alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Joseph T. Gormley, Jr., State’s Attorney *v.*Nicholas A. Panuzio et al.

House, C. J., Shapiko, Loiselle, MacDonald and Bogdanski, Js.

Argued January 2

decision released February 12, 1974

*Edward F. Kwdn,*for the appellant (plaintiff).

*Leonard 8. Paoletta,*for the appellees (defendants).

Per Curiam.

This action in the nature of mandamus was brought by writ and complaint dated December 1, 1972. It sought an order from the Superior Court for Fairfield County requiring the *2defendant Nicholas A. Pannzio, as mayor of Bridgeport, and the defendant Frank S. McGee, as assessor of the city of Bridgeport, to implement a revaluation of taxable property in Bridgeport completed by Valuation Associates, Inc., a firm of independent municipal appraisers, and that “they further be ordered to use said values in setting the Real Estate Grand List of October 1, 1972.” The Superior Court sustained a demurrer to the complaint and the plaintiff having failed and neglected to plead further, the court granted the defendants’ motion for judgment. The plaintiff has appealed to this court from that judgment.

“Mandamus is an ancient common law writ, but its issuance is governed largely by equitable considerations, and it has been generally held that it will be denied where, by reason of events occurring subsequent to the commencement of the proceedings or because of the lapse of time, the relief sought would be nugatory or unavailing [citations omitted].” *State ex rel. Shelton*v. *Edwards,*109 Conn. 249, 254-55, 146 A. 382. In mandamus, the factual situation existing at the time the writ is to issue governs. *State ex rel. Board of Education*v. *D’Aulisa,*133 Conn. 414, 424, 52 A.2d 636; *State ex rel. Bulkeley*v. *Williams,*68 Conn. 131, 155, 35 A. 24, 421.

This court cannot find facts, but in argument it was represented to us that the defendant McGee is no longer an assessor in Bridgeport, that the new assessor has implemented the revaluation on the 1973 grand list and the revaluation sought by the plaintiff is now effective. "While counsel for the plaintiff claimed that he lacked knowledge as to whether the revaluation has been implemented on *3the 1973 grand list, he did agree that it is now impractical to order that the 1972 grand list be computed on the basis of the revaluation made by Valuation Associates, Inc.—which is the relief which he sought in this action. In these circumstances, it is obvious that even if this court should conclude that the trial court was in error in sustaining the demurrer to the plaintiff’s complaint, nevertheless, no practical relief can follow. “[I]t is not the province of appellate courts to decide moot questions, disconnected from the granting of actual relief or from the determination of which no practical relief can follow.” *Reynolds*v. *Vroom,*130 Conn. 512, 515, 36 A.2d 22; *Roy*v. *Mulcahy,*161 Conn. 324, 328, 288 A.2d 64; Maltbie, Conn. App. Proc. V 21, 339. “The question presented is academic, and we must refuse to entertain the appeal.” *Young*v. *Tynan,*148 Conn. 456, 459, 172 A.2d 190.

The appeal is dismissed.
# C_2013225EN.01001102.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/11

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2013 — Eni SpA v European Commission

(Case C-508/11 P P) (1)

1

(Appeals - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Butadiene rubber and emulsion styrene butadiene rubber market manufactured by emulsion polymerisation - Attributability of unlawful conduct of subsidiaries to their parent companies - Presumption of the actual exercise of a decisive influence - Obligation to state reasons - Gravity of the infringement - Multiplier for deterrence - Actual impact on the market - Aggravating circumstances - Repeated infringements)

2013/C 225/17

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Eni SpA (represented by: G.M. Roberti and I. Perego, avvocati)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci, G. Conte and M.L. Malferrari, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 13 July 2011 — Case T-39/07 Eni v Commission by which the General Court dismissed in part the action seeking the annulment, as regards Eni SpA, of Commission Decision C(2006) 5700 final of 29 November 2006 relating to a proceeding under Articles 81 EC and 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/F/38.638 — butadiene rubber and emulsion styrene-butadiene rubber), or, in the alternative, the annulment or reduction of the fine imposed on Eni — Evidence of infringement — Imputability of the infringement — Failure to state reasons

Eni

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the main appeal and the cross-appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the main appeal and the cross-appeal;

| 2. | Orders Eni SpA to pay the costs of the main appeal; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Eni SpA to pay the costs of the main appeal;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs of the cross-appeal. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs of the cross-appeal.

