alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED
STATES
 SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington,
D.C. 20549
  FORM
8-K
 
 CURRENT
REPORT
 Pursuant
to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
  Date of
Report (Date of earliest event reported)November 17,
2008
  Progenics
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
 (Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
  Delaware
              
              000-23143
              
              13-3379479(State
      or other jurisdiction
                of
      incorporation)
              
              (Commission
                File
      Number)
              
              (IRS
      Employer
                Identification
      No.)777 Old Saw Mill River
      Road, Tarrytown, New York
              
              10591(Address
      of principal executive offices)
              
              (Zip
      Code)Registrant's telephone number,
      including area code(914)
      789-2800
  Check the
appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously
satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following
provisions (seeGeneral
Instruction A.2. below):
   oWritten communications
pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
  oSoliciting material
pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
  oPre-commencement
communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))
  oPre-commencement
communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))
     Item
8.01. Other Events.
 On
November 17, 2008, Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Nasdaq: PGNX) announced that
the Therapeutic Goods Administration of the Australian Government has approved
the registration of RELISTOR®
(methylnaltrexone bromide 12mg/0.6ml solution for injection) for the treatment
of opioid-induced constipation in patients with advanced illness who are
receiving palliative care when response to laxative therapy has not been
sufficient.
 
 A copy of
the press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and the information
contained therein is incorporated by reference into this Item 8.01 of this
Current Report on Form 8-K.
  Item
9.01   Financial Statements and Exhibits.
  (d)
Exhibits
 
 Exhibit
No.     Description
  99.1
                Press
      Release dated November 17,
2008.
  
  SIGNATURES
   Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto
duly authorized.
   PROGENICS
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
 By:/s/ ROBERT A.
MCKINNEY
 Robert A.
McKinney
 Chief Financial Officer, Senior
Vice President,
 Finance & Operations and
Treasurer
    Date: November 17,
2008
Date: Septe mb e r 19 ,20 1 4 Meeting : Venting and F la r · in g Fo llow Up Rulc(s) Discussed: Written Materials? Yes 6J Nam e Or ga ni za ti o n 

### I 

## r 1 I

I I ,( I I 

# !J o; I l Ph o ne N umber
### §80a–5. Subclassification of management companies

#### (a) Open-end and closed-end companies

For the purposes of this subchapter, management companies are divided into open-end and closed-end companies, defined as follows:

(1) "Open-end company" means a management company which is offering for sale or has outstanding any redeemable security of which it is the issuer.

(2) "Closed-end company" means any management company other than an open-end company.

#### (b) Diversified and non-diversified companies

Management companies are further divided into diversified companies and non-diversified companies, defined as follows:

(1) "Diversified company" means a management company which meets the following requirements: At least 75 per centum of the value of its total assets is represented by cash and cash items (including receivables), Government securities, securities of other investment companies, and other securities for the purposes of this calculation limited in respect of any one issuer to an amount not greater in value than 5 per centum of the value of the total assets of such management company and to not more than 10 per centum of the outstanding voting securities of such issuer.

(2) "Non-diversified company" means any management company other than a diversified company.

#### (c) Loss of status as diversified company

A registered diversified company which at the time of its qualification as such meets the requirements of paragraph (1) of subsection (b) shall not lose its status as a diversified company because of any subsequent discrepancy between the value of its various investments and the requirements of said paragraph, so long as any such discrepancy existing immediately after its acquisition of any security or other property is neither wholly nor partly the result of such acquisition.

(Aug. 22, 1940, ch. 686, title I, §5, 54 Stat. 800; Pub. L. 100–181, title VI, §607, Dec. 4, 1987, 101 Stat. 1261.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1987—Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 100–181 substituted "Closed-end" for "Close-end".

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of Securities and Exchange Commission, with certain exceptions, to Chairman of such Commission, see Reorg. Plan No. 10 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3175, 64 Stat. 1265, set out under section 78d of this title.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 BY CFO

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Power 3 Medical Products, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven
B. Rash, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully compiles with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                          /s/ Steven B. Rash
                                          -------------------------------
                                          Steven B. Rash
                                          Chief Executive Officer,
                                          Power 3 Medical Products, Inc.

November 15, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 49 (Monday, March 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 13663]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5660]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-74,751]


Eaton Corporation, Clutch Division, Auburn, IN; Amended 
Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment 
Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(``Act''), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a 
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance 
on February 14, 2011, applicable to workers of Eaton Corporation, 
Clutch Division, Auburn, Indiana. The notice will be published soon in 
the Federal Register.
    At the request of the State Agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged 
in the production of truck clutches.
    The review shows that on October 17, 2008, an amended certification 
of eligibility to apply for adjustment assistance was issued for all 
workers of Eaton Corporation, Clutch Division, Auburn, Indiana, 
separated from employment on or after December 19, 2008 through 
September 25, 2010. The notice was published in the Federal Register on 
November 3, 2008 (73 FR 65405-65406).
    In order to avoid an overlap in worker group coverage, the 
Department is amending the October 6, 2009 impact date established for 
TA-W-74,751, to read September 26, 2010.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-75,147 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Eaton Corporation, Clutch Division, Auburn, 
Indiana, who became totally or partially separated from employment 
on or after September 26, 2010, through February 14, 2013, and all 
workers in the group threatened with total or partial separation 
from employment on date of certification through two years from the 
date of certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment 
assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as 
amended.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 23rd day of February, 2011.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011-5660 Filed 3-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
##### 



Exhibit 3.4
 
 
 
 
 Louisiana Office Corporation
 Other Offices Board
 
 Place of Meetings
 Annual Meetings Annual Meeting
 Special Meetings
 Notice of Meetings




---



##### 



Quorum
 Adjournments
 Order of Business
  provided however
 -2-




---



##### 



Voting
        -3-




---



##### 



-4-




---



##### 



Inspectors
 
 Powers
 Number, Election, and Terms provided however provided further Classification Meeting
 -5-




---



##### 



Nominations of Directors; Election provided however
 -6-




---



##### 



Place of Meetings
 Regular Meetings
 Special Meetings
 Notice of Meetings
 Quorum and Manner of Acting
 -7-




---



##### 



Resignation provided however
 Removal of Directors
 Compensation of Directors provided however
 
 Appointment and Powers of Executive Committee
 Appointment and Powers of Audit Committee
 -8-




---



##### 



Compensation Committee, Other Committees
 Action by Consent; Participation by Telephone or Similar Equipment
 Changes in Committees; Resignations; Removals provided however
 -9-




---



##### 



Number and Qualification provided however
 Resignations provided however
 Removal provided however
 Vacancies
 Chairman of the Board
 President
 -10-




---



##### 



Executive Vice-President and Vice President
 Treasurer
 Secretary
 Bonds of Officers
 Compensation provided however
 Officers of Operating Companies or Divisions
 -11-




---



##### 



Contracts
 Checks, etc.
 Loans
 Deposits
 
 Stock Certificates -12-
       Lists of Shareholders Entitled to Vote
 Stock Ledger
 Transfers of Common stock
 Lost Certificates
 Fixing of Record Date provided however
 -13-




---



##### 



Beneficial Owners and
 
 The Shaw Group Inc. Corporate Seal
 
  
 Right to Indemnification proceeding
 -14-




---



##### 



provided however
 Right of Claimant to Bring Suit
 Non-Exclusivity of Rights
 -15-




---



##### 





Insurance












-16-
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CLST Holdings, Inc. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
November 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies, in the capacity as indicated below and pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

| |  |  | /s/ROBERT A. KAISERRobert A. Kaiser, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
| |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:
March 11, 2008

---



QuickLinks
#### THE PEOPLE OF THE TERRITORY OF GUAM, Plaintiff-Appellee v. ALLAN FLORES, Defendant-Appellant

Criminal No. 76-003-A

District Court of Guam Appellate Division

January 24, 1978

*464Before DUEÑAS, SMITH and WONG, *District Judges*

PER CURIAM

OPINION

On July 25, 1975, the defendant, Allan Flores, was indicted by the local grand jury for delivering a quantity of marijuana (a controlled substance) in violation of § 626.10 of the Guam Penal Code. On December 12, 1975, the defendant was convicted as charged in the indictment.

Defendant’s first contention that there was insufficient evidence to support the verdict is without merit.

Defendant next argues that the trial court gave an erroneous jury instruction regarding entrapment. The trial court gave a proper instruction on the theory of entrapment (taken from CAL-JIC 4.60). (RT 178.) It is true that the trial court failed to take the language of an additional instruction verbatim from CAL-JIC 4.61 (dealing with whether furnishing the opportunity to commit a crime is entrapment). However, the court on appeal is satisfied that the trial judge accurately stated the law and therefore the jury could not have been confused by this. If defendant had any objection to the entrapment instruction, he should have made it at trial.

Defendant also urges that certain hearsay statements should have been excluded, but he made no objection to these statements at trial. Clearly, a proper objection must have been made at trial. Witkin, California Evidence 2d 1207, *People v. Moore,*91 CR 538, 13 Cal.App.2d 424 (1970).

Finally, defendant was brought to trial within five months after he was indicted. The record does not show that any prejudice resulted from this delay. Under these circumstances the delay is not of constitutional proportion and does not warrant reversal. Affirmed.
#### § 420.22 Prohibition; sanctions.

Any person, firm, corporation or other entity, including a public corporation, body or agency, who shall use, withdraw or divert surface waters of the basin, shall pay such charges therefor as may be required by this resolution. Any violation of this resolution shall be subject to penalty as prescribed under Article 14.17 of the Compact. The Commission may also recover the value (according to the established water pricing schedules of the Commission) of any such use, withdrawal or diversion, and invoke the jurisdiction of the courts to enjoin any further use, withdrawal or diversion, unless all charges under this resolution are paid in full when due.
# C_2007074EN.01003201.xml

| 31.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 74/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 74/32

---

Corrigendum to the call for proposals for modal shift, catalyst, motorways of the sea, traffic avoidance and common learning actions under the second Marco Polo Programme

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 71 of 28 March 2007
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 71 of 28 March 2007

(2007/C 74/12)

On page 61, first paragraph:

for:

‘The call is closing on 4.6.2007.’,

read:

‘The call is closing on 22.6.2007.’.

---
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 28.2



                       REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



To the Board of Directors
of Aames Financial Corporation:

We have examined management's assertion about Aames Financial Corporation's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified in the Mortgage
Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage
Bankers (USAP) as of and for the year ended June 30, 1997 included in the
accompanying management assertion. Management is responsible for Aames Financial
Corporation's compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the
entity's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about Aames Financial Corporation's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does
not provide a legal determination on Aames Financial Corporation's compliance
with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Aames Financial Corporation complied
with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended
June 30, 1997 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ Price Waterhouse LLP
Los Angeles, California
August 25, 1997



August 25, 1997


Price Waterhouse LLP
400 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, California 90071

Ladies and Gentlemen:

        As of and for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1997, Aames Capital
Corporation has complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing
standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform
Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers.  As of and for this same
period, Aames Capital Corporation had in effect a fidelity bond in the amount of
$5 million and an errors and omissions policy in the amount of $20 million.

Sincerely,

        AAMES CAPITAL CORPORATION

/s/ Cary H. Thompson                       /s/ David A. Sklar
--------------------                       ------------------
Cary H. Thompson                           David A. Sklar
Chief Executive Officer                    Executive Vice President-Finance and
                                           Chief Financial Officer


/s/ Dan Relf                               /s/ Mark E. Elbaum     
------------                               -------------------     
Dan Relf                                   Mark E. Elbaum
Executive Vice President-Loan Services     Senior Vice President-Finance
### SUBCHAPTER LXIV—RECREATIONAL DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS
# C_2011152EN.01001002.xml

| 21.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 152/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 152/10

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo (Spain) lodged on 22 February 2011 — Asociación Nacional de Grandes Empresas de Distribución (ANGED) v Federación de Asociaciones Sindicales (FASGA) and Others

(Case C-78/11)

2011/C 152/18

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal Supremo

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Asociación Nacional de Grandes Empresas de Distribución (ANGED)

Applicant:

Defendants: Federación de Asociaciones Sindicales (FASGA), Federación de Trabajadores Independientes de Comercio (FETICO), Federación Estatal de Trabajadores de Comercio, Hostelería, Turismo y Juego de UGT, Federación del Comercio, Hostelería y Turismo de CC.OO

Defendants:

Question referred

Question referred

Does Article 7(1) of Directive 2003/88/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time preclude an interpretation of national legislation which does not permit interruption of a period of leave so that the full period — or the remaining period — can be taken at a later time if a worker is temporarily incapacitated when he is on leave?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2003 L 299, p. 9.

1

---
<PAGE>

                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements of TFC Enterprises, Inc. and in the related Prospectuses of our
report dated March 9, 2001, except for the first three sentences of the last
paragraph of Note 1, as to which the date is April 2, 2001, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of TFC Enterprises, Inc. included
in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2001, as
amended, included in this Form 10-K/A:

Registration Statement Number                   Description
-----------------------------                   -----------

Form S-8 No. 33-78376                 pertaining to the 1993 Employee Stock
                                      Purchase Plan

Form S-8 No. 33-98680                 pertaining to the 1995 Long Term Incentive
                                      Plan

Form S-3 No. 333-50531                registration of 1,135,280 shares of common
                                      stock for issuance of warrants


                                      Ernst & Young LLP

Richmond, Virginia
April 18, 2002
Editorial Note on Part 0
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 0 appear at 73 FR 73 FR 54947, Sept. 24, 2008.

§ 0.10 Attorney General's Advisory Committee of U.S. Attorneys. ( a ) The Attorney General's Advisory Committee of United States Attorneys shall consist of an appropriate number of United States Attorneys, designated by the Attorney General. The membership shall be selected to represent the various geographic areas of the Nation and various sized United States Attorneys' Offices. Members shall serve at the pleasure of the Attorney General, but such service normally shall not exceed three years and shall be subject to adjustment by the Attorney General so as to assure the annual rotation of approximately one-third of the Committee's membership. The United States Attorney for the District of Columbia shall serve as an *ex officio* member of the Committee. The Attorney General may designate additional personnel from United States Attorneys' Offices to serve as members of the Committee.
( b ) The Committee shall make recommendations to the Attorney General, to the Deputy Attorney General and to the Associate Attorney General concerning any matters which the Committee believes to be in the best interests of justice, including, but not limited to, the following: ( 1 ) Establishing and modifying policies and procedures of the Department;
( 2 ) Improving management, particularly with respect to the relationships between the Department and the U.S. Attorneys;
( 3 ) Cooperating with State Attorneys General and other State and local officials for the purpose of improving the quality of justice in the United States;
( 4 ) Promoting greater consistency in the application of legal standards throughout the Nation and at the various levels of government; and
( 5 ) Aiding the Attorney General, the Deputy Attorney General and the Associate Attorney General in formulating new programs for improvement of the criminal justice system at all levels, including proposals relating to legislation and court rules.
( c ) The Attorney General will select from the Committee's membership a chairperson and a vice-chairperson. The Attorney General may establish such subcommittees as deemed necessary to carry out the Committee's objectives. The Committee, in consultation with the Director of the Executive Office for United States Attorneys, will select chairpersons for such subcommittees. United States Attorneys who are not members of the Committee may be included in the membership of subcommittees.
( d ) The Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys shall provide the Committee with such staff assistance and funds as are reasonably necessary to carry out the Committee's responsibilities.
[Order No. 640-76, 41 FR 7748, Feb. 20, 1976, as amended by Order No. 960-81, 46 FR 52340, Oct. 27, 1981; Order No. 3108-2009, 74 FR 47097, Sept. 15, 2009]