alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ON PAGES 3 AND 4 IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          20,268
<SECURITIES>                                    16,710
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,161
<ALLOWANCES>                                        77
<INVENTORY>                                        628
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                44,444
<PP&E>                                           1,848
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,039)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  45,648
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,714
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            13
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,919
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    45,648
<SALES>                                          9,066
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,752
<CGS>                                              788
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      990
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,780
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,287
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,703
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,584
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,584
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .30
        

</TABLE>
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: SE00562A1

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
§ 385.1113 Interim relief (Rule 1113). ( a ) The petitioner may at any time file a request for interim relief in a proceeding under this subpart, setting forth the legal and factual basis for the request. Service of such request must comply with the service requirements set forth in Rule 1104(b) (initial petition of adjustment request) and must be made on each person described in such rule as well as on any other party to the proceeding.
( b ) The grounds for granting interim relief are: ( 1 ) ( i ) A showing that irreparable injury will result in the event the interim relief is denied; and
( ii ) A showing that denial of the interim relief requested will result in a more immediate special hardship or inequity to the person requesting the interim relief than the consequences that would result to other persons if the interim relief were granted; or
( 2 ) A showing that it will be in the public interest to grant the interim relief.
( c ) A party may within 10 days after the filing of the request for interim relief file a reply to the request for interim relief.
( d ) Staff may request a written statement of the views of a party regarding whether the interim relief should be granted and may convene an expedited conference on the request for interim relief.
( e ) If Staff has not granted the request for interim relief within 30 days after it is filed, the request is denied.
( f ) ( 1 ) Subject to paragraph (f)(2) of this section, Staff will issue an order granting or denying the request for interim relief and will notify the parties. Any grant of interim relief is subject to further modification in the order issued under Rule 1109 (orders).
( 2 ) The Commission may, on its own motion, at any time revoke, modify, rescind, stay or take any other appropriate action concerning the order granting interim relief.
[Order 225, 47 FR 19022, May 3, 1982, as amended by Order 24-C, 50 FR 21596, May 28, 1985]
### SUBCHAPTER XLIX—GRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK
PUBLIC LAW 113–286—DEC. 18, 2014 128 STAT. 3093 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 3008: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 160 (2014): 

Dec. 11, considered and passed Senate. 

Dec. 12, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 113–286 

113th Congress 

An Act 

To extend temporarily the extended period of protection for members of uniformed 

services relating to mortgages, mortgage foreclosure, and eviction, and for other 

purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Foreclosure Relief and Extension 

for Servicemembers Act of 2014’’. 

SEC. 2. TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF EXTENDED PERIOD OF PROTECTIONS FOR MEMBERS OF UNIFORMED SERVICES RELATING 

TO MORTGAGES, MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE, AND EVICTION. 

Section 710(d) of the Honoring America’s Veterans and Caring 

for Camp Lejeune Families Act of 2012 (Public Law 112–154; 126 

Stat. 1208) is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘December 31, 2014’’ and 

inserting ‘‘December 31, 2015’’; and 

(2) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘January 1, 2015’’ and 

inserting ‘‘January 1, 2016’’. 

Approved December 18, 2014. 

50 USC app. 503 

note. 

Foreclosure 

Relief and 

Extension for 

Servicemembers 

Act of 2014. 

50 USC app. 501 

note. 

Dec. 18, 2014 

[S. 3008] 


srobinson on DSKB307YQ1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
§ 385.1504 Maximum civil penalty (Rule 1504). ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the Commission may assess a civil penalty of up to $27,893 for each day that the violation continues.
( b ) No civil penalty may be assessed where a license or exemption is ordered revoked.
[Order 225, 47 FR 19022, May 3, 1982, as amended by Order 826, 81 FR 43941, July 6, 2016; Order 834, 82 FR 8139, Jan. 24, 2017; Order 839, 83 FR 1552, Jan. 12, 2018; Order 853, 84 FR 968, Feb. 1, 2019; Order 865, 85 FR 2018, Jan. 14, 2020; Order 875, 86 FR 8133, Feb. 4, 2021; Order 882, 87 FR 2037, Jan. 13, 2022; Order 886, 88 FR 1991, Jan. 12, 2023; Order 903, 89 FR 1808, Jan. 11, 2024]
### §78aa–1. Special provision relating to statute of limitations on private causes of action

#### (a) Effect on pending causes of action

The limitation period for any private civil action implied under section 78j(b) of this title that was commenced on or before June 19, 1991, shall be the limitation period provided by the laws applicable in the jurisdiction, including principles of retroactivity, as such laws existed on June 19, 1991.

#### (b) Effect on dismissed causes of action

Any private civil action implied under section 78j(b) of this title that was commenced on or before June 19, 1991—

(1) which was dismissed as time barred subsequent to June 19, 1991, and

(2) which would have been timely filed under the limitation period provided by the laws applicable in the jurisdiction, including principles of retroactivity, as such laws existed on June 19, 1991,

shall be reinstated on motion by the plaintiff not later than 60 days after December 19, 1991.

(June 6, 1934, ch. 404, title I, §27A, as added Pub. L. 102–242, title IV, §476, Dec. 19, 1991, 105 Stat. 2387.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Constitutionality

For information regarding the constitutionality of certain provisions of this section, see the Table of Laws Held Unconstitutional in Whole or in Part by the Supreme Court on the Constitution Annotated website, constitution.congress.gov.
Exhibit 23.2

 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8) pertaining to the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan of Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. of our report dated March 13, 2014, with respect to the financial statements and schedule of Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc., included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2013, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.





/s/ Ernst & Young LLP



Hartford, CT

June 27, 2014
#### Logan & Logan, Inc., Doing Business as Cedar Lodge Nursing Home, Respondent, v Audrey Lane Laufer, LLC, Appellant.

[824 NYS2d 650]

In an action, inter alia, to compel the defendant to consent to the assignment of a lease, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Pitts, J.), dated July 22, 2005, which granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is denied.

When a commercial lease provides that the landlord will not unreasonably withhold consent to its assignment, the landlord may refuse to consent to an assignment based only on “consideration of objective factors, such as the financial responsibility of the [proposed assignee], the [proposed assignee’s] suitability for the particular building, the legality of the proposed use and the nature of the occupancy, i.e., office, factory, retail” *(Astoria Bedding, Mr. Sleeper Bedding Ctr. v Northside Partnership,*239 AD2d 775, 776 [1997]; *see Kenney v Eddygate Park*Assoc., 19 AD3d 859, 860 [2005]; Sayed v *Rapp,*10 AD3d 717, 720 [2004]). Thus, “subjective concerns and personal desires cannot play a role in a landlord’s decision to withhold its consent to an as*540signment of a lease” *(Ontel Corp. v Helasol Realty Corp.,*130 AD2d 639, 640 [1987]; *cf. International Chefs v Corporate Prop. Invs.,*240 AD2d 369, 370 [1997]).

Here, there exists a triable issue of fact as to whether the defendant landlord withheld its consent to the proposed assignment based on objective concerns, and thus whether its withholding of consent was reasonable. Crane, J.E, Ritter, Rivera and Lunn, JJ., concur.
### **CHAPTER 97—CONVENTION ON THE CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT OF HIGH SEAS FISHERY RESOURCES IN THE SOUTH PACIFIC**

Sec.
7801.
Definitions.
7802.
Appointment or designation of United States Commissioners.
7803.
Authority and responsibility of the Secretary of State.
7804.
Responsibility of the Secretary and rulemaking authority.
7805.
Enforcement.
7806.
Prohibited acts.
7807.
Cooperation in carrying out the Convention.
7808.
Territorial participation.
7809.
Exclusive economic zone notification.
7810.
Authorization of appropriations.
U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1 

49–011 2015

114th Congress, 1st Session – – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 114–26 

PROPOSED RESCISSION OF CUBA’S DESIGNATION AS 

A STATE SPONSOR OF TERRORISM 

MESSAGE 

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 

TRANSMITTING

A REPORT ON THE PROPOSED RESCISSION OF CUBA’S 

DESIGNATION AS A STATE SPONSOR OF TERRORISM 

APRIL 15, 2015.—Message and accompanying papers referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs and ordered to be printed 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with HDOCE:\Seals\Congress.#13

smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with HDOC
(1) 

To the Congress of the United States: 

I transmit herewith a report to the Congress with respect to the 

proposed rescission of Cuba’s designation as a state sponsor of terrorism. 

BARACK OBAMA. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, April 14, 2015. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with HDOC
2 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with HDOCInsert offset folio 3 here HD26.001
3 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with HDOCInsert offset folio 4 here HD26.002
4 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with HDOCInsert offset folio 5 here HD26.003
5 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with HDOCInsert offset folio 6 here HD26.004
6 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with HDOCInsert offset folio 7 here HD26.005
7 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with HDOCInsert offset folio 8 here HD26.006
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000 THAT WERE
FILED WITH THE COMPANY'S REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>1

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  43,262
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          301,029
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           600
<OTHER-SE>                                    (258,367)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    43,262
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                36,065
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (36,065)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (36,065)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (36,065)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.06)



</TABLE>
#### § 740.9 Recordkeeping.

Each State or other entity within a State receiving financial assistance under this part shall make and retain records required by the Council, including records which fully disclose the amount and disposition of financial assistance received; the cost of administration; the total cost of all activities for which assistance is given or used; and any data and information which the Council determines are necessary to protect the interests of the United States and to facilitate an effective financial audit and performance evaluation. The Council and the Comptroller General of the United States shall have access to any books, documents, records or receipts which the Council determines are relevant or pertinent, either directly or indirectly, to any financial assistance provided under this part. Such records shall be retained for a period of three years, which starts from the date of the submission of the annual financial status report for the grant period.
Serial: 231557 

### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No. 89-R-99001-SCT
INRE: THERULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
EN BANC ORDER 

# FILED MAY 05 

## 2020 OFFICE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURT COURT OF APPEALS
Before the en bane Court is the Motion to Amend M.R.C.P. 43 (Motion No. 2019- 3487), filed by the Advisory Committee on Rules. After due consideration, we find that the motion should be granted. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Motion to Amend M.R.C.P. 43 is granted. Rule 43 is amended as setforth inthe attachedExhibitA. The amendments shallbeeffective
on July 1, 2020. SO ORDERED, this the

ALL JUSTICES AGREE. 

