alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 49 (Monday, March 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13650-13651]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5788]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human 
Development; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel; Human Capital Interventions 
Across Childhood and Adolescence.
    Date: April 5, 2011.
    Time: 10:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call)
    Contact Person: Carla T. Walls, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Division Of Scientific Review, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National 
Institute of Child Health and

[[Page 13651]]

Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5B01, Bethesda, 
MD 20892, 301-435-6898, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e691878a8a9585a68b878f8ac8888f8ec8818990"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ed9a8c81819e8ead808c8481c3838485c38a829b">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 8, 2011.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-5788 Filed 3-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 11.11 Compromise.

DHS may compromise a debt in accordance with the provisions of 31 CFR part 902. The Chief Financial Officer is authorized to compromise debts owed to DHS. No debt over $10,000 may be compromised without the concurrence of the Office of the General Counsel.
PHANTOM 3 

(PROFESSIONAL) 

Quick Start Guide 

V1.0 
Phantom 3 Professional 

It's time to meet your Phantom 3 Professional. 

The Phantom 3 Professional's camera records video at up to 4K and captures 12 megapixel photos. 

Review the diagram below for a full list of your Phantom 3 Professional's parts: 

1. Gimbal and Camera 8. Aircraft Status Indicators 

2. Vision Positioning System 9. Antennas 

3. Camera Micro·SD Card Slot 10. Intelligent Flight Battery 

4. Aircraft Micro-USB Port 11 . Power Button 

5. Front LEDs 12. Battery Level Indicators 

6. Motors 13. Link Button 

7. Propellers 14. Camera Micro-USB Port 
Remote Controller 

This powerful Remote Controller allows you to pilot and maneuver your Phantom 3 Professional at distances over 6,000 feet (2 km)" away, while putting selected camera controls at your fingertips. 

Built into your Remote Controller is a rechargeable UPo battery and DJI Ughtbridge, which when paired with a compatible 

mobile device gives you a live HD view from the Phantom's camera. 

Folded 

1 1. Gimbal Dial 

12. Camera Settings Dial 

13. Video Recording Button 

14. Flight Mode Switch 

15. Shutter Button 

16. Playback Button 

17. C1/C2 Buttons (Customizable) 

18. USB Port 

19. Micro-USB Port 

1. Power Button 

2. Return to Home (RTH) Button 

3. Control Sticks 

4. Status LED 

5. Battery Level LEOs 

6. Power Port 

7. Mobile Device Holder 

8. Small Device Positioning Tabs 

(such as mobile phone) 

9. Antennas 

10. Handle Bar 

Mobile device connection 

* This maximum transmission distance was tested in a lab environment and is for reference only. The maximum operating distance may vary depending 

on conditions in your immediate surroundings.
§ 1309.9 How does TVA provide financial assistance in conformity with the Act? ( a ) TVA contributes financial assistance only under agreements which contain a provision which specifically requires compliance with the Act and this part. If the financial assistance involves the furnishing of real property, the agreement shall obligate the recipient, or the transferee in the case of a subsequent transfer, for the period during which the real property is used for a purpose for which the financial assistance is extended or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits. Where the financial assistance involves the furnishing of personal property, the agreement shall obligate the recipient during the period for which ownership or possession of the property is retained. In all other cases the agreement shall obligate the recipient for the period during which financial assistance is extended pursuant to the agreement. TVA shall specify the form of the foregoing agreement, and the extent to which an agreement shall be applicable to subcontractors, transferees, successors in interest, and other participants.
( b ) In the case of real property, structures or improvements thereon, or interests therein, acquired through a program of TVA financial assistance, or in the case where TVA financial assistance was provided in the form of a transfer by TVA of real property or an interest therein, the instrument effecting or recording the transfer of title shall contain a covenant running with the land assuring compliance with this part and the guidelines contained herein for the period during which the real property is used for a purpose for which the TVA financial assistance is extended or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits. Where no transfer of property is involved, but property is improved with TVA financial assistance, the recipient shall agree to include such a covenant in any subsequent transfer of such property. Where the property is obtained by transfer from TVA, the covenant against discrimination may also include a condition coupled with a right to be reserved by TVA to revert title to the property in the event of a breach of the covenant where, in the discretion of TVA, such a condition and right of reverter is appropriate to the nature of ( 1 ) the statute under which the real property is obtained,
( 2 ) the recipient, and
( 3 ) the instrument effecting or recording the transfer of title. In such event, if a transferee of real property proposes to mortgage or otherwise encumber the real property as security for financing construction of new, or improvement of existing, facilities on such property for the purposes for which the property was transferred, TVA may agree, upon request of the transferee and if necessary to accomplish such financing, and upon such conditions as it deems appropriate, to forbear the exercise of such right to revert title for so long as the lien of such mortgage or other encumbrance remains effective.
[46 FR 30811, June 11, 1981, as amended at 68 FR 51357, Aug. 26, 2003]
#### Gustave A. Helm, Appellant, v. Thomas A. Ennis and Charles F. Stoppani, Composing the Firm of Ennis & Stoppani, Respondents.

Judgment affirmed, With costs. No opinion.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PERSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Gunther International Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc I.
Perkins, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and, I, John K. Carpenter,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
the best of my knowledge and belief that:

         1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a)
              or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and result of
              operations of the Company.

/s/ Marc I. Perkins
-----------------------
Marc I. Perkins
Chief Executive Officer
June 30, 2003

/s/ John K. Carpenter
------------------------
John K. Carpenter
Chief Financial Officer
June 30, 2003

         A signed original of this certification has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certifications are
accompanying the Company's Form 10-KSB solely pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63
of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form
10-KSB or as a separate disclosure document.
#### § 1b.2 Scope.

This part applies to investigations conducted by the Commission but does not apply to adjudicative proceedings.
# C_2010179EN.01005401.xml

| 3.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/54

---

Action brought on 5 May 2010 — Deutscher Ring v OHIM (Deutscher Ring Sachversicherungs-AG)

(Case T-209/10)

(2010/C 179/92)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Deutscher Ring Sachversicherungs-AG (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by A. Busse, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 11 March 2010 in Case R 1290/2009-1 and register the trade mark applied for; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 11 March 2010 in Case R 1290/2009-1 and register the trade mark applied for; and

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘Deutscher Ring Sachversicherungs-AG’ for services in Class 36.

Decision of the Examiner: Rejection of the application

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, (1) since the Community trade mark concerned is distinctive and not merely descriptive.

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

---
§ 154.103 Composition of tariff. ( a ) The tariff must contain sections, in the following order: A table of contents, a preliminary statement, a uniform resource locator for the Internet address of a map of the system, currently effective rates, composition of rate schedules, general terms and conditions, form of service agreement, and an index of customers.
( b ) Rate schedules must be grouped according to class and numbered serially within each group, using letters before the serial number to indicate the class of service. For example: FT-1, FT-2 may be used for firm transportation service; IT-1, IT-2 may be used for interruptible transportation service; X-1, X-2 may be used for schedules for which special exception has been obtained.
[Order 582, 60 FR 52996, Oct. 11, 1995, as amended by Order 801, 79 FR 75050, Dec. 17, 2014]
# C_2007015EN.01000102.xml

| 23.1.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 15/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 15/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3958 — Arcadis/Dura Vermeer/Imtech/Asset Rail/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 15/02)

On 22 December 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in Dutch and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M3958. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M3958. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE PILOT
NETWORK SERVICES, INC. FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,167
<SECURITIES>                                     1,930
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,479
<ALLOWANCES>                                       217
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,094
<PP&E>                                          30,335
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,485
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,457
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,907
<BONDS>                                          4,600
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,936
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    29,457
<SALES>                                          7,130
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,130
<CGS>                                            7,379
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,379
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,955
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (37)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (5,241)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (5,241)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.38)


</TABLE>
More TSD's 

 Bill Maxwell 

 to: Cortney_Higgins 

 12/01/2011 12:20 PM 

 Cc: RobertJ Wayland 

 

Cortney -- 

Here are some additional MATS TSDs. 

The Emissions Inventory TSD from MATS Proposal was not changed for final: 

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/emch/index.html#toxics 

Thanks. 

Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt 

Bill Maxwell 

Energy Strategies Group 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

U.S. EPA Mail Code D243-01 

109 T.W. Alexander Drive 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

Phone: 919-541-5430 

FAX: 919-541-5450 

MATS_EFs_CaseStudies_CurrentBaseEI.pdf 

EGU Hg Speciation Profiles for CAMR.pdf 

Emis_overview_memo_MATSfinal.pdf
### §1614. Repealed. Pub. L. 96–221, title VI, §616(b), Mar. 31, 1980, 94 Stat. 182

Section, Pub. L. 90–321, title I, §115, as added Pub. L. 93–495, title IV, §413(a), Oct. 28, 1974, 88 Stat. 1520, related to liability of assignees. See section 1641 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective on expiration of two years and six months after Mar. 31, 1980, with all regulations, forms, and clauses required to be prescribed to be promulgated at least one year prior to such effective date, and allowing any creditor to comply with any amendments, in accordance with the regulations, forms, and clauses prescribed by the Board prior to such effective date, see section 625 of Pub. L. 96–221, set out as an Effective Date of 1980 Amendment note under section 1602 of this title.
§ 122.1 Definitions. The following words, when used in the regulations in this part 122, shall be construed, respectively, to mean: ( a ) *Department.* The U.S. Department of Agriculture.
( b ) *Secretary.* “Secretary” means the Secretary of Agriculture of the United States, or any officer or employee of the Department to whom authority has heretofore been delegated, or to whom authority may hereafter be delegated, to act in his stead.
( c ) *Administrator.* The Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, United States Department of Agriculture, or any person authorized to act for the Administrator.
( d ) *Organisms.* All cultures or collections of organisms or their derivatives, which may introduce or disseminate any contagious or infectious disease of animals (including poultry).
( e ) *Vectors.* All animals (including poultry) such as mice, pigeons, guinea pigs, rats, ferrets, rabbits, chickens, dogs, and the like, which have been treated or inoculated with organisms, or which are diseased or infected with any contagious, infectious, or communicable disease of animals or poultry or which have been exposed to any such disease.
( f ) *Permittee.* A person who resides in the United States or operates a business establishment within the United States, to whom a permit to import or transport organisms or vectors has been issued under the regulations.
( g ) *Person.* Any individual, firm, partnership, corporation, company, society, association, or other organized group of any of the foregoing, or any agent, officer, or employee of any thereof.
[31 FR 81, Jan. 5, 1966, as amended at 57 FR 30899, July 13, 1992]
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Michael Wayne Newberry, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 11294;

Fourth District

September 10, 1971.

Morton Zwick, Director of Defender Project, of Chicago, (Frederick F. Cohn, of counsel,) for appellant.

Basil G. Greanias, State’s Attorney, of Decatur, for the People.

Mr. JUSTICE MILLS,

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is an appeal with little, if any, merit — reflective of the ever increasing volume of like cases that are flooding our reviewing courts.

Defendant and his partner were indicted for burglary. Both were represented by the same self-employed attorney, both entered pleas of guilty and both requested probation. His co-defendant was granted probation, but Newberry was not. He received 1-10 years in the penitentiary.

First: Newberry contends that the indictment was void because it failed to allege legal ownership. The indictment recited that defendants *“* *** entered a building of Decatur School District No. 61, To-wit: The boiler room of Lakeview High School * * This identical question, in a burglary case on all-fours, was disposed of in *People v. Furman,*26 Ill.2d 334, 186 N.E.2d 262. That opinion clearly controls here.

Second: Defendant maintains he did not have effective counsel at the probation hearing because his attorney “argued forcefully to secure *252probation for the co-defendant” but “took a position of ambivalence” toward him. We comprehend no purpose to be served by reciting at length from the record in order to minutely demonstrate the hollowness of such a charge. It will suffice to relate that we have read in toto the record before us and find no ground whatsoever to support such argument.

The guilty plea of this defendant was properly taken by the trial court — and it was a “straight” plea, not “negotiated”. He had no prior promise as to sentence; he had no contract with the court; there was no *quid pro quo.*Defendant had violated a prior probation under an earlier conviction of attempted burglary, and to our view the trial judge had ample cause for the sentence here imposed.

Judgment affirmed.

SMITH, P. J., and CRAVEN, J., concur.
# C_2010328EN.01005501.xml

| 4.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/55

---

Action brought on 7 October 2010 — Bank Saderat Iran v Council

(Case T-494/10)

()

2010/C 328/84

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Bank Saderat Iran (Tehran, Iran) (represented by: S. Gadhia, S. Ashley, Solicitors, D. Anderson, QC and R. Blakeley, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | annul paragraph 5 of Table B of the Annex to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2010 (1) in so far as it relates to the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul paragraph 5 of Table B of the Annex to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2010 (1) in so far as it relates to the applicant;

1

| — | annul paragraph 7 of Table B of Annex II to Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP (2) in so far as it relates to the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul paragraph 7 of Table B of Annex II to Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP (2) in so far as it relates to the applicant;

2

| — | order the Council to pay the costs of the application. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council to pay the costs of the application.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In the present case the applicant seeks the partial annulment of Council Implementing Regulation No 668/2010 and of Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP in so far as the applicant is included on the list of natural and legal persons, entities and bodies whose funds and economic resources are frozen in accordance with this provision.

The three pleas in law relied on by the applicant are identical or similar to the first, second and fifth pleas relied on in Case T-492/10 Melli Bank v Council.

Melli Bank

Council

---

(1)  Council implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2010 of 26 July 2010 implementing Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 concerning restrictive measures against Iran, OJ 2010 L 195, p. 25

1

(2)  Council Decision of 26 July 2010 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Common Position 2007/140/CFSP, OJ 2010 L 195, p. 39

2

---