alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 154.303 Test periods. Statements A through M, O, P, and supporting schedules, in § 154.312 and § 154.313, must be based upon a test period. ( a ) If the natural gas company has been in operation for 12 months on the filing date, then the test period consists of a base period followed by an adjustment period. ( 1 ) The base period consists of 12 consecutive months of the most recently available actual experience. The last day of the base period may not be more than 4 months prior to the filing date.
( 2 ) The adjustment period is a period of up to 9 months immediately following the base period.
( 3 ) The test period may not extend more than 9 months beyond the filing date.
( 4 ) The rate factors (volumes, costs, and billing determinants) established during the base period may be adjusted for changes in revenues and costs which are known and measurable with reasonable accuracy at the time of the filing and which will become effective within the adjustment period. The base period factors must be adjusted to eliminate nonrecurring items. The company may adjust its base period factors to normalize items eliminated as nonrecurring.
( b ) If the natural gas company has not been in operation for 12 months on the filing date, then the test period must consist of 12 consecutive months ending not more than one year after the filing date. Rate factors may be adjusted as in paragraph (a)(4) of this section but must not be adjusted for occurrences anticipated after the 12-month period.
( c ) ( 1 ) Adjustments to base period experience, or to estimates where 12 months' experience is not available, may include the costs for facilities for which either a permanent or temporary certificate has been granted, provided such facilities will be in service within the test period; or a certificate application is pending. The filing must identify facilities, related costs and the docket number of each such outstanding certificate. Subject to paragraph (c)(2) of this section, adjustments to base period experience, or to estimates where 12 months' experience is not available, may include any amounts for facilities that require a certificate of public convenience and necessity, where a certificate has not been issued by the filing date but is expected to be issued before the end of the test period. Adjustments to base period may include costs for facilities that do not require a certificate and are in service by the end of the test period.
( 2 ) When a pipeline files a motion to place the rates into effect, the filing must be revised to exclude the costs associated with any facilities that will not be in service as of the end of the test period, or for which certificate authorization is required but will not be granted as of the end of the test period. At the end of the test period, the pipeline must remove from its rates costs associated with any facility that is not in service or for which certificate authority is required but has not been granted.
( d ) The Commission may allow reasonable deviation from the prescribed test period.
[Order 582, 60 FR 52996, Oct. 11, 1995, as amended by Order 582-A, 61 FR 9629, Mar. 11, 1996]
#### § 319.720 Meat extract.

Meat extract (e.g., “Beef Extract”) shall contain not more than 25 percent of moisture.
§ 1308.31 Filing and service. ( a ) All documents required to be served shall be served on TVA and Contractor and filed with the Board, except subpoenas.
( b ) A request under § 1308.15 shall be directed to the General Manager, Tennessee Valley Authority, 400 Commerce Avenue, Knoxville, Tennessee 37902, and shall be transmitted to the Chairman.
( c ) All other documents required to be filed shall be directed to the Hearing Officer assigned to the matter.
( d ) Service on the opposing party may be made personally or by mail. The copy presented for filing shall bear an appropriate certificate or acknowledgment of service.
### §§223, 224. Repealed. Pub. L. 110–69, title III, §3013(c)(2), Aug. 9, 2007, 121 Stat. 598

Section 223, acts July 21, 1950, ch. 484, §§1–11, 64 Stat. 369; Pub. L. 88–165, Nov. 4, 1963, 77 Stat. 299, related to units of electrical measure.

Section 224, act July 21, 1950, ch. 484, §12, 64 Stat. 370, related to establishment of values of primary electric and photometric units in absolute measure and legal values for those units.
Exhibit 32

Certification

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Inland Monthly Income Fund II, L.P. (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;

(2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(3) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inland Monthly Income Fund II, L.P.

 

By: Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation     General Partner

/S/ Kelly Tucek____________________________________

Name: Kelly TucekTitle: Assistant Vice President of the General Partner and        Principal Financial Officer of Inland Monthly Income Fund II, L.P.

