alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §4102. Notice of intent

#### (a) Filing with Secretary

An owner of eligible low-income housing that intends to terminate the low-income affordability restrictions through prepayment or voluntary termination in accordance with section 4108 of this title, extend the low-income affordability restrictions of the housing in accordance with section 4109 of this title, or transfer the housing to a qualified purchaser in accordance with section 4110 of this title, shall file with the Secretary a notice indicating such intent in the form and manner as the Secretary shall prescribe.

#### (b) Filing with State or local government, tenants, and mortgagee

The owner, upon filing a notice of intent under this section, shall simultaneously file the notice of intent with the chief executive officer of the appropriate State or local government for the jurisdiction within which the housing is located and with the mortgagee, and shall inform the tenants of the housing of the filing.

#### (c) Ineligibility for filing

An owner shall not be eligible to file a notice of intent under this section if the mortgage covering the housing—

(1) falls into default on or after November 28, 1990; or

(2)(A) fell into default before, but is current as of, November 28, 1990; and

(B) the owner does not agree to recompense the appropriate Insurance Fund, in the amount the Secretary determines appropriate, for any losses sustained by the Fund as a result of any work-out or other arrangement agreed to by the Secretary and the owner with respect to the defaulted mortgage.

The Secretary shall carry out this subsection in a manner consistent with the provisions of section 1701z–11 of this title.

(Pub. L. 100–242, title II, §212, as added Pub. L. 101–625, title VI, §601(a), Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4249.)
TRANSITIONS CAN BE HARD.

Help your kids avoid the pressures of trying marijuana and other drugs 

by being a good source of information.

Though marijuana laws are changing in some states for adults, all forms of marijuana can be harmful 

for a child’s growing brain. Start talking with your kids early about the risks. For tips on how—and 

when—to begin the conversation, visit:

www.underagedrinking.samhsa.gov

SMA-18-5087PSTCRD
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000835663
<NAME> THE GLENMEDE FUND
<SERIES NUMBER> 11
[NAME] GLOBAL EQUITY PORTFOLIO
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         12 MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR END>                    31-Oct-99
<PERIOD-END>                         31-Oct-99
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                    25,801,768
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                   29,889,822
<RECEIVABLES>                               288,946
<ASSETS-OTHER>                            2,019,666
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           32,198,434
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                    118,604
<OTHER-ITEMS LIABILITIES>                 2,040,309
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                       2,158,913
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                 26,392,693
<SHARES-COMMON-CURRENT>                   2,627,088
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                     2,517,766
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                  (440,509)
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                        (608)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                          0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                  4,087,945
<NET-ASSETS>                             30,039,521
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                           632,716
<INTEREST-INCOME>                            36,927
<OTHER-INCOME>                                6,031
<EXPENSES-NET>                              263,460
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                     412,214
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                  1,379,497
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                 3,428,395
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                     5,220,106
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                   616,853
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                  1,221,117
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                             0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                           0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>                       0
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                         109,322
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                    4,728,872
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                    (116,688)
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                  (407,213)
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                           0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                        0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                       201,240
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                             263,460
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                     28,745,368
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                         10.05
<PER-SHARE-NII>                                0.18
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                        1.94
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                           0.25
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                      0.49
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                           0.00
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                            11.43
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                                0.93%



</TABLE>
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: ESP Resources, Inc. v. Madoff Energy Holdings

, LLC

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 4

- 00 374

- CV

Trial court case number: 20 1 3

- 51833

Trial court: 295 th District Court of Harris County

Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(2)(C), t he parties have

filed a joint motion

, representing that they have agreed to settle the matte r and r equesting

that the Court abate this appeal to facilitate settlement. We grant the motion.

Accordingly, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to permit proceedings in

the trial court to effectuate the parties’ agreement. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(2)(C). The

parties shall file a motion to reinstate and a motion to dismiss the appeal, or other

appropriate motion, no later than 30 days from the date of this order. If the parties’

settlement agreement is not finalized by that date, the parties shall file a report advising

the Court of the status of the settlement proceedings.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s

active docket.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jim Sharp

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: September 23, 2014
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.16

                       WRITTEN CONFIRMATION OF CONSENT TO
                 AMENDMENT OF OPTION AND CANCELLATION OF OPTION

I, Robert K. Burgess, hereby confirm in writing my earlier consent on July 15,
1997 to the amendment of the stock option granted to me in July 1996 to purchase
l,000,000 shares of Common Stock of Macromedia at $15.00 per share to reduce the
per share exercise price to $7.781, the fair market value of Macromedia's Common
Stock on July 15, 1997.

I understand and confirm my agreement that the repriced option will remain
subject to all of its original terms as set forth in the Nonqualified Stock
Option Agreement, except that the repriced option will not be exercisable until
May 5, 1998 unless my employment as President of Macromedia is terminated prior
to that date (i) because of my death or disability or (ii) at or following a
"Change in Control" (as defined in my Employment Agreement) which termination
triggers the acceleration of the exercisability and vesting of my option
pursuant to my Employment Agreement.

I further understand and confirm my agreement to the cancellation, as of July
15, 1997, of the option granted to me on May 6, 1997 to purchase 250,000 shares
of Macromedia's Common Stock.


                                          /s/ Robert K. Burgess
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Signature of Robert K. Burgess

                                                          ______________________
                                                                   (Date)
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 14-1212.1

________________________________________________________________________

FINANCE

Debt-for-Nature Swap

Agreement Between the

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

and INDONESIA

Amending the Agreement of

September 29, 2014

Signed at Jakarta December 12, 2014 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent

evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof

or authentication thereof.”
 INDONESIA

 Finance: Debt-for-Nature Swap

 Agreement amending the agreement of

 September 29, 2014.

 Signed at Jakarta December 12, 2014;

 Entered into force December 12, 2014.
AMENDMENT NO. I TO THE THIRD AGREEMENT BETWEEN 

THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA AND 

THE GOVER~MENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

REGARDING A DEBT-FOR-NATURE SWAP WITH RESPECT TO CEHTAJN 

DEBT OWED BY THE GOVI<:RNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA TO 

THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

The Government of the Republic oflndonesia and the Government of the United States of 

America (the "Parties''). 

Recognizing that the Parties recently signed the Third Agreement Between The Governmen

Of The Republic Of Indonesia And The Government Of The United States Of America 

Regarding A Debt-For-Nature Swap With Respect To Certain Debt Owed By The 

Government Of The Republic Of Indonesia To The Government Of The United States Of 

America on September 29, 2014 (the ''Debt Swap Agreement''), which entered into force o

September 29, 20 I 4, pursuant to section 9. I ofthe Debt Swap Agreement; 

Whereas section 8.1 of the Debt Swap Agreement allows its amendment with the written 

consent of both Parties; and · 

In light ofthe desire of the Parties to resolve in a timely manner certain conditions prcced~nt 

that are requirements to the Closing under the Second Amendment to the Forest Conservatio

Agreement among the Government of the Republic of Indonesia. Conservation International 

Foundation, and Yayasan Keanekagaraman Hayati Indonesia, dated as of September 29, 

2014; 

Have agreed to amend: 

(I) section 2.3 of the Debt Swap Agreement by deleting •·December 15, 20 14," and insertin

in its place ·'January 22,20 15.''; and 

(2) section 9.2(a) of the Debt S\vap Agreement by deleting "December 15, 20 14.'' and 

inserting in its place "January 22, 20 15.'' 

This amendment shall enter into force upon the date of the last signature hereto. 

DONE at Jakarta, this {Z day of Dec .. 2014. 

FOR THE GOVERNMENT OF THE 

UNITED STATI:S OF AMERICA:
### Part G—Funding Authorities
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Appellee, *v.*Ernest “Ned” Higgins, Roosevelt Graves, and Charles Moore, Appellants.

(No. 70-189;

Fifth District

November 10, 1971.

*880Paul Bradley, of Defender Project, of Mount Vernon, for appellants.

Richard E. Richman, State’s Attorney, of Jacksonville, (Howard L. Hood, Assistant State’s Attorney, of counsel,) for the People.

Mr. JUSTICE JONES

delivered the opinion of the court:

The three defendants were convicted in a jury trial of knowingly carrying “concealed in a motor vehicle a .38-calibre Colt snub-nosed revolver” in violation of Ill. Rev. Stat., ch. 38, par. 24 — 1(a)(4). The .38-calibre revolver introduced in evidence was found at the scene of the defendants’ arrest four or five feet away from the automobile. The search was made following defendants’ arrest and removal from the scene. There was no testimony from any witness that the weapon or any “object” was thrown or removed from the automobile. One of the three defendants was apparently getting out of the automobile when the officers arrived. The two other defendants were nearby outside the automobile. Previously that evening the three defendants had entered the apartment of Holly Goodman at which time one of them had a pistol which Miss Goodman said “looked to her like” the revolver found at the scene of the arrest. Two other witnesses had been occupants of the car earlier in the evening and testified that they never saw a gun in the car or with any of the defendants.

The question is raised as to whether the court properly ruled on the motion for a directed verdict at the end of the State’s case. This ruling becomes immaterial in that the trial court denied the motion for a directed verdict at the close of all of the evidence.

Defendants contend that the evidence was insufficient to support a conviction.

There was no evidence that the weapon involved was “concealed” in the car nor that it was even in the car. There was no evidence who, among the three claimed occupants of the car, did the act. Accordingly, it must be held that the relevant facts, together with the permissible inferences to be drawn therefrom, fail to prove defendants’ guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

This case is not so unusual in the facts or in the applicable law to require an extended statement of the principles applicable to this case. *881We adopt the relevant portions of *People v. Gant,*84 Ill.App.2d 208, 228 N.E.2d 582.

For the reasons indicated the judgment of the circuit court of Jackson County is reversed.

Judgment reversed.

EBERSPACHER, P. J., and CREBS, J., concur.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Granite Cliffs Incorporated,
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "REPORT"),  the  undersigned,
Ekaterina Luzgina,  Chief Executive Officer and Principal  Accounting Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: August 16, 2005

/s/ Ekaterina Luzgina
Ekaterina Luzgina
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §720b. Environmental reviews

#### (a) Compliance with NEPA

The issuance of a certificate of public convenience and necessity authorizing the construction and operation of any Alaska natural gas transportation project under section 720a of this title shall be treated as a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment within the meaning of section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)).

#### (b) Designation of lead agency

#### (1) In general

The Commission—

(A) shall be the lead agency for purposes of complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.); and

(B) shall be responsible for preparing the environmental impact statement required by section 102(2)(c) 1 of that Act [42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)] with respect to an Alaska natural gas transportation project under section 720a of this title.

#### (2) Consolidation of statements

In carrying out paragraph (1), the Commission shall prepare a single environmental impact statement, which shall consolidate the environmental reviews of all Federal agencies considering any aspect of the Alaska natural gas transportation project covered by the environmental impact statement.

#### (c) Other agencies

#### (1) In general

Each Federal agency considering an aspect of the construction and operation of an Alaska natural gas transportation project under section 720a of this title shall—

(A) cooperate with the Commission; and

(B) comply with deadlines established by the Commission in the preparation of the environmental impact statement under this section.

#### (2) Satisfaction of NEPA requirements

The environmental impact statement prepared under this section shall be adopted by each Federal agency described in paragraph (1) in satisfaction of the responsibilities of the Federal agency under section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)) with respect to the Alaska natural gas transportation project covered by the environmental impact statement.

#### (d) Expedited process

The Commission shall—

(1) not later than 1 year after the Commission determines that the application under section 720a of this title with respect to an Alaska natural gas transportation project is complete, issue a draft environmental impact statement under this section; and

(2) not later than 180 days after the date of issuance of the draft environmental impact statement, issue a final environmental impact statement, unless the Commission for good cause determines that additional time is needed.

(Pub. L. 108–324, div. C, §104, Oct. 13, 2004, 118 Stat. 1257.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, referred to in subsec. (b)(1)(A), is Pub. L. 91–190, Jan. 1, 1970, 83 Stat. 852, which is classified generally to chapter 55 (§4321 et seq.) of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 4321 of Title 42 and Tables.

1 So in original. Probably should be section "102(2)(C)".
Memorandum

U.5.Department of

Transportation

Office of the Secretary

of Transportation

Subject:

From:

Notice of Communication in case:

Docket DOT -OST -2010-0018

Susan L. Kurland!

Assistant Secretary vlation

and International fairs

Date:

FEB 05 2015

Reply to Reese Davidson

Attn. of: x68161

To: Chief, Dockets

In accordance with Department rules (14 CFR Part 300), I am reporting the

following communication.

On January 30, 2015, Congressman Robert Bishop of Utah called me and raised

the Department's ongoing proceeding to consider the allocation of a pair of slots

for service to Tokyo's Haneda Airport (Haneda). Congressman Bishop noted the

importance of Seattle-Haneda service for the northwest section of the country

and urged DOT to retain Delta's Seattle-Haneda frequency. I informed

Congressman Bishop that I could not discuss the substance of an ongoing case,

and that a summary of the communication would be placed in the docket.

Please place this memorandum in Docket DOT -OST -2010-0018.

cc: Congressman Robert Bishop
### §6907. Applications for assistance

An application for assistance under this chapter shall be submitted in such form and in accordance with such procedures as the Administrator shall establish.

(Pub. L. 103–325, title I, §178, as added Pub. L. 106–102, title VII, §725, Nov. 12, 1999, 113 Stat. 1474.)
# United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 18-1199

UNITED STATES, EX. REL.

CONCILIO DE SALUD INTEGRAL DE LOÍZA, INC. ("CSILO"),

Plaintiffs, Appellants,

v.

JC REMODELING, INC. AND JOSE GARCIA-SUAREZ,

Defendants, Appellants.

**ERRATA SHEET**

The opinion of this Court issued on June 15, 2020, is amended

as follows:

On Page 5, line 9: "summons" is replaced with "summonses"
ICRAS 1413 1845 - 0038 v 11

– Affected Public - Individuals 8 / 5 /2013

**Student Assistance General Provisions**
**– Subpart K** 
**– Cash Management**  This request is for a revision to the current information collection 1845 - 0038 that is expiring. This collection pertains to the recordkeeping requirements contained in the regulations related to the administration of the Subpart K - Cash Management section of the Student Assistance General Provisions. The regulatory language has not changed. These program regulations are designed to provide benefits to borrowers, and protect the taxpayers' interest. The information collection requirements in these regulations are necessary to provide students with required information about their eligibility to receive funding under the federal student financial aid programs and to prevent fraud and ab use of program funds b y allowing students to reduce or reject aid being offered as well as being made aware of when such funding can be expected to be available. 34 CFR 668.165

– Notices and authorizations

– requires that institution’s provide their feder al student aid recipients with information about how much aid the recipient can expect to receive, when the aid will be available, provide the recipients the option of decreasing or eliminating loan or TEACH Grant funding if desired, and receive affirmativ e confirmation from the recipient of the accepted aid. Additionally , the institution must allow for a recipient to elect to have the institution hold aid funds and allow for the recipient to change that authorization at any time in writing. Section Tot al Respondents 15, 15 0,000 Responses 15,150,000 Burden Hours 914,500 TOTAL S Respondents 15, 15 0,000 Responses 15,150,000 Burden Hours 914,500