alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010148EN.01004702.xml

| 5.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/47

---

Action brought on 8 April 2010 — Longevity Health Products v OHIM — Tecnifar (E-PLEX)

(Case T-161/10)

2010/C 148/77

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Longevity Health Products, Inc. (Nassau, Bahamas) (represented by: J. Korab, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Tecnifar — Industria Tecnica Farmaceutica, SA (Lisbon, Portugal)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Admit the complaint filed by the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

Admit the complaint filed by the applicant;

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 5 February 2010 in case R 662/2009-4 and dismiss the opposition filed by the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal with respect to pharmaceutical and veterinary medical products with the exception of medicinal products for diseases related to the central nervous system; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 5 February 2010 in case R 662/2009-4 and dismiss the opposition filed by the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal with respect to pharmaceutical and veterinary medical products with the exception of medicinal products for diseases related to the central nervous system; and

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark “E-PLEX”, for goods and services in classes 3, 5 and 35

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited: Portuguese trade mark registration of the word mark “EPILEX”, for goods in class 5

Mark or sign cited:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Partially allowed the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Partially dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009 as the Board of Appeal wrongly found that there was a likelihood of confusion between the trade marks concerned.

Pleas in law:

---
### §645a. Annual report on suspensions and debarments proposed by Small Business Administration

#### (a) Report requirement

The Administrator of the Small Business Administration shall submit each year to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship of the Senate, and the Committee on Small Business of the House of Representatives a report on the suspension and debarment actions taken by the Administrator during the year preceding the year of submission of the report.

#### (b) Matters covered

The report required by subsection (a) shall include the following information for the year covered by the report:

#### (1) Number

The number of contractors proposed for suspension or debarment.

#### (2) Source

The office within a Federal agency that originated each proposal for suspension or debarment.

#### (3) Reasons

The reason for each proposal for suspension or debarment.

#### (4) Results

The result of each proposal for suspension or debarment, and the reason for such result.

#### (5) Referrals

The number of suspensions or debarments referred to the Inspector General of the Small Business Administration or another agency, or to the Attorney General (for purposes of this paragraph, the Administrator may redact identifying information on names of companies or other information in order to protect the integrity of any ongoing criminal or civil investigation).

(Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title XVI, §1683, Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 2086.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013, and not as part of the Small Business Act which comprises this chapter.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, February 08, 2017.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, February 08, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A17A0625. GREGORY BROOKS v. BLUE BIRD CORPORATION et al..

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW 

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 19

- 00480

- CV

IN RE Claudia LOPEZ Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Irene Rios, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 24, 2019

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED On July 15, 2019, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining of the trial

court ’ s denial of her motion for new trial. Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will issue only to correct a clear abuse of discretion when there is no other adequate remedy at law. In re
Sw. Bell Tel. Co., L.P. , 235 S.W.3d 619, 623 (Tex. 2007) (orig. proceeding). The d enial of a

motion for new trial may be raised on appeal from final judgment

. In re Magana , 14

- 13

- 00563

- CV, 2013 WL 3771298, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] July 18, 2013, orig. proceeding ) (per curiam) (mem. op) . Here, r elator has an appeal pending in this c ourt. Consequently, relator has an adequate remedy at law and, therefore, is not entitled to mandamus relief. See id. Accordingly , we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2008

- CI

- 19681, styled In the Interest of T.H.C., a Minor , pending in the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Cynthia Marie Chapa presiding.
Exhibit 11.1

<TABLE>
                                                     Asante Technologies, Inc.
                                                 Calculation of Earnings per Share
                                              (in thousands, except per share amounts)
                                                        
                                                        
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                       Year ended
                                                                                      ----------------------------------------------
                                                                                      September 27,    September 28,   September 30,
                                                                                          1997             1996            1995
                                                                                      ----------------------------------------------
<S>                                                                                      <C>             <C>              <C>     
Net income (loss)                                                                        $ 1,926         $  (457)         $(3,705)
                                                                                         =======         =======          =======

Average number of common and common equivalent shares:
        Weighted average common shares outstanding                                         8,945           8,718            8,288
        Dilutive common stock equivalents:
           Common stock options, using modified treasury stock method                        158             279                *
                                                                                         -------         -------          -------
Common and common equivalent shares to be used in the
        calculation of net income per share                                                9,103           8,997            8,288
                                                                                         =======         =======          =======


Earnings (loss) per share                                                                $  0.21         $ (0.05)         $ (0.45)
                                                                                         =======         =======          =======


<FN>
                * Antidilutive
</FN>
</TABLE>
§ 111.40 What happens if the respondent does not pay the civil money penalty pursuant to 11 CFR 111.34 and does not submit a written response to the reason to believe finding pursuant to 11 CFR 111.35? ( a ) If the Commission, after the respondent has failed to pay the civil money penalty and has failed to submit a written response, determines by an affirmative vote of at least four (4) of its members that the respondent has violated 52 U.S.C. 30104(a) and determines the amount of the civil money penalty, the respondent shall be notified in writing of its final determination.
( b ) The respondent shall transmit payment of the civil money penalty to the Commission within thirty (30) days of receipt of the Commission's final determination.
( c ) Failure to pay the civil money penalty may result in the commencement of collection action under 31 U.S.C. 3701 *et seq.* (1996), or a civil suit pursuant to 52 U.S.C. 30109(a)(6)(A), or any other legal action deemed necessary by the Commission.
[65 FR 31794, May 19, 2000, as amended at 79 FR 77848, Dec. 29, 2014; 89 FR 218, Jan. 2, 2024]
§ 157.33 Requirement for open season. ( a ) Any application for a certificate of public convenience and necessity or other authorization for a proposed Alaska natural gas transportation project must include a demonstration that the applicant has conducted an open season for capacity on its proposed project, in accordance with the requirements of this subpart. Failure to provide the requisite demonstration will result in an application being rejected as incomplete.
( b ) Initial capacity on a proposed Alaska natural gas transportation project may be acquired prior to an open season through pre-subscription agreements, provided that in any open season as required in paragraph (a) of this section, capacity is offered to all prospective bidders at the same rates and on the same terms and conditions as contained in the pre-subscription agreements. All pre-subscription agreements shall be made public by posting on Internet websites and press releases within ten days of their execution. In the event there is more than one such agreement, all prospective bidders shall be allowed the option of selecting among the several agreements all of the rates, terms and conditions contained in any one such agreement.
[Order 2005, 70 FR 8286, Feb. 18, 2005, as amended by Order 2005-A, 70 FR 35026, June 16, 2005]
#### § 311.24 Hogs affected with tapeworm cysts.

Carcasses of hogs affected with tapeworm cysts (Cysticercus cellulosae) may be passed for cooking, unless the infestation is excessive, in which case the carcass shall be condemned.
§ 9410.5 Disclosure of requested information to individuals. ( a ) Upon submission of proof of identification as required by § 9410.4, the Commission shall allow the individual to see and/or obtain a copy of the requested record or shall send a copy of the record to the individual by registered mail. If the individual requests to see the record, the Commission may make the record available either at the location where the record is maintained or at a place more suitable to the requestor, if possible. The record shall be made available as soon as possible, but in no event later than 15 working days after proof of identification. The individual may have a person or persons of his or her own choosing accompany him or her when the record is disclosed.
( b ) The Commission must furnish each record requested by an individual under this part in a form intelligible to that individual.
( c ) If the Commission denies access to a record to an individual, he or she shall be advised of the reason for the denial and advised of the right to judicial review.
( d ) Upon request, an individual will be provided access to the accounting of disclosures from his or her record under the same procedures as provided above and in § 9410.4.
#### § 1317.100 Purpose and effective date.

The purpose of these Title IX regulations is to effectuate Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (except sections 904 and 906 of those Amendments) (20 U.S.C. 1681, 1682, 1683, 1685, 1686, 1687, 1688), which is designed to eliminate (with certain exceptions) discrimination on the basis of sex in any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance, whether or not such program or activity is offered or sponsored by an educational institution as defined in these Title IX regulations. The effective date of these Title IX regulations shall be September 29, 2000.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>            5
<MULTIPLIER>         1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          41,446
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,105
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,044
<INVENTORY>                                     61,862
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               167,626
<PP&E>                                         262,791
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,772
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 815,708
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          172,042
<BONDS>                                        538,547
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     109,290
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   815,708
<SALES>                                        998,680
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               998,680
<CGS>                                          811,592
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  811,592
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               221,948
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                23,349
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              45,611
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (80,471)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (28,826)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (51,645)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (51,645)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 9 (Thursday, January 13, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2361-2362]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-546]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. PR11-77-000]


Atmos Energy--Kentucky/Mid-States Division; Notice of Baseline 
Filing

January 5, 2011.
    Take notice that on December 30, 2010, Atmos Energy--Kentucky/Mid-
States Division submitted a revised baseline filing of their Statement 
of Operating Conditions for services provided under Section 311 of the 
Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978 (``NGPA'').
    Any person desiring to participate in this rate proceeding must 
file a motion to intervene or to protest this filing must file in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be considered 
by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, 
but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or 
motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests 
must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing 
an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that document on the 
Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on or before the 
intervention or protest date need not serve motions to intervene or 
protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 7 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to

[[Page 2362]]

receive e-mail notification when a document is added to a subscribed 
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7b3d3e293834151712151e280e0b0b14090f3b1d1e0918551c140d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ebadaeb9a8a4858782858eb89e9b9b84999fab8d8e9988c58c849d">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 pm Eastern Time on Friday, January 14, 2011.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-546 Filed 1-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 685 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 685

 To amend the Inspector General Act of 1978 relative to the powers of 
              the Department of Justice Inspector General.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 6, 2019

Mr. Lee (for himself, Mr. Grassley, Ms. Murkowski, Mrs. Blackburn, and 
  Mr. Rubio) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Inspector General Act of 1978 relative to the powers of 
              the Department of Justice Inspector General.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Inspector General Access Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. INVESTIGATIONS OF DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE PERSONNEL.

    Section 8E of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) in paragraph (2), by striking ``and paragraph 
                (3)'';
                    (B) by striking paragraph (3);
                    (C) by redesignating paragraphs (4) and (5) as 
                paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively; and
                    (D) in paragraph (4), as redesignated, by striking 
                ``paragraph (4)'' and inserting ``paragraph (3)''; and
            (2) in subsection (d), by striking ``, except with respect 
        to allegations described in subsection (b)(3),''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2010221EN.01006103.xml

| 14.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/61

---

Action brought on 3 July 2010 — Merhzaoui v Council

(Case F-52/10)

()

2010/C 221/99

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Mohamed Merhzaoui (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of 12 May 2010 establishing the applicant’s definitive staff report for the period from 1 January 2008 to 30 June 2009.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | annul the decision of 12 May 2010 establishing the applicant’s definitive staff report for the 2008-2009 period; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of 12 May 2010 establishing the applicant’s definitive staff report for the 2008-2009 period;

| — | order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs.

---
§ 416.12 Development of Sanitation SOP's. ( a ) The Sanitation SOP's shall describe all procedures an official establishment will conduct daily, before and during operations, sufficient to prevent direct contamination or adulteration of product(s).
( b ) The Sanitation SOP's shall be signed and dated by the individual with overall authority on-site or a higher level official of the establishment. This signature shall signify that the establishment will implement the Sanitation SOP's as specified and will maintain the Sanitation SOP's in accordance with the requirements of this part. The Sanitation SOP's shall be signed and dated upon initially implementing the Sanitation SOP's and upon any modification to the Sanitation SOP's.
( c ) Procedures in the Sanitation SOP's that are to be conducted prior to operations shall be identified as such, and shall address, at a minimum, the cleaning of food contact surfaces of facilities, equipment, and utensils.
( d ) The Sanitation SOP's shall specify the frequency with which each procedure in the Sanitation SOP's is to be conducted and identify the establishment employee(s) responsible for the implementation and maintenance of such procedure(s).