alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 705.7 Conduct of investigations. ( a ) *Periodic compliance reviews.* The responsible agency official shall from time to time review the practices of recipients to determine whether they are complying with this part.
( b ) *Complaints.* Any person who believes himself or any specific class of individuals to be subjected to discrimination prohibited by this part may by himself or by a representative file with the responsible agency official a written complaint. A complaint must be filed not later than 180 days from the date of the alleged discrimination, unless the time for filing is extended by the responsible agency official.
( c ) *Investigations.* The responsible agency official will make a prompt investigation whenever a compliance review, report, complaint, or any other information indicates a possible failure to comply with this part. The investigation should include, whenever appropriate, a review of the pertinent practices and policies of the recipient, the circumstances under which the possible noncompliance with this part occurred, and other factors relevant to a determination as to whether the recipient has failed to comply with this part.
( d ) *Resolution of matters.* ( 1 ) If an investigation pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section indicates a failure to comply with this part, the responsible agency official will so inform the recipient and the matter will be resolved by informal means whenever possible. If it has been determined that the matter cannot be resolved by informal means, action will be taken as provided for in § 705.8.
( 2 ) If an investigation does not warrant action pursuant to subparagraph (1) of this paragraph, the responsible agency official will so inform the recipient and the complainant, if any, in writing.
( e ) *Intimidatory or retaliatory acts prohibited.* No recipient or other person shall intimidate, threaten, coerce, or discriminate against any individual for the purpose of interfering with any right or privilege secured by section 601 of the Act or this part, or because he has made a complaint, testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing under this part. The identity of complainants shall be kept confidential except to the extent necessary to carry out the purpose of this part, including the conduct of any investigation, hearing, or judicial proceeding arising thereunder.
/**
 * @class
 * @augments H5P.EventDispatcher
 * @param {Object} displayOptions
 * @param {boolean} displayOptions.export Triggers the display of the 'Download' button
 * @param {boolean} displayOptions.copyright Triggers the display of the 'Copyright' button
 * @param {boolean} displayOptions.embed Triggers the display of the 'Embed' button
 * @param {boolean} displayOptions.icon Triggers the display of the 'H5P icon' link
 */
H5P.ActionBar = (function ($, EventDispatcher) {
  "use strict";

  function ActionBar(displayOptions) {
    EventDispatcher.call(this);

    /** @alias H5P.ActionBar# */
    var self = this;

    var hasActions = false;

    // Create action bar
    var $actions = H5P.jQuery('<ul class="h5p-actions"></ul>');

    /**
     * Helper for creating action bar buttons.
     *
     * @private
     * @param {string} type
     * @param {string} customClass Instead of type class
     */
    var addActionButton = function (type, customClass) {
      /**
       * Handles selection of action
       */
      var handler = function () {
        self.trigger(type);
      };
      H5P.jQuery('<li/>', {
        'class': 'h5p-button h5p-noselect h5p-' + (customClass ? customClass : type),
        role: 'button',
        tabindex: 0,
        title: H5P.t(type + 'Description'),
        html: H5P.t(type),
        on: {
          click: handler,
          keypress: function (e) {
            if (e.which === 32) {
              handler();
              e.preventDefault(); // (since return false will block other inputs)
            }
          }
        },
        appendTo: $actions
      });

      hasActions = true;
    };

    // Register action bar buttons
    if (displayOptions.export || displayOptions.copy) {
      // Add export button
      addActionButton('reuse', 'export');
    }
    if (displayOptions.copyright) {
      addActionButton('copyrights');
    }
    if (displayOptions.embed) {
      addActionButton('embed');
    }
    if (displayOptions.icon) {
      // Add about H5P button icon
      H5P.jQuery('<li><a class="h5p-link" href="http://h5p.org" target="_blank" title="' + H5P.t('h5pDescription') + '"></a></li>').appendTo($actions);
      hasActions = true;
    }

    /**
     * Returns a reference to the dom element
     *
     * @return {H5P.jQuery}
     */
    self.getDOMElement = function () {
      return $actions;
    };

    /**
     * Does the actionbar contain actions?
     *
     * @return {Boolean}
     */
    self.hasActions = function () {
      return hasActions;
    };
  }

  ActionBar.prototype = Object.create(EventDispatcher.prototype);
  ActionBar.prototype.constructor = ActionBar;

  return ActionBar;

})(H5P.jQuery, H5P.EventDispatcher);
### SUBCHAPTER VI—STATE TECHNICAL COMMITTEES
### SUBCHAPTER LVII—BOSTON NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK
<PAGE>

                   AMERICAN ABSORBENTS NATURAL PRODUCTS, INC.


      EXHIBIT 11 - STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (LOSS)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                    From Inception
                                                                                    on February 9,
                                                                                     1984 Through
                                       For the Years Ended January 31,                January 31,
Primary:                               2001                      2000                    2001
                                       ----                      ----                    ----
<S>                                <C>                        <C>                   <C>
Average Shares Outstanding          5,911,366                  5,748,521                 N/A

Net Loss                           $ (907,111)                $ (958,341)           $ (5,491,279)

Earnings (Loss) Per Share            $ (0.15)                  $ (0.17)                  N/A
</TABLE>










                                      49
#### Delkin *v.*McDuffie.

May 11, 1910.

Specific performance. Before Judge Ellis. Fulton superior court.

June *29,*1909.

*R. B. Blackburn*and *Westmoreland Brothers,*for plaintiff in error. *Moore & Pomeroy,*contra.

Evans, P. J.

1. A, having an equity of redemption in two tracts of land, agreed with B that the latter should pay the amount claimed by the holder of the title and take a deed to both tracts, the title to one of which should be retained by B in consideration of the money expended by him, and the other tract should be conveyed by him to A. The contract was performed to the extent of B’s paying the amount due to redeem the land and taking from the creditor of A a deed to both tracts. B refused to comply with his agreement to convey one of the tracts to A. *Held,*that the title to the tract agreed by B to be conveyed to A was affected with a trust in favor of A, which equity will enforce by proper decree. *Horne*v. *Mullis,*119 *Ga.*534 (46 S. E. 663).

2. Where the plaintiff and defendant in an action like that described in the preceding note sustain the relation of nephew and uncle, and it is alleged that the nephew reposed confidence in the uncle, who wielded great influence over him, and the nephew made the contract with his uncle because of his trust in him, and there is no change in the character of the possession of the land or in the relation of the parties with respect thereto, a failure of the nephew to sue the uncle until five years had elapsed is not such laches as will bar his equitable remedy.

3. By pleading to the merits of an action in a court having jurisdiction of the subject-matter, a non-resident defendant submits himself to the jurisdiction of the court.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Geraldo Chavez, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 695]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Kahn, J.), rendered September 9, 2005, convicting him of attempted criminal mischief in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631 [1976]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Schmidt, J.P., Rivera, Skelos and Lunn, JJ., concur.
----

| Delaware                                                          |   | 000-23143               |   | 13-3379479                       |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|----------------------------------|
| (State or other jurisdictionof incorporation)                     |   | (CommissionFile Number) |   | (IRS EmployerIdentification No.) |
|                                                              |   |                    |   |                             |
| 777 Old Saw Mill River Road, Tarrytown, New York                  |   | 10591                   |
| (Address of principal executive offices)                          |   | (Zip Code)              |
| Registrant's telephone number, including area code (914) 789-2800 |
| o | Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
|---|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| o | Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
|---|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| o | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
|---|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| o | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |
|---|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

| Item 8.01. | Other Events. |
|------------|---------------|
| Item 9.01. | Financial Statements and Exhibits. |
|------------|------------------------------------|
| (d)   | Exhibits |
|-----------------|----------|
| Exhibit No. | Description |
|-------------|-------------|
| 99.1 | Press Release issued June 11, 2013. |
|------|-------------------------------------|

----

|   | PROGENICS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. |
|--------|---------------------------------|
|   | By:                             | /s/ ANGELO W. LOVALLO, JR. |
|   |                            | Angelo W. Lovallo, Jr. |
|   |                            | Vice President, Finance & Treasurer |
|   |                            | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly report of GoAmerica, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Donald G. Barnhart, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates
presented and consolidated results of operations of the Company for the periods
presented.

Dated: November 12, 2004

                                                        /s/ Donald G. Barnhart
                                                        -----------------------
                                                        Donald G. Barnhart
                                                        Chief Financial Officer

This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
### SUBCHAPTER LIX–R—SALT RIVER BAY NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK AND ECOLOGICAL PRESERVE AT ST. CROIX, VIRGIN ISLANDS
HOW ARE WE DOING?

Your opinion is important to us!

In [month], we will be distributing a package containing a survey to crisis counselors (outreach workers) and team leaders to get your feedback about [name of your Project]. This survey will help us to understand, from your point of view, how well our project is meeting the needs of staff and the community.

The survey is anonymous and will take only a few minutes of your time. It is voluntary, but we encourage you to participate so we can learn how to improve the program and the services we provide. 

Again, your opinions and experiences as a staff member of [name of Project] are important. We appreciate the time you take to complete this survey.

Thank you!
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 692 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the excise tax 

on medical devices. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 7, 2019 

Mr. TOOMEY (for himself, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. ALEXANDER, Mr. 

BLUMENTHAL, Mr. CASEY, Mr. CRAPO, Ms. DUCKWORTH, Mr. GRASSLEY, Ms. HASSAN, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. JONES, Ms. 

MCSALLY, Mr. PORTMAN, Ms. ROSEN, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Ms. SINEMA, Ms. 

SMITH, Mr. TILLIS, Mr. YOUNG, Mr. WICKER, Mr. RUBIO, Mrs. HYDESMITH, Mrs. FISCHER, Mr. GARDNER, and Mr. BLUNT) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal 

the excise tax on medical devices. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protect Medical Inno5 vation Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 692 IS

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF MEDICAL DEVICE EXCISE TAX. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 32 of the Internal Rev3 enue Code of 1986 is amended by striking subchapter E. 

4 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

5 (1) Subsection (a) of section 4221 of such Code 

6 is amended by striking the last sentence. 

7 (2) Paragraph (2) of section 6416(b) of such 

8 Code is amended by striking the last sentence. 

9 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sub10 chapters for chapter 32 of such Code is amended by strik11 ing the item relating to subchapter E. 

12 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

13 this section shall apply to sales after December 31, 2019. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF THE SHAW GROUP INC. PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of The Shaw Group Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K/A (Amendment 1) for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert
L. Belk, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. July 11 2005/s/ Robert L. Belk
Robert L. Belk
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<MULTIPLIER>  1
       
<S>                             <C>       
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1998                     
<CASH>                          11,719
<SECURITIES>                    0         
<RECEIVABLES>                   1,012,440      
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     11,220      
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1,532,740      
<PP&E>                          71,915           
<DEPRECIATION>                  (35,009)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,960,641     
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           331,972
<BONDS>                         0            
<COMMON>                        215,000       
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0   
<OTHER-SE>                      911,391  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1,960,641
<SALES>                         1,026,672           
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                1,026,672
<CGS>                           194,781     
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   85,738   
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                746,153
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              (97)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 730,089         
<INCOME-TAX>                    0             
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0
<DISCONTINUED>                  0      
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0   
<CHANGES>                       0        
<NET-INCOME>                    730,089          
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   .28      
<EPS-DILUTED>                   .28        

        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Defense Acquisition Regulations System

          - 48 CFR Part 215

# AGENCY:

Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense (DoD).

# ACTION:

Final rule.

# SUMMARY:

DoD is making a technical amendment to the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to add text and a reference to a memorandum from the Director, Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         March 11, 2011.                    

*Applicability Date:*                     All solicitations for competitive, negotiated acquisitions issued after July 1, 2011, are subject to these procedures.                

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Ynette Shelkin, Defense Acquisition Regulations System, OUSD(AT&L)DPAP(DARS), Room 3B855, 3060 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3060. Telephone 703-602-8384; facsimile 703-602-0350.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This final rule amends DFARS by adding a section at 215.300 with a reference to Director, Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy memorandum dated March 4, 2011, Department of Defense Source Selection Procedures. The memorandum provides mandatory requirements for conducting competitively negotiated acquisitions under FAR part 15 and outlines a common set of principles and procedures for conducting such acquisitions.

# List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 215

      - Government procurement

Ynette R. Shelkin,

Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.

Therefore, 48 CFR part 215 is amended as follows:

# PART 215—CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION

1. The authority citation for 48 CFR part 215 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1.

2. Section 215.300 is added to subpart 215.3 to read as follows: 

215.300 

Contracting officers shall follow the principles and procedures in Director, Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy memorandum dated March 4, 2011, Department of Defense Source Selection Procedures, when conducting negotiated, competitive acquisitions utilizing FAR part 15 procedures.

[FR Doc. 2011-5601 Filed 3-10-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-08-P
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Document Search 
-  Press Release Archive 2002-2009 

# Press Release Archive 2002-2009

## About this document and download

This archive is stored as a ZIP file. ZIP files must be unzipped (decompressed) before the file (or files) contained in the ZIP can be used.

  Download  .zip
1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see

2 Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please

3 also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other

4 deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the

5 filing date.

6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

7 CONSUELO ANGELA YSAIS (n/k/a LEYBA), 

8 Petitioner-Appellee, 

9 v. NO. 29,915

10 CHRISTOPHER YSAIS, 

11 Respondent-Appellant.

12 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANDOVAL COUNTY 

13 Matthew G. Reynolds, District Judge

14 Consuelo Angela Ysais

15 Rio Rancho, NM

16 for Appellee

17 Christopher Ysais

18 Rio Rancho, NM

19 for Appellant

20 MEMORANDUM OPINION

21 BUSTAMANTE, Judge.

22 Father, pro se, appeals from the child custody order filed on August 26, 2009,

23 granting sole custody of the child to Mother, and granting visitation rights to Father.
2

1 We proposed to affirm in a calendar notice. Father responded to that notice with a

2 memorandum in opposition. We have carefully reviewed Father’s arguments, but we

3 are not persuaded that affirmance is not the correct disposition in this case. We

4 therefore affirm.

5 Father repeats the claims that were included in his docketing statement. In

6 summary calendar cases, such as this, the party who opposes the proposed disposition

7 set out in the calendar notice has the burden of clearly pointing out errors in fact or

8 law in that proposed disposition. See Hennessy v. Duryea, 1998-NMCA-036, ¶ 24,

9 124 N.M. 754, 955 P.2d 683; see also State v. Ibarra, 116 N.M. 486, 489, 864 P.2d

10 302, 305 (Ct. App. 1993); State v. Sisneros, 98 N.M. 201, 202-03, 647 P.2d 403, 404-

11 05 (1982). Father has not met that burden. Instead, Father repeats the arguments

12 previously made; the arguments that were fully addressed in our calendar notice. 

13 Therefore, for the reasons discussed in our calendar notice, we affirm the

14 district court’s decision. 

15 IT IS SO ORDERED.

16 

17 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge

18 WE CONCUR:

19 

20 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge 
3

1 

2 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge