alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**_wvotN.~**TlIoI.1OtHlON._cr.u.nv I,. lNtOIIE\J. ,''-

### -~­**~-,­ ~Sf-.ow**  ...--.

### --~ 

# --_

...

# _-

..... 

# -.-**JOE~** . • , _v.-uno CHI'IISTOPHtfI4.IXIOOoS, 0......

### ~-­**...,...1IAI'II'IAStCI.~** 

# _"III9CH,_ utIIiLa,t-. RNCIP
...... -,. DoOoNti. COoP.l'S,
__

_ POfITW,N,**~ ...,...~.-~** **~~­** _OOAICI)I, T_**~AT** .... SIMON, Sf iO H OIRECTOR $No< '-- F oYVU' FI. CHI9 COlJNSfL**~** CAAIPIl[Ll., FlE "IJI!l.IC.O.N Sf""" CWII'Cl'OfI KNIt" K h.LUPS. REPO!IIJCN< CHEF COUNstl

The !-Ionorable Steven Chu Sec ret ary U.S. Department of Energy 1000 In dep endence Ave. SW W as hin gton , D.C. 20 585
De ar Mr. Secr etary: 

# 'l1nitcd**~mtc's ~cmltC**  COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES W AS H I NGTO N. DC 20S10--6150 ENERGY.SENATE

. GOV October 26, 2012

We a re w r itin g to endorse the petition recen tl y s ent to the D ep art men t of Energy (DOE ) from a la rge coalition of elec t ri c mo to r manufacturers, e nergy e ffi ciency ad vocates and ot he rs who have proposed consensus energy conservation sta ndard s for e lectr ic motors ( Doc ket No. EERE·201 O

- BT

- STD0027). We commend t hese s takeholders in DOE 's highly -s uc cessfu l appliance standards program f o r their ini t iative in co min g tog ether to de velo p a conse nsus proposa l that c ould provide a mong the largest energy sav ing s ever achieve d under a DOE efficie nc y rulema k i ng. We urge you to give t hi s proposal careful and serious consideration for adoption in the Departm e nt 's electric mot o r rulem akin g. Strengths of t his peti t ion lie in the early and contin uin g collabo rati o n o f the ma ny s tak e h ol der s w h o deve lope d i t, its s traightforwardness , a n d it s feasibility
. We applaud t he com b ine d efforts o f manufact urers and ene rgy-efficie n cy advocates fo r continuing the traditi on o f collabo rat ion that has built a so li d foundation f or DOE 's appliance s tandard s program a nd that ha s co n t rib uted to the est ab lis hment of s table and progres s ive nati o nal energy efficien cy policies a n d regulations. We e n courage D O E to adopt the principles and content of the petition and beg in saving the most energy possible , as soo n as p ossible, and as feasibly as po ss ible
. We are concerned tha t if DOE seeks energy s avin gs be yond th ose pr oposed by thi s coalition, t ha t the increa se d costs to manufa c turer s a nd end-users, the increased un ce rtainty in the sco pe, levels , and duration of electric motor standards , a nd ine v itable delay s would re s ul t in le ss savings and fewer ov erall benefits to the Nation than would 

### be achieved by adopting this consensus peti tion as soo n a s possible. Tha nk yo u for yo ur con t inued leaders hi p in ac h iev ing the ma ny benefits o f ene rgy efficiency for our Nation, and f o r you r co n s ideration of our views on thi s im portant electr ic mo t or ru le ma kin g. Sincerely,
Exhibit






EXHIBIT 10.60


AMENDMENT 3
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
THIS AMENDMENT 3 (“Amendment 3”) TO THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) by and between LMI Aerospace, Inc., a Missouri corporation, its successors, and assigns (“Corporation”), and BRIAN P. OLSEN (“Employee”) is entered into as of January 6, 2016. 
		
