alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 332.7 Federal oversight of a cooperative interstate shipment program. ( a ) The FSIS selected establishment coordinator for a State that has entered into an agreement for a cooperative interstate shipment program will visit each selected establishment in the State on a regular basis to verify that the establishment is operating in a manner that is consistent with the Act and the implementing regulations in this chapter. The frequency with which the SEC will visit selected establishments under the SEC's jurisdiction will be based on factors that include, but are not limited to, the complexity of the operations conducted at the selected establishment, the establishment's schedule of operations, and the establishment's performance under the cooperative interstate shipment program. If necessary, the selected establishment coordinator, in consultation with the District Manager that covers the State, may designate qualified FSIS personnel to visit a selected establishment on behalf of the selected establishment coordinator.
( b ) The selected establishment coordinator, in coordination with the State, will verify that selected establishments in the State are receiving the necessary inspection services from designated personnel, and that these establishments are eligible, and remain eligible, to participate in a cooperative interstate shipment program. The selected establishment coordinator's verification activities may include: ( 1 ) Verifying that each selected establishment employs, and continues to employ, 25 or fewer employees, on average, as required under § 332.3(a) of this part, unless the establishment is transitioning to become an official establishment;
( 2 ) Verifying that the designated personnel are providing inspection services to selected establishments in a manner that complies with the Act and the implementing regulations in this chapter;
( 3 ) Verifying that that the State staffing levels for each selected establishments are appropriate to carry out the required inspection activities; and
( 4 ) Assessing each selected establishment's compliance with the Act and implementing regulations under this chapter.
( c ) If the selected establishment coordinator determines that designated personnel are providing inspection services to selected establishments in the State in a manner that is inconsistent with the Act and the implementing regulations in this chapter, the Administrator will provide an opportunity for the State to develop and implement a corrective action plan to address inspection deficiencies identified by the selected establishment coordinator. If the State fails to develop a corrective action plan, or the selected establishment coordinator for the State determines that the corrective action plan is inadequate, the Administrator will terminate the agreement for the cooperative interstate shipment program as provided in § 321.3(d) of this chapter.
#### § 94.27 [Reserved]
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Service Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Pamela J. Montpelier, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-B (Item 601(b)(32)) promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Securities Act) and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act). In accordance with clause
(ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|/s/ PAMELA J. MONTPELIER                    
|Pamela J. Montpelier Chief Executive
Officer
|                                            
|February 10, 2006
Exhibit 99.1



To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
of Winners Entertainment, Inc.

We have audited the consolidated  financial statements of Winners Entertainment,
Inc.  and  subsidiaries  as of December  31, 1995 and 1994,  and for each of the
three years in the period ended  December  31, 1995,  and have issued our report
thereon dated April 5, 1996; such consolidated  report is included  elsewhere in
this Registration Statement. Our audits also included the consolidated financial
statement  schedule  of  Winners  Entertainment,  Inc.  and  subsidiaries.  This
consolidated  financial  statement  schedule is the  responsibility of Company's
management.  Our  responsibility  is to express an opinion on this  consolidated
financial statement schedule based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial
statement  schedule,  when  considered  in  relation  to the basic  consolidated
financial statements taken as a whole,  presents fairly in all material respects
the information set forth therein.

                                                               /s/CORBIN & WERTZ
                                                               Corbin & Wertz


Irvine, California
April 5, 1996
    



<PAGE>



   
                SCHEDULE II -- VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
    
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>



                                             Balance At                                               Balance at
                                             Beginning of                                             End of
                                             Period               Additions         Deductions        Period
                                             ------               ---------         ----------        ------

Year ended, December 31, 1995 (1):

<S>                                          <C>                  <C>               <C>    <C>        <C>       
Provision for doubtful notes                 $       --           $  290,000        $    --(1)        $  290,000
receivable

Allowance for deferred tax                   $6,868,000           $1,592,000        $    --           $8,460,000
assets                                       ----------           ----------                           -    --           ----------
                                          
                                             $6,868,000           $1,882,000        $    --           $8,750,000


Year ended, December 31, 1994(1):

Allowance for deferred tax                   $3,467,000           $3,401,000        $    --           $6,868,000
assets



Year ended, December 31, 1993(1)

Allowance for deferred tax                   $1,079,000           $2,388,000        $    --           $3,467,000
assets

</TABLE>


   
(1)    During each of the years reported, allowances for trade receivables were
         not significant.
August 13,20)0 

TRANSPORTATION 

"•"KnT OPERATIONS 

m Of!" ^! A 0: 25 

Ms. Susan Kurland 

Assistant Secretary for Aviation & International Affairs, X-1 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE W88-324 

Washington, DC 20590 

Subject: Small Community Air Service Development Grant Application 

Docket OST-2010-0124 

Columbia Metropolitan Airport - Colombia, SC 

Dear Ms. Kurland: 

As the Mayor of Irmo, SC, I strongly support the air service proposal detailed in the 

Small Community Air Service Development Program grant application. Commercial air 

service at Columbia Metropolitan Airport is vital to economic development in the 

midlands of South Carolina. Air travel plays an important role in support of tourism, 

education, government and business. This program should also help support the many 

programs at Fort Jackson, which is the major basic training facility for the US Army, as 

well as many other programs. 

Future community growth of the Columbia community depends, in part, on the airport's 

ability to meet the needs of existing local businesses as well as companies considering 

Columbia as a location for their operations. The proposal to support improved air service 

will greatly improve our ability to remain competitive in the global marketplace, which is 

the basis for supporting the local p:conomy and attracting new businesses and residents to 

the area. 

The Columbia Metropolitan Airport has forged strong ties with the business community 

to retain and improve local air service. We appreciate the opportunity to expand that 

partnership to include the U.S. Departoient of Transportation through the Small 

Community Air Service Development Program. 

John Gibbons, Mayor 

Town of Lexington 

P.O. Box 406 • 7300 Woodrow Street • Irmo, S.C. 29063*0406 • (803) 781-7050 * Fax: (803) 749-2743
#### § 8.1 Applicable law and regulations.

The provisions of subpart G, title 5, United States Code and implementing regulations for the Executive Branch covering compensation for work injuries, retirement, unemployment compensation, life insurance, and health insurance apply to Government Accountability Office employees.

[45 FR 68380, Oct. 15, 1980, as amended at 47 FR 56979, Dec. 22, 1982]
Creation Date Mon Jun  1, 1998  04:04 PM                            Page    1
CMB96A

From: The Chase Manhattan Bank

To:   Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.


                   MONTHLY CERTIFICATEHOLDER'S REPORT
                   ----------------------------------

Due Period 28 Beginning Date                     05/01/1998
Due Period 28 End Date                           05/31/1998
Determination Date                               06/10/1998
Remittance Date                                  06/15/1998


I.    Monthly Principal and Principal Carryover Shortfall to Certificateholders
      (Per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                  $ 17.4526664445

II.   Monthly Interest and Unpaid Interest to Certificateholders
      (Per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                   $ 1.2709788067

III.  Monthly Expenses Summary

      A. Servicing Fee Disbursement                                $ 360,338.08
      B. Cash Collateral Account Expense                                 $ 0.00
      C. Total Expenses paid
         (per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                $ 0.2444190034

IV.   Cash Collateral Account Deposit Amount                             $ 0.00

V.    Outstanding Advance Summary

      A. From Prior Period                                       $ 3,918,673.34
      B. From Current Period                                     $ 4,054,097.81
      C. Change in Amount Between Periods (Lines B - A)            $ 135,424.47

VI.   Pool Factor Information

      A. Certificate Principal Balance                         $ 406,675,859.13
      B. Initial Certificate Balance                         $ 1,474,263,764.33
      C. Pool Factor (Lines A / B)                               0.275850135484

VII.  Available Cash Collateral Account Information for Due Period

      A. Available Cash Collateral Amount                       $ 21,620,284.64
      B. Available Cash Collateral Amount Percentage            4.999999999306%

VIII. Required Cash Collateral Amount

      A. For the Current Collection Period                      $ 21,620,284.64
      B. For the Next Collection Period                         $ 20,333,792.96
### §327. Employees for conduct of meteorological investigations in Arctic region; appointment and compensation; extra compensation to other Government employees for taking observations

The Secretary of Commerce is authorized to (a) appoint employees for the conduct of meteorological investigations in the Arctic region without regard to the civil service laws and fix their compensation without regard to chapter 51 and subchapter III of chapter 53 of title 5, and sections 5542, 5543, 5545, and 5546 of title 5, at base rates not to exceed the maximum scheduled rate for GS–12, and (b) grant extra compensation to employees of other Government agencies for taking and transmitting meteorological observations without regard to section 5533 of title 5.

(June 2, 1948, ch. 373, §3, 62 Stat. 286; Pub. L. 86–397, §2, Mar. 28, 1960, 74 Stat. 11; Pub. L. 88–448, title IV, §401(m), Aug. 19, 1964, 78 Stat. 491.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

In this section, "chapter 51 and subchapter III of chapter 53 of title 5", "sections 5542, 5543, 5545, and 5546 of title 5", and "section 5533 of title 5" substituted for "the Classification Act of 1949, as amended (5 U.S.C. 1071 and the following)", "titles II and III of the Federal Employees Pay Act of 1945, as amended (5 U.S.C. 911 and the following)", and "section 301 of the Dual Compensation Act", respectively, on authority of Pub. L. 89–554, §7(b), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 631, the first section of which enacted Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### Amendments

1964—Pub. L. 88–448 inserted "without regard to section 5533 of title 5".

1960—Pub. L. 86–397 substituted "Secretary of Commerce" for "Weather Bureau", authorized the Secretary to fix the compensation of the employees, and limited the base rates to not more than the maximum scheduled rate for GS–12.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1964 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 88–448 effective on first day of first month which begins later than ninetieth day following Aug. 19, 1964, see section 403 of Pub. L. 88–448.
# C_2010301EN.01001001.xml

| 6.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/10

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 19 August 2010 — Société Veleclair v Ministre du budget, des comptes publics et de la réforme de l’État

(Case C-414/10)

()

2010/C 301/13

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Société Veleclair

Applicant:

Defendant: Ministre du budget, des comptes publics et de la réforme de l’État

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Does Article 17(2)(b) of the Sixth Directive (1) permit a Member State to make the right to deduct value added tax on importation conditional, regard being had in particular to the risk of tax evasion, upon the actual payment of that tax by the taxable person, where the taxable person for the purposes of value added tax on importation and the holder of the corresponding right to deduction are, as in France, the same person?

1

---

(1)  Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1).

1

---
Opinion issued March 14, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-11-01104-CV

———————————

JOSEPH MILLS AND KATY MILLS, Appellants

V.

US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCATION, AS TRUSTEE OF THE RASC 

2006KS5 TRUST, Appellee

On Appeal from the 80th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1125950

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The parties have filed a “Joint Motion for Summary Reversal and Remand 

Based on Intervening Texas Supreme Court Decision in Wood v. HSBC Bank USA, 

N.A., 505 S.W.3d 542 (2016).” The parties jointly “request that this Court 
2

summarily reverse the District Court’s decision in light of Wood, and remand the 

case to the District Court for further proceedings.” Because both parties are asking 

this Court to reverse the trial court’s judgment, we grant the joint motion. See 

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.1.

We reverse the trial court’s judgment and remand for further proceedings. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(d).

The Clerk is directed to issue the mandate within 10 days of the date of this 

opinion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 18.1.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Goodman and Countiss.
### §2938. Relation to other authorities

#### (a) National Climate Program research activities

The President, the Chairman of the Council, and the Secretary of Commerce shall ensure that relevant research activities of the National Climate Program, established by the National Climate Program Act (15 U.S.C. 2901 et seq.), are considered in developing national global change research efforts.

#### (b) Availability of research findings

The President, the Chairman of the Council, and the heads of the agencies and departments represented on the Committee, shall ensure that the research findings of the Committee, and of Federal agencies and departments, are available to—

(1) the Environmental Protection Agency for use in the formulation of a coordinated national policy on global climate change pursuant to section 1103 of the Global Climate Protection Act of 1987 (15 U.S.C. 2901 note); and

(2) all Federal agencies and departments for use in the formulation of coordinated national policies for responding to human-induced and natural processes of global change pursuant to other statutory responsibilities and obligations.

#### (c) Effect on Federal response actions

Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed, interpreted, or applied to preclude or delay the planning or implementation of any Federal action designed, in whole or in part, to address the threats of stratospheric ozone depletion or global climate change.

(Pub. L. 101–606, title I, §108, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3101.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The National Climate Program Act, referred to in subsec. (a), is Pub. L. 95–367, Sept. 17, 1978, 92 Stat. 601, which is classified principally to chapter 56 (§2901 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2901 of this title and Tables.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350,CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE**

 

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 ofTitle 18, United States Code), the undersigned officers of Corgenix MedicalCorporation, a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify withrespect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities an ExchangeCommission (the “10-Q Report”) that:

 

i.        the10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

ii.     the information contained in the 10-Q Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

Dated:             February 12, 2009

 

**This Certification is made solely forpurposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standardcontained therein, and not for any other purpose.**

 

**A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request. This written statement shall notbe deemed to be “filed” as part of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q thatit accompanies.**

 
| /s/  Douglass T. Simpson                           |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| President  and Chief Executive Officer             |   |
|                                               |   |
| /s/  William H. Critchfield                        |   |
| Senior  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 49 (Monday, March 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 13616]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5836]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[Docket<greek-i> EPA-RO4-SFUND-2011-0201, FRL-9280-3]


Picayune Wood Treating Site Picayune, Pearl River County, MS; 
Notice of Settlement

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice of settlement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under Section 122(h)(1) of the Comprehensive Environmental 
Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), the United States 
Environmental Protection Agency has entered into a settlement for 
reimbursement of past response costs concerning the Picayune Wood 
Treating Site located in Picayune, Pearl River County, Mississippi for 
publication.

DATES: The Agency will consider public comments on the settlement until 
April 13, 2011. The Agency will consider all comments received and may 
modify or withdraw its consent to the settlement if comments received 
disclose facts or considerations which indicate that the settlement is 
inappropriate, improper, or inadequate.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the settlement are available from Ms. Paula V. 
Painter. Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-RO4-
SFUND-2011-0201 or Site name Picayune Wood Treating Superfund Site by 
one of the following methods:
    <bullet> http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line 
instructions for submitting comments.
    <bullet> http://www.epa.gov/region4/waste/sf/enforce.htm.
    <bullet> E-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f4a4959d9a809186daa495819895b4918495da939b82"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f6a6979f98829384d8a697839a97b6938697d8919980">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paula V. Painter at 404/562-8887.

    Dated: February 24, 2011.
Anita L. Davis,
Chief, Superfund Enforcement & Information Management Branch, Superfund 
Division.
[FR Doc. 2011-5836 Filed 3-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Jupiter Marine
International Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly
period ending January 27, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lawrence Tierney, Principal
Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


By: /s/ Lawrence Tierney
    ----------------------------
    Lawrence Tierney
    Principal Accounting Officer
    July 17, 2003