have been reached.

The respondent should be disbarred.

TJntermyer, J.

(concurring in result). A majority of this court having previously concurred in the opinion of Presiding Justice Martin in *Matter of Capshaw*(258 App. Div. 470) I am constrained on the authority of that decision to vote for the disbarment of the respondent.

Dore, J.

(dissenting in part). I think the removal proceeding is not determinative but the evidence in this disciplinary proceeding must be considered. In view of the condign and severe punishment this man has already received and considering, too, the unusual number and exceptional quality of his character witnesses testifying after removal, I vote to censure rather than to disbar.

Martin, P. J., and Townley, J., concur in *Per Curiam*opinion; TJntermyer, J., concurs in result, in memorandum; Dore,’ J., dissents in part and .votes to censure, in memorandum; Glen-non, J., taking no part.

Respondent disbarred.
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE U.S.
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with
the Annual Report of TELEFÓNICA DE ARGENTINA S.A. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Juan Ignacio López Basavilbaso, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (i) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|   
|---
|By:
|   



April 15, 2003
EXHIBIT 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in (i) the
prospectus constituting part of the Company's Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 33-32088, 33-40961 and
33-63326), respectively, for the Global Marine Inc. 1989 Stock
Option and Incentive Plan and the Global Marine 1998 Stock Option
and Incentive Plan, (ii) the prospectus constituting part of the
Company's Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Registration Nos.
333-80383, 333-40244, 33-32088, 33-40961, and 33-63326) for the
Global Marine 1998 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, (iii) the
prospectus constituting part of the Company's Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-40266) for the Global
Marine Savings Incentive Plan, (iv) the prospectus constituting
part of the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8
(Registration No. 33-40961) for the Global Marine Inc. 1990 Non-
Employee Director Stock Option Plan, (v) the prospectus
constituting part of the Company's Registration Statement on Form
S-8 (Registration No. 33-57691) for the Global Marine Inc. 1994
Non-Employee Stock Option and Incentive Plan, (vi) the prospectus
constituting part of the Company's Registration Statement on Form
S-8 (Registration No. 333-40244) for the Global Marine Non-
Employee Director Restricted Stock Plan, (vii) the combined
prospectus constituting part of the Company's Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (Registration Nos. 33-58577 and 333-49807)
for the proposed offering of up to $500,000,000 of debt
securities, preferred stock and/or common stock, and (viii) the
prospectus constituting part of the Company's Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-45908) for the resale
of up to $600,000,000 principal amount at maturity of Zero Coupon
Convertible Debentures due June 23, 2020 and shares of common
stock of the Company issuable upon conversion thereof, of our
report dated February 16, 2001, relating to the financial
statements, which appears in this Form 10-K. We also consent to
the incorporation by reference of our report dated February 16,
2001, relating to the financial statement schedule which appears
in this Form 10-K.





Houston, Texas
March 7, 2001