alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries of the Registrant

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

       SUBSIDIARY                     STATE OF ORGANIZATION     OTHER TRADE NAME
       ----------                     ---------------------     ----------------
<S>                                   <C>                       <C>
AFC FITTINGS, INC.                           DELAWARE                 NONE
AFC INVESTMENTS, INC.                      MASSACHUSETTS              NONE
KAF-TECH, INC.                               DELAWARE                 NONE
TKN, INC.                                  RHODE ISLAND               NONE
WPFY, INC.                                   DELAWARE                 NONE
AREA LIGHTING RESEARCH, INC.                 DELAWARE                 NONE
B&B ELECTRONICS                              ILLINOIS                 NONE
  MANUFACTURING COMPANY                   
MADISON EQUIPMENT                            DELAWARE                 NONE
  COMPANY, INC.                           
FEDERAL HOSE                                 DELAWARE                 NONE
  MANUFACTURING, INC                      
AFC REALTY HOLDING CORP.                     DELAWARE                 NONE
SPIRADUCT, INC.                            PENNSYLVANIA               NONE
GEORGIA PIPE COMPANY                          GEORGIA                 NONE
</TABLE>
§ 270.201 Applicability. ( a ) This part applies to determinations of jurisdictional agencies for tight formation gas, occluded natural gas produced from coal seams, and natural gas produced from Devonian shale that is produced through: ( 1 ) A well the surface drilling of which began after December 31, 1979, but before January 1, 1993;
( 2 ) A recompletion commenced after January 1, 1993, in a well the surface drilling of which began after December 31, 1979, but before January 1, 1993; or
( 3 ) A recompletion commenced after December 31, 1979, but before January 1, 1993, where such gas could not have been produced from any completion location in existence in the well bore before January 1, 1980.
( b ) This part also applies to determinations of jurisdictional agencies that designate a formation, or portion thereof, as a tight formation.
§ 590.200 Records and related requirements. ( a ) Persons engaged in the transporting, shipping, or receiving of any eggs or egg products in commerce, or holding such articles so received, and all egg handlers, except producer-packers with an annual egg production from a flock of 3,000 layers or fewer, must maintain records documenting, for a period of 2 years, the following, to the extent applicable: ( 1 ) The date of lay, date and time of refrigeration, date of receipt, quantity and quality of eggs purchased or received, and from whom (including a complete address, unless a master list is maintained). Process records documenting that the temperature and labeling requirements in § 590.50(a) have been met must also be kept;
( 2 ) The date of packaging, ambient air temperature surrounding product stored after processing, quantity and quality of eggs delivered or sold, and to whom (including a complete address, unless a master list is maintained);
( 3 ) If a consecutive lot numbering system is not employed to identify individual eggs, containers of eggs, or egg products, record the alternative code system used, in accordance with § 590.411(c)(3);
( 4 ) The date of disposal and quantity of restricted eggs, including inedible egg product or incubator reject product, sold or given away for animal food or other uses or otherwise disposed of, and to whom (including a complete address, unless a master list is maintained);
( 5 ) The individual or composite (running tally) record of restricted egg sales to household consumers. Records should show number of dozens sold on a daily basis. The name and address of the consumer is not required;
( 6 ) The date of production and quantity of egg products delivered or sold, and to whom (including a complete address, unless a master list is maintained);
( 7 ) The date of receipt and quantity of egg products purchased or received, and from whom (including a complete address, unless a master list is maintained);
( 8 ) The production records by categories of eggs such as graded eggs, nest-run eggs, dirties, checks, etc.; bills of sale, inventories, receipts, shipments, shippers, receivers, dates of shipment and receipt, carrier names, etc.
( b ) All records required to be maintained by this section must be made available to an authorized representative of the Secretary for official review and copying.
( c ) Records of all labeling, along with the product formulation and processing procedures as prescribed in §§ 590.410 through 590.412, must be kept by every person processing, except processors exempted under § 590.100.
[85 FR 68675, Oct. 29, 2020]
Editorial Note on Part 28
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear at 76 FR 76873, Dec. 9, 2011.

§ 28.132 Disciplinary proceedings. ( a ) If the General Counsel determines after any investigation under 31 U.S.C. 752(b) that disciplinary action should be initiated against an employee, the General Counsel shall prepare a written complaint against the employee containing their determination, together with a statement of the supporting facts, and present the complaint and the statement to the employee and the Board in accordance with paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section.
( b ) In the case of an employee in a confidential, policy making, policy-determining, or policy-advocating position appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, the complaint and statement referred to in paragraph (a) of this section, with any response by the employee, shall be presented to the Congress for appropriate action in lieu of being presented under paragraph (d) of this section.
( c ) Any employee against whom a complaint has been presented to the Board under paragraph (a) of this section is entitled to: ( 1 ) A reasonable time to answer orally and in writing and to furnish affidavits and other documentary evidence in support of the answer;
( 2 ) Be represented by an attorney or other representative;
( 3 ) A hearing before the Board or a member designated by the Board;
( 4 ) Have a transcript kept of any hearing under paragraph (c)(3) of this section; and
( 5 ) A written decision and reasons therefor at the earliest practicable date, including a copy of a final decision ordering disciplinary action.
( d ) A final order of the Board may order disciplinary action consisting of removal, reduction in grade, debarment from GAO employment for a period not to exceed 5 years, suspension, reprimand, or an assessment of civil penalty not to exceed $1,000.
( e ) An employee subject to a final decision ordering disciplinary action under this section may obtain judicial review of the order in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in accordance with 31 U.S.C. 755.
[58 FR 61992, Nov. 23, 1993, as amended at 68 FR 69304, Dec. 12, 2003; 89 FR 51399, June 18, 2024]
P.1 

OAR Box 1500 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

57) ll-C-83 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 8/5/2008 1:51:29 PM Sheet 57 of 343 
P.2 

Date sent: 

From: 

Subject: 

To: 

Copies to: 

A 945 7 

Mon, 01 Dec 1997 07:22:26 -0500 

MADELEINE STRUM <STRUM.MADELEINE@epamail.epa.gov> 

summary of September 18.1997 MACT meeting 

blacovara@aol.com, robhab@erols.com, stevemcn@erols.com, 

jschweit@socplas.org 

CHAPPELL.LlNDA@epamail.epa.gov, HERRlNC.LlNDA@epamail.epa.gov, 

MEYER.JAN@epamail.epa.gov 

Attached (WP 6.1 file) is the meeting summary from the September 18,1997 meeting on the industry MACT 

proposal. It is being sent to all participants whose email address I know (John Schweitzer, Steve McNally, Bob 

Lacovara, Rob Haberlein). I would appreciate it if John or Steve could make it available to the other industry meeting 

participants. As with all our summaries, it will be included in the docket for the reinforced plastic NESHAP. (If you 

see something that needs to be corrected please let me know since we can make the changes before putting it into 

the docket.) 

Melanie Proctor - 1 Wed, 7 Jan 1998 09:38:18 
P.3 

Docket No. A-W-5"^ 

Subcategory II- £ 

The enclosures with this document are docket item No.yfj£; & "* / ' I 

7s
# C_2013108EN.01000202.xml

| 13.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 7 February 2013 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium

(Case C-122/11) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 - Coordination of social security systems - National rules precluding the indexation, during the period until 1 August 2004, of pensions of nationals of a Member State which has not concluded a reciprocal agreement or who do not satisfy the condition of residence in the European Union - Residence in a non-member State - Breach of the principle of non-discrimination on grounds of nationality - Inadmissible)

2013/C 108/03

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: V. Kreushitz and G. Rozet, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Belgium (represented by: L. Van den Broeck and C. Pochet, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: E.-M Mamouna, acting as Agent)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Hellenic Republic

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Articles 4 and 7 of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems (OJ 2004 L 166, p. 1) and Articles 18 and 45 TFEU — National rules precluding the indexation, for the period until 1 August 2004, of pensions of nationals of a Member State which had not concluded a reciprocal agreement or who do not satisfy the condition of residence in the European Union — Residence in a non-member State — Infringement of the principle of non-discrimination on grounds of nationality — Lack of justification)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action as inadmissible.

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.

| 3. | Orders the Hellenic Republic to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Hellenic Republic to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 160, 28.5.2011

1

---
EXHIBIT 32

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

The undersigned officers of Motient Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), do hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their
knowledge:

     (i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended
     December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
     (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.


                                          /s/ Robert H. Brumley
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Robert H. Brumley
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
                                          (Principal Executive Officer)
                                          March 30, 2007


                                          /s/ Neil L. Hazard
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Neil L. Hazard
                                          Executive Vice President and Chief
                                          Financial Officer (Principal Financial
                                          Officer) March 30, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Motient Corporation and will be retained by Motient Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §6757. Report by the Association

#### (a) In general

As soon as practicable after the close of each fiscal year, the Association shall submit to the President, through the Department of the Treasury, and the States (including State insurance regulators), and shall publish on the website of the Association, a written report regarding the conduct of its business, and the exercise of the other rights and powers granted by this subchapter, during such fiscal year.

#### (b) Financial statements

Each report submitted under subsection (a) with respect to any fiscal year shall include audited financial statements setting forth the financial position of the Association at the end of such fiscal year and the results of its operations (including the source and application of its funds) for such fiscal year.

(Pub. L. 106–102, title III, §327, as added Pub. L. 114–1, title II, §202(a), Jan. 12, 2015, 129 Stat. 24.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to this section were contained in section 6762(c) of this title, prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 114–1.

A prior section 6757, Pub. L. 106–102, title III, §327, Nov. 12, 1999, 113 Stat. 1427, related to officers of the Association, prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 114–1.
### §5621. Purpose

The purpose of this subchapter is to encourage initiatives for financial products and services that are appropriate and accessible for millions of Americans who are not fully incorporated into the financial mainstream.

(Pub. L. 111–203, title XII, §1202, July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 2129.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subchapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this title", meaning title XII of Pub. L. 111–203, July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 2129, known as the Improving Access to Mainstream Financial Institutions Act of 2010, which is classified principally to this subchapter. For complete classification of title XII to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 5301 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Subchapter effective 1 day after July 21, 2010, except as otherwise provided, see section 4 of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as a note under section 5301 of this title.

#### Short Title

This subchapter known as the "Improving Access to Mainstream Financial Institutions Act of 2010", see Short Title note set out under section 5301 of this title.
#### § 720.111 Notice.

The agency shall make available to employees, applicants, participants, beneficiaries, and other interested persons such information regarding the provisions of this part and its applicability to the programs or activities conducted by the agency, and make such information available to them in such manner as the head of the agency finds necessary to apprise such persons of the protections against discrimination assured them by section 504 and this regulation.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION

The undersigned, as the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer of C&F
Financial Corporation, certify that to the best of their knowledge and belief the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of C&F Financial Corporation at the dates
and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose. The undersigned expressly disclaim any obligation
to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.



|                    |  |                        
|------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: March 6, 2006 |  | /s/ Larry G. Dillon    
|                    |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                    | 
|Date: March 6, 2006 |  | /s/ Thomas F. Cherry   
|                    |  | Chief Financial Officer
# C_2013171EN.01000301.xml

| 15.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 25 April 2013 — European Commission v Kingdom of the Netherlands

(Case C-65/11) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Taxation - Directive 2006/112/EC - Articles 9 and 11 - National legislation allowing the inclusion of non-taxable persons in a group of persons that may be regarded as a single taxable person for purposes of VAT - Consultation of the VAT Committee)

2013/C 171/04

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: A. Nijenhuis, R. Lyal and D. Triantafyllou, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: C. Wissels, M. de Ree and M. Noort, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the defendant: Czech Republic (represented by: M. Smolek, acting as Agent), Kingdom of Denmark (represented: initially by C. Vang, subsequently by V. Pasternak Jørgensen, acting as Agents), Ireland (represented by: D. O’Hagan acting as Agent, and by G. Clohessy, SC and N. Travers, BL), Republic of Finland (represented by: H. Leppo and S. Hartikainen, acting as Agents), the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented by: H. Walker, acting as Agent, and M. Hall, QC)

Interveners in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Articles 9 and 11 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1) — Inclusion of non-taxable persons in a VAT group — Failure to notify the VAT Committee of amendments to the implementation of the VAT group scheme

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.

| 3. | Orders the Czech Republic, the Kingdom of Denmark, Ireland, the Republic of Finland and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to bear their own respective costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Czech Republic, the Kingdom of Denmark, Ireland, the Republic of Finland and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to bear their own respective costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 130, 30.4.2011.

1

---
#### Tower Insurance Company of New York, Appellant, v Jasmattie Corlette et al., Respondents.

[826 NYS2d 131]

In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the plaintiff is not obligated to defend and indemnify the defendant Jasmattie Corlette in an underlying personal injury action entitled *Beresford v Corlette,*pending in the Supreme Court, Queens County, under index No. 22207/03, the plaintiff appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Schulman, J.), dated July 15, 2005, which, among other things, denied its motion for summary judgment, granted the defendant Jasmattie Corlette’s cross motion for summary judgment declaring that the plaintiff was obligated to defend and indemnify her in the underlying personal injury action, and, in effect, declared that the plaintiff was obligated to defend and indemnify the defendant Jasmattie Corlette in the underlying personal injury action.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

*793The underlying personal injury action arose out of an incident in which the defendant Rosamone Beresford slipped and fell at a single-family residence owned by the defendant Jasmattie Corlette. The homeowner’s insurance policy issued by the plaintiff, Tower Insurance Company of New York (hereinafter Tower), to Corlette, contained a clause that excluded coverage for any injury “[a]rising out of the rental. . . of an ‘insured location’ . . . [where] a single family unit is intended for use by the occupying family to lodge more than two roomers or boarders.” The policy, however, did not define the term “roomer.” Tower subsequently commenced this action, asserting that it was not obligated to defend and/or indemnify Corlette on the basis that the exclusionary clause applied.

Unless otherwise defined by the policy, words and phrases are to be understood in their plain, ordinary, and popularly understood sense *(see Government Empls. Ins. Co. v Kligler,*42 NY2d 863 [1977]; *Raino v Navigators Ins. Co.,*268 AD2d 419, 420 [2000] [“where the provisions of the policy are clear and unambiguous, they must be given their plain and ordinary meaning, and courts should refrain from rewriting the agreement”] [internal quotation marks omitted]; *Logan’s Silo Sales & Serv. v Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co.,*185 AD2d 651 [1992] [an unambiguous exclusionary clause must be given its plain and ordinary meaning]). However, any ambiguity in an insurance contract must be construed against the insurer and in favor of the policyholder *(see Hartol Prods. Corp. v Prudential Ins. Co.,*290 NY 44, 49 [1943]).

Under the particular facts of this case it cannot be said that the exclusionary clause applies. Adams, J.E, Ritter, Lunn and Covello, JJ., concur.
### SUBCHAPTER II—DISCRIMINATORY TAXES
### **CHAPTER 49—HOMEOWNERS PROTECTION**

Sec.
4901.
Definitions.
4902.
Termination of private mortgage insurance.
4903.
Disclosure requirements.
4904.
Notification upon cancellation or termination.
4905.
Disclosure requirements for lender paid mortgage insurance.
4906.
Fees for disclosures.
4907.
Civil liability.
4908.
Effect on other laws and agreements.
4909.
Enforcement.
4910.
Construction.
###### Editorial Note on Part 28

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear at 76 FR 76873, Dec. 9, 2011.

#### § 28.130 General authority.

The procedures in this subpart relate to the Board's functions “to consider, decide and order corrective or disciplinary action (as appropriate) in cases arising” from any area within the Board's jurisdiction.