alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the second
quarter 10-QSB for the fiscal year ending August 31, 1999 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000835412
<NAME> TMS, INC.
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1999
<CASH>                                       1,007,217
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,017,179
<ALLOWANCES>                                   174,467
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,493,973
<PP&E>                                       2,997,026
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,551,939
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,623,143
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          570,226
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       687,316
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,021,861
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,623,143
<SALES>                                      2,532,386
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,532,386
<CGS>                                        1,230,098
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,230,098
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,872,928
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                32,898
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,808
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (574,491)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       955
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (573,536)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (573,536)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)
        

</TABLE>
§ 153.8 Required exhibits. ( a ) An application must include the following exhibits: ( 1 ) *Exhibit A.* A certified copy of articles of incorporation, partnership or joint venture agreements, and by-laws of applicant; the amount and classes of capital stock; nationality of officers, directors, and stockholders, and the amount and class of stock held by each;
( 2 ) *Exhibit B.* A detailed statement of the financial and corporate relationship existing between applicant and any other person or corporation;
( 3 ) *Exhibit C.* A statement, including signed opinion of counsel, showing that the construction, operation, or modification of facilities for the export or the import of natural gas is within the authorized powers of applicant, that applicant has complied with laws and regulations of the state or states in which applicant operates;
( 4 ) *Exhibit D.* If the proposal is for a pipeline interconnection to import or export natural gas, a copy of any construction and operation agreement between the applicant and the operator(s) of border facilities in the United States and Canada or Mexico;
( 5 ) *Exhibit E.* If the proposal is to import or export LNG, evidence that an appropriate and qualified concern will properly and safely receive or deliver such LNG, including a report containing detailed engineering and design information. The Commission staff's “Guidance Manual for Environmental Report Preparation” may be obtained from the Commission's Office of Energy Projects, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426;
( 6 ) *Exhibit F.* An environmental report as specified in §§ 380.3 and 380.12 of this chapter. Applicant must submit all appropriate revisions to Exhibit F whenever route or site changes are filed. These revisions should identify the specific differences resulting from the route or site changes, and not just provide revised totals for the resources affected;
( 7 ) *Exhibit G.* A geographical map of a suitable scale and detail showing the physical location of the facilities to be utilized for the applicant's proposed export or import operations The map should indicate with particularity the ownership of such facilities at or on each side of the border between the United States and Canada or Mexico, if applicable; and
( 8 ) *Exhibit H.* A statement identifying each Federal authorization that the proposal will require; the Federal agency or officer, or State agency or officer acting pursuant to delegated Federal authority, that will issue each required authorization; the date each request for authorization was submitted; why any request was not submitted and the date submission is expected; and the date by which final action on each Federal authorization has been requested or is expected.
( b ) The applicant may incorporate by reference any Exhibit required by paragraph (a) of this section already on file with the Commission.
[Order 595, 62 FR 30446, June 4, 1997, as amended by Order 603, 64 FR 26604, May 14, 1999; Order 687, 71 FR 62920, Oct. 27, 2006; Order 699, 72 FR 45325, Aug. 14, 2007; Order 900, 88 FR 74042, Oct. 30, 2023]
#### § 157.39 Rate treatment of pipeline expansions.

There shall be a rebuttable presumption that rates for any expansion of an Alaska natural gas transportation project shall be determined on a rolled-in basis.
#### § 15.49 Program accessibility; discrimination prohibited.

Except as otherwise provided in § 15.50, no qualified individual with a disability shall, because the Department's facilities are inaccessible to or unusable by individuals with a disability, be denied the benefits of, be excluded from participation in, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity conducted by the Department.
**Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Disaster Response Grants**

****

**Template for**

**Budget Disbursement Request**

**Note:** The enclosed document is provided as a sample format for requesting budget disbursements within the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Crisis Counseling Assistance and Training Program (CCP) Regular Services Program (RSP) grants. It is recommended that states follow the attached format when requesting additional funding disbursements within the total grant award. The actual object class categories used for the attached budget table must correspond with the object classes in the approved budget. It is recommended that states consult with their Center for Mental Health Services project officer to coordinate the timing of their disbursement request in order to maintain funding continuity.

**U.S. Department of Health and Human Services**

**Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration**

**Center for Mental Health Services**

CCP Application Toolkit, Version 4.0 

March 2013

Template for Budget Disbursement Request, Page 5 of 5

[Name]

Project Officer

Emergency Mental Health and Traumatic Stress Services Branch

Center for Mental Health Services

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration

1 Choke Cherry Road, Room 6–[####]

Rockville, Maryland 20857

Dear [Name],

As the Project Director for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) [####] Regular Services Program crisis counseling grant to [state name], I am writing to request an additional disbursement of funds in the amount of [$$$].  The state received approval for up to [$$$] to provide crisis counseling services and received an initial obligation of [$$$].

Budget tables are attached for the entire program, the state, and each service provider.  These tables document actual expenditures to date within the categories of the approved budget and the amount remaining in each approved budget category.

Please call me at [(###) ###-####] if you have any questions.

						Sincerely,

						[Name of Project Director]

cc:	Governor’s Authorized Representative

	Gwendolyn Simpson, SAMHSA Grants Management

	Randall Kinder, FEMA Headquarters
### §7610. Definitions

As used in this chapter:

#### (1) Contact lens fitting

The term "contact lens fitting" means the process that begins after the initial eye examination and ends when a successful fit has been achieved or, in the case of a renewal prescription, ends when the prescriber determines that no change in prescription is required, and such term may include—

(A) an examination to determine lens specifications;

(B) except in the case of a renewal of a prescription, an initial evaluation of the fit of the lens on the eye; and

(C) medically necessary follow up examinations.

#### (2) Prescriber

The term "prescriber" means, with respect to contact lens prescriptions, an ophthalmologist, optometrist, or other person permitted under State law to issue prescriptions for contact lenses in compliance with any applicable requirements established by the Food and Drug Administration.

#### (3) Contact lens prescription

The term "contact lens prescription" means a prescription, issued in accordance with State and Federal law, that contains sufficient information for the complete and accurate filling of a prescription, including the following:

(A) Name of the patient.

(B) Date of examination.

(C) Issue date and expiration date of prescription.

(D) Name, postal address, telephone number, and facsimile telephone number of prescriber.

(E) Power, material or manufacturer or both.

(F) Base curve or appropriate designation.

(G) Diameter, when appropriate.

(H) In the case of a private label contact lens, name of manufacturer, trade name of private label brand, and, if applicable, trade name of equivalent brand name.

(Pub. L. 108–164, §11, Dec. 6, 2003, 117 Stat. 2027.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 60 days after Dec. 6, 2003, see section 12 of Pub. L. 108–164, set out as a note under section 7601 of this title.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

AARON L. WILSON,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 337 WAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 19th day of November, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED.
# C_2012098EN.01001001.xml

| 31.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 98/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 98/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 February 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Hamburg (Germany)) — Jürgen Blödel-Pawlik v HanseMerkur Reiseversicherung AG

(Case C-134/11) (1)

1

(Directive 90/314/EEC - Package travel, package holidays and package tours - Article 7 - Protection against the risk of insolvency or bankruptcy on the part of the package organiser - Scope - Insolvency of the organiser on account of its fraudulent use of the funds transferred by consumers)

2012/C 98/13

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Landgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Jürgen Blödel-Pawlik

Applicant:

Defendant: HanseMerkur Reiseversicherung AG

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Landgericht Hamburg — Interpretation of Article 7 of Council Directive 90/314/EEC of 13 June 1990 on package travel, package holidays and package tours (OJ 1990 L 158, p. 59) — Protection against the risk of insolvency or bankruptcy of the organiser — Insolvency of the organiser on account of misappropriation of the funds transferred by consumers — Applicability of Directive 90/314/EEC

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 7 of Council Directive 90/314/EEC of 13 June 1990 on package travel, package holidays and package tours is to be interpreted as covering a situation in which the insolvency of the travel organiser is attributable to its own fraudulent conduct.

---

(1)  OJ C 179, 18.6.2011.

1

---
# C_2012366EN.01001402.xml

| 24.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 366/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 366/14

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 October 2012 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium

(Case C-391/11) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2000/53/EC - Article 2(3) - Protection of the environment - End-of-life vehicles - Notion of producer)

2012/C 366/23

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: A. Marghelis and M. Patakia, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Belgium (represented by: C. Pochet and T. Materne, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure by a Member State to failing to adopt the measures necessary to comply with the provisions of Article 2(1) and (3) and Article 5(1), (2) and (4) of Directive 2000/53/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 September 2000 on end-of life vehicles (OJ 2000 L 269, p. 34) — Notion of ‘vehicle’ and ‘producer’ — Free-of-charge delivery of end-of-life vehicles subject to conditions not provided for by the directive

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court hereby:

| 1. | Dismisses the action |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action

| 2. | Orders the European Commission and the Kingdom of Belgium each to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission and the Kingdom of Belgium each to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 305, 15.1.2011.

1

---
§ 341.2 Filing requirements. ( a ) *Service of filings.* ( 1 ) Carriers must serve tariff publications and justifications to each shipper and subscriber. Such service shall be made in accordance with the requirements of § 385.2010 of this chapter.
( 2 ) Unless it seeks a waiver of electronic service, each customer or party entitled to service under this paragraph (a) must notify the company of the e-mail address to which service should be directed. A customer or party may seek a waiver of electronic service by filing a waiver request under Part 390 of this chapter providing good cause for its inability to accept electronic service.
( b ) *Notice period.* All tariff publications (except for suspension supplements, adoption notices, adoption supplements, and tariff indexes) must be filed with the Commission and posted not less than 30, nor more than 60, days prior to the proposed effective date, unless a different notice period is authorized by the Commission. The notice period shall begin the first full day after the tariff publication is filed with the Commission and shall end on the last day prior to the tariff publication effective date.
( c ) *Transmittal letter* — ( 1 ) *Contents.* Letters of transmittal must describe the filing and explain any changes to the carrier's rates, rules, terms or conditions of service; state if a waiver is being requested, and specify the statute, section, regulation, policy or order requested to be waived; and identify the tariffs supplemental numbers, or tariff sections and the proposed effective date of the tariff publication. Carriers must provide to the Commission, in the letter of transmittal accompanying the filing of a tariff publication containing a joint carrier, the address, phone number, and a contact for each joint carrier listed in the tariff publication.
( 2 ) *Certification.* Letters of transmittal must certify that the filing has been sent to each subscriber of the tariff publication pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section. For service made on paper, the letters of transmittal must certify that the filing has been sent to each customer or party by first class mail or other agreed-upon means. If there are no subscribers, letters of transmittal must so certify.
[58 FR 58773, Nov. 4, 1993, as amended by Order 606, 64 FR 44404, Aug. 16, 1999; Order 714, 73 FR 57536, Oct. 3, 2008; Order 780, 78 FR 32098, May 29, 2013]
### §3418. Injunctive relief

In addition to any other remedy contained in this chapter, injunctive relief shall be available to require that the procedures of this chapter are complied with. In the event of any successful action, costs together with reasonable attorney's fees as determined by the court may be recovered.

(Pub. L. 95–630, title XI, §1118, Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3709.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective upon the expiration of 120 days after Nov. 10, 1978, see section 2101 of Pub. L. 95–630, set out as a note under section 375b of this title.
# C_2012287EN.01000801.xml

| 22.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 5 July 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Wien — Austria) — Content Services Ltd v Bundesarbeitskammer

(Case C-49/11) (1)

1

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 97/7/EC - Consumer protection - Distance contracts - Consumer information - Information given or received - Durable medium - Meaning - Hyperlink on the website of the supplier - Right of withdrawal)

2012/C 287/12

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Oberlandesgericht Wien

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Content Services Ltd

Applicant:

Defendant: Bundesarbeitskammer

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Oberlandesgericht Wien — Interpretation of Article 5(1) of Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 1997 on the protection of consumers in respect of distance contracts (OJ 1997 L 144, p. 19) — Information concerning the contract made available to the consumer via a hyperlink to the supplier's website — Right of the consumer to receive that information in a durable medium — Interpretation of the notion of ‘durable medium’

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 5(1) of Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 1997 on the protection of consumers in respect of distance contracts must be interpreted as meaning that a business practice consisting of making the information referred to in that provision accessible to the consumer only via a hyperlink on a website of the undertaking concerned does not meet the requirements of that provision, since that information is neither ‘given’ by that undertaking nor ‘received’ by the consumer, within the meaning of that provision, and a website such as that at issue in the main proceedings cannot be regarded as a ‘durable medium’ within the meaning of Article 5(1).

---

(1)  OJ C 145, 14.5.2011.

1

---
# C_2007068EN.01002501.xml

| 24.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 68/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 68/25

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

23 March 2007

(2007/C 68/05)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3327 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 156,65 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4505 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67780 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3135 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6164 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 88,46 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1150 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5805 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,973 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 246,70 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7096 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8760 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,3630 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 33,582 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8479 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6519 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5432 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,4103 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8654 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0217 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 248,54 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,6281 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,2991 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3815 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 140,90 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6065 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 64,003 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,6730 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,402 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3327

JPY

Japanese yen

156,65

DKK

Danish krone

7,4505

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67780

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3135

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6164

ISK

Iceland króna

88,46

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1150

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5805

CZK

Czech koruna

27,973

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

246,70

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7096

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8760

RON

Romanian leu

3,3630

SKK

Slovak koruna

33,582

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8479

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6519

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5432

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,4103

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8654

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0217

KRW

South Korean won

1 248,54

ZAR

South African rand

9,6281

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,2991

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3815

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 140,90

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6065

PHP

Philippine peso

64,003

RUB

Russian rouble

34,6730

THB

Thai baht

42,402

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
|   | Ÿ | the      Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the year ended December      31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the      “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Ÿ | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   | /s/      Jeffrey W. Epstein                            |   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Jeffrey      W. Epstein                                |   |
|   |   | President                                              |   |
|   |   | (Principal      Executive Officer)                     |   |
|   |   | April      29, 2008                                    |   |
|   |   |                                                   |   |
|   |   | /s/      Neil Hazard                                   |   |
|   |   | Neil      Hazard                                       |   |
|   |   | Executive      Vice President, Chief Financial Officer |   |
|   |   | (Principal      Financial Officer)                     |   |
|   |   | April      29, 2008                                    |   |

----