alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.61

 

AMENDMENT TO OCTOBER 2, 2015 STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT

 

This Amendment, effective as of October 2, 2015, between Rockwell Medical, Inc. (the “Company”) and Robert L. Chioini (the “Optionee”).

 

WHEREAS, the October 2, 2015 resolutions of the Compensation Committee authorizing the October 2, 2015 Tranche B grant of 275,000 options (the “Tranche B Options”) to Optionee provide that the related option agreement shall state that such options are not intended to be exempt from Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986;

 

WHEREAS, this Amendment is being executed in accordance with the authorizing resolutions for the Tranche B Options in order to modify the grant agreement, dated as of October 2, 2015 (the “Tranche B Grant Agreement”);

 

NOW THEREFORE, the Tranche B Grant Agreement is amended as follows:

 

1.                                      Section 1.1 is amended to add the following at the end of such section:

 

The Option is not intended to satisfy the requirements of or be exempt from Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

 

2.                                      Except as specifically modified herein, the remaining provisions of the Tranche B Grant Agreement remain in full force and effect.

 

3.                                      This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, all of which shall constitute one and the same Amendment.  This Amendment may be executed by signatures delivered by facsimile or electronic mail, each of which shall be fully binding on the signing party.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have caused this Amendment to be duly executed as of the date set forth above.

 

	
ROBERT L. CHIOINI, as Optionee
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/ Robert L. Chioini
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
ROCKWELL MEDICAL, INC.
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
/s/ Thomas E. Klema
    	
 
    
	
Thomas E. Klema
    	
 
    
	
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and   Treasurer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Dominic Mainella, Jr., Appellant.

[823 NYS2d 751]

Motion for writ of error coram nobis denied. Present—Scudder, J.E, Gorski, Smith and Green, JJ.
§ 1318.603 Public notice. ( a ) Once a determination of no practicable alternative is made in accordance with § 1318.602, the initiating office must notify the public of a proposed action's potential impact on floodplains or wetlands if the proposed action is subject to executive order and not already covered by class review. Public notice of actions affecting floodplains or wetlands may be combined with any notice published by TVA or another Federal agency if such a notice generally meets the minimum requirements set forth in this section. Issuance of a draft or final EA or EIS for public review and comment will satisfy this notice requirement.
( b ) Public notices must at a minimum: ( 1 ) Briefly describe the proposed action and the potential impact on the floodplain or wetland;
( 2 ) Briefly identify alternative actions considered and explain why a determination of no practicable alternative has been proposed;
( 3 ) Briefly discuss measures that would be taken to minimize or mitigate floodplain or wetland impacts;
( 4 ) State when appropriate whether the action conforms to applicable Federal, State or local floodplain protection standards;
( 5 ) Specify a reasonable period of time within which the public can comment on the proposal; and
( 6 ) Identify the TVA official who can provide additional information on the proposed action and to whom comments should be sent.
( c ) Such notices must be issued in a manner designed to bring the proposed action to the attention of those members of the public likely to be interested in or affected by the action's potential impact on the floodplain or wetland.
( d ) TVA must consider all relevant and timely comments received in response to a notice and reevaluate the action as appropriate to take such comments into consideration before the proposed action is implemented.
§ 157.207 General reporting requirements. On or before May 1, or each year, or in the case of emergency reconstruction activity, prior to any activity, the certificate holder must file, in the manner prescribed in §§ 157.6(a) and 385.2011 of this chapter, an annual report signed under oath by a senior official of the company, that lists for the previous calendar year: ( a ) For each new facility authorized by §§ 157.208, 157.210, 157.212, or 157.213, the information specified in § 157.208(e);
( b ) For each delivery point authorized under § 157.211(a)(1), the information required by § 157.211(c);
( c ) for each temporary compressor facility under § 157.209, the information required by § 157.209(b);
( d ) For each storage project tested or developed under § 157.215, the information specified in § 157.215(b)(1);
( e ) For each abandonment authorized under § 157.216(a), the information specified in § 157.216(d);
( f ) For each change in rate schedule authorized under § 157.217, the information specified in § 157.217(b);
( g ) For each change in customer name authorized under § 157.218, the information specified in § 157.218(b); and
( h ) If any activity required to be reported under this section was not undertaken, a statement to that effect.
[Order 436, 50 FR 42490, Oct. 18, 1985, as amended by Order 493, 53 FR 15030, Apr. 27, 1988; Order 603, 64 FR 26607, May 14, 1999; Order 603, 66 FR 15347, Mar. 19, 2001; Order 633, 68 FR 31605, May 28, 2003; Order 686, 71 FR 63693, Oct. 31, 2006; Order 686-A, 72 FR 37436, July 10, 2007]
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

(X)   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

      For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2012

                                             or

( )   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______ to _______

Commission file number        0-17679
BOSTON CAPITAL TAX CREDIT FUND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

   We consent to the incorporation by reference in (1) the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-86749) pertaining to 1,975,000
shares of Dial-Thru International Corporation (formerly ARDIS Telecom &
Technologies, Inc.) common stock issuable pursuant to its Amended Stock Option
Plan and certain compensation contracts, and (2) the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-23313) pertaining to 1,200,000 shares of Dial-
Thru International Corporation (formerly ARDIS Telecom & Technologies, Inc.)
common stock issuable pursuant to its Amended Stock Option Plan, and (3) the
Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-33523) pertaining to
863,364 shares of Dial-Thru International Corporation (formerly ARDIS Telecom &
Technologies, Inc.) common stock, of our report dated January 7, 2000, with
respect to the financial statements of Dial-Thru International Corporation and
Subsidiaries for the year ended October 31, 1999.

                                          /s/ KING GRIFFIN & ADAMSON P.C.

                                          King Griffin & Adamson P.C.

Dallas, Texas
January 27, 2000
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Gilman + Ciocia, Inc. (the
"Company") for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004, as amended by this Form
10K/A, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"),I, Michael P. Ryan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

By: /s/ Michael P. Ryan
    --------------------------
Name: Michael P. Ryan
      Chief Executive Officer

Date: June 15, 2006
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 13, 2014

N o. 04

- 13

- 00882

- CV

Joseph ZAPATA and Maria Banda,

Appellant s

v.

WALTER MORTGAGE COMPANY LLC, ET AL.,

Appellees

From the 79th Judicial District Court, Jim Wells County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10

- 03

- 48880

- CV Honorable Richard C. Terrell, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The clerk ’ s record is due on January 13, 2014 . On January 6, 2014

, the trial court clerk

fil ed a Notification of Late Record stating the clerk ’ s record will not be filed because appellant has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk ’ s fee for preparing the record and that appellant is not entitled to appeal without paying the fee.

It is therefore ORDERED that appellant provide written proof to this court no later than January 23, 2014 that either (1) the clerk ’ s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the clerk ’ s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the clerk ’ s fee. If appellant fails to file such written proof withi n the time provided, this appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 37.3(b).

____________________________ _____ Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 13th day of January, 20 14

.

_________________________ __________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
CAUSE NO. 13-10-00414CVF

ROBERT TOBIAS, § IN THE DISTRICT COURT

PLAINTIFF §

§

VS. §

§

CITY OF PEARSALL, A. ALVAREZ, D. § 218TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

RODRIGUEZ, C. CARROSCO, M. ARIZA, §

A. NIETO, A. HERNANDEZ, O. §

VILLARREAL, R. ALVAREZ, C. §

VALADEZ, H. LOZANO §

DEFENDANTS § FRIO COUNTY, TEXAS

AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:

The Defendant, City of Pearsall, gives notice of its desire to appeal the trial court’s

judgment entitled “Final Judgment” signed on April 15, 2015. Pursuant to Rule 25.1(d)(2)

of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1(d)(2), the Defendant

amends this notice to state its desire to also appeal the trial court’s order entitled “Order”

dated December 2, 2014, which in part is the subject of the “Final Judgment.” See Tex.

Sting, Ltd. v. R.B. Foods, Inc., 82 S.W.3d 644, 648 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 2002, pet.

denied). (A final judgment may consist of several orders that cumulatively dispose of all the

parties and issues.). Copies of the judgment and the order are attached to this Amended

Notice. This appeal is taken to the Fourth Court of Appeals for the State of Texas, sitting in

San Antonio, Texas.

ACCEPTED

04-15-00302-CV

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

9/23/2015 1:44:29 PM

KEITH HOTTLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/23/2015 1:44:29 PM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
Respectfully submitted,

LAW OFFICES OF ALBERT LÓPEZ 

14310 Northbrook Dr., Suite 200

San Antonio, Texas 78232

Telephone: (210) 404-1983

Fax: (210) 404-1990

By: /s/ Albert López 

 ALBERT LÓPEZ 

 State Bar No. 12562350

 alopezoffice@gmail.com

 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT

 CITY OF PEARSALL

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing instrument

was served by email and or electronic service upon to Mr. Reid E. Meyers, Attorney at Law,

11118 Wurzbach Rd., San Antonio, TX 78230 on September 23, 2015.

/s/ Albert López 

Albert López
### §7105. Establishment of the National Women's Business Council

There is established a council to be known as the National Women's Business Council, which shall serve as an independent source of advice and policy recommendations to the Interagency Committee, to the Administrator through the Assistant Administrator of the Office of Women's Business Ownership, to the Congress, and to the President.

(Pub. L. 100–533, title IV, §405, as added Pub. L. 103–403, title IV, §413, Oct. 22, 1994, 108 Stat. 4195.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 405 of Pub. L. 100–533, title IV, Oct. 25, 1988, 102 Stat. 2696, related to powers of the National Women's Business Council, prior to the general amendment of title IV of Pub. L. 100–533 by Pub. L. 103–403.
### §1538. Notice of reprogramming

#### (a) In general

The Secretary of Commerce shall provide notice to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and Committee on Appropriations of the Senate and to the Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries, Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, and Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives, not less than 15 days before reprogramming funds available for a program, project, or activity of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in an amount greater than the lesser of $250,000 or 5 percent of the total funding of such program, project, or activity if the reprogramming—

(1) augments an existing program, project, or activity;

(2) reduces by 5 percent or more (A) the funding for an existing program, project, or activity or (B) the numbers of personnel therefor as approved by Congress; or

(3) results from any general savings from a reduction in personnel which would result in a change in an existing program, project, or activity.

#### (b) Notice of reorganization

The Secretary of Commerce shall provide notice to the Committees on Merchant Marine and Fisheries, Science, Space, and Technology, and Appropriations of the House of Representatives, and the Committees on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and Appropriations of the Senate not later than 15 days before any major reorganization of any program, project, or activity of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

(Pub. L. 102–567, title IV, §403, Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4291.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Abolition of House Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries of House of Representatives abolished and its jurisdiction transferred by House Resolution No. 6, One Hundred Fourth Congress, Jan. 4, 1995. For treatment of references to Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries, see section 1(b)(3) of Pub. L. 104–14, set out as a note preceding section 21 of Title 2, The Congress.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.  20549

_________________


FORM 8-K

CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of Report (Date of Earliest Event Reported)
April 26, 2001


THE SMITHFIELD COMPANIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Virginia
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)

0-17084
54-1167160
(Commission file number)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)


311 County Street, Portsmouth, VA
23704
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)


(757) 399-3100
Registrant's telephone number, including area code


Item 5. Other Events.

On April 26, 2001, The Smithfield Companies, Inc. issued a press release
regarding an announcement that The Smithfield Companies, Inc. and Smithfield
Foods, Inc. are engaged in exclusive discussions regarding the possible
acquisition of The Smithfield Companies, Inc. by Smithfield Foods, Inc.
Attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated herein by reference is a
copy of the text of the press release issued by the Smithfield Companies,
Inc. on April 26, 2001.

Item 7.  Financial  Statements,  Pro  Forma  Financial  Information and
         Exhibits

(a)  Financial Statements of Business Acquired.

None.

(b)  Pro Forma Financial Information.

None.

(c)  Exhibits.

99.1  Press Release dated April 26, 2001 issued by The Smithfield Companies,
      Inc..


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant  has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

Dated:  April 27, 2001					THE SMITHFIELD COMPANIES, INC.


							By /s/  Mark D. Bedard
							             Mark D. Bedard
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer


Exhibit No.		Description

99.1	Press Release dated April 26, 2001 issued by The Smithfield Companies,
Inc.
Appendix A. A summary of sites where small portions of the historical record were completed using alternative techniques.

Station State Summary of missing data Techniques used to complete record

WY 1990: 8 consecutive days (Aug22-Aug29) Filled from published Water Data Reports (WDRs).

WY 1993: 23 assorted days between Jun30 and 

Aug18

WY 1996: 1 day (Jul6)

02331600 GA WY 1999: 16 days (Sep11-Sep27, except Sep22) Filled from local National Water Information System (NWIS) 

database.

WY 1988: 2 days (Dec31, Jan1)

WY 1989: 33 days (Jan31, May28-Jun28)

WY 1990: 1 day (Oct1)

WY 1998: 1 day (Jul06)

WY 2002: 6 days (Aug10-11, Aug13-14, Sep12-

13)

02420000 AL WY 2007: 3 days (Dec23, Jul20, Jul26)

WY 1987: 1 day (Oct1)

WY 2008: 1 day (Oct1)

03491000 TN WY 2002: 1 day (Mar18) Estimated by Water Science Center.

03536550 TN WY 1997: 2 days (Feb18, Mar11) Filled from local NWIS database.

03455000 TN Filled from local NWIS database.

02186000

02350600

SC

GA

Filled from published WDRs.

Filled using MOVE.1 procedure based on the index site 02350900.

Filled from local NWIS database.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7174

ERIC JERREL WILSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

MATTHEW B. HAMIDULLAH,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. Patrick Michael Duffy, District

Judge. (4:07-cv-00013-PMD).

Submitted: November 20, 2007 Decided: November 29, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eric Jerrel Wilson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Eric Jerrel Wilson, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the

magistrate judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000)

petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma

pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Wilson v. Hamidullah, No. 4:07-cv-00013-PMD (D.S.C. June 20, 2007).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 1304.207 Channel excavation on TVA-owned residential access shoreland. ( a ) Excavation of individual boat channels shall be approved only when TVA determines there is no other practicable alternative to achieving sufficient navigable water depth and the action would not substantially impact sensitive resources.
( b ) No more than 150 cubic yards of material shall be removed for any individual boat channel.
( c ) The length, width, and depth of approved boat channels shall not exceed the dimensions necessary to achieve three-foot water depths for navigation of the vessel at the minimum winter water elevation.
( d ) Each side of the channel shall have a slope ratio of at least 3:1.
( e ) Only one boat channel or harbor may be considered for each abutting property owner.
( f ) The grade of the channel must allow drainage of water during reservoir drawdown periods.
( g ) Channel excavations must be accomplished during the reservoir drawdown when the reservoir bottom is exposed and dry.
( h ) Spoil material from channel excavations must be placed in accordance with any applicable local, State, and Federal regulations at an upland site above the TVA Flood Risk Profile elevation. For those reservoirs that have no flood control storage, dredge spoil must be disposed of and stabilized above the limits of the 100-year floodplain and off of TVA property.
###### Editorial Note on Part 28

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear at 76 FR 76873, Dec. 9, 2011.

#### § 28.100 [Reserved]
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 10.33

                                 ADDENDUM NO. 3

                                     to the

          COMBINED QUOTA SHARE, AGGREGATE AND SPECIFIC EXCESS OF LOSS
                               REINSURANCE TREATY

               (hereinafter referred to as "Reinsurance Treaty")

                                   issued to

                 MEDICAL INTER-INSURANCE EXCHANGE OF NEW JERSEY
                           Lawrenceville, New Jersey

                 (hereinafter referred to as "Ceding Company")

                                       by

                   THE REINSURERS SUBSCRIBING THE RESPECTIVE
                      INTERESTS AND LIABILITIES AGREEMENTS

                   (hereinafter referred to as "Reinsurers")

The Ceding Company and the Reinsurers hereby agree to amend the captioned
Reinsurance Treaty, effective November 1st, 1998, with respect to business ceded
for the 1999 Coverage Year and thereafter, as follows:-

PARTICIPATION

The participation of the following Reinsurers is cancelled:-

40%     Hannover Reinsurance (Ireland) Ltd
        Reference US263100397

10%     E + S Reinsurance (Ireland) Ltd
        Reference US263200397

35%     Underwriters Reinsurance Company (Barbados) Inc.

14%     London Life and Casualty Reinsurance Company

1%      Lawrenceville Reinsurance Company Ltd

and     replaced with the following:-

46.00%  Hannover Reinsurance (Ireland) Ltd
        See fax dated: 3rd February 1999

11.50%  E + S Reinsurance (Ireland) Ltd
        See fax dated: 3rd February 1999

17.50%  Underwriters Reinsurance Company (Barbados) Inc.
        See fax dated: 29th January 1999

25%     European Reinsurance Company of Zurich
        See fax dated: 8th February 1999