57092 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 185 / Wednesday, September 24, 2014 / Notices 

trees and shrubs. There are no food/feed 

uses and, it is exempt from a tolerance 

requirement when used as a sticker 

agent in packaging of insect control 

products used on food crops. 

Polybutene is approved by the U.S. 

Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as 

an indirect food additive and is used as 

an ingredient in cosmetic products that 

are applied directly to the skin such as 

sun block or moisturizer, and that may 

be incidentally ingested, such as 

lipstick. EPA conducted a qualitative 

assessment for both human health and 

ecological risks. No risks of concern 

were identified in the human health risk 

assessment. The ecological risk 

assessment indicated that there was no 

reasonable expectation for any 

registered use of polybutene to cause 

direct or indirect adverse effects to 

threatened and endangered species. A 

‘‘no effect’’ determination was made for 

all federally listed species and 

designated critical habitat. Pursuant to 

FFDCA section 408(p)(4), EPA has 

exempted polybutene from the 

requirements of the EDSP in an 

Administrative Order (AO) entitled 

‘‘Exemption of Polybutene from the 

Requirements of the Endocrine 

Disruptor Screening Program’’ which is 

available in the registration review 

docket. 

Undecylenic acid (Registration 

Review Decision). EPA has completed a 

registration review decision for 

undecylenic acid (UDA). The 

registration review docket for UDA 

(EPA–HQ–OPP–2011–0910) opened in 

December 2011. EPA issued the 

proposed decision for UDA on June 4, 

2014 and took comment for 60 days. 

The Agency received one comment from 

the Center for Biological Diversity, 

which supported the proposed 

registration review decision. UDA is 

registered as an insecticide and miticide 

in pet shampoos and spray products in 

combination with dioctyl sodium 

sulfosuccinate (DSS). As a pesticidal 

active ingredient, there are no food uses 

and, thus, no tolerances are established. 

UDA is approved by the FDA as an 

active ingredient in over the counter 

anti-fungal products, and it is also used 

as a flavoring agent. EPA has conducted 

a qualitative assessment for both human 

health and ecological risks, including 

listed species for UDA. The human 

health risk assessment did not identify 

any risks of concern for UDA. The 

ecological risk assessment made a ‘‘no 

effect’’ determination for federally listed 

species and designated critical habitat. 

Pursuant to FFDCA section 408(p)(4), 

EPA has exempted UDA from the 

requirements of the EDSP in an AO 

entitled ‘‘Exemption of Dioctyl Sodium 

Sulfosuccinate (DSS) and Undecylenic 

Acid (UDA) from the Requirements of 

the Endocrine Disruptor Screening 

Program’’ which is available in the 

registration review docket. 

Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.57, a 

registration review decision is the 

Agency’s determination whether a 

pesticide meets, or does not meet, the 

standard for registration in FIFRA. EPA 

has considered Ancymidol, DEET, 

Denatonium Saccharide, Dioctyl 

Sodium Sulfosuccinate, Metofluthrin, 

Polybutene Resins, and Undecylenic 

Acid in light of the FIFRA standard for 

registration. The Ancymidol, DEET, 

Denatonium Saccharide, Dioctyl 

Sodium Sulfosuccinate, Metofluthrin, 

Polybutene Resins, and Undecylenic 

Acid Final or Interim Decision 

documents in the respective dockets 

describe the Agency’s rationale for 

issuing a registration review final or 

interim decision for these pesticides. 

Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.58(c), the 

registration review case docket for 

Ancymidol, DEET, Denatonium 

Saccharide, Dioctyl Sodium 

Sulfosuccinate, Metofluthrin, 

Polybutene Resins, and Undecylenic 

Acid will remain open until all actions 

required in the final decision have been 

completed. 

Background on the registration review 

program is provided at: http://

www.epa.gov/oppsrrd1/registration_

review. Links to earlier documents 

related to the registration review of this 

pesticide are provided at: http://

www2.epa.gov/pesticide-reevaluation/

individual-pesticides-registrationreview. 

B. What is the Agency’s authority for 

taking this action? 

Section 3(g) of FIFRA and 40 CFR part 

155, subpart C, provide authority for 

this action. 

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq. 

Dated: September 16, 2014. 

Richard P. Keigwin, Jr., 

Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division, 

Office of Pesticide Programs. 

[FR Doc. 2014–22740 Filed 9–23–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0565; FRL–9915–03] 

Registration Review; Pesticide 

Dockets Opened for Review and 

Comment 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: With this document, EPA is 

opening the public comment period for 

several registration reviews. Registration 

review is EPA’s periodic review of 

pesticide registrations to ensure that 

each pesticide continues to satisfy the 

statutory standard for registration, that 

is, the pesticide can perform its 

intended function without unreasonable 

adverse effects on human health or the 

environment. Registration review 

dockets contain information that will 

assist the public in understanding the 

types of information and issues that the 

Agency may consider during the course 

of registration reviews. Through this 

program, EPA is ensuring that each 

pesticide’s registration is based on 

current scientific and other knowledge, 

including its effects on human health 

and the environment. This document 

also announces registration review case 

closures for 3 H–1,2 Dithiol-3-one,4,5,- 

dichloro- (RHY–86) (case 5033) and 

tepraloxydim (case 7257). In addition, 

this document announces the Agency’s 

intent not to open registration review 

cases for mepanipyrim (case 7042) and 

vinclozolin (case 2740) because there 

are no longer any active registrations 

containing either of these chemicals. 

The two case closures and the Agency’s 

intent not to open two registration 

review cases being announced herein 

are not open for public comment. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before November 24, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments 

identified by the docket identification 

(ID) number for the specific pesticide of 

interest provided in the table in Unit 

III.A., by one of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Do not submit electronically any 

information you consider to be 

Confidential Business Information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. 

• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental 

Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/ 

DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. 

NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001. 

• Hand Delivery: To make special 

arrangements for hand delivery or 

delivery of boxed information, please 

follow the instructions at http://

www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html. 

Additional instructions on 

commenting or visiting the docket, 

along with more information about 

dockets generally, is available at http:// 

www.epa.gov/dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

For pesticide specific information 

contact: The Chemical Review Manager 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 185 / Wednesday, September 24, 2014 / Notices 57093 

for the pesticide of interest identified in 

the table in Unit III.A. 

For general information contact: 

Richard Dumas, Pesticide Re-Evaluation 

Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide 

Programs, Environmental Protection 

Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., 

Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone 

number: (703) 308–8015; fax number: 

(703) 308–8005; email address: 

dumas.richard@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. Does this action apply to me? 

This action is directed to the public 

in general, and may be of interest to a 

wide range of stakeholders including 

environmental, human health, 

farmworker, and agricultural advocates; 

the chemical industry; pesticide users; 

and members of the public interested in 

the sale, distribution, or use of 

pesticides. Since others also may be 

interested, the Agency has not 

attempted to describe all the specific 

entities that may be affected by this 

action. 

B. What should I consider as I prepare 

my comments for EPA? 

1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this 

information to EPA through 

regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark 

the part or all of the information that 

you claim to be CBI. For CBI 

information in a disk or CD–ROM that 

you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the 

disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then 

identify electronically within the disk or 

CD–ROM the specific information that 

is claimed as CBI. In addition to one 

complete version of the comment that 

includes information claimed as CBI, a 

copy of the comment that does not 

contain the information claimed as CBI 

must be submitted for inclusion in the 

public docket. Information so marked 

will not be disclosed except in 

accordance with procedures set forth in 

40 CFR part 2. 

2. Tips for preparing your comments. 

When submitting comments, remember 

to: 

i. Identify the document by docket ID 

number and other identifying 

information (subject heading, Federal 

Register date and page number). 

ii. Follow directions. The Agency may 

ask you to respond to specific questions 

or organize comments by referencing a 

Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 

or section number. 

iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; 

suggest alternatives and substitute 

language for your requested changes. 

iv. Describe any assumptions and 

provide any technical information and/ 

or data that you used. 

v. If you estimate potential costs or 

burdens, explain how you arrived at 

your estimate in sufficient detail to 

allow for it to be reproduced. 

vi. Provide specific examples to 

illustrate your concerns and suggest 

alternatives. 

vii. Explain your views as clearly as 

possible, avoiding the use of profanity 

or personal threats. 

viii. Make sure to submit your 

comments by the comment period 

deadline identified. 

3. Environmental justice. EPA seeks to 

achieve environmental justice, the fair 

treatment and meaningful involvement 

of any group, including minority and/or 

low income populations, in the 

development, implementation, and 

enforcement of environmental laws, 

regulations, and policies. To help 

address potential environmental justice 

issues, the Agency seeks information on 

any groups or segments of the 

population who, as a result of their 

location, cultural practices, or other 

factors, may have atypical or 

disproportionately high and adverse 

human health impacts or environmental 

effects from exposure to the pesticides 

discussed in this document, compared 

to the general population. 

II. Authority 

EPA is initiating its reviews of the 

pesticides identified in this document 

pursuant to section 3(g) of the Federal 

Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide 

Act (FIFRA) and the Procedural 

Regulations for Registration Review at 

40 CFR part 155, subpart C. Section 3(g) 

of FIFRA provides, among other things, 

that the registrations of pesticides are to 

be reviewed every 15 years. Under 

FIFRA, a pesticide product may be 

registered or remain registered only if it 

meets the statutory standard for 

registration given in FIFRA section 

3(c)(5). When used in accordance with 

widespread and commonly recognized 

practice, the pesticide product must 

perform its intended function without 

unreasonable adverse effects on the 

environment; that is, without any 

unreasonable risk to man or the 

environment, or a human dietary risk 

from residues that result from the use of 

a pesticide in or on food. 

III. Registration Reviews 

A. What action is the Agency taking? 

As directed by FIFRA section 3(g), 

EPA is reviewing the pesticide 

registrations identified in the table in 

this unit to assure that they continue to 

satisfy the FIFRA standard for 

registration—that is, they can still be 

used without unreasonable adverse 

effects on human health or the 

environment. A pesticide’s registration 

review begins when the Agency 

establishes a docket for the pesticide’s 

registration review case and opens the 

docket for public review and comment. 

At present, EPA is opening registration 

review dockets for the cases identified 

in the following table. 

TABLE 1—REGISTRATION REVIEW DOCKETS OPENING

Registration review case 

name and No. Docket ID No. 

Chemical review manager or 

regulatory action leader, telephone 

No., email Address 

2-(thiocyanomethylthio) 

benzothiazole (TCMTB 

(Case 2625).

EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0405 ............................................ Sandra O’Neill, (703) 347–0141, 

oneill.sandra@epa.gov. 

1,3-Propanediamine, N-(3- 

aminopropyl)-N-dodecyl- 

(PAD) (Case 5109).

EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0406 ............................................ Tina Pham, (703) 308–0125, pham.tina@epa.gov. 

3(2H)-Isothiazolone, 4,5- 

dichloro-2-octyl- (DCOIT) 

(Case 5023).

EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0403 ............................................ SanYvette Williams, (703) 305–7702, williams.sanyvette@epa.gov. 

Bacillus thuringiensis (Case 

0247).

EPA–HQ–OPP–2011–0705 ............................................ Jeannine Kausch, (703) 347–8920, 

kausch.jeannine@epa.gov. 

Cyhalofop-butyl (Case 7255) EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0115 ............................................ Jolene Trujillo, (703) 347–0103, trujillo.jolene@epa.gov. 

Diclofop-methyl (Case 2160) EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0577 ............................................ Marianne Mannix, (703) 347–0275, 

mannix.marianne@epa.gov. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
57094 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 185 / Wednesday, September 24, 2014 / Notices 

TABLE 1—REGISTRATION REVIEW DOCKETS OPENING—Continued 

Registration review case 

name and No. Docket ID No. 

Chemical review manager or 

regulatory action leader, telephone 

No., email Address 

Etoxazole (Case 7616) ........ EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0133 ............................................ Julia Stokes, (703) 347–8966, stokes.julia@epa.gov. 

Fenpropimorph (Case 5112) EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0404 ............................................ Donna Kamarei, (703) 347–0443, 

kamarei.donna@epa.gov. 

Fluroxypyr,1- 

methylheptylester (Case 

7248).

EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0570 ............................................ Benjamin Askin, (703) 347–0503, 

askin.benjamin@epa.gov. 

GABA & LGA (Case 6025) .. EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0109 ............................................ Menyon Adams, (703) 347–8496, 

adams.menyon@epa.gov. 

Imazapic (Case 7234) .......... EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0279 ............................................ Ricardo Jones, (703) 347–0493, 

jones.ricardo@epa.gov. 

Imazaquin (Case 7204) ....... EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0224 ............................................ Wilhelmena Livingston, (703) 308–8025, livingston.wilhelmena@epa.gov. 

Polyoxin D Zinc Salt (Case 

6076).

EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0108 ............................................ Manying Xue, (703) 305–6198, xue.manying@epa.gov. 

Noviflumuron (Case 7434) ... EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0566 ............................................ Dana Friedman, (703) 347–8827, friedman.dana@epa.gov. 

Streptomyces lydicus WYEC 

(Case 6088).

EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0608 ............................................ Kathleen Martin, (703) 308–2857, martin.kathleen@epa.gov. 

Tebufenpyrad (Case 7435) .. EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0218 ............................................ Susan Bartow, (703) 603–0065, 

bartow.susan@epa.gov. 

Triallate (Case 2695) ........... EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0573 ............................................ Katherine St. Clair, (703) 347–8778, 

stclair.katherine@epa.gov. 

Zinc pyrithione (Case 2480) EPA–HQ–OPP–2004–0147 ............................................ Sandra O’Neill, (703) 347–0141, 

oneill.sandra@epa.gov. 

This notice also announces two case 

closures and the Agency’s intent not to 

open a registration review case for two 

additional chemicals. The registration 

review case for 3 H–1,2 Dithiol-3- 

one,4,5-dichloro- (RYH–86) (case 5033) 

is being closed for non-payment of 

maintenance fees for the last two 

remaining registrations. The 

tepraloxydim (case 7257) registration 

review case is being closed because the 

last products were canceled in the 

Federal Register notice on August 6, 

2014 (79 FR 45798) (FRL–9914–09). The 

‘‘Notice of Registration Review Case 

Closure for Tepraloxydim’’ is available 

in the docket EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0246 

at http://www.regulations.gov. The 

Agency intends not to open registration 

review cases for vinclozolin (case 2740) 

and mepanipyrim (case 7042) because 

there are no longer any products 

registered containing these active 

ingredients. The cancellation order for 

the last vinclozolin registrations was 

issued in the Federal Register notice on 

August 13, 2014 (79 FR 47454) (FRL– 

9914–00). There are no longer any 

products registered containing 

mepanipyrim. The two cases closures 

and the Agency’s intent not to open two 

registration review cases being 

announced herein are not open for 

public comment. 

B. Docket Content 

1. Review dockets. The registration 

review dockets contain information that 

the Agency may consider in the course 

of the registration review. The Agency 

may include information from its files 

including, but not limited to, the 

following information: 

• An overview of the registration 

review case status. 

• A list of current product 

registrations and registrants. 

• Federal Register notices regarding 

any pending registration actions. 

• Federal Register notices regarding 

current or pending tolerances. 

• Risk assessments. 

• Bibliographies concerning current 

registrations. 

• Summaries of incident data. 

• Any other pertinent data or 

information. 

Each docket contains a document 

summarizing what the Agency currently 

knows about the pesticide case and a 

preliminary work plan for anticipated 

data and assessment needs. Additional 

documents provide more detailed 

information. During this public 

comment period, the Agency is asking 

that interested persons identify any 

additional information they believe the 

Agency should consider during the 

registration reviews of these pesticides. 

The Agency identifies in each docket 

the areas where public comment is 

specifically requested, though comment 

in any area is welcome. 

2. Other related information. More 

information on these cases, including 

the active ingredients for each case, may 

be located in the registration review 

schedule on the Agency’s Web site at 

http://www.epa.gov/oppsrrd1/

registration_review/schedule.htm. 

Information on the Agency’s registration 

review program and its implementing 

regulation may be seen at http://

www.epa.gov/oppsrrd1/registration_

review. 

3. Information submission 

requirements. Anyone may submit data 

or information in response to this 

document. To be considered during a 

pesticide’s registration review, the 

submitted data or information must 

meet the following requirements: 

• To ensure that EPA will consider 

data or information submitted, 

interested persons must submit the data 

or information during the comment 

period. The Agency may, at its 

discretion, consider data or information 

submitted at a later date. 

• The data or information submitted 

must be presented in a legible and 

useable form. For example, an English 

translation must accompany any 

material that is not in English and a 

written transcript must accompany any 

information submitted as an 

audiographic or videographic record. 

Written material may be submitted in 

paper or electronic form. 

• Submitters must clearly identify the 

source of any submitted data or 

information. 

• Submitters may request the Agency 

to reconsider data or information that 

the Agency rejected in a previous 

review. However, submitters must 

explain why they believe the Agency 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 185 / Wednesday, September 24, 2014 / Notices 57095 

should reconsider the data or 

information in the pesticide’s 

registration review. 

As provided in 40 CFR 155.58, the 

registration review docket for each 

pesticide case will remain publicly 

accessible through the duration of the 

registration review process; that is, until 

all actions required in the final decision 

on the registration review case have 

been completed. 

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq. 

Dated: September 18, 2014. 

Richard P. Keigwin, Jr., 

Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division, 

Office of Pesticide Programs. 

[FR Doc. 2014–22747 Filed 9–23–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

Information Collections Being 

Reviewed by the Federal 

Communications Commission Under 

Delegated Authority 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice and request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: As part of its continuing effort 

to reduce paperwork burdens, and as 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501– 

3520), the Federal Communications 

Commission (FCC or the Commission) 

invites the general public and other 

Federal agencies to take this 

opportunity to comment on the 

following information collection. 

