alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 34.1 Applicability; definitions; exemptions in case of certain State regulation, certain short-term issuances and certain qualifying facilities. ( a ) *Applicability.* This part applies to applications for authorization from the Commission to issue securities or assume an obligation or liability which are filed by: ( 1 ) Licensees and other entities pursuant to sections 19 and 20 of the Federal Power Act (41 Stat. 1073, 16 U.S.C. 812, 813) and part 20 of the Commission's regulations; and
( 2 ) Public utilities pursuant to section 204 of the Federal Power Act (49 Stat. 850, 16 U.S.C. 824c).
( b ) *Definitions.* For the purpose of this part: ( 1 ) The term *utility* means a licensee, public utility or other entity seeking authorization under sections 19, 20 or 204 of the Federal Power Act;
( 2 ) The term *securities* includes any note, stock, treasury stock, bond, or debenture or other evidence of interest in or indebtedness of a utility;
( 3 ) The term *issuance or placement of securities* means issuance or placement of securities, or assumption of obligation or liability; and
( 4 ) The term *State* means a State admitted to the Union, the District of Columbia, and any organized Territory of the United States.
( c ) *Exemptions.* ( 1 ) If an agency of the State in which the utility is organized and operating approves or authorizes, in writing, the issuance of securities prior to their issuance, the utility is exempt from the provisions of sections 19, 20 and 204 of the Federal Power Act and the regulations under this part, with respect to such securities.
( 2 ) This part does not apply to the issue or renewal of, or assumption of liability on, a note or draft maturing one year or less after the date of such issue, renewal, or assumption of liability, if the aggregate of such note or draft and all other then-outstanding notes and drafts of a maturity of one year or less on which the utility is primarily or secondarily liable, is not more than 5 percent of the par value of the other then-outstanding securities of the utility as of the date of issue or renewal of, or assumption of liability on, the note or draft. In the case of securities having no par value, the par value for the purpose of this part is the fair market value, as of the date of issue or renewal of, or assumption of liability on, the note or draft.
( 3 ) *For certain qualifying facilities.* Any cogeneration or small power production facility which is exempt from sections 19, 20 and 204 of the Federal Power Act pursuant to § 292.601 of this chapter shall be exempt from the provisions of this part.
[Order 182, 46 FR 50514, Oct. 14, 1981, as amended at 48 FR 9851, Mar. 9, 1983; Order 575, 60 FR 4852, Jan. 25, 1995]
Editorial Note on Part 28
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear at 76 FR 76873, Dec. 9, 2011.

§ 28.61 Burden and degree of proof. ( a ) In appealable actions, as defined by 5 U.S.C. 7701(a), agency action must be sustained by the Board if: ( 1 ) It is a performance-based action and is supported by substantial evidence; or
( 2 ) It is brought under any other provision of law, rule, or regulation as defined by 5 U.S.C. 7701(a) and is supported by a preponderance of evidence.
( b ) Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section, the agency's decision shall not be sustained if the petitioner: ( 1 ) Shows harmful error in the application of the agency's procedures in arriving at such decision;
( 2 ) Shows that the decision was based on any prohibited personnel practice described in 4 CFR 2.5; or
( 3 ) Shows that the decision was not in accordance with law.
( c ) In any other action within the Board's jurisdiction, the petitioner shall have the responsibility of presenting the evidence in support of the action and shall have the burden of proving the allegations of the appeal by a preponderance of the evidence.
( d ) *Definitions.* For purposes of this section, the following definitions shall apply: *Harmful error* means error by the agency in the application of its procedures which, in the absence or cure of the error, might have caused the agency to reach a conclusion different from the one reached.
*Preponderance of the evidence* means that degree of relevant evidence which a reasonable person, considering the record as a whole, would accept as sufficient to support a conclusion that the matter asserted is more likely to be true than not true.
*Substantial evidence* means that degree of relevant evidence which a reasonable person, considering the record as a whole, might accept as adequate to support a conclusion, even though other reasonable persons might disagree. This is a lower standard of proof than preponderance of the evidence.
[58 FR 61992, Nov. 23, 1993, as amended at 68 FR 69302, Dec. 12, 2003]
#### GEE DEE ENTERPRISES, INC., a Corporation, Plaintiff v. RAMESH J. MELWANI, individually and DBA LIBERTY FASHIONS or LIBERTY FASHIONS AND SHOES, Defendants GEE DEE ENTERPRISES, INC., a Corporation v. UNITED RESOURCES, INC., and LIBERTY SHOES, INC., Defendants

Civil No. 940-76

Civil No. 941-76

Superior Court of Guam

December 14, 1976

BENSON, *Judge*

ORDER

This matter came before the court on motion of Liberty Shoes, and was submitted for decision after oral argument on December 10,1976.

The decision of the court is

1) That a 5-day summons is permissible in a case of unlawful detainer.

2) That proper notice to pay or to quit must be served before institution of an unlawful detainer action.

3) That an unlawful detainer cannot be maintained against one not in possession.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion to dismiss be granted as to defendant Liberty Shoes for reason No. 2 above, and also granted as to United Resources for reason No. 3 above.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Service Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Pamela J. Montpelier, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and
Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K (Item 601(b)(32)) promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Securities Act) and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act). In accordance with clause (ii) of
Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/ PAMELA J. MONTPELIER
|Pamela J. Montpelier    
|Chief Executive Officer 



May 14, 2004
## L i D A R D r o n e S e r v i c e s , L L C

P o s t F l i g h t C h e c k l i s t

A

. A i r c r a f t

a

. U n p l u g f l i g h t b a t t e r y

. b

. U n p l u g v i d e o t r a n s m i t t e r b a t t e r y

. c

. C h e c k a i r c r a f

t t e m p e r a t u r e s o f m o t o r s a n d o t h e r e l e c t r o n i c s

. d

. C h e c k h a r d w a r e o n a i r c r a f

t t o e n s u r e t i g h t n e s s

. e

. C h e c k p r o p e l l e r s f

o r a n y i n d i c a t i o n s o f c h i p s , c r a c k s , o r w e a r b e y o n d s a f e

s e r v i c e a b i l i t y f

. S t o r e a i r c r a f

t i n c a s e g

. P u t b a t t e r i e s b a c k i n t o s t o r a g e c a s e s

. B

. B a t t e r i e s

a

. C h e c k t e m p e r a t

u r e o f b a t t e r i e s b

. C h e c k b a t t e r i e s f

o r a n y i n d i c a t i o n o f s w e l l i n g

c

. C h e c k o v e r a l l v o l t a g e o f b a t t e r y p a c k s d

. C h e c k i n d i v i d

u a l c e l l v o l t a g e s i n b a t t e r y p a c k s

e

. P u t b a t t e r i e s o n s t o r a g e c h a r g e

. C

. C a m e r a & L i D A R

a

. V e r i f y t h a t r e c o r d i n g h a s s t o p p e d

. b

. T u r n o f f c a m e r a & L i D A R

c

. R e m o v e c a m e r a f

r o m g i m b a l

. D

. R a d i o s

a

. T u r n o f f r a d i o s

. b

. P u t r a d i o s b a c k i n t o c a s e s

. E

. G r o u n d s t a t i o n s

a

. T u r n o f f g r o u n d s t a t i o n s

. b

. U n p l u g b a t t e r i e s f

r o m g r o u n d s t a t i o n s

. c

. C h e c k a n t e n n a s o n g r o u n d s t a t i o n s f o r s e r v i c e a b i l i t y

. d

. P a c k g r o u n d s t a t i o n s i n t o c a s e s

. F

. O t h e r

a

. C l e a n u p a l l t r a s h a n d d e b r i s i n a r e a

. b

. N o t i f y p r o p e r t y o w n e r s o f d e p a r t

u r e

.
### §323. Repealed. July 25, 1947, ch. 327, §1, 61 Stat. 449

Section, act Oct. 29, 1942, ch. 632, 56 Stat. 1012, related to scholarships for meteorological students in weather forecasting during World War II.
# C_2012194EN.01000401.xml

| 30.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 194/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 194/4

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 May 2012 — Helena Rubinstein, L’Oréal SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Allergan Inc.

(Case C-100/11 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 8(5) - Community word marks BOTOLIST and BOTOCYL - Community and national figurative and word marks BOTOX - Declaration of invalidity - Relative grounds for refusal - Damage to reputation)

2012/C 194/05

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellants: Helena Rubinstein, L’Oréal SA (represented by: A. von Mühlendahl, Rechtsanwalt)

Appellants:

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent), Allergan Inc. (represented by: F. Clark, Barrister)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 16 December 2010 in Joined Cases T-345/08 and T-357/08 Rubinstein and l’Oréal v OHIM — Allergan (Botolist and Botocyl), by which the General Court dismissed an action for annulment brought by the proprietor of the Community word mark ‘BOTOLIST’ for goods classified in Class 3, against Decision R 863/2007-1 of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 28 May 2008, which set aside the decision of the Cancellation Division rejecting the application for a declaration of invalidity of that mark, submitted by the proprietor of the Community and national figurative and word marks ‘BOTOX’ for goods classified in Classes 5 and 16 and services classified in Class 42 — Interpretation and application of Art. 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Art. 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Relative grounds for refusal — Damage to reputation — Interpretation and application of Art. 73 of Regulation No 40/94 (now Art. 75 of Regulation No 207/2009) — Obligation to state reasons

Rubinstein and l’Oréal

OHIM — Allergan (Botolist and Botocyl)

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Helena Rubinstein SNC and L’Oréal SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Helena Rubinstein SNC and L’Oréal SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 145, 14.5.2011.

1

---
EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO 

Ex Parte:

Aprobación de Cambio de Estatus

Inactivo de mayo de 2024

2024 TSPR 67

213 DPR ___

Número del Caso: EM-2024-0008

Fecha: 20 de junio de 2024

Materia: Aprobación de cambio de estatus inactivo de mayo de 2024.

Este documento está sujeto a los cambios y correcciones del proceso 

de compilación y publicación oficial de las decisiones del Tribunal 

Supremo. Su distribución electrónica se hace como un servicio público 

a la comunidad.
EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO

EM-2024-0008

 

RESOLUCIÓN

En San Juan, Puerto Rico, a 20 de junio de 2024.

Durante el periodo de mayo de 2024, este Tribunal 

autorizó el cambio a estatus como Abogado(a) Inactivo(a) 

a las abogadas y los abogados siguientes:

Jorge Lucas P. Valdivieso, Jr. 2,131

Frank Quiñones Vigo 3,003

Luis Fred Salgado 3,035

Wilfredo González Barreto 5,132

Jorge Ortiz Murias 6,754

Olga Ivette Vázquez Valentín 7,049

Rosalie López Castellanos 7,321

Carlos M. Rodríguez Muñiz 7,345

Salvador Ribas Dominicci 7,552

Annie Franco Carmona 7,959

Ana E. Rivera Pérez 9,154

Nora P. Campos Orrego 9,324

Ex Parte:

Aprobación de Cambio de Estatus 

Inactivo de mayo de 2024

 
 EM-2024-0008 2

Melissa Martínez Ortiz 10,711

Jorge R. Ruiz Pabón 10,824

Diocelyn E. Rivera Díaz 15,909

Edna M. González Soto 20,703

Kenny O. Sierra Vargas 20,838

Publíquese.

Lo acordó el Tribunal y certifica el Secretario del 

Tribunal Supremo. 

 Javier O. Sepúlveda Rodríguez

 Secretario del Tribunal Supremo
Editorial Note on Part 284
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 284 appear at 65 FR 10222, Feb. 25, 2000.

§ 284.264 Terms and conditions. ( a ) *General conditions.* ( 1 ) A participant must make every reasonable attempt to minimize use of emergency natural gas transactions.
( 2 ) Before deliveries of emergency natural gas commence, a responsible official of the recipient must provide any participants in the emergency natural gas transaction sufficient information to enable the participants to form a good faith belief that an emergency exists or is imminent.
( 3 ) No participant may engage in an emergency natural gas transaction if its participation will adversely affect service to its existing customers.
( 4 ) A participant may not sell emergency natural gas if, during the term of the sale, it is also purchasing emergency natural gas under this subpart, except when natural gas is being sold to relieve an emergency on another, separate segment of the participant's system.
( 5 ) An interstate pipeline, acting in an emergency gas transaction as a broker or agent on behalf of another participant or any other person, may not receive compensation for such brokerage or agency service.
( 6 ) A recipient of emergency natural gas that directly benefits from the service must: ( i ) Provide line loss and the fuel volumes required to transport the emergency natural gas; and
( ii ) Pay for the facilities required to be constructed to conduct the emergency natural gas transaction.
( b ) *Duration* — ( 1 ) *Emergency sale or transportation.* An emergency natural gas transaction is limited to 60 consecutive calendar days, except that such transaction may be continued for an additional 60 consecutive days if: ( i ) Fifteen days prior to the end of the initial 60-day period, the recipient of emergency natural gas files a petition that: ( A ) Describes fully the continued emergency,
( B ) Requests a waiver of the initial 60-day limitation and permission for an extension of the transaction for an additional 60 days; and
( ii ) Within the 15-day period, the Commission does not, by order, prohibit continuation of the emergency natural gas transaction for the additional 60-day period.
( 2 ) *Redelivery in emergency exchange.* The redelivery of emergency natural gas received under an exchange arrangement must occur within 180 consecutive days following the termination of deliveries of the emergency natural gas.
### **CHAPTER 44—PROTECTION OF HORSES**

Sec.
1821.
Definitions.
1822.
Congressional statement of findings.
1823.
Horse shows and exhibitions.
1824.
Unlawful acts.
1824a.
Export of horses.
1825.
Violations and penalties.
1826.
Notice of violations to Attorney General.
1827.
Utilization of personnel of Department of Agriculture and officers and employees of consenting States; technical and other nonfinancial assistance to State.
1828.
Rules and regulations.
1829.
Preemption of State laws; concurrent jurisdiction; prohibition on certain State action.
1830.
Omitted.
1831.
Authorization of appropriations.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1
                                                                   ------------



The Board of Directors and Stockholders
CellStar Corporation


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form 
S-8 (Nos. 33-87754 and 333-23381) and Form S-3 (No. 333-41753) of CellStar 
Corporation of our report dated January 12, 1999, relating to the consolidated 
balance sheets of CellStar Corporation and subsidiaries as of November 30, 1998 
and 1997, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'
equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in
the three-year period ended November 30, 1998, and the related schedule, which
report appears in the November 30, 1998 annual report on Form 10-K of CellStar
Corporation.



                                                  /s/ KPMG LLP



Dallas, Texas
February 24, 1999
###### Editorial Note on Part 28

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear at 76 FR 76873, Dec. 9, 2011.

#### § 28.44 Taking of depositions.

Depositions may be taken before any person not interested in the outcome of the proceedings who is authorized by law to administer oaths.
### **CHAPTER 92—YEAR 2000 COMPUTER DATE CHANGE**

Sec.
6601.
Findings and purposes.
6602.
Definitions.
6603.
Application of chapter.
6604.
Punitive damages limitations.
6605.
Proportionate liability.
6606.
Prelitigation notice.
6607.
Pleading requirements.
6608.
Duty to mitigate.
6609.
Application of existing impossibility or commercial impracticability doctrines.
6610.
Damages limitation by contract.
6611.
Damages in tort claims.
6612.
State of mind; bystander liability; control.
6613.
Appointment of special masters or magistrate judges for Y2K actions.
6614.
Y2K actions as class actions.
6615.
Applicability of State law.
6616.
Admissible evidence ultimate issue in State courts.
6617.
Suspension of penalties for certain year 2000 failures by small business concerns.
<PAGE>
 
                                  EXHIBIT 11

                            TOTAL CONTAINMENT, INC.
                STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF EARNING PER SHARE
                                  (Unaudited)


                                                             Twelve Months Ended
                                                                 December 31,
                                                             1997           1996
                                                             ----           ----
                                                                (In thousands)
Primary:
Average shares outstanding                                   4,642         4,642

Options were anti-dilutive                                       -             -
                                                           -------         -----
     Totals                                                  4,642         4,642
                                                           -------         -----
     Net Income                                           $(12,356)       $  398
                                                           -------         -----
     Per share amount                                     $  (2.66)       $ 0.09
                                                           -------         -----

Fully diluted:
Average share outstanding                                    4,642         4,642
Options were anti-dilutive                                       -             -
                                                           -------         -----

     Totals                                                  4,642         4,642
                                                           -------         -----
     Net Income                                           $(12,356)       $  398
                                                           -------         -----
     Per share amount                                     $  (2.66)       $ 0.08
                                                           -------         -----
### §3745. Qualifications for promotion

(a) A Reserve officer shall not be promoted to a higher grade unless the officer has been found to be physically qualified and the character of the officer's service subsequent to the convening of the selection board which recommended the officer for promotion has been verified as satisfactory.

(b) Subsection (a) of this section does not exclude from promotion a Reserve officer physically disqualified by a medical board for duty at sea or in the field, if the disqualification results from wounds received in the line of duty, and those wounds do not incapacitate the officer for other duties in the grade to which the officer is to be promoted.

(Added Pub. L. 96–322, §1, Aug. 4, 1980, 94 Stat. 1012, §734; renumbered §3745, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §118(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4233.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 786 of this title prior to the complete revision of former chapter 21 of this title by Pub. L. 96–322.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 734 of this title as this section.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alliance Laundry
Systems LLC, Alliance Laundry Corporation and Alliance Laundry Holdings LLC (the Companies) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Bruce P. Rounds, Vice President, and Chief Financial Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Companies.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|/s/ BRUCE P. ROUNDS                       
|Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



May 13, 2005