alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §3607. Termination of self-dealing contracts

#### (a) Operation, maintenance, and management contracts; penalty

Any contract or portion thereof which is entered into after October 8, 1980, and which—

(1) provides for operation, maintenance, or management of a condominium or cooperative association in a conversion project, or of property serving the condominium or cooperative unit owners in such project;

(2) is between such unit owners or such association and the developer or an affiliate of the developer;

(3) was entered into while such association was controlled by the developer through special developer control or because the developer held a majority of the votes in such association; and

(4) is for a period of more than three years, including any automatic renewal provisions which are exercisable at the sole option of the developer or an affiliate of the developer,

may be terminated without penalty by such unit owners or such association.

#### (b) Time of termination

Any termination under this section may occur only during the two-year period beginning on the date on which—

(1) special developer control over the association is terminated; or

(2) the developer owns 25 per centum or less of the units in the conversion project,

whichever occurs first.

#### (c) Vote of owners of units

A termination under this section shall be by a vote of owners of not less than two-thirds of the units other than the units owned by the developer or an affiliate of the developer.

#### (d) Effective date of termination

Following the unit owners' vote, the termination shall be effective ninety days after hand delivering notice or mailing notice by prepaid United States mail to the parties to the contract.

(Pub. L. 96–399, title VI, §608, Oct. 8, 1980, 94 Stat. 1676.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

In subsec. (a), "October 8, 1980" was substituted for "the effective date of this title". See Effective Date note set out under section 3601 of this title.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DENNIS MADDREY,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 109 MM 2020

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 6th day of August , 2020

, the “Application for King’s Bench

Authority/Extraordinary Relief” is DENIED.
### SUBCHAPTER IV—WETLANDS INVENTORY AND TREND ANALYSIS
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32


      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Overhill Farms,
Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended January 2, 2005 (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certify in their capacities as Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  February 9, 2005                     By: /s/ James Rudis
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                  James Rudis
                                                  Chief Executive Officer
                                                  (principal executive officer)


Dated:  February 9, 2005                     By: /s/ John L. Steinbrun
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                  John L. Steinbrun
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
                                                  (principal financial officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures
that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
Open Meeting of the 

SEC Advisory Committee on Improvements to Financial Reporting 

Auditorium, Room L002, SEC Headquarters 

Washington, D.C. 

Friday, November 2, 2007, Beginning at 9:30 A.M. 

 

AGENDA 

I. Introductory Remarks – Robert Pozen, Committee Chairman 

 

II. Review of Comments Letters Received 

 

III. Reports from Subcommittees and Discussion: 

 

1. Scope 

2. Deliberations 

3. Working Hypotheses 

4. Current Status and Further Work 

5. Coordination with Other Subcommittees 

 

IV. Next Steps and Future Timetable 

 

V. Planning for January Meeting 

 

VI. Adjournment (expected no later than 3:00 pm)
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  SBA Leadership 
-  Julie Brill 

#   Julie Brill

Deputy Chief Human Capital Officer

Office of the Chief Information Officer

            Download high-resolution image          

Julie Brill was appointed as the U.S. Small Business Administration’s Deputy Chief Human Capital Officer in June 2019.  Ms. Brill’s responsibilities cover all aspects of human resources and human capital management, including the selection, development, and management of SBA’s workforce in support of the agency’s mission. 

Ms. Brill previously served in various roles at the US Office of Personnel Management (OPM), including the Manager of Leadership and Executive Development and Work-Life policy.  In this role, she provided government-wide oversight and guidance for the development of leaders at all levels of the government, as well as the well-being of all Federal employees.  Her portfolio also included outreach and support to agencies as they worked on improving employee engagement.  In addition, Ms. Brill served as OPM’s Deputy HR Director, Director of HR Policy and Chief Learning Officer, and a Personnel Psychologist.    

Ms. Brill received her Bachelor of Arts degree in Psychology from Vassar College, a Master of Science degree in Clinical Psychology from American University, and a Master of Science degree in Industrial/Organizational Psychology from The Graduate Center of City University of New York (Baruch College).
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0453

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

TOSTON GRAY LAFOURNAISE,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including August 19, 2020, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 10 2020

07/10/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0453
---

---

EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Robomatix Technologies Ltd. (the Company)
on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Amit Goldwasser, as
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

| | 1. | the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
                    Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | /S/ AMIT GOLDWASSER
Amit GoldwasserChief Executive Officer
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------

June 30, 2005

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.



---

---
Mai= INEMENEO Moreover, our independent review of the record demonstrates that the

district court properly dismissed appellant's complaint as to each of the nine defendants. 2 We therefore

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.



### IA-4k \ Hardesty 

## 're/AA 01.-5:cc' P arraguirre , J.

cc: Hon. James Todd Russell, District Judge Matthew Corzine Attorney General/Carson City Carson City Clerk

2 Although appellant argued in his opposition to respondents' motion to dismiss that he had satisfied the $10,000 jurisdictional threshold by requesting punitive damages, appellant would not have been entitled to such damages. See NRS 41.035(1).

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Document Search 
-  SBIC Licensee Financial Statements and Investment Performance 

# SBIC Licensee Financial Statements and Investment Performance

## About this document and download

This package contains:
                  - Form 468 Instructions - SBIC Financial Reports
                  - Form 468 - SBIC Financial Report
                  - Form 468 - Reinvestor Exhibit

The 468 Instructions Document (PDF) is currently being remediated to become 508 compliant. If you have any issues/barriers that prevent you from accessing this document, please contact the Office of Investment and Innovation at investinnovate@sba.gov and we can assist you.

  Download  .zip

**Owned by**

**Related Programs**    Related programs:
# C_2010080EN.01004501.xml

| 27.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 80/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 80/45

---

Action brought on 10 February 2010 — Acciaierie e Ferriere Leali Luigi and Leali v Commission

(Case T-56/10)

2010/C 80/71

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Acciaierie e Ferriere Leali Luigi SpA in liquidazione (Brescia, Italy) and Leali SpA (Odolo, Italy) (represented by: G. Belotti, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the Commission’s decision of 8 December 2009 amending the earlier decision C(2009) 7492 final adopted by the Commission on 30 September 2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the Commission’s decision of 8 December 2009 amending the earlier decision C(2009) 7492 final adopted by the Commission on 30 September 2009;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are the same as those advanced in Case T-55/10 SP v Commission.

SP

Commission

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court No. DA 20-0399

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

WILLARD DEAN McCAULOU, 

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until October 10th, 2021 to prepare, 

file and serve the Appellant’s opening brief. 

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 15 2021

09/15/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0399
# cc: Russell Yeager Attorney General/Carson City

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 

# 2 l
### **CHAPTER 22—INTERNATIONAL PARKS**

Sec.
1101.
Definitions.
1102.
Joint United States-Canadian Commission; establishment; functions.
1103.
Powers of Commission.
1104.
Membership of Commission.
1105.
Compensation.
1106.
Employees.
1107.
Meetings and reports; inspection of records.
1108.
Insurance.
1109.
Court action; service of process.
1110.
Liability.
1111.
Exemption from taxation.
1112.
Tax treatment of any gift, devise or bequest to the Commission.
1113.
Authorization of appropriations.
Exhibit






                                                                                                                                                                                  Exhibit 10.23




2014 ADDENDUM TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


This 2014 Addendum to the Employment Agreement (“Agreement”) entered into by and between Travelzoo Local Inc. (the "Company") and Michael Stitt ("Employee") on May 1, 2011 revises, amends and modifies the Agreement as follows:
		
	1.
	Paragraph 3 Compensation and Fringe Benefits, (b) Accelerator Bonus Opportunity, is hereby deleted to reflect the discontinuation of the Accelerator Bonus Opportunity since July 16, 2012. 


		
	2.
	  


		
	3.
	Effective October 1, 2014, Employee will be eligible to participate in a quarterly Performance Bonus plan (“Performance Bonus”), under which Employee may receive, in addition to his Salary, a bonus in an amount between zero and $58,000 (Fifty Eight Thousand Dollars).  Employee must be employed by the Company through the last day of the quarter in order to receive any Performance Bonus attributable to such quarter.


The following schedule applies for calculating a bonus.


	
		
	Quarterly combined North America Travel Publications and Local Deals revenue target exceeded, per the official operating budgets  (not including Fly.com or SuperSearch)
	Bonus is paid on a progression model, in increments of 0.01% improvement.
95% Achievement = 60% Payout = $12,000
100% Achievement = 100% Payout = $20,000
105% Achievement = 120% Payout = $24,000

	Quarterly combined North America Travel Publications and Local Deals income target exceeded, per the official operating budgets (not including Fly.com or SuperSearch)
	Bonus is paid on a progression model, in increments of 0.01% improvement.
90% Achievement = 60% Payout = $12,000
100% Achievement = 100% Payout = $20,000
110% Achievement = 120% Payout = $24,000

	Three quarterly non-revenue and non-income targets, agreed with the CEO at the beginning of the quarter.  These may be product, content, audience or leadership related targets
	Goal 1 = up to $3,333
Goal 2 = up to $3,333
Goal 3= up to $3,333
Total non-revenue and non-income bonus opportunity: up to $10,000




The Company’s Chief Executive Officer will determine if the criteria are met.
The Company shall notify Employee of any changes to the Performance Bonus in writing. The Performance Bonus outlined above supersedes all other written bonus plans.
Any bonus payments, if applicable, shall be made no more than 60 days of the end of the calendar quarter, and will be subject to the usual and applicable withholding and payroll taxes.









Except as expressly set forth herein, all other terms of the Agreement remain in full force and effect. 
COMPANY:
TRAVELZOO LOCAL INC.
By:     
Title:     
Date:     


EMPLOYEE:
        
MICHAEL STITT
Date:
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted March 8, 2011 *

Decided March 11, 2011

Before

RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge

TERENCE T. EVANS

, Circuit Judge

JOHN DANIEL TINDER, Circuit Judge

No. 10

‐ 2911

FARD MOHAMMED

Plaintiff

‐ Appellant,

v.

WISCONSIN INSURANCE SECURITY

FUND, et al.,

Defendants

‐ Appellees. Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.

No. 10

‐ CV

‐ 551

J. P. Stadtmueller,

Judge

.

O R D E R

Fard Mohammed, formerly a hall monitor employed by the Racine Unified School

District, sued the district, the Wisconsin Insurance Security Fund (WISF), and others,

alleging that school officials discriminated against him based on his Islamic faith when they 

### NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1

* The defendants were not served with process in the district court and are not

participating in this appeal. Thus, the appeal is submitted on the appellant’s brief and the

record. After examining these materials, we have concluded that oral argument is

unnecessary. See F ED

. R. A PP

. P. 34(a)(2)(C).No. 10

‐ 2911 Page 2

required him to remove his religious head cover and “pilgrimage ring.” However,

Mohammed had already litigated–unsuccessfully–the same claim in state court, first before

the WISF (an administrative body), and later the Dane County Circuit Court and Wisconsin

Court of Appeals. The district court dismissed the complaint sua sponte, concluding that it

was legally frivolous. See 28 U.S.C § 1915(e)(2). The court explained that Mohammed’s

claim had already been resolved on the merits by the WISF and the Wisconsin state courts,

and that the doctrine of issue preclusion barred him from relitigating issues that were

previously adjudicated.

On appeal Mohammed restates the grievances set forth in his complaint, but

nowhere does he develop any meaningful legal argument, with appropriate references to

the record, as to why the district court erred in dismissing his complaint. See Fed. R. App. P.

28(a)(9)(A). Although we construe a pro se litigant’s brief liberally, we cannot construct

arguments when there are none. Anderson v. Hardman

, 241 F.3d 544, 545

‐ 46 (7th Cir. 2001);

see Fednav. Int’l Ltd. v. Continental Ins. Co.

, 624 F.3d 834, 842 (7th Cir. 2010). Accordingly, the

appeal is

DISMISSED.
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Find Upcoming Events 

# Find upcoming events

## Search results

71 - 80 of 1707 events

        Resource Partner event      

### Business Plans in Action

Tuesday, April 16, 202410:00 a.m.- 12:00 p.m. PDT

        Resource Partner event      

### Business Plans in Action

Tuesday, April 16, 202410:00 a.m.- 12:00 p.m. PDT

        Resource Partner event      

### Manage Your Own Social Media

Tuesday, April 16, 202412:00- 1:00 p.m. CDT

        Resource Partner event      

### Funding Your Nonprofit

Tuesday, April 16, 202412:00- 1:00 p.m. CDT

        Resource Partner event      

### How to Secure Grant Funding - 4/16/2024

Tuesday, April 16, 202412:00- 1:30 p.m. CDT

        Resource Partner event      

### SCORE: A Basic QuickBooks Guide for Small Business Owners

Tuesday, April 16, 202412:00- 1:00 p.m. CDT

        Resource Partner event      

### Understanding the Maze of CA Leave of Absence Laws

Tuesday, April 16, 202410:00- 11:30 a.m. PDT

        Resource Partner event      

### Introduction to Food Service Businesses – Hybrid

Tuesday, April 16, 202410:00- 11:00 a.m. PDT

        Resource Partner event      

### Business Plan in Action

Tuesday, April 16, 202410:00 a.m.- 12:00 p.m. PDT

        Resource Partner event      

### A Basic QuickBooks Guide for Small Business Owners

Tuesday, April 16, 20241:00- 2:00 p.m. EDT

#### Pagination

-  Previous 
-  ... 
-                  Page              4 
-                  Page              5 
-                  Page              6 
-                  Page              7 
-                  Current page              8 
-                  Page              9 
-                  Page              10 
-                  Page              11 
-                  Page              12 
-  ... 
-  Next
§ 367.9020 Account 902, Meter reading expenses. ( a ) This account must include the cost of labor, materials used and expenses incurred in reading customer meters, and determining consumption when performed by employees engaged in reading meters.
( b ) This account must include the following labor items: ( 1 ) Addressing forms for obtaining meter readings by mail.
( 2 ) Changing and collecting meter charts used for billing purposes.
( 3 ) Inspecting time clocks, checking seals, and other similar items, when performed by meter readers and the work represents a minor activity incidental to regular meter reading routine.
( 4 ) Reading meters, including demand meters, and obtaining load information for billing purposes. Exclude and charge to account 586, Meter expenses (§ 367.5000), account 878, Meter and house regulator expenses (§ 367.8000), or to account 903, Customer records and collection expenses (§ 367.9030), as applicable, the cost of obtaining meter readings, first and final, if incidental to the operation of removing or resetting, sealing, or locking, and disconnecting or reconnecting meters.
( 5 ) Computing consumption from meter reader's book or from reports by mail when done by employees engaged in reading meters.
( 6 ) Collecting from prepayment meters when incidental to meter reading.
( 7 ) Maintaining record of customers” keys.
( 8 ) Computing estimated or average consumption when performed by employees engaged in reading meters.
( c ) This account must include the following materials and expenses items: ( 1 ) Badges, lamps, and uniforms.
( 2 ) Demand charts, meter books and binders and forms for recording readings, but not the cost of preparation.
( 3 ) Postage and supplies used in obtaining meter readings by mail.
( 4 ) Transportation, meals, and incidental expenses.