alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 401.34 Submission of project required. Any project which may have a substantial effect on the water resources of the Basin, except as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, shall be submitted to the Commission for a determination as to whether the project impairs or conflicts with the Comprehensive Plan, as follows: ( a ) Where the project is subject to review by a state or federal agency which has entered into an Administrative Agreement with the Commission, such project will be referred to the Commission in accordance with the terms of the Administrative Agreement, and appropriate instructions will be prepared and issued by the Executive Director for guidance of project sponsors and applicants.
( b ) Where no other state or federal agency has jurisdiction to review and approve a project, or no Administrative Agreement is in force, the project sponsor shall apply directly to the Commission.
( c ) Any project proposal, which may have a substantial effect on the water resources of the Basin, may be received and reviewed by the staff informally in conference with the project sponsor during the preliminary planning phase to assist the sponsor to develop the project in accordance with the Commission's requirements.
( d ) Whenever a project sponsored by one of the signatory parties, or by any agency, political subdivision or public corporation thereof, has been included in the Water Resources Program in the “A List” classification, the project, to the extent of such inclusion and as described in the Program, shall be deemed approved for the purposes of Section 3.8 of the Compact.
( e ) Whenever a project is subject to review and approval by the Commission under this section, there shall be no substantial construction activity thereon, including related preparation of land, unless and until the project has been approved by the Commission; provided, however, that this prohibition shall not apply to the drilling of wells for purposes of obtaining geohydrologic data, nor to in-plant control and pretreatment facilities for pollution abatement.
**Order of the President of the General Court of 12 July 2011 – Emme v Commission**

**(Case T-422/10 R)**

Interim measures – Competition – Commission decision imposing a fine – Bank guarantee – Application to suspend the operation of a measure – Financial loss – No exceptional circumstances – No urgency

1.                     *Applications for interim measures – Suspension of operation of a measure – Interim measures – Conditions for granting – Prima
facie case – Urgency – Serious and irreparable damage – Cumulative nature – Balancing of all the interests involved – Order
of examination and method of verification – Discretion of the court hearing the application for interim relief (Arts 256(1)
TFEU, 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 104(2)) (see paras 11-13)*

2.                     *Applications for interim measures – Suspension of operation of a measure – Conditions for granting – Serious and irreparable
damage – Burden of proof – Financial loss – Risk of insolvency (Art. 278 TFEU; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art.
104(2)) (see paras 16-18)*

3.                     *Applications for interim measures – Suspension of operation of a measure – Suspension of the obligation to constitute a bank
guarantee as a condition for not requiring immediate recovery of a fine imposed for breach of the competition rules – Conditions
for granting – Exceptional circumstances – Whether account to be taken of the situation of the group to which the undertaking
belongs and of its shareholders (Art. 278 TFEU; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 104(2)) (see paras 22-37)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | APPLICATION to suspend the operation of Article 2 of Commission Decision C(2010) 4387 final of 30 June 2010 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38.344 – Prestressing steel) and to dispense the applicant from the obligation to provide a bank guarantee so as to avoid immediate recovery of the fine imposed under Article 2 of that decision. |

**Operative part**

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | 2.Costs are reserved. |
## ..

InThe Matter Of: NA YELL! FIGUEROA Respondent 

## SERVED: January 

## 27, 2016
U.S•.DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

. , OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC ' ' l -**~** '**.~** l 

## -. ) ) ) ) ) Docket No. FAA-2015-2443 Case No. 2014S0190129

ERRATA ORDER
OnJanuary 21, 2016, an Order Setting Litigation Dates and Procedures was filed, which contained incorrect dates. Therefore, pursuant to 14 C.F.R. 

### § 13.205(a)(6), and after reviewing all relevant caselaw, regulations, statutory authority, and being 

### fully advised;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The following corrections are made to the January 21, 2016 Order Setting Litigation Dates and Procedures: 

### Page

3 3 

### Line 35 37

Attachment: Service List 

### ReadsJanuary 18, 2016 January 18, 2016 

### Should ReadJanuary 18,2017 January 18, 2017

# .. • 

### DocketNo. FAA-2015-2443 (Civil Penalty Action) 

### SERVICE LIST-BYU.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001



### Mr. RyanM. Landers Complainant's Counsel Office ofthe Regional Counsel, AS0-7 Southern Region 1701 Columbia Avenue College Park, GA 30337 TEL: 404-305-5200 FAX: 404-305-5223 

### Mr. Scott B. Bennett Respondent's Counsel The Bennett Law Center 3377 SW 3rd Avenue Miami, FL 33145 TEL: 305-648-2255 FAX: 305-648-2256 Judge J.E. Sullivan U.S. AdministrativeLawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-6941 FAX: 202-366-7536 ONE COPY

1 Service was byU.S. Mail. For service inperson orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC--430.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-9279-9]

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given that the next meeting of the Children's Health Protection Advisory Committee (CHPAC) will be held March 30 and 31 at the Arlington Court Suites Hotel, 1200 North Courthouse Road, Arlington, VA. The CHPAC was created to advise the Environmental Protection Agency on science, regulations, and other issues relating to children's environmental health.

# DATES:

The CHPAC will meet March 30 and 31, 2011.

# ADDRESSES:

Arlington Court Suites Hotel, 1200 North Courthouse Road, Arlington, VA.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Martha Berger, Office of Children's Health Protection, USEPA, MC 1107T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460, (202) 564-2191,                         *berger.martha@epa.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meetings of the CHPAC are open to the public. Preliminary agenda includes discussion of advice letters on chemical prioritization and on asthma disparities, sustainability and children's health, guidelines to states for school environmental health programs, and the Design for the Environment program.

                    The final agenda will be posted at                     *http://www.epa.gov/​children*.                

*Access:*                     For information on access or services for individuals with disabilities, please contact Martha Berger at 202-564-2191 or                     *berger.martha@epa.gov.*

Dated: March 3, 2011.

Martha Berger,

Designated Federal Official. 

[FR Doc. 2011-5803 Filed 3-11-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Quick Guide: Uninstalling the Conversion Tool

This guide will discuss how to uninstall the EMTS Conversion Tool (ECT). If a version of the Conversion 

Tool is already installed, the user must uninstall the existing version of the Tool before installing a new 

version. The document "Quick Guide -- Installing the Conversion Tool.doc" contains instructions on how to 

install a new version of the ECT. 

Uninstalling the ECT

To begin uninstalling an existing version of the ECT, the user should access the "My Computer" link 

available on the Start Menu (see Figure 1). 

Figure 1: "My Computer" link 

EPA-420-B-10-012 

 February 2010
2 

From the "My Computer" location, the user should look under the "System Tasks" tab on the left side of the 

window and select "Add or remove programs" (see Figure 2). 

Figure 2: "My Computer" Location
3 

On the "Add or Remove Programs" window shown in Figure 3, the user should click on the record for the 

EMTS Conversion Tool (ECT) and then press the "Change/Remove" button within the record. 

Figure 3: "Add or Remove Programs" Window
4 

The resulting screen (see Figure 4) prompts the user to "remove the application from this computer" by 

clicking "OK." Doing so successfully uninstalls the EMTS Conversion Tool. 

Figure 4: "EMTS Conversion Tool (ECT) Maintenance" Window

Note that uninstalling the ECT will not remove the "WRITE" folder or its contents, located at:

C:\Documents and Settings\<user>\My Documents\EMTS Conversion Tool (ECT)
Exhibit 20.1

Chase Manhattan Grantor Trust 1995-B

From: The Chase Manhattan Bank

To:   Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.


                   MONTHLY CERTIFICATEHOLDER'S REPORT
                   ----------------------------------

Due Period 14 Beginning Date                     12/01/1996
Due Period 14 End Date                           12/31/1996
Determination Date                               01/10/1997
Remittance Date                                  01/15/1997


I.    Monthly Principal and Principal Carryover Shortfall to Certificateholders
      (Per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                  $ 26.1730955612

II.   Monthly Interest and Unpaid Interest to Certificateholders
      (Per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                   $ 2.8843715952

III.  Monthly Expenses Summary

      A. Servicing Fee Disbursement                                $ 731,341.30
      B. Cash Collateral Account Expense                                 $ 0.00
      C. Total Expenses paid
         (per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                $ 0.4888765404

IV.   Cash Collateral Account Deposit Amount                             $ 0.00

V.    Outstanding Advance Summary

      A. From Prior Period                                       $ 4,086,358.27
      B. From Current Period                                     $ 4,393,213.08
      C. Change in Amount Between Periods (Lines B - A)            $ 306,854.81

VI.   Pool Factor Information

      A. Certificate Principal Balance                         $ 838,455,575.57
      B. Initial Certificate Balance                         $ 1,495,963,171.74
      C. Pool Factor (Lines A / B)                               0.560478754697

VII.  Available Cash Collateral Account Information for Due Period

      A. Available Cash Collateral Amount                       $ 43,880,478.13
      B. Available Cash Collateral Amount Percentage            4.999999999886%

VIII. Required Cash Collateral Amount

      A. For the Current Collection Period                      $ 43,880,478.13
      B. For the Next Collection Period                         $ 41,922,778.78
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 79 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 79

   To authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to maintain or replace 
certain facilities and structures for commercial recreation services at 
             Smith Gulch in Idaho, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 10, 2019

 Mr. Risch (for himself and Mr. Crapo) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to maintain or replace 
certain facilities and structures for commercial recreation services at 
             Smith Gulch in Idaho, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MAINTENANCE OR REPLACEMENT OF FACILITIES AND STRUCTURES AT 
              SMITH GULCH.

    The authorization of the Secretary of Agriculture to maintain or 
replace facilities or structures for commercial recreation services at 
Smith Gulch under section 3(a)(24)(D) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act 
(16 U.S.C. 1274(a)(24)(D))--
            (1) may include improvements or replacements that the 
        Secretary of Agriculture determines--
                    (A) are consistent with section 9(b) of the Central 
                Idaho Wilderness Act of 1980 (16 U.S.C. 1281 note; 
                Public Law 96-312); and
                    (B) would reduce the impact of the commercial 
                recreation facilities or services on wilderness or wild 
                and scenic river resources and values; and
            (2) authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture to consider 
        including, as appropriate--
                    (A) hydroelectric generators and associated 
                electrical transmission facilities;
                    (B) water pumps for fire suppression;
                    (C) transitions from propane to electrical 
                lighting;
                    (D) solar energy systems;
                    (E) 6-volt or 12-volt battery banks for power 
                storage; and
                    (F) other improvements or replacements which are 
                consistent with this section that the Secretary of 
                Agriculture determines appropriate.
                                 <all>
```
§ 77.15 Nonaccredited States or zones. ( a ) The following are nonaccredited States: None.
( b ) The following are nonaccredited zones: None.
( c ) To qualify for accreditation preparatory status, a nonaccredited State or zone must demonstrate to the Administrator that it complies with the provisions of the “Uniform Methods and Rules—Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication” and that tuberculosis is prevalent in less than 0.5 percent of the total number of herds of cattle and bison in the State or zone.
***Exhibit******32***

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report on Form 10-Q/Aof ASP Ventures Corp. for the quarterly period endedMarch31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,Kurt Dalmata, do hereby        certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

|  | (1)      | This report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|-----------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2)      | The information contained in this report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the registrantat the endof the period covered by this report and resultsof operations of the registrantfor the period covered by this report. |
|--|-----------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Date: January 26, 2009

/s/ Kurt Dalmata

Kurt Dalmata

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Thiscertification accompanies this report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the registrantfor the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as        amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.                 A signed original of this written statement required by §906 hasbeen provided to the registrantand will be retained by the registrantand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

26
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF THE SHAW GROUP INC.


PURSUANT TO 15 U.S.C. SECTION 7241, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, J.M. Bernhard, Jr., certify that:





1. I have reviewed this amended annual report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2012 (the “report”) of The Shaw Group Inc. (the “registrant”);





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;






/s/ J.M. Bernhard, Jr.

J.M. Bernhard, Jr.

Chief Executive Officer




Date: December 21, 2012
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS OF DEERBROOK  PUBLISHING GROUP, INC. FOR THE
NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS.  THIS  EXHIBIT  SHALL NOT BE  DEEMED  FILED FOR THE
PURPOSE  OF  SECTION  11 OF THE  SECURITIES  ACT OF 1933 AND  SECTION  18 OF THE
SECURITIES  EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, OR OTHERWISE  SUBJECT TO THE LIABILITY OF SUCH
SECTIONS,  NOR SHALL IT BE DEEMED A PART OF ANY OTHER FILING WHICH  INCORPORATES
THIS REPORT BY REFERENCE,  UNLESS SUCH OTHER FILING EXPRESSLY  INCORPORATES THIS
EXHIBIT BY REFERENCE.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           5,571
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    149,239
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                99,977
<PP&E>                                         120,138
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,265
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 508,411
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,143,277
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,490
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,429,337
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   508,411
<SALES>                                          1,123
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,123
<CGS>                                            4,899
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,666,527
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               318,100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,988,403)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,988,403)
<DISCONTINUED>                               (374,977)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,363,380)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.25)


</TABLE>
MICHAEL STEVE COX,

Petitioner,
vs. THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WHITE PINE, Respondent. MICHAEL STEVE COX, Petitioner,
vs. THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WHITE PINE, Respondent. No. 62079

No. 62080



### ORDER DENYING WRIT PETITIONS These are seven original proper person petitions for extraordinary relief. The petitions are not consolidated.

Having considered these petitions and supporting documents, we conclude that petitioner's arguments lack merit and that our intervention by way of extraordinary relief is not warranted. Accordingly, we deny the petitions. NRAP 21(b)(1); NRAP 21(c).

Additionally, as demonstrated by the this order, petitioner has filed numerous meritless proper person petitions in this court seeking extraordinary writ relief and has further filed a number of similarly meritless appeals in this court. 

### See Cox v. McDaniel, Docket No. 60056, 

### Cox v. McDaniel, Docket No. 60151, 

### Cox v. Bannister, Docket No. 60637, 

### Cox v. State, Docket No. 61322. We caution appellant that continued filing of such meritless petitions and appeals may result in restrictions on his ability to file papers in this court in forma pauperis. 

### See Jordan v. State, Dept. of Motor Vehicles & Pub. Safety, 121 Nev. 44, 110 P.3d 30 (2005),

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 2

### abrogated on other grounds by Buzz Stew, LLC v. City of N. Las Vegas, 124

Nev. 224, 181 P.3d 670 (2008).

It is so ORDERED. 1

Hardesty

Parraguirre 

# Ovut Cherry

cc: Hon. James Todd Russell, District Judge Michael Steve Cox Attorney General/Carson City Carson City Clerk White Pine County Clerk Eighth District Court Clerk

'In each of these writ petitions, this court has received petitioner's requests for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We direct the clerk of this court to file the May 17, 2011, and the June 28, 2011, motions in Docket No. 58292; the March 19, 2012, motion in Docket No. 60404; the March 19, 2012, motion in Docket No. 60406; the March 19, 2012, motion in Docket No. 60407; the March 19, 2012, motion in Docket No. 60409; the November 20, 2012, motion in Docket No. 62079; and the November 20, 2012, motion in Docket No. 62080. Because petitioner was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in each of these writ petitions, no action is required on these motions.

3