alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010260EN.01002002.xml

| 25.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/20

---

Action brought on 23 July 2010 — Yusef v Commission

(Case T-306/10)

()

2010/C 260/28

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Hani El Sayyed Elsebai Yusef (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: E. Grieves, Barrister and H. Miller, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | declare that the Commission’s failure to act and remove the applicant from annex 1 of Council Regulation (EC) 881/2002 was unlawful; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that the Commission’s failure to act and remove the applicant from annex 1 of Council Regulation (EC) 881/2002 was unlawful;

| — | order immediately the Commission to remove the applicant from the said annex; |
| --- | --- |

—

order immediately the Commission to remove the applicant from the said annex;

| — | order that the Commission pays, in addition to its own costs, those incurred by the applicant and any sums advanced by way of legal aid by the cashier of the Court of Justice. |
| --- | --- |

—

order that the Commission pays, in addition to its own costs, those incurred by the applicant and any sums advanced by way of legal aid by the cashier of the Court of Justice.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant applies under Article 265 TFEU for the revocation of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1629/2005 of 5 October 2005 amending for the 54th time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al Qa’ida Network and the Taliban (1) as concerns him.

1

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

First, he submits that the Commission has failed to independently review the basis of the applicant’s inclusion in annex 1 at any point, or required any reasons for that inclusion.

Second, he claims that the Commission has failed to provide to the applicant any reasons justifying his inclusion in annex 1 in breach of his right to an effective judicial remedy, the right to defend himself and in breach of his rights to property under the European Convention on Human Rights.

Third, he contends that the Commission’s failure to remove the applicant from annex 1 is irrational as there are no reasons available which would satisfy the relevant criteria for inclusion in annex 1 and the United Kingdom Foreign and Commonwealth Office stances that the applicant no longer fulfils the relevant criteria.

---

(1)  OJ 2005 L 260 p. 10

1

---
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the report of Prospect Medical Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”), I, MikeHeather, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| February 10, 2005 | /s/ MIKE HEATHER                             |   |
|-------------------|----------------------------------------------|--------|
|              | **Mike Heather****Chief Financial  Officer** |

 

----
#### § 1b.3 Scope of investigations.

The Commission may conduct investigations relating to any matter subject to its jurisdiction.
|   |      1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |      2)  The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  July 11, 2011  |   |      /s/ Karl B. Gemperli        |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                 |   | Karl B. Gemperli                                                                        |   |
|                                 |   | President, Chief Executive                                                              |   |
|                                 |   | Officer (Principal Executive Officer)                                                   |   |
§ 100.21 Alternative dispute resolution. ( a ) If an impasse arises in negotiations between the FBI and the carrier which precludes the execution of a cooperative agreement, the FBI will consider using mediation with the goal of achieving, in a timely fashion, a consensual resolution of all outstanding issues through facilitated negotiations.
( b ) Should the carrier agree to mediation, the costs of that mediation process shall be shared equally by the FBI and the carrier.
( c ) Each mediation shall be governed by a separate mediation agreement prepared by the FBI and the carrier.
Exhibit 23.3

                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-3 No. 33-97054) of Manhattan Bagel Company, Inc. and in the related
Prospectus, in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-15587) of Manhattan
Bagel Company, Inc. and in the related Prospectus, in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-93764) pertaining to the 1994 Stock Option Plan of Manhattan
Bagel Company, Inc., in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-15393)
pertaining to Amendment No. 1 to the Stock Option Agreement made as of April 1,
1996 between Manhattan Bagel Company, Inc. and CRC, Inc., as amended and in the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-15577) pertaining to the 1996 Stock
Option Plan of Manhattan Bagel Company, Inc. of our report dated March 31, 1997,
except for the first paragraph of Note 4 as to which the date is April 15, 1997,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Manhattan Bagel
Company, Inc. and subsidiaries included in this Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for
the year ended December 31, 1996.

Princeton, New Jersey
April 15, 1997
§ 706.203 Outside employment and activity. ( a ) An employee shall not engage in outside employment or other outside activity not compatible with the full and proper discharge of the duties and responsibilities of his Government employment. Incompatible activities include, but are not limited to: ( 1 ) Acceptance of a fee, compensation, gift, payment of expense, or any other thing of monetary value in circumstances wherein acceptance may result in, or create the appearance of, a conflict of interest;
( 2 ) Outside employment or activity which tends to impair his mental or physical capacity to perform the duties and responsibilities of his position in an acceptable manner;
( 3 ) Outside employment or activity which is in violation of a statute, Executive order, or regulation, including applicable State and local statutes and ordinances.
( b ) Employees are encouraged to engage in teaching, lecturing, and writing that is not prohibited by law, Executive Order 11222 of May 11, 1965, as amended by Executive Order 11590 of April 27, 1971, this part or other Council regulations. However, an employee shall not, either for or without compensation, engage in teaching, lecturing, or writing, including teaching, lecturing, or writing for the purpose of the special preparation of a person or class of persons for an examination of the Civil Service Commission or Board of Examiners for the Foreign Service, that depends on information obtained as a result of his Government employment, except when that information has been made available to the general public or will be made available on request, or when the agency head gives written authorization for use of non-public information on the basis that the use is in the public interest.
( c ) An employee shall not receive any salary or anything of monetary value from a private source as compensation for his services to the Government.
( d ) An employee shall not engage in outside work or activity which may be construed by the public to be official acts of the Council, or of a nature closely paralleling the work of the Council.
( e ) An employee who engages in any kind of outside paid employment on a substantially regular basis shall submit to his immediate supervisor a memorandum describing the employment and stating approximately how many hours per week he is so employed. The immediate supervisor shall forward the memorandum through the Director for inclusion in the employee's Official Personnel Folder.
( f ) This section does not preclude an employee from: ( 1 ) Participation in the activities of national or State political parties not proscribed by law;
( 2 ) Participation in the local self-government activities in the community in which he resides to the extent permitted by law; or,
( 3 ) Participation in the affairs of, or acceptance of an award for meritorious public contribution or achievement given by, a charitable, religious, professional, social, fraternal, nonprofit educational, recreational, public service, or civic organization.
EXHIBIT 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated March 11,
1998 on our audits of the consolidated financial statements and our report
dated March 11, 1998 on our audits of the financial statement schedule of
Global Marine Inc. and subsidiaries, as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and
for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995, which reports are
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, into (i) the prospectus
constituting part of the Company's Registration Statements on Form S-8
(Registration Nos. 33-32088, 33-40961 and 33-63326), respectively, for the
Global Marine Inc. 1989 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, (ii) the prospectus
constituting part of the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8
(Registration No. 33-40266) for the Global Marine Savings Incentive Plan,
(iii) the prospectus constituting part of the Company's Registration Statement
on Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-40961) for the Global Marine Inc. 1990
Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, (iv) the prospectus constituting part
of the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 33-57691)
for the Global Marine Inc. 1994 Non-Employee Stock Option and Incentive Plan,
and (v) the prospectus constituting part of the Company's Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 33-58577) for the proposed offering of
up to $75,000,000 of debt securities, preferred stock and/or common stock.



/s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.


Houston, Texas
March 13, 1998
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 8 A0 22 2 . GARY HARRI S v . ROBBI E TUCKER.

Gary Harri s s u ed Ro b bi e Tu ck er i n m ag i st rat e co u r t

. F o ll o wi n g an ad v ers e

ru l i n g, H arri s ap p eal ed t o s u p eri o r co u rt , wh i ch en t ered ju d g m en t i n fav o r o f Tu ck er. Harri s fi l ed a m o t i o n fo r n ew t ri al
, wh i ch t h e s u p eri o r co u rt d en i ed

. Harri s t h en fi l ed

t h i s d i rect ap peal . W e l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n

. Becau s e t he o rd er at i s s u e d i s p o s es of a d e n o v o ap p eal fro m a m ag i s t rat e co u rt
d eci s i o n , Harri s was req u i red t o fo l l o w t he di s cret i o n ary ap p eal p r o c e d ures

. See
OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (a) (1 ); E n g l i s h v. Del b ri d

g e , 2 1 6 Ga. Ap p

. 3 6 6
, 3 6 7 (4 5 4 SE2 d 1 7 5 ) (1 9 9 5). Harri s ’ s fai l ure t o d o s o d ep ri v es u s o f ju ri s d i ct i on o v er th i s ap p eal

. Acco rd in g ly , t h i s ap p eal i s h ereb y DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t
h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. September 06, 2017

09/06/2017
### §63. Acquisition of stock of export trade corporation

Nothing contained in section 18 of this title shall be construed to forbid the acquisition or ownership by any corporation of the whole or any part of the stock or other capital of any corporation organized solely for the purpose of engaging in export trade, and actually engaged solely in such export trade, unless the effect of such acquisition or ownership may be to restrain trade or substantially lessen competition within the United States.

(Apr. 10, 1918, ch. 50, §3, 40 Stat. 517.)
```
**CERTIFICATION**

I, Timothy Novak certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10QSB of Power 3 Medical
   Products, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
   statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
   make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
   statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
   this annual report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
   information included in the this annual report, fairly present in all
   material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
   flows of the registrant as of, and for the periods presented in this annual
   report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
   establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures for the
   registrant and have:
        a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
           material information relating to the registrant, including the
           consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
           entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report
           is being prepared;
        b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
           and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing of this
           annual report; and
        c. Presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
           effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
           evaluation noted preceding;
5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
   our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors:
        a. All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
           controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
           record, process, summarize, and report financial data and have
           identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
           internal controls; and
        b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
           employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
           controls; and
6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
   annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls
   or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
   subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
   corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
   weaknesses.

Date: May 14, 2004

                                                 /s/ Timothy Novak
                                                 By: Timothy Novak
                                                 Title: Chief Executive Officer
```
§ 20.35 Criminal Justice Information Services Advisory Policy Board. ( a ) There is established a CJIS Advisory Policy Board, the purpose of which is to recommend to the FBI Director general policy with respect to the philosophy, concept, and operational principles of various criminal justice information systems managed by the FBI's CJIS Division.
( b ) The Board includes representatives from state and local criminal justice agencies; members of the judicial, prosecutorial, and correctional segments of the criminal justice community; a representative of federal agencies participating in the CJIS systems; and representatives of criminal justice professional associations.
( c ) All members of the Board will be appointed by the FBI Director.
( d ) The Board functions solely as an advisory body in compliance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act. Title 5, United States Code, Appendix 2.
# C_2011080EN.01002001.xml

| 12.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 80/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 80/20

---

Action brought on 29 December 2010 — El Corte Inglés v OHIM — Ruan (B)

(Case T-593/10)

2011/C 80/38

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: El Corte Inglés, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J. L. Rivas Zurdo and E. Seijo Veiguela, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Jian Min Ruan (Mem Martins, Portugal)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 4 October 2010, in Case R 576/2010-2, and declare that, in accordance with Article 8(1)(b) of the CTMR, the opponent’s appeal before OHIM ought to have been upheld and the Opposition Division’s decision to grant in full the complex Community trade mark ‘B’ (No 6.379.721) annulled; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 4 October 2010, in Case R 576/2010-2, and declare that, in accordance with Article 8(1)(b) of the CTMR, the opponent’s appeal before OHIM ought to have been upheld and the Opposition Division’s decision to grant in full the complex Community trade mark ‘B’ (No 6.379.721) annulled;

| — | order the party or parties which oppose this action to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the party or parties which oppose this action to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Jian Min Ruan.

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Red and white figurative mark containing the letter ‘B’ for goods in Class 25.

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: El Corte Inglés, SA.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Figurative mark containing the letter ‘B’ for goods in Class 25.

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition rejected.

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, (1) since there is a likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

1

---
#### § 104.32 Eligibility review.

Any claimant deemed ineligible by the Claims Evaluator may appeal that decision to the Special Master or her designee by filing an eligibility appeal within 30 days on forms created by the office of the Special Master.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Service Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Pamela J. Montpelier, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-B (Item 601(b)(32))
promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Securities Act) and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act). In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not
be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/ PAMELA J. MONTPELIER
|Pamela J. Montpelier    
|Chief Executive Officer 

November 13, 2006
#### § 354.210 Minimum standards for sanitation, facilities, and operating procedures in official plants.

The provisions of §§ 354.210 to 354.247 shall apply with respect to inspection service in all official plants. The table set forth in § 354.247 indicates some of the types of material which may be used in the construction of equipment, utensils, and facilities for use in the plant.