alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 555.1 Transportation of fish products. ( a ) No person may sell, transport, offer for sale or transportation, or receive for transportation, in commerce, any fish or fish product that is capable of being used as human food and is adulterated or fails to bear an official inspection legend or is otherwise misbranded at the time of such sale, transportation, offer or receipt, except otherwise provided in this paragraph or in part 557 of this subchapter.
( b ) No person, engaged in the business of buying, selling, freezing, storing, or transporting, in or for commerce, fish products capable of use as human food, or importing such articles, shall transport, offer for transportation, or receive for transportation, in commerce or in any State designated under § 560.3 of this subchapter, any fish product which is capable of use as human food and is not wrapped, packaged, or otherwise enclosed to prevent adulteration by airborne contaminants, unless the railroad car, truck, or other means of conveyance in which the product is contained or transported is completely enclosed with tight fitting doors or other covers for all openings. In all cases, the means of conveyance shall be reasonably free of foreign matter (such as dust, dirt, rust, or other articles or residues), and free of chemical residues, so that product placed therein will not become adulterated.
( c ) Any cleaning compound, lye, soda solution, or other chemical used in cleaning the means of conveyance must be thoroughly removed from the means of conveyance prior to its use. Such means of conveyance onto which product is loaded, being loaded, or intended to be loaded, shall be subject to inspection by an inspector at any official establishment.
( d ) The decision whether or not to inspect a means of conveyance in a specific case, and the type and extent of such inspection shall be at the Agency's discretion and shall be adequate to determine if fish product in such conveyance is, or when moved could become, adulterated.
( e ) Circumstances of transport that can be reasonably anticipated shall be considered in making said determination. These include, but are not limited to, weather conditions, duration and distance of trip, nature of product covering, and effect of restowage at stops en route. Any means of conveyance found upon such inspection to be in such condition that fish product placed therein could become adulterated shall not be used until such condition which could cause adulteration is corrected.
Fish product placed in any means of conveyance that is found by the inspector to be in such condition that the fish product may have become adulterated shall be removed from the means of conveyance and handled in accordance with part 539 or § 540.3 of this subchapter.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-71,433]

                    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (“Act”), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on March 12, 2010, applicable to workers of Syncreon USA, Belvidere, Illinois. The workers provide metering, sequencing, kitting, and delivery services. The notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on April 23, 2010 (75 FR 21353).                

At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. New information shows that some workers separated from employment at Syncreon USA had their wages reported through a separate unemployment insurance (UI) tax account under the name TDS US Automotive.

Accordingly, the Department is amending this certification to properly reflect this matter.

The amended notice applicable to TA-W-71,433 is hereby issued as follows: 

All workers of Syncreon USA, formerly known as TDS US Automotive, Belvidere, Illinois, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after June 16, 2008, through March 12, 2012, and all workers in the group threatened with total or partial separation from employment on the date of certification through two years from the date of certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 24th day of February, 2011.

Michael W. Jaffe,

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2011-5480 Filed 3-9-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
#### § 154.601 Change in executed service agreement.

Agreements intended to effect a change or revision of an executed service agreement on file with the Commission must be in the form of a superseding executed service agreement only. Service agreements may not contain any supplements, but may contain exhibits which may be separately superseded. The exhibits may show, among other things, contract demand delivery points, delivery pressures, names of industrial customers of the distributor-customer, or names of distributors (with one distributor named as agent where delivery to several distributors is effected at the same delivery points).
###### Editorial Note on Part 28

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear at 76 FR 76873, Dec. 9, 2011.

#### § 28.47 Motion to quash.

Any person against whom a subpoena is directed may file a motion to quash or limit the subpoena setting forth the reasons why the subpoena should not be complied with or why it should be limited in scope. This motion shall be filed with the administrative judge within 20 days after service of the subpoena.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

 

**Independent Auditors’Consent**

 

 

The Board of Directors 

CellStar Corporation: 

 

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-87754, 333-23381, 333-77415 and333-89298) of CellStar Corporation of our report dated January 10, 2003, except for the fourth paragraph of note 6, which is as of February 28, 2003, and note 23, which is as of January 31, 2003, relating to the consolidated balance sheets ofCellStar Corporation and subsidiaries as of November 30, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year periodended November 30, 2002, and the related schedule, which report appears in the November 30, 2002 annual report on on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 2 of CellStar Corporation. 

 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

 

KPMG LLP 

 

 

Dallas, Texas 

April 23, 2003
#   2021-2022 NSDUH National Maps of Prevalence Estimates, by State

View national maps covering 35 measures of substance use and mental health by age group and state. The maps are based on the 2021-2022 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH). They use small area estimation (SAE) methods in which state-level NSDUH data are combined with other data from smaller geographies. The combined data are used to create modeled estimates of the civilian, noninstitutionalized population ages 12 and older for each state.

The map images are available as a PDF or HTM file.

