alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012366EN.01001501.xml

| 24.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 366/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 366/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 September 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) (United Kingdom)) — Field Fisher Waterhouse LLP v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs

(Case C-392/11) (1)

1

(VAT - Exemption for leasing of immovable property - Leasing of commercial premises - Services connected with the leasing - Classification of the transaction for VAT purposes - Transaction consisting of a single supply or several independent supplies)

2012/C 366/24

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Referring court

First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber)

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Field Fisher Waterhouse LLP

Applicant:

Defendant: Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) — Interpretation of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1) — Exemptions for other activities — Scope of the VAT exemption for the leasing of immovable property — Inclusion of charges for certain management and maintenance services for the building and the common parts — Classification of the transaction, for VAT purposes, as a single supply or as independent supplies — Interpretation of the Court's judgment of 11 June 2009 in Case C-572/07 RLRE Tellmer Property

RLRE Tellmer Property

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as meaning that the leasing of immovable property and the supplies of services linked to that leasing, such as those at issue in the main proceedings, may constitute a single supply from the point of view of value added tax. The fact that the lease gives the landlord the right to terminate it if the tenant fails to pay the service charges supports the view that there is a single supply, but does not necessarily constitute the decisive element for the purpose of assessing whether there is such a supply. On the other hand, the fact that services such as those at issue in the main proceedings could in principle be supplied by a third party does not allow the conclusion that they cannot, in the circumstances of the dispute in the main proceedings, constitute a single supply. It is for the referring court to determine whether, in the light of the interpretative guidance provided by the Court in this judgment and having regard to the particular circumstances of the case, the transactions in question are so closely linked to each other that they must be regarded as constituting a single supply of the leasing of immovable property.

---

(1)  OJ C 282, 24.9.2011.

1

---
Helena

National Forest

Elkhorn

Mountains

Beaverhead/Deerlodge

National Forest

Butte

Boulder

Jefferson

County

Silver Bow

County

Deerlodge

County

Whitehall

Township

8 N.

Township

6 N.

Elk Park

Anaconda

Mount Haggin

Wildlife

Management Area

Beaverhead/Deerlodge

National Forest

Beaverhead/Deerlodge

National Forest

Pipestone

Humbug

Spires

W

hitetail Basi

n

Township

4 N.

Range 13 W.

Range 11 W. Range 9 W.

Range 7 W. Range 5 W.

Range 3 W.

Range 7 W.

Township

2 S.

Range 11 W.

Range 1 W.
§ 115.264 Staff first responder duties. ( a ) Upon learning of an allegation that a resident was sexually abused, the first security staff member to respond to the report shall be required to: ( 1 ) Separate the alleged victim and abuser;
( 2 ) Preserve and protect any crime scene until appropriate steps can be taken to collect any evidence;
( 3 ) If the abuse occurred within a time period that still allows for the collection of physical evidence, request that the alleged victim not take any actions that could destroy physical evidence, including, as appropriate, washing, brushing teeth, changing clothes, urinating, defecating, smoking, drinking, or eating; and
( 4 ) If the abuse occurred within a time period that still allows for the collection of physical evidence, ensure that the alleged abuser does not take any actions that could destroy physical evidence, including, as appropriate, washing, brushing teeth, changing clothes, urinating, defecating, smoking, drinking, or eating.
( b ) If the first staff responder is not a security staff member, the responder shall be required to request that the alleged victim not take any actions that could destroy physical evidence and then notify security staff.
### §4105. Administration

The Commission may—

(1) in accordance with the civil service laws and subchapter III of chapter 53 of title 5, appoint and fix the compensation of an Executive Director and necessary additional staff personnel, but not to exceed a total of seven compensated personnel;

(2) procure temporary and intermittent services as authorized by section 3109 of title 5;

(3) enter into contracts and procure supplies, services, and personal property;

(4) enter into agreements with the General Services Administration for the procurement of necessary financial and administrative services, for which payment shall be made by reimbursement from funds of the Commission in amounts to be agreed upon by the Commission and the Administrator of the General Services Administration; and

(5) appoint, and accept without compensation the services of, scientists and engineering specialists to be advisors to the Commission. Each advisor may be allowed travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, as authorized by section 5703 of title 5. Except for the purposes of chapter 81 of title 5 (relating to compensation for work injuries) and chapter 171 of title 28 (relating to tort claims), an advisor appointed under this paragraph shall not be considered an employee of the United States for any purpose.

(Pub. L. 98–373, title I, §106, July 31, 1984, 98 Stat. 1245; Pub. L. 101–609, §5, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3125.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1990—Par. (5). Pub. L. 101–609 added par. (5).
### §78ii. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act June 6, 1934, ch. 404, title II, §210, 48 Stat. 908, transferred the powers, duties and functions of the Federal Trade Commission under subchapter I of chapter 2A of this title to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Pending proceedings before the Federal Trade Commission were continued before the Securities and Exchange Commission.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       4,447,810
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,538,039
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    165,608
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,144,551
<PP&E>                                      20,771,190
<DEPRECIATION>                              16,415,290
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,846,760
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          903,718
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    339,407
<COMMON>                                     2,687,211
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,797,104
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,846,760
<SALES>                                     12,583,938
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,328,184
<CGS>                                       12,070,771
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,943,742
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (615,558)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    62,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (677,558)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (677,558)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)
        

</TABLE>
#   Comparison Between 2021-2022 NSDUH State Prevalence Estimates

Compare state and regional estimates for 35 measures of substance use and mental health using p-values. The tables are a companion to the state-level estimates from the 2021-2022 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH). This collection consists of several sets of p-value tables, along with a guide for their use in determining if differences between two geographic areas are statistically significant.

National Survey on Drug Use and Health

### Part of Collection:

2021-2022 NSDUH State Estimates of Substance Use and Mental Disorders

                        -  In This Collection 
                        -  Report Resources 

### In This Collection

2021-2022 NSDUH: Guide to Comparison of Population Percentages Across Geographies

Collected Date: 2021-2022 | Published Date: February 15, 2024 | Type: National Survey on Drug Use and Health

2021-2022 NSDUH: P-Value Tables for Geographic Comparison

Collected Date: 2021-2022 | Published Date: February 15, 2024 | Type: National Survey on Drug Use and Health

### Report Resources

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Data Archive (SAMHDA)'s page about NSDUH.

 < Back to Main content
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
"THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION FOR THE 6 MONTHS ENDED JUNE
30, 1995, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS."
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1995
<CASH>                                              22
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,034
<ALLOWANCES>                                        29
<INVENTORY>                                      1,262
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,456
<PP&E>                                          11,939
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,311
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,470
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,139
<BONDS>                                          4,224
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            72
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,014
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,470
<SALES>                                          7,186
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,186
<CGS>                                            4,979
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,979
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   457
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 205
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    829
<INCOME-TAX>                                       332
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                497
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       497
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     5.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     5.47
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 744 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 744

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend section 175b of title 18, United States Code, to correct a 
                           scrivener's error.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Effective Prosecution of Possession 
of Biological Toxins and Agents Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON THE POSSESSION OF BIOLOGICAL TOXINS AND AGENTS.

    Section 175b of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking ``(a)(1) No restricted'' and all 
                that follows through the end of paragraph (1) and 
                inserting the following:
    ``(a) Offense.--
            ``(1) In general.--It shall be unlawful for a restricted 
        person to--
                    ``(A) ship, transport, or possess in or affecting 
                interstate or foreign commerce any biological agent or 
                toxin described in paragraph (2); or
                    ``(B) receive any biological agent or toxin 
                described in paragraph (2) that has been shipped or 
                transported in interstate or foreign commerce.
            ``(2) Agents and toxins covered.--A biological agent or 
        toxin described in this paragraph is a biological agent or 
        toxin that--
                    ``(A) is listed as a non-overlap or overlap select 
                biological agent or toxin under part 73 of title 42, 
                Code of Federal Regulations, pursuant to section 351A 
                of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262a); and
                    ``(B) is not excluded or exempted under part 73 of 
                title 42, Code of Federal Regulations.''; and
                    (B) by striking ``(2) Whoever'' and inserting ``(3) 
                Penalty.--Whoever'' and adjusting the margin 
                accordingly; and
            (2) in subsection (d), in the matter preceding paragraph 
        (1), by inserting ``Definitions.--'' before ``In this 
        section:''.

