alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The Toledo, Wabash and Western Railway Co. *v.*Joseph Spangler.

*Railroad—when not required to fence their track and make cattle-guards.*A railroad company is not bound to fence its track or make cattle-guards within the limits of a village; and a place where there is a station house, a warehouse, a.store, a blacksmith shop, a postoflice and five or six dwelling houses, whether the)' arc situated upon regularly laid out streets and alleys or not, comes fully up to the requirements of a village, for the purpose of excusing a railroad company from fencing its track within the ' limits thereof.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Macon county; the Hon, Arthur J. Gallagher, Judge, presiding.

Messrs. Nelson & Roby, for the appellant.

Messrs. Eden & Odor, for the appellee.

*569Mr. Justice Sheldon

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This was an action on the case, brought by appellee against appellant, to recover for injury to stock on the railway of the latter, alleged to have been occasioned by the neglect of appellant to fence its road and make suitable cattle-guards at a highway crossing.

No denial is made of the fact that the stock injured got on the track at a highway crossing, and it is not claimed that there were cattle-guards at the place, or that the road was fenced, but appellant insists that the highway crossing was within the limits of a village, and that the railway company was not bound to fence its road or construct cattle-guards at that place, and this is the only question which is made.

It ajipears, from the evidence, that the place was called Sangamon Switch, or Sangamon Station ; that there were 1090 feet of side-track between the switch-stands there; that the stock got on the track within the limits of the switch, the highway being near the center of the switch, and 25 to 30 steps from the station house; that the open space occupied by the switch has always been used by the people of the neighborhood in handling freight, loading grain, etc., a great deal of freight business being done there.

There are at this locality, a station house, a warehouse, one store, a blacksmith shop, a postoffice, and five or six dwelling houses.

We think this place comes fully up to the requirements of a village, as recognized by this court in *Illinois Central Railroad Co.*v. *Williams,*27 Ill. 49. It was there said: “Any small assemblage of houses for dwellings or business, or both, in the country, constitutes a village, whether they are situated upon regularly laid out streets and alleys or not.” And see *Toledo, Wabash and Western Railway Co.*v. *Chapin,*66 Ill. 504.

*570This road crossing, then, being within the limits of a village, the company were not required to fence their track or have cattle-guards there. *Headen*v. *Rust.*39 Ill. 186. And consequently are not chargeable with neglect in'that respect.

The judgment must be reversed, and the cause remanded.

*Judgment reversed.*
###### Editorial Note on Part 900

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

#### § 900.135 May the time frames for action set out in this subpart be reduced?

Yes. The time frames in this subpart are intended to be maximum times and may be reduced based on urgency and need, by agreement of the parties. If the Indian tribe or tribal organization requests reduced time frames for action due to unusual or special conditions (such as limited construction periods), the Secretary shall make a good faith effort to accommodate the requested time frames.
### §657f–1. Certification of small business concerns owned and controlled by veterans

#### (a) In general

With respect to the program established under section 8127 of title 38, the Administrator shall—

(1) certify the status of a concern as a small business concern owned and controlled by veterans; and

(2) require the periodic recertification of such status.

#### (b) Enforcement; penalties

#### (1) Verification of eligibility

In carrying out this section, the Administrator shall establish procedures relating to—

(A) the filing, investigation, and disposition by the Administration of any challenge to the eligibility of a small business concern to receive assistance under section 657f of this title (including a challenge, filed by an interested party, relating to the veracity of a certification made or information provided to the Administration by a small business concern under subsection (a)); and

(B) verification by the Administrator of the accuracy of any certification made or information provided to the Administration by a small business concern under subsection (a).

#### (2) Examination of applicants

The procedures established under paragraph (1) shall provide for a program of examinations by the Administrator of any small business concern making a certification or providing information to the Administrator under subsection (a), to determine the veracity of any statements or information provided as part of such certification or otherwise provided under subsection (a).

(Pub. L. 85–536, §2[36A], as added Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title VIII, §862(e), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3781.)
Exhibit 99.03

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of VOLT Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  December 31, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The  Report fully complies with the  requirements  of  Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material  respects,  the financial condition and results
                  of operations of the Company.

February 19, 2003                        By: /s/ Denis C. Tseklenis
                                                 Denis C. Tseklenis
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
# C_2011331EN.01002102.xml

| 12.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/21

---

Order of the General Court of 14 September 2011 — Italy v Commission

(Case T-239/10) (1)

1

(ERDF - Reduction of financial assistance - Withdrawal of the contested debit note - Cessation of existence of the dispute - No need to adjudicate)

2011/C 331/41

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Italian Republic (represented by: P. Gentili, avvocato dello Stato)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Prete and A. Steiblytė, agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for annulment of debit note No 3241001630 of 26 February 2010 concerning Commission Decision C(2009) 10350 of 22 December 2009, incorporating a reduction in the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) assistance granted in application of Commission Decision C(2000) 2349 of 8 August 2000, incorporating approval of the operational programme POR Puglia for the period 2000-2006, on the basis of Objective No 1.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | Each party shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each party shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 195, 17.7.2010.

1

---
OSD Response to Public Comment on DO D

- 201 4

- OS

- 0 002

- 000 1

Comment: 1974 is a long time ago. I hope you are treating personnel records with more up to date standards. Electronic records are fairly easy to get despite physical barriers. And the correlation of the data is easy to do. And there is a risk that the data will be used to discriminate in insurance rates, mortgage rates and hiring. Please be careful. Perhaps it’s better to keep as much on paper as possible, despite the advantages that technology offers. Sometimes it’s better to be inefficient, where human lives are concerned. I’m a technology consultant...and I have a vested interest in people using more and more technology. But it’s not always the best thing for communities...

Response: A singl e comment was received providing comments on a number of issues but nothing specific to the subject of this Privacy Act System of Records Notice. The subject System of Records Notice pertains to the submission of post

- secondary education complaints for mi litary members and their spouses. The information is not used to determine insurance or mortgage rates nor is it used in hiring. Executive Order 13607, Establishing Principles of Excellence for Educational Institutions Serving Service Members, Veterans, Spouses, and Other Family Members required the Department of Defense to establish a mechanism for military members and their spouses to submit post

secondary education complaints on

- line, any submissions received by mail will be added to the system. The D oD has ensured that appropriate safeguards are used to protect the integrity of the data stored in this system.
###### Editorial Note on Part 0

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 0 appear at 73 FR 73 FR 54947, Sept. 24, 2008.

#### § 0.106 Certificates for expenses of unforeseen emergencies.

The Commissioner of Immigration and Naturalization is authorized to exercise the power and authority vested in the Attorney General by section 6 of the act of July 28, 1950, 64 Stat. 380 (8 U.S.C. 1555), to make certificates with respect to expenses of unforeseen emergencies of a confidential character: *Provided,* That each such certificate made by the Commissioner of Immigration and Naturalization shall be approved by the Attorney General.
### SUBCHAPTER I—PLANNING
§ 385.203 Content of pleadings and tariff or rate filings (Rule 203). ( a ) *Requirements for a pleading or a tariff or rate filing.* Each pleading and each tariff or rate filing must include, as appropriate: ( 1 ) If known, the reference numbers, docket numbers, or other identifying symbols of any relevant tariff, rate, schedule, contract, application, rule, or similar matter or material;
( 2 ) The name of each participant for whom the filing is made or, if the filing is made for a group of participants, the name of the group, provided that the name of each member of the group is set forth in a previously filed document which is identified in the filing being made;
( 3 ) The specific authorization or relief sought;
( 4 ) The tariff or rate sheets or sections;
( 5 ) The name and address of each person against whom the complaint is directed;
( 6 ) The relevant facts, if not set forth in a previously filed document which is identified in the filing being made;
( 7 ) The position taken by the participant filing any pleading, to the extent known when the pleading is filed, and the basis in fact and law for such position;
( 8 ) Subscription or verification, if required;
( 9 ) A certificate of service under Rule 2010(h), if service is required;
( 10 ) The name, address, and telephone number of an individual who, with respect to any matter contained in the filing, represents the person for whom filing is made; and
( 11 ) Any additional information required to be included by statute, rule, or order.
( b ) *Requirement for any initial pleading or tariff or rate filing.* The initial pleading or tariff or rate filing submitted by a participant or a person seeking to become a party must conform to the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section and must include: ( 1 ) The exact name of the person for whom the filing is made;
( 2 ) The location of that person's principal place of business; and
( 3 ) The name, address, and telephone number of at least one, but not more than two, persons upon whom service is to be made and to whom communications are to be addressed in the proceeding.
( c ) *Combined filings.* If two or more pleadings, or one or more pleadings and a tariff or rate filing are included as items in a single filing each such item must be separately designated and must conform to the requirements which would be applicable to it if filed separately.
( d ) *Form of notice.* If a pleading or tariff or rate filing must include a form of notice suitable for publication in the Federal Register, the company shall submit the draft notice in accordance with the form of notice specifications prescribed by the Secretary and posted on the Commission's website under Filing Procedures at *https://www.ferc.gov .*
[Order 225, 47 FR 19022, May 3, 1982, as amended by Order 647, 69 FR 32439, June 10, 2004; Order 663, 70 FR 55725, Sept. 23, 2005; 71 FR 14642, Mar. 23, 2006; Order 714, 73 FR 57538, Oct. 3, 2008; Order 899, 88 FR 74032, Oct. 30, 2023]
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Marcel de Groot, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Luna Gold Corp.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15) for the registrant and we have:

a)     designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)     evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)     presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)     all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)     any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Dated this 13th day of August, 2004.



| | /s/ Marcel de Groot                        
| | -------------------------------------------
| | Marcel de Groot
Principal Financial Officer





---
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 01, 2021. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, September 01, 2021 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A22I0011. JUDY E. OSOWA v. ALEXANDER E. OSOWA. Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 19A02446
### SUBCHAPTER L—CARLSBAD CAVERNS NATIONAL PARK
###### Editorial Note on Part 0

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 0 appear at 73 FR 73 FR 54947, Sept. 24, 2008.

#### § 0.166 Memorandum pertaining to closed claim.

In each case in which a claim is closed under § 0.164 the Assistant Attorney General concerned shall execute and place in the file pertaining to the claim a memorandum which shall contain a description of the claim and a full statement of the reasons for closing it.
§ 1318.402 Scoping process. ( a ) As soon as practicable after the decision to prepare an EIS is made, the NEPA compliance staff, in consultation with other TVA entities, will identify preliminary action alternatives, probable environmental issues, and necessary environmental permits, and a schedule for EIS preparation.
( b ) The scoping process may include interagency scoping sessions to coordinate an action with and obtain inputs from other interested agencies (including local, State, and other Federal agencies, as well as Indian tribes).
( c ) The NEPA compliance staff, in consultation with other TVA entities, will determine whether public scoping meetings should be held in addition to seeking comments by other means. Meeting types and formats should be selected to facilitate timely and meaningful public input into the EIS process.
( d ) As soon as practicable in the scoping process, the NEPA compliance staff, in consultation with the initiating TVA entity and TVA legal counsel, will prepare and publish in the Federal Register a notice of intent to prepare an EIS. This notice will briefly describe the proposed action, possible alternatives, and potentially affected environmental resources. In addition, the notice will identify issues that TVA has tentatively determined to be insignificant and which will not be discussed in detail in the EIS. The scoping process will be described and, if a scoping meeting will be held, the notice should state where and when the meeting is to occur if that has been determined. The notice will identify the person in TVA who can supply additional information about the action and describe how to submit comments.
( e ) There will be a minimum public comment period of 30 days from the date of publication of the notice of intent in the Federal Register to allow other interested agencies and the public an opportunity to review and comment on the proposed scope of the EIS.
( f ) On the basis of input received, the NEPA compliance staff, in consultation with other TVA entities, will determine whether to modify the schedule or scope of the EIS.
( g ) At the close of the scoping process, the NEPA compliance staff, in consultation with the other TVA entities, will identify the following components in paragraphs (g)(1) through (8) for use in preparing the DEIS: ( 1 ) Purpose and need of the proposed action.
( 2 ) Reasonable action alternatives.
( 3 ) Environmental issues to be addressed in detail.
( 4 ) Environmental issues that should be mentioned but not addressed in detail.
( 5 ) Lead and cooperating agency roles and responsibilities.
( 6 ) Related environmental documents.
( 7 ) Other environmental review and consultation requirements.
( 8 ) Delegation of DEIS work assignments to TVA entities and other agencies.
( h ) If a scoping report summarizing the preceding EIS components is prepared, it must be made available to the public.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 THAT WERE
FILED WITH THE COMPANY'S REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLAR

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                         (1)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Document Search 
-  SBA Mentor Protégé Program Agreement Template 

# SBA Mentor Protégé  Program  Agreement Template

## About this document and download

  Download  .pdf

**Related Programs**    Related programs:  

##                 Related documents            

-        Support          All Small Mentor-Protégé Program Mentor-Protégé Agreement Addendum