alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013156EN.01000801.xml

| 1.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 March 2013 — European Commission v Buczek Automotive sp. z o.o., Republic of Poland

(Case C-405/11 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - State aid - Restructuring of the Polish steel industry - Concept of State aid - Recovery of public debts - Classification as State aid of the failure to request the liquidation of the debtor undertaking - Private creditor test - Allocation of the burden of proof - Limits of judicial review)

2013/C 156/11

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Parties

Appellant: European Commission (represented by: A. Stobiecka-Kuik and T. Maxian Rusche, acting as Agents)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Buczek Automotive sp. z o.o. (represented by: J. Jurczyk, radca prawny), Republic of Poland (represented by: M. Krasnodębska-Tomkiel, acting as Agent)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 17 May 2011 in Case T-1/08 Buczek Automotive v Commission by which the General Court partially annulled Commission Decision 2008/344/EC of 23 October 2007 on State Aid C-23/06 (ex NN 35/06) which Poland has implemented for steel producer Technologie Buczek Group (OJ 2008 L 116, p. 26) — Classification as State aid of the failure to request the liquidation of the debtor undertaking — Error of law in the assessment of the Commission’s application of the hypothetical private creditor test and in the allocation of the burden of proof

Buczek Automotive

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal.

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.

| 3. | Orders the Republic of Poland to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Republic of Poland to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 311, 22.10.2011.

1

---
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

The Board of Directors 

Orthovita, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statement (Nos. 333-66681, 333-90981, 333-100034, 333-107282, 333-118219, 333-131667 and 333-145723) on Form S-8 and in the Registration Statement (Nos. 333-47386, 333-59288, 333-84632, 333-88334, 333-100341, 333-107210, 333-111697,333-118216, 333-131668, 333-145724 and 333-141403) on Form S-3 of Orthovita, Inc. and subsidiaries of our reports dated March 17, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Orthovita, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and comprehensive loss and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, and the effectiveness of internal controlover financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, which reports appear in the December 31, 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Orthovita, Inc. 

Ourreport dated March 17, 2008 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Orthovita, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity,comprehensive loss and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007 refers to Orthovita, Inc.’s adoption of the fair value method of accounting for stock-based compensation as required by Statement ofFinancial Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share-Based Payment, effective January 1, 2006. 

/s/ KPMG LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

March 17, 2008
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 632 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the inclusion of 

certain fringe benefit expenses for which a deduction is disallowed in 

unrelated business taxable income. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 28, 2019 

Mr. LANKFORD (for himself and Mr. COONS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal 

the inclusion of certain fringe benefit expenses for which 

a deduction is disallowed in unrelated business taxable 

income. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Lessen Impediments 

5 From Taxes for Charities Act’’ or the ‘‘LIFT for Charities 

6 Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 632 IS

1 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF INCLUSION OF CERTAIN FRINGE BEN2 EFIT EXPENSES IN UNRELATED BUSINESS 

3 TAXABLE INCOME. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 512(a) of the Internal 

5 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking paragraph 

6 (7). 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 this section shall take effect as if included in the amend9 ments made by section 13703 of Public Law 115–97. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
#### § 1313.102 Application.

This part applies to all programs or activities conducted by the agency.
**Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 July 2011 – Micşa v Administrația Finanțelor Publice Lugoj and Others**

**(Case C-573/10)**

Article 104(3), first indent, of the Rules of Procedure – Internal taxation – Article 110 TFEU – Pollution tax levied on first registration of motor vehicles

Tax provisions – Internal taxation – Pollution tax levies on motor vehicles on their first registration in national territory – Tax applicable to imported second-hand vehicles and without any equivalent for vehicles of the same age and the same condition
present on the national market – Not permissible (Art. 110 TFEU) (see paras 22-23, 25, operative part)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Reference for a preliminary ruling – Curtea de Appel Timișoara – Registration of second-hand vehicles previously registered in other Member States – Environmental tax on motor vehicles on their first registration in a Member State – Compatibility of national legislation with Article 110 TFEU – Validity of the exemption from payment of the tax in respect of certain categories of vehicle. |

**Operative part**

Article 110 TFEU must be interpreted as meaning that it precludes a Member State from introducing a pollution tax on motor
vehicles on first registration in that Member State if that fiscal measure is set up in such a way as to discourage the placing
on the market in that Member State of second-hand vehicles purchased in other Member States without discouraging the purchase
of second-hand vehicles of a similar age and condition on the national market.
### §§257 to 257i. Repealed. Pub. L. 90–628, §1(b), Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1320

Section 257, acts May 21, 1928, ch. 664, §1, 45 Stat. 685; June 28, 1954, ch. 406, §1, 68 Stat. 301; Aug. 30, 1964, Pub. L. 88–516, §1, 78 Stat. 697, set dimensions for standard hampers and round stave baskets.

Section 257a, acts May 21, 1928, ch. 664, §2, 45 Stat. 685; Aug. 30, 1964, Pub. L. 88–516, §2, 78 Stat. 697, set dimensions for standard splint baskets.

Section 257b, act May 21, 1928, ch. 664, §3, 45 Stat. 686, provided for promulgation of regulations allowing reasonable variations in hampers and baskets.

Section 257c, act May 21, 1928, ch. 664, §4, 45 Stat. 686, required approval by Secretary of Agriculture of manufacturer's dimension specifications for hampers and baskets.

Section 257d, acts May 21, 1928, ch. 664, §5, 45 Stat. 686; Aug. 30, 1964, Pub. L. 88–516, §3, 78 Stat. 697, set out penalties for violations and covered guaranty given by manufacturers and sellers of hampers and baskets as to their correctness.

Section 257e, act May 21, 1928, ch. 664, §6, 45 Stat. 686, provided for seizure of illegal hampers and baskets, and procedure covering their condemnation.

Section 257f, act May 21, 1928, ch. 664, §7, 45 Stat. 687, allowed manufacture of hampers and baskets for foreign sale in conformity with foreign specifications.

Section 257g, acts May 21, 1928, ch. 664, §8, 45 Stat. 687; June 25, 1948, ch. 646, §1, 62 Stat. 909, placed upon the United States Attorney the duty to prosecute for violations of sections 257 to 257i of this title.

Section 257h, act May 21, 1928, ch. 664, §9, 45 Stat. 687, provided for promulgation of regulations covering examinations and tests by Secretary of Agriculture.

Section 257i, act May 21, 1968, ch. 664, §10, 45 Stat. 687, authorized Secretary of Agriculture to cooperate with other agencies in carrying out sections 257 to 257i of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective 60 days after Oct. 22, 1968, see section 3 of Pub. L. 90–628, set out as a note under section 251 of this title.
§ 1318.501 Mitigation commitment identification, auditing, and reporting. ( a ) All appropriate measures to mitigate expected significant adverse environmental impacts (“mitigation measures”) must be identified in an EA or EIS. Those mitigation measures to which TVA commits must be identified in the associated FONSI or ROD (or the documentation, if any, prepared for a categorical exclusion).
( b ) Each mitigation commitment that is not required under regulations will be assigned by the NEPA compliance staff to the TVA entity responsible for implementing the commitment. The NEPA compliance staff should consult with the responsible entities to resolve assignment conflicts, identify supporting offices, and determine implementation schedules.
( c ) The responsible entity shall report to the NEPA compliance staff the status of mitigation commitments periodically or whenever a specific request is made.
( d ) The NEPA compliance staff must ensure that commitments are met and will verify commitment progress.
( e ) Circumstances may arise that warrant modifying or cancelling previously made commitments. The decision to modify or cancel a commitment will be made by the NEPA compliance staff in consultation with TVA legal counsel, after considering the environmental significance of such a change.
### §6410. Relation to other programs

Nothing in this chapter may be construed to preempt or supersede any other program relating to propane education and research organized and operated under the laws of the United States or any State.

(Pub. L. 104–284, §11, Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3375.)
p100058.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 10-0058

Focus Ready Draft 12/14/2009

ENGINEER: El-Zoobi \ AH

PV (kg/yr): 

SUBMITTER: 

USE: 

 

OTHER USES: 

 

MSDS: Yes Label: No

Gen Eqpt:

Respirator:

Health Effects: 

TLV/PEL:

CRSS :

Chemical Name:

S-H20: g/L @

VP: torr @

MW: %<500 %<1000

Physical State and Misc CRSS Info:

Neat: 

Consumer Use: 

SAT (concerns) (12/01/2009):

Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info:

Migration to groundwater: Slow

PBT rating: P3B2T2 PMN P1B1T2; Incin Pdt P3B2T2

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 6
p100058.eng

Health: 2-3 Dermal, Drinking Water, Inhalation

Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 5ppb)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2A

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

None provided.

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: 

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 10-0058

Number of Sites/ Location: 

Days/yr: 

Basis:

Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 6
p100058.eng

Output 2:

to: 

from:

basis:

to: 

from: 

basis: 

Output

to: 

from: 

basis: 

to: 

from: 

basis: 

n

Output

 

to: 

from: 

basis:

RELEASE TOTAL

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: 

Basis: 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 6
p100058.eng

Inhalation:

Exposure to 

Typical: 

Worst Case: 

Number of workers (all sites) with inhalation exposure: 

Basis:

 

 

 

Exposure to 

Typical: Worst Case: r

Number of workers (all sites) with inhalation exposure: 

Basis:

Dermal:

Exposure to 

High End: 

Number of workers (all sites) with dermal exposure: 

Basis: 

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 10-0058

Number of Sites/ Location: 

 Days/yr: 

Basis:

Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note:

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 6
p100058.eng

medium. 

Typical: 

Worst Case: 

to: 

from: 

basis: 

Output 2: 

to: 

from: 

basis: 

 

 

RELEASE TOTAL

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: 

Basis: 

Inhalation:

Exposure to 

Typical: 

Worst Case: 

Number of workers (all sites) with inhalation exposure: 

Basis:

Dermal:

Exposure to 

High End: 

Number of workers (all sites) with dermal exposure: 

EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 6
p100058.eng

Basis:

EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 6
#### § 1301.33 General exemptions.

Individuals may not have access to records maintained by TVA but which were provided by another agency which has determined by regulation that such information is subject to general exemption under 5 U.S.C. 552a(j). If such exempt records are within a request for access, TVA will advise the individual of their existence and of the name and address of the source agency. For any further information concerning the record and the exemption, the individual must contact that source agency.

[75 FR 11736, Mar. 12, 2010. Redesignated at 82 FR 51757, Nov. 8, 2017]
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of WNC Housing Tax Credit
Fund IV, L.P., Series 2 (the "Partnership") for the year ended March 31, 2003 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  and  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.,  section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  I,  Wilfred N.  Cooper,  Jr.,
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner
of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Partnership.


/s/WILFRED N. COOPER, JR.
-------------------------
Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
July 7, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 49 (Monday, March 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 13649]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5798]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Martin Delaney Collaboratory: 
Towards an HIV-1 Cure.
    Date: April 4-6, 2011.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hilton Silver Spring, 8727 Colesville Road, Silver 
Spring, MD 20910.
    Contact Person: Jay Bruce Sundstrom, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, DEA/NIAID/NIH/DHHS, 6700B 
Rockledge Drive, MSC-7616, Room 3119, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-
496-7042, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e093958e849394928f8d8aa08e89818984ce8e8988ce878f96"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9feceaf1fbecebedf0f2f5dff1f6fef6fbb1f1f6f7b1f8f0e9">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 8, 2011.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-5798 Filed 3-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 2.25 Ratemaking treatment of the cost of emissions allowances in coordination transactions. ( a ) *General Policy.* This Statement of Policy is adopted in furtherance of the goals of Title IV of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, Pub. L. 101-549, Title IV, 104 Stat. 2399, 2584 (1990).
( b ) *Costing Emissions Allowances in Coordination Sales.* If a public utility's coordination rate on file with the Commission provides for recovery of variable costs on an incremental basis, the Commission will allow recovery of the incremental costs of emissions allowances associated with a coordination sale. If a coordination rate does not reflect incremental costs, the public utility should propose alternative allowance costing methods or demonstrate that the coordination rate does not produce unreasonable results. The Commission finds that the cost to replace an allowance is an appropriate basis to establish the incremental cost.
( c ) *Use of Indices.* The Commission will allow public utilities to determine emissions allowance costs on the basis of an index or combination of indices of the current price of emissions allowances, provided that the public utility affords purchasing utilities the option of providing emissions allowances. Public utilities should explain and justify any use of different incremental cost indices for pricing coordination sales and making dispatch decisions.
( d ) *Calculation of Amount of Emissions Allowances Associated With Coordination Transactions.* Public utilities should explain the methods used to compute the amount of emissions allowances included in coordination transactions.
( e ) *Timing.* ( 1 ) Public utilities should provide information to purchasing utilities regarding the timing of opportunities for purchasers to stipulate whether they will purchase or return emissions allowances. A public utility may require a purchasing utility to declare, no later than the beginning of the coordination transaction: ( i ) Whether it will purchase or return emissions allowances; and
( ii ) If it will return emissions allowances, the date on which those allowances will be returned.
( 2 ) Public utilities may include in agreements with purchasing utilities non-discriminatory provisions for indemnification if the purchasing utility fails to provide emissions allowances by the date on which it declares that the allowances will be returned.
( f ) *Other Costing Methods Not Precluded.* The ratemaking treatment of emissions allowance costs endorsed in this Policy Statement does not preclude other approaches proposed by individual utilities on a case-by-case basis.
[59 FR 65938, Dec. 22, 1994, as amended by Order 579, 60 FR 22261, May 5, 1995]
§ 367.1240 Account 124, Other investments. ( a ) This account must include the book cost of investments in securities issued or assumed by non-associate companies, investment advances to these companies, and any investments not accounted for elsewhere. This account must also include unrealized holding gains and losses on trading and available-for-sale types of security investments. Include also the offsetting entry to the recording of amortization of discount or premium on interest bearing investments. (*See* account 419, Interest and dividend income (§ 367.4190).)
( b ) The records must be maintained in a manner so as to show the amount of each investment and the investment advances to each person.
#### § 202.5 Hearing.

The hearing will be oral unless all parties waive oral hearing. It will be written if not oral. Notice of the date, time and place of oral hearing, or of the date and place for filing of written submissions in a written hearing, will be served on the Administrator and the respondent, and on such other persons as have requested in writing to be heard.
### §1452. Unfair and deceptive packaging and labeling; scope of prohibition

#### (a) Nonconforming labels

It shall be unlawful for any person engaged in the packaging or labeling of any consumer commodity (as defined in this chapter) for distribution in commerce, or for any person (other than a common carrier for hire, a contract carrier for hire, or a freight forwarder for hire) engaged in the distribution in commerce of any packaged or labeled consumer commodity, to distribute or to cause to be distributed in commerce any such commodity if such commodity is contained in a package, or if there is affixed to that commodity a label, which does not conform to the provisions of this chapter and of regulations promulgated under the authority of this chapter.

#### (b) Exemptions

The prohibition contained in subsection (a) shall not apply to persons engaged in business as wholesale or retail distributors of consumer commodities except to the extent that such persons (1) are engaged in the packaging or labeling of such commodities, or (2) prescribe or specify by any means the manner in which such commodities are packaged or labeled.

(Pub. L. 89–755, §3, Nov. 3, 1966, 80 Stat. 1296.)
Gross Liability Gross Premium Gross Indemnity Retained Liability Retained Premium Retained Ind

 306,176,249 13,440,738,773 488,911,370 10,102,388,142 226,636,439 350,5

Footnote:Amounts shown are for policies that have reached the Premium Billing Date according to the actuarial documents. 

2020 Livestock Reinsurance Data

National Totals

As of 03/2024

Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 49 (Monday, March 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13646-13647]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5808]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Resources and Services Administration


Statement of Delegation of Authority

    Notice is hereby given that I have delegated to the Administrator, 
Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), authority vested 
in the Secretary under Title XX, Section 2008(b) of the Social Security 
Act (42 U.S.C. 1397g(b)), as added by Section 5507(a) of the Affordable 
Care Act, as it pertains to the functions assigned to HRSA. This 
authority may be redelegated.
    HRSA will consult with the Assistant Secretary for Planning and 
Evaluation, as appropriate, in implementing this authority.
    This delegation excludes the authority to issue regulations, to 
establish advisory councils and committees and appoint their members, 
and to submit reports to Congress, and shall be exercised in accordance 
with the Department's applicable policies, procedures, and guidelines. 
In addition, I hereby affirm and ratify any actions taken by the 
Administrator, HRSA, or other HRSA officials, which involved

[[Page 13647]]

the exercise of this authority prior to the effective date of this 
delegation.
    This delegation is effective upon date of signature.

    Dated: March 4, 2011.
Kathleen Sebelius,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-5808 Filed 3-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165-15-P