# SACRA EN 0 EGIONAL

8-HOROZO TAIM T D RE SO ABLE FURT ER ROGRES PLAN

(2013 SIP REVISIONS)

Se embe 2,2032013 Revisionstothe Sacramento Regional 8-HourOzoneAttainment

and Reasonable Further Progress Plan September26, 2013 

## VOC Emission

. 

### Automotive Refinishing Category Reduction (tpd)

Adoption Implement District Measure 2018 Year Year SMAQMD-459 2011 2012 0.1 FRAQMD-3.19 2016 2017 <0.1 PCAPCD-234 2015 2017 <0.1 YSAQMD-2.26 2008 2009-2010 <0.1



### Total 0.2 DegreasinglSolvent Cleaning Degreasing and solvent cleaning operations are performed by many commercial and industrial facilities. Solvents are used for surface preparation for further processing and cleaning after manufacturing. Degreasing is widely used by automotive repair and maintenance facilities and by electric apparatus and electronic component manufacturing or repair, construction trades, printing shops, metal parts and products, can coating, and other types of commercial and manufacturing facilities. Solvents are also used by coating operations for cleaning of coating application equipment such as spray guns and brushes. VOC emissions from general surface preparation and degreasing operations resultfrom the evaporation oforganic solvents. This measure primarily proposes to lower the VOC limits in the materials used in general cleaning and degreasing operations (which include cold cleaning, vapor degreasers, hand wiping, thinning and cleanup solvents). 

## VOC Emission

DegreasinglSolventCleaning Category Reduction (tpd)

Adoption Implement 2018 District Measure Year Year FRAQMD-3.14 2011 2011 <0.1 YSAQMD-2.24!2.31 2008 2009 0.7



### Total 0.8

Proposed control Measures

Page 7-282013 Revision tothe Sacramento Regional 8-HourOzoneAttainment

and Reasonable Further Progress Plan September26, 2013



## SACRAMENTO REGIONAL 8-HOUR OZON ATTAINMENTA D R ASONABLE FURTHER PROGRESS PLAN

APPENDICES (2013 SIP REVISIONS) A. EMISSIONS INVENTORY B. PHOTOCHEMICAL MODELING C. PROPOSED CONTROL MEASURES D. TRANSPORTATION CONTROL MEASURES E. WEIGHT-OF-EVIDENCE ANALYSES F. MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSIONS BUDGETS AND VMT OFFSET ANALYSIS G. REASONABLE FURTHER PROGRESS DEMONSTRATIONS H. REASONABLYAVAILABLE CONTROL MEASURES (RACM) ANALYSIS I. FEDERAL CLEAN AIR ACT REQUIREMENTS

Appendices: Title Page2013 SIP Revisions tothe Sacramento Regional 8-Hour OzoneAttainment

and Reasonable Further Progress Plan September26, 2013 

### Appendix C: Proposed Control Measures Appendix C contains a summarytable ofemission reductions by control measure and a summary table of emission reductions by air district. This appendix also includes more detailed information on the individual proposed control measures. The non-regulatory control measures are listed first and include various regional measures (on-road and off-road mobile incentive programs, and an emerging/voluntary urban forest development program). These are followed by the regulatory control measures, which include a variety of stationary and area-wide source control measures. The stationary and area-wide source measures include write-ups for individual air districts in the Sacramento nonattainmentarea. The final section includes a description offurtherstudy measures. Information on transportation control measures is included in Appendix D. SummaryTable of Emission Reductions by Control Measure C-4 SummaryTable of Emission Reductions byAir District C-6 

### SummaryTable of Emission Reductions forAdopted New Local Control Measures C-7
NON-REGULATORYCONTROL MEASURES Regional Mobile Measures All Mobile Source Incentive Programs C-9 Regional Urban Forest Control Measures SMAQMD-1 Urban ForestAir Quality Development Program 0-15 REGULATORY CONTROL MEASURES Stationary and Area-wide Source Control Measures VOC Control Measures Architectural Coatings 0-56 SMAQMD-442 EDCAQMD-21 5 FRAQMD-3.1 5 PCAPCD-21 8 YSAQMD-2.14 Automotive Refinishing 0-81 SMAQMD-459 FRAQMD-3.19 PCAPCD-234 

### YSAQMD-2.26 Table

### ofContents Page C-I2013 SIP Revisions to the Sacramento Regional 8-Hour Ozone Attainment

and Reasonable Further Progress Plan September26, 2013



### SummaryTable of Emission Reductions by Control Measure

Reaional Mobile Incentive Program

—On-road Reaional Mobile Incentive Program

—Off-road ~p~re The Air Program SACOG Transportation Control Measures Urban Forest Development Program Total Non-regulatory Measures Reaulatorv

~ Stationaryand Area-wide Source Measures Architectural Coating SMAQMD-442 EDCAQMD-21 5 FRAQMD-3.1 5 PCAPCD-21 8 YSAQMD-2.14 Total Architectural Coating 0.032 0.005 0.059 tbd 0-0.18 0.1

# ó

0.913 0.186 0.004 0.201 0.214 1.52 

### Emission Reductions (TPD) Measure Name VOC NO~ Non-regulatory Measures

Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products PCAPCD-CM3 0.014

- Total Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products 0.01 Natural Gas Production and Processing SMAQMD-461 0.116

- Total Natural Gas Production and Processing 0.12

- Automotive Refinishing SMAQMD-459 FRAQMD-3.1 9 PCAPCD-234 YSAQMD-2.26 Total Automotive Refinishing Degreasing/Solvent Cleaning FRAQMD-3. 14 YSAQMD-2.24/2.31 Total DegreasjncilSolvent Cleaning Graphic Arts

. YSAQMD-2.29 Total GraphicArts 0.113 0.001 0.045 0.058 0.22
0.001 0.762 0.76 0.50

0.013 0.046 tbd
0.56

SummaryTable of Emission Reductions by Control Measure Page C-32013 SIP Revisions to the Sacramento Regional 8-Hour OzoneAttainment

and Reasonable Further Progress Plan September26, 2013



### SummaryTable of Emission Reductions byAir District

Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Architectural Coatina (SMAQMD-442) Automotive Refinishina (SMAQMD-459) Natural’Gas Production and Processina (SMAQMD-461) Total Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD El Dorado County AQMD Architectural Coating (EDCAQMD-21 5) LargeWater Heaters and Small Boilers (EDCAQMD-239) Total El Dorado CountyAQMD Feather RiverAQMD Architectural‘Coating (FRAQMD-3.15) Automotive Refinishing (FRAQMD-3.19) Degreasing/Solvent Cleaning (FRAQMD-3.14) IC Engines (FRAQMD-3.22) 0.913 0.113 0.1 16 1.14

0.186 0.17
0.004, 0.001 0.001 0.00

0.003 0.00 . . . Emission Reductions Air District (TPD) Control Measure Name (Rule No.) 2018

. 

### VOC NO~ Stationaryand Area Source Measures

Yolo-SolanoAQMD ArchitecturarC’oating(YSAQMD-2. 1’4) 0~21~4

- Automotive Refinishing (YSAQMD-2.26) 0.058

- Degreasing/Solvent Cleaning (YSAQMD-2.24/2.31) 0.762

- GraphicArts (YSAQMD-2.29)

--- - Boilers, Steam Gen. & Process Heaters (YSAQMD-2.27)

- 0.288 LargeWater Heaters and SmallBoilers (YSAQMD-2.37)

- 0.240 Total Yolo-SolanoAQMD 1.03 0.53 Total Stationaryand Area-wide Source Measures 2.63 0.56 LargeWater Heaters and Small Boilers (FRAQMD-3.23) Total Feather RiverAQMD PlacerCountyAPCD Architectural Coating (PCAPCD-21 8) Automotive Refinishing (PCAPCD-234) Misc. Metal Parts and Products (PCAPCD-CM3) LargeWater Heaters and Small Boilers (PCAPCD-CM2) Total PlacerCountyAPCD 0.01

0.201 0.045 0.014 0.26 0.004

.0.000 o;oo

0.030 0.03

SummaryTable of Emission Reductions byAir District Page C-52013 Revision to the Sacramento Regional 8-Hour Ozone Appendix C

- Proposed Control Measures

Attainment and Reasonable Further Progress Plan September26, 2013 

### Control Measure Number: FRAQMD

- 

### 3.19 Control Measure Title: Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coating Operations Date: February2, 2007 Control Measure Description Automotive refinishing coatings are used on motor vehicles and other mobile equipment, primarily by auto body repair and paint shops and automotive dealerships. VOC emissions from the surface coating operations result from the evaporation ofthe organic solvents used in the coatings. These emissions occur in a number of places during the operation, including surface preparation and cleanup, application of the coating, drying ofthe parts, and cleanup ofthe application equipment. On October 20, 2005, CARB adopted a Suggested Control Measure (SCM) for automotive coatings. The SCM would introduce several significant changes into FRAQMD Rule 3.19, Vehicle and Motor EquipmentCoating Operations, such as:

• Consolidation of limitsforGroup I and Group II vehicles
• Consolidation ofthe primers, primersealers, and primersurfacercategories
• Deletion of the multi-stage topcoats category, and replacement with separate limitsforcolorcoats and clearcoats • Elimination ofthe specialty coatings category, with specific limits foreach type of coating, and a general limit applicableto all othercoatings.
• LowerVOC limitsformostcoating categories. The proposed control measure will evaluate the information from CARB’s SCM and propose amendments to Rule 3.19. Emission Inventory

—

### 2018 The population growth rate in South Sutter is purely based on the current Sutter County population growth rate projected by SACOG. The potential growth of proposed South SutterSpecific Plan (nowcalled Sutter Pointe Specific Plan) is notfactored in. VOC Planning Inventory (tpd) EIC Code EIC Description 2018 Automobile Refinish 0 0035 230-218-9000-0000 Coatings, Unspecified Total 0.0035

Automotive Refinishing FRAQMD-3.19 Page C-812013 Revision tothe Sacramento Regional 8-HourOzone

Attainment and Reasonable Further Progress Plan AppendixC

- Proposed Control Measures

_______________ September26. 2013 

### Emission Reductions

The cost effectiveness is expected to range between $5,560 and $77,300 per ton of ROG reduced. Authority The Feather River Air Quality Management District has the authority to propose rules and regulations to the District Board for adoption under HSC 40001. Implementation The implementation of this control measure does not involve any other agency other than the Feather RiverAirQuality Management District. References 1. El Dorado CountyAQMD Rule 230, Adopted September27, 1994. 2. Feather RiverAQMD Rule 3.19, Adopted August 6, 1998. 3. Placer CountyAPCD Rule 234, Revised April 9, 1998. 4. Sacramento Metro AQMD Rule 459, Revised October2, 1997. 5. Yolo-Solano AQMD Rule 2.26, Revised August 13, 1997. 6. Draft Staff Report, Rule 459, SMAQMD, August 2001. 7. Rule adoption files, Rule 459, SMAQMD. 8. California Air Resources Board, Staff Report for The Proposed Suggested Control Measures Automotive Coatings, October2005 9. California ARB Forecasted Emissions by Summary Category, Ozone SIP Sacramento NAA Projections (vi .06_RF980) www.arb.ca.gov/app/emsinv/O3sjp/fcemssum~~~ 03v1 .06.ph~. November 16, 2006 10. Control Measure, FRAQMD —3.19, February2, 2007

Automotive Refinishing FRAQMD-3.lg Page C-82 

### Cost Effectiveness2013 Revision to the Sacramento Regional 8-Hour Ozone

Attainment and Reasonable Further Prociress Plan

Appendix H: ReasonablyAvailable Control MeasuresAnalysis Page H-22 Appendix C

- Proposed Control Measures

September26, 2013 Table H-4 FRAQMD StationaryiArea Source Control Measures Considered Measure Opportunityfor No. Title Current Requirements Strengthening Conclusion Establish VOC limits on Not Recommended Adhesives and None adhesives and sealants

- Evaluated for Sealants similarto limits used in Attainment SCAQMD Advancement ReducetheVOC limits Architectural VOC limits on coatings on the coatings Control Measure 3.15 Coatings consistentwith the SCM Degreasing? Keep lid close on tanks greater RequireVOC limits on 3.14 Solvent than 55 gallons. degreasing/solvent Control Measure Cleaning cleaning process. Establish VOC limits on Not Recommended Unspecified None coatingsthat have not

- Evaluated for 2 Coatings been established in Attainment another rule. Advancement ReducetheVOC limits Automotive VOC limits on coatings on the coatings Control Measure 3.19 Refinishing consistentwith the SCM Paper, Fabric, Establish VOC limits on Not Recommended and Film None coatings.

- No sources Coating NOx limits on boiler/steam

generatorswith rated heat input Require NOx limits for Not Recommended Boilers and capacity of1 mmBtu/hrorgreater; boilerbetween 1-5

- Evaluated for 3.21 Steam 1-5 mmBTU/hrAnnual Tune Up, mmBtu/hr, and reduce Attainment Generators >5 mmBTU/hrusing gaseous fuel NOx limitforboiler>5 Advancement

30 ppm, >5 mmBTU/hr using non- mmBtu/hr gaseous fuel 40 ppm NOx limits on boiler/steam generatorswith rated heat input Boilers and capacityof I mmBtu/hrorgreater; Reduce NOx limitto6 Not Recommended 3.21 Steam 1-5 mmBTU/hrAnnual Tune Up, ppm for>20 mmBTU/hr

— No Sources Generators >5 mmBTU/hr using gaseous fuel

30 ppm, >5 mmBTU/hr using nongaseous fuel 40 ppm Establish NOx limits on 3.22 IC Engines None Control Measure engines. Not Recommended 3.8/3.9 StorageTanks Requires use ofafloating roofor Lowerapplicability

- Evaluated for vapor loss control device threshold Attainment Advancement Establish CAP and Trade Not Recommended Emission Reduction

- Evaluated for Cap and Trade None Program similarto Attainment SCAQMDs RECLAIM Advancement Program Establish standards to Not Recommended Commercial None control VOC emissions

- Evaluated for Cooking forCommercial Cooking Attainment (i.e. charboilers) Advancement Livestock Lowerapplicability Not Recommended

None Waste threshold

— No Sources Establish standards to Not Recommended reduce evaporativeVOC

- Evaluated for Wineries None emissions from the Attainment fermentation process at Advancement wineries