alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 381.110 Fees for substantial amendments.

Fees established under this part for any filing will also be charged, as appropriate, for any substantial amendment to a pending filing. An amendment is considered substantial if it changes the character, nature, or the magnitude of the proposed activity or rate in the pending filing. For purposes of this section, an application for a temporary certificate is not considered to be an amendment to a pending certificate application.

[Order 433-A, 51 FR 43607, Dec. 3, 1986]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk October 22, 2012

h1015 

# Order

October 22, 2012

144433(18)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 144433

COA: 304007

Oakland CC: 2003

- 188576

- FH

KEVIN MAURICE STARKS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s July 24, 2012

order is considered , and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was

entered erroneously.
81° 00’ 00"

32°00'00"

30° 00'00"
24° 30’00

DRAWING NUMBER

1:100, 00d

DRAWING Ni

BT
StA ugustine,FL

|

81° 00°00”

at form

Rock

SYMBOLOGY
P|

Low Water
==== Channel
+ Light

*
.

Ve=

ee

(st AUGUSTINE, FL.

BATHYMETRIC CONTOUR INTERVAL 2 METERS ~
WITH SUPPLEMENTARY | METER CONTOURS
DATUM IS MEAN LOW WATER

DEPTH
Feet
0

GRADIENTS

eters
ts

Maximum Depth

. aN ro

‘ “

| sisbox
| JORTHOD
MT UNO

82°00’ 00"

&
yay
### §4052. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Commerce to carry out export promotion programs such sums as are necessary for fiscal years 1995 and 1996.

(Pub. L. 99–64, title II, §202, July 12, 1985, 99 Stat. 158; Pub. L. 99–633, §2, Nov. 7, 1986, 100 Stat. 3522; Pub. L. 100–418, title II, §2305(b)(1), Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1344; Pub. L. 102–429, title II, §208, Oct. 21, 1992, 106 Stat. 2205; Pub. L. 103–392, title III, §301, Oct. 22, 1994, 108 Stat. 4099.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Export Administration Amendments Act of 1985, and not as part of Pub. L. 97–290 which enacted this chapter.

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–392 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section read as follows: "There are authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Commerce—

"(1) to carry out export promotion programs—

"(A) $190,000,000 for fiscal year 1993; and

"(B) $200,000,000 for fiscal year 1994; and

"(2) to carry out section 4723 of this title, $5,500,000 for each of fiscal years 1993 and 1994."

1992—Pub. L. 102–429 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section read as follows: "There are authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Commerce to carry out export promotion programs $123,922,000 for the fiscal year 1988, and $146,400,000 for each of the fiscal years 1989 and 1990."

1988—Pub. L. 100–418 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section read as follows: "There is authorized to be appropriated $123,922,000 for each of the fiscal years 1987 and 1988 to the Department of Commerce to carry out export promotion programs."

1986—Pub. L. 99–633 substituted provisions authorizing appropriations of $123,922,000 for each of the fiscal years 1987 and 1988 for provisions authorizing appropriations of $113,273,000 for each of the fiscal years 1985 and 1986.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ALFRED RHINER
, Appellant,

v.

SECRETARY OF THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

L

AWNWOOD R EGIONAL M EDICAL C ENTER AND HEART INSTITUTE

, and TAKASHI K O YAMA, D

. M

. D

. , Appellee s

.

No. 4D 2023

- 0070

[ August 28, 2024 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St.

Lucie County ; Laurie E. Buchanan , Judge ; L.T. Case No.

562017CA000579

.

Alfred Rhiner, pro se, Avon Park.

Louis Reinstein of Kelley Kronenberg, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee Secretary of the Florida Department of Corrections.

No brief filed for appellee Lawnwood Regional Medical Center and Heart

Institute.

No appearance for appellee Takashi Koyama.

P ER C URIAM

.

A ppellee Lawnwood Regional Medical Center and Heart Institute’s June
29, 2024 motion to dismiss Appellant Alfred Rhiner’s appeal with respect to Rhiner’s complaint against Lawnwood is granted, and the above

- styled appeal is dismissed in part as moot due to an executed settlement

agreement. See St. Mary ’ s Hosp., Inc. v. Bass By & Through Bass , 592 So. 2d 779, 780 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Merkle v. Guardianship of Jacoby , 912 So. 2d 595, 601 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005).

We affirm without discussion with respect to appellate challenges to disposition s favoring the other defendants.2 Affirmed in part, dismissed in part.

G ROSS

, F ORST and A RTAU

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# C_2012235EN.01000301.xml

| 4.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/3

---

Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 March 2012 — Longevity Health Products Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(Case C-81/11 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 8(1)(b) - Application for Community word mark RESVEROL - Opposition by the proprietor of the earlier international word mark LESTEROL - Assessment of the likelihood of confusion - Rights of the defence)

2012/C 235/03

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Longevity Health Products Inc. (represented by: J. Korab, Rechtsanwalt)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 December 2010 in Case T-363/09 Longevity Health Products v OHIM — Gruppo Lepetit, by which that court dismissed an action brought by the applicant for word mark ‘RESVEROL’, for goods and services in Classes 3, 5 and 35, against decision R 1204/2008-2 of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 9 July 2009, dismissing the appeal lodged against the Opposition Division’s decision which refused in part registration of that mark in the context of the opposition brought by the proprietor of the national word marks ‘LESTEROL’, for goods in Class 5

Longevity Health Products

OHIM — Gruppo Lepetit

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Longevity Health Products Inc. shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Longevity Health Products Inc. shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 139, 7.5.2011.

1

---
### §7710. Improving enforcement by providing rewards for information about violations; labeling

The Commission shall transmit to the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and the House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce—

(1) a report, within 9 months after December 16, 2003, that sets forth a system for rewarding those who supply information about violations of this chapter, including—

(A) procedures for the Commission to grant a reward of not less than 20 percent of the total civil penalty collected for a violation of this chapter to the first person that—

(i) identifies the person in violation of this chapter; and

(ii) supplies information that leads to the successful collection of a civil penalty by the Commission; and

(B) procedures to minimize the burden of submitting a complaint to the Commission concerning violations of this chapter, including procedures to allow the electronic submission of complaints to the Commission; and

(2) a report, within 18 months after December 16, 2003, that sets forth a plan for requiring commercial electronic mail to be identifiable from its subject line, by means of compliance with Internet Engineering Task Force Standards, the use of the characters "ADV" in the subject line, or other comparable identifier, or an explanation of any concerns the Commission has that cause the Commission to recommend against the plan.

(Pub. L. 108–187, §11, Dec. 16, 2003, 117 Stat. 2717.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in par. (1), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 108–187, Dec. 16, 2003, 117 Stat. 2699, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 7701 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 2004, see section 16 of Pub. L. 108–187, set out as a note under section 7701 of this title.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is  hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and  552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential  trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals  associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of  personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of General Medical Sciences Special Emphasis Panel,  Research Centers in Trauma, Burn and Perioperative Injury.                    

*Date:*                         April 8, 2011.                    

*Time:*                         1 p.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, 45 Center Drive, Room 3AN12B,  Bethesda, MD 20892  (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Brian R. Pike, PhD,  Scientific Review Officer,  Office of Scientific Review,  National Institute of General Medical Sciences,  National Institutes of Health,  45 Center Drive, Room 3AN18,  Bethesda, MD 20892,  301-594-3907,                         *pikbr@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, Special Minority Initiatives, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: March 3, 2011.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2011-5513 Filed 3-9-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
### §6406. Compliance

The Council may bring suit in Federal court to compel compliance with an assessment levied by the Council under this chapter. A successful action for compliance under this section may also require payment by the defendant of the costs incurred by the Council in bringing such action.

(Pub. L. 104–284, §7, Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3374.)
# C_2012303EN.01000403.xml

| 6.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/4

---

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 May 2012 — Timehouse GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(Case C-453/11 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Three-dimensional mark representing a watch - Refusal of registration - Lack of distinctiveness)

2012/C 303/07

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Timehouse GmbH (represented by: V. Knies, Rechtsanwalt)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: K. Klüpfel, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal lodged against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 July 2011 in Case T-235/10 Timehouse v OHIM (Shape of a watch with scalloped edges), by which the General Court dismissed an action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 March 2010 (Case R 0492/2009-1) concerning an application for registration as a Community trade mark of a three-dimensional sign consisting of the shape of a watch — Lack of distinctiveness

Timehouse

OHIM (Shape of a watch with scalloped edges)

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Timehouse GmbH is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Timehouse GmbH is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 340, 19.11.2011.

1

---
§ 1317.125 Effect of other requirements. ( a ) *Effect of other Federal provisions.* The obligations imposed by these Title IX regulations are independent of, and do not alter, obligations not to discriminate on the basis of sex imposed by Executive Order 11246, 3 CFR, 1964-1965 Comp., p. 339; as amended by Executive Order 11375, 3 CFR, 1966-1970 Comp., p. 684; as amended by Executive Order 11478, 3 CFR, 1966-1970 Comp., p. 803; as amended by Executive Order 12087, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 230; as amended by Executive Order 12107, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 264; sections 704 and 855 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 295m, 298b-2); Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e *et seq.*); the Equal Pay Act of 1963 (29 U.S.C. 206); and any other Act of Congress or Federal regulation.
( b ) *Effect of State or local law or other requirements.* The obligation to comply with these Title IX regulations is not obviated or alleviated by any State or local law or other requirement that would render any applicant or student ineligible, or limit the eligibility of any applicant or student, on the basis of sex, to practice any occupation or profession.
( c ) *Effect of rules or regulations of private organizations.* The obligation to comply with these Title IX regulations is not obviated or alleviated by any rule or regulation of any organization, club, athletic or other league, or association that would render any applicant or student ineligible to participate or limit the eligibility or participation of any applicant or student, on the basis of sex, in any education program or activity operated by a recipient and that receives Federal financial assistance.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE PILOT
NETWORK SERVICES, INC. FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          31,221
<SECURITIES>                                    11,848
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,102
<ALLOWANCES>                                       284
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                45,291
<PP&E>                                          13,959
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,819
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  54,160
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,216
<BONDS>                                          4,549
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,381
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    54,160
<SALES>                                          7,490
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,490
<CGS>                                            8,604
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,604
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,369
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (1,239)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (8,722)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (8,722)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1.68)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.68)
        

</TABLE>
### §785. Foreign ownership; comprehensive review; sources of information; report to Congress; monitoring activity

The Administrator shall conduct a comprehensive review of foreign ownership of, influence on, and control of domestic energy sources and supplies. Such review shall draw upon existing information, where available, and any independent investigation necessary by the Administration. The Administrator shall, on or before the expiration of the one hundred and eighty day period following the effective date of this chapter, report to the Congress in sufficient detail so as to apprise the Congress as to the extent and forms of such foreign ownership of, influence on, and control of domestic energy sources and supplies, and shall thereafter continue to monitor such ownership, influence and control.

(Pub. L. 93–275, §26, May 7, 1974, 88 Stat. 115.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

Federal Energy Administration terminated and functions vested by law in Administrator thereof transferred to Secretary of Energy (unless otherwise specifically provided) by sections 7151(a) and 7293 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.
### SUBCHAPTER I—WELLHEAD PRICING
# C_2010260EN.01002501.xml

| 25.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/25

---

Action brought on 4 August 2010 — SA.PAR. v OHIM — Salini Costruttori (GRUPPO SALINI)

(Case T-321/10)

()

2010/C 260/34

Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: SA.PAR. Srl (Rome, Italy) (represented by: A. Masetti Zannini de Concina, M. Bussoletti and G. Petrocchi, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Salini Costruttori SpA (Rome, Italy)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | declare the present action admissible; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the present action admissible;

| — | annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 April 2010 on the grounds of breach of Articles 52(1)(b) and 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 and of a deficient statement of reasons; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 April 2010 on the grounds of breach of Articles 52(1)(b) and 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 and of a deficient statement of reasons;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs of the present proceedings and of those before the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs of the present proceedings and of those before the Board of Appeal.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: Word mark ‘GRUPPO SALINI’ (registration application No 3 832 161) for services in Classes 36, 37 and 42.

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The applicant.

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Party requesting the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: SALINI COSTRUTTORI SpA.

Party requesting the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark:

Trade mark right of the party requesting the declaration of invalidity: Well-known trade mark in Italy, de facto trade mark, domain name and company name of ‘SALINI’ for services in Classes 36, 37 and 42.

Trade mark right of the party requesting the declaration of invalidity:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Rejection of the application for a declaration of invalidity.

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulment of the decision of the Cancellation Division and declaration of nullity of the Community trade mark.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Breach of Article 53(1)(a), in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b) and 8(2)(c), of Regulation No 207/2009 on the Community trade mark, breach of Article 52(1)(b) of that regulation, and deficient statement of reasons.

Pleas in law:

---