alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 367.1360 Account 136, Temporary cash investments. ( a ) This account must include the book cost of investments, such as demand and time loans, bankers' acceptances, United States Treasury certificates, marketable securities, and other similar investments, acquired for the purpose of temporarily investing cash.
( b ) This account must be maintained so as to show separately temporary cash investments in securities of associate companies and of others. Records must be kept of any pledged investments.
§ 351.5 Conditions of eligibility for certification service; review of applications. ( a ) To be eligible for certification service under the regulations in this part, the operator of a rendering plant must demonstrate that: ( 1 ) He operates a rendering plant which will receive materials derived from inspected and passed carcasses, or parts of carcasses, of animals that did not die otherwise than by slaughter under inspection, (i.e., not “dead animals”); and such source materials will be rendered at the plant into technical animal fat eligible for export, or storage for export, in accordance with the regulations in this part;
( 2 ) The source materials and the rendered technical animal fat described in paragraph (a)(1) will be identified and kept separated at all times from other products; and
( 3 ) He will comply with the applicable regulations in this part.
( b ) To be eligible for certification service under the regulations in this part, the operator of a storage facility must demonstrate that: ( 1 ) He operates a storage facility that will receive for storage certified technical animal fat shipped directly from a certified rendering plant for storage for export and he will keep such shipments identified and separated from other products that are not certified, and he will receive such fat only if it is accompanied by MP Form 85, as required by § 351.17.
( 2 ) He will comply with the applicable regulations in this part.
( c ) Each applicant for certification service must file with the Administrator, with the application for service, a written description of the procedures to be used for receiving, identifying, processing, storing, and otherwise handling technical animal fat, and materials for use in the preparation thereof, at the plant or storage facility involved, and for shipping technical animal fat from the plant or facility and storing and exporting such technical animal fat, and a written description of the shipping, receiving, and inventory records maintained for technical animal fat.
( d ) The Administrator will determine, on the basis of all information available to him, whether the arrangements at the plant or storage facility are such as will assure that certifications of technical animal fat will be correct, and, if so, will grant the application for certification service. An applicant will be given an opportunity to present his views prior to refusal of the service.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0583-0036) [40 FR 58627, Dec. 18, 1975, as amended at 41 FR 12637, Mar. 26, 1976; 47 FR 746, Jan. 7, 1982]
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 7, 2016

No. 04-15-00799-CR

Eric G. YZAGUIRRE,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13-1569-CR-C

Honorable Gary L. Steel, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s brief was originally due February 29, 2016, but was not filed. Because

appellant’s counsel filed neither the brief nor a motion to extend time to file the brief, this court 

sent counsel a notice advising him the brief was past due. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8. On March 

11, 2016, in response to our notice, counsel filed a motion to extend time to file the brief, which 

this court granted. After we granted appellant’s first request for extension of time, his brief was 

due April 11, 2016 — forty-two days from the original due date. The brief was not filed by the 

due date, but on April 17, 2016, appellant’s counsel filed a second motion to extend time to file 

his brief and a motion to supplement the reporter’s record. In the motion to supplement, and for 

the first time, appellant’s counsel stated certain portions of the reporter’s record had not been 

filed and he could not complete the appellate brief without them. In his extension, he asked that 

he be allowed thirty days after the record was supplemented to file his brief. 

In response, on April 19, 2016, we ordered the court reporter to file those portions of the 

record requested by counsel. On June 1, 2016, the reporter filed several supplemental volumes 

of the reporter’s record. Accordingly, per our prior order, which required appellant to file his 

brief in this court on or before thirty days from the date the supplemental reporter’s record was 

filed, we ordered appellant to file appellant’s brief in this court on or before July 1, 2016. 

However, neither the brief nor a motion to extend time to file the brief was filed. 

Accordingly, we ORDER attorney E. Chevo Pastrano to file appellant’s brief in this 

court on or before August 8, 2016. If the brief is not filed on or before the date ordered, the 
court will abate this appeal and remand the case to the trial court for a hearing to determine 

whether appellant or his counsel has abandoned the appeal. 

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on the trial court and all 

counsel. 

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 7th day of July, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
(66 South. 395)

No. 20663.

#### STATE v. BRADLEY.

(Nov. 4, 1914.)

*(Syllabus by the Court.)*

Criminal Law <&wkey;1091 — “Bill or Exceptions” — What Constitutes.

A notation by the clerk of court in a criminal case that the defendant excepted and reserved a bill cannot be considered a bill of exception.

[Ed. Note. — For other eases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 2803, 2815, 2S16, 2818, 2819, 2823, 2824, 2828-2833, 2843, 2931-2933, 2943; Dec. Dig. &wkey;109Jl.

For other definitions, see Words and Phrases, First and Second Series, Bill of Exceptions.]

Appeal from Twenty-First Judicial District Court, Parish of Pointe Coupee; G. K. Schwing, Judge.

William Bradley, alias Bud Bradley, was convicted of arson and appeals.

Affirmed.

Albin Provosty, of New Roads, for appellant. R. G. Pleasant, Atty. Gen., and J. II. Morrison, Dist. Atty., of New Roads (G. A. Gondran, of New Orleans, of counsel), for the State.

LAND, J.

Defendant, charged with' the crime of arson (the burning of a church), was convicted and sentenced to the penitentiary for seven years, and has appealed, but has made no appearance by counsel in this court.

We find in the record not a single bill of exception. A notation by the clerk that the defendant excepted and reserved a bill does not relieve the party from the necessity of writing out, and having signed, a proper bill of exception. See State v. Carr, 111 La. 716, 35 South. 839.

Judgment affirmed.
Amendment to Employment Agreement between Paresh Patel and HCI Group



 Exhibit 10.89 

AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

The executive employment agreement, dated July 1, 2011, by and between HCI Group, Inc. (formerly Homeowners Choice, Inc.), is hereby
amended effective January 29, 2016 as follows. 
 1. Section 5 is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following. 

“This Agreement will terminate December 31, 2016. The foregoing sentence will not be interpreted as a termination of
employment.” 
 2. Section 6.1 is revised by deleting “$500,000” and inserting in lieu thereof “$950,000.”
This amendment will be treated as if effective January 1, 2016. 
  
  

			
	  
 Paresh
Patel

	
	HCI Group, Inc.
		
	By:	 	  

		 	Martin Traber
		 	Chairman of the Compensation Committee
§ 93.305 Declaration and other documents for horses. ( a ) The certificates, declarations, and affidavits required by the regulations in this part shall be presented by the importer or his or her agent to the collector of customs at the port of entry, upon arrival of horses at such port, for the use of the veterinary inspector at the port of entry.
( b ) For all horses offered for importation, the importer or his or her agent shall first present two copies of a declaration which shall list the port of entry, the name and address of the importer, the name and address of the broker, the origin of the horses, the number, breed, species, and purpose of the importation, the name of the person to whom the horses will be delivered, and the location of the place to which such delivery will be made.
( c ) Any declaration, permit, or other document for horses required under this subpart may be issued and presented using a U.S. Government electronic information exchange system or other authorized method.
[55 FR 31495, Aug. 2, 1990,as amended at 81 FR 40151, June 21, 2016]
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gouverneur Bancorp Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
F. Bennett, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes -Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.


May 12, 2003                           By:  /s/ RICHARD F. BENNETT
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Richard F. Bennett
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
Editorial Note on Part 12
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 12 appear at 69 FR 32438, June 10, 2004.

