alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Antony Koblish, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Orthovita, Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

Date: November 16, 2006



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Antony Koblish     
|Antony Koblish         
|Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 20.1
                                                     ------------
Chase Manhattan Bank Grantor Trust 1995-B


From: The Chase Manhattan Bank

To:   Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.


                   MONTHLY CERTIFICATEHOLDER'S REPORT
                   ----------------------------------

Due Period 21 Beginning Date                     07/01/1997
Due Period 21 End Date                           07/31/1997
Determination Date                               08/08/1997
Remittance Date                                  08/15/1997


I.    Monthly Principal and Principal Carryover Shortfall to Certificateholders
      (Per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                  $ 24.0668948208

II.   Monthly Interest and Unpaid Interest to Certificateholders
      (Per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                   $ 2.0045940613

III.  Monthly Expenses Summary

      A. Servicing Fee Disbursement                                $ 508,271.00
      B. Cash Collateral Account Expense                                 $ 0.00
      C. Total Expenses paid
         (per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                $ 0.3397617064

IV.   Cash Collateral Account Deposit Amount                             $ 0.00

V.    Outstanding Advance Summary

      A. From Prior Period                                       $ 4,067,944.59
      B. From Current Period                                     $ 3,995,675.18
      C. Change in Amount Between Periods (Lines B - A)            $ -72,269.41

VI.   Pool Factor Information

      A. Certificate Principal Balance                         $ 573,922,010.33
      B. Initial Certificate Balance                         $ 1,495,963,171.74
      C. Pool Factor (Lines A / B)                               0.383647151997

VII.  Available Cash Collateral Account Information for Due Period

      A. Available Cash Collateral Amount                       $ 30,496,259.93
      B. Available Cash Collateral Amount Percentage            4.999999999672%

VIII. Required Cash Collateral Amount

      A. For the Current Collection Period                      $ 30,496,259.93
      B. For the Next Collection Period                         $ 28,696,100.52
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Jean-Jacques Gauthier, Chief Financial Officer of Lafarge, a société anonyme organized under French law, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Lafarge on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, to my knowledge, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Lafarge as of the dates and for the periods set forth therein.:









|Date: March 24, 2006 | /s/   Jean-Jacques Gauthier
Jean-Jacques Gauthier
      Executive
        Vice President and CFO
|-------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------









A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Lafarge and will be retained by Lafarge and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §319. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act June 3, 1948, ch. 400, title III, 62 Stat. 328, was from the Department of Commerce Appropriation Act, 1949, and was not repeated in subsequent appropriations acts. Similar provisions were contained in prior appropriations acts back to 1925. Section related to printing by Weather Bureau. See section 326 of this title.
#### § 381.524 Voluntary withdrawal.

A selected establishment that is in full compliance with the requirements in this part may voluntarily end its participation in a cooperative interstate shipment program and operate under the cooperative State poultry products inspection program. Establishments that voluntarily end their participation in the cooperative may re-apply for the program after operating under the cooperative State poultry products inspection program for one year.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 49 (Monday, March 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 13667]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5654]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-72,375, TA-W-72,375A]


Commercial Furniture Group, Inc., Formerly Known as Falcon 
Products, Inc., Shelby Williams, Howe and Thonet, Including On-Site 
Leased Workers From Staffing Solutions, Morristown, TN, and Commercial 
Furniture Group, Inc., Formerly Known as Falcon Products, Inc., Shelby 
Williams, Howe and Thonet, Chicago, IL; Amended Certification Regarding 
Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(``Act''), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a 
Certification of Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance 
on May 5, 2010, applicable to workers of Commercial Furniture Group, 
Inc., including on-site leased workers from Staffing Solutions, 
Morristown, Tennessee. The workers are engaged in employment related to 
the production of commercial wooded furniture. The notice was published 
in the Federal Register on May 28, 2010 (75 FR 30070). The notice was 
amended on February 17, 2011 to include another location of the subject 
firm. The notice will be published soon in the Federal Register.
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm.
    New information shows that Commercial Furniture Group, Inc. is 
formerly known as Falcon Products, Inc., Shelby Williams, Howe and 
Thonet. New information shows that some workers separated from 
employment at Commercial Furniture Group, Inc., had their wages 
reported through separate unemployment (UI) tax accounts under the 
names Falcon Products, Inc., Shelby Williams, Howe and Thonet.
    Accordingly, the Department is amending this certification to 
properly reflect this matter.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-72,375 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Commercial Furniture Group, Inc., formerly known 
as Falcon Products, Inc., Shelby Williams, Howe and Thonet, 
including on-site leased workers from Staffing Solutions, 
Morristown, Tennessee (TA-W-72,375) and Commercial Furniture Group, 
Inc., formerly known as Falcon Products, Inc., Shelby Williams, Howe 
and Thonet, Chicago, Illinois (TA-W-72,375A), who became totally or 
partially separated from employment on or after September 21, 2008, 
through May 5, 2012, and all workers in the group threatened with 
total or partial separation from employment on date of certification 
through two years from the date of certification, are eligible to 
apply for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the 
Trade Act of 1974, as amended.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 3rd day of March 2011.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011-5654 Filed 3-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gouverneur Bancorp Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
F. Bennett, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes -Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.


May 11, 2005                           By: /s/ RICHARD F. BENNETT
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Richard F. Bennett
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer


         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code in accordance with Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall
not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be
deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act
of 1933 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.


                                       25
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000835663
<NAME> THE GLENMEDE FUND
<SERIES NUMBER>  4
[NAME] INTERNATIONAL PORTFOLIO
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       12 MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR END>                  31-Oct-99
<PERIOD-END>                       31-Oct-99
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>               1,107,137,521
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>              1,485,156,802
<RECEIVABLES>                         259,358,528
<ASSETS-OTHER>                              4,332
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      1,744,519,662
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                        0
<OTHER-ITEMS LIABILITIES>             243,960,776
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                   243,960,776
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>            1,157,663,918
<SHARES-COMMON-CURRENT>                83,978,373
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                  72,470,834
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>             (35,130,541)
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                        (4)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                        0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>              378,025,513
<NET-ASSETS>                        1,500,558,886
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                      32,510,634
<INTEREST-INCOME>                       1,692,125
<OTHER-INCOME>                            702,532
<EXPENSES-NET>                          1,524,714
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                33,380,577
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>               84,487,501
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>             167,555,024
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                 285,423,102
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>              43,332,727
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>               81,571,581
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                           0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                12,945,606
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>             5,860,128
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                     4,422,061
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                365,367,081
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>               (17,627,747)
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>             (21,961,608)
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                         0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                      0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                           0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                         1,524,714
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                1,325,034,404
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                       15.66
<PER-SHARE-NII>                              0.48
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                      3.33
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                         0.57
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                    1.03
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                         0.00
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                          17.87
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                              0.11%



</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7291

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RAYMOND THOMAS OECHSLE, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief

District Judge. (CR-94-57, CA-97-892-5-BO)

Submitted: January 5, 1999 Decided: January 20, 1999

Before ERVIN, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raymond Thomas Oechsle, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John Samuel Bowler,

Assistant United States Attorney, Fenita Morris Shepard, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Raymond Thomas Oechsle, Jr., seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255

(West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on

the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Oechsle,

Nos. CR-94-57; CA-97-892-5-BO (E.D.N.C. June 10, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

December 13, 2011

No. 1 1

- 1250 & 11

- 1590

MARS HOME FOR YOUTH,

Petitioner /Cross Respondent

v.

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,

Respondent/Cross Petitioner

THE PENNSYLVANIA SOCIAL SERVICES UNION, LOCAL 668 OF

THE SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL

- CIO,

Intervenor

( NLRB

- 1: 6CA

- 3 7135)

Present: MCKEE

, Chief Judge, FUENTES and GREENBERG

, Circuit Judge s.

Motion b y Respondent/Cross Petitioner, National Labor Relations Board, to

Publish an Unreported Decision.

Respectfully,

Maria L. Reyes, Case Manager

____________ ________ _____________ORDER________________________________

The foregoing motion is granted.

B y the Court,

/s/ Julio M. Fuentes

Circuit Judge

Dated : January 19, 2012

c c: Ronald J. Andrykovitch, Esq.

Ruth E. Burdick, Esq.Chairman Linda Dreeben, Esq.

MacKenzie Fillow, Esq.

Amy H. Ginn, Esq.

Jill A. Griffin, Esq.

Jessi D. Herman, Esq.

Usha Dheenan, Esq.

Claudia Davidson, Esq
### §2157. Flag officers

During any period in which the Coast Guard is not operating as a service in the Navy, section 1216(d) of title 10 does not apply with respect to flag officers of the Coast Guard.

(Added Pub. L. 113–281, title II, §212(a), Dec. 18, 2014, 128 Stat. 3029, §296; renumbered §2157, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §112(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4216.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 296 of this title as this section.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6014

FREDERICK WILLIAMS, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia

Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.

(CA-01-368)

Submitted: February 21, 2002 Decided: March 7, 2002

Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frederick Williams, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Richard Bain Smith,

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Frederick Williams, Jr., appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. See Williams v. Angelone, No. CA-01-368 (E.D.

Va. Dec. 13, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
### SUBCHAPTER I—DECLARATION OF FINDINGS, PURPOSES, AND POLICIES
# C_2013026EN.01004003.xml

| 26.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/40

---

Judgment of the General Court of 29 November 2012 — Adamowski v OHIM — Fagumit (FAGUMIT)

(Joined Cases T-537/10 and T-538/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community word mark Fagumit and Community figurative mark FAGUMIT - Earlier national figurative mark FAGUMIT - Relative ground for invalidity - Article 8(3) and Article 165(4)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2013/C 26/77

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Ursula Adamowski (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: D. von Schultz, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Fabryka Węży Gumowych i Tworzyw Sztucznych Fagumit sp. z o.o. (Fagumit) (Wolbrom, Poland) (represented by: M. Krekora, T. Targosz and P. Podrecki, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Two actions brought against two decisions of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 September 2010 (Cases R 1002/2009-1 and R 1003/2009-1), concerning invalidity proceedings between Fabryka Węży Gumowych i Tworzyw Sztucznych Fagumit sp. z o.o. and Ursula Adamowski.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Orders that Cases T-537/10 and T-538/10 be joined for the purposes of judgment; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Orders that Cases T-537/10 and T-538/10 be joined for the purposes of judgment;

| 2. | Dismisses the actions; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the actions;

| 3. | Orders Ursula Adamowski to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) and by Fabryka Węży Gumowych i Tworzyw Sztucznych Fagumit sp. z o.o. relating to the proceedings before the Court. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Ursula Adamowski to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) and by Fabryka Węży Gumowych i Tworzyw Sztucznych Fagumit sp. z o.o. relating to the proceedings before the Court.

---

(1)  OJ C 30, 29.1.2011.

1

---
# C_2012379EN.01001202.xml

| 8.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 379/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 379/12

---

Order of the Court of 18 September 2012 — Omnicare Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), Astellas Pharma GmbH

(Case C-588/11 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Application for registration of the word sign ‘OMNICARE’ - Opposition - Decision of the Board of Appeal rejecting the application - Action - Judgment of the General Court dismissing that action - Withdrawal of the opposition - Appeal - No need to adjudicate)

2012/C 379/20

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Omnicare Inc. (represented by: M. Edenborough, QC)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent), Astellas Pharma GmbH (represented by: M.L. Polo Carreño, abogada)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 9 September 2011 in Case T-290/09 Omnicare v OHIM — Astellas Pharma (OMNICARE) in which the General Court dismissed an action, brought by the applicant for the word mark ‘OMNICARE’ for services in Class 42, for the annulment of Decision R 402/2008-4 of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 14 May 2009 annulling the Opposition Division’s decision rejecting the opposition brought by the proprietor of the national mark ‘OMNICARE’ for services in Classes 35, 41 and 42 — Interpretation and application of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Notion of genuine use of an earlier mark — Mark used for services provided free of charge

Omnicare

OHIM — Astellas Pharma (OMNICARE)

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no need to adjudicate on the appeal brought by Omnicare Inc. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no need to adjudicate on the appeal brought by Omnicare Inc.

| 2. | Omnicare Inc. shall pay the costs incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) in the course of the present proceedings and the proceedings for interim measures. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Omnicare Inc. shall pay the costs incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) in the course of the present proceedings and the proceedings for interim measures.

| 3. | Omnicare Inc. and Astellas Pharma GmbH shall each bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Omnicare Inc. and Astellas Pharma GmbH shall each bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 25, 28.1.2012.

1

---
Editorial Note on Part 12
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 12 appear at 69 FR 32438, June 10, 2004.

§ 12.11 Reporting modifications of the project or project works. ( a ) *Reporting requirement.* Regardless of whether a particular modification is permitted without specific prior Commission approval, an applicant or licensee must report any modification of the project or project works to the Regional Engineer in writing, verified in accordance with § 12.13, at the time specified in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) *Time of reporting.* ( 1 ) Any modification that is an emergency measure taken in response to a condition affecting the safety of the project or project works must be submitted with the report of that condition required by § 12.10(a)(2).
( 2 ) In all other instances, the modification must be reported at least 60 days before work on the modification begins.