alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements of The Smithfield Companies,
Inc. for the nine months ended December 31, 2000, and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                       7,244,550
<SECURITIES>                                 1,305,825
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,710,207
<ALLOWANCES>                                    87,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,246,508
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,331,590
<PP&E>                                       9,730,452
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,397,598
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,495,102
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,422,621
<BONDS>                                      2,800,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       920,822
<OTHER-SE>                                  14,351,659
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,495,102
<SALES>                                     17,156,691
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,189,461
<CGS>                                       11,452,443
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               16,176,223
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             121,761
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,281,690
<INCOME-TAX>                                   395,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            886,690
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    886690
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .41


</TABLE>
Martin, Michael (OST) 

From: Frank Bern is [fbemis@bemisrossignol.com] > --np'TATirv 

Sent: IVIonday, January 23, 2012 4:39 PM ;^^y',.^^!^L'^;' ^ 

To: EAS(OST) .v: i'J^r:nAl iUrib 

Cc: scottw@flypresqueisle.com 

Subject: Northern Maine Regional Airport VA] f^R -9 A in.cc; 

Dear Sir/Madam, 

I am writing in support of the airport in Presque Isle. I use the airport regularly for personal trips. In the last two years, 

my wife and I flew to California, Las Vegas, Boston, New York and Washington, DC. The key issues for our use of the 

airport are fares and connections (including terminal connections). If the fare is at all competitive with other airports 

and we then we will always use PQI. To our family, it doesn't matter whether Boston or the New York area is the 

terminal of choice for flights out of Presque isle. 

From my personal experience and from my service on the Presque Isle Industrial Council and the Loring Development 

Authority I can attest that the Northern Maine Regional Airport is an economic lifeline to the people of Presque Isle and 

all of Aroostook County. Anything that can be done to retain or improve service to this area will be greatly appreciated. 

Francis E. Bemis, Esq. 

Bemis & Rossignol, LLC 

454 Main Street 

Presque Isle, ME 04769 

(207)764-2910 office 

(207)764-4532 fax 

PRIVILESE AND CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE 

This information in this e-mail Is intended for the addressed recipient ONLY. This e-mail contains 

privileged and confidential material. I f you have received this e-mail In error, please notify the sender 

immediate by replying to this e-mail or by telephone. Please DO NOT disclose the contents of this emall to anyone. Thank you.
### §2504. Coordination between Secretary of Energy and other agencies

#### (a) Consultation with Secretary of Transportation

In carrying out the project established under section 2503 of this title, the Secretary of Energy shall, to the maximum extent practicable, consult and coordinate with the Secretary of Transportation, with respect to any functions of the Secretary of Energy under this chapter which relate to regulatory activities or other responsibilities of the Secretary of Transportation, including safety and damageability programs.

#### (b) Assistance from other agencies

Each department, agency, and instrumentality of the executive branch of the Federal Government shall carefully consider any written request from the Secretary of Energy, or the head of any agency to which the Secretary of Energy has delegated responsibility for specified parts or aspects of the project, to furnish such assistance, on a reimbursable basis, as the Secretary of Energy or such head deems necessary to carry out the project and to achieve the purposes of this chapter. Such assistance may include transfer of personnel with their consent and without prejudice to their position and rating.

(Pub. L. 94–413, §5, Sept. 17, 1976, 90 Stat. 1262; Pub. L. 95–91, title III, §301(a), Aug. 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 577.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

In subsec. (a), "Secretary of Transportation" substituted for "Secretary" for clarity, see Codification note set out under section 2502 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

"Secretary of Energy" substituted in text for "Administrator" pursuant to section 301(a) of Pub. L. 95–91, see Codification note set out under section 2502 of this title.
Exhibit


 





EXHIBIT 10.8
AMENDMENT TO THE  
ZIONS BANCORPORATION 
FOURTH RESTATED DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN FOR DIRECTORS


WHEREAS, Zions Bancorporation (the “Company”) adopted the Zions Bancorporation Fourth Restated Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors, effective as of January 1, 2005 (the “Plan”);
WHEREAS, Section 8.2 of the Plan provides that the Committee (as defined in the Plan) may amend the Plan in whole or in part at any time, except in certain respects not material hereto; and
WHEREAS, the Committee desires to amend the Plan to provide that advisory board members of the Company and any of its affiliates shall be eligible to participate in the Plan.
NOW THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows, effective as of January 1, 2016:
1.    The first sentence of Section 1.2 is amended in its entirety to read as follows: 
“Zions Bancorporation has established this Plan to provide members of the Board of Directors of Zions Bancorporation and the members of other Boards the opportunity to elect to defer the receipt of Compensation paid to them by the Company or any Company affiliate in accordance with the terms of the Plan until such time as they are entitled to receive such Compensation under the provisions of this Plan.”
2.    Section 2.2 is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
“Board means the Board of Directors of the Company, the board of directors of a participating affiliate or subsidiary of the Company, or an advisory board of directors constituted from time to time by the Board of Directors of the Company or the Board of Directors of a participating affiliate or subsidiary of the Company; provided, however, that for purposes of Section 8.2 of the Plan, “Board” shall refer to the Board of Directors of the Company.”
3.    Section 2.6 is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
“Compensation means the remuneration paid to a Director for the services provided by the Director to the Company in the capacity as a member of the Board or as a consultant to the Company or any of its affiliates, including remuneration for services on any sub-committee or division of the Board, but excluding (i) any amount paid solely to reimburse the Director for expenses 









incurred, and (ii) any amounts credited as earnings under this Plan. Deferral elections under this Plan shall be computed on the amount of the Director’s Compensation.”
4.    Section 2.9 is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
“Director means a member of a Board.”
5.     Section 2.17 is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
“Plan means the Zions Bancorporation Fourth Restated Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors, as set forth in this document, and as further amended from time to time.”
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Committee has caused this amendment to be adopted and authorized its execution by a duly appointed officer of Zions Bancorporation, to be effective as of January 1, 2016.  


/s/ Rena A. Miller______________
By:  Rena A. Miller
Title:  Assistant Secretary
#### § 55.2 Payment of indemnity.

The Administrator is authorized to pay for the purchase and destruction of CWD positive animals, CWD exposed animals, and CWD suspect animals. Subject to available funding, the amount of the Federal payment for any such animals will be 95 percent of the appraised value established in accordance with § 55.3 of this part, but the Federal payment shall not exceed $3,000 per animal. If a non-Federal source makes a payment for an animal for which a Federal indemnity is paid, and the non-Federal payment exceeds 5 percent of the appraised value established in accordance with § 55.3 of this part, the amount of the Federal payment for any such animals will be reduced by the amount by which the non-Federal payment exceeds 5 percent of the appraised value. The Administrator is also authorized to reimburse State governments or State animal health agencies for payments they make for the purchase and destruction, on or after October 1, 2001, of CWD positive animals, CWD exposed animals, and CWD suspect animals, and for State expenditures for associated carcass disposal and cleaning and disinfection costs resulting from such purchase and destruction, in accordance with cooperative agreements signed by the Administrator and the duly authorized agent of the State.
#### §§ 381.141-381.143 [Reserved]
#### § 5.6 Allowances.

The provisions of chapter 59 of title 5, U.S. Code and the implementing regulations for the Executive Branch apply to Government Accountability Office employees.
# C_2012109EN.01000805.xml

| 14.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 109/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 109/8

---

Order of the President of the Court of 31 January 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Oldenburg — Germany) — Johann Bilker, Heidrun Ohle, Ursula Kohls-Ohle v EWE AG

(Case C-8/11) (1)

1

2012/C 109/18

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 113, 9.4.2011.

1

---
Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-63699, No. 333-67535, No. 333-89551, No. 333-89505, No. 333-35996 and No. 333-125881) and Form S-3 (No. 333-156944, No. 333-100701, No. 333-60877 and No. 333-30497)
of C&F Financial Corporation and Subsidiary of our report, dated March 2, 2009, relating to the audits of the consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, included in and incorporated by reference in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of C&F Financial Corporation and Subsidiary for the year ended December 31, 2008.



|                               
|-------------------------------
|/s/ Yount, Hyde & Barbour, P.C.
|                               
|Winchester, Virginia           
|March 9, 2009
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 60 

To withdraw certain National Forest System land in the Emigrant Crevice 

area located in the Custer Gallatin National Forest, Park County, Montana, from the mining and mineral leasing laws of the United States, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 9, 2019 

Mr. TESTER (for himself and Mr. DAINES) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

A BILL 

To withdraw certain National Forest System land in the 

Emigrant Crevice area located in the Custer Gallatin 

National Forest, Park County, Montana, from the mining and mineral leasing laws of the United States, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Yellowstone Gateway 

5 Protection Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 60 IS

1 SEC. 2. WITHDRAWAL. 

2 (a) DEFINITION OF MAP.—In this section, the term 

3 ‘‘map’’ means the map entitled ‘‘Emigrant Crevice Pro4 posed Withdrawal Area’’ and dated November 10, 2016. 

5 (b) WITHDRAWAL.—Subject to valid existing rights 

6 in existence on the date of enactment of this Act, the Na7 tional Forest System land and interests in the National 

8 Forest System land, as depicted on the map, is withdrawn 

9 from— 

10 (1) location, entry, and patent under the mining 

11 laws; and 

12 (2) disposition under all laws pertaining to min13 eral and geothermal leasing. 

14 (c) ACQUIRED LAND.—Any land or interest in land 

15 within the area depicted on the map that is acquired by 

16 the United States after the date of enactment of this Act 

17 shall, on acquisition, be immediately withdrawn in accord18 ance with this section. 

19 (d) MAP.— 

20 (1) SUBMISSION OF MAP.—As soon as prac21 ticable after the date of enactment of this Act, the 

22 Secretary of Agriculture shall file the map with— 

23 (A) the Committee on Energy and Natural 

24 Resources of the Senate; and 

25 (B) the Committee on Natural Resources 

26 of the House of Representatives. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 60 IS

1 (2) FORCE OF LAW.—The map filed under 

2 paragraph (1) shall have the same force and effect 

3 as if included in this Act, except that the Secretary 

4 of Agriculture may correct clerical and typographical 

5 errors in the map. 

6 (3) PUBLIC AVAILABILITY.—The map filed 

7 under paragraph (1) shall be on file and available 

8 for public inspection in the appropriate offices of the 

9 Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Manage10 ment. 

11 (e) EFFECT.—Nothing in this section affects any rec12 reational use, including hunting or fishing, that is author13 ized on land within the area depicted on the map under 

14 applicable law as of the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
# C_2013009EN.01002402.xml

| 12.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 9/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/24

---

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 18 September 2012 — Omnicare Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Astellas Pharma GmbH

(Case C-587/11 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Application for registration of the word sign ‘OMNICARE CLINICAL RESEARCH’ - Opposition - Decision of the Board of Appeal rejecting the application - Action - Judgment of the General Court dismissing that action - Withdrawal of the opposition - Appeal - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 9/40

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Omnicare Inc. (represented by: M. Edenborough, QC)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent), Astellas Pharma GmbH (represented by: M.L. Polo Carreño, abogada)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 9 September 2011 in Case T-289/09 Omnicare v OHIM — Astellas Pharma (OMNICARE CLINICAL RESEARCH), in which the General Court dismissed an action, brought by the applicant for the word mark ‘OMNICARE CLINICAL RESEARCH’ for services in Class 42, for the annulment of Decision R 401/2008-4 of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 14 May 2009 annulling the Opposition Division’s decision rejecting the opposition brought by the proprietor of the national mark ‘OMNICARE’ for services in Classes 35, 41 and 42 — Interpretation and application of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Concept of genuine use of an earlier mark — Mark used for services provided free of charge

Omnicare

OHIM — Astellas Pharma (OMNICARE CLINICAL RESEARCH)

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no need to adjudicate on the appeal brought by Omnicare Inc. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no need to adjudicate on the appeal brought by Omnicare Inc.

| 2. | Omnicare Inc. shall pay the costs incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) in the course of the present proceedings and the proceedings for interim measures. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Omnicare Inc. shall pay the costs incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) in the course of the present proceedings and the proceedings for interim measures.

| 3. | Omnicare Inc. and Astellas Pharma GmbH shall each bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Omnicare Inc. and Astellas Pharma GmbH shall each bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 25, 28.1.2012.

1

---
§ 292.307 System emergencies. ( a ) *Qualifying facility obligation to provide power during system emergencies.* A qualifying facility shall be required to provide energy or capacity to an electric utility during a system emergency only to the extent: ( 1 ) Provided by agreement between such qualifying facility and electric utility; or
( 2 ) Ordered under section 202(c) of the Federal Power Act.
( b ) *Discontinuance of purchases and sales during system emergencies.* During any system emergency, an electric utility may discontinue: ( 1 ) Purchases from a qualifying facility if such purchases would contribute to such emergency; and
( 2 ) Sales to a qualifying facility, provided that such discontinuance is on a nondiscriminatory basis.
#### § 34.9 Reports.

The applicant must file reports under § 131.43 and § 131.50 of this chapter no later than 30 days after the sale or placement of long-term debt or equity securities or the entry into guarantees or assumptions of liabilities pursuant to authority granted under this part.

[Order 575, 60 FR 4853, Jan. 25, 1995. Redesignated by Order 737, 75 FR 43403, July 26, 2010]

###### Effective Date Note

#### Effective Date Note:

At 70 FR 35375, June 20, 2005, § 34.9 was revised, effective at the time of the next e-filing release during the Commission's next fiscal year. For the convenience of the user, the revised text follows:

#### § 34.9 Filing fee.

Each application shall be accompanied by the submission of a filing fee if one is prescribed in part 381 of this chapter.
Exhibit 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of SUNBURST ACQUISITIONS V, INC.
(the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending January 31, 2004, (the "Report"), I, Jay
Lutsky, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)	The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the Company's financial position and results of
operations.


July 28, 2005

	/s/ Jay Lutsky
	Chief Executive Officer and
	Chief Financial and
	Accounting Officer
# C_2014078EN.01001002.xml

| 15.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 78/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78/10

---

Order of the General Court of 23 January 2014 — Confederación de Cooperativas Agrarias de España and CEPES v Commission

(Case T-156/10) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - State aid - Spanish legislation laying down measures in favour of agricultural cooperatives following the fuel price increase - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market - Professional associations - Lack of individual concern - No recovery - No longer any interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility)

2014/C 78/20

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Confederación de Cooperativas Agrarias de España (Madrid, Spain), and Confederación Empresarial Española de la Economía Social (CEPES) (Madrid) (represented by: M. Araujo Boyd and M. Muñoz de Juan, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal and C. Urraca Caviedes, agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Asociación de Empresarios de Estaciones de Servicio de la Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid (Aeescam) (represented by: R. Ortega Bueno and M. Delgado Echevarría, lawyers)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application to annul Commission decision 2010/473/EU of 15 December 2009 relating to measures to support agriculture implemented by Spain following the fuel price increase (OJ 2010 L 235, p.1).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | The Confederación de Cooperativas Agrarias de España and the Confederación Empresarial Española de la Economía Social (CEPES) shall bear their own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Confederación de Cooperativas Agrarias de España and the Confederación Empresarial Española de la Economía Social (CEPES) shall bear their own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

| 3. | The Asociación de Empresarios de Estaciones de Servicio de la Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid (Aeescam) shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Asociación de Empresarios de Estaciones de Servicio de la Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid (Aeescam) shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 148, 5.6.2010.

1

---
### §6608. Duty to mitigate

#### (a) In general

Damages awarded in any Y2K action shall exclude compensation for damages the plaintiff could reasonably have avoided in light of any disclosure or other information of which the plaintiff was, or reasonably should have been, aware, including information made available by the defendant to purchasers or users of the defendant's product or services concerning means of remedying or avoiding the Y2K failure involved in the action.

#### (b) Preservation of existing law

The duty imposed by this section is in addition to any duty to mitigate imposed by State law.

#### (c) Exception for intentional fraud

Subsection (a) does not apply to damages suffered by reason of the plaintiff's justifiable reliance upon an affirmative material misrepresentation by the defendant, made by the defendant with actual knowledge of its falsity, concerning the potential for Y2K failure of the device or system used or sold by the defendant that experienced the Y2K failure alleged to have caused the plaintiff's harm.

(Pub. L. 106–37, §9, July 20, 1999, 113 Stat. 198.)