alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 73.2 Interstate shipment for immediate slaughter from quarantined or nonquarantined areas; conditions under which permitted. ( a ) *Conditions under which permitted after one dipping.* Cattle which, just prior to shipment, were affected with scabies but have been dipped once in a permitted dip (other than a toxaphene dip), under the supervision of an APHIS inspector or State inspector, within 10 days prior to the date of shipment may be shipped or transported interstate for immediate slaughter to a recognized slaughtering center, upon compliance with the following conditions: ( 1 ) They shall not be diverted en route.
( 2 ) The means of conveyance shall be placarded and the billing shall be marked “Treated Scabby Cattle,” in accordance with § 73.6.
( b ) *After one dipping; to be slaughtered within 14 days or redipped by owner.* Cattle shipped interstate subject to the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section shall be slaughtered within 14 days from the date of the dipping or shall be again dipped by the owner.
( c ) *When part of diseased herd not visibly affected.* Cattle of the free area not visibly diseased with scabies, but which may be part of a diseased herd, may be shipped or transported interstate for immediate slaughter to any recognized slaughtering center where separate pens are provided for yarding exposed cattle: *Provided,* That means of conveyance in which the cattle are transported shall be placarded and the billing accompanying the shipment shall be marked “Cattle Exposed to Scabies” in accordance with § 73.6.
( d ) *Undiseased herds in quarantined area; conditions under which permitted.* Cattle of herds of the quarantined area which are not diseased with scabies may be shipped, transported, or otherwise moved interstate for immediate slaughter, upon inspection by an APHIS or State inspector within 10 days prior to the date of shipment and when accompanied by a certificate from such inspector showing the cattle to be free from disease.
[31 FR 8907, June 28, 1966, as amended at 36 FR 23996, Dec. 17, 1971; 38 FR 18011, July 6, 1973; 41 FR 5384, Feb. 6, 1976; 49 FR 10530, Mar. 20, 1984; 49 FR 33120, Aug. 21, 1984; 56 FR 52463, Oct. 21, 1991; 66 FR 21062, Apr. 27, 2001]
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 12, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 2128]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-582]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable materials, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Initial Review Group. Epidemiology, Prevention and 
Behavior Research Review Subcommittee.
    Date: March 29-30, 2011.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Ranga V. Srinivas, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 
Extramural Project Review Branch, 5635 Fishers Lane, Room 2085, 
Bethesda, MD 20892. 301-451-2067. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#85f6f7ecebecf3e4f7c5e8e4ece9abebecedabe2eaf3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bccfced5d2d5caddcefcd1ddd5d092d2d5d492dbd3ca">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants; 93.701, ARRA Related Biomedical 
Research and Research Support Awards, National Institutes of Health, 
HHS)

    Dated: January 6, 2011.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-582 Filed 1-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 354.144 Advance information.

Upon the request of an applicant, all or part of the contents of any inspection certificate issued to such applicant may be telephoned or telegraphed to him, or to any person designated by him, at his expense.
#### In the Matter of Larry Davis, Petitioner, v Glenn S. Goord, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.

[824 NYS2d 460]

Rose, J.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Ulster County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit violating a direct order, interfering with an employee and interfering with movement. The charges stemmed from an incident in which petitioner allegedly refused to comply with the request of a correction officer escort that petitioner not proceed ahead of him while walking down a corridor. After a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of the charges. Following an unsuccessful administrative appeal, petitioner commenced the instant proceeding to challenge that determination.

Contrary to petitioner’s contention, the misbehavior report and the hearing testimony of the correction officer who authored it provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see *Matter of Cunningham v Selsky,*29 AD3d 1254, 1255 [2006] ; *Matter of Martinez v Goord,*28 AD3d 839 [2006]). Petitioner’s claim that the misbehavior report was written in retaliation for a complaint that he made against the reporting correction officer created an issue of credibility for the Hearing Officer to resolve *(see Matter of Williams v Goord,*31 AD3d 1086, 1087 [2006]; *Matter of Larkins v Goord,*27 AD3d 810 [2006]).

*1028Petitioner’s claim that he was improperly denied the right to call certain witnesses is without merit. The record reveals that the proffered testimony was either irrelevant to the issue of petitioner’s guilt or redundant to prior testimony *(see Matter of Seymour v Goord,*24 AD3d 831, 832 [2005], *lv denied*6 NY3d 711 [2006]; *Matter of Burgos-Morales v Goord,*22 AD3d 999, 1000 [2005]). Although the Hearing Officer provided petitioner with numerous opportunities to call additional witnesses, petitioner did not request the testimony of the other witnesses at issue. Thus, it cannot be said that he was denied the right to call those witnesses *(see Matter of Davis v Goord,*21 AD3d 606, 608 [2005]). Finally, contrary to petitioner’s contention, the record establishes that the hearing was timely commenced and completed, with extensions appropriately sought and granted *(see*7 NYCRR 251-5.1; *Matter of Crosby v Selsky,*26 AD3d 571 [2006]).

Petitioner’s remaining contentions, including his allegations of ineffective employee assistance and hearing officer bias, have been reviewed and determined to be without merit.

Mercure, J.P, Spain, Mugglin and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-Kfor the fiscal year ending December 31, 2005 of Financial SecurityAssurance Holdings Ltd. (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph W. Simon,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

1.                The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|        | By:    | /s/ JOSEPH W. SIMON      |
|--------|--------|--------------------------|
|   |   | Chief Financial  Officer |
|   |   | March 28,  2006     |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

1

----
Exhibit 10.20


 


COMPENSATION INFORMATION FOR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS


 


The table below provides information regarding the target percentage
for Cash Incentive Bonuses for named executive officers of Website Pros, Inc.
for performance in 2008.


 


	
  Name

  	
   

  	
  Target Bonus

  (as a % of Annual Base Salary)

  	
   

  
	
  David L. Brown 

  	
   

  	
  90

  	
  %

  
	
  Chief Executive Officer

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Jeffrey M. Stibel 

  	
   

  	
  75

  	
  %

  
	
  President

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Kevin M. Carney 

  	
   

  	
  65

  	
  %

  
	
  Chief Financial Officer
## Adams. Kevin (OST) From: 

### Sent: To: 

### Cc: Subject: Matt Bemrich <mbemrich@mchsi.com> Tuesday, March 11, 2014 1:22 PM : :'.._,-: Schlemmer, Kevin (OST); Adams, Kevin (OST)
. , , . , . , Mayor@MasonCity.net; dfierke@fortdodgeiowa.org; 'RhondaChamoers' · DOCKET DOT-OST-2001-10682; Fort Dodge Request for Extension
DOCKET DOT-OST-2001-10682; Fort Dodge The City of Fort Dodge would like to formally request and extension tothe community comments period. The DOTorder requesting comments on proposals for our Essential AirService carrier ends March 14, 2014. While we are grateful that the DOT requested these proposals on an expedited basis, we will be requesting a 7-day extension to the comment period in orderto have more time to consider both proposals. Thankyou, 

### /V\C!tt 

### 1SeVVLrtcVI MC!t.JOV

## ofFort Dodge**I?~** :L.st**AVeV~.ue** soutlti Fortr::>oclge, lA 5050i 5i5-5;t-3-7J.-44 5i5-Eij3-5;t-5:L FAX

1
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Seeks Applications to Strengthen Community and Economic Development 

to Benefit All People in Rural Communities

WASHINGTON, Feb. 8, 2022 – U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Under Secretary for Rural 

Development Xochitl Torres Small today announced that USDA is accepting applications for grants that will

advance equity in rural communities through improvements in housing, community facilities, and community 

and economic development.

