alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 157.38 Pre-approval procedures.

No later than 90 days prior to providing the notice of open season required by § 157.34(a), a prospective applicant must file, for Commission approval, a detailed plan for conducting an open season in conformance with this subpart. The prospective applicant's plan shall include the proposed notice of open season. Upon receipt of a request for such a determination, the Secretary of the Commission shall issue a notice of the request, which will then be published in the Federal Register. The notice shall establish a date on which comments from interested persons are due and a date, which shall be within 60 days of receipt of the prospective applicant's request unless otherwise directed by the Commission, by which the Commission will act on the proposed plan.

[Order 2005-A, 70 FR 35026, June 16, 2005]
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 10.47

                               THOMAS M. STEINBERG
                             Tisch Family Interests
                          667 Madison Avenue, 7th Floor
                               New York, NY 10021


Mr. Marc I. Perkins, CEO
Gunther International, Ltd.
One Winnenden Rd.
Norwich, CT 06360

Dear Mr. Perkins:

In accordance with a $500,000 promissory note dated April 4, 2000 by and between
Gunther Partners, LLC (the "Lender") and Gunther International, Ltd. (the
"Company"), the Lender has the right to demand payment at any time after May 4,
2000.

In the event the Company is unable to meet the payment obligation upon demand,
in accordance with the promissory note, the Lender will extend the payment term
until a time as the Company's cash flows will permit payment, but no later than
April 1, 2001.

In addition, the Lender will commit to lending the Company an additional
$500,000 in the event the Company's cash flows, in the opinion of management and
the Lender, require such an amount. It would be expected that the terms of any
additional funding are on a basis similar to previous debt agreements between
the parties. This commitment expires April 1, 2001.

Both parties agree that any deferred payment or additional funding are on an
"as-needed" basis and any commitments herein expire on April 1, 2001.


Sincerely,

/s/ Thomas M. Steinberg

Thomas M. Steinberg
President
Tisch Family Interests
# C_2011331EN.01002201.xml

| 12.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/22

---

Order of the General Court of 9 September 2011 — Biodes v OHIM — Manasul Internacional (BIESUL)

(Case T-597/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Revocation of the decision of the Board of Appeal - Cessation of existence of dispute - No need to adjudicate)

2011/C 331/43

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Biodes, SL (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: E. Manresa Medina, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: V. Melgar, agent)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: V. Melgar, agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Manasul Internacional, SL

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 September 2010 (Case R 1519/2009-1) concerning opposition proceedings between Manasul Internacional, SL and Biodes, SL.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no further need to adjudicate on the present action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no further need to adjudicate on the present action.

| 2. | The Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)(OHIM) shall bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)(OHIM) shall bear the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 80, 12.3.2011.

1

---
ON YOUR WAY TO PRACTICE...

See if she has ever been offered alcohol.

Show your child you care and help build accountability by setting clear and 

consistent expectations regarding alcohol use. For tips on how—and when—

to begin the conversation, visit 

www.underagedrinking.samhsa.gov

#TalkTheyHearYou PEP20-03-01-023
Editorial Note on Part 900
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

§ 900.128 What funding shall the Secretary provide in a construction contract? The Secretary shall provide an amount under a construction contract that reflects an overall fair and reasonable price to the parties. These costs include: ( a ) The reasonable costs to the Indian tribe or tribal organization of performing the contract, taking into consideration the terms of the contract and the requirements of the Act and any other applicable law;
( b ) The costs of preparing the contract proposal and supporting cost data; and
( c ) The costs associated with auditing the general and administrative costs of the tribal organization associated with the management of the construction contract; and
( d ) If the Indian tribe or tribal organization is submitting a fixed-price construction contract: ( 1 ) The reasonable costs to the Indian tribe or tribal organization for general administration incurred in connection with the project that is the subject of the contract;
( 2 ) The ability of the contractor that carries out the construction contract to make a reasonable profit, taking into consideration the risks associated with carrying out the contract, local market conditions, and other relevant considerations including but not limited to contingency.
( 3 ) In establishing a contract budget for a construction project, the Secretary is not required to identify separately the components described in paragraph (d) (1) and (d) (2) of this sections.
#### CLIFFORD MELROE, Plaintiff and Respondent, *v.*TERESA M. DOYLE, Connie J. Griffin, Steven E. Scheitlin, Susan M. Scheitlin, Daniel J. Scheitlin, Edward E. Scheitlin, Jr., Michael J. Scheitlin, and Vaeda G. Scheitlin, Defendants and Appellants.

No. 89-289.

Submitted on Briefs Aug. 17, 1989.

Decided Nov. 7, 1989.

781 P.2d 1134.

*525John H. Jardine, Jardine & Grauman, Whitehall, for defendants and appellants.

