1

ICRAS and OMB Number: **ICR No. 1667.10 1855 -**  **0011** Revised: 05/23/2013

**Magnet Schools Assistance Program Application for Grants**

**SUPPORTING STATEMENT FOR PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT SUBMISSION**  ICRAS and OMB Number: ICR No. 1667.10 1855
- 0011

Revised 05/23/2013 

### A. Justification **1. Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary.**  **Identify any legal or administrative requirements that necessitate the collection. Attach a**  **hard copy of the appropriate section of each statute and regulation**  **mandating or authorizing the collection of information ,**  **or you may**  **provide a valid URL**  **link or paste the applicable section .**  **Please limit pasted text to no longer than 3 pages.**  **Specify the review type of the collection (new, revision, extension, reinstate**  **ment with change, reinstatement without change) . If revised, briefly specify**  **the changes. If a rulemaking is involved, make note of the sections or changed sections, if applicable.**  The U.S. Department of Education is requesting an extension without chang e for a collection to make awards under the Magnet Schools Assistance P rogram (MSAP) using the approved Application for Grants (OMB Control Number 1855

- 0011) . The activities under the MSAP competition are authorized under the Title V, Part C of the Elementary and Secondary

Education Act, as amended

. The Magnet Schools Assistance program provides grants to eligible local educational agencies to establish and operate magnet schools that are operated under a court

- ordered or federall y approved voluntary desegregation plan. These grants assist in the desegregation of public schools by supporting the elimination, reduction, and prevention of minority

group isolation in elementary and secondary

schools with substantial numbers of minority

group students. Inorder to meet the statutory purposes of the program, projects also must support the development and implementation of magnet schools that assist in the achievement of s ys temic reforms and provide all students with the opportunity

to meet challenging ac ademic content and student academic achievement standards. Projects support the development and design of innovative education methods and practices that promote diversity and increase choices in public education programs. The program supports capacity dev elopment

–the ability

of a school to help all its students meet more challenging standards

–through professional development and other activities that will enable the continued operation of the magnet schools at a high performance level after funding ends. F inally , the program supports the implementation of courses of instruction in magnet schools that strengthen students’ knowledge of academic subjects and their grasp of tangible and marketable vocational skills.2

ICRAS and OMB Number: **ICR No. 1667.10 1855 -**  **0011** Revised: 05/23/2013
**2. Indicate how, by whom, and for what purpose**  **the information is to be used. Except for a new collection, indicate the actual use the agency has made of the information**  **received from the current collection.** The application package requests programmatic and budgetary information needed to evaluate new applications and make funding decisions based on the authorizing statute , program regulations, and EDGAR. Failure to collect this information would prevent the awarding of appropriated funds; essential information would not be available for evaluating the applications in accordance with the statute and regulations. **3. Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use**  **of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or forms of information**  **technology, e.g. permitting electronic submission of responses, and the basis for the decision of adopting this means of collection. Also describe any**  **consideration given to using technology to reduce burden.** For fiscal year 201 3 , as a part of the Department’s goal to increase the electronic submission of applications, applications for grants under the MSAP will be submitted electronically

via the Grants.gov portal. We estimate that the Department will receive 100 percent of the applications electronicall y. The application package will be prepared in a format for easier and faster posting of information on the Web. Prospective applicants will be able to view and download the application through the FIND function on Grants.gov at http://www.Grants.Gov

. **4. Describe ef** 

**forts to identify duplication. Show specifically why any similar**  **information already available cannot be used or modified for use for the purposes described in Item 2**  **above.** Since the information submitted in the application is unique to each respondent, no duplication exists as far as can be determined. There is no other collection instrument available to collect the information that is being requested. **5. If the collection of informatio**  **n impacts small businesses or other small entities, describe any methods used to minimize burden. A small entity may be (1) a small**  **business which is deemed to be one that is independently owned and operated and that is not dominant in its field of operati**  **on; (2) a small organization that is any not****** **for -**  **profit enterprise that is independently owned and operated and is not dominant in its field; or (3) a small government jurisdiction, which is a government of a city,**  **county, town, township, school district, or special district with a population of less**  **than 50,000.** This information collection does not involve small businesses or other small entities. **6. Describe the consequences to Federal program or policy activities if the collection is**  **not conducted or is con ducted less frequently, as well as any technical or legal**  **obstacles to reducing burden.** If the collection is not conducted or is collected less frequentl y, the Department cannot meet its grant making responsibilities, including the publication of closing d ate notices, providing technical assistance to potential applicants, conducting peer reviews of grant3

ICRAS and OMB Number: **ICR No. 1667.10 1855 -**  **0011** Revised: 05/23/2013 applications, transmitting slates with funding recommendations to Department officials for approval, and making grant awards. The Department needs to make grant applications available to its constituencies to give eligible applicants time to develop and submit applications, and to make new fiscal year grant awards in a timely

manner. **7. Explain any special circumstances that would cause an information co**  **llection to be conducted in a manner:** 
 **requiring respondents to report information to the agency more often than quarterly;** 
 **requiring respondents to prepare a written response to a collection of information in fewer than 30 days after receipt of it;** 
 **requiri ng respondents to submit more than an original and two copies of any**  **document;**
 **requiring respondents to retain records, other than health, medical, government contract, grant** **- in**  **- aid, or tax records for more than three years;** 
 **in connection with a statistical survey, that is not designed to produce valid and**  **reliable results than can be generalized to the universe of study;**
 **requiring the use of a statistical data classification that has not been reviewed and approved by OMB;** 
 **that includes a pledge o f confidentiality that is not supported by authority**  **established in statute or regulation, that is not supported by disclosure and data security policies that are consistent with the pledge, or that unnecessarily**  **impedes sharing of data with other agencies for compatible confidential use; or** 
 **requiring respondents to submit proprietary trade secrets, or other confidential information unless the agency can demonstrate that it has instituted procedures**  **to protect the information’s confidentiality to the extent permitted by law.**  No information will be collected in the manner covered under any of the special circumstances outlined. **8. As**  **applicable, state that the Department has published the 60 and 30 Federal**  **Register notices as required by 5 CFR 1320.8(d), solicit** **ing comments on the information collection prior to submission to OMB. Summarize public comments**  **received in response to that notice and describe actions taken by the agency in response to these comments. Specifically address comments received on cost an**  **d hour burden.**  **Describe efforts to consult with persons outside the agency to obtain their views on the availability of data, frequency of collection, the clarity of instruction and record**  **keeping, disclosure, or reporting format (if any), and on the data elements to be**  **recorded, disclosed, or reported. Consultation with representatives of those from whom information is to be obtained**  **or those who must compile records should occur at least once every 3 years**

**– even if** 4

ICRAS and OMB Number: **ICR No. 1667.10 1855 -**  **0011** Revised: 05/23/2013 **the collection of information activity is the same as in prior periods. There may be**  **circumstances that may preclude consultation in a specific situation. These circumstances should be explained.**  The Department is meeting all requirements of public comment periods. In formal discussions with past applicants have occurred on an ongoing basis since the time of the most recent data collection using the MSAP application package for the FY 2013 MSAP grant competition through individual meetings with school district representatives and through meetings with organizations that have a particular interest in the program, most notably Magnet Schools of America. Based on this feedback as well as program staff anal ys es regarding application errors and data omissions, we believe that changes instituted in conjunction with the previous OMB clearance submission for the MSAP application package have worked well to remedy problems of insufficient guidance and lack of clarity

regarding certain data requirements associated with the application

. Also, a 30

- day

no tice was published in the Federal Register. **9. Explain any decision to provide any payment or gift to respondents, other than**  **remuneration of contractors or grantees with meaningful justification**  **.** The Department will not provide any paym ents or gifts to resp ondents. **10. Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for**  **the assurance in statute, regulation, or agency policy. If personally identifiable information (PII) is being collected, a Privacy Act statement should be included**  **on the instrument. Please provide a citation for the Systems of Record Notice and the**  **date a Privacy Impact Assessment was completed as indicated on the IC Data Form**  **. A confidentiality statement with a legal citation that authorizes the**  **pledge of**  **confiden tiality**  **should be provided. Requests for this information are in accordance**  **with the following ED and OMB policies: Privacy Act of 1974, OMB Circular A -**  **108**

**– Privacy Act Implementation** 

**– Guidelines and Responsibilities, OMB Circular A** **** **130 Appendix I**

**– Fede**  **ral Agency Responsibilities for Maintaining Records About Individuals, OMB M** **- 03**  **- 22** 

**– OMB Guidance for Implementing the Privacy**  **Provisions of the E -**  **Government Act of 2002, OMB M -**  **06 -**  **15**

**– Safeguarding**  **Personally Identifiable Information, OM:6 -**  **104**

**– Privacy Ac**  **t of 1974 (Collection, Use and Protection of Personally Identifiable Information)**  **. If the collection is**  **subject to the Privacy Act, the Privacy Act statement is deemed sufficient with respect to confidentiality. If there is no expectation of confidentialit** **y, simply state that the Department make**  **s no pledge about the confidentially of the data.**  There is no assurance of confidentiality

. **11. Provide additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature, such as**  **sexual behavior and attitudes, religious b eliefs, and other matters that are**  **commonly considered private. The justification should include the reasons why the agency considers the questions necessary, the specific uses to be made of the**  **information, the explanation to be given to persons from who m the information is**  **requested, and any steps to be taken to obtain their consent.** This application does not include questions about sexual behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, or other items that are commonl y considered sensitive and private.5

ICRAS and OMB Number: **ICR No. 1667.10 1855 -**  **0011** Revised: 05/23/2013
**12. Provide estimates of the hour burden of the collection of information. The**  **statement should:**
 **Indicate the number of respondents by affected public type (federal government, individuals or households, private sector** 

**– businesses or other for** **- profit, privat**  **e sector** 

**– not**  **- for** **- profit institutions, farms, state, local or tribal governments),**  **frequency of response, annual hour burden, and an explanation of how the burden was estimated, including identification of burden type: recordkeeping,**  **reporting or third pa rty disclosure. All narrative should be included in item 12.**  **Unless directed to do so, agencies should not conduct special surveys to obtain information on which to base hour burden estimates. Consultation with a**  **sample (fewer than 10) of potential respo ndents is desirable. If the hour burden**  **on respondents is expected to vary widely because of differences in activity, size, or complexity, show the range of estimated hour burden, and explain the reasons**  **for the variance. Generally, estimates should not include burden hours for**  **customary and usual business practices.**
 **If this request for approval covers more than one form, provide separate hour burden estimates for each form and aggregate the hour burdens in the**  **ROCIS IC Burden Analysis Table.**  **(The table should at**  **minimum include Respondent**  **types, IC activity, Respondent and Responses, Hours/Response, and Total Hours)** 
 **Provide estimates of annualized cost to respondents of the hour burdens for collections of information, identifying and using appropriate wa**  **ge rate categories. The cost of contracting out or paying outside parties for information**  **collection activities should not be included here. Instead, this cost should be included in Item 14.**  The anticipated number of respondents is 150. The average burden per response is estimated at 40 hours and the number of responses per applicant remains one. The data collection occurs once every three years. The burden, based on 150 responses to the MSAP application package that occurs at an average burden of approximately 40 hours/response, is 6,000 hours, occurring once every three years. Because respondents will now submit applications electronically using the Grants.gov APPLY module, costs to respondents are limited to the costs of preparation of the applicati on. Based on the estimate that 150 applications will be submitted, costs to respondents are estimated to be the following: 150 apps x 40 hours/application x $30/hour = $180,000 **13. Provide an estimate of the total annual cost burden to respondents or record**  **k eepers resulting from the collection of information. (Do not include the cost of any**  **hour burden shown in Items 12 and 14.)**
 **The cost estimate should be split into two components: (a) a total capital and start** **- up cost component (annualized over its expecte**  **d useful life); and (b) a total operation and maintenance and purchase of services component. The estimates**  **should take into account costs associated with generating, maintaining, and disclosing or providing the information. Include descriptions of metho**  **ds used to estimate major cost factors including system and technology acquisition,**  **expected useful life of capital equipment, the discount rate(s), and the time**6

ICRAS and OMB Number: **ICR No. 1667.10 1855 -**  **0011** Revised: 05/23/2013

**period over which costs will be incurred. Capital and start -**  **up costs include, among other ite**  **ms, preparations for collecting information such as purchasing computers and software; monitoring, sampling, drilling and testing equipment;**  **and acquiring and maintaining record storage facilities.**
 **If cost estimates are expected to vary widely, agencies sh ould present ranges of**  **cost burdens and explain the reasons for the variance. The cost of contracting out information collection services should be a part of this cost burden estimate.**  **In developing cost burden estimates, agencies may consult with a samp le of**  **respondents (fewer than 10), utilize the 60 -**  **day pre -**  **OMB submission public comment process and use existing economic or regulatory impact analysis**  **associated with the rulemaking containing the information collection, as appropriate.** 
 **Generally, estimat es should not include purchases of equipment or services, or**  **portions thereof, made: (1) prior to October 1, 1995, (2) to achieve regulatory compliance with requirements not associated with the information collection, (3)**  **for reasons other than to provide information or keep records for the**  **government or (4) as part of customary and usual business or private practices.**  **Also, these estimates should not include the hourly costs (i.e., the monetization of the hours) captured above in Item 12**  **Total Annualized C apital/Startup Cost:**  **Total Annual Costs (O&M): Total Annualized Costs Requested:**  Annual Costs to Respondents (capital/start

-up, and operation and maintenance): The total for the capital and start

-up cost components for this information collection is zero. This information collection will not require the purchase of any capital equipment nor create any startup costs. **14. Provide estimates of annualized cost to the Federal government. Also, provide a**  **description of the method used to estimate cost, which should include quantification**  **of hours, operational expenses (such as equipment, overhead, printing, and support staff), and any other expense that would not have been incurred without this**  **collection of information. Agencies also may aggregate cost estim ates from Items**  **12, 13, and 14 in a single table.** Cost to Federal Government: **Cost for Federally -**  **supervised review of applications** 9 readers @ $1,000 each $9,000 Processing applications

– staff (8 staff x 40 hours x $48 per hours=$15,360) (Overhead cost: $15,360 x 50 percent = $7,680) $23,0407

ICRAS and OMB Number: **ICR No. 1667.10 1855 -**  **0011** Revised: 05/23/2013 Contractor logistical support for workshops, achieving prior unfunded applications, application processing, field reading and slate preparation (14 weeks

- reading) $ 35,000 .00 Staff time for conducting supervised review. (4 weeks x 3 control reviews, and 3 panel chairpersons) ( 6 staff x 160 hours x $48 per hour=$ 46,080 ) (Overhead cost: $ 46,080 x 50 percent=$ 23,040 ) $ 69,120 .00 Staff time for generating slate (3 staff x $48 x 16 hours=$ 2304 ) (Overhead cost: $ 2304 x 50 percent = $ 1152 ) $ 3,456 .00 Staff time to review and approve funding recommendations (4 hours per grant award x 5 awards) ( 5 awards x 4 hours per award x $48 per hour = $ 960 (Overhead cost: $ 960 x 50 per cent = $ 480 ) $ 1440 .00 Staff time to generate, approve, and issue grant awards ( 2 hours per award x 5 awards= 10 hours) ($48 per hr x 10 hours = $ 480 ) (Overhead cost: $ 480 x 50 percent = $ 240 ) $ 720 .00 Total estimate cost to government (competitive year) $ 141,776 .00

**15. Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments. Generally,**  **adjustments in burden result from re -**  **estimating burden and/or from economic phenomenon outside of an agency’s control (e.g., correcting a burden estimate or an**  **organic increase in the s ize of the reporting universe). Program changes result from**  **a deliberate action that materially changes a collection of information and generally are result of new statute or an agency action (e.g., changing a form, revising**  **regulations, redefining the res pondent universe, etc.). Burden changes should be**  **disaggregated by type of change (i.e., adjustment, program change due to new statute, and/or program change due to agency discretion), type of collection (new,**  **revision, extension, reinstatement with change , reinstatement without change) and**  **include totals for**  **changes in burden hours , responses**  **and cost s**  **(if applicable) .**  There are no program changes or adjustments to this data collection **. 16.**  **For collections of information whose results will be published, outlin e plans for**  **tabulation and publication. Address any complex analytical techniques that will be used. Provide the time schedule for the entire project, including beginning and** 8

ICRAS and OMB Number: **ICR No. 1667.10 1855 -**  **0011** Revised: 05/23/2013 **ending dates of the collection of information, completion of report, publicatio n**  **dates, and other actions.** Results of collected information will not be published. **17. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval of the**  **information collection, explain the reasons that display would be inappropriate.** The Department will display on the form the expiration date for the OMB approval as required.
**18. Explain each exception to the certification statement identified in the Certification**  **of Paperwork Reduction Act.** There are no exceptions to the certification statem ent.