alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.4

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with GIANT GROUP, LTD.'s Annual Report of GIANT GROUP, LTD.
as filed with the SEC on the date hereof, I, Pasquale A. Ambrogio, Principal
Accounting officer of GIANT GROUP, LTD., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

          (1) This Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)), and

          (2) The information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents,
     in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
     of GIANT GROUP, LTD.

Dated: March 27, 2003

                                                     /s/ Pasquale A. Ambrogio
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                        Pasquale A. Ambrogio
                                                    Principal Accounting Officer
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ELTON L. LOWERY

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 2211

[ March 10, 2022 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; Robert E. Belanger

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2009CF004124A

.

Elton L. Lowery, Milton, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

D AMOORGIAN

, C IKLIN and G ERBER

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOUND IN THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> CANADIAN
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                 0.7333
<CASH>                                         197,766
<SECURITIES>                                    28,259
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,492
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     61,844
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               313,090
<PP&E>                                         538,574
<DEPRECIATION>                                  55,841
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 821,630
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           72,573
<BONDS>                                        239,680
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       378,813
<OTHER-SE>                                      72,553
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   821,630
<SALES>                                        255,168
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               255,168
<CGS>                                          181,869
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  217,078
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (453)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,105
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,600)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,985)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,985)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.04)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)<F1>
<FN>
<F1>USING US GAAP NET INCOME AND SFAS 128, BASIC AND DILUTED EPS ARE BOTH $(0.08).
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
§ 1312.4 Prohibited acts and criminal penalties. ( a ) Under section 6(a) of the Act, no person may excavate, remove, damage, or otherwise alter or deface, or attempt to excavate, remove, damage, or otherwise alter or deface any archaeological resource located on public lands or Indian lands unless such activity is pursuant to a permit issued under § 1312.8 or exempted by § 1312.5(b) of this part.
( b ) No person may sell, purchase, exchange, transport, or receive any archaeological resource, if such resource was excavated or removed in violation of: ( 1 ) The prohibitions contained in paragraph (a) of this section; or
( 2 ) Any provision, rule, regulation, ordinance, or permit in effect under any other provision of Federal law.
( c ) Under section (d) of the Act, any person who knowingly violates or counsels, procures, solicits, or employs any other person to violate any prohibition contained in section 6 (a), (b), or (c) of the Act will, upon conviction, be fined not more than $10,000.00 or imprisoned not more than one year, or both: provided, however, that if the commercial or archaeological value of the archaeological resources involved and the cost of restoration and repair of such resources exceeds the sum of $500.00, such person will be fined not more than $20,000.00 or imprisoned not more than two years, or both. In the case of a second or subsequent such violation upon conviction such person will be fined not more than $100,000.00, or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
[49 FR 1028, Jan. 6, 1984, as amended at 60 FR 5259, 5260, Jan. 26, 1995]
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 77 

To amend the Small Business Act to ensure small businesses affected by 

the onset of transmissible diseases are eligible for disaster relief. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 10, 2019 

Mr. RUBIO introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship 

A BILL 

To amend the Small Business Act to ensure small businesses 

affected by the onset of transmissible diseases are eligible 

for disaster relief. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business Relief 

5 From Disease Induced Economic Hardship Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3(k)(2) of the Small Busi8 ness Act (15 U.S.C. 632(k)(2)) is amended— 

9 (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

10 the end; 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 77 IS

1 (2) in subparagraph (C), striking the period 

2 and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

3 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(D) communicable diseases for which the Fed5 eral Government issues a travel alert or travel warn6 ing.’’. 

7 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendments made by sub8 section (a) shall apply to a communicable disease— 

9 (1) for which the Federal Government issues a 

10 travel alert or travel warning before, on, or after the 

11 date of enactment of this Act; and 

12 (2) the effects of which are experienced on or 

13 after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 824 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 824

      To increase the number of States that may conduct Medicaid 
  demonstration programs to improve access to community mental health 
                               services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 14, 2019

   Ms. Stabenow (for herself, Mr. Blunt, Mr. Schumer, Ms. Ernst, Mr. 
 Wyden, Mr. Gardner, Mr. Whitehouse, Mr. Sullivan, Ms. Klobuchar, and 
  Mr. Tillis) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To increase the number of States that may conduct Medicaid 
  demonstration programs to improve access to community mental health 
                               services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Excellence in Mental Health and 
Addiction Treatment Expansion Act''.

SEC. 2. COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM.

    Section 223(d) of the Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014 (42 
U.S.C. 1396a note) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (3)--
                    (A) by striking ``Not more than'' and inserting 
                ``Subject to paragraph (8), not more than''; and
                    (B) by striking ``2-year'' and inserting ``4-
                year''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(8) Additional programs.--In addition to the 8 States 
        selected under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall, not later 
        than 1 year after the date of enactment of the Excellence in 
        Mental Health and Addiction Treatment Expansion Act, select 11 
        States (which shall not include any States selected under 
        paragraph (1)) to participate in 2-year demonstration programs 
        that meet the requirements of this subsection and represent a 
        diverse selection of geographic areas, including rural and 
        underserved areas.''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit      10.6**

**PROGENICS      PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.**

**INDEMNIFICATION      AGREEMENT**

----

**,      **

----

----

*nolo*
*contendere*

----

----

----

----

*nolo*
*contendere*

----

*de*
*novo*

----

----

----
/**
 * @file
 *
 */

(function ($, Drupal) {
    Drupal.behaviors.cbhsqlogout = {
        attach: function (context, settings) {
            $('.user-logged-in a').click(function () {
                var href = drupalSettings.path.baseUrl + 'user/logout';
                if ($(this).attr('href') === href) {
                    localStorage.removeItem('Drupal.toolbar.activeTabID');
                }
            });
        }
    };
})(jQuery, Drupal);
# C_2011282EN.01004902.xml

| 24.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/49

---

Order of the General Court of 12 July 2011 — SNCF v OHIM — Infotrafic (infotrafic)

(Case T-491/10) (1)

1

2011/C 282/91

Language of the case: French

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 13, 15.1.2011.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Caprock Canyon  Investments,
Inc.,  on Form 10- QSB for the  period  ending  June 30,  2005 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "REPORT"),  the
undersigned,  Andrey Luzgin,  Chief Executive  Officer and Principal  Accounting
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: December 10, 2005


/s/ Andrey Luzgin
Andrey Luzgin
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Editorial Note on Part 0
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 0 appear at 73 FR 73 FR 54947, Sept. 24, 2008.

§ 0.39a Functions. ( a ) The Counsel shall: ( 1 ) Receive, review, investigate and refer for appropriate action allegations of misconduct involving Department attorneys that relate to the exercise of their authority to investigate, litigate or provide legal advice, as well as allegations of misconduct by law enforcement personnel when such allegations are related to allegations of attorney misconduct within the jurisdiction of DOJ-OPR;
( 2 ) Receive, review, investigate and refer for appropriate action; ( i ) Any allegation of reprisal against an employee or applicant who discloses information pursuant to paragraph (a)(1) of this section; and
( ii ) Allegations of reprisal taken against any Federal Bureau of Investigation employee for disclosing information pursuant to 28 CFR 27.1;
( 3 ) Report to the responsible Department official the results of inquiries and investigations arising under paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this section, and, when appropriate, make recommendations for disciplinary and other corrective action;
( 4 ) Refer any allegation not arising under paragraphs (a)(1) or (2) of this section to the Inspector General or another appropriate Department official;
( 5 ) Notify any person who has made allegations pursuant to paragraphs (a)(1) or (2) of this section and any person who was the subject of such allegations of the completion and, as appropriate, the results of, any inquiry or investigation undertaken, where such notification is permitted by law and consistent with the law enforcement interests of the Department;
( 6 ) Engage in liaison with the bar disciplinary authorities of the states, territories, and the District of Columbia with respect to professional misconduct matters;
( 7 ) Submit an annual report to the Attorney General summarizing the work of the Office;
( 8 ) Submit recommendations to the Attorney General and the Deputy Attorney General on the need for changes in policies and procedures that become evident during the course of the Counsel's inquiries and investigations;
( 9 ) Review proposals from Department employees to refer to appropriate licensing authorities apparent professional misconduct by attorneys outside the Department, and make such referrals where warranted, except that referrals made pursuant to 8 CFR 1003.106(d) do not require the Counsel's review; and
( 10 ) Perform any other responsibilities assigned by the Attorney General or the Deputy Attorney General.
( b ) For the purpose of paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section, any disclosure by an employee or applicant to a supervisor, Professional Responsibility Officer, the Office of Professional Responsibility, the Office of the Inspector General, the Executive Office for United States Attorneys, or other appropriate individual or component shall constitute disclosure to the Attorney General or the Counsel.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 48 (Friday, March 11, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 13344]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5476]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Beaver Creek Landscape Management Project, Ashland Ranger 
District, Custer National Forest; Powder River County, MT

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of change of responsible official.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On April 2, 2010 the Forest Service announced its notice of 
intent (NOT) to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the 
Beaver Creek Landscape Management Project in the Federal Register (75 
FR 16728). The notice of availability (NOA) of the Draft Environmental 
Impact Statement for the Beaver Creek Landscape Management Project was 
published in the Federal Register on October 15, 2010 (75 FR 63470, EIS 
No. 20100405, Draft EIS, USFS, MT).

Responsible Official

    In the NOI the Forest Supervisor, Mary Erickson, was identified as 
the Responsible Official. Pursuant to Forest Service Manual (FSM) 
2404.13 the District Ranger has the authority to be the Responsible 
Official for this project. Therefore, this is notice that Ashland 
District Ranger, Walt Allen, is the Responsible Official for the Beaver 
Creek Landscape Management Project.

DATES: The Final Environmental Impact Statement is planned to be 
released in April 2011.

ADDRESSES: No comments are being sought at this time. However, Walt 
Allen can be contacted at the Ashland Ranger District, P.O. Box 168, 
Ashland, MT 59003 or by phone at 406-784-2344.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Waring, Project Coordinator, at 
(406) 657-6205 extension 210.

    Dated: March 4, 2011.
Chris Worth,
Deputy Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2011-5476 Filed 3-10-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
RE D 

Jeffrey M. Harper 

FAA Office of Regional Counsel 

1601 Lind Avenue Southwest 

Renton, Washington 98057 

HEARING DOCKET 

T (425) 227-2161 

F (425) 227-1007 

In the Matter of: 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

FAA Case No. 2011NM060063 

DMS No. FAA-2012-0873 

Sky West Airlines, Inc. 

Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

NOTICE OF APPEAL 

In accordance with 14 C.F.R. § 13.233(a), Complainant hereby submits Notice of his 

intent to appeal the Initial Decision of Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin, 

served July 16,2015. 

Respectfully submitted this 22nd day of July, 2015. 

Digitally signed by JEFFREY 

M HARPER 

DN: c~US, o~U.S. ,,; ,-" +' / 

L,/""1~/iiil";-f,· -"''.cul:u' ,,,. ~--'G-"o!'-v,er"'nment, ou=ANM, J;f"!Vl."Ratper "" ou~ANM, cn~JEFFREY M 

l''AA Attorney HARPER 

Date: 2015.07.2214:27:51 

-07'00' 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certifY that the foregoing Notice of Appeal has been served via facsimile, 

electronic mail and Certified Mail- Return Receipt Requested this date, to the following: 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (El1-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

F (202) 366-7536 

E Richard.goodwin@dot.gov 

Todd Emerson, Esq. 

Sky West Airlines, Inc. 

444 South River Road 

St. George, UT 84 790 

F (435) 634-3505 

E temerson@skywest.com 

I hereby certifY that the foregoing Notice of Appeal has been served via facsimile, and 

Certified Mail- Return Receipt Requested tbis date, to the following: 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2 WI 000 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

F (202) 267-1293 

Dated this 22nd day ofJuly, 2015. 

Notice of Appeal 

In the Matter of SkyWest Airlines, Inc. 

dan a.l.steph en son@fa ~~,'~!::~:~~:;;::;::;,~~:~':""''""0' 

a.gov """'""·"-'-'-'"'"'"""'~'· 

Dana Stephenson 

Office of Regional Counsel (ANM-7) 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Ave. SW 

Renton, W A 98057 

( 425) 227-2007 

FAA Case No. 2011NM060063, OMS No. FAA-2012-0873 

Page 2 of 2 

Jeffrey M. Harper, FAA Attorney 

T (425) 227-2161 

F (425) 227-1007
#### In the Matter of the Application of Daphne Hellman, Appellant-Respondent, for an Order Awarding Her the Custody of Alexander Bull, an Infant. Harry Bull, Respondent-Appellant.

First Department,

June 4, 1943.

*291
      *Frank Delaney*of counsel *(Bené A. Wormser*and *Louis C. Haggerty*with him on the brief; *Haggerty, Myles-and Wormser,*attorneys), for appellant-respondent.

*George W. Whiteside*of counsel *(Dwight B. Collin*with him on the brief; *Henry Adsit Bull,*attorney), for respondent-appellant.

Cohx, J.

We agree with the well-considered report of the learned referee and the confirmatory findings of the court to the effect that since the Nevada decree awarding custody of the infant to the father, there has been no variance in circumstances which would justify a change in the custody arrangement. Nevertheless, in view of the limitation contained in the decree *that1 ‘*the Husband shall afford to the Son every opportunity to benefit by association with his mother ” and taking into account the best interests of this two-year-old child, we think that the Special Term quite properly fixed definite and reasonable times and conditions for visitation by the mother.

The foreign judgment of absolute divorce which embodied the agreement between the parties regulating care and custody of the child does not prevent a New York court from considering evidence as to the welfare of its infant ward. The Nevada decree in no way diminished the prerogative of the New York Supreme Court as *parens patries. (People ex rel. Herzog*v. *Morgan,*287 N. Y. 317.) The chancellor, exercising *292his jurisdiction in that capacity, acts to do what is best for the interest of the child. *(Finlay*v. *Finlay,*240 N. Y. 429, 434.) Accordingly, the order should be affirmed, without costs.

Dore and Callahan, JJ., concur; Martin, P. J., and Townley, J., dissent, and vote to modify by confirming the report of the referee.

Order affirmed, without costs.