alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012013EN.01001203.xml

| 14.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/12

---

Judgment of the General Court of 24 November 2011 — Saupiquet v Commission

(Case T-131/10) (1)

1

(Customs duty - Repayment of import duties - Canned tuna originating in Thailand - Tariff quota - Opening date - Sunday - Exhaustion of quota - Article 239 of the Community Customs Code - Articles 308a to 308c of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 - Regulation (EC) No 975/2003)

2012/C 13/24

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Saupiquet (Courbevoie, France) (represented by: R. Ledru, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B.-R. Killmann and L. Bouyon, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 10005 final of 16 December 2009 finding that the repayment to the applicant of import duties on cans of tuna originating in Thailand is not justified.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Saupiquet to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Saupiquet to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 148, 5.6.2010.

1

---
### §2141. Revocation of commissions during first five years of commissioned service

The Secretary, under such regulations as he may prescribe, may revoke the commission of any regular officer on active duty who, at the date of such revocation, has had less than five years of continuous service as a commissioned officer in the Regular Coast Guard.

(Added Pub. L. 88–130, §1(10)(C), Sept. 24, 1963, 77 Stat. 183, §281; amended Pub. L. 107–295, title IV, §416(a)(1), Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2121; renumbered §2141, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §112(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4216.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 281 of this title as this section.

2002—Pub. L. 107–295 substituted "five" for "three" in section catchline and text.
<PAGE>   1
                                   Exhibit 11
                               EXECUTIVE RISK INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                   (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              Year Ended December 31,
(In thousands, except per share data)       1996       1995        1994
<S>                                      <C>        <C>        <C>
PRIMARY

Average shares outstanding                 9,815     11,491       5,076
Warrants and options                         694        465         163
Preferred stock conversion                                        4,869
                                         -------    -------    --------
Total shares outstanding                  10,509     11,956      10,108

Net income                               $28,105    $25,286    $ 19,240
Preferred dividends                                              (1,031)
                                         -------    -------    --------
Earnings attributable to common
   stockholders                          $28,105    $25,286    $ 18,209
                                         -------    -------    --------
Per share amount                         $  2.67    $  2.11    $   1.80
                                         =======    =======    ========
FULLY DILUTED

Average shares outstanding                 9,815     11,491      11,188
Warrants and options                         727        487         177
                                         -------    -------    --------
Total shares outstanding                  10,542     11,978      11,365

Net income                               $28,105    $25,286    $ 19,240
                                         -------    -------    --------
Earnings attributable to common
  stockholders                           $28,105    $25,286    $ 19,240
                                         -------    -------    --------
Per share amount                         $  2.67    $  2.11    $   1.69
                                         =======    =======    ========
</TABLE>


                                       4
### §789. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–106, div. D, title XLIII, §4304(b)(2), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 664

Section, Pub. L. 93–275, §33, as added Pub. L. 95–70, §10, July 21, 1977, 91 Stat. 279, related to organizational conflicts of interest of persons contracting to perform research, development, or evaluation activities or technical and management support services.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

For effective date and applicability of repeal, see section 4401 of Pub. L. 104–106, set out as an Effective Date of 1996 Amendment note under section 2220 of Title 10, Armed Forces.
#### § 98.10 Other importations.

Notwithstanding other provisions in this part, the Administrator may in specific cases allow the importation and entry into the United States of embryos other than as provided for in this part under such conditions as the Administrator may prescribe to prevent the introduction into the United States of infectious animal diseases.

[50 FR 43563, Oct. 25, 1985, as amended at 57 FR 29194, July 1, 1992]
### §713a–13. Policies and procedures for minimum acquisition of stocks by Commodity Credit Corporation, encouragement of marketing through private trade channels and procurement of maximum returns in marketplace for producers and Corporation

Congress hereby reconfirms its long-standing policy of favoring the use by governmental agencies of the usual and customary channels, facilities, and arrangements of trade and commerce, and directs the Secretary of Agriculture and the Commodity Credit Corporation to the maximum extent practicable to adopt policies and procedures designed to minimize the acquisition of stocks by the Commodity Credit Corporation, to encourage orderly marketing of farm commodities through private competitive trade channels, both cooperative and noncooperative, and to obtain maximum returns in the marketplace for producers and for the Commodity Credit Corporation.

(Pub. L. 87–703, title IV, §402, Sept. 27, 1962, 76 Stat. 632.)
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JESSICA SALEMAN, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D19-1967

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

________________________________ )

Opinion filed September 25, 2020.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for DeSoto

County; Don T. Hall, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender,

and Clark E. Green, Assistant Public

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, BLACK, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Service Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dana S. Philbrook, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and
Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K (Item 601(b)(32)) promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Securities Act) and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act). In accordance with clause (ii) of
Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.



