alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-75,147]

                    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (“Act”), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance on February 16, 2011, applicable to workers of Elkay Manufacturing, Broadview, Illinois. The notice will be published soon in the                     **Federal Register.**

At the request of the State Agency, the Department reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged in the production of stainless steel sinks, counters, and cabinets.

                    The review shows that on December 29, 2008, a certification of eligibility to apply for adjustment assistance was issued for all workers of Elkay Manufacturing Company, Broadview, Illinois, separated from employment on or after December 8, 2007 through December 29, 2010. The notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on January 26, 2009 (74 FR 4463).                

In order to avoid an overlap in worker group coverage, the Department is amending the January 28, 2010 impact date established for TA-W-75,147, to read December 30, 2010.

The amended notice applicable to TA-W-75,147 is hereby issued as follows:

                        All workers of Elkay Manufacturing, Broadview, Illinois, who became totally or partially separated from employment on or after December 30, 2010, through February 16, 2013, and all workers in the group threatened with total or partial separation from employment on date of certification through two years from the date of certification, are eligible to apply for                               ( print page 13665)                            adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.                    

Signed in Washington, DC, this 23rd day of February 2011.

Elliott S. Kushner,

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2011-5649 Filed 3-11-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
§ 22.22 Accelerated and Small Claims Procedures [Rule 22]. ( a ) *Variation from standard proceedings.* The ultimate purpose of any Board proceeding is to resolve fairly and expeditiously any dispute properly before the Board. The Board may at any time during an appeal modify the procedures contained in these rules if it is deemed feasible and furthers the resolution of the issue(s) in controversy.
( b ) *Accelerated procedure.* The accelerated procedure is available solely at the appellant's election, and only when the monetary amount in dispute is $100,000 or less. Such election shall be made no later than 15 days after receipt of the government's answer to the complaint, unless the Board enlarges the time for good cause shown. Promptly after receiving a timely filed election, the Board shall establish a schedule of proceedings that will allow for the timely resolution of the appeal. Pleadings may be simplified, discovery and other pre-hearing activities may be restricted or eliminated, and the appeal may be decided by a single member of the Board. Either party's failure to adhere to the Board's schedule may result in the Board drawing evidentiary inferences adverse to the party at fault. Whenever possible, the Board shall resolve an appeal under this procedure within 180 days from the Board's receipt of the election.
( c ) *Small claims procedure.* The small claims procedure is available solely at the appellant's election, and only when the monetary amount in dispute is $50,000 or less (or in the case of a small business concern is $150,000 or less). Such election shall be made no later than 15 days after receipt of the government's answer to the complaint, unless the Board enlarges the time for good cause shown. Promptly after receiving a timely filed election, the Board shall establish a schedule of proceedings that will allow for the timely resolution of the appeal. Pleadings may be simplified, discovery and other pre-hearing activities may be restricted or eliminated, and the appeal may be decided by a single member of the Board. Either party's failure to adhere to the Board's schedule may result in the Board drawing evidentiary inferences adverse to the party at fault. Whenever possible, the Board shall resolve an appeal under this procedure within 120 days from the Board's receipt of the election.
EXHIBIT 32.2

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gouverneur Bancorp Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
J. Twyman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by
                  the Report.


May 8, 2008                       By: /s/ Robert J. Twyman
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Robert J. Twyman
                                      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code in accordance with Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall
not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be
deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act
of 1933 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.


                                       32
#### § 72.22 Cars, vehicles, and premises; cleaning and treatment after containing infested or exposed animals.

Cars and other vehicles, and yards, pens, chutes, or other premises or facilities, which have contained interstate shipments of animals infested with or exposed to ticks, shall be cleaned and treated within 72 hours of use and prior to further use in the required concentration with a permitted dip listed in § 72.13 under supervision of a State or Federal inspector or an accredited veterinarian.

[38 FR 21996, Aug. 15, 1973]
Exhibit 20.1



Creation Date Mon Jun  1, 1998  04:03 PM                            Page    1
CMB95A

From: The Chase Manhattan Bank

To:   Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.


                   MONTHLY CERTIFICATEHOLDER'S REPORT
                   ----------------------------------

Due Period 33 Beginning Date                     05/01/1998
Due Period 33 End Date                           05/31/1998
Determination Date                               06/10/1998
Remittance Date                                  06/15/1998


I.    Monthly Principal and Principal Carryover Shortfall to Certificateholders
      (Per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                  $ 13.9075786096

II.   Monthly Interest and Unpaid Interest to Certificateholders
      (Per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                   $ 0.8901848808

III.  Monthly Expenses Summary

      A. Servicing Fee Disbursement                                $ 222,596.61
      B. Cash Collateral Account Expense                                 $ 0.00
      C. Total Expenses paid
         (per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                $ 0.1483641446

IV.   Cash Collateral Account Deposit Amount                             $ 0.00

V.    Outstanding Advance Summary

      A. From Prior Period                                       $ 3,842,534.15
      B. From Current Period                                     $ 3,930,320.28
      C. Change in Amount Between Periods (Lines B - A)             $ 87,786.13

VI.   Pool Factor Information

      A. Certificate Principal Balance                         $ 246,249,844.73
      B. Initial Certificate Balance                         $ 1,500,339,658.38
      C. Pool Factor (Lines A / B)                               0.164129397870

VII.  Available Cash Collateral Account Information for Due Period

      A. Available Cash Collateral Amount                       $ 13,355,796.82
      B. Available Cash Collateral Amount Percentage            4.999999998690%

VIII. Required Cash Collateral Amount

      A. For the Current Collection Period                      $ 13,355,796.82
      B. For the Next Collection Period                         $ 12,312,492.24
# C_2010346EN.01002602.xml

| 18.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 346/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 346/26

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Lombardia Sezione Terza (Italy) lodged on 5 July 2010 — E.On Energy Trading SpA v Autorità Per l’Energia Elettrica e il Gas

(Case C-333/10)

()

2010/C 346/44

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Lombardia — Sezione Terza

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: E.On Energy Trading SpA

Applicant:

Defendant: Autorità Per l’Energia Elettrica e il Gas

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Do Articles 23, 43, 49 and 56 of the Treaty and Article 11(2) and (6) and Article 24 of Directive 54/03/EC (1) preclude national legislation which, without the European Commission having been notified, requires on a permanent basis certain electricity producers which are, in certain circumstances, essential for the purpose of meeting the requirements of the demand for dispatching services, to submit bids on the energy exchange markets, in accordance with programmes determined by the network operator in accordance with external rules, and which prevents producers from freely determining the remuneration for such bids by linking the remuneration to criteria that have not been pre-determined according to transparent, non-discriminatory and market-based procedures?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2003 L 176, p. 37

1

---
#### § 1b.9 Confidentiality of investigations.

All information and documents obtained during the course of an investigation, whether or not obtained pursuant to subpoena, and all investigative proceedings shall be treated as nonpublic by the Commission and its staff except to the extent that (a) the Commission directs or authorizes the public disclosure of the investigation; (b) the information or documents are made a matter of public record during the course of an adjudicatory proceeding; or (c) disclosure is required by the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552. Procedures by which persons submitting information to the Commission during the course of an investigation may specifically seek confidential treatment of information for purposes of Freedom of Information Act disclosure are set forth in 18 CFR part 3b and § 1b.20. A request for confidential treatment of information for purposes of Freedom of Information Act disclosure shall not, however, prevent disclosure for law enforcement purposes or when disclosure is otherwise found appropriate in the public interest and permitted by law.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         731,943
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,543,601
<ALLOWANCES>                                    23,400
<INVENTORY>                                  1,506,554
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,868,486
<PP&E>                                       1,945,831
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,079,954
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,806,647
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,484,265
<BONDS>                                      3,534,250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,292
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,216,160)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,806,647
<SALES>                                      3,912,040
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,367,616
<CGS>                                        2,717,018
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,620,759
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               537,453
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             129,437
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                220,126
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            220,126
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   220,126
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Information Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on May 10, 2004 (the “Report”), I, Vincent A. Chippari, ExecutiveVice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| May 10, 2004 | /s/ Vincent A. Chippari                                                              |   |
|--------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|         | Vincent A. Chippari                                                                  |
|         | Executive Vice President  and Chief Financial Officer  (Principal Financial Officer) |

 

 

A signed originalstatement of this written statement required by Section 906, or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signaturethat appears in typed form within the electronic version of this writtenstatement required by Section 906, has been provided to InformationHoldings Inc. and will be retained by Information Holdings Inc. and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    1,458,062
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     43,090
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         177,886
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        35,936
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,714,974
<COMMON>                                       308,140
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                        (594)
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            321,065
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 628,611
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     40,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           545,980
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              55,600
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                       21
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 444,762
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                1,714,974
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      686,400
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            43,426
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     536,373
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     579,799
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        106,601
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              11,725
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 118,326
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        42,273
<NET-INCOME>                                    76,053
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   76,053
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        63,534
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       36,095
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         146,863
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.01
        

</TABLE>
#### THOMAS J. DAVIS, Plaintiff v. LEWERS *&*COOKE, Defendant

Civil No. 942-75

Superior Court of Guam

October 1, 1975

ABBATE, *Judge*

DECISION

Defendant’s motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction must be denied. The relevant code sections for analyzing this issue in controversy are Sections 406.1 and 405 of the Civil Code. Briefly, these sections allow for jurisdiction to be obtained over a foreign corporation “doing business in Guam” by serving process on the Director of Revenue and Taxation where such a corporation has not, pursuant to Section 405, designated an individual residing in Guam to accept summons and process. .

The operative words which fashion the gravamen of defendant’s motion are those of “doing business in Guam”. Succinctly stated defendant’s contention is that it has never been doing business in Guam and therefore is not subject to Civil Code Section 406.1.

“Doing business” as a legal phrase of art has been *298construed countless times by almost every court including the U.S. Supreme Court in *McGee v. International Life Insurance Co.,*355 U.S. 220 (1957). This phrase has been traditionally defined in terms of “minimum contacts with the forum state so that maintenance of the suit does not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice”. *International Shoe Co. v. State of Washington,*326 U.S. 310 (1945). Equally traditional in terms of adoption by other jurisdictions as a definition for this phrase is what it must consist of:

> An act done or transaction consummated in the forum state or some other act by which the defendant purposely avails itself of the privilege of conducting activities within the forum state, thus invoking the benefits and protections of its laws. *Hanson v. Denckla,*357 U.S. 235 (1958).

Applying these definitions to the case at hand it would seem from the fact that the contract was entered into in Guam, that the services which were the subject matter of the contract were rendered in Guam, that there were numerous meetings between the parties on Guam, and that there were continuous correspondence and communications between the plaintiff on Guam with the defendant, that these activities of the defendant could be said to constitute sufficient “minimum contacts” as to fall within the nearly universal definition of doing business. See *Ault v. Dinner for Two, Inc.,*27 Cal.App.3d 148 (1972).

With respect to defendant’s allegation that the Superior Court is without subject matter jurisdiction, the court merely asserts that per operation of Section 55 of Public Law 12-235 it is vested with subject matter jurisdiction over this matter.

For the foregoing reasons the defendant’s motion to dismiss is denied.

Submit order.