alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 21.01LIST OF REGISTRANTS SUBSIDIARIES

|                                                  |  |                        
|------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                                                  |  | Country of Organization
|                                                  |  |                        
|Percentage Owned By
Macromedia, Inc.             
|                                                 
|                                                 
|                                                 
|                                                 
|Macromedia Ireland
(PTY) Ltd
100%                 |  | Ireland                
|                                                 
|                                                 
|                                                 
|                                                 
|Macromedia Canada, Ltd
100%                       |  | Canada                 
|                                                 
|                                                 
|                                                 
|                                                 
|shockwave.com, Inc.
66%                           |  | United States          
|                                                 
|                                                 
|                                                 
|                                                 
|Percentage Owned By
Macromedia Ireland (PTY) Ltd.
|                                                 
|                                                 
|                                                 
|                                                 
|Macromedia Netherlands B.V
100%                   |  | Netherlands            
|                                                 
|                                                 
|                                                 
|                                                 
|Macromedia Europe Limited
100%                    |  | United Kingdom         
|                                                 
|                                                 
|                                                 
|                                                 
|Macromedia KK
100%                                |  | Japan                  
|                                                 
|                                                 
|                                                 
|                                                 
|Percentage Owned By
shockwave.com, Inc.          
|                                                 
|                                                 
|                                                 
|                                                 
|shockwave.com International, Inc.
100%            |  | United States
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.38
                                       
                        EXTENSION OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

         THIS EXTENSION AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 26th day of 
October, 1998, by and between HARVEYS CASINO RESORTS, a Nevada corporation, 
hereinafter referred to as "Harveys", and GARY ARMENTROUT, hereinafter 
referred to as "Employee", as follows:

                             W I T N E S S E T H:

         WHEREAS, Harveys and Employee did, on the 9th day of May, 1995, 
entered into an Employment Agreement (the "Agreement"); and

         WHEREAS, Harveys and Employee did on the 23rd day of August, 1996, 
extend the term of employment for an additional one (1) year from May 8, 1997 
to and including May 8, 1998; and

         WHEREAS, Harveys and Employee did on the 9th day of September, 1997, 
extend the terms of employment for an additional one (1) year from May 8, 
1998 through and including May 8, 1999; and

         WHEREAS, Harveys and the Employee desire to extend the term of 
employment;

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and 
agreements herein contained and other good and valuable consideration, 
receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree to extend 
the term of employment of an additional one (1) year period, from May 8, 1999 
through and including May 8, 2000.

         Executed the day and year first above written.

                                   EMPLOYEE:

                                   /s/ Gary Armentrout
                                   -------------------------------------------
                                   Gary Armentrout

                                   EMPLOYER:

                                   HARVEYS CASINO RESORTS, a Nevada corporation

                                   By:    /s/ Charles W. Scharer
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          CHARLES W. SCHARER
                                          President/CEO
### §80b–8. General prohibitions

#### (a) Representations of sponsorship by United States or agency thereof

It shall be unlawful for any person registered under section 80b–3 of this title to represent or imply in any manner whatsoever that such person has been sponsored, recommended, or approved, or that his abilities or qualifications have in any respect been passed upon by the United States or any agency or any officer thereof.

#### (b) Statement of registration under Securities Exchange Act of 1934 provisions

No provision of subsection (a) shall be construed to prohibit a statement that a person is registered under this subchapter or under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.], if such statement is true in fact and if the effect of such registration is not misrepresented.

#### (c) Use of name "investment counsel" as descriptive of business

It shall be unlawful for any person registered under section 80b–3 of this title to represent that he is an investment counsel or to use the name "investment counsel" as descriptive of his business unless (1) his or its principal business consists of acting as investment adviser, and (2) a substantial part of his or its business consists of rendering investment supervisory services.

#### (d) Use of indirect means to do prohibited act

It shall be unlawful for any person indirectly, or through or by any other person, to do any act or thing which it would be unlawful for such person to do directly under the provisions of this subchapter or any rule or regulation thereunder.

(Aug. 22, 1940, ch. 686, title II, §208, 54 Stat. 853; Pub. L. 86–750, §§10, 11, Sept. 13, 1960, 74 Stat. 887.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Securities Exchange Act of 1934, referred to in subsec. (b), is act June 6, 1934, ch. 404, 48 Stat. 881, which is classified principally to chapter 2B (§78a et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 78a of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

1960—Pub. L. 86–750, §10, substituted "General prohibitions" for "Unlawful representations" in section catchline.

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 86–750, §11(a), authorized representation as an investment counsel if person's principal business consisted of acting as investment adviser, and a substantial part of the business was rendering investment supervisory services, and struck out the requirements that the person be primarily engaged in rendering investment supervisory services, or that his registration application state that the person is, or is about to become engaged primarily in rendering investment advisory services.

Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 86–750, §11(b), added subsec. (d).

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of Securities and Exchange Commission, with certain exceptions, to Chairman of such Commission, see Reorg. Plan No. 10 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3175, 64 Stat. 1265, set out under section 78d of this title.
Mr. Dennis M. McLerran, Regional Administrator 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10 

1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900 

Seattle, W A 981 0 I 

RE: SIP Revisions- Interstate Transport SIP Revisions for the 2006 Fine Particulate Matter, 

20 I 0 Nitrogen Dioxide, 2008 Ozone, and 2008 Lead National Ambient Air Quality 

Standards; and Revision to the BP Cherry Point Refinery BART Order in the Regional 

Haze SIP. 

Dear Mr. McLerran: 

The Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) prepared the following revisions to the 

State Implementation Plan (SIP): 

I. Interstate Transport SIP Revision for the 2006 Fine Particulate Matter National Ambient 

Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). 

2. Interstate Transport SIP Revision for the 20 I 0 Nitrogen Dioxide, 2008 Lead, and 2008 

Ozone NAAQS. 

3. Revised BART Order for BP Cherry Point Refmery in the Regional Haze SIP. 

As the Governor's designee for Washington's State Implementation Plan (SIP), I am submitting 

these revisions to the SIP. Ecology adopted the revisions effective May 8, 2015. 

Ecology evaluated Washington's air pollution contributions to areas of air quality concern in 

other states (interstate transport analysis) for the fine particulate matter (PM2.5), nitrogen dioxide 

(N02), lead (Pb), and ozone (03). The analysis fmds that Washington's sources do not 

significantly contribute to PM2.s, Pb, N02, and 03 air pollution in other states. No new rules are 

proposed. 

Separately, Ecology developed a revision to the Regional Haze SIP to include an updated Best 

Available Retrofit Teclmology (BART) Order issued to the BP Cherry Point Refinery. 

The refinery requested specific revisions to the emission limitations for two subject-to-BART 

emission units and additional minor changes. The net effect of the emission changes is a 

decrease of 10.4 tons ofNOx per year. Ecology held a mandatory 60-day consultation with the 

Federal Land Managers. We received no comments. 
The SIP submittal package is submitted electronically via EPA e-SIP Submission System at 

https://cdx.epa.gov/. 

If you have any questions on this submittal, please contact Anya Caudill at (360) 407-6630 or 

anya.caudill@ecy.wa.gov. 

Sincerely, 

Maia D. Bellon 

Director 

cc: Stu Clark, Ecology
### §205h. Compensation of Board members; travel expenses

Members of the Board who are not in the regular full-time employ of the United States shall, while attending meetings or conferences of the Board or while otherwise engaged in the business of the Board, be entitled to receive compensation at a rate not to exceed the daily rate currently being paid grade 18 of the General Schedule (under section 5332 of title 5), including traveltime. While so serving, on the business of the Board away from their homes or regular places of business, members of the Board may be allowed travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, as authorized by section 5703 of title 5, for persons employed intermittently in the Government service. Payments under this section shall not render members of the Board employees or officials of the United States for any purpose. Members of the Board who are in the employ of the United States shall be entitled to travel expenses when traveling on the business of the Board.

(Pub. L. 94–168, §9, Dec. 23, 1975, 89 Stat. 1011.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### References in Other Laws to GS–16, 17, or 18 Pay Rates

References in laws to the rates of pay for GS–16, 17, or 18, or to maximum rates of pay under the General Schedule, to be considered references to rates payable under specified sections of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, see section 529 [title I, §101(c)(1)] of Pub. L. 101–509, set out in a note under section 5376 of Title 5.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Financial Statements of The Smithfield Companies, Inc. for
the year ended March 31, 1997, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such Consolidated Financial Statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       6,660,759
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,612,383
<ALLOWANCES>                                    61,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,940,805
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,354,329
<PP&E>                                       6,651,308
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,137,314
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,908,655
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,599,077
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,007,611
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,301,967
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,908,655
<SALES>                                     19,481,357
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,568,458
<CGS>                                       12,999,407
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               18,518,212
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,592
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,331,016
<INCOME-TAX>                                   420,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            911,016
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   911,016
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .71
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.3



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of CellStar Corporation (the Registrant) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2005,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, in the capacity as indicated below and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Raymond L. DurhamRaymond L. Durham, Chief Financial OfficerDate: February 13, 2006
#### § 158.11 Report of certification.

Each natural gas company not classified as Class C or Class D prior to January 1, 1984 must file with the Commission by May 18 of the following calendar year, a letter or report of the independent accountant certifying approval, covering the subjects and in the format prescribed in the General Instructions of the applicable Form No. 2 or Form No. 2-A. The letter or report must also identify which, if any, of the examined schedules do not conform to the Commission's requirements and must describe the discrepancies that exist. The Commission will not be bound by the certification of compliance made by an independent accountant under this paragraph.

[Order 710, 73 FR 19399, Apr. 10, 2008]
p.1 

OAR Box 1384 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

165) ll-E-125 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:09 AM Sheet 165 of 264 
P.2 

JAN-23-98 FRI 4:4 7 PM 

01/29/98 16:32 

AN-COR PLASTICS 

©19199110234 

FAX NO. 

PES RTP NC 

From: 

Pate: 

Contact: 

Company: 

716 6950465 

A 94j7 n t t 

Contact Report 

Robert Jemison, Pacific Environmental Services, Inc. (PES) 

January 23,1998 

Mr. Merrill W. Arthur. P.E. 

P. 1 

0002/002 

An-Cor Industrial Plastics, Inc. 

Telephone Number: (716) 695-3141 

Fax Number: (716) 695-0465 

mmM 

EPA AIR DOCKET .. 

Contact Summary: 

Mr. Merrill W. Arthur was contacted to update infonnation provided in the 1993 EPA 

Reinforced Plastic/Composites Screening Survey submitted by An-Cor Industrial Plastics. Inc. for 

their facility located in North Tonawanda, New York. In response to my questions Mr. Arthur 

indicated the following: 

The facility makes exclusively corrosion resistant products for a variety of industries and 

applications. 

The facility uses the hand lay-up process (bucket and brush/non-pressure-fed roller) in the 

fabrication of certain products. The polyester resin applied by this fabrication process contains 

approximately 42% styrene by weight and does not contain a vapor suppressant. No additional 

styrene is added to the resin during the hand lay-up fabrication process. 

The facility uses two forms of mechanical resin application - airless mechanical spray and 

pressure-fed rollers - in the fabrication of certain products. The polyesteT resin applied by both 

fabrication processes contains approximately 42% styrene by weight and does not contain a vapor 

suppressant. No additional styrene is added to the resin during either the mechanical spray or 

pressure-fed roller fabrication process. For those products produced by mechanical resin application, 

both airless mechanical spray and pressure-fed rollers are used for approximately 50% of tbc 

production. In other words, both forms of mechanical resin application arc equally used. 

The facility uses the filament winding process in the fabrication of certain products. The 

polyester resin applied by ibis fabrication process contains approximately 42% styrene by weight 

and does not contain a vapor suppressant. No additional styrene is added to the resin during the 

filament winding fabrication process. 

The facility does not apply any gel coats in the fabrication of its products, 

INFORMATION IS ACCURATE
ex109.htm






Exhibit 10.9


Schedule of Board Fees












The Compensation Committee and Board of Directors of Lakeland Financial Corporation adopted the following fee schedule effective January 1, 2016:


 



	
Annual Director Retainer:

	  	
$

	
25,000

	  	  
	
Annual Audit Committee Chairman Retainer:

	  	
$

	
35,000

	  	  
	
Annual Lead Director and Governance Committee Chairman Retainer:

	  	
$

	
35,000

	  	  
	
Annual Compensation Committee Chairman Retainer:

	  	
$

	
30,000

	  	  
	
Annual Corporate Risk Committee Chairman Retainer

	  	
$

	
30,000

	  	  
	
Board Meeting Fee:

	  	
$

	
1,000

	  	
per meeting


	
Committee Meeting Fee:

	  	
$

	
1,000

	  	
per meeting


	
Annual stock grant:

	  	  	
1,250

	  	
shares
#### JT Queens Carwash, Inc., Respondent, v 88-16 Northern Blvd, LLC, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 349]

In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the plaintiff tenant is not in default of the subject lease, the defendant landlord appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Satterfield, J.), dated April 2, 2006, as, upon the plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction, extended a temporary restraining order of the same court dated February 14, 2006, in order for the plaintiff to *432properly effect service upon the defendant pursuant to CPLR 311-a.

Ordered that on the Court’s own motion, the appellant’s notice of appeal is treated as an application for leave to appeal, and leave to appeal is granted *(see*CPLR 5701 [a]); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly extended the temporary restraining order, which was initially issued before the expiration of the cure period set forth in the defendant landlord’s notice of default *(see Mann Theatres Corp. of Cal. v Mid-Island Shopping Plaza Co.,*94 AD2d 466 [1983], *affd*62 NY2d 930 [1984]; *SHS Baisley, LLC v Res Land, Inc.,*18 AD3d 727 [2005]; *Prince Lbr. Co. v CMC MIC Holding Co.,*253 AD2d 718 [1998]; *Wyndham Co. v Wyndham Hotel Co.,*236 AD2d 220 [1997]; *Fratto v Red Barn Farmers Mkt. Corp.,*144 AD2d 635 [1988]). Florio, J.P., Schmidt, Krausman and Lifson, JJ., concur.
### §78hh. Effective date

This chapter shall become effective on July 1, 1934, except that sections 78f and 78l(b to e) of this title shall become effective on September 1, 1934; and sections 78e, 78g, 78h, 78i(a)(6), 78j, 78k, 78l(a), 78m, 78n, 78o, 78p, 78q, 78r, 78s, and 78dd of this title shall become effective on October 1, 1934.

(June 6, 1934, ch. 404, title I, §34, 48 Stat. 905.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "This Act". See References in Text note set out under section 78a of this title.
# C_2011238EN.01000402.xml

| 13.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 238/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 238/4

---

Action brought on 17 May 2011 — European Commission v Italian Republic

(Case C-236/11)

2011/C 238/06

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by C. Soulay and D. Recchia, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Italian Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that, by applying the special scheme for travel agents even when the travel service is sold to someone other than the traveller, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 306-310 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC (1) of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by applying the special scheme for travel agents even when the travel service is sold to someone other than the traveller, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 306-310 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC (1) of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax;

1

| — | order the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Commission is of the view that the Italian Republic’s application of the special scheme for travel agents, inasmuch as it is not limited to services to travellers, as provided by the directive, but is extended to cover transactions between travel agencies too, is contrary to the provisions of the VAT legislation.

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.

1

---