alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Exhibit 23
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-21951 on Form S-3, Registration
Statement No. 333-44787 on Form S-3, and Registration Statement No. 333-121526 on Form S-8,
of MFRI, Inc. of our report dated May 14, 2004, (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and
includes an explanatory paragraph as to MFRI Inc.s change in its method of accounting for goodwill
and intangible assets) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of MFRI, Inc. and subsidiaries
for the year ended January 31, 2005.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLPChicago, IllinoisMay 11, 2005

|53
|--
# C_2011113EN.01000602.xml

| 9.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/6

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (Belgium), lodged on 26 January 2011 — Inter-Environnement Wallonie ASBL, Terre wallonne ASBL v Région wallonne

(Case C-41/11)

2011/C 113/11

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Inter-Environnement Wallonie ASBL, Terre wallonne ASBL

Applicants:

Defendant: Région wallonne

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Can the Conseil d’État,

| — | seised of an action seeking the annulment of the decree of the Government of Wallonia of 15 February 2007 amending Book II of the Environment Code, which forms the Water Code, as regards the sustainable management of nitrogen in agriculture, |
| --- | --- |

—

seised of an action seeking the annulment of the decree of the Government of Wallonia of 15 February 2007 amending Book II of the Environment Code, which forms the Water Code, as regards the sustainable management of nitrogen in agriculture,

| — | finding that that decree was adopted without compliance with the procedure prescribed by Directive 2001/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2001 on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment (1) and that it is, for that reason, contrary to the law of the European Union and must be annulled, |
| --- | --- |

—

finding that that decree was adopted without compliance with the procedure prescribed by Directive 2001/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2001 on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment (1) and that it is, for that reason, contrary to the law of the European Union and must be annulled,

1

| — | but finding at the same time that the contested decree provides for an appropriate implementation of Council Directive 91/676/EEC of 12 December 1991 concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources, (2) |
| --- | --- |

—

but finding at the same time that the contested decree provides for an appropriate implementation of Council Directive 91/676/EEC of 12 December 1991 concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources, (2)

2

| — | defer in time the effects of the judicial annulment for a short period necessary for the redrafting of the annulled measure in order to maintain in European Union environmental law a degree of specific implementation without any break in continuity? |
| --- | --- |

—

defer in time the effects of the judicial annulment for a short period necessary for the redrafting of the annulled measure in order to maintain in European Union environmental law a degree of specific implementation without any break in continuity?

---

(1)  OJ 2001 L 197, p. 30.

1

(2)  OJ 1991 L 375, p. 1.

2

---
#### § 4.108 Contents of application for exemption from provisions other than licensing.

An application for exemption of a small hydroelectric power project from provisions of Part I of the Act other than the licensing requirement need not be prepared according to any specific format, but must be included as an identified appendix to the related application for license or amendment of license. The application for exemption must list all sections or subsections of Part I of the Act for which exemption is requested.

[Order 106, 45 FR 76123, Nov. 18, 1980]
### U.S. DEPARTMENT OF' ENERGY OFFICE OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS FOR CLOTHES WASHERS PRELIMINARY AGENDA
LOCATION OF PUBLIC HEARING:

DATE AND TIME: FORRESTAL BUILDING 1000 INDEPENDENCE AVENUE, SW ROOM6E-069 WASHINGTON, DC 20585 TELEPHONE: 202-586-9127 TELEFAX: 202-256-4617 WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 15, 2000 9:00 A.M.

- 2:45 P.M. PURPOSE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING: The purpose ofthis public hearing is to hear the views ofinterested persons on the issues and process involved in a rulemaking to consider energy efficiency standards for clothes washers. The Department will consider the views presented and comments submitted in preparing the final rule.
9:00

- 9:05 am Opening remarks (Berringer) 9:05

- 9: 15 am Agenda review and overview (Brookman) 9:15

- 10:15 am Participants' remarks (Participants are toprovide their general, overview comments on the proposedrule. Comments are to be limitedtojive minutes.) 10: 15

- 10:30 am BREAK



### A discussiolll ofissues on which DOE has received comments and/or requests to speak. 10:30

- 11 :00 am Test procedures (A discussion of theproposedamendments to the testprocedure, including the correction factor for test cloth.) 11 :00 am - 12:00 pm Rulemaking process (A discussion of the negotiationprocess andthe opportunity forparties to provide comment to the Department. 12:00

- 1:00 pm LUNCH

### 1:00 - 1:30 pm Energy and economic analyses (A discussion of the inputs to the engineering andeconomic analyses.) 

### 1:30- 2:00 pm Impacts ofstandards (A discussion of the impacts of theproposedstandards.) 

### 2:00

- 2:30 pm Other issues (A discussion of issues not otherwise covered.) 

### 2:30

- 2:45 pm Recap (Berringer) 

### 2:45 pm Adjourn
### §80a–44. Disclosure of information filed with Commission; copies

(a) The information contained in any registration statement, application, report, or other document filed with the Commission pursuant to any provision of this subchapter or of any rule or regulation thereunder (as distinguished from any information or document transmitted to the Commission) shall be made available to the public, unless and except insofar as the Commission, by rules and regulations upon its own motion, or by order upon application, finds that public disclosure is neither necessary nor appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of investors. Except as provided in section 78x(c) of this title, it shall be unlawful for any member, officer, or employee of the Commission to use for personal benefit, or to disclose to any person other than an official or employee of the United States or of a State, for official use, or for any such official or employee to use for personal benefit, any information contained in any document so filed or transmitted, if such information is not available to the public.

(b) Photostatic or other copies of information contained in documents filed with the Commission under this subchapter and made available to the public shall be furnished any person at such reasonable charge and under such reasonable limitations as the Commission shall prescribe.

(Aug. 22, 1940, ch. 686, title I, §45, 54 Stat. 845; Pub. L. 101–550, title II, §202(b)(1), Nov. 15, 1990, 104 Stat. 2715.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1990—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 101–550 substituted "Except as provided in section 78x(c) of this title, it shall be unlawful" for "It shall be unlawful".

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of Securities and Exchange Commission, with certain exceptions, to Chairman of such Commission, see Reorg. Plan No. 10 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3175, 64 Stat. 1265, set out under section 78d of this title.
§ 401.39 Form of submission of projects. ( a ) *Submission constituting application.* Where a project is subject to review under section 3.8 of the Compact, the submission shall be in accordance with such form of application as the Executive Director may prescribe and with such supporting documentation as the Executive Director may reasonably require for the administration of the provisions of the Compact. An application shall be deemed complete and the Commission's review of the application may commence upon submission of the completed form in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section, and payment of the applicable fee as set forth in § 401.43 together with all balances due the Commission, if any, by the applicant or any member of its corporate structure, for unpaid fees, penalties, or interest.
( b ) *Submission of applications.* Application forms and accompanying submissions shall be filed in accordance with the filing instructions included on the application form.
( c ) *Availability of forms.* Any person may obtain a copy of any form prescribed for use in paragraph (a) of this section on the Commission's website, *https://www.drbc.gov .*
[89 FR 51825, June 20, 2024]
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Harvest  Valley  Ventures,
Inc., on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  December 31, 2001 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned, B. Stephen Bailey, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 367.4330 Account 433, Balance transferred from income.

This account must include the net credit or debit transferred from income for the year.
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Bruno Lafont, Chief Executive Officer of Lafarge, a société anonyme organized under French law, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Lafarge on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, to my knowledge, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Lafarge as of the dates and for the periods set forth therein.:









|Date: March 24, 2006 | /s/   Bruno Lafont
      Bruno Lafont
Chief Executive Officer
|-------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------







A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Lafarge and will be retained by Lafarge and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### **CHAPTER 37—YOUTH CONSERVATION CORPS AND PUBLIC LANDS CORPS**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—YOUTH CONSERVATION CORPS

Sec.
1701.
Congressional declaration of policy and purpose.
1702.
Establishment.
1703.
Duties and functions of Secretary of the Interior and Secretary of Agriculture.
1704.
Grants to States.
1705.
Repealed.
1706.
Authorization of appropriations.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—PUBLIC LANDS CORPS

1721.
Congressional findings and purpose.
1722.
Definitions.
1723.
Public Lands Corps program.
1724.
Conservation centers and program support.
1725.
Resource assistants.
1725a.
Direct hire authority.
1725b.
Forest Service hire authority.
1726.
Compensation and terms of service.
1727.
National service educational awards.
1727a.
Reporting and data collection.
1727b.
Indian Youth Service Corps.
1728.
Nondisplacement.
1729.
Funding.
1730.
Authorization of appropriations.
# STATEOFLOUISIANA

COURTOFAPPEAL,FIRSTCIRCUIT

GERALD TAYLOR VERSUS LTAC HOSPITAL OF FELICIANA, LLC D/B/A AMG SPECIALTY HOSPITAL NO. 

### 2021 CW 1232

MARCH 4, 

### 2022

In Re: 

### LTAC Hospital of Feliciana, LLC D/B/A AMC 

### Specialty Hospital, applying for supervisory writs, 19th Judicial 

### District Court, Parish of 

### East Baton 

### Rouge, No. 698791.

BEFORE: 

### GUIDRY, HOLDRIDGE, AND CHUTZ, JJ.

WRIT GRANTED. The 

### judgment of the 

### district court dated September 

### 20, 2021, 

## denying the motion 

### for summary judgment filed 

## by defendant, LTAC Hospital of Feliciana, LLC D/B/A AMC 

## Specialty Hospital, is reversed. As to 

### his medical malpractice claims, the plaintiff, Gerald Taylor, 

### failed to produce 

### factual support sufficient to establish the existence of a genuine issue of material 

### fact as to a causal 

### link between the 

### defendant's alleged negligent action and the plaintiff' s 

## injury, which 

### is a 

### necessary element of his claim. See La. R. S. 

### 9: 2794(A); Samaha v. Rau, 

### 2007- 1726 ( La. 

### 2/26/08), 977 So.2d 880, 883-4. Further, regarding the plaintiff' s negligent 

### infliction of emotional distress claims, 

### he failed to produce factual support sufficient to establish a genuine 

### issue of material fact 

### regarding the emotional 

## severityof his damages, which is an essential element of his claim. See Moresi v. State Through Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, 567 

### So.2d 1081, 

### 1095 ( La. 

### 1990). Therefore, the motion 

### for summary judgment 

## filed by the defendant 

### is granted, and the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.
JMG GH WRC

COURT OFAPPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
### §202. Repairs to standards

Such necessary repairs and adjustments shall be made to the standards furnished to the several States and Territories as may be requested by the governors thereof, and also to standard weights and measures that have been or may be supplied to United States customhouses and other offices of the United States under Act of Congress, when requested by the Secretary of Commerce.

(July 11, 1890, ch. 667, §1, 26 Stat. 242; Feb. 14, 1903, ch. 552, §§4, 10, 32 Stat. 826, 829; Mar. 4, 1913, ch. 141, §1, 37 Stat. 736.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Act Mar. 4, 1913, created Department of Labor and renamed Department of Commerce and Labor as Department of Commerce.

#### Transfer of Functions

Act Feb. 14, 1903, transferred National Bureau of Standards from Treasury Department to Department of Commerce and Labor.
§ 806.43 Metering and monitoring requirements. ( a ) As a part of the registration process, the Commission shall review the current metering and monitoring for grandfathered withdrawals and consumptive uses.
( b ) The Commission may require a metering and monitoring plan for the project sponsor to follow.
( c ) Project sponsors, as an ongoing obligation of their registration, shall report to the Commission all information specified in the grandfathering determination under § 806.44 in a form and manner determined by the Commission. If water withdrawal and consumptive use quantity reporting is required by the member jurisdiction where the project is located, the Commission shall accept that reported quantity to satisfy the requirements of this paragraph (c), unless the Commission finds that additional data is needed that is not required by the member jurisdiction.
( d ) Any data generated or collected under paragraph (c) of this section will be made available to the member jurisdictions in a manner and timeframe mutually agreeable to both the Commission and the jurisdiction.
NUMBER 13-19-00571-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

JACK GERALD LARKINS, Appellant,

v.

