alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
zixi-ex1030_293.htm



Exhibit 10.30

AMENDMENT NO. 1

TO ZIX CORPORATION EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT

This Amendment No. 1 (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of January 18, 2016, between Richard Spurr (the “Optionee”) and Zix Corporation, a Texas corporation (the “Company”). Reference is made to that certain Zix Corporation Employee Stock Option Agreement, effective as of February 21, 2013, between the Optionee and the Company (the “Option Agreement”).

1. Amendments. 

a. Section 3.1 of the Option Agreement is hereby deleted and replaced with the following: 

“3.1 Termination of Continuous Service or Departure of Director Other Than for “Cause”

This Option terminates on the later of (i) one year after Optionee’s Continuous Service terminates due to death, “Disability,” “Resignation,” “Retirement” or termination by the Company other than for “Cause” and (ii) one year after Optionee ceases to be a member of the Board.” 

b. Section 3.2 of the Option Agreement is hereby deleted and replaced with the following:

“3.2 Termination of Continuous Service or Removal of Director for “Cause”

This Option (whether vested or unvested) terminates immediately and automatically (i) upon the Company or any Subsidiary terminating the Continuous Service of Optionee for “Cause” or (ii) if Optionee is removed from the Board for “Cause”.” 

2. Governing Law. This Amendment is governed by and will be construed, interpreted and enforced in accordance with, the laws of the State of Texas (excluding its conflict of law rules) and applicable federal law.

3. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, all of which shall constitute one and the same agreement, and any party hereto may execute this Amendment by signing and delivering one or more counterparts. Delivery of an executed counterpart of this Amendment electronically or by facsimile shall be effective as delivery of an original executed counterpart of this Amendment.

4. No Other Changes. Other than as provided in this Amendment, the Option Agreement is and shall remain in full force and effect.

[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment on the dates set forth below, to be effective as of the latest date set forth below.

 


	
ZIX CORPORATION

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
By:
	
 
	
/s/ Justin Ferguson

	
 
	
 
	
Justin Ferguson,

	
 
	
 
	
Vice President and General Counsel

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Date:
	
 
	
January 18, 2016




 


	
/s/ Richard Spurr

	
Richard Spurr

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Date:
	
 
	
1/18/2016
Exhibit 13.1


               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of TELEFONICA DE ARGENTINA S.A. (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, as filed
with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Mario Eduardo Vazquez, Chairman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



By: /s/ Mario Eduardo Vazquez
   -------------------------------------------------
Name:  Mario Eduardo Vazquez
Title: Chairman


     Date: April 6, 2005
### **CHAPTER 5—PROTECTION OF FUR SEALS AND OTHER FUR-BEARING ANIMALS**

Sec.
631 to 654. Omitted or Repealed.
655.
Agents to be disinterested.
656.
Agents; administering oaths and taking testimony.
657, 658.
Repealed.
659.
Sea lions; acts prohibiting killing repealed.
#### § 4.12 Service of report.

A copy of such report will be served upon said licensee, and copies will also be sent to the State public service commission, or if the State has no regulatory agency, to the Governor of the State where such project is located. The report will be made available for public inspection at the time of service upon the licensee.

(Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 551-557 (1976); Federal Power Act, as amended, 16 U.S.C. 291-628 (1976 & Supp. V 1981), Dept. of Energy Organization Act 42 U.S.C. 7101-7352 (Supp. V 1981); E.O. 12009, 3 CFR 142 (1978))

[Order 141, 12 FR 8485, Dec. 19, 1947, as amended by Order 344, 48 FR 49010, Oct. 24, 1983; Order 737, 75 FR 43402, July 26, 2010]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                           2,119
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,661
<ALLOWANCES>                                       206
<INVENTORY>                                      2,415
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,043
<PP&E>                                           6,727
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,797
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,177
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,136
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           762
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,902
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,177
<SALES>                                         19,068
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,068
<CGS>                                            5,537
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,207
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    15
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 180
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,866
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,893
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,973
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,973
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     5.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
2 

MEM • 

("When a defendant pleads guilty pursuant to a plea agreement containing 

a sentencing recommendation, and the district court accepts the proffered 

guilty plea, the district court retains wide discretion in imposing 

sentence." (footnote omitted)); see also Sandy v. Fifth Judicial Dist. Court, 

113 Nev. 435, 440 & n.1, 935 P.2d 1148, 1151 & n.1 (1997) (noting that 

"plea agreements may not invade the traditionally judicial function of 

what penalty to impose" and, therefore, trial judge may reject sentence 

bargains that purport to guarantee defendants certain sentence (citation 

omitted)). 

Second, Jefferson argues that the district court abused its 

discretion in rejecting the plea agreement by not following the sentence 

recommendation in the agreement. He further contends that the district 

court should have set forth its reasoning for rejecting the plea agreement. 

Lastly, he asserts that the district court should have given him an 

opportunity to withdraw the guilty plea when it rejected the recommended 

sentence. We disagree. Jefferson conflates a rejection of the plea 

agreement—the district court's refusal to accept a defendant's guilty plea 

entered pursuant to an agreement, see, e.g., Sparks v. State, 104 Nev. 316, 

322-24, 759 P.2d 180, 184-85 (1988)—with a rejection of the sentencing 

recommendation made in the plea agreement. Although the district court 

did not follow the parties' sentencing recommendation, it did not reject the 

plea agreement; the district court accepted Jefferson's guilty plea made 

pursuant to the plea agreement. The language of the guilty plea 

agreement did not bind the court to impose the recommended sentence nor 

did it condition Jefferson's plea on the district court's imposition of the 

recommended sentence. It specifically stated that the court was not 

obligated to accept the parties' sentencing recommendation. Jefferson's 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

MEM 
J. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

ffl 

3 

reliance on Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 for the proposition that 

a defendant must be afforded an opportunity to withdraw his plea if the 

district court does not follow the sentencing recommendation is misplaced 

because the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure do not apply in Nevada's 

state courts. See FRCP 1(a)(1). Moreover, Nevada's legislature 

specifically rejected this proposition by repealing the statute that allowed 

this procedure, see 1993 Nev. Stat., ch. 279, § 1, at 828-29, and we decline 

Jefferson's invitation to hold that a defendant must be allowed to 

withdraw his plea if the district court declines to follow the parties' 

sentencing recommendation. 

Having considered Jefferson's contentions and concluded that 

they lack merit, we 

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED. 

f`--14AA ..eg.0641 , J. 

Hardesty 

Parraguirre V 

ck. 

Cherry 

cc: Hon. Kathleen E. Delaney, District Judge 

Hon. Adriana Escobar, District Judge 

Nguyen & Lay 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk
#### In the Matter of James Owens, Petitioner, v Arnold Lim, as Judge of the Kings County Family Court, Respondent.

[823 NYS2d 677]

Proceeding pursuant to CFLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondent Arnold Lim, a Judge of the Family Court, Kings County, to decide a motion for “Modification of Flacement and to Vacate a Jurisdictional Defective Order,” in a proceeding in that court entitled *Matter of Jessica K.,*pending under docket No. NN-20366/04, and application by the petitioner for poor person relief.

*591Ordered that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

This Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction *(see*CPLR 7804 [b]; 506 [b]) to entertain this proceeding. Crane, J.R, Ritter, Rivera and Lunn, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7971
JAMES ROBERT STANTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusSTANLEY R. WITKOWSKI, Warden, Perry Correctional Institution; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CA-95-2061-19BD) Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: May 31, 1996 Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Robert Stanton, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) motion. Appellant's case was referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1988). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advisedAppellant that the failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Appellant failed to object to the magistrate judge's recommendation. The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge's recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned that failure to object will waive appellate review. See Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); United States v. Schronce , 727 F.2d 91, 93-94 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 467 U.S. 1208 (1984); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Appellant has waived appellate review by failing to file objections afterreceiving proper notice. We accordingly deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
###### Editorial Note on Part 0

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 0 appear at 73 FR 73 FR 54947, Sept. 24, 2008.

#### § 0.121 Applicability of existing departmental regulations.

Unless superseded by regulations promulgated by the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, Departmental regulations set forth in part 18 of this title, applicable to grant programs administered through the Office of Justice Programs, shall apply with equal force and effect to grant programs administered by the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, with references to the Office of Justice Programs and its components in such regulations deemed to refer to the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, as appropriate.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          28,187
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,393
<ALLOWANCES>                                       500
<INVENTORY>                                     21,208
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                66,815
<PP&E>                                          35,733
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,654
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  90,025
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,020
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        39,233
<OTHER-SE>                                      39,158
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    90,025
<SALES>                                        149,515
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               149,515
<CGS>                                          120,982
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  120,982
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,757
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,751
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,875
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,876
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,876
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.22
        

</TABLE>
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  SBA District Offices 
-  Delaware 
-  Doing Business In The Delaware District 

# Doing business in the Delaware District

## Business requirements

SBA’s Business Guide lists the requirements needed to start, grow, and expand your business. Since laws and taxes vary by state, here’s what you need to do before starting your business in our area.

### Business name and registration

Register your business name with the county clerk where your business is located. If you are a corporation, you will also need to register with the Secretary of State.

### Business licensing and zoning

Licenses are typically administered by a variety of state and local departments. It is important to consider zoning regulations when choosing a site for your business. Contact the local business license office where you plan to locate your business. You may not be permitted to conduct business out of your home or engage in industrial activity in a retail district.

### Taxes

IRS Delaware Taxpayer Assistance Center844 King St.Wilmington, DE 19801Phone: 303-318-8441Delaware Division of Revenue820 N French St.Wilmington, DE 19801Phone: 302-577-8205

### Health and safety

Delaware Department of Labor4425 N. Market St., Fourth FloorWilmington, DE 19802

OSHA800 King St., Suite 302Wilmington, DE 19801 Phone: 302-573-6518

## State small business profiles

Need information on the local business landscape? SBA's Office of Advocacy has the latest demographic and statistics on local small business economic activity.

##  Local assistance

          Find counselors        

## SBA lending in our area

-  Loan programs              Learn more about SBA's 7(a) loans, 504 loans, and microloans that you can use for your business.                  Find a loan 
-  Lender Match              Describe your business needs and get matched with an SBA-backed lender in your area.                  Get matched with a lender 
-  Lending activity reports              View 7(a) and 504 lending activity reports from our district.                  View lending reports 

## Additional local resources

###         State and local governments      

                    -  Delaware State Website 
                    -  Sussex County Economic Development 

###         Community organizations      

                    -  Delaware State Chamber of Commerce 
                    -  New Castle County Website 
                    -  Kent County Partnership 
                    -  Delaware Volunteer Legal Services 

##           Download our guide to SBA resources        

Learn about the opportunities available for small businesses nationwide.

Download English version PDFDownload Spanish version PDF
vvi-ex10k1_789.htm



Exhibit 10.K1

 

SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION PROGRAM OF

NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS OF VIAD CORP

AS OF FEBRUARY 23, 2016

 

Board of Directors

     Annual Retainer$45,000

    Meeting Attendance Fee$1,600

     Restricted Stock (Annual Grant)1Value of $100,000

 

Independent Chairman of Board of Directors

     Annual Retainer$100,000

 

Audit Committee

     Meeting Attendance Fee $1,500

     Committee Chairman Annual Retainer $20,000

 

Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

     Meeting Attendance Fee $1,500

     Committee Chairman Annual Retainer$10,000

 

Human Resources Committee

     Meeting Attendance Fee $1,500Committee Chairman Annual Retainer$17,500

 

Additional Benefits2

 

---------------------


	
1
	
The annual grant occurs in February of each year and vests 100% three years from the date of the grant, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the form of Restricted Stock Agreement for Outside Directors, effective as of February 25, 2008, pursuant to the 2007 Viad Corp Omnibus Incentive Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.F to Viad Corp’s Form 8-K filed February 28, 2008, or the successor form of such restricted stock agreement filed thereafter.  




 


	
2
	
Non-employee directors may participate in the Directors' Matching Gift Program, which provides for corporate matching of charitable contributions made by non-employee directors, on a dollar-for-dollar basis, up to an aggregate maximum of $5,000 per year to qualified non-profit organizations having tax exempt status under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Viad Corp also provides non-employee directors with accidental death and dismemberment insurance benefits of $300,000 and travel accident insurance benefits of $300,000 when they are traveling on corporate business.
|   |      1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |      2)  The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                           |   |                                                                     |
|--------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                           |   |                                                                     |   |
| Date:  July 28, 2010 |   | /s/ Todd A. Daniels                                                 |   |
|                           |   | Todd A. Daniels                                                          |   |
|                           |   | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |   |
|                           |   |                                                                     |   |