alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010346EN.01005501.xml

| 18.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 346/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 346/55

---

Action brought on 22 October 2010 — Prima TV v Commission

(Case T-504/10)

()

2010/C 346/107

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Prima TV SpA (Milan, Italy) (represented by: L. Fossati and L. Perfetti, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the contested decision. |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the contested decision.

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The decision that is contested in the present case is the same as that in Case T-501/10 TI Media Broadcasting and TI Media v Commission.

TI Media Broadcasting and TI Media

Commission

The applicant relies on three grounds in support of its claims.

By the first ground, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision, alleging infringement of legal provisions in the form of a manifest error of assessment, since the Commission found incorrectly that the conditions in the Italian pay-TV market had changed since 2003 to such an extent that it was possible to revise the commitments given by Newscorp in Case COMP/M.2876. All the evidence shows that, on the contrary, the market conditions which determined the commitments given to and accepted by the Commission in 2003 have not changed in any significant or lasting manner. In particular, Sky Italia still holds a position of absolute dominance in the Italian pay-TV market.

By the second ground, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision, alleging infringement of legal provisions and misuse of power, including as a result of manifest error of assessment, and infringement of the principle of proportionality, since the Commission amended the commitments given by Newscorp in Case COMP/M.2876 on the incorrect assumption that the fact that Sky Italia was not to participate in the next procedure for the allocation of terrestrial digital frequencies would preclude it from engaging in free-to-air television broadcasting in Italy. It is submitted in this connection that, on the contrary, Sky Italia is already active in free-to-air television broadcasting in Italy, broadcasts on digital terrestrial frequencies and will be able to acquire transmission capacity even if the commitments in question are not amended.

By the third ground, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision, alleging infringement of legal provisions and manifest error of assessment, since the Commission amended the commitments given by Newscorp in Case COMP/M.2876 at the request of Sky Italia, notwithstanding the fact that the replies received during the investigation into the market which took place during the administrative procedure — including those sent by Italian public bodies — gave clear indications of the negative impact which the amendment of the commitments in question would have in terms of competition at national level.

---
START TALKING BEFORE SHE

HEADS OFF TO SCHOOL.

It’s never too early to have a conversation about alcohol 

and other drugs.

The sooner you talk about the dangers of underage drinking and substance 

use, the greater chance you have of influencing your child’s decisions about 

using alcohol and other drugs. For tips on how—and when—to begin the 

conversation, visit 

www.underagedrinking.samhsa.gov

#TalkTheyHearYou PEP20-03-01-041
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 601 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit former Members and 

elected officers of Congress from lobbying Congress at any time after 

leaving office. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 28, 2019 

Mr. BRAUN (for himself and Mr. SCOTT of Florida) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit former 

Members and elected officers of Congress from lobbying 

Congress at any time after leaving office. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Banning Lobbying And 

5 Safeguarding Trust Act’’ or the ‘‘BLAST Act’’. 


khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 601 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITING FORMER MEMBERS AND OFFICERS 

2 OF CONGRESS FROM LOBBYING CONGRESS. 

3 (a) PROHIBITION.—Section 207(e) of title 18, United 

4 States Code, is amended by striking paragraph (1) and 

5 inserting the following: 

6 ‘‘(1) MEMBERS AND ELECTED OFFICERS OF

7 CONGRESS.—Any person who is a Senator, a Mem8 ber of the House of Representatives, or an elected 

9 officer of the Senate or the House of Representa10 tives and who, after that person leaves office, know11 ingly makes, with the intent to influence, any com12 munication to or appearance before any Member, of13 ficer, or employee of either House of Congress or 

14 any employee of any other legislative office of Con15 gress, on behalf of any other person (except the 

16 United States) in connection with any matter on 

17 which the former Senator, Member, or elected offi18 cial seeks action by a Member, officer, or employee 

19 of either House of Congress, in his or her official ca20 pacity, shall be punished as provided in section 

21 216.’’. 

22 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

23 Section 207(e)(2) of title 18, United States Code, is 

24 amended— 

25 (1) in the heading, by striking ‘‘OFFICERS AND

26 STAFF’’ and inserting ‘‘STAFF’’; 


khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 601 IS

1 (2) by striking ‘‘an elected officer of the Senate, 

2 or’’; 

3 (3) by striking ‘‘office or’’; and 

4 (4) by striking ‘‘former elected officer or’’. 

5 (c) APPLICABILITY.—The amendments made by this 

6 section shall apply with respect to an individual who leaves 

7 office on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


khammond on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
#### Mary GLOVER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Perry JOHNSON, et al., Defendants.

No. 77-CV-71229.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division.

July 23, 1998.

Deborah LaBelle, Ann Arbor, MI, for Plaintiffs.

Leo Friedman, Asst. Attorney General, Lansing, MI, for Defendants.

*OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING IMPOSITION OF CONTEMPT SANCTIONS*

FEIKENS, District Judge.

In its opinion and order of March 2, 1998, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit affirmed my ruling that the defendants were in contempt for failure to obey my order relating to vocational programming. *Mary Glover, et al. v. Perry Johnson, et al.,*138 F.3d 229 (6th Cir.1998).

This ruling came about as a result of an appeal of my opinion and order of July .19, 1996. In that opinion and order, I found by clear and convincing evidence that “Defendants are in contempt of my orders requiring six vocational programs at SCF [Scott Correctional Facility], There are only four vocational programs at Scott Correctional Facility which are operational. *Defendants admit that they have discontinued auto mechanics, building trades, and the institutional maintenance vocational programs.” Glover v. Johnson,*931 F.Supp. 1360, 1373-74 (E.D.Mich.1996) (emphasis added).

Plaintiffs now move for the imposition of sanctions. In my opinion and order of July 19, 1996, I held that the fine for contempt, effective October 1, 1996, “shall increase to $5,000 per day. Defendants shall pay the fine on a weekly basis, to the Clerk of the Court in Detroit, Michigan. Defendants may purge their contempt by achieving full compliance with all court orders .... ” *Id.*at 1385.

Following a hearing held on July 21, 1998, I determined that the defendants had not yet fully implemented the building trades program, the auto mechanics program, and the institutional maintenance program.

Defendants admit that the auto mechanics program can be activated as soon as students for this program are identified, and that a class of instruction will be held subsequent to the assessment and plan development.

As to the building trades program, all that the defendants admit that they have done is to announce that there are openings in this program.

As to the institutional maintenance program, while a new instructor was hired and began employment, I find that it is not operational in that it lacks any hands-on component, has only book work, and is not available to all class members at Scott Correctional Facility.

At the hearing held on July 21,1 approved an order appointing a new Vocational Coordinator: Joan M. deSouza; but, she will not begin her work until August 10,1998.

*800Thus, I HEREBY ORDER that as of June 8, 1998, the sanction heretofore provided be applied, and that counsel for the plaintiff class submit an appropriate order.
EXHIBIT 99.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    Section 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB/A of FTS Apparel,  Inc.
(the  Company) for the  quarterly  period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  Report),  Scott
Gallagher,  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Principal  Financial  Officer of the
Company,  hereby  certifies,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  to the best of his
knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/  Scott Gallagher
-------------------------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
August 20, 2002


This  certification  accompanies  this  Report  pursuant  to Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# C_2010234EN.01003803.xml

| 28.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/38

---

Order of the General Court of 8 July 2010 — Strålfors v OHIM (ID SOLUTIONS)

(Case T-211/10) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Application initiating proceedings - Formal requirements - Manifest inadmissibility)

2010/C 234/70

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Strålfors AB (Malmö, Sweden) (represented by: M.S. Nielsen, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 January 2010 (Case R 1111/2009-2), concerning an application for registration of word sign ID SOLUTIONS as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Strålfors AB shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Strålfors AB shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 195, 17.7.2010.

1

---
SERVED: October 23, 2013 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTERS OF 

SKYWEST AIRLINES 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0776 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0777 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0868 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0869 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0872 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0873 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0874 

FDMS NO. F AA-2012- 0904 

'FDMS NO. FAA-2013- 0617 

FDMS NO. FAA-2013- 0619 

NOTICE AND REQUEST TO PARTIES 

The court is preparing to schedule these cases for hearings. We anticipate scheduling the 

weight and balance cases during one week, then schedule the other cases during a 

subsequent week. The weeks do not need to be consecutive. 

Please provide your dates of availability for January, February and March 2014 on or 

before October 30, 2014. 

All future communications should be directed to the undersigned at: 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Attn: Patricia Matthews 

(Richard.Goodwin@dot.gov) 
Administrative matters should be directed to Patricia Matthews, Staff Assistant (202) 

366-5121 (Patricia.Matthews@dot.gov). 

All other matters should be addressed in writing/email to Judge Goodwin. 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 

2 
.. 

L . 

FDMS Nos. FAA-2012-0776, 2012-0777, 2012-0868, 

2012-0869,2012-0872,2012-0873,2012-0874,2012-0904, 

0617, 0619 (Civil Penalty Actions) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

ONE COPY 

Todd C. Emerson, Respondent's Counsel 

Director, Government and Legal Affairs 

Sky West Airlines 

444 South River Road 

St. George, UT 84 790 

TEL: 435-634-3530 

FAX: 435-634-3505 

Michael L. Dworkin, Respondent's Co.unsel 

MICHAEL L. DWORKIN AND ASSOCIATES 

465 California Street, Suite 210 

San Francisco, CA 941 04 

TEL: 415-421-2500 

FAX: 415-421-2560 

EMAIL: law@avialex.com 

Robert Spitzer, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of Regional Counsel 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, W A 98057 

TEL: 425-227-1417 

FAX: 425-227-1007 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 

2Wl 000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. · 

3 
L 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

4
Ken Selzer

of

Kansas

Ken Selzer, a regulatory appointee, is an insurance executive and former Kansas Insurance 

Commissioner who currently serves as an Executive Managing Director at a worldwide reinsurance 

broker with more than 35 years of experience in reinsurance and insurance regulation. Selzer has held 

many leadership positions in the both the public and private sectors and in the community. He has 

earned several professional credentials, including CPA, CPCU, ARe and FLMI and holds several 

insurance licenses. Ken and his wife Deb own and operate a farm in the Kansas City area.
§ 27.410 Third-party actions. ( a ) Nothing in this part shall confer upon any person except the Secretary a right of action, in law or equity, for any remedy including, but not limited to, injunctions or damages to enforce any provision of this part.
( b ) An owner or operator of a chemical facility may petition the Executive Assistant Director to provide the Department's view in any litigation involving any issues or matters regarding this part.
[72 FR 17729, Apr. 9, 2007, as amended at 86 FR 41894, Aug. 4, 2021]
Suppliers of Blind Urine Samples 

Date: August 2019

A list of blind sample suppliers has been compiled by the Division of Workplace Programs, for information 

purposes only, to facilitate compliance with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Mandatory 

Guidelines for Federal Workplace Drug Testing Programs. It does not constitute an endorsement for any or all of 

the suppliers. It reflects solely the information supplied to this office by those suppliers who requested inclusion 

on the list. Purchasers should obtain information from the supplier to verify compliance with Mandatory 

Guidelines requirements for blind samples prior to use in federal workplace drug testing programs. 

Any supplier interested in having its name added to the list below should contact Dr. Eugene Hayes at 240-276-

1459 (phone) or by email: Eugene.hayes@samhsa.hhs.gov. 

Abuse Control Associates

c/o KKL Enterprises, Inc.

7 Robinson Spur

Huntsville, TX 77320

Contact: Charles Rushing

Phone: 936-436-9026

Fax: 936-435-0578

Email: kklinc@wt.net

ElSohly Laboratories, Inc.

5 Industrial Park Drive

Oxford, MS 38655

Contact: Dr. Mahmoud ElSohly

Phone: 662-236-2609

Fax: 662-234-0253

Email: elsohly@elsohly.com

Website: http://www.elsohly.com

National Toxicology Specialists

1425 Elm Hill Pike

Nashville, TN 37210

Contact: Dr. Howard Taylor

Phone: 615-353-1888

Fax: 615-356-1890

Email: htaylor@drugtestinfo.com

Website: https://www.drugtestinfo.com/

Professional Toxicology Services

(formerly A. T. Laboratories)

7917 Bond Street

Lenexa, KS 66214

Contact: Dr. Stan Kammerer

Phone: 913-599-3535

Fax: 913-599-0660

Email: atlaboratories@sbcglobal.net

Website: https://www.protoxservices.com/

RTI International 

Center for Forensic Sciences 

3040 Cornwallis Road, Bldg. 7 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 

Contact: Andy McDaniel

Phone: 919-541-7223 / 1-800-334-8571 x 27223

Fax: 919-541-7042 

Email: amd@rti.org

Website: https://www.rti.org/

Quality Assurance Co. 

310 Commerce Dr. 

Martinez, GA 30907 

Contact: Dr. Roy Altman, Tom Lavin 

Phone: 706-863-6536 

Fax: 706-863-3313 

Email: qas@toxicologycontrols.com

Website: www.toxicologycontrols.com

Sure-Tech Diagnostic Associates 

11040 Lin Valle Drive, Suite D 

St. Louis, MO 63123 

Contact: Dr. Quincy Crider 

Phone: 800-678-8933 / 314-894-8933 

Fax: 314-894-5223 

Email: INFO@SURE-TECH.NET

Website: http://www.sure-tech.net
### 2

## 2**~-._) f~** **:.~**

### q, Docket Management Facility US Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey Avenue, SE West Building Ground Floor Room Wl2-140 Washington, DC 20590 DearMr. Allen: 

## JAN 142013 1300 PennsylvaniaAvenue NW Washington, DC 20229 

### U.S. Customs and Border Protection

This letter is informing you that the United States Customs and Border Protection (CBP), Office of Air and Marine (OAM) is requesting the renewal ofExemption No. 10300. In a letter dated May 23, 2011 this officerequested an exemption to 14 CFR §91.209(a) (1) and(b) during operations ofthe Predator-B/MQ-9 Unmanned Aircraft inthe National Airspace System. Additionallythis office requested that a summary ofthe petition not be published in the Federal Register due to the potential security-sensitivity ofthe exemption, which the FAA also granted. Ifthe FAA approves the renewal ofexemptionNo. 10300, this office is requesting again that it not be published in the Federal Register. Justification for this renewal request remains the same as the original request dated May 23, 2011; CBP has evidence that entities engaging in illicit activity along the borders are actively surveilling

. the night skies for the presence ofthe Predator "B", which is clearly visible due to the anti-collision

lights and position lights. Additionally evidence exists that Night Vision Goggles are also be used to detect the Predator "B". The point ofcontact for this renewal will be Richard Booth, Director, Domain Operations and Integration. He can be reached at 202-344-2889 and richard.booth@dhs.gov
. Sincerely,

Lothar Eckardt Executive Director National Air Security Operations U.S. Customs and Border Protection Office ofAir and Marine
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

TERRENCE FITZPATRICK,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 153 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 10th day of August, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
2015 CROP YEAR

IRRIGATED POPCORN

YIELD EXCLUSION (YE)

Gulf of Mexico

Atlantic

Ocean

Pacific

Ocean

-130° -120° -110° -100° -90° -80° -70°

45° 40° 35° 30° 25°

Coordinate System: Albers

Central Meridian: 96°0'0"W

1st Std Parallel: 20°0'0"N

2nd Std Parallel: 60°0'0"N

Latitude of Origin: 40°0'0"N

Metadata:

County Files - US Census Tiger

Files 2013

YE Coverage - USDA - RMA

December 2014

0 125 250 500 750 1,000

Miles

STATEMENT

The Maps produced represent

the number of years (since 1995)

eligible for yield exclusion for

the 2015 crop year.

Document Path: K:\APH\Irrigated\Popcorn\IrrigatedPopcorn.mxd

TABLE

Links directly to the state table

(double click)

Number of Years Eligible for

Yield Exclusion (YE)

0 years

1 year

2 to 4 years

5 to 7 years

8 to 10 years

11 to 15 years
Exhibit 31.01
 
  1
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Alliance Semiconductor Corporation;2
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and5
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors:a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Melvin L. Keating  Melvin L. Keating