CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST (Electronic Format)

*** TO BE COMPLETED BY DISTRICT AND RETURNED TO ARB ***

All rules submitted to the EPA as State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions must be supported by certain information

an d documentation for the rule packages to be deemed complete for review by the EPA. Rules will not be evaluated for
approvability by the EPA unless the submittal packages are complete. To assist you in determining that all necessary

materials are included in rules packages sent to the ARB for submittal to the EPA, please fill out the following form and include it with the rule package you send ARB. See the ARB's Guidelines on the Implementation of the 40 CFR 51,

Appendix V , for a more detailed explanation than is provided here. Adopted rules and rule amendments should be checked against U.S. EPA's Guidance Document for Correcting Common VOC & Other Rule Deficiencies (Little Blue Book, August 21, 2001) to ensure that they contain no elements which will res ult in disapproval by EPA.

District: San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District

Rule No: 4694

Rule Title: Wine Fermentation and Storage Tanks

Date Adopted or Amended: Rule Origi nally Adopted 12

- 15

- 05 ; SIP Submittal Amendment approved August 18, 2011

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS

Note: All documents should be in electronic format. Items that have signatures, initials, or stamps may be scanned.

Not

Attached Attached N/A

COMPLETE COPY OF THE RULE: Provide an unmarked copy of the entire
rule as adopted or amended by your District Board.

UNDERLINE AND STRIKEOUT COPY OF THE RULE : If an amended rule,

provide a complete copy of the rule indicating in underline and strikeout format

all language which has been added, deleted, or changed since the rule was

last adopted or amended.

COMPLETE COPY OF THE REFERENCED RULE(S): For any rule which includes language specifically referencing another rule, a copy of that other
rule must also be submitted, unless it has already been submitted to EPA as part of a previous SIP submit tal.

PUBLIC NOTICE EVIDENCE: Include a copy of the local newspaper clipping certification(s), stating the date of publication, which must be at least 30 days before the hearing. As an alternative, include a copy of the actual published notice of the public hearing as it appeared in the local newspaper(s). In this case, however, enough of the newspaper page must be included to show the date of publication. The notice must specifically identify by ti tle and number
each rule adopted or amended.

RESOLUTION/MINUTE ORDER: Provide the Board Clerk certified resolution or minute order. This document must include certification that the hearing

was hel d in accordance with the information in the public notice. It must also list the rules that were adopted or amended, the date of the public hearing, and a statement of compliance with California Health and Safety Code

Sections 40725

- 40728 (Administrative Procedures Act).

PUBLIC COMMENTS AND RESPONSES: Submit copies of written public
comments made during the notice period and at the public hearing. Also submit any written responses prepared by the D istrict staff or presented to the District Board at the public hearing. A summary of the public comments and responses is adequate. If there were no comments made during the notice period or at the hearing, please indicate N/A to the left.5/1/2002 CALIFORNIA AI R RESOURCES BOARD



### SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST (Electronic Format)

TECHNICAL MATERIALS

Not

Attached Attached N/A

RULE EVALUATION FORM: See instructions for completing the Rule

Evaluation Form a nd the accompanying sample form.

NON

- EPA TEST METHODS: Attach all test methods that are referenced in your rule that do not appear in 40 CFR 51, 60, 61, 63, or have not been
previously submitted to EPA. EPA methods used in other media such as SW846 for solid waste are not automatically approved for air pollution applications. Submittal of test methods that are not EPA

- approved should include the information and follow the procedure described in Reg ion 9’s “Test

Method Review & Evaluation Process.”

MODELING SUPPORT: Provide if appropriate. In general, modeling support is not required for VOC and NOx rules to determine their impacts on ozone

l evels. Modeling is required where a rule is a relaxation that affects large sources ( > 100 TPY) in an attainment area for SO2, directly emitted PM10, CO, or NOx (for NO2 purposes). In cases where EPA is concerned with the impact on air quality of rule re visions which relax limits or cause a shift in emission patterns in a nonattainment area, a reference back to the approved SIP will be sufficient provided the approved SIP accounts for the relaxation and provided the approved SIP used the current EPA model ing guidelines. If
current EPA modeling guidelines were not used, then new modeling may be
required.

ECONOMIC AND TECHNICAL JUSTIFICATION FOR DEVIATIONS FROM

EPA POLICIES : The District staff report or other information included with the submittal should discuss all potential relaxations or deviations from RACT, RACM, BACT, BACM, enforceability, attainment, RFP, or other relevant EPA requirements. This includes, for example, demonstrating that exemp tions or emission limits less stringent than the presumptive RACT (e.g., a CTG) meet EPA’s 5 percent policy, and demonstrating that all source categories exempted from a RACM/BACM rule are de minimus according to EPA’s RACM/BACM policy.

ADDITIONAL MATERIALS : Provide District staff reports and any other supporting information concerning development of the rule or rule changes. This information should explain the basis for all limits and thresholds

c ontained in the rule.