alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 22.24 Alternative Dispute Resolution [Rule 24]. ( a ) *Docketed appeals.* The Board considers Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) to be an efficient way to timely resolve many contract disputes, and therefore encourages the parties to use ADR as an effective means to resolve their contract dispute. ADR with Board participation is available at the initiative of the Board or upon the joint motion of both parties. Guidelines, procedures, and requirements for implementing ADR will be prescribed by agreement of the parties and the Board. Ordinarily, ADR will be performed by a Board member, designated by the Chairman of the Board, that is not one of the three panel members deciding the dispute.
( b ) *Other matters.* Upon request and in the Board's discretion, the Board can make an ADR neutral available for an ADR proceeding, even if the contracting officer's decision has not been issued or is not contemplated. Such a request should be directed to the Chairman of the Board.
# C_2012073EN.01002503.xml

| 10.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 73/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 73/25

---

Order of the President of the Court of 25 November 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação de Guimarães — Portugal) — Maria das Dores Meira da Silva v Zurich — Companhia de Seguros SA

(Case C-13/11) (1)

1

2012/C 73/45

Language of the case: Portuguese

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 95, 26.3.2011.

1

---
### 54 | Page 

# CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have, on November 22, 2011 , served via United States Postal Service, the foregoing Application of

Tiara Air

(DOT

- OST Docket ____________) on the following persons:

Gary F. Kennedy Dimitri Iturria, General Manager

SVP & General Counsel Flying Boat, Inc.

American Airlines D/B/A/Chalk’s International Airlines

4333 Amon Center Blvd. 1000 McArthur Cause way

MD5675 Miami, Fl 33133

Fort Worth, Tx 76155

Air Pony Express

Jeffery Smisek 1630 NW 121 Ave.

President Pembroke Pines, FL 33026

Continental Airlines

Dept HQSGV David Hackett

PO BOX 4607 President & CEO

Houston, Tx 7721 0 Gulfstream International Airlines

1815 Griffin Road

Richard B. Hirst Suite 400

SVP and General Counsel Dania, FL 33004

Delta Air Lines, Inc.

P.O. Box 20706 Daniel P. Garton, President

Atlanta, GA 30320

- 6001 American Eagle Ai rlines

Box 61915 MD 5475

DFW Airport, TX 75261

Legal Department

Northwest Airlines David G. Basset

5101 Northwest Drive Amerijet International, Inc.

St Paul, MN 55111 2800 S. Andrews Avenue

Ft Lauderdale, Fl 33316

Bru ce H. Rabinovitz

United Airlines Joseph R. O’Gorman

Wilmer Hale President & CEO

1875 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Evergreen International Airlines, Inc.

Washington, DC 20037 3850 Three Mile Lane

McMinville, OR 97128

Teri Plummer McClure

SVP and General Counsel Courtney E. Felts

UPS World Headquarters Senior Attny Regulatory Affairs

55 Glenlake Parkway NE Federal Express Corporation

Atlanta, GA 30328 3620 Hacks Cross Road

Building B, 3 rd Floor

Stephen Johnson Memphis, TN 38125

US Airways

111 W. Rio Salado Parkway

Tempe, AZ 85281

### 55 | Page D. Ross Fischer

President and CEO

Miami Air International, Inc.

Box 660880

Miami, Fl 33266

Tony De Camillis, President

Planet Airways, Inc.

4700 Milenia Blvd. Ste 500

Or lando, FL 32839

Jacob M. Schoor

President & CEO

Spirit Airlines, Inc.

2800 Executive Way

Miramar, Fl 33025

U.S. Department of State

Office of Civil Aviation

Room 5531

EB/TRA/AN

800 Independence Ave. SW

Washington, DC 20591

James R. Jelinski

IFO Manager

FAA International Field Office

2895 SW 145 th Ave.

Suite 221

Miramar, Fl 33027



### Voice: (954) 763

- 4848

Email:ca @aviation

- professionals.com

C.A. Southerland

Representative for

TI ARA AIR N.V.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Kelsey, Petty and Senior Judge Bumgardner

RICHARD ROBINSON MEMORANDUM OPINION *

v. Record No. 1839

- 11

- 2 PER CURIAM FEBRUARY 14, 2012 DAVID EVERETT, INC. AND

STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION
(Richard Robinson, pro se , on briefs)

. (Kathryn Spruill Lingle; Midkiff, Muncie & Ross, P.C., on brief) , for appellee s

.

Richard Robinson appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission . On
appeal, he contends the commission (1) abused its discretion in refusing to consider new medical

evidence not presented to the deputy commissioner and finding such evidence did not constitute
newly discovered evidence , (2) erred in finding he unjustifiabl y refused light

- duty work,
(3) erred in finding he unjustifiably failed to market his residual work capacity, and (4) erred in
finding that Robinson was not denied due process. 1

We have reviewed the record and the commission ’ s opinion and find that this appeal is
without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final
opinion. See Robinson v. D avid Everett, Inc. , VWC File No. VA020

- 0000

- 3764 (Aug

. 12 , 2011). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1

- 413, this opinion is not designated for publication.

1 Although Robinson listed eight numbered assignments of error, they all relate to one of the four numbered assignments referenced in the fi rst paragraph of this opinion.- 2

- contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this Court and argument would not
aid the decisional process. See Code § 17. 1

- 403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed

.
#### § 54.21 Participation.

Any owner of a sheep or goat flock may apply to enter the Scrapie Free Flock Certification Program by sending a written request to a State scrapie certification board or to the Veterinary Services, Field Operations, AVIC responsible for the State involved. A notice containing a current list of flocks participating in the Scrapie Free Flock Certification Program, and the certification status of each flock, may be obtained from the APHIS website at *http://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal-health/scrapie.* A list of noncompliant flocks and a list of flocks that sold exposed animals that could not be traced may also be obtained from this site, and these lists may be obtained by writing to the National Scrapie Program Coordinator, Strategy and Policy, VS, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 43, Riverdale, MD 20737-1235.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0101)

[84 FR 11185, Mar. 25, 2019]
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 August 10, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Rocco B. CommissoRocco B. CommissoChairman and Chief Executive OfficerBy:
    /s/ Mark E. StephanMark E. StephanExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 23.2

               Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants


We have issued our report dated November 21, 2003, except for Note 6, as to
which the date is January 7, 2004, accompanying the consolidated financial
statements included in the Annual Report of Advanced Nutraceuticals, Inc. on
Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2003. We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statement for
Advanced Nutraceuticals, Inc. (the successor to Nutrition For Life
International, Inc.) on Form S-8 (File No. 33-99366, effective December 5,
1995).

/s/ Gelfond Hochstadt Pangburn, P.C.
----------------------
Gelfond Hochstadt Pangburn, P.C.
Denver, Colorado
January 12, 2004





<PAGE>
#### § 354.122 Condemnation on ante-mortem inspection.

Rabbits found in a dying condition on premises of an official plant shall be immediately destroyed and, together with any rabbits found dead on such premises, shall be disposed of in accordance with § 354.132. Rabbits plainly showing, on ante-mortem inspection, any disease or condition, that under §§ 354.129 to 354.131, inclusive, would cause condemnation of their carcasses on post-mortem inspection, shall be condemned. Rabbits which, on ante-mortem inspection, are condemned shall not be dressed, nor shall they be conveyed into any department of the plant where rabbit products are prepared or held. Rabbits which have been condemned on ante-mortem inspection and have been killed shall, under the supervision of an inspector of the Inspection Service, receive treatment as provided in § 354.132.
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 31, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-13-00625-CV

WILLIAM AND HOPE DADZIE, Appellants

V.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., AS TRUSTEE FOR THE CERTIFICATE 

HOLDERS OF MORGAN STANLEY ABS CAPITAL I INC. TRUST 2005-

WMC3 MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-

WMC3, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 2

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1018834

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellants filed a notice of appeal on July 19, 2013, seeking to appeal an 

order signed June 28, 2013, denying their motion to reduce the supersedeas bond 
2

amount set by the trial court. No record has been filed.

1

On July 31, 2013, the court reporter for this case advised the court that 

appellants are not appealing as indigent and they have not made payment 

arrangements for preparation of the record. On September 6, 2013, the county clerk 

advised the court that appellants have not made payment arrangements for 

preparation of the clerk’s record. Our records also reflect that appellants have not 

paid the appellate filing fee of $175.00. Therefore, on September 9, 2013, the court 

issued an order directing appellants to pay the appellate filing fee and to provide 

proof of payment for preparation of the record by September 25, 2013, or the 

appeal would be dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 5; 37.3(b). Appellants filed no 

response.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices McCally, Busby, and Wise.

 

1 While it appears that an order on a supersedeas bond would not be appealable in the absence of 

an appeal from the final judgment, see Tex. R. App. P. 24.2(a), we are unable to ascertain our 

jurisdiction over this appeal without a record.
Regulatory Evaluation 

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD 

ffyoumake changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update according~y. ff 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell. 

Estimated Costs: 

Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

(e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) 

Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost 

replacement) (include cost (labor + u.s. for U.S. Fleet Do not include oncondition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered 

and close-up) our) Products 

Inspection 2,3 12.0 '-I 1l .")( $0 )(, () 142 - Qu.:: S<l•l 

')U 

~ {).(If l} I){} O.•·J 

s v.OJ~ () ()() (l 'l 

0 (Ji (J( 'J.•') 

' 0 0( ll 

() t1C t),l 

'l ,J~ lrl I 

~~ nr [)I l' I'~J 

..: (, ()( t" ,., 

fl (1\ l}, l) !J 

r U llf (Ill n.u: 

n r1c 1 ur; U.1J0 

0 1

Jt (It) ' (\ oo 

11 r1c l_()(, .I Ill! 

'J,O( (F 

il ,,, I ,ll 

Po, 

1;1 I ' 

t It 

The known number of products in compliance: 0 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $27,905,840 

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $ 

On-Condition Costs: • 

Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product 

(e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour) 

replacement) testing, and closeup) 

*Repair 18.3 ., 1 •')') ·ll $0 

n liO I IJI\ 

'-. (·WI ) •lhi 

> ll l1 I '-. 1 I Hr 

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): * 18.3 hours per 
window as needed. Access/closure not included. Parts are supplied by operator. Cost per product is 

varies, depending on the number of window repair. 

Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? - ; 

YES*0 NO~ 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? ~ 

YES*0 NO~ 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.~· 

YESD NO~ 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? -

YES*0 NO~ 

*Explanation:
**UNITED
      STATES**


**SECURITIES
      AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION**


**Washington,
      D.C. 20549**





**FORM
      6-K**







**Report
      of Foreign Issuer**


**Pursuant
      to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of** **the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934**











**For
      the month of March, 2006**





**Commission
      File No. 1-9987**











B
      + H O C E A N C A R R I E R S L T D.


(Translation
      of registrant’s name into English)








3rdFloor,
      Par La Ville Place


**14
      Par-La-Ville Road**


**Hamilton
      HM JX Bermuda**


**(Address
      of principal executive offices)**








Indicate
      by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under
      cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.





Form
      20-F  X   Form
      40-F





Indicate
      by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted
      by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1):




Indicate
      by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted
      by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7):





Indicate
      by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this Form,
      the
      registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant
      to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.





Yes    No X







INFORMATION
      CONTAINED IN THIS FORM 6-K REPORT







Set
      forth
      herein as Exhibit 99.1 is a Press Release Announcing Results for the Fourth
      Quarterly Period and Year Ending December 31, 2005























**Signatures**








Pursuant
      to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
      has
      duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
      duly authorized.







Date  March
      22, 2006





B+H Ocean Carriers, Ltd.


/s/
      Michael S. Hudner


Chief
      Executive Officer
**Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 June 2012 —**
**Commission v Portugal**

**(Case C-223/11)**

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Environment — Directive 2000/60/EC — European Union water policy — River basin district management plans — Publication and notification to the Commission — None — Information and consultation of the public on the envisaged management plans — None

Actions for failure to fulfil obligations — Examination of the merits by the Court — Situation to be taken into consideration — Situation on expiry of the period laid down in the reasoned opinion (Art. 258 TFEU; European Parliament and Council Directive
2000/60) (see paras 16, 29)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Infringement of Articles 13(1), (2) and (6), 14(1)(c) and 15(1) of Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy (OJ 2000 L 327, p. 1) — River basin district management plans — Publication — Information and consultation of the public — Commission not notified of copy management plans. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Rules that, the Portuguese Republic, by failing within the prescribed period: |

–        to publish the national and international river basin district management plans;

–        to publish and to submit to the public, including users, for comment the envisaged river basin district management plans,
and

–        to send the European Commission the copies of those plans,

has failed to fulfil its obligations under, respectively, Article 13(6) of Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament
and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy, read in
conjunction with Article 13(1) and (2), Article 14(1)(c) and Article 15(1) of that directive;

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs. |
**For      Immediate Release**

| **Contact:** | Progenics                Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Richard                W. Krawiec, Ph.D.Vice                PresidentCorporate                Affairs(914)                789-2800rkrawiec@progenics.com |   |   |
|--------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|

**PROGENICS      EARNS $5 MILLION FROM WYETH FOR ACHIEVING METHYLNALTREXONE      MILESTONE**

**Tarrytown,      NY - October 25, 2006 - **

----

**Company      Profile**

**Progenics      Pharmaceuticals, Inc.**
*in      vivo*

***PROGENICS***
** **
***DISCLOSURE      NOTICE:***
* *
*The      information contained in this document is current as of October 25, 2006. This      press release contains forward-looking statements. Any statements contained      herein that are not statements of historical fact may be forward-looking      statements. When the Company uses the words ‘anticipates,’ ‘plans,’ ‘expects’and similar expressions, it is identifying forward-looking statements. Such      forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties which may cause      the      Company’s actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different      from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements. Such factors      include, among others, the uncertainties associated with product development,      the risk that clinical trials will not commence or proceed as planned, the      risks      and uncertainties associated with dependence upon the actions of our corporate,      academic and other collaborators and of government regulatory agencies, the      risk      that our licenses to intellectual property may be terminated because of our      failure to have satisfied performance milestones, the risk that products that      appear promising in early clinical trials do not demonstrate efficacy in      larger-scale clinical trials, the risk that we may not be able to manufacture      commercial quantities of our products, the uncertainty of future profitability      and other factors set forth more fully in the Company’s Annual Report on Form      10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 and other reports filed with      the Securities and Exchange Commission, to which investors are referred for      further information. In particular, the Company cannot assure you that any      of      its programs will result in a commercial product. *

*Progenics      does not have a policy of updating or revising forward-looking statements and      assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements contained in      this      document as a result of new information or future events or developments. Thus,      it should not be assumed that the Company’s silence over time means that actual      events are bearing out as expressed or implied in such forward-looking      statements.*
UNITED STATES
 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C.
20549
  FORM
6-K
 
 Report of Foreign
Issuer
  Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16
of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
  
 For the month of October,
2008
 Commission File No.
1-9987
 
  
 
 B
+ H  O C E A N C A R R I E R S, L T D.
  
 
 
 3rdFloor,
Par La Ville Place
 14 Par-La-Ville
Road
 Hamilton HM JX
Bermuda
 (Address
of principal executive offices)
  
   
 
 Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under
cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.
 
 Form
20-F X   Form
40-F
 
 Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted
by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1):
  Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted
by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7):
 
 Indicate
by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this Form, the
registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant
to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
 
 Yes    NoX
  
   INFORMATION
CONTAINED IN THIS FORM 6-K REPORT
  
 Set forth herein as Exhibit 99.1 is the Press
Release Announcing
the Company's Intent to Repurchase up to 600,000 Shares of Its Common Stockthrough
a Modified “Dutch Auction” Tender Offer.
 
 
  
 Signatures
 
 
 Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
  
 Date  October 21, 2008
 B+H Ocean Carriers,
Ltd.
 By:  /s/ Michael S.
Hudner
 Chief
Executive Officer
§ 153.15 Who shall apply. ( a ) *Applicant.* Any person proposing to construct, operate, maintain, or connect facilities at the borders of the United States and Canada or Mexico, for the export or import of natural gas to or from those countries, or to amend an existing Presidential Permit, shall file with the Commission an application for a Presidential Permit under subpart C of this part and Executive Order 10485, as amended by Executive Order 12038.
( b ) *Cross-reference.* Any person applying under paragraph (a) of this section for a Presidential Permit for the construction and operation of border facilities must also simultaneously apply for authorization under subpart B of this part.
§ 39.13 Regional Advisory Bodies. ( a ) The Commission will establish a Regional Advisory Body on the petition of at least two-thirds of the states within a region that have more than one-half of their electric load served within the region.
( b ) A petition to establish a Regional Advisory Body shall include a statement that the Regional Advisory Body is composed of one member from each participating state in the region, appointed by the governor of each state, and may include representatives of agencies, states and provinces outside the United States.
( c ) A Regional Advisory Body established by the Commission may provide advice to the Electric Reliability Organization or a Regional Entity or the Commission regarding: ( 1 ) The governance of an existing or proposed Regional Entity within the same region;
( 2 ) Whether a Reliability Standard proposed to apply within the region is just, reasonable, not unduly discriminatory or preferential, and in the public interest;
( 3 ) Whether fees for all activities under this part proposed to be assessed within the region are just, reasonable, not unduly discriminatory or preferential, and in the public interest; and
( 4 ) Any other responsibilities requested by the Commission.
( d ) The Commission may give deference to the advice of a Regional Advisory Body established by the Commission that is organized on an Interconnection-wide basis.