alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 12, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2128-2129]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-581]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and AIDS 
Initial Review Group. Microbiology and Infectious Diseases B 
Subcommittee.
    Date: February 10-11, 2011.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Courtyard by Marriott, 5520 Wisconsin Avenue, Chevy 
Chase, MD 20815.
    Contact Person: Gary S. Madonna, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, NIAID, 
National Institutes of Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616, 
Bethesda, MD 20892. 301-496-3528. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a6c1cb9794d1e6c8cfce88c1c9d0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a6c1cb9794d1e6c8cfce88c1c9d0">[email protected]</span></a>.


[[Page 2129]]


(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 6, 2011.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-581 Filed 1-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 49 (Monday, March 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 13601]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5298]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Shasta County Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Shasta County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet 
at the USDA Service Center in Redding, California, on March 30, 2011, 
from 8:30 a.m. to 12 noon. The purpose of this meeting is to discuss 
project updates and proposals, information on monitoring efforts, and a 
timeline for the upcoming year.

DATES: Wednesday, March 30 at 8:30 a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the USDA Service Center, 3644 
Avtech Parkway, Redding, California 96002.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Resource Advisory Committee Designated 
Federal Official Donna Harmon at (530) 226-2335 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#54303c3526393b3a1432277a3231307a2127"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7f1b171e0d1210113f190c51191a1b510a0c">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Public 
input sessions will be provided and individuals will have the 
opportunity to address the Shasta County Resource Advisory Committee.

    Dated: March 1, 2011.
J. Sharon Heywood,
Forest Supervisor, Shasta-Trinity National Forest.
[FR Doc. 2011-5298 Filed 3-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**EXHIBIT 32.a**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.(the “Fund”) on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2009 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, John P. Manning, Principal Executive Officer of the general partner of thegeneral partner of the Fund’s general partner, C&M Management Inc., certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after dueinquiry:

 
| (1)    | The  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)-15 or 15(d)-15  of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                |
| (2)    | The  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund. |

 

 
| Date:               |                               |
|---------------------|------------------------------------|
| July 14,  2009 | /s/ John P. Manning |
|                |                               |
|                | John P. Manning          |
|                | Principal  Executive Officer       |

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, orother document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Fundand will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6616

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JAMAL ANTWAN MOON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.

(CR-99-203, CA-01-432)

Submitted: July 19, 2002 Decided: September 20, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jamal Antwan Moon, Appellant Pro Se. Darryl James Mitchell, Special

Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Jamal Antwan Moon seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2002). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant the motion for

enlargement of the record, deny the motion for leave to take

deposition, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States

v. Moon, Nos. CR-99-203; CA-01-432 (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 15, 2002,

entered Jan. 16, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
### §6823. Criminal penalty

#### (a) In general

Whoever knowingly and intentionally violates, or knowingly and intentionally attempts to violate, section 6821 of this title shall be fined in accordance with title 18 or imprisoned for not more than 5 years, or both.

#### (b) Enhanced penalty for aggravated cases

Whoever violates, or attempts to violate, section 6821 of this title while violating another law of the United States or as part of a pattern of any illegal activity involving more than $100,000 in a 12-month period shall be fined twice the amount provided in subsection (b)(3) or (c)(3) (as the case may be) of section 3571 of title 18, imprisoned for not more than 10 years, or both.

(Pub. L. 106–102, title V, §523, Nov. 12, 1999, 113 Stat. 1448.)
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Dana S. Philbrook, hereby certify that:



(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Service Bancorp, Inc.;



(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



(4) The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



(5) The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal controls over financial reporting.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ DANA S. PHILBROOK  
|Dana S. Philbrook      
|Chief Financial Officer
|May 12, 2005
###### Editorial Note on Part 28

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear at 76 FR 76873, Dec. 9, 2011.

#### § 28.67 Production of statements.

After an individual has given evidence in a proceeding, any party may request a copy of any prior signed statement made by that individual which is relevant to the evidence given. If the party refuses to furnish the statement, the administrative judge may draw an adverse inference from the failure to produce or may exclude the relevant evidence given by the individual from consideration.
§ 367.2330 Account 233, Notes payable to associate companies. ( a ) This account must include amounts owing to associate companies on notes, drafts, acceptances, or other similar evidences of indebtedness, and open accounts payable on demand or not more than one year from date of issue or creation.
( b ) Exclude from this account notes and accounts that are includible in account 223, Advances from associate companies (§ 367.2230).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF LOSS AND ACCUMULATED DEFICIT AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE  TO SUCH 10QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED January
31, 2000.


<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          Apr-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               Jan-31-1999
<CASH>                                             166
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   166
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     166
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               50
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      10000
<COMMON>                                          1935
<OTHER-SE>                                      (11819)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       166
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1396
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (1396)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (1396)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.00)



</TABLE>
^ 

•il-mRTMENTOF 

•:^^ix;S?ORT;;iiON 

'^^/''T OPERATIONS 

SERVED MARCH 14, 2011 

"Oil YM 15 A !0^53 

j-V"v - - >!'-'•» 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC. 

FAA DOCKET No. CPlOSWOOl 1 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS No. FAA-2010-0978 

IN THE MATTER OF 

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC. 

FAA DOCKET No. CP10SW0012 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS No. FAA-2010-0979 

IN THE MATTER OF 

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC. 

FAA DOCKET No. CP10SW0013 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS No. FAA-2010-0980 
V U' 

: •! 

1 

l.l ^ 

mi 

FAk^ 

'm 

F-i.;. 

fe-J 

^^ 3M 

1-" ' 

&'c 

i!l)' 

;i*F 

fiti ^ 

mf^. 

m-. 

It;r^' . < 'CDI^O 

fcvj* 

^^"-4 

FAJ(^#C 

toberI2.13,and|iilil 

•«W54 to as "Cot 

.HespoodenJCc 

. OnUmM 

e cases, cj 

R. § 13.21J 

•y^ y withdraw I 

t^s'the cpm{>i8|iit| 

t}^ administtiiii 

withprejudibe." 

« 

mf 

^'^ ^ -/ 

gS^'^^ /• ••'" f. 

p i J 

^w'* " 

^p, ' 

m^ i 0"* "' * ^ "*•' 

i v : •'' : 

»•£ 

'•% % 

' '^^ 1 '^i 

' IK? 

' ^ « 

'"il ' ^ 

• i.i 

v,:K^ 
/ 

WHEREFORE, the within filed Witlidrawal of Complaint having been read and 

considered, it is ORDERED as follows: 

1. Complainant's Withdrawal of Complaint be and is hereby granted; and 

2. These proceedings be and are hereby dismissed with prejudice. 

SO ORDERED. 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 

b 
<i«f, «5S| 

a'.-Hi 

if; 

f^ 

'^'i^ 

'•-S- ;S 

W^^ 

S»-il 

aH«^. ''«; ^a
#### §§ 46.105-46.106 [Reserved]
### §78jj. Repealed. Pub. L. 100–181, title III, §330, Dec. 4, 1987, 101 Stat. 1259

Section, act June 6, 1934, ch. 404, title II, §211, 48 Stat. 909, provided for a study and report by Securities and Exchange Commission of reorganization proceedings. Study as basis for Trust Indenture Act of 1939, see section 77bbb of this title.
#### § 1318.509 Substantial compliance.

Substantial compliance with these procedures must be achieved. Minor deviations approved by the official responsible for NEPA compliance do not give rise to any independent cause of action.
# C_2010148EN.01003901.xml

| 5.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/39

---

Action brought on 26 March 2010 — Milux v OHIM (REFLUXCONTROL)

(Case T-139/10)

2010/C 148/65

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant(s): Milux Holding SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: J. Bojs, lawyer)

Applicant(s):

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 13 January 2010 in case R 1134/2009-4; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 13 January 2010 in case R 1134/2009-4; and

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark “REFLUXCONTROL” for goods and services in classes 9, 10 and 44

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the examiner: Refused the application for a Community trade mark

Decision of the examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal misapplied the principle of non-discrimination to the facts of this case; in the alternative, infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal erred in its conclusion that the trade mark applied for does not possess sufficient inherent distinctiveness.

Pleas in law:

---
#### § 1308.14 Request for relief by TVA.

When TVA believes it is due relief under a contract, the Contracting Officer shall make a request for relief against the Contractor, and shall attempt to resolve the request by agreement. If agreement cannot be reached within a reasonable time, the Contracting Officer shall issue a decision which complies with the requirements of § 1308.12(b).
* This Order and Judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept

under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicat a, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order andjudgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of Tenth Ci r. R. 36.3. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Filed 6/3/96 TENTH CIRCUIT

______ GEORGE T. HOWELL, III, ) ) Petitioner-Appellant, ) ) v. ) No. 96-1074 ) (D.C. No. 95-Z-2223) J.W. BOOKER, Warden, ) (Dist. of Colo.) ) Respondent-Appellee. )

______ ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

______ Before ANDERSON, BARRETT, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

______ After examining the briefs and the appellate record , this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); Tenth Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is t herefore ordered submitted without oral argument. George T. Howell, III (Howell), an inmate of the Fe deral Correctional institute, in Florence, Colorado, appe aring prose , appeals from the district court’s order accepting a nd adopting the United States Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation anddismissing-2-

without prejudice Howell’s petition for a writ of h abeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The court gran ted Howell leave to file a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion in the United Sta tes District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. Howell filed this action under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 cha llenging the validity of his conviction in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The magistr ate judge and the district court ruled that Howell may attack tha t conviction only in the district court that rendered the convic tion. The district court further ruled that Howell’s claims p ursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Burea u of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971) must be dismissed because there are no allegations in the record that would allow the cour t to exercise personal jurisdiction over the defendants residing in the State of Illinois. On appeal, Howell contends that the district court abused its discretion in denying his petition for relief. He argues that he has already presented his argument to the federal d istrict court in Illinois and that court ruled that he was procedura lly barred because he had not raised the claims prior to trial under Fed. R. Crim. P. 12(b)(2). We are obliged to construe prosepleadings liberally. Haines
v. Kerner , 404 U.S. 519, 520-21 (1972). On appeal, we will uphold a dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) only whe n it appears-3-

that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in sup port of the claims that would entitle the plaintiff to relief, accepting all of the well-pleaded allegations of the complaint as tr ue. Roman v. Cessna Aircraft Co. , 55 F.3d 542, 543 (10th Cir. 1995). We affirm the district court substantially for the reasons set forth in the “Recommendation of United States Magis trate Judge” dated and entered October 2, 1995.

Entered for the Court:

James E. Barrett, Senior United States Circuit Judge
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theAnnual Report of CellStar Corporation (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-K for thefiscal year ended November 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies,in the capacity as indicated below and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of his knowledge:

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. 
|        |   | /s/ Michael J. Farrell                                   |   |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Michael J. Farrell, Executive Vice President of  Finance |
|   |   | Date: February 12, 2007                                  |

 

----
### §77ttt. Hearings by Commission

Hearings may be public and may be held before the Commission, any member or members thereof, or any officer or officers of the Commission designated by it, and appropriate records thereof shall be kept.

(May 27, 1933, ch. 38, title III, §320, as added Aug. 3, 1939, ch. 411, 53 Stat. 1174.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of Securities and Exchange Commission, with certain exceptions, to Chairman of such Commission, see Reorg. Plan No. 10 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3175, 64 Stat. 1265, set out under section 78d of this title.