alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 698 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 698

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide equitable 
 treatment for residents of Puerto Rico with respect to the refundable 
 portion of the child tax credit and to provide the same treatment to 
    families in Puerto Rico with one child or two children that is 
   currently provided to island families with three or more children.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 7, 2019

Mr. Menendez (for himself and Mr. Rubio) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide equitable 
 treatment for residents of Puerto Rico with respect to the refundable 
 portion of the child tax credit and to provide the same treatment to 
    families in Puerto Rico with one child or two children that is 
   currently provided to island families with three or more children.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Child Tax Credit Equity for Puerto 
Rico Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. EQUITABLE TREATMENT FOR RESIDENTS OF PUERTO RICO WITH RESPECT 
              TO THE REFUNDABLE PORTION OF THE CHILD TAX CREDIT.

    (a) In General.--The second sentence of section 24(d)(1) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting ``or section 
933'' after ``section 112''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2018.

SEC. 3. SAME TREATMENT OF FAMILIES IN PUERTO RICO WITH ONE CHILD OR TWO 
              CHILDREN THAT IS CURRENTLY PROVIDED TO ISLAND FAMILIES 
              WITH THREE OR MORE CHILDREN.

    (a) In General.--Section 24(d)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by adding at the end the following: ``In the case of an 
individual who is a bona fide resident of Puerto Rico during the entire 
taxable year, subparagraph (B)(ii) shall be applied by substituting `1 
or more qualifying children' for `3 or more qualifying children'.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2018.
                                 <all>
```
§ 367.2410 Account 241, Tax collections payable. ( a ) This account must include the amount of taxes collected by the service company through payroll deductions or otherwise pending transmittal of the taxes to the proper taxing authority.
( b ) Do not include liability for taxes assessed directly against the service company that is accounted for as part of the service company's own tax expense.
# C_2011089EN.01001201.xml

| 19.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/12

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Second Chamber (Italy) lodged on 24 January 2011 — Pioneer HI-Bred Italia Srl v Ministero delle Politiche Agricole e Forestali

(Case C-36/11)

2011/C 89/22

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato — Second Chamber

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Pioneer HI-Bred Italia Srl

Applicant:

Defendant: Ministero delle Politiche Agricole e Forestali

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Where a Member State has chosen to make authorisation to cultivate GMOs, even those listed in the European common catalogue, conditional upon compliance with appropriate general measures for ensuring coexistence with conventional and organic farming, must Article 26a of Directive 2001/18/EC, (1) read in the light of Recommendation 2003/556/EC (2) and subsequent Recommendation [2010/C 200/01], (3) be interpreted as meaning that, in the period preceding adoption of the general measures: (a) authorisation must be issued where the application concerns GMOs listed in the European common catalogue; or (b) consideration of the application for authorisation must be suspended until such time as the general measures have been adopted; or (c) authorisation must be issued, but coupled with appropriate requirements for preventing, in the specific case, contact — including unintended contact — between authorised GM crops and surrounding conventional or organic crops?

1

2

3

---

(1)  OJ 2001 L 106, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ 2003 L 189, p. 36.

2

(3)  OJ 2010 C 200, p. 1.

3

---
| (1)  | The Quarterly Report of the Company on      Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities      Exchange Act of 1934; and  |
|-----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)  | The information contained in the Report      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and      results of operations of the Company.  |
|-----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: November 9, 2009  |   /s/ Paul J. Maddon, M.D.,      Ph.D.                                                      |
|------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                         | Paul J. Maddon, M.D., Ph.D. Chief Executive Officer                                              |
|                         |                                                                                                       |
|                         |                                                                                                       |
|                         |   /s/ Robert A.      McKinney                                                               |
|                         | Robert A. McKinney Chief Financial Officer (Principal Finance and Accounting      Officer)  |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's February 29, 2000 Form 10-K and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000016918
<NAME> CANANDAIGUA BRANDS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-29-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-29-2000
<CASH>                                          34,308
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  291,108
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    615,700
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               995,997
<PP&E>                                         707,338
<DEPRECIATION>                                 164,367
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,348,791
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          438,217
<BONDS>                                      1,237,135
