alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Delta Apparel, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date: February 10, 2006
    
    
    /s/ Robert W. HumphreysPresident and Chief Executive Officer
### §2305. Full and limited warranting of a consumer product

Nothing in this chapter shall prohibit the selling of a consumer product which has both full and limited warranties if such warranties are clearly and conspicuously differentiated.

(Pub. L. 93–637, title I, §105, Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2188.)
§ 385.2013 Notification of requests for Federal authorizations and requests for further information (Rule 2013). ( a ) For each Federal authorization—*i.e.*, permit, special use authorization, certification, concurrence, opinion, or other approval—required under Federal law with respect to a natural gas project for which an application has been filed under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act for a certificate of public convenience and necessity under section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, each Federal agency or officer, or State agency or officer acting pursuant to delegated Federal authority, responsible for a Federal authorization must file with the Commission within 30 days of the date of receipt of a request for a Federal authorization, notice of the following: ( 1 ) Whether the application is ready for processing, and if not, what additional information or materials will be necessary to assess the merits of the request;
( 2 ) The time the agency or official will allot the applicant to provide the necessary additional information or materials;
( 3 ) What, if any, studies will be necessary in order to evaluate the request;
( 4 ) The anticipated effective date of the agency's or official's decision; and
( 5 ) If applicable, the schedule set by Federal law for the agency or official to act.
( b ) A Federal agency or officer, or State agency or officer acting pursuant to delegated Federal authority, considering a request for a Federal authorization that submits a data request to an applicant must file a copy of the data request with the Commission within 10 business days.
[Order 687, 71 FR 62921, Oct. 27, 2006]
§ 385.714 Certified questions (Rule 714). ( a ) *General rule.* During any proceeding, a presiding officer may certify or, if the Commission so directs, will certify, to the Commission for consideration and disposition any question arising in the proceeding, including any question of law, policy, or procedure.
( b ) *Notice.* A presiding officer will notify the participants of the certification of any question to the Commission and of the date of any certification. Any such notification may be given orally during the hearing session or by order.
( c ) *Presiding officer's memorandum; views of the participants.* ( 1 ) A presiding officer should solicit, to the extent practicable, the oral or written views of the participants on any question certified under this section.
( 2 ) The presiding officer must prepare a memorandum which sets forth the relevant issues, discusses all the views of participants, and recommends a disposition of the issues.
( 3 ) The presiding officer must append to any question certified under this section the written views submitted by the participants, the transcript pages containing oral views, and the memorandum of the presiding officer.
( d ) *Return of certified question to presiding officer.* If the Commission does not act on any certified question within 30 days after receipt of the certification under paragraph (a) of this section, the question is deemed returned to the presiding officer for decision in accordance with the other provisions of this subpart.
( e ) *Certification not suspension.* Unless otherwise directed by the Commission or the presiding officer, certification under this section does not suspend the proceeding.
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

UNITED STATES

v.

Airman Basic TRAVIS L. MCBRYDE

United States Air Force

ACM 38828

18 February 2016

Sentence adjudged 17 March 2015 by GCM convened at Joint Base 

Andrews NAF Washington, Maryland. Military Judge: Joshua Kastenberg 

(sitting alone).

Approved Sentence: Dishonorable discharge and confinement for 102 

months.

Appellate Counsel for the Appellant: Major Isaac C. Kennen.

Appellate Counsel for the United States: Lieutenant Colonel Katherine E. 

Oler.

Before

ALLRED, MITCHELL, and MAYBERRY

Appellate Military Judges

This opinion is issued as an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as precedent 

under Rule of Practice and Procedure 18.4.

PER CURIAM:

The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no error 

materially prejudicial to the substantial rights of the appellant occurred. Article 66(c), 

UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c); United States v. Reed, 54 M.J. 37, 41 (C.A.A.F. 2000). 

 

 The court notes that the court-martial order (CMO), dated 5 Jun 2015, incorrectly states the date of sentencing as 

20 Mar 2015 instead of 17 Mar 2015. The court orders the promulgation of a corrected CMO.
2 ACM 38828

Accordingly, the approved findings and sentence are

AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT

LEAH M. CALAHAN

Clerk of the Court
### SUBCHAPTER LXXX—FLAMING GORGE NATIONAL RECREATION AREA
#### § 9.2 Contents of application.

Every application for approval of such transfer and acquisition by the proposed transferee shall set forth in appropriate detail the qualifications of the transferee to hold such license and to operate the property under license, which qualifications shall be the same as those required of applicants for license.

[Order 141, [12 FR 8491](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/12-FR-8491), Dec. 19, 1947]

Cross References:

For administrative rules relating to applicants for license, see [part 385 of this chapter](/on/2024-07-29/title-18/part-385). For regulations as to licenses and permits, see [part 4 of this chapter](/on/2024-07-29/title-18/part-4).
BEFORE THEY MAKE PLANS WITH 

FRIENDS...

Establish some family rules for social and extracurricular 

activities.

Young people don’t always have all the facts when it comes to alcohol and other 

drugs. Talk with your children about the risks of underage drinking and substance 

use, and be clear and consistent about your expectations. For tips on how—and 

when—to begin the conversation, visit 

www.underagedrinking.samhsa.gov

#TalkTheyHearYou PEP20-03-01-055
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Feather Valley  Financial,
Ltd., on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  December 31, 2001 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "REPORT"),  the
undersigned,  Raul Castro,  Chief  Executive  Officer and  Principal  Accounting
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ Raul Castro
Raul Castro
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Document Search 
-  Surety Bond Guarantee Program Web Icon Guidelines 

# Surety Bond Guarantee Program Web Icon Guidelines

## About this document and download

  Download  .pdf

**Owned by**

**Related Programs**    Related programs:
Searched for **http://www.flu.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.flu.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Feather Valley  Financial,
Ltd.,  on Form  10-QSB for the period  ending  March 31,  2002 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "REPORT"),  the
undersigned,  Raul Castro,  Chief  Executive  Officer and  Principal  Accounting
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ Raul Castro
Raul Castro
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2000, AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED OCTOBER 1, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                          36,441
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  105,431
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,896
<INVENTORY>                                    255,218
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               435,105
<PP&E>                                         441,604
<DEPRECIATION>                                 261,010
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 971,893
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          165,980
<BONDS>                                        774,872
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     98,286
<COMMON>                                           673
<OTHER-SE>                                   (131,067)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   961,910
<SALES>                                        552,606
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               552,606
<CGS>                                          375,211
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  375,211
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                29,986
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              54,678
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (66,531)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    51,454
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (118,215)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (118,215)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.91)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.91)


</TABLE>
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 883 

To provide for the unencumbering of title to non-Federal land owned by 

Win Oil Company, Inc., for purposes of economic development by removing the Federal reversionary interest in the land, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 26, 2019 

Ms. MCSALLY (for herself and Ms. SINEMA) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To provide for the unencumbering of title to non-Federal 

land owned by Win Oil Company, Inc., for purposes 

of economic development by removing the Federal reversionary interest in the land, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Flagstaff Federal Re5 version Relief Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 883 IS

1 SEC. 2. RELEASE OF FEDERAL REVERSIONARY INTEREST, 

2 FLAGSTAFF, ARIZONA. 

3 Any land (including the parcel of land located in the 

4 City of Flagstaff, Arizona, owned by Win Oil Company, 

5 Inc., and more particularly described in the deed recorded 

6 in Coconino County, Arizona, on November 11, 1998, as 

7 document number 98–44431) that is subject to a Federal 

8 reversionary interest pursuant to the Act of July 27, 1866 

9 (14 Stat. 292, chapter 278), shall no longer be subject 

10 to the Federal reversionary interest described in that Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
1 Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-40052

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

MOISES VILLARREAL-LARA,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. CA L-95-89; CR L-89-367

- - - - - - - - - -

July 24, 1996

Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

Moises Villarreal-Lara, Federal prisoner # 48011-079, appeals

the dismissal of his motion to vacate his sentence pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2255. Villareal-Lara claims that in light of the

administrative forfeiture of his tractor, a 1975 Freightliner, his

criminal conviction pursuant to a guilty plea constitutes an

impermissible second punishment for the same offense. 

This matter is controlled by the Supreme Court’s recent

decision in United States v. Ursery, __ S. Ct. __, 1996 WL 340815,
*8 (June 24, 1996), in which the Court held that “in rem civil

forfeiture is a remedial civil sanction, distinct from potentially

punitive in personam civil penalties such as fines, and does not

constitute a punishment under the Double Jeopardy Clause.” Even if

Ursery did not control, we would affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. United States v. Villarreal-Lara, No. CA L-95-89;

CR-L-89-367 (S.C.Tex. Nov. 30, 1995); see United States v. Morgan,

84 F.3d 765 (5th Cir. 1996). 

AFFIRMED.
# C_2011013EN.01002801.xml

| 15.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/28

---

Action brought on 15 October 2010 — SNCF v OHIM (infotrafic)

(Case T-491/10)

()

2011/C 13/54

Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Société nationale des chemins de fer français (SNCF) (Paris, France) (represented by: H. Reynaud, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Infotrafic SA (Ermont, France)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Alter paragraphs 16 to 23 of the decision of the Board of Appeal of OHIM of 6 August 2010 in Case R 1268/2009-2. |
| --- | --- |

—

Alter paragraphs 16 to 23 of the decision of the Board of Appeal of OHIM of 6 August 2010 in Case R 1268/2009-2.

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought:‘infotrafic’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 16, 38, 39 and 42 — Community trade mark No 1 926 815

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: Infotrafic SA

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity: The applicant

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Rejected the application for declaration of invalidity

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 52 and 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009, in so far as the examination of a complex Community trade mark in which one of the elements is devoid of distinctive character or has questionable distinctive character should consider each element separately: infringement of the obligation to state reasons.

Pleas in law:

---
|   | 1. | the Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Telefónica de Argentina S.A. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:    |  /s/ Eduardo Fernando Caride |                     |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------|--------------------------|
|   |   | Name:                             | Eduardo Fernando Caride  |   |
|   |   | Title:                            | Chairman                 |   |
|   |   |                              |                     |   |
|   |   |                              |                     |   |
|   |   |                              |                     |   |
|   | By:    | /s/ Sebastián Minoyetti      |                     |
|   |   | Name:                             | Sebastián Minoyetti |   |
|   |   | Title:                            | Chief Financial Officer  |   |
|   |   |                              |                     |   |

----