alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 December 2011 – Stichting Woonpunt and Others v Commission**

**(Case T-203/10)**

State aid – Scheme of aid granted by the Netherlands to housing corporations – Existing aid – Decision accepting Member State’s commitments – Decision declaring new aid compatible – Action for annulment – Not individually concerned – No interest in bringing proceedings – Inadmissibility

1.                     *Actions for annulment – Natural or legal persons – Measures of direct and individual concern to them – Commission decision
declaring modifications to an existing aid scheme concerning the general system of financing housing corporations compatible
with the internal market – Access to the aid scheme opened on the basis of objective criteria and without limitation as to
the number of potential beneficiaries – Action of a company eligible for that scheme – Inadmissibility (Art. 263, fourth para.,
TFEU) (see paras 25-26, 28-30, 34-35, 42)*

2.                     *Actions for annulment – Natural or legal persons – Interest in bringing proceedings – Action by a potential beneficiary company
of duly notified State aid brought against the Commission decision declaring it incompatible with the internal market under
certain restrictive conditions – Beneficiaries of new aid not able to invoke unfavourable legal effects in relation to a previous
situation – Inadmissibility (Art. 263, fourth para., TFEU) (see paras 55, 58)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | APPLICATION for annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 9963 final of 15 December 2009 relating to State aid E 2/2005 and N 642/2009 (Netherlands) – Existing and special project aid to housing corporations. |

**Operative part**

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | There is no need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene of Vesteda Groep BV and the Netherlands Vereniging van Institutionele Beleggers in Vastgoed. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3. | | Stichting Woonpunt, Stichting Com.wonen, Woningstichting Haag Wonen and Stichting Woonbedrijf SWS.Hhvl are ordered to bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 4. | | Vesteda Groep and the Netherlands Vereniging van Institutionele Beleggers in Vastgoed, applicants for leave to intervene, are ordered to bear their own costs. |
# Pers Serv 2018

# Pers Serv 2017

# Pers Serv 2016

# Pers Serv 2015

# Pers Serv 2014

# Pers Serv 2013

# Parameters
#### § 385.1501 Scope (Rule 1501).

The rules in this subpart apply to and govern proceedings for the assessment of civil penalties pursuant to section 31 of the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 823b.
§ 39.8 Delegation to a Regional Entity. ( a ) The Electric Reliability Organization may enter into an agreement to delegate authority to a Regional Entity for the purpose of proposing Reliability Standards to the Electric Reliability Organization and enforcing Reliability Standards under § 39.7.
( b ) After notice and opportunity for comment, the Commission may approve a delegation agreement. A delegation agreement shall not be effective until it is approved by the Commission.
( c ) The Electric Reliability Organization shall file a delegation agreement. Such filing shall include a statement demonstrating that: ( 1 ) The Regional Entity is governed by an independent board, a balanced stakeholder board, or a combination independent and balanced stakeholder board;
( 2 ) The Regional Entity otherwise satisfies the provisions of section 215(c) of the Federal Power Act; and
( 3 ) The agreement promotes effective and efficient administration of Bulk-Power System reliability.
( d ) The Commission may modify such delegation.
( e ) The Electric Reliability Organization shall and the Commission will rebuttably presume that a proposal for delegation to a Regional Entity organized on an Interconnection-wide basis promotes effective and efficient administration of Bulk-Power System reliability and should be approved.
( f ) An entity seeking to enter into a delegation agreement that is unable to reach an agreement with the Electric Reliability Organization within 180 days after proposing a delegation agreement to the Electric Reliability Organization may apply to the Commission to assign to it the Electric Reliability Organization's authority to enforce Reliability Standards within its region. The entity must demonstrate in its application that it meets the requirements of paragraph (c) of this section and that continued negotiations with the Electric Reliability Organization would not likely result in an appropriate delegation agreement within a reasonable period of time. After notice and opportunity for hearing, the Commission may designate the entity as a Regional Entity and assign enforcement authority to it.
( g ) An application pursuant to paragraph (f) of this section must state: ( 1 ) Whether the Commission's Dispute Resolution Service, or other alternative dispute resolution procedures were used, or why these procedures were not used; and
( 2 ) Whether the Regional Entity believes that alternative dispute resolution under the Commission's supervision could successfully resolve the disputes regarding the terms of the delegation agreement.
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

