C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Robert Thomas Wilharm v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 15

- 00507

- CR

Trial court case number: 1402605

Trial court: 174th District Court of Harris County

Appellant’s appointed counsel, Joe David Wells , has not filed a brief on appellant’s

behalf in the above

- referenced appeal. Appellant’s brief was originally due on August 6, 2015.

On August 28 , 2015, the Court granted appellant’s first motion for extension of time to file a brief, ordering that appellant’s brief be filed by September 28 , 2015. On October 15 , 201 5 , the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that a brief had not yet been filed and required a response within 10 days. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(b)(2). No response was received.

Pursuant to Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8, we must abate this appeal and remand the case to the trial court for a hearing. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(b)(2)

– (3). We direct the trial court to conduct a hearing at which a representative of the Harris County District Attorney’s Office, Counsel Martin, and appellant shall be present. 1 The trial court shall have a court reporter record the hearing. The trial court is directed to make appropriate findings on these iss ues:

(1) whether appellant wishes to prosecute the appeal; and, if so,

(2) whether Counsel Wells has abandoned the appeal by failing to timely file a brief on appellant’s behalf;

(3) and, if so, whether appellant is presently

(a) indigent, in which case the trial court should appoint new appellate counsel at no expense to appellant and establish a date by which counsel will file a brief, no later than 30 days from the appointment; or

1 I f appellant is incarcerated, at the trial court’s discretion, appellant may participate in the hearing by closed

- circuit video teleconferencing . Any such teleconference must use a closed

- circuit video teleconferencing system that provides for a simultaneous compressed full motion video and interactive communication of image and sound between the trial court, appellant, and any attorneys representing the State or appellant. On request of appellant, appellant and his counsel shall be able to communicate privately without being recorded or hea rd by the trial court or the attorney representing the State.(b) not indigent, in which case the trial court should establish a date by which appellant shall retain new counsel;

(4) or, if Counsel Wells has not abandoned the appeal, make appropriate findings and recommendations regarding the reason that Counsel has failed to file a brief and establish a date by which Counsel will file appellant’s brief, no later than 30 days from the date of the hearing.

T EX

. C ODE C RIM

. P ROC

. A NN

. arts. 1.051(d), 26.04; T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.8(b)(2), (3), (4).

The trial court shall cause a supplemental clerk’s record containing its findings and
recommendations, including the name, address, telephone number, and State Bar n umber of any substitute counsel, and the reporter’s record of the hearing to be filed in this Court no later than December 22, 2015

. If the hearing is conducted by video teleconference, a certified video recording of the hearing shall be filed in this Cou rt no later than December 22, 2015

.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when a supplemental clerk’s record that complies with this order, and the reporter’s record of the hearing, have been filed in

this Court. The trial court coordinator shall set a hearing date and notify the parties and the

Clerk of this Court of such date

.

It is so ORDERED

.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: December 1, 2015