alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*William G. MacPhail, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 59851;

First District (2nd Division)

December 3, 1974.

James J. Doherty, Public Defender, of Chicago (Thomas F. Finegan, Assistant Public Defender, of counsel), for appellant.

Bernard Carey, State’s Attorney, of Chicago (Patrick T. Driscoll, Jr., Thomas D. Rafter, and Michael A. Tyrell, Assistant State’s Attorneys, of counsel), for the People.

PER CURIAM.
Exhibit 32
                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                           --------------------------
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             ----------------------


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Unitronix Corporation (the
"registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"),
we, Dale M. Hendrick and William C. Wimer, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, respectively, of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, that to our knowledge:

(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the report presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.

Date: January 10, 2005


/s/Dale M. Hendrick
-------------------
Dale M. Hendrick
Chief Executive Officer


/s/William C. Wimer
-------------------
William C. Wimer
Chief Financial Officer
Chart 82005 Average Fuel Consumption Rates by Aircraft Type4.515.917.261.221.5313.587.316.00 50 100 150 200 250 300 350Light-sportExperimentalOther AircraftRotorcraft: TurbineRotorcraft: PistonFixed Wing: TurbojetFixed Wing: TurbopropFixed Wing: Piston

Aircraft TypeGallons Per HourSource: 2005 GAATAA Survey Table 5.1Table 5.1Average Estimated Percent Average Estimated Percent Average Estimated PercentAIRCRAFT TYPERate Fuel Use Standard Rate Fuel Use Standard Rate Fuel Use StandardGPH (thous gal) Error GPH (thous gal) Error GPH (thous gal) ErrorFixed Wing: Piston 49.9 17,201.7 7.0 15.9 269,847.3 7.2 19.6 26,910.5 8.9Fixed Wing: Turboprop 93.6 180,624.2 1.7 24.7 1,902.1 7.6 35.3 136.1 15.1Fixed Wing: Turbojet 313.7 1,136,826.8 1.1 267.3 809.1 32.3 211.0 526.4 18.3Rotorcraft: Piston 28.4 369.4 22.1 22.0 11,774.7 14.0 13.9 392.0 16.9Rotorcraft: Turbine 62.7 141,013.4 4.3 31.8 1,292.8 19.2 12.9 7.3 21.6Other Aircraft * * * 11.3 260.1 23.0 * * *Experimental 166.1 31,407.3 15.8 11.2 8,976.6 5.6 16.9 805.2 63.1Light-sport * * * 5.1 7.7 9.3 5.0 0.6 16.3Total All Aircraft 175.9 1,507,442.8 1.2 15.7 294,870.4 6.5 19.5 28,778.0 8.6Table Notes:Beginning in 2004, commuter activity is excluded from all estimates. 2003 and prior, commuter activity was included in the AirTaxi use category.Columns may not add to totals due to rounding procedures.An asterisk indicates no active aircraft of that type reporting use of the fuel.Note that the fuel types are split across pages so that more detail can be reported.Jet Fuel Aviation Fuel: 100-Low Lead Aviation Fuel: 100 Octane2005 GENERAL AVIATIONTOTAL FUEL CONSUMED ANDAVERAGE FUEL CONSUMPTION RATEBY AIRCRAFT TYPEPage 5 - 1Table 5.1Average Estimated Percent Average Estimated Percent Average Estimated PercentAIRCRAFT TYPERate Fuel Use Standard Rate Fuel Use Standard Rate Fuel Use StandardGPH (thous gal) Error GPH (thous gal) Error GPH (thous gal) ErrorFixed Wing: Piston 10.5 8,794.6 8.4 7.0 35.7 65.6 16.0 322,789.8 6.1Fixed Wing: Turboprop 47.7 4.7 36.6 62.0 119.9 7.2 87.3 182,786.9 1.7Fixed Wing: Turbojet * * * * * * 313.5 1,138,162.3 1.1Rotorcraft: Piston 9.7 98.4 44.8 * * * 21.5 12,634.4 13.1Rotorcraft: Turbine * * * * * * 61.2 142,313.5 4.3Other Aircraft 6.0 9.0 0.0 17.3 2,295.3 8.4 17.2 2,564.4 10.5Experimental 5.8 1,671.0 8.7 17.5 431.5 97.7 15.9 43,291.5 22.2Light-sport 4.4 33.2 7.4 * * * 4.5 41.5 6.2Total All Aircraft 8.9 10,610.8 7.5 17.0 2,882.4 17.4 33.1 1,844,584.5 2.7Table Notes:Beginning in 2004, commuter activity is excluded from all estimates. 2003 and prior, commuter activity was included in the AirTaxi use category.Columns may not add to totals due to rounding procedures.An asterisk indicates no active aircraft of that type reporting use of the fuel.Note that the fuel types are split across pages so that more detail can be reported.Automotive Gasoline Other Fuel Total Fuel Use2005 GENERAL AVIATIONTOTAL FUEL CONSUMED ANDAVERAGE FUEL CONSUMPTION RATEBY AIRCRAFT TYPEPage 5 - 2
### §6604. Punitive damages limitations

#### (a) In general

In any Y2K action in which punitive damages are permitted by applicable law, the defendant shall not be liable for punitive damages unless the plaintiff proves by clear and convincing evidence that the applicable standard for awarding damages has been met.

#### (b) Caps on punitive damages

#### (1) In general

Subject to the evidentiary standard established by subsection (a), punitive damages permitted under applicable law against a defendant described in paragraph (2) in a Y2K action may not exceed the lesser of—

(A) three times the amount awarded for compensatory damages; or

(B) $250,000.

#### (2) Defendant described

A defendant described in this paragraph is a defendant—

(A) who—

(i) is sued in his or her capacity as an individual; and

(ii) whose net worth does not exceed $500,000; or

(B) that is an unincorporated business, a partnership, corporation, association, or organization, with fewer than 50 full-time employees.

#### (3) No cap if injury specifically intended

Paragraph (1) does not apply if the plaintiff establishes by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant acted with specific intent to injure the plaintiff.

#### (c) Government entities

Punitive damages in a Y2K action may not be awarded against a government entity.

#### (d) Institutions of higher education

#### (1) In general

Subject to paragraph (2), punitive damages in a Y2K action may not be awarded against an instituion 1 of higher education as defined in section 1001(a) of title 20.

#### (2) Exception

Paragraph (1) shall not apply to an institution of higher education if the Y2K failure in the Y2K action occurred in a computer-based student financial aid system of that institution of higher education, and the institution—

(A) has passed Y2K data exchange testing with the Department of Education; or

(B) is not or was not in the process of performing data exchange testing with the Department of Education at the time the Department terminates such testing.

(Pub. L. 106–37, §5, July 20, 1999, 113 Stat. 192; Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(4) [title III, §311], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1535, 1501A–265.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1999—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 106–113 added subsec. (d).

1 So in original. Probably should be "institution".
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          19,617
<SECURITIES>                                       891
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,842
<ALLOWANCES>                                       500
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,957
<PP&E>                                          46,745
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,357
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  60,395
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,440
<BONDS>                                          6,700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     11,450
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,790
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    60,395
<SALES>                                         11,112
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,112
<CGS>                                            9,690
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,690
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,153
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (448)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,179)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,179)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.41)


</TABLE>
### §4724. Trade shows

#### (a) Authority of Secretary of Commerce

In order to facilitate exporting by United States businesses, the Secretary of Commerce shall provide assistance for trade shows in the United States which bring together representatives of United States businesses seeking to export goods or services produced in the United States and representatives of foreign companies or governments seeking to buy such goods or services from these United States businesses.

#### (b) Recipients of assistance

Assistance under subsection (a) may be provided to—

(1) nonprofit industry organizations,

(2) trade associations,

(3) foreign trade zones, and

(4) private industry firms or groups of firms in cases where no entity described in paragraph (1), (2), or (3) represents that industry,

to provide the services necessary to operate trade shows described in subsection (a).

#### (c) Assistance to small businesses

In providing assistance under this section, the Secretary of Commerce shall, in consultation with the Administrator of the Small Business Administration, make special efforts to facilitate participation by small businesses and companies new to export.

#### (d) Uses of assistance

Funds appropriated to carry out this section shall be used to—

(1) identify potential participants for trade show organizers,

(2) provide information on trade shows to potential participants,

(3) supply language services for participants, and

(4) provide information on trade shows to small businesses and companies new to export.

#### (e) Definitions

As used in this section—

(1) the term "United States business" means—

(A) a United States citizen;

(B) a corporation, partnership, or other association created under the laws of the United States or of any State (including the District of Columbia or any commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United States); or

(C) a foreign corporation, partnership, or other association, more than 95 percent of which is owned by persons described in subparagraphs (A) and (B); and

(2) the term "small business" means any small business concern as defined under section 632 of this title.

(Pub. L. 100–418, title II, §2304, Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1343.)
#### § 354.32 Filing of application.

An application for inspection service shall be regarded as filed only when made pursuant to the regulations in this part.
# C_2013055EN.01000902.xml

| 23.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/9

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 January 2013 — Aiscat v Commission

(Case T-182/10) (1)

1

(State aid - Direct concession for the construction and subsequent management of a section of motorway - Decision to take no further action on the complaint - Action for annulment - Actionable measure - Locus standi - Individual concern - Admissibility - Definition of aid - State resources)

2013/C 55/14

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Associazione italiana delle società concessionarie per la costruzione e l’esercizio di autostrade e trafori stradali (Aiscat) (Rome, Italy) (represented by: M. Maresca, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Rossi and D. Grespan, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Concessioni Autostradali Venete — CAV SpA (represented by: C. Malinconico and P. Clarizia, lawyers)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for the annulment of the Commission’s decision of 10 February 2010 rejecting a complaint lodged by the applicant concerning the alleged unlawful State aid granted by the Italian Republic to CAV.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders Associazione italiana delle società concessionarie per la costruzione e l’esercizio di autostrade e trafori stradali (Aiscat) to bear half of its own costs and to pay half of the costs incurred by the European Commission and all of the costs incurred by Concessioni autostradali Venete — CAV SpA. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Associazione italiana delle società concessionarie per la costruzione e l’esercizio di autostrade e trafori stradali (Aiscat) to bear half of its own costs and to pay half of the costs incurred by the European Commission and all of the costs incurred by Concessioni autostradali Venete — CAV SpA.

| 3. | Orders the Commission to bear half of its own costs and to pay half of the costs incurred by Aiscat. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Commission to bear half of its own costs and to pay half of the costs incurred by Aiscat.

---

(1)  OJ C 161, 19.6.2010.

1

---
§ 1308.21 Jurisdiction and organization. ( a ) The Board shall consider and determine timely appeals filed by Contractors from decisions of TVA Contracting Officers pursuant to a disputes clause.
( b ) The Board shall consist of an indeterminate number of members, who shall serve on a part-time basis. The members of the Board shall all be attorneys at law duly licensed by any state, commonwealth, territory, or the District of Columbia. One of the members of the Board shall be designated as “Chairman” pursuant to section 8(b)(2) of the Act.
( c ) Each appeal or other matter before the Board shall normally be assigned to a single Hearing Officer, to be designated by the Chairman. The Chairman may act as a Hearing Officer, and shall notify the Contractor and TVA of the name and mailing address of the person designated as Hearing Officer.
( d ) If a member to whom an appeal has been assigned cannot perform in a timely manner the duties of Hearing Officer, because of unavailability or incapacity which would in the Chairman's judgment affect the expeditious and timely resolution of the appeal, or for any other reason deemed sufficient by the Chairman, the Chairman may take any action deemed appropriate to effectuate the disposition of the appeal and the rights of the parties under this part. The kind of action taken, and the manner thereof, shall be within the discretion of the Chairman, and may include, but is not limited to, action on pending motions, discovery, issuance of or ruling on objections to subpoenas, and reassignment of an appeal in whole or in part.
# 07-10-2013

Folks in RoomW12-140

I request an extension ofmyExemptionNo. 7930Dfrom 14 CFR (FAR Section) Part 91 109 (a)-- Doc.ket numberFAA-2002-13712

.. I continue to provide an experienced safe training environmentinthe throw overcontrol wheel Beechcraftmodels 33, 35, and 36. Sincerely, KerrickR. Philleo, certificate number 1573855CFII**~----------------------~-~~----------------------** Date: 07/01/2013 Exemption No: 79300 from 14 CFR (FAR Section)- Part: 91.109 (a) will expire on 12/31/2013. Ifappropriate, please submit your request to extend this exemption (including the docket number FAA-2002-13712) within 30 days of the date ofthis notice. Otherwise, the FAA may not be able to process your request for extension before the expiration date. You may either submit your request electronically through the internet using the Docket Management System web site at: http://Regulations.gov/ or mail your request to: U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Operations, M-30 West Building groundfloor, Room W12-140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Submission to other locations may delay processing. Any request for extension must meetthe requirements of 14 CFR part 11. If you have already requested an extension for this exemption or no longer need this exemption, please ignore this notice. 016H265.22091
#### § 533.3 Facilities for Program employees.

Office space, including necessary furnishings, light, heat, and janitor service, must be provided by official establishments, rent free, for the exclusive use for official purposes of the inspector and other Program employees assigned thereto. The space set aside for this purpose shall meet with approval of the District Manager or the frontline supervisor and must be conveniently located, properly ventilated, and provided with lockers suitable for the protection and storage of Program supplies and with facilities suitable for Program employees to change clothing if such facilities are deemed necessary by the frontline supervisor. At the discretion of the Administrator, small establishments requiring the services of less than one full-time inspector need not furnish facilities for Program employees as prescribed in this section, where adequate facilities exist in a nearby convenient location. Laundry service for inspectors' outer work clothing must be provided by each establishment.
#### Catherine Kenney, Respondent, v. The Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Present — Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor and Miller, JJ.
#### § 1313.151 Program accessibility: New construction and alterations.

Each building or part of a building that is constructed or altered by, on behalf of, or for the use of the agency shall be designed, constructed, or altered so as to be readily accessible to and usable by handicapped persons. The definitions, requirements, and standards of the Architectural Barriers Act (42 U.S.C. 4151-4157), as established in 41 CFR 101-19.600 to 101-19.607, apply to buildings covered by this section.
#### Harriet L. Luther et al., Appellants, *v.*Guaranty Trust Company of New York, as Trustee under a Deed of Trust between Edward S. Luther and Guaranty Trust Company of New York, Respondent.

First Department,

June 22, 1943.

*355
      *Jacob 1. Goodstein*for appellants.

*Otis T. Bradley*of counsel *(E. E. Peterson*with him on the brief; *Davis Polk Wardwell Gardiner S Reed,*attorneys), for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

We think the evidence sufficiently sustains the referee’s finding denying surcharge. But the case was greatly overtried and the expenses of over $18,000 imposed upon plaintiffs, who brought the action in entire good faith, are grossly excessive. To pay such expenses it will be necessary to sell a part of the securities which form the sole liquid assets of the trust.

While it was necessary to make some preparation for testimony on other properties (as to which objections were not withdrawn by plaintiffs until after the trial had started) it was not reasonably necessary to retain so many separate real estate experts to prepare to testify on the same properties. Except for the defendant’s two real estate appraisers who testified at the trial, there is no affidavit by any other expert appraiser to show the extent of the services; the statements they prepared are not even submitted. Accordingly, no allowance whatever should be made payable out of the estate for retaining the additional real estate experts except a reasonable allowance for the services of the construction engineers who prepared to testify as to the construction value of one of the properties. We think, too, that the allowances to defendant’s counsel and the referee were too liberal.

Allowances made should be reduced as follows — to the defendant’s two real estate appraisers who actually testified at the trial and prepared on other properties $600 each for all services; to the construction engineers who prepared to testify $250; to defendant’s counsel for all services and disbursements $3,014.81; and to the referee $1,500.

The stenographer’s fees should be allowed and the other disbursements of defendant, except as disallowed or reduced herein.

The judgment appealed from should be modified accordingly, and as so modified affirmed, without costs.

Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Carra han, JJ., concur.

Judgment unanimously modified in accordance with opinion, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Settle order on notice.
§ 95.36 Transportation of restricted import products; placarding cars and marking billing; unloading enroute. ( a ) Transportation companies or other operators of cars, trucks or other vehicles carrying import products or materials moving under restriction, other than those in tight cases or casks, shall affix to and maintain on both sides of all such vehicles durable placards not less than 51 ⁄ 2 by 6 inches in size, on which shall be printed with permanent black ink and in boldface letters not less than 11 ⁄ 2 inches in height the words “Restricted import product.” These placards shall also bear the words “Clean and disinfect this car or truck.” Each of the waybills, conductors' manifests, memoranda, and bills of lading pertaining to such shipments shall have the words “Restricted import product, clean and disinfect car or truck,” plainly written or stamped upon its face. If for any reason the placards required by this section have not been affixed to each car, or the billing has not been marked by the initial or the connecting carrier, or the placards have been removed, destroyed, or rendered illegible, the placards shall be immediately affixed or replaced and the billing marked by the initial or connecting carrier, the intention being that the billing accompanying the shipment shall be marked and each car, truck or other vehicle placarded as specified in this section from the time such shipment leaves the port of entry until it is unloaded at final destination and the cars, trucks or other vehicles are cleaned and disinfected as required by § 95.37.
( b ) If it is necessary to unload enroute any of the materials or products transported in a placarded car, truck or other vehicle as provided in this section, the car, truck or other vehicle from which the transfer is made and any part of the premises in or upon which the product or material may have been placed in the course of unloading or reloading shall be cleaned and disinfected by the carrier, in accordance with the provisions of § 95.37, and the said carrier shall immediately report the matter, by telegraph, to the Deputy Administrator, Veterinary Services, Washington, DC 20251. Such report shall include the following information: Nature of emergency; place where product or material was unloaded; original points of shipment and destination; number and materials of the original car or truck; and number and initials of the car, truck or other vehicle into which the product or material is reloaded in case the original car or truck is not used.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0015) [28 FR 5981, June 13, 1963, as amended at 48 FR 57472, Dec. 30, 1983. Redesignated and amended at 78 FR 73003, 73007, Dec. 4, 2013]
#### §§ 1313.112-1313.129 [Reserved]