alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 13

- 00083

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF K.C.B., MINOR CHILD

On Appeal from the County Court at Law Hopkins County, Texas Trial Court No. 37,125 CCL

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.2 

### O RDER
The Hopkins County District Clerk has filed a motion requesting permission to file a supplemental clerk’s record in this case in paper rather than electronic form. Effective January 1, 2014, the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure require all records filed with appellate courts after that date to be filed electronically. Appendix C, which governs the preparat ion of clerk’s records, states, “Unless the clerk receives permission from the appellate court to file the record in paper form, the clerk must file the record electronically.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P. app. C, Rule
1.2. As an initial matter, we point out that this Court’s staff must convert all records received in paper form to electronic form prior to filing. Thus, a district clerk’s failure to comply with the Rules, which are applicable statewide, creates an additional workload for the staff of this Court. Elect ronic filing with this Court requires some very basic tools

— a computer, a scanner, an appropriate software package (such as Adobe Acrobat), and internet access

— all of which are easily obtainable and relatively affordable. The Office of Court Administratio n is available to assist trial

- level clerk’s offices with the transition from paper to electronic filing. To obtain this assistance, contact Casey Kennedy (casey.kennedy@txcourts.gov), who can provide information about the easiest and least expensive way to set up a compliant system. We expect Hopkins County to begin electronically filing records with this Court as soon as possible, but under no circumstances should the transformation from paper to electronic filing remain incomplete beyond March 31, 2014.3 The motion to file the supplemental clerk’s record in paper form in this specific case is granted. Requests to file documents in paper form in other matters will be handled on a case

- by

case, filing

- by

- filing basis.

BY THE COURT Date: January 22, 2014
#### § 381.5 Publications.

Publications under the Act and the regulations shall be made in the Federal Register and in such other media as the Administrator may designate.
ATTACHMENT 37: ECOSAR Modeling

RI
O

O

H 3 C

C H 3

 ECOSAR Version 1.11 Results Page

 SMILES : O(COC)C

 CHEM : 

 CAS Num: 109-87-5

 ChemID1: 

 MOL FOR: C3 H8 O2 

 MOL WT : 76.10

 Log Kow: -0.195 (EPISuite Kowwin v1.68 Estimate)

 Log Kow: (User Entered)

 Log Kow: 0.00 (PhysProp DB exp value - for comparison only)

 Melt Pt: (User Entered for Wat Sol estimate)

 Melt Pt: -104.80 (deg C, PhysProp DB exp value for Wat Sol est)

 Wat Sol: 2.165E+005 (mg/L, EPISuite WSKowwin v1.43 Estimate)

 Wat Sol: (User Entered)

 Wat Sol: 2.44E+005 (mg/L, PhysProp DB exp value)

 --------------------------------------

 Values used to Generate ECOSAR Profile

 --------------------------------------

 Log Kow: -0.195 (EPISuite Kowwin v1.68 Estimate)

 Wat Sol: 2.44E+005 (mg/L, PhysProp DB exp value)

 ------------------------------------------------

 Available Measured Data from ECOSAR Training Set

 ------------------------------------------------

 Measured

 CAS No Organism Duration End Pt mg/L (ppm) Ecosar Class Reference

 =========== ========== ========== ====== ========== =========================== ===============

 000109-87-5 Fish 96-hr LC50 6990 Neutral organics DUL

 --------------------------------------

 ECOSAR v1.11 Class-specific Estimations

 --------------------------------------

 Neutral Organics

 Predicted

 ECOSAR Class Organism Duration End Pt mg/L (ppm)

 =========================== ================== ======== ====== ==========

 Neutral Organics : Fish 96-hr LC50 5850.624

 Neutral Organics : Daphnid 48-hr LC50 2712.605

 Neutral Organics : Green Algae 96-hr EC50 874.122

 Neutral Organics : Fish ChV 450.281

 Neutral Organics : Daphnid ChV 150.500

 Neutral Organics : Green Algae ChV 145.770

 Neutral Organics : Fish (SW) 96-hr LC50 7269.347

 Neutral Organics : Mysid 96-hr LC50 23896.535

 Neutral Organics : Fish (SW) ChV 206.542

 Neutral Organics : Mysid (SW) ChV 3958.390

 Neutral Organics : Earthworm 14-day LC50 223.446

 Note: * = asterisk designates: Chemical may not be soluble enough to

RI
 measure this predicted effect. If the effect level exceeds the

 water solubility by 10X, typically no effects at saturation (NES)

 are reported.

 ------------------------------

 Class Specific LogKow Cut-Offs

 ------------------------------

 If the log Kow of the chemical is greater than the endpoint specific cut-offs

 presented below, then no effects at saturation are expected for those endpoints.

 Neutral Organics:

 ----------------

 Maximum LogKow: 5.0 (Fish 96-hr LC50; Daphnid LC50, Mysid LC50)

 Maximum LogKow: 6.0 (Earthworm LC50)

 Maximum LogKow: 6.4 (Green Algae EC50)

 Maximum LogKow: 8.0 (ChV)

RI
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

1. The Finance Company, a Virginia corporation (100%).

   a. The Insurance Agency, Inc., a Virginia corporation owned 100% by The
      Finance Company.

   b. TFC Receivables Corporation, a Virginia corporation owned 100% by The
      Finance Company.

   c. TFC Receivables Corporation IV, a Delaware corporation owned 100% by The
      Finance Company.

   d. TFC Receivables Corporation V, a Delaware corporation owned 100% by The
      Finance Company.

   e. TFC Receivables Corporation VI, a Delaware corporation owned 100% by The
      Finance Company.

   f. TFC Warehouse Corporation I, a Delaware corporation owned 100% by The
      Finance Company.

2. First Community Finance, Inc., a Virginia corporation (100%).

3. Recoveries, Inc., a Virginia corporation (100%).

4. PC Acceptance.com, Inc., a Virginia corporation (100%).
**EXHIBIT 21**

**SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT**

Citizens and Farmers Bank, incorporated in Virginia 

C&F Mortgage Corporation, incorporated in Virginia 

Hometown Settlement Services LLC, organized in Virginia 

Certified Appraisals LLC, organized in Virginia

Foundation Home Mortgage LLC, organized in Virginia 

C&F Reinsurance LTD, organized in Turks & Caicos Islands 

C&F Title Agency, Inc.,incorporated in Virginia 

C&F Finance Company, incorporated in Virginia 

C&F Investment Services, Inc., incorporated in Virginia 

C&F Insurance Services, Inc., incorporated in Virginia 

C&F Financial Statutory Trust I, organized in Delaware

C&F Financial Statutory Trust II, organized in Delaware
# C_2012366EN.01003102.xml

| 24.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 366/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 366/31

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 October 2012 — Sviluppo Globale v Commission

(Case T-183/10) (1)

1

(Public service contracts - Public procurement procedure - Supply of technical assistance to the Government of Syria - Rejection of the tender - Duty to state reasons)

2012/C 366/59

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Sviluppo Globale GEIE (Rome, Italy) (represented by: F. Sciaudone, R. Sciaudone and A. Neri, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Erlbacher, acting as Agent, and P. Manzini, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for annulment of the Commission’s decision of 14 February 2010 not to accept the tender submitted by the consortium led by the applicant in the restricted procedure EuropeAid/129038/C/SER/SY for the supply to the Syrian Government of technical assistance services designed to facilitate decentralisation and local development (OJ 2010 2009/S 223 319862)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the Commission’s decision of 14 February 2010 not to accept the tender submitted by the consortium led by the applicant in the restricted procedure EuropeAid/129038/C/SER/SY for the supply to the Syrian Government of technical assistance services designed to facilitate decentralisation and local development (OJ 2010 2009/S 223 319862); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the Commission’s decision of 14 February 2010 not to accept the tender submitted by the consortium led by the applicant in the restricted procedure EuropeAid/129038/C/SER/SY for the supply to the Syrian Government of technical assistance services designed to facilitate decentralisation and local development (OJ 2010 2009/S 223 319862);

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Sviluppo Globale GEIE. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Sviluppo Globale GEIE.

---

(1)  OJ C 179, 3.7.2010.

1

---
### §7423. No additional funds authorized

No additional funds are authorized to carry out this Act, and the amendments made by this Act. This Act, and the amendments made by this Act, shall be carried out using amounts otherwise authorized or appropriated.

(Pub. L. 113–274, §4, Dec. 18, 2014, 128 Stat. 2972.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, and the amendments made by this Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 113–274, Dec. 18, 2014, 128 Stat. 2971, which enacted this chapter and amended sections 272, 278g–3, 7403, and 7406 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 7421 of this title and Tables.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR EN BANC RECONSIDERATION

Appellate case name: Renato Acain, et al. v. International Plant Services, LLC, Noureddine 

Ayed, Karim Ayed, Richard Dale Johnston, Adrienne Wilson, and 

Leysander Bustamonte

Appellate case number: 01-13-00310-CV

Trial court case number: 2011-32519

Trial court: 113th District Court of Harris County

It is ordered that Appellees’ Motion for En Banc Reconsideration is denied.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle

 Acting for the En Banc Court*

Date: December 4, 2014

*En banc court consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings, Keyes, Higley, Bland, 

Sharp, Massengale, Brown, and Huddle.
June 30 , 2015

Mr. C harles W. Davis

1711 Bates St

Midland, TX 79707

Dear Mr. Davis :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we c an not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your March 26 , exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

- 0779 ),

but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does no t

comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any

further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why the exemption would no t adversely affect safety or how the ex emption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your req uest any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

/ s/

Brenda Robeson

Program Analyst , Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
NOTICE OF OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET ACTION 

Date 03/02/2022 

Department of Health and Human Services 

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services 

FOR CERTIFYING OFFICIAL: George Chambers 

FOR CLEARANCE OFFICER: Terry Clark 

In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, OMB has taken action on your request received 

01/06/2022 

ACTION REQUESTED: Revision of a currently approved collection 

TYPE OF REVIEW REQUESTED: Regular 

ICR REFERENCE NUMBER: 202201-0930-001 

AGENCY ICR TRACKING NUMBER: 

TITLE: Community MH Services BG and SAPT BG Application Guidance and Instructions FY 2022-2023 

LIST OF INFORMATION COLLECTIONS: See next page 

OMB ACTION: Approved without change 

OMB CONTROL NUMBER: 0930-0168 

The agency is required to display the OMB Control Number and inform respondents of its legal significance in 

accordance with 5 CFR 1320.5(b). 

EXPIRATION DATE: 03/31/2025 DISCONTINUE DATE: 

BURDEN: RESPONSES HOURS COSTS 

Previous 119 33,374 0 

New 119 33,493 0 

Difference

 Change due to New Statute 0 0 0

 Change due to Agency Discretion 0 119 0

 Change due to Agency Adjustment 0 0 0

 Change due to PRA Violation 0 0 0 

TERMS OF CLEARANCE: 

OMB Authorizing Official: Dominic J. Mancini 

Deputy Administrator, 

Office Of Information And Regulatory Affairs 
List of ICs 

IC Title Form No. Form Name CFR Citation 

Block Grant Application FFY 2022-2023 Block Grant 

Application 

FFY 2022-2023 Block Grant 

Application
### §8801. Definitions

In this chapter:

#### (1) Advisory Committee

The term "Advisory Committee" means the National Quantum Initiative Advisory Committee established under section 8814(a) of this title.

#### (2) Appropriate committees of Congress

The term "appropriate committees of Congress" means—

(A) the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate;

(B) the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate; and

(C) the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives.

#### (3) Coordination Office

The term "Coordination Office" means the National Quantum Coordination Office established under section 8812(a) of this title.

#### (4) Institution of higher education

The term "institution of higher education" has the meaning given the term in section 1001(a) of title 20.

#### (5) Program

The term "Program" means the National Quantum Initiative Program implemented under section 8811(a) of this title.

#### (6) Quantum information science

The term "quantum information science" means the use of the laws of quantum physics for the storage, transmission, manipulation, computing, or measurement of information.

#### (7) Quantum network infrastructure

The term "quantum network infrastructure" means any facility, expertise, or capability that is necessary to enable the development and deployment of scalable and diverse quantum network technologies.

#### (8) 1 Subcommittee on Economic and Security Implications

The term "Subcommittee on Economic and Security Implications" means the Subcommittee on the Economic and Security Implications of Quantum Information Science established under section 8814a(a) of this title.

#### (8) 1 Subcommittee on Quantum Information Science

The term "Subcommittee on Quantum Information Science" means the Subcommittee on Quantum Information Science of the National Science and Technology Council established under section 8813(a) of this title.

(Pub. L. 115–368, §2, Dec. 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 5092; Pub. L. 117–81, div. F, title LXVI, §6606(c)(1), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2443; Pub. L. 117–167, div. B, title I, §10104(b)(1), Aug. 9, 2022, 136 Stat. 1437.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2022—Pars. (7), (8). Pub. L. 117–167 added par. (7) and redesignated former par. (7) relating to Subcommittee on Economic and Security Implications as (8).

2021—Pars. (7), (8). Pub. L. 117–81 added pars. (7) and (8) and struck out former par. (7) which defined "Subcommittee".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 115–368, §1(a), Dec. 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 5092, provided that: "This Act [enacting this chapter] may be cited as the 'National Quantum Initiative Act'."

1 So in original. Two pars. (8) have been enacted.
### §631a. Congressional declaration of small business economic policy

#### (a) Foster small business

For the purpose of preserving and promoting a competitive free enterprise economic system, Congress hereby declares that it is the continuing policy and responsibility of the Federal Government to use all practical means and to take such actions as are necessary, consistent with its needs and obligations and other essential considerations of national policy, to implement and coordinate all Federal department, agency, and instrumentality policies, programs, and activities in order to: foster the economic interests of small businesses; insure a competitive economic climate conducive to the development, growth and expansion of small businesses; establish incentives to assure that adequate capital and other resources at competitive prices are available to small businesses; reduce the concentration of economic resources and expand competition; and provide an opportunity for entrepreneurship, inventiveness, and the creation and growth of small businesses.

#### (b) Capital availability to small business

Congress further declares that the Federal Government is committed to a policy of utilizing all reasonable means, consistent with the overall economic policy goals of the Nation and the preservation of the competitive free enterprise system of the Nation, to establish private sector incentives that will help assure that adequate capital at competitive prices is available to small businesses. To fulfill this policy, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities of the Federal Government shall use all reasonable means to coordinate, create, and sustain policies and programs which promote investment in small businesses, including those investments which expand employment opportunities and which foster the effective and efficient use of human and natural resources in the economy of the Nation.

(Pub. L. 96–302, title III, §302, July 2, 1980, 94 Stat. 848.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Small Business Economic Policy Act of 1980, and not as part of the Small Business Act which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1980, see section 507 of Pub. L. 96–302, set out as an Effective Date of 1980 Amendment note under section 631 of this title.

#### Short Title

For short title of title III of Pub. L. 96–302, as the Small Business Economic Policy Act of 1980, see Short Title of 1980 Amendments note set out under section 631 of this title.
§ 202.111 Rule 11: Hearing, oral or written. ( a ) *When held.* A hearing, oral or written, shall be held unless: ( 1 ) Each respondent admits or is deemed to admit sufficient allegations of the complaint to support the full amount claimed by the complainant as reparation;
( 2 ) Each respondent admits liability to the complainant in the full amount claimed by the complainant as reparation;
( 3 ) Before a hearing has been completed the parties agree in writing that the proceeding may be decided on the basis of the record as it stands at the time such agreement is filed; or
( 4 ) Before a hearing has been completed the parties settle their dispute or the complainant withdraws the complaint.
( b ) *Whether oral or written.* The hearing provided for in paragraph (a) of this section shall be oral if: ( 1 ) $10,000 or more is in controversy and any respondent files a written request for an oral hearing with such respondent's answer; or
( 2 ) $10,000 or more is in controversy and any complainant files a written request for an oral hearing on or before the 20th day after service on such complainant of notice that no respondent has filed a timely request for an oral hearing; or
( 3 ) Less than $10,000 is in controversy and the presiding officer determines, upon written request by any party thereto, that an oral hearing is necessary to establish the facts and circumstances giving rise to the controversy. The hearing shall be written if not oral.
( c ) *Withdrawal of request.* If $10,000 or more is in controversy and a party has timely filed a request for oral hearing, such party may withdraw such request at any time prior to completion of an oral hearing. If such a withdrawal leaves no pending request for oral hearing in the proceeding, and if the presiding officer has not decided that the hearing should be oral, each other party shall be served with notice of this and shall be given 20 days to request an oral hearing. If any party files a request for oral hearing in such time, the hearing shall be oral in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section.
( d ) *Presiding Officer's recommendation.* The presiding officer may recommend voluntary withdrawal of a request for oral hearing, timely filed. Declining to make such withdrawal shall not affect the rights or interests of any party.
( e ) *Representation.* Any party may appear in an oral hearing, or file evidence in a written hearing, in person or by counsel or other representative. For unethical or contumacious conduct in or in connection with a proceeding, the presiding officer may preclude a person from further acting as attorney or representative for any party to the proceeding; any such order of the presiding officer shall be served on the parties; an appeal to the Judicial Officer may be taken from any such order immediately.
[51 FR 42083, Nov. 21, 1986, as amended at 55 FR 41184, Oct. 10, 1990]
#### § 385.910 Conduct of the hearing (Rule 910).

The presiding officer is responsible for conduct of the hearing, including the order of procedure.
Editorial Note on Part 284
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 284 appear at 65 FR 10222, Feb. 25, 2000.

§ 284.403 Code of conduct for persons holding blanket marketing certificates. ( a ) To the extent Seller engages in reporting of transactions to publishers of electricity or natural gas indices, Seller must provide accurate and factual information, and not knowingly submit false or misleading information or omit material information to any such publisher, by reporting its transactions in a manner consistent with the procedures set forth in the *Policy Statement on Natural Gas and Electric Price Indices*, issued by the Commission in Docket No. PL03-3-000 and any clarifications thereto. Seller must notify the Commission as part of its FERC Form No. 552 annual reporting requirement in § 260.401 of this chapter whether it reports its transactions to publishers of electricity and natural gas indices. In addition, Seller shall adhere to any other standards and requirements for price reporting as the Commission may order.
( b ) A blanket marketing certificate holder shall retain, for a period of five years, all data and information upon which it billed the prices it charged for the natural gas sold pursuant to its market based sales certificate or the prices it reported for use in price indices.
[Order 644, 68 FR 66337, Nov. 26, 2003, as amended by Order 673, 71 FR 9716, Feb. 27, 2006; Order 677, 71 FR 30287, May 26, 2006; 73 FR 1032, Jan. 4, 2008; 73 FR 55739, Sept. 26, 2008]
#### § 78.4 [Reserved]