alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 212 (Wednesday, November 2, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67759-67760]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-28314]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Ocean Energy Management

Notice on Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Lease Sales

AGENCY: Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), Interior.

[[Page 67760]]

ACTION: List of Restricted Joint Bidders.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authority vested in the Director of the Bureau 
of Ocean Energy Management by the joint bidding provisions of 30 CFR 
256.41, each entity within one of the following groups shall be 
restricted from bidding with any entity in any other of the following 
groups at Outer Continental Shelf oil and gas lease sales to be held 
during the bidding period November 1, 2011, through April 30, 2012. The 
List of Restricted Joint Bidders published in the Federal Register on 
May 17, 2011, covered the period May 1, 2011, through October 31, 2011.

Group I
    Exxon Mobil Corporation
    ExxonMobil Exploration Company
     Group II
    Shell Oil Company
    Shell Offshore Inc.
    SWEPI LP
    Shell Frontier Oil & Gas Inc.
    SOI Finance Inc.
    Shell Gulf of Mexico Inc.
Group III
    BP America Production Company
    BP Exploration & Production Inc.
    BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc.
     Group IV
    Chevron Corporation
    Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
    Chevron Midcontinent, L.P.
    Unocal Corporation
    Union Oil Company of California
    Pure Partners, L.P.
Group V
    ConocoPhillips Company
    ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc.
    Phillips Pt. Arguello Production Company
    Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Company LP
    Burlington Resources Offshore Inc.
    The Louisiana Land and Exploration Company
    Inexeco Oil Company
Group VI
    Eni Petroleum Co. Inc.
    Eni Petroleum US LLC
    Eni Oil US LLC
    Eni Marketing Inc
    Eni BB Petroleum Inc.
    Eni US Operating Co. Inc.
    Eni BB Pipeline LLC
Group VII
    Statoil ASA
    Statoil Gulf of Mexico LLC
    Statoil USA E&P Inc.
    Statoil Gulf Properties Inc.
Group VIII
    Petrobras America Inc.
    Petroleo Brasileiro S.A.
Group IX
    Total E&P USA, Inc.

    Dated: October 19, 2011.
Tommy P. Beaudreau,
Director, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management.
[FR Doc. 2011-28314 Filed 11-1-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P
```
```
**Certification Pursuant to 906 by CFO**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Surgical Safety Products, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, R.
Paul Gray, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully compiles with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                               /s/ R. Paul Gray
                                               R. Paul Gray

                                               Chief Financial Officer
                                               Surgical Safety Products, Inc.
October 7, 2003
```
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 20204 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. CARLOS ALBERTO MONTELONGO

- PUENTE , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:17

- CR

- 493

- 1

Before BENAVIDES, HAYNES, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Carlos Alberto Montelongo

- Puente pleaded guilty to being found unlawfully present in the United States following a deportation that was subsequent to a conviction for an aggravated felony. The district court used the 2014 Sentencing Guidelines to calculat e the applicable guidelines sentencing range and sentenced him within th at range to 57 months of

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 7, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-20204 Document: 00514863405 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/07/2019No. 18

- 20204

2 imprisonment to be followed by three years of supervised release. This appeal timely followed. At issue here is the application of a 16

- level increase to Mon telongo

Puente’s offense level pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) based on the determination that his prior Texas conviction for aggravated robbery is a crime of violence for purposes of that Guideline. Montelongo

- Puente acknowl edges our previous h olding in United States v. Santiesteban

- Hernandez , 469 F.3d 376, 380

- 81 (5th Cir. 2006), abrogated on other grounds by United States v. Rodriguez , 711 F.3d 541 (5th Cir. 2013) (en banc), that Texas robbery falls within the generic definition of robbery and thus qualifies as the enumerated offense of robbery for purposes of § 2L1.2’s 16

- level enhancement. He argues, though, that the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals , in Howard v. State , 333 S.W.3d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011), has since interpreted the Texas o f fense of robbery so broadly that it no longer fits the generic definition of robbery. We have recently rejected this argument and reaffirmed the holding of Santiesteban

- Hernandez

. See United States v. Nunez

- Medrano , 751 F. App’x 494 , 498

– 500 (5th Cir. 2018). While Nunez

- Medrano is not binding, it is persuasive. See 5 TH C IR

. R . 47.5.4; Ballard v. Burton , 444 F.3d 391, 401 & n.7

. Because the Texas offense of aggravated robbery qualifies as generic robbery, t he district court did not err in applying § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)’s 16

- level enhancement here. In light of this conclusion, we need not address Montelongo

- Puente’s argument that Texas aggravated robbery does qualify for the enhancement because it does not have as an element the use, attempted use, or thre atened use of physical force against the person of another

. AFFIRMED. Case: 18-20204 Document: 00514863405 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/07/2019
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5076 Considered and Passed Senate (CPS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5076

   To authorize the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate to 
      delegate authority to approve payroll and personnel actions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 20, 2020

    Mr. Blunt introduced the following bill; which was read twice, 
              considered, read the third time, and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To authorize the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate to 
      delegate authority to approve payroll and personnel actions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO DELEGATE AUTHORITY TO APPROVE PAYROLL AND 
              PERSONNEL ACTIONS.

    Section 1201 of the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1984 (2 U.S.C. 
6598) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``all vouchers, for payment of moneys,'' 
        and inserting ``any voucher for payment of moneys, payroll 
        action, or personnel action''; and
            (2) by striking ``any voucher, for payment of moneys,'' and 
        inserting ``any voucher for payment of moneys, payroll action, 
        or personnel action''.
                                 <all>
```
### §720k. Alaska pipeline construction training program

#### (a) Program

#### (1) Establishment

The Secretary of Labor (in this section referred to as the "Secretary") shall make grants to the Alaska Workforce Investment Board—

(A) to recruit and train adult and dislocated workers in Alaska, including Alaska Natives, in the skills required to construct and operate an Alaska gas pipeline system; and

(B) for the design and construction of a training facility to be located in Fairbanks, Alaska, to support an Alaska gas pipeline training program.

#### (2) Coordination with existing programs

The training program established with the grants authorized under paragraph (1) shall be consistent with the vision and goals set forth in the State of Alaska unified plan or combined plan, as appropriate, as developed pursuant to section 3112 or 3113, as appropriate, of title 29.

#### (b) Requirements for grants

The Secretary shall make a grant under subsection (a) only if—

(1) the Governor of the State of Alaska requests the grant funds and certifies in writing to the Secretary that there is a reasonable expectation that the construction of the Alaska natural gas pipeline system will commence by the date that is 2 years after the date of the certification; and

(2) the Secretary of Energy concurs in writing to the Secretary with the certification made under paragraph (1) after considering—

(A) the status of necessary Federal and State permits;

(B) the availability of financing for the Alaska natural gas pipeline project; and

(C) other relevant factors.

#### (c) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry out this section $20,000,000. Not more than 15 percent of the funds may be used for the facility described in subsection (a)(1)(B).

(Pub. L. 108–324, div. C, §113, Oct. 13, 2004, 118 Stat. 1264; Pub. L. 113–128, title V, §512(c), July 22, 2014, 128 Stat. 1706.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2014—Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 113–128 substituted "consistent with the vision and goals set forth in the State of Alaska unified plan or combined plan, as appropriate, as developed pursuant to section 3112 or 3113, as appropriate, of title 29" for "consistent with the vision and goals set forth in the State of Alaska Unified Plan, as developed pursuant to the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (29 U.S.C. 2801 et seq.)".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2014 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 113–128 effective on the first day of the first full program year after July 22, 2014 (July 1, 2015), see section 506 of Pub. L. 113–128, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3101 of Title 29, Labor.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-19-00480-CV

IN RE Claudia LOPEZ

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 24, 2019

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On July 15, 2019, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining of the trial 

court’s denial of her motion for new trial. Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will issue 

only to correct a clear abuse of discretion when there is no other adequate remedy at law. In re 

Sw. Bell Tel. Co., L.P., 235 S.W.3d 619, 623 (Tex. 2007) (orig. proceeding). The denial of a 

motion for new trial may be raised on appeal from final judgment. In re Magana, 14-13-00563-

CV, 2013 WL 3771298, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] July 18, 2013, orig. proceeding)

(per curiam) (mem. op). Here, relator has an appeal pending in this court. Consequently, relator 

has an adequate remedy at law and, therefore, is not entitled to mandamus relief. See id. 

Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2008-CI-19681, styled In the Interest of T.H.C., a Minor, pending in the 

288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Cynthia Marie Chapa presiding.
### §1679d. Credit repair organizations contracts

#### (a) Written contracts required

No services may be provided by any credit repair organization for any consumer—

(1) unless a written and dated contract (for the purchase of such services) which meets the requirements of subsection (b) has been signed by the consumer; or

(2) before the end of the 3-business-day period beginning on the date the contract is signed.

#### (b) Terms and conditions of contract

No contract referred to in subsection (a) meets the requirements of this subsection unless such contract includes (in writing)—

(1) the terms and conditions of payment, including the total amount of all payments to be made by the consumer to the credit repair organization or to any other person;

(2) a full and detailed description of the services to be performed by the credit repair organization for the consumer, including—

(A) all guarantees of performance; and

(B) an estimate of—

(i) the date by which the performance of the services (to be performed by the credit repair organization or any other person) will be complete; or

(ii) the length of the period necessary to perform such services;

(3) the credit repair organization's name and principal business address; and

(4) a conspicuous statement in bold face type, in immediate proximity to the space reserved for the consumer's signature on the contract, which reads as follows: "You may cancel this contract without penalty or obligation at any time before midnight of the 3rd business day after the date on which you signed the contract. See the attached notice of cancellation form for an explanation of this right.".

(Pub. L. 90–321, title IV, §406, as added Pub. L. 104–208, div. A, title II, §2451, Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–458.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

For a prior section 406 of Pub. L. 90–321, see note set out under section 1679 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable after the end of the 6-month period beginning on Sept. 30, 1996, except with respect to contracts entered into by a credit repair organization before the end of such period, see section 413 of Pub. L. 90–321, as added by Pub. L. 104–208, set out as a note under section 1679 of this title.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


              Consent Of Independent Certified Public Accountants



Advanced Nutraceuticals, Inc.
9101 Jameel
Houston, Texas 77040

We have issued our report dated January 3, 2001, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements included in the Annual Report of Advanced Nutraceuticals,
Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2000. We hereby consent to
the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statement for
Advanced Nutraceuticals, Inc. (the successor issuer to Nutrition For Life
International, Inc.) on Form S-8 (File No. 33-99366, effective December 5,
1995).



Grant Thornton LLP
Houston, Texas
January 16, 2001
§ 292.303 Electric utility obligations under this subpart. ( a ) *Obligation to purchase from qualifying facilities.* Each electric utility shall purchase, in accordance with § 292.304, unless exempted by § 292.309 and § 292.310, any energy and capacity which is made available from a qualifying facility: ( 1 ) Directly to the electric utility; or
( 2 ) Indirectly to the electric utility in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section.
( b ) *Obligation to sell to qualifying facilities.* Each electric utility shall sell to any qualifying facility, in accordance with § 292.305, unless exempted by § 292.312, energy and capacity requested by the qualifying facility.
( c ) *Obligation to interconnect.* ( 1 ) Subject to paragraph (c)(2) of this section, any electric utility shall make such interconnection with any qualifying facility as may be necessary to accomplish purchases or sales under this subpart. The obligation to pay for any interconnection costs shall be determined in accordance with § 292.306.
( 2 ) No electric utility is required to interconnect with any qualifying facility if, solely by reason of purchases or sales over the interconnection, the electric utility would become subject to regulation as a public utility under part II of the Federal Power Act.
( d ) *Transmission to other electric utilities.* If a qualifying facility agrees, an electric utility which would otherwise be obligated to purchase energy or capacity from such qualifying facility may transmit the energy or capacity to any other electric utility. Any electric utility to which such energy or capacity is transmitted shall purchase such energy or capacity under this subpart as if the qualifying facility were supplying energy or capacity directly to such electric utility. The rate for purchase by the electric utility to which such energy is transmitted shall be adjusted up or down to reflect line losses pursuant to § 292.304(e)(4) and shall not include any charges for transmission.
( e ) *Parallel operation.* Each electric utility shall offer to operate in parallel with a qualifying facility, provided that the qualifying facility complies with any applicable standards established in accordance with § 292.308.
[Order 688, 71 FR 64372, Nov. 1, 2006; 71 FR 75662, Dec. 18, 2006]
#### § 1316.4 Buy American Act supply contracts.

When so indicated in TVA contract documents or actions, the following clause is included by reference in such documents or actions:

# Buy American Act Supply Contracts

(a) In TVA's acquisition of end products, the Buy American Act (41 U.S.C. 10a-10d) provides that preference be given to domestic end products. A domestic end product means:

(1) An unmanufactured end product which has been mined or produced in the United States; and

(2) An end product manufactured in the United States if the cost of components thereof which are mined, produced, or manufactured in the United States exceeds 50 percent of the cost of all its components.

(b) Contractor agrees that there will be delivered under this contract only domestic end products, except end products:

(1) Which are for use outside the United States;

(2) Which TVA determines are not mined, produced, or manufactured in the United States in sufficient and reasonably available commercial quantities and of a satisfactory quality;

(3) As to which TVA determines the domestic preference to be inconsistent with the public interest; or

(4) As to which TVA determines the cost to be unreasonable.

(End of clause)
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Dana S. Philbrook, hereby certify that:



(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Service Bancorp, Inc.;



(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



(4) The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



(5) The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal controls over financial reporting.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ DANA S. PHILBROOK  
|Dana S. Philbrook      
|Chief Financial Officer
|November 10, 2004
§ 93.705 Health certificate. ( a ) No person may import a hedgehog or tenrec into the United States unless it is accompanied by a health certificate either issued by a full-time salaried veterinary officer of the national government of the exporting region or issued by a veterinarian authorized or accredited by the national government of the exporting region and endorsed by a full-time salaried veterinary officer of the national government of that region. The health certificate must contain the names and street addresses of the consignor and consignee and must state: ( 1 ) That the hedgehog or tenrec originated in a region that has been recognized as free of foot-and-mouth disease by the USDA;
( 2 ) That the hedgehog or tenrec has never been in a region where foot-and-mouth disease exists;
( 3 ) That the hedgehog or tenrec has not been commingled with any other hedgehog or tenrec that originated in or has ever been in a region where foot-and-mouth disease exists;
( 4 ) That the hedgehog or tenrec was inspected by the individual issuing the health certificate and was found free of any ectoparasites not more than 72 hours before being loaded on the means of conveyance which transported the animal to the United States;
( 5 ) That all body surfaces of the hedgehog or tenrec were treated for ectoparasites under the supervision of the veterinarian issuing the health certificate at least 3 days but not more than 14 days before being loaded on the means of conveyance that transported the animal to the United States;
( 6 ) That the pesticide and the concentration used would kill the types of ectoparasites that may infest the animal to be imported;
( 7 ) That the hedgehog or tenrec, after being treated for ectoparasites in accordance with paragraphs (a)(5) and (a)(6) of this section, had physical contact only with, or shared a pen or bedding materials only with, treated hedgehogs or tenrecs in the same shipment to the United States; and
( 8 ) The name and concentration of the pesticide used to treat the hedgehog or tenrec.
( b ) [Reserved]
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0040) [55 FR 31495, Aug. 2, 1990. Redesignated and amended at 62 FR 56012, 56021, Oct. 28, 1997]