alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SAMHSA Fiscal Year 2016 –

Non-Competing Continuation Standard Terms and Reporting Requirements 

Terms/ 

Reports

Name Language

1 Standard 

Remark 

NonCompeting 

Awards

This Notice of Award (NoA) is issued to inform your organization that the application 

submitted through the (FULL PROGRAM NAME AND ACRONYM) is being continued. 

The (INSERT ACRONYM) Program, as authorized by the (CITE ACT/STATUTE and PUBLIC 

LAW).

2 Standard 

Reporting 

Requirement 

Annual 

Federal 

Financial 

Report (FFR)

The Federal Financial Report (FFR) (SF-425) is required on an annual basis and must be 

submitted no later than 90 days after the end of the budget period. The annual FFR 

should reflect only cumulative actual federal funds authorized and disbursed, any nonfederal matching funds (if identified in the FOA), unliquidated obligations incurred, the 

unobligated balance of the federal funds for the award, as well as program income 

generated during the timeframe covered by the report. The SF-425 is available at 

(http://apply07.grants.gov/apply/forms/sample/SF425-V1.0.pdf). Additional guidance 

to complete the FFR can be found: http://www.samhsa.gov/grants/grantsmanagement/reporting-requirements.

Annual FFRs must be submitted to the applicable email:

CMHS Grants (e.g., SM-12345-01): CMHSFFR@samhsa.hhs.gov

CSAT Grants (e.g., TI-12345-01): CSATFFR@samhsa.hhs.gov

CSAP Grants (e.g., SP-12345-01): CSAPFFR@samhsa.hhs.gov

3 Standard 

Reporting 

Requirement

Performance 

Progress 

Reports

The recipient must submit Programmatic Reports (annual, semi-annual or quarterly) 

no later than the dates (i.e., January 1, 2017, January 1, 2018, etc.) as follows: 

1st Report – [date]; 2nd Report – [date]; 3rd Report - [date]; 4th Report - [date]

[Date] Please submit your Programmatic (annual, semi-annual or quarterly) Report to 

your Program Official.

Note: Recipients must also comply with the GPRA requirements that include the 

collection and periodic reporting of performance data as specified in the FOA or by the 

Program Official. This information is needed in order to comply with PL 102-62 which 

requires that SAMHSA report evaluation data to ensure the effectiveness and 

efficiency of its programs. Please contact your Program Official for additional 

submission information.

4 Standard 

Terms

Reference 

Award 

Standard 

Terms

Insert Award Standard terms

Text in red will be filled in with the award specific information on the Notice of Award
### §§197 to 197d. Repealed. Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title XI, §1131(54), 60 Stat. 1039

Section 197, act Mar. 3, 1927, ch. 365, §1, 44 Stat. 1394, related to establishment of Foreign Commerce Service.

Section 197a, act Mar. 3, 1927, ch. 365, §2, 44 Stat. 1394, related to duties of officers.

Section 197b, acts Mar. 3, 1927, ch. 365, §3, 44 Stat. 1394; Apr. 12, 1930, ch. 142, 46 Stat. 163, related to appointment of officers, assignments for duty, and allowances.

Section 197c, act Mar. 3, 1927, ch. 365, §4, 44 Stat. 1395, related to employment of clerks and assistants.

Section 197d, act Mar. 3, 1927, ch. 365, §5, 44 Stat. 1396, related to status of officer while serving abroad.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective three months from Aug. 13, 1946, see section 1141 of act Aug. 13, 1946.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

This notice corrects a notice (FR Doc. 2011-5166) published on page 12739 of the issue for Tuesday, March 8, 2011.

Under the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas heading, the entry for Comerica, Inc., Dallas, Texas, is revised to read as follows:

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (E. Ann Worthy, Vice President) 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:

                    1.                     *Comerica, Inc.,*                     Dallas, Texas; to acquire through Comerica Bayou Acquisition Corporation, 100 percent of the voting shares of Sterling Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire Sterling Bank, both of Houston, Texas.                

Comments on this application must be received by April 1, 2011.

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 10, 2011.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2011-5991 Filed 3-14-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
### §176b. Repealed. June 25, 1948, ch. 645, §21, 62 Stat. 862

Section, act Jan. 27, 1938, ch. 11, §2, 52 Stat. 8, related to disclosure by employee of information. See section 1905 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Section 20 of act June 25, 1948, provided that the repeal of this section shall be effective Sept. 1, 1948.
NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_______________ No. 21

- 3324

_______________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. KEVIN ALYN MADZIAREK, Appellant

_______________ On appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (D.C. No. 1:20

- cr - 00243

- 001 ) U.S. District Judge: Honorable Christopher C. Conner

_______________ Submitted Under Third Circuit L.A.R. 34.1(a) on November 1 7 , 2022 Before: AMBRO, KRAUSE, and BIBAS, Ci rcuit Judges (Filed: December 12, 2022)

_______________ OPINION *

_______________ BIBAS, Circuit Judge

. Kevin Madziarek was camping with his son and brother on a friend’s undeveloped land when neig h bors c alled the police, saying they had heard gunshots. Police went to

* This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and, under I.O.P. 5.7, is not binding precedent.2 investigate. While speaking with the neighbors, t hey ran into Madziarek’s brother

. He did not know where Madziarek was but agreed to take them to the campsite. At the campsite, the officers f ound a tent, a smoldering campfire about thirty to fifty feet away from the tent , and a group of items a few feet beyond that. Among those items, they spotted “two cylindrical devices.” App. 134. They suspected, correctly, that these were improvised explosives. Madziarek was charged with unlawfully possessing a destructive device, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § § 58 45(a)(8) , 58 61(d ). The District Court denied his motion to suppress under the Fourth Amendment. On appeal, Madziarek claims only that the officers needed a search warrant because his tent was an “abode” with curtilage protected from search. Appellant’s Br. 13. In the District Court, he defined the reach of that curtilage as “ very small and extend [ing] only around the tent and to the fire ring.” App. 111 (emphases added). Relying on this definition, the District Court found that the explosives “were outside the area Madziarek claims is protected curtilage.” App. 141 (emphasis in original). Mad z i arek does not challenge where the e xplosives were found . B ut he now argues that the curtilage includes the “firepit area.” Appellant’s Br. 14. This fuzzier phras ing seems to expand his curtilage claim

. But he waived any argument adding to his proposed curtilage.
See United States v. Joseph , 730 F.3d 336, 3 41 (3d Cir. 2013 )

. In any event, the area in which the explosives were found could not fairly be considered curtilage

. It was at least thirty feet from Madziarek’s tent, not concealed or enclosed, and visible from a shared road

. On these facts, he had no reasona ble expectat ion o f priv acy. See United States v. Dunn , 480 U.S. 294, 3 01 (1987). So the area was an “ open field, ” and3 the officers did not violate the Fourth Amendment by entering it. See Oliver v. United
States , 466 U.S. 170, 180 n.11 (1984). We will therefore affirm

.
### §5723. Enforcement

The Commission shall enforce the requirements of this subchapter. For the purpose of the exercise by the Commission of its functions and powers under the Federal Trade Commission Act [15 U.S.C. 41 et seq.], a violation of any requirement imposed under this subchapter shall be deemed a violation of a requirement imposed under that Act. All the functions and powers of the Commission under that Act are available to the Commission to enforce compliance by any person with the requirements imposed under this subchapter, irrespective of whether that person is engaged in commerce or meets any other jurisdictional tests in that Act. The Commission may prescribe such regulations as are necessary or appropriate to implement the provisions of this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 102–556, title III, §303, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4192.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal Trade Commission Act, referred to in text, is act Sept. 26, 1914, ch. 311, 38 Stat. 717, which is classified generally to subchapter I (§41 et seq.) of chapter 2 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 58 of this title and Tables.
### §6611. Damages in tort claims

#### (a) In general

A party to a Y2K action making a tort claim, other than a claim of intentional tort arising independent of a contract, may not recover damages for economic loss unless—

(1) the recovery of such losses is provided for in a contract to which the party seeking to recover such losses is a party; or

(2) such losses result directly from damage to tangible personal or real property caused by the Y2K failure involved in the action (other than damage to property that is the subject of the contract between the parties to the Y2K action or, in the event there is no contract between the parties, other than damage caused only to the property that experienced the Y2K failure),

and such damages are permitted under applicable Federal or State law.

#### (b) Economic loss

For purposes of this section only, and except as otherwise specifically provided in a valid and enforceable written contract between the plaintiff and the defendant in a Y2K action, the term "economic loss" means amounts awarded to compensate an injured party for any loss, and includes amounts awarded for damages such as—

(1) lost profits or sales;

(2) business interruption;

(3) losses indirectly suffered as a result of the defendant's wrongful act or omission;

(4) losses that arise because of the claims of third parties;

(5) losses that must be pled as special damages; and

(6) consequential damages (as defined in the Uniform Commercial Code or analogous State commercial law).

#### (c) Certain other actions

A person liable for damages, whether by settlement or judgment, in a civil action to which this chapter does not apply because of section 6603(c) of this title whose liability, in whole or in part, is the result of a Y2K failure may, notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, pursue any remedy otherwise available under Federal or State law against the person responsible for that Y2K failure to the extent of recovering the amount of those damages.

(Pub. L. 106–37, §12, July 20, 1999, 113 Stat. 199.)
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 201 (Wednesday, October 17, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 63799]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-25519]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

Proposed Extension of Approval of Information Collection; Comment 
Request--Children's Sleepwear

AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety Commission.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 
Chapter 35), the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) requested 
comments on a proposed extension of approval, for a period of 3 years 
from the date of approval by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), 
of a collection of information from manufacturers and importers of 
children's sleepwear. This collection of information is in the Standard 
for the Flammability of Children's Sleepwear: Sizes 0 through 6X and 
the Standard for the Flammability of Children's Sleepwear: Sizes 7 
through 14 and regulations implementing those standards. See 16 CFR 
parts 1615 and 1616. The children's sleepwear standards and 
implementing regulations establish requirements for testing and 
recordkeeping by manufacturers and importers of children's sleepwear.
    This document was published in the Federal Register of October 4, 
2012, and contains an incorrect docket number.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert H. Squibb, Consumer Product 
Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814; (301) 
504-7815, or by email to: rsquibb@cpsc.gov.

Correction

    (1) In the Federal Register of October 4, 2012, 77 FR 60684, in the 
second column, correct the docket number in the heading to read: 
[Docket No. CPSC-2012-0055];
    (2) In the Federal Register of October 4, 2012, 77 FR 60684, in the 
second column, Correct the first sentence of the ADDRESSES section to 
read: ``You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. CPSC-2012-
0055, by any of the following methods:''

    Dated: October 12, 2012.
Todd A. Stevenson,
 Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-25519 Filed 10-16-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF LAT SPORTSWEAR, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 27,
1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-27-1997
<CASH>                                             177
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,656
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,133
<INVENTORY>                                     18,329
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,524
<PP&E>                                           7,360
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,611
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  28,739
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,242
<BONDS>                                         11,732
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,825
<OTHER-SE>                                        (590)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    28,739
<SALES>                                         72,608
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                72,608
<CGS>                                           60,732
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   60,732
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   391
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,582
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (725)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        21
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (746)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (746)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.18)
        

</TABLE>
#### § 367.3060 Account 306, Leasehold improvements.

This account must include all costs incurred by the service company in improvements of, remodeling of, or installation of additional facilities in rented offices or buildings to suit tenant's needs, placed in service prior to January 1, 2008.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                        [RYDER SCOTT COMPANY LETTERHEAD]


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

     As independent petroleum engineers, we hereby consent to the use of our
name in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hugoton Energy Corporation for the
year ended December 31, 1997. We further consent to the inclusion of our
estimate of reserves and present value of future net reserves for December 31,
1997, 1996 and 1995 in such Annual Report.


                                        /s/  RYDER SCOTT COMPANY
                                             PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

                                        RYDER SCOTT COMPANY
                                        PETROLEUM ENGINEERS



Houston, Texas
March 24, 1998
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 50 (Tuesday, March 15, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 14037]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-6027]



[[Page 14037]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Library of Medicine; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the 
Biomedical Library and Informatics Review Committee.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable materials, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Biomedical Library and Informatics Review 
Committee.
    Date: June 9, 2011.
    Time: June 9, 2011, 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Library of Medicine, Building 38, 2nd Floor, 
Board Room, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Time: June 10, 2011, 8 a.m. to 2 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Contact Person: Arthur A. Petrosian, PhD, Chief Scientific 
Review Officer, Division of Extramural Programs, National Library of 
Medicine, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 301, Bethesda, MD 20892-7968, 
301-496-4253, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#51213425233e223830113c30383d7f3f38397f363e27"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="05756071776a766c644568646c692b6b6c6d2b626a73">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.879, 
Medical Library Assistance, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 9, 2011.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-6027 Filed 3-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### §7606. Prohibition of certain waivers

A prescriber may not place on the prescription, or require the patient to sign, or deliver to the patient a form or notice waiving or disclaiming the liability or responsibility of the prescriber for the accuracy of the eye examination. The preceding sentence does not impose liability on a prescriber for the ophthalmic goods and services dispensed by another seller pursuant to the prescriber's correctly verified prescription.

(Pub. L. 108–164, §7, Dec. 6, 2003, 117 Stat. 2026.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 60 days after Dec. 6, 2003, see section 12 of Pub. L. 108–164, set out as a note under section 7601 of this title.
Order entered July 16, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 14 - 00664 - CV MEDICAL CITY DALLAS HOSPITAL, INC. , ET AL. , Appellant s V. ARDELL WILLIAMS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 Dallas County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC - 13 - 04209 - A 

### O RDER We GRANT appellee’s July 14, 2014 unopposed motion for an extension of time to file her brief. Appellee shall file her brief on or before August 15, 2014 . We caution appellee that no further extension o f time will be granted in this accelerated appeal absent extraordinary circumstances.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 19

- 00108

- CV

TIMOTHY WILKINS

v. LAGUNA BAY CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.

On Appeal from the 445th District Court of Cameron County , Texas Trial Cause No. 2015

- DCL

- 01858

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, ha ving considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant.
We further order this decision certified below for observance. September 17, 2020
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  Registration  Statements
(Form S-8 No.  333-83821)  pertaining to the 1997 Long Term Incentive  Plans and
the 1999 Non-Employee  Director Stock Plan, (Form S-8 No. 33- 320557) pertaining
to the 1993 Long Term Incentive Plan, the  Restrictive  Share Plan for Directors
and Various Stock Option  Agreements  of Video  Services  Corporation  (formerly
International  Post  Limited)  and (Form S-3 No. 333- 31745)  pertaining  to the
Registration  Statement  and related  Prospectus of Video  Services  Corporation
(formerly  International  Post Limited) of our report dated  September 10, 1999,
with  respect to the  consolidated  financial  statements  and schedule of Video
Services  Corporation  included in the Annual  Report  (Form 10- K) for the year
ended June 30, 1999.


                                                    /S/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
White Plains, New York
October 11, 1999
#### § 1308.25 Stay of appeal for Contracting Officer's decision.

If an appeal has been taken because of a Contracting Officer's failure to render a timely decision, as provided by § 1308.17, the Hearing Officer, with or without a motion by a party, may stay proceedings on the appeal in order to obtain a decision on the matter appealed. Oral argument will not be heard on such a motion unless otherwise directed. The stay order will normally set a date certain by which the decision of the Contracting Officer will be rendered. Such date shall take into account the factors mentioned in § 1308.13(c), the length of time the matter has already been pending before the Contracting Officer, and the need for prompt and expeditious action on appeals.