alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §4404. Enforcement, regulations, and construction

#### (a) Enforcement

(1) A violation of section 4402 of this title or the regulations promulgated pursuant to this chapter shall be considered a violation of section 45 of this title.

(2) Any person who is found to violate any provision of section 4402 or 4403(a) of this title shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall on conviction thereof be subject to a fine of not more than $10,000.

#### (b) Regulations under section 4402 of this title

(1) Regulations issued by the Federal Trade Commission under section 4402 of this title shall be issued in accordance with section 553 of title 5.

(2) Not later than 180 days after February 27, 1986, the Federal Trade Commission shall promulgate such regulations as it may require to implement section 4402 of this title.

#### (c) Construction

Nothing in this chapter (other than the requirements of sections 4402 and 4403 of this title) shall be construed to limit, restrict, or expand the authority of the Federal Trade Commission with respect to unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the advertising of smokeless tobacco products.

(Pub. L. 99–252, §5, Feb. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 33.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Subsecs. (a) and (c) effective one year after Feb. 27, 1986, see section 11(a) of Pub. L. 99–252, set out as a note under section 4401 of this title.
# Source

Data Source Data Set Focus: Source: CDC Social Vulnerability Index SVI Overall Theme High (.75 or over)SVI information: https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/placeandhealth/svi/index.html  Data Compiled By: IC Data Analytics Division, RD.Innovation.Data@usda.gov

# SVI_Overall_TractLevel_High
### §4659. Additional authorities

#### (a) In general

In carrying out the responsibilities of the Department of Commerce under this chapter, the Secretary may—

(1) enter into agreements, including contracts, grants and cooperative agreements, and other transactions as may be necessary and on such terms as the Secretary considers appropriate;

(2) make advance payments under agreements and other transactions authorized under paragraph (1) without regard to section 3324 of title 31;

(3) require a person or other entity to make payments to the Department of Commerce upon application and as a condition for receiving support through an award of assistance or other transaction;

(4) procure temporary and intermittent services of experts and consultants in accordance with section 3109 of title 5;

(5) notwithstanding section 3104 of title 5 or the provisions of any other law relating to the appointment, number, classification, or compensation of employees, make appointments of scientific, engineering, and professional personnel, and fix the basic pay of such personnel at a rate to be determined by the Secretary at rates not in excess of the highest total annual compensation payable at the rate determined under section 104 of title 3, except that the Secretary shall appoint not more than 25 personnel under this paragraph;

(6) with the consent of another Federal agency, enter into an agreement with that Federal agency to use, with or without reimbursement, any service, equipment, personnel, or facility of that Federal agency; and

(7) establish such rules, regulations, and procedures as the Secretary considers appropriate.

#### (b) Requirement

Any funds received from a payment made by a person or entity pursuant to subsection (a)(3) shall be credited to and merged with the account from which support to the person or entity was made 1

(Pub. L. 116–283, div. H, title XCIX, §9909, as added Pub. L. 117–167, div. A, §103(d), Aug. 9, 2022, 136 Stat. 1389.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (a), was in the original "this division" and was translated as reading "this title", meaning title XCIX of div. H of Pub. L. 116–283, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

1 So in original. Probably should be followed by a period.
§ 72.5 Area quarantined in Texas. The area quarantined in Texas is the quarantined area described in the regulations of the Texas Animal Health Commission (TAHC) contained in §§ 41.14 through 41.22 of title 4, part II, of the Texas Administrative Code (4 TAC 41.14 through 41.22), effective June 23, 2002, which is incorporated by reference. This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies of 4 TAC 41.14 through 41.22 may be obtained from the TAHC at 2105 Kramer Lane, Austin, TX 78758, and from area offices of the TAHC, which are listed in local Texas telephone directories. The TAHC also maintains a copy of its regulations on its Internet homepage at *http://www.tahc.state.tx.us/ .* Copies may be inspected at the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Veterinary Services, suite 3B08, 4700 River Road, Riverdale, MD, or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .* [69 FR 8329, Feb. 24, 2004, as amended at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004]
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 48 (Friday, March 11, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13413-13414]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5626]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP); Meeting

    Studies at the Animal-Human Interface of Influenza and Other 
Zoonotic Diseases in Vietnam, Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) 
IP11-005; The Incidence and Etiology of Influenza-Associated Community-
Acquired Pneumonia in Hospitalized Persons Study, FOA IP11-011; 
Spectrum of Respiratory Pathogens in Acute Respiratory Tract Infection

[[Page 13414]]

Among Children and Adults in India, FOA IP11-012; Influenza Vaccine 
Efficacy in Tropical and Developing Countries, FOA IP11-013; and 
Influenza and Other Respiratory Diseases in Southern Hemisphere, FOA 
IP11-014; initial review.
    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting:

    Time and Date: 8 a.m.-5 p. m., May 12, 2011 (Closed).
    Place: Sheraton Gateway Hotel Atlanta Airport, 1900 Sullivan 
Road, Atlanta, Georgia 30337, Telephone: (770) 997-1100.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance 
with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 
U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis 
and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters To Be Discussed: The meeting will include the initial 
review, discussion, and evaluation of applications received in 
response to ``Studies at the Animal-Human Interface of Influenza and 
Other Zoonotic Diseases in Vietnam, FOA IP11-005; The Incidence and 
Etiology of Influenza-Associated Community-Acquired Pneumonia in 
Hospitalized Persons Study, FOA IP11-011; Spectrum of Respiratory 
Pathogens in Acute Respiratory Tract Infection Among Children and 
Adults in India, FOA IP11-012; Influenza Vaccine Efficacy in 
Tropical and Developing Countries, FOA IP11-013; and Influenza and 
Other Respiratory Diseases in Southern Hemisphere, FOA IP11-014, 
initial review.''
    Contact Person for More Information: Gregory Anderson, M.S., 
M.P.H., Scientific Review Officer, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., 
Mailstop E60, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, Telephone: (404) 498-2293. The 
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 
and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: March 7, 2011.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2011-5626 Filed 3-10-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
-  Home 
-  Safety Awareness 
-  PERI 

# In This Section

                      -  Safety Awareness Overview 
                      -  Pipeline Leak Recognition and What to Do 
                      -  Excavation Enforcement Final Rule                          -  Overview 
                        -  Rule Language 
                        -  Determinations of Adequacy 
                        -  Frequently Asked Questions 
                      -  Pipeline Emergency Responders Initiative (PERI)                          -  Overview 
                        -  PERI FAQs 
                        -  Eastern Region 
                        -  Southern Region 
                        -  Central Region 
                        -  Southwest Region 
                        -  Western Region 
                      -  Safety Awareness Reports Search 
                      -  Historical Pipeline Incidents 
                      -  Pipeline Failure Investigation Reports 
                      -  Marine Damage Prevention 

## Related Links

                  -                                          Pipeline Emergency Responders Initiative                    
                  -                                          Implementation                   
                  -                                          FAQs                   

## Pipeline Emergency Responders Initiative

U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SEWashington, DC20590United States

**Email:**phmsa.pipelinesafety@dot.gov**Phone:**202-366-4595**

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

# Pipeline Emergency Responders Initiative (PERI) Overview
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, February 08, 2017. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, February 08, 2017 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A17A0625. GREGORY BROOKS v. BLUE BIRD CORPORATION et al..
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             731
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,518
<ALLOWANCES>                                       360
<INVENTORY>                                      5,438
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,487
<PP&E>                                          10,697
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,791
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  30,792
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,766
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      8,000
<COMMON>                                            47
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,196
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    30,792
<SALES>                                         24,913
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,913
<CGS>                                           20,618
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,020
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   245
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 725
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (9,695)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (3,525)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (6,170)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (6,170)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (1.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.39)



</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7962

DARRELL L. RICKS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

JAMES PEQUESE, Warden; J. JOSEPH CURRAN, JR.,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.

(CA-03-131)

Submitted: April 15, 2004 Decided: April 22, 2004

Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darrell L. Ricks, Appellant Pro Se. Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Darrell L. Ricks seeks to appeal the district court’s

orders denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254

(2000), and denying reconsideration. An appeal may not be taken

from the final order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U. S. 322, 336 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Ricks has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny Ricks’ motion for a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 22, 2019

No. 04-18-00831-CV

Michael Thomas PAUL,

Appellant

v.

Miguel LOPEZ, Dave Padula, John Stricklin, Javier Zuniga, John Doe I, Det. Spiller, Ron 

Eberhardt, News4 WOAI,

Appellees

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 18-2085-CV-A

Honorable Jessica Crawford, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On December 17, 2018, appellant filed a statement of inability to pay court costs in this 

court. On January 9, 2019, we issued an order setting a deadline for filing a contest to the 

statement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(a),(c); TEX. R. CIV. P. 145. The court reporter responsible for 

filing the reporter’s record in this appeal timely filed a contest to appellant’s statement of 

inability to pay court costs. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145(f)(3).

Therefore, we abate this appeal and remand this case to the trial court. We ORDER the 

trial court to hold an “oral evidentiary hearing” pursuant to Rule 145(f)(5) of the Texas Rules of 

Civil Procedure to determine appellant’s inability to afford court costs. See id. R. 145(f)(5). At 

the hearing, the burden is on appellant to prove his inability to afford court costs. See id. If the 

trial court determines appellant can afford court costs, its order requiring appellant to pay court 

costs must be supported by detailed findings. See id. R. 145(f)(6). We ORDER the trial court to 

file its order and any related findings on or before February 25, 2019. 

Finally, we ORDER (1) the trial court clerk to file, on or before March 7, 2019, a 

limited clerk’s record containing the trial court’s order determining appellant’s inability to afford 

court costs and any related findings; and (2) the court reporter to file, on or before March 7, 

2019, a limited reporter’s record of the contest hearing. All other appellate deadlines are 

suspended pending further orders from this court.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 22nd day of January, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
### §3913. Injury or death in line of duty

When any member of the Auxiliary is physically injured or dies as a result of physical injury incurred while performing any duty to which he has been assigned by competent Coast Guard authority, such member or his beneficiary shall be entitled to the same benefits provided for temporary members of the Reserve who suffer physical injury or death resulting from physical injury incurred incident to service. Members of the Auxiliary who incur physical injury or contract sickness or disease while performing any duty to which they have been assigned by competent Coast Guard authority shall be entitled to the same hospital treatment afforded members of the Coast Guard. The performance of a duty as the term is used in this section includes time engaged in traveling back and forth between the place of assigned duty and the permanent residence of a member of the Auxiliary.

(Aug. 4, 1949, ch. 393, 63 Stat. 556, §832; Pub. L. 93–283, §1(15), May 14, 1974, 88 Stat. 141; Pub. L. 98–557, §15(a)(3)(D), Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 2865; Pub. L. 104–324, title IV, §404(c), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3924; renumbered §3913, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §119(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4236.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 14, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §270 (Feb. 19, 1941, ch. 8, title I, §11, as added Sept. 30, 1944, ch. 453, §7, 58 Stat. 761).

Changes were made in phraseology. 81st Congress, House Report No. 557.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 832 of this title as this section.

1996—Pub. L. 104–324 struck out "specific" after "performing any" in two places and after "performance of a".

1984—Pub. L. 98–557 substituted reference to members for reference to officers and enlisted men after "treatment afforded".

1974—Pub. L. 93–283 included time engaged in traveling back and forth between the place of assigned duty and the permanent residence of a member of the Auxiliary as the performance of a specific duty.
### §4503. Deposit of remainder of excess amount into Treasury as indirect restitution

The amount that remains from the excess amount described in section 4502(c) 1 of this title after all disbursements have been made for a fiscal year under section 4502(d) 1 of this title shall be deposited by the Secretary of the Treasury into the general fund of the Treasury.

(Pub. L. 99–509, title III, §3004, Oct. 21, 1986, 100 Stat. 1884.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 4502(c) and (d) of this title, referred to in text, was repealed by section 4502(e) of this title.

1 See References in Text note below.
#### Yvonne Lewis MONTGOMERY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Toxey E. HALL, M.D., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 78-3061

Summary Calendar.*

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 2, 1979.

Philip Mansour, Stephen L. Thomas, Greenville, Miss., James T. Bridges, Belzoni, Miss., for defendant-appellant.

Wynn & Bogen, Eugene M. Bogen, Greenville, Miss., Frank J. Kaveney, Clayton, Mo., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before GOLDBERG, RONEY and TJOFLAT, Circuit Judges.

*

 Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see *Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al.,*5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to vacate a judgment on grounds of alleged fraud and misconduct by the plaintiff. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(3) provides that a court may relieve a party from a final judgment for those reasons. Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(3). However, the party making the rule 60(b)(3) motion must establish by clear and convincing evidence (1) that the ad*279verse party engaged in fraud or other misconduct and (2) that this misconduct prevented the moving party from fully and fairly presenting his case. *Rozier*v. *Ford Motor Co.,*573 F.2d 1332, 1341 (5th Cir. 1978). The resolution of these two issues is within the trial court’s discretion, and on review, our only inquiry is whether the trial court abused its discretion. *Id.*at 1346.

Defendant argues that the plaintiff’s alleged failure to fully answer two interrogatories constitutes the requisite misconduct. Our cases have held that a party may engage in rule 60(b)(3) misconduct if he fails to disclose evidence he knows about and the production of such evidence was clearly called for “by any fair reading” of the discovery order. *Id.*at 1341. We have carefully examined the record and agree with District Judge William C. Keady’s conclusion that in this case a fair reading of the discovery order did not call for the evidence in question. As Judge Keady stated, “We do not perceive that a request for the names of treating physicians can fairly be said to require the disclosure of all *places*where the plaintiff may have been treated without regard to the presence or absence of a treating physician.” 1

Clearly, then, we cannot conclude that the district court abused its discretion in finding that the defendant failed to establish misconduct by the plaintiff. For this reason, we affirm the trial court's denial of the defendant’s motion to vacate judgment.

AFFIRMED.

1

. In response to the request for the names of treating physicians, plaintiff failed to disclose a clinic she had visited where she had been examined by a nurse.
§ 4.10 Summary action. ( a ) In any situation where the Administrator has reason to believe that any person licensed under the Act has violated or is violating any provision of the Act, or the regulations or standards issued thereunder, and he or she deems it warranted under the circumstances, the Administrator may suspend such person's license temporarily, for a period not to exceed 21 days, effective, except as provided in § 4.10(b), upon written notification given to such person of the suspension of his or her license pursuant to § 1.147(b) of the Uniform Rules of Practice (7 CFR 1.147(b)).
( b ) In any case of actual or threatened physical harm to animals in violation of the Act, or the regulations or standards issued thereunder, by a person licensed under the Act, the Administrator may suspend such person's license temporarily, for a period not to exceed 21 days, effective upon oral or written notification, whichever is earlier. In the event of oral notification, a written confirmation thereof shall be given to such person pursuant to § 1.147(b) of the Uniform Rules of Practice (7 CFR 1.147(b)) as promptly as circumstances permit.
( c ) The temporary suspension of a license shall be in addition to any sanction which may be imposed against said person by the Secretary pursuant to the Act after notice and opportunity for hearing.
[42 FR 10959, Feb. 25, 1977, as amended at 86 FR 66926, Nov. 24, 2021]