alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 367.28 Methods of allocation.

Indirect costs and compensation for use of capital must be allocated to projects in accordance with the service company's applicable and currently effective methods of allocation. Both direct and allocated indirect costs on projects must be assigned among those companies in the same manner. The cost accumulation system must identify the methods of allocation and the accounts to be charged. Companies must be notified in writing of any change in the methods of allocation.
### §2162. Rights and procedures

Each officer under consideration for removal under section 2159 of this title shall be—

(1) notified in writing at least thirty days before the hearing of the case by a board of inquiry of the reasons for which the officer is being required to show cause for retention;

(2) allowed reasonable time, as determined by the board of inquiry under regulations of the Secretary, to prepare his defense;

(3) allowed to appear in person and by counsel at proceedings before a board of inquiry; and

(4) allowed full access to, and furnished copies of, records relevant to the case at all stages of the proceeding, except that a board shall withhold any records that the Secretary determines should be withheld in the interests of national security. In any case where any records are withheld under this clause, the officer whose case is under consideration shall, to the extent that the national security permits, be furnished a summary of the records so withheld.

(Added Pub. L. 88–130, §1(10)(C), Sept. 24, 1963, 77 Stat. 188, §325; renumbered §2162 and amended Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §§112(b), 123(b)(2), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4216, 4240.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282, §123(b)(2), substituted "section 2159" for "section 322" in introductory provisions.

Pub. L. 115–282, §112(b), renumbered section 325 of this title as this section.
### §6909. Authorization

In addition to funds otherwise authorized to be appropriated to the Fund to carry out this title,1 there are authorized to be appropriated to the Administrator to carry out this chapter—

(1) $15,000,000 for fiscal year 2000;

(2) $15,000,000 for fiscal year 2001;

(3) $15,000,000 for fiscal year 2002; and

(4) $15,000,000 for fiscal year 2003.

(Pub. L. 103–325, title I, §180, as added Pub. L. 106–102, title VII, §725, Nov. 12, 1999, 113 Stat. 1474.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This title, referred to in text, is title I of Pub. L. 103–325, Sept. 23, 1994, 108 Stat. 2163. Subtitle A (§§101–121) of title I, known as the Community Development Banking and Financial Institutions Act of 1994, is classified principally to subchapter I (§4701 et seq.) of chapter 47 of Title 12, Banks and Banking. Subtitle B (§§151–158) of title I, known as the Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act of 1994, enacted sections 1639 and 1648 of this title, amended sections 1602, 1604, 1610, 1640, 1641, and 1647 of this title, and enacted provisions set out as notes under sections 1601 and 1602 of this title. Subtitle C (§§171–181) of title I, known as the Program for Investment in Microentrepreneurs Act of 1999 or PRIME Act, is classified generally to this chapter. For complete classification of title I of Pub. L. 103–325 to the Code, see Tables.

1 See References in Text note below.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           28836
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                  8000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      60771
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           18078
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             17688
<LOANS>                                         647212
<ALLOWANCE>                                       9400
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  787969
<DEPOSITS>                                      671018
<SHORT-TERM>                                     47056
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              10911
<LONG-TERM>                                       2100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          5559
<OTHER-SE>                                       51325
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  787969
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  14576
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 1092
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    88
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 15756
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                7050
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                7759
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             7997
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      750
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   6743
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   4616
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        3111
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      3111
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .46
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.82
<LOANS-NON>                                       2651
<LOANS-PAST>                                      2654
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    834
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  8717
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       93
<RECOVERIES>                                        26
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 9400
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              9400
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                           2250


</TABLE>
#### § 72.4 [Reserved]
#### § 559.1 Fish and other articles subject to administrative detention.

The provisions of 9 CFR 329.1 through 329.5 governing the administrative detention of carcasses, parts, meat, and meat food products of livestock apply also with respect to the carcasses, parts, and products of fish.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Terremark Worldwide, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jose A.
Segrera, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Dated:  June 14, 2004



                                                         /s/ JOSE A. SEGRERA
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Jose A. Segrera
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
# C_2006331EN.01000802.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 December 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic

(Case C-161/05) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 - Control system applicable to the common fisheries policy - Data concerning the species and quantities landed of fish - Failure to notify)

(2006/C 331/13)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: C. Cattabriga, Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: Italian Republic (represented by: I.M. Braguglia, Agent, G. Aiello and D. Del Grazio, lawyers)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Breach of Articles 15(4) and 18(1) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 of 12 October 1993 establishing a control system applicable to the common fisheries policy (OJ 1993 L 261, p. 1) — Failure to notify the data concerning the species and quantities of fish caught

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to notify the data referred to in Articles 15(4) and 18(1) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 of 12 October 1993 establishing a control system applicable to the common fisheries policy for 1999 and 2000, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under those provisions; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to notify the data referred to in Articles 15(4) and 18(1) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2847/93 of 12 October 1993 establishing a control system applicable to the common fisheries policy for 1999 and 2000, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under those provisions;

| 2. | Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 132, 28.5.2005.

1

---
# C_2010134EN.01004001.xml

| 22.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 134/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/40

---

Action brought on 8 March 2010 — Insula v Commission

(Case T-110/10)

2010/C 134/68

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Conseil scientifique international pour le développement des îles (Insula) (Paris, France) (represented by: J.-D. Simonet and P. Marsal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare the action to be admissible and well-founded; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare the action to be admissible and well-founded;

| — | Declare that the Commission's demand for repayment of a sum of EUR 84 120 is unfounded and, therefore, order the Commission to issue a credit note in the sum of EUR 84 120; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that the Commission's demand for repayment of a sum of EUR 84 120 is unfounded and, therefore, order the Commission to issue a credit note in the sum of EUR 84 120;

| — | Order that the action be joined to Case T-366/09, on account of the connection between them, for the purposes of the written and oral procedure; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order that the action be joined to Case T-366/09, on account of the connection between them, for the purposes of the written and oral procedure;

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

By the present action, based on an arbitration clause, the applicant requests the Court to declare that the debit note of 28 January 2010 by which the Commission, following an audit report from OLAF, demanded recovery of the advances paid to the applicant, does not comply with the terms of the EL HIERRO (NNE5/2001/950) contract concluded within the framework of a specific program for research, technological development and demonstration on energy, the environment and sustainable development.

The applicant puts forwards two pleas in law.

By the first plea in law, it challenges the enforceability of the debt claimed by the Commission following the audit carried out in 2005.

By the second plea in law, it claims that the Commission, by issuing the new debit note, is in breach of its contractual obligations which no longer entitle it to demand, six years after the last payment to Insula and without notification on its part in the period laid down by the contract, additional supporting documentary evidence.

---
### §1233. Violations and penalties

#### (a) Failure to affix required label

Any manufacturer of automobiles distributed in commerce who willfully fails to affix to any new automobile manufactured or imported by him the label required by section 1232 of this title shall be fined not more than $1,000. Such failure with respect to each automobile shall constitute a separate offense.

#### (b) Failure to endorse required label

Any manufacturer of automobiles distributed in commerce who willfully fails to endorse clearly, distinctly and legibly any label as required by section 1232 of this title, or who makes a false endorsement of any such label, shall be fined not more than $1,000. Such failure or false endorsement with respect to each automobile shall constitute a separate offense.

#### (c) Removal, alteration, or illegibility of required label

Any person who willfully removes, alters, or renders illegible any label affixed to a new automobile pursuant to section 1232 of this title, or any endorsement thereon, prior to the time that such automobile is delivered to the actual custody and possession of the ultimate purchaser of such new automobile, except where the manufacturer relabels the automobile in the event the same is rerouted, repurchased, or reacquired by the manufacturer of such automobile, shall be fined not more than $1,000, or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. Such removal, alteration, or rendering illegible with respect to each automobile shall constitute a separate offense.

(Pub. L. 85–506, §4, July 7, 1958, 72 Stat. 326.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the later of Oct. 1, 1958, or the first day of the introduction of any new model of automobile in any line of automobile beginning after July 7, 1958, see section 5 of Pub. L. 85–506, set out as a note under section 1231 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF L.A.T. SPORTSWEAR FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 28,
1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1996
<CASH>                                             938
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,184
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,585
<INVENTORY>                                     20,561
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,795
<PP&E>                                           7,388
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,073
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  36,519
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,107
<BONDS>                                         18,929
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,825
<OTHER-SE>                                         156
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    36,519
<SALES>                                         94,834
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                94,834
<CGS>                                           79,136
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   79,136
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   688
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,047
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,492)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       172
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,664)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,664)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.63)
        

</TABLE>
NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC.

Small Wind Site Assessor 

Guidelines Document

Presenter: Robert Preus

WINDExchange Webinar 

December 17, 2014

National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado

PR-5000-63406
2

The Small Wind Site Assessor Guidelines is...

• A guideline, not a manual

• Provides a framework for: 

o Required skills for small wind site assessment

o The necessary steps in developing an assessment

o Available resources for wind data and site 

conditions

o Results reporting expectations.
3

Background and Motivation for Document 

Small wind has a history of poor energy production 

estimates resulting from:

• Overly optimistic power curves 

o Solved with third-party verified power curves. 

• Insufficient adjustments to wind speed for site 

conditions 

o Small wind site assessor guidelines provide a complete 

set of potential adjustments to wind resource 

estimates to establish consistent expectations

o Guidelines also provide references to sources for 

processes that can be used when making wind resource 

adjustments and energy production estimates.
4

Content

• Assessor qualifications (skill set)

• Site evaluation and description (from site visit)

• Wind resource data and production estimates

• Site assessment report (with links to samples) 

• Glossary

• References

• Sample checklist

• Case studies.
5

Wind Data and Energy Production Estimates 

Guide provides more detail on the core activity 

of obtaining wind data and developing 

production estimates

• Wind data sources

• Adjustments for topography

• Wind shear adjustment

• Turbulence intensity

• Gross annual energy production estimate

• Net annual energy production estimate.
6

Timeline for Completion

• Out for final expert review (end of 2014)

• Incorporate review comments (January 2015)

• Send to communications (February 2015)

• Release (March 2015).
7

Contact and Funding

Robert Preus

Robert.preus@nrel.gov

303-384-7284

This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. GO28308 

with the National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Funding for the work was provided by the 

DOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Wind and Water Power Technologies 

Office.

Photo by Dennis Schroeder, NREL Image Gallery #19901
# C_2013114EN.01001501.xml

| 20.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 114/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 114/15

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 28 February 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Rheinland-Pfalz — Germany) — Helga Petersen, Peter Petersen v Finanzamt Ludwigshafen

(Case C-544/11) (1)

1

(Freedom to provide services - Freedom of movement for workers - Legislation of a Member State allowing exemption from taxation on income received for work carried out in another State in the context of development aid - Conditions - Establishment of the employer within the national territory - Refusal where the employer is established in another Member State)

2013/C 114/20

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Finanzgericht Rheinland-Pfalz

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Helga Petersen, Peter Petersen

Applicants:

Defendant: Finanzamt Ludwigshafen

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Finanzgericht Rheinland-Pfalz — Interpretation of Article 56 TFEU — Restrictions on the freedom to provide services within the European Union — Legislation of a Member State allowing exemption from taxation of income received for work carried out abroad in the context of development aid — Restriction of that exemption to situations where the employer is established within the national territory

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 45 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding national legislation of a Member State pursuant to which income received for employment activities by a taxpayer who is resident in that Member State and has unlimited tax liability is exempt from income tax if the employer is established in that Member State, but is not so exempt if that employer is established in another Member State.

---

(1)  OJ C 25, 28.1.2012.

1

---
----

| Delaware                                                          |   | 000-23143               |   | 13-3379479                       |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|----------------------------------|
| (State or other jurisdictionof incorporation)                     |   | (CommissionFile Number) |   | (IRS EmployerIdentification No.) |
|                                                              |   |                    |   |                             |
| 777 Old Saw Mill River Road, Tarrytown, New York                  |   | 10591                   |
| (Address of principal executive offices)                          |   | (Zip Code)              |
| Registrant's telephone number, including area code (914) 789-2800 |

----

| Item 8.01. | Other Events. |
|------------|---------------|
| Item 9.01. | Financial Statements and Exhibits. |
|------------|------------------------------------|
| (d)   | Exhibits |
|-----------------|----------|
| Exhibit No. | Description |
|-------------|-------------|
| 99.1 | Press Release dated February 6, 2014. |
|------|---------------------------------------|

----

|   | PROGENICS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. |
|--------|---------------------------------|
|   | By:                             | /s/ ANGELO W. LOVALLO, JR. |
|   |                            | Angelo W. Lovallo, Jr. |
|   |                            | Vice President - Finance & Treasurer |
|   |                            | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
MEMORANDUM

Date: May 22, 2013

To: Docket #EPA–HQ–OAR–2012–0580

RE: Call with Excellence Industries 

On May 22, 2013, EPA staff participated in a conference call with Excellence Industries. EPA 

participants were Cindy Newberg, Tom Land, Dave Godwin, Sally Hamlin, and Melissa Fiffer.

This conference call was about the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Protection of Stratospheric 

Ozone: Revision of the Venting Prohibition for Specific Refrigerant Substitutes (78 FR 

21871). Dell Dahl, President of Excellence Industries, asked about whether the proposal 

considered venting hydrocarbons indoors, use of explosion-proof recovery equipment in other 

countries, and the status of equipment standards from standard-setting bodies such as UL and 

AHRI.

EPA staff described the proposed rule and process for submitting comments.