alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §70j. Exemptions

(a) None of the provisions of this subchapter shall be construed to apply to—

(1) upholstery stuffing, except as provided in section 70b(h) of this title;

(2) outer coverings of furniture, mattresses, and box springs;

(3) linings or interlinings incorporated primarily for structural purposes and not for warmth;

(4) filling or padding incorporated primarily for structural purposes and not for warmth;

(5) stiffenings, trimmings, facings, or interfacings;

(6) backings of, and paddings or cushions to be used under, floor coverings;

(7) sewing and handicraft threads;

(8) bandages, surgical dressings, and other textile fiber products, the labeling of which is subject to the requirements of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act of 1938, as amended [21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.];

(9) waste materials not intended for use in a textile fiber product;

(10) textile fiber products incorporated in shoes or overshoes or similar outer footwear;

(11) textile fiber products incorporated in headwear, handbags, luggage, brushes, lampshades, or toys, catamenial devices, adhesive tapes and adhesive sheets, cleaning cloths impregnated with chemicals, or diapers.

The exemption provided for any article by paragraph (3) or (4) of this subsection shall not be applicable if any representation as to fiber content of such article is made in any advertisement, label, or other means of identification covered by section 70b of this title.

(b) The Commission may exclude from the provisions of this subchapter other textile fiber products (1) which have an insignificant or inconsequential textile fiber content, or (2) with respect to which the disclosure of textile fiber content is not necessary for the protection of the ultimate consumer.

(Pub. L. 85–897, §12, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1723.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act of 1938, referred to in subsec. (a)(8), is act June 25, 1938, ch. 675, 52 Stat. 1040, which is classified generally to chapter 9 (§301 et seq.) of Title 21, Food and Drugs. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 301 of Title 21 and Tables.
§ 4.3 Report on project cost. ( a ) *Scheduling an audit.* When the original cost declaration letter, filed in accordance with § 4.1 is received by the Commission, its representative will schedule and conduct an audit of the books, cost records, engineering reports, and other records supporting the project's original cost. The audit may include an inspection of the project works.
( b ) *Project records.* The cost records shall be supported by memorandum accounts reflecting the indirect and overhead costs prior to their spread to primary accounts as well as all the details of allocations including formulas utilized to spread the indirect and overhead costs to primary accounts.
( c ) *Report by Commission staff.* Upon completion of the audit, a report will be prepared for the Commission setting forth the audit findings and recommendations with respect to the cost as claimed.
[Order 53, 44 FR 61948, Oct. 29, 1979]
§ 153.6 Time of filing. ( a ) An application filed pursuant to § 153.5(a) shall state whether DOE/FE authorization for the import/export of natural gas is required and whether DOE/FE has granted all required authorizations for the import/export of natural gas.
( b ) If all required DOE/FE authorizations have not been obtained prior to filing an application with the Commission, the applicant agrees, as a condition of its authorization, to file a statement that all required DOE/FE authorizations have been obtained prior to applicant's construction of border facilities.
( c ) When a prospective applicant for authorization for LNG terminal facilities, related jurisdictional natural gas facilities or modifications to existing LNG terminal facilities is required by § 157.21(a) to comply with that section's pre-filing procedures, no application for such authorization may be made before 180 days after the date of issuance of the notice by the Director of the Office of Energy Projects, as provided in § 157.21(e), of the commencement of the prospective applicant's pre-filing process under § 157.21.
[Order 595, 62 FR 30446, June 4, 1997, as amended by Order 665, 70 FR 60440, Oct. 18, 2005]
### §5305. Review

#### (a) Evaluation of research activities

The Secretary shall regularly monitor and evaluate the research activities of the applicants selected. After considering the reports of the Board provided for in section 5306(b)(2) of this title, the Secretary shall determine whether each applicant selected has complied with the management plan submitted in the original proposal and any modifications made since.

#### (b) Annual report

Each selected applicant in the program shall provide an annual report to the Secretary that explains the progress made, compliance with the management plan, whether changes are needed and are being made to the management plan, and what new research is planned.

