alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 385.216 Withdrawal of pleadings (Rule 216). ( a ) *Filing.* Any person that filed a pleading may seek to withdraw it by filing a notice of withdrawal. The procedures provided in this section do not apply to withdrawals of tariff or rate filings, which may be withdrawn only as provided in the regulations under this chapter.
( b ) *Action on withdrawals.* ( 1 ) The withdrawal of any pleading is effective at the end of 15 days from the date of filing of a notice of withdrawal, if no motion in opposition to the notice of withdrawal is filed within that period and the decisional authority does not issue an order disallowing the withdrawal within that period. The decisional authority may disallow, for a good cause, all or part of a withdrawal.
( 2 ) If a motion in opposition to a notice of withdrawal is filed within the 15 day period, the withdrawal is not effective until the decisional authority issues an order accepting the withdrawal.
( c ) *Conditional withdrawal.* In order to prevent prejudice to other participants, a decisional authority may, on motion or otherwise, condition the withdrawal of any pleading upon a requirement that the withdrawing person leave material in the record or otherwise make material available to other participants.
[Order 225, 47 FR 19022, May 3, 1982, as amended by Order 714, 73 FR 57538, Oct. 3, 2008; Order 846, 83 FR 23808, May 23, 2018]
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 00-1113

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

COMMONWEALTH ENERGY SYSTEM AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES,

Defendant, Appellee.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on December 21, 2000, is

amended as follows:

On page 5, line 10: change the word "directly" to "indirectly."
§ 3a.12 Authority to classify official information. ( a ) The authority to classify information or material originally under E.O. 11652 is restricted to those offices within the executive branch which are concerned with matters of national security, and is limited to the minimum number absolutely required for efficient administration.
( b ) The authority to classify information or material originally as Top Secret is to be exercised only by such officials as the President may designate in writing and by the heads of the following departments and agencies and such of their principal staff officials as the heads of these departments and agencies may designate in writing; Such offices in the Executive Office of the President as the President may designate in writing. Central Intelligence Agency. Atomic Energy Commission. Department of State. Department of the Treasury. Department of Defense. Department of the Army. Department of the Navy. Department of the Air Force. U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency Department of Justice. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Agency for International Development.
( c ) The authority to classify information or material originally as Secret is exercised only by: ( 1 ) Officials who have Top Secret classification authority under § 3a.11(b); and
( 2 ) The heads of the following departments and agencies and such principal staff officials as they may designate in writing: Department of Transportation. Federal Communications Commission. Export-Import Bank of the United States. Department of Commerce. U.S. Civil Service Commission. U.S. Information Agency. General Services Administration. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Civil Aeronautics Board. Federal Maritime Commission. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. National Science Foundation. Overseas Private Investment Corporation.
( d ) The authority to classify information or material originally as Confidential is exercised by officials who have Top Secret or Secret classification authority.
( e ) Pursuant to E.O. 11652, the authority to classify information or material originally as Secret or Confidential in the FERC shall be exercised only by the Chairman, the Vice Chairman, and the Executive Director. When an incumbent change occurs in these positions, the name of the new incumbent will be reported to the Interagency Classification Review Committee NSC.
[Order 470, 38 FR 5161, Feb. 26, 1973, as amended by Order 756, 77 FR 4893, Feb. 1, 2012]
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 50 (Tuesday, March 15, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 14035]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6023]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Notice of Establishment

    Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 
U.S.C. app.), the Director, National Institutes of Health (NIH), 
announces the establishment of the NCI-Frederick Advisory Committee.
    The Council will provide advice and recommendations to the 
Director, National Cancer Institute (NCI), and the Associate Director, 
NCI-Frederick, on the optimal use of the NCI-Frederick facility to 
rapidly meet the most urgent needs of the NCI. The Committee will 
consist of 16 members, including the Chair, appointed by the Director, 
NCI. Members will be authorities knowledgeable in drug and vaccine 
development, clinical trials support, AIDS research, bioinformatics, 
genomics, nanotechnology, biological repositories, and basic research 
in immunology and infectious diseases.
    Duration of this committee is continuing unless formally determined 
by the Director, NCI that termination would be in the best interest of 
the public.

    Dated: March 9, 2011.
Francis S. Collins,
Director, National Institutes of Health.
[FR Doc. 2011-6023 Filed 3-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### § 154.306 Cash working capital.

A natural gas company that files a tariff change under this part may not receive a cash working capital adjustment to its rate base unless the company or other participant in a rate proceeding under this part demonstrates, with a fully developed and reliable lead-lag study, a net revenue receipt lag or a net expense payment lag (revenue lead). Any demonstrated net revenue receipt lag will be credited to rate base; and, any demonstrated net expense payment lag will be deducted from rate base.
# C_2013009EN.01001801.xml

| 12.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 9/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/18

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 November 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Antwerpen — Belgium) — KGH Belgium NV v Belgische Staat

(Case C-351/11) (1)

1

(Customs debt - Post-clearance recovery of import or export duties - Entry of duty in the accounts - Practical procedures)

2013/C 9/27

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Antwerpen

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: KGH Belgium NV

Applicant:

Defendant: Belgische Staat

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Antwerpen — Interpretation of Article 217(1) and (2) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ 1992 L 302, p. 1) — Post-clearance recovery of import or export duties — Entry in the accounts of the duties — Practical procedures

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 217(2) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 82/97 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 December 1996, must be interpreted as meaning that, since that article does not lay down any practical procedures for the entry in the accounts within the meaning of that provision, the Member States are free to determine the practical procedures for the entry in the accounts of amounts of duty resulting from a customs debt, without being under an obligation to determine, in their national legislation, how the entry in the accounts is to be made. That entry must be made in a way which ensures that the competent customs authorities enter the exact amount of the import duty or export duty resulting from a customs debt in the accounting records or on any other equivalent medium, so that, inter alia, the entry in the accounts of the amounts concerned may be established with certainty, including with regard to the person liable.

---

(1)  OJ C 282, 24.9.2011.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Feather Valley  Financial,
Ltd.,  on Form  10-QSB for the  period  ending  June 30,  2002 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "REPORT"),  the
undersigned,  Raul Castro,  Chief  Executive  Officer and  Principal  Accounting
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ Raul Castro
Raul Castro
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §78o–8. Universal ratings symbols

#### (a) Rulemaking

The Commission shall require, by rule, each nationally recognized statistical rating organization to establish, maintain, and enforce written policies and procedures that—

(1) assess the probability that an issuer of a security or money market instrument will default, fail to make timely payments, or otherwise not make payments to investors in accordance with the terms of the security or money market instrument;

(2) clearly define and disclose the meaning of any symbol used by the nationally recognized statistical rating organization to denote a credit rating; and

(3) apply any symbol described in paragraph (2) in a manner that is consistent for all types of securities and money market instruments for which the symbol is used.

#### (b) Rule of construction

Nothing in this section shall prohibit a nationally recognized statistical rating organization from using distinct sets of symbols to denote credit ratings for different types of securities or money market instruments.

(Pub. L. 111–203, title IX, §938, July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 1885.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Investor Protection and Securities Reform Act of 2010 and also as part of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and not as part of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 1 day after July 21, 2010, except as otherwise provided, see section 4 of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as a note under section 5301 of Title 12, Banks and Banking.

#### Definitions

For definitions of terms used in this section, see section 5301 of Title 12, Banks and Banking.
### **CHAPTER 2B–1—SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION**

Sec.
78aaa.
Short title.
78bbb.
Application of Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
78ccc.
Securities Investor Protection Corporation.
78ddd.
SIPC Fund.
78eee.
Protection of customers.
78fff.
General provisions of a liquidation proceeding.
78fff–1.
Powers and duties of a trustee.
78fff–2.
Special provisions of a liquidation proceeding.
78fff–3.
SIPC advances.
78fff–4.
Direct payment procedure.
78ggg.
SEC functions.
78hhh.
Examining authority functions.
78iii.
Functions of self-regulatory organizations.
78jjj.
Prohibited acts.
78kkk.
Miscellaneous provisions.
78 lll.
Definitions.
Order filed April 13, 2021. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-21-00141-CV

____________

WLSC INCOPRO, LLC, Appellant

V.

ADMIRAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 152nd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2017-24459

O R D E R

The notice of appeal in this case was filed March 12, 2021. To date, the 

filing fee of $205.00 has not been paid. No evidence that appellant is excused by 

statute or the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure from paying costs has been filed. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 5. Therefore, the court issues the following order. 

Appellant is ordered to pay the filing fee in the amount of $205.00 to the 

clerk of this court on or before April 28, 2021. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. If appellant 

fails to timely pay the filing fee in accordance with this order, the appeal will be 

dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Hassan.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

March 24, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

135655 & (13) Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 135655 

 COA: 281749 

Kalamazoo CC: 06-002397-FH;

DEMOND LAMAR MCDONALD, 07-000044-FH 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal the December 7, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented 

should be reviewed by this Court. 

d0317 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

March 24, 2008 

 Clerk
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T21:19:45-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
Exhibit 10.12


August 12, 2002


Dear Michael,

         This letter formalizes our prior discussions and agreement on the terms
of a potential severance arrangement as follows:

1. In the event both that Virage,  Inc. is acquired by another  company and that
you are terminated  without cause as a direct result thereof,  then you shall be
entitled to receive  six (6) months of your  then-current  base salary  (without
including  commission,  bonuses,  benefits or other  compensation) as severance,
subject to your executing Virage's or its acquiror's  standard release of claims
and confidentiality agreement.

2. All other terms and conditions of your original  signed offer letter continue
in full force and effect.  Nothing herein changes the fact that your  employment
with  Virage  is for  no  specified  period  of  time  and  constitutes  at-will
employment. As a result, Virage is free to terminate its employment relationship
with you at any time, with cause or without cause.

         Your signature  below  indicates your assent and agreement to the terms
and conditions of this letter  agreement,  and executes this letter agreement as
of the date first set forth above.


                                                            Sincerely,



                                                            Paul G. Lego
                                                            C.E.O. and President
                                                            Virage, Inc.


Agreed to and Accepted by:

Michael H. Lock


------------------------------------
Signature


------------------------------------
Date
### §715l. Repealed. June 22, 1942, ch. 436, 56 Stat. 381

Section, acts Feb. 22, 1935, ch. 18, §13, 49 Stat. 33; June 14, 1937, ch. 335, 50 Stat. 257; June 29, 1939, ch. 250, 53 Stat. 927, provided for expiration of this chapter on June 30, 1942.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 49 (Monday, March 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 13660]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5767]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLAK910000-L13100000.PP0000-L.X.SS.052L0000]


Notice of Public Meeting, BLM-Alaska Resource Advisory Council

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Alaska State Office, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
(FLPMA) and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), the U.S. 
Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Alaska 
Resource Advisory Council (RAC) will meet as indicated below.

DATES: The meeting will be held April 26-27, 2011, in the National 
Business Center Aviation Management, Alaska Regional Office, 4405 Lear 
Court, Anchorage, Alaska 99502. On April 26, the meeting starts at 1 
p.m. in the training room. On April 27, the meeting begins in the same 
location at 9 a.m. and the council will accept public comment from 11 
a.m.-noon.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thom Jennings, RAC Coordinator; BLM-
Alaska State Office; 222 W. 7th Avenue <greek-i>13; Anchorage, AK 
99513. Telephone 907-271-3546 or 907-271-4418 or e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6b1f010e050502050c2b090706450c041d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="92e6f8f7fcfcfbfcf5d2f0feffbcf5fde4">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 15-member Council advises the Secretary 
of the Interior, through the Bureau of Land Management, on a variety of 
planning and management issues associated with public land management 
in Alaska. At this meeting, topics planned for discussion include:
    <bullet> Manager reports
    <bullet> Wild Lands Policy
    <bullet> Resource management planning
    <bullet> Other topics of interest to the RAC
    All meetings are open to the public. Depending on the number of 
people wishing to comment and time available, the time for individual 
oral comments may be limited, so be prepared to submit written comments 
if necessary. Before including your address, phone number, e-mail 
address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you 
should be aware that your entire comment--including your personal 
identifying information--may be made publicly available at any time. 
While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal 
identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we 
will be able to do so.
    Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as 
sign language interpretation, transportation, or other reasonable 
accommodations, should contact the BLM RAC Coordinator listed above.

    Dated: March 8, 2011.
Bud C. Cribley,
State Director.
[FR Doc. 2011-5767 Filed 3-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JA-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 12.1

Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges

|                                             |                                                                | Years ended        
|-------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------
|
|Income (loss) before extraordinary item      |                                                                | $                  
|Add: fixed charges, net capitalized interest |                                                                |                    
|                                             |                                                                |                    
|                                             | Earnings (loss) before fixed charges                           |                    
|                                             |                                                                |                    
|Fixed charges:                               |                                                                |                    
|                                             | Interest expense including amortization of debt issuance costs |                    
|                                             | Capitalized interest                                           |                    
|                                             |                                                                |                    
|                                             |                                                                | Total fixed charges
|                                             |                                                                |                    
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges           |                                                                |                    
|                                             |                                                                |                    

---

---

QuickLinks
#### Darcy Palmer, Individually and as Parent and Natural Guardian of Brittany P., an Infant, Respondent, v Barnes & Noble Booksellers, Inc., Appellant.

[824 NYS2d 850]

*1288Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Joseph R Glownia, J.), entered February 1, 2006 in a personal injury action. The order denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this negligence action to recover damages for injuries sustained by her daughter when her daughter’s finger was pinched in the space between a closing door and its door jamb on defendant’s premises. Supreme Court erred in denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Defendant met its initial burden by establishing that the door and door jamb did not constitute an unreasonably dangerous condition *(see Swan v Eastman Kodak*Co., 16 AD3d 1098, 1099 [2005]; *Tedesco v Nowak,*294 AD2d 911, 912 [2002], *lv denied*98 NY2d 610 [2002]), and plaintiff failed to raise a question of fact *(see generally Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). “The affidavit of . . . plaintiff!’s] expert did not sufficiently identify any specific industry standard upon which he relied in regard to the [door], nor did [it] supply any specific statutory or building code violations” *(Veccia v Clearmeadow Pistol Club,*300 AD2d 472, 472 [2002]). The affidavit “was thus speculative and not sufficiently probative to defeat defendant’s motion for summary judgment” *(Baehre v Sagamore Resort Hotel, 4*AD3d 810, 811 [2004]; *see Torres v West St. Realty Co.,*21 AD3d 718, 721 [2005], *lv denied*7 NY3d 703 [2006]; *Cicero v Selden*Assoc., 295 AD2d 391, 392 [2002]; *see generally Diaz v New York Downtown Hosp.,*99 NY2d 542, 544 [2002]). We therefore reverse the order, grant defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and dismiss the complaint. Present—Hurlbutt, A.P.J., Kehoe, Smith and Green, JJ.