alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
APPLICATION OF GULF COAST AIRWAYS, INC.



### BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

Docket No. DOT

- OST

- 2000

- 0249

FORMAL LETTER OF APPLICATION TO AMEND OUR CERTIFICATE
By this order, we are requesting a change in our application to amend our Chief Pilot of Mr. John Fuller to be replaced by Mr. Robert Fal bo.

A formal letter has been submitted to the FAA, Mr. Felix B. Molina, FSDO

- 19, Miramar, Florida by USPO dated August 24, 2010.
We are submitting a copy of this formal order to be entered into the Federal Register. His appointment will be effective as of September 1, 2010, subject to the approval by the Administrator.
Communication with respect to this document should be sent to :
Joel T. Johnson, Jr. Pres GULF COAST AIRWAYS, INC. 526 Terminal Drive Naples Municipal Airport Naples, Florida 34104 Telephone: (239) 403

- 3020 Facsimile: (239) 643

- 2501 Email: joeljjj02@msn.com Application of:

GULF COAST AIRWAYS, INC.

For Authority to Conduct Scheduled Passenger Operations as a Common Air Carrier Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 41738NOTICE: ANY PE RSON WHO WI SHES TO SUPPORT OR OPPOSE THIS APPLICATION SHOULD FILE BEFORE SEPTEMBER 15, 2010 AN ANSWER WITH THE DEPARTMENT AND SERVE A COPY ON ALL PERSONS ON THE ATTACHED SERVICE LIST.

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT THIS APPLICATION BE PROCESS BY THE NONHEARING PROCEDURES UNDER SUBPART B OF THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RULES OF PRACTICE.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Aurizon Mines Ltd. (the Company) is filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, its annual report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report).

I, David P. Hall, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ David P. Hall

______________________David P. Hall
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

March 31, 2010



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Aurizon Mines Ltd. and will be retained by Aurizon Mines Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §7306. Disclosure of information

#### (a) General rule

Except as otherwise provided in this section, a copy of a record, information, or investigation submitted or received by a Team shall be made available to the public on request and at reasonable cost.

#### (b) Exceptions

Subsection (a) does not require the release of—

(1) information described by section 552(b) of title 5 or protected from disclosure by any other law of the United States; or

(2) information described in subsection (a) by the National Institute of Standards and Technology or by a Team until the report required by section 7307 of this title is issued.

#### (c) Protection of voluntary submission of information

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a Team, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, and any agency receiving information from a Team or the National Institute of Standards and Technology, shall not disclose voluntarily provided safety-related information if that information is not directly related to the building failure being investigated and the Director finds that the disclosure of the information would inhibit the voluntary provision of that type of information.

#### (d) Public safety information

A Team and the National Institute of Standards and Technology shall not publicly release any information it receives in the course of an investigation under this chapter if the Director finds that the disclosure of that information might jeopardize public safety.

(Pub. L. 107–231, §7, Oct. 1, 2002, 116 Stat. 1475.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (d), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 107–231, Oct. 1, 2002, 116 Stat. 1471, known as the National Construction Safety Team Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 7301 of this title and Tables.
#### CHARLES UTZ and ROBERTA UTZ, Plaintiffs v. LEE CHUNG SOOK, et al., Defendants

Civil Case No. 155-79

Superior Court of Guam

June 28, 1979

ABBATE, *Presiding Judge*

DECISION AND ORDER

This matter came before this Court, the Honorable Paul J. Abbate presiding, on June 6, 1979, on defendant Lee Chung Sook’s Motion to Dismiss and Plaintiffs’ Motion for default judgment, and on June 27, 1979, on defendant Agusto Paulino’s Motion for summary judgments. Both defendants were represented by Timothy Stewart and the plaintiff was represented by John Dierking.

Defendant’s motion to dismiss is based on an allegation of defective service on defendant Lee Chung Sook by service on her attorney-in-fact, Mr. Paulino. This motion is essentially the same as that raised previously by counsel for defendant by a motion to quash service, and was decided adversely to defendant in the Court’s decision of April 3, 1979. The motion is therefore DENIED.

*619Defendant Paulino has moved for summary judgment in his favor on the grounds that he is not in possession of the premises. However, the affidavit by which he seeks to establish this fact was not served with the motion as required by Rule 6 (d), or ten (10) days in advance of the hearing as required by Rule 56(c). In this case there is no prejudice to the plaintiff for the plaintiff does not seek to contradict the affidavit or allege that due to the shortened time he has been prejudiced in obtaining evidence to contradict the affidavit. (See Wright and Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure Civil Section 2719 (1973).) In fact, both parties have stated that based on such an affidavit they would stipulate to a dismissal, albeit on different terms. In this case either continuing the matter or denying the motion with leave to refile it would only serve to waste judicial resources, and as the plaintiff has claimed no prejudice to his rights, the summary judgment motion as to defendant Paulino is hereby GRANTED.

The final motion outstanding in this matter is plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment. Such a motion is addressed to the discretion of the Court (see Wright and Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure Section 2685 (1973)) and based on the record in this matter the motion is DENIED. The defendant is given ten (10) days from the date of this order to plead further.

SO ORDERED.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Gilman + Ciocia, Inc.
(the "Company") for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003, as amended by this Form
10-K/A, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"),I, Michael P. Ryan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


By: /s/ Michael P. Ryan
    --------------------------
Name: Michael P. Ryan
      Chief Executive Officer

Date: February 6, 2004
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alliance Laundry Systems LLC, Alliance Laundry Corporation and Alliance Laundry Holdings LLC
(the Companies) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas F. LEsperance, Chief Executive Officer of the
Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ THOMAS F. LESPERANCE
|Chief Executive Officer  

August 9, 2010
#### § 154.101 [Reserved]
#### § 367.9110 Account 911, Supervision.

This account must include the cost of labor and expenses incurred in the general direction and supervision of sales activities, except merchandising. Direct supervision of a specific activity, such as demonstrating, selling, or advertising, must be charged to the account wherein the costs of such activity are included (*See* Operating Expense Instructions in § 367.80).
2015 CROP YEAR

NON-IRRIGATED SUNFLOWERS

YIELD EXCLUSION (YE)

Gulf of Mexico

Atlantic

Ocean

Pacific

Ocean

-130° -120° -110° -100° -90° -80° -70°

45° 40° 35° 30° 25°

Coordinate System: Albers

Central Meridian: 96°0'0"W

1st Std Parallel: 20°0'0"N

2nd Std Parallel: 60°0'0"N

Latitude of Origin: 40°0'0"N

Metadata:

County Files - US Census Tiger

Files 2013

YE Coverage - USDA - RMA

December 2014

0 125 250 500 750 1,000

Miles

STATEMENT

The Maps produced represent

the number of years (since 1995)

eligible for yield exclusion for the

2015 crop year.

Document Path: K:\APH\NonIrrigated\Sunflower\2Non-IrrigatedSunflower.mxd

TABLE

Links directly to the state table

(double click)

Number of Years Eligible for

Yield Exclusion (YE)

0 years

1 year

2 to 4 years

5 to 7 years

8 to 10 years

11 to 15 years
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>     0001101176
<NAME>     iLive, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       23277
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                  96558
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            194122
<PP&E>                                      305566
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              665368
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      1951515
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                     15313
<OTHER-SE>                                (2571869)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                665368
<SALES>                                     684352
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            684352
<CGS>                                       198033
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              1346339
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           61700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (724,187)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (724,187)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               (724187)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.05)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 May 10, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Rocco B. CommissoRocco B. CommissoChairman and Chief Executive OfficerBy:
    /s/ Mark E. StephanMark E. StephanExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-20003

Summary Calendar

EDDIE DON JOHNSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

JACQUELINE CHENIER, Supervising Parole Officer; RISSIE OWENS,

Chairman; ROI DICKERSON, Supervising Parole Officer; CHIAZOR

OFOROILE, Hearing Officer; JOSEPH PRESIFKE, Attorney,

Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:10-CV-2881

Before WIENER, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Eddie Don Johnson, Texas prisoner # 364033, proceeding pro se and in

forma pauperis (IFP) appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 complaint as frivolous and for failure to state a claim. See 28 U.S.C.

§§ 1915A(b)(1), 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), (ii). Although Johnson argues the merits of some

of his claims on appeal, he wholly fails to challenge the district court’s reasons

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 29, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-20003 Document: 00511524820 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/29/2011
No. 11-20003

for the dismissal of his claims, specifically that (1) to the extent that Johnson

sought to void his conviction and obtain immediate release from prison, the

claims sounded in habeas and not in civil rights and, thus, would be dismissed

without prejudice for failure to state a viable civil rights claim; (2) Johnson’s

claims for monetary damages for wrongful incarceration were barred by Heck v.

Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994); and (3) Johnson’s § 1983 claims and his claims

asserted under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12132,

were time barred, and, in the alternative, that Johnson had failed to allege a

nonfrivolous ADA claim. By failing to brief any argument challenging the

district court’s reasons for dismissal, Johnson has abandoned the only ground

for appeal. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993);

Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir.

1987). 

Johnson’s appeal is without arguable merit and therefore frivolous. See

Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). Because it is frivolous, it is

dismissed. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Johnson’s motion for the appointment of

counsel is denied. 

The district court’s dismissal of the complaint and this court’s dismissal

of the appeal count as strikes for purposes of § 1915(g). See Adepegba v.

Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996); see also Patton v. Jefferson

Correctional Center, 136 F.3d 458, 462-63 (5th Cir. 1998). Johnson is

CAUTIONED that if he accumulates three strikes under § 1915(g), he will not

be able to proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated

or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious

physical injury. See § 1915(g). 

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED; MOTION

DENIED.

2

Case: 11-20003 Document: 00511524820 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/29/2011
### §2223b. Working group

For the purpose of carrying out section 2223a of this title, the Administrator shall establish a working group which shall, at a minimum, consist of—

(1) program officials from each of—

(A) the Environmental Protection Agency;

(B) the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration;

(C) the Department of Transportation;

(D) the Occupational Safety and Health Administration; and

(E) the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, Department of Justice,

who develop and disseminate hazardous materials identification and response data, and who collect, collate, analyze, and disseminate hazardous materials incident data;

(2) State and local operational officials with emergency response or relevant regulatory responsibilities; and

(3) representatives of companies engaged in the manufacture and processing of chemicals.

(Pub. L. 101–446, §3, Oct. 22, 1990, 104 Stat. 1045; Pub. L. 107–296, title XI, §1112(d), Nov. 25, 2002, 116 Stat. 2276.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Firefighters' Safety Study Act, and not as part of the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act of 1974 which comprises this chapter.

#### Amendments

2002—Par. (1)(E). Pub. L. 107–296 substituted "the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, Department of Justice," for "the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms,".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2002 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 107–296 effective 60 days after Nov. 25, 2002, see section 4 of Pub. L. 107–296, set out as an Effective Date note under section 101 of Title 6, Domestic Security.
# C_2013325EN.01002802.xml

| 9.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 325/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 325/28

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 September 2013 — Zucchetti Rubinetteria v Commission

(Case T-396/10) (1)

1

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Bathroom fittings and fixtures markets of Belgium, Germany, France, Italy, the Netherlands and Austria - Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement - Coordination of price increases and exchange of sensitive business information - Concept of infringement - Single infringement - Relevant market - 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines - Gravity - Multipliers)

2013/C 325/47

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Zucchetti Rubinetteria SpA (Gozzano, Italy) (represented by: M. Condinanzi, P. Ziotti and N. Vasile, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre, A. Antoniadis and L. Malferrari, acting as Agents, assisted initially by F. Ruggeri Laderchi and A. De Matteis, and subsequently by F. Ruggeri Laderchi, lawyers)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2010) 4185 final of 23 June 2010 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/39.092 — Bathroom Fittings and Fixtures), in so far as it concerns the applicant, and, in the alternative, for cancellation or reduction of the fine imposed on it.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Zucchetti Rubinetteria SpA to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Zucchetti Rubinetteria SpA to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 301, 6.11.2010.

1

---
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Rural Development Announces New Telecommunications Program Leadership

WASHINGTON, Nov. 16, 2017 – Assistant to the Secretary for Rural Development Anne Hazlett today 

announced new leadership in Rural Development’s Telecommunications Programs: 

• Chad Parker is now the Assistant Administrator for Telecommunication Programs in the Rural Utilities 

Service. Parker has devoted 26 years to public service with USDA Rural Development, administering 

loan and grant programs that provide funding for manufacturing, business development, housing, 

community facilities and technical assistance for agricultural producers and cooperative development. 

• Laurel Leverrier is now the Deputy Assistant Administrator for Telecommunications Programs in the 

Rural Utilities Service. Leverrier has been with Rural Development for 13 years, serving in various roles 

within the Telecommunications Programs and most recently working as the Assistant Deputy 

Administrator for Rural Development’s Business Programs.

These program leadership changes are effective immediately. USDA Rural Development encourages partners 

and stakeholder groups to reach out to these leaders in their new roles to build on existing partnerships and 

create new ones. 

#

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
§ 385.407 Inspection of documents and other property (Rule 407). ( a ) *Availability.* On request, the presiding officer may order any other participant to: ( 1 ) Permit inspection and copying of any designated documents (including writings, drawings, graphs, charts, photographs, sound recordings, computer tapes or other compilations of data from which information can be obtained) that are not privileged and that are in the possession, custody, or control of the participant to whom the order is directed;
( 2 ) Permit inspection, copying or photographing, testing, or sampling of any tangible thing that is not privileged and that is in the possession, custody, or control of the participant to whom the order is directed; and
( 3 ) Permit entry upon or into designated land, buildings, or other property in the possession, custody, or control of the participant to whom the order is directed for the purpose of inspecting, measuring, surveying, or photographing the property or any activity or operation that is not privileged and that is conducted in or upon the property.
( b ) *Procedures.* A request for inspection of documents or property under this section must describe with reasonable particularity the documents or other property to which access is sought. The request must also specify a reasonable time, place, and manner of making the inspection.
### §262. Duty to observe standard time of zones

Within the respective zones created under the authority of sections 261 to 264 of this title the standard time of the zone shall insofar as practicable (as determined by the Secretary of Transportation) govern the movement of all common carriers engaged in interstate or foreign commerce. In all statutes, orders, rules, and regulations relating to the time of performance of any act by any officer or department of the United States, whether in the legislative, executive, or judicial branches of the Government, or relating to the time within which any rights shall accrue or determine, or within which any act shall or shall not be performed by any person subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, it shall be understood and intended that the time shall insofar as practicable (as determined by the Secretary of Transportation) be the United States standard time of the zone within which the act is to be performed.

(Mar. 19, 1918, ch. 24, §2, 40 Stat. 451; Pub. L. 89–387, §4(b), Apr. 13, 1966, 80 Stat. 108; Pub. L. 97–449, §2(c), Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2439.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1983—Pub. L. 97–449 substituted "Secretary of Transportation" for "Interstate Commerce Commission".

1966—Pub. L. 89–387 inserted "insofar as practicable (as determined by the Interstate Commerce Commission)" in two places and substituted "engaged in interstate or foreign commerce" for "engaged in commerce between the several States or between a State and any one of the Territories of the United States, or between a State or the Territory of Alaska and any one of the insular possessions of the United States or any foreign country".