alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


              Consent Of Independent Certified Public Accountants



Advanced Nutraceuticals, Inc.
9101 Jameel
Houston, Texas 77040

We have issued our report dated January 3, 2001, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements included in the Annual Report of Advanced Nutraceuticals,
Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the year ended September 30, 2000. We hereby consent to
the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statement for
Advanced Nutraceuticals, Inc. (the successor issuer to Nutrition For Life
International, Inc.) on Form S-8 (File No. 33-99366, effective December 5,
1995).



Grant Thornton LLP
Houston, Texas
April 17, 2001
March 10, 2015

Mr. Dean D'Eugenio 

1212 East Joppa Road

Towson MD 21286

Dear Mr. D'Eugenio:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your February 9, 2015, exemption request on behalf of Allied Remodeling of 

Central Maryland into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-0299), but we are unable to process 

your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of 

§ 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of 

the following:

• The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief.

• Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Nia Daniels

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
Exhibit 21
                             THERMO REMEDIATION INC.

                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant


      As of May 23, 1997, Thermo Remediation Inc. owned the following companies:

                                                           STATE OR
                                                         JURISDICTION   PERCENT
                             NAME                            OF          OF
                                                         INCORPORATION OWNERSHIP
                                                              
              Eberline Holdings Inc.                      Delaware       100
                 Eberline Analytical Corporation          New Mexico     100
                   Thermo Hanford Inc.                    Delaware       100
                   TMA/NORCAL Inc.                        California     100
              IEM Sealand Corporation                     Virginia       100
              Remediation Technologies, Inc.              Delaware       100
                 RETEC Thermal, Inc.                      Delaware       100
                   ReTec/Tetra L.C.                       Texas           50*
                 TriTechnics Corporation                  Colorado       100
              Thermo Fluids Inc.                          Delaware       100
              TPS Technologies Inc.                       Florida        100
                 TPST Soil Recyclers of California Inc.   California     100
                   California Hydrocarbon, Inc.           Nevada         100
                 TPST Soil Recyclers of Maryland Inc.     Maryland       100
                   Todds Lane Limited Partnership         Maryland       100*
                   (1% of which is owned directly
                    by TPS Technologies Inc.)
                 TPST Soil Recyclers of New York Inc.     New York       100
                 TPST Soil Recyclers of Oregon Inc.       Oregon         100
                 TPST Soil Recyclers of South Carolina    Delaware       100
                   Inc.
                 TPST Soil Recyclers of Virginia Inc.     Delaware       100
                 TPST Soil Recyclers of Washington Inc.   Washington     100
            TMA/Hanford, Inc.                             Washington     100
         Thermo Securities Corporation                    Delaware       100
         Thermo Soil Recyclers Inc.                       Massachusetts  100
         Thermo Technology Ventures Inc.                  Idaho          100
            Plasma Quench Investment Limited Partnership  Delaware        60*

       
      * Joint Venture/Partnership
### §7508. Additional centers

#### (a) American Nanotechnology Preparedness Center

The Program shall provide for the establishment, on a merit-reviewed and competitive basis, of an American Nanotechnology Preparedness Center which shall—

(1) conduct, coordinate, collect, and disseminate studies on the societal, ethical, environmental, educational, legal, and workforce implications of nanotechnology; and

(2) identify anticipated issues related to the responsible research, development, and application of nanotechnology, as well as provide recommendations for preventing or addressing such issues.

#### (b) Center for nanomaterials manufacturing

The Program shall provide for the establishment, on a merit reviewed and competitive basis, of a center to—

(1) encourage, conduct, coordinate, commission, collect, and disseminate research on new manufacturing technologies for materials, devices, and systems with new combinations of characteristics, such as, but not limited to, strength, toughness, density, conductivity, flame resistance, and membrane separation characteristics; and

(2) develop mechanisms to transfer such manufacturing technologies to United States industries.

#### (c) Reports

The Council, through the Director of the National Nanotechnology Coordination Office, shall submit to the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and the House of Representatives Committee on Science—

(1) within 6 months after December 3, 2003, a report identifying which agency shall be the lead agency and which other agencies, if any, will be responsible for establishing the Centers described in this section; and

(2) within 18 months after December 3, 2003, a report describing how the Centers described in this section have been established.

(Pub. L. 108–153, §9, Dec. 3, 2003, 117 Stat. 1930.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on Science of House of Representatives changed to Committee on Science and Technology of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 6, One Hundred Tenth Congress, Jan. 5, 2007. Committee on Science and Technology of House of Representatives changed to Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 5, One Hundred Twelfth Congress, Jan. 5, 2011.
EXHIBIT 32-1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of WNC WNC Housing Tax Credit Fund IV, L.P., Series 1 (the “Partnership”) for the year ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section1350, as adopted pursuant to section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.








/s/WILFRED N. COOPER, JR.


Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.


President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.


Date: June 27, 2011
§ 16.14 Departmental recommendation for takeover. ( a ) A Federal department or agency may file a recommendation that the United States exercise its right to take over a hydroelectric power project with a license that is subject to sections 14 and 15 of the Federal Power Act. The recommendation must: ( 1 ) Be filed no earlier than five years before the license expires and no later than the end of the comment period specified by the Commission in: ( i ) A notice of application for a new license, a nonpower license, or an exemption for the project; or
( ii ) A notice of an amendment to an application for a new license, a nonpower license, or an exemption;
( 2 ) Be filed in accordance with the formal requirements for filings in subpart T of part 385 of the Commission's regulations and be served on each relevant Federal and state resource agency, all applicants for new license, nonpower license or exemption, and any other party to the proceeding;
( 3 ) Specify the project works that would be taken over by the United States;
( 4 ) Describe the proposed Federal operation of the project, including any plans for its redevelopment, and discuss the manner in which takeover would serve the public interest as fully as non-Federal development and operation;
( 5 ) State whether the agency intends to undertake the operation of the project; and
( 6 ) Include the information required by §§ 4.41, 4.51, or 4.61 of this chapter, as appropriate.
( b ) A department or agency that files a takeover recommendation becomes a party to the proceeding.
( c ) An applicant or potential applicant for a new license, a nonpower license, or an exemption that involves a takeover recommendation may file a reply to the recommendation, within 120 days from the date the takeover recommendation is filed with the Commission. The reply must be filed with the Commission in accordance with part 385 of the Commission's regulations and a copy of such a reply must be served on the agency recommending the takeover and on any other party to the proceeding.
**Crisis Counseling Assistance and Training Program (CCP)**

**Training Feedback Form for Participants**

**CCP Name/Disaster Number: _______________________________________**

1. The goals and objectives of the training were clearly stated. 

2. The training content, handouts, and activities were effective in meeting the stated objectives. 

3. The content of the training module was well organized. 

4. The information was clearly presented. 

5. The trainer demonstrated thorough knowledge of the subject matter. 

6. The trainer facilitated the session effectively (e.g., exercises were appropriate and well executed, and the training was on schedule). 

7. The length of the training was appropriate for the amount of material covered. 

8. The training environment was physically comfortable (e.g., temperature, room size, setup). 

9. What elements of this training session will most assist you in effectively performing your job duties? 

10. How do you think the module content or the training session could be improved? 

Thank you for your valued feedback. Please return this form to your trainer. Copies will be mailed to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) Disaster Technical Assistance Center (DTAC) at:

**SAMHSA DTAC**

c/o IQ Solutions 

11300 Rockville Pike 

Suite 901

Rockville, MD 20852
# Gulfstream

A GENERAL DYNAMICS CQMPANV' September 4, 2012 A&C-12-654 u.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Operations West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140 1200 New JerseyAvenue, SE. Washington, DC 20590 Subject: Requestfor Exemption from Section 25.981 (a)(3) Fuel System Ignition Prevention FAA Project No.: TC8700AT-T Attachment: Petition for Exemption - Fuel Tank Ignition Prevention Reference: 1) Gulfstream LetterA&C-12-642, Request for Exemption from Section 25.981 (a)(3) Fuel System Ignition Prevention 2) Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-0951 Dear Sirs: On August 30, 2012, Gulfstream submitted reference 1) to the docket. After submittal we identified a typographical error. In order to ensure accuracy, we request that reference 1) be retracted and replacedwith this letter and its enclosure. In accordance with 14 CFR part 11, Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation requests consideration ofthe enclosed petition for exemption. This petition is being submitted to relieve the Gulfstream GVI model aircraft from full compliance with 14 CFR 25.981 (a)(3) at amendment 25-102, to account for a potential failure that would result in an uncontrollable high thrust condition in a very limited portion ofthe flight envelope forthe GVI aircraft. Ifyou have any questions or require any additional information please contact mevia the contact information listed below or Natalie Mault at 912-965-5466. Robert Glasscock Certification Director, G650 Program Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation P.O. Box 2206, MIS R-03 Savannah, GA 31402-2206 robert.glasscock@gulfstream.com (912) 965-6817 cc: N. Berrryman, FAAACE-100G (via email) P.O. Box 2206 • Savannah, GA 31402-2206 USA. Telephone (912) 965-3000 • gulfstream.com
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Caprock Canyon  Investments,
Inc.,  on Form 10- QSB for the period  ending  March 31,  2004 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "REPORT"),  the
undersigned, B. Stephen Bailey, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: April 19, 2004

/s/ B. Stephen Bailey
B. Stephen Bailey
President
(Principal Executive & Accounting Officer)


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 350.7 Fees and charges. ( a ) Fees and charges for service under the regulations in this part shall be paid by the applicant for the service in accordance with this section, and, if required by the Administrator, the fees and charges shall be paid in advance.
( b ) The fees and charges provided for in this section shall be paid by check, draft, or money order payable to the Treasurer of the United States and shall be remitted promptly to the Administrator upon furnishing to the applicant of a statement as to the amount due.
( c ) The fees to be charged and collected for service under the regulations in this part shall be at the rates specified in §§ 391.2, 391.3, and 391.4 respectively for base time; for overtime including Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays; and for certain laboratory services which are not covered under the base time, overtime, and/or holiday costs. Such fees shall cover the costs of the service and shall be charged for the time required to render such services. Where appropriate, this time will include, but will not be limited to, the time required for travel of the inspector or inspectors in connection therewith during the regularly scheduled administrative workweek.
( d ) Charges may also be made to cover the cost of travel and other expenses incurred by the Service in connection with the furnishing of the service.
( e ) Exporters that submit electronic export certificate applications will be charged a fee per application submitted.
( f ) For each calendar year, FSIS will calculate the electronic export certificate application fee, using the following formula: Labor Costs (Technical Support Cost + Export Library Maintenance Cost) + Information Technology Costs (On-going operations Cost + Maintenance Cost + eAuthentication Cost), divided by the number of export applications.
( g ) FSIS will publish notice of the electronic export certificate application fee annually in the Federal Register.
[23 FR 9982, Dec. 23, 1958, as amended at 53 FR 13397, Apr. 22, 1988; 54 FR 6389, Feb. 10, 1989; 81 FR 42234, June 29, 2016]
#### § 367.1730 Account 173, Accrued revenues.

At the option of the service company, the estimated amount accrued for service rendered, but not billed at the end of any accounting period, may be included in this account. In case accruals are made for unbilled revenues, they must be made likewise for unbilled expenses, such as for the purchase of energy.
Exhibit




Amendment to Offer Letter between Galena Biopharma, Inc. and Thomas J. Knapp


This amendment (“Amendment”) to the Offer Letter dated June 23, 2015 between Galena Biopharma, Inc. and Thomas J. Knapp (“Offer Letter”) is made this December 31, 2015 and amends the Offer Letter with the following provisions:


		
	1.
	The term of the Amendment (“Amendment Term”) will commence on January 1, 2016 and end on September 30, 2016, unless sooner terminated as provide in the Offer Letter or is extended by mutual agreement.


		
	2.
	During the Amendment Term, the salary shall be $27,895.83 ($334,750 annualized) per month (prorated for any period of less than a full month), payable in accordance with our standard payroll practices and subject to deductions for applicable federal, state and local withholding.


		
	3.
	You will be paid a 2015 bonus of $48,750 payable in January, 2016, in accordance with our standard bonus payment procedures.


		
	4.
	The Company will grant you under its Amended and Restated 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2007 Plan”), a non-qualified stock option to purchase up to 225,000 shares of common stock of the Company. The option will have an exercise price equal to the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant, will vest in 16 equal, quarterly installments over 4 years, beginning 3 months from the date of grant, so long as you remain in the Company’s continuous service through each monthly vesting date, and be on such other terms and provisions as are contained in the Company’s standard-form nonqualified stock option agreement under the 2007 Plan.


		
	5.
	This offer letter and any dispute concerning the validity, enforceability or interpretation of this offer letter or the terms of your employment will be governed by the internal laws of the State of California without regard to conflict-of-law principles.




All other terms in the Offer Letter shall remain in full force and effect.


Galena Biopharma, Inc.                Thomas J. Knapp


/s/ Mark W. Schwartz                                                  /s/ Thomas J. Knapp
By: Mark W. Schwartz                 
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
# C_2013108EN.01000602.xml

| 13.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/6

---

Order of the Court of 10 January 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākās tiesas Senāts) — Ilgvars Brunovskis v Lauku atbalsta dienests

(Case C-650/11) (1)

1

(Common agricultural policy - Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 - Implementation of support schemes in the new Member States - Complementary national direct payments - Conditions for grant - Regulation (EC) No 1973/2004 - Inapplicable)

2013/C 108/11

Language of the case: Latvian

Referring court

Referring court

Augstākās tiesas Senāts

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Ilgvars Brunovskis

Applicant:

Defendant: Lauku atbalsta dienests

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Augstākās tiesas Senāts — Interpretation of Article 125(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 of 29 September 2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers and amending Regulations (EEC) No 2019/93, (EC) No 1452/2001, (EC) No 1453/2001, (EC) No 1454/2001, (EC) 1868/94, (EC) No 1251/1999, (EC) No 1254/1999, (EC) No 1673/2000, (EEC) No 2358/71 and (EC) No 2529/2001 (OJ 2003 L 270, p. 1) and Article 102(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1973/2004 of 29 October 2004 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 as regards the support schemes provided for in Titles IV and IVa of that Regulation and the use of land set aside for the production of raw materials (OJ 2003 L 345, p. 1) — Suckler cow premium — National rules providing for the grant of the premium by full calendar year only for suckler cows and heffers registered as eligible for the premium by 1 July at the latest in the relevant calendar year — Whether or not all suckler cows taken into consideration in the calendar year concerned

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

European Union law and, in particular, Article 143(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003 of 29 September 2003 establishing common rules for direct support schemes under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers and amending Regulations (EEC) No 2019/93, (EC) No 1452/2001, (EC) No 1453/2001, (EC) No 1454/2001, (EC) 1868/94, (EC) No 1251/1999, (EC) No 1254/1999, (EC) No 1673/2000, (EEC) No 2358/71 and (EC) No 2529/2001 must be interpreted as meaning that they do not preclude national rules, such as those at issue in the main proceedings, governing certain complementary national direct payments linked to the presence of suckler cows in a herd and making the grant of those payments conditional on a declaration made before 1 July of the year concerned, even though cows which become suckler cows after that date cannot be taken into account.

---

(1)  OJ C 49, 18.2.2012.

1

---