alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 157.211 Delivery points. ( a ) *Construction and operation* — ( 1 ) *Automatic authorization.* The certificate holder may acquire, construct, replace, modify, or operate any delivery point, excluding the construction of certain delivery points subject to the prior notice provisions in paragraph (a)(2) of this section if: ( i ) The natural gas is being delivered to, or for the account of, a shipper for whom the certificate holder is, or will be, authorized to transport gas; and
( ii ) The certificate holder's tariff does not prohibit the addition of new delivery points.
( 2 ) *Prior notice.* Subject to the notice procedure in § 157.205, the certificate holder may acquire, construct, replace, modify, or operate any delivery point if: ( i ) The natural gas is being delivered to, or for the account of, an end-user that is currently being served by a local distribution company; and
( ii ) The natural gas is being delivered to a shipper for whom the certificate holder is, or will be, authorized to transport gas; and
( iii ) The certificate holder's tariff does not prohibit the addition of new delivery points.
( b ) *Contents of request.* In addition to the requirements of § 157.205(b), requests for activities authorized under paragraph (a)(2) must contain: ( 1 ) The name of the end-user, the location of the delivery point, and the distribution company currently serving the end-user;
( 2 ) A description of the facility and any appurtenant facilities;
( 3 ) A USGS 71 ⁄ 2-minute series (scale 1:24,000 or 1:25,000) topographic map (or map of equivalent or greater detail, as appropriate) showing the location of the proposed facilities;
( 4 ) The quantity of gas to be delivered through the proposed facility;
( 5 ) A description, with supporting data, of the impact of the service rendered through the proposed delivery tap upon the certificate holder's peak day and annual deliveries.
( c ) *Reporting requirements.* As part of the certificate holder's annual report of projects authorized under paragraph (a) of this section, the certificate holder must report in the manner prescribed in §§ 157.6(a) and 385.2011 of this chapter: ( 1 ) A description of the facilities acquired, constructed, replaced, modified or operated pursuant to this section;
( 2 ) The location and maximum quantities delivered at such delivery point;
( 3 ) The actual cost and the completion date of the delivery point; and
( 4 ) The date of each agreement obtained pursuant to § 157.206(b)(3) and the date construction began.
[Order 436, 50 FR 42491, Oct. 18, 1985, as amended by Order 493, 53 FR 15030, Apr. 27, 1988; Order 603, 64 FR 26608, May 14, 1999; Order 603-B, 65 FR 11464, Mar. 3, 2000]
§ 1318.300 Purpose and scope. ( a ) TVA shall prepare an EA for any proposed action not qualifying as a categorical exclusion to determine whether an EIS is necessary or a FONSI can be prepared. An EA need not be initiated (or completed) when TVA determines that it will prepare an EIS.
( b ) An EA shall concisely communicate information and analyses about issues that are potentially significant and reasonable alternatives.
###### Editorial Note on Part 284

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 284 appear at 65 FR 10222, Feb. 25, 2000.

#### § 284.125 [Reserved]
Exhibit 32.2
                                                                    ------------


     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned, Allen G. Sugerman, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of The
MIIX Group, Incorporated (the "Company"), has executed this certification in
connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003
(the "Report").

The undersigned hereby certifies that to the best of his knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
14th day of November, 2003.


                                           /s/ ALLEN G. SUGERMAN
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
                                           November 14, 2003
#### § 385.914 Commission action (Rule 914).

The Commission will upon consideration of the entire record, issue a final order affirming, modifying, or vacating the contested order or directing other appropriate relief. The Commission will serve the final order on the participants.

[Order 225, 47 FR 19022, May 3, 1982, as amended by Order 416, 50 FR 15733, Apr. 22, 1985]
### SUBCHAPTER III—RESEARCH PROGRAMS
```

[Senate Document 114-3]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

114th Congress, 1st Session - - - - - - - - - - Senate Document 114-3
_____________________________________________________________________
 
                           VETO--S.J. RES. 8

                                (PM 12)

                               __________

                                MESSAGE

                                  from

                     THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

                               returning

     WITHOUT MY APPROVAL S.J. RES. 8, PROVIDING FOR CONGRESSIONAL 
DISAPPROVAL UNDER CHAPTER 8 OF TITLE 5, UNITED STATES CODE, OF THE RULE 
      SUBMITTED BY THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD RELATING TO 
  REPRESENTATION CASE PROCEDURES, RECEIVED DURING ADJOURNMENT OF THE 
                        SENATE ON MARCH 31, 2015

[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]

                 April 13, 2015.--Ordered to be printed
To the Senate of the United States:
    S.J. Res. 8 would overturn the National Labor Relations 
Board's recently issued ``representation case procedures'' rule 
and block modest but overdue reforms to simplify and streamline 
private sector union elections. Accordingly, I am withholding 
my approval of this resolution. (The Pocket Veto Case, 279 U.S. 
655 (1929)).
    Workers need a strong voice in the workplace and the 
economy to protect and grow our Nation's middle class. Unions 
have played a vital role in giving workers that voice, allowing 
workers to organize together for higher wages, better working 
conditions, and the benefits and protections that most workers 
take for granted today. Workers deserve a level playing field 
that lets them freely choose to make their voices heard, and 
this requires fair and streamlined procedures for determining 
whether to have unions as their bargaining representative. 
Because this resolution seeks to undermine a streamlined 
democratic process that allows American workers to freely 
choose to make their voices heard, I cannot support it.
    To leave no doubt that the resolution is being vetoed, in 
addition to withholding my signature, I am returning S.J. Res. 
8 to the Secretary of the Senate, along with this Memorandum of 
Disapproval.

                                                      Barack Obama.
    The White House, March 31, 2015.

                                  [all]
```
#### § 1301.57 Waiver.

The General Counsel may grant a waiver of any procedure described by this part where a waiver is considered necessary to promote a significant interest of TVA or the United States, or for other good cause.
#### § 1301.43 Open meetings.

Members shall not jointly conduct or dispose of TVA business other than in accordance with this subpart. Except as provided in § 1301.46, every portion of every meeting of the agency shall be open to public observation, and TVA shall provide suitable facilities therefor, but participation in the deliberations at such meetings shall be limited to members and certain TVA personnel. The public may make reasonable use of electronic or other devices or cameras to record deliberations or actions at meetings so long as such use is not disruptive of the meetings.

[42 FR 21470, Apr. 27, 1977. Redesignated at 44 FR 30682, May 29, 1979]
Hands 

that look 

clean can still 

have icky 

germs!

Wash 

Your

Hands!

This material was developed by CDC. The Life is Better with Clean Hands campaign is made possible by a partnership between 

the CDC Foundation, GOJO, and Staples. HHS/CDC does not endorse commercial products, services, or companies.
# C_2010221EN.01005601.xml

| 14.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/56 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/56

---

Action brought on 18 June 2010 — Olive Line International v OHIM — O. International (O·LIVE)

(Case T-273/10)

()

2010/C 221/89

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Olive Line International, S.L. (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: P. Koch Moreno, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: O. International, S.r.l (Spoleto, Italy)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 14 April 2010 in case R 4/2009-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 14 April 2010 in case R 4/2009-4;

| — | Order the defendant to bear the costs of the proceedings; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to bear the costs of the proceedings; and

| — | Order the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs of the proceedings, should it become an intervening party in this case. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs of the proceedings, should it become an intervening party in this case.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘O·LIVE’, for goods and services in classes 3 and 44 — Community trade mark application No 5715008

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited: Community trade mark registration No 5086657 of the figurative mark ‘Olive Line’, for goods in classes 3, 29 and 30; Spanish trade mark registration No 2741533 of the figurative mark ‘Olive Line’, for goods in classes 3, 29 and 30; Spanish trade mark registration No 2525564 of the word mark ‘Olive Line’, for goods in class 3

Mark or sign cited:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal wrongly assessed that there was not a likelihood of confusion between the concerned trade marks.

Pleas in law:

---
§ 367.2230 Account 223, Advances from associate companies. ( a ) This account must include the face value of notes payable to associate companies and the amount of open book accounts representing advances from associate companies. It does not include notes and open accounts representing indebtedness subject to current settlement that are includible in account 233, Notes payable to associate companies (§ 367.2330), or account 234, Accounts payable to associate companies (§ 367.2340).
( b ) The records supporting the entries to this account must be kept so that the service company can furnish complete information concerning each note and open account.
### SUBCHAPTER CXXVIII—SLOAN CANYON NATIONAL CONSERVATION AREA
voucher information

Client ID:	**__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __**

Grant ID:  	**__ __ __ __ __ __ __**

Voucher ID:	**__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __**

Voucher Issue Date:	|___|___| / |___|___| / |___|___|___|___|

		Month	Day	Year

Voucher Amount:	$**__ __ __ __ __. __ __**

Voucher Service Type:	(Check all that apply)

**_______________________________________________________________**

SPARS CSAT GPRA ATR Voucher Information_v1.3.doc	1	Last update: 7/2011
Editorial Note on Part 0
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 0 appear at 73 FR 73 FR 54947, Sept. 24, 2008.

§ 0.103a Delegations respecting claims against the Drug Enforcement Administration. ( a ) The Administrator of DEA is authorized to exercise the power and authority vested in the Attorney General under the Act of December 7, 1989, Public Law 101-203, 103 Stat. 1805 (31 U.S.C. 3724) with regard to claims thereunder arising out of the lawful activities of DEA personnel in an amount not to exceed $50,000.00 in any one case.
( b ) Notwithstanding the provisions of 28 CFR 0.104, the Administrator of DEA is authorized to redelegate the power and authority vested in him in paragraph (a) of this section to the Chief Counsel of DEA and the Chief Counsel's designee within the Office of Chief Counsel. This authority shall not be further redelegated below the Associate Chief Counsel level.
[Order No. 1751-93, 58 FR 35371, July 1, 1993]
### SUBCHAPTER XLV—BRYCE CANYON NATIONAL PARK

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Utah National Park changed to Bryce Canyon National Park, see section 402a of this title.
### §713b. Repealed. July 31, 1945, ch. 341, §10, 59 Stat. 529

Section, acts Jan. 31, 1935, ch. 2, §9, 49 Stat. 4; Jan. 26, 1937, ch. 6, §2(a), 50 Stat. 5; Mar. 4, 1939, ch. 5, §1(b), (c), 53 Stat. 510; Mar. 2, 1940, ch. 34, 54 Stat. 38; Sept. 26, 1940, ch. 734, §3, 54 Stat. 962, related to the Export-Import Bank of Washington, its continuation of existence, and its powers. See chapter 6A (§635 et seq.) of Title 12, Banks and Banking.

Section was also repealed by act June 30, 1947, ch. 166, title II, §206(m), 61 Stat. 208.

Section 10 of act July 31, 1945, which repealed this section, was repealed by Pub. L. 102–429, title I, §121(c)(1), Oct. 21, 1992, 106 Stat. 2199.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Dissolution of Second Export-Import Bank of Washington, D.C.

Ex. Ord. No. 7365, May 7, 1936, 1 F.R. 372, dissolved said Bank on June 30, 1936, and provided that all remaining funds be covered into United States Treasury as miscellaneous receipts and all records transferred to Export-Import Bank of Washington.
#### Brooks *v.*The State.

Fish, C. J.

1. Upon the trial of the accused under a charge of murder, where it appeared that ill feeling had existed, for a long- time prior to the homicide, between him and the father of the deceased, it was no! error to admit testimony on behalf of the State to the effect, that the accused stated to the witness, some four months prior to the homicide, and two days before a term of the court was to begin, that if the father of the deceased “swore that he [the accused] was drunk, he [the accused] would prosecute.” the deceased for “opening- mail that did no! belong to him, and for seining before the law allowed it; and he could „ g-et more cases against him if he wanted to.” Such testimony was admissible as tending to show the state of feeling of the accused toward the deceased.

