alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 0
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 0 appear at 73 FR 73 FR 54947, Sept. 24, 2008.

§ 0.70 General functions. The following functions are assigned to and shall be conducted, handled, or supervised by, the Assistant Attorney General, Tax Division: ( a ) Prosecution and defense in all courts, other than the Tax Court, of civil suits, and the handling of other matters, arising under the internal revenue laws, and litigation resulting from the taxing provisions of other Federal statutes (except civil forfeiture and civil penalty matters arising under laws relating to liquor, narcotics, gambling, and firearms assigned to the Criminal Division by § 0.55(d)).
( b ) Criminal proceedings arising under the internal revenue laws, except the following: Proceedings pertaining to misconduct of Internal Revenue Service personnel, to taxes on liquor, narcotics, firearms, coin-operated gambling and amusement machines, and to wagering, forcible rescue of seized property (26 U.S.C. 7212(b)), corrupt or forcible interference with an officer or employee acting under the Internal Revenue laws (26 U.S.C. 7212(a)), unauthorized disclosure of information (26 U.S.C. 7213), and counterfeiting, mutilation, removal, or reuse of stamps (26 U.S.C. 7208).
( c ) ( 1 ) Enforcement of tax liens, and mandamus, injunctions, and other special actions or general matters arising in connection with internal revenue matters.
( 2 ) Defense of actions arising under section 2410 of title 28 of the U.S. Code whenever the United States is named as a party to an action as the result of the existence of a Federal tax lien, including the defense of other actions arising under section 2410, if any, involving the same property whenever a tax-lien action is pending under that section.
( d ) Appellate proceedings in connection with civil and criminal cases enumerated in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section and in § 0.71, including petitions to review decisions of the Tax Court of the United States.
[Order No. 423-69, 34 FR 20388, Dec. 31, 1969, as amended by Order No. 445-70, 35 FR 19397, Dec. 23, 1970; Order No. 699-77, 42 FR 15315, Mar. 21, 1977; Order No. 960-81, 46 FR 52346, Oct. 27, 1981]
Exhibit 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Paul G.  Lego,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that the Quarterly
Report of Virage,  Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal  quarter ended June 30, 2003
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information  contained in such Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material  respects the financial  condition and
results of operations of Virage, Inc.


Date:    August 7, 2003                 By:   /s/ Paul G. Lego
     ------------------------------        -------------------------------------
                                           Paul G. Lego
                                           President & Chief Executive Officer


I, Scott Gawel, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Virage,  Inc.  on Form 10-Q for the fiscal  quarter  ended  June 30,  2003 fully
complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information  contained in such Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material  respects the financial  condition and
results of operations of Virage, Inc.

Date:    August 7, 2003                 By:   /s/ Scott Gawel
     ------------------------------        -------------------------------------
                                           Scott Gawel
                                           Vice President, Finance &
                                           Acting Chief Financial Officer

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Virage,  Inc. and will be retained by Virage,  Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 1308.24 Undue delay in Contracting Officer's decision. ( a ) If there is an undue delay by a Contracting Officer in issuing a decision on a claim, the Contractor may request the Chairman to direct the Contracting Officer to issue a decision within a specified period of time.
( b ) A request under this section shall: ( 1 ) Be in writing;
( 2 ) State the date on which the claim was submitted to the Contracting Officer.
( 3 ) State the date suggested for issuance of a decision by the Contracting Officer.
( c ) TVA may reply to a motion under this section within 5 days after its receipt.
( d ) The Chairman shall issue a written decision on the request. If granted, the decision shall specify the date by which the Contracting Officer's decision is to be rendered, and a copy shall be served on the Contracting Officer.
# C_2011186EN.01001201.xml

| 25.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 186/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 186/12

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria), lodged on 21 March 2011 — Compass-Datenbank GmbH v Republik Österreich

(Case C-138/11)

2011/C 186/20

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Compass-Datenbank GmbH

Appellant:

Respondent: Republik Österreich

Respondent:

Interested parties: Bundeskartellanwalt, Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde

Interested parties:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Is Article 102 TFEU to be interpreted as meaning that a public authority acts as an undertaking if it stores in a database (business undertakings register) the information reported by undertakings on the basis of statutory reporting obligations and allows inspection and/or printouts to be made in return for payment, but prohibits any more extensive use?
  If the reply to Question 1 is in the negative: |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is Article 102 TFEU to be interpreted as meaning that a public authority acts as an undertaking if it stores in a database (business undertakings register) the information reported by undertakings on the basis of statutory reporting obligations and allows inspection and/or printouts to be made in return for payment, but prohibits any more extensive use?

If the reply to Question 1 is in the negative:

| 2. | Does a public authority act as an undertaking in the case where, in reliance on its sui generis right to protection as the producer of a database, it prohibits uses which go beyond that of allowing inspection and the creation of printouts?
  If the reply to Questions 1 or 2 is in the affirmative: |
| --- | --- |

2.

Does a public authority act as an undertaking in the case where, in reliance on its sui generis right to protection as the producer of a database, it prohibits uses which go beyond that of allowing inspection and the creation of printouts?

sui generis

If the reply to Questions 1 or 2 is in the affirmative:

| 3. | Is Article 102 TFEU to be interpreted as meaning that the principles laid down in the judgments in Joined Cases C-241/91 P and C-242/91 P RTE and ITP [1995] ECR I-743 and in Case C-418/01 IMS Health [2004] ECR I-5039 (‘essential facilities doctrine’) are also to be applied if there is no ‘upstream market’ because the protected data are collected and stored in a database (business undertakings register) in the course of a public-authority activity? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Is Article 102 TFEU to be interpreted as meaning that the principles laid down in the judgments in Joined Cases C-241/91 P and C-242/91 P RTE and ITP [1995] ECR I-743 and in Case C-418/01 IMS Health [2004] ECR I-5039 (‘essential facilities doctrine’) are also to be applied if there is no ‘upstream market’ because the protected data are collected and stored in a database (business undertakings register) in the course of a public-authority activity?

RTE and ITP

IMS Health

---
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Feather Valley  Financial,
Ltd., on Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "REPORT"),  the
undersigned,  Raul Castro,  Chief  Executive  Officer and  Principal  Accounting
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ Raul Castro
Raul Castro
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Appendix A .1

VISTAS MOU



# (signed c opy)

Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation

Division of Air Pollution Control

9 th Floor L&C Annex

401 Church Street

Nashville, TN 37243
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FOR
THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          27,551
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,156
<ALLOWANCES>                                       600
<INVENTORY>                                     10,326
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                52,953
<PP&E>                                          43,927
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,811
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  83,673
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,236
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        30,309
<OTHER-SE>                                      46,833
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    83,673
<SALES>                                        144,560
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               144,560
<CGS>                                          122,195
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  122,195
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,394
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,504
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,672
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,832
<DISCONTINUED>                                     157
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,675
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .89
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .87
        

</TABLE>
National Cancer Institute

u.s. Department 

of health and

human services National Institutes

of Health

Managing Radiation Therapy Side Effects

What to do about changes when 

you urinate

About urination changes

Radiation therapy can irritate the 

bladder and urinary tract. The 

discomfort usually goes away a few 

weeks after treatment is finished. 

Call your doctor or nurse if you 

have a fever of 100.5° F (38° C) 

or higher.

Tell your doctor or nurse if you 

have any of these changes: n Pain, cramps, or a burning feeling 

when you urinate

n A reddish color or blood in your urine n Trouble starting to urinate n Trouble getting all the urine out n A feeling that you have to urinate 

right away

n Leaking a little urine when you 

sneeze or cough

Learn about drinks that 

can help.

Drink more liquids. n Drink lots of liquids each day. Drink 

enough so that your urine is clear to 

light yellow in color.

n Water, cranberry juice, gelatin, and 

most soups are all good choices. 

n Keep track of how much you drink. 

Talk with your doctor or nurse to 

make sure you are drinking enough 

each day.

“A few weeks into radiation therapy, it 

hurt when I urinated. My doctor told me 

to drink more water. He also told me 

about medicine that could help.”
Managing Radiation Therapy Side Effects: Changes when you urinate

Ask about drinks or foods that you 

may need to avoid.

Some things can make these problems worse. 

Your doctor or nurse may suggest that you 

limit or don’t have:

n Drinks with alcohol 

(such as beer, wine, and liquor)

n Drinks with caffeine 

(such as coffee and black tea)

n Drinks that are carbonated 

(such as sodas and colas)

n Spicy foods 

n Tobacco products

Questions to ask your doctor 

or nurse:

1. What changes am I likely to have?

2. What problems should I call you about?

3. How long might these problems last?

4. Are there medicines, exercises, or other steps I can 

take to feel better?

5. How much liquid should I drink each day?

6. Are there any drinks or foods that I should avoid?

NIH Publication No. 11-6110

Revised December 2010

How can we help?

National Cancer Institute’s Cancer Information Service

Phone: 1-800-422-6237 (1-800-4-CANCER)

Web: www.cancer.gov

Online Chat: www.cancer.gov/livehelp

NCI has a series of 9 Radiation Therapy Side Effects Fact Sheets at:

www.cancer.gov/radiation-side-effects
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 806 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 806

  To prohibit the collection of data or information generated on the 
                               internet.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 14, 2019

  Mr. Kennedy introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit the collection of data or information generated on the 
                               internet.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Own Your Own Data Act''.

SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF PERSONAL INFORMATION GENERATED ON INTERNET.

    (a) In General.--Each individual owns and has an exclusive property 
right in the data that an individual generates on the internet under 
section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 45).
    (b) Social Media Companies.--
            (1) In general.--Each social media company shall--
                    (A) have a prominently and conspicuously displayed 
                icon each user may click to obtain a copy of the user's 
                data with any analysis of the user's data performed by 
                the social media company;
                    (B) have a prominently and conspicuously displayed 
                icon each user may click to easily export the user's 
                data with any analysis of the user's data performed by 
                the social media company;
                    (C) require that each user, during the registration 
                of an account, knowingly and willfully enter into a 
                licensing agreement--
                            (i) that uses plain language that a 
                        reasonable person of average intelligence can 
                        understand the first time the person reads or 
                        hears the licensing agreement;
                            (ii) in which the user agrees to license 
                        the user's data to the social media company; 
                        and
                            (iii) that is no longer than 500 words, 
                        using a measure of 6 characters to a word; and
                    (D) have an icon each user may click to cancel 
                immediately the license agreement.
            (2) Regulations.--The Federal Trade Commission shall 
        promulgate regulations carrying out this subsection, which 
        shall be approved by Congress.
    (c) Enforcement.--The Federal Trade Commission shall enforce the 
provisions of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2013245EN.01000202.xml

| 24.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 245/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 245/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 July 2013 — European Commission v Italian Republic

(Case C-312/11) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2000/78/EC - Article 5 - Establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation - Persons with disabilities - Insufficient implementing measures)

2013/C 245/03

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: J. Enegren and C. Cattabriga, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, acting as Agent, assisted by C. Gerardis, avvocato dello Stato)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to take, within the prescribed period, all the provisions necessary to comply with Article 5 of Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation (OJ 2000 L 303, p. 16) — National legislation providing for the application of that article through various measures, the application of which is itself dependent on the currently purely theoretical adoption of further measures — Insufficient guarantees and adjustments

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by not introducing a requirement for all employers to make reasonable adjustments, where needed in a particular case, for all persons with disabilities, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligation to ensure the correct and full implementation of Article 5 of Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by not introducing a requirement for all employers to make reasonable adjustments, where needed in a particular case, for all persons with disabilities, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligation to ensure the correct and full implementation of Article 5 of Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation;

| 2. | Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 226, 30.7.2011.

1

---
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-83442) pertaining to the Hugoton Energy Corporation 1993 Stock
Option Plan, Hugoton Energy Corporation 1993 Nonemployee Directors Stock Option
Plan, John T. McNabb, II Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreement, and David S.
Elkouri Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreement of our report dated February 7,
1997, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
Hugoton Energy Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended December 31, 1996.
 
     We also consent to the incorporation by reference in (1) the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-97092) pertaining to the 1995 Stock Option Plan of
Hugoton Energy Corporation, (2) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
33-83440) pertaining to the Hugoton Energy Corporation 401(k) Profit Sharing
Plan and (3) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-15095) pertaining to
the Hugoton Energy Corporation Amended and Restated 1993 Nonemployee Directors
Stock Option Plan and the Jay W. Decker Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreement of
our report dated February 7, 1997, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of Hugoton Energy Corporation included in the Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1996.
 
                                        ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
Wichita, Kansas
February 20, 1997
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Viasystems Group, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”) filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Gerald G. Sax, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Gerald G. Sax


Gerald G. Sax


Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Financial Officer)


August 9, 2010
#### § 1b.12 Transcripts.

Transcripts, if any, of investigative testimony shall be recorded solely by the official reporter, or by any other person or means designated by the investigating officer. A witness who has given testimony in an investigation shall be entitled, upon written request, to procure a transcript of the witness' own testimony on payment of the appropriate fees, except that in a non-public formal investigation, the office responsible for the investigation may for good cause deny such request. In any event, any witness or his counsel, upon proper identification, shall have the right to inspect the official transcript of the witness' own testimony.

[43 FR 27174, June 23, 1978, as amended by Order 225, 47 FR 19054, May 3, 1982; Order 756, 77 FR 4893, Feb. 1, 2012]