alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 767 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 767

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to qualify homeless youth 
and veterans who are full-time students for purposes of the low income 
                          housing tax credit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 13, 2019

   Mr. Portman (for himself, Mr. Brown, and Mr. King) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to qualify homeless youth 
and veterans who are full-time students for purposes of the low income 
                          housing tax credit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Housing for Homeless Students Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. HOMELESS YOUTH AND VETERANS WHO ARE FULL-TIME STUDENTS 
              QUALIFIED FOR PURPOSES OF THE LOW INCOME HOUSING TAX 
              CREDIT.

    (a) In General.--Clause (i) of section 42(i)(3)(D) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by redesignating subclauses (II) and 
(III) as subclauses (IV) and (V), respectively, and by inserting after 
subclause (I) the following new subclauses:
                                    ``(II) a full-time student who, 
                                during any portion of the 7-year period 
                                ending with the commencement of such 
                                individual's continuous occupation of 
                                any low-income unit or units, was an 
                                individual described in section 725(2) 
                                of the McKinney-Vento Homeless 
                                Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11434a(2)),
                                    ``(III) a full-time student who, 
                                during any portion of the 5-year period 
                                ending with the commencement of such 
                                individual's continuous occupation of 
                                any low-income unit or units, was an 
                                individual described in section 2002(1) 
                                of title 38, United States Code,''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to determinations made before, on, or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
### §290. Congressional declaration of policy

The Congress hereby finds and declares that reliable standardized scientific and technical reference data are of vital importance to the progress of the Nation's science and technology. It is therefore the policy of the Congress to make critically evaluated reference data readily available to scientists, engineers, and the general public. It is the purpose of this chapter to strengthen and enhance this policy.

(Pub. L. 90–396, §1, July 11, 1968, 82 Stat. 339.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 90–396, §8, July 11, 1968, 82 Stat. 340, provided that: "This Act [enacting this chapter] may be cited as the 'Standard Reference Data Act'."
# C_2012250EN.01000302.xml

| 18.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 250/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 250/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 June 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Criminal proceedings against Titus Alexander Jochen Donner

(Case C-5/11) (1)

1

(Free movement of goods - Industrial and commercial property - Sale of reproductions of works in a Member State in which the copyright on those works is not protected - Transport of those goods to another Member State in which the infringement of the copyright is sanctioned under criminal law - Criminal proceedings against the transporter for aiding and abetting the unlawful distribution of a work protected by copyright law)

2012/C 250/05

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Party in the main proceedings

Party in the main proceedings

Titus Alexander Jochen Donner

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Bundesgerichtshof — Interpretation of Articles 34 and 36 TFEU — Free movement of goods — Industrial and commercial property — Sale of reproductions of works in a Member State in which the copyright on those works is not protected — Transport of those goods to another Member State in which the infringement of the copyright is sanctioned under criminal law — Situation in which the transfer of property to the purchaser was made in the Member State of origin and the transfer of the de facto power of disposal takes place in the State of destination — Criminal proceedings against the transporter for aiding and abetting the unlawful distribution of a work protected by copyright law

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

A trader who directs his advertising at members of the public residing in a given Member State and creates or makes available to them a specific delivery system and payment method, or allows a third party to do so, thereby enabling those members of the public to receive delivery of copies of works protected by copyright in that same Member State, makes, in the Member State where the delivery takes place, a ‘distribution to the public’ under Article 4(1) of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society.

Articles 34 TFEU and 36 TFEU must be interpreted as meaning that they do not preclude a Member State from bringing a prosecution under national criminal law for the offence of aiding and abetting the prohibited distribution of copyright-protected works where such works are distributed to the public on the territory of that Member State in the context of a sale, aimed specifically at the public of that State, concluded in another Member State where those works are not protected by copyright or the protection conferred on them is not enforceable as against third parties.

---

(1)  OJ C 103, 2.4.2011.

1

---
§ 367.4190 Account 419, Interest and dividend income. ( a ) This account must include interest revenues on securities, loans, notes, advances, special deposits, tax refunds and all other interest-bearing assets, and dividends on stocks of other companies, whether the securities on which the interest and dividends are received are carried as investments or included in sinking or other special fund accounts.
( b ) This account may include the *pro rata* amount necessary to extinguish (during the interval between the date of acquisition and the date of maturity) the difference between the cost to the service company and the face value of interest-bearing securities. The amounts credited or charged must be concurrently included in the accounts in which the securities are carried.
( c ) Where significant in amount, expenses, excluding operating taxes and income taxes, applicable to security investments and to interest and dividend revenues on the account must be charged in this account.
( d ) Related taxes must be recorded in account 408.2, Taxes other than income taxes, other income and deductions (§ 367.4082), or account 409.2, Income taxes, other income and deductions (§ 367.4092).
( e ) Interest accrued, the payment of which is not reasonably assured, dividends receivable that have not been declared or guaranteed, and interest or dividends upon reacquired securities issued or assumed by the service company must not be credited to this account.
### §§4261 to 4264. Repealed. Pub. L. 102–555, §4, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4166

Section 4261, Pub. L. 98–365, title V, §501, July 17, 1984, 98 Stat. 461, related to continued Federal remote-sensing research and development.

Section 4262, Pub. L. 98–365, title V, §502, July 17, 1984, 98 Stat. 462; Pub. L. 100–147, title III, §306, Oct. 30, 1987, 101 Stat. 876, related to remote-sensing research and development activities of Federal agencies.

Section 4263, Pub. L. 98–365, title V, §503, July 17, 1984, 98 Stat. 463, related to sale of experimental data.

Section 4264, Pub. L. 98–365, title V, §504, as added Pub. L. 100–147, title III, §307, Oct. 30, 1987, 101 Stat. 877, related to remote-sensing research and development activities of system operators.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 48 (Friday, March 11, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 13447]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5592]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board


Release of Waybill Data

    The Surface Transportation Board has received a request from 
Covington & Burling on behalf of Union Pacific Corporation (WB468-12--
3/2/11), for permission to use certain data from the Board's 2009 
Carload Waybill Sample. A copy of the request may be obtained from the 
Office of Economics.
    The waybill sample contains confidential railroad and shipper data; 
therefore, if any parties object to these requests, they should file 
their objections with the Director of the Board's Office of Economics 
within 14 calendar days of the date of this notice. The rules for 
release of waybill data are codified at 49 CFR 1244.9.
    Contact: Scott Decker, (202) 245-0330.

Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2011-5592 Filed 3-10-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
# C_2010301EN.01006601.xml

| 6.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/66 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/66

---

Action brought on 17 September 2010 — Dubus v Commission

(Case F-79/10)

()

2010/C 301/107

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Charles Dubus (Tervuren, Belgium) (represented by: E. Boigelot and S. Woog, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the defendant’s decision not to include the applicant in the list of officials promoted to grade AST4/C under the 2009 promotion exercise and application for compensation for non-material damage suffered

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | annul the Commission’s decision, published on 20 November 2009, not to include the applicant on the list of officials promoted from grade AST3/4 to grade AST4/C under the 2009 promotion exercise; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Commission’s decision, published on 20 November 2009, not to include the applicant on the list of officials promoted from grade AST3/4 to grade AST4/C under the 2009 promotion exercise;

| — | as a consequence of that annulment, undertake a further comparative examination of the applicant’s merits and those of the other candidates under the 2009 promotion exercise and promote the applicant to grade AST4C with retroactive effect from 1 January 2009 together with the payment of interest on the arrears of pay at the rate applied by the European Central Bank in its main refinancing operations, from 1 January 2009, increased by 2 points, without however challenging the promotion of the other officials promoted and whose names appear on the list published on 20 November 2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

as a consequence of that annulment, undertake a further comparative examination of the applicant’s merits and those of the other candidates under the 2009 promotion exercise and promote the applicant to grade AST4C with retroactive effect from 1 January 2009 together with the payment of interest on the arrears of pay at the rate applied by the European Central Bank in its main refinancing operations, from 1 January 2009, increased by 2 points, without however challenging the promotion of the other officials promoted and whose names appear on the list published on 20 November 2009;

| — | order the Commission to pay the applicant EUR 3 500 compensation for non-material damage suffered as a result of the fact that he was not promoted on 1 January 2009, without prejudice to any increase during the proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the applicant EUR 3 500 compensation for non-material damage suffered as a result of the fact that he was not promoted on 1 January 2009, without prejudice to any increase during the proceedings;

| — | order the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Commission to pay the costs.

---
#### § 131.70 Form[12]
 of application by State and municipal licensees for exemption from payment of annual charges.

(See § 11.6 of this chapter.) Application by State and municipal licensees for exemption from payment of annual charges must be prepared on this form. The form specifies that in filing application for exemption, the following data and schedules shall be submitted:

1. Name and address of correspondent;

2. Basis for claimed exemption;

3. Generating plants owned or operated by licensee;

4. Transmission lines and distribution lines;

5. KWH of power generated, purchased and interchanged;

6. Power sold or otherwise disposed of (kwh);

7. Power interchange (in detail);

8. Statement of unusual conditions attending the disposition of electric power;

9. Book cost of electric property;

10. Operating revenues;

11. Operating expenses and other deductions from revenues;

12. Affidavit.

[Order 143, 13 FR 6682, Nov. 13, 1948, as amended by Order 756, 77 FR 4894, Feb. 1, 2012]

###### Footnotes -
  131.70

[12] Copies of this form may be obtained upon request from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: April 27, 2016 | Name:  | /s/ Jeffrey L. Parker                                       |   |
|-----------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                  | Title: | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)  |
| Dated: April 27, 2016 | Name:  | /s/ Cynthia L. Poehlman                                                                     |   |
|-----------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                  | Title: | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer andPrincipal Accounting Officer)  |
§ 1308.5 Interest. TVA shall pay a Contractor interest on the amount found to be due on a claim: ( a ) From the date payment is due under the contract or the Contracting Officer receives the claim, whichever is later, until TVA makes payment;
( b ) At the rate payable pursuant to section 12 of the Act on the date from which interest runs pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section.
# C_2012073EN.01001302.xml

| 10.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 73/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 73/13

