Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 47 / Thursday, March 10, 2011 / Notices 13231 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

74,634 ............... A. H. Schreiber Company, Inc. .......................................................... Bristol, TN. ...................................

74,706 ............... Busch Agricultural Resources, LLC, Anheuser-Busch, Inc. .............. Manitowoc, WI. ............................

74,756 ............... Fort McDowell Yavapai Materials, Plants 1, 3 and 20 ...................... Fort McDowell, AZ ....................... September 27, 

2009. 

74,756A ............. Fort McDowell Yavapai Materials, Plants 4 and 70 .......................... Buckeye, AZ ................................ September 27, 

2009. 

74,756B ............. Fort McDowell Yavapai Materials, Plant 40 ....................................... Scottsdale, AZ ............................. September 27, 

2009. 

74,756C ............. Fort McDowell Yavapai Materials, Plant 50 ....................................... Glendale, AZ ................................ September 27, 

2009. 

74,756D ............. Fort McDowell Yavapai Materials, Plant 60 ....................................... Queen Creek, AZ ......................... September 27, 

2009. 

74,772 ............... HEITEC, Inc., Including Workers Wages that are Reported Under 

Hacker Engineering, Inc.

Palm Desert, CA. .........................

75,027 ............... K.W.S., Inc. ........................................................................................ Cheboygan, MI. ...........................

The investigation revealed that the 

criteria under paragraphs (b)(2) and 

(b)(3) (public agency acquisition of 

services from a foreign country) of 

section 222 have not been met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

74,979 ............... City of Walla Walla, Development Services Department .................. Walla Walla, WA. .........................

Determinations Terminating 

Investigations of Petitions for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

After notice of the petitions was 

published in the Federal Register and 

on the Department’s Web site, as 

required by Section 221 of the Act (19 

U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated 

investigations of these petitions. 

The following determinations 

terminating investigations were issued 

because the petitioner has requested 

that the petition be withdrawn. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

74,853 ............... Kurz-Kasch ......................................................................................... South Boston, VA ........................

The following determinations 

terminating investigations were issued 

because the petitioning groups of 

workers are covered by active 

certifications. Consequently, further 

investigation in these cases would serve 

no purpose since the petitioning group 

of workers cannot be covered by more 

than one certification at a time. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

74,438 ............... Bruss North America, Inc. .................................................................. Orion, MI. .....................................

74,978 ............... Western Union, LLC, Operations Division ......................................... St. Charles, MO. ..........................

The following determinations 

terminating investigations were issued 

because the petitions are the subject of 

ongoing investigations under petitions 

filed earlier covering the same 

petitioners. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

75,187 ............... Dex One ............................................................................................. Morrisville, NC. ............................

I hereby certify that the 

aforementioned determinations were 

issued during the period of February 14, 

2011 through February 18, 2011. Copies 

of these determinations may be 

requested under the Freedom of 

Information Act. Requests may be 

submitted by fax, courier services, or 

mail to FOIA Disclosure Officer, Office 

of Trade Adjustment Assistance (ETA), 

U.S. Department of Labor, 200 

Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 

DC 20210 or to foiarequest@dol.gov. 

These determinations also are available 

on the Department’s Web site at 

http://www.doleta.gov/tradeact under 

the searchable listing of determinations. 

Dated: March 2, 2011. 

Michael W. Jaffe, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2011–5475 Filed 3–9–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Notice of Determinations Regarding 

Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 

U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor 

herein presents summaries of 


jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
13232 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 47 / Thursday, March 10, 2011 / Notices 

determinations regarding eligibility to 

apply for trade adjustment assistance for 

workers by (TA–W) number issued 

during the period of February 22, 2011 

through February 25, 2011. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for workers of 

a primary firm and a certification issued 

regarding eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(a) of the Act must be met. 

I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the 

following must be satisfied: 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) The sales or production, or both, 

of such firm have decreased absolutely; 

and 

(3) One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

(A) Imports of articles or services like 

or directly competitive with articles 

produced or services supplied by such 

firm have increased; 

(B) Imports of articles like or directly 

competitive with articles into which one 

or more component parts produced by 

such firm are directly incorporated, 

have increased; 

(C) Imports of articles directly 

incorporating one or more component 

parts produced outside the United 

States that are like or directly 

competitive with imports of articles 

incorporating one or more component 

parts produced by such firm have 

increased; 

(D) Imports of articles like or directly 

competitive with articles which are 

produced directly using services 

supplied by such firm, have increased; 

and 

(4) The increase in imports 

contributed importantly to such 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation and to the decline in the 

sales or production of such firm; or 

II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the 

following must be satisfied: 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

(A) There has been a shift by the 

workers’ firm to a foreign country in the 

production of articles or supply of 

services like or directly competitive 

with those produced/supplied by the 

workers’ firm; 

(B) There has been an acquisition 

from a foreign country by the workers’ 

firm of articles/services that are like or 

directly competitive with those 

produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; 

and 

(3) The shift/acquisition contributed 

importantly to the workers’ separation 

or threat of separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected workers in public agencies and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(b) of the Act must be met. 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in the public agency have 

become totally or partially separated, or 

are threatened to become totally or 

partially separated; 

(2) The public agency has acquired 

from a foreign country services like or 

directly competitive with services 

which are supplied by such agency; and 

(3) the acquisition of services 

contributed importantly to such 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected secondary workers of a firm and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(c) of the Act must be met. 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in the workers’ firm have 

become totally or partially separated, or 

are threatened to become totally or 

partially separated; 

(2) The workers’ firm is a Supplier or 

Downstream Producer to a firm that 

employed a group of workers who 

received a certification of eligibility 

under Section 222(a) of the Act, and 

such supply or production is related to 

the article or service that was the basis 

for such certification; and 

(3) Either— 

(A) The workers’ firm is a supplier 

and the component parts it supplied to 

the firm described in paragraph (2) 

accounted for at least 20 percent of the 

production or sales of the workers’ firm; 

or 

(B) a loss of business by the workers’ 

firm with the firm described in 

paragraph (2) contributed importantly to 

the workers’ separation or threat of 

separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected workers in firms identified by 

the International Trade Commission and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 222(f) 

of the Act must be met. 

(1) The workers’ firm is publicly 

identified by name by the International 

Trade Commission as a member of a 

domestic industry in an investigation 

resulting in— 

(A) An affirmative determination of 

serious injury or threat thereof under 

section 202(b)(1); 

(B) An affirmative determination of 

market disruption or threat thereof 

under section 421(b)(1); or 

(C) An affirmative final determination 

of material injury or threat thereof under 

section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A)); 

(2) The petition is filed during the 

1-year period beginning on the date on 

which— 

(A) A summary of the report 

submitted to the President by the 

International Trade Commission under 

section 202(f)(1) with respect to the 

affirmative determination described in 

paragraph (1)(A) is published in the 

Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); 

or 

(B) Notice of an affirmative 

determination described in 

subparagraph (1) is published in the 

Federal Register; and 

(3) The workers have become totally 

or partially separated from the workers’ 

firm within— 

(A) The 1-year period described in 

paragraph (2); or 

(B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), 

the 1-year period preceding the 1-year 

period described in paragraph (2). 

Affirmative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The date following the company 

name and location of each 

determination references the impact 

date for all workers of such 

determination. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the 

Trade Act have been met. 

TA–W number Subject firm Location Impact date 

74,789 ................ Convergys Corporation, Customer Management .................. Orem, UT ............................... September 29, 2009. 


jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 47 / Thursday, March 10, 2011 / Notices 13233 

TA–W number Subject firm Location Impact date 

75,158 ................ Penske Logistics, LLC, Customer Service Dept., General 

Electric, Kelly Temporary Services, etc.

El Paso, TX ............................ January 31, 2010. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or 

services) of the Trade Act have been 

met. 

TA–W number Subject firm Location Impact date 

74,797 ................ Martin Mills, Inc., Jeanerette Distribution Center; Fruit of the 

Loom; Leased Workers Spherion.

Jeanerette, LA .......................

74,902 ................ Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc., Leased Workers of Manpower .. Alameda, CA .......................... November 18, 2009. 

75,007 ................ Serigraph, Inc., Integrated Graphics Group; Leased Workers 

from Seek Inc.

West Bend, WI ....................... December 15, 2009. 

75,152 ................ Pratt and Whitney, Cheshire Engine Center; United Technologies Corp.; Leased Workers Belcan, etc.Cheshire, CT .......................... January 11, 2010. 

75,154 ................ Apex Tool Group, LLC, Leased Workers from Staffmark ...... Monroe, NC ........................... January 24, 2010. 

75,190 ................ Compucredit Holdings Corporation, Credit Cards—Collections Division; Leased Workers Axiom and Resource Mosaic.Atlanta, GA ............................ February 8, 2010. 

75,200 ................ RBC Manufacturing Corporation, West Plains Division, 

Regal Beloit Corporation.

West Plains, MO .................... January 27, 2011. 

75,201 ................ Abbott Laboratories, Diagnostics Division; Leased Workers 

from Manpower, Comsys, Apex, etc.

Irving, TX ............................... February 9, 2010. 

75,202 ................ Welco Technologies, Western Sky Division, Electromech 

Technologies, Nesco Services Co.

Maysville, KY ......................... February 9, 2010. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(c) (supplier to a firm whose workers 

are certified eligible to apply for TAA) 

of the Trade Act have been met. 

TA–W number Subject firm Location Impact date 

74,631 ................ General Motors Components Holdings LLC .......................... Lockport, NY .......................... September 26, 2010. 

75,128 ................ Olympic Fabrication, LLC, Sealaska Corporation .................. Shelton, WA ........................... January 20, 2010. 

Negative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

In the following cases, the 

investigation revealed that the eligibility 

criteria for worker adjustment assistance 

have not been met for the reasons 

specified. 

The investigation revealed that the 

criteria under paragraphs(a)(2)(A) 

(increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift 

in production or services to a foreign 

country) of section 222 have not been 

met. 

TA–W number Subject firm Location Impact date 

74,581 ................ CMC Joist and Deck, CMC Joist Fabrication, Inc ................................ New Columbia, PA ........................

74,744 ................ Ingersoll Rand Company, Formerly Trane Company, Residential Solutions.Fort Smith, AR ..............................

74,785 ................ Southeast Missouri Hospital ................................................................. Cape Girardeau, MO ....................

Determinations Terminating 

Investigations of Petitions for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

After notice of the petitions was 

published in the Federal Register and 

on the Department’s Web site, as 

required by Section 221 of the Act (19 

U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated 

investigations of these petitions. 

The following determinations 

terminating investigations were issued 

because the petitioner has requested 

that the petition be withdrawn. 

TA–W number Subject firm Location Impact date 

75,246 ................ Deluxe Laboratories .............................................................................. Hollywood, CA ..............................

75,246A ............. Deluxe Laboratories .............................................................................. Burbank, CA ..................................

The following determinations 

terminating investigations were issued 

because the petitions are the subject of 

ongoing investigations under petitions 

filed earlier covering the same 

petitioners. 


jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
13234 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 47 / Thursday, March 10, 2011 / Notices 

TA–W number Subject firm Location Impact date 

75,213 ................ The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc., EIT/TSS/Application 

Configuration Support Division.

Hartford, CT ..................................

I hereby certify that the 

aforementioned determinations were 

issued during the period of February 22, 

2011 through February 25, 2011. Copies 

of these determinations may be 

requested under the Freedom of 

Information Act. Requests may be 

submitted by fax, courier services, or 

mail to FOIA Disclosure Officer, Office 

of Trade Adjustment Assistance (ETA), 

U.S. Department of Labor, 200 

Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 

DC 20210 or tofoiarequest@dol.gov. 

These determinations also are available 

on the Department’s website at http:// 

www.doleta.gov/tradeact under the 

searchable listing of determinations. 

Dated: March 3, 2011. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2011–5477 Filed 3–9–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Investigations Regarding Certifications 

of Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

Petitions have been filed with the 

Secretary of Labor under Section 221 (a) 

of the Trade Act of 1974 (‘‘the Act’’) and 

are identified in the Appendix to this 

notice. Upon receipt of these petitions, 

the Director of the Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance, Employment 

and Training Administration, has 

instituted investigations pursuant to 

Section 221 (a) of the Act. 

The purpose of each of the 

investigations is to determine whether 

the workers are eligible to apply for 

adjustment assistance under Title II, 

Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations 

will further relate, as appropriate, to the 

determination of the date on which total 

or partial separations began or 

threatened to begin and the subdivision 

of the firm involved. 

The petitioners or any other persons 

showing a substantial interest in the 

subject matter of the investigations may 

request a public hearing, provided such 

request is filed in writing with the 

Director, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance, at the address shown below, 

not later than March 21, 2011. 

Interested persons are invited to 

submit written comments regarding the 

subject matter of the investigations to 

the Director, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance, at the address shown below, 

not later than March 21, 2011. 

The petitions filed in this case are 

available for inspection at the Office of 

the Director, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance, Employment and Training 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Labor, Room N–5428, 200 Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. 

Signed at Washington, DC this 3rd day of 

March 2011. 

Elliott S. Kushner, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

APPENDIX

[6 TAA petitions instituted between 2/22/11 and 2/25/11] 

TA–W Subject firm (petitioners) Location Date of 

institution 

Date of 

petition 

80005 ................ Abbott Laboratories (Company) ........................................... South Pasadena, CA ............ 02/22/11 02/18/11 

80006 ................ Mitel, Inc. (Workers) ............................................................. Chandler, AZ ......................... 02/22/11 02/18/11 

80007 ................ Specialty Shearing and Dyeing Inc. (Company) .................. Greenville, SC ....................... 02/22/11 02/21/11 

80008 ................ Twin County Ford (Workers) ................................................ Woodlawn, VA ...................... 02/23/11 02/22/11 

80009 ................ Carstone Industries, Inc. (Company) ................................... Somerset, KY ........................ 02/23/11 02/22/11 

80010 ................ Durham Manufacturing Company (Company) ..................... Durham, CT .......................... 02/24/11 02/23/11 

[FR Doc. 2011–5472 Filed 3–9–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Investigations Regarding Certifications 

of Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

Petitions have been filed with the 

Secretary of Labor under Section 221 (a) 

of the Trade Act of 1974 (‘‘the Act’’) and 

are identified in the Appendix to this 

notice. Upon receipt of these petitions, 

the Director of the Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance, Employment 

and Training Administration, has 

instituted investigations pursuant to 

Section 221 (a) of the Act. 

The purpose of each of the 

investigations is to determine whether 

the workers are eligible to apply for 

adjustment assistance under Title II, 

Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations 

will further relate, as appropriate, to the 

determination of the date on which total 

or partial separations began or 

threatened to begin and the subdivision 

of the firm involved. 

The petitioners or any other persons 

showing a substantial interest in the 

subject matter of the investigations may 

request a public hearing, provided such 

request is filed in writing with the 

Director, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance, at the address shown below, 

not later than March 21, 2011. 

Interested persons are invited to 

submit written comments regarding the 

subject matter of the investigations to 

the Director, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance, at the address shown below, 

not later than March 21, 2011. 

The petitions filed in this case are 

available for inspection at the Office of 

the Director, Office of Trade Adjustment 


jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES