alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013252EN.01000801.xml

| 31.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 July 2013 — Gosselin Group NV v European Commission, Stichting Administratiekantoor Portielje

(Case C-429/11 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement - International removal services market in Belgium - Direct or indirect fixing of prices, market-sharing and the manipulation of the procedure for the submission of tenders - Classification - Infringement of competition by object - Obligation to state reasons - Guidelines on the effect on trade between Member States - Legal force - Obligation to define the relevant market - Scope - Guidelines on the method of setting fines (2006) - Proportion of the value of sales - Gravity of the infringement - Mitigating circumstances - Obligation to state reasons - Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Article 25 - Limitation period - Repeated infringment)

2013/C 252/11

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Gosselin Group NV (represented by: F. Wijckmans, H. Burez and S. De Keer, avocaten)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: A. Bouquet, F. Ronkes Agerbeek, Agents), Stichting Administratiekantoor Portielje

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 June 2011 in Case T-208/08 Gosselin Group v Commission and Case T-209/08 Stichting Administratiekantoor Portielje, by which the General Court, in Case T-208/08, annulled Commission Decision C(2008) 926 final of 11 March 2008 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38.543 — International Removal Services), in so far as that decision finds that Gosselin Group NV participated in an infringement of Article 81(1) EC from 30 October 1993 to 14 November 1996 and, in Case T-209/08, annulled Decision C(2008) 926, as amended by Decision C(2009) 5810, in so far as it relates to Stichting Administratiekantoor Portielje

Gosselin Group

Commission

Stichting Administratiekantoor Portielje

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Gosselin Group NV to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Gosselin Group NV to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 331, 12.11.2011.

1

---
### §1666i. Assertion by cardholder against card issuer of claims and defenses arising out of credit card transaction; prerequisites; limitation on amount of claims or defenses

#### (a) Claims and defenses assertible

Subject to the limitation contained in subsection (b), a card issuer who has issued a credit card to a cardholder pursuant to an open end consumer credit plan shall be subject to all claims (other than tort claims) and defenses arising out of any transaction in which the credit card is used as a method of payment or extension of credit if (1) the obligor has made a good faith attempt to obtain satisfactory resolution of a disagreement or problem relative to the transaction from the person honoring the credit card; (2) the amount of the initial transaction exceeds $50; and (3) the place where the initial transaction occurred was in the same State as the mailing address previously provided by the cardholder or was within 100 miles from such address, except that the limitations set forth in clauses (2) and (3) with respect to an obligor's right to assert claims and defenses against a card issuer shall not be applicable to any transaction in which the person honoring the credit card (A) is the same person as the card issuer, (B) is controlled by the card issuer, (C) is under direct or indirect common control with the card issuer, (D) is a franchised dealer in the card issuer's products or services, or (E) has obtained the order for such transaction through a mail solicitation made by or participated in by the card issuer in which the cardholder is solicited to enter into such transaction by using the credit card issued by the card issuer.

#### (b) Amount of claims and defenses assertible

The amount of claims or defenses asserted by the cardholder may not exceed the amount of credit outstanding with respect to such transaction at the time the cardholder first notifies the card issuer or the person honoring the credit card of such claim or defense. For the purpose of determining the amount of credit outstanding in the preceding sentence, payments and credits to the cardholder's account are deemed to have been applied, in the order indicated, to the payment of: (1) late charges in the order of their entry to the account; (2) finance charges in order of their entry to the account; and (3) debits to the account other than those set forth above, in the order in which each debit entry to the account was made.

(Pub. L. 90–321, title I, §170, as added Pub. L. 93–495, title III, §306, Oct. 28, 1974, 88 Stat. 1515.)
### §§5611 to 5615. Repealed. Pub. L. 111–314, §6, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3444

Section 5611, Pub. L. 102–555, title I, §101, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4166, related to management of the Landsat Program. See section 60111 of Title 51, National and Commercial Space Programs.

Section 5612, Pub. L. 102–555, title I, §102, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4168, related to procurement of Landsat 7.

Section 5613, Pub. L. 102–555, title I, §103, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4168, related to data policy for Landsat 4 through 6.

Section 5614, Pub. L. 102–555, title I, §104, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4170, related to transfer of Landsat 6 program responsibilities. See section 60112 of Title 51.

Section 5615, Pub. L. 102–555, title I, §105, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4170, related to data policy for Landsat 7. See section 60113 of Title 51.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7277

JAMES B. SKIPWITH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MELISSA E. FRASER, Assistant Public Defender;

NORA J. MILLER, Commonwealth Attorney;

WILLIAM L. WELLONS, Judge,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-04-452-2)

Submitted: October 14, 2004 Decided: October 22, 2004

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James B. Skipwith, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

James B. Skipwith appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28

U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find

that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal

for the reasons stated by the district court. See Skipwith v.

