alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION
OF
 CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  In
connection with this Quarterly Report of Mega
Media Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period
ending July 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Aleksandr
Shvarts, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to
the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  1. Such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2008, fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2. The
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending July 31, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Mega Media Group,
Inc.
  By:
                /s/Aleksandr
      ShvartsALEKSANDR
      SHVARTSChief
      Executive Officer,
                  DirectorDate:
                September
      19, 2008
### §299. Definitions

(a) The expression "article of merchandise" as used in sections 294 to 300 of this title shall signify any goods, wares, works of art, commodity, or other thing which may be lawfully kept or offered for sale.

(b) The term "person" means an individual, partnership, corporation, or any other form of business enterprise, capable of being in violation of sections 294 to 300 of this title.

(c) The term "jewelry trade association" means an organization, consisting primarily of persons actively engaged in the jewelry or a related business, the purposes and activities of which are primarily directed to the improvement of business conditions in the jewelry or related businesses.

(June 13, 1906, ch. 3289, §6, 34 Stat. 262; Pub. L. 91–366, §1(c), (d), July 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 690.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1970—Pub. L. 91–366 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a) and added subsecs. (b) and (c).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1970 Amendments

Amendment by Pub. L. 91–366 effective three months after July 31, 1970, see section 4 of Pub. L. 91–366, set out as a note under section 297 of this title.

#### Separability

For separability provision of Pub. L. 91–366, see section 2 of Pub. L. 91–366, set out as a note under section 297 of this title.

#### Construction of 1970 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 91–366 to be held to be in addition to and not in substitution for or limitation of the provisions of any other Act of the United States, see section 3 of Pub. L. 91–366, set out as a note under section 297 of this title.
P.1 

OAR Box 1142 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

25) IV-F-23 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 4/23/2008 10:21:21 AM Sheet 25 of 30 
6. 

7. 

9. 

10. 

11. 

12. 

13. 

14. 

15. 

16. 

17. 

18. 

19. 

20. 

21. 

22. 

P.2 

W-F-23 

LIST OF TESTIFIERS 

07-22-93 

PUBLIC HEARING ON 

ONBOARD 

NAME REPRESENTING 

2. frctffttfp L.WUiVscU- AAM A 

3. K&u-J-W w fr*2ln<*Q F^/2-.b 

4. Sl-gpW Q*Sc\~ II M-S 

5. 

9%X //V/— <f/VST6* 

^Dwni ^ J^. Co^VA-yJ R R- I//A
# C_2010288EN.01005301.xml

| 23.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/53

---

Action brought on 26 August 2010 — Milux v OHMI (OVUMCONTROL)

(Case T-349/10)

()

(2010/C 288/98)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Milux Holding SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: J. Bojs, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 29 June 2010 in case R 1436/2009-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 29 June 2010 in case R 1436/2009-4;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘OVUMCONTROL’ for goods and services in classes 9, 10 and 44

Decision of the examiner: Refused the application for a Community trade mark

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal misapplied the principle of non-discrimination to the facts in this case; in the alternative, infringement of Articles 7(1)(b) and 7(1)(c) of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal erred in its conclusion that the trade mark applied for does not possess sufficient inherent distinctiveness.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Financial Statements of The Smithfield Companies, Inc. for
the year ended March 31, 2000, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such Consolidated Financial Statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       6,844,346
<SECURITIES>                                   575,840
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,227,744
<ALLOWANCES>                                    70,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,228,829
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,428,673
<PP&E>                                       9,494,855
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,977,784
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,102,155
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,325,596
<BONDS>                                      2,800,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,238,570
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,737,989
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,102,155
<SALES>                                     20,020,769
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            20,094,852
<CGS>                                       13,226,655
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               19,035,003
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             133,251
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,285,870
<INCOME-TAX>                                   377,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            908,870
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   908,870
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .40


</TABLE>
FORM RD 2006-46 (Rev. 01-98)

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE MANUAL ISSUE No.

RURAL DEVELOPMENT WSAL PN 578

Washington, D.C 20250 DATE

March 2, 2023 

PROCEDURE NOTICE

RD MANUAL CHANGES

INSERT RD INS 440.1 INTEREST RATES, AMORTIZATION, 

(WSAL) GUARANTEE FEE, ANNUAL CHARGE, AND 

FIXED PERIOD. This Instruction is 

partially revised as follows:

Exhibit B is partially revised to update the Treasury Judgement rate and the 

effective date of March 1, 2023. 

REMOVE INSERT

Exhibit B: Exhibit B: 

 Pages 1 & 2 dated 02-06-23 Pages 1 & 2 revised 03-02-23. 

RD HANDBOOK CHANGES

INSERT RD HB-1-3550 DIRECT SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING LOANS 

(WSAL) AND GRANTS FIELD OFFICE HANDBOOK. This 

Handbook is partially revised. The specific 

revisions are outlined below.

Appendix 4: 

Appendix 4 is revised to include the March 1, 2023, interest rate for the AboveModerate Single Family Housing non-program loans. 

REMOVE INSERT

Appendix 4 dated 03-02-22: Appendix 4 dated 03-02-22: 

 Pages 3 & 4 and 9. Pages 3 & 4 and 9 revised 03-02-23. 

INSERT RD HB-3-3560 

(WSAL)

REMOVE

Table of Contents: 

MFH PROJECT SERVICING HANDBOOK. The Table 

of Contents is partially revised to update 

formatting issues and page numbering. 

INSERT

Table of Contents: 

 Pages 5 thru 12. Pages 5 thru 12 revised 03-02-23. 

oOo

READ PROCEDURE - DISCUSS IN STAFF CONFERENCE - KEEP PROCEDURE MANUAL UP TO DATE
§ 301.5 Changes in Average System Cost methodology. ( a ) The Administrator, at his or her discretion, or upon written request from three-quarters of the utilities that are parties to contracts authorized by section 5(c) of the Northwest Power Act, or from three-quarters of Bonneville's preference customers, or from three-quarters of Bonneville's direct-service industrial customers may initiate a consultation process as provided in section 5(c) of the Northwest Power Act. After completion of this process, Bonneville's Administrator may file the new ASC methodology with the Commission.
( b ) The Administrator will not initiate any consultation process until one year of experience has been gained under the then-existing ASC methodology, that is, one year after the then-existing ASC methodology is adopted by Bonneville and approved by the Commission, through interim or final approval, whichever occurs first.
( c ) The Administrator may, from time to time, issue interpretations of the ASC methodology. The Administrator also may modify the functionalization code of any Account to comply with the limitations identified in sections 5(c)(7)(A)-(C) of the Northwest Power Act or to conform to Commission revisions to the Uniform System of Accounts.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Dana S. Philbrook, hereby certify that: 

 

(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Service Bancorp, Inc.; 

 

(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

(4) The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting; and 

 

(5) The small businessissuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal controls over financial reporting.
# C_2012080EN.01001702.xml

| 17.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 80/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 80/17

---

Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2012 — Goutier v OHIM — Euro Data (ARANTAX)

(Case T-387/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark ARANTAX - Earlier national word mark ANTAX - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Genuine use of the earlier mark - Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009)

2012/C 80/27

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Klaus Goutier (Frankfurt-am-Main, Germany) (represented by: E. Happe, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: B. Schmidt, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Euro Data GmbH & Co. KG, Datenverarbeitungsdienst (Saarbrucken, Germany) (represented by: D. Wagner, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 1 July 2010 (Case R 126/2009-4) concerning opposition proceedings between Euro Data GmbH & Co. KG, Datenverarbeitungsdienst and Mr Klaus Goutier.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Klaus Goutier to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Klaus Goutier to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 301, 6.11.2010.

1

---
Exhibit 32.2
 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ ROBERT GIAMBRONERobert GiambroneChief Financial Officer 
 *
    
    The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as
a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit






EXHIBIT 10.7


Summary Description of 
Named Executive Officer Compensation


As part of the Company’s general salary and wage reductions, on February 23, 2016, the Compensation Committee (the “Compensation Committee”) of the Board of Directors of TETRA Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”), at the request of Company management, approved reductions in the base annual salaries of certain officers of the Company, including certain of the officers who were identified as named executive officers in the Company’s 2015 proxy statement.  The salary reductions will commence on March 5, 2016 and continue through August 5, 2016, unless they are thereafter extended by the Compensation Committee. The effect of such salary reductions for the named executive officers is to reduce their respective annual base salaries by ten percent (10%) for the six-month period from February 6, 2016 (the first date that the Company’s general salary and wage reductions became effective) through August 5, 2016.  The following table sets forth the reduced effective base salaries for such six month period, unless such reduction is extended by the Compensation Committee.
	
					
	Named Executive Officer
	Title
	Previous Base Salary
	New Effective Base Salary
	Effective Reduction
(%)

	Stuart M. Brightman
	President and Chief Executive Officer
	$624,998
	$562,499
	10%

	Elijio V. Serrano
	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	$411,590
	$370,431
	10%

	Joseph Elkhoury
	Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
	$450,000
	$405,000
	10%

	Peter J. Pintar
	Senior Vice President
	$370,240
	$333,216
	10%






There have been no other changes in compensation for current officers who were identified as named executive officers in the Company's 2015 proxy statement.
TRIBAL LISTENING SESSION

USDA to Host Listening Sessions with Tribal Historic Preservation Offices on 

How to Improve Rural Development’s Environmental Review Process

WASHINGTON, July 16, 2021 – The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) today announced it is hosting 

listening sessions on Aug. 4 and Aug. 12, 2021, to solicit feedback from Tribal Historic Preservation Offices on 

ways to improve USDA Rural Development’s (RD) environmental review process.

USDA recognizes the unique circumstances that govern the environmental review process for projects on tribal 

lands. The Department encourages integral feedback from individuals who may participate in consultation for 

projects funded or authorized under Rural Development’s Rural Utilities Service, Rural Business-Cooperative 

Service and the Rural Housing Service. 

The Department is inviting feedback on environmental review policies and procedures in 7 CFR Part 1970, 

including compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act.

These listening sessions are part of a series designed to gather input from a broad range of Rural Development 

customers and perspectives. 

This first session will be held virtually on Wednesday, Aug. 4, 2021, at 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time. To register,

visit: https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/5475352818354044429. 

The second session will be held virtually on Thursday, Aug. 12, 2021 at 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time. To register, 

visit: https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/320851103433192205.

Registrants will receive an email with instructions to join online or by phone. For questions about the listening 

session, please email RD.Innovation@usda.gov. 

If you’d like to subscribe to USDA Rural Development updates, visit our GovDelivery subscriber page.

###

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender.
#### § 381.512 Purpose.

This subpart Z prescribes the conditions under which States that administer cooperative State poultry products inspection programs and establishments that operate under such programs may participate in a cooperative interstate shipment program.
# C_2011072EN.01001401.xml

| 5.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/14

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Finland) lodged on 23 December 2010 — Insinööritoimisto InsTiimi Oy

(Case C-615/10)

2011/C 72/23

Language of the case: Finnish

Referring court

Referring court

Korkein hallinto-oikeus

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Insinööritoimisto InsTiimi Oy

Appellant:

Other party: Puolustusvoimat

Other party:

Question referred

Question referred

Is Directive 2004/18/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts applicable, having regard to Article 10 of that directive and to Article 346(1)(b) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and to the list of arms, munitions and war material adopted by decision of the Council on 15 April 1958, to a procurement which otherwise falls within the scope of the directive, when according to the contracting entity the intended purpose of the object of procurement is specifically military, but there also exist largely identical technical applications of the object of procurement in the civilian market?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2004 L 134, p. 114.

1

---
#### § 93.208 Articles accompanying poultry.

No litter or manure, fodder or other aliment, nor any equipment such as boxes, buckets, ropes, chains, blankets, or other things used for or about poultry governed by the regulations this part, shall be landed from any conveyance except under such restrictions as the inspector in charge at the port of entry shall direct.
----

----

----

----

|                                                              | Periods ended 12/31/02 |       |        |  |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------|-------|--------|--|
||
| Small-Cap Value Fund                                         |                        |       |        |  |
| Returns before taxes                                         | -1.76%                 | 4.91% | 12.28% |  |
| Returns after taxes on distributions                         | -2.17                  | 3.45  | 10.56  |  |
| Returns after taxes on distributions and sale of fund shares | -0.95                  | 3.53  | 9.77   |  |
| Russell 2000 Index                                           | -20.48                 | -1.36 | 7.15   |  |
| Lipper Small-Cap Core Funds Index                            | -19.23                 | 1.39  | 8.70   |  |

----

| Shareholder fees (fees paid directly from your investment) |       |  |
|------------------------------------------------------------|-------|--|
||
||
| Management fee                                             | 0.67% |  |
| Other expenses                                             | 0.22% |  |
| Total annual fund operating expenses                       | 0.89% |  |

| 1 year | 3 years | 5 years | 10 years |
|-------------|--------------|--------------|---------------|
| $91         | $284         | $493         | $1,096        |

----

----

----
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. § 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Service Bancorp,
Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies that the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.





|                   |  |  |  | 
|------------------ |  |  |  | 
|                  
|Date: May 13, 2003 |  |  |  | 
|                   |  |  |  |
#### § 1306.5 Tenants' rights in improvements.

Tenants of real property being acquired by TVA will be paid just compensation for any improvements owned by them, whether or not they might have a right to remove such improvements under the terms of their tenancy. Such payment will be made only upon the condition that all right, title, and interest of the tenant in such improvements shall be transferred to TVA and upon the further condition that the owner of the real property being acquired shall execute a disclaimer of any interest in said improvements.

[38 FR 3592, Feb. 8, 1973. Redesignated at 52 FR 48019, Dec. 17, 1987]