alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1271. Records of interstate shipment

For the purpose of enforcing the provisions of this chapter, carriers engaged in interstate commerce, and persons receiving hazardous substances in interstate commerce or holding such hazardous substances so received shall, upon the request of an officer or employee duly designated by the Commission, permit such officer or employee, at reasonable times, to have access to and to copy all records showing the movement in interstate commerce of any such hazardous substance, or the holding thereof during or after such movement, and the quantity, shipper, and consignee thereof; and it shall be unlawful for any such carrier or person to fail to permit such access to and copying of any record so requested when such request is accompanied by a statement in writing specifying the nature or kind of such hazardous substance to which such request relates: Provided, That evidence obtained under this section, or any evidence which is directly or indirectly derived from such evidence, shall not be used in a criminal prosecution of the person from whom obtained: Provided further, That carriers shall not be subject to the other provisions of this chapter by reason of their receipt, carriage, holding, or delivery of hazardous substances in the usual course of business as carriers.

(Pub. L. 86–613, §12, July 12, 1960, 74 Stat. 379; Pub. L. 91–452, title II, §219, Oct. 15, 1970, 84 Stat. 929; Pub. L. 110–314, title II, §204(b)(4)(B), Aug. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 3041.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2008—Pub. L. 110–314 substituted "Commission" for "Secretary".

1970—Pub. L. 91–452 inserted ", or any evidence which is directly or indirectly derived from such evidence," after "under this section".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1970 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 91–452 effective on sixtieth day following Oct. 15, 1970, and not to affect any immunity to which any individual is entitled under this section by reason of any testimony given before sixtieth day following Oct. 15, 1970, see section 260 of Pub. L. 91–452, set out as an Effective Date; Savings Provision note under section 6001 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure.
P u rsuan t t o 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5, t h e courtha s det erm i n ed that th i s opi n i on * shou l d n otbe pu bl i shedan d i s not preceden texcept u n der t h e li m i t ed c i r c um s t anc e s s e tf

o r t h i n 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5. 4. 

### INTHE UNITED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHEFIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 09- 40205 Su m m ar yC al endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t if f

- A pp el l ee v. B A U D E L O R T IZ , D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or th e S ou t h ernD i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 5: 05- C R
- 229- 5 B ef ore R E AV L E Y , D AV IS, an d H AY N E S , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R IAM: * B au delO rt i z pl ead ed gu i l t y t o conspi ra cy t o t ran sportun docu m en t ed al i en s w i t h i n t h e U n i t ed S t ates f or private f

i n an ci algai n by m e a n s o f a m ot or vehi c l e. The di st r i c tc our t depar t ed upw ar d orvar i ed f r om t he gui deli nes r ange i n i m pos i ng a st at ut ory m axi m um 120- m ont h t er m of i m pri so nm ent . O r t i z has a p p e a le dh is s e n te n c e , a r g u in gt h a t th e d is tr ic t c o u r t im p o s e da n u n r e a s o n a b ly h a r s h s e n te n c e . H e co n te n d s th a t t h e d is tr ic t c o u r t fa ile dto e x p la in a d e q u a te ly United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I LE D October 8, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 09- 40205

2 i t s r e as o ns f

o rupwar d d epa rt u re orv ar i anc e a nd thatt he e xt e nto f t he dep art u re orv a ria n ce i s not sup ported by t h e fact s r el i ed u pon by the di st ri ct c o u r t. W e h a v e r e v ie w e dt h e s e c o n te n tio n s fo rp la in e r r o r . See Uni t e d S t at e sv. Pel t i er , 5 0 5 F .3 d 3 8 9 , 3 9 1 -9 4 (5 th C ir . 2 0 0 7 ), cer t . den i ed , 1 2 8 S . C t. 2 9 5 9 (20 0 8 ). O rt i z w as a l ead er of

an ext en sive conspir acy i n volvi n g t h e t ran sport ati on of m an y al i en s un der da n gerous circ u m stan ces. I n deter m i n i n g t h e sentence, t h e d i s t r i c tc o ur tco ns i d e r e da n da p p l i e dt h e s e n t e n c i n gfa c t o r s o f 1 8 U. S . C. § 3 5 5 3 (a) a n dit ex p l a i n edind eta i lw h y a p p l i ca ti on o f th ose fac tors to th e facts of t h i s c ase sup ported i m posi t i on of a st atutory m axim u m sentence t h at i n volved a n u p w a r dd e p a r tu r e or ava r ia n c e fr o m th e g u id e lin e s im p r is o n m e n t r a n g e . S ee Un i t ed S t ate s v. L opez- V elasqu ez , 5 2 6 F .3 d8 0 4 , 8 0 6 -0 7 (5 th C ir .), cer t . den i ed , 1 2 9 S . C t. 6 2 5 (2 0 0 8 ); seealso Un i t e dS t a t e sv . Wi l l i a ms , 51 7 F . 3 d80 1 , 80 9 ( 5 th Ci r . 2 00 8) . The s e nt e nc e i m po s e d “w as reasonab l e und e rt he t o t ali t y o f t he relev a n t st a tu toryfa ctors.” Un i t ed S t ate s v. B ran t ley , 53 7 F . 3 d34 7 , 34 9 ( 5 th C i r. 200 8) ( qu ot ati on m arks om i t t ed). Th e j u dg m en ti s AF F I RMED.
# CA2007022EN.01000501.xml

| 31.1.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 22/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.1.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 22/5

---

RESERVE LIST
   (1)

RESERVE LIST

1

OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/AD/33/05

OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/AD/33/05

LINGUISTIC ADMINISTRATORS

LINGUISTIC ADMINISTRATORS

(CONFERENCE INTERPRETERS — AD5)

(CONFERENCE INTERPRETERS — AD5)

FOR BULGARIAN (BG)

FOR BULGARIAN (BG)

(2007/C 22 A/02)

Option 2

| BOGOMILOVA ATANASSOVA | Denitza |
| --- | --- |
| CHONEVA | Marina |
| HRISTOVA (GEORGIEVA) | Sashka |
| KARAPETROVA (MARKOVA) | Roumiana |
| NEDYALKOVA (GEORGIEVA) | Daniela |
| NIKOLOVA | Galina Lyubomirova |
| SABEVA (KALINOVA) | Daniela |
| SLAVOVA (IVANOVA) | Krassimira |
| STOITSOVA | Elitsa Ognianova |

BOGOMILOVA ATANASSOVA

Denitza

CHONEVA

Marina

HRISTOVA (GEORGIEVA)

Sashka

KARAPETROVA (MARKOVA)

Roumiana

NEDYALKOVA (GEORGIEVA)

Daniela

NIKOLOVA

Galina Lyubomirova

SABEVA (KALINOVA)

Daniela

SLAVOVA (IVANOVA)

Krassimira

STOITSOVA

Elitsa Ognianova

The reserve list will be valid until 31 December 2007 and may be extended.

31 December 2007

---

(1)  A successful candidate may explicitly request that her/his name not be published.

1

---
§ 314.3 Disposition of condemned products at official establishments having no tanking facilities. ( a ) Carcasses, parts of carcasses, and other products condemned at an official establishment which has no facilities for tanking shall, except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section or elsewhere in this part, be destroyed in the presence of an inspector by incineration, or denatured with crude carbolic acid, or cresylic disinfectant, or a formula consisting of one part FD&C No. 3 green coloring, 40 parts water, 40 parts liquid detergent, and 40 parts oil of citronella or any other proprietary material approved by the Administrator in specific cases. When such product is to be denatured, it shall be freely slashed before the denaturing agent is applied, except that, in the case of dead animals that have not been dressed, the denaturant may be applied by injection. The denaturant must be deposited in all portions of the carcass or product to the extent necessary to preclude its use for food purposes.
( b ) All carcasses and parts condemned on account of anthrax, as identified in § 310.9(b) of this subchapter, at official establishments which are not equipped with tanking facilities shall be disposed of by ( 1 ) complete incineration, or
( 2 ) by thorough denaturing with crude carbolic acid, or cresylic disinfectant, and then disposed of in accordance with the requirements of the particular State or municipal authorities, who shall be notified immediately by the area supervisor.
### §2279e. Approval of disclosure information and issuance of charters

#### (a) Disclosure of information

#### (1) Approval of plan

With respect to any plan of merger, transfer of lending authority, dissolution, or termination, prior to submission to the voters (voting stockholders and, where required, contributors to guaranty funds) of the institutions involved, such plan shall be submitted to the Farm Credit Administration Board, together with all information that is to be distributed to the voters with respect to the contemplated action, including an enumerated statement of the anticipated benefits and potential disadvantages of such action.

#### (2) Notice of approval

On notification that the Farm Credit Administration Board has approved such plan for submission to the stockholders, or after 60 days of no action on the plan by the Board, the submitting institutions may submit the plan, together with the disclosure information, to the voters for the prescribed vote.

#### (b) Notice of reasons for disapproval

If the Farm Credit Administration Board disapproves the plan for submission to the stockholders, notification to the submitting institutions shall specify the reasons for the determination by the Board. If such plan is determined to be inadequate, it shall not be submitted to the voters for a vote.

#### (c) Federal charter

Each plan of merger or transfer of lending authority may include a proposed new or revised Federal charter for the merged or transferee entity. The Farm Credit Administration Board shall issue such charter on the approval of the plan, as prescribed in this subchapter, unless the Board determines that the charter submitted is not consistent with this chapter.

(Pub. L. 92–181, title VII, §7.11, as added Pub. L. 100–233, title IV, §416, Jan. 6, 1988, 101 Stat. 1651; amended Pub. L. 100–399, title IV, §408(p), Aug. 17, 1988, 102 Stat. 1002; Pub. L. 102–237, title V, §502(n), Dec. 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 1870.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1991—Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 102–237 substituted "60 days" for "30 days".

1988—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 100–399 substituted "transfer of lending authority" for "transfer or assignment of lending authority" and "the institutions involved" for "such institutions".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1988 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 100–399 effective as if enacted immediately after enactment of Pub. L. 100–233, which was approved Jan. 6, 1988, see section 1001(a) of Pub. L. 100–399, set out as a note under section 2002 of this title.
§ 98.18 Shipment of embryos to the United States. ( a ) *Release from the embryo collection unit.* Except as provided in § 98.17(h)(1) of this subpart, embryos may not be moved from the embryo collection unit until all tests and examinations required by this subpart have been completed and the Import-Export Animals Staff, Veterinary Services, APHIS, has received written notification of all test results from the Foreign Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory.
( b ) *Route.* The sealed shipping containers must be routed directly to the U.S. port of entry designated on the import permit.
( c ) *Ports of entry.* The embryos may be imported into the United States only through a port of entry listed in § 93.203(a) of this chapter.
( d ) *Date of arrival in the United States.* Embryos that arrive at the port of entry more than 14 days after the proposed date of arrival stated in the import permit will not be eligible for importation into the United States.
[56 FR 55809, Oct. 30, 1991, as amended at 62 FR 56026, Oct. 28, 1997]
### §2230. Surplus and excess Federal equipment

The Administrator shall make publicly available, including through the Internet, information on procedures for acquiring surplus and excess equipment or property that may be useful to State and local fire, emergency, and hazardous material handling service providers.

(Pub. L. 93–498, §35, formerly §33, as added Pub. L. 106–503, title I, §105, Nov. 13, 2000, 114 Stat. 2301; renumbered §35, Pub. L. 108–136, div. A, title X, §1057, Nov. 24, 2003, 117 Stat. 1616.)
#### § 590.955 Labeling of shipping containers of egg products offered for entry.

Shipping containers of imported egg products are required to bear in a prominent and legible manner the name of the product, the name of the country of origin, the foreign inspection system plant number of the plant in which the product was processed, shipping or identification marks, production codes, and the inspection mark of the country or origin. Labeling on shipping containers must be examined at the time of inspection in the United States and if found to be false or misleading, the product must be refused entry.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 5 A0 93 7

. J OSHUA W R I G H T v . GEORGI A DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVI C ES DI VI SI ON OF CHI LD SUPPORT SERVI CES et a l.

J o s h u a W ri gh t fi l ed a co m p l ai n t al l eg i n g t h at h e h ad b een u n l awfu ll y ch arg ed
fo r ch i l d s up p o rt

. Th e t ri al co u rt d i s m i s s ed t h e co m pl ai n t , an d W ri g h t ap p eal ed
d i rect l y t o t h e Su p rem e Co u rt , wh i ch tran s ferred t h e cas e h ere. Becau s e t h i s cas e i n v o l v es ch i ld s u p p o rt , i t i s a d o m es t i c rel at i o n s m at t er wi t h i n t h e m ean i n g o f OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (a) (2 ). See Co l l i n s v

. D a v i s , 3 1 8 Ga. Ap p

. 2 65
, 2 6 6 (1 ) (7 3 3 SE2 d 7 9 8 ) (2 0 1 2); Bo o ker v. Ga

. Dep t

. o f Hu ma n Res o u r ces , 31 7 Ga. Ap p

. 4 2 6 (7 3 1 SE2 d 1 1 0 ) ( 2 0 1 2 )

. Ap p eal s i n s u ch m at t ers m u s t b e tak en b y ap p l i cat i o n fo r d i s cret i o n ar y
ap p eal

. See Bo o ker
, s u p ra. W ri gh t ’ s fai l u re t o f o l l o w t h e ap p ro p ri at e ap p el l at e
p ro ced ure d ep ri v es u s o f ju ri s d i ct i o n t o co n s i d er h i s ap p eal
, wh i ch i s h e r e by
DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t
h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 01/28/2015 January 28, 2015
Exhibit


Exhibit 10.2


Summary of the Registrant's Compensatory Arrangements with Executive Officers


	
			
	Name and Title
	 
	Base Salary for 2016

	F. Thomson Leighton
Chief Executive Officer
	 
	$1

	James Benson
Chief Financial Officer
	 
	$450,000

	Robert Blumofe
Executive Vice President - Platform
	 
	$430,000

	James Gemmell
Executive Vice President - CHRO
	 
	$400,000

	Melanie Haratunian
Executive Vice President and General Counsel
	 
	$430,000

	Robert Hughes
President - Worldwide Operations 
	 
	$530,000

	Rick McConnell
President - Products and Development
	 
	$530,000

	William Wheaton
EVP - Media
	 
	$420,000
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 554 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to take actions necessary to 

ensure that certain individuals may update the burn pit registry with 

the cause of death of a registered individual, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 26, 2019 

Mr. UDALL (for himself and Mr. SULLIVAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to take actions 

necessary to ensure that certain individuals may update 

the burn pit registry with the cause of death of a registered individual, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Burn Pit Registry En5 hancement Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 554 IS

1 SEC. 2. UPDATES OF BURN PIT REGISTRY ESTABLISHED 

2 AND MAINTAINED BY DEPARTMENT OF VET3 ERANS AFFAIRS. 

4 (a) INDIVIDUALS ELIGIBLE TO UPDATE.— 

5 (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days 

6 after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Sec7 retary of Veterans Affairs shall take actions nec8 essary to ensure that the burn pit registry may be 

9 updated with the cause of death of a deceased reg10 istered individual by— 

11 (A) an individual designated by such de12 ceased registered individual; or 

13 (B) if no such individual is designated, an 

14 immediate family member of such deceased reg15 istered individual. 

16 (2) DESIGNATION.—The Secretary shall pro17 vide, with respect to the burn pit registry, a process 

18 by which a registered individual may make a des19 ignation for purposes of paragraph (1)(A). 

20 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

21 (1) The term ‘‘burn pit registry’’ means the 

22 registry established under section 201 of the Dig23 nified Burial and Other Veterans’ Benefits Improve24 ment Act of 2012 (Public Law 112–260; 38 U.S.C. 

25 527 note). 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•S 554 IS

1 (2) The term ‘‘immediate family member’’, with 

2 respect to a deceased individual, means— 

3 (A) the spouse, parent, brother, sister, or 

4 adult child of the individual; 

5 (B) an adult person to whom the indi6 vidual stands in loco parentis; or 

7 (C) any other adult person— 

8 (i) living in the household of the indi9 vidual at the time of the death of the indi10 vidual; and 

11 (ii) related to the individual by blood 

12 or marriage. 

13 (3) The term ‘‘registered individual’’ means an 

14 individual registered with the burn pit registry. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20268-0001

DOCKETS SUBJECT TO AUTOMATIC CLOSURE IN MAY 2024

May 1, 2024

No dockets are subject to automatic closure in May 2024.

Automatic Docket Closure Log

Docket No. Commission Action

PI2014-1 Order No. 2710 issued on September 16, 2015 –

Docket to remain open until April 1, 2016

Order No. 2820 issued on November 17, 2015 –

Docket closed after issuance of final order

MC2015-8 Order No. 3000 issued on January 7, 2016 –

Docket to remain open until the Commission issues 

final order

Order No. 3597 (Docket No. MC2015-8R) issued on 

October 31, 2016 – Docket closed after issuance of 

final order

SS2018-1 Docket automatically closed on July 31, 2019

PI2017-1 Docket automatically closed on March 1, 2021

RM2021-3 Order No. 6208 issued on June 23, 2022 – Docket to 

remain open until the Commission issues final order

RM2022-1 Order No. 6501 issued on May 8, 2023
#### § 592.96 Schedule of operation of official plants.

Inspection operating schedules for services performed pursuant to this part shall be requested in writing and approved by the appropriate District Office. Normal operating schedules for a full-week consist of a continuous 8-hour period per day (excluding but not to exceed 1 hour for lunch), 5 consecutive days per week, within the administrative workweek, Sunday through Saturday, for each shift required. Less than 8-hour schedules may be requested and will be approved if inspection program personnel are available. Clock hours of daily operations need not be specified in the request, although as a condition of continued approval, the hours of operation shall consist of a continuous 10-hour period per day (excluding but not to exceed 1 hour for lunch), 4 consecutive days per week, within the administrative workweek, Sunday through Saturday for each full shift required. Inspection program personnel are to be given reasonable advance notice by management of any change in the hours the inspection service is requested.
**Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 June 2012 —
Organismos Kypriakis Galaktokomikis Viomichanias v OHIM —
Garmo (GAZI Hellim)

(Case T-535/10)**

Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark GAZI Hellim — Prior collective Community word mark HALLOUMI — Relative ground for refusal — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009

Community trade mark — Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark — Relative grounds for refusal — Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services — Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 24, 36-40)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 September 2010 (Case R 1497/2009-4) concerning opposition proceedings between Organismos Kypriakis Galaktokomikis Viomichanias and Garmo AG. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 20 September 2010 (Case R 1497/2009-4); |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders OHIM to pay the costs, including those incurred in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal. |
SUMMARY OF CHANGES FOR THE CANOLA RAPESEED PRICING METHODOLOGY (23-CEPP-M0015)

(Released June 2022)

The following is a brief description of changes to the Canola Rapeseed Pricing Methodology for the 2023 and succeeding 

crop years. Please refer to the Canola Rapeseed Pricing Methodology document below for complete information.

• Language in the final paragraph is modified to update the contract month and periods used to derive factors for 

various regions and planting periods.

• The document was reformatted to be more consistent with other policy documents. 
(1 of 1)

23-CEPP-M0015

(Released June 2022)

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Federal Crop Insurance Corporation

Canola Rapeseed Pricing Methodology

In accordance with the Common Crop Insurance Policy Basic Provisions and the Commodity Exchange Price Provisions: Section 

II – Canola (CEPP), rapeseed prices are derived using factors “determined by RMA.” The methods used to determine these factors 

are explained in this document. 

Data used to derive the rapeseed factor include the 

National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) U.S. 

rapeseed prices and the Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) 

canola futures prices. ICE canola prices are in Canadian 

dollars per metric ton and must be converted to U.S. dollars 

per pound. This conversion is described in the CEPP.

Each year’s U.S. rapeseed price is divided by an average

ICE canola futures price to compute an annual ratio. The 

ICE price used depends on the region as explained in the 

following paragraph. The annual ratios are averaged for a 

10-year period to arrive at a rapeseed factor for each 

region, rounded to nearest one-tenth cent.

Four distinct factors are computed for rapeseed. The ICE 

canola contract month and period used in the calculation 

differs depending on region and planting period. Fall 

planted rapeseed for Idaho, Oregon, and Washington uses 

the harvest year’s November futures contract during the 

prior year’s July 15 to August 14 period. The factor for 

Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, North Carolina, Oklahoma, 

South Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia uses the harvest 

year’s July futures contract during the prior year’s July 15 

to August 14 period. The factor for Alabama and Georgia 

uses the harvest year’s July futures contract during the prior 

year’s August 15 to September 14 period. Spring rapeseed 

uses the harvest year’s November futures contract during 

February.