alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

----

----

----

----

| April 30, 2009                                                        | 2.75-to-1  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|
| July 31, 2009                                                         | 2.25-to-1  |
| October 31, 2009                                                      | 2.00-to-1  |
| January 31, 2010                                                      | 2.25-to-1  |
| April 30, 2010                                                        | 2.75-to-1  |
| July 31, 2010 and each trailing  four-quarter period thereafter  | 3.00-to-1  |
| April 30, 2009                                                                             | 3.75-to-1  |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|
| July 31, 2009                                                                              | 3.75-to-1  |
| October 31, 2009                                                                           | 3.75-to-1  |
| January 31, 2010                                                                           | 3.25-to-1  |
| April 30, 2010                                                                             | 3.25-to-1  |
| July 31, 2010 and      each trailing four-quarter      period thereafter    | 3.00-to-1  |

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----
§ 115.71 Criminal and administrative agency investigations. ( a ) When the agency conducts its own investigations into allegations of sexual abuse and sexual harassment, it shall do so promptly, thoroughly, and objectively for all allegations, including third-party and anonymous reports.
( b ) Where sexual abuse is alleged, the agency shall use investigators who have received special training in sexual abuse investigations pursuant to § 115.34.
( c ) Investigators shall gather and preserve direct and circumstantial evidence, including any available physical and DNA evidence and any available electronic monitoring data; shall interview alleged victims, suspected perpetrators, and witnesses; and shall review prior complaints and reports of sexual abuse involving the suspected perpetrator.
( d ) When the quality of evidence appears to support criminal prosecution, the agency shall conduct compelled interviews only after consulting with prosecutors as to whether compelled interviews may be an obstacle for subsequent criminal prosecution.
( e ) The credibility of an alleged victim, suspect, or witness shall be assessed on an individual basis and shall not be determined by the person's status as inmate or staff. No agency shall require an inmate who alleges sexual abuse to submit to a polygraph examination or other truth-telling device as a condition for proceeding with the investigation of such an allegation.
( f ) Administrative investigations: ( 1 ) Shall include an effort to determine whether staff actions or failures to act contributed to the abuse; and
( 2 ) Shall be documented in written reports that include a description of the physical and testimonial evidence, the reasoning behind credibility assessments, and investigative facts and findings.
( g ) Criminal investigations shall be documented in a written report that contains a thorough description of physical, testimonial, and documentary evidence and attaches copies of all documentary evidence where feasible.
( h ) Substantiated allegations of conduct that appears to be criminal shall be referred for prosecution.
( i ) The agency shall retain all written reports referenced in paragraphs (f) and (g) of this section for as long as the alleged abuser is incarcerated or employed by the agency, plus five years.
( j ) The departure of the alleged abuser or victim from the employment or control of the facility or agency shall not provide a basis for terminating an investigation.
( k ) Any State entity or Department of Justice component that conducts such investigations shall do so pursuant to the above requirements.
( l ) When outside agencies investigate sexual abuse, the facility shall cooperate with outside investigators and shall endeavor to remain informed about the progress of the investigation.
**Troubleshooting Tips for the CCP Mobile App and ODCES Users**

To help improve your experience with the app, here are a few helpful tips to resolve many of the difficulties users may encounter: 

1. Make sure your mobile device is not in private browsing mode.

1. Use Google Chrome as your browser for the Online Data Collection and Evaluation System (ODCES) and the Crisis Counseling Assistance and Training Program (CCP) mobile app.

1. Make sure your mobile device is running the most recent version of its operating system.

1. Use a desktop or laptop computer, not a mobile device, to access the ODCES site (https://www.ccpdata.org/ccp2field).  

1. Use a mobile device, not a desktop or laptop computer, to access the CCP mobile app site (https://ccpdata.org/CCPMobile).   

1. Uninstall and reinstall the app on your device.**Before continuing with the steps below, be sure to upload all forms prior to clearing your cache or capture the data via paper forms to ensure that no data is lost:**

5. Clear your cache. Please search the internet for instructions for how to do this on your device if you do not know how. 

5. Remove the CCP mobile app from your device. 

5. Turn off your device. 

5. Power the device back up. 

5. Reinstall the CCP mobile app. 

Check out these additional Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Disaster Technical Assistance Center resources:

· The CCP Mobile Data Collection App: Frequently Asked Questions and the CCP ODCES Job Aid, both of which can be accessed at https://www.samhsa.gov/dtac/ccp-toolkit/ccp-mobile-online-data-collection. Both documents provide more detailed troubleshooting tips and instructions. 

· The CCP training video demonstrating how to use the mobile app.

*Troubleshooting Tips for CCP Mobile App and ODCES Users*
### §1220c–1. Financial assistance to State to prepare transferred ship

#### (a) Assistance authorized

The Secretary, subject to the availability of appropriations, may provide, to any State to which an obsolete ship is transferred under this chapter, financial assistance to prepare the ship for use as an artificial reef, including for—

(1) environmental remediation;

(2) towing; and

(3) sinking.

