alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF LOSS AND ACCUMULATED DEFICIT AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE  TO SUCH 10QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED July
31, 2000.


<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          Apr-30-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               Jul-31-2000
<CASH>                                            1808
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1808
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1808
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1306
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         11935
<OTHER-SE>                                      (11433)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1808
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1525
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (1525)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (1525)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.00)



</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

I, Raymond L. Durham, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of CellStar Corporation; and 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. 

 

/s/ Raymond L.Durham                                    

Raymond L. Durham, Chief Financial Officer 

 

Date: September 24, 2004
### §70h. Guaranty

#### (a) Avoidance of liability; requirements

No person shall be guilty of an unlawful act under section 70a of this title if he establishes a guaranty received in good faith, signed by and containing the name and address of the person residing in the United States by whom the textile fiber product guaranteed was manufactured or from whom it was received, that said product is not misbranded or falsely invoiced under the provisions of this subchapter. Said guaranty shall be (1) a separate guaranty specifically designating the textile fiber product guaranteed, in which case it may be on the invoice or other paper relating to said product; or (2) a continuing guaranty given by seller to the buyer applicable to all textile fiber products sold to or to be sold to buyer by seller in a form as the Commission, by rules and regulations, may prescribe; or (3) a continuing guaranty filed with the Commission applicable to all textile fiber products handled by a guarantor in such form as the Commission by rules and regulations may prescribe.

#### (b) Furnishing false guaranty

The furnishing of a false guaranty, except where the person furnishing such false guaranty relies on a guaranty to the same effect received in good faith signed by and containing the name and address of the person residing in the United States by whom the product guaranteed was manufactured or from whom it was received, is unlawful, and shall be an unfair method of competition, and an unfair and deceptive act or practice, in commerce, within the meaning of the Federal Trade Commission Act [15 U.S.C. 41 et seq.].

(Pub. L. 85–897, §10, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1722.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal Trade Commission Act, referred to in subsec. (b), is act Sept. 26, 1914, ch. 311, 38 Stat. 717, which is classified generally to subchapter I (§41 et seq.) of this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 58 of this title and Tables.
Exhibit 10.68

Confidential treatment has been requested for portions of this exhibit and such portions have been filed separately with the Commission. The copy filed herewith omits the information for which
confidential treatment has been requested and replaces it with [***].

Amendment of Statement of Work (SOW3)

Between Elektrobit, Inc. (EB) and TerreStar, Inc. (TSN), dated as of the
20thday of October, 2009

The undersigned parties agree as follows:



| | 1. | EB and TSN entered into a SOW3 on October 20, 2009.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The SOW3 has a not-to-exceed amount for the services and expenses of $16,545,492 USD
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | With this Amendment of SOW3 (Amendment) the parties increase the SOW3 not-to-exceed amount by $5,276,154 USD [***].
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 4. | Therefore, EB and TSN hereby agree to replace the not-to-exceed amount of $16,545,492 USD in Section 10 of SOW3 with the not-to-exceed amount of $21,821,646 USD.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 5. | By [***].
| | -- | ---------



| | 6. | No other terms of the SOW3 are changed or amended and all terms contained in the SOW3 remain in full force and effect.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties here to have caused this Amendment to be executed by their respective duly authorizes representatives as of the last date
written below (the Effective Date)



|                        |  |                    |  |                 |  |        |  |                 
|----------------------- |  | ------------------ |  | --------------- |  | ------ |  | ----------------
|TerreStar Networks Inc. |  |                    |  | Elektrobit Inc.
|                        |  |                    |  |                
|By:                     |  |                    |  |                 |  | By:    |  |                 
|Name:                   |  | Jeffrey W. Epstein |  |                 |  | Name:  |  | Jani Lyrintzis  
|Title:                  |  | President          |  |                 |  | Title: |  | VP & GM         
|Date:                   |  | January 21, 2010   |  |                 |  | Date:  |  | January 22, 2010
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Mark L Abbate, hereby certify that:

(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Service Bancorp, Inc.;

(2) Based on my knowledge,
this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4) The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
for the small business issuer and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuers most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and

(5) The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal controls over financial reporting.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ MARK L. ABBATE     
|Mark L. Abbate         
|Chief Financial Officer
|February 14, 2008
# C_2011194EN.01000802.xml

| 2.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 194/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 194/8

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 14 March 2011 — UsedSoft GmbH v Oracle International Corp.

(Case C-128/11)

2011/C 194/11

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: UsedSoft GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Oracle International Corp.

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Is the person who can rely on exhaustion of the right to distribute a copy of a computer program a ‘lawful acquirer’ within the meaning of Article 5(1) of Directive 2009/24/EC? (1) |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is the person who can rely on exhaustion of the right to distribute a copy of a computer program a ‘lawful acquirer’ within the meaning of Article 5(1) of Directive 2009/24/EC? (1)

1

| 2. | If the reply to the first question is in the affirmative: is the right to distribute a copy of a computer program exhausted in accordance with the first half-sentence of Article 4(2) of Directive 2009/24/EC when the acquirer has made the copy with the rightholder’s consent by downloading the program from the internet onto a data carrier? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the reply to the first question is in the affirmative: is the right to distribute a copy of a computer program exhausted in accordance with the first half-sentence of Article 4(2) of Directive 2009/24/EC when the acquirer has made the copy with the rightholder’s consent by downloading the program from the internet onto a data carrier?

| 3. | If the reply to the second question is also in the affirmative: can a person who has acquired a ‘used’ software licence for generating a program copy as ‘lawful acquirer’ under Article 5(1) and the first half-sentence of Article 4(2) of Directive 2009/24 also rely on exhaustion of the right to distribute the copy of the computer program made by the first acquirer with the rightholder’s consent by downloading the program from the internet onto a data carrier if the first acquirer has erased his program copy or no longer uses it? |
| --- | --- |

3.

If the reply to the second question is also in the affirmative: can a person who has acquired a ‘used’ software licence for generating a program copy as ‘lawful acquirer’ under Article 5(1) and the first half-sentence of Article 4(2) of Directive 2009/24 also rely on exhaustion of the right to distribute the copy of the computer program made by the first acquirer with the rightholder’s consent by downloading the program from the internet onto a data carrier if the first acquirer has erased his program copy or no longer uses it?

---

(1)  Directive 2009/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the legal protection of computer programs (Codified version) (OJ 2009 L 111, p. 16).

1

---
#### § 367.4073 Account 407.3, Regulatory debits.

This account shall be debited, when appropriate, with amounts credited to Account 254, Other Regulatory Liabilities, to record regulatory liabilities imposed on the service company by the ratemaking actions of regulatory agencies. This account shall also be debited, when appropriate, with the amounts credited to Account 182.3, Other Regulatory Assets, concurrent with the recovery of such amounts in rates.
### §322. Odd jobs for part-time employees

National Weather Service part-time employees, appointed by designation or otherwise under regulations of the Director of the Office of Personnel Management for observational work, may perform odd jobs in the installation, repair, improvement, alteration, cleaning, or removal of Government property and receive compensation therefor under regulations to be prescribed by the Secretary of Commerce.

(July 1, 1943, ch. 182, title III, 57 Stat. 300; 1965 Reorg. Plan No. 2, eff. July 13, 1965, 30 F.R. 8819, 79 Stat. 1318; 1970 Reorg. Plan No. 4, eff. Oct. 3, 1970, 35 F.R. 15627, 84 Stat. 2090; 1978 Reorg. Plan No. 2, §102, 43 F.R. 36037, 92 Stat. 3783.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Similar Provisions

Section is from the Departments of State, Justice, and Commerce Appropriation Act, 1944. Similar provisions were contained in the following appropriation acts:

July 2, 1942, ch. 472, title III, 56 Stat. 500.

June 28, 1941, ch. 258, title II, 55 Stat. 289.

June 25, 1940, ch. 421, 54 Stat. 539.

June 30, 1939, ch. 253, title I, 53 Stat. 947.

June 16, 1938, ch. 464, title I, 52 Stat. 718.

June 29, 1937, ch. 404, 50 Stat. 403.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

"Director of the Office of Personnel Management" substituted in text for "Civil Service Commission" pursuant to Reorg. Plan No. 2 of 1978, set out under section 1101 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, which transferred functions vested by statute in Civil Service Commission to Director of Office of Personnel Management (except as otherwise specified), effective Jan. 1, 1979, as provided by section 1–102 of Ex. Ord. No. 12107, Dec. 28, 1978, 44 F.R. 1055, set out under section 1101 of Title 5.

Weather Bureau consolidated with Coast and Geodetic Survey to form new agency in Department of Commerce known as Environmental Science Services Administration by Reorg. Plan No. 2 of 1965, eff. July 13, 1965, 30 F.R. 8819, 79 Stat. 1318, set out as a note under section 311 of this title. Functions of Bureau and Chief of Bureau transferred to Secretary of Commerce by Reorg. Plan. Subsequently, Environmental Science Services Administration abolished and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration established. By Department Organization Order 25–5A, Secretary delegated to NOAA his functions under this chapter of the Code. By order of Acting Associate Administrator of NOAA, organizational name of Weather Bureau changed to National Weather Service. For further details, see Codification note set out under section 311 of this title.
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****NASA spacebiology accomplishments**** 
SuDocNumber:NAS1.15:
ItemNumber:0830-D
CGPSystem Number:000440183
 
1982
1983-1984
1989-1990
1990-1991
1992-1993
 **
(67 South. 950)

No. 20861.

#### STATE v. JOLIFF.

(Feb. 23, 1915.

Rehearing Denied March 22, 1915.)

Appeal from First Judicial District Court, Parish of Oaddo; J. R. Land, Judge.

