alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OFFICE OF THE 

SECRETARY 

STATE OF DELAWARE 

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 

AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL 

89 KINGS HIGHWAY 

DOVER, DELAWARE 19901 

April 27, 2011 

PHONE: (302) 739-9000 

FAX: (302) 739-6242 

Mr. Shawn M. Garvin (3RAOO) 

Regional Administrator 

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Region III 

1650 Arch Street 

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029 

Dear Mr. Garvin: 

I am pleased to submit the enclosed revision to the State of Delaware State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) for the Attainment and Maintenance of the 8-Hour Ozone 

National Ambient Air Quality Standard. The revision is to 7 DE Admin. Code 1124-

CONTROL OF VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND EMISSIONS. The revisions 

update relevant regulations to implement Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) 

controls on emission sources covered in EPA's Control Techniques Guidelines (CTG) or 

Alternate Control Techniques (ACT). EPA has updated several CTGs and the afore-mentioned 

revisions to 7 DE Admin Code 1124 reflect DE's efforts accordingly. Specifically, 

• Section 8.0, Handling, Storage, and Disposal of Volatile Organic Compounds 

(VOC). This revision updates the existing work practice standards, and adds a new 

generally applicable cleaning solvent VOC content limit. 

• Section 13.0 Automobile and Light-Duty Truck Coating Operations. This revision 

sets more stringent emissions limits. 

• Section 16.0 Paper Coating. The revision adds "film and foil coating" to the 

regulated category. 

• Section 23.0 Coating of Flat Wood Paneling. The revision sets up more stringent 

emission limits. 

• Section 37.0 Graphic Art Systems. The revision adds "flexible packaging printing" 

to the regulated category. 

• Section 45.0 Industrial Cleaning Solvents. The revision clarifies that the 

requirements of 45.0 are triggered based on "VOC emissions" rather than "solvent 

used." 

These revisions are effective March 11, 2011. 

>~ .... ,: .. -.'. . - .' - ,- -~~ 
Mr. Shawn M. Garvin 

April 27, 2011 

Page 2 

The proposed amendment to Section 47.0 - Offset Lithographic Printing was 

withdrawn as a SIP revision due to public comments received by the Department which 

resulted in substantive changes. This proposed amendment will be addressed at a future 

date. 

The requirements of the CAA Section 110(a)(2)(A) have been met through the normal 

public hearing process established by the State of Delaware with proper notification (30 days) 

prior to the convening of the public hearing. Attachments A and B are copies of affidavits as 

proof of proper notification. It is the position of the State of Delaware that all minimum 

requirements set forth in the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments have been met. 

We look forward to continuing the cooperative effort between Delaware and EPA in this 

important work. As always, feel free to contact me or Ali Mirzakhalili, Director, Division of Air 

Quality, (302) 739-9402, if you have any questions concerning the enclosed documents. 

Secretary 

Enclosures 

cc: Diana Esher, EPA w/encl. 

Ali Mirzakhalili
###### Editorial Note on Part 284

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 284 appear at 65 FR 10222, Feb. 25, 2000.

#### § 284.263 Exemption from section 7 of Natural Gas Act and certain regulatory conditions.

Any participant that engages in an emergency natural gas transaction conducted in accordance with this subpart is exempt from the requirements of section 7 of the Natural Gas Act and the conditions of § 284.10, except as provided in § 284.266, and from the requirements of §§ 284.7-284.9 and §§ 284.11-284.13 of subpart A of this part. Participation in any emergency natural gas transaction will not subject any participant to the jurisdiction of the Commission under section 7 of the Natural Gas Act except to the extent such transaction is provided for in this subpart.
§ 35.9 Requirements for filing rate schedules, tariffs or service agreements. ( a ) Rate schedules, tariffs, and service agreements may be filed either by dividing the rate schedule, tariff, or service agreements into individual sheets or sections, or as an entire document except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section.
( b ) Open Access Transmission Tariffs (OATT) filed by utilities that are not Independent System Operators or Regional Transmission Organizations must be filed either as individual sheets or sections. If filed as sections, the sections must be no larger than the 1.0 level, although each schedule or attachment may be a single section. Individual service agreements that are entered into pursuant to the OATT may be filed as entire documents.
( c ) OATT and other open access documents filed by Independent System Operators or Regional Transmission Organizations must be filed either as individual sheets or sections. If filed as sections, the sections must be no larger than the 1.1 level, including schedules or attachments. Individual service agreements that are part entered into pursuant to the OATT may be filed as entire documents.
[Order 714, 73 FR 57531, Oct. 3, 2008]
#### § 141.15 Annual Conveyance Report.

If a licensee of a hydropower project is required by its license to file with the Commission an annual report of conveyances of easements or rights-of-way across, or leases of, project lands, the report must be filed only if such a conveyance or lease of project lands has occurred in the previous year.

[Order 540, 57 FR 21738, May 22, 1992]
# C_2013252EN.01000902.xml

| 31.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 July 2013 — Team Relocations NV, Amertranseuro International Holdings Ltd, Trans Euro Ltd, Team Relocations Ltd v European Commission

(Case C-444/11 P) (1)

1

(Appeals - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement - International removal services market in Belgium - Direct and indirect price-fixing, market-sharing and manipulation of the procedures for the submission of tenders - Single and continuous infringement - Imputability - Guidelines on the method of setting fines (2006) - Value of sales - Concept - Proportion - Additional amount - Mitigating circumstances - Obligation to state reasons - Imputability to the parent company of the infringement - Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Article 23(2) - Ceiling of 10 % of turnover - Proportionality)

2013/C 252/14

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellants: Team Relocations NV (represented by: H. Gilliams, J. Bocken and L. Gyselen, avocaten), Amertranseuro International Holdings Ltd, Trans Euro Ltd, Team Relocations Ltd

Appellants:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: A. Bouquet and N. von Lingen and by A. Antoniadis, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

APPEAL against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 16 June 2011 in Joined Cases T-204/08 and T-212/08 Team Relocations NV and Others v Commission, by which the General Court dismissed an action seeking the partial annulment of Commission Decision C(2008) 926 final of 11 March 2008 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 (EC) and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38.543 — International Removal Services), concerning a cartel on the Belgium international removal services market involving direct and indirect price-fixing, market-sharing and manipulation of the procedures for the submission of tenders, and the annulment of the fine imposed on the applicant or, in the alternative, reduction of that fine.

Team Relocations NV and Others

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Team Relocations NV, Amertranseuro International Holdings Ltd, Trans Euro Ltd and Team Relocations Ltd jointly and severally to bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Team Relocations NV, Amertranseuro International Holdings Ltd, Trans Euro Ltd and Team Relocations Ltd jointly and severally to bear the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 347, 26.11.2011.

1

---
# C_2006294EN.01000302.xml

| 2.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 3 October 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Cremona — Italy) — Banca popolare di Cremona Soc. coop. arl v Agenzia Entrate Ufficio Cremona

(Case C-475/03) (1)

1

(Sixth VAT Directive - Article 33(1) - Prohibition on the levying of other domestic taxes which can be characterised as turnover taxes - Definition of ‘turnover taxes’ - Italian regional tax on productive activities)

(2006/C 294/05)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Commissione tributaria provinciale di Cremona

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Banca popolare di Cremona Soc. coop. arl

Applicant:

Defendant: Agenzia Entrate Ufficio Cremona

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Commissione tributaria provinciale di Cremona — Interpretation of Article 33 of Directive 77/388/EEC: Sixth Council Directive of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1), as amended by Council Directive 91/680/EEC of 16 December 1991 (OJ 1991 L 376, p. 1) — Compatibility of national legislation introducing a regional tax on production activities

Operative part of the judgment

Article 33 of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, as amended by Council Directive 91/680/CEE of 16 December 1991, must be interpreted as meaning that it does not preclude the maintenance of a charge to tax with the characteristics of the tax at issue in the main proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 21, 24.01.2004.

1

---
Prevention Fill-It-In

Use this activity to make your #MyPreventionStory — finish the sentences below, take a 

screenshot or photo, and share it on social media using the hashtag #MyPreventionStory 

to join the conversation.

GENERAL 

1. Prevention is important to me because: 

2. To me, prevention represents: 

3. I love that the prevention community: 

4. I take care of my mental health through: 

5. I help prevent substance use by: 

6. I lead a safe, healthy life by: 

PERSONAL STORY 

1. I feel supported in my [prevention/recovery] journey by: 

2. An activity that is important to my prevention story is: 

3. Prevention/recovery allows me to: 

PROFESSIONAL STORY 

1. I got involved with the field of prevention because: 

2. My organization is committed to prevention by: 

3. I enjoy working in the field of prevention because:
### §7311. Additional applicability

The authorities and restrictions applicable under this chapter to the Director and to Teams shall apply to the activities of the National Institute of Standards and Technology in response to the attacks of September 11, 2001.

(Pub. L. 107–231, §12, Oct. 1, 2002, 116 Stat. 1476.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 107–231, Oct. 1, 2002, 116 Stat. 1471, known as the National Construction Safety Team Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 7301 of this title and Tables.
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.18






Dynex Capital, Inc.
Non-Employee Directors’ Annual Compensation
As of March 1, 2016






Cash Compensation


Annual retainer
Non-Employee Director    $    55,000 
Non-Employee Chairman    $    75,000
Lead Independent Director    $    15,000        
Audit Committee Chair    $    10,000
Compensation Committee Chair    $    5,000
Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee Chair    $    5,000


Annual retainers are payable in quarterly installments, prorated for the number of months served in the case of a change during the calendar year.  




Excess meeting fee
In addition to the annual retainers, non-employee directors will also receive a cash fee of $1,000 for each meeting of the Board of Directors or a Board Committee attended as a member in excess of 15 meetings per year.






Equity Compensation


Non-employee directors will also receive an annual grant of restricted shares of the Company’s common stock with a grant date fair value of $50,000, which shares will vest at the end of one year.  The shares are to be granted on the first Friday following the annual meeting of shareholders.
§ 3.29 Feeding. ( a ) Guinea pigs and hamsters shall be fed each day except as otherwise might be required to provide adequate veterinary care. The food shall be free from contamination, wholesome, palatable and of sufficient quantity and nutritive value to meet the normal daily requirements for the condition and size of the guinea pig or hamster.
( b ) Food comprising the basic diet shall be at least equivalent in quality and content to pelleted rations produced commercially and commonly available from feed suppliers.
( c ) The basic diet of guinea pigs and hamsters may be supplemented with good quality fruits or vegetables consistent with their individual dietary requirements.
( d ) Food receptacles, if used, shall be accessible to all guinea pigs or hamsters in a primary enclosure and shall be located so as to minimize contamination by excreta. All food receptacles shall be kept clean and shall be sanitized at least once every 2 weeks. If self-feeders are used for the feeding of pelleted feed, measures must be taken to prevent molding, deterioration or caking of the feed. Hamsters may be fed pelleted feed on the floor of a primary enclosure.
( e ) Fruit or vegetable food supplements may be placed upon the bedding within the primary enclosure: *Provided, however,* That the uneaten portion of such supplements and any bedding soiled as a result of such feeding practices shall be removed from the primary enclosure when such uneaten supplements accumulate or such bedding becomes soiled to a degree that might be harmful or uncomfortable to animals therein.
#### § 4.84 Surrender of permit.

A permittee must submit a petition to the Commission before the permittee may voluntarily surrender its permit. Unless the Commission issues an order to the contrary, the permit will remain in effect through the thirtieth day after the Commission issues a public notice of receipt of the petition.

[Order 413, 50 FR 11686, Mar. 25, 1985]
§ 22.15 Conferences and Orders [Rule 15]. ( a ) *Initial status conference.* As soon as practicable after the filing of the complaint and answer, the Board shall schedule an initial status conference to discuss the issues of the case, the procedures available under the Board's rules of resolution of the case, and a tentative schedule for such resolution, including the plan for possible discovery required by Rule 8(c), the possibility of alternative dispute resolution (see Rule 24), and the possibility of dispositive motions.
( b ) *Status conferences and reports.* At any time during the appeal, the Board, upon its own initiative or upon the request of one of the parties, may call upon the parties or their attorneys or representatives to appear before the Board (or one or more members thereof) for a status conference to consider or report on whatever matters are necessary to aid in the disposition of the appeal. Such matters may include, for example, the simplification or clarification of issues, the necessity or desirability of amendments to the pleadings, agreements and rulings to facilitate discovery, progress reports during discovery, and pre-hearing procedures and scheduling. Status conferences may be conducted in person or by telephone, and the Board generally will make an order which recites the action taken at the conference(s). From time to time, the Board also may require one or more of the parties, either jointly or individually, to provide status reports concerning any matter that aids in the disposition of the appeal.
( c ) *Rulings, orders, and directions.* The Board may make such rulings and issue such orders and directions as are necessary to secure the informal, expeditious, and inexpensive resolution of every case before the Board. Any ruling, order, or direction that the Board may make or issue pursuant to the rules of this Board may be made on the motion of any party or on the initiative of the Board. The Board may also amend, alter, or vacate a ruling, order, or direction upon such terms as it deems appropriate. In making rulings and issuing orders and directions, the Board will take into consideration those Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Federal Rules of Evidence which address matters not specifically covered herein.
[73 FR 60610, Oct. 14, 2008]
(67 South. 376)

No. 21008.

#### STATE v. RENFRO.

(Jan. 25, 1915.)

*(Syllabus by the Court.)*

Bail <®=>94^-Foef3situkb — Appeal.

Appeals in criminal cases must be taken, by motion, verbally or in writing, in open court, within three days after sentence shall have been pronounced; otherwise, they will be dismissed. The rule applies to appeals from judgments forfeiting appearance bonds, which are criminal proceedings.

[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Bail, Cent. Dig. §§ 418 — 423; Dec. Dig. <@^94J

Appeal from First Judicial District Court, Parish of Caddo; J. R. Land, Judge.

E. A. Renfro, being charged with selling intoxicating liquors without a license, gave an appearance bond, and from a judgment thereon he appeals.

Appeal dismissed.

Lewell C. Butler, of Shreveport, for appellant. R. G. Pleasant, Atty. Gen. (W. A. Mabry, Dist. Atty., of Shreveport, and G. A. Gondran, of New Orleans, of counsel), for the State.

On Motion to Dismiss Appeal.

MONROE, C. J.

This purports to be an appeal from a judgment condemning defendant and his surety for the amount of an appearance bond, given in a prosecution for selling intoxicating liquor without previously obtaining a license. The state moves to dismiss the appeal, on the ground that it was not applied for within three days from the date of the judgment. The judgment was rendered on October 10, and signed on October 12, and the motion for appeal was filed October 30, 1914.

The proceeding to forfeit an appearance bond is criminal in character. State v. Sam Burns, 38 La. Ann. 363; State v. Toups, 44 La. Ann. 896, 11 South. 524; State v. Alexander, 46 La. Ann. 550, 15 South. 361.1 Ap*589peals in criminal cases must be taken by motion, verbally or in writing, in open court, within three days after sentence shall have been pronounced. Act No. 108 of 1898, § 1; State v. Segreto, 124 La. 99, 49 South. 992; State v. Lawrence, 124 La. 379, 50 South. 406; State v. Rollins, 125 La. 297, 51 South. 204. The appeal is dismissed.

1

 Reported in full in the Southern Reporter; reported as a memorandum decision without opinion in 46 La. Ann. 550.
#### § 367.29 Compensation for use of capital.

A servicing transaction is deemed to be performed at no more than cost if the price of the service does not exceed a fair and equitable allocation of expenses plus reasonable compensation for necessary capital procured through the issuance of capital stock. Interest on borrowed capital and compensation for the use of capital must only represent a reasonable return on the amount of capital reasonably necessary for the performance of services or construction work for, or the sale of goods to, associate companies. The compensation may be estimated and must be computed monthly. The amount of compensation must be stated separately in each billing to the associate companies. An annual statement to support the amount of compensation for use of capital billed for the previous 12 months and how it was calculated must be supplied to each associate company at the end of the calendar year.
§ 1308.33 Hearings. ( a ) TVA shall arrange for the verbatim reporting of evidentiary hearings before the Hearing Officer, and shall provide the Hearing Officer with the original transcript. The parties shall make their own arrangements with the reporter for copies.
( b ) Admissibility of evidence shall generally be governed by the Federal Rules of Evidence, subject, however, to the Hearing Officer's discretion. As used in those Rules, the term *court* shall be deemed to mean “Hearing Officer.”
( c ) ( 1 ) Conduct of hearings shall generally be governed by Rules 42-44, 44.1, and 46 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, except that the Hearing Officer may modify those Rules to meet the needs of the parties in a particular case. The terms *court, plaintiff, defendant,* and *action* as used in those Rules shall be deemed to have the meaning given them in § 1308.32.
( 2 ) After the Contractor has completed the presentation of his evidence, TVA, without waiving the right to offer evidence in the event the motion is not granted, may move for a dismissal on the ground that upon the facts and the law the Contractor has shown no right to relief. The Hearing Officer as the trier of the facts may then determine them and render a decision against the Contractor, or take the matter under advisement, or decline to render any decision until the close of all the evidence. Any decision rendered under this paragraph shall conform to § 1308.37, and is a decision within the meaning of § 1308.23.
( d ) Hearings shall be as informal as may be reasonable and appropriate under the circumstances, and shall be held at a time and place to be specified by the Hearing Officer.
( e ) Evidentiary subpoenas are subject to Subpart E of this part.
[44 FR 29648, May 22, 1979. Redesignated at 44 FR 30682, May 29, 1979, and amended at 49 FR 3845, Jan. 31, 1984]
### §524. Enforcement of coastwise trade laws

Officers and members of the Coast Guard are authorized to enforce chapter 551 of title 46. The Secretary shall establish a program for these officers and members to enforce that chapter.

(Added Pub. L. 111–281, title II, §216(a), Oct. 15, 2010, 124 Stat. 2917, §100; renumbered §524, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §105(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4200.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 100 of this title as this section.
# C_2011160EN.01002103.xml

| 28.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 160/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 160/21

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 April 2011 — Euro-Information v OHIM (EURO AUTOMATIC PAYMENT)

(Case T-28/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark EURO AUTOMATIC PAYMENT - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive nature - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2011/C 160/33

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Euro-Information — Européenne de traitement de l'information (Strasbourg, France) (represented by: A. Grolée, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 November 2009 (Case R 635/2009-2) regarding an application for registration of the word sign EURO AUTOMATIC PAYMENT as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Euro-Information — Européenne de traitement de l'information to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Euro-Information — Européenne de traitement de l'information to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 80, 27.3.2010.

1

---