alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 49 (Monday, March 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 13663]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5653]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-71,652]


Cooper Tools, Currently Known as Apex Tool Group, LLC, 
Hicksville, OH; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply 
for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(``Act''), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a 
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance 
on April 27, 2010, applicable to workers of Cooper Tools, Hicksville, 
Ohio. The workers are engaged in activities related to the production. 
The notice was published in the Federal Register on May 28, 2010 (75 FR 
30069).
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. New information shows 
that in July, 2010, Apex Tool Group, LLC. purchased Cooper Tools and is 
currently known as Apex Tool Group, LLC. Some workers separated from 
employment at Cooper Tools had their wages reported under a separate 
unemployment insurance (UI) tax accounts for Cooper Tools, currently 
known as Apex Tool Group, LLC.
    Accordingly, the Department is amending this certification to 
properly reflect this matter.
    The intent of the Department's certification is to include all 
workers of the subject firm who were adversely affected by increased 
imports of air tools, torque wrenches and screwdrivers.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-71,652 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Cooper Tools, currently known as Apex Tool Group, 
LLC, Hicksville, Ohio, who became totally or partially separated 
from employment on or after July 13, 2008 through April 27, 2012, 
and all workers in the group threatened with total or partial 
separation from employment on date of certification through two 
years from the date of certification, are eligible to apply for 
adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act 
of 1974, as amended.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 3rd day of March 2011.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011-5653 Filed 3-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
Statement to EPA August 2, 2010 

Air Quality Regulations Revision 

 

I come before you today to ask that 

 

1. Air Quality regulations be tightened to require that all gas wells and their associated storage and

processing equipment be required to have no vents to the atmosphere. Vapor recovery units must be 

required. 

2. Additionally, I would ask that you require gas well operators to pay for independent periodic analysis 

of their wellhead production stream and require publication thereof. 

3. I would ask that drillers be required to publish a complete list of all the ingredients of their fracking 

fluid because these ingredients are produced with the gas. 

4. I would also ask that a limit be imposed on the number of potential sources of gas production 

emissions per square mile for the sake of public safety. 

 

This industry is a mafia, a legalized mafia. Give them an inch and they’ll take a mile. This has been 

proven in every corner of the world in which they operate. They must be strictly regulated to protect

public health and safety at a minimum. Ideally the entire industry should be nationalized, although I

realize that is beyond your power. 

 

The power this industry has over local and state governments and in the halls of Congress is alarming 

and completely at odds with the intent of our Founding Fathers. To counter this we need to adopt new 

regulations that close the revolving door between industry and government. This need is not only 

apparent for the protection of air quality, but also for water quality and land quality. 

 

Please be aware of the broad regulatory needs in connection with this bad industry and don’t focus 

myopically on setting or resetting the emission limits for the various pollutants. Such limit tweaking 

will not solve the broad problem. 

 

Only as an independent advocate for public health and the environment can the EPA save the planet and 

humanity from the insatiable greed of the fossil energy industry. You are the keepers of the kingdom. 

Our very survival may well depend on you. 

Jerry Lobdill 

6336 Darwood Ave 

Fort Worth, TX 76116 

817-732-4648

My comments to the hearing of August 1, 2010 in Arlington, TX

Jerry Lobdill 

to: 

Nick Parsons 

08/02/2010 12:05 PM 

Show Details 

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Documents and Settings\nparsons\Local Settings\Temp\notesFCBCEE\~web1050.h... 8/9/2010
Manini
onset Tang,

2
Leg 3°

Reproductive
Size [+o

seis the k thich itely half r ies han
Ce re eae
+h larger than the -d should be left in the
See ere eet ek eee
Asan eenple ‘one 12-inch ‘@milu lays only +9,000 eggs while
"inch ‘omil il I.
Bz Uh | dared EPS ae ae adtnood.

“if you claim to bea fisherman, bea proud fisherman, know the resource,
take only what you need, get imvoved in management, and pass on this knowledge”
Wiliam AilaJr, fisherman

: ee
“Sass Grays eee
### **CHAPTER 9—COLLECTION AND PUBLICATION OF FOREIGN COMMERCE AND TRADE STATISTICS**

Sec.
301.
Collection and publication.
302.
Rules, regulations, and orders.
303.
Secretary of Treasury, functions. 1

304.
Filing export information, delayed filings, penalties for failure to file.
305.
Penalties for unlawful export information activities.
306.
Delegation of functions.
307.
Relationship to general census law.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2002**—Pub. L. 107–228, div. B, title XIV, §1404(f)(2), Sept. 30, 2002, 116 Stat. 1456, added item 305 and struck out former item 305 "Violations, penalties".

1  So in original. Does not conform to section catchline.
Order entered October 15, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00492-CV

IVERY T. WILLIAMS, Appellant

V.

DAVID GUTIERREZ, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-18-04233-A

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s October 10, 2019 motion to extend the time to file his 

amended brief. We GRANT the motion. We ORDER the amended brief tendered to this Court 

by appellant on October 4, 2019 filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL 

JUSTICE
SIGNED BOARD RESOLUTIONRESOLUTION NO. 97-14 A Resolution of the Governing Board of the South Coast Air Quality Management District Certifying thai Proposed Amended Rule 1610

- Old-Vehicle Scrapping is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental QualityAct (CEQA).

A Resolution of the Governing Board of the South Coast Air QualityManagement DistrictAmending Rule 1610

- Old-Vehicle Scrapping.

WhEREAS, South Coast Air Quality Management District staff reviewed the proposed project and detennined that it is exempt from the requirements ofCEQA; and

WHEREAS, the Governing Board of the South Coast Air Quality Management District has determined that no additional socioeconomic analyses are warranted since the emission control costs and cost-effectiveness values will notchange significantlyfromthe analysesperformed as partofRule 1610 adopted bythe Governing Board onJanuary 8, 1993; and

WHEREAS, a public hearing has been properly noticed in accordance withtheprovisions ofHealth and SafetyCode Section40725; and

WHEREAS, the Governing Board of the South Coast Air Quality Management District has determined that a need exists to adopt Proposed Amended Rule 1610

- Old-Vehicle Scrapping, in orderto furthersafeguard against potential toxic impacts and/or potential violations ofcriteria pollutant ambient air qualitystandards; and

WHEREAS, quantification methodologies used by sources calculating mobile source emission reduction credits needed shall be approved by the GoverningBoard; and

WHEREAS, the Governing Board of the South Coast Air Quality Management District obtains its authority to adopt, amend, or repeal rules and regulations from Sections 40000, 40001, 40440, 40441, 40463, 40702, and 40725 through40728 ofthe CaliforniaHealth and SafetyCode; and

WHEREAS, the Governing Board of the South Coast Air Quality Management District has determined that Proposed Amended Rule 1610

- Old-BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Governing Board of the

South Coast Air Quality Management District reaffirms the quantification methodologies used in calculating mobile source emission reduction credits needed where Rule 1610 has be used as an alternative method ofcompliance with Rules 1124, 1142, .1151, 1168, and 1171 asshowninAttachmentA.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that although facilities must assess health risk impacts in accordance with guidance used in implementing Rules 1401 and 1402 when using mobile source emission reduction credits as an alternative method ofcompliance as permitted by Rule 1610, Rules 1401 and 1402 shall not be considered partofthe State Implementation Plan.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the effective date ofthe above amendment is May9, 1997.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, thatthe Governing Board directs the Executive Officerand General Counselto use all remedies availableto obtain EPA approval ofthe above amendment.
AYES: Antonovich, Cluff Glover, Lee, Mikels, Paulitz, SilvaandWilson NOES: None ABSENT: Burke, Braude, Loveridge and Soto

DATE: ~

_________________ CLERkOFTHE DISTRICT BOARD
### §4003. Office of Export Trade in Department of Commerce

The Secretary of Commerce shall establish within the Department of Commerce an office to promote and encourage to the greatest extent feasible the formation of export trade associations and export trading companies. Such office shall provide information and advice to interested persons and shall provide a referral service to facilitate contact between producers of exportable goods and services and firms offering export trade services. The office shall establish a program to encourage and assist the operation of other export intermediaries, including existing and newly formed export management companies.

(Pub. L. 97–290, title I, §104, Oct. 8, 1982, 96 Stat. 1235; Pub. L. 100–418, title II, §2310, Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1346.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1988—Pub. L. 100–418 inserted requirement that the office establish a program to encourage and assist operation of other export intermediaries, including existing and newly formed export management companies.
<PAGE>




                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



The Board of Directors
XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-92326) on Form S-8 of Motient Corporation of our report dated January 23,
2002, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of XM Satellite Radio
Holdings Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and 2001 and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2001,
which report appears in the December 31, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K of
Motient Corporation.

Our report, dated January 23, 2002 contains an explanatory paragraph that states
that the XM Satellite Radio Holding Inc. and subsidiaries is dependent upon
additional debt or equity financing, which raises substantial doubt about its
ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do
not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of that
uncertainty.

                                                               /s/ KPMG LLP

McLean, Virginia
March 18, 2004
### §717u. Jurisdiction of offenses; enforcement of liabilities and duties

The District Courts of the United States and the United States courts of any Territory or other place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States shall have exclusive jurisdiction of violations of this chapter or the rules, regulations, and orders thereunder, and of all suits in equity and actions at law brought to enforce any liability or duty created by, or to enjoin any violation of, this chapter or any rule, regulation, or order thereunder. Any criminal proceeding shall be brought in the district wherein any act or transaction constituting the violation occurred. Any suit or action to enforce any liability or duty created by, or to enjoin any violation of, this chapter or any rule, regulation, or order thereunder may be brought in any such district or in the district wherein the defendant is an inhabitant, and process in such cases may be served wherever the defendant may be found. Judgments and decrees so rendered shall be subject to review as provided in sections 1254, 1291, and 1292 of title 28. No costs shall be assessed against the Commission in any judicial proceeding by or against the Commission under this chapter.

(June 21, 1938, ch. 556, §24, formerly §22, 52 Stat. 833; June 25, 1948, ch. 646, §1, 62 Stat. 875, 895; renumbered §24, Pub. L. 109–58, title III, §314(b)(1)(A), Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 690.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

The words "the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia" following "The District Courts of the United States" omitted as superfluous in view of section 132(a) of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, which states that "There shall be in each judicial district a district court which shall be a court of record known as the United States District Court for the district" and section 88 of title 28 which states that "The District of Columbia constitutes one judicial district".

"Sections 1254, 1291, and 1292 of title 28" substituted in text for "sections 128 and 240 of the Judicial Code, as amended [28 U.S.C. 225 and 347]" on authority of act June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 869, the first section of which enacted Title 28.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 24 of act June 21, 1938, was renumbered section 26 and is classified to section 717w of this title.
### §1540. Cooperative agreements

The Secretary of Commerce, acting through the Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere, may enter into cooperative agreements and other financial agreements with any nonprofit organization to—

(1) aid and promote scientific and educational activities to foster public understanding of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration or its programs; and

(2) solicit private donations for the support of such activities.

(Pub. L. 102–567, title IV, §406, Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4293.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Cooperative Agreements for Research, Education, Training, and Outreach

Pub. L. 108–199, div. B, title II, Jan. 23, 2004, 118 Stat. 71, provided in part: "That, hereafter, the Secretary of Commerce may enter into cooperative agreements with the Joint and Cooperative Institutes as designated by the Secretary to use the personnel, services, or facilities of such organizations for research, education, training, and outreach".

Similar provisions were contained in Pub. L. 108–7, div. B, title II, Feb. 20, 2003, 117 Stat. 74.
The Alabama Court of Civil Appeals

 

NATHAN P. WILSON 300 DEXTER AVENUE LYNN DEVAUGHN

 CLERK MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36104-3741 ASSISTANT CLERK

TELEPHONE 334-229-0733

October 4, 2024

CL-2023-0315

Earnest Coprich v. Bessie Elizabeth Jones (Appeal from Montgomery 

Circuit Court: CV-21-900720).

ORDER

You are hereby notified that the following action was taken in the 

above cause by the Court of Civil Appeals: 

Application for Rehearing Overruled. No opinion written on 

rehearing.

Moore, P.J., and Edwards, Hanson, Fridy, and Lewis, JJ., concur.

Nathan P. Wilson, Clerk
#### § 89.1 Amount of feed.

(a) Under normal conditions, the amount of feed designated in the following schedule will be considered as sustaining rations for livestock in transit when fed at the intervals required by the Twenty-Eight Hour Law:

| Species and quantity of livestock | At first feeding station | At second and subsequent feeding stations |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Cattle and beef type or range calves (for each car1) | 200 lbs. of hay1 2 | 300 lbs. of hay.1 2 |
| Dairy calves (for each car deck1) | 100 lbs. of hay1 2 | 150 lbs. of hay.1 2 |
| Horses and mules (for each car1) | 400 lbs. of hay1 2 | 400 lbs. of hay.1 2 |
| Sheep and goats (for each car deck1) | 200 lbs. of hay1 2 | 300 lbs. of hay.1 2 |
| Lambs and kids (for each car deck1) | 100 lbs. of hay1 2 | 150 lbs. of hay.1 2 |
| Swine (for each carload lot, in single or double deck car, the amount of shelled corn2 indicated): | | |
| Lots of not more than 18,000 lbs | 2 bushels | 2 bushels. |
| More than 18,000 lbs. but not more than 21,000 lbs | 21/2 bushels | 21/2 bushels. |
| More than 21,000 lbs. but not more than 24,000 lbs | 3 bushels | 3 bushels. |
| More than 24,000 lbs. but not more than 27,000 lbs | 31/2 bushels | 31/2 bushels. |
| More than 27,000 lbs. but not more than 30,000 lbs | 4 bushels | 4 bushels. |
| More than 30,000 lbs.—proportionately larger amounts | | |
| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1 The requirements set forth the sustaining rations for a full load of livestock in a railroad car 40 feet in length. The requirements for a full load of livestock in railroad cars of different sizes should be modified proportionately, *i.e.*, a load of livestock transported in a car 50 feet in length would require an additional 25 percent of feed or 2.5 percent for each additional foot of car over 40 feet. | | |
| 2 Or the equivalent in other suitable feed. Dairy calves too young to eat hay or grain, or shipped without their dams, should be given a sufficient amount of prepared calf feed, milk, raw eggs, or other suitable feed. All feed should be of good quality. | | |

(b) When the owner of a consignment of livestock desires that they be fed larger amounts of feed than those designated in [paragraph (a)](/on/2024-07-03/title-9/section-89.1#p-89.1(a)) of this section for the particular kind and quantity of livestock, or the carrier believes that they should be fed larger amounts, the amounts to be fed should be agreed upon, if practicable, by the owner and the carrier at the time the animals are offered for shipment.

(c) When emergency conditions arise, such as severe changes in the weather, which increase the rigors of transportation, the livestock should receive amounts of feed, additional to those designated in [paragraph (a)](/on/2024-07-03/title-9/section-89.1#p-89.1(a)) of this section, sufficient to sustain them until they arrive at the next feeding station or destination.

(d) When the movement of livestock is delayed en route so that the period of their confinement in the cars materially exceeds that specified by the Twenty-Eight Hour Law, the livestock should receive additional feed in proportion to such excess time.
#### DONNA LAWRENCE, Plaintiff v. LOAN KIM BARKER, et al., Defendants

Civil Case No. 357-79

Superior Court of Guam

July 26, 1979

ABBATE, *Presiding Judge*

DECISION AND ORDER

This matter came before the Court on the defendant Loan Kim Barker’s Motion for Summary Judgment on June 25, 1979. Randall Fennell appeared on behalf of the defendant and the plaintiff was represented by Ronald Geedman.

This is a wrongful death action in which the plaintiff seeks damages for pain and suffering, loss to the estate, and punitive damages. The present question is whether the damages prayed for by the plaintiff are properly recoverable in the context of a wrongful death action.

Generally, the only type of damages awarded in a wrongful death action are compensation for the pecuniary loss suffered by the plaintiff. *Estate of D’India,*63 C.A.3d 942; *626
      *Bond v. United Railroad,*113 P. 366; *Steel v. Imperial Airlines,*12 C.3d 115.

The rule in this jurisdiction is that damages to a decedent’s estate are an improper basis for damages in a wrongful death action. *Bradford v. Brock,*140 C.A. 47. Therefore, we find that damages for loss to the estate are not properly recoverable in this case.

It is also clear that punitive damages may not be had in a wrongful death action. *Doak v. Superior Court,*257 C.A.2d 825; *Lange v. Schoettler,*47 P. 139.

The last type of relief sought concerns the pain and suffering of the decedent. It is established that no recovery, based on the pain and suffering of the decedent, will be awarded in a wrongful death action. *Carr v. Pacific Telephone Co.,*26 C.A.3d 537; *Bond v. United Railroad,*supra.

For the aforementioned reasons, the defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to the issue of the damages prayed for in the complaint.

SO ORDERED.
^ •il-mRTMENTO F •:^^ix;S?ORT;;iiO N '^^/'' TOPERATION S SERVE D MARC H 14 , 201 1 

### "Oi l Y M 1 5 A

### !0^5 3

j-V"v - - >!'-'• » U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C I NTH EMATTE RO F 

### CONTINENTA LAIRLINES , INC . FA ADOCKE T No . CPlOSWOO l 1 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) DM S No . FAA-2010-097 8 I NTH EMATTE RO F 

### CONTINENTA LAIRLINES , INC . FA ADOCKE T No . CP10SW001 2 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) DM S No . FAA-2010-097 9 I NTH EMATTE RO F 

### CONTINENTA LAIRLINES , INC . FA ADOCKE T No . CP10SW001 3 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) DM S No . FAA-2010-098 0

## V U '

: • ! 1 l.l ^ 

# m i

FAk ^ 

# '

m

F-i.; . fe-J



### ^ ^ 3 M 1- " '
&' c 

# i!l) ' ;i* F fiti ^



## mf^ .

m-. 

### r^' ' It; . < 

### CDI^ O fcvj*

^^"- 4 

### FAJ(^# C

toberI2.13,and|iilil •«W5 4 to a s "Co t .HespoodenJC c



### . OnUm M e cases , c j R . § 13.21 J •y^ y withdra

w I t^s'th e cpm{>i8|iit | t} ^ administtiii i withprejudibe. " «

m f ^' ^ ^ - / gS^'^ ^ / • ••' " f . 

# p i 

# J ^w' * " ^p, ' 

# m ^ i 0" * " ' * ^

"*• ' i v : •'' : »•

£ '•% %
' '^^ 1 

# '^ i

' IK ? ' ^ « 

# '"i l ' ^ • i. i v,:K ^/ WHEREFORE , th e withi nfile dWitlidrawa l o f Complain t

havin g bee nrea dan d considered , i t

i s ORDERE D a s follows : 1 . Complainant' s Withdrawa l o f Complain t

b e an di s hereb y granted ; an d 2 . Thes e proceeding s b e an dare hereb y dismisse dwithprejudice . SO ORDERED .
Richar dC . Goodwi n U.S . Administrativ e Law Judg e Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis t b<i«f , «5S |

a'.-H i

if ;



# f ^ '^'i ^ '•-S - ; S



### W^ ^

S»-i l

aH«^ . ''« ; ^ a
#### § 367.4120 Account 412, Cost and expenses of construction or other services.

This account must include expenditures related to the performance of construction or service contracts, under which the service company undertakes projects to construct physical property for associate or non-associate companies (see General Instructions § 367.24, Construction and service contracts for other companies) and the cost of services performed for others not provided for elsewhere.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors of Solectron Corporation:

We consent to incorporation herein by reference our
report dated September 15, 2000, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Solectron Corporation and subsidiaries as of August 31, 2000 and 1999, and the
related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity, comprehensive income
and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended August 31, 2000, and the
related schedule, which report appears in the August 31, 2000, annual report on
Form 10-K of Solectron Corporation.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Mountain View, California
May 9, 2001

---