alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
EXHIBIT 27.8:  RESTATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
This schedule contains financial information extracted from the Company's May
31, 1996 Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0000016918
<NAME> CANANDAIGUA BRANDS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1996
<CASH>                                           2,623
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  150,326
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    312,403
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               486,121
<PP&E>                                         346,202
<DEPRECIATION>                                  93,023
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,023,027
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          271,037
<BONDS>                                        317,455
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           214
<OTHER-SE>                                     363,756
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,023,027
<SALES>                                        276,493
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               276,493
<CGS>                                          203,586
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  203,586
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,795
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,169
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,668
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,501
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,501
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.43
        


</TABLE>
### §3209. Reports respecting standards

#### (a) State authorities and nonregulated utilities

Not later than 1 year after November 9, 1978, and annually thereafter for 10 years, each State regulatory authority (with respect to each gas utility for which it has ratemaking authority), and each nonregulated gas utility, shall report to the Secretary, in such manner as the Secretary shall prescribe, respecting its consideration of the standards established by this chapter. Such report shall include a summary of the determinations made and actions taken with respect to each of such standards on a utility-by-utility basis.

#### (b) Secretary

Not later than 18 months after November 9, 1978, and annually thereafter for 10 years, the Secretary shall submit a report to the President and the Congress containing—

(1) a summary of the reports submitted under subsection (a),

(2) his analysis of such reports, and

(3) his actions under this chapter, and his recommendations for such further Federal actions, including any legislation, regarding retail gas utility rates (and other practices) as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 95–617, title III, §309, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3153.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definitions

The definition of Secretary in section 2602 of Title 16, Conservation, applies to this section.
#### § 341.5 Cancellation of tariffs.

Carriers must cancel tariffs when the service or transportation movement is terminated. If the service in connection with the tariff is no longer in interstate commerce, the tariff publication must so state. Carrier must file such cancellations within 30 days of the termination of service.

[Order 780, 78 FR 32098, May 29, 2013]
When something is going on with a 

student, it can be hard to get the full 

picture. You don’t have to do it alone.

Student assistance professionals are there to help when you 

have concerns about a student. They will work with you, the 

student, and the student’s family to develop a complete picture 

of what’s going on and engage resources to help.

www.underagedrinking.samhsa.gov

#TalkTheyHearYou PEP20-03-01-069
Exhibit 10.4


 





AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
AGREEMENT


 


This Amendment No. 2 to the Employment Services
Agreement (this “Amendment”), is entered into as of March 4, 2016, by and between Li3 Energy, Inc., a Nevada corporation
(the “Company”), and Luis Santillana (the “Executive” and, together with the Company, “the Parties”). 


 


WITNESSETH:


 


WHEREAS, the Company and Executive
entered into an Employment Services Agreement dated as of December 1, 2011, as amended on April 8, 2015, by that certain Amendment
No.1 to the Employment Services Agreement (hereinafter the “Employment Agreement”); and


 


WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend
the Employment Agreement.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereto
agree to amend the Employment Agreement as follows, effective as of the date hereof:


 


1. Section 1 shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced
with the following:


 


“Employment Period. The term
of the Executive’s employment by the Company pursuant to this Agreement (the “Employment Period”) shall
continue until March 31, 2016 (the “Termination Date”). At the end of the Employment Period, this Agreement
shall terminate unless renewed at the sole discretion of the Chairman of the Board for an additional three month period.”


 


2. Section 3 shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced
with the following:


 


“From January 1, 2016 until March
31, 2016, Executive shall be paid a Base Salary equal to $ 3,140.00 per month, payable to Executive in shares of Common Stock of
the Company. The number of shares payable to Executive shall be calculated based on the average closing price of the Common Stock
for the thirty days prior to, and including the Termination Date.”   


 


3. Section 6(a) shall be amended by deleting “other than
with respect to any such voluntary termination pursuant to Section 6(e) hereof” from the second sentence of the section.


 


4. Section 6(e) shall be deleted in its entirety.


 


5. The Parties hereby agree that, except as specifically provided
in and modified by this Amendment, the Employment Agreement is in all other respects hereby ratified and confirmed and references
to the Employment Agreement shall be deemed to refer to the Employment Agreement as modified by this Amendment.


 


[Signature page follows]


 




     


     


    

 





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned
have executed this Amendment as of the day and year first written above.


 


	 	LI3 ENERGY, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By:     	/s/ Luis Saenz
	 	 	Name: Luis Saenz
	 	 	Title: CEO
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	EXECUTIVE
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	/s/ Luis Santillana
	 	Luis Santillana
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

November 15, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00416

- CV

VILT AND ASSOCIATES, P.C . and Mediation Centers of America, L.L.C.

, Appellant s

v.

Ho Kon PARKER and Richard T. Parker,

Appellee s

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- CI

- 19561 Honorable Rosie Alvarado, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

By order dated October 14, 2019, we concluded we had jurisdiction over this appeal as a timely

- filed restricted appeal and ordered appellant s to file an amended brief framing their issues under the legal standards applicable to restricted appeals by November 13, 2019. On November 8, 2019, appellees filed a response which appears to question our jurisdiction or alternatively to request an exten sion of time to file an appellees’ brief. On November 13, 2019, appellants filed their amended brief.

Appellee’s brief must be filed no later than December 13, 2019. Appellees may raise any additional challenges to this court’s jurisdiction in their b rief

.

_____________________ ____________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 15th day of November, 2019

.

______________________ _____________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
#### § 388.101 Scope.

This part prescribes the rules governing public notice of proceedings, publication of decisions, requests for informal advice from Commission staff, procedures for press, television, radio and photographic coverage, requests for Commission records, requests for confidential treatment of documents submitted to the Commission, procedures for responding to subpoenas seeking documents or testimony from Commission employees or former employees, fees for various requests for documents, and requests for reduction or waiver of these fees.
### §2952. International discussions

#### (a) Global change research

The President should direct the Secretary of State, in cooperation with the Committee, to initiate discussions with other nations leading toward international protocols and other agreements to coordinate global change research activities. Such discussions should include the following issues:

(1) Allocation of costs in global change research programs, especially with respect to major capital projects.

(2) Coordination of global change research plans with those developed by international organizations such as the International Council on Scientific Unions, the World Meteorological Organization, and the United Nations Environment Program.

(3) Establishment of global change research centers and training programs for scientists, especially those from developing nations.

(4) Development of innovative methods for management of international global change research, including—

(A) use of new or existing intergovernmental organizations for the coordination or funding of global change research; and

(B) creation of a limited foundation for global change research.

(5) The prompt establishment of international projects to—

(A) create globally accessible formats for data collected by various international sources; and

(B) combine and interpret data from various sources to produce information readily usable by policymakers attempting to formulate effective strategies for preventing, mitigating, and adapting to possible adverse effects of global change.

(6) Establishment of international offices to disseminate information useful in identifying, preventing, mitigating, or adapting to the possible effects of global change.

#### (b) Energy research

The President should direct the Secretary of State (in cooperation with the Secretary of Energy, the Secretary of Commerce, the United States Trade Representative, and other appropriate members of the Committee) to initiate discussions with other nations leading toward an international research protocol for cooperation on the development of energy technologies which have minimally adverse effects on the environment. Such discussions should include, but not be limited to, the following issues:

(1) Creation of an international cooperative program to fund research related to energy efficiency, solar and other renewable energy sources, and passively safe and diversion-resistant nuclear reactors.

(2) Creation of an international cooperative program to develop low cost energy technologies which are appropriate to the environmental, economic, and social needs of developing nations.

(3) Exchange of information concerning environmentally safe energy technologies and practices, including those described in paragraphs (1) and (2).

(Pub. L. 101–606, title II, §203, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3102.)
# Flight Checklist

LED
Motors inactive, safe to handle Low battery, automatic landing Loss of RC signal, automatic landing Pre-arm safety check failure Loss of GPS signal, switch to manual Initializing, hold the X8 level Acquiring GPS, please wait Autopilot ready, GPS locked Armed 

## Safety Button Motors active, deactivate before handling (see reverse) 

## Flight Modes Return to launch **RTL** land at the launch point Stabalize Altitude Hold Loiter Full Autonomy Return to Launch 

### Standard position (altitude hold mode) **STD** fly manually Stabalize Altitude Hold Loiter Full Autonomy Return to Launch


### Loiter mode **LTR** hover Stabalize Altitude Hold Loiter Full Autonomy Return to Launch 

# ! Stand back! 

# 4 6 The motors are now active. Hold left stick down right until motors spin. 

# 2 1 Power on controller; set to STD and RTL OFF. Arm motors. Press and hold safety button until solid red. Connect charged battery.

