alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 300.1 Applicability and definitions. ( a ) *Applicability.* This part sets forth procedures governing the filing, review and disposition of the rate schedules for the sale or transmission of power and energy established by the Alaska, Bonneville, Southeastern, Southwestern and Western Area Power Administrations. Except as otherwise provided by rule or order, the Commission's general rules of practice and procedure (part 385 of this chapter) will apply to any filings, hearings or other procedures under this part, as applicable.
( b ) *Definitions.* For purposes of this part, the following definitions apply: ( 1 ) *Administrator* means the administrator of a power marketing administration.
( 2 ) *Electric service* means any transmission or sale of electric power and energy, including capacity sales, energy sales, firm power sales, transmission services, or any combination of these services, and the utilization, by means of ownership, contractual arrangements, leasing, or other arrangements, of any facility to provide such sales or services.
( 3 ) *Historic period* means the period commencing with the date of first commercial operation of a powerplant or transmission facility and ending on the last day of the latest year for which actual cost data are available, provided that the period does not end more than 18 months before the date on which the Administrator tenders the rate schedule for filing with the Commission, or such longer period requested by the Deputy Secretary of Energy or Administrator and granted by the Commission.
( 4 ) *Initial capital investment* means the cost of acquisition or construction of a power facility or non-power facility which has been assigned to be repaid from the power revenues, including but not limited to any cost of planning, design, land acquisition, construction, interest during construction, and testing incurred before the date on which the facility becomes operational or revenue-producing.
( 5 ) *Power repayment study or PRS* means a study of the annual repayment of production and transmission investments and other costs through the application of revenues during the repayment period.
( 6 ) *Proposed rate approval period* means the period for which confirmation and approval of the rate schedules is requested. This period must not exceed five years.
( 7 ) *Rate schedule* means a statement describing: ( i ) Type of service to which the rate is to be applied;
( ii ) Rates and charges for, or in connection with, electric service; and
( iii ) Classifications and other provisions which directly affect such rates and charges.
( 8 ) *Rate test or cost evaluation period* means a period, commencing with the end of the historic period, as defined in paragraph (b)(3) of this section, and continuing through the proposed rate approval period as defined in paragraph (b)(6) of this section, during which future estimates of costs and revenues should be modified by the Administrator to reflect changing conditions.
( 9 ) *Replacement* means any substitution of a unit of property with another unit of like character.
[Order 382, 49 FR 25235, June 20, 1984, as amended by Order 323-B, 52 FR 20709, June 3, 1987]
§ 381.200 Poultry products offered for entry, retention in customs custody; delivery under bond; movement prior to inspection; handling; facilities and assistance. ( a ) No slaughtered poultry or other poultry product required by this subpart to be inspected shall be released from customs custody prior to inspection, but such product may be delivered to the consignee, or his agent, prior to inspection, if the consignee shall furnish a bond, in form prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury, conditioned that the product shall be returned, if demanded, to the collector of the port where the same is offered for clearance through the customs.
( b ) Except as provided in paragraph (a) of this section, no product required by this subpart to be inspected shall be moved, prior to inspection, from the port of arrival where first unloaded, and if arriving by water, from the wharf where first unloaded at such port, to any place other than the place designated in accordance with this subpart as the place where the same shall be inspected; and no product shall be conveyed in any manner other than in compliance with this subpart.
( c ) The consignee, or his agent, shall furnish such facilities and shall provide such assistance for handling and marking poultry products offered for entry as the inspector may require.
[37 FR 9706, May 16, 1972, as amended at 51 FR 37710, Oct. 24, 1986; 54 FR 41050, Oct. 5, 1989; 56 FR 65180, Dec. 16, 1991]
### §763. Repealed. Pub. L. 95–91, title VII, §709(a)(1), Aug. 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 607

Section, Pub. L. 93–275, §4, May 7, 1974, 88 Stat. 97, related to officers of Federal Energy Administration.
#### § 4.5 Time for filing protest.

Thirty days after service thereof will be allowed to such licensee within which to file a protest to such reports. If no protest is filed within the time allowed, the Commission will issue such order as may be appropriate. If a protest is filed, a public hearing will be ordered in accordance with subpart E of part 385 of this chapter.

[Order 141, 12 FR 8485, Dec. 19, 1947, as amended by Order 225, 47 FR 19056, May 3, 1982]
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                         Independent Auditors' Consent


The Board of Directors and Stockholders
CellStar Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form
S-8 (Nos. 33-87754, 333-23381 and 333-77415) and Form S-3 (No. 333-41753) of
CellStar Corporation of our report dated January 14, 2000, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of CellStar Corporation and subsidiaries as of
November 30, 1999 and 1998, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended November 30, 1999, and the
related schedule, which report appears in the November 30, 1999 annual report on
Form 10-K of CellStar Corporation.


                                         /S/ KPMG LLP

                                         KPMG LLP


Dallas, Texas
February 25, 2000
### §6403. Referenda

#### (a) Creation of program

The qualified industry organizations may conduct, at their own expense, a referendum among producers and retail marketers for the creation of a Propane Education and Research Council. The Council, if established, shall reimburse the qualified industry organizations for the cost of the referendum accounting and documentation. Such referendum shall be conducted by an independent auditing firm agreed to by the qualified industry organizations. Voting rights in such referendum shall be based on the volume of propane produced or odorized propane sold in the previous calendar year or other representative period. Upon approval of those persons representing two-thirds of the total volume of propane voted in the retail marketer class and two-thirds of all propane voted in the producer class, the Council shall be established, and shall be authorized to levy an assessment on odorized propane in accordance with section 6405 of this title. All persons voting in the referendum shall certify to the independent auditing firm the volume of propane represented by their vote.

#### (b) Termination

On the Council's own initiative, or on petition to the Council by producers and retail marketers representing 35 percent of the volume of propane in each class, the Council shall, at its own expense, hold a referendum, to be conducted by an independent auditing firm selected by the Council, to determine whether the industry favors termination or suspension of the Council. Termination or suspension shall not take effect unless it is approved by persons representing more than one-half of the total volume of odorized propane in the retail marketer class and more than one-half of the total volume of propane in the producer class, or is approved by persons representing more than two-thirds of the total volume of propane in either such class.

(Pub. L. 104–284, §4, Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3371.)
# C_2011030EN.01005001.xml

| 29.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/50

---

Action brought on 22 November 2010 — XXXLutz Marken v OHIM — Meyer Manufacturing (CIRCON)

(Case T-542/10)

()

2011/C 30/89

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: XXXLutz Marken GmbH (Wels, Austria) (represented by: H. Pannen, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Meyer Manufacturing Co. Ltd (Hong Kong, China)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 3 September 2010 in Case R 40/2010-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 3 September 2010 in Case R 40/2010-1;

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant.

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘CIRCON’ for goods in Classes 7, 11 and 21.

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Meyer Manufacturing Company Limited.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Word mark ‘CIRCULON’ for goods in Classes 11 and 21.

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Refusal in part of registration.

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, (1) since there is no likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue, and infringement of Article 76(2)(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, since the Board of Appeal took into account in its decision facts which were not put forward by the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

1

---
May 5, 1977 

STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY 

SOURCE TEST LABORATORY PROCEDURE 3 

HYDROCARBON CONDENSIBLES DETERMINATION 

I. Principle

Hydrocarbon condensibles are extracted from a solution using dichloromethane. 

II. Equipment

1. An analytical balance to weigh evaporating dishes plus or minus 0.1 mg. 

2. Separatory funnel. 

3. Glass container, such as a 500 ml beaker. 

4. 200 ml. evaporating dish. 

5. Desiccator. 

III. Reagents

1. Dichloromethane (CH2C12) Nanograde (or equivalent). 

2. Anhydrous Sodium Sulfate (Na2S04) reagent grade or equivalent dryer. 

3. Dry nitrogen gas. 

IV. Procedure

Determine the sample volume and place in clean glass container. Add 50 ml. of 

dichloromethane and shake or spin for five minutes. Using a separatory funnel, separate 

solvent and water solutions. Repeat extraction two more times with fresh 

dichloromethane. After extraction is completed, remove water from the solvent solution 

by passing it through the sodium sulfate dryer. Transfer the solution to a preweighed 

evaporating dish and dry under dry nitrogen. Desiccate and weigh on an analytical 

balance to constant weight. Run a blank for each series of analysis, or for every five 

samples. Determine the weight of the non-extractables by Source Test Laboratory 

Procedure 2. 

V. Calibration

The balance should be zero before each weighing, and calibrated at least every eighteen 

months with an NBS standard'. 

VI. Calculation

The weight of the condensibles is determined from the difference between the initial and 

final weight of the evaporating dish. 

~
### §1194. Payments

(a) Retention and Distribution by Trustee.—Payments and funds received by the trustee shall be retained by the trustee until confirmation or denial of confirmation of a plan. If a plan is confirmed, the trustee shall distribute any such payment in accordance with the plan. If a plan is not confirmed, the trustee shall return any such payments to the debtor after deducting—

(1) any unpaid claim allowed under section 503(b) of this title;

(2) any payment made for the purpose of providing adequate protection of an interest in property due to the holder of a secured claim; and

(3) any fee owing to the trustee.

(b) Other Plans.—If a plan is confirmed under section 1191(b) of this title, except as otherwise provided in the plan or in the order confirming the plan, the trustee shall make payments to creditors under the plan.

(c) Payments Prior to Confirmation.—Prior to confirmation of a plan, the court, after notice and a hearing, may authorize the trustee to make payments to the holder of a secured claim for the purpose of providing adequate protection of an interest in property.

(Added Pub. L. 116–54, §2(a), Aug. 23, 2019, 133 Stat. 1084.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 180 days after Aug. 23, 2019, see section 5 of Pub. L. 116–54, set out as an Effective Date of 2019 Amendment note under section 101 of this title.
# C_2013086EN.01000401.xml

| 23.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 86/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 86/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 31 January 2013 — European Commission v Kingdom of the Netherlands

(Case C-301/11) (1)

1

(Tax legislation - Transfer of a residence for tax purposes - Freedom of establishment - Article 49 TFEU - Taxation of unrealised capital gains - Immediate exit tax)

2013/C 86/05

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal and W. Roels, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: C.Wissels, J. Langer and M. de Ree, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the defendant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: T. Henze and K. Petersen, acting as Agents), Kingdom of Spain (represented by: A. Rubio González, acting as Agent), Portuguese Republic (représentant: L. Inez Fernandes, acting as Agent)

Interveners in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Interpretation of Article 49 TFEU — Exit tax for undertakings ceasing to have their tax residence in the Netherlands — Taxation of unrealised capital gains in the case of changing the undertaking’s residency, moving its permanent establishment or transferring its shares to another Member State

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by adopting and maintaining in force a national rule providing for the taxation of unrealised capital gains on the transfer of an undertaking or when transferring a company’s registered office or actual head office to another Member State, the Kingdom of the Netherlands has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 49 TFEU; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by adopting and maintaining in force a national rule providing for the taxation of unrealised capital gains on the transfer of an undertaking or when transferring a company’s registered office or actual head office to another Member State, the Kingdom of the Netherlands has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 49 TFEU;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of the Netherlands to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of the Netherlands to pay the costs;

| 3. | Orders the Federal Republic of Germany, the Kingdom of Spain and the Portuguese Republic to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Federal Republic of Germany, the Kingdom of Spain and the Portuguese Republic to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 252, 27.8.2011.

1

---
#### § 131.52 Certificate of concurrence.

(See §§ 35.1 through 35.21 of this chapter.)

This is to certify that__________________

(Name of public utility concurring)

assents to and concurs in the rate schedule (rate schedule supplement) described below, which the____________________________ (Name of public utility filing rate schedule) has filed, and hereby files this certificate of concurrence in lieu of the filing of the rate schedule (rate schedule supplement) specified.

(Here give exact description of rate schedule or supplement, including F.E.R.C. number)

(Name of public utility)

By

(Title)

Dated __________________ 19____.

[Order 141, 12 FR 8591, Dec. 19, 1947, as amended by Order 271, 28 FR 11404, Oct. 24, 1963; Order 541, 57 FR 21734, May 22, 1992; Order 714, 73 FR 57533, Oct. 3, 2008]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1982

ROBERT S. WILLIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES; DIRECTOR OF FBI; PATIENT FIRST; PORTSMOUTH FAMILY PRACTICE; FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-03-127-2) Submitted: February 19, 2004 Decided: February 24, 2004 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert S. Willis, Appellant Pro Se. George Maralan Kelley, III, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia; Kristina Helen Vaquera, TROUTMAN SANDERS, L.L.P., Norfolk, Virginia; Paul R. Schmidt, HUFF, POOLE & MAHONEY, P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia; John Wayne Brown, Hugh Edward Black, III, Chesapeake, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Robert S. Willis appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. SeeWillis v. Attorney Gen. of the United States , No. CA-03-127-2 (E.D. Va. July 3, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 56.2 Cooperation with States. ( a ) The Administrator has been delegated the authority to cooperate with Cooperating State Agencies in the eradication of H5/H7 LPAI. This cooperation may include, but is not necessarily limited to, the following activities: ( 1 ) Payment to Cooperating State Agencies for surveillance and monitoring associated with poultry that have been infected with or exposed to H5/H7 LPAI;
( 2 ) Transfer of vaccine for H5/H7 LPAI to Cooperating State Agencies if provided for in the initial State response and containment plan approved by APHIS under § 56.10; and
( 3 ) Payment for vaccine administration by Cooperating State Agencies, if provided for in the initial State response and containment plan approved by APHIS under § 56.10.
( b ) ( 1 ) Any payment made to a State or an Official State Agency for the activities listed in paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(3) of this section must be made through a cooperative agreement between the Cooperating State Agency and APHIS. The payment for which the Cooperating State Agency is eligible will be determined in the cooperative agreement. ( i ) For any Cooperating State Agency that participates in the National Poultry Improvement Plan diagnostic surveillance program for H5/H7 LPAI, as described in § 146.14 of this chapter, and has an initial State response and containment plan for H5/H7 LPAI that is approved by APHIS, as described in § 56.10 of this part, the cooperative agreement will provide that the Cooperating State Agency is eligible for payment of 100 percent of the costs of surveillance and monitoring and 100 percent of the costs of vaccine administration, as determined in the cooperative agreement.
( ii ) For any Cooperating State Agency that does not meet the criteria in paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section, the cooperative agreement will provide that the Cooperating State Agency is eligible for payment of 25 percent of the costs of surveillance and monitoring and 25 percent of the costs of vaccine administration, as determined in the cooperative agreement.
( 2 ) Transfer of vaccine under paragraph (a)(2) of this section must be accomplished through a cooperative agreement between the Cooperating State Agency and APHIS.
( c ) Cooperating State Agencies will be responsible for making the determination to request Federal assistance under this part in the event of an outbreak of H5/H7 LPAI.
[71 FR 56323, Sept. 26, 2006, as amended at 75 FR 10656, Mar. 9, 2010]
### Part A—Regulatory Authority
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:Forests of Massachusetts.**
 
2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.163/21:
Item Number:0084-N-21 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000961630
 
August 28, 2018
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF SECURITY BIOMETRICS, INC. AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2000 AND FOR THE
PERIOD THEN ENDED, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                         257,583
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               267,583
<PP&E>                                          21,540
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,542
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 615,392
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           61,261
<BONDS>                                         14,758
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        50,758
<OTHER-SE>                                     488,615
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   615,392
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,770,077
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,700,068)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,770,068)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,770,068)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)


</TABLE>