alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013009EN.01001102.xml

| 12.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 9/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/11

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 November 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf, Germany) — Pfeifer & Langen KG v Hauptzollamt Aachen

(Case C-131/11) (1)

1

(Agriculture - Regulation (EEC) No 1443/82 - Article 3(4) - Application of the quota system in the sugar sector - Surplus quantity of sugar found by the national authorities of a Member State during an a posteriori investigation carried out at the producer’s premises - Whether that surplus is to be taken into account when establishing the final production figures for the marketing year during which the difference came to light)

2013/C 9/16

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Finanzgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Pfeifer & Langen KG

Applicant:

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Aachen

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Finanzgericht Düsseldorf — Interpretation of Article 3(4) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1443/82 of 8 June 1982 laying down detailed rules for the application of the quota system in the sugar sector (OJ 1982 L 158, p. 17) — Surplus quantity of isoglucose found subsequently by the authorities of a Member State during an inspection — Whether it is possible to take that surplus into account when establishing the final production figures for the marketing year during which the surplus came to light

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 3(4) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1443/82 of 8 June 1982 laying down detailed rules for the application of the quota system in the sugar sector, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 392/94 of 23 February 1994, must be interpreted as not being applicable in a situation in which a surplus quantity of sugar has been found by the national authorities in the context of an a posteriori investigation carried out at the producer’s premises if the surplus quantity constitutes C sugar.

---

(1)  OJ C 179, 18.6.2011.

1

---
### SUBCHAPTER V—HEALTHY FORESTS RESERVE PROGRAM
### §5526. Repealed. Pub. L. 114–329, title I, §105(o), Jan. 6, 2017, 130 Stat. 2984

Section, Pub. L. 102–194, title II, §206, Dec. 9, 1991, 105 Stat. 1602, described the role of the Department of Education and authorized appropriations for fiscal years 1992 to 1996.
### SUBCHAPTER LXXV—WHISKEYTOWN-SHASTA-TRINITY NATIONAL RECREATION AREA
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 06-1558

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee,

v.

MANUEL A. VEGA-SANTIAGO,

Defendant, Appellant.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on February 21, 2008, is

amended as follows:

On page 14, lines 16-17: replace "No. 07-1824 (1st Cir.

XXXX) (Torruella, J. dissenting)." with "No. 07-1824, 2008 WL

541642 (1st Cir. Feb. 29, 2008) (Torruella, J., dissenting)."
### §§1181 to 1187. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections were omitted in the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 98–129, §2, Oct. 14, 1983, 97 Stat. 835.

Section 1181, Pub. L. 89–702, title IV, §401, Nov. 2, 1966, 80 Stat. 1097, related to seizure and forfeiture of vessels. See section 1171 of this title.

Section 1182, Pub. L. 89–702, title IV, §402, Nov. 2, 1966, 80 Stat. 1097; Pub. L. 90–578, title IV, §402(b)(2), Oct. 17, 1968, 82 Stat. 1118; 1970 Reorg. Plan No. 4, eff. Oct. 3, 1970, 35 F.R. 15627, 84 Stat. 2090; 1978 Reorg. Plan No. 2 of 1978, §102, eff. Jan. 1, 1979, 43 F.R. 36037, 92 Stat. 3784, set out additional enforcement provisions. See section 1172 of this title.

Section 1183, Pub. L. 89–702, title IV, §403, Nov. 2, 1966, 80 Stat. 1098; 1970 Reorg. Plan No. 4, eff. Oct. 3, 1970, 35 F.R. 15627, 84 Stat. 2090, authorized the Secretary of Commerce to issue regulations. See section 1173 of this title.

Section 1184, Pub. L. 89–702, title IV, §404, Nov. 2, 1966, 80 Stat. 1098, set out penalties for violations. See section 1174 of this title.

Section 1185, Pub. L. 89–702, title IV, §405, Nov. 2, 1966, 80 Stat. 1098; 1970 Reorg. Plan No. 4, eff. Oct. 3, 1970, 35 F.R. 15627, 84 Stat. 2090, related to contracts or agreements for research. See section 1155(b) of this title.

Section 1186, Pub. L. 89–702, title IV, §406, Nov. 2, 1966, 80 Stat. 1098, defined terms as used in this chapter. See section 1151 of this title.

Section 1187, Pub. L. 89–702, title IV, §407, Nov. 2, 1966, 80 Stat. 1098, related to creation of a Pribilof Islands fund. See section 1166 of this title.
### §80a–64. Preventing compliance with subchapter; liability of controlling persons

Notwithstanding the exemption set forth in section 80a–6(f) of this title, section 80a–47 of this title shall apply to a business development company to the same extent as if it were a registered closed-end investment company, except that the provisions of section 80a–47(a) of this title shall not be construed to require any company which is not an investment company within the meaning of section 80a–3(a) of this title to comply with the provisions of this subchapter which are applicable to a business development company solely because such company is a wholly-owned subsidiary of, or directly or indirectly controlled by, a business development company.

(Aug. 22, 1940, ch. 686, title I, §65, as added Pub. L. 96–477, title I, §105, Oct. 21, 1980, 94 Stat. 2289.)
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 90 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 90

 To limit the establishment or extension of national monuments in the 
                             State of Utah.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 10, 2019

  Mr. Lee (for himself and Mr. Romney) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To limit the establishment or extension of national monuments in the 
                             State of Utah.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protect Utah's Rural Economy Act''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OR EXTENSION OF NATIONAL 
              MONUMENTS IN THE STATE OF UTAH.

    Section 320301 of title 54, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
    ``(e) Limitation on the Establishment or Extension of National 
Monuments in the State of Utah.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
this section, the President may not establish or extend a national 
monument in the State of Utah (referred to in this subsection as the 
`State') unless--
            ``(1) the extension or establishment has been authorized by 
        an Act of Congress; and
            ``(2) the President has received from the Governor of the 
        State notice that the State legislature has enacted legislation 
        approving the proposed establishment or extension.''.
                                 <all>
```
### §8511. Public safety priority

In conducting research, the Under Secretary shall prioritize improving weather data, modeling, computing, forecasting, and warnings for the protection of life and property and for the enhancement of the national economy.

(Pub. L. 115–25, title I, §101, Apr. 18, 2017, 131 Stat. 92.)
IC 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 929 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 2, 2019 

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to redefine the 

eastern and middle judicial districts of North Carolina. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

S 929 RFH

1 SECTION 1. JUDICIAL DISTRICTS OF NORTH CAROLINA. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 113 of title 28, United 

3 States Code, is amended— 

4 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘and Wilson 

5 and’’ and inserting ‘‘Wilson, those portions of Hoke, 

6 Moore, Scotland, and Richmond counties encom7 passing the Fort Bragg Military Reservation and 

8 Camp Mackall, and’’; and 

9 (2) by striking subsection (b) and inserting the 

10 following: 

11 ‘‘(b) MIDDLE DISTRICT.—The Middle District com12 prises the counties of Alamance, Cabarrus, Caswell, Chat13 ham, Davidson, Davie, Durham (excluding that portion of 

14 Durham County encompassing the Federal Correctional 

15 Institution, Butner, North Carolina), Forsyth, Guilford, 

16 Hoke (excluding that portion of Hoke County encom17 passing the Fort Bragg Military Reservation and Camp 

18 Mackall), Lee, Montgomery, Moore (excluding that por19 tion of Moore County encompassing the Fort Bragg Mili20 tary Reservation and Camp Mackall), Orange, Person, 

21 Randolph, Richmond (excluding that portion of Richmond 

22 County encompassing the Fort Bragg Military Reserva23 tion and Camp Mackall), Rockingham, Rowan, Scotland 

24 (excluding that portion of Scotland County encompassing 

25 the Fort Bragg Military Reservation and Camp Mackall), 

26 Stanly, Stokes, Surry, and Yadkin.’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

S 929 RFH

1 (b) APPLICATION.—The amendments made by sub2 section (a) shall not apply to any action commenced or 

3 pending in any judicial district of North Carolina before 

4 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Passed the Senate July 30, 2019. 

Attest: JULIE E. ADAMS, 

Secretary. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
### **CHAPTER 25B—REEFS FOR MARINE LIFE CONSERVATION**

Sec.
1220.
State applications for obsolete ships for use as offshore reefs.
1220a.
Transfer of title; terms and conditions.
1220b.
Obsolete ships available; number; equitable administration.
1220c.
Denial of applications; finality of decision.
1220c–1.
Financial assistance to State to prepare transferred ship.
1220d.
"Obsolete ship" defined.
### SUBCHAPTER IV—TRANSPORTATION AND UTILITY SYSTEMS IN AND ACROSS, AND ACCESS INTO, CONSERVATION SYSTEM UNITS
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Funding Programs 
-  Grants 
-  State Trade Expansion Program (STEP) 
-  Directory of STEP Awardees 

## Section navigation

-  Loans 
-  Investment capital 
-  Disaster assistance 
-  Surety bonds 
-  Grants    -  State Trade Expansion Program (STEP)      -  Directory of STEP awardees 
  -  Grants for community organizations 

# Directory of STEP awardees

## Find your next global customer

**The State Trade Expansion Program (STEP) grants are specifically for established U.S. small businesses seeking to complete one of the following eligible activities:**
                  - Participate in trade missions.
                  - Subscribe to services provided by US Department of Commerce
                  - Translation fees
                  - Design of market media
                  - Tradeshow exhibitions
                  - Participate in export training workshops
                  - Reverse trade missions
                  - Procurement of consultancy services
                  - Other export initiatives as approved by Associate Administrator at SBA

If you are an established company, please contact your appropriate state/territory representative below to learn more about how to apply for STEP funds.
GLOBAL MARINE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                           as of January 31, 1999


                                         STATE OR OTHER     PERCENT OF VOTING
                                         JURISDICTION OF    STOCK OWNED BY
NAME OF COMPANY                          INCORPORATION      IMMEDIATE PARENT

Global Marine Inc.                       Delaware                   -
  Applied Drilling Technology Inc.       Texas                     100%
  Arctic Systems Ltd.                    Canada                    100%
  Campeche Drilling Services Inc.        Delaware                  100%
  Challenger Minerals Inc.               California                100%
  Global Marine Arctic Ltd.              Canada                    100%
  Global Marine Drilling Company         California                100%
    Global Marine Caribbean, Inc.        California                100%
    Global Marine Development Inc.       California                100%
    Global Marine do Brasil 
      Perfuracoes Ltda.                  Brazil                     50% (1)
    Global Marine Leasing Corporation    Bahamas                   100%
      Global Marine C. R. Luigs 
        Limited                          England                   100%
  Global Marine Baltic Inc.              Delaware                  100%
    Global Marine International 
      Drilling Corporation               Bahamas                   85.1% (2)
      Global Marine B.V.                 The Netherlands           100%
        Global Marine Norway AS          Norway                    100%
        Glomar International (Canada)    Nova Scotia               100%
           Drilling Company
      Global Marine North Sea Limited    Bahamas                   100%
      Global Marine Overseas Limited     Bahamas                   100%
        Global Marine West Africa        Bahamas                   100%
          Drilling Company Limited
      Global Marine South America LLC    Delaware                  100%
      Global Marine U.K. Limited         Scotland                  100%
      Global Offshore Drilling Limited   Nigeria                    60%
      Glomar International S.A.R.L.      France                    100%
  Global Marine Capital 
    Investments Inc.                     Delaware                  100%
    Global Marine Beaufort Sea Inc.      Delaware                  100%
  Global Marine Corporate Services Inc.  California                100%
  Global Marine de Venezuela Inc.        Delaware                  100%
  Global Marine Drilling 
    (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.                 Malaysia                  100%
  Global Marine Integrated Services -
    International Inc.                   Delaware                  100%
  Intermarine Services Inc.              Texas                     100%
  Marican Offshore Drilling 
    Services, Inc.                       Canada                    100%
  Turnkey Ventures de Mexico Inc.        Delaware                  100%

___________________________

(1) The remaining 50% of the voting stock is owned directly by Global Marine 
    Inc.
(2) The remaining 14.9% of the voting stock is owned by Global Marine Drilling
    Company.
§ 590.128 Holiday inspection service. ( a ) When an official plant requires inspection service on a holiday or a day designated in lieu of a holiday, such service is considered holiday work. The official plant must, in advance of such holiday work, request the inspector in charge to furnish inspection service during such period and must pay the Agency for such holiday work at the hourly rate. For each calendar year, FSIS calculates the holiday rate for inspection service, per hour per program employee, using the following formula: The quotient of dividing the Office of Field Operations plus Office of International Affairs inspection program personnel's previous fiscal year's regular direct pay by the previous fiscal year's regular hours, plus the quotient multiplied by the calendar year's percentage of cost of living increase, multiplied by 2, plus the benefits rate, plus the travel and operating rate, plus the overhead rate, plus the allowance for bad debt rate. FSIS will calculate the benefits rate, the travel and operating rate, the overhead rate, and the allowance for bad debt rate using the formulas set forth in § 592.510(b), and the cost of living increases and percentage of inflation factors set forth in § 592.510(c) of this chapter.
( b ) The term “holiday” shall mean the legal public holidays specified by the Congress in paragraph (a) of section 6103, title 5 of the United States Code. Information on legal holidays may be obtained from the supervisor.
[37 FR 6657, Apr. 1, 1972. Redesignated at 42 FR 32514, June 27, 1977, as amended at 46 FR 9, Jan. 2, 1981. Redesignated at 46 FR 63203, Dec. 31, 1981, as amended at 47 FR 46071, Oct. 15, 1982; 59 FR 52637, Oct. 18, 1994; 65 FR 60095, Oct. 10, 2000; 67 FR 3430, Jan. 24, 2002; 68 FR 37957, June 26, 2003; 71 FR 2143, Jan. 13, 2006; 76 FR 20228, Apr. 12, 2011]
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.43

This Note has not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended
(the "Act"), and is not a "restricted security," as that term is defined in Rule
144 under the Act. This Note may not be offered for sale, sold, or otherwise
transferred except pursuant to an effective Registration Statement under the
Act, or pursuant to an exemption from registration under the Act, the
availability of which is to be established to the satisfaction of the Borrower.

                         SUBORDINATED PROMISSORY NOTE

$345,000                                          Date:  December 1, 1999
                                                  Due:   December 29, 2000

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Nutrition For Life International, Inc., a Texas corporation
("NFLI") hereby promises to pay to the order of Allan I. Sirkin ("Sirkin") at
3600 25/th/ Avenue, Gulfport, Mississippi 39501 or such other place of payment
as Sirkin may specify from time to time in writing, in lawful money of the
United States of America, the principal amount of Three Hundred Forty Five
Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($345,000) together with interest at seven percent
(7%) per annum from the date of this Subordinated Promissory Note (the "Note"),
such principal and interest to be paid the earlier to occur of (i) the
refinancing of the Gulfport, Mississippi property loan in the principal amount
of not less than $2,500,000 by BankOne, Texas NA or another financial
institution or (ii) December 29, 2000.

Payments shall be applied first to accrued interest and then to unpaid
principal. Interest shall be computed on the basis of a year consisting of
twelve months of thirty days each. Prepayment may be made without penalty or
premium.

ALL INDEBTEDNESS EVIDENCED BY THIS NOTE IS SUBORDINATED TO OTHER INDEBTEDNESS
PURSUANT TO, AND TO THE EXTENT PROVIDED IN, AND IS OTHERWISE SUBJECT TO THE
TERMS OF, THE INTERCREDITOR AND SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT, DATED NOVEMBER 30, 1999
(THE "SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT"), AS THE SAME MAY BE AMENDED, MODIFIED OR
OTHERWISE SUPPLEMENTED FROM TIME TO TIME, BY AND AMONG NUTRITION FOR LIFE
INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND CERTAIN OF ITS SUBSIDIARIES, AS BORROWERS, GENERAL
ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION, AS SENIOR LENDER, AND THE HOLDERS FROM TIME TO
TIME OF THE OBLIGATIONS ARISING UNDER THE SUBORDINATED DOCUMENTS REFERRED TO IN
THE SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, THIS NOTE.

NFLI waives presentment and demand for payment, notice of dishonor, protest and
notice and protest and any other notice as permitted under the UCC or any
applicable law.

                                NUTRITION FOR LIFE INTERNATIONAL, INC.

                                9101 Jameel
                                Houston, Texas  77040

                                Signature:  ___________________________________
                                Print Name: ___________________________________
                                Title:      ___________________________________
### SUBCHAPTER XIII—PETRIFIED FOREST NATIONAL PARK
### §1285b. Establishment of boundaries for certain component rivers in Alaska; withdrawal of minerals

Notwithstanding any other provision to the contrary in sections 1274 and 1280 of this title, with respect to components of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System in Alaska designated by paragraphs (38) through (50) of section 1274(a) of this title —

(1) the boundary of each such river shall include an average of not more than six hundred and forty acres per mile on both sides of the river. Such boundary shall not include any lands owned by the State or a political subdivision of the State nor shall such boundary extend around any private lands adjoining the river in such manner as to surround or effectively surround such private lands; and

(2) the withdrawal made by paragraph (iii) of section 1280(a) of this title shall apply to the minerals in Federal lands which constitute the bed or bank or are situated within one-half mile of the bank of any river designated a wild river by the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act.

(Pub. L. 90–542, §15, as added Pub. L. 96–487, title VI, §606(a), Dec. 2, 1980, 94 Stat. 2416.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act, referred to in par. (2), is Pub. L. 96–487, Dec. 2, 1980, 94 Stat. 2371. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 3101 of this title and Tables.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

ESTATE OF GLORIA DECKARD, DAVID 

I. GRUNFELD, ADMINISTRATOR AD 

LITEM, T/A BEER HUT, 

 Petitioners 

 v. 

PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL 

BOARD, 

 Respondent 

ACME MARKETS, INC., 

 Intervenor 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 651 MAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court 

 

MALT BEVERAGE DISTRIBUTORS 

ASSOCIATION, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL 

BOARD, 

 Respondent 

WEIS MARKETS, INC., 

 Intervenor 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 850 MAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court 

 

MALT BEVERAGE DISTRIBUTORS 

ASSOCIATION, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

No. 830 MAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court 
 v. 

PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL 

BOARD, 

 Respondent 

NICK, CFM, LLC, 

 Intervenor 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

MECHANICSBURG DISTRIBUTING, INC. 

AND 6485 CARLISLE PIKE 

ASSOCIATES, L.P., 

 Petitioners 

 v. 

PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL 

BOARD, 

 Respondent 

GIANT FOOD STORES, LLC, 

 Intervenor 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 849 MAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court 

 

MALT BEVERAGE DISTRIBUTORS 

ASSOCIATION, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL 

BOARD, 

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 851 MAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court 
WEIS MARKETS, INC., 

 Intervenor 

:

:

:

MALT BEVERAGE DISTRIBUTORS 

ASSOCIATION AND DERR 

ENTERPRISES, INC., 

 Petitioners 

 v. 

PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL 

BOARD, 

 Respondent 

WEIS MARKETS, INC., 

 Intervenor 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 852 MAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court 

 

DUFFER'S BEVERAGE, LLC, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

PENNSYLVANIA LIQUOR CONTROL 

BOARD, 

 Respondent 

WEIS MARKETS, INC., 

 Intervenor 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 853 MAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court 

 

MALT BEVERAGE DISTRIBUTORS 

ASSOCIATION, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 854 MAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 30th day of August 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.