alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010288EN.01004201.xml

| 23.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/42

---

Action brought on 3 August 2010 — Chabou v OHIM — Chalou Kleiderfabrik (CHABOU)

(Case T-323/10)

()

(2010/C 288/81)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Chickmouza Chabou (Rheine, Germany) (represented by: K.-J. Triebold, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Chalou Kleiderfabrik GmbH (Herschweiler-Pettersheim, Germany)

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 20 May 2010 in Case R 1165/2009-1 or amend that decision and reject the opposition |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 20 May 2010 in Case R 1165/2009-1 or amend that decision and reject the opposition

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant.

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark CHABOU for goods in class 25.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Chalou Kleiderfabrik GmbH.

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Word mark Chalou, registered as a national and international trade mark for goods in class 25.

Decision of the Opposition Division: The opposition was upheld.

Decision of the Board of Appeal: The appeal was dismissed.

Pleas in law: The contested decision fails to take account of the special circumstances of the present case and, instead, applies the established principles concerning the issues of the similarity of signs and of protected goods and services in the light of the likelihood of confusion in a purely formulaic and mechanical fashion, without sufficient regard to the specific aspects of the case and the requisite global assessment of all the circumstances.

---
Phantom 3 Pre
- Flight Inspection Check List

Pre
- Flight Check List  Visual inspection for defects  Batteries fully

charged and checked
- Transmitter, UAS, iPad, iPhone , approved/compatible device  Props tightened and locked  SD card in camera  Lens cap removed (As necessary )  Antennae up and parallel  Transmitter turned on (press once, release, then press and hold for 3 seconds)  Ensure Transmitter is in P Mode  UAS turned on (press once, release, then press and hold for 3 seconds)  Flick the transformation switch on transmitter up and down 4 times quickly to convert from travel mode to flight mode or use the app  DJI Pilot app quit and restarted, no other running apps on iPad  Tap bar at top of app (Safe to Fl y GPS) for full status  Maps are cached (move the map around, zoom in an out)  Minimum return height adjusted (check for talle st object and set accordingl y)  UAS placed in safe launch and recover position  Home point reprogrammed via app  Area clear of people / obstructions Flight Check Li st  Hover close for 20 seconds. Look / L isten for defects  Confirm expected stick operation  Monitor battery

power  Monitor signal strength  Keep line
- of

- sight with UAS

o Ensure area/zone of intended flight path is clear of other aerial traffic.

o Ensure area/zone of intended flight p ath is clear of any electrical/power lines

o Ensure atmospheric conditions are optimal for safe operation of UAV/UAS

o Select a safe zone to “ditch” the UAV/UAS in the event an emergency landing is required
Exhibit


EXHIBIT 10.18.10


OLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINE, INC.
NON-EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION STRUCTURE
EFFECTIVE DATE – JANUARY 1, 2016


	
			
	 
	Annual Retainer
	Annual Phantom

	Director Role
	Amount
	Stock Grant Amount

	Member (all non-executive directors)
	$75,000
	$100,000

	Lead Independent Director (1)
	20,000
	—

	Audit Committee Chairman (1)
	20,000
	—

	Compensation Committee Chairman (1)
	10,000
	—

	Governance and Nomination Committee Chairman (1)
	10,000
	—






		
	(1) 
	Each non-executive Chairman of a Board Committee and the Lead Independent Director receives this annual retainer in addition to the $75,000 annual retainer paid to all non-executive directors.
Comment Info: ================= General Comment:Alyeska Boiler Reconsideration Request
### §2734. Medal of honor: presentation of Medal of Honor Flag

The President shall provide for the presentation of the Medal of Honor Flag designated under section 903 of title 36 to each individual to whom a medal of honor is awarded under section 2732 of this title. Presentation of the flag shall be made at the same time as the presentation of the medal under section 2732 or 2743 of this title. In the case of a posthumous presentation of the medal, the flag shall be presented to the individual to whom the medal is presented.

(Added Pub. L. 107–248, title VIII, §8143(c)(4)(A), Oct. 23, 2002, 116 Stat. 1571, §505; amended Pub. L. 107–314, div. A, title X, §1062(b)(1), Dec. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 2650; Pub. L. 109–364, div. A, title V, §555(a), Oct. 17, 2006, 120 Stat. 2217; renumbered §2734 and amended Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §§116(b), 123(b)(2), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4226, 4240; Pub. L. 116–283, div. G, title LVXXXV [LXXXV], §8505(a)(27), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4749.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283 substituted "individual" for "person" in two places.

2018—Pub. L. 115–282, §123(b)(2), substituted "section 2732" for "section 491" and "section 2732 or 2743" for "section 491 or 498".

Pub. L. 115–282, §116(b), renumbered section 505 of this title as this section.

2006—Pub. L. 109–364 struck out "after October 23, 2002" after "section 491 of this title" and inserted at end "In the case of a posthumous presentation of the medal, the flag shall be presented to the person to whom the medal is presented."

2002—Pub. L. 107–314 substituted "October 23, 2002" for "the date of the enactment of this section".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Presentation of Flag for Prior Recipients of Medal of Honor

President to provide for the presentation of the Medal of Honor Flag to living recipients of the Medal of Honor as expeditiously as possible after Oct. 17, 2006, and for posthumous presentation to survivors of deceased recipients of the Medal of Honor upon written application therefor, see section 555(b) of Pub. L. 109–364, set out as a note under section 3755 of Title 10, Armed Forces.
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Seeks Applications to Support Economic Development and Create Jobs in

Rural Communities

WASHINGTON, Sept. 14, 2023 – U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) announced today that the 

Department is seeking applications from local lenders for funding to help create jobs and improve economic 

conditions for people in rural communities.

The funding is being made available under the Intermediary Relending Program. The program provides lowinterest loans to local lenders known as intermediaries, who then relend the funds to businesses to improve 

economic conditions and create new opportunities in rural communities. Eligible intermediary lenders include 

nonprofit corporations, cooperatives, federally recognized Tribes and public agencies.

Loans from an intermediary to an ultimate recipient business may be used for a variety of activities, including:

• acquire, build, convert, expand or repair a business or business facility.

• purchase or develop land. 

• purchase equipment, machinery or supplies, or make leasehold improvements.

• support start-up costs and working capital.

• control and abate pollution.

• support transportation services.

Applications are accepted on quarterly basis and must be submitted to the applicant’s local Rural Development 

State Office no later than 4:30 p.m. (local time) by the following dates: 

• First Quarter: Sept. 30, 2023. 

• Second Quarter: Dec. 31, 2023. 

• Third Quarter: March 31, 2024.

• Fourth Quarter: June 30, 2024.

USDA is offering priority points to projects that advance key priorities under the Biden-Harris Administration 

to help communities to create more and better market opportunities, advance equity, and combat climate 

change. These extra points will increase the likelihood of funding for projects that will advance these key 

priorities in rural places.

Eligible applications that are not funded in the quarter received will automatically compete for funding in up to 

three additional quarters.

For additional information, see page 63050 of the Sept. 14, 2023, Federal Register.

If you’d like to subscribe to USDA Rural Development updates, visit our GovDelivery subscriber page. 

###

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender.
Editorial Note on Part 28
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear at 76 FR 76873, Dec. 9, 2011.

§ 28.114 Pre-investigation proceedings. ( a ) Upon the filing of a valid petition, the General Counsel may request GAO to notify employees as to the existence of the petition by posting a notice for at least 10 days in locations appropriately selected to reach all employees in the unit covered by the petition. The notice shall include a request that the Board's General Counsel be notified of the existence of any other interested parties.
( b ) GAO shall supply the General Counsel with any information in its possession concerning other potentially interested labor organizations, copies of relevant correspondence, and copies of existing or recently expired agreements covering any employees in the unit. The GAO shall also provide a list of employees it believes should be included in the unit together with their classifications and the names and classifications of those employees it proposes to exclude from the unit.
( c ) All interested parties shall meet as soon as possible after the expiration of the 10-day posting period and shall attempt to resolve any issues in controversy.
( d ) A labor organization may become an intervenor in any representation proceeding by submitting to the General Counsel, within the 10-day period, evidence that it represents at least 10 percent of the employees in the proposed unit or that it is the exclusive representative of the employees involved. Denial of a request to intervene may be appealed to the Board. Such an appeal must be filed within 10 days of service of the General Counsel's determination.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 570 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 570

 To conduct or support further comprehensive research for the creation 
                   of a universal influenza vaccine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 26, 2019

Mr. Markey (for himself, Mr. Blumenthal, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. King, Mr. Van 
 Hollen, Ms. Smith, and Ms. Klobuchar) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To conduct or support further comprehensive research for the creation 
                   of a universal influenza vaccine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Flu Vaccine Act''.

SEC. 2. RESEARCH FOR THE CREATION OF A UNIVERSAL INFLUENZA VACCINE.

    (a) In General.--The Director of the National Institute of Allergy 
and Infectious Diseases shall conduct or support comprehensive research 
for the creation of a universal influenza vaccine.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--To carry out this section, 
there are authorized to be appropriated $200,000,000 for each of fiscal 
years 2020 through 2024.
                                 <all>
```
§ 77.25 Interstate movement from modified accredited advanced States and zones. Captive cervids that originate in a modified accredited advanced State or zone, and that are not known to be infected with or exposed to tuberculosis, may be moved interstate only in accordance with 9 CFR part 86 and, if moved anywhere other than directly to slaughter at a recognized slaughtering establishment, under one of the following additional conditions: ( a ) The captive cervids are from an accredited herd, qualified herd, or monitored herd; are officially identified; and are accompanied by an ICVI stating that the herd completed the requirements for accredited herd, qualified herd, or monitored herd status within 24 months prior to the date of movement.
( b ) The captive cervids are officially identified and are accompanied by an ICVI stating that they were negative to an official tuberculin test conducted within 90 days prior to the date of movement.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0146) [78 FR 2066, Jan. 9, 2013]
### §934. Penalty for unauthorized use of words "Coast Guard"

No individual, association, partnership, or corporation shall, without authority of the Commandant, use the combination of letters "USCG" or "USCGR", the words "Coast Guard," "United States Coast Guard," "Coast Guard Reserve," "United States Coast Guard Reserve," "Coast Guard Auxiliary," "United States Coast Guard Auxiliary," "Lighthouse Service," "Life Saving Service," or any combination or variation of such letters or words alone or with other letters or words, as the name under which he or it shall do business, for the purpose of trade, or by way of advertisement to induce the effect of leading the public to believe that any such individual, association, partnership, or corporation has any connection with the Coast Guard. No individual, association, partnership, or corporation shall falsely advertise, or otherwise represent falsely by any device whatsoever, that any project or business in which he or it is engaged, or product which he or it manufactures, deals in, or sells, has been in any way endorsed, authorized, or approved by the Coast Guard. Every person violating this section shall be fined not more than $10,000, or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

(Aug. 4, 1949, ch. 393, 63 Stat. 546, §639; Aug. 3, 1950, ch. 536, §30, 64 Stat. 408; Pub. L. 113–281, title II, §205(b), Dec. 18, 2014, 128 Stat. 3025; renumbered §934, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §107(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4205.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

This section makes the unauthorized use of the words "Coast Guard" or any derivative thereof, a crime. This is believed to be a desirable prohibition in view of the many commercial organizations which are manufacturing equipment approved by the Coast Guard and selling same to vessels in the United States. 81st Congress, House Report No. 557.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 639 of this title as this section.

2014—Pub. L. 113–281 substituted "$10,000" for "$1,000".

1950—Act Aug. 3, 1950, made it possible for Commandant to grant authority to private business organizations to use terms or designations otherwise prohibited by this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Coast Guard City, USA

Pub. L. 105–383, title IV, §409, Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3431, as amended by Pub. L. 114–120, title II, §206, Feb. 8, 2016, 130 Stat. 37, provided that: "The Commandant of the Coast Guard may recognize the community of Grand Haven, Michigan, as 'Coast Guard City, USA'. If the Commandant desires to recognize any other community in the same manner or any other community requests such recognition from the Coast Guard, the Commandant shall notify the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives 30 days prior to approving such recognition."
###### Editorial Note on Part 28

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear at 76 FR 76873, Dec. 9, 2011.

#### § 28.68 Stipulations.

The parties may stipulate as to any matter of fact. Such a stipulation will satisfy a party's burden of proving the fact alleged.
Editorial Note on Part 12
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 12 appear at 69 FR 32438, June 10, 2004.

§ 12.54 Testing spillway gates. ( a ) *General requirement.* An applicant or licensee must make adequate provision, to the satisfaction of the Regional Engineer or other authorized Commission representative, to ensure that all spillway gates are operable at all times, particularly during adverse weather conditions.
( b ) *Annual test.* ( 1 ) At least once each year, each spillway gate at a project must be operated to spill water, either during regular project operation or on a test basis.
( 2 ) If an applicant or licensee does not operate each spillway gate on a test basis during an inspection by the Commission staff, the applicant or licensee must submit to the Regional Engineer at least once each year a written statement, verified in accordance with § 12.13, that each spillway gate has been operated at least once during the twelve months preceding the inspection.
( c ) *Load-test of standby power.* ( 1 ) An applicant or licensee must load-test the standby emergency power for spillway gate operation at regular intervals, but not less than once during each year, and submit to the Regional Engineer, at least once each year, a written statement, verified in accordance with § 12.13, describing the intervals at which the standby emergency power was load-tested during the year preceding the inspection.
( 2 ) The Commission staff may direct that a spillway gate be operated using standby emergency power during an inspection.
[Order 122, 46 FR 9036, Jan. 28, 1981. Redesignated and amended at 87 FR 1519, Jan. 11, 2022; 87 FR 8411, Feb. 15, 2022]
# C_2012006EN.01002401.xml

| 7.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/24

---

Order of the General Court of 8 November 2011 — Unilever Espãna and Unilever v OHIM — Med Trans G. Poulias-S. Brakatselos (MED FRIGO S.A.)

(Case T-287/10) (1)

1

2012/C 6/44

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 234, 28.8.2010.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 47 (Thursday, March 10, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 13135]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5569]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Notice of Availability of Government-Owned Inventions; Available 
for Licensing

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The invention listed below is a CRADA Subject Invention, 
jointly-made under NCRADA-NAWCWDCL-03-111, and is assigned to Reynolds 
Systems, Inc. The United States Government, as represented by the 
Secretary of the Navy, has an undivided interest in this invention. 
U.S. Patent No. 7,661,362: Energetic material initiation device 
utilizing exploding foil initiated ignition system with secondary 
explosive material.

ADDRESSES: Requests for copies of the inventions cited should be 
directed to Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division, Code 4L4000D, 
1900 N. Knox Road Stop 6312, China Lake, CA 93555-6106 and must include 
the Navy Case number.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael D. Seltzer, Ph.D., Head, 
Technology Transfer Office, Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division, 
Code 4L4000D, 1900 N. Knox Road Stop 6312, China Lake, CA 93555-6106, 
telephone 760-939-1074, FAX 760-939-1210, E-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#462b2f252e27232a6835232a323c2334062827303f682b2f2a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="dab7b3b9b2bbbfb6f4a9bfb6aea0bfa89ab4bbaca3f4b7b3b6">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Authority:  35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR 404.7.

    Dated: March 3, 2011.
D. J. Werner,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-5569 Filed 3-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Eachof the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of August TechnologyCorporation (the “Company”), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adoptedpursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of hisknowledge:

 

(1)                                  The Amendment No. 1 of the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q/Afor the period ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Date: November 9,2005
|   | /s/ Jeff L. O’Dell  |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | Jeff L. O’Dell      |
|   | Chief Executive  Officer |
|   |                     |
|   |                     |
|   | /s/ Stanley D.  Piekos   |   |
|   | Stanley D.  Piekos       |
|   | Chief Financial  Officer |
|        |                          |        |  |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to August Technology Corporation and will be retained by August Technology Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Exhibit






AMENDMENT NUMBER 3
TO THE DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PROVISIONS (APPENDIX B) OF THE
 CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY PENSION PLAN
CONSOLIDATED AS AT JANUARY 1, 2009
Effective January 1, 2013,
		
	1.
	Delete Section B.1.14 and replace it with the following:


B.1.14    Executive DC Member
“Executive DC Member” means a DC Member who holds a permanent position in an eligible salary classification as determined by the Board.


		
	2.
	Delete clause B.1.10(b)(i) and replace it with the following:


B.1.10 (b) (i)        a Management Employee who:
		
	(A)
	was a DC Member on June 30, 2010 and who elected, 
effective August 6, 2010, or


(B)    was a DC1 Member who elected effective June 7, 2013,
to contribute in accordance with clause B.8.1(a)(ii)(B);
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.77




AMENDMENT NO. 1 
TO THE HAMILTON BEACH BRANDS, INC. 
EXCESS RETIREMENT PLAN
(AS AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2015)
Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc. hereby adopts this Amendment No. 1 to the Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc. Excess Retirement Plan (Effective January 1, 2015), effective January 1, 2016.  Words and phrases used herein with initial capital letters that are defined in the Plan are used herein as so defined.
Section 1
Section 4.3(a) of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
“(a) The Company (without the consent of any Employer but with the approval or ratification of the Compensation Committee) may change (or suspend) (i) the interest rate credited to Sub-Accounts hereunder  and/or (ii) the amount of the uplift credited to Sub-Accounts hereunder.”
Section 3
The first clause of the first sentence of Section 9.5 of the Plan is hereby amended to read as follows:
“The Company (without the consent of any Employer but with the approval or ratification of the NACCO Industries, Inc. Benefits Committee) may at any time amend any or all of the provisions of this Plan,”.


EXECUTED this 20th day of November, 2015.


HAMILTON BEACH BRANDS, INC.




/s/ J.C. Butler, Jr.                                            
By: J.C. Butler, Jr.
Title: Assistant Secretary



            1