alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012355EN.01000702.xml

| 17.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 355/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 355/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 September 2012 — Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej and Republic of Poland v European Commission

(Joined Cases C-422/11 P and C-423/11 P) (1)

1

(Appeals - Actions for annulment - Rejection of the appeal as inadmissible - Representation before the Courts of the European Union - Lawyer - Independence)

2012/C 355/11

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Parties

Appellants: Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej (represented by: D. Dziedzic-Chojnacka and D. Pawłowska, radcowie prawni), Republic of Poland (represented by: M. Szpunar, A. Kraińska and D. Lutostańska, acting as Agents)

Appellants:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: G. Braun and A. Stobiecka-Kuik, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeals brought against the order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 23 May 2011 in Case T-226/10 Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej v Commission by which the Court declared inadmissible the action of the Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej for annulment of Commission Decision C(2010) 1234 of 3 March 2010, adopted pursuant to Article 7(4) of Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2002 L 108, p. 33), ordering the Polish regulatory authority in the field of electronic communications services and postal services to withdraw two notified draft measures concerning the national wholesale market for IP traffic exchange (IP transit) (Case PL/2009/1019) and the wholesale market for IP peering with the network of Telekomunikacja Polska S.A. (TP) (Case PL/2009/1020) — Incorrect interpretation of the third and fourth paragraphs of Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice, in conjunction with the first paragraph of Article 53 of the Statute, and also with the sixth paragraph of Article 254 of the FEU Treaty and Article 113 of the Rules of Procedure — Infringement of Article 67(1) of the FEU Treaty, in conjunction with Article 113 of the Rules of Procedure — Infringement of Article 5(1) and (2) of the EU Treaty, in conjunction with Article 4(1) of the EU Treaty and Article 113 of the Rules of Procedure — Infringement of Article 5(4) of the EU Treaty, in conjunction with Article 113 of the Rules of Procedure — Failure to state reasons — Inadmissibility of an action in the event of representation by lawyers in an employment relationship with the party

Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeals; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeals;

| 2. | Orders the Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej and the Republic of Poland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej and the Republic of Poland to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 311, 22.10.2011.

1

---
#### Calvin TABOR’S EXECUTOR, Movant, v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Opposed.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Oct. 3, 1939.

Charles Ferguson for movant.

R. M. Shelbourne, opposed.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal denied; judgment affirmed.
# C_2012366EN.01001901.xml

| 24.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 366/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 366/19

---

Order of the Court of 12 July 2012 — Power-One Italy SpA v European Commission

(Case C-372/11 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Non-contractual liability - Project co-funded by the financial instrument ‘LIFE’ - Development of a new system of supplying power for use in mobile telephony (‘Pneuma project’) - Commission decision to end the project and to recover the advance paid - Compensation for the loss allegedly sustained)

2012/C 366/31

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Power-One Italy SpA (represented by: R. Giuffrida and A. Giussani, avvocati)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: P. Oliver and D. Recchia, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 May 2011 in Case T-489/08 Power-One Italy v Commission by which that court dismissed an action for compensation for the loss allegedly sustained by the appellant following the Commission’s decision to end the Pneuma project (LIFE04 ENV/IT/000595) intended to co-fund development of a new system of supplying power for use in mobile telephony — Legitimate expectations — Obligation to state reasons

Power-One Italy

Commission

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Power-One Italy SpA is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Power-One Italy SpA is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 282, 24.09.2011.

1

---
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 20

- 11187 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**

Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus

**Larry James Miears,**

Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:20

- CR

- 12

- 1

Before **Higginbotham, Higginson,** and **Duncan,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *

The attorney appointed to represent Larry James Miears has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders

v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Miears has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 28, 2021
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-11187 Document: 00516033395 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/28/2021No. 20

- 11187

2 brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
**G RANTED**  , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
the **APPEAL IS DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2

. Case: 20-11187 Document: 00516033395 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/28/2021
### §3710b. Rewards for scientific, engineering, and technical personnel of Federal agencies

The head of each Federal agency that is making expenditures at a rate of more than $50,000,000 per fiscal year for research and development in its Government-operated laboratories shall use the appropriate statutory authority to develop and implement a cash awards program to reward its scientific, engineering, and technical personnel for—

(1) inventions, innovations, computer software, or other outstanding scientific or technological contributions of value to the United States due to commercial application or due to contributions to missions of the Federal agency or the Federal government,1 or

(2) exemplary activities that promote the domestic transfer of science and technology development within the Federal Government and result in utilization of such science and technology by American industry or business, universities, State or local governments, or other non-Federal parties.

(Pub. L. 96–480, §13, as added and renumbered §12, Pub. L. 99–502, §§6, 9(e)(1), Oct. 20, 1986, 100 Stat. 1792, 1797; renumbered §13, Pub. L. 100–418, title V, §5122(a)(1), Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1438; amended Pub. L. 100–519, title III, §302, Oct. 24, 1988, 102 Stat. 2597.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1988—Par. (1). Pub. L. 100–519 inserted "computer software," after "inventions, innovations,".

1 So in original. Probably should be capitalized.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Pamela J. Montpelier, hereby certify that:

(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Service Bancorp, Inc.;

(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4) The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business
issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and

(5) The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability
to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal controls over financial reporting.



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/ PAMELA J. MONTPELIER
|Pamela J. Montpelier    
|Chief Executive Officer 
|May 15, 2008
Recordkeeping Aid for Direct Marketers with Price Information

1. Insured’s Name 2. Date

3. Name of Market 4. Total Cash Receipts

5. Commodity 6. Amount 

Taken To 

Market

7. Amount 

Returned 

Home

8. Amount 

Sold

9. Today’s 

Price

10. Revenue By 

Commodity

11. TOTAL

12. Remarks:
This is an aid that can be used to record daily direct-market sales. This is not a required form. 

It is intended as an example of how daily sales could be recorded in a way that is acceptable for 

WFRP purposes. By keeping the information shown on this record the producer may be allowed 

to use the data from this record to calculate the 3-year average farm price for future use for 

WFRP insurance.

Item Required Element Description

1 Insured’s Name Name of insured as shown on the application

2 Date Date the commodity was taken to market

3 Name Of Market Name of the market where the commodity was sold.

4 Total Cash Receipts Total cash receipts for the day from all commodities taken 

to the market.

5 Commodity Name of the commodity. If there are multiple types of a 

commodity that have different sale prices, each commodity 

should be listed on a separate line,

6 Amount Taken To 

Market

Total amount of the commodity that was taken to the 

market for sale on the date listed in (2.) above. Use the 

units in which you measure each commodity (e.g. bushels, 

pounds, baskets, etc.)

7 Amount Returned Home Total amount of the commodity that remained unsold at the 

end of the day and was returned to the farm on the date 

listed in (2.) above. Do not include the unit name.

8 Amount Sold Total amount of the commodity sold at the market on the 

date listed in (2.) above (Item 6 - item 7). 

9 Today’s Price Sale price for the commodity for the day. 

10 Revenue By Commodity Revenue from the commodity sold for the day (Item 8 X 

Item 9).

11 Total Total amount of revenue from the sale of all commodities 

for the day. This amount must match the entry in item 4 

above.

12 Remarks Enter any remarks pertinent to the sale of the commodities.
### §70c. Removal of stamp, tag, label, or other identification

#### (a) Removal or mutilation after shipment in commerce

After shipment of a textile fiber product in commerce it shall be unlawful, except as provided in this subchapter, to remove or mutilate, or cause or participate in the removal or mutilation of, prior to the time any textile fiber product is sold and delivered to the ultimate consumer, any stamp, tag, label, or other identification required by this subchapter to be affixed to such textile fiber product, and any person violating this section shall be guilty of an unfair method of competition, and an unfair or deceptive act or practice, under the Federal Trade Commission Act [15 U.S.C. 41 et seq.].

#### (b) Substitution of stamp, tag, etc.

Any person—

(1) introducing, selling, advertising, or offering for sale, in commerce, or importing into the United States, a textile fiber product subject to the provisions of this subchapter, or

(2) selling, advertising, or offering for sale a textile fiber product whether in its original state or contained in other textile fiber products, which has been shipped, advertised, or offered for sale, in commerce,

may substitute for the stamp, tag, label, or other means of identification required to be affixed to such textile product pursuant to section 70b(b) of this title, a stamp, tag, label, or other means of identification conforming to the requirements of section 70b(b) of this title, and such substituted stamp, tag, label, or other means of identification shall show the name or other identification issued and registered by the Commission of the person making the substitution.

#### (c) Affixing of stamp, tag, etc. to individual unit of broken package

If any person other than the ultimate consumer breaks a package which bears a stamp, tag, label, or other means of identification conforming to the requirements of section 70b of this title, and if such package contains one or more units of a textile fiber product to which a stamp, tag, label, or other identification conforming to the requirements of section 70b of this title is not affixed, such person shall affix a stamp, tag, label, or other identification bearing the information on the stamp, tag, label, or other means of identification attached to such broken package to each unit of textile fiber product taken from such broken package.

(Pub. L. 85–897, §5, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1720.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal Trade Commission Act, referred to in subsec. (a), is act Sept. 26, 1914, ch. 311, 38 Stat. 717, which is classified generally to subchapter I (§41 et seq.) of this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 58 of this title and Tables.
# C_2011252EN.01002807.xml

| 27.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/28

---

Order of the President of the Court of 21 June 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Ragusa (Italy)) — Criminal proceedings against Mohamed Mrad

(Case C-60/11) (1)

1

2011/C 252/66

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 113, 9.4.2011.

1

---
**Order of the President of the General Court of 26 March 2010 – SNF v ECHA**

**(Case T-1/10 R)**

Proceedings for interim measures – REACH – Identification of acrylamide as a substance of very high concern – Application for suspension of operation of the measure and for interim relief – No urgency

1.                     *Application for interim measures – Suspension of operation of a measure – Interim measures – Conditions for granting – Prima
facie case – Urgency – Serious and irreparable damage – Cumulative nature (Arts 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU; Rules of Procedure
of the General Court, Art. 104(2)) (see paras 21-24)*

2.                     *Application for interim measures – Suspension of operation of a measure – Interim measures – Conditions for granting – Urgency
– Serious and irreparable damage – Burden of proof (Arts 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art.
104(2)) (see paras 47-48, 66-67)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | APPLICATION for suspension of operation of the decision identifying acrylamide as a substance of very high concern stated to have been adopted by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) on 7 December 2009 pursuant to Article 59 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC (OJ 2006 L 396, p. 1). |

**Operative part**

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Costs are reserved. |
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.42

This Note has not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended
(the "Act"), and is not a "restricted security," as that term is defined in Rule
144 under the Act. This Note may not be offered for sale, sold, or otherwise
transferred except pursuant to an effective Registration Statement under the
Act, or pursuant to an exemption from registration under the Act, the
availability of which is to be established to the satisfaction of the Borrower.

                         SUBORDINATED PROMISSORY NOTE

$155,000                                          Date: December 1, 1999
                                                  Due:  December 29, 2000

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Nutrition For Life International, Inc., a Texas corporation
("NFLI") hereby promises to pay to the order of Neil Sirkin ("Sirkin") at 3600
25/th/ Avenue, Gulfport, Mississippi 39501 or such other place of payment as
Sirkin may specify from time to time in writing, in lawful money of the United
States of America, the principal amount of One Hundred Fifty Five Thousand and
00/100 Dollars ($155,000) together with interest at seven percent (7%) per annum
from the date of this Subordinated Promissory Note (the "Note"), such principal
and interest to be paid the earlier to occur of (i) the refinancing of the
Gulfport, Mississippi property loan in the principal amount of not less than
$2,500,000 by BankOne, Texas NA or another financial institution or (ii)
December 29, 2000.

Payments shall be applied first to accrued interest and then to unpaid
principal.  Interest shall be computed on the basis of a year consisting of
twelve months of thirty days each.  Prepayment may be made without penalty or
premium.

ALL INDEBTEDNESS EVIDENCED BY THIS NOTE IS SUBORDINATED TO OTHER INDEBTEDNESS
PURSUANT TO, AND TO THE EXTENT PROVIDED IN, AND IS OTHERWISE SUBJECT TO THE
TERMS OF, THE INTERCREDITOR AND SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT, DATED NOVEMBER 30, 1999
(THE "SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT"), AS THE SAME MAY BE AMENDED, MODIFIED OR
OTHERWISE SUPPLEMENTED FROM TIME TO TIME, BY AND AMONG NUTRITION FOR LIFE
INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND CERTAIN OF ITS SUBSIDIARIES, AS BORROWERS, GENERAL
ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORPORATION, AS SENIOR LENDER, AND THE HOLDERS FROM TIME TO
TIME OF THE OBLIGATIONS ARISING UNDER THE SUBORDINATED DOCUMENTS REFERRED TO IN
THE SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, THIS NOTE.

NFLI waives presentment and demand for payment, notice of dishonor, protest and
notice and protest and any other notice as permitted under the UCC or any
applicable law.

                                NUTRITION FOR LIFE INTERNATIONAL, INC.

                                9101 Jameel
                                Houston, Texas 77040

                                Signature:  ____________________________________
                                Print Name: ____________________________________
                                Title:      ____________________________________
### §631c. Small Business Manufacturing Task Force

#### (a) Establishment

The Administrator of the Small Business Administration (referred to in this subtitle 1 as the "Administrator") shall establish a Small Business Manufacturing Task Force (referred to in this section as the "Task Force") to address the concerns of small manufacturers.

#### (b) Chair

The Administrator shall assign a member of the Task Force to serve as chair of the Task Force.

#### (c) Duties

The Task Force shall—

(1) evaluate and identify whether programs and services are sufficient to serve the needs of small manufacturers;

(2) actively promote the programs and services of the Small Business Administration that serve small manufacturers; and

(3) identify and study the unique conditions facing small manufacturers and develop and propose policy initiatives to support and assist small manufacturers.

#### (d) Meetings

#### (1) Frequency

The Task Force shall meet not less than 4 times per year, and more frequently if necessary to perform its duties.

#### (2) Quorum

A majority of the members of the Task Force shall constitute a quorum to approve recommendations or reports.

#### (e) Personnel matters

#### (1) Compensation of members

Each member of the Task Force shall serve without compensation in addition to that received for services rendered as an officer or employee of the United States.

#### (2) Detail of SBA employees

Any employee of the Small Business Administration may be detailed to the Task Force without reimbursement, and such detail shall be without interruption or loss of civil service status or privilege.

#### (f) Report

Not later than 1 year after December 8, 2004, and annually thereafter, the Task Force shall submit a report containing the findings and recommendations of the task force to—

(1) the President;

(2) the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate; and

(3) the Committee on Small Business of the House of Representatives.

(Pub. L. 108–447, div. K, title I, §147, Dec. 8, 2004, 118 Stat. 3455.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subtitle, referred to in subsec. (a), is subtitle D (§§141–147) of title I of div. K of Pub. L. 108–447, Dec. 8, 2004, 118 Stat. 3453, which enacted this section, amended sections 637, 648, 657b, and 657c of this title, enacted provisions set out as note under section 637 of this title, and amended provisions set out as a note under section 657b of this title. For complete classification of subtitle D to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Small Business Reauthorization and Manufacturing Assistance Act of 2004, and also as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005, and not as part of the Small Business Act which comprises this chapter.

1 See References in Text note below.