13128 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 47 / Thursday, March 10, 2011 / Notices 

the Denied Person of the ownership, 

possession, or control of any item 

subject to the Regulations that has been 

or will be exported from the United 

States, including financing or other 

support activities related to a 

transaction whereby the Denied Person 

acquires or attempts to acquire such 

ownership, possession or control; 

C. Take any action to acquire from or 

to facilitate the acquisition or attempted 

acquisition from the Denied Person of 

any item subject to the Regulations that 

has been exported from the United 

States; 

D. Obtain from the Denied Person in 

the United States any item subject to the 

Regulations with knowledge or reason 

to know that the item will be, or is 

intended to be, exported from the 

United States; or 

E. Engage in any transaction to service 

any item subject to the Regulations that 

has been or will be exported from the 

United States and which is owned, 

possessed or controlled by the Denied 

Person, or service any item, of whatever 

origin, that is owned, possessed or 

controlled by the Denied Person if such 

service involves the use of any item 

subject to the Regulations that has been 

or will be exported from the United 

States. For purposes of this paragraph, 

servicing means installation, 

maintenance, repair, modification or 

testing. 

Third, that, after notice and 

opportunity for comment as provided in 

Section 766.23 of the Regulations, any 

person, firm, corporation, or business 

organization related to Farrow by 

affiliation, ownership, control, or 

position of responsibility in the conduct 

of trade or related services may also be 

made subject to the provisions of the 

Order. 

Fourth, that this Order does not 

prohibit any export, reexport, or other 

transaction subject to the Regulations 

where the only items involved that are 

subject to the Regulations are the 

foreign-produced direct product of U.S.- 

origin technology. 

Fifth, that, as authorized by Section 

766.18(c) of the Regulations, the second 

year of the two year denial period set 

forth above shall be suspended and 

shall thereafter be waived, provided that 

during the first year of the denial period 

and during the period of suspension, 

Farrow has commited no violation of 

the Act or any regulation, order or 

license issued thereunder. 

Sixth, that the Proposed Charging 

Letter, the Settlement Agreement, and 

this Order shall be made available to the 

public. 

This Order, which constitutes the 

final agency action in this matter, is 

effective immediately. 

Issued this 28th day of February, 2011. 

David W. Mills, 

Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export 

Enforcement. 

[FR Doc. 2011–5447 Filed 3–9–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DT–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–583–837] 

Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, 

Sheet, and Strip (PET Film) From 

Taiwan: Extension of Time Limit for the 

Preliminary Results of the 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 10, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Emily Halle or Gene Calvert, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 6, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–0176 or (202) 482– 

3586, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 31, 2010, the Department 

of Commerce (the Department) initiated 

the administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on PET Film 

from Taiwan covering the period July 1, 

2009, through June 30, 2010. See 

Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews and Deferral of Initiation of 

Administrative Review, 75 FR 53274 

(August 31, 2010). The current deadline 

for the preliminary results of review is 

April 2, 2011. 

Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary 

Results 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), 

the Department shall make a 

preliminary determination in an 

administrative review of an 

antidumping duty order within 245 

days after the last day of the anniversary 

month of the date of publication of the 

order. The Act further provides, 

however, that the Department may 

extend that 245-day period to 365 days 

if it determines it is not practicable to 

complete the review within the 

foregoing time period. 

The Department finds that it is not 

practicable to complete the preliminary 

results of the administrative review of 

PET Film from Taiwan within this time 

limit. Specifically, the Department 

granted an extension until March 2, 

2011 for Shinkong Synthetic Fibers 

Corporation to submit its supplemental 

questionnaire response. We will need 

additional time to review and analyze 

the supplemental questionnaire 

response when it is submitted. 

Therefore, in accordance with section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, the Department 

is extending the time period for 

completion of the preliminary results of 

this review from 245 days to 365 days; 

i.e., from April 2, 2011, until July 31, 

2011. 

However, July 31, 2011 falls on a 

Sunday, and it is the Department’s longstanding practice to issue a 

determination the next business day 

when the statutory deadline falls on a 

weekend, federal holiday, or any other 

day when the Department is closed. See 

Notice of Clarification: Application of 

‘‘Next Business Day’’ Rule for 

Administrative Determination Deadlines 

Pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, As 

Amended, 70 FR 24533 (May 10, 2005). 

Accordingly, the deadline for the 

completion of these preliminary results 

is now no later than August 1, 2011. 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(3)(A) 

and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: March 4, 2011. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2011–5515 Filed 3–9–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–821–819] 

Magnesium Metal From the Russian 

Federation: Revocation of 

Antidumping Duty Order Pursuant to 

Five-Year Sunset Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On March 1, 2010, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) initiated and the 

International Trade Commission (ITC) 

instituted the sunset review of the 

antidumping duty order on magnesium 

metal from the Russian Federation. On 

February 10, 2011, the ITC determined 


jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 47 / Thursday, March 10, 2011 / Notices 13129 

1This second exclusion for magnesium-based 

reagent mixtures is based on the exclusion for 

reagent mixtures in the 2001 investigations of 

magnesium from the People’s Republic of China, 

Israel, and the Russian Federation. See Notice of 

Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair 

Value: Pure Magnesium in Granular Form From the 

People’s Republic of China, 66 FR 49345 

(September 27, 2001), and Notice of Final 

Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: 

Pure Magnesium From Israel, 66 FR 49349 

(September 27, 2001); Notice of Final Determination 

of Sales at Not Less Than Fair Value: Pure 

Magnesium From the Russian Federation, 66 FR 

49347 (September 27, 2001). These mixtures are not 

magnesium alloys, because they are not chemically 

combined in liquid form and cast into the same 

ingot. 

that revocation of this antidumping duty 

order would not be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of material 

injury to an industry in the United 

States within a reasonably foreseeable 

time. Therefore, the Department is 

revoking the antidumping duty order on 

magnesium metal from the Russian 

Federation. 

DATES: Effective Date: April 15, 2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Hermes Pinilla or Minoo Hatten, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office 5, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–3477 or (202) 482– 

1690, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The Department published the 

antidumping duty order on magnesium 

metal from the Russian Federation on 

April 15, 2005. See Notice of 

Antidumping Duty Order: Magnesium 

Metal From the Russian Federation, 70 

FR 19930 (April 15, 2005). Pursuant to 

section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 

as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 

351.218, the Department initiated and 

the ITC instituted the sunset review of 

this order on March 1, 2010. See 

Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) 

Review, 75 FR 9160 (March 1, 2010); 

Magnesium From China and Russia, 75 

FR 9252 (March 1, 2010). As a result of 

its sunset review, the Department found 

that revocation of the antidumping duty 

order would likely lead to a 

continuation or recurrence of dumping 

and, therefore, notified the ITC of the 

magnitude of the margins likely to 

prevail should the order be revoked. See 

Magnesium Metal From the People’s 

Republic of China and the Russian 

Federation: Final Results of the 

Expedited Sunset Reviews of the 

Antidumping Duty Orders, 75 FR 38983 

(July 7, 2010). 

On February 10, 2011, the ITC 

determined pursuant to section 751(c) of 

the Act that revocation of the 

antidumping duty order on magnesium 

metal from the Russian Federation 

would not be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of material 

injury to an industry in the United 

States within a reasonably foreseeable 

time. See Magnesium From China and 

Russia, 76 FR 11813 (March 3, 2011), 

and USITC Publication 4214 (February 

2011), entitled Magnesium from China 

and Russia: Investigation Nos. 731–TA– 

1071–1072 (Review). 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the order 

is magnesium metal (also referred to as 

magnesium), which includes primary 

and secondary pure and alloy 

magnesium metal, regardless of 

chemistry, raw material source, form, 

shape, or size. Magnesium is a metal or 

alloy containing by weight primarily the 

element magnesium. Primary 

magnesium is produced by 

decomposing raw materials into 

magnesium metal. Secondary 

magnesium is produced by recycling 

magnesium-based scrap into magnesium 

metal. The magnesium covered by the 

order includes blends of primary and 

secondary magnesium. 

The subject merchandise includes the 

following pure and alloy magnesium 

metal products made from primary and/ 

or secondary magnesium, including, 

without limitation, magnesium cast into 

ingots, slabs, rounds, billets, and other 

shapes, and magnesium ground, 

chipped, crushed, or machined into 

raspings, granules, turnings, chips, 

powder, briquettes, and other shapes: 

(1) Products that contain at least 99.95 

percent magnesium, by weight 

(generally referred to as ‘‘ultra-pure’’ 

magnesium); (2) products that contain 

less than 99.95 percent but not less than 

99.8 percent magnesium, by weight 

(generally referred to as ‘‘pure’’ 

magnesium); and (3) chemical 

combinations of magnesium and other 

material(s) in which the magnesium 

content is 50 percent or greater, but less 

that 99.8 percent, by weight, whether or 

not conforming to an ‘‘ASTM 

Specification for Magnesium Alloy.’’ 

The scope of the order excludes: (1) 

Magnesium that is in liquid or molten 

form; and (2) mixtures containing 90 

percent or less magnesium in granular 

or powder form by weight and one or 

more of certain non-magnesium 

granular materials to make magnesiumbased reagent mixtures, including lime, 

calcium metal, calcium silicon, calcium 

carbide, calcium carbonate, carbon, slag 

coagulants, fluorspar, nephaline syenite, 

feldspar, alumina (Al203), calcium 

aluminate, soda ash, hydrocarbons, 

graphite, coke, silicon, rare earth 

metals/mischmetal, cryolite, silica/fly 

ash, magnesium oxide, periclase, 

ferroalloys, dolomite lime, and 

colemanite.1

The merchandise subject to the order 

is currently classifiable under items 

8104.11.00, 8104.19.00, 8104.30.00, and 

8104.90.00 of the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). 

Although the HTSUS item numbers are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, the written description of the 

merchandise covered by the order is 

dispositive. 

Revocation 

As a result of the determination by the 

ITC that revocation of this antidumping 

duty order is not likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of material 

injury to an industry in the United 

States within a reasonably foreseeable 

time, the Department is revoking the 

antidumping duty order on magnesium 

metal from the Russian Federation, 

pursuant to section 751(d) of the Act. 

Pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of the Act 

and 19 CFR 351.222(i)(2)(i), the effective 

date of revocation is April 15, 2010 (i.e., 

the fifth anniversary of the date of 

publication in the Federal Register of 

the notice of the antidumping duty 

order). 

Effective Date of Revocation 

Pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(A) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.222(i)(2)(i), the 

Department intends to issue instructions 

to U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 

15 days after publication of this notice, 

to terminate the suspension of 

liquidation of merchandise subject to 

the order which was entered, or 

withdrawn, for consumption on or after 

April 15, 2010, the effective date of 

revocation of the antidumping duty 

order. The Department will complete 

any pending administrative reviews of 

this order and will conduct reviews of 

subject merchandise entered prior to the 

effective date of revocation in response 

to appropriately filed requests for 

review. 

This notice also serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return/destruction or conversion to 

judicial protective order of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). 

Failure to comply is a violation of the 

APO which may be subject to sanctions. 

This revocation pursuant to five-year 

(sunset) review and notice are in 


jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
13130 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 47 / Thursday, March 10, 2011 / Notices 

accordance with sections 751(c) and 

751(d)(2) of the Act and published 

pursuant to section 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: March 4, 2011. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2011–5512 Filed 3–9–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

RIN 0648–XA281 

Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management 

Council; Public Meeting 

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries 

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of a public meeting. 

SUMMARY: The Gulf of Mexico Fishery 

Management Council will convene a 

meeting of the Ad Hoc Reef Fish 

Limited Access Privilege Program 

Advisory Panel. 

DATES: The meeting will convene at 1 

p.m. on Monday, March 28, 2011 and 

conclude by 5 p.m. on Tuesday, March 

29, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at 

the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management 

Council, 2203 North Lois Avenue, Suite 

1100, Tampa, FL 33607; telephone: 

(813) 348–1630. 

Council address: Gulf of Mexico 

Fishery Management Council, 2203 N. 

Lois Avenue, Suite 1100, Tampa, FL 

33607. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. 

Assane Diagne, Economist; Gulf of 

Mexico Fishery Management Council; 

telephone: (813) 348–1630. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Ad 

Hoc Reef Fish Limited Access Privilege 

Program Advisory Panel will meet to 

discuss charter for-hire days-at-sea and 

headboat individual fishing quota pilot 

programs, and, fishing communities in 

fisheries management. 

Copies of the agenda and other related 

materials can be obtained by calling 

(813) 348–1630. 

Although other non-emergency issues 

not on the agenda may come before the 

Advisory Panel for discussion, in 

accordance with the Magnuson-Stevens 

Fishery Conservation and Management 

Act, those issues may not be the subject 

of formal action during this meeting. 

Actions of the Advisory Panel will be 

restricted to those issues specifically 

identified in the agenda and any issues 

arising after publication of this notice 

that require emergency action under 

Section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens 

Fishery Conservation and Management 

Act, provided the public has been 

notified of the Council’s intent to take 

action to address the emergency. 

Special Accommodations 

These meetings are physically 

accessible to people with disabilities. 

Requests for sign language 

interpretation or other auxiliary aids 

should be directed to Trish Kennedy at 

the Council (see ADDRESSES) at least 5 

working days prior to the meeting. 

Dated: March 4, 2011. 

Tracey L. Thompson, 

Acting Director, Office of Sustainable 

Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service. 

[FR Doc. 2011–5433 Filed 3–9–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–22–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

RIN 0648–XA093 

Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to 

Specified Activities; Taking Marine 

Mammals Incidental to Polar Bear 

Captures 

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries 

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice; issuance of an incidental 

harassment authorization. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the 

Marine Mammal Protection Act 

(MMPA) regulations, notification is 

hereby given that NMFS has issued an 

Incidental Harassment Authorization 

(IHA) to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife 

Service (USFWS) to take marine 

mammals, by harassment, incidental to 

a capture-recapture program of polar 

bears in the U.S. Chukchi Sea. 

DATES: Effective March 14, 2011, 

through May 31, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: A copy of the authorization, 

application, and associated 

Environmental Assessment (EA) and 

Finding of No Significant Impact 

(FONSI) may be obtained by writing to 

Michael Payne, Chief, Permits, 

Conservation and Education Division, 

Office of Protected Resources, National 

Marine Fisheries Service, 1315 East 

West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 

20910, telephoning the contact listed 

below (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT), or visiting the Internet at: 

http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/ 

incidental.htm. Documents cited in this 

notice may also be viewed, by 

appointment, during regular business 

hours, at the aforementioned address. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Candace Nachman, Office of Protected 

Resources, NMFS, (301) 713–2289, ext 

156. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the 

MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) direct 

the Secretary of Commerce to allow, 

upon request, the incidental, but not 

intentional, taking of small numbers of 

marine mammals by U.S. citizens who 

engage in a specified activity (other than 

commercial fishing) within a specified 

geographical region if certain findings 

are made and either regulations are 

issued or, if the taking is limited to 

harassment, a notice of a proposed 

authorization is provided to the public 

for review. 

Authorization for incidental takings 

shall be granted if NMFS finds that the 

taking will have a negligible impact on 

the species or stock(s), will not have an 

unmitigable adverse impact on the 

availability of the species or stock(s) for 

subsistence uses (where relevant), and if 

the permissible methods of taking and 

requirements pertaining to the 

mitigation, monitoring and reporting of 

such takings are set forth. NMFS has 

defined ‘‘negligible impact’’ in 50 CFR 

216.103 as ‘‘* * * an impact resulting 

from the specified activity that cannot 

be reasonably expected to, and is not 

reasonably likely to, adversely affect the 

species or stock through effects on 

annual rates of recruitment or survival.’’ 

Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA 

established an expedited process by 

which citizens of the U.S. can apply for 

an authorization to incidentally take 

small numbers of marine mammals by 

harassment. Section 101(a)(5)(D) 

establishes a 45-day time limit for 

NMFS review of an application 

followed by a 30-day public notice and 

comment period on any proposed 

authorizations for the incidental 

harassment of marine mammals. Within 

45 days of the close of the comment 

period, NMFS must either issue or deny 

the authorization. 

Except with respect to certain 

activities not pertinent here, the MMPA 

defines ‘‘harassment’’ as: 

any act of pursuit, torment, or annoyance 

which (i) has the potential to injure a marine 

mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild 

[‘‘Level A harassment’’]; or (ii) has the 

potential to disturb a marine mammal or 

marine mammal stock in the wild by causing 

disruption of behavioral patterns, including, 


jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES