alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.14




    
SECOND AMENDMENT
TO THE
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


APRIL 5, 2015
WHEREAS, TESCO CORPORATION, a corporation organized under the laws of the province of Alberta, Canada (the “Company”) and Dean Ferris (“Executive”) entered into the Employment Agreement effective on August 3, 2010 as amended (the “Agreement”); and
WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company approved on December 11, 2014 an increase in Executive’s Base Annual Salary commencing March 1, 2015 to THREE HUNDRED TEN THOUSAND DOLLARS ($310,000) and
WHEREAS, Executive and the Company (the “Parties”) have now agreed that, as a result of certain changes in market conditions, effective April 5, 2015 Executive’s Base Annual Salary shall be TWO HUNDRED NINETY-FOUR THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($294,500), reflecting a 5% reduction from Executive’s Base Annual Salary as approved on December 11, 2014 (the “Reduction”); and
WHEREAS, the Company and Executive agree that this Reduction is immaterial under Section 5(a) of the Agreement, and that this Reduction shall not constitute a Good Reason under the Agreement; 
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, which the Parties acknowledge is good and valuable consideration, the Parties agree to the amendment of the Agreement as follows (this “Amendment”): 
The first sentence of Section 5(a) shall be replaced with the following:
“Executive shall receive a Base Annual Salary annually of TWO HUNDRED NINETY-FOUR THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED U.S. dollars and no cents ($294,500) U.S.) payable in bi-weekly pay periods, subject to deduction of statutorily required amounts, including but not limited to, withholding for federal, state and local income taxes, and amounts payable by employees of Employer for employee benefits.” 
Executive, by executing this Amendment, agrees that the Reduction and amendment of Section 5(a) of the Agreement as provided in this Amendment are immaterial under Section 5(a) of the Agreement and shall not constitute Good Reason under the Agreement, and Executive waives any claims or rights he may have as a result of the Reduction and the amendment of Section 5(a); provided, however,  that Employee reserves the right to consider whether further diminution to the Base Annual Salary during the calendar year 2015 along with  this Reduction may constitute Good Reason under the Agreement without limiting the other requirements in the Agreement for Executive to terminate his employment for Good Reason, including the notice provisions in Section 6(e).











IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment to the Agreement effective as of April 5, 2015.
EXECUTIVE
Dean Ferris


Signature:  /s/ Dean Ferris
    


Date:  03/30/2015




EMPLOYER:




Tesco Corporation






By:          /s/ Fernando R. Assing
                                Fernando R. Assing,
                                  President and Chief Executive Officer


Date:  03/30/2015
### **CHAPTER 15—PREDATORY SEA LAMPREYS IN THE GREAT LAKES**
|                                              |  |              
|--------------------------------------------- |  | -------------
|EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN                  |  | Exhibit 10.35
|                                              | 
|The following is a summary of key Plan terms: |  |              

Eligibility

All full-time or part-time employees who have completed at least six months of continuous service as of the first day of each calendar quarter are eligible. Employees must have worked at least twenty hours per week for more than six months
per year.

Employee must not own more than 5% of the voting stock of the Company.

Participation

An Employee Stock Purchase Plan Enrollment Form must be completed to participate. Completed
forms should be filed with the Companys Human Resource Manager.

Discontinuance may occur at any time; however, initial enrollments or re-enrollments
are only allowed quarterly on January 1, April 1, July 1 and October 1. Enrollment Forms must be received at least two weeks prior to the enrollment date in order to be processed.

Amounts collected from employees to purchase Company stock must be made via after-tax payroll deduction. The minimum deduction is $10 per pay or $20 per month, and the
maximum allowed is 10% of the employees compensation. Deductions should be for a fixed dollar amount rather than a percentage of compensation.

Purchase of Shares / Issuance of Certificates

Each pay period the designated amount will be deducted from the employees pay.
The deducted funds are held in a Company bank account until the close of business on each calendar quarter. On the last day of each calendar quarter, the total funds held in the account are used to purchase shares of Orthovita, Inc. Common
Stock at 95% of the market price on the last day of that calendar quarter as traded on NASDAQ. Please note that this reflects two changes from prior periods which are mandated by the new accounting rules. Previously the shares of Orthovita Common
Stock were able to be purchased at 85% of the market price as traded on NASDAQ at the lower of the market price at the beginning of the calendar quarter or the end of the calendar quarter. The Companys transfer agent will deliver to
one certificate representing all common shares purchased during the calendar year. The certificate will be held in Trust for all participants.

Each
participant will receive an annual statement, dated December 31, of Orthovita common shares held pursuant to the Plan. Quarterly statements will be available upon request.

Individual certificates will be issued to employees only upon their termination from the Company or upon written request after having held the shares for at least six months.

Please review the detailed Plan for further information or let me know if you have any questions. In addition, all employees will continue to be covered by the
SECs insider trading regulations.
### §1533. Repealed. Pub. L. 111–358, title IV, §407(c), Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 4004

Section, Pub. L. 100–418, title V, §5163(d), Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1451, established the Commerce, Science, and Technology Fellowship Program within the Department of Commerce.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 111–358, §407(c), which directed the repeal of section 5163(d) of the Omnibus Trade and Competition Act of 1988, was executed by repealing this section, which was section 5163(d) of the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988 (Pub. L. 100–418), to reflect the probable intent of Congress.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  About SBA 
-  SBA Office Locations 
-  Loan and Guaranty Centers 
-  Disaster Loan Servicing Center (Birmingham, AL) 

## Section navigation

-  SBA locations    -  Headquarters Offices 
  -  Disaster Offices 
  -  District Offices 
  -  Loan and Guaranty Centers      -  Commercial Loan Service Centers 
    -  National Guaranty Purchase Center (Herndon, VA) 
    -  Loan Guaranty Processing Center (Citrus Heights, CA and Hazard, KY) 
    -  Sacramento Loan Processing Center (Sacramento, CA) 
    -  Disaster Loan Servicing Center (El Paso, TX) 
    -  Disaster Loan Servicing Center (Birmingham, AL) 
    -  National Disaster Loan Resolution Center (Santa Ana, CA) 
-  Open government 
-  SBA Newsroom 
-  Work for SBA 
-  Organization 
-  Oversight and advocacy 
-  Information in other languages 

# Disaster Loan Servicing Center (Birmingham, AL)

        Login to E-TRAN                Upload through Box        

## Resources

                  - How To Make Payments
                  - Requirements for Disaster Loan Servicing Actions
                  - Borrower’s Consent to Verify Information and Third-Party Authorization

## Contact Us

**Disaster Loan Servicing Center**2 North 20th St., Suite 320Birmingham, AL 35203Phone: 800-736-6048Fax: 205-290-7765

See map: Google Maps

Contact us by email.

Hours of operation:8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. (CST), Monday through Friday

### Search documents, forms, and SOPs

Search

### Submit Your Forms

Submit loan guaranty packages through E-TRAN

### Submit Your Forms

Upload through Box
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Pamela J. Montpelier, hereby certify that:



(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Service Bancorp, Inc.;



(2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



(4) The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and we have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business
issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such
evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any
change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



(5) The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuers board of directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers
internal controls over financial reporting.



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/ PAMELA J. MONTPELIER
|Pamela J. Montpelier    
|Chief Executive Officer 
|May 14, 2004
### SUBCHAPTER III—MIGRATORY BIRD CONSERVATION
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                     154,215,174
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,512,072
<ALLOWANCES>                                   165,000
<INVENTORY>                                    824,899
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           161,489,658
<PP&E>                                       4,595,775
<DEPRECIATION>                                 649,376
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             210,874,820
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,718,989
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       513,788
<OTHER-SE>                                 200,284,068
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               210,874,820
<SALES>                                      3,495,497
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,495,497
<CGS>                                        4,359,593
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,359,593
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            28,565,304
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                90,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (26,918,361)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (26,918,361)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (26,918,361)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.65)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.65)


</TABLE>
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. CA RO LI N E M . BELI LES, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e llan t. N o. 11- 10355 D. C. No . 1 : 1 0 - c r - 0 0 0 3 8 - J VEM ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

for the D i stri ctof G uam F r a nc e s T y di ngc o- G a t e w ood, C hi e f Judge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d F e brua ry21, 2012 ** B efo re: F E RN A N D E Z , M cK E O W N , an dB Y B E E , C i rcu i tJu d g es. C a r ol i ne B e l i l e s appe a l s he rj ury - tr i a l c onvi c t i on f orthe f tof gove rnm e nt prop erty, i n v i ol at i on of 18 U . S . C . § 6 41 , for w hi ch she w as se nt ence d t o three y e a r s o f p r o b a t i o n . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 , a n dw e a f f i rm. 

# FI LED FEB 24 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 10355 2 B el i l es ’ s s ol e c on t ent i on on appeali s thather tri alatt orney r endered i ne f f e c t i ve a s s i s t a nc e of

c ouns e l byf

a i l i ng t o r e que s tal i m i t i ng i ns truc t i on r e ga r di ng e vi de nc e of

unc ha r ge d a c t s tha tw a s pr e s e nt e d a ttr i a l . A l though i neff ec t i ve as si st ance of coun se l cl ai m s are general l y notconsi dere d o n d i re ct appe a l , the r e c or d i n thi s c a s e i s s uf f i c i e nt l yde ve l ope d t o pe rm i tc ons i de r a t i on of th is c la im . Se e U

n ite d S ta tes v . A lfe ra h in , 4 3 3 F .3 d1 1 4 8 , 1 1 6 0 n .6 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 6 ) . B e lile s ’s c la im f

a ils f o rla c ko f

p r e ju d ic e b e c au s e th e r e is n o r e a s o n ab le p ro b ab il ity th at th e r ea d in g o f ali m it in g in stru ctio n w o u ldh av e a ff ec tedth e ju ry ’s v e r d ic t g iv e n th e s tr e n g th o f th e g o v e rn m e n t’s e v id e n c e a g a in s t B e lile s . See Str i c kland v . W

as hi ngton , 46 6 U . S . 66 8, 69 4-96 (198 4). AF F I RME D.
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Gilman Ciocia, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, Michael Ryan, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:             /s/ Michael Ryan





Name:        Michael Ryan


Chief Executive Officer


Date:          September 28, 2012
EXHIBIT 12
                               
          GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
 STATEMENTS OF COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED
                           CHARGES (Unaudited)
                 (Dollar amounts in millions)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                  For the year ended December 31
                                  --------------------------
                                          1996     1995    1994
                                         -----    -----  -----
<S>                                      <C>     <C>     <C>
Fixed charges:
 Total interest costs                    $ 470   $  434  $460
 One-third of rent expense                  23       21    17
                                         -----   ------  ------
Total fixed charges                        493      455    477
                                         -----    -----  ------

Add (deduct):
 Income before income taxes,
   extraordinary item and
   accounting change                       296    1,697     572
 Interest capitalized,                  
   net of amortization                     (12)     (18)     11
                                         ------  ------  ----
                                           -284   1,679     583
                                         ------  ------  -----
Earnings for fixed charges                $ 777  $2,134  $1,060
                                         ======  ====== ======
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges         1.58x   4.69x   2.22x
                                         ======  ======  ======

</TABLE>
§ 706.204 Financial interests. ( a ) An employee shall not: ( 1 ) Have a direct or indirect financial interest that conflicts substantially, or appears to conflict substantially, with his Government duties and responsibilities; or
( 2 ) Engage in, directly or indirectly, a financial transaction as a result of or primarily relying on, information obtained through his Government employment.
( b ) This section does not preclude an employee from having a financial interest or engaging in financial transactions to the same extent as a private citizen not employed by the Government so long as it is not prohibited by law, Executive Order 11222, as amended, 5 CFR part 735, or this part.
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cedar Grove Marketing, Inc.,
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  B.
Stephen Bailey,  Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my  knowledge  and
belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2011204EN.01001601.xml

| 9.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 204/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 204/16

---

Appeal brought on 27 April 2011 by Union of European Football Associations (UEFA) against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 17 February 2011 in Case T-55/08: Union of European Football Associations (UEFA) v European Commission

(Case C-201/11 P)

2011/C 204/30

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Union of European Football Associations (UEFA) (represented by: D. Anderson QC, D. Piccinin, Barrister, B. Keane, Solicitor, T. McQuail, Solicitor)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission, Kingdom of Belgium, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Other parties to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The appellant submits that the contested judgment should be set aside on the following grounds:

| (a) | The General Court erred in law in the application of the Directive 89/552 (1), both as regards the requirement of clarity and transparency and the characterisation of the EURO as an event of major importance for society. |
| --- | --- |

(a)

The General Court erred in law in the application of the Directive 89/552 (1), both as regards the requirement of clarity and transparency and the characterisation of the EURO as an event of major importance for society.

1

| (b) | The General Court erred in law in the application of the Treaty provisions concerning competition. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

The General Court erred in law in the application of the Treaty provisions concerning competition.

| (c) | The General Court erred in law in the application of the Treaty provisions concerning the freedom to provide services and proportionality. |
| --- | --- |

(c)

The General Court erred in law in the application of the Treaty provisions concerning the freedom to provide services and proportionality.

| (d) | The General Court erred in law in the application of UEFA's right to property. |
| --- | --- |

(d)

The General Court erred in law in the application of UEFA's right to property.

| (e) | The General Court erred in law by finding that the contested decision contained an adequate statement of reasons in respect of (i) the characterization of the EURO as an event of major importance for society, (ii) competition, (iii) freedom to provide services, and (iv) property rights. |
| --- | --- |

(e)

The General Court erred in law by finding that the contested decision contained an adequate statement of reasons in respect of (i) the characterization of the EURO as an event of major importance for society, (ii) competition, (iii) freedom to provide services, and (iv) property rights.

---

(1)  Council Directive 89/552/EEC of 3 October 1989 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by Law, Regulation or Administrative Action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities

1

OJ L 298 p. 23

---