alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit




FOURTH AMENDMENT TO  
MANAGEMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Fourth Amendment to Management Services Agreement (this “Amendment”), effective as of March 9, 2016, is between SPH Services, Inc. (“SPH Services”), a Delaware corporation having an office at 590 Madison Avenue, 32nd Floor, New York, New York 10022, and Steel Excel, Inc. (the “Company”), a Delaware corporation having an office at 1133 Westchester Avenue, Suite N222, White Plains, New York 10604.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the Company and SP Corporate Services LLC (“SP Corporate”), a Delaware limited liability company, are parties to that certain Amended and Restated Management Services Agreement, dated as of August 1, 2012, as further amended (the “Services Agreement”), whereby SP Corporate furnishes the Company and its subsidiaries with certain Services. 
WHEREAS, SP Corporate wishes to assign its rights and responsibilities under the Services Agreement to SPH Services, its parent company, and SPH Services wishes to assume such rights and responsibilities.
WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Services Agreement to have SPH Services furnish the Services to the Company.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:
1.Defined Terms.  Defined terms used but not defined in this Amendment are as defined in the Services Agreement.
1.    References to SP Corporate.  All references to “SP Corporate” in the Services Agreement shall be amended to refer to “SPH Services.”
2.    Confirmation of Agreement.  All other terms of the Services Agreement shall remain in full force and effect
3.    Counterparts.  This Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
[Signature Page Follows]
The parties have duly executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.
	
				
	 
	SPH SERVICES, INC.

	 
	 

	 
	 

	 
	By:
	/s/ James F. McCabe Jr.

	 
	 
	Name:
	James F. McCabe Jr.

	 
	 
	Title:
	Chief Financial Officer






	
				
	 
	STEEL EXCEL INC.

	 
	 

	 
	 

	 
	By:
	/s/ James F. McCabe Jr.

	 
	 
	Name:
	James F. McCabe Jr.

	 
	 
	Title:
	Chief Financial Officer









1
3587477-1
#### THE PEOPLE OF THE TERRITORY OF GUAM, Appellee v. EUGENIO A. BENAVENTE and JUAN R. BABAUTA, Appellants

Criminal No. 40-A

District Court of Guam Appellate Division

December 15, 1967

*Counsel for Appellee:*'Island Attorney and Deputy Island Attorney

*Counsel for Appellants:*Arriola, Bohn *&*Dierking

Before SHRIVER, *Judge,*District Court of Guam; PEREZ, *Chief Judge,*Island Court of Guam

PER CURIAM

OPINION

The appellants, Eugenio A. Benavente and Juan R. Babauta, hereinafter the defendants, were convicted in *181the Island Court of petty theft. The defendants allege that they were prejudiced by the failure to file an information within a reasonable time and that an alleged confession was received when the defendant had not been warned of his right to remain silent. We are unable to pass on the evidence as a whole because the transcript of testimony ordered by the defendants was limited to the cross-examination of the defendant, Babauta, and the testimony of the arresting officer.

Insofar as we are advised, a full transcript would have shown the guilt of the defendants, independent of any alleged confession. The evidence available to us shows that the arresting officer was engaged in patrolling an area by automobile when his attention was directed to the defendants in the early morning hours. When he made inquiry he was told that the defendants were waiting for girls. He noticed bicycles and made inquiry as to where the bicycles came from and was told that a bicycle outside the car had been seen by them earlier and they came back to pick it up. He then asked what the second bicycle was doing inside the car and they stated that they found that bicycle at the same spot. Benavente then asked whether the officer was going to report the matter, and when he inquired where Benavente had got the bicycle, Benavente pointed to the direction of an apartment building. At this point the officer called police headquarters to ask for a detective. Apparently, subsequent investigation, which is not before us, showed that a number of bicycles had been stolen.

Certainly, the police officer was justified in making inquiry as to why the defendants were apparently loitering in that area in the early hours of the morning. His initial inquiry as to the bicycles might or might not have elicited information that the bicycles were properly in their possession. We do not construe Benavente’s statement as being a confession ,to theft, and as pointed out above, we have no *182way of knowing whether the proof offered by the government was adequate, regardless of any statements made by Benavente.

The defendants were taken to police headquarters where they were booked and then released. They were brought to trial shortly after an information was filed and there is no indication of prejudice. Judgment of conviction is affirmed.

This case was heard on oral argument by two judges by agreement of the parties as a third judge is not immediately available and the defendants had elected to begin the service of their sentences.
uht-ex102_55.htm



Exhibit 10.2

 

 

December 10, 2015

 

Steve Filton 

Senior Vice President & CFO

UHS of Delaware, Inc.

367 South Gulph Road 

King of Prussia, PA 19406

 

 

Dear Steve;

 

The Board of Trustees of Universal Health Realty Income Trust, at today’s meeting, authorized the renewal of the current Advisory Agreement between Universal Health Realty Income Trust and UHS of Delaware, Inc. (“Agreement”) upon the same terms and conditions. 

 

This letter constitutes Universal Health Realty Income Trust’s offer to renew the Agreement, through December 31, 2016, upon the same terms and conditions.  Please acknowledge UHS of Delaware’s acceptance of this offer by signing in the space provided below and returning one copy of this letter to me.  Thank you.

 

 

Sincerely,

 

 

 

/s/ Cheryl K. Ramagano

Cheryl K. Ramagano

Vice President and Treasurer

 

Agreed and Accepted:

 

UHS OF DELAWARE, INC.

 

 

By: /s/ Steve Filton

Steve Filton

Senior Vice President and CFO

 

 

CC:Charles Boyle
# C_2011160EN.01001101.xml

| 28.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 160/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 160/11

---

Action brought on 3 March 2011 — European Commission v Czech Republic

(Case C-109/11)

2011/C 160/11

Language of the case: Czech

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: K. Walker and D. Triantafyllou, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendants: Czech Republic

Defendants:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, by authorising non-taxable persons to become members of a VAT group, the Czech Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 9 and 11 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax; (1) |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by authorising non-taxable persons to become members of a VAT group, the Czech Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 9 and 11 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax; (1)

1

| — | order the Czech Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Czech Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

According to Article 9(1) of Directive 2006/112/EC, ‘taxable person’ shall mean any person who, independently, carries out in any place any economic activity, whatever the purpose or results of that activity. Article 11 of that directive provides that, after consulting the advisory committee on value added tax (hereafter, the ‘VAT Committee’), each Member State may regard as a single taxable person any persons established in the territory of that Member State who, while legally independent, are closely bound to one another by financial, economic and organisational links.

In the opinion of the Commission, by permitting non-taxable persons to become members of VAT groups in accordance with Article 11 of Directive 2006/112/EC, the Czech Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 9 and 11 of Regulation 20é6/112/EC.

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.

1

---
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  SBA District Offices 
-  Wyoming 
-  Doing Business In The Wyoming District 

# Doing business in the Wyoming District

## Business requirements

SBA’s Business Guide lists the requirements needed to start, grow, and expand your business. Since laws and taxes vary by state, here’s what you need to do before starting your business in our area.

### Business name and registration

Register your business name with the county clerk where your business is located. If you are a corporation, you will also need to register with the Secretary of State.

### Business licensing and zoning

Licenses are typically administered by a variety of state and local departments. It is important to consider zoning regulations when choosing a site for your business. Contact the local business license office where you plan to locate your business.

### Taxes

Wyoming Taxpayer Assistance Centers100 E. B St.Casper, WY 82601Phone: 307-261-6390

Wyoming Department of Revenue122 W. 25th St., Suite E301Cheyenne, WY 82002Phone: 307-777-5200

### Health and safety

Wyoming Department of Workforce Services444 W. Collins Dr., Room 1100Casper, WY 82601Phone: 307-234-4591

Wyoming OSHA444 W. Collins Dr., Room 1100Casper, WY 82601Phone: 307-233-4690

## State small business profiles

Need information on the local business landscape? SBA's Office of Advocacy has the latest demographic and statistics on local small business economic activity.

##  Local assistance

          Find counselors        

## SBA lending in our area

-  Loan programs              Learn more about SBA's 7(a) loans, 504 loans, and microloans that you can use for your business.                  Find a loan 
-  Local lenders              Download a list of participating lenders in our area.                  Download lender list 
-  Lender Match              Describe your business needs and get matched with an SBA-backed lender in your area.                  Get matched with a lender 
-  Lending activity reports              View 7(a) and 504 lending activity reports from our district.                  View lending reports 

## Additional local resources

###         State and local governments      

                    -  State of Wyoming Website 
                    -  Department of Revenue 
                    -  Wyoming State Agencies 

###         Community organizations      

                    -  Wyoming Business Council 
                    -  Wyoming New Hire Reporting Center 

##           Download our guide to SBA resources        

Learn about the opportunities available for small businesses nationwide.