---

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 December 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from Tribunalul Dâmbovița — Romania) — Victor Cozman v Teatrul Municipal Târgoviște

(Case C-462/11) (1)

1

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - First Additional Protocol to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms - Whether national legislation establishing reductions in the salaries of several categories of public-sector employee is lawful - Lack of connection to European Union law - Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court)

2012/C 73/23

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunalul Dâmbovița

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Victor Cozman

Applicant:

Defendant: Teatrul Municipal Târgoviște

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tribunalul Dâmbovița — Interpretation of Article 1 of the First Additional Protocol to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms — Whether national legislation establishing reductions in the salaries of several categories of public-sector employee is lawful — Nature of remuneration rights — Limitations

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The Court of Justice of the European Union clearly has no jurisdiction to answer the questions referred for a preliminary ruling by Tribunalul Dâmbovița (Romania) by decision of 7 February 2011.

---

(1)  OJ C 331, 12.11.2011.

1

---
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19-0134V

UNPUBLISHED

KRISTAN MCMAHON,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: April 3, 2020

Special Processing Unit (SPU);

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine 

Administration (SIRVA)

Bridget Candace McCullough, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner.

Claudia Barnes Gangi, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

On January 28, 2019, Kristan McMahon filed a petition for compensation under 

the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.

2

(the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered left shoulder injuries related to 

vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccination received 

on October 27, 2017. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing 

Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On April 3, 2020, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. 

Specifically, Respondent agrees that “petitioner’s alleged injury is consistent with SIRVA 

 

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am 

required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the EGovernment Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of 

Electronic Government Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to 

the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to 

redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of 

privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such 

material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. 

§ 300aa (2012).
2

of the left arm and that it meets the requirements of a Table injury claim for SIRVA 

stemming from the flu vaccination administered on October 27, 2017.” Id. at 3. 

Respondent further agrees that “petitioner has met the statutory requirements for 

entitlement to compensation . . . . [and] satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation 

under the Act.” Id.

In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
Editorial Note on Part 12
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 12 appear at 69 FR 32438, June 10, 2004.

§ 12.50 Quality control programs. ( a ) *General rule.* During any construction, repair, or modification of project works, including any corrective measures taken pursuant to § 12.41 of this part, the applicant or licensee must maintain any quality control program that may be required by the Regional Engineer, commensurate with the scope of the work and meeting any requirements or standards set by the Regional Engineer. If a quality control program is required, the construction, repair, or modification may not begin until the Regional Engineer has approved the program.
( b ) If the construction, repair, or modification work is performed by a construction contractor, quality control inspection must be performed by the licensee, the design engineer, or an independent firm, other than the construction contractor, directly accountable to the licensee. This paragraph is not intended to prohibit additional quality control inspections by the construction contractor, or a firm accountable to the construction contractor, for the construction contractor's purposes.
( c ) If the construction, repair, or modification of project works is performed by the applicant's or licensee's own personnel, the applicant or licensee must provide for separation of authority within its organization to make certain that the personnel responsible for quality control inspection are, to the satisfaction of the Regional Engineer or other authorized Commission representative, independent from the personnel who are responsible for the construction, repair or modification.
[Order 122, 46 FR 9036, Jan. 28, 1981. Redesignated and amended at 87 FR 1519, Jan. 11, 2022; 87 FR 8411, Feb. 15, 2022]
§ 342.4 Other rate changing methodologies. ( a ) *Cost-of-service rates.* A carrier may change a rate pursuant to this section if it shows that there is a substantial divergence between the actual costs experienced by the carrier and the rate resulting from application of the index such that the rate at the ceiling level would preclude the carrier from being able to charge a just and reasonable rate within the meaning of the Interstate Commerce Act. A carrier must substantiate the costs incurred by filing the data required by part 346 of this chapter. A carrier that makes such a showing may change the rate in question, based upon the cost of providing the service covered by the rate, without regard to the applicable ceiling level under § 342.3.
( b ) *Market-based rates.* A carrier may attempt to show that it lacks significant market power in the market in which it proposes to charge market-based rates. Until the carrier establishes that it lacks market power, these rates will be subject to the applicable ceiling level under § 342.3.
( c ) *Settlement rates.* A carrier may change a rate without regard to the ceiling level under § 342.3 if the proposed change has been agreed to, in writing, by each person who, on the day of the filing of the proposed rate change, is using the service covered by the rate. A filing pursuant to this section must contain a verified statement by the carrier that the proposed rate change has been agreed to by all current shippers.
[Order 561, 58 FR 58779, Nov. 4, 1993, as amended at 59 FR 59146, Nov. 16, 1994]