alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §687d. Conflicts of interest

For the purpose of controlling conflicts of interest which may be detrimental to small business concerns, to small business investment companies, to the shareholders, partners, or members of either, or to the purposes of this chapter, the Administration shall adopt regulations to govern transactions with any officer, director, shareholder, partner, or member of any small business investment company, or with any person or concern, in which any interest, direct or indirect, financial or otherwise, is held by any officer, director, shareholder, partner, or member of (1) any small business investment company, or (2) any person or concern with an interest, direct or indirect, financial or otherwise, in any small business investment company. Such regulations shall include appropriate requirements for public disclosure necessary to the purposes of this section.

(Pub. L. 85–699, title III, §312, as added Pub. L. 88–273, §6(a), Feb. 28, 1964, 78 Stat. 147; amended Pub. L. 94–305, title I, §106(f), June 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 666; Pub. L. 104–208, div. D, title II, §208(h)(1)(D), Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–747; Pub. L. 107–100, §3, Dec. 21, 2001, 115 Stat. 966.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

For definition of "this chapter", referred to in text, see References in Text note set out under section 661 of this title.

#### Amendments

2001—Pub. L. 107–100 struck out "(including disclosure in the locality most directly affected by the transaction)" after "public disclosure".

1996—Pub. L. 104–208, §208(h)(1)(D), substituted "shareholders, partners, or members" for "shareholders or partners" and substituted "shareholder, partner, or member" for "shareholder, or partner" in two places.

1976—Pub. L. 94–305, §106(f)(2), which directed the substitution of "shareholder, or partner" for "or shareholders" wherever appearing, was executed by making the substitution for "or shareholder" in two places to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

Pub. L. 94–305, §106(f)(1), inserted "or partners" after "to the shareholders".
On November 9, 2015 Captain Earl D. Gibbs, President and CEO of Gryphon Holdings, LLC, (dba: Gryphon 

Air) submitted a petition for exemption (FAA-2015-5943-0001) which requested permission for Gryphon 

Air to operator to four cities (Baghdad, Basrah, Erbil and Sulaymaniyah) in Iraq. On February 4, 2016, 

Gryphon Air filed docket amendment FAA-2015-5943-0003 which named four additional cities (Balad, 

Najaf, Taji, and Tallil) in Iraq, to which Gryphon Air sought approval for operations. On February 5, 2015 

Gryphon submitted docket amendment FAA-2015-5943-0004 which listed only Balad, Taji and Tallil as 

the cities to be added to the original petition for exemption - excluding the city of Najaf which had been 

listed the previous day. Inspector Filippell contacted Captain Gibbs for clarification. Captain Gibbs 

advised Inspector Filippell that Najaf should be considered, along with the other seven cities, in this 

petition for exemption and that another amendment to this docket would be forthcoming to correct this 

error.

On February 10, 2016 Captain Earl D. Gibbs, informed Inspector Filippell, that the US Department of 

State Overseas Security Advisory Council (OSAC) had granted membership to Gryphon Air and that 

Gryphon Air was receiving daily security notices for the areas in which they operate. Captain Gibbs also 

noted that Gryphon Air had since applied for membership to the Department of State’s Aviation Security 

Working Group.
### §§5631 to 5633. Repealed. Pub. L. 111–314, §6, Dec. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 3444

Section 5631, Pub. L. 102–555, title III, §301, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4174, related to continued Federal research and development. See section 60131 of Title 51, National and Commercial Space Programs.

Section 5632, Pub. L. 102–555, title III, §302, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4174, related to availability of federally gathered unenhanced data. See section 60132 of Title 51.

Section 5633, Pub. L. 102–555, title III, §303, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4174, related to technology demonstration program. See section 60133 of Title 51.
#### § 73.3 Shipment for purposes other than slaughter; conditions under which permitted.

Cattle affected with scabies may be shipped interstate for any purpose if dipped twice in a permitted dip, 10 to 14 days apart, under the supervision of an APHIS inspector or State inspector, and so certified by such inspector, or such cattle may be so shipped if dipped once in a permitted dip under APHIS supervision or State supervision at the point of origin, provided arrangements have been made for the second dipping, under APHIS supervision, en route or at destination within 10 to 14 days after the first dipping. If shipped in the latter manner the means of conveyance containing the cattle shall be placarded and the billing shall be marked “Treated Scabby Cattle,” in accordance with § 73.6.

[28 FR 5945, June 13, 1963, as amended at 41 FR 5384, Feb. 6, 1976; 49 FR 10530, Mar. 20, 1984; 49 FR 33120, Aug. 21, 1984; 56 FR 52463, Oct. 21, 1991; 66 FR 21062, Apr. 27, 2001]
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Fifth Circuit**

No. 20-40007 Summary Calendar

Curtis Lee Sheppard, Jr.,
Plaintiff—Appellant ,

versus
Kempt, Assistant Warden ; Watson, Law Library Clerk ; C. Martinez, Step 2 Coordinator ; M. Price, Investigator III ; V. Matlock, Investigator II ; S. Smith, Law Library Supervisor , Defendants—Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:19-CV-567

Before Willet, Ho, and Duncan, Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam: * Curtis Lee Sheppard, Jr., Texas pr isoner # 1656666, moves this court for authorization to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) following the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint pursuant to the three

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 2, 2021 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-40007 Document: 00515806471 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/02/2021No. 20-40007

2 strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Because he has failed to show that he should be allowed to proceed IFP on appeal under § 1915(g), see Banos v. O’Guin , 144 F.3d 883, 885 (5th Cir. 1998 ), Sheppard’s motion for leave to proceed IFP is denied. The facts surrounding the IFP decisi on are inextricably intertwined with the merits of the appeal. See Baugh v. Taylor , 117 F.3d 197, 202 & n.24 (5th Cir. 1997). The appeal presents no nonfrivolous issues and is dismissed as frivolous. 5th Cir. R . 42.2. MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED

. Case: 20-40007 Document: 00515806471 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/02/2021
### §4807. Annual report

#### (a) Submission of report

The Council shall annually on March 1 submit to the President, the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee, and the appropriate Committees of the House of Representatives and the Senate a report setting forth—

(1) the goals to achieve a more competitive United States economy;

(2) the policies needed to meet such goals;

(3) a summary of existing policies of the Federal Government or State and local governments significantly affecting the competitiveness of the United States economy; and

(4) a summary of significant economic and technological developments, in the United States and abroad, affecting the competitive position of United States industries.

#### (b) Contents of report

The report submitted under subsection (a) shall—

(1) identify and describe actual or foreseeable developments, in the United States and abroad, which—

(A) create a significant likelihood of a competitive challenge to, or of substantial dislocation in, an established United States industry;

(B) present significant opportunities for United States industries to compete in new geographical markets or product markets, or to expand the position of such industries in established markets; or

(C) create a significant risk that United States industries shall be unable to compete successfully in significant markets;

(2) specify the industry sectors affected by the developments described in the report under paragraph (1); and

(3) contain a statement of the findings and recommendations of the Council during the previous fiscal year, including any recommendations of the Council for (a) such legislative or administrative actions as the Council considers appropriate, and (b) including the elimination, consolidation, reorganization of government agencies especially such agencies that specifically deal with research, science, technology, and international trade.

#### (c) Report by Congressional committees

The Council shall consult with each committee to which a report is submitted under this section and after such consultation, each such committee shall submit to its respective House a report setting forth the views and recommendations of such committee with respect to the report of the Council.

(Pub. L. 100–418, title V, §5208, Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1461; Pub. L. 101–382, title I, §133(d), Aug. 20, 1990, 104 Stat. 649.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1990—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 101–382 substituted "on March 1" for "prepare and".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on Governmental Affairs of Senate changed to Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of Senate, effective Jan. 4, 2005, by Senate Resolution No. 445, One Hundred Eighth Congress, Oct. 9, 2004.
#### Island Recycling Corp. et al., Appellants, v New York State Department of Taxation and Finance et al., Respondents.

[823 NYS2d 909]

In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that Tax Law § 1105 (c) (5) is unconstitutional as applied to the plaintiffs, the plaintiffs appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cohalan, J.), entered June 3, 2005, which, among other things, granted the defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment declaring that Tax Law § 1105 (c) (5) and 20 NYCRR 527.7 (a) are not unconstitutional as applied to the plaintiffs.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Despite the plaintiffs’ claims, the defendants’ interpretation of Tax Law § 1105 (c) (5) was neither irrational nor unreasonable *(see Matter of Chesterfield Assoc. v New York State Dept. of Labor,*4 NY3d 597, 605 [2005]; *Matter of Cecos Intl. v State Tax Commn.,*71 NY2d 934 [1988]; *Matter of Rochester Gas & Elec. Corp. v New York State Tax Commn.,*71 NY2d 931 [1988]). Furthermore, there is no merit to the plaintiffs’ claim that the defendants’ determination failed to adhere to prior agency precedent *(see*20 NYCRR 2375.11), or to their claim that the tax was not fairly apportioned *(see Oklahoma Tax Comm’n v Jefferson Lines, Inc.,*514 US 175 [1995]; *Matter of CWM Chem. Serv.,*2003 NY Tax LEXIS 307 [DTA No. 818757]).

The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions either are without merit or are not properly before this Court. Adams, J.E, Rivera, Skelos and Lifson, JJ., concur.
### §6302. Purposes

The purposes of this chapter are—

(1) to improve and expand the system of safety precautions that protects the welfare of professional boxers; and

(2) to assist State boxing commissions to provide proper oversight for the professional boxing industry in the United States.

(Pub. L. 104–272, §3, Oct. 9, 1996, 110 Stat. 3310.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1997, see section 23 of Pub. L. 104–272, set out as a note under section 6301 of this title.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 192 (Wednesday, October 3, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 60400]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-24301]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID DOD-2012-OS-0119]

Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, DoD.

ACTION: Notice to delete a system of records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of the Secretary of Defense is deleting a system of 
records notice from its existing inventory of record systems subject to 
the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a(r)), as amended.

DATES: This proposed action will be effective on November 5, 2012 
unless comments are received which result in a contrary determination. 
Comments will be accepted on or before November 2, 2012.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by any of the following methods:
     Federal Rulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
    Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 4800 Mark 
Center Drive, East Tower, 2nd Floor, Suite 02G09, Alexandria, VA 22350-
3100.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name 
and docket number for this Federal Register document. The general 
policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is 
to make these submissions available for public viewing on the Internet 
at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, 
including any personal identifiers or contact information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mrs. Cindy Allard, Privacy Act 
Officer, Office of Freedom of Information, Washington Headquarters 
Services, 1155 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-1155, or by 
telephone at (571) 372-0461.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Office of the Secretary of Defense 
systems of records notices subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 
U.S.C. 552a), as amended, have been published in the Federal Register 
and are available from the address in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. 
The Department of Defense proposes to delete a systems of records 
notice from its inventory of record systems subject to the Privacy Act 
of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended. The proposed deletion is not 
within the purview of subsection (r) of the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 
U.S.C. 552a), as amended, which requires the submission of a new or 
altered system report.

    Dated: September 26, 2012.
Morgan F. Park,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

Deletion:
DUSDP 02
    Special Personnel Security Cases, (February 22, 1993, 58 FR 10227).

Reason:
    Based on a review of DUSDP 02, Special Personnel Security Cases, it 
has been determined the system has never been used; therefore, it has 
never held records and can be deleted.

[FR Doc. 2012-24301 Filed 10-2-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
### §§5404 to 5406. Repealed. Pub. L. 106–34, §4(a), June 8, 1999, 113 Stat. 121

Section 5404, Pub. L. 101–592, §5, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 2945; Pub. L. 104–113, §11(d), Mar. 7, 1996, 110 Stat. 780, required testing and certification of fasteners.

Section 5405, Pub. L. 101–592, §6, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 2947; Pub. L. 104–113, §11(e), Mar. 7, 1996, 110 Stat. 781, provided for laboratory accreditation.

Section 5406, Pub. L. 101–592, §7, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 2948; Pub. L. 104–113, §11(f), Mar. 7, 1996, 110 Stat. 781, related to sale of domestic and imported fasteners subsequent to manufacture.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

FRANCIS BOYD,

Petitioner

v.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF

PHILADELPHIA COUNTY,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 172 EM 2016

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 31st day of October

, 201 7

, the Application Seeking Enforcement

is DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 47 (Thursday, March 10, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 13240]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5438]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES


National Endowment for the Arts; National Council on the Arts 
172nd Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting of 
the National Council on the Arts will be held on March 24-25 2011 in 
Rooms 716 and M-09 at the Nancy Hanks Center, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, 
NW., Washington, DC 20506.
    This meeting, from 5 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. on Thursday, March 24th in 
Room 716 and from 9 a.m. to 11 a.m. on Friday, March 25th in Room M-09 
(ending times are approximate), will be open to the public on a space 
available basis. The Thursday agenda will include review and voting on 
applications and guidelines. On Friday, the meeting will begin with 
opening remarks by the Chairman, followed by presentations on Arts 
Education: Engaging New Audiences and Interagency Partnerships. The 
meeting will adjourn following concluding remarks and announcement of 
voting results.
    A portion of this meeting, from 9 a.m. to 11 a.m. on Friday, March 
25th, will be webcast. The webcast can be accessed by going to Art 
Works blog at http://www.arts.gov/artworks.
    If, in the course of the open session discussion, it becomes 
necessary for the Council to discuss non-public commercial or financial 
information of intrinsic value, the Council will go into closed session 
pursuant to subsection (c)(4) of the Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 
U.S.C. 552b, and in accordance with the determination of the Chairman 
of November 10, 2009. Additionally, discussion concerning purely 
personal information about individuals, submitted with grant 
applications, such as personal biographical and salary data or medical 
information, may be conducted by the Council in closed session in 
accordance with subsection (c)(6) of 5 U.S.C. 552b.
    Any interested persons may attend, as observers, Council 
discussions and reviews that are open to the public. If you need 
special accommodations due to a disability, please contact the Office 
of AccessAbility, National Endowment for the Arts, 1100 Pennsylvania 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20506, 202/682-5532, TTY-TDD 202/682-5429, 
at least seven (7) days prior to the meeting.
    Further information with reference to this meeting can be obtained 
from the Office of Communications, National Endowment for the Arts, 
Washington, DC 20506, at 202/682-5570.

    Dated: March 4, 2011.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, Office of Guidelines and Panel Operations.
[FR Doc. 2011-5438 Filed 3-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-P
WAIVER

       WAIVER,  dated as of April 15, 1999, (the "Effective Date") to the Credit
Agreement,  dated as of February 27, 1998 (as amended,  modified or supplemented
from time to time, the "Credit  Agreement"),  among Foamex Carpet Cushion,  Inc.
("Foamex  Carpet"),  the institutions  party thereto as Lenders (the "Lenders"),
the institutions  party thereto as Issuing Banks, and Citicorp USA, Inc. and The
Bank of Nova Scotia as Administrative Agents.

       The Lenders hereby  temporarily  waive compliance by Foamex Carpet of the
financial  covenants  contained  in  Article X of the  Credit  Agreement  to the
extent,  but  only  to the  extent,  of the  period  of time  commencing  on the
Effective  Date and  extending  through and  including May 5, 1999. As of May 6,
1999 all such  financial  covenants  shall be in full force and effect as though
they had never been waived.

       This Waiver  shall be governed by and  construed in  accordance  with the
laws of the  State of New York.  This  Waiver  may be  signed  in any  number of
counterparts, each of which shall be an original, with the same effect as if the
signatures  thereto and hereto were upon the same instrument.  Capitalized terms
not  defined  herein  shall  have the  meanings  ascribed  to them in the Credit
Agreement.



<PAGE>


       IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the undersigned have executed this Waiver as of the
date first written above.

                                          FOAMEX CARPET CUSHION, INC.

                                          By: /s/ George L. Karpinski
                                              ---------------------------------
                                              Name: George L. Karpinski
                                              Title: Senior Vice President


                                          CITICORP USA, INC.

                                          By: /s/
                                              ---------------------------------
                                              Name:
                                              Title:


                                          THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA

                                          By: /s/ Brian Allen
                                              ---------------------------------
                                              Name: Brian Allen
                                              Title: Senior Relationship Manager
#### § 1300.101 Cross references to employee ethical conduct standards and other applicable regulations.

Employees of the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) are subject to the executive branch-wide standards of ethical conduct at 5 CFR part 2635 and to the TVA regulations at 5 CFR part 7901 which supplement the executive branch-wide standards. In addition, certain TVA employees are subject to executive branch-wide financial disclosure regulations at 5 CFR part 2634.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Orthovita, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph M. Paiva, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
based on my knowledge:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Joseph M. Paiva

Joseph M. Paiva
Chief Financial Officer
March 28, 2003