alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(39 South. 972.)

No. 15,785.

#### STATE v. RHODES et al.

(Dec. 4, 1905.)

Gaming — Owning and Maintaining Pool-booms.

The defense that the prosecution cannot be maintained because Act No. 128, p. 292, of 1904, on which it is based, is unconstitutional, null, and void, for the reason “that it does not define the crime pretended to be denounced therein, nor is the same defined by any act of the state of Louisiana,” is not well grounded. The decision of the Supreme Court in State v. Maloney (No. 15,576) 39 South. 539, ante, p. 497, is affirmed.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

Appeal from Criminal District Court, Parish of Orleans; Joshua G. Baker, Judge.

Herbert A. Rhodes and Thomas Hickey were convicted of being the owners and proprietors of a poolroom, and appeal.

Affirmed.

John Joseph Reilley, for appellant. Walter Guión, Atty. Gen., James Porter Parker, Dist. Atty., and Samuel Alexander Montgomery, Asst. Dist. Atty. (Lewis Guión, of counsel), for the State.

Statement of the Case.

NICHOLLS, J.

The defendants were tried and convicted upon an information charging them with being the owners and proprietors' of a certain poolroom, at the place bearing the municipal number 637 Commercial Place, in the parish of Orleans, and did unlawfully then and there establish, open, and operate and conduct the same in their said capacity of owners and proprietors thereof.

They were each sentenced to pay a fine of $305, and in default thereof to imprisonment in the parish prison for four months. They have appealed.

Opinion.

Defendants had moved in arrest of judgment that Act No. 128, p. 292, of 1904, the violation of which was charged against them was unconstitutional, null, and void, for the reason that the said statute does not define the crime pretended to be denounced therein, nor is the same defined nor designated by any act or law of the state of Louisiana, for that the elements necessary to constitute the pretended offense sought to be denounced and the nature and cause of the accusation are left to the inference of uncertainty and doubt, for which the said statute is repugnant to and in violation of article 10 of the Constitution of 1898.

They prayed that the sentence of the court be arrested and that by the court here they be dismissed and discharged from the said premises in the said information specified.

The matter was overruled and judgment entered. They appealed.

The question submitted to us in this ease was raised and has just been decided by us in the case of State v. Maloney (No. 15,-576) 39 South. 539.1 That decision governs and controls the present one.

For the reasons therein assigned, it is hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment appealed from be, and the same is, hereby affirmed.

1

 Ante, p. 497.
### §§4201 to 4204. Repealed. Pub. L. 102–555, §4, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4166

Section 4201, Pub. L. 98–365, title I, §101, July 17, 1984, 98 Stat. 451, related to Congressional findings for chapter.

Section 4202, Pub. L. 98–365, title I, §102, July 17, 1984, 98 Stat. 452, related to Congressional declaration of purpose of chapter.

Section 4203, Pub. L. 98–365, title I, §103, July 17, 1984, 98 Stat. 452, related to Federal policy concerning acquisition and dissemination of remote-sensing data, availability of civilian unenhanced remote-sensing data, and commercialization of remote-sensing space systems with governmental retention of essentially public service functions.

Section 4204, Pub. L. 98–365, title I, §104, July 17, 1984, 98 Stat. 452, related to definitions for chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 98–365, §1, July 17, 1984, 98 Stat. 451, which provided that such Act was to be cited as the "Land Remote-Sensing Commercialization Act of 1984", was repealed by Pub. L. 102–555, §4, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4166.
Sheet: Sheet1

          USDA-RUS

BORROWER AND LOAN DESIGNATION

CUT-OFF DATE

  LOAN  BUDGET  ANALYSIS

ITEM  

   B.  PRIMARY  BUDGET  PURPOSES

TOTAL BUDGET

DISTRIBUTION

TRANSMISSION

GENERATION

 HEADQUARTERS

ACQUISITION

ALL OTHER

PURPOSES

A.    

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

C.

1.

Balance in Reserve Including Funds

Under Conditional Agreement

(Covers WOI's thru

 19

, and

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Special Equipment thru

 19

, and

Submitted to RUS.)

2.

LESS:  Total of WOI's and Special

be submitted to RUS for approval

for advance, up until cut-off date -

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

attach list.  Construction must be

completed.)

3.

Loan funds which must be applied

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

     D.  PROJECTS  IN  PROGRESS*

ESTIMATED

        PRIOR APPROVALS

NET COST

BUDGET PURPOSE

PROJECT CODE

PROJECT COST

        FOR ADVANCE

SHOWN ON FORM 740C

(1)

(2)

(3)

        (4)

(5)

X

XXXXXXXX

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

  GENERAL FIELD REPRESENTATIVE

DATE

(Computer generated form - version 2, 12/96)
§ 154.201 Filing requirements. In addition to the requirements of subparts A and B of this part, the following must be included with the filing of any tariff, executed service agreement, or part thereof, that changes or supersedes any tariff, contract, or part thereof, on file with the Commission. ( a ) A list in the transmittal letter of the tariff sheets or sections being revised and a marked version of the sheets or sections to be changed or superseded showing additions and deletions. New numbers and text must be marked by either highlight, background shading, bold, or underline. Deleted text and numbers must be indicated by strike-through. Only those revisions appropriately designated and marked constitute the filing. Revisions to unmarked portions of the rate schedule or tariff are not considered part of the filing nor will any acceptance of the filing by the Commission constitute acceptance of such unmarked changes.
( b ) Documentation whether in the form of workpapers, or otherwise, sufficiently detailed to support the company's proposed change. ( 1 ) The documentation must include but is not limited to the schedules, workpapers, and supporting documentation required by these rules and regulations and the Commission's orders.
( 2 ) All rate changes in the filing must be supported by step-by-step mathematical calculations and sufficient written narrative to allow the Commission and interested parties to duplicate the company's calculations.
( 3 ) Any data or summaries included in the filing purporting to reflect the books of account must be supported by accounting workpapers setting forth all necessary particulars from which an auditor may readily verify that such data are in agreement with the company's books of account. All statements, schedules, and workpapers must be prepared in accordance with the classifications of the Commission's Uniform System of Accounts. Workpapers in support of all adjustments, computations, and other information, properly indexed and cross-referenced to the filing and other workpapers, must be available for Commission examination.
( 4 ) Where a rate, cost, or volume is derived from another rate, cost, or volume, the derivation must be shown mathematically and be accompanied by a written narrative sufficient to allow the Commission and interested parties to duplicate the calculations. If the derivation is due to a load factor adjustment, application of a percentage, or other adjusting factor, the pipeline must also note or explain the origin of the adjusting factor.
( 5 ) Where workpapers show progressive calculations, any discontinuity between one working paper and another must be explained.
[Order 582, 60 FR 52996, Oct. 11, 1995, as amended by Order 714, 73 FR 57534, Oct. 3, 2008]
### UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION III 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

Mr. David K. Paylor, Director Virginia Department ofEnvironmental Quality 629 East Main Street Richmond, Virginia 23219

# tw**~J/** Dear Direct / 1•v• : 

### NOV 12 2015

By letter and enclosures dated June 16, 2015, the Virginia Department ofEnvironmental Quality (VADEQ) submitted to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) an annual ambient air monitoring network plan in accordance with the regulatory requirements of40 CFR Part 58 -Ambient Air Quality Surveillance. Based on our review, EPA approves VADEQ's June 16, 2015 annual ambient air monitoring network plan on the basis that the plan meets the requirements of40 CFR Part 58.10.

Additionally, 40 CFR Section 58.11(c) requires any changes to the air monitoring network or design ofthe following air monitoring systems be approved by the EPA Administrator: a) Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Systems (PAMS) b) Particulate Matter Speciation Trends Network (STN) c) The National Core MonitoringNetwork (NCore)

EPA determined that VADEQ's June 16,2015 annual ambient air monitoring network plan does not require approval from the EPA Administrator because there were no changes to any ofthe air monitoring systems listed above.

Ifyou have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me or have your staffcontact Mr. Brian Hamilton, EPA's Virginia Liaison, at (215) 814-5497. For questions regarding this approval action, your staffmay contact Mr. David L. Arnold, Acting Director, Air Protection Division, at (215) 814-2172.

cc: Mr. Mike Dowd, VADEQ Shawn M. Garvin Regional Administrator



## 0 Printedon 100% recycled/recyclablepaper with 100%post-consumer fiber andprocess chlorine free. Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474
SERVED: DECEMBER 17, 2013 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

LINCOLN PARK AVIATION 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2013-0719 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2011EA250037) has been assigned 

to Administrative Law Judge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications 

regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other 

persons on the attached Service List. 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence A venue, S. W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

ONE COPY 

Zachery M. Berman, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel 

Eastern Region 

Fedqral Aviation Administration . 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

TEL: 718-553-3258 

FAJ{: 718-995-5699 

Frank R. Galella, Respo,ndent 's Representative 

Lincoln Park Aviation, Respondent 

425 Beaverbrook Road 

Lincoln Park, NJ 07035 

TEL: 973-633-0450 

,, 

·Hortorable Judge J.E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 

FAJ{: 202-366-7536 

FDMS No. FAA-2013-0719 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, 

DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. ' 

-2-
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

 

**Consent of Independent Registered PublicAccounting Firm**

 

We have issued our reports dated September2, 2005, accompanying the consolidated financial statements and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of CellStar Corporation for the year endedNovember 30, 2004. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of CellStar Corporation on Form S-8 (File No. 333-121590, effective December 23, 2004, File No. 333-89298, effective May 29, 2002,File No. 333-77415, effective April 30, 1999, File No. 333-23381, effective October 3, 1997 and File No. 33-87754, effective December 23, 1994). 

 

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP 

 

Dallas Texas 

September 2, 2005
2014 Livestock Reinsurance Data 

National Totals 

As of 10/2018 

Gross Liability Gross Premium Gross Indemnity Retained Liability Retained Premium Retained Ind

1,041,199,729 22,803,768 10,509,136 402,727,048 8,638,934 3,6

Footnote: Amounts shown are for policies that have reached the Premium Billing Date according to the actuarial documents. 

Page 1 of 1
# C_2007005EN.01000301.xml

| 10.1.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 5/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.1.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 5/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

9 January 2007

(2007/C 5/02)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3018 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 155,26 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4538 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67025 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0960 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6127 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 92,53 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2555 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5784 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,600 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 253,00 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6979 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8599 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,3836 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 34,335 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8680 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6675 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5327 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1496 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8796 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0003 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 221,87 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,3850 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,1605 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3675 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 761,76 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5667 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,294 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,4490 |
| THB | Thai baht | 46,754 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3018

JPY

Japanese yen

155,26

DKK

Danish krone

7,4538

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67025

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0960

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6127

ISK

Iceland króna

92,53

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2555

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5784

CZK

Czech koruna

27,600

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

253,00

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6979

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8599

RON

Romanian leu

3,3836

SKK

Slovak koruna

34,335

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8680

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6675

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5327

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1496

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8796

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0003

KRW

South Korean won

1 221,87

ZAR

South African rand

9,3850

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,1605

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3675

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 761,76

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5667

PHP

Philippine peso

63,294

RUB

Russian rouble

34,4490

THB

Thai baht

46,754

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# C_2011186EN.01000802.xml

| 25.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 186/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 186/8

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 28 April 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Corte d’appello di Trento — Italy) — Criminal proceedings against Hassen El Dridi alias Karim Soufi

(Case C-61/11 PPU) (1)

1

(Area of freedom, security and justice - Directive 2008/115/EC - Return of illegally staying third-country nationals - Articles 15 and 16 - National legislation providing for a prison sentence for illegally staying third-country nationals in the event of refusal to obey an order to leave the territory of a Member State - Compatibility)

2011/C 186/14

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Corte d’appello di Trento

Party in the main proceedings

Party in the main proceedings

Hassen El Dridi alias Karim Soufi

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Corte di Apello di Trento — Interpretation of Articles 15 and 16 of Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals (OJ 2008 L 348, p. 98) — Return of illegally staying third-country nationals — Conditions of detention for the purpose of removal — Direct applicability — National legislation providing for a sentence of up to four years’ imprisonment for a third-country national who, after a removal order has been issued, continues to stay illegally in national territory

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals, in particular Articles 15 and 16 thereof, must be interpreted as precluding a Member State’s legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which provides for a sentence of imprisonment to be imposed on an illegally staying third-country national on the sole ground that he remains, without valid grounds, on the territory of that State, contrary to an order to leave that territory within a given period.

---

(1)  OJ C 113, 9.4.2011.

1

---
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1250,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with thequarterly report of Power3 Medical Products, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSBfor the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John P. Burton,Chief  Financial Officer  of the Company,  certify,  to the best of my knowledge,  pursuant to18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

The Report fully compileswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

The information containedin the  Report  fairly presents,  in all  material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  | November 14,  2005 | /s/ John P.  Burton                 |   |
|--------|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                    | John P. Burton                      |
|   |                    | Chief  Financial Officer       |
|   |                    | Power3 Medical  Products, Inc. |

 

1

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7279

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

STANLEY HICKMAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CR-93-144-5-3-BO)

Submitted: October 6, 1998 Decided: October 23, 1998

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stanley Hickman, Appellant Pro Se. David Paul Folmar, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Hickman, No. CR-93-144-5-3-BO (E.D.N.C.

July 10, 1998). We note that even if we assume, as Appellant

argues, that his conviction became final on October 7, 1997, the

date on which the Supreme Court denied his petition for a writ of

certiorari, his § 2255 motion nevertheless was untimely filed. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### §2664. Model construction standards and techniques

The Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency shall develop model construction standards and techniques for controlling radon levels within new buildings. To the maximum extent possible, these standards and techniques should be developed with the assistance of organizations involved in establishing national building construction standards and techniques. The Administrator shall make a draft of the document containing the model standards and techniques available for public review and comment. The model standards and techniques shall provide for geographic differences in construction types and materials, geology, weather, and other variables that may affect radon levels in new buildings. The Administrator shall make final model standards and techniques available to the public by June 1, 1990. The Administrator shall work to ensure that organizations responsible for developing national model building codes, and authorities which regulate building construction within States or political subdivisions within States, adopt the Agency's model standards and techniques.

(Pub. L. 94–469, title III, §304, as added Pub. L. 100–551, §1(a), Oct. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 2756.)
# C_2007055EN.01000101.xml

| 10.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

9 March 2007

(2007/C 55/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3155 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 154,28 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4488 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68060 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2933 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6137 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 88,84 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1120 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5794 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,168 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 251,08 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7079 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8828 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,3799 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 34,058 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8703 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6889 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5469 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2799 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9085 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0071 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 244,13 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,7263 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,1879 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3570 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 071,03 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6095 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,762 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,4560 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,969 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3155

JPY

Japanese yen

154,28

DKK

Danish krone

7,4488

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68060

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2933

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6137

ISK

Iceland króna

88,84

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1120

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5794

CZK

Czech koruna

28,168

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

251,08

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7079

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8828

RON

Romanian leu

3,3799

SKK

Slovak koruna

34,058

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8703

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6889

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5469

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2799

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9085

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0071

KRW

South Korean won

1 244,13

ZAR

South African rand

9,7263

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,1879

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3570

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 071,03

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6095

PHP

Philippine peso

63,762

RUB

Russian rouble

34,4560

THB

Thai baht

42,969

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---