alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 319.260 Luncheon meat.

“Luncheon Meat” is a cured, cooked meat food product made from comminuted meat. Mechanically Separated (Species) may be used in accordance with § 319.6. To facilitate chopping or mixing or to dissolve the usual curing ingredients, water or ice may be used in the preparation of luncheon meat in an amount not to exceed 3 percent of the total ingredients.

[35 FR 15597, Oct. 3, 1970, as amended at 43 FR 26425, June 20, 1978; 47 FR 28257, June 29, 1982]
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Seeks Applications to Improve, Repair or Modify Off-Farm Labor Housing 

Properties

WASHINGTON, March 9, 2022 – USDA Rural Development Under Secretary Xochitl Torres Small today 

announced the Department is seeking applications to improve or repair off-farm labor housing. These 

improvements will ensure farmworkers continue to have equitable access to safe, affordable places to live.

Subject to the availability of funds, USDA will provide the loans and grants through the Farm Labor Housing 

Program. Eligible recipients are broad-based nonprofit organizations, nonprofit organizations of farmworkers, 

federally recognized Indian tribes, community organizations, and agencies or political subdivisions of State or 

local governments that currently own a Section 514 Off-Farm Labor Housing property. The funds may be used 

to improve, repair or modify off-farm labor housing properties. 

USDA is offering priority points to projects that advance key priorities under the Biden-Harris Administration 

to help communities recover from the COVID-19 pandemic, advance equity and combat climate change. These 

extra points will increase the likelihood of funding for projects seeking to address these critical challenges in 

rural America.

The deadline for preapplications is April 25, 2022, 12:00 p.m., EST. Final applications must be submitted by 

Aug. 29, 2022, 12:00 p.m., EST.

For additional information, including instructions on how to apply, see page 13374 of the March 9, 2022, 

Federal Register.

If you’d like to subscribe to USDA Rural Development updates, visit our GovDelivery subscriber page.

###

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender.
§ 16.20 Applications for subsequent license for a project with an expiring license not subject to sections 14 and 15 of the Federal Power Act. ( a ) *Applicability.* This section applies to an application for subsequent license for a project with an expiring license that is not subject to sections 14 and 15 of the Federal Power Act.
( b ) *Licensing proceeding.* ( 1 ) An applicant for a license for a project with an expiring license not subject to sections 14 and 15 of the Federal Power Act must file its application under Part I of the Federal Power Act.
( 2 ) The provisions of section 7(a) of the Federal Power Act do not apply to licensing proceedings involving an application described in paragraph (b)(1).
( c ) *Requirement to file.* An applicant must file an application for subsequent license at least 24 months before the expiration of the existing license.
( d ) *Requirements for and processing of applications.* An application for subsequent license must meet the requirements of, and will be processed in accordance with, §§ 16.5, 16.8, 16.9(b)(2), 16.9(b)(3), 16.9(b)(4), 16.9(c), and 16.9(d).
( e ) *Applicant notice.* An applicant for subsequent license or exemption that proposes to expand an existing project to encompass additional lands must include in its application a statement that the applicant has notified, by certified mail, property owners on the additional lands to be encompassed by the project and governmental agencies and subdivisions likely to be interested in or affected by the proposed expansion.
[Order 513, 54 FR 23806, June 2, 1989, as amended by Order 2002, 68 FR 51142, Aug. 25, 2003]
#### § 367.4181 Account 418.1, Equity in earnings of subsidiary companies.

This account must include the service company's equity in the earnings or losses of subsidiary companies for the year.
Exhibit 20.1

Chase Manhattan Grantor Trust 1996-A

From: The Chase Manhattan Bank

To:   Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.


                   MONTHLY CERTIFICATEHOLDER'S REPORT
                   ----------------------------------

Due Period 11 Beginning Date                     12/01/1996
Due Period 11 End Date                           12/31/1996
Determination Date                               01/10/1997
Remittance Date                                  01/15/1997


I.    Monthly Principal and Principal Carryover Shortfall to Certificateholders
      (Per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                  $ 26.3371279410

II.   Monthly Interest and Unpaid Interest to Certificateholders
      (Per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                   $ 2.9864063247

III.  Monthly Expenses Summary

      A. Servicing Fee Disbursement                                $ 846,682.81
      B. Cash Collateral Account Expense                                 $ 0.00
      C. Total Expenses paid
         (per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                $ 0.5743089062

IV.   Cash Collateral Account Deposit Amount                             $ 0.00

V.    Outstanding Advance Summary

      A. From Prior Period                                       $ 3,893,879.32
      B. From Current Period                                     $ 3,951,543.23
      C. Change in Amount Between Periods (Lines B - A)             $ 57,663.91

VI.   Pool Factor Information

      A. Certificate Principal Balance                         $ 977,191,501.73
      B. Initial Certificate Balance                         $ 1,474,263,764.33
      C. Pool Factor (Lines A / B)                               0.662833561655

VII.  Available Cash Collateral Account Information for Due Period

      A. Available Cash Collateral Amount                       $ 50,800,968.76
      B. Available Cash Collateral Amount Percentage            5.000000000443%

VIII. Required Cash Collateral Amount

      A. For the Current Collection Period                      $ 50,800,968.76
      B. For the Next Collection Period                         $ 48,859,575.09
#### § 1314.7 Liability of TVA and Reserve Banks.

TVA and the Reserve Banks may rely on the information provided in a transfer message and are not required to verify the information. TVA and the Reserve Banks shall not be liable for any action taken in accordance with the information set out in a transfer message or evidence submitted in support thereof.

[62 FR 920, Jan. 7, 1997; 62 FR 4833, Jan. 31, 1997]
§ 35.31 Commission review. ( a ) *Procedures.* Filings under this subpart are subject to the procedures applicable to other filings under section 205 of the Federal Power Act, as the Commission deems appropriate.
( b ) *Commission standard.* With respect to any filing under this subpart, the Commission will determine whether the ASC set by BPA for the applicable exchange period was determined in accordance with the ASC methodology set forth at 18 CFR 301.1. If the ASC is not in accord with the methodology, the Commission will order that BPA amend the ASC to conform with the methodology. If the ASC is in accord with the methodology, the rate is deemed just and reasonable.
( c ) *Refunds and adjustments.* ( 1 ) Any ASC-based rate charged by a public utility under this subpart pending Commission order is subject to refund or to adjustment that increases the ASC-based rate.
( 2 ) Any interest on refunds ordered by the Commission under this subpart is computed in accordance with 18 CFR 35.19a. Interest on any increase ordered by the Commission will be at the rate charged to BPA by the U.S. Treasury during that period, unless the Commission orders another interest rate.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1902-0096) [Order 337, 48 FR 46976, Oct. 17, 1983, as amended at 49 FR 1177, Jan. 10, 1984]
#### § 376.103 Mission.

The Commission is responsible for developing, managing, and directing energy regulatory programs and activities assigned to it by statute, executive orders, or by the Secretary, DOE. The Chairman serves as the chief executive officer of the Commission and is responsible for the conduct of all Commission executive and administrative functions. In carrying out its mission, the Commission and its employees are not subject to the supervision or direction of any other official of DOE.
No. 19,681.

#### John Mark Nothaus *v.*Robert A. Theobald, Director of Revenue.

(363 P. [2d] 184)

Decided July 3, 1961.

Rehearing denied July 31, 1961.

Mr. John C. Young, Jr., for petitioner.

Mr. Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General, Mr. Frank E. Hickey, Deputy, Mr. Charles S. Thomas, Assistant, for respondent.

*En Banc.*

Mr. Justice Moore

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case was consolidated for hearing in this court with cause No. 19,620, People *v. John Mark*Nothaus, am *220nounced this day. Facts pertinent to the instant action will be found in the opinion in that case and will not be repeated here.

In this original proceeding Nothaus filed' his 'petition in which he sets forth facts-shown in the opinion above mentioned. In addition he alleges that notwithstanding that he was found not guilty of any wrongdoing,, by the county court of Teller county, and notwithstanding that he applied to the above named respondent for a renewal of his driver’s license prior to the time it would otherwise have legally expired, respondent refused to renew the same because of the existence of a “red flag” upon his card in the files of the director’s office. As shown by our opinion in cause No. 19,620, the license of Nothaus was illegally suspended and no lawful reason existed at any time why his license should not have been renewed at the time the request therefor was made.

Because of the delay involved in the unjustified refusal of respondent to renew the license, the time has elapsed within which Nothaus was entitled to renewal without extended re-examination. The director of' revenue takes the position that he cannot now renew the license unless Nothaus submits to the extended examination which was required of him when his license was first issued. The respondent is mistaken. Nothaus was entitled to a renewal of his license at the time he applied for that renewal. The denial of that request was without legal justification. Respondent cannot now impose any additional burden upon Nothaus in the matter of securing a renewal of his license which did not exist at the time the application for renewal was unlawfully denied. The controlling date in this connection is the date upon which the renewal request was made and denied. Everything to which Nothaus was entitled at that time, he is entitled to receive now. The showing made by respondent is insufficient to warrant denial of the relief prayed by Nothaus and the rule accordingly is made absolute

*221Mr. Justice Doyle and Mr. Justice McWilliams dissent.

Mr. Justice McWilliams

dissenting:

I dissent for reasons more fully set forth in my dissenting opinion filed in Case No. 19,620, decided this date.

Mr. Justice Doyle concurs in this dissenting opinion.
Meaningful Roles for Peer Providers in 

Integrated Healthcare: A Guide

This 167-page toolkit, written by the California Association 

of Social Rehabilitation Agencies in collaboration with 

other provider and service agencies, includes a chapter on 

the supervision of peer workers. Other topics include the 

basics of peer support practice, leadership development, 

and financing peer support. Download the PDF at http://

www.casra.org/docs/peer_provider_toolkit.pdf.

Peer Support Toolkit 

Philadelphia’s Department of Behavioral Health and 

Intellectual Disability Services’ toolkit supports behavioral 

health treatment agencies with integrating peer providers 

into their service settings. Structured as an interactive PDF 

in four easy-to-read sections, the toolkit incorporates many 

promising practices and resources relevant to leadership, 

supervisors, and peer staff. For more information and to 

download the free toolkit, visit https://dbhids.org/peersupport-toolkit.

For a quick tutorial in how to use the Peer Support Toolkit,

follow this link to a YouTube video: https://youtu.be/

IinLpwRvcMs.

Program Development Guide: Ongoing 

Monitoring, Supervision, and Support

Peers for Progress promotes peer support as a key part of 

health, health care, and prevention around the world. The 

mission of Peers for Progress is to accelerate the availability 

of best practices in peer support. To learn more, go to 

http://peersforprogress.org/resource-guide/ongoingmonitoring-supervision-and-support.

Supervisor Guide: Peer Support Whole 

Health and Wellness

This guide for supervisors outlines the role and 

responsibilities of peer workers who support the whole 

health and wellness of people living with mental illness 

and co-occurring health problems. The guide details the 

supportive actions of the supervisor.

Core Competencies for Peer Workers in 

Behavioral Health Services

The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services 

Administration directed BRSS TACS to identify and 

describe the core competencies needed to provide peer 

support services to individuals with or in recovery from 

mental illness or substance use disorder. This document 

describes the 61 competencies used by peer recovery 

support workers in behavioral health services. These 

competencies, which promote best practices in peer 

support, can guide the creation of job descriptions, 

train peer workers, and help set certification standards. 

Download the PDF at https://www.samhsa.gov/sites/

default/files/programs_campaigns/brss_tacs/corecompetencies.pdf.

Resources for the 

Supervision of 

Peer Workers

The resources on this list provide education on peer support practices, best 

practices in supervision, and recovery-oriented services.

This document was supported by contract number 

HHAA2832012000351/HHSS28342002T from the Substance 

Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). 

The views, opinions, and content of the document are those of 

the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, or 

policies of SAMHSA or the U.S. Department of Health and Human 

Services (HHS).
#### § 380.1 Purpose.

The regulations in this part implement the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's procedures under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). These regulations supplement the regulations of the Council on Environmental Quality, 40 CFR parts 1500 through 1508. The Commission will comply with the regulations of the Council on Environmental Quality except where those regulations are inconsistent with the statutory requirements of the Commission.

[Order 486, 52 FR 47910, Dec. 17, 1987, as amended by Order 756, 77 FR 4895, Feb. 1, 2012]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
EXHIBIT 27.2:  RESTATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's November 30, 1998 Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0000016918
<NAME> CANANDAIGUA BRANDS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1998
<CASH>                                           2,141
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  173,760
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    460,061
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               659,322
<PP&E>                                         376,872
<DEPRECIATION>                                 129,373
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,186,246
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          395,657
<BONDS>                                        291,386
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           217
<OTHER-SE>                                     434,631
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,186,246
<SALES>                                      1,037,900
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,037,900
<CGS>                                          726,908
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  726,908
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 84,731
<INCOME-TAX>                                    34,740
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             49,991
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    49,991
<EPS-BASIC>                                     2.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.66




</TABLE>
### §7409. Coordination of Federal cyber security research and development

The Director of the National Science Foundation and the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology shall coordinate the research programs authorized by this chapter or pursuant to amendments made by this chapter. The Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall work with the Director of the National Science Foundation and the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology to ensure that programs authorized by this chapter or pursuant to amendments made by this chapter are taken into account in any government-wide cyber security research effort.

(Pub. L. 107–305, §13, Nov. 27, 2002, 116 Stat. 2380.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 107–305, Nov. 27, 2002, 116 Stat. 2367, known as the Cyber Security Research and Development Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 7401 of this title.
### §80a–46. Validity of contracts

#### (a) Waiver of compliance as void

Any condition, stipulation, or provision binding any person to waive compliance with any provision of this subchapter or with any rule, regulation, or order thereunder shall be void.

#### (b) Equitable results; rescission; severance

(1) A contract that is made, or whose performance involves, a violation of this subchapter, or of any rule, regulation, or order thereunder, is unenforceable by either party (or by a nonparty to the contract who acquired a right under the contract with knowledge of the facts by reason of which the making or performance violated or would violate any provision of this subchapter or of any rule, regulation, or order thereunder) unless a court finds that under the circumstances enforcement would produce a more equitable result than nonenforcement and would not be inconsistent with the purposes of this subchapter.

(2) To the extent that a contract described in paragraph (1) has been performed, a court may not deny rescission at the instance of any party unless such court finds that under the circumstances the denial of rescission would produce a more equitable result than its grant and would not be inconsistent with the purposes of this subchapter.

(3) This subsection shall not apply (A) to the lawful portion of a contract to the extent that it may be severed from the unlawful portion of the contract, or (B) to preclude recovery against any person for unjust enrichment.

(Aug. 22, 1940, ch. 686, title I, §47, 54 Stat. 845; Pub. L. 96–477, title I, §104, Oct. 21, 1980, 94 Stat. 2277.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1980—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 96–477 provided that a contract whose terms violated this subchapter or any rule, regulation, or order thereunder would be unenforceable by either party or by a nonparty to the contract who acquired a right under such contract with knowledge of the facts by reason of which the making or performance of the contract would violate this subchapter, struck out provisions declaring such contracts void as regards the rights of the violators or nonparties to the contract with actual knowledge of its illegality, authorized the court to enforce such contracts where the court found that under the circumstances enforcement would produce a more equitable result than nonenforcement and such enforcement would not be inconsistent with the purposes of this subchapter, authorized the same two-part test to save from rescission any portions of such contracts which had been performed, and provided that subsec. (b) was not to apply to a lawful portion of a contract to the extent it could be severed from an unlawful portion of such contract, or to preclude recovery against any person for unjust enrichment.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH 

					NO. 2-05-364-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF T.B AND R.S.B., CHILDREN	

	----------

	FROM THE 211TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

	----------

		MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	------------

	On October 18, 2005 and November 16, 2005, we notified appellant, in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless the $125 filing fee was paid.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).  Appellant has not paid the $125 filing fee.  See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

	Because appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court’s order of July 21, 1998,2 we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

	Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:  GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.

DELIVERED: January 12, 2006