alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000913497
<NAME>                        WNC HOUSING TAX CREDIT FUND IV L.P., SERIES 2
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             0
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                             0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        



</TABLE>
§ 367.9 Prior period items. ( a ) Items of profit and loss related to the following must be accounted for as prior period adjustments and excluded from the determination of net income for the current year: ( 1 ) Correction of an error in the financial statements of a prior year.
( 2 ) Adjustments that result from realization of income tax benefits of pre-acquisition operating loss carry forwards of purchased subsidiaries.
( b ) All other items of profit and loss recognized during the year must be included in the determination of net income for that year.
### §690p. Authorizations of appropriations

#### (a) In general

Subject to the availability of appropriations, the Administrator is authorized to make $15,000,000 in operational assistance grants under section 690h of this title for each of fiscal years 2008 and 2009.

#### (b) Funds collected for examinations

Funds deposited under section 690l(c)(2) of this title are authorized to be appropriated only for the costs of examinations under section 690l of this title and for the costs of other oversight activities with respect to the program established under this part.

(Pub. L. 85–699, title III, §397, as added Pub. L. 110–140, title XII, §1207, Dec. 19, 2007, 121 Stat. 1783.)
## ADVANCE NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING (ANOPR)

TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT (TSD):

Energy Conservation Standards for General Service Fluorescent Lamps and

Incandescent Reflector Lamps

February 19, 2008

U.S. Department of Energy

**Assistant Secretary** 

**Office of**  **Energy Efficiency**  **and Renewable**  **Energy**

**Building Technologies**  **Program**

**Appliances and**  **Commercial Equipment**  **Standards**

**Washington, DC**  **20585 This**  **Document was**  **prepared for**  **the Department**  **of Energy** 

**by staff**  **members of** 

**Navigant Consulting,**  **Inc., and**  **Lighting Research**  **Center**
### §23. Suits by United States; subpoenas for witnesses

In any suit, action, or proceeding brought by or on behalf of the United States subpoenas for witnesses who are required to attend a court of the United States in any judicial district in any case, civil or criminal, arising under the antitrust laws may run into any other district: Provided, That in civil cases no writ of subpoena shall issue for witnesses living out of the district in which the court is held at a greater distance than one hundred miles from the place of holding the same without the permission of the trial court being first had upon proper application and cause shown.

(Oct. 15, 1914, ch. 323, §13, 38 Stat. 736.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The antitrust laws, referred to in text, are defined in section 12 of this title.
#### § 11.8 Adjustment of annual charges.

All annual charges imposed under this subpart continue in effect as fixed unless changed as authorized by law.

[51 FR 24318, July 3, 1986]
§ 86.2 General requirements for traceability. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 39564 , May 9, 2024.
( a ) The regulations in this part apply only to covered livestock, as defined in § 86.1.
( b ) No person may move covered livestock interstate or receive such livestock moved interstate unless the livestock meet all applicable requirements of this part.
( c ) The regulations in this part will apply to the movement of covered livestock onto and from Tribal lands only when the movement is an interstate movement; *i.e.*, when the movement is across a State line.
( d ) In addition to meeting all applicable requirements of this part, all covered livestock moved interstate must be moved in compliance with all applicable provisions of APHIS program disease regulations (subchapter C of this chapter).
( e ) The interstate movement requirements in this part do not apply to the movement of covered livestock if: ( 1 ) The movement occurs entirely within Tribal land that straddles a State line and the Tribe has a separate traceability system from the States in which its lands are located; or
( 2 ) The movement is to a custom slaughter facility in accordance with Federal and State regulations for preparation of meat.
### §5. Bringing in additional parties

Whenever it shall appear to the court before which any proceeding under section 4 of this title may be pending, that the ends of justice require that other parties should be brought before the court, the court may cause them to be summoned, whether they reside in the district in which the court is held or not; and subpoenas to that end may be served in any district by the marshal thereof.

(July 2, 1890, ch. 647, §5, 26 Stat. 210.)
§ 1315.200 Agency and legislative liaison. ( a ) The prohibition on the use of appropriated funds, in § 1315.100 (a), does not apply in the case of a payment of reasonable compensation made to an officer or employee of a person requesting or receiving a Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement if the payment is for agency and legislative liaison activities not directly related to a covered Federal action.
( b ) For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, providing any information specifically requested by an agency or Congress is allowable at any time.
( c ) For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, the following agency and legislative liaison activities are allowable at any time only where they are not related to a specific solicitation for any covered Federal action: ( 1 ) Discussing with an agency (including individual demonstrations) the qualities and characteristics of the person's products or services, conditions or terms of sale, and service capabilities; and,
( 2 ) Technical discussions and other activities regarding the application or adaptation of the person's products or services for an agency's use.
( d ) For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, the following agencies and legislative liaison activities are allowable only where they are prior to formal solicitation of any covered Federal action: ( 1 ) Providing any information not specifically requested but necessary for an agency to make an informed decision about initiation of a covered Federal action;
( 2 ) Technical discussions regarding the preparation of an unsolicited proposal prior to its official submission; and,
( 3 ) Capability presentations by persons seeking awards from an agency pursuant to the provisions of the Small Business Act, as amended by Public Law 95-507 and other subsequent amendments.
( e ) Only those activities expressly authorized by this section are allowable under this section.
Cite as 2016 Ark. 10



## SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS
No. CR-15- 899

ZACHARY HOLLY APPELLANT
V.
STATE OF ARKANSAS APP ELLEE Opinion Delivered January 14, 2016 APPEAL FROM THE BENTON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [ NO

. C R

- 20 1 3

- 1

- 2 ]
HONORABLE BRAD KARREN , JUDGE
PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIOR ARI TO COMPLETE THE RECORD GRANTED

. PER CURIAM Kent McLemore, attorney for appellant, Zachary Holly, petitions this court under Ark. Sup.Ct. R. 3-5 to issue a writ of certiorari directing the court reporter, Sharon Fields, to complete the record in this case. Petitioner states that the court reporter notified him that she is unable to prepare the record by December 29, 2015, the extended deadline, which was seven months from the date of the entry of the judgment. Attorney McLemore filed this petition prior to the record ’ s due date asking this court to issue a writ of certiorari directing the court reporter to complete the record. Petitioner filed a partial record on November 4, 2015. Arkansas Rule of Appellate Procedure

– Civil 5(b)(2) states, “In no event shall the time be extended more than seven (7) months from the date of the entry of the judgment or order . . . .”
We issue the writ of

certiorari directing Ms. Sharon Fields to complete the record in this matter within thirty days from the date of this order. The Supreme Court Clerk isCite as 2016 Ark. 10

2 directed to forward a copy of this per curiam to the Board of Certified Court Reporter Examiners for any action it may deem appropriate under its rules. See Epps v. State , 338 Ark. 551, 998 S.W.2d 419 (1999). Petition for writ of certiorari to complete the record is granted.
§ 3c.2 Nonpublic information. ( a ) Section 1264(d) (42 U.S.C. 16452(d)) of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 2005, section 301(b) (16 U.S.C. 825(b)) of the Federal Power Act, and section 8(b) (15 U.S.C. 717g) of the Natural Gas Act prohibit any employee, in the absence of Commission or court direction, from divulging any fact or information which may come to his or her knowledge during the course of examination of books or other accounts.
( b ) The nature and time of any proposed action by the Commission are confidential and shall not be divulged to anyone outside the Commission. The Secretary of the Commission has the exclusive responsibility and authority for authorizing the initial public release of information concerning Commission proceedings.
[Order 589, 61 FR 43415, Aug. 23, 1996, as amended by Order 699, 72 FR 45323, Aug. 14, 2007]
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 May 12, 2011
    By:
    /s/ Rocco B. CommissoRocco B. CommissoChairman and Chief Executive OfficerBy:
    /s/ Mark E. StephanMark E. StephanExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Invites Applications for Funding to Help Support Commercial Scale Biorefineries

WASHINGTON, August 3, 2018 – Assistant to the Secretary for Rural Development Anne Hazlett today

announced that USDA is accepting applications for funding under the Biorefinery, Renewable Chemical, and 

Biobased Product Manufacturing Assistance Program.

The purpose of this program is to provide guaranteed loans to fund the development, construction, and 

retrofitting of commercial scale biorefineries using eligible technology and of Biobased product manufacturing 

facilities that convert renewable chemicals and other biobased outputs of biorefineries into end-user products, 

on a commercial scale. The program’s objectives and outcomes are to: 

(1) create jobs and enhance the economic development of the rural economy;

(2) diversify markets for agricultural and forestry products and agriculture waste material;

(3) increase the energy independence of the United States; and

(4) promote resource conservation, public health, and the environment.

For FY 2018, USDA is announcing two separate application cycles with the following due dates and times:

• October 1, 2018 (Due by 4:30 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time)

• April 1, 2019 (Due by 4:30 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time)

Applications received after the first deadline will be considered for the subsequent application cycle, provided 

that funding is still available. For more information on how to apply, see page 38119 of the August 3 Federal 

Register.

USDA encourages applications that will support recommendations made in the report to the President from the 

Task Force on Agriculture and Rural Prosperity to help improve life in rural America. Applicants are 

encouraged to consider projects that provide measurable results in helping rural communities build robust and 

sustainable economies through strategic investments in infrastructure, partnerships and innovation. Key 

strategies include:

• Achieving e-Connectivity for Rural America

• Developing the Rural Economy

• Harnessing Technological Innovation

• Supporting a Rural Workforce

• Improving Quality of Life

#
#### Payton *v.*Ford.

Fish, C. J.

1. The allegations of the petition and the evidence submitted in support of the same authorized the grant of an interlocutory injunction against the plaintiff in error.

2. Upon the hearing of an application for an interlocutory injunction, if the prayer be granted, it operates to grant the injunction until the final hearing. While it is improper to grant a permanent injunction at such a hearing, the error in granting such an injunction will not require a *588reversal, but only a direction that the order be so modified as to render the injunction granted interlocutory instead of permanent. *Bleyer*v. *Blum & Co.,*70 *Ga. 558; Mayor etc. of Brunswick*v. *Williams,*131 *Ga.*429 (62 S. E. 230)*; Unity Cotton Mills*v. *Dunson,*131 *Ga.*258 (62 S. E. 179).

June 16, 1910.

Injunction. Before Judge Park. - Worth superior court.

September *27,*1909.

*C. E. Hay,*for plaintiff in error.

*J. J. Forehand*and *L. D. Passmore,*contra.

*Judgment affirmed, with direction.*

*All the Justices concur.*
#### § 153.22 Amendments and withdrawals.

Amendments to or withdrawals of applications must conform to the requirements of §§ 385.215 and 385.216 of this chapter.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7250

RUSSELL SMITH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Municipal Corporation, 

individually and in official capacity as Municipal 

Corporation; GARY D. MAYNARD, Municipal Corporation 

Official, individually and in his official capacity as 

Secretary of Public Safety; MICHAEL J. STOUFFER, Municipal 

Corporation Official, individually and in his official 

capacity as Commissioner of Corrections; SCOTT S. OAKLEY, 

Municipal Corporation Official, individually and in his 

official capacity as Executive Director of Inmate Grievance 

Office,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District 

Judge. (8:11-cv-02125-PJM)

Submitted: February 9, 2012 Decided: February 14, 2012

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Russell Smith, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Russell Smith appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(e) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. See Smith v. Dep’t of Pub. Safety, No. 

8:11-cv-02125-PJM (D. Md. filed Aug. 12 & entered Aug. 15, 

2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 50 (Tuesday, March 15, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 13976]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5787]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service

Tri-County Advisory Committee Meeting

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community 
Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-393) the Beaverhead-
Deerlodge National Forest's Tri-County Resource Advisory Committee will 
meet on Thursday April 7, 2011, from 5 p.m. until 8 p.m., in Deer 
Lodge, Montana. The purpose of the meeting is to review funding 
proposals for Title II funding.

DATES: Thursday, April 7, 2011, from 5 p.m. until 8 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the USDA building located 1002 
Hollenback Road, Deer Lodge, Montana (MT 59722).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patty Bates, Committee Coordinator, 
Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest, 420 Barrett Road, Dillon, MT 
59725 (406) 683-3979; e-mail [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Agenda for this meeting include discussion 
about (1) accomplishments; (2) election of a new chairperson; and (3) 
budget, priorities and funding for new project proposals. The meeting 
is open to the public. Public input opportunity will be provided and 
individuals will have the opportunity to address the Committee at that 
time.

    Dated: March 7, 2011.
David R. Myers,
Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 2011-5787 Filed 3-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
```
<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT 10.40(a)

                    Allonge To Subordinated Promissory Note

     Under date of November 17, 1999, Nutrition For Life International, Inc., a
Texas corporation ("NFLI") made a Subordinated Promissory Note (the "Note") to
Pailla Reddy ("Reddy") in the principal amount of $2,500,000.

     NFLI and Reddy agree to amend the Note to provide that the first payment of
principal of $1,000,000, plus interest, which was originally due one year from
the date of the Note shall be due the earlier to occur of (i) the sale of all or
substantially all of the assets or stock of NFLI; or (ii) May 17, 2001.

     This Allonge is an amendment to the Note and does not constitute discharge
of the Note.
     This Allonge has been executed to be effective November 17, 2000, and is
subject to the consent of General Electric Capital Corporation, NFLI's Senior
Lender.

                                          NUTRITION FOR LIFE INTERNATIONAL, INC.


                                          ______________________________________
                                          Signature

                                          David P. Bertrand
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Print Name

                                          President
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Title

     ACCEPTED:

     ________________________________
     Pailla Reddy
§ 81.5 Records originating outside GAO, records of interviews, or records involving work in progress. ( a ) It is the policy of GAO not to provide records from its files that originate in another agency or nonfederal organization to persons who may not be entitled to obtain the records from the originator. In such instances, requesters will be referred to the person or organization that originated the records.
( b ) It is the policy of GAO that prior to the release of a record of interview created by GAO in connection with an audit, evaluation, or investigation of a program, activity, or funding of a government entity, GAO will notify the agency from which an interview was obtained of the request. GAO will provide that agency with a reasonable opportunity to indicate whether the record of interview or portions thereof should be exempt from disclosure and the reason(s) for the exemption. The public disclosure of a record of interview remains within the discretion of GAO's Chief Quality Officer, but GAO will consider the views of the agency and the exemptions provided for under § 81.6 or any other law or regulation in deciding whether to release all or portions of a record of interview.
( c ) In order to avoid disruption of work in progress, and in the interests of fairness to those who might be adversely affected by the release of information which has not been fully reviewed to assure its accuracy and completeness, it is the policy of GAO not to provide records which are part of ongoing reviews or other current projects. In response to such requests, GAO will inform the requester of the estimated completion date of the review or project so that the requester may then ask for the records. At that time, the records may be released unless exempt from disclosure under § 81.6.
[68 FR 33832, June 6, 2003, as amended at 72 FR 50643, Sept. 4, 2007]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

December 13, 2011

No. 11-1250 & 11-1590

MARS HOME FOR YOUTH,

 Petitioner/Cross Respondent 

v.

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD,

 Respondent/Cross Petitioner

THE PENNSYLVANIA SOCIAL SERVICES UNION, LOCAL 668 OF 

THE SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO,

 Intervenor

(NLRB-1: 6CA-37135)

Present: MCKEE, Chief Judge, FUENTES and GREENBERG, Circuit Judges.

Motion by Respondent/Cross Petitioner, National Labor Relations Board, to 

Publish an Unreported Decision.

Respectfully,

Maria L. Reyes, Case Manager

_________________________________ORDER________________________________

The foregoing motion is granted.

By the Court,

/s/ Julio M. Fuentes

Circuit Judge

Dated: January 19, 2012

cc: Ronald J. Andrykovitch, Esq. 

 Ruth E. Burdick, Esq.
 Chairman Linda Dreeben, Esq. 

 MacKenzie Fillow, Esq. 

 Amy H. Ginn, Esq. 

 Jill A. Griffin, Esq. 

 Jessi D. Herman, Esq.

 Usha Dheenan, Esq.

 Claudia Davidson, Esq