alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §68h. Criminal penalty

Any person who willfully violates sections 68a, 68c, 68f, or 68g(b) of this title shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be fined not more than $5,000, or be imprisoned not more than one year, or both, in the discretion of the court: Provided, That nothing herein shall limit other provisions of this subchapter.

Whenever the Commission has reason to believe any person is guilty of a misdemeanor under this section, it shall certify all pertinent facts to the Attorney General, whose duty it shall be to cause appropriate proceedings to be brought for the enforcement of the provisions of this section against such person.

(Oct. 14, 1940, ch. 871, §10, 54 Stat. 1133.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of Federal Trade Commission, with certain exceptions, to Chairman of such Commission, see Reorg. Plan No. 8 of 1950, §1, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3175, 64 Stat. 1264, set out under section 41 of this title.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, each of the undersigned certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of TerreStar Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of TerreStar Corporation
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|            |  |     |  |                          
|----------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------
|May 6, 2010 |  | By: |  | /S/    JEFFREY W.
EPSTEIN
|            |  |     |  | Jeffrey W. Epstein       
|            |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer  
|            |  |    
|May 6, 2010 |  | By: |  | /S/    VINCENT
LOIACONO  
|            |  |     |  | Vincent Loiacono         
|            |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer  

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to TerreStar Corporation and will be retained by TerreStar Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
STATE OF NEBRASKA 

Pete Ricketts 

Governor DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 

Jim Macy 

Director 

April18, 2016 

Sui te 400, The Atrium 

12 00 'N ' Street 

P.O. Box 98922 

Lincoln, Nebraska 68509-8922 

Phone (402) 47 1-2 186 

FAX (402)47 1-2909 

webs ite: http://dcq.ne.gov 

Rebecca Weber 

Division Director 

Air & Waste Management Division 

EPA Region 7 

11201 Renner Blvd. 

Lenexa, KS 66219 

RE: Nebraska Sulfur Dioxide Designation 

Dear Ms. Weber: 

This submission from the Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality (NDEQ) is 

intended to supplement information previously provided in support of the initial 

designation of "unclassifiable" for the 2010 1-hour Sulfur Dioxide (S02) primary 

NAAQS for NPPD Sheldon Station in Lancaster County, NE. 

On September 18,2015, Pete Ricketts, Governor ofNebraska, submitted a designation 

recommendation to EPA for the 2010 1-hr S02 primary NAAQS. This recommendation 

specifically addressed: NPPD Sheldon Station, NPPD Gerald Gentleman Station, and 

OPPD Nebraska City Station. In the response letter we received from Region 7, dated 

February 16, 2016, EPA Region 7 agreed with our recommendations and invited 

comment from NDEQ through April 19,2016. Included with this letter is additional 

information for your consideration and review to support the "unclassifiable" designation 

for Sheldon Station. 

The attached documentation was received from NPPD and reflects actions they have 

taken to further comply with the 2010 1-hr S02 NAAQS for Sheldon Station. These 

attachments include construction permits for Units #1 and #2 (to raise stack heights and 

suspend operation until that modification is complete), and dispersion modeling data and 

analysis (to reflect projected emissions following the modification.) The modeling 

analysis was completed by an independent contractor for NPPD. 

An Equal Oppor/unily Employer 
If you have any questions regarding this submission, please contact me at (402) 471 -4299 

or Carrie Wiese, Grants Planning & Outreach Supervisor, at (402) 471 -6624. 

Sincerely, 

~ ... ~..,._....~ Shelley Schneider 

Administrator, Air Quality Division 

Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality 

Attachments: 

1. Cover letter from NPPD 

2. Construction permit, NPPD Sheldon Station, Unit #1 modification 

3. Construction permit, NPPD Sheldon Station, Unit #2 modification 

4. 1-Hour S02 Modeling Protocol, NPPD Sheldon Station 

5. 1-Hour S02 Modeling Report, NPPD Sheldon Station 

6. 1-Hour S02 Modeling Data (AEROMOD), NPPD Sheldon Station 

7. 1-Hour S02 Modeling Data (BPIP), NPPD Sheldon Station
### §80b–7. Material misstatements

It shall be unlawful for any person willfully to make any untrue statement of a material fact in any registration application or report filed with the Commission under section 80b–3 or 80b–4 of this title, or willfully to omit to state in any such application or report any material fact which is required to be stated therein.

(Aug. 22, 1940, ch. 686, title II, §207, 54 Stat. 853.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of Securities and Exchange Commission, with certain exceptions, to Chairman of such Commission, see Reorg. Plan No. 10 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3175, 64 Stat. 1265, set out under section 78d of this title.
§ 385.506 Examination of witnesses during hearing (Rule 506). ( a ) *Prepared written direct and rebuttal testimony.* Unless the presiding officer orders such testimony to be presented orally, direct and rebuttal testimony of a witness in a hearing must be prepared and submitted in written form, as required by Rule 507. Any witness submitting written testimony must be available for cross-examination, as provided in this subpart.
( b ) *Oral testimony during hearing.* Oral examination of a witness in a hearing must be conducted under oath and in the presence of the presiding officer, with opportunity for all participants to question the witness to the extent consistent with Rules 504(b)(17), 505, and 509(a).
###### Editorial Note on Part 0

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 0 appear at 73 FR 73 FR 54947, Sept. 24, 2008.

#### § 0.128 Organization.

The Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United States is a separate agency within the Department of Justice. It is composed of a full-time Chairman, and two part-time Commissioners. All functions, powers, and duties of the Commission not directly related to adjudicating claims are vested in the Chairman of the Commission, including the functions set forth in section 3 of Reorganization Plan No. 1 of 1954 and the authority to issue rules and regulations. The Attorney General provides necessary administrative support and services to the Commission.
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 
 TO THE

 GREIF, INC. 

2005 OUTSIDE DIRECTORS EQUITY AWARD PLAN 

The Greif, Inc. 2005 Outside Directors Equity Award Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended pursuant to the following provisions: 

1. Definitions: For the purposes of the Plan and this amendment, all capitalized terms used in this amendment which are not otherwise
defined herein shall have the respective meanings given such terms in the Plan. 
 2. Amendments: 

(a) Section 4 of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting the first sentence and adding the following in lieu thereof: 

“The total number of Shares reserved and available for issuance pursuant to Awards hereunder shall be Four Hundred Thousand (400,000)
Shares (“Available Shares”).” 
 (b) Section 6, subsection (a) of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following sentence
at the end thereof: 
 “The exercise price per Share of any Stock Option granted under the Plan shall not be changed or modified after
the time such Stock Option is granted unless such change or modification is made with the prior approval of the holders of a majority of the shares of Class B Common Stock of the Company.” 

(c) Section 6 of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following subsection (i): 

“(i.) No Stock Option Repurchases Without Shareholder Approval. 

The Committee shall not purchase Stock Options previously issued pursuant to the Plan from Participants for a share price
greater than the current fair market value per share unless such purchase is made with the prior approval of the holders of a majority of the shares of Class B Common Stock of the Company.” 

(d) Section 8, subsection (a) of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following sentence at the end thereof: 

“The grant price of an SAR Unit granted under the Plan shall not be changed or modified after the time such SAR Unit is granted unless
such change or modification is made with the prior approval of the holders of a majority of the shares of Class B Common Stock of the Company.” 

(e) Section 23 of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: 

“Section 23. Term of Plan. 

No Awards shall be granted pursuant to the Plan unless and until approval of the Plan by the stockholders of the Company. No
Awards shall be granted pursuant to the Plan on or after the twentieth anniversary of the Effective Date, but Awards granted prior to such twentieth anniversary may extend beyond that date.” 







 (f) The following Section 27 is hereby added to the Plan: 

“Section 27. Ratification of 2015 Awards. 

The awards made to outside directors on March 3, 2015 following the 2015 annual meeting of stockholders are ratified and
approved.” 
 3. Effective Date; Construction: The effective date of this amendment is March 1, 2016 and this amendment
shall be deemed to be part of the Plan as of such date. In the event of any inconsistencies between the provisions of the Plan and this amendment, the provisions of this amendment shall control. Except as modified by this amendment, the Plan shall
continue in full force and effect without change. 

  
 2
### §5413. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–113, §11(j), Mar. 7, 1996, 110 Stat. 782

Section, Pub. L. 101–592, §14, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 2952, related to appointment of an advisory committee to be available for consultation with Secretary on matters related to fasteners.
### NJ 126 Petition of 9/17/10 Proposed Rule : Air Quality Modeling Data DVD

EPA has placed in the docket a DVD containing certa in air quality modeling data files that were used for the NJ126 Petition proposal.

Information on the air quality modeling performe d in support of this proposed rule, including a summary of the model inputs and results, can be found in the Air Quality Modeling Technical Support Document that is locate d in the NJ126 Petition docket.

