alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 154.400 Additional requirements.

In addition to the requirements of subparts A, B, and C of this part, any proposal to implement a limited rate change must comply with this subpart.
NO. 07-07-0314-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL C

	JULY 16, 2008

	______________________________

	TIMOTHY RAY WILLIAMS, 

									Appellant

	v.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

									Appellee

	________________________________

	FROM THE 181ST DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY;

	NO. 18246-B; HON. JOHN B. BOARD, PRESIDING

	_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

	After a jury trial, appellant, Timothy Ray Williams, was convicted of two counts of possession of a controlled substance.  His punishment was assessed by the jury at twenty years imprisonment.  Appellant timely filed his notice of appeal.  Appellant's appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw, together with an Anders1 brief, wherein he certified that, after diligently searching the record, appellant's appeal is without merit.  Along with his brief, counsel also filed a copy of a letter sent to appellant informing him of counsel's belief that there was no reversible error and of appellant's right to appeal pro se.  Appellant filed a pro se response on April 23, 2008.	

	In compliance with the principles enunciated in Anders, appellate counsel discussed potential grounds of error and then explained why they were meritless.  Thereafter, we conducted our own review of the record to assess the accuracy of appellate counsel's conclusions and to uncover any error, reversible or otherwise, pursuant to Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991), and concluded that none existed.

	Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is granted and the judgment is affirmed. 

							Brian Quinn 

						          Chief Justice 

Do not publish.
### §6204. Limitations on authority

Sections 6201, 6202, and 6203 of this title shall not apply with respect to the following antitrust evidence:

(1) Antitrust evidence that is received by the Attorney General or the Commission under section 18a of this title. Nothing in this paragraph shall affect the ability of the Attorney General or the Commission to disclose to a foreign antitrust authority antitrust evidence that is obtained otherwise than under section 18a of this title.

(2) Antitrust evidence that is matter occurring before a grand jury and with respect to which disclosure is prevented by Federal law, except that for the purpose of applying Rule 6(e)(3)(C)(iv) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure with respect to this section—

(A) a foreign antitrust authority with respect to which a particularized need for such antitrust evidence is shown shall be considered to be an appropriate official of any of the several States, and

(B) a foreign antitrust law administered or enforced by the foreign antitrust authority shall be considered to be a State criminal law.

(3) Antitrust evidence that is specifically authorized under criteria established by Executive Order 12356, or any successor to such order, to be kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign policy, and—

(A) that is classified pursuant to such order or such successor, or

(B) with respect to which a determination of classification is pending under such order or such successor.

(4) Antitrust evidence that is classified under section 2162 of title 42.

(Pub. L. 103–438, §5, Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4599.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Rule 6(e)(3)(C)(iv) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, referred to in par. (2), is set out in the Appendix to Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure.

Executive Order 12356, referred to in par. (3), is Ex. Ord. No. 12356, Apr. 2, 1982, 47 F.R. 14874, 15557, which was formerly set out as a note under section 435 (now section 3161) of Title 50, War and National Defense, was revoked by Ex. Ord. No. 12958, §6.1(d), Apr. 17, 1995, 60 F.R. 19843.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                     906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gouverneur Bancorp Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert J. Twyman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes
-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.


February 9, 2007                       By: /s/ ROBERT J. TWYMAN
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Robert J. Twyman
                                           Vice President and Chief Financial
                                           Officer




                                       27
### §1718. Rules, regulations, and orders

The Director shall have authority from time to time to make, issue, amend, and rescind such rules and regulations and such orders as are necessary or appropriate to the exercise of the functions and powers conferred upon him elsewhere in this chapter. For the purpose of his rules and regulations, the Director may classify persons and matters within his jurisdiction and prescribe different requirements for different classes of persons or matters.

(Pub. L. 90–448, title XIV, §1419, Aug. 1, 1968, 82 Stat. 598; Pub. L. 111–203, title X, §1098A(1), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 2105.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2010—Pub. L. 111–203 substituted "Director" for "Secretary" in two places.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2010 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 111–203 effective on the designated transfer date, see section 1100H of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as a note under section 552a of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### Effective Date

Section effective upon the expiration of two hundred and seventy days after Aug. 1, 1968, see section 1423 of Pub. L. 90–448, set out as a note under section 1701 of this title.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gouverneur Bancorp Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
J. Twyman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes -Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by
                  the Report.


May 11, 2006                      By: /s/ ROBERT J. TWYMAN
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Robert J. Twyman
                                      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code in accordance with Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall
not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be
deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act
of 1933 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                                       29
Unassociated Document


     

    June
      4,
      2008

    


    


    Mr.
      Michael Lamach

    107
      Eastham Court

    Mooresville,
      NC 28117 

    


    Dear
      Mike,

    


    As
      an
      addendum to our employment agreement (dated December 24, 2003), the following
      severance arrangements are being provided in the event of your involuntary
      termination from Ingersoll Rand for other than gross cause.

    


    
      	 	
              a.

            	
              Severance
                payment of eighteen months base salary if termination occurs before
                February 14, 2009 (within five years of date of hire); and twelve
                months
                base salary if termination occurs after this
                date.

            


    

    
      	 	
              b.

            	
              Full
                year payment of Annual Incentive Matrix (AIM) according to plan provisions
                up to target level.

            


    

    
      	 	
              c.

            	
              Stock
                Options: The special retention grant of 100,000 options to be awarded
                on
                the first trading day following the Trane closing will have the following
                special treatment:

            


    

    
      	 	
              i.

            	
              These
                options will become fully vested (accelerated) on the date of termination
                (as defined above);

            


    

    
      	 	
              ii.

            	
              They
                will remain exercisable for a period of 18 months following such
                termination. 

            


    

    
      	 	
              d.

            	
              Performance
                Share Program (PSP) or future Long Term Incentive Plan (LTIP):
                

            


    

    
      	 	
              i.

            	
              Current
                year Award: pro-rata payment of award earned as of termination date,
                paid
                according to the plan provisions up to
                target.

            


    

    
      	 	
              ii.

            	
              Prior
                year Award: Accelerated vesting to termination
                date.

            


    

    


    Sincerely,

    


    


    Herbert
      L. Henkel

    Chairman,
      President and 

    Chief
      Executive Officer

    


    
      	
              cc:

            	
              Marcia
                Avedon

            


    

    Rob
      Butler
The panel recommended that Boles be suspended from the

practice of law for two years, with the conditions that Boles be (1) required to retake the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination (MPRE) and attorney ethics portion of the Nevada Bar Examination prior to applying for reinstatement; (2) required to pay for the costs associated with the disciplinary proceeding pursuant to SCR 120; (3) within three days of the effective date of an order of suspension, required to demonstrate to bar counsel that he has notified all of his clients of his suspension; and (4) within fifteen days of an order of suspension, place all of his Nevada clients with other counsel, conclude representation, or, with the assistance of bar counsel, attempt to expeditiously aid any remaining clients in finding new counsel.

The findings and recommendations of a disciplinary board hearing panel are persuasive; however, our automatic review of a panel decision recommending a suspension is conducted de novo, requiring the exercise of independent judgment by this court. SCR 105(3)(b); In re Stubff 108 Nev. 629, 633, 837 P.2d 853, 855 (1992).

Having reviewed the briefs filed in this matter and the record of the disciplinary proceedings, we conclude that clear and convincing evidence supports the findings that Boles violated RPC 1.3 (diligence) and RPC 1.4 (communication). SCR 105(2)(e). We approve the panel's recommendation that Boles be suspended subject to conditions. However, we determine that a suspension of one year is appropriately tailored to the violations here. We therefore reject the recommended suspension term of two years and instead direct that Boles be suspended for one year.

Accordingly, Boles is hereby suspended from the practice of law for one year, subject to the conditions set forth above. Boles shall pay

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) I947A 2clesty

, J Parraguirre

Saitta , J.

, J. 

### I eikeil , C•J. Pickerin the costs of the disciplinary proceedings within 30 days of receipt of the Nevada State Bar's bill of costs. 

### See SCR 120. Boles and the state bar shall comply with the applicable provisions of SCR 115 and SCR 121.1.

It is so ORDERED.

Gibbons

cc: Thomas Susich, Chair, Southern Nevada Disciplinary Panel David Clark, Bar Counsel James Andre Boles, Esq. Kimberly Farmer, Executive Director, State Bar of Nevada Perry Thompson, Admissions Office, U.S. Supreme Court

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements of The Smithfield Companies,
Inc. for the six months ended September 30, 2000, and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       4,319,982
<SECURITIES>                                 1,809,813
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,439,060
<ALLOWANCES>                                    86,000
<INVENTORY>                                  4,785,991
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,788,609
<PP&E>                                       9,633,791
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,252,058
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,524,379
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,856,918
<BONDS>                                      2,800,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,004,195
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,863,266
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,524,379
<SALES>                                      8,319,551
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,367,210
<CGS>                                        5,607,370
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,324,905
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              78,791
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                288,655
<INCOME-TAX>                                    57,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            231,655
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   231,655
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary

                    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural Regulations (                    *See*14 CFR 301.201*et seq.*). The due date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate cases a final order without further proceedings.                

*Docket Number:*                     DOT-OST-2002-11481.                

*Date Filed:*                     February 22, 2011.                

*Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify Scope:*                     March 15, 2011.                

## Description

Application of Edelweiss Air AG requesting an amendment to its foreign air carrier permit in order to conduct scheduled and charter foreign air transportation of persons, property, and mail under the U.S.-Switzerland Air Transport Agreement (“Open Skies”) signed and effective June 21, 2010.

*Docket Number:*                     DOT-OST-2011-0032.                

*Date Filed:*                     February 22, 2011.                

*Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify Scope:*                     March 15, 2011.                

## Description

Application of Twin Cities Air Service, LLC requesting authority to operate scheduled passenger service as a commuter air carrier.

Renee V. Wright,

Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. 2011-5593 Filed 3-10-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
§ 1308.13 Time limits for decisions. ( a ) If a submitted claim involves $50,000 or less, the Contracting Officer shall issue the decision within 60 days from actual receipt of the claim. If a submitted claim involves more than $50,000, the Contracting Officer within 60 days from actual receipt shall either issue a decision or notify the Contractor of the date by which a decision shall be rendered, which shall be within a reasonable time. The Contracting Officer shall not be deemed to be in “actual receipt” of a claim until the claim meets all requirements of § 1308.2(c).
( b ) The Contracting Officer shall issue a decision within any time limits set by an order under § 1308.24. If a Hearing Officer grants a stay of an appeal pursuant to § 1308.25, the Contracting Officer shall issue a decision within any time limits specified by the stay order, or within a reasonable time after receipt of the stay, if it sets no time limits.
( c ) As used in this subpart, the reasonableness of a time period depends on the amount or kind of relief involved and complexity of the issues raised, the adequacy of the Contractor's supporting data, contractual requirements for auditing of Contractor's cost or other data, and other relevant factors.
### §1827. Utilization of personnel of Department of Agriculture and officers and employees of consenting States; technical and other nonfinancial assistance to State

#### (a) Assistance from Department of Agriculture and States

The Secretary, in carrying out the provisions of this chapter, shall utilize, to the maximum extent practicable, the existing personnel and facilities of the Department of Agriculture. The Secretary is further authorized to utilize the officers and employees of any State, with its consent, and with or without reimbursement, to assist him in carrying out the provisions of this chapter.

#### (b) Assistance to States

The Secretary may, upon request, provide technical and other nonfinancial assistance (including the lending of equipment on such terms and conditions as the Secretary determines is appropriate) to any State to assist it in administering and enforcing any law of such State designed to prohibit conduct described in section 1824 of this title.

(Pub. L. 91–540, §8, Dec. 9, 1970, 84 Stat. 1406; Pub. L. 94–360, §8, July 13, 1976, 90 Stat. 920.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1976—Pub. L. 94–360 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a) and added subsec. (b).
##### 



Exhibit 23

Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants

TBA Entertainment Corporation 
Encino, California

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File
No. 333-62507) and on Form S-8 (File
No. 333-62284) of TBA Entertainment Corporation of our
report dated February 21, 2003, except for Notes 1
and 5, which are as of April 10, 2003, relating to the consolidated
financial statements of TBA Entertainment Corporation as of
December 31, 2002 and for the year then ended, which report
is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP

Los Angeles, California 
April 15, 2003
### §3809. Authorization of appropriations; required funding

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary for purposes of carrying out this chapter, not to exceed $3,000,000 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1982, not less than one-half of which shall be for the purpose of making loans under section 3806(b) of this title; not to exceed $5,000,000 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1983, not less than one-half of which shall be for the purpose of making loans under section 3806(b) of this title; not to exceed $5,000,000 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1984, not less than one-half of which shall be for the purpose of making loans under section 3806(b) of this title; and such sums as may be necessary for the fiscal years ending September 30, 1985, and September 30, 1986. Any amount appropriated pursuant to this section shall remain available until expended.

(Pub. L. 96–512, §10, Dec. 12, 1980, 94 Stat. 2833.)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Alliance Laundry Systems LLC, Alliance Laundry Corporation and Alliance Laundry Holdings LLC (the Companies) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas F. LEsperance, Chief Executive Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ THOMAS F. LESPERANCE
|Chief Executive Officer  

November 9, 2009