alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 284

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 284 appear at 65 FR 10222, Feb. 25, 2000.

#### § 284.303 OCS blanket certificates.

Every OCS pipeline [as that term is defined in § 284.302(b)] is required to provide open-access, nondiscriminatory transportation service pursuant to a blanket transportation certificate issued under subpart G of this part.

[Order 559, 58 FR 52663, Oct. 12, 1993]
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-13-00764-CR

Dorothy MARTINEZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR2599

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE BARNARD, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

REVERSED and this case is REMANDED to the trial court for a new trial.

SIGNED November 12, 2014.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
§ 154.203 Compliance filings. ( a ) In addition to the requirements of subparts A, B, and C of this part, filings made to comply with orders issued by the Commission, including those issued under delegated authority, must contain the following: ( 1 ) A list of the directives with which the company is complying;
( 2 ) Revised workpapers, data, or summaries with cross-references to the originally filed workpapers, data, or summaries;
( b ) Filings made to comply with Commission orders must include only those changes required to comply with the order. Such compliance filings may not be combined with other rate or tariff change filings. A compliance filing that includes other changes or that does not comply with the applicable order in every respect may be rejected.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

January 30, 2020

No. 04

- 19

- 00898

- CR

Adrian Justino. SOTO

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Tex as

Trial Court No. 2018CR4647

The Honorable Jennifer Pena, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Michael D. Robbins ’ Motion to W i thdraw as Appellant ’ s Counsel is hereby GRANTED.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 30th day of January, 2020

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Cle rk of Court
Augus t 13,20) 0 

### TRANSPORTATIO N "•"Kn T OPERATION S 

### m

## Of! " ^ ! 

### A 0 : 2 5

Ms . Susa n Kurlan d Assistan t Secretary for

Aviatio n & Internationa l Affairs , X- 1 U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 1200 Ne w Jerse y Ave , S E W88-32 4 Washington , D C 2059 0 Subject : Smal l Communit y Ai r Servic e Developmen t

Gran t Applicatio n Docke t OST-2010-012 4 Columbi aMetropolita n Airpor t - Colombia , S C Dea r Ms . Kurland : A s th e Mayo r

o f Irmo , SC , I strongl y support th e ai r servic e proposa l detaile di n th e Smal l Community Ai r

Servic e Developmen t

Programgran t

application. Commercia l ai r servic e a t Columbi aMetropolita n Airport i s vita l t o economi c developmen t i n th e midland s o f

Sout h Carolina
. Ai r

trave l play s a

n importan t

rol e i n support

o f tourism , education , governmen t

an dbusiness
. Thi s progra mshoul dals o hel p support th e many program s a

t Fort Jackson , whic h i s th e major basi c trainin g facility for th e U S Army , a s wel l a s man y othe r

programs . Future community growth o f th e Columbi acommunity depends , i n part , o n th e airport' s ability to mee t

th e need s o f

existin g local businesse s a s wel l a s companie s considerin g Columbi aa s alocatio n fo r thei r operations
. Th e proposa l t o suppor t improve dai r

servic e wil l greatl y improv e ou r

ability t o remai n competitiv e i n th e globa l marketplace , whic h i s th e basi s fo

r supportin g th e local p:conom y an dattractin g ne w businesse s an dresident s t o th e area . Th e Columbi aMetropolita n Airport ha s forge dstron g tie s with th e busines s community t o retai n an dimprov e loca l ai r service
. W e appreciat e th e opportunit y t o expan dthat partnershi p t o includ e th e U.S
. Departoien t o f Transportatio n throug h th e Smal l Communit

y Ai r Servic e Developmen t

Program .

John Gibbons , Mayo r Tow n o f Lexingto n P.O
. Bo x 40 6 • 730 0 Woodro w Stree t • Irmo , S.C
. 29063*040 6 • (803 ) 781-705 0 * Fax : (803 ) 749-274 3
### §6711. Functional regulation of insurance

The insurance activities of any person (including a national bank exercising its power to act as agent under section 92 of title 12) shall be functionally regulated by the States, subject to section 6701 of this title.

(Pub. L. 106–102, title III, §301, Nov. 12, 1999, 113 Stat. 1407.)
Editorial Note on Part 12
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 12 appear at 69 FR 32438, June 10, 2004.

§ 12.38 Report on a comprehensive assessment. ( a ) *Scope.* The comprehensive assessment report must include documentation of all the items listed in § 12.37.
( b ) *Specific evaluation.* In addition to the items listed in § 12.36(b)(1) through § 12.36(b)(5), the comprehensive assessment report must evaluate: ( 1 ) The adequacy of spillways, including the effects of overtopping of nonoverflow structures, as described in § 12.39;
( 2 ) The structural adequacy and stability of structures under all credible loading conditions;
( 3 ) The potential for internal erosion and/or piping of embankments, foundations, and abutments;
( 4 ) The design and construction practices used during original construction and subsequent modifications, in comparison with the industry best practices in use at the time of the inspection under this subpart D;
( 5 ) The adequacy of the Supporting Technical Information Document and the attached electronic records; and
( 6 ) The adequacy and findings of the potential failure mode analysis and risk analysis report(s).
( c ) *Analyses of record.* The comprehensive assessment report must include the independent consultant team's evaluation of the assumptions, methods, calculations, results, and conclusions of the items listed in § 12.37(a)(2)(i) through (iv). The evaluation must: ( 1 ) Address the accuracy, relevance, and consistency with the current state of the practice of dam engineering;
( 2 ) Be accompanied by sufficient documentation of the independent consultant team's rationale, including, as needed, new calculations by the independent consultant team to verify that the assumptions, methods, calculations, results, and conclusions in the analyses of record are correct; and
( 3 ) If the independent consultant team is unable to review the analyses of record for any of the items listed in § 12.37(a)(2)(i) through (iv); or if the independent consultant team disagrees with the assumptions, methods, calculations, results, or conclusions therein; the independent consultant(s) must recommend that the licensee complete new analyses to address the identified concerns.
( d ) *Changes since the previous inspection.* The requirements of this section are the same as described in § 12.36(c).
( e ) *Recommendations.* The requirements of this section are the same as described in § 12.36(d).
( f ) *Dissenting views.* The requirements of this section are the same as described in § 12.36(e).
( g ) *List of participants.* The requirements of this section are the same as described in § 12.36(f).
( h ) *Statement of independence.* The requirements of this section are the same as described in § 12.36(g).
( i ) *Signature.* The requirements of this section are the same as described in § 12.36(h).
EX-10.48



 Exhibit 10.48 
  





 
 Call Marketplace Insertion Order 

 

			
	Advertiser/Agency Information
		
	Advertiser/Agency Name:	  	Resolution Media
		
	Address:	  	225 N Michigan Ave, Suite 820, Chicago, IL 60601
		
	Contact Name/Phone Number:	  	***
		
	Contact Email:	  	***
		
	Campaign Name:	  	State Farm – Life

  

					
	Campaign Summary
		
	Advertising Description:	  	Call Marketplace campaign
		
	Ad Type:	  	Voice, Voice Cat
	  
 Start/End Dates:
	  	  
 Start Date: January 1, 2016 End Date:
December 31, 2016

			
	Volume:	  	Estimated Call Volume	  	Total Budget
		  	  
 ***
	  	  
 ***

			
	Pricing:	  	***	  	
			
	Additional Terms:	  	 •       ***

 

•       ***

 

•       ***

 

•       ***
	  	
	  
 Payment Terms

 

	Method/Plan:	  	 ̈  Credit
Card        x  Invoice         ̈  Pre-pay

 Agreement 

This Advertiser/Agency Insertion Order (“IO”), together with the Terms and Conditions For Pay-For-Call Advertising For Resolution Media Clients
dated September 7, 2010 entered into by and between Agency and Company (the “Terms”), which are incorporated herein by reference, constitute a separate and legally binding and enforceable Advertising Services agreement
(“Agreement”) between Marchex Sales, LLC, (f/k/a Marchex Sales, Inc.) a wholly-owned subsidiary of Marchex, Inc. with its principal place of business at 6700 Via Austi Parkway, Suite D, Las Vegas NV 89119 (“Company”) and the
Advertiser or Agency set forth above. This Agreement supplements and does not replace any other existing advertiser campaign between the parties. By executing this Agreement, Advertiser or Agency affirms that it fully understands and accepts all
applicable terms, policies and conditions of this Agreement and enters into this Agreement with Company. 
 Agreed and accepted on 12/24/2015 

 

									
	Authorized Representative for Marchex Sales, LLC:	 		 	Authorized Representative for Advertiser/Agency:
					
	By (Signature):	 	 /s/ Brendhan Hight
	 		 	By: (Signature):	 	 /s/ Kate Edelson

					
	Name:	 	 Brendhan Hight
	 		 	Name:	 	 Kate Edelson

					
	Title:	 	 Director
	 		 	Title:	 	 Associate BPM


 [***] Certain information in this agreement has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Wilson, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 346]

Application by the *507appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated August 5, 2002 *(People v Wilson,*297 AD2d 298 [2002]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered May 6, 1997.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, EJ., Florio, Miller and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
### §281a. Structural failures

The National Institute of Standards and Technology, on its own initiative but only after consultation with local authorities, may initiate and conduct investigations to determine the causes of structural failures in structures which are used or occupied by the general public. No part of any report resulting from such investigation, or from an investigation under the National Construction Safety Team Act [15 U.S.C. 7301 et seq.], shall be admitted as evidence or used in any suit or action for damages arising out of any matter mentioned in such report.

(Pub. L. 99–73, §7, July 29, 1985, 99 Stat. 173; Pub. L. 100–418, title V, §5115(c), Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1433; Pub. L. 107–231, §13, Oct. 1, 2002, 116 Stat. 1476.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The National Construction Safety Team Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 107–231, Oct. 1, 2002, 116 Stat. 1471, which is classified generally to chapter 99 [§7301 et seq.] of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 7301 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Act which comprises this chapter.

#### Amendments

2002—Pub. L. 107–231 inserted ", or from an investigation under the National Construction Safety Team Act," after "from such investigation".

1988—Pub. L. 100–418 substituted "National Institute of Standards and Technology" for "National Bureau of Standards".
```

                                                                Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1250,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Power3 Medical Products, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven
B. Rash, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully compiles with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                              /s/ Steven B. Rash
May 23, 2005                            Steven B. Rash
                                        Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                                        Power3 Medical Products, Inc.
```
### §714j. Utilization of associations and trade facilities

The Corporation may, in the conduct of its business, utilize on a contract or fee basis, committees or associations of producers, producer-owned and producer-controlled cooperative associations, and trade facilities.

(June 29, 1948, ch. 704, §12, 62 Stat. 1073.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Exceptions From Transfer of Functions

For exception of functions of corporations of Department of Agriculture from transfer of functions to Secretary of Agriculture by Reorg. Plan No. 2 of 1953, see Exceptions From Transfer of Functions note set out under section 712a of this title.
# C_2012165EN.01001801.xml

| 9.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/18

---

Judgment of the General Court of 24 April 2012 — Samskip Multimodal Container Logistics v Commission

(Case T-166/10) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Decision awarding Community financial assistance to improve the environmental performance of the freight transport system - Marco Polo II programme - Termination of the grant agreement and definitive abandonment of the project - No longer any interest in bringing proceedings - No need to adjudicate)

2012/C 165/30

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Samskip Multimodal Container Logistics BV (’s-Gravenzande, Netherlands) (represented by: K. Platteau, Y. Maasdam and P. Broers, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Simonsson, Agent, assisted by J. Grayston and P. Gjørtler, lawyers)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

APPLICATION for annulment of Commission Decision C(2010) 580 of 27 January 2010 on the financial assistance for proposals for actions submitted in the 2009 selection procedure in the European Union programme ‘improving the environmental performance of the freight transport system’ (the Marco Polo II programme), in so far as it selects Proposal TREN/B4/SUB/01-2009 MP-II/6 concerning the G2G@2XL project for funding in the amount of EUR 2 190 539.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that there is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that there is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to bear four fifths of the costs of Samskip Multimodal Container Logistics BV and four fifths of its own costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to bear four fifths of the costs of Samskip Multimodal Container Logistics BV and four fifths of its own costs;

| 3. | Orders Samskip Multimodal Container Logistics to bear one fifth of the Commission’s costs and one fifth of its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Samskip Multimodal Container Logistics to bear one fifth of the Commission’s costs and one fifth of its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 209, 31.7.2010.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 49 (Monday, March 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 13621]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5755]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel; Teleconference

    Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Pilot for State-specific Cross-Sectional 
Surveillance of Persons with Rare Disorders and Longitudinal Assessment 
of Outcomes, Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) DD11-004, and Pilot 
Longitudinal Data Collection to Inform Public Health--Fragile X 
Syndrome, FOA DD11-007, initial review.
    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting:
    Time and Date: 11 a.m.-5 p.m., April 21, 2011 (Closed).
    Place: Teleconference.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with 
provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., and 
the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services 
Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters to Be Discussed: The meeting will include the initial 
review, discussion, and evaluation of ``Pilot for State-specific Cross-
Sectional Surveillance of Persons with Rare Disorders and Longitudinal 
Assessment of Outcomes, FOA DD11-004, and Pilot Longitudinal Data 
Collection to Inform Public Health--Fragile X Syndrome, FOA DD11-007.''
    Contact Person for More Information: Donald Blackman, PhD, 
Scientific Review Officer, Extramural Research Program Office, National 
Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, 4770 
Buford Highway, NE., Mailstop K-92, Atlanta, Georgia 30341, Telephone: 
(770) 488-3023, E-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c0848299f780a3a4a3eea7afb6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b9fdfbe08ef9daddda97ded6cf">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency 
for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: March 7, 2011.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2011-5755 Filed 3-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2013225EN.01000902.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 27 June 2013 — European Commission v French Republic

(Case C-485/11) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Electronic communications networks and services - Directive 2002/20/EC - Article 12 - Administrative charges applicable to undertakings holding general authorisations - National legislation - Electronic telecommunications operators - Requirement to pay an additional charge)

2013/C 225/14

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: A. Bordes and G. Braun, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of France (represented by: G. de Bergues and J.-S. Pilczer, Agents)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: N. Díaz Abad, Agent), Hungary (represented by: M.Z. Fehér, K. Szíjjártó, K. Molnár and A. Szilágyi, Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Article 12 of Directive 2002/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services (OJ 2002 L 108, p. 21) — Charges applicable to undertakings holding general authorisations — Compatibility of national legislation introducing an additional charge on electronic telecommunications operators

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain and Hungary to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain and Hungary to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 355, 3.12.2011.

1

---