**Subsidiaries of Middleburg Financial Corporation**

 

| Name of Subsidiary | State of Organization |
|--------------------|-----------------------|

| MFC Capital Trust II | Delaware |
|----------------------|----------|

| Middleburg Bank | Virginia |
|-----------------|----------|

|   | - Middleburg Bank Service Corporation | Virginia |
|--------|---------------------------------------|----------|

|   | - Southern Trust Mortgage, LLC | Virginia |
|--------|--------------------------------|----------|

| Middleburg Investment Group, Inc. | Virginia |
|-----------------------------------|----------|

|   | - Middleburg Trust Company | Virginia |
|--------|----------------------------|----------|

|   | - Middleburg Investment Advisors, Inc. | Virginia |
|--------|----------------------------------------|----------|
**Exhibit 13.2**

 

**STATEMENT OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF**

**ARCADIS N.V.**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theannual report of ARCADIS N.V. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the periodended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “Report”), I, Ben A. van der Klift, Corporate Director ofFinance of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on myknowledge:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: June 13, 2005 | By:                            | /s/ Ben A. van der Klift |   |
|--------------------------|--------------------------------|--------------------------|--------|
|                     | Ben A. van der Klift           |
|                     | Corporate Director of  Finance |
|                     | (Principal Financial  Officer) |

 

----
#### § 701.76 The Water Resources Council Staff.

The Water Resources Council Staff (hereinafter the Staff) serves the Council and the Chairman in the performance of their functions and in the exercise of their authorities in accordance with the Act, the rules and regulations and other decisions of the Council, and all other laws, rules, regulations, and orders applicable to the Water Resources Council, and will be organized in accordance with a structure approved by the Council.
### LINKS TO FORMS:

The pesticide registration forms that are listed below can be found at:

http://www.epa.gov/opprd001/forms/

Link to C onfidential Statement of Formula and Instructions (Form # 8570 -4 )

http://www.epa.gov/opprd001/forms/8570

- 4.pdf

C ertification of Attempt to Enter Into an Agreement With Registrants for

Development of Data (Form # 8570

- 32 )

http://www.epa.gov/opprd001/forms/8570

- 32.pdf

C ertification With Respect to Citation of Data (Form # 8570

- 34 )

http://www.epa.gov/opprd001/forms/8570

- 34.pdf
TALKING TO KIDS

ABOUT ALCOHOL

5 CONVERSATION GOALS

Research shows that parents are 

the #1 reason young people decide 

not to drink. So, start talking to 

your children about alcohol before 

they start drinking—as early as 9 

years old. Even if it doesn’t seem 

like it, they really do hear you. 
1Show you disapprove of underage drinking.

2Show you care about your child’s happiness and well-being.

3Show you’re a good source of information about alcohol.

4Show you’re paying attention and you’ll notice if your 

child drinks.

5Build your child’s skills and strategies for avoiding 

underage drinking.

UNDERAGEDRINKING.SAMHSA.GOV

Keep it low-key. Don’t worry, you don’t have to get everything across in one talk. Many small talks are better.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTAHQN,,"" FEDERALAVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

# t'"1 

# i:: E[)
) 

### FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION ) ) 

## OCT 15 2015 

## HEARING DOCKFT Complainant, ) ) v. ) ) ) 

### SKYWEST AIRLINES, INC. ) ) 

### Respondent. ) FAA Case Nos. 2011NM060047 eta!. FDMS Nos. FAA-2012-0872 eta!. (consolidated)

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

### Please take notice that Gerald F. Murphy, Marc L. Warren and Paul Alp ofthe law firm Crowell & 

### Moring LLP hereby enter their appearance as counsel for Respondent SkyWest Airlines, Inc. in the above-captioned matter. Please serve all future correspondence, filings and submissions accordingly.

Dated: October 14, 2015 Respectfully Submitted,

Gerald F. 

### Murphy Marc L. Warren Paul Alp CROWELL & 

### MORING LLP 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20004 Telephone: (202) 624-2500 Facsimile: (202) 628-5116CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certifythat onthis 141 h day ofOctober, 2015 tbe original and two (2) copies of the foregoing Notice ofAppearance was sent viaFederal Express, postage prepaid, to:
Federal Aviation Administration 600 Independence Avenue SW Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2W1000 Washington, D.C. 20591 Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430

I hereby certify tbat on this 141 h day ofOctober, 2015, a true and correct copy ofthe foregoing Notice ofAppearance was sentvia electronic mail and Federal Express, postage prepaid, to:

Dated: October 14,2015 Casey E. Gardner, Esq. Enforcement Division, AGC-300 Federal Aviation Administration Office ofthe ChiefCounsel 800 Independence Ave., SW Washint,>ion, D.C. 20591 Casey.Gardner@faa.gov Counsel for Complainant

Paul Alp
HELPING A LOVED ONE DEALING WITH 

MENTAL AND/OR SUBSTANCE USE DISORDERS 

You may suspect or discover your loved one is dealing with a mental illness, 

drinking too much, or using drugs. As a family member, you can play a central

role in getting them the help they need. 

REMEMBER MENTAL AND 

SUBSTANCE USE DISORDERS 

ARE TREATABLE 

People can, and do, recover. 

Family support can make all the 

difference. For more information, 

visit www.SAMHSA.gov/families.

TALK TO YOUR LOVED ONE 

Express your concern and tell 

them that you’re there to help. 

Create a judgement-free and 

loving environment to foster 

conversation and openness. 

BE OPEN 

Discuss your family 

history of mental illness 

or drug and alcohol use, if 

relevant. It may help your 

loved one feel less alone.

SHOW COMPASSION

Be patient as you help your 

loved one locate resources 

BE SURE TO CARE and treatment services. 

FOR YOURSELF TOO

Being a caregiver can 

be highly stressful and 

emotionally draining.

SEEK SUPPORT

If you or a loved one needs 

help, call 1-800-662-HELP 

(4357) for free and 

confidential information 

and treatment referral.

SAMHSA’s mission is to reduce the impact of substance abuse and mental illness on America’s 

communities. 1-877-SAMHSA-7 (1-877-726-4727) • 1-800-487-4889 (TDD) • www.samhsa.gov
### §4904. Consultation with private sector and government officials

The Secretary shall regularly consult with representatives of the private sector and officials of State and local governments to assess the adequacy of United States trade information. The Secretary shall seek recommendations on how trade information can be made more accessible, understandable, and relevant. The Secretary shall seek recommendations as to what data should be included in the export promotion data system in the Data Bank.

(Pub. L. 100–418, title V, §5404, Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1464.)
STEAM ELECTRIC

C B I R E P L AC E M E NT P A G E

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 20 09

- 0819

DCN:

________________________________________

T H E FO LL OW ING H AS BEE N R E M O V E D BE CAUSE IT
C O N T AINS C O N F ID E N T IAL B USIN E SS IN FO RMA T I O N (C B I) P E R 4 0 C F R P ART 2
, SU B P ART B

. SE04360A173
§ 358.2 General principles. ( a ) As more fully described and implemented in subsequent sections of this part, a transmission provider must treat all transmission customers, affiliated and non-affiliated, on a not unduly discriminatory basis, and must not make or grant any undue preference or advantage to any person or subject any person to any undue prejudice or disadvantage with respect to any transportation of natural gas or transmission of electric energy in interstate commerce, or with respect to the wholesale sale of natural gas or of electric energy in interstate commerce.
( b ) As more fully described and implemented in subsequent sections of this part, a transmission provider's transmission function employees must function independently from its marketing function employees, except as permitted in this part or otherwise permitted by Commission order.
( c ) As more fully described and implemented in subsequent sections of this part, a transmission provider and its employees, contractors, consultants and agents are prohibited from disclosing, or using a conduit to disclose, non-public transmission function information to the transmission provider's marketing function employees.
( d ) As more fully described and implemented in subsequent sections of this part, a transmission provider must provide equal access to non-public transmission function information disclosed to marketing function employees to all its transmission customers, affiliated and non-affiliated, except as permitted in this part or otherwise permitted by Commission order.
[74 FR 54482, Oct. 22, 2009]
<PAGE>


Exhibit 99.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Albert Aimers, the Chief Executive Officer of iLive, Inc. (the "Company"),
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)      the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal
         quarter ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.




Dated: August 14, 2002



                                                  /s/ Albert Aimers
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Name: Albert Aimers
                                                  Title: Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1


    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gouverneur Bancorp Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Richard F. Bennett, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
         2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the
              Report.



February 11, 2004                     By: /s/ RICHARD F. BENNETT
                                          ----------------------

                                      Richard F. Bennett
                                      President and Chief Executive Officer


                                       22
(67 South. 521)

No. 21009.

#### STATE v. FULCO. In re STATE ex rel. MABRY, Dist. Atty.

(Jan. 11, 1915.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 23, 1915.)

• *(Syllabus by the Gourt.)*

Habeas Corpus <&wkey;46 — Jurisdiction—City Court.

The city court of the city of Shreveport is not authorized by the Constitution or by statute to issue the writ of habeas corpus.

[Ed. Note. — Eor other cases, see Habeas Corpus, Cent. Dig. § 36; Dec. Dig. <&wkey;>46.]

Proceedings by the State against Sam Eulco. Eulco was released under a writ of habeas corpus, and the State, on the relation of W. A. Mabry, District Attorney, applies for certiorari, prohibition, and mandamus.

Order of release set aside.

See, also, 135 Da. 273, 65 South. 240.

Wm. A. Mabry, Dist. Atty., of Shreveport, for apxilicant. ' L. C. Blanchard, of Shreveport, City Judge, pro se.

SOMMERVILLE, J.

The writ of habeas corpus is a well recognized and established process, resting upon constitutional and statutory provisions. The state Constitution provides for the issuance of the writ as an existing remedy in the cases to which it properly applies, and designates the courts which may use it. The city court of the city of Shreveport was created by Act No. 103 of 1898, p. 129. This act, and the article of the Constitution, No. 96, which authorized the establishment of the court, do not confer upon that tribunal the right or power to issue the writ of habeas corpus; and therefore it has not the right or power.

The supervisory authority of the Supreme Court was properly invoked in this case.

It is therefore ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the order issued by the respondent judge, releasing Sam Eulco from the custody of the sheriff under the writ of habeas corpus apxilied for by him, be annulled and set aside.
### §77mm. Short title

This subchapter may be cited as the "Corporation of Foreign Bondholders Act, 1933."

(May 27, 1933, ch. 38, title II, §212, 48 Stat. 95.)
#### § 401.97 Enforcement of penalties.

Any penalty imposed by the Commission shall be paid within 30 days or such further time period as shall be fixed by the Commission. The Executive Director and Commission counsel are authorized to take such action as may be necessary to assure enforcement of this subpart. If a proceeding before a court becomes necessary, the action of the Commission in determining a penalty amount shall constitute the penalty amount recommended by the Commission to be fixed by the court pursuant to § 14.17 of the Compact.
# C_2013101EN.01000501.xml

| 6.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 101/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 101/5

---

Order of the Court of 3 October 2012 — Cooperativa Vitivinícola Arousana S. Coop. Galega v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), María Constantina Sotelo Ares

(Case C-649/11 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 8(1)(b) - Likelihood of confusion - Word mark ROSALIA DE CASTRO - Opposition by the proprietor of the national word mark ROSALIA)

2013/C 101/09

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Cooperativa Vitivinícola Arousana S. Coop. Galega (represented by: I. Temiño Ceniceros, Abogado)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carillo, Agent) and María Constantina Sotelo Ares (represented by: C. Lema Devesa, Abogado)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 5 October 2010 in Case T 421/10 Cooperativa Vitivinícola Arousana v OHIM — Sotelo Ares, by which the General Court rejected the action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 July 2010 (Case R 1804/2008-4) relating to opposition proceedings between María Constantina Sotelo Ares and Cooperativa Vitivinícola Arousana, S. Coop. Galega

Cooperativa Vitivinícola Arousana

OHIM — Sotelo Ares

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Cooperativa Vitivinícola Arousana S. Coop. Galega is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Cooperativa Vitivinícola Arousana S. Coop. Galega is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 58, 25.2.2012.

1

---
### §7608. Violations

#### (a) In general

Any violation of this chapter or the rules required under section 7607 of this title shall be treated as a violation of a rule under section 18 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 57a) regarding unfair or deceptive acts or practices.

#### (b) Actions by the Commission

The Federal Trade Commission shall enforce this chapter in the same manner, by the same means, and with the same jurisdiction, powers, and duties as though all applicable terms and provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 41 et seq.) were incorporated into and made a part of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 108–164, §9, Dec. 6, 2003, 117 Stat. 2026.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal Trade Commission Act, referred to in subsec. (b), is act Sept. 26, 1914, ch. 311, 38 Stat. 717, which is classified generally to subchapter I (§41 et seq.) of chapter 2 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 58 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 60 days after Dec. 6, 2003, see section 12 of Pub. L. 108–164, set out as a note under section 7601 of this title.
### §2086. Prohibition on industry-sponsored travel

Notwithstanding section 1353 of title 31 and section 2076(b)(6) of this title, no Commissioner or employee of the Commission shall accept travel, subsistence, or related expenses with respect to attendance by a Commissioner or employee at any meeting or similar function relating to official duties of a Commissioner or an employee, from a person—

(1) seeking official action from, doing business with, or conducting activities regulated by, the Commission; or

(2) whose interests may be substantially affected by the performance or nonperformance of the Commissioner's or employee's official duties.

(Pub. L. 92–573, §39, as added Pub. L. 110–314, title II, §206(a), Aug. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 3044.)