alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 
THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR 
THE PERIOD ENDED JULY 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,515<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                     39,318
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                76,268      
<PP&E>                                         102,855     
<DEPRECIATION>                                  30,106   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 170,104     
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           48,406   
<BONDS>                                         49,443 
<COMMON>                                            83
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      62,591      
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   170,104        
<SALES>                                        240,664         
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               240,664         
<CGS>                                          209,290         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  209,290         
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,000      
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0     
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,411      
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,374      
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,648     
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,726     
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0     
<CHANGES>                                            0 
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,726
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>

<F1> Notes and accounts receivable -- trade are reported net of allowances for
     doubtful accounts in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Herbert Hofmann, a Person Alleged to be Incapacitated. Charyn D. Powers, as Court-Appointed Guardian, Respondent; Genevieve Pignarre, Also Known as Genevieve Pignarre Hofmann, Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 397]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (William J. Davis, J.), entered on or about September 26, 2005, denying appellant’s motion to authorize respondent guardian to pay fees to appellant’s counsel and expert in the underlying matrimonial litigation, unanimously modified, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to grant the motion insofar as to direct respondent to reapply to the trustee(s) of the incapacitated person’s trust for payment, and in so doing to indicate that the counsel fees sought are necessaries of the incapacitated person, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

*244Appellant’s legal fees in the underlying litigation are properly viewed as necessaries of her then husband *(see Elder v Rosenwasser,*238 NY 427 [1924]; *Alter & Alter v Friedman,*210 AD2d 105 [1994]), the subject incapacitated person. If respondent advises the trustee(s) that, contrary to their initial assumption, the counsel fees awarded by the matrimonial court are necessaries of the trust beneficiary, the incapacitated person, there would seem no principled ground upon which the trustees’ objection to the payment of such fees might be sustained. Although the trust and trustee(s) are located in Gibraltar and may be beyond our jurisdiction, respondent is not. It is pertinent to note as well that there are also within this jurisdiction substantial nontrust assets of the incapacitated person.

The parties’ other arguments are not properly before us inasmuch as they seek relief from unappealed orders; the paper appealed is not a final judgment and does not bring up for review the prior orders the parties would have us consider. Concur—Buckley, EJ., Tom, Mazzarelli, Saxe and McGuire, JJ.
### §77a. Short title

This subchapter may be cited as the "Securities Act of 1933".

(May 27, 1933, ch. 38, title I, §1, 48 Stat. 74.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title of 2012 Amendment

Pub. L. 112–142, §1, July 9, 2012, 126 Stat. 989, provided that: "This Act [amending section 77c of this title] may be cited as the 'Church Plan Investment Clarification Act'."

Pub. L. 112–106, title III, §301, Apr. 5, 2012, 126 Stat. 315, provided that: "This title [enacting section 77d–1 of this title, amending sections 77d, 77r, 78c, 78l, and 78o of this title, and enacting provisions set out as notes under sections 77d, 77r, 78c, and 78l of this title] may be cited as the 'Capital Raising Online While Deterring Fraud and Unethical Non-Disclosure Act of 2012' or the 'CROWDFUND Act'."

#### Short Title of 1980 Amendment

Pub. L. 96–477, title VI, §601, Oct. 21, 1980, 94 Stat. 2294, provided that: "This title [amending sections 77b and 77d of this title] may be cited as the 'Small Business Issuers' Simplification Act of 1980'."
#### Jerusha I. Hall, Respondent, v. The City of New York, Appellant.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Present — Woodward, Jenks, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ.
UsE YOUR BRAIN!
DON'T WAIT FOR
RAIN!

Leon the Lightning Lion says:

Lightning can hurt you, even BEFORE
it rains!

When you hear thunder:

- Go indoors quickly

- Head for a fully enclosed house,
school, or large building

- If you can't get indoors, getina
hard top car, bus, or truck
Exhibit 99.1

Section 906 Certification

 

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) I have reviewed the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Inland Monthly Income Fund II, L.P. (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;

(2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(3) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inland Monthly Income Fund II, L.P.

 

 

By: Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation

       General Partner

 

/S/ Brenda G. Gujral_________________________________

Name: Brenda G. Gujral

Title: President of the General Partner and

          Principal Executive Officer of Inland Monthly Income Fund II, L.P

Date: March 25, 2003
§ 1318.302 EA preparation. ( a ) As soon as practicable after deciding to prepare an EA, the initiating TVA entity, in consultation with NEPA compliance staff, shall convene an internal coordination team to discuss: ( 1 ) Reasonable alternatives,
( 2 ) Permit requirements,
( 3 ) Coordination with other agencies (consistent with § 1318.401),
( 4 ) Environmental issues,
( 5 ) Public involvement, and
( 6 ) A schedule for EA preparation.
( b ) The EA will describe the proposed action and include brief discussions of the purpose and need for action, reasonable alternatives, the no-action alternative (consistent with § 1318.400(e)), the environmental impacts of the proposed action and alternatives, measures (if any) to mitigate such impacts, a listing of the agencies and persons consulted, and a list of permits that may be required for the proposed action.
( c ) As appropriate, EAs will identify alternatives that were considered, but not addressed in further detail in the EA.
( d ) The EA will address comments made during any public comment period.
( e ) The EA will briefly provide sufficient data and analysis for determining whether to prepare an EIS or a FONSI.
( f ) The EA will be reviewed by the NEPA compliance staff and other interested TVA entities, including TVA legal counsel.
( g ) After the EA is finalized and with the concurrence of TVA legal counsel, the NEPA compliance staff will make one of the following determinations: ( 1 ) A Finding of No Significant Impact,
( 2 ) The action requires the preparation of an EIS, or
( 3 ) The EA needs to be supplemented before the significance of potential impacts can be determined.
SERVED: AUGUST 8, 2014 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

WILLIAM LEVERANCE 

DOCKET NO. FAA-2014-0412 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2013S0150060) has been assigned to 

Administrative Law Judge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications 

regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other 

persons onthe attached Service List. 

C-c··; ~-···-'"!';:~~ 

nnie A. 

Chief A 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC--430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl 0001 

William Loren Leverance 

3000 Clarcona Road 

Apopka, FL 32703 

ONE COPY 

Rashawn Rich George, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel, AS0-7 

Federal Aviation Administration, Southern Region 

1701 Columbia A venue 

College Park, GA 30337 

TEL: 404-305-5200 

FAX: 404-305-5223 

Hon. J.E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department ofTransportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-6941 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0412 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence A venue, S. W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl 000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

-2-
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-21143 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CLIPBERTO VALENCIA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-98-CV-3081 USDC No. H-91-CR-39-04

-------------------- May 29, 2001 Before DAVIS, JONES, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Clipberto Valencia, federal prisoner #59055-079, appeals from the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, a petition that was construed as a motion for relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. We granted Valencia a certificate of appealability (COA) on the issue whether the expiration of the limitations period to seek relief pursuant to § 2255 may render § 2255 ineffective as an avenue of relief on claims raise pursuant to Bailey v. UnitedNo. 98-21143 -2- States , 516 U.S. 137 (1995), allowing Valencia to seek relief pursuant to § 2241. Bailey was decided in 1995, before the limitations period closed for Valencia to file a § 2255 motion. Valencia’s Bailey claim therefore was not foreclosed by existing law during the period when he could have filed a timely motion. The savings clause of § 2255 therefore did not apply to Valencia’s case, allowing him to proceed under § 2241. Reyes-Requena v. United States , ___ F.3d ___, No. 99-41254 (5th Cir. Feb. 28, 2001), 2001 WL 197931 at *10. AFFIRMED.
# C_2014045EN.01000402.xml

| 15.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 5 December 2013 — Caffaro Srl, placed under special administration v European Commission

(Case C-447/11 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - European market for hydrogen peroxide and sodium perborate - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Calculation of the fine - Duration of the infringement - Limitation period - Mitigating circumstances)

2014/C 45/07

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Caffaro Srl, placed under special administration (represented by: C. Biscaretti di Ruffia and E. Gambaro, lawyers)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: Di Bucci, L Malferrari, R. Striani and B. Gencarelli, agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 16 June 2011 in Case T-192/06 Caffaro v Commission by which the Court dismissed the action for partial annulment of Commission Decision C(2006) 1766 final of 3 May 2006 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/F/38.620 — Hydrogen peroxide and perborate) in so far as in it the Commission imposes a joint and several fine on the applicant and SNIA SpA, or a reduction of the fine — Fines — Equal treatment — Limitation period — Obligation to state reasons.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Caffaro Srl, placed under special administration, to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Caffaro Srl, placed under special administration, to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 311, 22.10.2011.

1

---
```

[113th Congress Public Law 208]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 128 STAT. 2075]]

Public Law 113-208
113th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
302 East Green Street in Champaign, Illinois, as the ``James R. Burgess 
   Jr. Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Dec. 16, 2014 -  [H.R. 1707]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. JAMES R. BURGESS JR. POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 302 East Green Street in Champaign, Illinois, shall be known 
and designated as the ``James R. Burgess Jr. Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``James R. 
Burgess Jr. Post Office Building''.

    Approved December 16, 2014.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 1707 (S. 796):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 160 (2014):
            June 17, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 8, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
### §6906. Matching requirements

#### (a) In general

Financial assistance under this chapter shall be matched with funds from sources other than the Federal Government on the basis of not less than 50 percent of each dollar provided by the Administration.

#### (b) Sources of matching funds

Fees, grants, gifts, funds from loan sources, and in-kind resources of a grant recipient from public or private sources may be used to comply with the matching requirement in subsection (a).

#### (c) Exception

#### (1) In general

In the case of an applicant for assistance under this chapter with severe constraints on available sources of matching funds, the Administrator may reduce or eliminate the matching requirements of subsection (a).

#### (2) Limitation

Not more than 10 percent of the total funds made available from the Administration in any fiscal year to carry out this chapter may be excepted from the matching requirements of subsection (a), as authorized by paragraph (1) of this subsection.

(Pub. L. 103–325, title I, §177, as added Pub. L. 106–102, title VII, §725, Nov. 12, 1999, 113 Stat. 1474.)
### §1154. Procurement of buoy chain

(a) Except as provided in subsection (b), the Coast Guard may not procure buoy chain—

(1) that is not manufactured in the United States; or

(2) substantially all of the components of which are not produced or manufactured in the United States.

(b) The Coast Guard may procure buoy chain that is not manufactured in the United States if the Secretary determines that—

(1) the price of buoy chain manufactured in the United States is unreasonable; or

(2) emergency circumstances exist.

(Added Pub. L. 104–324, title XI, §1128(a), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3984, §97; renumbered §1154, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §108(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4208.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 97 of this title as this section.
§ 35.44 Protections against affiliate cross-subsidization. ( a ) *Restriction on affiliate sales of electric energy.* No wholesale sale of electric energy may be made between a franchised public utility with captive customers and a market-regulated power sales affiliate without first receiving Commission authorization for the transaction under section 205 of the Federal Power Act. This requirement does not apply to energy sales from a qualifying facility, as defined by 18 CFR 292.101, made under market-based rate authority granted by the Commission.
( b ) *Non-power goods or services.* ( 1 ) Unless otherwise permitted by Commission rule or order, and except as permitted by paragraph (b)(4) of this section, sales of any non-power goods or services by a franchised public utility that has captive customers or that owns or provides transmission service over jurisdictional transmission facilities, including sales made to or through its affiliated exempt wholesale generators or qualifying facilities, to a market-regulated power sales affiliate or non-utility affiliate must be at the higher of cost or market price.
( 2 ) Unless otherwise permitted by Commission rule or order, and except as permitted by paragraphs (b)(3) and (b)(4) of this section, a franchised public utility that has captive customers or that owns or provides transmission service over jurisdictional transmission facilities, may not purchase or receive non-power goods and services from a market-regulated power sales affiliate or a non-utility affiliate at a price above market.
( 3 ) A franchised public utility that has captive customers or that owns or provides transmission service over jurisdictional transmission facilities, may only purchase or receive non-power goods and services from a centralized service company at cost.
( 4 ) A company in a single-state holding company system, as defined in § 366.3(c)(1) of this chapter, may provide general administrative and management non-power goods and services to, or receive such goods and services from, other companies in the same holding company system, at cost, provided that the only parties to transactions involving these non-power goods and services are affiliates or associate companies, as defined in § 366.1 of this chapter, of a holding company in the holding company system.
( c ) *Exemption for price under fuel adjustment clause regulations.* Where the price of fuel from a company-owned or controlled source is found or presumed under § 35.14 to be reasonable and includable in the adjustment clause, transactions involving that fuel shall be exempt from the affiliate price restrictions in § 35.44(b).
[73 FR 11025, Feb. 29, 2008, as amended by Order 707-A, 73 FR 43083, July 24, 2008]
#### § 1304.200 Scope and intent.

This subpart C applies to residential water-use facilities, specifically the construction of docks, piers, boathouses (fixed and floating), retaining walls, and other structures and alterations, including channel excavation and vegetation management, on or along TVA-owned residential access shoreland. TVA manages the TVA-owned residential access shoreland to conserve, protect, and enhance shoreland resources, while providing reasonable access to the water of the reservoir by qualifying adjacent residents.
§ 320.2 Place of maintenance of records. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, any person engaged in any business described in § 320.1 and required by this part to keep records must maintain such records at the place where such business is conducted, except that if such person conducts such business at multiple locations, he may maintain such records at his headquarters' office. When not in actual use, all such records must be kept in a safe place at the prescribed location in accordance with good commercial practices.
( b ) Records required to kept under § 320.1(b)(4) must be kept at the location where the raw beef was ground.
[80 FR 79250, Dec. 21, 2015]
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 534 

To prohibit certain funds from being transferred or reprogrammed to plan, 

develop, or construct a new physical barrier along the southwest border, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2019 

Ms. WARREN (for herself, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mr. SANDERS, 

Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Mr. MENENDEZ, and Ms. HARRIS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit certain funds from being transferred or reprogrammed to plan, develop, or construct a new physical 

barrier along the southwest border, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Disaster 

5 Relief Funds Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 534 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USE OF CERTAIN FUNDS FOR A 

2 NEW PHYSICAL BARRIER ALONG THE SOUTH3 WEST BORDER. 

4 Notwithstanding any other provision of law— 

5 (1) none of the funds appropriated or otherwise 

6 made available to the Department of Homeland Se7 curity or the Department of Housing and Urban De8 velopment under the Continuing Appropriations Act, 

9 2018 and Supplemental Appropriations for Disaster 

10 Relief Requirements Act, 2017 (Public Law 115– 

11 56), the Additional Supplemental Appropriations for 

12 Disaster Relief Requirements Act, 2017 (Public Law 

13 115–72), the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 (Public 

14 Law 115–123), or the FAA Reauthorization Act of 

15 2018 (Public Law 115–254) for activities relating to 

16 disaster relief or recovery may be transferred or re17 programmed to plan, develop, or construct a new 

18 physical barrier along the southwest border of the 

19 United States; and 

20 (2) none of the funds appropriated or otherwise 

21 made available to the Corps of Engineers under the 

22 Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 (Public Law 115– 

23 123) may be transferred or reprogrammed under 

24 section 923 of the Water Resources Development 

25 Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2293). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
# C_2011232EN.01002305.xml

| 6.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 232/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 232/23

---

Order of the President of the Court of 17 May 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Minister van Financiën v G. in ‘t Veld

(Case C-110/11) (1)

(2011/C 232/40)

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 160, 28.5.2011.

---
#### § 292.401 Implementation of certain reporting requirements.

Any electric utility which fails to comply with the requirements of § 292.302(b) shall be subject to the same penalties to which it may be subjected for failure to comply with the requirements of the Commission's regulations issued under section 133 of PURPA.

[45 FR 12236, Feb. 25, 1980. Redesignated by Order 541, 57 FR 21734, May 22, 1992]