alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the second
quarter 10-QSB for the fiscal year ending August 31, 1998 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000835412
<NAME> TMS, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                              186,829
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                     1,678,816  
<ALLOWANCES>                        164,589
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  2,890,233
<PP&E>                            3,101,018
<DEPRECIATION>                    1,343,577
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    5,414,178
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               874,677
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                            672,555
<OTHER-SE>                        3,435,326
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      5,414,178
<SALES>                           4,051,305
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  4,051,305
<CGS>                             1,535,700
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     1,535,700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  2,055,408
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     33,049
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   22,474
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     439,680
<INCOME-TAX>                         83,582
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 356,098
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                        356,098
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                           .03
        

</TABLE>
### §1674. Restriction on discharge from employment by reason of garnishment

#### (a) Termination of employment

No employer may discharge any employee by reason of the fact that his earnings have been subjected to garnishment for any one indebtedness.

#### (b) Penalties

Whoever willfully violates subsection (a) of this section shall be fined not more than $1,000, or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

(Pub. L. 90–321, title III, §304, May 29, 1968, 82 Stat. 163.)
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender.

STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Invites Applications for Loans Under the Rural Energy Savings Program 

WASHINGTON, Dec. 15, 2020 – United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Deputy Under Secretary

for Rural Development Bette Brand today invited applications from utilities to help rural families and small 

businesses make cost-saving energy efficiency improvements.

USDA is making funding available under the Rural Energy Savings Program (RESP). Through this program, 

qualified utilities and similar intermediaries can provide loans to rural families and small businesses to help 

them reduce energy costs and make energy efficiency improvements. Additionally, the funds may be used to 

replace manufactured housing units with more energy-efficient ones.

To apply, applicants must submit a letter of intent to RESP@usda.gov. Paper submissions will not be accepted. 

USDA will notify selected applicants in writing to submit a loan application. For application deadlines and 

other details, see page 81178 of the Dec. 15 Federal Register.

USDA encourages applications that will support recommendations made in the Report to the President of the 

United States from the Task Force on Agriculture and Rural Prosperity (PDF, 5.4 MB) to help improve life in 

rural America.

Applicants are encouraged to consider projects that provide measurable results in helping rural communities 

build robust and sustainable economies through strategic investments. Key strategies include:

• Achieving e-Connectivity for Rural America

• Developing the Rural Economy

• Harnessing Technological Innovation

• Supporting a Rural Workforce

• Improving Quality of Life

If you’d like to subscribe to USDA Rural Development updates, visit our GovDelivery subscriber page.

###
§ 416.5 Employee hygiene. ( a ) *Cleanliness.* All persons working in contact with product, food-contact surfaces, and product-packaging materials must adhere to hygienic practices while on duty to prevent adulteration of product and the creation of insanitary conditions.
( b ) *Clothing.* Aprons, frocks, and other outer clothing worn by persons who handle product must be of material that is disposable or readily cleaned. Clean garments must be worn at the start of each working day and garments must be changed during the day as often as necessary to prevent adulteration of product and the creation of insanitary conditions.
( c ) *Disease control.* Any person who has or appears to have an infectious disease, open lesion, including boils, sores, or infected wounds, or any other abnormal source of microbial contamination, must be excluded from any operations which could result in product adulteration and the creation of insanitary conditions until the condition is corrected.
[64 FR 56417, Oct. 20, 1999]
Exhibit 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of SUNBURST ACQUISITIONS V, INC.
(the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending January 31, 2005, (the "Report"), I, Jay
Lutsky, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)	The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the Company's financial position and results of
operations.


July 28, 2005

	/s/ Jay Lutsky
	Chief Executive Officer and
	Chief Financial and
	Accounting Officer
#### Bernhart *v.*Bernhart.

[No. 12,053.

Filed April 29, 1925.]

From Clark Circuit Court; *James W. Fortune,*Judge.

Suit by Alfred J. Bernhart against Eula Bernhart. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals. *Affirmed.*By the court in banc.

*Laurent A. Douglass,*for appellant.

*George C. Kopp*and *Stotsenburg, Weathers & Minton,*for appellee.,

McMahan, J.

From a decree in favor of appellee granting him a divorce on the ground of cruel treatment, appellant appeals and insists that the decision of the court is not sustained by sufficient evidence and is contrary to law. The decision of the questions involved depends entirely upon the weight of the evidence. There is ample evidence to sustain the allegation of cruel treatment as charged in the complaint.

Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit


Exhibit 10.27


SYNOVUS FINANCIAL CORP.
Annual Base Salaries for Named Executive Officers


Set forth below are the base salaries for persons identified as “named executive officers” of Synovus Financial Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2015, as approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors:


	
					
	Name
	Title
	Base Salary

	 
	 
	 

	Kessel D. Stelling
	Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
	$
	979,000
	 

	Thomas J. Prescott
	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	443,930
	 

	Allen J. Gula, Jr.
	Executive Vice President and Chief Operations Officer
	441,613
	 

	Allan E. Kamensky
	Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
	424,360
	 

	J. Barton Singleton
	Executive Vice President and President, Financial Management Services
	409,500
Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY



|                                 |  |                                       
|-------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|                                 | 
|Subsidiary                       |  | State or
Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|                                 | 
|Motient Holdings Inc.            |  | Delaware                              
|                                 | 
|Motient Communications
Inc.      |  | Delaware                              
|                                 | 
|Motient Services Inc.            |  | Delaware                              
|                                 | 
|Motient License Inc.             |  | Delaware                              
|                                 | 
|MVH Holdings
Inc.                |  | Delaware                              
|                                 | 
|Motient Ventures
Holdings Inc.   |  | Delaware                              
|                                 | 
|TerreStar Networks Inc.          |  | Delaware                              
|                                 | 
|TerreStar Global Ltd.            |  | Bermuda                               
|                                 | 
|TerreStar National
Services Inc. |  | Delaware                              
|                                 | 
|TerreStar License Inc.           |  | Delaware                              
|                                 | 
|TerreStar Europe
Limited         |  | United Kingdom                        
|                                 | 
|CCTV Wireless
Inc.               |  | Delaware                              
|                                 | 
|CCTV Wireless I, LLC             |  | Delaware                              
|                                 | 
|Port Merger Corporation          |  | Colorado
#### § 416.14 Maintenance of Sanitation SOP's.

Each official establishment shall routinely evaluate the effectiveness of the Sanitation SOP's and the procedures therein in preventing direct contamination or adulteration of product(s) and shall revise both as necessary to keep them effective and current with respect to changes in facilities, equipment, utensils, operations, or personnel.
#### McELVEEN-HUNTER v. FOUNTAIN MANOR ASSN.

No. 143PA90

Case below: 96 N.C.App. 627

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 allowed 13 June 1990.
#### § 381.18 Authority of applicant.

Any person applying for inspection service may be required at the discretion of the Administrator to demonstrate that the operator of the establishment authorized him to do so.
EX-4.26



 Exhibit 4.26 

Power of Attorney 
 The company, Beijing
Century High-Tech Investment Co., Ltd, registered in the People’s Republic of China (“China”), with enterprise registration number 110000003484202, is the shareholder of Beijing Gamease Age Digital Technology Co., Ltd.
(“Gamease”), holding 100% equity interests of Gamease. The company hereby agrees and irrevocably grants the person (“fiduciary”) who is appointed by the board of Beijing AmazGame Age Internet Technology Co., Ltd.
(“AmazGame”) upon written resolutions from time to time with the following rights during the term of this Power of Attorney: 
 Authorize the
fiduciary as the unique and exclusive attorney of the company and solely represent the company to exercise the shareholder’s all the due rights according to the Chinese laws and Gamease’s Articles of Association (including current and
future amendments from time to time), including but not limited to the right to call the shareholder’s meeting (if applicable), accept the notice regarding the shareholder’s meeting (if applicable) and discussion procedure, participate in
the shareholder’s meeting and exercise the voting right (if applicable , including but not limited to nominate, elect or appoint the director, general manager, financial controller or other senior management personnel, and the matters of
dividend distribution etc.), make any shareholder decision, sell or transfer any or all of the equity interests of Gamease owned by himself/herself. 
 Such
authorization and appointment are based upon the precondition that the fiduciary is acting as an employee of AmazGame or its affiliates. Once the fiduciary loses his/her title or position in AmazGame or its affiliates, or the board of AmazGame
terminates such authorization and appointment in written notice, the authorization and appointment that granted by the company shall be immediately void. The company will designate/authorize the other individual nominated by the board of AmazGame in
written resolutions to exercise all the above shareholder’s due rights. 
 The term of this Power of Attorney has the same term as the Business
Operation Agreement that entered by Gamease, AmazGame and other party in April 15, 2015. If the foregoing Business Operation Agreement is terminated early or extended in accordance with the terms of this agreement, this Power of Attorney shall
terminate at the same time as the Business Operation Agreement, or extend at the same time with the same extension of maturity as the Business Operation Agreement. Within the term of this Power of Attorney, this Power of Attorney shall not be
revised or terminated without the written consent of AmazGame. 
 Beijing Century High-Tech Investment Co., Ltd (Signature/Seal) 

April 15, 2015 

  
 1
# C_2012200EN.01001401.xml

| 7.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 200/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 200/14

---

Judgment of the General Court of 22 May 2012 — Environmental Manufacturing v OHIM — Wolf (Representation of the head of a wolf)

(Case T-570/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for a Community figurative mark representing a wolf’s head - Earlier national and international figurative marks WOLF Jardin and Outils WOLF - Relative grounds for refusal - Detriment to the distinctive character or repute of the earlier mark - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2012/C 200/27

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Environmental Manufacturing LLP (Stowmarket, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister, and M. Atkins, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Société Elmar Wolf (Wissembourg, France) (represented by: N. Boespflug, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 6 October 2010 (Case R 425/2010-2), concerning opposition proceedings between Société Elmar Wolf and Environmental Manufacturing LLP.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Environmental Manufacturing LLP to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Environmental Manufacturing LLP to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 63, 26.2.2011.

1

---
§ 557.2 Eligibility of foreign countries for importation of fish and fish products into the United States. ( a ) The requirements in 9 CFR 327.2(a)(1), (a)(2)(i), (a)(2)(ii)(C)-(I), (a)(2)(iii)-(iv), and (a)(3), for determining the acceptability of foreign meat inspection systems for the importation of meat and meat food products into the United States, apply in determining the acceptability of foreign fish inspection systems for the importation of fish and fish products into the United States. In determining the acceptability of these systems, the Agency will evaluate the manner in which they take into account the conditions under which fish are raised and transported to a processing establishment.
( b ) The countries eligible to export specific process categories of fish and fish products are listed at *http://www.fsis.usda.gov/importlibrary .* Such products must be covered by foreign inspection certificates of the country of origin as required by § 557.4. Products from such countries are eligible under the regulations in this subchapter for entry into the United States after inspection and marking as required by the applicable provisions of this part. .
[80 FR 75616, Dec. 2, 2015, as amended at 84 FR 59681, 59685, 59689, Nov. 5, 2019; 84 FR 65269, Nov. 27, 2019]
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 27 (Friday, February 8, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 9449]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-02866]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity 
and Foreign Air Carrier Permits

    Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B 
(formerly Subpart Q) during the Week Ending January 26, 2013. The 
following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart B 
(formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural 
Regulations (see 14 CFR 301.201 et seq.). The due date for Answers, 
Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below 
for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2013-0018.
    Date Filed: January 23, 2013.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: February 13, 2013.

 Description

    Application of Ultimate JETCHARTERS, LLC requesting authority to 
operate scheduled passenger service as a commuter air carrier.

Barbara J. Hairston,
Acting Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2013-02866 Filed 2-7-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```
```

[113th Congress Public Law 207]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 128 STAT. 2074]]

Public Law 113-207
113th Congress

                                 An Act

 
Designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 25 
   South Oak Street in London, Ohio, as the ``London Fallen Veterans 
     Memorial Post Office''. <<NOTE: Dec. 16, 2014 -  [H.R. 1391]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. LONDON FALLEN VETERANS MEMORIAL POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 25 South Oak Street in London, Ohio, shall be known and 
designated as the ``London Fallen Veterans Memorial Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``London 
Fallen Veterans Memorial Post Office''.

    Approved December 16, 2014.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 1391:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 160 (2014):
            June 17, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 3, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
# C_2007056EN.01004102.xml

| 10.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 56/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 56/41

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 25 January 2007 — de Albuquerque v Commission

(Case F-55/06) (1)

1

(Officials - Reassignment - Article 7(1) of the Staff Regulations - Manifest error of assessment - Principle of equal treatment - Abuse of power - Interest of the service)

(2007/C 56/77)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Augusto de Albuquerque (Woluwé-St-Étienne, Belgium) (represented by: C. Mourato, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and K. Herrmann, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Annulment of the decision of the Appointing Authority of 2 February 2006 dismissing the claim brought by the applicant against the decision of 23 September 2005 of the Director-General of DG INFSO to transfer the applicant in the interest of the service as head of unit INFSO.G.2 ‘Micro and nanosystems’.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders the parties to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the parties to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 154 of 1.7.2006, p. 28.

1

---
### §2057e. Banning of crib bumpers

#### (a) In general

Not later than 180 days after May 16, 2022, crib bumpers, regardless of the date of manufacture, shall be considered a banned hazardous product under section 2057 of this title.

#### (b) Crib bumper defined

In this section, the term "crib bumper"—

(1) means any material that is intended to cover the sides of a crib to prevent injury to any crib occupant from impacts against the side of a crib or to prevent partial or complete access to any openings in the sides of a crib to prevent a crib occupant from getting any part of the body entrapped in any opening;

(2) includes a padded crib bumper, a supported and unsupported vinyl bumper guard, and vertical crib slat covers; and

(3) does not include a non-padded mesh crib liner.

(Pub. L. 117–126, §3, May 16, 2022, 136 Stat. 1208.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Safe Sleep for Babies Act of 2021, and not as part of the Consumer Product Safety Act which comprises this chapter.
§ 541.4 Official export inspection marks, devices, and certificates. ( a ) The official export inspection mark for fish required by part 552 of this subchapter must be in the same form as that specified in 9 CFR 312.8(a) or otherwise as prescribed by the Administrator.
( b ) The official export certificate for fish and fish products required by part 552 must be in the same form as that prescribed for meat and meat food products in 9 CFR 312.8(b) or otherwise as prescribed by the Administrator.
### §2057a. Banning of butyl nitrite

#### (a) In general

Except as provided in subsection (b), butyl nitrite shall be considered a banned hazardous product under section 2057 of this title.

#### (b) Lawful purposes

For the purposes of section 2057 of this title, it shall not be unlawful for any person to manufacture for sale, offer for sale, distribute in commerce, or import into the United States butyl nitrite for any commercial purpose or any other purpose approved under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act [21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.].

#### (c) Definitions

For purposes of this section:

(1) The term "butyl nitrite" includes n-butyl nitrite, isobutyl nitrite, secondary butyl nitrite, tertiary butyl nitrite, and mixtures containing these chemicals.

(2) The term "commercial purpose" means any commercial purpose other than for the production of consumer products containing butyl nitrite that may be used for inhaling or otherwise introducing butyl nitrite into the human body for euphoric or physical effects.

#### (d) Effective date

This section shall take effect 90 days after November 18, 1988.

(Pub. L. 100–690, title II, §2404, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4231.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, referred to in subsec. (b), is act June 25, 1938, ch. 675, 52 Stat. 1040, which is classified generally to chapter 9 (§301 et seq.) of Title 21, Food and Drugs. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 301 of Title 21 and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, and not as part of the Consumer Product Safety Act which comprises this chapter.