alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 649 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 649

 To require the Secretary of Energy to obtain the consent of affected 
   State and local governments before making an expenditure from the 
   Nuclear Waste Fund for a nuclear waste repository, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 5, 2019

 Ms. Cortez Masto (for herself and Ms. Rosen) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 
                            and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Secretary of Energy to obtain the consent of affected 
   State and local governments before making an expenditure from the 
   Nuclear Waste Fund for a nuclear waste repository, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Nuclear Waste Informed Consent 
Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act, the terms ``affected Indian tribe'', ``affected unit 
of local government'', ``high-level radioactive waste'', 
``repository'', ``Secretary'', ``spent nuclear fuel'', and ``unit of 
general local government'' have the meanings given the terms in section 
2 of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 (42 U.S.C. 10101).

SEC. 3. CONSENT BASED APPROVAL.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may not make an expenditure from the 
Nuclear Waste Fund established under section 302(c) of the Nuclear 
Waste Policy Act of 1982 (42 U.S.C. 10222(c)) for the costs of the 
activities described in paragraphs (4) and (5) of section 302(d) of 
that Act (42 U.S.C. 10222(d)) unless the Secretary has entered into an 
agreement for a repository with--
            (1) the Governor of the State in which the repository is 
        proposed to be located;
            (2) each affected unit of local government;
            (3) any unit of general local government contiguous to the 
        affected unit of local government if spent nuclear fuel or 
        high-level radioactive waste will be transported through that 
        unit of general local government for disposal at the 
        repository; and
            (4) each affected Indian tribe.
    (b) Conditions on Agreement.--Any agreement for a repository under 
this Act--
            (1) shall be in writing and signed by all parties;
            (2) shall be binding on the parties; and
            (3) shall not be amended or revoked except by mutual 
        agreement of the parties.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2012151DE.01003401.xml

| 26.5.2012 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | C 151/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2012

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

C 151/34

---

Berichtigung der Amtsblattmitteilung in der Rechtssache C-227/11

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 126 vom 28. April 2012
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 126 vom 28. April 2012

2012/C 151/60

Der Wortlaut der Amtsblattmitteilung in der Rechtssache C-227/11, DHL Danzas Air & Ocean, wird durch folgenden Wortlaut ersetzt:

Beschluss des Gerichtshofs (Sechste Kammer) vom 19. Januar 2012 (Vorabentscheidungsersuchen der Rechtbank Haarlem — Niederlande) — DHL Danzas Air & Ocean (Netherlands) BV/Inspecteur van de Belastingsdienst/Douane West, kantoor Hoofddorp Saturnusstraat

(Rechtssache C-227/11) (1)

(Art. 104 § 3 der Verfahrensordnung - Gemeinsamer Zolltarif - Tarifpositionen - Netzwerkanalysatoren - Einreihung - Rechtliche Bedeutung eines Tarifavis der Weltzollorganisation)

2012/C 151/60

Verfahrenssprache: Niederländisch

Vorlegendes Gericht

Rechtbank Haarlem

Parteien des Ausgangsverfahrens

Klägerin: DHL Danzas Air & Ocean (Netherlands) BV

Beklagter: Inspecteur van de Belastingsdienst/Douane West, kantoor Hoofddorp Saturnusstraat

Gegenstand

Vorabentscheidungsersuchen — Rechtbank Haarlem — Gültigkeit der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 129/2005 der Kommission vom 20. Januar 2005 zur Einreihung von bestimmten Waren in die Kombinierte Nomenklatur und zur Änderung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 955/98 (ABl. L 25, S. 37) — Netzwerkanalysatoren

Tenor

Die Kombinierte Nomenklatur in Anhang I der Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 2658/87 des Rates vom 23. Juli 1987 über die zolltarifliche und statistische Nomenklatur sowie den Gemeinsamen Zolltarif in der durch die Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1810/2004 der Kommission vom 7. September 2004 bzw. die Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1719/2005 der Kommission vom 27. Oktober 2005 geänderten Fassung ist dahin auszulegen, dass Netzwerkanalysatoren wie die im Ausgangsverfahren in Rede stehenden, je nach dem Zeitpunkt ihrer Einfuhr, in die Unterposition 9030 40 90 der Kombinierten Nomenklatur in der Fassung der Verordnung Nr. 1810/2004 oder in die Unterposition 9030 40 00 der Kombinierten Nomenklatur in der Fassung der Verordnung Nr. 1719/2005 eingereiht werden können, sofern diese Geräte selbst zum Messen oder Prüfen elektrischer Größen bestimmt sind, was das nationale Gericht zu prüfen hat. Andernfalls sind diese Geräte, je nach dem Zeitpunkt ihrer Einfuhr, in die Unterposition 9031 80 39 der Kombinierten Nomenklatur in der Fassung der Verordnung Nr. 1810/2004 oder in die Unterposition 9031 80 38 der Kombinierten Nomenklatur in der Fassung der Verordnung Nr. 1719/2005 einzureihen.

---

(1)  ABl. C 226 vom 30.7.2011.

1

---
#### § 154.600 Compliance with other subparts.

Any proposal to implement a tariff change other than in rate level must comply with subparts A, B, and C of this part.
Regulatory Evaluation Docket No. FAA-;lot5 -:;?C. I Directorate Identifier: Jfyou make changes to the values in the tahle below, you nur,.,·t ens wethe totals update accordingly. fl they do not. click (or Tab) into and then out qfthe c!umgcd cell. I Co'"' Action1 **Co'''.~'**

' (e.g., Inspection, Labor Part' Co't Total Co''' **T~ta:co"** replacement) (include cost (labor+ u.s. for U.S. Fleet Do not include on- **=~ ~~~~;/h** 

parts) condition costs here

;"' ''" '$322
!!'I'"" 14

I ';!•')OS ""' ' '.•!' "'

!\ ' '!{! **~**

I ' !)! J " ·.>11

' ) '()!)...! " ""'

' -.(If}

' ·l_;l;) " ) :;\1

'

! '"'"

''"' ' (i',)q

';",,,

I .·'"'o "-, ll iiL

·' !!(!!!

;·! )"" ' '()\)
o on ;,/
' !;I; '.,"·"'

;,"·"'' • s"'"' ' li II!;

:-; n _no

; u .no ' "(!(!

' () (li)

.,! ' '" ! 1r: n ·''"" ,,.,

!! o.OO 1 •. ",,,,

,," 1)0

0 0•! ' '"'"

' {)"''

' • n.o • '! "·'"

' "·""

; r: n() I ,,"'"' **~**' ..""

• ;r:en •. <"! I .,". ""
' I; •.:nr;

I i' 'OJ \ I] ;;,, '•'"'" " " '"" I I I!!J; .i

' .,11!1

'\ ...,,, ' ''"'

' 1 !)0 I
:,; I ,.f)() **~**Total Costs of

;in ·U.S. fleet $2,988 Costs·
I under

$ Co''" ActionLabm co't Parts Cost

( 'P (e.g., Inspection,(include access, (@$85/hour) testing, and close- replacement) .up)
'I 0 ;r:

•' no; ''""

' ! _(jl i ' '""

,,'J il(} 'I ' "' '

" ;! !){; Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):• Executive Order 12866: Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"?:-. YES* 0 NO[><] *Explanation: DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: Is the AD significant? • YES* 0 NO[><] *Explanation: Regulatory Flexibility Act: Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for either a Yes or No answer .• YES 0 NO[><] Explanation: Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode oftransportation? **'~;** YES* D NO[><] *Explanation:
# C_2010288EN.01004801.xml

| 23.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/48

---

Action brought on 20 August 2010 — CTG Luxembourg PSF v Court of Justice

(Case T-340/10)

()

(2010/C 288/91)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Computer Task Group PSF SA Luxembourg (Bertrange, Luxembourg) (represented by: M. Thewes, lawyer)

Defendants: Court of Justice of the European Union

Form of order sought

| — | order the joining of the present case with the case pending before the Eighth Chamber of the General Court under Case T-170/10; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the joining of the present case with the case pending before the Eighth Chamber of the General Court under Case T-170/10;

| — | annul the decision the Court of Justice of 29 June 2010 to award the contract ‘AO 008/2009: 1st and 2nd level support for the users of IT and telephone systems, call centre, end user hardware management’ to another tenderer; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision the Court of Justice of 29 June 2010 to award the contract ‘AO 008/2009: 1st and 2nd level support for the users of IT and telephone systems, call centre, end user hardware management’ to another tenderer;

| — | declare the non-contractual liability of the European Union and order the Court of Justice to compensate the applicant for all the loss incurred on account of the contested decisions and appoint an expert to evaluate that loss; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the non-contractual liability of the European Union and order the Court of Justice to compensate the applicant for all the loss incurred on account of the contested decisions and appoint an expert to evaluate that loss;

| — | order the Court of Justice to pay all the costs and expenses. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Court of Justice to pay all the costs and expenses.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and arguments put froward by the applicant are identical to those put forward in Case T-170/10 CTG Luxembourg PSF v Court of Justice (1) concerning the same tendering procedure.

---

(1)  OJ 2010 C 161, p. 48.

---
§ 381.519 Enforcement authority. ( a ) To facilitate oversight and enforcement of this subpart, selected establishments operating under a cooperative interstate shipment program must, upon request, give the FSIS selected establishment coordinator or other FSIS officials access to all establishment records required under the Act and the implementing regulations in this chapter. The Administrator may deselect any selected establishment that refuses to comply with this paragraph.
( b ) Selected establishment coordinators may initiate any appropriate enforcement action provided for in part 500 of this chapter if they determine that a selected establishment under their jurisdiction is operating in manner that is inconsistent with the Act and the implementing regulations in this chapter. Selected establishments participating in a cooperative interstate shipment program are subject to the notification and appeal procedures set out in part 500 of this chapter.
( c ) If inspection at a selected establishment is suspended for any of the reasons specified in § 500.3 or § 500.4 of this chapter, FSIS will: ( 1 ) Provide an opportunity for the establishment to implement corrective actions and remain in the cooperative interstate shipment program, or
( 2 ) Move to deselect the establishment as provided in § 381.520 of this subpart.
( d ) The decision to deselect a selected establishment under a suspension will be made on a case-by-case basis. In making this decision, FSIS, in consultation with the State where the selected establishment is located, will consider, among other factors: ( 1 ) The non-compliance that led to the suspension;
( 2 ) The selected establishment's compliance history; and
( 3 ) The corrective actions proposed by the selected establishment.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1359 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1359

  To amend chapter 51 of title 49, United States Code, to extend the 
    coverage of the rules governing the transportation of hazardous 
                   materials, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 13 (legislative day, July 12), 1999

 Mr. Hollings introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend chapter 51 of title 49, United States Code, to extend the 
    coverage of the rules governing the transportation of hazardous 
                   materials, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Postal Hazardous Materials Safety 
Enhancement Act''.

SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF HAZMAT REQUIREMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 5102(9)(B) of title 49, United States 
Code, is amended to read as follows:
                    ``(B) for purposes of sections 5123 and 5124 of 
                this title, does not include a department, agency, or 
                instrumentality of the Government.''.
    (b) Coordination.--In carrying out the provisions of chapter 51 of 
title 49, United States Code, the Secretary of Transportation shall 
consult with the Postmaster General in order to coordinate, to the 
greatest extent feasible, the enforcement of that chapter.

SEC. 3. TRANSPORTATION OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS VIA THE UNITED STATES 
              MAIL.

    (a) In General.--Section 5102 of title 49, United States Code, is 
amended by--
            (1) redesignating paragraph (13) as paragraph (14); and
            (2) inserting after paragraph (12) the following:
            ``(13) `transportation of hazardous material in commerce' 
        and `transporting hazardous material in commerce' include the 
        transportation of hazardous material in the United States 
        mail.''.
    (b) Repeal of Exception.--Section 5126(b) of such title is amended 
to read as follows:
    ``(b) Nonapplication.--This chapter does not apply to a pipeline 
subject to regulation under chapter 601 of this title.''.
                                 <all>
```
SET THEM UP FOR SUCCESS IN AND OUT 

OF THE CLASSROOM.

Support kids’ overall health and wellness by being informed.

It’s important to talk with kids about the risks of underage drinking and 

substance use from a young age, and continue those conversations as 

they get older and become more independent. For tips on how—and 

when—to begin the conversation, visit 

www.underagedrinking.samhsa.gov

#TalkTheyHearYou PEP20-03-01-040
Editorial Note on Part 284
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 284 appear at 65 FR 10222, Feb. 25, 2000.

§ 284.2 Refunds and interest. ( a ) *Refunds.* Any rate or charge collected for any sale, transportation, or assignment conducted pursuant to this part which exceeds the rates or charges authorized by this part shall be refunded.
( b ) *Interest.* All refunds made pursuant to this section must include interest at an amount determined in accordance with § 154.501(d) of this chapter.
[44 FR 52184, Sept. 7, 1979, as amended at 44 FR 53505, Sept. 14, 1979; Order 273, 48 FR 1288, Jan. 12, 1983; Order 581, 60 FR 53072, Oct. 11, 1995]
Exhibit 32.2


                              CERTIFICATION OF THE
              EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                             PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection   with  the  Quarterly   Report  of  KeySpan   Corporation   (the
"Corporation")  for the  quarter  ended  September  30,  2004 as filed  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Gerald
Luterman,   Executive  Vice  President  and  Chief  Financial   Officer  of  the
Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                           /s/ Gerald Luterman
                                           -------------------
                                           Name: Gerald Luterman
                                           Title: Executive Vice President and
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
                                           Date: November 4, 2004
§ 154.202 Filings to initiate a new rate schedule. ( a ) When the filing is to initiate a new service authorized under a blanket authority in part 284 of this chapter, the filing must comply with the requirements of this paragraph. ( 1 ) Filings under this paragraph must: ( i ) Adhere to the requirements of subparts A, B, and C of this part;
( ii ) Contain a description of the new service, including, but not limited to, the proposed effective date for commencement of service, applicability, whether the service is interruptible or firm, and the necessity for the service;
( iii ) Explain how the new service will differ from existing services, including a concise description of the natural gas company's existing operations;
( iv ) Explain the impact of the new service on existing firm and interruptible customers, including but not limited to: ( A ) The adequacy of existing capacity, if the proposed service is a firm service, and
( B ) The effect on receipt and delivery point flexibility, nominating and scheduling priorities, allocation of capacity, operating conditions, and curtailment, for any new service;
( v ) Include workpapers that detail the computations underlying the proposed rate under the new rate schedule; or, if the rate is a currently effective rate, include the appropriate reference and an explanation of why the rate is appropriate;
( vi ) Give a justification, similar in form to filed testimony in a general section 4 rate case, explaining why the proposed rate design and proposed allocation of costs are just and reasonable;
( vii ) If the costs relating to existing services are reallocated to new services, explain the method for allocating the costs and the impact on the existing customers;
( viii ) Include workpapers showing the estimated effect on revenue and costs over the twelve-month period commencing on the proposed effective date of the filing.
( ix ) List other filings pending before the Commission at the time of the filing which may significantly affect the filing. Explain how the instant filing would be affected by the outcome of each related pending filing;
( 2 ) Any interdependent filings must be filed concurrently and contain a notice of the interdependence.
( b ) If a new service, facility, or rate is specifically authorized by a Commission order pursuant to section 7 of the Natural Gas Act, with the filing of tariff sheets or sections to implement the new rate schedule, the natural gas company must: ( 1 ) Comply with the requirements of § 154.203; and
( 2 ) Where the rate or charge proposed differs from the rate or charge approved in the certificate order, the natural gas company must: Show that the change is due to a rate adjustment under a periodic rate change mechanism previously accepted under § 154.403 which has taken effect since the certificate order was issued; or, show that the rate change is in accordance with the terms of the certificate, and provide workpapers justifying the change.
[Order 582, 60 FR 52996, Oct. 11, 1995, as amended by Order 714, 73 FR 57535, Oct. 3, 2008]
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Crescent Moon, Inc., on Form
10-QSB for the  period  ending May 31,  2004 as filed  with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  Robert
Denome,  Principal  Executive  and  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Date: October 1, 2004
      ---------------------

 /s/ Robert P. Denome
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert P. Denome
President, Principal Executive and Financial Officer


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 1309.4 What programs or activities are covered by the Act and this part? ( a ) The Act and this part apply to any program or activity receiving financial assistance from TVA.
( b ) The Act and this part do not apply to: ( 1 ) An age distinction contained in that part of a Federal, State or local statute or ordinance adopted by an elected, general purpose legislative body which: ( i ) Provides any benefits or assistance to persons based on age; or
( ii ) Establishes criteria for participation in age-related terms; or
( iii ) Describes intended beneficiaries or target groups in age-related terms.
( 2 ) Any employment practice of any employer, employment agency, labor organization, or any labor-management joint apprenticeship training program.