Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 52 / Friday, March 16, 2012 / Notices 15841 

USTR–2011–0015. Instructions for 

submitting business confidential 

versions are provided below. Handdelivered submissions will not be 

accepted. Submissions must be 

submitted in English to the Chairman of 

the GSP Subcommittee, Trade Policy 

Staff Committee, by the deadline set 

forth in this notice. 

All submissions for the GSP Annual 

Review must conform to the GSP 

regulations set forth at 15 CFR part 

2007, except as modified below. These 

regulations are available on the USTR 

Web site at http://www.ustr.gov/tradetopics/trade-development/preferenceprograms/generalized-systempreference-gsp/gsp-program-inf. Any 

person or party making a submission is 

strongly advised to review the GSP 

regulations as well as the GSP 

Guidebook, which is available at the 

same link. 

To make a submission using 

www.regulations.gov, enter docket 

number USTR–2011–0015 in the 

‘‘Search’’ field on the home page and 

click ‘‘Search.’’ The site will provide a 

search-results page listing all documents 

associated with this docket. Locate the 

reference to this notice by selecting 

‘‘Notice’’ under ‘‘Document Type’’ in 

the section on the left hand side of the 

search-results page, and click on the 

link entitled ‘‘Submit a Comment’’ on 

the right-hand side of the page under 

the heading ‘‘Actions.’’ The 

www.regulations.gov Web site offers the 

option of providing comments by filling 

in a ‘‘Type Comment’’ field or by 

attaching a document using the ‘‘Upload 

file(s)’’ field. Given the detailed nature 

of the information sought by the GSP 

Subcommittee, it is preferred that 

submissions be provided in an attached 

document. When attaching a document, 

type (1) 2011 GSP Annual Product 

Review; (2) the product description and 

related HTS tariff number; (3) ‘‘See 

attached’’ in the ‘‘Type Comment’’ field 

on the online submission form, and 

indicate on the attachment that the 

document is, ‘‘Written Comments’’ 

Submissions should not exceed 30 

single-spaced, standard letter-size pages 

in 12-point type, including attachments. 

Any data attachments to the submission 

should be included in the same file as 

the submission itself, and not as 

separate files. 

Each submitter will receive a 

submission tracking number upon 

completion of the submissions 

procedure at www.regulations.gov. The 

tracking number will be the submitter’s 

confirmation that the submission was 

received into www.regulations.gov. The 

confirmation should be kept for the 

submitter’s records. USTR is not able to 

provide technical assistance for the web 

site. Documents not submitted in 

accordance with these instructions may 

not be considered in this review. If 

unable to provide submissions as 

requested, please contact the GSP 

Program at USTR to arrange for an 

alternative method of transmission. 

Business Confidential Submissions 

A person seeking to request that 

information contained in a submission 

from that person be treated as business 

confidential information must certify 

that such information is business 

confidential and would not customarily 

be released to the public by the 

submitter. Confidential business 

information must be clearly designated 

as such. The submission must be 

marked ‘‘BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL’’ 

at the top and bottom of the cover page 

and each succeeding page, and the 

submission should indicate, via 

brackets, the specific information that is 

confidential. Additionally, ‘‘Business 

Confidential’’ must be included in the 

‘‘Type Comment’’ field. 

A person submitting public and 

business confidential submissions must 

submit each of them separately in the 

appropriate docket at 

www.regulations.gov: One submission 

containing the clearly-marked business 

confidential information, and a separate 

submission containing the public 

version of the submission, indicating 

where confidential information has been 

redacted. 

Public versions of all documents 

relating to the 2011 Annual Review will 

be made available for public viewing in 

docket USTR–2011–0015 at 

www.regulations.gov upon completion 

of processing and no later than one 

week after the due date. 

William Jackson, 

Deputy Assistant U.S. Trade Representative 

for the Generalized System of Preferences, 

Office of the U.S. Trade Representative. 

[FR Doc. 2012–6349 Filed 3–15–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3190–W2–P 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES 

TRADE REPRESENTATIVE 

Generalized System of Preferences 

(GSP): Change in Hearing Date for the 

2011 Annual GSP Product Review 

AGENCY: Office of the United States 

Trade Representative. 

ACTION: Notice of change to hearing date 

and due date for post-hearing 

comments. 

SUMMARY: The date of the hearing for the 

2011 Annual GSP Product Review is 

changed to Thursday, March 29, 2012. 

Post-hearing comments are due 

Monday, April 16, 2012. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

February 21, 2012, a notice was 

published in the Federal Register (77 

FR 10034) announcing, inter alia, that 

the hearing for the 2011 Annual GSP 

Product Review was scheduled for 

March 20, 2012 and post-hearing 

comments were due April 10, 2012. 

This notice changes the time and date 

of that hearing to 1 p.m., Thursday, 

March 29, 2012 and the due date for 

post-hearing comments to 5 p.m., 

Monday, April 16, 2012. The hearing 

will cover only the petitions for new 

products and CNL waivers that have 

been previously submitted and accepted 

for review in the 2011 GSP Annual 

Review. (See 76 FR 67531 and 77 FR 

10034.) 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Tameka Cooper, GSP Program, Office of 

the United States Trade Representative, 

600 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 

20508. The telephone number is (202) 

395–6971; the fax number is (202) 395– 

9674, and the email address is 

Tameka_Cooper@ustr.eop.gov. 

William D. Jackson, 

Deputy Assistant U.S. Trade Representative 

for the Generalized System of Preferences and 

Chair of the GSP Subcommittee of the Trade 

Policy Staff Committee, Office of the U.S. 

Trade Representative. 

[FR Doc. 2012–6454 Filed 3–15–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3190–W2–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Notice of Passenger Facility Charge 

(PFC) Approvals and Disapprovals 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Monthly Notice of PFC 

Approvals and Disapprovals. 

SUMMARY: The FAA publishes a monthly 

notice, as appropriate, of PFC approvals 

and disapprovals under the provisions 

of the Aviation Safety and Capacity 

Expansion Act of 1990 (Title IX of the 

Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 

1990) (Pub. L. 101–508) and Part 158 of 

the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 

CFR part 158). This notice is published 

pursuant to paragraph (d) of § 158.29. In 

February 2012,there were six 

applications approved. Additionally, 11 

approved amendments to previously 

approved applications are listed. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

15842 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 52 / Friday, March 16, 2012 / Notices 

PFC Applications Approved 

Public Agency: County and City of 

Yakima, Washington. 

Application Number: 12–14–C–00– 

YKM. 

Application Type: Impose and use a 

PFC. 

PFC Level: $4.50. 

Total PFC Revenue Approved in this 

Decision: $703,801. 

Earliest Charge Effective Date: August 

1, 2012. 

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: 

February 1, 2014. 

Class of Air Carriers Not Required To 

Collect PFCs: 

Air taxi/commercial operators— 

nonscheduled/on-demand air carriers 

filing FAA Form 1800–31. 

Determination: Approved. Based on 

information contained in the public 

agency’s application, the FAA has 

determined that the approved class 

accounts for less than 1 percent of the 

total annual enplanements at Yakima 

Air Terminal—McAllister Field Airport. 

Brief Description of Projects Approved 

for Collection and Use 

Snow removal equipment purchase— 

design. 

Terminal apron rehabilitation— 

design. 

Taxiway Alpha and connectors 

rehabilitation—design. 

Snow removal equipment purchase. 

Terminal apron rehabilitation. 

Taxiway Alpha and connectors 

rehabilitation. 

Acquire runway friction tester 

(decelerometer). 

Acquire miscellaneous equipment. 

Environmental mitigation. 

Security enhancement. 

Decision Date: February 2, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mary Vargas, Seattle Airports District 

Office, (425) 227–2660. 

Public Agency: City of Modesto, 

California. 

Application Number: 12–08–C–00– 

MOD. 

Application Type: Impose and use a 

PFC. 

PFC Level: $4.50. 

Total PFC Revenue Approved in this 

Decision: $111,806. 

Earliest Charge Effective Date: April 1, 

2012. 

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: 

December 1, 2012. 

Class of Air Carriers Not Required to 

Collect PFC’S: None. 

Brief Description of Projects Approved 

for Collection and Use 

Conduct miscellaneous studies. 

Procure Americans with Disabilities 

Act lift. 

Reconstruct northwest apron. 

Construct new windsocks. 

Construct new perimeter security 

fence. 

Environmental study. 

PFC administration costs. 

Brief Description of Withdrawn Projects 

Apron rehabilitation. 

Enhance runway safety area. 

Date of Withdrawal: February 9, 2012. 

Decision Date: February 10, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Arlene Draper, San Francisco Airports 

District Office, (650) 827–7602. 

Public Agency: City of Columbia, 

Missouri. 

Application Number: 12–03–C–00– 

COU. 

Application Type: Impose and use a 

PFC. 

PFC Level: $4.50. 

Total PFC Revenue Approved in this 

Decision: $2,140,461. 

Earliest Charge Effective Date: 

February 1, 2013. 

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: 

December 1, 2026. 

Class of Air Carriers Not Required To 

Collect PFCs: None. 

Brief Description of Projects Approved 

for Collection and Use 

Airport master plan update. 

Wildlife management assessment of 

hazards. 

Environmental assessment. 

Terminal restroom renovation. 

Taxiway A reconstruction. 

Snow removal equipment. 

Update airport exhibit A property 

map. 

Aircraft rescue and firefighting truck. 

PFC audit fees. 

Brief Description of Projects Approved 

for Collection 

Expand air carrier auto parking lot. 

Wildlife deterrent fence. 

Airport land acquisition. 

Rehabilitate runway 13/31 and 

taxiway B. 

Extend runway 13/31 and taxiway B. 

Re-align Route H and Rangeline Road. 

Extend runway 2/20 and navigational 

aids. 

Aircraft rescue and firefighting 

building expansion. 

Decision Date: February 10, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Todd Madison, Central Region Airports 

Division, (816) 329–2640. 

Public Agency: City of Midland, 

Texas. 

Application Number: 12–06–C–00– 

MAF. 

Application Type: Impose and use a 

PFC. 

PFC Level: $4.50. 

Total PFC Revenue Approved in this 

Decision: $1,319,287. 

Earliest Charge Effective Date: August 

1, 2015. 

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: 

May 1, 2016. 

Classes of Air Carriers Not Required 

to Collect PFCs: 

(1) Part 135 air taxi/commercial 

operators filing FAA Form 1800–31; (2) 

commuter and small certificated air 

carriers filing Department of 

Transportation Form T–100 for 

nonscheduled operations; and (3) large 

certificated route air carriers filing 

Department of Transportation Form T– 

100 for non-scheduled operations. 

Determination: Approved. Based on 

information contained in the public 

agency’s application, the FAA has 

determined that each approved class 

accounts for less than 1 percent of the 

total annual enplanements at Midland 

International Airport. 

Brief Description of Projects Approved 

for Collection and Use 

Terminal building rehabilitation. 

Executive apron reconstruction. 

Northwest taxilane and emergency 

perimeter roadway extension. 

Wildlife hazard assessment. 

Runways 4/22 and 16U34R 

rehabilitation design. 

Emergency perimeter roadway and 

gates rehabilitation. 

Airport drainage improvements— 

phase 1. 

Entrance road guidance signage 

rehabilitation. 

Airport radio communication system 

upgrade. 

Airfield lighting cable replacement. 

Taxiway V apron expansion. 

Decision Date: February 13, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Marcelino Sanchez, Texas Airports 

Development Office, (817) 222–5652. 

Public Agency: County of Pitkin, 

Aspen, Colorado. 

Application Number: 12–08–C–00– 

ASE. 

Application Type: Impose and use a 

PFC. 

PFC Level: $4.50. 

Total PFC Revenue Approved in this 

Decision: $3,211,592. 

Earliest Charge Effective Date: August 

1, 2012. 

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: 

February 1, 2016. 

Class of Air Carriers Not Required to 

Collect PFCs: Nonscheduled/on-demand 

air carriers filing FAA Form 1800–31. 

Determination: Approved. Based on 

information contained in the public 

agency’s application, the FAA has 

determined that the approved class 

accounts for less than 1 percent of the 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 52 / Friday, March 16, 2012 / Notices 15843 

total annual enplanements at Aspen/ 

Pitkin County Airport. 

Brief Description of Projects Approved 

for Collection and Use 

Acquire snow removal equipment 

(plow). 

Extend runway 15/33. 

Construct connector taxiway. 

Construct south deice pad apron. 

Improve runway safety area. 

PFC application and administration 

fees. 

Decision Date: February 17, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jesse Lyman, Denver Airports District 

Office, (303) 342–1262. 

Public Agency: City of Klamath Falls, 

Oregon. 

Application Number: 12–03–C–00– 

LMT. 

Application Type: Impose and use a 

PFC. 

PFC Level: $4.50. 

Total PFC Revenue Approved in This 

Decision: $987,785. 

Earliest Charge Effective Date: April 1, 

2012. 

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: 

October 1, 2023. 

Class of Air Carriers Not Required To 

Collect PFCs: None. 

Brief Description of Projects Approved 

for Collection and Use 

Terminal enhancements. 

Security enhancements. 

Construct north end perimeter road. 

Conduct miscellaneous studies. 

Rehabilitate runway 14/32. 

Rehabilitate runway 7/25. 

Environmental mitigation. 

Acquire snow removal equipment. 

PFC administration costs. 

Decision Date: February 27, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Trang Tran, Seattle Airports District 

Office, (425) 227–1662. 

AMENDMENTS TO PFC APPROVALS

Amendment No., City, State Amendment 

approved date 

Original 

approved net 

PFC revenue 

Amended 

approved net 

PFC revenue 

Original 

estimated 

charge exp. 

date 

Amended 

estimated 

charge exp. 

date 

03–06–C–01–ACV; Arcata, CA. .......................................... 2/01/12 $578,450 $523,597 03/01/05 03/01/05 

05–07–C–01–ACV; Arcata, CA. .......................................... 2/02/12 392,265 336,981 10/01/05 10/01/05 

09–03–C–02–PGV; Greenville, NC. .................................... 2/03/12 596,985 396,985 10/01/11 10/01/11 

03–02–C–01–MCW; Mason City, IA. ................................... 2/08/12 379,500 303,061 02/01/12 02/01/12 

08–07–C–01–MOD; Modesto, CA. ...................................... 2/10/12 395,134 337,634 12/01/15 04/01/12 

99–02–C–07–MCI; Kansas City, MO. ................................. 2/14/12 7,375,439 6,741,254 05/01/11 04/01/11 

09–09–C–02–BUR; Burbank, CA. ....................................... 2/16/12 21,965,000 24,965,000 05/01/15 09/01/15 

09–06–C–01–PUW; Pullman, WA. ...................................... 2/17/12 255,998 271,077 05/01/11 12/01/10 

10–11–C–02–ATL; Atlanta, GA. .......................................... 2/21/12 422,480,178 347,373,302 01/01/23 07/01/22 

94–01–C–04–RIC; Richmond, VA. ...................................... 2/23/12 11,847,867 11,846,842 05/01/98 05/01/98 

01–04–C–04–RIC; Richmond, VA. ...................................... 2/23/12 3,401,433 2,647,868 11/01/16 114/01/16 

Issued in Washington, DC on March 8, 

2012. 

Joe Hebert, 

Manager, Financial Analysis and Passenger 

Faculty Charge Branch. 

[FR Doc. 2012–6315 Filed 3–15–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

National Highway Traffic Safety 

Administration 

Petition for Exemption From the 

Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard; 

Nissan 

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic 

Safety Administration (NHTSA) 

Department of Transportation (DOT). 

ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption. 

SUMMARY: This document grants in full 

Nissan North America, Inc.’s (Nissan) 

petition for exemption of the Juke 

vehicle line in accordance with 49 CFR 

Part 543, Exemption from Vehicle Theft 

Prevention Standard. This petition is 

granted, because the agency has 

determined that the antitheft device to 

be placed on the line as standard 

equipment is likely to be as effective in 

reducing and deterring motor vehicle 

theft as compliance with the partsmarking requirements of the Theft 

Prevention Standard (49 CFR part 541). 

Nissan requested confidential treatment 

of specific information in its petition by 

letter dated November 29, 2011. The 

agency addressed Nissan’s request for 

confidential treatment by letter dated 

December 29, 2011. 

DATES: The exemption granted by this 

notice is effective beginning with the 

2013 model year (MY). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Carlita Ballard, Office of International 

Policy, Fuel Economy and Consumer 

Programs, NHTSA, West Building, 

W43–439, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC 20590. Ms. Ballard’s 

telephone number is (202) 366–5222. 

Her fax number is (202) 493–2990. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a 

petition dated November 29, 2011, 

Nissan requested an exemption from the 

parts-marking requirements of the Theft 

Prevention Standard (49 CFR part 541) 

for the MY 2013 Nissan Juke vehicle 

line. The petition requested an 

exemption from parts-marking pursuant 

to 49 CFR part 543, Exemption from 

Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard, 

based on the installation of an antitheft 

device as standard equipment for the 

entire vehicle line. 

Under § 543.5(a), a manufacturer may 

petition NHTSA to grant an exemption 

for one vehicle line per model year. In 

its petition, Nissan provided a detailed 

description and diagram of the identity, 

design and location of the components 

of the antitheft device for the Juke 

vehicle line. Nissan will install a 

passive transponder-based, electronic 

immobilizer, antitheft device as 

standard equipment on its Juke vehicle 

line beginning with MY 2013. Major 

components of the antitheft device will 

include an engine control module, 

immobilizer/body control module 

(BCM), immobilizer antenna and a 

security indicator light. Nissan will also 

install an audible and visible alarm 

system on the Juke as standard 

equipment. Nissan stated that activation 

of the immobilization device occurs 

automatically when the ignition key is 

turned to the ‘‘OFF’’ position and all the 

doors are closed and locked through the 

use of the key or the remote control 

mechanism. Deactivation occurs when 

all the doors are unlocked with the key 

or remote control mechanism. Nissan’s 

submission is considered a complete 

petition as required by 49 CFR 543.7, in 

that it meets the general requirements 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES