alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 33.8 Requirements for filing applications. The applicant must submit the application or petition to the Secretary of the Commission in accordance with filing procedures posted on the Commission's Web site at *http://www.ferc.gov .* ( a ) If the applicant seeks to protect any portion of the application, or any attachment thereto, from public disclosure, the applicant must make its filing in accordance with the Commission's instructions for submission of privileged materials and Critical Energy Infrastructure Information in § 388.112 of this chapter.
( b ) If required, the applicant must submit information specified in paragraphs (b), (c), (d), (e) and (f) of § 33.3 or paragraphs (b), (c), (d) and (e) of § 33.4 on electronic recorded media (i.e., CD/DVD) in accordance with § 385.2011 of this chapter, along with a printed description and summary. The printed portion of the applicant's submission must include documentation for the electronic information, including all file names and a summary of the data contained in each file. Each column (or data item) in each separate data table or chart must be clearly labeled in accordance with the requirements of §§ 33.3 and 33.4. Any units of measurement associated with numeric entries must also be included.
[Order 769, 77 FR 65475, Oct. 29, 2012]
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Daniel R. Luis, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of GoAmerica, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: May 12, 2005

                                                     /s/ Daniel R. Luis
                                                     ------------------
                                                     Daniel R. Luis
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
#### William W. Deatherage *et al. v.*Joseph R. Roach.

*Practice—withdrawing papers from the files.*A paper in a cause, when filed with the clerk, is a file of the court, and should not be withdrawn without leave of the court. But where a declaration, after being filed, was withdrawn from the files by the plaintiff’s counsel, but restored to the file before the time for the defendant to plead had expired, and it not appearing that the defendant had any defense of any kind to the note sued on, or had sustained any injury: *Reid,*a judgment in favor of the plaintiff would not be reversed for the refusal of the court to continue the cause for this irregularity.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Morgan county; the Hon. Cyrus Eplbr, Judge, presiding.

This was an action of assumpsit, by Joseph R. Roach against William W. Deatherage and others, upon a promissory note.

Messrs. Morrison, Whitlock *&*Lippincott, for the appellants.

Mr. Justice Breese

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This was assumpsit in the Morgan circuit court, resulting in a judgment for the plaintiff.

The only point made on this appeal is, the refusal of the court to continue the cause on defendant’s motion and affidavit, alleging that the declaration was not filed ten days before the first day of the term to which the writ was returnable.

By the bill of exceptions, it appears the declaration bore the file mark of the clerk as of the day the summons issued, which was October 27, 1874, more than ten days before the first day of the term. But it was alleged by the defendants, and admitted by the plaintiff, that on filing the declaration the plaintiff had withdrawn it from the file and taken it to his office for safe-keeping, saying he would produce it whenever it was wanted. His counsel gave as a reason for thus withdrawing the declaration, that papers in a suit between the same parties, one of the defendants being the clerk of the *322court, had been lost, and he had been put to great trouble and delay in supplying the loss.

It is known to be a common practice, but loose and improper, for the clerks to permit papers to be withdrawn by counsel after they are filed, and we would not desire to encourage such a practice. A paper, when filed with the clerk, is a file of the court, and should not be withdrawn without leave of the court. In many cases much injury might result from such practice.

In this case, the declaration was filed in time, and restored to the files before the time for pleading had expired, and it nowhere appears, nor is it alleged by appellants, they had any defense of any kind to the note. Nothing of the kind was pretended. They do not allege, by this withdrawal they were prevented from pleading, or that any injury of any kind has resulted to them.

Under such circumstances, appellee having an unquestioned claim to the amount of the note and damages, and appellants not having been prevented of making any defense they might have had, by this irregular act of appellee’s counsel, we therefore affirm the judgment.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Mr. Justice Sheldon

dissents.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Funding Programs 
-  Loans 
-  COVID-19 Relief Options 
-  Cross-program Eligibility On SBA COVID-19 Relief Options 

## Section navigation

-  Loans    -  Make a payment to SBA 
  -  7(a) loans 
  -  504 loans 
  -  Microloans 
  -  Lender Match 
  -  COVID-19 relief options      -  Paycheck Protection Program 
    -  COVID-19 Economic Injury Disaster Loan 
    -  Shuttered Venue Operators Grant 
    -  Restaurant Revitalization Fund 
    -  COVID-19 recovery information in other languages 
    -  SBA debt relief 
    -  Cross-program eligibility 
    -  Reporting identity theft 
    -  Preventing fraud and identity theft 
-  Investment capital 
-  Disaster assistance 
-  Surety bonds 
-  Grants 

# Cross-program eligibility on SBA COVID-19 relief options
§ 4.105 Action on exemption applications. ( a ) *Exemption from provisions other than licensing.* An application for exemption of a small hydroelectric power project from provisions of Part I of the Act other than the licensing requirement will be processed and considered as part of the related application for license or amendment of license.
( b ) ( 1 ) *Consultation.* The Commission will circulate a notice of application for exemption from licensing to interested agencies and Indian tribes at the time the applicant is notified that the application is accepted for filing.
( 2 ) *Non-standard terms and conditions.* In approving any application for exemption from licensing, the Commission may prescribe terms or conditions in addition to those set forth in § 4.106 in order to: ( i ) Protect the quality or quantity of the related water supply;
( ii ) Otherwise protect life, health, or property;
( iii ) Avoid or mitigate adverse environmental impact; or
( iv ) Better conserve, develop, or utilize in the public interest the water resources of the region.
(Energy Security Act of 1980, Pub. L. 96-294, 94 Stat. 611; Federal Power Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 792-828c); Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (16 U.S.C. 2601-2645); and the Department of Energy Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 7101-7352); E.O. 12009, 3 CFR 142 (1978))
[Order 106, 45 FR 76123, Nov. 18, 1980, as amended by Order 202, 47 FR 4246, Jan. 29, 1982; Order 413, 50 FR 11688, Mar. 25, 1985; Order 533, 56 FR 23154, May 20, 1991]
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 842 

To improve the mapping of wireless broadband coverage. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 14, 2019 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself, Mrs. CAPITO, Mr. MANCHIN, and Mr. HOEVEN) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To improve the mapping of wireless broadband coverage. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Improving Broadband 

5 Mapping Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act— 

8 (1) the term ‘‘Commission’’ means the Federal 

9 Communications Commission; and 

10 (2) the term ‘‘coverage’’ means wireless 

11 broadband coverage. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 842 IS

1 SEC. 3. VERIFICATION OF WIRELESS BROADBAND COV2 ERAGE DATA. 

3 (a) RULEMAKING.—Not later than 1 year after the 

4 date of enactment of this Act, the Commission shall ini5 tiate a rulemaking to establish a process to use coverage 

6 data reported by consumers and State, local, and Tribal 

7 government entities to verify coverage data reported by 

8 wireless carriers. 

9 (b) CONSUMER DATA.—The Commission shall con10 sider including in the process established under subsection 

11 (a) a mechanism to incorporate coverage data obtained 

12 from consumers through— 

13 (1) the FCC Speed Test mobile application, in14 cluding any successor to that application; and 

15 (2) any application through which consumers 

16 report coverage data. 

17 (c) STATE, LOCAL, AND TRIBAL DATA.—The Com18 mission shall consider including in the process established 

19 under subsection (a) a mechanism for the Commission to 

20 incorporate coverage data obtained from State, local, or 

21 Tribal government entities that are primarily responsible 

22 for mapping or tracking coverage for a State, unit of local 

23 government, or Indian Tribe, as applicable. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•S 842 IS

1 SEC. 4. EVIDENTIARY PROCESS FOR FIXED AND MOBILE 

2 BROADBAND SERVICES. 

3 In addition to the consumer input contemplated 

4 under section 3 with respect to mobile wireless coverage 

5 data, the Commission shall consider other measures, in6 cluding, but not limited to, an evidence-based challenge 

7 process, to help in verifying coverage data reported by pro8 viders of both fixed and mobile broadband services. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE**

 

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officers of Corgenix Medical Corporation, a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify with respect to the Nine month Report of Corgenix Medical Corporation on Form 10-Q for the nine months ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities an Exchange Commission (the “10-Q Report”) that:

 

i.        the 10-Q Report fully complies with the guidance of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

ii.     the information contained in the 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of we.

 

Dated:    May 13, 2011

 

**This Certification is made solely for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.**

 

**A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to we and will be retained by we and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This written statement shall not be deemed to be “filed” as part of the nine month report on Form 10-Q that it accompanies.**

 
| /s/   Douglass T. Simpson                           |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| President   and Chief Executive Officer             |   |   |
|                                                |   |   |
| /s/   William H. Critchfield                        |   |   |
| Senior   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |   |

 

----
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  SBA District Offices 
-  St. Louis 
-  Doing Business In The St. Louis District 

# Doing business in the St. Louis District

## Business requirements

SBA’s Business Guide lists the requirements needed to start, grow, and expand your business. Since laws and taxes vary by state, here’s what you need to do before starting your business in our area.

### Business name and registration

Register your business name with the county clerk where your business is located. If you are a corporation, you will also need to register with the Secretary of State.

### Business licensing and zoning

Licenses are typically administered by a variety of state and local departments. It is important to consider zoning regulations when choosing a site for your business. Contact the local business license office where you plan to locate your business. You may not be permitted to conduct business out of your home or engage in industrial activity in a retail district.

### Taxes

Missouri IRS Tax Assistance Centers1222 Spruce St.St. Louis, MO 63103Phone: 573-334-1552

Missouri Department of Revenue Taxation Division301 W. High St., Room 102Jefferson City, MO 65101Phone: 573-751-5860

### Health and safety

Missouri Department of Labor3315 W. Truman Blvd., Room 205Jefferson City, MO 65109Phone: 573-751-3403

OSHA Offices in Missouri1222 Spruce St., Suite 9.104St. Louis, MO 63103Phone: 314-425-4249

## State small business profiles

Need information on the local business landscape? SBA's Office of Advocacy has the latest demographic and statistics on local small business economic activity.

##  Local assistance

          Find counselors        

## SBA lending in our area

-  Loan programs              Learn more about SBA's 7(a) loans, 504 loans, and microloans that you can use for your business.                  Find a loan 
-  Local lenders              Download a list of participating lenders in our area.                  Download lender list 
-  Lender Match              Describe your business needs and get matched with an SBA-backed lender in your area.                  Get matched with a lender 
-  Lending activity reports              View 7(a) and 504 lending activity reports from our district.                  View lending reports 

## Additional local resources

###         State and local governments      

                    -  State of Missouri Website 

###         Community organizations      

                    -  St. Louis Regional Chamber 

##           Download our guide to SBA resources        

Learn about the opportunities available for small businesses nationwide.

Download English version PDFDownload Spanish version PDF
#### Alice LEMMONS, Movant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Opposed.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Sept. 26, 1939.

Henry S. McGuire for movant.

Hubert Meredith, Attorney General, and Wm. F. Neill, Assistant Attorney General, opposed.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal denied; judgment affirmed.
###### Editorial Note on Part 0

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 0 appear at 73 FR 73 FR 54947, Sept. 24, 2008.

#### § 0.148 Certifying officers.

The Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Director of the Bureau of Prisons, the Commissioner of the Federal Prison Industries, Inc., the Commissioner of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, the Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration, the Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Justice Programs, the Director of the United States Marshals Service, and the Director of the Executive Office for United States Attorneys, as to their respective jurisdictions, and the Assistant Attorney General for Administration, as to all other organizational units of the Department are authorized to designate employees to certify vouchers.

[Order No. 1142-86, 51 FR 25049, July 10, 1986, as amended by Order No. 2650-2003, 68 FR 4928, Jan. 31, 2003]
§ 4.83 Cancellation and loss of priority. ( a ) The Commission may cancel a preliminary permit after notice and opportunity for hearing if the permittee fails to comply with the specific terms and conditions of the permit. The Commission may also cancel a permit for other good cause shown after notice and opportunity for hearing. Cancellation of a permit will result in loss of the permittee's priority of application for a license for the proposed project.
( b ) Failure of a permittee to file an acceptable application for a license before the permit expires will result in loss of the permittee's priority of application for a license for the proposed project.
[Order 413, 50 FR 11686, Mar. 25, 1985]
EXHIBIT 21.1

                    SUBSIDIARIES OF CANANDAIGUA BRANDS, INC.


         STATE OF INCORPORATION         SUBSIDIARY

                New York                Batavia Wine Cellars, Inc.
                New York                Canandaigua Wine Company, Inc.
                New York                Canandaigua Europe Limited
                New York                Roberts Trading Corp.
                Delaware                Barton Incorporated
                Delaware                Barton Brands, Ltd.
                Maryland                Barton Beers, Ltd.
                Connecticut             Barton Brands of California, Inc.
                Georgia                 Barton Brands of Georgia, Inc.
                New York                Barton Distillers Import Corp.
                Delaware                Barton Financial Corporation
                Wisconsin               Stevens Point Beverage Co.
                Illinois                Monarch Import Company
                Georgia                 The Viking Distillery, Inc.
#### § 16.32 Procedure to obtain an identification record.

The subject of an identification record may obtain a copy thereof by submitting a written request via the U.S. mails directly to the FBI, Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) Division, ATTN: SCU, Mod. D-2, 1000 Custer Hollow Road, Clarksburg, WV 26306. Such request must be accompanied by satisfactory proof of identity, which shall consist of name, date and place of birth and a set of rolled-inked fingerprint impressions placed upon fingerprint cards or forms commonly utilized for applicant or law enforcement purposes by law enforcement agencies.

[Order No. 1134-86, 51 FR 16677, May 6, 1986, as amended by Order No. 2258-99, 64 FR 52226, Sept. 28, 1999]
§ 41.10 Examination of accounts. ( a ) All Major and Nonmajor public utilities and licensees not classified as Class C or Class D prior to January 1, 1984 shall secure, for the year 1968 and each year thereafter until December 31, 1975, the services of an independent certified public accountant, or independent licensed public accountant, certified or licensed by a regulatory authority of a State or other political subdivision of the United States, to test compliance in all material respects of those schedules as are indicated in the General Instructions set out in the Annual Report, Form No. 1, with the Commission's applicable Uniform System of Accounts and published accounting releases. The Commission expects that identification of questionable matters by the independent accountant will facilitate their early resolution and that the independent accountant will seek advisory rulings by the Commission on such items. This examination shall be deemed supplementary to periodic Commission examinations of compliance.
( b ) Beginning January 1, 1976, and each year thereafter, only independent certified public accountants, or independent licensed public accountants who were licensed on or before December 31, 1970, will be authorized to conduct annual audits and to certify to compliance in all material respects, of those schedules as are indicated in the General Instructions set out in the Annual Report, Form No. 1, with the Commission's applicable Uniform System of Accounts, published accounting releases and all other regulatory matters.
[Order 462, 37 FR 26005, Dec. 7, 1972, as amended by Order 390, 49 FR 32505, Aug. 14, 1984]
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Document Search 
-  OIG Fiscal Year Congressional Budget Justification 

# OIG Fiscal Year Congressional Budget Justification

## About this document and download

This Congressional Budget Justification reflects the President's Budget request for the Office of Inspector General (OIG) for the most current Fiscal Year.  In fulfillment of the Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended, the OIG provides auditing, investigative, and other services to support and assist the SBA in achieving its statutory mission.

  Download  .pdf

**Effective**

**Owned by**

**Related Programs**    Related programs:  

##                 Variations of this document            

-         Version      2025 |               Effective:      March 11, 2024 |        File size: 1568KB |          Download      .pdf        for 2025 / March 11, 2024       
-         Version      2024 |               Effective:      March 13, 2023 |        File size: 1163KB |          Download      .pdf        for 2024 / March 13, 2023       
-         Version      2023 |               Effective:      March 28, 2022 |        File size: 892KB |          Download      .pdf        for 2023 / March 28, 2022       
-         Version      2022 |             File size: 966KB |          Download      .pdf        for 2022 /        
-         Version      2021 |             File size: 1301KB |          Download      .pdf        for 2021 /        
-         Version      2020 |             File size: 515KB |          Download      .pdf        for 2020 /        
-         Version      2019 |             File size: 787KB |          Download      .pdf        for 2019 /        
-         Version      2018 |             File size: 444KB |          Download      .pdf        for 2018 /        
-         Version      2017 |             File size: 508KB |          Download      .pdf        for 2017 /        
-         Version      2016 |             File size: 446KB |          Download      .pdf        for 2016 /