alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1318.200 Purpose and scope. ( a ) Categories of actions addressed in this section are those that do not normally have, either individually or cumulatively, a significant impact on the human environment and therefore do not require the preparation of an EA or an EIS.
( b ) The TVA entity proposing to initiate an action must determine, in consultation with the NEPA compliance staff, whether the proposed action is categorically excluded.
( c ) In order to find that a proposal can be categorically excluded, TVA will ensure that a larger project is not impermissibly broken down into small parts such that the use of a categorical exclusion for any such small part would irreversibly and irretrievably commit TVA to a particular plan of action for the larger project.
( d ) The actions listed in appendix A of this part are classes of actions that TVA has determined do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment (categorical exclusions), subject to review for extraordinary circumstances.
( e ) The use of a categorical exclusion for an action does not relieve TVA from compliance with other statutes or consultations, including, for example, the Endangered Species Act or the National Historic Preservation Act.
### §781. Comprehensive energy plan

#### (a) Report to President and Congress; analytical justification; scope of analysis

Pursuant and subject to the provisions and procedures set forth in this chapter, the Administrator shall, within six months from May 7, 1974, develop and report to the Congress and the President a comprehensive plan designed to alleviate the energy shortage, for the time period covered by this chapter. Such plan shall be accompanied by full analytical justification for the actions proposed therein. Such analysis shall include, but not be limited to—

(1) estimates of the energy savings of each action and of the program as a whole;

(2) estimates of any windfall losses and gains to be experienced by corporations, industries, and citizens grouped by socioeconomic class;

(3) estimates of the impact on supplies and consumption of energy forms consequent to such price changes as are or may be proposed; and

(4) a description of alternative actions which the Administrator has considered together with a rationale in explanation of the rejection of any such alternatives in preference to the measures actually proposed.

#### (b) Alterations; analytical justifications

The Administrator may, from time to time, modify or otherwise alter any such plan, except that, upon request of an appropriate committee of the Congress, the Administrator shall supply analytical justifications for any such alterations.

#### (c) Monitoring activity

The Administrator shall be responsible for monitoring any such plans as are implemented with respect to their effectiveness in achieving the anticipated benefits.

(Pub. L. 93–275, §22, May 7, 1974, 88 Stat. 113.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

Federal Energy Administration terminated and functions vested by law in Administrator thereof transferred to Secretary of Energy (unless otherwise specifically provided) by sections 7151(a) and 7293 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.
§ 410.1 Basin regulations—Water Code and Administrative Manual—Part III Water Quality Regulations. ( a ) The Water Code of the Delaware River Basin is a codification of regulations of the Delaware River Basin Commission applicable to public and private water projects and programs within the Delaware River Basin. Article I of the water code sets forth general policies of the Commission. Article II concerns the conservation, development and utilization of Delaware River Basin water resources, including during periods of drought. Article III sets forth water quality standards and guidelines for the Delaware River Basin. Article IV contains rules relating to application of water quality standards within the Basin. The Commission's Administrative Manual—Part III, Water Quality Regulations, applies to all public and private entities that discharge waste to waters of the Delaware River Basin.
( b ) Article III of the water code consists of Article III of the water quality regulations. Article IV of the water code consists of portions of Article IV of the water quality regulations.
( c ) Work, services, activities and facilities affecting the conservation, utilization, control, development or management of water resources within the Delaware River Basin are subject to regulations contained within the Delaware River Basin Water Code with Amendments through December 7, 2022 and the Administrative Manual—Part III Water Quality Regulations with Amendments through December 7, 2022. Both the Delaware River Basin Water Code and the Administrative Manual—Part III Water Quality Regulations are incorporated by reference into this section with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. You may obtain or inspect this material at the Delaware River Basin Commission (DRBC), 25 Cosey Road, West Trenton, New Jersey 08628-0360, 609-883-9500, *www.drbc.gov .* You may inspect this material at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, visit *www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html* or email *fr.inspection@nara.gov .*
[73 FR 55750, Sept. 26, 2008, as amended at 74 FR 60155, Nov. 20, 2009; 76 FR 16285, Mar. 23, 2011; 79 FR 26615, May 9, 2014; 88 FR 7006, Feb. 2, 2023]
### **CHAPTER 93—AGREEMENT ON PORT STATE MEASURES TO PREVENT, DETER AND ELIMINATE ILLEGAL, UNREPORTED AND UNREGULATED FISHING**

Sec.
7401.
Purpose.
7402.
Definitions.
7403.
Duties and authorities of the Secretary.
7404.
Authorization or denial of port entry.
7405.
Inspections.
7406.
Prohibited acts.
7407.
Enforcement.
7408.
International cooperation and assistance.
7409.
Relationship to other laws.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          66,554
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,610
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      5,547
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                94,201
<PP&E>                                          48,461
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,364
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 137,191
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,509
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           194
<OTHER-SE>                                      75,352
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   137,191
<SALES>                                        277,225
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               277,225
<CGS>                                          246,856
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  246,856
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 458
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 32,933
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,129
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             19,804
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,804
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.95
        


</TABLE>
§ 145.54 Terminology and classification; States. ( a ) *U.S. Pullorum-Typhoid Clean State.* ( 1 ) A State will be declared a U.S. Pullorum-Typhoid Clean State when it has been determined by the Service that: ( i ) The State is in compliance with the provisions contained in §§ 145.23(b)(3)(i) through (vii), 145.33(b)(3)(i) through (vii), 145.43(b)(3)(i) through (vi), 145.53(b)(3)(i) through (vii), 145.73(b)(2)(i), 145.83(b)(2)(i), 145.93(b)(3)(i) through (vii), and 145.103(b)(3)(i) through (ix).
( ii ) No pullorum disease or fowl typhoid is known to exist nor to have existed in hatchery supply flocks within the State during the preceding 12 months: *Provided,* That pullorum disease or fowl typhoid found within the preceding 24 months in waterfowl, exhibition poultry, and game bird breeding flocks will not prevent a State, which is otherwise eligible, from qualifying.
( 2 ) Discontinuation of any of the conditions described in paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section, or repeated outbreaks of pullorum or typhoid occur in hatchery supply flocks described in paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of this section, or if an infection spreads from the originating premises, the Service shall have grounds to revoke its determination that the State is entitled to this classification. Such action shall not be taken until a thorough investigation has been made by the Service and the Official State Agency has been given an opportunity for a hearing in accordance with rules of practice adopted by the Administrator.
[40 FR 1504, Jan. 8, 1975. Redesignated at 44 FR 61586, Oct. 26, 1979, and amended at 54 FR 23957, June 5, 1989; 67 FR 8469, Feb. 25, 2002; 76 FR 15794, Mar. 22, 2011; 85 FR 62567, Oct. 5, 2020]
#### Joel Claster, Appellant, *v.*Charles Laubheim et al., Respondents.

First Department,

June 4, 1943.

*266
      *Jay Leo Rothschild*of counsel *(Benjamin Siegel,*attorney), for appellant.

*Sanford E. Cohen*of counsel *(George Cohen*and *Sol F. Flich*with him on the brief; *Sanford E. Cohen,*attorney), for respondents.

*Per Curiam.*

The motion was for dismissal of-the complaint upon the ground that there is another action pending between the same parties and for the same cause and for a determination that the court decline jurisdiction over the subject matter of the action. The Special Term held that the pendency of the action previously instituted in the United States District Court for the Southern.District of New York did not preclude the plaintiff from maintaining this action. It granted the defendants ’ motion, however, to the extent of deciding that it would decline jurisdiction if it were determined that the defendants were not residents of the State of New York.

The plaintiff’s claims are founded on commercial transactions in which the defendant Charles Laubheim covenanted to pay sums of money to the plaintiff. The court is hot justified in declining jurisdiction by the fact that the plaintiff seeks to set aside transfers by Charles Laubheim to his wife in fraud of creditors which, if not avoided, would prevent the enforcement of these covenants.

The order, so far as appealed from, should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion to dismiss the complaint denied without condition, with leave to defendants to answer within ten days after service of a copy of order, on payment of said costs.

Martin, P. J., Townley, Untbrmyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ., concur.

Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion to dismiss the complaint denied without condition, with leave to the defendants to answer within ten days after service of order, on payment of said costs.
#### § 367.1310 Account 131, Cash.

This account must include the amount of current cash funds except working funds.
Searched for **http://www.volunteeringinamerica.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.volunteeringinamerica.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
<PAGE>

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kore Holdings, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10KSB for the three months ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Denis
C. Tseklenis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  February 24, 2005

/s/Denis C. Tseklenis
Denis C. Tseklenis
Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kore Holdings, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10KSB for the three months ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Denis
C. Tseklenis, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  February 24, 2005

/s/ Denis C. Tseklenis
Denis C. Tseklenis
Treasurer
Chief Financial Officer
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

March 24, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh 135655 & (13) Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 135655 COA: 281749 Kalamazoo CC: 06-002397-FH; DEMOND LAMAR MCDONALD, 07-000044-FH Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to app eal the December 7, 2007 orde r of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that th e questions presented
should be reviewed by this Court.

d0317 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 24, 2008

Clerk
#### § 1306.3 Surrender of possession.

Possession of real property will not be taken until the owner has been paid the agreed purchase price or TVA's estimate of just compensation has been deposited in court in a condemnation proceeding. To the greatest extent practicable, no person will be required to move from property acquired by TVA without at least 90 days' written notice thereof.

[38 FR 3592, Feb. 8, 1973. Redesignated at 52 FR 48019, Dec. 17, 1987]
### SUBCHAPTER LIX–X—SAGUARO NATIONAL PARK
§ 115.315 Limits to cross-gender viewing and searches. ( a ) The facility shall not conduct cross-gender strip searches or cross-gender visual body cavity searches (meaning a search of the anal or genital opening) except in exigent circumstances or when performed by medical practitioners.
( b ) The agency shall not conduct cross-gender pat-down searches except in exigent circumstances.
( c ) The facility shall document and justify all cross-gender strip searches, cross-gender visual body cavity searches, and cross-gender pat-down searches.
( d ) The facility shall implement policies and procedures that enable residents to shower, perform bodily functions, and change clothing without nonmedical staff of the opposite gender viewing their breasts, buttocks, or genitalia, except in exigent circumstances or when such viewing is incidental to routine cell checks. Such policies and procedures shall require staff of the opposite gender to announce their presence when entering a resident housing unit. In facilities (such as group homes) that do not contain discrete housing units, staff of the opposite gender shall be required to announce their presence when entering an area where residents are likely to be showering, performing bodily functions, or changing clothing.
( e ) The facility shall not search or physically examine a transgender or intersex resident for the sole purpose of determining the resident's genital status. If the resident's genital status is unknown, it may be determined during conversations with the resident, by reviewing medical records, or, if necessary, by learning that information as part of a broader medical examination conducted in private by a medical practitioner.
( f ) The agency shall train security staff in how to conduct cross-gender pat-down searches, and searches of transgender and intersex residents, in a professional and respectful manner, and in the least intrusive manner possible, consistent with security needs.
---

Exhibit 32.2



STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (the Form 10-K) of Middleburg Financial Corporation (the Company), I, Kathleen J. Chappell, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



(a)

the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(b)

the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company and its subsidiaries as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-K.





Date:  March 16, 2006

/s/ Kathleen J. Chappell

Kathleen J. Chappell

Senior Vice President

and Chief Financial Officer
evok-ex1018_451.htm



Exhibit 10.18

LEASE EXTENSION AND

MODIFICATION AGREEMENT

THIS LEASE EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION AGREEMENT ("Modification") is made and entered into this 21st day of August, 2015, by and between Beckman/Lomas, LLC ("Landlord"), a California limited liability company and Evoke Pharma, Inc., a Delaware Corporation ("Tenant") with reference to the following facts:

1.On or about November 15, 2013, Landlord and Tenant entered into that certain Standard Office Lease, dated (the “Lease”);

2.The Lease is for approximately 2,741 Rentable Square Feet known as Suite 270, 505 Lomas Santa Fe, Solana Beach, California 92075 (the “Premises”);

3.Tenant is currently in possession of the Premises and desires to continue its occupancy therein;

4.Landlord desires to continue Tenant's occupancy within the Premises;

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreement herein contained, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Landlord and Tenant agree to a modification of the Lease as follows:

1.Extension of Lease. Provided all the conditions herein are satisfied, the Lease is hereby extended from December 31, 2015 to December 31, 2016 (the "Extension Term") with respect to the Premises; during the Extension Term, the Base Year as set forth in Section 1.7 of the Lease shall be 2016.

2.Tenant Improvement.   Provided Tenant is not in default at any time hereunder, Landlord shall, at Landlord’s sole cost and expense, have the carpet and the windows in the Premises professionally cleaned within the first 30 days of the Extension Term.

3.Rent.  The Minimum Monthly Rent (exclusive of any other charges under the Lease) for the Extension Term shall be paid as follows: $9,456.45 per month. 

4. Brokers. Tenant warrants that it has had no dealing with any broker or agent except for T.D. Rolf of RE:Align in connection with the negotiation or execution of this Lease and Tenant agrees to indemnify and hold Landlord harmless from and against any other claims by any broker, agent or other person claiming a commission or other form of compensation by virtue of having dealt with Tenant with regard to the leasing transaction.

5.Full Force and Effect.  As used herein, all the defined terms shall be as defined as in the Lease and in the event of any conflict between the terms herein and the Lease, the terms set forth herein shall control. Except as contained herein, all other terms and conditions of the Lease are hereby ratified and affirmed, and remain in full force and effect, unmodified and unchanged.

 



Exhibit 10.18

The parties hereto signify their acceptance of this amendment by signing where applicable below.

Evoke Pharma, Inc.Beckman/Lomas, LLC

By:  /s/Matthew J. D’OnofrioBy:  /s/William R. Beckman

Title: EVP, Chief Business OfficerTitle:  Managing Member
1 Judge King did not participate in the decision. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED May 5, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk R E V I S E D 05/15/06

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-11432
POSITIVE SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS, INC. Plaintiff-Appellee v. NEW CENTURY MORTGAGE CORPORATION; NEW CENTURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION; eCONDUIT CORPORATION; THE ANYLOAN COMPANY; JEFF LEMIEUX; FRANK NESE Defendants-Appellants

- - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Texas

- - - - - ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion January 11, 2006, 5 Cir., 2006,

_____ F.3d

____ )
BEFORE: JONES, Chief Judge, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, SMITH,

WIENER, BARKSDALE, GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, DENNIS, CLEMENT, PRADO and OWEN, Circuit Judges. 1 BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by thecourt en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed.

The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
### SUBCHAPTER LIX–U—DAYTON AVIATION HERITAGE NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**


**SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002**






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of *Family
      Healthcare Solutions, Inc.* ,
      a
      Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on 10-QSB for the second quarter ended
      March
      31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
      I, Teodoro
      F. Franco L. ,
      certify, pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350),
      that to my knowledge:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
      April 18, 2006






/s/ Teodoro
      F. Franco L


Teodoro
      F. Franco L


Sole
      Officer/Director