alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Meeting Record | The White House

http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/2060_meeting_09112013[10/30/2013 1:31:02 PM]

Get Email Updates Contact Us

Home • The Administration • Office of Management and Budget

REGULATION &

INFORMATION POLICY

About OIRA

Information Policy

Federal Collection of

Information

Regulatory Matters

Meetings and Outside

Communication

Reports to Congress

For Agencies

Statistical Programs &

Standards

Meeting Record

Meeting Record Regarding: Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from New Stationary

Sources: Electric Utility Generation Units

Date: 9 / 11 / 2013

Name Affiliation Client (if applicable)

Nathan Frey OMB/OIRA

Bob Wayland EPA

Kevin Culligan EPA

Bary Ellman EPA

Dom Mancini OMB/OIRA

John "Jack" Rayburn TFAH

Don Hoppert APHA

Peter Iwanowriz Am. Large Association

David Dysack NACCHO

Philip Foy CEQ

Jim Laity OMB/OIRA

Gary Ewart ATS

Meeting material provided to OMB ( pages, kb)

Document 1 (23 pages, 908 kb)

About OMBlog The Budget Management Regulation & Information Policy Legislative Information Join OMB Contact OMB

Home

The White House Blog

Photos & Videos

Photo Galleries

Video

Performances

Briefing Room

Your Weekly Address

Speeches & Remarks

Press Briefings

Statements & Releases

White House Schedule

Presidential Actions

Issues

Civil Rights

Defense

Disabilities

Economy

Education

Energy & Environment

The Administration

President Barack Obama

Vice President Joe Biden

First Lady Michelle Obama

Dr. Jill Biden

The Cabinet

White House Staff

About the White House

Inside the White House

Presidents

First Ladies

The Oval Office

The Vice President's

Residence & Office

Our Government

The Executive Branch

The Legislative Branch

The Judicial Branch

The Constitution

Federal Agencies &

Commissions

Federal Register | Join OMB | FOIA | No FEAR Act | OMB Locator | USA.Gov | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Site Search
Meeting Record | The White House

http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/2060_meeting_09112013[10/30/2013 1:31:02 PM]

Live Streams

Podcasts

Legislation

Nominations &

Appointments

Disclosures

Ethics

Equal Pay

Foreign Policy

Health Care

Homeland Security

Immigration

Refinancing

Rural

Service

Seniors & Social Security

Snapshots

Taxes

Technology

Urban and Economic

Mobility

Veterans

Violence Prevention

Women

Executive Office of the

President

Other Advisory Boards

Eisenhower Executive

Office Building

Camp David

Air Force One

White House Fellows

White House Internships

Tours & Events

Mobile Apps

Elections & Voting

State & Local Government

Resources

En español Accessibility Copyright Information Privacy Policy Contact

USA.gov Developers Apply for a Job
§ 95.33 Hay and straw; importations permitted subject to restrictions. Except as provided in § 95.39, hay or straw which does not meet the conditions or requirements of § 95.32 shall be handled and treated in the following manner upon arrival at the port of entry: ( a ) Hay or straw packing materials shall be burned or disinfected at the expense of the importer or consignee in the manner and at the time directed by the Deputy Administrator, Veterinary Services.
( b ) Hay or straw for use as feeding material, bedding, or similar purposes shall be stored and held in quarantine for a period of not less than 90 days in an approved warehouse at the port of entry and shall be otherwise handled as directed by the Deputy Administrator, Veterinary Services.
[28 FR 5981, June 13, 1963. Redesignated and amended at 78 FR 73003, 73007, Dec. 4, 2013]
2013 Cellulosic Biofuel Standard Call Log

All calls listed discussed the current status of technology development for the production of

cellulosic biofuel, status and projected completion date of the construction of cellulosic biofuel

facilities (if applicable), and expected production volumes, ramp

- up targets, and other production

milestones. Much of the information discussed is considered CBI.

Date Company Participant(s)

1/5/2012 DuPont Jennifer Hutchins

1/5/2012 CORE Biofuels Doug Sheppard

1/9 /2012 American Process Inc. Kim Nelson

1/9/2012 Abengoa Chris Standlee

1/10/2012 Covanta Chris Weber

1/10/2012 Poet Jim Sturdevant

1/10/2012 KiOR Andre Ditsch

1/10/2012 Enerkem Marie

- Helene Labrie

1/10/2012 Renmatix (Sirya) Tim Brown

1/11/2012 Coskata Loula Merkel

1/11/2012 Terrabon Gary Gaverick

1/13/2012 Sundrop Fuels Steve Silvers

1/13/2012 BP Ruth Scotti

1/24/2012 Fulcrum Ted Kniesche

2/6/2012 Abengoa Chris Standlee

2/13/2012 ZeaChem Carrie Atiyeh

2/13/2012 Poet Jim Sturdevant, Nathan Schock

2/14/2012 Fiberight Craig Stuart

- Paul

2/15/2012 KL Energy (Blue Sugars) Ryan Zebroski

2/15/2012 INEOS Bio Dan Cummings, Mark Niederschulte, Kelly Russell

2/16/2012 KiOR John Kasbaum, Andre Ditsch, Marty Fuller

4/17/2012 C oskata Loula Merkel

4/20/2012 Rentech Bob Freerks

6/20/2012 American Process Inc Kim Nelson

6/20/2012 INEOS Bio Kelly Russell

6/25/2012 KiOR John Kasbaum

6/28/2012 Thor Renewables Bill Cox

6/29/2012 ZeaChem Carrie Atiyeh

7/27/2012 INEOS Bio Dan Cummings

8/6/2012 Solena Steve Miller

8/14/2012 KiOR Quarterly Update

9/12/2012 Fiberight Craig Stuart

- Paul

9/18/2012 INEOS Bio Dan Cummings

9/19/2012 EIA Bill Brown, Mac Statton

9/21/2012 Abengoa Gerson Santos, Chris Standlee

9/21/2012 KiOR John Kasbaum

9/27/2012 American Process Inc Kim Nelson9/27/2012 Poet Larry Ward

11/30/12 Old Town Fuel + Fiber James St. Pierre

12/10/2012 KiOR John Kasbaum

12/10/2012 INEOS Bio Dan Cummings, Kelly Russell

12/13/2012 ZeaChem Carrie Atiyeh

1/10/2013 EIA Mac Statton, John Maples, Mindi Farber

- DeAnda,

Mike Cole

1/23/2013 Ensyn Bob Graham, Bob Pirraglia, Judson Grief, Amy

Chiang

2/20/2013 Cool Planet Biofuels Mike Rocke

2/20/2013 Nature’s Fuel Bill Sinish

2/22/2013 Virent Aaron Emry

2/22/2013 Lanza Tech Carl Wolf

2/22/2013 INEOS Bio Dan Cummings

2/22/2013 Fiberight Craig Stuart

- Paul

2/25/2013 Covanta Steve Weber

2/26/2013 Biotechnology Industry

Organization Chris Standlee, Doug Berven, Stephan Tanda, Pat

Gruber, Matt Carr, Erick Lutt

2/27/2013 EIA Mac Statton

2/28/2013 Abengoa Chris Standlee

3/4/2013 Poet Larry Ward

3/7/2013 KiOR John Kasbaum

3/18/2013 KiOR Quarterly Update

3/18/2013 Fiberight Craig Stuart

- Paul

3/21/2013 EIA Mac Statton, Mindi Farber

- DeAnda

3/22/2013 DuPont Michael Parr, Steven Mirshak

4/4/2013 INEOS Bio Dan Cummings

4/4/2013 American Process Inc Kim Nelson

4/9/2013 DOE (BETO) Chris Ramig, Brian Duff, Ross Miscel, Glen Doyne,

Brenda Bernsen, Gene Peterson

4/30/2013 KiOR John Kasbaum

5/9/2013 KiOR Quarterly Update

5/28/2013 INEOS Bio Dan Cummings, Kelly Russell

6/17/2013 KiOR John Kasbaum
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.84








THE PROGRESSIVE CORPORATION
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION 


	
		
	 
	2015-2016 Compensation

	Lead Independent Director
	$25,000 additional

	Audit Committee Chair
	$280,000

	Audit Committee Member
	$255,000

	Compensation Committee Chair
	$275,000

	Compensation Committee Member
	$250,000

	Investment Committee Chair
	$275,000

	Investment Committee Member
	$250,000

	Additional Committee Chair*
	$20,000 additional

	Additional Committee Member*
	$15,000 additional






*Excludes Executive Committee
NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_______________

No. 21-3324

_______________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

KEVIN ALYN MADZIAREK,

Appellant

_______________

On appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. No. 1:20-cr-00243-001)

U.S. District Judge: Honorable Christopher C. Conner

_______________

Submitted Under Third Circuit L.A.R. 34.1(a) 

on November 17, 2022

Before: AMBRO, KRAUSE, and BIBAS, Circuit Judges

(Filed: December 12, 2022)

_______________

OPINION*

_______________

BIBAS, Circuit Judge.

Kevin Madziarek was camping with his son and brother on a friend’s undeveloped land 

when neighbors called the police, saying they had heard gunshots. Police went to 

* This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and, under I.O.P. 5.7, is not binding 

precedent.
2

investigate. While speaking with the neighbors, they ran into Madziarek’s brother. He did 

not know where Madziarek was but agreed to take them to the campsite.

At the campsite, the officers found a tent, a smoldering campfire about thirty to fifty 

feet away from the tent, and a group of items a few feet beyond that. Among those items, 

they spotted “two cylindrical devices.” App. 134. They suspected, correctly, that these were 

improvised explosives. Madziarek was charged with unlawfully possessing a destructive 

device, in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§5845(a)(8), 5861(d). The District Court denied his motion to suppress under the Fourth Amendment.

On appeal, Madziarek claims only that the officers needed a search warrant because his 

tent was an “abode” with curtilage protected from search. Appellant’s Br. 13. In the District 

Court, he defined the reach of that curtilage as “very small and extend[ing] only around the 

tent and to the fire ring.” App. 111 (emphases added). Relying on this definition, the District Court found that the explosives “were outside the area Madziarek claims is protected 

curtilage.” App. 141 (emphasis in original). 

Madziarek does not challenge where the explosives were found. But he now argues that 

the curtilage includes the “firepit area.” Appellant’s Br. 14. This fuzzier phrasing seems to

expand his curtilage claim. But he waived any argument adding to his proposed curtilage. 

See United States v. Joseph, 730 F.3d 336, 341 (3d Cir. 2013).

In any event, the area in which the explosives were found could not fairly be considered 

curtilage. It was at least thirty feet from Madziarek’s tent, not concealed or enclosed, and 

visible from a shared road. On these facts, he had no reasonable expectation of privacy.

See United States v. Dunn, 480 U.S. 294, 301 (1987). So the area was an “open field,” and 
3

the officers did not violate the Fourth Amendment by entering it. See Oliver v. United 

States, 466 U.S. 170, 180 n.11 (1984). We will therefore affirm.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed January 4, 2023.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22-844

Lower Tribunal No. 18-41136

________________

Francisca R. Rozas Cristino,

Appellant,

vs.

Jermaine Anderson,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Mark 

Blumstein, Judge.

Law Offices of Lazaro Lopez, and Lazaro Lopez, for appellant.

The Brown Law Group, LLC, and Vincent T. Brown, for appellees.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and LOGUE and HENDON, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Sunset Harbour Condo. Ass'n v. Robbins, 914 So. 2d 925, 

928 (Fla. 2005) (“In order to be preserved for further review by a higher 
2

court, an issue must be presented to the lower court and the specific legal 

argument or ground to be argued on appeal or review must be part of that 

presentation if it is to be considered preserved.” (quoting Tillman v. 

State, 471 So. 2d 32, 35 (Fla.1985))).
#### § 93.514 Manure from quarantined swine.

No manure shall be removed from the quarantine premises until the release of the swine producing same.
**Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 October 2012 —
Commission v France

(Case C-164/11)**

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2003/96/EC — Taxation of energy products and electricity — Failure to transpose within the prescribed period

1.                     *Actions for failure to fulfil obligations — Examination of the merits by the Court — Situation to be taken into consideration —
Situation on expiry of the time-limit set in the reasoned opinion (Art. 258 TFEU) (see paras 41, 45)*

2.                     *Tax provisions — Harmonisation of laws — Taxation of energy products and electricity — Directive 2003/96 — Implementation
by Member States — Obligation to achieve a result — Failure to satisfy that obligation — Failure to fulfil obligations (Art.
258 TFEU; Council Directive 2003/96, Art. 18(10), second subpara.) (see para 47, operative part)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to adopt, within the prescribed period, the provisions necessary to adapt its electricity taxation system to the provisions laid down by Council Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October 2003 restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity (OJ 2003 L 283, p. 51) — Application of a single rate on expiry of the transitional period. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Declares that, by failing to adopt the provisions necessary to adapt its electricity taxation system to the provisions laid down by Council Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October 2003 restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity, despite the expiry of the transitional period provided for in the second subparagraph of Article 18(10) of that directive, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the French Republic to pay the costs. |
AMERICAN AIRLINES 

DELTA AIR LINES 

UNITED AIR LINES 

US AIRWAYS 

July 27, 2010 

Esta Rosenberg 

Chief, U.S. Carrier Licensing Division 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20520 

 RE: United/US Airways Temporary Brazil Frequency 

Reallocation and US Airways Exemption Amendment 

(DOT-OST-2010-0183 and DOT-OST-2009-0003); Delta 

Brazil Frequency Application (DOT-OST-2010-0186); 

American Regional Brazil Frequency Application 

(DOT-OST-2010-0188)___________________________

Dear Ms. Rosenberg: 

 American Airlines, Inc., Delta Air Lines, Inc., United Air 

Lines, Inc., and US Airways, Inc. wish to inform the Department 

that none of the carriers intends to object to the abovecaptioned applications of any of the others. The proposals 

submitted will enable American and Delta to introduce beneficial 

new services for the upcoming peak winter season in Brazil and 

US Airways to begin new services to Sao Paulo in 2011. We have 

also polled all other U.S.-Brazil carriers and determined that 

there are no objections. In light the uncontested status of the 

applications, and the need to plan and market these new services, we jointly urge the Department to act quickly and 

favorably on all of these requests.
MAY 12-18

2024

Sponsored by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health 

Services Administration (SAMHSA), National Prevention 

Week is a public education platform showcasing the 

work of communities and organizations across the 

country that are preventing substance use and misuse 

and promoting positive mental health.

A WAY FOR EVERYONE TO GET INVOLVED

We’re encouraging everyone to create and share a prevention 

story on social media using #MyPreventionStory.

Visit samhsa.gov/prevention-week for inspiration and ideas.
Page 1

Fiscal Year 2018 –

New Award Standard Terms and Reporting Requirements

Terms/ 

Reports

Name Language

1 Remark All New Grant 

Awards

All New Grant Awards This Notice of Award (NoA) is issued to inform your 

organization that the application submitted through the (FULL PROGRAM NAME AND 

ACRONYM) funding opportunity (INSERT FOA #) has been selected for funding. The 

(INSERT ACRONYM) Program, as authorized by the (CITE ACT/STATUTE and PUBLIC 

LAW).

2 Standard 

Reporting 

Requirement 

Annual 

Federal

Financial 

Report (FFR)

The Federal Financial Report (FFR) (SF-425) is required on an annual basis and must be 

submitted no later than 90 days after the end of the budget period. The annual 

Federal Financial Report (FFR) should reflect only cumulative actual Federal funds 

authorized and disbursed, any non-Federal matching funds (if identified in the Funding 

Opportunity Announcement (FOA)), unliquidated obligations incurred, the unobligated 

balance of the Federal funds for the award, as well as program income generated 

during the timeframe covered by the report. Additional guidance to complete the FFR 

can be found: http://www.samhsa.gov/grants/grants-management/reportingrequirements.

FFR reporting must be entered directly into the eRA Commons system. Instructions 

on how to submit a Federal Financial Report (FFR) via the eRA Commons is available at 

https://www.samhsa.gov/sites/default/files/samhsa-grantee-submit-ffr-10-22-17.pptx

3 Standard 

Reporting 

Requirement

Performance 

Progress 

Reports

Submission of a Programmatic Report is due no later than the dates as follows:

1st Report - 

2nd Report - 

3rd Report - 

4th Report - 

Note: Recipients must also comply with the Government Performance and Results Act

(GPRA) requirements that include the collection and periodic reporting of performance 

data as specified in the FOA or by the Grant Program Official (GPO). This information 

is needed in order to comply with PL 102-62, which requires that SAMHSA report 

evaluation data to ensure the effectiveness and efficiency of its programs. 

Progress reports must be must be submitted through the eRA Commons system. 

Please contact your Government Program Official (GPO) for program specific 

submission information. Additional information on reporting requirements is available 

at https://www.samhsa.gov/grants/grants-management/reporting-requirements. 
 Page 2

4 Standard Terms Reference 

Award 

Standard 

Terms

Reference Grants Awarded in Fiscal Year 2018 Standard Terms and Conditions at 

https://www.samhsa.gov/grants/grants-management/notice-award-noa/standardterms-conditions
## Summary	of	Interagency	Working	Comments	on Draft	Language	under

E
. O .	13563	and 12866	Interagency	Review.		Subject	to	Further	Policy	Review.
**Comments on U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Proposed Rule,**  **“ Control of Air Pollution f** **rom Motor Vehicles: Tier 3 Motor Vehicle Emission and Fuel Standards** **, ”**  **RIN 2060**  **- AQ86**  As EPA granted the waiver for California’s program in December 2012, the costs and benefits for that program should be included in the baseline of the R IA analysis for Tier 3. C alifornia’s a ir pollutant st andards have long been different than o ther parts of the country so it makes both analytic a nd policy sense to consider the incremental impacts, costs and benefits of the rule with and without the California program. It is requested that EPA breakdown and present these incremental impacts for the scenari os laid out in the matrix below. A clarifying question would be whether the seven other states that adopted California’s standard would also be included in the baseline for Tier 3
. Presumably they should be included in the baseline if they adopted Cal ifornia’s program ; however, w ould the seven other states be preempted by the federal program if Tier 3 goes into effect? Fuel Sulfur Only Fuel Sulfur and Vehicle Controls Tier 3 (not counting CA) A B Tier 3 (entire country) C D A – Thi s breakout will incorporate the impacts of the California program in the Tier 3 baseline so it separates the costs and benefits of the California program from the Tier 3 program
. The costs and ben efits of the Tier 3 program will be estimated for all states outside of California and just for the fuel sulfur portion of Tier 3 , not the vehicle controls portion of Tier 3. B
- This breakout will incorporate the impacts of the California program in the Tier 3 baseline s o it separates the costs and benefits of the California program from the Tier 3 program
. The costs and benefits of the Tier 3 program will be estimated for all states outside of California cover ing both the fuel sulfur and vehicle controls portions of Tie r 3. C – This breakout will incorporate the impacts of the California program in the Tier 3 cost and benefit analysis, although would only apply to the fuel sulfur portion of Tier 3 and not the vehicle co ntrols portion of the program. D
- This breako ut will incorporate the impacts of the California program in the Tier 3 cost and benefit analysis and is what the agency has provide to date.
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 104 (Monday, June 1, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 31092]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-13114]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 9156]

Notice of Meeting of Advisory Committee on International Law

    A meeting of the Department of State's Advisory Committee on 
International Law will take place on Friday, June 26, from 9:30 a.m. to 
5:00 p.m. at the George Washington University Law School, Michael K. 
Young Faculty Conference Center, 716 20th Street NW., 5th Floor, 
Washington, DC. Acting Legal Adviser Mary McLeod will chair the 
meeting, which will be open to the public up to the capacity of the 
conference room. The meeting will include discussions on a variety of 
international law topics.
    Members of the public who wish to attend should contact the Office 
of the Legal Adviser by June 22 at thorntonnc@state.gov or 202-776-8356 
and provide their name, professional affiliation, address, and phone 
number. A valid photo ID is required for admission to the meeting. 
Attendees who require reasonable accommodation should make their 
requests by June 19. Late requests will be considered but might not be 
possible to accommodate.

    Dated: May 20, 2015.
Nicole C. Thornton,
Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, Executive Director, 
Advisory Committee on International Law, United States Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. 2015-13114 Filed 5-29-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
```
#### § 2.23 Use of reserved authority in hydropower licenses to ameliorate cumulative impacts.

The Commission will address and consider cumulative impact issues at original licensing and relicensing to the fullest extent possible consistent with the Commission's statutory responsibility to avoid undue delay in the relicensing process and to avoid undue delay in the amelioration of individual project impacts at relicensing. To the extent, if any, that it is not possible to explore and address all cumulative impacts at relicensing, the Commission will reserve authority to examine and address such impacts after the new license has been issued, but will define that reserved authority as narrowly and with as much specificity as possible, particularly with respect to the purpose of reserving that authority. The Commission intends that such articles will describe, to the maximum extent possible, reasonably foreseeable future resource concerns that may warrant modifications of the licensed project. Before taking any action pursuant to such reserved authority, the Commission will publish notice of its proposed action and will provide an opportunity for hearing by the licensee and all interested parties. Hydropower licenses also contain standard “reopener” articles (see § 2.9 of this part) which reserve authority to the Commission to require, among other things, licensees of projects located in the same river basin to mitigate the cumulative impacts of those projects on the river basin. In light of the policy described above, the Commission will use the standard “reopener” articles to explore and address cumulative impacts only (except in extraordinary circumstances) where such impacts were not known at the time of licensing or are the result of changed circumstances. The Commission has authority under the Federal Power Act to require licensees, during the term of the license, to develop and provide data to the Commission on the cumulative impacts of licensed projects located in the same river basin. In issuing both new and original licenses, the Commission will coordinate the expiration dates of the licenses to the maximum extent possible, to maximize future consideration of cumulative impacts at the same time in contemporaneous proceedings at relicensing. The Commission's intention is to consider to the extent practicable cumulative impacts at the time of licensing and relicensing, and to eliminate the need to resort to the use of reserved authority.

[59 FR 66718, Dec. 28, 1994]