National Survey on Drug Use and Health

### Part of Collection:

2021-2022 NSDUH State Estimates of Substance Use and Mental Disorders

                        -  View/Download Files 
                        -  Other Related Reports 
                        -  Report Resources 

### View/Download Files

                                    - 2021-2022 State Maps (pdf | 5.57 MB)
                                    - 2021-2022 State Maps (htm | 337.7 KB)

### Other Related Reports

2021-2022 NSDUH: Guide to State Tables and Summary of Small Area Estimation Methodology

Collected Date: 2021-2022 | Published Date: February 15, 2024 | Type: National Survey on Drug Use and Health

2021-2022 NSDUH: Model-Based Estimated Prevalence for States

Collected Date: 2021-2022 | Published Date: February 15, 2024 | Type: National Survey on Drug Use and Health

2021-2022 NSDUH: Model-Based Estimated Totals for States (in Thousands):

Collected Date: 2021-2022 | Published Date: February 15, 2024 | Type: National Survey on Drug Use and Health

2021-2022 NSDUH: Other Sources of State-Level Data

Collected Date: 2021-2022 | Published Date: February 15, 2024 | Type: National Survey on Drug Use and Health

2021-2022 NSDUH: State-Specific Tables

Collected Date: 2021-2022 | Published Date: February 15, 2024 | Type: National Survey on Drug Use and Health

Comparison Between 2021-2022 NSDUH State Prevalence Estimates

Collected Date: 2021-2022 | Published Date: February 15, 2024 | Type: National Survey on Drug Use and Health

### Report Resources

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Data Archive (SAMHDA)'s page about NSDUH.

 < Back to Main content
59–008 

110TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 110–184 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE BILL (H.R. 2638) MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY FOR THE 

FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2008, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES 

JUNE 11, 2007.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mrs. SLAUGHTER, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 473] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 473, by a record vote of 10 to 0, report the same to the 

House with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2638) 

making appropriations for the Department of Homeland Security 

for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2008, and for other purposes. The resolution provides for one hour of general debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority 

member of the Committee on Appropriations. 

The bill shall be considered as read. The resolution waives all 

points of order against consideration of the bill except those arising 

under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The resolution waives points of 

order against provisions in the bill for failure to comply with clause 

2 of rule XXI. During consideration of the bill for amendment, the 

Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in 

recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment has caused it to be printed in the Congressional Record. The 

resolution provides one motion to recommit with or without instructions. Finally, the resolution permits the Chair, during consideration of the bill in the House, to postpone further consideration 

of it to a time designated by the Speaker. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

Although the rule waives all points of order against consideration 

of the bill (except for those arising under clauses 9 or 10 of rule 

XXI) and against provisions of the bill for failure to comply with 

clause 2 of rule XXI, the Committee is not aware of any points of 

order against the bill or its consideration. The waivers of all points 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with REPORTS

2 

of order against the bill and its consideration (except for those arising under clauses 9 or 10 of rule XXI) are prophylactic in nature. 

COMMITTEE VOTES

The results of each record vote on an amendment or motion to 

report, together with the names of those voting for and against, are 

printed below: 

Rules Committee record vote No. 222 

Date: June 11, 2007. 

Measure: H.R. 2638. 

Motion by: Mr. McGovern. 

Summary of motion: To report the rule. 

Results: Adopted 10–0. 

Vote by Members: McGovern—Yea; Hastings (FL)—Yea; Matsui—Yea; Cardoza—Yea; Welch—Yea; Castor—Yea; Arcuri—Yea; 

Dreier—Yea; Hastings (WA)—Yea; Slaughter—Yea. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with REPORTS
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION








Each of the undersigned hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Columbus
McKinnon Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.








Dated:  August 5,
2009











/s/ Timothy T.
Tevens


Timothy
T. Tevens


Chief
Executive Officer


(Principal Executive
Officer)











/s/ Karen L.
Howard


Karen L.
Howard


Chief
Financial Officer


(Principal Financial
Officer)
Exhibit 10.1


 





RESOLUTION OF THE SHAREHOLDERS


 


OF


 


NUTS & BOLTS INTERNATIONAL INC.


 


 


 


 


The following is a
true copy of the resolution duly adopted by the Majority of the Shareholders of the Corporation at a special meeting, notice to
this meeting having been waived, held this 29th day of February, 2016


 


WHEREAS there has been
presented to and considered by this meeting a Motion to effectuate a new Board of Directors of the Company;


 


NOW THEREFORE BE IT
RESOLVED that the majority of shareholders having considered this matter, and having opened the floor to all those who voice a
preference in the issue and pursuant to NRS 78.320, have overwhelmingly decided and RESOLVED that we have elected:


 


Tan Sri Dato' Sri Lai
Teck Peng as Director


 


The Above qualified
Director, having been nominated, has accepted his position as DIRECTOR of the Company.


 


Said Motion is hereby
passed and the corporate books, records and the Company shall file this Resolution in the corporate records.


 


 


 


Dated: 29th
February, 2016


 


 


/s/Tan Sri Dato' Sri Lai Teck Peng





 






Tan Sri Dato' Sri Lai Teck Peng,


on behalf of the Majority Shareholders
**Exhibit 24.2**

**POWER-OF-ATTORNEY**

**Annual Reports on Form 10-KofFinancial Security Assurance Holdings Ltd.**

The undersigned, as a director of Financial SecurityAssurance Holdings Ltd., a New York corporation (the “Company”), and/or, asapplicable, as an officer of the Company, does hereby constitute and appointeach of Robert P. Cochran, Séan W. McCarthy and Bruce E. Stern to be her agentand attorney-in-fact, with the power to act fully hereunder and with full powerof substitution to act in the name and on behalf of the undersigned, (i) tosign in the name and on behalf of the undersigned, as a director and/or officerof the Company, as applicable, and file with the Securities and ExchangeCommission, an Annual Report on Form 10-K for each fiscal year forwhich the Company is required to file such an Annual Report, and any amendmentsor supplements thereto, and (ii) to execute and deliver any instruments,certificates or other documents which he shall deem necessary or proper inconnection with the filing of each such Annual Report on Form 10-K,and any such amendment or supplement thereto, and generally to act for and inthe name of the undersigned with respect to each such filing as fully as couldthe undersigned if then personally present and acting. The foregoingPower-of-Attorney shall be in full force and effect for so long as theundersigned shall be a director or officer of the Company, as applicable,unless and until revoked as to the undersigned by written instrument deliveredby him to the Secretary of the Company.

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Power-of-Attorney on February 15,2007.

| /s/ MICHÈLE COLIN |   |
|------------------------|--------|
| Michèle Colin     |   |

 

----
Exhibit 23.1


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


 As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the inclusion of our
 reports dated December 1, 2000,  in Dial-Thru  International   Corporation's
 Annual Report on Form 10-K for  the years ended October  31, 2000 and  1999,
 as well    as  the incorporation  by  reference  of such  reports  into  the
 Company's previously filed Registration   Statement  File   No.   333-86749,
 333-23313,  333-33523, 333-36040, 333-52870, 333-71401 and 333-71406.


  /s/ KING GRIFFIN & ADAMSON P.C.
### SUBCHAPTER II—EDUCATION AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

March 21, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
135402 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 135402 COA: 267679 Washtenaw CC: 05-000093-FH ANDRE FARAH BOND, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 16, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take ot her peremptory action. MCR 7.302(G)(1). At oral argument the parties shall address the interpretation and application of the "use of authority" la nguage in the criminal sexual c onduct statutes, MCL 750.520 et seq . The parties may file supplemental briefs w ithin 42 days of the date of this order, but they should not submit mere restat ements of their application papers.

The Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan and the Criminal Defense Attorneys of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the issue presented in this case may move th e Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.

p0318 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 21, 2008

Clerk
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-13-00452-CV

IN RE WILLA PETERS HUBBERD TESTAMENTARY TRUST

From the Probate Court No. 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1986-PC-1440

Honorable Tom Rickhoff, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE, JUSTICE BARNARD, AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the portions of the probate court’s 

orders adding the following provisions to the Willa Peters Hubberd Testamentary Trust as Article 

VI, Paragraphs A-3, A-4, A-5, and A-6 are AFFIRMED:

A-3. Mary Hubberd Dahlman shall apply for Medicare and a Medicare 

Supplemental Insurance policy. If Mary Hubberd Dahlman is unsuccessful for any 

reason, in obtaining such insurance, she shall obtain such other health insurance as 

might be available.

A-4 Michael Hubberd has health insurance through his employer. 

Michael Hubberd shall provide proof of such insurance to the Trustee on an annual 

basis. If at any time Michael Hubberd does not have his own health insurance 

coverage through his employer or otherwise, he shall obtain such other health 

insurance as might be available.

A-5. If Mary Hubberd Dahlman, for any reason, does not possess general 

liability insurance in a minimum amount of $1 million, she or the Trustee shall 

obtain such insurance as might be available.

A-6. If Michael Hubberd, for any reason, does not possess general 

liability insurance in a minimum amount of $1 million, he or the Trustee shall 

obtain such insurance as might be available.

The remaining portions of the probate court’s orders adding additional language to Article VI, 

Paragraphs A-3, A-4, A-5, and A-6 of the trust are REVERSED, and judgment is RENDERED
04-13-00452-CV

deleting this additional language from the trust. It is ORDERED that costs of the appeal are taxed 

against the parties who incurred them.

SIGNED February 12, 2014.

_____________________________

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

- 2 -
Exhibit 32.2



Section 1350 Certification

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of MK Resources Company (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John C. Farmer, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ John C. Farmer                   
|John C. Farmer                       
|Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
|March 30, 2005
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Elisha Linville, Appellant

No. 06-16-00055-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 66th District Court of Hill 

County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 39,010). 

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice 

Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the judgment 

of the court below. Therefore, we modify the trial court’s judgment by deleting the entry under 

the “Terms of Plea Bargain” section. As modified, we affirm the judgment.

We note that the appellant, Elisha Linville, has adequately indicated his inability to pay 

costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED AUGUST 18, 2016

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk