alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 1316.3 Anti-kickback procedures.

When so indicated in TVA contract documents or actions, the following clause is included by reference in such documents or actions:

# Anti-Kickback Procedures

Contractor shall comply with the following:

(a) *Definitions.* As used in this clause, terms shall have the meanings defined in the Anti-Kickback Act of 1986 (41 U.S.C. 51-58) (the Act).

(b) The Act prohibits any person from—

(1) Providing or attempting to provide or offering to provide any kickback;

(2) Soliciting, accepting, or attempting to accept any kickback; or

(3) Including, directly or indirectly, the amount of any kickback in the contract price charged by a prime contractor to TVA or in the contract price charged by the subcontractor to a prime contractor or higher tier subcontractor.

(c)(1) Contractor shall have in place and follow reasonable procedures designed to prevent and detect possible violations described in section (b) of this clause in its own operations and direct business relationships.

(2) When Contractor has reasonable grounds to believe that a violation described in section (b) of this clause may have occurred, Contractor shall promptly report in writing the possible violation. Such reports shall be made to the TVA Inspector General.

(3) Contractor shall cooperate fully with TVA or any other Federal agency investigating a possible violation described in section (b) of this clause.

(4) (i) Regardless of the contract tier at which a kickback was provided, accepted, or charged under the contract in violation of section (b) of this clause, the Contracting Officer may—

(A) Offset the amount of the kickback against any monies owed by TVA under this contract; and/or

(B) Direct that Contractor withhold from sums owed the subcontractor the amount of the kickback.

(ii) The Contracting Officer may order that monies withheld under subsection (c)(4)(i)(B) of this clause be paid over to TVA unless TVA has already offset those monies under subsection (c)(4)(i)(A) of this clause. In the latter case, Contracting shall notify the Contracting Officer when the monies are withheld.

(5) Contractor agrees to incorporate the substance of this clause, including this subsection (c)(5), in all subcontracts under this contract.

(End of clause)
### §294. Importation or transportation of falsely marked gold or silver ware prohibited

It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, corporation, or association, being a manufacturer of or wholesale or retail dealer in gold or silver jewelry or gold ware, silver goods or silverware, or for any officer, manager, director, or agent of such firm, corporation, or association to import or export or cause to be imported into or exported from the United States for the purpose of selling or disposing of the same, or to deposit or cause to be deposited in the United States mails for transmission thereby, or to deliver or cause to be delivered to any common carrier for transportation from one State, Territory, or possession of the United States, or the District of Columbia, to any other State, Territory, or possession of the United States, or to said District, in interstate commerce, or to transport or cause to be transported from one State, Territory, or possession of the United States, or from the District of Columbia, to any other State, Territory, or possession of the United States, or to said District, in interstate commerce, any article of merchandise manufactured after June 13, 1907, and made in whole or in part of gold or silver, or any alloy of either of said metals, and having stamped, branded, engraved, or printed thereon, or upon any tag, card, or label attached thereto, or upon any box, package, cover, or wrapper in which said article is incased or inclosed, any mark or word indicating or designed or intended to indicate that the gold or silver or alloy of either of said metals in such article is of a greater degree of fineness than the actual fineness or quality of such gold, silver, or alloy, according to the standards and subject to the qualifications set forth in sections 295 and 296 of this title.

(June 13, 1906, ch. 3289, §1, 34 Stat. 260.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title of 1976 Amendment

Pub. L. 94–450, §1, Oct. 1, 1976, 90 Stat. 1501, provided: "That this Act [amending section 295 of this title and enacting provisions set out as a note under section 295 of this title] may be cited as the 'Gold Labeling Act of 1976'."

#### Short Title

Act June 13, 1906, ch. 3289, which enacted this section and sections 295 to 300 of this title, is popularly known as the "Jewelers' Liability Act (Gold and Silver Articles)" and also as the "National Gold and Silver Stamping Act of 1906".
Exhibit 32.2

                    PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection  with this Annual Report of Frontline Ltd. (the "Company") on Form
20-F for the annual period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Tom E. Jebsen,  the  Principal  Financial  Officer of the  Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be  retained  by the  Company  and  furnished  to the SEC or its staff upon
request.

Date: June 30, 2004

/s/ Tom E. Jebsen
-----------------
Principal Executive Officer
#### § 81.6 Federal preemption of State and local laws and regulations with respect to CWD.

State and local laws and regulations on farmed or captive deer, elk, or moose with respect to CWD that are more restrictive than the regulations in this part are not preempted by this part, except as described in § 81.5.
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Rural Development Finalizes Loan for Nevada Biorefinery

Storey County Facility Expected to Create Nearly 70 Jobs

WASHINGTON, Dec. 19, 2017 – Assistant to the Secretary for Rural Development Anne Hazlett today 

announced that USDA recently finalized a $112.6 million loan guarantee through the Jefferson Financial 

Federal Credit Union to help support the construction of a biorefinery in Storey County, Nev.

Ryze Renewables Reno, LLC will use the funds to convert distiller’s corn oil from ethanol plants into 

renewable diesel fuel. The plant is expected to create almost 70 jobs. It is scheduled to open in the second 

quarter of 2019.

Jefferson Financial Federal Credit Union, based in Metarie, La., is part of a consortium of credit unions that 

pool resources to fund projects. By distributing portions of the loans, consortium members are able to leverage 

each other’s balance sheets to fund projects. The loan will be serviced by the Greater Nevada Credit Union.

The loan is the largest to date in USDA Rural Development’s Biorefinery, Renewable Chemical and Biobased 

Product Manufacturing Assistance Program. The program assists in the development, construction and 

retrofitting of new and emerging technologies for advanced biofuels, renewable chemicals and biobased 

products.

#

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6727

JONATHAN RANDALL FRIZZELLE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

HALIFAX COUNTY JAIL; SHERIFF EUGENE SHORTT;

NURSE CARLTON GRAVES; DOCTOR MITCHELL,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District

Judge. (CA-95-1190-R)

Submitted: September 5, 1996 Decided: September 17, 1996

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jonathan Randall Frizzelle, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Timothy

Williams, WILLIAMS, STILWELL, MORRISON & GRIMES, Danville, Virginia; Jason Robert Davis, HEILIG, MCKENRY, FRAIM & LOLLAR, Norfolk,

Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Frizzelle v. Halifax County Jail, No. CA-95-1190-R (W.D. Va.

Apr. 23, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 49 (Monday, March 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13619-13620]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5632]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA), Initial 
Review

    The meeting announced below concerns The Institutional 
Collaboration between the Institute Pasteur of Madagascar and the 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on Malaria and Vector-Borne 
Diseases Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) GH11-003, and Research 
Activities in Support of Malaria Prevention and Control in the Republic 
of Uganda as Part of the President's Malaria Initiative, FOA GH11-004, 
initial review.
    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting:

    Time and Date: 12 p.m.-3 p.m., May 19, 2011 (Closed).
    Place: Teleconference.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance 
with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 
U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis 
and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters To Be Discussed: The meeting will include the initial 
review, discussion, and evaluation of applications received in 
response to ``Institutional Collaboration between the Institute 
Pasteur of Madagascar and the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention on Malaria and Vector-Borne Diseases, FOA GH11-003, and 
Research Activities in Support of Malaria Prevention and Control in 
the Republic of Uganda as Part of the President's Malaria 
Initiative, FOA GH11-004, initial review.''
    Contact Person for More Information: Sheree Marshall-Williams, 
PhD, Scientific Review Officer, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., 
Mailstop D72, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, Telephone: (404) 639-7742.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the

[[Page 13620]]

authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the 
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: March 4, 2011.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2011-5632 Filed 3-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  MAY-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                          $        16
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                         1,547
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          0
<PP&E>                                    0
<DEPRECIATION>                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        1,563
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    40
<BONDS>                               1,523
<COMMON>                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          1,563
<SALES>                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          0
<CGS>                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           0
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                              0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                          0.00
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6909

BERNARD ENGRAM,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

STEVEN J. GAL, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (CA01-4309-3)

Submitted: October 24, 2002 Decided: October 30, 2002

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bernard Engram, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Bernard Engram, a federal prisoner, appeals the district

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge

and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241

(2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Engram v. Gal, No. CA-01-4309-3 (D.S.C. May 20, 2002). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### **CHAPTER 108—STATE-BASED INSURANCE REFORM**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—NONADMITTED INSURANCE

Sec.
8201.
Reporting, payment, and allocation of premium taxes.
8202.
Regulation of nonadmitted insurance by insured's home State.
8203.
Participation in national producer database.
8204.
Uniform standards for surplus lines eligibility.
8205.
Streamlined application for commercial purchasers.
8206.
Definitions.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—REINSURANCE

8221.
Regulation of credit for reinsurance and reinsurance agreements.
8222.
Regulation of reinsurer solvency.
8223.
Definitions.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—RULE OF CONSTRUCTION

8231.
Rule of construction.
8232.
Severability.
### §279. Absence of Director

In the case of the absence of the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology the Secretary of Commerce may designate some officer of said Institute to perform the duties of the director during his absence.

(Mar. 4, 1911, ch. 237, §1, 36 Stat. 1231; Mar. 4, 1913, ch. 141, §1, 37 Stat. 736; Pub. L. 100–418, title V, §5115(c), Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1433.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Act which comprises this chapter.

#### Amendments

1988—Pub. L. 100–418 substituted "National Institute of Standards and Technology" for "Bureau of Standards" and "Institute" for "bureau".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Act Mar. 4, 1913, substituted "Secretary of Commerce" for "Secretary of Commerce and Labor".
# C_2010328EN.01003402.xml

| 4.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/34

---

Action brought on 24 September 2010 — Mahmoudian v Council

(Case T-440/10)

()

2010/C 328/59

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Fereydoun Mahmoudian (Tehran, Iran) (represented by: A. Kronshagen, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul point 2 of Section I A of the annex to Council Regulation (EU) No 668/2010 concerning restrictive measures against Iran, and the Council's decision of 26 July 2010 in so far as it concerns the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul point 2 of Section I A of the annex to Council Regulation (EU) No 668/2010 concerning restrictive measures against Iran, and the Council's decision of 26 July 2010 in so far as it concerns the applicant;

| — | order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant seeks annulment of Council implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2010 implementing Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 423/2007, (1) and Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP, (2) concerning restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation, in so far as the applicant's name has been placed on the list of persons, entities and bodies whose funds and economic resources are frozen pursuant to that provision.

1

2

The pleas in law and arguments raised by the applicant are identical to those raised in Case T-439/10 Fulmen v Council, concerning the company of which the applicant is the managing director.

Fulmen

Council

---

(1)  Council implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2010 of 26 July 2010 implementing Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2010 L 195, p. 25).

1

(2)  Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP of 26 July 2010 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Common Position 2007/140/CFSP (OJ 2010 L 195, p. 39).

2

---
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Releases Report on Investment Needs for Rural Rental Housing 

Report Cites Need for $5.6 Billion in Additional Investments to Preserve Affordable 

Multi-Family Housing in Rural America 

(August 3, 2016) – Rural Development Under Secretary Lisa Mensah today released a report that 

outlines the costs to maintain and upgrade USDA’s inventory of multi-family housing units.

The report, The Comprehensive Property Assessment of the USDA Rural Development Multi-Family 

Housing Portfolio, says that over the next 20 years, properties in USDA’s Multi-Family Housing 

program will need an additional $5.6 billion to address basic maintenance and modernization needs.

According to the study, $5.6 billion above current funding levels will cover basic capital 

improvements such as roofs, insulation, accessibility improvements, plumbing, and electrical and 

structural repairs to USDA-financed rental properties. The report also provides a framework for how 

USDA can more effectively collaborate with stakeholders, policymakers, partners and lawmakers to

preserve affordable housing for working families, seniors and low-income rural residents who rely on 

USDA to meet their housing needs.

The report supports the Obama administration’s Open Data Policy and Executive Order to promote 

transparency and deliver efficient services to the public. It was funded by USDA and conducted 

independently by RSM US LLP (RSM) and CoreLogic.

To learn more about USDA’s Multi-Family Housing programs and other programs to strengthen 

rural America, visit www.rd.usda.gov or contact your local USDA Rural Development State Office 

today.

#

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender.
§ 1301.69 Safeguarding classified information. ( a ) All classified information shall be afforded a level of protection against unauthorized disclosure commensurate with its level of classification.
( b ) The Executive Order and the Information Security Oversight Office implementing directive provides information on the protection of classified information. Specific controls on the use, processing, storage, reproduction, and transmittal of classified information within TVA to provide protection for such information and to prevent access by unauthorized persons are contained in internal TVA procedures.
( c ) Any person who discovers or believes that a classified document is lost or compromised shall immediately report the circumstances to their supervisor and the Senior Agency Official, who shall conduct an immediate inquiry into the matter.
# C_2012184EN.01001904.xml

| 23.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 184/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 184/19

---

Order of the General Court of 20 April 2012 — Entegris v OHIM — Optimize Technologies (OPTIMIZE TECHNOLOGIES)

(Case T-163/10) (1)

1

2012/C 184/37

Language of the case: English

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 161, 19.6.2010.

1

---
§ 9410.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) This part sets forth rules that inform the public as to what information is maintained by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission about identifiable individuals and that inform those identifiable individuals how they may gain access to and correct or amend information about them.
( b ) The regulations in this part carry out the requirements of the Privacy Act of 1974 (Pub. L. 93-579) and in particular 5 U.S.C. 552a as added by that Act.
( c ) The regulations in this part apply only to records disclosed or requested under the Privacy Act of 1974 and not to requests for information made under 5 U.S.C. 552, the Freedom of Information Act, or requests for reports and statements filed with the Election Assistance Commission which are public records and available for inspection and copying.