alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 154.206 Motion to place suspended rates into effect. ( a ) If, prior to the end of the suspension period, the Commission has issued an order requiring changes in the filed rates, or the filed rates recover costs for facilities not certificated and in service as of the proposed effective date, in order to place the suspended rates into effect, the pipeline must file a motion at least one day prior to the effective date requested by the pipeline. The motion must be accompanied by revised tariff sheets or sections reflecting any changes ordered by the Commission or modifications approved by the Commission during the suspension period under § 154.205. The filing of the revised tariff sheets or sections must: ( 1 ) Comply with the requirements of subparts A, B, and C of this part;
( 2 ) Identify the Commission order directing the revision;
( 3 ) List the modifications made to the currently effective rate during the suspension period, the docket number in which the modifications were filed, and identify the order permitting the modifications.
( b ) Where the Commission has suspended the effective date of a change of rate, charge, classification, or service for a minimal period and the pipeline has not included a motion in its transmittal letter, or has specified in its transmittal letter pursuant to § 154.7(a)(9), that it reserves its right to file motion to place the proposed change of rate, charge, classification, or service into effect at the end of the suspension period, the change will go into effect, subject to refund, upon motion of the pipeline.
( c ) Where the Commission has suspended the effective date of a change of rate, charge, classification, or service for a minimal period and the pipeline has included, in its transmittal letter pursuant to § 154.7(a)(9), a motion to place the proposed change of rate, charge, classification, or service into effect at the end of the suspension period, the change will go into effect, subject to refund, on the authorized effective date.
[Order 582, 60 FR 52996, Oct. 11, 1995, as amended by Order 714, 73 FR 57535, Oct. 3, 2008]
# C_2010346EN.01005102.xml

| 18.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 346/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 346/51

---

Action brought on 18 October 2010 — Mayer Naman v OHIM — Daniel & Mayer (David Mayer)

(Case T-498/10)

()

2010/C 346/101

Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: David Mayer Naman (Rome, Italy) (represented by: S. Sutti, lawyer, S. Cazzaniga, lawyer, and V. Fedele, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Daniel & Mayer Srl (Milan, Italy)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | vary the contested decision in its entirety; |
| --- | --- |

—

vary the contested decision in its entirety;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: Figurative mark containing the word element ‘David Mayer’ (registration application No 1518950), to designate inter alia goods in Classes 18 and 25

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The applicant

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity: Daniel & Mayer Srl

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity:

Trade mark right of applicant for the declaration: Italian word mark ‘DANIEL & MAYER MADE IN ITALY’ (No 472351), to designate goods in Class 25, and the unregistered word mark ‘DANIEL & MAYER’, used in Italy in relation to the ‘manufacture and sale of garments and accessories’

Trade mark right of applicant for the declaration:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Application for a declaration of invalidity upheld in part

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement and misapplication of Article 8 of Regulation No 207/2009

Pleas in law:

---
#### § 592.520 Overtime rate.

When operations in an official plant require the services of inspection personnel beyond their regularly assigned tour of duty on any day or on a day outside the established schedule, such services are considered as overtime work. The official plant must give reasonable advance notice to the inspector of any overtime service necessary. For each calendar year, FSIS will calculate the overtime rate for inspection service, per hour per program employee, using the following formula: The quotient of dividing the Office of Field Operations plus Office of International Affairs inspection program personnel's previous fiscal year's regular direct pay by previous fiscal year's regular hours, plus the quotient multiplied by the calendar year's percentage of cost of living increase multiplied by 1.5, plus the benefits rate, plus the travel and operating rate, plus the overhead rate, plus the allowance for bad debt rate. FSIS calculates the benefits rate, the travel and operating rate, the overhead rate, and the allowance for bad debt using the formulas set forth in § 592.510(b), and the cost of living increases and percentage of inflation factors set forth in § 592.510(c).

[71 FR 2143, Jan. 13, 2006, as amended at 76 FR 20228, Apr. 12, 2011]
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of CLSTHoldings, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal yearended November 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies,in the capacity as indicated below and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

1.                                       The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                                       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 
|   | /s/ Robert A. Kaiser                                                       |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Robert A. Kaiser, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |

 

Date:November 4, 2009

 

----
#### Johnson *et al. v.*Coleman *et al.*

June 29, 1910.

Equitable petition. Before Judge Peagati. Campbell superior court.

August 3, 1909.

*J. F. Golightly,*for plaintiffs.

Holden, J.

1. Proof of weakness of mind not amounting to imbecility is not sufficient to warrant a jury in setting aside a contract, there being no proof of fraud or undue, influence. *Nance*v. *Stockburger,*111 *Ga.*821 (36 S. E. 100).

2. The evidence in this case was not sufficient to show a lack of mental capacity on the part of the grantor to make the deed which it is sought to set aside, nor weakness 'of mind on the part of the grantor, coupled with fraud or undue influence practiced upon him by the grantee, so as to avoid the deed; and the court committed no error in granting a nonsuit.

*Judgment affirmed**

*All the Justices concur.*
# C_2013026EN.01001301.xml

| 26.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/13

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 29 November 2012 — United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v European Commission

(Case C-416/11 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Directive 92/43/EEC - Conservation of natural habitats - List of sites of Community importance for the Mediterranean biogeographical region - Inclusion in the list of a site proposed by the Kingdom of Spain - Site allegedly covering an area of British Gibraltar territorial waters and an area of the high seas - Action for annulment - Measure merely confirmatory)

2013/C 26/22

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented by: S. Ossowski, Agent, D. Wyatt QC and V. Wakefield, Barrister)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: D. Recchia and K. Mifsud Bonnici, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Intervener in support of the Commission: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: N. Díaz Abad and A. Rubio González, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the Commission:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 May 2011 in Case T-115/01 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v European Commission [2011] ECR II-0000, by which that court dismissed as inadmissible an action for partial annulment of Commission Decision 2010/45/EC of 22 December 2009 adopting, pursuant to Council Directive 92/43/EEC, a third updated list of sites of Community importance for the Mediterranean biogeographical region [notified under number C(2009) 10406], to the extent that it retains on the list a site called ‘Estrecho Oriental’ (ES6120032), proposed by Spain, which includes an area of British Gibraltar territorial waters and an area of the high seas

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

European Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to pay the costs;

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 298, 8.10.2011.

1

---
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed April 21, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-541 Lower Tribunal No. F94-27882C

________________ 

### Darryl Jerome Cash, Appellant,
vs. 

### The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Marlene Fernandez-Karavetsos, Judge. Darryl Jerome Cash, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee. Before FERNANDEZ, SCALES, and HENDON, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 49 (Monday, March 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 13621]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5759]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Family History and Diamond Blackfan Anemia, DD11-
010, Initial Review

    Correction: This notice was published in the Federal Register on 
January 21, 2011, Volume 76, Number 14, Page 3909. The date for the 
aforementioned meeting has been changed to the following:

DATES: April 27, 2011 (Closed).
    Contact Person for More Information: Michael Dalmat, Dr.P.H., 
Scientific Review Officer, CDC, National Center for Chronic Disease 
Prevention and Health Promotion, Office of the Director, Extramural 
Research Program Office, 4770 Buford Highway, NE., Mailstop K-92, 
Atlanta, Georgia 30341, Telephone: (770) 488-6423, E-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1a575f5e2b5a595e59345d554c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="79343c3d48393a3d3a573e362f">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency 
for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: March 7, 2011.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2011-5759 Filed 3-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```
**CERTIFICATION**

I, R. Paul Gray certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10QSB of Surgical Safety
   Products, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
   statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
   make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
   statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
   this annual report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
   information included in the this annual report, fairly present in all
   material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
   flows of the registrant as of, and for the periods presented in this annual
   report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
   establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures for the
   registrant and have:
        a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
           material information relating to the registrant, including the
           consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
           entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report
           is being prepared;
        b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
           and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing of this
           annual report; and
        c. Presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
           effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
           evaluation noted preceding;
5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
   our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors:
        a. All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
           controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
           record, process, summarize, and report financial data and have
           identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
           internal controls; and
        b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
           employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
           controls; and
6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
   annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls
   or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
   subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
   corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
   weaknesses.

Date: October 7, 2003

                                              /s/      R. Paul Gray
                                              By:      R. Paul Gray
                                              Title:   Chief Financial Officer
```
p.1 

OAR Box 1147 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

169)IV-E-42 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 4/22/2008 2:42:56 PM Sheet 169 of 242 
P.2 

§ & • \ UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

<L\y ANN ARBOR. MICHIGAN 48105 

MAY I 6 S988 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: 

FROM: 

TO: 

Further Briefings on Onboard Hardware 

John F. Anderson, Senior Project Manager 

Standards Development and Support Branch 

Public Docket A-87-11 

The Onboard hardware briefing described in my memo of 

April 20, 1988 has subsequently been presented to several other 

groups. These groups are the Office of Management and Budget 

on April 21, 1988, the Government Accounting Office and 

National Transportation Safety Board on April 21, 1988, The 

American Automobile Association on April 27, 1988, and The 

American Petroleum Institute on April 28, .1988. Attendance 

lists for these meetings are attached. 

Attachments 
P.3 

EPA/OMB Meeting on Onboard Hardware 

Name ORG Phone 

John Anderson 

Chet France 

Charles Gray 

Don Zinger 

John Gabrysiak 

Nicholas Garcia 

Ed Watts 

Art Fraas 

Rich Theroux 

Al McGartland 

Dick Wilson 

EPA 

EPA 

EPA 

EPA 

EPA 

OMB 

OMB 

OMB 

OMB 

OMB 

EPA 

313/668-

313/668-

313/668-

202/382-

313/668-

202/395-

020/395-

202/395-

202/395-

202/395-

202/382-

4496 

4338 

4404 

•7647 

•4223 

3084 

6827 

3084 

3084 

3084 

•7645 
P.4 

EPA/GAO/NTSB Meeting on Onboard Hardware 

April 21, 1988 

Name ORG Phone 

Chet France 

John Anderson 

Chuck Freed 

Stan Ritchick 

Larry Goldsmith 

Ron Morgan 

Denny Matteotti 

Charles Grissinger 

Merritt M. Birky 

Charles Gray 

Richard Wilson 

John Gabrysiak 

EPA 

EPA 

EPA 

GAO 

GAO 

GAO 

GAO 

GAO 

NTSB 

EPA 

EPA 

EPA 

313/668-4338 

313/668-4496 

202/382-2479 

202/252-0631 

202/252-0633 

202/252-0666 

202/252-0650 

202/252-0641 

202/382-6785 

313/668-4404 

202/382-7645 

313/668-4223 
P.5 

EPA/AAA Meeting on Onboard Hardware 

April 27, 1988 

Name 

Dean ChiIds 

George Viverette 

Bob Livinstone 

John Fobian 

William Berman 

John Haifley 

John Gabrysiak 

Chester France 

John Anderson 

ORG 

AAA 

AAA 

AAA Potomac 

AAA 

AAA 

AAA 

EPA 

EPA 

EPA 

Traffic Safety 

Hwy Transp. 

ERS 

Auto Engrg. 

Govt Affairs 

Govt Affairs 
P.6 

EPA/API Meeting on 

April 28, 

Onboard Hardware 

1988 

Name 

John Anderson 

Jerry Levine 

Ed Crockett 

Bob Boeke 

William McLeod 

Hugh Shannon 

Glenn Passavant 

Carol Scott 

Chet France 

Charles Gray 

Bill Koehl 

R.J. Campion 

J.S. Welstand 

ORG 

EPA 

Amoco Oil 

API 

Mobil 

Texaco 

Exxon 

EPA 

API 

EPA 

EPA 

Mobil R&D 

Exxon Co,USA 

Chevron Research 

Phone 

313/668-4496 

312/856-2605 

202/682-8318 

703/849-4185 

914/253-7087 

201-474-2187 

313/668-4408 

202/682-8481 

313-668-4338 

313/668-4404 

609/423-1040ext2773 

713/656-3174 

415/620-4150
### §2059. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–35, title XII, §1210, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 721

Section, Pub. L. 92–573, §10, Oct. 27, 1972, 86 Stat. 1217; Pub. L. 94–284, §10(a), May 11, 1976, 90 Stat. 506, related to filing of a petition by an interested person for issuance, amendment, or revocation of a consumer product safety rule.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Aug. 14, 1981, see section 1215 of Pub. L. 97–35, set out as an Effective Date of 1981 Amendment note under section 2052 of this title.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5069 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5069

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the exclusion 
                  for educational assistance programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 18, 2020

 Ms. Cortez Masto introduced the following bill; which was read twice 
                and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the exclusion 
                  for educational assistance programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Upward Mobility Enhancement Act''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN EXCLUSION FOR EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 127(a) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows:
            ``(2) Maximum exclusion.--
                    ``(A) In general.--This section shall apply only to 
                the first $11,500 of educational assistance furnished 
                to an individual during a calendar year.
                    ``(B) Inflation adjustment.--In the case of any 
                calendar year after 2021, the $11,500 amount in 
                subparagraph (A) shall be increased by an amount equal 
                to--
                            ``(i) such dollar amount, multiplied by
                            ``(ii) the cost-of-living adjustment 
                        determined under section 1(f)(3) for the 
                        calendar year in which such taxable year begins 
                        by substituting `calendar year 2020' for 
                        `calendar year 2016' in subparagraph (A)(ii) 
                        thereof.
                If any increase determined under this subparagraph is 
                not a multiple of $50, such increase shall be rounded 
                to the next lowest multiple of $50.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2020.
                                 <all>
```
§ 1304.5 Conduct of hearings. ( a ) If a hearing is to be held for any of the reasons described in § 1304.4(c), TVA shall give notice of the hearing to interested persons. Such notice may be given by publication in a daily newspaper of general circulation in the area of the proposed structure, personal written notice, posting on TVA's Internet Web site, or by any other method reasonably calculated to come to the attention of interested persons. The notice shall provide to the extent feasible the place, date, and time of hearing; the particular issues to which the hearing will pertain; the manner of becoming a party of record; and any other pertinent information as appropriate. The applicant shall automatically be a party of record.
( b ) Hearings may be conducted by any such person or persons as may be designated by the Vice President, the Vice President's designee, or the Chief Executive Officer. Hearings are public and are conducted in an informal manner. Parties of record may be represented by counsel or other persons of their choosing. Technical rules of evidence are not observed although reasonable bounds are maintained as to relevancy, materiality, and competency. Evidence may be presented orally or by written statement and need not be under oath. Cross-examination by parties of witnesses or others providing statements or testifying at a hearing shall not be allowed. After the hearing has been completed, additional evidence will not be received unless it presents new and material matter that in the judgment of the person or persons conducting the hearing could not be presented at the hearing. The Vice President may arrange a joint hearing with another federal agency where the subject of an application will require the approval of and necessitate a hearing by or before that other agency. In TVA's discretion, the format of any such joint hearing may be that used by the other agency.
[79 FR 4621, Jan. 29, 2014]