alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §6304. Safety standards

No person may arrange, promote, organize, produce, or fight in a professional boxing match without meeting each of the following requirements or an alternative requirement in effect under regulations of a boxing commission that provides equivalent protection of the health and safety of boxers:

(1) A physical examination of each boxer by a physician certifying whether or not the boxer is physically fit to safely compete, copies of which must be provided to the boxing commission.

(2) Except as otherwise expressly provided under regulation of a boxing commission promulgated subsequent to October 9, 1996, an ambulance or medical personnel with appropriate resuscitation equipment continuously present on site.

(3) A physician continuously present at ringside.

(4) Health insurance for each boxer to provide medical coverage for any injuries sustained in the match.

(Pub. L. 104–272, §5, Oct. 9, 1996, 110 Stat. 3310.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective July 1, 1997, see section 23(2) of Pub. L. 104–272, set out as a note under section 6301 of this title.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

PETER I. SHAH,

 Appellant 

v.

MAPLE ENERGY HOLDINGS, LLC,

Appellee

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-22-00198-CV

Appeal from the

143rd Judicial District Court

of Reeves County, Texas

(TC# 22-03-24342-CVR)

SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION

In our opinion dated July 31, 2023, we suggested a remittitur of $9,738.00 of the attorney’s 

fees awarded to Appellee Maple Energy. We stated that if Maple Energy filed a remittitur within 

15 days from the date of the opinion, we would modify the judgment with respect to the award of 

attorney’s fees, reducing the attorney’s fees award to $85,416.50, and affirming the trial court’s 

judgment as modified. 

On August 8, 2023, Maple Energy timely filed its consent to the suggestion of remittitur 

and asked the Court to modify the trial court’s judgment to reflect an award of attorney’s fees in 

the amount of $85,416.50. Accordingly, we vacate our judgment, but not our opinion, dated July 

31, 2023, and modify the trial court’s judgment with respect to the award of attorney’s fees to 

reflect the remittitur of $9,738.00. The trial court’s judgment is therefore modified to award Maple 
Energy $85,416.50 in attorney’s fees as the total money judgment in its favor. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

46.3. As modified, we affirm the trial court’s judgment. This Court’s July 31, 2023 opinion 

otherwise remains in effect.

LISA J. SOTO, Justice

August 31, 2023

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Soto, JJ.
Exhibit 13.1
 CERTIFICATION
 Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code)
 
 Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Millicom International Cellular, S.A. a company incorporated under the laws of the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:
 The Amendment No. 1 on Form 20-F/A to the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2019 (the “Report”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Amendment No. 1 on Form 20-F/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: March 13, 2020
 By:/s/ Mauricio RamosName:   Mauricio RamosTitle:   President and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 23.1**

Report and Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

TriQuint Semiconductor, Inc.: 

Under date of March 11,2008, we reported on the consolidated balance sheets of TriQuint Semiconductor, Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each ofthe years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, as contained in the annual report on Form 10-K for the year 2007. In connection with our audits of the aforementioned consolidated financial statements, we also audited the relatedconsolidated financial statement schedule as listed in the accompanying index. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statementschedules based on our audits. 

In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financialstatements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein. 

We consent to the incorporation by reference inthe registration statement (No. 333-81245, 333-36112, 333-75464, 333-08891, 333-08893, 333-02166, 333-31585, 333-48883, 333-66707, 333-74617, 333-81273, 333-39732, 333-39730, 333-61582, 333-65850, 333-89242, 333-102085, 333-105701, 333-115809,333-120407, 333-125269, 333-134470, 333-143337) on Form S-8 of TriQuint Semiconductor, Inc. of our report dated March 11, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of TriQuint Semiconductor, Inc. as of December 31, 2007 and2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, and the related financial statement schedule, and the effectivenessof internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, which report appears in the December 31, 2007 annual report on Form 10-K of TriQuint Semiconductor, Inc. 

**As discussed in note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Interpretation No. 48, *Accounting for Uncertainty inIncome Taxes*and adopted Emerging Issues Task Force Issue (EITF) No. 06-02, *Accounting for Sabbatical Leave and Other Similar Benefits Pursuant to FASB Statement No. 43.*

As discussed in note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards(SFAS) No. 123(R), *Share-Based Payments*. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Portland, OR 

March 11, 2008
### §717t–1. Civil penalty authority

#### (a) In general

Any person that violates this chapter, or any rule, regulation, restriction, condition, or order made or imposed by the Commission under authority of this chapter, shall be subject to a civil penalty of not more than $1,000,000 per day per violation for as long as the violation continues.

#### (b) Notice

The penalty shall be assessed by the Commission after notice and opportunity for public hearing.

#### (c) Amount

In determining the amount of a proposed penalty, the Commission shall take into consideration the nature and seriousness of the violation and the efforts to remedy the violation.

(June 21, 1938, ch. 556, §22, as added Pub. L. 109–58, title III, §314(b)(1)(B), Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 691.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 22 of act June 21, 1938, was renumbered section 24 and is classified to section 717u of this title.
BEFORE SHE’S TOO COOL FOR MOM 

TO DROP HER OFF AT SCHOOL...

Take advantage of this time to talk about prescription 

medicine safety.

Start talking to your children early to ensure they understand what opioids are 

and the risks of misusing prescription medicine. Though it may not seem like it, 

children really hear your concerns. For tips on how—and when—to begin the 

conversation, visit:

www.underagedrinking.samhsa.gov

SMA-18-5092FLY
### §2933. United States Global Change Research Program

The President shall establish an interagency United States Global Change Research Program to improve understanding of global change. The Program shall be implemented by the Plan developed under section 2934 of this title.

(Pub. L. 101–606, title I, §103, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3098.)
# C_2013046EN.01002701.xml

| 16.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/27

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 11 December 2012 — Cocchi and Falcione v Commission

(Case F-122/10) (1)

1

(Civil service - Officials - Pension - Transfer of pension rights acquired under a national pension - Withdrawal of a transfer proposal - Measure not having conferred subjective rights or other similar benefits)

2013/C 46/49

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Giorgio Cocchi (Wezembeek-Oppem, Belgium) and Nicola Falcione (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi and J.-N. Louis, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Martin and J. Baquero Cruz, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Civil service — Annulment of the decision to withdraw a proposal relating to transfer of the applicants’ pension rights when already accepted by them

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | The European Commission’s decisions of 12 and 23 February 2010 are annulled in so far as they withdraw the proposals put to Mr Cocchi and Mr Falcione indicating the result in additional pension annuities to be generated by a potential transfer of rights; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The European Commission’s decisions of 12 and 23 February 2010 are annulled in so far as they withdraw the proposals put to Mr Cocchi and Mr Falcione indicating the result in additional pension annuities to be generated by a potential transfer of rights;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Order the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay one-third of those incurred by Mr Cocchi and Mr Falcione; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Order the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay one-third of those incurred by Mr Cocchi and Mr Falcione;

| 4. | Orders Mr Cocchi and Mr Falcione to bear two-thirds of their costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders Mr Cocchi and Mr Falcione to bear two-thirds of their costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 63, 26.2.11, p. 34.

1

---
#   NSDUH 2024 Screening Specifications

Browse the screening questionnaire used to determine respondent eligibility for the full 2024 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) interview. The documents include the exact questions as they appear in the screener, along with the skip patterns that determined whether a person was asked a question or not. There are two versions available – one for in-person screenings and another for web screenings. Both include English and Spanish language questions.

National Survey on Drug Use and Health

### Part of Collection:

NSDUH 2024 Methodological Resource Book (MRB)

                        -  View/Download Files 
                        -  Other Related Reports 
                        -  Report Resources 

### View/Download Files

                                    - Web Screener Specifications(pdf | 487.51 KB)
                                    - In-Person Screener Specifications(pdf | 512.89 KB)

### Other Related Reports

NSDUH 2024 Field Interviewer Manual

Collected Date: 2024 | Published Date: February 29, 2024 | Type: National Survey on Drug Use and Health

NSDUH 2024 Questionnaire

Collected Date: 2024 | Published Date: February 29, 2024 | Type: National Survey on Drug Use and Health

NSDUH 2024 Showcards

Collected Date: 2024 | Published Date: February 29, 2024 | Type: National Survey on Drug Use and Health

### Report Resources

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Data Archive (SAMHDA)'s page about NSDUH.

 < Back to Main content
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Wade Drummond, Appellant.

[824 NYS2d 126]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marrus, J.), rendered March 18, 1998, convicting him of menacing in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the admission into evidence of a tape of a 911 emergency telephone call in which the complain*493ant sought help in an ongoing emergency situation violated his right under the Confrontation Clause. Since the defendant failed to object with sufficient specificity that the admission of the 911 tape violated his Sixth Amendment right of confrontation, he failed to preserve the issue for appellate review *(see People v Gray,*86 NY2d 10, 19-21 [1995]; *People v Marino,*21 AD3d 430, 431 [2005]). In any event, admission of the complainant’s statements to the 911 operator did not violate the defendant’s right of confrontation because the statements were not testimonial *(see Davis v Washington,*547 US —, 126 S Ct 2266 [June 19, 2006]; *People v Marino, supra).*Finally, because the defendant was afforded “meaningful representation” at trial, his ineffective assistance of counsel argument must fail *(see People v Benevento,*91 NY2d 708, 712 [1998]). Schmidt, J.P, Adams, Dillon and Covello, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
32.1


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Viasystems Group, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the “Report”) filed with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, David M.
Sindelar, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge:





The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ David M.
Sindelar


David M.
Sindelar


Chief
Executive Officer


(Principal
Executive Officer)


May 17,
2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          12,603
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   99,342
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,051
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               433,406
<PP&E>                                         680,527
<DEPRECIATION>                                 612,892
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 503,074
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,830,816
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                     3,485,412
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   503,074
<SALES>                                        184,605
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               184,605
<CGS>                                            1,026
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,026
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               198,738
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,720
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (38,879)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (38,879)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (38,879)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.00)
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
Quarter Ended June 29, 2003 (the "Report") by Overhill Farms, Inc.
("Registrant"), the undersigned hereby certifies that:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         Registrant.



Date:  August 13, 2003                            /s/  John L. Steinbrun
                                                  --------------------------
                                                  John L. Steinbrun
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
Crisis Counseling Assistance and Training Program

Trainer’s Toolkit

Handout 2

Crisis Counseling Assistance and Training Program

Typical Timeline

Rev. 2/2013
Crisis Counseling Assistance and Training Program

Typical Timeline
### §9095. Protection of collective bargaining agreements

#### (a) In general

Neither the Secretary, nor any other actor, department, or agency of the Federal Government, shall condition the issuance of financial assistance under this part on a passenger air carrier's or contractor's implementation of measures to enter into negotiations with the certified bargaining representative of a craft or class of employees of the passenger air carrier or contractor under the Railway Labor Act (45 U.S.C. 151 et seq.) or the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 151 et seq.), regarding pay or other terms and conditions of employment.

#### (b) Passenger air carrier period of effect

With respect to any passenger air carrier to which financial assistance is provided under this part, this section shall be in effect with respect to the passenger air carrier for the period beginning on the date on which the passenger air carrier is first issued such financial assistance and ending on March 31, 2021.

#### (c) Contractor period of effect

With respect to any contractor to which financial assistance is provided under this part, this section shall be in effect with respect to the contractor beginning on the date on which the contractor is first issued such financial assistance and ending on March 31, 2021, or until the date on which all funds are expended, whichever is later.

(Pub. L. 116–260, div. N, title IV, §405, Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2057.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This part, referred to in text, was in the original "this subtitle", meaning subtitle A (§§401–412) of title IV of div. N of Pub. L. 116–260, Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2052, which enacted this part and amended sections 9041, 9071, and 9074 of this title. For complete classification of subtitle A to the Code, see Tables.

The Railway Labor Act, referred to in subsec. (a), is act May 20, 1926, ch. 347, 44 Stat. 577, which is classified principally to chapter 8 (§151 et seq.) of Title 45, Railroads. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 151 of Title 45 and Tables.

The National Labor Relations Act, referred to in subsec. (a), is act July 5, 1935, ch. 372, 49 Stat. 449, which is classified generally to subchapter II (§151 et seq.) of chapter 7 of Title 29, Labor. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 167 of Title 29 and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Economic Aid to Hard-Hit Small Businesses, Nonprofits, and Venues Act, and also as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, and not as part of the CARES Act which in part comprises this chapter.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. FDA-2011-N-0110]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is providing notice of an extension of memorandum of understanding (MOU) between FDA and Servicio Nacional de Sanidad, Inocuidad y Calidad Agroalimentaria of the United Mexican States. The purpose of the MOU is to establish, and build confidence in, a system that increases the likelihood that cantaloupes from Mexico offered for import into the United States comply with U.S. law. This MOU also establishes a risk-based classification system for firms in Mexico producing cantaloupes for import into the United States to protect the public health.

# DATES:

The agreement became effective on October 26, 2005, amended on April 19, 2007, and extended on October 28, 2010, for 1 year.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Naomi Kawin, Office of Global Engagement, Office of International Programs, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 31, rm. 3416, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-8372, FAX: 301-595-7941.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with 21 CFR 20.108(c), which states that all written agreements and MOUs between FDA and others shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    , the Agency is publishing notice of this MOU.                

Dated: March 9, 2011.

Leslie Kux,

Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.

      ( print page 14031)          ( print page 14032)    

BILLING CODE 4160-01-P

[FR Doc. 2011-5944 Filed 3-14-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-C