54752 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 173 / Friday, September 6, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 

According to BHT’s service 

information, some of the costs of this 

AD may be covered under warranty, 

thereby reducing the cost impact on 

affected individuals. We do not control 

warranty coverage by BHT. Accordingly, 

we have included all costs in our cost 

estimate. 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: 

Aviation Programs, describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: 

‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

helicopters identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

This AD will not have federalism 

implications under Executive Order 

13132. This AD will not have a 

substantial direct effect on the States, on 

the relationship between the national 

government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify that this AD: 

(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866; 

(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 

(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); 

(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation 

in Alaska to the extent that it justifies 

making a regulatory distinction; and 

(4) Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

We prepared an economic evaluation 

of the estimated costs to comply with 

this AD and placed it in the AD docket. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

Adoption of the Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as 

follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding 

the following new airworthiness 

directive (AD): 

2013–18–03 Bell Helicopter Textron 

Canada Inc (BHT): Amendment 39– 

17576; Docket No. FAA–2013–0349; 

Directorate Identifier 2012–SW–058–AD. 

(a) Applicability 

This AD applies to the following 

helicopters, certificated in any category: 

(1) BHT Model 206A and 206B helicopters, 

all serial numbers (S/N) except S/Ns 1, 2, and 

3, with an engine auto-relight kit control box 

assembly (control box assembly) part number 

(P/N) 206–375–017–101 installed; and 

(2) BHT Model 206L helicopters, S/N 

45001 through 45153 and 46601 through 

46617, with a control box assembly P/N 206– 

375–017–103 installed. 

(b) Unsafe Condition 

This AD defines the unsafe condition as an 

inoperative control box assembly. This 

condition could result in a disabled autorelight system, failure of the engine to relight 

after a flame-out, increased pilot workload 

during a power loss emergency, and 

subsequent loss of control of the helicopter. 

(c) Effective Date 

This AD becomes effective October 11, 

2013. 

(d) Compliance 

You are responsible for performing each 

action required by this AD within the 

specified compliance time unless it has 

already been accomplished prior to that time. 

(e) Required Actions 

Within 4 months, replace the control box 

assembly: 

(1) For Model 206A and 206B helicopters, 

replace control box assembly P/N 206–375– 

017–101 with a control box assembly P/N 

206–375–017–105. 

(2) For Model 206L helicopters, replace 

control box assembly P/N 206–375–017–103 

with a control box assembly P/N 206–375– 

017–107. 

(f) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

(1) The Manager, Safety Management 

Group, FAA, may approve AMOCs for this 

AD. Send your proposal to: Rao Edupuganti, 

Aviation Safety Engineer, Regulations and 

Policy Group, Rotorcraft Directorate, FAA, 

2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 

76137; telephone (817) 222–5110; email 

rao.edupuganti@faa.gov. 

(2) For operations conducted under a 14 

CFR part 119 operating certificate or under 

14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that 

you notify your principal inspector, or 

lacking a principal inspector, the manager of 

the local flight standards district office or 

certificate holding district office, before 

operating any aircraft complying with this 

AD through an AMOC. 

(g) Additional Information 

(1) BHT Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) No. 

206–11–127 for Model 206A and 206B 

helicopters and ASB No. 206L–11–167 for 

Model 206L helicopters, both dated May 2, 

2011, which are not incorporated by 

reference, contain additional information 

about the subject of this AD. For service 

information identified in this AD, contact 

Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Limited, 

12,800 Rue de l’Avenir, Mirabel, Quebec 

J7J1R4; telephone (450) 437–2862 or (800) 

363–8023; fax (450) 433–0272; or at http://

www.bellcustomer.com/files/. You may 

review a copy of the service information at 

the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel, 

Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., 

Room 663, Fort Worth, Texas 76137. 

(2) The subject of this AD is addressed in 

Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA) AD 

CF–2012–19, dated June 12, 2012. You may 

view the TCCA AD at http://

www.regulations.gov in Docket No. FAA– 

2013–0349. 

(h) Subject 

Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC) 

Code: 7410: Ignition Power Supply. 

Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on August 21, 

2013. 

Kim Smith, 

Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft 

Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2013–21578 Filed 9–5–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Bureau of Industry and Security 

15 CFR Part 748 

[Docket No. 130826763–3763–01] 

RIN 0694–AF95 

Addition and Revision to the List of 

Validated End-Users in the People’s 

Republic of China 

AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and 

Security, Commerce. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: In this rule, the Bureau of 

Industry and Security (BIS) amends the 

Export Administration Regulations 

(EAR) to add an end-user in the People’s 

Republic of China (PRC) to the list of 

Validated End-Users (VEUs). 

Specifically, BIS amends Supplement 


ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 173 / Friday, September 6, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 54753 

No. 7 to part 748 of the EAR to add Intel 

Semiconductor (Dalian) Ltd. (Intel 

Dalian) as a VEU. With this rule, 

exports, reexports and transfers (incountry) of certain items to two Intel 

Dalian eligible destinations are now 

authorized under Authorization VEU. 

BIS also amends Supplement No. 7 to 

part 748 to change the name of an 

existing VEU in the PRC, from Lam 

Research Corporation to Lam Research 

Service Co., Ltd. 

DATES: This rule is effective September 

6, 2013. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Karen Nies-Vogel, Chair, End-User 

Review Committee, Bureau of Industry 

and Security, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street & Pennsylvania 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; by 

telephone: (202) 482–5991, fax: (202) 

482–3991, or email: ERC@bis.doc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Authorization Validated End-User 

Validated End-Users (VEUs) are 

designated entities located in eligible 

destinations to which eligible items may 

be exported, reexported, or transferred 

(in-country) under a general 

authorization instead of a license. The 

names of the VEUs, as well as the dates 

they were so designated, and their 

respective eligible destinations and 

items are identified in Supplement No. 

7 to part 748 of the Export 

Administration Regulations (EAR). 

Under the terms described in that 

supplement, VEUs may obtain eligible 

items without an export license from the 

Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), 

in conformity with Section 748.15 of the 

EAR. Eligible items vary between VEUs, 

but may include commodities, software, 

and technology, except those controlled 

for missile technology or crime control 

reasons on the Commerce Control List 

(CCL) (part 774 of the EAR). 

VEUs are reviewed and approved by 

the U.S. Government in accordance with 

the provisions of Section 748.15 and 

Supplement Nos. 8 and 9 to part 748 of 

the EAR. The End-User Review 

Committee (ERC), composed of 

representatives from the Departments of 

State, Defense, Energy, and Commerce, 

and other agencies, as appropriate, is 

responsible for administering the VEU 

program. BIS amended the Export 

Administration Regulations (EAR) in a 

final rule published on June 19, 2007 

(72 FR 33646) to create Authorization 

VEU. 

Addition to the List of Validated EndUser Authorizations in the People’s 

Republic of China (PRC) 

Addition of Intel Semiconductor 

(Dalian) Ltd. to the List of Validated 

End-Users in the PRC and Its ‘‘Eligible 

Destinations’’ and ‘‘Eligible Items 

(By ECCN)’’ 

This final rule amends Supplement 

No. 7 to part 748 of the EAR to add Intel 

Dalian as a VEU, and to identify its 

eligible destinations and the items that 

may be exported, reexported or 

transferred (in-country) to Intel Dalian 

under Authorization VEU, effective the 

date of this rule. The names and 

addresses of this newly-appointed VEU 

and its eligible destinations are as 

follows: 

Validated End-User 

Intel Semiconductor (Dalian) Ltd. 

Eligible Destinations 

Intel Semiconductor (Dalian) Ltd., No. 109 

Huai He Road East, Dalian Economic and 

Technology Development Area, Dalian, 

Liao Ning Province, 116600, China. 

Intel Semiconductor (Dalian) Ltd., c/o Dalian 

Kintetsu Logistics Co., Ltd, Dayaowan 

Bonded Port No. 6 Road W4 Unit A1, 

Dalian Economic and Technology 

Development Area, Dalian, Liao Ning 

Province, 116601, China. 

Eligible Items (by ECCN) That May Be 

Exported, Reexported or Transferred 

(In-Country) to the Eligible Destination 

Identified Under Intel Semiconductor 

(Dalian) Ltd.’s Validated End-User 

Authorization 

For Intel Semiconductor (Dalian) Ltd., 

Export Control Classification Numbers 

(ECCNs) 1A004, 1C006.d, 2A226, 

2A292, 2B006.b, 2B230, 2B231, 2B350, 

3A233.a, 3B001 (except for multilayer 

masks with a phase shift layer designed 

to produce ‘‘space qualified’’ 

semiconductor devices), 3C002, 3E002 

(excluding development and production 

technology specific to digital signal 

processors and digital array processors 

and further limited to ‘‘technology’’ 

based on the international technology 

roadmap for semiconductors (ITRS)), 

and 4E001(limited to technology for 

computer products or components not 

exceeding an adjusted peak performance 

(APP) level of 12.0 weighted teraflops). 

For Intel Semiconductor (Dalian) Ltd., 

c/o Dalian Kintetsu Logistics Co., Ltd., 

ECCNs 1A004, 1C006.d, 2A226, 2A292, 

2B006.b, 2B230, 2B231, 2B350, 3A233.a, 

3B001 (except for multilayer masks with 

a phase shift layer designed to produce 

‘‘space qualified’’ semiconductor 

devices), and 3C002. 

Technical Change for Existing VEU in 

the PRC 

Change of Name of VEU Lam Research 

Corporation in the PRC 

This final rule also amends 

Supplement No. 7 to part 748 of the 

EAR to change the name of an existing 

VEU, Lam Research Corporation, to Lam 

Research Service Co., Ltd.. This name 

change is made to list the name of the 

U.S. company’s Chinese subsidiary 

because that is the actual name of the 

authorized VEU. 

Current Validated End-User Name: 

Lam Research Corporation. 

New Name of Validated End-User: 

Lam Research Service Co., Ltd. 

Authorization VEU eliminates the 

burden on exporters and reexporters of 

preparing individual license 

applications because the export, 

reexport and transfer (in-country) of the 

eligible items specified for each VEU 

may be made under general 

authorization instead of under 

individual licenses. With the addition of 

Intel Dalian as a VEU, exporters and 

reexporters can supply Intel Dalian 

much more quickly, thus enhancing the 

competitiveness of both the VEU and its 

suppliers of U.S-origin items. 

To ensure appropriate facilitation of 

exports and reexports, on-site reviews of 

VEUs, including Intel Dalian, may be 

warranted pursuant to Section 

748.15(f)(2) of the EAR and Section 7(iv) 

of Supplement No. 8 to part 748 of the 

EAR. If such a review is warranted, BIS 

will inform the PRC Ministry of 

Commerce. 

Since August 21, 2001, the Export 

Administration Act has been in lapse 

and the President, through Executive 

Order 13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR, 

2001 Comp., p. 783 (2002)), as amended 

by Executive Order 13637 of March 8, 

2013, 78 FR 16129 (March 13, 2013), 

and as extended most recently by the 

Notice of August 8, 2013, 78 FR 49107 

(August 12, 2013), has continued the 

EAR in effect under the International 

Emergency Economic Powers Act. BIS 

continues to carry out the provisions of 

the Export Administration Act, as 

appropriate and to the extent permitted 

by law, pursuant to Executive Order 

13222. 

Rulemaking Requirements 

1. Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 

direct agencies to assess all costs and 

benefits of available regulatory 

alternatives and, if regulation is 

necessary, to select regulatory 

approaches that maximize net benefits 

(including potential economic, 

environmental, public health and safety 

effects, distributive impacts, and 


ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
54754 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 173 / Friday, September 6, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 

equity). Executive Order 13563 

emphasizes the importance of 

quantifying both costs and benefits, 

reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and 

promoting flexibility. This rule has been 

determined to be not significant for 

purposes of Executive Order 12866. 

2. This rule involves collections 

previously approved by the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) under 

Control Number 0694–0088, ‘‘MultiPurpose Application,’’ which carries a 

burden hour estimate of 43.8 minutes to 

prepare and submit form BIS–748; and 

for recordkeeping, reporting and review 

requirements in connection with 

Authorization VEU, which carries an 

estimated burden of 30 minutes per 

submission. This rule is expected to 

result in a decrease in license 

applications submitted to BIS. Total 

burden hours associated with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) (PRA) and OMB 

Control Number 0694–0088 are not 

expected to increase significantly as a 

result of this rule. 

Notwithstanding any other provisions 

of law, no person is required to respond 

to, nor be subject to a penalty for failure 

to comply with a collection of 

information subject to the requirements 

of the PRA, unless that collection of 

information displays a currently valid 

OMB Control Number. 

3. This rule does not contain policies 

with Federalism implications as that 

term is defined under Executive Order 

13132. 

4. Pursuant to the Administrative 

Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. 

553(b)(B), BIS finds good cause to waive 

requirements that this rule be subject to 

notice and the opportunity for public 

comment because they are unnecessary. 

In determining whether to grant VEU 

designations, a committee of U.S. 

Government agencies evaluates 

information about and commitments 

made by candidate companies, the 

nature and terms of which are set forth 

in 15 CFR part 748, Supplement No. 8. 

The criteria for evaluation by the 

committee are set forth in 15 CFR 

748.15(a)(2). 

The information, commitments, and 

criteria for this extensive review were 

all established through the notice of 

proposed rulemaking and public 

comment process (71 FR 38313 (July 6, 

2006) (proposed rule), and 72 FR 33646 

(June 19, 2007) (final rule)). Given the 

similarities between the authorizations 

provided under the VEU program and 

export licenses (as discussed further 

below), the publication of this 

information does not establish new 

policy. In publishing this final rule, BIS 

merely adds to the list of VEUs and the 

respective eligible items and 

destinations and implements a technical 

change, which is to change the name of 

an existing VEU, all within the 

established regulatory framework of the 

Authorization VEU program. Further, 

this rule does not abridge the rights of 

the public or eliminate the public’s 

option to export under any of the forms 

of authorization set forth in the EAR. 

Publication of this rule in other than 

final form is unnecessary because the 

authorizations granted in the rule are 

consistent with the authorizations 

granted to exporters for individual 

licenses (and amendments or revisions 

thereof), which do not undergo public 

review. In addition, as with license 

applications, VEU authorization 

applications contain confidential 

business information, which is 

necessary for the extensive review 

conducted by the U.S. Government in 

assessing such applications. This 

information is extensively reviewed 

according to the criteria for VEU 

authorizations, as set out in 15 CFR 

748.15(a)(2). Additionally, just as the 

interagency reviews license 

applications, the authorizations granted 

under the VEU program involve 

interagency deliberation and result from 

review of public and non-public 

sources, including licensing data, and 

the measurement of such information 

against the VEU authorization criteria. 

Given the nature of the review, and in 

light of the parallels between the VEU 

application review process and the 

review of license applications, public 

comment on this authorization and 

subsequent amendments prior to 

publication is unnecessary. Moreover, 

because, as noted above, the criteria and 

process for authorizing and 

administering VEUs were developed 

with public comments, allowing 

additional public comment on this 

amendment to individual VEU 

authorizations, which was determined 

according to those criteria, is 

unnecessary. 

Section 553(d) of the APA generally 

provides that rules may not take effect 

earlier than thirty (30) days after they 

are published in the Federal Register. 

BIS finds good cause to waive the 30- 

day delay in effectiveness under 5 

U.S.C. 553(d)(3) because the delay 

would be contrary to the public interest. 

BIS is simply amending the list of VEU 

authorizations by adding a new end 

user, consistent with established 

objectives and parameters administered 

and enforced by the responsible 

designated departmental representatives 

to the End-User Review Committee. 

Delaying this action’s effectiveness 

could cause confusion with the new 

VEU status as determined by those 

authorized government representatives 

and stifle the ongoing purpose of the 

VEU Authorization Program. 

Accordingly, it is contrary to the public 

interest to delay this rule’s effectiveness. 

No other law requires that a notice of 

proposed rulemaking and an 

opportunity for public comment be 

given for this final rule. Because a 

notice of proposed rulemaking and an 

opportunity for public comment are not 

required under the APA or by any other 

law, the analytical requirements of the 

Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 

et seq.) are not applicable. As a result, 

no final regulatory flexibility analysis is 

required and none has been prepared. 

List of Subjects in 15 CFR Part 748 

Administrative practice and 

procedure, Exports, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements. 

Accordingly, part 748 of the EAR (15 

CFR parts 730–774) is amended as 

follows: 

PART 748—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for 15 CFR 

part 748 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 

U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 

3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66 

FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Notice 

of August 8, 2013, 78 FR 49107 (August 12, 

2013). 

■ 2. Amend Supplement No. 7 to part 

748 to: 

■ a. Remove the name of ‘‘Lam Research 

Corporation’’ from the Validated EndUser column in ‘‘China (People’s 

Republic of)’’ and add in its place ‘‘Lam 

Research Service Co., Ltd.’’; and 

■ b. Add in alphabetical order the entry 

‘‘Intel Semiconductor (Dalian) Ltd.’’ in 

‘‘China (People’s Republic of)’’ to read 

as follows: 


ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 173 / Friday, September 6, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 54755 

SUPPLEMENT NO. 7 TO PART 748—AUTHORIZATION VALIDATED END-USER (VEU): LIST OF VALIDATED END-USERS, 

RESPECTIVE ITEMS ELIGIBLE FOR EXPORT, REEXPORT AND TRANSFER, AND ELIGIBLE DESTINATIONS

Country Validated end-user Eligible items 

(by ECCN) Eligible destination Federal Register citation 

Nothing in this Supplement shall be deemed to supersede other provisions in the EAR, including but not limited to § 748.15(c). 

*******

Intel Semiconductor 

(Dalian) Ltd.

These items authorized for the Intel destination identified by one asterisk (*): 

1A004, 1C006.d, 2A226, 2A292, 2B006.b, 

2B230, 2B231, 2B350, 3A233.a, 3B001 

(except for multilayer masks with a phase 

shift layer designed to produce ‘‘space 

qualified’’ semiconductor devices), 3C002, 

3E002 (excluding development and production technology specific to digital signal 

processors and digital array processors 

and further limited to ‘‘technology’’ based 

on the international technology roadmap 

for semiconductors (ITRS)), and 

4E001(limited to technology for computer 

products or components not exceeding an 

adjusted peak performance (APP) level of 

12.0 weighted teraflops).

*Intel Semiconductor 

(Dalian) Ltd., No. 

109 Huai He Road 

East, Dalian Economic and Technology Development Area, Dalian, 

Liao Ning Province, 

116600, China.

78 FR [INSERT 

PAGE NUMBER], 

9–6–13. 

.................................... These items authorized for the Intel destination identified by two asterisks (**): 

1A004, 1C006.d, 2A226, 2A292, 2B006.b, 

2B230, 2B231, 2B350, 3A233.a, 3B001 

(except for multilayer masks with a phase 

shift layer designed to produce ‘‘space 

qualified’’ semiconductor devices), and 

3C002.

** Intel Semiconductor 

(Dalian) Ltd., c/o 

Dalian Kintetsu Logistics Co., Ltd, 

Dayaowan Bonded 

Port No. 6 Road 

W4 Unit A1, Dalian 

Economic and 

Technology Development Area, 

Dalian, Liao Ning 

Province, 116601, 

China.

*******

Dated: August 29, 2013. 

Matthew S. Borman, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Export 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2013–21579 Filed 9–5–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–33–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

19 CFR Part 101 

[Docket No. USCBP–2012–0006; CBP Dec. 

13–13] 

Extension of Port Limits of 

Indianapolis, IN 

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection, DHS. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP) is extending the 

geographical limits of the port of entry 

of Indianapolis, Indiana. This extension 

will make the boundaries more easily 

identifiable to the public and will allow 

for uniform and continuous service to 

the extended area of Indianapolis, 

Indiana. The change is part of CBP’s 

continuing program to use its personnel, 

facilities, and resources more efficiently, 

and to provide better service to carriers, 

importers, and the general public. 

DATES: Effective Date: October 7, 2013. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Roger Kaplan, Office of Field 

Operations, U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection, by phone at (202) 325–4543, 

or by email at Roger.Kaplan@dhs.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

In a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 

(NPRM) published in the Federal 

Register (77 FR 24656) on April 25, 

2012, CBP proposed to amend the list of 

CBP ports of entry at 19 CFR 101.3(b)(1) 

to extend the limits of the Indianapolis, 

Indiana, port of entry to include all the 

territory within the boundaries of 

Marion County, Indiana, as well as 

portions of the neighboring counties of 

Boone, Hendricks, and Johnson. This 

update will allow CBP to better serve 

the public in the greater Indianapolis 

area by providing regular service to 

municipalities within Indianapolis that 

are not technically within the city 

limits, and to locations to the immediate 

west and south of the city. CBP 

determined that the proposed boundary 

changes would not result in a change in 

the service that is provided to the public 

by the port and would not change the 

workload at the port or require a change 

in the staffing at the port. Further 

background information is provided in 

the NPRM. 

Interested parties were given until 

June 25, 2012, to comment on the 

proposed changes. CBP received one 

comment in response to the NPRM. 

II. Comment Analysis 

Comment: The commenter notes that 

Indianapolis, Indiana, is surrounded by 


ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES