alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-11-00039-CR

JULIUS MORAN,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 19th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010-389-C1

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Julius Moran attempts to appeal from his conviction in January 2011. By letter 

dated June 3, 2011, the Clerk of this Court notified Moran that the appeal was subject to 

dismissal because it appeared that the trial court’s certificate of right of appeal indicated 

that Moran waived his right to appeal and had no right to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

26.2(a)(1); 25.2(d). The record contains a written waiver of appeal signed by Moran. 

The Clerk also warned Moran that the appeal would be dismissed unless, within 21 

days of the date of the letter, a response was filed showing grounds for continuing the 
Moran v. State Page 2

appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 44.3. We received a response from Moran; however, it does 

not provide grounds for continuing the appeal. Moran’s “Motion in Opposition to 

Dismissal” is denied.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.

AL SCOGGINS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed July 20, 2011

Do not publish 

[CRPM]
###### Editorial Note on Part 284

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 284 appear at 65 FR 10222, Feb. 25, 2000.

#### § 284.401 Definitions.

*Affiliated marketer.* For purposes of this subpart, an “affiliated marketer” is a person engaged in the “marketing” of natural gas that is an “affiliate” of an interstate pipeline as those terms are defined in § 161.2 of this chapter.

[Order 547, 57 FR 57959, Dec. 8, 1992]
19-Feb Continued to 7-Jan 2-Jan to 22-Jan 18-Jan to 20-Jan27-Feb 29-Jan to 30-Jan 6-Feb to 13-Feb10-Mar to 11-Mar 4-Feb 10-Mar20-Mar 7-Feb 17-Mar to 19-Mar22-May 18-Apr 31-Mar to 17-Apr2-Jun 29-Apr to 30-Apr 8-May to 22-May24-Jun 27-May 15-Jun to 16-Jun25-Jul 19-Jun 17-Jun1-Aug to 2-Aug 15-Jul to 16-Jul 18-Jun7-Aug to 13-Aug 18-Jul 23-Jun24-Aug 24-Aug to 25-Aug 26-Jun to 27-Jun10-Oct 14-Sep to 17-Sep 13-Jul13-Nov 23-Sep 5-Aug22-Dec to Continued 8-Oct 10-Sep22-Oct 29-Sep18-Nov to 19-Nov 31-Oct26-Nov to 9-Dec 23-Nov to 30-Nov16-Dec to 17-Dec 12-Dec2007 2008 2009 2010
ex10-1.htm


Exhibit 10.1



 


Westergaard Holdings Ltd.


 


12757 54th Avenue, Surrey, BC V3X 3C1 (604) 970-4992


 


December 31, 2015


 


Robert C. Silzer


DSG Global Inc.


5455 - 152 Street


Suite 214


Surrey, BC V3S 5A5


 


Dear Mr. Silzer:







RE: Westergaard Holdings Ltd. — Subscription Agreement/Debt Settlement & Addendums


 


As per your request, Westergaard Holdings Ltd. hereby extends redemption dates as set out in a Letter Agreement addressed to yourself and dated November 10, 2015 as follows:


 



	
1.  

	
I hereby agree to extend the December 15, 2015 redemption date to May 1, 2016.








	
2.  

	
I hereby agree to extend the January 15, 2016 redemption date to June 1, 2016.








	
3.  

	
I hereby agree to extend the February IS, 2016 redemption date to July 1, 2016.







 


I trust the extension of redemption dates as set out above will provide yourself and the company ample time to raise sufficient capital to redeem all of the Series A Convertible Preferred Shares owned by Westergaard Holdings Ltd. and to provide DSG Global Inc. with working capital as required to move forward.


 


Yours very truly,


 


Westergaard Holdings Ltd.












/s/ Keith Westergaard            


Keith B. Westergaard



























keith.westergaard@gmail.com
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 853 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 853

To amend the John S. McCain III, Daniel K. Akaka, and Samuel R. Johnson 
 VA Maintaining Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside 
 Networks Act of 2018 to eliminate the Asset and Infrastructure Review 
           Commission of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 25, 2019

Mr. Manchin (for himself and Mr. Rounds) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the John S. McCain III, Daniel K. Akaka, and Samuel R. Johnson 
 VA Maintaining Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside 
 Networks Act of 2018 to eliminate the Asset and Infrastructure Review 
           Commission of the Department of Veterans Affairs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF ASSET AND INFRASTRUCTURE REVIEW COMMISSION OF 
              DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS.

