alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Amazing  Investments,  Inc.,
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"),  the undersigned,  B.
Stephen Bailey,  Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my  knowledge  and
belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §7a–2. Rights, authorities, and liabilities not affected

Nothing in sections 7a to 7a–3 of this title shall be construed to—

(1) affect the rights of the Antitrust Division to seek a stay or protective order in a civil action based on conduct covered by an antitrust leniency agreement to prevent the cooperation described in section 7a–1(b) of this title from impairing or impeding the investigation or prosecution by the Antitrust Division of conduct covered by the agreement;

(2) create any right to challenge any decision by the Antitrust Division with respect to an antitrust leniency agreement; or

(3) affect, in any way, the joint and several liability of any party to a civil action described in section 7a–1(a) of this title, other than that of the antitrust leniency applicant and cooperating individuals as provided in section 7a–1(a) of this title.

(Pub. L. 108–237, title II, §214, June 22, 2004, 118 Stat. 667; Pub. L. 111–190, §4, June 9, 2010, 124 Stat. 1276.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Sections 7a to 7a–3 of this title, referred to in text, was in the original "this subtitle", meaning subtitle A (§§211–216) of title II of Pub. L. 108–237, June 22, 2004, 118 Stat. 666, which enacted this section and sections 7a, 7a–1, and 7a–3 of this title, amended sections 1, 2, and 3 of this title, and enacted provisions formerly set out in a note under section 1 of this title. For complete classification of subtitle A to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly set out in a note under section 1 of this title, prior to transfer to this section upon repeal of sunset provision.

#### Amendments

2010—Par. (1). Pub. L. 111–190, §4(1), made technical amendment to reference in original act which appears in text as reference to section 7a–1(b) of this title.

Par. (3). Pub. L. 111–190, §4(2), made technical amendment to references in original act which appear in two places in text as references to section 7a–1(a) of this title.
// For the NSDUH FAQ view, /data-we-collect/nsduh-national-survey-drug-use-and-health/faq

// assign unique IDs and matching aria-controls
// to each item in an accordion so that the accordion will function
window.onload = function () {
  // Get the elements to assign IDs and aria-controls attributes
  const contentElements = document.querySelectorAll('.usa-accordion__content');
  const headingElements = document.querySelectorAll('.usa-accordion__button');

  // Loop through each element and assign a unique ID and aria-controls attribute
  contentElements.forEach((el, i) => {
    const id = `content-${i}`;
    el.id = id;
    headingElements[i].setAttribute('aria-controls', id);
  });
}

// enable expand/collapse buttons
document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', function () {
  // expand all
  const expandBtn = document.getElementById('expand-all-items');
  expandBtn.addEventListener('click', function () {
    const accordionHeadings = document.querySelectorAll('.nsduh-faq-item-title');
    const accordionContents = document.querySelectorAll('.nsduh-faq-item-content');

    for (let i = 0; i < accordionHeadings.length; i++) {
      const heading = accordionHeadings[i];
      const content = accordionContents[i];

      heading.setAttribute('aria-expanded', 'true');
      content.removeAttribute('hidden');
    }
  });
  // collapse all
  const collapseBtn = document.getElementById('collapse-all-items');
  collapseBtn.addEventListener('click', function () {
    const accordionHeadings = document.querySelectorAll('.nsduh-faq-item-title');
    const accordionContents = document.querySelectorAll('.nsduh-faq-item-content');

    for (let i = 0; i < accordionHeadings.length; i++) {
      const heading = accordionHeadings[i];
      const content = accordionContents[i];

      heading.setAttribute('aria-expanded', 'false');
      content.setAttribute('hidden', '');
    }
  });

  // collapse all accordions on page load
  const accordionHeadings = document.querySelectorAll('.usa-accordion__button');
  const accordionContents = document.querySelectorAll('.usa-accordion__content');

  for (let i = 0; i < accordionHeadings.length; i++) {
    const heading = accordionHeadings[i];
    const content = accordionContents[i];

    heading.setAttribute('aria-expanded', 'false');
    content.setAttribute('hidden', '');
  }
});
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 688 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 688

To amend title 28, United States Code, to add Flagstaff and Yuma to the 
list of locations in which court shall be held in the judicial district 
                       for the State of Arizona.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 6, 2019

Ms. McSally (for herself and Ms. Sinema) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 28, United States Code, to add Flagstaff and Yuma to the 
list of locations in which court shall be held in the judicial district 
                       for the State of Arizona.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISTRICT COURTS IN THE JUDICIAL DISTRICT FOR THE STATE OF 
              ARIZONA.

    Section 82 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by striking 
``Globe, Phoenix, Prescott, and Tucson'' and inserting ``Flagstaff, 
Globe, Phoenix, Prescott, Tucson, and Yuma''.
                                 <all>
```
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-14-00216-CR

Dale Henderson

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

Criminal District Court of Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 12-15103

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

October 16, 2014
# C_2011211EN.01000902.xml

| 16.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/9

---

Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 April 2011 (references for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Suceava (Romania)) — Aurora Elena Sfichi v Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice Suceava, Administrația Finanțelor Publice Suceava, Administrația Fondului pentru Mediu (C-29/11), Adrian Ilaș v Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice Suceava, Administrația Finanțelor Publice Suceava, Administrația Fondului pentru Mediu (C-30/11)

(Joined Cases C-29/11 and C-30/11) (1)

1

(First subparagraph of Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure - Internal taxation - Article 110 TFEU - Pollution tax levied upon first registration of motor vehicles)

2011/C 211/16

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunalul Suceava

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Aurora Elena Sfichi (C-29/11), Adrian Ilaș (C-30/11)

Applicants:

Defendants: Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice Suceava, Administrația Finanțelor Publice Suceava, Administrația Fondului pentru Mediu (C-29/11), Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice Suceava, Administrația Finanțelor Publice Suceava, Administrația Fondului pentru Mediu (C-30/11)

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tribunalul Suceava — Registration of second-hand motor vehicles previously registered in other Member States — National legislation making the first registration of such motor vehicles conditional upon payment of an environmental tax, whereas second-hand motor vehicles already present on the national market are exempt from payment of that tax on the occasion of re-registration — Whether the national legislation is compatible with the first and second paragraphs of Article 110 TFEU — Obstacle to the free movement of goods

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

Article 110 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding a Member State from introducing a pollution tax affecting motor vehicles on their first registration in that Member State, if that fiscal measure is so designed as to discourage the putting into service, in that Member State, of second-hand vehicles bought in other Member States, without, however, discouraging the purchase of second-hand vehicles of the same age and condition on the national market.

---

(1)  OJ C 113, 9.4.2011.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 THAT WERE
FILED WITH THE COMPANY'S REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001101359
<NAME> CEDER GROVE MARKETING, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  DEC-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                 1
<CASH>                          0
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                0
<PP&E>                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           0
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        1
<OTHER-SE>                      (1)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    0
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                0
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                1
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (1)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (1)
<EPS-BASIC>                     0
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0


</TABLE>
### **CHAPTER 55—COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES**

Sec.
3501.
Congressional statement of findings and purpose.
3502.
Definitions.
3503.
Establishment of John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System.
3504.
Limitations on Federal expenditures affecting the System.
3505.
Exceptions to limitations on expenditures.
3506.
Certification of compliance.
3507.
Priority of laws.
3508.
Separability.
3509.
Repealed.
3510.
Authorization of appropriations.
Exhibit 32

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) UNDER

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
AND 18 U.S.C. 1350

Each of the undersigned, the President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Gerber Scientific, Inc., hereby certifies that, on the date hereof:

(i)	The Annual Report on Form 10-K of Gerber Scientific, Inc. for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)	Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Gerber Scientific, Inc.



|Date:  July 9, 2007 | /s/ Marc T. Giles                                                           
|------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                    | Marc T. Giles
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
#### PEOPLE OF THE TERRITORY OF GUAM v. MICHAEL IMAMURA, Defendant

Criminal No. 104F-76

Superior Court of Guam

October 28, 1976

ABBATE, *Judge*

DECISION

Defendant moved the Court to Dismiss, by its Motion filed 20 September, 1976, on the grounds of: (1) noncompliance with this Court’s discovery order and order for production of grand jury testimony, and (2) violation of his 6th Amendment right to a speedy trial. At this motion hearing before this Court on October 20th both sides presented oral arguments and the prosecution filed its memorandum in opposition to the Dismissal Motion.

*368Having duly deliberated on these matters, which were reserved for this later Decision, the Court denies the Motion to Dismiss.

The indictment in this case was filed on May 7,1976. There has been no showing by Defendant that the *5%*month delay to date was intentional or prejudicial in some concrete way to his ability to prepare his case. This Court takes judicial notice of previous motions by Defendant which motions contributed to the pre-trial delay. The balancing test standards explicated in *Barker v. Wingo,*92 S.Ct. 2182 (1972), and cited by this Court in *The People of the Territory of Guam v. Frank Rodney Reyes and Gordon Steve Clay,*5F-74, have not been shown by Defendant.

Nor is Dismissal with Prejudice justified because of non-compliance with the orders of this Court relating to discovery and grand jury testimony. While we condemn late compliance, the prosecution did eventually comply, and we do not feel dismissal is appropriate at this juncture; the prosecution could re-indict, causing further delay. Defendant failed to show sufficient prejudice resulting from the delayed compliance.

All courts are most reluctant to dismiss without prejudice or exclude the prosecution’s use of the discovered evidence, but this Court will take such drastic action if there is further unjustified delay.

Submit order.
### §8811. National Quantum Initiative Program

#### (a) In general

The President shall implement a National Quantum Initiative Program.

#### (b) Requirements

In carrying out the Program, the President, acting through Federal agencies, councils, working groups, subcommittees, and the Coordination Office, as the President considers appropriate, shall—

(1) establish the goals, priorities, and metrics for a 10-year plan to accelerate development of quantum information science and technology applications in the United States;

(2) invest in fundamental Federal quantum information science and technology research, development, demonstration, and other activities to achieve the goals established under paragraph (1);

(3) invest in activities to develop a quantum information science and technology workforce pipeline;

(4) provide for interagency planning and coordination of Federal quantum information science and technology research, development, demonstration, standards engagement, and other activities under the Program;

(5) partner with industry and universities to leverage knowledge and resources; and

(6) leverage existing Federal investments efficiently to advance Program goals and priorities established under paragraph (1).

(Pub. L. 115–368, title I, §101, Dec. 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 5094.)

#### Termination of Section

For termination of section, see section 8815 of this title.
#### § 115.54 Third-party reporting.

The agency shall establish a method to receive third-party reports of sexual abuse and sexual harassment and shall distribute publicly information on how to report sexual abuse and sexual harassment on behalf of an inmate.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, December 10, 2020. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, December 10, 2020 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A21A0596. SIDNEY KELLY v. KIMBERLY MORRISON.
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion the hereby GRANTED, and jurisdiction is released back to the trial court upon receipt of this order.
### SUBCHAPTER I—NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Gilman Ciocia, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, Michael Ryan, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:
/s/ Michael RyanName:
Michael RyanChief Executive OfficerDate:
October 13, 2010
### §1338. Criminal provisions

#### (a) Violations; penalties; trial

Any person who—

(1) willfully removes or attempts to remove a wild free-roaming horse or burro from the public lands, without authority from the Secretary, or

(2) converts a wild free-roaming horse or burro to private use, without authority from the Secretary, or

(3) maliciously causes the death or harassment of any wild free-roaming horse or burro, or

(4) except as provided in section 1333(e) of this title, processes or permits to be processed into commercial products the remains of a wild free-roaming horse or burro, or

(5) sells, directly or indirectly, a wild free-roaming horse or burro maintained on private or leased land pursuant to section 1334 of this title, or the remains thereof, or

(6) willfully violates a regulation issued pursuant to this chapter,

shall be subject to a fine of not more than $2,000, or imprisonment for not more than one year, or both. Any person so charged with such violation by the Secretary may be tried and sentenced by any United States commissioner or magistrate judge designated for that purpose by the court by which he was appointed, in the same manner and subject to the same conditions as provided for in section 3401 of title 18.

#### (b) Arrest; appearance for examination or trial; warrants: issuance and execution

Any employee designated by the Secretary of the Interior or the Secretary of Agriculture shall have power, without warrant, to arrest any person committing in the presence of such employee a violation of this chapter or any regulation made pursuant thereto, and to take such person immediately for examination or trial before an officer or court of competent jurisdiction, and shall have power to execute any warrant or other process issued by an officer or court of competent jurisdiction to enforce the provisions of this chapter or regulations made pursuant thereto. Any judge of a court established under the laws of the United States, or any United States magistrate judge may, within his respective jurisdiction, upon proper oath or affirmation showing probable cause, issue warrants, in all such cases.

(Pub. L. 92–195, §8, Dec. 15, 1971, 85 Stat. 650; Pub. L. 101–650, title III, §321, Dec. 1, 1990, 104 Stat. 5117; Pub. L. 108–447, div. E, title I, §142(b), Dec. 8, 2004, 118 Stat. 3071.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2004—Subsec. (a)(4). Pub. L. 108–447 inserted "except as provided in section 1333(e) of this title," before "processes or permits".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"United States magistrate judge" and "magistrate judge" substituted for "United States magistrate" and "magistrate", respectively, in text pursuant to section 321 of Pub. L. 101–650, set out as a note under section 631 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                          50,004
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                50,004
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 116,347
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           73,219
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        32,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   116,347
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,459
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (8,459)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>