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           220
<OTHER-SE>                                     520,620
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,348,791
<SALES>                                      2,340,469
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,340,469
<CGS>                                        1,618,009
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,618,009
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             106,082
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                128,959
<INCOME-TAX>                                    51,584
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             77,375
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    77,375
<EPS-BASIC>                                       4.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     4.18


</TABLE>
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 736 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to clarify 

the authority of Congress and the States to regulate corporations, limited 

liability companies, and other corporate entities established by the laws 

of any State, the United States, or any foreign state. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 11, 2019 

Mr. TESTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States to clarify the authority of Congress and the States 

to regulate corporations, limited liability companies, and 

other corporate entities established by the laws of any 

State, the United States, or any foreign state. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the following article is proposed as an amendment 

4 to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 

5 valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitu6 tion when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of 

7 the several States: 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 736 IS

1 ‘‘ARTICLE— 

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. The rights enumerated in this Constitu3 tion and other rights retained by the people shall be the 

4 rights of natural persons. 

5 ‘‘SECTION 2. As used in this Constitution, the terms 

6 ‘people’, ‘person’, and ‘citizen’ shall not include a corpora7 tion, a limited liability company, or any other corporate 

8 entity established by the laws of any State, the United 

9 States, or any foreign state. 

10 ‘‘SECTION 3. A corporate entity described in section 

11 2 shall be subject to such regulation as the people, through 

12 representatives in Congress and State representatives, 

13 may determine reasonable, consistent with the powers of 

14 Congress and the States under this Constitution. 

15 ‘‘SECTION 4. Nothing in this Constitution shall be 

16 construed to limit the rights enumerated in this Constitu17 tion and other rights retained by the people, which are 

18 unalienable.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
### §690q. Termination

The program under this part shall terminate at the end of the second full fiscal year after the date that the Administrator establishes the program under this part.

(Pub. L. 85–699, title III, §398, as added Pub. L. 110–140, title XII, §1207, Dec. 19, 2007, 121 Stat. 1783.)
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 51 (Wednesday, March 16, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 14372]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5940]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Glenn/Colusa County Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Glenn/Colusa County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will 
meet in Willows, California. Agenda items covered include: (1) 
Introductions, (2) Approve Minutes, (3) RAC Admin Updates, (4) Public 
Comment, (5) New Project Proposals, (6) Project Updates FY 08, 09, 10, 
(7) Schedule Monitoring Field Trip, (8) General Discussion, (9) Meeting 
Schedule, (10) Adjourn.

DATES: The meeting will be held on March 21, 2011, from 1:30 p.m. and 
end at approximately 4:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Mendocino National Forest, 
Grindstone Ranger District Office, 825 N. Humboldt Ave., Willows, CA 
95988. Individuals who wish to speak or propose a project or agenda 
items contact Eduardo Olmedo, DFO, 825 N. Humboldt Ave., Willows, CA 
95988 or Laurie Pearson, Glenn/Colusa RAC Coordinator, USDA, Mendocino 
National Forest, Grindstone Ranger District, P.O. Box 160, Stonyford, 
CA 95979.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Laurie Pearson, Glenn/Colusa RAC Coordinator, USDA, Mendocino National 
Forest, Grindstone Ranger District, P.O. Box 160, Stonyford, CA 95979. 
(530) 963-3128. E-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9bd7d7cbfefae9e8f4f5dbfde8b5fdfeffb5eee8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0b47475b6e6a797864654b6d78256d6e6f257e78">[email protected]</span></a>.

Eduardo Olmedo, District Ranger, USDA, Mendocino National Forest, 
Grindstone Ranger District, 825 N. Humboldt St., Willows, CA 95988. 
(530) 934-3316. E-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cca9a3a0a1a9a8a38caabfe2aaa9a8e2b9bf"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6d080201000809022d0b1e430b080943181e">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public. 
Committee discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Committee 
members. However, persons who wish to bring matters to the attention of 
the Committee will file written statements with the Committee staff 
before or after the meeting. Public input sessions are provided and 
individuals who made written requests by March 10, 2011 have the 
opportunity to address the committee at those sessions.

    Dated: March 9, 2011.
Eduardo Olmedo,
Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 2011-5940 Filed 3-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,975
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  151,523
<ALLOWANCES>                                    23,029
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           5,923
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,626
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 147,833
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          109,786
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               49
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,080
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   147,833
<SALES>                                         32,317
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                33,422
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,977
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   719
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,019
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    707
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       707
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
        

</TABLE>
# C_2013260EN.01000802.xml

| 7.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 July 2013 — European Commission v French Republic

(Case C-520/11) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Decision 2009/726/EC - Non-compliance - Imports of milk and milk products - Origin - At-risk holdings in terms of cases of spongiform encephalopathies - National prohibitions)

2013/C 260/14

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: F. Jimeno Fernández and D. Bianchi, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: French Republic (represented by: G. de Bergues and S. Menez, and by C. Candat and R. Loosli-Surrans, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Arts 4(3) TEU and 288 TFEU — Failure to comply with Commission Decision 2009/726/EC of 24 September 2009 concerning interim protection measures taken by France as regards the introduction onto its territory of milk and milk products coming from a holding where a classical scrapie case is confirmed (OJ 2009 L 258, p. 27)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to comply with Commission Decision 2009/726/EC of 24 September 2009 concerning interim protection measures taken by France as regards the introduction onto its territory of milk and milk products coming from a holding where a classical scrapie case is confirmed, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 4(3) TEU and 288 TFEU. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to comply with Commission Decision 2009/726/EC of 24 September 2009 concerning interim protection measures taken by France as regards the introduction onto its territory of milk and milk products coming from a holding where a classical scrapie case is confirmed, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 4(3) TEU and 288 TFEU.

| 2. | The French Republic is ordered to pay costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The French Republic is ordered to pay costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 362, 10.12.2011.

1

---
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We have issued our report dated September 21, 2007, accompanying the
consolidated financial statements in the Annual Report of Gilman + Ciocia, Inc.
on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2006 and on Form 10-K and Form 10-K/A
for the year ended June 30, 2007. We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of said report in the Registration Statements of Gilman + Ciocia on
Forms S-8 (File No. 333-50089, effective April 14, 1998 and File No. 333-14915,
effective October 28, 1996).

                                                     SHERB & CO, LLP

New York, New York
October 5, 2007
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

08/15

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 15 Aug 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.41 N 76.30 W Meters AGL
# C_2012200EN.01000402.xml

| 7.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 200/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 200/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 May 2012 — European Commission v Republic of Austria

(Case C-352/11) (1)

1

(Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Environment - Directive 2008/1/EC - Integrated pollution prevention and control - Requirements for the granting of permits for existing installations - Obligation to ensure the operation of such installations in accordance with the requirements of that directive)

2012/C 200/07

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: G. Wilms and A. Alcover San Pedro, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Austria (represented by: C. Pesendorfer and A. Posch, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Infringement of Article 5(1) of Directive 2008/1/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 January 2008 concerning integrated pollution prevention and control (OJ 2008 L 24, p. 8) — Requirements for the granting of permits for existing installations — Obligation to ensure that those installations are operated in accordance with the requirements provided for under that directive

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by having failed to grant permits in accordance with Articles 6 and 8 of Directive 2008/1/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 January 2008 concerning integrated pollution prevention and control, to reconsider and, if necessary, renew existing permits, and to ensure that all existing installations are operated in accordance with the requirements of Articles 3, 7, 9, 10 and 13, 14(a) and (b) and Article 15(2) of that directive, the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 5(1) of that directive. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by having failed to grant permits in accordance with Articles 6 and 8 of Directive 2008/1/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 January 2008 concerning integrated pollution prevention and control, to reconsider and, if necessary, renew existing permits, and to ensure that all existing installations are operated in accordance with the requirements of Articles 3, 7, 9, 10 and 13, 14(a) and (b) and Article 15(2) of that directive, the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 5(1) of that directive.

| 2. | Orders the Republic of Austria to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Republic of Austria to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 252, 27.8.2011.

1

---