    Title II of the John S. McCain III, Daniel K. Akaka, and Samuel R. 
Johnson VA Maintaining Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated 
Outside Networks Act of 2018 (Public Law 115-182) is amended by 
striking subtitle A.
                                 <all>
```
U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1 

49–011 2015

114th Congress, 1st Session – – – – – – – – – – – – – Senate Document 114–2 

VETO—S. 1 

(PM 6) 

MESSAGE 

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 

RETURNING

WITHOUT MY APPROVAL S. 1, THE KEYSTONE XL PIPELINE 

APPROVAL ACT 

FEBRUARY 24, 2015.—Ordered to be printed 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARINGE:\Seals\Congress.#13

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING
(1) 

To the Senate of the United States: 

I am returning herewith without my approval S. 1, the ‘‘Keystone 

XL Pipeline Approval Act.’’ Through this bill, the United States 

Congress attempts to circumvent longstanding and proven processes for determining whether or not building and operating a 

cross-border pipeline serves the national interest. 

The Presidential power to veto legislation is one I take seriously. 

But I also take seriously my responsibility to the American people. 

And because this act of Congress conflicts with established executive branch procedures and cuts short thorough consideration of 

issues that could bear on our national interest—including our security, safety, and environment—it has earned my veto. 

BARACK OBAMA. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, February 24, 2015. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.31
  
   1.
    
    Severance Benefits. You shall be paid a total amount of
$225,000.00 less applicable statutory deductions and voluntary deductions. You
will be paid at the rate of your current annual base salary on the normal
payroll dates (semi-monthly) beginning with payroll period ending March 15, 2006
through the payroll period ending December 29, 2006. You will be paid the
balance of the $225,000.00 in the gross amount of $42,944.38 less applicable
statutory deductions and voluntary deductions on December 29, 2006.2.
    
    Medical, Dental, and Vision Benefits. You will have the customary
continuation rights under COBRA beginning March 16, 2006 which include the option
of continuing health coverage. Your COBRA rates will be supplemented by the
difference between COBRA rates at the time of coverage and active rates at the
time of coverage. A COBRA letter will be mailed to your home shortly after your
Termination Date.3.
    
    Stock Options. As of your Termination Date, you will be fully
vested in the following number of options at the applicable option price listed:
 Number of Shares
    
    
    14,000Grant Date
    
    
    July 5, 2004Vesting Date
    
    
    July 5, 2005Option Price
    
    
    $11.28
 These options must be exercised within twenty-one (21) days of your Termination
Date.4.
    
    Other Welfare Plan Benefits. You will be entitled to all other
employee benefit plans in which you currently participate through your
Termination Date and in accordance with plan documents. However, your coverage
under these benefit plans will end as your Termination Date. You will be
entitled to conversion rights of benefits as allowable by the plans.5.
    
    Vacation Pay Benefits. You will be entitled to all accrued,
unused vacation pay as of March 10, 2006.
  24




---



##### 



et seq., ; et seq.; et seq et seq.; et
seq.;
     Sincerely,DELTA APPAREL, INC.By:Robert W. HumphreysTitle:
    
    President & CEO
 ACKNOWLEDGMENT
  Date
    
    
    
    Herbert M. Mueller
 25
Deciding when or even if to become a

parent is one of the most important choices you

will make — for you, for your partner, and for your

future. Maybe you are having sex and don’t want

to have a baby right away. Maybe you want to

learn about how to space your children in the

future. Maybe you’re just curious about contraception. The point is, contraceptive methods help

you plan when you will become a parent. This

brochure tells you about one of the methods, so

you can choose the one — or two — that seem

right for you.

These choices matter to both men and

women. Although most contraceptive methods

are used by women, men are just as involved.

Contraception seems to work best when a man

and woman choose a method together and use it

together!

For additional copies, please contact:

Office of Population Affairs Clearinghouse

P.O. Box 30686, Bethesda, MD 20824 or

Phone: (301) 654-6190 Fax: (301) 215-7731

What you should know about:

 THE MALE CONDOM

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Office of Public Health and Science

Office of Population Affairs
What is it? A male condom is a latex, plastic, or “animal skin” sheath that

covers the penis. It may be prelubricated and/or contain a spermicide.

How does it work? The male condom creates a barrier between the

penis and the vagina. It collects and holds semen so that an egg and sperm do not meet

and fertilization does not occur.

How is it used? The condom is unrolled over the erect penis before sex.

The penis must be withdrawn from the vagina while it is still erect while the male holds

the base of the condom in place. The condom is then removed from the penis and

discarded without spilling the semen near the vagina. It cannot be reused.

How well does it work? A condom is 84% effective with typical use*

and 97% effective with perfect use.** A condom can be up to 99% effective if it contains spermicide.

Does it reduce the risk for HIV/AIDS and STDs?

Yes and no. A latex male condom reduces the risk for HIV/AIDS and most STDs. An “animal