---

(1)  OJ C 340, 19.11.2011.

1

---
### §2123. Promotions; acceptance; oath of office

(a) An officer who receives an appointment under section 2121 of this title is considered to have accepted his appointment on its effective date, unless he expressly declines the appointment.

(b) An officer who has served continuously since he subscribed to the oath of office prescribed in section 3331 of title 5 is not required to take a new oath upon his appointment in a higher grade.

(Added Pub. L. 88–130, §1(10)(C), Sept. 24, 1963, 77 Stat. 182, §273; amended Pub. L. 94–546, §1(20), Oct. 18, 1976, 90 Stat. 2520; renumbered §2123 and amended Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §§112(b), 123(b)(2), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4216, 4240.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282, §112(b), renumbered section 273 of this title as this section.

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 115–282, §123(b)(2), substituted "section 2121" for "section 271".

1976—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 94–546 substituted reference to section 3331 of title 5 for reference to section 16 of title 5.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          166499
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    20414
<ALLOWANCES>                                      2745
<INVENTORY>                                       5748
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                194870
<PP&E>                                            9072
<DEPRECIATION>                                    4367
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  301101
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            31854
<BONDS>                                           2265
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           216
<OTHER-SE>                                      250841
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    301101
<SALES>                                          32270
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 32270
<CGS>                                             9151
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     9151
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   257
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 287
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   6472
<INCOME-TAX>                                      2746
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               3726
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      3726
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.19


</TABLE>
§ 417.7 Training. ( a ) Only an individual who has met the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section, but who need not be an employee of the establishment, shall be permitted to perform the following functions: ( 1 ) Development of the HACCP plan, in accordance with § 417.2(b) of this part, which could include adapting a generic model that is appropriate for the specific product; and
( 2 ) Reassessment and modification of the HACCP plan, in accordance with § 417.3 of this part.
( b ) The individual performing the functions listed in paragraph (a) of this section shall have successfully completed a course of instruction in the application of the seven HACCP principles to meat, poultry, or egg products processing, including a segment on the development of a HACCP plan for a specific product and on record review.
[61 FR 38868, July 25, 1996, as amended at 85 FR 68672, Oct. 29, 2020]
# C_2012295EN.01000802.xml

| 29.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 295/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 295/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 July 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hessisches Landessozialgericht, Darmstadt (Germany)) — Land Hessen v Florence Feyerbacher

(Case C-62/11) (1)

1

(Protocol on the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the ECB - Article 36 - Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Communities - Articles 13, 15 and 23 - ECB Headquarters Agreement - Article 15 - Applicability to ECB staff of the provisions of German social welfare law providing for a parental allowance)

2012/C 295/13

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Hessisches Landessozialgericht, Darmstadt

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Land Hessen

Appellant:

Respondent: Florence Feyerbacher

Respondent:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Hessisches Landessozialgericht, Darmstadt — Interpretation of Article 15 of the Agreement of 18 September 1998 between the Government of the Federal Republic of Germany and the European Central Bank on the Headquarters of that institution, in conjunction with Article 36 of the Protocol on the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and the European Central Bank — Right of a German official of the European Central Bank to receive a parental allowance provided for under German law — Classification of the Agreement on the Headquarters of the European Central Bank as part of European Union law or as an international treaty — Applicability of the provisions of German social law providing for the parental allowance to employees of the European Central Bank

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 15 of the Agreement of 18 September 1998 between the German Government and the European Central Bank on the Headquarters of that institution, read in conjunction with Article 36 of the Protocol on the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, in the version annexed to the EC Treaty, does not preclude the Federal Republic of Germany from being able to grant an allowance such as that at issue in the main proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 145, 14.5.2011.

1

---
#### Adelaide ALEXANDER, Movant, v. COMMONWEALTH of Kentucky, Opposed.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

Oct. 20, 1939.

Norman W. Bowman for movant.

Hubert Meredith, Attorney General, and J. M. Campbell, Assistant Attorney General, opposed.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal denied; judgment affirmed.
### §3704b–1. Recovery of operating costs through fee collections

Operating costs for the National Technical Information Service associated with the acquisition, processing, storage, bibliographic control, and archiving of information and documents shall be recovered primarily through the collection of fees.

(Pub. L. 102–245, title I, §103(c), Feb. 14, 1992, 106 Stat. 8.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the American Technology Preeminence Act of 1991, and not as part of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 which comprises this chapter.
Exhibit 20.1
                                                             ------------
                                     
Chase Manhattan Grantor Trust 1996-A

From: The Chase Manhattan Bank

To:   Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.


                   MONTHLY CERTIFICATEHOLDER'S REPORT
                   ----------------------------------

Due Period 18 Beginning Date                     07/01/1997
Due Period 18 End Date                           07/31/1997
Determination Date                               08/08/1997
Remittance Date                                  08/15/1997


I.    Monthly Principal and Principal Carryover Shortfall to Certificateholders
      (Per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                  $ 24.8129818389

II.   Monthly Interest and Unpaid Interest to Certificateholders
      (Per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                   $ 2.1916760611

III.  Monthly Expenses Summary

      A. Servicing Fee Disbursement                                $ 621,367.04
      B. Cash Collateral Account Expense                                 $ 0.00
      C. Total Expenses paid
         (per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                $ 0.4214761666

IV.   Cash Collateral Account Deposit Amount                             $ 0.00

V.    Outstanding Advance Summary

      A. From Prior Period                                       $ 3,932,662.65
      B. From Current Period                                     $ 3,871,287.09
      C. Change in Amount Between Periods (Lines B - A)            $ -61,375.56

VI.   Pool Factor Information

      A. Certificate Principal Balance                         $ 709,059,566.24
      B. Initial Certificate Balance                         $ 1,474,263,764.33
      C. Pool Factor (Lines A / B)                               0.480958416937

VII.  Available Cash Collateral Account Information for Due Period

      A. Available Cash Collateral Amount                       $ 37,282,022.31
      B. Available Cash Collateral Amount Percentage            4.999999999665%

VIII. Required Cash Collateral Amount

      A. For the Current Collection Period                      $ 37,282,022.31
      B. For the Next Collection Period                         $ 35,452,978.31
### §1826. Notice of violations to Attorney General

Whenever the Secretary believes that a willful violation of this chapter has occurred and that prosecution is needed to obtain compliance with this chapter, he shall inform the Attorney General and the Attorney General shall take such action with respect to such matter as he deems appropriate.

(Pub. L. 91–540, §7, Dec. 9, 1970, 84 Stat. 1406.)
§ 72.17 Unloading noninfected cattle for rest, feed, and water only, permitted in authorized pens for such purpose. ( a ) *Specifications for construction and maintenance.* Cattle of the free area, and cattle of the quarantined area when properly dipped, inspected, and certified in accordance with this part, which are transported interstate by rail through the quarantined area shall not be unloaded therein for rest, feed, and water unless they are unloaded into the properly equipped, noninfectious pens set apart for such cattle at such points as may from time to time be authorized by APHIS. Such noninfectious pens and the platforms, chutes, and alleys leading thereto shall be constructed and maintained in accordance with the specifications set out in paragraphs (a)(1) to (6) of this section. ( 1 ) The outside fences enclosing such pens, and the fences on either side of the alleys, chutes, and platforms leading thereto, shall be tight board fences not less than 6 feet high on the inside.
( 2 ) If such pens, alleys, chutes, and platforms are adjacent to pens, alleys, chutes, and platforms used by cattle of the quarantined area, there shall be between them a space not less than 10 feet wide, which shall be inaccessible to livestock. This space shall be limited on each side by the 6-foot fence required by paragraph (a)(1) of this section. The remaining space around such yards shall be limited as in paragraph (a)(3) of this section.
( 3 ) If such pens, alleys, chutes, and platforms are isolated from other pens, alleys, chutes, or platforms, there shall be built and maintained outside thereof on all sides to which cattle of the vicinity might otherwise approach a cattle-proof fence not less than 5 feet high and not less than 15 feet from the 6-foot fence required by paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
( 4 ) The only means of egress from such pens shall be by way of the alleys, chutes, and platforms inclosed by 6-foot fences as required by paragraph (a)(1) of this section, to cars for reforwarding; and under no circumstances shall there exist any connection between such pens and other adjacent premises.
( 5 ) Such noninfectious premises shall be so located, or such drainage facilities shall be provided therefor, that water from the surrounding area will not flow on to or through them.
( 6 ) Such pens shall be marked by a conspicuous sign bearing the words “Noninfectious Pens” in letters not less than 10 inches in height.
( b ) *Materials for use in noninfectious pens; source, shipment, handling.* The hay, straw, or similar materials required for feed and bedding in such noninfectious pens shall be shipped in noninfectious cars from points outside of the quarantined area so handled that they may not become infectious.
[28 FR 5940, June 13, 1963, as amended at 56 FR 51975, Oct. 17, 1991]
Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report  of Sunburst Acquisitions VI, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form  10-QSB for the period ending January 31, 2005  (the
"Report"), I,  Michael R. Quinn, Principal Executive Officer  and  Principal
Financial  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to  18 U.S.C.  Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of  2002,
that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the  Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.



/s/ Michael R. Quinn

-----------------------
Principal Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer
Date: August 3, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 47 (Thursday, March 10, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13124-13125]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5453]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Del Norte Resource Advisory Committee (RAC)

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Del Norte Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet in 
Crescent City, California. The committee meeting is authorized under 
the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-

[[Page 13125]]

Determination (SRS) Act (Pub.L. 110-343) and in compliance with the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act.

DATES: The meeting will be held March 28, 2011, from 5 p.m. to 9 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Del Norte County Unified 
School District, Redwood Room 301, West Washington Boulevard, Crescent 
City, California, 95531.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Adam Dellinger, Committee Coordinator, 
Six Rivers National Forest, at (707) 441-3569; e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3f5e5b5a53535651585a4d7f594c11595a5b114a4c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3d5c5958515154535a584f7d5b4e135b585913484e">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Del Norte County RAC will discuss how to 
monitor recommended projects and will vote on projects to recommend for 
funding. The meeting is open to the public and there will also be a 
public comment opportunity.

    Dated: March 2, 2011.
Tyrone Kelley,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2011-5453 Filed 3-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-12-1998
<CASH>                                           5,007
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,874
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,085
<INVENTORY>                                     44,900
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                62,279
<PP&E>                                          87,796
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,988
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 154,197
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           56,316
<BONDS>                                         60,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            48
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,783
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   154,197
<SALES>                                        363,041
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               363,041
<CGS>                                          275,733
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  275,733
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                88,884
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,632
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,208)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,431
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,639)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,639)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.79)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.79)
        


</TABLE>
### §300. Application of State laws

All articles of merchandise to which sections 294 to 300 of this title apply which shall have been transported into any State, Territory, District, or possession of the United States, and shall remain therein for use, sale, or storage, shall, upon arrival in such State, Territory, District, or possession, be subject to the operation of all the laws of such State, Territory, District, or possession of the United States to the same extent and in the same manner as though such articles of merchandise had been produced in such State, Territory, District, or possession, and shall not be exempt therefrom by reason of being introduced therein in original packages or otherwise.

(June 13, 1906, ch. 3289, §7, 34 Stat. 262.)