alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           5,126
<SECURITIES>                                   105,087
<RECEIVABLES>                                  117,871
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,393
<INVENTORY>                                      1,377
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               239,694
<PP&E>                                         325,285
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,400
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 543,078
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           93,221
<BONDS>                                        347,860
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           335
<OTHER-SE>                                      97,338
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   543,078
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                70,691
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   42,778
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   759
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,533
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    390
<INCOME-TAX>                                       186
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                204
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       204
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01


</TABLE>
# C_2011013EN.01002902.xml

| 15.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/29

---

Action brought on 1 November 2010 — Hamberger Industriewerke v OHIM (Atrium)

(Case T-513/10)

()

2011/C 13/57

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Hamberger Industriewerke GmbH (Stephanskirchen, Germany) (represented by T. Schmidpeter, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 26 August 2010 in Case R 291/2010-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 26 August 2010 in Case R 291/2010-4;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs, including the costs incurred in the course of the appeal procedure. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs, including the costs incurred in the course of the appeal procedure.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘Atrium’ for goods in Classes 19 and 27.

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Application refused.

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (1), as the Community trade mark concerned is distinctive and not merely descriptive.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

1

---
### §80c–2. Authorization of appropriations

For fiscal year 1982, and for each of the three succeeding fiscal years, there are hereby authorized to be appropriated such amounts as may be necessary and appropriate to carry out the provisions and purposes of this chapter. Any sums so appropriated shall remain available until expended.

(Pub. L. 96–477, title V, §504, Oct. 21, 1980, 94 Stat. 2292.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1981, see section 507 of Pub. L. 96–477, set out as a note under section 80c of this title.
CHARLES MICHAEL 

BARTON,

Appellant,

v.

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. 

SUCCESSOR, MERGER TO 

BAC HOME LOANS 

SERVICING, LP,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-2041

_____________________________/

Opinion filed February 9, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County.

Keith Brace, Judge.

Charles Michael Barton, pro se, Appellant.

James Randolph Liebler, Tricia Julie Duthiers, and Joshua Robert Levine of 

Liebler, Gonzalez & Portuondo, Miami; Tripp Scott of Tripp Scott, P.A., Fort 

Lauderdale; and William Noriega, Clearwater, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, RAY, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 November 14, 2005
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Rocco B. CommissoRocco B. CommissoChief Executive OfficerBy:
    
    /s/ Mark E. StephanMark E. StephanPrincipal Financial Officer
### SUBCHAPTER I—CYBERSECURITY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Memorandum To: Docket ID Number EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2010

- 0505 for Oil and Natural Gas

Sector: Emission Standards for New and Modified Sources

Re: EPA meeting with Sierra Club, Blue Green Alliance, Moms Clean Air

Task Force , and other Environmental Groups

Message: EPA met with representatives from multiple environmental groups on November 4

, 2015, to discuss the recent oil and gas proposals. These organizations come from the states of

Colorado, Michigan, Montana, North Dakota, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Ohio,

Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Virginia, and Washington DC.

Attendees:

Jessica Eckdish, Sierra ClubEPA

Sarah Dunham, Paul Gunning, Pamela Franklin, Suzanne Waltzer, Mark DeFigueiredo,

David Cozzie, Bruce Moore, Amy Hambrick

Attachments: 2
Exhibit 99.2

                      STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2002 (the "Form 10-K") of  Middleburg  Financial  Corporation  (the
"Company"),  I, Alice P. Frazier,  Executive Vice President and Chief  Financial
Officer,  hereby certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (a)  the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (b)  the  information  contained in the Form 10-K fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,   the  consolidated   financial  condition  and  results  of
operations  of the  Company  and its  subsidiaries  as of, and for,  the periods
presented in the Form 10-K.


Date:  March 28, 2003                        /s/ Alice P. Frazier
                                             ----------------------------------
                                             Alice P. Frazier
                                             Executive Vice President
                                             and Chief Financial Officer







[A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Middleburg Financial  Corporation and will be retained by Middleburg
Financial Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.]
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 701 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 701

  To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to reauthorize the 
            Chesapeake Bay Program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 7, 2019

Mr. Cardin (for himself and Mrs. Capito) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to reauthorize the 
            Chesapeake Bay Program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Chesapeake Bay Program 
Reauthorization Act''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF CHESAPEAKE BAY PROGRAM.

    Section 117 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 
1267) is amended by striking subsection (j) and inserting the 
following:
    ``(j) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section--
            ``(1) for fiscal year 2020, $90,000,000;
            ``(2) for fiscal year 2021, $90,500,000;
            ``(3) for fiscal year 2022, $91,000,000;
            ``(4) for fiscal year 2023, $91,500,000; and
            ``(5) for fiscal year 2024, $92,000,000.''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-74704, 333-84548 and 333-82350) and Form S-8
(Nos. 333-69318, 333-71504, 333-76042, 333-82348 and 333-112345) of Regent
Communications, Inc. of our report dated March 8, 2004 relating to the financial
statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Cincinnati, Ohio
March 12, 2004
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
pertaining to (i) the Columbus Realty Trust 1993 Share Bonus Plan (Form S-8 No.
33-76774), (ii) the Columbus Realty Trust Bonus Plan (No.2) (Form S-8 No. 33-
90492), (iii) the Columbus Realty Trust 1993 Share Option Plan (Form S-8 No. 33-
95918), (iv) the Columbus Realty Trust Employee Stock Purchase Plan (Form S-8
No. 33-94798), (v) the Columbus Realty Trust Long Term Management Incentive Plan
(Form S-8 No. 333-02276), (vi) the Columbus Realty Trust Employee Incentive Plan
(Form S-8 No. 333-22307), (vii) the registration statement on Form S-3 No. 33-
88672 of Columbus Realty Trust and in the related Prospectus, (viii) the
registration statement on Form S-3 No. 33-90146 of Columbus Realty Trust and in
the related Prospectus, (ix) the registration statement on  Form S-3 No. 333-
09775 of Columbus Realty Trust and in the related Prospectus our report dated
January 28, 1997 (except for Note 15, as to which the date is March 7, 1997)
with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Columbus
Realty Trust included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1996.


                                             ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Dallas, Texas
March 7, 1997
# C_2010288EN.01004901.xml

| 23.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/49

---

Action brought on 23 August 2010 — Hartmann v OHMI — Mölnlycke Health Care (MESILETTE)

(Case T-342/10)

()

(2010/C 288/92)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Paul Hartmann AG (Heidenheim, Germany) (represented by: N. Aicher, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Mölnlycke Health Care AB (Göteborg, Sweden)

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 20 May 2010 in case R 1222/2009-2, and; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 20 May 2010 in case R 1222/2009-2, and;

| — | Order the defendant to bear the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to bear the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘MESILETTE’, for goods in class 5 — Community trade mark application No 6494025

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Mark or sign cited: German trade mark registration No 1033551 of the word mark ‘MEDINETTE’, for goods in class 25; International trade mark registration No 486204 of the word mark ‘MEDINETTE’, for goods in class 25

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal made an incorrect assessment of the likelihood of confusion, in particular of the similarity of the signs.

---
5600 Fishers Lane • Rockville, MD 20857

www.samhsa.gov • 1‐877‐SAMHSA‐7 (1‐877‐726‐4727)

December 14, 2021 

Dear Colleague: 

The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), Center for 

Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT), Division of Pharmacologic Therapies (DPT) reviews and 

approves requests for patient exceptions under the Federal Opioid Treatment Regulations [42 

CFR § 8.12 (i)]. In response to requests for the upcoming federal holidays and ensuing 

weekends (December 24th, 25th, and 26th and December 31st, Jan 1st, and Jan 2nd), this letter is to 

provide guidance regarding requests for unsupervised doses of medication for patients for these 

dates. In general, the following is subject to state law and State Opioid Treatment Authority 

(SOTA) approval. 

Program-wide requests for exceptions for the observance of these federal holidays and ensuing 

weekends may be submitted via the Opioid Treatment Program (OTP) extranet. In the 

comments section of the form, please specify the arrangements for patients not receiving 

unsupervised doses. Also, in the comment section, please provide the total number of patients for 

which you are seeking an exception request. Attached is a sample holiday closure submission. 

OTP medical directors are reminded that appropriate alternative arrangements for medication 

continuity need to be made for patients in whom therapeutic benefits of unsupervised doses of 

medication do not outweigh safety risks. 

In addition, as a reminder, SAMHSA’s OTP Guidance issued March 16, 2020, allowed states to 

request a blanket exception for all stable patients in an OTP to receive up to 28 days of 

unsupervised doses of medication and up to 14 days of unsupervised doses of medication for 

patients who are less stable but who the OTP medical director believes can safely handle. OTPs 

in states that did not request this exception are expected to adhere to the federal regulatory 

criteria for unsupervised doses and request exceptions on behalf of all patients for dates when the 

clinic is closed. 

Sincerely, 

/Yngvild Olsen/

Yngvild K. Olsen, MD, MPH 

Acting Director 

Center for Substance Abuse Treatment 

Behavioral Health is Essential to Health • Prevention Works • Treatment is Effective • People Recover
**Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 May 2012 —
Wohlfahrt v OHIM — Ferrero (Kindertraum)

(Case T‐580/10)**

Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark Kindertraum — Earlier national word mark Kinder — Relative ground for refusal — Proof of use of the earlier trade mark — Article 42(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009

Community trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark — Relative grounds for refusal — Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services — Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 41, 47-54)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 October 2010 (Case R 815/2009‐4) relating to opposition proceedings between Ferrero SpA and Mr Harald Wohlfahrt. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders Mr Harald Wohlfahrt to pay the costs. |
# C_2017369EN.01001802.xml

| 30.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 369/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 369/18

---

Order of the General Court of 13 September 2017 — Germany v Commission

(Case T-116/10) (1)

1

((Action for annulment - ERDF - Reduction of financial assistance - North Rhine-Westphalia Programme - Failure to comply with the time-limit for adopting a decision - Infringement of essential procedural requirements - Action manifestly well founded))

(2017/C 369/27)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented initially by J. Möller, subsequently by J. Möller and T. Henze, acting as Agents, and U. Karpenstein, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B.-R. Killmann, B. Conte and A. Steiblytė, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 10675 of 23 December 2009 reducing the assistance granted to the Objective 2 North Rhine-Westphalia Programme (1997-1999) in the Federal Republic of Germany from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) under Commission Decision C(97)1120 of 7 May 1997.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | Commission Decision C(2009) 10675 of 23 December 2009 reducing the assistance granted to the Objective 2 North Rhine-Westphalia Programme (1997-1999) in the Federal Republic of Germany from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) under Commission Decision C(97)1120 of 7 May 1997 is annulled. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Commission Decision C(2009) 10675 of 23 December 2009 reducing the assistance granted to the Objective 2 North Rhine-Westphalia Programme (1997-1999) in the Federal Republic of Germany from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) under Commission Decision C(97)1120 of 7 May 1997 is annulled.

| 2. | The European Commission is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Commission is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 134, 22.5.2010.

1

---
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

The Board of Directors

Orthovita, Inc.: 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos. 333-66681, 333-90981, 333-100034, 333-107282, 333-118219, 333-131667, 333-145723, 333-151977 and 333-161313) on Form S-8 and in the Registration Statements (Nos. 333-47386, 333-59288,333-84632, 333-88334, 333-100341, 333-107210, 333-111697, 333-118216, 333-131668, 333-145724 and 333-141403) on Form S-3 of Orthovita, Inc. and subsidiaries of our reports dated March 16, 2011, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets ofOrthovita, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and comprehensive loss and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period endedDecember 31, 2010, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, which reports appear in the December 31, 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Orthovita, Inc. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

March 16, 2011
# C_2012151EN.01002802.xml

| 26.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 151/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 151/28

---

Order of the General Court of 29 March 2012 — Asociación Española de Banca v European Commission

(Case T-236/10) (1)

1

(Actions for annulment - State aid - Aid schemes allowing for the tax amortisation of financial goodwill for foreign shareholding acquisitions - Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market and not ordering the recovery of aid - Association - Lack of individual concern - Inadmissibility)

2012/C 151/46

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Asociación Española de Banca (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J. Buendía Sierra, E. Abad Valdenebro, M. Muñoz de Juan and R. Calvo Salinero, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal and C. Urraca Caviedes, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Article 1(1) and, alternatively, Article 4 of Commission Decision 2011/5/EC of 28 October 2009 on the tax amortisation of financial goodwill for foreign shareholding acquisitions C 45/07 (ex NN 51/07, ex CP 9/07) implemented by Spain (OJ 2011 L 7, p. 48).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Asociación Española de Banca is to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Asociación Española de Banca is to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 195, 17.7.2010.

1

---
### §715k. Saving clause

If any provision of this chapter, or the application thereof to any person or circumstance, shall be held invalid, the validity of the remainder of the chapter and the application of such provision to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby.

(Feb. 22, 1935, ch. 18, §12, 49 Stat. 33.)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
     Exhibit 77(0) Morgan  Stanley Dean Witter  Municipal  Income  Opportunities
     Trust 10f-3 transactions for the period November 1, 1998 - May 31, 1999

<S>                                <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>        <C>

                                                                          TOTAL
                                                                          ISSUED/
                                   DATE      PRICE    SHARES     % of     PRINCIPAL   PURCHASE
SECURITY                           PURCHASED SHARE    PURCHASED  ASSETS   AMOUNT      BY GROUP  BROKER(S)
Chicago,IL,O'Hare INTL Airport
 - United Airlines Inc. SER 1999A  2/4/99    $100.00  2,350,000  1.268%   $161,695,000 1.53%    JP Morgan,
                                                                                                Loop Capital,
                                                                                                Ramirez
Michigan Municipal Bond Authority,
 School Ser 1998                  11/6/98    $104.44  2,000,000  2.826%   $304,970,000 3.279%   Salomon Smith
                                                                                                Barney

</TABLE>