ANGELA KIM LARKINS, Appellee.

On appeal from the County Court at Law

of Kleberg County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Tijerina

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Longoria

Appellant Jack Gerald Larkins, proceeding pro se, filed a notice of appeal from a 

final decree of divorce. The appellant’s brief in the above cause was originally due on 

March 5, 2020. The appellant has previously requested and received three prior 

extensions of time to file his brief. On October 20, 2020, the Clerk of this Court notified 
2

the appellant that his brief had not been timely filed and that his appeal was subject to 

dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), 

unless within ten days from the date of this letter, the appellant reasonably explained the 

failure and the appellee was not significantly injured by the appellant’s failure to timely file 

a brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a); id. R. 42.3(b). To date, the appellant has not filed a 

response to the Court’s directive. To date, the appellant has failed to either reasonably 

explain his failure to file a brief, file a motion for extension of time to file his brief, or file 

his brief. 

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and the 

appellant’s failure to file his brief, is of the opinion that this appeal should be dismissed.

See id. R. 38.8(a) (authorizing the court to “dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution,”

if appellant fails to timely file a brief, “unless the appellant reasonably explains the failure 

and the appellee is not significantly injured by the appellant’s failure to timely file a brief”); 

id. R. 42.3(b),(c) (authorizing the court to dismiss an appeal “for want of prosecution” or

“because the appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of [the appellate rules], a 

court order, or a notice from the clerk requiring a response or other action within a 

specified time”); Smith v. DC Civil Constr., LLC, 521 S.W.3d 75, 76 (Tex. App.—San 

Antonio 2017, no pet.). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution and 

because the appellant failed to comply with the requirements of the appellate rules and 

directives from the Clerk. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b),(c).

NORA L. LONGORIA

Justice

Delivered and filed the

7th day of January, 2021.
Indiana State SBIRT Summary

1.            Program Description & Model

The Indiana State SBIRT Program is a partnership between the Indiana Division of Mental Health and Addiction and Community Health Centers (CHCs) in the state.  Training and technical support are provided through the Indiana Prevention Resource Center at the Indiana University School of Public Health – Bloomington.  

The project initially involved Eskenazi Health’s ten (10) CHCs in Marion County (primarily Indianapolis) to integrate SBIRT as a standard of care within their primary care services. The goal is to provide annual SBIRT screening to all adult patients.  As the SBIRT protocol is introduced into each of the Marion County CHCs, Indiana SBIRT is also expanding into other areas of the state by offering expansion grants to offset the administrative expenses involved with training and other start-up costs. Over the course of the five-year project, Indiana SBIRT is planning to provide SBIRT services to 80,000 unique individuals in programs designed to continue well into the future.

2.            Special/Unique Features

The “We Ask Everyone” campaign used in the CHCs is intended to encourage clinicians and patients alike to view SBIRT as the new standard of care for all adult patients.  Individuals are not selected for SBIRT because they meet specific criteria.  Rather, everyone benefits from screening feedback, even if it is encouragement to maintain their healthy habits.

Indiana currently receives three SAMHSA SBIRT grants: Medical Residency, Statewide, and the recently initiated Medical Professional grant.  The Policy Steering Committees for all three of these projects include members from the other two in order to ensure maximum collaboration, shared resources and optimal sustainability.  

Members of the State Policy Steering Committee (PSC) also serve on the Indiana Primary and Behavioral Healthcare Integration (PBHCI) Workgroup.  This workgroup is an advisory committee to the Mental Health and Addiction Planning and Advisory Council (MHAPAC) which vets all activities related to the Substance Abuse Prevention and Treatment Block Grant for Indiana.  Whereas the original members of the State SBIRT Policy Steering Committee were focused on SBIRT in Marion County, the PSC will now focus on statewide expansion of SBIRT by including members of the PBHCI Workgroup, including members from the State Health Department, Office of Medicaid Policy and Planning, state Primary Care Association and managed care entities responsible for Medicaid reimbursement.

3.            Website URL (if applicable)

www.IndianaSBIRT.org

4.            Contact information for the project director

Dennis Ailes

Dennis.Ailes@fssa.in.gov

317-232-7883