alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex10-121.htm


 

Exhibit 10.12.1

 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 

This First Amendment to Employment Agreement (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of the 9th day of February, 2016, by and between Stephen Arcana (the “Executive”), and Golden Entertainment, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, including its subsidiaries and Affiliates (collectively, the “Company”).

 

RECITALS

 

WHEREAS, the Executive and the Company previously entered into that certain Employment Agreement made and entered into as of the 1st day of October, 2015 (the “Agreement”), pursuant to which Executive currently is employed at will by the Company; and

 

WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive wish to enter into this Amendment to modify certain terms of the Agreement.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants and the respective undertakings of the Company and the Executive set forth below, the Company and the Executive agree as follows:

 

AGREEMENT

 

Amendment1.     . Section 7(c)(ii) of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and such Section is hereby replaced with the following new Section 7(c)(ii):

 

 

“(ii) Severance Payment. The Executive shall be entitled to receive severance benefits equal to (A) an amount equal to one hundred sixty-five percent (165%) of his annual Base Salary (at the rate in effect immediately preceding his termination of employment), multiplied by (B) two (2), payable in a lump sum on the sixtieth (60th) day after the date of Executive’s termination of employment.”

 

2.     Status of Agreement. Except to the limited extent expressly amended hereby, the Agreement and its terms and conditions remain in full force and effect and unchanged by this Amendment. Capitalized terms used herein but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed such terms in the Agreement.

 

3.     Counterparts and Facsimile Signatures. This Amendment may be executed simultaneously in one or more counterparts hereof, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. Facsimile signatures are permitted and shall be binding for purposes of this Amendment. 

 

[Signature Page Follows]

 

 


 

 




 


 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive has hereunto set the Executive’s hand and, pursuant to the due authorization of its Board, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed in its name and on its behalf, all as of the day and year first written above.

 

 

 

	
GOLDEN ENTERTAINMENT, INC.:

	
EXECUTIVE:

	
By: /s/ Blake L. Sartini
	
By:/s/ Stephen A. Arcana

	
Name: Blake L. Sartini
	
      Stephen Arcana

	
Its:      President and Chief Executive Officer
	  


 

 

2
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 28, 2009

p0420 

# Order

April 28, 2009

137890

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137890 COA: 269999 Wayne CC: 05-003753 ANTHONY LEE BAISDEN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e October 28, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE in part the judgment of the Court of Appeals and we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration of the defendant’s claims of sentencing error. On September 26, 2008, this Court reversed in part the judgment of the Court of Appeals an d remanded this case to the Court of Appeals

for consideration of the defendant’s remaini ng issues. In a memorandum opinion, the Court of Appeals adopted the analysis of the dissenting opinion from its unpublished per curiam opinion issued March 4, 2008 (Doc ket No. 269999) for its resolution of the remaining issues. The court then affirmed the defendant’s conviction and sentence. However, the dissenting opinion had dete rmined that the defendant should be resentenced, finding that the trial court a bused its discretion in departing from the sentencing guidelines because th e reasons articulated for depa rture were not substantial and compelling, as required by MCL 769.34(3). The Court of Appeals affirmance of the defendant’s sentence in its memorandum opinion is inconsistent with the determination that resentencing is required. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questi ons presented should be reviewed by this

Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.
Dark-Green Veggies

in the House Tonight!

Explore a world of possibilities 

in the garden and on your plate.

U.S. Department of Agriculture • Food and Nutrition Service 

April 2013 • FNS-454-E • USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

Add spinach to 

your sandwich. 

•

Snack on broccoli.

•

Make a salad.

•

Eat your greens. 

They’re nature’s 

rock stars!
-  Home 
-  About Us 

# In This Section

                      -  The GLS Today                          -  What does the GLS do? 
                        -  The St. Lawrence Seaway Management Corporation 
                        -  The Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Seaway System 
                        -  Meet the Administrator 
                        -  Meet Our Team 
                        -  Careers at the GLS 
                        -  Contact the GLS 
                      -  Historic Photos and Other Artifacts 

## Contact the GLS

Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation (GLS)Policy HeadquartersU.S. Department of Transportation
1200 New Jersey Ave, SE W62-300Washington, DC20590United States

**Email:**GLS@dot.gov**Phone:**202-366-0091****Alt Phone:**800-785-2779****Fax:**202-366-7147****Business Hours:**8:00am-5:00 pm ET, M-F

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

                            - GLS on Facebook
                            - GLS on Twitter
                            - GLS on Instagram
                            - Great Lakes - St. Lawrence Seaway

# GLS Advisory Board meeting minutes November 17, 2020

Advisory Board Meeting Minutes (11-17-2020).pdf (235.04 KB)
May 28, 2015 

 

Mr. Ryan Titmas 

1258 Barbara Dr. 

Venice, FL 34285 

Dear Mr. Titmas: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your April 22, 2015, exemption request on behalf into the public docket 

(No. FAA-2015-1117), but we are unable to process your request any further. The 

information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For 

us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division 

Enclosure
#### § 93.409 Articles accompanying ruminants.

No litter or manure, fodder or other aliment, nor any equipment such as boxes, buckets, ropes, chains, blankets, or other things used for or about ruminants governed by the regulations in this part, shall be landed from any conveyance except under such restrictions as the inspector in charge at the port of entry shall direct.
### SUBCHAPTER V—FOREST FOUNDATION
### SUBCHAPTER XCIV—ARAPAHO NATIONAL RECREATION AREA
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: J. Ray Riley v. Nick C. Caridas

Appellate case number: 01

- 19

- 00114

- CV

Trial court case number: 2016

- 04629

Trial court: 281st District Court of Harris County

The reporter’s record was originally due on March 26, 2019. This Court has granted three requests for extension until June 24, 2019, the last of which stated that the Court would not grant further extensions absent a showing of exceptional circumst ances. The court reporter, Sheila R. Skidmore, has now filed three mo r e r equest s for extension , stating that she is unable to complete the preparation of the record because she is busy working on other records and due to her mother’s

illness

. Although the Court is sympathetic to court reporter Skidmore’s difficulties, this reporter’s

record is almost five months overdue and the delay is preventing the parties from filing their briefs.

Accordingly, the Court denies Skidmore’s pending requests for extension a nd abates the appeal and remands to the trial court for a hearing to determine why court reporter Skidmore is unable to complete the reporter’s record and when she will complete and file the reporter’s record.

The trial court shall prepare a record, in the form of a reporter’s record, of the hearing. The judge shall make findings of fact and shall order the trial clerk to forward to this court a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings. The hearing record and supplemental clerk’s record shall

be filed with the clerk of this court no later than September 16 , 2019

.
It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

____

/s/ Peter Kelly

_____  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date:

__ August 15, 2019

_____
§ 700.455 Financial assistance. ( a ) The Commission may provide financial assistance to applicants eligible under this subpart from funds available for any fiscal year.
( b ) To obtain financial assistance, an applicant shall submit an application in accordance with § 700.463.
( c ) The Commission may make funding decisions throughout the year as applications are approved. The Commission shall, to the extent possible, make funds available throughout the year for approved applications. Based upon the merit of applications received under this subpart, the Commission shall determine how funds available under this subpart shall be apportioned among the activities described in §§ 700.457 and 700.459.
February 3, 2016 

### STATE OF MINNESOTA

IN SUPREME COURT A15-1357
In re Petitionfor Disciplinary Action against Mitchell Alan Robinson, a MinnesotaAttorney, Registration No. 0281359.
ORDER**Om~EOF** API'B.LAmCcuna



### The Director ofthe Office ofLawyers Professional Responsibility filed a petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Mitchell Alan Robinson committed professional misconductwarrantingpublic discipline

- namely, failing to competently and diligently represent and communicatewith a clientin a criminal matter, see

### Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.1, 1.3, 1.4(a)(3) and 8.4(d); and failing to diligentlyrepresent and communicate with a client in an immigration matter, see 

### Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.3, 1.4(a)(2), and 1.4(a)(3). Respondent now waives his procedural rights under Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR), withdraws his previously filed answer, and unconditionally admits the allegations inthe petition. The partiesjointlyrecommendthat the appropriate discipline is a public reprimand and 2 years ofunsupervised probation. The court has independently reviewed the file and approves the recommended disposition. 

