alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.1


                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of FTS Apparel, Inc.
(the  "Company")  on  Form  10-QSB  for the period ending March 31, 2003, as
filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  the undersigned, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of  the  Company,  certifies,  pursuant  to  18  U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 3(a) or 15(d) of
     the  Securities  and  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                         /s/ Scott Gallagher
                         ______________________________________
                         By: Scott Gallagher
                         Chief Executive Officer
                         May 18, 2003


                         /s/ Linda Ehlen
                         ______________________________________
                         By: Linda EHlen
                         Chief Financial Officer
                         May 18, 2003






<PAGE>
#### § 351.13 Inspectors to have access to certified plants at all times.

For the purpose of administering the regulations in this part, inspectors shall have access at all times by day or night to every part of a certified plant.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           54730
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     7424
<ALLOWANCES>                                       307
<INVENTORY>                                       5192
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 70663
<PP&E>                                            6928
<DEPRECIATION>                                    2655
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  103380
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            12991
<BONDS>                                           2554
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           169
<OTHER-SE>                                       86843
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    103380
<SALES>                                          25032
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 25032
<CGS>                                             6743
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     6743
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    18
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (405)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 144
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   3638
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1419
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               2219
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2219
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the second
quarter 10-QSB for the fiscal year ending August 31, 2000 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-29-2000
<CASH>                                         996,885
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  712,182
<ALLOWANCES>                                   181,197
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,107,639
<PP&E>                                       2,771,540
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,584,333
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,148,866
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          569,632
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       674,331
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,637,832
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,148,866
<SALES>                                      1,821,957
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              1821,957
<CGS>                                          915,868
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  915,868
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,087,164
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             (255,946)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,838
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (167,920)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,482
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (175,402)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (175,402)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)


</TABLE>
Commercial/Industrial Pumps ASRAC Working Group: Public Meeting and Webinar 03/27/2014 07:35AM EDT

First Name Last Name Email Address City Industry StateOrganization Zip Code Prem Vuppuluri 902 Battelle BlvdRichland Energy, Chemical, Utilities WAPacific Northwest National Laboratory 99354

Al Iseppon 293 Wright StreetDelavan Manufacturing WI 53115 Rodney Mrkvicka 14040 Santa Fe Trail Drive Lenexa Manufacturing KS Smith & Loveless Inc. 66215 Mark Menzer 11112 Chessington Pl Reston VA 20194 Jeffrey Alascio 16250 Glendale DrNew Berlin Manufacturing WI ABB, Inc 53151 Erica Johnson 902 Battelle BlvdRichland WA 99354 Callie Reis 77 South Bedford Street Burlington MA navigant 01803 Jiangang Hu 6400 W. Enterprise Dr. Mequon Manufacturing WI 53092 Louis Verstegen 6400 West Enterprise Dr Mequon Manufacturing WI 53092
§ 81.4 Issuance of certificates. ( a ) *Information required on certificates.* A certificate must show any official animal identification numbers of each animal to be moved. A certificate must also show the number of animals covered by the certificate; the purpose for which the animals are to be moved; the points of origin and destination; the consignor; and the consignee. The certificate must include a statement by the issuing accredited veterinarian, State veterinarian, or Federal veterinarian that the animals were not exhibiting clinical signs associated with CWD at the time of examination. The certificate must also include a statement that the animals are from a herd that has achieved Certified status in the CWD Herd Certification Program, and must provide the herd's program status, with the following exceptions: ( 1 ) Certificates issued for animals captured from a wild population for interstate movement and release do not need to state that the animals are from a herd that has achieved Certified status in the CWD Herd Certification Program but must include the statement required in § 81.3(b); and
( 2 ) Certificates issued for animals moved directly to slaughter do not need to state that the animals are from a herd that has achieved Certified status in the CWD Herd Certification Program and must state that an APHIS employee or State representative has been notified in advance of the date the animals are being moved to slaughter.
( b ) *Animal identification documents attached to certificates.* As an alternative to typing or writing individual animal identification on a certificate, another document may be used to provide this information, but only under the following conditions: ( 1 ) The document must be a State form or APHIS form that requires individual identification of animals;
( 2 ) A legible copy of the document must be stapled to the original and each copy of the certificate;
( 3 ) Each copy of the document must identify each animal to be moved with the certificate, but any information pertaining to other animals, and any unused space on the document for recording animal identification, must be crossed out in ink; and
( 4 ) The following information must be typed or written in ink in the identification column on the original and each copy of the certificate and must be circled or boxed, also in ink, so that no additional information can be added: ( i ) The name of the document; and
( ii ) Either the serial number on the document or, if the document is not imprinted with a serial number, both the name of the person who issued the document and the date the document was issued.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0237)
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 24, 2022.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, May 24, 2022

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A22I0189. FIRST ACCEPTANCE INSURANCE COMPANY OF GEORGIA, INC. v. 

BRIAN NUNAN et al. .

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

SUV2021000378
Exhibit 23.1

 

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.33-77300, 33-80155; Nos. 333-53181, 333-63345, and 333-94555 on Form S-8, andNos. 33-96766, 333-46574, 333-46578, and 333-53720 on Form S-3 of SangStatMedical Corporation of our report dated February 13, 2001 (March 13, 2001 as toNote 15), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of SangStat MedicalCorporation for the year ended December 31, 2000.

 

 

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

San Jose, CaliforniaMarch 29, 2001

----
### MEMORANDUM

TO: Record

FROM: Lisa Biddle, U.S. EPA

DATE: March 31 , 2015

SUBJECT: Information from EPA Region 3 about T reatment F acilities in Pennsylvania

(DCN SGE 01003 )

I n March 2014 , EPA Office of Water (EPA OW) communicated with EPA Region 3 regarding the status of oil and gas extraction wastewater that may be treated at centralized waste treatment (CWT) facilities and publicly owned treatment works (POTWs) in Pennsylvania. This memorandum contains a summary of that information.

Eureka CWT EPA Region 3 confirmed that the Eureka CWT was still discharging to the Williamsport POTW

, including treated wastewater from hydraulic fracturing operations . Eureka was also planning a second oil and gas treatment facility in the Williamsport area that wou ld also discharge to one of the Williamsport municipal treatment plants. For Williamsport the Region 3 local limits database

showed the last evaluation as 2006

, which likely did not include oil and gas pollutants. Based on

a more recent discussions with th e POTW

, it was EPA Region 3’s understanding that the POTW

wa s applying PADEP’s new source standards ( e.g., 500 milligrams per liter total dissolved

solids ) at the that time (March 2014).

Advanced Waste Services CWT EPA Region 3 explained that their understanding was that Advanced Waste Services was not currently accepting oil and gas wastewater, but since New Castle (the POTW that Advanced

Waste Services discharge s to) was pursuing local limits for oil and gas pollutants, it was likely

that New Cast le would like to authorize the discharge at some point. The 2012 annual pretreatment report showed New Cast le as not currently accepting oil and gas wastewater. Region 3 also pointed out that that New Castle had made a local limits submission that included a literature search for levels of total dissolved solids and chlorides that inhibit activate sludge

treatment systems. EPA Region 3 reviewed and commented on the submission.

Dan

- Pun CWT EPA Region 3 identified Dan

- Pun, which is a CWT that treats oil and gas wastewater that discharges to the Punxsutawney POTW

. However Dan

- Pun was not accepting wastes from unconventional oil and gas extraction operations , but did accept conventional oil and gas wastes.
Additional i nformati on about the treatment at Dan

- Pun was not available. Punxsutawney also

submitted a local limits evaluation in 2008 and their recent permit included a requirement to redo the limit analysis (due 6/12/14).Memorandum

March 31, 2015 Page 2

Ridgeway POTW EPA Region 3’s summary of annual report data for 2012 showed Ridgway POTW as accepting oil and gas extraction waste. Based on the Region 3 local limits database, Ridgway submitted a

reevaluation in Jan uary 2014

.
§ 157.22 Schedule for final decisions on a request for a Federal authorization. ( a ) For an application under section 3 or 7 of the Natural Gas Act that requires a Federal authorization—*i.e.,* a permit, special use authorization, certification, opinion, or other approval—from a Federal agency or officer, or State agency or officer acting pursuant to delegated Federal authority, a final decision on a request for a Federal authorization is due no later than 90 days after the Commission issues its final environmental document, unless a schedule is otherwise established by Federal law.
( b ) For requests for a water quality certification submitted pursuant to section 401(a)(1) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act) in connection with a project for which authorization is sought from the Commission under section 3 or 7 of the Natural Gas Act, the reasonable period of time during which the certifying agency may act on the water quality certification request is one year from the certifying agency's receipt of the request. A certifying agency is deemed to have waived the certification requirements of section 401(a)(1) of the Clean Water Act if the certifying agency has not denied or granted certification by one year after the date the certifying agency received a written request for certification.
[86 FR 16302, Mar. 29, 2021]
### §433. Remedies of cooperative association excluded from representation

Any such cooperative association or any such organization whose duly authorized representative is excluded from such membership and privileges by any board of trade referred to in section 432 of this title may sue in the United States District Court in whose jurisdiction such board of trade is operated or maintained for a mandatory injunction compelling such board of trade to admit such duly authorized representative to such membership and privileges and for any damages sustained, and such court shall have jurisdiction to issue such an injunction and to award such incidental damages as it may deem appropriate.

(Mar. 4, 1927, ch. 508, §3, 44 Stat. 1424.)
### §1211. Prohibition against transportation of refrigerators without safety devices

It shall be unlawful for any person to introduce or deliver for introduction into interstate commerce any household refrigerator manufactured on or after the date this section takes effect unless it is equipped with a device, enabling the door thereof to be opened from the inside, which conforms with standards prescribed pursuant to section 1213 of this title.

(Aug. 2, 1956, ch. 890, §1, 70 Stat. 953.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

For date this section takes effect, referred to in text, see Effective Date note below.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Act Aug. 2, 1956, ch. 890, §5, 70 Stat. 953, provided that: "This Act [this chapter] shall take effect on the date of its enactment [Aug. 2, 1956], except that the first section of this Act [this section] shall take effect one year and 90 days after the date of publication of commercial standards first established under section 3 of this Act [section 1213 of this title]. In the event of a change in said commercial standards first established, a like period shall be allowed for compliance with said change in commercial standards."

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions of Secretary of Commerce and Federal Trade Commission under this chapter transferred to Consumer Product Safety Commission, see section 2079 of this title.
# C_2011013EN.01003101.xml

| 15.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/31

---

Action brought on 4 November 2010 — Pharmazeutische Fabrik Evers v OHIM — Ozone Laboratories Pharma (HYPOCHOL)

(Case T-517/10)

()

2011/C 13/60

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Pharmazeutische Fabrik Evers GmbH & Co. KG (Pinneberg, Germany) (represented by: R. Kaase and R. Möller, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Ozone Laboratories Pharma SA (București, Romania)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 1st September 2010 in case R 1332/2009-4; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 1st September 2010 in case R 1332/2009-4; and

st

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘HYPOCHOL’, for goods in class 5 — Community trade mark application No 5718069

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited: German trade mark registration No 1171145 of the figurative mark ‘HITRECHOL’, for goods in class 5

Mark or sign cited:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal wrongly assumed that there was no likelihood of confusion between the trade marks due to a lacking similarity between the signs.

Pleas in law:

---
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

Safer Medical of Montana and

George Ackerson Complainants,



### v. City ofFort Benton, Montana and Chouteau County, Montana Joint Airport Board, Respondents. ) ) 

### ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FAA Docket No. 16-15-12

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME
This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the above referenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules ofPractice for Federally-Assisted Airport Enforcement Proceedings, 

### 14 Code ofFederal Regulations (CFR) Part 

### 16.
Additional time is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete consideration ofthe matters before the agency. Accordingly, pursuant to 

### 14 CFR Part 

### 16, subpart B, the date by which the Director's Detennination will be issued in this matter is hereby extended to February 9, 2017.


# f;)-0--d,o/(o Date

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
HEREBY CERTIFY that on December 9, 2016, I caused to be placed in the United States mail (first class, postage paid) or personally delivered a true copy ofthe foregoing Order addressed to:

Counsel for Complainants
Adrian A. Miller Holland & Hart LLP 401 North 31st Street Suite 1500 P.O. Box 639 Billings, MT 59103-0639 aamiller@hollandhart.com
FOR RESPONDENTS City of Fort Benton
Brian Lilletvedt Bosch, Kuhr, Dugdale, Martin, and Kaze, LLP 335 Fourth Avenue P.O. Box 7152 Havre. MT 59501 blilletvedt@bkdlaw.org Chouteau County Mitchell A. Young Montana Association ofCounties Defense Services Mitchell A. Young 2717 Skyway Drive, Suite F Helena, MT 59602 myoung@mtcounties.org

Hand-Delivered to: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket (AGC-600) FAA Office ofAirport Compliance and Management Analysis (AC0

- 1 00) 

### FAAANMRegion

# e~
Claudia Roberts Office ofAirport Compliance

and Management Analysis 2
Appellant’s Motion Granted; Appellee’s Motion Denied as Moot; Appeal 

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 15, 2016.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-16-00300-CV

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF VICTOR E. UWA AND 

IDONGESIT PAMELA UDOH-UWA

On Appeal from the 309th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2014-48637

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed March 8, 2016. On October 12, 

2016, appellee filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. On 

October 24, 2016, appellant filed a motion to withdraw his notice of appeal. See 

Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. Appellant’s motion is granted. Appellee’s motion is denied 

as moot.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices McCally and Brown.
#### § 93.419 [Reserved]
# C_2012133EN.01002601.xml

| 5.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 133/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 133/26

---

Order of the General Court of 21 March 2012 — Ebro Foods v Commission

(Case T-234/10) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - State aid - Aid scheme allowing the tax amortisation of financial goodwill for foreign shareholding acquisitions - Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market and not ordering the recovery of the aid - No individual concern - Inadmissibility)

2012/C 133/50

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Ebro Foods, SA, formerly Ebro Puleva, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J. Buendía Sierra, E. Abad Valdenebro, M. Munõz de Juan and R. Calvo Salinero, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal and C. Urraca Caviedes, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Article 1(1) of Commission Decision 2011/5/EC of 28 October 2009 on the tax amortisation of financial goodwill for foreign shareholding acquisitions C 45/07 (ex NN 51/07, ex CP 9/07) implemented by Spain (OJ 2011 L 7, p. 48)

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Ebro Foods, SA shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Ebro Foods, SA shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 195, 17.7.2010.

1

---