alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011194EN.01001002.xml

| 2.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 194/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 194/10

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Simvoulio tis Epikratias (Greece) lodged on 15 April 2011 — Sillogos Ellinon Poleodomon kai Khorotakton v (1) Ipourgos Perivallontos, Khorotaxias kai Dimosion Ergon, (2) Ipourgos Ikonomias kai Ikonomikon, (3) Ipourgos Esoterikon, Dimosias Diikisis kai Apokentrosis

(Case C-177/11)

2011/C 194/14

Language of the case: Greek

Referring court

Referring court

Simvoulio tis Epikratias

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Sillogos Ellinon Poleodomon kai Khorotakton

Applicant:

Defendants: (1) Ipourgos Perivallontos, Khorotaxias kai Dimosion Ergon, (2) Ipourgos Ikonomias kai Ikonomikon, (3) Ipourgos Esoterikon, Dimosias Diikisis kai Apokentrosis

Defendants:

Question referred

Question referred

Does Article 3(2)(b) of Directive 2001/42/ΕC on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment (OJ 2001 L 197, p. 30), in providing that an environmental assessment is to be carried out for all plans and programmes ‘which, in view of the likely effect on sites, have been determined to require an assessment pursuant to Article 6 or 7 of Directive 92/43/ΕEC’, mean that the obligation to make a particular plan subject to an environmental assessment depends on the preconditions for environmental assessment under Directive 92/43/ΕEC being met in respect of that plan and that, therefore, the provision in question of Directive 2001/42/ΕC also requires, like the above provisions of Directive 92/43/ΕEC, affirmation that the plan is likely to have a significant effect on a special area of conservation, whilst leaving the substantive assessment in that regard to the Member States? Or is Article 3(2)(b) of Directive 2001/42 to be interpreted as meaning that the requirement to carry out an environmental assessment under that provision does not depend on the preconditions for carrying out an environmental assessment under Directive 92/43 being met, that is to say on the finding as to the likelihood of significant effects on a special area of conservation, and it is sufficient to find that a particular plan is connected in some way with a site envisaged in Directive 92/43, but not necessarily with a special area of conservation, in order for the obligation to carry out such an assessment to be activated?

---
# C_2010134EN.01003702.xml

| 22.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 134/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/37

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 26 March 2010 — Alisei v Commission

(Case T-16/10 R)

(Interim measures - Programme establishing a ‘food facility’ intended for developing countries - Call for proposals for the grant of funding - Refusal of funding - Application for suspension of operation - Lack of interest in bringing proceedings - Disregard of formal requirements - Inadmissibility)

2010/C 134/64

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Alisei (Rome, Italy) (represented by: F. Sciaudone, R. Sciaudone and A. Neri, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Prete and P. van Nuffel, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for interim measures relating to the selection of applications for funding submitted under the ‘Facility for rapid response to soaring food prices in developing countries’ (EuropeAid/128608/C/ACT/Multi).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
§ 154.208 Service of tariff filings on customers and other parties. ( a ) On or before the filing date, the company must serve, upon all customers as of the date of the filing and all affected state regulatory commissions, an abbreviated form of the filing consisting of: The Letter of Transmittal; the Statement of Nature, Reason, and Basis; the changed tariff sheets or sections; a summary of the cost-of-service and rate base; and, summary of the magnitude of the change.
( b ) On or before the filing date, the company must serve a full copy of the filing upon all customers and state regulatory commissions that have made a standing request for such service.
( c ) Within two business days of receiving a request for a complete copy from any customer or state commission that has not made a standing request, the company must serve a full copy of any filing.
( d ) A customer or other party may designate a recipient of service. The filing company must serve the designated recipient, in accordance with this section, instead of the customer or other party. For the purposes of this section, service upon the designated recipient will be deemed service upon the customer or other party.
( e ) The company may choose to effect service either electronically or by paper. Such service must be made in accordance with the requirements of Part 385 of this chapter.
( f ) Unless it seeks a waiver of electronic service, each customer or party entitled to service of initial tariff filings under this section must notify the company of the e-mail address to which service should be directed. A customer or party may seek a waiver of electronic service by filing a waiver request under Part 390 of this chapter, providing good cause for its inability to accept electronic service.
[Order 582, 60 FR 52996, Oct. 11, 1995, as amended by Order 582A, 61 FR 9628, Mar. 11, 1996; Order 714, 73 FR 57535, Oct. 3, 2008]
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

December 14, 2020

No. 04

- 20

- 00499

- CV

WEEKS MARINE COMPANY, LLC, Appellant

v.

David LANDA
, Appellee

From t he 381st Judicial District Court

, Starr County, Texas Trial Court No. DC

- 20

- 197 Honorable Jose Luis Garza , Judge Presiding



### ORDER

On December 11, 2020, appellant filed (1) a Motion Recommending Admission Pro Ha c Vic e and (2) an Unopposed Non

- Resident Attorney’s Motion for Admission Pro Ha c Vic e , each requesting this court allow Mr. Jefferson R. Tillery to
appear pro ha c vic e to serve as appellate co

- counsel for appellant. The motions are GRANTED

.

______________ ___________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 14th day of December, 2020

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ
, Clerk of Court
<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT 99.3


    Report of Independent Accountants on Management's Assertion on Compliance
              with the Minimum Servicing Standards Set Forth in the
             UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM FOR MORTGAGE BANKERS



The Board of Directors
Aames Financial Corporation

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying report
titled REPORT OF MANAGEMENT, that Aames Financial Corporation (the Company)
complied with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers
Association of America's UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM FOR MORTGAGE BANKERS
(USAP) during the year ended June 30, 2000. Management is responsible for the
Company's compliance with those requirements. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on management's assertions about the Company's compliance based on
our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with those
requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in
the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the
Company's compliance with specified requirements.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned requirements during the year ended June 30, 2000, is fairly
stated, in all material respects.




August 24, 2000
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      380,665
<ALLOWANCES>                                        27,000
<INVENTORY>                                        585,307
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,278,078
<PP&E>                                             182,810
<DEPRECIATION>                                      90,381
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,251,014
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,583,988
<BONDS>                                          1,329,879
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             1,717
<OTHER-SE>                                       (677,999)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,251,014
<SALES>                                          2,201,975
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,201,975
<CGS>                                              955,229
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      955,229
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 181,038
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (644,477)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (644,477)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (644,477)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.04)




</TABLE>
**Exhibit 21**

 

 

MFRI, Inc. has the following wholly owned subsidiaries:

 

| 1. | Midwesco Filter Resources, Inc. (Delaware corporation) |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Perma-Pipe, Inc. (Delaware corporation) |
|----|-----------------------------------------|

 

| 3. | TDC Filter Manufacturing, Inc. (Delaware corporation) |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 4. | Thermal Care, Inc. (Delaware corporation) |
|----|-------------------------------------------|

 

| 5. | Midwesco Mechanical and Energy, Inc. (Delaware corporation) |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------|
### §1506. Additional Assistant Secretary; appointment; applicability of section 1505

There shall be on and after July 2, 1954 in the Department of Commerce, in addition to the Assistant Secretaries now provided for by law, one additional Assistant Secretary of Commerce, who shall be appointed by the President by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, and who shall be subject in all respects to the provisions of section 1505 of this title, relating to Assistant Secretaries of Commerce.

(July 2, 1954, ch. 456, title III, §304, 68 Stat. 430.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section constitutes the first sentence of section 304 of act July 2, 1954. The second sentence of such section 304 repealed section 3 of Reorg. Plan 5 of 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1263, set out as a note under section 1501 of this title, which established the position of Administrative Assistant Secretary of Commerce.

Section was formerly classified to section 592a–3 of Title 5 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, by Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 378.
EXHIBIT 10.2





FIRST AMENDMENT


TO THE


ALLIANCE
LAUNDRY HOLDINGS LLC NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED


COMPENSATION PLAN





WHEREAS, Alliance Laundry Holdings LLC (the Company) adopted the Alliance Laundry Holdings LLC Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (the Plan) on February 27, 2002;
and





WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan;





NOW, THEREFORE, the Company amends the Plan, effective as of the date set forth herein:





| | 1. |  | The introduction paragraph of the Plan, prior to Section I, shall be replaced in its entirety with the following:
| | -- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Alliance Laundry Holdings LLC hereby establishes, effective as of October 1, 2002, the Alliance Laundry Holdings LLC
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. Such Plan provides certain eligible employees and members with the opportunity to defer portions of their base salary, bonus payments and other payments in
accordance with the provisions of the Plan.





| | 2. |  | Section 2.2 (iii) of the Plan, shall be replaced in its entirety with the following:
| | -- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




First Plan Year. Unless otherwise provided by the Committee, an Eligible Employee or Eligible Member who desires to defer all or part of his Base
Salary for services rendered on and after October 1, 2002 through December 31, 2002 (i.e., the first Plan Year) or all or part of his Bonus that is earned during 2002 must complete and deliver an Election Agreement to the Committee during the period
beginning on September 1, 2002 and ending September 30, 2002.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company
has executed this instrument this 21 st day of June, 2002.





ALLIANCE LAUNDRY HOLDINGS LLCBy:

/s/ Bruce P RoundsTitle:

Vice PresidentCFO
# C_2013046EN.01000702.xml

| 16.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 19 December 2012 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Elegktiko Sinedrio — Greece) — Epitropos tou Elegktikou Sinedriou sto Ipourgio Politismou kai Tourismou v Ipourgio Politismou kai Tourismou — Ipiresia Dimosionomikou Elenchou

(Case C-363/11) (1)

1

(Request for a preliminary ruling - Concept of ‘court or tribunal of a Member State’ within the meaning of Article 267 TFEU - Proceedings intended to lead to a decision of a judicial nature - National court of auditors ruling on prior authorisation of public expenditure - Inadmissibility)

2013/C 46/13

Language of the case: Greek

Referring court

Referring court

Elegktiko Sinedrio

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Epitropos tou Elegktikou Sinedriou sto Ipourgio Politismou kai Tourismou

Applicant:

Defendant: Ipourgio Politismou kai Tourismou — Ipiresia Dimosionomikou Elenchou

Defendant:

Third party: Konstantinos Antonopoulos

Third party:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Elegktiko Synedrio — Interpretation of clause 4(1) of the Annex to Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 concerning the framework agreement on fixed term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP (OJ 1999 L 175, p. 43) and Article 153 TFEU — Employment condition or working condition — Meaning — Conditions of remuneration for time engaged in trade union activities, as leave for trade union business — Inclusion

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The reference for a preliminary ruling from the Elegktiko Sinedrio (Greece) made by decision of 1 July 2011 is inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 269, 10.9.2011.

1

---
### §78d–3. Appearance and practice before the Commission

#### (a) Authority to censure

The Commission may censure any person, or deny, temporarily or permanently, to any person the privilege of appearing or practicing before the Commission in any way, if that person is found by the Commission, after notice and opportunity for hearing in the matter—

(1) not to possess the requisite qualifications to represent others;

(2) to be lacking in character or integrity, or to have engaged in unethical or improper professional conduct; or

(3) to have willfully violated, or willfully aided and abetted the violation of, any provision of the securities laws or the rules and regulations issued thereunder.

#### (b) Definition

With respect to any registered public accounting firm or associated person, for purposes of this section, the term "improper professional conduct" means—

(1) intentional or knowing conduct, including reckless conduct, that results in a violation of applicable professional standards; and

(2) negligent conduct in the form of—

(A) a single instance of highly unreasonable conduct that results in a violation of applicable professional standards in circumstances in which the registered public accounting firm or associated person knows, or should know, that heightened scrutiny is warranted; or

(B) repeated instances of unreasonable conduct, each resulting in a violation of applicable professional standards, that indicate a lack of competence to practice before the Commission.

(June 6, 1934, ch. 404, title I, §4C, as added Pub. L. 107–204, title VI, §602, July 30, 2002, 116 Stat. 794.)
EXHIBIT 23.1
  Consent
    of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
     Form 10-K
  
    Form S-8
    No. 333-02666
    (dated March 22, 1996) pertaining to The Shaw Group
    Inc. 1993 Employee Stock Option Plan
    Form S-8
    No. 333-36315
    (dated September 24, 1997) pertaining to The Shaw
    Group Inc. 1996
    Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan
    Form S-8
    No. 333-87175
    (dated September 16, 1999) pertaining to The Shaw
    Group Inc. 1993
    Employee Stock Option Plan
    Form S-8
    No. 333-62852
    (dated June 12, 2001) pertaining to The Shaw Group
    Inc. 1996
    Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan
    Form S-8
    No. 333-62856
    (dated June 12, 2001) pertaining to The Shaw Group
    Inc. 2001 Employee Incentive Compensation Plan and The Shaw
    Group Inc. Stone & Webster Acquisition Stock Option
    Plan
    Form S-8
    No. 333-105520
    (dated May 23, 2003) pertaining to The Shaw Group Inc.
    2001 Employee Incentive Compensation Plan
    Form S-8
    No. 333-115154
    (dated May 4, 2004) pertaining to The Shaw Group Inc.
    2001 Employee Incentive Compensation Plan and The Shaw Group
    Inc. 1996 Non Employee Director Stock Option Plan
    Form S-8
    No. 333-115155
    (dated May 4, 2004) pertaining to The Shaw Group Inc.
    401(k) Plan and The Shaw Group Inc. 401(k) Plan for Certain
    Hourly Employees
    Form S-8
    No. 333-132167
    (dated March 2, 2006) pertaining to The Shaw Group
    Inc. 2001 Employee Incentive Compensation Plan and The Shaw
    Group Inc. 2005 Non-Employee Director Stock Incentive Plan
    (f/k/a 1996 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan)
    Form S-8
    No. 333-160557
    (dated July 13, 2009) pertaining to The Shaw Group
    Inc. 401(k) Plan and The Shaw Group Inc. 401(k) Plan for Certain
    Hourly Employees.
    Form S-8
    No. 333-160556
    (dated July 13, 2009) pertaining to The Shaw Group
    Inc. 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan.  KPMG
    LLP
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.45

Nutrition For Life International, Inc.
9101 Jameel
Houston, Texas 77040

Dear Gentlemen and Ladies:

This letter agreement is being provided in connection with a merger transaction
in which I will be receiving shares of convertible preferred stock of Nutrition
For Life International, Inc. (the "Company").  I understand that a condition to
closing of the merger is the execution and delivery to the Company of this
lockup agreement.

For a period of one year from the date of closing of the merger, I will not,
directly or indirectly, sell, offer to sell, contract to sell (including without
limitation, any short sale), grant any option to purchase or otherwise transfer
or dispose of (other than to parents, siblings, spouses or lineal descendants or
a trust for any of the foregoing who agree to these restrictions) any of the
securities received by me from the Company in connection with the merger
(including any securities which are received upon conversion of the convertible
preferred stock).

I acknowledge and agree that (a) I will be benefited directly and indirectly by
an investment in the Company and by the merger and the Company's officers,
directors and shareholders may rely on the agreement set forth in this letter
and (b) this letter agreement may be specifically enforced because of the
irreparable harm that could result from any breaches of this letter agreement.
This letter agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the
laws of the State of Texas. In the event any one or more provisions of this
letter agreement should be held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any
respect, such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability shall not affect any
other provisions hereof.

Dated: December 1, 1999                      ___________________________________
                                             Signature

                                             Neil Sirkin
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Print Name
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 of Aurizon Mines Ltd. of our report dated March 16, 2012, relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting which appears in the Exhibit incorporated by reference in this Annual Report.







Chartered Accountants





Vancouver, British Columbia


March 16, 2012






PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Chartered Accountants


PricewaterhouseCoopers Place, 250 Howe Street, Suite 700, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6C 3S7


T: +1604 806 7000, F: +1604 806 7806, www.pwc.com/ca





“PwC” refers to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an Ontario limited liability partnership, which is a member firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers International :imited, each member firm of which is a separate legal entity.