alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>



                                                                      EXHIBIT 15




                    ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


Board of Directors
The MIIX Group, Incorporated

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8) of The MIIX Group, Incorporated, pertaining to the amended and
restated 1998 Long Term Incentive Equity Plan of The MIIX Group, Incorporated,
of our report dated August 9, 2002 relating to the unaudited consolidated
interim financial statements of The MIIX Group, Incorporated and subsidiaries
included in this Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002.

                                                 ERNST & YOUNG LLP


New York, New York
August 9, 2002
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 7145** 

BILLY DEAN CHAFFINS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA REGIONAL JAIL

- ABINGDON , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Cour t for the Western District of Virginia , at Roanoke
. James C. Turk , Senior District Judge. ( 7:11

- cv - 00312

- JCT )

Submitted : February 9 , 2012 Decided: February 14, 2012

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Billy Dean Chaffins, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Billy Dean Chaffins appeals the district court ’ s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) complaint. We
h ave reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Chaffins v. Southwest Virginia Regional Jail , No. 7:11

-

cv - 00312

- JCT (W.D. Va. Aug. 17, 2011). Chaffins’ request for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Opinion issued September 25, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-18-00307-CV

———————————

WOLFGANG P. HIRCZY DE MINO, PH.D., Appellant

V.

STAR OPERATIONS., INC., LANA L. LEWIS, AND VICTOR C. HUFF,

JR., Appellees

On Appeal from the 133rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 2017-30978

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Wolfgang P. Hirczy de Mino, Ph.D., has neither established 

indigence, nor paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s 

record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence);

TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b) (allowing dismissal of appeal if no clerk’s record filed due 
2

to appellant’s fault). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, 

appellant responded that he had not been quoted a price. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b) 

(allowing involuntary dismissal). However, the district clerk has advised this court 

that appellant has been notified and has not paid or made arrangements to pay for 

the clerk’s record. 

We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We dismiss all pending 

motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Brown and Caughey.
### §2223e. "Emergency response personnel" defined

As used in sections 2223a to 2223e of this title, the term "emergency response personnel" means personnel responsible for mitigation activities in a medical emergency, fire emergency, hazardous material emergency, or natural disaster.

(Pub. L. 101–446, §6, Oct. 22, 1990, 104 Stat. 1046.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Firefighters' Safety Study Act, and not as part of the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act of 1974 which comprises this chapter.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           5,805
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,199
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,423
<INVENTORY>                                      2,926
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                67,753
<PP&E>                                          76,914
<DEPRECIATION>                                  49,353
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 482,403
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           89,146
<BONDS>                                        297,188
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           228
<OTHER-SE>                                      83,029
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   482,403
<SALES>                                         58,296
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                58,296
<CGS>                                           27,141
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,230
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,233
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    83
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,384
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,656)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (5,820)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,836)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,836)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.12)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2010301EN.01003102.xml

| 6.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/31

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 31 August 2010 — Babcock Noell v The European joint undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy

(Case T-299/10 R)

(Application for interim measures - Public contracts - Tendering procedure - Rejection of a tender - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Prima facie case - Urgency - Balance of interests)

2010/C 301/53

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Babcock Noell GmbH (Würzburg, Germany) (represented by: M. Werner and C. Elbrecht, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: The European joint undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy (represented by: A. Verpont, Agent, assisted by C. Kennedy-Loest, K. Wilson and C. Thomas, Solicitors, and N. Pourbaix, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of decisions taken by the defendant, in the context of a tendering procedure, to reject the applicant’s tenders and to award to another tenderer Lot D of the contract for the supply of ITER toroidal field coils winding packs

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Costs are reserved.

---
---

Exhibit 32








CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND INTERIM CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Overhill Farms, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 27, 2010 (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certify in their capacities as Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:  August 6, 2010
By:
/s/ James RudisJames RudisChief Executive Officer(principal executive officer)Date:  August 6, 2010
By:
/s/ Tracy E. QuinnTracy E. QuinnInterim Chief Financial Officer(principal financial officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 367.4570 Account 457, Services rendered to associate companies.

This account must include amounts billed to associate companies for services rendered at cost (*See* accounts 457.1 through 457.3 in §§ 367.4571 through 367.4573). Overbillings or underbillings arising from adjustments of estimated costs to actual costs must be cleared through this account and concurrent adjustments made to other accounts involved.
# C_2011055EN.01002903.xml

| 19.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/29

---

Action brought on 14 December 2010 — Global Steel Wire v Commission

(Case T-578/10)

2011/C 55/53

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Global Steel Wire, SA (Cerdanyola des Vallés, Spain) (represented by F. González Díaz and A. Tresandi Blanco, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul, pursuant to Article 263 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the decision of the European Commission of 30 September 2010 amending the decision of 30 June 2010 (C(2010) 4837 final in Case COMP/38.344 — prestressing steel); |
| --- | --- |

—

annul, pursuant to Article 263 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the decision of the European Commission of 30 September 2010 amending the decision of 30 June 2010 (C(2010) 4837 final in Case COMP/38.344 — prestressing steel);

| — | in the alternative, annul, pursuant to Article 263 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Article 2 of the decision of the European Commission of 30 September 2010 amending the decision of 30 June 2010 (C(2010) 4837 final in Case COMP/38.344 — prestressing steel) insofar as it entails an infringement of the principle of non-discrimination in not having extended to GSW the additional period for payment of the fine, and fails to state reasons; and |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, annul, pursuant to Article 263 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Article 2 of the decision of the European Commission of 30 September 2010 amending the decision of 30 June 2010 (C(2010) 4837 final in Case COMP/38.344 — prestressing steel) insofar as it entails an infringement of the principle of non-discrimination in not having extended to GSW the additional period for payment of the fine, and fails to state reasons; and

| — | order the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are those already raised in Case T-575/10 Moreda-Riviere Trefilerías v Commission.

Moreda-Riviere Trefilerías

Commission

---
# C_2010179EN.01005302.xml

| 3.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/53

---

Action brought on 6 May 2010 — Cree v OHIM (TRUEWHITE)

(Case T-208/10)

(2010/C 179/91)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Cree Inc (Durham, USA) (represented by V. Schiller, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 17 February 2010 in Case R 985/2009-2; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 17 February 2010 in Case R 985/2009-2;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘TRUEWHITE’ for goods in Classes 9 and 11.

Decision of the Examiner: Rejection of the application.

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal.

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 4, Article 7(1)(b) and Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, (1) because the trade mark concerned is distinctive.

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) and Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, (2) because the trade mark concerned is not descriptive.

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

(2)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

---
2021

• The FCC added to their order that all

U.S. telecommunication providers also

activate text to 988 by July 16, 2022.

2001

• Congress appropriates funding for suicide

prevention hotline.

• SAMHSA awards a competitive grant to a

single lead grantee to establish a network of

crisis centers that can answer calls from their

local communities

The Lifeline’s History

2015

• Lifeline adds chat service, available at

www.suicidepreventionlifeline.org

2013

2007

• SAMHSA and VA partner to establish the

Veterans Crisis Line by “Press 1” on 1-

800-273-8255 (TALK)

•. The Lifeline adds a Spanish language 

subnetwork (now “Press 2”) on 1-800- 

273-8255

2006

• The National Suicide Prevention Lifeline

launched with the number 1-800-273-8255

(TALK)

• Received 46K calls in the first year

2005

2016

• Lifeline chat link added to Google search

engine when a person types “suicide” or

related terms

• Disaster Distress Helpline added into the

Lifeline network, with a different phone

number and SAMHSA funding stream

• The National Suicide Hotline Improvement

Act becomes law. It requires a feasibility

study into a designating a three-digit dialing

code for a national suicide prevention and

mental health crisis hotline system 

2020

• The National Suicide Hotline Designation Act

of 2020 is signed into law. It requires the FCC to

designate 988 as the universal number for a

national suicide prevention and mental health

crisis hotline

• Text service added to the Lifeline

• Lifeline volume has grown to 3.3M calls,

chats, and texts

• On July 16, 2020, the FCC issues the final

order designating 988 as the new Lifeline and

Veterans Crisis Line number, requiring all U.S.

telecommunication providers to activate 988 for

all subscribers by July 16, 2022. 

2022

• The country transitions the Lifeline to

988, an easy-to-remember, three-digit

dialing code

• Around 200 local, independently

owned and operated crisis centers operate

in the U.S.

• The 988 Lifeline launches specialized

services for LGBTQI+ youth and young

adults (press 3 on calls)

• Spanish-language text and chat service

added to the 988 Lifeline

• 988 Lifeline answers nearly 5 million

contacts in its first year

2023

2018
### §4621. Findings

Congress makes the following findings:

(1) Semiconductors and related microelectronic devices are key components in computers, telecommunications equipment, advanced defense systems, and other equipment.

(2) Aggregate sales of such equipment, in excess of $230,000,000,000 annually, comprise a significant portion of the gross national product of the United States.

(3) The leadership position of the United States in advanced technology is threatened by (A) competition from foreign businesses which is promoted and facilitated by the increasingly active involvement of foreign governments, and (B) other changes in the nature of foreign competition.

(4) The principal cause of the relative shift in strength of the United States and its semiconductor competitors is the establishment of a long-term goal by a major foreign competitor to achieve world superiority in semiconductor research and manufacturing technology and the pursuit of such goal by that competitor by effectively marshalling all of the government, industry, and academic resources needed to achieve that goal.

(5) Although the United States semiconductor industry leads all other principal United States industries in terms of its reinvestment in research and development, that has been insufficient by worldwide standards.

(6) Electronic equipment is essential to protect the national security of the United States, as is evidenced by the allocation of approximately 35 percent of the total research, development, and procurement budgets of the Department of Defense to electronics research.

(7) The Armed Forces of the United States will eventually depend extensively on foreign semiconductor technology unless significant steps are taken, and taken at an early date, to retain United States leadership in semiconductor technology research.

(8) It is in the interests of the national security and national economy of the United States for the United States to regain its traditional world leadership in the field of semiconductors.

(9) The most effective means of regaining that leadership is through a joint research effort of the Federal Government and private industry of the United States to improve semiconductor manufacturing technology and to develop practical uses for such technology.

(10) In order to meet the national defense needs of the United States and to insure the continued vitality of a commercial manufacturing base in the United States, it is essential that priority be given to the development, demonstration, and advancement of the semiconductor technology base in the United States.

(11) The national laboratories of the Department of Energy are a major national research resource, and the extensive involvement of such laboratories in the semiconductor research initiatives of the Federal Government and private industry would be an effective use of such laboratories and would help insure the success of such initiatives.

(Pub. L. 100–180, div. C, title I, §3141, Dec. 4, 1987, 101 Stat. 1241.)
Form 10-Q/A-1

			Securities and Exchange Commission
				Washington, DC 20549

	(Mark One)
[X]	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTON 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES 
	EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended	September 30, 1995
					-------------------------.
OR
[ ]	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)OF THE SECURITIES 
	EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For transition period from -------------------- to --------------------.  
									
Commission file number 	0-17080
				--------
				UNITRONIX CORPORATION
				----------------------
	(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) 
	
	New Jersey							22-2086851
---------------------------				--------------------	
(State or other jurisdiction of			  (I.R.S. Employer	 
incorporation or organization)			 Identification No.)

			 One Newbury Street, Peabody, MA 01960			
			 ---------------------------------------
			(Address of principal executive offices)
					(Zip Code)

	   		   	(508) 535-3912
	   ---------------------------------------------------
	   (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
(Former name, former address, former fiscal year, if changed since last 
report) 

Indicate by check mark whether Registrant  (1) has filed all reports 
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange 
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period 
that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been 
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes	  X	 	 No
	-----		-----

		APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY
		  PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS:

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has filed all documents 
and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13, or 15(d) of the 
securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of 
securities under a plan confirmed by a court.
Yes 	  X		  No	
	-----		-----

			APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's 
classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
  9,456,932 shares of common stock, no par value, as of November 1, 1995





Part II - Other Information

Item 6.  Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

A. Exhibits

   Exhibit 27. Financial Data Schedule	   

B. Reports on Form 8-K

   The Company did not file any reports on Form 8-K during this quarter.



Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the 
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the 
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


							Unitronix Corporation
Date: February 6, 1996		
							By: Sean F. Abad
							    ------------------		
							    President


							By: William C. Wimer
							    ------------------	
							    Vice President, Operations