alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2004 of Financial Security Assurance
Holdings Ltd. (the "Company"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert P. Cochran, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  | By: | /s/ROBERT P. COCHRANChief Executive Officer
March 30, 2005
| |  | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

---
#### § 430.35 Amendments.

Upon request by any interested party, or on its own motion, the Commission may consider amendment of this regulation, and modify the geographic boundaries of the protected area, in accordance with Article 10 of the Compact.

[46 FR 24, Jan. 2, 1981. Redesignated at 51 FR 25031, July 10, 1986]
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 

CONSULTING AGREEMENT 

This Consulting Agreement (this “Agreement”) is made and entered into effective as of March 12, 2016 by and
between William J. Ruckelshaus (the “Executive”) and Blucora, Inc. (the “Company”). 

RECITALS 
 WHEREAS, the
Company and the Executive entered into an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement effective as of December 31, 2012, as further amended October 16, 2015 (together, the “Employment Agreement”); 

WHEREAS, the Executive’s employment with the Company pursuant to the Employment Agreement shall terminate effective March 31, 2016
(the “Termination Date”); 
 WHEREAS, the Company wishes to have the Executive available to provide transition
consulting services to the Company after the Termination Date; 
 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the mutual covenants
contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 

Consulting Services 
 For
a period of six calendar months following the Termination Date, (the “Consultancy Period”), Executive agrees to provide up to ten (10) hours per month of transition consulting services as reasonably requested by the
Company. In consideration for such services, the Company agrees to pay Executive a lump sum payment of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00) within Seven (7) days of the Termination Date and extend the exercise period referred to in
Section 6(d)(iii) of the Employment Agreement for an additional twelve months (subject to the terms and conditions of such section). Executive shall not be eligible for any other compensation or employment-related benefits during the
Consultancy Period except as explicitly provided in this Agreement and the Employment Agreement. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties
has executed this Agreement, in the case of the Company by its duly authorized officer, as of the day and year first above written. 
  

			
	COMPANY:
	
	BLUCORA, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Mark A. Finkelstein

	Name:	 	Mark A. Finkelstein
	Title:	 	Chief Legal and Administrative Officer
	
	EXECUTIVE:
	
	 /s/ William Ruckelshaus

William Ruckelshaus
# C_2011179EN.01001102.xml

| 18.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/11

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundeskommunikationssenat (Austria) lodged on 4 April 2011 — Publikumsrat des Österreichischen Rundfunks v Österreichischer Rundfunk

(Case C-162/11)

2011/C 179/20

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundeskommunikationssenat

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Publikumsrat des Österreichischen Rundfunks

Applicant:

Defendant: Österreichischer Rundfunk

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Are Articles 1(c), 10, 11 and 18(3) of Council Directive 89/552/EEC of 3 October 1989 (1) on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities, as amended by Directive 97/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 June 1997 amending Directive 89/552 (2) to be interpreted as meaning that announcements of any kind made by a television broadcaster in its programmes and broadcasts and relating to its own (free-to-air) programmes and broadcasts are covered by the term ‘television advertising’ (Article 1(c)), and are, inter alia, the provisions on separation between editorial content and advertising and the recognisable nature of advertising in Article 10 and on the insertion of advertising in Article 11 consequently also applicable to such announcements?

1

2

---

(1)  OJ 1989 L 298, p. 23.

1

(2)  OJ 1989 L 202, p. 60.

2

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                        976,000
<SECURITIES>                                        0         
<RECEIVABLES>                              21,850,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                  209,000
<INVENTORY>                                19,595,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           50,767,000 
<PP&E>                                     30,028,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              6,998,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             92,941,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      19,461,000
<BONDS>                                    35,275,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       50,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 35,991,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               92,941,000
<SALES>                                   111,240,000 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          111,240,000
<CGS>                                      83,305,000         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              83,305,000 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          1,640,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             4,584,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                1,826,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         2,758,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                2,758,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.54
        

</TABLE>
UAVSA Release 1.1

U.S. Department of Transportation

Page 1

Departing Location Protocols

A. PIC: Inform ATC of Completion of Flight Plan if Necessary

B. Final Measure Weather and Check and Mark Pilot’s and Operation’s Log.

Wind Direction

Wind Velocity

Relative Humidity

Barometric Pressure

Outside Temperature

Flight Duration

Flight Performance

C. Record Flight Notes, and UAS Performance (energy consumed).

D. Safety Debriefing of Flight and Operations Crews.

E. Breakdown UAS and Place in Travel Safety Case.

F. Crew: Carefully Pack Gear and other location Essentials.

1. Gear Checklist in Each Case

2. Make sure each Case has all equipment

3. Refer to each Case Packaging Slip (PDF located in each Case)

G. Case Checklist

1. Make sure all Cases brought to set are accounted for and Mark on Checklist.

H. After each Operations all Company Team are require to attend a Safety

Debriefing.

I. Team Meeting to Discuss Flight what was done correctly and what could have

been better executed.

J. Review All Communications and Discuss Improvements, Failures and Edits for

the Next Flight Operations.

K. Review Company Protocols and Discuss Edits, Changes and or Additions to the

Various Flight and Operations Protocols.

L. Discuss with the Team if the Base Camp Diagram and the Tent Location was laid

out properly and could it be improved for the Next Project.
### §7805. Protection of educational institution

#### (a) Notice required

Within 72 hours after entering into an agency contract or before the next athletic event in which the student athlete may participate, whichever occurs first, the athlete agent and the student athlete shall each inform the athletic director of the educational institution at which the student athlete is enrolled, or other individual responsible for athletic programs at such educational institution, that the student athlete has entered into an agency contract, and the athlete agent shall provide the athletic director with notice in writing of such a contract.

#### (b) Civil remedy

#### (1) In general

An educational institution has a right of action against an athlete agent for damages caused by a violation of this chapter.

#### (2) Damages

Damages of an educational institution may include and are limited to actual losses and expenses incurred because, as a result of the conduct of the athlete agent, the educational institution was injured by a violation of this chapter or was penalized, disqualified, or suspended from participation in athletics by a national association for the promotion and regulation of athletics, by an athletic conference, or by reasonable self-imposed disciplinary action taken to mitigate actions likely to be imposed by such an association or conference.

#### (3) Costs and attorneys fees

In an action taken under this section, the court may award to the prevailing party costs and reasonable attorneys fees.

#### (4) Effect on other rights, remedies and defenses

This section does not restrict the rights, remedies, or defenses of any person under law or equity.

(Pub. L. 108–304, §6, Sept. 24, 2004, 118 Stat. 1128.)
### §9099. Reports

#### (a) Report

Not later than May 1, 2021, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate a report on the financial assistance provided to passenger air carriers and contractors under this part, that includes—

(1) a description of any financial assistance provided to passenger air carriers under this part;

(2) any audits of passenger air carriers or contractors receiving financial assistance under this part;

(3) any reports filed by passenger air carriers or contractors receiving financial assistance under this part;

(4) any instances of non-compliance by passenger air carriers or contractors receiving financial assistance under this part with the requirements of this part or agreements entered into with the Secretary to receive such financial assistance; and

(5) information relating to any clawback of any financial assistance provided to passenger air carriers or contractors under this part.

#### (b) Internet updates

The Secretary shall update the website of the Department of the Treasury, at minimum, on a weekly basis as necessary to reflect new or revised distributions of financial assistance under this part with respect to each passenger air carrier or contractor that receives such assistance, the identification of any applicant that applied for financial assistance under this part, and the date of application for such assistance.

#### (c) Supplemental update

Not later than the last day of the 1-year period following December 27, 2020, the Secretary shall update and submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate, the report submitted under subsection (a).

#### (d) Protection of certain data

The Secretary may withhold information that would otherwise be required to be made available under this section only if the Secretary determines to withhold the information in accordance with section 552 of title 5.

(Pub. L. 116–260, div. N, title IV, §409, Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2059.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This part, referred to in subsecs. (a) and (b), was in the original "this subtitle", meaning subtitle A (§§401–412) of title IV of div. N of Pub. L. 116–260, Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2052, which enacted this part and amended sections 9041, 9071, and 9074 of this title. For complete classification of subtitle A to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Economic Aid to Hard-Hit Small Businesses, Nonprofits, and Venues Act, and also as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, and not as part of the CARES Act which in part comprises this chapter.
#### Lois Mary Di Paolo, Plaintiff, Counter Defendant-Appellee, *v.*Anthony Michael Di Paolo, Defendant, Counter Plaintiff-Appellant.

(No. 70-257;

Second District

September 14, 1971.

Vincent F. Lucchese and James F. Whitfield, of Chicago, for appellant.

Burek & Field, of Wheaton, for appellee.

Opinion by

Mr. JUSTICE SEIDENFELD.
Editorial Note on Part 0
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 0 appear at 73 FR 73 FR 54947, Sept. 24, 2008.

§ 0.168 Redelegation by Assistant Attorneys General. ( a ) Assistant Attorneys General are authorized, with respect to matters assigned to their respective divisions, to redelegate to subordinate division officials and United States Attorneys any of the authority delegated by §§ 0.160 (a), (b), and (c), 0.162, 0.164, and 0.172(b), except that any disagreement between a United States Attorney or other Department attorney and a client agency over a proposed settlement that cannot be resolved below the Assistant Attorney General level must be presented to the Assistant Attorney General for resolution.
( b ) Redelegations of authority under this section shall be in writing and shall be approved by the Deputy Attorney General or the Associate Attorney General, as appropriate, before taking effect.
( c ) Existing delegations and redelegations of authority to subordinate division officials and United States Attorneys to compromise or close civil claims shall continue in effect until modified or revoked by the respective Assistant Attorneys General.
( d ) Subject to the limitations set forth in § 0.160(d) and paragraph (a) of this section, redelegations by the Assistant Attorneys General to United States Attorneys may include the authority to: ( 1 ) Accept offers in compromise of claims asserted by the United States in all cases in which the gross amount of the original claim does not exceed $10,000,000; and
( 2 ) Accept offers in compromise of, or settle administratively, claims against the United States in all cases in which the principal amount of the proposed settlement does not exceed $1,000,000.
[Order No. 1958-95, 60 FR 15675, Mar. 27, 1995, as amended by AG Order No. 3532-2015, 80 FR 30618, May 29, 2015]
#### Samuel L. Matthews, Respondent, v. Alfred Hofmeister, Appellant.

Plaintiff does not ask for specific performance. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with costs, upon the authority of *Klim*v. *Sachs*(102 App. Div. 44) and *Krainin*v. *Coffey*(119 id. 516). Woodward, Jenks, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 48 (Friday, March 11, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13444-13445]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5596]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Aviation Proceedings, Agreements Filed the Week Ending February 
26, 2011

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under the Sections 412 and 414 of the Federal Aviation 
Act, as amended (49 U.S.C. 1382 and 1384) and procedures governing 
proceedings to enforce these provisions. Answers may be filed within 21 
days after the filing of the application.

    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2011-0037.
    Date Filed: February 25, 2011.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: Composite Passenger Tariff Coordinating Conference, 
Geneva, 22 October 2010, Composite Resolutions 012, 026, 047a, 076xx, 
076z, 087aa, Intended Effective Date: 1 April 2011.

    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2011-0038.
    Date Filed: February 25, 2011.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: Composite Passenger Tariff Coordinating Conference, 
Geneva, 22 October 2010, Composite Resolutions 017a, 017c, Intended 
Effective Date: 1 April 2011.

    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2011-0039.
    Date Filed: February 25, 2011.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: Composite Passenger Tariff Coordinating Conference, 
Geneva, 22

[[Page 13445]]

October 2010, Composite Resolution 024c, Intended Effective Date: 1 
April 2011.

Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2011-5596 Filed 3-10-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
When you are concerned about 

a student, remember you are not 

alone. You have a team of school 

professionals to support you.

Student assistance professionals are there to help when 

something is going on with a student. They will work with you, 

the student, and the student’s family to develop a complete 

picture of what’s going on and engage resources to help.

www.underagedrinking.samhsa.gov

#TalkTheyHearYou PEP20-03-01-077
Editorial Note on Part 0
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 0 appear at 73 FR 73 FR 54947, Sept. 24, 2008.

§ 0.169 Definition of “gross amount of the original claim”. ( a ) The phrase *gross amount of the original claim* as used in this subpart Y and as applied to any civil fraud claim described in § 0.45(d), shall mean the amount of single damages involved.
( b ) The phrase *gross amount of the original claim* as used in this subpart Y and as applied to any civil claim brought under section 592 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (see § 0.45(c)), shall mean the actual amount of lost customs duties involved. In nonrevenue loss cases brought under section 592 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, the phrase *gross amount of the original claim* shall mean the amount demanded in the United States Customs and Border Protection's mitigation decision issued pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1618 or, if no mitigation decision has been issued, the *gross amount of the original claim* shall mean twenty percent of the dutiable value of the merchandise.
[Order No. 2343-2000, 65 FR 78414, Dec. 15, 2000, as amended by AG Order No. 3532-2015, 80 FR 30619, May 29, 2015]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
EXHIBIT 27.6:  RESTATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's November 30, 1996 Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0000016918
<NAME> CANANDAIGUA BRANDS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                           4,997
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  198,106
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    373,631
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               591,332
<PP&E>                                         356,281
<DEPRECIATION>                                 105,063
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,119,513
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          336,919
<BONDS>                                        349,901
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           214
<OTHER-SE>                                     358,351
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,119,513
<SALES>                                        873,444
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               873,444
<CGS>                                          649,019
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  649,019
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,468
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 37,818
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,065
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             21,753
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,753
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.10
        


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 0
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 0 appear at 73 FR 73 FR 54947, Sept. 24, 2008.

§ 0.94-1 Bureau of Justice Assistance. ( a ) The Bureau of Justice Assistance is headed by a Director appointed by the Attorney General. Under the general authority of the Attorney General and reporting through the Assistant Attorney General, Office of Justice Programs, the Director performs functions and administers programs, including provision of financial assistance, under 42 U.S.C. 3741-3748; 3761-3764; and 3769, relating to the administration of State and local criminal justice systems. The Director also administers the Public Safety Officers' Death Benefits Program under 42 U.S.C. 3796, *et seq.*
( b ) Subject to the authority and direction of the Attorney General, the Director of the Bureau of Justice Assistance is authorized to exercise the power and authority vested in the Attorney General by Executive Order No. 11755 of December 29, 1973, 39 FR 779, with respect to certification and revoking certification of work-release laws or regulations.
[Order No. 1111-85, 50 FR 43385, Oct. 25, 1985; Order No. 1145-86, 51 FR 29464, Aug. 18, 1986]