alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.61
CHICO’S FAS, INC.
EXECUTIVE BONUS PROGRAMS
PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT
This Participation Agreement is entered into this 25th day of February, 2016, by and between Chico’s FAS, Inc. (the “Company”) and Shelley Broader (the “Participant”).
WHEREAS, the Participant is a key employee of the Company selected by the Company to participate in one or more executive bonus programs (the “Programs”); and
WHEREAS, as a condition to receiving any bonus payable pursuant to any of the Programs, the Participant acknowledges and agrees to be bound by the following condition:
Repayment of Bonus.  If (a) within the two-year period immediately following payment of any Bonus under any Program the Company is required to prepare an accounting restatement due to the material noncompliance of the Company, as a result of misconduct, with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws, and (b) the Participant is subject to automatic forfeiture under Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 or knowingly engaged in the misconduct, was grossly negligent in engaging in the misconduct, knowingly failed to prevent the misconduct or was grossly negligent in failing to prevent the misconduct, then the Participant shall reimburse the Company for the amount of any such Bonus paid under any Program.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Participation Agreement on the date first written above.




	
			
	CHICO’S FAS, INC.

	By:
	 
	/s/ Todd E. Vogensen

	Title:
	 
	Exec. VP & Chief Financial Officer






	
			
	PARTICIPANT:

	 
	 
	/s/ Shelley Broader

	 
	 
	Participant’s Signature

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	Shelley Broader

	 
	 
	Participant’s Name – Please Print
SchweizerischeEidgenossenschaftFederalDepartmentoftheEnvironment,Transport,EnergyandConfdrationsuisseCommunicationsDETECConfederazioneSvizzeraFederalOfficeofClviiAviationFOCAConfederazwnsvizraAviationPolicyandStrategyFOCA,CH-3003BernMr.PaulGretchDirector,OfficeforInternationalAviationOfficeoftheAssistantSecretaryforAviationandinternationalAffairsU.S.DepartmentofTransportation4007thStreet,S.W.,Room6402Washington,DC20590USAReference:0/01/01-02.02.187Yourreference:Ourreference:lJlContactperson:LaurenceFontanaJungoTel.+41313230410,Fax+41313259212,Laurence.fontana-jungobazl.admin.chIttigen,28August2014DeciarationofReciprocityDearMr.Gretch/TheFederalOfficeofCivilAviationofSwitzerlandherewithdeclares,thatitwillconsiderapplicationsbyU.S.aircarriersforapprovaltooperatecharterstoandfromSwitzerlandinaccordancewiththeprovisionsoftheAirTransportAgreementbetweentheSwissConfederationandtheUnitedStatesofAmerica,dated21June2010,and,forthosechartersnotspecifiedintheAnnextotheAgreement,onthebasisofcomityandreciprocity.Yourssincerely.MarcelZuckschwerdtLaurenceFontanaJungoDirectorChiefNegotiatorAirServicesAgreementsHeadAviationPolicyandStrategyFederalOfficeofCivilAviationMühlestrasse3,3063IttigenPostaladdress:CH-3003BemTel.÷41313258039/40,Fax+41313258032www.aviation.admin.ch
§ 385.916 Withdrawal of petition for review (Rule 916). ( a ) At any time, including after a hearing has been held or convened, the petitioner may submit to the presiding officer, and serve on other participants in the proceeding, a withdrawal of the petition for review of the contested order. The presiding officer will thereupon issue, and serve the participants, an order terminating the proceeding conducted pursuant to this subpart, which order will be effective 10 days after issuance.
( b ) Termination of the proceeding under paragraph (a) of this section, may be appealed to the Commission, within 10 days after issuance of the termination order, except that if the Commission does not act on an appeal within 30 days, it is deemed denied. The termination order is stayed pending the appeal. If the Commission rescinds the termination order, the proceeding will continue in accordance with this subpart.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 685 

To amend the Inspector General Act of 1978 relative to the powers of 

the Department of Justice Inspector General. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 6, 2019 

Mr. LEE (for himself, Mr. GRASSLEY, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Mrs. BLACKBURN, 

and Mr. RUBIO) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Inspector General Act of 1978 relative to 

the powers of the Department of Justice Inspector General. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Inspector General Ac5 cess Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INVESTIGATIONS OF DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

7 PERSONNEL. 

8 Section 8E of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 

9 U.S.C. App.) is amended— 

10 (1) in subsection (b)— 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 685 IS

1 (A) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘and 

2 paragraph (3)’’; 

3 (B) by striking paragraph (3); 

4 (C) by redesignating paragraphs (4) and 

5 (5) as paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively; and 

6 (D) in paragraph (4), as redesignated, by 

7 striking ‘‘paragraph (4)’’ and inserting ‘‘para8 graph (3)’’; and 

9 (2) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘, except with 

10 respect to allegations described in subsection 

11 (b)(3),’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
nvls_Ex_10-17


		
			Exhibit 10.17
		

		
			 
		

		
			THIRD AMENDMENT TO LEASE
		

		
			 
		

		
			THIS THIRD AMENDMENT TO LEASE (this “Amendment”), dated as of the 15th day of December, 2015,  is entered into by and between AWEIDA PROPERTIES, INC., a Colorado corporation (“Landlord”), and NIVALIS THERAPEUTICS, INC,  a Delaware Corporation (“Tenant”), to that certain lease dated  March 11, 2010 by and between Landlord and Tenant (the “Lease”), as amended by that certain First Amendment to Lease dated December  5, 2014 and by that cetain certain Second Amendment to Lease dated February 11, 2015, for the lease of Premises located at 3122 Sterling Circle,  Suite 200, Boulder, Colorado 80301.  Capitalized terms used herein which are defined in the Lease shall have the meanings therein stated.
		

		
			 
		

		
			RECITAL
		

		
			 
		

		
			The Tenant desires to add certain space located in the Building to the Premises.
		

		
			 
		

		
			AMENDMENT
		

		
			 
		

		
			NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree to amend the Lease as follows:
		

		
			 
		

		
			1.   Section 2, PREMISES, is hereby amended by adding the following language:
		

		
			 
		

		
			“In addition, Landlord leases to Tenant and Tenant leases from Landlord that certain space located in the loading dock area of the first floor of the Building (the “Space”) commencing January 1, 2016.  The Lease Term for the Space shall be coterminous with the Lease Term for the Lease, provided, however that Tenant shall have the option to terminate the lease on the Space at any time after June 30, 2016 by written notice to the Landlord given at least thirty (30) days prior to the requested termination date.    The rent for the Space shall be $250.00 per month payable in advance.”
		

		
			 
		

		
			2.   Except as expressly amended hereby, the Lease remains unmodified and in full force and effect.  In the event of a conflict between the terms of this Amendment and the Lease, the terms of this Amendment shall control.
		

		
			 
		

		
			IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Amendment, as of the day and year first above written.
		

		
			 
		

			
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						TENANT:

					
					
						 

					
					
						LANDLORD:

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						NIVALIS THERAPEUTICS, INC.

					
					
						 

					
					
						AWEIDA PROPERTIES, INC.

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						By:

					
					
						/s/ Tom Sokolowski

					
					
						 

					
					
						By

					
					
						/s/ Daniel Aweida

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						Tom Sokolowski, VP Finance

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						Daniel J. Aweida, President
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.46

                                January 8, 1997



VIA FACSIMILE (972/323-1589)
CellStar, Ltd.
1730 Briercroft Court
Carrollton, TX  75006
Attn:  Elaine Rodriguez, Vice President

     Re:  Amendment to Section 13(d) of the Supply and Service Agreement entered
          into between CellStar and MCI  (the "Distribution Agreement")
          -------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Elaine:

This letter shall serve to amend Section 13(d) of the Distribution Agreement and
all defined terms used in this letter shall be the same as the defined terms
used in the Distribution Agreement.

The parties agree that the requirement of Section 13(d) to return such Products
within forty-five (45) days of the Effective Date is hereby amended to require
that the Products be shipped within forty-five (45) days of the Effective Date.
CellStar and MCI also hereby agree that (i) all such remaining return Products
will be shipped on Friday, January 10, 1997 via ground transportation regardless
of whether or not return authorizations for those Products have been processed
by CellStar as of that date; and (ii) MCI will be entitled to receive a credit
for such Products in accordance with Section 13 (d) of the Distribution
Agreement as amended by this letter.

Please sign and date a copy of this letter indicating your agreement and send to
MCI/Law and Public Policy via facsimile (703/415-7102) by no later than
Thursday, January 9, 1997 at 12 noon EST.  Thank you.

                                        Sincerely,



                                        /s/ Victoria Harker



                                        Victoria Harker
                                        Vice President Mass Markets Finance


 AGREED:


/s/ Elaine Flud Rodriguez
---------------------------------
Elaine Rodriguez

cc:  Lanese Jorgensen, Esq.
     Michael Chase
     Claire Shields
     Michael McCarthy, Esq.
§ 382.103 Payment. ( a ) Annual charges assessed under this part must be paid within 45 days of the issuance of the bill by the Commission, unless a petition for waiver has been filed under § 382.105 of this part.
( b ) Payment must be made by check, draft, or money order, payable to the United States Treasury.
( c ) If payment is not made within 45 days of issuance of a bill, interest will be assessed. Interest will be computed in accordance with § 154.501(d) of this chapter, from the date on which the bill becomes delinquent.
[Order 472, 52 FR 21292, June 5, 1987, as amended at 61 FR 13421, Mar. 27, 1996]
Order entered July 16, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00664-CV

MEDICAL CITY DALLAS HOSPITAL, INC., ET AL., Appellants

V.

ARDELL WILLIAMS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-13-04209-A

ORDER

We GRANT appellee’s July 14, 2014 unopposed motion for an extension of time to file 

her brief. Appellee shall file her brief on or before August 15, 2014. We caution appellee that 

no further extension of time will be granted in this accelerated appeal absent extraordinary 

circumstances.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report of Prospect MedicalHoldings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006(the “Report”), I, Mike Heather, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.
| August 14, 2006 |       | /s/ MIKE HEATHER                           |
|-----------------|------------|--------------------------------------------|
|            | ** ** | **Mike Heather   Chief Financial Officer** |

 

----
# C_2012366EN.01001802.xml

| 24.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 366/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 366/18

---

Order of the Court of 12 July 2012 — Densmore Ronald Dover v European Parliament

(Case C-278/11 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the European Parliament - Review of the use of allowances - Parliamentary assistance allowance - Justification of expenditure - Recovery of undue payments)

2012/C 366/30

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Densmore Ronald Dover (represented by: D. Vaughan QC, M. Lester, Barrister and R. Collard, Solicitor)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Parliament (represented by: D. Moore and M. Windisch, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 March 2011 in Case T-149/09 Dover v European Parliament by which the General Court annulled in part the Decision of the Secretary-General of the European Parliament of 29 January 2009 to recover certain sums unduly paid to the appellant by way of expenses and parliamentary allowances

Dover

European Parliament

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Mr Densmore Ronald Dover is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Densmore Ronald Dover is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 252, 27.8.2011.

1

---
#### § 367.4114 Account 411.4, Investment tax credit adjustments, service company property.

This account must include the amount of those investment tax credit adjustments that relate to service company property.
# C_2011145EN.01001101.xml

| 14.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 145/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 145/11

---

Action brought on 24 February 2011 — European Commission v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

(Case C-86/11)

2011/C 145/15

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal, Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Defendant:

The applicant claims that the Court should:

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that by permitting non-taxable persons to be members of a VAT group (a single taxable person for VAT purposes), the United Kingdom has failed to comply with its obligations under Articles 9 and 11 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC (1) of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that by permitting non-taxable persons to be members of a VAT group (a single taxable person for VAT purposes), the United Kingdom has failed to comply with its obligations under Articles 9 and 11 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC (1) of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax;

1

| — | order United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

For reasons of facility and in order to combat possible abuses, the VAT directive allows Member States to treat two or more taxable persons together as a single taxable person. It is submitted that the directive does not allow them to include non-taxable persons in such a group, thus extending the rights and obligations of taxable persons to non-taxable persons. The United Kingdom legislation which permits the inclusion of non-taxable persons in a VAT group is thus contrary to the directive.

---

(1)  OJ L 347, p. 1

1

---
This memorandum opinion was not selected for pub lication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations fr om the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1 FRANK DOMBOS, 2 Plaintiff-Appellant, 3 v. No. 33,703 4 ROBERT STEWART, 5 Defendant-Appellee, 6 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CIBOLA COUNTY 7 Camille Martinez Olguin, District Judge 8 Frank J. Dombos 9 Santa Fe, NM 10 Pro Se Appellant 11 NM Department of Corrections 12 Kathleen O. Ayala 13 Santa Fe, NM 14 for Appellee 15 MEMORANDUM OPINION 16 FRY, Judge. 17

{1} Plaintiff appealed the grant of summary judgment in Defendant’s favor, as well 18 as the district court’s refusal to grant Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment. We 19 issued a notice of proposed disposition proposing to affirm in part and reverse in part, 202 and neither party has filed a memorandum opposing that proposed disposition. 1 Therefore, for the reasons stat ed in the notice, we affirm the district court’s judgment 2 in part and reverse it in part. 3

{2} IT IS SO ORDERED. 4

5 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge 6 WE CONCUR: 7

8 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge 9

10 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge 11
### §3605. Notice of conversion and opportunity to purchase; responsibility of State and local governments

It is the sense of the Congress that, when multifamily rental housing projects are converted to condominium or cooperative use, tenants in those projects are entitled to adequate notice of the pending conversion and to receive the first opportunity to purchase units in the converted projects and that State and local governments which have not already provided for such notice and opportunity for purchase should move toward that end. The Congress believes it is the responsibility of State and local governments to provide for such notice and opportunity to purchase in a prompt manner. The Congress has decided not to intervene and therefore leaves this responsibility to State and local governments to be carried out.

(Pub. L. 96–399, title VI, §606, Oct. 8, 1980, 94 Stat. 1676.)
ex10-1.htm


Exhibit 10.1







Verbal agreement


Dated December 10, 2015












This Verbal Agreement (“Agreement”) is made between Corina Safaler (“President”), President of Wike Corp. and Wike Corp. (“Company”).







This Agreement is witness therefore that President has agreed to loan the Company needed funds, in the amount of $400 US (“Loan”), which is necessary for the Company’s start up process and expanses.







The Loan is unsecured and does not bear any interest. The Loan does not have the repayment date and other provisions.







 


/s/ Corina Safaler               







Corina Safaler


Chief Executive Officer & President of Wike Corp.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

** **

I, Stanley D. Piekos,certify that:

 

1.     I havereviewed this report on Form 10-Q of August Technology Corporation;

 

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)     Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

c)     Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)     All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date:  August 11, 2003 | By:                     | /s/ STANLEY D.  PIEKOS |   |
|-----------------------------|-------------------------|------------------------|--------|
|                        | Stanley D. Piekos       |
|                        | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Roche Itee, Groupe-conseil

747, 5e rue

Shawinigan (Quebec) Canada G9N 1G2

T 819 536-5652 F819 536-7170

www.roche.ca


CONSENT OF QUALIFIED PERSON


To :
All Canadian Securities Regulatory Authorities (SEDAR)

United States Securities and Exchange Commission (EDGAR)

Toronto Stock Exchange (SEDAR)

NYSE Amex (EDGAR)

Aurizon Mines Ltd.


Re:
Technical Report on the Mineral Resource Estimation - Joanna Gold Project, Rouyn-Noranda, Quebec, September 2011 Update (the "Report") prepared for Aurizon Mines Ltd. (the "Company")


I,Martin Magnan, Eng., do hereby confirm that I am a qualified person under National Instrument 43-101 and a co-author of the Report.


The undersigned, for himself and on behalf of Roche Inc., pursuant to Section 8.3 of National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projectsthis letter is being filed as the consent to the public filing of the Report and to the use of extracts from, or summaries of, the Report in the Company's Annual Information Form for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 (the "AIF") and to being named in the AIF.


The undersigned, for himself and on behalf of Roche Inc., confirms to have read the written disclosure in the AIF stated to be derived from the Report and that it fairly and accurately represents the information contained in the Report.


The undersigned further acknowledges that the AIF will be filed as an Exhibit to the Company's Annual Report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 (the "Form 40-F") and consents to Roche Inc., being named in the Form 40-F and authorize the use of the information represented therein relating to the Report.


Dated this 28th day of March, 2012.


Martin Magnan, Eng.