alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| **RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (Details 1) (USD $)** | 3 Months Ended | 6 Months Ended |
|----------------------------------------------------|----------------|----------------|
||
| Management Fees Paid                               | $ 0            | $ 14,622       | $ 0 | $ 29,244 |
| Series One [Member]                                |           |           |   |   |
| Management Fees Paid                               | 0              | 0              | 0 | 0 |
| Series Two [Member]                                |           |           |   |   |
| Management Fees Paid                               | 0              | 5,418          | 0 | 10,836 |
| Series Three [Member]                              |           |           |   |   |
| Management Fees Paid                               | 0              | 0              | 0 | 0 |
| Series Four [Member]                               |           |           |   |   |
| Management Fees Paid                               | 0              | 5,367          | 0 | 10,734 |
| Series Five [Member]                               |           |           |   |   |
| Management Fees Paid                               | 0              | 3,837          | 0 | 7,674 |
| Series Six [Member]                                |           |           |   |   |
| Management Fees Paid                               | $ 0            | $ 0            | $ 0 | $ 0 |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Amount of management fees paid during the period.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**bctci_ManagementFeesPaid**Namespace Prefix:**bctci_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**debit**Period Type:**duration |
§ 39.10 Changes to an Electric Reliability Organization Rule or Regional Entity Rule. ( a ) The Electric Reliability Organization shall file with the Commission for approval any proposed Electric Reliability Organization Rule or Rule change. A Regional Entity shall submit a Regional Entity Rule or Rule change to the Electric Reliability Organization and, if approved by the Electric Reliability Organization, the Electric Reliability Organization shall file the proposed Regional Entity Rule or Rule change with the Commission for approval. Any filing by the Electric Reliability Organization shall be accompanied by an explanation of the basis and purpose for the Rule or Rule change, together with a description of the proceedings conducted by the Electric Reliability Organization or Regional Entity to develop the proposal.
( b ) The Commission, upon its own motion or upon complaint, may propose a change to an Electric Reliability Organization Rule or Regional Entity Rule.
( c ) A proposed Electric Reliability Organization Rule or Rule change or Regional Entity Rule or Rule change shall take effect upon a finding by the Commission, after notice and opportunity for public comment, that the change is just, reasonable, not unduly discriminatory or preferential, is in the public interest, and satisfies the requirements of § 39.3.
§ 1317.110 Remedial and affirmative action and self-evaluation. ( a ) *Remedial action.* If the designated agency official finds that a recipient has discriminated against persons on the basis of sex in an education program or activity, such recipient shall take such remedial action as the designated agency official deems necessary to overcome the effects of such discrimination.
( b ) *Affirmative action.* In the absence of a finding of discrimination on the basis of sex in an education program or activity, a recipient may take affirmative action consistent with law to overcome the effects of conditions that resulted in limited participation therein by persons of a particular sex. Nothing in these Title IX regulations shall be interpreted to alter any affirmative action obligations that a recipient may have under Executive Order 11246, 3 CFR, 1964-1965 Comp., p. 339; as amended by Executive Order 11375, 3 CFR, 1966-1970 Comp., p. 684; as amended by Executive Order 11478, 3 CFR, 1966-1970 Comp., p. 803; as amended by Executive Order 12086, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 230; as amended by Executive Order 12107, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 264.
( c ) *Self-evaluation.* Each recipient education institution shall, within one year of September 29, 2000: ( 1 ) Evaluate, in terms of the requirements of these Title IX regulations, its current policies and practices and the effects thereof concerning admission of students, treatment of students, and employment of both academic and non-academic personnel working in connection with the recipient's education program or activity;
( 2 ) Modify any of these policies and practices that do not or may not meet the requirements of these Title IX regulations; and
( 3 ) Take appropriate remedial steps to eliminate the effects of any discrimination that resulted or may have resulted from adherence to these policies and practices.
( d ) *Availability of self-evaluation and related materials.* Recipients shall maintain on file for at least three years following completion of the evaluation required under paragraph (c) of this section, and shall provide to the designated agency official upon request, a description of any modifications made pursuant to paragraph (c)(2) of this section and of any remedial steps taken pursuant to paragraph (c)(3) of this section.
# C_2007096EN.01002703.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/27

---

Order of the President of the Fifth Chamber of the Court of 23 February 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Slovakia

(Case C-69/06) (1)

1

(2007/C 96/49)

Language of the case: Slovak

Language of the case: Slovak

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 74, 25.3.2006.

1

---
# Table 21 Macro List
# C_2011030EN.01005002.xml

| 29.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/50

---

Action brought on 29 November 2010 — Nordmilch v OHIM — Lactimilk (MILRAM)

(Case T-546/10)

()

2011/C 30/90

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Nordmilch AG (Bremen, Germany) (represented by: R. Schneider, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Lactimilk, SA (Madrid, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 15 September 2010 in Joined Cases R 1041/2009-4 and R 1053/2009-4, in so far as it refuses Community trade mark application 002 851 384 for certain goods in Classes 5 and 29; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 15 September 2010 in Joined Cases R 1041/2009-4 and R 1053/2009-4, in so far as it refuses Community trade mark application 002 851 384 for certain goods in Classes 5 and 29;

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant.

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘MILRAM’ for goods in Classes 5, 29, 30, 33, 33 and 43.

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Lactimilk, SA.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: National figurative mark containing the word element ‘RAM’ for goods in Classes 29, and various national word marks ‘RAM’ for goods in Classes 5, 29, 30 and 32.

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejection in part of the opposition.

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulment of the decision of the Opposition Division, in so far as the opposition in respect of certain goods was rejected and refusal of registration for the goods in question.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, (1) since there is no likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue. The applicant also claims that the Board of Appeal did not take account, in respect of an opposing mark, that its protection had expired at the time of the decision of 15 September 2010.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

1

---
### §634g. Budgetary line item and authorization of appropriations

#### (a) Appropriation requests

Each budget of the United States Government submitted by the President under section 1105 of title 31 shall include a separate statement of the amount of appropriations requested for the Office of Advocacy of the Small Business Administration, which shall be designated in a separate account in the General Fund of the Treasury.

#### (b) Administrative operations

The Administrator of the Small Business Administration shall provide the Office of Advocacy with appropriate and adequate office space at central and field office locations, together with such equipment, operating budget, and communications facilities and services as may be necessary, and shall provide necessary maintenance services for such offices and the equipment and facilities located in such offices.

#### (c) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as are necessary to carry out sections 634a to 634g of this title. Any amount appropriated under this subsection shall remain available, without fiscal year limitation, until expended.

(Pub. L. 94–305, title II, §207, as added Pub. L. 111–240, title I, §1602(b), Sept. 27, 2010, 124 Stat. 2551.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Small Business Act which comprises this chapter.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 634g, Pub. L. 94–305, title II, §207, June 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 671, related to authorization of appropriations, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 111–240, title I, §1602(b), Sept. 27, 2010, 124 Stat. 2551.
§ 375.202 Definitions and limitations on definitions. ( a ) *Definitions.* For purposes of this subpart: ( 1 ) *Meeting* means the deliberations of at least a quorum of the Commission where such deliberations determine or result in the joint conduct of official Commission business, except that such term does not include deliberations to determine whether to conduct a closed meeting.
( 2 ) *Portion of a meeting* means the consideration during a meeting of a particular topic or item separately identified in the notice of Commission meeting described in § 375.204.
( 3 ) *Open* when used in the context of a Commission meeting or a portion thereof, means the public may attend and observe the deliberations of the Commission during such meeting or portion of a meeting consistent with the provisions of § 375.203.
( 4 ) *Closed* when used in the context of a Commission meeting or a portion thereof, means that the public may not attend or observe the deliberations of the Commission during such meeting or portion of such meeting.
( b ) *Limitations on other definitions in this chapter.* For purposes of this subpart: ( 1 ) Transcripts, minutes and electronic recordings of Commission meetings (whether or not prepared at the direction of the Commission) are not part of the “formal record” as defined in § 388.101(c) of this chapter; and
( 2 ) Transcripts, minutes and electronic recordings of Commission meetings (whether or not prepared at the direction of the Commission) are not part of the “public record” of the Commission as defined in § 388.105(b)) of this chapter.
[45 FR 21217, Apr. 1, 1980, as amended by Order 225, 47 FR 19058, May 3, 1982]
Exhibit 23.1





                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-93447) and Form S-3 (No. 333-45962)
and in the related Prospectuses, of our report, dated January 17, 2003,
relating to the consolidated financial statements of Middleburg Financial
Corporation included in the 2002 Annual Report of Shareholders and incorporated
by reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2002.

          /s/ Yount, Hyde & Barbour, P.C.


Winchester, Virginia
March 14, 2003
Appendix 1. Inventory Spreadsheets for Data 

Packages Compiled for Each Area of Interest

Inventory spreadsheets for data packages compiled for each area of interest are included in the following folders:

Aynak Copper Cobalt Chromium AOI Inventories

Badakhshan Gold AOI Inventories

Baghlan Clay Gypsum AOI Inventories

Bakhud Fluorite AOI Inventories

Balkhab Copper AOI Inventories

Daykundi Tin Tungsten Inventories

Dudkash Industrial Minerals AOI Inventories

Dusar Shaida Copper Tin AOI Inventories

Ghunday Achin Magnesite Talc AOI Inventories

Haji Gak Iron AOI Inventories

Karnak Khanjar Mercury AOI Inventories

Katawas Gold AOI Inventories

Khanneshin Carbonatite AOI Inventories

Kundalan Copper Gold AOI Inventories

Kunduz Celestite AOI Inventories

Nalbandon Lead Zinc AOI Inventories

North Herat Barium Limestone AOI Inventories

North Takhar Gold Placer AOI Inventories

Nuristan Pegmatite AOI Inventories

Other summaries, etc

Panjsher Valley Emerald Iron Silver AOI Inventories

South Helmand Travertine AOI Inventories

Takhar Evaporite AOI Inventories

Tourmaline Tin AOI Inventories

Zarkashan Copper Gold AOI Inventories
# C_2010317EN.01003801.xml

| 20.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 317/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 317/38

---

Action brought on 16 September 2010 — Trefilerías Quijano v Commission

(Case T-427/10)

()

2010/C 317/69

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Trefilerías Quijano (Los Corrales de Buelna, Spain) (represented by E. González Díaz and A. Tresandri Blanco, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annulment pursuant to Article 263 of the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union of the decision of the European Commission of 30 June 2010 C(2010) 4387 final on a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU in Case COMP/38.344 — Prestressing steel; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annulment pursuant to Article 263 of the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union of the decision of the European Commission of 30 June 2010 C(2010) 4387 final on a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU in Case COMP/38.344 — Prestressing steel;

| — | or, in the alternative, annulment or reduction pursuant to Article 261 of the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union of the amount of the fine imposed by that decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

or, in the alternative, annulment or reduction pursuant to Article 261 of the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union of the amount of the fine imposed by that decision;

| — | an order that the Commission should pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

an order that the Commission should pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The decision challenged in these proceedings is the same as that in Case T-426/10 Moreda-Riviere Trefilerías v Commission.

Moreda-Riviere Trefilerías

Commission

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those raised in that case.

The applicant denies that it should be held liable for the alleged infringement of Article 101 TFEU.

---
### §§636 to 636h. Repealed. Pub. L. 92–181, title V, §5.26(a), Dec. 10, 1971, 85 Stat. 624

Section 636, acts May 12, 1933, ch. 25, title II, §40, 48 Stat. 51; Sept. 6, 1966, Pub. L. 89–554, §8(a), 80 Stat. 648, provided for organization of Farm Credit Administration. See section 2247 of this title.

Section 636a, act Aug. 6, 1953, ch. 335, §2, 67 Stat. 390, stated Congressional declaration of policy concerning agricultural credit. See section 2001 of this title.

Section 636a note, act Aug. 6, 1953, ch. 335, §1, 67 Stat. 390, provided that such act Aug. 6, 1953, should be known as "Farm Credit Act of 1953".

Section 636b, act Aug. 6, 1953, ch. 335, §3, 67 Stat. 390, covered the creation of Farm Credit Administration as an independent agency in executive branch. See section 2241 et seq. of this title.

Section 636c, acts Aug. 6, 1953, ch. 335, §4, 67 Stat. 390; Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 785, title IV, §402, 69 Stat. 666; Aug. 18, 1959, Pub. L. 86–168, title I, §104(h), 73 Stat. 387; Aug. 2, 1966, Pub. L. 89–525, §6, 80 Stat. 335, provided for creation of Federal Farm Credit Board. See section 2242 et seq. of this title.

Section 636d, act Aug. 6, 1953, ch. 335, §5, 67 Stat. 392; Aug. 18, 1959, Pub. L. 86–168, title I, §104(j), 73 Stat. 387; Oct. 4, 1961, Pub. L. 87–367, title III, §302(a), 75 Stat. 793, provided for position of Governor of Farm Credit Administration. See section 2244 et seq. of this title.

Section 636e, act Aug. 6, 1953, ch. 335, §6, 67 Stat. 393, covered duties of Federal Farm Credit Board. See section 2227 of this title.

Section 636f, acts Aug. 6, 1953, ch. 335, §7, 67 Stat. 393; Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 785, title I, §110(c), 69 Stat. 662; Oct. 4, 1961, Pub. L. 87–353, §3(n), 75 Stat. 774, provided for abolishment of certain offices and funds under program as it existed prior to 1953.

Section 636g, acts Aug. 6, 1953, ch. 335, §8, 67 Stat. 394; July 26, 1956, ch. 741, title I, §107(a), 70 Stat. 666; Aug. 18, 1959, Pub. L. 86–168, title I, §104(h), 73 Stat. 387, authorized delegation of powers to institutions in farm credit districts.

Section 636h, act Aug. 6, 1953, ch. 335, §17(b), 67 Stat. 399, covered administrative expenditures of Farm Credit Administration. See section 2249 of this title.
#### Aaron Mosher, Appellant, and Michelle Speziale, Respondent, v Schneider National Carriers, Inc., et al., Appellants.

[823 NYS2d 730]

Appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Frank A. Sedita, Jr., J.), entered December 27, 2005 in a personal injury action. The order, among other things, denied the motion of defendants for summary judgment dismissing the complaint of plaintiff Michelle Speziale.

Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation discontinuing appeal signed by the attorneys for the parties on July 6, 2006,

It is hereby ordered that said appeals be and the same hereby are unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation. Present—Hurlbutt, A.RJ, Kehoe, Smith and Green, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 49 (Monday, March 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 13675]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5734]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Committee Management; Notice of Establishment

    The Director of the National Science Foundation has determined that 
the establishment of the U.S. Antarctic Program Blue Ribbon Panel is 
necessary and in the public interest in connection with the performance 
of duties imposed upon the National Science Foundation (NSF), by 42 
U.S.C. 1861 et seq. This determination follows consultation with the 
Committee Management Secretariat, General Services Administration.
    Name of Committee: U.S. Antarctic Program Blue Ribbon Panel 
(<greek-i>76826).
    Purpose: The Panel will conduct an independent review of the 
current U.S. Antarctic Program to ensure the nation is pursing the best 
twenty-year trajectory for conducting science and diplomacy in 
Antarctica. The Panel will aim to identify and characterize a range of 
options for supporting and implementing the required national 
scientific endeavors, international collaborations and strong U.S. 
presence in Antarctica. The Panel will examine the appropriate amount 
of R&D and complementary scientific activities needed to make Antarctic 
activities most productive and affordable over the long term, as well 
as appropriate opportunities for international collaboration.
    Responsible NSF Official: Karl Erb, Director, Office of Polar 
Programs, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, 
Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: 703/292-8030.

     Dated: March 9, 2011.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-5734 Filed 3-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
# C_2011226EN.01001002.xml

| 30.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 226/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 226/10

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 14 April 2011 — HIT hoteli, igralnice, turizem d.d. Nova Gorica and HIT LARIX, prirejanje posebnih iger na sreco in turizem d.d. v Bundesminister für Finanzen

(Case C-176/11)

2011/C 226/18

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Verwaltungsgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: HIT hoteli, igralnice, turizem d.d. Nova Gorica and HIT LARIX, prirejanje posebnih iger na sreco in turizem d.d.

Applicants:

Defendant: Bundesminister für Finanzen

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Is a rule of national law which permits the domestic advertising of casinos located outside the national territory only where the legal protection for gamblers in those foreign locations corresponds to the protection under domestic law compatible with the freedom to provide services?

---
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 May 15, 2009
    By:
    /s/ Rocco B. CommissoRocco B. CommissoChairman and Chief Executive OfficerBy:
    /s/ Mark E. StephanMark E. StephanExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer