alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Amazing  Investments,  Inc.,
on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  December  31,  2001 as filed  with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "REPORT"),  the
undersigned, B. Stephen Bailey, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Dana S. Philbrook, hereby certify that:

(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Service Bancorp, Inc.;

(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4) The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business
issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and

(5) The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability
to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal controls over financial reporting.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ DANA S. PHILBROOK  
|Dana S. Philbrook      
|Chief Financial Officer
|February 14, 2007
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 

Lake Sunapee Bank Group 

Named Executive Officer Incentive Plan 

2016 Goals 
  

											
	 Goal
	  	Weight	 	12/31/2015	  	Threshold	 	Target	 	Superior
	 1) Net Income
	  	40%	 	$9,029,000	  	$9,200,000 to
$9,500,000	 	$9,500,001 to
$10,000,000	 	$10,000,001+
						
		  		 	Factor Available:	  	1.000%	 	2.000%	 	4.000%
						
	 2) Gross Loan Growth
	  	20%	 	$1,222,108,000	  	+$30 million
($1,252,000,000+)	 	+$40 million
($1,262,000,000+)	 	+$60 million
($1,322,000,000+)
						
		  		 	Factor Available:	  	0.50%	 	1.00%	 	2.00%
						
	 3) Asset Quality
	  	15%	 	0.49%	  	NPL/Loans < 1%	 	NPL/Loans < .50%	 	NPL/Loans < .35%
						
		  		 	Factor Available:	  	0.38%	 	0.75%	 	1.50%
						
	 4) Deposit Growth
	  	15%	 	$1,157,352,000	  	Increase of less than 4%	 	+4% Growth
(>$1,203,645,000)	 	+5% Growth
(>$1,215,220,000)
						
		  		 	Factor Available:	  	0.38%	 	0.75%	 	1.50%
						
	 5) Individual Goals
	  	10%	 	Factor Available:	  	0.25%	 	0.500%	 	1.000%
						
	 Totals
	  	100%	 	Total Factor Available:	  	Maximum Threshold  

2.50%
	 	Maximum Target  

5.00%
	 	Maximum Superior  

10.00%


  

	*	In order to activate the plan, the Threshold levels for Goals #1 and #5 must be obtained, and acceptable regulatory ratings maintained. 


	1)	Net income: Consolidated Net Income, as reported in SEC Filings, including impact of incentive expense and all discretionary bonuses. 


	2)	Gross Loan Growth: Growth of gross loans held in portfolio, as disclosed in SEC Filings, at 12/31/16 compared to gross loans held in portfolio at 12/31/15, as disclosed in SEC Filings. 


	3)	Asset Quality is calculated by dividing the amount of Non-Performing Loans (NPL) to total loans at 12/31/16. 


	4)	Deposit growth: Percent of growth comparing deposits, as disclosed in SEC Filings, at 12/31/16 compared deposits at 12/31/15, as disclosed in SEC Filings. 


	5)	Three individual goals per Executive, with satisfactory completion (as determined by Executive’s respective reporting authority) of 1 of 3 necessary for Threshold; 2 of 3 for Target; and 3 of 3 for Superior.
# C_2013009EN.01001502.xml

| 12.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 9/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 November 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Asylgerichtshof (Austria)) — K v Bundesasylamt

(Case C-245/11) (1)

1

(Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 - Determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national - Humanitarian clause - Article 15 of that regulation - Person who enjoys asylum in a Member State and is dependent on the assistance of an asylum seeker because she suffers from a serious illness - Article 15(2) of the regulation - Obligation on that Member State, which is not responsible according to the criteria laid down in Chapter III of that regulation, to examine the application for asylum made by that asylum seeker - Conditions)

2013/C 9/23

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Asylgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: K

Applicant:

Defendant: Bundesasylamt

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Asylgerichtshof — Interpretation of Article 3(2) and Article 15 of Council Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 of 18 February 2003 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national (OJ 2003 L 50, p. 1) — Responsibility of a Member State to examine, for humanitarian reasons, an application for asylum made to it, even if it is not responsible for that examination in accordance with the criteria set out in Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 — Close relationship between the asylum-seeker and a person who is very vulnerable and who already enjoys the right to asylum in that Member State

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

In circumstances such as those in the main proceedings, Article 15(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 of 18 February 2003 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national must be interpreted as meaning that a Member State which is not responsible for examining an application for asylum pursuant to the criteria laid down in Chapter III of that regulation becomes so responsible. It is for the Member State which has become the responsible Member State within the meaning of that regulation to assume the obligations which go along with that responsibility. It must inform in that respect the Member State previously responsible. This interpretation of Article 15(2) also applies where the Member State which was responsible pursuant to the criteria laid down in Chapter III of Regulation No 343/2003 did not make a request in that regard in accordance with the second sentence of Article 15(1) of that regulation.

---

(1)  OJ C 269, 10.9.2011.

1

---
Chemical equation

This is CBI
#### § 12.3 Prior registration with the Foreign Agents Registration Unit.

No person who has filed a registration statement under the terms of the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended by section 20(a) of the Internal Security Act of 1950, shall be required to file a registration statement under the act, unless otherwise determined by the Chief, Registration Unit.

[21 FR 5928, Aug. 8, 1956, as amended by Order No. 524-73, 38 FR 18235, July 9, 1973; Order No. 960-81, 46 FR 52355, Oct. 27, 1981]
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Document Search 

# Document search

## Document Listing Lookup

                      -  -                 Report            
2022 Weekly Lending Reports    Related programs:            7(a),           CDC/504,           Community Advantage                Summary:            SBA offers a variety of loan programs for very specific purposes. These reports detail weekly lending activity for SBA loan programs.   
                      -  -                 Report            
2019 Weekly Lending Reports      Summary:            SBA offers a variety of loan programs for very specific purposes. These reports detail weekly lending activity for SBA loan programs.   
                      -  -                 Report            
2021 Weekly Lending Reports      Summary:            SBA offers a variety of loan programs for very specific purposes. These reports detail weekly lending activity for SBA loan programs.   
                      -  -                 Report            
2020 Weekly Lending Reports      Summary:            SBA offers a variety of loan programs for very specific purposes. These reports detail weekly lending activity for SBA loan programs.   
                      -  -                 Report            
2018 Weekly Lending Reports      Summary:            SBA offers a variety of loan programs for very specific purposes. These reports detail 2018 weekly lending activity for SBA loan programs.   
                      -  -                 Report            
2017 Weekly Lending Reports      Summary:            SBA offers a variety of loan programs for very specific purposes. These reports detail 2017 weekly lending activity for SBA loan programs.
###### Editorial Note on Part 0

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 0 appear at 73 FR 73 FR 54947, Sept. 24, 2008.

#### § 0.71 Delegation respecting immunity matters.

The Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Tax Division is authorized to handle matters involving the immunity of the Federal Government from State or local taxation (except actions to set aside ad valorem taxes, assessments, special assessments, and tax sales of Federal real property, and matters involving payments in lieu of taxes), as well as State or local taxation involving contractors performing contracts for or on behalf of the United States.
# C_2012217EN.01000401.xml

| 21.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 7 June 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — VBV — Vorsorgekasse AG v Finanzmarktaufsichtsbehörde (FMA)

(Case C-39/11) (1)

1

(Free movement of capital - Articles 63 TFEU and 65 TFEU - Severance funds - Investment of assets - Investment funds established in another Member State - Investment in such funds permitted only when they are authorised to market their units within the national territory)

2012/C 217/06

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Verwaltungsgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: VBV — Vorsorgekasse AG

Applicant:

Defendant: Finanzmarktaufsichtsbehörde (FMA)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Interpretation of Article 63 et seq. TFEU — Free movement of capital — Severance funds investing mandatory contributions in respect of employed and self-employed persons aimed to finance severance sums — Legislation of a Member State restricting those investments to funds which have been authorised to be sold in that national territory

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 63(1) TFEU must be interpreted as precluding national legislation which does not permit a severance fund, or the undertaking for collective investment created by that severance fund to manage its assets, to invest those assets in units of an investment fund established in another Member State unless that investment fund has been authorised to market its units within the national territory.

---

(1)  OJ C 130, 30.4.2011.

1

---
§ 2.49 Place of revocation hearing. ( a ) If the parolee requests a local revocation hearing, he shall be given a revocation hearing reasonably near the place of the alleged violation(s) or arrest, if the following conditions are met: ( 1 ) The parolee has not been convicted of a crime committed while under supervision; and
( 2 ) The parolee denies that he has violated any condition of his release.
( b ) The parolee shall also be given a local revocation hearing if he admits (or has been convicted of) one or more charged violations, but denies at least one unadjudicated charge that may be determinative of the Commission's decision regarding revocation and/or reparole, and requests the presence of one or more adverse witnesses regarding that contested charge. If the appearance of such witness at the hearing is precluded by the Commission for good cause, a local revocation hearing shall not be ordered.
( c ) If there are two or more alleged violations, the hearing may be conducted near the place of the violation chiefly relied upon as a basis for the issuance of the warrant or summons as determined by the Regional Commissioner.
( d ) ( 1 ) A parolee shall be given an institutional revocation hearing upon the parolee's return or recommitment to an institution if the parolee: ( i ) Voluntarily waives the right to a local revocation hearing; or
( ii ) Admits (or has been convicted of) one or more charged violations without contesting any unadjudicated charge that may be determinative of the Commission's decision regarding revocation and/or reparole.
( 2 ) On his own motion, the Regional Commissioner may designate any case described in paragraph (d)(1) of this section for a local revocation hearing. The difference in procedures between a “local revocation hearing” and an “institutional revocation hearing” is set forth in § 2.50(c).
( e ) A parolee retaken on a warrant issued by the Commission shall be retained in custody until final action relative to revocation of his release, unless otherwise ordered by the Regional Commissioner under § 2.48(e)(2). A parolee who has been given a revocation hearing pursuant to the issuance of a summons under § 2.44 shall remain on supervision pending the decision of the Commission.
( f ) A local revocation hearing shall be scheduled to be held within sixty days of the probable cause determination. Institutional revocation hearings shall be scheduled to be held within ninety days of the date of the execution of the violator warrant upon which the parolee was retaken. However, if a parolee requests and receives any postponement or consents to a postponed revocation proceeding, or if a parolee by his actions otherwise precludes the prompt conduct of such proceedings, the above-stated time limits may be extended. A local revocation hearing may be conducted by a hearing examiner, hearing examiner panel, or other official designated by the Regional Commissioner.
[42 FR 39809, Aug. 5, 1977, as amended at 44 FR 3408, 3409, Jan. 16, 1979; 68 FR 41530, July 14, 2003]
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

I, Paul C. Samek, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of CellStar Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

/s/ Paul C.Samek                                    

Paul C. Samek, Chief Financial Officer 

 

Date: February 25, 2004
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-11-0607 SAT Date: 9/7/2011 Print Date: 8/1/2012
Related cases : Health related cases : Ecotox related cases:

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 1 3

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 1 11

Exposure Based Review : Health: Yes Ecotox: Yes Routes of exposure : Health: Dermal Drinking Water Inhalation Consumer; all for XB assessment Ecotox: All releases to water Fate: ;

P 2 Rec Comments : Comment: P2REC: SAT: Forward Keywords : Keywords: AQUATOX Summary of Assessment : Fate : Fate Summary: P-11-0607 FATE:log Koc = 6.29 (E) log Fish BCF = 1.22 (E) log Fish BAF = 1.37 (E) POTW removal (%) = 0 Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk-mo Sorption to soils/sediments = moderate - strong PBT Potential: P1B1 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = slow - moderate
Health : Health Summary: N ot absorbed through the skin as the neat material poor absorption through the skin if in solution ( p che m ), p oor absorption from the lungs and GI tract ( p che m ). N o significant health concerns. Test Data: rat 7-day oral NOEL = 1000 mg/kg (highest dose tested) [other acute testing in progress]
Ecotox : Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments
fish 96-h LC50 2.4 daphnid 48-h LC50 1.6 green algal 96-h EC50 13 fish

_ chronic value 0.063 daphnid

_ chronic value 0.062 algal

_ chronic value 5.7 Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for and neutral organic chemicals; SAR chemical class = effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations ; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;
Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) 6
SARs and neutralorganic chemicals SAR Class Ecotox Category
Ecotox Factors Comments: SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
### §717e. Ascertainment of cost of property

#### (a) Cost of property

The Commission may investigate and ascertain the actual legitimate cost of the property of every natural-gas company, the depreciation therein, and, when found necessary for rate-making purposes, other facts which bear on the determination of such cost or depreciation and the fair value of such property.

#### (b) Inventory of property; statements of costs

Every natural-gas company upon request shall file with the Commission an inventory of all or any part of its property and a statement of the original cost thereof, and shall keep the Commission informed regarding the cost of all additions, betterments, extensions, and new construction.

(June 21, 1938, ch. 556, §6, 52 Stat. 824.)