alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1802. Definitions

As used in this chapter—

(1) The term "antitrust law" means the Federal Trade Commission Act [15 U.S.C. 41 et seq.] and each statute defined by section 4 thereof [15 U.S.C. 44] as "Antitrust Acts" and all amendments to such Act and such statutes and any other Acts in pari materia.

(2) The term "joint newspaper operating arrangement" means any contract, agreement, joint venture (whether or not incorporated), or other arrangement entered into by two or more newspaper owners for the publication of two or more newspaper publications, pursuant to which joint or common production facilities are established or operated and joint or unified action is taken or agreed to be taken with respect to any one or more of the following: printing; time, method, and field of publication; allocation of production facilities; distribution; advertising solicitation; circulation solicitation; business department; establishment of advertising rates; establishment of circulation rates and revenue distribution: Provided, That there is no merger, combination, or amalgamation of editorial or reportorial staffs, and that editorial policies be independently determined.

(3) The term "newspaper owner" means any person who owns or controls directly, or indirectly through separate or subsidiary corporations, one or more newspaper publications.

(4) The term "newspaper publication" means a publication produced on newsprint paper which is published in one or more issues weekly (including as one publication any daily newspaper and any Sunday newspaper published by the same owner in the same city, community, or metropolitan area), and in which a substantial portion of the content is devoted to the dissemination of news and editorial opinion.

(5) The term "failing newspaper" means a newspaper publication which, regardless of its ownership or affiliations, is in probable danger of financial failure.

(6) The term "person" means any individual, and any partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity existing under or authorized by the law of the United States, any State or possession of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any foreign country.

(Pub. L. 91–353, §3, July 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 466.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal Trade Commission Act, referred to in par. (1), is act Sept. 26, 1914, ch. 311, 38 Stat. 717, which is classified generally to subchapter I (§41 et seq.) of chapter 2 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 58 of this title and Tables.
#### Moses Reis v. Andrew J. Graham.

Motion denied.
### §278i. Reports to Congress

#### (a) Information to Congress on Institute activities

The Director shall keep the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives fully and currently informed with regard to all of the activities of the Institute.

#### (b) Justification for changes in policies and fees

The Director shall justify in writing all changes in policies regarding fees for standard reference materials and calibration services occurring after June 30, 1987, including a description of the anticipated impact of any proposed changes on demand for and anticipated revenues from the materials and services. Changes in policy and fees shall not be effective unless and until the Director has submitted the proposed schedule and justification to the Congress and 30 days on which both Houses of Congress are in session have elapsed since such submission, except that the requirement of this sentence shall not apply with respect to adjustments which are based solely on changes in the costs of raw materials or of producing and delivering standard reference materials or calibration services.

(Mar. 3, 1901, ch. 872, §23, as added Pub. L. 100–418, title V, §5114(2), Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1432; amended Pub. L. 110–69, title III, §3004, Aug. 9, 2007, 121 Stat. 590; Pub. L. 114–329, title II, §204(a)(1)(B)(i), Jan. 6, 2017, 130 Stat. 2998.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2017—Subsecs. (c), (d). Pub. L. 114–329 struck out subsecs. (c) and (d) which required the Director to submit to Congress a 3-year programmatic planning document for the Institute and annual updates.

2007—Subsecs. (c), (d). Pub. L. 110–69 added subsecs. (c) and (d).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of House of Representatives treated as referring to Committee on Science of House of Representatives by section 1(a) of Pub. L. 104–14, set out as a note preceding section 21 of Title 2, The Congress. Committee on Science of House of Representatives changed to Committee on Science and Technology of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 6, One Hundred Tenth Congress, Jan. 5, 2007. Committee on Science and Technology of House of Representatives changed to Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 5, One Hundred Twelfth Congress, Jan. 5, 2011.
### §713a–11. Annual appropriations to reimburse Commodity Credit Corporation for net realized loss

There is authorized to be appropriated annually for each fiscal year by means of a current, indefinite appropriation, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, an amount sufficient to reimburse Commodity Credit Corporation for its net realized loss incurred during such fiscal year, as reflected in its accounts and shown in its report of its financial condition as of the close of such fiscal year. Reimbursement of net realized loss shall be with appropriated funds, as provided herein, rather than through the cancellation of notes.

(Pub. L. 87–155, §2, Aug. 17, 1961, 75 Stat. 391; Pub. L. 100–203, title I, §1506(a), Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1330–28.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1987—Pub. L. 100–203 substituted "by means of a current, indefinite appropriation" for ", commencing with the fiscal year ending June 30, 1961".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1987 Amendment

Pub. L. 100–203, title I, §1506(c), Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1330–29, provided that: "This section and the amendment made by this section [amending this section and enacting provisions set out as a note below] shall apply beginning with fiscal year 1988."

#### Operating Expenses

Pub. L. 100–203, title I, §1506(b), Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1330–29, provided that: "No funds may be appropriated for operating expenses of the Commodity Credit Corporation except as authorized under section 2 of Public Law 87–155 [15 U.S.C. 713a–11] to reimburse the Corporation for net realized losses."
§ 1312.13 Custody of archaeological resources. ( a ) Archaeological resources excavated or removed from the public lands remain the property of the United States.
( b ) Archaeological resources excavated or removed from Indian lands remain the property of the Indian or Indian tribe having rights of ownership over such resources.
( c ) The Secretary of the Interior may promulgate regulations providing for the exchange of archaeological resources among suitable universities, museums, or other scientific or educational institutions, for the ultimate disposition of archaeological resources, and for standards by which archaeological resources shall be preserved and maintained, when such resources have been excavated or removed from public lands and Indian lands.
( d ) In the absence of regulations referenced in paragraph (c) of this section, the Federal land manager may provide for the exchange of archaeological resources among suitable universities, museums, or other scientific or educational institutions, when such resources have been excavated or removed from public lands under the authority of a permit issued by the Federal land manager.
( e ) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section, the Federal land manager will follow the procedures required by NAGPRA and its implementing regulations for determining the disposition of Native American human remains and other “cultural items”, as defined by NAGPRA, that have been excavated, removed, or discovered on public lands.
[49 FR 1028, Jan. 6, 1984, as amended at 60 FR 5259, 5261, Jan. 26, 1995]
# C_2012227EN.01002001.xml

| 28.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 227/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 227/20

---

Order of the General Court of 12 June 2012 — Vesteda Groep v Commission

(Case T-206/10) (1)

1

(State aid - Scheme of aid granted by the Netherlands to social housing corporations - Existing aid - Decision accepting the commitments made by the Member State - Action for annulment - Locus standi - Inadmissibility)

2012/C 227/31

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Vesteda Groep BV (Maastricht, Netherlands) (represented by: G. van der Wal and T. Boesman, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: H. van Vliet, S. Noë and S. Thomas, acting as Agents, assisted by H. Gilliams, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 9963 final of 15 December 2009 relating to State aid E 2/2005 and N 642/2009 — (Netherlands) — Existing and special project aid to housing corporations

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Vesteda Groep BV shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Vesteda Groep BV shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 179, 3.7.2010.

1

---
§ 385.1902 Appeals from action of staff (Rule 1902). ( a ) Any staff action (other than a decision or ruling of presiding officer, as defined in Rule 102(e)(1), made in a proceeding set for hearing under subpart E of this part) taken pursuant to authority delegated to the staff by the Commission is a final agency action that is subject to a request for rehearing under Rule 713 (request for rehearing).
( b ) All appeals of staff action that were timely filed prior to December 3, 1990 and that had not been acted upon by the Commission on their substantive merits are deemed to be timely filed requests for rehearing of final agency action. All notices issued by the Commission prior to December 3, 1990 stating the Commission's intent to act on appeals of staff action such that they are not deemed denied by the expiration of a 30-day period after the filing of the appeal, are deemed to be orders granting rehearing of final agency action for the sole purpose of further consideration, unless the Commission issued an order on the substantive merits of the appeal prior to December 3, 1990. No later than January 2, 1991, persons who had timely filed appeals of staff action prior to December 3, 1990 which were pending before the Commission on that date may file additional pleadings to update or supplement those appeals.
[Order 530, 55 FR 50682, Dec. 10, 1990, as amended by Order 606, 64 FR 44405, Aug. 16, 1999]
# Compassion Fatigue Wallet Card
Exhibit 99.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Service Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Dana S. Philbrook, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his best knowledge:





(1)    The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/S/    DANA S. PHILBROOKDana S. Philbrook Chief Financial Officer November 14, 2002
PUBLIC LAW 113–224—DEC. 16, 2014 128 STAT. 2111 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4939: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 160 (2014): 

Sept. 8, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 8, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 113–224 

113th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 2551 Galena 

Avenue in Simi Valley, California, as the ‘‘Neil Havens Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. NEIL HAVENS POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 2551 Galena Avenue in Simi Valley, California, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Neil Havens Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Neil Havens Post Office’’. 

Approved December 16, 2014. 

Dec. 16, 2014 

[H.R. 4939] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLAWS
# C_2012331EN.01001001.xml

| 27.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 September 2012 — United States Polo Association v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(Case C-327/11 P) (1)

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 8(1)(b) - Likelihood of confusion - Word mark ‘U.S. POLO ASSN.’ - Opposition by the holder of the earlier word mark ‘POLO-POLO’)

(2012/C 331/15)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: United States Polo Association (represented by: P. Goldenbaum, Rechtsanwältin)

Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, acting as Agent)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 13 April 2011 in Case T-228/09 United States Polo Association v OHIM dismissing an action for annulment brought by the applicant for the word mark ‘U.S. POLO ASSN.’ for goods in Classes 9, 20, 21, 24 and 27 against the decision R 886/2008-4 of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 20 March 2009 dismissing the appeal against the decision of the Opposition Division partly refusing registration of that mark in opposition proceedings brought by the proprietor of the Community and national word marks ‘POLO-POLO’ for goods in Classes 24, 35 and 39 — Interpretation and application of Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders United States Polo Association to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders United States Polo Association to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 311, 22.10.2011.

---
<PAGE>
                        CONSENT OF KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP
 
                                  EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                                       58
<PAGE>
                  ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT ON SCHEDULES AND CONSENT
 
The Board of Directors
Republic Engineered Steels, Inc.:
 
    The audits referred to in our report dated August 1, 1997, included the
related financial statement schedules as of June 30, 1997, and for each of the
years in the three-year period ended June 30, 1997, included herein. These
financial statement schedules are the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statement schedules based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial
statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated
financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly in all material respects
the information set forth therein.
 
    We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated August 1,
1997 included herein to registration statement No. 33-91814, relating to The
Republic Engineered Steels, Inc. Employee Common Stock Ownership Plan and to
registration statement No. 33-91816 relating to The Republic Engineered Steels,
Inc. 1995 Stock Option Plan.
 
<TABLE>
<S>                                            <C>
/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
--------------------------------------------
KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
Pittsburgh, PA
September 15, 1997
</TABLE>
 
                                       59
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

IRVING V. BROWN , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 1267

[ July 9, 2020 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800(a) motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Kirk C. Volker , Judge; L.T. Case No. 502015CF001540AXXXMB

.
Irving V. Brown, Florida City, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed

.

W ARNER , D AMOORGIAN and G ERBER , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### § 382.202 Annual charges under the Natural Gas Act and Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978 and related statutes.

The adjusted costs of administration of the natural gas regulatory program will be assessed against each natural gas pipeline company based on the proportion of the total gas subject to Commission regulation which was sold and transported by each company in the immediately preceding calendar year to the sum of the gas subject to the Commission regulation which was sold and transported in the immediately preceding calendar year by all natural gas pipeline companies being assessed annual charges.

[Order 472-B, 52 FR 36022, Sept. 25, 1987]
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 641 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 641

  To update the map of, and modify the maximum acreage available for 
            inclusion in, the Yucca House National Monument.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 4, 2019

  Mr. Gardner introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To update the map of, and modify the maximum acreage available for 
            inclusion in, the Yucca House National Monument.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Yucca House National Monument 
Boundary Revision Act''.

SEC. 2. YUCCA HOUSE NATIONAL MONUMENT BOUNDARY REVISION.

    (a) Boundary Revision.--The boundaries of the Yucca House National 
Monument are revised to include the approximately 160 acres of land 
generally depicted as ``Proposed Expansion Tract'' on the map entitled 
``Yucca House National Monument Proposed Boundary Revision'', numbered 
318/105,085, and dated August 2010.
    (b) Map.--The map described in subsection (a) shall be on file and 
available for public inspection in appropriate offices of the National 
Park Service.
    (c) Acquisition of Land.--
            (1) Method of acquisition.--Within the land described in 
        subsection (a), the Secretary of the Interior may acquire land 
        and interests in land by donation.
            (2) Administrative costs.--The Secretary of the Interior 
        may pay any administrative costs of acquiring land and 
        interests in land by donation under paragraph (1) with 
        appropriated funds.
                                 <all>
```
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Expands Healthy Food Financing Initiative to Local and 

Regional Partnerships

WASHINGTON, August 1, 2023 – The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) is 

expanding the Healthy Food Financing Initiative (HFFI) program to include publicprivate partnerships. USDA and Reinvestment Fund will invite applications for the Local 

and Regional Healthy Food Financing Partnerships Program (HFFI Partnerships 

Program) from August 1 to November 3. 

Reinvestment Fund is a national Community Development Financial Institution (CDFI) 

that serves as the fund manager and program administrator for HFFI. 

$30 million in HFFI Partnerships Program grants is available through the Biden-Harris 

Administration’s American Rescue Plan. Eligible applicants include new or existing 

regional, state, or local public-private partnerships working to improve access to fresh, 

healthy food in underserved communities through technical and financial assistance to 

food retailers and enterprises.

The HFFI Partnerships Program is a part of The Healthy Food Financing Initiative

(HFFI). HFFI works to improve access to healthy foods in underserved areas, create and 

preserve quality jobs and revitalize low-income communities. HFFI aims to build a more 

equitable food system that supports all Americans' health and economic vibrancy.

Reinvestment Fund will hold an informational webinar for interested applicants to the 

HFFI Partnerships Program on September 7 at 3:00 p.m. Eastern Time. For more 

information, including a link to the grant application, registration for the webinar, 

program updates and more, please visit www.investinginfood.com. Applications must be 

submitted to Reinvestment Fund no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on November 3. 

To learn more about the HFFI Partnerships Program, visit www.investinginfood.com

To subscribe to USDA Rural Development updates, visit GovDelivery subscriber page.

###

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender.
### §5527. Miscellaneous provisions

#### (a) Nonapplicability

Except to the extent the appropriate Federal agency or department head determines, the provisions of this chapter shall not apply to—

(1) programs or activities regarding computer systems that process classified information; or

(2) computer systems the function, operation, or use of which are those delineated in section 3552(b)(6)(A)(i) of title 44.

#### (b) Acquisition of prototype and early production models

In accordance with Federal contracting law, Federal agencies and departments participating in the Program may acquire prototype or early production models of new networking and information technology systems and subsystems to stimulate hardware and software development. Items of computing equipment acquired under this subsection shall be considered research computers for purposes of applicable acquisition regulations.

(Pub. L. 102–194, title II, §207, Dec. 9, 1991, 105 Stat. 1602; Pub. L. 114–329, title I, §105(p), Jan. 6, 2017, 130 Stat. 2984.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2017—Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 114–329, §105(p)(1), substituted "section 3552(b)(6)(A)(i) of title 44" for "paragraphs (1) through (5) of section 2315(a) of title 10".

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 114–329, §105(p)(2), substituted "networking and information technology" for "high-performance computing".