alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[113th Congress Public Law 294]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 128 STAT. 4009]]

Public Law 113-294
113th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To amend title 49, United States Code, to provide for limitations on the 
      fees charged to passengers of air carriers. <<NOTE: Dec. 19, 
                         2014 -  [H.R. 5462]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON FEES CHARGED TO PASSENGERS OF AIR 
                              CARRIERS.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (c) of section 44940 of title 49, United 
States Code, is amended to read as follows:
    ``(c) Limitation on Fee.--
            ``(1) Amount.--Fees imposed under subsection (a)(1) shall be 
        $5.60 per one-way trip in air transportation or intrastate air 
        transportation that originates at an airport in the United 
        States, except that the fee imposed per round trip shall not 
        exceed $11.20.
            ``(2) Definition of round trip.--In this subsection, the 
        term `round trip' means a trip on an air travel itinerary that 
        terminates or has a stopover at the origin point (or co-
        terminal).''.

    (b) <<NOTE: 49 USC 44940 note.>> Applicability.--The amendment made 
by subsection (a) shall apply with respect to a trip in air 
transportation or intrastate air transportation that is purchased on or 
after the date of the enactment of this Act.

    Approved December 19, 2014.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5462:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 160 (2014):
            Sept. 16, 17, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 4, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
#### § 1304.11 Little Tennessee River; date of formal submission.

As regards structures on the Little Tennessee River, applications are deemed by TVA to be formally submitted within the meaning of section 26a of the Act, on that date upon which applicant has complied in good faith with all applicable provisions of § 1304.2.
# 

# SAMPLE MEDIA ALERT

**[PRINT ON PROGRAM LETTERHEAD OR NATIONAL PREVENTION WEEK LETTERHEAD, OR INSERT PROGRAM LOGO HERE]**

**FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:** [DISTRIBUTION DATE] 

**CONTACT:** [NAME OF PRESS CONTACT] [PHONE NUMBER], [EMAIL] 

## **MEDIA ALERT**

### [ORGANIZATION NAME] TO HOST [EVENT] ON [DATE]

**[CITY, State]** — On [DATE], [ORGANIZATION NAME] will invite media and the public to attend [EVENT OR ACTIVITY NAME] to [BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF EVENT PURPOSE]. The event is being held in observance of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration’s (SAMHSA) National Prevention Week 2024.

To raise awareness about the importance of substance misuse prevention and mental health promotion, [ORGANIZATION NAME] is hosting [EVENT OR ACTIVITY NAME] to [DESCRIBE HOW THE EVENT WILL SERVE THE COMMUNITY—EDUCATE, SHOWCASE LOCAL RESOURCES, ETC.]. 

**WHAT:** 	[NAME OF EVENT OR ACTIVITY]

**WHEN:**[DATE AND ANY KEY TIMES, IF APPLICABLE]

**WHO:**[NAME, TITLE, AND ORGANIZATION OF THE PEOPLE WHO WILL SPEAK OR WHO ARE AVAILABLE FOR INTERVIEWS. USE A BULLETED LIST IF MORE THAN ONE PERSON.]

**WHERE:**[ADDRESS OF EVENT OR ACTIVITY]

Each year, SAMHSA’s National Prevention Week showcases the work of communities and organizations across the country dedicated to raising awareness about the importance of substance misuse prevention and positive mental health. National Prevention Week celebrates these year-round initiatives, and the possibilities prevention brings. This year, National Prevention Week [took place/will take place] May 12–18, 2024.

To register for [EVENT OR ACTIVITY NAME], visit [LINK]. [EVENT OR ACTIVITY NAME]****is free to the public; no registration is necessary. To accommodate in-person interviews, media interested in attending are asked to contact [NAME OF PRESS CONTACT] at [EMAIL] or [PHONE].

If you would like more information about [ORGANIZATION], visit [LINK].****

+++

[SHORT DESCRIPTION OF YOUR ORGANIZATION: WHAT IT IS, WHEN IT WAS ESTABLISHED, HOW IT IS FUNDED, WHY IT EXISTS, WHOM IT HELPS, AND ITS GEOGRAPHICAL SERVICE AREA]

# image1.jpeg
**Exhibit 99.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION BY CEO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofInformation Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period endedMarch 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Mason P. Slaine, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Mason P.  Slaine                   |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                                   |   |
| Mason P. Slaine                        |
| President and  Chief Executive Officer |
| May 14, 2003                           |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
**EXHIBIT 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-63699, No. 333-67535, No. 333-89551, No. 333-89505, No. 333-35996 and No. 333-125881) and Form S-3 (No. 333-100701, No. 333-60877 and No. 333-30497) of C&F FinancialCorporation and Subsidiary of our report, dated February 26, 2008, relating to the audits of the consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, included in and incorporated by reference in the Annual Report onForm 10-K of C&F Financial Corporation and Subsidiary for the year ended December 31, 2007. 

/s/ Yount, Hyde & Barbour, P.C. 

Winchester, Virginia 

March 7, 2008
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and
Investor Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted), J. William
Freytag, the Chief Executive Officer of Myogen, Inc. (the "Company"), and J.
William Turner, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

      1.    The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2004, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the
"Periodic Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2.    The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the
period covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company
for the periods covered by the Periodic Report.

Dated: August 9, 2004

/s/ J. William Freytag                             /s/ Joseph L. Turner
---------------------------------                  -----------------------------
J. William Freytag                                 Joseph L. Turner
Chief Executive Officer                            Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)                      (Principal Financial Officer)

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Myogen, Inc. and will be retained by Myogen, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") or its staff upon request.
This certification "accompanies" the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not
deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any
filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the
date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing.
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Banner
Holding Corp. for the quarter ended July 31,2002, I, John M. O'Keefe, President,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Banner Holding Corp.
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:

(1) such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended July 31, 2002,
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
quarter ended July 31, 2002, fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Banner Holding Corp.

                                           By:  John M. O'Keefe, Sr.
                                            /s/ John M. O'Keefe
                                            ------------------------
                                            President, Chief Executive Officer
                                            And Chief Financial Officer
5600 Fishers Lane • Rockville, MD 20857

www.samhsa.gov • 1-877-SAMHSA-7 (1-877-726-4727)

∙

Behavioral Health is Essential to Health • Prevention Works • Treatment is Effective • People Recover

October 13, 2023

Dear Tribal Leader:

This letter serves as an invitation to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ 

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) virtual Tribal 

Consultation on the Tribal Opioid Response (TOR) grant program. Before any action is taken

that will significantly affect Indian Tribes, it is the policy of SAMHSA to consult with Indian 

Tribes to the extent practicable and permitted by law. The Tribal Consultation session 

provides an opportunity for government-to-government dialogue.

Since the program’s inception in fiscal year (FY) 2018, SAMHSA has utilized user population 

estimates from the Indian Health Service (IHS) as the basis for determining grant award amounts 

for the TOR grant program. SAMHSA is specifically seeking feedback and recommendations on 

the funding methodology of the TOR grant program for FY 2024. 

• Should SAMHSA continue to utilize IHS user population estimates as the basis for

determining TOR grant award amounts? If so, what tiers of funding should be

established?

• Should SAMHSA award each TOR grant recipient the same amount, similar to other

SAMHSA discretionary Tribal grant programs?

• What other methodologies should be considered instead of or in addition to the above?

The virtual Tribal Consultation will be held on November 9, 2023, at 2:00 PM ET. You can 

register for the Tribal Consultation at: 

https://www.zoomgov.com/meeting/register/vJItdu6qpzsoH6xCvLzSWzOWOK3ENOV2iWQ

SAMHSA will accept written comments from Tribes until 5:00 PM ET on November 23, 2023. 

Comments can be emailed to otap@samhsa.hhs.gov.

SAMHSA looks forward to your participation and ongoing partnership. Please contact CAPT 

Karen Hearod, Director, Office of Tribal Affairs and Policy, at 202-868-9931 or 

otap@samhsa.hhs.gov with any questions.

Sincerely,

/Miriam E. Delphin-Rittmon, Ph.D./

Miriam E. Delphin-Rittmon, Ph.D. 

Assistant Secretary for Mental Health 

and Substance Use
§ 104.8 Illegal shipments. ( a ) Biological products which are presented for importation without a permit having been issued shall be returned to the country of origin at the expense of the importer or in lieu thereof, destroyed by Department personnel.
( b ) Biological products for Distribution and Sale presented for importation under a permit and found to be worthless, contaminated, dangerous, or harmful shall, within a period of 30 days after such finding, be returned to the country of origin at the expense of the importer or in lieu thereof, destroyed by Department personnel: *Provided,* That such product shall not be returned to the country of origin while bearing a U.S. permit number on the label.
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T21:19:41-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Advisory Committee for Cyberinfrastructure (25150).                    

*Date and Time:*                         April 1, 2011, 2 p.m.-4 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         Teleconference, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Room 1160, Arlington, VA 22230.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Open.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Kristen Oberright, Office of the Director, Office of Cyberinfrastructure (OD/OCI), National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Suite 1145, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone: 703-292-8970.                    

*Minutes:*                         May be obtained from the contact person listed above.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To advise NSF on the impact of its policies, programs and activities on the CI community. To provide advice to the Director/NSF on issues related to long-range planning, and to form ad hoc subcommittees to carry out needed studies and tasks.                    

*Agenda:*                         Discussion to approve taskforce reports.                    

Dated: March 10, 2011.

Susanne Bolton,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2011-6069 Filed 3-15-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
#### § 20.2 Regulation of issuance of securities.

The licensee or other person issuing or proposing to issue any security subjected to this section by or pursuant to [§ 20.1](/on/2024-07-29/title-18/section-20.1), shall be subject to and shall comply with the same requirements as the Commission would administer to it if it were a public utility issuing the security within the meaning and subject to the requirements of section 204 of the Act and [part 34 of this subchapter](/on/2024-07-29/title-18/part-34).

Cross Reference:

For applications for authorization of the issuance of securities or the assumption of liabilities, see [part 34 of this chapter](/on/2024-07-29/title-18/part-34).
§ 701.304 Procedures for identification of individuals making requests. ( a ) Each individual requesting the disclosure of a record or copy of a record will furnish the following information with his or her request: ( 1 ) The name of the record system containing the record;
( 2 ) Proof as described in paragraph (b) of this section that he or she is the individual to whom the requested record relates; and
( 3 ) Any other information required by the notice describing the record system.
( b ) Proof of identity as required by paragraph (a)(2) of this section will be provided as described in paragraph (b)(1) and (2) of this section. Requests made by an agent, parent, or guardian will include the authorization described in § 701.310(a) and (b). ( 1 ) Requests made in writing will include a statement, signed by the individual and properly notarized, that he or she appeared before a notary public and submitted proof of identification in the form of a drivers license, birth certificate, passport or other identification acceptable to the notary public. In any case in which, because of the extreme sensitivity of the record sought to be seen or copied, the agency determines that the identification is not adequate, it may request the individual to submit additional proof of identification.
( 2 ) If the request is made in person, the requester will submit proof of identification similar to that described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, acceptable to the Council.
[41 FR 8343, Feb. 26, 1976]
#### Christie *vs.*Griffing.

This court will not, in the exercise of its discretion, entertain a motion to dissolve an injunction upon bill and answer merely, where the complainant’s right is supported by evidence before the court, or within its control, regularly taken in the cause, and on which the complainant intends *to*rely, on the final hearing.

This suit is brought to restrain the defendant from violating an agreement, which the complainant alleges was made between them. On the filing of the bill and its accompanying affidavits, an injunction was ordered. The defendant answered, denying the agreement. Eeplication was filed, and the parties have proceeded to take testimony. The proof on the part of the complainant is all in. The defendant now moves to dissolve the injunction, on the bill and answer alone.

*Mr. A. 8. Jackson,*for the motion.

*Mr. Linn,*contra.

The Chancellor.

This case is, in its nature, one in which the court would be loth to dissolve the injunction on the mere denial of the complainant’s equity, by the defendant, in his answer. I am, therefore, the more unwilling to entertain this motion, at this stage of the cause. Were I to do so, and dissolve the injunction on the allegations of .the parties, as contained in the pleadings, I might, on the hearing, conclude, upon the *77evidence, that I ought to renew it and make it absolute. I, therefore, will not disturb it until the cause shall have been heard.

The great question of the cause is one of fact, whether the agreement was made or not. The complainant insists that the evidence taken on his part substantiates ins statements, and will, on the hearing, entitle him to the relief he seeks. The defendant, whose testimony is not in, is, very naturally, unwilling to go to a hearing without his proofs, and is not willing that the testimony taken by the complainant should be used on this motion.

In *Orr*v. *Littlefield,*1 *Woodb. & M.*13, it was held that, in the exercise of its discretion, the court will not dissolve an injunction where auxiliary evidence of complainant’s right is before the court, sufficient to sustain the bill, even though its material averments be denied by the answer. Surely, in the exercise of its discretion, the court will not, in a case like this, entertain a motion to dissolve upon bill and answer merely, where the complainant’s right is supported by evidence before the court, or within its control, regularly taken in the cause, and on which the complainant intends to rely on the final hearing. It will rather order the injunction to stand till the hearing.

The motion is denied. The injunction will be retained until the final hearing of the cause. Under the circumstances of this case, the defendant ought not to be required to pay the costs of this motion. They will abide the event of the suit.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

              Consent Of Independent Certified Public Accountants


Advanced Nutraceuticals, Inc.
(Formerly Nutrition for Life International, Inc.)
Houston, Texas

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement of Advanced Nutraceuticals, Inc. (the successor issuer to Nutrition
For Life International, Inc.) on Form S-8 (File No. 33-99366) of our report
dated December 29, 1998 relating to the consolidated financial statements of
Advanced Nutraceuticals, Inc. (formerly Nutrition for Life International, Inc.)
appearing in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended
September 30, 2000.

                                   BDO Seidman, LLP
Houston, Texas
April 17, 2001
MICHAEL STEVE COX,

Petitioner,
vs. THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WHITE PINE, Respondent. MICHAEL STEVE COX, Petitioner,
vs. THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WHITE PINE, Respondent. No. 62079

No. 62080



### ORDER DENYING WRIT PETITIONS These are seven original proper person petitions for extraordinary relief. The petitions are not consolidated.

Having considered these petitions and supporting documents, we conclude that petitioner's arguments lack merit and that our intervention by way of extraordinary relief is not warranted. Accordingly, we deny the petitions. NRAP 21(b)(1); NRAP 21(c).

Additionally, as demonstrated by the this order, petitioner has filed numerous meritless proper person petitions in this court seeking extraordinary writ relief and has further filed a number of similarly meritless appeals in this court. 

### See Cox v. McDaniel, Docket No. 60056, 

### Cox v. McDaniel, Docket No. 60151, 

### Cox v. Bannister, Docket No. 60637, 

### Cox v. State, Docket No. 61322. We caution appellant that continued filing of such meritless petitions and appeals may result in restrictions on his ability to file papers in this court in forma pauperis. 

### See Jordan v. State, Dept. of Motor Vehicles & Pub. Safety, 121 Nev. 44, 110 P.3d 30 (2005),

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) I947A • 2abrogated on other grounds by Buzz Stew, LLC v. City of N. Las Vegas, 124

Nev. 224, 181 P.3d 670 (2008).

It is so ORDERED.'

" 7114 -'t Hardesty

Parraguirre

Hon. James Todd Russell, District Judge Michael Steve Cox Attorney General/Carson City Carson City Clerk White Pine County Clerk Eighth District Court Clerk

'In each of these writ petitions, this court has received petitioner's requests for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We direct the clerk of this court to file the May 17, 2011, and the June 28, 2011, motions in Docket No. 58292; the March 19, 2012, motion in Docket No. 60404; the March 19, 2012, motion in Docket No. 60406; the March 19, 2012, motion in Docket No. 60407; the March 19, 2012, motion in Docket No. 60409; the November 20, 2012, motion in Docket No. 62079; and the November 20, 2012, motion in Docket No. 62080. Because petitioner was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in each of these writ petitions, no action is required on these motions. CC:

3