alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> CT
<CIK> 0000913778
<NAME> BOSTON CAPITAL TAX CREDIT FUND IV L.P.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             456,501,585
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               456,501,585
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,604,150
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (22,081,504)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (17,477,354)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
# C_2012258EN.01000802.xml

| 25.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 258/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 258/8

---

Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 April 2012 — Deichmann SE v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(Case C-307/11 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 7(1)(b) - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Figurative sign representing a chevron edged with dotted lines)

2012/C 258/13

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Deichmann SE (represented by: O. Rauscher, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: K. Klüpfel, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 April 2011 in Case T-202/09 Deichmann SE v OHIM, by which the General Court dismissed the action for annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 April 2009 dismissing the appeal against the examiner’s decision, which refused registration of the figurative sign representing a chevron edged with dotted lines as a Community trade mark for certain goods in Classes 10 and 25 — Distinctive character of the mark

Deichmann SE

OHIM

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Deichmann SE shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Deichmann SE shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 269, 10.9.2011.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gouverneur Bancorp Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
F. Bennett, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by
                  the Report.


May 8, 2008                       By: /s/ Richard F. Bennett
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Richard F. Bennett
                                      President and Chief Executive Officer



         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code in accordance with Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall
not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be
deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act
of 1933 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.


                                       31
§ 281.302 Applicability. This subpart applies to— ( a ) Any essential agricultural use establishment for which an essential agricultural user: ( 1 ) Has requested that natural gas be classified as priority 2 entitlements by an interstate pipeline under § 281.207; and
( 2 ) Which has requested from any direct supplier priority 2 entitlements in excess of 300 Mcf per day; and
( b ) Any essential agricultural use establishment with a new boiler, other than a diesel engine or turbine designed to use distillate fuels as the only alternative to natural gas, that: ( 1 ) Has a capacity in excess of 300 Mcf of natural gas per day; and
( 2 ) Is put into service for the first time after August 29, 1979.
§ 7.7 Amendment of application. ( a ) Any proposed amendments to the pending license application after issuance of the notice of acceptance and ready for environmental analysis under this section must include: ( 1 ) An amended or new section 401 of the Clean Water Act water quality certification if the amendment would have a material adverse impact on the water quality in the discharge from the proposed project; and
( 2 ) Updates to all other material submitted under § 7.2(b).
( b ) If based on the information provided under paragraph (a) of this section, the proposed project under the amended license application no longer meets the requirements for expedited processing under § 7.2 of this part or if the proposed amendment significantly amends the license application, the Director will notify the applicant that the application will no longer be processed under the expedited licensing process under this part and that further processing of the application will proceed under parts 4 and 5 of this chapter, as applicable.
( c ) If the Director approves the continued processing of the amended application under this part and the amendment to the application would materially change the project's proposed plans of development, as provided in § 4.35 of this chapter, an agency, Indian Tribe, or member of the public may modify the recommendations or terms and conditions or prescriptions it previously submitted to the Commission pursuant to § 7.6. Such modified recommendations, terms and conditions, or prescriptions must be filed no later than the due date specified by the Commission for comments on the amendment.
( d ) *Date of acceptance.* The date of acceptance of an amendment of application for an original license filed under this part is governed by the provisions of § 4.35 of this chapter.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 23-40377

Summary Calendar

____________

Lisa Marie Searcy, 

Plaintiff—Appellant,

versus

Texas Attorney General Warren Kenneth Paxton, Jr.; 

Helen Truscott, Attorney; Jennifer Burnett, Attorney; Jana 

Wheeler, Attorney; Mark Aronowitz, Attorney; Et al., 

Defendants—Appellees.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:21-CV-113

______________________________

Before Wiener, Stewart, and Douglas, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Plaintiff-Appellant Lisa Marie Searcy has filed a pro se appeal from 

the dismissal of her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action and the denial of her mandamus 

petitions. Her arguments are purely conclusory, without the required

citations to authority and the record and with no explanation of how the 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 22, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 23-40377 Document: 00517039514 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/22/2024
No. 23-40377

2

district court erred. See Fed. R. App. P. 28(a)(8); Yohey v. Collins, 985 

F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, she has abandoned any challenge 

to the district court’s decision. See United States v. Scroggins, 599 F.3d 433, 

446 (5th Cir. 2010); Brinkmann v. Dallas Cnty. Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 

744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). 

AFFIRMED.

Case: 23-40377 Document: 00517039514 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/22/2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                          13,382
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  140,854
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,401
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               196,474
<PP&E>                                         758,699
<DEPRECIATION>                                 670,686
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 317,665
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          796,195
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                     3,485,412
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   317,665
<SALES>                                      1,352,871
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,352,871
<CGS>                                          356,919
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  356,919
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,446,924
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,005
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (463,817)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (463,817)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (463,817)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)
        

</TABLE>
### SUBCHAPTER II—GENERAL PROVISIONS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charles Robinson, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 750]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Daniel P FitzGerald, J.), rendered on or about March 22, 2005, unanimously affirmed.

*265No opinion. Order filed. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Marlow, Nardelli and Sweeny, JJ.
Exhibit


Exhibit 10.1


2016 Cash Bonus Plan


Eligible Employees: Executive Officers, Vice Presidents, Directors, Managers, and Individual


		
	•
	Bonus target payouts based on a percentage of base salary.




		
	•
	Payouts to CEO, CFO and CMO will be entirely based on achievement of corporate revenue, EBITDA, and free cash flow targets with 50% payable upon the achievement of certain minimum target levels, and 100% payable upon the achievement of certain maximum target levels.




		
	•
	Payouts to VP's are based 50% on the above corporate targets, and 50% based on management business objectives.




		
	•
	Payouts to Directors are based 30% on the above corporate targets, and 70% based on management business objectives.




		
	•
	Payouts to Managers are based 0% on the above corporate targets, and 100% based on management business objectives.




		
	•
	Payouts to Individuals are based 0% on the above corporate targets, and 100% based on management business objectives.




		
	•
	Maximum Bonus Amounts are as follows (expressed as a percentage of base salary):






    	
		
	CEO
	75%

	CMO
	50%

	CFO
	50%

	VPs
	25%

	Directors
	15%

	Managers
	10%

	Individual
	5%
#### § 4.24 Determination of cost.

The Commission, after receipt of the reports, or after the conclusion of the hearing if one is held, will determine the amounts to be included in the electric plant accounts of the licensee as the cost of the property and the accrued depreciation thereon.
# C_2012287EN.01001201.xml

| 22.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 12 July 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Riigikohus — Estonia) — AS Pimix, in liquidation v Maksu- ja Tolliameti Lõuna maksu- ja tollikeskus, Põllumajandusministeerium

(Case C-146/11) (1)

1

(Accession of new Member States - Setting the charge on surplus stocks of agricultural products - Reference, in a provision of national law, to a provision of a European Union regulation not duly published in the Official Journal of the European Union in the language of the Member State in question)

2012/C 287/19

Language of the case: Estonian

Referring court

Referring court

Riigikohus

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: AS Pimix, in liquidation

Applicant:

Defendants: Maksu- ja Tolliameti Lõuna maksu- ja tollikeskus, Põllumajandusministeerium

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Riigikohus — Interpretation of Articles 288(2) TFEU, 297(1) TFEU, Commission Regulation (EC) No 1972/2003 of 10 November 2003 on transitional measures to be adopted in respect of trade in agricultural products on account of the accession of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia (OJ 2003 L 293, p. 3) and the judgments of the Court of Justice in Cases C-161/06, C-560/07 and C-140/08 — Accession of new Member States — Setting the charge on surplus stocks of agricultural products — Reference, in a provision of national law, to a provision of a European Union regulation not duly published in the Official Journal of the European Union in the language of the Member State in question on the date prescribed for determination of the surplus stock — Whether regulation implemented within the meaning of the Court’s case-law

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 58 of the Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded must be interpreted as precluding, in Estonia, the application to individuals of provisions of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1972/2003 of 10 November 2003 on transitional measures to be adopted in respect of trade in agricultural products on account of the accession of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia, which, as at 1 May 2004, had neither been published in Estonian in the Official Journal of the European Union nor reproduced in the national law of that Member State, even though those individuals could have learned of those provisions by other means.

---

(1)  OJ C 160, 25.5.2011.

1

---
# C_2011173EN.01000701.xml

| 11.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 173/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 173/7

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Trani (Italy) lodged on 1 April 2011 — Cosimo Damiano Vino v Poste Italiane SpA

(Case C-161/11)

2011/C 173/13

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale di Trani

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Cosimo Damiano Vino

Applicant:

Defendant: Poste Italiane SpA

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| (a) | Does the general Community principle of non-discrimination and equality preclude national rules (such as that laid down by Article 2(1)a of Legislative Decree No 368/2001) which introduced into the national legal order an ‘acausal’ case that places at a disadvantage employees of Poste Italiane SpA, and, in relation to that company, other undertakings in the same sector or in other sectors? |
| --- | --- |

(a)

Does the general Community principle of non-discrimination and equality preclude national rules (such as that laid down by Article 2(1)a of Legislative Decree No 368/2001) which introduced into the national legal order an ‘acausal’ case that places at a disadvantage employees of Poste Italiane SpA, and, in relation to that company, other undertakings in the same sector or in other sectors?

| (b) | if the answer to the foregoing question is in the affirmative, is the national court required to disapply (or not to apply) the national rules which are contrary to Community law? |
| --- | --- |

(b)

if the answer to the foregoing question is in the affirmative, is the national court required to disapply (or not to apply) the national rules which are contrary to Community law?

---
###### Editorial Note on Part 12

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 12 appear at 69 FR 32438, June 10, 2004.

#### §§ 12.55-12.59 [Reserved]
Executive Order 13568

# Extending Provisions of the International Organizations Immunities Act to the Office of the High Representative in Bosnia and Herzegovina and the International Civilian Office in Kosovo

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act (59 Stat. 669, 22 U.S.C. 288), and the Extending Immunities to the Office of the High Representative in Bosnia and Herzegovina and the International Civilian Office in Kosovo Act of 2010 (Public Law 111-177, 124 Stat. 1260), it is hereby ordered that all privileges, exemptions, and immunities provided by the International Organizations Act be extended to the Office of the High Representative in Bosnia and Herzegovina and to its officers and employees, and to the International Civilian Office in Kosovo and to its officers and employees. In the event either the Office of the High Representative in Bosnia and Herzegovina or the International Civilian Office in Kosovo is dissolved, the privileges, exemptions, and immunities of that organization under the International Organizations and Immunities Act, as well as those of its officers and employees, shall continue to subsist.

This extension is not intended to abridge in any respect privileges, exemptions, or immunities that the Office of the High Representative in Bosnia and Herzegovina or the International Civilian Office in Kosovo, or the officers and employees thereof, otherwise may have acquired or may acquire by law.

[FR Doc. 2011-5903

Billing code 3195-W1-P
Exhibit 23.1









INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT









We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-93447) and Form S-3 (No. 333-45962) and in the related Prospectuses, of our report,
dated January 22, 2004, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Middleburg Financial
Corporation included in the 2003 Annual Report of Shareholders and incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.



/s/ Yount, Hyde & Barbour, P.C.



Winchester, Virginia

March 29, 2004
### §713d–3. Authorizations for appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated such amounts as may be necessary for purposes of carrying out the provisions of this joint resolution.

(Dec. 30, 1947, ch. 526, §9, 61 Stat. 948.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This joint resolution, referred to in text, means act Dec. 30, 1947, ch. 526, 61 Stat. 945. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 1919 of the former Appendix to Title 50, War and National Defense, prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.
### §325. Authority for certain functions and activities

Appropriations now or hereafter provided for the National Weather Service shall be available for (a) furnishing food and shelter, without repayment therefor, to employees of the Government assigned to Arctic stations; (b) equipment and maintenance of meteorological offices and stations, and maintenance and operation of meteorological facilities outside the United States by contract or otherwise; (c) repairing, altering, and improving of buildings occupied by the National Weather Service, and care and preservation of grounds, including the construction of necessary outbuildings and sidewalks on public streets abutting National Weather Service grounds; (d) arranging for communication services at rates to be fixed by the Secretary of Commerce by agreement with the companies performing the services when determined to be advantageous to the Government; and (e) purchasing tabulating cards and continuous form tabulating paper.

(June 2, 1948, ch. 373, §1, 62 Stat. 286; 1965 Reorg. Plan No. 2, 1970 eff. July 13, 1965, 30 F.R. 8819, 79 Stat. 1318; 1970 Reorg. Plan No. 4, eff. Oct. 3, 1970, 35 F.R. 15627, 84 Stat. 2090.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Cooperative Weather Observer Program

Pub. L. 102–567, title I, §101(c), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4270, provided that: "The Secretary of Commerce may use funds otherwise available for conducting weather observations to strengthen the Cooperative Weather Observer Program and encourage public participation in the program. The Secretary may—

"(1) provide distinctive insignia or paraphernalia to Cooperative Weather Observers; and

"(2) make awards of nominal value to recognize continued participation in the program by observers or to recognize outstanding achievements by such observers or groups of observers without regard to any law restricting expenditures for such purposes to Federal employees."

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Weather Bureau consolidated with Coast and Geodetic Survey to form new agency in Department of Commerce known as Environmental Science Services Administration by Reorg. Plan No. 2 of 1965, eff. July 13, 1965, 30 F.R. 8819, 79 Stat. 1318, set out as a note under section 311 of this title. Functions of Bureau and Chief of Bureau transferred to Secretary of Commerce by Reorg. Plan. Subsequently, Environmental Science Services Administration abolished and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration established. By Department Organization Order 25–5A, Secretary delegated to NOAA his functions under this chapter of the Code. By order of Acting Associate Administrator of NOAA, organizational name of Weather Bureau changed to National Weather Service. For further details, see Codification note set out under section 311 of this title.