alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 366.23 FERC Form No. 60, Annual reports of centralized service companies, and FERC-61, Narrative description of service company functions. ( a ) *General* — ( 1 ) *FERC Form No. 60.* Unless otherwise exempted or granted a waiver by Commission rule or order pursuant to §§ 366.3 and 366.4, every centralized service company (*see* § 367.2 of this chapter) in a holding company system, regardless of whether that service company is providing services to a public utility, a natural gas company, or both, must file an annual report, FERC Form No. 60, as provided in § 369.1 of this chapter. Every report must be submitted on the FERC Form No. 60 then in effect and must be prepared in accordance with the instructions incorporated in that form.
( 2 ) *FERC-61.* Unless otherwise exempted or granted a waiver by Commission rule or order pursuant to §§ 366.3 and 366.4, every service company in a holding company system, including a special-purpose company (*e.g.*, a fuel supply company or a construction company), that does not file a FERC Form No. 60 shall instead file with the Commission by May 1, 2007 and by May 1 each year thereafter, a narrative description, FERC-61, of the service company's functions during the prior calendar year. In complying with this section, a holding company may make a single filing on behalf of all such service company subsidiaries.
( 3 ) For good cause shown, the Commission may extend the time within which any such report or narrative description required to be filed pursuant to paragraphs (a)(1) or (2) of this section is to be filed or waive the requirements applicable to any such report or narrative description.
( b ) *Transition period.* Service companies in holding company systems exempted from the requirements of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 (15 U.S.C. 79a *et seq.*) need not file an annual report, FERC Form No. 60, for calendar years 2005 through 2007, after which they must comply with the provisions of this section.
[Order 667-A, 71 FR 28457, May 16, 2006, as amended by Order 691, 72 FR 5174, Feb. 5, 2007; Order 731, 74 FR 68529, Dec. 28, 2009]
Exhibit 23.2

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

        We consent to the use of our report dated February 27, 1997 with
    respect to the financial statements of RETEC/TETRA L.C. as of December
    31, 1996 and 1995 and for the years then ended included in this Annual
    Report (Form 10-K) of Thermo Remediation Inc. for the year ended March
    29, 1997.

        We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the following
    Registration Statements of Thermo Remediation Inc. and each related
    Prospectus of our report dated February 27, 1997 with respect to the
    financial statements of RETEC/TETRA L.C. as of December 31, 1996 and 1995
    and for the years then ended included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
    for the year ended March 29, 1997.

               Registration Statement No. 33-92058 on Form S-8
               Registration Statement No. 33-85368 on Form S-8
               Registration Statement No. 33-85370 on Form S-8
               Registration Statement No. 33-85374 on Form S-8
               Registration Statement No. 33-85372 on Form S-8
               Registration Statement No. 33-80747 on Form S-8
               Registration Statement No. 33-80515 on Form S-8
               Registration Statement No. 33-92030 on Form S-3
               Registration Statement No. 33-77818 on Form S-3
               Registration Statement No. 33-80458 on Form S-3
               Registration Statement No. 33-81226 on Form S-3
               Registration Statement No. 333-00062 on Form S-3



                                                     Ernst & Young LLP



    Houston, Texas
    June 4, 1997
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

(X)   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

      For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012

                                             or

( )   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______ to _______

Commission file number        0-17679
BOSTON CAPITAL TAX CREDIT FUND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 128 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 128

  To terminate operation of the Extremely Low Frequency Communication 
                          System of the Navy.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 19, 1999

   Mr. Feingold (for himself, Mr. Kohl, Mr. Wyden, and Mr. Johnson) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To terminate operation of the Extremely Low Frequency Communication 
                          System of the Navy.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TERMINATION OF OPERATION OF THE EXTREMELY LOW FREQUENCY 
              COMMUNICATION SYSTEM.

    (a) Termination Required.--The Secretary of the Navy shall 
terminate the operation of the Extremely Low Frequency Communication 
System of the Navy.
    (b) Maintenance of Infrastructure.--The Secretary shall maintain 
the infrastructure necessary for resuming operation of the Extremely 
Low Frequency Communication System.
                                 <all>
```
#### Margaret Librizzi, Respondent, v Town of Huntington, Appellant.

[826 NYS2d 117]

*756In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Molia, J.), entered May 2, 2006, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In the instant action, the plaintiff seeks to recover damages allegedly sustained when she tripped as her shoe became caught in a pavement indentation on the roadway in front of 6 Denton Court in the Town of Huntington. Denton Court is a one-block street 370 feet long and 33 feet wide.

The Town moved for summary judgment dismissing the action on the ground that it had not received prior written notice of the defect, as required by former Huntington Town Code § 173-18. In support of its motion for summary judgment, the Town acknowledged that a “recognized exception to the prior written notice requirement is that the TOWN actually created the alleged defect” (see *Gerena v Town of Brookhaven,*280 AD2d 450 [2001]), and further acknowledged that the Town repaired potholes on Denton Court at various times up until the day of the accident. In support of the motion, it submitted records indicating that the Town repaired potholes on Denton Court less than 10 days before the accident and on the day of the accident itself. The Town claimed that none of its records “indicate the specific location or nature of any of the potholes or indentations that were repaired.” The Town submitted the deposition testimony of its highway project assistant who testified that town employees performed the repairs and the best person to answer questions about specific potholes would be the general foreman.

Contrary to the plaintiffs argument, the Town’s records of repairs do not satisfy the prior written notice requirement *(see Wilkie v Town of Huntington, 29*AD3d 898 [2006]). However, under the circumstances of this case, the Town’s submissions raised a triable issue of fact as to whether the Town caused or created the allegedly dangerous condition *(see Cabrera v City of New York,*21 AD3d 1047, 1048 [2005]). Therefore, the Town failed to establish its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Miller, J.E, Goldstein, Skelos and Fisher, JJ., concur.
#### § 93.213 Appearance of disease among poultry in quarantine.

If any contagious disease appears among poultry during the quarantine period special precautions shall be taken to prevent spread of the infection to other poultry in the quarantine station or to those outside the grounds. The affected poultry shall be disposed of as the Administrator may direct, depending upon the nature of the disease.
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 31, 2013.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 13

- 00625

- CV

WILLIAM AND HOPE DAD ZIE , Appellant s

V. WELLS FARGO BANK, N. A., AS TRUSTEE FOR T HE CERTIFICATE HOLDERS OF MORGAN ST ANLEY ABS CAPITAL I IN C. TRUST 2005

- WMC3 MORTGAGE PASS

- THROUGH CERTIFICATES , SERIES 2005

- WMC3 , Appellee

On Appeal from the Co unty Civil C our t at Law No

. 2

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1018834



### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Appellants filed a notice of appeal on July 19, 20 13, seeking to appeal an order signed June 28, 2013, denying their motion to reduce the supersedeas bond2

amount set by the trial court

. No record has been filed

. 1

On July 31, 2013, the court reporter for this case advised the court that appellants are not appealing as indigent and they have not made payment arrangements for preparation of the record. On September 6, 2013, the county clerk advised the court that appellants have not made payment arrangements for preparation of the clerk’s record. Our records also reflect that appellants have not paid the appellate filing fee of $175.00. Therefore, on September 9, 2013, the court
issued an order directing appellants to pay the appellate filing fee and to provide proof of payment for preparation of the record b y September 25, 2013, or the appeal would be dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 ; 37.3(b)

. Appellants filed no

response.
Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices McCally, Busby, and Wise.

1 While it appears that an order on a supe rsedeas bond would not be appealable in the absence of

an appeal from the final judgment, see Tex. R. App. P. 24.2(a), we are unable to ascertain our jurisdiction over this appeal without a record.
### §3711. National Technology and Innovation Medal

#### (a) Establishment

There is hereby established a National Technology and Innovation Medal, which shall be of such design and materials and bear such inscriptions as the President, on the basis of recommendations submitted by the Office of Science and Technology Policy, may prescribe.

#### (b) Award

The President shall periodically award the medal, on the basis of recommendations received from the Secretary or on the basis of such other information and evidence as he deems appropriate, to individuals or companies, which in his judgment are deserving of special recognition by reason of their outstanding contributions to the promotion of technology or technological manpower for the improvement of the economic, environmental, or social well-being of the United States.

#### (c) Presentation

The presentation of the award shall be made by the President with such ceremonies as he may deem proper.

(Pub. L. 96–480, §16, formerly §12, Oct. 21, 1980, 94 Stat. 2319; renumbered §16, Pub. L. 99–502, §2, Oct. 20, 1986, 100 Stat. 1785; renumbered §15, Pub. L. 99–502, §9(e)(1), Oct. 20, 1986, 100 Stat. 1797; renumbered §16, Pub. L. 100–418, title V, §5122(a)(1), Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1438; Pub. L. 110–69, title I, §1003, Aug. 9, 2007, 121 Stat. 576.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2007—Pub. L. 110–69, §1003(1), which directed substitution of "National Technology and Innovation Medal" for "National Medal" in section catchline, was executed by making the substitution for "National Technology Medal" to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 110–69, §1003(2), substituted "Technology and Innovation Medal" for "Technology Medal".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### National Technology Medal for Environmental Technology

Pub. L. 105–309, §10, Oct. 30, 1998, 112 Stat. 2939, provided that: "In the administration of section 16 of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 (15 U.S.C. 3711), Environmental Technology shall be established as a separate nomination category with appropriate unique criteria for that category."
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 49 (Monday, March 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13664-13665]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5649]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-75,147]


Elkay Manufacturing, Broadview, IL; Amended Certification 
Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(``Act''), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a 
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance 
on February 16, 2011, applicable to workers of Elkay Manufacturing, 
Broadview, Illinois. The notice will be published soon in the Federal 
Register.
    At the request of the State Agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged 
in the production of stainless steel sinks, counters, and cabinets.
    The review shows that on December 29, 2008, a certification of 
eligibility to apply for adjustment assistance was issued for all 
workers of Elkay Manufacturing Company, Broadview, Illinois, separated 
from employment on or after December 8, 2007 through December 29, 2010. 
The notice was published in the Federal Register on January 26, 2009 
(74 FR 4463).
    In order to avoid an overlap in worker group coverage, the 
Department is amending the January 28, 2010 impact date established for 
TA-W-75,147, to read December 30, 2010.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-75,147 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Elkay Manufacturing, Broadview, Illinois, who 
became totally or partially separated from employment on or after 
December 30, 2010, through February 16, 2013, and all workers in the 
group threatened with total or partial separation from employment on 
date of certification through two years from the date of 
certification, are eligible to apply for

[[Page 13665]]

adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act 
of 1974, as amended.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 23rd day of February 2011.
Elliott S. Kushner,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011-5649 Filed 3-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
§ 3.163 Primary conveyances (motor vehicle, rail, air, and marine). ( a ) The animal cargo space of primary conveyances used in transporting live birds must be designed, constructed, and maintained in a manner that at all times protects the health and well-being of the animals transported in them, ensures their safety and comfort, and prevents the entry of exhaust from the primary conveyance during transportation.
( b ) The animal cargo space must have a supply of air that is sufficient for the normal breathing of all the animals being transported in it.
( c ) Each primary enclosure containing birds must be positioned in the animal cargo space in a manner that provides protection from the elements and that allows each bird enough air for normal breathing.
( d ) During transportation, the climatic conditions in the animal cargo area shall be maintained in accordance with the requirements of § 3.168.
( e ) Primary enclosures must be positioned in the primary conveyance in a manner that allows the birds to be quickly and easily removed from the primary conveyance in an emergency.
( f ) The interior of the bird cargo space must be kept clean.
( g ) Live birds may not be transported with any material, substance (*e.g.,* dry ice), or device which may reasonably be expected to be injurious to the health and well-being of the birds unless proper precaution is taken to prevent such injury.
# C_2011030EN.01004102.xml

| 29.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/41

---

Action brought on 12 November 2010 — Google v OHIM — Giersch Ventures (GMail)

(Case T-527/10)

()

2011/C 30/75

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Google, Inc. (Wilmington, United States) (represented by: M. Kinkeldey and A. Bognár, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Giersch Ventures LLC (Los Angeles, United States)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 8 September 2010 in case R 342/2010-4; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 8 September 2010 in case R 342/2010-4; and

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark “GMail”, for goods and services in classes 9, 38 and 42 — Community trade mark application No 5685136

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited: German trade mark registration No 30666860 of the word mark ‘G-mail’, registered for, among others, goods and services in classes 9, 38 and 42; German trade mark registration No 30025697 of the figurative mark ‘G-mail ... und die Post geht richtig ab’, for services in classes 38, 39 and 42.

Mark or sign cited:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: The applicant considers that the contested decision infringes Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal erred (i) in its visual comparison between the contested trade mark and the earlier opposed trade mark, (ii) in not taking into account the perception of the concerned consumer circles, (iii) in its assumption that the word elements of composite marks are always more coining than the visual elements, and disregarded case law in that respect, (iv) in its finding that the earlier word mark as a whole was not to be considered intrinsically weak, and (v) in its finding that the applicant’s arguments as regards the significance of the visual comparison over the phonetic comparison of the marks were inconclusive.

Pleas in law:

---
§ 1308.26 Appeals. ( a ) An appeal to the Board from a Contracting Officer's decision under § 1308.12 shall be initiated within 90 days from the Contractor's receipt of the Contracting Officer's decision and in the manner set forth in the disputes clause.
( b ) An appeal from the Contracting Officer's failure to render a timely decison shall be taken within the time period provided by § 1308.17. The notice of appeal shall be in the form and filed in the manner specified in the disputes clause, but shall state that it is an appeal under § 1308.17, and shall include a copy of the claim which was submitted for decision.
Limited Power of Attorney - Securities Law Compliance


The undersigned, as an officer and director of Solectron Corporation,
(the "Corporation"), hereby constitutes and appoints Tim Chu,
Nitaya Yamamoto, or Victoria Miranda the undersigned's true and lawful
attorney-in-fact and agent to complete and execute such Forms 3, 4
and 5 and other forms as such attorney-in-fact shall, in his or her
discretion, determine to be required or advisable pursuant to Section
16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (as amended) and the
rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, or any successor laws and
regulations, as a consequence of the undersigned's ownership,
acquisition or disposition of securities of the Corporation, and to
do all acts necessary in order to file such forms with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, any securities exchange or national
association, the Corporation and such other person or agency as the
attorney-in-fact shall deem appropriate. The undersigned hereby
ratifies and confirms all that said attorney-in-fact and agent shall
do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.


This Limited Power of Attorney is executed at San Jose, California,
as of the date set forth below.



			Signature:	S/ Michael R. Cannon

			Type or Print Name:	Michael R. Cannon

			Dated: 	January 3, 2005






Witness:

Signature:	S/ Carol Clark


Type or Print Name:	Carol Clark


Dated: January 3, 2005
#### § 1b.7 Procedure after investigation.

Where it appears that there has been or may be a violation of any of the provisions of the acts administered by the Commission or the rules, opinions or orders thereunder, the Commission may institute administrative proceedings, initiate injunctive proceedings in the courts, refer matters, where appropriate, to the other governmental authorities, or take other appropriate action.
§ 1317.530 Marital or parental status. ( a ) *General.* A recipient shall not apply any policy or take any employment action: ( 1 ) Concerning the potential marital, parental, or family status of an employee or applicant for employment that treats persons differently on the basis of sex; or
( 2 ) Which is based upon whether an employee or applicant for employment is the head of household or principal wage earner in such employee's or applicant's family unit.
( b ) *Pregnancy.* A recipient shall not discriminate against or exclude from employment any employee or applicant for employment on the basis of pregnancy, childbirth, false pregnancy, termination of pregnancy, or recovery therefrom.
( c ) *Pregnancy as a temporary disability.* Subject to § 1317235(d), a recipient shall treat pregnancy, childbirth, false pregnancy, termination of pregnancy, recovery therefrom, and any temporary disability resulting therefrom as any other temporary disability for all job-related purposes, including commencement, duration, and extensions of leave, payment of disability income, accrual of seniority and any other benefit or service, and reinstatement, and under any fringe benefit offered to employees by virtue of employment.
( d ) *Pregnancy leave.* In the case of a recipient that does not maintain a leave policy for its employees, or in the case of an employee with insufficient leave or accrued employment time to qualify for leave under such a policy, a recipient shall treat pregnancy, childbirth, false pregnancy, termination of pregnancy, and recovery therefrom as a justification for a leave of absence without pay for a reasonable period of time, at the conclusion of which the employee shall be reinstated to the status that she held when the leave began or to a comparable position, without decrease in rate of compensation or loss of promotional opportunities, or any other right or privilege of employment.
(a) (b) 

# N N(a) (b)

#   (a) (b)



## K(a) (b)

## K