alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5



<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                             MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         1,780
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  6,453
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               8,496
<PP&E>                                       473,738
<DEPRECIATION>                                36,141
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               454,937
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        131,456
<BONDS>                                      104,066
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                   37,500
<COMMON>                                         179
<OTHER-SE>                                   181,050
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 454,937
<SALES>                                       24,036
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              24,479
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 15,190
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3,746
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                5,543
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            5,543
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                   4,616
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    .28



</TABLE>
Exhibit




AMENDMENT TO
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made as of February 23, 2016 (the “Effective Date”), by and between Spirit Realty Capital, Inc. (the “Company”) and Phillip D. Joseph, Jr. (the “Employee”).  Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Employment Agreement (as defined below).


RECITALS


		
	A.
	The Company and the Employee have entered into an Employment Agreement dated March 25, 2015, as amended by that certain letter agreement dated October 14, 2015 (the “Employment Agreement”).




		
	B.
	The parties hereto wish to amend certain terms of the Employment Agreement.




AMENDMENT


The parties hereto hereby amend the Employment Agreement as follows.  


1.Section 3.  Effective January 1, 2016, the phrase “$400,000” in Section 3 is hereby deleted and replaced with the phrase “$415,000”.


2.Section 4(a).  The first sentence of Section 4(a) of the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety with the following:


“Beginning with calendar year 2016, during the Employment Term, the Employee shall be eligible to receive an annual discretionary incentive payment under the Company’s annual bonus plan as may be in effect from time to time (the “Annual Bonus”), based on a target bonus opportunity equal to 125% of the Employee’s Base Salary (the “Target Bonus”) and a maximum bonus opportunity of 200% of the Employee’s Base Salary, upon the attainment of one or more pre-established performance goals established by the Board (or a committee thereof) in its sole discretion.”


3.This Amendment shall be and, as of the Effective Date, is hereby incorporated in and forms a part of the Employment Agreement.


4.Except as expressly provided herein, all terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.  


(Signature page follows)













IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above.
SPIRIT REALTY CAPITAL, INC.




By:    /s/ Thomas H. Nolan, Jr.             
                    Thomas H. Nolan, Jr.    
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
                        


EMPLOYEE


/s/ Phillip D. Joseph, Jr.        
Phillip D. Joseph, Jr.
#### Hugo Schmidt, Respondent, v. Charles C. Collison, Appellant.

Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed on the ground that it is against the weight of evidence and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event. Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor and Rich, JJ.. concurred.
+

!

p

1120

1140

1100

1120

1100

1100

1110

1120

1110

1120

C O U N T Y H W Y-1 4 8

T O W N R O A D 1 2 1

¬«11

¬«11

¬«11

¬«11

UNI

CANADA

TED STATES

UNI

CANADA

TED STATES

Burton

Cre

e

k

Rainy River

Rainy River

Rainy River

Rainy River

Manitou

Birchdale

Manitou Loman Birchdale

SE

Manitou

OE N

Loman

OE N

57' 93°52'30"

30" 55'

55'

57'

94°00' 30"

94°

48°

00'

48°37'30" 37'30"

2 000

40'

42'

FEET

30"

40'

30"

2 410 000

430

FEET

42'

53

53

53

53

53

53

53

53

53

53

53

53

53

53

53

53

000m

53

53

53

53

53

53

53

4 4 000m

4

4 4 4 4

54

53

000m

4 4

000m 4 4 4 4

4

4 4 4 4 35

89

90

98

92

95

91

96

93

34

N

99

94

28 30 32

87

29 31 35

28

27 33

27 30 31 32 33 34

94

29

93

96

89

97

92

91

99

95

87

N

88

00

E

90

98

VQ

VQ

VP

VP

48°45' 48°45'

93°52'30"

1 110

FEET

FEET

1 140 000

E

000

54

00

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

MINNESOTA

ADJOINING 7.5' QUADRANGLES

QUADRANGLE LOCATION

MANITOU OE N, MN-ON

2011

Interstate Route State Route

ROAD CLASSIFICATION

Ramp 4WD

US Route Local Road

WX Interstate Route /. US Route H State Route

MANITOU OE N QUADRANGLE

MINNESOTA-ONTARIO

7.5-MINUTE SERIES

Imagery.....................................................NAIP, June 2010

Roads................................................©2006-2011 TomTom

Names...............................................................GNIS, 2011

Hydrography.................National Hydrography Dataset, 2010

Contours.............................National Elevation Dataset, 1999

Boundaries..............Census, IBWC, IBC, USGS, 1972 - 2010

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84). Projection and

1 000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator, Zone 15U

Produced by the United States Geological Survey

10 000-foot ticks: Minnesota Coordinate System of 1983

(north zone)

This map was produced to conform with the

National Geospatial Program US Topo Product Standard, 2011.

A metadata file associated with this product is draft version 0.6.1

CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET

NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988

SCALE 1:24 000

1 0.5 0

MILES

1

1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 10000

FEET

1000 500 0 METERS 1000 2000

1 0.5 0 KILOMETERS 1 2

U.S. National Grid

100,000-m Square ID

Grid Zone Designation

VQ

VP

54 00

15U

×

Ù

MN

GN

UTM GRID AND 2011 MAGNETIC NORTH DECLINATION AT CENTER OF SHEET

0° 42 ́ 13 MILS

0° 47 ́

14 MILS
# C_2010161EN.01005803.xml

| 19.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/58

---

Action brought on 28 April 2010 — AG (*1) v Parliament

(Case F-25/10)

(2010/C 161/95)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: AG (*1) (represented by: S. Rodriguez and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision to dismiss the applicant at the end of the probationary period and compensation for the loss suffered.

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the dismissal decision of 14 May 2009, together with the decision of 21 December 2009 rejecting the complaint; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the dismissal decision of 14 May 2009, together with the decision of 21 December 2009 rejecting the complaint;

| — | Indicate to the Appointing Authority the effects which the annulment of the contested decisions entail and, in particular, the possibility of a second probationary period or an extension of the probationary period, after which a new assessment of her performance would be carried out; |
| --- | --- |

—

Indicate to the Appointing Authority the effects which the annulment of the contested decisions entail and, in particular, the possibility of a second probationary period or an extension of the probationary period, after which a new assessment of her performance would be carried out;

| — | Order the European Parliament to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the European Parliament to pay the costs.

---

(*1)  Information erased or replaced within the framework of protection of data and/or confidentiality.

---
### §1337. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 89–92, §9, formerly §8, July 27, 1965, 79 Stat. 283; Pub. L. 91–222, §2, Apr. 1, 1970, 84 Stat. 89; renumbered §9 and amended Pub. L. 98–474, §§5(a), 6(d), Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2203, 2205, which required the Secretary of Health and Human Services to transmit an annual report to Congress concerning health consequences of smoking and recommendations for legislation, and which required the Federal Trade Commission to transmit an annual report to Congress concerning practices and methods of cigarette advertising and promotion and recommendations for legislation, terminated, effective May 15, 2000, pursuant to section 3003 of Pub. L. 104–66, as amended, set out as a note under section 1113 of Title 31, Money and Finance. See, also, pages 95 and 172 of House Document No. 103–7.

A prior section 9 of Pub. L. 89–92 was renumbered section 10 and is classified to section 1338 of this title.
(function (Drupal, $, once) {
  Drupal.behaviors.samhsaLegoViewsMultipurpose = {
    attach(context) {
      /**
       * We only run this code once on the initial page lood.
       * Note that this is the new way of doing this. As of Drupal 9.3, the jquery.once library has been removed from core. Backwards compatibility has been engineered in, but eventually it"ll be deprecated and removed, so from this point on, we should adopt the new way of doing this.
       * https://www.drupal.org/node/3158256
       *
       * Note not just the "once" first line of code below, but the "once" declarations at the start and end of this script.
       */

      // THIS FILE IS BEING LOADED GLOBALLY FROM THE samhsa_uswds_base.libraries.yml FILE.

      $(once("samhsaLegoViewsMultipurpose", "html", context).forEach((element) => {
        // START SINGLE RUN CODE

        /**
         * This block of JS performs error checking for the View Multipurpose component.
         * It throws two possible errors
         * 1. If the block is trying to use a non-existent View
         * 2. If the View exists but the block is not returning any content because of a misconfiguration.
         *
         * Besides the convenience of the error reporting, this also helps because if the resulting block is empty
         * it collapses in on itself in the UI and there's no way to get hold of it to edit or delete it.
         * The inline alerts throw here alleviates that problem.
         */
        $('.block-lego-views-multipurpose').each(function () {
          if ($(this).find('.block-content div').html().trim().length === 0) {
            const alert = '<div class="usa-alert usa-alert--error">\n' +
              '  <div class="usa-alert__body">\n' +
              '    <h4 class="usa-alert__heading">Error: No View available</h4>\n' +
              '    <p class="usa-alert__text">\n' +
              '      You have configured this block to use a View block that does not exist.' +
              '    </p>\n' +
              '  </div>\n' +
              '</div>';
            $(this).find('.block-content div').html(alert);
          } else {
            if ($(this).find('.views-element-container').html().length === 0) {
              const alert = '<div class="usa-alert usa-alert--error">\n' +
                '  <div class="usa-alert__body">\n' +
                '    <h4 class="usa-alert__heading">Error: Misconfiguration</h4>\n' +
                '    <p class="usa-alert__text">\n' +
                '      There is a configuration problem with either the view or this block. It\'s not returning any content.' +
                '    </p>\n' +
                '  </div>\n' +
                '</div>';
              $(this).find('.views-element-container').html(alert);
            }
          }
        });

        // END SINGLE RUN CODE
      }));

    }
  };
}(Drupal, jQuery, once));
# C_2006331EN.01004002.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/40

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 13 December 2006 — Heus v Commission

(Case T-173/05) (1)

1

(Officials - Access to an internal competition - Competition notice - Condition relating to length of service - Action for annulment - Principle of non-discrimination)

(2006/C 331/88)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Martine Heus (Anderlecht, Belgium) (represented by: L. Vogel, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: L. Lozano Palacios and K. Herrmann, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Principally, application for annulment of the decision not to admit the applicant to competition COM/PC/04.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders each of the parties to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders each of the parties to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 182, 23.7.2005.

1

---
§ 71.6 Carrier responsible for cleaning and disinfecting of railroad cars, trucks, boats, aircraft or other means of conveyance. ( a ) Railroad cars, trucks, boats, aircraft, and other means of conveyance which have been used in the interstate transportation of cattle, sheep, goats, swine, poultry, or other animals affected with, or carrying the infection of, any contagious, infectious, or communicable disease of livestock or poultry, other than slight unopened cases of actinomycosis or actinobacillosis (or both), atrophic rhinitis, bovine foot rot, brucellosis, ram epididymitis, ringworm, infectious keratitis, and arthritis (simple lesions only), shall be cleaned and disinfected under APHIS supervision in accordance with §§ 71.7 and 71.10 through 71.12 at the point where the animals are unloaded and the final carrier shall be responsible for such cleaning and disinfecting: *Provided,* That when APHIS supervision is not available at such point, the means of conveyance may be cleaned and disinfected under the supervision of a State representative or an accredited veterinarian.
( b ) No railroad car, truck, boat, aircraft or other means of conveyance from which poultry or other animals affected with an infectious, contagious or communicable disease of livestock or poultry, other than those specified in § 71.4(b), have been unloaded shall thereafter be used in connection with the interstate movement of animals, including poultry, or be moved interstate until it has been cleaned and disinfected by the final carrier under the supervision of an APHIS or State representative or an accredited veterinarian in accordance with §§ 71.7 and 71.10 through 71.12.
( c ) If APHIS supervision or other supervision as required by paragraph (a) or (b) of this section or proper cleaning and disinfecting facilities are not available at the point where the animals are unloaded, upon permission first received from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, the means of conveyance may be forwarded empty to a point at which such supervision and facilities are available, and there be cleaned and disinfected under supervision in accordance with §§ 71.7 and 71.10 through 71.12.
[34 FR 15641, Oct. 9, 1969, as amended at 37 FR 25337, Nov. 30, 1972; 39 FR 4465, Feb. 4, 1974; 55 FR 11156, Mar. 27, 1990; 55 FR 15320, Apr. 23, 1990; 62 FR 27934, May 22, 1997; 74 FR 14709, Apr. 1, 2009]
### §1666d. Treatment of credit balances

Whenever a credit balance in excess of $1 is created in connection with a consumer credit transaction through (1) transmittal of funds to a creditor in excess of the total balance due on an account, (2) rebates of unearned finance charges or insurance premiums, or (3) amounts otherwise owed to or held for the benefit of an obligor, the creditor shall—

(A) credit the amount of the credit balance to the consumer's account;

(B) refund any part of the amount of the remaining credit balance, upon request of the consumer; and

(C) make a good faith effort to refund to the consumer by cash, check, or money order any part of the amount of the credit balance remaining in the account for more than six months, except that no further action is required in any case in which the consumer's current location is not known by the creditor and cannot be traced through the consumer's last known address or telephone number.

(Pub. L. 90–321, title I, §165, as added Pub. L. 93–495, title III, §306, Oct. 28, 1974, 88 Stat. 1514; amended Pub. L. 96–221, title VI, §621(a), Mar. 31, 1980, 94 Stat. 184.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1980—Pub. L. 96–221 substituted provisions relating to duties of creditor whenever a credit balance in excess of $1 is created in connection with a consumer credit transaction, for provisions relating to duties of creditor whenever an obligor transmits funds to creditor in excess of the total balance due on an open end consumer credit account.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1980 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 96–221 effective on expiration of two years and six months after Mar. 31, 1980, with all regulations, forms, and clauses required to be prescribed to be promulgated at least one year prior to such effective date, and allowing any creditor to comply with any amendments, in accordance with the regulations, forms, and clauses prescribed by the Board prior to such effective date, see section 625 of Pub. L. 96–221, set out as a note under section 1602 of this title.
GRAY'S REET OCEAN SCIENCE COURSE

PLANET OCEAN
§ 71.4 Maintenance of certain facilities and premises in a sanitary condition required; cleaning and disinfection, when required; animals classed as “exposed.” ( a ) Yards, pens, chutes, alleys, and other facilities and premises which are used in connection with the interstate movement of livestock or poultry shall be maintained by the person in possession of the facilities and premises in a clean and sanitary condition, in accordance with good animal husbandry practices, and shall be subject to inspection by an APHIS or State representative. When an APHIS or State representative determines that such facilities or premises are not in such clean and sanitary condition and gives written notice of his determination to such person, the facilities and premises shall be cleaned and disinfected in accordance with §§ 71.7 and 71.10 through 71.12 by such person under the supervision of an APHIS or State representative or an accredited veterinarian before such premises are again used for livestock or poultry.
( b ) Yards, pens, chutes, alleys, and other facilities and premises which have contained interstate shipments of cattle, sheep, swine, poultry, or other animals affected with, or carrying the infection of, any contagious, infectious, or communicable disease of livestock or poultry other than slight unopened cases of actinomycosis or actinobacillosis (or both), bovine foot rot, atrophic rhinitis, ram epididymitis, ringworm, infectious keratitis, and arthritis (simple lesions only), shall be cleaned and disinfected under the supervision of an APHIS or State representative or an accredited veterinarian in accordance with §§ 71.7 and 71.10 through 71.12 before such premises are again used for animals, and any poultry or other animals unloaded into such yards or premises before they have been so cleaned and disinfected shall thereafter be classed as “exposed” within the meaning of the regulations in this subchapter and shall not be moved interstate except in compliance with the provisions of such regulations applicable to “exposed” animals.
[34 FR 15641, Oct. 9, 1969, as amended at 55 FR 11156, Mar. 27, 1990; 55 FR 15320, Apr. 23, 1990; 62 FR 27933, May 22, 1997]
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofInformation Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedJune 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 9,2004 (the “Report”), I, Vincent A. Chippari, Executive Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, tomy knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| August 9, 2004 | /s/ Vincent A. Chippari                                                              |   |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|           | Vincent A. Chippari                                                                  |
|           | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial  Officer  (Principal Financial Officer) |

 

 

A signed original statement of this written statement required bySection 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwiseadopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic versionof this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided toInformation Holdings Inc. and will be retained by Information Holdings Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Proteo, Inc., a Nevada
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Walter J.
Thomsen, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does hereby
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350), that to his knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



Date: August 12, 2005


/s/ Walter J. Thomsen
-----------------------------
Walter J. Thomsen
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHER
DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT
APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE ELECTRONIC VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO PROTEO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY AND
WILL BE RETAINED BY PROTEO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.




================================================================================
Page 17