alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BOBB Y BRIGHT " ZN O DisTniCT , ALABAM A

' r

. / 

# Congresf g o f tfj e WLnitt h ^tatt i Mou&t of ftcpresfcntatibefi Mafifjington , W>

€ 20515-010 2 Augus t 24 , 201 0 wKlT rfigs ' ARME D SERVICE S A m AN D Utfj D FONCE S TEnnonis M AN D UNCONVENTIONA L THREAT S A h o CAPASILIIIE S

REAOHES S AGRICULTUR E CONSERVATION , CREDIT . ENERGV . AN D

R E SEARC H RLJHA L OEVELOPMENT . HIOTICHHOLOGV , SRtciAtT Y CROPS , AN D RMEIC N

Aan i CULTUR E SMAL L BUSINES S

. RlGUlATlON l AN D HEAlTltCAR E

RURAl . 0£VELC#MENT , ENIRERHENEURSHIP . AN D TRAD E Th e Honorabl e RaymondH . LaHoo d Secretar y o f Transportatio n U.S . Departur

e o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jersey Ave. . S E Washington . D C 2059 0 Re : Smal l Communit y Ai r Servic e Developmen t

Gran t Applicatio n Dotban Regiona l Airpor t

- DUNS #04-06-4822 2 Dea r Honorabl e LaHood : r o > o C O r o . mJ-ir n O O Q 1 a mwritin g t

o expres s m

y utmos t suppor t fo r th e Smal l Communit

y Ai r Servic e Developmen

t Gran t applicatio n submitte db

y th e Dotha

n Regiona l Airport . Th e $750,00 0 gran t wil l fun dastartup phas e to establis h direc t servic e betwee

n Dotha n Regiona l Airpor t an dth e America n Airline s hu

b a t Dallas-For

t Wort h Airport . I t i s critica l tha t Dotha n Regiona l Airpor t customer s hav e acces s to th e Dallas-For t Wort h airport , a s i

t i s atop destinatio n fo

r busines s traveler s i

n th e wiregras s area . Providin g direc t acces s to Dallas-For

t Wort h Airpor t woul dimprov e th e abilit

y to attrac t

new businesses , increas e th e amoun t o f investmen t o f existin g businesse s an

dgrow th e econom

y o f southeas t Alabama . A s the U.S . Congressma

n fo r th e SecondCongressiona

l District , 1 a

mwell awar

e of th e benefits thi s progra

mwoul dbring to th e Dotha n Regiona l Airport . Thi s gran t

woul dpositively impac t the economi c well bein g of man y businesses , constituent s an dcommunitie s i

n th e sumjunding area . Therefore , I urg e you r ful l consideratio n o f

thi s proposa

l an dawai t afavorable response . Sincerely ,
Membe r of Congres s

1S 8 M FOSTE R STKET , Su m lO S DOTHAN . A L 3630 5 PHONE : IXH ) 794-KS O FAX : 1334 ) GT1-14S 0 1 2 MONno e STREET . SUIT C I B MONTUOUERY , A L 3610 4 PHOW : (334)277-911 3 FAX : 1334 1 i11~eS3 * IJ0 5 LONCvranri x HOUS E OFFIC E SunnN c WASHINGTON , D C 30S1 S PHONE : mi ) 225-Z90 1 FAX : (202 ) 225-691 3 PRINTI D O N RECYCLE D PAPE R
#### § 401.123 Waiver of rules.

The Commission may, for good cause shown, waive rules or require additional information in any case.
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**[****Richards,Layton, & Finger P.A.****letterhead]**

 
| February 24,  2009             |
|-------------------------------------|
|                                |
| Mr. Robert Kaiser              |
| Chief Executive Officer             |
| CLST Holdings, Inc.            |
| 17304 Preston Road,  Suite 420 |
| Dallas, Texas 75252                 |

 

***Re:******                            ******Manoj Rajegowda***

 

Dear Mr. Kaiser:

 

We have been retained to represent theinterests of Mr. Manoj Rajegowda and his firm, MC InvestmentPartners.  On Friday, February 18,2009, CLST Holdings (the “Company”) issued disclosure on Form 8-Kdisclosing what my clients believe was a material, related party transactionapproved by some group other than the full Board of Directors on or about February 13,2009.  My client was not informed of thistransaction and most strenuously objects to it. In particular, to the extent that this transaction was approved by theExecutive Committee of the Board without full Board approval or consultation(if it was approved by anyone at the Board level), my client believes that theCommittee was not disinterested in the transaction and that any approval by theCommittee was not sufficient to render the transaction less than an “interested”one.

 

My client continues to object to the failureof the Company to provide him with minutes of Board or Committee meetings, andnotes that, during his tenure as a director, the Company has not followed theordinary practice of presenting minutes to directors for comment and submittingthem to a vote.

 

In addition, given the broad shareholdersupport for a prompt liquidation of the Company, my client believes that theBoard’s attempts to continue the business of the Company in the face of theshareholders’ vote in favor of a prompt liquidation puts the interests of theBoard ahead of the interests of the shareholders.

 

In light of the fact that my client has beenisolated from any meaningful decision making role as a director, and in lightof the fact that the Company has determined to proceed in a manner which heconsiders antithetical to the expressed wishes of the majority of stockholders,he cannot, in good conscience, continue to serve as a director, and hasauthorized us to advise you in writing that he hereby tenders his resignationas a director, effective immediately.  Mr. Rajegowdaalso wishes to relinquish all option issuances provided to him during thecourse of his Board membership.  Pleasecancel those options.  He also requeststhat the Company cancel any unpaid compensation due to him for his service as adirector for the first quarter of this year.

 

Mr. Rajegowda and MC Investment Partnersreserve all of their rights in connection with the recently announcedtransaction, as well as what they consider to be an inappropriate course ofdealing by the Board.

 
|   | Very  truly yours,      |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   |                    |
|   | /s/  Gregory V. Varallo |
|   | Gregory  V. Varallo     |

 

cc:           JeffreyM. Sone, Esquire

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
EXHIBIT 27.1
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's February 28, 1998 Form 10-K and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000016918
<NAME> CANANDAIGUA BRANDS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                           1,232
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  142,615
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    394,028
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               564,338
<PP&E>                                         356,814
<DEPRECIATION>                                 112,779
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,073,159
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          283,334
<BONDS>                                        309,218
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           216
<OTHER-SE>                                     414,948
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,073,159
<SALES>                                      1,212,788
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,212,788
<CGS>                                          864,053
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  864,053
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,189
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 84,866
<INCOME-TAX>                                    34,795
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             50,071
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    50,071
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.62
        

</TABLE>
§ 77.22 Accredited-free States or zones. ( a ) The following are accredited-free States: None.
( b ) The following are accredited-free zones: None.
( c ) If an affected herd is detected in a State or zone classified as accredited-free, and the herd is depopulated and a complete epidemiologic investigation is completed within 120 days of the detection of the affected herd with no evidence of the spread of tuberculosis, the State or zone may retain its accredited-free status. If two or more affected herds are detected in an accredited-free State or zone within a 48-month period, the State or zone will be removed from the list of accredited-free States or zones and will be reclassified as modified accredited advanced.
( d ) If any livestock other than captive cervids are included in a newly assembled herd on a premises where a tuberculous herd has been depopulated, the State or zone must apply the herd test requirements contained in the “Uniform Methods and Rules—Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication” (January 22, 1999 edition), which is incorporated by reference at § 77.1, to those other livestock in the same manner as to captive cervids. Failure to do so will result in reclassification of the State or zone as modified accredited advanced.
( e ) If tuberculosis is diagnosed within an accredited-free State or zone in an animal not specifically regulated by this part and a risk assessment conducted by APHIS determines that the outbreak poses a tuberculosis risk to livestock within the State or zone, the State or zone must implement a tuberculosis management plan, approved jointly by the State animal health official and the Administrator, within 6 months of the diagnosis. The management plan must include provisions for immediate investigation of tuberculosis in animals held for exhibition and in livestock and wildlife; the prevention of the spread of the disease to other animals held for exhibition and to livestock and wildlife; increased surveillance for tuberculosis in animals held for exhibition and wildlife; eradication of tuberculosis from individual herds; a timeline for tuberculosis eradication; and performance standards by which to measure yearly progress toward eradication. If a State or zone does not implement such a plan within the required 6 months, the State or zone will lose its accredited-free status and will be reclassified as modified accredited advanced.
( f ) Accredited-free State or zone status must be renewed annually. To qualify for renewal of accredited-free State or zone status, a State must submit an annual report to APHIS certifying that the State or zone within the State complies with the provisions of the “Uniform Methods and Rules—Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication.” The report must be submitted to APHIS each year between October 1 and November 30.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0146)
§ 5.24 Applications not requiring a draft NEPA document. ( a ) If the Commission determines that a license application will be processed with an environmental assessment rather than an environmental impact statement and that a draft environmental assessment will not be required, the Commission will issue the environmental assessment for comment no later than 120 days from the date responses are due to the notice of acceptance and ready for environmental analysis.
( b ) Each environmental assessment issued pursuant to this paragraph must include draft license articles, a preliminary determination of consistency of each fish and wildlife agency recommendation made pursuant to Federal Power Act section 10(j) with the purposes and requirements of the Federal Power Act and other applicable law, as provided for in § 5.26, and any preliminary mandatory terms and conditions and fishway prescriptions.
( c ) Comments on an environmental assessment issued pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section, including comments in response to the Commission's preliminary determination with respect to fish and wildlife agency recommendations and on preliminary mandatory terms and conditions or fishway prescriptions, must be filed no later than 30 or 45 days after issuance of the environmental assessment, as specified in the notice accompanying issuance of the environmental assessment, as should any revisions to supporting documentation.
( d ) Modified mandatory prescriptions or terms and conditions must be filed no later than 60 days following the date for filing of comments provided for in paragraph (c) of this section, as specified in the notice accompanying issuance of the environmental analysis.
[Order 2002, 68 FR 51121, Aug. 25, 2003; 68 FR 61743, Oct. 30, 2003]
###### Editorial Note on Part 284

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 284 appear at 65 FR 10222, Feb. 25, 2000.

#### § 284.142 Sales by intrastate pipelines.

Any intrastate pipeline may, without prior Commission approval, sell natural gas to any interstate pipeline or any local distribution company served by an interstate pipeline. The rates charged by an intrastate pipeline pursuant to this subpart may not exceed the price for gas as negotiated in the contract, plus a fair and equitable transportation rate as determined in accordance with § 284.123.

[Order 581, 60 FR 53073, Oct. 11, 1995]
SAFETY OFFICER

SAFETY CHECKLIST

 SAFETY CLOTHING (VEST) AND HARD HAT

 CORDEN OFF AREA WITH SIGNAGE

 SET UP SIGNS AND DISPLAY TRIPODS

 CHECK FOR PERSONNEL AND OBSTRUCTIONS IN AREA

 ALERT PERSONNEL THEY MUST LEAVE THE AREA

 LOCATE AND FLAG OBSTRUCTIONS

 CHECK FIRE EXTINGUISHER AND MEDICAL KIT

 SET UP WORKING TABLE AND LANDING PAD

 CHECK BINOCULARS AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS

 SET UP GENERATOR, BATTERY CHARGERS & POWER UP

 GENERATOR

 COPTER BATTERY CHARGER

 VIDEO RECIEVER BATTERY CHARGER

 RC TRANSMITTER BATTERY CHARGER

 CAMERA BATTERY CHARGER

 WALKIE-TALKIE BATTERY CHARGER

 CHECK BATTERIES FOR CHARGE

 CHARGE BATTERIES THAT ARE LOW 

 COPTER LIPO BATTERIES

 VIDEO RECIEVER BATTERIES

 RC TRANSMITTER BATTERIES

 CAMERA BATTERIES

 WALKIE-TALKIE BATTERIES

 START-UP AND LIFT OFF CHECKLIST

 CHECK INSPECTION AREA FOR PERSONNEL OR 

WILDLIFE

 SAFETY OFFICER/SPOTTER READY CALL 

CONFIRMATION
PILOT/OPERATOR

SAFETY CHECKLIST

 SAFETY CLOTHING (VEST) AND HARD HAT

 COPTER CHECKLIST

 CHECK FOR ANY DAMAGE OR LOOSE WIRES 

 CHECK PROPS FOR DAMAGE AND REPAIR/REPLACE 

AS NEEDED

 RAISE ALL ATTENNAS 

 CHECK CAMERA GIMBAL MOVEMENT

 POWER UP CAMERA & CHECK SETTINGS 

 ATTACH LIPO BATTERY

 CHECK BALANCE WITH BATTERY ATTACHED

 ATTACH COPTER BATTERY LEADS

 RADIO AND VIDEO CHECKLIST

 POWER UP GROUND CONTROL STATION

 POWER UP RADIO AND FVP MONITOR

 CHECK VISUAL ON BOTH CAMERAS

 CHECK PROGRAMMING SCREEN DETAILS

 START-UP AND LIFT OFF CHECKLIST

 CHECK INSPECTION AREA FOR PERSONNEL OR 

WILDLIFE

 SAFETY OFFICER/SPOTTER READY CALL

 START-UP PROPS

 LIFT-OFF AND HOVER

 CHECK CONTROLS

 GPS MODE CHECK

 ALTITUDE UP/DOWN CHECK

 TURN RIGHT/LEFT CHECK

 LEFT/RIGHT CHECK

 FORWARD/REVERSE CHECK

 CAMERA OPERATION CHECK

 LIGHTS ON/OFF CHECK

 BEGIN INSPECTION/MAPPING/MONITORING
Administrative Office: 2700 “M” Street, Suite 302, Bakersfield, CA 93301-2370

Phone (661) 862-5250 – Fax (661) 862-5251

www.kernair.org – ekapcd@co.kern.ca.us

Public Notice

February 6, 2014

TO: Eastern Kern County

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

ON PROPOSED DRAFTS AND AMENDMENTS

TO RULES AND REGULATIONS

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN a public hearing will be held on March 13, 2014, 

1:00pm at Rosamond Community Services District, 3179 35TH Street West, Rosamond, 

CA. At the hearing Eastern Kern Air Pollution Control District (EKAPCD) Governing 

Board will consider adoption of the following:

Proposed Amendment to Rule 410.4 - Metal, Plastic, and Pleasure Craft Parts and 

Products Coating Operations

Proposed Amendment to Rule 410.4A - Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment 

Refinishing Operations

Proposed Draft Rule 410.8 - Aerospace Assembly and Coating Operations

Proposed Draft Rule 410.9 - Wood Products Surface Coating Operations

Proposed Draft Rule 432 - Polyester Resin Operations

A public workshop was held November 6, 2013. The California Air Resources Board 

(ARB) and the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) also reviewed the proposals. 

All comments have been considered and addressed in the final draft of each proposed 

rule’s respective staff report.

NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that if adopted, the rules will be submitted through 

ARB to EPA for incorporation as part of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). 

This action would constitute a SIP revision.

Interested persons may appear at the hearing and make oral comments. Written 

comments are invited for consideration and will be received until the close of business 

on March 7, 2014. Correspondence should be addressed to Glen E. Stephens, APCO, 

at EKAPCD, 2700 M St, Ste 302, Bakersfield, CA 93301, (661) 862-5250.

Copies of the proposed draft and amended rules and respective staff reports are 

available for review at the EKAPCD office located at 2700 M St, Ste 302, Bakersfield, 

CA 93301. You may also download a copy from the District’s website at 

www.kernair.org or call Debra at (661) 862-5250 and request a copy.

PUBLISHED: February 6, 2014
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



Aurizon Mines Ltd. (the “Company”) is filing with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, its annual report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2012 (the “Report”).

I, Ian S. Walton, Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes‐Oxley
Act of 2002:

| | (i) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Ian S. Walton	_____________	_________
Ian S. Walton
Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer

April 1, 2013



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Aurizon Mines Ltd. and will be retained by Aurizon Mines Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
### §6307f. Required disclosures for judges and referees

A judge or referee shall not be entitled to receive any compensation, directly or indirectly, in connection with a boxing match until it provides to the boxing commission responsible for regulating the match in a State a statement of all consideration, including reimbursement for expenses, that will be received from any source for participation in the match.

(Pub. L. 104–272, §14, as added Pub. L. 106–210, §4(2), May 26, 2000, 114 Stat. 325.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 14 of Pub. L. 104–272 was renumbered section 22 and is classified to section 6313 of this title.
### §9597. Executive Order 11625

The powers and duties of the Agency shall be determined—

(1) in accordance with this chapter and the requirements of this chapter; and

(2) without regard to Executive Order 11625 (36 Fed. Reg. 19967; relating to prescribing additional arrangements for developing and coordinating a national program for minority business enterprise).

(Pub. L. 117–58, div. K, title VII, §100707, Nov. 15, 2021, 135 Stat. 1467.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Executive Order 11625, referred to in section catchline and par. (2), is Ex. Ord. No. 11625, Oct. 13, 1971, 36 F.R. 19967, which is set out as a note under section 631 of this title.

This chapter, referred to in par. (1), was in the original "this division", meaning div. K of Pub. L. 117–58, Nov. 15, 2021, 135 Stat. 1445, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of division K to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 9501 of this title and Tables.
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATION**I, Richard A. Karp, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Catapult Communications Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparationof financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.     Date: February 11, 2008
### **CHAPTER 87—TELEMARKETING AND CONSUMER FRAUD AND ABUSE PREVENTION**

Sec.
6101.
Findings.
6102.
Telemarketing rules.
6103.
Actions by States.
6104.
Actions by private persons.
6105.
Administration and applicability of chapter.
6106.
Definitions.
6107.
Enforcement of orders.
6108.
Review.