alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
The Southeastern Consortium for Substance Abuse Training: Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (SECSAT_APRN)

1. Program Description & Model

The Mercer SBIRT program––Southeastern Consortium for Substance Abuse Training: Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (SECSAT-APRN)––aims to equip master’s-level Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN) students, faculty, and preceptors across eight individual institutions with the skills needed to provide evidence-based, culturally competent screening, brief intervention, brief treatment, and referral to specialty treatment for patients with unhealthy substance use. They also seek to promote the use of SBIRT in clinical practice through competency certification of trainees, instruction in billing and coding, regional dissemination workshops, and advocacy for advances in training and reimbursement. The SECSAT-APRN team will adapt SAMHSA’s comprehensive skills-based clinical curriculum for use by APRNs, utilize online modules to teach didactic content and focus in-person learning on skills practice. SECSAT-APRN faculty will oversee curriculum adaptations, conduct faculty development workshops, provide on-site support for key training modules and oversee on-site quality improvement. SBIRT site coordinators will receive faculty development training, integrate curriculum into existing courses, train preceptors to evaluate trainees’ SBIRT skills, and certify students who meet competency requirements. APRNs will receive training and tools for implementing SBIRT in their future practices. SBIRT dissemination will occur via regional workshops and entry of graduates into the workforce.

2. Special/Unique Features

This program consists of 8 different institutions: Armstrong Atlantic State University, Emory University, Georgia College and State University, Mercer University, University of North Georgia, South University, University of Alabama, Birmingham and Johns Hopkins University.  Training will be integrated across the trajectory of the student trainees’ APRN training. The range of APRN specialties is broad, including Family Nurse Practitioners, Adult Geriatric Nurse Practitioners, Adult Primary Care Nurse Practitioners, Pediatric Nurse Practitioners, Emergency Nurse Practitioners, and Women’s Nurse Practitioners. Program graduates will serve throughout the healthcare system in primary care, urgent care and emergency settings, hospitals, nursing homes, student health clinics, pediatric and adolescent health facilities, with the majority serving in primary care. Training of these individuals will diffuse SBIRT broadly across the healthcare system into primary care, acute care, chronic care, and hospital systems, serving patients from a wide variety of cultural backgrounds all across the lifespan.   

3.            Website URL (if applicable)

In the process of being updated to reflect APRN material:  www.sbirtonline.org

4.            Contact information for the project director 

Project Investigator:  Dr. Paul Seale

Seale.paul@mccg.org

478-633-5552

Project Coordinator:  Annie Biers, LPC

Biers.annie@mccg.org

478-633-5547

Administrative Assistant:  Shannon Murray

Murray.shannon@mccg.org
### §1213. Authorization of appropriations

For the purpose of carrying out the provisions of this chapter, there is authorized to be appropriated for the period commencing on September 26, 1970, and ending June 30, 1975, not to exceed $4,500,000.

(Pub. L. 91–427, §3, Sept. 26, 1970, 84 Stat. 884.)
#### § 10.8 Information to be kept current.

A supplemental statement must be filed with the Attorney General within thirty days after the expiration of each period of six months succeeding the original filing of a registration statement. Each supplemental statement must contain information and documents as may be necessary to make information and documents previously filed accurate and current with respect to the preceding six months' period.
#### Ellis *v.*Ellis.

Holden, J.

1. Where an affidavit offered in evidence by the plaintiff purported to be sworn to and subscribed before S. O. Smith, as deputy clerk, to the admission of which objection was made by the defendant on the ground “that it did not appear what Smith was deputy clerk *288of,” and when such objection was made ■ counsel for the plaintiff “stated in his place that S. O. Smith was deputy clerk of the superior court of Haralson county and that he saw said Smith attest said affidavit,” which statement appears as a part of the brief of evidence set forth in the bill of exceptions, to which no objection was made, the court did not err in admitting the affidavit in evidence over the objection named.

March 19, 1910.

Rule for contempt. Before Judge Wright. Floyd superior court.

August 30, 1909.

*M. B. Eubanhs,*for plaintiff in error.

*Griffith & Matthews,*contra.

2. The deputy clerk of the superior court is competent to administer oaths and attest affidavits to be used as evidence in judicial proceedings. Civil Code, §§ 4359, 4302; *Ballard*v. *Orr,*105 *Ga.*191 (31 S. E. 554) ; *Biggers*v. *Winkles,*124 *Ga.*991 (53 S. E. 397).

3. When upon the hearing of a rule nisi issued at the instance of the wife against the husband, requiring him to show cause why he should not be attached for disobedience to an order or decree directing him to pay over to the movant a certain sum as temporary alimony, evidence in the latter’s favor was introduced without objection, it was the duty of the judge to consider the same in making up his judgment, though no written traverse of the husband’s answer had been filed. *Harris*v. *Lamar,*102 *Ga.*154 (29 S. E. 162).

4. The judgment rendered in this ease was supported by the evidence, and no error was committed in granting the attachment for contempt.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent.*
# C_2011113EN.01000703.xml

| 9.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/7

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Ivrea (Italy) lodged on 4 February 2011 — Criminal proceedings against Lucky Emegor

(Case C-50/11)

2011/C 113/14

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale di Ivrea

Party to the main proceedings

Party to the main proceedings

Lucky Emegor

Question referred

Question referred

In the light of the principles of sincere cooperation and the effectiveness of directives, do Articles 15 and 16 of Directive 2008/115/EC (1) preclude a third-country national staying unlawfully in national territory from being sentenced to a term of imprisonment of up to four years in the event of failure to comply with the initial order issued by the Questore for removal from national territory within five days of notification, and a term of between one and five years’ imprisonment for failure to comply with subsequent orders, with the police authorities under an obligation to arrest those engaged in the commission of this offence, solely on account of his failure to cooperate in the deportation procedure and in particular failure to comply with the removal order issued by the administrative authorities?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2008 L 348, p. 98.

1

---
### §1679f. Noncompliance with this subchapter

#### (a) Consumer waivers invalid

Any waiver by any consumer of any protection provided by or any right of the consumer under this subchapter—

(1) shall be treated as void; and

(2) may not be enforced by any Federal or State court or any other person.

#### (b) Attempt to obtain waiver

Any attempt by any person to obtain a waiver from any consumer of any protection provided by or any right of the consumer under this subchapter shall be treated as a violation of this subchapter.

#### (c) Contracts not in compliance

Any contract for services which does not comply with the applicable provisions of this subchapter—

(1) shall be treated as void; and

(2) may not be enforced by any Federal or State court or any other person.

(Pub. L. 90–321, title IV, §408, as added Pub. L. 104–208, div. A, title II, §2451, Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–459.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable after the end of the 6-month period beginning on Sept. 30, 1996, except with respect to contracts entered into by a credit repair organization before the end of such period, see section 413 of Pub. L. 90–321, as added by Pub. L. 104–208, set out as a note under section 1679 of this title.
-  Home 

# In This Section

                      -  Learn About the Seaway 
                      -  Interactive Shipping Map and Shipping Schedule 
                      -  Videos about the Seaway 
                      -  Visitor Center 

## Related Links

                  -                                          Interactive Map of the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Seaway                   

## Contact the GLS

Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation (GLS)Policy HeadquartersU.S. Department of Transportation
1200 New Jersey Ave, SE W62-300Washington, DC20590United States

**Email:**GLS@dot.gov**Phone:**202-366-0091****Alt Phone:**800-785-2779****Fax:**202-366-7147****Business Hours:**8:00am-5:00 pm ET, M-F

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

                            - GLS on Facebook
                            - GLS on Twitter
                            - GLS on Instagram
                            - Great Lakes - St. Lawrence Seaway

# Interactive Shipping Map and Shipping Schedule

**Interested in vessels transiting the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Seaway System? Try out these great resources!**

*Dial 315-769-2422 for today's transit times or visit the Seaway's Interactive **Map **of Vessels Currently in Transit!*
#### Emanuel Deutsch, Doing Business under the Name of Unity Sanitary Supply Company, Respondent, *v.*Hoge Brush Company, Individually and Doing Business as a Subsidiary of the Hoge Lumber Company, a Foreign Corporation, Appellant, et al, Defendants.

First Department,

May 7, 1943.

*117
      *Meyer Kraushaar*of counsel *(Benjamin Stender,*attorney), for appellant, appearing specially.

*Irving H. Saypol*of counsel *(Leo Hotter*with him on the brief; *James A. Dunne, Jr.,*attorney), for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The individual appellants Herman Hoge, Arthur Hoge, Gus Hoge, Joel Hoge and Oliver Hoge, all sued herein as “ Hoge Brush Company, individually and d/b [doing business] as a subsidiary of the Hoge Lumber Company, a foreign corporation, ” “were not made parties defendant to this action and were not at any time served with process.

The conduct of the Pennsylvania attorney in obtaining a copy of the complaint and an extension of time to answer was not a general appearance nor did it vest the court with jurisdiction of the person of these nonresident appellants. Moreover, there is no showing that the appearance of the attorney was ever authorized by any one of the appellants. *(Amusement Securities Corp.*v. *Academy Pict. Dist. Corp.,*251 App. Div. 227, 229.)

The orders should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the complaint dismissed.

Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ., concur.

Orders, so far as appealed from, unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and the complaint dismissed.
### §1683. Pilot projects; requirements; residue removal credits as compensation; implementation guidelines

The Secretary may carry out pilot wood residue utilization projects under which purchasers of National Forest System timber under contracts awarded prior to October 1, 1986, may, except as otherwise provided in this section, be required to remove wood residues not purchased by them to points of prospective use in return for compensation in the form of "residue removal credits." Such projects may be carried out where the Secretary identifies situations in which pilot wood residue utilization projects on the National Forest system can provide important information on various methods and approaches to increasing the utilization, in residential, commercial, and industrial or powerplant applications, of wood residues and where such information cannot reasonably be obtained unless the pilot projects are done in conjunction with normal National Forest timber sale activities. The residue removal credits shall be applied against the amount payable for the timber purchased and shall represent the anticipated cost of removal of wood residues. The following guidelines shall apply to projects carried out under this section:

(1) Except in cases where wood residue removal is determined to be necessary for fire prevention, site preparation for regeneration, wildlife habitat improvement, or other land management purposes, the Secretary may not provide for removal of wood residues in instances where the anticipated cost of removal would exceed the anticipated value.

(2) The residue removal credits authorized by this section shall not exceed the amount payable by the purchaser for timber after the application of all other designated charges and credits.

(3) The Secretary may sell the wood residues removed to points of prospective use for not less than their appraised value.

(4) Pilot projects, demonstrations, and other programs established pursuant to this subchapter shall be carried out in a manner which does not result in an adverse effect on the furnishing of timber, free of charge, under any other provision of law.

(5) Wood residues shall be collected from a site so as to avoid soil depletion or erosion giving full consideration to the protection of wildlife habitat.

(6) For the purposes of section 500 of this title, (A) any residue removal credit applied under this section shall be considered as "money received" or "moneys received", respectively, and (B) the "money received" or "moneys received", respectively, from the sales of wood residues removed to points of prospective use shall be the proceeds of the sales less the sum of any residue removal credit applied with respect to such residues plus any costs incurred by the Forest Service in processing and storing such residues.

(Pub. L. 96–554, §4, Dec. 19, 1980, 94 Stat. 3257.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1981, see section 9 of Pub. L. 96–554, set out as a note under section 1681 of this title.
### **CHAPTER 32—MARINE SANCTUARIES**

Sec.
1431.
Findings, purposes, and policies; establishment of system.
1432.
Definitions.
1433.
Sanctuary designation standards.
1434.
Procedures for designation and implementation.
1435.
Application of regulations; international negotiations and cooperation.
1436.
Prohibited activities.
1437.
Enforcement.
1438.
Repealed.
1439.
Regulations.
1440.
Research, monitoring, and education.
1441.
Special use permits.
1442.
Cooperative agreements, donations, and acquisitions.
1443.
Destruction or loss of, or injury to, sanctuary resources.
1444.
Authorization of appropriations.
1445.
U.S.S. Monitor artifacts and materials.
1445a.
Advisory Councils.
1445b.
Enhancing support for national marine sanctuaries.
1445c.
Dr. Nancy Foster Scholarship Program.
1445c–1.
Dr. Nancy Foster Scholarship Program.
#### Jens F. Louv, Jr. *v.*Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Shelton

*William J. Curran,*in support of the petition.

*Foster M. Young,*in opposition.

Submitted June 6

decided June 11, 1974

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Fair-field County is denied.
EXHIBIT
      31.2





SECTION
      302 CERTIFICATION





I,
      Michael L. Vizzie, the Chief Financial Officer, certify
      that:





1.  I
      have
      reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of WOM, Inc.





2.  Based
      upon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
      material fact or omit to state a material
      fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
      of
      the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
      respect to the period covered by this report.





3.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
      information included in this report, fairly present in all
      material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
      of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
      report.





4.  I
      am responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
      and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for
      the
      registrant and have:





(a)  designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
      and
      procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material
      information relating to
      the
      registrant, is  made
      known to me by others within the entity, particularly during
      the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)  evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and
      presented in this report my conclusions
      about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
      procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
      evaluation; and





(c)  disclosed
      in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the
      registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth quarter in
      the
      case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
      to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting.





5.  I
      have
      disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal
      control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors
      and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
      performing equivalent functions):





(a)  all
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and





(b)  any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial
      reporting.








Dated:
      February 14, 2007














/s/
      Michael L. Vizzie


Michael
      L. Vizzie
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We have issued our report dated September 24, 2008, accompanying the
consolidated financial statements in the Annual Report of Gilman Ciocia, Inc. on
Form 10K and 10-K/A for the year ended June 30, 2007 and on Form 10-K for the
year ended June 30, 2008. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of
said report in the Registration Statements of Gilman Ciocia on Forms S-8 (File
No. 333-50089, effective April 14, 1998 and File No. 333-14915, effective
October 28, 1996).

                                                    /s/ Sherb & Co, LLP
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Certified Public Accountants

New York, New York
September 26, 2008
# ProofofPublication 

# Uos Angeles <Jrimes

STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of LosAngeles I am a citizen of the United States, and a resident of the county aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years; andI am not a party to or interested in the notice published. I am the chief legal advertising clerk ofthe publisher ofthe LOSANGELES TIME a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published daily in the City ofLos Angeles, County ofLos Angeles. The LOS ANGELES TIMES has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court ofthe County of Los Angeles, State ofCalifornia, under the date (){ May 21, 1952, Case No. 598,599. The notice, ofwhich the annexed is aprinted copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on thefollowing dates, to-wit: September 29
all in theyear2012 I certify (or declare) underpenalty of pe1jury that the foregoing is true and correct Dated at LosAngeles, California, this _1_ day of--=O::...:c::...:t:..::o.:::b..:::.e.:....r
_ 2012

Signature 2386655 California Newspaper Service Bureau•ID Public Notice Advertising Since 1934 Tel1-800-788-7840 o Fax 1-800-540-4089 Local Offices and Representatives in: Los Angeles, Santa Ana, San Diego, Riverside'San Bernardino, San Francisco, Oakland.. San Jose, Santa Rosa. and Sacramento. Special Services Available in Phoenix

111111111111 IIIII 11111111111111111m1 1111111111111111111111111111 

# * A 

### 0 0 0 0 0 2 8 3 4 1 9 

### 1 

# *
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           9,125
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,091
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,289
<PP&E>                                          60,166
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 261,598
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,261
<BONDS>                                        292,034
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       189,670
<OTHER-SE>                                   (238,894)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   261,598
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                59,031
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  107,093
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              43,682
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (53,655)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,184)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (52,471)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (52,471)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.06)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended January 1,
2011 of the Company, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Robert W. HumphreysRobert W. HumphreysChairman and Chief Executive Officer