alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### **CHAPTER 5—STATISTICAL AND COMMERCIAL INFORMATION**

Sec.
171.
Repealed.
172.
Transfer of duties of Department of Labor; special investigations.
173, 174.
Repealed.
175.
Additional duties of Bureau.
176.
Collection of commercial statistics.
176a.
Confidential nature of information furnished Bureau.
176b, 177.
Repealed.
178.
Collection of statistics of foreign and interstate commerce and transportation.
179 to 181. Repealed.
182.
Statistics of manufactures.
183.
Report of statistics.
184 to 187. Repealed.
188.
Publication of commercial information.
189, 189a.
Repealed.
190.
Discussions in commercial reports of partisan questions.
191.
Terms of measure, weight, and money in commercial reports.
192 to 195. Repealed or Omitted.
196.
Payments for rent of offices in foreign countries.
197 to 198. Repealed.
CJ 

CJ 

CJ 

CJ 

1111 

1111 

2023 RMA Crops' Indemnities

Source: USDA Risk Management Agency - Summary of Business

Data Current Date: November 27, 2023

Layer Credits: USDA & US Census Bureau

 The information displayed in this map is intended to serve as an aid in displaying data provided or stored by the Risk Management Agency. It does not modify, replace or supersede any USDA published policy provisions or procedures.

Map Projection: USA Contiguous Albers Equal Area Conic

Map Creation Date: December 05, 2023

Maps created by USDA Risk Management Agency are for spatial and visual context for depicting the basic information for “where”. Maps are not considered a survey. General Reference Only.

RMA Risk Management Services Division

 -- Public Information --

This map depicts weekly crop insurance indemnity data by county as of the data current date denoted on the map

No Indemnity ($0.00)

$0.01 - $1,000,000.00

$1,000,000.01 - $10,000,000.00

$10,000,000.01 - $25,000,000.00

$25,000,000.01 - $50,000,000.00

$50,000,000.01 - $95,880,596.00

and is published biweekly.
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Seeks Applications for Technical Assistance Grants to Preserve

Affordable Rural Rental Housing

WASHINGTON, Dec. 10, 2021 – United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Under Secretary for Rural 

Development Xochitl Torres Small today announced that USDA is accepting applications for grants to assist in 

the preservation of affordable rural rental housing.

USDA is making available up to $3 million in technical assistance grants. Grant recipients will provide services 

to Multi-Family Housing (MFH) borrowers and applicants. These services will help facilitate the transfer of 

properties financed with USDA direct loans to non-profit organizations and public housing authorities. In 

addition, the funds may be used for such costs as financial analysis, capital needs assessments, appraisals, and 

other non-construction services that required as part of the transfer application process.

USDA Rural Development encourages applications for projects that advance the recovery from the COVID-19 

pandemic, promote equitable access to USDA programs and services, and reduce the impacts of climate change 

on rural communities. For more information, visit https://www.rd.usda.gov/priority-points. 

Qualified public and private nonprofit organizations, tribal housing nonprofits, public housing authorities and 

tribally designated housing entities are eligible to apply for this technical assistance grant funding. Grant 

recipients must have experience with affordable housing development and preservation.

The deadline to submit applications is 11:59 p.m., EDT on Feb. 8, 2022. For additional information, see page 

70433 of the Dec 10, 2021, Federal Register. 

If you’d like to subscribe to USDA Rural Development updates, visit our GovDelivery subscriber page. 

###

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
#### § 310.7 Removal of spermatic cords, pizzles and preputial diverticuli.

Spermatic cords and pizzles shall be removed from all carcasses. Preputial diverticuli shall be removed from hog carcasses.
Exhibit 10.22


 


2014 AMENDMENT


 TO THE





STAMPS.COM INC. 2010 EQUITY INCENTIVE
PLAN


 


Pursuant to Section 20.2
of the Stamps.com Inc. 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), and the action of the Board of Directors of Stamps.com
Inc. (the “Company”), the Company hereby adopts this Amendment to the Plan. This Amendment is effective September 9,
2014. Capitalized terms used in this Amendment, but not defined herein, shall have the respective meanings for such terms set forth
in the Plan.


 


The Plan is amended in
the following respects only:


 


		1.	A new definition is added to Section 2 of the Plan to read as follows:



 


“2014
Plan Amendment” means the amendment to this Plan adopted by action of the Board effective September 9, 2014, increasing
the number of shares of Stock and Stock equivalents reserved and available for the grant of Awards under this Plan as set forth
in Section 3.1.


 


		2.	The first sentence of Section 3.1 of the Plan is amended to read as follows:



 


The maximum aggregate
number of shares of Stock and Stock equivalents reserved and available for the grant of Awards under this Plan is the three million
five hundred thousand (3,500,000) shares originally set forth in this Plan plus an additional two million one hundred thousand
(2,100,000) shares added by the 2014 Plan Amendment, in each case calculated in accordance with Section 3.2.


 


		3.	Section 21.2A is added to the Plan to read as follows:



 


21.2A. Stockholder
Approval of 2014 Plan Amendment. The 2014 Plan Amendment is subject to approval by the stockholders of the Company within twelve
(12) months after the effective date of the 2014 Plan Amendment. No Awards of Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units may be
granted (or any other issuances of shares of Stock made) with respect to the shares of Stock added to the Plan by the 2014 Plan
Amendment unless and until such stockholder approval is obtained. Awards of Options and Stock Appreciation Rights may be granted
with respect to the shares of Stock added to the Plan by the 2014 Plan Amendment prior to such stockholder approval, provided that
any such Options and Stock Appreciation Rights may not be exercised or become exercisable unless and until such stockholder approval
is obtained. Such stockholder approval shall be obtained in the manner and to the degree required under Applicable Laws.


 


Executed on September
9, 2014, at El Segundo, California.


 


STAMPS.COM INC.


 


By:                                                                              


 


Title:
### Part A—Coronavirus Economic Stabilization
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 1 7
- 1911

NING SHEN , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,

v. SECRETARY , UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS , Defendant

– Appellee

.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg

. Gina M. Groh , Chief District Judge. ( 3:16

- cv
- 00001

- GMG )

Submitted : May 02 , 201 8 Decided: July 9, 2018

Before KEENAN , WYNN , and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion

.
Dallas Ian Hammer, ZUCKERMAN LAW, Tysons Corner, Virginia, for Appellant. William J. Powell, United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, Erin K. Reisenweber, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Dr. Ning Shen appeals the district court’s order dismiss ing her action against the Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Martinsburg, West Virginia

. We have reviewed the record, as well as the parties’ briefing in this matter, and find no reversible error. See
Hux v. Ci ty of Newport News , 451 F.3d 311, 315 (4th Cir. 2006) (a plaintiff’s failure to demonstrate a genuine issue of material fact regarding pretext warrants summary judgment)

. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court

. We dispense with
oral ar gument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
#### § 590.220 Information and assistance to be furnished to inspectors.

When inspection service is performed at any plant, the plant operator shall furnish the inspector such information and assistance as may be required for the performance of inspection functions, preparing certificates, reports, and for other official duties.
Exhibit 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Marshall Holdings International, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2008, I, W. Jamie Plante, Chief Financial Officer of Marshall Holdings  International, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:
 
 1.           Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.           The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Marshall Holdings International, Inc.
 
 Dated: December 4, 2008.
 
 /s/ W. Jamie PlanteW. Jamie Plante, Chief Financial Officer ofMarshall Holdings International, Inc.
1

The Honorable Nancy C. Dreher, United States Bankruptcy Judge

for the District of Minnesota.

 2The Honorable Michael James Davis, United States District

Judge for the District of Minnesota.

___________

No. 95-3377

___________

In re: Sharon N. Gunberg, *

*

Debtor. *

_______________________________ *

*

Minneapolis Community * Appeal from the United States

Development Agency, * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

Appellee, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

v. *

* Sharon N. Gunberg, ** Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: June 14, 1996

 Filed: August 15, 1996 ___________

Before BOWMAN, JOHN R. GIBSON, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Sharon N. Gunberg sought relief under the Bankruptcy Laws.

The Minneapolis Community Development Agency filed a complaint

objecting to Gunberg's discharge. In the ensuing adversary

proceeding, the Bankruptcy Court1 denied Gunberg's discharge.

Gunberg appealed to the District Court,2 which affirmed the

judgment of the Bankruptcy Court. Gunberg now appeals to this
-2-

Court, arguing that the Bankruptcy Court erred in several respects

and that the decision of the District Court should be reversed.

Having considered all of Gunberg's arguments, we conclude that

the Bankruptcy Court committed no error of law, that the District

Court's decision affirming the Bankruptcy Court is correct, and

that an opinion by this Court would lack precedential value.

Accordingly, the decision of the District Court is affirmed without

further discussion.

AFFIRMED. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### § 91.5 Identification of livestock intended for export.

Livestock that are intended for export must be identified in a manner that allows individual animals to be correlated to the animals listed in the export health certificate. If the importing country requires a specific or an additional form of identification, the livestock must also bear that form of identification.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0432)
### SUBCHAPTER IV—ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS
#### § 6.151 Program accessibility: New construction and alterations.

Each building or part of a building that is constucted or altered by, on behalf of, or for the use of the Commission shall be designed, constructed, or altered so as to be readily accessible to and usable by handicapped persons. The definitions, requirements, and standards of the Architectural Barriers Act, 42 U.S.C. 4151-4157, as established in 41 CFR 101-19.600 to 101-19.607, apply to buildings covered by this section.
# C_2012138EN.01003003.xml

| 12.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/30

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 17 March 2011 — AP v Court of Justice

(Case F-107/10)

(Civil service - Delay - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2012/C 138/66)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: AP (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: B. Cortese and C. Cortese, lawyers)

Defendant: Court of Justice

Re:

Application for the annulment of the decision of the appointing authority of the Court of Justice which, although granting the applicant the entitlement to household allowance from 1 July 2009, only makes the applicant eligible for that allowance from 1 November 2009 and, secondarily, application for damages.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | AP shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

AP shall bear its own costs.

---
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Seeks Applications to Improve Health Care in the Delta Region

WASHINGTON, May 13, 2022 – U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Rural Development Under 

Secretary Xochitl Torres Small today announced that USDA is accepting applications for grants to improve 

health care for people facing persistent poverty in the Delta region.

USDA is making up to $3 million in grants available through the Delta Health Care Services Grant Program. 

The program is a collaborative effort among health care professionals, institutions of higher education, research 

centers and other entities.

The funding may be used to support activities such as health education programs, health care services, job 

training in health care fields, and developing or expanding public health facilities. To qualify for a grant, 

applicants must be a consortium of regional institutions of higher education, academic health and research 

institutes, and/or economic development entities located within the Delta Region.

The Delta Region is defined as 252 counties and parishes in Alabama, Arkansas, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, 

Mississippi, Missouri, and Tennessee. 

USDA is offering priority points to projects that advance key priorities under the Biden-Harris Administration 

to help communities recover from the COVID-19 pandemic, advance equity, and combat climate change. These 

extra points will increase the likelihood of funding for projects that will advance these key priorities in rural 

America.

The minimum grant award is $50,000. The maximum award is $1 million. Grants will be awarded on a 

competitive basis.

Applications must be submitted electronically by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time July 12, 2022, through Grants.gov.

For additional information, see page 29273 of the May 13, 2022, Federal Register. 

If you’d like to subscribe to USDA Rural Development updates, visit our GovDelivery subscriber page.

###

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender
# C_2010113EN.01002902.xml

| 1.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/29

---

Action brought on 23 February 2010 — European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-100/10)

2010/C 113/46

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: G. Braun and J. Sénéchal, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts, amending Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC and repealing Council Directive 84/253/EEC (1) or, in any event, by failing to communicate those measures to the Commission, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 53 of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2006 on statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts, amending Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC and repealing Council Directive 84/253/EEC (1) or, in any event, by failing to communicate those measures to the Commission, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 53 of that directive;

1

| — | order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for the transposition of Directive 2006/43/EC lapsed on 28 June 2008. At the date the present action was commenced, the defendant had not yet adopted all the measures necessary to transpose the directive or, in any event, had not informed the Commission of those measures.

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 157, p. 87.

1

---
A district court may grant a post-conviction motion to

withdraw a guilty plea in order to "correct manifest injustice." NRS 176.165; see also Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59-60 (1985); Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984); Rubio v. State, 124 Nev. 1032, 1039-40, 194 P.3d 1224, 1228-29 (2008). Here, the district court found that Vega-Reynoso was informed that his guilty plea and conviction "will likely have adverse effects" and "would likely result in deportation," and determined that Vega-Reynoso failed to demonstrate that he was entitled to the withdrawal of his guilty plea based on a manifest injustice. Most importantly, the district court found that Vega-Reynoso "has not presented any evidence, by affidavit or otherwise, that he was not aware of the consequences of his guilty plea on his immigration status." Additionally, the district court determined that Vega-Reynoso's delay in filing his motion, and the subsequent loss of evidence, "will prejudice the State, which is no longer in a position to prosecute Defendant." We conclude that Vega-Reynoso failed to demonstrate that his plea was invalid, see Rubio, 124 Nev. at 1039-40, 194 P.3d at 1228-29, and the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying his motion, see Bryant v. State, 102 Nev. 268, 272, 721 P.2d 364, 368 (1986). Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 2

### cc: Hon. Janet J. Berry, District Judge Ian E. Silverberg Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 

### 3
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender.

STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Seeks Applications for Rural Economic Development Grants 

 WASHINGTON, July 24, 2019 – Acting Assistant to the Secretary for Rural Development Joel Baxley today 

announced that USDA is seeking applications for grants to promote rural economic development and job 

creation projects. 

 The grants are being provided through USDA’s Rural Economic Development Loan and Grant Program.

Eligible applicants include any entity that USDA Rural Development identifies as an eligible borrower under 

the Rural Electrification Act of 1936.

 The grants can be used for business startup costs; business expansion; business incubators; technical 

assistance feasibility studies; advanced telecommunications services and computer networks for medical, 

educational, and job training services; and community facilities projects for economic development. 

 USDA encourages applications that will support recommendations made in the Report to the President of the 

United States from the Task Force on Agriculture and Rural Prosperity (PDF, 5.4 MB) to help improve life in 

rural America. 

 Applicants are encouraged to consider projects that provide measurable results in helping rural communities 

build robust and sustainable economies through strategic investments in infrastructure, partnerships and 

innovation. Key strategies include:

• Achieving e-Connectivity for Rural America

• Developing the Rural Economy

• Harnessing Technological Innovation

• Supporting a Rural Workforce

• Improving Quality of Life 

 Application deadlines are First Quarter, Sept. 30, 2019; Second Quarter, Dec. 31, 2019; Third Quarter, March 

31, 2020; and Fourth Quarter, June 30, 2020. Applications are due by 4:30 p.m. local time at the Rural 

Development state office where the project will be located. For a list of offices, visit the state office website.

 See page 34333 of the July 18, 2019, Federal Register for additional information.

#
## ELECTRONIC RECORD 

# U7?-/5" 

# OM-IS 0%2-tS COA # 02-13-00247-CR OFFENSE: 29.03 

## STYLE: Charles Campv. TheStateofTexas COUNTY: Tarrant COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED TRIAL COURT: 297th District Court DATE: 12/11/14 Publish: NO TC CASE #: 1324667R

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 

# 07W5 ©tiwr STYLE: Charles Camp v. The State ofTexas 

# PRO SE- Petition FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: 

# DATE: Q^l^lp4?JJJUDGE: 

# A ^ WstsU^Z***- CCA#: 

### CCADisposition: DATE: JUDGE: SIGNED: PC: PUBLISH: DNP:

MOTION FOR REHEARING IN CCA IS: JUDGE: ELECTRONIC RECORD