**SUPPORTING STATEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY**  **NESHAP for Area Sources: Electric Arc Furnace Steelmaking Facilities (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart YYYYY) (Renewal)**  **1. Identification of the Information Collection 1(a) Title of the**  **Information Collection** NESHAP for Area Sources: Electric Arc Furnace Steelmaking Facilities (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart YYYYY) (Renewal) , EPA ICR Number 2277.04 , OMB Control Number 2060

- 0608

. **1(b) Short Characterization/Abstract** The National Emission S tandards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for the regulations published at 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart YYYYY were proposed on September 20, 2007 , and promulgated on December 28, 2007 . These regulations apply to existing and new Electric Arc Furnace (EAF) steelmaking facilities that are area sources of hazardous air pollutants (HAP) emissions

. The standard establishes particulate matter (PM) emission limits for control devices and opacity limits for melt shops, pollution prevention requirements for ferrou s scrap that is melted in EAFs, and monitoring, reporting, and recordkeeping requirements. New facilities include tho se that commenced construction or reconstruction after the date of proposal. This information is being collected to assure compliance with 40 CFR P art 63, S ubpart YYYYY

. In general, all NESHAP standards require initial notifications, performance tests, and periodic reports by

the owners/operators of the affected facilities. They are also required to maintain records of the occurrence and duration of any startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the operation of an affected facility , or any period during which the monitoring sy stem is inoperative. These notifications, reports, and records are essential in determining compliance, and are require d of all affected facilities subject to NESHAP. Any owner/operator subject to the provisions of this part shall maintain a file of these measurements, and retain the file for at least five years following the date of such measurements, maintenance repor

ts, and records. All reports are sent to the delegated state or local authority . In the event that there is no such delegated authority, the reports are sent directly to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regional office. Based on our consultations with industry representatives, there is an average of one affected facility at each plant site and that each plant site has only one respondent (i.e., the owner/operator of the plant site). Over the next three ye ars, an averag e of 87 respondents per ye ar will be subject to the standard , and no additional respondents per year will become subject to the standard. The estimate was obtained b y consulting industry during the renewal of this current I CR. The Office of Management and Budget ( OMB ) approved the currentl y active I CR2

without any “ Terms of Clearance. ” There are approximately 87 EAF steelmaking facilities in the United States, which are all owned and operated b y the iron and steel mill industry . None of the facilities are owned by state, local, tribal or the Federal government. They are all owned and operated by privately owned, fo r - profit businesses. The burden to the “Affected Public” may be found in Table 1 : Annual Respondent Burden and Cost

– NESHAP for Area Sources: Electric Arc Furnace Steelmaking Facilities (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart YYYYY) (Renewal)

. T he “Federal Government” burden is attributed entirel y to work performed b y federal employees or government contractor s and may be found in Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost

– NESHAP for Area Sources: Electric Arc Furnace Steelmaking Facilities (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart YYYYY) (Renewal)

. **2. Need for and Use of the Collection 2(a) Need/Authority for the Collection**  The EPA is charged under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act, as amended, to establish standards of performance for each category or subcategory

of major sources and area sources of hazardous air pollutants. These standards are applicable to new or existing sources of hazardous air pollutants and shall require the maximum degree of emission reduction. In addition, section 114(a) states that the Administrator m ay require any

owner/operator subject to any requirement of this Act to: (A) Establish and maintain such records; (B) make such reports;

(C) install, use, and maintain such monitoring equipment, and use such audit procedures, or methods; (D) sample such emissions (in accordance with such procedures or methods, at such locations, at such intervals, during such periods, and in such manner as the Administrator shall prescribe); (E) keep records on control equipment parameters, production variables or other indirect data when direct monitoring of emissions is impractical; (F) submit compliance certifications in accordance with Section 114(a)(3); and (G) provide such other information as the Admini strator may reasonabl y require. In the Administrator's judgment , HAP emissions from EAF steelmaking facilities cause or contribute to air pollution that may reasonabl y be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare. Therefore, the NESHAP were promulgated for this source category at 40 CFR P art 63, S ubpart YYYYY

. **2(b) Practical Utility/Users of the Data** The recordkeeping and reporting requirements in the standard ensure compliance with the applicable regulations which where promulgated in accordance with the Clean Air Act. The collected information is also use d for targeting inspections and as evidence in legal proceedings.3

Performance tests are required in order to determine an affected facility ’ s initial capability to comply

with the emission standard. Continuous e mission monitors are used to ensure complian ce with the standard at all times. During the performance test a record of the operating parameters under which compliance was achieved may be recorded and used to determine compliance in place of a continuous emission monitor. The notifications required in the standard are used to inform the Agency or delegated authority when a source becomes subject to the requirements of the regulations. The reviewing authority may then inspect the source to check if the pollution control devices are properl y installed and operated , leaks are being detected and repaired , and the standard are being met. The performance test may also be observed. The required semiannual reports are used to determine periods of excess emissions, identify problems at the facility , verify operation/maintenance procedures and for compliance determinations. **3. Nonduplication, Consultations, and Other Collection Criteria** The requested recordkeeping and reporting are required under 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart YYYYY

. **3(a) Nonduplication** If the subject standards have not been delegated, the information is sent directl y to the appropriate EPA regional office. Otherwise, the information is sent directl y to the delegated state or local agency . If a state or local agency has adopted its own similar standards to implement the Federal standards, a cop y of the report submitted to the state or local agency can be sent to the Administrator in lieu of the report required by the Federal standards. Therefore, no duplication exists. **3(b) Public No tice Required Prior to ICR Submission to OMB**  An announcement of a public comment period for the renewal of this I CR was published in the Federal Register ( 78 FR 3 5023 ) on June 11 , 2013

. No comments were received on the burden published in the Federal Register

. **3(c) Consultations** The Agency ’s industry

experts have been consulted, and the Agency ’s internal data sources and projections of industry growth over the next three years have been considered. The primary source of information as reported b y industry , in compliance with the recordkeeping and reporting provisions in the standard, is the Online Tracking Information System (OTI S) which is operated and maintained by EPA's Office of Compliance. OTIS is EPA’s database for the collection, maintenance, and retrieval of all complianc e data. The growth rate for the industry is4

based on our consultations with the Agency ’s internal industry experts. Industry trade associations and other interested parties were provided an opportunity to comment on the burden associated with the standard as it was being developed and the standard has been previously

reviewed to determine the minimum information needed for compliance purposes. In developing this I CR, we contacted both the Steel Manufacturers Association (SMA) at (202) 296

- 1515 and the American Iron and Steel Institute at (202) 452

- 7180

. The SMA estimated the number of EAF facilities has decreased from 91 to 87 since the last ICR renewal period, due to changes in industry (including facility

closure as well as startup). We have revised the number of respondents based on the comment received

. It is our policy

to respond after a thorough review of comments received since the last ICR renewal as well as those submitted in response to the first Federal Register notice. **3(d) Effects of Less Frequent Collection**  Less frequent information collection would decrease the margin of assurance that facilities are continuing to meet the standards. Requirements for information gathering and recordkeeping are useful techniques to ensure that good operation and maintenance practices are applied and emission limitations are met. If the information required by these standards was collected less frequentl y, the proper operation and maintenance of control equipment and the possibility

of detecting viol ations would be less likely

. **3(e) General Guidelines**
T hese reporting or recordkeeping requirements do not violate any of the regulations promulgated b y OMB under 5 CFR P art 1320, S ection 1320.5. These standards require the respondents to maintain all records, including reports and notifications for at least five years. This is consistent with the General Provisions as applied to the standards. EPA believes that the five ye ar records retention requirement is consistent the Part 70 permit program and the five year statute of limitations on which the permit program is based. The retention of records for five ye ars allows EPA to establish the compliance history of a source, an y pattern of non

- compliance and to determine the appropriate level of enforcement action. EPA has found that the most flagrant violators have violations extending beyond five ye ars. In addition, EPA would be prevented from pursuing the violators due to the destruction or nonexistence of essential records. **3(f) Confidentiality** Any information submitted to the Agency for which a claim of confidentiality is made will be safeguarded according to the Agency policies set forth in Title 40, chapter 1, part 2, subpart B

- Confidentiality of Business Information (see 40 CFR 2; 41 FR 36902 , September 1, 1976; amended b y 43 FR 40000, September 8, 1978; 43 FR 42251, September 20, 1978; 44 FR 17674, March 23, 1979).5

**3(g) Sensitive Questions**
T he reporting or recordkeeping requirements in the standard do not include sensitive questions. **4. The Respondents and the Information Requested**  **4(a) Respondents/SIC Codes** The respondents to the recordkeeping and reporting requirements are EAF steelmaking facilities . The United States Standard Industrial Classification ( SI C ) code for the respondents affected b y the standards is SI C 3312 , which corresponds to the North American Industry Classification System (NAI CS ) code 331111 for Iron and Steel Mills. **4(b) Information Requested (i) Data Items** 
In this ICR , all the data that is recorded or reported is required by the NESHAP for Area Sources: Electric Arc Furnace Steelmaking Facilities (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart YYYYY)

