alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 3a.41 Access requirements. ( a ) The Personnel Security Officer, on a continuing current basis, will certify to the Security Officer, the head of each bureau and office and each regional engineer, the names of officers and employees who have been granted a security clearance for access to classified material and the level of such clearance (Top Secret, Secret, Confidential). The Personnel Security Officer will maintain accurate and current listings of personnel who have been granted security clearances in accordance with the standards and criteria of Executive Orders 10450 and 10865 and as prescribed by this part.
( b ) In addition to a security clearance, staff members must have a need for access to classified information or material in connection with the performance of duties. The determination for the need-to-know will be made by the official having responsibility for the classified information or material.
( c ) When a staff member no longer requires access to classified information or material in connection with performance of official duties, the Personnel Security Officer will administratively withdraw the security clearance. Additionally, when a staff member no longer needs access to a particular security classification category, the security clearance will be adjusted to the classification category required. In both cases, this action will be without prejudice to the staff member's eligibility for a security clearance or upgrading of category should the need again arise.
( d ) Access to classified information or material originated by the FERC may be authorized to persons outside the Executive Branch of the Government engaged in historical research and to former Presidential appointees as provided in paragraphs VI B and C of the NSC directive dated May 17, 1972. The determination of access authorization will be made by the Chairman.
( e ) Except as otherwise provided in section 102 of the National Security Act of 1947, 61 Stat. 495, 50 U.S.C. 403, classified information or material originating in one department or agency shall not be disseminated outside any other department or agency to which it has been made available without the consent of the originating organization.
[Order 470, 38 FR 5161, Feb. 26, 1973, as amended by Order 756, 77 FR 4893, Feb. 1, 2012]
**New York State Office of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Services (OASAS)**

**NYSBIRTI (TI023470)**

**Program Description**

The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT) awarded the New York State Office of the Governor $1.66 million per year for 5 years to support the delivery of screening, brief intervention, extended brief interview, and referral to substance use/abuse treatment services in New York City (NYC) STD Clinics and in two hospital emergency departments and a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) in Watertown serving the military community near Fort Drum.

**Program Model**

· **Screening:**Pre-screening is administered by health care interventionists using standardized prescreening questions (AUDIT-C and DAST-1). Individuals with positive pre-screens undergo full screening with the AUDIT, DAST-10, and PHQ-2.

· **Brief Intervention:**Brief interventions are conducted in-person using motivational interviewing by interventionists. Brief interventions consist of one session.

· **Extended Brief Interventions (Brief Treatment):**Interventionists and health coaches can provide up to 12 sessions of extended brief interventions. Protocols are based on the Motivational Interviewing to enhance behavior change.

· **Referral:**For patients that are willing to consider treatment, interventionists and behavioral health counselors make a referral to local treatment providers.

**Service Features**

All patients receive referral to services relating to health, HIV testing and education, mental health, family counseling, violence, housing, food, dental care, education and vocational rehabilitation, child care, financial planning, and legal issues. 

**SBIRT Services Integrated**

SBIRT services are offered in all eight STD clinics in NYC. In Watertown, there are two hospital emergency rooms and an FQHC. Partners include:

· New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH) Bureau of Sexually Transmitted Disease Control 

· Jefferson County Community Services Board

**Contact Information**

John Yu, Ph.D., Project DirectorNYS OASAS1450 Western Avenue

Albany, NY 12203 

518-457-0053

John.yu@oasas.ny.gov

Or visit http://www.oasas.ny.gov/hps/research/Projects.cfm
# C_2010209EN.01002701.xml

| 31.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/27

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Roma (Italy), made on 23 March 2010 — Criminal proceedings against Alessandro Sacchi

(Case C-255/10)

()

2010/C 209/38

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale di Roma

Party to the main proceedings

Party to the main proceedings

Alessandro Sacchi

Question referred

Question referred

What interpretation is to be given to Articles 43 EC and 49 EC with reference to freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services in the sector of betting on sports events, regard being had also to the principle of effective judicial protection, in order to establish whether or not those Treaty provisions permit national rules establishing a State monopoly and a system of licences and authorisations which, within the context of a given number of licences,: (a) tend generally to protect holders of licences issued at an earlier period on the basis of a procedure that unlawfully excluded certain operators; (b) ensure the de facto maintenance of commercial positions acquired at the conclusion of a procedure that unlawfully excluded certain operators (by, for example, prohibiting new licensees from locating their betting outlets within a specified distance from those already in existence); (c) lay down cases in which the licence may lapse, with forfeiture of large guarantee deposits, including the case in which the licensee directly or indirectly carries on cross-border gaming activities analogous to those under the licence?

---
#### § 701.208 WRC petition for judicial extension of time.

The provisions of § 701.206 notwithstanding, the Director may petition for judicial extension of time when exceptional circumstances warrant such action.
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

 

STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT 

USDA Seeks Applications for New Rural Business Investment Companies

(November 18, 2016) – United States Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Rural Development Under 

Secretary Lisa Mensah today announced that USDA is seeking applications for investment companies to 

become new Rural Business Investment Companies (RBIC) under the department’s non-leveraged Rural 

Business Investment Program (RBIP).

Under this program, USDA certifies venture capital funds, which provide an investment of equity capital that 

helps to promote economic development and job creation in rural areas. 

There are several advantages to becoming a non-leveraged RBIC. For example, RBICs are the only method a 

Farm Credit System bank can be part of a venture capital fund. Also, RBIC funds are solely regulated through 

USDA. Another advantage is that RBICs are considered a public welfare investment, allowing banks to take 

advantage of Community Reinvestment Act Credits, which encourages investment in small rural companies 

seeking to expand. 

USDA Rural Development is accepting applications for non-leveraged RBICs on an ongoing basis and until 

such time the agency determines otherwise. 

For additional details about RBIC and how to apply for non-leveraged status, see Page 81724 of the November 

18, 2016 Federal Register. 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender.
§ 590.905 Importation of restricted eggs. ( a ) No containers of restricted eggs other than checks or dirties will be imported into the United States. The shipping containers of such eggs shall be identified with the name, address, and country of origin of the exporter, and the date of pack and the quality of the eggs (e.g., checks or dirties) preceded by the word “Imported” or the statement “Imported Restricted Eggs—For Processing Only In An Official USDA Plant,” or “Restricted Eggs—Not To Be Used As Human Food.” Such identification shall be legible and conspicuous.
( b ) For properly sealed and certified shipments of shell eggs for breaking at an official egg products plant, the containers need not be labeled, provided that the shipment is segregated and controlled upon arrival at the destination breaking plant.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Bakemia McVay, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 750]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Carruthers, J.), rendered on or about September 29, 2003, unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Order filed. Concur—Tom, J.E, Andrias, Saxe, Marlow and Nardelli, JJ.
IT CAN BE HARD TO GET 

HIS ATTENTION. 

While you’re dropping off your child, discuss a plan to help 

him avoid alcohol and other drugs.

Talk with your child about what to do if he or she is faced with a decision about 

alcohol and other drugs, such as texting a code word to a family member or 

practicing how to say “no thanks” in a safe environment. For tips on how—and 

when—to begin the conversation, visit:

www.underagedrinking.samhsa.gov

IT CAN BE HARD TO GET 

HIS ATTENTION. 

While you’re dropping off your child, discuss a plan to help 

him avoid alcohol and other drugs.

Talk with your children about what to do if they are faced with a decision about 

alcohol and other drugs, such as texting a code word to a family member. Practice 

the exit plan in a safe environment. For tips on how—and when—to begin the 

conversation, visit:

www.underagedrinking.samhsa.gov

SMA-18-5086
#### § 33.10 Additional information.

The Director of the Office of Energy Market Regulation, or his designee, may, by letter, require the applicant to submit additional information as is needed for analysis of an application filed under this part.

[Order 642, 65 FR 71014, Nov. 28, 2000, as amended by Order 699, 72 FR 45324, Aug. 14, 2007; Order 701, 72 FR 61053, Oct. 29, 2007]
<PAGE>
                               RATIO OF EARNINGS
                                TO FIXED CHARGES
 
                                  EXHIBIT 12.1
 
                                       56
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1
 
                        REPUBLIC ENGINEERED STEELS, INC.
                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
        FOR FISCAL YEARS ENDING JUNE 30, 1993, 1994, 1995 1996 AND 1997
                             (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                FISCAL      FISCAL     FISCAL     FISCAL     FISCAL
                                                                 1993        1994       1995       1996       1997
                                                              -----------  ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
<S>                                                           <C>          <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES..........................          --          --         --         --         --
COVERAGE DEFICIENCY.........................................   $   8,772   $  27,602  $   7,212  $  55,566  $  56,888
</TABLE>
 
Note:  For the purposes of calculating the ratio of earnings to the fixed
charges, earnings represent earnings (losses) before income taxes, extraordinary
gain and cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles plus fixed
charges. Fixed charges consist of net interest expense, amortization of discount
and deferred financing costs and the portion of rental expense which management
believes is representative of the interest component of rent expense. If
earnings were adjusted to eliminate non-cash ESOP charges, the ratio of
earnings, as adjusted, to fixed charges would have been 1.62x, 1.19x, 2.85x,
(0.21)x and 0.07x, respectively.
 
                                       57
§ 385.1101 Applicability (Rule 1101). ( a ) *Proceedings to which applicable.* Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, this subpart applies to proceedings of the Commission held in accordance with section 502(c) of the NGPA to provide for adjustments of: ( 1 ) Commission rules, and
( 2 ) Commission orders having the applicability and effect of a rule as defined in section 551(4) of title 5 of the United States Code (5 U.S.C. 551(4)) and issued under the NGPA, except orders issued under sections 301, 302, and 303 of the NGPA.
( b ) This subpart does not apply to: ( 1 ) Proceedings wherein the Commission by order grants an adjustment on its own motion or;
( 2 ) Proceedings for which the Commission by order waives the provision of this subpart.
( c ) *Relationship to other rules.* ( 1 ) Where a provision of this subpart is inconsistent with a provision in another subpart of this part, the former provision controls.
( 2 ) When provisions of other subparts of this part require Commission action, such provisions as applied under this subpart shall be deemed to require staff action. This subpart does not require a hearing to which subpart E applies.
[Order 225, 47 FR 19022, May 3, 1982, as amended by Order 478, 52 FR 28467, July 30, 1987]
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**SUBSECTIONS(a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITEDSTATES CODE**

 

Pursuant tosection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) ofsection 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersignedofficers of Corgenix Medical Corporation, a Nevada corporation (the “Company”),does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-QSBfor the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities anExchange Commission (the “10-QSB Report”) that:

 

i.      the 10-QSB Report fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

ii.   the information contained in the10-QSB Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated:    February 11, 2008

 

**ThisCertification is made solely for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any otherpurpose.**

 

**Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to the Company and will be retained by theCompany and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request. This written statement shall not be deemed to be “filed” as partof the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB that it accompanies.**

 
| /s/ Douglass T. Simpson                            |
|----------------------------------------------------|
| President and Chief  Executive Officer             |
|                                               |
| /s/ William H.  Critchfield                        |
| Senior Vice President  and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.29
Summary of Director Compensation
Set forth below is a summary of the compensation paid by SunEdison Semiconductor Limited (the “Company”) to its outside directors who are not employees of the Company. Directors that are also employees of the Company receive no additional compensation for their service as a director. 


Cash Compensation
		
	•
	$50,000 annual board of directors cash retainer; 


		
	•
	$50,000 additional cash retainer for the chairman of the board of directors; 


		
	•
	$20,000 additional cash retainer for the chairman of the Audit Committee and $7,500 additional cash retainer for each member of the Audit Committee; and 


		
	•
	$12,500 additional cash retainer for the chairman of the Compensation Committee and $5,000 additional cash retainer for each member of the Compensation Committee. 


Notwithstanding, the fees paid to Mr. Antonio Alvarez, who also serves on SunEdison’s board of directors, for serving as a chair or member of the Company’s board and any committee of the Company’s board were reduced by 50% for so long as SunEdison owned more than 50% of the Company’s ordinary shares. Effective January 20, 2015, SunEdison no longer owned more than 50% of the Company’s ordinary shares and Mr. Alvarez’s fees were no longer reduced after that date.


Equity Compensation
Our independent directors, other than Mr. Abdul Jabbar Bin Karam Din, who is a partner at Rajah & Tann, our Singapore law firm, will be awarded restricted stock units (“RSUs”) for ordinary shares on an annual basis (as of the date of the annual general meeting of shareholders each year) in connection with their board service. Each year, RSUs are to be awarded in an amount such that the number of underlying ordinary shares has a total value of $150,000 on the date the award is granted (rounded to the nearest 100 ordinary shares), which vest on the first anniversary of the grant date. For newly elected or appointed independent directors that become directors on a date other than the date of the annual general meeting of shareholders, such directors receive RSUs for a pro rata portion of the $150,000 total value. For our non-employee directors that are also directors of SunEdison, the annual grant will be reduced by 50% for so long as SunEdison owns more than 50% of our ordinary shares (i.e. such directors will receive an annual grant of $75,000 in RSU grant value). 
The RSU grants to Mr. Antonio Alvarez, who also serves on SunEdison’s board of directors, for serving as a member of the Company’s board were reduced by 50% for so long as SunEdison owned more than 50% of the Company’s ordinary shares. Effective January 20, 2015, SunEdison no longer owned more than 50% of the Company’s ordinary shares and Mr. Alvarez’s grants were no longer reduced after that date.
        
Reimbursable Expenses 
All reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by a director for attending Board or Committee meetings are reimbursed by the Company.
#### In the Matter of Richard Winkler, Appellant, v New York State Department of Correctional Services, Respondent.

[825 NYS2d 290]

Mercure, J.P.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Teresi, J.), entered January 26, 2006 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CFLR article 78, to review a determination of the Central Office Review Committee denying his grievance.

Fetitioner, a prison inmate, commenced this CFLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination of the Central Office Review Committee (hereinafter CORC) which, among other things, denied his grievance challenging his termination from *994the Chemical Dependency/Domestic Violence (hereinafter CDDV) program. Supreme Court dismissed the petition and this appeal ensued.

In order for petitioner to prevail, it is incumbent upon him to demonstrate that CORC’s determination was irrational or arbitrary and capricious *(see Matter of Matos v Goord,*27 AD3d 940, 941 [2006]; *Matter of Harty v Goord,*3 AD3d 701, 702 [2004]). With respect to the issue concerning his termination from the CDDV program, petitioner has failed to make the necessary showing. Instead, the record reveals that petitioner received unsatisfactory monthly CDDV program evaluations in January and February 2005. The failing evaluations made reference to and were based upon, among other factors, petitioner’s denial, negative behavior, noncompliance with the therapeutic community and violation of the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting the possession of contraband. Accordingly, we conclude that CORC’s determination regarding petitioner’s termination from the CDDV program was rationally based.

Each of the remaining contentions advanced by petitioner in his pro se brief has been considered and found to be either moot or unavailing.

Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
#### § 367.1850 Account 185, Temporary facilities.

This account must include amounts shown by project for property installed for temporary use for a period of less than one year. Each project must be charged with the cost of temporary facilities and credited with payments received from customers and net salvage realized on removal of the temporary facilities. Any net credit or debit resulting must be cleared to the construction or service project to which the facilities relate.
§ 5.9 Comments and information or study requests. ( a ) *Comments and study requests.* Comments on the pre-application document and the Commission staff's Scoping Document 1 must be filed with the Commission within 60 days following the Commission's notice of consultation procedures issued pursuant to § 5.8. Comments, including those by Commission staff, must be accompanied by any information gathering and study requests, and should include information and studies needed for consultation under section 7 of the Endangered Species Act and water quality certification under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act.
( b ) *Content of study request.* Any information or study request must: ( 1 ) Describe the goals and objectives of each study proposal and the information to be obtained;
( 2 ) If applicable, explain the relevant resource management goals of the agencies or Indian tribes with jurisdiction over the resource to be studied;
( 3 ) If the requester is not a resource agency, explain any relevant public interest considerations in regard to the proposed study;
( 4 ) Describe existing information concerning the subject of the study proposal, and the need for additional information;
( 5 ) Explain any nexus between project operations and effects (direct, indirect, and/or cumulative) on the resource to be studied, and how the study results would inform the development of license requirements;
( 6 ) Explain how any proposed study methodology (including any preferred data collection and analysis techniques, or objectively quantified information, and a schedule including appropriate field season(s) and the duration) is consistent with generally accepted practice in the scientific community or, as appropriate, considers relevant tribal values and knowledge; and
( 7 ) Describe considerations of level of effort and cost, as applicable, and why any proposed alternative studies would not be sufficient to meet the stated information needs.
( c ) *Applicant seeking PURPA benefits; estimate of fees.* If a potential applicant has stated that it intends to seek PURPA benefits, comments on the pre-application document by a fish and wildlife agency must provide the potential applicant with a reasonable estimate of the total costs the agency anticipates it will incur in order to set mandatory terms and conditions for the proposed project. An agency may provide a potential applicant with an updated estimate as it deems necessary. If any agency believes that its most recent estimate will be exceeded by more than 25 percent, it must supply the potential applicant with a new estimate and submit a copy to the Commission.
[Order 2002, 68 FR 51121, Aug. 25, 2003; 68 FR 61742, Oct. 30, 2003; 68 FR 69957, Dec. 16, 2003, as amended by Order 699, 72 FR 45324, Aug. 14, 2007]