alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.28






A G C O   C O R P O R A T I O N


DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
for
NON -  EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS
(as of January 1, 2015)
	
	
	 








	
		
	Retainers  (1)
	USD

	 
	 

	Annual Lead Director Retainer (paid only to Lead Director):
	30,000

	 
	 

	Annual Director Base Retainer (applies to all Directors):
	100,000

	 
	 

	Annual Committee Chairperson Retainer:
                  (except Audit Committee and Compensation Committee Chair)
	15,000

	 
	 

	Annual Audit Committee Chairperson Retainer:
	25,000

	 
	 

	Annual Compensation Committee Chairperson Retainer:
	20,000














	
		
	Additional Compensation
	 

	 
	 

	Annual AGCO Stock Grant Award (2)
	120,000












In addition, the Company will reimburse directors for the reasonable out-of-pocket expense incurred in the attendance of the meeting.


















Page 1 of 2 





Page 1 of 2






A G C O   C O R P O R A T I O N


DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
for
NON - EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS
(as of January 1, 2015)
	
	
	











Notes:


		
	1)
	Payments of annual retainers are made in accordance with the following provisions:








		
	I)
	Annual Retainers are paid quarterly in four installments (for ease of calculation purposes quarters are divided into 90 days with a 360 day year).


		
	II)
	Annual Retainers accrue as of the first day of each calendar quarter based on the Board and Committee Membership Roster in effect on that date.


		
	III)
	Annual Retainers are paid in advance during the first month of the given calendar quarter (e.g., January for the first quarter).


		
	IV)
	Changes to Board and Committee Memberships (including Chairpersons) will be reviewed and adjustments made to current quarter’s retainer amounts (up or down).


		
	V)
	Any changes in the Retainer amounts due for the current quarter will be reflected in the ensuing quarter’s retainer payment.






		
	2)
	Terms applicable to the Stock Grant Award are defined in the Plan Document. The stock grant equivalent to USD 120,000 is based on closing price on the day of the Annual Shareholder’s meeting.
































Page 2 of 2
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 12, 2014.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 13

- 00904

- CV

SCWYANA SMITH , Appellant

V.
BEAR CREEK MEADOWS H OMEOWNERS ASSOCIATIO N , Appellee

On Appeal from the 61st District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2012

- 75442



### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
This is an appeal from a judgment signed July 23 , 201 3

. Appellant filed a timely motion for new trial and notice of appeal. The clerk’s record was filed
December 17 , 20 13 . The court reporter notified th is court that no reporter’s record

was taken in this case

. Appellant’s brief was due January 16, 2014, but it was not filed. We granted a ppellant ’s request for a n extension of time to file the brief until April 23, 2014, noting that no further extensions o f time would be granted absent exceptional circumstances. No brief was filed.2

On May 8 , 20 14 , this court issued an order stating that unless appellant filed
a brief on or before May 30 , 20 14 , the court would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P . 42.3(b). Appellant filed no brief or other

response. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Busby, and Wise

.
§ 385.1507 Election of procedures and answer (Rule 1507). ( a ) If the respondent receiving the notice of proposed penalty wishes to have the procedures of Rule 1509 apply, then the respondent must file with the Commission, within 30 days of receipt of the notice, a notification of the election in accordance with subpart T, part 385 of this chapter. The notification may include an answer setting forth factual or legal reasons why the proposed assessment order should not be issued, should be reduced in amount, or should otherwise be modified. If a person fails to file an answer within the 30-day time limit, all material facts stated in the Commission's notice will be deemed admitted.
( b ) Any election to have the procedures of Rule 1509 apply may not be revoked after the 30-day election period in paragraph (a) of this section, without the consent of the Commission.
§ 2.26 Policies concerning review of applications under section 203. ( a ) The Commission has adopted a Policy Statement on its policies for reviewing transactions subject to section 203. That Policy Statement can be found at 77 FERC ¶ 61,263 (1996). The Policy Statement is a complete description of the relevant guidelines. Paragraphs (b)-(e) of this section are only a brief summary of the Policy Statement.
( b ) *Factors Commission will generally consider.* In determining whether a proposed transaction subject to section 203 is consistent with the public interest, the Commission will generally consider the following factors; it may also consider other factors: ( 1 ) The effect on competition;
( 2 ) The effect on rates; and
( 3 ) The effect on regulation.
( c ) *Effect on competition.* Applicants should provide data adequate to allow analysis under the Department of Justice/Federal Trade Commission Merger Guidelines, as described in the Policy Statement and Appendix A to the Policy Statement.
( d ) *Effect on rates.* Applicants should propose mechanisms to protect customers from costs due to the merger. If the proposal raises substantial issues of relevant fact, the Commission may set this issue for hearing.
( e ) *Effect on regulation.* ( 1 ) Where the affected state commissions have authority to act on the transaction, the Commission will not set for hearing whether the transaction would impair effective regulation by the state commissions. The application should state whether the state commissions have this authority.
( 2 ) Where the affected state commissions do not have authority to act on the transaction, the Commission may set for hearing the issue of whether the transaction would impair effective state regulation.
( f ) Under section 203(a)(4) of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 824b), in reviewing a proposed transaction subject to section 203, the Commission will also consider whether the proposed transaction will result in cross-subsidization of a non-utility associate company or pledge or encumbrance of utility assets for the benefit of an associate company, unless that cross-subsidization, pledge, or encumbrance will be consistent with the public interest.
[Order 592, 61 FR 68606, Dec. 30, 1996, as amended by Order 669-A, 71 FR 28443, May 16, 2006]
| **INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS (Details Textual) (USD $)** | 3 Months Ended |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
||
| Income Loss Not Recognized Under Equity Method Accounting           | $ 53,160       | $ 314,956 |
| Series One [Member]                                                 |           |   |
| Income Loss Not Recognized Under Equity Method Accounting           | 0              | 51,891 |
| Series Two [Member]                                                 |           |   |
| Income Loss Not Recognized Under Equity Method Accounting           | 0              | 80,525 |
| Series Three [Member]                                               |           |   |
| Income Loss Not Recognized Under Equity Method Accounting           | 53,160         | 98,465 |
| Series Four [Member]                                                |           |   |
| Income Loss Not Recognized Under Equity Method Accounting           | 0              | 39,288 |
| Series Five [Member]                                                |           |   |
| Income Loss Not Recognized Under Equity Method Accounting           | 0              | 44,787 |
| Series Six [Member]                                                 |           |   |
| Income Loss Not Recognized Under Equity Method Accounting           | $ 0            | $ 0 |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Amount of income loss not recognized under equity method accounting.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**bctci_IncomeLossNotRecognizedUnderEquityMethodAccounting**Namespace Prefix:**bctci_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**credit**Period Type:**duration |
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Service Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dana S. Philbrook, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-B (Item 601(b)(32)) promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Securities Act) and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act). In accordance with clause
(ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|/s/ DANA S. PHILBROOK                    
|Dana S. Philbrook Chief Financial
Officer
|                                         
|February 10, 2006
# C_2012303EN.01002102.xml

| 6.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/21

---

Order of the President of the Court of 11 July 2012 — European Commission v Czech Republic

(Case C-353/11) (1)

1

2012/C 303/37

Language of the case: Czech

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 252, 27.8.2011.

1

---
Disposition Comments 

Docket No: FAA-2015-3970 0 These comments are in 

Directorate ID: 2015-SW-006-AD response to an SNPRM 

Originating Office Tracking No.: 2014-0145R I 

Next Step: 181 FRAN D SNPRM 

0 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received -If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required. 

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? 

If yes, list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the 

previously published NP RM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point 

for guidance. L_atcst Revision. 

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1 C Chapter 9. 

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: Choose one. 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): Mike May, Airbus Helicopters 

What change to the AD action is requested? Add an option for a pilot to perform an external check for 

cracks in the Fenestron Junction Frame. 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Operators would benefit with a check that can be 

performed by the pilot, that has the same level of safety 

Do we agree? No 

If YES, we agree because Insert jus1ifieation Make the following changes to the AD: List any 

changes to the AD 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with Insert text because Insert justi tical ion We disagree with 

Insert text because Insert justification Make the following changes to the AD: List any 

changes to the AD 

If NO, we don 't agree because the proposed change is premature in that there is still an active 

investigation into the cause of the fatigue crack. 

Page 1 of2 
Signature Section 

Signature indicates concurrence with this action. 

Originating Office Tracking No.: 2014-0145RI (June 13, 2014) 

tk1J 

ASE Printed Name: Robert Grant 1 Da4e 

Bra Date 

Page 2 of2
----

| Delaware                                                          |   | 000-23143               |   | 13-3379479                       |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|----------------------------------|
| (State or other jurisdictionof incorporation)                     |   | (CommissionFile Number) |   | (IRS EmployerIdentification No.) |
|                                                              |   |                    |   |                             |
| 777 Old Saw Mill River Road, Tarrytown, New York                  |   | 10591                   |
| (Address of principal executive offices)                          |   | (Zip Code)              |
| Registrant's telephone number, including area code (914) 789-2800 |
| o | Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
|---|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| o | Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
|---|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| o | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
|---|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| o | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |
|---|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

| Item 5.02. | Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. |
|------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Item 9.01. | Financial Statements and Exhibits. |
|------------|------------------------------------|
| (d)   | Exhibits |
|-----------------|----------|
| Exhibit No. | Description |
|-------------|-------------|
| 10.1 | 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, of the Registrant. |
|------|-----------------------------------------------------------|

----

|   | PROGENICS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. |
|--------|---------------------------------|
|   | By:                             | /s/ ANGELO W. LOVALLO, JR. |
|   |                            | Angelo W. Lovallo, Jr. |
|   |                            | Vice President, Finance & Treasurer |
|   |                            | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
S. 5076 

One Hundred Sixteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty 

An Act 

To authorize the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate to delegate 

authority to approve payroll and personnel actions. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO DELEGATE AUTHORITY TO APPROVE PAYROLL AND PERSONNEL ACTIONS. 

Section 1201 of the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1984 

(2 U.S.C. 6598) is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘all vouchers, for payment of moneys,’’ and 

inserting ‘‘any voucher for payment of moneys, payroll action, 

or personnel action’’; and 

(2) by striking ‘‘any voucher, for payment of moneys,’’ and 

inserting ‘‘any voucher for payment of moneys, payroll action, 

or personnel action’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
# C_2013123EN.01000202.xml

| 27.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 123/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 123/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 March 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the arbeidshof te Antwerpen — Belgium) — Aldegonda van den Booren v Rijksdienst voor Pensioenen

(Case C-127/11) (1)

1

(Social security for migrant workers - Article 46a of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 - National rules against overlapping - Old-age pension - Increase in the amount paid by a Member State - Survivor’s pension - Reduction in the amount paid by another Member State)

2013/C 123/03

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Arbeidshof te Antwerpen

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Aldegonda van den Booren

Applicant:

Defendant: Rijksdienst voor Pensioenen

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Arbeidshof te Antwerpen — Interpretation of Articles 10 EC, 39 EC and 42 EC (now Articles 4(3) TUE, 45 TFEU and 48 TFEU respectively) and Article 46a(3)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community (OJ, English special edition, 1971 (II), p. 416) — Benefits — National anti-overlapping rules — Reduction of the survivor’s pension paid by the first Member State because of an increase in the old-age pension paid by another Member State

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 46a of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of the Council of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community, as amended and updated by Council Regulation (EC) No 118/97 of 2 December 1996, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1386/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2001, must be interpreted as meaning that it does not preclude the application of legislative rules of a Member State containing a provision under which a survivor’s pension received in that Member State is reduced as a result of the increase in an old-age pension received under the legislation of another Member State, provided, in particular, that the conditions set out in Article 46a(3)(d) are observed.

Article 45 TFEU must be interpreted as meaning that it likewise does not preclude the application of such national legislative rules in so far as they do not lead, in respect of the person concerned, to an unfavourable situation in comparison with that of a person whose situation has no cross-border element, and, if such a disadvantage is established, in so far as it is justified by objective considerations and is proportionate in relation to the objective legitimately pursued by national law, this being a matter for the referring court to ascertain.

---

(1)  OJ C 152, 21.5.2011.

1

---
No. 510 October 2005 

HAZCOM HELPER—OSHA VERSION 

COMPLIANCE TOOL FOR OSHA RULE 29 CFR 1910.1200

Objective 

Develop tools that companies can use to comply with 29 CFR 

1910.1200. 

Background 

Occupational Safety an d Health Ad ministration (OSHA) ru le 

29 CFR 1910.1200 (also known as t he Hazard Communication 

Standard) requires all employers having hazardous chemicals in 

their wo rkplaces to d evelop a written h azard co mmunication 

program. Employers must list all these che micals and de scribe 

how th e co mpany will add ress req uirements to (1 ) lab el 

containers used t o st ore hazardous chem icals, (2) obtai n or 

develop Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) for hazardous 

chemicals, (3) pr ovide potentially exposed workers with information about and traini ng in working around hazardous che micals, and (4) provide appropriate protective measures. 

Sample Menu for HazCom Helper 

Approach 

NIOSH pe rsonnel developed t he HazCom Hel per—MSHA 

Version t o help m ining c ompanies w rite t heir HazCom doc uments as required by 30 CFR Part 47. Following many requests 

for the HazCom Helper from companies regulated b y OSHA, 

NIOSH revise d the pr ogram to create the HazCom Helper—

OSHA Version to be m ore compatible with the s pecific needs 

of these nonmining companies. 

This software lead s th e p erson responsible fo r writing a HazCom plan st ep-by-step t hrough i ts prepa ration. Pr ompts and 

suggestions are prov ided to help th e writer fill in th e pro per 

information. The Help menu is also useful. Appendix A assists 

with writing a list of all hazardous chemicals at a site. The program can be saved and recalled at any time so it can be updated 

whenever necessary. 

A CD version of the HazCom program (NIOSH Pub. No. 2005-

135) with an e valuation form can be obtained from the address 

below. It has been reviewed by OSHA and is available on both

the OSHA a nd N IOSH (www.cdc.gov/niosh/mining/topics/ 

chemicalhazards/) Web sites.

For More Information 

Doug Sco tt, Spo kane Resear ch Labo ratory, N IOSH, E. 31 5 

Montgomery Ave, Spok ane, W A 992 07. Call ( 509) 354- 8056 

or e-mail dus3@cdc.gov.

To receive other information about occ upational safety and 

health topics, call 1–800–35–NIOSH (1–800–356–4674), or 

visit the NIOSH Web site at www.cdc.gov/niosh.

Mention of any company name or product does not constitute 

endorsement by the National Institute for Occupational Safety 

and Health. 

DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2006–106
###### Editorial Note on Part 0

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 0 appear at 73 FR 73 FR 54947, Sept. 24, 2008.

#### § 0.139 [Reserved]