alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 19,680.

#### In the Matter of the Estate of Alvin Steward Hubbs, etc., et al. *v.*Fred Hubbs, et al.

(365 P. [2d] 543)

Decided October 9, 1961.

Rehearing denied October 30, 1961.

Messrs. Hayutin and Hayutin, for plaintiffs in error.

Messrs. Southard and Southard, for defendant in error Fred Hubbs.

Messrs. Cross and Christensen, for defendant in error Grace Chenoweth.

Mr. Robert M. McCreary, for defendants in error Olive Leonard, Thelma Cowles, Florence Beyer, Norma Wilson and Dorothy Rankin.

*In Department.*

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Frantz.

*206In a hearing on a petition to construe a will the trial court refused to receive extrinsic evidence to ascertain the intent of the testator. The trial court conceived the instrument to be plain and unambiguous, containing words having in law a well-accepted and defined meaning, leaving nothing for the court to do but follow the import of the language employed. Was the ruling of the trial court erroneous?

Alvin Steward Hubbs executed his will on May 2, 1949. He died on March 20, 1958. His brother, Otto Hubbs, passed away on August 28, 1953. By his will, Alvin provided that the residue of his estate go “to my brother Otto Hubbs and my sister Grace Chenoweth, share and share alike, to each an undivided one-half interest therein, and to their heirs and assigns forever.”

That Otto predeceased Alvin gives the words, “and to their heirs and assigns,” a special significance. The heirs of Otto maintain that the quoted words are terms of substitution, and hence they take what Otto would have taken. Defendants in error contend that they are words of limitation, and that upon the death of Otto his one-half of the residue lapsed and passed to Alvin’s heirs.

It is to be noted that the testator’s will was left unchanged, although *Feeney v. Mahoney,*(1950) 121 Colo. 599, 221 P. (2d) 357, and *Cann v. Richards,*(1952) 126 Colo. 54, 246 P. (2d) 906, decided while the will existed, had made it a tenet of the law that unless language is employed in the will showing an intent to dispose of property to the contrary, such words or their equivalent are deemed terms of limitation. See *McCormick v. Hall,*337 Ill. 232, 168 N.E. 900.

Just recently we again considered the purport of these words in the case of *In re Estate of Anna F. Newby, Tarr v. Newby, et al.,*146 Colo. 296, 361 P. (2d) 622, and followed the above precedents. We find nothing in Alvin’s will that makes inapplicable the doctrine enunciated in these decisions.

We conclude that the words, “and to their heirs *207and. assigns forever,” without other language indicating a contrary intention on the part of Alvin, are an expression of limitation; thus, the one-half of the residue became a lapsed legacy, passing to the heirs at law of Alvin.

The judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Day and Mr. Justice McWilliams concur.
## Breadcrumb

-  Inicio 
-  Work For SBA 

Parte o todo el contenido en esta página disponible solo en inglés.

# Work for SBA

Are you excited by the idea of helping to support $39 billion in small business financing and setting proper conditions to stimulate America’s economic growth?

              Find jobs at SBA            

-  Employee Life              At SBA, we work to make America's small businesses stronger. What will you do today?                  Learn more about employee life 
-  Jobs at SBA              SBA is committed to building a high-performing, 21st century workforce.                  Find jobs at SBA 
-  Contracting for SBA              Find contracting opportunities with the U.S. Small Business Administration.                  Learn more about contracting for SBA
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 15 (Thursday, January 23, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3913-3914]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-01315]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8604]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Degenerate Art: The Attack on Modern Art in Nazi 
Germany, 1937''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of

[[Page 3914]]

October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 
of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 
1998 (112 Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), 
Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of 
Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation 
of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the 
objects to be included in the exhibition ``Degenerate Art: The Attack 
on Modern Art in Nazi Germany, 1937,'' imported from abroad for 
temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural 
significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with 
the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition 
or display of the exhibit objects at the Neue Galerie, New York, New 
York, from on or about March 13, 2014, until on or about June 30, 2014, 
and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, 
is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: January 16, 2014.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-01315 Filed 1-22-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
### §931. Repealed. Pub. L. 92–181, title V, §5.26(a), Dec. 10, 1971, 85 Stat. 624

Section, acts July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §26, 39 Stat. 380; Aug. 18, 1959, Pub. L. 86–168, title I, §104(h), 73 Stat. 387, exempted land banks and land bank associations from taxation and directed that mortgages and bonds be deemed instrumentalities of government. See section 2055 of this title.
ACTIVITY: DETERMINING THE TRAINING NEEDS OF NEW PARTNERS | 1

Activity: Determining the Training Needs of New 

Partners

What’s exciting about collaborating is that it allows us to work with partners 

who are different than we are—partners whose differences help us 

understand and address prevention problems in new and creative ways. 

Yet to work together successfully, collaborative teams can’t just be different. They also need to 

possess—both individually and collectively—the knowledge and skills needed to move the 

team’s prevention efforts forward. For example, if a team is tasked with addressing a specific 

prevention problem, it’s important that everyone on the team share a basic understanding of 

the problem—including related consequences and contributing factors. Similarly, if a team is 

tasked with following a specific planning model, all members should be familiar with the model. 

The activity described below is designed to help teams identify and prioritize their knowledge 

needs. Engaging in a collaborative assessment process will help to ensure that the needs of all 

members are heard. It also gives teams a chance to practice some of the decision-making skills 

they will use to explore and solve problems as they continue working together. 

MATERIALS NEEDED:

• Package of large sticky notes

• Package of adhesive dots

DIRECTIONS: 

• Designate a team member to facilitate the activity.

• Distribute 10–20 large sticky notes to each team member. 

Exploring Ways to Work Together
ACTIVITY: DETERMINING THE TRAINING NEEDS OF NEW PARTNERS | 2

• Ask the group, “If we were going to build our knowledge over the next year, what topics 

would you like to learn about?” (Consider giving participants a “cheat sheet” that outlines 

some items they may want to consider.) 

• Give the group at least 15 minutes to write down their responses—one per sticky note—

and then collect everyone’s responses. 

• Using the wall as a canvas, group similar responses together. 

• Assign a heading to each category or topic (e.g., the Strategic Prevention Framework, 

evaluation basics, prescription drug prevention strategies). These headings are your list 

of identified knowledge needs. 

• As a group, prioritize the list. To do this, distribute small dots or stickers to the team, 

then have team members “vote” on which topics to address first by placing their stickers 

on the two to five needs that they feel are most important. 

• Count the dots to see which knowledge needs the group prioritized (i.e., the more 

stickers or dots, the greater the priority). 

• Discuss ideas for addressing prioritized needs. As a next step, you may want to invite a 

few member volunteers to explore training options for some of the needs the group 

identified. 

SPTAC@edc.org | samhsa.gov/SPTAC
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6084

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TYRONE LOVELL STATON, a/k/a T Bone, a/k/a Bone,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CR-90-108)

Submitted: May 7, 1996 Decided: July 23, 1996

Before HALL, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tyrone Lovell Staton, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Dee Griffith, Jr.,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Tyrone Lovell Staton appeals the district court's

order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion to vacate his sentence. We have reviewed the record and the district court's order

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially

on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Staton,

No. CR-90-108 (E.D. Va. Dec. 19, 1995). We find that the ambiguity

existing in Staton's resentencing agreement with the Government

constituted only harmless error and that the court properly applied

a base offense level of 30. We also find harmless the resentencing

court's mistaken reference to an incorrect count of the grand jury

indictment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 862 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.862

                     One Hundred Sixteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and nineteen

                                 An Act

 
  To extend the sunset for collateral requirements for Small Business 
                     Administration disaster loans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Rebuilding Small Businesses After 
Disasters Act''.
SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF SUNSET FOR COLLATERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SBA 
DISASTER LOANS.
    Section 2102(b) of the RISE After Disaster Act of 2015 (15 U.S.C. 
636 note) is amended, in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by 
striking ``4 years'' and inserting ``7 years''.
SEC. 3. GAO REPORT ON DEFAULT RATES.
    Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the Committee 
on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate and the Committee 
on Small Business of the House of Representatives a report comparing--
        (1) the performance, including the default rate, of loans made 
    under section 7(b)(1) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 
    636(b)(1)) during the period--
            (A) beginning on January 1, 2000; and
            (B) ending on the date on which the Small Business 
        Administration began making loans in accordance with the 
        amendment made by section 2102(a) of the RISE After Disaster 
        Act of 2015 (Public Law 114-88; 129 Stat. 690); and
        (2) the performance, including the default rate, of loans made 
    under 7(b)(1) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)) in 
    accordance with the amendment made by section 2102(a) of the RISE 
    After Disaster Act of 2015 (Public Law 114-88; 129 Stat. 690).

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  About SBA 
-  Organization 
-  Federal Advisory Committees 

## Section navigation

-  SBA locations 
-  Open government 
-  SBA Newsroom 
-  Work for SBA 
-  Organization    -  SBA leadership 
  -  Contact SBA 
  -  SBA initiatives 
  -  Forms and documents 
  -  Performance 
  -  Observances 
  -  Federal advisory committees 
-  Oversight and advocacy 
-  Information in other languages 

# Federal advisory committees

----

## Content

----

Advisory committees are groups created by statute. The President or agency heads provide advice and recommendations to relevant government agencies. Statutes or presidential directives can create exceptions to this general rule. There are five primary sources of authority for SBA's advisory committees:
                  - The Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA)
                  - The General Services Administration regulations implementing FACA
                  - The Small Business Act
                  - Standard operating procedures
                  - The advisory committees' charters

To determine their scope and duties, SBA officials consider the committee's charter. Advisory committees may not act in ways inconsistent with their charters.

## SBA advisory committees

Advisory committees take two forms. Advisory committees created by statute or the President are “non-discretionary.” Advisory committees created by an agency head are “discretionary.”

SBA's non-discretionary advisory committees are:
                  - The  Interagency Task Force on Veterans Small Business Development  (IATF)
                  - The  National Small Business Development Center Advisory Board
                  - The  Advisory Committee on Veterans Business Affairs
                  - The  Regional Regulatory Fairness Boards
                  - The  National Women’s Business Council
                  - The  Audit and Financial Management Advisory Committee

SBA's discretionary committees are:
                  - The National Advisory Council
                  - The District Advisory Councils
                  - The  Council on Underserved Communities
                  - The  Investment Capital Advisory Committee  (ICAC)
                  - The  Invention, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship Advisory Committee  (IIEAC)

## Additional resources

Find additional committee resources and answers to frequently asked questions.
                  - Nominate someone for a federal advisory committee
                  - Contact SBA about a federal advisory committee
                  - Common federal advisory committee questions
                  - FACA management overview
SAMHSA’s “Talk. They Hear You.”® Campaign 

Launches New Mobile App for Parents 

The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services 

Administration’s (SAMHSA) new “Talk. They Hear You.”® 

campaign mobile app helps parents and caregivers prepare for 

some of the most important conversations they may ever have 

with their kids. The app shows parents how to turn everyday 

situations into opportunities to talk with their kids about alcohol 

and other drugs. It also equips them with the necessary skills, 

confidence, and knowledge to start and continue these 

conversations as their kids get older.

Features of the new app include: 

• Sample conversation starters

• Ways to keep the conversation going

• An interactive practice simulation section

• The opportunity to earn badges for practicing and 

having real-life conversations 

• A resources section with informative and useful videos, 

fact sheets, brochures, infographics, guides/toolkits, 

and more

Download the App Today!

Parents and caregivers can download the app today to see how easy it can be to 

talk with their kids about underage drinking and other drug use. The app is 

available for free on the App Store, Google Play, and the Microsoft Store.

Scan the QR code or visit https://www.samhsa.gov/talk-they-hearyou/mobile-application to:

• Watch the app’s promo video. 

• Learn more about the app and see how it works.

• Find out how to download the app.
§ 430.31 Sanctions: Civil and criminal. ( a ) Any person, association, corporation, public or private entity who or which violates or attempts or conspires to violate any provision of this regulation, or any order, regulation or permit issued in furtherance thereof, shall be punishable as provided in section 14.17 of the Compact.
( b ) General Counsel of the Commission may, in his discretion, request the appropriate law enforcement officers of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to prosecute any or all violations of this regulation in accordance with the Compact and the laws of the Commonwealth, and for recovery of the fines fixed by section 14.17 of the Compact, in the name and on behalf of the Commission. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and its law enforcement officers are hereby requested pursuant to sections 10.1 and 11.5 of the Compact, to provide such technical, professional and administrative services as may be required for such enforcement.
( c ) In addition to such penal sanctions as may be imposed pursuant to this section, any violation of this regulation shall be subject to such civil remedies by injunction and otherwise as provided by law.
[46 FR 24, Jan. 2, 1981. Redesignated at 51 FR 25031, July 10, 1986]
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported) March 15, 2012





Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc.


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Delaware

000-23143

13-3379479(State or other jurisdiction

of incorporation)

(Commission

File Number)

(IRS Employer

Identification No.)777 Old Saw Mill River Road, Tarrytown, New York

10591(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)Registrant's telephone number, including area code (914) 789-2800





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (seeGeneral Instruction A.2.):








oWritten communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





oSoliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)




oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))




oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))










Item 2.02. Results of Operations and Financial Condition.




Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Nasdaq: PGNX) today announced its operational results for the quarter and year ended December 31, 2011.  A copy of its press release is included in this Report as Exhibit 99.1.




The information furnished pursuant to this Item 2.02 shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section, unless we specifically incorporate it by reference in a document filed under the Exchange Act or the U.S. Securities Act of 1933. We undertake no duty or obligation to publicly update or revise the information so furnished.




Item 9.01.                      Financial Statements and Exhibits.





(d) Exhibits





Exhibit No.                      Description





99.1                                   Press Release dated March 15, 2012.








SIGNATURES








Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.








PROGENICS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.


By:/s/ ROBERT A.
MCKINNEY


Robert A. McKinney


Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President,


Finance & Operations











Date: March 15, 2012
~ 

- ~· 6t " , ,, 

'·\ ' ,, 

. ~ 'l ' ,J 

, ~ ._ __ 

~ 

-

" ' I 

.. ' . ~ • •
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gouverneur Bancorp Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
J. Twyman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes -Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.


May 11, 2005                           By: /s/ ROBERT J. TWYMAN
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Robert J. Twyman
                                           Vice President and Chief Financial
                                           Officer

         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code in accordance with Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall
not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be
deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act
of 1933 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                                       26