# C_2011013EN.01003201.xml

| 15.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/32

---

Action brought on 8 November 2010 — Seikoh Giken v OHIM — Seiko (SG SEIKOH GIKEN)

(Case T-519/10)

()

2011/C 13/61

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Kabushiki Kaisha Seikoh Giken (Matsudo-shi, Japan) (represented by: G. Marín Raigal, P. López Ronda and G. Macias Bonilla, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Seiko Kabushiki Kaisha (Chuo-ku, Japan)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 12 August 2010 in case R 1553/2009-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 12 August 2010 in case R 1553/2009-1;

| — | Reject in its entirety the opposition to registration of the mark applied for in respect of the goods in class 25; |
| --- | --- |

—

Reject in its entirety the opposition to registration of the mark applied for in respect of the goods in class 25;

| — | Order the defendant to grant registration of the mark applied for; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to grant registration of the mark applied for;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of the current proceedings; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of the current proceedings; and

| — | Order the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs of the current proceedings, should it become an intervening party in this case. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs of the current proceedings, should it become an intervening party in this case.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘SG SEIKOH GIKEN’, for goods in classes 3, 7 and 9 — Community trade mark application No 908461

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited: Community trade mark registration No 2390953 of the word mark ‘SEIKO’, for goods and services in classes 1– 42

Mark or sign cited:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: The applicant considers that the contested decision of the First Board of Appeal infringes the provisions of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, hereinafter CTMR, by a misleading, incorrect interpretation and inappropriate enforcement of Article 8(1)(b) CTMR and the applicable case-law.

Pleas in law:

---