alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1152. Prohibitions

It is unlawful, except as provided in this chapter or by regulation of the Secretary, for any person or vessel subject to the jurisdiction of the United States to engage in the taking of fur seals in the North Pacific Ocean or on lands or waters under the jurisdiction of the United States, or to use any port or harbor or other place under the jurisdiction of the United States for any purpose connected in any way with such taking, or for any person to transport, import, offer for sale, or possess at any port or place or on any vessel, subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, fur seals or the parts thereof, including, but not limited to, raw, dressed, or dyed fur seal skins, taken contrary to the provisions of this chapter or the Convention, or for any person subject to the jurisdiction of the United States to refuse to permit, except within the Exclusive Economic Zone of the United States, a duly authorized official of Canada, Japan, or Russia to board and search any vessel which is outfitted for the harvesting of living marine resources and which is subject to the jurisdiction of the United States to determine whether such vessel is engaged in sealing contrary to the provisions of said Convention.

(Pub. L. 89–702, title I, §102, Nov. 2, 1966, 80 Stat. 1091; Pub. L. 98–129, §2, Oct. 14, 1983, 97 Stat. 836; Pub. L. 103–199, title VI, §602(2), Dec. 17, 1993, 107 Stat. 2327.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1993—Pub. L. 103–199 substituted "Russia" for "the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics".

1983—Pub. L. 98–129 amended section generally, substituting provisions enumerating the activities prohibited under this chapter, which were previously contained in section 1151 of this title, for provisions authorizing sealing by Aleuts, Eskimos, and Indians. See section 1153 of this title.
### §8131. Cyberpiracy protections for individuals

#### (1) In general

#### (A) Civil liability

Any person who registers a domain name that consists of the name of another living person, or a name substantially and confusingly similar thereto, without that person's consent, with the specific intent to profit from such name by selling the domain name for financial gain to that person or any third party, shall be liable in a civil action by such person.

#### (B) Exception

A person who in good faith registers a domain name consisting of the name of another living person, or a name substantially and confusingly similar thereto, shall not be liable under this paragraph if such name is used in, affiliated with, or related to a work of authorship protected under title 17, including a work made for hire as defined in section 101 of title 17, and if the person registering the domain name is the copyright owner or licensee of the work, the person intends to sell the domain name in conjunction with the lawful exploitation of the work, and such registration is not prohibited by a contract between the registrant and the named person. The exception under this subparagraph shall apply only to a civil action brought under paragraph (1) and shall in no manner limit the protections afforded under the Trademark Act of 1946 (15 U.S.C. 1051 et seq.) or other provision of Federal or State law.

#### (2) Remedies

In any civil action brought under paragraph (1), a court may award injunctive relief, including the forfeiture or cancellation of the domain name or the transfer of the domain name to the plaintiff. The court may also, in its discretion, award costs and attorneys fees to the prevailing party.

#### (3) Definition

In this section, the term "domain name" has the meaning given that term in section 45 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (15 U.S.C. 1127).

#### (4) Effective date

This section shall apply to domain names registered on or after November 29, 1999.

(Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(9) [title III, §3002(b)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–548.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Trademark Act of 1946, referred to in par. (1)(B), is act July 5, 1946, ch. 540, 60 Stat. 427, also popularly known as the Lanham Act, which is classified generally to chapter 22 (§1051 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1051 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 1129 of this title.

Section was enacted as part of the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, and not as part of the Prioritizing Resources and Organization for Intellectual Property Act of 2008, which comprises this chapter.
<PAGE>

32.1     Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
         Officer of Highland Ridge, Inc. pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes
         Oxley Act of 2002


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of HIGHLAND RIDGE (the
"Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Michael
Anthony, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Highland Ridge,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 11, 2009

                                      /s/Michael Anthony
                                      ----------------------
                                      Michael Anthony
                                      Chief Executive Officer

                                      /s/ Michael Anthony
                                      ----------------------
                                      Michael Anthony
                                      Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1258 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1258

  To authorize funds for the payment of salaries and expenses of the 
          Patent and Trademark Office, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 22, 1999

 Mr. Hatch (for himself and Mr. Leahy) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To authorize funds for the payment of salaries and expenses of the 
          Patent and Trademark Office, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Patent Fee Integrity and Innovation 
Protection Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There are authorized to be made available for the payment of 
salaries and necessary expenses of the Patent and Trademark Office in 
fiscal year 2000, $116,000,000 from fees collected in fiscal year 1999 
and such fees as are collected in fiscal year 2000 pursuant to title 
35, United States Code, and the Trademark Act of 1946 (15 U.S.C. 1051 
et seq.), except that the Commissioner is not authorized to charge and 
collect fees to cover the accrued indirect personnel costs associated 
with post-retirement health and life insurance of officers and 
employees of the Patent and Trademark Office other than those charged 
and collected pursuant to title 35, United States Code, and the 
Trademark Act of 1946.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act shall take effect on October 1, 1999.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Granite Cliffs Incorporated,
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"),  the undersigned,  B.
Stephen Bailey,  Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my  knowledge  and
belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 16.54 Employee standards of conduct. Each component shall inform its employees and any contractors involved in developing or maintaining a system of records of the provisions of the Privacy Act, including the Privacy Act's civil liability and criminal penalty provisions. Unless otherwise permitted by law, employees and contractors of the Department shall: ( a ) Collect from individuals only the information that is relevant and necessary to discharge the responsibilities of the Department;
( b ) Collect information about an individual directly from that individual whenever practicable;
( c ) Inform each individual asked to supply information for a record pertaining to that individual of: ( 1 ) The legal authority to collect the information and whether providing it is mandatory or voluntary;
( 2 ) The principal purpose for which the Department intends to use the information;
( 3 ) The routine uses the Department may make of the information; and
( 4 ) The effects on the individual, if any, of not providing the information;
( d ) Ensure that the component maintains no system of records without public notice and that it notifies appropriate Department officials of the existence or development of any system of records that is not the subject of a current or planned public notice;
( e ) Maintain all records that are used by the Department in making any determination about an individual with such accuracy, relevance, timeliness, and completeness as is reasonably necessary to ensure fairness to the individual in the determination;
( f ) Except as to disclosures made to an agency or made under the FOIA, make reasonable efforts, prior to disseminating any record about an individual, to ensure that the record is accurate, relevant, timely, and complete;
( g ) Maintain no record describing how an individual exercises the individual's First Amendment rights, unless maintaining the record is expressly authorized by statute or by the individual about whom the record is maintained, or is pertinent to and within the scope of an authorized law enforcement activity;
( h ) When required by the Privacy Act, maintain an accounting in the specified form of all disclosures of records by the Department to persons, organizations, or agencies;
( i ) Maintain and use records with care to prevent the loss or the unauthorized or inadvertent disclosure of a record to anyone;
( j ) Notify the appropriate Department official of any record that contains information that the Privacy Act does not permit the Department to maintain; and
( k ) Read, acknowledge, and agree to abide by the Department of Justice rules of behavior for accessing, collecting, using, and maintaining Department information.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 862 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                        Calendar No. 54
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 862

  To repeal the sunset for collateral requirements for Small Business 
                     Administration disaster loans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 25, 2019

   Mr. Kennedy (for himself, Mr. Booker, Mr. Rubio, and Mr. Hawley) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
            Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship

                             April 3, 2019

                Reported by Mr. Rubio, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To repeal the sunset for collateral requirements for Small Business 
                     Administration disaster loans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rebuilding Small Businesses After 
Disasters Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF SUNSET FOR COLLATERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SBA DISASTER 
              LOANS.

    Section 2102 of the RISE After Disaster Act of 2015 (Public Law 
114-88; 129 Stat. 690) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(a) In General.--''; and
            (2) by striking subsections (b) and (c).
                                                        Calendar No. 54

116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 862

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

  To repeal the sunset for collateral requirements for Small Business 
                     Administration disaster loans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 3, 2019

                       Reported without amendment
```
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
 
 **CERTIFICATION**
 
  I, Wirt D. Walker III, certify that:
 1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Aviation General, Incorporated and Subsidiaries2.
Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;4.
The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annualreport (the "Evaluation Date"); andc) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluationas of the Evaluation Date;5.
The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and6.
The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
   ****Date: October 1, 2004
By:
/s/ Wirt D. Walker IIIWirt D. Walker IIIDirector. Chairman of the
Board, and Chief Executive Officer
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Document Search 
-  Memorandum of Understanding Between SBA and USDA 

# Memorandum of Understanding between SBA and USDA

## About this document and download

This MOU documents and formalizes ongoing coordination and collaborative efforts between USDA and SBA regarding:
                  - improving investment opportunities in rural areas
                  - examining synergies to streamline and deliver programs
                  - targeting underserved communities
                  - improving innovation for rural technical assistance providers
                  - aiding rural businesses in providing tools to export products around the world

  Download  .pdf
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-15-00281-CR

Pedro P. Morales, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY, 340TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. C-10-0321-SB, HONORABLE MARTIN (BROCK) JONES, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Pedro P.Moraleswas charged with intoxicated assault with a motor vehicle

causing serious bodily injury, a third degree felony. Tex. Penal Code § 49.07. The trial court found

Morales guilty and assessed his punishment at ten years’ confinement in the Institutional Division

of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, along with payment of a fine and restitution. The trial

court, however, suspended Morales’s sentence and placed him on probation for ten years. The State

later moved to revoke Morales’s probation based on seven violations of his probation. After a bench

trial, the trial court found all seven of the State’s allegations true and revoked Morales’s probation.

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a

brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of

Anders v. California by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there

are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967);
Garner v. State, 300 S.W.3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); see also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 86–87 (1988).

Appellant’s counsel has represented to the Court that he has provided copies of the

motion and the brief to the appellant; advised the appellant of his right to examine the appellate

record and file a pro se brief; and provided the appellant with a form motion for pro se access to the

appellate record along with the mailing address of this Court. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313,

319-21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); see also Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; Garner, 300 S.W.3d at 766.

We have not received a pro se brief from the appellant.

We have conducted an independent review of the record, including appellate

counsel’s brief, and find no reversible error. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; Garner, 300 S.W.3d

at 766; Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agree with counsel

that the record presents no arguably meritorious grounds for review and the appeal is frivolous.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

__________________________________________

Scott K. Field, Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Pemberton and Field 

Affirmed

Filed: December 2, 2015

Do Not Publish

2
§ 385.908 Discovery (Rule 908). ( a ) *By petitioner.* In the answer under Rule 906(b)(2) (pleadings), the petitioner may request permission of the presiding officer to conduct discovery, where such discovery: ( 1 ) Relates to new facts or issues raised in accordance with Rule 907(a) (new facts and issues); or
( 2 ) ( i ) Was not permitted in the prior proceedings on the contested order due to erroneous adverse procedural rulings; and
( ii ) Is necessary for a full and true disclosure of the facts.
( b ) *By the Secretary.* In the reply under Rule 906(a)(2) (pleadings), the Secretary may request permission of the presiding officer to conduct discovery where such discovery relates to new facts or issues raised in accordance with Rule 907(b) (new facts and issues).
( c ) *By interveners.* In a motion to intervene under Rule 906(c)(8) (pleadings) an intervener may request permission of the presiding officer to conduct discovery where such discovery: ( 1 ) Relates to new facts or issues raised in accordance with Rule 907(c) (new facts and issues); or
( 2 ) If the intervener participated in the prior proceedings, ( i ) Such discovery was not permitted in prior proceedings on the contested order due to erroneous adverse procedural rulings; and
( ii ) Such discovery is necessary for a full and true disclosure of the facts.
( d ) *Determinations by the presiding officer.* The presiding officer will determine whether to grant or deny, in whole or in part, the requests of the participants for discovery and will set a time limit within which discovery must be conducted.
( e ) *Interrogatories.* In addition to discovery devices applicable to this subpart under other subparts of this part, participants may conduct discovery by means of written interrogatories under conditions determined by the presiding officer.
#### § 430.33 Duration.

The delineation and declaration of the Southeastern Pennsylvania Ground Water Protected Area made pursuant to this regulation, and the requirements established hereby, shall continue until terminated by specific action of the Commission.

[46 FR 24, Jan. 2, 1981. Redesignated at 51 FR 25031, July 10, 1986]