alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 93.217 Import permit and declaration for poultry. ( a ) For poultry intended for importation from regions of Central America or of the West Indies, the importer shall first apply for and obtain from APHIS an import permit as provided in § 93.204: *Provided,* That the Administrator, when he or she finds that such action may be taken without endangering the livestock or poultry industry of the United States, may, upon request by any person, authorize the importation by such person, without such application or permit, from the British Virgin Islands into the Virgin Islands of the United States, of poultry consigned for immediate slaughter, and such authorization may be limited to a particular shipment or extend to all shipments under this paragraph by such person during a specified period of time.
( b ) For all poultry offered for importation from regions of Central America or of the West Indies, the importer or his or her agent shall present two copies of a declaration as provided in § 93.206.
( c ) All poultry offered for importation from regions of Central America and the West Indies shall also meet the additional requirements in §§ 93.205, 93.207, 93.209, and 93.210 to qualify for entry. All poultry which fail to meet these requirements shall be rejected entry and shall be disposed of as directed by the Administrator in accordance with applicable laws.
[55 FR 31495, Aug. 2, 1990. Redesignated and amended at 62 FR 56012, 56015, Oct. 28, 1997]
§ 158.601 Compensation strategy. To ensure the DHS-CS fulfills its purpose, as stated in § 158.202, the Secretary or designee aims to establish and administer a compensation system, described in § 158.602, that: ( a ) Ensures the compensation for DHS-CS employees is sufficiently competitive to recruit and retain individuals possessing CTMS qualifications;
( b ) Values, encourages, and recognizes, in alignment with the DHS-CS core values described in § 158.305: ( 1 ) Exceptional CTMS qualifications and mission impact,
( 2 ) Excellence and innovation in the performance of DHS-CS cybersecurity work, and
( 3 ) Continual learning to adapt to evolving cybersecurity risks and cybersecurity threats; and
( c ) Acknowledges the unpredictable nature of cybersecurity work and the expectation that DHS-CS employees occasionally work unusual hours and extended hours, as needed, to execute the DHS cybersecurity mission, especially in response to exigent circumstances and emergencies, including cybersecurity incidents; and
( d ) Reflects an understanding of the cybersecurity talent market, including: ( 1 ) Leading compensation practices and trends,
( 2 ) Current cybersecurity work expectations and arrangements, and
( 3 ) An understanding of the concepts of total compensation and total rewards.
**Exhibit32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1250,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with thequarterly report of Power3 Medical Products, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John P. Burton,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of myknowledge,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

The Report fully compileswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  May 15, 2006 | /s/ John P. Burton             |   |
|--------------------------|--------------------------------|--------|
|                     | John P. Burton                 |
|                     | Chief Financial Officer        |
|                     | Power3 Medical  Products, Inc. |

 

1

----
### §25. Restraining violations; procedure

The several district courts of the United States are invested with jurisdiction to prevent and restrain violations of this Act, and it shall be the duty of the several United States attorneys, in their respective districts, under the direction of the Attorney General, to institute proceedings in equity to prevent and restrain such violations. Such proceedings may be by way of petition setting forth the case and praying that such violation shall be enjoined or otherwise prohibited. When the parties complained of shall have been duly notified of such petition, the court shall proceed, as soon as may be, to the hearing and determination of the case; and pending such petition, and before final decree, the court may at any time make such temporary restraining order or prohibition as shall be deemed just in the premises. Whenever it shall appear to the court before which any such proceeding may be pending that the ends of justice require that other parties should be brought before the court, the court may cause them to be summoned whether they reside in the district in which the court is held or not, and subpoenas to that end may be served in any district by the marshal thereof.

(Oct. 15, 1914, ch. 323, §15, 38 Stat. 736; June 25, 1948, ch. 646, §1, 62 Stat. 909.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is act Oct. 15, 1914, ch. 323, 38 Stat. 730, which is classified generally to sections 12, 13, 14 to 19, 20, 21, and 22 to 27 of this title, and sections 52 and 53 of Title 29, Labor. For further details and complete classification of this Act to the Code, see References in Text note set out under section 12 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Act June 25, 1948, eff. Sept. 1, 1948, substituted "United States attorneys" for "district attorneys of the United States". See section 541 et seq. of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
#### PACIFIC THRIFT & LOAN COMPANY, a Guam Corporation, Plaintiff v. SUBURBAN INVESTORS, INC., et al., Defendants

Civil No. 145-76

Superior Court of Guam

September 29, 1976

BENSON, *Judge*

MEMORANDUM DECISION

This matter came before the court on the motion of Suburban Investors, Inc., for a temporary restraining order.

The motion should be granted provided Suburban Investors, Inc. provides security to pay damages suffered by plaintiff should it develop that plaintiff has been wrongfully restrained. Such damages consist of interest accruing $533.00 per day. Security must cover a 30 day period. If it is shown that mortgagee receives rents covering all or part of this amount the security may be eliminated or decreased accordingly. (Rules 65(c) and 65.1),

Hearing on the preliminary injunction shall be held at 10:00 o’clock a.m., Friday, October 8,1976.

Suburban Investors, Inc. must submit proposed temporary restraining order with the security to the court in sufficient time prior to the sale scheduled for 10:00 a.m., tomorrow.
# C_2010260EN.01001601.xml

| 25.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/16

---

Action brought on 6 July 2010 — Seven Towns Ltd v OHIM

(Case T-293/10)

()

2010/C 260/22

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Seven Towns Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: E. Schäfer, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Partially annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 29 April 2010 in case R 1475/2009-1, as far as Community trade mark application No 5650817 was rejected; |
| --- | --- |

—

Partially annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 29 April 2010 in case R 1475/2009-1, as far as Community trade mark application No 5650817 was rejected;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings including applicant’s costs of legal representation. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings including applicant’s costs of legal representation.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: A colour per se mark described as ‘six surfaces being geometrically arranged in three pairs of parallel surfaces, with each pair being arranged perpendicularly to the other two pairs characterised by (i) any two adjacent surfaces having different colours and (ii) each surface having a grid structure formed by black borders dividing the surface into nine equal segments’. The indicated colours were red (PMS 200C); green (PMS 347C); blue (PMS 293C); orange (PMS 021C); yellow (PMS 012C); white and black for goods in class 28 — Community trade mark application No 5650817

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the examiner: Refused the application for a Community trade mark

Decision of the examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulled the contested decision and rejected Community trade mark application No 5650817

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: The applicant advances two pleas in law in support of its application.

Pleas in law:

On the basis of its first plea, the applicant claims that the contested decision violates the principles of due process by infringing Articles 80(1) and 80(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 in conjunction with Rule 53(a) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2868/95, as the Board of Appeal erroneously examined the substantive issue.

By its second plea, the applicant considers that the contested decision violates its right of fair proceedings by infringing Article 64(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal based its decision on a completely new argument without the Applicant having been invited to submit its observations.

---
#### Manufacturers’ Supply Co., Inc. *vs.*Adolph W. Alsfeld.

NOVEMBER 12, 1952.

Present: Flynn, C. J., Capotosto, Baker, Condon and O’Connell, JJ.

Condon, J.

This is an action on book account based on a promissory note. The case was tried on defendant’s pleas of the general issue and the statute of limitations before a justice of the superior court, sitting without a jury, who rendered a decision for the defendant. It is here on plaintiff’s exception to that decision.

The trial justice based his decision chiefly on the ground that defendant had proved his plea of the statute of limitations. He also found that plaintiff, who claimed that defendant had revived the note by a new promise, had failed to prove such promise. On the contrary he expressly rejected the testimony of plaintiff’s witnesses on that issue and accepted the testimony of defendant. If that conclu*117sion is supported by the evidence it becomes unnecessary to pass upon the other contentions as to points of law.

*Aram K. Berberian,*for plaintiff.

*William B. Sweeney,*for defendant.

Under his exception plaintiff now contends that such decision is contrary to law and against the evidence and the weight thereof. It appears from the evidence that the note was made on January 25, 1929; that shortly thereafter two payments of $25 each were made on the principal; that there were no further payments thereon; and that no interest was paid. However, two witnesses testified for the plaintiff that on November 20, 1950 defendant had stated to them that he would pay the note after “Christmas time.” The defendant positively denied that he had ever made such a statement and he further testified that he never promised to pay the note after it had become barred by the statute.

From our examination of the transcript we are of the opinion that the evidence presented a pure question of fact determinable almost entirely upon the credibility of the witnesses on the issue whether defendant had made a new valid promise which revived the note notwithstanding the bar of the statute. In reaching his decision the trial justice first passed upon the credibility of the witnesses. After expressly stating that he accepted the testimony of the defendant he rendered a decision in his favor. We have found nothing in the transcript which would justify us in setting aside the decision. In such circumstances we cannot say that it is clearly wrong or that it is otherwise erroneous as a matter of law.

The plaintiff’s exception is overruled, and the case is remitted to the superior court for entry of judgment on the decision.
Order entered February 20, 2015.

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01383-CV

ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS, L.P. AND ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS 

OPERATING LLC, Appellants/Cross-appellees

V.

ENERGY TRANSFER PARTNERS, L.P. AND ENERGY TRANSFER FUEL, L.P.,

Appellees/Cross-appellants

On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 11-12667

ORDER

Before the Court is appellants’ February 17, 2015, second unopposed motion for 

extension of time to file their brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellants file their 

brief no later than March 30, 2015. 

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
#### § 559.3 Criminal offenses.

The criminal provisions of the Act apply with respect to the inspection of fish and fish products as they do with respect to the inspection of other food products subject to the Act.
#### § 286.104 Response to notification.

Upon issuance of a Commission order that notes a finding or findings, with or without proposed remedies, with which the audited person has disagreed, the audited person may: Acquiesce in the findings and proposed remedies by not timely responding to the Commission order, in which case the Commission may issue an order approving them or taking other action; or challenge the finding or findings and any proposed remedies with which it disagreed by timely notifying the Commission in writing that it requests Commission review by means of a shortened procedure, or, if there are material facts in dispute which require cross-examination, a trial-type hearing.
### §4909. Exclusion of information

The Data Bank shall not include any information—

(1) the disclosure of which to the public is prohibited under any other provision of law or otherwise authorized to be withheld under other provision of law; or

(2) that is specifically authorized under criteria established by statute or an Executive order not to be disclosed in the interest of national defense or foreign policy and are in fact properly classified pursuant to such Executive order.

(Pub. L. 100–418, title V, §5409, Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1467.)
### §§2012, 2013. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–272, §7(b), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1379

Section 2012, Pub. L. 92–513, title V, §512, as added Pub. L. 94–163, title III, §301, Dec. 22, 1975, 89 Stat. 916; amended Pub. L. 96–425, §4(a)(2), Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1823, related to reports to be submitted by Secretary to President and Congress regarding fuel flow instrument reading directly in miles per gallon, exemption from this subchapter for electric cars, and examination, by Secretary and Secretary of Labor, on exemption under section 2003(b) of this title. See section 32916 of Title 49, Transportation.

Section 2013, Pub. L. 92–513, title V, §513, as added Pub. L. 100–494, §6(a), Oct. 14, 1988, 102 Stat. 2448; amended Pub. L. 102–486, title IV, §403(5), Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2876, related to incentives for manufacturing alternative-fuel automobiles. See sections 32901, 32902, 32905, and 32906 of Title 49.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the first
quarter 10-QSB for the fiscal year ending August 31, 1998 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    NOV-30-1997
<CASH>                              509,861
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                     1,309,213        
<ALLOWANCES>                        114,280
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  2,987,105
<PP&E>                            2,948,749
<DEPRECIATION>                    1,247,354
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    5,441,762
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             1,104,691
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                            671,552
<OTHER-SE>                        3,267,765
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      5,441,762
<SALES>                           2,054,144
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  2,054,144
<CGS>                               706,178
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       706,178
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  1,100,415
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     10,967
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   10,217
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     236,520
<INCOME-TAX>                         44,869
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 191,651
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                        191,651
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                          0.01
        

</TABLE>
§ 154.108 Composition of rate schedules. The rate schedule must contain a statement of the rate or charge and all terms and conditions governing its application, arranged as follows: ( a ) *Title.* Each rate schedule must have a title consisting of a designation of the type or classification of service (see § 154.103(b)), and a statement of the type or classification of service to which the rate is applicable.
( b ) *Availability.* This paragraph must describe the conditions under which the rate is offered, including any geographic zone limitations.
( c ) *Applicability and character of service.* This paragraph must fully describe the kind or classification of service to be rendered.
( d ) *Summary of rates.* This paragraph must briefly set forth all components of the rates, refer to the location of the rates in the Currently Effective Rates, and provide a description of the calculation of the monthly charges for each rate component.
( e ) *Other provisions.* All other major provisions governing the application of the rate schedule, such as determination of billing demand, contract demand, heat content, and measurement base, must be set forth with appropriate headings or incorporated by reference to the applicable general terms and conditions.
( f ) *Applicable terms and conditions.* This paragraph either states that all of the general terms and conditions set forth in the tariff apply to the rate schedule, or specifies which of the general terms and conditions do not apply.
T14N

R07W

T14N

R08W

T14N

R09W

T14N

R10W

T15N

R07W

T15N

R08W

T15N

T15N R09W

R10W

MT200

MT200 Lincoln

607-D2

Road 7

4106-002

4043-G2

4106-L1

U-432

607-C2

U-442

Road 6

PVT-1227

Road

8

1837-B5

PVT-1228

1824-G1

U-112

1824

U-430

1837-B4

Road

5

1824-B2

U-115

U-436

U-433

607-F1

4106-001

607-C1

626-D1

4106-K1

U-113

1800

Road 9

1824-A1

4043-B1

1804-A1

1824-H1

626-C2

1804

607-G1

U-434

1824-E1

4106-D1

1824-I1

4601-B1

1837-A1

1837-B2

607

U-431

U-117

1824-F1

626-A1

Road 6

Road

3

1800-C1

4106-002

4043-F1

4043-E1

607-E1

607-D1

1837-B3

4043-G1

626-B1

4043-C1

4043

4106

4106-C1

4106-A1

607-F2

4043-D1

1824-B1

607-A1

607-H1

1804-B1

1824-C1

1837

626

1837-B1

1824-D1

59

60

61

63

64

65

66

67

68

69

70

71

72

74

1

3

4

5

6 7

8

9

10

11

12

15

19 21

23 22

24

27

29

31

30

33

34

36

37 38

40 41

49

50

52

54

56

57

51

81

84 85

86

80

87

16

17 18

25

32

53

44

45

58

13

28

73

78

14

55

82

79

35

26

2

83

76

77

88

62

39

42

43

20

75

46

47

48

Legend

Stonewall Project Boundary

Helena NF Boundary

Other Ownership

INFISH Buffer

Inventoried Roadless Areas (IRAs)

Stonewall PA Treatments

Drescription Groups

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Broadcast Burn

Jackpot Burn

Site Prep Burn

Underburn

Prescribed Fire

No Treatment

Handpiling, Burn Piles

Underburn or Slash Treatment along PVT

Slashing, Handpiling, Burn Piles

Construct/Obliterate

Not Haul Route

Reconstruction

0 1 2

Miles

Stonewall Vegetation Project Area

Alternative 2- Proposed Action .

Disclaimer:

The Forest Service uses the most current and complete data available. GIS data and product accuracy may vary.

They may be: developed from sources of differing accuracy, accurate only at certain scales, based on modeling or

interpretation, incomplete while being created or revised, etc. Using GIS products for purposes other than those

for which they were created may yield inaccurate or misleading results. The Forest Service reserves the right to

correct, update, modify or replace GIS products without notification. For more information contact:

Helena National Forest

2880 Skyway Drive

Helena, Montana 59602

406-449-5201

lcb 042513

Proposed stream channel crossing

Road 4

Lincoln Gulch IRA

Bear-Marshall-Scapegoat-Swan IRA
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           3,680
<SECURITIES>                                   139,134
<RECEIVABLES>                                   80,321
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,034
<INVENTORY>                                        771
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               249,276
<PP&E>                                         452,934
<DEPRECIATION>                                  29,895
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 676,174
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          144,964
<BONDS>                                        348,218
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           387
<OTHER-SE>                                     177,351
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   676,174
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               113,936
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   79,220
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,715
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,616
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (24,755)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (9,118)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (15,637)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,637)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.47)


</TABLE>