alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification of Principal Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350**

**(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**

 

I, David Unger, Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) of MFRI, Inc. (the “Registrant”), certify that, to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended January 31, 2008 of the Registrant (the “Report”):

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| /s/ David Unger |
|-----------------|

David Unger

Director and Chairman of the Board of Directors

and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

April 30, 2008

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to MFRI, Inc. and will be retained by MFRI, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### THE PEOPLE OF THE TERRITORY OF GUAM v. PHILIP W. CHURCHILL, Defendant

Criminal No. 87F-76

Superior Court of Guam

October 28, 1976

ABBATE, *Judge*

DECISION

In denying Defendant’s 5 October, 1976, Motion to Dismiss for prosecution’s non-compliance with a discovery order, this Court cites its Decision in the companion case *People of the Territory of Guam v. Michael Imamura,*104F-76.

Submit order.
### SUBCHAPTER XXX—ARCHES NATIONAL PARK
### §9034. Funding for fraud prevention, equitable access, and timely payment to eligible workers

#### (a) In general

In addition to amounts otherwise available, there is appropriated to the Secretary of Labor for fiscal year 2021, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, $2,000,000,000, to remain available until expended, to detect and prevent fraud, promote equitable access, and ensure the timely payment of benefits with respect to unemployment compensation programs, including programs extended under subtitle A of title IX of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021.

#### (b) Use of funds

Amounts made available under subsection (a) may be used—

(1) for Federal administrative costs related to the purposes described in subsection (a);

(2) for systemwide infrastructure investment and development related to such purposes; and

(3) to make grants to States or territories administering unemployment compensation programs described in subsection (a) (including territories administering the Pandemic Unemployment Assistance program under section 9021 of this title) for such purposes, including the establishment of procedures or the building of infrastructure to verify or validate identity, implement Federal guidance regarding fraud detection and prevention, and accelerate claims processing or process claims backlogs due to the pandemic.

#### (c) Restrictions on grants to States and territories

As a condition of receiving a grant under subsection (b)(3), the Secretary may require that a State or territory receiving such a grant shall—

(1) use such program integrity tools as the Secretary may specify; and

(2) as directed by the Secretary, conduct user accessibility testing on any new system developed by the Secretary pursuant to subsection (b)(2).

(Pub. L. 116–136, div. A, title II, §2118, as added Pub. L. 117–2, title IX, §9032, Mar. 11, 2021, 135 Stat. 121.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Subtitle A of title IX of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, referred to in subsec. (a), is subtitle A (§§9011–9042) of title IX of Pub. L. 117–2, Mar. 11, 2021, 135 Stat. 118. For complete classification of subtitle A to the Code, see Tables.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 97-2150EM

NO. 98-1007EM

_____________

Charles R. Buchek, *

*

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Eastern

v. * District of Missouri.

*

Monsanto Company, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

_____________

 Submitted: August 7, 1998

Filed: August 14, 1998

_____________

Before FAGG, BEAM, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Charles R. Buchek appeals the district court's adverse grant of summary

judgment in Buchek's employment discrimination action and the district court's award

of costs to Monsanto Company. After careful review of the record and the parties'

briefs, we conclude the district court correctly granted judgment in favor of Monsanto

Company. We also conclude the district court's decision to award costs was not an

abuse of discretion. See Bathke v. Casey's Gen. Stores, Inc., 64 F.3d 340, 347 (8th

