alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF
RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
POWER 3 MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.

Under Section 805 of the New York Business
Corporation Law

The
undersigned, being the President of Power 3 Medical Products, Inc., a
corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of New York (the
Corporation),
hereby certifies as follows:

A.
The name of the Corporation is Power 3 Medical Products, Inc. The Corporation
was incorporated on May 7, 1993, with the name Sheffeld Acres Inc.

B.
The Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation, as amended, is hereby
amended to increase the total number of authorized shares of Common Stock of
the Corporation. The first paragraph of Article IV shall now read in its entirety:

The
aggregate number of shares of capital stock that the Corporation shall have
authority to issue is Six Hundred Fifty Million (650,000,000), of which Six
Hundred Million (600,000,000) shares shall be Common Stock, having a par value
of $.001 per share, and Fifty Million (50,000,000) shares shall be Preferred
Stock, having a par value of $.001 per share.

C.
The Board of Directors of the Corporation has duly authorizing the
above-referenced amendment and calling for a vote of the shareholders of the
Corporation on such amendment.

D.
The shareholders of the Corporation holding a majority of all outstanding
shares entitled to vote duly approved the above-referenced amendment at a
special meeting of the shareholders.

*  *  *  *  *

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate of Amendment to be
signed as of January 29, 2009.

| |                                |                              
| | ------------------------------ | -----------------------------
| | POWER 3 MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.
| |                               
| |                                | /s/Ira L. Goldknopf          
| |                                |                              
| |                                | Ira L.
  Goldknopf, President

---
Rural Community Development Initiative Grants 

What does this 

program do? 

This program provides funding 

to help non-profit housing 

and community development 

organizations support housing, 

community facilities, and 

community and economic 

development projects in rural areas. 

Who may apply 

for this program? 

• Public bodies

• Nonprofit organizations

• Federally recognized Tribes

What is an eligible area? 

Rural and rural area-Any area 

other than (i) a city or town that has 

a population of greater than 50,000 

inhabitants; and (ii) the urbanized area 

contiguous and adjacent to such city 

or town. 

How may funds be used? 

• To improve housing, community

facilities, and community and

economic development projects in

rural areas.

• Rural Community Development

Initiative grants may be used for,

but are not limited to:

0 Training sub-grantees to conduct: 

1. Home-ownership education

2. Minority business

entrepreneur education

0 Providing technical assistance to 

sub-grantees on: 

1. Strategic plan development

2. Accessing alternative

funding sources

3. Board training

4. Developing successful child

care facilities

5. Creating training tools,

such as videos, workbooks,

and reference guides

6. Effective fundraising techniques

What kind of funding is available? 

• Minimum grant award is $50,000; 

maximum grant award is $500,000.

• Grant funds are limited and

are awarded through a competitive 

process.

Are matching funds required? 

• Matching fund requirement equal to

amount of grant.

• In-kind contributions cannot be used

as matching funds.

• Partnerships with other federal,

state, local, private, and nonprofit

entities are encourage.

How do we get started? 

• Applications are accepted on an

annual basis through a Notice of

Funding Availability (NOFA) in the

Federal Register.

• Program Resources are available

online (includes forms needed,

guidance, certifications etc.).

Who can answer questions? 

Contact your local RD office. 

What governs this program? 

Code of Federal Regulation; 2 CFR 200 

and Guidelines announced in NOFA, 

published in the Federal Register. 

NOTE: Because citations and other information may be subject to change, 

please always consult the program instructions listed in the section above

titled "What Governs This Program?" You may also contact your local office for 

assistance. You will find additional forms, resources, and program information at 

rd.usda.gov. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender. 

Last Updated May 2023
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1385

To require that jewelry boxes imported from another country be indelibly

marked with the country of origin.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 16, 1999

Mr. REED introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to

the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To require that jewelry boxes imported from another country

be indelibly marked with the country of origin.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. MARKING OF IMPORTED JEWELRY BOXES.

4 (a) MARKING REQUIREMENT.—By no later than the

5 date that is 1 year after the date of enactment of this

6 Act, the Secretary of the Treasury shall prescribe and im7 plement regulations that require that all jewelry boxes de8 scribed in subsection (b) that enter, or are withdrawn from

9 warehouse for consumption, in the customs territory of the

10 United States have the English name of the country of
2

S 1385 IS

1 origin indelibly marked in a conspicuous place on such

2 jewelry boxes by cutting, die-sinking, engraving, stamping,

3 or some other permanent method. The exceptions from

4 marking requirements provided for in section 304 of the

5 Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1304) shall not apply to

6 jewelry boxes subject to this section.

7 (b) JEWELRY.—The jewelry boxes referred to in sub8 section (a) are jewelry boxes provided for in headings

9 4202.92.60, 4202.92.90, and 4202.99.10 of the Har10 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States.

Æ
#### Sharlene Sullivan, Appellant, v DRA Imaging, P.C., et al., Respondents.

[824 NYS2d 636]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Nicholas Figueroa, J.), entered April 6, 2005, which denied plaintiffs motion to set aside the jury verdict in favor of defendants as against the weight of the evidence, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The jury’s findings that plaintiffs injuries are not causally related to the accident required resolution of conflicting expert testimony and attendant credibility determinations, and is supported by a fair interpretation of the evidence *(see Nicastro v Park,*113 AD2d 129 [1985]; *Watts v State of New York,*25 AD3d 324 [2006]; *Torricelli v Pisacano,*9 AD3d 291 [2004], *lv denied*3 NY3d 612 [2004]). While defendants’ neurologist’s reference to certain findings in an unproduced 1991 paper by the American Academy of Neurology was impermissible hearsay that should have been disallowed, the error was rendered harmless by the neurologist’s testimony, on cross-examination, that the paper was “oüt-of-date” and under reconsideration by the Academy. We note that the neurologist’s opinion with respect to plaintiffs brain injury was based predominantly on his own examination and testing of plaintiff, and that his reference to the 1991 paper was to explain why he, unlike plaintiffs neurological expert, did not use a EET scan study to evaluate plaintiffs claimed brain trauma. We have considered plaintiffs remaining contentions and find them without merit. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.E, Friedman, Nardelli, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.
USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

Rural Development

Rural Utilities Service

1400 Independence Ave SW

Room 2868 Stop 1599

Washington, DC 20250

Voice 202.690.4673

April 6, 2021

USDA Rural Utilities Services

Telecommunications Program

Announces Subcontract Waiver Approval

This notice is waiving the requirement to submit subcontracts for RUS approval 

under the RUS Infrastructure Program.

The Infrastructure Program’s construction procedures are governed by 7 CFR 1753. 

Section 1753.9 implements a requirement that all subcontracts to any of the RUS 

construction contracts must be approved by RUS. 

7 CFR 1753.9(d), which provides that: “[a]s stated in the contract, construction 

shall not be performed by the subcontractor before approval of the subcontract by 

RUS.” Also noteworthy is the immediate subparagraph before, subparagraph (c), 

which states that: “[a]s stated in contract Forms 257, 395, and 515, the contractor 

shall bear full responsibility for the acts and omissions of the subcontractor and is 

not relieved of any obligations to the borrower and to the Government under the 

contract.” 

The RUS Administrator is waiving the requirement under 7 CFR 1753.9(d) to 

submit subcontracts for RUS approval. Please note that the RUS borrower must 

still approve the subcontract and receive the approval of the surety if the contract 

was bonded. In addition, although RUS will no longer approve the subcontracts, the 

total amounts of the subcontracts for any specific contract cannot exceed the 50% 

cap identified in 7 CFR 1753. Only the requirement to submit the subcontracts for 

RUS approval is being waived. All other requirements are still being enforced.
(38 South. 949.)

No. 15,672.

#### STATE v. MONTGOMERY et al.

(June 19, 1905.)

CRIMINAL LAW — VENUE—CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.

Section 988 of the Revised Statutes, authorizing the trial of an offense in a court other than that of the parish in which it was committed, provided it be committed within 100 .yards of the boundary line, is unconstitutional, being in conflict with article 9 of the Constitution, which requires that “all trials shall take place in the parish where the offence was committed.”

(Syllabus by the Court.)

Charles W. Montgomery and Alex Andrews were convicted of gambling, and apply for writ of prohibition.

Judgment reversed.

Ellis & Dorsett and Bernard Titehe, for applicants. Respondent judge, pro se. Walter Guión, Atty. Gen., and Riley Joseph Wilson, Dist. Atty. (Lewis Guión, of counsel), for the State.

PROYOSTY, J.

The offense alleged against the defendants in this case, that of gambling with dice, is alleged to have been committed within the parish of Franklin, “within 100 yards of the boundary line of the parish of Franklin aforesaid.”

The defendants, before trial and before plea, excepted to the jurisdiction of the court, on the ground that the offense had been committed, if at all, in the parish of Madison, outside of the parish of Franklin; and in the trial of the exception it was ad-' mitted that such was the fact.

Section 988 of the Revised Statutes provides that an offense may be tried by the court of a parish on whose boundary line, or within 100 yards of whose boundary line, it was committed. In view of that statute, the court overruled the exception.

The Constitution (article 9) provides that “all trials shall take place in the parish where the offence was committed, unless the venue be changed.”

Defendants contend that the said statute is unconstitutional in so far as it authorizes the trial of an offense to take place in the court of a parish other than that in which it was committed.. This court had occasion to consider that question in the case of State v. Harris, 107 La. 325, 31 South. 782. The point was held in that case to have been waived by going to trial without objection. In the present instance the objection was timely made, and the question is squarely presented. For the reasons assigned by Mr. Justice Blanchard in his dissenting opinion in the Harris Case, published in 31 South. 782, and at page 333 of 107 La., the exception should have been sustained if the offense was committed in the parish of Madison and not in the parish of Franklin.

The judgment is therefore set aside, and the case is remanded to be proceeded with according to law.
### Part B—Special Demonstration Projects
# C_2013114EN.01004601.xml

| 20.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 114/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 114/46

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 26 February 2013 — Labiri v EESC

(Case F-124/10) (1)

1

(Civil Service - Duty to provide assistance - Article 12a of the Staff Regulations - Psychological harassment - Administrative inquiry)

2013/C 114/68

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Vassilliki Labiri (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, É. Marchal and D. Abreu Caldas, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Economic and Social Committee (represented by: M. Arsène and L. Camarena Januzec, acting as Agents, and M. Troncoso Ferrer and F.-M. Hislaire, lawyers)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Civil service — Application for annulment of the decision to terminate without further action the administrative inquiry initiated as a result of the complaint of psychological harassment lodged by the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of 18 January 2010 of the Secretary General of the European Economic and Social Committee; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of 18 January 2010 of the Secretary General of the European Economic and Social Committee;

| 2. | Orders the European Economic and Social Committee to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Ms Labiri. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Economic and Social Committee to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Ms Labiri.

---

(1)  OJ C 63, 26.2.2011, p. 34.

1

---
### §713. Nonappropriated fund instrumentalities: contracts with other agencies and instrumentalities to provide or obtain goods and services

The Coast Guard Exchange System, or a morale, welfare, and recreation system of the Coast Guard, may enter into a contract or other agreement with any element or instrumentality of the Coast Guard or with another Federal department, agency, or instrumentality to provide or obtain goods and services beneficial to the efficient management and operation of the Coast Guard Exchange System or that morale, welfare, and recreation system.

(Added Pub. L. 108–293, title II, §202(a), Aug. 9, 2004, 118 Stat. 1031, §152; renumbered §713, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §106(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4203.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 713 was renumbered section 3714 of this title.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 152 of this title as this section.
EXHIBIT 32.2

ORTHOVITA, INC.

CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

REQUIRED BY RULE 13A-14(B) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

AND 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350

I, Albert J. Pavucek, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of Orthovita, Inc., a Pennsylvania
corporation (the Company), hereby certify that:

(1) The Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Albert J. Pavucek, Jr.Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)


Date: March 17, 2008
#### § 1304.1 Scope and intent.

The Tennessee Valley Authority Act of 1933 among other things confers on TVA broad authority related to the unified conservation and development of the Tennessee River Valley and surrounding area and directs that property in TVA's custody be used to promote the Act's purposes. In particular, section 26a of the Act requires that TVA's approval be obtained prior to the construction, operation, or maintenance of any dam, appurtenant works, or other obstruction affecting navigation, flood control, or public lands or reservations along or in the Tennessee River or any of its tributaries. By way of example only, such obstructions may include boat docks, piers, boathouses, buoys, floats, boat launching ramps, fills, water intakes, devices for discharging effluent, bridges, aerial cables, culverts, pipelines, fish attractors, shoreline stabilization projects, channel excavations, and floating cabins as described in § 1304.101. Any person considering constructing, operating, or maintaining any such obstruction on a stream in the Tennessee River Watershed should carefully review the regulations in this part and the 26a Applicant's Package before doing so. The regulations also apply to certain activities on TVA-owned land alongside TVA reservoirs and to land subject to TVA flowage easements. TVA uses and permits use of the lands and land rights in its custody alongside and subjacent to TVA reservoirs and exercises its land rights to carry out the purposes and policies of the Act. In addition, the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), as amended, 42 U.S.C. 4321 *et seq.,* and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972 (FWPCA), 33 U.S.C. 1251 *et seq.,* have declared it to be congressional policy that agencies should administer their statutory authorities so as to restore, preserve, and enhance the quality of the environment and should cooperate in the control of pollution. It is the intent of the regulations in this part 1304 to carry out the purposes of the Act and other statutes relating to these purposes, and this part shall be interpreted and applied to that end.

[68 FR 46936, Aug. 7, 2003, as amended at 83 FR 44472, Aug. 31, 2018]
#### § 381.32 Access to establishments.

[See § 300.6 of this chapter regarding access to establishments and other places of business.]

[69 FR 255, Jan. 5, 2004]
### §1720. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out this chapter.

(Pub. L. 90–448, title XIV, §1422, formerly §1421, Aug. 1, 1968, 82 Stat. 599; renumbered §1422, Pub. L. 96–153, title IV, §409, Dec. 21, 1979, 93 Stat. 1132.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective upon the expiration of two hundred and seventy days after Aug. 1, 1968, see section 1423 of Pub. L. 90–448, set out as a note under section 1701 of this title.
|   | (1) | the      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  May      17, 2010 | /s/ Helen R. Park                |
|-------------------------------------|----------------------------------|
|                                | Helen      R. Park               |
|                                | Chief      Executive Officer and |
|                                | Chief      Financial Officer     |

----
§ 392.6 Public display. ( a ) All rulemaking petitions filed with FSIS, along with any documentation submitted in support of a petition, will be available for public inspection in the FSIS docket room and will be posted on the FSIS Web site at *http://www.fsis.usda.gov/ .*
( b ) If FSIS cannot readily determine whether information submitted in support of a petition is privileged or confidential business information, FSIS will request that the petitioner submit a written statement that certifies that the petition does not contain confidential information that should not be put on public display. If the petitioner fails to submit the certification within a time specified by FSIS, the Agency will consider the information to be confidential.
( c ) If FSIS determines that a petition, or any documentation submitted in support of a petition, contains information that is exempt from public disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552 *et seq.*) or any other applicable laws or regulations, and that the information would provide the basis for granting the petition, FSIS will inform the petitioner in writing. FSIS will provide the petitioner an opportunity to withdraw the petition or supporting documentation, or modify the supporting documentation to permit public disclosure.
#### § 381.176 Place of maintenance of records.

Every person engaged in any business described in § 381.175(a) shall maintain the records required by § 381.175 at the place of business where such business is conducted, except that, if such person conducts such business at multiple locations, he may maintain such records at his headquarters' office. When not in actual use, all such records shall be kept in a safe place at the prescribed location in accordance with good commercial practices.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 2, 2015

No. 04-15-00481-CV

JOERIS GENERAL CONTRACTORS, LTD.,

Appellant

v.

Rolando s

Rolando CUMPIAN,

Appellee

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-CI-14392

Honorable Stephani A. Walsh, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief has this date been received 

and filed in the above styled and numbered cause. Extension of time to file the Appellant’s brief 

is this date GRANTED. Time is extended to January 22, 2016.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ____________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE

CLERK OF COURT

cc: David B. Gaultney

MehaffyWeber, P.C.

823 Congress Avenue, Suite 200

Austin, TX 78701

Thad D. Spalding

Kelly, Durham & Pittard, LLP

P.O. Box 224626

Dallas, TX 75222

Dinah L. Gaines

Staff Attorney

Bexar County Civil District Courts

100 Dolorosa, Ste. 1.10

San Antonio, TX 78205

Marcella A. Della Casa

Thornton Biechlen Reynold & Guerra

100 N.E. Loop 410, Suite 500

San Antonio, TX 78216

Richard Scott Westlund

KETTERMAN, ROWLAND & WESTLUND

16500 San Pedro, Suite 302

San Antonio, TX 78232