alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOTICE OF OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET ACTION 

Date 06/15/2023 

Department of Health and Human Services 

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services 

FOR CERTIFYING OFFICIAL: Karl Mathias 

FOR CLEARANCE OFFICER: Sherrette Funn 

In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, OMB has taken action on your request received 

05/02/2023 

ACTION REQUESTED: Revision of a currently approved collection 

TYPE OF REVIEW REQUESTED: Regular 

ICR REFERENCE NUMBER: 202304-0930-002 

AGENCY ICR TRACKING NUMBER: 

TITLE: Community MH Services BG and SAPT BG Application Guidance and Instructions FY 2024-2025 

LIST OF INFORMATION COLLECTIONS: See next page 

OMB ACTION: Approved with change 

OMB CONTROL NUMBER: 0930-0168 

The agency is required to display the OMB Control Number and inform respondents of its legal significance in 

accordance with 5 CFR 1320.5(b). 

EXPIRATION DATE: 06/30/2026 DISCONTINUE DATE: 

BURDEN: RESPONSES HOURS COSTS 

Previous 119 33,493 0 

New 119 24,613 0 

Difference

Change due to New Statute 0 0 0

Change due to Agency Discretion 0 -8,880 0

Change due to Agency Adjustment 0 0 0

Change due to PRA Violation 0 0 0 

TERMS OF CLEARANCE: OMB is approving this information collection request for a period of three years during which 

time the agency will request approval to extend or revise the collection if the agency seeks to 

continue the information collection activity beyond the period approved under this action. 

OMB Authorizing Official: Dominic J. Mancini 

Deputy Administrator, 

Office Of Information And Regulatory Affairs 
List of ICs 

IC Title Form No. Form Name CFR Citation 

Block Grant Application SAMHSA_BG_Application_20 

24-25 

SAMHSA_BG_Application_20 

24-25
(66 South. 380)

No. 20706.

#### STATE ex rel. HARRIS v. LONG, Criminal Sheriff. In re HARRIS.

(Nov. 4, 1914.)

Habeas corpus by the State, on the relation of Allan J. Harris, against M. J. Long, Criminal Sheriff. Judgment for defendant, and relator applies for certiorari or writ of prohibition.

Judgment of the district court set aside, writ sustained, and relator discharged.

A. Miles Coe and H. M. Wilkinson, both of New Orleans, for applicant. R. G. Pleasant, Atty. Gen., and Jos. E. Generelly, of New Orleans, for respondent. Frank D. Chretien, of New Orleans, in pro. per.

MON-ROE, C. J.

The material facts in this case being similar to those disclosed in 'the case of State ex rel. Francis O. Lanng v. M. J. Long, Criminal Sheriff, 66 South. 377,1 this day decided, and the law applicable thereto being the same:

For the reasons assigned in the case thus mentioned, it is ordered that the judgment of the district court, here made the subject of review, be set aside, that the writ of habeas corpus, issued at the instance of the relator herein, be sustained, and that relator be discharged.

1

Ante, p. *1.*
| 1.   | There occurs a significant change in operating strategy, as determined by the Board of Directors; and |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | Stephen in his sole discretion chooses not to accept, or is not offered, a position with another organization, and Gerber fails to offer Stephen  a comparable position, that is located within a current GSI CT facility and: |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 1.   | Includes responsibility for a business unit with at the time not less than $100MM in sales; |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | Reports to the CEO; and |
|----------------|-------------------------|

| 3.   | Includes a current compensation package no less generous than his package today. |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   Severance Amount: | Amount payable under the Severance Policy for Senior Officers, plus continuation of medical coverage during severance payment period, plus the prorated amount of any bonus earned for the fiscal year in which termination occurs; plus accelerated vesting of all unvested stock options and restricted shares. |
|-------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   Death or Disability:    | Should Stephen die or become disabled prior to May 15, 2011, or the termination of his employment upon a significant change in operating strategy of GSP, as described above, neither he nor his estate will receive the retention payment equal to his annual base salary, nor any benefits or payments under the Severance Policy for Senior Officers. |
|-----------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6948

RICHARD L. MASSEY, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

WILLIAM L. SMITH; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE

STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-94-

1861-L)

Submitted: February 28, 1997 Decided: March 24, 1997

Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard L. Massey, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,

Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended

by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L.

No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the

Appellant's motion for a certificate of probable cause, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. Massey v. Smith, No. CA-94-1861-L (D. Md.

June 6, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 201 4 - 00 92 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 4 - CE - 0 02 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (the “Form 10-K”) of Middleburg Financial Corporation (the “Company”), I, Kathleen J. Chappell, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

(a)    the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(b)           the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company and its subsidiaries as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-K.

 

 
| Date:  March 15, 2007 | /s/ Kathleen J. Chappell               |
|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                  | Kathleen J. Chappell                                                                                         |  
Senior Vice President

 

and Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 

 

  |
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 48 (Friday, March 11, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 13438]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5599]



[[Page 13438]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

PACIFIC NORTHWEST ELECTRIC POWER AND CONSERVATION PLANNING COUNCIL


Amended Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program

AGENCY: Pacific Northwest Electric Power and Conservation Planning 
Council (Northwest Power and Conservation Council), an interstate 
compact agency organized under the authority of the Pacific Northwest 
Electric Power Planning and Conservation Act of 1980, 16 U.S.C. 839 et 
seq. (Northwest Power Act).

ACTION: Notice of final action adopting the management plan elements of 
the Blackfoot River Subbasin Plan into the Council's Columbia River 
Basin Fish and Wildlife Program.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 4(h) of the Northwest Power Act, the 
Council has amended its Columbia River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program 
to add the Blackfoot River Subbasin Plan. The program as amended may be 
found on the Council's Web site at http://www.nwcouncil.org/fw/program 
and then, for the subbasin plan elements and relevant decision 
documents in particular, at http://www.nwcouncil.org/fw/subbasinplanning/Default.htm. Further information and an explanation of 
this amendment process may be found in the documents on that page or by 
contacting the Northwest Power and Conservation Council at (503) 222-
5161 or toll free (800) 452-5161.

Stephen L. Crow,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2011-5599 Filed 3-10-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
#### § 380.8 Preparation of environmental documents.

The preparation of environmental documents, as defined in § 1508.10 of the regulations of the Council (40 CFR 1508.10), on hydroelectric projects, natural gas facilities, and electric transmission facilities in national interest electric transmission corridors is the responsibility of the Commission's Office of Energy Projects, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, (202) 502-8700. Persons interested in status reports or information on environmental impact statements or other elements of the NEPA process, including the studies or other information the Commission may require on these projects, can contact this office.

[Order 689, 71 FR 69471, Dec. 1, 2006, as amended by Order 756, 77 FR 4895, Feb. 1, 2012]
#### DANNY HERNANDEZ, et al., Petitioners-Appellees v. HENRY F. TAITANO, Acting Director of Public Safety, et al., Respondents-Appellants

Civil No. 77-0007-A

District Court of Guam Appellate Division

January 24, 1978

Before DUEÑAS, SMITH and WONG, *District Judges*

PER CURIAM

OPINION

Briefly stated, this appeal results from a mandamus suit against certain officials of the government of Guam, in which they were ordered to pay the additional compensation to firemen provided for by Public Law 12-183. At oral argument, the Deputy Attorney General conceded two issues, leaving two others to be decided by this Court. These two issues are whether attorney’s fees and interest on the judgment were properly awarded.

Pursuant to the Organic Act of Guam, the government of Guam has sovereign immunity which can be waived only by an act of the local legislature:

> The government of Guam . . . with the consent of the Legislature evidenced by enacted law may be sued upon any contract entered *471into with respect to, or any tort committed incident to, the exercise by the government of Guam of its lawful powers. 48 U.S.C. § 1421a.

The appellees have not cited any enactment where the Guam Legislature has consented to a waiver of governmental immunity in a mandamus suit. We also have been unable to find any section in the Guam Code which would provide for an award of interest or attorney’s fees.1 The general rule is that the absence of such statutory authorization precludes the awarding of attorney’s fees and interest. *Aycrigg v. United States,*124 F.Supp. 416 (N.D. Calif., 1954). We are not persuaded that any of the exceptions to the general rule is applicable in this case.

In view of the fait accompli of the payment of the additional compensation in this case, we do not reach the propriety of the mandamus issued in this case and- the payment apparently made pursuant thereto.

The award of attorney’s fees and interest on judgment is hereby removed from the judgment on appeal. Reversed.

1

 Compare Guam Code § 1021 which clearly differentiates between attorneys’ fees and costs.
<PAGE>   1



                                                                     EXHIBIT 24

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned, being a
director or officer, or both, of MFRI, INC., a Delaware corporation (the
"Corporation"), does hereby constitute and appoint DAVID UNGER, HENRY M.
MAUTNER, GENE K. OGILVIE, FATI A. ELGENDY, BRADLEY E. MAUTNER and MICHAEL D.
BENNETT, with full power to each of them to act alone, as the true and lawful
attorneys and agents of the undersigned, with full power of substitution and
resubstitution to each of said attorneys, to execute, file or deliver any and
all instruments and to do any and all acts and things which said attorneys and
agents, or any of them, deem advisable to enable the Corporation to comply with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and any requirements of the
Securities and Exchange Commission in respect thereto, relating to the
Corporation's annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31,
1997, including specifically, but without limitation of the general authority
hereby granted, the power and authority to sign his name as director or
officer, or both, of the Corporation, as indicated below opposite his
signature, to such annual report on Form 10-K or any amendments or papers
supplemental thereto; and each of the undersigned does hereby fully ratify and
confirm all that said attorneys and agents, or any of them, or the substitute
of any of them, shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this Power of
Attorney as of this 30th day of April, 1997.


<TABLE>
<S>                                           <C>
/s/ David Unger                               /s/ Arnold F. Brookstone
--------------------------------------------  --------------------------------
DAVID UNGER, Director, Chairman of the        ARNOLD F. BROOKSTONE, Director
Board of Directors and President              

/s/ Henry M. Mautner                          /s/ Don Gruenberg
--------------------------------------------  --------------------------------
HENRY M. MAUTNER, Director, Vice Chairman     DON GRUENBERG, Director and
of the Board of Directors                     Vice President

                                              
/s/ Gene K. Ogilvie                           /s/ Bradley E. Mautner
--------------------------------------------  --------------------------------
GENE K. OGILVIE, Director and Vice President  BRADLEY E. MAUTNER, Director
                                              and Vice President

/s/ Michael D. Bennett                        /s/ Eugene Miller
--------------------------------------------  --------------------------------
MICHAEL D. BENNETT, Vice President,           EUGENE MILLER, Director
Secretary and Treasurer                       

/s/ Fati A. Elgendy                           /s/ Stephen B. Schwartz
--------------------------------------------  --------------------------------
FATI A. ELGENDY, Director                     STEPHEN B. SCHWARTZ, Director
</TABLE>
#### § 375.310 Delegations during emergency conditions.

For delegations of Commission authority during emergency conditions, see subpart B of part 376 of this chapter.

[45 FR 21217, Apr. 1, 1980. Redesignated by Order 613, 64 FR 73407, Dec. 30, 1999]
# C_2011211EN.01001002.xml

| 16.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/10

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 6 April 2011 — Dr Manfred Beker and Christa Beker v Finanzamt Heilbronn

(Case C-168/11)

2011/C 211/18

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Dr Manfred Beker and Christa Beker

Applicants:

Defendant: Finanzamt Heilbronn

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Does Article 56 EC preclude a rule in a Member State by which — in accordance with treaties concluded in order to avoid double taxation — in the case of taxpayers with unlimited tax liability whose foreign revenue is liable to tax corresponding to national (German) income tax in the State in which the revenue originates, the foreign tax is offset against national (German) income tax levied on revenue from that State in such a way that the national (German) income tax resulting from assessment of the revenue to be taxed — including foreign revenue — is apportioned in the proportion that that foreign revenue bears to total revenue — and hence without taking into account special expenditure or extraordinary costs as costs relating to personal life style and personal and family circumstances?

---
#### § 290.102 Information gathering and filing.

All nonexempt electric utilities must file the data required by section 133(a) of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978, 16 U.S.C. § 2643, with their state regulatory authorities. All nonexempt, nonregulated electric utilities shall, to the extent the data are collected and compiled, make these data publicly available. All nonexempt electric utilities shall file an affidavit with the Commission certifying that the requisite state filing was made. All nonexempt, nonregulated electric utilities shall file an affidavit with the Commission certifying that the data were made publicly available.

[Order 545, 57 FR 53991, Nov. 16, 1992]
UNITED
STATES
 SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington,
D.C. 20549
 
 FORM
8-K
 
 CURRENT
REPORT
 Pursuant
to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 
 Date of
Report (Date of earliest event reported)February 4, 2010
 
 Progenics
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
 (Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
 Delaware
              
              000-23143
              
              13-3379479(State
      or other jurisdiction
                of
      incorporation)
              
              (Commission
                File
      Number)
              
              (IRS
      Employer
                Identification
      No.)777
      Old Saw Mill River Road, Tarrytown, New York
              
              10591(Address
      of principal executive offices)
              
              (Zip
      Code)Registrant's
      telephone number, including area code (914)
      789-2800
 
 Check the
appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously
satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following
provisions (seeGeneral
Instruction A.2. below):
 
 
 oWritten communications
pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
 
 oSoliciting material
pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
  oPre-commencement
communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))
  oPre-commencement
communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))
 
 
  
  Item
8.01. Other Events.
 
 Progenics
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Nasdaq: PGNX) today announced the presentation of
preclinical data on a series of novel compounds, identified as part of its
ongoing oncology drug discovery efforts, that simultaneously blocked two
critical pathways involved in the growth and survival of cancer cells. The data
are being presented at the American Association for Cancer Research conference
on Protein Translation and Cancer in Coronado, CA.
 
 A copy of
Progenics’ press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and the information
contained therein is incorporated by reference into this Item 8.01 of this
Current Report on Form 8-K.
 
 Item
9.01   Financial Statements and Exhibits.
 
 (d)
Exhibits
 
 Exhibit
No.     Description
 
 99.1
              Press
      Release dated February 4, 2010.
 
  
  SIGNATURES
 
 
 Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto
duly authorized.
 
 PROGENICS
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
 By:/s/ ROBERT A.
MCKINNEY
 Robert A.
McKinney
 Chief Financial
Officer, Senior Vice President,
 Finance &
Operations and Treasurer
 
 
 Date:  February
4, 2010