alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PAGE 1

PROPOSAL UNDER THE 

SMALL 

COMMUNITY 

AIR 

SERVICE 

DEVELOPMENT 

PROGRAM

AUSTIN 

STRAUBEL INTERNATIONAL 

AIRPORT

SUMMARY INFORMATION

A. Applicant Information: 

(Check all that apply)

X Not a Consortium Interstate Consortium Intrastate Consortium

Community now receives EAS subsidy

Community (or Consortium member) previously received a Small 

Community Grant

If previous recipient, date of grant: 

Expiration date of grant: 

B. Public/Private Partnerships: 

(List organization names)

Public Private

Brown County/Austin Straubel 

International Airport

Green Bay Area Chamber of 

Commerce

C. Project Proposal: 

(Check all that apply)

X Marketing X Start-Up Cost Offset

Travel Bank Secure Additional Service

Surface Transportation New Route

Launch New Carrier Subsidy

Study X Revenue Guarantee

Upgrade Aircraft First Service

Service Restoration Other (explain below): 

Regional Service __________

D. Existing Landing Aids at Local Airport:

X Full ILS Published Instrument Approach

Localizer Outer/Middle Marker

Other (specify):

E. Project Cost:

Line Description Subtotal Total 

amount

1 Federal amount requested $500,000

2 State cash financial contribution $0

Local cash financial contribution

3a Airport cash funds $183,740

3b Non-airport cash funds $75,000

3 Total local cash funds (3a+3b) $258,740

4 TOTAL CASH FUNDING (1+2+3) $758,740

In-Kind contribution

5a Airport In-Kind contribution** $79,150

5b Other In-Kind contribution** $26,975

5 TOTAL IN-KIND CONTRIBUTION (5a+5b) $106,125

6 TOTAL PROJECT COST (4+5) $864,865

F. In-Kind Contributions**

For funds in lines 5a (Airport In-Kind contribution) and 5b (Other In-Kind contribution), 

please describe the source(s) of fund(s) for each.

Airport In-Kind: Landing fees, revenue enplanement rebate, program 

administration, and staffing

Other In-Kind: Marketing match from local media

G. Is this application subject to review by State under Executive Order 

12372 process?

a. This application was made available to the State under the Executive 

Order 12372. Process for review on (date) _____________.

b. Program is subject to E.O. 12372, but has not been selected for 

review.

c. Program is not covered by E.O. 12372.

H. Is the Applicant delinquent on any Federal debt? (if “yes”, provide 

explanation)

No

Yes (explain)

X

X
### §2641. Congressional findings and purpose

#### (a) Findings

The Congress finds the following:

(1) The Environmental Protection Agency's rule on local educational agency inspection for, and notification of, the presence of friable asbestos-containing material in school buildings includes neither standards for the proper identification of asbestos-containing material and appropriate response actions with respect to friable asbestos-containing material, nor a requirement that response actions with respect to friable asbestos-containing material be carried out in a safe and complete manner once actions are found to be necessary. As a result of the lack of regulatory guidance from the Environmental Protection Agency, some schools have not undertaken response action while many others have undertaken expensive projects without knowing if their action is necessary, adequate, or safe. Thus, the danger of exposure to asbestos continues to exist in schools, and some exposure actually may have increased due to the lack of Federal standards and improper response action.

(2) There is no uniform program for accrediting persons involved in asbestos identification and abatement, nor are local educational agencies required to use accredited contractors for asbestos work.

(3) The guidance provided by the Environmental Protection Agency in its "Guidance for Controlling Asbestos-Containing Material in Buildings" is insufficient in detail to ensure adequate responses. Such guidance is intended to be used only until the regulations required by this subchapter become effective.

(4) Because there are no Federal standards whatsoever regulating daily exposure to asbestos in other public and commercial buildings, persons in addition to those comprising the Nation's school population may be exposed daily to asbestos.

#### (b) Purpose

The purpose of this subchapter is—

(1) to provide for the establishment of Federal regulations which require inspection for asbestos-containing material and implementation of appropriate response actions with respect to asbestos-containing material in the Nation's schools in a safe and complete manner;

(2) to mandate safe and complete periodic reinspection of school buildings following response actions, where appropriate; and

(3) to require the Administrator to conduct a study to find out the extent of the danger to human health posed by asbestos in public and commercial buildings and the means to respond to any such danger.

(Pub. L. 94–469, title II, §201, as added Pub. L. 99–519, §2, Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2970.)
# C_2011103EN.01001601.xml

| 2.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/16

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour D’Appel D’Amiens (France) lodged on 31 January 2011 — Criminal proceedings against João Pedro Lopes Da Silva Jorge

(Case C-42/11)

2011/C 103/28

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Cour D’Appel D’Amiens

Party/parties to the main proceedings

Party/parties to the main proceedings

João Pedro Lopes Da Silva Jorge

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Does the principle of non discrimination laid down by Article 12 EC preclude national legislation such as Article 695-24 of the Code of Criminal Procedure which restricts the power to refuse to execute a European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a penalty involving deprivation of liberty to cases where the person whose extradition is sought is of French nationality and the competent French authorities undertake to proceed with such enforcement? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does the principle of non discrimination laid down by Article 12 EC preclude national legislation such as Article 695-24 of the Code of Criminal Procedure which restricts the power to refuse to execute a European arrest warrant issued for the purposes of enforcing a penalty involving deprivation of liberty to cases where the person whose extradition is sought is of French nationality and the competent French authorities undertake to proceed with such enforcement?

| 2. | Is the principle of the implementation in domestic law of the grounds for non enforcement provided for in Article 4(6) of the framework decision (1) a matter for the discretion of the Member States or is it compulsory, and in particular may a Member State adopt a measure involving discrimination based on nationality? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is the principle of the implementation in domestic law of the grounds for non enforcement provided for in Article 4(6) of the framework decision (1) a matter for the discretion of the Member States or is it compulsory, and in particular may a Member State adopt a measure involving discrimination based on nationality?

1

---

(1)  2002/584/JHA: Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — Statements made by certain Member States on the adoption of the Framework Decision (OJ 2002 L 190, p. 1).

1

---
**Exhibit
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION





PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(SUBSECTIONS
      (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF


TITLE
      18,
      UNITED STATES CODE)








Pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
      undersigned officers of NutraCea , a
      California corporation (the "Company”), do hereby certify with respect to the
      Quarterly Report of NutraCea on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008
      as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "10-Q Report")
      that:





(1)  the
      10-Q
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  the
      information contained in the 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      NutraCea.




Dated:
              August 11,
              2008
            
            NUTRACEA/s/
              Bradley EdsonBradley
              EdsonChief Executive Officer


/s/
                Todd
                C. CrowTodd
                C. CrowChief
                Financial Officer
# C_2013225EN.01006302.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/63 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/63

---

Judgment of the General Court of 29 May 2013 — Spain v Commission

(Case T-384/10) (1)

1

(Cohesion fund - Regulation (EC) No 1164/94 - Projects concerning water supply to settlements in the Guadiana river basin in the Andévalo area, drainage and water treatment in the Guadalquivir river basin and water supply to multi-municipal systems in the provinces of Granada and Málaga - Partial withdrawal of financial assistance - Public works and services contracts - ‘Work’ - Split of the procurement - Determination of the financial corrections - Article H(2) of Annex II of Regulation No 1164/94 - Proportionality)

2013/C 225/141

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented: initially by J. M. Rodríguez Cárcamo, and subsequently by A. Rubio González, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Steiblytė, D. Kukovec and B. Conte, acting as Agents, assisted initially by J. Rivas Andrés, X. García García, lawyers, and M. Vilarasau Slade, lawyer, and subsequently by Rivas Andrés and X. García García)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for the annulment of Commission Decision C(2010) 4147 of 30 June 2010, reducing the assistance granted from the Cohesion Fund to the following (groups of) projects: ‘Water supply to settlements in the Guadiana basin: Andévalo area’ (2000.ES.16.C.PE.133), ‘Drainage and water treatment in the Guadalquivir basin: Guadaira, Aljarafe and the areas of natural protection of the Guadalquivir’ (2000.16.C.PE.066) and ‘Water supply to multi-municipal systems in the provinces of Granada and Málaga’ (2002.ES.16.C.PE.061).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 288, 23.10.2010.

1

---
Editorial Note on Part 28
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear at 76 FR 76873, Dec. 9, 2011.

§ 28.149 Sanctions. The following sanctions shall be available for violations of this Subpart: ( a ) The Board, a panel of Board members, a Board member or an administrative judge, as necessary, may, in the interest of justice, require the offending party to show cause why their claim, interest, motion or petition should not be dismissed, denied or otherwise adversely affected.
( b ) The Board, a panel of Board members, a Board member or an administrative judge, as necessary, may invoke such sanctions against any offending party as may be appropriate under the circumstances.
[58 FR 61992, Nov. 23, 1993, as amended at 89 FR 51399, June 18, 2024]
§ 351.2 Terms defined. When used in this part, unless the context otherwise requires: ( a ) *Department* means the United States Department of Agriculture.
( b ) *Program* means the Meat and Poultry Inspection Program of the Food Safety and Inspection Service of the Department.
( c ) *Administrator* means the Administrator of the Food Safety and Inspection Service of the Department, or any officer or employee of the Department to whom authority has heretofore been delegated or may hereafter be delegated to act in his stead.
( d ) *Circuit supervisor* means an employee of the Program assigned to supervise and perform official work in a circuit. Such employee is assigned by and reports directly to the Administrator or person designated by him.
( e ) *Inspector* means an employee of the Program or a cooperating State.
( f ) *Circuit* means one or more inspected plants assigned to a circuit supervisor.
( g ) *Recognized State* means any State not designated in § 331.2 of this chapter.
( h ) *Cooperating State* means any State cooperating under § 351.7 in administration of the regulations in this part.
( i ) *Inspection* means ante-mortem and post-mortem inspection by Program inspectors or inspectors of a Meat Inspection Service of a recognized State.
( j ) *Animals* means cattle, sheep, swine, goats, horses, mules and other equines.
( k ) *Technical animal fat* means animal fat eligible for exportation, or storage for exportation, in accordance with § 325.11 of this chapter.
( l ) *Certified technical animal fat* means technical animal fat certified for export or storage for export under the regulations in this part.
( m ) *Tallow* means technical animal fat with a minimum titre of 40 °C.
( n ) *Certified plant* means any plant or storage facility preparing or storing certified technical animal fat for export, or for transfer to another certified plant or storage facility for ultimate export, and at which certification service is provided under the regulations in this part.
( o ) *Inspected and Passed* means inspected and passed under the Federal Meat Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 601 *et seq.*) or the meat inspection laws of a recognized State.
### §1123. Rules and regulations for conduct of proceedings in Patent and Trademark Office

The Director shall make rules and regulations, not inconsistent with law, for the conduct of proceedings in the Patent and Trademark Office under this chapter.

(July 5, 1946, ch. 540, title VI, §41, 60 Stat. 440; Pub. L. 93–596, §1, Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1949; Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4732(b)(1)(B)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–583.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Act Feb. 20, 1905, ch. 592, §26, 33 Stat. 730.

#### Amendments

1999—Pub. L. 106–113 substituted "Director" for "Commissioner".

1975—Pub. L. 93–596 substituted "Patent and Trademark Office" for "Patent Office".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1999 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 106–113 effective 4 months after Nov. 29, 1999, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, §4731] of Pub. L. 106–113, set out as a note under section 1 of Title 35, Patents.

#### Effective Date of 1975 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 93–596 effective Jan. 2, 1975, see section 4 of Pub. L. 93–596, set out as a note under section 1111 of this title.

#### Repeal and Effect on Existing Rights

Repeal of inconsistent provisions, effect of this chapter on pending proceedings and existing registrations and rights under prior acts, see notes set out under section 1051 of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of Commerce, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of Commerce, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 5, of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1263, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
# C_2007085EN.01001202.xml

| 19.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 85/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 85/12

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4589 — Delta Lloyd/Erasmus Groep)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2007/C 85/05)

On 23 March 2007, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4589. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32007M4589. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
#### § 367.2420 Account 242, Miscellaneous current and accrued liabilities.

This account must include the amount of all other current and accrued liabilities not provided for elsewhere, appropriately designated and supported so as to show the nature of each liability.
# Outreach, Diversity & Collaboration **Initiative** (OARM) Team Mission & Goals 2010**AA’s/Regional/Inter -**  **Agency**

**Career Planning &**  **Talent Sourcing**

**OHR Processes &**  **Improvements Community**  **& Internal Grps**  Collaboration

Outreach Diversity 

### Customer

**- facing**  **Approach**

OARM Internal Customers**AA’s/Regional/Inter -**  **Agency**

**Career Planning &**  **Talent Sourcing**

**OHR Processes &**  **Improvements Community**  **& Internal Grps**  **Technology** Collaboration

Outreach Diversity 

### Customer

**- facing**  **Initiatives**

OARM Internal Customers Potential Areas for joint work

### Initial Inquiry

EP A – AA ’s

External – Fed / Non - profits EP A - Regional**Internal Portal**  Accentuating/Celebrating EP A - specific best - in - class efforts And “Self - help” Leadership & Associate **hot -** **links External**  **Portal** Highlighting Community

- oriented efforts And practical **hot -** **links** to internal/external resourcesExploring the Use of **Social Media** for effective/measurable outreach efforts

### Diversity **, Outreach & Collaboration Initiative**
###### Editorial Note on Part 28

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear at 76 FR 76873, Dec. 9, 2011.

#### § 28.69 Judicial notice.

The administrative judge on their own motion or on motion of a party, may take judicial notice of a fact which is not subject to reasonable dispute because it is either: a matter of common knowledge; or a matter capable of accurate and ready determination by resort to sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned. Judicial notice taken of any fact satisfies a party's burden of proving the fact noticed.

[68 FR 69302, Dec. 12, 2003, as amended at 89 FR 51399, June 18, 2024]
§ 367.4280 Account 428, Amortization of debt discount and expense. ( a ) This account must include the amortization of unamortized debt discount and expense on outstanding long-term debt. Amounts charged to this account must be credited concurrently to accounts 181, Unamortized debt expense (§ 367.1810), and 226, Unamortized discount on long-term debt—Debit (§ 367.2260).
( b ) This account must be kept or supported so as to show the debt discount and expense on each class and series of long-term debt.
**Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 February 2012 — Commission v France**

**(Case C‐119/11)**

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2006/112/EC — Articles 99 and 110 — Value added tax — Reduced rate — Application of a reduced rate for admission to the first performances of concerts held in establishments providing refreshments
during the performance

Tax provisions — Harmonisation of laws — Turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax — Member States entitled to apply a reduced rate as a transitional measure — Reintroduction of a reduced rate of 2.10% for revenue from admission to first performances of concerts given in establishments
in which refreshments are served on request during the performance — Not permissible (Council Directive 2006/112, Arts 99 and 110) (see paras 30, 32, 37, operative part)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Articles 99 and 110 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1) — Application of a reduced rate of VAT of 2.10% for admission to the first performances of concerts given in establishments serving refreshments during the performance — Prohibition of extending the scope of an original derogation after reducing its ambit. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Declares that, by applying, since 1 January 2007, a reduced rate of value added tax of 2.10% to revenue from admission to the first performances of concerts given in establishments in which refreshments are served on request during the performance, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 99 and 110 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders the French Republic to pay the costs. |
#### § 367.8000 Accounts 800-894, Gas operation and maintenance accounts.

Service companies must use accounts 800 through 894 in part 201 of this chapter.
#### Benjamin Baker, an Infant, etc., Respondent, v. Interborough Rapid Transit Company, Appellant.

Judgment of the Municipal Court affirmed, with costs' No opinion. Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.
```
**CORRESPONDENCE**
                      Certification Pursuant to 906 by CFO

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Surgical Safety Products, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, R. Paul
Gray, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully compiles with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                                 /s/ R. Paul Gray
                                                     R. Paul Gray

                                                     Chief Financial Officer
                                                     Surgical Safety Products, Inc.
August 12, 2003
```
#### § 590.860 Identification wording.

The letters of the identification wording shall be legible and conspicuous.

[37 FR 6659, Apr. 1, 1972. Redesignated at 42 FR 32514, June 27, 1977, and further redesignated at 46 FR 63203, Dec. 31, 1981]