alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# White Paper - Methane and VOC Emissions from Compres sors >> Exterran's Comments

On behalf of Exterran and Mike Wasson (Director, Fl eet Services), I submit the attached comments to th e abovereferenced White Paper. We would greatly appreciate confirmation of receipt , and we look forward to addressing any questions o r comments the EPA has with respect to the attached o r any other compressor­related matter. Respectfully, Bill Bowes Associate General Counsel - North America EXTERRAN 16666 Northchase Drive Houston, Texas 77060 281.836.7040 office 281.836.8040 fax bill.bowes@exterran.com 

### Bill <Bill.Bowes@Exterran.com> Bowes, Mon 6/16/2014 4:11 PM To: OilandGas.Whitepapers <OilandGas.Whitepapers@epa.go v>; Cc: Wasson, Mike <Mike.Wasson@Exterran.com>; 

###  1 attachment Exterran Comments on Methane Compressor White PaperFINAL 06-16-14.pdf; 

### Page **1 of**  **1 White Paper** 
**- Methane and VOC Emissions from Compre...** 
**- OilandGas.Whitepapers** 

**8/ 27/**  **2014 https://pod51045.outlook.com/owa/OilandGas.Whitepapers@epa.gov/**
**Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 21 July 2011 – Fuchshuber Agrarhandel v Commission**

**(Case T-451/10)**

Action for damages – Common agricultural policy – Standing invitations to tender for the purchase of cereals on the Community market – Commission’s supervisory power – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals – Action obviously lacking any basis in law

1.                     *Non-contractual liability – Conditions – Unlawfulness – Damage – Causal link – One of the conditions not satisfied – Claim
for compensation dismissed in its entirety (Art. 288, second para., EC) (see paras 13, 15)*

2.                     *Non-contractual liability – Conditions – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals
– Discretion of the institution when adopting the measure – Need to be taken into consideration when examining liability (Art.
288, second para., EC) (see paras 14, 26)*

3.                     *Agriculture – Common agricultural policy – Financing by the EAGF and the EAFRD – Grant of aids and premiums – Obligation on
Member States to organise an efficient system of administrative controls and spot checks – Scope – Unreliable controls – Refusal
to assume responsibility (Art. 10 EC; Council Regulation No 1290/2005, Art. 9(1)) (see para. 19)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION seeking compensation for the loss allegedly suffered by the applicant because of the lack of supervision, by the Commission, of the conditions for implementing standing invitations to tender for the purchase of cereals on the Community market, in this case maize held by the Hungarian intervention agency. |

**Operative part**

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | The action is dismissed as obviously lacking any basis in law. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Fuchshuber Agrarhandel GmbH is ordered to bear its own costs and pay those of the European Commission. |
(68 South. 134)

No. 21181.

#### FOSTER et al. v. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF CITY OF SHREVEPORT. In re MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF CITY OF SHREVEPORT.

(March 22, 1915.)

*(Syllabus by the Court.)*

Certiorari <&wkey;12 — Prohibition <&wkey;5 — Preliminary Injunction — Dismissal.

Where plaintiffs in an injunction suit, after the issuance of a preliminary injunction, move to dismiss the suit at their cost, the application by defendants to this court for writs of certiorari and prohibition in the cause will be dismissed, as there is no suit pending in the district court.

[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Certiorari, Cent. Dig. § 18; Dec. Dig. &wkey;>12; Prohibition, . Cent. Dig. §§ 20-30; Dec. Dig. <&wkey;5.]

Suit by J. C. Foster and others against the Mayor and City Council of the City of Shreveport. Suit dismissed, and defendants apply for certiorari, mandamus, and prohibition.

Rule nisi recalled, and proceedings dismissed.

Lewell C. Butler, City Atty., of Shreveport (Thigpen & I-Ierold, of Shreveport, of counsel), for applicants. Hall & Jack and Foster, Looney & Wilkinson, all of Shreveport, for plaintiffs. R. D. Webb, in pro. per.

SOMMERVILLE, J.

R. D. Webb, judge of the First judicial district court of Louisiana, in and for the parish of Caddo, was ordered, March 3d, to show cause, March 15, 1915, why the writ of prohibition asked for by the defendants in this cause, relators in this court, should not issue, restraining him from proceeding further in the enforcement of a preliminary writ of injunction, issued March 1st, to prevent an election being held in the city of Shreveport on March 4, 1915.

In his return made this day, in response to the order of the court, the district judge shows that this suit was dismissed, on motion of the plaintiffs, March 6, 1915, at the cost of plaintiffs. There is no suit" pending.

The rule nisi issued herein is recalled; and this proceeding is dismissed.
# C_2007095EN.01004001.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/40

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 22 March 2007 — Saint-Gobain Pam v OHIM — Propamsa (PAM PLUVIAL)

(Case T-364/05) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark PAM PLUVIAL - Earlier national figurative marks PAM - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Proof of use - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 43 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

(2007/C 95/80)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Saint-Gobain Pam SA (Nancy, France) (represented by: J. Blanchard and G. Marchais, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Rassat, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Propamsa, SA (Barcelona, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 April 2005 (Case R 414/2004-4) concerning registration of the word mark PAM PLUVIAL and relating to opposition proceedings between Propamsa, SA and Saint-Gobain Pam SA.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the applicant, Saint-Gobain Pam SA, to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant, Saint-Gobain Pam SA, to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 315, 10.12.2005.

1

---
#### § 281.201 Purpose.

The purpose of this subpart is to implement section 401 of the NGPA in order to provide that effective November 1, 1979, the curtailment plans of interstate pipelines protect, to the maximum extent practicable, deliveries of natural gas for essential agricultural uses and for high-priority uses in accordance with the provisions of this subpart.

[44 FR 26862, May 8, 1979]
Exhibit 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Image
Innovations Holdings Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2005,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Derick Sinclair, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Date:  May 23, 2005                       By:       /s/ Derick Sinclair
                                             -----------------------------------
                                                    Derick Sinclair
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
----

   **CERTIFICATION OF   CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER   PURSUANT TO   18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 I, Christopher Smith, Chief Financial Officer of Image Innovations Holdings  Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB  of Image Innovations Holdings Inc., for the quarterly period ending June 30,  2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report  on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition  and results of operations of Image Innovations Holdings Inc. 

By:*      */s/  Christopher Smith*                                    *

Name: Christopher Smith

Title:   Chief Financial Officer

Date:   October 8, 2003
#### § 71.5 Unsanitary railroad cars, trucks, boats, aircraft or other means of conveyance; interstate movement restricted.

No person who receives notice from an APHIS representative that a railroad car, truck, boat, aircraft or other means of conveyance owned or operated by such person is not in a clean and sanitary condition in accordance with good animal husbandry practices, shall thereafter use such means of conveyance in connection with the interstate movement of livestock or poultry, or move said means of conveyance interstate, until it has been cleaned and disinfected under the supervision of an APHIS or State representative or an accredited veterinarian in accordance with §§ 71.7 and 71.10 through 71.12.

[34 FR 15641, Oct. 9, 1969, as amended at 55 FR 11156, Mar. 27, 1990; 55 FR 15320, Apr. 23, 1990; 62 FR 27933, May 22, 1997]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Government Printing Office

                    The Depository Library Council to the Public Printer (DLC) will meet on Monday, April 4, 2011 through Wednesday, April 6, 2011, in San Antonio, Texas. The sessions will take place from 8 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. on Monday through Tuesday. On Wednesday the session will be 8 a.m. to 12 p.m. The meeting will be held at the Crowne Plaza Riverwalk San Antonio located at 111 East Pecan Street, San Antonio, Texas. The purpose of this meeting is to discuss the Federal Depository Library Program. All sessions are open to the public. The sleeping rooms available at the Crowne Plaza Riverwalk, San Antonio, Texas will be at the government rate of $106 (plus applicable state and local taxes, currently 16.75%) a night for a single or                           ( print page 13618)                        double. The Crowne Plaza Riverwalk is in compliance with the requirements of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act and meets all Fire Safety Act regulations.                

William J. Boarman,

Public Printer of the United States.

[FR Doc. 2011-5832 Filed 3-11-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1520-01-P
# C_2007011EN.01000401.xml

| 17.1.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 11/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.1.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 11/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

16 January 2007

(2007/C 11/06)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2953 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 156,27 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4524 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,65920 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0621 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6138 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 91,42 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3140 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5784 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,763 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 252,84 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6975 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8828 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,3844 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 34,767 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8575 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6511 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5127 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1032 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8585 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9936 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 211,82 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,3670 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,0904 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3600 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 751,61 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5361 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,081 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,3880 |
| THB | Thai baht | 46,486 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2953

JPY

Japanese yen

156,27

DKK

Danish krone

7,4524

GBP

Pound sterling

0,65920

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0621

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6138

ISK

Iceland króna

91,42

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3140

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5784

CZK

Czech koruna

27,763

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

252,84

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6975

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8828

RON

Romanian leu

3,3844

SKK

Slovak koruna

34,767

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8575

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6511

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5127

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1032

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8585

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9936

KRW

South Korean won

1 211,82

ZAR

South African rand

9,3670

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,0904

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3600

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 751,61

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5361

PHP

Philippine peso

63,081

RUB

Russian rouble

34,3880

THB

Thai baht

46,486

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
# ORIGINAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 21-0190
STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiffand Appellee,
v. LISA ROSE HUEY-MCLEOD,

Defendant and Appellant. 

### FEB 08 2022 Bowen Greenwoc ,ck of Supreme Court state of Montena ORDER

Appellant Lisa Rose Huey-McLeod (McLeod) appeals the First Judicial District Court's June 17, 2020 revocation ofher fully suspended 2010 sentence in Lewis and Clark County Cause Number BDC-2010-62. On revocation,theDistrict Court sentencedMcLeod totwenty years in the MontanaWomen'sPrisonwith ten suspended on Count I and ten years on Count II, with all ten years suspended. The District Court's written judgment credits Ms. McLeod withjail time served from January toJune of2020 but does not credit her with the 113 daysjail time awarded her in the 2010judgment. Theparties have filed a stipulation agreeingthat thejudgment should be amended to include an award of credit for the 113 days included in the initial judgment. Appellant's counsel represents that he has identified no other meritorious issues for appeal and that McLeod agrees this is the proper course ofaction. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is REMANDED to the First Judicial District Court, Lewis and Clark County, with instructions to amend its July 28, 2020 Amended Judgment and Comtnitment in Lewis and Clark County Cause Number BDV 2010-62 to award McLeod 113 days of credit for jail time served as awarded in the 2010 judgment. Upon entry ofthe Second Amended Judgment, the Clerk of the District Court shall send a certified copy ofthe same to the Records Department ofthe Department ofCorrections. 02/08/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0190There being no other issues on appeal,

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the appeal is DISMISSED. The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis Order to all counsel ofrecord, to the Clerk of District Court for Lewis and Clark County, and to the Honorable Michael McMahon, presidingjudge. DATED this 'e t- day ofFebruary, 2022.

ChiefJustice 

# (6?2,

Justices eS ) 4 .2 01

4„.„„
§ 93.707 Inspection at the port of first arrival. ( a ) A hedgehog or tenrec from any part of the world must be inspected by an APHIS inspector at the port of first arrival. Subject to the other provisions in this subpart, a shipment of hedgehogs or tenrecs may enter the United States only if each hedgehog or tenrec in the shipment is found free of ectoparasites and any clinical signs of communicable diseases.
( b ) If any hedgehog or tenrec in a shipment is found to be infested with ectoparasites or demonstrates any clinical signs of communicable diseases, then the entire shipment will be refused entry. The importer will be given the following options: ( 1 ) Remove the shipment from the United States; or
( 2 ) Release the shipment to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The Administrator will destroy or otherwise dispose of the shipment as necessary to prevent the possible introduction into the United States of communicable animal diseases.
# C_2013344EN.01001801.xml

| 23.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 344/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 344/18

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 September 2013 — Alliance One International, Inc. v European Commission

(Case C-668/11 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Spanish market for the purchase and first processing of raw tobacco - Price-fixing and market-sharing - Infringement of Article 81 EC - Whether unlawful conduct of a subsidiary attributable to its parent company - Deterrent effect - Equal treatment - Cooperation - Obligation to state reasons - Mitigating circumstances)

2013/C 344/29

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Alliance One International, Inc. (represented by: M. Odriozola and A. Vide, Abogados)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre, and J. Bourke, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 12 October 2011 in Case T-38/05 Agroexpansion v Commission, by which the General Court rejected, in part, an application for the partial annulment of Commission Decision C(2004) 4030 final of 20 October 2004 relating to a proceeding under Article 81(1) [EC] (Case COMP/C.38.238/B2 — Raw tobacco — Spain)

Agroexpansion

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Alliance One International, Inc. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Alliance One International, Inc. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 89, 24.3.2012.

1

---
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Dana S. Philbrook, hereby certify that:

(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Service Bancorp, Inc.;

(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3) Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;

(4) The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control
over financial reporting; and

(5) The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal controls over financial reporting.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ DANA S. PHILBROOK  
|Dana S. Philbrook      
|Chief Financial Officer
|November 13, 2006
#### § 94.22 Meat or dressed carcasses of hunter-harvested bovines.

The meat or dressed carcass (eviscerated and the head is removed) is derived from a wild bovine that has been legally harvested in the wild, as verified by proof such as a hunting license, tag, or the equivalent that the hunter must show to the authorized inspector.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0393)

[78 FR 72999, Dec. 4, 2013]
#### Robert L. Geltzer, as Chapter 7 Trustee of Bombora House, Inc., et al., Respondents, v DuFour Pastry Kitchens, Inc., Appellant.

[828 NYS2d 294]

Order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, First *365Department, entered September 23, 2005, affirming an order of Civil Court, New York County (Donna G. Recant, J.), entered on or about July 23, 2004, which directed a hearing to determine the appropriate rental amount for the renewal term of respondent-appellant ’ s sublease, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The sublease specifically incorporated the provisions of the overlease, which effectively set rent for the renewal period as “fair market” rent (see *B. Boman & Co. v Professional Data Mgt.,*218 AD2d 637 [1995]). Unlike the boilerplate provision at issue in *NFS Engrs. & Constructors v Underweiser & Underweiser*(73 NY2d 996 [1989], *modfg*141 AD2d 412 [1988] *for reasons stated in dissenting mem),*the provision in the sublease here incorporating the overlease was specifically modified by the parties to exclude certain overlease provisions. The exclusions, however, did not encompass the overlease’s provision respecting the rental amount for the renewal period. Indeed, the sublease, apart from its incorporation of the overlease terms, makes no provision respecting the rental amount for the renewal period. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.E, Saxe, Marlow, Sullivan and Williams, JJ.