alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 367.1760 Account 176, Derivative instrument assets—Hedges. ( a ) This account must include the amounts paid for derivative instruments, and the change in the fair value of derivative instrument assets designated by the service company as cash flow or fair value hedges.
( b ) When a service company designates a derivative instrument asset as a cash flow hedge it will record the change in the fair value of the derivative instrument in this account with a concurrent charge to account 219, Accumulated other comprehensive income (§ 367.2190), with the effective portion of the gain or loss. The ineffective portion of the cash flow hedge must be charged to the same income or expense account that will be used when the hedged item enters into the determination of net income.
( c ) When a service company designates a derivative instrument as a fair value hedge it must record the change in the fair value of the derivative instrument in this account with a concurrent charge to a subaccount of the asset or liability that carries the item being hedged. The ineffective portion of the fair value hedge must be charged to the same income or expense account that will be used when the hedged item enters into the determination of net income.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32


      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Overhill Farms,
Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended December 31, 2006 (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certify in their capacities as Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  January 29, 2007                    By: /s/ James Rudis
                                                --------------------------------
                                                James Rudis
                                                Chief Executive Officer
                                                (principal executive officer)


Dated:  January 29, 2007                    By: /s/ John L. Steinbrun
                                                --------------------------------
                                                John L. Steinbrun
                                                Chief Financial Officer
                                                (principal financial officer)


         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       25
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION

III 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029 MAY 232 The Honorable Shari T. Wilson, Secretary Maryland Department

of the Environment 1 800 Washington Boulevard Baltimore, MD 21230 Dear Secretary Wilson: On February

7, 2007, the United States Enviromriental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision
to the Maryland State Irnp]ementation Plan (SIP) from the Maryland Department
of the Environment pertaining

to a revision for the State Transportation Conformity SIP. EPA has deteimined that the submittal

is administrative]y
and technically complete, and is reviewing

it to prepare

a Notice of Proposed Rule making. If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to Martin Kotsch, Energy, Radiation and Indoor Environment Branch,

at (215) 814-3335. Martin
is the principal contact for this rulemaking. Slcerely, J 3 lith M. Katz, rector Air Protection Division cc: Diane Franks, Program Manager, Air Quality Planning, MDE Brian Hug, Acting Deputy Program Manager, Air Quality Planning, MDE Customer Service flotline: 1-800-438-2474
§ 157.23 Authorizations to Proceed with Construction Activities. With respect to orders issued pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 717b or 15 U.S.C. 717f(c) authorizing the construction of new natural gas transportation, export, or import facilities, no authorization to proceed with construction activities will be issued: ( a ) Until the time for the filing of a request for rehearing under 15 U.S.C. 717r(a) has expired with no such request being filed, or
( b ) If a timely request for rehearing raising issues reflecting opposition to project construction, operation, or need is filed, until: ( 1 ) The request is no longer pending before the Commission;
( 2 ) The record of the proceeding is filed with the court of appeals; or
( 3 ) 90 days has passed after the date that the request for rehearing may be deemed to have been denied under 15 U.S.C. 717r(a).
[Order 871, 85 FR 40115, July 6, 2020, as amended by Order 871-B, 86 FR 26160, May 13, 2021]
§ 22.17 Submission on the Record Without a Hearing [Rule 17]. ( a ) *General requirements.* Pursuant to § 22.16(a) of this part [Rule 16(a)], either party may elect to submit its case on the record without a hearing. Submission of a case without a hearing does not relieve the parties from the necessity of proving the facts supporting their claims or defenses.
( b ) *Conference in lieu of hearing.* If neither side desires a hearing, either party may request that a conference be held in lieu of a hearing with one or more members of the panel designated to decide the appeal, and such request may be granted at the discretion of the Board. The purpose of the conference is not to introduce new matters or evidence, but to permit explanations and argument of matters of record. If any new matter is introduced at the conference by either party, consideration of the appeal will be deferred until the opposing party has been apprised thereof and has had an opportunity to reply. Both parties will be afforded the right to be present at any such conference. At the request of a party, or on the Board's initiative, the conference may be stenographically or electronically recorded and transcribed pursuant to § 22.16(p) of this part [Rule 16(p)].
( c ) *Statement of the case.* The Board, at its discretion, may order a party that submits its case on the record without a hearing to submit a written statement of the case, including a legal and factual analysis of the relevant issues, within such period of time as the Board allows. The Board may also order parties to submit reply briefs. Briefs will be filed in accordance with the requirements of § 22.6(b) of this part [Rule 6(b)].
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 32


      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Overhill Farms,
Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended December 28, 2003 (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certify in their capacities as Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: February 9, 2004                        By: /s/ James Rudis
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   James  Rudis
                                                   Chief Executive Officer
                                                   (principal executive officer)


Dated: February 9, 2004                        By: /s/ John L. Steinbrun
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   John L. Steinbrun
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
                                                   (principal financial officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures
that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
# C_2013260EN.01000701.xml

| 7.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/7

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 July 2013 — The Dow Chemical Company, Dow Deutschland Inc., Dow Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH, Dow Europe GmbH v European Commission

(Case C-499/11 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Market in butadiene rubber and emulsion styrene butadiene rubber - Fixing price targets, sharing clients through non-aggression agreements and exchanging commercial information - Imputability of the offending conduct - Discretion enjoyed by the Commission - Multiplier for deterrence - Equal treatment)

2013/C 260/11

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellants: The Dow Chemical Company, Dow Deutschland Inc., Dow Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH, Dow Europe GmbH (represented by: D. Schroeder and T. Kuhn, Rechtsanwälte, and by T. Graf, advokat)

Appellants:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: M. Kellerbauer and V. Bottka, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment in Case T-42/07 Dow Chemical and Others v Commission, by which the General Court (First Chamber) dismissed in part the action for partial annulment of Commission Decision C(2006) 5700 final of 29 November 2006 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/F/38.638 — Butadiene Rubber and Emulsion Styrene Butadiene Rubber), concerning an agreement on the fixing of price targets, the sharing of clients through non-aggression agreements and the exchange of commercial information, and for reduction of the fine imposed on the appellants

Dow Chemical and Others

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders The Dow Chemical Company, Dow Deutschland Inc., Dow Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH and Dow Europe GmbH to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders The Dow Chemical Company, Dow Deutschland Inc., Dow Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH and Dow Europe GmbH to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 252, 27.8.2011.

1

---
§ 367.1070 Account 107, Construction work in progress. ( a ) This account must include the total of the balances of construction projects for service company property in process of construction.
( b ) Construction projects must be cleared from this account as soon as practicable after completion of the job. Further, if a project is designed to consist of two or more units that may be placed in service at different dates, any expenditures that are common to and that will be used in the operation of the project as a whole must be included in service company property upon the completion and the readiness for service of the first unit. Any expenditures that are identified exclusively with units of property not yet in service must be included in this account.
( c ) Expenditures on research, development, and demonstration projects for construction of facilities are to be included in a separate subaccount in this account. Records must be maintained to show separately each project along with complete detail of the nature and purpose of the research, development, and demonstration project together with the related costs.
###### Editorial Note on Part 284

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 284 appear at 65 FR 10222, Feb. 25, 2000.

#### § 284.301 Applicability.

This subpart implements section 5 of the Outer Continental Shelf Land Act (OCSLA) and applies to any jurisdictional interstate natural gas pipeline that holds a certificate under section 7 of the Natural Gas Act (NGA) authorizing the construction and operation of facilities on the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS).
1 can think in Spanish and speak
in English.

| know twice as many words.
| can read and write in two
pe oe languages.
SF > I understand two cultures.
Pe =>

1 ean enjoy twice as many friends.
My world is twice as wide.

| will take advantage of this
and discover my own path.

| will have faith in myself and
put all my efforts into school.
1am unique and | can do it!
#### § 1318.502 Tiering.

TVA may rely on tiering for the environmental review of proposed actions. Tiering involves coverage of general matters in broader EISs or EAs on programs, plans, and policies, and subsequent narrower analyses of implementing actions that incorporate by reference the broader analyses (*see* 40 CFR 1508.28).
# C_2013071EN.01000302.xml

| 9.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 71/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 71/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 22 January 2013 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundeskommunikationssenat — Austria) — Sky Österreich GmbH v Österreichischer Rundfunk

(Case C-283/11) (1)

1

(Directive 2010/13/EU - Provision of audiovisual media services - Article 15(6) - Validity - Events of high interest to the public that are subject to exclusive broadcasting rights - Right of access of broadcasters to such events for the purpose of making short news reports - Limitation of possible compensation for the holder of the exclusive right to additional costs incurred in providing such access - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Articles 16 and 17 - Proportionality)

2013/C 71/05

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundeskommunikationssenat

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Sky Österreich GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Österreichischer Rundfunk

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Bundeskommunikationssenat — Compatibility of Article 15(6) of Directive 2010/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 March 2010 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the provision of audiovisual media services (OJ 2010 L 95, p. 1) with the freedom to conduct a business and the right to property as guaranteed under Articles 16 and 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and Article 1 of the Additional Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms — Right of all broadcasters to benefit, for the production of short news programmes, from access to events of high interest to the public which are subject to exclusive broadcasting rights — Limitation of possible compensation to additional costs incurred in providing such access — Proportionality

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Consideration of the question raised has not disclosed any factor of such a kind as to affect the validity of Article 15(6) of Directive 2010/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 March 2010 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the provision of audiovisual media services (Audiovisual Media Services Directive).

---

(1)  OJ C 269, 10.9.2011.

1

---
§ 367.4264 Account 426.4, Expenditures for certain civic, political and related activities. ( a ) This account must include expenditures for the purpose of influencing public opinion with respect to the election or appointment of public officials, referenda, legislation, or ordinances (either with respect to the possible adoption of new referenda, legislation or ordinances or repeal or modification of existing referenda, legislation or ordinances) or approval, modification, or revocation of franchises; or for the purpose of influencing the decisions of public officials.
( b ) This account must not include expenditures that are directly related to appearances before regulatory or other governmental bodies in connection with an associate utility company's existing or proposed operations.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 687 

To provide for a temporary safe harbor for certain failures by individuals 

to pay estimated income tax. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 6, 2019 

Mrs. GILLIBRAND introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To provide for a temporary safe harbor for certain failures 

by individuals to pay estimated income tax. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Taxpayer Penalty Pro5 tection Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TEMPORARY SAFE HARBOR FOR FAILURE BY INDI7 VIDUALS TO PAY ESTIMATED INCOME TAX. 

8 In the case of a taxable year beginning in 2018— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 687 IS

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 6654(d)(1)(B) of 

2 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall be ap3 plied— 

4 (A) by substituting ‘‘80 percent’’ for ‘‘90 

5 percent’’ each place such term appears in clause 

6 (i) of such section, and 

7 (B) by substituting ‘‘80 percent’’ for ‘‘100 

8 percent’’ in clause (ii) of such section. 

9 (2) INDIVIDUALS WITH ADJUSTED GROSS IN10 COME OF $150,000.—In the case of an individual to 

11 whom section 6654(d)(1)(C) of such Code would 

12 (but for this paragraph) apply, section 6654 of such 

13 Code shall be applied without regard to— 

14 (A) paragraph (1)(B) of this Act, and 

15 (B) section 6654(d)(1)(C) of such Code. 

16 (3) FARMERS AND FISHERMEN.—Section 

17 6654(i) of such Code shall be applied without regard 

18 to this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Administration for Children and Families

                    This is to serve notice that the following                     **Federal Register**                     notice published on March 1, 2011, page 11250, is being rescinded:                

## Submission for OMB Review: Comment Request

*Title:*                     Child Care and Development Fund Tribal Plan Preprint—ACF-118-A.                

*OMB No.:*                     0970-0198.                

The original notice published on February 9, 2011, pages 7218-7219 is still in effect.

Dated: March 9, 2011.

Robert Sargis,

Reports Clearance Officer.

[FR Doc. 2011-5845 Filed 3-14-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4184-01-P
§ 35.38 Mitigation. ( a ) A Seller that has been found to have market power in generation or ancillary services, or that is presumed to have horizontal market power in generation or ancillary services by virtue of failing or foregoing the relevant market power screens, as described in 35.37(c), may adopt the default mitigation detailed in paragraph (b) of this section for sales of energy or capacity or paragraph (c) of this section for sales of ancillary services or may propose mitigation tailored to its own particular circumstances to eliminate its ability to exercise market power. Mitigation will apply only to the market(s) in which the Seller is found, or presumed, to have market power.
( b ) Default mitigation for sales of energy or capacity consists of three distinct products: ( 1 ) Sales of power of one week or less priced at the Seller's incremental cost plus a 10 percent adder;
( 2 ) Sales of power of more than one week but less than one year priced at no higher than a cost-based ceiling reflecting the costs of the unit(s) expected to provide the service; and
( 3 ) New contracts filed for review under section 205 of the Federal Power Act for sales of power for one year or more priced at a rate not to exceed embedded cost of service.
( c ) Default mitigation for sales of ancillary services consist of: ( 1 ) A cap based on the relevant OATT ancillary service rate of the purchasing transmission operator; or
( 2 ) the results of a competitive solicitation that meets the Commission's requirements for transparency, definition, evaluation, and competitiveness.
[Order 697, 72 FR 40038, July 20, 2007, as amended by Order 784, 78 FR 46210, July 30, 2013]
### §7108. Definitions

For purposes of this chapter—

(1) the term "Administration" means the Small Business Administration;

(2) the term "Administrator" means the Administrator of the Small Business Administration;

(3) the term "control" means exercising the power to make policy decisions concerning a business;

(4) the term "Council" means the National Women's Business Council, established under section 7105 of this title;

(5) the term "Interagency Committee" means the Interagency Committee on Women's Business Enterprise, established under section 7101 of this title;

(6) the term "operate" means being actively involved in the day-to-day management of a business;

(7) the term "women's business enterprise" means—

(A) a business or businesses owned by a woman or a group of women; or

(B) the establishment, maintenance, or development of a business or businesses by a woman or a group of women; and

(8) the term "women-owned business" means a small business which a woman or a group of women—

(A) control and operate; and

(B) own not less than 51 percent of the business.

(Pub. L. 100–533, title IV, §408, as added Pub. L. 103–403, title IV, §413, Oct. 22, 1994, 108 Stat. 4197.)