alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit  10.6a

                        AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

WHEREAS,  Raymond  J.  Kulla  (the  "Executive")  entered  in  to  an employment
agreement  (the  "Agreement")  with  WKI Holding Company, Inc. ("WKI") which was
executed  in  January  of  2003;  and

WHEREAS,  WKI  and  Executive  now  desire  to  amend  certain provisions of the
Agreement.

NOW,  THEREFORE,  pursuant  to Section 8.13 of the Agreement, the parties hereto
hereby  agree  as  follows  effective  as  of  April  30,  2003:

                                       I.

     Sections  1.26(a)(iv)  and  5.1 of the Agreement are each hereby amended by
deleing  the phrase "ninety (90) calendar days after Emergence" and replacing it
with  the  phrase  "one hundred twenty (120) calendar days after Emergence" each
time  it  appears  therein.

                                       II.

     Except  as  provided  in  Part  I of this Amendment, the Executive does not
waive  any  other  right  he has under the Agreement and the other terms thereof
shall  remain  in  full  force  and  effect.


     EXECUTED on the dates indicated below.



                                          Executive

Date:  April 15, 2003                     /s/  Raymond  J.  Kulla
      ----------------                    --------------------------
                                          Raymond  J.  Kulla


                                        WKI  Holding  Company,  Inc.


Date:  04/16/03                          By:  /s/  Terry  Peets
      -----------                        ---------------------------
                                              Acting  Chairman


<PAGE>
### §3606. Federal Housing Administration mortgage or loan insurance; expedition of application process and decision

Where an application for mortgage or loan insurance in connection with a conversion or purchase of a rental housing project being undertaken by a tenants' organization is submitted, the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development shall expedite the processing of the application in every way and shall make a final decision on such application at the earliest practicable time.

(Pub. L. 96–399, title VI, §607, Oct. 8, 1980, 94 Stat. 1676.)
# C_2011204EN.01002301.xml

| 9.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 204/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 204/23

---

Judgment of the General Court of 24 May 2011 — Euro-Information v OHIM (EURO AUTOMATIC CASH)

(Case T-392/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark EURO AUTOMATIC CASH - Absolute grounds for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2011/C 204/41

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Euro-Information — Européenne de traitement de l'information (Strasbourg, France) (represented by: A. Grolée, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 June 2010 (Case R 892/2010-2) concerning an application for registration of the word sign EURO AUTOMATIC CASH as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Euro-Information — Européenne de traitement de l'information to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Euro-Information — Européenne de traitement de l'information to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 301, 6.11.2010.

1

---
Deny and Opinion Filed July 17, 2015 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00815-CV 

IN RE KEITH COLEMAN AND CEDAR CANYON RANCH & VENUE, Relators 

Original Proceeding Appeal from the Probate Court No. 2 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. PR-13-00345-2 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Bridges, and Justice Brown 

Opinion by Justice Bridges 

Relator filed this petition for writ of mandamus requesting that the Court order the trial 

court to “dismiss without prejudice any and all orders and judgment” in this case and “issue an 

order dismissing without prejudice” the motion for summary judgment filed by real party in 

interest. Relators contend that the actions of the trial court were void. Mandamus relief is 

available if a trial court clearly abused its discretion by rendering a void order. In re Sw. Bell 

Tel. Co., 35 S.W.3d 602, 605 (Tex. 2000) (orig. proceeding). Relators have not demonstrated 

that the trial court’s orders were void. We deny the petition. 

150815F.P05 /David L. Bridges/ 

DAVID L. BRIDGES 

JUSTICE
# C_2012379EN.01002001.xml

| 8.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 379/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 379/20

---

Order of the President of the Court of 18 September 2012 — European Commission v Kingdom of the Netherlands

(Case C-473/11) (1)

1

2012/C 379/33

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 347, 26.11.2011.

1

---
# C_2012073EN.01001301.xml

| 10.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 73/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 73/13

---

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 December 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Alba, Romania) — Corpul Național al Polițiștilor v Ministerul Administrației și Internelor (MAI), Inspectoratul General al Poliției Române (IGPR), Inspectoratul de Poliție al Județului Alba (IPJ)

(Case C-434/11) (1)

1

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Admissibility of national legislation providing for salary reductions in relation to various categories of public officials - Failure to implement European Union law - Court clearly lacking jurisdiction)

2012/C 73/22

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunalul Alba

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Corpul Național al Polițiștilor

Applicant:

Defendants: Ministerul Administrației și Internelor (MAI), Inspectoratul General al Poliției Române (IGPR), Inspectoratul de Poliție al Județului Alba (IPJ)

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tribunalul Alba — Interpretation of Article 17(1), 20 and 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Admissibility of national legislation providing for salary reductions in relation to various categories of public officials — Infringement of the right to property and the principles of equal treatment and non-discrimination

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The Court of Justice of the European Union clearly lacks jurisdiction to reply to the question referred by the Tribunalul Alba, Romania, by decision of 28 July 2011.

---

(1)  OJ C 331, 12.11.2011.

1

---
Exhibit 23.1



                 INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



The Board of Directors
TMS, Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration
statement (no. 333-03909) on Form S-8 of TMS, Inc. of our
report dated October 19, 2000, relating to the balance
sheets of TMS, Inc. as of August 31, 2000 and 1999, and the
related statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and
cash flows for the years then ended, and the related
financial statement schedule, which report appears in the
August 31, 2000, annual report on Form 10-KSB of TMS, Inc.


                              KPMG LLP




Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
November 20, 2000
Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report  of Sunburst Acquisitions VI, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form  10-QSB for the period ending July 31, 2004  (the
"Report"), I,  Michael R. Quinn, Principal Executive Officer  and  Principal
Financial  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to  18  U.S.C.  Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of  2002,
that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the  Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.



/s/ Michael R. Quinn

-----------------------
Principal Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer
Date:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 725 Referred in House (RFH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 725

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 2019

           Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To change the address of the postal facility designated in honor of 
                         Captain Humayun Khan.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CAPTAIN HUMAYUN KHAN POST OFFICE.

    Section 1(a) of Public Law 115-347 (132 Stat. 5054) is amended by 
striking ``180 McCormick Road'' and inserting ``2150 Wise Street''.

            Passed the Senate March 7, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                JULIE E. ADAMS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7400

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

HENRY LEE TAYLOR, JR., a/k/a James Blair, a/k/a Junebug, a/k/a Bug, a/k/a J.B.,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Newport News. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (4:11-cr-00055-AWA-DEM-1)

Submitted: March 12, 2021 Decided: March 17, 2021

Before KEENAN, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Henry Lee Taylor, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Dee Mullarkey Sterling, Assistant United States

Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Newport News, Virginia, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Henry Lee Taylor, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for 

compassionate release. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Taylor, 

No. 4:11-cr-00055-AWA-DEM-1 (E.D. Va. Sept. 3, 2020). We further deny Taylor’s 

motion to place his case in abeyance. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 1318.40 Definitions.

The following definitions apply throughout this part. All other applicable terms should be given the same meaning as set forth in CEQ's currently effective regulations (40 CFR part 1508) unless such a reading would make the terms inconsistent with the context in which they appear.

*Controversial* refers to scientifically supported commentary that casts substantial doubt on the agency's methodology or data, but does not mean commentary expressing mere opposition.

*Floodplain* refers to the lowland and relatively flat areas adjoining flowing inland waters and reservoirs. Floodplain generally refers to the base floodplain, *i.e.,* that area subject to a 1 percent or greater chance of flooding in any given year.

*Important farmland* includes prime farmland, unique farmland, and farmland of statewide importance as defined in 7 CFR part 657.

*Natural and beneficial floodplain and wetland values* refer to such attributes as the capability of floodplains and wetlands to provide natural moderation of floodwaters, water quality maintenance, fish and wildlife habitat, plant habitat, open space, natural beauty, scientific and educational study areas, and recreation.

*Official responsible for NEPA compliance* refers to the TVA official who manages the NEPA compliance staff and is responsible for overall review of TVA NEPA compliance.

*Practicable,* as used in subpart G of this part, refers to the capability of an action being performed within existing constraints. The test of what is practicable depends on the situation and includes an evaluation of all pertinent factors, such as environmental impact, economic costs, statutory authority, legality, technological achievability, and engineering constraints.

*Wetland* refers to an area inundated by surface or ground water with a frequency sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances does or would support, a prevalence of vegetation or aquatic life that requires saturated or seasonally saturated soil conditions for growth and reproduction. Wetlands do not include temporary human-made ponds associated with active construction projects.
### §2901. Work-life policies and programs

The Commandant is authorized—

(1) to establish an office for the purpose of developing, promulgating, and coordinating policies, programs, and activities related to the families of Coast Guard members;

(2) to implement and oversee policies, programs, and activities described in paragraph (1) as the Commandant considers necessary; and

(3) to perform such other duties as the Commandant considers necessary.

(Added Pub. L. 113–281, title II, §214(a), Dec. 18, 2014, 128 Stat. 3029, §531; renumbered §2901, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §117(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4230.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2901 was renumbered section 5101 of this title.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 531 of this title as this section.
### §3103. National Employment Conference

#### (a) Organization and implementation

A National Employment Conference may be convened in the District of Columbia within a reasonable period of time after October 27, 1978. Responsibility for the organization and implementation of this conference shall rest with the President or the appropriate department or agency of the Federal Government, and the conference shall bring together leaders of small and larger business, labor, government, and all other interested parties.

#### (b) Subject matter

The subject of the conference shall be employment, with particular attention to structural unemployment and the plight of disadvantaged youth. The conference shall also focus on issues such as implementation of adequate and effective incentives for private sector employers to hire the hard-core unemployed. Special attention shall be given to the creation of jobs through the use of targeted employment tax credits, wage vouchers, and other incentives to private sector businesses.

(Pub. L. 95–523, §4, Oct. 27, 1978, 92 Stat. 1889.)
### §80a–33. Destruction and falsification of reports and records

#### (a) Willful destruction

It shall be unlawful for any person, except as permitted by rule, regulation, or order of the Commission, willfully to destroy, mutilate, or alter any account, book, or other document the preservation of which has been required pursuant to section 80a–30(a) or 80a–31(c) of this title.

#### (b) Untrue statements or omissions

It shall be unlawful for any person to make any untrue statement of a material fact in any registration statement, application, report, account, record, or other document filed or transmitted pursuant to this subchapter or the keeping of which is required pursuant to section 80a–30 (a) of this title. It shall be unlawful for any person so filing, transmitting, or keeping any such document to omit to state therein any fact necessary in order to prevent the statements made therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, from being materially misleading. For the purposes of this subsection, any part of any such document which is signed or certified by an accountant or auditor in his capacity as such shall be deemed to be made, filed, transmitted, or kept by such accountant or auditor, as well as by the person filing, transmitting, or keeping the complete document.

(Aug. 22, 1940, ch. 686, title I, §34, 54 Stat. 840.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of Securities and Exchange Commission, with certain exceptions, to Chairman of such Commission, see Reorg. Plan No. 10 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3175, 64 Stat. 1265, set out under section 78d of this title.
§ 1317.405 Housing. ( a ) *Generally.* A recipient shall not, on the basis of sex, apply different rules or regulations, impose different fees or requirements, or offer different services or benefits related to housing, except as provided in this section (including housing provided only to married students).
( b ) *Housing provided by recipient.* ( 1 ) A recipient may provide separate housing on the basis of sex.
( 2 ) Housing provided by a recipient to students of one sex, when compared to that provided to students of the other sex, shall be as a whole: ( i ) Proportionate in quantity to the number of students of that sex applying for such housing; and
( ii ) Comparable in quality and cost to the student.
( c ) *Other housing.* ( 1 ) A recipient shall not, on the basis of sex, administer different policies or practices concerning occupancy by its students of housing other than that provided by such recipient.
( 2 ) ( i ) A recipient which, through solicitation, listing, approval of housing, or otherwise, assists any agency, organization, or person in making housing available to any of its students, shall take such reasonable action as may be necessary to assure itself that such housing as is provided to students of one sex, when compared to that provided to students of the other sex, is as a whole: ( A ) Proportionate in quantity; and
( B ) Comparable in quality and cost to the student.
( ii ) A recipient may render such assistance to any agency, organization, or person that provides all or part of such housing to students of only one sex.
§ 292.601 Exemption to qualifying facilities from the Federal Power Act. ( a ) *Applicability.* This section applies to qualifying facilities, other than those described in paragraph (b) of this section. This section also applies to qualifying facilities that meet the criteria of section 3(17)(E) of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 796(17)(E)), notwithstanding paragraph (b).
( b ) *Exclusion.* This section does not apply to a qualifying small power production facility with a power production capacity which exceeds 30 megawatts, if such facility uses any primary energy source other than geothermal resources.
( c ) *General rule.* Any qualifying facility described in paragraph (a) of this section shall be exempt from all sections of the Federal Power Act, except: ( 1 ) Sections 205 and 206; however, sales of energy or capacity made by qualifying facilities 20 MW or smaller, or made pursuant to a contract executed on or before March 17, 2006 or made pursuant to a state regulatory authority's implementation of section 210 the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978, 16 U.S.C. 824a-1, shall be exempt from scrutiny under sections 205 and 206;
( 2 ) Section 1-18, and 21-30;
( 3 ) Sections 202(c), 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 220, 221 and 222;
( 4 ) Sections 305(c); and
( 5 ) Any necessary enforcement provision of part III of the Federal Power Act (including but not limited to sections 306, 307, 308, 309, 314, 315, 316 and 316A) with regard to the sections listed in paragraphs (c)(1), (2), (3) and (4) of this section.
(Energy Security Act, Pub. L. 96-294, 94 Stat. 611 (1980) Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978, 16 U.S.C. 2601, *et seq.,* Energy Supply and Environmental Coordination Act, 15 U.S.C. 791, *et seq.,* Federal Power Act, as amended, 16 U.S.C. 792 *et seq.,* Department of Energy Organization Act, 42 U.S.C. 7101, *et seq.;* E.O. 12009, 42 FR 46267)
[Order 135, 46 FR 19232, Mar. 30, 1981, as amended by Order 569, 59 FR 40470, Aug. 9, 1994; Order 671, 71 FR 7868, Feb. 15, 2006; 72 FR 29063, May 24, 2007; Order 732, 75 FR 15966, Mar. 30, 2010]
1... See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4.

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-08-251-CV

LYDIA ESTHER RODRIGUEZ APPELLANT

V.

VICTOR MANUEL RODRIGUEZ APPELLEE

----------

FROM THE 211 DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY TH

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT 1

----------

We have considered “Appellant’s Unopposed Motion To Dismiss Appeal.”

It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we

dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution

issue. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL D: DAUPHINOT, HOLMAN, and GARDNER, JJ.
DELIVERED: July 10, 2008