alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 0
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 0 appear at 73 FR 73 FR 54947, Sept. 24, 2008.

§ 0.24 General functions. The Office of Information Policy shall be headed by a Director appointed by the Attorney General. The Director shall report to the Associate Attorney General. The following functions are assigned to, and shall be conducted, handled, or supervised by the Director of the Office of Information Policy: ( a ) Exercising the power and performing the functions vested in the Attorney General under 5 U.S.C. 552(e).
( b ) Developing, coordinating, and implementing policy with regard to the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), including publishing guidance and other material related to FOIA matters;
( c ) Providing legal assistance and advice to government agencies and organizational components of the Department on questions regarding the interpretation and application of the FOIA;
( d ) Undertaking, arranging, or supporting training and informational programs concerning the FOIA for government agencies and the Department;
( e ) Responding to initial requests made under the FOIA and the Privacy Act for the Office of Information Policy, as well as for the following Leadership Offices: ( i ) Office of the Attorney General;
( ii ) Office of the Deputy Attorney General;
( iii ) Office of the Associate Attorney General;
( iv ) Office of Legal Policy;
( v ) Office of Legislative Affairs;
( vi ) Office of Public Affairs;
( vii ) Office of Intergovernmental and Public Liaison; and
( viii ) Any other Department component that the Attorney General assigns to the Office of Information Policy for responding to requests made to such component under the FOIA and the Privacy Act.
( f ) Acting on behalf of the Attorney General on FOIA and Privacy Act access administrative appeals for all components of the Department, except that a denial of a request by the Attorney General is the final action of the Department on that request;
( g ) Representing government agencies in civil litigation claims arising under the FOIA through and under the direction of the United States Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia and any such other districts as may be designated;
( h ) Providing staff support to the Department Review Committee, established by § 17.14 of this chapter; and
( i ) Encouraging all Federal agencies that intend to deny FOIA requests raising novel issues to consult with the Office of Information Policy to the extent practicable.
[Order No. 3085-2009, 74 FR 29129, June 19, 2009]
### §9703. Observations and modeling for total water prediction

#### (a) Partnerships

#### (1) In general

The Administrator shall establish partnerships with 1 or more institutions of higher education (as defined in section 1001 of title 20) to evaluate observations that would improve total water prediction.

#### (2) Priority observations

In establishing partnerships under paragraph (1), the Administrator shall prioritize partnerships to evaluate observations from uncrewed aerial systems.

#### (b) Maintained observations

If the Administrator determines that incorporating additional observations improves total water prediction, the Administrator shall, to the extent practicable, continue incorporating those observations.

#### (c) Modeling improvements

The Administrator shall advance geographic coverage, resolution, skill, and efficiency of coastal oceanographic modeling, including efforts that improve the coupling of and interoperability between hydrological models and coastal ocean models.

(Pub. L. 117–316, §4, Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4408.)
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 30 , 2017 

# Order

Clerk June 30 , 2017

154814 (60)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 154814

v COA: 327491

Wayne CC: 14

- 004600

- FH

DARRELL WILDER, a/k/a DARRELL JOHN

WILDER, a/k/a DARRELL J. WILDER

, Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice

, the motion of plaintiff

- appellee to extend the time

for filing its supplement brief to Augus t 4, 2017, is GRANTED. The same extension is

given to defendant

- appellant to file his supplemental brief.
### §1008. Notification of Secretary of the Interior of approval of assistance; surveys and investigations; report and recommendations; consideration; cost of surveys, investigations and reports

When the Secretary approves the furnishing of assistance to a local organization in preparing a plan for works of improvement as provided for in section 1003 of this title:

(1) The Secretary shall so notify the Secretary of the Interior in order that the latter, as he desires, may make surveys and investigations and prepare a report with recommendations concerning the conservation and development of wildlife resources and participate, under arrangements satisfactory to the Secretary of Agriculture, in the preparation of a plan for works of improvement that is acceptable to the local organization and the Secretary of Agriculture.

(2) Full consideration shall be given to the recommendations contained in any such report of the Secretary of the Interior as he may submit to the Secretary of Agriculture prior to the time the local organization and the Secretary of Agriculture have agreed on a plan for works of improvement. The plan shall include such of the technically and economically feasible works of improvement for wildlife purposes recommended in the report by the Secretary of the Interior as are acceptable to, and agreed to by, the local organization and the Secretary of Agriculture, and such report of the Secretary of the Interior shall, if requested by the Secretary of the Interior, accompany the plan for works of improvement when it is submitted to the Secretary of Agriculture for approval or transmitted to the Congress through the President.

(3) The cost of making surveys and investigations and of preparing reports concerning the conservation and development of wildlife resources shall be borne by the Secretary of the Interior out of funds appropriated to his Department.

(Aug. 4, 1954, ch. 656, §12, as added Pub. L. 85–624, §3, Aug. 12, 1958, 72 Stat. 567.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of certain enforcement functions of Secretary or other official in Department of Agriculture under this chapter to Federal Inspector, Office of Federal Inspector for Alaska Natural Gas Transportation System, and subsequent transfer to Secretary of Energy, then to Federal Coordinator for Alaska Natural Gas Transportation Projects, see note set out under section 1002 of this title.
#### § 390.1 Electronic registration.

Any person who wishes to engage in any of the activities listed in § 390.2 must register electronically through the Commission's web site, in compliance with instructions located on the Web site, at *http://www.ferc.gov.*

###### Effective Date Note

#### Effective Date Note:

At 68 FR 7416, Feb. 14, 2003, § 390.1 was suspended, effective Jan. 7, 2003.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ JOHN G. DUFFYJohn G. DuffyChief Executive Officer *
    
    The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as
a separate disclosure document.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 27, 2016

d0120 

# Order

Clerk January 27, 2016

151657

In re Estate of KEYES.

_________________________________________/

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH,

Appellee,

v SC: 151657

COA: 320420

Bay Probate Court:

ESTATE OF ESTHER KEYES, 13

- 049103

- CZ

Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 16, 2015

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
### §6206. Publication requirements applicable to antitrust mutual assistance agreements

#### (a) Publication of proposed antitrust mutual assistance agreements

Not less than 45 days before an antitrust mutual assistance agreement is entered into, the Attorney General, with the concurrence of the Commission, shall publish in the Federal Register—

(1) the proposed text of such agreement and any modification to such proposed text, and

(2) a request for public comment with respect to such text or such modification, as the case may be.

#### (b) Publication of proposed amendments to antitrust mutual assistance agreements in effect

Not less than 45 days before an agreement is entered into that makes an amendment to an antitrust mutual assistance agreement, the Attorney General, with the concurrence of the Commission, shall publish in the Federal Register—

(1) the proposed text of such amendment, and

(2) a request for public comment with respect to such amendment.

#### (c) Publication of antitrust mutual assistance agreements, amendments, and terminations

Not later than 45 days after an antitrust mutual assistance agreement is entered into or terminated, or an agreement that makes an amendment to an antitrust mutual assistance agreement is entered into, the Attorney General, with the concurrence of the Commission, shall publish in the Federal Register—

(1) the text of the antitrust mutual assistance agreement or amendment, or the terms of the termination, as the case may be, and

(2) in the case of an agreement that makes an amendment to an antitrust mutual assistance agreement, a notice containing—

(A) citations to the locations in the Federal Register at which the text of the antitrust mutual assistance agreement that is so amended, and of any previous amendments to such agreement, are published, and

(B) a description of the manner in which a copy of the antitrust mutual assistance agreement, as so amended, may be obtained from the Attorney General and the Commission.

#### (d) Condition for validity

An antitrust mutual assistance agreement, or an agreement that makes an amendment to an antitrust mutual assistance agreement, with respect to which publication does not occur in accordance with subsections (a), (b), and (c) shall not be considered to be in effect under this chapter.

(Pub. L. 103–438, §7, Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4600.)
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1324 Referred in House (RFH)]

  2d Session
                                S. 1324

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 27, 2000

                 Referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To expand the boundaries of the Gettysburg National Military Park to 
            include the Wills House, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GETTYSBURG NATIONAL MILITARY PARK BOUNDARY REVISION.

    (a) In General.--Section 1 of the Act entitled ``An Act to revise 
the boundary of the Gettysburg National Military Park in the 
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and for other purposes'' approved August 
17, 1990 (16 U.S.C. 430g-4) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c);
            (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following:
    ``(b) Additional Land.--In addition to the land identified in 
subsection (a), the park shall also include the property commonly known 
as the Wills House located in the Borough of Gettysburg and identified 
as Tract P02-1 on the map entitled `Gettysburg National Military Park' 
numbered MARO 305/80,011 Segment 2, and dated April 1981, revised May 
14, 1999.''; and
            (3) in subsection (c) (as redesignated by paragraph (1)), 
        by striking ``map referred to in subsection (a)'' and inserting 
        ``maps referred to in subsections (a) and (b)''.

SEC. 2. ACQUISITION AND DISPOSAL OF LAND.

    Section 2 of the Act entitled ``An Act to revise the boundary of 
the Gettysburg National Military Park in the Commonwealth of 
Pennsylvania, and for other purposes'' approved August 17, 1990 (16 
U.S.C. 430g-4) is amended by striking ``1(b)'' each place it appears 
and inserting ``1(c)''.

            Passed the Senate November 19, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                    GARY SISCO,

                                                             Secretary.
```
No. 19,996.

#### Mesa County Junior College District, et al., *v.*Robert Donner, Sr., et al.

(371 P. [2d] 442)

Decided May 14, 1962.

Mr. Perry E. Williams, Messrs. Phelps, Fonda *&*Hays, for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. Donald E. LaMora, for defendants in error Robert Donner, Sr., Herbert L. Rouse and Merrill E. Shoup.

Messrs. Tarter and Tarter, for defendant in error Board of County Commissioners of El Paso County.

*En Banc.*

Mr. Justice Pringle

delivered the opinion of the Court.

*157Defendants in error, Donner, Rouse and Shoup brought an action in the District Court of El Paso County against the defendant in error Board of County Commissioners of El Paso County under Rule 57, R.C.P. Colo. The suit sought to have House Bill No. 360, 1961 Colo. Session Laws 688 declared unconstitutional.

In effect, the act in question provides that when a resident of a county not within a Junior College District attends a junior college in this state, the county of such student’s residence should each year during his attendance levy and collect $500 for such student, which sum should be paid to a state fund which in turn would pay the same to the Junior College District wherein the junior college which the student attends is located.

The plaintiffs served a copy of the complaint and summons upon the defendant Board of County Commissioners and upon the Attorney General of the State of Colorado as required by Rule 57. The Junior College Districts were not joined as parties defendant in the original action, but within the 20 days permitted to answer the complaint filed a motion asking leave to intervene in the action, alleging in effect that they had an interest which would be affected by the declaration, namely, that if the act were declared to be unconstitutional and the relief sought were to be granted they would be deprived of the revenues provided for their benefit by House Bill No. 360. The parties seeking to intervene agreed to be ready for trial on the date set.

The court denied the petitioner’s motion to intervene and, after motion for new trial was denied, petitioners brought error here. We stayed further proceedings in the trial court until the question of intervention was determined.

Rule 57, under which this suit was begun, and C.R.S. ’53, 77-11-11, which is the Declaratory Judgments Act of the State of Colorado, provide that all persons who claim an interest in the litigation which would be affected by the declaration sought shall be made parties. *158Here the Junior College Districts were not made parties, although they had a direct interest in the litigation in that a declaration of unconstitutionality would result in the loss to them of the funds provided by the act in question. Under such circumstances the rule and the statute conferred upon the Districts a right to be parties to this proceeding and their petition to intervene should have been granted.

The case is reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court with directions to permit the intervention of the Junior College Districts and thereupon to proceed to final determination of the matter.

Mr. Justice Sutton not participating.
###### Editorial Note on Part 0

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 0 appear at 73 FR 73 FR 54947, Sept. 24, 2008.

#### § 0.151 Administering oath of office.

The Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Director of the Bureau of Prisons, the Commissioner of Federal Prison Industries, the Commissioner of Immigration and Naturalization, the Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration, the Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, the Director of the Office of Justice Assistance, Research and Statistics, the Director of the Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys, and the Director of the U.S. Marshals Service, as to their respective jurisdictions, and the Assistant Attorney General for Administration, as to all other organizational units of the Department are authorized to designate, in writing, pursuant to the provisions of sections 2903(b) and 2904 of title 5, U.S. Code, officers or employees to administer the oath of office required by section 3331 of title 5, U.S. Code, and to administer any other oath required by law in connection with employment in the executive branch of the Federal Government.

[Order No. 423-69, 34 FR 20388, Dec. 31, 1969, as amended by Order No. 516-73, 38 FR 12918, May 17, 1973; Order No. 520-73, 38 FR 18380, July 10, 1973; Order No. 772-78, 43 FR 14009, Apr. 4, 1978; Order No. 960-81, 46 FR 52351, Oct. 27, 1981; Order No. 2650-2003, 68 FR 4928, Jan. 31, 2003]
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT JESSICA SALEMAN, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D19-1967 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ________________________________ ) Opinion filed 

### September 25, 2020. Appeal from the Circuit Court for DeSoto County; Don T. Hall, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Clark E. Green, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. NORTHCUTT, 

### BLACK , and 

### SLEET , JJ., Concur.
### §9058b. Funding for water assistance program

#### (a) In general

In addition to amounts otherwise available, there is appropriated to the Secretary of Health and Human Services (in this section referred to as the "Secretary") for fiscal year 2021, out of any amounts in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, $500,000,000, to remain available until expended, for grants to States and Indian Tribes to assist low-income households, particularly those with the lowest incomes, that pay a high proportion of household income for drinking water and wastewater services, by providing funds to owners or operators of public water systems or treatment works to reduce arrearages of and rates charged to such households for such services.

#### (b) Allotment

The Secretary shall—

(1) allot amounts appropriated in this section to a State or Indian Tribe based on—

(A) the percentage of households in the State, or under the jurisdiction of the Indian Tribe, with income equal or less than 150 percent of the Federal poverty line; and

(B) the percentage of households in the State, or under the jurisdiction of the Indian Tribe, that spend more than 30 percent of monthly income on housing; and

(2) reserve up to 3 percent of the amount appropriated in this section for Indian Tribes and tribal organizations.

#### (c) Definition

In this section, the term "State" means each of the 50 States of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam, the United States Virgin Islands, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.

(Pub. L. 117–2, title II, §2912, Mar. 11, 2021, 135 Stat. 51.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, and not as part of the CARES Act which in part comprises this chapter.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL IMFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AUGUST TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION FOR THE SIX
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                      23,612,840
<SECURITIES>                                 7,425,652
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,078,117
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (90,045)
<INVENTORY>                                  5,604,892
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            43,241,330
<PP&E>                                       2,010,746
<DEPRECIATION>                               (421,842)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              45,929,001
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,208,121
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       125,905
<OTHER-SE>                                  39,526,727
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                45,929,001
<SALES>                                     12,199,578
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,199,578
<CGS>                                        4,978,804
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,978,804
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,105,526
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             100,132
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 79,504
<INCOME-TAX>                                    26,236
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             53,268
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    53,268
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01


</TABLE>
### §1830. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 91–540, §11, Dec. 9, 1970, 84 Stat. 1406; Pub. L. 94–360, §9, July 13, 1976, 90 Stat. 920; Pub. L. 104–66, title I, §1012(b), Dec. 21, 1995, 109 Stat. 711, which required the Secretary of Agriculture to include information on matters covered by this chapter, together with recommendations for legislative and other action, as part of the annual report submitted to Congress under section 2155 of title 7, terminated, effective May 15, 2000, pursuant to section 3003 of Pub. L. 104–66, as amended, set out as a note under section 1113 of Title 31, Money and Finance. See, also, page 44 of House Document No. 103–7.
### §80a–36. Larceny and embezzlement

Whoever steals, unlawfully abstracts, unlawfully and willfully converts to his own use or to the use of another, or embezzles any of the moneys, funds, securities, credits, property, or assets of any registered investment company shall be deemed guilty of a crime, and upon conviction thereof shall be subject to the penalties provided in section 80a–48 of this title. A judgment of conviction or acquittal on the merits under the laws of any State shall be a bar to any prosecution under this section for the same act or acts.

(Aug. 22, 1940, ch. 686, title I, §37, 54 Stat. 841.)