13982 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 50 / Tuesday, March 15, 2011 / Notices 

assigned a probability of selection that 

is a function of its relative size within 

the stratum (payroll) and a stratumspecific reliability constraint. The larger 

establishments in a stratum may have 

probabilities equal to 1.00. Within each 

stratum, an independent sample will be 

selected. We will use a fixed sample 

size selection method for selecting the 

sample. This technique considerably 

improves the reliability of the resulting 

survey estimates by eliminating the 

variability associated with a variable 

sample size. The impact of the multiestablishment firms within each stratum 

will be taken into account in deriving 

the target sample size from the singleestablishment firm population. We 

estimate that the mail canvass for the 

2012 construction sector will include 

approximately 112,000 establishments 

of single-establishment firms. 

III. Data 

OMB Control Number: 0607–0935. 

Form Number: CC–23601, CC–23701, 

CC–23801–4. You can obtain 

information on the proposed content at 

this Web site: http://www.census.gov/ 

mcd/clearance. 

Type of Review: Regular submission. 

Affected Public: Businesses or other 

for profit, non-profit institutions or 

organizations, and State or Local 

Governments. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

130,000. 

Estimated Time per Response: 2.9 

hours. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden 

Hours: 377,000. 

Estimated Total Annual Cost: 

$12,222,340. 

Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory. 

Legal Authority: Title 13, United States 

Code, Sections 131 and 224. 

IV. Request for Comments 

Comments are invited on: (a) Whether 

the proposed collection of information 

is necessary for the proper performance 

of the functions of the agency, including 

whether the information shall have 

practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden 

(including hours and cost) of the 

proposed collection of information; (c) 

ways to enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and (d) ways to minimize the 

burden of the collection of information 

on respondents, including through the 

use of automated collection techniques 

or other forms of information 

technology. 

Comments submitted in response to 

this notice will be summarized and/or 

included in the request for OMB 

approval of this information collection; 

they also will become a matter of public 

record. 

Dated: March 10, 2011. 

Glenna Mickelson, 

Management Analyst, Office of the Chief 

Information Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2011–5981 Filed 3–14–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–07–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–583–841] 

Antidumping Duty Order: Polyvinyl 

Alcohol From Taiwan 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: Based on affirmative final 

determinations by the Department of 

Commerce (the Department) and the 

International Trade Commission (ITC), 

the Department is issuing an 

antidumping duty order on polyvinyl 

alcohol (PVA) from Taiwan. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 15, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Thomas Schauer at (202) 482–0410, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office 5, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On February 1, 2011, the Department 

published its affirmative final 

determination of sales at less than fair 

value in the antidumping duty 

investigation of PVA from Taiwan. See 

Polyvinyl Alcohol From Taiwan: Final 

Determination of Sales at Less Than 

Fair Value, 76 FR 5562 (February 1, 

2011). 

On March 9, 2011, the ITC notified 

the Department of its final 

determination, pursuant to section 

735(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act), that an industry in 

the United States is materially injured 

by reason of less-than-fair-value imports 

of PVA from Taiwan within the 

meaning of section 735(b)(1)(A)(i) of the 

Act. See Polyvinyl Alcohol from Taiwan 

(Investigation No. 731–TA–1088 (Final), 

USITC Publication 4218, March 2011). 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by this 

antidumping duty order is PVA. This 

product consists of all PVA hydrolyzed 

in excess of 80 percent, whether or not 

mixed or diluted with commercial 

levels of defoamer or boric acid. PVA in 

fiber form and PVB-grade low-ash PVA 

are not included in the scope of this 

order. PVB-grade low-ash PVA is 

defined to be PVA that meets the 

following specifications: Hydrolysis, 

Mole % of 98.40 +/¥ 0.40, 4% Solution 

Viscosity 30.00 +/¥ 2.50 centipois, and 

ash—ISE, wt% less than 0.60, 4% 

solution color 20mm cell, 10.0 

maximum APHA units, haze index, 

20mm cell, 5.0, maximum. The 

merchandise subject to this order is 

currently classifiable under subheading 

3905.30.00 of the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). 

Although the HTSUS subheading is 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, the written description of the 

merchandise subject to this order is 

dispositive. 

Provisional Measures 

Section 733(d) of the Act states that 

suspension-of-liquidation instructions 

issued pursuant to an affirmative 

preliminary determination may not 

remain in effect for more than four 

months except where exporters 

representing a significant proportion of 

exports of the subject merchandise 

request the Department to extend that 

four-month period to no more than six 

months. At the request of the exporter 

that accounted for a significant 

proportion of exports of the subject 

merchandise in the investigations of 

PVA from Taiwan, we extended the 

four-month period to no more than six 

months. See Polyvinyl Alcohol From 

Taiwan: Preliminary Determination of 

Sales at Less Than Fair Value and 

Postponement of Final Determination, 

75 FR 55552 (September 13, 2010) 

(Preliminary Results). 

In the investigation, the six-month 

period beginning on the date of the 

publication of the preliminary 

determination (i.e., September 13, 2010) 

will end on March 12, 2011. 

Furthermore, section 737 of the Act 

states that definitive duties are to begin 

on the date of publication of the ITC’s 

final injury determination. Therefore, in 

accordance with section 733(d) of the 

Act, we will instruct U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) to terminate the 

suspension of liquidation and to 

liquidate, without regard to 

antidumping duties, unliquidated 

entries of PVA from Taiwan entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption after March 12, 2011, 

through the day preceding the date of 

publication of the ITC’s final injury 

determination in the Federal Register. 

Suspension of liquidation will resume 

for entries entered, or withdrawn from 

warehouse, for consumption on or after 

the date of publication of the ITC’s final 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 50 / Tuesday, March 15, 2011 / Notices 13983 

injury determination in the Federal 

Register. 

Antidumping Duty Order 

On March 9, 2011, in accordance with 

section 735(d) of the Act, the ITC 

notified the Department of its final 

determination that an industry in the 

United States is materially injured 

within the meaning of section 

735(b)(1)(A)(i) of the Act by reason of 

less-than-fair-value imports of PVA from 

Taiwan. 

In accordance with section 736(a)(1) 

of the Act, the Department will direct 

CBP to assess, upon further instruction 

by the Department, antidumping duties 

equal to the amount by which the 

normal value of the merchandise 

exceeds U.S. price of the merchandise 

for all relevant entries of PVA from 

Taiwan. These antidumping duties will 

be assessed on all unliquidated entries 

of PVA from Taiwan entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after September 13, 

2010, the date on which the Department 

published its notice of preliminary 

determination in the Federal Register, 

excluding those entries entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption between March 13, 2011 

(the day following the end of the 

provisional-measures period), and the 

day preceding the publication date of 

the ITC’s final injury determination in 

the Federal Register. See Preliminary 

Results, 75 FR at 55552. 

Effective on the date of publication of 

the ITC’s notice of final determination 

in the Federal Register, CBP will 

require, pursuant to section 736(a)(3) of 

the Act and at the same time as 

importers would normally deposit 

estimated duties on subject 

merchandise, a cash deposit equal to the 

estimated weighted-average 

antidumping margins listed below. 

Upon further instruction by the 

Department and in accordance with 

section 736(a)(1) of the Act, the 

Department will instruct CBP to assess 

antidumping duties equal to the amount 

by which the normal value of the 

merchandise exceeds U.S. price of the 

merchandise for all relevant entries of 

PVA from Taiwan. These antidumping 

duties will be assessed on all 

unliquidated entries of PVA entered 

from Taiwan, or withdrawn from 

warehouse, for consumption on or after 

the date of publication of the ITC’s 

notice of final determination in the 

Federal Register. 

Producer or exporter 

Weightedaverage 

margin 

Chang Chun Petrochemical 

Co., Ltd ................................. 3.08 

All Others .................................. 3.08 

This notice constitutes the 

antidumping duty order with respect to 

PVA from Taiwan pursuant to section 

736(a) of the Act. Interested parties may 

contact the Central Records Unit of the 

main Department of Commerce 

building, Room 7046, for copies of an 

updated list of antidumping duty orders 

currently in effect. 

This order is published in accordance 

with section 736(a) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.211(b). 

Dated: March 9, 2011. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2011–6004 Filed 3–14–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–831] 

Fresh Garlic from the People’s 

Republic of China: Court Decision Not 

in Harmony With Final Results and 

Amended Final Results of Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On March 1, 2011, the United 

States Court of International Trade 

(‘‘CIT’’) sustained in an unpublished 

judgment the Department of 

Commerce’s (‘‘the Department’’) final 

results of redetermination as applied to 

respondent Shenzhen Greening Trading 

Co., Ltd. (‘‘Greening’’) pursuant to the 

CIT’s order granting the Department’s 

voluntary remand request in Shandong 

Chenhe International Trading Co., Ltd. 

and Shenzhen Greening Trading Co., 

Ltd. v. United States, Court No. 09– 

00246 (Ct. Int’l Trade April 22, 2010). 

See Final Results of Redetermination 

Pursuant to Voluntary Remand, Court 

No. 09–00246, dated July 30, 2010, 

available at http://ia.ita.doc.gov/ 

remands (‘‘Remand Results’’); Shandong 

Chenhe International Trading Co., Ltd. 

and Shenzhen Greening Trading Co., 

Ltd. v. United States, Court No. 09– 

00246 (Ct. Int’l Trade March 1, 2011) 

(‘‘Judgment’’). Consistent with the 

decision of the United States Court of 

Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

(‘‘CAFC’’) in Timken Co. v. United 

States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir. 1990) 

(‘‘Timken’’), as clarified by Diamond 

Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. United 

States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) 

(‘‘Diamond Sawblades’’), the Department 

is notifying the public that the final 

judgment in this case is not in harmony 

with the Department’s final results and 

is amending the final results of the 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on fresh garlic 

from the People’s Republic of China 

(‘‘PRC’’) covering the period of review 

(‘‘POR’’) of November 1, 2006, through 

October 31, 2007 with respect to 

Greening. See Fresh Garlic From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results and Partial Rescission of the 

13th Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and New Shipper Reviews, 74 

FR 29174 (June 19, 2009) (‘‘Final 

Results’’), and accompanying Issues and 

Decision Memorandum at Comment 11. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 11, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Scott Lindsay or David Lindgren, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office 6, Import 

Administration—International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC, 20230; 

telephone (202) 482–0780 or (202) 482– 

3870. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On June 19, 2009, the Department 

issued its Final Results, where it 

determined that neither Shandong 

Chenhe International Trading Co., Ltd. 

(‘‘Chenhe’’) nor Greening submitted a 

separate rate application or certification, 

and neither company informed the 

Department that they had no shipments 

of subject merchandise during the POR 

within the deadlines provided in the 

separate rate applications and 

certifications. See Final Results and 

accompanying Issues and Decision 

Memorandum at Comment 11. 

Accordingly, for the six months of the 

POR not covered by the concurrently 

conducted new shipper review (‘‘NSR’’), 

we determined that Chenhe and 

Greening had not established that they 

were each entitled to a separate rate, 

and without timely filed no-shipment 

certifications, Chenhe and Greening 

should be deemed to be part of the PRCwide entity. Id. See also Fresh Garlic 

from the People’s Republic of China: 

Initiation of Antidumping Duty New 

Shipper Reviews, 72 FR 38057 (July 12, 

2007). 

Chenhe and Greening timely 

challenged the Department’s 

determination not to rescind the 

administrative review with respect to 

both companies to the CIT. On April 22, 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES