Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 154 / Thursday, August 9, 2012 / Proposed Rules 47581 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2012–0311; FRL–9687–2] 

Revisions to the California State 

Implementation Plan, Sacramento 

Metropolitan Air Quality Management 

District 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve 

revisions to the Sacramento 

Metropolitan Air Quality Management 

District (SMAQMD) portion of the 

California State Implementation Plan 

(SIP). This revision concerns the 

definition of volatile organic 

compounds (VOC). We are approving a 

local rule that helps regulate VOCs 

under the Clean Air Act, as amended 

(CAA or the Act). 

DATES: Any comments on this proposal 

must arrive by September 10, 2012. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, 

identified by docket number EPA–R09– 

OAR–2012–0311, by one of the 

following methods: 

1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line 

instructions. 

2. Email: steckel.andrew@epa.gov. 

3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel 

(Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, 

San Francisco, CA 94105–3901. 

Instructions: All comments will be 

included in the public docket without 

change and may be made available 

online at www.regulations.gov, 

including any personal information 

provided, unless the comment includes 

Confidential Business Information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Information that 

you consider CBI or otherwise protected 

should be clearly identified as such and 

should not be submitted through 

www.regulations.gov or email. 

www.regulations.gov is an ‘‘anonymous 

access’’ system, and EPA will not know 

your identity or contact information 

unless you provide it in the body of 

your comment. If you send email 

directly to EPA, your email address will 

be automatically captured and included 

as part of the public comment. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. 

Docket: Generally, documents in the 

docket for this action are available 

electronically at www.regulations.gov 

and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75 

Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, 

California. While all documents in the 

docket are listed at 

www.regulations.gov, some information 

may be publicly available only at the 

hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted 

material, large maps), and some may not 

be publicly available in either location 

(e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy 

materials, please schedule an 

appointment during normal business 

hours with the contact listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Cynthia G. Allen, EPA Region IX, (415) 

947–4120, allen.cynthia@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

proposal addresses the following local 

rule: Rule 101. In the Rules and 

Regulations section of this Federal 

Register, we are approving this local 

rule in a direct final action without 

prior proposal because we believe this 

SIP revision is not controversial. If we 

receive adverse comments, however, we 

will publish a timely withdrawal of the 

direct final rule and address the 

comments in subsequent action based 

on this proposed rule. Please note that 

if we receive adverse comment on an 

amendment, paragraph, or section of 

this rule and if that provision may be 

severed from the remainder of the rule, 

we may adopt as final those provisions 

of the rule that are not the subject of an 

adverse comment. 

We do not plan to open a second 

comment period, so anyone interested 

in commenting should do so at this 

time. If we do not receive adverse 

comments, no further activity is 

planned. For further information, please 

see the direct final action. 

Dated: May 10, 2012. 

Jared Blumeneld, 

Regional Administrator, Region IX. 

[FR Doc. 2012–19314 Filed 8–8–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2012–0332; FRL–9687–7] 

Revisions to the California State 

Implementation Plan, Mojave Desert, 

Northern Sierra, Sacramento 

Metropolitan and San Diego Air 

Pollution Agencies 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve 

revisions to the Mojave Desert Air 

Quality Management District 

(MDAQMD), Northern Sierra Air 

Quality Management District 

(NSAQMD), Sacramento Metropolitan 

Air Quality Management District 

(SMAQMD) and San Diego County Air 

Pollution Control District (SDCAPCD) 

portions of the California State 

Implementation Plan (SIP). These 

revisions concern volatile organic 

compound (VOC) emissions from 

automotive parts and component, 

automobile refinishing, metal parts and 

products, and miscellaneous coating 

and refinishing operations. We are 

proposing to approve local rules to 

regulate these emission sources under 

the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 

(CAA or the Act). 

DATES: Any comments on this proposal 

must arrive by September 10, 2012. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, 

identified by docket number R09–OAR– 

2012–0332, by one of the following 

methods: 

1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line 

instructions. 

2. Email: steckel.andrew@epa.gov. 

3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel 

(Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, 

San Francisco, CA 94105–3901. 

Instructions: All comments will be 

included in the public docket without 

change and may be made available 

online at www.regulations.gov, 

including any personal information 

provided, unless the comment includes 

Confidential Business Information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Information that 

you consider CBI or otherwise protected 

should be clearly identified as such and 

should not be submitted through 

www.regulations.gov or email. 

www.regulations.gov is an ‘‘anonymous 

access’’ system, and EPA will not know 

your identity or contact information 

unless you provide it in the body of 

your comment. If you send email 

directly to EPA, your email address will 

be automatically captured and included 

as part of the public comment. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. 

Docket: Generally, documents in the 

docket for this action are available 

electronically at www.regulations.gov 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

47582 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 154 / Thursday, August 9, 2012 / Proposed Rules 

and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75 

Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, 

California. While all documents in the 

docket are listed at 

www.regulations.gov, some information 

may be publicly available only at the 

hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted 

material, large maps), and some may not 

be publicly available in either location 

(e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy 

materials, please schedule an 

appointment during normal business 

hours with the contact listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Andy Steckel, EPA Region IX, (415) 

947–4115, Steckel.andrew@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

proposal addresses the following local 

rules: MDAQMD Rule 1116, Automotive 

Refinishing Operations; NSAQMD Rule 

228, Surface Coating and Metal Parts 

and Products; SMAQMD Rule 459, 

Automotive, Mobile Equipment and 

Associated Parts and Components 

Coating, and SDCAPCD Rule 66.1, 

Miscellaneoous Coating. In the Rules 

and Regulations section of this Federal 

Register, we are approving these local 

rules in a direct final action without 

prior proposal because we believe these 

SIP revisions are not controversial. If we 

receive adverse comments, however, we 

will publish a timely withdrawal of the 

direct final rule and address the 

comments in subsequent action based 

on this proposed rule. Please note that 

if we receive adverse comment on an 

amendment, paragraph, or section of 

this rule and if that provision may be 

severed from the remainder of the rule, 

we may adopt as final those provisions 

of the rule that are not the subject of an 

adverse comment. 

We do not plan to open a second 

comment period, so anyone interested 

in commenting should do so at this 

time. If we do not receive adverse 

comments, no further activity is 

planned. For further information, please 

see the direct final action. 

Dated: May 22, 2012. 

Jared Blumenfeld, 

Regional Administrator, Region IX. 

[FR Doc. 2012–19316 Filed 8–8–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

46 CFR Part 401 

[Docket No. USCG–2012–0409] 

RIN 1625–AB89 

Great Lakes Pilotage Rates—2013 

Annual Review and Adjust; Correction 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; 

correction. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard published a 

Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 

in the Federal Register on August 1, 

2012 (77 FR 45539) proposing rate 

adjustments for pilotage services on the 

Great Lakes. The charge rate, as listed in 

§ 401.407, Area 5 (Designated Waters) of 

that NPRM, is incorrect. 

DATES: The notice of proposed 

rulemaking published in the Federal 

Register on August 1, 2012 (77 FR 

45539) is corrected as of August 9, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this rule, call or 

email Mr. Todd Haviland, Management 

& Program Analyst, Office of Great 

Lakes Pilotage, Commandant (CG– 

WWM–2), U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 

202–372–1909, email 

todd.a.haviland@uscg.mil. If you have 

questions on viewing the docket, call 

Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, 

Docket Operations, telephone 202–366– 

9826. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

NPRM published August 1, 2012 (77 FR 

45539) contains an inaccurate value on 

page 45558. This correction amends row 

3, column 5 of the table below in 

instruction (3) of the NPRM. The Coast 

Guard is republishing the table to 

correct the error. 

Correction 

In proposed rule FR Doc. 2012–18714, 

beginning on page 45539 in the issue of 

August 1, 2012, make the following 

correction. On page 45558, in, 

§ 401.407, revise paragraph (b), 

including the footnote to Table (b), to 

read as follows: 

§ 401.407 Basic rates and charges on Lake 

Erie and the navigable waters from 

Southeast Shoal to Port Huron, MI. 

* * * * * 

(b) Area 5 (Designated Waters): 

Any point on or in Southeast 

Shoal 

Toledo or any 

point on Lake 

Erie west of 

Southeast 

Shoal 

Detroit River Detroit Pilot 

Boat St. Clair River 

Toledo or any port on Lake Erie west of Southeast Shoal $2,339 $1,382 $3,037 $2,339 N/A 

Port Huron Change Point .................................................... 1 4,074 1 4,719 3,060 2,381 1,693 

St. Clair River ....................................................................... 1 4,074 N/A 3,060 3,060 1,382 

Detroit or Windsor or the Detroit River ................................ 2,339 3,037 1,382 N/A 3,060 

Detroit Pilot Boat .................................................................. 1,693 2,339 N/A N/A 3,060 

1When pilots are not changed at the Detroit Pilot Boat. 

Dated: August 2, 2012. 

Kathryn Sinniger, 

Chief, Office of Regulations and 

Administrative Law, U.S. Coast Guard. 

[FR Doc. 2012–19348 Filed 8–8–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS