alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION





PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(SUBSECTIONS
      (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF


TITLE
      18,
      UNITED STATES CODE)





Pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
      undersigned officers of NutraCea, a California corporation (the "Company”), do
      hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of NutraCea on Form 10-Q
      for
      the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission (the "10-Q Report") that:





(1)  the
      10-Q
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  the
      information contained in the 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      NutraCea.





Dated:
                November 6, 2008
            NUTRACEA/s/
                Bradley EdsonBradley
                EdsonChief
                Executive Officer/s/
                Olga Hernandez-LonganOlga
                Hernandez-LonganChief
                Financial Officer
Exhibit






                                                                                                                                 


May 27, 2015


Thomas Wessel
22 Cliffwood St. 
Lenox, MA 01240
Dear Tom:
Reference is made herein to that certain offer letter between you and Flex Pharma, Inc. (the “Company”) dated December 23, 2014 (the “Offer Letter”). 
You acknowledge and agree that pursuant to your offer letter you were granted an option to purchase 163,136 shares of Common Stock of the Company (the “Option”) pursuant to that certain Stock Option Grant Notice and Agreement dated January 14, 2015 (the “Option Agreement”). The Offer Letter is hereby amended to provide that if within thirty (30) days prior to a Change in Control (as defined in the Offer Letter) or within twelve (12) months following a Change in Control, the Company or any successor thereto terminates your employment other than for Cause (as defined in the Offer Letter), or you terminate your employment for Good Reason (as defined in the Offer Letter), then the Company shall provide that all outstanding unvested equity awards granted to you shall become fully vested as of the date of such termination.
All other terms and provisions of the Offer Letter and the Option Agreement not expressly modified hereby shall remain in full force and effect.  This letter may not be modified or amended except by a written agreement signed by the Company and you.  
                 Sincerely,


                           Flex Pharma, Inc.        
/s/ John McCabe    
Name: John McCabe
Title: Vice President, Finance
Agreed to and accepted:


/s/ Thomas Wessel    
Thomas Wessel
§ 385.2005 Subscription and verification (Rule 2005). ( a ) *Subscription.* ( 1 ) Any filing with the Commission must be signed.
( 2 ) The signature on a filing constitutes a certificate that: ( i ) The signer has read the filing signed and knows its contents;
( ii ) The contents are true as stated, to the best knowledge and belief of the signer; and
( iii ) The signer possesses full power and authority to sign the filing.
( 3 ) A filing must be signed by: ( i ) The person on behalf of whom the filing is made;
( ii ) Any officer of the corporation, trust, association, or other organized group, on behalf of which the filing is made;
( iii ) Any officer, agent, or employee of the governmental authority, agency, or instrumentality on behalf of which the filing is made; or
( iv ) A representative qualified to practice before the Commission under Rule 2101 who possesses authority to sign.
( 4 ) The signer of any filing may be required to submit evidence of authority to sign the filing.
( b ) *Verification.* ( 1 ) The facts alleged in any filing need not be verified, unless verification is required by statute, rule, or order.
( 2 ) If verification of any filing is required, the verification must be under oath by a person having knowledge of the matters set forth in the filing. If any verification is made by a person other than the signer, a statement must be attached to the verification explaining why a person other than the signer provides verification.
( 3 ) Any requirement that a filing include or be supported by a sworn declaration, verification, certificate, statement, oath, or affidavit may be satisfied by compliance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 1746, provided that the filer, or an authorized representative of the filer, maintains a copy of the document bearing an original, physical signature until after such time as all administrative and judicial proceedings in the relevant matter are closed and all deadlines for further administrative or judicial review have passed.
( c ) *Electronic signature.* In the case of any document filed in electronic form under the provisions of this Chapter, the typed characters representing the name of a person shall be sufficient to show that such person has signed the document for purposes of this section.
[Order 225, 47 FR 19022, May 3, 1982, as amended by Order 619, 65 FR 57092, Sept. 21, 2000; Order 653, 70 FR 8724, Feb. 23, 2005]
§ 98.5 Health certificate. ( a ) Except as provided in subpart B of this part, an animal embryo shall not be imported into the United States unless it is accompanied by a certificate issued by a full-time salaried veterinary officer of the national government of the region of origin, or issued by a veterinarian designated or accredited by the national government of the region of origin and endorsed by a full-time salaried veterinary officer of the national government of the region of origin, representing that the veterinarian issuing the certificate was authorized to do so. The certificate shall state: ( 1 ) The dates, places, types, and results of all examinations and tests performed on the donor sire and donor dam as a condition for importation of the embryo, and the names and addresses of persons or laboratories conducting the examinations or tests, and a statement that any other requirements established by § 98.3 have been complied with,
( 2 ) The name and address of the consignor and consignee,
( 3 ) The name and address of the approved artificial insemination center where the semen for the embryo was collected, if applicable,
( 4 ) The name and address of the approved embryo transfer unit where the donor dam was inseminated or bred and the embryo was collected, and
( 5 ) The measures taken to ensure that the embryo was collected and maintained under conditions adequate to protect against contamination of the embryo with infectious animal disease organisms.
( b ) [Reserved]
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control numbers 0579-0040 and 0579-0453) [50 FR 43563, Oct. 25, 1985, as amended at 56 FR 55809, Oct. 30, 1991; 61 FR 15183, Apr. 5, 1996; 61 FR 17241, Apr. 19, 1996; 62 FR 56025, Oct. 28, 1997; 86 FR 68863, Dec. 3, 2021]
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 15

                    ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

Board of Directors
The MIIX Group, Incorporated

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8) of The MIIX Group, Incorporated, pertaining to the amended and
restated 1998 Long Term Incentive Equity Plan of The MIIX Group, Incorporated,
of our report dated May 8, 2002 relating to the unaudited consolidated interim
financial statements of The MIIX Group, Incorporated and subsidiaries included
in this Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2002.

                                        ERNST & YOUNG LLP

New York, New York
May 8, 2002
**Exhibit 23.01**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatement on Form S 8 (No. 333-151883, No. 333-143673, No. 333-116436, No.333-56741, No. 333-39946, No. 333-91408 and No. 333-106390) of UFPTechnologies, Inc., our report, dated March 30, 2010, relating to the 2009consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule, whichappears in this Form 10 K.

 

/s/ CCR LLP

 

Westborough, Massachusetts

March 30, 2010

 

----
#### § 33.9 [Reserved]
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Recognizes Top Commercial Lending Partners of 2020

WASHINGTON, Dec. 15, 2020 – United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Deputy Under Secretary

for Rural Development Bette Brand today announced that USDA partnered with 181 commercial lenders to 

invest $2.1 billion in rural communities and businesses in fiscal year (FY) 2020. Below is a list of USDA Rural 

Development’s top commercial lending partners during fiscal year FY 2020.

Live Oak Banking Company partnered with USDA to invest $345 million in rural communities during FY

2020. These investments helped 34 rural businesses acquire essential working capital through USDA’s Business 

and Industry (B&I) Loan Guarantee Program, 45 rural businesses take advantage of more efficient and 

renewable energy sources through USDA’s Rural Energy for America Loan Guarantee Program, five rural 

communities modernize their water and waste water infrastructure through USDA’s Water and Environmental 

Programs, and three rural communities build or modernize their local essential community facilities through 

USDA’s Community Facilities Loan Guarantee Program.

Greater Nevada Credit Union partnered with USDA to invest $295 million in rural communities during FY

2020. These investments helped 19 rural businesses acquire essential working capital through USDA’s Business 

and Industry (B&I) Loan Guarantee Program.

North Avenue Capital LLC partnered with USDA to invest $138 million in rural communities during FY

2020. These investments helped 24 rural businesses acquire essential working capital through USDA’s Business 

and Industry (B&I) Loan Guarantee Program.

Crestmark, a Division of Metabank, partnered with USDA to invest $122 million in rural communities during 

FY 2020. These investments helped seven rural businesses acquire essential working capital through USDA’s 

Business and Industry (B&I) Loan Guarantee Program, and 12 rural businesses take advantage of more efficient 

and renewable energy sources through USDA’s Rural Energy for America Loan Guarantee Program.

View a full list of USDA’s top FY 2020 commercial lending partners.

###

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender
No. 19,784.

#### Yale Popiel, d/b/a Big Four Taverns *v.*John M. Schooley, Manager of Safety and Excise, City and County of Denver.

(362 P. [2d] 863)

Decided June 12, 1961.

Rehearing denied July 3, 1961.

Mr. Walter L. Gerash, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Donald E. Kelley, Mr. Hans W. Johnson, for defendant in error.

*77
      *En Banc.*

Mr. Justice Moore

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Plaintiff in error, to whom we will refer as Popiel, was the holder of a hotel and liquor license at premises known as 1941 Champa street in Denver. Pursuant to notice required by law, a hearing was conducted before the defendant in error, to whom we will refer as the Manager of Safety, to determine whether said license should be suspended or revoked. Six alleged violations of the law were relied upon as warranting the suspension or revocation of said license. At the hearing extensive testimony was taken concerning each alleged violation. The Manager of Safety entered Findings and Conclusions in which he revoked the liquor license held by Popiel,.which order was upheld in.review proceedings instituted by Popiel in the district court. Popiel seeks review of that judgment by writ of error.

We have examined the.full record of proceedings before the Manager of Safety and have given consideration to the arguments advanced by counsel for Popiel. There was a wealth of evidence to support the findings of the Manager of .Safety. This being so, the contentions advanced in this court as grounds for reversal of the judgment do not warrant further discussion.

The judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Doyle not participating.
Together, America Prospers

Socially Disadvantaged Groups Grant

What does this 

program do? 

The primary objective of the 

SDGG program is to provide 

technical assistance to sociallydisadvantaged groups through 

cooperatives and Cooperative 

Development Centers. Each 

fiscal year, applications are 

requested through a Notice 

published in the Federal Register

and an announcement posted 

on Grants.gov.

Who may apply 

for this program?

Cooperatives and Cooperative 

Development Centers are eligible 

to apply for this program.

How may funds be used? 

Grant funds must be used to provide 

technical assistance to sociallydisadvantaged groups in rural areas. 

Examples of technical assistance are:

• Feasibility studies

• Business plans

• Strategic planning

• Leadership training

How do we get started? 

Before you apply:

• Request a Data Universal Number 

System (DUNS) number if your 

organization does not already have 

one. It should not take more than 

a few business days to get your 

number. However, you should plan on 

requesting it at least a month before 

the application deadline because 

you’ll need that number for the next 

pre-application step (see below).

• Register your organization with the 

System for Award Management 

(SAM) if you are not already 

registered. The registration is free, 

but you need to complete several 

steps. It’s a good idea to start the 

registration process at least a month 

before any application deadline. 

Before you start the registration 

process, we suggest reading 

through the HELP materials available 

on the SAM website. Then, you’ll 

need to create an account. After 

you create your account by setting 

up a user id and password, you can 

register your organization. Remember, 

you’ll need your DUNS number to 

complete your registration. Also, 

make a note of your CAGE code and 

expiration date because you’ll need 

those for your application.

Who can answer questions? 

• If you have questions, you can 

contact your nearest RD office.

NOTE: Because citations and other information may be subject to change, 

please contact your local office for assistance. You will find additional forms, 

resources, and program information at rd.usda.gov. USDA is an equal opportunity 

provider, employer, and lender.

Last Updated January 2020
#### § 1301.10 Preservation of records.

TVA will preserve all correspondence pertaining to the requests that it receives under this subpart, as well as copies of all requested records, until disposition or destruction is authorized pursuant to title 44 of the United States Code or the General Records Schedule 4.2 of the National Archives and Records Administration. TVA will not dispose of or destroy records while they are the subject of a pending request, appeal, or lawsuit under the FOIA.
0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

MING1 MINGW

Coarse_Ext

Sea_Salt_Ext

Fine_Soil_Ext

Elemental_Carbon_Ext

Organic_ext

Ammonium_Nitrate_Ext

Ammonium_Sulfate_Ext
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Aurizon Mines Ltd. (the Company) is filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, its annual report on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report).

I, David P. Hall, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ David P. Hall

David P. Hall
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

March 31, 2008
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 15


                    ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


Board of Directors
The MIIX Group, Incorporated

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8) of The MIIX Group, Incorporated, pertaining to the amended and
restated 1998 Long Term Incentive Equity Plan of The MIIX Group, Incorporated,
of our report dated November 8, 2002 relating to the unaudited consolidated
interim financial statements of The MIIX Group, Incorporated and subsidiaries
included in this Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002.

                                                    ERNST & YOUNG LLP


New York, New York
November 8, 2002
Exhibit






Exhibit 10(e)(iv)
SOUTH JERSEY INDUSTRIES, INC.
 
SCHEDULE OF OFFICER AGREEMENTS
 
Pursuant to Rule 12b-31, the following sets forth the material details which differ in the Officer Change in Control Agreements, the form of which is filed herewith as Exhibit 10(e)(iii).
 
	
					
	Name
	Capacities in Which Served
	Effective
 Date
 of
Agreement
	Severance
Multiple of
Base Salary
and Average
Annual Bonus
	Duration of Continued Medical
Insurance

	  
	  
	  
	  
	  

	Michael J. Renna
	Director, President and Chief Executive Officer, South Jersey Industries, Inc.
	1/1/13
	3X
	2 years

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Stephen H. Clark
	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, South Jersey Industries, Inc.
	1/1/13
	2X
	2 years

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Jeffrey E. DuBois
	Executive Vice President, South Jersey Industries, Inc.
	1/1/13
	2X
	2 years

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Gina M. Merritt-Epps
	Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, South Jersey Industries, Inc.
	1/1/13
	2X
	2 years

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Kathleen A. McEndy
	Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer, South Jersey Industries, Inc.
	1/1/13
	2X
	2 years

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Kenneth A. Lynch
	Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer, South Jersey Industries, Inc.
	1/1/13
	2X
	2 years

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	David Robbins, Jr.
	Senior Vice President, South Jersey Industries, Inc.
	1/1/13
	2X
	2 years

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Gregory M. Nuzzo
	Senior Vice President, South Jersey Industries, Inc.
	1/1/13
	2X
	2 years
§ 385.215 Amendment of pleadings and tariff or rate filings (Rule 215). ( a ) *General rules.* ( 1 ) Any participant, or any person who has filed a timely motion to intervene which has not been denied, may seek to modify its pleading by filing an amendment which conforms to the requirements applicable to the pleading to be amended.
( 2 ) A tariff or rate filing may be amended or modified only as provided in the regulations under this chapter. A tariff or rate filing may not be amended, except as allowed by statute. The procedures provided in this section do not apply to amendment of tariff or rate filings.
( 3 ) ( i ) If a written amendment is filed in a proceeding, or part of a proceeding, that is not set for hearing under subpart E, the amendment becomes effective as an amendment on the date filed.
( ii ) If a written amendment is filed in a proceeding, or part of a proceeding, which is set for hearing under subpart E, that amendment is effective on the date filed only if the amendment is filed more than five days before the earlier of either the first prehearing conference or the first day of evidentiary hearings.
( iii ) If, in a proceeding, or part of a proceeding, that is set for hearing under subpart E, a written amendment is filed after the time for filing provided under paragraph (a)(3)(ii) of this section, or if an oral amendment is made to a presiding officer during a hearing or conference, the amendment becomes effective as an amendment only as provided under paragraph (d) of this section.
( b ) *Answers.* Any participant, or any person who has filed a timely motion to intervene which has not been denied, may answer a written or oral amendment in accordance with Rule 213.
( c ) *Motion opposing an amendment.* Any participant, or any person who has filed a timely motion to intervene which has not been denied, may file a motion opposing the acceptance of any amendment, other than an amendment under paragraph (a)(3)(i) of this section, not later than 15 days after the filing of the amendment.
( d ) *Acceptance of amendments.* ( 1 ) An amendment becomes effective as an amendment at the end of 15 days from the date of filing, if no motion in opposition to the acceptance of an amendment under paragraph (a)(3)(iii) of this section is filed within the 15 day period.
( 2 ) If a motion in opposition to the acceptance of an amendment is filed within 15 days after the filing of the amendment, the amendment becomes effective as an amendment on the twentieth day after the filing of the amendment, except to the extent that the decisional authority, before such date, issues an order rejecting the amendment, wholly or in part, for good cause.
( e ) *Directed amendments.* A decisional authority, on motion or otherwise, may direct any participant, or any person seeking to be a party, to file a written amendment to amplify, clarify, or technically correct a pleading.
[Order 225, 47 FR 19022, May 3, 1982, as amended by Order 714, 73 FR 57538, Oct. 3, 2008]
#### § 376.203 Mailing address of Commission during emergency conditions.

The Chairman may direct that during the continuance of emergency conditions, communications, filings, reports, or other submittals to the Commission shall be addressed to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Official Mail and Messenger Service, United States Postal Service to such or other address as the Commission may designate.
# C_2010234EN.01004901.xml

| 28.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/49

---

Action brought on 25 June 2010 — Milux v OHMI (CHEMOCONTROL)

(Case T-285/10)

()

2010/C 234/87

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Milux Holding S.A. (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: J. Bojs, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 29 April 2010 in case R 1444/2009-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 29 April 2010 in case R 1444/2009-4;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘CHEMOCONTROL’ for goods and services in classes 9, 10 and 44

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the examiner: Refused the application for a Community trade mark

Decision of the examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal misapplied the principle of non-discrimination to the facts of this case; in the alternative, infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal erred in its conclusion that the trade mark applied for does not possess sufficient inherent distinctiveness.

Pleas in law:

---