alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 343.5 Required negotiations.

The Commission or other decisional authority may require parties to enter into good faith negotiations to settle oil pipeline rate matters. The Commission will refer all protested rate filings to a settlement judge pursuant to § 385.603 of this chapter for recommended resolution. Failure to participate in such negotiations in good faith is a ground for decision against the party so failing to participate on any issue that is the subject of negotiation by other parties.

[Order 578, 60 FR 19505, Apr. 19, 1995]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6616

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JAMAL ANTWAN MOON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CR-99-203, CA-01-432) Submitted: July 19, 2002 Decided: September 20, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jamal Antwan Moon, Appellant Pro Se. Darryl James Mitchell, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Jamal Antwan Moon seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2002). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant the motion for enlargement of the record, deny the motion for leave to take deposition, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Moon , Nos. CR-99-203; CA-01-432 (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 15, 2002, entered Jan. 16, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2010148EN.01004301.xml

| 5.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/43

---

Action brought on 26 March 2010 — Telefónica O2 Germany v OHIM — Loopia (LOOPIA)

(Case T-150/10)

2010/C 148/71

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Telefónica O2 Germany GmbH & Co. OHG (Munich, Germany) (represented by: A. Fottner and M. Müller, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Loopia AB (Västeras, Sweden)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 12 January 2010 in case R 1812/2008-1; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 12 January 2010 in case R 1812/2008-1; and

| — | Order the defendant to bear the costs, including those related to the appeal proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to bear the costs, including those related to the appeal proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark “LOOPIA”, for services in class 42

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited: German trade mark registrations of the word mark “LOOP”, for goods and services in classes 9, 38 an 42; Community trade mark registration of the word mark “LOOP”, for goods and services in classes 9, 16, 35, 38 ad 42; Community trade mark registration of the word mark “LOOPY”, for goods and services in classes 9, 38 and 42

Mark or sign cited:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition for all the contested goods

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulled the contested decision, rejected the opposition and allowed the application

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009 as the Board of Appeal wrongly found that there was no likelihood of confusion between the trade marks concerned.

Pleas in law:

---
#### § 1315.210 Reporting.

No reporting is required with respect to payments of reasonable compensation made to regularly employed officers or employees of a person.
### §4913. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 100–418, title V, §5413, Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1467, required the Secretary to submit to committees of Congress, not more than 1 year after Aug. 23, 1988, a report describing actions taken pursuant to this chapter, and to submit to committees of Congress, not more than 3 years after Aug. 23, 1988, a report assessing the current quality and comprehensiveness of, and the ability of the public and of private entities to obtain access to trade data, describing all other actions taken and planned to be taken pursuant to this chapter, including comments by the private sector and by State agencies that promote exports on the implementation of the Data Bank, describing the extent to which the systems within the Data Bank are being used and any recommendations with regard to the operation of the system, and describing the extent to which United States citizens and firms have access to the data banks of foreign countries that is similar to the access provided to foreign citizens and firms.
CERTIFICATION
OF
 CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  In
connection with this Quarterly Report of Mega
Media Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period
ending April 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gennady
Pomeranets, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
  1. Such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 30, 2008, fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2. The
information contained in such Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the
period ending April 30, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Mega Media Group,
Inc.
  By:
                /s/Gennady
      PomeranetsGENNADY
      POMERANETSChief Financial
      Officer,Date:
                June
      21, 2008
### §5412. Repealed. Pub. L. 106–34, §10, June 8, 1999, 113 Stat. 123

Section, Pub. L. 101–592, §13, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 2952; Pub. L. 104–113, §11(i), Mar. 7, 1996, 110 Stat. 782, required the Secretary to issue regulations necessary to implement chapter.
# C_2012080EN.01001801.xml

| 17.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 80/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 80/18

---

Judgment of the General Court of 2 February 2012 — Almunia Textil v OHIM — FIBA-Europe (EuroBasket)

(Case T-596/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark EuroBasket - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2012/C 80/29

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Almunia Textil, SA (La Almunia de Doña Godina, Spain) (represented by: J.E. Astiz Suárez, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: R. Manea, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: FIBA-Europe eV (Munich, Germany) (represented by: T. Hogh Holub, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 6 October 2010 (Case R 280/2010-1) concerning opposition proceedings between Almunia Textil, SA and FIBA-Europe eV.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Almunia Textil, SA to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) and FIBA-Europe eV including, in respect of the latter, the unavoidable costs incurred for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Almunia Textil, SA to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) and FIBA-Europe eV including, in respect of the latter, the unavoidable costs incurred for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.

---

(1)  OJ C 80, 12.3.2011.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7324

In Re: NATHANIEL BRANDT ROBINSON,

Petitioner.

On Petition For Writ of Mandamus. (CA-04-462)

Submitted: December 12, 2005 Decided: December 30, 2005

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nathaniel Brandt Robinson, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Nathaniel Brandt Robinson petitions for writ of mandamus.

He seeks an order compelling the Clerk of the United States Supreme

Court to accept his petition for writ of certiorari as timely

filed.

Mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has

a clear right to the relief sought. See In re First Fed. Sav. &

Loan Ass’n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). “Mandamus ‘has

traditionally been used in the federal courts only to confine an

inferior court to a lawful exercise of its prescribed jurisdiction

or to compel it to exercise its authority when it is its duty to do

so.’” United States v. Moussaoui, 333 F.3d 509, 516 (4th Cir.

2003) (quoting Will v. United States, 389 U.S. 90, 95 (1967)).

Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. In re United

Steelworkers, 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir. 1979). Further, mandamus

is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary

circumstances. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394,

402 (1976); In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987).

The relief sought by Robinson is not available by way of

mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma

pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
**Exhibit 31.2****Chief Financial Officer Certification**I, Robert Giambrone, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 of KBW, Inc. (the “Registrant”);2. Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) [Intentionally omitted.]  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of theRegistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in theRegistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theRegistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.   Date: August 13, 2007     /s/ ROBERT GIAMBRONE Robert Giambrone  Chief Financial Officer
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 721 

To prohibit the Secretary of Energy from taking any action relating to 

the licensing, planning, development, or construction of a nuclear waste 

repository until the Director of the Office of Management and Budget 

submits to Congress a study on the economic viability and job-creating 

benefits of alternative uses of the Yucca Mountain site, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 7, 2019 

Ms. ROSEN (for herself and Ms. CORTEZ MASTO) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Secretary of Energy from taking any action 

relating to the licensing, planning, development, or construction of a nuclear waste repository until the Director 

of the Office of Management and Budget submits to 

Congress a study on the economic viability and jobcreating benefits of alternative uses of the Yucca Mountain site, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 721 IS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Jobs, Not Waste Act 

3 of 2019’’. 

4 SEC. 2. STUDYING THE ECONOMIC BENEFIT OF ALTER5 NATIVE USES OF YUCCA MOUNTAIN SITE. 

6 (a) DEFINITION OF YUCCA MOUNTAIN SITE.—In this 

7 Act, the term ‘‘Yucca Mountain site’’ has the meaning 

8 given the term in section 2 of the Nuclear Waste Policy 

9 Act of 1982 (42 U.S.C. 10101). 

10 (b) STUDY; HEARINGS.—The Secretary of Energy 

11 may not take any action relating to the licensing, plan12 ning, development, or construction of a nuclear waste re13 pository at the Yucca Mountain site until— 

14 (1) the Director of the Office of Management 

15 and Budget submits to Congress, and makes avail16 able to the public, a study on the economic viability 

17 and job-creating benefits of alternative uses of the 

18 Yucca Mountain site as described in the report of 

19 the Government Accountability Office numbered 

20 GAO–11–847 and dated September 2011, includ21 ing— 

22 (A) defense activities, such as a command 

23 facility for unmanned aircraft systems; 

24 (B) a secure electronic data center; 

25 (C) the development of renewable energy 

26 sources; and 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 721 IS

1 (D) scientific research; and 

2 (2) each of the appropriate committees of Con3 gress holds a hearing on the alternative uses of the 

4 Yucca Mountain site described in subparagraphs (A) 

5 through (D) of paragraph (1). 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 46 (Wednesday, March 9, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12978-12979]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5334]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Resources and Services Administration


Statement of Delegation of Authority

    Notice is hereby given that I have delegated to the Administrator, 
Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), and the Director, 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), with authority to 
redelegate, the authority vested in the Secretary under Title XI, Part 
A, Section 1114, titled ``Interagency Coordinating Committee on Newborn 
and Child Screening (Committee),'' of the Public Health Service Act as 
amended, which was added by the Newborn Screening Saves Lives Act of 
2008, Public Law 110-237, as amended, to serve as co-chairs of the 
Committee, and to select additional nonvoting Federal liaisons, as 
appropriate.
    I hereby delegate to Administrator, HRSA, and Director, CDC, the 
authority vested in the Secretary under Title XI, Part A, Section 1110, 
titled ``Evaluating the Effectiveness of Newborn and Child Screening 
Programs,'' of the Public Health Service Act, as amended. This 
authority may be redelegated.
    This delegation excludes the authority to issue regulations, to 
submit reports to Congress, to establish advisory committees and 
councils, and appoint their members, and shall be exercised in 
accordance with the Department's

[[Page 12979]]

applicable policies, procedures, and guidelines.
    I hereby affirm and ratify any actions taken by the Administrator, 
HRSA, the Director, CDC, or other HRSA and CDC officials, which involve 
the exercise of these authorities prior to the effective date of this 
delegation.
    This delegation is effective upon date of signature.

    Dated: March 2, 2011.
Kathleen Sebelius,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-5334 Filed 3-8-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165-15-P
#### §§ 381.464-381.468 [Reserved]
### §1022e. Inflation

#### (a) Methods and requirements for achieving price stability

The Congress determines that the objective of achieving reasonable price stability as soon as feasible, as set forth in section 1022(a)(3) of this title and section 1022a(a) of this title, shall be pursued by the methods and subject to the requirements of section 1022b(b) of this title.

#### (b) Coordination of fiscal or monetary policies with specific targeted policies

The Congress finds that sole dependence upon fiscal or monetary policies or both to combat inflation can exacerbate both inflation and unemployment. The Congress finds that the coordinated use of fiscal and monetary policies in conjunction with specific targeted policies are necessary to combat inflation.

#### (c) Policy initiation and recommendations; elements of structural policies

The President shall initiate specific policies to reduce the rate of inflation, including recommendations to the Congress where necessary, and include recommendations within the Economic Report and the President's budget to the extent practicable. Structural policies to reduce the rate of inflation may include—

(1) an effective information system to monitor and analyze inflationary trends in individual economic sectors, so that the President and Congress can be alerted to developing inflation problems especially those caused by bottlenecks inhibiting the flow of goods and services;

(2) programs and policies for alleviating shortages of goods, services, labor, and capital, with particular emphasis on food, energy, and critical industrial materials to aid in stabilizing prices;

(3) the establishment of stockpiles of agricultural commodities and other critical materials to help stabilize prices, meet emergency needs, and promote adequate income to producers;

(4) encouragement to labor and management to increase productivity within the national framework of full employment through voluntary arrangements in industries and economic sectors;

(5) recommendations to increase competition in the private sector and to improve the economic climate for the creation and growth of smaller businesses, including recommendations to strengthen and enforce the antitrust laws, the patent laws, and the internal revenue laws and regulations;

(6) removal or proper modification of such Government restrictions and regulations as added unnecessarily to inflationary costs;

(7) increasing exports and improving the international competitive position of agriculture, business, and industry; and

(8) such other administrative actions and recommendations for legislation as the President deems desirable, to promote reasonable price stability.

(Feb. 20, 1946, ch. 33, §8, as added Pub. L. 95–523, title I, §109, Oct. 27, 1978, 92 Stat. 1898.)
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23


The Board of Directors
Foilmark, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-90281 and 333-90283) on Form S-8 of Foilmark, Inc. of our report dated
August 30, 2000, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Foilmark,
Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2000 and 1999, and the related
consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders' equity and cash flows for
the year ended June 30, 2000, the six months ended June 30, 1999 and the year
ended December 31, 1998 and related schedule, which report appears in the
June 30, 2000 annual report on Form 10-K of Foilmark, Inc.



                                       KPMG LLP


Melville, New York
September 29, 2000
§ 37.43 Physical security of DMV production facilities. ( a ) States must ensure the physical security of facilities where driver's licenses and identification cards are produced, and the security of document materials and papers from which driver's licenses and identification cards are produced or manufactured.
( b ) States must describe the security of DMV facilities as part of their security plan, in accordance with § 37.41.
#### § 32.4 Filing procedure.

All applications under Part 32 must be filed with the Secretary of the Commission in accordance with filing procedures posted on the Commission's Web site at *http://www.ferc.gov.*

[Order 737, 75 FR 43403, July 26, 2010]
### §§5621 to 5625. Repealed. Pub. L. 111–314, §6, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3444

Section 5621, Pub. L. 102–555, title II, §201, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4171; Pub. L. 105–303, title I, §107(f)(1), Oct. 28, 1998, 112 Stat. 2854, related to general licensing authority. See section 60121 of Title 51, National and Commercial Space Programs.

Section 5622, Pub. L. 102–555, title II, §202, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4172; Pub. L. 105–303, title I, §107(f)(2), Oct. 28, 1998, 112 Stat. 2854, related to conditions for operation. See section 60122 of Title 51.

Section 5623, Pub. L. 102–555, title II, §203, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4172, related to administrative authority of Secretary. See section 60123 of Title 51.

Section 5624, Pub. L. 102–555, title II, §204, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4173, related to regulatory authority of Secretary. See section 60124 of Title 51.

Section 5625, Pub. L. 102–555, title II, §205, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4173, related to agency activities. See section 60125 of Title 51.