alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of  Neighborhood  Investment,
Ltd.,  on Form  10-QSB for the  period  ending  June 30,  2002 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "REPORT"),  the
undersigned, B. Stephen Bailey, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 358.5 Independent functioning rule. ( a ) *General rule.* Except as permitted in this part or otherwise permitted by Commission order, a transmission provider's transmission function employees must function independently of its marketing function employees.
( b ) *Separation of functions.* ( 1 ) A transmission provider is prohibited from permitting its marketing function employees to: ( i ) Conduct transmission functions; or
( ii ) Have access to the system control center or similar facilities used for transmission operations that differs in any way from the access available to other transmission customers.
( 2 ) A transmission provider is prohibited from permitting its transmission function employees to conduct marketing functions.
### §1293. Intercollegiate and interscholastic football contest limitations

The first sentence of section 1291 of this title shall not apply to any joint agreement described in such section which permits the telecasting of all or a substantial part of any professional football game on any Friday after six o'clock postmeridian or on any Saturday during the period beginning on the second Friday in September and ending on the second Saturday in December in any year from any telecasting station located within seventy-five miles of the game site of any intercollegiate or interscholastic football contest scheduled to be played on such a date if—

(1) such intercollegiate football contest is between institutions of higher learning both of which confer degrees upon students following completion of sufficient credit hours to equal a four-year course, or

(2) in the case of an interscholastic football contest, such contest is between secondary schools, both of which are accredited or certified under the laws of the State or States in which they are situated and offer courses continuing through the twelfth grade of the standard school curriculum, or the equivalent, and

(3) such intercollegiate or interscholastic football contest and such game site were announced through publication in a newspaper of general circulation prior to August 1 of such year as being regularly scheduled for such day and place.

(Pub. L. 87–331, §3, Sept. 30, 1961, 75 Stat. 732; Pub. L. 89–800, §6(b)(3), Nov. 8, 1966, 80 Stat. 1515.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1966—Pub. L. 89–800 substituted "The first sentence of section 1291 of this title" for "Section 1291 of this title" at beginning of section, extended limitation granted for football contests on game sites located within 75 miles of telecasting stations to include interscholastic contests, redesignated cl. (2) as (3), added a new cl. (2), and, in cl. (3) as so redesignated, substituted "newspaper of general circulation prior to August 1" for "daily newspaper of general circulation prior to March 1" as description of the type newspaper required for the announcement of the game site of intercollegiate or interscholastic football games.
# C_2011173EN.01000702.xml

| 11.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 173/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 173/7

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Oviedo (Spain) lodged on 5 April 2011 — Angel Lorenzo González Alonso v Nationale Nederlanden Vida Cia De Seguros y Reaseguros S.A.E

(Case C-166/11)

2011/C 173/14

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Audiencia Provincial de Oviedo

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Angel Lorenzo González Alonso

Applicant:

Defendant: Nationale Nederlanden Vida Cia De Seguros y Reaseguros S.A.E.

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Must Article 3(2)(d) of Council Directive 85/577/EEC (1) of 20 December 1985 to protect the consumer in respect of contracts negotiated away from business premises be interpreted restrictively so as not to cover a contract, concluded away from business premises, under which life assurance is offered in return for payment of a monthly premium to be invested, in varying proportions, in fixed-rate investments, variable-rate investments and financial investment products of the company itself?

1

---

(1)  OJ 1985 L 372, p. 31.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Caprock Canyon  Investments,
Inc.,  on Form 10- QSB for the  period  ending  June 30,  2004 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "REPORT"),  the
undersigned, B. Stephen Bailey, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: September 4, 2004

/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 33 (Wednesday, February 19, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 9576]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-03521]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8635]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Alibis: Sigmar Polke 1963-2010''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Alibis: Sigmar Polke 1963-2010,'' imported 
from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of 
cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Museum of 
Modern Art, New York, New York, from on or about April 19, 2014, until 
on or about August 3, 2014, and at possible additional exhibitions or 
venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have 
ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: February 6, 2014.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-03521 Filed 2-18-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender.

STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Seeks Applications for Community Facilities Technical Assistance 

and Training Grants

WASHINGTON, Jan. 11, 2021 – United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Deputy Under Secretary

for Rural Development Bette Brand today invited applications for grants to help rural communities expand their 

capacity to access financial resources and build prosperity. 

USDA plans to make the grants available under the Community Facilities Technical Assistance and Training 

Grant Program, subject to the availability of funding. Through this program, rural communities with limited 

staff and resources can build the capacity needed to access USDA funding to support essential community 

facilities.

Funds may be used to help rural communities identify financial resources, improve the management of 

community facilities, and prepare reports, surveys and applications. Eligible recipients are public entities, 

private nonprofit organizations and federally recognized tribes.

USDA encourages applications that will support recommendations made in the Report to the President of the 

United States from the Task Force on Agriculture and Rural Prosperity (PDF, 5.4 MB) to help improve life in 

rural America. 

Applicants are encouraged to consider projects that provide measurable results in helping rural communities 

build robust and sustainable economies through strategic investments. Key strategies include:

• Achieving e-Connectivity for Rural America

• Developing the Rural Economy

• Harnessing Technological Innovation

• Supporting a Rural Workforce

• Improving Quality of Life 

Paper applications must be postmarked and mailed, shipped or sent overnight by 4:00 p.m. local time on March 

29, 2021. Electronic applications must be submitted via grants.gov by midnight Eastern time on March 22, 

2021.

For additional information, see page 1920 of the Jan. 11, 2021, Federal Register.

If you’d like to subscribe to USDA Rural Development updates, visit our GovDelivery subscriber page. 

###
EXHIBIT 99.1
                              C.E.O. CERTIFICATION




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  Crescent  Moon,  Inc.  (Formerly
Cherokee  Investments,  Inc.) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending  November 30,
2002, as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof
(the  "Report"),  I, Robert  Denome,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.




/s/ Robert Denome
Chief Executive Officer
December 30, 2002



<PAGE>
#### § 1312.22 Issuance of citations for petty offenses.

Any person who violates any provision contained in 16 U.S.C. 470ee or 16 U.S.C. 433 in the presence of a TVA law enforcement agent may be tried and sentenced in accordance with the provisions of section 3401 of Title 18, United States Code. Law enforcement agents designated by the Director for that purpose shall have the authority to issue a petty offense citation for any such violation, requiring any person charged with the violation to appear before a United States Magistrate Judge within whose jurisdiction the archaeological resource impacted by the violation is located. The term “petty offense” has the same meaning given that term under section 19 of Title 18, United States Code.

[81 FR 54499, Aug. 16, 2016]
# C_2010288EN.01006101.xml

| 23.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/61

---

Action brought on 3 September 2010 — Rubinetteria Cisal v Commission

(Case T-368/10)

()

(2010/C 288/110)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Rubinetteria Cisal (Alzo Frazione di Pella, Italy) (represented by M. Pinnarò, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

| — | Annulment of Decision C(2010) 4185 of 23 June 2010; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annulment of Decision C(2010) 4185 of 23 June 2010;

| — | alternatively, if the Court should not annul the fine imposed, reduction of the fine to a more appropriate sum; |
| --- | --- |

—

alternatively, if the Court should not annul the fine imposed, reduction of the fine to a more appropriate sum;

| — | an order that the Commission should pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

an order that the Commission should pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The decision contested in these proceedings is the same as that in Case T-364/10 Duravit and Others v Commission.

In support of its claims the applicant puts forward the following pleas in law:

I.   Infringement and misapplication of Articles 101 TFEU and 53 EEA

In this regard, it is claimed that the decision, in so far as it concerns Cisal, is quite wrong, for Cisal has played no part (even an unwitting part) in any cartel, having merely exchanged non-sensitive business information which was unreserved and (in almost every case) later than the decisions taken independently and already spreading on the market.

II.   Breach of the principles of proportionality and equal treatment

According to the applicant, the Commission failed to consider that the role, involvement, responsibility, advantages etc. of and for each producer differed significantly from one to another. Specifically, the defendant has drawn no distinctions and does not explain why the maximum penalty is to be imposed on Cisal, given that the latter: (i) was never a member of one of the two associations (Michelangelo); (ii) never had bilateral contacts; (iii) did not take part in meetings at which all three products were considered (but only taps, cocks and fittings and ceramic ware) and (iv) had always had only an insignificant share of the market.

So far as the fixing of the fine is concerned, the applicant maintains that the Commission ought to have taken into account and determined the actual effect of the infringement on the market and the extent of the relevant geographic market, and to have taken account of Cisal’s actual economic ability to distort competition and of its specific weight.

The applicant alleges also that the basis used for computing the amount of the fine was incorrect, and that the Commission failed to have regard to mitigating circumstances.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 632 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 632

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the inclusion of 
certain fringe benefit expenses for which a deduction is disallowed in 
                   unrelated business taxable income.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 28, 2019

Mr. Lankford (for himself and Mr. Coons) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the inclusion of 
certain fringe benefit expenses for which a deduction is disallowed in 
                   unrelated business taxable income.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Lessen Impediments From Taxes for 
Charities Act'' or the ``LIFT for Charities Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF INCLUSION OF CERTAIN FRINGE BENEFIT EXPENSES IN 
              UNRELATED BUSINESS TAXABLE INCOME.

    (a) In General.--Section 512(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by striking paragraph (7).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall take 
effect as if included in the amendments made by section 13703 of Public 
Law 115-97.
                                 <all>
```
Do You Know About Marijuana?

 Talk With Your Kids About the Facts.

Marijuana: Did You Know? Talk With Your Kids About 

the Facts.

Marijuana use may have a wide range 

of effects, both physical and mental.

Marijuana can cause cognitive and 

physical issues such as breathing 

problems; increased heart rate; poor 

judgment and decision making; and 

difficulty with attention, concentration, 

coordination, problem solving, 

learning, and memory.1,2

Young kids are using marijuana.

Approximately 1.2 million kids ages 12 

to 17 used marijuana for the first time 

in the past year. That is about 3,300 

kids a day.3

Marijuana can be addictive.

Nearly one in three people who use 

marijuana may have some degree of 

marijuana use disorder.4

 Nearly one 

in 10 people who try marijuana also 

become addicted to it.5

Nearly one in three people who use 

marijuana may have some degree of 

marijuana use disorder. Teens have a higher risk than adults of 6

becoming addicted to marijuana. One in six 

people who start using marijuana as 

teenagers will become addicted.7

1

 Crane N. A., Schuster R. M., Mermelstein R. J., Gonzalez R. (2015). Neuropsychological sex differences associated with age of initiated use among young adult Cannabis users. J. Clin. 

Exp. Neuropsychol.

2

 Meier, M. H., Caspi, A., Ambler, A., Harrington, H., Houts, R., Keefe, R. S. E., McDonald, K., Ward, A., Poulton, R., & Moffitt, T. E. (2012). Persistent cannabis users show 

neuropsychological decline from childhood to midlife. PNAS, 109(40): E2657–E2664. 3

 Crane, N. A., Schuster R. M., Mermelstein R. J., Gonzalez R. (2015). Neuropsychological sex differences associated with age of initiated use among young adult Cannabis users. J. Clin. 

Exp. Neuropsychol.

4

 Hasin, D. S., Saha, T. D., Kerridge, B. T., et al. (2015). Prevalence of Marijuana Use Disorders in the United States Between 2001–2002 and 2012–2013. JAMA Psychiatry, 72(12):1,235–

1,242. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.1858.

5

 Crane, N. A., Schuster, R. M., Mermelstein, R. J., Gonzalez R. (2015). Neuropsychological sex differences associated with age of initiated use among young adult Cannabis users. J. Clin. 

Exp. Neuropsychol. 6

 Hasin, D. S., Saha, T. D., Kerridge, B. T., et al. (2015). Prevalence of Marijuana Use Disorders in the United States Between 2001–2002 and 2012–2013. JAMA Psychiatry, 72(12):1,235–

1,242. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.1858.

7

 Hall W, Degenhardt L. Adverse health effects of non-medical cannabis use. Lancet 2009;374:1383-91. 

Start talking with your kids about the facts. For tips on how—and when—to begin 

the conversation, visit www.underagedrinking.samhsa.gov.

SMA-18-5077
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Yavapai County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet in Prescott, Arizona. The committee is meeting as authorized under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act (Pub. L. 110-343) and in compliance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act. The purpose of the meeting is to orientate new committee members to the Secural Rural Schools Act, roles of members, guidelines for Title II, and the Federal Advisory Committee Act.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held March 25, 2011; 10:30 a.m to 2:30 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Yavapai County Mackin Building, 840 Rodeo Drive, Prescott, AZ 86305.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Debbie Maneely, RAC Coordinator, Prescott National Forest, 344 S. Cortez, Prescott, AZ 86301; (928) 443-8130 or                         *dmaneely@fs.fed.us.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting is open to the public. The following business will be conducted: (1) Welcome and introductions; (2) Project Presentations/Questions-Answers; (3) review and ranking of projects submitted for Round 1; (4) next meeting agenda, location, and date.

Dated: March 4, 2011.

Nancy Walls,

Acting Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 2011-5462 Filed 3-9-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-P