USDA is making the grants available under the Rural Community Development Initiative program. Qualified 

intermediaries may use the funds to improve housing and community facilities, and to implement community 

and economic development projects in rural areas.

USDA is offering priority points to projects that advance key priorities under the Biden-Harris Administration 

to help communities recover from the COVID-19 pandemic, advance equity and combat climate change. These 

extra points will increase the likelihood of funding for projects seeking to address these critical challenges in 

rural America.

Eligible applicants include public bodies and tribal authorities, nonprofit organizations and qualified for-profit

organizations.

Grants may be used to train sub-grantees to conduct educational training on homeownership or minority-owned

business entrepreneurship. The grants also may be used to provide technical assistance to sub-grantees on the 

following:

• strategic plan development

• accessing alternative funding sources

• training and resources for board operations, management, financial systems and information technology

Awardees must contribute matching funds equal to the amount of the grant.

Electronic applications will be accepted via Grants.gov. Electronic applications must be submitted by 

11:59 p.m. Eastern time on April 19, 2022.

The deadline for paper applications is 4 p.m. local time, April 25, 2022.

Additional information is available on page 7084 of the February 8 Federal Register or by contacting your local 

USDA Rural Development office.

If you’d like to subscribe to USDA Rural Development updates, visit our GovDelivery subscriber page. 
###

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
Editorial Note on Part 12
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 12 appear at 69 FR 32438, June 10, 2004.

§ 12.61 Definitions. For purposes of this subpart F: ( a ) *Chief Dam Safety Engineer* means the designated individual, who is a licensed professional engineer with experience in dam safety, who oversees the implementation of the Owner's Dam Safety Program and has primary responsibility for ensuring the safety of the licensee's dam(s) and other project works.
( b ) *Chief Dam Safety Coordinator* means the designated individual, who is not required to be a licensed professional engineer, who oversees the implementation of the Owner's Dam Safety Program and has primary responsibility for ensuring the safety of the licensee's dam(s) and other project works.
§ 1300.104 Sexual harassment. It is TVA policy that all TVA employees are responsible for assuring that the workplace is free from sexual harassment. Accordingly, all employees must avoid any action or conduct which could be viewed as sexual harassment including: ( a ) Unwelcome sexual advances;
( b ) Requests for sexual favors; and
( c ) Other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature when: ( 1 ) Submission to such conduct is made either explicitly or implicitly a term or condition of an individual's employment;
( 2 ) Submission to or rejection of such conduct by an individual is used as the basis for employment decisions affecting such individual; or
( 3 ) Such conduct has the purpose or effect of unreasonably interfering with an individual's work performance or creating an intimidating, hostile, or offensive working environment.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SANJIV GOEL, M.D., INC., a California

corporaiton,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY

PENSION AND HEALTH PLAN, a

California corporation,

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 15-56345

D.C. No. 

2:14-cv-02056-PSG-CW

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Philip S. Gutierrez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 7, 2017** 

Pasadena, California

Before: PAEZ, BERZON, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Sanjiv Goel appeals the district court’s ruling that the Motion Picture

Industry Pension and Health Plan did not abuse its discretion when it concluded

FILED

MAR 14 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
that the subject services he provided were not eligible for reimbursement as

emergency room services.1 We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we

affirm.

The Plan gives its directors discretion to decide eligibility for, and the extent

of, benefits provided by the Plan. For billing purposes, the Plan distinguishes

between “Emergency Room Services” and other services. The Plan reimburses for

non-emergency room services at a different rate than emergency room services.

Here, the disputed services were not provided in the emergency room but in

a separate location in the hospital, and were provided after the patient was admitted

to the hospital via the cardiac catheterization lab. It was not an abuse of discretion

for the plan administrators to conclude that the disputed services were not entitled

to reimbursement at the emergency room services rate. See Gatti v. Reliance

Standard Life Ins. Co., 415 F.3d 978, 981 (9th Cir. 2005). 

AFFIRMED.

1

 The parties are familiar with the facts so we do not repeat them here.

2
Amendment to Restricted Stock Award Contract between George Apostolou and HCI



 Exhibit 10.92 

AMENDMENT TO RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD CONTRACT 

The Restricted Stock Award Contract between HCI Group, Inc. (formerly Homeowners Choice, Inc.) and George Apostolou having a grant date of May 16, 2013
and by which 24,000 shares of HCI Group, Inc. restricted stock were awarded to Mr. Apostolou is hereby amended so that the portion of the award relating to 6,000 shares that would vest one year after the Fair Market Value equals or exceeds $50 per
share for 20 consecutive trading days is cancelled effective March 2, 2016. 
 Agreed to this 2nd
day of March 2016. 
  
  

			
	  
 George
Apostolou

	
	HCI Group, Inc.
		
	By:	 	  

		 	Paresh Patel, Chief Executive Officer
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 09**  **- 66**  **4 0** 

RICHARD AARON BLANKENSHIP, JR., Petitioner

– Appellant ,
v. R. DAVID MITCHELL, Superintendent, Mountain View Correctional Institution , Respondent

– Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Nort h Carolina , at Statesville
. Graham C. Mullen , Senior District Judge. ( 5 :0 9

- cv - 0 00 27

- GC M )

Submitted : April 1, 2010 Decided: April 13, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GR EGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Richard Aaron Blankenship, Jr. , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Richard A aron Blankenship, Jr. , seeks to appeal t he district court ’ s order d ismiss ing as untimely his 28 U.S.C.
§ 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability.
See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “ a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. ” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006) . A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. See Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683

- 84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Blankenship has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSE D
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5

<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                             460,111
<SECURITIES>                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                      353,608
<ALLOWANCES>                       0
<INVENTORY>                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   0
<PP&E>                             11,611,785     <F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                     813,898
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     11,611,606
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              142,283
<BONDS>                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0
<PREFERRED>                        0
<COMMON>                           11,469,323     <F2>
<OTHER-SE>                         0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       11,611,606
<SALES>                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   1,361,122      <F3>
<CGS>                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      492,253        <F4>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    0
<INCOME-TAX>                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                0
<DISCONTINUED>                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0
<CHANGES>                          0
<NET-INCOME>                       868,869
<EPS-BASIC>                      0
<EPS-DILUTED>                      0

<FN>
<F1>   "PP&E" REPRESENTS INVESTMENT IN REAL ESTATE [LAND AND
BUILDING]
<F2>   "COMMON" REPRESENTS TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
<F3>   "TOTAL REVENUES" REPRESENTS RENTAL, INTEREST, AND OTHER
INCOME
<F4>   "TOTAL COSTS" REPRESENTS TOTAL EXPENSES
</FN>


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

 

**Independent Auditors’Consent**

 

 

The Board of Directors 

CellStar Corporation: 

 

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-87754, 333-23381, 333-77415 and333-89298) of CellStar Corporation of our report dated January 10, 2003, except for the fourth paragraph of note 6, which is as of February 28, 2003, and note 23, which is as of January 31, 2003, relating to the consolidated balance sheets ofCellStar Corporation and subsidiaries as of November 30, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year periodended November 30, 2002, and the related schedule, which report appears in the November 30, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K of CellStar Corporation. 

 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

 

KPMG LLP 

 

 

Dallas, Texas 

February 28, 2003
#### § 95.35 Methods for disinfection of hides, skins, and other materials.

Hides, skins, and other materials required by the regulations in this part to be disinfected shall be subjected to disinfection by methods found satisfactory and approved from time to time by the Deputy Administrator, Veterinary Services.

[28 FR 5981, June 13, 1963. Redesignated at 78 FR 73003, Dec. 4, 2013]
#### § 533.6 Overtime and holiday inspection service.

The requirements governing overtime and holiday inspection service in 9 CFR 307.5 apply to fish processing establishments.