alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 28
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear at 76 FR 76873, Dec. 9, 2011.

§ 28.123 Standards of conduct for labor organizations. ( a ) The GAO shall only accord recognition to labor organizations that are free from corrupt influences and from influences opposed to basic democratic principles. An organization is not required to prove it is free from such influence if it is subject to governing requirements calling for the maintenance of: ( 1 ) Democratic procedures;
( 2 ) Freedom from totalitarian influence;
( 3 ) Independence on the part of its agents and officers from any business or financial interests which represent conflicts of interest or potential conflicts of interest; and
( 4 ) Fiscal integrity.
( b ) A labor organization which has or seeks recognition as a representative of employees under this chapter shall file financial and other reports with the Board and comply with trusteeship and election standards.
( c ) A labor organization which has or seeks recognition under these Rules shall adhere to principles enunciated in the Regulations issued by the Assistant Secretary of Labor for Employment Standards regarding standards of conduct for labor organizations in the public sector. Complaints of violations of this section shall be filed with the Board. In any matter arising under this section, the Board may require a labor organization to cease and desist from violations of this section and require it to take such actions as it considers appropriate to carry out the policies of this section.
( d ) This chapter does not authorize participation in the management of a labor organization or acting as a representative of a labor organization by a management official, a supervisor, or a confidential employee, or by any employee if the participation or activity would result in a conflict or apparent conflict of interest or would otherwise be incompatible with law or with the official duties of the employee.
( e ) In the case of any labor organization which by omission or commission has willfully and intentionally called or participated in a strike, work stoppage or slowdown, or picketed in a manner which interfered with the operations of a government agency, or has condoned such activity, the Board shall, upon an appropriate finding it has made of such a violation— ( 1 ) Revoke the recognition status of the labor organization; or
( 2 ) Take any other appropriate disciplinary action.
( f ) The General Counsel may charge a labor organization with violations of this section. The Board shall conduct proceedings with regard to such charge and may require a labor organization to take such actions as it deems necessary to carry out the policies of this section.
[58 FR 61992, Nov. 23, 1993, as amended at 68 FR 69303, Dec. 12, 2003]
# C_2014142EN.01003001.xml

| 12.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 142/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 142/30

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 March 2014 — Faci v Commission

(Case T-46/10) (1)

1

((Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - European markets in ESBO/esters heat stabilisers - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement - Fixing prices, allocating markets and customers and exchanging commercially sensitive information - Proof of one aspect of the infringement - Fines - Equal treatment - Good administration - Reasonable time - Proportionality))

2014/C 142/37

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Faci SpA (Milan, Italy) (represented by: S. Piccardo, lawyer, S. Crosby, Solicitor, and S. Santoro, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially by K. Mojzesowicz, F. Ronkes Agerbeek and J. Bourke, subsequently by F. Ronkes Agerbeek, J. Bourke and F. Castilla Contreras and lastly by F. Ronkes Agerbeek, F. Castilla Contreras and R. Sauer, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 8682 final of 11 November 2009 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38589 — Heat Stabilisers), or, in the alternative, for annulment of the fine imposed on the applicant or a reduction in its amount.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Faci SpA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Faci SpA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 100, 17.4.2010.

1

---
§ 500.3 Withholding action or suspension without prior notification. ( a ) FSIS may take a withholding action or impose a suspension without providing the establishment prior notification because: ( 1 ) The establishment produced and shipped adulterated or misbranded product as defined in 21 U.S.C. 453, 21 U.S.C. 602, or 21 U.S.C. 1033;
( 2 ) The establishment does not have a HACCP plan as specified in § 417.2 of this chapter;
( 3 ) The establishment does not have Sanitation Standard Operating Procedures as specified in §§ 416.11-416.12 of this chapter;
( 4 ) Sanitary conditions are such that products in the establishment are or would be rendered adulterated;
( 5 ) The establishment violated the terms of a regulatory control action;
( 6 ) An establishment operator, officer, employee, or agent assaulted, threatened to assault, intimidated, or interfered with an FSIS employee; or
( 7 ) The establishment did not destroy a condemned meat or poultry carcass, or part or product thereof, or egg product, that has been found to be adulterated and that has not been reprocessed, in accordance with part 314 or part 381, subpart L, or part 590 of this chapter within three days of notification.
( b ) FSIS also may impose a suspension without providing the establishment prior notification because the establishment is handling or slaughtering animals inhumanely.
[64 FR 66546, Nov. 29, 1999, as amended at 85 FR 68673, Oct. 29, 2020; 85 FR 81340, Dec. 16, 2020]
§ 311.25 Parasites not transmissible to man; tapeworm cysts in sheep; hydatid cysts; flukes; gid bladder-worms. ( a ) In the disposal of carcasses, edible organs, and other parts of carcasses showing evidence of infestation with parasites not transmissible to man, the following general rules shall govern except as otherwise provided in this section: If the lesions are localized in such manner and are of such character that the parasites and the lesions caused by them can be completely removed, the nonaffected portion of the carcass, organ, or other part of the carcass may be passed for human food after the removal and condemnation of the affected portions. If an organ or other part of a carcass shows numerous lesions caused by parasites, or if the character of the infestation is such that complete extirpation of the parasitic infestation or invasion renders the part in any way unfit for human food, the affected part shall be condemned. If parasites are found to be distributed in a carcass in such a manner or to be of such character that their removal and the removal of the lesions caused by them is impracticable, no part of the carcass shall be passed for human food. If the infestation is excessive, the carcass shall be condemned. If the infestation is moderate, the carcass may be passed for cooking, but in case such carcass is not cooked as required by part 315 of this subchapter, it shall be condemned.
( b ) In the case of sheep carcasses affected with tapeworm cysts (Cysticercus ovis, so-called sheep measles, not transmissible to man), such carcasses may be passed for human food after the removal and condemnation of the affected portions: *Provided, however,* That if, upon the final inspection of sheep carcasses retained on account of measles, the total number of cysts found embedded in muscular tissue, or in immediate relation with muscular tissue, excluding the heart, exceeds five, the entire carcass shall be condemned, or such carcass shall be heated throughout to a temperature of at least 140 °F. After removal and condemnation of all affected portions.
( c ) Carcasses found infested with gid bladder-worms (Coenurus cerebralis, Multiceps multiceps) may be passed for human food after condemnation of the affected organ (brain or spinal cord).
( d ) Organs or other parts of carcasses infested with hydatid cysts (echinococus) shall be condemned.
( e ) Livers infested with flukes or fringed tapeworms shall be condemned.
#### § 93.211 Quarantine stations, visiting restricted; sales prohibited.

Visitors shall not be admitted to the quarantine enclosure during any time that poultry are in quarantine except that an importer (or his or her accredited agent or veterinarian) may be admitted to the yards and buildings containing his or her quarantined poultry at such intervals as may be deemed necessary, and under such conditions and restrictions as may be imposed, by the inspector in charge of the quarantine station. On the last day of the quarantine period, owners, officers or registry societies, and others having official business or whose services may be necessary in the removal of the poultry may be admitted upon written permission from the said inspector. No exhibition or sale shall be allowed within the quarantine grounds.
### §2225a. Prohibiting Federal funding of conferences held at non-certified places of public accommodation

#### (a) In general

No Federal funds may be used to sponsor or fund in whole or in part a meeting, convention, conference, or training seminar that is conducted in, or that otherwise uses the rooms, facilities, or services of, a place of public accommodation that does not meet the requirements of the fire prevention and control guidelines described in section 2225 of this title.

#### (b) Waiver

#### (1) In general

The head of an agency of the Federal Government sponsoring or funding a particular meeting, convention, conference, or training seminar may waive the prohibition described in subsection (a) if the head of such agency determines that a waiver of such prohibition is necessary in the public interest in the case of such particular event.

#### (2) Delegation of authority

The head of an agency of the Federal Government may delegate the authority provided under paragraph (1) to waive the prohibition described in subsection (a) and to determine whether such a waiver is necessary in the public interest to an officer or employee of the agency if such officer or employee is given such authority with respect to all meetings, conventions, conferences, and training seminars sponsored or funded by the agency.

#### (c) Notice requirements

#### (1) Advertisements and applications

(A) Any advertisement for or application for attendance at a meeting, convention, conference, or training seminar sponsored or funded in whole or in part by the Federal Government shall include a notice regarding the prohibition described in subsection (a).

(B) The requirement described in subparagraph (A) shall not apply in the case of an event for which a head of an agency of the Federal Government, pursuant to subsection (b), waives the prohibition described in subsection (a).

#### (2) Providing notice to recipients of funds

(A) Each Executive department, Government corporation, and independent establishment providing Federal funds to non-Federal entities shall notify recipients of such funds of the prohibition described in subsection (a).

(B) In subparagraph (A), the terms "Executive department", "Government corporation", and "independent establishment" have the meanings given such terms in chapter 1 of title 5.

#### (d) Effective date

The provisions of this section shall take effect on the first day of the first fiscal year that begins after the expiration of the 425-day period that begins on the date of the publication in the Federal Register of the master list referred to in section 2224(b) of this title.

(Pub. L. 101–391, §6, Sept. 25, 1990, 104 Stat. 751.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Hotel and Motel Fire Safety Act of 1990, and not as part of the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act of 1974 which comprises this chapter.
### §1693. Congressional findings and declaration of purpose

#### (a) Rights and liabilities undefined

The Congress finds that the use of electronic systems to transfer funds provides the potential for substantial benefits to consumers. However, due to the unique characteristics of such systems, the application of existing consumer protection legislation is unclear, leaving the rights and liabilities of consumers, financial institutions, and intermediaries in electronic fund transfers undefined.

#### (b) Purposes

It is the purpose of this subchapter to provide a basic framework establishing the rights, liabilities, and responsibilities of participants in electronic fund and remittance transfer systems. The primary objective of this subchapter, however, is the provision of individual consumer rights.

(Pub. L. 90–321, title IX, §902, as added Pub. L. 95–630, title XX, §2001, Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3728; amended Pub. L. 111–203, title X, §1073(a)(1), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 2060.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2010—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 111–203 inserted "and remittance" after "electronic fund".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2010 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 111–203 effective 1 day after July 21, 2010, except as otherwise provided, see section 4 of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as an Effective Date note under section 5301 of Title 12, Banks and Banking.

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 90–321, title IX, §923, formerly §921, as added by Pub. L. 95–630, title XX, §2001, Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3741, renumbered §922, Pub. L. 111–24, title IV, §401(1), May 22, 2009, 123 Stat. 1751; renumbered §923, Pub. L. 111–203, title X, §1073(a)(3), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 2060, provided that: "This title [enacting this subchapter] takes effect upon the expiration of eighteen months from the date of its enactment [Nov. 10, 1978], except that sections 909 and 911 [sections 1693g, 1693i of this title] take effect upon the expiration of ninety days after the date of enactment."

[Pub. L. 111–203, §1073(a)(3), which directed renumbering of section 922 of Pub. L. 90–321 as section 923 effective 1 day after July 21, 2010, was executed after the renumbering of section 921 of Pub. L. 90–321 as section 922 by Pub. L. 111–24, §401(1), effective 15 months after May 22, 2009, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.]

#### Short Title

This subchapter known as the "Electronic Fund Transfer Act", see Short Title note set out under section 1601 of this title.
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Cambridge Heart, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended December 31,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Robert B. Palardy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|Dated: April 29, 2003 |  | /s/ROBERT B. PALARDYRobert B. Palardy
Chief Financial Officer
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
No. ___________

In the

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

______________________________________

On Appeal from the 400th Judicial District Court of

Fort Bend County, Texas, Cause Number 11-DCR-59007A; 

and the Opinion of the Fourteenth Court of Appeals

in Cause Number 14-14-00272-CR, Delivered October 15, 2015

______________________________________

JEREMY PATRICK SHAKESNIDER

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

_____________________________________

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

PRO SE PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

______________________________

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF THE COURT OF CRIMINAL 

APPEALS:

COMES NOW, Michael Elliott, the undersigned attorney of record for 

Jeremy Patrick Shakesnider, the Appellant, herein, and files this Motion for 

Extension of Time to File Pro Se Petition for Discretionary Review. As set out 

below, the undersigned respectfully requests a thirty-day extension so that 

Appellant can file his Pro Se Petition for Discretionary Review. In support of 

said motion, the undersigned would show the Court the following:

1. Appellant’s Petition for Discretionary Review is currently due in this 

case on November 14, 2015.

PD-1393-15

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

Transmitted 10/27/2015 2:48:15 PM

Accepted 10/27/2015 5:15:06 PM

ABEL ACOSTA

CLERK
2. Appellant seeks an extension of thirty days in which to file his 

Petition for Discretionary Review, making his Petition due on or before December 

14, 2015.

3. The undersigned counsel will not be representing Appellant after the 

filing of this motion. Appellant will now have to obtain and review the record in 

order to prepare and file a Pro Se Petition for Discretionary Review. The 

undersigned believes that there is insufficient time between now and November 15, 

2015, to accomplish those goals. Consequently, the undersigned respectfully 

requests that the Court grant Appellant the additional time.

4. The undersigned has not filed any previous motions for extension of 

time in this case.

5. For the reasons set forth above, the undersigned respectfully requests 

that Appellant be granted an extension of thirty days so that his brief in this case 

will now be due on December 15, 2015.

PRAYER

 WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the undersigned

respectfully requests that this Court grant this Motion for Extension of Time to File 

Pro Se Petition for Discretionary Review.

Respectfully submitted,

_______/s/__Michael Elliott______

Michael Elliott

State Bar Number 06546540

905 Front Street

Richmond, Texas 77469

(832) 496-5000

(281) 232-8141 (fax)

mike@elliottslaw.com
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time has been mailed to the Fort 

Bend County District Attorney’s 301 Jackson Street, Richmond, Texas 77469 on 

October 27, 2015.

__/s/ Mike Elliott__________________

Mike Elliott
# C_2007095EN.01003002.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/30

---

Action brought on 27 February 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Finland

(Case C-118/07)

(2007/C 95/57)

Language of the case: Finnish

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by M. Huttunen, H. Støvlbæk and B. Martenczuk, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Finland

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by failing to take the appropriate steps in accordance with the second paragraph of Article 307 EC to eliminate the incompatibilities relating to provisions on transfers in the international investment agreements concluded between it and the Russian Federation (the former Soviet Union), Belarus, China, Malaysia, Sri Lanka and Uzbekistan, the Republic of Finland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 307 EC; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to take the appropriate steps in accordance with the second paragraph of Article 307 EC to eliminate the incompatibilities relating to provisions on transfers in the international investment agreements concluded between it and the Russian Federation (the former Soviet Union), Belarus, China, Malaysia, Sri Lanka and Uzbekistan, the Republic of Finland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 307 EC;

| — | order the Republic of Finland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Republic of Finland to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The present case concerns international investment agreements made by the Republic of Finland with the Russian Federation, Belarus, China, Malaysia, Sri Lanka and Uzbekistan before it acceded to the European Union. Provisions contained in those agreements concern the transfer of capital and payments in connection with investments. The Commission submits that those provisions in the agreements are incompatible with Community law, since as a result of those provisions Finland is unable to comply with measures taken by the EC institutions under Articles 57(2) EC, 59 EC and 60(1) EC. Since the agreements in question were made before Finland's accession to the EU, Finland is obliged to take all appropriate steps to eliminate the incompatibilities in the agreements in accordance with the second paragraph of Article 307 EC.

---
#### § 416.6 Tagging insanitary equipment, utensils, rooms or compartments.

When an FSIS program employee finds that any equipment, utensil, room, or compartment at an official establishment is insanitary or that its use could cause the adulteration of product, he will attach to it a “U.S. Rejected” tag. Equipment, utensils, rooms, or compartments so tagged cannot be used until made acceptable. Only an FSIS program employee may remove a “U.S. Rejected” tag.

[64 FR 56417, Oct. 20, 1999]
EXHIBIT 23


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (Nos. 333-92326, 333-117148 and 333-118728) of Motient Corporation and
Subsidiaries of our report dated April 29, 2005, with respect to Motient
Corporation's management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting, which report is included in this amended annual report on
Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 of Motient Corporation and Subsidiaries for the year
ended December 31, 2004.

/s/ Friedman LLP

East Hanover, New Jersey
April 29, 2005
#### § 1308.1 Purpose and organization.

The regulations in this part implement the Contract Disputes Act of 1978 as it relates to TVA. This part consists of 5 subparts. Subpart A deals with matters applicable throughout the part, incuding definitions. Subpart B deals with Contracting Officers' decisions. Subpart C deals with general matters concerning the TVA Board of Contract Appeals. Subpart D deals with hearing and prehearing procedures, including discovery. Subpart E deals with subpoenas.
§ 96.9 Casings admitted on disinfection; sealing; transfer and disinfection. Foreign animal casings offered for importation into the United States which are admitted upon disinfection shall be handled as follows: ( a ) The containers of such casings shall be sealed on the steamship pier or other place of first arrival. Four seals shall be affixed to both ends of each tierce, barrel, and similar container in the space where the ends of the container enter the staves, by means of red sealing wax imprinted with the No. 3 Veterinary Services brass brand from which “insp'd & p's'd” and the establishment number have been removed.
( b ) Uncertified animal casings sealed as above indicated shall be transferred from the steamship pier or other place of first arrival to the premises of the importer or other designated place, where they shall be disinfected by the importer under the supervision of an APHIS inspector before they are offered for sale. The object of this ruling is to place full responsibility for disinfection of casings on the original importer and to prevent the sale of casings subject to disinfection by the purchaser.
[28 FR 5986, June 13, 1963, as amended at 57 FR 29785, July 7, 1992. Redesignated at 58 FR 47031, Sept. 7, 1993]