alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 24.1

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned does hereby
appoint and constitute Marc I. Perkins and Michael M. Vehlies and each of them
as his agent and attorney-in-fact to execute in his name, place and stead
(whether on behalf of the undersigned individually or as an officer or director
of Gunther International, Ltd. or otherwise) to the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
of Gunther International, Ltd. respecting its fiscal year ended March 31, 2001
and any and all further amendments thereto and to file such report and any
further amendments thereto with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Each of
the said attorneys shall have the power to act hereunder with or without the
other.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this instrument this 29
day of June, 2001.



/s/ James A. Cotter, Jr.
--------------------------------
James A. Cotter, Jr.

/s/ J. Kenneth Hickman
--------------------------------
J. Kenneth Hickman

/s/ Steven S. Kirkpatrick
--------------------------------
Steven S. Kirkpatrick

/s/ Gerald H. Newman
--------------------------------
Gerald H. Newman

/s/ Marc I. Perkins
--------------------------------
Marc I. Perkins

/s/ Robert Spiegel
--------------------------------
Robert Spiegel

/s/ Thomas M. Steinberg
--------------------------------
Thomas M. Steinberg
### §3131. Congressional statement of purpose

#### (a) Establishment of procedures for review and action

The purposes of this subchapter are to establish procedures for congressional review and action with respect to the Economic Report of the President (hereafter in this subchapter referred to as the "Economic Report"), the report of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and the other policies and provisions of this chapter and the Employment Act of 1946 [15 U.S.C. 1021 et seq.].

#### (b) Legislative action

The Congress shall initiate or develop such legislation as it deems necessary to implement proposals and objectives pursuant to this chapter and the Employment Act of 1946 [15 U.S.C. 1021 et seq.] after such modification in such proposals as it deems desirable. Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to prevent the Congress or any of its committees from considering or initiating at any time legislative action in furtherance of the goals and purposes of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 95–523, title III, §301, Oct. 27, 1978, 92 Stat. 1904.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subchapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this title", meaning title III of Pub. L. 95–523, Oct. 27, 1978, 92 Stat. 1904, which enacted this subchapter and amended sections 632 and 636 of Title 2, The Congress. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 3101 of this title and Tables.

For definition of "this chapter", referred to in text, see References in Text note set out under section 3102 of this title.

The Employment Act of 1946, referred to in subsecs. (a) and (b), is act Feb. 20, 1946, ch. 33, 60 Stat. 23, which is classified generally to chapter 21 (§1021 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1021 of this title and Tables.
### §636b. Disaster loan interest rates

Any loan made under section 636a 1 of this title and section 4452 1 of title 42 shall not exceed the current cost of repairing or replacing the disaster injury, loss, or damage in conformity with current codes and specifications. Any loan made under sections 636a 1 and 636d of this title, and sections 3538 and 4452 1 of title 42 shall bear interest at a rate determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, taking into consideration the current average market yield on outstanding marketable obligations of the United States with remaining periods to maturity of ten to twelve years reduced by not to exceed 2 per centum per annum. In no event shall any loan made under this section bear interest at a rate in excess of 6 per centum per annum.

(Pub. L. 91–606, title II, §234, Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1754.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 636a of this title, referred to in text, was repealed by Pub. L. 97–35, title XIX, §1917, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 781.

Section 4452 of title 42, referred to in text, was repealed by Pub. L. 93–24, §7, Apr. 20, 1973, 87 Stat. 25.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Disaster Relief Act of 1970, and not as part of the Small Business Act which comprises this chapter. Section was formerly classified to section 4453 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Dec. 31, 1970, see section 304 of Pub. L. 91–606, set out as an Effective Date of 1970 Amendment note under section 165 of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.

1 See References in Text note below.
**Exhibit        32.1**

|   | (1) | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities  Exchange                  Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |   |                                                                                             |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                Dated:            May 15, 2008     | By:    | /s/     Steven B. Rash                                        |   |
|                                                                                                                                                                                               |   | Steven B. Rash,Chairman and CEO (principle executive officer) |

----
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. WR-88,770-01 & WR-88,770-02

EX PARTE JAVARUSE RAYMONE HARDY, Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. W13-14092-I(A) & W13-14121-I(A) 

IN THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NUMBER TWO 

FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam. KELLER, P.J., and KEASLER, YEARY, and KEEL, JJ., dissent.

O P I N I O N

The prior opinion is withdrawn. Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas

Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications

for writs of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). 

Applicant was convicted of two counts of aggravated robbery and sentenced to twenty-four years’

imprisonment in each cause. The Eighth Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions. Hardy v. State,

Nos. 08-14-00044-CR and 08-14-00045-CR (Tex. App.—El Paso Feb. 14, 2015) (not designated

for publication).

Applicant contends that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance because he failed to
2

investigate and present mitigating evidence, specifically not calling favorable witnesses to testify

during sentencing in these cases. 

The trial court has determined that trial counsel’s performance was deficient and that such

deficient performance prejudiced Applicant. Relief is granted. The sentences in Cause Nos. F13-

14092-I and F13-14121-Iin the Criminal District Court Number Two of Dallas County are set aside,

and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Dallas County for a new punishment

hearing. The trial court shall issue any necessary bench warrant within 10 days after the mandate

of this Court issues.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: February 5, 2020

Do not publish
#### § 93.307 Articles accompanying horses.

No litter or manure, fodder or other aliment, nor any equipment such as boxes, buckets, ropes, chains, blankets, or other things used for or about horses governed under any law or regulation administered by the Secretary of Agriculture for prevention of the introduction or dissemination of any pests or diseases of livestock, shall be landed from any conveyance except under such restrictions as the inspector in charge at the port of entry shall direct.

[88 FR 63002, Sept. 14, 2023]
**Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 May 2011 – United Kingdom v Commission**

**(Case T-115/10)**

Action for annulment – Directive 92/43/EEC – Conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora – Decision 2010/45/EU – List of sites of Community importance for the Mediterranean biogeographical region – Measure not open to challenge – Measure merely confirmatory – Inadmissibility

1.                     *Actions for annulment – Action against a decision confirming an earlier decision not challenged within the time-limits – Inadmissibility
– Meaning of confirmatory decision – Decision adopted following a re-examination of the earlier decision and on the basis
of new factors – Not included (Art. 230 EC) (see paras 25, 27, 29-30, 33-34, 38, 41)*

2.                     *Procedure – Admissibility of actions – Judged by reference to the situation when the application was lodged – Action inadmissible
– Decision replacing the contested decision during the proceedings – No impact on assessment of the admissibility of the action
(see paras 46-48)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | APPLICATION for partial annulment of Commission Decision 2010/45/EU of 22 December 2009 adopting, pursuant to Council Directive 92/43/EEC, a third updated list of sites of Community importance for the Mediterranean biogeographical region (OJ 2010 L 30, p. 322) to the extent that it lists the site called ‘Estrecho oriental’ (under reference ES6120032) as a site of Community importance for the Mediterranean biogeographical region. |

**Operative part**

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland is ordered to pay the costs. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3. | | There is no need to rule on the Kingdom of Spain’s application for leave to intervene. |
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 August 10, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Rocco B. CommissoRocco B. CommissoChairman and Chief Executive OfficerBy:
    /s/ Mark E. StephanMark E. StephanExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 August 7, 2009
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Rocco B. CommissoRocco B. CommissoChairman and Chief Executive OfficerBy:
    
    /s/ Mark E. StephanMark E. StephanExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Stanley D. Piekos, certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q ofAugust Technology Corporation;

 

2.               Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               The registrant’sother certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5.               The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

 

a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

 
| Date:  May 5, 2004 | By:                      | /s/  STANLEY D. PIEKOS |   |
|--------------------|--------------------------|------------------------|--------|
|               | Stanley D. Piekos        |                   |
|               | Chief Financial  Officer |                   |

 

----
```
**CERTIFICATION**

I, Timothy Novak certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10QSB of Surgical Safety
   Products, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
   statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
   make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
   statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
   this annual report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
   information included in the this annual report, fairly present in all
   material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
   flows of the registrant as of, and for the periods presented in this annual
   report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
   establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures for the
   registrant and have:
        a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
           material information relating to the registrant, including the
           consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
           entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report
           is being prepared;
        b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
           and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing of this
           annual report; and
        c. Presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
           effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
           evaluation noted preceding;
5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
   our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors:
        a. All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
           controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
           record, process, summarize, and report financial data and have
           identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
           internal controls; and
        b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
           employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
           controls; and
6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
   annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls
   or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
   subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
   corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
   weaknesses.

Date:    August 12, 2003

                                                 /s/      Timothy Novak
                                                 By:      Timothy Novak
                                                 Title:   Chief Executive Officer
```
From:Brian Shrager/RTP/USEPA/US 

To:"Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

Cc:David Cozzie/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Jim 

 Eddinger/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date:11/07/2011 01:46 PM 

Subject:Re: Overview / One Pager of Boiler and CISWI rules 

Cortney, 

Attached is the one-pager that you requested for the boiler MACT. 

Thanks! 

Brian 

(See attached file: Boiler MACT OMB 1-Pager Describing Major 

Changes.docx) 

From:"Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

To:RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, David 

 Cozzie/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Cc:Brian Shrager/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Jim 

 Eddinger/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date:11/07/2011 10:20 AM 

Subject:Overview / One Pager of Boiler and CISWI rules 

Hi, 

Do you have a one page document that summarized the changes in the 

Boiler and CISWI rules? 

Many thanks, 

Cortney 

Page 1 of 1
(38 South. 877.)

No. 15,597.

#### MIX, Sheriff, v. HAWKINS.

(June 19, 1905.)

APPEAL — FILING RECORD — DISMISSAL.

1. The record of appeal was filed in this court a number of days after the return day.

2. Although the motion to dismiss the appeal was not made within three judicial days after the record was filed, the appeal must be dismissed. The failure to timely file the appeal is fatal to the appeal.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

Appeal from Twenty-Fifth Judicial District Court, Parish of Tangipahoa; Robert Raymond Reid, Judge.

Action by T. P. Mix, sheriff and tax collector, against J. F. Hawkins. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

Dismissed.

Robert S. Ellis, for appellant. Stephen Dudley Ellis and Guy Joseph Ray, for appellee.

BREAUX, C. J.

This rule taken by the tax collector was to compel the defendant to pay a license tax levied by the police jury. The rule was tried, and on the 25th day of .June, 1904, the judge of the district court rejected the demand of plaintiff in rule and dismissed the rule.

Plaintiff in rule obtained an order of appeal to this court, returnable on or before the 18th day of August, 1904. Plaintiff’s *14transcript of appeal was presented to the clerk of this court, and was filed by him on the 18th day of March following, a number of days after the return day. No extension of time was ever granted to appellant.

The question was carefully considered in MeDonogh v. De Gruys, 10 La. Ann. 75, and the view announced that the failure of the appellee to timely file the appeal is fatal to the appeal. It gives rise to the presumption of abandonment of the appeal. The court in that case affirmed Dwight, Curator, v. McMillen, 4 La. Ann. 350.

The court cites French v. Harrod, 9 La. Ann. 21, and other decisions rendered under earlier practice of this court.

All these decisions were practically affirmed in the comparatively recent case of Hudson v. Sheriff, 47 La. Ann. 1534, 18 South. 510.

The question came up in Hake v. Lee, 104 La; 147, 28 South. 1004.

It oifiy remains for us to dismiss the appeal.

The appeal is dismissed.
### §1693k. Compulsory use of electronic fund transfers

No person may—

(1) condition the extension of credit to a consumer on such consumer's repayment by means of preauthorized electronic fund transfers; or

(2) require a consumer to establish an account for receipt of electronic fund transfers with a particular financial institution as a condition of employment or receipt of a government benefit.

(Pub. L. 90–321, title IX, §913, as added Pub. L. 95–630, title XX, §2001, Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3737.)
§ 46.5 Covered entities. Entities to which the general rule in § 46.4(b) applies are the following: ( a ) Any investment bank, bank holding company, foreign bank or subsidiary thereof doing business in the United States, insurance company, or any other organization primarily engaged in the business of providing financial services or credit, a mutual savings bank, or a savings and loan association;
( b ) Any entity which is authorized by law to underwrite or participate in the marketing of securities of a public utility;
( c ) Any entity which produces or supplies electrical equipment or coal, natural gas, oil, nuclear fuel, or other fuel, for the use of any public utility;
( d ) Any entity specified in § 46.3;
( e ) Any entity referred to in section 305(b) of the Federal Power Act; and
( f ) Any entity which is controlled by any entity referred to in this section.
#### § 367.4212 Account 421.2, Loss on disposition of property.

This account must be charged with the loss on the sale, conveyance, exchange or transfer of service or other property to another. The reduction in income taxes relating to losses recorded in this account must be recorded in account 409.2, Income taxes, other income and deductions (§ 367.4092).
COACH YOUR KIDS THROUGH 

MORE THAN JUST HOMEWORK.

Spend time together to show you care about your child’s 

health, wellness, and success.

Talk to your children about the dangers of taking medication that doesn’t belong to 

them. For tips on how—and when—to begin the conversation, visit: 

www.underagedrinking.samhsa.gov

SMA-18-5090