	1.
	The purpose of this Amendment is to revise certain terms and conditions of the Agreement as set forth below.  


		
	2.
	Section 7(B)(ii) of the Agreement is hereby removed and replaced with the following:




For the purposes of this subsection 7(B), “Good Reason” shall mean the occurrence of any of the following after a Change in Control,: (1) an involuntary reduction or diminution of Employee’s title, duties, authority, reporting relationship or responsibilities relative to Employee’s title, duties, authority, reporting relationship or responsibilities in effect immediately prior to such reduction;  (2) a material reduction in Employee’s salary, bonus opportunity or benefits; (3) requiring Employee to relocate his primary work location more than fifty (50) miles from Employee’s then-present location;  (4) Employee is not the President, Engineering Services or comparable segment of the ultimate parent entity of Corporation; (5) Employee does not report  to the Chief Executive Officer of the ultimate parent entity of Corporation.; or  (6) Corporation or any successor thereto otherwise materially breaches this Agreement.
.
		
	3.
	Section 7(B)(iii) of the Agreement is hereby removed in its entirety. 




		
	4.
	Section 20 of the Agreement is hereby removed and replaced with the following:




Survival.  All of those provisions of this Agreement that require performance by either party following termination of Employee’s employment hereunder as well as all provisions contained within Section 7(B) shall survive any termination of this Agreement.


		
	5.
	All other terms of the Agreement remain unchanged.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed and delivered this Agreement as of the date first set forth above.


CORPORATION:                                                           LMI AEROSPACE, INC.




                                                                                    By: /s/ Daniel G. Korte
                                                                                    DANIEL G. KORTE, CEO






EMPLOYEE:                                                          /s/ Brian P. Olsen
                                                                                   BRIAN P. OLSEN
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        To request more information on the proposed project or to obtain a copy of the data collection plans and instruments, contact Heather Bowles, Risk Factor Monitoring and Methods Branch, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, 6130 Executive Blvd MSC 7344, Bethesda, MD 20892-7335 or call non-toll-free number 301-496-7344 or e-mail your request, including your address to:                         *bowleshr@mail.nih.gov.*

*Comments Due Date:*                         Comments regarding this information collection are best assured of having their full effect if received within 60 days of the date of this publication.                    

Dated: March 8, 2011.

Vivian Horovitch-Kelley,

NCI Project Clearance Liaison, National Institutes of Health.

[FR Doc. 2011-5800 Filed 3-11-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

      1.    The Finance Company, a Virginia corporation (100%).

            a.    The Insurance Agency, Inc., a Virginia corporation owned 100%
                  by The Finance Company.

            b.    TFC Receivables Corporation, a Virginia corporation owned 100%
                  by The Finance Company.

            c.    TFC Receivables Corporation 2, a Delaware corporation owned
                  100% by The Finance Company.

            d.    TFC Receivables Corporation III, a Delaware corporation owned
                  100% by The Finance Company.

            e.    TFC Receivables Corporation IV, a Delaware corporation owned
                  100% by The Finance Company.

            f.    TFC Receivables Corporation V, a Delaware corporation owned
                  100% by The Finance Company.

      2.    First Community Finance, Inc., a Virginia corporation (100%).

      3.    Recoveries, Inc., a Virginia corporation (100%).

      4.    PC Acceptance.com, Inc., a Virginia corporation (100%).
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION**     Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the UnitedStates Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350), J. William Freytag, the Chief Executive Officer of Myogen, Inc.(the “Company”), and Joseph L. Turner, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each herebycertifies that, to the best of his knowledge:     **1. **The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006, towhich this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and     **2. **The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the PeriodicReport and results of operations of the Company for the periods covered by the Periodic Report.Dated: November 6, 2006     /s/ J. William Freytag /s/ Joseph L. Turner       J. William Freytag Joseph L. Turner  *Chief Executive Officer* *Chief Financial Officer*  *(Principal Executive Officer)* *(Principal Financial Officer)*       This certification “accompanies” the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed withthe SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under theSecurities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whethermade before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation languagecontained in such filing.
# C_2006331EN.01004602.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/46

