alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1307.9 Conduct of investigations. ( a ) *Periodic compliance reviews.* TVA shall from time to time review the practices of recipients to determine whether they are complying with this part.
( b ) *Complaints.* Any individual who claims (individually or on behalf of any specific class of individuals) to have been subjected to discrimination prohibited by this part may, personally or by a representative, file with TVA a written complaint. A complaint must be filed not later than ninety (90) days from the date of the alleged discrimination, unless the time for filing is extended by TVA.
( c ) *Investigations.* TVA will make a prompt investigation whenever a compliance review, report, complaint, or any other information indicates a possible failure to comply with this part. The investigation shall include, where appropriate, a review of the pertinent practices and policies of the recipient, the circumstances under which the possible noncompliance with this part occurred, and other factors relevant to a determination as to whether the recipient has failed to comply with this part.
( d ) *Resolution of matters.* ( 1 ) If an investigation pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section indicates a failure to comply with this part, TVA will so inform the recipient and the matter will be resolved by informal means whenever possible. If TVA determines that the matter cannot be resolved by informal means, action will be taken as provided for in § 1307.10.
( 2 ) If an investigation does not warrant action pursuant to paragraph (d) (1) of this section, TVA will so inform the recipient and the complainant, if any, in writing.
( e ) *Intimidatory or retaliatory acts prohibited.* No recipient or other person shall intimidate, threaten, coerce, or discriminate against any individual for the purpose of interfering with any right or privilege secured by section 504 or this part, or because the individual had made a complaint, testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing under this part. The identity of complainants shall be kept confidential except to the extent necessary to carry out the purposes of this part, including the conduct of any investigation, hearing, or judicial proceeding arising thereunder.
§ 401.115 Discretionary disclosure by the Executive Director. ( a ) The Executive Director may exercise discretion to disclose part or all of any Commission record that is otherwise exempt from disclosure pursuant to this part whenever the Executive Director determines that such disclosure is in the public interest, will promote the objectives of the Commission, and is consistent with the rights of individuals to privacy, the property rights of persons in trade secrets, and the need for the Commission to promote frank internal policy deliberations and to pursue its regulatory activities without disruption.
( b ) Discretionary disclosure of a record pursuant to this section shall invoke the requirement that the record shall be disclosed to any person who requests it pursuant to § 401.108, but shall not set a precedent for discretionary disclosure of any similar or related record and shall not obligate the Executive Director to disclose any other record that is exempt from disclosure.
[89 FR 51828, June 20, 2024]
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 November 6, 2009
    By:
    /s/ Rocco B. CommissoRocco B. CommissoChairman and Chief Executive OfficerBy:
    /s/ Mark E. StephanMark E. StephanExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### § 557.25 Disposition procedures for fish and fish products condemned or ordered destroyed under import inspection.

Disposition procedures for condemned fish or fish products ordered destroyed under import inspection are as those for carcasses, parts, meat, and meat food products under 9 CFR 327.25.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Service Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark L. Abbate, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-B (Item 601(b)(32))
promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Securities Act) and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act). In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not
be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ MARK L. ABBATE     
|Mark L. Abbate         
|Chief Financial Officer
|February 13, 2009
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 23-50377

Summary Calendar

____________

Michael J. Major, 

Plaintiff—Appellant,

versus

State Bar of Texas, 

Defendant—Appellee.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 1:23-CV-256

______________________________

Before Clement, Southwick, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

After review of Appellant’s brief and of the record, we agree with the 

district court that no nonfrivolous issue is presented. The appeal is therefore 

DISMISSED as frivolous. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2; see also 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i).

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 27, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 23-50377 Document: 00516801522 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/27/2023
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.50


The Agreement and General Release dated as of August 28, 2015 by and between Bally Gaming, Inc., Scientific Games Corporation and Kathryn Lever (filed as Exhibit 10.49 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, the "Agreement") was subsequently amended by the parties via electronic mail on five occasions, in each case to amend Section 1 of the Agreement to provide that the “Separation Date” would be at later dates in September and then October 2015.  The fifth email amendment provided that the “Separation Date” would be effective as of 11:59 on October 30, 2015.  
    
The Agreement was subsequently amended by the Sixth Amendment to Agreement and General Release dated as of November 3, 2015 by and between Bally Gaming, Inc., Scientific Games Corporation and Kathryn Lever (filed as Exhibit 10.51 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015).
### §636j. Repealed. Pub. L. 116–6, div. D, title V, §532, Feb. 15, 2019, 133 Stat. 180

Section, Pub. L. 110–234, title XII, §12085, May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1421; Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title XII, §12085, June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 2183, related to expedited disaster assistance loan program.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 48 (Friday, March 11, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 13404]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5846]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: Federal Election Commission.

DATE AND TIME: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 at 10 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public.

Items To Be Discussed

Correction and Approval of the Minutes for the Meeting of March 3, 2011
Draft Advisory Opinion 2011-03: Democratic Senatorial Campaign 
Committee, National Republican Congressional Committee, Republican 
National Committee, Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, and 
National Republican Senatorial Committee by Marc E. Elias, Esq., 
Jessica Furst, Esq., John Phillippe, Esq., Brian G. Svoboda, Esq., and 
Michael E. Toner, Esq.
Proposed Final Audit Report on Hillary Clinton for President (A08-05)
Withdrawal and Resubmission of Proposed Interpretative Rule Regarding 
Electronic Contributor Redesignations (LRA 820)
Legislative Recommendations
Management and Administrative Matters.

    Individuals who plan to attend and require special assistance, such 
as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, 
should contact Shawn Woodhead Werth, Commission Secretary and Clerk, at 
(202) 694-1040, at least 72 hours prior to the hearing date.

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Judith Ingram, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Shawn Woodhead Werth,
Secretary and Clerk of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-5846 Filed 3-9-11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
HOMELAND  STORES, INC.

			EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN

   			FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED 7/31/00



We respectfully request an extension of 15 days to file the
form 11-K for the aforementioned plan.
Our auditors, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, are in the final
stages of completing their audit of this plan which is
required before we file the 11-K. With the extension of
time, we should have no trouble completing our filing.

Thank you for your consideration.


Very turly your,


Wayne S. Peterson
Member of the Committee
---

---

EXHIBIT 15.1

CERTIFICATION

In
connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Robomatix Technologies Ltd. (the
Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Amit
Goldwasser, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, that to my knowledge:

| | 1. | I
have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of           Robomatix
Technologies Ltd.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the           Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 3. | the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material           respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company;
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 4. | Based
on my knowledge, this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report does not contain           any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact           necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which           such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by           the
Annual Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | /S/ AMIT GOLDWASSER
Amit GoldwasserChief Executive Officer
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------

July 5, 2005

A signed original of this written
statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



---

---
### §6807. Relation to State laws

#### (a) In general

This subchapter and the amendments made by this subchapter shall not be construed as superseding, altering, or affecting any statute, regulation, order, or interpretation in effect in any State, except to the extent that such statute, regulation, order, or interpretation is inconsistent with the provisions of this subchapter, and then only to the extent of the inconsistency.

#### (b) Greater protection under State law

For purposes of this section, a State statute, regulation, order, or interpretation is not inconsistent with the provisions of this subchapter if the protection such statute, regulation, order, or interpretation affords any person is greater than the protection provided under this subchapter and the amendments made by this subchapter, as determined by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, after consultation with the agency or authority with jurisdiction under section 6805(a) of this title of either the person that initiated the complaint or that is the subject of the complaint, on its own motion or upon the petition of any interested party.

(Pub. L. 106–102, title V, §507, Nov. 12, 1999, 113 Stat. 1442; Pub. L. 111–203, title X, §1093(6), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 2097.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subchapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this subtitle", meaning subtitle A (§§501–510) of title V of Pub. L. 106–102, Nov. 12, 1999, 113 Stat. 1436, which is classified principally to this subchapter. For complete classification of subtitle A to the Code, see Tables.

#### Amendments

2010—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 111–203 substituted "Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection" for "Federal Trade Commission".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2010 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 111–203 effective on the designated transfer date, see section 1100H of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as a note under section 552a of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
### §80a–55. Qualifications of directors

#### (a) Non-interested persons

A majority of a business development company's directors or general partners shall be persons who are not interested persons of such company.

#### (b) Vacancies; suspension of provisions

If, by reason of the death, disqualification, or bona fide resignation of any director or general partner, a business development company does not meet the requirements of subsection (a) of this section, or the requirements of section 80a–15(f)(1) of this title with respect to directors, the operation of such provisions shall be suspended for a period of 90 days or for such longer period as the Commission may prescribe, upon its own motion or by order upon application, as not inconsistent with the protection of investors.

(Aug. 22, 1940, ch. 686, title I, §56, as added Pub. L. 96–477, title I §105, Oct. 21, 1980, 94 Stat. 2280.)
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 651 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the age requirement 

with respect to eligibility for qualified ABLE programs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 5, 2019 

Mr. CASEY (for himself, Mr. MORAN, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, and Mr. ROBERTS) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

the age requirement with respect to eligibility for qualified ABLE programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘ABLE Age Adjust5 ment Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF AGE REQUIREMENT FOR QUALI7 FIED ABLE PROGRAMS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 529A(e) of the Internal 

9 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘age 26’’ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 651 IS

1 each place it appears in paragraphs (1)(A) and 

2 (2)(A)(i)(II) and inserting ‘‘age 46’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

4 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

5 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
#### § 4.23 Time for filing protest.

Thirty days after service thereof will be allowed to such licensee within which to file a protest to such reports. If no protest is filed within the time allowed, the Commission will issue such order as may be appropriate. If a protest is filed, a public hearing will be ordered in accordance with subpart E of part 385 of this chapter.

[Order 141, 12 FR 8485, Dec. 19, 1947, as amended by Order 225, 47 FR 19056, May 3, 1982]
#### § 73.4 Interstate shipment of exposed but not visibly diseased cattle from a quarantined or nonquarantined area; conditions under which permitted.

Cattle not visibly diseased with scabies, but which are known to be part of a diseased herd or to have come in contact with diseased cattle or infectious means of conveyance or premises, may be shipped interstate for any purpose if dipped at the point of origin, under the supervision of an APHIS inspector or State inspector, in a permitted dip, or the cattle may be dipped en route by special permission first had and obtained from the Administrator; but in such event the means of conveyance shall be placarded and the billing shall be marked “Cattle Exposed to Scabies,” in accordance with § 73.6, and the cattle shall not be permitted to mingle with other cattle until disposed of in accordance with the regulations in this part.

[28 FR 5945, June 13, 1963, as amended at 41 FR 5384, Feb. 6, 1976; 56 FR 52463, Oct. 21, 1991]
§ 590.956 Relabeling of imported egg products. ( a ) Egg products eligible for importation may be relabeled with an approved label under the supervision of an inspector at an official plant or official import inspection establishment. The new label for such product must indicate the country of origin, except for egg products that are processed (repasteurized or, in the case of dried product, dry blended with product produced in the United States) in an official plant.
( b ) The label for relabeled products must state the name, address, and zip code of the distributor, qualified by an appropriate term such as “packed for”, “distributed by”, or “distributors”.
#### Frank Van Arsdale *v.*Henry Rundel.

Measure op *damages—breach of contract to deliver goods.*On breach of contract to manufacture and deliver goods, the measure of damages is the loss sustained by reason of the non-delivery.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Madison county; the Hon. William H. Snyder, Judge, presiding.

This was an action brought by the appellee against the appellant, to recover damages for the breach of a contract to sell and deliver certain pottery ware. The plaintiff recovered judgment for $61.66, and costs.

Messrs. Gillespie & Happy, for the appellant.

Mr. E. Breese Glass, for the appellee.

Mr. Justice Breese

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This action was originally brought before a justice of the peace of Madison county, upon an account, claiming damages for the non-delivery of some pottery ware, which appellant, it was claimed, had contracted to deliver to appellee on a certain day, and at the price of seven cents per gallon. The contract is not disputed by appellant.

*64The only reason we can perceive, from the testimony, why the ware was not delivered as promised, seems to have been that appellant was apprehensive one Butterfield was to handle the ware for appellant, and to this person appellant had objections, on account of his failure to comply with contracts of a like nature made with appellant. But the proof shows this man Butterfield had no pecuniary interest in this contract whatever, and no personal connection with it.

The evidence shows that ware of the description specified in this contract, could not be purchased in market for less than ten cents per gallon. Appellee was, himself, a potter, and had orders for five thousand gallons, a part of which, about two thousand five hundred gallons, he was himself able to furnish, hence his contract with appellant to furnish the balance, to be delivered, at a specified time, on a car on the railroad track. Payment was to be made when appellee received the returns of the sale.

It is urged by appellant, that appellee is only entitled to nominal damages, by reason of his failure to comply with his contract.

We have examined the cases cited by appellant to sustain his view of this case, and do not think they conflict with the finding and judgment of the court. Hone of them conflict with the proposition on which this recovery is based, that on a breach of contract to deliver goods the measure of damages is the loss sustained by reason of the failure. In this case it is proved this ware was contracted to parties in Belleville and St. Louis, at ten and one-half cents per gallon. Here, appellee shows substantial damages, consisting in the difference between seven cents per gallon, which he was to pay appellant, and ten and one-half cents per gallon, which he was to receive from the parties to whom he had sold, and which was the market price.

The jury have found no more than this difference, and their verdict should not be disturbed. The judgment is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                            9373
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     3584
<ALLOWANCES>                                       210
<INVENTORY>                                       3979
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 19255
<PP&E>                                            5176
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1385
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   46694
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            13839
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      33478
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      (4128)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     46694
<SALES>                                          21073
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 21073
<CGS>                                             5376
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     5376
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 14890
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 175
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    875
<INCOME-TAX>                                        92
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                783
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       783
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>