# f; day of a

# 202ru

MICHAEL K. RANDOLPH, CHIEF JUSTICE FOR THE COURTEXHIBIT A RULE 43. TAKING OF TESTIMONY (a) Form and Admissibility. In all trials the testimony ofwitnesses shall be taken orally in open court, unless otherwise provided by these rules or the Mississippi Rules of Evidence. (b) [Ab1 ogated] (c) [Ab1 ogated] trl)

### ® Affirmation in Lieu ofOath. Wheneverunderthese rules an oath is required to be taken, a solemn affirmation may be accepted in lieu thereof. 

## te1 W Evidence on Motions. When a motion is based on facts not appearing of recordthe court mayhearthe matter on affidavits presentedbytherespectiveparties, butthe court may direct that the matter be heard wholly or partly on oral testimony or depositions. 

### ffl@Interpreters. The court may appoint an interpreter ofits own selection and may assess fix his reasonable compensation. The compensation shall be paid out offunds provided by law or by one or more ofthe parties as the court may direct and may be taxed ultimately as costs, inthe discretion ofthe court. However, inthe event andto the extentthat such interpreters are required to be provided under the provisions ofthe Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S. C. § 12131, 

### et seq. or under rules or regulations promulgated pursuant thereto, such compensation and other costs of compliance shall be paid by the county in which the court sits, and shall not be taxed as costs. (Amended effective January 10, 1986; amended June 5, 1997: amended effective July 1, 2020.] Advisory Committee Historical Note Effective July 1, 2020, Rule 43 was amended to re-designate former Rule 43(d) [Affirmation inLieu ofOath] as Rule 43(b); to re-designate former Rule 43(e) [Evidence on Motions] as Rule 43(c); and to re-designate former Rule 43(1) [Interpreters] as Rule 43(d). EffectiveJuly 1, 1998, Rule 43(f) [Interpreters] was amendedinregardto compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12131, et seq. Effective January 10, 1986, Rule 43(a) was amended to provide.that testimony may be taken other than in open court, as provided by the Mississippi Rules ofEvidence, and to 2delete references to the admissibility of evidence; Rule 43(b) [Mode and Order of Interrogation], andRule43(c) [Record ofExcludedEvidence] were abrogated. 478-481 So. -2d XXVII (West Miss. Cas. 1986).

3
|   |      1)  The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |      2)  The      information contained in the Report fairly represents, in      all material respects, the financial condition and results of      operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                           |   |                                                                  |
|--------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                           |   |                                                                  |   |
| Date:       July 22, 2009 |   | /s/ Karl      B. Gemperli                                        |   |
|                           |   | Karl      B. Gemperli                                                 |   |
|                           |   | President,      Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |   |
|                           |   |                                                                  |   |
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Document Search 
-  HUBZone Eligibility Workbook 

# HUBZone eligibility workbook

## About this document and download

Filling out the workbook tool and uploading it as part of your application will help expedite SBA’s review of your HUBZone application. If you have questions about the workbook tool or would like to provide feedback, reach out to hubzone@sba.gov.

  Download  .xlsm

**Owned by**

**Related Programs**    Related programs:  

##                 Related documents            

-        Support          HUBZone Supporting Documents Checklist
#### § 286.107 Verification.

The facts stated in the memorandum must be sworn to by persons having knowledge thereof, which latter fact must affirmatively appear in the affidavit. Except under unusual circumstances, such persons should be those who would appear as witnesses if hearing were had to testify as to the facts stated in the memorandum.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Document Search 
-  How-to Guide: Industrial Assessment Center (IAC) Implementation Grants For Small Businesses 

# How-to Guide: Industrial Assessment Center (IAC) Implementation Grants for Small Businesses

## About this document and download

Read more about Investing in America.

  Download  .pptx
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 7**  **809**

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. JAMES PRESTON SMITH , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia , at Beckley
. Irene C. Berger , District Judge. ( 5:99

- cr - 00161

- 1; 5:09

- cv - 01257 )

Submitted : February 26 , 2013 Decided: February 28, 2013

Before MOTZ, WYNN , and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Dismiss ed by un published per curiam opinion
.

J ames Preston Smith , Appellant Pro Se. John J. Frail , Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia , for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: James Preston Smith seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and denying as successive his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2012 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealabilit y. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner sa tisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutio nal right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Smith has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument beca use the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED