alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex10-3.htm


Exhibit 10.3


 


LEASE AGREEMENT


 


Dated August 27, 2015


 


This Lease is made by and between Mauricio Polito (hereinafter "Landlord") and Wike Corp. (hereinafter "Tenant"). In consideration for the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the parties hereby agree as follows:


 


1. The Landlord leases to the Tenant, and the Tenant rents from the Landlord the following described premise: 30 square meres located at Via Lodovico Berti, 40131, Bologna, Italy.


 


2. The term of the Lease shall be for one year commencing on September 17, 2015 and ending September 17, 2016. The Tenant pay to Landlord as rent $2400 per the year, in the event of monthly payment the amount for a mouth would be $200. The validity of this agreement can be expanded for longer period upon an oral agreement of the Landlord and the Tenant.


 


3. This Lease is subject to all present or future mortgages affecting the premises. Tenant shall use and occupy the premises only as a manufacturer subject at all times to the approval of the Landlord.


 


4. The Tenant shall not make any alterations, additions or improvements to the premises without the prior written consent of the Landlord.


 


5. The Landlord, at his own expense, shall furnish the following utilities or amenities for the benefit of the Tenant:


 


Empty space with working electricity sockets, clean, working facilities, without any background payment such as bills, checks etc.


 


6. The Tenant shall not permit or commit waste to the premises. The Tenant shall comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances codes and laws of all governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the premises.


 


7. The Tenant shall not permit or engage in any activity that will affect an increase in the rate of insurance for the Building in which the premises is contained nor shall the Tenant permit or commit any nuisance thereon.


 


8. The Tenant shall not sublet or assign the premises nor allow any other person or business to use or occupy the premises without the prior written consent of the Landlord, which consent may not be unreasonably withheld.


 


9. At the end of the term of this Lease, the Tenant shall surrender and deliver up the premises in the same condition (subject to any additions, alterations or improvements, if any) as presently exists, reasonable wear and tear excluded.


 


10. Upon default in any term or condition of this Lease, the Landlord shall have the right to undertake any or all other remedies permitted by Law.


 


11. This Lease shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, the parties, their heirs, successors, and assigns.


 


Authorized signatures:


 







 


/s/ Corina Safaler                                                                                            /s/ Mauricio Polito            


 


   Wike Corp.                                                                                                      Mauricio Polito
§ 292.306 Interconnection costs. ( a ) *Obligation to pay.* Each qualifying facility shall be obligated to pay any interconnection costs which the State regulatory authority (with respect to any electric utility over which it has ratemaking authority) or nonregulated electric utility may assess against the qualifying facility on a nondiscriminatory basis with respect to other customers with similar load characteristics.
( b ) *Reimbursement of interconnection costs.* Each State regulatory authority (with respect to any electric utility over which it has ratemaking authority) and nonregulated utility shall determine the manner for payments of interconnection costs, which may include reimbursement over a reasonable period of time.
### §73. Agreements involving restrictions in favor of imported goods

If any article produced in a foreign country is imported into the United States under any agreement, understanding, or condition that the importer thereof or any other person in the United States shall not use, purchase, or deal in, or shall be restricted in his using, purchasing, or dealing in, the articles of any other person, there shall be levied, collected, and paid thereon, in addition to the duty otherwise imposed by law, a special duty equal to double the amount of such duty: Provided, That the above shall not be interpreted to prevent the establishing in this country on the part of a foreign producer of an exclusive agency for the sale in the United States of the products of said foreign producer or merchant, nor to prevent such exclusive agent from agreeing not to use, purchase, or deal in the article of any other person, but this proviso shall not be construed to exempt from the provisions of this section any article imported by such exclusive agent if such agent is required by the foreign producer or if it is agreed between such agent and such foreign producer that any agreement, understanding or condition set out in this section shall be imposed by such agent upon the sale or other disposition of such article to any person in the United States.

(Sept. 8, 1916, ch. 463, title VIII, §802, 39 Stat. 799.)
#### § 367.2430 Account 243, Obligations under capital leases—Current.

