alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

Notice is hereby given that the Order revoking the following license is being rescinded by the Federal Maritime Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. Chapter 409) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR Part 515.

License Number: 020667N.

Name: Atlas Logistics (U.S.A.), Inc.

Address: 2401 E. Atlantic Blvd., Suite 310, Pompano Beach, FL 33062.

Order Published: FR: 12/22/10 (Volume 75, No. 245, Pg. 80501).

Sandra L. Kusumoto,

Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.

[FR Doc. 2011-575 Filed 1-12-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
§ 270.302 Occluded natural gas produced from coal seams. A person seeking a determination that natural gas is occluded natural gas produced from coal seams must file an application with the jurisdictional agency which contains the following items: ( a ) FERC Form No. 121;
( b ) All well completion reports.
( c ) A radioactivity, electric or other log which will define the coal seams.
( d ) Evidence to establish that the natural gas was produced from a coal seam;
( e ) A statement by the applicant, under oath, that gas is produced from a coal seam through: ( 1 ) ( i ) A well the surface drilling of which began after December 31, 1979, but before January 1, 1993;
( ii ) A recompletion commenced after January 1, 1993, in a well the surface drilling of which began after December 31, 1979, but before January 1, 1993; or
( iii ) A recompletion that was commenced after December 31, 1979 but before January 1, 1993, where such gas could not have been produced from any completion location in existence in the well bore before January 1, 1980; and
( 2 ) The applicant has no knowledge of any information not described in the application which is inconsistent with his conclusion.
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth Circuit 

No. 20-40007 

Summary Calendar 

Curtis Lee Sheppard, Jr., 

Plaintiff—Appellant, 

versus

Kempt, Assistant Warden; Watson, Law Library Clerk; C. 

Martinez, Step 2 Coordinator; M. Price, Investigator III; V. 

Matlock, Investigator II; S. Smith, Law Library Supervisor, 

Defendants—Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Texas 

USDC No. 6:19-CV-567 

Before Willet, Ho, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Curtis Lee Sheppard, Jr., Texas prisoner # 1656666, moves this court 

for authorization to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) following the district 

court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint pursuant to the three 

*

 Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. 

United States Court of Appeals 

Fifth Circuit 

FILED 

April 2, 2021 

Lyle W. Cayce 

Clerk 

Case: 20-40007 Document: 00515806471 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/02/2021
No. 20-40007 

2 

strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Because he has failed to show that 

he should be allowed to proceed IFP on appeal under § 1915(g), see Banos 

v. O’Guin, 144 F.3d 883, 885 (5th Cir. 1998), Sheppard’s motion for leave to 

proceed IFP is denied. 

The facts surrounding the IFP decision are inextricably intertwined 

with the merits of the appeal. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 & n.24 

(5th Cir. 1997). The appeal presents no nonfrivolous issues and is dismissed 

as frivolous. 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 

MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED. 

Case: 20-40007 Document: 00515806471 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/02/2021
# C_2013009EN.01001301.xml

| 12.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 9/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/13

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 November 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof — Germany) — Finanzamt Steglitz v Ines Zimmermann

(Case C-174/11) (1)

1

(Sixth VAT Directive - Exemptions - Article 13A(1)(g) and (2) - Services closely linked to welfare and social security work supplied by bodies governed by public law or organisations recognised as charitable - Recognition - Conditions not applicable to organisations other than bodies governed by public law - Discretion of the Member States - Limits - Principle of fiscal neutrality)

2013/C 9/18

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Finanzamt Steglitz

Applicant:

Defendant: Ines Zimmermann

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Bundesfinanzhof — Interpretation of Article 13A(1)(g) and (2)(a) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1) — Exemption of services linked to welfare and social security work that are supplied by bodies governed by public law or by other organisations recognised as charitable — National legislation making the exemption of out-patient care services subject to certain conditions which are not applicable, however, if the services in question are supplied by certain associations approved by the State, or by members of those associations

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Under Article 13A(1)(g) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, interpreted in the light of the principle of fiscal neutrality, the VAT exemption for out-patient services supplied by commercial service-providers may not be made subject to a condition such as that at issue in the main proceedings, by virtue of which the costs relating to those services must, during the preceding calendar year, have been borne wholly or partly by the statutory social security or social welfare authorities in at least two thirds of cases, where that condition is not capable of ensuring equal treatment in relation to the recognition, for the purposes of that provision, of the ‘charitable’ nature of organisations other than bodies governed by public law.

---

(1)  OJ C 226, 30.7.2011.

1

---
# C_2013344EN.01001701.xml

| 23.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 344/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 344/17

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 26 September 2013 — Polyelectrolyte Producers Group, SNF SAS v European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), European Commission, Kingdom of the Netherlands

(Case C-626/11 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) - Registration, evaluation and authorisation of chemical substances - Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH Regulation) - Articles 57 and 59 - Substances subject to authorisation - Identification of acrylamide as a substance of very high concern - Inclusion on the candidate list of substances - Publication of the list on the ECHA website - Action for annulment brought prior to that publication - Admissibility)

2013/C 344/27

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellants: Polyelectrolyte Producers Group, SNF SAS (represented by: R. Cana and K. Van Maldegem, avocats)

Appellants:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (represented by: M. Heikkilä and W. Broere, Agents, assisted by J. Stuyck, advocaat), Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: C. Wissels and B. Koopman, Agents), European Commission (represented by: P. Oliver and E. Manhaeve, Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, extended composition) of 21 September 2011 in Case T-1/10 Polyelectrolyte Producers Group and SNF v ECHA dismissing as inadmissible an action for the annulment of the decision of the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) of 7 December 2009, identifying acrylamide (EC No 201-173-7) as a substance fulfilling the criteria referred to in Article 57 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006, concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC (OJ 2006 L 396, p. 1), pursuant to Article 59 of that regulation — Act subject to review

Polyelectrolyte Producers Group and SNF

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the order of the General Court of the European Union of 21 September 2011 in Case T-1/10 PPG and SNF v ECHA; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the order of the General Court of the European Union of 21 September 2011 in Case T-1/10 PPG and SNF v ECHA;

| 2. | Refers the present case back to the General Court of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Refers the present case back to the General Court of the European Union;

| 3. | Reserves the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Reserves the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 39, 11.2.2012.

1

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 (the “Form 10-K”) of Middleburg Financial Corporation (the “Company”), I, Joseph L. Boling, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

(a)          the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(b)          the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company and its subsidiaries as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-K.

 

 
| Date:  March 16, 2009 | /s/ Joseph L. Boling                       |
|-----------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                  | Joseph L. Boling                                                                                                                                         |  
Chairman of the Board and

 Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

  |
---

CERTIFICATION OF
  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 
  PURSUANT TO 
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Alain Kardos, Chief Executive Officer of Image Innovations
  Holdings Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
  to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Amendment No. 2 to
  Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Image Innovations Holdings Inc., for the
  quarterly period ending September 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements
  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
  information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents
  in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
  Image Innovations Holdings Inc.

| | By:    | /s/
      Alain Kardos 
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        |                        
| | Name:  | Alain Kardos           
| |        |                        
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer
| |        |                        
| | Date:  | February 19, 2004      

---
Order filed September 30 , 2021

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 21

- 00542

- CV

IN RE RENEE SIZEMORE , R elator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 505th District Court Fort Bend County , Texas T r ial Court Cause No. 19

- DCV

- 259360



### O R DER
Relator ’s appendix to the petition for writ of habeas corpus contains unredacted
sensitive information of relator’s minor children. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.9(a)(3). Parties are required to redact all sensitive information in documents filed in this co u rt unless the
inclusion of the sensitive d ata is specifically required by a statute, court rule, or administrative regulation. Id

. 9.9(b). There is no statute, court rule, or administrative regulation requiring the inclusion of sensitive data applicable to this ori ginal proceeding

. Therefore, we order relator to redact all sensiti ve information from the documents included with her appendix to the petition and refile them in this court on or before
October 8 , 2021

.2 Additionally, r elator must file w ith the petition a sufficient record to establ ish the right to relief. Walker v. Packer , 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Rule 52.7(a)(2) requires the relator to file with the petition “a properly authenticated transcript of any releva nt test imony from any underlying proceeding, i ncluding any

e xhibits offered into evidence, or a statement that no testimony was adduced in connection with the matter complained.” Tex. R. App. P. 52(a)(2).

T he trial court ’ s order indicate s that before hold ing rel ator in contempt, on April 23, June 29, July 30, August 19, August 23, and September 27, 2021, the trial court heard
Movant ’s Amended Motion for Enforcement of Possession or Access. The trial court's contempt order states “[t]he record of testimony was du ly reported by the court reporter
for t he 505 t h Judicial District Court.” Relator ’ s petition , however, is not accompanied by a reporter ’ s record of the hearing s held in this matter. See Tex. R. App. P. 52(a)(2).
By this order, the Court gives rela tor not ice that the peti tion will be dismissed unless an amended petition is filed that addresses the record issues identified abov e o n or before October 8 , 2021

. PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Hassan and Pois sant.
Exhibit 99.2

Section 906 Certification

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) I have reviewed the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Inland Monthly Income Fund II, L.P. (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;

(2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(3) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inland Monthly Income Fund II, L.P.

 

By: Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation

       General Partner

/S/ Kelly Tucek____________________________________

Name: Kelly Tucek

Title: Assistant Vice President of the General Partner and

         Principal Financial Officer of Inland Monthly Income Fund II, L.P.

Date: March 25, 2003
### §1354. Five-year plan; annual technical services program

The designated agency shall prepare and submit to the Secretary in accordance with such regulations as he may publish—

(a) A five-year plan which may be revised annually and which shall: (1) outline the technological and economic conditions of the State, taking into account its region, business, commerce, and its industrial potential and identify the major regional and industrial problems; (2) identify the general approaches and methods to be used in the solution of these problems and outline the means for measuring the impact of such assistance on the State or regional economy; and (3) explain the methods to be used in administering and coordinating the technical services program.

(b) An annual technical services program which shall (1) identify specific methods, which may include contracts, for accomplishing particular goals and outline the likely impact of these methods in terms of the five-year plan; (2) contain a detailed budget, together with procedures for adequate fiscal control, fund accounting, and auditing, to assure proper disbursement for funds paid to the State under this chapter; and (3) indicate the specific responsibilities assigned to each participating institution in the State.

(Pub. L. 89–182, §4, Sept. 14, 1965, 79 Stat. 680.)
### §713a–5. Exemption of Commodity Credit Corporation and its obligations from taxation

Bonds, notes, debentures, and other similar obligations issued by the Commodity Credit Corporation under the provisions of sections 713a–1 to 713a–5 of this title shall be deemed and held to be instrumentalities of the Government of the United States, and as such they and the income derived therefrom shall be exempt from Federal, State, municipal, and local taxation (except surtaxes, estate, inheritance, and gift taxes). The Commodity Credit Corporation, including its franchise, its capital, reserves, and surplus, and its income shall be exempt from all taxation imposed by the United States, by any Territory, dependency, or possession thereof, or by any State, county, municipality, or local taxing authority; except that any real property of the Commodity Credit Corporation shall be subject to State, Territorial, county, municipal, or local taxation to the same extent according to its value as other real property is taxed.

(Mar. 8, 1938, ch. 44, §5, 52 Stat. 108.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Sections 713a–1 to 713a–5, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act". Section 1 and 2 of that act, set out as sections 713a–1 and 713a–2 of this title, have been repealed and section 3 of that act, set out as section 713a–3 of this title, has been omitted.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Exceptions From Transfer of Functions

For exception of functions of corporations of Department of Agriculture from transfer of functions to Secretary of Agriculture by Reorg. Plan No. 2 of 1953, see Exceptions From Transfer of Functions note set out under section 712a of this title.
Exhibit 21.1

TRIQUINT SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.    SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

|NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                     |                                    | STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF
INCORPORATION
|-------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------
|Sawtek, Inc.                           |                                    | Florida                                     
|                                       | Sawtek International, Inc.         |                                             
|                                       | Sawtek Far East, Inc.              |                                             
|                                       |                                    |                                             
|                                       | Sawtek Sweden AB                   |                                             
|                                       | TriQuint Hungary Holding Ltd.      |                                             
|                                       |                                    |                                             
|                                       |                                    |                                             
|                                       |                                    |                                             
|                                       |                                    |                                             
|                                       |                                    |                                             
|TriQuint Texas General Holding Company |                                    | Delaware                                    
|TriQuint Texas Limited Holding Company |                                    | Delaware                                    
|                                       | TriQuint Semiconductor Texas, LP   |                                             
|TriQuint Optoelectronics, Inc.         |                                    | Delaware                                    
|TriQuint Technology Holding Co.        |                                    | Delaware                                    
|TriQuint International Holding Co.     |                                    | Delaware                                    
|                                       | TriQuint International Holding LLC |                                             
|                                       |                                    |                                             
|TriQuint Korea Ltd.                    |                                    | South Korea                                 
|TriQuint Foreign Sales Corporation     |                                    | Barbados                                    

---

QuickLinks
### §69b. Misbranded fur products

For the purposes of this subchapter, a fur product shall be considered to be misbranded—

(1) if it is falsely or deceptively labeled or otherwise falsely or deceptively identified, or if the label contains any form of misrepresentation or deception, directly or by implication, with respect to such fur product;

(2) if there is not affixed to the fur product a label showing in words and figures plainly legible—

(A) the name or names (as set forth in the Fur Products Name Guide) of the animal or animals that produced the fur, and such qualifying statement as may be required pursuant to section 69e(c) of this title;

(B) that the fur product contains or is composed of used fur, when such is the fact;

(C) that the fur product contains or is composed of bleached, dyed, or otherwise artificially colored fur, when such is the fact;

(D) that the fur product is composed in whole or in substantial part of paws, tails, bellies, or waste fur, when such is the fact;

(E) the name, or other identification issued and registered by the Commission, of one or more of the persons who manufacture such fur product for introduction into commerce, introduce it into commerce, sell it in commerce, advertise or offer it for sale in commerce, or transport or distribute it in commerce;

(F) the name of the country of origin of any imported furs used in the fur product;

(3) if the label required by paragraph (2)(A) of this section sets forth the name or names of any animal or animals other than the name or names provided for in such paragraph.

(Aug. 8, 1951, ch. 298, §4, 65 Stat. 177.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of Federal Trade Commission, with certain exceptions, to Chairman of such Commission, see Reorg. Plan No. 8 of 1950, §1, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3175, 64 Stat. 1264, set out under section 41 of this title.