alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 5, 2018

s1002

Order 

Clerk

October 5, 2018

157821-2

_________________________________________

In re MGR, Minor. SC: 157821-2

COA: 338286; 340203

Oakland CC Family Division:

2016-842995-AD

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 27, 2018 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The time allowed 

for oral argument shall be 20 minutes for each side. MCR 7.314(B)(1).

Appellants shall file their brief within 42 days of the date of this order addressing: 

(1) whether the Court of Appeals erred in determining that the trial court’s decisions 

under Section 39 of the Adoption Code, MCL 710.39, were moot in light of the order of 

filiation that entered in the paternity action; and (2) whether In re MKK, 286 Mich App 

546 (2009), should be overruled. The appellees shall file their briefs within 21 days of 

being served with the appellants’ brief. A reply, if any, must be filed by the appellants 

within 14 days of being served with the respective appellee’s brief. 

We further direct the Clerk to schedule the oral argument in this case for the same 

future session of the Court when it will hear oral argument in In re LMB, Minor (Docket 

No. 157903).

The Family Law Section of the State Bar of Michigan is invited to file a brief 

amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues 

presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae. 

Motions for permission to file briefs amicus curiae and briefs amicus curiae 

regarding these cases should be filed in this case only and served on the parties in both 

cases.
Editorial Note on Part 0
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 0 appear at 73 FR 73 FR 54947, Sept. 24, 2008.

§ 0.29 Organization. ( a ) The Office of the Inspector General consists of an immediate office, which is composed of the Inspector General, the Deputy Inspector General, and the Office of the General Counsel, and five major divisions, each headed by an Assistant Inspector General. The five OIG divisions are: Audit; Investigations; Evaluation and Inspections; Oversight and Review; and Management and Planning.
( b ) The OIG is headquartered in Washington, DC. Investigations Field Offices and Audit Regional Offices are located in Washington, DC and throughout the United States. For a listing of specific office locations, see the OIG Internet Website at *http://www.usdoj.gov/oig .*
[Order No. 2167-98, 63 FR 36847, July 8, 1998, as amended by Order No. 2835-2006, 71 FR 54413, Sept. 15, 2006]
الزم البقاء في المنزل 

ّي الرعایة الطبیة.

ولا تخرج إلا لتلق

اغسل یدیك بالماء والصابون بشكل 

متكرر لمدة 20 ثانیة على الأقل.

ِغط فمك بمندیل ورقي عند السعال أو العطس،

 وتخلص من المندیل 

المستعمل في سلة القمامة.

احرص على تنظیف وتطھیر الأشیاء 

والأسطح التي تلمسھا باستمرار.

تجنب لمس عینیك وأنفك وفمك. 

تجنب الاحتكاك بالمرضى. 

سـاعد في منع انتشـار أمراض الجهاز التنفسـي مثل فیروس كورونا -19COVID.

19COVID/gov.cdc

PM 1:02 2020 16, March L314915-CS

أقفـوا انتشـار الجراثيـم
### SUBCHAPTER LIX–WW—OCMULGEE MOUNDS NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK
### §2418. Annual report

#### (a) Contents

Not later than December 31 of each year, the Center shall report to the President and to the Congress on activities pursuant to the provision of this subchapter during the preceding fiscal year; such reports shall include a detailed statement of all public and private funds received and expended together with such recommendations as the Center deems appropriate. Such report shall include an analysis of the extent to which each agency of the Federal Government which has significant responsibilities for assisting in the improvement of productivity is carrying out such responsibilities consistent with the provisions of this chapter, including (A) an accounting of all funds expended or obligated by such agencies for activities and projects to improve productivity growth, (B) an assessment of the extent to which such expenditures or obligations have furthered the policies of the Center, and (C) the Center's recommendations on how these expenditures and obligations can be better coordinated to accomplish the purposes of this chapter.

#### (b) Referral to appropriate committees

Each report required to be submitted to the Congress by this chapter shall be referred to the standing committee or committees having jurisdiction over any part of the subject matter of the report.

(Pub. L. 94–136, title II, §208, Nov. 28, 1975, 89 Stat. 740.)
#### § 270.202 Definition of determination.

