alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

                                                                      Exhibit 23

                         **Consent of Independent Auditors**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No.  333-62844)  pertaining to the Restated  Airport Systems  International,
Inc. 1991 Stock Option Plan of Elecsys  Corporation  (formerly  Airport  Systems
International,  Inc.) of our report  dated June 20,  2003,  with  respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Elecsys Corporation included in this Annual
Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended April 30, 2003.

                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Kansas City, Missouri
July 22, 2003
```
**UN PUBLISHED**  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 6412** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. PIOQUINTO PENALOZA

- BANOS, a/k/a Jose Luis Banos Aydaya, a/k/a Jose Luis Banos, a/k/a Daniel Banos Andaya, a/k/a Pioquinto Banos, a/k/a Michael Burciaga, a/k/a Pioquinto Banos

- Andalla , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro
. William L. Osteen, Jr. , District Judge. ( 1:06

- cr - 00434

- WO

- 2 ; 1:08

- cv - 00534

- WO

- WWD )

Submitted : June 17, 2010 Decided: June 28, 2010

Before MOTZ and KING , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Pioquinto Penaloza

- Banos, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Jane Hairston, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Pioquinto Penaloza

- Banos seeks to appeal the district court’s order accep ting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2010) motion , and its subsequent order denying reconsideration
. The order s are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate o f appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Penaloza

- Banos has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appea l. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 15.17 Final determination. ( a ) In hearings conducted under § 15.14, the adjudicating official shall, subject to subsection (d), make the final determination on the basis of the certified record, findings, conclusions, and recommendations presented by the administrative law judge.
( b ) Prior to making a final determination, the adjudicating official shall give the parties an opportunity to submit the following, within thirty days after the submission of the administrative law judge's recommendations: ( 1 ) Proposed findings and determinations;
( 2 ) Exceptions to the recommendations of the administrative law judge;
( 3 ) Supporting reasons for the exceptions or proposed findings or determinations; and
( 4 ) Final briefs summarizing the arguments presented at the hearing.
( c ) The adjudicating official shall, within a reasonable time after receiving the parties' submissions, consult with the Secretary and then make a final determination. Copies of the final determination shall be served upon each party to the proceeding. Subject to paragraph (d) of this section, the final determination made by the adjudicating official under this rule shall constitute the final agency action.
( d ) Within 30 days of any final determination made by the adjudicating official, the Attorney General may exercise discretion to review the final determination. In the event the Attorney General exercises discretion to review a decision, the Attorney General's final determination shall constitute the final agency action.
CS 315446-C 03/16/2020 

了解冠状病毒疾病 2019 (COVID-19) 有关的事实,帮助遏制谣言的传播。

事实

1

完成隔离或从隔离中解除的人不会

对其他人构成感染风险。

事实

5 了解下列体征和症状有助

于遏制 COVID-19:

事实

4

您可以通过做一些简单的

事情来帮助自己和他人保持

健康。

事实

2

无论是何种族或族群,任何人均有

可能感染。

• 发热

• 咳嗽

• 呼吸困难

如果您符合以下描述,请就医,

• 出现症状

并且

• 与确诊 COVID-19 的人密切接触

或如果您居住在或最近曾到过

COVID-19 正在传播的地区。

有关最新信息,请访问美国疾病控制和预防中心

(CDC)的冠状病毒疾病 2019 网页。

对于大多数人来说,诱发 COVID-19 

的病毒引起重症的直接风险被认为

很低。

对 COVID-19 的恐惧和焦虑会让人们逃避或排斥

他人,即使他们并没有传播病毒的风险。

老年人和患有严重基础疾病的任何年龄的人,

可能会因 COVID-19 导致更严重并发症的风险

更高。

• 用肥皂和水洗手至少 20 秒,特别是

在擤鼻涕、咳嗽或打喷嚏后;去洗手

间;以及吃饭或做饭前。

• 避免用未清洗过的手触碰眼睛、鼻子

和嘴巴。

• 生病时待在家里。

• 咳嗽或打喷嚏时用纸巾遮住,然后将

纸巾丢进垃圾里。

事实

3

cdc.gov/COVID19-ch

分享有关 COVID-19 的事实
EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gouverneur Bancorp Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
F. Bennett, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes -Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.


May 12, 2003                       By: /s/ ROBERT J. TWYMAN
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Robert J. Twyman
                                      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### § 418.1 [Reserved]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

March 20, 2013

s0313

Order 

March 20, 2013

144806

JACQUELYN ROBBINS,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 144806

COA: 300842

Oakland CC: 2009-106178-NO

VILLAGE CREST CONDOMINIUM

ASSOCIATION,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 7, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in 

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and 

we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Hoffner v 

Lanctoe, 492 Mich 450 (2012).
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6550

CARL MASON MANESS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WALLACE THOMPSON HOSPITAL,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-98-358-7-20AK)

Submitted: June 18, 1998 Decided: July 9, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carl Mason Maness, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Carl Mason Maness appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint without prejudice.

Maness’ case was referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1994). The magistrate judge recommended that

relief be denied and advised that failure to file timely objections

to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district

court order based upon the recommendation. Not having received

objections by the end of prescribed period, the district court

adopted the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and dismissed the action without prejudice.

Three days after the entry of judgment, Maness filed objections to the report. Because these objections were postmarked within the objection period, we construe them as timely under Houston

v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988). We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. Maness v. Wallace Thompson

Hospital, No. CA-98-358-7-20AK (D.S.C. Mar. 20, 1998). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 11207 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

− Appellee ,

v ersus
MANUEL SALAS

- PEREZ , Defendant

− Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas No. 3:17

- CR

- 94

- 1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Manuel Salas

- Perez

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 18, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-11207 Document: 00514922166 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/18/2019No. 18

- 11207

2 has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Salas

- Perez h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the
motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from f urther responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 18-11207 Document: 00514922166 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/18/2019
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1250,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with thequarterly report of Power3 Medical Products, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven B. Rash,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

The Report fully compiles withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| September 9,  2005 | /s/Steven B.  Rash                         |   |
|--------------------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|               | Steven B.  Rash                            |
|               |                                       |
|               |  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|               |  Power3 Medical Products, Inc.        |

 

1

----
# C_2012303EN.01000603.xml

| 6.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/6

---

Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 June 2012 — TofuTown.com GmbH; other parties to the proceedings: Meica Ammerländische Fleischwarenfabrik Fritz Meinen GmbH & Co. KG, Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(Case C-599/11 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure - Community trade mark - Application for registration of the word sign ‘TOFUKING’ - Opposition by the proprietor of the trade mark Curry King - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 8(1)(b) - Likelihood of confusion - Degree of similarity)

2012/C 303/12

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellant: TofuTown.com GmbH (represented by: B. Krause, Rechtsanwältin)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Meica Ammerländische Fleischwarenfabrik Fritz Meinen GmbH & Co. KG (represented by: S. Russlies, Rechtsanwalt), Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, Agent)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 20 September 2011 in Case T-99/10 Meica v OHIM — TofuTown.com (TOFUKING), in which the General Court annulled the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 7 January 2010 (Case R 63/2009-4) concerning opposition proceedings between Meica Ammerländische Fleischwarenfabrik Fritz Meinen GmbH & Co. KG and TofuTown.com GmbH — Likelihood of confusion

Meica

OHIM

TofuTown.com

TOFUKING

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders TofuTown.com GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Meica Ammerländische Fleischwarenfabrik Fritz Meinen GmbH & Co. KG; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders TofuTown.com GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Meica Ammerländische Fleischwarenfabrik Fritz Meinen GmbH & Co. KG;

| 3. | Orders the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 133, 5.5.2012.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         99,149
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  528,350
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               627,499
<PP&E>                                         1,159,823
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (162,696)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,507,400
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    100,000
<COMMON>                                       4,604,305
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,466,100)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,507,400
<SALES>                                        54,088
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               54,104
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               293,666
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (239,562)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (239,562)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (239,562)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.01)



</TABLE>
#### § 367.4118 Account 411.10, Accretion expense.

This account must be charged for accretion expense on the liabilities associated with asset retirement obligations included in account 230, Asset retirement obligations (§ 367.2300), related to service company property.
§ 16.2 Proactive disclosure of Department records. Records that are required by the FOIA to be made available for public inspection in an electronic format may be accessed through the Department's Web site at *http://justice.gov/oip/04_2.html .* Each component is responsible for determining which of its records are required to be made publicly available, as well as identifying additional records of interest to the public that are appropriate for public disclosure, and for posting and indexing such records. Each component shall ensure that its Web site of posted records and indices is reviewed and updated on an ongoing basis. Each component has a FOIA Public Liaison who can assist individuals in locating records particular to a component. A list of the Department's FOIA Public Liaisons is available at *http://www.justice.gov/oip/foiacontact/index-list.html .* [AG Order No. 3517-2015, 80 FR 18106, Apr. 3, 2015, as amended by AG Order 3803-2016, 82 FR 727, Jan. 4, 2017]
#### § 17.43 Reinvestigation requirements.

Employees who are eligible for access to classified information shall be subject to periodic reinvestigations and may also be reinvestigated if, at any time, there is reason to believe that they may no longer meet the standards for access.
### SUBCHAPTER CXLIII—ALABAMA HILLS NATIONAL SCENIC AREA
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Find Upcoming Events 
-  Smartphone Photography For Entrepreneurs 

# Smartphone Photography for Entrepreneurs

###  Date and time 

Monday, April 15, 20249:00- 10:00 a.m. EDT

###           Location        

SBDC Brockport161 Chestnut StreetRochester, NY14604
View Map

### Organizer

                    Small Business Development Center - Brockportsbdc@brockport.edu

###  Host organization 

Small Business Development Center - Brockport

###  Type of event 

Resource Partner event

## Event description

Whether you are a small business owner (or just starting), content creator, or marketer, this workshop will help you master your phone photography.  

You will be guided through creating compelling imagery using your smartphone, while receiving real-time feedback in this hands-on workshop.  Both people and product photography will be addressed.
Register
#### § 367.1750 Account 175, Derivative instrument assets.

This account must include the amounts paid for derivative instruments, and the change in the fair value of all derivative instrument assets not designated as cash flow or fair value hedges. Account 421, Miscellaneous income or loss (§ 367.4210), must be credited or debited, as appropriate, with the corresponding amount of the change in the fair value of the derivative instrument.
### Part A—Generally
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 863 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the grade and pay of 

podiatrists of the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 25, 2019 

Mr. CASSIDY (for himself and Mr. TESTER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the grade 

and pay of podiatrists of the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF GRADE AND PAY OF PODIA4 TRISTS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 

5 AFFAIRS. 

6 (a) GRADE.—The list in section 7404(b) of title 38, 

7 United States Code, is amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘PODIATRIC SURGEON 

9 (DPM)’’ and inserting ‘‘PODIATRIST’’; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 863 CPS

1 (2) by inserting after the item relating to ‘‘Phy2 sician and surgeon grade.’’ the following new item: 

3 ‘‘Podiatrist grade.’’. 

4 (b) PAY.— 

5 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 7431 of such title is 

6 amended— 

7 (A) by striking ‘‘physician and dentist’’ 

8 each place it appears and inserting ‘‘physician, 

9 podiatrist, and dentist’’; 

10 (B) by striking ‘‘physicians and dentists’’ 

11 each place it appears and inserting ‘‘physicians, 

12 podiatrists, and dentists’’; 

13 (C) by striking ‘‘physician or dentist’’ each 

14 place it appears and inserting ‘‘physician, podi15 atrist, or dentist’’; 

16 (D) by striking ‘‘physicians or dentists’’ 

17 each place it appears and inserting ‘‘physicians, 

18 podiatrists, or dentists’’; 

19 (E) by striking ‘‘Physician and Dentist’’ 

20 each place it appears and inserting ‘‘Physician, 

21 Podiatrist, and Dentist’’; and 

22 (F) in subsection (e)(1)(A), by inserting 

23 ‘‘podiatrists and’’ before ‘‘dentists.’’. 

24 (2) ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS.—Section 7433 

25 of such title is amended by striking ‘‘physicians and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•S 863 CPS

1 dentists’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘physi2 cians, podiatrists, and dentists’’. 

3 (3) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The heading 

4 of subchapter III of chapter 74 of such title is 

5 amended by inserting ‘‘, PODIATRISTS,’’ after 

6 ‘‘PHYSICIANS’’. 

7 (4) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sec8 tions at the beginning of chapter 74 of such title is 

9 amended by striking the item relating to subchapter 

10 III and inserting the following new item: 

‘‘SUBCHAPTER III—PAY FOR PHYSICIANS, PODIATRISTS, AND DENTISTS’’. 

11 (5) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—Section 7433 of 

12 such title is further amended— 

13 (A) by striking subsection (b); 

14 (B) in subsection (a)— 

15 (i) by striking ‘‘(1) The Secretary’’ 

16 and inserting ‘‘The Secretary’’; and 

17 (ii) by redesignating paragraph (2) as 

18 subsection (b); and 

19 (C) in subsection (b), as so redesignated— 

20 (i) by striking ‘‘In prescribing’’ and 

21 inserting ‘‘RECOMMENDATIONS AND

22 VIEWS.—In prescribing’’; and 

23 (ii) by striking ‘‘this paragraph’’ and 

24 inserting ‘‘this subsection’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
#### § 725.6 Principles, standards and procedures.

The Principles, Standards and Procedures established by the Council pursuant to section 103 of Pub. L. 89-80 shall reflect the provisions of the Executive Orders. These Principles, Standards and Procedures are found in 18 CFR parts 710 through 717.
#### § 367.101 Accounts 231-243, Current and accrued liabilities.

Current and accrued liabilities are those obligations which have either matured or which become due within one year from the date of issuance or assumption, except for: bonds, receivers' certificates and similar obligations which must be classified as long-term debt until date of maturity; accrued taxes, such as income taxes, which must be classified as accrued liabilities even though payable more than one year from date; compensation awards, which must be classified as current liabilities regardless of date due; and minor amounts payable in installments which may be classified as current liabilities. If a liability is due more than one year from date of issuance or assumption by the service company, it shall be credited to a long-term debt account appropriate for the transaction, except, however, the current liabilities previously mentioned.
MANTENGA 

LA CALMA

 Y

 LÁVESE LAS 

MANOS

CS244232A

MLS #244232