alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (1) | The      Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended      September 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;      and |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      November 10, 2008 |  /s/      Paul J. Maddon, M.D., Ph.D.                                                         |
|------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                         | Paul      J. Maddon, M.D., Ph.D.Chief      Executive Officer                                       |
|                         |                                                                                               |
|                         |                                                                                               |
|                         |  /s/      Robert A. McKinney                                                                  |
|                         | Robert      A. McKinneyChief      Financial Officer(Principal      Finance and Accounting Officer) |
# C_2013046EN.01000401.xml

| 16.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 December 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Azienda Sanitaria Locale di Lecce, Università del Salento v Ordine degli Ingegneri della Provincia di Lecce and Others

(Case C-159/11) (1)

1

(Public contracts - Directive 2004/18/EC - Article 1(2)(a) and (d) - Services - Study and evaluation of the seismic vulnerability of hospital structures - Contract concluded between two public entities, one of which is a university - Public entity capable of being classified as an economic operator - Contract for pecuniary interest - Consideration not exceeding the costs incurred)

2013/C 46/06

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Azienda Sanitaria Locale di Lecce, Università del Salento

Applicants:

Defendants: Ordine degli Ingegneri della Provincia di Lecce, the Consiglio Nazionale degli Ingegneri, the Associazione delle Organizzazioni di Ingegneri, di Architettura e di Consultazione Tecnico Economica (OICE), Etacons srl, Ing. Vito Prato Engineering srl, Barletti — Del Grosso e Associati srl, Ordine degli Architetti della Provincia di Lecce, Consiglio Nazionale degli Architetti, Pianificatori, Paesaggisti e Conservatori

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consiglio di Stato — Interpretation of Article 1(2)(a) and (d), Article 2 and Article 28 of, and Annex II, categories 8 and 12, to Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts (OJ 2004 L 134, p. 114) — Contract attributed outside a procedure for awarding public works contracts — Provision of a service consisting in the conducting of a study and evaluation of the seismic vulnerability of certain hospitals — Contracts concluded between two public administrative authorities, the party providing the services being a university — Contracts for consideration, in which the consideration does not exceed the costs incurred

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

European Union public procurement law precludes national legislation which authorises the conclusion, without an invitation to tender, of a contract by which public entities establish cooperation among each other where — this being for the referring court to establish — the purpose of such a contract is not to ensure that a public task that those entities all have to perform is carried out, where that contract is not governed solely by considerations and requirements relating to the pursuit of objectives in the public interest or where it is such as to place a private provider of services in a position of advantage vis-à-vis his competitors.

---

(1)  OJ C 173, 11.6.2011.

1

---
# C_2010260EN.01002301.xml

| 25.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/23

---

Action brought on 19 July 2010 — Constellation Brands/OHMI (COOK'S)

(Case T-314/10)

()

2010/C 260/31

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Constellation Brands, Inc. (New York, USA) (represented by: B. Brandreth, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 29 April 2010 in case R 1048/2009-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 29 April 2010 in case R 1048/2009-1;

| — | Remit the case to the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) and order that restitutio in integrum be granted in respect of community trade mark application No 942128; |
| --- | --- |

—

Remit the case to the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) and order that restitutio in integrum be granted in respect of community trade mark application No 942128;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘COOK’S’

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Trade Marks and Register Department: Rejected the request for restitutio in integrum and confirmed the cancellation of the Community trade mark registration No 942128

Decision of the Trade Marks and Register Department:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 81 of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal erred in the application of this article and in its assessment of the facts in holding that the applicant’s representatives had failed to exercise due care in the circumstances.

Pleas in law:

---
#### § 71.13 Inspection of shipments in transit by APHIS representative.

All persons and corporations having control of the interstate transportation of livestock or poultry shall, when directed by an APHIS inspector so to do, stop the same in transit for inspection, and if any of such poultry or other animals are found upon such inspection to be infected with any contagious, infectious, or communicable disease or to have been exposed to such infection, the person or corporation having control of the transportation of such poultry or other animals shall, upon receipt of an order from an APHIS representative so to do, cease the carriage, transportation, or moving of such poultry or other animals unless such carriage, transportation, or moving can be accomplished in accordance with the regulations in this subchapter governing the interstate movement of poultry or other animals infected with or which have been exposed to the infection of such disease, and in all cases after the discovery of such infection or exposure thereto such poultry or other animals shall be handled in accordance with such regulations.

[28 FR 5937, June 13, 1963, as amended at 34 FR 15642, Oct. 9, 1969; 55 FR 11156, Mar. 27, 1990; 55 FR 15320, Apr. 23, 1990; 62 FR 27934, May 22, 1997]
#### Magoffin County v. Cooper.

March 14, 1939.

J. Brack Howard, Judge.

A. H. ADAMS for appellant

H. H. KAMEY for appellee.

Opinion op the Court by

Stanley, Commissioner,

Reversing.

*385This case is a companion of Magoffin County v. Bailey, 277 Ky. 383, 126 S. W. (2d) 833, this day decided.

The claim filed with and rejected by the Magoffin Fiscal Court is by A. L. Cooper, present sheriff, for “land sold for 1934 taxes,” $416. The form in which it was made is like that required for claims against a decedent’s estate. It was not even itemized. The judgment awards Cooper all that he asked for.

The motion of the county for an appeal is sustained and the judgment reversed for the reasons stated ' in the Bailey opinion.
Exhibit 32.a



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John P. Manning, Principal Executive Officer of the general partner of the general partner of the Partnership's general partner, C&M Management Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)-15 or 15(d)-15 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                        
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.



|                |  |                            
|--------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date:           |  |                            
|August 20, 2007 |  | /s/ John P. Manning        
|                |  |                            
|                |  | John P. Manning            
|                |  | Principal Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>





<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-01-2000
<CASH>                                           6,136
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,714
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,361
<INVENTORY>                                     52,663
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                72,328
<PP&E>                                         104,209
<DEPRECIATION>                                  30,728
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 167,854
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,834
<BONDS>                                         60,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            49
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,654
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   167,854
<SALES>                                        559,554
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               559,554
<CGS>                                          425,394
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  425,394
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               128,409
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,011
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,706)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,588
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,294)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,294)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.87)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.87)









</TABLE>
# C_2012303EN.01002103.xml

| 6.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/21

---

Order of the President of the Court of 8 May 2012 — ThyssenKrupp Elevator (CENE) GmbH, formerly ThyssenKrupp Aufzüge GmbH, ThyssenKrupp Fahrtreppen GmbH v European Commission

(Case C-503/11 P) (1)

1

2012/C 303/38

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 347, 26.11.2011.

1

---
Exhibit 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of CellStar Corporation
(the Registrant) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, in the capacity as indicated
below and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | -- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    Terry S. Parker

Terry S. Parker, Chief Executive Officer

Date: February 28, 2003
# C_2013046EN.01000301.xml

| 16.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/3

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 December 2012 — European Commission v Italian Republic

(Case C-68/11) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Environment - Directive 1999/30/EC - Pollution control - Limit values for concentrations of PM10 in ambient air)

10

2013/C 46/04

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: A. Alcover San Pedro and S. Mortoni, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, Agent, and by S. Varone, avvocato dello Stato)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Article 5(1) of Council Directive 1999/30/EC of 22 April 1999 relating to limit values for sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and oxides of nitrogen, particulate matter and lead in ambient air (OJ 1999 L 163, p. 41; now Article 13 of Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe, OJ 2008 L 152, p. 1) — Limit values for PM10 particles in ambient air exceeded from 2005

10

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by having failed to ensure that, for the years 2006 and 2007, concentrations of PM10 in ambient air did not exceed the limit values set in Article 5(1) of Council Directive 1999/30/EC of 22 April 1999 relating to limit values for sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and oxides of nitrogen, particulate matter and lead in ambient air in the 55 Italian zones and agglomerations referred to in the European Commission’s letter of formal notice of 2 February 2009, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that provision; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by having failed to ensure that, for the years 2006 and 2007, concentrations of PM10 in ambient air did not exceed the limit values set in Article 5(1) of Council Directive 1999/30/EC of 22 April 1999 relating to limit values for sulphur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide and oxides of nitrogen, particulate matter and lead in ambient air in the 55 Italian zones and agglomerations referred to in the European Commission’s letter of formal notice of 2 February 2009, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that provision;

10

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission and the Italian Republic to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission and the Italian Republic to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 145, 14.5.2011.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the third
quarter 10-QSB for the fiscal year ending August 31, 1998 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000835412
<NAME> TMS, INC.
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                         523,499
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,230,651
<ALLOWANCES>                                   100,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,736,733
<PP&E>                                       3,143,560
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,439,256
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,239,185
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          695,489
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       672,555
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,460,790
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,239,185
<SALES>                                      5,767,940
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,767,940
<CGS>                                        2,279,834
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,279,834
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,991,371
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                41,565
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,638
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                469,570
<INCOME-TAX>                                    89,261
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            380,309
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   380,309
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
        

</TABLE>
#### § 158.5 Verification.

The facts stated in the memorandum must be sworn to by persons having knowledge thereof, which latter fact must affirmatively appear in the affidavit. Except under unusual circumstances, such persons should be those who would appear as witnesses if hearing were had to testify as to the facts stated in the memorandum.
# C_2010179EN.01005802.xml

| 3.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/58

---

Action brought on 5 May 2010 — Begue and Others v Commission

(Case F-27/10)

(2010/C 179/101)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Christian Begue (Marcy, France) and Others (represented by: A. Woimant, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision refusing the applicants payment with retroactive effect of the allowance for standby duty referred to in Article 56b of the Staff Regulations.

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Tribunal should:

| — | Annul the decision (No R/467/09) of the authority authorised to conclude contracts rejecting the applicants ‘complaints’ against the rejection of 3 September 2009 concerning the application for payment with retroactive effect of the allowance for standby duty referred to in Article 56b of the Staff Regulations of Officials; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision (No R/467/09) of the authority authorised to conclude contracts rejecting the applicants ‘complaints’ against the rejection of 3 September 2009 concerning the application for payment with retroactive effect of the allowance for standby duty referred to in Article 56b of the Staff Regulations of Officials;

| — | Order the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the European Commission to pay the costs.

---
#### § 93.306 Inspection at the port of entry.

Inspection shall be made at the port of entry of all horses imported from any part of the world except as provided in §§ 93.318 and 93.323. All horses found to be free from communicable disease and not to have been exposed thereto within 60 days prior to their exportation to the United States shall be admitted subject to the other provisions in this part; all other horses, to include horses dead upon presentation, and horses arriving in the same shipment as such horses unless the cause of death can be determined to be unrelated to foreign animal disease, shall be refused entry. Horses refused entry, unless exported within a time fixed in each case by the Administrator of Veterinary Service, and in accordance with other provisions he or she may require in each case for their handling shall be disposed of as the Administrator may direct. Such portions of the transporting vessel, and of its cargo, which have been exposed to any such horses or their emanations shall be disinfected in such manner as may be considered necessary by the inspector in charge at the port of entry, to prevent the introduction or spread of livestock or poultry disease, before the cargo is allowed to land.

[55 FR 31495, Aug. 2, 1990. Redesignated and amended at 62 FR 56012, 56016, Oct. 28, 1997; 68 FR 6344, Feb. 7, 2003; 88 FR 63002, Sept. 14, 2023; 89 FR 24340, Apr. 8, 2024]