alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Article Search 

# Article search

## Article Listing Lookup

                        -            Press release         SBA Statement on Biden-Harris Administration Exceeding Small Disadvantaged Business Contracting GoalApril 12, 2024 
                        -            Press release         SBA Launches Digital Hub to Connect Small Businesses with Major Funding in President Biden’s Investing in America AgendaApril 11, 2024 
                        -            Press release         New Small Business Applications Soar to Over 17 Million Under  Biden-Harris AdministrationApril 11, 2024 
                        -            Press release         SBA Recognizes 2024 Small Business Investment Companies of the YearApril 10, 2024 
                        -            Press release         ICYMI: SBA Administrator Guzman Highlights Memphis Small Business Ahead of Today’s Total Solar EclipseApril 8, 2024 
                        -            Press release         SBA Recognizes 2024 Government Contractors and 8(a) Graduate of the Year April 5, 2024 
                        -            Press release         SBA Administrator Visits Baltimore for Bridge Collapse AidApril 5, 2024 
                        -            Press release         SBA Recognizes 2024 Phoenix Award Winners of the Year for Outstanding Disaster Recovery EffortsApril 4, 2024 
                        -            Press release         THURSDAY: SBA Administrator to Visit Baltimore, Discuss Economic Assistance Available for Businesses Affected by Bridge Collapse  April 3, 2024 

#### Pagination

-                  Current page              1 
-                  Page              2 
-                  Page              3 
-                  Page              4 
-                  Page              5 
-                  Page              6 
-                  Page              7 
-                  Page              8 
-                  Page              9 
-  ... 
-  Next
§ 1311.6 What procedures apply to the selection of programs and activities under these regulations? ( a ) A state may select any program or activity published in the Federal Register in accordance with § 1311.3 of this part for intergovernmental review under these regulations. Each state, before selecting programs and activities, shall consult with local elected officials.
( b ) Each state that adopts a process shall notify TVA of the programs and activities selected for that process.
( c ) A state may notify TVA of changes in its selections at any time. For each change, the state shall submit to TVA an assurance that the state has consulted with local elected officials regarding the change. TVA may establish deadlines by which states are required to inform TVA of changes in their program selections.
( d ) TVA uses a state's process as soon as feasible, depending on individual programs and activities, after TVA is notified of the states selections.
## Breadcrumb

-  Inicio 
-  For Partners 

Parte o todo el contenido en esta página disponible solo en inglés.

# For Partners

Resources and guidance for SBA lenders, counselors and project officers.

## For Partners

-                Lenders                        Partner with the Small Business Administration to issue government-guaranteed loans.          -  7(a) loan program 
-  CDC/504 loan program 
-  Microloan program 
-  Become an SBA lender 
-  Lender reports 
-  Training on demand 
 
-                Counselors                        Materials for SBA partners, counselors, and project officers.          -  Small Business Development Centers 
-  Veterans Business Outreach Centers 
-  Women's Business Centers 
-  Community Navigator Pilot Program 
-  Instructional materials for trainers 
-  Nexus 
 
-                Small Business Investment Companies                        Get access to low-cost, government-backed capital to invest in small businesses.          -  Become an SBIC 
-  Invest in an SBIC 
-  Manage an SBIC 
-  Forms and guides 
-  Resource library 
 
-                Surety bond partners and agents                        Issue surety bonds secured by a guarantee from the Small Business Administration.          -  Operate as a surety bond partner or agent 
-  List of surety bond partners 
-  Become an SBA surety partner 
 
-                Contracting officials                        Work with the SBA to meet and exceed your agency's contracting goals.          -  Small business procurement 
-  Contracting program administration 
-  Contract administration
### subpart c—wetlands reserve program
Exhibit 10.9(a)


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO


AN AGREEMENT FOR A SUPPLY OF WATER


BY MIDDLESEX WATER COMPANY


TO THE BOROUGH OF HIGHLAND
PARK


DATED AS OF December 1, 2015


 


This Amendment (hereinafter referred to as the
“Amendment”) made this 1st day of December, 2015, between Middlesex Water Company, a public utility and corporation
organized under the laws of the State of New Jersey with offices at 1500 Ronson Road, Iselin, New Jersey (hereinafter referred
to as “Middlesex”), and the Borough of Highland Park, a municipal corporation of the State of New Jersey (hereinafter
referred to as “Highland Park”).


WHEREAS, the parties hereto had entered into
an Agreement for a Supply of Water by Middlesex to Highland Park, dated as of January 1, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as the “2006
Agreement”); and


WHEREAS, the 2006 Agreement, in Paragraph 7
thereof, provides for the minimum payment obligation by which “Highland Park shall be obligated to pay for the Daily Minimum
quantity of water” with “Daily Minimum” meaning “either: (a) one million two hundred thousand (1.2 mgd)
gallons of water a day, or (b) such greater amount as may be established under paragraph 8 of this Agreement”;


WHEREAS, the parties hereto recognize and acknowledge
that the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (“NJDEP”) has changed the methodology by which it calculates
firm capacity and the identification of Daily (Firm Capacity Transfer), Monthly and Yearly Allocation Amounts from Middlesex to
Highland Park; and


WHEREAS, as a result of the above-referenced
changes, the 2006 Agreement, Paragraph 7 must be modified to conform to the NJDEP’s allocation metric requirements



     


     


    




NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises
and of the mutual covenants herein contained, the parties agree that:


1.          Paragraph 7 of the 2006 Agreement is hereby
amended to read as follows: “Highland Park shall be obligated to pay for the Daily Minimum quantity of water. “Daily
Minimum” shall mean either (a) one million nine hundred and thirty thousand (1.93 mgd) gallons of water a day, or (b) such
greater amount as may be established under paragraph 8 of this Agreement.


2.          For the purposes of the NJDEP allocation
amounts to be calculated, the parties hereto agree that following allocation metrics shall apply:


	Daily (Firm Capacity 

Transfer)	Monthly	Yearly
	1.930 mgd	59.83 mgd	704.45 mgd


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused
this Amendment to be duly executed as of the day and year first written above:


 


	 	 	MIDDLESEX WATER COMPANY
	 	 	 	 
	ATTEST:	 	By:	/s/Dennis W. Doll
	 	 	 	Dennis W. Doll, President
	 	 	 	 
	/s/Jay L. Kooper	 	 	 
	Jay L. Kooper	 	 	 
	Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	BOROUGH OF HIGHLAND PARK
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	By:	/s/Gayle Brill-Mittler
	 	 	 	Gayle Brill-Mittler, Mayor
	ATTEST:	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	/s/Joan Hullings	 	 	 
	Joan Hullings, Borough Clerk
### §9076. Limitation on certain employee compensation

#### (a) In general

The Secretary may only provide financial assistance under this part to an air carrier or contractor after such carrier or contractor enters into an agreement with the Secretary which provides that, during the 2-year period beginning March 24, 2020, and ending March 24, 2022, no officer or employee of the air carrier or contractor whose total compensation exceeded $425,000 in calendar year 2019 (other than an employee whose compensation is determined through an existing collective bargaining agreement entered into prior to March 27, 2020)—

(1) will receive from the air carrier or contractor total compensation which exceeds, during any 12 consecutive months of such 2-year period, the total compensation received by the officer or employee from the air carrier or contractor in calendar year 2019;

(2) will receive from the air carrier or contractor severance pay or other benefits upon termination of employment with the air carrier or contractor which exceeds twice the maximum total compensation received by the officer or employee from the air carrier or contractor in calendar year 2019; and

(3) no officer or employee of the eligible business whose total compensation exceeded $3,000,000 in calendar year 2019 may receive during any 12 consecutive months of such period total compensation in excess of the sum of—

(A) $3,000,000; and

(B) 50 percent of the excess over $3,000,000 of the total compensation received by the officer or employee from the eligible business in calendar year 2019.

#### (b) Total compensation defined

In this section, the term "total compensation" includes salary, bonuses, awards of stock, and other financial benefits provided by an air carrier or contractor to an officer or employee of the air carrier or contractor.

(Pub. L. 116–136, div. A, title IV, §4116, Mar. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 500.)
Exhibit




Exhibit 10.25
    
EMPIRE RESORTS, INC. 

2015 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN


Award Agreement


This Award Agreement evidences an Award of Restricted Stock Units pursuant to the provisions of the Empire Resorts, Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) to the individual whose name appears below (the “Participant”), pursuant to the provisions of the Plan and on the following express terms and conditions (capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed thereto in the Plan):


1.    Name of Participant:     


		
	2.
	Number of Restricted Stock Units:       




3.    Date of Grant: 


		
	4.
	Risk of Forfeiture:




		
	5.
	Change of Control:  




		
	6.
	Settlement Terms:


 
The Participant hereby acknowledges receipt of a copy of the Plan as presently in effect.  The text and all of the terms and provisions of the Plan are incorporated herein by reference, and this grant of Restricted Stock is subject to these terms and provisions in all respects.  Upon lapse of the Risk of Forfeiture set forth above, the Participant shall remit to the Company an amount sufficient to satisfy the required withholding tax obligation of the Company that arises in connection with such lapse.




EMPIRE RESORTS, INC.                 




By:                                                                                   
      [NAME/TITLE]                Dated     




Agreed to and Accepted by:











 
[Name of Participant]                Dated







ELECTION TO INCLUDE IN GROSS INCOME
IN YEAR OF TRANSFER OF PROPERTY
PURSUANT TO SECTION 83(b) OF THE
INTERNAL REVENUE CODE OF 1986, AS AMENDED




The taxpayer hereby makes an election pursuant to Section 83(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, with respect to property described below and supplies the following information in accordance with the regulations promulgated thereunder.




		
	1.
	The name, address and taxpayer identification number of the taxpayer are:




_______________________________________


_______________________________________


_______________________________________ 



		
	2.
	Description of property with respect to which the election is being made: 
 
 



		
	3.
	The date on which the property described in 2. above, was transferred is             , 201_.  The taxable year to which this election relates is 201_. 



		
	4.
	Nature of restrictions to which property is subject: 
 
[described risk of forfeiture] 



		
	5.
	The fair market value at the time of transfer (determined without regard to any restrictions which by their terms will never lapse) of the property with respect to which this election is being made is          dollars ($    ) per share. 



		
	6.
	The taxpayer has [made no payment/paid is          dollars ($    ) per share] for said property. 
 



Dated:                                   
                                                            Taxpayer’s Signature
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR EN BANC RECONSIDERATION

Appellate case name: Ex Parte Oscar Minjare Sanchez, Jr.

Appellate case number: 01-18-00139-CR

Trial court case number: 1412036-A

Trial court: 176th District Court of Harris County

Date motion filed: April 29, 2020

Party filing motion: The State of Texas

A majority of the en banc court has voted to deny the State’s motion for en banc 

reconsideration. It is ordered that the motion is denied.

The en banc court consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Keyes, Lloyd, Kelly, 

Goodman, Landau, Hightower, Countiss, and Adams.

Justice Keyes, dissenting from the denial of en banc reconsideration. Justice Keyes would 

grant reconsideration of the en banc court’s March 31, 2020 opinion for the reasons set forth in 

the original December 20, 2018 panel opinion and in her opinion dissenting from en banc 

reconsideration. She would affirm the judgment of the trial court denying habeas relief. 

Judge’s signature: /s/ Sarah Beth Landau

Acting for the En Banc Court

Date: October 13, 2020
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Document Search 
-  Participating Export Lenders 

# Participating Export Lenders

## About this document and download

  Download  .xlsx
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 37225

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

PATRICK DAVID ELLINGER,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2010 Unpublished Opinion No. 657

Filed: October 5, 2010

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada

County. Hon. Darla S. Williamson, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of twenty years, with a minimum 

period of confinement of five years, for rape, affirmed.

Molly J. Huskey, State Appellate Public Defender; Sarah E. Tompkins, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

______________________________________________

Before LANSING, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Patrick David Ellinger pled guilty to rape. I.C. § 18-6101. In exchange for his guilty 

plea, an additional charge was dismissed. The district court sentenced Ellinger to a unified term 

of twenty years, with a minimum period of confinement of five years. Ellinger appeals.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court's discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 
2

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Ellinger’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Aurizon Mines Ltd. (the Company) is filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, its annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (the Report).

I, David P. Hall, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,to the best of my knowledge:

(i)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Aurizon Mines Ltd. and will be retained by Aurizon Mines Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

[ex12002.jpg]

______________________David P. Hall
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

May 20, 2003

---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Aurizon Mines Ltd. (the Company) is filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, its annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (the Report).

I, Ian S. Walton, Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(i)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Aurizon Mines Ltd. and will be retained by Aurizon Mines Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



[ex12004.jpg]

_____________________Ian S. Walton 
Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer

May 20, 2003
# C_2013129EN.01000202.xml

| 4.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/2

---

Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 February 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākās tiesas Senāts — Latvia) — SIA Forvards V v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests

(Case C-563/11) (1)

1

(Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure - Taxation - VAT - Sixth Directive - Right to deduct - Refusal - Invoice issued by a company considered fictitious)

2013/C 129/03

Language of the case: Latvian

Referring court

Referring court

Augstākās tiesas Senāts

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: SIA Forvards V

Applicant:

Defendant: Valsts ieņēmumu dienests

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Augstākās tiesas Senāts — Interpretation of Article 17(2)(a) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1) — Right to deduct input VAT — Taxable person fulfilling the requirements imposed by national law for deduction of the tax paid when goods are purchased, without any abusive conduct having been demonstrated — Refusal of the right to deduct VAT if it is established that the other party to the transaction is unable to supply the goods listed on the invoice which is formally in order

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

Article 17(2)(a) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, as amended by Council Directive 95/7/EC of 10 April 1995, must be interpreted as precluding the recipient of an invoice from being denied the right to deduct input value added tax on the ground that, in the light of the fraud or irregularities committed by the issuer of that invoice, the transaction corresponding to the invoice is considered not to have been actually carried out, unless it is established, on the basis of objective factors and without requiring of the recipient of the invoice checks which are not its responsibility, that the recipient knew or should have known that that transaction was connected with value added tax fraud, a matter which it is for the referring court to determine.

---

(1)  OJ C 13, 14.1.2012

1

---
#### § 1312.11 Appeals relating to permits.

Any affected person may appeal permit issuance, denial of permit issuance, suspension, revocation, and terms and conditions of a permit through existing administrative appeal procedures, or through procedures which may be established by the Federal land manager pursuant to section 10(b) of the Act and this part.
### Part D—National Center for Preservation Technology and Training
### SUBCHAPTER IV—MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
### §34. Definitions applicable to sections 34 to 36

For purposes of sections 34 to 36 of this title—

(1) the term "local government" means—

(A) a city, county, parish, town, township, village, or any other general function governmental unit established by State law, or

(B) a school district, sanitary district, or any other special function governmental unit established by State law in one or more States,

(2) the term "person" has the meaning given it in subsection (a) of the first section of the Clayton Act [15 U.S.C. 12(a)], but does not include any local government as defined in paragraph (1) of this section, and

(3) the term "State" has the meaning given it in section 4G(2) of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. 15g(2)).

(Pub. L. 98–544, §2, Oct. 24, 1984, 98 Stat. 2750.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 98–544, §6, Oct. 24, 1984, 98 Stat. 2751, provided that: "This Act [enacting this section, sections 35 and 36 of this title, and provisions set out as a note under section 1 of this title] shall take effect thirty days before the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 24, 1984]."
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  About SBA 
-  SBA Office Locations 
-  Loan and Guaranty Centers 
-  National Disaster Loan Resolution Center (Santa Ana, CA) 

# National Disaster Loan Resolution Center (Santa Ana, CA)

The center handles disaster loans in liquidation status.

              Login to E-Tran                            Send this file              

## Resources

                - Requirements for Disaster Loan Servicing Actions
                - Borrower’s Consent to Verify Information and 3rd Party Authorization
                - Administrative Wage Garnishments

## Contact Us

You can contact the center about your liquidation loan by calling 714-550-9566.

**National Disaster Loan Resolution Center**200 West Santa Ana BoulevardSanta Ana, CA 92701Phone: 714-550-9566

### Search documents, forms, and SOPs

Search

### Submit Your Forms

Submit loan guaranty packages through E-TRAN

### Submit Your Forms

Send This File
### **CHAPTER 76—NORTHWEST ATLANTIC FISHERIES CONVENTION**

Sec.
5601.
Representation of United States under Convention.
5602.
Requests for scientific advice.
5603.
Authorities of Secretary of State with respect to Convention.
5604.
Interagency cooperation.
5605.
Rulemaking.
5606.
Prohibited acts and enforcement.
5607.
Consultative committee.
5608.
Administrative matters.
5609.
Definitions.
5610.
Authorization of appropriations.
5611.
Repealed.
5612.
Repealed.