alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BASF Corporation

26 Davis Drive

PO Box 13528

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-3528

Tel: (919) 547-2889 Fax: (919) 547-2850

Mobile: (919) 930-1898

Email: chris.hofelt@basf.com

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Pesticide Programs

Document Processing Desk 7504P

Room S-4900,

One Potomac Yard (South Building)

2777 South Crystal Drive

Arlington, VA 22202-4501

Attn: Ms. Jolene Trujillo, Biologist/Chemical Review Manager (PRD)

Subject: BASF’s Poly Mosquito® EPA Registration Number 7969-340

Dear Ms. Trujillo: 

 

I am requesting the voluntary cancellation of Poly Mosquito® (EPA Registration Number 7969-340)

with an existing stocks provision allowing my company’s continued sale and distribution of that product until 

April 16, 2017, which is 18 months measured from the date of this letter. 

 

I understand that notification of receipt of my request will be published in the Federal Register, as required by 

Section 6(f) of FIFRA. 

 

I further understand that such notifications may allow a 180-day period after publication during which EPA 

may not approve or reject the request, but that the registrant may request that the 180-day period be waived. 

I hereby request that the 180-day period be waived, as allowed by Section 6(f)(1)(C)(ii) of FIFRA. I 

understand that the notification will incorporate a 30-day period after publication in which the public may 

comment on the request for voluntary cancellation. I also understand that it is the Agency’s policy to consider 

comments received during the public comment period before making its final determination on such a 

request. 

Please e-mail me at chris.hofelt@basf.com or call me at (919)-547-2889 if further clarification is needed.

Sincerely,

Chris Hofelt, Ph.D. DABT

Crop Protection

150 years

October 16, 2015
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report of GoAmerica, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Daniel R. Luis, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates
presented and consolidated results of operations of the Company for the periods
presented.

Dated: May 12, 2005

                                        /s/ Daniel R. Luis
                                        ------------------
                                        Daniel R. Luis
                                        Chief Executive Officer

This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,760
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,634
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,227
<PP&E>                                         285,488
<DEPRECIATION>                                  88,070
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 213,220
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,531
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           198
<OTHER-SE>                                      90,031
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   213,220
<SALES>                                         76,845
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                76,742
<CGS>                                           26,708
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,708
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               126,641
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,762
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (58,631)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,128
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (42,503)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (42,503)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.15)


</TABLE>
### §6003. Report to Congress

Not later than May 1, 1997, the Administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration shall report to Congress on the effectiveness of the grant program established by section 6001 of this title. The report shall include a list of grant recipients, a summary of the types of programs implemented by the grantees, and any recommendation by the Administrator regarding how the program should be changed in the future.

(Pub. L. 103–267, title II, §204, June 16, 1994, 108 Stat. 727.)
##### 



Exhibit 12(a)(1)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ENACTED BY
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Grupo Industrial
Maseca, S.A. de C.V. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Roberto González Barrera, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



| | /s/ Roberto González Barrera
Name: Roberto González Barrera
Title:   Chief Executive Officer
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: June 30, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §§964 to 966. Repealed. Pub. L. 92–181, title V, §5.26(a), Dec. 10, 1971, 85 Stat. 624

Section 964, acts July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §29, 39 Stat. 381; Ex. Ord. No. 6084, Mar. 27, 1933; July 16, 1933, ch. 98, title VIII, §80(a), 48 Stat. 273; Aug. 18, 1959, Pub. L. 86–168, title I, §104(h), 73 Stat. 387, provided for disposition of land bank association's stock in land bank on declaration of insolvency and appointment of receiver for association.

Section 965, acts July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §29, 39 Stat. 381; Ex. Ord. No. 6084, Mar. 27, 1933; Aug. 18, 1959, Pub. L. 86–168, title I, §104(h), 73 Stat. 387, required written consent from Farm Credit Administration for a land bank, land bank association, or joint stock land bank to go into voluntary liquidation.

Section 966, act July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §29 (par.), as added Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 252, title III, §311, 42 Stat. 1748, and amended Aug. 18, 1959, Pub. L. 86–168, title I, §104(h), 73 Stat. 387, provided for disposition of a land bank association's stock in land bank on voluntary liquidation of an association and for personal liability of members.
### **CHAPTER 101—NATIONAL FISH HABITAT CONSERVATION THROUGH PARTNERSHIPS**

Sec.
8201.
Purpose.
8202.
Definitions.
8203.
National Fish Habitat Board.
8204.
Fish Habitat Partnerships.
8205.
Fish habitat conservation projects.
8206.
Technical and scientific assistance.
8207.
Coordination with States and Indian Tribes.
8208.
Interagency operational plan.
8209.
Accountability and reporting.
8210.
Effect of this chapter.
8211.
Nonapplicability of Federal Advisory Committee Act.
8212.
Funding.
8213.
Prohibition against implementation of regulatory authority by Federal agencies through partnerships.
### §8221. Regulation of credit for reinsurance and reinsurance agreements

#### (a) Credit for reinsurance

If the State of domicile of a ceding insurer is an NAIC-accredited State, or has financial solvency requirements substantially similar to the requirements necessary for NAIC accreditation, and recognizes credit for reinsurance for the insurer's ceded risk, then no other State may deny such credit for reinsurance.

#### (b) Additional preemption of extraterritorial application of State law

In addition to the application of subsection (a), all laws, regulations, provisions, or other actions of a State that is not the domiciliary State of the ceding insurer, except those with respect to taxes and assessments on insurance companies or insurance income, are preempted to the extent that they—

(1) restrict or eliminate the rights of the ceding insurer or the assuming insurer to resolve disputes pursuant to contractual arbitration to the extent such contractual provision is not inconsistent with the provisions of title 9;

(2) require that a certain State's law shall govern the reinsurance contract, disputes arising from the reinsurance contract, or requirements of the reinsurance contract;

(3) attempt to enforce a reinsurance contract on terms different than those set forth in the reinsurance contract, to the extent that the terms are not inconsistent with this subchapter; or

(4) otherwise apply the laws of the State to reinsurance agreements of ceding insurers not domiciled in that State.

(Pub. L. 111–203, title V, §531, July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 1595.)
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Luna Gold Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Marcel de Groot, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 12th day of November, 2004.

 
/s/ Marcel de GrootMarcel de GrootChief Financial Officer
#### THE PEOPLE OF THE TERRITORY OF GUAM v. CHARLES M. UNTEN, JR., Defendant

Criminal No. 98F-76

Superior Court of Guam

October 22, 1976

ABBATE, *Judge*

DECISION

Defendant moved to dismiss Count II of the Indictment by his motion filed 31 August, 1976. In Count II the *354Defendant is charged with Delivery of Controlled Substance in violation of Section 626.10(a)(1) of Guam Public Law 11-149.

On the date of the alleged incident, according to the grand jury transcript, police report and statement of officer Joseph, the Defendant was merely a passenger in the car driven by Joey Garcia, the alleged buyer of a capsule of heroin. Defendant was present when the transaction began at the car and was present when the transaction was later completed at the home of Joey Garcia. However, there was no evidence presented to the grand jury to link the Defendant to the transaction in any capacity other than that of bystander. Defendant was not shown to have uttered any words or gestures, done any acts or otherwise encouraged the “Delivery”. Nor can Defendant be considered an aider or abettor, or conspirator or accomplice on the basis of mere presence at the scene under either California case law, *People v. Villa,*318 P.2d 828, 832, 275 C.A.2d 128 (1957); *Tavine v. Superior Court,*238 C.A.2d 540, 544, 48 Cal. Rptr. 8 (1968) or Federal case law, *United States v. Steward,*451 F.2d 1203 (1971).

This is not a situation where Defendant had exclusive dominion and control over a vehicle in which drugs were found. No evidence was presented to indicate Defendant’s knowledge of his companion’s felonious intent, his participation in the fruits of the “Delivery”, or his aid to Garcia to deliver the controlled substance or escape detection thereafter.

The People did not answer or contest this motion to dismiss which is hereby granted.

Submit order.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements of The Smithfield Companies,
Inc. for the three months ended September 30, 1995, and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                       8,805,436
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,283,219
<ALLOWANCES>                                    59,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,978,919
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,330,101
<PP&E>                                       6,058,465
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,773,927
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,342,691
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,597,280
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                     5,344,833
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,400,578
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,342,691
<SALES>                                      7,870,627
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,878,800
<CGS>                                        4,883,371
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,597,784
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                350,142
<INCOME-TAX>                                   128,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            222,142
<DISCONTINUED>                               1,843,233
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,065,375
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.43
        

</TABLE>
### SUBCHAPTER XLVIII—COOS COUNTY, OREGON
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  SBA Leadership 
-  Francine Hines 

#   Francine Hines

Assistant Inspector General for Management and Operations

Office of Inspector General

            Download high-resolution image          

Francine Hines is the Assistant Inspector General for Management and Operations for the Small Business Administration (SBA), Office of Inspector General (OIG). Ms. Hines is responsible for leading support operations for the OIG’s budget, human resources functions, administrative operations, as well as congressional affairs and communications. 

Ms. Hines has more than 20 years of government and private sector experience leading business and management operations. Throughout her career, Hines has reengineered programs and processes to reduce costs and improve performance. She has also led her teams in resolving human capital problems to promote an inclusive workplace, encourage optimal effort, and continuously develop staff to improve and sustain support operations. 

Prior to joining SBA OIG in March 2023, Hines worked at the United States Department of Education (DOE), Office of Inspector General (OIG) as their Assistant Inspector General for Management Services and before that she served at the Unites States Postal Service (USPS), Office of Inspector General (OIG) in the capacity of Deputy Assistant Inspector General for Mission Support, Director of Budget and Financial Operations and Director of Audit Services. 

Hines has received numerous awards for her work, including a CIGIE Award for Excellence, Distinguished Achievement Awards, and Exceptional Performance Awards. Hines is active in the inspector general community and currently serves as an executive mentor in CIGIE’s mentorship program as well as a speaker, facilitator and supporter of CIGIE’s LIFT (Leading, Inspiring, Fostering Talent) program.

Ms. Hines earned her Bachelor of Arts in Business Administration with a concentration in Accounting from Bowie State University and a Masters in Information Technology from the University of Maryland. Ms. Hines is a Certified Public Accountant, Certified Government Financial Manager, and Certified Lean-Six-Sigma.
# How Can We Help?
#### Parker *v.*Parker.

April 13, 1910.

Alimony. Before Judge Bawlings. Jefferson superior court.

May 13, 1909.

*B. F. Walker*and *Cain &*Hardeman, for plaintiff in error.

*H. C. Roney*and *Phillips &*Phillips, contra.

Holden, J.

1. Upon tlie trial of an action brought by the wife against the husband' for permanent alimony, it is not error to refuse a timely-written request of the defendant to charge the jury as follows: “If you believe from the evidence in this case that Mrs. Parker left her husband and that she left without cause, then I charge you that you would not be authorized to find any alimony for plaintiff. When I say and use in this connection the word ‘cause,’ I mean some unlawful act or unlawful doing.”

(a) A wife is not barred of her right to alimony simply because the conduct of the husband causing her to refuse to live with him did not consist of acts which were unlawful.

2. Where the wife brought suit against the husband for permanent alimony, alleging that he “has abandoned petitioner against her will,” it appearing upon the trial that the husband alone removed to the place at which he and his wife formerly resided, and there being evidence to show that she, at the time of the husband’s removal, was afflicted with an incurable disease, and that at the time her health was and ever since has been such that, for specified reasons, she could not live at such place, it was not error upon such trial to refuse a timely written request of the defendant to charge the jury that the plaintiff could not recover if the husband endeavored to get his wife to remove to such place and she was physically able to do so, but refused, or if she was not at the time physically able to so remove, but afterwards became so and refused to remove to such place and reside with the husband and he was at all times willing to “receive her in his home.”

3. The evidence supported the verdict, and there was no error in refuging a new trial. *Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Juslices concur.*
## Breadcrumb

-  Inicio 
-  Contracting For SBA 

## Section navigation

-  Ubicaciones de la SBA 
-  Gobierno transparente 
-  SBA Newsroom 
-  Work for SBA    -  Employee life 
  -  Jobs at SBA 
  -  Contracting for SBA 
  -  Disaster response jobs at SBA 
-  Organización 
-  Oversight and advocacy 
-  Information in other languages 

Parte o todo el contenido en esta página disponible solo en inglés.

# Contracting for SBA

## Disaster response contracts

When national emergencies or natural disasters occur, supplies and services need to be rushed to affected areas quickly. Small businesses can contract with the federal government to assist in relief and recovery efforts following a major disaster.

### Disaster Response Registry

Government agencies search the Disaster Response Registry of the System for Award Management (SAM) to find contractors that can help respond to disasters. The registry lists contractors that offer debris removal, distribution of supplies, reconstruction, and other disaster or emergency relief supplies and services.

Register your business with SAM to be eligible for disaster relief contracting opportunities. On average, it takes 2-3 days to complete the registration process. Once your registration is active, you'll be added to the Disaster Response Registry.

During registration, you must indicate you want to participate in the Disaster Response Registry and provide the required information on the Disaster Response Information page within the Assertions module.

Local firms affected by a Presidential major disaster or emergency declaration may be given contracting preference.The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) requires potential vendors to complete the Industry Liaison Program (ILP) Vendor Profile form and submit it to fema-industry@fema.dhs.gov.

Contact the Federal Service Desk to get help registering. If you're located in the United States and its outlying areas, you can get free support from your local APEX Accelerator (formerly known as a Procurement Technical Assistance Center), an official resource for government contracting assistance.

### Posting of solicitations

Federal agencies will be posting solicitations for disaster related contracts. Search contract opportunities within SAM using your North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code or use in combination with a keyword such as hurricane or disaster to see what opportunities are being posted right now.

Interested contractors can also pursue state and local opportunities. FEMA lists contact information for each state on its website.

Contact your local SBA district office for assistance with emergency contracting matters.
§ 105.25 Authorized employer's responsibilities. An authorized employer is responsible for: ( a ) Executing and providing to the appropriate state agency the certification to the State required under § 105.23(a) before a State can accept requests on private security guard employees;
( b ) Obtaining the written consent of an employee to submit the employee's fingerprints for purposes of a CHRI check as described herein;
( c ) Submitting an employee's fingerprints and appropriate state and federal fees to the SIB not later than one year after the date the employee's consent is obtained;
( d ) Retaining an employee's written consent to submit his fingerprints for a criminal history record check for a period of no less than three years from the date the consent was last used to request a CHRI check;
( e ) Upon request, providing an employee with confidential access to and a copy of the information provided to the employer by the SIB; and
( f ) Maintaining the confidentiality and security of the information contained in a participating State's notification by: ( 1 ) Storing the information in a secure container located in a limited access office or space;
( 2 ) Limiting access to the information strictly to personnel involved in the employer's personnel and administration functions; and
( 3 ) Establishing internal rules on the handling and dissemination of such information and training personnel with such access on such rules, on the need to safeguard and control the information, and on the consequences of failing to abide by such rules.