alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 78.21 Bison steers and spayed heifers.

Bison steers and spayed heifers may be moved interstate without further restriction under this subpart.

[51 FR 32580, Sept. 12, 1986, as amended at 78 FR 2070, Jan. 9, 2013]
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Chris D. Wheeler, President and Chief Executive Officer of Gables Residential Trust, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Gables Residential Trust;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant andwe have:

(a)        Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

(b)        Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on our evaluation; and

(c)        Disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a)        All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)        Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  March 12, 2004

    /s/ Chris D. Wheeler                              .

Name:  Chris D. WheelerTitle:    President and Chief Executive Officer
### §1665a. Use of annual percentage rate in oral disclosures; exceptions

In responding orally to any inquiry about the cost of credit, a creditor, regardless of the method used to compute finance charges, shall state rates only in terms of the annual percentage rate, except that in the case of an open end credit plan, the periodic rate also may be stated and, in the case of an other than open end credit plan where a major component of the finance charge consists of interest computed at a simple annual rate, the simple annual rate also may be stated. The Bureau may, by regulation, modify the requirements of this section or provide an exception from this section for a transaction or class of transactions for which the creditor cannot determine in advance the applicable annual percentage rate.

(Pub. L. 90–321, title I, §146, as added Pub. L. 93–495, title IV, §401(a), Oct. 28, 1974, 88 Stat. 1517; amended Pub. L. 96–221, title VI, §623(a), Mar. 31, 1980, 94 Stat. 185; Pub. L. 111–203, title X, §1100A(2), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 2107.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2010—Pub. L. 111–203 substituted "Bureau" for "Board".

1980—Pub. L. 96–221 substituted provisions relating to use of annual percentage rate in oral disclosures by creditors, for provisions setting forth requirements for advertisements concerning consumer credit repayable in more than four installments.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2010 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 111–203 effective on the designated transfer date, see section 1100H of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as a note under section 552a of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### Effective Date of 1980 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 96–221 effective on expiration of two years and six months after Mar. 31, 1980, with all regulations, forms, and clauses required to be prescribed to be promulgated at least one year prior to such effective date, and allowing any creditor to comply with any amendments, in accordance with the regulations, forms, and clauses prescribed by the Board prior to such effective date, see section 625 of Pub. L. 96–221, set out as a note under section 1602 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 93–495, title IV, §416, Oct. 28, 1974, 88 Stat. 1521, provided that: "This title [enacting this section and sections 1614 and 1645 of this title, amending sections 1603, 1607, 1635, 1637, 1640, and 1644 of this title, and enacting provision set out as a note under section 1640 of this title] takes effect upon the date of its enactment [Oct. 28, 1974], except that sections 409 [amending section 1631 of this title] and 411 [amending section 1637 of this title] take effect upon the expiration of one year after the date of its enactment [Oct. 28, 1974]."
§ 590.160 Clean Water Act; refusal, suspension, or withdrawal of service. ( a ) Any applicant for inspection at a plant where the operations thereof may result in any discharge into the navigable waters in the United States is required by subsection 401(a)(1) (33 U.S.C. 1341) of the Clean Water Act as amended (86 Stat. 816, 91 Stat. 1566, 33 U.S.C. 1251 *et seq.*), to provide the Administrator with a certification, as prescribed in said subsection, that any such discharge will comply with the applicable provisions of sections 301, 302, 303, 306, and 307 of the Act (33 U.S.C. 1311, 1312, 1313, 1316, and 1317). No grant of inspection can be issued unless such certification has been obtained, or is waived, because failure of refusal of the State, interstate agency, or the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to act on a request for certification within a reasonable period (which should not exceed 1 year after receipt of such a request). Further, upon receipt of an application for inspection and a certification as required by section 401(a)(1) of the Clean Water Act, the Administrator (as defined in § 590.5) is required by subparagraph (2) of said subsection to notify the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency for proceedings in accordance with that subsection. No grant of inspection can be made until the requirements of section 401(a)(1) and (2) have been met.
( b ) Inspection may be suspended or revoked and plant approval terminated as provided in section 401(a)(4) and (5) of the Clean Water Act, as amended (33 U.S.C. 1341(a)(4) and (5)).
[85 FR 68675, Oct. 29, 2020]
EXHIBIT 23.1


             CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

      We consent to the  incorporation by reference  in (1) the  Registration
 Statement on Form S-8 (Registration  No. 333-86749) pertaining to  1,975,000
 shares of  Dial-Thru International  Corporation common  stock, and  (2)  the
 Registration Statement on Form  S-8 (Registration No. 333-23313)  pertaining
 to 1,200,000 shares of Dial-Thru International Corporation common stock, and
 (3) the  Registration Statement  on Form  S-3 (Registration  No.  333-33523)
 pertaining to 863,364 shares  of Dial-Thru International Corporation  common
 stock, and (4) the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-
 36040 pertaining to 1,150,000 shares of Dial-Thru International  Corporation
 common stock, and (5) the Registration  Statement on Form S-3  (Registration
 No. 333-52870)  pertaining to  2,254,285 shares  of Dial-Thru  International
 Corporation common stock, of our report dated January 7, 2000, with  respect
 to the  financial  statements  of Dial-Thru  International  Corporation  and
 Subsidiaries for the year ended October 31, 2000.

                               /s/ KING GRIFFIN & ADAMSON P.C.
### §3003. Acceptance of interstate off-track wager

No person may accept an interstate off-track wager except as provided in this chapter.

(Pub. L. 95–515, §4, Oct. 25, 1978, 92 Stat. 1813.)
### §17. Antitrust laws not applicable to labor organizations

The labor of a human being is not a commodity or article of commerce. Nothing contained in the antitrust laws shall be construed to forbid the existence and operation of labor, agricultural, or horticultural organizations, instituted for the purposes of mutual help, and not having capital stock or conducted for profit, or to forbid or restrain individual members of such organizations from lawfully carrying out the legitimate objects thereof; nor shall such organizations, or the members thereof, be held or construed to be illegal combinations or conspiracies in restraint of trade, under the antitrust laws.

(Oct. 15, 1914, ch. 323, §6, 38 Stat. 731.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The antitrust laws, referred to in text, are defined in section 12 of this title.
# C_2010148EN.01003401.xml

| 5.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/34

---

Action brought on 18 March 2010 — Amecke Fruchtsaft v OHIM — Uhse (69 Sex up)

(Case T-125/10)

2010/C 148/59

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Amecke Fruchtsaft GmbH & Co. KG (Menden, Germany) (represented by: R. Kaase and J.-C. Plate, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Beate Uhse Einzelhandels GmbH (Flensburg, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare the application, together with the annexes submitted, made against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 January 2010 in Case R 612/2009-1, admissible; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare the application, together with the annexes submitted, made against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 January 2010 in Case R 612/2009-1, admissible; and

| — | Annul the contested decision on the ground of incompatibility with Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94; (1) |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the contested decision on the ground of incompatibility with Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94; (1)

1

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings, including the costs before the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings, including the costs before the Board of Appeal.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Beate Uhse Einzelhandels GmbH

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘69 Sex up’ for goods and services in Classes 3, 5, 9, 29, 30, 32, 33, 38 and 41 (application No 5 418 108)

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: German word mark ‘sex:h:up’ No 305 31 669.9 for goods in Classes 5, 29, 30 and 32

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: To uphold the opposition for all disputed goods

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: To rescind the contested decision and reject the opposition

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94, since there is a likelihood of confusion between the conflicting marks

Pleas in law:

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

1

---
### §4502. Identification and disbursement of restitutionary amounts

#### (a) In general

(1) Subject to paragraph (2)—

(A) all rulings, policies, or other statements (including any administrative order or settlement agreement) issued after October 21, 1986, by any office, official, or employee of the Department of Energy; and

(B) all orders, including declaratory judgments, issued by any court after October 21, 1986,

shall be consistent with the provisions of this chapter.

(2) Nothing in this section shall affect the settlement approved on July 7, 1986, in In Re: the Department of Energy Stripper Well Exemption Litigation, M.D.L. No. 378, in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas.

#### (b) to (d) Repealed. Pub. L. 99–509, title III, §3003(e), as added Pub. L. 105–277, div. A, §101(e) [title III, §337], Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–231, 2681–295

#### (e) Repeal of subsections (b) to (d); equitable distribution of escrow remainder to claimants

Subsections (b), (c), and (d) of this section are repealed, and any rights that may have arisen are extinguished, on the date of the enactment of the Department of the Interior and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1999. After that date, the amount available for direct restitution to current and future refined petroleum product claimants under this chapter is reduced by the amounts specified in title II of that Act as being derived from amounts held in escrow under section 4501(d) of this title. The Secretary shall assure that the amount remaining in escrow to satisfy refined petroleum product claims for direct restitution is allocated equitably among the claimants.

(Pub. L. 99–509, title III, §3003, Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 1882; Pub. L. 105–277, div. A, §101(e) [title III, §337], Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–231, 2681–295.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Department of the Interior and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1999, referred to in subsec. (e), is section 101(e) of div. A of Pub. L. 105–277, Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–231. Provisions of title II of the Act relating to amounts held in escrow under section 4501(d) of this title (112 Stat. 2681–276) are not classified to the Code. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (e), was in the original "this Act", which was translated as meaning this subtitle, which enacted this chapter, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

#### Amendments

1998—Subsecs. (b) to (e). Pub. L. 105–277 added subsec. (e) which struck out subsec. (b) relating to disbursement of restitutionary amounts as direct restitution to injured persons, subsec. (c) relating to determination of excess amount to be used for indirect restitution, and subsec. (d) relating to disbursement of excess amount as indirect restitution for energy conservation programs.
### Fw: Test Results from Albemarle A 1 -Melting Point Paul Campanella to: John Schaeffer 03/29/2012 03:20 PM



### Answer from Daniel to accept this test.

----- Forwarded by Paul Campanella/DC/USEPA/US on 03/29/2012 03:19 PM -----
From: Chuantung Lin/DC/USEPA/US To: Paul Campanella/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Tracy Williamson/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Myrta Christian/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 03/29/2012 01:14 PM Subject: Re: Test Results from Albemarle A 1 -Melting Point 

### Paul, I have reviewed the submitted M.P. data from the sponsor of this chemical. The measured value of M.P. is below 0 o 

### C ( i.e. , -21.60 o 

### C) which indicating the substance is a liquid form at the room temperature. It is the freezing point temperature and could be used as the M.P. to fulfill the M.P. data endpoint requirement. Therefore, this value is acceptable to meet HPV 2 testing rules requirement. Please let me know if you have further question on this matter. Thanks! Daniel
Paul Campanella 03/28/2012 03:18:02 PM Daniel , the attachment contains data for the A1...
From: Paul Campanella/DC/USEPA/US To: Chuantung Lin/DC/USEPA/US Date: 03/28/2012 03:18 PM Subject: Test Results from Albemarle A 1 -Melting Point 

### Daniel , the attachment contains data for the A1 Melting point testing submitted by Albemarle on CASRN 68479-98-1. Please review for acceptability. The remain information will be assessed by RAD.

HPV 2 Albemarle Test Data A1 CAS 68479-98-1 .pd f Albemarle 68479-98-1
1

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 271 [FRL ] New Mexico: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste Management Program Revisions AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ACTION: Proposed rule SUMMARY: The State of New Mexico has applied to EPA for Final authorization of the changes to its hazardous waste program under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). EPA proposes to grant Final Authorization to the State of New Mexico. In the “Rules and Regulations” section of this Federal Register, EPA is authorizing the changes by an immediate final rule. EPA did not make a proposal prior to the immediate final rule because we believe this action is not controversial and do not expect comments that oppose it. We have explained the reasons for this authorization in the preamble to the immediate final rule. Unless we get written comments which oppose this authorization during the comment period, the immediate final rule will become effe ctive on the date it establishes, and we will not take further action on this proposal. If we receive comments that oppose this action, we will withdraw the immediate final rule and it will not take effect. We will then respond to public comments in a la ter final rule based on this proposal. You may not have another opportunity for comment. If yo u want to comment on this action, y ou must do so at this time.DATES: Send y our written comments by [insert date 30 days after the date of publication in

the FR] . ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Alima Patterson, Region 6, Regional Authorization Coordinator, (6PD
- O), Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division, at the address shown below. You can examine copies of the materials submitted by the State of New Mexico during normal business hours at the following locations: New Mexico Environment Department, 2905 Rodeo Park Drive East, Building 1, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87505
- 6303, phone number (505) 476 - 6035 and EPA, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Te xas 75202 - 2733, phone number (214) 665
- 8533, comments may also be submitted electronically or through hand delivery /courier; please follow the detailed instructions in the ADDRESSES section of the immediate final rule which is located in the Rules section of this Federal Register. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alima Patterson (214) 665
- 8533. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For additional information, please see the immediate final rule published in the “Rules and Regulations” section of this Federal Regis ter . Dated: October 12, 2010 BILLING CODE 6560 - 5 - P

____________________________ Al Armendariz, Regional Administrator

. Region 6
### §4017. Guidelines

#### (a) Issuance; content

To promote greater certainty regarding the application of the antitrust laws to export trade, the Secretary, with the concurrence of the Attorney General, may issue guidelines—

(1) describing specific types of conduct with respect to which the Secretary, with the concurrence of the Attorney General, has made or would make, determinations under sections 4013 and 4014 of this title, and

(2) summarizing the factual and legal bases in support of the determinations.

#### (b) Administrative rulemaking requirements not applicable

Section 553 of title 5 shall not apply to the issuance of guidelines under subsection (a).

(Pub. L. 97–290, title III, §307, Oct. 8, 1982, 96 Stat. 1244.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 8, 1982, see section 312 of Pub. L. 97–290, set out as a note under section 4011 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> CT
<CIK> 0000835095
<NAME> BOSTON CAPITAL TAX CREDIT FUND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,057,796
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,057,796
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,250
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,856,791)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,852,541)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
§ 2.500 Penalty reduction/waiver policy for small entities. ( a ) It is the policy of the Commission that any small entity is eligible to be considered for a reduction or waiver of a civil penalty if it has no history of previous violations, and the violations at issue are not the product of willful or criminal conduct, have not caused loss of life or injury to persons, damage to property or the environment or endangered persons, property or the environment. An eligible small entity will be granted a waiver if it can also demonstrate that it performed timely remedial efforts, made a good faith effort to comply with the law and did not obtain an economic benefit from the violations. An eligible small entity that cannot meet the criteria for waiver of a civil penalty may be eligible for consideration of a reduced penalty. Upon the request of a small entity, the Commission will consider the entity's ability to pay before assessing a civil penalty.
( b ) Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section, the Commission reserves the right to waive or reduce civil penalties in appropriate individual circumstances where it determines that a waiver or reduction is warranted by the public interest.
[Order 594, 62 FR 15830, Apr. 3, 1997]
§ 1301.53 General. ( a ) No employee shall appear, in response to a demand for official records or information, in any proceeding to which this part applies to provide testimony and/or produce records or other official information without prior authorization as set forth in this part.
( b ) This part is intended only to provide procedures for responding to demands for testimony or production of records or other official information, and is not intended to, does not, and may not be relied upon to, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable by any party against TVA and the United States.
### SUBCHAPTER VI—STANDARD BARRELS