Cir. 1995) (standard of review). We deny the parties' motions on appeal. We thus

affirm the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
§ 115.363 Reporting to other confinement facilities. ( a ) Upon receiving an allegation that a resident was sexually abused while confined at another facility, the head of the facility that received the allegation shall notify the head of the facility or appropriate office of the agency where the alleged abuse occurred and shall also notify the appropriate investigative agency.
( b ) Such notification shall be provided as soon as possible, but no later than 72 hours after receiving the allegation.
( c ) The agency shall document that it has provided such notification.
( d ) The facility head or agency office that receives such notification shall ensure that the allegation is investigated in accordance with these standards.
§ 270.506 Confidentiality. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the Commission will accord confidential protection to, and not disclose to the public, any information submitted by a jurisdictional agency under § 270.204, if: ( 1 ) The jurisdictional agency, on its own motion or on request of the applicant, afforded such information confidential treatment before the jurisdictional agency; and
( 2 ) The agency order or the applicant's request stated grounds for confidential treatment which fall within one of the exemptions described in paragraphs (1) through (9) of 5 U.S.C. 552(b).
( b ) Upon receipt of a request for disclosure of information treated as confidential under paragraph (a) of this section, the Commission will determine in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552 whether the information is exempt. 5 U.S.C. 552(b). If it determines the information is not exempt, the information will be made public. If it determines the information is exempt, the Commission will not make it public unless determines that its conduct of the proceeding to review the jurisdictional agency determination requires making such information available to the public or to particular parties, subject to conditions (including a protective order) as the Commission may prescribe. Before making any information public under this paragraph, the Commission will provide at least 5 days notice to the person who submitted the information.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

September 25, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00432

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.L.M., B.N.M.,

B.M.M., Z.L.A., K.L.A., CHILDREN,

From the County Court, Jim Wells County, Texas

Trial Cou rt No. 17

- 01

- 56823

- CV Honorable Michael Ventura Garcia, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellant’s Motion to Extend Time to File Appellant’s Brief is hereby GRANTED. Appellant ’ s Brief is due on or before October 4, 2018.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 25th day of September, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Cler k of Court
EXHIBIT
      23.2




CONSENT OF BEEMER, PRICHER, KUEHNHACKL &
      HEIDBRINK P.A.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
      CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT




We hereby consent to the incorporation by
      reference into the Form S-8 Registration
      Statement No.333-07449 regarding the Dividend Reinvestment Program
      and Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-64537 regarding the Stock Compensation
      Plan of Whitemark Homes, Inc. of our report dated February 11,
      2005
      which is included in the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Whitemark
      Homes, Inc. and Subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2004.






/s/
      Beemer, Pricher, Kuehnhackl & Heidbrink P.A.




Orlando,
      Florida Date:
      April 17, 2006
#### § 381.101 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to set forth the fees charged by the Commission for services and benefits provided by the Commission.
§ 701.302 Procedures for notification of existence of records pertaining to individuals. ( a ) The systems of records, as defined in the Privacy Act of 1974, maintained by the Council are listed annually in the Federal Register as required by that Act. Any individual may request the Council to inform him or her whether a particular record system named by the individual contains a record pertaining to him or her. The request may be made in person during business hours or in writing at the location and to the person specified in the notice describing that record system.
( b ) An individual who believes that the Council maintains records pertaining to him or her but who cannot determine which records system contains those records, may request assistance by mail or in person at the Division of Program Coordination and Management, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC 20037, during business hours (8:00 a. m. through 4:30 p. m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays).
( c ) The Council will attempt to respond to a request as to whether a record exists within 10 working days from the time it receives the request or to inform the requestor of the need for additional time or additional information within 10 working days. If a request is complied with within 10 working days, no separate acknowledgment will be made.
[40 FR 45676, Oct. 2, 1975, as amended at 41 FR 8343, Feb. 26, 1976]
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 11-2114

___________

Streambend Properties II, LLC; *

Streambend Properties VIII, LLC, *

*

Appellants, *

*

v. *

*

Ivy Tower Minneapolis, LLC; Jeffrey * Appeal from the United States

Laux; Gary Benson, * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

Appellees, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Burnet Realty, LLC, *

*

Defendant, *

*

Commonwealth Land Title Insurance *

Company; John Doe; Mary Rowe; *

XYZ Corp., *

*

Defendants. *

___________

Submitted: December 23, 2011

Filed: January 11, 2012

___________

Before LOKEN, BYE, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.
Streambend Properties II, LLC and Streambend Properties VIII, LLC appeal the

district court’s order dismissing their civil action for failure to state a claim. The court

concluded that plaintiffs failed to sufficiently plead the interstate-commerce element

of the claims brought under the Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act, 15 U.S.C.

§ 1701 et seq. After careful de novo review, see Owen v. Gen. Motors Corp., 533

F.3d 913, 918 (8th Cir. 2008), we find that paragraphs 46 and 47 of the complaint

sufficiently pleaded this element. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a); Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.

Ct. 1937, 1949-50 (2009); Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555-57 (2007). 

The complaint alleges that the defendants “made use . . . of the mails” and made false

representations “by . . . letters.” Given that Rule 8(a)(2) requires only “a short and

plain statement of the claim,” and that “[s]pecific facts are not necessary,” Erickson

v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 93 (2007) (per curiam), these statements were sufficient to

allege “use . . . of the mails” as required by 15 U.S.C. § 1703(a). Accordingly, we

reverse the dismissal of the Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act claims in Counts

1 and 2 of the complaint, and we remand to the district court for further proceedings.

______________________________

-2-
```
**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-62844) pertaining to the Restated Airport Systems International,
Inc. 1991 Stock Option Plan of Elecsys Corporation (formerly Airport Systems
International, Inc.) of our report dated June 18, 2004, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Elecsys Corporation as of April 30, 2004
and for the year then ended included in this Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the
year ended April 30, 2005.

                                       /s/ Ernst & Young, LLP

Kansas City, Missouri
July 26, 2005
```
### SUBCHAPTER XCI—HELLS CANYON NATIONAL RECREATION AREA
#### § 16.27 Procedure in the event a department decision concerning a demand is not made prior to the time a response to the demand is required.

If response to a demand is required before the instructions from the appropriate Department official are received, the responsible official or other Department attorney designated for the purpose shall appear and furnish the court or other authority with a copy of the regulations contained in this subpart and inform the court or other authority that the demand has been or is being, as the case may be, referred for the prompt consideration of the appropriate Department official and shall respectfully request the court or authority to stay the demand pending receipt of the requested instructions.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joseph Torres, Appellant.

[828 NYS2d 65]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Molea, J.), rendered August 17, 2004, convicting him of murder in the second degree, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the defendant’s conviction of murder in the second degree to manslaughter in the second degree and vacating the sentence imposed thereon; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, for sentencing on the conviction of manslaughter in the second degree.

Following a jury trial the defendant was convicted of depraved indifference murder (Penal Law § 125.25 [2]). We agree with the defendant’s contention on appeal that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish that he acted with the depravity and indifference to human life required for a conviction of depraved indifference murder *(see People v Suarez,*6 NY3d 202, 212-214 [2005] ). However, the evidence was legally sufficient to establish the lesser-included offense of manslaughter in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.15 [1]; *see People v Rodriguez,*33 AD3d 730 [2006] ; *People v McMillon,*31 AD3d 136, 142 [2006], *lv denied*7 NY3d 815 [2006]), a charge that the defendant had requested be submitted to the jury. Accordingly, we modify the judgment by reducing the conviction from murder in the second degree to manslaughter in the second degree *(see People v Atkinson,*7 NY3d 765 [2006]; *People v McMillon, supra)*and remit the matter to the Supreme Court for sentencing on that conviction *(see*
      *705CPL 470.20 [4]). The defendant’s remaining claims concerning the weight of the evidence are without merit *(see People v Wells,*18 AD3d 482, 483 [2005]; *People v Rose,*224 AD2d 643 [1996]).

Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, he was neither placed in custody without probable cause *(see People v Ellerbe,*265 AD2d 569, 570 [1999]), nor subjected to a ruse that was so fundamentally unfair as to deny him due process *(see People v Miller,*268 AD2d 600 [2000]). Moreover, the People did not impermissibly shift the burden of proof by eliciting testimony and making statements that it was difficult to recover forensic evidence from the crime scene *(see People v Justino,*26 AD3d 345 [2006]; *People v Graham,*265 AD2d 424, 425 [1999]). Finally, there is no merit to the defendant’s claim that the jurors misunderstood the court’s “total circumstantial charge” *(People v Sanchez,*61 NY2d 1022, 1023 [1984]), and that it erred in failing to issue a curative instruction because the jury is presumed to have followed the court’s instruction *(see People v Hardy,*22 AD3d 679, 680 [2005]). Schmidt, J.P., Santucci, Skelos and Covello, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 23.1








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-160495) and on Form S-8 (No. 333-162111, No. 333-153674, No. 333-139856, No. 333-42879, No. 333-137546, No. 333-130452, No. 333-116991, No. 333-39754, No. 333-83463, No. 333-81447, No. 333-26177) of Gerber Scientific, Inc. of our report dated June 29, 2011 relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.





/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Hartford, Connecticut


June 29, 2011
205 BH008

BH009

06

189009b

189009a

189003

189004

BH170

BH253

BH256

189009a

BH005

253

BH255

254

BH001

BH002

168b

BH169

BH004

BH205

BH1

69

213

BH291

BH171a

004

B

H

1

6

9

BH178

189003

BH252

292

189009b

BH181

001

1

68b

290

07

205a

BH003

BH010

001

011

168b

171b

08b

189000

BH012

Nichols Lane

Lower North Fork Road

Calvert Creek Rd

Seymour Lake Road

001 189003

175

189004

189003

BH001

177

B

Lower North Fork Road 

Pintler Creek

Area

Township 1 North

Township 1 South

Range 15 West

Range 14 West 1 6

31

Dillon

Field Office

Beaverhead/Deerlodge

National Forest

GravelPit

GravelPit

Gravel

Pit

Beaverhead/Deerlodge

National Forest

Dillon

Field Office

Chalk Bluff

M

Beaverhead/Deerlodge

National Forest

GraPit

Township 3 North

Township 2 North

Range 13 

West

Range 12 

West

1

6

36

31

Township 2 North

Township 1 North

Range 13 West 1 6

36

31

Range 14

West

Fishtrap

Recreation

Site

Sportsman Park

Campground

6

31

Range 13 

West

Range 12

West

36

31

36 31
### **CHAPTER 12G—PACIFIC NORTHWEST FEDERAL TRANSMISSION SYSTEM**

Sec.
838.
Congressional findings; authority and duties of Secretary of Energy relating to Federal Columbia River Power System unaffected.
838a.
Definitions.
838b.
Operation and maintenance of Federal transmission system; construction of improvements, betterments, additions and replacements; criteria.
838c.
Acquisition by condemnation of transmission facilities.
838d.
Transmission of non-Federal power.
838e.
Acquisition of property.
838f.
Marketing of Federal power; sales agent.
838g.
Schedules of rates and charges for sale of Federal power and transmission of non-Federal power; confirmation and approval; criteria for modification and establishment.
838h.
Uniform schedules of rates and charges for sale of Federal power and transmission of non-Federal power; allocation of cost recovery.
838i.
Bonneville Power Administration fund.
838j.
Investment of excess moneys; deposit of moneys.
838k.
Bonneville Power Administration bonds.
838l.
Bonneville Power Administration refinancing.
838m.
Power marketing administration transmission borrowing authority.
838n.
Columbia Basin power management.
claims relating to the deprivation of constitutional rights that occurred

prior to the entry of the guilty plea" (internal quotation marks omitted)).

Having considered Schneider's contentions and concluded that he is not entitled to relief, we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.

J.

Hardesty

cc: Hon. Nancy L. Porter, District Judge Elko County Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Elko County District Attorney Elko County Clerk

2
### SUBCHAPTER CXXXIX—ASHLEY KARST NATIONAL RECREATION AND GEOLOGIC AREA

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior subchapter CXXXIX, relating to Martin Luther King, Jr. National Historical Park and consisting of sections 460bbbb to 460bbbb–7 of this title, was editorially reclassified as subchapter LIX–UU (§410www et seq.) of this chapter.
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1778 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



# Document

Number: 

# 169 ) ll-E-20 Docket Number: 

# A-90-0 6

Printed 10/28/2008 9:50:59 AM Sheet 169 of 276P. 2 

# CONVERSATIO N n-E-z i 

# - W ] 

# *lnl?2 TYP E • VISI T Locatio n o fVisft/Conferenc-i : U **vsnrbriblf-*« b I M icLtrnun t •INCOMIN G {^f OUTGOIN G NAM E O F PERSON(S ) CONTACTE D O R I N CONTAC T WIT H VO U 

## /"A a vf - $~f a i v

\ Wvj ORGANIZATIO N (Office , aept. . bureeu . etc. ) 

# w t . pc o TELEPHONE Nt t (411)2? /

-.2/ r y SUBJECT ROUTIN G NAME/SYMBO L 

# JL _ZJ yH, ' ^ - ->A C 0 iMi i 

### \Jtt, flS.rtWrS K " « U i l--<v/ * SUMMAR Y t-c , y-rU l - r Mdy WT " ^W 2 - ^ " ^ ~Hv3 ^

jfalAu ^

o f i~q/" K> ^

-.-I T\

c v 1 WMV/U I /vafav x- : SAJ* 1 "t*- 3 i AJ^J ^ *. J T ^

v^kja-y > "faj- T 

## f <-v crT / 1 H ^ y \ - \ v i i ' s^O-j j ttuJ " + * ; "t'lTA fV\Q. 7 ito ? wlg^-*y \ Ccr?»y(3.f a cvv . - ^ 

# 4 ,., t n- , . B-*. ; J .s..J* i -i4u d +s V t«/ t Y'S- J c>t r 

# *.t

-3- \. < ^ 

## m-4 \ 

# I'l^i c o,J ^ i ^ <*^ a _£i£U i



# Li k < . sKc J. V l u * "- V\ \ V- ' 

## M'tlv , y \

c * C- o M

_/ I ^ 

## \ J i i c^ & ~hl*"f cWE l f^ a .V y-VA& . rut ^

i"th A )



## ^ ° '^U l k

•

- ^ V W j -" > mq. 1 -* - \_-\«A

## j > SL\JCW>/J 

## -j-ksL . u^. t ^ , ..ilifa . . "tuQj . >v>

- W-^ J 

## /u- A10 ^ WIA^UVC^ K

## ~tkv< - ye ^ ck-~t / VM : 

## ^-U»

y*A^—

- ^ 0 ^ >

. 'VV 1 V 

# liojf l

/ 

# g-t

v -f au.-J,£/ 7 

# AWfatow* - v . J C o T^.-^^k ^ | ^ ) 7 ft ACTIO N REQUIRE D sioiiAljkLR^ ' „ \3* ' M NAM E O F PERSO N DOCUMENTIN G CONVERSATIO N 

# ^.vvrk . SCL-A V "2 _ f' , ' ACTIO N TA K 

# V 

# T\sA$>' < ^ . > M SIGNATUR E TITLE 50271-10 1 U.SQP O 198 5 -461-273/:o:0 2 CONVERSATIO N RECOR D OPTMNU L POH M 27 1 (l : OEPARTMOt TO P DEP D
### **CHAPTER 12B—BONNEVILLE PROJECT**

Sec.
832.
Completion and maintenance of project; generation of electricity.
832a.
General administrative provisions.
832a–1.
Repealed.
832b.
Definitions.
832c.
Distribution of electricity; preference to public bodies and cooperatives.
832d.
Contracts for sale of electricity.
832e.
Rate schedules.
832f.
Elements in determining rates.
832g.
Purchase of supplies and services.
832h.
Miscellaneous administrative provisions.
832i.
Employment of personnel.
832j.
Deposit of receipts; authorization of appropriations.
832k.
Authority of Administrator.
832 l.
Separability.
832m.
Sale of excess Federal power; fish and wildlife conservation within Federal Columbia River Power System; residential exchange; personnel flexibility.
Exhibit 10.3


 



 



COMMITMENT TO PROVIDE FUNDS FOR OPERATIONS FOR LAZURITON NANO BIOTECHNOLOGY (U.S.A.), INC., A NEVADA CORPORATION






















FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt and sufficiency of which are acknowledged, the undersigned, Chih-Yuan Hsiao, as the President and a member of the board of directors of Lazuriton Nano Biotechnology (U.S.A.) Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), hereby undertakes for a period of two years from the date specified below to provide and advance to the Company the principal amount of Four Hundred Thousand United States Dollars (400,000.00), in such amounts and on such dates as the undersigned, as that President, Treasurer and director, shall determine to be in the best interest of the Company.







Any amounts so provided and advanced by the undersigned shall not accrue interest and shall be payable on demand; provided, however, such demand will not be made prior to the expiration of that one year period after the date specified below.