Date: August 11, 2003
### §1665c. Interest rate reduction on open end consumer credit plans

#### (a) In general

If a creditor increases the annual percentage rate applicable to a credit card account under an open end consumer credit plan, based on factors including the credit risk of the obligor, market conditions, or other factors, the creditor shall consider changes in such factors in subsequently determining whether to reduce the annual percentage rate for such obligor.

#### (b) Requirements

With respect to any credit card account under an open end consumer credit plan, the creditor shall—

(1) maintain reasonable methodologies for assessing the factors described in subsection (a);

(2) not less frequently than once every 6 months, review accounts as to which the annual percentage rate has been increased since January 1, 2009, to assess whether such factors have changed (including whether any risk has declined);

(3) reduce the annual percentage rate previously increased when a reduction is indicated by the review; and

(4) in the event of an increase in the annual percentage rate, provide in the written notice required under section 1637(i) of this title a statement of the reasons for the increase.

#### (c) Rule of construction

This section shall not be construed to require a reduction in any specific amount.

#### (d) Rulemaking

The Bureau 1 shall issue final rules not later than 9 months after May 22, 2009, to implement the requirements of and evaluate compliance with this section, and subsections (a), (b), and (c) shall become effective 15 months after May 22, 2009.

(Pub. L. 90–321, title I, §148, as added Pub. L. 111–24, title I, §101(c), May 22, 2009, 123 Stat. 1737; amended Pub. L. 111–203, title X, §1100A(2), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 2107.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2010—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 111–203 substituted "Bureau" for "Board".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2010 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 111–203 effective on the designated transfer date, see section 1100H of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as a note under section 552a of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### Effective Date

Section effective 9 months after May 22, 2009, except as otherwise specifically provided, see section 3 of Pub. L. 111–24, set out as an Effective Date of 2009 Amendment note under section 1602 of this title.

1 So in original. Probably should be "Board".
### §2614. Prohibited acts

It shall be unlawful for any person to—

(1) fail or refuse to comply with any requirement of this subchapter or any rule promulgated, order issued, or consent agreement entered into under this subchapter, or any requirement of subchapter II or any rule promulgated or order issued under subchapter II;

(2) use for commercial purposes a chemical substance or mixture which such person knew or had reason to know was manufactured, processed, or distributed in commerce in violation of section 2604 or 2605 of this title, a rule or order under section 2604 or 2605 of this title, or an order issued in action brought under section 2604 or 2606 of this title;

(3) fail or refuse to (A) establish or maintain records, (B) submit reports, notices, or other information, or (C) permit access to or copying of records, as required by this chapter or a rule thereunder; or

(4) fail or refuse to permit entry or inspection as required by section 2610 of this title.

(Pub. L. 94–469, title I, §15, Oct. 11, 1976, 90 Stat. 2036; renumbered title I and amended Pub. L. 99–519, §3(b)(1), (c)(1), Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2988, 2989; Pub. L. 114–182, title I, §19(l), June 22, 2016, 130 Stat. 508.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2016—Par. (1). Pub. L. 114–182 substituted "any requirement of this subchapter or any rule promulgated, order issued, or consent agreement entered into under this subchapter, or" for "(A) any rule promulgated or order issued under section 2603 of this title, (B) any requirement prescribed by section 2604 or 2605 of this title, (C) any rule promulgated or order issued under section 2604 or 2605 of this title, or (D)".

1986—Par. (1)(D). Pub. L. 99–519 added cl. (D).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1977, see section 31 of Pub. L. 94–469, set out as a note under section 2601 of this title.
#### Deeb Lutfy, Appellant, v. Shakir Nassar, Respondent, Impleaded with Nicola Abo-Samrah and Salim H. Kisbany, Defendants. Joseph H. Macksoud and George A. Ferris, Appellants.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Woodward, Jenks, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000913496
<NAME>                        WNC HOUSING TAX CREDIT FUND IV, L.P. - SERIES 1
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                             310,214
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   310,214
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,867,520
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,760,624
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,867,520
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    15,541
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       94,675
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   693,836
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (772,970)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (772,970)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (772,970)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (76.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0



</TABLE>
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2
                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



The Board of Directors
XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 33-72852, 33-34250, 33-91714, 333-30099, 333-53253, 333-71423, 333-81459,
333-84391, 333-88807, 333-40566, and 333-42104) on Forms S-3 and S-8 of Motient
Corporation of our report dated January 23, 2002, with respect to the
consolidated balance sheets of XM Satellite Holdings Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2000 and 2001 and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 2001, which report appears in the
December 31, 2001 annual report on Form 10-K of Motient Corporation.

Our report, dated January 23, 2002 contains an explanatory paragraph that states
that the XM Satellite Radio Holding Inc. and subsidiaries is dependent upon
additional debt or equity financing, which raises substantial doubt about its
ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do
not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of that
uncertainty.

                                    /s/KPMG LLP


McLean, Virginia
March 27, 2002
# C_2013252EN.01001101.xml

| 31.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/11

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 June 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Wien — Austria) — Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde v Donau Chemie AG, Donauchem GmbH, DC Druck-Chemie Süd GmbH & Co KG, Brenntag Austria Holding GmbH, Brenntag CEE GmbH, ASK Chemicals GmbH, formerly Ashland-Südchemie-Kernfest GmbH, ASK Chemicals Austria GmbH, formerly Ashland Südchemie Hantos GmbH

(Case C-536/11) (1)

1

(Competition - Access to the file - Judicial proceedings relating to fines for infringement of Article 101 TFEU - Third-party undertakings wishing to bring an action for damages - National rules making access to the file subject to the consent of all parties to the proceedings - Principle of effectiveness)

2013/C 252/16

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Oberlandesgericht Wien

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde

Applicant:

Defendants: Donau Chemie AG, Donauchem GmbH, DC Druck-Chemie Süd GmbH & Co KG, Brenntag Austria Holding GmbH, Brenntag CEE GmbH, ASK Chemicals GmbH, formerly Ashland-Südchemie-Kernfest GmbH, ASK Chemicals Austria GmbH, formerly Ashland Südchemie Hantos GmbH

Defendants:

In the presence of: Bundeskartellamt, Verband Druck und Medientechnik

In the presence of:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Oberlandesgericht Wien — Interpretation of provisions of European Union law relating to cartels — Access to the file — National legislation whereby, in administrative proceedings relating to competition, access to the file by third parties is subject to the consent of all parties to the proceedings and there is no weighing of all competing interests, whereas such weighing does take place in respect of access to the file in comparable civil and criminal proceedings

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

European Union law, in particular the principle of effectiveness, precludes a provision of national law under which access to documents forming part of the file relating to national proceedings concerning the application of Article 101 TFEU, including access to documents made available under a leniency programme, by third parties who are not party to those proceedings with a view to bringing an action for damages against participants in an agreement or concerted practice is made subject solely to the consent of all the parties to those proceedings, without leaving any possibility for the national courts of weighing up the interests involved.

---

(1)  OJ C 13, 14.1.2012.

1

---
**Exhibit 31.1** **Chief    Executive Officer Certification**     I, John G. Duffy, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on    Form 10-Q    for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 of KBW, Inc. (the    “Registrant”);     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this report, fairly    present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of,    and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are    responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls    and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this report is    being prepared;     b) [Intentionally omitted.]     c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and     d) Disclosed in this report any change in the    Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter    that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to    materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over    financial reporting; and     5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board of    directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal control over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: November 13, 2007 /s/  JOHN    G. DUFFY    John G. Duffy    Chief Executive Officer
p. 1



# OAR Box 1787 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 11) ll-C-3 5
Docket Number: 

# A-90-3 7

Printed 11/4/2008 10:22:19 AM

Sheet 77 of 147P. 2

'% 

# 15S B

^ UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N AGENCY

Offic e o f Ai rQualityPlannin g an d Standard s Researc h Triangl e Park , Nort h Carolin a 2771 1 

