alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 366.6 Previously authorized activities. ( a ) *General.* Unless otherwise provided by Commission rule or order, a person may continue to engage in activities or transactions authorized under the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 prior to the effective date of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 2005, February 8, 2006, until the later of the date such authorization expires or December 31, 2007, so long as that person continues to comply with the terms of such authorization. If any such activities or transactions are challenged in a formal Commission proceeding, the person claiming prior authorization shall be required to provide at that time the full text of any such authorization (whether by rule, order, or letter) and the application(s) or pleading(s) underlying such authorization (whether by rule, order, or letter).
( b ) *Financing Authorizations.* Holding companies that intend to rely on financing authorization orders or letters issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission must file these orders or letters with the Commission within 30 days after the effective date of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 2005, February 8, 2006; any reports or other submissions that, pursuant to such financing authorizations, previously were filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission must instead be filed with the Commission, effective February 8, 2006. For the purposes of this section, compliance with the terms of such financing authorizations includes the requirement to notify the Commission of any financing transactions that a holding company engages in pursuant to such financing authorization.
### §8815. Sunset

#### (a) In general

Except as provided in subsection (b), the authority to carry out sections 8811, 8812, 8813, 8814, and 8814a of this title shall terminate on the date that is 11 years after December 21, 2018.

#### (b) Extension

The President may continue the activities under such sections if the President determines that such activities are necessary to meet national economic or national security needs.

(Pub. L. 115–368, title I, §106, formerly §105, Dec. 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 5097; renumbered §106 and amended Pub. L. 117–81, div. F, title LXVI, §6606(a)(1), (b)(1), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2442, 2443.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 117–81, §6606(b)(1), substituted "8813, 8814, and 8814a" for "8813, and 8814".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2021 Amendment

Amendment by section 6606(a)(1) of Pub. L. 117–81 effective as if included in the enactment of the National Quantum Initiative Act, see section 6606(b)(2) of Pub. L. 117–81, set out as an Effective Date note under section 8814a of this title.
#### J.C. et al., Infants, by Their Parent and Natural Guardian Kelly Caldwell, Appellants, v Charles A. Rose, Respondent, et al., Defendant.

[823 NYS2d 710]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Matthew A. Rosenbaum, J.), entered March 8, 2006 in a personal injuiy action. The order granted the motion of defendant Charles A. Rose to dismiss the complaint against him.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without *1249costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint against defendant Charles A. Rose is reinstated.

Memorandum: Plaintiffs commenced this action by their parent and natural guardian seeking damages arising from lead poisoning sustained as the result of their exposure to lead-based paint in their residence. According to plaintiffs, defendants owned the property where plaintiffs resided, retained the right to enter the premises, and had knowledge of peeling lead-based paint on the property and that young children resided there. Charles A. Rose (defendant) moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against him on the ground that he was out of possession of the property during the relevant time period and that defendant Michael DeCarlo was solely responsible for the care, maintenance, management, and operation of the property. In opposing the motion, plaintiffs contended, inter alia, that the motion was premature because further discovery was needed. We agree with plaintiffs that the motion was premature and that Supreme Court therefore erred in granting it. Plaintiffs are entitled to the opportunity to depose defendant to determine the nature of his relationship with DeCarlo with respect to the property *(see*CPLR 3212 [f]; *Whelan v Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J.,*19 AD3d 483 [2005]; *Catena v Amsterdam Mem. Hosp.,*6 AD3d 1037, 1038-1039 [2004]). Present—Kehoe, J.P., Martoche, Centra, Green and Pine, JJ.
### §7242. Improper influence on conduct of audits

#### (a) Rules to prohibit

It shall be unlawful, in contravention of such rules or regulations as the Commission shall prescribe as necessary and appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of investors, for any officer or director of an issuer, or any other person acting under the direction thereof, to take any action to fraudulently influence, coerce, manipulate, or mislead any independent public or certified accountant engaged in the performance of an audit of the financial statements of that issuer for the purpose of rendering such financial statements materially misleading.

#### (b) Enforcement

In any civil proceeding, the Commission shall have exclusive authority to enforce this section and any rule or regulation issued under this section.

#### (c) No preemption of other law

The provisions of subsection (a) shall be in addition to, and shall not supersede or preempt, any other provision of law or any rule or regulation issued thereunder.

#### (d) Deadline for rulemaking

The Commission shall—

(1) propose the rules or regulations required by this section, not later than 90 days after July 30, 2002; and

(2) issue final rules or regulations required by this section, not later than 270 days after July 30, 2002.

(Pub. L. 107–204, title III, §303, July 30, 2002, 116 Stat. 778.)
EXHIBIT 32.1

Section 1350 Certifications

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Actuate Corporation (the
Company) for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge on the date hereof, the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 9, 2006                                
|                                                     
|/s/ Peter I. Cittadini                               
|Peter I. Cittadini                                   
|President and Chief Executive Officer                
|(Principal Executive Officer)                        
|                                                     
|/s/ Daniel A. Gaudreau                               
|Daniel A. Gaudreau                                   
|Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration and
|Chief Financial Officer                              
|(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 822 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 822

         To permit the televising of Supreme Court proceedings.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 14, 2019

     Mr. Durbin (for himself, Mr. Grassley, Ms. Klobuchar, and Mr. 
  Blumenthal) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To permit the televising of Supreme Court proceedings.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Cameras in the Courtroom Act''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO TITLE 28.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 45 of title 28, United States Code, is 
amended by inserting at the end the following:
``Sec. 678. Televising Supreme Court proceedings
    ``The Supreme Court shall permit television coverage of all open 
sessions of the Court unless the Court decides, by a vote of the 
majority of justices, that allowing such coverage in a particular case 
would constitute a violation of the due process rights of 1 or more of 
the parties before the Court.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The chapter analysis for chapter 45 of 
title 28, United States Code, is amended by inserting at the end the 
following:

``678. Televising Supreme Court proceedings.''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 367.1440 Account 144, Accumulated provision for uncollectible accounts—Credit. ( a ) This account must be credited with amounts provided for losses on accounts receivable that may become uncollectible, and also with collections on related previously charged accounts. Concurrent charges must be made to account 904, Uncollectible accounts (§ 367.9040), for amounts applicable to service company operations, and to corresponding accounts for other operations. Records must be maintained so as to show the write-offs of account receivable for each service company department.
( b ) This account must be subdivided to show the provision applicable to the following classes of accounts receivable: ( 1 ) Service company customers.
( 2 ) Merchandising, jobbing and contract work.
( 3 ) Officers and employees.
( 4 ) Others.
( c ) Accretions to this account must not be made in excess of a reasonable provision against losses of the related character.
( d ) If provisions for uncollectible notes receivable or for uncollectible receivables from associate companies are necessary, separate related subaccounts must be established under the account in which the receivable is carried.
§ 41.1 Notice to audited person. ( a ) *Applicability.* This part applies to all audits conducted by the Commission or its staff under authority of the Federal Power Act except for Electric Reliability Organization audits conducted pursuant to the authority of part 39 of the Commission's regulations.
( b ) *Notice.* An audit conducted by the Commission's staff under authority of the Federal Power Act may result in a notice of deficiency or audit report or similar document containing a finding or findings that the audited person has not complied with a requirement of the Commission with respect to, but not limited to, the following: A filed tariff or tariffs, contracts, data, records, accounts, books, communications or papers relevant to the audit of the audited person; matters under the Standards of Conduct or the Code of Conduct; and the activities or operations of the audited person. The notice of deficiency, audit report or similar document may also contain one or more proposed remedies that address findings of noncompliance. Where such findings, with or without proposed remedies, appear in a notice of deficiency, audit report or similar document, such document shall be provided to the audited person, and the finding or findings, and any proposed remedies, shall be noted and explained. The audited person shall timely indicate in a written response any and all findings or proposed remedies, or both, in any combination, with which the audited person disagrees. The audited person shall have 15 days from the date it is sent the notice of deficiency, audit report or similar document to provide a written response to the audit staff indicating any and all findings or proposed remedies, or both, in any combination, with which the audited person disagrees, and such further time as the audit staff may provide in writing to the audited person at the time the document is sent to the audited person. The audited person may move the Commission for additional time to provide a written response to the audit staff and such motion shall be granted for good cause shown. Any initial order that the Commission subsequently may issue with respect to the notice of deficiency, audit report or similar document shall note, but not address on the merits, the finding or findings, or the proposed remedy or remedies, or both, in any combination, with which the audited person disagreed. The Commission shall provide the audited person 30 days to respond to the initial Commission order concerning a notice of deficiency, audit report or similar document with respect to the finding or findings or any proposed remedy or remedies, or both, in any combination, with which it disagreed.
[Order 675-A, 71 FR 29784, May 24, 2006]
5600 Fishers Lane • Rockville, MD 20857

www.samhsa.gov • 1‐877‐SAMHSA‐7 (1‐877‐726‐4727)

November 3, 2021 

The Honorable Richard Burr 

Ranking Member 

Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 20510 

Dear Senator Burr: 

I am pleased to provide you with the National Strategy for Trauma-informed Care Operating 

Plan (Operating Plan). The Operating Plan, created through a collaborative effort between the 

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) and representatives of 

20 Federal agencies and departments who comprise the Interagency Task Force for Traumainformed Care, is submitted in accordance with the requirement in SUPPORT for Patients and 

Communities Act (Public Law 115-271) Title VII, Subtitle N, Section 7132, subsection (e). 

Through the Operating Plan, the Task Force identifies childhood trauma, including substance 

misuse, as a serious public health problem in the United States with potentially long-lasting 

negative impacts compounded by racial and historical trauma. To address this, communities 

need support to build infrastructure and capacity to prevent trauma, respond to those impacted by 

trauma, and enhance resilience. A robust evidence base for a continuum of interventions at the 

individual, system, and community levels are needed to promote the provision of best practices. 

The Operating Plan describes activities to implement the National Strategy for Trauma-informed 

Care to identify, evaluate, and make recommendations regarding (1) best practices with respect 

to children and families who have experienced trauma or are at risk of experiencing trauma; and 

(2) ways federal agencies can better coordinate responses to families affected by substance use 

disorders and trauma. 

We look forward to your review of the National Strategy for Trauma-informed Care Operating 

Plan and support of its implementation. 

Sincerely, 

/Miriam E. Delphin-Rittmon,/

Miriam E. Delphin-Rittmon, Ph.D. 

Enclosure 

Behavioral Health is Essential to Health • Prevention Works • Treatment is Effective • People Recover
§ 11.4 Use of government dams for pumped storage projects, and use of tribal lands. ( a ) *General Rule.* The Commission will determine on a case-by-case basis under section 10(e) of the Federal Power Act the annual charges for any pumped storage project using a Government dam or other structure and for any project using tribal lands within Indian reservations.
( b ) *Information reporting.* ( 1 ) Except as provided in paragraph (b)(2) of this section a Licensee whose project includes pumped storage facilities must file with the Commission, on or before November 1 of each year, a sworn statement showing the gross amount of energy generated during the preceding fiscal year, and the amount of energy provided free of charge to the Government, and the amount of energy used for pumped storage pumping.
( 2 ) A licensee who has filed these data under another section of part 11 or who has submitted identical data with FERC or the Energy Information Administration for the same fiscal year is not required to file the information required in paragraph (b)(1) of this section. Referenced filings should be identified by company name, date filed, docket or project number, and form number.
( c ) Commencing in 1993, the annual charges for any project using tribal land within Indian reservations will be billed during the fiscal year in which the land is used, for the use of that land during that year.
[Order 379, 49 FR 22778, June 1, 1984. Redesignated at 51 FR 24318, July 3, 1986; Order 469, 52 FR 18209, May 14, 1987; 52 FR 33802, Sept. 8, 1987; Order 551, 58 FR 15770, Mar. 24, 1993]
#### § 385.208 [Reserved]
#### § 33.5 Proposed accounting entries.

If the applicant is required to maintain its books of account in accordance with the Commission's Uniform System of Accounts in part 101 of this chapter, the applicant must present proposed accounting entries showing the effect of the transaction with sufficient detail to indicate the effects on all account balances (including amounts transferred on an interim basis), the effect on the income statement, and the effects on other relevant financial statements. The applicant must also explain how the amount of each entry was determined.
p. 1 

# OAR Box 

# 1828 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 103 ) ll-K-(B)-9 2 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/200811:12:51 AM Sheet 103 of 325P. 2 

# /A\ P II-K-(B)-9 2

N0 XCOS T ALGORITH M

DEVELOPMEN T FO

RIFCA M Lette r fro

m M . Jennings , Radia nt o T . Hogan , EE A Octobe r 19 , 198 2 THI S INFORMATION

CA N B E FOUN D IN

DOCKE T A-79-02 , ITE

M II-K-(B)-9 2
#### OLYMPIC PRODUCTIONS, INC., d/b/a SAV-MOR SUPERMARKETS, Plaintiff v. ZEE’S DEPARTMENT STORE CORPORATION, Defendant

Civil No. 1798-75

Superior Court of Guam

November 15, 1976

BENSON, *Judge*

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

The above-entitled action was tried on November 4,1976. Mr. Timothy A. Stewart appeared for the plaintiff. Defendant was not represented by counsel, however, Mr. P. C. Liu, Director of defendant corporation was present at the trial.

