alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010179EN.01004401.xml

| 3.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/44

---

Action brought on 20 April 2010 — GEA Group v Commission

(Case T-189/10)

(2010/C 179/77)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: GEA Group AG (Bochum, Germany) (represented by: A. Kallmayer, I. du Mont and G. Schiffers, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

| — | Annul Article 1 of the amending decision, to the extent that it imposes a fine on the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul Article 1 of the amending decision, to the extent that it imposes a fine on the applicant;

| — | In the alternative, reduce the fine imposed on the applicant in Article 1 of the amending decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

In the alternative, reduce the fine imposed on the applicant in Article 1 of the amending decision;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant contests Commission Decision C(2010) 727 final of 8 February 2010, by which the Commission amended its Decision C(2009) 8682 final of 11 November 2009 in Case COMP/38589 — Heat Stabilisers, in relation inter alia to the applicant (‘the amending decision’). The amendment concerns Article 2 Nos 31 and 32 of Commission Decision C(2009) 8682 final concerning the applicant’s joint and several liability.

In support of its claim, the applicant relies on five pleas in law.

First, the applicant claims that its rights of defence have been infringed because it was not heard before the amending decision was adopted or allowed to participate in the procedure in any other way. By its second plea in law, the applicant complains that the reasoning of the amending decision is defective, as it is based only on the failure to comply with the maximum limit under Article 23(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (1) which must be respected ex officio, and does not contain any specific justification with regard to the applicant. By its third plea in law, the applicant complains that there is no legal basis for the amending decision, which has already become final for some addressees or has been invoked before the courts. By its fourth plea in law, the applicant argues that the alteration of the fine to its detriment is not permitted. Finally, the applicant argues that time-bar applies, because the amending decision was adopted after the expiry of the limitation period laid down in Article 25(6) of Regulation No 1/2003.

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (OJ 2003 L 1, p. 1).

---
(,$ 2SHQ 'DWD  4E  86 (QHUJ\ ,QIRUPDWLRQ $GPLQLVWUDWLRQ (,$

KWWSZZZHLDJRYRSHQGDWDTEFIP"VGLG 3(70&56&86$ 

$3, &$//

72 86(

KWWSDSLHLDJRYVHULHV"DSLBNH\ <285B$3,B.(<B+(5(	VHULHVBLG 3(70&56&86$

6(5,(6

1$0(

86 &UXGH 2LO 6WRFN &KDQJH $QQXDO

6(5,(6

,'

3(70&56&86$

6KRZ PH KRZ WR HPEHG D FKDUW RI WKLV VHULHV

2SHQ 'DWD

$3, 4XHU\ %URZVHU

(,$ 'DWD 6HWV ! 3HWUROHXP ! 6XPPDU\ ! 6XSSO\ DQG 'LVSRVLWLRQ ! E\ $UHD ! 86

&KDUW 'DWD

6HULHV 1DPH 3HULRG )UHTXHQF\ 9DOXH 8QLWV

86 &UXGH 2LO  $  7KRXVDQG %DUUHOV

7KRXVDQG %DUUHOV

86 &UXGH 2LO 6WRFN &KDQJH $QQXDO

6HULHV ,' 3(70&56&86$

     











6RXUFH (QHUJ\ ,QIRUPDWLRQ $GPLQLVWUDWLRQ
 (,$ 2SHQ 'DWD  4E  86 (QHUJ\ ,QIRUPDWLRQ $GPLQLVWUDWLRQ (,$

KWWSZZZHLDJRYRSHQGDWDTEFIP"VGLG 3(70&56&86$ 

86 &UXGH 2LO

6WRFN &KDQJH

$QQXDO

 $  7KRXVDQG %DUUHOV

86 &UXGH 2LO

6WRFN &KDQJH

$QQXDO

 $  7KRXVDQG %DUUHOV

86 &UXGH 2LO

6WRFN &KDQJH

$QQXDO

 $  7KRXVDQG %DUUHOV

86 &UXGH 2LO

6WRFN &KDQJH

$QQXDO

 $  7KRXVDQG %DUUHOV

86 &UXGH 2LO

6WRFN &KDQJH

$QQXDO

 $  7KRXVDQG %DUUHOV

86 &UXGH 2LO

6WRFN &KDQJH

$QQXDO

 $  7KRXVDQG %DUUHOV

86 &UXGH 2LO

6WRFN &KDQJH

$QQXDO

 $  7KRXVDQG %DUUHOV

86 &UXGH 2LO

6WRFN &KDQJH

$QQXDO

 $  7KRXVDQG %DUUHOV

86 &UXGH 2LO

6WRFN &KDQJH

$QQXDO

 $  7KRXVDQG %DUUHOV

86 &UXGH 2LO

6WRFN &KDQJH

$QQXDO

 $  7KRXVDQG %DUUHOV

86 &UXGH 2LO

6WRFN &KDQJH

$QQXDO

 $  7KRXVDQG %DUUHOV

86 &UXGH 2LO

6WRFN &KDQJH

$QQXDO

 $  7KRXVDQG %DUUHOV

86 &UXGH 2LO

6WRFN &KDQJH

$QQXDO

 $  7KRXVDQG %DUUHOV

86 &UXGH 2LO

6WRFN &KDQJH

$QQXDO

 $  7KRXVDQG %DUUHOV

86 &UXGH 2LO

6WRFN &KDQJH

$QQXDO

 $  7KRXVDQG %DUUHOV

86 &UXGH 2LO

6WRFN &KDQJH

$QQXDO

 $  7KRXVDQG %DUUHOV

86 &UXGH 2LO  $  7KRXVDQG %DUUHOV
 (,$ 2SHQ 'DWD  4E  86 (QHUJ\ ,QIRUPDWLRQ $GPLQLVWUDWLRQ (,$

KWWSZZZHLDJRYRSHQGDWDTEFIP"VGLG 3(70&56&86$ 

86 &UXGH 2LO

6WRFN &KDQJH

$QQXDO

 $  7KRXVDQG %DUUHOV

86 &UXGH 2LO

6WRFN &KDQJH

$QQXDO

 $  7KRXVDQG %DUUHOV

86 &UXGH 2LO

6WRFN &KDQJH

$QQXDO

 $  7KRXVDQG %DUUHOV

86 &UXGH 2LO

6WRFN &KDQJH

$QQXDO

 $  7KRXVDQG %DUUHOV

86 &UXGH 2LO

6WRFN &KDQJH

$QQXDO

 $  7KRXVDQG %DUUHOV

86 &UXGH 2LO

6WRFN &KDQJH

$QQXDO

 $  7KRXVDQG %DUUHOV

86 &UXGH 2LO

6WRFN &KDQJH

$QQXDO

 $  7KRXVDQG %DUUHOV

86 &UXGH 2LO

6WRFN &KDQJH

$QQXDO

 $  7KRXVDQG %DUUHOV

86 &UXGH 2LO

6WRFN &KDQJH

$QQXDO

 $  7KRXVDQG %DUUHOV

86 &UXGH 2LO

6WRFN &KDQJH

$QQXDO

 $  7KRXVDQG %DUUHOV

86 &UXGH 2LO

6WRFN &KDQJH

$QQXDO

 $  7KRXVDQG %DUUHOV

86 &UXGH 2LO

6WRFN &KDQJH

$QQXDO

 $  7KRXVDQG %DUUHOV

86 &UXGH 2LO

6WRFN &KDQJH

$QQXDO

 $  7KRXVDQG %DUUHOV

86 &UXGH 2LO

6WRFN &KDQJH

$QQXDO

 $  7KRXVDQG %DUUHOV

86 &UXGH 2LO

6WRFN &KDQJH

$QQXDO

 $  7KRXVDQG %DUUHOV

86 &UXGH 2LO

6WRFN &KDQJH

$QQXDO

 $  7KRXVDQG %DUUHOV
 (,$ 2SHQ 'DWD  4E  86 (QHUJ\ ,QIRUPDWLRQ $GPLQLVWUDWLRQ (,$

KWWSZZZHLDJRYRSHQGDWDTEFIP"VGLG 3(70&56&86$
# C_2013352EN.01001201.xml

| 30.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 352/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 352/12

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 October 2013 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v European Commission

(Case T-457/10) (1)

1

(Public service contracts - Tender procedure - External service provision for development, studies and support for information systems (ESP DESIS II) - Classification of a tenderer - Award of the contract - Tendering consortium - Admissibility - Obligation to state reasons - Transparency - Equal treatment - Manifest error of assessment - Non-contractual liability)

2013/C 352/21

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (Athens (Greece)) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis and M. Dermitzakis, lawyers,)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: S. Delaude and N. Bambara, and subsequently by S. Delaude, acting as Agents, and initially by P. Wytinck, and subsequently by B. Hoorelbeke, lawyers,)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application, first, for annulment of the Commission’s decision of 16 July 2010 to classify the applicant’s tender submitted in the context of the call for tenders DIGIT/R2/PO/2009/045, concerning ‘External service provision for development, studies and support for information systems’ (ESP DESIS II) (OJ 2009/S 198-283663), for Lot 2 ‘Off site development projects’, in third, and not first, place and to award the first and second places to other tenderers, and also of all the related decisions of the Commission’s Directorate General for Informatics, including the decisions to award the respective contracts to the tenderers classified in first and second places; and, second, for damages,

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 346, 18.12.2010.

1

---
### §1473. Conventional packages, marketing

#### (a) Noncomplying packages for elderly or handicapped persons; labeling statements

For the purpose of making any household substance which is subject to a standard established under section 1472 of this title readily available to elderly or handicapped persons unable to use such substance when packaged in compliance with such standard, the manufacturer or packer, as the case may be, may package any household substance, subject to such a standard, in packaging of a single size which does not comply with such standard if—

(1) the manufacturer (or packer) also supplies such substance in packages which comply with such standard; and

(2) the packages of such substance which do not meet such standard bear conspicuous labeling stating: "This package for households without young children"; except that the Commission may by regulation prescribe a substitute statement to the same effect for packaging too small to accommodate such labeling.

#### (b) Noncomplying packages for substances dispensed pursuant to orders of medical practitioners

In the case of a household substance which is subject to such a standard and which is dispensed pursuant to an order of physician, dentist, or other licensed medical practitioner authorized to prescribe, such substance may be dispensed in noncomplying packages only when directed in such order or when requested by the purchaser.

#### (c) Exclusive use of special packaging; necessary circumstances

In the case of a household substance subject to such a standard which is packaged under subsection (a) in a noncomplying package, if the Commission determines that such substance is not also being supplied by a manufacturer (or packer) in popular size packages which comply with such standard, it may, after giving the manufacturer (or packer) an opportunity to comply with the purposes of this Act, by order require such substance to be packaged by such manufacturer (or packer) exclusively in special packaging complying with such standard if it finds, after opportunity for hearing, that such exclusive use of special packaging is necessary to accomplish the purposes of this Act.

(Pub. L. 91–601, §4, Dec. 30, 1970, 84 Stat. 1671; Pub. L. 92–573, §30(a), Oct. 27, 1972, 86 Stat. 1231.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

For classification to the Code of "this Act", referred to in subsec. (c), see References in Text note set out under section 1471 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

"Commission" substituted for "Secretary" in subsecs. (a) and (c) and "it" substituted for "he" in subsec. (c) pursuant to section 30(a) of Pub. L. 92–573, which is classified to section 2079(a) of this title and which transferred functions of Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare under this chapter to Consumer Product Safety Commission.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1343 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1343

   To direct the Secretary of Agriculture to convey certain National 
  Forest land to Elko County, Nevada, for continued use as a cemetery.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              July 1, 1999

   Mr. Reid introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To direct the Secretary of Agriculture to convey certain National 
  Forest land to Elko County, Nevada, for continued use as a cemetery.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF NATIONAL FOREST LAND TO ELKO COUNTY, NEVADA, 
              FOR USE AS CEMETERY.

    (a) Requirement To Convey.--The Secretary of Agriculture shall 
convey, without consideration, to Elko County, Nevada, all right, 
title, and interest of the United States in and to the parcel of real 
property described in subsection (b), for use as a cemetery.
    (b) Description of Property.--
            (1) In general.--The property referred to in subsection (a) 
        is a parcel of National Forest land (including any improvements 
        on the land) in Elko County, Nevada, known as ``Jarbidge 
        Cemetery'', consisting of approximately 2 acres and described 
        as the NE\1/4\SW1\1/4\NW\1/4\ of Section 9 T 46 N, R 58 E, 
        MDB&M.
            (2) Survey.--
                    (A) In general.--The exact acreage and legal 
                description of the property to be conveyed under 
                subsection (a) shall be determined by a survey 
                satisfactory to the Secretary.
                    (B) Cost.--As a condition of any conveyance under 
                this section, the County shall pay the cost of the 
                survey.
    (c) Additional Terms and Conditions.--The Secretary may require 
such additional terms and conditions with respect to the conveyance 
under subsection (a) as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect 
the interests of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
§ 416.3 Equipment and utensils. ( a ) Equipment and utensils used for processing or otherwise handling edible product or ingredients must be of such material and construction to facilitate thorough cleaning and to ensure that their use will not cause the adulteration of product during processing, handling, or storage. Equipment and utensils must be maintained in sanitary condition so as not to adulterate product.
( b ) Equipment and utensils must not be constructed, located, or operated in a manner that prevents FSIS inspection program employees from inspecting the equipment or utensils to determine whether they are in sanitary condition.
( c ) Receptacles used for storing inedible material must be of such material and construction that their use will not result in the adulteration of any edible product or in the creation of insanitary conditions. Such receptacles must not be used for storing any edible product and must bear conspicuous and distinctive marking to identify permitted uses.
[64 FR 56417, Oct. 20, 1999]
USDA 

... 

[:=J 

[:=J 

[:=J 

[:=J 

.. 

.. 

- -

2023 RMA Crops' Indemnities 

No Indemnity ($0.00)

$0.01 - $1,000,000.00

$1,000,000.01 - $10,000,000.00 

$10,000,000.01 - $25,000,000.00 

$25,000,000.01 - $50,000,000.00 

$50,000,000.01 - $79,430,751.00 

MapCreationDate:Augus t 02,2023

Layer Credits:USDA&USCensus Bureau

Source:USDARiskManagement Agency -Summary of Busines s

DataCurrent Date:July 31,2023

MapProjection:USAContiguous Albers EqualAreaConic

RMA Risk Management Services Division

Theinformationdisplayedinthis mapis intendedtoserveas anaidindisplayingdataprovidedor s toredby theRiskManagement Agency.It does not modify,replaceor supersedeany USDApublishedpolicy provisions or procedures.

Maps createdby USDARiskManagementAgency arefor spatialandvisualcontext for depictingthebasicinformationfor “where”.Maps arenot consideredasurvey.GeneralReferenceOnly. 

-PublicInformationand is published biweekly.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131695 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 131695 

 COA: 269340 

Wayne CC: 04-007873-01

DESMOND KENNETH CRUMSEY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 30, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t1023 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2006 

 Clerk
#### § 590.26 Egg products entering or prepared in official plants.

Eggs and egg products processed in an official plant shall be inspected, processed, marked, and labeled as required by these regulations. Egg products entering an official plant shall have been inspected, processed, marked, and labeled as required by these regulations.
# C_2010246EN.01003602.xml

| 11.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/36

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 22 July 2010 — H v Council and Others

(Case T-271/10 R)

(Application for interim measures - Common foreign and security policy - National official seconded to the European Union Police Mission in Bosnia and Herzegovina - Decision to redeploy and downgrade - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Admissibility - Lack of urgency)

2010/C 246/62

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: H (Catania, Italy) (represented by: C. Mereu and M. Velardo, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendants: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Vitro and G. Marhic, acting as Agents) and European Commission (represented by: F. Erlbacher and B. Eggers, acting as Agents)

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of the decision of 7 April 2010 of the Head of the European Union Police Mission (EUPM) in Bosnia and Herzegovina having the effect of downgrading and redeploying the applicant.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The Council of the European Union and the European Commission are considered to be the only defendants. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The Council of the European Union and the European Commission are considered to be the only defendants.

| 2. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 3. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Costs are reserved.

---
# C_2013225EN.01006401.xml

| 3.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/64 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/64

---

Judgment of the General Court of 4 June 2013 — Nencini v Parliament

(Joined Cases T-431/10 and T-560/10) (1)

1

(Rules Governing the Payment of Expenses and Allowances to Members of the European Parliament - Travel and parliamentary assistance expenses - Recovery of undue payments - Limitation period - Reasonable period - Rights of the defence - Principle of audi alteram partem - Proportionality)

2013/C 225/142

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Riccardo Nencini (Barberino del Mugello, Italy) (represented by: F. Bertini and M. Chiti, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament (represented initially by N. Lorenz, D. Moore and A. Caiola, and subsequently by N. Lorenz, D. Moore and G. Ricci, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Applications, primarily, for annulment brought against the Decisions of the Secretary General of the European Parliament of 16 July 2010 and 7 October 2010 relating to the recovery of certain sums received by the applicant, a former Member of the European Parliament, in respect of travel and parliamentary assistance expenses unduly paid, the Debit Notes of the Director General of the European Parliament’s Directorate-General for Finances, No 312331 of 4 August 2010 and No 315653 of 13 October 2010, and any other related and/or prior acts and, in the alternative, to remit the applications to the Secretary General of the European Parliament for a fair reassessment of the sum in respect of which recovery is sought.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action in Case T-560/10; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action in Case T-560/10;

| 2. | Orders Riccardo Nencini to pay the costs in Case T-560/10, including the costs relating to the interim proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Riccardo Nencini to pay the costs in Case T-560/10, including the costs relating to the interim proceedings;

| 3. | Orders Case T-431/10 to be removed from the register; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Case T-431/10 to be removed from the register;

| 4. | Orders each party to bear their own costs in Case T-431/10, including the costs relating to the interim proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders each party to bear their own costs in Case T-431/10, including the costs relating to the interim proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 317, 20.11.2010.

1

---
### SUBCHAPTER I—STRUCTURAL ECONOMIC POLICIES AND PROGRAMS INCLUDING TREATMENT OF RESOURCE RESTRAINTS
### §2778. Advancement of public funds to personnel

The Commandant, under regulations prescribed by the Secretary, may advance public funds to personnel when required to meet expenses of members detailed on emergency shore duty. Funds so advanced shall not exceed a reasonable estimate of the actual expenditures to be made and for which reimbursement is authorized by law.

(Aug. 4, 1949, ch. 393, 63 Stat. 534, §488; Pub. L. 98–557, §15(a)(3)(I), Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 2865; renumbered §2778, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §116(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4226.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Derived from title 34, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §885, and title 14, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §3a (May 22, 1928, ch. 688, 45 Stat. 712; Oct. 26, 1942, ch. 623, 56 Stat. 987).

Said section 885 was made applicable to the Coast Guard by title 14, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §3a whenever the Coast Guard is operating with the Navy. Experience has shown the advantage of having such a provision applicable to the Coast Guard at all times.

Said section would in no way be affected. 81st Congress, House Report No. 557.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 488 of this title as this section.

1984—Pub. L. 98–557 substituted reference to members for reference to officers and men.
### [§2410h. Renumbered §1747]