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 30 November 2006 — Balabanis and Le Dour

(Case F-77/05) (1)

1

(Officials - Promotion - Article 45 of the Staff Regulations - Amendment to the Staff Regulations - Temporal application - 2004 promotion procedure - Non-inclusion in the list of officials eligible for promotion - Taking into account the probationary period when calculating the minimum length of service of two years )

(2006/C 331/103)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Panagiotis Balabanis (Brussels, Belgium), Olivier Le Dour (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: X. Martin M., S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, E. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and G. Berscheid, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Annulment of the Commission's decision not to include the applicants' names in the list of officials eligible for promotion in the 2004 procedure and of the decisions not to promote them in that procedure.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of 14 September 2004 in which the Commission of the European Communities refused to consider Messrs Balabanis and Le Dour eligible for promotion in the 2004 promotion procedure. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of 14 September 2004 in which the Commission of the European Communities refused to consider Messrs Balabanis and Le Dour eligible for promotion in the 2004 promotion procedure.

| 2. | Annuls the decision of 30 November 2004 in which the Commission of the European Communities did not promote Messrs Balabanis and Le Dour in the 2004 promotion procedure. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Annuls the decision of 30 November 2004 in which the Commission of the European Communities did not promote Messrs Balabanis and Le Dour in the 2004 promotion procedure.

| 3. | Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 271 of 29.10.2005, p. 20 (case initially registered before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities under number T-305/05 and transferred to the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union by order of 15.12.2005).

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 9 (Thursday, January 13, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 2332]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-587]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Florida Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a meeting of the 
Florida Advisory Committee (Committee) to the Commission will convene 
on Wednesday, February 2, 2011, at 1:30 p.m. and adjourn at 
approximately 4 p.m. at Brevard Community College, Building 13, Room 
203, 1519 Clearlake Road, Cocoa, Florida. The purpose of the meeting is 
member orientation and to discuss the Committee's report on migrant 
education.
    The meeting is open to the public and members of the public are 
entitled to submit written comments. Comments must be received in the 
regional office by Friday, March 4, 2011. The address is Southern 
Regional Office, U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 61 Forsyth St., SW., 
Suite 18T40, Atlanta, GA 30303. Persons wishing to e-mail their 
comments may do so to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#57273a3e3936253e3c17222434342579303821"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="95e5f8fcfbf4e7fcfed5e0e6f6f6e7bbf2fae3">[email protected]</span></a>. Persons who desire 
additional information should contact the Southern Regional Office at 
(404) 562-7000 or 800-877-8339 for individuals who are deaf, hearing 
impaired, and/or have speech disabilities. Hearing-impaired persons who 
will attend the meeting and require the services of a sign language 
interpreter should contact the Southern Regional Office at least ten 
(10) working days before the scheduled date of the meeting.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Southern Regional Office as they become available, both before 
and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory 
committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, http://www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Southern Regional Office at the above 
e-mail or street address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Washington, DC, January 10, 2011.
Peter Minarik,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2011-587 Filed 1-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Creation Date Thu Mar  4, 1999  03:23 PM                            Page    1
CMB96A

From: The Chase Manhattan Bank

To:   Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.


                   MONTHLY CERTIFICATEHOLDER'S REPORT
                   ----------------------------------

Due Period 37 Beginning Date                     02/01/1999
Due Period 37 End Date                           02/28/1999
Determination Date                               03/10/1999
Remittance Date                                  03/15/1999


I.    Monthly Principal and Principal Carryover Shortfall to Certificateholders
      (Per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                  $ 11.6631009634

II.   Monthly Interest and Unpaid Interest to Certificateholders
      (Per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                   $ 0.6735162554

III.  Monthly Expenses Summary

      A. Servicing Fee Disbursement                                $ 190,950.12
      B. Cash Collateral Account Expense                                 $ 0.00
      C. Total Expenses paid
         (per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                $ 0.1295223586

