alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-  Business Guide 
-  Launch Your Business 
-  Get Business Insurance 

## Section navigation

-  10 steps to start your business 
-  Plan your business 
-  Launch your business    -  Pick your business location 
  -  Choose a business structure 
  -  Choose your business name 
  -  Register your business 
  -  Get federal and state tax ID numbers 
  -  Apply for licenses and permits 
  -  Open a business bank account 
  -  Get business insurance 
-  Manage your business 
-  Grow your business 

# Get business insurance

----

## Content

----

## Pick the type of business insurance you need

You get some protections from the kind of business structure you choose.  A limited liability company (LLC) or a corporation status can protect your personal property from lawsuits. However, that protection has limits.

Unexpected catastrophe? Business insurance can fill in any gaps in coverage. This will make sure both your personal and business assets are fully protected..

You also may be legally required to purchase certain types of business insurance.

The federal government requires every business with employees to have the following:
                  - Workers’ compensation 
                  - Unemployment
                  - Disability insurance

Some states also require additional insurance. Laws requiring insurance vary by state. Visit your state’s website** **to find out the requirements for your business.  

## Six common types of business insurance

After you purchase insurance that's required by law, you can find insurance to cover any other business risk. As a general rule, you should insure against things you wouldn’t be able to pay for on your own.

Speak to insurance agents to find out what kinds of coverage makes sense for your business. Then compare terms and prices to find the best deal for you. Here are six common kinds of business insurance to look for:

## Four steps to buy business insurance

                  - **Assess your risks**.** **Think about what kind of accidents, natural disasters, or lawsuits could damage your business. Is your business located in a commercial area that is at risk from seasonal events? Commercial property insurance will help protect against loss.
                  - **Find a reputable licensed agent**.** **Commercial insurance agents can help you find policies that match your business needs. They receive commissions from insurance companies when they sell policies, so it's important to find a licensed agent that’s interested in your needs as much as his or her own.
                  - **Shop around**.** **Prices and benefits can vary significantly. You should compare rates, terms, and benefits for insurance offers from several different agents.
                  - **Re-assess every year**. As your business grows, so do your liabilities. If you have purchased or replaced equipment or expanded operations, contact your insurance agent. You should discuss any changes in your business and how they affect your coverage.

### Need help? Get free business counseling

Find counselors
Exhibit 4.7


 


 


 





March 11, 2016


 


Securities and Exchange Commission


100 F Street, NE


Washington, D.C. 20549


 


Re: SB Financial Group, Inc. — Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


SB Financial Group, Inc., an Ohio corporation ("SB Financial"),
is today filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") the Annual Report on Form 10-K of SB Financial
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 ("SB Financial’s 2015 Form 10-K").


 


Pursuant to the instructions relating to the Exhibits in Item 601(b)(4)(iii)
of Regulation S-K, SB Financial hereby agrees to furnish to the SEC, upon request, copies of instruments and agreements defining
the rights of holders of long-term debt and of the long-term debt of its consolidated subsidiaries, which are not being filed as
exhibits to SB Financial’s 2015 Form 10-K. None of such long-term debt exceeds 10% of the total assets of SB Financial and
its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.


 


Very truly yours,


 


SB FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.


 


/s/ Anthony V. Cosentino


 


Anthony V. Cosentino


Executive Vice President and


Chief Financial Officer


 


		401 Clinton Street | Defiance, OH 43512




		P 419.783.8950 | F 419.782.6393




		YourSBFinancial.com
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 819 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 819

  To modernize the reporting requirement under the Telephone Consumer 
                        Protection Act of 1991.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 14, 2019

 Mr. Moran (for himself and Mr. Schatz) introduced the following bill; 
    which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To modernize the reporting requirement under the Telephone Consumer 
                        Protection Act of 1991.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Communications Commission 
Reporting Modernization Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. TCPA ENFORCEMENT REPORT.

    Section 227(h) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 227(h)) 
is amended to read as follows:
    ``(h) TCPA Enforcement Report.--The Commission shall submit an 
annual report to Congress regarding the enforcement during the 
preceding year of laws, regulations, and policies relating to robocalls 
and spoofed calls, which report shall include--
            ``(1) the number of complaints received by the Commission 
        during the year alleging that a consumer received a robocall or 
        spoofed call;
            ``(2) the number of citations issued by the Commission 
        pursuant to section 503 during the year to enforce any law, 
        regulation, or policy relating to a robocall or spoofed call;
            ``(3) the number of notices of apparent liability issued by 
        the Commission pursuant to section 503 during the year to 
        enforce any law, regulation, or policy relating to a robocall 
        or spoofed call; and
            ``(4) for each notice referred to in paragraph (3)--
                    ``(A) the amount of the proposed forfeiture penalty 
                involved;
                    ``(B) the person to whom the notice was issued; and
                    ``(C) the status of the proceeding.''.
                                 <all>
```
Federal Fire Occurrence Map Viewer

Zoom In Zoom Out Full Extent Prev Extent Next Extent Pan Identify Extract Data

Latitude: 50.7571, Longitude: -98.6388 Scale: 1 : 18,4

Start Date:

GACC:

Northern Rockies

State:

California

Size Class:

E: 300.0 - 999.9 acres

Fire Type: (BIA,BLM,NPS,BOR)

False alarm

Protection Type: (BIA,BLM,NPS,BOR)

Fire use

1980-01-01

2014-12-31

Fire History http://wildfire.cr.usgs.gov/firehistory/viewer/viewer.htm

1 of 1 9/16/2015 10:00 AM
Editorial Note on Part 0
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 0 appear at 73 FR 73 FR 54947, Sept. 24, 2008.

§ 0.112 Special deputation. The Director, United States Marshals Service, is authorized to deputize the following persons to perform the functions of a Deputy U.S. Marshal in any district designated by the Director: ( a ) Selected officers or employees of the Department of Justice;
( b ) Selected federal, state, or local law enforcement officers whenever the law enforcement needs of the U.S. Marshals Service so require;
( c ) Selected employees of private security companies in providing courtroom security for the Federal judiciary;
( d ) Other persons designated by the Associate Attorney General pursuant to 28 CFR 0.19(a)(3).
All such deputations shall expire on a date certain which shall be stated on the face of the deputation. [Order No. 1047-84, 49 FR 6485, Feb. 22, 1984, as amended at 61 FR 33657, June 28, 1996]
AMENDMENT NUMBER FOUR
                                     TO THE
                            CANANDAIGUA BRANDS, INC.
                         LONG-TERM STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN


This Amendment  Number Four to the  Canandaigua  Brands,  Inc.  Long-Term  Stock
Incentive Plan (the "Plan") is adopted pursuant to Section 19 of the Plan by the
Board of Directors of  Constellation  Brands,  Inc. (f/k/a  Canandaigua  Brands,
Inc.) (the  "Company"),  acting in its capacity as the Committee under the Plan.
Capitalized  terms used herein which are not  otherwise  defined  shall have the
meanings ascribed to them in the Plan and Annex A thereto.

     1.   NAME. The name of the Plan is hereby changed to "Constellation Brands,
          Inc.  Long-Term  Stock  Incentive  Plan,"  and all  references  to the
          Company  name  in the  Plan  are  hereby  replaced  by  references  to
          "Constellation Brands, Inc."

In witness whereof,  Constellation Brands, Inc. has caused this instrument to be
executed as of December 21, 2000.

                                                  CONSTELLATION BRANDS, INC.


                                                  By: /s/ Richard Sands
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Richard Sands, President
Searched for **http://heritageabroad.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://heritageabroad.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
From: Dydasco, Darlene A [mailto:darlene.a.dydasco@boeing.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2014 12:47 AM

To: Konrad Dymowski

Cc: l.mordecki@enterair.pl

Subject: RE: ENT, PO14-221 ; PN: 65C38399-13

Dear Konrad,

I’m afraid the commit date is 19Jan15. The reason for the delay is the shortage of 

part number 415-1767-1 light plate where we are unable to obtain an improved 

schedule for the supplier. 

I apologize for the delay. Please let me know if you have any questions. 

Thank you, 

Darlene Dydasco 

Puget Sound Kitting / Retrofit - Service Bulletins

737 Classic Service Bulletins & Modification Programs 

Spares/Material Management, CAS

Office Phone: 206-662-2291
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 826 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 826

  To require the Secretary of Transportation to modify the final rule 
relating to flightcrew member duty and rest requirements for passenger 
  operations of air carriers to apply to all-cargo operations of air 
                   carriers, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 14, 2019

 Ms. Klobuchar (for herself, Ms. Cantwell, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. Markey, 
and Ms. Duckworth) introduced the following bill; which was read twice 
 and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the Secretary of Transportation to modify the final rule 
relating to flightcrew member duty and rest requirements for passenger 
  operations of air carriers to apply to all-cargo operations of air 
                   carriers, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Safe Skies Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF FINAL RULE RELATING TO FLIGHTCREW MEMBER DUTY 
              AND REST REQUIREMENTS FOR PASSENGER OPERATIONS TO APPLY 
              TO ALL-CARGO OPERATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 30 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall modify the 
final rule specified in subsection (b) so that the flightcrew member 
duty and rest requirements under that rule apply to flightcrew members 
in all-cargo operations conducted by air carriers in the same manner as 
those requirements apply to flightcrew members in passenger operations 
conducted by air carriers.
    (b) Final Rule Specified.--The final rule specified in this 
subsection is the final rule of the Federal Aviation Administration--
            (1) published in the Federal Register on January 4, 2012 
        (77 Fed. Reg. 330); and
            (2) relating to flightcrew member duty and rest 
        requirements.
    (c) Applicability of Rulemaking Requirements.--The requirements of 
section 553 of title 5, United States Code, shall not apply to the 
modification required by subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

•>-! '"^ 'b y i 

TRAVEL GROUP, INC., D/B/A REPUBLIC AIR TRAVEL 

AND SCOT SPENCER 

AIRLIFT GROUP, INC. 

AND RICHARD BERNARD 

Unauthorized Air Transportation, Unfair and Deceptive 

Practices and Unfair Methods of Competition, and 

Violations of Public Charter Rules 

EXPRESS ONE INTERNATIONAL, INC. 

Unfair and Deceptive Practices and Unfair Methods of 

Competition, and Violations of Public Charter Rules 

Enforcement Proceeding 

DOT-OST-1995-272 

formerly 

Docket 49233 

STATUS REPORT 

The Office of the Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and 

Proceedings ("Enforcement Office"), pursuant to Your Honor's March 22, 2006, Order 

staying this proceeding, files this report detailing the current status of this proceeding and 

settlement negotiations. 

The Department has not ruled on the outstanding motions filed by Respondents 

and opposed by the Enforcement Office in Ascend Aviation Group, Docket OST-2004-

17486. 
There have been no further settlement discussions. 

Date: May 27, 2011. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Samuel Podberesky 

Assistant General Counsel for 

Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings 

Dayton Lehman. Jr. 

Deputy Assistant General Counsel for 

Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings 

( > William J. wagner 

Senior Trial Att 

United States Department of Transportation 

Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Room 96-429 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

TEL; 202-366-9342 

FAX: 202-366-7152 
Docket No. DOT-OST-1995-272 

I hereby certify that on this 27th day of May, 2011, a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing Status Report was served in the following manner to the following: 

Original 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building Ground Floor 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

By Personal Service 

The Honorable Ronnie A Yoder 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

East Building Ground Floor 

Room El2-320 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

TEL: (202) 366-2142 

FAX: (202) 366-7536 

By First Class Mail 

Scot Spencer 

SBD Aircraft Services 

255 S Leland Norton Way 

Sam Bernardino, CA 92408
PUBLIC LAW 113–284—DEC. 18, 2014 128 STAT. 3089 

Public Law 113–284 

113th Congress 

An Act 

To repeal certain mandates of the Department of Homeland Security Office of 

Inspector General. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘DHS OIG Mandates Revision 

Act of 2014’’. 

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF REPORTING REQUIREMENTS. 

(a) REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT TO CONDUCT AN ANNUAL EVALUATION OF THE CARGO INSPECTION TARGETING SYSTEM.— 

(1) REPEAL.—Subsections (g) and (h) of section 809 of the 

Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation Act of 2004 (Public 

Law 108–293; 46 U.S.C. 70101 note) are repealed. 

(2) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 809 of the Coast 

Guard and Maritime Transportation Act of 2004 (Public Law 

108–293; 118 Stat. 1085), as amended by paragraph (1), is 

amended— 

(A) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘and (j)’’ and inserting 

‘‘and (h)’’; and 

(B) by redesignating subsections (i), (j), and (k) as 

subsections (g), (h), and (i), respectively. 

(b) REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT TO CONDUCT AN ANNUAL REVIEW

OF COAST GUARD PERFORMANCE.— 

(1) REPEAL.—Section 888(f) of the Homeland Security Act 

of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 468(f)) is repealed. 

(2) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 888 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 468), as amended by paragraph (1), is amended by redesignating subsections (g), (h), 

and (i) as subsections (f), (g), and (h), respectively. 

(c) ANNUAL REVIEW OF GRANTS TO STATES AND HIGH-RISK

URBAN AREAS.— 

(1) REPEAL.—Section 2022(a)(3) of the Homeland Security 

Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 612(a)(3)) is repealed. 

(2) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 2022(a) of the 

Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 612(a)), as amended 

by paragraph (1), is amended— 

(A) by redesignating paragraphs (4), (5), (6), and (7) 

as paragraphs (3), (4), (5), and (6), respectively; 

(B) in paragraph (4), as redesignated— 

(i) by striking ‘‘paragraphs (2) and (3)’’ and 

inserting ‘‘paragraph (2)’’; and 

46 USC 70101 

note. 

6 USC 101 note. 

DHS OIG 

Mandates 

Revision Act of 

2014. 

Dec. 18, 2014 

[S. 2651] 


srobinson on DSKB307YQ1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
128 STAT. 3090 PUBLIC LAW 113–284—DEC. 18, 2014 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 2651: 

SENATE REPORTS: No. 113–261 (Comm. on Homeland Security and Governmental 

Affairs). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 160 (2014): 

Sept. 17, considered and passed Senate. 

Dec. 10, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

(ii) by striking ‘‘paragraph (4)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraph (3)’’. 

(3) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this subsection shall take effect on January 1, 2015. 

Approved December 18, 2014. 

6 USC 612 note. 


srobinson on DSKB307YQ1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 6463** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. JONATHAN JORDAN , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh
. James C. Fox , Senior District Judge. ( 5:09

- cr - 00104

- F

- 2; 5:12

- cv - 00092

- F )

Submitted : July 2 1 , 2015 Decided: July 24, 2015

Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges , and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Jonathan Jordan, Appellant Pro Se. Eric David Goulian, Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Edward D. Gray, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpub lished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Jonathan Jordan seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magist rate judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not
ap pealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.
§ 225 3(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently review ed the record and conclude that Jordan has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealabili ty and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are3 adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 401.98 Settlement by agreement in lieu of penalty.

A possible violator may request settlement of a penalty proceeding by agreement. If the Executive Director determines that settlement by agreement in lieu of a penalty is in the best interest of the Commission, he may submit to the Commission a proposed settlement agreement in lieu of a penalty. No settlement will be considered by the Commission unless the possible violator has indicated to the Commission acceptance of the terms of the agreement and the intention to comply with all requirements of the settlement agreement including payment of any settlement amount within the time period provided. If the Commission determines not to approve a settlement agreement, the Commission may proceed with a penalty action in accordance with this subpart.
#### § 701.2 Creation and basic authority.

The Water Resources Council was established by the Water Resources Planning Act of 1965 (Pub. L. 89-80, 79 Stat. 244, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1962-1962d-5)). The rules and regulations of this part are promulgated by authority of section 402 of the Act (42 U.S.C. 1962d-1).

[41 FR 20548, May 19, 1976]
Editorial Note on Part 284
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 284 appear at 65 FR 10222, Feb. 25, 2000.

§ 284.504 Standard requirements for market-power authorizations. ( a ) Applicants granted the authority to charge market-based rates under § 284.503 that provide cost-based service(s) must separately account for all costs and revenues associated with facilities used to provide the market-based services. When it files to change its cost-based rates, applicant must provide a summary of the costs and revenues associated with market-based rates with applicable cross references to §§ 154.312 and 154.313 of this chapter. The summary statement must provide the formulae and explain the bases used in the allocation of common costs between the applicant's cost-based services and its market-based services.
( b ) A storage service provider granted the authority to charge market-based rates under § 284.503 is required to notify the Commission within 10 days of acquiring knowledge of significant changes occurring in its market power status. Such notification should include a detailed description of the new facilities/services and their relationship to the storage service provider. Significant changes include, but are not limited to: ( 1 ) The storage provider expanding its storage capacity beyond the amount authorized in this proceeding;
( 2 ) The storage provider acquiring transportation facilities or additional storage capacity;
( 3 ) An affiliate providing storage or transportation services in the same market area; and
( 4 ) The storage provider or an affiliate acquiring an interest in or is acquired by an interstate pipeline.