alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §§637, 638. Repealed. Aug. 6, 1953, ch. 335, §19, 67 Stat. 400

Section 637, acts May 12, 1933, ch. 25, title II, §39, 48 Stat. 50; June 16, 1933, ch. 98, title VIII, §80(a), 48 Stat. 273, related to certain functions, powers, authority, and duties of Land Bank Commissioner.

Section 638, act June 16, 1933, ch. 98, title VIII, §80, 48 Stat. 273, changed name of office of Farm Loan Commissioner to Land Bank Commissioner, contained provisions relating to his term of office, and contained provisions relating to appointment (within the Farm Credit Administration), compensation, expenses and duties of a Production Credit Commissioner, a Cooperative Bank Commissioner, and an Intermediate Credit Commissioner.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective 120 days after Aug. 6, 1953, see act Aug. 6, 1953, ch. 335, §18, 67 Stat. 399.
#### § 2.1b Availability in contested cases of information acquired by staff investigation.

Pursuant to the Commission's authority under the Natural Gas Act, particularly subsection (b) of section 8 thereof, and under the Federal Power Act, particularly subsection (b) of section 301 thereof, upon request by a party to the proceedings, or as required in conjunction with the presentation of a Commission staff case of staff's cross-examination of any other presentation therein, all relevant information acquired by Commission staff, including workpapers pursuant to any staff investigation conducted under sections 8, 10, or 14 of the Natural Gas Act, and sections 301, 304 or 307 of the Federal Power Act, shall, without further order of the Commission, be free from the restraints of said subsection (b) of section 8 of the Natural Gas Act, and subsection (b) of section 301 of the Federal Power Act, regarding the divulgence of information, with respect to any matter hereafter set for formal hearing.

[58 FR 38292, July 16, 1993]
### §636c. Age of applicant for disaster loans

In the administration of any Federal disaster loan program under the authority of section 636a 1 of this title, section 4452 1 of title 42, or section 233 of Public Law 91–606, the age of any adult loan applicant shall not be considered in determining whether such loan should be made or the amount of such loan.

(Pub. L. 91–606, title II, §235, Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1754.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 636a of this title, referred to in text, was repealed by Pub. L. 97–35, title XIX, §1917, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 781.

Section 4452 of title 42, referred to in text, was repealed by Pub. L. 93–24, §7, Apr. 20, 1973, 87 Stat. 25.

Section 233 of Public Law 91–606, referred to in text, amended section 1820(a)(2), (f) [now 3720(a)(2), (f)] of Title 38, Veterans' Benefits.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Disaster Relief Act of 1970, and not as part of the Small Business Act which comprises this chapter. Section was formerly classified to section 4454 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Dec. 31, 1970, see section 304 of Pub. L. 91–606, set out as an Effective Date of 1970 Amendment note under section 165 of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.

1 See References in Text note below.
### §3615. Nonexclusion of other statutory rights and remedies

The rights and remedies provided by this chapter shall be in addition to any and all other rights and remedies that may exist under Federal or State law.

(Pub. L. 96–399, title VI, §616, Oct. 8, 1980, 94 Stat. 1680.)
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.30


Summary of Compensation Arrangements for Certain Named Executive Officers 


Set forth below is a summary of the compensation paid by SunEdison Semiconductor Limited (the “Company”) to the executive officers who are named in the Company's  Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the “Form 10-K”). Neither of the below executive officers has an employment agreement with the Company. Each of these executive officers is an employee at will whose compensation and employment status may be changed at any time in the discretion of the Company's Board of Directors.
Base Salaries. These executive officers currently receive base salaries in the amounts indicated below: 	
				
	Name and Position
	2015 Base Salary Amount

	Jeffrey Hall, Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
	$
	400,000
	


	John Kauffmann, Senior Vice President Global Sales
	$
	310,000
	





The Compensation Committee reviews these base salaries annually and adjusts them as they deem appropriate. The Committee reviews and discusses the performance of each executive officer with the Chief Executive Officer. 
Incentive Awards. These executive officers are also eligible to participate in the Company's incentive compensation plans as provided in the terms of such plans, including the Company's short term incentive awards plan (which provides for cash incentive awards) and the Company's long-term incentive awards plan (e.g., the Company's 2014 Equity Incentive Plan). Such plans, and any forms of awards thereunder providing for material terms, are included as exhibits to the Form 10-K as appropriate.
### **CHAPTER 51—NATIONAL PRODUCTIVITY AND QUALITY OF WORKING LIFE**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—FINDINGS, PURPOSE, AND POLICY; DEFINITIONS

Sec.
2401.
Congressional findings.
2402.
Congressional statement of purpose.
2403.
Congressional declaration of policy.
2404.
Definitions.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—NATIONAL CENTER FOR PRODUCTIVITY AND QUALITY OF WORKING LIFE

2411.
Establishment.
2412.
Board of Directors.
2413.
Executive Director and Deputy Director.
2414.
Functions of the Center.
2415.
Powers of the Center.
2416.
Contracts and other funding arrangements.
2417.
Criteria for participating parties.
2418.
Annual report.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—FEDERAL AGENCY COORDINATION AND LIAISON WITH CENTER

2431.
Liaison with Center.
2432.
Internal review.
2433.
Support of external activities.
2434.
Internal productivity.
2435.
Other statutory obligations

#### SUBCHAPTER IV—ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS

2451.
Authority of Executive Director.

#### SUBCHAPTER V—EVALUATION BY COMPTROLLER GENERAL

2461.
Audit, review, and evaluation.

#### SUBCHAPTER VI—AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS

2471.
Authorization of appropriations.
§ 312.2 Official marks and devices to identify inspected and passed products of cattle, sheep, swine, or goats. ( a ) The official inspection legend required by part 316 of this subchapter to be applied to inspected and passed carcasses and parts of carcasses of cattle, sheep, swine and goats, meat food products in animal casings, and other products as approved by the Administrator, shall be in the appropriate form as hereinafter specified:[1] For application to sheep carcasses, the loins and ribs of pork, beef tails, and the smaller varieties of sausage and meat food products in animal casings. For application to calf and goat carcasses and on the larger varieties of sausage and meat food products in animal casings. For application to beef and hog carcasses primal parts and cuts therefrom, beef livers, beef tongues, beef hearts, and smoked meats not in casings. For application to burlap, muslin, cheesecloth, heavy paper, or other acceptable material that encloses carcasses or parts of carcasses.
( b ) ( 1 ) The official inspection legend required by part 317 of this subchapter to be shown on all labels for inspected and passed products of cattle, sheep, swine, and goats shall be in the following form1 except that it need not be of the size illustrated, provided that it is a sufficient size and of such color as to be conspicuously displayed and readily legible and the same proportions of letter size and boldness are maintained as illustrated:
( 2 ) This official mark shall be applied by mechanical means and shall not be applied by a hand stamp.
( 3 ) The official inspection legend described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section may also be used for purposes of part 316 of this subchapter on shipping containers, band labels, artificial casings, and other articles with the approval of the Administrator.
( c ) Any brand, stamp, label, or other device approved by the Administrator and bearing any official mark prescribed in paragraphs (a) or (b) of this section shall be an official device for purposes of the Act.
[35 FR 15573, Oct. 3, 1970; 36 FR 12002, June 24, 1971] Footnotes -
312.2
[1] The number “38” is given as an example only. The establishment number of the official establishment where the product is prepared shall be used in lieu thereof.
#### § 156.10 Hearings.

The Commission will schedule each application for public hearing at the earliest possible date giving due consideration of statutory requirements and other matters pending, with notice thereof as provided by § 385.2009 of this chapter: *Provided, however,* That where no protests or petitions to intervene have been received and accepted, the Commission may, after the due date for such protests or petitions to intervene, issue the requested order without hearing.

[Order 234, 26 FR 4848, June 1, 1961, as amended by Order 225, 47 FR 19057, May 3, 1982]
##### 



EXHIBIT 21 SUBSIDIARIES NAP of the Americas, West Inc., a Florida corporation
Park West Telecommunications Investors, Inc., a Florida corporation
TECOTA Services Corp., a Delaware corporation
Terremark Trademark Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation
TerreNAP Data Centers, Inc., a Florida corporation
TerreNAP Services, Inc., a Florida corporation
Optical Communications, Inc., a Florida corporation TECOTA Services Corp. owns a 100% interest in:  TerreNAP Data Centers, Inc., is the sole shareholder of: 
 TerreNAP Services, Inc. is the sole shareholder of: 
 Technology Center of the Americas, Inc. owns a minority interest in: 
 Terremark Latin America, Inc. is the sole shareholder of:  Terremark Latin America, Inc. owns 99% of: 
 Terremark Latin America, Inc. is a minority shareholder of:  Terremark Latin America (Brasil) Ltda, a Brazil corporation, is a majority
shareholder of:  Terremark Worldwide, Inc. owns a minority shareholder interest in:
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 May 15, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Rocco B. CommissoRocco B. CommissoChairman and
Chief Executive OfficerBy:
    /s/ Mark E. StephanMark E. StephanExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of WNC Housing Tax Credit
Fund IV, L.P., Series 1 (the "Partnership") for the year ended March 31, 2003 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  and  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.,  section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  I,  Wilfred N.  Cooper,  Jr.,
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner
of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Partnership.


/s/WILFRED N. COOPER, JR.
-------------------------
Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
June 24, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0001063530
<NAME>                        Surgical Safety Products, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Currency

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         12,970
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  16,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    5,901
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               36,121
<PP&E>                                         201,151
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 423,105
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          50,000
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       11,799
<OTHER-SE>                                     241,726
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   423,105
<SALES>                                        720
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               165,221
<CGS>                                          14,271
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  666,868
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               642,842
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             9,755
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (501,647)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (501,647)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (0.045)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION BY CFO PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of Information Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Vincent A. Chippari,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Vincent A. Chippari                              |   |
|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                 |   |
| Vincent A. Chippari                                  |   |
| Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
| November 14, 2002                                    |   |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

          - 49 CFR Parts 385, 390, and 395
          - [Docket No. FMCSA-2010-0167]
          - RIN 2126-AB20

# AGENCY: 

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM); extension of comment period.

# SUMMARY:

This notice extends the public comment period for the NPRM from April 4, 2011 to May 23, 2011.

# DATES:

Comments on the NPRM are due by May 23, 2011.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Deborah M. Freund, Vehicle and Roadside Operations Division, Office of Bus and Truck Standards and Operations, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001 or by telephone at (202) 366-5370.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

On February 17, 2011, the Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance requested that FMCSA extend the comment period for the Electronic On-Board Recorder and Hours of Service Supporting Documents Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, which published on February 1, 2011 (76 FR 5537), by 45 days. On March 1, 2011, the American Trucking Associations also requested a 45-day extension to the comment period.

FMCSA believes that other potential commenters to this rulemaking will benefit from an extension as well. Accordingly, FMCSA extends the comment period for all comments on the NPRM and its related documents to May 23, 2011.

Issued on: March 4, 2011.

Anne S. Ferro,

Administrator.

[FR Doc. 2011-5421 Filed 3-9-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P
### TO: Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

FROM: Ryan Novak , ERG

DATE: September 30

, 2015

SUBJECT: Index for Supporting Documentation for the Black Creek, MS Case Study

Model (DCN SE05590 )

This document serves as the index for the supporting documentation for the Black Creek, MS Case Study Model, developed as part of the Environmental Assessment for the Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Source Category (EA Report), Document No. EPA

- 821

- R

- 15

- 006 (DCN SE04527) . The supporting documentation for this case study includes the files listed in Table 1.

Table 1. Supporting Documentation for the Black Creek, MS Case Study Model

Attachment ID Document Name Brief Description

A1 Attachment 1: Pollutant

Loadings and Design Workbook

- SE05590A1 Documentation of the modeling scope, design, steam electric power plant loadings, STORET monitoring data, and DMR/TRI point source loadings evaluated for the Black Creek, MS case study model. Refer to the ‘ReadMe’ tab of the workbook for additional information about the contents of each tab.

A2 Attachment 2: WASP

Model Input and Output Files

- SE05590A2 These files represent the WASP model input and output file s for the Black Creek, MS case study model. The WASP input file (.wif) for each pollutant and scenario represent s the settings and inputs used to execute case study modeling. The output data represent the daily water column and sediment concentrations in each segment of the WASP model, for each pollutant, for baseline and each regulatory option.

A3 Attachment 3 : Water

Quality Benchmark Exceedance Analysis

- SE05590A 3 T he water quality analysis for the Black Creek, MS case study model. These results were generated by running a script on the raw WASP model output (see Attachment 2) . The output from this script ind icates the percent of daily average concentrations that each segment exceeded the water quality benchmarks and CSCL sediment benchmarks evaluated in the EA.

A4 Attachment 4 : Wildlife

and Human Health Im pacts Analysis

- SE05590A4 T he wildlife and human hea lth analysis for the Black Creek, MS case study model. This workbook includes the annual average water column concentration output

, generated by the WASP model , that

were evaluated against the threshold concentrations determined to trigger wildlife or human health benchmark exceedances.
### FOR PUBLICATION 

### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT



#  F LAVIO N UNEZ -R EYES , aka Flavio Reyes , No. 05-74350 Petitioner, Agency No. v. 

#  A078-181-648 E RIC H. H OLDERJr., Attorney ORDER General , Respondent. 

# 

Filed September 24, 2010

ORDER KOZINSKI, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

16705
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Raymond J. Sims, *et al.,*Defendants-Appellants.

(Nos. 53372, 53373 cons.;

First District

September 9, 1971.

Gerald W. Getty, Public Defender, of Chicago, (James J. Doherty, of counsel,) for appellants.

Edward V. Hanrahan, State’s Attorney, of Chicago, (Elmer C. Kissane and James Veldman, of counsel,) for the People.

Mr. JUSTICE DEMPSEY

delivered the opinion of the court:

After a trial without a jury, Raymond Sims and WiUiam Crenshaw, both seventeen years of age, were found guüty of murder and sentenced to a term of twenty to thirty years in the penitentiary. They request a reduction in their sentences.

*491In the late afternoon of January *4,*1968, Sims, Grenshaw and two sixteen-year-old friends met in a restaurant on Roosevelt Road, Chicago. While there, Sims said he needed some money and felt like snatching a purse. When they left the restaurant Sims again said that he needed money and asked the others if they wanted to help. Grenshaw agreed; the younger boys did not.

As they sauntered along the street, Mrs. Laura Giles, a seventy-two-year-old woman who was returning home from work, got off a Roosevelt Road bus and walked passed them. As she turned into her home, Sims ran up to her on one side and Grenshaw on the other and they tried to seize her purse. She resisted and Sims stabbed her in the back with a knife. Sims and Grenshaw ran away. Mrs. Giles entered her home and her son called an ambulance, but she died on the way to the hospital.

The defendants point to their youth, their lack of criminal record and their home environment in requesting a reduction of the punishment set by the trial court.

In *People v. Valentine*(1965), 60 Ill.App.2d 339, 208 N.E.2d 595, this court, in reviewing a sentence of life imprisonment imposed on a seventeen-year-old who was convicted of rape, said: We believe that the power to reduce sentences should be used with caution and that a sentence imposed by the trial judge, who sees the defendant and is in a far better position to appraise him and to evaluate the likelihood of his rehabilitation than a reviewing court, should not be reduced unless there are substantial reasons for doing so.”

The defendants murdered a defenseless woman. The crime was senseless and wanton. The sentences of twenty to thirty years were within the scope of the punishment fixed by statute (Ill. Rev. Stat., 1967, ch. 38, par. 9—1 (b)) and were not incommensurate with the enormity of the offense.

The judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

McNAMARA, P. J., and McGLOON, J., concur.