alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2012 - 025 0 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 1 - CE - 0 43 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: 

### 2012 - 00001 **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s , list latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the co mments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following: If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following:

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.:

**ASE** Printed Name **:** 

### G. Keith Noles **Date**

**Branch Manager Date**
#### §§ 317.303-317.307 [Reserved]
§ 1312.19 Report. ( a ) Each Federal land manager, when requested by the Secretary of the Interior, will submit such information as is necessary to enable the Secretary to comply with section 13 of the Act and comprehensively report on activities carried out under provisions of the Act.
( b ) The Secretary of the Interior will include in the annual comprehensive report, submitted to the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs of the United States House of Representatives and to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the United States Senate under section 13 of the Act, information on public awareness programs submitted by each Federal land manager under § 1312.20(b). Such submittal will fulfill the Federal land manager's responsibility under section 10(c) of the Act to report on public awareness programs.
( c ) The comprehensive report by the Secretary of the Interior also will include information on the activities carried out under section 14 of the Act. Each Federal land manager, when requested by the Secretary, will submit any available information on surveys and schedules and suspected violations in order to enable the Secretary to summarize in the comprehensive report actions taken pursuant to section 14 of the Act.
[60 FR 5259, 5261, Jan. 26, 1995]
### §714l. Interest of Members of Congress

The provisions of section 6306(a) of title 41 shall apply to all contracts or agreements of the Corporation, except contracts or agreements of a kind which the Corporation may enter into with farmers participating in a program of the Corporation.

(June 29, 1948, ch. 704, §14, 62 Stat. 1074.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

In text, "section 6306(a) of title 41" substituted for "section 1 of the Act of February 27, 1877, as amended (41 U.S.C., 1940 edition, 22)" on authority of Pub. L. 111–350, §6(c), Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3854, which Act enacted Title 41, Public Contracts.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Exceptions From Transfer of Functions

For exception of functions of corporations of Department of Agriculture from transfer of functions to Secretary of Agriculture by Reorg. Plan No. 2 of 1953, see Exceptions From Transfer of Functions note set out under section 712a of this title.
EXHIBIT 23.1

               Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants


We have issued our report dated December 16, 2002, accompanying the consolidated
financial  statements included in the Annual Report of Advanced  Nutraceuticals,
Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended  September 30, 2002.  We hereby  consent to
the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration  Statement for
Advanced   Nutraceuticals,   Inc.   (the   successor  to   Nutrition   For  Life
International,  Inc.) on Form S-8  (File No.  33-99366,  effective  December  5,
1995).

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
----------------------
Grant Thornton LLP
Houston, Texas
December 16, 2002
#### § 27.1 The Board.

The Government Accountability Office Personnel Appeals Board, hereinafter the Board, is composed of five members appointed by the Comptroller General, in accordance with the provisions of 31 U.S.C. 751. For purposes of the regulations in this part and 4 CFR part 28, a simple majority of the Board shall constitute a quorum and a majority of a quorum may act for the Board. The Board may designate a panel of its members or an individual Board member to take any action within the scope of the Board's authority, subject to later review by the Board.

[64 FR 15125, Mar. 30, 1999, as amended at 68 FR 69297, Dec. 12, 2003]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Andre N. Honeycutt, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 731]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Mario J. Rossetti, A.J.), rendered March 16, 2005. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed *(see People v Hidalgo,*91 NY2d 733, 737 [1998]). Present—Scudder, J.P., Kehoe, Martoche and Green, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 693 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.693

                     One Hundred Sixteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and nineteen

                                 An Act

 
To amend title 36, United States Code, to require that the POW/MIA flag 
be displayed on all days that the flag of the United States is displayed 
                      on certain Federal property.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``National POW/MIA Flag Act''.
SEC. 2. DAYS ON WHICH THE POW/MIA FLAG IS DISPLAYED ON CERTAIN FEDERAL 
PROPERTY.
    Section 902 of title 36, United States Code, is amended by striking 
subsection (c) and inserting the following:
    ``(c) Days for Flag Display.--For the purposes of this section, 
POW/MIA flag display days are all days on which the flag of the United 
States is displayed.''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
### M A N D A T E

TO THE 252ND DISTRICT COURT of JEFFERSON COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth District of Texas, on the 17th day of April,

2014, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

RANDY JAMES LEWIS JR., Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS Appellee.

CAUSE NO. 13-13-00056-CR (Tr.Ct.No. 11-11140)

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal,

concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court orders

the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

      

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals

for the Thirteenth District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Rogelio Valdez, Chief Justice of our Court of Appeals, with the seal

thereof affixed, at the City of Edinburg, Texas this 30th day of December, 2014.

Dorian E. Ramirez, CLERK
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-11207

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff−Appellee,

versus

MANUEL SALAS-PEREZ,

Defendant−Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

No. 3:17-CR-94-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Manuel Salas-Perez

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 18, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-11207 Document: 00514922166 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/18/2019
No. 18-11207

2

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Salas-Perez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the 

relevant portions of the record. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the 

appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 18-11207 Document: 00514922166 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/18/2019
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Dana S. Philbrook, hereby certify that: 

 

(1)    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Service Bancorp, Inc.; 

 

(2)    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

 

(3)    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport; 

 

(4)    The small business issuer’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and we have: 

 

a)    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c)    Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

(5)    The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons fulfilling theequivalent functions): 

 

a)    Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

 

b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

 

/s/ DANA S.PHILBROOK                                        

Dana S. Philbrook 

Chief Financial Officer 

February 13, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2004 (the "Report") for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange
Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

Gregory T.
Schiffman, the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Affymetrix, Inc. certifies that, to the best of such officer's knowledge:



|March 16, 2005 |  | /s/GREGORY T. SCHIFFMAN
|-------------- |  | -----------------------
|               |  | Name:                  
|               |  | Title:                 

---



QuickLinks
# C_2013225EN.01001602.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/16

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 16 May 2013 — European Commission v Ryanair Ltd

(Case C-615/11 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Action for failure to act - Article 232 EC - Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 - Article 20(2) - State aid allegedly granted to Italian airlines - Complaint - Lack of a decision from the Commission)

2013/C 225/26

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, D. Grespan and S. Noë, acting as Agents)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Ryanair Ltd (represented by: E. Vahida, avocat, and I.-G. Metaxas-Maragkidis, dikigoros), Air One SpA (represented by: M. Merola, M.C. Santacroce and G. Belotti, avvocati)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 29 September 2011 in Case T-442/07 Ryanair v Commission upholding in part an action for failure to act seeking a finding that the Commission had unlawfully failed to adopt a decision on Ryanair’s complaints concerning aid allegedly granted by Italy to Alitalia, Air One and Meridiana in the form of various measures granting advantages to those companies

Ryanair

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 65, 3.3.2012.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM INSURANCE
MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       4,346,617
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,618,579
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,441,408
<PP&E>                                      15,813,954
<DEPRECIATION>                              (8,372,978)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              39,254,696
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,365,909
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       128,002
<OTHER-SE>                                  32,836,618
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                39,254,696
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,687,559
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,997,588
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,421
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (260,400)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (39,900)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (220,500)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.02)


</TABLE>
# C_2013225EN.01002102.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/21

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 May 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — France) — Doux Élevage SNC, Coopérative agricole UKL-ARREE v Ministère de l’Agriculture, de l’Alimentation, de la Pêche, de la Ruralité et de l’Aménagement du territoire, Comité interprofessionnel de la dinde française (CIDEF)

(Case C-677/11) (1)

1

(Article 107(1) TFEU - State aid - Concept of ‘State resources’ - Concept of ‘imputability to the State’ - Inter-trade organisations in the agricultural sector - Recognised organisations - Common activities decided on by those organisations in the interests of trade - Financing by means of contributions introduced on a voluntary basis by those organisations - Administrative measure making those contributions compulsory for all traders in the agricultural industry affected)

2013/C 225/35

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Doux Élevage SNC, Coopérative agricole UKL-ARREE

Applicants:

Defendants: Ministère de l’Agriculture, de l’Alimentation, de la Pêche, de la Ruralité et de l’Aménagement du territoire, Comité interprofessionnel de la dinde française (CIDEF)

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Conseil d’État — Interpretation of Article 107 TFEU in the light of Case C-354/02 Pearle and Others — Decision by which a national authority extends to all the traders in an industry an agreement which introduces the levying of a contribution in an inter-trade organisation recognised by that authority and renders that contribution compulsory — Implementation of publicity activities, promotional activities, external relations activities, activities in defence of the sector’s interests — Financing of activities which are contrary to EU law — Concept of ‘aid’

Pearle and Others

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 107(1) TFEU must be interpreted as meaning that a decision by which a national authority extends to all traders in an agricultural industry an agreement which, like the inter-trade agreement at issue in the main proceedings, introduces the levying of a contribution in an inter-trade organisation recognised by that national authority, thus rendering that contribution compulsory, in order to make it possible to implement publicity activities, promotional activities, external relations activities, quality assurance activities, research activities and activities in defence of the sector’s interests, does not constitute State aid.

---

(1)  OJ C 89, 24.3.2012.

1

---
Exhibit 20.1

Creation Date Sat Jan  3, 1998  09:37 PM                            Page    1
CMB95B

From: The Chase Manhattan Bank

To:   Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.


                   MONTHLY CERTIFICATEHOLDER'S REPORT
                   ----------------------------------

Due Period 26 Beginning Date                     12/01/1997
Due Period 26 End Date                           12/31/1997
Determination Date                               01/09/1998
Remittance Date                                  01/15/1998


I.    Monthly Principal and Principal Carryover Shortfall to Certificateholders
      (Per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                  $ 19.1416449154

II.   Monthly Interest and Unpaid Interest to Certificateholders
      (Per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                   $ 1.4788547150

III.  Monthly Expenses Summary

      A. Servicing Fee Disbursement                                $ 374,968.17
      B. Cash Collateral Account Expense                                 $ 0.00
      C. Total Expenses paid
         (per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                $ 0.2506533430

IV.   Cash Collateral Account Deposit Amount                             $ 0.00

V.    Outstanding Advance Summary

      A. From Prior Period                                       $ 4,193,746.21
      B. From Current Period                                     $ 4,188,427.41
      C. Change in Amount Between Periods (Lines B - A)             $ -5,318.80

VI.   Pool Factor Information

      A. Certificate Principal Balance                         $ 421,326,606.33
      B. Initial Certificate Balance                         $ 1,495,963,171.74
      C. Pool Factor (Lines A / B)                               0.281642365460

VII.  Available Cash Collateral Account Information for Due Period

      A. Available Cash Collateral Amount                       $ 22,498,090.11
      B. Available Cash Collateral Amount Percentage            5.000000000333%

VIII. Required Cash Collateral Amount

      A. For the Current Collection Period                      $ 22,498,090.11
      B. For the Next Collection Period                         $ 21,066,330.32