Download English version PDFDownload Spanish version PDF
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 18

- 00003

- CR

Christine RUSSELL

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 11

- 0695

- CR

Honorable William Old, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI

, JUSTICE CHAPA , AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED October 17, 2018.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 51 (Wednesday, March 16, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 14396]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6108]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than March 31, 2011.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Ralph C. Stayer and Shelly A. Stayer, and the RFS 2010 
Irrevocable Trust F/B/O Ralph C. Stayer, all of Naples, Florida; to 
acquire voting shares of Hometown Bancorp, Ltd., and thereby indirectly 
acquire control of Hometown Bank, both of Fond du Lac, Wisconsin.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Glenda Wilson, Community 
Affairs Officer) P.O. Box 442, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:
    1. The Greenwood Childrens' Trust, Brentwood, Tennessee, with Jane 
Allison Crewse, Brentwood, Tennessee; Ann Greenwood Watson, Owensboro, 
Kentucky; Helen Virginia Futvoye, Jackson, Mississippi; and William 
Lawton Greenwood, Columbia, South Carolina, as trustees; to retain 
control of First United, Inc., and thereby indirectly retain control of 
First National Bank of Muhlenberg County, Kentucky, both of Central 
City, Kentucky.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 11, 
2011.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2011-6108 Filed 3-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
§ 154.304 Format of statements, schedules, workpapers and supporting data. ( a ) All statements, schedules, and workpapers must be prepared in accordance with the Commission's Uniform System of Accounts.
( b ) The data in support of the proposed rate change must include the required particulars of book data, adjustments, and other computations and information on which the company relies, including a detailed narrative explanation placed at the beginning of the specific statement or schedule to which they apply, explaining each proposed adjustment to base period actual volumes and costs.
( c ) Book data included in statements and schedules required to be prepared or submitted as part of the filing must be reported in a separate column or columns. All adjustments to book data must also be reported in a separate column or columns so that book amounts, adjustments thereto, and adjusted amounts will be clearly disclosed. All adjustments must be supported by a narrative explanation placed at the beginning of the specific statement or schedule to which they apply.
( d ) Certain of the statements and schedules of § 154.313 are workpapers. Any data or summaries reflecting the books of account must be supported by accounting workpapers setting forth all necessary particulars from which an auditor may readily identify the book data included in the filing and verify that such data are in agreement with the company's books of account.
[Order 582, 60 FR 52996, Oct. 11, 1995, as amended by Order 582-A, 61 FR 9629, Mar. 11, 1996]
Administrator Lisa P. Jackson August 3, 2010

Environmental Protection Agency

USEPA Headquarters 

Ariel Rios Building 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W.

Mail Code: 1101A 

Washington, DC 20460

Dear Administrator Jackson:

As provided in the Toxic Substances Control Act (“TSCA”), Petitioners American Bird 

Conservancy, Association of Avian Veterinarians, Center for Biological Diversity, Public 

Employees for Environmental Responsibility, and Project Gutpile request that the EPA adopt 

regulations prohibiting the manufacture, processing, and distribution in commerce of lead shot, 

lead bullets, lead fishing sinkers, and other lead-containing fishing gear, pursuant to TSCA (15 

U.S.C. § 2605(a)(2)(A)(i)). Such regulations are needed to protect vulnerable wildlife species 

from the ongoing threat of lead poisoning, as well as to safeguard human health.

TSCA mandates that the EPA must regulate chemical substances where there is a “reasonable 

basis to conclude” that such substances “present an unreasonable risk of injury to health and or 

the environment” (15 U.S.C. § 2605(a)). TSCA authorizes the EPA to prohibit “the 

manufacturing, processing, or distribution in commerce” of a chemical substance for a 

particular use or uses (15 U.S.C. § 2605(a)(2)(A)(i)). The EPA has already declared that lead is a 

toxic substance, and has removed nearly all lead containing products from the market.

We present in the attached petition nearly 500 peer reviewed scientific articles documenting 

the toxic effects of lead on wildlife species and conclude that the lead components of bullets, 

shotgun pellets, fishing weights and lures pose an unreasonable risk of injury to human and 

wildlife health and to the environment. 

Ammunition and tackle manufacturers now market a wide variety of non-lead, non-toxic 

bullets, shotgun pellets, and fishing tackle that can replace lead projectiles and weights.

The EPA has long held that whenever a toxic substance customarily used in the manufacture of 

commercial products can be replaced by a nontoxic substitute, the precautionary principle 

dictates that articles made of the toxic substance should be removed from the market. All 

hunting and fishing gear containing lead could economically be replaced with non-toxic 

alternatives, thus making a strong argument for EPA-regulatory action.
2

The petitioners understand that EPA is specifically prohibited from regulating ammunition or 

firearms under TSCA, but that toxic components of ammunition can be regulated if non-toxic 

alternatives are commercially available. The petitioners have waited until non-toxic 

alternatives have become available to submit this petition in an effort to clearly indicate that 

this petition is not an attempt to regulate ammunition or firearms.

Sincerely,

Michael Fry, PhD

American Bird Conservancy

Washington DC.
### SUBCHAPTER CXVI—LAKE MEREDITH NATIONAL RECREATION AREA
# C_2011103EN.01001401.xml

| 2.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/14

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 6 January 2011 — Criminal Proceedings against Titus Alexander Jochen Donner

(Case C-5/11)

2011/C 103/24

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Titus Alexander Jochen Donner

Other party to the proceedings: Generalbundesanwalt beim Bundesgerichtshof

Other party to the proceedings:

Question referred

Question referred

Are Articles 34 and 36 TFEU governing the free movement of goods to be interpreted as precluding the criminal offence of aiding and abetting the prohibited distribution of copyright-protected works resulting from the application of national criminal law where, on a cross-border sale of a work that is copyright protected in Germany

| — | that work is taken to Germany from a Member State of the European Union and de facto power of disposal thereof is transferred in Germany, |
| --- | --- |

—

that work is taken to Germany from a Member State of the European Union and de facto power of disposal thereof is transferred in Germany,

de facto

| — | but the transfer of ownership took place in the other Member State in which copyright protection for the work did not exist or was unenforceable? |
| --- | --- |

—

but the transfer of ownership took place in the other Member State in which copyright protection for the work did not exist or was unenforceable?

---
1600 Sacramento Inn Way, Suite 232 ∙ Sacramento, CA 95821 ∙ Tel: (916) 463 - 0177 ∙ Fax: (916) 463 - 0190 www.calbcc.org May 18 , 2015 The Honorable Anthon y R. Foxx Secretary of Transportation US Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey

Avenue SE Washington, DC 20590 The Honorable John F. Kerry Secretary of State US Department of State 2201 C Street NW Washington, 20520 The Honorable Penn y Priztker Secretary of Commerce US Department of Commerce 1401 Constitution Avenue NW Washington, DC 20230 Dear Secretaries Kerry , Foxx and Pritzker: On behalf of the members and supporters of the Black California Chamber of Commerce, I am writing to express my

concern about the impact that government - subsidized expansion by state owned airlines of Qatar and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) will have on the 400,000 jobs that are directl y or indirectl y connected to commercial aviation in California. On an annual basis, the total economic contribution of commercial aviation to California’s econom y is over $60 billion a year, which represents close to 2 percent of the total industrial output in the state. Every dollar of economic activity generated at a California airport will more than double that amount across the California economy . The state - owned Gulf airlines

– Qatar Airway s, Etihad Airway s and Emirates Airline

– have collectively

received at least $42 billion dollars in government subsidies and other unfair benefits over the last ten ye ars. These subsidies has enabled the Gulf carriers to divert passengers from U.S. airlines, which will reduce the intro duction of new routes and could eliminate less profitable routes to smaller cities. Additionally , these subsidies have distorted capacit y leading to an unbalanced marketplace

– this will threaten thousands of high - paying American jobs. The California Blac k Chamber of Commerce is asking that the U.S. government open consultations with Qatar and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) in order to address this serious1600 Sacramento Inn Way, Suite 232 ∙ Sacramento, CA 95821 ∙ Tel: (916) 463 - 0177 ∙ Fax: (916) 463 - 0190 www.calbcc.org issue. We urge the U.S. government to immediately freeze the introduction of new passenger service b y the gulf carriers during these consultations. The state of California and our members can’t afford to be negatively impacted by

unfair airline competition with Gulf carriers. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Sincerel y,
Aubry Stone, President/CEO
### §9092. Pandemic relief for aviation workers

#### (a) Financial assistance for employee wages, salaries, and benefits

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, to preserve aviation jobs and compensate air carrier industry workers, the Secretary shall provide financial assistance that shall exclusively be used for the continuation of payment of employee wages, salaries, and benefits to—

(1) passenger air carriers, in an aggregate amount up to $15,000,000,000; and

(2) contractors, in an aggregate amount up to $1,000,000,000.

#### (b) Administrative expenses

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary may use funds made available under section 9072(b) of this title for costs and administrative expenses associated with providing financial assistance under this part.

(Pub. L. 116–260, div. N, title IV, §402, Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2053.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This part, referred to in subsec. (b), was in the original "this subtitle", meaning subtitle A (§§401–412) of title IV of div. N of Pub. L. 116–260, Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2052, which enacted this part and amended sections 9041, 9071, and 9074 of this title. For complete classification of subtitle A to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Economic Aid to Hard-Hit Small Businesses, Nonprofits, and Venues Act, and also as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, and not as part of the CARES Act which in part comprises this chapter.