alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011055EN.01003301.xml

| 19.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/33

---

Appeal brought on 21 December 2010 by Luigi Marcuccio against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 6 October 2010 in Case F-2/10, Marcuccio v Commission

(Case T-594/10 P)

2011/C 55/59

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Other party to the proceedings:

Form of order sought by the appellant

Form of order sought by the appellant

| — | In any event, set aside in its entirety and without exception the order under appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

In any event, set aside in its entirety and without exception the order under appeal.

| — | Declare that the action at first instance, in relation to which the order under appeal was made, was perfectly admissible. |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that the action at first instance, in relation to which the order under appeal was made, was perfectly admissible.

| — | Allow in its entirety and without any exception whatsoever the relief sought by the appellant at first instance. |
| --- | --- |

—

Allow in its entirety and without any exception whatsoever the relief sought by the appellant at first instance.

| — | Order the Commission to reimburse the appellant in respect of all costs, disbursements and fees incurred by him in relation to both the proceedings at first instance and the present appeal proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to reimburse the appellant in respect of all costs, disbursements and fees incurred by him in relation to both the proceedings at first instance and the present appeal proceedings.

| — | In the alternative, refer the case back to the Civil Service Tribunal, sitting in a different formation, for a fresh decision. |
| --- | --- |

—

In the alternative, refer the case back to the Civil Service Tribunal, sitting in a different formation, for a fresh decision.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The present appeal is brought against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal (CST) of 6 October 2010. That order dismissed as partly manifestly inadmissible and partly unfounded an action directed against the Commission’s refusal of his request for 100 % reimbursement of medical expenses relating to the illness from which he suffers.

In support of his appeal, the appellant submits that the findings concerning the object of the action and its admissibility were unlawful.

The appellant also alleges incorrect and unreasonable interpretation and application of Articles 90 and 91 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of Civil Service Tribunal, a total failure to state reasons and failure to give a ruling on claim made by the appellant.

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alliance Laundry Systems LLC, Alliance Laundry Corporation and
Alliance Laundry Holdings LLC (the Companies) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bruce P. Rounds, Vice President, and
Chief Financial Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|/s/ BRUCE P. ROUNDS                       
|Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

May 10, 2006
BEFORE SHE GETS BEHIND 

THE WHEEL...

Make sure she understands the risks of drunk and 

drugged driving.

Let your child know it’s never okay to get behind the wheel of a 

motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or other drugs, 

and that getting in a car with someone who has been drinking 

or using drugs is also very dangerous. For tips on how—and 

when—to begin the conversation, visit 

www.underagedrinking.samhsa.gov

#TalkTheyHearYou PEP20-03-01-060
# C_2012331EN.01000802.xml

| 27.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/8

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 September 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) — Maurice Robert Josse Marie Ghislain Lippens, Gilbert Georges Henri Mittler, Jean Paul François Caroline Votron v Hendrikus Cornelis Kortekaas, Kortekaas Entertainment Marketing BV, Kortekaas Pensioen BV, Dirk Robbard De Kat, Johannes Hendrikus Visch, Euphemia Joanna Bökkerink, Laminco GLD N-A, Ageas NV, formerly Fortis NV

(Case C-170/11) (1)

(Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001 - Cooperation in the taking of evidence in civil and commercial matters - Matters covered - Hearing by the court of a Member State of a witness who is a party in the main proceedings residing in another Member State - Possibility to summon a party as a witness before the competent court in accordance with the law of its Member State)

(2012/C 331/12)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Maurice Robert Josse Marie Ghislain Lippens, Gilbert Georges Henri Mittler, Jean Paul François Caroline Votron

Defendants: Hendrikus Cornelis Kortekaas, Kortekaas Entertainment Marketing BV, Kortekaas Pensioen BV, Dirk Robbard De Kat, Johannes Hendrikus Visch, Euphemia Joanna Bökkerink, Laminco GLD N-A, Ageas NV, formerly Fortis NV

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Interpretation of Article 1(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001 of 28 May 2001 on cooperation between the courts of the Member States in the taking of evidence in civil or commercial matters (OJ 2001 L 174, p. 1) — Score — Hearing of witnesses by Netherlands courts of witnesses who are also parties to the main proceedings but not resident in the Netherlands — Domestic procedural law

Operative part of the judgment

The provisions of Council Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001 of 28 May 2001 on cooperation between the courts of the Member States in the taking of evidence in civil or commercial matters, in particular Article 1(1) thereof, must be interpreted as meaning that the competent court of a Member State which wishes to hear as a witness a party residing in another Member State, has the option, in order to perform such a hearing, to summon that party before it and hear him in accordance with the law of its Member State.

---

(1)  OJ C 179, 18.6.2011.

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 239 (Tuesday, December 13, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 90043]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-29759]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Twenty Sixth RTCA SC-214 Standards for Air Traffic Data 
Communications Services Plenary

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Twenty Sixth RTCA SC-214 Standards for Air Traffic Data 
Communications Services Plenary.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of Twenty Sixth RTCA SC-214 Standards for Air Traffic Data 
Communications Services Plenary.

DATES: The meeting will be held February 27, 2017--11:00 a.m.-12:00 
p.m.

ADDRESS: The meeting will be held at: Virtually at https://rtca.webex.com/rtca/j.php?MTID=m41a5c4b792b9ffbcee3f96c684dc6c2b, Join 
by phone, 1-877-668-4493, Call-in toll-free number (US/Canada), Access 
code: 632 268 506, Meeting password: Sc214#26!.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karan Hofmann at khofmann@rtca.org or 
202-330-0680, or The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street NW., Suite 910, 
Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 833-9339, fax at (202) 
833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of the Twenty Sixth RTCA SC-214 Standards 
for Air Traffic Data Communications Services Plenary. The agenda will 
include the following:

Monday, February 27, 2017--11:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m.

1. Welcome and Administrative Remarks
2. Introductions
3. Agenda Review
4. Meeting-Minutes Review
5. Terms of Reference (TOR) Revision Discussion
6. Approve TOR Revision
7. Any other Business
8. Date and Place of Next Meeting
9. Adjourn
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC on December 7, 2016.
Mohannad Dawoud,
Management & Program Analyst, Partnership Contracts Branch, ANG-A17 
NextGen, Procurement Services Division, Federal Aviation 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2016-29759 Filed 12-12-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23



                       Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement 
(Form S-8 No. 33-76298) pertaining to the 1993 Equity Incentive Plan and the 
1993 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors of AFC Cable Systems, 
Inc., the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-83420) pertaining to the 
401 (k) Savings and Profit Sharing Plans, the Registration Statement (Form 
S-8 No. 33-28313) pertaining to the 1997 Equity Incentive Plan of AFC Cable 
Systems, Inc., and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-59373) 
pertaining to the 1998 Equity Incentive Plan of AFC Cable Systems, Inc. of 
our report dated February 17, 1999, with respect to the consolidated 
financial statements and schedule of AFC Cable Systems, Inc. included in the 
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998.


                                         ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Providence, Rhode Island
March 25, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000835541
<NAME> SOLECTRON CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-27-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-27-1999
<CASH>                                       1,325,637
<SECURITIES>                                   362,769
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,123,901
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,580
<INVENTORY>                                  1,080,083
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,994,084
<PP&E>                                       1,186,885
<DEPRECIATION>                                 533,311
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,834,696
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,113,186
<BONDS>                                        922,653
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           271
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,792,820
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,834,696
<SALES>                                      8,391,409
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,391,409
<CGS>                                        7,614,589
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,614,589
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               335,808
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,143
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              36,479
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                432,342
<INCOME-TAX>                                   138,407
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            293,935
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   293,935
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.13


</TABLE>
#### § 590.126 Overtime inspection service.

When operations in an official plant require the services of inspection personnel beyond their regularly assigned tour of duty on any day or on a day outside the established schedule, such services are considered as overtime work. The official plant must give reasonable advance notice to the inspector of any overtime service necessary and must pay for such overtime. For each calendar year, FSIS will calculate the overtime rate for inspection service, per hour per program employee, using the following formula: The quotient of dividing the Office of Field Operations plus Office of International Affairs inspection program personnel's previous fiscal year's regular direct pay by the previous fiscal year's regular hours, plus the quotient multiplied by the calendar year's percentage of cost of living increase, multiplied by 1.5, plus the benefits rate, plus the travel and operating rate, plus the overhead rate, plus the allowance for bad debt rate. FSIS calculates the benefits rate, the travel and operating rate, the overhead rate, and the allowance for bad debt rate using the formulas set forth in § 592.510(b) and the cost of living increases and percentage of inflation factors set forth in § 592.510(c) of this chapter.

[71 FR 2143, Jan. 13, 2006, as amended at 76 FR 20228, Apr. 12, 2011]
P.1 

OAR Box 1802 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

57) IV-E-52 

Docket Number: 

A-90-37 

Printed 11/4/2008 11:57:59 AM Sheet 57 of 117 
P.2 

A-lo-a^ 

Date: April 14,2000 

To: Air and Radiation Docket # A-90-37 

From: Tom Driscoll, Integrated Implementation Group, 

ITPID, MD-12 

Subject: Meeting with Complex Manufacturers Group \ •—cpfv^'^j"-

On March 10,2000, the EPA met with representatives of a group of complex 

manufacturers (attendee list is attached). The first half of the discussion focused primarily on the 

clean unit test in EPA's July 1996 NSR Reform rulemaking proposal. Some of the topics 

covered included the time by which technology must be applied, the duration of the exemption 

under the test, case-by-case determinations for eligibility for the exemption, and defining what 

kinds of controls could qualify for the clean unit exemption. During the second part of the 

meeting, industry representatives presented and defined what they perceived as problems under 

the current NSR program including issues associated with what changes constitute a project, 

changes that debottleneck a process, and units whose operations are linked. 

Attachment 

cc: Jon Devine, OGC 

Pam Smith (MD-12) 

,M'-"-2T 
P.3 

b Crc Lr. 

Ih.bwt-s. .Low 

:.:.T"\G.'oZA4 .^2KO.n.cJLvGl <t) 

. :l'T°vvs. .Qr."\£.c&\Q...... 

•^rbc^.jP-t^e... 

"IAmm*VLC* OOlmflCS 

V^Bi'l•..Z-r:^'l> 

&VX, 

fc 

TZffrl^cA- \...2<?Jtj.J ^ ^ — r

l

-

x

£>c>

:&D.&./oft£fa.m*i\'- 2-^ $.(*,y zLb.b.M 

.--. B^/.D^Q..RS ^i^-^vv-c-^-^ 

:

 ...BfAlQMrs.:, S.3J* 

^c6^^/^^/^ny^- ^-02/^37:^675 

..6£,.±:/9.fiF ._.... ...... :?^r.*.^-*^>: 

'Zc-2m9-%^§£<ri-ttsz 

T-*V YVK ?£v y 

_^/f -2.27-203 J ..fkffer. C&tinht. 

^
§ 22.19 Findings and Decisions of the Board [Rule 19]. ( a ) *Generally.* All proceedings shall be concluded and appeals disposed of as expeditiously as possible, commensurate with sound adjudicatory procedure. The findings and decision in each appeal shall be made by the members of the panel which considered that appeal, and the findings and decision of the majority thereof shall constitute the findings and decision of the Board. The absence or withdrawal of one member of the panel which considered that appeal shall not invalidate the proceedings, and the decision of the remaining panel members shall constitute the decision of the Board. All decisions and findings of the Board shall be made in writing and copies thereof shall be forwarded to the parties or their counsel.
( b ) *Record upon which findings and decisions are based.* ( 1 ) The record upon which any decision of the Board will be rendered consists of the following: ( i ) Notice of appeal;
( ii ) Pleadings, motions, written briefs and statements, and responses thereto;
( iii ) Rule 4 file and any supplements other than those to which an objection has been sustained;
( iv ) Hearing exhibits other than those to which an objection has been sustained;
( v ) Orders, rulings, and directions to the parties issued by the Board;
( vi ) Written transcripts and electronic recordings of proceedings;
( vii ) Stipulations, party admissions, depositions or parts thereof received in evidence, and written interrogatories and responses received in evidence;
( viii ) Anything else that the Board may designate.
( 2 ) All other documents and electronically stored information are part of the administrative record of the proceedings and are not included in the record upon which the Board's decision will be rendered.
# C_2012303EN.01000401.xml

| 6.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/4

---

Order of the Court of 3 May 2012 — World Wide Tobacco España, SA v European Commission

(Case C-240/11 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Competition - Agreements, decisions or concerted practices - The Spanish market for the purchase and first processing of raw tobacco - Price-fixing and market-sharing - Fines - Deterrent effect - Equal treatment - Mitigating circumstances - Maximum limit of 10 % of turnover - Cooperation)

2012/C 303/05

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Appellant: World Wide Tobacco España, SA (represented by: M. Odriozola and A. Vide, abogados)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: E. Gippini Fournier and L. Malferrari, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 March 2011 in Case T-37/05 World Wide Tobacco España v Commission by which the General Court rejected in part an application for a reduction in the amount of the fine imposed on the applicant in Commission Decision C(2004) 4030 final, of 20 October 2004, relating to a proceeding under Article 81(1) (EC) (Case COMP/C.38.238/B.2 — Raw tobacco — Spain)

World Wide Tobacco España

Commission

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The main appeal and the additional appeal are dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The main appeal and the additional appeal are dismissed.

| 2. | World Wide Tobacco España, SA is ordered to pay the costs of the main appeal. |
| --- | --- |

2.

World Wide Tobacco España, SA is ordered to pay the costs of the main appeal.

| 3. | The European Commission is ordered to pay the costs of the additional appeal. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The European Commission is ordered to pay the costs of the additional appeal.

---

(1)  OJ C 211, 16.7.2011.

1

---
**Exhibit 31.1****Chief Executive Officer Certification**I, John G. Duffy, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q forthe quarter ended March 31, 2007 of KBW, Inc. (the “Registrant”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) [Intentionally omitted.]  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of theRegistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in theRegistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theRegistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.   Date: May 11, 2007     /s/ JOHN G. DUFFY John G. DuffyChief Executive Officer
### Part A—State Programs