The following information is contained on this data DVD:

I. AERMET meteorological preprocessor files

a. AERMET runstream files for Portland Plant site-specific meteorological data with adjusted measurement heights b. Raw upper air, NWS surface, and Port land Plant site-specific meteorological input files

c. AERMET surface and profile output files (for input to AERMOD) II. AERMAP terrain preprocessor files

a. AERMAP runstream files for initial c oarse receptor grid and fine receptor grid b. Raw NED terrain input data file

c. AERMAP receptor output files with recepto r elevations and hill height scales for initial coarse recepto r grid and fine receptor grid (for input to AERMOD) III. Ambient SO2 data for Chester, NJ mo nitor for 2007-2009 used for determining monitored background concentrations for cumulative modeling analyses IV. AERMOD model input files

a. AERMOD runstream files for initia l coarse receptor grid analysis b. AERMOD runstream files for fine receptor grid analysis

c. AERMOD runstream files for fine receptor grid analysis with remedy V. AERMOD model output files

a. AERMOD output files for initial coarse receptor grid analysis b. AERMOD output files for fi ne receptor grid analysis

c. AERMOD output files for fine rec eptor grid analysis with remedy

Requests for electronic copies of the NJ126 Petition air quality mode ling data should be sent to Roger Brode ( brode.roger@epa.gov ) or Brian Timin ( timin.brian@epa.gov ).
U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1 

49–011 2015

114th Congress, 1st Session – – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 114–20 

RESPONSE TO THE MILITARY COMPENSATION AND 

RETIREMENT MODERNIZATION COMMISSION’S RECOMMENDATIONS 

COMMUNICATION 

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 

TRANSMITTING

A LETTER REGARDING THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE MILITARY COMPENSATION AND RETIREMENT MODERNIZATION COMMISSION 

APRIL 13, 2015.—Referred to the Committee on Armed Services and 

ordered to be printed 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARINGE:\Seals\Congress.#13

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING
(1) 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, March 30, 2015. 

Hon. JOHN BOEHNER, 

Speaker of the House of Representatives, 

Washington, DC. 

DEAR MR. SPEAKER: After having reviewed the recommendations 

proposed by the Military Compensation and Retirement Modernization Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’), I believe the recommendations are an important step forward in protecting the long-term viability of the All-Volunteer Force, improving quality-of-life for service members and their families, and ensuring the fiscal sustainability of the military compensation and retirement systems. Our 

men and women in uniform and their families deserve nothing less, 

and I thank the Commission for its work. 

My Administration fully supports the underlying objectives of 

each of the Commission’s 15 recommendations. Upon receipt of 

these recommendations, I directed my team to consider these recommendations and to work with the Commission to adopt or refine 

the specific proposals in as many instances as possible. Given the 

complexity of military compensation and retirement programs and 

our solemn responsibility to ensure that any changes further the 

objectives above, I will report to the Congress by April 30, 2015, 

on the initial results of this work and with proposals that I recommend be enacted without delay; subsequent analysis may be 

needed for some of the recommendations. 

Sincerely, 

BARACK OBAMA. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING
#### Emma Brenkus, Appellant-Respondent, v Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al., Respondents-Appellants.

[823 NYS2d 719]

Appeal and cross appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Joseph G. Makowski, J.), entered July 27, 2005. The order, after a nonjury trial, among other things, denied the motion of plaintiff for leave to amend the complaint and/or to conform her pleadings to the proof and granted judgment in favor of plaintiff based on defendants’ violation of General Business Law § 349.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court. Present—Scudder, J.E, Kehoe, Martoche and Green, JJ.
| 1. | I      have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of      MFRI, Inc.; and for the year ended January 31,  2010. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this      report; |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/      Michael D. Bennett |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|
#### § 701.100 Field Directors.

The Council may employ as professional staff Field Directors who shall be designated as chairmen of committees or groups established by the Council to develop and prepare regional or river basin assessments or plans. Such Field Directors shall perform their official functions at locations established by the Council.
s130029.eng INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT SNUN:13-0029 Focus Ready Draft 7/11/2013

MSDS: No Label: No TLV/PEL: MSDS not included with submission.

Page 1s130029.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT SNUN:13-0029

Page 2s130029.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT SNUN:13-0029

Page 3s130029.eng

Page 4
### §§4211 to 4215. Repealed. Pub. L. 102–555, §4, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4166

Section 4211, Pub. L. 98–365, title II, §201, July 17, 1984, 98 Stat. 453, related to operation and data marketing of Landsat system by Secretary of Commerce and provided for Secretary's authority to contract.

Section 4212, Pub. L. 98–365, title II, §202, July 17, 1984, 98 Stat. 454; Pub. L. 100–147, title III, §304, Oct. 30, 1987, 101 Stat. 876, related to Secretary's authority to contract for marketing of unenhanced data.

Section 4213, Pub. L. 98–365, title II, §203, July 17, 1984, 98 Stat. 454, related to conditions of competition for contract to market unenhanced data.

Section 4214, Pub. L. 98–365, title II, §204, July 17, 1984, 98 Stat. 455, related to sale of unenhanced data, entitlement to revenues from such sales, and the permissibility of marketing such data after end of Landsat system space segment.

Section 4215, Pub. L. 98–365, title II, §205, July 17, 1984, 98 Stat. 455, related to supply of unenhanced data to foreign ground stations and contract provisions relating thereto.
§ 375.304 Delegations to the Chief Administrative Law Judge. ( a ) The Commission authorizes the Chief Administrative Law Judge and the Administrative Law Judge designated by the Chief Administrative Law Judge to exercise the power granted to a Presiding Officer by part 385, particularly § 385.504 of this chapter.
( b ) The Commission authorizes the Chief Administrative Law Judge to ( 1 ) For those proceedings pending under subpart E of part 385 of this chapter: ( i ) Consolidate for hearing two or more proceedings on any or all issues,
( ii ) Sever two or more proceedings or issues in a proceeding,
( iii ) Designate and substitute presiding officers, and
( iv ) Extend any close or record date ordered by the Commission in a proceeding for good cause, and
( v ) Set or extend procedural time standards, including but not limited to hearing, briefing and initial decision dates, including dates set by the Commission, unless the Commission states otherwise in its hearing order.
( 2 ) For proceedings under subparts I and J of part 385 of this chapter, designate presiding officers who will have all the authorities and duties vested in presiding officers by those rules and other applicable rules in conducting proceedings pursuant to sections 503(c) and 504(b)(1) of the Department of Energy Organization Act, 42 U.S.C. 7193(c) and 7194(b)(1) (1982).
( 3 ) Deny or grant, in whole or in part, petitions for waivers of fees prescribed in §§ 381.303 and 381.304 of this chapter in accordance with § 381.106 of this chapter.
( c ) The Commission authorizes the Chief Administrative Law Judge, and the Administrative Law Judge designated by the Chief Administrative Law Judge to serve as a settlement judge for a proceeding, to certify to the Commission uncontested offers of settlement.
[Order 492, 53 FR 16063, May 5, 1988, as amended by Order 629, 68 FR 6609, Feb. 10, 2003; Order 883, 87 FR 31730, May 25, 2022]
### §290b. Collection, compilation, critical evaluation, publication and dissemination of standard reference data

The Secretary is authorized and directed to provide or arrange for the collection, compilation, critical evaluation, publication, and dissemination of standard reference data. In carrying out this program, the Secretary shall, to the maximum extent practicable, utilize the reference data services and facilities of other agencies and instrumentalities of the Federal Government and of State and local governments, persons, firms, institutions, and associations, with their consent and in such a manner as to avoid duplication of those services and facilities. All agencies and instrumentalities of the Federal Government are encouraged to exercise their duties and functions in such manner as will assist in carrying out the purpose of this chapter. This section shall be deemed complementary to existing authority, and nothing herein is intended to repeal, supersede, or diminish existing authority or responsibility of any agency or instrumentality of the Federal Government.

(Pub. L. 90–396, §3, July 11, 1968, 82 Stat. 340.)
U.S.Deportment

of Transportation

federal Aviation

Administration

April 26, 2010

Donna DeBuhr

Engineering Specialist

Cessna Aircraft Company

One Cessna Boulevard

P.O. Box 7704

Wichita, Kansas 67277-7704

Dear Ms. DeBuhr:

Transport Airplane Directorate

1601 Lind Ave. SW.

Renton, Washington 98057-3356

We have received your petition, dated March I, 2010. In that letter, you requested an

exemption from the requirements of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)

25.1447(c)(I) and 25.841(b)(6) for Cessna Model 680 airplanes. In a follow up email to

Robert Hetlman, dated April 15,2010, you clanfied that Cessna seeks an exemption for

§ 25.1447(c)(I) only, and that § 25.841(b)(6) would be addressed with an equivalent level of

safety (ELOS) finding.

Your request, which we sent to the Department of Transportation's Federal Document

Management System on your behalf, will be processed by this office. Please refer to Docket

No. FAA-2010-0290.

We have deternlined that good cause exists for waiving the publication and COllll11ent

procedures included in 14 CFR part 11. Although we have waived the publication and

comment period pursuant to your petition, you should not conStrue this action to be tacit

approval of your request. We will consider the facts and circJmstances contained in your

petition and will make every effort to process it in an expeditit,us manner.

If you have any questions or concerns regarding your petition or the petition process, please

contact Robert Hettman, (425) 227-2683, robert.hettman@famgov.

Tn,ty-(c JJ JJr9-0

Maria G. Delgado

Transport Standards Staff

Transport Airplane Directorate

Aircraft Certification Service

[type the blame line here, ifany]