alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1

SAMHSA Fiscal Year 2018 –

Non-Competing Continuation Standard Terms and Reporting Requirements

Terms/ 

Reports

Name Language

1 Standard 

Remark 

NonCompeting 

Awards

This Notice of Award (NoA) is issued to inform your organization that the application 

submitted through the (FULL PROGRAM NAME AND ACRONYM) is being continued. 

The (INSERT ACRONYM) Program, as authorized by the (CITE ACT/STATUTE and PUBLIC 

LAW).

2 Standard 

Reporting 

Requirement 

Annual 

Federal

Financial 

Report (FFR)

The Federal Financial Report (FFR) (SF-425) is required on an annual basis and must be 

submitted no later than 90 days after the end of the budget period. The annual FFR 

should reflect only cumulative actual Federal funds authorized and disbursed, any nonFederal matching funds (if identified in the Funding Opportunity Announcement

(FOA)), unliquidated obligations incurred, the unobligated balance of the Federal funds 

for the award, as well as program income generated during the timeframe covered by 

the report. Additional guidance to complete the FFR can be found: 

http://www.samhsa.gov/grants/grants-management/reporting-requirements.

FFR reporting must be entered directly into the eRA Commons system. Instructions 

on how to submit a Federal Financial Report (FFR) via the eRA Commons is available at 

https://www.samhsa.gov/sites/default/files/samhsa-grantee-submit-ffr-10-22-

17.pptx.

3 Standard 

Reporting 

Requirement

Performance 

Progress 

Reports

Submission of a Programmatic Report is due no later than the dates as follows:

1st Report - 

2nd Report - 

3rd Report - 

4th Report - 

Note: Recipients must also comply with the GPRA requirements that include the 

collection and periodic reporting of performance data as specified in the FOA or by the 

Grant Program Official (GPO). This information is needed in order to comply with PL 

102-62, which requires that Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services 

Administration (SAMHSA) report evaluation data to ensure the effectiveness and 

efficiency of its programs. 

Progress reports must be must be submitted through the eRA Commons system. 

Please contact your Government Program Official (GPO) for program specific 

submission information. Additional information on reporting requirements is available 

at https://www.samhsa.gov/grants/grants-management/reporting-requirements. 

4 Standard 

Terms

Reference 

Award 

Standard 

Terms

Reference Grants Awarded in Fiscal Year 2018 Standard Terms and Conditions at 

https://www.samhsa.gov/grants/grants-management/notice-award-noa/standardterms-conditions
 Page 2
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-23-00145-CR

THOMAS EDWARD DEMOPOULOS,

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 355th District Court

of Hood County (CR11818)

August 8, 2024

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Bassel

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was error in two of the trial court’s judgments. The Count Three and Count Four 

judgments are modified to strike the incorporated orders to withdraw $10,000 in

funds. We modify the bill of costs to reduce the “Criminal Fine Fee” from $30,000 to 

$10,000. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial court is affirmed as modified.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Dabney Bassel

 Justice Dabney Bassel
§ 401.84 Hearing procedure. ( a ) *Participation in the hearing.* In any hearing, the person requesting the hearing shall be deemed an interested party and shall be entitled to participate fully in the hearing procedure. In addition, any person whose legal rights may be affected by the decision rendered in a contested case shall be deemed an interested party. Interested parties shall have the right to be represented by counsel, to present evidence and to examine and cross-examine witnesses. In addition to interested parties, any persons having information concerning a contested case or desiring to present comments concerning the subject matter of the Hearing for inclusion in the record may submit a written statement to the Commission. Any interested party may request the right to examine or cross-examine any person who submits a written statement. In the absence of a request for examination of such person, all written statements submitted shall be included within the record and such statements may be relied upon to the extent determined by the Hearing Officer or the Commission.
( b ) *Powers of the Hearing Officer.* The Hearing Officer shall: ( 1 ) Rule upon offers of proof and the admissibility of evidence, regulate the course of the hearings, hold conferences for the settlement or simplification of procedures or issues, and shall schedule submission of documents, briefs and the time for the hearing.
( 2 ) Cause each witness to be sworn or to make affirmation.
( 3 ) Limit the number of times any witness may testify, limit repetitious examination or cross-examination of witnesses or the extent to which corroborative or cumulative testimony shall be accepted.
( 4 ) Exclude irrelevant, immaterial or unduly repetitious evidence, but the interested parties shall not be bound by technical rules of evidence and all relevant evidence of reasonably probative value may be received.
( 5 ) Require briefs and oral arguments to the extent determined necessary which shall be included as part of the record unless otherwise ordered by the Hearing Officer.
Exhibit 18.1

 

July 28, 2006

Board of DirectorsGerber Scientific, Inc.83 Gerber Road WestSouth Windsor, CT 06074

Dear Directors:

We are providing this letter to you for inclusion as an exhibit to your Form 10-K filing pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

We have audited the consolidated financial statements included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2006 and issued our report thereon dated July 28, 2006.  As described in Note 1****to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has notified us of its change in the timing of its annual goodwill impairment test from an approach in which the annual goodwill impairment analysis for each reporting unit was staggered by quarter to an approach where the annual goodwill impairment test for each reporting unit will be performed in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year.  It should be understood that the preferability of one acceptable method of accounting over another for a change in dates of the annual goodwill impairment test has not been addressed in any authoritative accounting literature, and in expressing our concurrence below we have relied on management's determination that this change in accounting principle is preferable.  Based on our reading of management's stated reasons and justification for this change in accounting principle in the Form 10-K, and our discussions with management as to their judgment about the relevant business planning factors relating to the change, we concur with management that such change represents, in the Company's circumstances, the adoption of a preferable accounting principle in conformity with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 20, *Accounting Changes*.

Very truly yours,

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
5600 Fishers Lane • Rockville, MD 20857 

www.samhsa.gov • 1-877-SAMHSA-7 (1-877-726-4727) 

December 27, 2023 

Dear Tribal Leader:

SAMHSA, an operating division of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, leads 

public health and service delivery efforts that promote mental health, prevent substance misuse, 

and provide treatments and supports to foster recovery while ensuring equitable access and better 

outcomes.

This letter serves as notice of the 2024 SAMHSA Tribal Technical Advisory Committee (TTAC) 

Meeting that will take place on February 27, 2024, from approximately 9:00 AM ET to 5:00 PM 

ET in Rockville, MD. The hybrid meeting will be both in-person and online. Members of the 

public are invited to attend virtually and observe the hybrid meeting, but speaking is limited to 

TTAC delegates. The Tribal Caucus will occur prior to the public meeting from 8:00 a.m. – 9:00 

a.m. ET and is only open to elected tribal officials by invitation.

Please register in advance for virtual attendance. Information about the SAMHSA TTAC and the 

agenda for this meeting can be found on the SAMHSA website. During the meeting, SAMHSA 

TTAC delegates and SAMHSA leadership will discuss SAMHSA programs/initiatives and tribal 

behavioral health priorities. Additional information can be found in the Federal Register Notice.

In addition to the meeting, SAMHSA notes that the SAMHSA TTAC is also currently recruiting 

for vacancies in various areas. Review the TTAC Charter for more information on TTAC 

function, activities, and structure. Find additional information on the TTAC Nomination process.

Send all nominations to CAPT Karen Hearod at otap@samhsa.hhs.gov.

Sincerely, 

/Miriam E. Delphin-Rittmon/

Miriam E. Delphin-Rittmon, Ph.D. 

Assistant Secretary for Mental Health 

and Substance Use

Behavioral Health is Essential to Health • Prevention Works • Treatment is Effective • People Recover
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We have issued our report dated September 26, 2005, accompanying the
consolidated financial statements in the Annual Report of Gilman + Ciocia, Inc.
on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2005. We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of
Gilman + Ciocia on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-50089, effective April 14, 1998 and
file No. 333-14915, effective October 28, 1996).


                                                     RADIN, GLASS & CO, LLP

New York, New York
June 14, 2006
#### §§ 115.142-115.143 [Reserved]
§ 105.27 Miscellaneous provisions. ( a ) *Alternate State availability.* ( 1 ) An authorized employer may submit the employee's fingerprints to the SIB of a participating State other than the State of employment—provided it obtains the permission of the accommodating State—if the authorized employer is prevented from submitting an employee's fingerprints because the employee's employment is in: ( i ) A State that does not have an applicable Public Law 92-544 statute authorizing state and national fingerprint-based criminal history checks of prospective and current private security officers and has elected to opt out; or
( ii ) A participating State that has not yet established a process for receiving fingerprints and processing the checks under the regulations in this subpart.
( 2 ) A participating State agreeing to process checks under this subsection will discontinue doing so if thereafter the State of the employee's employment establishes a process State and national fingerprint-based criminal history checks of prospective and current private security officers.
( b ) *FBI fees for national check.* The fee imposed by the FBI to perform a fingerprint-based criminal history record check is that routinely charged for noncriminal justice fingerprint submissions as periodically noticed in the Federal Register.
( c ) *Penalties for misuse.* ( 1 ) In addition to incarceration for a period not to exceed two years, one who knowingly and intentionally misuses information (including a State's notification) received pursuant to the Act may be subject to a fine pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3571.
( 2 ) Consistent with State law, a violation of these regulations may also result in the divestiture of “authorized employer” status, thereby precluding an employer which provides security services from submitting fingerprints for a State and national criminal history record check.
( d ) *Exclusion from coverage.* [Reserved]
59–008 

110TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 110–190 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE BILL (H.R. 2641) MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT, AND RELATED 

AGENCIES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2008, AND 

FOR OTHER PURPOSES 

JUNE 13 (legislative day of June 12), 2007.—Referred to the House Calendar and 

ordered to be printed 

Ms. MATSUI, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 481] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 481, by a non-record vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2641) 

making appropriations for energy and water development and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2008, and 

for other purposes, under an open rule. The resolution provides one 

hour of general debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. 

The resolution waives all points of order against consideration of 

the bill except clauses 9 and 10 of rule XXI. The resolution waives 

points of order against provisions in the bill for failure to comply 

with clause 2 of rule XXI. During consideration of the bill for 

amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority recognition to Members who have preprinted their 

amendments in the Congressional Record. The resolution provides 

one motion to recommit with or without instructions. Finally, the 

resolution permits the Chair, during consideration of the bill in the 

House, to postpone further consideration of the bill to a time designated by the Speaker. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

The waiver of all points of order against consideration of the bill 

(except for clauses 9 and 10 of Rule XXI) includes a waiver of Rule 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with REPORTS
2 

XIII, clause 4(a), requiring a three-day layover of a committee report. 

The waiver of clause 2 of rule XXI (prohibiting unauthorized appropriations or legislative provisions in an appropriations bill) 

against provisions in the bill is included because the bill contains 

unauthorized appropriations and legislative provisions. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with REPORTS
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

JUNE 29, 2005

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 04-15162

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 04-20216-CR-CMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RICARDO NATHANILIAN JOHNSON-CUERVO,

Defendant-Appellant.

__________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Florida

_________________________

(June 29, 2005)

Before ANDERSON, BLACK and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
2

Ricardo Nathanilian Johnson-Cuervo appeals his concurrent sentences for

importation of morphine, 21 U.S.C. §§ 952(a) and 960(b)(3), and possession with

intent to distribute morphine, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(C), contending the

use of an unproven and unadmitted drug quantity to impose sentences under a

mandatory Guidelines scheme violated his Sixth Amendment rights, as set forth in

United States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005).

Because Johnson-Cuervo preserved a Blakely/Booker objection in the

district court, we review the challenge to his sentence de novo. United States v.

Paz, 405 F.3d 946, 948 (11th Cir. 2005). Booker error must be disregarded if it

was harmless. Id. To find harmless error, we must determine the error did not

affect the defendant’s substantial rights. A constitutional error, such as Booker

error, does not affect substantial rights, if it is harmless beyond a reasonable

doubt. Id. This standard is met only where it is clear beyond a reasonable doubt

the error did not contribute to the sentence obtained. The government has the

burden of showing the error did not affect the defendant’s substantial rights. Id.

The Government has not attempted to carry its burden of showing the error

was harmless. Instead, the Government concedes error and joins Johnson-Cuervo 
3

in requesting a remand for resentencing. Accordingly, we vacate JohnsonCuervo’s sentences and remand for resentencing.

VACATED AND REMANDED.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 747 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 747

 To reauthorize the diesel emissions reduction program, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 12, 2019

Mr. Carper (for himself, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Whitehouse, Mr. 
Sullivan, Mr. Booker, Mrs. Capito, Mrs. Gillibrand, Mr. Cramer, and Mr. 
  Van Hollen) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To reauthorize the diesel emissions reduction program, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Diesel Emissions Reduction Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF DIESEL EMISSIONS REDUCTION PROGRAM.

    Section 797(a) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 
16137(a)) is amended by striking ``2016'' and inserting ``2024''.

SEC. 3. RECOGNIZING DIFFERENCES IN DIESEL VEHICLE, ENGINE, EQUIPMENT, 
              AND FLEET USE.

    (a) National Grant, Rebate, and Loan Programs.--Section 
792(c)(4)(D) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 
16132(c)(4)(D)) is amended by inserting ``, recognizing differences in 
typical vehicle, engine, equipment, and fleet use throughout the United 
States'' before the semicolon.
    (b) State Grant, Rebate, and Loan Programs.--Section 793(b)(1) of 
the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 16133(b)(1)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``; and'' and 
        inserting a semicolon; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(D) the recognition, for purposes of implementing 
                this section, of differences in typical vehicle, 
                engine, equipment, and fleet use throughout the United 
                States, including expected useful life; and''.

SEC. 4. REALLOCATION OF UNUSED STATE FUNDS.

    Section 793(c)(2)(C) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 
16133(c)(2)(C)) is amended beginning in the matter preceding clause (i) 
by striking ``to each remaining'' and all that follows through ``this 
paragraph'' in clause (ii) and inserting ``to carry out section 792''.
                                 <all>
```
1 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-30940

Summary Calendar

 

JOSEPH ROUSSELL,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

ED C. DAY, JR.,

Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 00-CV-3429-K

--------------------

March 5, 2002

Before DUHÉ, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

Joseph Roussell, Louisiana prisoner # 119559, was granted a

certificate of appealability to appeal the district court’s

dismissal as time-barred, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d), of his

28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition raising a claim that the reasonable-doubt

jury instruction he received was unconstitutional under Cage v.

Louisiana, 498 U.S. 39 (1990). He essentially argues that his

petition was timely because, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)(C),

the limitations period began to run not from the date his
2

conviction became final but from the date Cage was made retroactive

to cases on collateral review.

Roussell can point to no case, Supreme Court or otherwise,

which has held Cage retroactively applicable to cases on collateral

review, meaning that § 2244(d)(1)(C) is inapplicable. Moreover,

even if Cage had been held to be retroactively applicable, under

United States v. Lopez, 248 F.3d 427, 431-32 (5th Cir.), cert.

denied, 122 S. Ct. 222 (2001), the limitations period began to run

not on the date the retroactivity decision issued but on the date

the Supreme Court announced the Cage rule. Because, like his

conviction, this predated the AEDPA’s enactment date, Roussell had

at most one year from that date, or until April 24, 1997, to file.

See Flanagan v. Johnson, 154 F.3d 196, 199-200 (5th Cir. 1998).

His petition, filed in October 2000, at the earliest, was thus

untimely, even with the benefit of tolling during the pendency of

his relevant state-court pleadings under § 2244(d)(2).

Roussell has not demonstrated that the district court erred in

dismissing his petition as time-barred. Accordingly, the district

court’s judgment is 

AFFIRMED.
### §5204. National Institute of Standards and Technology

In pursuance of the goals of this chapter, the National Institute of Standards and Technology shall promote fundamental research and materials standards to accelerate the use and application of the new superconducting materials, and shall utilize the Superconductivity Center Focusing on Electronic Applications at the National Institute of Standards and Technology in Boulder, Colorado.

(Pub. L. 100–697, §5, Nov. 19, 1988, 102 Stat. 4615.)
### Periodic Maintenance Checklist Description Checked Airframe Check that all the screws on the frame, gimbal and motor mounts are still securely fastened. Check that all the ABS parts are still intact and do not show signs of wear or fatigue, particularly the inner mounts. Check the carbon plates and tubes for wear and damage that would reduce the structural integrity of the frame.

Motors Check that the prop holder is still secure fastened to the motor with all three screws and that the nut and tread that secures the prop is still in good condition. Check that the motor is still securely fastened to the motor mount with all 4 screws. Check that the motor runs smooth when turned by hand and that there is not any play in the bearings. Check that the motors are free of dust and any other foreign particles. Check that the motor windings do not show any damage or bubbling/melting. Also check that the motor wires are not damaged.

Electronics Check that the battery connector is in good condition and that the soldering is still secure. Also make sure the wires are not damaged. Check that the wires between the ESC and the motors are not damaged. Check that all the different electronic modules are still securely fastened. Check the ESC, Gimbal Control Board, Receiver, Flight Controller, GPS/Compass, etc. Check that all the various plugs that connect all the electronics are still securely plugged in. Were possible, check that all the solder joints are still in good condition. Check that all the electronics are free of dust or dirt. Check sensor readings for abnormalities. (Check in Mission Planner, Compass reading, GPS, attitude, etc. See ArduCopter Wiki for more information.)

Radio Check that the control gimbals are free from dust and other particles. Check that the battery is still in good condition. Perform a radio range check. (See radio manual for details)

LiPo Batteries Check that the battery is not punctured or does not have any other physical damage. The battery should also not be swollen at all. Check that all the cells of the battery are balanced. (Within 0.1V of each other) Check that the battery connector is in good condition and that the soldering is still secure. Also make sure the wires are not damaged.

Signature 1 :

Print name : Signature 2 :

Print name :