alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 145.10 Terminology and classification; flocks, products, and States. Participating flocks, products produced from them, and States that have met the requirements of a classification in this part may be designated by the corresponding illustrative design in this section. ( a ) [Reserved]
( b ) *U.S. Pullorum-Typhoid Clean.* (See § 145.23(b), § 145.33(b), § 145.43(b), §§ 145.53(b), 145.63(a), 145.73(b), 145.83(b), and 145.93(b).)
( c ) *U.S. M. Gallisepticum Clean.* (See §§ 145.23(c), 145.23(f), 145.33(c), 145.33(f), 145.43(c), 145.53(c), 145.73(c), and 145.83(c).)
( d ) *U.S. Sanitation Monitored.* (See § 145.33(d).)
( e ) *U.S. M. Synoviae Clean.* (See § 145.23(e), § 145.23(g), § 145.33(e), § 145.33(g), § 145.43(e), and § 145.53(d)).
( f ) *U.S. M. Meleagridis Clean* —(See § 145.43(d)).
( g ) *U.S. Pullorum-Typhoid Clean State.* (See §§ 145.24(a), 145.34(a), 145.44(a), 145.54(a), and 145.94(a).)
( h ) *U.S. Pullorum-Typhoid Clean State, Turkeys.* (See § 145.44(b).)
( i ) *U.S.M. Gallisepticum Clean State, Turkeys.* (See § 145.44(c).)
( j ) *U.S. M. Gallisepticum Clean State, Meat-Type Chickens.* (See § 145.34(b).)
( k ) *U.S. Sanitation Monitored, Turkeys.* (See § 145.43(f).) Figure 12
( l ) [Reserved]
( m ) *U.S. S. Enteritidis Clean.* (See §§ 145.23(d), 145.73(d), and 145.83(e).)
( n ) *U.S. M. Synoviae Clean State, Turkeys.* (See § 145.44(d).)
( o ) *U.S. Salmonella Monitored.* (See §§ 145.53(f), 145.73(g), 145.83(f), and 145.93(d).)
( p ) *U.S. M. Gallisepticum Monitored.* (See § 145.33(j).)
( q ) *U.S. M. Synoviae Monitored.* (See § 145.33(k).)
( r ) *U.S. Avian Influenza Clean.* (See §§ 145.23(h), 145.33(l), 145.63(b), 145.73(f), and 145.83(g).)
( s ) *U.S. M. Meleagridis Clean State, Turkeys.* (See § 145.44(e).)
( t ) *U.S. H5/H7 Avian Influenza Clean.* (See §§ 145.43(g), 145.53(e), and 145.93(c).)
[38 FR 13706, May 24, 1973. Redesignated at 44 FR 61586, Oct. 26, 1979] Editorial Note
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations affecting § 145.10, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*
### §544. Aids to maritime navigation; penalty

The Secretary shall prescribe and enforce necessary and reasonable rules and regulations, for the protection of maritime navigation, relative to the establishment, maintenance, and operation of lights and other signals on fixed and floating structures in or over waters subject to the jurisdiction of the United States and in the high seas for structures owned or operated by persons subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. Any owner or operator of such a structure, excluding an agency of the United States, who violates any of the rules or regulations prescribed hereunder, commits a misdemeanor and shall be punished, upon conviction thereof, by a fine of not exceeding $1,500 for each day which such violation continues.

(Aug. 4, 1949, ch. 393, 63 Stat. 501, §85; June 4, 1956, ch. 351, §1, 70 Stat. 226; Pub. L. 93–283, §1(2), May 14, 1974, 88 Stat. 139; Pub. L. 113–281, title II, §205(a)(3), Dec. 18, 2014, 128 Stat. 3025; renumbered §544, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §105(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4200.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 33, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §760 (May 14, 1908, ch. 168, §5, 35 Stat. 162).

Changes were made in phraseology. 81st Congress, House Report No. 557.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 544 was renumbered section 2906 of this title.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 85 of this title as this section.

2014—Pub. L. 113–281 substituted "$1,500" for "$100".

1974—Pub. L. 93–283 struck out "on fixed structures" after "maritime navigation" in section catchline and in text substituted "fixed and floating structures in or over waters subject to the jurisdiction of the United States and in the high seas for structures owned or operated by persons subject to the jurisdiction of the United States" for "fixed structures in or over navigable waters of the United States".

1956—Act June 4, 1956, amended section generally, vesting in Secretary rule-making authority, for the protection of maritime navigation, relative to the establishment, maintenance, and operation of lights and other signals on fixed structures in or over navigable waters of the United States, and excluding agencies of United States from its provisions.
### §5205. National Science Foundation

The National Science Foundation shall promote fundamental research in pursuance of the goals of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 100–697, §6, Nov. 19, 1988, 102 Stat. 4615.)
UNITED STATES SECURITIES
                           AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                           Washington, D.C. 20549

                                 FORM 12b-25
                         NOTIFICATION OF LATE FILING

  X  Form 10Q
-----

For Period Ended: March 31, 1999

PART I - REGISTRANT INFORMATION

Master Realty Properties, Inc.
-------------------------------------
Full Name of Registrant:

Master Mortgage Investment Fund, Inc.
-------------------------------------
Former Name If Applicable:

410 W. 8th Street
-------------------------------------
Address of Principal Executive Office (street and number)

Kansas City, Missouri  64105
-------------------------------------
City, State and Zip Code

PART II - RULES 12b-25(b) AND (c)

If the subject report could not be filed without unreasonable effort or
Expense and the registrant seeks relief pursuant to Rule 12b-25(b), the
Following should be completed. (Check box if appropriate)

  X
-----
    (a)The reasons described in reasonable detail in Part III of this
     form could not be eliminated without unreasonable effort or expense;

    (b)The subject annual report, semi-annual report, transition report
     on Form 10-K, Form 20-F, 11-K or Form N-SAR, or portion thereof,
     will be filed on or before the fifteenth calendar day following the
     prescribed due date; or the subject quarterly report of transition
     report on Form 10-Q, or portion thereof will be filed on or before
     the fifth calendar day following the prescribed due date; and

    (c)The accountant's statement or other exhibit required by Rule 12b-
       25c has been attached if applicable.




PART III - NARRATIVE

State below in reasonable detail the reasons why Form 10-Q could not be
Filed within the prescribed time period.

We request an extension of filing due to a pending financial transaction
which will be disclosed in the Form 10-Q Report.


PART IV - OTHER INFORMATION

1) Name and telephone number of person to contact in regard to this
notification

Thomas H. Trabon              (816)474-9333
----------------              --------------
Name                           Telephone

(2) Have all other periodic report required under Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or Section 30 of the Investment
Company Act of 1940 during the preceding 12 months or for such
Shorter period that the registrant was required to file such report(s)
Been filed? If answer is no, identify report(s).

X

---     ---

yes     no

(3) Is it anticipated that any significant change in results of operations
from the corresponding period for the last fiscal year will be reflected
by the earnings statements to be included in the subject report or portion
thereof?
         X
---     ---
yes      no

Master Realty Properties, Inc.
--------------------------------------------
(Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

has caused this notification to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned
hereunto duly authorized.

Date: May 14, 1999        By: /s/ Thomas H. Trabon,
__________________        __________________________
                                
                           Executive Vice President
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

May 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 133067 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 133067 COA: 274076 Kent CC: 05-008602-FC HEATHER CASSANDRA-OCTAVIA TRUE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 5, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

d0521 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 30, 2007

Clerk
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-10413 Summary Calendar

__________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RUY GARZA, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:94-CR-191-A

- - - - - - - - - - April 1, 1996 Before WIENER, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Ruy Garza appeals from his jury trial conviction and sentence for possession of cocaine with the intent to distribute and conspiracy to commit the same. The evidence was not insufficient. See United States v. Vasquez , 953 F.2d 176, 181 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 504 U.S. 946 (1992). The district court did not err by refusing to allow Garza's counsel to ask the venire panel questions regarding their beliefs in certainNo. 95-10413 -2- propositions of law. United States v. Rodriguez , 993 F.2d 1170, 1176 (5th Cir. 1993), cert. denied , 114 S.Ct. 1547 (1994). The district court did not err in denying Garza a mitigating-role adjustment under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2. See United States v. Zuniga , 18 F.3d 1254, 1261 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 115 S. Ct. 214 (1994). However, the district court exceeded its statutory power under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(d) in ordering Garza deported as a condition of supervised release. See United States v. Quaye , 57 F.3d 447, 450-51 (5th Cir. 1995). Therefore, we ORDER that the judgment below be amended as follows: As a condition of supervised release, upon completion of his term of imprisonment Garza is to be surrendered to a duly-authorized immigration official for deportation in accordance with the established procedures provided by the Immigration and Naturalization Act, 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101 et seq . As a further condition of supervised release, if ordered deported, Garza shall remain outside the United States.
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.
# C_2010195EN.01000303.xml

| 17.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 195/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 195/3

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Munich I (Germany) lodged on 21 April 2010 — Robert Nicolaus Abt, Daniela Kalwarowskyj, Mangusta Beteiligungs GmbH, Karsten Trippel, VC-Services GmbH, Henning Hahmann v Hypo Real Estate Holding AG

(Case C-194/10)

2010/C 195/06

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Landgericht Munich I

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Robert Nicolaus Abt, Daniela Kalwarowskyj, Mangusta Beteiligungs GmbH, Karsten Trippel, VC-Services GmbH, Henning Hahmann

Applicants:

Defendant: Hypo Real Estate Holding AG

Defendant:

Interveners: Klaus E.H. Zapf, Inge Jung-Arend

Interveners:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Is Article 5(1) of Directive 2007/36/EC (1) already to be applied, on account of the requirement under European law to refrain from measures liable to compromise a directive, where the national legislature has enacted a measure that will cease to have effect on the expiry of the transposition period but which, during that period, permits the period for convening a general meeting to be shortened to one day, where the general meeting passes a resolution (to increase the capital, subscriptions rights being excluded) that, on statutory grounds, remains valid after registration in the commercial register even if that resolution is annulled on the basis of a successful action for annulment? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is Article 5(1) of Directive 2007/36/EC (1) already to be applied, on account of the requirement under European law to refrain from measures liable to compromise a directive, where the national legislature has enacted a measure that will cease to have effect on the expiry of the transposition period but which, during that period, permits the period for convening a general meeting to be shortened to one day, where the general meeting passes a resolution (to increase the capital, subscriptions rights being excluded) that, on statutory grounds, remains valid after registration in the commercial register even if that resolution is annulled on the basis of a successful action for annulment?

1

| 2. | If that question is answered in the affirmative: may the infringement of Article 5(1) of Directive 2007/36/EC be justified by Community law requirements, in particular Article 297 EC? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If that question is answered in the affirmative: may the infringement of Article 5(1) of Directive 2007/36/EC be justified by Community law requirements, in particular Article 297 EC?

---

(1)  Directive 2007/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 on the exercise of certain rights of shareholders in listed companies; OJ 2007 L 184, p. 17.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meetings.

# SUMMARY:

The Dixie Resource Advisory Committee will meet in Cedar City, Utah. The committee is meeting as authorized under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act (Pub. L. 110-343) and in compliance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act. The purpose of this meeting is to make recommendations for Title II projects. The March 16, 2011 meeting has been cancelled.

# DATES:

Wednesday, March 30, 2011.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at Paiute Tribe of Utah Headquarters, 440 North Paiute Drive (200 East), Cedar City, Utah. The public is invited to attend the meetings.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Kenton Call, RAC Coordinator, Dixie National Forest, (435) 865-3730; e-mail:                         *ckcall@fs.fed.us.*

Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Standard Time, Monday through Friday.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting is open to the public. The following business will be conducted: (1) Welcome and committee introductions; (2) review of category voting from previous meeting; (3) discussion of RAC project recommendations; and (4) public comment on any proposals. Persons who wish to bring related matters to the attention of the Committee may file written statements with the Committee staff before or after the meeting. Public input will be accepted by the RAC during the meetings.

Dated: March 3, 2011.

Robert G. MacWhorter,

Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 2011-5297 Filed 3-8-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
### §3415. Cost reimbursement

Except for records obtained pursuant to section 3403(d) or 3413(a) through (h) of this title, or as otherwise provided by law, a Government authority shall pay to the financial institution assembling or providing financial records pertaining to a customer and in accordance with procedures established by this chapter a fee for reimbursement for such costs as are reasonably necessary and which have been directly incurred in searching for, reproducing, or transporting books, papers, records, or other data required or requested to be produced. The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System shall, by regulation, establish the rates and conditions under which such payment may be made.

(Pub. L. 95–630, title XI, §1115(a), Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3708.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 95–630, title XI, §1115(b), Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3708, provided that: "This section shall take effect on October 1, 1979."
### **CHAPTER 59—RETAIL POLICIES FOR NATURAL GAS UTILITIES**

Sec.
3201.
Purposes; coverage.
3202.
Definitions.
3203.
Adoption of certain standards.
3204.
Special rules for standards.
3205.
Federal participation.
3206.
Gas utility rate design proposals.
3207.
Judicial review and enforcement.
3208.
Relationship to other applicable law.
3209.
Reports respecting standards.
3210.
Prior and pending proceedings.
3211.
Relationship to other authority.
# C_2013063EN.01000502.xml

| 2.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 January 2013 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Woningstichting Maasdriel v Staatssecretaris van Financiën

(Case C-543/11) (1)

1

(Value-added tax - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 135(1)(k), read in conjunction with Article 12(1) and (3) - Land which has not been built on - Building land - Definitions - Demolition work for the purposes of future construction - Exemption from VAT)

2013/C 63/07

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Woningstichting Maasdriel

Applicant:

Defendant: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Interpretation of Article 135(1)(k), read in conjunction with Article 12(1) and (3), of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1) — Exemptions provided for by the Directive — Supply of land which has not been built on.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 135(1)(k) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, read in conjunction with Article 12(1) and (3) therein, must be interpreted as meaning that the exemption from value added tax provided for in Article 135(1)(k) does not cover the supply, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, of land which has not been built on following the demolition of the building situated on it, even where, at the time of that supply, improvement works on the land, apart from that demolition, had not been carried out, where it is apparent from an overall assessment of the factual circumstances surrounding that transaction and prevailing at the time of supply, including the intention of the parties when it is supported by objective evidence, that, at that time, the land at issue was in fact intended to be built on, a matter which is for the referring court to determine.

---

(1)  OJ C 25, 28.1.2012.

1

---
Exhibit










Amendment to the 
Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. 
Severance Plan for Senior Executives


Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. currently maintains the Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. Severance Plan for Senior Executives (the “Plan”).  Pursuant to the powers of amendment in Section 7.01 of the Plan, effective as of February 25, 2016, Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. hereby amends the Plan in the following manner:


Annex A of the Plan is amended and restated to read as follows:
Annex A
	
			
	Positions
	Severance Factor
	Severance Period

	Group President RAC International
	2.0
	24 months

	Chief Executive Officer, Senior Executive Vice President, Executive Vice President
	1.5
	18 months
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Recognizes Top National Lending Partners to Support 

Rural Homeownership

WASHINGTON, June 16, 2021 – The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) today hosted the 

2021 National Lender of the Year Awards Ceremony to recognize its top three national lending partners and 

their work to support rural homeownership in 2020. These three lenders helped 10,878 rural families and 

individuals buy homes nationwide last year through USDA Rural Development’s Single Family Housing 

Guaranteed Loan Program. 

The agency presented the awards virtually to:

• Fairway Independent Mortgage Corporation based in Wisconsin, which partnered with USDA to help

4,629 families and individuals buy homes last year;

• Movement Mortgage based in South Carolina, which partnered with USDA to help 3,548 families and 

individuals buy homes last year; and

• Caliber Home Loans Inc. based in Texas, which partnered with USDA to help 2,721 families and 

individuals buy homes last year.

USDA is a proud partner to all lenders who work with the agency to support rural homeownership. Over the last 

30 years, USDA has worked with nearly 4,000 private lenders nationwide to ensure the dream of 

homeownership is accessible to rural Americans across the country. These partnerships have helped nearly 2

million families and individuals finance homes in rural areas since the Single Family Housing Guaranteed Loan 

program was created in 1991.

If you’d like to subscribe to USDA Rural Development updates, visit our GovDelivery subscriber page. 

###

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
§ 592.180 Suspension of plant approval. ( a ) Any plant approval pursuant to the regulations in this part may be suspended for: ( 1 ) Failure to maintain plant and equipment in a satisfactory state of repairs;
( 2 ) The use of operating procedures that are not in accordance with the regulations in this part; or
( 3 ) Alterations of buildings, facilities, or equipment that cannot be approved in accordance with the regulations in this part.
( b ) During such period of suspension, inspection service shall not be rendered. However, the other provisions of the regulations in this part pertaining to providing service will remain in effect unless service is terminated in accordance with the terms thereof. If the plant facilities or methods of operation are not brought into compliance within a reasonable period of time to be specified by the Administrator, the application and service shall be terminated. Upon termination of service in an official plant pursuant to the regulations in this part, the plant approval shall also become terminated, and all labels, seals, tags, or packaging material bearing official identification shall, under the supervision of a person designated by the Administrator, either be destroyed, or if to be used at another location, modified in a manner acceptable to the Agency.