alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.41

                                THIRD AMENDMENT
                                       TO

                     DISTRIBUTION AND FULFILLMENT AGREEMENT

     THIS Third Amendment to Distribution and Fulfillment Agreement (the "Fourth
Amendment") is entered into as of the 12th day of February, 1999, between
CellStar Ltd., a Texas limited partnership ("CellStar"), and Topp Telecom, Inc.,
a Florida corporation ("Topp").

                              W I T N E S S E T H:
                              ------------------- 

     WHEREAS, CellStar and Topp are parties to that certain Distribution and
Fulfillment Agreement, dated as of September 15, 1997, as amended by that
certain Amendment to Distribution Agreement, dated as of September 1, 1998, and
further amended as set forth in that certain Amendment to September 1st Letter
Agreement, dated as of December 18, 1998 (collectively the "Agreement"); and

     WHEREAS, CellStar and Topp desire to further amend the Agreement upon the
terms and conditions as hereinafter set forth;

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants and
conditions herein contained, and other good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Topp and CellStar agree
as follows:

     1.  The Agreement is hereby amended to convert the Agreement from an
exclusive agreement to a non-exclusive agreement.

     2.  Topp is hereby released from its obligation to have all telephones that
will be activated on its TracFone program originate from shipments by CellStar.

     3.  It is the intention of the parties to amend and restate the Agreement
within the next twenty business days. Until such amended and restated agreement
is executed by the parties, except as may be expressly modified hereby, all
other covenants, terms and conditions contained in the Agreement shall remain in
full force and effect.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of
the date first above written.

CELLSTAR, LTD.                                  TOPP TELECOM, INC.
 
By:  NATIONAL AUTO CENTER, INC.
 
 
By: /s/ ELAINE FLUD RODRIGUEZ                   /s/ F.J. POLLAK
    ---------------------------------           --------------------------------
    Name:  Elaine Flud Rodriguez                Name:  F.J. Pollak
    Title: Vice President                       Title: President
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. 1

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-11221 Summary Calendar

JOHNNY SPENCER, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus
ADVANCED TELEMARKETING CORP., Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:97-CV-1225-G June 26, 1998 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Johnny Spencer appeals the dismissal without prejudice of his age and disability discrimination action for failure to prosecute pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 41(b). The evidence on record shows that Spencer did not comply with the magistrate judge’s orders requiring him to notify the court of any address change. As a result, the district court2

could not schedule a hearing to inquire into the factual and legal basis for his claim, in accordance with Spears v. McCotter , 766 F.2d 179, 181-82 (5th Cir. 1985) (establishing courtroom hearing as substitute for motion for more definite statement in
pro se cases), overruled on other grounds sub nom. Neitzke v. Williams , 490 U.S. 319, 324 (1989). AFFIRMED.
Live Read Radio scripts – English and Spanish

Underage Drinking Prevention National Media Campaign

“Talk. They Hear You.” 

:15 Live Read Script ENGLISH

ANNCR:	Too many pre-teens are already drinking alcohol.  For tips on how to talk to your kids, visit Talk. They Hear You. at www.underagedrinking.S-A-M-H-S-A.gov.  That’s underagedrinking.S-A-M-H-S-A.gov.

 “Talk. They Hear You.” 

:30 Live Read Script ENGLISH

ANNCR:	An alarming number of pre-teens are already drinking alcohol.  Which makes it urgent to find every opportunity to talk to your kids about the dangers of underage drinking.  They really do hear you.  For tips on what to say, visit underagedrinking.SAMHSA.gov.  That’s www.underagedrinking.S-A-M-H-S-A.gov.   Talk.  They Hear You.  A public service message from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. 

“Talk. They Hear You.” 

:15 Live Read Script SPANISH

ANNCR:	Demasiados preadolescentes ya beben alcohol. Para obtener consejos sobre cómo hablarles a sus hijos, visite el sitio “Hable”. “Ellos lo escuchan”, en “underagedrinking punto S-A-M-H-S-A punto gov”.

“Talk. They Hear You.” Radio

:30 Live Read Script SPANISH

ANNCR:	Una cantidad alarmante de preadolescentes ya beben alcohol. Por eso es urgente que aproveche toda oportunidad para hablarles a sus hijos sobre los peligros del consumo de alcohol entre menores. Ellos realmente lo escuchan. Para obtener consejos sobre qué decir, visite underagedrinking punto S-A-M-H-S-A punto gov. Hable. Ellos lo escuchan. Un mensaje de servicio público de la Administración de Servicios de Abuso de Sustancias y Salud Mental. 

2

# image1.png
#### § 367.9310 Account 931, Rents.

This account must include rents, including taxes, paid for the property of others used, occupied or operated in connection with service company functions. Provide subaccounts for major groupings such as office space, warehouses, other structure, office furniture, fixtures, computers, data processing equipment, microwave and telecommunication equipment, airplanes, automobiles, and other similar groupings of property. The cost, when incurred by the lessee, of operating and maintaining leased property, must be charged to the accounts appropriate for the expense as if the property were owned.
#### § 376.102 Organization.

The Commission is established as an independent regulatory Commission within the DOE by the DOE Act. The Commission is composed of five members appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. One of the members is designated by the President as the Chairman. To carry out its mission and functions, the Chairman has organized the Commission into a number of major offices, some of which are further organized into divisions and lower units. The organization of the Commission staff structure may be obtained from the Division of Public Information.
§ 3b.3 Notice requirements. ( a ) The Commission will publish at least annually in the Federal Register a notice identifying the systems of records currently maintained by the Commission. For each system of records, the notice will include the following information: ( 1 ) The name and location of the system;
( 2 ) The categories of individuals on whom records are maintained in the system;
( 3 ) The categories of records maintained in the system;
( 4 ) The specific statutory provision or executive order, or rule or regulation issued pursuant thereto, authorizing the maintenance of the information contained in the system;
( 5 ) Each routine use of the records contained in the system, including the categories of users and the purposes of such use;
( 6 ) The policies and practices regarding the storage, retrievability, access controls, and retention and disposal of the records;
( 7 ) The title and business address of the Commission official who is responsible for the system of records;
( 8 ) The procedures whereby an individual can be notified at his request if the system of records contains a record pertaining to him;
( 9 ) The procedures whereby an individual can be notified at his request how he can gain access to any record pertaining to him contained in the system of records, and how he can contest its contents; and
( 10 ) The categories of sources of records in the system.
( b ) At least thirty days prior to its operation, the Commission will publish in the Federal Register a notice of its intention to establish a new system of records reciting the information required pursuant to paragraphs (a) (1) through (10) of this section and notice of any major change to an existing system.
( c ) The Commission will publish in the Federal Register a notice of its intention to establish any new or intended routine use of the information in an existing system of records at least thirty days prior to the disclosure of the record for that routine use. A new routine use is one which involves disclosure of records for a new purpose compatible with the purpose for which the record is maintained or which involves disclosure to a new recipient or category of recipients. At a minimum, the notice will contain the following information: ( 1 ) The name of the system of records for which the routine use is to be established;
( 2 ) The authority authorizing the maintenance of the information contained in the system;
( 3 ) The categories of records maintained in the system;
( 4 ) The proposed routine use(s);
( 5 ) The categories of recipients for each proposed routine use; and
( 6 ) Reference to the public notice in the Federal Register under which the existing system had already been published.
§ 4.200 Applicability. This part applies to any application for amendment of a license, if the applicant seeks to: ( a ) Make a change in the physical features of the project or its boundary, or make an addition, betterment, abandonment, or conversion, of such character as to constitute an alteration of the license;
( b ) Make a change in the plans for the project under license; or
( c ) Extend the time fixed in the license for commencement or completion of project works.
[Order 184, 46 FR 55943, Nov. 13, 1981, as amended by Order 2002, 68 FR 51121, Aug. 25, 2003]
Instructions on how to edit or delete a returned continuation application Page 1 of 9

Editing or Deleting a Returned Continuation Application

Reference Sheet 

Purpose 

The purpose of this document is to provide the steps on how a SAMHSA grantee edits or deletes a 

continuation application. This is only available if a continuation has been submitted and if the SAMHSA 

staff has returned the continuation application back to the grantee. In this case, an email notification 

will let the grantee know that the continuation application has been returned and whether the 

application needs to be edited or deleted. 

Follow section I to edit.

Follow section II to delete.

Section I - Editing a continuation application 

1. Log in to Commons
Instructions on how to edit or delete a returned continuation application Page 2 of 9

2. Click Non-Research Tab

3. Click Manage Continuations
Instructions on how to edit or delete a returned continuation application Page 3 of 9

4. (SO only) Enter search criteria and search for grant. PDs will be taken directly to a view of the all 

of their grants so do not need to search.

5. Click View for the appropriate grant
Instructions on how to edit or delete a returned continuation application Page 4 of 9

6. Under the action(s) column choose to Edit your continuation. This will bring you to the 

application in ASSIST.

7. Click Update Submission Status. A new pop-up will open.
Instructions on how to edit or delete a returned continuation application Page 5 of 9

8. Select Work in Progress in the dropdown and either click “or continue without adding a 

comment.” or enter a comment and click Add comment.

9. Edit and submit the application like normal.
Instructions on how to edit or delete a returned continuation application Page 6 of 9

Section II - Deleting a continuation application 

Note: to delete an application you must be an SO with the grantee organization.

1. Log in to Commons 

2. Click Non-Research Tab 
Instructions on how to edit or delete a returned continuation application Page 7 of 9

3. Click Manage Continuations 

4. (SO only) enter search criteria and search for grant. PDs will be taken directly to a view of the all 

of their grants so do not need to search.
Instructions on how to edit or delete a returned continuation application Page 8 of 9

5. Click View for the appropriate grant. This will take you to the Continuations: View page.

6. Under the action(s) column choose to Edit your continuation. This will bring you to the 

application in ASSIST. 
Instructions on how to edit or delete a returned continuation application Page 9 of 9

7. Click Delete Application

8. Click Continue in the popup warning.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-4268

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

KATIE WHITEHEAD MOORE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief

District Judge. (CR-03-68)

Submitted: November 17, 2005 Decided: November 22, 2005

Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, Stephen C. Gordon,

Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellant. Frank D. Whitney, United States Attorney, Anne M.

Hayes, Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorneys,

Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Katie Whitehead Moore appeals the sentence imposed upon

her conviction for aiding and assisting in the preparation of false

income tax returns in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7206(2) (2000).

Moore asserts that the sentence was unreasonable under this court’s

decision in United States v. Hughes, 401 F.3d 540, 547 (4th Cir.

2005) because the court relied “exclusively” on the sentencing

range as determined by the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual

(2004).

The district court considered both the advisory guideline

range and the factors set out in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) (2000) in

determining Moore’s sentence. We conclude that Moore’s sentence is

reasonable. We therefore affirm the district court’s judgment. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 31.b

I, Marc N. Teal, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund Limited Partnership;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



1. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





1. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|Date:  February 14, 2008 | /s/ Marc N. Teal                         
|------------------------ | -----------------------------------------
|                         | Marc N. Teal,
Principal Financial Officer
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:Sheriffs� departments.**** 
SuDocNumber:J29.2:SH 5/
ItemNumber:0717-R-01(online)
CGPSystem Number:000369127
 
1990
1993
1997
 
 **
### §8325. International harmonization

(a) In order to promote effective and consistent global regulation of swaps and security-based swaps, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the prudential regulators (as that term is defined in section 1a(39) of title 7), as appropriate, shall consult and coordinate with foreign regulatory authorities on the establishment of consistent international standards with respect to the regulation (including fees) of swaps, security-based swaps, swap entities, and security-based swap entities and may agree to such information-sharing arrangements as may be deemed to be necessary or appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of investors, swap counterparties, and security-based swap counterparties.

(b) In order to promote effective and consistent global regulation of contracts of sale of a commodity for future delivery and options on such contracts, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission shall consult and coordinate with foreign regulatory authorities on the establishment of consistent international standards with respect to the regulation of contracts of sale of a commodity for future delivery and options on such contracts, and may agree to such information-sharing arrangements as may be deemed necessary or appropriate in the public interest for the protection of users of contracts of sale of a commodity for future delivery.

(Pub. L. 111–203, title VII, §752, July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 1749.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definition

For definition of "including" as used in this section, see section 5301 of Title 12, Banks and Banking.
(38 South. 964.)

No. 15,574.

#### SCHUTTEN v. SCHAFFHAUSEN et al.

(June 19, 1905.)

APPEAL — JURISDICTION—TRAN SEER TO COURT OE APPEAL.

Case transferred to the Court of Appeal, under Act No. 56 of 1904; the Supreme Court having "no jurisdiction.

(Syllabus by the Court.) '

Appeal from Eighteenth Judicial District Court, Parish of Acadia; Robert Montgomery, Judge ad hoc.

Action by Joseph Sehutten against Joseph Schaffhausen and others.

Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals. Transferred to Court of Appeal.

Hampden Story and Joseph Quintero Gowland, for appellant. Lewis & Smith, for appellees.

NICHOLLS, J.

Plaintiff’s demand is for a moneyed judgment against Schaffhausen, coupled with one to have set aside as a fraudulent simulation a sale of land, with improvements thereon, in the town of Rayne, made by Schaffhausen to Philip Schenkel on the 26th of March, 1901, by act before A. C. Lormand, notary public.

The district court rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff on the money demand against Schaffhausen, but rejected that seeking to have the sale to Schenkel set aside. He appealed from the latter portion of the judgment.

On the 5th of June, 1905, plaintiff’s attorney filed in this court an application praying the court to transfer this cause, together with the transcript therein, to the Court of Appeal of the Third circuit, parish of Acadia. The application is based upon an affidavit of counsel to the effect that, since the filing of the transcript and brief in the Supreme Court, he had discovered that it was without jurisdiction, the amount involved being less than $2,000; that the error occurred through inadvertence, and without the purpose of hindering or delaying the determination in said court; that the cause was brought to this court in error, and not for delay.

We do not understand appellee to controvert th^, facts stated or to make opposition to the transfer under Act No. 56 of 1904. We will accordingly grant the application and transfer the cause, hut it will have to be tried upon the original record now in the Acadia court. The transcript which has been filed in this court must remain here as part of its archives.

For the reasons herein assigned, it is hereby ordered that this cause be transferred to the Court of Appeal, Third circuit, for the parish of Acadia, to be therein proceeded with according to law; costs of this appeal to he borne by appellant.
#### § 590.320 How to file an appeal inspection or decision review.

The request for an appeal inspection or review of inspection program personnel's decision may be made orally or in writing. If made orally, written confirmation may be required. The applicant must clearly identify the product involved, the decision being appealed, and the reasons for requesting the appeal.

[85 FR 68676, Oct. 29, 2020]