. A source must make the following reports:

**Notifications/ Reports**  Scrap management and pollution prevention plan 63.10685(a)(1) and (b)(1) Startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan 63.6(e)(3) Notification of applicability 63.9(b)(1) Notification and application of construction or reconstruction 63.9(b)(4) Compliance extension 63.9(c) Notification of special requirements 63.9(d) Notification of performance test 63.9(e) Notification of opacity and visible emission observations 63.9(f) Additional COMS notifications 63.9(g) Notification of compliance status 63.10690(b) and 63.9(h) Semiannual compliance report addressing: 1) the number of mercury switches removed or the weight of mercury recovered from the switches and properl y managed, the estimated number of vehicles processed, an 63.10685(c)6
**Notifications/ Reports**  estimate of the percent of mercury switches recovered, and a certificatio n that the recovered mercury switches were recycled at RCRA

- permitted facilities ; and 2) the control of contaminants from scrap according to the requirements in §63.10(e) Startup, shutdown, malfunction report 63.10(d)(5)(ii)
A source must keep the following records: **Recordkeeping** Notifications and reports 63.10685(c) , 63.10(b)(2)(xiv) Startups, shutdowns, malfunctions 63.6(e)(1)(iii)

- (v) Performance tests, performance evaluations, and opacity observations 63.10686 ,

63.10(b)(2)(viii)

- (ix) Emission/operating limits 63.10(b)(2)(vii) Scrap management requirements 63.10685(c) and 63.10(b)(2)(iii) Continuous monitoring sy stems 63.10(b)(2)(vi)

- (vii), (x)

- (xi) 63.10(c); 63.6(h)(7); 63.8(d)(3) Electronic Reporting Some of the respondents are using monitoring equipment that automatically records parameter data. Although personnel at the affected facility must still evaluate the data, internal automation has significantly reduced the burden associated with monitoring and recordkeeping at a plant site. Also, regulatory

agencies in cooperation with th e respondents continue to create reporting sy stems to transmit data electronically . However, electronic reporting s ys tems are still not widely used. At this time, it is est imated that approximately 10 percent of the respon dents use electronic reporting.

**(ii) Respondent Activities**

**Respondent Activities**7 **Respondent Activities** Read instructions. Install, calibrate, maintain, and operate CMS for opacity , or for pressure drop and liquid supply pressure
. Perform initial performance test and repeat performance tests if necessary

. Write the notifications and reports listed above. Enter information required to be recorded above. Submit the required reports developing, acquiring, installing, and utilizing technology and sy stems for the purpose of collecting, validating, and verifying information. Develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and sy stems for the purpose of processing and maintaining information. Develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and sy stems for the purpose of disclosing and providing information. Train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information. Transmit, or otherwise disclose the information. Currently sources are using monitoring and reporting equipment that provide parameter data in an automated way , e.g., continuous parameter monitoring s ys tem. Although personnel at the source still need to evaluate the data, this type of monitoring equipment has significantly reduced the burden associated with monitoring and recordkeeping. **5. The Information Collected: Agency Activities, Collection Methodology, and Information Management**  **5(a) Agency Activities** EPA conducts the following activities in connection with the acquisition, analy sis, storage, and distribution of the required information. **Agency Activities** Review notifications and reports, including performance test reports, and excess emissions reports, required to be submitted by industry

. Audit facility records.8 **Agency Activities** Input, anal yz e, and maintain data in the Online Tracking Information Sy stem (OTI S). **5(b) Collection Methodology and Management** Following notification of startup, the reviewing authority could inspect the source to determine whether the pollution control devices are p roperl y installed and operated. Performance test reports are used b y the Agency to discern a source ’ s initial capability to comp ly with the emission standard, and note the operating conditions under which compliance was achieved. Data and records maintained by the respondents are tabulated and published for use in compliance and enforcement programs. The semiannual reports are used for problem identification, as a check on source operation and maintenance, and for compliance determinations.
In formation contained in the reports is entered into OTI S which is operated and maintained by

EPA's Office of Compliance. OT IS is EPA ’ s database for the collection, maintenance, and retrieval of compliance data for approximately 125,000 industrial and government

- owned facilities. EPA uses OTI S for tracking air pollution compliance and enforcement b y local and state regulatory agencies, EPA regional offices and EPA headquarters. EPA and its delegated Authoritie s can edit, store, retrieve and analyze the data. The records required b y this regulation must be retained by the owner/operator for five ye ars. **5(c) Small Entity Flexibility** A small entity

for this industry

is defined by

the Small Business Administration as a firm having no more than 1,000 employees. Of all facilities that will be subject to the rule, only a few facilities are considered to be small entities. Although the st andard would not have a significant economic impact on the small entities, we tried to reduce the impact of the rule on small facilities. EPA met with industry trade associations and company representatives to address any small business concerns during de velopment of the final rule. **5(d) Collection Schedule** The specific frequency

for each information collection activity within this request is shown in below Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost

– NESHAP for Area Sources: Electric Arc Furnace Stee lmaking Facilities (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart YYYYY) (Renewal)

. **6. Estimating the Burden and Cost of the Collection**9

Table 1 documents the computation of individual burdens for the recordkeeping and reporting requirements applicable to the industry for the subpart included in this I CR. The individual burdens are expressed under standardized headings believed to be consistent with the concept of burden under the Paperwork Reduction Act. Where appropriate, specific tasks and major assumptions have been identified. Responses to this information collection are mandatory

. The Agency

may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB Control Number. **6(a) Estimating Resp ondent Burden**  The average annual burden to industry over the next three years from these recordkeeping and reporting requirement s is estimated to be 1,4 17 ( Total Labor Hours from Table 1). T hese hours are based on Agency studies and background documents from the development of the regulation, Agency

knowledge and experience with the NESHAP program, the previously approved ICR, and any comments received. **6(b) Estimating Respondent Costs (i) Estimating Labor Costs**  This I CR uses the following labor rates: Managerial $ 127.43 ($ 60.68 + 110%) Technical $ 99.16 ($ 47.22 + 110%) Clerical $ 50.88 ($ 24.23 + 110%) These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, December 2013 , “ Table 2. Civilian Workers, by occupational and industry group. ” The rates are from column 1, “ Total compensation. ” The rates have been increased b y 110 percent to account for the benefit packages available to those employed by private industry

. **(ii) Estimating Capital/Startup and Operation and Maintenance Costs**  The only costs to the regulated industry resulting from information collection activities required b y the subject standard are labor costs. There are no capital/startup or operation and maintenance costs.

**(iii) Capital/S tartup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs**  The only type of industry costs associated with the information collection activity in the regulations are labor costs. There are no capital/startup or operation and maintenance costs. **6(c) Estimating Ag ency Burden and Cost** 10

The only costs to the Agency

are those costs associated with anal ys is of the reported information. EPA's overall compliance and enforcement program includes activities such as the examination of records maint ained by the respondents, periodic inspection of sources of emissions, and the publication and distribution of collected information. The average annual Agency cost during the three years of the ICR is estimated to be $ 7,515

. This cost is based on the average hourl y labor rate as follows: Managerial $ 6 2.27 (GS

- 13, Step 5, $ 3 8. 92 + 60% ) Technical $ 4 6

. 21 (GS

- 12, Step 1, $ 28. 88 + 60% ) Clerical $2 5.01 (GS

- 6, Step 3, $ 15. 63 + 60% ) These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) , 20 1 3 General Schedule , which excludes locality

rates of pay

. The rates have been increased by 60 percent to account for the benefit packages available to government employees
. Details upon which this estimate is based appear below in Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cos t

– NESHAP for Area Sources: Electric Arc Furnace Steelmaking Facilities (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart YYYYY) (Renewal)

. **6(d) Estimating the Respondent Universe and Total Burden and Costs** Based on our research for this I CR, on average over the next three ye ars, approximately 87 existing respondents will be subject to the standard. It is estimated that no additional respondents per ye ar will become subject. The overall average number of re spondents, as shown in the table below , is 87 per year. The number of respondents is calculated using the following table that addresses the three ye ars covered b y this ICR.
**Number of Respondents**

Respondents That Submit Reports Respondents That Do Not Submit Any Reports

Year (A) Number of Ne w Respondents 1 (B)

Number of Existing Respondents (C)

Number of Existing Respondents that keep records but do not submit reports (D) Number of Existing Respondents That Are Also New Respondents (E)

Number of Respondents (E=A+B+C

- D)

1 0 87 0 0 87

2 0 87 0 0 8711 **Number of Respondents**
3 0 87 0 0 87
Average 0 87 0 0 87
1 New respondents include sources with constructed, reconstructed and modified affected facilities. C olumn D is subtracted to avoid double

- counting respondents

. As shown above, the average Number of Respondents over the three ye ar period of this ICR is 87

. The total number of annual responses per ye ar is calculated using the following table:
**Total Annual Responses** (A) Information Collection Activity (B) Number of Respondents (C)

Number of Responses (D)

Number of Existing Respondents That Keep Records But Do Not Submit Reports (E) Total Annual Responses E=(BxC)+D
Prepare scrap plan and scrap specifications 0 0 N/A 0 Initial performance tests 0 0 N/A 0 Notification of compliance status 0 0 N/A 0 Request for compliance extension 0 0 N/A 0 Notification of performance test 0 0 N/A 0 SSM report 29 1 N/A 29 Semiannual excess emissions reports 87 2 N/A 174 TO TAL (rounded) 203 The number of Total Annual Responses is 203

. The total annual labor costs are $ 136 , 341

. Details regarding these estimates may be found below in Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost

– NESHAP for Area Sources: Electric Arc Furnace Steelmaking Facilities (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart YYYYY) (Renewal)

. **6(e) Bottom Line Burden Hours and Cost Tables** The detailed bottom line burden hours and cost calculations for the respondents and the Agency are shown in Tables 1 and 2, respectivel y, an d summarized below. **(i) Respondent Tally**12

The total annual labor hours are 1,4 17

. Details regarding these estimates may be found in Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost

– NESHAP for Area Sources: Electric Arc Furnace Steelmaking Facilities (40 CF R Part 63, Subpart YYYYY) (Renewal)

. Furthermore, the annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 7 hours per response

. The total annual capital/startup and O& M costs to the regulated entity are $0

. The cost calculations are detailed in Section 6(b)(iii), Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs. **(ii) The Agency Tally** The average annual Agency burden and cost over next three years is estimated to be 1 67 labor hours at a cost of $ 7,515 . See Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost

– NESHAP for Area Sources: Electric Arc Furnace Steelmaking Facilities (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart YYYYY) ( Renewal)

. **6(f) Reasons for Change in Burden** There is a decrease in the respondent burden and an increase in Agency burden. These changes occurred due to the following adjustment: 1) This I CR revises the number of respondents from 91 to 87 based on input provided from industry trade association; and 2) This ICR corrects the frequency of semiannual report review from one to two in Table 2. This correction results in an increase in the estimated Agency burden. **6(g) Burden Statement** The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 7 hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended b y persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose o r provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and s ys tems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and mai ntaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing way s to compl y with any previously

applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; comp lete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. An agency

may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Numbers for EPA regulations are listed at 40 CFR P art 9 and 48 CFR C hapter 15. To comment on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided13

burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burd en, including the use of automated collection techniques, EPA has established a public docket for this I CR under Docket ID Number EPA

–HQ

–OECA

–2013

–0323

. An electronic version of the public docket is available at http://www.regulations.gov/ which may be us ed to obtain a copy

of the draft collection of information, submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically

. When in the sy stem , select “search,” then key in the docket ID number identified in this document. The documents are also available for public viewing at the Enforcement and Compliance Docket and Information Center in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room 3334 , 1301 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holiday s. The telephone number for the Reading Room is (202) 566

- 1744, and the telephone number for the docket center i s (202) 566

- 1927

. Also, you can send comments to the Office of In formation and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20503, Attention: Desk Officer for EPA. Please include the EPA Docket ID Number EPA

- HQ

- OECA

- 20 13

–0323 and OMB Control Number 2060

- 0608 in any correspondence. **Part B of the Supporting Statement** This part is not applicable because no statistical methods were used in collecting this information.14

**Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost**

**– NESHAP for Area Sources: Electric Arc Furnace Steelmaking Facilities (40**  **CFR Part 63, Subpart YYYYY) (Renewal)**

**Burden item (A)**  **Person hours per**  **occurrence (B)** 

**No. of occurrences**  **per respondent**  **per year (C)** 

**Person hours per**  **respondent per year (A x**  **B) (D)** 

**Respondents per year**  **a (E)** 

**Technica l person** 
**** **hours per year**  **(C x D) (F)** 

**Managem ent**  **person hours per year (E**  **x0.05) (G)** 

**Clerical person**  **hours per year**  **(E x 0.1) (H)** 

**Total Cost per year**  **b**
1. Applications N/A 2. Surveys and Studies N/A 3. Acquisition, Installation, and Utilization of Technology and Systems N/A
4. Reporting Requirements A. Read instructions d 8 1 8 0 0 0 0 $0 B. Required activities Prepare scrap plan and scrap specifications d 4 1 4 0 0 0 0 $0 Initial performance tests c C. Create information See 4B D. Gather existing information See 4B E. Write report See 4B Initial notification of applicability d 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 Notification of compliance status d 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 Request for compliance extension N/A Notification of performance test c Startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan/reports 4 1 4 29 116 5.8 11.6 $12,832.12 Semiannual excess emissions reports 2 2 4 87 348 17.4 34.8 $38,496.35 **Subtotal for Reporting**  **Requirements 533.6**  **$51,328.47** 5. Recordkeeping Requirements15

**Burden item (A)**  **Person hours per**  **occurrence (B)** 

**No. of occurrences**  **per respondent**  **per year (C)** 

**Person hours per**  **respondent per year (A x**  **B) (D)** 

**Respondents per year**  **a (E)** 

**Technica l person** 
**** **hours per year**  **(C x D) (F)** 

**Managem ent**  **person hours per year (E**  **x0.05) (G)** 

**Clerical person**  **hours per year**  **(E x 0.1) (H)** 

**Total Cost per year**  **b**

A. Read instructions See 4A B. Plan activities See 4A C. Implement activities See 4A D. Develop record system d 4 1 4 0 0 0 0 $0 E. Time to enter information 0.5 52 26 29 754 37.7 75.4 $83,408.76 F. Time to transmit or disclose information 0.25 2 0.5 29 14.5 0.73 1.45 $1,604.01 G. Time to adjust existing ways d 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0 F. Time to train personnel d 4 1 4 0 0 0 0 $0 G. Time for audits N/A **Subtotal for Recordkeeping**  **Requirements 883.8**  **$85,012.78 TOTAL ANNUAL BURDEN AND COST**  **(ROUNDED) 1,417**  **$136,341.25**
N/A = Not Applicable. **Assu mptions:** 
a There are 87 EAF steelmaking facilities. The average number of respondents per year for one

- time events over the 3

- year period of the ICR is 29

. b This ICR uses the following labor rates: $127.43 for managerial labor, $99.16 for technical labor, and $50.88 for cleri cal labor. These rates are from the U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, December 2013. The rates have been increased by 60 percent to account for o verhead.
c All plants have conducted performance tests during the implementation period of the rule

. d After full implementation, existing facilities are not expected to experience any burden from these activities and no new fac ilities are expected to become subject to the rule over the 3

- year period.16

**Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost** 

**– NESHAP for Area Sources: Electric Arc Furnace Steelmaking Facilities (40**  **CFR Part 63, Subpart YYYYY) (Renewal)**

**Activity (A) EPA**  **person**   ** hours per** **occurrence (B) No. of** 

**occurrences per plant per**  **year (C) EPA** 

**person**   ** hours** **per plant**  **per year (AxB)**  **(D)**

**Plants per**  **year a**  **(E)**

**Technical person**  **** **hours per year (CxD)**  **(F)**

**Managem ent**  **person -**  **hours per year**  **(Ex0.05) (G)** 

**Clerical person**  **** **hours per year**  **(Ex0.1) (H)** 

**Cost, $ b** 

Report Review Initial notification of applicability c 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 $0 Startup, shutdown, malfunction plan/report 2 1 2 29 58 2.9 5.8 $3,005.82 Notification of compliance status c 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 $0 Semiannual excess emissions report 0.5 2 0.5 87 87 4.35 8.7 $4,508.73 **TOTAL ANNUAL BURDEN 167**  **$7,515**

**Assu mptions:** 
a There are 87 EAF steelmaking facilities. The average number of respondents per year for one

- time events over the 3

- year period of the ICR is 29

. b This ICR uses the following average hourly labor rates: $62.27 for managerial (GS

- 13, Step 5, $38.92 × 1.6), $46.21 ( GS

- 12, Step 1, $28.88 × 1.6) for technical and $25.01 (GS

- 6, Step 3, $15.63 × 1.6) for clerical. These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) “2013 General Schedule” which excludes locality rates of pay.
c After full implementation, the agency is not expected to experience any burden from these activities because existing facilities are not longer expected to submit Initial notifications of applicability or Notifications of compliance status. No new facili ties are expected to become subject to the rule over the 3

- year period.