William M. Kebe, Jr. & Carol L. McGary, Johnson, Skakles & Kebe, Butte, for plaintiff and respondent.

JUSTICE HUNT

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

The defendants appeal from an order of the District Court of the Second Judicial District, Silver Bow County, denying their motion for change of venue. We affirm.

The sole issue raised on appeal is whether the District Court erred in denying defendants’ motion to move the place of trial from the county in which four of the eight defendants resided to the county in which the contract relied upon in the complaint was to be performed.

Plaintiff, Clifford Melroe, brought this action for breach of contract and unjust enrichment in Silver Bow County, the residence of four of the eight defendants. The defendants moved for change of venue, claiming that Madison County was the proper place for trial as it was the county in which the contract was to be performed. The District Court denied the motion. The defendants appealed.

The statute governing change of venue for contract actions provides in pertinent part:

> “(1) The proper place of trial for actions upon contracts is *either:*

> “(a) the county in which the defendants, or any of them, reside at the commencement of the action; or

> “(b) the county in which the contract was to be performed. (Emphasis added.)”

Section 25-2-121, MCA.

The statute reiterates the long-standing rule that, in contract actions, the plaintiff may elect to bring suit in either the county of the defendant’s residence or the county of contract performance. Either county is the proper place for trial. When a suit may properly be commenced in more than one county and the plaintiff files in one of the permissible counties, the defendant may not change .the venue of the action to a different county, even if the the county preferred by the defendant is also a proper place for trial. Section 25-2-115, MCA. See also *Petersen v. Tucker*(1987), 228 Mont. 393, 396, 742 P.2d 483, 484-85.

In the present case, the plaintiff could have properly filed suit in either Silver Bow County or Madison County. The plaintiff *526elected to commence the action in Silver Bow County. Such election was proper. The District Court did not err in denying the defendants’ motion for change of venue.

Affirmed.

CHIEF JUSTICE TURNAGE and JUSTICES SHEEHY, Mc-DONOUGH and WEBER concur.
```

[111th Congress Private Law 2]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 1]]

Private Law 111-2
111th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 For the relief of Hotaru Nakama Ferschke. <<NOTE: Dec. 22, 2010 -  [S. 
                                1774]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR HOTARU NAKAMA FERSCHKE.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Hotaru Nakama Ferschke shall 
be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of 
status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence 
upon filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under 
section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Hotaru Nakama Ferschke enters the 
United States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), 
she shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, 
if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under 
section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an immigrant 
visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed with 
appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Hotaru Nakama Ferschke, the 
Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, 
during the current or next following fiscal year, the total number of 
immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of the 
alien's birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality 
Act or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas that are made 
available to natives of the country of the alien's birth under section 
202(e) of such Act.
    (e) PAYGO.--The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of 
complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go-Act of 2010, shall be 
determined by reference to the latest statement titled ``Budgetary 
Effects of PAYGO Legislation'' for this Act, submitted for printing in 
the Congressional Record by the Chairman of the Senate Budget

[[Page 2]]

Committee, provided that such statement has been submitted prior to the 
vote on passage.

    Approved December 22, 2010.
```
```

[113th Congress Public Law 259]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 128 STAT. 2928]]

Public Law 113-259
113th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 601 West Baker Road in Baytown, Texas, as the ``Specialist Keith Erin 
   Grace, Jr. Memorial Post Office''. <<NOTE: Dec. 18, 2014 -  [H.R. 
                                4651]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SPECIALIST KEITH ERIN GRACE, JR. MEMORIAL POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 601 West Baker Road in Baytown, Texas, shall be known as the 
``Specialist Keith Erin Grace, Jr. Memorial Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referenced 
to subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Specialist 
Keith Erin Grace, Jr. Memorial Post Office''.

    Approved December 18, 2014.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4651:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 160 (2014):
            Sept. 8, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 15, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
§ 50.4 Classification of cattle, bison, captive cervids, and other livestock as infected, exposed, or suspect. ( a ) Cattle, bison, and captive cervids are classified as infected with tuberculosis on the basis of an intradermal tuberculin test applied by a Federal, State, or an accredited veterinarian or by other diagnostic procedure approved in advance by the Administrator.
( b ) Cattle, bison, and captive cervids are classified as exposed to tuberculosis when such cattle, bison, and captive cervids ( 1 ) are part of a known infected herd, or
( 2 ) are found to have moved from an infected herd before the time infection was disclosed in such herd and after the time such herd had apparently become infected, or
( 3 ) are found to have been exposed by virtue of nursing a reactor dam: *Provided,* That cattle, bison, and captive cervids classified as exposed to tuberculosis shall be removed direct to slaughter.
( c ) Cattle and bison are classified as suspects for tuberculosis based on a positive response to an official tuberculin test, in accordance with the “Uniform Methods and Rules—Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication” (incorporated into the regulations by reference in part 77). Captive cervids are classified as suspects for tuberculosis in the same manner as cattle and bison.
( d ) The designated tuberculosis epidemiologist will determine whether livestock other than cattle, bison, or captive cervids are classified as exposed to tuberculosis by reason of association with an affected herd of cattle, bison, or captive cervids.
[40 FR 27009, June 26, 1975, as amended at 52 FR 39614, Oct. 23, 1987; 56 FR 36998, Aug. 2, 1991; 60 FR 37809, July 24, 1995; 63 FR 34264, June 24, 1998; 67 FR 7591, Feb. 20, 2002]
# C_2010195EN.01002802.xml

| 17.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 195/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 195/28

---

Action brought on 21 May 2010 — Telefónica v Commission

(Case T-228/10)

2010/C 195/44

Language of the case: Spain

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Telefónica, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J. Ruiz Calzado, M. Núñez Müller and J. Domínguez Pérez, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | annul Article 1(1) of the Decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Article 1(1) of the Decision;

| — | order the Commission to pay all the costs arising from the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay all the costs arising from the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The decision against which these proceedings are brought is the same as that contested in Cases T-219/10 Autogrill España v Commission; T-221/10 IBERDROLA v Commission; and T-227/10 Banco Santander v Commission.

Autogrill España

Commission

IBERDROLA

Commission

Banco Santander

Commission

The pleas in law and the principal arguments are similar to those relied on in those cases.

---
§ 93.218 Import permits and applications for inspection for poultry. ( a ) For poultry intended for importation from Mexico, the importer shall first apply for and obtain from APHIS an import permit as provided in § 93.204.
( b ) For poultry intended for importation into the United States from Mexico, the importer or his or her agent shall deliver to the veterinary inspector at the port of entry an application, in writing, for inspection, so that the veterinary inspector and customs representatives may make mutually satisfactory arrangements for the orderly inspection of the poultry.
[55 FR 31495, Aug. 2, 1990. Redesignated and amended at 62 FR 56012, 56016, Oct. 28, 1997]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>     5
<CIK>         0001063293
<NAME>        AMCI INTERNATIONAL, INC.
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            13907
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          1471
<OTHER-SE>                                      (15378)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  4266
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (4266)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.00)
        

</TABLE>
#### § 317.9 Labeling of equine products.

The immediate containers of any equine products shall be labeled to show the kinds of animals from which derived when the products are sold, transported, offered for sale or transportation or received for transportation in commerce.
### §282. Repealed. Pub. L. 100–418, title V, §5113, Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1432

Section, act May 14, 1930, ch. 275, §1, 46 Stat. 327, related to establishment and purpose of a national hydraulic laboratory and studies of Federal and State projects related thereto.
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

Rural Development Announces Rupe as Acting Rural Utilities Service 

Administrator

 WASHINGTON, March 26, 2019 – Acting Assistant to the Secretary for Rural Development Joel Baxley 

today announced Chad Rupe will serve as the Acting Administrator for USDA’s Rural Utilities Service. He 

will start on April 1. 

 Rupe has served as USDA Rural Development State Director of Wyoming since 2017. During his tenure 

there, he has been a leader for rural broadband, serving on the Rural Development State Directors Broadband 

Working Group and assisting state government with efforts to deploy broadband in rural Wyoming. Rupe has 

also championed rural water utilities projects and financing for sustainable electric infrastructure investments. 

 Prior to being appointed State Director, Rupe worked in Rural Development’s Community Programs in 

Wyoming. In that role, he helped underwrite and manage more than $13 million in Water and Environmental 

Program direct loans and $4.75 million in grants. Rupe spent nearly 15 years in the banking industry,

specializing in commercial lending in Wyoming. He began his service to our country in the United States Army.

#
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Seeks Applications for Grants to Offset High Energy Costs in Rural Areas

WASHINGTON, May 5, 2021 – U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Deputy Under Secretary for Rural 

Development Justin Maxson today announced that USDA is seeking applications for grants to offset high 

energy costs in rural areas. 

USDA is making the funding available through the High Energy Cost Grant program. This program helps state 

and local governments and nonprofit agencies acquire, construct, extend, upgrade, or otherwise improve energy 

generation, transmission or distribution facilities. Grants may also be used to install on-grid and off-grid 

renewable energy systems and to make energy efficiency improvements. 

Eligible projects must be in communities where the average residential home energy expenditure is at least 275 

percent of the national average. USDA expects to award up to $10 million for Fiscal Year 2021. 

Paper applications must be postmarked and mailed, shipped or sent overnight no later than July 6, 2021. 

Electronic applications must be submitted to grants.gov by midnight Eastern Standard Time on July 6, 2021. 

### 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender.