alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

 

STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT 

Rural Communities Encouraged to Apply for USDA Water and Waste Disposal Loans and Take 

Advantage of Historically Low Interest Rates 

(April 1, 2016) – USDA Rural Utilities Service Administrator Brandon McBride today announced that interest 

rates have fallen to historic lows for USDA water and waste disposal loans and encouraged rural towns and 

cities to apply for funding assistance. 

The following rates are available through June 30, 2016:

 Market: 2.875%

 Intermediate: 2.25%

 Poverty: 1.75%

Applications may be submitted by most state and local governmental entities, private non-profits, and federallyrecognized tribes who are unable to obtain commercial credit at reasonable rates. 

Applicants are encouraged to use Rural Development’s new online application tool RD Apply. 

The Water and Waste Disposal Loan and Grant Program provides funding to construct clean and reliable 

drinking water systems, sanitary sewage disposal, sanitary solid waste disposal, and storm water drainage to 

households and businesses in rural areas with a population of 10,000 or less. 

Additional information on this program is available by contacting a Community Programs specialist in a USDA 

Rural Development state or area office.
###### Editorial Note on Part 28

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear at 76 FR 76873, Dec. 9, 2011.

#### § 28.148 Reporting of communications.

Any communication made in violation of this section shall be made part of the record in the proceeding and an opportunity for rebuttal allowed. If the communication was oral, a memorandum stating the substance of the discussion shall be placed in the record.
# C_2010221EN.01005302.xml

| 14.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/53

---

Action brought on 16 June 2010 — Spain v Commission

(Case T-265/10)

()

2010/C 221/85

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: Mrs Nuria Díaz Abad, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the European Commission of 15 April 2010 declaring the suspension of the interim payment application submitted by Spain on 11 December 2009 on the grounds stated in Section I of the legal reasoning set out in the originating application; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the European Commission of 15 April 2010 declaring the suspension of the interim payment application submitted by Spain on 11 December 2009 on the grounds stated in Section I of the legal reasoning set out in the originating application;

| — | Uphold the claim that the European Commission should pay interest on account of the delay in the actual payment of the interim sums applied for and improperly suspended; |
| --- | --- |

—

Uphold the claim that the European Commission should pay interest on account of the delay in the actual payment of the interim sums applied for and improperly suspended;

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The present action is brought against the Commission’s decision to interrupt the payment deadline in respect of the interim payment application submitted by Spain on 11 December 2009. That interim payment application, for a total amount of EUR 27 754 408,38,relates to the Operational Programmes for Community Assistance of the European Social Fund in the framework of the Objectives of Convergence for the Autonomous Community of Galicia (CCI 2007ES051PO004).

The pleas in law and main arguments are the same as those already raised in Case T-263/10 Spain v Commission.

Spain

Commission

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the report of Prospect Medical Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2007 (the "Report"), I,
Samuel S. Lee, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|June 9, 2008 |  | /s/SAMUEL S. LEESamuel S. Lee
Chief Executive Officer
|------------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
# C_2006261EN.01003002.xml

| 28.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/30

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 5 September 2006 — Alofs v Commission

(Case T-239/99) (1)

1

(2006/C 261/58)

Language of the case: Dutch

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Second Chamber Extended Composition has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 6, 8.1.2000.

1

---
-1-

S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N

C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

LITTLE TREE SUSHI BAR, INC., DIXIE MOON 

SALOON, LLC, THE NASH FAMILY LIMITED 

PARTNERSHIP, M & R REALTY 111 SOUTH 

MAIN, LLC, SULLIVAN INVESTMENT 

GROUP LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, THIRD 

STREET PROPERTIES, INC., CORP ONE, INC., 

GROUP 225, INC., CORP ONE PROPERTY 

COMPANY, LLC, ONE HUNDRED SEVEN 

SOUTH MAIN, LLC, and R & M REALTY, LLC,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

UNPUBLISHED

July 31, 2018

v No. 341606

Oakland Circuit Court

CITY OF ROYAL OAK, LC No. 2017-159908-CZ

Defendant-Appellee, 

and

CENTRAL PARK DEVELOPMENT GROUP, 

LLC,

Intervening Defendant-Appellee.

Before: CAMERON, P.J., and JANSEN and O’CONNELL, JJ.

JANSEN, J. (concurring). 

I concur in the result only. 

/s/ Kathleen Jansen
### §13b. Cooperative association; return of net earnings or surplus

Nothing in this Act shall prevent a cooperative association from returning to its members, producers, or consumers the whole, or any part of, the net earnings or surplus resulting from its trading operations, in proportion to their purchases or sales from, to, or through the association.

(June 19, 1936, ch. 592, §4, 49 Stat. 1528.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is act June 19, 1936, ch. 592, 49 Stat. 1526, popularly known as the Robinson-Patman Antidiscrimination Act and also as the Robinson-Patman Price Discrimination Act, which enacted sections 13a, 13b, and 21a of this title and amended section 13 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 13 of this title and Tables.
Exhibit 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION OF
 CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 
 In connection with this Amended Quarterly Report of Mega Media Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gennady Pomeranets, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies
to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1. Such Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2. The information contained in such Amended Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Mega Media Group, Inc.
 
 By:
/s/ Gennady PomeranetsGENNADY POMERANETSChief Financial Officer,Date:
September 29, 2009
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We consentto the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-92326, 333-117148, 333-118728, 333-136845 and 333-152213) and on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-136046, 333-136366, 333-143680 and 333-152188) of TerreStar Corporation of ourreports dated March 16, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of TerreStar Corporation and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of TerreStar Corporation included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) ofTerreStar Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2009. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

McLean, Virginia 

March 16, 2010
```

[113th Congress Public Law 266]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 128 STAT. 2944]]

Public Law 113-266
113th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 73839 Gorgonio Drive in Twentynine Palms, California, as the ``Colonel 
     M.J. `Mac' Dube, USMC Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Dec. 18, 
                         2014 -  [H.R. 5331]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. COLONEL M.J. ``MAC'' DUBE, USMC POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 73839 Gorgonio Drive in Twentynine Palms, California, shall 
be known and designated as the ``Colonel M.J. `Mac' Dube, USMC Post 
Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Colonel 
M.J. `Mac' Dube, USMC Post Office Building''.

    Approved December 18, 2014.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5331:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 160 (2014):
            Nov. 17, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 15, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
# C_2010221EN.01005401.xml

| 14.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/54

---

Action brought on 16 June 2010 — Spain v Commission

(Case T-266/10)

()

2010/C 221/86

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: Mrs Nuria Díaz Abdal, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the European Commission’s decision of 11 May 2010 declaring the suspension of the interim payment application submitted by Spain on 10 December 2009 on the grounds stated in Part I of the legal reasoning set out in the originating application; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the European Commission’s decision of 11 May 2010 declaring the suspension of the interim payment application submitted by Spain on 10 December 2009 on the grounds stated in Part I of the legal reasoning set out in the originating application;

| — | Uphold the claim that the European Commission should pay interest on account of the delay in the actual payment of the interim sums applied for and improperly suspended; |
| --- | --- |

—

Uphold the claim that the European Commission should pay interest on account of the delay in the actual payment of the interim sums applied for and improperly suspended;

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The present action is brought against the Commission’s decision to interrupt the payment deadline in respect of the interim payment application submitted by Spain on 10 December 2009. That interim payment application, for a total amount of EUR 6 509 540,26, relates to the Operational Programme for Community Assistance of the European Social Fund in the framework of the Objectives of Convergence for the Basque Country (CCI 2007ES052PO010).

The pleas in law and main arguments are the same as those already raised in Case T-263/10 Spain v Commission.

Spain

Commission

---
§ 83.21 Exemptions. ( a ) All personnel records are exempted from §§ 83.6(c), 83.12, 83.13, 83.14, and 83.15, relating to making an accounting of disclosures available to the data subject or his authorized representative and access to and amendment of the records and other sections relating to procedural requirements of the above-cited sections if the record is: ( 1 ) Specifically authorized under criteria established by an Executive order to be kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign policy and is in fact classified pursuant to such Executive order. *See* 31 U.S.C. 716(e)(1) and 718(b)(3) concerning the applicability of these requirements to GAO.
( 2 ) Investigatory material compiled for law enforcement purposes: *Provided, however,* That if any individual is denied any right, privilege, or benefit that he would otherwise be entitled to by Federal law, or for which he would otherwise be eligible, as a result of the maintenance of such material, such material shall be provided to such individual, except to the extent that the disclosure of such material would reveal the identity of a source who furnished information to the Government under an express promise that the identity of the source would be held in confidence, or, prior to the effective date of this section, under an express or implied promise that the identity of the source would be held in confidence;
( 3 ) Maintained in connection with providing protection services to the President of the United States or other individuals pursuant to section 3056 of Title 18, United States Code;
( 4 ) Required by statute to be maintained and used solely as statistical records;
( 5 ) Investigatory material compiled solely for the purposes of determining suitability, eligibility, or qualifications for Federal civilian employment, military service, Federal contracts, or access to classified information, but only to the extent that the disclosure of such material would reveal the identity of the source who furnished information to the Government under an express promise that the identity of the source would be held in confidence, or, prior to the effective date of this section, under an express or implied promise that the identity of the source would be held in confidence (*see* § 83.5(j)(1) for the procedure to be used to obtain investigative data originated by other Government agencies);
( 6 ) Testing or examination material used solely to determine individual qualifications for appointment or promotion in the Federal service the disclosure of which would compromise the objectivity or fairness of the testing or examination process; or
( 7 ) Evaluation material used to determine potential for promotion in the armed services, but only to the extent that the disclosure of such material would reveal the identity of a source who furnished information to the Government under an express promise that the identity of the source would be held in confidence, or, prior to the effective date of this section, under an express or implied promise that the identity of the source would be held in confidence.
§ 1308.3 Exclusions. ( a ) This part does not apply to any TVA contract which does not contain a disputes clause.
( b ) Except as otherwise specifically provided, this part does not apply to any TVA contract entered into prior to March 1, 1979, or to any dispute relating to such a contract.
§ 101.2 Candidate as agent of authorized committee (52 U.S.C. 30102(e)(2)). ( a ) Any candidate who receives a contribution as defined at 11 CFR part 100, subparts B and C obtains any loan, or makes any disbursement, in connection with his or her campaign shall be considered as having received such contribution, obtained such loan or made such disbursement as an agent of his or her authorized committee(s).
( b ) When an individual becomes a candidate, any funds received, loans obtained, or disbursements made prior to becoming a candidate in connection with his or her campaign shall be deemed to have been received, obtained or made as an agent of his or her authorized committee(s).
[45 FR 15103, Mar. 7, 1980, as amended at 67 FR 78680, Dec. 26, 2002]
#### § 381.166 Breaded products.

“Breaded” is a term applicable to any poultry product which is coated with breading or a batter and breading in an amount not to exceed 30 percent of the weight of the finished breaded product.
§ 590.950 Labeling of immediate containers of egg products offered for entry. ( a ) Immediate containers of product offered for entry into the United States must bear a label, printed in English, showing: ( 1 ) The name of the product;
