alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 19,700.

#### Joseph W. Malouff *v.*Board of County Commissioners of Rio Grande County.

(370 P. [2d] 161)

Decided April 2, 1962.

Mr. Gail F. Ouren, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Richard L. Bloss, Jr., Mr. J. Fred Schneider, Mr. Ronald Lee Cooke, for defendant in error.

*In Department.*

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Moore.

■ We will refer to plaintiff in error by name and to defendant in error as the board.

*12The cause is here on writ of error to review a judgment of the trial court upholding denial of an application for a package liquor store license. Malouff applied to the board for a license to conduct a liquor outlet in Lariat, a community adjacent to the town of Monte Vista in Rio Grande county. In addition to the immediate area, Malouff contended that Sunnyside Addition to Monte Vista, which is contiguous to Lariat, would be served by granting the license.

The final judgment entered by the trial court included the following:

“IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED by the Court that the Judgment and Decree be amended and clarified to specifically provide that a motion for a new trial is dispensed with, and the same is hereby done;

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the cost of the preparation of the transcript of hearing before the Board of County Commissioners in this cause shall be paid by the defendant, Rio Grande County Board of County Commissioners, upon presentation of bill for the same together with certified copy of this order to said Board of County Commissioners.”

Questions to be Determined.

First. *Was the action of the board in denying Malouff s application an arbitrary or capricious exercise of discretion?*

This question is answered in the negative. It appears that 239 persons signed petitions favoring issuance of the license while 210 persons signed petitions in opposition thereto, about one-half of whom lived in Lariat or Sunnyside Addition. The record discloses that there are two package drugstore outlets, and two licensed establishments serving liquor by the drink, within one-half to three-fourths of a mile from the business establishment operated by Malouff.

We cannot say that under the facts and circumstances shown by the record before us there was any abuse of *13discretion on the part of the board. The opinions of this court in *Brentwood Liquors, Inc., v. Schooley,*147 Colo. 324, 363 P. (2d) 670, and *Schooley v. Steinberg,*148 Colo. 222, 365 P. (2d) 245, and cases there cited, are applicable to the instant action.

Second. *Did the trial court err in assessing against the county the expense involved in preparing the transcript of the hearing before the board?*

This question is answered in the negative. Suffice it to say in this connection that the licensing authority is obligated in certiorari to forward the record to the reviewing tribunal. The expense thus involved is not taxable as costs.

The judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Sutton and Mr. Justice Frantz concur.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 12, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 2151]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-596]



[[Page 2151]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Sunshine Act; Meeting Notice; Matter To Be Deleted From the 
Agenda of a Previously Announced Agency Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 11:30 a.m., Thursday, January 13, 2011.

PLACE: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, 
VA 22314-3428.

STATUS: Closed.

1. MATTER TO BE DELETED: Insurance Appeals. Closed pursuant to 
exemptions (4), (6) and (7).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board, 
Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Mary Rupp,
Board Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-596 Filed 1-10-11; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE P
# C_2011232EN.01004001.xml

| 6.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 232/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 232/40

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 28 June 2011 — De Nicola v European Investment Bank

(Case F-49/10) (1)

(Staff case - Staff of the European Investment Bank - Sickness insurance - Refusal to reimburse medical expenses - Request for independent doctor to be designated - Reasonable period of time)

(2011/C 232/69)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Carlo De Nicola (Strassen, Luxembourg) (represented by L. Isola, avocat)

Defendant: European Investment Bank (represented by T. Gilliams and F. Martin, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the defendant’s decision not to reimburse sessions of laser therapy.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the parties to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the parties to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 221 of 14.8.10, p. 61.

---
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 51 (Wednesday, March 16, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 14458]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6115]



[[Page 14458]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

March 10, 2011.
    The Department of the Treasury will submit the following public 
information collection requirements to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 on or 
after the date of publication of this notice. A copy of the submissions 
may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau Clearance Officer 
listed. Comments regarding these information collections should be 
addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the Treasury PRA Clearance 
Officer, Department of the Treasury, 1750 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 
Suite 11010, Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before April 15, 2011 
to be assured of consideration.

Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB)

    OMB Number: 1513-0044.
    Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection.
    Title: Notice of Change in Status of Plant.
    Abstract: The notice is necessary to show the use of the distilled 
spirits plant (DSP) premises for other activities or by alternating 
proprietors. It describes proprietor's use of plant premises and other 
information to show that the change in plant status is in conformity 
with laws and regulations.
    Respondents: Private Sector: Businesses or other for-profits.
    Estimated Total Burden Hours: 500 hours.
    OMB Number: 1513-0050.
    Type of Review: Extension without change of a currently approved 
collection.
    Title: Tax Deferral Bond--Distilled Spirits (Puerto Rico).
    Form: TTB F 5110.50.
    Abstract: TTB F 5110.50 is the bond to secure payment of excise 
taxes on distilled spirits shipped from Puerto Rico to the U.S. on 
deferral of the tax. The form identifies the principal, the surety, 
purpose of bond, and allocation of the penal sum among the principal's 
locations.
    Respondents: Private Sector: Businesses or other for-profits.
    Estimated Total Burden Hours: 10 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Gerald Isenberg, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and 
Trade Bureau, Room 200 East, 1310 G. Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005; 
(202) 453-2097.
    OMB Reviewer: Shagufta Ahmed, Office of Management and Budget, New 
Executive Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503; (202) 395-
7873.

Dawn D. Wolfgang,
Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-6115 Filed 3-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-31-P
### §80a–63. Accounts and records

#### (a) Exception for business development company

Notwithstanding the exemption set forth in section 80a–6(f) of this title, section 80a–30 of this title shall apply to a business development company to the same extent as if it were a registered closed-end investment company, except that the reference to the financial statements required to be filed pursuant to section 80a–29 of this title shall be construed to refer to the financial statements required to be filed by such business development company pursuant to section 78m of this title.

#### (b) Risk factors statement; availability

(1) In addition to the requirements of subsection (a), a business development company shall file with the Commission and supply annually to its shareholders a written statement, in such form and manner as the Commission may, by rule, prescribe, describing the risk factors involved in an investment in the securities of a business development company due to the nature of such company's investment portfolio and capital structure, and shall supply copies of such statement to any registered broker or dealer upon request.

(2) If the Commission finds it is necessary or appropriate in the public interest and consistent with the protection of investors and the purposes fairly intended by the policy and provisions of this subchapter, the Commission may also require, by rule, any person who, acting as principal or agent, sells a security of a business development company to inform the purchaser of such securities, at or before the time of sale, of the existence of the risk statement prepared by such business development company pursuant to this subsection, and make such risk statement available on request. The Commission, in making such rules and regulations, shall consider, among other matters, whether any such rule or regulation would impose any unreasonable burdens on such brokers or dealers or unreasonably impair the maintenance of fair and orderly markets.

(Aug. 22, 1940, ch. 686, title I, §64, as added Pub. L. 96–477, title I §105, Oct. 21, 1980, 94 Stat. 2289; amended Pub. L. 104–290, title V, §507, Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3446.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 104–290 inserted "and capital structure" after "portfolio".
### §80b–18b. Custody of client accounts

An investment adviser registered under this subchapter shall take such steps to safeguard client assets over which such adviser has custody, including, without limitation, verification of such assets by an independent public accountant, as the Commission may, by rule, prescribe.

(Aug. 22, 1940, ch. 686, title II, §223, as added Pub. L. 111–203, title IV, §411, July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 1577.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 1 year after July 21, 2010, except that any investment adviser may, at the discretion of the investment adviser, register with the Commission under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 during that 1-year period, subject to the rules of the Commission, and except as otherwise provided, see section 419 of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as an Effective Date of 2010 Amendment note under section 80b–2 of this title.
Parraguirre 

2 

ENUNE 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

EIMEMMEMO kaillaiNCM 

of this appeal. Cause appearing, we 

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 1 

X2-42 ,J. 

Hardesty 

cc: Hon. Valorie J. Vega, District Judge 

Clark County Public Defender 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

Quintay Liner 

1Because no remittitur will issue in this matter, see NRAP 42(b), the 

one-year period for filing a post-conviction habeas corpus petition under 

NRS 34.726(1) shall commence to run from the date of this order.
§ 115.63 Reporting to other confinement facilities. ( a ) Upon receiving an allegation that an inmate was sexually abused while confined at another facility, the head of the facility that received the allegation shall notify the head of the facility or appropriate office of the agency where the alleged abuse occurred.
( b ) Such notification shall be provided as soon as possible, but no later than 72 hours after receiving the allegation.
( c ) The agency shall document that it has provided such notification.
( d ) The facility head or agency office that receives such notification shall ensure that the allegation is investigated in accordance with these standards.
The HONORABLE JOHN C. GODBOLD, United States Circuit Judge for the *

Eleventh Circuit, sitting by designation.

The HONORABLE RICHARD G. KOPF, United States District Judge for the 1

District of Nebraska, who adopted the recommendation of the HONORABLE DAVID

L. PIESTER, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Nebraska.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-1687

___________

United States of America, *

*

Plaintiff - Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Nebraska.

Frank T. Dovidio, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Defendant - Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: June 9, 1998

Filed: July 16, 1998 

___________

Before LOKEN, GODBOLD, and HEANEY, Circuit Judges. *

___________

PER CURIAM.

Frank T. Dovidio appeals his conviction for possession with intent to distribute

marijuana, arguing the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress 609

1

pounds of marijuana hidden in the rear of Dovidio’s van. The van was stopped after

sunset for driving with a broken headlight. State Patrol Officer Dale Fahnholz checked
-2-

Dovidio’s Missouri driver’s license and learned of a prior drug arrest or conviction.

Fahnholz called for back-up and sought Dovidio’s consent to search the van. When

additional officers arrived, Dovidio refused to consent, but Fahnholz smelled marijuana

through the van’s open window and decided to search the van. While placing Dovidio

in Fahnholz’s patrol car, the officers were advised that Dovidio’s New Jersey driver’s

license had been suspended. They arrested Dovidio for driving on a suspended license

and discovered the marijuana during a subsequent inventory search of the van.

Dovidio argues his arrest and the subsequent search were unlawful because

Officer Fahnholz knew Dovidio had a valid Missouri driver’s license. The district

court rejected this contention because Fahnholz acquired probable cause to conduct a

warrantless search of the van when he smelled marijuana. See United States v. Caves,

890 F.2d 87, 90-91 (8th Cir. 1989). Therefore, discovery of the marijuana was

inevitable, and the marijuana need not be suppressed even if Dovidio was unlawfully

arrested. See Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431, 444 (1984). Dovidio argues the district

court’s finding that Fahnholz smelled marijuana from outside the van is clearly

erroneous because Fahnholz would have immediately arrested Dovidio, would have

told other officers of the odor, and would not have bothered to ask for consent to search

had he in fact smelled the large quantity of marijuana wrapped and hidden in the rear

of the van. However, as Officer Fahnholz’s testimony was neither internally

inconsistent nor contradicted by extrinsic evidence, Dovidio has not persuaded us this

credibility finding was clear error. See United States v. Galvan, 953 F.2d 1098, 1101

(8th Cir. 1992). Accordingly, we affirm.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
### SUBCHAPTER CXXXII—MOUNT HOOD NATIONAL RECREATION AREA
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 646 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 646

   To amend title 10, United States Code, to require a full military 
 honors ceremony for certain deceased veterans, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 5, 2019

  Mr. Cotton (for himself, Ms. Hassan, and Ms. Warren) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                           Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 10, United States Code, to require a full military 
 honors ceremony for certain deceased veterans, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Full Military Honors Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. FULL MILITARY HONORS CEREMONY FOR CERTAIN VETERANS.

    Section 1491(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
    ``(3) The Secretary concerned shall provide full military honors 
(as determined by the Secretary concerned) for the funeral of a veteran 
who--
            ``(A) is first interred or first inurned in Arlington 
        National Cemetery on or after the date of the enactment of the 
        Full Military Honors Act of 2019;
            ``(B) was awarded the medal of honor or the prisoner-of-war 
        medal; and
            ``(C) is not entitled to full military honors by the grade 
        of that veteran.''.
                                 <all>
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Inicio 
-  Programas de Financiamiento 
-  Préstamos 
-  Microcréditos 

## Section navigation

-  Préstamos    -  Efectuar un pago a la SBA 
  -  Préstamos 7(a) 
  -  Préstamos 504 
  -  Microcréditos      -  Lista de microprestamistas 
  -  Lender Match 
  -  Opciones de asistencia por COVID-19 
-  Capital de inversión 
-  Asistencia por desastres 
-  Las fianzas de garantía 
-  Subvenciones 

# Microcréditos

----

## Contenido

----

## ¿Qué es un microcrédito?

El programa de micropréstamos ofrece préstamos de hasta $50,000 para ayudar a las pequeñas empresas y a ciertas guarderías sin fines de lucro a iniciar y ampliar sus actividades. El microcrédito promedio es de unos $13,000. 

La Agencia Federal de Pequeños Negocios (SBA, por sus siglas en inglés) proporciona fondos a prestamistas intermediarios especialmente designados, que son organizaciones comunitarias sin fines de lucro con experiencia en préstamos, así como en administración y asistencia técnica. Estos intermediarios administran el programa de microcréditos para prestatarios elegibles. 

## ¿Soy elegible?

Cada prestamista intermediario tiene sus propios requisitos de préstamo y crédito. Por lo general, los intermediarios requieren algún tipo de garantía, así como la garantía personal del propietario del negocio. 

## ¿Cómo utilizo un microcrédito?

Los micropréstamos **pueden utilizarse **para una variedad de propósitos que ayudan a las pequeñas empresas a expandirse. Úselos cuando necesite menos de $50,000 dólares para reconstruir, reabrir, reparar, mejorar o perfeccionar su pequeña empresa. 

Algunos ejemplos son: 
                  - Capital de trabajo 
                  - Inventario 
                  - Suministros 
                  - Muebles 
                  - Instalaciones 
                  - Maquinaria 
                  - Equipo 

Los fondos de un microcrédito de la SBA **no pueden utilizarse** para pagar deudas existentes o para comprar bienes raíces. 

## ¿Qué necesito para solicitarlo?

Los microcréditos están disponibles a través de ciertas organizaciones comunitarias sin fines de lucro que tienen experiencia en la concesión de préstamos y la asistencia en la administración de empresas. Los requisitos individuales pueden variar. 

Para solicitar un microcrédito, trabaje con un intermediario aprobado por la SBA en su área. Los prestamistas aprobados por la SBA toman todas las decisiones de crédito y establecen todos los términos de su microcrédito. 

##           Contacte a un intermediario        

----

Encuentre prestamistas intermediarios autorizados que participen en el programa de microcréditos de la SBA. Búsqueda y resultados disponibles solo en inglés.

Encuentre microprestamistas

## ¿Cómo puedo pagar mi microcrédito?

Los términos de pago de los préstamos varían según varios factores: 

## Prestatarios actuales

Si necesita ayuda con el saldo de su cuenta, la fecha de vencimiento o cualquier otra pregunta sobre los detalles de su préstamo, póngase en contacto directamente con su prestamista o con el centro de servicios de préstamos de la SBA (solo en inglés) que aparece en su estado de cuenta.
#   Behavioral Health Barometer: New Mexico, Volume 6

Behavioral Health Barometer: New Mexico, Volume 6

National Survey on Drug Use and Health

### Part of Collection:

Behavioral Health Barometer: State Barometers, Volume 6

                        -  View/Download Files 
                        -  Other Related Reports 
                        -  Report Resources 

### View/Download Files

                                    - NewMexico-BH-Barometer_Volume6(pdf | 576.28 KB)

### Other Related Reports

Behavioral Health Barometer: Alabama, Volume 6

Collected Date: 2012-2019 | Published Date: December 28, 2020 | Type: National Survey on Drug Use and Health

Behavioral Health Barometer: Alaska, Volume 6

Collected Date: 2012-2019 | Published Date: December 28, 2020 | Type: National Survey on Drug Use and Health

Behavioral Health Barometer: Arizona, Volume 6

Collected Date: 2012-2019 | Published Date: December 28, 2020 | Type: National Survey on Drug Use and Health

Behavioral Health Barometer: Arkansas, Volume 6

Collected Date: 2012-2019 | Published Date: December 28, 2020 | Type: National Survey on Drug Use and Health

Behavioral Health Barometer: California, Volume 6

Collected Date: 2012-2019 | Published Date: December 28, 2020 | Type: National Survey on Drug Use and Health

Behavioral Health Barometer: Colorado, Volume 6

Collected Date: 2012-2019 | Published Date: December 28, 2020 | Type: National Survey on Drug Use and Health

Behavioral Health Barometer: Connecticut, Volume 6

Collected Date: 2012-2019 | Published Date: December 28, 2020 | Type: National Survey on Drug Use and Health

Behavioral Health Barometer: Delaware, Volume 6

Collected Date: 2012-2019 | Published Date: December 28, 2020 | Type: National Survey on Drug Use and Health

Behavioral Health Barometer: District of Columbia, Volume 6

Collected Date: 2012-2019 | Published Date: December 28, 2020 | Type: National Survey on Drug Use and Health

Behavioral Health Barometer: Florida, Volume 6

Collected Date: 2012-2019 | Published Date: December 28, 2020 | Type: National Survey on Drug Use and Health

#### Pagination

-  Current page1 
-  Page2 
-  Page3 
-  Page4 
-  Page5 
-  Next pageNext 

### Report Resources

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Data Archive (SAMHDA)'s page about NSDUH.

 < Back to Main content
### §1523. Tax status of gifts and bequests of property

For the purpose of Federal income, estate, and gift taxes, property accepted under section 1522 of this title shall be considered as a gift or bequest to or for the use of the United States.

(Pub. L. 88–611, §2, Oct. 2, 1964, 78 Stat. 991.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 608b of Title 5 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, by Pub. L. 89–554, §1, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 378.