#### (c) Discontinuation of funding

In the event a selected applicant has substantially failed in the implementation of the management plan and research activities, the Secretary shall discontinue funding.

#### (d) Solicitation of new proposals

Upon completion or discontinuance of any research activity authorized in section 5304 of this title, the Secretary shall, using available funds appropriated pursuant to this chapter, solicit new research proposals as set forth under the terms of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 101–425, §6, Oct. 15, 1990, 104 Stat. 918.)
EXHIBIT 99.2
                              C.F.O. CERTIFICATION




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  Crescent  Moon,  Inc.  (Formerly
Cherokee  Investments,  Inc.) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending  November 30,
2002, as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof
(the  "Report"),  I,  Robert  Denome,  Chief  Executive  Officer  (acting  Chief
Financial Officer) of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.




/s/ Robert Denome
Chief Executive Officer
(Acting Chief Financial Officer)
December 30, 2002



<PAGE>
# C_2011347EN.01003202.xml

| 26.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 347/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 347/32

---

Order of the General Court of 11 October 2011 — DBV v Commission

(Case T-297/10) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Dumping - Imports of certain aluminium wheels originating in China - Rights of defence - Calculation of normal value - Proportionality - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

2011/C 347/54

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: DBV Deutscher Brennstoffvertrieb Würzburg GmbH (Würzburg, Germany) (represented by: C. Rudolph and A. Günther, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: H. van Vliet and T. Maxian Rusche, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Regulation (EU) No 404/2010 of 10 May 2010 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of certain aluminium wheels originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ 2010 L 117, p. 64).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | DBV Deutscher Brennstoffvertrieb Würzburg GmbH is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

DBV Deutscher Brennstoffvertrieb Würzburg GmbH is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 246, 11.9.2010.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 664 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 664

 To amend the National Labor Relations Act to clarify the requirements 
  for meeting the definition of the term ``employee'', and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 5, 2019

 Mr. Brown (for himself, Mr. Booker, Mrs. Gillibrand, Ms. Smith, Mrs. 
    Murray, Mr. Merkley, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. Sanders, and Mr. Durbin) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
          Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the National Labor Relations Act to clarify the requirements 
  for meeting the definition of the term ``employee'', and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Workers' Freedom to 
Organize Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS UNDER THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS ACT.

    Section 2 of the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 152) is 
amended--
            (1) in paragraph (3), by adding at the end the following: 
        ``An individual performing any service shall be considered an 
        employee (except as provided in the previous sentence) and not 
        an independent contractor for purposes of this Act, unless--
                    ``(A) the individual is free from control and 
                direction in connection with the performance of the 
                service, both under the contract for the performance of 
                the service and in fact;
                    ``(B) the service is performed outside the usual 
                course of the business of the employer; and
                    ``(C) the individual is customarily engaged in an 
                independently established trade, occupation, 
                profession, or business of the same nature as that 
                involved in the service performed.''; and
            (2) in paragraph (11)--
                    (A) by inserting ``and for a majority of the 
                individual's work time'' after ``interest of the 
                employer'';
                    (B) by striking ``assign,''; and
                    (C) by striking ``or responsibly to direct them,''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2011269EN.01004803.xml

| 10.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/48

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 July 2011 — ratiopharm v OHIM — Nycomed (ZUFAL)

(Case T-222/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark ZUFAL - Earlier Community word mark ZURCAL - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Similarity of the goods - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Restriction of the goods designated in the trade mark application - Article 43(1) of Regulation No 207/2009)

2011/C 269/107

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ratiopharm GmbH (Ulm, Germany) (represented by: S. Völker, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: B. Schmidt, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Nycomed GmbH (Konstanz, Germany) (represented by: A. Ferchland, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 March 2010 (Case R 874/2008-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Nycomed GmbH and ratiopharm GmbH.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders ratiopharm GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders ratiopharm GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 195, 17.7.2010.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 50 (Tuesday, March 15, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14044-14045]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5923]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

[FWS-R8-FHC-2011-N044; 81331-1334-8TWG-W4]


Trinity Adaptive Management Working Group

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Trinity Adaptive Management Working Group (TAMWG) affords 
stakeholders the opportunity to give policy, management, and technical 
input concerning Trinity River (California) restoration efforts to the 
Trinity Management Council (TMC). The TMC interprets and recommends 
policy, coordinates and reviews management actions, and provides 
organizational budget oversight. This notice announces a TAMWG meeting, 
which is open to the public.

DATES: TAMWG will meet from 9:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. on Tuesday, April 12, 
2011.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Trinity County Library, 351 
Main Street, Weaverville, CA 96093.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Meeting Information: Randy A. Brown, 
TAMWG Designated Federal Officer, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1655 
Heindon Road, Arcata, CA 95521; telephone: (707) 822-7201. Trinity 
River Restoration Program (TRRP) Information: Jennifer Faler, Acting 
Executive Director, Trinity River Restoration Program, P.O. Box 1300, 
1313 South Main Street, Weaverville, CA 96093; telephone: (530) 623-
1800; e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d2b8b4b3beb7a092a7a1b0a0fcb5bda4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1b717d7a777e695b6e687969357c746d">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.), this notice announces a meeting 
of the TAMWG. The meeting will include discussion of the following 
topics:
    <bullet> Annual flow release schedule,
    <bullet> New TAMWG charter,
    <bullet> Acting Executive Director's Report,
    <bullet> Channel rehabilitation policies,
    <bullet> TRRP performance measures,
    <bullet> Membership update,
    <bullet> Election of TAMWG chair and vice-chair for 2011, and
    <bullet> TAMWG bylaws.
    Completion of the agenda is dependent on the amount of time each 
item takes. The meeting could end early if the agenda has been 
completed.


[[Page 14045]]


    Dated: March 9, 2011.
Randy A. Brown,
Designated Federal Officer, Arcata Fish and Wildlife Office, Arcata, 
CA.
[FR Doc. 2011-5923 Filed 3-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.2



Certification



Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:

> (1) I have reviewed the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Inland Monthly Income Fund II, L.P. (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;
> 
> (2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
> 
> (3) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inland Monthly Income Fund II, L.P.



By: Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation
       General Partner

/S/ Kelly Tucek

Name: Kelly Tucek
Title: Assistant Vice President of the General Partner and
         principal financial officer of Inland Monthly Income Fund II, L.P.
Date: March 26, 2004
Editorial Note on Part 284
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 284 appear at 65 FR 10222, Feb. 25, 2000.

§ 284.227 Certain transportation by intrastate pipelines. ( a ) *Blanket certificate.* A blanket certificate shall issue under this section to any intrastate pipeline that receives natural gas produced in adjacent Federal waters or onshore or offshore in an adjacent state, *provided that:* ( 1 ) The gas must be received by the intrastate pipeline from a gatherer or other intrastate pipeline;
( 2 ) The intrastate pipeline delivers the gas in the intrastate pipeline's state of operation to an end user or another intrastate pipeline; and
( 3 ) The gas ultimately used by an end user in the same state.
( b ) *Effective date.* If an intrastate pipeline is providing a transportation service described in paragraph (a) of this section as of February 1, 1992, and the service is not a qualifying service under § 284.122 of subpart C of this part, a blanket certificate shall issue under paragraph (a) of this section and become effective as of February 1, 1992. If an intrastate pipeline is not providing a transportation service described in paragraph (a) of this section as of February 1, 1992 the blanket certificate shall issue and become effective on the date that the intrastate pipeline commences such a service that is not a qualifying service under § 284.122 of subpart C of this part.
( c ) *Acceptance of certificate.* An intrastate pipeline shall be deemed to have accepted a blanket certificate under this section if it continues after February 1, 1992, a service described in paragraph (a) of this section that is not a qualifying service under § 284.122 of subpart C or commences such a service after November 4, 1991.
( d ) *Terms and conditions.* An intrastate pipeline's blanket certificate transportation authority under this section is subject to its compliance with all terms and conditions of subpart C of this part, except that service under this section does not have to be on behalf of an interstate pipeline or local distribution company served by an interstate pipeline.
( e ) *Pregrant of abandonment.* Abandonment of transportation services, pursuant to section 7(b) of the Natural Gas Act, is authorized upon the expiration of the contractual term of each individual arrangement authorized by a blanket certificate under this section.
( f ) *Effect of certificate.* Acceptance of a certificate issued under this section or conduct of activity authorized under this section will not subject the certificate holder to the Natural Gas Act jurisdiction of the Commission except to the extent necessary to enforce the terms and conditions of the certificate.
[Order 537, 56 FR 50246, Oct. 4, 1991, as amended by Order 544, 57 FR 46501, Oct. 9, 1992; Order 581, 60 FR 53074, Oct. 11, 1995]
Map Creation Date: October 03, 2022

