alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2007099EN.01000701.xml

| 3.5.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 99/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.5.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 99/7

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

3,82 % on 1 May 2007

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

2 May 2007

(2007/C 99/10)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3588 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 163,28 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4523 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68210 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1650 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6518 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 86,91 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1265 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5826 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,127 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 246,83 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6987 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,7689 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,3266 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 33,662 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8450 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6450 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5096 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,6260 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8398 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0730 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 263,75 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,5689 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,4681 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3555 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 327,71 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6498 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 64,788 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,9870 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,374 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3588

JPY

Japanese yen

163,28

DKK

Danish krone

7,4523

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68210

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1650

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6518

ISK

Iceland króna

86,91

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1265

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5826

CZK

Czech koruna

28,127

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

246,83

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6987

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,7689

RON

Romanian leu

3,3266

SKK

Slovak koruna

33,662

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8450

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6450

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5096

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,6260

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8398

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0730

KRW

South Korean won

1 263,75

ZAR

South African rand

9,5689

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,4681

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3555

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 327,71

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6498

PHP

Philippine peso

64,788

RUB

Russian rouble

34,9870

THB

Thai baht

44,374

---

(1)

1

Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

2

Source:

---
#### Charlotte Prewoznik, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Stanley A. Durka, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 70-265;

Second District

September 17, 1971.

Stanley A. Durka, of Watseka, for appellant.

James J. Reagan, of Northbrook, for appellee.

Opinion by

Mr. JUSTICE GUILD.
Limited Power of Attorney - Securities Law Compliance


The undersigned, as a director of Solectron Corporation,
(the "Corporation"), hereby constitutes and appoints Philip Fok,
Michael Grady, or Victoria Miranda the undersigned's true and lawful
attorney-in-fact and agent to complete and execute such Forms 3, 4
and 5 and other forms as such attorney-in-fact shall, in his or her
discretion, determine to be required or advisable pursuant to Section
16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (as amended) and the
rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, or any successor laws and
regulations, as a consequence of the undersigned's ownership,
acquisition or disposition of securities of the Corporation, and to
do all acts necessary in order to file such forms with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, any securities exchange or national
association, the Corporation and such other person or agency as the
attorney-in-fact shall deem appropriate. The undersigned hereby
ratifies and confirms all that said attorney-in-fact and agent shall
do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.


This Limited Power of Attorney is executed at San Jose, California,
as of the date set forth below.



			Signature:	S/ Charles A. Dickinson

			Type or Print Name:	Charles A. Dickinson

			Dated: 	March 12, 2003






Witness:

Signature:	S/ Nitaya Yamamoto


Type or Print Name:	Nitaya Yamamoto


Dated: March 12, 2003
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on January 26, 2011, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Green Seal, Inc. (“Green Seal”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization is: Green Seal, Inc., Washington, DC. The nature and scope of Green Seal's standards development activities are: Green Seal's standards focus on significant opportunities to reduce a product, service, or organization's life cycle impact. The categories Green Seal covers with its standards includes building and construction products, cleaning products and services, companies, hotels and lodging, lighting products, paints and coatings, paper products, personal care products and service, restaurants and food services, and vehicles and vehicle maintenance.

Patricia A. Brink,

Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2011-4923 Filed 3-4-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE M
July 

### 18,2011 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Department ofHealth and Human Services Attention: CMS-1436-P P.O. Box 8013 Baltimore, Maryland 21244-8013 Dear SirlMadam: The American Association for Clinical Chemistly (AACC) welcomes the opportunityto comment onthe Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) June 30,2011 proposed rule, which would "retract" the policy set forth in the November 29,2011 Physician Fee Schedule (PFS) final rule requiring clinical laboratories to obtain the signature ofa physician orqualified non-physician practitioneron a requisition form to getreimbursed underMedicare. Iffinalized, the agency would return to its earlierpolicy, whereby a signed requisition form was only one ofa number ofoptions available to cIinicallaboratories for documenting the order. As CMS details inthe proposed rule, requiring a signed requisition form could:

• Negatively impactbeneficiary access to care; • Create unnecessary confusion among health care providers; • Inconvenience physicians and patients alike; and • Increase the administrative burden on many clinical laboratories. AACC shares CMS's opinion. We agree with the agency's decision to return tothe 2001 policy developed through negotiated rulemaking, which stated that a physician signature is not required for Medicare reimbursement. AACC looks forward toworking with CMS as it finalizes this rule. By way ofbackground, AACC is the principal association ofprofessional laboratory scientists--including MDs, PhDs and medical technologists. AACC'smembers develop and use chemical concepts, procedures, techniques and instrumentation in health-related investigations and work in hospitals, independent laboratories and the diagnostics industry worldwide. The AACC provides international leadership in advancing thepractice and profession ofclinical laboratory science and its application to health care. Ifyou have any questions, please call me at(314) 362-0194, orVince Stine, PhD, Director, Government Affairs, at(202) 835-8721. Sincerely,

# +-~~~ Ann M. Gronowski, PhD President, AACC
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Alliance Laundry Systems LLC, Alliance Laundry Corporation and Alliance Laundry Holdings LLC (the Companies) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Bruce P. Rounds, Vice President Chief Financial Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|/s/ BRUCE P. ROUNDS                   
|Vice President Chief Financial Officer

November 9, 2009
128 STAT. 2074 PUBLIC LAW 113–207—DEC. 16, 2014 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 1391: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 160 (2014): 

June 17, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 3, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 113–207 

113th Congress 

An Act 

Designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 25 South 

Oak Street in London, Ohio, as the ‘‘London Fallen Veterans Memorial Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. LONDON FALLEN VETERANS MEMORIAL POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 25 South Oak Street in London, Ohio, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘London Fallen Veterans Memorial 

Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘London Fallen Veterans Memorial Post Office’’. 

Approved December 16, 2014. 

Dec. 16, 2014 

[H.R. 1391] 


srobinson on DSKB307YQ1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
#### § 1304.406 Removal of unauthorized, unsafe, and derelict structures or facilities.

If, at any time, any dock, wharf, boathouse (fixed or floating), floating cabin, outfall, aerial cable or other fixed or floating structure or facility (including any navigable boat or vessel that has become deteriorated or is a potential navigation hazard or impediment to flood control) is anchored, installed, constructed or moored in a manner inconsistent with this part, or is not constructed in accordance with TVA's approval or plans approved by TVA, or is not maintained or operated so as to remain in accordance with this part and such approval or plans, or is not kept in a good state of repair and in good, safe and substantial condition, and the owner or operator thereof fails to repair or remove such structure (or operate or maintain it in accordance with such approval or plans) within ninety (90) days after written notice from TVA to do so, TVA may cancel any license, permit, or approval and remove such structure, and/or cause it to be removed, from the Tennessee River system and/or lands in the custody and control of TVA. Such written notice may be given by mailing a copy thereof to the owner's address as listed on the license, permit, or approval or by posting a copy on the structure or facility. TVA may remove or cause to be removed any such structure or facility anchored, installed, constructed, or moored without such license, permit, or approval, whether such license or approval has once been obtained and subsequently canceled, or whether it has never been obtained. TVA's removal costs shall be charged to the owner of the structure, and payment of such costs shall be a condition of approval for any future facility proposed to serve the tract of land at issue or any tract derived therefrom whether or not the current owner caused such charges to be incurred. In addition, any applicant with an outstanding removal charge payable to TVA shall, until such time as the charge be paid in full, be ineligible to receive a permit or approval from TVA for any facility located anywhere along or in the Tennessee River or its tributaries. TVA shall not be responsible for the loss of property associated with the removal of any such structure or facility including, without limitation, the loss of any navigable boat or vessel moored at such a facility. Any costs voluntarily incurred by TVA to protect and store such property shall be removal costs within the meaning of this section, and TVA may sell such property and apply the proceeds toward any and all of its removal costs. Small businesses seeking expedited consideration of the economic impact of actions under this section may contact TVA's Supplier and Diverse Business Relations staff, TVA Procurement, 1101 Market Street, Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402-2801.

[68 FR 46936, Aug. 7, 2003, as amended at 83 FR 44474, Aug. 31, 2018; 86 FR 50636, Sept. 10, 2021]
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 48 (Friday, March 11, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 13443]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5576]

[[Page 13443]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration 12481 and 12482]

Connecticut Disaster CT-00019

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Connecticut (FEMA-
1958-DR), dated 03/03/2011.
    Incident: Snowstorm.
    Incident Period: 01/11/2011 through 01/12/2011.
    Effective Date: 03/03/2011.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/02/2011.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 12/05/2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 03/03/2011, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Fairfield, Hartford, Litchfield, New Haven, New 
London, Tolland, and the Tribal Lands of the Mashantucket Pequot and 
the Mohegan Tribal Nations located entirely within New London County.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
    Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere.      3.250
    Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available              3.000
     Elsewhere...............................................
For Economic Injury:
    Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available              3.000
     Elsewhere...............................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 12481B 
and for economic injury is 12482B.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011-5576 Filed 3-10-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
```
#### § 557.3 No fish or fish product to be imported without compliance with applicable regulations.

No fish or fish product offered for importation from any foreign country shall be admitted into the United States if it is adulterated or misbranded or does not comply with all the requirements of this subchapter that would apply to it if it were a domestic product.
#### § 381.7 Coverage of all poultry and poultry products processed in official establishments.

All poultry and poultry products processed in an official establishment shall be inspected, handled, processed, marked, and labeled as required by the regulations.
#### Alan E. Varley *v.*Nina B. Varley

*Henry D. Marcus,*in support of the motion.

Submitted January 25

decided March 5, 1974

The defendant’s “Motion for Beview of Decision Concerning Amendment of Draft Finding and Eequest for Finding and Eefusing in Advance any Motions to Correct Finding (Bectification)” dated January 14, 1974, in the appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County is granted and the relief sought therein is denied.

The defendant’s “Amended Motion to Beview of Decision Concerning all Amendments of Draft Finding and Eequest for Finding and Eefusing in Advance Any Motions to Correct Finding (Bectification)” dated January 15,1974, in the appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County is dismissed.

*Nina B. Varley,*pro se, in support of the motion.

Submitted January 25—decided Match 5, 1974

The defendant’s “Motion for Beview Decision Concerning Withdrawal (Disqualification) of Eeferee in Future Motions or Petitions, Alimony Pendente Lite and Counsel Fees during Appeal, Contempt, also Directing a Eeferee to Hear Motion for Disclosure and Production” dated January 21, 1974, in the appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County is dismissed.

*Nina B. Varley,*pro se, in support of the motion.

Submitted February 1—decided March 5, 1974
#### § 95.31 Animal manure.

Manure of horses, cattle, sheep, other ruminants, and swine shall not be imported except upon permission from the Deputy Administrator, Veterinary Services. Importations permitted shall be subject to such restrictions as he may deem necessary in each instance: *Provided, however,* That manure produced by animals while in transit to the United States shall be subject only to the requirements of the Department regulations governing the importation of domestic livestock and other animals.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0015)

[28 FR 5981, June 13, 1963, as amended at 59 FR 67134, Dec. 29, 1994. Redesignated at 78 FR 73003, Dec. 4, 2013]
Editorial Note on Part 28
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear at 76 FR 76873, Dec. 9, 2011.

§ 28.60 Briefs. ( a ) *Length.* Principal briefs shall not exceed 60 pages and reply briefs 30 pages, exclusive of tables and pages limited only to quotations of statutes, rules, and the like. Motions to file extended briefs shall be granted only for good cause shown. Briefs in excess of 10 pages shall include an index and a table of authorities.
( b ) *Format.* Every brief must be easily readable. Pages must be 81 ⁄ 2 × 11 inches with margins at least one inch on all sides. Typewritten briefs must have double spacing between each line of text, except for quoted texts which may be single spaced.
( c ) *Number of copies.* An original and 3 copies of each brief shall be filed with the administrative judge and one copy served on each party separately represented. When an action is before the full Board, an original and seven copies of each brief must be filed with the Board and one copy served on each party separately represented.
**Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 November 2011 – Saupiquet v Commission**

**(Case T-131/10)**

Customs duty – Repayment of import duties – Canned tuna originating in Thailand – Tariff quota – Opening date – Sunday – Exhaustion of quota – Article 239 of the Community Customs Code – Articles 308a to 308c of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 – Regulation (EC) No 975/2003

1.                     *Own resources of the European Union – Customs destinations – Release for free circulation – Tariff quota management – Tariff
quota opening on a Sunday, closing day of the customs offices in a Member State, and exhausted the same day – Exclusion from
the tariff quota thus exhausted, of an operator established in that Member State – Lawfulness (Council Regulation No 2913/92,
as amended by Regulation No 2700/2000, Art. 239; Commission Regulation No 2454/93, as amended by Regulation No 214/2007, Arts
308a to 308c) (see paras 27-28)*

2.                     *Own resources of the European Union – Customs destinations – Release for free circulation – Tariff quota management – Exclusion
of an EU importer from a tariff quota opened on a Sunday, by reason of the Sunday closing of customs offices in the Member
State of that importer – Infringement by the Commission of the obligation to make necessary legislative provisions to ensure
equal and non-discriminatory access to the tariff quota – None (Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Arts
20 and 21; Council Regulations No 2913/92, as amended by Regulation No 2700/2000, Arts 247 and 247a, and No 975/2003, Art.
7; Commission Regulation No 2454/93, as amended by Regulation No 214/2007, Arts 308a to 308c) (see paras 30-32, 35-38, 43-45)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | APPLICATION for annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 10005 final of 16 December 2009 finding no justification for repayment to the applicant of import duties on cans of tuna originating in Thailand. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders Saupiquet to pay the costs. |
2019 Livestock Reinsurance Data 

National Totals 

As of 10/2023 

Gross Liability Gross Premium Gross Indemnity Retained Liability Retained Premium Retained Ind

6,126,717,063 101,279,371 78,773,675 2,303,072,279 37,747,288 29,6

Footnote: Amounts shown are for policies that have reached the Premium Billing Date according to the actuarial documents. 

Page 1 of 1