alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE ENCAD,
INC. DECEMBER 31, 1998 FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             586
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,063
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     16,205
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                55,107
<PP&E>                                          27,905
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,301
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  72,143
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,787
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                      47,531
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    72,143
<SALES>                                        110,055
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               110,055
<CGS>                                           80,646
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   80,646
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                53,077
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 412
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (23,081)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,775)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (18,306)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (18,306)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.58)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2011204EN.01001203.xml

| 9.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 204/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 204/12

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main (Germany) lodged on 28 March 2011 — Condor Flugdienst GmbH v Jürgen Dörschel

(Case C-151/11)

2011/C 204/23

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Landgericht Frankfurt am Main

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Condor Flugdienst GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Jürgen Dörschel

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Does a passenger have a right to payment of compensation under Article 7 of Regulation No 261/2004 (1) in the case where the flight, following its departure according to schedule, is discontinued and the aircraft, before arriving at the airport of destination, returns to the airport of departure and subsequently takes off again with a delay which is relevant for payment of compensation? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does a passenger have a right to payment of compensation under Article 7 of Regulation No 261/2004 (1) in the case where the flight, following its departure according to schedule, is discontinued and the aircraft, before arriving at the airport of destination, returns to the airport of departure and subsequently takes off again with a delay which is relevant for payment of compensation?

1

| 2. | Is there a discontinuance in the case where, after the aircraft doors have been closed, the journey is not continued? From what point is there a discontinuance of the start, rather than a delayed start? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is there a discontinuance in the case where, after the aircraft doors have been closed, the journey is not continued? From what point is there a discontinuance of the start, rather than a delayed start?

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91, OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,705,831
<SECURITIES>                                   114,359
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,338,611
<ALLOWANCES>                                    87,500
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,684,252
<PP&E>                                       1,948,371
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,816,062
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,751,187
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          733,600
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        56,069
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,961,518
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,751,187
<SALES>                                     28,533,083
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            28,533,083
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               25,130,413
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (191,021)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             175,536
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,418,155
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,406,810
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,011,345
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,011,345
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.32
        

</TABLE>
### §794. Energy conservation study

#### (a) Study of conservation methods

The Federal Energy Administrator shall conduct a study on potential methods of energy conservation and, not later than six months after June 22, 1974, shall submit to Congress a report on the results of such study. The study shall include, but not be limited to, the following:

(1) the energy conservation potential of restricting exports of fuels or energy-intensive products, or goods, including an analysis of balance-of-payments and foreign relations implications of any such restrictions;

(2) alternative requirements, incentives, or disincentives for increasing industrial recycling and resource recovery in order to reduce energy demand, including the economic costs and fuel consumption tradeoff which may be associated with such recycling and resource recovery in lieu of transportation and use of virgin materials; and

(3) means for incentives or disincentives to increase efficiency of industrial use of energy.

#### (b) Emergency mass transportation assistance plan

Within ninety days of June 22, 1974, the Secretary of Transportation, after consultation with the Federal Energy Administrator, shall submit to the Congress for appropriate action an "Emergency Mass Transportation Assistance Plan" for the purpose of conserving energy by expanding and improving public mass transportation systems and encouraging increased ridership as alternatives to automobile travel.

#### (c) Recommendations in plan

Such plan shall include, but shall not be limited to—

(1) recommendations for emergency temporary grants to assist States and local public bodies and agencies thereof in the payment of operating expenses incurred in connection with the provision of expanded mass transportation service in urban areas;

(2) recommendations for additional emergency assistance for the purchase of buses and rolling stock for fixed rail, including the feasibility of accelerating the timetable for such assistance under section 142(a)(2) of title 23 for the purpose of providing additional capacity for and encouraging increased use of public mass transportation systems;

(3) recommendations for a program of demonstration projects to determine the feasibility of fare-free and low-fare urban mass transportation systems, including reduced rates for elderly and handicapped persons during nonpeak hours of transportation;

(4) recommendations for additional emergency assistance for the construction of fringe and transportation corridor parking facilities to serve bus and other mass transportation passengers;

(5) recommendations on the feasibility of providing tax incentives for persons who use public mass transportation systems.

(Pub. L. 93–319, §8, June 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 260.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

Federal Energy Administration terminated and functions vested by law in Administrator thereof transferred to Secretary of Energy (unless otherwise specifically provided) by sections 7151(a) and 7293 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.
MODIFY and AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed June 6, 2016.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-15-01301-CR

JATERRIAN DIQUAN TAYLOR, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 203rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F14-76025-P

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Lang-Miers, Evans, and Brown

Opinion by Justice Lang-Miers

Jaterrian Diquan Taylor waived a jury and pleaded guilty to aggravated robbery of person 

65 years or older. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 29.03(a)(3)(A) (West 2011). The trial court 

assessed punishment at twenty years’ imprisonment. On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief 

in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the 

requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional 

evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See 

High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–12 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a 

copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he 

did not file a pro se response. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–21 (Tex. Crim. App. 

2014) (identifying duties of appellate courts and counsel in Anders cases).
–2–

We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 

826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree 

the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably 

support the appeal.

Although not an arguable issue, we note the trial court’s judgment incorrectly reflects there 

was a plea bargain agreement. The record reflects appellant entered an open plea of guilty to the 

charges in the indictment. Accordingly, we modify the section of the judgment entitled “terms of 

plea bargain” to state “open.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(b); Bigley v. State, 865 S.W.2d 26, 27–28 

(Tex. Crim. App. 1993); Asberry v. State, 813 S.W.2d 526, 529–30 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1991, pet. 

ref'd).

As modified, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Do Not Publish

TEX. R. APP. P. 47

151301F.U05

/Elizabeth Lang-Miers/

ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS

JUSTICE
–3–

Court of Appeals

S

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

JATERRIAN DIQUAN TAYLOR, 

Appellant

No. 05-15-01301-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 203rd Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F14-76025-P.

Opinion delivered by Justice Lang-Miers. 

Justices Evans and Brown participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is MODIFIED

as follows:

The section entitled “Terms of Plea Bargain” is modified to show “Open.”

As modified, we AFFIRM the trial court’s judgment.

Judgment entered this 6th day of June, 2016.
**Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 December 2011 – Stichting Woonlinie and Others v Commission**

**(Case T-202/10)**

State aid – Scheme of aid granted by the Netherlands to housing corporations – Existing aid – Decision accepting Member State’s commitments – Action for annulment – Not individually concerned – Inadmissibility

Actions for annulment – Natural or legal persons – Measures of direct and individual concern to them – Commission decision declaring modifications to an existing aid scheme concerning the general system of financing housing
corporations compatible with the internal market – Access to the aid scheme opened on the basis of objective criteria and without limitation as to the number of potential beneficiaries
– Action of a company eligible for that scheme – Inadmissibility (Art. 263, fourth para., TFEU) (see paras 23-24, 26-28, 32-33, 43)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | APPLICATION for partial annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 9963 final of 15 December 2009 relating to State aid E 2/2005 and N 642/2009 (Netherlands) – Existing and special project aid to housing corporations. |

**Operative part**

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | There is no need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene of Vesteda Groep BV, the Netherlands Vereniging van Institutionele Beleggers in Vastgoed, the Société wallonne du logement, the Union sociale pour l’habitat and The European Liaison Committee for Social Housing (Cecodhas). |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3. | | Stichting Woonlinie, Stichting Allee Wonen, Woningstichting Volksbelang, Stichting WoonInvest and Stichting Woonstede are ordered to bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 4. | | Vesteda Groep, the Netherlands Vereniging van Institutionele Beleggers in Vastgoed, the Société wallonne du logement, the Union sociale pour l’habitat and Cecodhas, applicants for leave to intervene, are ordered to bear their own costs. |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements of The Smithfield Companies,
Inc. for the nine months ended December 31, 1996, and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       8,004,317
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,799,807
<ALLOWANCES>                                    69,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,946,917
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,915,691
<PP&E>                                       6,262,871
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,179,235
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,755,853
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,458,764
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,007,611
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,289,478
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,755,853
<SALES>                                     15,908,172
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,990,708
<CGS>                                       10,603,569
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,976,094
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,231,474
<INCOME-TAX>                                   406,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            825,474
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   825,474
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .63
        

</TABLE>
### §9022. Flexibility in paying reimbursement

The Secretary of Labor may issue clarifying guidance to allow States to interpret their State unemployment compensation laws in a manner that would provide maximum flexibility to reimbursing employers as it relates to timely payment and assessment of penalties and interest pursuant to such State laws.

(Pub. L. 116–136, div. A, title II, §2103(a), Mar. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 317.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE  SHEET AND THE  CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENT OF INCOME FILED AS
PART OF THE  ANNUAL  REPORT ON FORM 10-K AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1996
<CASH>                                             104
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,032
<ALLOWANCES>                                       725
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,663
<PP&E>                                          49,159
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,625
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  67,861
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,617
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            62
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,773
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    67,861
<SALES>                                         49,352
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                49,352
<CGS>                                           24,049
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,049
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   232
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,262
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,676
<INCOME-TAX>                                       862
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                814
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       814
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13
        

</TABLE>
§ 9407.4 Notice of meetings. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided in this section, the Commission shall make a public announcement at least seven days prior to a meeting.
( b ) The public announcement shall include: ( 1 ) The time and place of the meeting;
( 2 ) The subject matter of the meeting;
( 3 ) Whether the meeting is to be open, closed, or portions of a meeting will be closed;
( 4 ) Whether public participation will be allowed; and
( 5 ) The name and telephone number of the person who will respond to requests for information about the meeting.
( c ) The public announcement requirement shall be implemented by: ( 1 ) Publishing the announcement on the Commission's Web site; and
( 2 ) Distributing the announcement to affected government entities and persons and organizations that the Executive Director determines may have an interest in the subject matter of the meeting.
( d ) The announcement will be submitted for publication in the Federal Register immediately following the public posting and distribution noted in paragraph (c) of this section.
( e ) A meeting may be held with less than seven days notice if a majority of the Commission determines by recorded vote that the business of the Commission so requires. The Commission shall make a public announcement to this effect at the earliest practicable time. The announcement shall include the information required by paragraph (b) of this section and shall be issued in accordance with those procedures set forth in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section that are practicable given the available period of time.
( f ) The subject matter of an announced meeting or the determination of the Commission to open or close a meeting or portions of a meeting to public observation may be changed only if: ( 1 ) A majority of the Commissioners determine by a recorded vote that agency business so requires and that no earlier announcement of the change was possible,
( 2 ) The Commission publicly announces the change and the vote of each Commissioner upon such change at the earliest practicable time.
( 3 ) The announcement of the change noted in paragraph (f)(2) of this section is issued in accordance with those procedures set forth in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section that are practicable given the available period of time.
( g ) The time or place of an announced meeting may be changed only if a public announcement of the change is made at the earliest practicable time. The announcement shall be issued in accordance with those procedures set forth in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section that are practicable given the available period of time.
§ 385.411 Sanctions (Rule 411). ( a ) *Disobedience of order compelling discovery.* If a participant or any other person fails to obey an order compelling discovery, the presiding officer may, after notice to the participant or person and an opportunity to be heard, take one or more of the following actions, but may not dismiss or otherwise terminate the proceeding: ( 1 ) Certify the matter to the Commission with a recommendation for dismissal or termination of the proceeding, termination of that participant's right to participate in the proceeding, institution of civil action, or any other sanction available to the Commission by law;
( 2 ) Order that the matters to which the order compelling discovery relates are taken as established for the purposes of the proceeding in accordance with the position of the participant obtaining the order;
( 3 ) Order that a participant be precluded from supporting or opposing such positions or introducing such matters in evidence as the presiding officer designates;
( 4 ) Order that all or part of any pleading by a participant be struck or that the proceeding or a phase of the proceeding be stayed until the order compelling discovery is obeyed; and
( 5 ) Recommend to the Commission that it take action under Rule 2102 against a representative of the participant if the presiding officer believes that the representative has engaged in unethical or improper professional conduct.
( b ) *Against representative of a participant.* If the person disobeying an order compelling discovery is an agent, officer, employee, attorney, partner, or director of a participant, the presiding officer may take any of the actions described in paragraph (a) against that participant.