alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Enclosure Page 2 

FCIC Interpretation of Procedure 

Risk Management Agency Interpretation of FCIC Provisions:

Subject: Request dated February 25, 2022, to the Risk Management Agency for an interpretation of 

the 2019 Whole-Farm Revenue Protection (WFRP) Pilot Policy regarding whether Section 2(e)(1)

allows an insured to correct a Social Security Number (SSN) or Employer Identification Number 

(EIN) that was inadvertently reported incorrectly. 

The relevent policy provision provided by the requestor is Section 2(e): 

2. Application. 

**** 

(e) With respect to SSNs or EINs required on your application: 

(1) Your application will not be accepted and no insurance will be provided for the year 

of application if the application does not contain your SSN or EIN. If your 

application contains an incorrect SSN or EIN for you, your application will be 

considered not to have been accepted, no insurance will be provided for the year of 

application and for any subsequent policy years, as applicable, and such policies will 

be void if: 

(i) You do not correct the number; or 

(ii) You correct the SSN or EIN but: 

(A) You cannot prove that any error was inadvertent (Simply stating the error 

was inadvertent is not sufficient to prove the error was inadvertent); or 

(B) It is determined that the incorrect number would have allowed you to 

obtain disproportionate benefits under the crop insurance program, you 

are determined to be ineligible for insurance or you could avoid an 

obligation or requirement under any State or Federal law; and 

Interpretation Submitted by Requestor(s)

The requestor’s interpretation of Section 2(e)(1) of the 2019 WFRP Pilot Policy is that an insured has 

the right to correct an incorrect SSN or EIN included on its application and to establish to the 

Approved Insurance Provider (AIP) that the inclusion of the incorrect SSN or EIN was inadvertent and 

that the insured did not obtain disproportionate benefits under the crop insurance program to maintain 

or retain eligibility.

Federal Crop Insurance Corporation Determination

FCIC agrees with the requestor’s interpretation that Section 2(e)(1) allows an insured to correct an 

incorrect SSN or EIN provided the insured can prove, other than a simple statement, that the error was 

inadvertent. FCIC also agrees with the requestor’s interpretation that the insured will maintain their 

eligibility if the AIP determines the incorrect SSN or EIN did not allow the insured to obtain 

disproportionate crop insurance benefits or avoid an obligation or requirement under any State or 

Federal Law. 
Enclosure Page 3

FCIC Interpretation of Procedure

In accordance with section 33(a)(1) of the WFRP Pilot Policy, this FCIC interpretation is generally 

applicable and binding in any mediation or arbitration. In accordance with section 33(a)(1), any 

appeal of this interpretation must be in accordance with 7 C.F.R. part 11.
### SUBCHAPTER III—FRAMEWORK FOR INTERAGENCY RESPONSE
### §4603a. Study and report by Semiconductor Technology Council

#### (a) Study and report

Not later than February 1, 1989, and annually thereafter for each fiscal year in which appropriated funds are expended for Sematech the Semiconductor Technology Council established under section 4603(a) of this title shall conduct a study and submit a report to the Governmental Affairs Committee and the Armed Services Committee of the Senate and to appropriate committees of the House of Representatives concerning Federal participation in Sematech. The study and report shall be conducted under the direction of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Technology.

#### (b) Council recommendations and report

The Council shall include in the report submitted under subsection (a) the following:

(1) identification of potential sources of Federal funding from department and agency budgets for Sematech and recommendations concerning methods and terms of Federal financial participation in Sematech, including grants, loans, loan guarantees, and contributions in kind. The feasibility of methods of Federal recoupment shall also be considered;

(2) definition and assessment of continued Federal participation in Sematech including, but not limited to, issues of technology research and development, civilian and defense industrial base objectives and initiatives, and commercialization. The report shall include a summary of the most recent plans, milestones, and cost estimates for Sematech, including any changes and alterations, and shall comment on Sematech's accomplishments and shortfalls in the preceding fiscal year;

(3) coordination of inter-agency participation, including all matters pertaining to Federal funding and decisionmaking, and other issues regarding Federal participation in Sematech; and

(4) any other issues and questions the Council deems appropriate shall be considered.

(Pub. L. 100–418, title V, §5422, Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1468; Pub. L. 102–245, title I, §103(e), Feb. 14, 1992, 106 Stat. 9; Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title II, §263(g), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1610.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988, and not as part of part F of title II of division A of Pub. L. 100–180 which comprises this subchapter.

#### Amendments

1993—Pub. L. 103–160 substituted "Semiconductor Technology Council" for "Advisory Council on Federal Participation in Sematech" in section catchline and subsec. (a).

1992—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 102–245 substituted "Technology" for "Economic Affairs".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on Governmental Affairs of Senate changed to Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of Senate, effective Jan. 4, 2005, by Senate Resolution No. 445, One Hundred Eighth Congress, Oct. 9, 2004.
#### § 590.522 Egg products processing room operations.

Each egg used in processed egg products must be broken in a sanitary manner and examined to ensure that the contents are acceptable for human consumption.

[85 FR 68680, Oct. 29, 2020]
### SUBCHAPTER XXVI—THEODORE ROOSEVELT NATIONAL PARK
AMENDMENT TO THE COASTCAST CORPORATION    SELECTED EMPLOYEES PENSION PLAN

This Amendment to The Coastcast Corporation Selected Employees Pension Plan (the "Plan"), made pursuant to the right to amend reserved in Section 10.1 of
the Plan, amends and modifies the Plan as follows:

1.    Effective
June 12, 2000, Sections 5.1(i) and (j) of the Plan are hereby amended and new subsections (k), (l) and (m) are hereby added at the end thereof to read as
follows:



2.    Effective
as of October 1, 2000, the heading of Section V of Schedule A of the Plan shall be revised to read as follows:



3.    Effective
as of October 1, 2000, the following Section VI shall be added to Schedule A of the Plan:



1

---



4.    Except
as amended above the Plan shall continue in full force and effect without any changes.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company by its duly authorized officer, has caused this Amendment to be executed this 23rd day of October, 2001.

| |  | COASTCAST CORPORATION
| |  | ---------------------
| |  | By:                  

2

---

QuickLinks
### §1338a. Transportation of captured animals; procedures and prohibitions applicable

In administering this chapter, the Secretary may use or contract for the use of helicopters or, for the purpose of transporting captured animals, motor vehicles. Such use shall be undertaken only after a public hearing and under the direct supervision of the Secretary or of a duly authorized official or employee of the Department. The provisions of section 47(a) of title 18 shall not be applicable to such use. Such use shall be in accordance with humane procedures prescribed by the Secretary. Nothing in this chapter shall be deemed to limit the authority of the Secretary in the management of units of the National Park System, and the Secretary may, without regard either to the provisions of this chapter, or the provisions of section 47(a) of title 18, use motor vehicles, fixed-wing aircraft, or helicopters, or to contract for such use, in furtherance of the management of the National Park System, and section 47(a) of title 18 shall be applicable to such use.

(Pub. L. 92–195, §9, as added Pub. L. 94–579, title IV, §404, Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2775; amended Pub. L. 104–333, div. I, title VIII, §803(a), Nov. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 4186.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in last sentence, was in the original "this title", and was translated as reading "this Act", meaning the Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act which enacted this chapter, to reflect the probable intent of Congress, because that Act does not contain titles.

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–333 inserted at end "Nothing in this chapter shall be deemed to limit the authority of the Secretary in the management of units of the National Park System, and the Secretary may, without regard either to the provisions of this chapter, or the provisions of section 47(a) of title 18, use motor vehicles, fixed-wing aircraft, or helicopters, or to contract for such use, in furtherance of the management of the National Park System, and section 47(a) of title 18 shall be applicable to such use."
#### § 4.70 Applicability.

This subpart applies to any application for license issued solely for a transmission line that transmits power from a licensed water power project to the point of junction with the distribution system or with the interconnected primary transmission system.

[Order 184, 46 FR 55942, Nov. 13, 1981, as amended by Order 2002, 68 FR 51120, Aug. 25, 2003; 68 FR 61742, Oct. 30, 2003]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-50206

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

SARAH ANN MORGAN,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:09-CR-2918-2

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, GARZA, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

The attorney appointed to represent Sarah Ann Morgan has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967). Morgan has not filed a response. Our independent review

of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 15, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-50206 Document: 00511382479 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/15/2011
### §157d. Additional boundary revision; acquisition of lands and interests

The boundaries of Big Bend National Park, established by the Act of June 20, 1935 (16 U.S.C. 156), are hereby revised to include the lands and interests therein, together with all improvements thereon, within the area comprising approximately sixty-seven thousand one hundred and twenty-five acres as generally depicted on the map entitled "Harte Ranch Addition, Big Bend National Park", numbered 155/80,044 and dated September 1987. Such map shall be on file and available for public inspection in the offices of the National Park Service, Department of the Interior. The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to acquire lands and interests therein, together with all improvements thereon, within the addition described in such map by donation, purchase with donated or appropriated funds, or exchange.

(Pub. L. 100–201, Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1328.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Act of June 20, 1935, referred to in text, is act June 30, 1935, ch. 283, 49 Stat. 393, which is classified to sections 156, 157, and 158 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.
# C_2010234EN.01004802.xml

| 28.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/48

---

Action brought on 25 June 2010 — Milux v OHMI (IMPLANTCONTROL)

(Case T-284/10)

()

2010/C 234/86

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Milux Holding S.A. (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: J. Bojs, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 3 June 2010 in case R 1438/2009-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 3 June 2010 in case R 1438/2009-4;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘IMPLANTCONTROL’ for goods and services in classes 9, 10 and 44

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the examiner: Refused the application for a Community trade mark

Decision of the examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal misapplied the principle of non-discrimination to the facts of this case; in the alternative, infringement of Articles 7(1)(b) and 7(1)(c) of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal erred in its conclusion that the trade mark applied for does not possess sufficient inherent distinctiveness.

Pleas in law:

---
Editorial Note on Part 0
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 0 appear at 73 FR 73 FR 54947, Sept. 24, 2008.

§ 0.120 General functions. The Director, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services shall: ( a ) Exercise the powers and perform the functions vested in the Attorney General by title I and subtitle H of title III of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 (Pub. L. 103-322); and
( b ) Perform such other duties and functions relating to policing and law enforcement as may be specially assigned by the Attorney General or the Associate Attorney General.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 51 (Wednesday, March 16, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14407-14413]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6079]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2011-N-0109]


Exchange of Letters Between Dr. Murray M. Lumpkin, Deputy 
Commissioner, International Programs, Food and Drug Administration and 
Mr. Martin Heraghty, Assistant Secretary General, Department of 
Agriculture, Fisheries and Food of Ireland Concerning Certification 
Requirements for Caseins, Caseinates, and Mixtures Thereof Exported 
From Ireland to the United States

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is providing notice of 
exchange of letters between Dr. Murray M. Lumpkin, Deputy Commissioner, 
International and Special Programs, FDA and Mr. Martin Heraghty, 
Assistant Secretary General, Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and 
Food (DAFF), concerning certification requirements for caseins, 
caseinates, and mixtures thereof exported from Ireland to the United 
States.
    The mutual goals of FDA and DAFF in establishing certification 
requirements for caseins, caseinates, and mixtures thereof exported 
from Ireland to the United States are to assure that contaminated 
products will not be imported into the United States and to minimize 
the need for extensive FDA audit sampling of these products from 
Ireland. DAFF and FDA have a history of cooperation on this issue and 
it is, therefore, desirable that the two Agencies continue to cooperate 
to maintain and improve consumer protection.

DATES: The agreement became effective November 10, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David P. Kelly, Office of 
International Programs, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New 
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 31, rm. 3404, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-
796-8373, Fax: 301-595-7941.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 21 CFR 20.108(c), which 
states that all written agreements and understandings between FDA and 
others shall be published in the Federal Register, the Agency is 
publishing notice of this agreement.

    Dated: March 10, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P

[[Page 14408]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16MR11.008


[[Page 14409]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16MR11.009


[[Page 14410]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16MR11.010


[[Page 14411]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16MR11.011


[[Page 14412]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16MR11.012


[[Page 14413]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16MR11.013

[FR Doc. 2011-6079 Filed 3-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-C
§ 16.105 Exemption of Foreign Terrorist Tracking Task Force System. ( a ) The following system of records is exempt from 5 U.S.C. 552a, subsections (c)(3), (d)(1), (2), (3) and (4), and (e)(1) and (4)(I): Flight Training Candidates File System (JUSTICE/FTTTF-001). This exemption applies only to the extent that information is subject to exemption pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(1).
( b ) Exemption from the particular subsections is justified for the following reasons: ( 1 ) From subsection (c)(3) because making available to a record subject the accounting of disclosures could reveal information that is classified in the interest of national security.
( 2 ) From subsection (d)(1), (2), (3) and (4) because access to and amendment of certain portions of records within the system would tend to reveal or compromise information classified in the interest of national security.
( 3 ) From subsection (e)(1) because it is often impossible to determine in advance if information obtained will be relevant for the purposes of conducting the risk analysis for flight training candidates.
( 4 ) From subsection (e)(4)(I) to the extent that this subsection is interpreted to require more detail regarding the record sources in this system than have been published in the Federal Register. Should the subsection be so interpreted, exemption from this provision is necessary because greater specificity concerning the sources of these records could compromise national security.
[Order No. 278-2002, 67 FR 51756, Aug. 9, 2002]
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Document Search 
-  Eligible NAICS For The Women-Owned Small Business Federal Contracting Program 

# Eligible NAICS for the Women-Owned Small Business Federal Contracting program

## About this document and download

To help provide a level playing field for women business owners, the government limits competition for certain contracts to businesses that participate in the Women-Owned Small Business Federal Contracting Program (WOSB Program).

These contracts are for specific industries where women-owned small businesses are substantially underrepresented. Some contracts are restricted further to economically disadvantaged women-owned small businesses (EDWOSBs). SBA maintains a list of those eligible industries and their North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes.

Of the 733 eligible industries, 626 are designated for limited competition among all WOSB Program participants, and 107 are eligible for competition among only SBA-certified EDWOSBs.

Congress requires SBA to conduct a study every five years to identify industries in which small businesses owned and controlled by women are underrepresented in the Federal marketplace.  Please visit the most recent study. 

Download .xlsx file (Effective date: October 1, 2022)

Download .csv file (Effective date: October 1, 2022)

  Download  .xlsx

**Effective**

**Related Programs**    Related programs:  

##                 Variations of this document            

-         Version      2022 EDWOSB and WOSB NAICS |               Effective:      October 1, 2022 |        File size: 34KB |          Download      .xlsx        for 2022 EDWOSB and WOSB NAICS / October 1, 2022       
-         Version      2022 EDWOSB and WOSB NAICS |               Effective:      October 1, 2023 |        File size: 38KB |          Download      .csv        for 2022 EDWOSB and WOSB NAICS / October 1, 2023       
-         Version      FY 2022 WOSB NAICS Codes |               Effective:      March 18, 2022 |        File size: 37KB |          Download      .xlsx        for FY 2022 WOSB NAICS Codes / March 18, 2022       
-         Version      FY 2022 WOSB NAICS Codes |               Effective:      March 18, 2022 |        File size: 39KB |          Download      .csv        for FY 2022 WOSB NAICS Codes / March 18, 2022       
-         Version      2017 WOSB Program NAICS Codes |               Effective:      October 1, 2017 |        File size: 85KB |          Download      .xlsx        for 2017 WOSB Program NAICS Codes / October 1, 2017       
-         Version      FY 2017 EDWOSB NAICS |             File size: 47KB |          Download      .pdf        for FY 2017 EDWOSB NAICS /        
-         Version      FY 2016 WOSB NAICS |             File size: 153KB |          Download      .pdf        for FY 2016 WOSB NAICS /        

##                 Related documents            

-        Report          Women-Owned Small Business NAICS analysis
§ 2.71 Application for parole. ( a ) A prisoner (including a committed youth offender) desiring to apply for parole shall execute an application form as prescribed by the Commission. Such forms shall be available at each institution and shall be provided to a prisoner who is eligible for parole consideration. The Commission may then conduct an initial hearing or grant an effective date of parole on the record. A prisoner who receives an initial hearing need not apply for subsequent hearings.
( b ) To the extent practicable, the initial hearing for an eligible adult prisoner who has applied for parole shall be held at least 180 days prior to such prisoner's date of eligibility for parole. The initial hearing for a committed youth offender shall be scheduled during the first 120 days after admission to the institution that is responsible for developing his rehabilitative program.
( c ) A prisoner may knowingly and intelligently waive any parole consideration on a form provided for that purpose. A prisoner who declines either to apply for or waive parole consideration shall be deemed to have waived parole consideration.
( d ) A prisoner who waives parole consideration may later apply for parole and be heard during the next visit of the Commission to the institution at which the prisoner is confined, provided that the prisoner has applied for parole at least 60 days prior to the first day of the month in which such visit of the Commission occurs. In no event, however, shall such prisoner be heard at an earlier date than that set forth in paragraph (b) of this section.
#### § 706.101 Purpose.

The maintenance of unusually high standards of honesty, integrity, impartiality, and conduct by employees and special Government employees is essential to assure the proper performance of the Water Resources Council's (hereafter referred to as the Council) business and the maintenance of confidence by citizens in their Government. The avoidance of misconduct and conflicts of interest on the part of employees and special Government employees through informed judgment is indispensable to the maintenance of these standards. To accord with these concepts, this part sets forth the Council's regulations prescribing standards of conduct and responsibilities and governing statements of employment and financial interests for employees and special Government employees.