            Passed the Senate May 16, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 744

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To amend section 175b of title 18, United States Code, to correct a 
                           scrivener's error.
```
Impacted Regulations

Part 60 – Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources (NSPS)

Subpart A – General Provisions - Revisions to incorporate Uniform Standards and make 

other changes.

Subpart Ja – Petroleum Refineries – Reconsideration.

Subpart Jb(?) – Petroleum Refineries - Refinery Greenhouse Gas Emissions.

Subparts K, Ka, and Kb – Tanks - Revisions to incorporate Uniform Standard for Tanks 

and CVS/CD.

Subparts GGGa and VVVa – Petroleum Refinery Equipment Leaks - Reconsideration and 

revisions to incorporate Uniform Standard for Equipment Leaks and CVS/CD.

Subpart QQQ Subpart QQQ – Refinery Refinery Wastewater Wastewater - Revisions Revisions to incorporate Uniform Standard for to incorporate Uniform Standard for 

Wastewater and CVS/CD.

Part 61 – National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants

Subpart A – General Provisions - Revisions to incorporate Uniform Standards.

Subparts J and V – Benzene Equipment Leaks - Reconsideration and revisions to 

incorporate Uniform Standard for Equipment Leaks, CVS/CD.

Subpart Y – Benzene Tanks – Revisions to incorporate Uniform Standard for Tanks.

Subpart FF – Benzene Wastes - Revisions to incorporate Uniform Standard for wastewater 

and CVS/CD and make other changes.

1
Impacted Regulations

Part 63 – National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for 

Source Categories

Subpart A – General Provisions - Revisions to incorporate Uniform Standards and make other changes.

Subparts F, G, H (HON) – SOCMI Manufacturing - Revisions to incorporate Uniform Standards and 

make other changes.

Subpart CC – Petroleum Refineries 1- Residual Risk and Technology Review Revisions, Revisions to 

incorporate Uniform Standards.

Subparts XX and YY – Ethylene - Residual Risk and Technology Review Revisions, Revisions to 

incorporate Uniform Standards.

Subpart Subpart UUU – Petroleum Petroleum Refineries Refineries 2 - Residual Residual Risk and Technology Review Revisions, Revisions to Risk and Technology Review Revisions, Revisions to 

incorporate Uniform Standards.

Subpart EEEE – Organic Liquid Distribution - Residual Risk and Technology Review Revisions, 

Revisions to incorporate Uniform Standards

Subpart DDDDD – Boilers and Process Heaters – Reconsideration

Part 65 – Consolidated Federal Air Rules

Subpart H - Uniform Standard General Provisions

Subpart I -Uniform Standard for Tanks

Subpart J - Uniform Standard for Equipment Leaks

Subpart K - Uniform Standard for Wastewater

Subpart L - Uniform Standard for Heat Exchangers

Subpart M - Uniform Standard for Closed Vent Systems and Control Devices

2
# C_2011226EN.01000902.xml

| 30.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 226/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 226/9

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeitsgericht Ludwigshafen am Rhein (Germany), lodged on 11 April 2011 — Georges Erny v Daimler AG — Werk Wörth

(Case C-172/11)

2011/C 226/16

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Arbeitsgericht Ludwigshafen am Rhein

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Georges Erny

Applicant:

Defendant: Daimler AG — Werk Wörth

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Does a provision concerning part-time working for older employees, contained in an individual contract, which stipulates that the agreed top-up amount is to be calculated in accordance with the German Order on Minimum Net Pay in the case also of frontier workers from France, such as Paragraph 5(1) of the contract of part-time working for older employees concluded between the parties, infringe Article 45 TFEU, as specifically implemented by Article 7(4) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 (1) of 15 October 1968? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does a provision concerning part-time working for older employees, contained in an individual contract, which stipulates that the agreed top-up amount is to be calculated in accordance with the German Order on Minimum Net Pay in the case also of frontier workers from France, such as Paragraph 5(1) of the contract of part-time working for older employees concluded between the parties, infringe Article 45 TFEU, as specifically implemented by Article 7(4) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 (1) of 15 October 1968?

1

| 2. | If the Court of Justice answers Question 1 in the affirmative:
  In the light of the provisions of Article 45 TFEU, as specifically implemented by Article 7(4) of Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68, are provisions of this kind in collective agreements, such as Point 8.3 of the general works council agreement of 24 July 2000 and Paragraph 7 of the collective agreement of 23 November 2004, to be interpreted as meaning that, in the case of frontier workers, the top-up amount is not to be calculated in accordance with the table set out in the Order on Minimum Net Pay? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the Court of Justice answers Question 1 in the affirmative:

In the light of the provisions of Article 45 TFEU, as specifically implemented by Article 7(4) of Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68, are provisions of this kind in collective agreements, such as Point 8.3 of the general works council agreement of 24 July 2000 and Paragraph 7 of the collective agreement of 23 November 2004, to be interpreted as meaning that, in the case of frontier workers, the top-up amount is not to be calculated in accordance with the table set out in the Order on Minimum Net Pay?

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 of 15 October 1968 on freedom of movement for workers within the Community (OJ, English special edition 1968(II), p. 475).

1

---
Editorial Note on Part 0
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 0 appear at 73 FR 73 FR 54947, Sept. 24, 2008.

§ 0.175 Judicial and administrative proceedings. ( a ) When the subject matter of a case or proceeding is within his or her respective jurisdiction, the Assistant Attorney General, Criminal Division, the Assistant Attorney General for National Security, or any Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Criminal Division or of the National Security Division is authorized to exercise the authority vested in the Attorney General by 18 U.S.C. 6003, to approve the application of a U.S. Attorney to a federal court for an order compelling testimony or the production of information by a witness in any proceeding before or ancillary to a court or grand jury of the United States, and the authority vested in the Attorney General by 18 U.S.C. 6004, to approve the issuance by an agency of the United States of an order compelling testimony or the production of information by a witness in a proceeding before the agency, when the subject matter of the case or proceeding is either within the cognizance of the Assistant Attorney General, Criminal Division, the Assistant Attorney General for National Security, or is not within the cognizance of the Divisions or Administration designated in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section.
( b ) The Assistant Attorneys General or any Deputy Assistant Attorney General of the Antitrust Division, the Civil Division, the Civil Rights Division, the Environment and Natural Resources Division and the Tax Division are authorized to exercise the power and authority vested in the Attorney General by 18 U.S.C. 6003 to approve the application of a U.S. Attorney to a Federal court for an order compelling testimony or the production of information in any proceeding before or ancillary to a court or grand jury of the United States when the subject matter of the case or proceeding is within the cognizance of their respective Divisions: *Provided, however,* That no approval shall be granted unless the Criminal Division indicates that it has no objection to the proposed grant of immunity.
( c ) The Assistant Attorneys General and Deputy Assistant Attorneys General designated in paragraph (b) of this section, and the Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration are authorized to exercise the authority vested in the Attorney General by 18 U.S.C. 6004 to approve the issuance by an agency of the United States of an order compelling testimony or the production of information by a witness in a proceeding before the agency when the subject matter of the proceeding is within the cognizance of their respective Divisions or the Administration: *Provided, however,* That no approval shall be granted unless the Criminal Division indicates that it has no objection to the proposed grant of immunity.
[Order No. 1310-88, 54 FR 297, Jan. 5, 1989, as amended by Order No. 2865-2007, 72 FR 10068, Mar. 7, 2007]