### 16675 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 60 / Monday, March 30, 2015 / Notices

discussions on revising the second draft of the working group’s recommendations to the NDWAC on potential changes to the Lead and Copper Rule.

**DATES :**  The meeting on April 23, 2015, will be held from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., eastern time, and on April 24, 2015, from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m., eastern time.

**ADDRESSES :**  The meeting will be held at the Cadmus Group Inc., 1555 Wilson Blvd., Suite 300, Arlington, VA, and will be open to the public. All attendees must sign in with the security desk and show photo identification to enter the building.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  For more information about this meeting or to request written materials contact Lameka Smith, Standards and Risk Management Division, Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water, EPA; by phone at (202) 564–1629 or by email at LCRWorkingGroup@epa.gov. For additional information about the Lead and Copper Rule, please visit: http:// water.epa.gov/lawsregs/rulesregs/sdwa/ lcr/index.cfm.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 

Details about Participating in the Meeting: Members of the public who would like to register for this meeting should contact Lameka Smith by April 22, 2015, by email at LCRWorkingGroup@epa.gov or by phone at 202–564–1629. The LCRWG will allocate 15 minutes for the public’s input at the meeting on April 23rd and 15 minutes on April 24th. Each oral statement will be limited to five minutes at the meeting. It is preferred that only one person present a statement on behalf of a group or organization. To ensure adequate time for public involvement, individuals or organizations interested in presenting an oral statement should notify Lameka Smith no later than April 21, 2015. Any person who wishes to file a written statement can do so before or after the LCRWG meeting. Written statements intended for the meeting must be received by April 20, 2015, to be distributed to all members of the working group before the meeting. Any statements received on or after the date specified will become part of the permanent file for the meeting and will be forwarded to the LCRWG members for their information.

Special Accommodations: For information on access or to request special accommodations for individuals with disabilities please contact Lameka Smith at (202) 564–1629 or by email at LCRWorkingGroup@epa.gov at least 10 days prior to the meeting to give the EPA as much time as possible to process your request.

Dated: March 19, 2015. Peter Grevatt, Director, Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water.
[FR Doc. 2015–07112 Filed 3–27–15; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**[EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0057; FRL–9922–79]**

**Registration Review; Pesticide Dockets Opened for Review and**  **Comment**

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Notice.

**SUMMARY :**  With this document, EPA is opening the public comment period for several registration reviews. Registration review is EPA’s periodic review of pesticide registrations to ensure that each pesticide continues to satisfy the statutory standard for registration, that is, the pesticide can perform its intended function without unreasonable adverse effects on human health or the environment. Registration review dockets contain information that will assist the public in understanding the types of information and issues that the Agency may consider during the course of registration reviews. Through this program, EPA is ensuring that each pesticide’s registration is based on current scientific and other knowledge, including its effects on human health and the environment. This document also announces the Agency’s intent to close the registration review case for tebufenpyrad, imazamethabenz, and 2- ((hydroxymethyl)-amino)ethanol (also known as HMAE). These pesticides do not currently have any actively registered pesticide products and, therefore, the Agency is closing the registration review cases for tebufenpyrad, imazamethabenz, and HMAE.

For phenmedipham, EPA is seeking comment on the preliminary work plan, the ecological problem formulation, and the human health draft risk assessment.

**DATES :**  Comments must be received on or before May 29, 2015.

**ADDRESSES :**  Submit your comments identified by the docket identification (ID) number for the specific pesticide of interest provided in the table in Unit III.A., by one of the following methods:

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/ DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001.

• Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the instructions at http:// www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.

Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along with more information about dockets generally, is available at http:// www.epa.gov/dockets.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  For pesticide specific information,

contact: The Chemical Review Manager for the pesticide of interest identified in the table in Unit III.A. For general information contact:

Richard Dumas, Pesticide ReEvaluation Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460– 0001; telephone number: (703) 308– 8015; fax number: (703) 308–8005; email address: dumas.richard@
epa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 
I. General Information A. Does this action apply to me?

This action is directed to the public in general, and may be of interest to a wide range of stakeholders including environmental, human health, farmworker, and agricultural advocates; the chemical industry; pesticide users; and members of the public interested in the sale, distribution, or use of pesticides. Since others also may be interested, the Agency has not attempted to describe all the specific entities that may be affected by this action. B. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?

1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or CD–ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD–ROM the specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as CBI, a


### 16676 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 60 / Monday, March 30, 2015 / Notices

copy of the comment that does not contain the information claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket. Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.

2. Tips for preparing your comments. When preparing and submitting your comments, see the commenting tips at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/ comments.html.

3. Environmental justice. EPA seeks to achieve environmental justice, the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of any group, including minority and/or low income populations, in the development, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies. To help address potential environmental justice issues, the Agency seeks information on any groups or segments of the population who, as a result of their location, cultural practices, or other factors, may have atypical or disproportionately high and adverse human health impacts or environmental effects from exposure to the pesticides discussed in this document, compared to the general population. II. Authority

EPA is initiating its reviews of the pesticides identified in this document pursuant to section 3(g) of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) (7 U.S.C. 136a(g)) and the Procedural Regulations for Registration Review at 40 CFR part 155, subpart C. Section 3(g) of FIFRA provides, among other things, that the registrations of pesticides are to be reviewed every 15 years. Under FIFRA, a pesticide product may be registered or remain registered only if it meets the statutory standard for registration given in FIFRA section 3(c)(5) (7 U.S.C. 136a(c)(5)). When used in accordance with widespread and commonly recognized practice, the pesticide product must perform its intended function without unreasonable adverse effects on the environment; that is, without any unreasonable risk to man or the environment, or a human dietary risk from residues that result from the use of a pesticide in or on food.
III. Registration Reviews
A. What action is the Agency taking?

As directed by FIFRA section 3(g), EPA is reviewing the pesticide registrations identified in the table in this unit to assure that they continue to satisfy the FIFRA standard for registration—that is, they can still be used without unreasonable adverse effects on human health or the environment. A pesticide’s registration review begins when the Agency establishes a docket for the pesticide’s registration review case and opens the docket for public review and comment. At present, EPA is opening registration review dockets for the cases identified in the following table.



### TABLE 

### 1—R EGISTRATION 

### R EVIEW 

### DOCKETS 

### O PENING

Registration review case name and No. Pesticide docket ID No. Chemical review manager, telephone number, email address

Bioban P-1487 (Case 3028) ........................... EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0802 SanYvette Williams, 703–305–7702, williams.sanyvette@epa.gov

. Bis(bromoacetoxy)-2-butene (BBAB) (Case

3030). EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0799 Tina Pham, 703–308–0125, pham.thao@epa.gov

. Carboxin and Oxycarboxin (Case 0012) ........ EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0144 Dana L. Friedman, 703–347–8827, friedman.dana@epa.gov

. Copper HDO (Case 5106) .............................. EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0800 Donna Kamarei, 703–347–0443, kamarei.donna@epa.gov

. Chondrostereum Purpureum (Case 6091) ..... EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0051 Kathleen Martin, 703–308–2857, kathleen.martin@epa.gov

. Creosote (Case 0139) .................................... EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0823 Sandra O’Neill, 703–347–0141, oneill.sandra@epa.gov

. Cyazofamid (Case 7656) ................................ EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0128 Jose Gayoso, 703–347–8652, gayoso.jose@epa.gov

. Famoxadone (Case 7038) .............................. EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0094 Christina Scheltema, 703–308–2201, scheltema.christina@
epa.gov

. Lufenuron (Case 7627) ................................... EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0098 Bonnie Adler, 703–308–8523, adler.bonnie@epa.gov

. Myclobutanil (Case 7006) ............................... EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0053 Benjamin Askin, 703–347–0503, askin.benjamin@epa.gov

. Novaluron (Case 7615) ................................... EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0171 Margaret Hathaway, 703–305–5076, hathaway.margaret@
epa.gov

. Phenmedipham (Case 0277) .......................... EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0546 Miguel Zavala, 703–347–0504, zavala.miguel@epa.gov

. Sethoxydim (Case 2600) ................................ EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0088 James Parker, 703–306–0469, parker.james@epa.gov

. Spirodiclofen (Case 7443) .............................. EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0262 Julia Stokes, 703–347–8966, stokes.julia@epa.gov

. Spiromesifen (Case 7442) .............................. EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0263 Julia Stokes, 703–347–8966, stokes.julia@epa.gov

.

For phenmedipham (Case 0277) EPA is seeking comment on the preliminary Work Plan, the ecological problem formulation, and the human health draft risk. For Forchlorfenuron (Case 7057), EPA is seeking comment on the Combined Work Plan, Summary Document, and Proposed Interim Registration Review Decision, which includes the human health and ecological risk assessments. The Agency also is announcing the intent to close the registration review cases for tebufenpyrad, imazamethabenz, and 2- (hydroxymethyl)- amino)ethanol also known as HMAE. These pesticides do not currently have any actively registered pesticide products and, therefore, the Agency is closing the registration review cases for tebufenpyrad, imazamethabenz, and HMAE. The tebufenpyrad registration review case is being closed because the last products were canceled in the Federal Register notice dated September 24, 2014 (79 FR 57087) (FRL–9916–69). The ‘‘Notice of Registration Review Case Closure’’ for tebufenpyrad is available in docket EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0218 at http:// www.regulations.gov. For phenmedipham (Case 0277), EPA is seeking comment on the preliminary work plan, the ecological problem formulation, and the human health draft risk assessment. The imazamethabenz registration review case is being closed because the last products were canceled in the Federal Register. The ‘‘Notice of Registration Review Case Closure’’ for imazamethabenz is available in docket EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0394 at http:// www.regulations.gov.

B. Docket Content

1. Review dockets. The registration review dockets contain information that the Agency may consider in the course of the registration review. The Agency may include information from its files including, but not limited to, the following information:

• An overview of the registration review case status.

• A list of current product registrations and registrants.

• Federal Register notices regarding any pending registration actions.


### 16677 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 60 / Monday, March 30, 2015 / Notices

• Federal Register notices regarding current or pending tolerances.

• Risk assessments.

• Bibliographies concerning current registrations.

• Summaries of incident data.

• Any other pertinent data or information.

Each docket contains a document summarizing what the Agency currently knows about the pesticide case and a preliminary work plan for anticipated data and assessment needs. Additional documents provide more detailed information. During this public comment period, the Agency is asking that interested persons identify any additional information they believe the Agency should consider during the registration reviews of these pesticides. The Agency identifies in each docket the areas where public comment is specifically requested, though comment in any area is welcome.

2. Other related information. More information on these cases, including the active ingredients for each case, may be located in the registration review schedule on the Agency’s Web site athttp://www2.epa.gov/pesticidereevaluation. Information on the Agency’s registration review program and its implementing regulation may be
seen at http://www2.epa.gov/pesticidereevaluation/registration-reviewschedules.

3. Information submission requirements. Anyone may submit data or information in response to this document. To be considered during a pesticide’s registration review, the submitted data or information must meet the following requirements:

• To ensure that EPA will consider data or information submitted, interested persons must submit the data or information during the comment period. The Agency may, at its discretion, consider data or information submitted at a later date.

• The data or information submitted must be presented in a legible and useable form. For example, an English translation must accompany any material that is not in English and a written transcript must accompany any information submitted as an audiographic or videographic record. Written material may be submitted in paper or electronic form.

• Submitters must clearly identify the source of any submitted data or information.

• Submitters may request the Agency to reconsider data or information that the Agency rejected in a previous review. However, submitters must explain why they believe the Agency should reconsider the data or information in the pesticide’s registration review.

As provided in 40 CFR 155.58, the registration review docket for each pesticide case will remain publicly accessible through the duration of the registration review process; that is, until all actions required in the final decision on the registration review case have been completed.

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.
Dated: March 18, 2015. Richard P. Keigwin, Jr., Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2015–07200 Filed 3–27–15; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION** 

**[3060–0207]**

**Information Collection Being Submitted for Review and Approval to**  **the Office of Management and Budget**

**AGENCY :**  Federal Communications Commission.

**ACTION :**  Notice and request for
comments.

**SUMMARY :**  As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, and as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501– 3520), the Federal Communications Commission (FCC or the Commission) invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the following information collection. Comments are requested concerning: Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the information shall have practical utility; the accuracy of the Commission’s burden estimate; ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology; and ways to further reduce the information collection burden on small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees. The FCC may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid control number. No person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information subject to the PRA that does not display a valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number.

**DATES :**  Written PRA comments should be submitted on or before April 29, 2015. If you anticipate that you will be submitting comments, but find it difficult to do so within the period of time allowed by this notice, you should advise the contact listed below as soon as possible.

**ADDRESSES :**  Submit your PRA comments to Nicholas A. Fraser, Office of Management and Budget, via fax at 202– 395–5167 or via Internet at Nicholas

_ A.

_Fraser@omb.eop.gov and to Benish Shah, Federal Communications Commission, via the Internet at Benish.Shah@fcc.gov. To submit your PRA comments by email send them to: PRA@fcc.gov.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Benish Shah, Office of Managing Director, (202) 418–7866.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 

OMB Control Number: 3060–0207. Title: Part 11—Emergency Alert System (EAS).

Form Number: Not applicable. Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.

Respondents: Businesses or other forprofit; not-for-profit institutions; and state, local or tribal governments.

Number of Respondents and Responses: 3,569,028 respondents; 3,569,028 responses.

Estimated Time per Response: .0229776 hours.

Frequency of Response: On occasion reporting requirement and recordkeeping requirement.

Obligation to Respond: Voluntary response for business or other for-profit and not-for-respondents. Mandatory response for state, local or tribal governments. Statutory authority for this information collection is contained in 47 U.S.C. sections 154(i) and 606 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.

Total Annual Burden: 82,008 hours. Total Annual Cost: N/A. Privacy Act Impact Assessment: N/A. Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: There is no need for confidentiality.

Needs and Uses: The Commission seeking an extension of this information collection in order to obtain the full three year approval from OMB. There are no changes in any of the reporting and/or recordkeeping requirements. There is no change to the Commission’s previous burden estimated.

The Commission established a voluntary electronic method of complying with the reporting that EAS participants must complete as part of the national EAS test. This electronic