§ 12.1 Applicability. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided in this part or ordered by the Commission or its authorized representative, the provisions of this part apply to: ( 1 ) Any project licensed under Part I of the Federal Power Act;
( 2 ) Any unlicensed constructed project for which the Commission has determined that an application for license must be filed under Part I of the Act; and
( 3 ) Any project exempted from licensing under Part I of the Federal Power Act, pursuant to subparts J or K of part 4 of this chapter, to the extent that the Commission has conditioned the exemption on compliance with any particular provisions of this part.
( b ) The provisions of this part apply to a project that uses a Government dam only with respect to those project works, lands, and waters specifically licensed by the Commission.
# C_2013344EN.01000602.xml

| 23.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 344/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 344/6

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 October 2013 — European Commission v Republic of Latvia, Republic of Lithuania, Slovak Republic, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

(Case C-267/11 P) (1)

1

(Appeals - Integrated pollution prevention and control - Greenhouse gas emission allowance trading system - Allocation of allowances for the Republic of Latvia - Period from 2008 to 2012)

2013/C 344/07

Language of the case: Latvian

Parties

Parties

Appellant: European Commission (represented by: I. Rubene and E. White, acting as Agents)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Republic of Latvia (represented by: I. Kalniņš, acting as Agent), Republic of Lithuania, Slovak Republic, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Other parties to the proceedings:

Intervener in support of Republic of Latvia: Czech Republic (represented by: M. Smolek and D. Hadroušek, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of Republic of Latvia:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 22 March 2011 in Case T-369/07 Latvia v Commission, by which the General Court annulled Commission Decision C(2007) 3409, of 13 July 2007, on the amendment of the national plan for the allocation of greenhouse gas emission allowances notified by the Republic of Latvia for the period from 2008 to 2012, under Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC (OJ 2003 L 275, p. 32) — Misinterpretation of the procedure provided for in Article 9(3) of the directive — Erroneous application of the three-month time limit, laid down for initial decisions on new notified national allocation plans for greenhouse gas emission allowances (NAP), to a Commission decision accepting amendments to an NAP notified following a decision on the part of the Commission to reject the initial NAP

Latvia

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission, the Republic of Latvia and the Czech Republic to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission, the Republic of Latvia and the Czech Republic to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 226, 30.7.2011.

1

---
### §278d. Construction and improvement of buildings and facilities

#### (a) In general

Within the limits of funds which are appropriated for the Institute, the Secretary of Commerce is authorized to undertake such construction of buildings and other facilities and to make such improvements to existing buildings, grounds, and other facilities occupied or used by the Institute as are necessary for the proper and efficient conduct of the activities authorized herein.

#### (b) Retention of fees

The Director is authorized to retain all building use and depreciation surcharge fees collected pursuant to OMB Circular A–25. Such fees shall be collected and credited to the Construction of Research Facilities Appropriation Account for use in maintenance and repair of the Institute's existing facilities.

(Mar. 3, 1901, ch. 872, §14, as added Pub. L. 85–890, §1, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1711; amended Pub. L. 92–317, §3(d), June 22, 1972, 86 Stat. 235; Pub. L. 96–461, §8, Oct. 15, 1980, 94 Stat. 2051; Pub. L. 100–418, title V, §5115(a)(1), Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1433; Pub. L. 102–245, title I, §104(f), Feb. 14, 1992, 106 Stat. 11; Pub. L. 110–69, title III, §3014, Aug. 9, 2007, 121 Stat. 599.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

"Herein", referred to in subsec. (a), refers to act Mar. 3, 1901, ch. 872, which is classified generally to this chapter.

#### Amendments

2007—Pub. L. 110–69 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), inserted heading, and added subsec. (b).

1992—Pub. L. 102–245 substituted "herein." for "herein: Provided, That no improvement shall be made nor shall any building be constructed under this authority at a cost in excess of $250,000 unless specific provision is made therefor in the appropriation concerned."

1988—Pub. L. 100–418 substituted "Institute" for "National Bureau of Standards" wherever appearing.

1980—Pub. L. 96–461 substituted "$250,000" for $75,000".

1972—Pub. L. 92–317 substituted "$75,000" for "$40,000".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1980 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 96–461 effective Oct. 1, 1980, see section 11 of Pub. L. 96–461, set out as an Effective Date note under section 278g of this title.

#### Facilities for Cold Neutron Research

Pub. L. 101–162, title I, §104, Nov. 21, 1989, 103 Stat. 994, provided that: "Hereafter, the National Institute of Standards and Technology is authorized to accept contributions of funds, to remain available until expended, from any public or private source to construct a facility for cold neutron research on materials, notwithstanding the limitations contained in 15 U.S.C. 278d."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Operations
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           2,794
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,472
<ALLOWANCES>                                        80
<INVENTORY>                                     62,998
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                76,957
<PP&E>                                         128,190
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,237
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 192,208
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,005
<BONDS>                                         90,365
<COMMON>                                           595
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,975
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   192,208
<SALES>                                        342,102
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               342,102
<CGS>                                          238,645
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  238,645
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,681
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,440)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (530)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (910)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (910)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.15)
        

</TABLE>
CHOOSE INFORMAL TIMES TO 

TALK AS SHE GETS OLDER.

Look for new opportunities to start a conversation 

about alcohol.

Having frequent talks with your child in a safe environment will show that you 

care and foster a more open and honest dialogue about the risks of underage 

drinking. For tips on how—and when—to begin the conversation, visit 

www.underagedrinking.samhsa.gov

#TalkTheyHearYou PEP20-03-01-015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             132
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,749
<ALLOWANCES>                                       420
<INVENTORY>                                      7,623
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,702
<PP&E>                                           8,305
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,480
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  37,155
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,940
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      4,000
<COMMON>                                            47
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,774
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    37,155
<SALES>                                         53,582
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                53,582
<CGS>                                           29,280
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,989
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   430
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 536
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,347
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,759
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,588
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,588
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .89
        

</TABLE>
§ 2.17 Price discrimination and anticompetitive effect (price squeeze issue). To implement compliance with the Supreme Court decision in *F.P.C.* v. *Con-Way Corp.,* 426 U.S. 271 (1976), aff'g 510 F. 2d 1264 (D.C. Cir. 1975) and to expedite the consideration of price squeeze issues in wholesale electric rate proceedings, the Commission adopts the following procedures for raising price squeeze issues which are to be followed unless they are demonstrated in an individual case to be inadequate: ( a ) Any wholesale customer, state commission or other interested person may file petitions to intervene alleging price discrimination and anticompetitive effects of the wholesale rates. In order to have the issue of price discrimination considered in the rate proceeding, the intervening customer or other interested person must support its allegation by a prima facie case. The elements of the prima facie case shall include at a minimum: ( 1 ) Specification of the filing utility's retail rate schedules with which the intervening wholesale customer is unable to compete due to purchased power costs;
( 2 ) A showing that a competitive situation exists in that the wholesale customer competes in the same market as the filing utility;
( 3 ) A showing that the retail rates are lower than the proposed wholesale rates for comparable service;
( 4 ) The wholesale customer's prospective rate for comparable retail service, i.e. the rate necessary to recover bulk power costs (at the proposed wholesale rate) and distribution costs;
( 5 ) An indication of the reduction in the wholesale rate necessary to eliminate the price squeeze alleged.
( b ) Where price squeeze is alleged, the Commission shall, in the order granting intervention, direct the Administrative Law Judge to convene a prehearing conference within 15 days from the date of the order for the purpose of hearing intervenors' request for data required to present their case, including prima facie showing, on price squeeze issues.
( c ) Within 30 days from the date of the conference the filing utility shall respond to the data requests authorized by the Administrative Law Judge.
( d ) Within 30 days from the filing utility's response, the intervenors shall file their case-in-chief on price squeeze issues, which shall include their prima facie case, unless filed previously.
( e ) The burden of proof (i.e. the risk of nonpersuasion) to rebut the allegations of price squeeze and to justify the proposed rates are on the utility proposing the rates under section 205(e) of the Federal Power Act.
( f ) In proceedings where price squeeze is an issue, the Secretary shall include the state commission, agency or body which is responsible for regulation of retail rates in the state affected in the service list maintained under § 385.2010(c) of this chapter.
[Order 563, 42 FR 16132, Mar. 25, 1977, as amended by Order 225, 47 FR 19054, May 3, 1982]