*376FINDINGS OF FACT

1. That an account was stated in writing between plaintiff and defendant in the amount of $7205.00 which amount is now due and owing, and has been a fixed sum since July 1975.

2. The plaintiff is indebted to the defendant for goods sold and delivered in the amount of $950.77.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

1. The plaintiff is entitled to judgment against the defendant in the amount of $6,254.28 with interest thereon at 6% per annum from July 1975 until fully paid, and to the costs of this action in the sum of $95.50.

Let judgment be entered accordingly.

JUDGMENT

This'cause came on regularly for trial on the 4th day of November, 1976, before the Honorable Richard H. Benson, Judge, presiding, sitting without a jury. The plaintiff appeared by their attorney, Mr. Timothy A. Stewart. The defendant was not represented by counsel, however, Mr. P. C. Lieu, Director of defendant corporation, was present at the trial. Evidence both oral and documentary having been presented by both parties and the cause having been made and caused to be filed its written Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that plaintiff have judgment against defendant in the amount of $6,254.23 plus interest of 6% per annum from July 1975 until paid, and to the costs of this action in the sum of $95.50.
#### § 367.1810 Account 181, Unamortized debt expense.

This account must include expenses related to the issuance or assumption of debt securities. Amounts recorded in this account must be amortized over the life of each respective issue under a plan that will distribute the amount equitably over the life of the security. The amortization must be on a monthly basis, and the related amounts must be charged to account 428, Amortization of debt discount and expense (§ 367.4280). Any unamortized amounts outstanding at the time that the related debt is prematurely reacquired must be accounted for as indicated in General Instructions in § 367.16.
Revised Schedule of Priorities
                       Effective as of November 21, 1994


     RESOLVED, that pursuant to Section 4 of the Stockholders Agreement dated as
of July 7,  1988,  as  amended  prior  to the  date  hereof  (the  "Stockholders
Agreement"), among this Corporation, Kelso ASI Partners, L.P. and the Management
Shareholders (as such term is defined in the Stockholders Agreement),  the Board
of Directors  hereby  amends and restates as follows the schedule of  priorities
for the payment of shares of common stock of this  Corporation  repurchased from
Management  Shareholders  (with all references below to $100,000 being deemed to
be $33,000 in the case of payment obligations arising under clauses (A), (B) and
(C) of section 2.2(a) of the Stockholders Agreement, except that such references
shall be deemed to be $66,000 in the case of a payment  obligation arising under
subclause (x) of said clause (C):

At the Beginning of Each Year:

(i) When the December 31, 1994  valuation is received,  and at the  beginning of
each  year  thereafter,  apply  up to  $100,000  to  discharge  or  reduce  each
outstanding payment obligation that arose in a prior year to the extent that the
funds so applied do not exceed the value of the shares plus interest.

Periodically During the Year:

(ii) Up to the balance remaining under the $10 million annual limitation,  apply
up to $100,000 to each payment obligation that arises in such year.

At the End of the Year:

(iii) Up to the balance remaining under the $10 million annual limitation, apply
up to $100,000 to discharge or reduce each remaining payment obligation referred
to in (i) and (ii) above to the  extent  that the funds so applied do not exceed
the original cost of the shares giving rise to such payment obligation;

(iv) Up to the balance remaining under the $10 million annual limitation, repeat
(iii) above with respect to each remaining payment obligaiton referred to in (i)
and (ii)  above  until the  original  cost of the shares is covered or the funds
available for the year are exhausted;
<PAGE>
(v) Up to the balance remaining under the $10 million annual  limitation,  apply
up to $100,000 to discharge or reduce each remaining payment obligation referred
to in (i) and (ii) above (including  accrued interest and any appreciation  over
the original cost of the shares giving rise to such payment obligations); and

     (vi) Up to the balance  remaining under the $10 million annual  limitation,
repeat (v) above until the payment obligations referred to in (i) and (ii) above
are discharged or the available funds for the year are exhausted.

                                                             * * *