alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000913497         
<NAME>                        WNC HOUSING TAX CREDIT FUND IV, L.P. - SERIES 3
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                           2,371,389
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                           2,371,389
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,531,645
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,855,590
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,531,645
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   161,610
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      106,236
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   628,631
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   5,350
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (573,257)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (573,275)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (573,375)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (36.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
### §6713. Title insurance activities of national banks and their affiliates

#### (a) General prohibition

No national bank may engage in any activity involving the underwriting or sale of title insurance.

#### (b) Nondiscrimination parity exception

#### (1) In general

Notwithstanding any other provision of law (including section 6701 of this title), in the case of any State in which banks organized under the laws of such State are authorized to sell title insurance as agent, a national bank may sell title insurance as agent in such State, but only in the same manner, to the same extent, and under the same restrictions as such State banks are authorized to sell title insurance as agent in such State.

#### (2) Coordination with "wildcard" provision

A State law which authorizes State banks to engage in any activities in such State in which a national bank may engage shall not be treated as a statute which authorizes State banks to sell title insurance as agent, for purposes of paragraph (1).

#### (c) Grandfathering with consistent regulation

#### (1) In general

Except as provided in paragraphs (2) and (3) and notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b), a national bank, and a subsidiary of a national bank, may conduct title insurance activities which such national bank or subsidiary was actively and lawfully conducting before November 12, 1999.

#### (2) Insurance affiliate

In the case of a national bank which has an affiliate which provides insurance as principal and is not a subsidiary of the bank, the national bank and any subsidiary of the national bank may not engage in the underwriting of title insurance pursuant to paragraph (1).

#### (3) Insurance subsidiary

In the case of a national bank which has a subsidiary which provides insurance as principal and has no affiliate other than a subsidiary which provides insurance as principal, the national bank may not directly engage in any activity involving the underwriting of title insurance.

#### (d) "Affiliate" and "subsidiary" defined

For purposes of this section, the terms "affiliate" and "subsidiary" have the same meanings as in section 1841 of title 12.

#### (e) Rule of construction

No provision of this Act or any other Federal law shall be construed as superseding or affecting a State law which was in effect before November 12, 1999, and which prohibits title insurance from being offered, provided, or sold in such State, or from being underwritten with respect to real property in such State, by any person whatsoever.

(Pub. L. 106–102, title III, §303, Nov. 12, 1999, 113 Stat. 1408.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in subsec. (e), is Pub. L. 106–102, Nov. 12, 1999, 113 Stat. 1338, known as the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 1999 Amendment note set out under section 1811 of Title 12, Banks and Banking, and Tables.
Exhibit 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of SUNBURST ACQUISITIONS V, INC.
(the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending July 31, 2004, (the "Report"), I, Jay
Lutsky, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)	The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the Company's financial position and results of
operations.


July 28, 2005

	/s/ Jay Lutsky
	Chief Executive Officer and
	Chief Financial and
	Accounting Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       6,650,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,426,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   883,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,752,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            20,561,000
<PP&E>                                      48,739,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              15,145,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              60,314,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,830,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 15,670,000
<COMMON>                                        19,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,304,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                60,314,000
<SALES>                                     28,059,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            28,059,000
<CGS>                                       27,139,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               27,139,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               532,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,010,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (14,246,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   126,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (14,372,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (14,372,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.88)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.88)


</TABLE>
# C_2006186EN.01001001.xml

| 9.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 186/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 186/10

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4270 — Platinum Equity/Textron Fastening Systems)

(2006/C 186/10)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 31 July 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes. |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4270. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4270. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---
§ 590.407 Export certification and marking of containers with export inspection mark. ( a ) Exporters must apply for export certification of inspected and passed products shipped to any foreign country. Exporters may apply for an export certificate using a paper or electronic application. FSIS will assess exporters that submit an electronic application the charge in § 592.500(d) of this chapter.
( b ) FSIS will issue only one certificate for each consignment, except in the case of error in the certificate or loss of the certificate originally issued. A request for a replacement certificate, except in the case of a lost certificate, must be accompanied by the original certificate. The new certificate will carry the following statement: “Issued in replacement of ______”, with the numbers of the certificates that have been superseded.
( c ) FSIS will deliver a copy of the export certificate to the person who requested such certificate or his agent. Such persons may duplicate the certificate as required in connection with the exportation of the product.
( d ) FSIS will retain a copy of the certificate.
( e ) ( 1 ) When authorized by inspection personnel, establishments must mark the outside container of any inspected and passed egg products destined for export, the securely enclosed pallet within the consignment, or closed means of conveyance transporting the consignment, with a mark that contains a unique identifier that links the consignment to the export certificate or an official mark with the following form:[1]
( 2 ) Ship stores, small quantities exclusively for the personal use of the consignee and not for sale or distribution, and shipments by and for the U.S. Armed Forces, are exempt from the requirements of this section.
( f ) Exporters may request inspection personnel to issue certificates for export consignments of product of official establishments not under their supervision, provided the consignments are first identified as having been “U.S. inspected and passed,” are found to be neither adulterated nor misbranded, and are marked as required by paragraph (e) of this section.
[81 FR 42235, June 29, 2016] Footnotes -
590.407
[1] The number “1234567” is given as an example only. The number on the export certificate will correspond to the printed number on the export certificate.
BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

WASHINGTON, D. C.

---------------------------------------------

Joint Application of :

:

 AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. :

and :

QANTAS AIRWAYS LIMITED : DOT-OST-2008-

: 0138

under 14 CFR Part 212 for statements of :

authorization (blanket codesharing) :

---------------------------------------------

30-DAY NOTICE OF AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.

OF ADDITIONAL CODESHARE SERVICE 

Communications with respect to this document should be sent to:

VIRASB VAHIDI WILLIAM K. RIS, JR.

Senior Vice President - Senior Vice President - Marketing and Planning Government & Regulatory

and Chief Commercial Officer Affairs

American Airlines, Inc. American Airlines, Inc.

P.O. Box 619616, MD 5634 1101 17th Street, N.W.

DFW Airport, Texas 75161 Washington, D.C. 20036

ROBERT A. WIRICK FRANCIS C. HEIL

Managing Director, Regulatory Senior Attorney

and International Affairs American Airlines, Inc. 

American Airlines, Inc. 1101 17th Street, N.W.

P.O. Box 619616, MD 5434 Washington, D.C. 20036

DFW Airport, Texas 75161 (202) 496-5642

(817) 963-0394 francis.heil@aa.com

robert.wirick@aa.com

March 20, 2013
BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

WASHINGTON, D. C.

---------------------------------------------

Joint Application of :

:

AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. :

 and : DOT-OST-2008-

QANTAS AIRWAYS LIMITED : 0138

:

under l4 CFR Part 2l2 for statements of :

authorization (blanket codesharing) :

---------------------------------------------

30-DAY NOTICE OF AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.

OF ADDITIONAL CODESHARE SERVICE

 American Airlines, Inc., under condition (c) of 

Department Action in this docket on May 23, 2008, hereby gives 

proper notice that effective not sooner than April 20, 2013,

or once all regulatory approvals have been received, Qantas QF*

code will be displayed on flights operated by American between 

Los Angeles and Cabo San Lucas, Mexico.

 Respectfully submitted,

_____________________________ 

Francis C. Heil

Senior Attorney

American Airlines, Inc.

March 20, 2013
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have this day served the foregoing document by 

email on the following persons:

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com jhill@dlalaw.com

scott.mcclain@delta.com steve.morrissey@united.com

sametta.c.barnett@delta.com mgoldman@sgbdc.com

dan.weiss@united.com rsilverberg@sgbdc.com

karine.faden@united.com dhainbach@ggh-airlaw.com

esahr@eckertseamons.com rpommer@atlasair.com

russell.bailey@alpa.org dmrosenthal@jamhoff.com

jonathan.linde@united.com dpdean@jamhoff.com

bob.kneisley@wnco.com dkirstein@yklaw.com

robert.land@jetblue.com jyoung@yklaw.com

msinick@ssd.com william.stallings@usdoj.gov

cdonley@ssd.com dwight.moore@ustranscom.mil

gbleopard@fedex.com john.allen@faa.gov

cefelts@fedex.com urskr@state.gov

kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com gmurphy@crowell.com

nssparks@fedex.com cjsimpson@zsrlaw.com

lhalloway@crowell.com benjamin.slocum@usairways.com

efaberman@wileyrein.com howard.kass@usairways.com

mroller@rollerbauer.com anita.mosner@hklaw.com

jennifer.nowak@hklaw.com

____________________

Francis C. Heil

Senior Attorney

American Airlines, Inc.

March 20, 2013
### §147. Stock; issuance at par value

Each share of the original or any subsequent issue of stock of a China Trade Act corporation shall be issued at not less than par value, and shall be paid for in cash, or in accordance with the provisions of section 148 of this title, in real or personal property which has been placed in the custody of the directors. No such share shall be issued until the amount of the par value thereof has been paid the corporation; and when issued, each share shall be held to be full paid and nonassessable; except that if any share is, in violation of this section, issued without the amount of the par value thereof having been paid to the corporation, the holder of such share shall be liable in suits by creditors for the difference between the amount paid for such share and the par value thereof.

(Sept. 19, 1922, ch. 346, §7, 42 Stat. 851; Feb. 26, 1925, ch. 345, §7, 43 Stat. 996.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1925—Act Feb. 26, 1925, substituted "not less than par value" for "par value only".
§ 2.18 Phased electric rate increase filings. ( a ) In general, when a public utility files a phased rate increase, the Commission will determine the appropriate suspension period based on the total increase requested in all phases. If a utility files a rate increase within sixty days after filing another rate increase, the Commission will consider the filings together to be a phased rate increase request.
( b ) This policy will not be applied if the increase is phased: ( 1 ) To coordinate with new facilities coming on line;
( 2 ) To implement a rate moderation plan;
( 3 ) To avoid price squeeze;
( 4 ) To comply with a settlement approved by the Commission; or
( 5 ) If the utility makes a convincing showing that application of the policy would be harsh and inequitable and that, therefore, good cause has been shown not to apply the policy in the case.
[52 FR 11, Jan. 11, 1987]
§ 1301.61 Purpose and scope. ( a ) *Purpose.* These regulations, taken together with the Information Security Oversight Office's implementing directive at 32 CFR part 2001, Classified National Security Information, provide the basis for TVA's security classification program implementing Executive Order 13526, “Classified National Security Information,” as amended (“the Executive Order”).
( b ) *Scope.* These regulations apply to TVA employees, contractors, and individuals who serve in advisory, consultant, or non-employee affiliate capacities who have been granted access to classified information.
#### § 2.12 Calculation of taxes for property of public utilities and licensees constructed or acquired after January 1, 1970.

Pursuant to the provisions of section 441(a)(4)(A) of the Tax Reform Act of 1969, 83 Stat. 487, 625, public utilities and licensees regulated by the Commission under the Federal Power Act which have exercised the option provided by that section to change from flow through accounting will be permitted by the Commission, with respect to liberalized depreciation, to employ a normalization method for computing federal income taxes in their accounts and annual reports with respect to property constructed or acquired after January 1, 1970, to the extent with which such property increases the productive or operational capacity of the utility and is not a replacement of existing capacity. Such normalization will also be permitted for ratemaking purposes to the extent such rates are subject to the Commission's ratemaking authority. As to balances in Account 282 of the Uniform System of Accounts, “Accumulated deferred income taxes—Other property,” it will remain the Commission's policy to deduct such balances from rate base in rate proceedings.

(Secs. 3, 4, 15, 16, 301, 304, 308, and 309 (41 Stat. 1063-1066, 1068, 1072, 1075; 49 Stat. 838, 839, 840, 841, 854-856, 858-859; 82 Stat. 617; 16 U.S.C. 796, 797, 803, 808, 809, 816, 825, 825b, 825c, 825g, 825h, 826i), as amended, Secs. 8, 10, and 16 (52 Stat. 825-826, 830; 15 U.S.C. 717g, 717i, 717o))

[Order 404, 35 FR 7964, May 23, 1970, as amended by Order 567, 42 FR 30612, June 16, 1977]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alliance Laundry Systems LLC, Alliance Laundry Corporation and
Alliance Laundry Holdings LLC (the Companies) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas F. LEsperance, Chief
Executive Officer and President of the Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/    THOMAS F. LESPERANCE         
|Chief Executive Officer and President

May 11, 2007
#### § 418.3 Preparation and maintenance of written recall procedures.

Each official establishment must prepare and maintain written procedures for the recall of any meat, meat food, poultry, or poultry product produced and shipped by the official establishment. These written procedures must specify how the official establishment will decide whether to conduct a product recall, and how the establishment will effect the recall, should it decide that one is necessary.
# C_2010288EN.01005502.xml

| 23.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/55

---

Action brought on 23 August 2010 — Nike International/OHMI — Deichmann (VICTORY RED)

(Case T-356/10)

()

(2010/C 288/103)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Nike International Ltd (Oregon, U.S.A.) (represented by: M. De Justo Bailey, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Deichmann SE (Essen, Germany)

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office For Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 18 May 2010 in case R 1309/2009-2; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office For Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 18 May 2010 in case R 1309/2009-2;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings, and; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings, and;

| — | Order the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs of the proceedings, should it become an intervening party in this case. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs of the proceedings, should it become an intervening party in this case.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The applicant

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘VICTORY RED’, for goods in classes 18 and 28

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Mark or sign cited: German trade mark registration No 30318528 of the word mark ‘Victory’, for goods in classes 18, 25 and 28; International trade mark registration No 819143 of the word mark ‘Victory’, for goods in classes 18, 25 and 28

Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition for all of the contested goods and rejected the application in its entirety

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal made an incorrect assessment of the likelihood of confusion, in particular of the similarity of the signs.

---