alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 375.301 Purpose and subdelegations. ( a ) The purpose of this subpart is to set forth the authorities that the Commission has delegated to staff officials. Any action by a staff official under the authority of this subpart may be appealed to the Commission in accordance with § 385.1902 of this chapter.
( b ) Where the Commission, in delegating functions to specified Commission officials, permits an official to further delegate those functions to a designee of such official, *designee* shall mean the deputy of such official, the head of a division, or a comparable official as designated by the official to whom the direct delegation is made.
( c ) For purposes of Subpart C, *uncontested* and *in uncontested cases* mean that no motion to intervene, or notice of intervention, in opposition to the pending matter made under § 385.214 (intervention) has been received by the Commission.
[Order 112, 45 FR 79025, Nov. 28, 1980, as amended by Order 225, 47 FR 19058, May 3, 1982; Order 492, 53 FR 16062, May 5, 1988]
§ 77.30 Nonaccredited States or zones. ( a ) The following are nonaccredited States: None.
( b ) The following are nonaccredited zones: None.
( c ) To qualify for accreditation preparatory status, a nonaccredited State or zone must demonstrate to the Administrator that it complies with the provisions of the “Uniform Methods and Rules—Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication” and that tuberculosis is prevalent in less than 0.5 percent of the total number of herds of captive cervids in the State or zone.
# C_2013344EN.01001101.xml

| 23.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 344/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 344/11

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — CHS Tour Services GmbH v Team4 Travel GmbH

(Case C-435/11) (1)

1

(Directive 2005/29/EC - Unfair commercial practices - Sales brochure containing false information - Treated as ‘misleading commercial practice’ - Case in which the trader cannot be criticised for any breach of the duty of diligence)

2013/C 344/16

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: CHS Tour Services GmbH

Appellant:

Respondent: Team4 Travel GmbH

Respondent:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Oberster Gerichtshof — Interpretation of Article 5 of Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market and amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC, Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2005 L 149, p. 22) — Brochure containing false information — Whether or not possible for a trader to show that the requirements of professional diligence have been complied with in order to prevent a commercial practice from being categorised as ‘unfair’

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market and amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC, Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (‘Unfair Commercial Practices Directive’), must be interpreted as meaning that, if a commercial practice satisfies all the criteria specified in Article 6(1) of that directive for being categorised as a misleading practice in relation to the consumer, it is not necessary to determine whether such a practice is also contrary to the requirements of professional diligence as referred to in Article 5(2)(a) of the directive in order for it legitimately to be regarded as unfair and, therefore, prohibited in accordance with Article 5(1) of the directive.

---

(1)  OJ C 340, 19.11.2011.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME FILED AS PART
OF THE ANNUAL 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                             154
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,422
<ALLOWANCES>                                       743
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,617
<PP&E>                                          55,276
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,797
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  66,548
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,544
<BONDS>                                         26,278
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            62
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,025
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    66,548
<SALES>                                         52,387
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                52,387
<CGS>                                           27,682
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,682
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    57
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   114
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,273
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    268
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,016
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (748)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (748)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.12)
        

</TABLE>
P. 1 

# OAR Box 1147 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 15DIV-E-2 4 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 4/22/20082:42:55PM

Sheet 151 of 242P. 2
UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA LPROTECTIO N AGENC Y

AN N ARBOR , MICHIGA N 4810 5 

### FE B 

### 9 198

8 OFFIC E O F AI R AN O RADIATIO N

MEMORANDU M SUBJECT : Meetin g wit hMitsubish i Chemica l Regardin g Onboar d

Proposa l FROM : 

### TO : Kathlee nA . Steilen , Chemica l Enginee r ^"KP-^^JLLS.••> \ (• ? x^t2
- Standard s Developmen t and Suppor t Branc h Docke t A-87-1 1 

### n

THRU : Glen nW . Passavant , Senio r Projec t Manage r VZJ.^ W V > 0 \aj i/U ^ rr ^\ Standard s Developmen t and Support * .Branch Cheste r J . France , Chie f Standard s Developmen t an^Sup , anc h O nFebruar y3 , 1988 , I me t wit hKe nVo nHertsenber g and Goich i Okub o o f Mitsubish i Internationa l Corporatio nan d Akir a Iked a o f Mitsubish i Chemica l Industrie s Limite d a t EPA' s Moto r Vehicl e Emissio nLaborator yi n AnnArbo r regardin g EPA' s refuelin g proposal . Mitsubish i Chemica l i s a nactivate d carbo n supplie r t o moto r vehicl e manufacturer s i nJapan . At thi s meeting , w e discusse d the onboar d proposa l and I answere d an y o f thei r relate d questions . I n addition , w e discusse d th e subjec t o f carbo navailability . The yha d receive d a lette r fro mEP Aaskin g the mt o respon d t o som e concern s fro m Congressma nDingel l pertainin g t o th e carbo navailabilit yfo r refuelin g controls . The yfel t tha t i f moto r vehicl e manufacturer s require d thei r highes t qualit yactivate d carbo n fo r refuelin g control s (i.e. , simila r t o tha t no wdemande d by th e Japanes e manufacturer s fo r evaporativ e systems) , the nth e availabilit yo f thi s carbo n coul d b e a proble mwit honl ytw o year s leadtime . The ywer e plannin g t o addres s thes e concern s i nmor e detai l i ntheir^**esponse,ritp^£pj)g.ressma n Dingell . ]Q- S. i 

### 831

•j'3 } .
MEMORANDUM

TO: Record

FROM: Lisa Biddle, U.S. EPA

DATE: March 31, 2015

SUBJECT: Information from EPA Region 3 about Treatment Facilities in Pennsylvania

(DCN SGE01003)

In March 2014, EPA Office of Water (EPA OW) communicated with EPA Region 3

regarding the status of oil and gas extraction wastewater that may be treated at centralized waste 

treatment (CWT) facilities and publicly owned treatment works (POTWs) in Pennsylvania. This 

memorandum contains a summary of that information.

Eureka CWT

EPA Region 3 confirmed that the Eureka CWT was still discharging to the Williamsport POTW,

including treated wastewater from hydraulic fracturing operations. Eureka was also planning a 

second oil and gas treatment facility in the Williamsport area that would also discharge to one of 

the Williamsport municipal treatment plants. For Williamsport the Region 3 local limits database 

showed the last evaluation as 2006, which likely did not include oil and gas pollutants. Based on 

a more recent discussions with the POTW, it was EPA Region 3’s understanding that the POTW 

was applying PADEP’s new source standards (e.g., 500 milligrams per liter total dissolved 

solids) at the that time (March 2014).

Advanced Waste Services CWT

EPA Region 3 explained that their understanding was that Advanced Waste Services was not 

currently accepting oil and gas wastewater, but since New Castle (the POTW that Advanced 

Waste Services discharges to) was pursuing local limits for oil and gas pollutants, it was likely

that New Castle would like to authorize the discharge at some point. The 2012 annual 

pretreatment report showed New Castle as not currently accepting oil and gas wastewater.

Region 3 also pointed out that that New Castle had made a local limits submission that included

a literature search for levels of total dissolved solids and chlorides that inhibit activate sludge 

treatment systems. EPA Region 3 reviewed and commented on the submission.

Dan-Pun CWT

EPA Region 3 identified Dan-Pun, which is a CWT that treats oil and gas wastewater that 

discharges to the Punxsutawney POTW. However Dan-Pun was not accepting wastes from 

unconventional oil and gas extraction operations, but did accept conventional oil and gas wastes. 

Additional information about the treatment at Dan-Pun was not available. Punxsutawney also 

submitted a local limits evaluation in 2008 and their recent permit included a requirement to redo 

the limit analysis (due 6/12/14).
Memorandum

March 31, 2015

Page 2

Ridgeway POTW

EPA Region 3’s summary of annual report data for 2012 showed Ridgway POTW as accepting 

oil and gas extraction waste. Based on the Region 3 local limits database, Ridgway submitted a 

reevaluation in January 2014.
# C_2011173EN.01000801.xml

| 11.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 173/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 173/8

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Frosinone (Italy) lodged on 7 April 2011 — Criminal proceedings against Patrick Conteh

(Case C-169/11)

2011/C 173/16

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale di Frosinone

Party to the main proceedings

Party to the main proceedings

Patrick Conteh

Question referred

Question referred

Are Articles 15 and 16 of Directive 2008/115/EC (1) to be interpreted as precluding a Member State from applying to an illegally staying third country national who does not cooperate in the administrative return procedure measures involving deprivation of liberty, on the basis of measures which are other than detention measures and as defined by national law, without the pre-conditions and safeguards laid down in Articles 15 and 16 of Directive 2008/115, on grounds of failure to comply with a removal order issued by the competent administrative authority in accordance with Article 8(3) of that directive?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2008 L 348, p. 98.

1

---
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 803 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore incentives for 

investments in qualified improvement property. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 14, 2019 

Mr. TOOMEY (for himself, Mr. JONES, Mr. KING, Mr. MANCHIN, Mr. 

PORTMAN, Mr. ROBERTS, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Mr. THUNE, Ms. SINEMA, and 

Ms. MCSALLY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore 

incentives for investments in qualified improvement property. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Restoring Investment 

5 in Improvements Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS REGARDING QUALIFIED 

7 IMPROVEMENT PROPERTY. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 168 of the Internal Rev9 enue Code of 1986 is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 803 IS

1 (1) in subsection (e)— 

2 (A) in paragraph (3)(E), by striking ‘‘and’’ 

3 at the end of clause (v), by striking the period 

4 at the end of clause (vi) and inserting ‘‘, and’’, 

5 and by adding at the end the following new 

6 clause: 

7 ‘‘(vii) any qualified improvement prop8 erty.’’, and 

9 (B) in paragraph (6)(A), by inserting 

10 ‘‘made by the taxpayer’’ after ‘‘any improve11 ment’’, and 

12 (2) in the table contained in subsection 

13 (g)(3)(B)— 

14 (A) by striking the item relating to sub15 paragraph (D)(v), and 

16 (B) by inserting after the item relating to 

17 subparagraph (E)(vi) the following new item: 

‘‘(E)(vii) ....................................................................................... 20’’. 

18 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

19 this section shall take effect as if included in section 

20 13204 of Public Law 115–97. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
# C_2010246EN.01001701.xml

| 11.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/17

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 27 May 2010 — Döhler Neuenkirchen GmbH v Hauptzollamt Oldenburg

(Case C-262/10)

()

2010/C 246/29

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Döhler Neuenkirchen GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Oldenburg

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Is Article 204(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code (1) to be interpreted as meaning that it also applies to non-fulfilment of those obligations which are to be fulfilled only after discharge of the relevant customs procedure which has been used, so that where goods imported under an inward processing procedure in the form of a system of suspension have been partly re-exported within the time-limit the failure to fulfil the obligation to supply the bill of discharge to the supervising office within 30 days of the expiry of the time-limit for discharging the procedure gives rise to a customs debt in respect of the entire quantity of the imported goods covered by the bill of discharge if the requirements of Article 859(9) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 (2) establishing the Community Customs Code, as amended by Article 1(30)(b) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 993/2001 of 4 May 2001 (3) are not fulfilled?

1

2

3

---

(1)  OJ 1992 L 302, p. 1.

1

(2)  Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code; OJ 1993 L 253, p. 1.

2

(3)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 993/2001 of 4 May 2001 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code; OJ 2001 L 141, p. 1.

3

---
### §8514. Hurricane forecast improvement program

#### (a) In general

The Under Secretary, in collaboration with the United States weather industry and such academic entities as the Administrator considers appropriate, shall maintain a project to improve hurricane forecasting.

#### (b) Goal

The goal of the project maintained under subsection (a) shall be to develop and extend accurate hurricane forecasts and warnings in order to reduce loss of life, injury, and damage to the economy, with a focus on—

(1) improving the prediction of rapid intensification and track of hurricanes;

(2) improving the forecast and communication of storm surges from hurricanes;

(3) incorporating risk communication research to create more effective watch and warning products; and

(4) evaluating and incorporating, as appropriate, innovative observations, including acoustic or infrasonic measurements.

#### (c) Project plan

Not later than 1 year after April 18, 2017, the Under Secretary, acting through the Assistant Administrator for Oceanic and Atmospheric Research and in consultation with the Director of the National Weather Service, shall develop a plan for the project maintained under subsection (a) that details the specific research, development, and technology transfer activities, as well as corresponding resources and timelines, necessary to achieve the goal set forth in subsection (b).

(Pub. L. 115–25, title I, §104, Apr. 18, 2017, 131 Stat. 94; Pub. L. 117–316, §9, Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4412.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2022—Subsec. (b)(4). Pub. L. 117–316 added par. (4).
#### § 4.400 Applicability and purpose.

This part implements section 30(a) of the Federal Power Act, as amended, and provides procedures for obtaining a determination from the Commission that the facility to be constructed is a qualifying conduit hydropower facility, as defined in § 4.30(b)(26), and thus, is not required to be licensed under Part I of the FPA.

[Order 800, 79 FR 59111, Oct. 1, 2014, as amended by Order 857, 84 FR 7991, Mar. 6, 2019]
### §48. Information and assistance from departments

The several departments and bureaus of the Government when directed by the President shall furnish the Commission, upon its request, all records, papers, and information in their possession relating to any corporation subject to any of the provisions of this subchapter, and shall detail from time to time such officials and employees to the Commission as he may direct.

(Sept. 26, 1914, ch. 311, §8, 38 Stat. 722.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of Federal Trade Commission, with certain exceptions, to Chairman of such Commission, see Reorg. Plan No. 8 of 1950, §1, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3175, 64 Stat. 1264, set out under section 41 of this title.
### §2807. Prohibition on restriction of installation of renewable fuel pumps

#### (a) Definition

In this section:

#### (1) Renewable fuel

The term "renewable fuel" means any fuel—

(A) at least 85 percent of the volume of which consists of ethanol; or

(B) any mixture of biodiesel and diesel or renewable diesel (as defined in regulations adopted pursuant to section 7545(o) of title 42 (40 CFR, part 80)), determined without regard to any use of kerosene and containing at least 20 percent biodiesel or renewable diesel.

#### (2) Franchise-related document

The term "franchise-related document" means—

(A) a franchise under this chapter; and

(B) any other contract or directive of a franchisor relating to terms or conditions of the sale of fuel by a franchisee.

#### (b) Prohibitions

#### (1) In general

No franchise-related document entered into or renewed on or after December 19, 2007, shall contain any provision allowing a franchisor to restrict the franchisee or any affiliate of the franchisee from—

(A) installing on the marketing premises of the franchisee a renewable fuel pump or tank, except that the franchisee's franchisor may restrict the installation of a tank on leased marketing premises of such franchisor;

(B) converting an existing tank or pump on the marketing premises of the franchisee for renewable fuel use, so long as such tank or pump and the piping connecting them are either warranted by the manufacturer or certified by a recognized standards setting organization to be suitable for use with such renewable fuel;

(C) advertising (including through the use of signage) the sale of any renewable fuel;

(D) selling renewable fuel in any specified area on the marketing premises of the franchisee (including any area in which a name or logo of a franchisor or any other entity appears);

(E) purchasing renewable fuel from sources other than the franchisor if the franchisor does not offer its own renewable fuel for sale by the franchisee;

(F) listing renewable fuel availability or prices, including on service station signs, fuel dispensers, or light poles; or

(G) allowing for payment of renewable fuel with a credit card,

so long as such activities described in subparagraphs (A) through (G) do not constitute mislabeling, misbranding, willful adulteration, or other trademark violations by the franchisee.

#### (2) Effect of provision

Nothing in this section shall be construed to preclude a franchisor from requiring the franchisee to obtain reasonable indemnification and insurance policies.

#### (c) Exception to 3-grade requirement

No franchise-related document that requires that 3 grades of gasoline be sold by the applicable franchisee shall prevent the franchisee from selling a renewable fuel in lieu of 1, and only 1, grade of gasoline.

(Pub. L. 95–297, title I, §107, as added Pub. L. 110–140, title II, §241(a), Dec. 19, 2007, 121 Stat. 1538.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the date that is 1 day after Dec. 19, 2007, see section 1601 of Pub. L. 110–140, set out as a note under section 1824 of Title 2, The Congress.
Editorial Note on Part 284
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 284 appear at 65 FR 10222, Feb. 25, 2000.

§ 284.502 Procedures for applying for market-based rates. ( a ) Applications for market-based rates may be filed with certificate applications. Service, notice, intervention, and protest procedures for such filings will conform with those applicable to the certificate application.
( b ) With respect to applications not filed as part of certificate applications, ( 1 ) Applicants providing service under subpart B or subpart G of this part must file a request for declaratory order and comply with the service and filing requirements of part 154 of this chapter. Interventions and protests to applications for market-based rates must be filed within 30 days of the application unless the notice issued by the Commission provides otherwise. An applicant providing service under subpart B or subpart G of this part cannot charge market-based rates under this subpart of this part until its application has been accepted by the Commission. Once accepted, the applicant can make the appropriate filing necessary to set its market-based rates into effect.
( 2 ) Applicants providing service under subpart C of this part must file in accordance with the requirements of that subpart.
### SUBCHAPTER LIII—MORRISTOWN NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK