alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 201.17 Requirements for filing tariffs. ( a ) *Schedules of rate changes for stockyard services.* Each stockyard owner and market agency operating at a posted stockyard shall file with the Regional Director for the region in which they operate a signed copy of all schedules of rates and charges, supplements and amendments thereto. The schedules, supplements and amendments must be conspicuously posted for public inspection at the stockyard, and filed with the Regional Director, at least 10 days before their effective dates, except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section. Each schedule, supplement and amendment shall set forth its effective date, a description of the stockyard services rendered, the stockyard at which it applies, the name and address of the stockyard owner or market agency, the kind of livestock covered by it, and any rules or regulations which affect any rate or charge contained therein. Each schedule of rates and charges filed shall be designated by successive numbers. Each supplement and amendment to such schedule shall be numbered and shall designate the number of the schedule which it supplements or amends.
( b ) *Feed charges.* When the schedule in effect provides for feed charges to be based on an average cost plus a specified margin, the 10-day filing and notice provision contained in section 306(c) of the Act is waived. A schedule of the current feed charges based on average feed cost and showing the effective date shall be conspicuously posted at the stockyard at all times. Changes in feed charges may become effective 2 days after the change is posted at the stockyard.
( c ) *Professional veterinary services.* The 10-day filing and notice provision contained in section 306(a) of the Act is waived for a schedule of charges for professional veterinary services. A schedule of charges for professional veterinary services rendered by a veterinarian at a posted stockyard shall be conspicuously posted at the stockyard at all times. The schedule of charges and any supplement or amendment thereto may become effective 2 days after the schedule, supplement, or amendment is posted at the stockyard.
( d ) *Joint schedules.* If the same schedule is to be observed by more than one market agency operating at any one stockyard, one schedule will suffice for such market agencies. The names and business addresses of those market agencies adhering to such schedule must appear on the schedule.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0580-0015) (7 U.S.C. 203, 204, 207, 217a, 222 and 228)
[49 FR 33003, Aug. 20, 1984, as amended at 68 FR 75388, Dec. 31, 2003; 88 FR 62695, Sept. 13, 2023]
J 

reg on 

John A Kitzhaber, MD, Governor 

Department of Environmental Quality 

Headquarters 

811 SW Sixth Avenue 

Portland, OR 97204-1390 

(503) 229-5696 

FAX (503) 229-6124 

TIY711 

June 26, 2012 

Michael A. Bussell 

United States Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Water & Watersheds- Section 10 

1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900 

Seattle, WA 98101-3140 

Re: Vessel General Permit (VGP) and Small Vessel General Permit (sVGP) 

Request for Clean Water Act (CWA) section 401 Certification 

Dear Mr. Bussell: 

On December 15, 2011, EPA asked Oregon DEQ to make a written determination regarding 

certification under CW A Section 401 for proposed reissuance' s of the two EPA general permits 

covering incidental vessel discharges. DEQ regrets that it will not be able to make such a 

determination. Under Oregon's statutes and the Environmental Quality Commission's 

Administrative Rules, a formal application, including the payment of fees, is required for DEQ to 

issue a Section 401 certification. ORS 468B.047; OAR 340-048-0020; OAR 340-048-0055. In 

this instance the application and fee requirements were not met and DEQ does not have the legal 

authority to waive these requirements. 

DEQ recognizes that EPA intends to deem certification as being waived based on DEQ's 

inability to respond within six months. While DEQ does not have authority under state law to 

affirmatively waive certification requirements imposed under CWA Section 401, DEQ does not 

intend to challenge EPA's decision to deem that a waiver has occurred. 

While D EQ is not able to certify EPA's permits under these circumstances, D EQ staff did 

provide a number of comments on the proposed permits during EPA's formal public 

participation process. DEQ appreciates EPA's willingness to consider the important concerns 

that were raised in these comments. 

Sincerely, 

~7:74 I( U1cf~Ll Greg Aldftclf 

Water Quality Division Administrator 

cc: Nina DeConcini, DEQ 

Steve Mra.Zik, DEQ 

Jlma Rickner, DLCD 

Cindi Godsey, EPA
###### Editorial Note on Part 260

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations affecting forms listed in part 260, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*

#### §§ 260.11-260.15 [Reserved]
Exhibit 23.3




            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the inclusion in the Motient Corporation Form 10 K for the period
ended December 31, 2003 of our reports dated January 23, 2002, with respect to
the consolidated balance sheets of XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc. and
subsidiaries and XM Satellite Radio Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31,
2000 and 2001 and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2001.

Our reports dated January 23, 2002 contain an explanatory paragraph that states
that XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc. and subsidiaries and XM Satellite Radio
Inc. are dependent upon additional debt or equity financing, which raises
substantial doubt about their ability to continue as going concerns. The
consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might
result from the outcome of that uncertainty.



/s/ KPMG LLP

McLean, VA
May 20, 2005
# C_2013026EN.01000501.xml

| 26.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 6 December 2012 (references for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht — Germany) — Bundesrepublik Deutschland v Karen Dittrich (C-124/11), Bundesrepublik Deutschland v Robert Klinke (C-125/11) and Jörg-Detlef Müller v Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-143/11)

(Joined Cases C-124/11, C-125/11 and C-143/11) (1)

1

(Equal treatment in employment and occupation - National rules - Assistance granted to public servants in the event of illness - Directive 2000/78/EC - Article 3 - Scope - Concept of ‘pay’)

2013/C 26/08

Language of the cases: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesverwaltungsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-124/11 and C-125/11), Jörg-Detlef Müller (C-143/11)

Applicants:

Defendants: Karen Dittrich (C-124/11), Robert Klinke (C-125/11), Bundesrepublik Deutschland (C-143/11)

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

References for a preliminary ruling — Bundesverwaltungsgericht — Interpretation of Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation (OJ 2000 L 303, p. 16) — National legislation providing for assistance paid to public servants in case of illness excluding life partners from the members of the family who can be covered by the assistance in question — Equal treatment of workers in a registered partnership and married workers — Scope of Directive 2000/78/EC — Concept of remuneration

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 3(1)(c) and 3(3) of Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation must be interpreted as meaning that assistance granted to public servants in the event of illness, such as that granted to public servants of the Bundesrepublik Deutschland under the Law on federal public servants (Bundesbeamtengesetz), falls within the scope of that directive if it is the responsibility of the State, as a public employer, to finance it, this being a matter for the national court to determine.

---

(1)  OJ C 269, 10.09.2011.

1

---
§ 366.5 Allocation of costs for non-power goods and services. ( a ) *Commission review.* In the case of non-power goods or administrative or management services provided by an associate company organized specifically for the purpose of providing such goods or services to any public utility in the same holding company system, at the election of that holding company system or a state commission having jurisdiction over the public utility, the Commission shall review and authorize the allocation of the costs for such goods or services to the extent relevant to that associate company. Such election to have the Commission review and authorize cost allocations shall remain in effect until further Commission order.
( b ) *Exemptions.* Paragraph (a) of this section shall not apply to any holding company system whose public utility operations are confined substantially to a single state. For purposes of this section, a holding company system will be deemed to have its public utility operations confined substantially to a single state if the holding company system derives no more than 13 percent of its public utility revenues from outside a single state. A holding company system or state commission may, pursuant to this subsection, seek a Commission determination that a holding company's public utility operations are confined substantially to a single state by filing a petition for declaratory order pursuant to § 385.207(a) of this chapter. Any holding company system or state commission seeking such a determination shall bear the burden of demonstrating that such determination is warranted.
( c ) *Other classes of transactions.* Either upon petition for declaratory order or upon its own motion, the Commission may exclude from the scope of Commission review and authorization under paragraph (a) of this section any class of transactions that the Commission finds is not relevant to the jurisdictional rates of a public utility. Any holding company system or state commission seeking to obtain such a determination under this subsection shall file a petition for declaratory order pursuant to § 385.207(a) of this chapter. Any holding company system or state commission seeking such an exemption shall bear the burden of demonstrating that such an exemption is warranted.
( d ) Nothing in paragraphs (a)-(c) of this section shall affect the authority of the Commission under the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 791 *et seq.*), the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717 *et seq.*), or other applicable law, including the authority of the Commission with respect to rates, charges, classifications, rules, regulations, practices, contracts, facilities, and services under the Federal Power Act and Natural Gas Act, and with respect to access to books and records under the Federal Power Act and Natural Gas Act.
### §2212. Fire safety effectiveness statements

The Administrator is authorized to encourage owners and managers of residential multiple-unit, commercial, industrial, and transportation structures to prepare Fire Safety Effectiveness Statements, pursuant to standards, forms, rules, and regulations to be developed and issued by the Administrator.

(Pub. L. 93–498, §13, Oct. 29, 1974, 88 Stat. 1544.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of all functions, personnel, assets, components, authorities, grant programs, and liabilities of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, including the functions of the Under Secretary for Federal Emergency Management relating thereto, to the Federal Emergency Management Agency, see section 315(a)(1) of Title 6, Domestic Security.

For transfer of functions, personnel, assets, and liabilities of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, including the functions of the Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency relating thereto, to the Secretary of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see former section 313(1) and sections 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions of National Fire Prevention and Control Administration [now United States Fire Administration] and National Academy for Fire Prevention and Control generally transferred to Federal Emergency Management Agency. For further details see Transfer of Functions note set out under section 2202 of this title.
# C_2013225EN.01000702.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 June 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Piepenbrock Dienstleistungen GmbH & Co. KG v Kreis Düren

(Case C-386/11) (1)

1

(Public contracts - Directive 2004/18/EC - Definition of ‘public contract’ - Article 1(2)(a) - Contract concluded between two local authorities - Transfer by one entity of the responsibility for cleaning certain of its buildings to another entity in return for financial compensation)

2013/C 225/11

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Piepenbrock Dienstleistungen GmbH & Co. KG

Appellant:

Respondent: Kreis Düren

Respondent:

Intervening party: Stadt Düren

Intervening party:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf — Interpretation of Article 1(2)(a) of Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts (OJ 2004 L 134, p. 114) — Agreement under which, in return for the reimbursement of costs incurred, a regional authority transfers responsibility for the cleaning of the public buildings which it owns to the local authority responsible for the area in which the buildings are situated — Classification of that agreement as a public service contract or as an agreement on cooperation between local authorities that is not subject to the European Union rules on public procurement

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

A contract such as that at issue in the main proceedings — whereby, without establishing cooperation between the contracting public entities with a view to carrying out a public service task that both of them have to perform, one public entity assigns to another the task of cleaning certain office, administrative and school buildings, while reserving the power to supervise the proper execution of that task, in return for financial compensation intended to correspond to the costs incurred in the performance of the task, the second entity being, moreover, authorised to avail of the services of third parties which might be capable of competing on the market for the accomplishment of that task — constitutes a public service contract within the meaning of Article 1(2)(d) of Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts.

---

(1)  OJ C 311, 22.10.2011.

1

---
### §616a. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 616a, acts Mar. 26, 1934, ch. 90, 48 Stat. 500; June 29, 1936, ch. 858, title II, §204, 49 Stat. 1987, which related to the shipment of exports financed by the Government in United States vessels, was transferred to section 1241–1 of Title 46, Appendix, Shipping, and was subsequently repealed and restated as section 55304 of Title 46, Shipping, by Pub. L. 109–304, §§8(c), 19, Oct. 6, 2006, 120 Stat. 1586, 1710.
----

| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  March 9, 2016 | CRESCENT POINT ENERGY CORP.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
|----------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|                       |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|                       |  /s/ Scott Saxberg                                                 |
|                       | Name:  Scott Saxberg                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
|                       | Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |

----
### §3210. Prior and pending proceedings

For purposes of this chapter, proceedings commenced by any State regulatory authority (with respect to gas utilities for which it has ratemaking authority) and any nonregulated gas utility before November 9, 1978, and actions taken before such date in such proceedings shall be treated as complying with the requirements of this chapter if such proceedings and actions substantially conform to such requirements. For purposes of this chapter, any such proceeding or action commenced before November 9, 1978, but not completed before such date shall comply with the requirements of this chapter, to the maximum extent practicable, with respect to so much of such proceeding or action as takes place after such date.

(Pub. L. 95–617, title III, §310, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3154.)
#### § 1b.4 Types of investigations.

Investigations may be formal or preliminary, and public or private.
### §71. "Person" defined

When used in this subchapter the term "person" includes partnerships, corporations, and associations.

(Sept. 8, 1916, ch. 463, title VIII, §800, 39 Stat. 798.)
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of CellStar Corporation (the Registrant) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, in the capacity as indicated below and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Terry S.
Parker

Terry S. Parker, Chief Executive Officer

Date: February 25, 2004
#### § 418.4 Records.

All records, including records documenting procedures required by this part, must be available for official review and copying.
§ 51.29 Destruction of animals; time limit. ( a ) The claimant must ensure that goats, sheep, and horses infected with or exposed to *B. abortus* are either: ( 1 ) Sold under permit to a recognized slaughtering establishment;
( 2 ) Moved to an approved stockyard for sale to a recognized slaughtering establishment; or
( 3 ) Destroyed and buried, incinerated, or rendered in accordance with applicable State law.
( b ) The claimant must ensure that goats and sheep destroyed because of *B. melitensis* are destroyed and buried, incinerated, or rendered in accordance with applicable State law.
( c ) Indemnity will be paid under this part only if the animals are destroyed within 15 days after the date they are marked with identification showing they are to be destroyed. However, the Veterinarian in Charge may extend the time limit to 30 days if: ( 1 ) The animals' owner asks the Veterinarian in Charge for an extension before the initial 15-day period expires, or the animals were sold for slaughter before the original 15-day period expires; and
( 2 ) The Veterinarian in Charge determines that extending the time limit will not adversely affect the Brucellosis Eradication Program.
( d ) The Administrator may extend the time limit beyond 30 days when unusual and unforeseen circumstances occur that prevent or hinder the destruction of the animals within 30 days, such as, but not limited to, floods, storms, or other Acts of God, which are beyond the control of the owner, or when destruction is delayed due to requirements of another Federal agency.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0185)
#### JESUS T. SIONGCO, et al., Plaintiffs v. GUAM DEVELOPMENT AND INVESTMENT CORPORATION, et al., Defendants

Civil No. 343-74

Superior Court of Guam

October 26, 1976

*Counsel for Plaintiff:*J. C. Dierking

*Counsel for Inland Builders, Inc. and Commercial Insurance of Newark, New Jersey:*Crain & Shoecraft

*Co-Counsel for Inland'i Builders and Eulogio Del Carmeo:*Fred Bordallo

*Representing Government of Guam:*Cyril E. Morrison

BENSON, *Judge*

ORDER

IN ORDER that the trial proceed in an orderly manner,

IT IS ORDERED:

1. That the parties present for marking every exhibit that they intend to offer in evidence at 3:30 p.m., December 17,1976.

2. That at the time and date stated above the parties will exchange lists of every witness each intends to call together with a concise statement of the expected testimony of each witness.

No exhibit not marked and no witness not listed as required by this order shall be offered or called at the trial, except for good cause shown. (Jury trial remains December 21, 1976 at 9:30 a.m.).