alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 23, 2012

h0416 

# Order

April 23, 2012

144285

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 144285 COA: 306523 Mecosta CC: 10-006812-FH DAKOTA LEE MANSHADOW, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 9, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### § 806.10 Purpose of this subpart.

The purpose of this subpart is to set forth procedures governing applications required by §§ 806.4, 806.5, 806.6 and 18 CFR part 801.
AFS-12-501-E August 28, 2012

Exemption No. 10616 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-0849

Ms. Laura Fast

Parent of Samuel Fast

1820 West Odell Avenue Casper, WY 82604

Dear Ms. Fast:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and lists the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter received May 9, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Samuel Fast for an exemption from § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow Samuel to exceed the specified weight limit for an FAA-approved child restraint system (CAReS, manufactured by AmSafe Corporation) during use of that child restraint system (CRS) aboard a United States (U.S.) aircraft.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Samuel.

The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9834 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that numerous people with physical challenges had previously completed flights using2

restraint systems that addressed unique physical needs regarding safety, support, and security in the same manner of operations as described in this petition. The FAA further found that the petition, if granted, would not set any new precedents regarding the use of restraint systems by persons with disabilities.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed grant.

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed exemption also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Samuel Fast exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B). In addition, any air carrier or commercial operator operating under part 121 while Samuel is aboard its aircraft is granted an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) to the extent necessary to allow Samuel to exceed the specified weight limit for an FAA-approved CRS during use of that CRS aboard a U.S.

aircraft.

All operations under this exemption must be conducted with at least one of Samuel’s parents or a caregiver accompanying him. Samuel Fast may only occupy a passenger seat with no passenger seated behind him. In addition, Samuel’s parent or caregiver must carry a copy of this exemption and advise the air carrier about the contents of the exemption at least 48 hours before the date of each flight.

This exemption terminates on September 30, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John M. Allen Director, Flight Standards

Service

Enclosure
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Gouverneur  Bancorp Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
F. Bennett,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes -Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.


August 3, 2007                         By: /s/ Richard F. Bennett
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Richard F. Bennett
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer

     The  foregoing   certification  is  being  furnished  solely   pursuant  to
Subsections  (a) and (b) of Section 1350,  Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code in accordance with Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall
not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities  Exchange Act
of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be
deemed to be  incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act
of 1933 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                                       32
### §4606. Protection of information

#### (a) Freedom of Information Act

Section 552 of title 5 shall not apply to information obtained by the Federal Government on a confidential basis under section 4602(b)(5) of this title.

#### (b) Intellectual property

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, intellectual property, trade secrets, and technical data owned and developed by Sematech or any of the participants in Sematech may not be disclosed by any officer or employee of the Department of Defense except as provided in the provision included in the memorandum of understanding pursuant to section 4602(b)(5) of this title.

(Pub. L. 100–180, div. A, title II, §276, Dec. 4, 1987, 101 Stat. 1071.)
### §2303. Designation of written warranties

#### (a) Full (statement of duration) or limited warranty

Any warrantor warranting a consumer product by means of a written warranty shall clearly and conspicuously designate such warranty in the following manner, unless exempted from doing so by the Commission pursuant to subsection (c) of this section:

(1) If the written warranty meets the Federal minimum standards for warranty set forth in section 2304 of this title, then it shall be conspicuously designated a "full (statement of duration) warranty".

(2) If the written warranty does not meet the Federal minimum standards for warranty set forth in section 2304 of this title, then it shall be conspicuously designated a "limited warranty".

#### (b) Applicability of requirements, standards, etc., to representations or statements of customer satisfaction

This section and sections 2302 and 2304 of this title shall not apply to statements or representations which are similar to expressions of general policy concerning customer satisfaction and which are not subject to any specific limitations.

#### (c) Exemptions by Commission

In addition to exercising the authority pertaining to disclosure granted in section 2302 of this title, the Commission may by rule determine when a written warranty does not have to be designated either "full (statement of duration)" or "limited" in accordance with this section.

#### (d) Applicability to consumer products costing more than $10 and not designated as full warranties

The provisions of subsections (a) and (c) of this section apply only to warranties which pertain to consumer products actually costing the consumer more than $10 and which are not designated "full (statement of duration) warranties".

(Pub. L. 93–637, title I, §103, Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2187.)
§ 33.12 Notification requirement for certain transactions. ( a ) Any public utility that is seeking to merge or consolidate, directly or indirectly, its facilities subject to the jurisdiction of the Commission, or any part thereof, with those of any other person, shall notify the Commission of such transaction not later than 30 days after the date on which the transaction is consummated if: ( 1 ) The facilities, or any part thereof, to be acquired are of a value in excess of $1 million; and
( 2 ) Such public utility is not required to secure an order of the Commission under section 203(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Power Act.
( b ) Such notification shall consist of the following information: ( 1 ) The exact name of the public utility and its principal business address; and
( 2 ) A narrative description of the transaction, including: ( i ) The identity of all parties involved in the transaction, whether such parties are affiliates, and all jurisdictional facilities associated with or affected by the transaction;
( ii ) The location of such jurisdictional facilities involved in the transaction;
( iii ) The date on which the transaction was consummated;
( iv ) The consideration for the transaction; and
( v ) The effect of the transaction on the ownership and control of such jurisdictional facilities.
[Order 855, 84 FR 6075, Feb. 26, 2019]
(function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];var j=d.createElement(s);var dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.src='https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl+'';j.async=true;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-N898TT');
**Nitric A cid Tail Gas Effluent** 

NOX Concentration as measured by CEMS **Note:**Monthly

data is based on 24-hour daily averages.

**Year 2006**  **Year 2007**  **Year 2008**  Month Avg NOX Month Avg NOX Month Avg NOX

ppm ppm ppm January 32.71 January 38.08 January 38.87 February 28.61 February 39.80 February 10.66 March 37.30 March 35.87 March 14.56 April 31.81 April 30.63 April 9.19 May 34.94 May 50.44 May 6.01 June 27.10 June 33.65 June 7.62 July 19.30 July 39.48 July 9.04 August 25.10 August 497.87 August 8.46 September 26.94 September 30.08 September 13.64 October 23.34 October 17.95 October 5.60 November 28.17 November 16.65 November 6.55 December 32.65 December 9.67 December 11.04

**An nual A** 

**vg** 29.00 70.01 11.77
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Cambridge Heart, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended December 31,
2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Ali Haghighi-Mood, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 31, 2010



/s/ Ali Haghighi-MoodAli Haghighi-MoodPresident and Chief Executive Officer
§ 3.41 Handling. ( a ) Any person who is subject to the Animal Welfare regulations and who moves live guinea pigs or hamsters from an animal holding area of a terminal facility to a primary conveyance or vice versa shall do so as quickly and efficiently as possible. Any person subject to the Animal Welfare Act and holding any live guinea pig or hamster in an animal holding area of a terminal facility or transporting any live guinea pig or hamster to or from a terminal facility shall provide the following: ( 1 ) *Shelter from sunlight.* When sunlight is likely to cause overheating or discomfort, sufficient shade shall be provided to protect the live guinea pigs and hamsters from the direct rays of the sun and such live guinea pigs or hamsters shall not be subjected to surrounding air temperatures which exceed 29.5 °C. (85 °F.), and which shall be measured and read in the manner prescribed § 3.40 of this part, for a period of more than 45 minutes.
( 2 ) *Shelter from rain or snow.* Live guinea pigs and hamsters shall be provided protection to allow them to remain dry during rain or snow.
( 3 ) *Shelter from cold weather.* Transporting devices shall be covered to provide protection for live guinea pigs and hamsters when the outdoor air temperature falls below 10 °C. (50 °F.), and such live guinea pigs and hamsters shall not be subjected to surrounding air temperatures which fall below 7.2 °C. (45 °F.), and which shall be measured and read in the manner prescribed in § 3.40 of this part, for a period of more than 45 minutes.
( b ) Care shall be exercised to avoid handling of the primary enclosure in such a manner that may cause physical or emotional trauma to the live guinea pig or hamster contained therein.
( c ) Primary enclosures used to transport any live guinea pig or hamster shall not be tossed, dropped, or needlessly tilted and shall not be stacked in a manner which may reasonably be expected to result in their falling.
[43 FR 21163, May 16, 1978, as amended at 43 FR 56216, Dec. 1, 1978; 55 FR 28883, July 16, 1990]
### §6910. Implementation

The Administrator shall, by regulation, establish such requirements as may be necessary to carry out this chapter.

(Pub. L. 103–325, title I, §181, as added Pub. L. 106–102, title VII, §725, Nov. 12, 1999, 113 Stat. 1475.)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1351

MADELIENE Y. JEFFREYS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

NORTH CAROLINA DISABILITY DETERMINATION SERVICE; JUDY GARDNER, in her capacity as DDS 22

108,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,

Chief District Judge. (CA-96-656-6)

Submitted: July 10, 1997 Decided: July 22, 1997

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Madeliene Y. Jeffreys, Appellant Pro Se. Belinda Anne Smith, NORTH

CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing her

civil action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. Jeffreys v. North Carolina Disability Determination Serv., No. CA-96-656-6 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 10, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
PPR-07-2010 11:32 FPP RENTON P.02/03 

O 

U.S. Departmerrf 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

Transport Airplane Directorate 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, Wasliington 98067-3356 

April 6,2010 

Mr. C.Nham 

Senior Project Manager 

Fixed Wing Large Transport Aircraft 

National Aircraft Certification, Civil Aviation 

Transport Canada 

Aircraft Certification Branch (AARDE) 

3"* Floor, Tower C, Place De Ville 

300 Sparks Street 

Ottawa, Ontario 

Canada 

Kl A 0N8 

Dear Mr. Nham 

We have received your February 25, 2010, correspondence transmitting a report on behalf of 

Bombardier Aerospace in support of their petition for exemption from Title 14 Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 25.981(a)(3) for their CL-600-2E25, CRJ-1000 airplane. 

Your request, which we submitted to the Department of Transportation's Federal Document 

Management System, on your behalf (Docket No. FAA 2010-0287) will be processed by 

this office when you provide all necessary information. Please refer to 14 CFR 11.81 for 

instructions about what information you must include in your petitions for exemption for us 

to process your request. Take particular note of items listed below, as these items were 

missing from your original request 

• The extent of relief you seek and the reasons for seeking the relief 

• The reasons why granting your request would be in the public interest; that 

is, how it would benefit the public as a whole. 

• The reason why granting the exemption would not adversely affect safety, or 

how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that 

provided by the rule from which you seek exemption. 

• A summary we can publish in the Federal Register stating: The rule from 

which you seek the exemption and a brief description of the nature of the 

exemption you seek. 
PlPR-07-2010 11:32 FflP RENTON P. 03/03 

2 

You may also want to include the following: 

• Any additional mformation, views, or arguments to support your request, 

and 

• If you want to exercise the privileges of your exemption outside the 

United States, the reason you need to do so. 

Section 11.85 requires us to publish a summary of your petitions for exemption in the 

Federal Register for public comment. Section 11.87 allows you to present reasons, or the 

FAA to find good cause, why we should not delay action on your petitions by the public 

comment process. 

Also note that § 11,63 requires you to send petitions for exemption at least 120 days before 

you need the exemption to take effect. 

We will hold the docket open for 30 days awaiting this information. If we do not receive a 

response in 30 days we will close the docket with no further correspondence to you. 

Should you have any questions or concerns regarding your petition or the petition process, 

please contact Michael Collins, 425-227-2689, Michael.Collins@faa.gov. 

Sincerely, 

^ctor Wicklund 

Manager, Propulsion/Mechanical Systems Branch, ANM-112 

Transport Standards Staff 

Transport Airplane Directorate 

Aircraft Certification Service 

TOTRL P.03
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Granite Cliffs Incorporated,
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2001 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"),  the undersigned,  B.
Stephen Bailey,  Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my  knowledge  and
belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health TRAPED

MENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES . USA

A NEW TRAINING VIDEO for AGGREGATE OPERATORS

“AGGREGATE TRAINING FOR THE SAFETY IMPAIRED”

 Objective

To develop safety training tools for mine safety and health

trainers that can be used for both new-miner training and

annual refresher training.

Background

For the past 3 years, NIOSH has been developing training

materials for mine safety trainers in response to gaps identified

during stakeholder meetings. Most materials have been

directed to the hazards of underground mines, but the recent

passage of Part 46 of CFR 30 required new-miner and annual

refresher training in aggregate operations. One result was the

identification of another audience needing basic information

about safety in mining. Trainers characterized trainees in this

segment of the industry primarily as young males, many of

whom had little work experience.

Approach 

Training specialists from the Arizona State Mine

Inspector’s Office approached NIOSH researchers early in

2002 about the possibility of a collaborative project

to develop safety training materials for new trainees in

aggregate operations. A preliminary search of MSHA accident

statistics identified over a dozen common hazards that could

be targeted in a training video. A storyline was developed for

review by safety specialists in the aggregate industry, and a

script was written to cover the selected

hazards. Although the target audience was primarily new

hires, the finished video was also to be relevant to more

experienced workers. 

Aggregate Training for the Safety Impaired

The video follows two new hires through their first week on

the job. Ted and Slick have not paid attention in training class

and prove to be hazards to themselves as well as everyone

around them. In the course of the week, they are fired from

four different mines and learn the hard way what can happen

if the dangers of surface mining are ignored. Slick (a crash

test dummy in real life) has several very close calls before the

boys realize that safety is no laughing matter. The video is 34

minutes long and uses humor to present 15 different hazards,

as well as safety tips on how to avoid these hazards.

For More Information

Elaine Cullen, Spokane Research Laboratory, E. 315

Montgomery, Spokane, WA 99207 (509) 354-8057 or e-mail

efc8@cdc.gov.

To receive additional information about occupational safety

and health problems, call 1-800-35-NIOSH (1-800-356-4674),

or visit the NIOSH Web site at www.cdc.gov/niosh

Mention of any company name or product does not constitute

endorsement by the National Institute for Occupational Safety

and Health.

Technology News

Milestones in Mining Safety and Health Technology

SAFER HEALTHIER PEOPLE

No. 502 January 2003
Ted and Slick are lectured about safety practices

at an aggregate operation.

The safety chorus that watches over the

trials of Slick and Ted.

Ignoring the safety rules results in an

accident.