Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 50 / Tuesday, March 15, 2011 / Notices 13983 

injury determination in the Federal 

Register. 

Antidumping Duty Order 

On March 9, 2011, in accordance with 

section 735(d) of the Act, the ITC 

notified the Department of its final 

determination that an industry in the 

United States is materially injured 

within the meaning of section 

735(b)(1)(A)(i) of the Act by reason of 

less-than-fair-value imports of PVA from 

Taiwan. 

In accordance with section 736(a)(1) 

of the Act, the Department will direct 

CBP to assess, upon further instruction 

by the Department, antidumping duties 

equal to the amount by which the 

normal value of the merchandise 

exceeds U.S. price of the merchandise 

for all relevant entries of PVA from 

Taiwan. These antidumping duties will 

be assessed on all unliquidated entries 

of PVA from Taiwan entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after September 13, 

2010, the date on which the Department 

published its notice of preliminary 

determination in the Federal Register, 

excluding those entries entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption between March 13, 2011 

(the day following the end of the 

provisional-measures period), and the 

day preceding the publication date of 

the ITC’s final injury determination in 

the Federal Register. See Preliminary 

Results, 75 FR at 55552. 

Effective on the date of publication of 

the ITC’s notice of final determination 

in the Federal Register, CBP will 

require, pursuant to section 736(a)(3) of 

the Act and at the same time as 

importers would normally deposit 

estimated duties on subject 

merchandise, a cash deposit equal to the 

estimated weighted-average 

antidumping margins listed below. 

Upon further instruction by the 

Department and in accordance with 

section 736(a)(1) of the Act, the 

Department will instruct CBP to assess 

antidumping duties equal to the amount 

by which the normal value of the 

merchandise exceeds U.S. price of the 

merchandise for all relevant entries of 

PVA from Taiwan. These antidumping 

duties will be assessed on all 

unliquidated entries of PVA entered 

from Taiwan, or withdrawn from 

warehouse, for consumption on or after 

the date of publication of the ITC’s 

notice of final determination in the 

Federal Register. 

Producer or exporter 

Weightedaverage 

margin 

Chang Chun Petrochemical 

Co., Ltd ................................. 3.08 

All Others .................................. 3.08 

This notice constitutes the 

antidumping duty order with respect to 

PVA from Taiwan pursuant to section 

736(a) of the Act. Interested parties may 

contact the Central Records Unit of the 

main Department of Commerce 

building, Room 7046, for copies of an 

updated list of antidumping duty orders 

currently in effect. 

This order is published in accordance 

with section 736(a) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.211(b). 

Dated: March 9, 2011. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2011–6004 Filed 3–14–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–831] 

Fresh Garlic from the People’s 

Republic of China: Court Decision Not 

in Harmony With Final Results and 

Amended Final Results of Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On March 1, 2011, the United 

States Court of International Trade 

(‘‘CIT’’) sustained in an unpublished 

judgment the Department of 

Commerce’s (‘‘the Department’’) final 

results of redetermination as applied to 

respondent Shenzhen Greening Trading 

Co., Ltd. (‘‘Greening’’) pursuant to the 

CIT’s order granting the Department’s 

voluntary remand request in Shandong 

Chenhe International Trading Co., Ltd. 

and Shenzhen Greening Trading Co., 

Ltd. v. United States, Court No. 09– 

00246 (Ct. Int’l Trade April 22, 2010). 

See Final Results of Redetermination 

Pursuant to Voluntary Remand, Court 

No. 09–00246, dated July 30, 2010, 

available at http://ia.ita.doc.gov/ 

remands (‘‘Remand Results’’); Shandong 

Chenhe International Trading Co., Ltd. 

and Shenzhen Greening Trading Co., 

Ltd. v. United States, Court No. 09– 

00246 (Ct. Int’l Trade March 1, 2011) 

(‘‘Judgment’’). Consistent with the 

decision of the United States Court of 

Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

(‘‘CAFC’’) in Timken Co. v. United 

States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir. 1990) 

(‘‘Timken’’), as clarified by Diamond 

Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. United 

States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) 

(‘‘Diamond Sawblades’’), the Department 

is notifying the public that the final 

judgment in this case is not in harmony 

with the Department’s final results and 

is amending the final results of the 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on fresh garlic 

from the People’s Republic of China 

(‘‘PRC’’) covering the period of review 

(‘‘POR’’) of November 1, 2006, through 

October 31, 2007 with respect to 

Greening. See Fresh Garlic From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results and Partial Rescission of the 

13th Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and New Shipper Reviews, 74 

FR 29174 (June 19, 2009) (‘‘Final 

Results’’), and accompanying Issues and 

Decision Memorandum at Comment 11. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 11, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Scott Lindsay or David Lindgren, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office 6, Import 

Administration—International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC, 20230; 

telephone (202) 482–0780 or (202) 482– 

3870. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On June 19, 2009, the Department 

issued its Final Results, where it 

determined that neither Shandong 

Chenhe International Trading Co., Ltd. 

(‘‘Chenhe’’) nor Greening submitted a 

separate rate application or certification, 

and neither company informed the 

Department that they had no shipments 

of subject merchandise during the POR 

within the deadlines provided in the 

separate rate applications and 

certifications. See Final Results and 

accompanying Issues and Decision 

Memorandum at Comment 11. 

Accordingly, for the six months of the 

POR not covered by the concurrently 

conducted new shipper review (‘‘NSR’’), 

we determined that Chenhe and 

Greening had not established that they 

were each entitled to a separate rate, 

and without timely filed no-shipment 

certifications, Chenhe and Greening 

should be deemed to be part of the PRCwide entity. Id. See also Fresh Garlic 

from the People’s Republic of China: 

Initiation of Antidumping Duty New 

Shipper Reviews, 72 FR 38057 (July 12, 

2007). 

Chenhe and Greening timely 

challenged the Department’s 

determination not to rescind the 

administrative review with respect to 

both companies to the CIT. On April 22, 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
13984 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 50 / Tuesday, March 15, 2011 / Notices 

2009, the CIT granted the United States’ 

motion for voluntary remand to 

reconsider whether the separate rate 

application or other relevant judicial or 

administrative precedent support a 

finding that Chenhe and Greening were 

on notice that they were required to 

submit, within a set deadline, a 

certification that they had no shipments 

during the POR in order for the 

Department to consider rescinding the 

administrative review as to both 

companies. 

On July 30, 2010, the Department 

issued its final results of 

redetermination. See Remand Results. 

In the redetermination, the Department 

reconsidered the specific circumstances 

surrounding Chenhe’s and Greening’s 

no-shipment certifications and 

rescinded the administrative review for 

both Chenhe and Greening, pending 

affirmance by the CIT. Id. On February 

16, 2011, Chenhe moved to dismiss, 

with prejudice, its complaint and the 

CIT granted the motion on February 18, 

2011. Subsequently, on March 1, 2011, 

the CIT sustained the Department’s 

remand redetermination with respect to 

Greening. See Judgment. 

Timken Notice 

In its decision in Timken, 893 F.2d at 

341, as clarified by Diamond Sawblades, 

the CAFC has held that, pursuant to 

section 516A(e) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (‘‘Act’’), the 

Department must publish a notice of a 

court decision that is not ‘‘in harmony’’ 

with a Department determination and 

must suspend liquidation of entries 

pending a ‘‘conclusive’’ court decision. 

The CIT’s March 1, 2011 Judgment 

sustaining the Department’s Remand 

Results with respect to Greening 

constitutes a final decision of that court 

that is not in harmony with the 

Department’s Final Results. This notice 

is published in fulfillment of the 

publication requirements of Timken. 

The cash deposit rate will remain the 

company-specific rate established for 

the subsequent and most recent period 

during which Greening was reviewed. 

See Fresh Garlic from the People’s 

Republic of China: Final Results and 

Partial Rescission of the 14th 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, 75 FR 34976 (June 21, 2010). 

However, because Greening had no 

shipments during the POR not covered 

by the NSR, there are no entries to 

suspend during the administrative 

review POR and, therefore, the 

Department does not find it necessary to 

instruct United States Customs and 

Border Protection to continue to 

suspend the liquidation of entries 

pending a ‘‘conclusive’’ court decision. 

Amended Final Results 

Because there is now a final court 

decision with respect to Greening, the 

Department amends its Final Results, 

and is rescinding its review of Greening 

for the administrative review POR. See 

Judgment; Remand Results. 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 516A(e)(1), 

751(a)(1), and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: March 9, 2011. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2011–5918 Filed 3–11–11; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Institute of Standards and 

Technology 

Cloud Computing Forum & Workshop 

III 

AGENCY: National Institute of Standards 

and Technology (NIST), Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of public workshop. 

SUMMARY: NIST announces the Cloud 

Computing Forum & Workshop III to be 

held on April 7 and 8, 2011. The event 

will include keynotes from the U.S. 

Chief Information Officer, NIST Under 

Secretary of Commerce for Standards 

and Technology, and other key federal 

officials. This workshop will provide 

information on the NIST strategic and 

tactical Cloud Computing program, 

including progress on the NIST efforts 

to advance open standards in 

interoperability, portability and security 

in cloud computing. The goals of this 

workshop are to present updates on: 

The NIST U.S. Government (USG) 

Cloud Computing Technology 

Roadmap; a series of high-value target 

U.S. Government Agency Cloud 

Computing Business Use Cases; a first 

version of a neutral cloud computing 

reference architecture and taxonomy; 

the NIST Standards Roadmap and the 

Standards Acceleration to Jumpstart the 

Adoption of Cloud Computing 

(SAJACC) process; and progress by the 

NIST Cloud Computing Security 

working group. The event will also 

include panels focusing on Cloud 

Computing across the Federal landscape 

as well as broad private sector topics. 

DATES: The Cloud Computing Forum & 

Workshop III will be held April 7 and 

8, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: The event will be held at 

the National Institute of Standards and 

Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, 

Gaithersburg, MD 20899 in the Red 

Auditorium of the Administration 

Building, Building 101. All visitors to 

the NIST site are required to pre-register 

to be admitted and have appropriate 

government-issued photo ID to gain 

entry to NIST. Anyone wishing to attend 

this meeting must register at http://

www.nist.gov/itl/cloud/

cloudworkshopiii.cfm by close of 

business Monday, March 28, 2011, in 

order to attend. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

further information contact Robert Bohn 

by e-mail at robert.bohn@nist.gov or by 

phone at (301) 975–4500. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 

20, 2010, NIST hosted the first Cloud 

Computing Forum & Workshop. The 

purpose of that initial workshop was to 

respond to the request of the Federal 

Chief Information Officer to NIST to 

lead Federal efforts on standards for 

data portability, cloud interoperability, 

and security. The workshop’s goals were 

to initiate engagement with industry to 

accelerate the development of cloud 

standards for interoperability, 

portability, and security; introduce 

NIST Cloud Computing efforts; and 

discuss the Federal Government’s 

experience with cloud computing. 

The purpose of the second Cloud 

Computing Forum & Workshop II, on 

November 4 and 5, 2010, was to report 

on the status of the efforts and to 

socialize the NIST strategy to 

collaboratively develop a Cloud 

Computing Roadmap among multiple 

Federal and industrial stakeholders, and 

to advance a dialogue between these 

groups. Panel discussions considered 

the roles of standard organizations and 

ad-hoc standards in the cloud; need and 

use of a reference architecture to 

support cloud adoption; key cloud 

computing issues and proposed 

solutions; security in the cloud; and 

international aspects of cloud 

computing. Breakout sessions on the 

following day, November 5, actively 

engaged stakeholders, discussed these 

issues, and developed a series of next 

steps for the effort in cloud computing 

standards. NIST led and stake-holder 

driven working groups in Standards, 

Security, Reference Architecture and 

Taxonomy, Target USG Agency 

Business Use Cases and SAJACC were 

formed. 

The purpose of the Cloud Computing 

Forum & Workshop III is to elaborate on 

the progress of the NIST USG Cloud 

Computing Technology Roadmap 

through the activities of the NIST led, 

stake-holder driven working groups that 

were formed during the November 2010 

event. The progress of these groups will 

be presented over a two-day span. Panel 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES