alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Customer Information: FISC Red Hill Pearl Harbor, H I Project Manager: Mr. Christopher Caputi Mass Technology Site Supervisor Jimmy Wolford Scope of Work: Furnish all required management, labor, services, materials and equipment to perfor m precision tightness testing of Tank # 9 an underground fuel storage tank located at FISC Red Hill, Pearl Harbor, HI. Report compiled by: Date: 0 3 - 2 0 - 200 8 Larry D. Speaks I declare under penalty of perjury that I am a licensed tank tester in the State of California and that the information contained in this report is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Test performed by: Date: 0 3 - 2 0 - 200 8 Jimmy Wolford License number: 90 - 1286
Mass Technology Corporation P. O. Box 1578 Kilgore, Texas 75662 Phone (903) 986
- 3564 Fax (903) 984
- 3569 

# Precision Leak Measurement

Report1 

# Table of Contents

 Table of Contents ................................ ................................ ......... 1

 Executive Summary ................................ ................................ ......... 1

 Resul ts of Testing

– Tank 9 ................................ .............................. 2

 Chart of data

– Tank 9 ................................ ................................ ...... 2



# Executive Summary
Testing of the 12,600 ,000 gal underground storage tank located at FISC Red Hill , Pearl Harbor, Hawaii commenced February 2 7 , 2008 and was completed March 11 , 2008 . The tank was filled with JP - 5 and a precision leak test was conducted. The result of that test indicates the tank is tight . Testing was performed using Mass Technology Corporation protocols set out in the third party evaluations. A ll tank valves were adequately secur ed such that any fluid loss was isolated to leakage. Therefore, the containment integrity of the tank was not compromised and the test is considered conclusive.

Tank 9 : After 240 hours of testing the tank is certified tight .2

Tank Data Tank 9 Diamet er: 100 ft. Height : 250 ft. Tank Type: Vertical Underground Contents: JP - 5 Properties: 0. 8 2 Specific Gravity Product Level: 21 0 ft. Test Data Start Date: 0 2 - 2 7 - 200 8 Completion Date: 0 3 - 11 - 200 8 Unit Operator: Jimmy Wolford Test Results Certified Ti ght Summary of Results The fluid mass data was recorded over a 240 - hour test period. A linear regression of the recorded fluid mass data resulted in no leak detected above the minimum detection level of 0.5 gallon s per hour. All tank valves were adequate ly secured such that any fluid loss was isolated to leakage. Therefore, the containment integrity of the tank has not been compromised and the tank is considered not to be leaking.
### §§221, 222. Repealed. July 21, 1950, ch. 484, §13, 64 Stat. 370

Sections, act July 12, 1894, ch. 131, §§1, 2, 28 Stat. 101, 102, related to units of electrical measure.
# C_2010113EN.01005701.xml

| 1.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/57

---

Action brought on 16 February 2010 — Bell & Ross v OHIM — Klockgrossisten i Norden (Representation of a watch)

(Case T-80/10)

2010/C 113/88

Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Bell & Ross BV (Zoetermeer, Netherlands) (represented by: S. Guerlain, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party/parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Klockgrossisten i Norden (Väsby, Sweden)

Other party/parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of 9 September 2009 in Case R 1285/2008-3 notified on 16 December 2009 to the representatives of the company BELL & ROSS BV on grounds of:






  — | infringement of Article 91 of Council Regulation No 6/2002 on Community designs; |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of 9 September 2009 in Case R 1285/2008-3 notified on 16 December 2009 to the representatives of the company BELL & ROSS BV on grounds of:

—

infringement of Article 91 of Council Regulation No 6/2002 on Community designs;

| — | infringement of Articles 57 and 63 of Council Regulation No 6/2002 on Community designs and Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights; |
| --- | --- |

—

infringement of Articles 57 and 63 of Council Regulation No 6/2002 on Community designs and Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights;

| — | infringement of Article 6 of Council Regulation No 6/2002 on Community designs. |
| --- | --- |

—

infringement of Article 6 of Council Regulation No 6/2002 on Community designs.

| — | Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community design in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: No 342 951 (watches)

Registered Community design in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought:

Proprietor of the Community design: the applicant

Proprietor of the Community design:

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity: Klockgrossisten i Norden

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Community design declared invalid

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: infringement of Articles 6, 57, 63 and 91 of Council Regulation No (EC) 6/2002 of 12 December 2001 on Community designs.

Pleas in law:

---
#### § 35.45 Applicability.

This subpart establishes credit practices for organized wholesale electric markets for the purpose of minimizing risk to market participants.
# C_2015221EN.01000602.xml

| 6.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/6

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 May 2015 — Timab Industries and CFPR v Commission

(Case T-456/10) (1)

1

((Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - European market for animal feed phosphates - Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU - Allocation of sales quotas, coordination of prices and conditions of sale and exchange of commercially sensitive information - Applicant’s withdrawal from the settlement procedure - Fines - Obligation to state reasons - Gravity and duration of the infringement - Cooperation - Failure to apply the likely range of fines indicated during the settlement procedure))

(2015/C 221/08)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Timab Industries (Dinard, France); and Cie financière et de participations Roullier (CFPR) (Saint-Malo, France) (represented by: N. Lenoir and M. Truffier, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Giolito, B. Mongin and F. Ronkes Agerbeek, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2010) 5001 final of 20 July 2010 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 [TFEU] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38866 — Animal feed phosphates), and, in the alternative, for reduction of the fine imposed on the applicants in that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action;

| 2) | Orders Timab Industries and Cie financière et de participations Roullier (CFPR) to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders Timab Industries and Cie financière et de participations Roullier (CFPR) to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 346, 18.12.2010.

1

---
### **CHAPTER 10—WAR FINANCE CORPORATION**
SERVED: MARCH 30, 2015 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

IXL PREMIUM LUBRICANTS, INC. 

DOCKET NO. FAA-2015-0634 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2014NM720059) has been assigned 

to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other 

communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing 

Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service List. 

/~ 

/ 

onnie . 2 o_sle ""~· ~ 

Chief Administrative Law Judge / , . ...,.....~ ,/ ..-' (_ _...... .... ,......,,_.. ..... .-· __.. 

- Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST -BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

ONE COPY 

Jordan Olsen, Head of Operations 

IXL Premium Lubricants, Inc., Respondent 

2719 North 1600 West 

Pleasant View, UT 84404 

TEL: 801-732-8885 

Jeffrey M. Harper, Complainant's Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Northwest Mountain Region (ANM-7) 

1601 Lind Avenue Southwest 

Renton, W A 98057 

TEL: 425-227-2161 

FAX:425-227-1007 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. FAA-2015-0634 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

2
.. 

In The Matter Of: 

NA YELL! FIGUEROA 

Respondent 

SERVED: January 27, 2016 

U.S •. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION . , 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

' ' l 

- ~ ' .~ l 

-. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Docket No. FAA-2015-2443 

Case No. 2014S0190129 

ERRATA ORDER 

On January 21, 2016, an Order Setting Litigation Dates and Procedures was filed, which 

contained incorrect dates. 

Therefore, pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.205(a)(6), and after reviewing all relevant caselaw, 

regulations, statutory authority, and being fully advised; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

1. The following corrections are made to the January 21, 2016 Order Setting Litigation 

Dates and Procedures: 

Page 

3 

3 

Line 

35 

37 

Attachment: Service List 

ReadsJanuary 18, 2016 

January 18, 2016 

Should ReadJanuary 18,2017 

January 18, 2017 
.. • Docket No. FAA-2015-2443 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST-BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

Mr. RyanM. Landers 

Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel, AS0-7 

Southern Region 

1701 Columbia A venue 

College Park, GA 30337 

TEL: 404-305-5200 

FAX: 404-305-5223 

Mr. Scott B. Bennett 

Respondent's Counsel 

The Bennett Law Center 

3377 SW 3rd Avenue 

Miami, FL 33145 

TEL: 305-648-2255 

FAX: 305-648-2256 

Judge J.E. Sullivan 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-6941 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

ONE COPY 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC--430.
# C_2015056EN.01001601.xml

| 16.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 56/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 56/16

---

Order of the General Court of 10 December 2014 — Productos Derivados del Acero v Commission

(Case T-388/10) (1)

1

((Action for annulment - Representation of the parties - No need to adjudicate))

(2015/C 056/21)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Productos Derivados del Acero, SA (Catarroja, Spain) (represented initially by M. Escuder Tella, F. Palau-Ramírez and J. Viciano Pastor, lawyers, subsequently by M. Escuder Tella and J. Viciano Pastor, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre, F. Castilla Contreras and V. Bottka, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C (2010) 4387 final of 30 June 2010 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38344 — Prestressing steel), amended by Commission Decision C (2010) 6676 final of 30 September 2010 and Commission Decision C (2011) 2269 final of 4 April 2011.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | Productos Derivados del Acero, SA shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Productos Derivados del Acero, SA shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 301, 6.11.2010.

1

---
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 21, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-50063 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus FRANCISCO GALLEGOS-MEDINA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-03-CR-55-1-AML

-------------------- Before JOLLY, JONES, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Francisco Gallegos-Medina concedes that the arguments raised are foreclosed by circuit precedent but seeks to preserve them for further review. The Government has moved for summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. The motion is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                           BD
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from SEC Form
10-K and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                 JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                         6,674,095
<RECEIVABLES>                                  9,299,226
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                    0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                  0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                           14,314,130
<PP&E>                                         1,116,427
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                36,361,522
<SHORT-TERM>                                           0
<PAYABLES>                                     9,737,293
<REPOS-SOLD>                                           0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                    0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                             3,210,864
<LONG-TERM>                                    2,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                          65,078
<OTHER-SE>                                             0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  36,361,522
<TRADING-REVENUE>                             57,690,503
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                             538,496
<COMMISSIONS>                                  1,992,818
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                  1,621,399
<FEE-REVENUE>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<COMPENSATION>                                27,181,296
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                4,946,079
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     4,946,079
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3,043,622
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.46



</TABLE>
§ 367.1010 Account 101, Service company property. ( a ) This account must include the cost of service company property, included in accounts 301 (§ 367.3010), 303 (§ 367.3030) and 389 to 399.1 (§§ 376.3890 to 367.3991), owned and used by the service company in its operations, and having an expectation of life in service of more than one year from date of installation.
( b ) The cost of additions to, and betterments of, property leased from others, that are includible in this account, must be recorded in subaccounts separate and distinct from those relating to owned property. (See Service Company Property Instruction in § 367.54.)
Filed by Bowne Pure Compliance





Exhibit 4.11.4




JOINDER AGREEMENT 




This Joinder Agreement (“Joinder Agreement”) is executed by Charles Hallinan (“Joinder Party”)
as of this 20th day of September 2007.



Background




Pure Earth, Inc. (“PEI) and Dynamic Decisions Strategic Opportunities, a Cayman Islands
corporation (“Seller”) are parties to a certain Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of August 17,
2007 (the “Stock Purchase Agreement”). Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined,
shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Stock Purchase Agreement. The Stock Purchase
Agreement contemplates that by execution of a Joinder Agreement, Joinder Party may become a party
to the Stock Purchase Agreement as a “Buyer ” thereunder to the extent of such Buyer’s Committed
Amount.



NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the undersigned, WITH THE INTENT TO BE
LEGALLY BOUND HEREBY, agrees as follows:



1. The undersigned Joinder Party hereby agrees to become a party to the Stock Purchase
Agreement, and agrees to be bound by and comply with all of the terms and conditions of, and be
entitled to all of the rights and benefits arising from, the Stock Purchase Agreement relating to
“Buyers” (as such term is defined in the Stock Purchase Agreement).



2. The undersigned Joinder Party hereby acknowledges receipt of a copy of the Stock Purchase
Agreement, and that Joinder Party has read and understands the Stock Purchase Agreement.



3. The undersigned Joinder Party hereby acknowledges and agrees that an executed copy of this
Joinder Agreement shall be attached to the Stock Purchase Agreement to evidence the undersigned’s
undertakings hereunder, and that an executed copy of this Joinder Agreement shall be given to each
person who is a party to the Stock Purchase Agreement as well as to the Escrow Agent.



4. The undersigned Joinder Party hereby agrees that its Committed Amount is $81,549.88,
(34,925) shares of the PEI Stock.



5. The name, address, telephone number and contact person of Joinder Party’s broker that will
coordinate the Delivery versus Payment transaction for Joinder Party’s Committed Amount is as
follows:



Oppenheimer & Co Inc.

125 Broad Street

New York, NY 10004

Attn:          Laurence Rubinstein          

Tel: 609-734-0400

Fax: 609-734-0453

Francis.ciabattoni@morganstanley.com




6. This Joinder Agreement shall be governed by, construed and enforced in accordance with the
laws of the State of Delaware, without giving effect to principles of conflicts of laws.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned Joinder Party has executed this Joinder Agreement as of
the date first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	JOINDER PARTY	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:
	/s/ Charles Hallinan	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Charles Hallinan	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	PURE EARTH, INC.
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Addrress

	 	3 Bala Plaza East, Suite 117
	 	 	 	By:
	 	/s/Mark Alsentzer
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Mark Alsentzer, Chief Executive Officer
	 

	 	Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004
Exhibit 5.1

                      WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI                              PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

                                 650 PAGE MILL ROAD                       PALO ALTO, CALIFORNIA 94304-1050                     TELEPHONE 650-493-9300 FACSIMILE 650-493-6811
May 10, 2001

 

 
Solectron Corporation777 Gibraltar DriveMilpitas, California  95035
    RE:  Registration Statement on Form S-8

Ladies and Gentlemen:

	We have examined the Registration Statement on Form S-8 to be filed byyou with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about May 10, 2001(the "Registration Statement") in connection with the registration under theSecurities Act of 1933, as amended, the offer and sale of 769,989 shares of your Common Stock,par value $0.001 per share, under the Centennial Technologies, Inc. ("Centennial")1999 Stock Incentive Plan, Centennial 1994 Stock Option Plan and Centennial 1994 Formula StockOption Plan.  Such shares of your Common Stock are referred to herein as the"Shares" and such plans and compensation agreements are referred toherein as the "Plans".    Solectron Corporation assumed these Plans in connectionwith its acquisition of Centennial on April 30, 2001.  As your counsel inconnection with the foregoing transaction, we have examined the proceedings taken and arefamiliar with the proceedings taken and are familiar with the proceedings proposed to be takenby you in connection with the issuance and sale of the Shares pursuant to the Plans.

	It is our opinion that, when issued and sold in the manner described inthe Plans and pursuant to the agreements which accompany each grant under thePlans, the Shares will be legally and validly issued, fully paid and non-assessableShares of your Common Stock.

	We consent to the use of this opinion as an exhibit to the RegistrationStatement, and further consent to the use of our name wherever appearing in theRegistration Statement and any amendments thereto.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati

WILSON, SONSINI, GOODRICH & ROSATI                   Professional Corporation
§ 1318.405 Agency decision. ( a ) TVA shall not make a decision regarding a proposed action for which an EIS has been issued until 30 days after a notice of availability of the FEIS has been published in the Federal Register or 90 days after a notice of availability of the DEIS has been published in the Federal Register, whichever is later.
( b ) After release of the FEIS and after TVA makes a decision about the proposed action, a ROD must be prepared by the NEPA compliance staff, in consultation with TVA legal counsel and the initiating TVA entity (see 40 CFR 1505.2). The ROD will normally include the items in the following paragraphs (b)(1) through (6): ( 1 ) The decision;
( 2 ) The basis for the decision and preferences among alternatives;
( 3 ) The alternative(s) considered to be environmentally preferable;
( 4 ) A summary of important environmental impacts;
( 5 ) The monitoring, reporting, and administrative arrangements that have been made; and
( 6 ) The measures that would mitigate or minimize adverse environmental impacts to which TVA commits to implement (see 40 CFR 1505.2(c)).
( c ) A ROD will be made available to the public.
( d ) Until a ROD is made available to the public, no action should be taken to implement an alternative that would have adverse environmental impacts or limit the choice of reasonable alternatives.