alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 46 / Wednesday, March 9, 2011 / Presidential Documents 12819 

Proclamation 8635 of March 4, 2011 

Save Your Vision Week, 2011 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

Across America, millions of men and women experience vision loss or 

are affected by low vision or blindness. During Save Your Vision Week, 

we reinforce the importance of routine eye care and remind all Americans 

to take action to safeguard their eyesight. 

Vision is important to our everyday activities, and we can all take steps 

to protect and prolong our eye health. Through Healthy People 2020, the 

Department of Health and Human Services’ science-based agenda to prevent 

disease and promote health, our country’s leading health officials have identified interventions to preserve sight and prevent blindness. Though some 

eye diseases and injuries are preventable or treatable with early detection 

and timely treatment, many Americans do not receive recommended eye 

exams and screenings. Healthy People 2020 advises each American to get 

vision check-ups regularly in order to identify vision impairments at an 

early stage. For more information about eye health or help finding an eye 

care professional, I encourage all Americans to visit: www.NEI.NIH.gov. 

Preventive eye care, including wearing ultraviolet-protective eyewear and 

following good eating habits, can help support a healthy and active lifestyle 

at any age. By seeking out information and taking action to protect healthy 

vision—and encouraging others to do so as well—all Americans can help 

preserve the precious gift of sight. 

To remind Americans of the importance of safeguarding their eyesight, the 

United States Congress, by joint resolution approved December 30, 1963, 

as amended (77 Stat. 629; 36 U.S.C. 138), has authorized and requested 

the President to proclaim the first week in March of each year as ‘‘Save 

Your Vision Week.’’ 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States 

of America, do hereby proclaim March 6 through March 12, 2011, as Save 

Your Vision Week. During this time, I invite eye care professionals, teachers, 

members of the media, and all organizations dedicated to preserving eyesight 

to join in activities that will raise awareness of eye and vision health. 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with MISCELLANEOUS
12820 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 46 / Wednesday, March 9, 2011 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this fourth day 

of March, in the year of our Lord two thousand eleven, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-fifth. 

[FR Doc. 2011–5542 

Filed 3–8–11; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3195–W1–P 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with MISCELLANEOUSOB#1.EPS</GPH>
**Exhibit 31(a)****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**I, William L. Stakelin, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Regent Communications, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15-15(f)) for the registrant and we have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: March 17, 2008/s/ William L. Stakelin
§ 98.33 Ports designated for the importation of certain animal semen. ( a ) *Air and ocean ports.* The following air and ocean ports are designated as having inspection facilities for the entry of animal semen: Los Angeles, California; Miami, Florida; and Newburgh, New York.
( b ) *Canadian border ports.* The following land border ports are designated as having inspection facilities for the entry of animal semen from Canada: Eastport, Idaho; Houlton and Jackman, Maine; Detroit, Port Huron, and Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan; Baudette, Minnesota; Opheim, Raymond, and Sweetgrass, Montana; Alexandria Bay, Buffalo, and Champlain, New York; Dunseith, Pembina, and Portal, North Dakota; Derby Line and Highgate Springs, Vermont; Oroville and Sumas, Washington.
( c ) *Mexican border ports.* The following land border ports are designated as having inspection facilities for the entry of animal semen from Mexico: Douglas, Naco, Nogales, San Luis, and Sasabe, Arizona; Calexico and San Ysidro, California; Antelope Wells, Columbus, and Santa Teresa, New Mexico; Brownsville, Del Rio, Eagle Pass, El Paso, Hidalgo, Laredo, and Presidio, Texas.
( d ) *Limited ports.* The following limited ports are designated as having inspection facilities for the entry of animal semen: Anchorage and Fairbanks, Alaska; San Diego, California; Jacksonville, St. Petersburg-Clearwater, and Tampa, Florida; Atlanta, Georgia; Honolulu, Hawaii; Chicago, Illinois; New Orleans, Louisiana; Portland, Maine; Baltimore, Maryland; Boston, Massachusetts; International Falls and Minneapolis, Minnesota; Great Falls, Montana; Portland, Oregon; San Juan, Puerto Rico; Memphis, Tennessee; Galveston and Houston, Texas; Seattle, Spokane, and Tacoma, Washington.
( e ) *Designation of other ports.* The Secretary of the Treasury has approved the designation as quarantine stations of the ports specified in this section. In special cases other ports may be designated as quarantine stations under this section by the Administrator, with the concurrence of the Secretary of the Treasury.
[55 FR 31558, Aug. 2, 1990. Redesignated at 56 FR 55809, Oct. 30, 1991, and amended at 58 FR 37643, July 13, 1993; 60 FR 16045, Mar. 29, 1995; 60 FR 25120, May 11, 1995; 64 FR 23179, Apr. 30, 1999; 65 FR 38178, June 20, 2000; 67 FR 68022, Nov. 8, 2002]
### §1515. Records, etc., of bureaus transferred to Department of Commerce

The official records and papers on file in and pertaining exclusively to the business of any bureau, office, department, or branch of the public service transferred to the Department of Commerce, together with the furniture in use in such bureau, office, department, or branch of the public service, are transferred to the Department of Commerce.

(Feb. 14, 1903, ch. 552, §4 (part), 32 Stat. 826.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 598 of Title 5 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, by Pub. L. 89–554, §1, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 378.

Section is based on the second par. of section 4 of act Feb. 14, 1903. The first par. of section 4 is classified to sections 1511 and 1516 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Act Mar. 4, 1913, ch. 141, 37 Stat. 736, provided that the Department of Commerce and Labor and Secretary of Commerce and Labor were to be thereafter called the Department of Commerce and Secretary of Commerce and that the act creating the Department of Commerce and Labor (act Feb. 14, 1903) was amended accordingly.
§ 557.4 Imported fish and fish products; foreign certificates required. ( a ) Except as provided in § 557.16, each consignment containing any fish or fish products consigned to the United States from a foreign country must be accompanied by an electronic foreign inspection certificate or a paper foreign inspection certificate for fish and fish products. The certificate must have been issued by an official of the foreign government agency responsible for the inspection and certification.
( b ) An official of the foreign government must certify that any fish or fish product described on any official certificate was produced in accordance with the regulatory requirements in § 557.2.
( c ) The electronic foreign inspection certification must be in English, be transmitted directly to FSIS before the product's arrival at the official import inspection establishment, and be available to import inspection personnel.
( d ) The paper foreign inspection certificate must accompany each consignment; be submitted to import inspection personnel at the official import inspection establishment; be in English; bear the official seal of the foreign government responsible for the inspection of the product, and the name, title, and signature of the official authorized to issue inspection certificates for products imported to the United States.
( e ) The electronic foreign inspection certification and paper foreign inspection certificate must contain: ( 1 ) The date;
( 2 ) The foreign country of export and the producing foreign establishment number;
( 3 ) The species used to produce the product and the source country and foreign establishment number, if the source materials originate from a country other than the exporting country;
( 4 ) The product's description, including the process category, the product category, and the product group;
( 5 ) The name and address of the importer or consignee;
( 6 ) The name and address of the exporter or consignor;
( 7 ) The number of units (pieces or containers) and the shipping or identification;
( 8 ) The net weight of each lot;
( 9 ) Any additional information the Administrator requests to determine whether the product is eligible to be imported into the United States.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

VICTORY GARDENS, INC.

v.

WARRINGTON TOWNSHIP ZONING

HEARING BOARD AND WARRINGTON

TOWNSHIP

PETITION OF: WARRINGTON

TOWNSHIP :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 51 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Commonwealth

Court

VICTORY GARDENS, INC.

v.

WARRINGTON TOWNSHIP ZONING

HEARING BOARD AND WARRINGTON

TOWNSHIP

CROSS PETITION OF: FRANKLIN SHERMAN ACE, CONSTANCE SUSAN LARKEY ACE, TOMASO PAONE, TERESA M. PAONE, ANTONIO VERRILLO, ROSA VERRILLO, JOHN J. MCCONNELL, JR. &

KATHLEEN R. MCCONNELL :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 69 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Commonwealth

Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 7th day of July, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
### §§1861 to 1875. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections, Pub. L. 96–185, §§1–16, Jan. 7, 1980, 93 Stat. 1324, were omitted in view of the termination of authority to make commitments to guarantee or issue guarantees under this chapter on Dec. 31, 1983, pursuant to section 1875 of this title, and the total repayment of loans guaranteed under this chapter.

Section 1861 provided definitions for this chapter.

Section 1862 related to establishment and composition of Chrysler Corporation Loan Guarantee Board.

Section 1863 related to commitments for loan guarantees.

Section 1864 related to requirements of loan guarantees.

Section 1865 related to requirements applicable to employees.

Section 1866 related to employee stock ownership plan.

Section 1867 related to limitations on guarantee authority.

Section 1868 related to terms and conditions of loan guarantees.

Section 1869 related to inspection, audit, and investigation.

Section 1870 related to protection of Government's interest.

Section 1871 related to long-term planning study.

Section 1872 related to ineligibility of guaranteed loans for purchase by or sale or issuance to Federal Financing Bank or other Federal entity partly or wholly owned by United States.

Section 1873 related to reports to Congress.

Section 1874 related to authorization of appropriations.

Section 1875 provided that authority to make commitments to guarantee or to issue guarantees under this chapter expires on Dec. 31, 1983.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

RODNEY HITCHENS,

Defendant Below,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Plaintiff Below,

Appellee.

§

§ 

§ No. 95, 2019

§

§ Court Below—Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§ 

§ Cr. ID No. 86S10105DI (S)

§

§

§

 Submitted: April 25, 2019

 Decided: May 16, 2019

Before STRINE, Chief Justice; SEITZ and TRAYNOR, Justices.

ORDER

After careful consideration of the appellant’s opening brief, the appellee’s 

motion to affirm, and the record on appeal, we conclude that the judgment below 

should be affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court order, dated February 8, 2019, 

summarily dismissing the appellant’s sixth motion for postconviction relief.

1

 The 

Superior Court did not err in determining that the motion was procedurally barred 

and did not satisfy the pleading requirements of Superior Court Criminal Rule 

61(d)(2). 

 

1

State v. Hitchens, 2019 WL 494676 (Del. Super. Ct. Feb. 8, 2019).
2

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that motion to affirm is GRANTED 

and the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gary F. Traynor

Justice
# C_2011072EN.01001902.xml

| 5.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/19

---

Action brought on 21 December 2010 — Commission v Commune de Millau

(Case T-572/10)

2011/C 72/33

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: S. Petrova, Agent, and E. Bouttier, avocat)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commune de Millau (Millau, France)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | declare that the Commune de Millau (municipality of Millau) is jointly and severally liable for the undertakings made by, and the debts of, the Société d’économie mixte d’équipement de l’Aveyron (the Aveyron semi-public installations company) (SEMEA) with respect to the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that the Commune de Millau (municipality of Millau) is jointly and severally liable for the undertakings made by, and the debts of, the Société d’économie mixte d’équipement de l’Aveyron (the Aveyron semi-public installations company) (SEMEA) with respect to the European Commission;

| — | order the Commune de Millau to pay jointly and severally with SEMEA to the applicant the principal sum of EUR 41 012, plus interest outstanding since 10 March 1992 or, in the alternative, from 27 April 1993; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commune de Millau to pay jointly and severally with SEMEA to the applicant the principal sum of EUR 41 012, plus interest outstanding since 10 March 1992 or, in the alternative, from 27 April 1993;

| — | order the capitalisation of interest; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the capitalisation of interest;

| — | order the Commune de Millau to pay jointly and severally with SEMEA the sum of EUR 5 000 in respect of SEMEA's wrongful obstruction of legal process; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commune de Millau to pay jointly and severally with SEMEA the sum of EUR 5 000 in respect of SEMEA's wrongful obstruction of legal process;

| — | order the Commune de Millau to pay jointly and severally with SEMEA the costs of the present case; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commune de Millau to pay jointly and severally with SEMEA the costs of the present case;

| — | order the joining of the present case with Case T-168/10 Commission v SEMEA |
| --- | --- |

—

order the joining of the present case with Case T-168/10 Commission v SEMEA

Commission

SEMEA

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments put forward by the applicant are identical to those advanced in Case T-168/10 Commission v SEMEA, (1) the Commission claiming furthermore that the Commune de Millau is jointly and severally liable for repayment of SEMEA's debt, in so far as the Commune de Millau took over SEMEA's assets and liabilities, including the contract concluded between SEMEA and the Commission which forms the basis of the dispute.

Commission

SEMEA

1

---

(1)  OJ 2010 C 161, p. 48.

1

---
§ 2.4 Merit system principles. ( a ) Merit personnel systems are based on the principle that an organization is best served by motivated, competent, honest and productive workers. In a merit system, employees are hired, promoted, rewarded, and retained on the basis of individual ability and fitness for employment without regard to race, color, sex, religion, age, or national origin. Central to this principle is the protection of employees from discrimination, improper political influence and personal favoritism.
( b ) Equal employment opportunity is an integral part of every merit system. Affirmative action plans, designed to provide a work force reflective of the Nation's diversity, must assure that both in operation and results the merit system reflects equal opportunity at every step of the personnel process.
( c ) GAO personnel systems shall embody the following merit system principles: ( 1 ) Recruitment should be from qualified individuals from appropriate sources in an endeavor to achieve a work force from all segments of society, and selection and advancement should be determined solely on the basis of relative ability, knowledge, and skills, after fair and open competition which assures that all receive equal opportunity.
( 2 ) All employees and applicants for employment should receive fair and equitable treatment in all aspects of personnel management without regard to political affiliation, race, color, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, age, or handicapping condition, and with proper regard for their privacy and constitutional rights.
( 3 ) Equal pay should be provided for work of substantially equal value, with appropriate consideration of both national and local rates paid by employers in the private sector, and appropriate incentives and recognition should be provided for excellence in performance.
( 4 ) All employees should maintain high standards of integrity, conduct, and concern for the public interest.
( 5 ) The work force should be used efficiently and effectively.
( 6 ) Employees should be retained on the basis of the adequacy of their performance, inadequate performance should be corrected, and employees should be separated who cannot or will not improve their performance to meet required standards.
( 7 ) Employees should be provided effective education and training in cases in which such education and training would result in better organizational and individual performance.
( 8 ) Employees should be protected against arbitrary action, personal favoritism, or coercion from partisan political purposes and prohibited from using their official authority or influence for the purpose of interfering with or affecting the results of an election or a nomination for election.
( 9 ) Employees should be protected against reprisal for the lawful disclosure of information which the employee reasonably believes evidences: a violation of any law, rule or regulation; or mismanagement, a gross waste of funds, an abuse of authority, or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety.
### §2318. Aviation cadets; benefits

Except as provided in section 402(c) of title 37, aviation cadets or their beneficiaries are entitled to the same allowances, pensions, gratuities, and other benefits as are provided for enlisted members in pay grade E–4. While on active duty, an aviation cadet is entitled to uniforms, clothing, and equipment at the expense of the United States.

(Added Pub. L. 89–444, §1(20), June 9, 1966, 80 Stat. 197, §372; renumbered §2318, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §113(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4221.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 372 of this title as this section.
All Quarterly Reports to the Court can be found here: ~\netsite-docs\lps24426\lps24426\www.doi.gov\ost\trust_documents\uploa
d.