George JolifE was convicted of violating an ordinance of a police jury, and appeals.

Reversed, and defendant ordered discharged.

Scheen & Blanchard and E. P. Mills, all of Shreveport, for appellant. R. G. Pleasant, Atty. Gen., and W. A. Mabry, Dist. Atty., of Shreveport (G. A. Gondran, of New Orleans, of counsel), for the State.

MONROE, C. J.

This case presents the same questions that are presented in the cases of State v. Hagen, 67 South. 935,1 and State v. Whitbeck and Harris, 67 South. 949,2 this day decided, and is governed by the same principles of law. For the reasons assigned in those cases, therefore, the conviction and sentence herein appealed from are set aside, and the defendant ^ordered to be discharged.

PROYOSTY, LAND, and O’NIELL, JJ., concur in the decree on the ground that the police jury was without authority to pass the ordinance in question.

O’NIELL, J., is of the opinion that this court is without jurisdiction of the appeal, for the reasons assigned in his dissenting opinion in the case of State v. Hagen, 67 South. 942, decided this day.

1

Ante, p. 868.

2

Ante, p. 896.
FAA-AM-79-20

EFFECTS OF OZONE ON EXERCISING AND SEDENTARY ADULT MEN AND

WOMEN REPRESENTATIVE OF THE FLIGHT ATTENDANT POPULATION

E. A. Higgins

M. T. Lategola

J. M. McKenzie

C. E. Melton

J. A. Vaughan

Civil Aeromedical Institute

Federal Aviation Administration

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

October 1979

Document is available to the public through the

National Technical Information Service,

Springfield, Virginia 22161

Prepared For

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

Office of Aviation Medicine

Washington, D.C. 20591
NOTICE

This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of

Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States

Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof.
# C_2013108EN.01000401.xml

| 13.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/4

---

Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 November 2012 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský súd v Prešove — Slovakia) — SKP k.s. v Kveta Polhošová

(Case C-433/11) (1)

1

(Request for a preliminary ruling - Lack of adequate information on the factual and legal context of the dispute in the main proceedings - Questions submitted in a context which precludes any useful answer - Lack of information on the reasons justifying the need for a reply to the questions referred - Manifest inadmissibility)

2013/C 108/06

Language of the case: Slovak

Referring court

Referring court

Krajský súd v Prešove

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: SKP k.s.

Applicant:

Defendant: Kveta Polhošová

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Krajský súd v Prešove — Interpretation of Articles 5 to 9 of Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market and amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC, Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (‘Unfair Commercial Practices Directive’) (OJ 2005 L 149, p. 22), Articles 6(1) and 7(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29), and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Concept of unfair commercial practice — Contract for the sale of goods by hire purchase concluded with a consumer and containing an unfair term — Assignment by the undertaking of the claim under the contract to a bankrupt company, making it impossible for the consumer to recover the costs of legal proceedings if she wins the case

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling submitted by the Krajský súd v Prešove (Slovakia), by decision of 10 August 2011, is manifestly inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 340, 19.11.2011.

1

---
§ 93.703 Ports designated for importation. ( a ) Any person importing a hedgehog or tenrec into the United States may import it, except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, only through the following ports: ( 1 ) *Air and ocean ports.* Anchorage and Fairbanks, AK; San Diego and Los Angeles, CA; Denver, CO; Jacksonville, Miami, St. Petersburg-Clearwater, and Tampa, FL; Atlanta, GA; Chicago, IL; New Orleans, LA; Portland, ME; Baltimore, MD; Boston, MA; Minneapolis, MN; Great Falls, MT; Newburgh, NY; Portland, OR; San Juan, PR; Galveston and Houston, TX; and Seattle, Spokane, and Tacoma, WA.
( 2 ) *Canadian border ports.* Eastport, ID; Houlton and Jackman, ME; Detroit, Port Huron, and Sault Ste. Marie, MI; Opheim, Raymond, and Sweetgrass, MT; Alexandria Bay, Buffalo, and Champlain, NY; Dunseith, Pembina, and Portal, ND; Derby Line and Highgate Springs, VT; Oroville and Sumas, WA.
( 3 ) *Mexican border ports.* Douglas, Naco, Nogales, Sasabe, and San Luis, AZ; Calexico and San Ysidro, CA; Antelope Wells, and Columbus, NM; and Brownsville, Hidalgo, Laredo, Eagle Pass, Del Rio, Presidio, and El Paso, TX.
( b ) The Secretary of the Treasury has approved the designation, as inspection stations, of the ports specified in paragraph (a) of this section. In special cases, the Administrator may designate other ports as inspection stations in accordance with this section, with the concurrence of the Secretary of the Treasury.
[60 FR 55181, Oct. 30, 1995. Redesignated at 62 FR 56012, Oct. 28, 1997, as amended at 65 FR 38178, June 20, 2000; 67 FR 68022, Nov. 8, 2002]