alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### ISABEL G. PALAS, Plaintiff v. MONICO PALAS, Defendant

Civil No. 110-A

District Court of Guam Appellate Division

September 24, 1975

*414Before CURTIS, HEFNER and WILLIAMS, *Judges*

PER CURIAM

OPINION

This is an appeal by plaintiff, Isabel G. Palas, from a judgment in a divorce action dividing the property of the parties.

The background facts may be briefly stated. The parties commenced living together, without the benefit of marriage, in 1961. In 1966 plaintiff-appellant entered into an installment contract to purchase a piece of property in Finegayan, NCS, Guam, designated as Block 1, Lot 2, Dededo, Guam. Shortly thereafter, defendant-appellee and relatives of appellant built a home on the property and the parties moved in and resided there until their separation *415in 1972. The parties were married in 1967. Although the title to said property was actually obtained in the maiden name of appellant, appellee contributed approximately one-half of the purchase price. Subsequent to the marriage, the parties entered into an installment contract to purchase Lot 1, Block 3, Tract 172, Mogfog, Dededo, and the full purchase price has not yet been paid.

The trial court, after hearing the evidence presented on behalf of the respective parties, granted appellant a divorce and awarded all of Lot 1, Block 3, Tract 172, Mogfog, Dededo, to the appellee and all of Finegayan, NCS, Guam, designated as Block 1, Lot 2, Dededo, Guam, to appellant.

On appeal appellant contends the trial court’s division of the property was error since the NCS property is her sole and separate property to which she is entitled as a matter of right, and that the Mogfog property should be divided equally between the parties in accordance with § 146(2) of the Civil Code of Guam.

Although the trial court did not specifically find the NCS property to be community property, it did hold, because of the manner in which it was acquired, it should be distributed in accordance with the same principles as community property.

Appellant’s contention that she is entitled to the NCS property as a matter of right must fail since all property of the parties to a divorce action, whether community or separate, is subject to the jurisdiction of the court. *Worthington v. Worthington*(1968), 440 P.2d 478.

The ultimate question in such cases is whether the final division of the property is just and equitable and only a clear abuse of discretion will warrant this court’s substituting its judgment for that of the trial court in a divorce proceeding property division. *Kennedy v. Kennedy*(1969), 452 P.2d 243. We find no abuse of discretion by the *416trial court and therefore the judgment appealed from is hereby affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> CT
<CIK> 0000835095
<NAME> BOSTON CAPITAL TAX CREDIT FUND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              26,710,863
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                26,710,863
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,984
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,535,155)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,525,171)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

          - RIN 0648-XA298

# AGENCY:

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

# ACTION:

Notice of public meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council's (MAFMC) River Herring and Shad Ad Hoc Committee will hold a webinar meeting.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on Friday, April 1, 2011, from 1 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

                        The meeting will be held via webinar. Registration for the webinar is available at:                         *https://www1.gotomeeting.com/​register/​949596009.*                         A listening station will also be made available at the Council's address below.                    

*Council address:*                         Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 800 N. State Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901; telephone: (302) 674-2331.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Christopher M. Moore PhD, Executive Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 800 N. State Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901; telephone: (302) 526-5255.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The purpose of this meeting is to develop recommendations for the Council regarding options available to the Council for management of River Herring (blueback and alewife) and Shad (American and hickory) stocks. Any briefing materials will be posted on the Council's Web site,                     *http://www.mafmc.org.*

## Special Accommodations

The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids should be directed to M. Jan Saunders at the Mid-Atlantic Council Office (302) 526-5251 at least 5 days prior to the meeting date.

Dated: March 11, 2011.

Tracey L. Thompson,

Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.

[FR Doc. 2011-6095 Filed 3-15-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
### Part B—Management Provisions
Exhibit 20.1
                                                     ------------

Chase Manhattan Bank Grantor Trust 1995-B

From: The Chase Manhattan Bank

To:   Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.


                   MONTHLY CERTIFICATEHOLDER'S REPORT
                   ----------------------------------

Due Period 22 Beginning Date                     08/01/1997
Due Period 22 End Date                           08/31/1997
Determination Date                               09/10/1997
Remittance Date                                  09/15/1997


I.    Monthly Principal and Principal Carryover Shortfall to Certificateholders
      (Per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                  $ 21.8816301286

II.   Monthly Interest and Unpaid Interest to Certificateholders
      (Per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                   $ 1.8862651657

III.  Monthly Expenses Summary

      A. Servicing Fee Disbursement                                $ 478,268.34
      B. Cash Collateral Account Expense                                 $ 0.00
      C. Total Expenses paid
         (per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                $ 0.3197059587

IV.   Cash Collateral Account Deposit Amount                             $ 0.00

V.    Outstanding Advance Summary

      A. From Prior Period                                       $ 3,995,675.18
      B. From Current Period                                     $ 4,177,067.67
      C. Change in Amount Between Periods (Lines B - A)            $ 181,392.49

VI.   Pool Factor Information

      A. Certificate Principal Balance                         $ 541,187,897.52
      B. Initial Certificate Balance                         $ 1,495,963,171.74
      C. Pool Factor (Lines A / B)                               0.361765521868

VII.  Available Cash Collateral Account Information for Due Period

      A. Available Cash Collateral Amount                       $ 28,696,100.52
      B. Available Cash Collateral Amount Percentage            5.000000000610%

VIII. Required Cash Collateral Amount

      A. For the Current Collection Period                      $ 28,696,100.52
      B. For the Next Collection Period                         $ 27,059,394.88
#### § 401.102 Partial disclosure of records.

If a record contains both disclosable and nondisclosable information, the nondisclosable information will be deleted and the remaining record will be disclosed unless the two are so inextricably intertwined that it is not feasible to separate them or release of the disclosable information would compromise or impinge upon the nondisclosable portion of the record.
#### AMERICAN LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY OF KENTUCKY, Movant, v. Adele JOHNSON, Opposed.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Sept. 26, 1939.

Pentecost & Dorsey for movant.

Henson & Taylor, opposed.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal denied; judgment affirmed.
#### § 292.308 Standards for operating reliability.

Any State regulatory authority (with respect to any electric utility over which it has ratemaking authority) or nonregulated electric utility may establish reasonable standards to ensure system safety and reliability of interconnected operations. Such standards may be recommended by any electric utility, any qualifying facility, or any other person. If any State regulatory authority (with respect to any electric utility over which it has ratemaking authority) or nonregulated electric utility establishes such standards, it shall specify the need for such standards on the basis of system safety and reliability.
EXHIBIT 11
                               EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic and diluted earnings per share were computed as follows: (In thousands,
except per share data)

                                                       Three Months Ended
                                                          December 31,
                                                     -----------------------
 BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE:                              2000         1999
                                                     ----------   ----------
Net income                                           $      153   $      149
Weighted average common shares outstanding                2,201        2,290
Basic earnings per share                             $     0.07   $     0.07

 DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:
Net income                                           $      153   $      149
Weighted average common shares outstanding                2,201        2,290
Additional potentially dilutive securities
   (equivalent in common stock)
          Stock options                                       5           --
                                                     ----------   ----------
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding        2,206        2,290

Diluted earnings per share                           $     0.07   $     0.07

                                       15
#### § 152.5 Applicability of exemption.

Nothing in this part shall be construed to relieve any person exempted from the provisions of the Natural Gas Act by section 1(c) thereof from compliance with valid State regulatory requirements. If an exemption from the provisions of the Natural Gas Act is effective pursuant to section 1(c), the exempted person shall be responsible for calling to the attention of the State Commission by which it is regulated and of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission any future operations in which it may engage which may make the exemption inapplicable to it. The exempted person shall also be responsible for calling to the attention of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission any changes, amendment, or judicial or administrative interpretation of the State law pursuant to which it is regulated, which may make the exemption inapplicable to it.

(Sec. 1(c), 68 Stat. 36; 15 U.S.C. 717(c))

[Order 306, 30 FR 12729, Oct. 6, 1965, as amended by Order 737, 75 FR 43404, July 26, 2010]
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Crescent Moon, Inc., on Form
10-QSB for the period  ending August 31, 2003 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  Robert
Denome,  Principal  Executive  and  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: February 19, 2004

 /s/ Robert P. Denome
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert P. Denome
President, Principal Executive and Financial Officer


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
•

•

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SUBJECT

Governor's Letter*

Program Description

Attorney General's Statement

Memorandum of. Agreement

Public Participation·

Statutes and Rules

State Legislation Checklist

Completeness Checklist*

SECTION

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

•

·These sections are unchanged from the original final authorization

application dated June 1, 1984, and therefore are not included herein in

this revised application•

ZB4956 (8/30/85)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> CT
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              28,118,356
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                28,118,356
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,202
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,027,253)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,019,051)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 







































 
 

  Exhibit 10.12    
    


 
    Axcelis Technologies, Inc.
  Named Executive Officer Base Compensation at March 4, 2016    
    


        This Exhibit discloses the current understandings with respect to base compensation between Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") and each of:



	•
	 the Company's principal executive officer (Mary G. Puma), 



	•
	 the Company's principal financial officer (Kevin J. Brewer), and 



	•
	 the three most highly compensated other executive officers serving as executive officers at December 31, 2015. 




        These
executive officers are referred to herein as "named executive officers" or "NEOs." 


        Mary
G. Puma and the Company have entered into a written agreement addressing a minimum level of base salary due to the executive. The Company's Amended and Restated Employment Agreement
with Ms. Puma ("Puma Employment Agreement") is listed as an Exhibit to this Form 10-K. Each of the other NEOs and the Company have entered into an Executive Separation Pay Agreement
dated as of March 5, 2015 in which a termination without cause will entitle the executive to year of separation pay. The form of Executive Separation Pay Agreement is listed as an Exhibit to
this Form 10-K. 


        The
Company maintains that all executive officers, other than Ms. Puma, are employees at will and that the Company has no obligation to continue their employment, other in cases
where such obligation arises under the Change of Control Agreements described in our Proxy Statement and filed as an Exhibit to this Form 10-K. 








Rate of Base Pay  


        In the course of the employment relationship with each NEO, the Company communicates to the named executive officer the amount of base
salary approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, which compensation is subject to change in the discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (provided
Ms. Puma's employment agreement sets a minimum base pay amount). The following table sets forth the annual base salary as communicated to the named executive officers of the Company as in
effect on March 4, 2016: 

 






							
	Named Executive Officer



 
	 	Title 	 	Rate of Annual

Base Pay 	 
	 Mary G. Puma
	 	President and Chief Executive Officer	 	

$	550,000	 
	 Kevin J. Brewer
	 	Executive VP and Chief Financial Officer	 	

$	350,000	 
	 William Bintz
	 	Executive VP, Engineering and Marketing	 	

$	330,000	 
	 John E. Aldeborgh
	 	Executive VP, Global Customer Operations	 	

$	330,000	 
	 Lynnette C. Fallon
	 	Executive VP, HR/Legal and General Counsel	 	

$	320,000	 




 

 1











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.12


Axcelis Technologies, Inc. Named Executive Officer Base Compensation at March 4, 2016
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-K
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                      DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                              2,802,396
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       8,624,437
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (5,299,595)
<INVENTORY>                                           995,007
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    7,884,908
<PP&E>                                             16,664,534
<DEPRECIATION>                                     (3,772,464)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     30,090,588
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               5,671,655
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                           41,104,828
<OTHER-SE>                                        (30,813,390)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       30,090,588
<SALES>                                            33,256,754
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   39,571,587
<CGS>                                              24,497,346
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      20,208,239
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     (555,878)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    6,615,111
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   (253,731)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (24,328,389)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (25,770,108)
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (25,770,108)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           (3.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (3.43)
                                                                

</TABLE>
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 555 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the treatment of 

veterans who participated in the cleanup of Enewetak Atoll as radiationexposed veterans for purposes of the presumption of service-connection 

of certain disabilities by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 26, 2019 

Ms. SMITH (for herself, Mr. TILLIS, Ms. WARREN, Mr. MERKLEY, Ms. COLLINS, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. LEAHY, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. WYDEN, Mr. 

TESTER, Mr. COONS, Ms. HARRIS, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. MARKEY, and Mr. 

KING) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the 

treatment of veterans who participated in the cleanup 

of Enewetak Atoll as radiation-exposed veterans for purposes of the presumption of service-connection of certain 

disabilities by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 555 IS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mark Takai Atomic 

3 Veterans Healthcare Parity Act of 2019’’. 

4 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF VETERANS WHO PARTICIPATED IN 

5 CLEANUP OF ENEWETAK ATOLL AS RADI6 ATION-EXPOSED VETERANS FOR PURPOSES 

7 OF PRESUMPTION OF SERVICE-CONNECTION 

8 OF CERTAIN DISABILITIES BY DEPARTMENT 

9 OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. 

10 Section 1112(c)(3)(B) of title 38, United States 

11 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 

12 clause: 

13 ‘‘(v) Cleanup of Enewetak Atoll during the 

14 period beginning on January 1, 1977, and end15 ing on December 31, 1980.’’. 

Æ 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
§ 415.21 Class II projects. Class II projects, subject to review in accordance with §§ 415.40 through 415.43 of this part, include all projects other than Class I projects, in non-tidal areas of the basin, which involve either: ( a ) A development of land, either residential or non-residential within a flood hazard area which: ( 1 ) Includes one or more structures covering a total land area in excess of 50,000 square feet; or
( 2 ) Contains in excess of 25 residential building lots or 25 dwelling units as part of an integrated development plan whether or not such development is included in a single application; or
( b ) A development of land in the flood hazard area to mine, manufacture, process, store or dispose of materials which, if flooded, would pollute the waters of the basin or threaten damage to off-site areas, including, without limitation thereto, materials which are poisonous, radioactive, biologically undesirable or floatable.