# A-fO-sy JJ 

# -C-3S

1 3 JU M 198

9

Mr . Henr y

V . Nicke l Hunto nan

d William s Pos t Offic e Bo x1923 0 Washington , D.C . 2003 6 Dea rMr

. Nickel : 

## M 

## 2 5

X- »•" * "i^r»ti , » L'
- ^ v IL | " | "*

—|

— rrwr r rwn i ni c 'in . •, '

. * Thi s i s i

n respons e t o you r Ma y 11 , 198 9 lette r t o Administrato r Willia m Reill y regardin g th e developmen t o f implementatio nguidanc e fo r th e Environmenta l Protectio nAgency' s (EPA's ) "top-down " proces s fo r determinin g bes t availabl e contro l technolog y (BACT) . Specifically , yo u wis ht o be kep t apprise d o f an

y actio nEP A

take s i n respons e t o th e America nPape r Institut e (API ) an d th e Nationa l Fores t Product s Associatio n(NFPA ) petitio nrequestin g EPA t o immediatel y

rescin d it s polic y

regardin g th e top-downproces s and tak e certai nothe r administrativ e actions . OnMa y 12 , 1989 , EPA

issue d a respons e denyin g th e API/NFP A petitio non th e ground s tha t th e top-dow nBAC T proces s i s neithe r a t varianc e wit hth e statutor y

definitio nno r doe s i t constitut e a revisio nt o th e preventio no f significan t deterioratio nregulations . A cop y o f th e respons e i s enclosed . Th e EPA ha s prepare d (i n draf t form ) a separat e summar y o f th e top-dow

n process . Th e summar y i s currentl y

unde r revie w

b y th e EP A

Regiona l Office s an d representative s o f Stat e an d loca l ai r pollutio ncontro l agencies . A backgroun d statemen t on top-dow nBACT , discussin g th e origin s o f an d rational e fo r th e polic y

initiative , ha s als o bee nprepare d b y EPA . Bot ho f thes e document s hav e bee ntransmitte d t o API/NFPA , an d a copy o f eac hi s enclosed . A s requested , w e wil l kee p yo u apprise d o f an y subsequen t actio nEPA take s i n regar d t o th e API/NFP A petition .

JohnCalcagn i

Directo r .irX)ualit y Managemen t D i Enclosure sP. 3



### Fo r enclosure s t o docket

itemII-C-7 , Jun e 13 , 198 9 lette r fro mJoh n Calcagni t o Henr

y V

. Nickel , se e docket

item s indicated

. II-C- 3 Ma

y 12 , 198 9 respons e denyin g th e API/NFPA petition

. II-C- 4 Ma

y 25 , 198 9 'Draf

t "Top-Down " Bes t

Availabl e Contro l Technology : A Summary ' II-B-1 5 "Backgroun dStatement on th e EPA' s Top-Dow n Policy "
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

 

**Independent Auditors’ Consent**

 

 

The Board of Directors 

CellStar Corporation: 

 

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-87754, 333-23381, 333-77415 and 333-89298) of CellStar Corporation of ourreport dated January 10, 2003, except for the fourth paragraph of note 6, which is as of February 28, 2003, and note 23, which is as of January 31, 2003, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of CellStar Corporation and subsidiaries as ofNovember 30, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended November 30, 2002, and the relatedschedule, which report appears in the November 30, 2002 annual report on on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 3 of CellStar Corporation. 

 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

 

KPMG LLP 

 

 

Dallas, Texas

July 2, 2003
The webpage cannot be found HTTP       404                           Most likely causes:- There might be a typing error in the         address.
- If you clicked on a link, it may be out of         date.
What you can try:Retype the address.                                           Go             back to the previous page.                                         Go to the main site and look for the information you want.                                                                                       <ID id="moreInformation">More             information</ID>                                     
This error (HTTP 404 Not Found) means that       Internet Explorer was able to connect to the website, but the page you       wanted was not found. It's possible that the webpage is temporarily       unavailable. Alternatively, the website might have changed or removed the       webpage.

For more information about HTTP errors, see       Help.