alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 16-14707

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 3:14-cr-00101-TJC-JRK-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

 versus

CEDRIC LEVAR BROWN, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(March 17, 2017)

Before TJOFLAT, WILLIAM PRYOR and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Case: 16-14707 Date Filed: 03/17/2017 Page: 1 of 2 
2

Charles Truncale, appoint counsel for Cedric Levar Brown, has filed a 

motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record 

reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. 

Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issue of 

merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Brown’s conviction and 

sentence are AFFIRMED. 

Case: 16-14707 Date Filed: 03/17/2017 Page: 2 of 2
HELP THEM SUCCEED ON AND 

OFF THE COURT.

Empower young people to make good choices about alcohol.

Being prepared to talk to young people about the risks of underage drinking and 

answer questions will show that you care about their overall health and wellness. 

For tips on how—and when—to begin the conversation, visit 

www.underagedrinking.samhsa.gov

#TalkTheyHearYou PEP20-03-01-011
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302





I, Teodoro F. Franco L. , certify that:





1. I have reviewed this Quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Family Healthcare Solutions, Inc. ;





2. Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Quarterly report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly report;





4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:





a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Quarterlyreport is being prepared;





b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this Quarterlyreport (the "Evaluation Date"); and





c) presented in this Quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;





5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and





b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and





6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this Quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.





Dated: May 17, 2004





|/s/Teodoro F. Franco L.                   
|------------------------------------------
|Teodoro F. Franco L.
Sole Officer/Director
MICHAEL STEVE COX, 

Petitioner, 

vs. 

THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN 

AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WHITE PINE, 

Respondent. 

MICHAEL STEVE COX, 

Petitioner, 

vs. 

THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN 

AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WHITE PINE, 

Respondent. 

No. 62079 

No. 62080 

ORDER DENYING WRIT PETITIONS 

These are seven original proper person petitions for 

extraordinary relief. The petitions are not consolidated. 

Having considered these petitions and supporting documents, 

we conclude that petitioner's arguments lack merit and that our 

intervention by way of extraordinary relief is not warranted. Accordingly, 

we deny the petitions. NRAP 21(b)(1); NRAP 21(c). 

Additionally, as demonstrated by the this order, petitioner has 

filed numerous meritless proper person petitions in this court seeking 

extraordinary writ relief and has further filed a number of similarly 

meritless appeals in this court. See Cox v. McDaniel, Docket No. 60056, 

Cox v. McDaniel, Docket No. 60151, Cox v. Bannister, Docket No. 60637, 

Cox v. State, Docket No. 61322. We caution appellant that continued filing 

of such meritless petitions and appeals may result in restrictions on his 

ability to file papers in this court in forma pauperis. See Jordan v. State, 

Dept. of Motor Vehicles & Pub. Safety, 121 Nev. 44, 110 P.3d 30 (2005), 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2 
abrogated on other grounds by Buzz Stew, LLC v. City of N. Las Vegas, 124 

Nev. 224, 181 P.3d 670 (2008). 

It is so ORDERED. 1 

Hardesty 

Parraguirre 

Ovut 

Cherry 

cc: Hon. James Todd Russell, District Judge 

Michael Steve Cox 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Carson City Clerk 

White Pine County Clerk 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

'In each of these writ petitions, this court has received petitioner's 

requests for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We direct the clerk of this 

court to file the May 17, 2011, and the June 28, 2011, motions in Docket 

No. 58292; the March 19, 2012, motion in Docket No. 60404; the March 19, 

2012, motion in Docket No. 60406; the March 19, 2012, motion in Docket 

No. 60407; the March 19, 2012, motion in Docket No. 60409; the November 

20, 2012, motion in Docket No. 62079; and the November 20, 2012, motion 

in Docket No. 62080. Because petitioner was granted leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis in each of these writ petitions, no action is required on 

these motions. 

3
### §6506. Review

Not later than 5 years after the effective date of the regulations initially issued under section 6502 of this title, the Commission shall—

(1) review the implementation of this chapter, including the effect of the implementation of this chapter on practices relating to the collection and disclosure of information relating to children, children's ability to obtain access to information of their choice online, and on the availability of websites directed to children; and

(2) prepare and submit to Congress a report on the results of the review under paragraph (1).

(Pub. L. 105–277, div. C, title XIII, §1307, Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–735.)
Exhibit 20.1
                                                       ------------

Chase Manhattan Grantor Trust 1995-A

From: The Chase Manhattan Bank

To:   Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.


                   MONTHLY CERTIFICATEHOLDER'S REPORT
                   ----------------------------------

Due Period 23 Beginning Date                     07/01/1997
Due Period 23 End Date                           07/31/1997
Determination Date                               08/08/1997
Remittance Date                                  08/15/1997


I.    Monthly Principal and Principal Carryover Shortfall to Certificateholders
      (Per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                  $ 22.0570771459

II.   Monthly Interest and Unpaid Interest to Certificateholders
      (Per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                   $ 1.7864729463

III.  Monthly Expenses Summary

      A. Servicing Fee Disbursement                                $ 446,719.37
      B. Cash Collateral Account Expense                                 $ 0.00
      C. Total Expenses paid
         (per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                $ 0.2977454922

IV.   Cash Collateral Account Deposit Amount                             $ 0.00

V.    Outstanding Advance Summary

      A. From Prior Period                                       $ 3,906,524.42
      B. From Current Period                                     $ 3,844,365.10
      C. Change in Amount Between Periods (Lines B - A)            $ -62,159.32

VI.   Pool Factor Information

      A. Certificate Principal Balance                         $ 502,970,134.69
      B. Initial Certificate Balance                         $ 1,500,339,658.38
      C. Pool Factor (Lines A / B)                               0.335237512306

VII.  Available Cash Collateral Account Information for Due Period

      A. Available Cash Collateral Amount                       $ 26,803,162.11
      B. Available Cash Collateral Amount Percentage            4.999999999254%

VIII. Required Cash Collateral Amount

      A. For the Current Collection Period                      $ 26,803,162.11
      B. For the Next Collection Period                         $ 25,148,506.73
Reco rd o f Di sc u ss i o n Doc ke t No . FA A- Directorate Id e nt i fie r : - AD

W ith whom o u tside the FAA h as this A D ac ti o n b een d i sc u sse d ( i .e., Des ign A ppr ova l Hold er, ma nu factu r e r , ATA, NBAA, RAA , AO PA , ALPA , GAMA, e t c)?



### ORGAN I ZAT I ON PER S ON CONTA CTE D DA T E T O PI C S DISCU SSE D A4A B o b Ire land 9/23/20 1 3 2 0 2 - 626 - 4 22 8 L eft vo ic e m a i l

Ot her/ A dditi o n a l In fo rm at io n :



### 9
### §8533. Unnecessary duplication

In meeting the requirements under this subchapter, the Under Secretary shall avoid unnecessary duplication between public and private sources of data and the corresponding expenditure of funds and employment of personnel.

(Pub. L. 115–25, title III, §303, Apr. 18, 2017, 131 Stat. 105.)
#### § 367.10 Unaudited items.

Whenever a financial statement is required by the Commission, if it is known that a transaction has occurred that affects the accounts but the amount involved in the transaction and its effect upon the accounts cannot be determined with absolute accuracy, the amount must be estimated and the estimated amount included in the proper accounts. The service company is not required to anticipate minor items that would not appreciably affect the accounts.
### §5308. Protection of proprietary rights

#### (a) Proprietary rights

No trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is privileged or confidential, under the meaning of section 552(b)(4) of title 5, which is obtained from a company as a result of activities under this chapter shall be disclosed.

#### (b) Commercial information

The Secretary, for a period of up to 5 years after the development of information that—

(1) results from research and development activities conducted under this chapter; and

(2) would be a trade secret or commercial or financial information that is privileged or confidential, under the meaning of section 552(b)(4) of title 5, if the information had been obtained from a company,

may provide appropriate protection against the dissemination of such information, including exemption from subchapter II of chapter 5 of title 5.

#### (c) Patent rights

With respect to patent rights, the Institutes shall be treated in the same manner as are nonprofit organizations and small business firms under chapter 18 of title 35, notwithstanding any provisions to the contrary contained in that chapter.

(Pub. L. 101–425, §9, Oct. 15, 1990, 104 Stat. 919.)
Parraguirre 

### clAA coL_Sce rraguirre , J.

J.

2 SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 1111261ESEMMEINNIC iiiiMIE4E 111111111N

motion is meritorious and consent to granting the motion); Las Vegas Fetish & Fantasy Halloween Ball, Inc. v. Ahern Rentals, Inc., 124 Nev. 272, 278 n.15, 182 P.3d 764, 768, n.15 (2008) (stating that the district court did not abuse its discretion in applying then EDCR 2.20(b) (now EDCR 2.20(e)) to an opposition that was eventually filed, but was untimely). Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

-AAA Hardesty

cc: Hon. Elissa F. Cadish, District Judge Eva Garcia-Mendoza, Settlement Judge Herbert Sachs Ranalli & Zaniel, LLC/Henderson Eighth District Court Clerk
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the report of Prospect Medical Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 (the “Report”), I, Jacob Y.Terner, M.D., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
| May  16, 2005 | /s/ JACOB Y. TERNER                                        |
|---------------|------------------------------------------------------------|
| ** **    | **Jacob Y. Terner, MD**                                    |
|          | **Chairman  of the Board and****Chief Executive  Officer** |

 

----
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1

                            INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT

     THIS INDEMNIFCIATION AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is effective as of March
1, 2002, by and between Cobalt Corporation ("Cobalt") and United Government
Services, LLC ("UGS").

     WHEREAS, UGS was organized as a limited liability company on January 1,
1999;

     WHEREAS, Cobalt is the parent corporation of Blue Cross & Blue Shield
United of Wisconsin ("BCBSUW"), which owns one hundred percent (100%) of UGS;

     WHEREAS, BCBSUW and UGS entered into a Contribution Agreement on January 1,
1999, whereby BCBSUW transferred assets to UGS to perform the Medicare Part A
Contract HCFA-87-001-1.70 dated October 1, 1987, as amended, by and between
BCBSUW and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services ("CMS") (the "Medicare
Part A Contract");

     WHEREAS, BCBSUW and UGS seek to novate the Medicare Part A Contract from
BCBSUW to UGS; and

     WHEREAS, Cobalt desires to provide a financial guarantee to UGS with
respect to its performance of services under the Medicare Part A contract
following the novation of the Medicare Part A Contract.

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein,
Cobalt and UGS hereby agree as follows:

     Cobalt hereby guarantees any claims asserted against UGS resulting from the
contractual and financial obligations of UGS in the administration of the
Medicare Part A contract, in an amount equal to 20% of the annual administrative
revenue for the Medicare Part A Contract, measured by the Notice of Budget
Approval, less the equity of UGS.

COBALT CORPORATION                          UNITED GOVERNMENT SERVICES,
                                            LLC

/s/ Thomas R. Hefty                         /s/ Sandra L. Coston
-----------------------------               ----------------------
Thomas R. Hefty                             Sandra L. Coston
Chairman, President & CEO                   President
EXHIBIT 32.2

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gouverneur Bancorp Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
J. Twyman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by
                  the Report.


August 11, 2008                  By:  /s/ Robert J. Twyman
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Robert J. Twyman
                                      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code in accordance with Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall
not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be
deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act
of 1933 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Lawrence Lee, Also Known as G, Also Known as G-SPAWN, Appellant.

[824 NYS2d 452]

Mercure, J.P.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Hoye, J.), rendered October 28, 2003, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

In full satisfaction of an eight-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree. He thereafter moved to withdraw his plea on the basis that it was not voluntarily entered. Specifically, defendant claimed that he was not provided sufficient opportunity to review discovery materials prior to deciding whether to plead guilty or go forward with pretrial suppression hearings and face revocation of the plea offer by the People. County Court denied defendant’s motion and sentenced him in accordance with the negotiated plea agreement to 4V2 to 9 years in prison. Defendant now appeals.

We affirm. Initially, contrary to the People’s assertion, defendant’s argument does concern the voluntariness of his plea and, as such, survives defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal. Moreover, the issue has been preserved for our review by defendant’s motion to withdraw the plea *(see People v Murray,*25 AD3d 911, 912 [2006], *lv denied*6 NY3d 896 [2006]; *People v Batcher,*291 AD2d 581, 582 [2002]).

Turning to the merits, the plea minutes reveal that defendant, by his own assertions, had adequate time to consult with his attorney and was satisfied with his services, fully understood his rights and agreed to give them up and was not threatened or promised anything in exchange for his plea. Defendant then freely admitted the facts underlying the crime and pleaded guilty. Under these circumstances, County Court providently exercised its discretion in denying defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea on the ground that it was voluntarily and *983intelligently entered *(see People v Morris,*30 AD3d 632, 632 [2006]; *People v Kagonyera,*23 AD3d 840, 841 [2005]).

Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 99.12

                          CapRock Telecommunications Corp.
                      Computation of Earnings Per Common Share

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 Basic Earnings Per Share
                                       ----------------------------------------------
                                           Six Months Ended      Three Months Ended     
                                                June 30,               June 30,          
                                       ----------------------------------------------
                                        1997          1998         1997        1998
                                        ----          ----         ----        ----
<S>                                 <C>           <C>          <C>           <C>
Numerator:
Net income                          $   428,715   $ 1,785,274  $   521,496      888,033     
                                    -----------   -----------  -----------   ----------
Denominator:

Denominator for basic earnings
  Per share - weighted average
  Shares outstanding                 10,398,954    10,398,954   10,398,954   10,398,954   
Effect of dilutive securities:
  Employee stock options                      -       177,047            -      177,341            
                                    -----------   -----------  -----------   ----------
                                     10,398,954    10,576,001   10,398,954   10,576,295   
                                    -----------   -----------  -----------   ----------
                                    -----------   -----------  -----------   ----------

     Basic earnings per share              $.04          $.17         $.05         $.09         
                                           ----          ----         ----         ----
                                           ----          ----         ----         ----

     Dilutive earnings per share           $.04          $.17         $.05         $.08         
                                           ----          ----         ----         ----
                                           ----          ----         ----         ----
</TABLE>
### §77u. Hearings by Commission

All hearings shall be public and may be held before the Commission or an officer or officers of the Commission designated by it, and appropriate records thereof shall be kept.

(May 27, 1933, ch. 38, title I, §21, 48 Stat. 86.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of Securities and Exchange Commission, with certain exceptions, to Chairman of such Commission, see Reorg. Plan No. 10 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3175, 64 Stat. 1265, set out under section 78d of this title.