( 2 ) The name of the country of origin of the product, and for consumer packaged products, preceded by the words “Product of,” which statement must appear immediately under the name of the product;
( 3 ) [Reserved];
( 4 ) The word “Ingredients” followed by a list of the ingredients in order of descending proportions by weight, if applicable,;
( 5 ) The name and place of business of the manufacturer, packer, or distributor, qualified by a phrase which reveals the connection that such person has with the product;
( 6 ) An accurate statement of the quantity;
( 7 ) The inspection mark of the country of origin;
( 8 ) The date of production and the plant number of the plant at which the egg products were processed or packed.
( b ) For properly sealed and certified shipments of shell eggs for breaking at an official plant, the immediate containers need not be labeled, provided that the shipment is segregated and controlled upon arrival at the destination breaking plant.
( c ) The labels must not be false or misleading in any respect.
§ 1304.205 Other water-use facilities. ( a ) A marine railway or concrete boat launching ramp with associated driveway may be located within the access corridor. Construction must occur during reservoir drawdown. Excavated material must be placed at an upland site. Use of concrete is allowable; asphalt is not permitted.
( b ) Tables or benches for cleaning fish are permitted on docks or piers.
( c ) All anchoring cables or spud poles must be anchored to the walkway or to the ground in a way that will not accelerate shoreline erosion. Anchoring of cables, chains, or poles to trees on TVA property is not permitted.
( d ) Electrical appliances such as stoves, refrigerators, freezers, and microwave ovens are not permitted on docks, piers, or boathouses.
( e ) Mooring buoys/posts may be permitted provided the following requirements are met. ( 1 ) Posts and buoys shall be placed in such a manner that in TVA's judgment they would not create a navigation hazard.
( 2 ) Mooring posts must be a minimum 48 inches in height above the full summer pool elevation of the reservoir or higher as required by TVA.
( 3 ) Buoys must conform to the Uniform State Waterway Marking system.
( f ) Structures shall not be wider than the width of the lot.
( g ) In congested areas, TVA may establish special permit conditions requiring dry-docking of floating structures when a reservoir reaches a specific drawdown elevation to prevent these structures from interfering with navigation traffic, recreational boating access, or adjacent structures during winter drawdown.
( h ) Closed loop heat exchanges for residential heat pump application may be approved provided they are installed five feet below minimum winter water elevation and they utilize propylene glycol or water. All land-based pipes must be buried within the access corridor.
#### § 83.20 Mailing lists.

An individual's name and address may not be sold or rented by GAO unless such action is specifically authorized by law. This provision shall not be construed to require the withholding of names and addresses otherwise permitted to be made public.
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-2665

___________ Andrea R. Brown, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Appeal from the United States City of Little Rock, Arkansas, and * District Court for the its agency Finance Department; * Eastern District of Arkansas. John Pryor, Director, in his official * capacity; Gary Davis, Accounting * [UNPUBLISHED] and Reporting Manager, in his * official capacity; Lynn Umholtz, * Supervisor, in her official capacity, * * Appellees.

___________ Submitted: April 22, 1998 Filed: April 24, 1998

___________ Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circui t Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.The Ho norable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for th e 1 Eastern District of Arkansas. -2- Andrea Brown appeals from the District Court’s grant of summary judgment for 1 de fendants in her employment discrimination action. After carefully reviewing th e rec ordand the parties’ submissions, we deny Brown’s motion for appointment o f counsel, a nd conclude the District Court did not commit error in granting summary judgment for the reasons it stated. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Editorial Note on Part 260
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations affecting forms listed in part 260, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 260.401 FERC Form No. 552, Annual Report of Natural Gas Transactions. ( a ) *Prescription.* The annual report for natural gas market participants, designated as FERC Form No. 552, is prescribed for the calendar year ending December 31, 2008 and each calendar year thereafter.
( b ) *Filing requirements* — ( 1 ) *Who must file.* Unless otherwise exempted or granted a waiver by Commission rule or order, each natural gas market participant, i.e., any buyer or seller that engaged in physical natural gas transactions the previous calendar year, must prepare and file with the Commission a FERC Form No. 552 pursuant to the definitions and general instructions set forth in that form. However a *de minimis* exemption, a natural gas market participant is exempt from this filing requirement if: ( i ) It engages in reportable physical natural gas sales that amount to less than 2,200,000 MMBtus for the previous calendar year; and
( ii ) It engages in reportable physical natural gas purchases that amount to less than 2,200,000 MMBtus for the previous calendar year.
( 2 ) Form No. 552 must be filed as prescribed in § 385.2011 of this chapter as indicated in the General Instructions set out in the annual reporting form, and must be properly completed and verified. Each market participant must file Form No. 552 by May 1, 2009 for calendar year 2008 and by May 1 of each year thereafter for the previous calendar year. Each report must be prepared in conformance with the Commission's software and guidance posted and available for downloading from the FERC Web site (*http://www.ferc.gov*). One copy of the report must be retained by the respondent in its files.
[73 FR 1031, Jan. 4, 2008, as amended at 73 FR 55739, Sept. 26, 2008; Order 704-C, 75 FR 35643, June 23, 2010]
Exhibit










Exhibit 10(p)




	
							
	 
	Non-Employee Director Compensation

	 
	December 2015

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	Board Member Fees:
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	Annual Retainer:
	 
	$
	60,000
	

	 

	 
	Annual Equity Award:
	 
	$
	90,000
	

	(1)(2)

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	$
	150,000
	

	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	Lead Director Fee:
	 
	$
	20,000
	

	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	Committee Chair Fees:
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	Audit
	 
	$
	15,000
	

	 

	 
	Compensation & Management Development
	 
	$
	15,000
	

	 

	 
	Nominating & Governance
	 
	$
	10,000
	

	 

	 
	Regulatory & Compliance
	 
	$
	15,000
	

	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	Meeting Fees:
	 
	$
	1,500
	

	(3)

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	(1)
	Target Value of restricted stock units on the date of annual grant
	 
	 
	 

	(2)
	100% of the number of shares in annual grant is awarded to a new director who joins the Board between January and June, and 50% of the number of shares is awarded if he or she joins Board between July and December
	 
	 
	 

	(3)
	For meetings attended in excess of 24 in a year