alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MAKE REGULAR CONVERSATIONS 

PART OF THE ROUTINE.

Know the risks of underage drinking and be prepared to 

talk about them.

Establishing yourself as a trustworthy source of information on 

alcohol will make your child more inclined to ask questions and 

look to you for support and guidance. For tips on how—and 

when—to begin the conversation, visit 

www.underagedrinking.samhsa.gov

#TalkTheyHearYou PEP20-03-01-028
Editorial Note on Part 28
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear at 76 FR 76873, Dec. 9, 2011.

§ 28.8 Informal procedural advice. ( a ) Persons may seek informal advice on all aspects of the Board's procedures by contacting the Board's Executive Director, Director of EEO Oversight, Solicitor, General Counsel or the Clerk of the Board.
( b ) Informal procedural advice will be supplied within the limits of available time and staff.
[58 FR 61992, Nov. 23, 1993, as amended at 68 FR 69298, Dec. 12, 2003]
### §657i. Coordination of disaster assistance programs with FEMA

#### (a) Coordination required

The Administrator shall ensure that the disaster assistance programs of the Administration are coordinated, to the maximum extent practicable, with the disaster assistance programs of the Federal Emergency Management Agency.

#### (b) Regulations required

The Administrator, in consultation with the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, shall establish regulations to ensure that each application for disaster assistance is submitted as quickly as practicable to the Administration or directed to the appropriate agency under the circumstances.

#### (c) Completion; revision

The initial regulations shall be completed not later than 270 days after the date of the enactment of the Small Business Disaster Response and Loan Improvements Act of 2008. Thereafter, the regulations shall be revised on an annual basis.

#### (d) Report

The Administrator shall include a report on the regulations whenever the Administration submits the report required by section 657o of this title.

(Pub. L. 85–536, §2[37], as added Pub. L. 110–234, title XII, §12062(2), May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1407, and Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title XII, §12062(2), June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 2169.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The date of the enactment of the Small Business Disaster Response and Loan Improvements Act of 2008, referred to in subsec. (c), is the date of enactment of subtitle B (§§12051–12091) of title XII of Pub. L. 110–246, which was approved June 18, 2008.

#### Codification

Pub. L. 110–234 and Pub. L. 110–246 enacted identical sections. Pub. L. 110–234 was repealed by section 4(a) of Pub. L. 110–246.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2[37] of Pub. L. 85–536 was renumbered section 2[49] and is set out as a note under section 631 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Enactment of this section and repeal of Pub. L. 110–234 by Pub. L. 110–246 effective May 22, 2008, the date of enactment of Pub. L. 110–234, see section 4 of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as a note under section 8701 of Title 7, Agriculture.
### steam

_ record - Re: FW: DMG Request for Extension of Time

Hi Thomas, This e-mail is sufficient to request an extension. Therefore, a paper copy of your letter requesting an extension it is not required. Thanks!
Sincerely, Jezebele Alicea-Virella

-----"Davis, Thomas L" <Thomas.L.Davis@dynegy.com> wrote: -----

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA From: "Davis, Thomas L" <T homas.L.Davis@dynegy.com> Date: 07/14/2010 01:59PM cc: "Diericx, Rick" <Ari c.Diericx@dynegy.com>, "Leskovsek, Andreas H" <Andreas.H.Leskovsek@dynegy.com> Subject: FW: DMG Request for Extension of Time

Ms. Alicea,

The attached letter was returned this morning to me by UPS. They said they could not deliver to the following address:

Jezebele Alicea

Mail Code: 4303T

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20460

What address should I use for UPS delivery?

Is a paper copy of our request even necessary , or was our July 7, 2010 e-mail attachment 

### From: <Alicea.Jezebele @ epamail.epa. g ov> To: "Davis, Thomas L" <Thomas.L.Davis@dynegy.com> Date: 7/15/2010 6:10 AM Sub j ect: Re: FW: DMG Request for Extension of Time Attachments: DMG Request for Extension of Time 7-6-2010.pdf Pa g e 1 of 2

8/24/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\TMedle y \Local Settin g s\Tem p \XP g r p wise\4C3EA66CD

...sufficient?

Thanks for your help.

Thomas L. Davis, P.E.
Manager; Environmental Projects
Operations Environmental Compliance
Dynegy Midwest Generation, Inc.

604 Pierce Blvd.
O'Fallon, IL 62269

Office No. 618-206-5931
Blackberry No. 618-407-8553

Fax No. 618-206-5891

9/80 Schedule "B"

From: Diericx, Rick Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2010 8:51 AM To: alicea.jezebele@epa.gov Cc: Davis, Thomas L; Trammell, Ben; dellin ger.robert@epa.gov; devlin.betsy@epa.gov Subject: DMG Request for Extension of Time

Attached is a copy of Dynegy Midwest Generation’s request for an extension of time to prepare and submit its responses to US EPA’s Steam Electric Power Generating Industry Effluent Limitations Guidelines Information Collection Request.
Please let me know if you have any questions.

Rick Diericx
Senior Director – Dynegy Midwest Generation, Inc.

618.206.5912 

### Pa g e 2 of 2

8/24/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\TMedle y \Local Settin g s\Tem p \XP g r p wise\4C3EA66CD

...
### §57a–1. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 96–252, §21(a)–(h), May 28, 1980, 94 Stat. 393; H. Res. 549, Mar. 25, 1980; Pub. L. 98–620, title IV, §402(13), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3358, provided procedures for review by Congress of final rules promulgated by the Federal Trade Commission.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date; Termination Date

Pub. L. 96–252, §21(i), May 28, 1980, 94 Stat. 396, provided that: "The provisions of this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act [May 28, 1980] and shall cease to have any force or effect after September 30, 1982."

Pub. L. 97–377, title I, §101(d), Dec. 21, 1982, 96 Stat. 1870, provided in part that notwithstanding any other provision of law, the provisions of section 21 of the Federal Trade Commission Improvements Act of 1980 [Pub. L. 96–252], which enacted this section and enacted provisions set out as a note under this section, were extended until Sept. 30, 1983, notwithstanding section 21(i) of such Act.
# C_2010288EN.01005201.xml

| 23.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/52

---

Action brought on 27 August 2010 — Adelholzener Alpenquellen v OHIM (Shape of a bottle with a relief-like depiction of three mountain summits)

(Case T-347/10)

()

(2010/C 288/96)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Adelholzener Alpenquellen GmbH (Siegsdorf, Germany) (represented by O. Rauscher, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 9 June 2010 in Case R 1516/2009-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 9 June 2010 in Case R 1516/2009-1;

| — | Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: the three-dimensional mark in the shape of a bottle with a relief-like depiction of three mountain summits for goods in Class 32

Decision of the Examiner: rejection of the application

Decision of the Board of Appeal: dismissal of the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (1) as the Community trade mark at issue has distinctive character; infringement of Article 37(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 as the Board of Appeal should not have based its decision on the absence of a disclaimer; and infringement of Article 75(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 as the applicant was unable to comment on certain depictions on which the decision was based

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

---
I

fM-l.OIO-O~o5

I

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this p~oposalbeen discussed?

Organization Person Date Response Contacted I

BA Padraci 1/5/10 e~ail

McCausland

RAA Dave Lotterer 1/5/10 Left message

I

TCCA Anthony Wan 1/4/10 email
§ 158.621 Adjusting salaries. ( a ) The Department adjusts a DHS-CS employee's salary, or the salaries of a group of DHS-CS employees, by paying a recognition adjustment under § 158.631, or paying a local cybersecurity talent market supplement under § 158.612, or both.
( b ) The Department does not provide DHS-CS employees with any automatic salary increase or any salary increase based on length of service in the DHS-CS or in any position outside the DHS-CS.
( c ) If the Department adjusts a salary structure under § 158.611(e) that results in an increase to the salary minimum for one or more subranges of the salary structure, for any DHS-CS employee receiving a salary in an affected subrange at the affected salary minimum, DHS adjusts the employee's salary to reflect the adjustment to the salary structure and the new salary minimum for the affected subrange. Such a salary adjustment is not considered a recognition adjustment under § 158.631.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Power3 Medical Products, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven B. Rash, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



November 14, 2007



| |     |                                     
| | --- | ------------------------------------
| | By: | /s/ STEVENB. RASH                   
| |     | Steven B. Rash                      
| |     | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
| |     | Power3 Medical Products, Inc.
# C_2006313EN.01002402.xml

| 20.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/24

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4437 — Sun Group/Autobar Packaging)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2006/C 313/10)

On 1 December 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4437. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4437. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://eur-lex.europa.eu)

---
roadTy peID rampFraction 2 0.08 4 0.08
AAM

- 1 3

- 298

- E May 01, 2013

Exemption No. 10257 A

Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2011

- 0419

Mr. Gordon Mills

Alpine Aviation

13310 Nevada City Avenue

Grass Valley, CA 95945

Dear Mr. Mills :

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No.

10257 . It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the conditions and

limitations.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated April 1 9 , 20 1 3 , you petitioned the Federal Aviation Adm inistration (FAA) on

behalf of Alpine Aviation for an exemption from part 120 Title 14, Code of Federal

Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would permit Alpine Aviation

, which is

operating under sep arate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety

- sensitive employees under

one testing program.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for gr anting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Alpine Aviation

.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10257

remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the

authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has

delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the following conditions and limitations.

Conditions and Limitations

1. E mployees of Alpine Aviation are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations a t all

times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of

the Alpine Aviation part 135 operation, not under the part 91.

This exemp tion terminates on May 31, 201 5 , un less sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

James R. Fraser, M.D.

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon
### §2057. Banned hazardous products

Whenever the Commission finds that—

(1) a consumer product is being, or will be, distributed in commerce and such consumer product presents an unreasonable risk of injury; and

(2) no feasible consumer product safety standard under this chapter would adequately protect the public from the unreasonable risk of injury associated with such product,

the Commission may, in accordance with section 2058 of this title, promulgate a rule declaring such product a banned hazardous product.

(Pub. L. 92–573, §8, Oct. 27, 1972, 86 Stat. 1215; Pub. L. 97–35, title XII, §1203(c), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 713.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1981—Pub. L. 97–35 substituted "may, in accordance with" for "may propose and, in accordance with".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1981 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 97–35 applicable with respect to regulations under this chapter and chapters 25 and 30 of this title for which notices of proposed rulemaking are issued after Aug. 14, 1981, see section 1215 of Pub. L. 97–35, set out as a note under section 2052 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the sixtieth day following Oct. 27, 1972, see section 34 of Pub. L. 92–573, set out as a note under section 2051 of this title.
# C_2011269EN.01003804.xml

| 10.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/38

---

Order of the President of the Court of 6 July 2011 — European Commission v Republic of Estonia

(Case C-16/11) (1)

1

2011/C 269/81

Language of the case: Estonian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 63, 26.2.2011.

1

---
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5076 

To authorize the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of the Senate to delegate 

authority to approve payroll and personnel actions. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 20, 2020 

Mr. BLUNT introduced the following bill; which was read twice, considered, 

read the third time, and passed 

A BILL 

To authorize the Sergeant at Arms and Doorkeeper of the 

Senate to delegate authority to approve payroll and personnel actions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO DELEGATE AUTHORITY TO AP4 PROVE PAYROLL AND PERSONNEL ACTIONS. 

5 Section 1201 of the Supplemental Appropriations 

6 Act, 1984 (2 U.S.C. 6598) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘all vouchers, for payment of 

8 moneys,’’ and inserting ‘‘any voucher for payment of 

9 moneys, payroll action, or personnel action’’; and 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 5076 CPS

1 (2) by striking ‘‘any voucher, for payment of 

2 moneys,’’ and inserting ‘‘any voucher for payment of 

3 moneys, payroll action, or personnel action’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 23



                  CONSENT OF INDEPEDENDENT ACCOUNTANTS




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement
of Homeland Holding Corporation on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-78693, 333-52267,
333-56387, and 333-61203) of our report dated February 29, 2000, except for
Note 14, as to which the date is March 9, 2000, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements of Homeland Holding Corporation and
subsidiaries as of January 1, 2000 and January 2, 1999 and for the 52 weeks
ended January 1, 2000, the 52 weeks ended January 2, 1999, and the 53 weeks
ended January 3, 1998, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form
10-K.




                                              PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP




March 29, 2000
§ 94.7 Disposal of animals, meats, and other articles ineligible for importation. ( a ) Ruminants and swine, and fresh (chilled or frozen) meats, prohibited importation under §§ 94.1, 94.8, 94.9, 94.10, 94.12, 94.14, or 94.18, which come into the United States by ocean vessel and are offered for entry and refused admission into this country, shall be destroyed or otherwise disposed of as the Administrator may direct, unless they are exported by the consignee within 48 hours, and meanwhile are retained under such isolation and other safeguards as the Administrator may require to prevent the introduction or dissemination of livestock diseases into the United States.
( b ) Ruminants and swine, and fresh (chilled or frozen) meats, prohibited importation under §§ 94.1, 94.8, 94.9, 94.10, 94.12, 94.14, or 94.18, which come into the United States aboard an airplane or railroad car and are offered for entry and refused admission into this country, shall be destroyed or otherwise disposed of as the Administrator may direct, unless they are exported by the consignee within 24 hours, and meanwhile are retained under such isolation and other safeguards as the Administrator may require to prevent the introduction or dissemination of livestock diseases into the United States.
( c ) Ruminants and swine, and fresh (chilled or frozen) meats, prohibited importation under §§ 94.1, 94.8, 94.9, 94.10, 94.12, 94.14, or 94.18, which come into the United States by any means other than ocean vessel, airplane, or railroad car and are offered for entry and refused admission into this country, shall be destroyed or otherwise disposed of as the Administrator may direct, unless they are exported by the consignee within 8 hours, and meanwhile are retained under such isolation and other safeguards as the Administrator may require to prevent the introduction or dissemination of livestock diseases into the United States.
( d ) Ruminants and swine, and fresh (chilled or frozen) meats, prohibited importation under §§ 94.1, 94.8, 94.9, 94.10, 94.12, 94.14, or 94.18, which come into the United States by any means but are not offered for entry into this country, and other animals, meats, and other articles prohibited importation under other sections of this part, which come into the United States by any means, whether they are offered for entry into this country or not, shall be immediately destroyed or otherwise disposed of as the Administrator may direct at any time.
[68 FR 6345, Feb. 7, 2003]
... 

'· 

Gulfstream 

A GENERAL DYNAMICS COMPANY 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations 

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE. 

Washington , DC 20590 

~ -;_ 

' r- 3 

November 16, 2015 

G-ODA-15-0954 

Subject: Exemption No. 13504, Emergency Exit Access, Proposed Application to Derivative 

Model Aircraft 

Reference: 1) Regulatory Docket Number FAA-2015-3595 

2) FAA Exemption No. 13504 

Dear Sirs: 

Gulfstream Aerospace was granted an exemption from 14 CFR 25.809(a) of Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations via reference 2). This exemption was granted for the Gulfstream Model GVII-G500. 

However, Gulfstream's original request was intended to be for the GVII-G500 and any future derivatives 

of the GVII-G500. Gulfstream requests this exemption be reconsidered for applicability to derivatives of 

the GVII-G500 and we request reference 2) be amended to include this allowance. 

If you have any questions or need additional information please contact Robert Glasscock at (912) 965-

6817 (via e-mail at robert.glasscock@gulfstream.com) or the undersigned. 

Respectfully, 

Robert Glasscock 

Director ODA Programs 

P.O. Box 2206, MIS R-02 

Savannah, GA 31402-2206 

robert.glasscock@gulfstream.com 

(912) 965-6817 

Cc: N. Berryman, ACE-120A (via email) 

B. Whitton, Gulfstream ODA (via email) 

C. Underwood, ACE-120A (via email) 

M. Gordon, ANM-113 (via email) 

J. Nyberg, EASA (via email) 

P.O. Box 2206 • Savannah, GA 31402-2206 USA • Telephone (912) 965-3000 • gulfstream.com
# C_2012184EN.01001905.xml

| 23.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 184/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 184/19

---

Order of the General Court of 3 May 2012 — Consorzio del vino nobile di Montepulciano and Others v Commission

(Case T-318/10) (1)

1

2012/C 184/38

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 260, 25.9.2010.

1

---