MODIFY and AFFIRM; and Opinion filed February 26, 2014.

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00877-CR

LASHANDA WILLIAMS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F10-59807-M

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Bridges, O’Neill, and Brown

Opinion by Justice O’Neill

LaShanda Williams appeals from the adjudication of her guilt for possession of cocaine 

in an amount less than one gram. See TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.115(a), (b) 

(Wet 2010). The trial court assessed punishment at two years’ confinement in state jail, probated 

for five years. In three issues, appellant contends the judgment should be modified to correct 

several errors. We modify the judgment adjudicating guilt and affirm as modified.

Appellant contends the judgment adjudicating guilt should be modified to show there was 

no plea agreement, the trial court found the allegations in the amended motion to adjudicate true, 

and the trial court suspended the sentence and placed appellant on regular community 

supervision. The State responds that the judgment should be modified in the ways appellant has 

requested.
-2-

The record shows the case proceeded on the State’s amended motion to adjudicate guilt 

and appellant entered an open plea of true to the allegations in the amended motion. The trial 

court adjudicated appellant guilty, and assessed punishment at two years’ imprisonment, 

probated for five years. The judgment adjudicating guilt incorrectly recites terms of a plea 

bargain. The judgment also incorrectly states that appellant violated the terms and conditions of 

community supervision as set out in the original motion to adjudicate. Moreover, the judgment 

incorrect states the trial court ordered the sentence to be executed. We sustain appellant’s three 

issues.

We modify the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt to show (1) appellant entered an 

open plea of true; (2) appellant violated the terms and conditions as set out in the State’s 

amended motion to adjudicate; and (3) the sentence was suspended and appellant placed on five 

years’ community supervision. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(b); Bigley v. State, 865 S.W.2d 26, 27–

28 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993); Asberry v. State, 813 S.W.2d 526, 529–30 (Tex. App.─Dallas 1991, 

pet. ref’d). We also modify the judgment adjudicating guilt to reflect appellant’s true name is 

LaShanda Williams.1 See id.

As modified, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Do Not Publish

TEX. R. APP. P. 47

130877F.U05

 1 Appellant’s name on the indictment and the written judgment adjudicating guilt was incorrectly spelled as LaShandra Williams 

and LaShondra Williams, respectively.

/Michael J. O'Neill/

MICHAEL J. O'NEILL

JUSTICE
-3-

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT

LASHANDA WILLIAMS, Appellant 

No. 05-13-00877-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Appeal from the 194th Judicial District 

Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 

F10-59807-M).

Opinion delivered by Justice O’Neill, 

Justices Bridges and Brown participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt is 

MODIFIED as follows:

Appellant’s name is modified to show “LaShanda Williams”

The section entitled “Terms of Plea Bargain” is modified to show “Open.”

The section entitled “(5) While on community supervision” is modified to show “(5) 

While on community supervision, Defendant violated the terms and conditions of community 

supervision as set out in the State’s amended Motion to Adjudicate Guilt.”

The section entitled “Executive/Suspension of Sentence” is modified to show “The Court 

orders Defendant’s sentence of confinement suspended.”

As modified, we AFFIRM the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt.

Judgment entered February 26, 2014.

/Michael J. O'Neill/

MICHAEL J. O'NEILL

JUSTICE