alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  SBA District Offices 
-  West Texas 
-  Doing Business In The West Texas District 

# Doing business in the West Texas District

## Business requirements

SBA’s Business Guide lists the requirements needed to start, grow, and expand your business. Since laws and taxes vary by state, here’s what you need to do before starting your business in our area.

### Business name and registration

Register your business name with the county clerk where your business is located. If you are a corporation, you will also need to register with the Secretary of State.

### Business licensing and zoning

Licenses are typically administered by a variety of state and local departments. It is important to consider zoning regulations when choosing a site for your business. Contact the local business license office where you plan to locate your business. You may not be permitted to conduct business out of your home or engage in industrial activity in a retail district.

### Taxes

Lubbock Taxpayer Assistance Centers1205 Texas Ave., Room 606Lubbock, TX 79401 Phone: 806-401-8891

Texas Department of Revenue Services111 E. 17th St.Austin, Texas 78774

### Health and safety

Texas Department of Labor101 E. 15th St., Room 651Austin, TX 78778Phone: 512-475-2670

Texas OSHA1205 Texas Ave., Room 806Lubbock, TX 79401Phone: 806-472-7681

## State small business profiles

Need information on the local business landscape? SBA's Office of Advocacy has the latest demographic and statistics on local small business economic activity.

##  Local assistance

          Find counselors        

## SBA lending in our area

-  Loan programs              Learn more about SBA's 7(a) loans, 504 loans, and microloans that you can use for your business.                  Find a loan 
-  Lender Match              Describe your business needs and get matched with an SBA-backed lender in your area.                  Get matched with a lender 
-  Lending activity reports              View 7(a) and 504 lending activity reports from our district.                  View lending reports 

## Additional local resources

###         State and local governments      

                    -  State of Texas Website 
                    -  Office of the Texas Comptroller: Business Resources 
                    -  Texas Workforce Commission 
                    -  Texas Economic Development 
                    -  Texas Travel Industry Recovery Grant Program 

###         Community organizations      

                    -  Texas Tech University Institute for Small Business 

##           Download our guide to SBA resources        

Learn about the opportunities available for small businesses nationwide.

Download English version PDFDownload Spanish version PDF
§ 1318.301 Public and stakeholder participation in the EA process. ( a ) The NEPA compliance staff, in consultation with the initiating TVA entity and other interested offices, may request public involvement in the preparation of an EA or a revision to or a supplement thereof. The type of and format for public involvement shall be selected as appropriate to best facilitate timely and meaningful public input to the EA process. In deciding the extent of public involvement, TVA will consider whether the public has already been provided a meaningful opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of a proposal through other coordinated, regulatory processes.
( b ) TVA will also identify and involve Indian tribes and interested stakeholders including local, State and other Federal agencies.
( c ) A draft EA prepared for an action listed in § 1318.400(a), for which TVA would normally prepare an EIS, shall be circulated for public review and comment.
( d ) TVA will make draft (if applicable) and final EAs and FONSIs available on TVA's public website and by other means upon request to TVA.
§ 385.712 Commission review of initial decisions in the absence of exceptions (Rule 712). ( a ) *General rule.* If no briefs on exceptions to an initial decision are filed within the time established by rule or order under Rule 711, the Commission may, within 10 days after the expiration of such time, issue an order staying the effectiveness of the decision pending Commission review.
( b ) *Briefs and argument.* When the Commission reviews a decision under this section, the Commission may require that participants file briefs or present oral arguments on any issue.
( c ) *Effect of review.* After completing review under this section, the Commission will issue a decision which is final for purposes of rehearing under Rule 713.
[Order 225, 47 FR 19022, May 3, 1982, as amended by Order 375, 49 FR 21316, May 21, 1984; Order 575, 60 FR 4860, Jan. 25, 1995]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-2305

RICHARD NGUTI ADE,

Petitioner,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals.

Submitted: April 16, 2010 Decided: May 5, 2010

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kell Enow, ENOW & ASSOCIATES IMMIGRATION PRACTICE, Marietta, 

Georgia, for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, 

Ernesto H. Molina, Jr., Assistant Director, Jeffery R. Leist, 

Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF 

JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Richard Nguti Ade, a native and citizen of Cameroon,

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s 

denial of his requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and 

protection under the Convention Against Torture.

Ade first challenges the determination that he failed 

to establish his eligibility for asylum. To obtain reversal of 

a determination denying eligibility for relief, an alien “must 

show that the evidence he presented was so compelling that no 

reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of 

persecution.” INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 483-84 

(1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and conclude 

that Ade fails to show that the evidence compels a contrary 

result. We therefore find that substantial evidence supports 

the denial of relief.

Additionally, we uphold the denial of Ade’s request 

for withholding of removal. “Because the burden of proof for 

withholding of removal is higher than for asylum--even though 

the facts that must be proved are the same--an applicant who is 

ineligible for asylum is necessarily ineligible for withholding 

of removal under [8 U.S.C.] § 1231(b)(3).” Camara v. Ashcroft, 

378 F.3d 361, 367 (4th Cir. 2004). Because Ade failed to show 
3

that he is eligible for asylum, he cannot meet the higher 

standard for withholding of removal.

Finally, we find that substantial evidence supports 

the finding that Ade failed to meet the standard for relief 

under the Convention Against Torture. To obtain such relief, an 

applicant must establish that “it is more likely than not that 

he or she would be tortured if removed to the proposed country 

of removal.” 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(2) (2009). We find that Ade

failed to make the requisite showing before the immigration 

court. 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
#### Henrietta Maer (Substituted for Irwin M. Maer, Deceased), Appellant, *v.*National Casualty Company, Respondent.

First Department,

April 22, 1943.

*George Ginsburg*for appellant.

*Oiho 8. Bowling*for respondent.

Callahan, J.

The uncontradicted testimony of the physician who treated the insured showed that after an illness which *4originated on or about April 26, 1941, the latter was permitted to return to his office to do light tasks between August 1 and September 19, 1941, despite the continuance of the disabling disease with which lie was afflicted. This course was followed in order to impress the patient with the idea that he could get well, though he was in fact suffering from an illness believed to be fatal, and which resulted in death shortly after the end of the policy coverage. The course was recommended by the doctor as part of the medical treatment, because of the patient’s depressed mental condition. After trying this course of treatment for a short time the insured suffered a relapse and was compelled to remain at home. No claim was made for disability payments between August 1 and September 19, 1941. This was because the policy only insured against actual loss from disability resulting from sickness during the term of the insurance.

The policy contained a provision that it was to continue in force until terminated by the company. Acting under this clause the defendant company cancelled the policy on or about June 22, 1941.

The policy further provided, however, that cancellation should be without prejudice as to any claim originating prior thereto.

We think that the testimony warranted a finding by the trial court that the insured was at all times after April 26, 1941, and up to the date of death, wholly and continuously disabled by sickness, and prevented from performing any and every duty pertaining to his occupation, within the meaning of the policy, and that he had a valid claim for the number of weeks sued for, which claim originated prior to cancellation.

Plaintiff’s waiver of the payments during the period when he attended his office, as part of his medical treatment, did not alter the continuing nature of the original disability.

The determination of the Appellate Term should be reversed, with costs to the plaintiff in this court and in the Appellate Term, and the judgment of the Municipal Court affirmed.

Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ., concur; Martin, P. J., dissents and votes to affirm.

Determination of the Appellate Term reversed, with costs to the plaintiff in this court and in the Appellate Term, and the judgment of the Municipal Court affirmed.
# Were you affected by the disaster?
**Insert Program Logo Here**

We provide . . . 

· Information

· Education

· Emotional support

· Links to resources

Are you interested in talking with someone?

Attend a short presentation on. . .

· Recognizing common reactions to disasters

· Building coping skills for the recovery process

· Managing disaster-related stress

· Identifying and meeting children’s needs

We are . . . 

· Confidential

· Anonymous

· Free

We will come to your. . .

· Home

· School

· Meetings

· Workplace

· Place of worship

· Club

· Events
**Contact Us!**

**Insert Program Phone Number Here**

We are here for YOU.

# image1.png
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 860 

To amend the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 to modify 

the terms of the Jackson Gulch rehabilitation project in Colorado, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 25, 2019 

Mr. GARDNER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 

2009 to modify the terms of the Jackson Gulch rehabilitation project in Colorado, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Jackson Gulch Reha5 bilitation Project Modification Act’’. 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 860 IS

1 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF JACKSON GULCH REHABILITA2 TION PROJECT, COLORADO. 

3 Section 9105(b) of the Omnibus Public Land Man4 agement Act of 2009 (Public Law 111–11; 123 Stat. 

5 1303) is amended— 

6 (1) in paragraph (1)— 

7 (A) by striking ‘‘requirement’’ and insert8 ing ‘‘and cost-sharing requirements’’; and 

9 (B) by inserting ‘‘, which shall be not more 

10 than 65 percent of that total cost’’ before the 

11 period at the end; 

12 (2) in paragraph (3)— 

13 (A) in the paragraph heading, by striking 

14 ‘‘REQUIREMENT’’ and inserting ‘‘AND COST15 SHARING REQUIREMENTS’’; 

16 (B) in subparagraph (A), in the matter 

17 preceding clause (i), by striking ‘‘The Secretary 

18 shall recover from the District as reimbursable 

19 expenses’’ and inserting ‘‘Subject to subpara20 graph (C), the District shall be liable under this 

21 subsection for an amount equal to’’; 

22 (C) in subparagraph (B)— 

23 (i) in the matter preceding clause (i), 

24 by striking ‘‘Secretary shall recover reim25 bursable expenses’’ and inserting ‘‘District 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 860 IS

1 shall pay the Project costs for which the 

2 District is liable’’; and 

3 (ii) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘15’’ 

4 and inserting ‘‘not more than 40’’; and 

5 (D) by striking subparagraph (C) and in6 serting the following: 

7 ‘‘(C) CREDIT.—In determining the exact 

8 amount for which the District is liable under 

9 this paragraph, the Secretary shall— 

10 ‘‘(i) review and approve all final costs 

11 associated with the completion of the 

12 Project; and 

13 ‘‘(ii) credit the district for all amounts 

14 paid by the District for engineering work 

15 and improvements directly associated with 

16 the Project, whether before, on, or after 

17 the date of enactment of this Act.’’; and 

18 (3) in paragraph (7), by striking ‘‘$8,250,000.’’ 

19 and inserting the following: ‘‘the lesser of— 

20 ‘‘(A) not more than 65 percent of the total 

21 cost of carrying out the Project; and 

22 ‘‘(B) $5,350,000.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32
Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Certification

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18U.S.C., SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         Each of the undersigned hereby certifies,  in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 (as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002),  in his capacity as an officer of Senior  Optician  Service,  Inc.,  (the
"Company"),  that, to his knowledge,  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the
Company for the period ended  September 30, 2006 (the  "Report")  fully complies
with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
of 1934 and that  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the  registrant and will be retained by it and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated: November 20, 2006

                                                          /s/ Patrick Downey
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Patrick Downey
                                                         CEO/CFO
Editorial Note on Part 0
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 0 appear at 73 FR 73 FR 54947, Sept. 24, 2008.

§ 0.35 General functions; delegation of authority. Under the general supervision of the Attorney General and the direction of the Deputy Attorney General, the following-described matters are assigned to, and shall be conducted, handled or supervised by, the Pardon Attorney but subject to the limitation contained in § 0.36 of this chapter. ( a ) Exercise of the powers and performance of the functions vested in the Attorney General by §§ 1.1 through 1.8 inclusive of this chapter.
( b ) Performance of such other duties as may be assigned by the Attorney General or the Deputy Attorney General.
[Order No. 1012-83, 48 FR 22290, May 18, 1983, as amended by AG Order No. 3464-2014, 79 FR 54188, Sept. 11, 2014]
§ 430.11 Advance notice of exploratory drilling. The Commission encourages consultation with any project sponsor who is considering development of a new or expanded ground water withdrawal that is being planned for any purpose when the daily average withdrawal during any calendar month exceeds 10,000 gallons to insure proper implementation of this regulation and to reduce the possibility of investment in new ground water development facilities which may not be approved hereunder. Such consultation should occur early in the planning stage of a new project and prior to initiation of exploratory drilling. ( a ) Any person, firm corporation or other entity planning a new or expanded ground water withdrawal that may be operated at a daily average withdrawal during any calendar month in excess of 10,000 gallons shall notify the Executive Director not less than 30 days prior to initiation of exploratory drilling. Such notice shall be in writing and shall specify the location of proposed new facility, the anticipated rate of withdrawal, and the general purpose of the proposed water use. The notice shall also state the location of existing wells within the radius set forth in § 430.21(a).
( b ) Whenever the Executive Director shall deem necessary, or upon request of a party proposing a new or expanded withdrawal of ground water, an informal conference may be scheduled to review the nature of the proposed withdrawal, the applicability of the Commission's standards relating to ground water, and the requirements of a protected area permit under this regulation.
Exhibit 32.a



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P. Manning, Principal Executive Officer of the general partner of the general partner of the Partnership's general partner, C&M Management Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)-15 or 15(d)-15 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                         
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                         
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



|                |  |                            
|--------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date:           |  |                            
|August 19, 2008 |  | /s/ John P. Manning        
|                |  |                            
|                |  | John P. Manning            
|                |  | Principal Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 10.36








THIRD AMENDMENT TO FOURTH AMENDED

 AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


This Third Amendment (this "Amendment") is entered into as of March 8, 2016, between CytRx Corporation, a Delaware corporation ("Employer"), and Steven Kriegsman ("Employee") in order to amend as follows that certain Fourth Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, effective as of May 10, 2012, as amended by the First Amendment thereto dated as of March 4, 2014 and the Second Amendment thereto dated as of January 1, 2015 (as so amended, the "Employment Agreement"), between Employer and Employee.


1.            Stock Options.  Section 6.3 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended by removing therefrom the first sentence and substituting the following:


"Employer and Employee shall enter into mutually satisfactory amendments to all stock option agreements between Employer and Employee pursuant to Employer's 2008 Stock Incentive Plan to provide for the vesting, in full, of stock options subject to each such stock option agreement in the event of, and upon, FDA approval to market aldoxorubicin.  Employee also shall be eligible for grants of stock options, restricted stock and other equity awards based on Employer stock in accordance with Employer's practices and policies with respect to its senior executives."


2.            Survival.  Section 20 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to add the following sentence at the end of current Section 20:


"For the avoidance of doubt and without limiting the foregoing, in the event of Employee's termination of employment by Employer other than for Cause or Employee's voluntary termination of employment with the Company for Good Reason, in either case following the expiration of the Term (including without limitation an expiration of the Term arising from the issuance of either party of non-renewal of this Agreement under Section 5), Employee shall be eligible for the severance benefits set forth in Sections 7.2, 7.3 and 7.5."


3.            No Other Changes to the Employment Agreement.  Except as expressly amended by this Amendment, all of the terms of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have entered into this Amendment as of the date first set forth above.



	 EMPLOYER:	 	 	 EMPLOYEE:	 
	 CYTRX CORPORATION	 	 	 	 
	
/s/ JOHN Y. CALOZ

	 	 	
/s/ STEVEN A. KRIEGSMAN

	 
	
John Y. Caloz

	 	 	
Steven A. Kriegsman

	 
	
Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          22,675
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   74,208
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,575
<INVENTORY>                                    155,800
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               262,258
<PP&E>                                         302,624
<DEPRECIATION>                                 137,828
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 636,995
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          103,121
<BONDS>                                        273,922
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          2
<COMMON>                                           197
<OTHER-SE>                                     101,272
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   636,995
<SALES>                                        802,632
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               802,632
<CGS>                                          712,666
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  712,666
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                64,890
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,353
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,277)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (373)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (904)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (904)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)
        

</TABLE>