alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 724 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to establish additional registration 

requirements for prescribers of opioids, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 7, 2019 

Mrs. GILLIBRAND (for herself and Mr. GARDNER) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to establish additional registration requirements for prescribers of 

opioids, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘John S. McCain Opioid 

5 Addiction Prevention Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS FOR PRESCRIBERS. 

7 Section 303 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 

8 U.S.C. 823) is amended by adding at the end the fol9 lowing: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 724 IS

1 ‘‘(l)(1) Creating obligations for practitioners, only as 

2 described herein, the Attorney General shall not register, 

3 or renew the registration of, a practitioner under sub4 section (f) who is licensed under State law to prescribe 

5 controlled substances in schedule II, III, or IV, unless the 

6 practitioner submits to the Attorney General, for each 

7 such registration or renewal request, a certification that 

8 the practitioner, during the applicable registration period, 

9 will not prescribe any schedule II, III, or IV opioid, other 

10 than an opioid prescription described in paragraph (3), for 

11 the initial treatment of acute pain in an amount in excess 

12 of the lesser of— 

13 ‘‘(A) a 7-day supply (for which no refill is avail14 able); or 

15 ‘‘(B) an opioid prescription limit established 

16 under State law. 

17 ‘‘(2) In this subsection, the term ‘acute pain’— 

18 ‘‘(A) means pain with abrupt onset and caused 

19 by an injury or other process that is not ongoing; 

20 and 

21 ‘‘(B) does not include— 

22 ‘‘(i) chronic pain; 

23 ‘‘(ii) pain being treated as part of cancer 

24 care; 

25 ‘‘(iii) hospice or other end-of-life care; or 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•S 724 IS

1 ‘‘(iv) pain being treated as part of pallia2 tive care. 

3 ‘‘(3) An opioid prescription described in this para4 graph is a prescription— 

5 ‘‘(A) for a schedule II, III, or IV opioid drug 

6 approved by the Food and Drug Administration for 

7 an indication for the treatment of addiction; and 

8 ‘‘(B) that is for the treatment of addiction.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
#### § 5.4 Pay administration.

The provisions of chapter 55 of title 5, U.S. Code and the Office of Personnel Management implementing regulations apply to Government Accountability Office employees.
#### In the Matter of the Petition for Registration of Titles of Certain Pieces of Land Designated as Lot No. 3270-1 and Lot No. 3270-5, and Lot No. 3270-1 New, Located at Ordot, Municipality of Sinajana, Territory of Guam, Marianas Island, DELORES PANGELINAN GERBER, Appellee VICENTE G. REYES, Appellant In the Matter of the Petition for Registration of Titles of Certain Pieces of Land Designated as Lot No. 3270-2 and Lot No. 3270-3, Located at Ordot, Municipality of Sinajana, Territory of Guam, Marianas Island, JULIANA PANGELINAN ROSE, Appellee VICENTE G. REYES, Appellant

Civil No. 18-A

Civil No. 19-A

District Court of Guam Appellate Division

March 7, 1962

*62
      *Counsel for Appellees:*Joaquin C. Arriola

*Counsel for Appellant:*Finton J. Phelan, Jr.

Before GILMARTIN (deceased), *Presiding Judge;*FURBER, *Chief Justice,*High Court of the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands and DUEÑAS, *Judge,*Island Court of Guam

PER CURIAM

OPINION

The above-entitled actions were combined for trial in the Island Court of Guam and were consolidated on appeal. After oral argument on appeal the late Eugene R. Gilmartin died, and the remaining judges constitute a quorum. These were petitions for the registration of land under the Land Title Registration Act of Guam. The Court below heard extensive testimony and made an on-the-site investigation. Based upon the testimony, exhibits and on-the-site investigation, the Court entered its decree of registration. The appellant in what was labeled a motion in the nature of a writ of error coram nobis moved to vacate each decree upon the ground that the Court was without authority to accept an abstract prepared by officials of the government of Guam and that the abstract recited but one instrument, a decree of distribution in Probate Estate No. 345-45. The Court very properly denied this motion, and the appellant appealed.

We have examined the extensive record in these cases and we find no merit in any of the appellant’s contentions on appeal. Except for the question of the abstract and its contents, all other questions involve those which properly *63should have been raised in the lower Court. As regards the abstract, the sole contention is that it was prepared by employees of the government of Guam and that it shows nothing except an order of distribution of an estate. It was certainly* not the responsibility of the Court below to make independent inquiry as to the circumstances under which an abstract was prepared, nor was any showing made that there were additional entries which should have appeared upon the abstract.

Other assignments of error on appeal relate to the method of conducting the Court, interpreting the testimony of witnesses and the preparation of the transcript by a court reporter who, it is alleged, does not understand the local dialect. The appellant was not represented by counsel, but the Court made every effort to see that he was familiar with the proceedings at all stages. Witnesses were presented by him. We find no evidence that he did not receive due process or that the decree of registration was not proper. We therefore affirm.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-40285

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

TREVOR HENDERSON,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:10-CR-1-8

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Trevor Henderson received a 51-month prison term following his guilty

plea to one count of possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute. 

He challenges the district court’s calculation of the sentencing guidelines range

under U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1, asserting that the court reversibly erred by including

in the drug quantity the 56.7 grams of methamphetamine he promised to obtain

for undercover officers but did not deliver. Inclusion of that amount increased

his offense level from 12 to 26. 

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 30, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-40285 Document: 00511710410 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/30/2011
No. 11-40285

According to Henderson, he did not intend or have the capability to deliver

the drugs but instead intended to rob the buyers of the purchase price. The

district court erroneously ruled that his intent and/or capability were irrelevant

once he arrived for a face-to-face meeting with the buyers. See § 2D1.1, cmt.

(n.12); United States v. Davis, 478 F.3d 266, 268-70 (5th Cir. 2007). The

Government fails to show that the significant procedural error was harmless. 

See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007); United States v.

Delgado-Martinez, 564 F.3d 750, 753 (5th Cir. 2009). Accordingly, we vacate

Henderson’s sentence and remand for resentencing. See Delgado-Martinez, 564

F.3d at 752-53. 

Henderson also asserts that the district court reversibly erred by

classifying as relevant conduct his possession of .18 grams of methamphetamine

for personal use while on pre-trial release. He correctly concedes, however, that

the alleged error will not affect his guidelines range. Thus, it is not a

“significant procedural error.” See Gall, 552 U.S. at 597 (defining “significant

procedural error” warranting reversal to include improper calculation of the

guidelines range). 

SENTENCE VACATED AND REMANDED.

2

Case: 11-40285 Document: 00511710410 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/30/2011
### §694. Repealed. Pub. L. 100–590, title I, §111(b), Nov. 3, 1988, 102 Stat. 2995

Section, Pub. L. 85–699, title IV, §403, as added Pub. L. 89–117, title III, §316(a), Aug. 10, 1965, 79 Stat. 484; amended Pub. L. 91–609, title IX, §911(a)(3), Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1812; Pub. L. 93–386, §6(a)(2), Aug. 23, 1974, 88 Stat. 747; Pub. L. 94–305, title I, §103, June 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 665; Pub. L. 95–89, title I, §103, Aug. 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 556, provided for revolving fund for commercial or industrial lease guarantees.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Remaining Lease Guarantee Fund Moneys

Pub. L. 100–590, title I, §111(b), Nov. 3, 1988, 102 Stat. 2995, provided in part that: "Any moneys remaining in the Lease Guarantee Fund on the date of enactment of this Act [Nov. 3, 1988] shall be transferred to the Small Business Administration's business loan and investment fund."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,326,231
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,491,909
<ALLOWANCES>                                   744,000
<INVENTORY>                                 13,039,186
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            28,060,229
<PP&E>                                      30,482,237
<DEPRECIATION>                              16,317,492
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              47,591,853
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,034,988
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        79,037
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,179,315
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                47,591,853
<SALES>                                     23,149,842
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            23,371,616
<CGS>                                       16,272,482
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               21,973,356
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               826,228
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             343,550
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                228,242
<INCOME-TAX>                                   134,579
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             93,903
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    93,903
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02


</TABLE>
-----Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 02/15/2010 09:49PM -----

To: Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA From: "Rentz, Rebecca" <Rebecca.Rentz@bgllp.com> Date: 01/28/2010 05:13PM cc: "Holmstead, Jeff" <Jeff.Holmstead@bgllp.com>, "Wasson, Mike"<Mike.Wasson@Exterran.com>, <JDutton@jwoperating.com>, <David.O'Leary@warrenequipment.com> Subject: Rulemaking EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708 Melanie,

Please find attached SI Management Practice recommendations for your consideration. These recommendations are being submitted on behalf of Exterran, JW Power Company and CSI (EJC) but have also received input and support from others who operate SI RICE potentially impacted by the proposed rule.

Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or need additional information.

Thank you,

Rebecca
Rebecca J Rentz | Counsel | Bracewell & Giuliani LLP 711 Louisiana Street, Suite 2300 | Houston, Texas | 77002-2770 T: 713.221.1176 | F: 713.221.2134 rebecca.rentz@bgllp.com | www.bgllp.com/rentz | www.bgllp.com
### §6751. National Association of Registered Agents and Brokers

#### (a) Establishment

There is established the National Association of Registered Agents and Brokers (referred to in this subchapter as the "Association").

#### (b) Status

The Association shall—

(1) be a nonprofit corporation;

(2) not be an agent or instrumentality of the Federal Government;

(3) be an independent organization that may not be merged with or into any other private or public entity; and

(4) except as otherwise provided in this subchapter, be subject to, and have all the powers conferred upon, a nonprofit corporation by the District of Columbia Nonprofit Corporation Act (D.C. Code, sec. 29–301.01 et seq.) or any successor thereto.

(Pub. L. 106–102, title III, §321, as added Pub. L. 114–1, title II, §202(a), Jan. 12, 2015, 129 Stat. 13.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The District of Columbia Nonprofit Corporation Act, referred to in subsec. (b)(4), is Pub. L. 87–569, Aug. 6, 1962, 76 Stat. 265, which is not classified to the Code.

#### Prior Provisions

Provisions similar to this section were contained in section 6752 of this title, prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 114–1.

A prior section 6751, Pub. L. 106–102, title III, §321, Nov. 12, 1999, 113 Stat. 1422, related to State flexibility in multistate licensing reforms, prior to the general amendment of this subchapter by Pub. L. 114–1.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# AGENCY:

Federal Election Commission.

# DATE AND TIME:

Wednesday, March 16, 2011 at 10 a.m.

# PLACE:

999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

# STATUS:

This meeting will be open to the public.

## Items To Be Discussed

Correction and Approval of the Minutes for the Meeting of March 3, 2011

Draft Advisory Opinion 2011-03: Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, National Republican Congressional Committee, Republican National Committee, Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, and National Republican Senatorial Committee by Marc E. Elias, Esq., Jessica Furst, Esq., John Phillippe, Esq., Brian G. Svoboda, Esq., and Michael E. Toner, Esq.

Proposed Final Audit Report on Hillary Clinton for President (A08-05)

Withdrawal and Resubmission of Proposed Interpretative Rule Regarding Electronic Contributor Redesignations (LRA 820)

Legislative Recommendations

Management and Administrative Matters.

Individuals who plan to attend and require special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact Shawn Woodhead Werth, Commission Secretary and Clerk, at (202) 694-1040, at least 72 hours prior to the hearing date.

# PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: 

Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Shawn Woodhead Werth,

Secretary and Clerk of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2011-5846 Filed 3-9-11; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
Crisis Counseling Assistance and Training Program 

Trainer’s Toolkit

Handout 7 

Organizational Approaches for 

Stress Prevention and Management 
Organizational Approaches for Stress Prevention and Management

Dimension Immediate Response Long-Term Response

Effective 

Management Structure 

and Leadership

– Clear chain of command and 

reporting relationships

– Available and accessible clinical 

supervisor

– Shifts no longer than 12 hours, with 

12 hours off

– Briefings provided at beginning of 

shifts as workers exit and enter the 

operation

– Necessary supplies available (e.g., 

paper, forms, pens, educational 

materials)

– Communication tools available (e.g., 

mobile phones, radios)

– Full-time, disaster-trained 

supervisors and program director 

with demonstrated management and 

supervisory skills

– Clear and functional organizational 

structure

– Program direction and 

accomplishments reviewed and 

modified, as needed

Clear 

Purpose and Goals

– Clearly defined intervention goals 

and strategies appropriate to 

assignment setting (e.g., crisis 

intervention, debriefing)

– Community needs, focus, and scope 

of program defined

– Periodic assessment of 

organizational health and service 

targets and strategies

– Crisis Counseling Assistance and 

Training Program Guidance

integrated into service priorities

– Staff trained and supervised to 

define limits and make referrals

– Staff provided feedback on number 

of contacts, program 

accomplishments, etc.

Functionally 

Defined Roles

– Staff oriented and trained with written 

role descriptions for each assignment 

setting

– If another agency (e.g., Red Cross, 

Federal Emergency Management 

Agency) has authority over the setting, 

staff are informed of their roles, 

contacts, and expectations

– Job descriptions and expectations 

for all positions

– Participating disaster recovery 

agencies’ roles understood, and 

working relationships with key 

agency contacts maintained

Team 

Support

– Buddy system for support and 

monitoring stress reactions

– Positive atmosphere of support and 

tolerance with “good job” said often

– Team approach avoids program 

design with isolated workers from 

separate agencies

– Informal case consultation, problem 

solving, and resource sharing

– Regular, effective meetings with 

productive agendas, personal 

sharing, and creative program 

development

– Clinical consultation and supervision

– In-service training appropriate to 

current recovery issues provided

Adapted from U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2000). Training manual for mental health 

and human service workers in major disasters. (DHHS Publication No. 90–538). Washington, DC: 

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration and Center for Mental Health Services.
§ 385.901 Scope (Rule 901). ( a ) *Proceedings to which applicable.* The provisions of this subpart apply to proceedings of the Commission held in accordance with section 503(c) of the Department of Energy Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 7193(c)) to review orders issued by the Secretary of Energy pursuant to section 503(a) of the Department of Energy Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 7193(c)), and initiated by notices of probable violation, proposed remedial orders, or other formal administrative initiating documents issued on or after October 1, 1977, which are contested by the recipient.
( b ) *Relationship to other rules.* ( 1 ) Where a provision of this subpart is inconsistent with a provision in any other subpart of this part, the provision in this subpart controls.
( 2 ) Subpart F of this part, except Rule 601, does not apply to proceedings under this subpart.
§ 281.210 Conflicting data. ( a ) *Interstate pipelines.* Notwithstanding any other provision of this subpart, if the records of an interstate pipeline contain information which directly conflicts with a request for reclassification of priority 1 entitlements under § 281.206, or classification of priority 2 entitlements under § 281.207, the interstate pipeline may not include such volumes in priority 1 or 2 of its index of entitlements.
( b ) *Local distribution companies.* Notwithstanding the provisions of § 281.207(c), if the records of a local distribution company contain information which directly conflicts with a request from an essential agricultural user to have the local distribution company to seek classification of volumes in priority 2, the local distribution company may not seek classification for such volumes.
[44 FR 26862, May 8, 1979]
### §2223d. Annual revision of recommendations

After the submission of the report cited in section 2223c of this title, the working group established under section 2223b of this title shall meet as needed, but at least once every 12 months, to review and recommend changes and additions to the report cited in section 2223c of this title, that are necessary and appropriate for operational personnel at the local level.

(Pub. L. 101–446, §5, Oct. 22, 1990, 104 Stat. 1046.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Firefighters' Safety Study Act, and not as part of the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act of 1974 which comprises this chapter.
### §6106. Definitions

For purposes of this chapter:

(1) The term "attorney general" means the chief legal officer of a State.

(2) The term "Commission" means the Federal Trade Commission.

(3) The term "State" means any State of the United States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands, and any territory or possession of the United States.

(4) The term "telemarketing" means a plan, program, or campaign which is conducted to induce purchases of goods or services, or a charitable contribution, donation, or gift of money or any other thing of value, by use of one or more telephones and which involves more than one interstate telephone call. The term does not include the solicitation of sales through the mailing of a catalog which—

(A) contains a written description, or illustration of the goods or services offered for sale,

(B) includes the business address of the seller,

(C) includes multiple pages of written material or illustrations, and

(D) has been issued not less frequently than once a year,

where the person making the solicitation does not solicit customers by telephone but only receives calls initiated by customers in response to the catalog and during those calls takes orders only without further solicitation.

(Pub. L. 103–297, §7, Aug. 16, 1994, 108 Stat. 1550; Pub. L. 107–56, title X, §1011(b)(3), Oct. 26, 2001, 115 Stat. 396.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2001—Par. (4). Pub. L. 107–56 inserted ", or a charitable contribution, donation, or gift of money or any other thing of value," after "services" in introductory provisions.