alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013086EN.01000402.xml

| 23.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 86/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 86/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 31 January 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Komisia za zashtita ot diskriminatsia — Bulgaria) — Valeri Hariev Belov v CHEZ Elektro Balgaria AD and Others

(Case C-394/11) (1)

1

(Request for a preliminary ruling - Article 267 TFEU - Concept of ‘national court’ - Lack of jurisdiction of the Court)

2013/C 86/06

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Referring court

Komisia za zashtita ot diskriminatsia, Bulgaria

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Valeri Hariev Belov

Applicant:

Defendants: CHEZ Elektro Balgaria AD, Lidia Georgieva Dimitrova, Roselina Dimitrova Kostova, Kremena Stoyanova Stoyanova, CHEZ Razpredelenie Balgaria AD, Ivan Kovarzhchik, Atanas Antonov Dandarov, Irzhi Postolka,Vladimir Marek, Darzhavna Komisia po energi

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Komisia za zashtita ot diskriminatsia — Interpretation of Article 2(1)(a) and (b), Article 3(1)(h) and Article 8(1) of Council Directive 2000/43/EC of 29 June 2000 implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin (OJ 2000 L 180, p. 22), Article 38 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, recital 29 in the preamble to, and Articles 1 and 13(1) of, Directive 2006/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2006 on energy end-use efficiency and energy services and repealing Council Directive 93/76/EEC (OJ 2006 L 114, p. 64), Article 3(5) of Directive 2003/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2003 concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity and repealing Directive 96/92/EC — Statements made with regard to decommissioning and waste management activities (OJ 2003 L 176, p. 37), Article 3(7) of Directive 2009/72/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity and repealing Directive 2003/54/EC (OJ 2009 L 211, p. 55) — Administrative practice of granting an electricity distribution undertaking freedom to install in Roma districts electricity meters attached to electricity poles in the streets at a height which is not accessible to users, and which does not enable consumers living in those districts to read their meters, whereas electricity meters are installed at an accessible height outside of Roma districts — Right or interest of the final electricity user to regularly check the electricity meeting reading — Burden of proof in discrimination cases.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court of Justice of the European Union does not have jurisdiction to answer the questions referred by the Komisia za zashtita ot diskriminatsia in its order for reference of 19 July 2011.

---

(1)  OJ C 298, 8.10.2011.

1

---
AD Grid Sheet 

o~SG:> Docket No.: FAA-2014-**** 

Directorate Identifier: 2013-NM-214-AD 

AD Action: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 

This action applies to The Boeing Company Model 777-200LR, -300, -300ER, and 

777F series airplanes. 

CONCURRENCES 

OUTING SYMBOL 

SIGNATURE (First Initial/Last Name) 

c.~ 

OUTING SYMBOL 

ANM-114 

If this draft is acceptable, please legibly sign the grid to the right with your first initial ~:;_:_".L!.~~::::_ __ 

and full last name to show concurrence with this AD. 

SIGNATURE (First Initiai!Last Name) 

DATE 

ROUTING SYMBOL 

SIGNATURE (First lnitiai!Last Name) 

ATE 

ROUTING SYMBOL 

SIGNATURE (First Initial/Last Name) 

ATE 

OUTING SYMBOL 

SIGNATURE (First Initial/Last Name) 

ATE 
AD Grid Sheet 

O:l-Gfc. 

DocketNo.: FAA-2014-  

Directorate Identifier: 2013-NM-214-AD 

AD Action: Notice of proposed rulemak.ing (NPRM) 

This action applies to The Boeing Company Mode] 777-200LR, -300, -300ER, and 

777F series airplanes. 

If this draft is acceptable, please legibly sign the grid to the right with your first initial t--~:L--r----­

and full last name to show concurrence with this AD. 

IGNATURE (Firslln iliai/Lasl Name) 

IGNATURE (Firsllniciai/Lasl Name) 
AD Grid Sheet 

Q.25tp 

Docket No.: FAA-2014-** ** 

Directorate Identifier: 2013-NM-214-AD 

AD Action: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 

This action applies to The Boeing Company Model 777-200LR, -300, -300ER, and 

777F series airplanes. 

ONCURRENCES 

OUTING SYMBO ~ 

ANM-l30S 

ROUTING SYMBOL 

< ~N 3os _ 1 

SIGNfiff !);F rs~ I ~if~ Las . ~t-c) 

IV t//JY.·(J.!4/ , ·1 

If this draft is acceptable, please legibly sign the grid to the right with your first initial J....,..,.~.::..___,,...._ __ _ 

and full last name to show concurrence with this AD. 

ROUTING SYMBOL 

SIGNATURE (First lniti:olilA1sl Name) 

DATE 

ROUTING SYMBOL 

SIGNATURE (First lnitinl1L1St Name) 

DATE 

OUTING SYMBOL 

IGNATURE (first lnitiaiiL1st Name) 

DATE
§ 401.105 Indexes of certain records. ( a ) Indexes shall be maintained, and revised at least quarterly, for the following Commission records: ( 1 ) Final opinions and orders made in the adjudication of cases.
( 2 ) Statements of policy and interpretation adopted by the Commission and still in force and not published in the Federal Register or official minutes of Commission meetings.
( 3 ) Administrative staff manuals and instructions to staff that affect members of the public.
( b ) A copy of each such index is available at cost of duplication from the Records Access Officer.
[40 FR 14056, Mar. 28, 1975; 40 FR 17987, Apr. 24, 1975. Redesignated at 52 FR 37602, Oct. 8, 1987, as amended at 89 FR 51827, June 20, 2024]
# C_2011219EN.01000801.xml

| 23.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 219/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 219/8

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší Správní Soud (Czech Republic) lodged on 11 May 2011 — Star Coaches s.r.o. v Finanční ředitelství pro hlavní město Prahu

(Case C-220/11)

2011/C 219/10

Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Referring court

Nejvyšší Správní Soud

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Star Coaches, s.r.o.

Applicant:

Defendant: Finanční ředitelství pro hlavní město Prahu

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Does Article 306 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (1) refer only to supplies made by travel agents to end users of a travel service (travellers) or also to supplies made to other persons (customers)? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does Article 306 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (1) refer only to supplies made by travel agents to end users of a travel service (travellers) or also to supplies made to other persons (customers)?

1

| 2. | Should a transport company which merely provides transport of persons by providing bus transport to travel agencies (not directly to travellers) and which does not provide any other services (accommodation, information, consultancy etc.) be regarded as a travel agent for the purposes of Article 306 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Should a transport company which merely provides transport of persons by providing bus transport to travel agencies (not directly to travellers) and which does not provide any other services (accommodation, information, consultancy etc.) be regarded as a travel agent for the purposes of Article 306 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax?

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.

1

---
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 75 

To prohibit certain business concerns from receiving assistance from the 

Small Business Administration, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 10, 2019 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself and Ms. ERNST) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship 

A BILL 

To prohibit certain business concerns from receiving assistance from the Small Business Administration, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Preventing SBA As5 sistance from Going to China Act of 2019’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 75 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON AFFILIATION WITH THE PEOPLE’S 

2 REPUBLIC OF CHINA. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3(a) of the Small Busi4 ness Act (15 U.S.C. 632(a)) is amended by adding at the 

5 end the following: 

6 ‘‘(10) PROHIBITION ON AFFILIATION WITH THE

7 PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA.—For purposes of 

8 this Act, a small business concern may not— 

9 ‘‘(A) be headquarted in the People’s Re10 public of China; or 

11 ‘‘(B) have more than 25 percent of the vot12 ing stock of the small business concern owned 

13 by affiliates that are citizens of the People’s Re14 public of China.’’. 

15 (b) REGULATIONS AND GUIDANCE.—The Adminis16 trator of the Small Business Administration shall amend 

17 the regulations and guidance of the Administration, in18 cluding sections 120.100, 120.110, and 121.105 of title 

19 13, Code of Federal Regulations, to carry out the amend20 ment made by this Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
### §717v. Separability

If any provision of this chapter, or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance, shall be held invalid, the remainder of the chapter, and the application of such provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid, shall not be affected thereby.

(June 21, 1938, ch. 556, §25, formerly §23, 52 Stat. 833; renumbered §25, Pub. L. 109–58, title III, §314(b)(1)(A), Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 690.)
### §720h. Clarification of ANGTA status and authorities

#### (a) Savings clause

Nothing in this chapter affects—

(1) any decision, certificate, permit, right-of-way, lease, or other authorization issued under section 9 of the Alaska Natural Gas Transportation Act of 1976 (15 U.S.C. 719g); or

(2) any Presidential finding or waiver issued in accordance with that Act [15 U.S.C. 719 et seq.].

#### (b) Clarification of authority to amend terms and conditions to meet current project requirements

Any Federal agency responsible for granting or issuing any certificate, permit, right-of-way, lease, or other authorization under section 9 of the Alaska Natural Gas Transportation Act of 1976 (15 U.S.C. 719g) may add to, amend, or rescind any term or condition included in the certificate, permit, right-of-way, lease, or other authorization to meet current project requirements (including the physical design, facilities, and tariff specifications), if the addition, amendment, or rescission—

(1) would not compel any change in the basic nature and general route of the Alaska natural gas transportation system as designated and described in section 2 of the President's decision; or

(2) would not otherwise prevent or impair in any significant respect the expeditious construction and initial operation of the Alaska natural gas transportation system.

#### (c) Updated environmental reviews

The Secretary shall require the sponsor of the Alaska natural gas transportation system to submit such updated environmental data, reports, permits, and impact analyses as the Secretary determines are necessary to develop detailed terms, conditions, and compliance plans required by section 5 of the President's decision.

(Pub. L. 108–324, div. C, §110, Oct. 13, 2004, 118 Stat. 1262.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (a), was in the original "this division", meaning division C of Pub. L. 108–324, Oct. 13, 2004, 118 Stat. 1255, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of division C to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 720 of this title and Tables.

The Alaska Natural Gas Transportation Act of 1976, referred to in subsec. (a)(2), is Pub. L. 94–586, Oct. 22, 1976, 90 Stat. 2903, which is classified generally to chapter 15C (§719 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 719 of this title and Tables.
§ 1318.503 Programmatic and generic NEPA documents. ( a ) A programmatic or generic EA or EIS may be prepared to address a proposed program, policy, or plan, or a proposed action that has a wide geographic scope.
( b ) A programmatic EA or EIS can support high-level or broad decisionmaking, and can provide the foundation for the efficient review of specific tiered implementing actions.
( c ) Ongoing or previously planned and approved actions that are within the scope of a programmatic review may continue during the programmatic review period, so long as the criteria at 40 CFR 1506.1(c) are met.
( d ) The identification of significant impacts in a programmatic EIS does not preclude the review of specific implementing actions in an EA that tiers from the programmatic EIS if the implementing actions would not result in new or different significant impacts.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

KENNETH PIERCE and CAROLE PIERCE,

Appellants,

v.

THE REEF HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION, INC.,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-3477

[December 19, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, 

Martin County; William L. Roby, Judge; L.T. Case No. 4318000691CA.

David R. Roy of David R. Roy P.A., Pompano Beach, for appellants.

Robert S. Gershman of Gershman & Gershman, P.A., Delray Beach, 

for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, GERBER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 651 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 651

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the age 
  requirement with respect to eligibility for qualified ABLE programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 5, 2019

  Mr. Casey (for himself, Mr. Moran, Mr. Van Hollen, and Mr. Roberts) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the age 
  requirement with respect to eligibility for qualified ABLE programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``ABLE Age Adjustment Act''.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF AGE REQUIREMENT FOR QUALIFIED ABLE PROGRAMS.

    (a) In General.--Section 529A(e) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by striking ``age 26'' each place it appears in 
paragraphs (1)(A) and (2)(A)(i)(II) and inserting ``age 46''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 23, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-30321 Summary Calendar

IRIS HURST DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

LARRY AYRES, GERALDINE BATTLEY, JAMES BOULANGER, NICK CICERO, DONALD DOUCET, DON EWING, CARL MCLEMORE, MAURICE PICARD, MIX VOSBURG, JULIET WILLIAMS, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana, Baton Rouge

3:04-CV-431-JVP

-------------------- Before KING, WIENER, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Plaintiff Iris Hurst Davis brought suit in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana against Larry Ayers and nine other individuals acting in their individual and official capacities as administrators of Pointe Coupee General Hospital (“PCGH”) and against the Board of Directors of PCGH, alleging that under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Plaintiff was deprived of “liberty and property” without due process of law in violation ofthe Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States

Constitution and in violation of the Constitution of the State of Louisiana when such defendants, individually and collectively, terminated Plaintiff’s employment with PCGH. Defendants moved to dismiss the suit under FRCP 12(b)(6) and the district court granted such motion to dismiss. Plaintiff appeals to this Court. We have carefully reviewed the briefs, the record excerpts, and relevant portions of the record itself. For the reasons stated by the district court in its memorandum ruling of November 15, 2004, we affirm the final judgment entered by that court on February 11, 2005.
AFFIRMED.
PUBLIC LAW 113–206—DEC. 16, 2014 128 STAT. 2073 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 451: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 160 (2014): 

July 14, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 3, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 113–206 

113th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 500 North 

Brevard Avenue in Cocoa Beach, Florida, as the ‘‘Richard K. Salick Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. RICHARD K. SALICK POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 500 North Brevard Avenue in Cocoa Beach, 

Florida, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Richard K. Salick 

Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Richard K. Salick Post Office’’. 

Approved December 16, 2014. 

Dec. 16, 2014 

[H.R. 451] 


srobinson on DSKB307YQ1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
§ 430.15 Conservation requirements. The following conservation requirements shall apply to all existing, new or expanded ground water withdrawals for municipal, public, industrial or commercial water supply whose cumulative daily average withdrawal from one or more wells during any calendar month exceeds 10,000 gallons. ( a ) Each person, firm, corporation or other entity withdrawing ground water within the Southeastern Pennsylvania Ground Water Protected Area for purposes of municipal or public water supply shall comply with the following conservation requirements: ( 1 ) Water connections shall be metered, and water charges collected shall be based on metered usage.
( 2 ) A water conservation program shall be initiated and diligently pursued within the service area of the municipal or public water supply. Such program shall include a program for leakage control providing for the monitoring, prevention and repair of significant leakage, and the provision of customer information relating to water-saving devices.
( 3 ) Interconnections with adjacent water systems shall be considered to assure more reliable supplies of water during emergencies.
( 4 ) A drought emergency plan specifying actions which would be taken to reduce demand and assure supplies to priority uses in the event of drought conditions shall be prepared in cooperation with the municipalities in the service area. The plan shall be filed with the Commission.
( b ) Each person, firm, corporation or other entity withdrawing ground water within the Southeastern Pennsylvania Ground Water Protected Area for purposes of industrial or commercial water supply shall comply with the following conservation requirements: ( 1 ) Opportunities for water conservation shall be investigated and all feasible conservation measures shall be implemented at the earliest practicable time.
( 2 ) Water uses shall be monitored, and a systematic process shall be adopted and implemented to provide for the detection and expeditious correction of leakage.
( 3 ) A drought emergency plan specifying the actions to be taken to reduce demand in the event of drought conditions shall be prepared and filed with the Commission.
( c ) Permits issued pursuant to these regulations shall be conditioned upon compliance with the requirements of this section.
Exhibit 20.1


Chase Manhattan Grantor Trust 1995-A

From: The Chase Manhattan Bank

To:   Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.


                   MONTHLY CERTIFICATEHOLDER'S REPORT
                   ----------------------------------

Due Period 16 Beginning Date                     12/01/1996
Due Period 16 End Date                           12/31/1996
Determination Date                               01/10/1997
Remittance Date                                  01/15/1997


I.    Monthly Principal and Principal Carryover Shortfall to Certificateholders
      (Per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                  $ 24.5962589697

II.   Monthly In2erest and Unpaid Interest to Certificateholders
      (Per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                   $ 2.6353827468

III.  Monthly Expenses Summary

      A. Servicing Fee Disbursement                                $ 658,994.87
      B. Cash Collateral Account Expense                                 $ 0.00
      C. Total Expenses paid
         (per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                $ 0.4392304545

IV.   Cash Collateral Account Deposit Amount                             $ 0.00

V.    Outstanding Advance Summary

      A. From Prior Period                                       $ 3,961,387.82
      B. From Current Period                                     $ 4,229,149.93
      C. Change in Amount Between Periods (Lines B - A)            $ 267,762.11

VI.   Pool Factor Information

      A. Certificate Principal Balance                         $ 753,891,107.02
      B. Initial Certificate Balance                         $ 1,500,339,658.38
      C. Pool Factor (Lines A / B)                               0.502480290252

VII.  Available Cash Collateral Account Information for Due Period

      A. Available Cash Collateral Amount                       $ 39,539,692.49
      B. Available Cash Collateral Amount Percentage            5.000000000000%

VIII. Required Cash Collateral Amount

      A. For the Current Collection Period                      $ 39,539,692.49
      B. For the Next Collection Period                         $ 37,694,555.35
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Albert Aimers, the Chief Executive Officer of iLive, Inc. (the "Company"),
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)      the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal
         quarter ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



Dated: December 6, 2002



                                                /s/ Albert Aimers
                                                -----------------
                                                Name: Albert Aimers
                                                Title: Chief Executive Officer