alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 13.2**

**STATEMENT OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIALOFFICER OF**

**ARCADIS N.V.**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

In connection with the annual report of ARCADIS N.V.(the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31,2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I,Ben A. van der Klift, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that, based on my knowledge:

(1)           The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: June 22, 2006 | By:    | /s/ Ben A. van der Klift      |
|--------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
|                     |   | Ben A. van der Klift          |
|                     |   | Chief Financial Officer       |
|                     |   | (Principal Financial Officer) |

 

----
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 2043** 

JOSEPH SCHAFER; MAUREEN SCHAFER , Plaintiffs

– Appellants ,
v. CITIBANK, N.A., as trustee for Bear Stearns ALT

- A Trust 2006

- 5; BEAR STEARNS ALT

- A TRUST 2006

- 5, A New York common law trust; JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., f/k/a EMC Mortgage Corporation, as successor in interest to EMC Mortgage, LLC; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED, a Delaware Corporation; COMMONWEALTH TRUSTEES, LLC , Defendants

– Appellees, and FIRST GUARANTY MORTGAGE CORPORATION, a Virginia Corporation; DAVID A. NEAL, a Virginia Resident, Original Trustee , Defendants.

-------------------------------------- VIRGINIA POVERTY LAW CENTER; NATIONAL CONSUMER LAW CENTER; NAT IONAL ASSOCIATION OF CONSUMER ADVOCATES; HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES MADE EQUAL; VIRGINIA INTERFAITH CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY , Amici Supporting Appellants
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. Gerald Bruce Lee , District Judge. ( 1:10

- cv - 00010

- GBL

- TCB )2 Submitted : September 19, 2011 Decided: September 2 8 , 2011

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Christopher E. Brown, R. Mi chael Smith, BROWN, BROWN & BROWN, P.C., Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellants. Eric N. Heyer, THOMPSON & HINE LLP, Washington, D.C.; Mark D. Meyer, ROSENBERG & ASSOCIATES, LLC, Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellees. Thomas D. Domonoske, LEGAL AID JUSTICE CEN TER, Harrisonburg, Virginia; Brenda Castaneda, LEGAL AID JUSTICE CENTER, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Amici Supporting Appellants
. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: Joseph and Maureen Schafer appeal the di strict court’s order granting Defendants’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motions to dismiss Plaintiffs’ state law claims for declaratory judgment , breach of fiduciary duty, and quiet title, as well as their claim under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1692

- 1692p (West 2009 & Supp. 2011)
. Potential amici curiae have filed a motion to file an amici curiae brief, along with an amici curiae brief, and a motion to certify a question to the Supreme Court of Virginia. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant the motion to file the amici curiae brief, we deny the motion to certify a question to the Supreme Court of Virginia and affirm the district court’s order. See Schafer v. Citibank, N.A. , No. 1: 10

- cv - 00010

- GBL

- TCB (E.D. Va. Aug. 3, 2010); see also Horvath v. Bank of N.Y. , N.A. , 641 F.3d 617 (4th Cir. 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argume nt would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 590.900 Definitions; requirements for importation into the United States. ( a ) When used in this subpart, the following terms will be construed to mean: ( 1 ) *Import (Imported).* To bring within the territorial limits of the United States, whether that arrival is accomplished by land, air, or water.
( 2 ) *Offer(ed) for entry.* The point at which the importer presents the imported product for reinspection.
( 3 ) *Entry (entered)* means the point at which imported product offered for entry receives reinspection and is marked with the official mark of inspection, as required by § 590.940.
( 4 ) *Official Import Inspection Establishment.* This term means any establishment, other than an official establishment as defined in § 301.2 of this chapter, where inspections are authorized to be conducted as prescribed in § 590.925.
( b ) No egg products may be imported into the United States unless they are healthful, wholesome, fit for human food, not adulterated, and contain no dye, chemical, preservative, or ingredient which renders them unhealthful, unwholesome, unadulterated, or unfit for human food. Such products must also comply with the regulations prescribed in this subpart to ensure that they adhere to the standards provided for in the Act. The provisions of this subpart will apply to these products only if they are capable for use as human food.
( c ) Approval for Federal import inspection must be in accordance with §§ 590.140 through 590.149.
( d ) Egg products may be imported only if they are processed solely in the countries listed in § 590.910(b).
#### Exchange Security Bank, Plaintiff-Appellant, *v.*Roy O’Gwin, Defendant-Appellee.

(No. 73-203;

Second District (2nd Division)

January 21, 1975.

Donovan, DichtI, Atten, Mountcastle & Roberts, of Wheaton, for appellant.