For purposes of this subpart, a determination has been made by a jurisdictional agency when such determination is administratively final before such agency.
Exhibit 14.1

Independent Auditors' Consent

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 relating to the ARCADIS G&M, Inc. 2002 Officer
Stock Purchase Plan (File No. 333-104780), the ARCADIS NV 2002 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (File No. 333-91646), the ARCADIS NV 2001 Long Term Incentive Share
Option Plan (File No. 333-99489), the Heidemij N.V. 1996 Incentive Plan (File No. 333-06280), and the Heidemij N.V. 1994 Incentive Plan (File
No. 33-76328), of our report dated March 5, 2004, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of ARCADIS NV as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related
consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003, which report appears in the
December 31, 2003 Annual Report on Form 20-F of ARCADIS NV.

De
Meern, The Netherlands, June 4, 2004

KPMG
Accountants N.V.

---



QuickLinks
### SUBCHAPTER CI—MOUNT BAKER RECREATION AREA
# C_2011186EN.01001101.xml

| 25.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 186/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 186/11

---

Action brought on 28 February 2011 — European Commission v Kingdom of Denmark

(Case C-95/11)

2011/C 186/18

Language of the case: Danish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal, acting as Agent, and H. Peytz, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Denmark

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, by allowing for non-taxable persons to be part of a VAT group, the Kingdom of Denmark has failed to fulfil its obligations under Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax; (1) |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by allowing for non-taxable persons to be part of a VAT group, the Kingdom of Denmark has failed to fulfil its obligations under Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax; (1)

1

| — | order the Kingdom of Denmark to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Kingdom of Denmark to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In order to simplify administration and prevent certain forms of abuse, the VAT Directive allows the Member States to regard two or more taxable persons as a single taxable person. The Commission takes the view that the Directive does not allow non-taxable persons to be part of such a VAT group and thereby be covered by the rights and obligations which apply to taxable persons. Therefore, the Danish legislation, which allows non-taxable persons to be part of a VAT group, is not compatible with the Directive.

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.

1

---
•.•iKi : 

### ^SPORWIO M 

### COKE T dPEHMION S m i •F B i S P 3-

- ! Docke t Managemen t

Facility U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Docke t No . FAA-2012-008 9 120 0 New Jerse y Ave . S E Wes t Buildin g Gran dFloor , Roo mW-12014 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 February 9 , 201 2 T o Who mIt

Ma y Concern : I wis h to expres s m

y stron g support

for Su n Country Airlines ' slo t exemption . Docke t No . FAA-2012-0089 , t o maintai n it s curren t nonsto p Lansing-t o Washington , D C route . As. aresident-oLLansing , Michigan , former-state^o f Michigan.employee_and.current

Michiga n Stat e University employe e with frequen t busines s i n ou r

nation' s capital , direc t nonsto p flights fromLansin g Capita l Regio n Internationa l Airport t o Washington , D C hav e provide da

n extremel y valuabl e service . Th e flight s als o provid e convenien t an d affordabl e transportatio n betwee n mid-Michiga n an d Washington , D C for vacatio n travel . Th e onl y alternativ e i s t o boo k connectin g flight

fromLansin g t o Detroi t

Metr o Airport , o r driv e t o Detroi t

Metr o Airport , for

flight s to/fro mWashington , DC . Thi s usuall y require s significan t

extr aexpense s fo

r fiiel , parking , an d tim e commitment s fo r driving . I t i s m y understandin g that

deman dan d passenge r

booking s fo

r thes e flights to/fro m Lansin g an dWashington , DC , hav e exceede d expectation s an d marke t projections . Whil e I' msure that

th e regulations , criteri aan d proces s for approvin g airport

slot s fo r airline s ar e complicate dan dbase do n avariety o f factors , I hop e tha

t U.S . DO T an d any othe r agencie s withi n th e federal bureaucrac y that hav e jurisdictio n ar e abl e t o accommodat e thi s nee dthat

serve s s o man y peopl e i n th e mid-Michiga n area . Than k yo u fo r considerin g thi s lette r

o f support fo r Su n Countr

y Airlines . Sincerely , Philli p D . Schertzi n 358 0 Donamer e Dr . Lansing , M I 4890 6
## Program Evaluations

                  -  Evaluation Reports 
                  -  Evaluation Policies 
                  -  Ongoing Evaluations 

#   Ongoing Evaluations

CBHSQ is responsible for improving access to valid and reliable information on evidence-based programs and practices, including information on the strength of evidence associated with such programs and practices, related to mental and substance use disorders.

The Office of Evaluation (OE), a key part of the SAMHSA’s commitment to rigorous evaluation, maintains information on evidence-based programs and practices that have been reviewed by the Office of Assistant Secretary for Mental Health and Substance Use.
§ 5.25 Applications requiring a draft NEPA document. ( a ) If the Commission determines that a license application will be processed with an environmental impact statement, or a draft and final environmental assessment, the Commission will issue the draft environmental impact statement or environmental assessment for comment no later than 180 days from the date responses are due to the notice of acceptance and ready for environmental analysis provided for in § 5.22.
( b ) Each draft environmental document will include for comment draft license articles, a preliminary determination of the consistency of each fish and wildlife agency recommendation made pursuant to section 10(j) of the Federal Power Act with the purposes and requirements of the Federal Power Act and other applicable law, as provided for in § 5.26, and any preliminary mandatory terms and conditions and fishways prescriptions.
( c ) Comments on a draft environmental document issued pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section, including comments in response to the Commission's preliminary determination with respect to fish and wildlife agency recommendations and on preliminary mandatory terms and conditions or prescriptions must be filed no later than 30 or 60 days after issuance of the draft environmental document, as specified in the notice accompanying issuance of the draft environmental document.
( d ) Modified mandatory prescriptions or terms and conditions must be filed no later than 60 days following the date for filing of comments provided for in paragraph (c) of this section.
( e ) The Commission will issue a final environmental document within 90 days following the date for filing of modified mandatory prescriptions or terms and conditions.
### **CHAPTER 78—NATIONAL NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION FOUNDATION**

Sec.
5801 to 5809.
Repealed.
### SUBCHAPTER XXXVII—ACADIA NATIONAL PARK

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Lafayette National Park" changed to "Acadia National Park", see former section 342b of this title.
#### § 152.2 Form of application; service.

The application must be filed with the Secretary of the Commission in accordance with filing procedures posted on the Commission's Web site at *http://www.ferc.gov.* A copy of the application shall be served on the State Commission which has jurisdiction over the applicant and upon each wholesale customer of the applicant.

[Order 737, 75 FR 43404, July 26, 2010]
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Amazing  Investments,  Inc.,
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"),  the undersigned,  B.
Stephen Bailey,  Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my  knowledge  and
belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 740.5 Review and approval of State applications and programs. ( a ) The Council shall review and approve each State application for financial assistance if it is determined that: ( 1 ) The State water management planning program meets the objectives of the Act;
( 2 ) The State application and the State water management planning program meet the requirements of this part; and
( 3 ) Progress on the previous grant period's work plan is satisfactory, based on the requirements set forth by the Council.
( b ) Based on the review of the application, the Council shall determine the amount of funds to be made available pursuant to § 740.6 and shall notify the designated agency in each participating State of the grant award as soon as possible after funds are apportioned for Council use.
( c ) If an application is not approved by the Council, it shall be returned by registered mail with a full explanation of the reasons for that determination. The State shall then be allowed the opportunity to submit a revised application within 30 days after receipt by the State of such notification. Should the State determine that further review is required by the State clearinghouse under OMB Circular A-95, an additional 30 days will be allowed.
( d ) If the grant amount requested by a State differs from the grant amount offered by the Council, the Council will request the designated State agency to submit a revised budget and work plan with the acceptance of the grant offer.
( e ) The State, upon acceptance of the terms and conditions of the notice of grant award, as presented by the Council, will be granted financial assistance in the amount of the approved final budget.
( f ) The work plan for the State water management planning program may be revised at any time by submitting revisions to the work plan and budget to the Council for approval in connection with any proposed significant change (an addition or deletion of major activities specified in the approved work plan) with appropriate provision for A-95 State clearinghouse review. The Council will review the proposed revision and notify the State of its decision no later than 30 days from the date of receipt of the request.
### SUBCHAPTER I—UNITED STATES CORAL REEF TASK FORCE
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 23.01
                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



The Board of Directors
Macromedia, Inc. and Subsidiaries:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
33-89092, 333-24713, 333-39285, and 333-64141) on Form S-8 and the
registration statement (No. 333-32193) on Form S-3 of Macromedia, Inc. of our
report dated April 30, 1999, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Macromedia and subsidiaries as of March 31, 1999, and 1998, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows
for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 1999 and the
related financial statement schedule, which report appears in the March 31,
1999, annual report on Form 10-K of Macromedia, Inc.


                                                KPMG LLP


San Francisco, California
June 15, 1999















                                    Page 54
Creation Date Thu Sep 10, 1998  11:40 AM                            Page    1
CMB95A

From: The Chase Manhattan Bank

To:   Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.


                   MONTHLY CERTIFICATEHOLDER'S REPORT
                   ----------------------------------

Due Period 36 Beginning Date                     08/01/1998
Due Period 36 End Date                           08/31/1998
Determination Date                               09/10/1998
Remittance Date                                  09/15/1998


I.    Monthly Principal and Principal Carryover Shortfall to Certificateholders
      (Per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                  $ 11.9047700567

II.   Monthly Interest and Unpaid Interest to Certificateholders
      (Per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                   $ 0.6868491040

III.  Monthly Expenses Summary

      A. Servicing Fee Disbursement                                $ 171,751.16
      B. Cash Collateral Account Expense                                 $ 0.00
      C. Total Expenses paid
         (per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                $ 0.1144748518

IV.   Cash Collateral Account Deposit Amount                             $ 0.00

V.    Outstanding Advance Summary

      A. From Prior Period                                       $ 3,767,284.48
      B. From Current Period                                     $ 3,722,912.08
      C. Change in Amount Between Periods (Lines B - A)            $ -44,372.40

VI.   Pool Factor Information

      A. Certificate Principal Balance                         $ 188,240,191.72
      B. Initial Certificate Balance                         $ 1,500,339,658.38
      C. Pool Factor (Lines A / B)                               0.125465050976

VII.  Available Cash Collateral Account Information for Due Period

      A. Available Cash Collateral Amount                       $ 11,252,547.44
      B. Available Cash Collateral Amount Percentage            5.459714473709%

VIII. Required Cash Collateral Amount

      A. For the Current Collection Period                      $ 11,252,547.44
      B. For the Next Collection Period                         $ 11,252,547.44
#### § 806.35 Fees.

Project sponsors shall have an affirmative duty to pay such fees as established by the Commission to cover its costs of administering the regulatory program established by this part, including any extraordinary costs associated with specific projects.

[71 FR 78579, Dec. 29, 2006, as amended at 75 FR 60622, Oct. 1, 2010]
**Exhibit 23.1**

**REPORT AND CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

TriQuint Semiconductor, Inc.: 

Underdate of March 14, 2007 we reported on the consolidated balance sheets of TriQuint Semiconductor, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations,stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006, as contained in the annual report on Form 10-K for the year 2006. In connection with our audits of the aforementionedconsolidated financial statements, we also audited the related consolidated financial statement schedule as contained in the annual report on Form 10-K for the year 2006. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of theCompany’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statement schedules based on our audits. 

In ouropinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein. 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-81245, 333-36112, 333-75464, 333-08891, 333-08893, 333-02166,333-31585, 333-48883, 333-66707, 333-74617, 333-81273, 333-39732, 333-39730, 333-61582, 333-65850, 333-89242, 333-102085, 333-105701, 333-115809, 333-120407, 333-125269, 333-134470) on Form S-8 of TriQuint Semiconductor, Inc. of our reportsdated March 14, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of TriQuint Semiconductor, Inc. as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows foreach of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006, and the related financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 andthe effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, which reports appear in the December 31, 2006 annual report on Form 10-K of TriQuint Semiconductor, Inc. 

As discussed in note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of FinancialAccounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123(R), *Share-Based Payment**s*. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Portland, Oregon 

March 14, 2007
§ 701.5 Organization pattern. ( a ) The Office of the Water Resources Council is composed of the Water Resources Council, the Chairman of the Water Resources Council, the Water Resources Council Staff headed by a Director, and Field Organizations within its jurisdiction.
( b ) The Water Resources Council consists of the following Members: The Secretary of Agriculture; the Secretary of the Army; the Secretary of Commerce; the Secretary of Energy; the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development; the Secretary of the Interior; the Secretary of Transportation; and the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency.
( c ) The Chairman of the Council is designated by the President.
( d ) The Water Resources Council staff is employed, assigned duties and responsibilities, and supervised by the Director.
( e ) The Council Members shall establish an Interagency Liaison Committee. Task forces may be established and assigned duties by the Director with the concurrence of the Members, and/or action of the Council. Any Council Member may provide each task force with whatever representation he or she deems necessary.
( f ) Field organizations are established by or operate under the Council and include field committees formerly under the Inter-Agency Committee on Water Resources and the offices of the Chairmen of Federal-State River Basin Commissions established under Title II of the Act.