### 15841 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 52 / Friday, March 16, 2012 / Notices

USTR–2011–0015. Instructions for submitting business confidentialversions are provided below. Handdelivered submissions will not be accepted. Submissions must be submitted in English to the Chairman of the GSP Subcommittee, Trade Policy Staff Committee, by the deadline set forth in this notice.

All submissions for the GSP Annual Review must conform to the GSP regulations set forth at 15 CFR part 2007, except as modified below. These regulations are available on the USTR Web site at http://www.ustr.gov/tradetopics/trade-development/preferenceprograms/generalized-systempreference-gsp/gsp-program-inf. Any person or party making a submission is strongly advised to review the GSP regulations as well as the GSP Guidebook, which is available at the same link.

To make a submission using www.regulations.gov, enter docket number USTR–2011–0015 in the ‘‘Search’’ field on the home page and click ‘‘Search.’’ The site will provide a search-results page listing all documents associated with this docket. Locate the reference to this notice by selecting ‘‘Notice’’ under ‘‘Document Type’’ in the section on the left hand side of the search-results page, and click on the link entitled ‘‘Submit a Comment’’ on the right-hand side of the page under the heading ‘‘Actions.’’ The www.regulations.gov Web site offers the option of providing comments by filling in a ‘‘Type Comment’’ field or by attaching a document using the ‘‘Upload file(s)’’ field. Given the detailed nature of the information sought by the GSP Subcommittee, it is preferred that submissions be provided in an attached document. When attaching a document, type (1) 2011 GSP Annual Product Review; (2) the product description and related HTS tariff number; (3) ‘‘See attached’’ in the ‘‘Type Comment’’ field on the online submission form, and indicate on the attachment that the document is, ‘‘Written Comments’’

Submissions should not exceed 30 single-spaced, standard letter-size pages in 12-point type, including attachments. Any data attachments to the submission should be included in the same file as the submission itself, and not as separate files.

Each submitter will receive a submission tracking number upon completion of the submissions procedure at www.regulations.gov. The tracking number will be the submitter’s confirmation that the submission was received into www.regulations.gov. The confirmation should be kept for the submitter’s records. USTR is not able to provide technical assistance for the web site. Documents not submitted in accordance with these instructions may not be considered in this review. If unable to provide submissions as requested, please contact the GSP Program at USTR to arrange for an alternative method of transmission. Business Confidential Submissions

A person seeking to request that information contained in a submission from that person be treated as business confidential information must certify that such information is business confidential and would not customarily be released to the public by the submitter. Confidential business information must be clearly designated as such. The submission must be marked ‘‘BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL’’ at the top and bottom of the cover page and each succeeding page, and the submission should indicate, via brackets, the specific information that is confidential. Additionally, ‘‘Business Confidential’’ must be included in the ‘‘Type Comment’’ field.

A person submitting public and business confidential submissions must submit each of them separately in the appropriate docket at www.regulations.gov: One submission containing the clearly-marked business confidential information, and a separate submission containing the public version of the submission, indicating where confidential information has been redacted.

Public versions of all documents relating to the 2011 Annual Review will be made available for public viewing in docket USTR–2011–0015 at www.regulations.gov upon completion of processing and no later than one week after the due date.

William Jackson, Deputy Assistant U.S. Trade Representative for the Generalized System of Preferences, Office of the U.S. Trade Representative.
[FR Doc. 2012–6349 Filed 3–15–12; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 3190–W2–P**

**OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE** 

**Generalized System of Preferences (GSP): Change in Hearing Date for the**  **2011 Annual GSP Product Review**

**AGENCY :**  Office of the United States Trade Representative.

**ACTION :**  Notice of change to hearing date and due date for post-hearing
comments.

**SUMMARY :**  The date of the hearing for the 2011 Annual GSP Product Review is changed to Thursday, March 29, 2012. Post-hearing comments are due Monday, April 16, 2012.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  On February 21, 2012, a notice was published in the Federal Register (77 FR 10034) announcing, inter alia, that the hearing for the 2011 Annual GSP Product Review was scheduled for March 20, 2012 and post-hearing comments were due April 10, 2012. This notice changes the time and date of that hearing to 1 p.m., Thursday, March 29, 2012 and the due date for post-hearing comments to 5 p.m., Monday, April 16, 2012. The hearing will cover only the petitions for new products and CNL waivers that have been previously submitted and accepted for review in the 2011 GSP Annual Review. (See 76 FR 67531 and 77 FR 10034.)

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Tameka Cooper, GSP Program, Office of the United States Trade Representative, 600 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20508. The telephone number is (202) 395–6971; the fax number is (202) 395– 9674, and the email address is Tameka

_Cooper@ustr.eop.gov

. William D. Jackson, Deputy Assistant U.S. Trade Representative for the Generalized System of Preferences and Chair of the GSP Subcommittee of the Trade Policy Staff Committee, Office of the U.S. Trade Representative.
[FR Doc. 2012–6454 Filed 3–15–12; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 3190–W2–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**Notice of Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) Approvals and Disapprovals** 

**AGENCY :**  Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

**ACTION :**  Monthly Notice of PFC Approvals and Disapprovals.

**SUMMARY :**  The FAA publishes a monthly notice, as appropriate, of PFC approvals and disapprovals under the provisions of the Aviation Safety and Capacity Expansion Act of 1990 (Title IX of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990) (Pub. L. 101–508) and Part 158 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 158). This notice is published pursuant to paragraph (d) of § 158.29. In February 2012,there were six applications approved. Additionally, 11 approved amendments to previously approved applications are listed.


### 15842 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 52 / Friday, March 16, 2012 / Notices

PFC Applications Approved

Public Agency: County and City of Yakima, Washington.

Application Number: 12–14–C–00– YKM.

Application Type: Impose and use a PFC.

PFC Level: $4.50. Total PFC Revenue Approved in this Decision: $703,801.

Earliest Charge Effective Date: August 1, 2012.

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: February 1, 2014.

Class of Air Carriers Not Required To Collect PFCs:

Air taxi/commercial operators— nonscheduled/on-demand air carriers filing FAA Form 1800–31.

Determination: Approved. Based on information contained in the public agency’s application, the FAA has determined that the approved class accounts for less than 1 percent of the total annual enplanements at Yakima Air Terminal—McAllister Field Airport. Brief Description of Projects Approved for Collection and Use

Snow removal equipment purchase— design.

Terminal apron rehabilitation— design.

Taxiway Alpha and connectors rehabilitation—design.

Snow removal equipment purchase. Terminal apron rehabilitation. Taxiway Alpha and connectors rehabilitation.

Acquire runway friction tester (decelerometer).

Acquire miscellaneous equipment. Environmental mitigation. Security enhancement. Decision Date: February 2, 2012.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Mary Vargas, Seattle Airports District Office, (425) 227–2660.

Public Agency: City of Modesto, California.

Application Number: 12–08–C–00– MOD.

Application Type: Impose and use a PFC.

PFC Level: $4.50. Total PFC Revenue Approved in this Decision: $111,806.

Earliest Charge Effective Date: April 1,
2012.

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: December 1, 2012.

Class of Air Carriers Not Required to Collect PFC’S: None. Brief Description of Projects Approved for Collection and Use

Conduct miscellaneous studies. Procure Americans with Disabilities Act lift. Reconstruct northwest apron. Construct new windsocks. Construct new perimeter security fence.

Environmental study. PFC administration costs. Brief Description of Withdrawn Projects

Apron rehabilitation. Enhance runway safety area. Date of Withdrawal: February 9, 2012. Decision Date: February 10, 2012.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Arlene Draper, San Francisco Airports District Office, (650) 827–7602.

Public Agency: City of Columbia, Missouri.

Application Number: 12–03–C–00– COU.

Application Type: Impose and use a PFC.

PFC Level: $4.50. Total PFC Revenue Approved in this Decision: $2,140,461.

Earliest Charge Effective Date: February 1, 2013.

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: December 1, 2026.

Class of Air Carriers Not Required To Collect PFCs: None. Brief Description of Projects Approved for Collection and Use

Airport master plan update. Wildlife management assessment of hazards.

Environmental assessment. Terminal restroom renovation. Taxiway A reconstruction. Snow removal equipment. Update airport exhibit A property
map.

Aircraft rescue and firefighting truck. PFC audit fees. Brief Description of Projects Approved for Collection

Expand air carrier auto parking lot. Wildlife deterrent fence. Airport land acquisition. Rehabilitate runway 13/31 and taxiway B.

Extend runway 13/31 and taxiway B. Re-align Route H and Rangeline Road. Extend runway 2/20 and navigational aids.

Aircraft rescue and firefighting building expansion.

Decision Date: February 10, 2012.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Todd Madison, Central Region Airports Division, (816) 329–2640.

Public Agency: City of Midland, Texas.

Application Number: 12–06–C–00– MAF.

Application Type: Impose and use a PFC.

PFC Level: $4.50. Total PFC Revenue Approved in this Decision: $1,319,287.

Earliest Charge Effective Date: August 1, 2015.

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: May 1, 2016.

Classes of Air Carriers Not Required to Collect PFCs:

(1) Part 135 air taxi/commercial operators filing FAA Form 1800–31; (2) commuter and small certificated air carriers filing Department of Transportation Form T–100 for nonscheduled operations; and (3) large certificated route air carriers filing Department of Transportation Form T– 100 for non-scheduled operations.

Determination: Approved. Based on information contained in the public agency’s application, the FAA has determined that each approved class accounts for less than 1 percent of the total annual enplanements at Midland International Airport. Brief Description of Projects Approved for Collection and Use

Terminal building rehabilitation. Executive apron reconstruction. Northwest taxilane and emergency perimeter roadway extension.

Wildlife hazard assessment. Runways 4/22 and 16U34R rehabilitation design.

Emergency perimeter roadway and gates rehabilitation.

Airport drainage improvements— phase 1.

Entrance road guidance signage rehabilitation.

Airport radio communication system upgrade.

Airfield lighting cable replacement. Taxiway V apron expansion. Decision Date: February 13, 2012.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Marcelino Sanchez, Texas Airports Development Office, (817) 222–5652.

Public Agency: County of Pitkin, Aspen, Colorado.

Application Number: 12–08–C–00– ASE.

Application Type: Impose and use a PFC.

PFC Level: $4.50. Total PFC Revenue Approved in this Decision: $3,211,592.

Earliest Charge Effective Date: August 1, 2012.

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: February 1, 2016.

Class of Air Carriers Not Required to Collect PFCs: Nonscheduled/on-demand air carriers filing FAA Form 1800–31.

Determination: Approved. Based on information contained in the public agency’s application, the FAA has determined that the approved class accounts for less than 1 percent of the


### 15843 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 52 / Friday, March 16, 2012 / Notices

total annual enplanements at Aspen/ Pitkin County Airport. Brief Description of Projects Approved for Collection and Use

Acquire snow removal equipment (plow).

Extend runway 15/33. Construct connector taxiway. Construct south deice pad apron. Improve runway safety area. PFC application and administration fees.

Decision Date: February 17, 2012.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Jesse Lyman, Denver Airports District Office, (303) 342–1262. Public Agency: City of Klamath Falls, Oregon.

Application Number: 12–03–C–00– LMT.

Application Type: Impose and use a PFC.

PFC Level: $4.50. Total PFC Revenue Approved in This Decision: $987,785.

Earliest Charge Effective Date: April 1,
2012.

Estimated Charge Expiration Date: October 1, 2023.

Class of Air Carriers Not Required To Collect PFCs: None. Brief Description of Projects Approved for Collection and Use

Terminal enhancements. Security enhancements. Construct north end perimeter road. Conduct miscellaneous studies. Rehabilitate runway 14/32. Rehabilitate runway 7/25. Environmental mitigation. Acquire snow removal equipment. PFC administration costs.

Decision Date: February 27, 2012.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Trang Tran, Seattle Airports District Office, (425) 227–1662.



### AMENDMENTS TO 

### PFC APPROVALS

Amendment No., City, State Amendment approved date Original approved net PFC revenue Amended approved net PFC revenue Original estimated charge exp. date Amended estimated charge exp. date

03–06–C–01–ACV; Arcata, CA. .......................................... 2/01/12 $578,450 $523,597 03/01/05 03/01/05 05–07–C–01–ACV; Arcata, CA. .......................................... 2/02/12 392,265 336,981 10/01/05 10/01/05 09–03–C–02–PGV; Greenville, NC. .................................... 2/03/12 596,985 396,985 10/01/11 10/01/11 03–02–C–01–MCW; Mason City, IA. ................................... 2/08/12 379,500 303,061 02/01/12 02/01/12 08–07–C–01–MOD; Modesto, CA. ...................................... 2/10/12 395,134 337,634 12/01/15 04/01/12 99–02–C–07–MCI; Kansas City, MO. ................................. 2/14/12 7,375,439 6,741,254 05/01/11 04/01/11 09–09–C–02–BUR; Burbank, CA. ....................................... 2/16/12 21,965,000 24,965,000 05/01/15 09/01/15 09–06–C–01–PUW; Pullman, WA. ...................................... 2/17/12 255,998 271,077 05/01/11 12/01/10 10–11–C–02–ATL; Atlanta, GA. .......................................... 2/21/12 422,480,178 347,373,302 01/01/23 07/01/22 94–01–C–04–RIC; Richmond, VA. ...................................... 2/23/12 11,847,867 11,846,842 05/01/98 05/01/98 01–04–C–04–RIC; Richmond, VA. ...................................... 2/23/12 3,401,433 2,647,868 11/01/16 114/01/16

Issued in Washington, DC on March 8,
2012. Joe Hebert, Manager, Financial Analysis and Passenger Faculty Charge Branch.
[FR Doc. 2012–6315 Filed 3–15–12; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–M**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**National Highway Traffic Safety Administration** 

**Petition for Exemption From the Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard;**  **Nissan**

**AGENCY :**  National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) Department of Transportation (DOT).

**ACTION :**  Grant of petition for exemption.

**SUMMARY :**  This document grants in full Nissan North America, Inc.’s (Nissan) petition for exemption of the Juke vehicle line in accordance with 49 CFR Part 543, Exemption from Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard. This petition is granted, because the agency has determined that the antitheft device to be placed on the line as standard equipment is likely to be as effective in reducing and deterring motor vehicle theft as compliance with the partsmarking requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard (49 CFR part 541). Nissan requested confidential treatment of specific information in its petition by letter dated November 29, 2011. The agency addressed Nissan’s request for confidential treatment by letter dated December 29, 2011.

**DATES :**  The exemption granted by this notice is effective beginning with the 2013 model year (MY).

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Ms. Carlita Ballard, Office of International Policy, Fuel Economy and Consumer Programs, NHTSA, West Building, W43–439, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. Ms. Ballard’s telephone number is (202) 366–5222. Her fax number is (202) 493–2990.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  In a petition dated November 29, 2011, Nissan requested an exemption from the parts-marking requirements of the Theft Prevention Standard (49 CFR part 541) for the MY 2013 Nissan Juke vehicle line. The petition requested an exemption from parts-marking pursuant to 49 CFR part 543, Exemption from Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard, based on the installation of an antitheft device as standard equipment for the entire vehicle line.

Under § 543.5(a), a manufacturer may petition NHTSA to grant an exemption for one vehicle line per model year. In its petition, Nissan provided a detailed description and diagram of the identity, design and location of the components of the antitheft device for the Juke vehicle line. Nissan will install a passive transponder-based, electronic immobilizer, antitheft device as standard equipment on its Juke vehicle line beginning with MY 2013. Major components of the antitheft device will include an engine control module, immobilizer/body control module (BCM), immobilizer antenna and a security indicator light. Nissan will also install an audible and visible alarm system on the Juke as standard equipment. Nissan stated that activation of the immobilization device occurs automatically when the ignition key is turned to the ‘‘OFF’’ position and all the doors are closed and locked through the use of the key or the remote control mechanism. Deactivation occurs when all the doors are unlocked with the key or remote control mechanism. Nissan’s submission is considered a complete petition as required by 49 CFR 543.7, in that it meets the general requirements