alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 THAT WERE
FILED WITH THE COMPANY'S REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001101370
<NAME> STONEWALL FINANCIAL LTD.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                         (1)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with the  quarterly  report  of  GoAmerica,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the  quarter  ended  June 30,  2005  filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Donald G. Barnhart,  Chief
Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects,  the consolidated  financial  condition of the Company as of the dates
presented and consolidated  results of operations of the Company for the periods
presented.

Dated: August 11, 2005


                                                     /s/ Donald G. Barnhart
                                                     -----------------------
                                                     Donald G. Barnhart
                                                     Chief Financial Officer

This  certification  has been  furnished  solely  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 9 (Thursday, January 13, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 2369]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-572]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[ Docket No. AD11-6-000]


 Priorities for Addressing Risks to the Reliability of the Bulk-
Power System; Notice of Technical Conference

December 16, 2010.
    Take notice that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission will hold 
a Technical Conference on Tuesday, February 8, 2011 from 10 a.m. to 5 
p.m. This Commissioner-led conference will be held in the Commission 
Meeting Room at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. The conference will be open for the 
public to attend and advance registration is not required. The purpose 
of the conference is to discuss policy issues related to reliability of 
the Bulk-Power System, including priorities for addressing risks to 
reliability.
    The agenda for this conference will be issued at a later date. 
Information on this event will be posted on the Calendar of Events on 
the Commission's Web site, http://www.ferc.gov, prior to the event. The 
conference will be Webcast. Anyone with Internet access who desires to 
listen to this event can do so by navigating to http://www.ferc.gov's 
Calendar of Events and locating this event in the Calendar. The event 
will contain a link to the webcast. The Capitol Connection provides 
technical support for webcasts and offers the option of listening to 
the meeting via phone-bridge for a fee. If you have any questions, 
visit http://www.CapitolConnection.org or call 703-993-3100.
    Commission conferences are accessible under section 508 of the 
Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations, please 
send an e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#412022222432322823282d28353801272433226f262e37"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="83e2e0e0e6f0f0eae1eaefeaf7fac3e5e6f1e0ade4ecf5">[email protected]</span></a> or call toll free 1-866-208-
3372 (voice) or 202-208-1659 (TTY), or send a FAX to 202-208-2106 with 
the required accommodations.
    For more information about this conference, please contact: Sarah 
McKinley, Office of External Affairs, Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, (202) 502-
8368, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4c3f2d3e2d2462212f2725222029350c2a293e2f622b233a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c5b6a4b7a4adeba8a6aeacaba9a0bc85a3a0b7a6eba2aab3">[email protected]</span></a>.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-572 Filed 1-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
DEP ARTMENT OF THE AI R FORCE

HEADQUARTERS AIR FOR CE FLIGHT STANDARDS AGENCY

GLOBAL ACCESS FOR AMERICA 9 June 2016

MEMORANDUM FOR HQ FAA/AGC

- 10

FROM: HQ AFFSA/ XOF

Bldg 4, Room 11 7

6500 S. MacArthur Blvd

Oklahoma City, OK 73169

SUBJECT: FAR Exemption 131 M (Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2001

- 9519 )

1. FAA Exemption 131, was granted to the United States Air Force on 20 Sep 72, as amended

by 131 M on 13 May 2013 , it exempts us from the provisions of Section 91.159 of 14 CFR

that govern operatons for flights conducted under visual flight rules. Our requirem ent to

conduct hurricane reconnaissance flights under the provisions of this exemption remains

unchanged and we hereby request an extension, IAW 14 CFR Part 11.

2. As operations under this exemption have been safely co nducted for the past forty

- four year s,

the Air Force requests your consideration in approving the renewal of this exemption. Since

this is a long

- standing exemption, the Air Force respectfully requests a 3

- year extension with

no changes to the current policy.

3. Please contact me with any questions at (405) 734

- 6950 or e

- mail: hqaffsa.xof@us.af.mil

.

MATTHEW J. NIENDORF, Major , USAF

Chief, Flight Directives Division
### §1311. Rules and regulations

The Secretary shall prescribe such regulations as he determines necessary and desirable to carry out the provisions of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 91–559, §12, Dec. 19, 1970, 84 Stat. 1471.)
§ 415.3 Purpose and findings. ( a ) The Commission hereby finds and determines that the use of flood plains is affected with a public interest due to: ( 1 ) The danger to life and property due to increased flood heights or velocities caused by encroachments.
( 2 ) The danger that materials may be swept onto other lands or downstream to the injury of others.
( 3 ) The requirements of a facility for a waterfront location.
( b ) In order to protect the public interest, the following principles and goals have been determined: ( 1 ) The overall goal is prudent land use within the physical and environmental constraints of the site.
( 2 ) The principle of equal and uniform treatment shall apply to all flood plain users who are similarly situated.
( 3 ) Flood plain use shall not result in nuisance to other properties.
( 4 ) Flood plain use shall not threaten public safety, health and general welfare.
( 5 ) Future land uses in private flood plains shall not result in public expense to protect the property and associated public services from flood damage.
( 6 ) All future public and private flood plain users shall bear the full direct and indirect costs attributable to their use and actions.
( 7 ) Restrictions on flood plain use, and flood hazard information shall be widely publicized.
( 8 ) Land and water use regulations of responsible units of government shall not impair or conflict with the flood plain use standards duly adopted for the basin, except as provided for in § 415.42(a) of this part.
( 9 ) Plans for land and water use adopted by responsible agencies shall not impair or conflict with these flood plain use standards.
( 10 ) No action of any unit of government shall impair or conflict with these flood plain use standards.
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender.

STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Announces Industry Forum on Changes to the Section 504 Repair Loan and Grant 

Program

 WASHINGTON, Sept. 13, 2019 – USDA Rural Housing Service Administrator Bruce Lammers today 

announced an industry forum scheduled for September 19, 2019 at 2 p.m. Eastern Time to learn more about 

recent changes to the Section 504 Single Family Housing Repair Loan and Grant Program. 

 The Section 504 program helps very-low income homeowners repair, improve, or modernize their homes, 

including grants to elderly homeowners to remove health, safety hazard, or accessibility barriers. 

 Non-profit loan packagers are encouraged to learn more about this program which provides measurable 

results in helping rural communities build robust and sustainable economies through strategic investments in 

infrastructure, partnerships and innovation. The forum objectives include:

• An overview of recent program changes

• A discussion of Procedure Notice 527

• An opportunity for industry questions and answers 

 Contact Danielle Eason at (202) 690-1530 or email danielle.eason@usda.gov for detailed information on how 

to join the industry forum. 

 Funding information for very-low income homeowners in rural areas, and forum handouts are available 

through USDA’s Single Family Housing Repair Loan and Grant Program (Section 504 Program). Applications 

for loan and grant funds are accepted year-round. This program supports the recommendations made in the 

Report to the President of the United States from the Task Force on Agriculture and Rural Prosperity (PDF, 5.4 

MB) to improve and provide quality housing in rural America. 

 Additional information on the Section 504 Program and how to apply for funding is available online at 

www.rd.usda.gov/programs-services/single-family-housing-repair-loans-grants.

#
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7733

ALBERT C. BURGESS, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Frank D. Whitney, 

Chief District Judge. (1:09-cr-00017-GCM-DLH-1; 1:16-cv-00377-

FDW) 

Submitted: March 14, 2017 Decided: March 17, 2017

Before FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Albert Charles Burgess, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Kimlani M. Ford, 

Cortney Randall, Edward R. Ryan, Assistant United States 

Attorneys, Charlotte, North Carolina, Amy Elizabeth Ray, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for 

Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2

PER CURIAM: 

Albert Charles Burgess, Jr., seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order dismissing as successive his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 

(2012) motion.* The order is not appealable unless a circuit 

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court 

denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the 

denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

 * Burgess filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 

28 U.S.C. § 1651 (2012). The district court construed the 

petition as a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 challenging the 2010 

criminal judgment entered following Burgess’ convictions under 

18 U.S.C. § 2252(a) (2012). Burgess has not challenged that 

ruling on appeal. 
3

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Burgess has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
### SUBCHAPTER I—WEIGHTS, MEASURES, AND STANDARDS GENERALLY
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Gilman + Ciocia, Inc. (the
"Company") for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004, as amended by this Form
10K/A, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"),I, Michael P. Ryan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


By: /s/ Michael P. Ryan
    --------------------------
Name: Michael P. Ryan
      Chief Executive Officer

Date: February 1, 2005
#    Opioids

The misuse of prescription opioids and use of heroin is one of the most significant public health issues in the United States. Opioid abuse claims more lives than motor vehicle crashes. Providing access to effective care may prevent misuse and the consequences, such as overdose. Our researchers study the causes of the crisis and the effectiveness of the programs and policies implemented in response.

### Categories Related to Opioids

                      - Alcohol
                      - Nicotine
                      - Illicit Stimulants
                      - Adolescents as Population Group
                      - Alcohol Use Disorder
                      - Pain Relievers
                      - Mature Adults as Population Group
                      - Marijuana
                      - Sedatives
                      - Benzodiazepines
                      - Methadone
                      - Heroin
                      - Illegal Drugs
                      - Antidepressants
                      - Buprenorphine

Latest in Opioids

Reducing Substance Use Among Clients in the Pregnant and Postpartum Women Pilot Program

Spotlight, Evaluation : Other SAMHSA Data Set - February 28, 2024

2020 Methodological Summary and Definitions

Reference Material : National Survey on Drug Use and Health - October 25, 2021

2019 NSDUH Detailed Tables

Data Table : National Survey on Drug Use and Health - September 11, 2020

2018 NSDUH Detailed Tables

Data Table : National Survey on Drug Use and Health - August 20, 2019

2020 NSDUH Annual National Report

Annual Report : National Survey on Drug Use and Health - October 25, 2021

View All
From: Armstrong, Ashley [mailto:Ashley.Armstrong@EE.Doe.Gov]

Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 11:00 AM

To: Armstrong, Ashley Subject: Request for Information

- Alternative Efficiency Determination Methods and Alternate Rating
Methods

Good Afternoon, The U.S. Department of E nergy is announcing the issuance of a Notice requesting information and data related to the use of computer simulations, mathematical methods, and other alternative methods of determining the efficiency of certain types of consumer products and

commercial and industrial equipment. The Request for Information is attached to this email and should be available on the Certification and Enforcement website shortly (See http://www.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/certification_enforcement.html .)

Best Regards, Ashley
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7974

DELANO ANTONIO MIDDLETON, Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus DOCTOR PARINA, Senior Physician, FCI Estill, SC; VENANTUS ENEJE, Physicians Assistant, FCI Estill SC, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (CA-04-617-0-26) Submitted: March 24, 2005 Decided: March 30, 2005 Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Delano Antonio Middleton, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). PER CURIAM: Delano Antonio Middleton appeals the district court’s order accepting and adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge; summarily dismissing his Bivens * action based on deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs; and dismissing without prejudice his claims for medical malpractice and medical negligence for failure to comply with the prerequisites for pursuing these claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2000). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Middleton that failure to timely file objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Middleton failed to object to the magistrate judge’s recommendation. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned that failure to object will waive appellate review. See Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Middleton has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.- 3 - We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 381.220 Definition of “State”.

For purposes of this subpart, the term “State” means any State (including the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico) or organized territory.
### Part C—General and Miscellaneous
###### Editorial Note on Part 0

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 0 appear at 73 FR 73 FR 54947, Sept. 24, 2008.

#### § 0.21 Authorizing intervention by the Government in certain cases.

The Solicitor General may in consultation with each agency or official concerned, authorize intervention by the Government in cases involving the constitutionality of acts of Congress.
### §7801. Definitions

As used in this chapter, the following definitions apply:

#### (1) Agency contract

The term "agency contract" means an oral or written agreement in which a student athlete authorizes a person to negotiate or solicit on behalf of the student athlete a professional sports contract or an endorsement contract.

#### (2) Athlete agent

The term "athlete agent" means an individual who enters into an agency contract with a student athlete, or directly or indirectly recruits or solicits a student athlete to enter into an agency contract, and does not include a spouse, parent, sibling, grandparent, or guardian of such student athlete, any legal counsel for purposes other than that of representative agency, or an individual acting solely on behalf of a professional sports team or professional sports organization.

#### (3) Athletic director

The term "athletic director" means an individual responsible for administering the athletic program of an educational institution or, in the case that such program is administered separately, the athletic program for male students or the athletic program for female students, as appropriate.

#### (4) Commission

The term "Commission" means the Federal Trade Commission.

#### (5) Endorsement contract

The term "endorsement contract" means an agreement under which a student athlete is employed or receives consideration for the use by the other party of that individual's person, name, image, or likeness in the promotion of any product, service, or event.

#### (6) Intercollegiate sport

The term "intercollegiate sport" means a sport played at the collegiate level for which eligibility requirements for participation by a student athlete are established by a national association for the promotion or regulation of college athletics.

#### (7) Professional sports contract

The term "professional sports contract" means an agreement under which an individual is employed, or agrees to render services, as a player on a professional sports team, with a professional sports organization, or as a professional athlete.

#### (8) State

The term "State" includes a State of the United States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, or any territory or insular possession subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.

#### (9) Student athlete

The term "student athlete" means an individual who engages in, is eligible to engage in, or may be eligible in the future to engage in, any intercollegiate sport. An individual who is permanently ineligible to participate in a particular intercollegiate sport is not a student athlete for purposes of that sport.

(Pub. L. 108–304, §2, Sept. 24, 2004, 118 Stat. 1125.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 108–304, §1, Sept. 24, 2004, 118 Stat. 1125, provided that: "This Act [enacting this chapter] may be cited as the 'Sports Agent Responsibility and Trust Act'."
### SUBCHAPTER XXV—JEAN LAFITTE NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK AND PRESERVE