alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 12, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 2128]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-583]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel, Loan Repayment Program Review.
    Date: February 1, 2011.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 11 a.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892. (Virtual Meeting.)
    Contact Person: Tony L Creazzo, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood 
Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7180, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924. 
301-435-0725. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ea89988f8b9090859e86aa878b8386c4848382c48d859c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4a29382f2b3030253e260a272b232664242322642d253c">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 6, 2011.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-583 Filed 1-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 301.3 Filing procedures. ( a ) *Bonneville's ASC review procedures.* The procedures established by Bonneville's Administrator provide the filing requirements for all Utilities that file an Appendix 1 with Bonneville. Utilities must file Appendix 1s, ASC forecast models, and other required documents with Bonneville in compliance with Bonneville's ASC review procedures.
( b ) *Exchange Period.* The Exchange Period will be equal to the term of Bonneville's Rate Period. ASCs will change during the Exchange Period only for the reasons provided in § 301.4.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                     CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

      This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal
Procedures) of the United States Code and shall not be relied on by any person
for any other purpose.

      The undersigned, who is the Chief Executive Officer of S1 Corporation (the
"Company"), hereby certifies as follows:

      To the knowledge of the undersigned, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
the Company (the "Report"), which accompanies this Certificate, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, and all information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

      Dated this 9th day of August 2004.

                                     /s/ JAIME W. ELLERTSON
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Jaime W. Ellertson, Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE PILOT
NETWORK SERVICES, INC. FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          19,617
<SECURITIES>                                       891
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,267
<ALLOWANCES>                                       500
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,382
<PP&E>                                          46,745
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,357
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  60,820
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,440
<BONDS>                                          6,700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     11,450
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,215
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    60,820
<SALES>                                         11,537
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,537
<CGS>                                            9,690
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,690
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,153
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (448)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,754)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,754)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.382)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.382)


</TABLE>
### §78rr. Data standards for security-based swap reporting

#### (a) Requirement

The Commission shall, by rule, adopt data standards for all reports related to security-based swaps that are required under this chapter.

#### (b) Consistency

The data standards required under subsection (a) shall incorporate, and ensure compatibility with (to the extent feasible), all applicable data standards established in the rules promulgated under section 5334 of title 12, including, to the extent practicable, by having the characteristics described in clauses (i) through (vi) of subsection (c)(1)(B) of such section 5334.

(June 6, 1934, ch. 404, title I, §41, as added Pub. L. 117–263, div. E, title LVIII, §5821(h), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3427.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (a), was in the original "this Act". See References in Text note set out under section 78a of this title.

#### Codification

Pub. L. 117–263, which directed amendment of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by adding this section at the end, is reflected in the source credit above as adding this section to title I of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Rule of Construction—No New Disclosure Requirements

Enactment of section not to be construed to require certain additional information to be collected or disclosed, see section 5826 of Pub. L. 117–263, set out as a note under section 77g of this title.
#### § 367.4310 Account 431, Other interest expense.

This account must include all interest charges not provided for elsewhere.
FORM APPROVED

OMB NO. 0575-0042

CONTRACT NO. Form RD 1924-18

(Rev. 6-97)

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

 RURAL DEVELOPMENT

 FARM SERVICE AGENCY PARTIAL PAYMENT ESTIMATE NO.

PARTIAL PAYMENT ESTIMATE

PAGE

OWNER: CONTRACTOR: PERIOD OF ESTIMATE

FROM TO

CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY ESTIMATE

Agency Approval Amount

No. 1. Original Contract

Date Additions Deductions

2. Change Orders

3. Revised Contract (1 + 2)

4. Work Completed*

5. Stored Materials*

6. Subtotal (4 + 5)

7. Retainage*

8. Previous Payments

9. Amount Due (6-7-8)

TOTALS * Detailed breakdown attached

NET CHANGE

CONTRACT TIME

Original (days)

Revised On Schedule Yes Starting Date

Remaining No Projected Completion

CONTRACTOR'S CERTIFICATION: ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION:

The undersigned certifies that the work has been carefully

inspected and to the best of their knowledge and belief, the

quantities shown in this estimate are correct and the work has

been performed in accordance with the contract documents.

The undersigned Contractor certifies that to the best of their

knowledge, information and belief the work covered by this

payment estimate has been completed in accordance with

the contract documents, that all amounts have been paid by

the contractor for work for which previous payment estimates

was issued and payments received from the owner, and that

current payment shown herein is now due.

Architect or Engineer

Contractor

By

By

Date

Date

ACCEPTED BY AGENCY:

The review and acceptance of this estimate does not attest to

the correctness of the quantities shown or that the work has

been performed in accordance with the contract documents.

APPROVED BY OWNER:

Owner

By

By Title

Date Date

According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control

number for this information collection is 0575-0042. The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average 30 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing

instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed and completing and reviewing the collection of information.

RD 1924-18 (Rev. 6-97)
TYPICAL UNIT PRICE BREAKDOWN *

CONTRACT (revised) THIS PERIOD TOTAL TO DATE %

COM- UNIT

PRICE

ITEM DESCRIPTION

QUANTITY AMOUNT QUANTITY AMOUNT QUANTITY AMOUNT PLETE

TOTALS

TYPICAL STORED MATERIALS

AND RETAINAGE BREAKDOWN *

TYPICAL LUMP SUM PRICE BREAKDOWN *

WORK COMPLETED % MATERIALS STORED AT END OF THIS PAYMENT PERIOD

SCHEDULED COM-

 VALUE UNIT

VALUE

ITEM DESCRIPTION THIS PERIOD TO DATE DESCRIPTION QUANTITY AMOUNT PLETE

RETAINAGE

THIS ESTIMATE PERCENT RETAINED

%

WORK COMPLETED:

STORED MATERIALS:

OTHER (explain)

TOTALS TOTAL

* As a minimum, detailed breakdowns should contain this information.

RD 1924-18

REVERSE
#### § 72.15 Owners assume responsibility; must execute agreement prior to dipping or treatment waiving all claims against United States.

When the cattle are to be dipped under APHIS supervision the owner of the cattle, offered for shipment, or his agent duly authorized thereto, shall first execute and deliver to an APHIS inspector an application for inspection and supervised dipping wherein he shall agree to waive all claims against the United States for any loss or damage to said cattle occasioned by or resulting from dipping or other treatment under this part, or resulting from any subsequent treatment prior to their interstate shipment, or resulting from the fact that they are later found to be still tick infested, and also for all subsequent loss or damage to any other cattle in the possession or control of such owner which may come into contact with the cattle so dipped or treated.

[28 FR 5940, June 13, 1963, as amended at 56 FR 51975, Oct. 17, 1991]
SERVED: OCTOBER 8, 2015
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF WILLIAM A. CURTRIGHT DOCKET NO. FAA-2015-1319 (Civil Penalty Action)
ORDER REASSIGNING PROCEEDING On September 5, 2015, Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwintransferred to the Food and Drug Administration. Accordingly, this proceeding is hereby reassigned from Judge Goodwin to Administrative Law Judge J.E. Sullivan. Any dates set for hearing orprehearing conference are suspended until further notice. All other orders remain infull force and effect absent further order. SO ORDERED.

Attachment-ServiceListSERVICE LIST - BYU.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal AviationAdministration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W1000 1

Dr. William Ames Curtright, Respondent P.O. Box 1350 Jefferson, OR97352 David F. Shayne, Complainant's Counsel Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 Federal AviationAdministration 1601 Lind Avenue S.W. Renton, W A 98057 TEL: 425-227-1847 FPC(: 425-227-1007 Judge J.E. Sullivan US. AdministrativeLawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-6941 FAX: 202-366-7536 ONE COPY DocketNo. FAA-2015-1319 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### -2-
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         795,837
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,155,705
<ALLOWANCES>                                   348,000
<INVENTORY>                                  7,884,701
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            17,225,880
<PP&E>                                      16,920,136
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,769,627
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,082,050
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,468,547
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        41,645
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,936,820
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                32,082,050
<SALES>                                     33,379,482
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            33,379,482
<CGS>                                       23,779,459
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               30,555,605
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                38,122
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             403,201
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,458,798
<INCOME-TAX>                                   983,519
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,475,279
<DISCONTINUED>                             (4,786,476)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,311,197)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.80)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.80)
                                           


</TABLE>
§ 1301.63 Senior agency official. ( a ) The Executive Order requires that each agency that originates or handles classified information designate a senior agency official to direct and administer its information security program. TVA's senior agency official is the Director, TVA Police & Emergency Management.
( b ) Questions with respect to the Information Security Program, particularly those concerning the classification, declassification, downgrading, and safeguarding of classified information, shall be directed to the Senior Agency Official.
[76 FR 39261, July 6, 2011, as amended at 83 FR 48373, Sept. 25, 2018]
#### § 1308.11 Contractor's request for relief.

Any request for relief which a Contractor believes is due under a contract shall be submitted to the Contracting Officer in writing, in accordance with the terms of the contract, including applicable time limits.
#### THE PEOPLE OF THE TERRITORY OF GUAM v. ALBERT SANCHEZ and DAVID SABLAN, Defendants

Criminal No. 127F-76

Superior Court of Guam

October 12, 1976

ABBATE, *Judge*

DECISION

The Defendants were indicted on June 25, 1976, by the Superior Court of Guam Territorial Grand Jury and charged with violation of Section 626.10(a)(1) of Guam Public Law 11-149 by virtue of acts done on or about October 29, 1975. Defendants in their motion to dismiss *348filed on July 15,1976, allege both pre-indictment delay and alteration of the indictment. This court finds no cause to dismiss on either .ground as there is no prima facie showing of prejudice here to Defendants’ rights to due process or a fair trial.

As to the alteration in the indictment, the case law is clear that a change in the date to correct a typographical or clerical error goes to form only and is not prejudicial. (See *Arnold v. U.S.,*C.A. 9th, 1964, 336 F.2d 347, 353, certiorari denied 85 S.Ct. 1348, 380 U.S. 982, 14 L.Ed.2d 275; *Berg v. U.S.,*C.A. 9th, 1949, 176 F.2d 122, 126). The indictment here was changed from October 1976 to October 1975 and initialed by the Assistant Attorney General who made the correction. In a very similar case decided by the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals the October 23, 1962, date was corrected to 1961, and the court stated “. . . This obvious clerical mistake was in no way prejudicial. As the 1962 date had not yet arrived, the intent of the indictment could not have misled anyone”. *(U.S. v. Zembito,*C.A. 4th, 1963, 315 F.2d 266, certiorari denied 83 S.Ct. 1524, 373 U.S. 924, 10 L.Ed.2d 423). Clearly this is harmless error under Rule 52(a) of the Rules of Criminal Procedure for the Superior Court of Guam.

As to the allegation of prejudicial pre-indictment delay, *U.S. v. Quinn,*C.A. 8th (July 27, 1976) expresses the appropriate standard:

> In determining whether a dismissal due to pretrial delay is proper, this court has balanced the reasonableness of the delay against the resulting prejudice to the defendant . . . applying this test we scrutinize the facts surrounding the delay and then determine whether the defendant has been substantially prejudiced . . .

The *Quinn*Court then cited *U.S. v. Jackson,*504 F.2d 337, n. 1, 16 Cr. L. 2020, which states at page 339 “. . . at *349least where the government is not engaging in intentional delay in order to gain a tactical advantage over the accused, the defendant must affirmatively demonstrate prejudice”.

As in *Quinn*undercover activity relating to other offenses might have been jeopardized had prosecutions been ■brought immediately after these defendants did the alleged acts. Accordingly, a delay of eight (8) months is not unreasonable and Defendants have failed to affirmatively demonstrate prejudice.

In accord with the foregoing, the motion to dismiss is hereby denied.

Submit order.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 3.1

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                     OF THE
                      RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                           CCPC HOLDING COMPANY, INC.
                                    * * * * *

      CCPC Holding Company, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and
by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the
"Corporation"), does hereby certify that:

      The amendment of the Corporation's Restated Certificate of Incorporation
      set forth in the following resolutions was approved by Unanimous Written
      Consent of the Board of Directors of the Corporation in accordance with
      the provisions of Section 242(b) (1) of the General Corporation Law of the
      State of Delaware and by Written Consent of the stockholders of the
      Corporation in accordance with the provisions of Section 228 of the
      General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware:


      RESOLVED, that the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Corporation be amended by striking the First Item of Article II in its entirety
and substituting therefor:

      FIRST:  The name of the Corporation is: WKI Holding Company, Inc.

      RESOLVED, FURTHER, that this Certificate of Amendment of the Restated
Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation shall be effective February 10,
2000.

      The undersigned, being the Secretary of the Corporation, does make this
Certificate, hereby declaring and certifying that the facts herein stated are
true; and accordingly has hereunto set his hand and seal this 31st day of July,
2000.


                                                       /s/ Raymond J. Kulla
                                                       -------------------------
                                                           By:  Raymond J. Kulla
                                                                       Secretary
p.1 

OAR Box 1672 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

DocumenLNumber: 

Docket Number: 

A-98-13 

Printed 9/30/2008 11:01:00 AM Sheet 46 of 132 
P.2 

A 98 13 

II-M 7 

From: 

To: 

Subject: 

Copies to: 

Date sent: 

Bill Allmond 

NACD 

Self <PES1 RTP/GLAFLAM> 

BILLNACD <BILLNACD@aol.com> 

Phone Call on 3/16 

STEVE SHEDD <SHEDD.STEVE@epamail.epa.gov> 

Fri, 13 Mar 1998 14:38:23 -0500 (EST) 

Bill: 

Steve Shedd said that Monday at 9:00 would be a good time to make the 

phone call about the liquids distribution rule. We will call you at 

that time. 

To answer your question about preparing for the call, we generally are 

investigating the role of blending and packaging operations (e.g., 

NACD members) in the greater liquids distribution industry. For 

example, do such operations exist separately or are they collocated 

with terminals or production facilities (or all ofthe above?)? Are 

they major sources of HAP emissions? How do they operate, and what 

are their emission characteristics? The list of questions I sent you 

is quite general, but those are some of the details that we need to 

find out about. 

Of course, we are still also interested in expanding our mailing list 

for the survey, and in locating one or more facilities to visit in 

order to collect additional information. 

I hope this helps you in understanding our focus in this specialty 

area of mixing/packaging. We'll talk to you Monday at 9:00. 

Regards, 

Greg LaFlam 

PES, Inc. 

Greg LaFlam „ 1 „ Mon, 13 Apr 1998 14:51:26
Order filed, March 26, 2013

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 13

- 00074

- CV

____________ JAMES NEZAT , Appellant

V.

TUCKER ENERGY SERVIC ES, INC. , Appellee

On Appeal from the 270th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2009

- 44349



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due March 4, 2013

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record.
The record has not been filed with the court. Becau se the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Judith Kulhanek , the substitute court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order

. PER CURIAM
Exhibit 23.1

 

 

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.33-77300, 33-80155, and 333-94555 on Forms S-8 and No. 33-96766 on Form S-3of SangStat  Medical Corporation of our report dated February 15, 2000(March 30, 2000 as to Note 16), appearing in this Annual Report on Form10-K of SangStat Medical Corporation for the year endedDecember 31, 1999.

 

 

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
San Jose, California
April 12, 2000