alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013156EN.01000301.xml

| 1.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 9 April 2013 — European Commission v Ireland

(Case C-85/11) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Taxation - Directive 2006/112/EC - Articles 9 and 11 - National legislation permitting the inclusion of non-taxable persons in a group of persons who may be regarded as a single taxable person for VAT purposes)

2013/C 156/03

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal, Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: Ireland (represented by: D. O’Hagan, Agent, assisted by G. Clohessy, SC, and N. Travers, BL)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the defendant: Czech Republic (represented by: M. Smolek and T. Müller, Agents), Kingdom of Denmark (represented: initially by C. Vang, and subsequently by V. Pasternak Jørgensen, Agents), Republic of Finland (represented by: H. Leppo and S. Hartikainen, Agents), United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented by: H. Walker, Agent, and by M. Hall, Barrister)

Interveners in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Breach of Articles 9 and 11 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1) — National legislation permitting the inclusion of non-taxable persons in a VAT group

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs;

| 3. | Orders the Czech Republic, the Kingdom of Denmark, the Republic of Finland and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to bear their own respective costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Czech Republic, the Kingdom of Denmark, the Republic of Finland and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to bear their own respective costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 145, 14.5.2011.

1

---
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-18-00439-CR

JUAN MANUEL HERRERA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 371st District Court

of Tarrant County (1510492D)

August 26, 2019

Opinion by Justice Womack

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Dana Womack

 Justice Dana Womack
### §1120. Civil liability for false or fraudulent registration

Any person who shall procure registration in the Patent and Trademark Office of a mark by a false or fraudulent declaration or representation, oral or in writing, or by any false means, shall be liable in a civil action by any person injured thereby for any damages sustained in consequence thereof.

(July 5, 1946, ch. 540, title VI, §38, 60 Stat. 440; Pub. L. 93–596, §1, Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1949.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Act Feb. 20, 1905, ch. 592, §25, 33 Stat. 730.

#### Amendments

1975—Pub. L. 93–596 substituted "Patent and Trademark Office" for "Patent Office".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1975 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 93–596 effective Jan. 2, 1975, see section 4 of Pub. L. 93–596, set out as a note under section 1111 of this title.

#### Repeal and Effect on Existing Rights

Repeal of inconsistent provisions, effect of this chapter on pending proceedings and existing registrations and rights under prior acts, see notes set out under section 1051 of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of Commerce, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of Commerce, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 5 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1263, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
```

[House Document 110-34]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

110th Congress, 1st Session - - - - - - - - - - - - House Document 110-
34

 
                     CERTIFICATION FOR AN EXPORT TO

                     THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA

                               __________

                             COMMUNICATION

                                  from

                   THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

                              transmitting

CERTIFICATION THAT THE EXPORT TO THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA OF THE 
 SPECIFIED ITEMS IS NOT DETRIMENTAL TO THE UNITED STATES SPACE LAUNCH 
 INDUSTRY, AND THAT THE MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING ANY INDIRECT 
  TECHNICAL BENEFIT THAT COULD BE DERIVED FROM SUCH EXPORTS, WILL NOT 
  MEASURABLY IMPROVE THE MISSILE OR SPACE LAUNCH CAPABILITIES OF THE 
   PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA, PURSUANT TO PUB. L. 105-261, SEC. 1512

May 16, 2007.--Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs and ordered 
                             to be printed.
To the Congress of the United States:
    In accordance with the provisions of section 1512 of the 
Strom Thurmond National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 1999 (Public Law 105-261), I hereby certify that the 
export to the People's Republic of China of the following items 
is not detrimental to the U.S. space launch industry, and that 
the material and equipment, including any indirect technical 
benefit that could be derived from such exports, will not 
measurably improve the missile or space launch capabilities of 
the People's Republic of China:
           A four-axis filament winding machine for 
        production of spare parts for China's water 
        purification and treatment industries;
           A computer control system upgrade to a 
        three-axis filament winding machine for production of 
        spare parts for China's water purification and 
        treatment industries;
           An isostatic press for manufacturing 
        automotive spare parts; and
           A four-axis filament winding machine to be 
        used in production of graphite or glass composite golf 
        clubs.

                                                    George W. Bush.
    The White House, May 15, 2007.

                                  

```
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 Written Statement of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (a)
    
    the Form 10-Q Report of the Company for
the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008
filed on the date hereof with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(b)
    
    information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ John A. StoneJohn A. StoneChief Financial Officer
WHEN YOU’RE HANGING OUT 

AT THE PARK...

Take time to talk with her about the dangers of alcohol.

Starting short, frequent conversations about drinking at an early 

age is the first step toward keeping your child safe and informed. 

For tips on how—and when—to begin the conversation, visit 

www.underagedrinking.samhsa.gov

#TalkTheyHearYou PEP20-03-01-008
#### § 540.3 Handling and disposal of condemned or other inedible materials.

Condemned or other inedible fish and fish parts shall be separated from edible fish. If not disposed of on the premises of the establishment, the condemned and inedible fish parts shall be conveyed from the official establishment for disposition at a rendering plant, an animal feed manufacturing establishment, or at another establishment for other non-food use. If not decharacterized by use of approved denaturants or colorings, the inedible materials shall be enclosed in containers that are conspicuously marked to indicate that the contents are condemned or otherwise inedible. The materials may be shipped under company or official seal to a rendering facility or for other inedible processing.
§ 416.17 Agency verification. FSIS shall verify the adequacy and effectiveness of the Sanitation SOP's and the procedures specified therein by determining that they meet the requirements of this part. Such verification may include: ( a ) Reviewing the Sanitation SOP's;
( b ) Reviewing the daily records documenting the implementation of the Sanitation SOP's and the procedures specified therein and any corrective actions taken or required to be taken;
( c ) Direct observation of the implementation of the Sanitation SOP's and the procedures specified therein and any corrective actions taken or required to be taken; and
( d ) Direct observation or testing to assess the sanitary conditions in the establishment.
### §4624. Personnel exchanges

The Secretary of Energy may authorize temporary exchanges of personnel between the national laboratories of the Department of Energy and any domestic firm or any consortium referred to in section 4622 of this title that is participating in the Initiative. The exchange of personnel shall be subject to such restrictions, limitations, terms, and conditions that the Secretary of Energy considers necessary in the interest of national security.

(Pub. L. 100–180, div. C, title I, §3144, Dec. 4, 1987, 101 Stat. 1243.)
### SUBCHAPTER II—CYBERSQUATTING PROTECTION
Exhibit






EXHIBIT 10.9
2016 Executive Compensation
On February 4, 2016, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Interactive Intelligence Group, Inc. (the "Company") approved annual compensation arrangements, for the year beginning January 1, 2016, for the Company's executive officers, including Donald E. Brown, the Company's Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer, Ashley A. Vukovits, the Company's Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President of Administration, Secretary and Treasurer, and the following other "Named Executive Officers" included in the Company's definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 15, 2015:
	
		
	Name
	Title/Position

	Gary R. Blough
	Chief International Officer

	Thomas J. Fisher
	Chief Services Officer

	Paul F. Weber
	Chief Business Officer, Senior Vice President, North American Sales




 
The information regarding the base salaries and performance bonuses for Dr. Brown, Ms. Vukovits and the other Named Executive Officers appearing in the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 10, 2016, is incorporated herein by reference.


Board of Director Compensation


The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company did not modify the annual compensation arrangements from 2015, for the period beginning January 1, 2016, for the Company’s non-employee Board of Director members. Each non-employee director will receive an annual retainer, paid quarterly, of $32,000, and directors are not paid a per meeting fee for attending Board of Director meetings. For any meeting of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (the "Committees"), members will be paid $1,500 if the meeting is attended in person and $750 if the meeting is attended by teleconference. The Audit Committee Chairman will receive an annual retainer, paid quarterly, of $15,000 and any other members of the Audit Committee will receive an annual retainer, paid quarterly, of $5,000. The Chairman of the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will each receive an annual retainer, paid quarterly, of $5,000.


In 2015, restricted stock unit ("RSU") awards were granted to each non-employee Board of Director member at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Each non-employee director received RSUs with a grant date fair value equal to $125,000, the number of which was based on the closing price on the last trading day prior to the grant date. The RSUs will vest one year after the grant date. In addition, Mitchell E. Daniels, Jr., as a new non-employee member of the Board of Directors, received RSUs with a grant date fair value equal to an additional $125,000, the number of which was based on the closing price on the last trading day prior to the grant date. The RSUs will vest in three equal annual installments and were granted on the day of his election to the Board. In 2016, each non-employee director will receive an equity award at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders in the form of either stock options or RSUs.
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1796 Prepped byKeeia Richards


### Document

Number: 

# 60 ) VI-B-1 1 Docket Number: 

# A-90-3 7

Printed 10/31/2008 4:20:37

PM Sheet 60 of 107P. 2 A-90-3 7 VI-B-1 1 Thi s documen t

ha s bee nmove dt o IV-C- 3 a t th ereques t

o f th eprojec t

officer . I t wa s incorrectl y categoriz e originally .

\
Editorial Note on Part 900
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

§ 900.41 How long must an Indian tribe or tribal organization keep management system records? The Indian tribe or tribal organization must retain financial, procurement and property records for the minimum periods described below. Electronic, magnetic or photographic records may be substituted for hard copies. ( a ) *Financial records.* Financial records include documentation of supporting costs incurred under the contract. These records must be retained for three years from the date of submission of the single audit report to the Secretary.
( b ) *Procurement records.* Procurement records include solicitations, purchase orders, contracts, payment histories and records applicable of significant decisions. These records must be retained for three years after the Indian tribe or tribal organization or subcontractors make final payment and all other pending matters are closed.
( c ) *Property management records.* Property management records of real and personal property transactions must be retained for three years from the date of disposition, replacement, or transfer.
( d ) *Litigation, audit exceptions and claims.* Records pertaining to any litigation, audit exceptions or claims requiring management systems data must be retained until the action has been completed.
The Honorable Donald E. O & Brien, United States District Judge for the Nor thern 1 District of Iowa. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-1022

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Northern District of Iowa. Kenneth A. Frazier, also known as * Kenneth A. Frazier, Sr., * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: December 12, 1997 Filed: December 24, 1997

___________ Before McMILLIAN, BEAM, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Kenneth A. Frazier appeals his 188-month sentence imposed by the distric t court, following his unconditional guilt y plea to one count of possessing with intent to 1 distrib ute methamphetamine. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v

. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and was granted leave to withdraw; Frazier did not avail himself of the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. We affirm.-2-

Frazier seeks to challenge the district court & s denial of his motion to suppress. By unconditionally pleading guilty, however, Frazier has waived his right to appeal the search and seizure issue s. See United States v. McNeely , 20 F.3d 886, 888 (8th Cir.) (per curiam) (valid guilt

y plea waives all nonjurisdictional defects and defenses), cert. denied , 513 U.S. 860 (1994). Any claim of ineffective assistance of counsel relating to his guilty plea is more appropriately resolved in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 proceeding. See United States v. Logan , 49 F.3d 352, 361 (8th Cir. 1995). Having car efully reviewed the record, we find no other nonfrivolous issue fo r appeal. See Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988). We remind counsel, however, of their obligation in filing an Anders brief. Such a brief must be done as an advocate for the appellant, not the government, and should refer to anything in the record tha t might arg uably support the appeal. See Evans v. Clarke , 868 F.2d 267, 268 (8th Cir. 1989). Accordingly, we affirm. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Together, America Prospers

Electric Infrastructure Loan & Loan Guarantee Program

What does this 

program do?

The electric program makes loans 

and loan guarantees to nonprofit 

and cooperative associations, 

public bodies, and other utilities. 

The loans and loan guarantees 

finance the construction of electric 

distribution, transmission, and 

generation facilities, including 

system improvements to improve 

electric service in rural areas, 

as well as demand side 

management, smart grid, energy 

efficiency and conservation 

programs, and on-grid and off-grid 

renewable energy systems.

Who may apply 

for this program?

Electric distribution, generation, 

and transmission providers serving 

qualified rural areas, including:

• State and local 

governmental entities

• Federally recognized Tribes

• Nonprofits including cooperatives 

and limited dividend or 

mutual associations

• For-profit businesses (must be 

a corporation or limited 

liability company)

How may funds be used? 

Funds may be used to finance:

• Maintenance

• Upgrades

• Expansion

• Replacement of distribution, sub 

transmission, and headquarters 

(service, warehouse) facilities

• Energy efficiency

• Renewable energy systems

• For additional details, see the 

Code of Federal Regulations

How do we get started?

• Applications for these programs 

are accepted year round through a 

General Field Representative (GFR)

• Program Resources are 

available online (i.e., forms, 

guidance, certifications)

Who can answer questions?

• Contact the GFR who serves 

your area

• Call the Rural Electric Program at 

(202) 720-0848

What governs this program?

• Rural Electrification Act of 1936, 

as amended

• Code of Federal Regulations

NOTE: Because citations and other information may be subject to change, 

please always consult the program instructions listed in the section above 

titled “What Governs This Program?” You may also contact your local office for 

assistance. You will find additional forms, resources, and program information at 

rd.usda.gov. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Last Updated December 2019
# C_2010179EN.01003903.xml

| 3.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/39

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 12 May 2010 — Reagens v Commission

(Case T-30/10 R)

(Application for interim measures - Competition - Commission decision imposing a fine - Bank guarantee - Application for suspension of operation of the decision - Financial loss - Absence of exceptional circumstances - No urgency)

(2010/C 179/69)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Reagens SpA (San Giorgio di Piano, Italy) (represented by: B. O’Connor, Solicitor, and L. Toffoletti, D. Gullo and E. De Giorgi, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Bourke and F. Ronkes Agerbeek, acting as Agents)

Re:

APPLICATION for suspension of operation of the Commission decision of 11 November 2009 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (COMP/38.589 — heat stabilisers)

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Costs are reserved.

---
# C_2011370EN.01002402.xml

| 17.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 370/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 370/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 November 2011 — Three-N-Products Private v OHIM — Shah (AYUURI NATURAL)

(Case T-313/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark AYUURI NATURAL - Earlier Community word and figurative marks AYUR - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2011/C 370/40

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Three-N-Products Private Ltd (New Delhi, India) (represented by: C. Jäger, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, Agent)

Defendant:

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Sheilesh Shah (Wembley, United Kingdom); and Akhil Shah (Wembley) (represented by: M. Chapple, Barrister)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 1 June 2010 (case R 1005/2009-4), relating to opposition proceedings between (i) Three-N-Products Private Ltd and (ii) S. Shah, A. Shah and Mr M. Shah.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for the Harmonisation of the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 1 June 2010 (case R 1005/2009-4); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for the Harmonisation of the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 1 June 2010 (case R 1005/2009-4);

| 2. | Orders OHIM to pay its own costs and those of Three-N-Products Private Ltd; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders OHIM to pay its own costs and those of Three-N-Products Private Ltd;

| 3. | Orders Sheleish Shah and Akhil Shah to bear their own costs and the costs necessarily incurred by Three-N-Products Private Ltd for the purposes of the proceedings before the Fourth Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Sheleish Shah and Akhil Shah to bear their own costs and the costs necessarily incurred by Three-N-Products Private Ltd for the purposes of the proceedings before the Fourth Board of Appeal.

---

(1)  OJ C 260, 25.9.2010.

1

---
### §376. Rate of interest paid to directors, etc.

No member bank shall pay to any director, officer, attorney, or employee a greater rate of interest on the deposits of such director, officer, attorney, or employee than that paid to other depositors on similar deposits with such member bank.

(Dec. 23, 1913, ch. 6, §22(e), as added Sept. 26, 1918, ch. 177, §5, 40 Stat. 971.)