alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 93.906 Inspection at the port of entry. ( a ) All live fish, fertilized eggs, and gametes of SVC-susceptible species imported from any part of the world must be presented for inspection at a port of entry designated under § 93.902. The APHIS port veterinarian must be notified at least 72 hours in advance of the arrival in the United States of a shipment of live fish, fertilized eggs, or gametes of SVC-susceptible species. Any shipment of live SVC-susceptible fish species that the port veterinarian determines to exhibit clinical signs consistent with SVCV infection or disease, or any shipments of live fish, fertilized eggs, and gametes of SVC-susceptible species that otherwise do not meet the requirements of this subpart, shall be refused entry.
( b ) Shipments refused entry, unless exported within a time fixed in each case by the Administrator, and in accordance with other provisions he or she may require in each case for their handling, shall be disposed of as the Administrator may direct.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0301)
# C_2012355EN.01002302.xml

| 17.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 355/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 355/23

---

Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — El Corte Inglés v OHIM — Pucci International (PUCCI)

(Case T-39/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark PUCCI - Earlier national figurative and word marks Emidio Tucci and E. TUCCI - Application for the earlier Community figurative mark Emidio Tucci - Relative grounds for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 - Genuine use of the earlier mark - Article 42(2) and (3) and Article 15(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier mark - Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009)

2012/C 355/48

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: El Corte Inglés, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented initially by E. López Camba, J.L. Rivas Zurdo and E. Seijo Veiguela and, subsequently, by J.L. Rivas Zurdo and E. Seijo Veiguela, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Emilio Pucci International BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands), (represented by: P. Roncaglia, G. Lazzeretti, M. Boletto and E. Gavuzzi, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 October 2009 (Case R 173/2009-1), relating to opposition proceedings between El Corte Inglés, SA and Emilio Pucci International BV.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders El Corte Inglés, SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders El Corte Inglés, SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 100, 17.4.2010.

1

---
# C_2010301EN.01005102.xml

| 6.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/51

---

Action brought on 13 September 2010 — ara v OHIM — Allrounder (Representation of a sports shoe bearing the letter A on the side)

(Case T-397/10)

()

2010/C 301/82

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ara AG (Langenfeld, Germany) (represented by: M. Gail, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Allrounder SARL (Saarburg, France)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 23 June 2010 in Case R 1543/2009-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 23 June 2010 in Case R 1543/2009-1;

| — | order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Allrounder SARL.

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark representing a sports shoe with the letter ‘A’ on the side, for goods and services in classes 16, 18 and 25.

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: National word mark ‘A’ for goods in classes 9, 18 and 25.

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition rejected.

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed as inadmissible.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 81 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (1) in so far as the Board of Appeal incorrectly proceeded on the basis that the office arrangements as described by the appellant’s representatives were not such as to prove that all due care required by the circumstances was taken, and accordingly rejected the application for re-establishment of the appellant’s rights with respect to the time-limit for production of the statement of grounds of appeal.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

1

---
cc: Hon. Elizabeth Goff Gonzalez, District Judge 

Sterling Law, LLC 

Sigal Chattah 

Girardi & Keese 

Snell & Wilmer, LLP/Las Vegas 

Snell & Wilmer, LLP/Salt Lake City 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2
# C_2012133EN.01002502.xml

| 5.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 133/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 133/25

---

Order of the General Court of 21 March 2012 — Telefónica v Commission

(Case T-228/10) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - State aid - Aid schemes allowing for the tax amortisation of financial goodwill for foreign shareholding acquisitions - Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market and not ordering the recovery of aid - Act entailing implementing measures - Lack of individual concern - Inadmissibility)

2012/C 133/49

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Telefónica, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J. Ruiz Calzado, M. Núñez-Müller and J. Domínguez Pérez, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal and C. Urraca Caviedes, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Article 1(1) of Commission Decision 2011/5/EC of 28 October 2009 on the tax amortisation of financial goodwill for foreign shareholding acquisitions C 45/07 (ex NN 51/07, ex CP 9/07) implemented by Spain (OJ 2011 L 7, p. 48).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Telefónica, SA is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Telefónica, SA is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 195, 17.7.2010.

1

---
### §2106. Definitions

For purposes of this chapter:

(1) The term "original political item" means any political button, poster, literature, sticker, or any advertisement produced for use in any political cause.

(2) The term "imitation political item" means an item which purports to be, but in fact is not, an original political item, or which is a reproduction, copy, or counterfeit of an original political item.

(3) The term "original numismatic item" means anything which has been a part of a coinage or issue which has been used in exchange or has been used to commemorate a person or event. Such term includes coins, tokens, paper money, and commemorative medals.

(4) The term "imitation numismatic item" means an item which purports to be, but in fact is not, an original numismatic item or which is a reproduction, copy, or counterfeit of an original numismatic item.

