alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(No. 32005.

#### Edward A. Murray, Appellee, *vs.*John L. Sheridan *et al.*— (Robert J. Blake *et al.,*Appellants.)

*Opinion filed November 27, 1951*

Rehearing *denied Jan. 21, 1952.*

Allen, Darlington & Elliott, of Chicago, for appellants.

Joseph F. Elward, and Edward S. Macie, both of Chicago, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Hershey

delivered the opinion of the court:

Appellee, doing business as Murray Coal Company, a judgment creditor of John L. Sheridan and his wife, Frances M. Sheridan, filed an amended complaint in the superior court of Cook County praying that a certain deed from the Sheridans to appellants be decreed to be a mort*66gage. The amended complaint alleged that appellee had obtained a judgment against the defendants, John L. Sheridan and Frances ÍVL Sheridan, which remains unsatisfied; that thereafter Sheridan and his wife conveyed the real estate in which they made their home to appellants, Robert J. Blake and Margaret Blake; that Sheridan was indebted to Blake, and that the conveyance to the Blakes, while absolute in form, was in fact in the nature of a mortgage given to secure the indebtedness. The obvious purpose of the litigation was to make the real estate in question subject to the payment of the judgment of appellee. A decree was entered, in conformity with the prayer of the complaint, declaring the fee-simple title to the real estate in question to be in John L. Sheridan and Frances M. Sheridan, subject to a mortgage to appellants for whatever sum might be found to be due them. It is appellants’ contention that the conveyance to them was an absolute conveyance of the property in question.

Neither party to the appeal has questioned our jurisdiction. It is fundamental that we have only such appellate jurisdiction as is given to us by law. The court must, therefore, of its own motion, inquire into its jurisdiction, and neither the consent of the parties nor their desire that we should consider a case can confer jurisdiction upon us if we have it not. *Jones*v. *Horrom,*363 Ill. 193; *Prudential Ins. Co.*v. *Hoge,*359 Ill. 36.

It is apparent from an examination of the record that there is no question in this case which gives this court jurisdiction. A freehold is not directly involved in a suit by a judgment creditor to set aside a fraudulent conveyance made by a debtor and to subject the land conveyed to the payment of the judgment. *(Feltinton*v. *Rudnik,*401 Ill. 362; *Bradford Nat. Bank*v. *Floyd,*368 Ill. 187.) The same rule applies in a suit to have a deed to a tract of land, absolute on its face, declared a mortgage. ( *Vidon*v. *Roberts,*392 Ill. 381; *Carlson*v. *Chicago Title and*
      *67
      *Trust Co.*375 Ill. 125.) Before this court can entertain jurisdiction of a direct appeal upon the ground that a freehold is involved, it must appear that a freehold is directly, and not collaterally, contingently and incidentally involved. *Swinson*v. *Sodaman,*369 Ill. 442.

This court not having jurisdiction, the cause is transferred to the Appellate Court for the First District.

*Cause transferred.*
§ 367.9230 Account 923, Outside services employed. ( a ) This account must include the fees and expenses of professional consultants and others for general services with the exception of fees and expenses for outside services of account 928, Regulatory commission expenses (§ 367.9280), and account 930.1, General advertising expenses (§ 367.9301). Separate subaccounts must be provided for auditing, legal, engineering, management consulting fees and any other fees for professional or outside services.
( b ) Records must be maintained so as to permit ready analysis showing the nature of service, identity of the person furnishing the service, affiliation to the service company, and, if allocated to more than one company, the specific method of allocation.
PUBLIC LAW 113–267—DEC. 18, 2014 128 STAT. 2945 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5562: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 160 (2014): 

Dec. 8, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 15, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 113–267 

113th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 801 West 

Ocean Avenue in Lompoc, California, as the ‘‘Federal Correctional Officer Scott 

J. Williams Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SCOTT J. WILLIAMS 

MEMORIAL POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 801 West Ocean Avenue in Lompoc, California, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Federal Correctional Officer 

Scott J. Williams Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Federal Correctional Officer Scott J. Williams Memorial 

Post Office Building’’. 

Approved December 18, 2014. 

Dec. 18, 2014 

[H.R. 5562] 


srobinson on DSKB307YQ1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
### §5521. National Science Foundation activities

As part of the Program described in subchapter I—

(1) the National Science Foundation shall provide high-end computing and networking infrastructure support for all science and engineering disciplines, and support basic research and human resource development in all aspects of networking and information technology; and

(2) the National Science Foundation shall use its existing programs, in collaboration with other agencies, as appropriate, to improve the teaching and learning of networking and information technology at all levels of education and to increase participation in networking and information technology fields, including by individuals identified in sections 1885a and 1885b of title 42.

(Pub. L. 102–194, title II, §201, Dec. 9, 1991, 105 Stat. 1599; Pub. L. 114–329, title I, §105(j), Jan. 6, 2017, 130 Stat. 2983.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2017—Pub. L. 114–329, §105(j)(1)(A), (2), struck out subsec. (a) designation and heading "General responsibilities" and struck out subsec. (b) which authorized appropriations for fiscal years 1992 to 1996.

Par. (1). Pub. L. 114–329, §105(j)(1)(B), inserted "high-end" after "National Science Foundation shall provide" and substituted "networking and information technology; and" for "high-performance computing and advanced high-speed computer networking;".

Par. (2). Pub. L. 114–329, §105(j)(1)(C), (D), added par. (2) and struck out former par. (2) which read as follows: "to the extent that colleges, universities, and libraries cannot connect to the Network with the assistance of the private sector, the National Science Foundation shall have primary responsibility for assisting colleges, universities, and libraries to connect to the Network;".

Pars. (3), (4). Pub. L. 114–329, §105(j)(1)(C), struck out pars. (3) and (4) which read as follows:

"(3) the National Science Foundation shall serve as the primary source of information on access to and use of the Network; and

"(4) the National Science Foundation shall upgrade the National Science Foundation funded network, assist regional networks to upgrade their capabilities, and provide other Federal departments and agencies the opportunity to connect to the National Science Foundation funded network."
Joel Hayes Notice of Errata

1 of 2 BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF AVIATION ENFORCEMENT AND PROCEEDINGS WASHINGTON, D.C.

--------------- --------------- --------------- --------- ) ) Joel Hayes, ) third-party complainant ) ) v. ) Docket DOT-OST-2014-0077 ) American Airlines, Inc. ) )

--------------- --------------- --------------- --------- ) NOTICE OF ERRATA
1. Paragraph five of my complaint contai ns the following sentence: “While I have flown Internationally twice before in the last few years, this was my first chance to actually have an upgrade to Business on an Intern ational flight.” This sentence contains a typographical error and a factual error, both of which resulted from editing.
2. The correct sentence is as follows: “While I have flown internationally twice in the last few years, this was only my first chance to have what I hoped would be a round-trip upgrade to business cla ss on an interna tional flight.”
3. I apologize for the error.

Respectfully submitted, /s/ Joel HayesJoel Hayes Notice of Errata

2 of 2 Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that I have, this 9th da y of June, 2014 caused a copy of the foregoing Notice to be served by electronic mail on the following persons: Robert Silverberg, Esq. rsilverberg@sgbdc.com Robert Gorman, Esq. robert.gorman@dot.gov

/s/

_____________________ Joel Hayes
Prevention Ad-Lib 

Fill in the blank within each prevention sentence with an adjective, verb, or noun. Read it back 

and share on social media to build your #MyPreventionStory. 

GENERAL 

Prevention makes me feel .

I am able to because of prevention. 

My life is because of prevention. 

I to take care of my mental health. 

I to prevent substance use. 

I feel safe and healthy because I .

PERSONAL STORY 

I use as a prevention activity. 

Resources from help me in my prevention journey. 

I look to for support in my prevention journey. 

PROFESSIONAL STORY 

At my organization, we to support prevention journeys. 

My career is because of the work I do towards prevention. 

I feel by my colleagues and the work being done in the field 

of prevention.

(adjective)

(verb)

(verb)

(verb)

(verb)

(verb)

(noun or verb)

(noun)

(noun)

(adjective)

(adjective)

(adjective)
### §4014. Reporting requirement; amendment of certificate; revocation

#### (a) Report of changes in matters specified; application to amend; treatment as application for issuance

(1) Any applicant who receives a certificate of review—

(A) shall promptly report to the Secretary any change relevant to the matters specified in the certificate, and

(B) may submit to the Secretary an application to amend the certificate to reflect the effect of the change on the conduct specified in the certificate.

(2) An application for an amendment to a certificate of review shall be treated as an application for the issuance of a certificate. The effective date of an amendment shall be the date on which the application for the amendment is submitted to the Secretary.

#### (b) Request for compliance information; failure to provide; notice of noncompliance; revocation or modification; antitrust investigation; no civil investigative demand

(1) If the Secretary or the Attorney General has reason to believe that the export trade, export trade activities, or methods of operation of a person holding a certificate of review no longer comply with the standards of section 4013(a) of this title, the Secretary shall request such information from such person as the Secretary or the Attorney General deems necessary to resolve the matter of compliance. Failure to comply with such request shall be grounds for revocation of the certificate under paragraph (2).

(2) If the Secretary or the Attorney General determines that the export trade, export trade activities, or methods of operation of a person holding a certificate no longer comply with the standards of section 4013(a) of this title, or that such person has failed to comply with a request made under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall give written notice of the determination to such person. The notice shall include a statement of the circumstances underlying, and the reasons in support of, the determination. In the 60-day period beginning 30 days after the notice is given, the Secretary shall revoke the certificate or modify it as the Secretary or the Attorney General deems necessary to cause the certificate to apply only to the export trade, export trade activities, or methods of operation which are in compliance with the standards of section 4013(a) of this title.

(3) For purposes of carrying out this subsection, the Attorney General, and the Assistant Attorney General in charge of the antitrust division of the Department of Justice, may conduct investigations in the same manner as the Attorney General and the Assistant Attorney General conduct investigations under section 1312 of this title, except that no civil investigative demand may be issued to a person to whom a certificate of review is issued if such person is the target of such investigation.

(Pub. L. 97–290, title III, §304, Oct. 8, 1982, 96 Stat. 1242.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 8, 1982, see section 312 of Pub. L. 97–290, set out as a note under section 4011 of this title.
**EXHIBIT32.1**

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report of Prospect MedicalHoldings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007(the “Report”), I, Jacob Y. Terner, M.D., Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| August  20, 2007 |       | /s/ JACOB Y. TERNER           |       |       |
|------------------|------------|-------------------------------|------------|------------|
|             | ** ** | **Jacob Y. Terner, M.D.**     | ** ** | ** ** |
|             | ** ** | **Chairman of the Board and** | ** ** | ** ** |
|             | ** ** | **Chief Executive Officer**   | ** ** | ** ** |

 

----
§ 376.105 Chairman. ( a ) *Administrative head of agency.* The Chairman is the administrative head of the Commission.
( b ) *Administrative responsibilities.* The Chairman is responsible on behalf of the Commission for the executive and administrative operation of the Commission, including functions of the Commission with respect to— ( 1 ) The appointment and employment of Administrative Law Judges in accordance with the provisions of Title 5, United States Code.
( 2 ) The selection, appointment, and fixing of the compensation of such personnel as he deems necessary.
( 3 ) The supervision of personnel employed by or assigned to the Commission, except that each Commissioner may select and supervise personnel for his personal staff.
( 4 ) The distribution of business among personnel and among administrative units of the Commission.
( 5 ) The procurement of services of experts and consultants in accordance with section 3109 of Title 5, United States Code.
[45 FR 21222, Apr. 1, 1980, as amended by Order 613, 64 FR 73407, Dec. 30, 1999]
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****The FTC...**
 
SuDoc Number:FT 1.1:

Item Number:0533-A-04 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000602367
 
2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009| 2010 | 2011 | 2012
 
April 21, 2020
### §508. Coast Guard health-care professionals; licensure portability

(a) In General.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law regarding the licensure of health-care providers, a health-care professional described in subsection (b) may practice the health profession or professions of the health-care professional at any location in any State, the District of Columbia, or a Commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United States, regardless of where such health-care professional or the patient is located, if the practice is within the scope of the authorized Federal duties of such health-care professional.

(b) Described Individuals.—A health-care professional described in this subsection is an individual—

(1) who is—

(A) a member of the Coast Guard;

(B) a civilian employee of the Coast Guard;

(C) a member of the Public Health Service who is assigned to the Coast Guard; or

(D) any other health-care professional credentialed and privileged at a Federal health-care institution or location specially designated by the Secretary; and

(2) who—

(A) has a current license to practice medicine, osteopathic medicine, dentistry, or another health profession; and

(B) is performing authorized duties for the Coast Guard.

(c) Definitions.—In this section, the terms "license" and "health-care professional" have the meanings given those terms in section 1094(e) of title 10.

(Added Pub. L. 115–282, title III, §305(a), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4245.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 508 was renumbered section 2711 of this title.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 701 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to reauthorize the 

Chesapeake Bay Program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 7, 2019 

Mr. CARDIN (for himself and Mrs. CAPITO) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to reauthorize the Chesapeake Bay Program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Chesapeake Bay Pro5 gram Reauthorization Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 701 IS

1 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF CHESAPEAKE BAY PRO2 GRAM. 

3 Section 117 of the Federal Water Pollution Control 

4 Act (33 U.S.C. 1267) is amended by striking subsection 

5 (j) and inserting the following: 

6 ‘‘(j) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

7 are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this sec8 tion— 

9 ‘‘(1) for fiscal year 2020, $90,000,000; 

10 ‘‘(2) for fiscal year 2021, $90,500,000; 

11 ‘‘(3) for fiscal year 2022, $91,000,000; 

12 ‘‘(4) for fiscal year 2023, $91,500,000; and 

13 ‘‘(5) for fiscal year 2024, $92,000,000.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE

REGINALD ARLEIGH NOBLE,

RELATOR.

 §

§

§

§

§

No. 08-11-00185-CR

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING 

IN MANDAMUS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator has filed a petition for writ of mandamus, complaining of the district clerk’s

failure to forward a notice of appeal to this Court. The petition does not comply with the rules

governing original proceedings. See TEX.R.APP.P. 52.3(j), (k). Moreover, the petition indicates

that Relator is attempting to appeal the denial of habeas relief from a felony conviction in Dallas

County. We may issue a writ of mandamus to a district clerk only if it is necessary to enforce our

jurisdiction. See TEX.GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(a)(West 2004); In re Washington, 7 S.W.3d

181, 182 (Tex.App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, orig. proceeding). Absent an order transferring a

case to this Court, we do not have jurisdiction over appeals from Dallas County. See TEX.GOV’T

CODE ANN. § 22.201(i)(West Supp. 2010). We also lack jurisdiction over matters related to

post-conviction writs of habeas corpus. See Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241,

243 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991); In re McAfee, 53 S.W.3d 715, 718 (Tex.App.--Houston [1st Dist.]

2001, orig. proceeding). For these reasons, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. 

Relator’s motion for temporary relief is also denied.
-2-

June 29, 2011

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Chief Justice

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)
NJ 126 Petition of 9/17/10 Proposed Rule: Air Quality Modeling Data DVD 

EPA has placed in the docket a DVD containing certain air quality modeling data files that were 

used for the NJ126 Petition proposal. 

Information on the air quality modeling performed in support of this proposed rule, including a 

summary of the model inputs and results, can be found in the Air Quality Modeling Technical 

Support Document that is located in the NJ126 Petition docket. 

The following information is contained on this data DVD: 

I. AERMET meteorological preprocessor files 

a. AERMET runstream files for Portland Plant site-specific meteorological 

data with adjusted measurement heights 

b. Raw upper air, NWS surface, and Portland Plant site-specific meteorological 

input files 

c. AERMET surface and profile output files (for input to AERMOD) 

II. AERMAP terrain preprocessor files 

a. AERMAP runstream files for initial coarse receptor grid and fine receptor 

grid 

b. Raw NED terrain input data file 

c. AERMAP receptor output files with receptor elevations and hill height scales 

for initial coarse receptor grid and fine receptor grid (for input to 

AERMOD) 

III. Ambient SO2 data for Chester, NJ monitor for 2007-2009 used for determining 

monitored background concentrations for cumulative modeling analyses 

IV. AERMOD model input files 

a. AERMOD runstream files for initial coarse receptor grid analysis 

b. AERMOD runstream files for fine receptor grid analysis 

c. AERMOD runstream files for fine receptor grid analysis with remedy 

V. AERMOD model output files 

a. AERMOD output files for initial coarse receptor grid analysis 

b. AERMOD output files for fine receptor grid analysis 

c. AERMOD output files for fine receptor grid analysis with remedy 

Requests for electronic copies of the NJ126 Petition air quality modeling data should be sent to 

Roger Brode (brode.roger@epa.gov) or Brian Timin (timin.brian@epa.gov).
#### § 4.90 Applicability and purpose.

This subpart implements section 30(b) of the Federal Power Act and provides procedures for obtaining an exemption for constructed or unconstructed small conduit hydroelectric facilities, as defined in § 4.30(b)(30), from all or part of the requirements of Part I of the Federal Power Act, including licensing, and the regulations issued under Part I.

[Order 800, 79 FR 59110, Oct. 1, 2014]
§ 367.1340 Account 134, Other special deposits. ( a ) This account must include deposits with fiscal agents or others for special purposes other than the payment of interest and dividends. The special deposits may include, among other things, cash deposited with federal, state, or municipal authorities as a guaranty for the fulfillment of obligations; cash deposited with trustees to be held until mortgaged property sold, destroyed, or otherwise disposed of is replaced; cash realized from the sale of the accounting service company's securities and deposited with trustees to be held until invested in property of the service company. Entries to this account must specify the purpose for which the deposit is made.
( b ) Assets available for general corporate purposes must not be included in this account. Further, deposits for more than one year, that are not offset by current liabilities, must be charged to account 128, Other special funds (§ 367.1280).