alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 385.1402 Subscriber lists (Rule 1402). ( a ) Not later than December 31 of each year, an oil pipeline must request, in writing, each of its subscribers and each person who has been served under any of its tariffs during the preceding twelve months to notify the pipeline as to whether the subscriber or person wishes to be included on the subscriber list for any of the oil pipeline's integrated pipeline systems.
( b ) The oil pipeline must immediately add to the specified subscriber list any subscriber or person which responds in writing within 30 days of receipt of the oil pipeline request and which indicates in that response that it wishes to be included on the specified list.
[Order 312, 48 FR 29479, June 27, 1983]
§ 342.2 Establishing initial rates. A carrier must justify an initial rate for new service by: ( a ) Filing cost, revenue, and throughput data supporting such rate as required by part 346 of this chapter; or
( b ) Filing a sworn affidavit that the rate is agreed to by at least one non-affiliated person who intends to use the service in question, *provided* that if a protest to the initial rate is filed, the carrier must comply with paragraph (a) of this section.
[Order 561, 58 FR 58779, Nov. 4, 1993, as amended at 59 FR 59146, Nov. 16, 1994]
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



In
connection with the Annual Report of Macromedia, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-K for the annual period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stephen
A. Elop, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, in accordance with Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report, to which this certification is attached as exhibit 32.1, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                     |  | 
|Dated: June 14, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ STEPHEN A. ELOP    
|                     |  |  |  | Stephen A. Elop        
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request. This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities Act of
1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
111298720 v1

1/20/2016

U. S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Amendment to Exemption 11063A issued pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA 

Reform Act and Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations in Regulatory Docket 

No. FAA-2014-0358.

Dear Sir or Madam;

Snaproll Media was issued an Exemption numbered 11063A for the purpose of 

conducting scripted, closed-set filming for the motion picture, television industry and Aerial Data 

Collection. Snaproll Media herby requests an amendment to the Exemption to allow an

additional type of unmanned aircraft system FreeFly Alta that fully complies with the conditions 

of the Exemption. 

Snaproll Media wishes to operate a FreeFly Alta under the same terms and conditions 

contained in the Exemption. Attached hereto, and submitted as a confidential document, is the 

Flight Operations and Procedures Manual (FOPM) for the additional UAS. All operations of the 

additional UAS will be in full compliance with the terms of the Exemption.

As this is an amendment to an existing exemption asking for only the addition of another 

type of unmanned aerial vehicle, SnapRoll Media respectfully submits that good cause exists so 

that notice does not need to be published in the Federal Register for the requested amendment.

Please contact the undersigned should you have any question concerning this request 

for an amendment to the Exemption.

Sincerely yours, Spencer Valdez

cc:

James Williams

Robert Pappas

Jake Troutman
<PAGE>


Exhibit 99.2

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Scott Henricks, President and Chief Financial Officer (principal accounting
officer) of iLive, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my
knowledge:

(1)      the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal
         quarter ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



Dated: August 14, 2002



                                    /s/Scott Henricks
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Name: Scott Henricks
                                    Title: President and Chief Financial Officer
                                    (principal accounting officer)
### §5903. Relation to other laws

This chapter shall supersede any provision of State law (or the law of any political subdivision of a State) that is inconsistent with this chapter.

(Pub. L. 103–55, §4, July 28, 1993, 107 Stat. 277.)
#### § 1317.200 Application.

Except as provided in §§ 1317.205 through 1317.235(a), these Title IX regulations apply to every recipient and to each education program or activity operated by such recipient that receives Federal financial assistance.
EXHIBIT 32

Section 906 Certification

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., the sole general partner of Host Hotels &
Resorts, L.P., (the Company) hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the
Company for the period ended March 24, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended: and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 3, 2006



/s/ Christopher J. NassettaChristopher J. NassettaChief Executive Officer of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc./s/ W. Edward WalterW. Edward WalterChief Financial Officer of Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of
any general incorporation language in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
(66 South. 773)

No. 19957.

#### HYATT v. LINDNER et al.

(Nov. 30, 1914.)

*(Syllabus by Editorial Staff.)*

Appeal and Error <@=^790 — Moot Questions.

A suit by a judgment creditor to clear his. debtor’s property of mortgages alleged to be simulated, so that the judgment may be executed, becomes functus officio where, pending trial, the judgment is annulled on appeal, and the suit must be dismissed.

[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Appeal and Error, Cent. Dig. §§ 47, 3132, 4383, 4384; Dec. Dig. <S=^790.]

Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; Fred D. King, Judge.

Suit by Mrs. Mary Jane Hyatt, widow of Louis Fe'arson, against John F. Lindner and another. From a decree for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

Suit dismissed.

E. I-I. MeCaleb and Theo. Cotonio, both of New Orleans, for appellants. Lazarus, Michel & Lazarus, of New Orleans, for appellee Hyatt. Emile Pomes, of New Orleans, for appellee Sahuque. Dinkelspiel, Hart & Davey, of New Orleans, for appellee Metropolitan Bank & Trust Co. George Montgomery, of New Orleans, for appellee recorder of' mortgages.

PRO YO STY, J.

The object of the present suit was to clear the property of plaintiff’s, judgment debtor of certain mortgages alleged to be simulated, in order that plaintiff might execute her judgment; but after this suit had been filed and tried, plaintiff’s said judgment was annulled on appeal, so that plaintiff no longer has any judgment to execute, and this suit is functus officio.

This suit is therefore dismissed, at plaintiff’s cost in both courts.
#### § 34.8 Verification.

The original application shall be signed by an authorized representative of the applicant, who has knowledge of the matters set forth therein, and it shall be verified under oath.

###### Effective Date Note

#### Effective Date Note:

At 70 FR 35375, June 20, 2005, § 34.8 was revised, effective at the time of the next e-filing release during the Commission's next fiscal year. For the convenience of the user, the revised text follows:

#### § 34.8 Verification.

An application verification shall be signed under oath by an authorized representative of the applicant, who has knowledge of the matters set forth therein and as provided in § 385.2005 of this chapter, and retained at the applicant's business location until the relevant proceeding has been concluded.
### §78z. Unlawful representations

No action or failure to act by the Commission or the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, in the administration of this chapter shall be construed to mean that the particular authority has in any way passed upon the merits of, or given approval to, any security or any transaction or transactions therein, nor shall such action or failure to act with regard to any statement or report filed with or examined by such authority pursuant to this chapter or rules and regulations thereunder, be deemed a finding by such authority that such statement or report is true and accurate on its face or that it is not false or misleading. It shall be unlawful to make, or cause to be made, to any prospective purchaser or seller of a security any representation that any such action or failure to act by any such authority is to be so construed or has such effect.

(June 6, 1934, ch. 404, title I, §26, 48 Stat. 902; Pub. L. 105–353, title III, §301(b)(5), Nov. 3, 1998, 112 Stat. 3236.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this title". See References in Text note set out under section 78a of this title.

#### Amendments

1998—Pub. L. 105–353 substituted "Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System" for "Federal Reserve Board".

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of Securities and Exchange Commission, with certain exceptions, to Chairman of such Commission, see Reorg. Plan No. 10 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3175, 64 Stat. 1265, set out under section 78d of this title.
§ 354.131 Decomposition. Carcasses of rabbits deleteriously affected by post-mortem changes shall be disposed of as follows: ( a ) Carcasses which have reached a state of putrefaction or stinking fermentation shall be condemned.
( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) Carcasses affected by types of post-mortem change which are superficial in nature may be certified for food after removal and condemnation of affected parts.
# C_2013225EN.01006301.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/63 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/63

---

Judgment of the General Court of 30 May 2013 — DHL International v OHIM — Service Point Solutions (SERVICEPOINT)

(Case T-218/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark SERVICEPOINT - Earlier Community marks ServicePoint and earlier national marks - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 76(1) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2013/C 225/140

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: DHL International (Bonn, Germany) (represented: initially by K.-U. Jonas and J. Bogatz, then M. Viefhues, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Service Point Solutions, SA (Barcelona, Spain) (represented: initially by E. Zamora Martinez, then C. Osterrieth, T. Schmitz and A. Doepner, and finally I. Valdelomar Serrano, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 February 2012 (Case R 62/2009-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Service Point Solutions, SA and SHL Operations BV.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the application; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application;

| 2. | Orders DHL International GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders DHL International GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 195, 17.7.2010.

1

---
### §6407. Lobbying restrictions

No funds collected by the Council shall be used in any manner for influencing legislation or elections, except that the Council may recommend to the Secretary changes in this chapter or other statutes that would further the purposes of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 104–284, §8, Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3375.)
§ 385.1117 Petition for adjustment treated as request for interpretation (Rule 1117). ( a ) Staff may, if appropriate, treat a petition filed under Rule 1103 (petition for adjustment) as a request for an interpretation under section 502(c) of the NGPA, or rule or order issued under that Act.
( b ) If the Staff exercises its discretion under paragraph (a) of this section to treat a petition for adjustment as a request for an interpretation, then: ( 1 ) Staff will notify the parties to the proceeding that the petition is being treated as a request for an interpretation under Rule 1901; and
( 2 ) The time limits in this section are stayed pending issuance of the interpretation.
( c ) After the interpretation is issued, if the petitioner wishes to reinstate the adjustment proceeding, the petitioner may do so by notifying the Commission in writing that the petition should be reinstated.
§ 357.4 FERC Form No. 6-Q, Quarterly report of oil pipeline companies. ( a ) *Prescription.* The quarterly financial report form of oil pipeline companies, designated as FERC Form No. 6-Q, is prescribed for the reporting quarter ending March 31, 2004, and each quarter thereafter.
( b ) *Filing requirements* — ( 1 ) *Who must file.* Each oil pipeline company, subject to the provisions of section 20 of the Interstate Commerce Act, must prepare and file with the Commission FERC Form No. 6-Q.
( 2 ) *When to file and what to file.* This quarterly financial report form must be filed as follows: ( i ) The quarterly financial report for the period January 1 through March 31, 2004, must be filed on or before July 23, 2004.
( ii ) The quarterly financial report for the period April 1 through June 30, 2004, must be filed on or before September 22, 2004.
( iii ) The quarterly financial report for the period July 1 through September 30, 2004, must be filed on or before December 23, 2004.
( iv ) The quarterly financial report for the period January 1 through March 31, 2005, must be filed on or before June 13, 2005.
( v ) This report must be filed as prescribed in § 385.2011 of this chapter and as indicated in the General Instructions set out in the quarterly report form, and must be properly completed and verified. Filing on electronic media pursuant to § 385.2011 of this chapter will be required commencing with the reporting quarter ending March 31, 2004, due on or before
( vi ) The quarterly financial report for the period April 1 through June 30, 2005, must be filed on or before September 12, 2005.
( vii ) Subsequent quarterly financial reports must be filed within 70 days from the end of the reporting quarter.
( viii ) The quarterly financial report for the period July 1 through September 30, 2005 must be filed on or before December 13, 2005.
[69 FR 9045, Feb. 26, 2004, as amended by Order 646-A, 69 FR 32444, June 10, 2004]
Exhibit 11.1
<TABLE>

                            Asante Technologies, Inc.
                        Calculation of Earnings per Share
                    (in thousands, except per share amounts)

<CAPTION>
                                                                                  Year ended
                                                              --------------------------------------------------
                                                                September 28,    September 30,   September 30,
                                                                   1996             1995              1994
                                                              --------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                            <C>               <C>              <C>            
Net income for calculation of earnings per share               $          (457)  $       (3,705)  $         1,125
                                                               ===============   ==============   ===============


Average number of common and common equivalent shares:
     Weighted average common shares outstanding                          8,718            8,288             7,623
     Dilutive common stock equivalents:
         Common stock options, using treasury stock method                 279              *               1,150
                                                               ---------------   --------------   ---------------
Common and common equivalent shares to be used in the
     calculation of net income per share                                 8,997            8,288             8,773
                                                               ===============   ==============   ===============
Earnings per share                                             $         (0.05)  $        (0.45)  $          0.13
                                                               ===============   ==============   ===============
<FN>
* Antidilutive
</FN>
</TABLE>
Meeting Record | The White House

http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/2060_meeting_08222013 [9/13/2013 12:37:43 PM] Get Email Updates Contact Us

Home • The Administration • Office of Management and Budget

REGULATION & INFORMATION POLICY 

### About OIRA Information Policy Federal Collection of Information Regulatory Matters

Meetings and Outside Communication Reports to Congress For Agencies Statistical Programs & Standards 

# Meeting Record

Meeting Record Regarding: Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from New Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generation Units Date: 8 / 22 / 2013

Name Affiliation Client (if applicable) Bob Wayland EPA
Nick Hudson EPA Barry Ellman EPA Nathan Frey OMB/OIRA Jim Laity OMB/OIRA
Bruce Hill CATF John Thompson CATF
Ann Weeks CATF Drew McConville CEQ
Anne Finken CEQ

Meeting material provided to OMB ( pages, kb)

Document 1 (22 pages, 953 kb) 

### About OMBlog The Budget Management Regulation & Information Policy Legislative Information Join OMB Contact OMB

Home The White House Blog Photos & Videos
Photo Galleries Video Performances Live Streams Podcasts Briefing Room Your Weekly Address Speeches & Remarks Press Briefings Statements & Releases White House Schedule Presidential Actions Legislation Nominations & Appointments Issues Civil Rights Defense Disabilities Economy Education Energy & Environment Ethics Equal Pay Foreign Policy The Administration
President Barack Obama Vice President Joe Biden First Lady Michelle Obama Dr. Jill Biden The Cabinet White House Staff Executive Office of the President Other Advisory Boards About the White House
Inside the White House Presidents First Ladies The Oval Office The Vice President's Residence & Office Eisenhower Executive Office Building Camp David Our Government
The Executive Branch The Legislative Branch The Judicial Branch The Constitution Federal Agencies & Commissions Elections & Voting State & Local Government Resources Federal Register | Join OMB | FOIA | No FEAR Act | OMB Locator | USA.Gov | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Site SearchMeeting Record | The White House

http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/2060_meeting_08222013 [9/13/2013 12:37:43 PM] Disclosures Health Care Homeland Security Immigration Refinancing Rural Service Seniors & Social Security Snapshots Taxes Technology Urban and Economic Mobility Veterans Violence Prevention Women Air Force One White House Fellows White House Internships Tours & Events Mobile Apps

En español Accessibility Copyright Information Privacy Policy Contact USA.gov Developers Apply for a Job
### §6006. "Approved bicycle helmet" defined

In this chapter, the term "approved bicycle helmet" means a bicycle helmet that meets—

(1) any interim standard described in section 6004(b) of this title, pending establishment of a final standard under section 6004(c) of this title; and

(2) the final standard, once it is established under section 6004(c) of this title.

(Pub. L. 103–267, title II, §207, June 16, 1994, 108 Stat. 728.)
#### § 381.74 Poultry suspected of having biological residues.

When any poultry at an official establishment is suspected of having been treated with or exposed to any substance that may impart a biological residue that would make their edible tissues adulterated, they shall, at the option of the operator of the establishment, be processed at the establishment and the carcasses and all parts thereof retained under U.S. Retained tags, pending final disposition in accordance with § 381.80, of this part, and other provisions in subpart K; or they shall be slaughtered at the establishment and buried or incinerated in a manner satisfactory to the inspector. Alternatively, such poultry may be returned to the grower, if further holding is likely to result in their not being adulterated by reason of any residue. The Inspection Service will notify the other Federal and State agencies concerned of such action. To aid in determining the amount of residue present in the poultry, officials of the Inspection Service may permit the slaughter of any such poultry for the purpose of collecting tissues for analysis of the residue. Such analysis may include the use of inplant screening procedures designed to detect the presence of antimicrobial residues in any species of poultry.

[47 FR 41336, Sept. 20, 1982]