This account must include the portion, due within one year, of the obligations recorded for the amounts applicable to leased property recorded as assets in account 101.1, Property under capital leases (§ 367.1011).
§ 1318.600 Purpose and scope. ( a ) The review of a proposed action undertaken in accordance with §§ 1318.200, 1318.300, and 1318.400 that potentially affects floodplains or wetlands must include a floodplain or wetlands evaluation that is consistent with Executive Order 11988 (Floodplain Management) and Executive Order 11990 (Protection of Wetlands) pertaining to floodplains or wetlands, respectively, as required by this section.
( b ) Floodplain evaluations must apply any existing Federal flood risk management standard to federally-funded projects.
( c ) A wetland evaluation under Executive Order 11990 is not required for the issuance of permits, licenses, or allocations to private parties for activities involving wetlands on non-Federal lands.
Exhibit 20.1


Creation Date Tue Apr  7, 1998  09:29 AM                            Page    1
CMB95B

From: The Chase Manhattan Bank

To:   Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.


                   MONTHLY CERTIFICATEHOLDER'S REPORT
                   ----------------------------------

Due Period 29 Beginning Date                     03/01/1998
Due Period 29 End Date                           03/31/1998
Determination Date                               04/10/1998
Remittance Date                                  04/15/1998


I.    Monthly Principal and Principal Carryover Shortfall to Certificateholders
      (Per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                  $ 18.3636551079

II.   Monthly Interest and Unpaid Interest to Certificateholders
      (Per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                   $ 1.2134882491

III.  Monthly Expenses Summary

      A. Servicing Fee Disbursement                                $ 307,683.68
      B. Cash Collateral Account Expense                                 $ 0.00
      C. Total Expenses paid
         (per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                $ 0.2056759724

IV.   Cash Collateral Account Deposit Amount                             $ 0.00

V.    Outstanding Advance Summary

      A. From Prior Period                                       $ 4,055,658.24
      B. From Current Period                                     $ 3,993,894.05
      C. Change in Amount Between Periods (Lines B - A)            $ -61,764.19

VI.   Pool Factor Information

      A. Certificate Principal Balance                         $ 341,749,066.94
      B. Initial Certificate Balance                         $ 1,495,963,171.74
      C. Pool Factor (Lines A / B)                               0.228447513546

VII.  Available Cash Collateral Account Information for Due Period

      A. Available Cash Collateral Amount                       $ 18,461,020.93
      B. Available Cash Collateral Amount Percentage            4.999999998917%

VIII. Required Cash Collateral Amount

      A. For the Current Collection Period                      $ 18,461,020.93
      B. For the Next Collection Period                         $ 17,087,453.35
### §719b. Definitions

As used in this chapter:

(1) the term "Alaska natural gas" means natural gas derived from the area of the State of Alaska generally known as the North Slope of Alaska, including the Continental Shelf thereof;

(2) the term "Commission" means the Federal Power Commission;

(3) the term "Secretary" means the Secretary of the Interior;

(4) the term "provision of law" means any provision of a Federal statute or rule, regulation, or order issued thereunder; and

(5) the term "approved transportation system" means the system for the transportation of Alaska natural gas designated by the President pursuant to section 719e(a) or 719f(b) of this title and approved by joint resolution of the Congress pursuant to section 719f of this title.

(Pub. L. 94–586, §4, Oct. 22, 1976, 90 Stat. 2904.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

The Federal Power Commission was terminated, and its functions, personnel, property, funds, etc., were transferred to the Secretary of Energy (except for certain functions which were transferred to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission) by sections 7151(b), 7171(a), 7172(a)(1), 7291, and 7293 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.
/**
* DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE.
* See the following change record for more information,
* https://www.drupal.org/node/2815083
* @preserve
**/

(function ($, Modernizr, Drupal) {
  function CollapsibleDetails(node) {
    this.$node = $(node);
    this.$node.data('details', this);

    var anchor = window.location.hash && window.location.hash !== '#' ? ', ' + window.location.hash : '';
    if (this.$node.find('.error' + anchor).length) {
      this.$node.attr('open', true);
    }

    this.setupSummary();

    this.setupLegend();
  }

  $.extend(CollapsibleDetails, {
    instances: []
  });

  $.extend(CollapsibleDetails.prototype, {
    setupSummary: function setupSummary() {
      this.$summary = $('<span class="summary"></span>');
      this.$node.on('summaryUpdated', $.proxy(this.onSummaryUpdated, this)).trigger('summaryUpdated');
    },
    setupLegend: function setupLegend() {
      var $legend = this.$node.find('> summary');

      $('<span class="details-summary-prefix visually-hidden"></span>').append(this.$node.attr('open') ? Drupal.t('Hide') : Drupal.t('Show')).prependTo($legend).after(document.createTextNode(' '));

      $('<a class="details-title"></a>').attr('href', '#' + this.$node.attr('id')).prepend($legend.contents()).appendTo($legend);

      $legend.append(this.$summary).on('click', $.proxy(this.onLegendClick, this));
    },
    onLegendClick: function onLegendClick(e) {
      this.toggle();
      e.preventDefault();
    },
    onSummaryUpdated: function onSummaryUpdated() {
      var text = $.trim(this.$node.drupalGetSummary());
      this.$summary.html(text ? ' (' + text + ')' : '');
    },
    toggle: function toggle() {
      var _this = this;

      var isOpen = !!this.$node.attr('open');
      var $summaryPrefix = this.$node.find('> summary span.details-summary-prefix');
      if (isOpen) {
        $summaryPrefix.html(Drupal.t('Show'));
      } else {
        $summaryPrefix.html(Drupal.t('Hide'));
      }

      setTimeout(function () {
        _this.$node.attr('open', !isOpen);
      }, 0);
    }
  });

  Drupal.behaviors.collapse = {
    attach: function attach(context) {
      if (Modernizr.details) {
        return;
      }
      var $collapsibleDetails = $(context).find('details').once('collapse').addClass('collapse-processed');
      if ($collapsibleDetails.length) {
        for (var i = 0; i < $collapsibleDetails.length; i++) {
          CollapsibleDetails.instances.push(new CollapsibleDetails($collapsibleDetails[i]));
        }
      }
    }
  };

  var handleFragmentLinkClickOrHashChange = function handleFragmentLinkClickOrHashChange(e, $target) {
    $target.parents('details').not('[open]').find('> summary').trigger('click');
  };

  $('body').on('formFragmentLinkClickOrHashChange.details', handleFragmentLinkClickOrHashChange);

  Drupal.CollapsibleDetails = CollapsibleDetails;
})(jQuery, Modernizr, Drupal);
#### § 35.8 Protests and interventions by interested parties.

Unless the notice issued by the Commission provides otherwise, any protest or intervention to a rate filing made pursuant to this part must be filed in accordance with §§ 385.211 and 385.214 of this chapter, on or before 21 days after the subject rate filing. A protest must state the basis for the objection. A protest will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make the protestant a party to the proceeding. A person wishing to become a party to the proceeding must file a motion to intervene.

[Order 612, 64 FR 72537, Dec. 28, 1999; 65 FR 18229, Apr. 7, 2000, as amended by Order 647, 69 FR 32438, June 10, 2004; Order 714, 73 FR 57531, Oct. 3, 2008]
(39 South. 741.)

No. 15,615.

#### TOWN OF MANY v. FRANKLIN.

(Dec. 4, 1905.)

Criminal Law — Appeal.

Litigation in all cases is limited to one appeal; i. e., an appeal from the court of first instance to the appellate court.

Judgments from the magistrate’s or mayor’s court are similarly limited as to appeals. See Case 15,614, 39 South. *W),*ante, p. 638, handed down this day.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

Appeal from Twelfth Judicial District Court, Parish of Sabine; John Bachman Lee, Judge.

R. K. Franklin was convicted of violating an ordinance of the town of Many, and appealed to the district court. From an order dismissing the prosecution, the town appeals.

Dismissed.

John Henry Boone, for appellant. Silas D. Ponder, for appellee.

BREAUX. C. J.

The defendant was prosecuted before the mayor’s court of the town of Many for selling liquor within the limits 'of the town.

He was found guilty by the mayor’s court, and a fine imposed of $50 and costs, or to work a stated number of days.

From this sentence and judgment he prosecuted an appeal in the district court, and in that court filed pleas in his défense.

One of these pleas the court sustained, and ruled that the charter of the town authorized and did not prohibit the sale of intoxicants, and that the council could only pass such ordinances as the charter authorized. The motion to dismiss the prosecution presenting these grounds was sustained.

*335The town of Many, plaintiff, moved for an appeal, which was granted.

The plaintiff and appellant cannot have two hearings.

The appeal cannot move from the mayor’s or magistrate’s court to the district court, and from the district court to this court.

We have considered the question in the opinion on the motion to dismiss the appeal in the case bearing the same title (No. 15,614) this day handed down. Town of Many v. R. K. Franklin, 39 South. 740.1 We would not in any case feel justified in recognizing the right to two appeals, in the presence of constitutional provisions which limit remedies to one appeal.

For reasons assigned in the case of Many v. Franklin (No. 15,614) 39 South. 740,1 this day handed down, we dismiss the appeal.

1

 Ante, p. 638.
```
**CERTIFICATION**

I, Timothy Novak certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10QSB of Surgical Safety
   Products, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
   statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
   make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
   statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
   this annual report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
   information included in the this annual report, fairly present in all
   material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
   flows of the registrant as of, and for the periods presented in this annual
   report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
   establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures for the
   registrant and have:
        a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
           material information relating to the registrant, including the
           consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
           entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report
           is being prepared;
        b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
           and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing of this
           annual report; and
        c. Presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
           effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
           evaluation noted preceding;
5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
   our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors:
        a. All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
           controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
           record, process, summarize, and report financial data and have
           identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
           internal controls; and
        b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
           employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
           controls; and
6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
   annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls
   or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
   subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
   corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
   weaknesses.

Date: October 7, 2003

                                                /s/      Timothy Novak
                                                By:      Timothy Novak
                                                Title:   Chief Executive Officer
```
### §78j–4. Recovery of erroneously awarded compensation policy

#### (a) Listing standards

The Commission shall, by rule, direct the national securities exchanges and national securities associations to prohibit the listing of any security of an issuer that does not comply with the requirements of this section.

#### (b) Recovery of funds

The rules of the Commission under subsection (a) shall require each issuer to develop and implement a policy providing—

(1) for disclosure of the policy of the issuer on incentive-based compensation that is based on financial information required to be reported under the securities laws; and

(2) that, in the event that the issuer is required to prepare an accounting restatement due to the material noncompliance of the issuer with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws, the issuer will recover from any current or former executive officer of the issuer who received incentive-based compensation (including stock options awarded as compensation) during the 3-year period preceding the date on which the issuer is required to prepare an accounting restatement, based on the erroneous data, in 1 excess of what would have been paid to the executive officer under the accounting restatement.

(June 6, 1934, ch. 404, title I, §10D, as added Pub. L. 111–203, title IX, §954, July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 1904.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 1 day after July 21, 2010, except as otherwise provided, see section 4 of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as a note under section 5301 of Title 12, Banks and Banking.

1 So in original. Probably should be "compensation in".
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 44 (Monday, March 7, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 12342]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5055]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Notice of Availability of Record of Decision for the Final 
Environmental Impact Statement/Overseas Environmental Impact Statement 
for Gulf of Mexico Range Complex

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy (Navy), after carefully weighing 
the operational and environmental consequences of the proposed action, 
announces its decision to conduct Navy Atlantic Fleet training; 
research, development, testing, and evaluation (RDT&E) activities; and 
associated range capabilities enhancements in the Corpus Christi, New 
Orleans, Pensacola, and Panama City Operating Areas (OPAREAs) and 
associated airspace, land and overland components, hereafter referred 
to as the Gulf of Mexico (GOMEX) Range Complex. Title 10, United States 
Code (U.S.C.) Part 5062 directs the Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) to 
train all naval forces for combat. The CNO meets that direction, in 
part, by conducting at-sea training exercises and ensuring naval forces 
have access to ranges, OPAREAs and airspace where the Navy can develop 
and maintain skills for wartime missions and conduct RDT&E of naval 
weapons systems. The proposed action will be accomplished as set forth 
in Alternative 2, described in the Final Environmental Impact Statement 
(EIS)/Overseas Environmental Impact Statement (OEIS) as the Preferred 
Alternative. The purpose for the proposed action is to: (1) Achieve and 
maintain Fleet readiness using the GOMEX Range Complex to support and 
conduct current, emerging, and future training and RDT&E; (2) Expand 
warfare missions supported by the GOMEX Range Complex; and (3) Upgrade 
and modernize existing range capabilities to enhance and sustain Navy 
training and RDT&E. The need for the proposed action is to provide 
range capabilities for training and equipping combat-capable naval 
forces ready to deploy worldwide.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Record of Decision (ROD) has been 
distributed to all individuals who requested a copy of the Final EIS/
OEIS and to agencies and organizations that received a copy of the 
Final EIS/OEIS. The complete text of the ROD is available for public 
viewing on the project Web site at http://www.gomexrangecomplexeis.com/
, along with copies of the Final EIS/OEIS and supporting documents. 
Single copies of the ROD will be made available upon request by 
contacting: Ms. Nora Gluch, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, 
Atlantic, 6506 Hampton Boulevard, Norfolk, Virginia 23508-1278; 
telephone: 757-322-4769.

    Dated: March 1, 2011.
D.J. Werner,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-5055 Filed 3-4-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P