/s/ DANA S.
PHILBROOK

Dana S. Philbrook

|Chief | Financial Officer
|----- | -----------------



February 13, 2004
----

| 1.   | the      report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,  and |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | the      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the company's financial condition and results of operations as      of the dates and for the periods presented in the financial statements      included in the report. |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      September 28, 2009 | /s/Thomas M.      Sutherland |   |
|-------------------------------|------------------------------|--------|

|        |              Thomas M. Sutherland |
|--------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |              President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Amazing  Investments,  Inc.,
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"),  the undersigned,  B.
Stephen Bailey,  Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my  knowledge  and
belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2011204EN.01001402.xml

| 9.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 204/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 204/14

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 22 April 2011 — Daniela Mühlleitner v Ahmad Yusufi and Wadat Yusufi

(Case C-190/11)

2011/C 204/27

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Daniela Mühlleitner

Appellant:

Respondents: Ahmad Yusufi and Wadat Yusufi

Respondents:

Question referred

Question referred

Does the application of Article 15(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (1) presuppose that the contract between the consumer and the undertaking has been concluded at a distance?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2001 L 12, p. 1.

1

---
----

| Delaware                                                          |   | 000-23143               |   | 13-3379479                       |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|----------------------------------|
| (State or other jurisdictionof incorporation)                     |   | (CommissionFile Number) |   | (IRS EmployerIdentification No.) |
|                                                              |   |                    |   |                             |
| 777 Old Saw Mill River Road, Tarrytown, New York                  |   | 10591                   |
| (Address of principal executive offices)                          |   | (Zip Code)              |
| Registrant's telephone number, including area code (914) 789-2800 |
| o | Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
|---|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| o | Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
|---|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| o | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
|---|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| o | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |
|---|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

| Item 8.01. | Other Events. |
|------------|---------------|
| Item 9.01. | Financial Statements and Exhibits. |
|------------|------------------------------------|
| (d)   | Exhibits |
|-----------------|----------|
| Exhibit No. | Description |
|-------------|-------------|
| 99.1 | Press Release issued June 10, 2013. |
|------|-------------------------------------|

----

|   | PROGENICS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. |
|--------|---------------------------------|
|   | By:                             | /s/ ANGELO W. LOVALLO, JR. |
|   |                            | Angelo W. Lovallo, Jr. |
|   |                            | Vice President, Finance & Treasurer |
|   |                            | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
# C_2013101EN.01001603.xml

| 6.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 101/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 101/16

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2013 — Acron v Council

(Case T-118/10) (1)

1

(Dumping - Imports of solutions of urea and ammonium nitrate originating in Russia - Request for a new exporter review - Normal value - Export price - Articles 1, 2 and 11(4) and (9) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 (now Articles 1, 2 and 11(4) and (9) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009))

2013/C 101/35

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Acron OAO (Veliky Novgorod, Russia) (represented by: B. Evtimov, lawyer, and D. O’Keeffe, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: J.-P. Hix and B. Driessen, Agents, and by G. Berrisch, lawyer, and N. Chesaites, Barrister)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: H. van Vliet and C. Clyne, Agents); and Fertilizers Europe (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: B. O’Connor, Solicitor)

Interveners in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for annulment of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1251/2009 of 18 December 2009 amending Regulation (EC) No 1911/2006 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of solutions of urea and ammonium nitrate originating, inter alia, in Russia (OJ 2009 L 338, p. 5).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Acron OAO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union and by Fertilizers Europe; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Acron OAO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union and by Fertilizers Europe;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 113, 1.5.2010.

1

---
#### §§ 250.1-250.5 [Reserved]
§ 85.4 Interstate movement of livestock. ( a ) Livestock showing clinical evidence of pseudorabies shall not be moved interstate.
( b ) Livestock that have been exposed to an animal showing clinical evidence of pseudorabies shall not be moved interstate within 10 days of such exposure.
( c ) Except as provided in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, livestock other than swine may be moved interstate without restriction under this part.
( d ) Except as provided in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, swine, swine semen, and swine embryos shall be moved interstate only in compliance with the regulations in this part.
[44 FR 10309, Feb. 16, 1979, as amended at 50 FR 47352, Nov. 15, 1985]
SERVE D JUL Y 8 , 201 0

U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC E O FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C I N TH E MATTE RO F 

### Texa s Arm y Nationa l Guar d FA A DOCKE T No . CP09SO001 4 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) DM S No . FAA-2009-104 5 

### ORDE RGRANTIN GI N PAR T AN D DENYIN GI N PAR T MOTIO N FO RDECISIO N Complainan t

Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n ("Complainant" ) ha s file daMotio n for Decisio n ("Motion") . I n suppor t i t state s tha t

Respondent , th e Texa s Arm y Nationa l Guar d("Respondent") , ha s admitte dth e allegation s o f th e Complaint , a s amended. ' Complainan t

als o argue s tha t

it s propose dcivi l penalt y i s justifie dan dproper . Respondent' s answe r

acknowledge s liability . Th e answe r als o oppose s Complainant' s propose dcivi l penalty . Responden t assert s tha t

th e assessmen t

propose dfail s t o accoun t fo r factor s relevan t

t o th e formulatio n o f

th e civi l penalt y amount , i s unwarranted , an d shoul db e rejected . Sinc e n o controvers y exist s concernin g th e substantiv e allegation s of th e Complaint , Complainant' s Motio n i s grante dt o tha t extent . Th e Motio n i s denie da s t o penalty . Th e basi s fo r an damoun t

o f Complainant' s propose dassessmen t i s controverte dan dcanno t b e resolve do n th e pleadings .

' Thi s cas e wa

s originally captioned"Executiv e Office o f the Stat e o f Texas. " A

t Respondent' s reques t {se e Respondent' s Answer) , an dwit hthe acquiescenc e o

f Complainan

t (see Amende

dComplain

t o f Complainant) , i

t wa s changedt

o the curren

t caption .Th e hearing thu s wil l b e limite dt o th e issu e o f penalty . I t

wil l b e schedule db y subsequen t

order . S O ORDERED . 

# T



# C . Richar dC . Goodwi n U.S . Administrativ e La w Judg e Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis tFA A Docke t No . CP09SO001 4 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) SERVIC E LIS T ORIGINA L& ON E COP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON E COP Y Michae l C . Crowley , Respondent' s Counse l Environmenta l Protectio n & Administrativ e La w Division P.O . Bo x 1254 8 Austin , T X 7871 1 TEL : 512-475-420 2 FAX : 512-474-106 2 Geral dA . Ellis , Complainant' s Counse l Southern Region , ASO- 7 Federal Aviatio n Administratio n P.O . Bo x 2063 6 Atlanta , GA 3032 0 TEL : 404-305-520 0 FAX : 404-305-522 3 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Administrativ e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloo r RoomE12-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-213 9 Lega l Assistan t

202-366-512 1 FAX : 20 2 366-753 6

Service was b

y U.S . Mail . Fo

r servic e mperson o

r b y expeditedcourier , us e the following address : Federa l Aviation Administration , 600 Independenc e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington , D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearing Docke t Clerk , AGC-430 .
# C_2011340EN.01001403.xml

| 19.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 340/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/14

---

Order of the President of the Court of 22 June 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main (Germany)) — Condor Flugdienst GmbH v Jürgen Dörschel

(Case C-151/11) (1)

1

2011/C 340/26

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 204, 9.7.2011.

1

---
# C_2012295EN.01001501.xml

| 29.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 295/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 295/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 19 July 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Bruxelles — Belgium) — Pie Optiek v Bureau Gevers, European Registry for Internet Domains

(Case C-376/11) (1)

1

(Internet - .eu Top Level Domain - Regulation (EC) No 874/2004 - Domain names - Phased registration - Article 12(2) - Concept of ‘licensees of prior rights’ - Person authorised by the proprietor of a trade mark to register, in his own name but on behalf of that proprietor, a domain name identical or similar to that trade mark - No authorisation for other uses of the sign as a trade mark)

2012/C 295/24

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Cour d’appel de Bruxelles

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Pie Optiek

Applicant:

Defendants: Bureau Gevers, European Registry for Internet Domains

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Cour d’appel de Bruxelles — Interpretation of Articles 12(2) and 21(1)(a) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 874/2004 of 28 April 2004 laying down public policy rules concerning the implementation and functions of the.eu Top Level Domain and the principles governing registration (OJ 2004 L 162, p. 40) — Interpretation of Article 4(2)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 733/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 April 2002 on the implementation of the.eu Top Level Domain (OJ 2002 L 113, p. 1) — Speculative and abusive registrations — Concept of ‘licensees of prior rights’ — Person authorised by the proprietor of a trade mark to register, in his own name but on behalf of the licensor, a domain name identical or similar to the trade mark, in the absence of any other use of the sign as a trade mark — Name registered without ‘rights or legitimate interest’

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The third subparagraph of Article 12(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 874/2004 of 28 April 2004 laying down public policy rules concerning the implementation and functions of the.eu Top Level Domain and the principles governing registration must be interpreted as meaning that, in a situation where the prior right concerned is a trade mark right, the words ‘licensees of prior rights’ do not refer to a person who has been authorised by the proprietor of the trade mark concerned solely to register, in his own name but on behalf of that proprietor, a domain name identical or similar to that trade mark, but without that person being authorised to use the trade mark commercially in a manner consistent with its functions.

---

(1)  OJ C 298, 8.10.2011.

1

---