alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1672 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# Lff/5)ll-C-1 6 Docket Number: 

# A-98-1 3

Printed 9/30/2008 11:01:00 AM Sheet 45 of 132P. 2 

### A 9 8 1 3 ll.-C-.7 6 From : Sel f <PES 1 RTP/GLAFLAM > To : BILLNAC D <BILLNACD@aol.com > Subject : EP

A Surve y Copie s to : STEV E SHED D <SHEDD.STEVE@epamail.epa.gov> Dat e sent : Fri , 1 3 Ma r 1998 10:58:3 8 -050 0 (EST ) Bil l Allmon d NAC D Bill : Stev e Shed d (ou rEP A lead , a t 919-541-5397 ) aske d m e t o sen d yo u a cop y o f th e EPA' s draf t industr y surve y fo rorgani c liquids . Als o attache d t o thi s messag e i s a lis t o f question s pertinen t t o blending/packaging , whic h w e inten d t o incorporat e int o th e survey . Not e tha t th e surve yi s i n WordPerfect 5 , whil e th e blendin g question s ar e i n WordPerfect 6.1 . W e als o have th e surve y i n Word or , again , w e ca n fa xyo u th e packag e i f necessary . Thi s i s th e versio n o f th e surve y sen t ou t t o th e Tea m i n December ; w e hav e mad e man y change s sinc e then . W e pla n t o sen d a t leas t Sectio n I . Instruction s (whic h wil l b e considerabl y revise d an d expande d t o defin e wh o mus t respond ) t o th e Tea m fo ron e mor e quic k revie w before th e surve y i s sen t ou t t o companie s (thos e o n ou rmailin g list) . Stev e i s intereste d i n discussin g som e o f th e issue s i n th e projec t wit h yo u o n Mondaymornin g (Marc h 16th) . Woul d 9:0 0 wor k ou t fo ryou ? Pleas e le t m e know , an d w e wil l cal l yo u a t tha t time . Thanks , Gre g LaFla m PES , Inc . Attachments : P:\N812\ICR\orgliqu3.wp 5 P:\N812\ICR\blending.wp d 

# r o Gre g LaFla m -1 - Mon , 1 3 Ap r199814:51:1 1P. 3

DRAFT : 2/24/9 8 ORGANI C LIQUID S DISTRIBUTION (NON-GASOLINE ) NESHAP

Question s fo rIndustr

y Surve y - Blending/Compoundin g an d Packaging Facilitie s 1 . Wha

t ar e th e product s fromth e blendin g and/or compounding operations ? 2 . Wha

t ar e the principa

l methods/mechanism s fo

r blending/compounding ? 3 . I s vapor

balancing o

r other vapor emissio n contro l utilize dfo r thes e processes ? 4 . Wha

t ar e the identitie s andannua

l quantitie s o f

liquid s blende dor

compounded ? 5 . D o th e vessel s andcontainer s contai n vapor s o r ar e they vapor-free ? Ho w ar e vapor s i n thes e vessel s handled ? 6 . Doe s the operatio n involv e th e mixing of liquid s into asolutio n (blending) , or doe s chemica l reactio n occu

r t o for mane w produc t

(compounding) ? 7 . I s th e blending/compounding and/or packaging operatio n locate da t or collocate dwit

h a chemica l manufacturing or

petroleumrefining facility ? 8 . Are air

emission s fromthes e operation s currentl y regulated ? Identif

y th e applicabl e rules .



## 1^P. 4

Docke t No . A-98-1 3 Subcategor

y fl- C The enclosure s wit

h thi s documen

t ar e identica l to th e enclosure s wit

h docket itemH-C- /

/



# 3
#### § 41.11 Report of certification.

Each Major and Nonmajor (including those companies classified as nonoperating under Part 101, General Instruction 1(A)(3) of this chapter) public utility or licensee operating on a calendar year and not classified as Class C or Class D prior to January 1, 1984 must file with the Commission a letter or report of the independent accountant certifying approval, together with or within 30 days after the filing of the Annual Report, Form No. 1, covering the subjects and in the form prescribed in the General Instructions of the Annual Report. For such utility or licensee operating on a non-calendar fiscal year, the letter or report of the independent accountant certifying approval must be filed within 150 days of the close of the company's fiscal year; the letter or report must also identify which, if any, of the examined schedules do not conform to the Commission's requirements and shall describe the discrepancies that exist. The Commission will not be bound by a certification of compliance made by an independent accountant pursuant to this paragraph.

[73 FR 58736, Oct. 7, 2008]
zixi-ex1028_295.htm



 

Exhibit 10.28

AMENDMENT NO. 1

TO ZIX CORPORATION STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT

This Amendment No. 1 (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of January 18, 2016, between Richard Spurr (the “Optionee”) and Zix Corporation, a Texas corporation (the “Company”).  Reference is made to that certain Zix Corporation Stock Option Agreement, dated as of January 9, 2008, between the Optionee and the Company (the “Option Agreement”).

1. Amendment.  

(a) The first sentence of Section 4 of the Option Agreement is hereby deleted and replaced with the following:

“In the event the Optionee ceases to be an employee of either the Company or a Subsidiary of the Company due to death, Retirement, Resignation, Disability or termination by the Company for any reason other than “cause” (such five events each being a “Qualified Termination”), this Option may be exercised by the Optionee or his or her estate, personal representative or beneficiary with respect to all options that are vested as of the day of such employment termination (including without limitation, those that vest pursuant to the second sentence of subparagraph 3.a), until the later of (i) at any time within the one-year period commencing on the day next following such employment termination in the case of any Qualified Termination and (ii) at any time until the first anniversary of the date that the Optionee ceases to be a member of the Board (or in any such case in (i) or (ii) above, if shorter, only for the remaining stated term of this Option).”

(b) The following sentence is hereby inserted at the end of the first paragraph in Section 4 of the Option Agreement:

“If the Optionee’s directorship is terminated by a vote of the shareholders or directors for “cause”, this Option shall automatically expire simultaneously with such termination.”

2. Governing Law. This Amendment is governed by and will be construed, interpreted and enforced in accordance with, the laws of the State of Texas (excluding its conflict of law rules) and applicable federal law.

3. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, all of which shall constitute one and the same agreement, and any party hereto may execute this Amendment by signing and delivering one or more counterparts. Delivery of an executed counterpart of this Amendment electronically or by facsimile shall be effective as delivery of an original executed counterpart of this Amendment.

 



 

4. No Other Changes. Other than as provided in this Amendment, the Option Agreement is and shall remain in full force and effect.

[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]

 



 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment on the dates set forth below, to be effective as of the latest date set forth below.

 


	
ZIX CORPORATION

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
By:
	
 
	
/s/ Justin Ferguson

	
 
	
 
	
Justin Ferguson,

	
 
	
 
	
Vice President and General Counsel

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Date:
	
 
	
January 18, 2016




 


	
/s/ Richard Spurr

	
Richard Spurr

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Date:
	
 
	
1/18/2016
# C_2012138EN.01002502.xml

| 12.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/25

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 8 September 2011 — Bovagnet v Commission

(Case F-89/10) (1)

(Civil Service - Officials - Remuneration - Family allowances - Education allowance - Education costs - Definition)

(2012/C 138/50)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: François-Carlos Bovagnet (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: M. Korving, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Martin and B. Eggers, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the defendant’s decision not to reimburse fully the education costs in respect of the applicant’s children.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the European Commission of 17 December 2009 in so far as it refuses to reimburse Mr Bovagnet that part of the education costs paid by him and linked to contribution to the investment funds and working capital of the school that his two children attend; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the European Commission of 17 December 2009 in so far as it refuses to reimburse Mr Bovagnet that part of the education costs paid by him and linked to contribution to the investment funds and working capital of the school that his two children attend;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay Mr Bovagnet the difference between the amount of education allowance granted and that which would result from the calculation of the allowance including the costs incurred for the contribution to the investment funds and the working capital of the school that his two children attend, subject to the ceiling laid down under Article 3 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay Mr Bovagnet the difference between the amount of education allowance granted and that which would result from the calculation of the allowance including the costs incurred for the contribution to the investment funds and the working capital of the school that his two children attend, subject to the ceiling laid down under Article 3 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to pay all the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 328, 4.12.2010, p. 61.

---
EXHIBIT 10(vi)

DEBT SETTLEMENT
AGREEMENT

Agreement made on September 30, 2003
between Shafiq Nazerali with offices located at General Guisan  Quai 36, CH-8002
Zurich, Switzerland, referred to as Creditor and ASP Ventures Corp. with offices located
at 1818-1177 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6E 2K3 referred to as
Debtor.

SECTION ONE

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF
EXISTING OBLIGATION

The parties acknowledge that Debtor
is at present indebted to Creditor in the sum of $45,000 for consulting services rendered
in 2003.

SECTION TWO

AGREEMENT FOR DIFFERENT
METHOD OF PAYMENT

Debtor and Creditor desire and agree,
to provide for the payment of the above-stated indebtedness in accordance with terms and
provisions different from, and in substitution of, the terms and obligations for payment
for same contained in the original consulting services obligation as described in Section
One above.

SECTION THREE

CONSIDERATION

In consideration of the mutual
promises contained in this Agreement, Debtor and Creditor agree as follows:

|a. | Method of Payment: Debtor agrees to pay to Creditor and Creditor agrees to
          accept from Debtor, in full satisfaction of the indebtedness described in
          Section One, above, 2,250,000 shares of Debtors common stock, valued at
          $0.02 a share, as consideration for monies owed to Creditor as a result of
          consulting services provided by Creditor to Debtor.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|b. | Satisfaction: On execution of this Agreement and Debtors board of
          directors resolution authorizing the issuance of 2,250,000 shares of
          Debtors common stock to Creditor provided for in Section Three (a) above,
          the original indebtedness of Debtor to Creditor, as described in Section One,
          above, will be forever cancelled and discharged.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In witness whereof, the parties have
executed this Agreement in Vancouver, British Columbia on the date first mentioned above.

ASP Ventures Corp.

/s/ Ross WilmotBy: Ross
Wilmot, President

Shafiq Nazerali

/s/ Shafiq NazeraliShafiq
Nazerali
Exhibit 99.1
 777 Old Saw Mill River Road

Tarrytown, New York 10591

(914) 789-2800

www.progenics.com 
 
 Contact:
Kathleen Fredriksen
   kfredriksen@progenics.com
 
 
 Positive Data Reported in The Journal of Nuclear Medicine
 Global Phase 2 Imaging Trial of Next Generation Molecule Underway
 123 123 The Journal of Nuclear Medicine
 
 First-in-Man Evaluation of Two High-Affinity PSMA-Avid Small Molecules for Imaging Prostate Cancer." "The approach described in this paper has the potential to assess disease status more accurately. It could help
 
 Separate phase 1 studies were conducted under an exploratory investigational new drug (IND) application to measure the potential effectiveness of the small molecules in diagnosing and staging prostate cancer. In the first study, seven patients with documented prostate cancer were administered doses of 123 123 123
 
 ,
 
 
 
 
 
 Journal of Nuclear Medicine ,
 
  
  
    ® www.progenics.com
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5

<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                            6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                         JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                           JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                      0
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            0
<PP&E>                                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  16,670
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                  750
<OTHER-SE>                                            (17,420)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                0
<SALES>                                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            0
<CGS>                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       16,311
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (16,311)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (16,311)
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                          (16,311)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (0.02)



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
EXHIBIT 27.4:  RESTATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's May 31, 1997 Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0000016918
<NAME> CANANDAIGUA BRANDS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,621
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  160,797
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    290,286
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               471,760
<PP&E>                                         347,829
<DEPRECIATION>                                 106,196
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 981,658
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          216,034
<BONDS>                                        328,969
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           215
<OTHER-SE>                                     366,103
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   981,658
<SALES>                                        306,011
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               306,011
<CGS>                                          225,279
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  225,279
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,479
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,028
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,982
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,046
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,046
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.53
        


</TABLE>
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 09-0075
Post-Focus Draft Revision 8/6/2009

ENGINEER: Hall \ JAS
PV (kg/yr):

Revision Notes / Assessment Overview:

SUBMITTER:

USE:

OTHER USES:

MSDS: Label: No

CRSS :
Chemical Name:
S-H20: 0.00129 g/L @

VP: 1.4E-4 torr @

MW: 211.00 %<500 %<1000 Physical State and Misc CRSS Info:

Consumer Use:

SAT (concerns) (12/02/2008): Migration to groundwater: Slow PBT rating: P2B1T2 Health: 2 Dermal, Drinking Water, Inhalation Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 1 ppb)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2-3D

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: NoINITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 09-0075

Number of Sites/ Location:

Days/yr:

Basis:

Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may coincide with daily releases from the other sources

to the same medium.

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes:

Basis:

Inhalation:

Dermal:INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 09-0075

Number of Sites/ Location:
Days/yr:

Basis:

Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may coincide with daily releases from the other sources

to the same medium.

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes:

Basis:

Inhalation:

Dermal:INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

PMN: 09-0075

Number of Sites/ Location:
Days/yr: 250

Basis:

Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may coincide with daily releases from the other sources

to the same medium.

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: 80,001

Basis:

Inhalation:

Dermal:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

                                                              


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         261,700
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,298,765
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,262,435
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       1,516,306
<DEPRECIATION>                                 483,069
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,363,693
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,768,874
<BONDS>                                      2,213,618
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,283
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,375,826
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,363,693
<SALES>                                      8,716,473
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,452,703
<CGS>                                        4,797,526
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,009,388
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               184,426
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             184,426
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                258,889
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            258,889
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   258,889
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06
        

</TABLE>
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 11

- 00039

- CR

JULIUS MORAN

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

From the 19th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010

- 389

- C1

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Julius Moran attempts to appeal fr om his conviction in January 2011. By letter

dated June 3, 2011, the Clerk of this Court notified Moran that the appeal was subject to

dismissal because it appeared that the trial court’s certificate of right of appeal indicated

that Moran waived his righ t to appeal and had no right to appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

.

26.2(a)(1); 25.2(d). The record contains a written waiver of appeal signed by Moran.

The Clerk also warned Moran that the appeal would be dismissed unless, within 21

days of the date of the let ter, a response was filed showing grounds for continuing theMoran v. State Page 2

appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 44.3. We received a response from Moran; however, it does

not provide grounds for continuing the appeal. Moran’s “Motion in Oppo sition to

Dismissal” is denied.

Acc ordingly, this appeal is dismissed.

AL SCOGGINS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed July 20 , 2011

Do not publish

[CRPM]