Comments are requested concerning: 

whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

Commission, including whether the 

information shall have practical utility; 

the accuracy of the Commission’s 

burden estimate; ways to enhance the 

quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information collected; ways to minimize 

the burden of the collection of 

information on the respondents, 

including the use of automated 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology; and ways to 

further reduce the information 

collection burden on small business 

concerns with fewer than 25 employees. 

The FCC may not conduct or sponsor 

a collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid control 

number. No person shall be subject to 

any penalty for failing to comply with 

a collection of information subject to the 

PRA that does not display a valid Office 

of Management and Budget (OMB) 

control number. 

DATES: Written PRA comments should 

be submitted on or before November 24, 

2014. If you anticipate that you will be 

submitting comments, but find it 

difficult to do so within the period of 

time allowed by this notice, you should 

advise the contact listed below as soon 

as possible. 

ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to 

Cathy Williams, FCC, via email PRA@

fcc.gov and to Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

additional information about the 

information collection, contact Cathy 

Williams at (202) 418–2918. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

OMB Control Number: 3060–0208. 

Title: Section 73.1870, Chief 

Operators. 

Form Number: Not applicable. 

Type of Review: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Respondents: Business and other forprofit; Not-for-profit institutions. 

Number of Respondents and 

Responses: 18,498 respondents; 36,996 

responses. 

Estimated Time per Response: 0.166– 

26 hours. 

Frequency of Response: 

Recordkeeping requirement; Third party 

disclosure requirement. 

Total Annual Burden: 484,019 hours. 

Total Annual Costs: None. 

Obligation to Respond: Required to 

obtain or retain benefits. The statutory 

authority for this collection of 

information is contained in Sections 

154(i) of the Communications Act of 

1934, as amended. 

Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: 

There is no need for confidentiality with 

this collection of information. 

Privacy Impact Assessment(s): No 

impact(s). 

Needs and Uses: 47 CFR Section 

73.1870 requires that the licensee of an 

AM, FM, or TV broadcast station 

designate a chief operator of the station. 

Section 73.1870(b)(3) requires that this 

designation must be in writing and 

posted with the station license. Section 

73.1870(c)(3) requires that the chief 

operator, or personnel delegated and 

supervised by the chief operator, review 

the station records at least once each 

week to determine if required entries are 

being made correctly, and verify that the 

station has been operated in accordance 

with FCC rules and the station 

authorization. Upon completion of the 

review, the chief operator must date and 

sign the log, initiate corrective action 

which may be necessary and advise the 

station licensee of any condition which 

is repetitive. The posting of the 

designation of the chief operator is used 

by interested parties to readily identify 

the chief operator. The review of the 

station records is used by the chief 

operator, and FCC staff in 

investigations, to ensure that the station 

is operating in accordance with its 

station authorization and the FCC rules 

and regulations. 

OMB Control Number: 3060–0055. 

Title: Application for Cable Television 

Relay Service Station License, FCC 

Form 327. 

Form Number: FCC Form 327. 

Type of Review: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities; Not-for-profit 

institutions. 

Number of Respondents and 

Responses: 400 respondents; 400 

responses. 

Estimated Time per Response: 3.166 

hours. 

Frequency of Response: On occasion 

reporting requirement; Every 5 years 

reporting requirement. 

Total Annual Burden: 1,266 hours. 

Total Annual Costs: $98,000. 

Obligation To Respond: Required to 

obtain or retain benefits. The statutory 

authority for this collection of 

information is contained in Sections 

154(i), 308 and 309 of the 

Communications Act of 1934, as 

amended. 

Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: 

There is no need for confidentiality with 

this collection of information. 

Privacy Impact Assessment(s): No 

impact(s). 

Needs and Uses: This filing is the 

application for a Cable Television Relay 

Service (CARS) microwave radio 

license. Franchised cable systems and 

other eligible services use the 2, 7, 12 

and 18 GHz CARS bands for microwave 

relays pursuant to part 78 of the 

Commission’s Rules. CARS is 

principally a video transmission service 

used for intermediate links in a 

distribution network. CARS stations 

relay signals for and supply program 

material to cable television systems and 

other eligible entities using point-topoint and point-to-multipoint 

transmissions. These relay stations 

enable cable systems and other CARS 

licensees to transmit television 

broadcast and low power television and 

related audio signals, AM and FM 

broadcast stations, and cablecasting 

from one point (e.g., on one side of a 

river or mountain) to another point (e.g., 

the other side of the river or mountain) 

or many points (‘‘multipoint’’) via 

microwave. The filing is done for an 

initial license, for modification of an 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES