alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2701. Congressional findings and purpose

(a) The Congress finds that—

(1) existing automobile propulsion systems, on the average, fall short of meeting the long-term goals of the Nation with respect to environmental protection, and energy conservation;

(2) advanced alternatives to existing automobile propulsion systems could, with sufficient research and development effort, meet these long-term goals, and have the potential to be mass produced at reasonable cost; and advanced automobile propulsion systems could operate with significantly less adverse environmental impact and fuel consumption than existing automobiles, while meeting all of the other requirements of Federal law;

(3) insufficient resources are being devoted to both research on and development of advanced automobile propulsion system technology;

(4) an expanded research and development effort with respect to advance automobile propulsion system technology would complement and stimulate corresponding efforts by the private sector and would encourage automobile manufacturers to consider seriously the incorporation of such advanced technology into automobiles and automobile components; and

(5) the Nation's energy and environmental problems are urgent, and therefore advanced automobile propulsion system technology should be developed, tested, demonstrated, and prepared for manufacture within the shortest practicable time.

(b) It is therefore the purpose of the Congress, in this chapter to—

(1)(A) direct the Department of Energy to make contracts and grants for research and development leading to the development of advanced automobile propulsion systems within 5 years of February 25, 1978, or within the shortest practicable time consistent with appropriate research and development techniques, and (B) evaluate and disseminate information with respect to advanced automobile propulsion system technology;

(2) preserve, enhance, and facilitate competition in research, development, and production with respect to existing and alternative automobile propulsion systems; and

(3) supplement, but neither supplant nor duplicate, the automotive propulsion system research and development efforts of private industry.

(Pub. L. 95–238, title III, §302, Feb. 25, 1978, 92 Stat. 78.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 95–238, title III, §301, Feb. 25, 1978, 92 Stat. 78, provided that: "This title [enacting this chapter and amending section 2451 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare] may be cited as the 'Automotive Propulsion Research and Development Act of 1978'."
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 48 (Friday, March 11, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 13428]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5610]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[AA-6690-A2; LLAK965000-L14100000-KC0000-P]


Alaska Native Claims Selection

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of decision approving lands for conveyance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As required by 43 CFR 2650.7(d), notice is hereby given that 
the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) will issue an appealable decision 
to Pedro Bay Corporation. The decision approves the surface estate in 
the lands described below for conveyance pursuant to the Alaska Native 
Claims Settlement Act. The subsurface estate in these lands will be 
conveyed to Bristol Bay Native Corporation when the surface estate is 
conveyed to Pedro Bay Corporation. The lands are in the vicinity of 
Pedro Bay, Alaska, and are located in:

Seward Meridian, Alaska

T. 4 S., R. 30 W.,
    Sec. 14, lot 2.
    Containing 409.69 acres.

T. 5 S., R. 30 W.,
    Sec. 2, lots 4, 5, and 6;
    Sec. 21, lots 2, 3, and 4;
    Sec. 34, lots 2 and 3.
    Containing 13.41 acres.
    Aggregating 423.10 acres.

    Notice of the decision will also be published four times in the 
Bristol Bay Times.
    DATES: Any party claiming a property interest in the lands affected 
by the decision may appeal the decision within the following time 
limits:
    1. Unknown parties, parties unable to be located after reasonable 
efforts have been expended to locate, parties who fail or refuse to 
sign their return receipt, and parties who receive a copy of the 
decision by regular mail which is not certified, return receipt 
requested, shall have until April 11, 2011 to file an appeal.
    2. Parties receiving service of the decision by certified mail 
shall have 30 days from the date of receipt to file an appeal.
    Parties who do not file an appeal in accordance with the 
requirements of 43 CFR part 4, subpart E, shall be deemed to have 
waived their rights.

ADDRESSES: A copy of the decision may be obtained from: Bureau of Land 
Management, Alaska State Office, 222 West Seventh Avenue, <greek-i>13, 
Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7504.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The BLM by phone at 907-271-5960, by 
e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#65040e4b0709084b060a0b13001c040b0600250709084b020a13"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="95f4febbf7f9f8bbf6fafbe3f0ecf4fbf6f0d5f7f9f8bbf2fae3">[email protected]</span></a>, or by telecommunication device 
(TTD) through the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-
877-8339, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

Jason Robinson,
Land Law Examiner, Land Transfer Adjudication II Branch.
[FR Doc. 2011-5610 Filed 3-10-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JA-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 13.2

STATEMENT OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF  ARCADIS NV  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  § 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of ARCADIS NV (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Henk W.M.W. ten Cate, Corporate Director of Finance of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



|Date: June 4, 2004 |  | By: | /s/HENK W.M.W. TEN CATEHenk W.M.W. ten Cate
Corporate Director of Finance
(Principal Financial Officer)
|------------------ |  | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                          2,025,100
<SECURITIES>                    0      <F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                   378
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                0
<PP&E>                          9,948,693     <F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                  242,556
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  11,922,018
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           0
<BONDS>                         0        <F3>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        11,796,728    <F4>
<OTHER-SE>                      0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    11,922,018
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                1,200,503  <F5>
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   482,532   <F6>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0       <F7>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0           <F8>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0       <F9>
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    717,971
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   0
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0

<FN>
<F1>   "SECURITIES" REPRESENTS INVESTMENT IN JOINT VENTURE
<F2>   "PP&E" REPRESENTS INVESTMENT IN REAL ESTATE [LAND AND
BUILDING]
<F3>   "BONDS" REPRESENTS MORTGAGES PAYABLE
<F4>   "COMMON" REPRESENTS TOTAL PARTNERS CAPITAL
<F5>   "TOTAL REVENUES" REPRESENTS RENTAL, INTEREST, AND OTHER INCOME
<F6>   "TOTAL COSTS" REPRESENTS TOTAL EXPENSES LESS PROVISION FOR
INVESTMENT PROPERTY IMPAIRMENT
<F7>   "OTHER EXPENSES" REPRESENTS INTEREST IN JOINT VENTURES' NET
INCOME/LOSS
<F8>   "LOSS PROVISION" REPRESENTS PROVISION FOR INVESTMENT PROPERTY
IMPAIRMENT
<F9>   "EXTRAORDINARY" REPRESENTS EXTRAORDINARY GAIN ON
EXTINGUISHMENT OF ANNEX DEBT
</FN>


</TABLE>
§ 380.3 Environmental information to be supplied by an applicant. ( a ) An applicant must submit information as follows: ( 1 ) For any proposed action identified in §§ 380.5 and 380.6, an environmental report with the proposal as prescribed in paragraph (c) of this section.
( 2 ) For any proposal not identified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, any environmental information that the Commission may determine is necessary for compliance with these regulations, the regulations of the Council, NEPA and other Federal laws such as the Endangered Species Act, the National Historic Preservation Act or the Coastal Zone Management Act.
( b ) An applicant must also: ( 1 ) Provide all necessary or relevant information to the Commission;
( 2 ) Conduct any studies that the Commission staff considers necessary or relevant to determine the impact of the proposal on the human environment and natural resources;
( 3 ) Consult with appropriate Federal, regional, State, and local agencies during the planning stages of the proposed action to ensure that all potential environmental impacts are identified. (The specific requirements for consultation on hydropower projects are contained in § 4.38 and § 16.8 of this chapter and in section 4(a) of the Electric Consumers Protection Act, Pub. L. No. 99-495, 100 Stat. 1243, 1246 (1986));
( 4 ) Submit applications for all Federal and State approvals as early as possible in the planning process; and
( 5 ) Notify the Commission staff of all other Federal actions required for completion of the proposed action so that the staff may coordinate with other interested Federal agencies.
( c ) *Content of an applicant's environmental report for specific proposals* — ( 1 ) *Hydropower projects.* The information required for specific project applications under part 4 or 16 of this chapter.
( 2 ) *Natural gas projects.* ( i ) For any application filed under the Natural Gas Act for any proposed action identified in §§ 380.5 or 380.6, except for prior notice filings under § 157.208, as described in § 380.5(b), the information identified in § 380.12 and Appendix A of this part.
( ii ) For prior notice filings under § 157.208, the report described by § 157.208(c)(11) of this chapter.
( 3 ) *Electric transmission project.* For pre-filing requests and applications filed under section 216 of the Federal Power Act identified in §§ 380.5(b)(14) and 380.6(a)(5).
[Order 486, 52 FR 47910, Dec. 17, 1987, as amended by Order 533, 56 FR 23155, May 20, 1991; Order 603, 64 FR 26611, May 14, 1999; Order 689, 71 FR 69470, Dec. 1, 2006; Order 756, 77 FR 4895, Feb. 1, 2012]
# C_2011219EN.01000702.xml

| 23.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 219/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 219/7

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Gdańsku (Republic of Poland), lodged on 11 May 2011 — Forta Sp. z o.o. v Dyrektor Izby Celnej w Gdyni

(Case C-217/11)

2011/C 219/09

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Referring court

Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Gdańsku

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Forta Sp. z o.o.

Applicant:

Defendant: Dyrektor Izby Celnej w Gdyni

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Must Article 1(11) of Directive 98/34/EC of 22 June 1998 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations (1) and of rules on Information Society services be interpreted as meaning that the term ‘technical regulation’, the draft of which must be communicated to the Commission pursuant to Article 8(1) of that directive, includes a legislative measure which prohibits the issuing of authorisations to carry on an activity involving gaming on low-value-prize machines?

1

---

(1)  Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 1998 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations (OJ 1998 L 204, p. 37), as amended by Directive 98/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 July 1998 amending Directive 98/34/EC laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations (OJ 1998 L 217, p. 18).

1

---
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 August 12, 2008
    By:
    /s/ Rocco B. CommissoRocco B. CommissoChairman and Chief Executive OfficerBy:
    /s/ Mark E. StephanMark E. StephanExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T21:21:23-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
#### § 1300.103 General conduct prejudicial to TVA.

An employee shall not engage in criminal, infamous, dishonest, immoral, or notoriously disgraceful conduct, or other conduct prejudicial to TVA.
# C_2011179EN.01001502.xml

| 18.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/15

---

Order of the General Court of 8 April 2011 — Martin v Commission

(Case T-291/10) (1)

1

(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Implied refusal of access - Explicit decision adopted after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate)

2011/C 179/27

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Anne Martin (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: U. O’Dwyer, solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Costa de Oliveira and C. ten Dam, agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the applicant: Kingdom of Denmark (represented by: S. Juul Jørgensen, agent)

Intervener in support of the applicant

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission's implied decision of 20 April 2010 refusing the applicant access to the documents in the file relating to the State aid N 654/2008, notified by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland on 19 December 2008, in favour of Short Brothers plc.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that there is no need to adjudicate on this action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that there is no need to adjudicate on this action.

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Ms Anne Martin. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Ms Anne Martin.

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of Denmark to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of Denmark to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 234, 28.8.2010.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Gilman Ciocia, Inc. (the
"Company") for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, Michael Ryan,
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


By:   /s/ Michael Ryan
      --------------------------
Name: Michael Ryan
      Chief Executive Officer

Date: September 26, 2008
### §7261. Disclosures in periodic reports

#### (a) Omitted

#### (b) Commission rules on pro forma figures

Not later than 180 days after July 30, 2002, the Commission shall issue final rules providing that pro forma financial information included in any periodic or other report filed with the Commission pursuant to the securities laws, or in any public disclosure or press or other release, shall be presented in a manner that—

(1) does not contain an untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the pro forma financial information, in light of the circumstances under which it is presented, not misleading; and

(2) reconciles it with the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer under generally accepted accounting principles.

#### (c) Study and report on special purpose entities

#### (1) Study required

The Commission shall, not later than 1 year after the effective date of adoption of off-balance sheet disclosure rules required by section 78m(j) of this title, complete a study of filings by issuers and their disclosures to determine—

(A) the extent of off-balance sheet transactions, including assets, liabilities, leases, losses, and the use of special purpose entities; and

(B) whether generally accepted accounting rules result in financial statements of issuers reflecting the economics of such off-balance sheet transactions to investors in a transparent fashion.

#### (2) Report and recommendations

Not later than 6 months after the date of completion of the study required by paragraph (1), the Commission shall submit a report to the President, the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate, and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives, setting forth—

(A) the amount or an estimate of the amount of off-balance sheet transactions, including assets, liabilities, leases, and losses of, and the use of special purpose entities by, issuers filing periodic reports pursuant to section 78m or 78o of this title;

(B) the extent to which special purpose entities are used to facilitate off-balance sheet transactions;

(C) whether generally accepted accounting principles or the rules of the Commission result in financial statements of issuers reflecting the economics of such transactions to investors in a transparent fashion;

(D) whether generally accepted accounting principles specifically result in the consolidation of special purpose entities sponsored by an issuer in cases in which the issuer has the majority of the risks and rewards of the special purpose entity; and

(E) any recommendations of the Commission for improving the transparency and quality of reporting off-balance sheet transactions in the financial statements and disclosures required to be filed by an issuer with the Commission.

(Pub. L. 107–204, title IV, §401, July 30, 2002, 116 Stat. 785.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is comprised of section 401 of Pub. L. 107–204. Subsec. (a) of section 401 of Pub. L. 107–204 amended section 78m of this title.
# C_2013252EN.01000701.xml

| 31.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/7

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 July 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Bíróság — Hungary) — Gábor Csonka, Tibor Isztli, Dávid Juhász, János Kiss, Csaba Szontágh v Magyar Állam

(Case C-409/11) (1)

1

(Use of motor vehicles - Insurance against civil liability - Directive 72/166/EEC - Article 3(1) - Directive 84/5/EEC - Article 1(4), first subparagraph - Insolvency of the insurer - No payment of compensation by the body providing compensation)

2013/C 252/09

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Referring court

Fővárosi Bíróság

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Gábor Csonka, Tibor Isztli, Dávid Juhász, János Kiss, Csaba Szontágh

Applicants:

Defendant: Magyar Állam

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Fővárosi Bíróság — Interpretation of Council Directive 72/166/EEC of 24 April 1972 on the approximation of the laws of Member States relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles, and to the enforcement of the obligation to insure against such liability (OJ, English Special Edition 1972 (II), p. 360) — Obligation for the Member States to take the measures necessary to ensure that all compulsory insurance policies against civil liability cover the whole of the territory of the Community — Withdrawal of a motor vehicle insurance company’s operating licence, giving rise to an obligation on the part of individuals who had concluded contracts with that insurance company to answer personally, using their own assets, for the damage they caused to others — State liability in cases of incorrect transposition of a directive

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 3(1) of Council Directive 72/166/EEC of 24 April 1972 on the approximation of the laws of Member States relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles, and to the enforcement of the obligation to insure against such liability, as amended by Directive 2005/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005, read in the light of Article 1(4) of Second Council Directive 84/5/EEC of 30 December 1983 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles, as amended by Directive 2005/14, must be interpreted as not including, among the obligations which that provision imposes on Member States, that of establishing a body to ensure that compensation is provided to victims of road accidents in situations where, although the persons responsible for the damage had taken out insurance covering their civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles, the insurer has become insolvent.

---

(1)  OJ C 347, 26.11.2011.

1

---