### Basedupon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

1IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Respondent Mitchell Alan Robinson is publicly reprimanded. 2. Respondent shall pay $900 in costs pursuanttoRule 24, RLPR. 3. Respondent is placed on probation for 2 years, subject to the following conditions: (a) Respondent shall cooperate fully with the Director's Office in its efforts to monitor compliance with this probation. Respondent shall promptly respond to the Director's correspondence by its due date. Respondent shall provide the Director with a current mailing address and shall immediately notify the Directorofany change ofaddress. Respondent shall cooperate with the Director's investigation of any allegations of unprofessional conductthat may cometo the Director's attention. Uponthe Director's request, respondent shall provide authorization for release of information and documentation to verify respondent's compliance with the terms ofthis probation; and (b) Respondent shall abide by the Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct.
Dated: February 3, 2016

2 BYTHE COURT:

David R. Stras Associate Justice
EXHIBIT 23


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

     THE STOCKHOLDERS AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE GILLETTE COMPANY

     We consent to incorporation by reference in the following registration
statements of The Gillette Company and any amendments thereto (1) No. 333-101112
on Form S-3, (2) No. 333-86334 on Form S-4, (3) No. 333-86336 on Form S-3, (4)
No. 333-59420 on Form S-8, (5) No. 333-63850 on Form S-8, (6) No. 333-55790 on
Form S-8, (7) No. 333-75517 on Form S-3, (8) No. 33-9495 on Form S-8, (9) No.
2-93230 on Form S-8, (10) Nos. 33-56218 and 33-27916 on Form S-8 which
incorporate by reference therein registration statements on Form S-8 Nos.
2-90276, 2-63951 and 1-50710 and No. 2-41016 on Form S-7, (11) No. 33-54974 on
Form S-3, (12) No. 33-50303 on Form S-3, (13) No. 33-52465 on Form S-8, (14) No.
33-53257 on Form S-8, (15) No. 33-53258 on Form S-8, (16) No. 33-55051 on Form
S-3, (17) No. 33-59125 on Form S-8, (18) No. 33-63707 on Form S-8, (19) No.
333-16735 on Form S-4, (20) No. 333-19133 on Form S-8, (21), No. 333-25533 on
Form S-8 and (22) No. 333-44257 on Form S-3 of our report dated February 20,
2004, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of The Gillette Company and
subsidiary companies as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related
consolidated statements of income, cash flows and stockholders' equity for each
of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003, which report is
incorporated by reference in the December 31, 2003, Annual Report on Form 10-K
of The Gillette Company.


/s/ KPMG LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 1, 2004
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  SBA Leadership 
-  Victor Parker 

#   Victor Parker

Deputy Associate Administrator

Office of Field Operations

            Download high-resolution image          

Victor Parker serves as the Deputy Associate Administrator for the Office of Field Operations.

Prior to joining the SBA, Victor worked in various capacities as a small business manager and corporate executive for nearly 20 years. His responsibilities included managing regulatory affairs, intellectual property licensing agreements, and contract negotiations. As his career advanced, he also gained expertise in small business joint venture manufacturing with in-depth consulting agreements, and supplier diversity development and expansion. He has experience with SBA programs from the small business side, government contracting and the 8(a) certification process in particular.

In addition to Victor’s broad management and leadership experience in the private sector, he is actively engaged in serving several civic, nonprofit and community-based organizations in the Southern California area, including serving on the Civil Service Commission, Sustainable City Committee and on the Board of Directors of the Community Development Centers, Inc.

Victor earned his Bachelor’s Degree from the University of California at Berkeley and Juris Doctor from Pepperdine University School of Law.

## Blogs by   Victor Parker

                  -  SBA Shares Resources for Black-Owned Businesses During National Black History MonthBy Victor Parker on February 5, 2021
SBA encourages black business owners to leverage the following tools to grow, expand, or recover.
### §1151. Restriction on construction of vessels in foreign shipyards

(a) Except as provided in subsection (b), no Coast Guard vessel, and no major component of the hull or superstructure of a Coast Guard vessel, may be constructed in a foreign shipyard.

(b) The President may authorize exceptions to the prohibition in subsection (a) when the President determines that it is in the national security interest of the United States to do so. The President shall transmit notice to Congress of any such determination, and no contract may be made pursuant to the exception authorized until the end of the 30-day period beginning on the date the notice of such determination is received by Congress.

(Added Pub. L. 100–448, §26(a), Sept. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 1847, §665; renumbered §1151, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §108(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4208.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 665 of this title as this section.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended April 1, 2006
of the Company, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Deborah H. Merrill

Deborah H. MerrillVice President & Chief Accounting Officer
  29
### §80b–6. Prohibited transactions by investment advisers

It shall be unlawful for any investment adviser by use of the mails or any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, directly or indirectly—

(1) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud any client or prospective client;

(2) to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates as a fraud or deceit upon any client or prospective client;

(3) acting as principal for his own account, knowingly to sell any security to or purchase any security from a client, or acting as broker for a person other than such client, knowingly to effect any sale or purchase of any security for the account of such client, without disclosing to such client in writing before the completion of such transaction the capacity in which he is acting and obtaining the consent of the client to such transaction. The prohibitions of this paragraph shall not apply to any transaction with a customer of a broker or dealer if such broker or dealer is not acting as an investment adviser in relation to such transaction; or

(4) to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which is fraudulent, deceptive, or manipulative. The Commission shall, for the purposes of this paragraph (4) by rules and regulations define, and prescribe means reasonably designed to prevent, such acts, practices, and courses of business as are fraudulent, deceptive, or manipulative.

(Aug. 22, 1940, ch. 686, title II, §206, 54 Stat. 852; Pub. L. 86–750, §§8, 9, Sept. 13, 1960, 74 Stat. 887; Pub. L. 111–203, title IX, §985(e)(2), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 1935.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2010—Par. (3). Pub. L. 111–203 inserted "or" at end.

1960—Pub. L. 86–750, §8, struck out "registered under section 80b–3 of this title" from introductory text.

Par. (4). Pub. L. 86–750, §9, added par. (4).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2010 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 111–203 effective 1 day after July 21, 2010, except as otherwise provided, see section 4 of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as an Effective Date note under section 5301 of Title 12, Banks and Banking.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection with the quarterly report of GoAmerica, Inc. (the "Company")
on  Form  10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  (the "Report"), I, Daniel R. Luis, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

(1)  The  Report  fully  complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  consolidated  financial condition of the Company as of the dates
presented  and consolidated results of operations of the Company for the periods
presented.

Dated:  August 14, 2003

                                    /s/  Daniel  R.  Luis
                                   ---------------------------
                                   Daniel  R.  Luis
                                   Chief  Executive  Officer



This  certification  has  been  furnished  solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002.


<PAGE>
# C_2012303EN.01000301.xml

| 6.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/3

---

Order of the Court of 7 June 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Benevento — Italy) — Volturno Trasporti Sas di Santoro Nino e c. v Camera di Commercio di Benevento, Equitalia Polis SpA

(Case C-21/11) (1)

1

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Manifest inadmissibility)

2012/C 303/03

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Commissione tributaria provinciale di Benevento (Italy)

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Volturno Trasporti Sas di Santoro Nino e c.

Applicant:

Defendants: Camera di Commercio di Benevento, Equitalia Polis SpA

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Commissione tributaria provinciale di Benevento — Interpretation of Article 10(c) of Council Directive No 69/335/EEC of 17 July 1969 concerning indirect taxes on the raising of capital (OJ, English Special Edition 1969 (II), p. 412) — Indirect taxes on the raising of capital — Imposition of an annual fee for entry in the register of companies kept by the local chambers of commerce — Whether permissible

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The reference for a preliminary ruling made by the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Benevento (Italy), by decision of 22 September 2010, is manifestly inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 95, 26.3.2011.

1

---
#### § 12.4 Inquiries concerning application of act.

Inquiries concerning the application of the act must be accompanied by a detailed statement of all facts necessary for a determination of the question submitted, including the identity of the person on whose behalf the inquiry is made, the facts which may bring such person within the registration provisions of the act, and the identity of the foreign government or foreign political party concerned.