alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,401,740
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  124,600
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,526,340
<PP&E>                                      22,169,138
<DEPRECIATION>                                 341,272
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              27,146,363
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,255,362
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,682
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,611,524
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                27,146,363
<SALES>                                      1,556,815
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,710,710
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  716,627
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               455,226
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                538,857
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            538,857
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   538,857
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .33


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Luna Gold Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Tim Searcy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 12th day of August, 2005.

 
/s/ Tim Searcy
 
Tim Searcy 
 
Chief Executive Officer
### SUBCHAPTER II—NATIONAL PARK SYSTEM RESOURCE INVENTORY AND MANAGEMENT
### SUBCHAPTER XCIX—ROBERT T. STAFFORD WHITE ROCKS NATIONAL RECREATION AREA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0356

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

ROBERT MARTIN ARTHUN,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including October 19, 2022, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 5 2022

10/05/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0356
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7729

JOHN JOSEPH BERLIN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

EDWARD W. MURRAY; M. WATKINS; D. A. BRAXTON;

RANDALL JACKSON; GEORGE P. DOBSON; UNKNOWN

DEFENDANTS 1-100,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District

Judge. (CA-95-376-R)

Submitted: May 15, 1997 Decided: May 28, 1997

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Joseph Berlin, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

John Berlin, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court's

order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under

28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny Berlin's motion for general relief and

dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Berlin

v. Murray, No. CA-95-376-R (W.D. Va. Oct. 28, 1996). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
##### 



EXHIBIT 23.2
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  Form S-8 No. 333-02666 (dated March 25, 1996)Form S-8 No. 333-36315 (dated September 24, 1997) pertaining to The Shaw Group Inc.          
1996 Non-Employee Director Stock Option PlanForm S-8 No. 333-87175 (dated September 16, 1999) pertaining to The Shaw Group Inc.          
1993 Employee Stock Option PlanForm S-8 No. 333-62852 (dated June 12, 2001) pertaining to The Shaw Group Inc.          
1996 Non-Employee Director Stock Option PlanForm S-8 No. 333-62856 (dated June 12, 2001) pertaining to The Shaw Group Inc.          
2001 Employee Incentive Compensation Plan and The Shaw Group Inc. Stone &
          Webster Acquisition Stock Option PlanForm S-8 No. 333-105520 (dated May 23, 2003) pertaining to The Shaw Group Inc.          
2001 Employee Incentive Compensation PlanForm S-8 No. 333-115154 (dated May 4, 2004) pertaining to The Shaw Group Inc.          
2001 Employee Incentive Compensation Plan and The Shaw Group Inc. 1996
          Non-Employee Director Stock Option PlanForm S-8 No. 333-115155 (dated May 4, 2004) pertaining to The Shaw Group Inc.          
401(k) Plan and The Shaw Group Inc. 401(k) Plan for Certain Hourly EmployeesForm S-8 No. 333-132167 (dated March 2, 2006) pertaining to The Shaw Group Inc.         
2001 Employee Incentive Compensation Plan and The Shaw Group Inc.          2005 Non-Employee
Director Stock Incentive Plan (f/k/a 1996 Non-Employee          Director Stock Option Plan)
### §9031. Funding for the DOL Office of Inspector General for oversight of unemployment provisions

There are appropriated, out of moneys in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Labor, $25,000,000 to carry out audits, investigations, and other oversight activities authorized under the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) 1 that are related to the provisions of, and amendments made by, this subtitle, to remain available without fiscal year limitation.

(Pub. L. 116–136, div. A, title II, §2115, Mar. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 334.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Inspector General Act of 1978, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 95–452, Oct. 12, 1978, 92 Stat. 1101, which was set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, and was substantially repealed and restated in chapter 4 (§401 et seq.) of Title 5 by Pub. L. 117–286, §§3(b), 7, Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4206, 4361. For disposition of sections of the Act into chapter 4 of Title 5, see Disposition Table preceding section 101 of Title 5.

This subtitle, referred to in text, is subtitle A (§2101 et seq.) of title II of div. A of Pub. L. 116–136, Mar. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 313, known as the Relief for Workers Affected by Coronavirus Act. For complete classification of subtitle A to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 9001 of this title and Tables.

1 See References in Text note below.
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">NYCHA Public Housing Preservation I, LLC, Petitioner-Landlord-Respondent, <br><br>against<br><br>Stephanie Resto, Respondent-Tenant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Tenant appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Bronx County, (Elizabeth J. Yalin Tao, J.), dated August 20, 2015, which denied her motion to compel landlord to furnish a supplemental bill of particulars in a holdover summary proceeding.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Order (Elizabeth J. Yalin Tao, J.), dated August 20, 2015, modified by directing landlord to furnish a further bill of particulars in response to items 1 and 2 of the demand within 30 days after service of a copy of this order with notice of entry; as modified, order affirmed, without costs.</p><p>Inasmuch as landlord's counsel provided less than unequivocal responses at oral argument to questions relating to the scope of the alleged illegal activities to be proven at trial, landlord is directed to furnish a further bill of particulars responsive to items 1 and 2 of the demand. The remaining items of the demand were either furnished or sought evidentiary matter not within the scope of a bill or particulars (<i>see Colwin v Katz</i>, 90 AD3d 516, 516-517 [2011]).</p><p>Since landlord conceded at oral argument that service of the notice of appeal was timely, the one day delay in the filing of the notice is excused (<i>see</i> CPLR 5520[a]; <i>Messner v Messner</i>, 42 AD2d 889 [1973]).</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur <br>Decision Date: January 25, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Caprock Canyon  Investments,
Inc.,  on Form 10- QSB for the period  ending  March 31,  2002 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "REPORT"),  the
undersigned, B. Stephen Bailey, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Helena

National Forest

Elkhorn

Mountains

Beaverhead/Deerlodge

National Forest

Butte

Boulder

Jefferson

County

Silver Bow

County

Deerlodge

County

Whitehall

Township

8 N.

Township

6 N.

Elk Pa

r k

Anaconda

Mount Haggin

Wildlife

Management Area

Beaverhead/Deerlodge

National Forest

Beaverhead/Deerlodge

National Forest

Humbug

Spires

Whit

eta

il Basin

Township

4 N.

Range 13 W.

Range 11 W. Range 9 W.

Range 7 W. Range 5 W.

Range 3 W.

Range 7 W.

Township

2 S.

Range 11 W.

Range
###### Editorial Note on Part 0

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 0 appear at 73 FR 73 FR 54947, Sept. 24, 2008.

#### § 0.182 Submission of proposed orders to the Office of Legal Counsel.

All orders prepared for the approval or signature of the Attorney General shall be submitted to the Office of Legal Counsel for approval as to form and legality and consistency with existing orders.
### §644a. Small Business Procurement Advisory Council

#### (a) Establishment

There is hereby established an interagency council to be known as the "Small Business Procurement Advisory Council" (hereinafter in this section referred to as the "Council").

#### (b) Duties

The duties of the Council are—

(1) to develop positions on proposed procurement regulations affecting the small business community;

(2) to submit comments reflecting such positions to appropriate regulatory authorities;

(3) to conduct reviews of each Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization established under section 644(k) of this title to determine the compliance of each Office with requirements under such section;

(4) to identify best practices for maximizing small business utilization in Federal contracting that may be implemented by Federal agencies having procurement powers; and

(5) to submit, annually, to the Committee on Small Business of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate a report describing—

(A) the comments submitted under paragraph (2) during the 1-year period ending on the date on which the report is submitted, including any outcomes related to the comments;

(B) the results of reviews conducted under paragraph (3) during such 1-year period; and

(C) best practices identified under paragraph (4) during such 1-year period.

#### (c) Membership

The Council shall be composed of the following members:

(1) The Administrator of the Small Business Administration (or the designee of the Administrator).

(2) The Director of the Minority Business Development Agency.

(3) The head of each Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization in each Federal agency having procurement powers.

#### (d) Chairman

The Council shall be chaired by the Administrator of the Small Business Administration (or the designee of the Administrator).

#### (e) Meetings

The Council shall meet at the call of the chairman as necessary to consider proposed procurement regulations affecting the small business community.

#### (f) Consideration of Council comments

The Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council and other appropriate regulatory authorities shall consider comments submitted in a timely manner pursuant to subsection (b)(2).

(Pub. L. 103–355, title VII, §7104, Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3369; Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title XVI, §1692, Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 2089.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly set out as a note under section 644 of this title.

Section was enacted as part of the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act of 1994, and not as part of the Small Business Act which comprises this chapter.

#### Amendments

2013—Subsec. (b)(3) to (5). Pub. L. 112–239, §1692(a), added pars. (3) to (5).

Subsec. (c)(3). Pub. L. 112–239, §1692(b), struck out "(established under section 644(k) of this title)" after "Utilization".

Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 112–239, §1692(c), inserted "(or the designee of the Administrator)" after "Small Business Administration".
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  SBA Leadership 
-  Aikta Marcoulier 

#   Aikta Marcoulier 

Regional Administrator

            Download high-resolution image          

As Region VIII Administrator, Aikta Marcoulier will oversee SBA programs, offices, and operations in the SBA’s Rocky Mountain region, serving Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming.

Ms. Marcoulier joined the Colorado Small Business Development Center (SBDC) network as the Executive Director of the Pikes Peak office in May 2012. Prior to the SBDC, she was the director of partnership marketing with the Professional Bull Riders, Inc. She is also the program creator and manager of the Colorado SBDC’s Cyber: Cover Your Assets program providing education, training, and one-on-one consulting to small businesses throughout Colorado, and currently serves as a regional coordinator for the NorthStar CMM program. Ms. Marcoulier is involved in the El Pomar Emerging Leaders Program and is an active board member of the Pikes Peak Workforce Development Board, vice-chair of the Better Business Bureau of Southern Colorado, member of the Pikes Peak Community College Business Advisory Board, and president of the Colorado Business Development Foundation. She serves on numerous committees for the Colorado Springs Business Journal and is on the technology and capacity committees for the Colorado SBDC Network. Additionally, she is a member of ROAR (Relationships, Opportunities, Acumen, and Readiness Committee) for the University of Colorado-Colorado Springs (UCCS) College of Business.

She received her MBA in global management from the University of Phoenix and undergraduate degrees in both economics and psychology from the University of Iowa.
For an explanation of the Categories and Fees, please refer to NLCP Program Document #44 and the August 29, 

2019 NLCP Fee Schedule Notice.

 Effective 10/1/19

National Laboratory Certification Program

Initial Certification Payment Schedule

For Laboratories

Fees for the NLCP have been established for each phase of the program and payment must

be made in advance of each event. Checks must be made payable to RTI International.

Application $ 3,000

1st Performance Test 3,000

2nd Performance Test 3,000

3rd Performance Test and 

Initial Inspection

3,000

12,900 15,900

24,900

2nd Inspection (3 month) 12,900

TOTAL COST 37,800

Maintenance Program Payment Schedule

Fee Type $ (Each) $ (Annual)

Category 0 Maintenance Inspection 10,400 20,800

Category 1 Maintenance Inspection 12,900 25,800

Category 2 Maintenance Inspection 18,800 37,600

Category 3 Maintenance Inspection 28,500 57,000

Category 4 Maintenance Inspection 43,700 87,400

Category 5 Maintenance Inspection 43,700 144,400 Category 5 Maintenance Audit 28,500

Category 6 Maintenance Inspection 54,600 188,000 Category 6 Maintenance Audit 39,400

Category 7 Maintenance Inspection 65,500 231,600 Category 7 Maintenance Audit 50,300

Pre-Inspection Remedial Action 1,000

Post-Inspection Remedial Action 3,000

Special Inspection 9,900 – 16,300

Quarterly Maintenance Performance Tests 3,000 12,000

Major PT Remedial Action 3,000

Minor PT Remedial Action 1,000

Laboratory Withdrawal 9,900 – 16,300
### §717t. General penalties

(a) Any person who willfully and knowingly does or causes or suffers to be done any act, matter, or thing in this chapter prohibited or declared to be unlawful, or who willfully and knowingly omits or fails to do any act, matter, or thing in this chapter required to be done, or willfully and knowingly causes or suffers such omission or failure, shall, upon conviction thereof, be punished by a fine of not more than $1,000,000 or by imprisonment for not more than 5 years, or both.

(b) Any person who willfully and knowingly violates any rule, regulation, restriction, condition, or order made or imposed by the Commission under authority of this chapter, shall, in addition to any other penalties provided by law, be punished upon conviction thereof by a fine of not exceeding $50,000 for each and every day during which such offense occurs.

(June 21, 1938, ch. 556, §21, 52 Stat. 833; Pub. L. 109–58, title III, §314(a)(1), Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 690.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2005—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 109–58, §314(a)(1)(A), substituted "$1,000,000" for "$5,000" and "5 years" for "two years".

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 109–58, §314(a)(1)(B), substituted "$50,000" for "$500".
### §4507. Definitions

For purposes of this chapter:

(1) The term "Secretary" means the Secretary of Energy.

(2) The term "subpart V regulations" means the provisions of Subpart V—Special Procedures for Distribution of Refunds (10 CFR 205.280–205.288) and any amendment made after October 21, 1986, and all precedents and decisions under such regulations, but only to the extent that such provisions, precedents, decisions, and amendments are consistent with the provisions of this chapter.

(3) The term "energy conservation programs" means—

(A) the program under part A of the Energy Conservation and Existing Buildings Act of 1976 (42 U.S.C. 6861 and following);

(B) the programs under part D of title III of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (relating to primary and supplemental State energy conservation programs; 42 U.S.C. 6321 and following);

(C) the program under part G of title III of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (relating to energy conservation for schools and hospitals; 42 U.S.C. 6371 and following); and

(D) the program under the National Energy Extension Service Act (42 U.S.C. 7001 and following).

(4) The term "person" includes refiners, retailers, resellers, farmer cooperatives, transportation entities, public and private utilities, school districts, Federal, State, and local governmental entities, farmers, and other individuals and their successors.

(5) The term "State" means each of the several States, the District of Columbia, the commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and any territory or possession of the United States.

(Pub. L. 99–509, title III, §3008, Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 1887.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Energy Conservation and Existing Buildings Act of 1976, referred to in par. (3)(A), probably means the Energy Conservation and Existing Buildings Act of 1976, which is title IV of Pub. L. 94–385, Aug. 14, 1976, 90 Stat. 1150. Part A of the Energy Conservation and Existing Buildings Act of 1976, is classified generally to part A (§6861 et seq.) of subchapter III of chapter 81 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 6801 of Title 42 and Tables.

The Energy Policy and Conservation Act, referred to in par. (3)(B), (C), is Pub. L. 94–163, Dec. 22, 1975, 89 Stat. 871. Parts D and G of title III of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act are classified generally to parts B (§6321 et seq.) and E (§6371 et seq.), respectively, of subchapter III of chapter 77 of Title 42. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 6201 of Title 42 and Tables.

The National Energy Extension Service Act, referred to in par. (3)(D), is title V of Pub. L. 95–39, June 3, 1977, 91 Stat. 191, which was classified principally to chapter 83 (§7001 et seq.) of Title 42 and was repealed by Pub. L. 102–486, title I, §143(a), Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2843. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 7001 of Title 42 and Tables.