alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 782 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 782

 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to improve access to 
           mental health services under the Medicare program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 13, 2019

 Ms. Stabenow (for herself and Mr. Barrasso) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to improve access to 
           mental health services under the Medicare program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Improving Access to Mental Health 
Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. IMPROVED ACCESS TO MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES UNDER THE MEDICARE 
              PROGRAM.

    (a) Access to Clinical Social Workers.--Section 1833(a)(1)(F)(ii) 
of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395l(a)(1)(F)(ii)) is amended by 
striking ``75 percent of the amount determined for payment of a 
psychologist under clause (L)'' and inserting ``85 percent of the fee 
schedule amount provided under section 1848''.
    (b) Access to Clinical Social Worker Services Provided to Residents 
of Skilled Nursing Facilities.--
            (1) In general.--Section 1888(e)(2)(A)(ii) of the Social 
        Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395yy(e)(2)(A)(ii)) is amended by 
        inserting ``clinical social worker services,'' after 
        ``qualified psychologist services,''.
            (2) Conforming amendment.--Section 1861(hh)(2) of the 
        Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(hh)(2)) is amended by 
        striking ``and other than services furnished to an inpatient of 
        a skilled nursing facility which the facility is required to 
        provide as a requirement for participation''.
    (c) Access to the Complete Set of Clinical Social Worker 
Services.--Section 1861(hh)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395x(hh)(2)) is further amended by striking ``for the diagnosis and 
treatment of mental illnesses (other than services'' and inserting 
``(including services for the diagnosis and treatment of mental 
illnesses or services for health and behavior assessment and 
intervention (identified as of January 1, 2019, by HCPCS codes 96150 
through 96161 (and any succeeding codes)), but not including 
services''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to items and services furnished on or after January 1, 2020.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2006268EN.01000201.xml

| 4.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 268/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 268/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

1 November 2006

(2006/C 268/02)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2757 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 149,24 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4547 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,66845 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2017 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5880 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 86,57 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3005 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5770 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,066 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 259,34 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6963 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8633 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,5125 |
| SIT | Slovenian tolar | 239,51 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 36,275 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8575 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6480 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4471 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9232 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8976 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9900 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 198,39 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,3850 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,0428 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3612 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 612,06 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6565 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,581 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,0690 |
| THB | Thai baht | 46,763 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2757

JPY

Japanese yen

149,24

DKK

Danish krone

7,4547

GBP

Pound sterling

0,66845

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2017

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5880

ISK

Iceland króna

86,57

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3005

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5770

CZK

Czech koruna

28,066

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

259,34

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6963

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8633

RON

Romanian leu

3,5125

SIT

Slovenian tolar

239,51

SKK

Slovak koruna

36,275

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8575

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6480

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4471

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9232

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8976

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9900

KRW

South Korean won

1 198,39

ZAR

South African rand

9,3850

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,0428

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3612

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 612,06

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6565

PHP

Philippine peso

63,581

RUB

Russian rouble

34,0690

THB

Thai baht

46,763

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72 -70

 34

 36

 38

 40

 42

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

06/18

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 18 Jun 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.46 N 76.63 W Meters AGL
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Memorandum regarding communication with Under Secretary Polly Trottenberg and Denise Richardson and Chris Boylan of the Associated General Contractors of New York and representatives from two major construction firms relating to USDOT?s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) on ?Disadvantaged Business Enterprise: Program Implementation Modifications.?
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1998, AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           2,727
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   74,820
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,081
<INVENTORY>                                    154,493
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               249,094
<PP&E>                                         140,584
<DEPRECIATION>                                 193,517
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 520,080
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           81,526
<BONDS>                                         30,540
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     31,827
<COMMON>                                           240
<OTHER-SE>                                   (122,554)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   520,080
<SALES>                                        364,407
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               364,407
<CGS>                                          243,497
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  243,497
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               143,838
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,413
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,605
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (46,533)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,120
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (48,351)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (48,351)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               (2.09)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2007069EN.01001602.xml

| 24.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/16

---

Action brought on 14 February 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-83/07)

(2007/C 69/38)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Konstantinidis and J.-B. Laignelot)

Applicant:

Defendant: the Hellenic Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought:

The Court is asked to:

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/12/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 amending Directive 94/62/EC on packaging and packaging waste, and in any event by failing to inform the Commission thereof, the Hellenic Republic has infringed its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/12/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 amending Directive 94/62/EC on packaging and packaging waste, and in any event by failing to inform the Commission thereof, the Hellenic Republic has infringed its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The time-limit for transposing Directive 2004/12/EC into national law expired on 18.8.2005.

---

(1)  OJ L 47, 18.2.2004, p. 26.

1

---
Table of Contents - Holding Companies Handbook 

Office of Thrift Supervision March 2009 Table of Contents i 

Section 100 – Supervisory Approach

This section outlines OTS’s supervisory approach to holding companies. It provides a historic perspective 

on holding company regulation, and outlines our authority. 

Section 200 – Administration 

This section sets forth the more procedural aspects of scoping and performing an examination. The 

classification of holding companies into risk category is covered, as well as rating, examination and report 

requirements. 

• Appendix 200A – Holding Company PERK 

• Appendix 200B – Continuous Supervision 

• Appendix 200C – HC Report of Examination 

Section 300 – Capital 

This section outlines the factors, including debt, relevant to capital that examiners will review in determining 

its adequacy. 

• Appendix 300A – Hybrid Instruments 

Section 400 – Organizational Structure 

This section provides guidance in identifying and assessing the risk of non-thrift activities and investments of 

the holding company enterprise. Issues regarding ownership of the thrift are also addressed within this 

section. 

 

• Appendix 400A – Joint Agency Statement on Parallel-Owned Banking Organization Structure 

• Appendix 400B – List of Permissible Savings and Loan Holding Company Activities 

• Appendix 400C - Interagency Policy Statement on Income Tax Allocation in a Holding Company 

Structure 

Section 500 – Risk Management 

This section places an emphasis on the ability of the directors and senior management to identify, measure, 

monitor, and control risk. It also describes the four risk management elements to be reviewed in the 

examination process. 
Table of Contents – Holding Companies Handbook 

ii Table of Contents March 2009 Office of Thrift Supervision 

Section 600 – Earnings 

This section addresses the earnings and profitability, liquidity, and cash flow aspects of the financial analysis 

of a holding company. 

Section 700 – Holding Company Programs 

• Section 710 – Holding Company Administrative Program 

• Section 720 – Abbreviated Holding Company Examination Program 

• Section 730 – CORE Holding Company Examination Program 

Section 800 – Off-site Monitoring 

Section 900 – Specialized Holding Company Populations 

• Section 910 – HOLA 10(l)s 

• Section 920 – Mutual Holding Companies 

• Section 930 – Insurance Holding Companies 

⎯ Appendix 930A – Industry Background 

⎯ Appendix 930B – State Regulation 

⎯ Appendix 930C – A. M. Best 

• Section 940 – Large and Complex Enterprises (Conglomerates)

⎯ Appendix 940A – Financial Activities in the European Union

⎯ Appendix 940B – Methods to Assess Capital Adequacy

⎯ Appendix 940C – Prudential Treatment of Minority and Majority Interests in Subsidiaries
**Exhibit 21.01**

 

UFPTechnologies, Inc. (“UFPT”) wholly owns the following companies:

 

1.               Moulded FibreTechnology, Inc. (“MFT”), a Maine company

2.               SimcoTechnologies, Inc. (“Simco”), a Michigan company

3.               Simco Automotive Trim, Inc. (“SAT”), aMichigan company (wholly-owned by Simco)

4.               Stephenson &Lawyer, Inc. (“S&L”), a Michigan company

5.               PattersonProperties Corporation, a Michigan company (wholly-owned by S&L)

 

----
From: Jones, Danielle [ mailto:Danielle_Y_Jones@omb.eop.gov ]

Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2016 3:44 PM
To: Cogliano, Gerain < Cogliano.Gerain@epa.gov > Subject: RMP Comment on feasibility Attachment:

Hi Gerain,

Attached is OSHA’s language recommendation for the term feasibility.

Please let me know if the program area would like to set up a call to discuss.

Best, Danielle

Danielle Y. Jones Policy Analyst Office of Management and Budget Phone: (202) 395

- 1741 | djones@omb.eop.govAttachment: feasibility.docx

Insert for page 93 of the EO 12866 RMP draft

EPA is also proposing to require owners or operators to evaluate the feasibility of implementing any IST or ISD considered. EPA believes a feasibility analysis of any considered IST or ISD is necessary to ensure the facility owner or operator seriously con siders whether IST or ISD modifications could further reduce risks and prevent accidents at the facility.

EPA is proposing to use the term “feasibility” to describe this analysis because, as described
above

, it is already widely used in the IST field. Ho wever, this term has a distinct meaning under the Occupational Safety and Health Act , where the courts look to whether a safety measure is capable of being done, see American Textile Mfrs. Inst. v. Donovan, 452 U.S. 490, 509 (1981); Seaworld of Florida,

LL C v. Perez, 748 F.3d 1202, 1215 (D.C. Cir

. 2013) . In the enforcement context, this means that technical
know

- how about materials and methods are available or adaptable to specific circumstances, which when applied create a reasonable possibility that empl oyee exposure to occupational hazards will be
reduced , and that the firm is financially able to implement the measure without severe adverse
economic effect. OSHA CPL 02

- 00

- 159, Field Operations Manual 3

- 22 (2015); Avco n, Inc., 23 O.S.H. Cas. (BNA) 1440
, 1454 n.24 (O.S.H.R.C. Apr. 5, 2011)

. OSHA has indicated that it would be unable to adopt the term feasibility under its PSM standard as defined in this proposal. Because of the potential for confusion, EPA solicits comment on whether it would be better i f EPA used another term, such as “practicability” for this analysis

.
EPA is not proposing to require sources affected by this provision to implement an evaluated IST or ISD because the decision to implement such measures must consider the numerous fact ors related to processes, facilities, and society at large. Improper implementation of a seemingly safer alternative may lead to undesired consequences. EPA believes that only qualified facility personnel should choose the
best measures that can reduce the risk of an accident at the facility. This decision should be based on a careful analysis and take into account: the chemicals present and their associated hazards; the operations and process conditions involved; and the types of equipment used that are sp ecific to the facility’s process. Commented [ECB1]: OSHA Insert
#### The Attorney-General ex rel. Easton and McMahon *vs.*The New York and Long Branch Railroad Company.

A rehearing will not be granted, unless the court sees some reason to apprehend that a mistake in law or in fact has been made in the decision

An application for a preliminary injunction having been denied in this case, a motion was made for a rehearing of that application.

*Mr. Gilchrist,*Attorney-General, and *Mr. T. N. McCarter,*for the motion.

*Mr. F. Williamson*and *Mr. F. T. Frelinghuysen,*contra.

The Chancellor.

I should not hesitate to grant the rehearing asked for, if, in my judgment, justice- to the parties or to the cause demanded it. The merits of the case were very fully and very *60ably discussed and presented to the court, by the distinguished counsel who represented the parties, and I do not think that any important consideration in favor of the complainants or defendants failed to receive the attention, either of court or counsel. The various particulars in which it was apprehended that difficulty would or might arise to the navigation of the river, from either the location or the construction of the bridge, were considered, and the court, after a very full and deliberate consideration, reached the conclusion that the case was one in which an interlocutory injunction ought not to be granted. After reviewing the case in the light of the arguments and suggestions of the complainants’ counsel on this motion, I see no reason to apprehend that a mistake in law or in fact has been made in the decision • and for the reasons given in the opinion on refusing the injunction, I am satisfied I ought not to grant a rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
EXHIBIT 27.5:  RESTATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's February 28, 1997 Form 10-K and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0000016918
<NAME> CANANDAIGUA BRANDS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1997
<CASH>                                          10,010
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  142,592
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    326,626
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               501,015
<PP&E>                                         355,968
<DEPRECIATION>                                 106,416
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,020,901
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          246,573
<BONDS>                                        338,884
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           214
<OTHER-SE>                                     364,519
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,020,901
<SALES>                                      1,135,013
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,135,013
<CGS>                                          844,181
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  844,181
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              34,050
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 47,791
<INCOME-TAX>                                    20,116
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             27,675
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    27,675
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.42
        


</TABLE>
BEFORE SHE MAKES PLANS 

WITH FRIENDS...

Establish some family rules for social and extracurricular 

activities.

Kids don’t always have all the facts when it comes to alcohol 

and other drugs. Talk with your child about the risks of underage 

drinking and substance use, and be clear and consistent about 

your expectations. For tips on how—and when—to begin the 

conversation, visit 

www.underagedrinking.samhsa.gov

#TalkTheyHearYou PEP20-03-01-052
HELP YOUR KIDS STAY SAFE, BEYOND THE 

KITCHEN.

Teach them to make safe choices every day.

Marijuana can be harmful for a child’s growing brain. It’s important to talk with your children from a 

young age about what marijuana is and how it can be harmful to their developing brain. For tips on 

how—and when—to begin the conversation, visit: 

www.underagedrinking.samhsa.gov

SMA-18-5088PSTCRD
### SUBCHAPTER CXXXVI—FORT STANTON-SNOWY RIVER CAVE NATIONAL CONSERVATION AREA
#### § 367.4020 Account 402, Maintenance expense.

There must be shown under this caption the total amount included in the service company maintenance expense accounts 500 through 598 (§§ 367.5000 through 367.5890), 800 through 894 (§§ 367.8000 through 367.8810), and 935 (§ 367.9350).