Fraser, No. CA-04-452-2 (E.D. Va. Aug. 18, 2004). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gouverneur Bancorp Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
F. Bennett, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by
                  the Report.


August 11, 2008                    By: /s/ Richard F. Bennett
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Richard F. Bennett
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer


         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code in accordance with Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall
not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be
deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act
of 1933 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
[ARTICLE] 5
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   YEAR
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          MAR-31-2000
[PERIOD-END]                               MAR-31-2000
[CASH]                                             876
[SECURITIES]                                     1,568
[RECEIVABLES]                                      158
[ALLOWANCES]                                         6
[INVENTORY]                                      3,165
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                                 6,326
[PP&E]                                           5,526
[DEPRECIATION]                                   1,463
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                                  11,444
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                            1,794
[BONDS]                                              0
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                          0
[COMMON]                                        10,771
[OTHER-SE]                                       1,655
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                    11,444
[SALES]                                         18,979
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                                18,979
[CGS]                                           11,145
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                   11,145
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                                 9,402
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                     0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                                  63
[INCOME-PRETAX]                                  1,859
[INCOME-TAX]                                       569
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                              1,290
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                                     1,290
[EPS-BASIC]                                        .29
[EPS-DILUTED]                                      .29
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2


                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of SiVault Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Wayne Taylor, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.



Dated:  May 22, 2006                    /s/ Wayne Taylor
                                        -----------------------------
                                        Wayne Taylor
                                        Interim Chief Financial Officer


                                       38
According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number.

The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 0572-0107. The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average I minute per response, including the time for

reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or

any other aspect of this collection of information including suggestions for reducing burden to: USDA-RUS, Attn.: Director, PDRA, 1400 Independence Ave., S.W., STOP, 1522, Washington, DC 20250-1522; and

to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Paperwork Reduction Project (1910-1800), Office of Management and Budget DC 20503.

U.S. Department of Agriculture

Rural Utilities Service

CERTIFICATE

With respect to compliance with the second paragraph of the Rural Electrification Act of

1938, being Title IV of the Work Relief and Public Works Appropriation Act of 1938

(Public Resolution No. 122, 75th Congress, approved June 21, 1938).

Rural Utilities Service Project

1 The undersigned, being, the

in a certain contract No. dated , between the undersigned

2 and ,

does hereby certify that in the performance of the said contract there have been used or furnished no

unmanufactured articles, materials or supplies which have not been mined or produced in the United States or in

any eligible country and no manufactured articles, materials or supplies which have not been manufactured in the

United States or in any eligible country substantially all from articles, materials or supplies mined, produced or

manufactured, as the case may be, in the United States or in any eligible country, except to the extent that

compliance with the second paragraph of the Rural Electrification Act of 1938, being Title IV of the Work Relief and

Public Works Appropriation Act of 1938 (Public Resolution No. 122, 75th Congress, approved June 21, 1938)

has been waived by the Administrator of the Rural Utilities Service. For purposes of this certificate, an ''eligible

country'' is any country that applies with respect to the United States an agreement ensuring reciprocal access for

United States products and services and suppliers to the markets of that country, as determined by the United States

Trade Representative.

By

Date ,20

Insert ''Contractor,'' ''Subcontractor,'' ''Seller,'' Or ''Material Supplier,'' as the case may be.

Insert the name of the RUS Borrower.

United States means United States, its territories and possessions.

A current list of eligible countries may be obtained by contacting RUS.

RUS FORM 213 (Rev. 2-04)

4

,

.

1

2

3

4

,

3
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  About SBA 
-  Open Government 
-  AI Inventory 

## Section navigation

-  SBA locations 
-  Open government    -  FOIA 
  -  Digital SBA 
  -  About the SBA.gov website 
  -  SBA privacy program 
  -  Privacy Act request guide 
  -  Information quality 
  -  SBA guidance 
  -  AI inventory 
  -  Made in America waivers 
-  SBA Newsroom 
-  Work for SBA 
-  Organization 
-  Oversight and advocacy 
-  Information in other languages 

# AI inventory

----

## Content

----

Artificial intelligence (AI) is a tool that can drive the growth of the United States economy and improve the quality of life of all Americans. Executive Order (EO) 14110, Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence, directs federal agencies to list where and how they use AI (use cases).

## SBA's use of artificial intelligence

SBA reviewed our Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA) systems. We did not identify any AI use cases.

We will continue to monitor and update the public AI use case inventory as needed.
# RECEIVED AUG 52015

PART 16DOCKETS UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

WILLIAM ALFRED HICKS, JR. a/k/aBILLY HICKS, Complainant
-againstCITY OF MOUNT AIRY, NORTH CAROLINA; and the COUNTY OF SURRY, NORTH CAROLINA; through the MOUNT AIRY/SURRY COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY, Respondent NOTICE OF ADOPTION OF MOTIONS AND ANSWER Docket No. 16-15-07

Now comes respondent, CITY OF MOUNT AIRY, NORTH CAROLINA, amunicipal corporation, through counsel, to provide notice to the Federal Aviation Administrationinthe above entitled matter that it adopts the Motions and Answer ofthe Mount Airy/Surry County Airport Authority filed or to be filed with the Federal Aviation Administration as its own response.
This the 31" day ofJuly, 2015.

ampbell Law Group, PLLC PO Box 1846 235 E. Independence Blvd Mount Airy, NC 27030 PH: (336) 719-1700 Fax:(336) 719-1703 Hugh@clgnc.com ICERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, HUGH B. CAMPBELL, III, attorney at law, certifY that on July 31,2015, I filed and servedthis NOTICE OFADOPTION OF MOTIONS AND ANSWERby placing the original and three (3) copies thereofto the FAA, and a copy to counsel ofrecord in prepaid first class or express envelopes inthe custody ofthe United States Mail addressed as follows:

FAAPart 16 Docket Clerk AGC-600 Federal AviationAdministration 800 Independence Avenue SW Washington, DC 20591
RandolphM. James Randolph M. James, P.C. PO Box20069 Winston-Salem, NC 27120 Attorney for Complainant

Howard C. Jones, III, Attorney at Law 105 West 4'h Street, Suite 400-E Winston-Salem, NC 27101 Attorney for AirportAuthority

Edwin M. Woltz, Attorney at Law EdwinM. Woltz, Attorney at Law, PLLC 119 Rawley Avenue Mount Airy, North Carolina 27030 Attorney for Surry County

CampbellLaw Group, PLLC PO Box 1846 235 E. Independence Blvd MountAiry, NC 27030 PH: (336) 719-1700 Fax:(336) 719-1703 Hugh@clgnc.com
Exhibit 13.1

STATEMENT OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF  ARCADIS NV  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  § 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of ARCADIS NV (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Harrie L.J. Noy, Chairman of the Executive Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



|Date: June 4, 2004 |  | By: | /s/HARRIE L.J. NOYHarrie L.J. Noy
Chairman of the Executive Board
(Principal Executive Officer)
|------------------ |  | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
### [§2216. Renumbered §3136]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2216, added Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title III, §371(a)(1), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 277, was renumbered section 2216a of this title and subsequently repealed.

Another prior section 2216, added Pub. L. 99–661, div. A, title XIII, §1307(a)(1), Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3980, related to annual reports on budgeting for inflation, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title XIII, §1301(8), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1668.
§ 415.50 General conditions. On and after January 1, 1978, where: ( a ) The flood hazard at the site is clear, present and significant, or the local government having jurisdiction has special flood hazard areas identified pursuant to the National Flood Insurance Act; and
( b ) The site is not subject to an approved state or municipal regulatory system having the same or similar effect on the flood hazard as this regulation, the Commission may condition its approval on any local governmental project under section 3.8 of the Compact upon the adoption and enforcement of flood plain regulations, approved hereunder, by the state or local government having jurisdiction.
EXHIBIT 21.1



              SUBSIDIARIES OF AMERICAN MOBILE SATELLITE CORPORATION

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Name                                             Location of Incorporation
----                                             -------------------------

<S>                                              <C>  
American Mobile Satellite Sales Corporation      State of Delaware

AMSC Acquisition Company, Inc.                   State of Delaware

AMSC ARDIS, Inc.                                 State of Delaware

AMSC ARDIS Acquisition, Inc.                     State of Delaware

AMSC Sales Corporation, Ltd.                     Territory of the Virgin Islands

AMSC Subsidiary Corporation                      State of Delaware and 
                                                    Commonwealth of Virginia

AMSC Subsidiary Corporation of Virginia          Commonwealth of Virginia

ARDIS Company                                    New York General Partnership

Personal Communications Satellite Corporation    State of Delaware

ARDIS Holding Company                            New York General Partnership

Radio Data Network Holding Corporation           State of New York

XM Satellite Radio Inc.                          State of Delaware

XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc.                 State of Delaware



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 596 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 596

 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for direct 
payment to physician assistants under the Medicare program for certain 
            services furnished by such physician assistants.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 28, 2019

  Mr. Barrasso (for himself and Mr. Carper) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for direct 
payment to physician assistants under the Medicare program for certain 
            services furnished by such physician assistants.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DIRECT MEDICARE PAYMENT FOR SERVICES FURNISHED BY PHYSICIAN 
              ASSISTANTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1832(a)(2)(B) of the Social Security Act 
(42 U.S.C. 1395k(a)(2)(B)) is amended by adding at the end the 
following new clause:
                            ``(v) services of a physician assistant but 
                        only if no facility or other provider charges 
                        or is paid any amounts with respect to the 
                        furnishing of such services;''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to services furnished on or after July 1, 2020.
                                 <all>
```