IV.   Cash Collateral Account Deposit Amount                             $ 0.00

V.    Outstanding Advance Summary

      A. From Prior Period                                       $ 3,741,279.76
      B. From Current Period                                     $ 3,823,339.25
      C. Change in Amount Between Periods (Lines B - A)             $ 82,059.49

VI.   Pool Factor Information

      A. Certificate Principal Balance                         $ 211,945,653.98
      B. Initial Certificate Balance                         $ 1,474,263,764.33
      C. Pool Factor (Lines A / B)                               0.143763727433

VII.  Available Cash Collateral Account Information for Due Period

      A. Available Cash Collateral Amount                       $ 11,457,007.06
      B. Available Cash Collateral Amount Percentage            5.000000001964%

VIII. Required Cash Collateral Amount

      A. For the Current Collection Period                      $ 11,457,007.06
      B. For the Next Collection Period                         $ 11,056,978.23
# C_2011331EN.01002101.xml

| 12.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/21

---

Order of the General Court of 14 September 2011 — Regione Puglia v Commission

(Case T-223/10) (1)

1

(ERDF - Reduction of financial assistance - Withdrawal of the contested debit note - Cessation of existence of the dispute - No need to adjudicate)

2011/C 331/40

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Regione Puglia (Bari, Italy) (represented by: F. Brunelli and A. Aloia, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Prete and A. Steiblytė, agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for annulment of debit note No 3241001630 of 26 February 2010 concerning Commission Decision C(2009) 10350 of 22 December 2009, incorporating a reduction in the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) assistance granted in application of Commission Decision C(2000) 2349 of 8 August 2000, incorporating approval of the operational programme POR Puglia for the period 2000-2006, on the basis of Objective No 1.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | Each party shall bear its own costs relating to the present proceedings and the Regione Puglia shall bear the costs relating to the interlocutory proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each party shall bear its own costs relating to the present proceedings and the Regione Puglia shall bear the costs relating to the interlocutory proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 179, 3.7.2010.

1

---
### §2435. Other statutory obligations

Nothing in this subchapter affects any specific statutory obligation of any Federal agency (1) to coordinate or consult with any other Federal or State agency or (2) to act, or to refrain from acting, contingent upon the recommendations or certification of any other Federal or State agency.

(Pub. L. 94–136, title III, §305, Nov. 28, 1975, 89 Stat. 741.)
§ 342.0 Applicability. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, rate changes by oil pipelines shall be governed by this part.
( b ) *Exception for the Trans-Alaska Pipeline.* This part shall not apply to the Trans-Alaska Pipeline authorized by the Trans-Alaska Pipeline Authorization Act (43 U.S.C. 1651, *et seq.*) or to any pipeline delivering oil directly or indirectly to the Trans-Alaska Pipeline.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report of GoAmerica, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Donald G. Barnhart, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates
presented and consolidated results of operations of the Company for the periods
presented.

Dated: May 12, 2005

                                       /s/ Donald G. Barnhart
                                       ----------------------
                                       Donald G. Barnhart
                                       Chief Financial Officer


This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
### Part III—Environmental Easement Program
This .zip file contains graphic files (in .png format) of each chart and graph in the Economic Research Service report "Where Do Americans Usually Shop for Food and How Do They Travel To Get There? Initial Findings from the National Household Food Acquisition and Purchase Survey" EIB-138, published in March 2015. The content and context of these files is as of the publication date of the report. After time, the material may not reflect the current ERS program of work, may be outdated, and/or superseded, so please visit the website to obtain the latest information: www.ers.usda.gov. Any reuse of these images should include attribution to "Economic Research Service/USDA."The following inventory lists each of the files in this folder.File name			Description       (Fig01.png)			Figure 1 - Usual Mode of transportation to household’s primary food store by SNAP participation �and income-to-poverty status   (Fig02.png)			Figure 2 - Distance to nearest SNAP-authorized supermarket or supercenter and to primary shopping �store for selected subgroups