No brief for appellee.

Opinion by

Mr. JUSTICE T. MORAN.
Exhibit 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements, as
amended, of Financial Security Assurance Holdings Ltd. on Form S-8 (File No.
33-78784) (1993 Equity Participation Plan), Form S-8 (File No. 33-92648)
(Deferred Compensation Plan), Form S-3 (File No. 33-80769) (in connection with
USW DECS and Forward Shares), Form S-3 (File No. 333-34181) (Debt Securities and
Common Stock), and Form S-3 (File No. 333-74165) (Debt Securities, Common Stock,
Stock Purchase Contracts, Stock Purchase Units and Preferred Stock), of:

1. Our report dated January 26, 1999, except for the restatements and
reclassifications section in Note 2 as to which the date is August 4, 1999, on
our audits of the consolidated balance sheets of Financial Security Assurance
Holdings Ltd. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the related
consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders' equity and cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1998, and
financial statement schedule which appear in Financial Security Assurance
Holdings Ltd.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1998, which report is included in Item 8 of this Annual
Report, as amended.

2. Our report dated January 26, 1999 on our audits of the consolidated balance
sheets of Financial Security Assurance Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31,
1998 and 1997, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in
shareholder's equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 1998, which report is included in exhibit 99 to this Annual
Report on Form 10-K, as amended.


/s/  PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
-------------------------------
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

August 5, 1999
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 172 (Wednesday, September 5, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54646-54647]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-21884]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8013]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Becoming Van Gogh''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000

[[Page 54647]]

(and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 
2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the 
exhibition ``Becoming Van Gogh,'' imported from abroad for temporary 
exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The 
objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign 
owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display 
of the exhibit objects at the Denver Art Museum, Denver, Colorado, from 
on or about October 21, 2012, until on or about January 20, 2013, and 
at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is 
in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: August 28, 2012.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-21884 Filed 9-4-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 97-2150EM NO. 98-1007EM

_____________ Charles R. Buchek, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Missouri. * Monsanto Company, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

_____________ Submitted: August 7, 1998

Filed: August 14, 1998

_____________ Before FAGG, BEAM, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. Charles R. Buchek appeals the district court's adverse grant of summary judgment in Buchek 's employment discrimination action and the district court's award of cos ts to Monsanto Company. After careful review of the record and the parties ' briefs, we conclude the dist rict court correctly granted judgment in favor of Monsanto Co mpany. We also conclude the district court's decision to award costs was not a n abuse of discretion. See Bathke v. Casey's Gen. Stores, Inc. , 64 F.3d 340, 347 (8t h Cir. 1995) (s tandard of review). We deny the parties' motions on appeal. We thu s affirm the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.-2-

A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 69 (Monday, April 11, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20070-20071]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8534]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Commercial Space Transportation Safety Approval Performance 
Criteria

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notification of criteria used to evaluate the National 
Aerospace Training and Research (NASTAR) Center safety approval 
application.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NASTAR was issued a safety approval, subject to the provisions 
of Title 51 U.S.C. subtitle V, chapter 509, and the orders, rules and 
regulations issued under it. Pursuant to 14 CFR 414.35, this Notice 
publishes the criteria that were used to evaluate the safety approval 
application.
    Background: NASTAR applied for, and received, a safety approval for 
the ability of its Space Training System: Model 400 (STS-400) to 
replicate G levels. The performance criteria for this safety approval 
are applicant developed per 14 CFR 414.19 (a)(4). NASTAR's

[[Page 20071]]

STS-400 suborbital space flight simulator (a multi-axis centrifuge) is 
capable of replicating the G forces associated with suborbital space 
flight within the following parameters:
    --Manned flight profiles up to 12 Gz and 8 Gx, with an onset rate 
up to +/- 8 G/Sec and an accuracy in Gz and Gx axis of +/- 0.1 G.
    Criteria Used to Evaluate Safety Approval Application: The STS-400 
was evaluated by the FAA as a component of a flight crew training 
process. The evaluation included the FAA's assessment of the STS-400's 
ability to accurately replicate the specified G levels.
    NASTAR submitted the following data to show that the STS-400 
complies with the criteria:
    --Acceptance Test Plan.
    --Launch and reentry profiles demonstrations, and
    --G level accelerometer and tachometer test results.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  For questions about the performance 
criteria, you may contact Sherman Council, Licensing and Evaluation 
Division (AST-200), FAA Office of Commercial Space Transportation 
(AST), 800 Independence Avenue SW., Room 331, Washington, DC 20591, 
telephone (202) 267-8308; e-mail sherman.council@faa.gov.

    Issued in Washington, DC, April 4, 2011.
George C. Nield,
Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation.
[FR Doc. 2011-8534 Filed 4-8-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          29,720
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,324
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         683,515
<DEPRECIATION>                                  41,707
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 689,714
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         58
<COMMON>                                           169
<OTHER-SE>                                     396,308
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   689,714
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               109,475
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   47,560
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,573
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,188
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,188
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,848)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,182
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .90
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .90
        

</TABLE>
### §§617 to 619. Repealed or Omitted

Section 617, act Jan. 22, 1932, ch. 8, §17, 47 Stat. 12, was omitted by act June 30, 1947, ch. 166, title I, §1, 61 Stat. 202, which generally amended the Reconstruction Finance Corporation Act, act Jan. 22, 1932, ch. 8, 47 Stat. 5.

Section 618, act June 30, 1947, ch. 166, title II, §208, 61 Stat. 209, related to purchase and sale of surplus property, and was repealed by act of May 25, 1948, ch. 334, §7, 62 Stat. 265.

Section 619, act July 29, 1947, ch. 346, title II, §201, 61 Stat. 515, related to limitations on use of funds of the Corporation, which Corporation was abolished by section 6 of Reorg. Plan No. 1 of 1957, eff. June 30, 1957, 22 FR 4633, 71 Stat. 647. Reorg. Plan No. 1 of 1957 is set out preceding section 601 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0001063530
<NAME>                        Surgical Safety Products, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  22,793
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    6,337
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               29,130
<PP&E>                                         176,995
<DEPRECIATION>                                 29,905
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 390,113
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       10,787
<OTHER-SE>                                     108,427
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   390,113
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               39,577
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  147,433
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,521
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (107,856)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
### §689j. Reporting requirement

Each New Markets Venture Capital company that participates in the program established under this part shall provide to the Administrator such information as the Administrator may require, including—

(1) information related to the measurement criteria that the company proposed in its program application; and

(2) in each case in which the company under this part makes an investment in, or a loan or grant to, a business that is not located in a low-income geographic area, a report on the number and percentage of employees of the business who reside in such areas.

(Pub. L. 85–699, title III, §361, as added Pub. L. 106–554, §1(a)(8) [§1(b)(3)], Dec. 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A–661.)
§ 500.7 Refusal to grant inspection. ( a ) The FSIS Administrator may refuse to grant Federal inspection because an applicant: ( 1 ) Does not have a HACCP plan as required by part 417 of this chapter;
( 2 ) Does not have Sanitation Standard Operating Procedures as required by part 416 of this chapter;
( 3 ) Has not demonstrated that adequate sanitary conditions exist in the establishment as required by part 308, subpart H of part 381, part 416, or part 590 of this chapter;
( 4 ) Has not demonstrated that livestock will be handled and slaughtered humanely; or
( 5 ) Is unfit to engage in any business requiring inspection as specified in section 401 of the FMIA, section 18(a) of the PPIA, or section 18 of the EPIA.
( b ) If the Administrator refuses to grant inspection, the applicant will be provided the opportunity for a hearing in accordance with the Uniform Rules of Practice, 7 CFR Subtitle A, part 1, subpart H.
[64 FR 66546, Nov. 29, 1999, as amended at 85 FR 68673, Oct. 29, 2020; 85 FR 81340, Dec. 16, 2020]
#### § 93.312 Manure from quarantined horses.

No manure shall be removed from the quarantine premises until the release of the horses producing same.
#### § 94.3 Organs, glands, extracts, or secretions of ruminants or swine.

The importation of fresh (chilled or frozen) organs, glands, extracts, or secretions derived from ruminants or swine, originating in any region where foot-and-mouth disease exists, as designated in § 94.1, except for pharmaceutical or biological purposes under conditions prescribed by the Administrator in each instance, is prohibited.

[28 FR 5980, June 13, 1963, as amended at 53 FR 48520, Dec. 1, 1988; 62 FR 56022, Oct. 28, 1997; 63 FR 67574, Dec. 8, 1998; 83 FR 15493, Apr. 11, 2018]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAR-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           3,010
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,512
<ALLOWANCES>                                    17,726
<INVENTORY>                                      2,010
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,375
<PP&E>                                          84,827
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,070
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 248,265
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          44,948
<BONDS>                                        1,276
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       404
<OTHER-SE>                                     201,637
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   248,265
<SALES>                                        118,400
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               118,400
<CGS>                                          117,400
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  117,400
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               15,254
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (32,633)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (11,421)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (21,212)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,737)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.15)
        


</TABLE>