alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION





I, Alice P. Frazier, Chief Financial Officer of Middleburg Financial Corporation, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Middleburg Financial Corporation;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



---



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  March 30, 2004



/s/ Alice P. Frazier



Alice P. Frazier

Chief Financial Officer
# C_2011340EN.01001901.xml

| 19.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 340/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/19

---

Judgment of the General Court of 6 October 2011 — Industrias Francisco Ivars v OHIM — Motive (Mechanical speed reducer)

(Case T-246/10) (1)

1

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing a mechanical speed reducer - Earlier Community design - Ground of invalidity - No individual character - Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)

2011/C 340/37

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Industrias Francisco Ivars, SL (Xeraco, Spain) (represented by: E. Caballero Oliver and A. Sanz-Bermell y Martínez, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Motive Srl (Montirone, Italy) (represented by: I. Valdelomar Serrano and J. Mora Granell, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 16 March 2010 (Case R 1337/2008-3) relating to invalidity proceedings between Motive Srl and Industrias Francisco Ivars, SL.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Industrias Francisco Ivars, SL to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Industrias Francisco Ivars, SL to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 195, 17.7.2010.

1

---
# Table 8 Taxa List
### §69c. False advertising and invoicing

(a) For the purposes of this subchapter, a fur product or fur shall be considered to be falsely or deceptively advertised if any advertisement, representation, public announcement, or notice which is intended to aid, promote, or assist directly or indirectly in the sale or offering for sale of such fur product or fur—

(1) does not show the name or names (as set forth in the Fur Products Name Guide) of the animal or animals that produced the fur, and such qualifying statement as may be required pursuant to section 69e(c) of this title;

(2) does not show that the fur is used fur or that the fur product contains used fur, when such is the fact;

(3) does not show that the fur product or fur is bleached, dyed, or otherwise artificially colored fur when such is the fact;

(4) does not show that the fur product is composed in whole or in substantial part of paws, tails, bellies, or waste fur, when such is the fact;

(5) contains the name or names of any animal or animals other than the name or names specified in paragraph (1) of this subsection, or contains any form of misrepresentation or deception, directly or by implication, with respect to such fur product or fur;

(6) does not show the name of the country of origin of any imported furs or those contained in a fur product.

(b) For the purposes of this subchapter, a fur product or fur shall be considered to be falsely or deceptively invoiced—

(1) if such fur product or fur is not invoiced to show—

(A) the name or names (as set forth in the Fur Products Name Guide) of the animal or animals that produced the fur, and such qualifying statement as may be required pursuant to section 69e(c) of this title;

(B) that the fur product contains or is composed of used fur, when such is the fact;

(C) that the fur product contains or is composed of bleached, dyed, or otherwise artificially colored fur, when such is the fact;

(D) that the fur product is composed in whole or in substantial part of paws, tails, bellies, or waste fur, when such is the fact;

(E) the name and address of the person issuing such invoice;

(F) the name of the country of origin of any imported furs or those contained in a fur product;

(2) if such invoice contains the name or names of any animal or animals other than the name or names specified in paragraph (1)(A) of this subsection, or contains any form of misrepresentation or deception, directly or by implication, with respect to such fur product or fur.

(Aug. 8, 1951, ch. 298, §5, 65 Stat. 178.)
§ 157.35 Undue discrimination or preference. ( a ) All binding open seasons shall be conducted without undue discrimination or preference in the rates, terms or conditions of service and all capacity allocated as a result of any open season shall be awarded without undue discrimination or preference of any kind.
( b ) Any complaint filed pursuant to § 385.206 of this chapter alleging non-compliance with any of the requirements of this subpart shall be processed under the Commission's Fast Track Processing procedures contained in § 385.206(h).
( c ) Each prospective applicant conducting an open season under this subpart must function independent of the other divisions of the prospective applicant as well as the prospective applicant's “affiliates” performing a “marketing function” as those terms are defined in § 358.3(a) and (c) of the Commission's regulations, except that the exemption in § 358.3(c)(2)(iii) shall not apply. In instances in which the prospective applicant is not an entity created specifically to conduct an open season under this subpart, the prospective applicant must create or designate a unit or division to conduct the open season that must function independent of the other divisions of the project applicant as well as the project applicant's “affiliates” performing a “marketing function” as those terms are defined in § 358.3(a) of this chapter, except that the exemption in 358.3(c)(2)(iii) shall not apply.
( d ) Each project applicant conducting an open season under this subpart that is not otherwise subject to the provisions of part 358 of this chapter must comply with the following sections of that part: §§ 358.4(c) and (d), 358.5, 358.6, 358.7(a), (b), and (c), and 358.8 (b) and (c) of this chapter.
[Order 2005, 70 FR 8286, Feb. 18, 2005, as amended by Order 2005-A, 70 FR 35026, June 16, 2005; 75 FR 15342, Mar. 29, 2010]
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We hereby consent to the incorporation of our report dated February 7, 2001,
with respect to our audit of the financial statements as of December 31, 2000
and for each of the years in the two-year period then ended of 3-Dimensional
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., included in this Form 10-K, into the Company's previously
filed Registration Statements on Form S-8, File Nos. 333-54890 and 333-61978.



/s/ Richard A. Eisner & Company, LLP

New York, New York
March 29, 2002
Exhibit 31.2



Rule 13a-14(a) Certification

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, John C. Farmer, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of MK Resources Company;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                   |  |                                      
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: May 16, 2005 |  | /s/ John C. Farmer                   
|                   |  | John C. Farmer                       
|                   |  | Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
START TALKING BEFORE SHE HEADS 

OFF TO SCHOOL.

It’s never too early to have a conversation about alcohol and 

other drugs.

The sooner you talk about the dangers of underage drinking and substance use, the 

greater chance you have of influencing your child’s decisions about using alcohol and 

other drugs. For tips on how—and when—to begin the conversation, visit 

www.underagedrinking.samhsa.gov

#TalkTheyHearYou PEP20-03-01-043
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7291

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RAYMOND THOMAS OECHSLE, JR., Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CR-94-57, CA-97-892-5-BO) Submitted: January 5, 1999 Decided: January 20, 1999 Before ERVIN, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Raymond Thomas Oechsle, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John Samuel Bowler, Assistant United States Attorney, Fenita Morris Shepard, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Raymond Thomas Oechsle, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Oechsle ,Nos. CR-94-57; CA-97-892-5-BO (E.D.N.C. June 10, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
PUBLIC LAW 113–271—DEC. 18, 2014 128 STAT. 2951 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5816: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 160 (2014): 

Dec. 10, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 15, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 113–271 

113th Congress 

An Act 

To extend the authorization for the United States Commission on International 

Religious Freedom. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. EXTENSION AND TERMINATION OF AUTHORITY. 

The International Religious Freedom Act of 1998 is amended— 

(1) in section 207(a) (22 U.S.C. 6435(a)), by striking ‘‘2014’’ 

and inserting ‘‘2015’’; and 

(2) in section 209 (22 U.S.C. 6436), by striking ‘‘September 

30, 2014’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2015’’. 

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

The amendments made by this Act shall take effect as if enacted 

on December 10, 2014. 

Approved December 18, 2014. 

22 USC 6435 

note. 

Dec. 18, 2014 

[H.R. 5816] 


srobinson on DSKB307YQ1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
### §§724 to 728. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections, acts May 12, 1933, ch. 30, §§4–8, 48 Stat. 56–58; Feb. 15, 1934, ch. 13, §1, 48 Stat. 351, were enacted as temporary legislation during the economic emergency in 1933.
#### § 367.23 Transactions with non-associate companies.

When a service or construction is performed for non-associate companies at an amount other than cost, the amount of revenues in excess or deficiency of the cost on servicing the non-associate companies must be charged to account 458.4, Excess or deficiency on servicing non-associate utility companies (§ 367.4584). A deficiency incurred in a project deemed beneficial to the associate companies may be charged to associate companies subject to disallowance by a State Commission or Federal Commission having jurisdiction over the rates or services of the associate companies. To the extent not charged, or if disallowed, the deficiency will be charged to account 458.4 (§ 367.4584). In computing charges to associate companies for any calendar year, any net credit in this account must be deducted from amounts reimbursable by associate companies as compensation for use of capital invested in the service company.
EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I, Philip
A. Baratelli, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of
Clarus Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on
Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Clarus Corporation.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 Date:  March 3,
      2009By:
                          /s/Philip A.
      BaratelliPhilip A.
      BaratelliChief
      Financial Officer
# C_2007056EN.01002102.xml

| 10.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 56/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 56/21

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Beroep te Gent (Belgium) lodged on 18 January 2007 — Hans Eckelkamp and Others v Belgian State

(Case C-11/07)

(2007/C 56/39)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hof van Beroep te Gent

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellants: Hans Eckelkamp and Others

Appellants:

Respondent: Belgian State

Respondent:

Question referred

Do Article 12 EC, in conjunction with Articles 17 EC and 18 EC, and Article 56 EC, in conjunction with Article 57 EC, preclude national rules of a Member State under which, in the context of the acquisition, through inheritance, of immovable property situate in a Member State (the State in which the property is situate), that State imposes a tax on the value of the immovable property situate in that State, in respect of which that State allows a deduction corresponding to the value of charges on that immovable property (such as debts secured by the right conferred on a creditor to take out a mortgage against that immovable property) if the testator, at the time of his demise, was resident in the State in which the property is situate, but not if the testator, at the time of his demise, was living in a different Member State (the State of residence)?

---
# C_2013108EN.01001804.xml

| 13.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/18

---

Order of the President of the Court of 21 January 2013 — European Commission v Italian Republic

(Case C-641/11) (1)

1

2013/C 108/40

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 58, 25.2.2012.

1

---
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32


      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Overhill Farms,
Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 28, 2004 (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certify in their capacities as Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: May 7, 2004                       By: /s/ James Rudis
                                            ------------------------------------
                                              James Rudis
                                              Chief Executive Officer
                                              (principal executive officer)


Dated: May 7, 2004                       By: /s/ John L. Steinbrun
                                            ------------------------------------
                                              John L. Steinbrun
                                              Chief Financial Officer
                                              (principal financial officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures
that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
§ 385.802 Noncontested proceedings (Rule 802). *Noncontested proceedings.* In any proceeding required by statute to be set for hearing, the Commission, when it appears to be in the public interest and to be in the interest of the parties to grant the relief or authority requested in the initial pleading, and to omit the intermediate decision procedure, may, after a hearing during which no opposition or contest develops, forthwith dispose of the proceedings upon consideration of the pleadings and other evidence filed and incorporated in the record: *Provided,* ( a ) The applicant or other initial pleader requests that the intermediate decision procedure be omitted and waives oral hearing and opportunity for filing exceptions to the decision of the Commission; and
( b ) no issue of substance is raised by any request to be heard, protest or petition filed subsequent to publication in the Federal Register of the notice of the filing of an initial pleading and notice or order fixing of hearing, which notice or order will state that the Commission considers the proceeding a proper one for disposition under the provisions of this subpart. Requests for the procedure provided by this subpart may be contained in the initial pleading or subsequent request in writing to the Commission. The decision of the Commission in such proceeding after noncontested hearing, will be final, subject to reconsideration by the Commission upon request for rehearing as provided by statute.