(5) The term "commerce" has the same meaning as such term has under the Federal Trade Commission Act [15 U.S.C. 41 et seq.].

(6) The term "Commission" means the Federal Trade Commission.

(7) The term "United States" means the States, the District of Columbia, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.

(8) The term "collectibles certification service" means a person recognized by collectors for providing independent certification that collectible items are genuine.

(9) The term "Trademark Act of 1946" means the Act entitled "An Act to provide for the registration and protection of trademarks used in commerce, to carry out the provisions of certain international conventions, and for other purposes", approved July 5, 1946 (15 U.S.C. 1051 et seq.).

(Pub. L. 93–167, §7, Nov. 29, 1973, 87 Stat. 687; Pub. L. 113–288, §2(3), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3281.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal Trade Commission Act, referred to in par. (5), is act Sept. 26, 1914, ch. 311, 38 Stat. 717, which is classified generally to subchapter I (§41 et seq.) of chapter 2 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 58 of this title and Tables.

The Trademark Act of 1946, referred to in par. (9), is act July 5, 1946, ch. 540, 60 Stat. 427, also popularly known as the Lanham Act, which is classified generally to chapter 22 (§1051 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1051 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

2014—Pars. (8), (9). Pub. L. 113–288 added pars. (8) and (9).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable only to imitation political items and imitation numismatic items manufactured after Nov. 29, 1973, see section 8 of Pub. L. 93–167, set out as a note under section 2101 of this title.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1325 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1325

   To amend the Appalachian Regional Development Act of 1965 to add 
Hickman, Lawrence, Lewis, Perry, and Wayne Counties, Tennessee, to the 
                          Appalachian region.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              July 1, 1999

   Mr. Frist introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Appalachian Regional Development Act of 1965 to add 
Hickman, Lawrence, Lewis, Perry, and Wayne Counties, Tennessee, to the 
                          Appalachian region.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADDITIONS TO APPALACHIAN REGION.

    Section 403 of the Appalachian Regional Development Act of 1965 (40 
U.S.C. App.) is amended in the undesignated paragraph relating to 
Tennessee--
            (1) by inserting ``Hickman,'' after ``Hawkins,'';
            (2) by inserting ``Lawrence, Lewis,'' after ``Knox,'';
            (3) by inserting ``Perry,'' after ``Overton,''; and
            (4) by inserting ``Wayne,'' after ``Washington,''.
                                 <all>
```
...'·

GulfstreamA GENERAL DYNAMICS COMPANY U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Operations

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE. Washington ,DC 20590**~**-;_' r-3 November 16, 2015G-ODA-15-0954 Subject: Exemption No. 13504, Emergency Exit Access, Proposed Application to Derivative Model Aircraft Reference: 1) Regulatory Docket Number FAA-2015-3595 2) FAA Exemption No. 13504 Dear Sirs:Gulfstream Aerospace was granted an exemption from 14 CFR 25.809(a) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations via reference 2). This exemption was granted for the Gulfstream Model GVII-G500. However, Gulfstream's original request was intended tobeforthe GVII-G500 and any future derivatives ofthe GVII-G500. Gulfstream requests this exemption be reconsidered for applicability to derivatives of the GVII-G500 and we request reference 2)be amended to include this allowance.

Ifyou have any questions or need additional information please contact Robert Glasscock at (912) 965- 6817 (via e-mail at robert.glasscock@gulfstream.com) orthe undersigned. Respectfully,Robert GlasscockDirector ODA Programs P.O. Box 2206, MIS R-02 Savannah, GA 31402-2206 robert.glasscock@gulfstream.com(912) 965-6817 Cc: N. Berryman, ACE-120A (via email) B. Whitton, Gulfstream ODA (via email) C. Underwood, ACE-120A (via email) M. Gordon, ANM-113 (via email) J. Nyberg, EASA (via email) P.O. Box 2206 • Savannah, GA 31402-2206 USA • Telephone (912) 965-3000 • gulfstream.com
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Seeks Applications to Help Build and Repair Household Water Systems in 

Rural Communities

Agency Expands the Eligible Use of Funds to Include Septic Systems to Help Rural America Build 

Back Better

WASHINGTON, June 4, 2021 – The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) today announced that 

it is seeking applications for grants from qualified organizations to create loans to help rural homeowners 

finance household water systems.

Funds are being made available under the Rural Decentralized Water Systems Grant program. Through this 

program, USDA awards grants to qualified nonprofit or tribal lending institutions to provide affordable loans to 

homeowners who need new household water systems.

USDA has expanded the use of funds to include building or repairing septic systems. Additionally, lending 

institutions can now use funds to provide grants to homeowners who earn less than 60 percent of area median 

income.

These changes are expected to greatly increase the number of households that can participate in the program, 

providing safe, clean water throughout rural America. 

Eligible applicants are required to provide 10 percent matching funds.

Applications must be submitted electronically at Grants.gov no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on July 19, 

2021.

If you’d like to subscribe to USDA Rural Development updates, visit our GovDelivery subscriber page. 

###

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.2


                         Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-3 Nos. 333-33132, 333-80363, 333-07577) of M.H. MEYERSON & CO., INC. and
in the related Prospectus and in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos.
333-53410, 333-83371) pertaining to the Stock Option Plans of M.H. MEYERSON &
CO., INC. of our report dated March 21, 2002, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of M.H. MEYERSON & CO., INC. included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended January 31, 2002.


                                                   /s/ Sanville & Company

Abington, Pennsylvania
April 30, 2002
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Climateready estuaries progress report [electronic resource].**
 
2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012
 
SuDoc Number:EP 2.44:
Item Number:0473-A-31 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000795634
 
May 16, 2018
§ 9407.3 Open meetings. ( a ) The Commissioners shall not jointly conduct, determine, or dispose of agency business other than in accordance with this section.
( b ) Except as otherwise provided in this part, every portion of every Commission meeting shall be open to public observation.
( c ) No additional right to participate in Commission meetings is granted to any person by this part. Meetings of the Commission, or portions of a meeting, shall be open to public participation only when an announcement to that effect is issued under § 9407.4(b)(4). Public participation shall be conducted in an orderly, non-disruptive manner and in accordance with any procedures as the chairperson of the meeting may establish. Public participation may be terminated at any time for any reason.
( d ) When holding open meetings, the Commission shall make a diligent effort to provide appropriate space, sufficient visibility, and adequate acoustics to accommodate the public attendance anticipated for the meeting. When open meetings are conducted through telephone or similar communications equipment, the Commission shall make an effort to provide sufficient access to the public in a manner which allows the public to clearly hear, see, or otherwise follow the proceedings. The meeting room or other forum selected shall be sufficient to accommodate a reasonable number of interested members of the public. The Commission shall ensure that public meetings are held at a reasonable time and are readily accessible to individuals with disabilities.
( e ) Members of the public attending open Commission meetings may use small electronic audio recording devices to record the proceedings. The use of any other recording equipment and cameras requires advance coordination with and notice to the Commission's Communications Office. The chair or acting chair of the Commission may prohibit, at any time, the use of any recording equipment during a public meeting if he or she determines that such recording would disrupt the orderly conduct of the meeting.
# C_2013344EN.01001802.xml

| 23.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 344/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 344/18

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 September 2013 — Alliance One International Inc. v European Commission

(Case C-679/11 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Spanish market for the purchase and first processing of raw tobacco - Price-fixing and market-sharing - Infringement of Article 81 EC - Whether unlawful conduct of a subsidiary attributable to its parent company - Obligation to state reasons - Fundamental rights - Deterrent effect - Equal treatment - Mitigating circumstances - Cooperation - Unlimited jurisdiction - Ne ultra petita - Right to a fair hearing)

2013/C 344/30

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Alliance One International Inc. (represented by: M. Odriozola and A. Vide, abogados)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre, E. Gippini Fournier, J. Bourke and C. Urraca Caviedes, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 12 October 2011 in Case T-41/05 Alliance One International v Commission reducing the part of the fine imposed on Agroexpansión, for the payment of which Alliance One International, Inc. was held jointly and severally liable with Agroexpansión, and dismissing as to the remainder an application for partial annulment of Commission Decision C(2004) 4030 final of 20 October 2004 relating to a proceeding under Article 81(1) of the EC Treaty (Case COMP/C.38.238/B.2 — Raw tobacco sector in Spain) concerning a cartel aimed at fixing the prices paid to producers and the quantities purchased from them in the Spanish raw tobacco market.

Alliance One International

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal and the cross-appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal and the cross-appeal;

| 2. | Orders Alliance One International Inc. to pay the costs of the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Alliance One International Inc. to pay the costs of the appeal;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs of the cross-appeal. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs of the cross-appeal.

---

(1)  OJ C 73, 10.3.2012.

1

---
Editorial Note on Part 28
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear at 76 FR 76873, Dec. 9, 2011.

§ 28.62 Decision on the record. ( a ) The parties may agree to forego a hearing and request that the matter be decided by the presiding administrative judge based upon the record submitted.
( b ) If the parties agree to forego a hearing under this subpart, the record will close on the date that the administrative judge sets as the final date for the receipt or filing of submissions of the parties. Once the record closes, no additional evidence or argument will be accepted unless the party seeking to submit it demonstrates that the evidence was not available before the record closed.
( c ) In matters submitted for decision on the record under this section, the parties bear the same burdens of proof set forth in § 28.61.
( d ) A decision obtained under this section is a decision on the merits of the case and is appealable as if the matter had been adjudicated in an evidentiary hearing.
[68 FR 69302, Dec. 12, 2003]