alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ANALYZING EXISTING PARTNERSHIPS THROUGH A HEALTH EQUITY LENS | 

Worksheet: Analyzing Existing Partnerships through a 

Health Equity Lens 

Before engaging in new collaborative efforts, it’s important to assess the 

fabric and nature of your current partnerships. 

Who currently sits at your prevention table? Does your table reflect the diversity of your 

community? What skills, expertise, and perspectives do your partners bring? How are your 

relationships with different partners working out? Can you detect any patterns regarding the 

strengths of different relationships? And finally, what steps do you take to support the work of 

partners? What roles have they been invited to play in your work—and do these roles include 

leadership? 

This worksheet is designed to help you develop a brief inventory of who you are working with 

and how. Analyzing existing partnerships will help you see and appreciate the value of current 

partners. It will also help you determine whether the partners you have on board are the right 

ones, given your current prevention priorities, and to see where you may need to recruit new 

partners to fill identified gaps and/or ensure representation from key community groups. 

Instructions 

• List your current partners. For this tool, partners are defined as organizations or 

individuals with whom you share prevention resources. 

• For each partner: 

▪ Write down the community sector this partner represents (Note: Are there any 

sectors missing, given your prevention priorities and populations of focus? Is this 

the most appropriate representative for this sector?)

Identifying Needs and 

Opportunities for Collaboration 
 ANALYZING EXISTING PARTNERSHIPS THROUGH A HEALTH EQUITY LENS | 

▪ Describe the nature of your collaboration (i.e., How do you work together? How

do you support their work?)

▪ Identify the prevention resources the partner contributes (i.e., How does

collaborating with this partner strengthen your prevention efforts? Consider skills,

expertise, and perspectives as well as physical and financial resources.)

▪ Determine the partner’s current level of involvement (i.e., What is the nature of

your collaboration? Has this level of involvement deepened over time? Why or why

not?)

▪ Describe the status of your collaborative relationship (i.e., Is your collaborative

relationship going well? Is this partner still relevant given your current priorities?

Would you like to move the relationship to the next level? How has the way you

have worked with this partner changed over time?)

Current 

Partner

Sector 

Represented 

Nature of the 

Collaboration

Prevention 

Resources 

Shared 

Level of 

Involvement 

Current 

Status 
| 

Current 

Partner 

Sector 

Represented 

Nature of the 

Collaboration

Prevention 

Resources 

Shared 

Level of 

Involvement 

Current 

Status 

SPTAC@edc.org | samhsa.gov/SPTAC
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  For Partners 
-  Counselors 
-  Women's Business Centers 

## Section navigation

-  Lenders 
-  Counselors    -  Small Business Development Centers 
  -  Veterans Business Outreach Centers 
  -  Women's Business Centers 
  -  Community Navigator Pilot Program 
  -  Instructional materials for trainers 
  -  Nexus 
-  SBICs 
-  Surety bond partners and agents 
-  Contracting officials 

# Women's Business Centers

----

## Content

----

## Budget and grant documents

                  - Application for Federal Assistance SF 424
                  - SF 424 A
                  - Annual Budget Summary (B10-B16)
                  - Metrics and Milestones Template for Initial Phase

## Governing documents

                  - WBC Program Reporting Schedule

## Reporting documents

                  - SBA Success Story Form
                  - Nexus
                  - Federal Financial Report- SF 425
                  - Request for Advance or Reimbursement – SF 270
Subject:

From:

To:

A) Memorandum

U.S. Department
of Transportation

Saint Lawrence
Seaway Development
Corporation

Addition of SLSDC Advisory Board Date: December 18, 2015
Quarterly Meeting Minutes to Website

Administrator Sutton di ttn Reply to
Attn of:

All SLSDC Employees

As part of its ongoing efforts to further share and provide useful information to employees and
the general public, I have directed the SLSDC to begin posting the minutes from its quarterly
Advisory Board meetings on its governmental website at www.seaway.dot.gov. Beginning in
January 2016 the SLSDC’s web site will be updated to include SLSDC Advisory Board quarterly
meeting minutes. This additional information on the SLSDC’s web site advances the
Corporation’s use of technology to share information and data to citizens and stakeholders.

Since its creation in 1954 as a federal government corporation, the SLSDC has had a statutorily
mandated five-member Advisory Board, which reviews the general policies of the SLSDC and
advises the Administrator with respect to these policies. The members of the Advisory Board are
appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the U.S. Senate. The Advisory Board
meets quarterly. There are currently four active members sitting on the SLSDC’s Advisory
Board: David McMillan (Chairman), Duluth, Minn.; William Mielke, Waukesha, Wis.; Wenona
Singel, East Lansing, Mich.; and Dr. Arthur Sulzer, Glen Mills, Pa.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 756 

To modify the prohibition on recognition by United States courts of certain 

rights relating to certain marks, trade names, or commercial names. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 12, 2019 

Mr. MENENDEZ (for himself and Mr. RUBIO) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To modify the prohibition on recognition by United States 

courts of certain rights relating to certain marks, trade 

names, or commercial names. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Stolen Trademarks 

5 Honored in America Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF PROHIBITION. 

7 Section 211 of the Department of Commerce and Re8 lated Agencies Appropriations Act, 1999 (as contained in 

9 section 101(b) of division A of Public Law 105–277; 112 

10 Stat. 2681–88) is amended— 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 756 IS

1 (1) in subsection (a)(2)— 

2 (A) by striking ‘‘by a designated national’’; 

3 and 

4 (B) by inserting before the period at the 

5 end the following: ‘‘that was used in connection 

6 with a business or assets that were confiscated 

7 unless the original owner of the mark, trade 

8 name, or commercial name, or the bona fide 

9 successor-in-interest has expressly consented’’; 

10 (2) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘by a des11 ignated national or its successor-in-interest’’; 

12 (3) by redesignating subsection (d) as sub13 section (e); 

14 (4) by inserting after subsection (c) the fol15 lowing: 

16 ‘‘(d) Subsections (a)(2) and (b) of this section shall 

17 apply only if the person or entity asserting the rights knew 

18 or had reason to know at the time when the person or 

19 entity acquired the rights asserted that the mark, trade 

20 name, or commercial name was the same as or substan21 tially similar to a mark, trade name, or commercial name 

22 that was used in connection with a business or assets that 

23 were confiscated.’’; and 

24 (5) in subsection (e), as so redesignated, by 

25 striking ‘‘In this section:’’ and all that follows 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 756 IS

1 through ‘‘(2) The term’’ and inserting ‘‘In this sec2 tion, the term’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
-  Home 

# In This Section

                      -  Learn About the Seaway 
                      -  Interactive Shipping Map and Shipping Schedule 
                      -  Videos about the Seaway 
                      -  Visitor Center 

## Related Links

                  -                                          Press Release - Great Lakes Seaway Announces Port Winners of 2022 Season “Paces...                   

# Press Release - Great Lakes Seaway Announces Port Winners of 2022 Season “Pacesetter Award”

GLS 03-23

Contact: gls@dot.gov

**Great Lakes Seaway Announces Port Winners of 2022 Season “Pacesetter Award”**

WASHINGTON – The U.S. Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation (GLS) announced today that nine U.S. ports in the Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway System received its Robert J. Lewis Pacesetter Award for recording increases in international cargo tonnage shipped through their ports during the 2022 navigation season. 

“Every year, more than 36 million metric tons of cargo pass through the St. Lawrence Seaway, supporting nearly a quarter of a million jobs and made possible by ports throughout the Great Lakes region,” said U.S. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg. “We are proud to announce this year’s winners of the Robert J. Lewis Pacesetter Award, which honors Great Lakes ports that have made significant strides in moving goods through the supply chain so they can reach the communities that need them.” 

More than 237,000 jobs and $35 billion in economic activity are supported annually by the movement of cargoes on the Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway System. The nine ports earning the Robert J. Lewis Pacesetter Award for 2022 are: Port of Buffalo (N.Y.); Port of Chicago (Ill.); Port of Cleveland (Ohio); Port of Manitowoc, (Wis.); Port Milwaukee (Wis.); Port of Monroe (Mich.); Port of Oswego (N.Y.); Ogdensburg Bridge and Port Authority (N.Y.); and Toledo-Lucas County Port Authority (Ohio).

“Congratulations to the nine Great Lakes/Seaway ports being recognized as GLS Pacesetter Award recipients for their achievements during the 2022 Seaway navigation season,” said GLS Administrator Adam Tindall-Schlicht. “The sustained level of high performance is a testament not only to the Seaway System’s importance as a maritime supply chain, but also to the hard work and resiliency of the dedicated men and women throughout the Great Lakes/Seaway port community.”

The Robert J. Lewis Pacesetter Award was established in 1992 to recognize the achievements of U.S. ports whose activities result in increasing international tonnage shipped through the St. Lawrence Seaway, excluding Canada, in comparison with the previous year. The Pacesetter Award name was officially changed in 2001 to posthumously honor the noteworthy career of former GLS Logistics Director Robert J. Lewis, who was instrumental in developing and implementing the GLS’s trade development program.

###
List of Attendees for the Regional Haze: 

Revisions to Provisions Governing Alternative to 

Source-Specific BART Public Hearing

January 17, 2012

Name Affiliation

Phil Lorang US EPA

Martha Keating US EPA

Jan Cortelyou US EPA

Jodi Howard Atlantic Reporters

Gobeail McKinley US EPA
Statewide Family Network (SFN) Pre-Applicant Webinar NOFO 

SM-24-001

March 14, 2024

Questions & Answers

1. Can the SFN program help parents understand and navigate school attendance policies and 

procedures? Yes, supporting families to overcome the barriers leading to school absence falls under the

required activity “Providing workshops addressing the needs of families/caregivers raising children, 

youth, and young adults with SED/COD, including the challenges specific to underserved, culturally, 

racially, and ethnically diverse families” or the required activity, “Providing individual family advocacy 

and support for families raising children with SED [e.g., attending and participating in meetings with 

family members in any system touching their child with a SED/COD.”

2. Is teaching parent leadership an appropriate activity for a SFN grant?

Yes, it falls under the required activity, “Providing leadership development, training, outreach, and 

education for family/caregivers to facilitate and expand their participation in partnering with state and 

community agencies concerning behavioral health policy development and implementation to support 

needed family/caregiver voice, direction, empowerment and participation in treatment and service 

systems improvements.”

3. Can SFN grant activities include presenting at conferences?

Yes, this falls under the required activity, “Attending and participating in local, state, and/or national 

meetings and conferences to provide information about mental health issues affecting children and 

youth with SED/COD and input and feedback about service and system planning.” Of note, the 

presentation topic must be grant relevant topic.

4. Can a SFN grant pay for a parent to attend a leadership training? 

Grant funds can be used to pay for parent leaders and SFN staff to attend leadership training. Please 

review the Funding Limitations/Restrictions of the NOFO as well as SAMHSA’s Standards for Financial 

Management and Standard Funding Restrictions in Section H of the Application Guide on page 22 of the 

NOFO.

5. Can applicants use graphs in their project narratives? SAMHSA does not dictate how you present the 

information in your project narrative.
### §80a–40. Hearings by Commission

Hearings may be public and may be held before the Commission, any member or members thereof, or any officer or officers of the Commission designated by it, and appropriate records thereof shall be kept.

(Aug. 22, 1940, ch. 686, title I, §41, 54 Stat. 842.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of Securities and Exchange Commission, with certain exceptions, to Chairman of such Commission, see Reorg. Plan No. 10 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3175, 64 Stat. 1265, set out under section 78d of this title.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
 
                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
 
The Stockholders and Board of Directors
of THE GILLETTE COMPANY:
 
     We consent to incorporation by reference in the following registration
statements of The Gillette Company and any amendments thereto (1) No. 33-9495 on
Form S-8, (2) No. 2-93230 on Form S-8, (3) Nos. 33-56218 and 33-27916 on Form
S-8 which incorporate by reference therein registration statements on Form S-8
Nos. 2-90276, 2-63951 and 1-50710 and No. 2-41016 on Form S-7, (4) No. 33-54974
on Form S-3, (5) No. 33-50303 on Form S-3, (6) No. 33- 52465 on Form S-8, (7)
No. 33-53257 on Form S-8, (8) No. 33-53258 on Form S-8, (9) No. 33-55051 on Form
S-3, (10) No. 33-59125 on Form S-8, (11) No. 33-63707 on Form S-8 (12) No.
333-16735 on Form S-4, (13) No. 333-19133 on Form S-8, (14), No. 333-25533 on
Form S-8 and (15) 333-44257 on Form S-3 of our report dated January 28, 1998,
relating to the consolidated balance sheet of The Gillette Company and
subsidiary companies as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, consolidated statements
of income, cash flows and stockholders' equity for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 1997 and the Valuation and Qualifying
Account Schedule, which reports appear or are incorporated by reference in the
December 31, 1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Gillette Company.
 
                                            KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP
 
Boston, Massachusetts
March 20, 1998
 
                                       17
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Aurizon Mines Ltd. (the Company) is filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, its annual report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report).

I, Ian S. Walton, Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

(i)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Ian S. Walton

_____________

_________Ian S. Walton 
Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer

March 31, 2010



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Aurizon Mines Ltd. and will be retained by Aurizon Mines Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Email Signature Instructions for Outlook Email**

**Name**

Job Title

Pronouns: they/them

123 Street., Suite 123, North Bethesda, MD  20852

Office: 555.123.4567 Mobile: 555.123.4567

Company/Organization Website

Confidentiality Notice: This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

Here’s how to replace your current signature with this new one:

1. Edit the above signature with your name, phone number, and other information you want to include in your signature.

2. Highlight the entire new signature, including the image and (if desired) the confidentiality notice.

3. Press CTRL+C to copy the signature.

4. Go to Outlook and select “New Email” from the top menu bar.

5. In the new email box, click the “Insert” menu. 

6. Click on the “Signature” icon to display a drop-down menu.

7. Choose “Signatures....” The “Signature and Stationery” box will open.

8. Press “New” and type a name for your new signature (e.g., Recovery Month 2023).

9. Press CTRL+V to paste the signature in the blank space under “Edit signature.” 

**Note:** It is important that you use CTRL+V rather than right-click, paste. Also, please note that the image and tagline may NOT be visible in the signature box, but they ARE there.

10. To make your newly created signature your default signature, select your new signature from the drop-down menu under the “Choose default signature.” Your newly created signature should now appear next to “New Messages:” and “Replies/forwards:” 

**Note:** You may skip this step if you’d like to keep your current signature as the default signature but want to have the new Recovery Month signature as an option.

11. Click “OK” to finish the setup. 

12. If you choose to skip step 10: To use your signature in your emails, select “Insert” and then “Signature” from the top menu bar and select your newly created signature.

13. The image is hyperlinked to the SAMHSA website. No need to hyperlink them yourself.

# image1.png
#### Diana R. Dibble, Appellant, v Janis K. Allen et al., Respondents.

[823 NYS2d 710]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Anthony J. Paris, J.), entered March 13, 2006. The order, among other things, granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated at Supreme Court. Present—Kehoe, J.P., Martoche, Centra, Green and Pine, JJ.
## Frequently Asked Questions

Open All
Close All

## What is Science.gov? addremove

Science.gov is a U.S. government website providing a search tool for finding scientific and technical information from across					top U.S. federal agencies. Science.gov is the U.S. contribution to WorldWideScience.org,					which provides access to science information from national and international scientific databases and portals.

## What does Science.gov contain? addremove

Search results may include scientific and technical reports, peer-reviewed scholarly publications, e.g., accepted manuscripts					and journal articles, digital data, software, conference presentations and proceedings, and other scientific and technical information					that federal agencies publish as a result of their research investments. Additionally, Science.gov provides key information in support					of Open Science which provides users with access to open science initiatives, engagements, and policies in response to the White House					Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) declaration of 2023 as a Year of Open Science; and in response to the 2022 and 2013					Whitehouse memos for Ensuring Free, Immediate, and Equitable Access to Federally Funded Research					(August 25, 2022) and Increasing Access to the Results of Federally Funded Scientific Research					(February 22, 2013). For more information about these activities and policies, see the Open Science & Public Access page.

## How does the search work? addremove

Science.gov simultaneously searches the selected sources using federated search. That is, Science.gov simultaneously launches					and distributes user queries to multiple databases and other sources, then aggregates, ranks and displays top-level results from					all sources. Each result contains a title including a link to the full information, an indication of relevance to the search query					(indicated by blue stars  where more stars indicate greater relevance), an information snippet, and a link to the host agency.

Unlike some third-party search engines that search only the surface web, Science.gov drills down into the deep web, which					contains a vast amount of scientific and technical information. For assistance with questions about how to search Science.gov,					please see the Help page.

## How is Science.gov governed? addremove

Science.gov is governed and supported by CENDI, an interagency working group of senior scientific and technical information managers.					The CENDI.gov and Science.gov websites were developed and are maintained by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of					Scientific and Technical Information, a unit of the Office of Science, in partnership with CENDI. For more information,					visit the OSTI.GOV and CENDI websites.