alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013225EN.01001201.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/12

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 13 June 2013 — Versalis SpA, formerly Polimeri Europa SpA v European Commission

(Case C-511/11 P) (1)

1

(Appeals - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Market in butadiene rubber and styrene-butadiene rubber manufactured by emulsion polymerisation - Fixing price targets, sharing clients by non-aggression agreements and exchanging commercial information - Evidence - Attributability of unlawful conduct - Amount of the fine - Gravity and duration of the infringement - Aggravating circumstance - Repeated infringement)

2013/C 225/18

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Versalis SpA, formerly Polimeri Europa SpA (represented by: M. Siragusa, F. Moretti and L. Nascimbene, avvocati)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci, L. Malferrari and G. Conte)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 13 July 2011 in Case T-59/05 Polimeri Europa v Commission by which that court dismissed the application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2006) 5700 of 29 November 2006 relating to a proceeding under Articles 81 EC and 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/F/38.638 — butadiene rubber and emulsion styrene-butadiene rubber) or, in the alternative, the annulment or reduction of the fine imposed on Polimeri Europa SpA — Infringement of the rights of the defence — Imputability of the infringement — Failure to state reasons

Polimeri Europa

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the main appeal and the cross-appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the main appeal and the cross-appeal;

| 2. | Orders Versalis SpA to pay the costs of the main appeal; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Versalis SpA to pay the costs of the main appeal;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs of the cross-appeal. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs of the cross-appeal.

---

(1)  OJ C 340, 19.11.2011.

1

---
S. 693 

One Hundred Sixteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and nineteen 

An Act 

To amend title 36, United States Code, to require that the POW/MIA flag be 

displayed on all days that the flag of the United States is displayed on certain 

Federal property. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National POW/MIA Flag Act’’. 

SEC. 2. DAYS ON WHICH THE POW/MIA FLAG IS DISPLAYED ON CERTAIN 

FEDERAL PROPERTY. 

Section 902 of title 36, United States Code, is amended by 

striking subsection (c) and inserting the following: 

‘‘(c) DAYS FOR FLAG DISPLAY.—For the purposes of this section, 

POW/MIA flag display days are all days on which the flag of 

the United States is displayed.’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
| **RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (Details Textual)** | 3 Months Ended |
|--------------------------------------------------|----------------|
||
| **Related Party Transaction [Line Items]**       |           |
| Percentage Of Annual Management Fee              | 0.375%         |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
The percentage of annual management fee.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**bctc_PercentageOfAnnualManagementFee**Namespace Prefix:**bctc_**Data Type:**num:percentItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                    |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Details**Name:**us-gaap_RelatedPartyTransactionLineItems**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM
10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       9,253,122
<SECURITIES>                                85,376,894
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,629,329
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (396,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    192,188
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           106,536,659
<PP&E>                                      11,307,359
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,102,290)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             124,728,418
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,019,663
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       280,206
<OTHER-SE>                                 117,244,796
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               124,728,418
<SALES>                                     12,768,854
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,768,854
<CGS>                                        4,264,375
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               32,676,676
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         (2,061,571)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (22,535,025)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    21,605
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (22,556,630)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (22,556,630)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.85)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.85)


</TABLE>
### §6734. Other provisions

#### (a) Judicial review

The appropriate United States district court shall have exclusive jurisdiction over litigation arising under this section 1 involving any redomesticating or redomesticated insurer.

#### (b) Severability

If any provision of this section,1 or the application thereof to any person or circumstances, is held invalid, the remainder of the section,1 and the application of such provision to other persons or circumstances, shall not be affected thereby.

(Pub. L. 106–102, title III, §314, Nov. 12, 1999, 113 Stat. 1420.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This section, referred to in text, probably should be a reference to this subtitle, meaning subtitle B (§§311–316) of title III of Pub. L. 106–102, which is classified generally to this subchapter.

1 See References in Text note below.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 576 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for a presumption of 

herbicide exposure for certain veterans who served in Korea, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2019 

Mr. MORAN (for himself, Mr. TESTER, Mr. BLUNT, Ms. WARREN, Mr. 

CRAMER, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mr. BROWN, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. MERKLEY, Mr. KING, Ms. BALDWIN, and Mr. WYDEN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for a 

presumption of herbicide exposure for certain veterans 

who served in Korea, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fairness for Korean 

5 DMZ Veterans Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 576 IS

1 SEC. 2. PRESUMPTION OF HERBICIDE EXPOSURE FOR CER2 TAIN VETERANS WHO SERVED IN KOREA. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 11 of title 38, United 

4 States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1116 

5 the following new section: 

6 ‘‘§ 1116A. Presumption of herbicide exposure for cer7 tain veterans who served in Korea 

8 ‘‘(a) PRESUMPTION OF SERVICE-CONNECTION.—(1) 

9 For the purposes of section 1110 of this title, and subject 

10 to section 1113 of this title, a disease specified in sub11 section (b) that becomes manifest as specified in that sub12 section in a veteran described in paragraph (2) shall be 

13 considered to have been incurred or aggravated in the line 

14 of duty in the active military, naval, or air service, not15 withstanding that there is no record of evidence of such 

16 disease during the period of such service. 

17 ‘‘(2) A veteran described in this paragraph is a vet18 eran who, during active military, naval, or air service, 

19 served in or near the Korean demilitarized zone (DMZ), 

20 during the period beginning on September 1, 1967, and 

21 ending on August 31, 1971. 

22 ‘‘(b) DISEASES.—A disease specified in this sub23 section is— 

24 ‘‘(1) a disease specified in paragraph (2) of 

25 subsection (a) of section 1116 of this title that be26 comes manifest as specified in that paragraph; or 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•S 576 IS

1 ‘‘(2) any additional disease that— 

2 ‘‘(A) the Secretary determines in regula3 tions warrants a presumption of service-connec4 tion by reason of having positive association 

5 with exposure to an herbicide agent; and 

6 ‘‘(B) becomes manifest within any period 

7 prescribed in such regulations. 

8 ‘‘(c) HERBICIDE AGENT.—For purposes of this sec9 tion, the term ‘herbicide agent’ has the meaning given 

10 such term in section 1821(d) of this title.’’. 

11 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

12 at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting 

13 after the item relating to section 1116 the following new 

14 item: 

‘‘1116A. Presumption of herbicide exposure for certain veterans who served in 

Korea.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
### §3810. Relationship to other laws

#### (a) Modification or waiver

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as authorizing the Secretary or any other official with respect to any activity pursuant to this chapter to modify or waive the application of any Federal, State or local laws dealing with the production, transportation, storage, safety, use or pricing of methane.

#### (b) Promulgation of rules

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as granting the Secretary or any other Federal official any authority to promulgate rules of general application to regulate the production, transportation, storage, safety, use or pricing of methane as a transportation fuel or vehicles which use methane as a transportation fuel.

(Pub. L. 96–512, §11, Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2833.)
# C_2011269EN.01001801.xml

| 10.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/18

---

Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 June 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank ’s-Gravenhage — Netherlands) — Bibi Mohammad Imran v Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken

(Case C-155/11 PPU) (1)

1

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - No need to adjudicate)

2011/C 269/30

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Rechtbank ’s-Gravenhage

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Bibi Mohammad Imran

Applicant:

Defendant: Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Rechtbank’s-Gravenhage — Interpretation of Article 7(2) of Council Directive 2003/86/EC of 22 September 2003 on the right to family reunification (OJ 2003 L 251, p. 12) — Conditions governing the exercise of that right — National legislation requiring a member of the family of a third-country national residing lawfully in the Member State concerned to pass a civic integration examination in order to be able to enter that Member State — Member of the family concerned being a mother of eight children, including seven minors, who are lawfully residing in the Member State concerned — Possibility of obtaining tuition in the third country of residence in the language of the Member State — Medical reasons or other grounds preventing the family member concerned from passing the integration examination within a reasonable period of time

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

It is not necessary to give a ruling on the request for a preliminary ruling submitted by the Rechtbank’s-Gravenhage (Netherlands), by decision of 31 March 2011.

---

(1)  OJ C 219, 23.7.2011.

1

---
### §78hh–1. Effective date of certain sections

This Act shall become effective on May 27, 1936; except that clause (2) of subsection (f) of section 78l of this title, and subsections (a) and (d) of section 78o of this title, shall become effective ninety days after May 27, 1936, and that clause (3) of subsection (f) of section 78l of this title shall become effective six months after May 27, 1936.

(May 27, 1936, ch. 462, §12, 49 Stat. 1380.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is act May 27, 1936, ch. 462, 49 Stat. 1375, popularly known as the Unlisted Securities Trading Act, which enacted sections 78l–1, 78o–1, 78o–2, and 78hh–1 of this title, and amended sections 78l, 78o, 78q, 78r, 78t, 78u, 78w, and 78ff of this title.

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as a part of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 which comprises this chapter.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
     STATEMENTS OF GABLES RESIDENTIAL TRUST FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
     1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
     STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000913782
<NAME>                                         Gables Residential Trust
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         15,071
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         1,681,961
<DEPRECIATION>                                 138,239
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,586,317
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        812,788
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          4,500
<PREFERRED>                                    115,000
<COMMON>                                       263
<OTHER-SE>                                     440,963
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,586,317
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               216,624
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  125,371
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               5,637
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             40,958
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                35,769
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            28,040
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   28,040
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  1.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.16
        

</TABLE>
Page 1 of 5
 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 2 of 5
 

 

Page 3 of 5
Page 4 of 5
 

Page 5 of 5
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 12, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-10481 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOE MARY REYES, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:88-CR-71-ALL

-------------------- Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Joe Mary Reyes has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Reyes has filed a letter response to the motion. Our independent review of counsel’s brief, Reyes’s letter response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 526 

To withdraw certain Bureau of Land Management land from mineral 

development. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2019 

Mr. HEINRICH (for himself and Mr. UDALL) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To withdraw certain Bureau of Land Management land from 

mineral development. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Buffalo Tract Protec5 tion Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. WITHDRAWAL. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to valid existing rights, 

8 the Bureau of Land Management land described in sub9 section (b) is withdrawn from all forms of mineral developVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:20 Feb 23, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S526.IS S526

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 526 IS

1 ment under all laws pertaining to mineral leasing or min2 eral materials, including locatable minerals. 

3 (b) BLM LAND DESCRIBED.—The Bureau of Land 

4 Management land referred to in subsection (a) is the land 

5 identified as ‘‘Tract A’’, ‘‘Tract B’’, ‘‘Tract C’’, and 

6 ‘‘Tract D’’ on the map entitled ‘‘Placitas, New Mexico 

7 Area Map’’ and dated March 11, 2016. 

8 (c) DISPOSAL OF SURFACE ESTATE.— 

9 (1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2), 

10 nothing in this section prohibits the disposal of the 

11 surface estate of the Bureau of Land Management 

12 land described in subsection (b) under— 

13 (A) the Federal Land Policy and Manage14 ment Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.); or 

15 (B) the Act of June 14, 1926 (commonly 

16 known as the ‘‘Recreation and Public Purposes 

17 Act’’) (43 U.S.C. 869 et seq.). 

18 (2) OWNERSHIP OF MINERAL ESTATE.—Any 

19 disposal of the surface estate of the Bureau of Land 

20 Management land described in subsection (b) shall 

21 be subject to the condition that the mineral estate 

22 of that land shall remain under the ownership of the 

23 Bureau of Land Management, subject to the with24 drawal described in subsection (a). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
§ 1c.1 Prohibition of natural gas market manipulation. ( a ) It shall be unlawful for any entity, directly or indirectly, in connection with the purchase or sale of natural gas or the purchase or sale of transportation services subject to the jurisdiction of the Commission, ( 1 ) To use or employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud,
( 2 ) To make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading, or
( 3 ) To engage in any act, practice, or course of business that operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any entity.
( b ) Nothing in this section shall be construed to create a private right of action.
### §77xxx. Unlawful representations

It shall be unlawful for any person in offering, selling or issuing any security to represent or imply in any manner whatsoever that any action or failure to act by the Commission in the administration of this subchapter means that the Commission has in any way passed upon the merits of, or given approval to, any trustee, indenture or security, or any transaction or transactions therein, or that any such action or failure to act with regard to any statement or report filed with or examined by the Commission pursuant to this subchapter or any rule, regulation, or order thereunder, has the effect of a finding by the Commission that such statement or report is true and accurate on its face or that it is not false or misleading.

(May 27, 1933, ch. 38, title III, §324, as added Aug. 3, 1939, ch. 411, 53 Stat. 1176; amended Aug. 10, 1954, ch. 667, title III, §305, 68 Stat. 688.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1954—Act Aug. 10, 1954, substituted "offering, selling, or issuing" for "issuing or selling".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1954 Amendment

Amendment by act Aug. 10, 1954, effective 60 days after Aug. 10, 1954, see note under section 77b of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of Securities and Exchange Commission, with certain exceptions, to Chairman of such Commission, see Reorg. Plan No. 10 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3175, 64 Stat. 1265, set out under section 78d of this title.