Data Current Date: October 03, 2022

-- Public Information --

Maps created by USDA Risk Management Agency are for spatial and visual context for depicting the basic information for “where”. Maps are not considered a survey. General Reference Only.

The information displayed in this map is intended to serve as an aid in displaying data provided or stored by the Risk Management Agency. It does not modify, replace or supersede any USDA published policy provisions or procedures.

Source: USDA Risk Management Agency

Map Projection: USA Contiguous Albers Equal Area Conic

Layer Credits: PRISM & USDA RMA

Written Agreement Record Requirements

Relay Crop

RMA Insurance Services

This map depicts written agreement record requirement zones for relay crops. Insurance is available, by written agreement, in

all of the contiguous United States. Counties without soybean actuarial documents must submit an XC type written agreement

for the crop to be insurable.

Zone 1 - No Records Required

Zone 2 - Two Year Records Requirement

Zone 3 - Three Year Records Requirement

Relay Crop Zones
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-19-00108-CV

TIMOTHY WILKINS

v.

LAGUNA BAY CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.

On Appeal from the

445th District Court of Cameron County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2015-DCL-01858

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

September 17, 2020
# C_2013225EN.01001801.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/18

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 6 June 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England and Wales) (Civil Division) — United Kingdom) — The Queen, on the application of: MA, BT, DA v Secretary of State for the Home Department

(Case C-648/11) (1)

1

(Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 - Determining the Member State responsible - Unaccompanied minor - Successive applications for asylum lodged in two Member States - Absence of a member of the family of the minor in the territory of a Member State - Second paragraph of Article 6 of Regulation No 343/2003 - Transfer of the minor to the Member State in which he lodged his first application - Compatibility - Child’s best interests - Article 24(2) of the Charter)

2013/C 225/29

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Referring court

Court of Appeal (England and Wales) (Civil Division)

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: The Queen, on the application of: MA, BT, DA

Applicant:

Defendant: Secretary of State for the Home Department

Defendant:

Intervener: The AIRE Centre (Advice on Individual Rights in Europe) (UK)

Intervener:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Court of Appeal (England and Wales) (Civil Division) — Interpretation of the second paragraph of Article 6 of Council Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 of 18 February 2003 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national (OJ 2003 L 50, p. 1) — Procedure for determining the Member State responsible for examining asylum applications lodged by unaccompanied minors who are third-country nationals

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The second paragraph of Article 6 of Council Regulation (EC) No 343/2003 of 18 February 2003 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an asylum application lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national must be interpreted as meaning that, in circumstances such as those of the main proceedings, where an unaccompanied minor with no member of his family legally present in the territory of a Member State has lodged asylum applications in more than one Member State, the Member State in which that minor is present after having lodged an asylum application there is to be designated the ‘Member State responsible’.

---

(1)  OJ C 65, 3.3.2012.

1

---
SET THEM UP FOR SUCCESS IN 

AND OUT OF THE CLASSROOM.

Support kids’ overall health and wellness by being informed.

It’s important to talk with kids about the risks of underage drinking and substance 

use from a young age, and continue those conversations as they get older 

and become more independent. For tips on how—and when—to begin the 

conversation, visit 

www.underagedrinking.samhsa.gov

#TalkTheyHearYou PEP20-03-01-039
#MyPreventionStory