#### (b) Amount of assistance

The Secretary shall determine the amount of assistance under this section with respect to an obsolete ship based on—

(1) the total amount available for providing assistance under this section;

(2) the benefit achieved by providing assistance for that ship; and

(3) the cost effectiveness of disposing of the ship by transfer under this chapter and provision of assistance under this section, compared to other disposal options for that ship.

#### (c) Terms and conditions

The Secretary—

(1) shall require a State seeking assistance under this section to provide cost data and other information determined by the Secretary to be necessary to justify and document the assistance; and

(2) may require a State receiving such assistance to comply with terms and conditions necessary to protect the environment and the interests of the United States.

#### (d) Limitation

The Secretary may not provide assistance under this section to a foreign country to which an obsolete ship is transferred under this chapter.

(Pub. L. 92–402, §7, as added Pub. L. 107–314, div. C, title XXXV, §3504(a)(1)(B), Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2754; amended Pub. L. 111–84, div. C, title XXXV, §3513(b), Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2724.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 7 of Pub. L. 92–402 was renumbered section 8 and is classified to section 1220d of this title.

#### Amendments

2009—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 111–84 added subsec. (d).
# C_2011120EN.01000502.xml

| 16.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 120/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 120/5

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Rovereto (Italy) lodged on 11 February 2011 — Criminal proceedings against John Austine

(Case C-63/11)

2011/C 120/09

Language of the case: italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale di Rovereto

Party to the main proceedings

Party to the main proceedings

John Austine

Question referred

Question referred

In the light of the principles of sincere cooperation and the effectiveness of directives, are Articles 15 and 16 of Directive 2008/115/EC (1) to be interpreted as precluding a Member State from providing that an illegally staying third country national who fails to cooperate in the administrative return procedure is to be subject to measures involving deprivation of liberty on the basis of measures, other than detention measures, as defined under national law, in the absence of the requirements and safeguards laid down in Articles 15 and 16, on grounds of failure to comply with a removal order issued by the competent administrative authorities in accordance with Article 8(3) of the directive?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2008 L 348, p. 98.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel; RFA-HD-10-006: Developmental Mechanisms of Human Structural Birth Defects P01 Review.                    

*Date:*                         April 7-8, 2011.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 6:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Latham Hotel, 3000 M Street, NW., Washington, DC 20007.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Cathy J. Wedeen, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Division of Scientific Review, OD, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5B01-G, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-1485,                         *wedeenc@csr.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: March 8, 2011.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2011-5797 Filed 3-11-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
EXHIBIT 21

                             LISTING OF SUBSIDIARIES

     There are five active subsidiaries of the Company:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                  Name Under which
Name of Subsidiary                           Jurisdiction of Incorporation    Subsidiary Does Business
<S>     <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>

Bontex S.A.                                  Belgium                                    Same
Bontex Italia S.r.l.                         Italy                                      Same
Bontex, Inc.                                 Virginia                                   Same
Bontex de Mexico                             Mexico                                     Same
GB Bontex Hong Kong Limited                  Hong Kong                                  Same
</TABLE>
#### § 1312.12 Relationship to section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act.

Issuance of a permit in accordance with the Act and this part does not constitute an undertaking requiring compliance with section 106 of the Act of October 15, 1966 (16 U.S.C. 470f). However, the mere issuance of such a permit does not excuse the Federal land manager from compliance with section 106 where otherwise required.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  SBA Leadership 
-  Mina Wales 

#   Mina Wales

Deputy National Ombudsman

Office of the National Ombudsman

            Download high-resolution image          

Mina Wales has 30 years of federal government experience, 28 of those at the SBA. Over the years she has had various roles and responsibilities in different program offices within the SBA, which has given her a depth and breadth of knowledge on how the agency operates and supports our nation’s 30 million small businesses.

Download a high resolution headshot
#### § 12.30 Burden of establishing availability of exemptions.

In all matters pertaining to exemptions, the burden of establishing the availability of the exemption shall rest with the person for whose benefit the exemption is claimed.
# “DIAL DOWN” EXERCISE

Often, when we are upset, our emotions are very “high” or “intense.”  You might imagine this as a dial set on “high.”
**Normal**

**High**

**Low**

****

1. When you are trying to “regulate” your emotions, or “turn your emotions down,” think of the dial and where “normal” is for you. 

2. Then imagine yourself, “dialing down” from high emotions to normal or low intensity emotions. 

3. While you are doing this, pay attention to your breathing, and try to take slow, deep breaths as a way to help you “dial down.”

****

4. And finally, think about an image, a picture or a person that makes you feel calm or happy and try to hold onto that image until you feel in control of your emotions.

****

# image2.gif

# image3.gif

# image4.jpeg

# image1.gif
**VERMONT SBIRT TRAINING COLLABORATIVE: Changing Care through Systems Redesign and Team Based Training**

The University of Vermont SBIRT Training Collaborative (VSTC) brings together graduate students from across three different colleges and five different departments at UVM. By 2016, VSTC proposes to train 225 students between the Family Medicine and Internal Medicine residencies, the Department of Social Work, the College of Nursing, and the Counseling Program, in a team-based care model of evidence supported SBIRT interventions with a focus on problem alcohol use, drug use and co morbid medical and behavioral issues. The program will model team-based care with team-based learning through multiple training modalities, including didactic sessions, simulated patients, in vivo practice, and individual and group case coaching. Alongside the established SBIRT curriculum, the VSTC will train in integrated primary care behavioral health and practice-based leadership skills. The training program will last 29 months and be integrated into the curricula of each discipline at the conclusion of the grant period. Training will be disseminated to multiple venues around the state, and the VSTC proposes to use the project infrastructure in developing a Vermont behavioral workforce capacity for emerging patient centered medical homes. This project is supported by CSAT and SAMHSA. For more information contact Jonathan van Luling Project Coordinator at jonathan.van-luling@med.uvm.edu or Rodger Kessler Ph.D. Principal Inverstigator at Rodger.Kessler@med.uvm.edu
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ACCOMPANYING PERIODIC REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350)



I, Patricia Costante, the Chief Executive Officer of The MIIX Group,
Incorporated, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The MIIX Group, Incorporated
for the period ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report"), which this certification
accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of The MIIX Group,
Incorporated.



                                                     /s/ Patricia A. Costante
                                                     ------------------------
                                                     Patricia A. Costante
                                                     Chief Executive Officer


Dated:   May 15, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to The MIIX Group, Incorporated and will be retained by The MIIX Group,
Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 26,
2009 of the Company, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Deborah H. MerrillDeborah H. MerrillVice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer  22
###### Editorial Note on Part 113

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 113 appear at 79 FR 55969, Sept. 18, 2014.

#### § 113.104 Leptospira Grippotyphosa Bacterin.

Leptospira Grippotyphosa Bacterin shall be produced from a culture of *Leptospira grippotyphosa* which has been inactivated and is nontoxic. Each serial of biological product containing *Leptospira grippotyphosa* fraction shall meet the applicable requirements in § 113.100 and shall be tested for purity, safety, and potency as prescribed in this section. A serial found unsatisfactory by any prescribed test shall not be released.

(a) *Purity test.* Final container samples of completed product from each serial and each subserial shall be tested for viable bacteria and fungi as provided in § 113.26.

(b) *Safety test.* Bulk or final container samples of completed product from each serial shall be tested for safety as provided in § 113.38.

(c) *Potency test.* Bulk or final container samples of completed product shall be diluted with physiological saline so that each 0.25 ml contains not more than 1/800th of the dose recommended on the label and shall be tested for potency, using the two-stage test provided in this paragraph.

(1) *Vaccinates.* Inject each of at least 10 but not more than 12 young adult hamsters, each weighing 50 to 90 grams, with 0.25 ml of the diluted bacterin either subcutaneously or intramuscularly, in accordance with the label recommendations for use.

(2) *Controls.* Retain at least 10 but not more than 12 additional hamsters from the same group as unvaccinated controls.

(3) *Challenge.* From 14 to 18 days postvaccination, challenge each of 10 vaccinates and each of 10 controls intraperitoneally with a suspension of virulent *Leptospira grippotyphosa* organisms, using a dose of 10-10,000 hamster LD50 as determined by titration.

(4) *Post-challenge period.* Observe the vaccinates and controls for 14 days post-challenge and record all deaths. If eight or more controls die of leptospirosis, the test is valid and the results shall be evaluated according to the following table:

| Stage | Number of vaccinates | Dead hamsters for acceptance | Dead hamsters for rejection |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 10 | 2 or less | 5 or more. |
| 2 | 20 | 5 or less | 6 or more. |

Cumulative Totals

(5) If three or four vaccinates die in the first stage, the second stage shall be conducted in a manner identical to the first stage.

(6) If the second stage is used, each serial shall be evaluated according to the second part of the table. On the basis of cumulative results, each serial shall either pass or fail.

[40 FR 17003, Apr. 16, 1975, as amended at 40 FR 23989, June 4, 1975; 45 FR 40100, June 13, 1980. Redesignated at 55 FR 35562, Aug. 31, 1990, as amended at 56 FR 66785, Dec. 26, 1991]
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 21, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-20444

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

STEVEN D. LUCK,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:04-CR-115-ALL

--------------------

Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Steven D. Luck appeals his sentence for bank robbery in

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). Luck’s offenses occurred prior

to the decision in United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005),

and he was sentenced after Booker was decided. Luck argues that,

although he is entitled to retroactive application of Booker’s

Sixth Amendment holding, the remedial portion of Booker’s

holding, which made the Sentencing Guidelines advisory, may not

be applied in his case without violating the Due Process and

Ex Post Facto Clauses of the Constitution. He thus argues that
No. 05-20444

-2-

the district court should have applied the Guidelines as

mandatory in his case but should not have enhanced his sentence

based on facts that were not charged in the superceding

information and were neither admitted by him nor found by a jury

beyond a reasonable doubt. As Luck concedes, this argument is

foreclosed. See United States v. Austin, 432 F.3d 598, 599-600

(5th Cir. 2005); United States v. Scroggins, 411 F.3d 572, 575-76

(5th Cir. 2005). He has raised the issue to preserve it for

further review. Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is

AFFIRMED.