alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013009EN.01002301.xml

| 12.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 9/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/23

---

Order of the Court of 15 October 2012 — Internationaler Hilfsfonds eV v European Commission

(Case C-554/11 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Access to documents - Refusal of full access to documents relating to contract LIEN 97-2011 - Action for annulment - Fresh examination in the course of proceedings - Bringing a separate annulment action)

2013/C 9/37

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Internationaler Hilfsfonds eV (represented by: H. Kaltenecker, Rechtsanwalt)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: P. Costa de Oliveira and T. Scharf, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the order of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 September 2011 in Case T-141/05 RENV Internationaler Hilfsfonds v Commission, by which the Court ordered that there is no longer any need to give a ruling on the applicant’s form of order seeking the annulment of the decision of the European Commission of 14 February 2005, rejecting its request for access to the file relating to contract LIEN 97-2011 — Procedural irregularities before the Court — Failure to deal with Cases T-141/05 RENV and T-36/10 in a coordinated manner — Burden and amount of costs

Internationaler Hilfsfonds

Commission

Operative part

Operative part

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Internationaler Hilfsfonds eV is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Internationaler Hilfsfonds eV is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 25, 28.1.2012.

1

---
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT SANJIV GOEL, M .D., INC ., a C a lifornia c orpora iton, Pla i ntiff-Appe lla nt,
v. M OTION PIC TURE INDUSTR Y PENSION AND HEALTH PLAN, a C a l ifornia c orporat ion, De fe nda n t-Appe l le e . No. 15-56345 D.C . No. 2:14-c v-02056-PSG-C W
M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the C e ntra l Distric t of C a lifornia Philip S. Gutierre z , Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d M arc h 7, 2017 ** Pa sa de n a , C a l ifornia B e fore : PAEZ, B ER

ZON, a n d C HR ISTEN, C irc uit Judge s. Sanjiv Goe l a

ppe a ls the distric t c ourt’ s ruling tha t the M otion Pic ture Industry Pe nsion a

nd He a lth Pla

n did not a

buse its disc re tion whe n it c onc lude d



# F IL ED MAR 14 2017 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3.

* * The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a )(2).that

the subje c t se rvic e s he provide d we re not e ligiblefor re im burse m e nt a s e m e rge n c y

room se rvic e s. 1 W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a nd we
a ffirm
. The Pla n g i ve s its dire c tors disc re tion to de c ide e ligibility for, a nd the e xte nt of, be n e fits provide d by

the Plan. For billing purpose s, the Pla n distinguishe s be twe e n “ Em e rge nc y

R oom Se rvic e s” and othe r se rvic e s. The Plan re im burse s for
non-e m e rge nc y

room se rvic e s at a

diffe re nt rate tha

n e m e rge nc y

room se rvic e s. He re , the dispute d se rvic e s we re not provide d in the e m e rge nc y room but in
a se p ara te loc ation in the

hospita l, a

nd we re provide d a fte r the patie nt wa s a dm itte d to the hospita l via

the c ardia c c athe te riz ation la b . It wa s not a

n a buse of disc re tion for the pla

n a dm inistra

tors to c onc lude tha

t the dispute d se rvic e s we re not e ntitle d to re im burse m e nt a

t the e m e rge nc y

room se rvic e s ra te . Se e Gatti v . Re lianc e Standard Life

Ins. C o . , 415 F.3d 978, 981 (9th C i r. 2005). AFFIRM E D.

1 The pa rtie s are fam ilia

r with thefa c ts so we do not repe at the m he re . 2
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Service Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark L. Abbate, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-B (Item 601(b)(32))
promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Securities Act) and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act). In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not
be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/    MARK L. ABBATE  
|Mark L. Abbate         
|Chief Financial Officer
|November 14, 2008
# C_2013260EN.01000401.xml

| 7.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 July 2013 — Fédération internationale de football association (FIFA) v European Commission, Kingdom of Belgium, and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

(Case C-205/11 P) (1)

1

(Appeals - Television broadcasting - Directive 89/552/EEC - Article 3a - Measures taken by the United Kingdom concerning events of major importance for the society of that Member State - Football World Cup - Decision declaring the measures compatible with European Union law - Statement of reasons - Articles 43 EC, 49 EC and 86 EC - Right to property)

2013/C 260/05

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Fédération internationale de football association (FIFA) (represented by: A. Barav and D. Reymond, avocats)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: E. Montaguti and N. Yerrell, acting as Agents, and M. Gray, Barrister), Kingdom of Belgium (represented by: C. Pochet, J.-C. Halleux, acting as Agents, and A. Joachimowicz and J. Stuyck, advocaten), and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented by: S. Ossowski and J. Beeko, acting as Agents, and T. de la Mare QC)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 17 February 2011 in Case T-68/08 Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) v Commission dismissing an action for annulment of Commission Decision 2007/730/EC of 16 October 2007 declaring compatible with Community law measures taken by the United Kingdom pursuant to Article 3a(1) of Council Directive 89/552/EEC of 3 October 1989 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities (OJ 2007 L 295, p. 12)

Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA)

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders the Fédération internationale de football association (FIFA) to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Fédération internationale de football association (FIFA) to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 232, 6.8.2011.

1

---
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Dana S. Philbrook, hereby certify that:



(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Service Bancorp, Inc.;



(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



(4) The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



(5) The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal controls over financial reporting.



|                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ DANA S. PHILBROOK                                      
|Dana S. Philbrook Chief Financial Officer February 10, 2006
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk January 27, 2009

l0120 

# Order

January 27, 2009

136506 & (47)

ATTORNEY GENERAL, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 136506 COA: 275135 MPSC: U-00-014547 MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION and CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY, Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e April 10, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented sh ould be reviewed by this Court. The
miscellaneous motion is GRANTED.
### §1537. Needs assessment for data management, archival, and distribution

(1) Not later than 12 months after October 29, 1992, and at least biennially thereafter, the Secretary of Commerce shall complete an assessment of the adequacy of the environmental data and information systems of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. In conducting such an assessment, the Secretary shall take into consideration the need to—

(A) provide adequate capacity to manage, archive, and disseminate environmental data and information collected and processed, or expected to be collected and processed, by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and other appropriate departments and agencies;

(B) establish, develop, and maintain information bases, including necessary management systems, which will promote consistent, efficient, and compatible transfer and use of data;

(C) develop effective interfaces among the environmental data and information systems of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and other appropriate departments and agencies;

(D) develop and use nationally accepted formats and standards for data collected by various national and international sources; and

(E) integrate and interpret data from different sources to produce information that can be used by decisionmakers in developing policies that effectively respond to national and global environmental concerns.

(2) Not later than 12 months after October 29, 1992, and biennially thereafter, the Secretary of Commerce shall develop and submit to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives a comprehensive plan, based on the assessment under paragraph (1), to modernize and improve the environmental data and information systems of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The report shall—

(A) set forth modernization and improvement objectives for the 10-year period beginning with the year in which the plan is submitted, including facility requirements and critical new technological components that would be necessary to meet the objectives set forth;

(B) propose specific agency programs and activities for implementing the plan;

(C) identify the data and information management, archival, and distribution responsibilities of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration with respect to other Federal departments and agencies and international organizations, including the role of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration with respect to large data systems like the Earth Observing System Data and Information System; and

(D) provide an implementation schedule and estimate funding levels necessary to achieve modernization and improvement objectives.

(Pub. L. 102–567, title I, §106(c), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4274.)
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 26, 2012

N o. 04-12-00763-CV

RAJASEKHAR BORRA M.D. AND INPATIENT CONSULTANTS OF TEXAS P.L.L.C.

, Appellants

v.

Rachael HERNANDEZ, Individually and on behalf of The Estate of Ricardo Hernandez Jr.

Deceased, Ricardo Hernandez III, Tanya A. Hernandez, Roxanne H. Hernandez, Katherine A.

Young and Rachael Lee Hernandez,

Appellees

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010-CI-01562

John D. Gabriel Jr., Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The District Clerk’s Notification of Late Record is GRANTED IN PART to November

29, 2012. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 35.3(c) (2012 amendment provides each extension of time to file a

record in an accelerated appeal must not exceed 10 days).

____________________________________ Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 26 th day of November, 2012

.

____________________________________ Keith E. Hottle, ClerkVOL.

_____ PAGE

_______ MINUTES

Court of Appeals

Fourth Court of Appeals District

San Antonio, Texas

November 26, 2012

N o. 04-12-00763-CV

RAJASEKHAR BORRA M.D. AND INPATIENT CONSULTANTS OF TEXAS P.L.L.C.,

Appellants

v.

Rachael HERNANDEZ, Individually and on behalf of The Estate of Ricardo Hernandez Jr.

Deceased, Ricardo Hernandez III, Tanya A. Hernandez, Roxanne H. Hernandez, Katherine A.

Young and Rachael Lee Hernandez,

Appellees

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010-CI-01562

John D. Gabriel Jr., Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The District Clerk’s Notification of Late Record is GRANTED IN PART to November

29, 2012. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 35.3(c) (2012 amendment provides each extension of time to file a

record in an accelerated appeal must not exceed 10 days).

/S/ Catherine Stone

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 26 th day of November, 2012.

/s/ Keith E. Hottle

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk

ENTERED THIS 26 TH DAY OF November, 2012

.
### §5207. Department of Defense

#### (a) Focus of research

In conformance with the Superconductivity Action Plan, the Secretary of Defense, in the superconductivity research and development activities of the Department of Defense, shall give emphasis to fundamental research, materials processing, and applications of new superconducting materials.

#### (b) Additional activities

In conducting research under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense shall—

(1) systematically define the engineering parameters for high-temperature superconducting materials; and

(2) conduct the necessary development, engineering, and operational prototype testing considered appropriate to the overall mission of the Department of Defense. Such operational prototype testing shall, where appropriate, utilize criteria developed by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency.

#### (c) Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency

The Director of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency shall, in conformance with the Superconductivity Action Plan, conduct activities to—

(1) augment, as appropriate, basic and applied superconductivity research conducted in other Federal agencies and industry; and

(2) develop criteria for operational prototype testing within the Department of Defense.

(Pub. L. 100–697, §8, Nov. 19, 1988, 102 Stat. 4615.)
Exhibit 23



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File nos. 33-84754, 33-84756, 333-16765, 333-109673) of MK Resources
Company of our report dated March 10, 2005, except for the third paragraph of Note 1 and Note 18 for which the date is May 12, 2005, relating to the financial statements, which appear in this Form 10-K/A.



|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
|                              
|PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP    
|Salt Lake City, Utah          

May 16, 2005
# C_2013114EN.01001301.xml

| 20.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 114/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 114/13

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 28 February 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Baden-Württemberg — Germany) — Katja Ettwein v Finanzamt Konstanz

(Case C-425/11) (1)

1

(Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons - Equal treatment - Self-employed frontier workers - Nationals of a Member State of the Union - Business income received in that Member State - Transfer of residence to Switzerland - Refusal of a tax advantage in that Member State because of the transfer of residence)

2013/C 114/17

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Finanzgericht Baden-Württemberg

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Katja Ettwein

Applicant:

Defendant: Finanzamt Konstanz

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Finanzgericht Baden-Württemberg — Interpretation of the Agreement of 21 June 1999 between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons, approved in the name of the Community, by decision of the Council and the Commission of 4 April 2002 (OJ 2002 L 114, p. 6), in particular Articles 1, 2, 11, 16 and 21 and Articles 9, 13 and 15 of Annex I — Direct taxation of frontier workers — Legislation of a Member State allowing joint taxation of spouses (‘Ehegattensplitting’) if they live in a Member State of the European Union or the European Economic Area but not if they live in the Swiss Confederation

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 1(a) of the Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons, signed in Luxembourg on 21 June 1999, and Articles 9(2), 13(1) and 15(2) of Annex I to that Agreement must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State which refuses the benefit of joint taxation with the use of the ‘splitting’ method, provided for by that legislation, to spouses who are nationals of that State and subject to income tax in that State on their entire taxable income, on the sole ground that their residence is situated in the territory of the Swiss Confederation.

---

(1)  OJ C 331, 12.11.2011.

1

---