alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Antonio Ali-Rachedi, Appellant.

[824 NYS2d 451]

Spain, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schoharie County (Bartlett III, J.), rendered August 21, 2002, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crimes of rape in the first degree (two counts), sodomy in the first degree (three counts), sexual abuse in the first degree, rape in the third degree (three counts) and endangering the welfare of a child (six counts).

Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of numerous crimes stemming from his repeated sexual abuse of several children. He was thereafter sentenced to an aggregate prison term of 25 years. Defendant now appeals.

We affirm. Inasmuch as defendant refused to be interviewed by the Probation Department, he cannot be heard to complain that the presentence investigation report was incomplete *(see People v Rosado,*29 AD3d 430, 431 [2006]; *People v Roman,*254 AD2d 156, 157 [1998], *lv denied*92 NY2d 1053 [1999]; see *also People v Greene,*209 AD2d 541, 542 [1994], *lv denied*85 NY2d 909 [1995]). In any event, defendant’s claims regarding deficiencies in the report are without merit. Defendant was afforded the opportunity at sentencing to challenge the content of the report and, while County Court noted certain instances where the report should be modified based upon defendant’s denial of much of the reported conduct, actual physical redaction of the report was not necessary *(see People v Thomas,*2 AD3d 982, 984 [2003], *lv denied*1 NY3d 602 [2004]). Moreover, the report was in compliance with statutory requirements *(see*CPL 390.30).

We likewise reject defendant’s contention that the sentences imposed were harsh and excessive. Acknowledging the nature of *982the crimes and defendant’s victimization of children, we find neither an abuse of discretion by County Court nor the existence of extraordinary circumstances warranting modification *(see People v Wallis,*24 AD3d 1029, 1033 [2005], *lv denied*6 NY3d 854 [2006]; *People v Meiner,*20 AD3d 778, 779 [2005]; *People v Neer,*8 AD3d 753, 753 [2004], *lv denied*3 NY3d 679 [2004]).

Cardona, P.J., Carpinello, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
April 17, 2002

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Re:   T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund, Inc. (the "Registrant")
         File Nos.: 002-43237/811-2215
         Post-Effective Amendment No. 37

Commissioners:

We are counsel to the above-referenced registrant which proposes to file,
pursuant to paragraph (b) of Rule 485 (the "Rule"), the above-referenced
Post-Effective Amendment (the "Amendment") to its registration statement under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

Pursuant to paragraph (b)(4) of the Rule, we represent that the Amendment does
not contain disclosures which would render it ineligible to become effective
pursuant to paragraph (b) of the Rule.

Sincerely,

\s\Shearman & Sterling
Shearman & Sterling
# C_2007060EN.01000101.xml

| 15.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

14 March 2007

(2007/C 60/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3183 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 153,66 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4507 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68535 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3068 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6070 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 89,04 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1225 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5794 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,148 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 251,28 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7083 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9030 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,3791 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 34,026 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8757 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6838 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5495 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,3026 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9137 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0233 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 247,18 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,8359 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,2010 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3680 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 154,07 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6292 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 64,023 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,4920 |
| THB | Thai baht | 43,400 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3183

JPY

Japanese yen

153,66

DKK

Danish krone

7,4507

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68535

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3068

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6070

ISK

Iceland króna

89,04

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1225

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5794

CZK

Czech koruna

28,148

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

251,28

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7083

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9030

RON

Romanian leu

3,3791

SKK

Slovak koruna

34,026

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8757

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6838

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5495

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,3026

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9137

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0233

KRW

South Korean won

1 247,18

ZAR

South African rand

9,8359

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,2010

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3680

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 154,07

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6292

PHP

Philippine peso

64,023

RUB

Russian rouble

34,4920

THB

Thai baht

43,400

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONDENSED
BALANCE  SHEETS AND CONDENSED  STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-28-1996
<CASH>                                         12,693
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  13,212
<ALLOWANCES>                                    3,174
<INVENTORY>                                     9,851
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               38,158
<PP&E>                                          6,312
<DEPRECIATION>                                  4,788
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 39,996
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          13,057
<BONDS>                                             0
<COMMON>                                       25,322
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                      1,587
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   39,996
<SALES>                                        66,990
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               66,990
<CGS>                                          40,220
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  40,220
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               28,108
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  487
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 12
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (733)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (276)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (457)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (457)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)
        


</TABLE>
### §3059. Unfair or deceptive acts or practices

The sale of a covered horse, or of any other horse in anticipation of its future participation in a covered race, shall be considered an unfair or deceptive act or practice in or affecting commerce under section 45(a) of this title if the seller—

(1) knows or has reason to know the horse has been administered—

(A) a bisphosphonate prior to the horse's fourth birthday; or

(B) any other substance or method the Authority determines has a long-term degrading effect on the soundness of the covered horse; and

(2) fails to disclose to the buyer the administration of the bisphosphonate or other substance or method described in paragraph (1)(B).

(Pub. L. 116–260, div. FF, title XII, §1210, Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 3274.)
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

The Board of Directors 

Orthovita, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statement (Nos. 333-66681, 333-90981, 333-100034, 333-107282, 333-118219, 333-131667, 333-145723 and 333-151977) on Form S-8 and in the Registration Statement (Nos. 333-47386, 333-59288, 333-84632, 333-88334, 333-100341, 333-107210,333-111697, 333-118216, 333-131668, 333-145724 and 333-141403) on Form S-3 of Orthovita, Inc. and subsidiaries of our reports dated March 16, 2009, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Orthovita, Inc. and subsidiaries as ofDecember 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and comprehensive loss and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008, and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, which reports appear in the December 31, 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Orthovita, Inc. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

March 16, 2009
§ 385.509 Admissibility of evidence (Rule 509). ( a ) *General standard.* The presiding officer should exclude from evidence any irrelevant, immaterial, or unduly repetitious material. The presiding officer may also exclude from evidence any other material which the presiding officer determines is not of the kind which would affect reasonable and fair-minded persons in the conduct of their daily affairs.
( b ) *Ruling on evidence.* ( 1 ) The presiding officer will rule on the admissibility of any evidence offered.
( 2 ) If any participant objects to the admission or exclusion of evidence, the participant must state briefly the grounds for the objection.
( 3 ) The presiding officer will not permit formal exceptions to any ruling on evidence. This prohibition against formal exceptions does not preclude a participant from raising, as an issue, the validity of any ruling on evidence later in the proceeding, consistent with Rule 711.
[Order 225, 47 FR 19022, May 3, 1982, as amended by Order 225-A, 47 FR 35956, Aug. 18, 1982]
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 47 (Thursday, March 10, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 13187]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5394]

[[Page 13187]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION

Update to Notice of Financial Institutions for Which the Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation Has Been Appointed Either Receiver, 
Liquidator, or Manager

AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

ACTION: Update Listing of Financial Institutions in Liquidation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation (Corporation) has been appointed the sole receiver for the 
following financial institutions effective as of the Date Closed as 
indicated in the listing. This list (as updated from time to time in 
the Federal Register) may be relied upon as ``of record'' notice that 
the Corporation has been appointed receiver for purposes of the 
statement of policy published in the July 2, 1992 issue of the Federal 
Register (57 FR 29491). For further information concerning the 
identification of any institutions which have been placed in 
liquidation, please visit the Corporation Web site at http://www.fdic.gov/bank/individual/failed/banklist.html or contact the 
Manager of Receivership Oversight in the appropriate service center.

    Dated: February 28, 2011.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Pamela Johnson,
Regulatory Editing Specialist.

                                           Institutions in Liquidation
                                             (In alphabetical order)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    FDIC Ref. No.              Bank name                 City                 State              Date closed
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10347................  Valley Community Bank...  St. Charles........  IL                    2/25/2011.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2011-5394 Filed 3-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6741-01-P
```
§ 93.323 Inspection. ( a ) All horses offered for entry from Mexico, including such horses intended for movement through the United States in bond for immediate return to Mexico, shall be inspected at a facility described in § 93.324, and all such horses found to be free from communicable disease and fever tick infestation, and not to have been exposed thereto, shall be admitted into the United States subject to the other applicable provisions of this part. Horses found to be affected with or to have been exposed to a communicable disease, or infested with fever ticks, shall be refused entry. Horses refused entry, unless exported within a time fixed in each case by the Administrator, shall be disposed of as said Administrator may direct.
( b ) Horses covered by paragraph (a) of this section shall be imported through facilities described in § 93.324, which are equipped with facilities necessary for proper chute inspection, dipping, and testing, as provided in this part.
[55 FR 31495, Aug. 2, 1990, as amended at 58 FR 45238, Aug. 27, 1993. Redesignated at 62 FR 56012, 56017, Oct. 28, 1997]
§ 367.1110 Account 111, Accumulated provision for amortization of service company property. ( a ) This account must be credited with the following: ( 1 ) Amounts charged to account 404, Amortization of limited-term property (§ 367.4040), for the current amortization of limited-term service company property investments.
( 2 ) Amounts charged to account 405, Amortization of other property (§ 367.4050).
( 3 ) Amounts charged to account 425, Miscellaneous amortization (§ 367.4250), for the amortization of intangible or other property, that does not have a definite or terminable life and is not subject to charges for depreciation expense, with Commission approval.
( b ) The service company must maintain subaccounts of this account for the amortization applicable to service company property and property leased to others.
( c ) When any property to which this account applies is sold, relinquished, or otherwise retired from service, this account must be charged with the amount previously credited in respect to the property. The book cost of the retired property less the amount chargeable to this account and less the net proceeds realized at retirement must be included in account 421.1, Gain on disposition of property (§ 367.4211), or account 421.2, Loss on disposition of property (§ 367.4212), as appropriate.
( d ) For general ledger and balance sheet purposes, this account must be regarded and treated as a single composite provision for amortization. The subsidiary records must reflect the current credits and debits to this account in sufficient detail to show the following separately: ( 1 ) The amount of accrual for amortization,
( 2 ) The book cost of property retired,
( 3 ) Cost of removal,
( 4 ) Salvage, and
( 5 ) Other items, including recoveries from insurance.
( e ) The service company is restricted in its use of the accumulated provision for amortization to the purposes provided in paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section. It must not transfer any portion of this account to retained earnings or make any other use of the amortization without authorization by the Commission.
#### § 375.103 Official seal.

The Commission hereby prescribes as its official seal, judicial notice of which shall be taken pursuant to section 401(e) of the DOE Act, the imprint illustrated below and described as follows:

A circle, the outside border of which shall consist of two concentric circles enclosing the words “Department of Energy” and “Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.” Within the inner circle shall appear a stylized eagle with head facing to its right. Its body shall be in the shape of a tapered shield, widest at the top, consisting of nine vertical stripes. The top of the shield contains five equally-spaced light color stars representing the five members of the Commission appointed by the President under Title IV of the DOE Act. Identical stylized wings appear on either side of the shield, each incorporating twenty stylized feathers protruding from a solid color wing-like shape. Below the eagle shall appear five squares, arranged in a horizontal line. Each of these squares shall contain a circle representing an area of the Commission's responsibility. The first square at the left of the line shall include a stylized representation of a pipeline; the second square shall represent a hydroelectric power facility; the third, and center square, shall represent a natural gas flame; the fourth square shall represent a drilling rig; the fifth square shall represent a stylized lightning bolt.

[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/EC05OC91.036/EC05OC91.036_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/EC05OC91.036/EC05OC91.036_original_size.png)
#### § 286.108 Determination.

If no formal hearing is had the matter in issue will be determined by the Commission on the basis of the facts and arguments submitted.
### , ~ --r'~



### ' NHDES Thomas S
. Burack, Commissioner March 2, 2012 Mr
. Curt Spalding Regional Administrator USEPA New

England, Region I 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100 Boston, MA02109-3912 Re: Maintenance Plan for New Hampshire's Former 1-hr Ozone Nonattainment Areas Dear Administrator Spalding: Pursuant to Section 110 of the federal Clean Air Act as amended, the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services (NHDES) submits one paper copy and one electronic copy ofthis State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision containing a maintenance plan for New Hampshire's former 1- hr ozone nonattainment areas. The enclosed disk is an exact duplicate of the paper copy, as well as additional data files supporting Attachment Aof the maintenance plan
. NHDEShas prepared this SIP revision in accordance with the general SIP submittal requirements of 40CFRPart 51 Appendix V, EPA regulations and guidance on redesignations, and New Hampshire laws and regulations
. As Governor John Lynch's designee, I am requesting EPA's approval ofthis SIPrevision, which addresses those areas in Cheshire, Hillsborough, Merrimack, Rockingham, and Strafford counties that were formerly nonattainment for the 1-hr ozone standard, but which were classified as attainment/unclassifiable for the 8-hr ozone standard
. EPA provided comments on the proposed SIP revision, which NHDES has addressed in the administrative documents attached to the enclosed plan, including documentation certifying the public process. Ifyou have any questions regarding this submittal, please contact Charles Martone at (603) 271- 1089
. Sincerely, Roberf R
. Scott Director, Air Resources Division rrs/chm enclosure

: NHOzone Maintenance Plan SIP Revision w/ attachments (on paper and disk) ec: Anne Arnold, USEPA Region I The State of New Hampshire DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

DES Web Site: www

.des.nh.gov P .O
. Box 95, 29 Hazen Drive, Concord, New Hampshire 03302-0095 Telephone: (603) 271-3503 Fax: (603) 271-2181 TDD Access: Relay NH 1-800-735-2964
# C_2011113EN.01002101.xml

| 9.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/21

---

Order of the General Court of 17 February 2011 — Suez Environnement and Lyonnaise des eaux France v Commission

(Case T-274/10) (1)

1

2011/C 113/43

Language of the case: French

The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 234, 28.8.2010.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Service Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Pamela J. Montpelier, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-B (Item 601(b)(32))
promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Securities Act) and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act). In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not
be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/ PAMELA J. MONTPELIER
|Pamela J. Montpelier    
|Chief Executive Officer 

May 12, 2006
TRANSFER TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL CORP.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Transfer Technology International Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert J. Calamunci, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Robert J. CalamunciRobert J. CalamunciChief Financial Officer

Chief Accounting OfficerAugust 2, 2010





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Transfer Technology International Corp. and will be retained by Transfer Technology International Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.