alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010179EN.01005801.xml

| 3.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/58

---

Action brought on 6 May 2010 — Costa v Commission

(Case F-26/10)

(2010/C 179/100)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Antonino Costa (Thionville, France) (represented by: L. Levi and M. Vandenbussche, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision to exclude the applicant from the 2009 promotion exercise and order that the defendant pay to him a sum of compensation for non-material damage.

Form of order sought

| — | annul the decision of the appointing authority, known to the applicant on 22 November 2009, to exclude him from the 2009 promotion exercise; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the appointing authority, known to the applicant on 22 November 2009, to exclude him from the 2009 promotion exercise;

| — | so far as necessary, annul the decision of 27 January 2010 rejecting the complaint; |
| --- | --- |

—

so far as necessary, annul the decision of 27 January 2010 rejecting the complaint;

| — | consequently, oblige the defendant to recommence properly the 2009 promotion exercise, in which the applicant should be included; |
| --- | --- |

—

consequently, oblige the defendant to recommence properly the 2009 promotion exercise, in which the applicant should be included;

| — | order the defendant to pay a sum of EUR 25 000 in compensation for non-material damage; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay a sum of EUR 25 000 in compensation for non-material damage;

| — | order the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Commission to pay the costs.

---
# C_2012065EN.01001203.xml

| 3.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 65/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 65/12

---

Judgment of the General Court of 25 January 2012 — Viaguara v OHIM

(Case T-332/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark ‘VIAGUARA’ - Earlier Community word mark VIAGRA - Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier trade mark - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2012/C 65/23

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Viaguara S.A. (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: R. Skubisz, M. Mazurek and J. Dudzik, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: K. Zajfert, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Pfizer Inc. (New York, New York, United States) (represented by: initially M. Hawkins, Solicitor, V. von Bomhard and A. Renck, lawyers, then V. von Bomhard and M. Fowler, Solicitor)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 May 2010 (Case R 946/2009-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Pfizer Inc. and Viaguara S.A.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders Viaguara S.A. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Viaguara S.A. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 301, 6.11.2010.

1

---
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Invites Partners to Join the Rural Workforce Innovation Network (RWIN)

WASHINGTON, Aug. 24, 2018 – Assistant to the Secretary for Rural Development Anne Hazlett today 

announced that USDA is inviting organizations to join a national network of public-private partners to support 

rural workforce development and skills management.

USDA’s Rural Development Innovation Center created the Rural Workforce Innovation Network (RWIN) 

initiative to enable rural partners to share solutions to complex issues, identify available resources, and increase

access to workforce opportunities. The network also will collaborate to ensure that rural workers have access to 

training that aligns with the skills employers need.

Please indicate your interest in joining the network by emailing RD.Innovation@osec.usda.gov by Aug. 31, 

2018.

Interested partners should submit a document no longer than two pages that includes the organization’s 

name, contact information, and its past and present contributions, which should include one or more of the 

following workforce development interests:

Use of labor market and data to drive strategies;

Public-private collaboration to attract employers and define workforce requirements;

Workforce readiness and training;

Apprenticeship and job placements;

Recruitment and retention;

Sector-based best practices related to workforce (i.e. veterans, telecommunications, water, 

manufacturing, health care, etc.); and

Succession planning, including strategies such as worker cooperatives.

RWIN members will be announced in September.

#
### **CHAPTER 29—MANUFACTURE, TRANSPORTATION, OR DISTRIBUTION OF SWITCHBLADE KNIVES**

Sec.
1241.
Definitions.
1242.
Introduction, manufacture for introduction, transportation or distribution in interstate commerce; penalty.
1243.
Manufacture, sale, or possession within specific jurisdictions; penalty.
1244.
Exceptions.
1245.
Ballistic knives.
§ 327.26 Official import inspection marks and devices. ( a ) When import inspections are performed in official import inspection establishments, the official inspection legend to be applied to imported meat and meat food products shall be in the appropriate form[1] as herein specified. For application to cattle, sheep, swine, and goat carcasses, primal parts, and cuts, not in containers. For application to outside containers of meat and meat food products prepared from cattle, sheep, swine, and goats. For application to horse carcasses, primal parts, and cuts, not in containers. For application to outside containers of horsemeat food products. For application to mule and other (nonhorse) equine carcasses, primal parts, and cuts, not in containers. For application to outside containers of equine meat food products.
( b ) Except for product offered for entry from Canada, when import inspections are performed in official establishments the official inspection legend to be applied to meat and meat food products offered for entry shall be the appropriate form as specified in §§ 312.2 and 312.3 of this subchapter.
( c ) When products are refused entry into the United States, the official mark to be applied to the products refused entry shall be in the following form:
( d ) Devices for applying “United States Refused Entry” marks shall be furnished to Program inspectors by the Department.
( e ) The ordering and manufacture of brands containing official inspection legends shall be in accordance with the provisions contained in § 317.3(c) of the Federal meat inspection regulations.
[51 FR 37708, Oct. 24, 1986, as amended at 54 FR 41049, Oct. 5, 1989] Footnotes -
327.26
[1] The number “I-38” is given as an example only. The establishment number of the official import inspection establishment where the imported product is inspected shall be used in lieu thereof.
## *M*.t 4. 2015 RECEIVEDIN COURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALS The Court of Criminal Appeals Office of the Clerk 

### P.O. Box 12308, Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711
RE:Gomez v. State, PD-0138-15 COA no. 12-13-0050-CR Tr.Ct.No. 241-0529-12 

## AUG 112015 

## A&eEAcosta,Clerk

Dear Clerk/ 

### I recently received the answer to my correspondence concerning the status of my P.D.R. The Court notified me on July 

### 24/ 2015/ that my P.D.R. was Refused on 6/17/2015/ however/ I never received any notification from the Court. Would you please verify that the notification was properly forwarded to me here at the below enlisted address/ and contact me at the same address. 

### Thank you for your time/



## Cffiar ftomgrZCesar Gomez TDCJ-ID t 1839985 Bastham Unit 2665 Prison Road # 1 

### Lovelady/ Texas 75851 cc/ file
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Seeks Applications for Community Development Grants

WASHINGTON, April 26, 2018 – Assistant to the Secretary for Rural Development Anne Hazlett today 

announced that USDA is accepting applications for grants to support economic development in rural 

communities.

USDA is making grants available under the Rural Community Development Initiative (RCDI) program to 

strengthen the rural economy. Qualified intermediary organizations receiving RCDI grants will provide 

technical assistance and training to help nonprofit organizations and communities develop their capacity to 

undertake housing, community facilities or economic development projects. Applicants must have capacitybuilding experience for these types of projects and must provide matching funds at least equal to the RCDI 

grant.

Eligible recipients are nonprofit organizations, low-income rural communities or federally recognized tribes. 

RCDI grants are not provided directly to businesses or individuals. Examples of eligible projects include 

homeownership education, minority business entrepreneurship, strategic community planning or assistance to 

access alternative funding sources.

Applications are due June 25, 2018. For more information, see page 18264 of the April 26 Federal Register.

USDA encourages applications that will support recommendations made in the report to the President from 

the Task Force on Agriculture and Rural Prosperity to help improve life in rural America. Applicants are 

encouraged to consider projects that provide measurable results in helping rural communities build robust and 

sustainable economies through strategic investments in infrastructure, partnerships and innovation. Key 

strategies include:

• Achieving e-Connectivity for Rural America

• Developing the Rural Economy

• Harnessing Technological Innovation

• Supporting a Rural Workforce

• Improving Quality of Life

#

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender.
2015 CROP YEAR

NON-IRRIGATED PEANUTS

YIELD EXCLUSION (YE)

Gulf of Mexico

Atlantic

Ocean

Pacific

Ocean

-130° -120° -110° -100° -90° -80° -70°

45° 40° 35° 30° 25°

Coordinate System: Albers

Central Meridian: 96°0'0"W

1st Std Parallel: 20°0'0"N

2nd Std Parallel: 60°0'0"N

Latitude of Origin: 40°0'0"N

Metadata:

County Files - US Census Tiger

Files 2013

YE Coverage - USDA - RMA

December 2014

0 125 250 500 750 1,000

Miles

STATEMENT

The Maps produced represent

the number of years (since 1995)

eligible for yield exclusion for the

2015 crop year.

Document Path: K:\APH\NonIrrigated\Peanuts\Non-IrrigatedPeanuts.mxd

TABLE

Links directly to the state table

(double click)

Number of Years Eligible for

Yield Exclusion (YE)

0 years

1 year

2 to 4 years

5 to 7 years

8 to 10 years

11 to 15 years
§ 292.26 What effect do these regulations have on pending applications, final agency decisions, and opinions already issued? These regulations apply to all requests pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 2719, except: ( a ) These regulations do not alter final agency decisions made pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 2719 before the date of enactment of these regulations.
( b ) These regulations apply to final agency action taken after the effective date of these regulations except that these regulations shall not apply to applicable agency actions when, before the effective date of these regulations, the Department or the National Indian Gaming Commission (NIGC) issued a written opinion regarding the applicability of 25 U.S.C. 2719 for land to be used for a particular gaming establishment, provided that the Department or the NIGC retains full discretion to qualify, withdraw or modify such opinions.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 9, 2016

p1108 

# Order

Clerk November 9, 2016

153629

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 153629

COA: 331318

Van Buren CC: 15

- 019892

- FC

JUAN CARLOS BARRERA,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 10, 2016 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, beca use we are not persuaded

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

M ARKMAN

, J. ( concurring ). For the reasons set forth in my concurring statement

in People v Keefe , 498 Mich 962 (2015), I concur with the Court’s order as it pertains to

the sentence imposed in this case.
#### § 571.10 Geographical location.

The attendance of witnesses and the production of books, papers, and documents, may be required from any place in the United States at any designated place of hearing.
#### § 25.6 Disturbances.

Loitering, disorderly conduct, or other conduct in the GAO Building or on its grounds which creates loud or unusual noise or a nuisance; which unreasonably obstructs the usual use of entrances, foyers, lobbies, corridors, offices, elevators, escalators, stairways, or parking areas; which otherwise impedes or disrupts the performance of official duties by government employees; or which prevents the general public from obtaining the administrative services provided in the GAO Building in a timely manner, is prohibited.
#### § 534.4 Transportation to processing plant.

A vehicle used to transport fish from a producer's premises to a processing establishment must be equipped with vats or other containers for holding the fish. The vats or other containers must be maintained in a sanitary condition. Sufficient water and sufficient oxygen must be provided to the vats that hold the fish to ensure that fish delivered to the processing establishment will not be adulterated. Any fish that are dead, dying, diseased, or contaminated with substances that may adulterate fish products are subject to condemnation at the official fish processing establishments.
### §2514. Authorization for appropriations

(a) There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of Energy, for purposes of carrying out this chapter, (1) not to exceed $30,000,000 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1977, except that at least $10,000,000 of such authorization shall be allocated for battery research and development; (2) not to exceed $40,000,000 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1978; (3) not to exceed $25,000,000 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1979; (4) not to exceed $20,000,000 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1980; and (5) not to exceed $45,000,000 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1981. Any amount appropriated pursuant to this section shall remain available until expended, and any amount authorized for any fiscal year prior to the fiscal year ending September 30, 1981, but not appropriated, may be appropriated for any succeeding fiscal year through the fiscal year ending September 30, 1983.

(b) Any moneys received by the Secretary of Energy from vehicle sales or leases or other activities under this chapter may be retained and used for purposes of carrying out this chapter, notwithstanding the provisions of section 3302(b) of title 31, and may remain available until expended; but the amount authorized to be appropriated for any fiscal year under subsection (a) shall be reduced by the amount of the moneys so received in that year.

(Pub. L. 94–413, §16, Sept. 17, 1976, 90 Stat. 1270; Pub. L. 95–91, title III, §301(a), Aug. 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 577.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

In subsec. (b), "section 3302(b) of title 31" substituted for "section 3617 of the Revised Statutes (31 U.S.C. 484)" on authority of Pub. L. 97–258, §4(b), Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1067, the first section of which enacted Title 31, Money and Finance.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

"Secretary of Energy" substituted in text for "Administrator" pursuant to section 301(a) of Pub. L. 95–91, see Codification note set out under section 2502 of this title.
**Washington Rural Development State Office**1835 Black Lake Blvd SWOlympia, WA (360) 704-7700

**Questions about Multi-Family Housing Programs?**Call 1-800-292-8293

                          -    - State DirectorHelen Price Johnson (View Bio)
 
                          -                      View All State Contacts                   
                          -                        Follow the RD Washington Office on X                     
                          -                        Receive Emails Through GovDelivery                     

## Rural Development Success Stories

### Addressing Water Access Challenges Through USDA Rural Development’s Commitment to Rural Communities

Read More

### Washington State Company Exemplifies Spirit of National Biobased Product Day Through USDA Grant Funding To Increase Organic Fertilizer Production

### USDA Helps Mustard Seed Village Cultivate Change: A Greenhouse Model Blossoming with Community Engagement and Elder Care Innovations

### Dog Saves His Human From Fire in Forks

View All Success Stories

## Highlights and Announcements

                                -    NOTICE OF CHANGES TO ELIGIBLE AREA MAPS FOR USDA RURAL  DEVELOPMENT HOUSING... 

### Featured Programs

                          -  Rural Energy for America Program Renewable Energy Systems & Energy Efficiency Improvement Guaranteed Loans & Grants 
                          -  Single Family Housing Direct Home Loans 
                          -  Single Family Housing Repair Loans & Grants 
                          -  Water & Waste Disposal Loan & Grant Program 
                          -  Community Facilities Direct Loan & Grant Program 
View All State Programs

### Resources

**Check Eligibility**Check a home, town or service location to verify eligibility for Rural Programs

**Manage your USDA Loan**You can create an account and manage your current loan through the Customer Service Center (CSC) portal. You can also contact the CSC at 800-414-1226
View All Resources

## Rural Development News

                                -  USDA Invests in Clean Energy to Strengthen American Farms and Businesses as Part of Investing in America AgendaMar 28, 2024 
                                -  USDA To Award Technical Assistance Grant to Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation to Promote the Expansion of High-Speed InternetFeb 21, 2024 
                                -  USDA Invests in Clean Energy Projects to Strengthen Washington Farms and Businesses as part of Investing in America AgendaJan 22, 2024 
                                -  USDA Now Accepting Applications for 40 Climate Change Fellows to Help Record Number of Farmers and Rural Small Businesses Access Clean Energy Funds from President Biden’s Investing in America AgendaDec 22, 2023 
                                -  USDA Rural Development invests in Underserved Rural and Tribal Communities to Create Economic and Educational Opportunities.Dec 13, 2023 
                                -  USDA Partners with Ag Producers to Strengthen Agricultural Supply Chains and Lower Food CostsNov 27, 2023 

View All State News
§ 2.2 References. ( a ) Subchapters III and IV of Chapter 7 of Title 31 U.S.C.
( b ) Title 5, United States Code.
[45 FR 68375, Oct. 15, 1980, as amended at 47 FR 56979, Dec. 22, 1982]
Gross Liability Gross Premium Gross Indemnity Retained Liability Retained Premium Retained Ind

 846,125,321 21,106,174,932 572,447,234 11,520,681,311 466,737,526 321,7

Footnote:Amounts shown are for policies that have reached the Premium Billing Date according to the actuarial documents. 

2022 Livestock Reinsurance Data

National Totals

As of 03/2024

Page 1 of 1
101 Main Street 

Canton, NY 13617 

315-386^000 1 -877-228-7810 

www. northcountryguide. com 

September 20, 2010 

Susan L. Kurland — H-^-^^ 

Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs . Ijjfij.M' 

U.S. Department of Transportation ^, ^^^ ^ 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE " : ^: -"'" ' 

Washington, DC 20590 ^ ' ^ 

Re: Grant Application of Town of Massena Under the DOT Small 

Community Air Service Development Program 

DOCKET DOT-OST-2010-0124 

Dear Ms. Kurland: 

This letter supports the application filed by the TOWTI of Massena to market Essential Air 

Service at the Massena International Airport. 

As Executive Director, I also wish to confirm the commitment of the St. Lawrence 

County Chamber of Commerce to achieving the objectives of the marketing grant 

application. 

Specifically, we understand and agree to assist the Town of Massena with: 

• Planning and implementing grant-funded "Fly Massena" events/promotions to 

encourage use of the EAS service at the Massena Airport 

• Providing input into "Fly Massena" marketing materials 

• Providing guidance and assistance to professionals working on air service data 

collection and market research in support of improving EAS enplanements. 

The St. Lawrence County Chamber of Commerce applauds the ongoing work of the 

Town of Massena, and of the St. Lawrence Valley Air Task Force from 2004 onward, 

toward improving air service in the central part of the rural. Northern New York 

Canadian border region. We concur that increasing enplanement numbers in Massena, 

through the EAS marketing program proposed in its grant application, is the next step in 

the process of attracting a carrier that will work with us to move beyond subsidized air 

service. 
--2-EAS Support -

We encourage US DOT to award the Town of Massena grant funding to promote their 

EAS service. In return, we will do our best, as a community partner, to assure the 

success of the "Fly Massena" campaign. 

Sincerely, 

Pat McKeown, 

Executive Director 

Cc: Joseph D. Gray, Supervisor, Town of Massena
DEPIOFTBAMoi 

; ", ,.\ ! ! , !. ~J 

OST-2010-0046 

Secretary of the DOT 

Dear Sir: 

You can be the hero of everyone in Mercer county by simply recognizing the 

fact that holding a vote is little to ask and our right. This would prove that 

the majority want mountain time. 

Rural Mercer County Resident
# C_2012013EN.01001401.xml

| 14.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/14

---

Judgment of the General Court of 23 November 2011 — Pukka Luggage v OHIM — Azpiroz Arruti (PUKKA)

(Case T-483/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark PUKKA - Opposition by the proprietor of Community and national figurative marks featuring the word element pukas - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Partial refusal to register)

2012/C 13/28

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: The Pukka Luggage Company Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: K. Gilbert and M. Blair, Solicitors)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Jesús Miguel Azpiroz Arruti (San Sebastián, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 July 2010 (Case R 1175/2008-4), concerning opposition proceedings between Jesús Miguel Azpiroz Arruti and The Pukka Luggage Company Ltd.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders The Pukka Luggage Company Ltd to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders The Pukka Luggage Company Ltd to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 328, 4.12.2010.

1

---