2. It was not cause for a new trial that the judge refused to order a mistrial, upon, motion of the accused, on the ground the solicitor-general, in his concluding argument to the jury, stated to them: “There arc murders all over the country going unpunished,; you do not have to look to the papers for them; the report of them is ringing over the telephone wires; you can count on your fingers a number of murders all over the *785country going unpunished,” -when the judge, in overruling- the motion for a mistrial, instructed the jury as follows: “You have nothing to do with any other case. You will not consider it. You will consider solely the question in this case.” Nor was it cause for a new trial that when the solicitor-general subsequently, in his argument to the jury, stated that “there were too many juries in this country undertaking to constitute themselves a pardoning board,” and counsel for the accused objected to such remark, the court merely directed the solicitor-general to “Stay within the evidence of this case, and don’t go outside,” and failed to caution the jury not to consider such statement of the counsel for the State.

July 13, 1910.

Indictment for 'murder. Before Judge Morris. Forsyth, superior court.

April 30, 1910.

*H. L. Patterson,*for plaintiff in error. *John G. Hart, attorney-general,*and *J. P. Brooke, solicitor-general,*contra.

3. The instructions given by the court as to the law of involuntary manslaughter in the commission of a lawful act without due caution and circumspection were sufficient, in the absence of a request for more specific instructions upon that subject, if indeed there was any evidence authorizing such instructions.

4. There was ample evidence to authorize the verdict, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

 

The Board of Directors 

Orthovita, Inc.:

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement(Nos. 333-66681, 333-90981, 333-100034, 333-107282, 333-118219) on Form S-8 and in the Registration Statement (Nos. 333-47386, 333-59288, 333-84632, 333-88334, 333-100341, 333-107210, 333-111697, 333-118216) on Form S-3 of Orthovita, Inc. of ourreports dated March 15, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Orthovita, Inc. as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss) andcash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 and the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting as of December 31, 2004, which reports appear in the December 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K of Orthovita, Inc. 

 

/s/    KPMG LLP 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

March 15, 2005
#### § 385.2004 Originals and copies of filings (Rule 2004).

The requirements for making filings under this chapter are posted on the Commission's Web site at *http://www.ferc.gov.* The requirements cover documents and forms submitted on paper, on electronic media, or via the Commission's electronic filing systems.

[Order 737, 75 FR 43405, July 26, 2010]
#### § 367.14 Transactions with associate companies.

Each service company must keep its accounts and records so as to be able to furnish accurately and expeditiously statements of all transactions with associate companies. The statements may be required to show the general nature of the transactions, the amounts involved in the transactions and the amounts included in each account prescribed in this part with respect to such transactions. Transactions with associate companies must be recorded in the appropriate accounts for transactions of the same nature. Nothing contained in this part, however, must be construed as restraining the service company from subdividing accounts for the purpose of recording separately transactions with associate companies.
# C_2011145EN.01001701.xml

| 14.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 145/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 145/17

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Santa Maria Capua Vetere (Italy) lodged on 7 March 2011 — Criminal proceedings against Yeboah Kwadwo

(Case C-120/11)

2011/C 145/23

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale di Santa Maria Capua Vetere

Party to the main proceedings

Party to the main proceedings

Yeboah Kwadwo

Question referred

Question referred

In the light of the principles of sincere cooperation, the effectiveness of directives and the proportionality and effectiveness of coercive measures for the return of illegally staying foreign nationals, do Articles 2, 15 and 16 of Directive 2008/115/EC (1) preclude an illegally staying foreign national who has simply failed to comply with the deportation order and the removal order issued by the administrative authorities from incurring criminal liability and being sentenced to a term of imprisonment of up to four years if he fails to comply with the first removal order and up to five years if he fails to comply with subsequent orders issued by the Questore?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2008 L 348, p. 98.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FOR THE YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          42,740
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,679
<ALLOWANCES>                                       500
<INVENTORY>                                     11,059
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                66,640
<PP&E>                                          47,913
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,743
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  92,316
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,485
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        26,964
<OTHER-SE>                                      56,326
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    92,316
<SALES>                                        120,383
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               120,383
<CGS>                                           98,610
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   98,610
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,418
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,101
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,582
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,519
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,519
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.20


</TABLE>