Choose a clear launch point, and face the X8 away from you. 

# 5 Check LED. 

# 3 Place the X8 at launch point. Go outside to an open area! See the Operation Manual for complete instructions.



### Auto mode **AUTO** fly a mission Stabalize Altitude Hold Loiter Full Autonomy Return to Launch ©2014 3D Robotics. vA. All rights reserved. 

### Control gimbal **TILT** tilt the camera down and up 

### Land **CH7** land at the current position Stabalize Altitude Hold Loiter Full Autonomy Return to Launch Stabalize Altitude Hold Loiter Full Autonomy Return to Launch

Stabalize Altitude Hold Loiter Full Autonomy Return to Launch 

# X8+ Hold the X8 still and level while powering on.Press and hold until blinking red to deactivate.Hold left stick downleft until motors stop. 

# 1 2 Disarm motors. Press safety button. 

# 3 Disconnect battery. 

# 4 Power off controller. 

## Postflight Controller Flight Data Press and hold the DN button to access the flight data screens. Press DN again to toggle between screens.

Lower left stick below center to descend. Set left stick fully down to land when near the ground. Left Stick Left Stick Raise left stick above center to take off and gain altitude. Move left stick left and right to rotate. Use right stick to fly forward, backward, left, and right. Set left stick to center to maintain altitude. Left Stick Left Stick 

## Flight current flight mode
controller battery level (9-12 V) GPS signal strength in # of satellites meters from launch point flight battery level (14-16.8 V) connection strength current latitude current longitude altitude in meters flight time altitude in meters



### For customer support, contact us at help@3dr.com or call our support line at +1 (858) 225-1414 Monday through Friday, from 8 am to 5 pm, PST. 3DR.com/X8/info GPS status speed in m/s flight battery mAh consumed since armed **End your flight at 14.1 V.** Do not exceed 8,000 mAh for a fully charged X8+battery (80% of available capacity). 

# !
### **CHAPTER 123—PROTECTING AMERICANS' DATA FROM FOREIGN ADVERSARIES**

Sec.
9901.
Prohibition on transfer of personally identifiable sensitive data of United States individuals to foreign adversaries.
Exhibit






EXHIBIT 10.12
 
AMENDMENT TO THE
HELIX ENERGY SOLUTIONS GROUP, INC.
EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN


The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc., having reserved the right under section 19 of the Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Plan”) to amend the Plan, does hereby adopt the following amendments to the Plan.  Capitalized terms used herein but not defined shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Plan.


		
	1.
	Effective February 19, 2016, Section 19 is hereby amended to add the following paragraph between the first and final paragraphs of Section 19:




In its sole discretion, the Board or the Committee may cease operations under the Plan, freeze the Plan, or suspend purchases under the Plan at any time (including during a Purchase Period) and for any length of time as it may deem advisable.  No suspension shall operate to (i) reduce any amounts previously allocated to a Participant’s account or (ii) reduce a Participant’s rights with respect to shares of Common Stock previously purchased and held on the Participant’s behalf under the Plan.  If the Board or Committee determines to suspend the Plan, all funds contributed under the Plan (determined in accordance with Section 7) that have not been used to purchase shares of Common Stock shall be returned to the Participants without interest as soon as administratively feasible.


		
	2.
	Effective with respect to Purchase Periods commencing after February 19, 2016, Section (iii) is hereby amended and restated to provide as follows:




		
	(viii)
	the Director of Human Resources as the Administrator shall establish and announce to Participants prior to a Purchase Period a maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be purchased by a Participant during the Purchase Period; provided that, notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, unless the Administrator determines otherwise with respect to a Purchase Period the maximum number of shares of Common Stock a Participant shall be permitted to purchase during a Purchase Period shall be 130 shares; and provided further that the maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be purchased by a Participant during any Purchase Period shall never exceed 10,000 shares.




Except as the Plan is expressly modified by this Amendment, all terms and conditions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.


Adopted on February 19, 2016
# C_2011145EN.01001601.xml

| 14.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 145/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 145/16

---

Action brought on 4 March 2011 — European Commission v French Republic

(Case C-119/11)

2011/C 145/22

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: F. Dintilhac and C. Soulay, agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: French Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, by applying, since 1 January 2007, a VAT rate of 2,10 % to income from charges for admission to the first performances of concerts held in establishments where refreshments may be obtained during the performance, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 99 and 110 of the VAT Directive; (1) |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by applying, since 1 January 2007, a VAT rate of 2,10 % to income from charges for admission to the first performances of concerts held in establishments where refreshments may be obtained during the performance, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 99 and 110 of the VAT Directive; (1)

1

| — | order French Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order French Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

By the present action, the Commission complains that, since 1 January 2007, the defendant has applied a VAT rate of 2,10 % to income from charges for admission to the first performances of concerts held in establishments where refreshments may be obtained during the performance, instead of the earlier rate of 5,5 %.

The Commission points out that, under Article 110 of the VAT Directive, Member States which, at 1 January 1991, were applying reduced rates of VAT lower than the minimum rate of 5 % may continue to apply those rates. However, Member States are not permitted under that provision to introduce new derogations or extend the scope of the derogations existing as at 1 January 1991 where they have restricted the scope of the derogations after that date. However, that is exactly what occurred in this case, since, as from 1 January 1997, the defendant restricted the scope of the derogation existing as at 1 January 1991 in connection with reduced rates of VAT and expressly excluded from this income relating to first performances generated by the sale of tickets ‘which give access solely to concerts held in establishments where refreshments may be obtained during the performance’. By extending the scope of a derogation from the Directive, the French Republic has therefore disregarded the purpose of the Directive.

---

(1)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).

1

---
# C_2011186EN.01002402.xml

| 25.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 186/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 186/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 5 May 2011 — SIMS — École de ski internationale v OHIM — SNMSF (esf école du ski français)

(Case T-41/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community figurative mark esf école du ski français - Absolute grounds for refusal - State emblem - Article 7(1)(h) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 6ter of the Paris Convention - Mark of such a nature as to deceive the public - Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation No 207/2009)

2011/C 186/45

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Syndicat international des moniteurs de ski — École de ski internationale (SIMS — École de ski internationale) (Albertville, France) (represented by: L. Raison-Rebufat, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: initially A. Folliard-Monguiral and subsequently by A. Folliard-Monguiral and J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Syndicat national des moniteurs du ski français (SNMSF) (Meylan, France) (represented by: J.-P. Stouls, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 November 2009 (Case R 235/2009-1), concerning invalidity proceedings between the Syndicat international des moniteurs de ski — École de ski internationale (SIMS — École de ski internationale) and the Syndicat national des moniteurs du ski français (SNMSF)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

dismisses the action;

| 2. | orders the Syndicat international des moniteurs de ski — École de ski internationale (SIMS — École de ski internationale) to pay the costs incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM); |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders the Syndicat international des moniteurs de ski — École de ski internationale (SIMS — École de ski internationale) to pay the costs incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM);

| 3. | orders the Syndicat national des moniteurs du ski français to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

orders the Syndicat national des moniteurs du ski français to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 100, 17.4.2010.

1

---
EXHIBIT 6
                                                         ---------



                    SUBSIDIARIES OF GAMETEK, INC.

          The following is a complete list of all direct and indirect
subsidiaries of GameTek, Inc. as of July 31, 1997:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

NAME OF SUBSIDIARY   JURISDICTION OF       OWNERSHIP OF COMMON
                     INCORPORATION         STOCK
------------------   ---------------       -------------------
<S>                  <C>                   <C>

I.J.E., Inc.         Florida               100% owned by GameTek,Inc.
                                           

GameTek (FL), Inc.   Florida               100% owned by 
                                           I.J.E., Inc.

Gametek (UK) Limited United Kingdon        100% owned by GameTek
                                           (FL), Inc.

Gametek Deutschland  Germany               100% owned by Gametek
GmbH                                       (UK) Limited

Cybersoft, Inc.      Florida               100% owned by GameTek
                                           (FL), Inc.

Alternative Reality  Florida               100% owned by GameTek
Technologies, Inc.                         (FL), Inc.
</TABLE>