alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                   JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                     MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                     0
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        560,922
<ALLOWANCES>                                          27,000
<INVENTORY>                                          464,438
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   1,100,645
<PP&E>                                               203,857
<DEPRECIATION>                                       112,072
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     2,148,806
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              1,915,711
<BONDS>                                            1,316,287
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                               1,512
<OTHER-SE>                                       (1,084,704)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       2,148,806
<SALES>                                            1,303,864
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   1,303,864
<CGS>                                                754,808
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        754,808
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    80,532
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (462,360)
<INCOME-TAX>                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (462,360)
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (462,360)
<EPS-BASIC>                                            (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (.03)



</TABLE>
### §6411. Reports

Within 2 years after October 11, 1996, and at least once every 2 years thereafter, the Secretary of Commerce shall prepare and submit to the Congress and the Secretary a report examining whether operation of the Council, in conjunction with the cumulative effects of market changes and Federal programs, has had an effect on propane consumers, including residential, agriculture, process, and nonfuel users of propane. The Secretary of Commerce shall consider and, to the extent practicable, shall include in the report submissions by propane consumers, and shall consider whether there have been long-term and short-term effects on propane prices as a result of Council activities and Federal programs, and whether there have been changes in the proportion of propane demand attributable to various market segments. To the extent that the report demonstrates that there has been an adverse effect, the Secretary of Commerce shall include recommendations for correcting the situation. Upon petition by affected parties or upon request by the Secretary of Energy, the Secretary of Commerce may prepare and submit the report required by this section at less than 2-year intervals.

(Pub. L. 104–284, §12, Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3375.)
# C_2010328EN.01005401.xml

| 4.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/54

---

Action brought on 7 October 2010 — Persia International Bank v Council

(Case T-493/10)

()

2010/C 328/83

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Persia International Bank plc (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Gadhia, S. Ashley, Solicitors, D. Anderson, QC and R. Blakeley, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | annul paragraph 2 of Table B of the Annex to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2010 (1) in so far as it relates to the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul paragraph 2 of Table B of the Annex to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2010 (1) in so far as it relates to the applicant;

1

| — | annul paragraph 4 of Table B of Annex II to Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP (2) in so far as it relates to the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul paragraph 4 of Table B of Annex II to Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP (2) in so far as it relates to the applicant;

2

| — | declare Article 7(2)(d) of Council Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 (3) inapplicable to the applicant; and |
| --- | --- |

—

declare Article 7(2)(d) of Council Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 (3) inapplicable to the applicant; and

3

| — | order the Council to pay the costs of the application. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council to pay the costs of the application.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In the present case the applicant seeks the partial annulment of Council Implementing Regulation No 668/2010 and of Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP in so far as the applicant is included on the list of natural and legal persons, entities and bodies whose funds and economic resources are frozen in accordance with this provision. Furthermore, the applicant applies, in accordance with Article 277 TFUE, for the inapplicability of Article 7(2)(d) of Council Regulation (EC) No 423/2007.

The pleas in law and main arguments relied on by the applicant are identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-492/10 Melli Bank v Council.

Melli Bank

Council

---

(1)  Council implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2010 of 26 July 2010 implementing Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 concerning restrictive measures against Iran, OJ 2010 L 195, p. 25

1

(2)  Council Decision of 26 July 2010 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Common Position 2007/140/CFSP, OJ 2010 L 195, p. 39

2

(3)  Council Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 of 19 April 2007 concerning restrictive measures against Iran, OJ 2007 L 103, p. 1

3

---
### §5407. Manufacturers' insignias

#### (a) General rule

Unless the specifications provide otherwise, fasteners that are required by the applicable consensus standard or standards to bear an insignia identifying their manufacturer shall not be offered for sale or sold in commerce unless—

(1) the fasteners bear such insignia; and

(2) the manufacturer has complied with the insignia recordation requirements established under subsection (b).

#### (b) Recordation

The Secretary shall establish, by regulation, a program to provide for the recordation of the insignias of manufacturers described in subsection (a).

(Pub. L. 101–592, §5, formerly §8, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 2950; renumbered §5 and amended Pub. L. 106–34, §5, June 8, 1999, 113 Stat. 122.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 5 of Pub. L. 101–592 was classified to section 5404 of this title, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 106–34.

#### Amendments

1999—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 106–34, §5(1), reenacted subsec. heading without change and amended text generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "No fastener which is required by the standards and specifications to which it was manufactured to bear a raised or depressed insignia identifying its manufacturer or private label distributor shall be offered for sale or sold in commerce unless the manufacturer or private label distributor of such fastener has complied with the requirements prescribed by the Secretary in connection with the program established under subsection (b) of this section."

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 106–34, §5(2), substituted "described in subsection (a)" for "and private label distributors described in subsection (a), to ensure the traceability of a fastener to its manufacturer or private label distributor".
§ 78.10 Official vaccination of cattle moving into and out of Class B and Class C States or areas. ( a ) Female dairy cattle born after January 1, 1984, which are 4 months of age or over must be official vaccinates to move interstate into or out of a Class B State or area[4] unless they are moved interstate directly to a recognized slaughtering establishment or quarantined feedlot, or directly to an approved intermediate handling facility and then directly to a recognized slaughtering establishment, or directly to an approved intermediate handling facility and then directly to a quarantined feedlot and then directly to a recognized slaughtering establishment, or directly to an approved intermediate handling facility and then directly to a quarantined feedlot and then directly to a recognized slaughtering establishment. Female cattle eligible for official calfhood vaccination and required by this paragraph to be officially vaccinated may be moved interstate from a farm of origin directly to a specifically approved stockyard and be officially vaccinated upon arrival at the specifically approved stockyard.
( b ) Female cattle born after January 1, 1984, which are 4 months of age or over must be official vaccinates to move into a Class C State or area4 unless they are moved interstate directly to a recognized slaughtering establishment, or directly to an approved intermediate handling facility and then directly to a recognized slaughtering establishment, or directly to an approved intermediate handling facility and then directly to a quarantined feedlot and then directly to a recognized slaughtering establishment. Female cattle eligible for official calfhood vaccination and required by this paragraph to be officially vaccinated may be moved interstate from a farm of origin directly to a specifically approved stockyard and be officially vaccinated upon arrival at the specifically approved stockyard.
( c ) Female cattle born after January 1, 1984, which are 4 months of age or over must be official vaccinates to move interstate out of a Class C State or area4 inder § 78.9(d)(3) of this part. Female cattle from a certified brucellosis-free herd that are eligible for official calfhood vaccination and required by this paragraph to be officially vaccinated may be moved interstate from a farm of origin directly to a specifically approved stockyard and be officially vaccinated upon arrival at the specifically approved stockyard.
[51 FR 32580, Sept. 12, 1986, as amended at 54 FR 1926, Jan. 18, 1989; 56 FR 58638, Nov. 21, 1991] Footnotes -
78.10
[4] Female cattle imported into the United States may be exempted from the vaccination requirements of this paragraph with the concurrence of the State animal health official of the State of destination. This concurrence is required prior to the importation of the cattle into the United States.
# C_2011030EN.01006302.xml

| 29.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/63 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/63

---

Action brought on 5 October 2010 — Andrecs and Others v Commission

(Case F-96/10)

()

2011/C 30/123

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Stefan Robert Andrecs (Brussels, Belgium) and Others (represented by: L. Vogel, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the Commission’s decision adjusting the applicants’ remuneration, pensions and other allowances with effect from 1 July 2009, as set out in their salary slips, within the framework of the annual adjustment of the remuneration and pensions of officials and other servants pursuant to Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1296/2009 of 23 December 2009.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision by which the appointing authority fixed the new amount of the applicants’ remuneration, pensions and other allowances under the Staff Regulations, as set out in particular in the applicants’ salary slips R6/2009 and 01/2010, and annul the decision by which, on 24 June 2010, the appointing authority rejected the applicants’ complaint of 29 March 2010 in so far as those decisions deny the applicants an increase in their remuneration, pensions and allowances under the Staff Regulations equivalent to 3.70 % of the original amount, and dismiss their application for interest to be awarded to them on the amounts still owed to them at the rate laid down by the European Central Bank for its main refinancing operations, increased by two percentage points, from the date on which the applicants became entitled to the sums at issue until full payment; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision by which the appointing authority fixed the new amount of the applicants’ remuneration, pensions and other allowances under the Staff Regulations, as set out in particular in the applicants’ salary slips R6/2009 and 01/2010, and annul the decision by which, on 24 June 2010, the appointing authority rejected the applicants’ complaint of 29 March 2010 in so far as those decisions deny the applicants an increase in their remuneration, pensions and allowances under the Staff Regulations equivalent to 3.70 % of the original amount, and dismiss their application for interest to be awarded to them on the amounts still owed to them at the rate laid down by the European Central Bank for its main refinancing operations, increased by two percentage points, from the date on which the applicants became entitled to the sums at issue until full payment;

| — | Order the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the European Commission to pay the costs.

---
### §2624. Repealed. Pub. L. 114–182, title I, §16, June 22, 2016, 130 Stat. 499

Section, Pub. L. 94–469, title I, §25, Oct. 11, 1976, 90 Stat. 2046; Pub. L. 96–88, title V, §509(b), Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 695; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 99–519, §3(c)(1), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2989, required a study on indemnification for actions taken by the Administrator under Federal law.
---

Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Hersha Hospitality Trust (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jay H. Shah, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








November 5, 2010
/s/ Jay H. ShahJay H. ShahChief Executive Officer
#### § 72.10 Inspected or dipped and certified cattle subject to restrictions of State of destination.

All such interstate movements of inspected or dipped and certified cattle are subject to such restrictions, which are not inconsistent with the regulations in this subchapter, as may be imposed at destination by the officials of the State, Territory, or the District of Columbia.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Antony Koblish, President and Chief Executive Officer and Joseph M. Paiva, Chief Financial Officer of Orthovita, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to my knowledge:



|1. | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|ANTONY KOBLISH                       
|Antony Koblish                       
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|March 5, 2004                        



|                       
|-----------------------
|JOSEPH M. PAIVA        
|Joseph M. Paiva        
|Chief Financial Officer
|March 5, 2004
### §4112. Annual agency budget and spending report

#### (1) Annual agency budgets

Each agency represented on the Interagency Arctic Research Policy Committee shall each include in their agency's annual budget request to Congress a description of their agency's projected Arctic research activities and associated budget for the fiscal year covered by the budget request.

#### (2) Report to Congress

Beginning with fiscal year 2025 and annually thereafter until fiscal year 2034, not later than 60 days after the President's budget request for such fiscal year is submitted to Congress, the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall submit an annual report to Congress summarizing each agency's budget request related to Arctic research activities per the information submitted in accordance with paragraph (1).

(Pub. L. 117–263, div. E, title LIX, §5912(b), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3442.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023, and not as part of the Arctic Research and Policy Act of 1984 which comprises this chapter.
#     Any SUD

### Categories Related to Any SUD

                      - Alcohol
                      - Alcohol Use Disorder
                      - Illegal Drugs
                      - Marijuana
                      - Adolescents as Population Group
                      - Tobacco
                      - Cocaine
                      - People with Substance Use or Abuse Problems as Population Group
                      - Pain Relievers
                      - Young Adults as Population Group
                      - Mature Adults as Population Group
                      - Older Adults as Population Group
                      - People with Mental Health Problems as Population Group
                      - People with Alcohol Use or Abuse Problems as Population Group
                      - Heroin

Latest In Any SUD

2019 NSDUH Detailed Tables

Data Table : National Survey on Drug Use and Health - September 11, 2020

2018 NSDUH Detailed Tables

Data Table : National Survey on Drug Use and Health - August 20, 2019

Changes in integrated HIV care in substance use treatment facilities (2015 -2020)

Spotlight : National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services - May 2, 2022

Geographic distribution of integrated HIV care in substance use treatment facilities

Spotlight : National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services - May 2, 2022

P-value Tables

Data Table : National Survey on Drug Use and Health - January 28, 2021

View All
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the report of Prospect MedicalHoldings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005(the “Report”), I, Mike Heather, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
| May  16, 2005 | /s/ MIKE HEATHER             |
|---------------|------------------------------|
| ** **    | **Mike Heather**             |
|          | **Chief  Financial Officer** |

 

----
### §47. Reference of suits under antitrust statutes to Commission

In any suit in equity brought by or under the direction of the Attorney General as provided in the antitrust Acts, the court may, upon the conclusion of the testimony therein, if it shall be then of opinion that the complainant is entitled to relief, refer said suit to the Commission, as a master in chancery, to ascertain and report an appropriate form of decree therein. The Commission shall proceed upon such notice to the parties and under such rules of procedure as the court may prescribe, and upon the coming in of such report such exceptions may be filed and such proceedings had in relation thereto as upon the report of a master in other equity causes, but the court may adopt or reject such report, in whole or in part, and enter such decree as the nature of the case may in its judgment require.

(Sept. 26, 1914, ch. 311, §7, 38 Stat. 722.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The words "In any suit in equity brought by or under the direction of the Attorney General as provided in the antitrust Acts" have reference to actions under sections 4, 9, and 25 of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of Federal Trade Commission, with certain exceptions, to Chairman of such Commission, see Reorg. Plan No. 8 of 1950, §1, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3175, 64 Stat. 1264, set out under section 41 of this title.
#### § 11.4 Authority to represent in other cases.

When an attorney acting in a representative capacity appears in person or signs a document submitted to the Government Accountability Office in connection with a matter other than one involving a payment to be made by the United States, his personal appearance or signature shall constitute a representation that he is authorized and qualified to represent the particular party in whose behalf he acts. In the case of representatives other than attorneys, a simple written declaration from the principal will be accepted as evidence of the authority of the representative to act on behalf of the principal.
MEMORANDUM

DATE: January 7, 2015

TO: Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket id: OAR-2013-0602

FROM: Region 5, EPA

SUBJECT: Regional Administrator Susan Hedman’s Speaking Engagements on the Topic of 

Clean Power Plan

SUMMARY

The following is a list of Regional Administrator Susan Hedman’s speaking engagements 

on the topic of Clean Power Plan. 

Date Audience # of Attendees

6/10/2014 Gas power Chicago conference 150

6/17/2014 Power experts Conference 150

9/9/2014 Women in Energy 100

9/17/2014 BlueGreen Alliance 50

9/18/2014 Illinois Chamber of Commerce 50

9/23/2014 Rotary Club of Chicago 50

9/26/2014 University of MN 30

9/29/2014 University of MI 30

10/1/2014 University of Chicago 30

10/3/2014 Wisconsin Business Alliance 50

10/3/2014 University of Wisconsin 30

10/10/2014 Ohio State University 30

10/16/2014 Calumet Area Industrial Commission 50

10/30/2014 Federation of Environmental Technologists 300
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Check ListsComputer Uses in EducationEducational ResourcesElementary Secondary EducationEvaluation CriteriaEvaluation MethodsInformation LiteracyInformation SourcesInstructional Material EvaluationInstructional MaterialsLearning ActivitiesMedia SelectionQuality ControlResource MaterialsWorld Wide Web

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget