alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 76 

To redesignate the Saint-Gaudens National Historic Site as the ‘‘SaintGaudens National Historical Park’’, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 10, 2019 

Mrs. SHAHEEN (for herself and Ms. HASSAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To redesignate the Saint-Gaudens National Historic Site as 

the ‘‘Saint-Gaudens National Historical Park’’, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Saint-Gaudens Na5 tional Historical Park Redesignation Act’’. 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 76 IS

1 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF SAINT-GAUDENS NATIONAL HIS2 TORICAL PARK. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Saint-Gaudens National His4 toric Site shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Saint5 Gaudens National Historical Park’’. 

6 (b) AMENDMENTS TO PUBLIC LAW 88–543.—Public 

7 Law 88–543 (78 Stat. 749) is amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘National Historic Site’’ each 

9 place it appears and inserting ‘‘National Historical 

10 Park’’; 

11 (2) in section 2(a), by striking ‘‘historic site’’ 

12 and inserting ‘‘Saint-Gaudens National Historical 

13 Park’’; 

14 (3) in section 3, by— 

15 (A) striking ‘‘national historical site’’ and 

16 inserting ‘‘Saint-Gaudens National Historical 

17 Park’’; and 

18 (B) striking ‘‘part of the site’’ and insert19 ing ‘‘part of the park’’; and 

20 (4) in section 4(b), by striking ‘‘traditional to 

21 the site’’ and inserting ‘‘traditional to the park’’. 

22 (c) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any law, regula23 tion, document, record, map, or other paper of the United 

24 States to the Saint-Gaudens National Historic Site shall 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 76 IS

1 be considered to be a reference to the ‘‘Saint-Gaudens Na2 tional Historical Park’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
# C_2010100EN.01005801.xml

| 17.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 100/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 100/58

---

Action brought on 8 February 2010 — Victoria Sánchez v Parliament and Commission

(Case T-61/10)

2010/C 100/86

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Fernando Marcelino Victoria Sánchez (Sevilla, Spain) (represented by: N. Domínguez Varela, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendants: European Parliament and European Commission

Defendants:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | A declaration that the failure of the European Parliament and of the Commission to respond to the application made by way of letters on 6 October 2009 is contrary to European Union law and an order for those institutions to remedy the situation. |
| --- | --- |

—

A declaration that the failure of the European Parliament and of the Commission to respond to the application made by way of letters on 6 October 2009 is contrary to European Union law and an order for those institutions to remedy the situation.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

On 28 August 2008 the applicant submitted a petition to the Committee on Petitions of the Parliament relating to an alleged corruption network in Spain in the field of social security and public health. On 3 May 2009 the President of that committee informed him that no further action would be taken as regards his petition.

On 6 December 2009 the applicant sent a letter to the European Parliament and the European Commission, pursuant to Article 265 TFEU, calling upon them to act. In that letter he requested that:

| — | the European Parliament annul the decision of 3 May 2009 of the President of the Committee on Petitions and investigate the circumstances in which that decision was adopted; |
| --- | --- |

—

the European Parliament annul the decision of 3 May 2009 of the President of the Committee on Petitions and investigate the circumstances in which that decision was adopted;

| — | the European Commission also undertake an investigation into the administration of justice in Spain. |
| --- | --- |

—

the European Commission also undertake an investigation into the administration of justice in Spain.

Since he did not receive a response within the time-limit laid down to that end, the applicant brought this action for failure to act.

In support of his claims, the applicant submits that his fundamental rights have been infringed, namely his right to submit a petition, his right to equality before the law and his right to not be discriminated against. He also submits that the conditions have been met for the defendant institutions to be found to have failed to act.

---
§ 367.2282 Account 228.2, Accumulated provision for injuries and damages. ( a ) This account must be credited with amounts charged to account 925, Injuries and damages (§ 367.9250), or other appropriate accounts, to meet the probable liability, not covered by insurance, for deaths or injuries to employees and others and for damages to property neither owned nor held under lease by the service company.
( b ) When liability for any injury or damage is admitted by the service company, either voluntarily or because of the decision of a court or other lawful authority, such as workmen's compensation board, the admitted liability must be charged to this account and credited to the appropriate current liability account. Details of these charges must be maintained according to the year the casualty occurred which gave rise to the loss.
( c ) Recoveries or reimbursements for losses charged to this account must be credited to this account; the cost of repairs to property of others if provided for in this account must be charged to this account.
# C_2007082EN.01001901.xml

| 14.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/19

---

Action brought on 1 February 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic

(Case C-40/07)

(2007/C 82/34)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: D. Recchia, J.-B. Laignelot, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Italian Republic

Defendant:

Forms of order sought

| — | Declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2001 on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment (1), the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 13(1) of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2001 on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment (1), the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 13(1) of that directive;

1

| — | order the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The time-limit for transposition of Directive 2001/42/EC expired on 21 July 2004.

---

(1)  OJ 2001 L 197, p. 30.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gouverneur Bancorp Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard
F. Bennett, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes -Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by
                  the Report.


May 11, 2006                      By: /s/ RICHARD F. BENNETT
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Richard F. Bennett
                                      President and Chief Executive Officer


         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code in accordance with Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall
not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be
deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act
of 1933 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                                       28
EXHIBIT 10.66
                        GLENWOOD CAPITAL PARTNERS I, L.P.
                                  9150 Glenwood
                           Overland Park, Kansas 66212

Advanced Nutraceuticals, Inc.
106 S. University Boulevard, #14
Denver, CO  80209

Attention: Gregory Pusey, President

Dear Greg:

This letter shall  constitute a Conversion  Notice  pursuant to Section 3 of the
Additional Terms and Conditions of the Subordinated  Convertible Promissory Note
dated July 19, 2002 (the "Note")  pursuant to which Glenwood  Capital Partner I,
L.P.  ("Glenwood")  elects to convert $176,275.34 of principal and interest owed
to it  pursuant  to the Note  into  320,501  shares  of the  common  stock  (the
"Securities")of  Advanced  Nutraceuticals,  Inc. (the  "Company").  On behalf of
Glenwood, I confirm to you the following representations:

1.   The  Securities to be issued will be evidenced by a certificate  which will
     have imprinted on its face a "restricted" legend noting that the securities
     have not been  registered  under  the U.S.  securities  laws and may not be
     resold except  pursuant to an effective  registration  statement  under the
     U.S.  Securities  Act of 1933  (the  "Securities  Act") or  pursuant  to an
     exemption from registration, the availability of which is to be established
     to the Company's satisfaction. Glenwood will not sell or otherwise transfer
     any of the Securities unless registered or pursuant to an exemption;

2.   The Company will lodge "stop transfer" instructions in its transfer records
     concerning the "restricted" nature of the securities to be issued;

3.   Glenwood has no knowledge of any legal restrictions  applicable to Glenwood
     which would preclude the issuance of the shares to Glenwood;

4.   Glenwood is acquiring  the  Securities  for its own account and will not be
     acquiring the shares  pursuant to a plan to resell or otherwise  distribute
     the shares;

5.   Glenwood  has the legal  right and power to acquire the  Securities  and to
     make the representations to the Company in this letter.

6.   Glenwood  has had the  opportunity  to  review  information  regarding  the
     Company and has had the opportunity to ask questions of and receive answers
     from   representatives   of  the  Company  and  to  obtain  any  additional
     information desired by it.

                                                Sincerely yours,


Dated as of August 26, 2002                     By:  /s/ Randall D. Humphreys
                                                     --------------------------
                                                     Randall D. Humphreys
                                                     Authorized Representative
Enclosures

cc:      Robert M. Bearman
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.10


FIRST AMENDMENT 
TO THE
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


APRIL 5, 2015
WHEREAS, TESCO CORPORATION, a corporation organized under the laws of the province of Alberta, Canada (the “Company”) and Fernando Assing (“Executive”) entered into the Employment Agreement effective on December 19, 2014 (the “Agreement”); and
WHEREAS, the Agreement sets forth that Executive’s Base Annual Salary in effect at this time is FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($500,000); and
WHEREAS, Executive and the Company (the “Parties”) have now agreed that, as a result of certain changes in market conditions, effective April 5, 2015 Executive’s Base Annual Salary shall be FOUR HUNDRED SEVENTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($475,000), reflecting a 5% reduction from Executive’s Base Annual Salary as set forth by the Agreement (the “Reduction”); and
WHEREAS, the Company and Executive agree that this Reduction is immaterial under Section 5(a) of the Agreement, and that this Reduction shall not constitute a Good Reason under the Agreement; 
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, which the Parties acknowledge is good and valuable consideration, the Parties agree to the amendment of the Agreement as follows (this “Amendment”): 
The first sentence of Section 5(a) shall be replaced with the following:
“Executive shall receive a Base Annual Salary annually of FOUR HUNDRED SEVENTY-FIVE U.S. dollars and no cents ($475,000.00 U.S.) payable in bi-weekly pay periods, subject to deduction of statutorily required amounts, including but not limited to, withholding for federal, state and local income taxes, and amounts payable by employees of Employer for employee benefits.” 
Executive, by executing this Amendment, agrees that the Reduction and amendment of Section 5(a) of the Agreement as provided in this Amendment are immaterial under Section 5(a) of the Agreement and shall not constitute Good Reason under the Agreement, and Executive waives any claims or rights he may have as a result of the Reduction and the amendment of Section 5(a); provided, however,  that Employee reserves the right to consider whether further diminution to the Base Annual Salary during the calendar year 2015 along with  this Reduction may constitute Good Reason under the Agreement without limiting the other requirements in the Agreement for Executive to terminate his employment for Good Reason, including the notice provisions in Section 6(e).











IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment to the Agreement effective as of April 5, 2015.
EXECUTIVE
Fernando Assing


Signature:  /s/ Fernando Assing
    


Date:  03/30/2015




EMPLOYER:




Tesco Corporation






By:      /s/ Michael Sutherlin
                               Michael Sutherlin,
                              Chairman of the Board of Directors


Date:  03/30/2015
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

NETWORK-1 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, HEWLETT 

PACKARD ENTERPRISE COMPANY,

Defendants-Cross-Appellants

______________________

2018-2338, 2018-2339, 2018-2395, 2018-2396

______________________

Appeals from the United States District Court for the 

Eastern District of Texas in Nos. 6:11-cv-00492-RWS, 6:13-

cv-00072-RWS, Judge Robert Schroeder, III.

______________________

ON PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING

______________________

Before PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and BRYSON, Circuit 

Judges.

PER CURIAM.

O R D E R

Appellant Network-1 Technologies, Inc. filed a petition 

for panel rehearing. A response to the petition was invited 

by the court and filed by Cross-Appellants HewlettCase: 18-2338 Document: 80 Page: 1 Filed: 11/20/2020
NETWORK-1 TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. HEWLETT-PACKARD 

COMPANY

2

Packard Company and Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company. Cross-Appellants also separately filed a petition for 

panel rehearing.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) Appellant’s petition for panel rehearing is granted 

to the extent that the previous precedential opinion 

and judgment issued September 24, 2020, are withdrawn and replaced with the modified precedential 

opinion and judgment accompanying this order.

(2) Cross-Appellants’ petition for panel rehearing is denied.

(3) The mandate of the court shall issue on December 

28, 2020.

 FOR THE COURT

 November 20, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court

Case: 18-2338 Document: 80 Page: 2 Filed: 11/20/2020
Exhibit 32.b



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc N. Teal, Principal Financial Officer of the general partner of the general partner of the Partnership's general partner, C&M Management Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)-15 or 15(d)-15 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                        
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.



|Date:           |  |                            
|--------------- |  | ---------------------------
|August 20, 2007 |  | /s/ Marc N. Teal           
|                |  |                            
|                |  | Marc N. Teal               
|                |  | Principal Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other

document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request
### §80b–16. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Aug. 22, 1940, ch. 686, title II, §216, 54 Stat. 857, which required the Securities and Exchange Commission to submit an annual report to Congress on the work of the Commission, terminated, effective May 15, 2000, pursuant to section 3003 of Pub. L. 104–66, as amended, set out as a note under section 1113 of Title 31, Money and Finance. See, also, page 191 of House Document No. 103–7.
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 23.1






INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements
No. 333-24695, No. 333-44923, No. 333-45327, No. 333-59779, and No. 333-85143
of Encad, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated February 18, 2000, appearing in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Encad, Inc. for the year ended December
31, 1999.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

San Diego, California
March 30, 2000
#### § 385.1011 Final order (Rule 1011).

The Commission will issue a final order, affirming, modifying or vacating the contested order or directing other appropriate relief.
DATE

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

RURAL UTILITIES SERVICE

CONSTRUCTION CHANGE ORDER PROJECT LINE SHEET NO.

ORDER NO. POLES NO. REFER TO ITEM NO.

CHANGE

REASON FOR CHANGE

CHANGE AUTHORIZED BY:

SYSTEM MANAGER BORROWER'S ENGINEER

ITEMIZED COST OF ABOVE ORDER

CONTRACTOR

RUS Form 216 (Rev. 7-67)

According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information 

unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 0572-0059.. The time required to complete this 

information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and 

maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information.
**COVID-19 Sample Revised Budget and Justification**

Please submit a document that includes the following:

· The current budget amount by category

· The proposed re-budget amount by category

· If applicable, the non-federal match by category

· Total revised budget by category

For example:

**ABC Organization Re-Budget:**

***If applicable, NON-FEDERAL MATCH:** If your grant program has a matching requirement, enter the amount of non-federal funds you will contribute to the grant.  Refer to your Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) or NoA for matching requirements.

**Include an explanation for the re-budget of each category due to COVID-19.  For example:**

**Personnel**– *Explain any changes to personnel (including key personnel), such as additional staff to support GPRA activities.*

*Please note if key personnel, such as the Project Director, will be separated from the project for more than three months or a 25% reduction in the PD’s level of effort than a**change in key personnel**must be submitted as well.*

**Fringe** – *Explain whether you propose to provide additional sick leave or other fringe benefit as a result of COVID-19 and thus, your fringe rate is expected to increase.*

**Supplies** – *Explain whether costs shown are for purchasing personal protective gear or other protective supplies for recipients providing services to clients receiving treatment.*

**Equipment**– *Explain whether the costs shown are for equipment to support teleservices/telehealth/telework due to COVID-19 and how the additional equipment will be used to accomplish the goals and objectives of the project.  If laptops will be purchased, describe how the laptops will be used to support teleservices/ telehealth/ telework or to support GPRA data collection to accomplish the goals and objectives of the project.*

**Travel** – *Explain whether costs, such as unrecovered travel and registration expenses, are associated with the cancellation of previously budgeted conferences and other planned events.  Also, describe whether changes to your previously budgeted travel costs are due to re-scheduling or a reduction in travel.*

**Contractual** –*Explain whether subcontractor costs have changed because you have engaged providers that are safely able to continue services.  Explain other changes in contractual costs due to COVID-19, such as additional support for GPRA activities.*

**Other** – *Explain any of the changes in these costs.  Note that recipients are **not** allowed to re-purpose funds to purchase food/meals for clients.*

2
Exhibit 10.1


 


 


 


 


See English Translation, Exhibit 10.2 to this current report



    	 	 	 



     

    

 


 


 


See English Translation, Exhibit 10.2 to this current report






    	 	 	 



     

    




 

See English Translation, Exhibit 10.2 to this current report
### §634e. Assistance of Government agencies

Each department, agency, and instrumentality of the Federal Government is authorized and directed to furnish to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy such reports and other information as he deems necessary to carry out his functions under sections 634a to 634g of this title.

(Pub. L. 94–305, title II, §205, June 4, 1976, 90 Stat. 670.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Small Business Act which comprises this chapter.