alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Pamela J. Montpelier, hereby certify that:



(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Service Bancorp, Inc.;



(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



(4) The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



(5) The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal controls over financial reporting.



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/ PAMELA J. MONTPELIER
|Pamela J. Montpelier    
|Chief Executive Officer 
|November 10, 2004
§ 93.318 Special provisions. ( a ) *In-bond shipments from Canada.* ( 1 ) Horses from Canada transported in-bond through the United States for immediate export shall be inspected at the border port of entry and, when accompanied by an import permit obtained under § 93.304 of this part and all conditions therein are observed, shall be allowed entry into the United States and shall be otherwise handled as provided in paragraph (b) of § 93.301. Horses not accompanied by a permit shall meet the requirements of this part in the same manner as horses destined for importation into the United States, except that the Administrator may permit their inspection at some other point when he or she finds that such action will not increase the risk that communicable diseases of livestock and poultry will be disseminated to the livestock or poultry of the United States.
( 2 ) *In-transit shipments through Canada.* Horses originating in the United States and transported directly through Canada may re-enter the United States without Canadian health or test certificates when accompanied by copies of the United States export health certificates properly issued and endorsed in accordance with regulations in part 91 of this chapter: *Provided,* That, to qualify for entry, the date, time, port of entry, and signature of the Canadian Port Veterinarian that inspected the horses for entry into Canada shall be recorded on the United States health certificate, or a paper containing the information shall be attached to the certificate that accompanies the horses. In all cases it shall be determined by the veterinary inspector at the United States port of entry that the horses are the identical horses covered by said certificate.
( b ) *Exhibition horses.* Except as provided in § 93.317(b), horses from the United States which have been exhibited at the Royal Agricultural Winter Fair at Toronto or other publicly recognized expositions in Canada, including racing, horse shows, rodeo, circus, or stage exhibitions in Canada, and have not been in that region for more than 90 days are eligible for return to the United States without Canadian health or test certificates, if they are accompanied by copies of the United States health certificate, issued and endorsed in accordance with the export regulations contained in part 91 of this chapter for entry into Canada: *Provided,* That in the case of horses for exhibition, including race horses, the certificates shall certify that negative results were obtained from official tests for equine infectious anemia for which blood samples were drawn within 180 days of the date that the horses are offered for return to the United States: *And, provided further,* That all horses offered for re-entry upon examination by the veterinary inspector at the U.S. port of entry, are found by the inspector to be free of communicable diseases and exposure thereto and are determined to be the identical horses covered by said certificates or are the natural increase of such horses born after official test dates certified on the dam's health certificate.
[55 FR 31495, Aug. 2, 1990. Redesignated and amended at 62 FR 56012, 56017, Oct. 28, 1997]
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT


Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)February 7, 2011





Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc.


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





Delaware

000-23143

13-3379479(State or other jurisdiction

of incorporation)

(Commission

File Number)

(IRS Employer

Identification No.)777 Old Saw Mill River Road, Tarrytown, New York

10591(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)Registrant's telephone number, including area code (914) 789-2800





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (seeGeneral Instruction A.2. below):








oWritten communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





oSoliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)




oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))




oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))











Item 8.01.  Other Events.





On February 7, 2011, Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ: PGNX) and Salix Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. (NASDAQ: SLXP) announced that they have entered into an exclusive worldwide (except Japan) agreement by which Salix has licensed rights to RELISTOR® (methylnaltrexone bromide).




A copy of the companies’ press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and the information contained therein is incorporated by reference into this Item 8.01 of this Current Report on Form 8-K.





Item 9.01.  Financial Statements and Exhibits.





(d) Exhibits





Exhibit No.     Description





99.1
Press Release dated February 7, 2011.




















SIGNATURES








Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.








PROGENICS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.


By:/s/ ROBERT A. MCKINNEY


Robert A. McKinney


Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President,


Finance & Operations and Treasurer











Date:  February 7, 2011
#### § 385.1907 Reports of compliance (Rule 1907).

When any licensee, permittee, or any other person subject to the jurisdiction of the Commission is required to do or perform any act by Commission order, permit, or license provision, there must be filed with the Commission within 30 days following the date when such requirement became effective, a notice, under oath, stating that such requirement has been met or complied with; *Provided, however,* That the Commission, by rule or order, or by making specific provision therefor in a license or permit, may provide otherwise for the giving of such notice of compliance. Five conformed copies of such notice must be filed in lieu of the fourteen conformed copies required by Rule 2004 (copies of filings).
LiDAR Drone Services, LLC

Post Flight Checklist

A. Aircraft

a. Unplug flight battery.

b. Unplug video transmitter battery.

c. Check aircraft temperatures of motors and other electronics.

d. Check hardware on aircraft to ensure tightness.

e. Check propellers for any indications of chips, cracks, or wear beyond safe

serviceability

f. Store aircraft in case

g. Put batteries back into storage cases.

B. Batteries

a. Check temperature of batteries

b. Check batteries for any indication of swelling

c. Check overall voltage of battery packs

d. Check individual cell voltages in battery packs

e. Put batteries on storage charge.

C. Camera & LiDAR

a. Verify that recording has stopped.

b. Turn off camera & LiDAR

c. Remove camera from gimbal.

D. Radios

a. Turn off radios.

b. Put radios back into cases.

E. Ground stations

a. Turn off ground stations.

b. Unplug batteries from ground stations.

c. Check antennas on ground stations for serviceability .

d. Pack ground stations into cases.

F. Other

a. Clean up all trash and debris in area.

b. Notify property owners of departure.
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**Gables Residential Trust2859 Paces Ferry RoadSuite 1450Atlanta,  Georgia  30339**March 25, 2002

United States Securities and Exchange Commission450 Fifth Street, N.W.Washington,  D.C.  20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Arthur Andersen LLP ("Andersen") hasrepresented to Gables Residential Trust (the "Company") as follows inconnection with its audit of the Company's consolidated financial statements forthe year ended December 31, 2001 and its report dated March 8, 2002:

-  that the audit was subject to Andersen's    quality control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing practice to    provide reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance    with professional standards,-  that there was appropriate continuity of    Andersen personnel working on the audit and availability of national office    consultation and-  that availability of personnel at foreign    affiliates of Andersen was not relevant to the audit.
This letter is based solely upon writtenrepresentations dated March 25, 2002 received from Andersen.

Very truly yours,

 

GABLES RESIDENTIAL TRUST

By:  /s/ Marvin R. Banks, Jr.Name: Marvin R. Banks, Jr.Title:  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
§ 16.21 Operation of projects with a minor or minor part license not subject to sections 14 and 15 of the Federal Power Act after expiration of a license. ( a ) A licensee of a minor or minor part project not subject to sections 14 and 15 of the Federal Power Act that has filed an application for a subsequent license or exemption may continue to operate the project in accordance with the terms and conditions of the license after the minor or minor part license expires until the Commission acts on its application.
( b ) If the licensee of a minor or minor part project not subject to sections 14 and 15 of the Federal Power Act has not filed an application for a subsequent license or exemption, the Commission may issue an order requiring the licensee to continue to operate its project in accordance with the terms and conditions of the license until the Commission either acts on any applications for subsequent license timely filed by another entity or takes action pursuant to §§ 16.25 or 16.26.
EXHIBIT 21


                        SUBSIDIARIES OF KU ENERGY AND KU



                                                         State or Jurisdiction
          Name                                            of Incorporation

  KU Energy Corporation                                       Kentucky
    KU Capital Corporation*                                   Kentucky
    Kentucky Utilities Company*                          Kentucky and Virginia
       Electric Energy, Inc.**                                Illinois




   * KU Energy Corporation owns 100% of the common stock of KU Capital
     Corporation and Kentucky Utilities Company.
  ** Kentucky  Utilities  Company  owns  20% of the Common Stock of Electric
     Energy, Inc.











                                      -257-
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 23.1






INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
333-24695, No. 333-44923, No. 333-45327, No. 333-59779, and No. 333-85143 of
ENCAD, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated February 20, 2001, appearing in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of ENCAD, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2000.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

San Diego, California
March 27, 2001
#### § 367.9070 Account 907, Supervision.

This account must include the cost of labor and expenses incurred in the general direction and supervision of customer service activities, the object of which is to encourage safe, efficient and economical use of the associate utility company's service. Direct supervision of a specific activity within customer service and informational expense classification must be charged to the account wherein the costs of such activity are included (*See* Operating Expense Instructions in § 367.80).
#### § 2.51 [Reserved]
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

BRIAN CECILIO RODRIGUEZ, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-50361

D.C. No. 2:17-cr-00219-PA

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Percy Anderson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 12, 2018**

Before: LEAVY, HAWKINS, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

Brian Cecilio Rodriguez appeals from the district court’s judgment and 

challenges the 30-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for 

conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, and aggravated identity theft, in 

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028A(a)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

SEP 18 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 17-50361 

§ 1291, and we affirm.

Rodriguez contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to 

explain the sentence, specifically the disparity between Rodriguez’s 30-month 

sentence and his co-defendant’s 25-month sentence. The district court adequately 

explained the reasons for Rodriguez’s low-end sentence. See United States v. 

Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 992 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc). The district court was not 

required to “tick off each of the [18 U.S.C.] § 3553(a) factors to show that it ha[d] 

considered them.” Id. Nor did Rodriguez raise arguments that would have 

warranted a more fulsome explanation. See Rita v. United States, 551 U.S. 338, 

356-58 (2007). 

To the extent Rodriguez argues that his sentence has resulted in an 

unwarranted disparity with his co-defendant, the record belies this contention.

AFFIRMED.
#### § 141.61 [Reserved]
### §657. Repealed. Sept. 21, 1944, ch. 412, §601(d), 58 Stat. 741, eff. July 1, 1944

Section, act July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §3, 39 Stat. 361, as amended by acts Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 252, title III, §302, 42 Stat. 1473; Mar. 4, 1925, ch. 524, §3, 43 Stat. 1262; June 26, 1930, ch. 613, 46 Stat. 815, related to payment of salaries and expenses of certain employees of Federal Farm Loan Bureau.
#### Alfred Richards, Respondent, v. Candee & Krekeler Company, Appellant.

Judgment of the Municipal Court affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Woodward, Jenks, Gaynor and Miller, JJ., concurred; Hooker, J., dissented.
// https://github.com/ireade/accessible-modal-dialog
function Dialog(dialogEl, overlayEl) {

    this.dialogEl = dialogEl;
    this.overlayEl = overlayEl;
    this.focusedElBeforeOpen;

    var focusableEls = this.dialogEl.querySelectorAll('a[href], area[href], input:not([disabled]), select:not([disabled]), textarea:not([disabled]), button:not([disabled]), [tabindex="0"]');
    this.focusableEls = Array.prototype.slice.call(focusableEls);

    this.firstFocusableEl = this.focusableEls[0];
    this.lastFocusableEl = this.focusableEls[ this.focusableEls.length - 1 ];

    this.close(); // Reset
}


Dialog.prototype.open = function() {

    var Dialog = this;

    this.dialogEl.removeAttribute('aria-hidden');
    this.overlayEl.removeAttribute('aria-hidden');
    this.dialogEl.style.display = 'block';
    this.overlayEl.style.display = 'block';

    this.focusedElBeforeOpen = document.activeElement;

    this.dialogEl.addEventListener('keydown', function(e) {
        Dialog._handleKeyDown(e);
    });

    this.overlayEl.addEventListener('click', function() {
        Dialog.close();
    });

    this.firstFocusableEl.focus();
};

Dialog.prototype.close = function() {

    this.dialogEl.setAttribute('aria-hidden', true);
    this.overlayEl.setAttribute('aria-hidden', true);
    this.dialogEl.style.display = 'none';
    this.overlayEl.style.display = 'none';

    if ( this.focusedElBeforeOpen ) {
        this.focusedElBeforeOpen.focus();
    }
};


Dialog.prototype._handleKeyDown = function(e) {

    var Dialog = this;
    var KEY_TAB = 9;
    var KEY_ESC = 27;

    function handleBackwardTab() {
        if ( document.activeElement === Dialog.firstFocusableEl ) {
            e.preventDefault();
            Dialog.lastFocusableEl.focus();
        }
    }
    function handleForwardTab() {
        if ( document.activeElement === Dialog.lastFocusableEl ) {
            e.preventDefault();
            Dialog.firstFocusableEl.focus();
        }
    }

    switch(e.keyCode) {
        case KEY_TAB:
            if ( Dialog.focusableEls.length === 1 ) {
                e.preventDefault();
                break;
            }
            if ( e.shiftKey ) {
                handleBackwardTab();
            } else {
                handleForwardTab();
            }
            break;
        case KEY_ESC:
            Dialog.close();
            break;
        default:
            break;
    }


};


Dialog.prototype.addEventListeners = function(openDialogSel, closeDialogSel) {

    var Dialog = this;

    var openDialogEls = document.querySelectorAll(openDialogSel);
    for ( var i = 0; i < openDialogEls.length; i++ ) {
        openDialogEls[i].addEventListener('click', function() {
            Dialog.open();
        });
    }

    var closeDialogEls = document.querySelectorAll(closeDialogSel);
    for ( var i = 0; i < closeDialogEls.length; i++ ) {
        closeDialogEls[i].addEventListener('click', function() {
            Dialog.close();
        });
    }

};
§ 16.25 Disposition of a project for which no timely application is filed following a notice of intent to file. ( a ) If an existing licensee that indicates in the notice filed pursuant to § 16.6 that it will file an application for new license, nonpower license, subsequent license, or an exemption does not file its application individually or in conjunction with an entity or entities that are not currently licensees of the project at least 24 months before its existing license expires in the case of licenses subject to sections 14 and 15 of the Federal Power Act, or by the deadlines specified in § 16.20(c) in the case of licenses not subject to sections 14 and 15 of the Federal Power Act, and no other applicant files an application within the appropriate time or all pending applications filed before the applicable filing deadline are subsequently rejected or dismissed pursuant to § 4.32 of this chapter, the Commission will publish in the Federal Register and once in a daily or weekly newspaper published in the county or counties in which the project or any part thereof or the lands affected thereby are situated, notice soliciting applications from potential applicants other than the existing licensee.
( b ) A potential applicant that files a notice of intent within 90 days from the date of the public notice issued pursuant to paragraph (a): ( 1 ) May apply for a license under Part I of the Federal Power Act and part 4 of this chapter (except § 4.38) within 18 months of the date on which it files its notice; and
( 2 ) Must comply with the requirements of § 16.8 and, if the project would have a total installed capacity of over 2,000 horsepower, § 16.10.
( c ) The existing licensee must file a schedule for the filing of a surrender application for the project, for the approval of the Director of the Office of Energy Projects, 90 days: ( 1 ) After the due date established for any notice of intent issued under paragraph (a), if no notices of intent were received; or
( 2 ) After the due date for any application filed under paragraph (b)(1), if no application has been filed.
( d ) Any application for surrender must be filed according to the approved schedule, must comply with the requirements of § 16.8 and part 6 of this chapter, and must provide for disposition of any project facility.
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Service Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Pamela J. Montpelier, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to her best knowledge:





(1)    The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/S/    PAMELA J. MONTPELIERPamela J. Montpelier Chief Executive Officer November 14, 2002
#### § 72.9 Interstate movements of cattle; inspection and certification by APHIS inspector required.

All interstate movements of inspected and certified and dipped and certified cattle shall be accompanied to final destination by a certificate of an APHIS inspector (which certificate shall show that the cattle so being moved have been dipped as required by § 72.6 or by § 72.7 and are free of ticks, or have been inspected as required by § 72.8 and are free of ticks); all such certificates shall be handled, delivered, kept, and preserved in accordance with the provisions of § 72.16; and all such cattle shall be handled through noninfectious pens, alleys, and chutes, and when shipped shall be loaded into clean and disinfected cars or trucks, and shall not be unloaded in the quarantined area except at such points reserved for noninfested cattle as may from time to time be authorized by APHIS.

[28 FR 5940, June 13, 1963, as amended at 56 FR 51975, Oct. 17, 1991]