skin” condom does not.

What are its main advantages? The condom has no health

risks or side effects (except possible allergy to the latex). The latex condom is the only

currently approved contraceptive method that effectively reduces the risk of contracting

or transmitting HIV/AIDS and STDs. It can be used with other contraceptive methods to

increase effectiveness and protect against infection. It does not require a prescription

and can be purchased at most drugstores. And it delays premature ejaculation.

What are some possible problems? A condom can slip off

or break, causing leakage. Using a condom correctly can inhibit spontaneity and reduce

sexual sensations. A latex condom can cause irritation, discomfort, and severe allergic

reactions (in which case a plastic condom can be used). A latex condom should not

be used with an oil-based lubricant.

* Typical Use Effectiveness—How well the method works for the average person.

** Perfect Use Effectiveness—How well the method works when used correctly all of the time.
### §720m. Sense of Congress concerning Alaskan ownership

It is the sense of Congress that—

(1) Alaska Native Regional Corporations, companies owned and operated by Alaskans, and individual Alaskans should have the opportunity to own shares of the Alaska natural gas pipeline in a way that promotes economic development for the State; and

(2) to facilitate economic development in the State, all project sponsors should negotiate in good faith with any willing Alaskan person that desires to be involved in the project.

(Pub. L. 108–324, div. C, §115, Oct. 13, 2004, 118 Stat. 1265.)
# C_2012258EN.01000801.xml

| 25.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 258/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 258/8

---

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 April 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Staatssecretaris van Financiën v U. Notermans-Boddenberg

(Case C-114/11) (1)

1

(Articles 18 EC and 39 EC - Motor vehicles - Use in a Member State of a private motor vehicle registered in another Member State - Taxation of that vehicle in the first Member State on the occasion of its first use on the national road network - Vehicle taken at the time of moving to the first Member State and used for both private use and for going to the place of work situated in the second Member State)

2012/C 258/12

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Applicant:

Defendant: U. Notermans-Boddenberg

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Interpretation of Articles 18 EC and 39 EC (now Articles 21 TFEU and 45 TFEU) — National rules requiring payment of a registration tax on the occasion of the first use of a vehicle on the national road network — Imposition of that tax on a person who has transferred residence from another Member State, is a national of that Member State and uses, on a permanent basis, a vehicle registered in that Member State, and included in the transfer of residence, for purposes of private and work-related use involving work-related travel to that other Member State

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

Article 39 EC must be interpreted as not precluding legislation of a Member State which requires its residents who have moved from another Member State and have taken with them a vehicle registered in that latter Member State, on the occasion of the first use of that vehicle on the national road network, to pay a tax normally due on the registration of a vehicle in the first Member State, where that vehicle is essentially used permanently in the territory of that first Member State, even if that use includes journeys by those residents to their place of work in the second Member State.

---

(1)  OJ C 152, 21.5.2011.

1

---
#### § 401.90 Appeals from final Commission action; Time for appeals.

Any party participating in a hearing conducted pursuant to the provisions of this subpart may appeal any final Commission action. To be timely, such an appeal must be filed with an appropriate federal court, as provided in Article 15.1(p) of the Commission's Compact, within forty-five (45) days of final Commission action.
### §§713a–1, 713a–2. Repealed. Pub. L. 87–155, §1, Aug. 17, 1961, 75 Stat. 391

Section 713a–1, acts Mar. 8, 1938, ch. 44, §1, 52 Stat. 107; July 1, 1941, ch. 270, §2, 55 Stat. 498; Apr. 12, 1945, ch. 54, §4, 59 Stat. 51; Mar. 20, 1954, ch. 102, §1(b), 68 Stat. 30, related to annual appraisal of assets of Commodity Credit Corporation, and to restoration of any capital impairment. See section 713a–11 of this title for provisions authorizing appropriations to reimburse the Commodity Credit Corporation for its net realized yearly losses.

Section 713a–2, act Mar. 8, 1938, ch. 44, §2, 52 Stat. 107, related to deposit in Treasury of any capital excess of Commodity Credit Corporation. See section 713a–12 of this title for provisions requiring any net realized gain for the year by the Commodity Credit Corporation to be deposited in the Treasury.
# C_2014329EN.01001201.xml

| 22.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 329/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 329/12

---

Order of the General Court of 7 May 2014 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission

(Case T-511/10) (1)

1

((Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Requests for quotations - Refusal of access - Replacement of the contested measure in the course of proceedings - Failure to adapt the claim for annulment - No need to adjudicate))

2014/C 329/14

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (Athens (Greece)) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis and M. Dermitzakis, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Costa de Oliveira, E. Manhaeve and C. ten Dam, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision Ares(2010)508190 of 12 August 2010 refusing access to requests for quotations concerning certain framework contracts managed by the Publications Office of the European Union.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE and the European Commission are to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE and the European Commission are to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 15, 15.1.2011.

1

---
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 20 10

- NM

- 1 77

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
----

| Delaware                                                           |   | 000-23143               |   | 13-3379479                       |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|----------------------------------|
| (State or Other Jurisdictionof Incorporation)                      |   | (CommissionFile Number) |   | (IRS EmployerIdentification No.) |
|                                                               |   |                    |   |                             |
| 777 Old Saw Mill River Road, Tarrytown, New York                   |   | 10591                   |
| (Address of Principal Executive Offices)                           |   | (Zip Code)              |
| Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (914) 789-2800 |
| o | Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
|---|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| o | Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
|---|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| o | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
|---|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| o | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |
|---|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

----

| Item 8.01 | Other Events. |
|----------------|---------------|

----

|   | PROGENICS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. |
|--------|---------------------------------|
|   | By:                             | /s/ ANGELO W. LOVALLO, JR. |
|   |                            | Angelo W. Lovallo, Jr. |
|   |                            | Senior Executive Director, |
|   |                            | Financial Reporting & Treasurer |
|   |                            | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
#### THE WACKENHUT CORPORATION, Plaintiff v. GUAM MEMORIAL HOSPITAL AUTHORITY, Defendant

Civil Case No. 511-78

Superior Court of Guam

March 27, 1979

WEEKS, *Judge*

DECISION AND ORDER

This matter came before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Default. Roger Crouthamel appeared on behalf of the *601plaintiff and Harry Boertzel appeared for defendant. The motion was heard before the Honorable Janet H. Weeks, and decision was reserved.

Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment is premised on the failure of G.M.H.A. to answer the complaint within the twenty (20) days provided by Rule 12(a) of the Superior Court Rules of Civil Procedure. G.M.H.A. contends that it is a government agency within the meaning of Rule 12(a) and, therefore, has sixty (60) days within which to answer. The Court notes that the parties have proceeded with the action on the understanding that there has been no waiver.

Rule 12(a) was adopted from Rule 12(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure except that “the Government” appears in lieu of “the United States”. Rule 12(a) of the Superior Court Rules of Civil procedure reads:

> The Government or an officer or agency thereof shall serve an answer to the complaint, . . . within sixty (60) days after service upon the Government of the pleading in which the claim is asserted.

Federal interpretation of the term agency is therefore persuasive. The case of *Ramsey v. United Mine Workers,*27 F.R.D. 423 (1961), is often cited as an authority. It states that:

> It is logical to decide that “agency” within the meaning of Kule 12 (a) is an agency, corporate or otherwise, whose authority under congressional enactment is solely to perform governmental service as distinguished from an agency that is limited in performing governmental functions, such as a national bank.

Statutorily, agency has been defined by 28 U.S.C.A. 451, as follows:

> The term “agency” includes any department, independent establishment, commission, administration, authority, board or bureau of the United States or any corporation in which the United States has a proprietary interest, unless the context shows that such term was intended to be used in a more limited sense.

*602The Court finds that G.M.H.A. qualifies as an agency within the meaning of Rule 12(a). G.M.H.A. was established by Public Law 14-29, Government Code § 49002. In so creating G.M.H.A. the Legislature provided that:

> There is within, and a public corporation and autonomous instrumentality of the government of Guam called the Guam Memorial Hospital Authority:

Section 49003(a) mandates G.M.H.A. to:

> Maintain and operate a facility providing acute, chronic and all other health care services for the people of the Territory.

All powers vested in the hospital are exercised by a Board nominated and appointed by the Governor with the advice and consent of the Legislature. Furthermore, as an instrumentality of the Territory, the property and revenue of the hospital are exempt from taxation by the Territory. G.M.H.A. has sufficient characteristics of a governmental agency for purposes of Rule 12(a).

For the aforementioned reasons, plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.