alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 104.81 Limitation on attorney fees. ( a ) *In general* — ( 1 ) *In general.* Notwithstanding any contract, the representative of an individual may not charge, for services rendered in connection with the claim of an individual under this title, including expenses routinely incurred in the course of providing legal services, more than 10 percent of an award paid under this title on such claim. Expenses incurred in connection with the claim of an individual in this title other than those that are routinely incurred in the course of providing legal services may be charged to a claimant only if they have been approved by the Special Master.
( 2 ) *Certification.* In the case of any claim in connection with which services covered by this section were rendered, the representative shall certify his or her compliance with this section and shall provide such information as the Special Master requires to ensure such compliance.
( b ) *Limitation* — ( 1 ) *In general.* Except as provided in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, in the case of an individual who was charged a legal fee in connection with the settlement of a civil action described in section 405(c)(3)(C)(iii) of the Act, the representative who charged such legal fee may not charge any amount for compensation for services rendered in connection with a claim filed by or on behalf of that individual under this title.
( 2 ) *Exception.* If the legal fee charged in connection with the settlement of a civil action described in section 405(c)(3)(C)(iii) of the Act of an individual is less than 10 percent of the aggregate amount of compensation awarded to such individual through such settlement, the representative who charged such legal fee to that individual may charge an amount for compensation for services rendered to the extent that such amount charged is not more than Ten (10) percent of such aggregate amount through the settlement, minus the total amount of all legal fees charged for services rendered in connection with such settlement.
( c ) *Discretion to lower fee.* In the event that the Special Master finds that the fee limit set by paragraph (a) or (b) of this section provides excessive compensation for services rendered in connection with such claim, the Special Master may, in the discretion of the Special Master, award as reasonable compensation for services rendered an amount lesser than that permitted for in paragraph (a) of this section.
### §1106. Employees

The Commission may employ both United States and Canadian citizens.

(Pub. L. 88–363, §7, July 7, 1964, 78 Stat. 300.)
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 679 

To exempt from the calculation of monthly income certain benefits paid 

by the Department of Veterans Affairs and the Department of Defense. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 6, 2019 

Ms. BALDWIN (for herself, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. TESTER, Mr. ISAKSON, Mr. 

JONES, Mr. TILLIS, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Ms. ERNST, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. 

GRASSLEY, Ms. SMITH, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. MORAN, Ms. 

KLOBUCHAR, Mr. COTTON, Ms. DUCKWORTH, Mr. RUBIO, Mrs. SHAHEEN, and Mr. ROUNDS) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To exempt from the calculation of monthly income certain 

benefits paid by the Department of Veterans Affairs 

and the Department of Defense. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Honoring American 

5 Veterans in Extreme Need Act of 2019’’ or the ‘‘HAVEN 

6 Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 679 IS

1 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF CURRENT MONTHLY INCOME. 

2 Section 101(10A) of title 11, United States Code, is 

3 amended by striking subparagraph (B) and inserting the 

4 following: 

5 ‘‘(B)(i) includes any amount paid by any 

6 entity other than the debtor (or in a joint case 

7 the debtor and the debtor’s spouse), on a reg8 ular basis for the household expenses of the 

9 debtor or the debtor’s dependents (and in a 

10 joint case the debtor’s spouse if not otherwise 

11 a dependent); and 

12 ‘‘(ii) excludes— 

13 ‘‘(I) benefits received under the Social 

14 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 301 et seq.); 

15 ‘‘(II) payments to victims of war 

16 crimes or crimes against humanity on ac17 count of their status as victims of such 

18 crimes; 

19 ‘‘(III) payments to victims of inter20 national terrorism or domestic terrorism, 

21 as those terms are defined in section 2331 

22 of title 18, on account of their status as 

23 victims of such terrorism; and 

24 ‘‘(IV) any monthly compensation, pen25 sion, pay, annuity, or allowance paid under 

26 title 10, 37, or 38 in connection with a disVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:45 Mar 15, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S679.IS S679

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•S 679 IS

1 ability, combat-related injury or disability, 

2 or death of a member of the uniformed 

3 services, except that any retired pay ex4 cluded under this subclause shall include 

5 retired pay paid under chapter 61 of title 

6 10 only to the extent that such retired pay 

7 exceeds the amount of retired pay to which 

8 the debtor would otherwise be entitled if 

9 retired under any provision of title 10 

10 other than chapter 61 of that title.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
# C_2012355EN.01000601.xml

| 17.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 355/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 355/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 6 September 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — Daniela Mühlleitner v Ahmad Yusufi, Wadat Yusufi

(Case C-190/11) (1)

1

(Jurisdiction in civil and commercial matters - Jurisdiction over consumer contracts - Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 - Article 15(1)(c) - Possible limitation of that jurisdiction to distance contracts)

2012/C 355/08

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Daniela Mühlleitner

Applicant:

Defendants: Ahmad Yusufi, Wadat Yusufi

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Oberster Gerichtshof — Interpretation of Article 15(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2001 L 12, p. 1) — Jurisdiction over consumer contracts — Possible limitation of that jurisdiction to distance contracts

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 15(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters must be interpreted as not requiring the contract between the consumer and the trader to be concluded at a distance.

---

(1)  OJ C 204, 9.7.2011.

1

---
### §1053. Delegation of responsibility for operation

The Secretary shall assign the responsibility for the operation of the National Fisheries Center and Aquarium and related activities to that branch of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service having as its major activity the rearing and holding of living fishes, including the operation of aquariums.

(Pub. L. 87–758, §3, Oct. 9, 1962, 76 Stat. 753; Pub. L. 93–271, §1(3), Apr. 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 92.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"United States Fish and Wildlife Service" substituted in text for "Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife" on authority of Pub. L. 93–271, §1(3), which is classified to section 742b(c) of this title.
(No. 32566.

#### The People of the State of Illinois, Defendant in Error, *vs.*Augustine B. Gonzalez *et al.,*Plaintiffs in Error.

*Opinion filed March 23, 1953.*

Stephen LEE, of Chicago, for plaintiffs in error.

Ivan A. Elliott, Attorney General, of Springfield, and John GutknECht, State’s Attorney, of Chicago, (John T. Gallagher, Rudolph L. Janega, Arthur F. Manning, and George Cotsirilos, all of Chicago, of counsel,) for the People.

Mr. Justice Schaeper

delivered the opinion of the court:

The defendants, Augustine B. Gonzalez, Robert Gonzalez and George Robles, together with Encarnation Gonzalez and Joseph Luna, were indicted in the criminal court of Cook County for the crime of forcible rape. Defendants pleaded not guilty, were tried by the court without a jury, and found guilty. Augustine B. Gonzalez, Robert Gonzalez, and Robles were sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiary for terms of thirty-five, thirty and fifteen years, respectively. Encarnation Gonzalez, who was sentenced to five years’ imprisonment, prosecuted a separate writ of error and, at the January, 1953, term, the judgment against him was reversed, without remandment. *(People*v. *Gonzales, ante,*page 205.) Augustine B. Gonzalez, Robert Gonzalez, and Robles prosecute the present writ of error.

*409To obtain a reversal, defendants contend that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the judgment of conviction. The evidence has been set forth in our opinion in *People*v. *Gonzalez, ante,*page 205. Repetition would serve no useful purpose. For the reasons assigned in *People*v. *Gonzalez, ante,*page 205, we are of the opinion that the evidence was insufficient to prove the charge of forcible rape against anyone of these three defendants.

The judgment of the criminal court of Cook county is therefore reversed.

*Judgment reversed.*
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTAHQN,,"" 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION t'"1 i:: E[) 

) 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION ) 

) 

OCT 1 5 2015 

HEARING DOCKFT 

Complainant, ) 

) 

v. ) 

) 

) 

SKYWEST AIRLINES, INC. ) 

) 

Respondent. ) 

FAA Case Nos. 2011NM060047 eta!. 

FDMS Nos. FAA-2012-0872 eta!. 

(consolidated) 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

Please take notice that Gerald F. Murphy, Marc L. Warren and Paul Alp of the law firm 

Crowell & Moring LLP hereby enter their appearance as counsel for Respondent SkyWest 

Airlines, Inc. in the above-captioned matter. Please serve all future correspondence, filings and 

submissions accordingly. 

Dated: October 14, 2015 Respectfully Submitted, 

Gerald F. Murphy 

Marc L. Warren 

Paul Alp 

CROWELL & MORING LLP 

1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20004 

Telephone: (202) 624-2500 

Facsimile: (202) 628-5116 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on this 141

h day of October, 2015 tbe original and two (2) copies of 

the foregoing Notice of Appearance was sent via Federal Express, postage prepaid, to: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

600 Independence A venue SW 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2W1 000 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

I hereby certify tbat on this 141

h day of October, 2015, a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing Notice of Appearance was sent via electronic mail and Federal Express, postage 

prepaid, to: 

Dated: October 14,2015 

Casey E. Gardner, Esq. 

Enforcement Division, AGC-300 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

800 Independence Ave., SW 

Washint,>ion, D.C. 20591 

Casey. Gardner@faa. gov 

Counsel for Complainant 

Paul Alp
From: Donald T. Ross

Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 9:11:39 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)

To: AS_Waiver_Requests; Berringer, Bryan; Tiedeman, Jennifer

Cc: David Peterson ( DavPet@ecrinternational.com )

Subject: CAC-041: Notice of Petition for Waiver of ECR International, Inc.

All: On behalf of our client ECR International, Inc., we certify that we have provided a copy of the Notice

of Petition published in the Federal Register on August 6, 2013, via electronic mail, to the

persons/entities in the attached document. The notification was undertaken and completed on August

12, 2013. Thank you.

Don Ross

Donald T. Ross

Special Counsel

Omni Plaza

30 South Pearl Street

Albany, NY 12207

Phone 518 472 1224 Ext. 1255

Fax 518 472 1227

DRoss@phillipslytle.com

www.phillipslytle.com

Download vCard

Circular 230 Disclosure: Under IRS standards of professional practice, certain U.S. federal tax advice must meet with the

requirements as to form and substance. To comply with these standards, we advise you that this communication is not

intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding penalties.

This electronic transmission and any attachments hereto are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it

is addressed and may contain confidential information belonging to the sender which is protected by the attorney-client

privilege. If you have reason to believe that you are not the in tended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure,

copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this electr onic transmission is strictly

prohibited. If you have reason to believe that you have receiv ed this transmission in error, please notify immediately by

return e-mail and delete and destroy this communication.

WARNING : E-mail communications cannot be guaranteed to be time ly, secure, error-free or virus-free. The recipient of

this communication should check this e-mail and each attachment for the presence of viruses. The sender does not accept

any liability for any errors or omissions in the content of this electronic communication which arises as a result of e-mail

transmissio
### §9554. Study and report

#### (a) In general

The Under Secretary, in coordination with relevant leadership of the Agency and relevant individuals outside of the Department of Commerce, shall conduct a study that addresses the ways in which minority business enterprises can meet gaps in the supply chain of the United States, with a particular focus on the supply chain of advanced manufacturing and essential goods and services.

#### (b) Report

Not later than 1 year after November 15, 2021, the Under Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that includes the results of the study conducted under subsection (a), which shall include recommendations regarding the ways in which minority business enterprises can meet gaps in the supply chain of the United States.

(Pub. L. 117–58, div. K, title III, §100304, Nov. 15, 2021, 135 Stat. 1461.)
# C_2012133EN.01000902.xml

| 5.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 133/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 133/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 15 March 2012 (references for a preliminary ruling from the Bundespatentgericht — Germany) — Alfred Strigl v Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt (Case C-90/11), Securvita Gesellschaft zur Entwicklung alternativer Versicherungskonzepte mbH v Öko-Invest Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (C-91/11)

(Joined Cases C-90/11 and C-91/11) (1)

1

(Trade marks - Directive 2008/95/EC - Grounds for refusal or invalidity - Verbal expressions which consist of a word combination and a sequence of letters identical to the initial letters of those words - Distinctive character - Descriptive character - Assessment criteria)

2012/C 133/15

Language of the cases: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundespatentgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Alfred Strigl (C-90/11), Securvita Gesellschaft zur Entwicklung alternativer Versicherungskonzepte mbH (C-91/11)

Applicants:

Defendants: Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt (Case C-90/11), Öko-Invest Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (C-91/11)

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

References for a preliminary ruling — Bundespatentgericht — Interpretation of Article 3(1)(b) and (c) of Directive 2008/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2008 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks (codified version) (OJ 2008 L 299, p. 25) — Distinctive character of a word mark composed of a combination of descriptive words and a sequence of non-descriptive letters that are identical to the initial letters of those words

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 3(1)(b) and (c) of Directive 2008/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2008 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks must be interpreted as meaning that it is applicable to a word mark which consists of the juxtaposition of a descriptive word combination and a letter sequence which is non-descriptive in itself, if the relevant public perceives that sequence as being an abbreviation of that word combination by reason of the fact that it reproduces the first letter of each word of that combination, and that the mark in question, considered as a whole, can thus be understood as a combination of descriptive indications or abbreviations which is therefore devoid of distinctive character.

---

(1)  OJ C 173, 11.6.2011.

1

---
የጀርሞችን ስርጭት ያስቁሙ

cdc.gov/COVID19

CS314915-V March 16, 2020 1:02 PM
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Crescent Moon, Inc., on Form
10-QSB for the period  ending August 31, 2004 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  Robert
Denome,  Principal  Executive  and  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: October 1, 2004
      ---------------------

 /s/ Robert P. Denome
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert P. Denome
President, Principal Executive and Financial Officer


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### SUBCHAPTER V—FUNDING AND ADMINISTRATION

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Subtitle E of title XII of the Food Security Act, comprising this subchapter, was originally enacted by Pub. L. 99–198, title XII, Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1514, and amended by Pub. L. 101–624, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3359; Pub. L. 102–237, Dec. 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 1818; Pub. L. 102–552, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4102; and Pub. L. 104–66, Dec. 21, 1995, 109 Stat. 707. Subtitle E was shown herein, however, as having been added by Pub. L. 104–127, title III, §341, Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1007, without reference to the intervening amendments because of the extensive revision of the subtitle's provisions by Pub. L. 104–127. Subsequent amendments to subtitle E have enacted or repealed and reenacted sections throughout the subtitle.
§ 385.904 Commencement of proceeding (Rule 904). ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the proceeding pursuant to this subpart will be commenced by filing with the Secretary of the Commission either an answer by a petitioner pursuant to Rule 906(b)(1), or a written notice by the Secretary that a petitioner has filed a notice of intent to contest an order reviewable under this subpart, whichever is filed first. The Secretary must file written notice that a petitioner has filed a notice of intent to contest an order reviewable under this subpart within 15 days of the Secretary's receipt of such notice of intent. When the Secretary files the written notice, the Secretary must serve a copy of the contested order upon other participants in the prior proceedings and upon persons denied intervention in the prior proceedings, and must certify to the Commission that such service has been made, stating the names and addresses of persons served.
( b ) The proceeding pursuant to this subpart with respect to an interim remedial order for immediate compliance will be commenced by a petitioner's filing with the Secretary of the Commission, for the Commission, and serving on other participants in the prior proceedings, if any, a notice of petition for review of an interim remedial order for immediate compliance pursuant to 10 CFR 205.199D(i)(1) (interim remedial order of immediate compliance). The Commission will defer consideration of the merits of the order until a final remedial order is issued by the Secretary.
( c ) Upon commencement of a proceeding, the Commission or its designee will designate a presiding officer for the proceeding, and the Commission or its designee will notify participants in the prior proceedings and persons denied intervention in the prior proceedings of such designation.
[Order 225, 47 FR 19022, May 3, 1982, as amended by Order 416-A, 50 FR 36053, Sept. 5, 1985]
### §8550. Improvements to Cooperative Observer Program of National Weather Service

#### (a) In general

The Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere, acting through the National Weather Service, shall improve the Cooperative Observer Program by—

(1) providing support to—

(A) State-coordinated programs relating to the Program; and

(B) States and regions where observations provided through the Program are scarce;

(2) working with State weather service headquarters to increase participation in the Program and to add stations in States and regions described in paragraph (1)(B);

(3) where feasible, ensuring that data streams from stations that have been contributing data to the Program for more than 50 years are maintained and continually staffed by volunteers;

(4) prioritizing the recruitment of new volunteers for the Program;

(5) ensuring that opportunities exist for automated reporting to lessen the burden on volunteers to collect and report data by hand; and

(6) ensuring that integrated reporting is available for qualitative observations that cannot be automated, such as drought conditions, snow observations, and hazardous weather events, to ensure that volunteers in the Program can report and upload observations quickly and easily.

#### (b) Coordination with States and regions

Not less frequently than every 180 days, the National Weather Service shall coordinate with State and regional offices with respect to the status of Cooperative Observer Program stations.

#### (c) Coordination with Federal agencies

The National Weather Service shall coordinate with other Federal agencies, including the Forest Service, the Department of Agriculture, and the United States Geological Survey, to leverage opportunities to grow the Cooperative Observer Program network and to more effectively use existing infrastructure, weather stations, and staff of the Program.

(Pub. L. 115–423, §8, Jan. 7, 2019, 132 Stat. 5461.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

This section was enacted as part of the National Integrated Drought Information System Reauthorization Act of 2018, and not as part of the Weather Research and Forecasting Innovation Act of 2017 which comprises this chapter.