alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2905. Youth sponsorship initiatives

(a) In General.—The Commandant is authorized to establish, within any Coast Guard unit, an initiative to help integrate into new surroundings the dependent children of members of the Coast Guard who received permanent change of station orders.

(b) Description of Initiative.—An initiative established under subsection (a) shall—

(1) provide for the involvement of a dependent child of a member of the Coast Guard in the dependent child's new Coast Guard community; and

(2) primarily focus on preteen and teenaged children.

(c) Authority.—In carrying out an initiative under subsection (a), the Commandant may—

(1) provide to a dependent child of a member of the Coast Guard information on youth programs and activities available in the dependent child's new Coast Guard community; and

(2) enter into agreements with nonprofit entities to provide youth programs and activities to such child.

(Added Pub. L. 113–281, title II, §214(a), Dec. 18, 2014, 128 Stat. 3030, §543; renumbered §2905, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §117(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4230.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2905 was renumbered section 5106 of this title.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 543 of this title as this section.
# C_2013147EN.01003102.xml

| 25.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 147/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 147/31

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 13 March 2013 — AK v Commission

(Case F-91/10) (1)

1

(Civil Service - Officials - First paragraph of Article 43 of the Staff Regulations - Delay in drawing up career development reports - Non-pecuniary damage - Loss of the opportunity to be promoted)

2013/C 147/56

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: AK (Esbo, Finland) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Berscheid and J. Baquero Cruz, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision rejecting the applicant’s claim for compensation for the loss suffered by reason of the failure to establish career development reports and for the opening of an administrative inquiry to establish the facts of harassment and application for compensation for the damage suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Orders the European Commission to pay the sum of EUR 15 000 to AK as compensation for non-pecuniary damage; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Orders the European Commission to pay the sum of EUR 15 000 to AK as compensation for non-pecuniary damage;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the sum of EUR 4 000 to AK as compensation for the loss of opportunity to be promoted to a grade higher than A 5 or equivalent before 1 March 2008; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the sum of EUR 4 000 to AK as compensation for the loss of opportunity to be promoted to a grade higher than A 5 or equivalent before 1 March 2008;

| 3. | Dismisses the remainder of the action; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Dismisses the remainder of the action;

| 4. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by AK. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by AK.

---

(1)  OJ C 13, 15.1.2011, p. 40.

1

---
#### § 3.32 Employees.

A sufficient number of employees shall be utilized to maintain the prescribed level of husbandry practices set forth in this subpart. Such practices shall be under the supervision of an animal caretaker who has a background in animal husbandry or care.
# C_2012250EN.01001302.xml

| 18.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 250/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 250/13

---

Judgment of the General Court of 11 July 2012 — Laboratoire Garnier v OHIM (natural beauty)

(Case T-559/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for the Community figurative mark natural beauty - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2012/C 250/23

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Laboratoire Garnier et Cie (Paris, France) (represented: initially by R. Dissmann and A. Steegmann and subsequently by R. Dissmann, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: V. Melgar, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

ACTION brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 September 2010 (Case R 971/2010-1) concerning registration of the figurative sign natural beauty as a Community trade mark

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Laboratoire Garnier et Cie to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Laboratoire Garnier et Cie to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 38, 5.2.2011.

1

---
# C_2007062EN.01000501.xml

| 16.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 62/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 62/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

15 March 2007

(2007/C 62/06)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3226 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 155,09 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4498 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68275 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2680 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6088 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 89,03 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0870 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5794 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,056 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 250,22 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7096 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8950 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,3685 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 33,969 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8630 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6790 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5548 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,3323 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9100 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0279 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 249,79 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,8424 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,2422 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3605 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 201,65 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6456 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 64,259 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,5760 |
| THB | Thai baht | 43,690 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3226

JPY

Japanese yen

155,09

DKK

Danish krone

7,4498

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68275

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2680

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6088

ISK

Iceland króna

89,03

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0870

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5794

CZK

Czech koruna

28,056

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

250,22

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7096

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8950

RON

Romanian leu

3,3685

SKK

Slovak koruna

33,969

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8630

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6790

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5548

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,3323

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9100

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0279

KRW

South Korean won

1 249,79

ZAR

South African rand

9,8424

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,2422

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3605

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 201,65

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6456

PHP

Philippine peso

64,259

RUB

Russian rouble

34,5760

THB

Thai baht

43,690

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
#### § 81.8 Public reading facility.

GAO maintains a public reading facility in the Law Library at the Government Accountability Office Building, 441 G Street, NW., Washington, DC. To determine if a record is part of the public reading facility collection and to schedule an appointment to visit the facility, contact the Library reference desk at 202-512-2585. The facility is open to the public from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. except Saturdays, Sundays, and Federal holidays.

[68 FR 33832, June 6, 2003, as amended at 76 FR 12550, Mar. 8, 2011]
§ 2.40 Attending veterinarian and adequate veterinary care (dealers and exhibitors). ( a ) Each dealer or exhibitor shall have an attending veterinarian who shall provide adequate veterinary care to its animals in compliance with this section. ( 1 ) Each dealer and exhibitor shall employ an attending veterinarian under formal arrangements. In the case of a part-time attending veterinarian or consultant arrangements, the formal arrangements shall include a written program of veterinary care and regularly scheduled visits to the premises of the dealer or exhibitor; and
( 2 ) Each dealer and exhibitor shall assure that the attending veterinarian has appropriate authority to ensure the provision of adequate veterinary care and to oversee the adequacy of other aspects of animal care and use.
( b ) Each dealer or exhibitor shall establish and maintain programs of adequate veterinary care that include: ( 1 ) The availability of appropriate facilities, personnel, equipment, and services to comply with the provisions of this subchapter;
( 2 ) The use of appropriate methods to prevent, control, diagnose, and treat diseases and injuries, and the availability of emergency, weekend, and holiday care;
( 3 ) Daily observation of all animals to assess their health and well-being; *Provided, however,* That daily observation of animals may be accomplished by someone other than the attending veterinarian; and *Provided, further,* That a mechanism of direct and frequent communication is required so that timely and accurate information on problems of animal health, behavior, and well-being is conveyed to the attending veterinarian;
( 4 ) Adequate guidance to personnel involved in the care and use of animals regarding handling, immobilization, anesthesia, analgesia, tranquilization, and euthanasia; and
( 5 ) Adequate pre-procedural and post-procedural care in accordance with established veterinary medical and nursing procedures.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control numbers 0579-0036 and 0579-0486) [54 FR 36147, Aug. 31, 1989, as amended at 88 FR 10714, Feb. 21, 2023]
#### § 592.22 Where service is offered.

Any product may be inspected wherever inspection program personnel are available and the facilities and the conditions are satisfactory for the conduct of the service.
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________
No. 23

- 14241

Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________
JAMES TAYLOR,
Plaintiff

- Appellant,

versus MCCALLA RAYMER LEIBERT PIERCE, LLC, Foreclosure Attorney,

Defendant

- Appellee.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 1:23

- cv

- 00008

- JRH

- BKE USCA11 Case: 23-14241 Document: 7-1 Date Filed: 06/13/2024 Page: 1 of 22 Opinion of the Court 23

- 14241

____________________
Before J ORDAN , J ILL P RYOR , and A BUDU , Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte , for lack of jurisdiction. The 30

- day statutory time limit required James Taylor to filea notice of appeal from the district court’s May 1, 2023 final judgment on or before May 31, 2023. See 28 U.S.C. § 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). However, Taylor did not file a notice of appeal until November 17, 2023. Further, the record contains no basis for relief under Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5) or 4(a)(6) because Taylor did not move to extend or reopen the appeal period or indicate in his notice of appeal that he failed to receive formal notice of the entry of judgment. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) (providing that a party may move to extend the time for filing a notice of appeal within 30 days of entry of final judgment); id. R. 4(a)(6)(A) (providing that the court may reop en the time to file an appeal for a period of 14 days where a party does not receive notice of the entry of the judgment). Accordingly, the notice of appeal is untimely and cannot invoke our appellate jurisdiction. See Green v. Drug Enf’t Admin.
, 606 F.3 d 1296, 1300 (11th Cir. 2010). No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40

- 3 and all other applicable rules. USCA11 Case: 23-14241 Document: 7-1 Date Filed: 06/13/2024 Page: 2 of 2
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRIAN NEWTON, an individual,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

PARKER DRILLING MANAGEMENT

SERVICES, LTD., Erroneously Sued As

Parker Drilling Management Services,

Inc.,

Defendant-Appellee,

 and

PARKER DRILLING MANAGEMENT

SERVICES, INC., a Nevada Corporation,

Defendant.

No. 15-56352

D.C. No. 

2:15-cv-02517-RGK-AGR

ORDER*

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court

Before: PAEZ, BERZON, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Brian Newton sued his former employer, Parker Drilling, in California state

court for wage and hour violations under California law. Parker removed the case

FILED

JUL 23 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
to federal district court and moved for judgment on the pleadings. The district

court granted Parker’s motion, concluding that under the Outer Continental Shelf

Lands Act, 43 U.S.C. §§ 1331–1356b (“OCSLA”), the Fair Labor Standards Act

(“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et. seq., is a comprehensive statutory scheme that

leaves no room for state law to address wage and hour grievances. Newton

appealed, and we vacated and remanded. Newton v. Parker Drilling Mgmt. Servs.,

881 F.3d 1078, 1081–82 (9th Cir. 2018). Parker petitioned for writ of certiorari,

which the Supreme Court granted. Parker Drilling Mgmt. Servs. v. Newton, 139 S.

Ct. 914 (2019). 

The Supreme Court’s opinion issued on June 10, 2019. Parker Drilling

Mgmt. Servs. v. Newton, 139 S. Ct. 1881 (2019). In accordance with the Court’s

opinion, we affirm the district court’s order dismissing Newton’s California law

minimum wage and overtime claims. Because our opinion did not analyze

Newton’s other state-law claims and held that Newton should be given leave to

amend his complaint, the Supreme Court vacated and remanded the case to us. 

We, in turn, VACATE and REMAND to the district court for further proceedings

consistent with the Court’s opinion. 

2
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.10

                           NATIONAL DENTEX CORPORATION
                     KEY EMPLOYEE & CORPORATE SUPPORT GROUP
                           INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

                         PRINCIPAL FEATURES OF THE PLAN

Participation in the Plan

At the start of each plan year, the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors of National Dentex Corporation shall select who will participate in
the Plan for that year.

Standard Bonus

The standard bonus, as used herein, represents the percentage of Base Salary
that is applicable to a National Dentex executive based upon his/her corporate
responsibilities.

Determination of Participant's Bonus

Participants in the Plan will earn incentive compensation based on the
attainment of corporate earnings targets, expressed in terms of Net Income
before taxes and consistent with the Company's budget.

Other Provisions

     1.   Standard bonuses calculated as a percentage of base salary, will use
          for that calculation, annualized salary earnings in effect at the end
          of the Plan Year.

     2.   Bonus payments will be calculated annually based on audited operating
          results and distributed within 90 days of the close of the Company's
          fiscal year.

     3.   The bonus payment will be determined based upon the following: 1/3
          attributable to corporate performance, 1/3 to the individuals specific
          group performance and 1/3 attributable to the individuals overall
          performance as subjectively reviewed by the President and the Board of
          Directors Compensation Committee.

     4.   Eligibility of a participant to receive a full, or a partial bonus
          requires continuous employment within National Dentex Corporation to
          the date actual bonus distributions are made.

     5.   New hire status, promotion, transfer, retirement, disability or death
          does not eliminate or terminate eligibility, and distribution to any
          participant or beneficiary in this category is pro-rated to that
          portion of the year employed in a position covered by the Plan.

     6.   This Plan may be revoked or revised at any time, in total or as it
          applies to any individual whose performance is unsatisfactory, by the
          Board of Directors and does not constitute a legally binding
          commitment. Any deviation from the Plan requires approval of the
          National Dentex Corporation Compensation Committee.
# C_2010221EN.01002401.xml

| 14.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/24

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal administratif de Montreuil (France) lodged on 28 May 2010 — Société Accor Services France v Le Chèque Déjeuner CCR, Etablissement Public de Santé de Ville-Evrard

(Case C-269/10)

()

2010/C 221/38

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal administratif de Montreuil

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Société Accor Services France

Applicant:

Defendants: Le Chèque Déjeuner CCR, Etablissement Public de Santé de Ville-Evrard

Defendants:

Question referred

Question referred

Are the provisions of Article 53 of the Code des marchés publics (Public Procurement Code) compatible with those of Directive 2004/18/EC of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts (1) and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union?

1

---

(1)  Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contract (OJ 2004 L 134, p. 114).

1

---
§ 93.803 Health certificate. ( a ) An elephant, hippopotamus, rhinoceros, or tapir shall not be imported into the United States unless accompanied by a health certificate either signed by a salaried veterinarian of the national veterinary services of the region where the inspection and treatment required by this section occurred or signed by a veterinarian authorized by the national veterinary services of such region and endorsed by a salaried veterinarian of the national veterinary services of such region (the endorsement representing that the veterinarian signing the health certificate was authorized to do so), certifying: ( 1 ) That the elephant, hippopotamus, rhinoceros, or tapir was inspected by the individual signing the health certificate and found free of any ectoparasites not more than 72 hours before being loaded on the means of conveyance which transported the animal to the United States; and
( 2 ) That the elephant, hippopotamus, rhinoceros, or tapir was treated for ectoparasites at least 3 days but not more than 14 days before being loaded on the means of conveyance which transported the animal to the United States. The animal shall have been treated, under the supervision of the individual signing the health certificate, by being thoroughly wetted with a pesticide applied with either a sprayer with a hand-held nozzle, a spray-dip machine, or a dip vat; and
( 3 ) That the elephant, hippopotamus, rhinoceros, or tapir, after being treated for ectoparasites in accordance with paragraph (a)(2) of this section, did not have physical contact with or share a pen or bedding materials with any elephant, hippopotamus, rhinoceros, or tapir not in the same shipment to the United States; and
( 4 ) The name and concentration of the pesticide used to treat the animal (such pesticide and the concentration used must be adequate to kill the types of ectoparasites likely to infest the animal to be imported; a list of recommended pesticides and concentrations may be obtained from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Veterinary Services, Strategy and Policy, 4700 River Road Unit 38, Riverdale, Maryland 20737-1231; and
( 5 ) The name and address of the consignor and consignee.
( b ) [Reserved]
[52 FR 29502, Aug. 10, 1987; 52 FR 35350, Sept. 18, 1987, as amended at 57 FR 23049, June 1, 1992; 59 FR 67615, Dec. 30, 1994. Redesignated and amended at 62 FR 56012, 56021, Oct. 28, 1997; 86 FR 45625, Aug. 16, 2021]
2015 CROP YEAR

IRRIGATED CORN

YIELD EXCLUSION (YE)

Gulf of Mexico

Atlantic

Ocean

Pacific

Ocean

-130° -120° -110° -100° -90° -80° -70°

45° 40° 35° 30° 25°

Coordinate System: Albers

Central Meridian: 96°0'0"W

1st Std Parallel: 20°0'0"N

2nd Std Parallel: 60°0'0"N

Latitude of Origin: 40°0'0"N

Metadata:

County Files - US Census Tiger

Files 2013

YE Coverage - USDA - RMA

December 2014

0 125 250 500 750 1,000

Miles

STATEMENT

The Maps produced represent

the number of years (since 1995)

eligible for yield exclusion for

the 2015 crop year.

Document Path: K:\APH\Irrigated\Corn\IrrigatedCorn.mxd

TABLE

Links directly to the state table

(double click)

Number of Years Eligible for

Yield Exclusion (YE)

0 years

1 year

2 to 4 years

5 to 7 years

8 to 10 years

11 to 15 years
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Seeks Applications to Support Economic Development and Create Jobs 

for People in Rural America

WASHINGTON, Dec. 23, 2021 – U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Under Secretary for Rural 

Development Xochitl Torres Small today announced that the Department is accepting applications for loans to 

support economic development and create jobs for people in rural America.

USDA is offering priority points to projects that advance key priorities under the Biden-Harris Administration 

to help communities recover from the COVID-19 pandemic, advance equity and combat climate change. These 

extra points will increase the likelihood of funding for projects seeking to address these critical challenges in 

rural America.

The funding is being made available under the Intermediary Relending Program that provides a low-interest 

loan to local lenders or “intermediaries” that re-lend the funds to businesses to improve economic conditions 

and create jobs in rural communities. Eligible intermediary lenders include nonprofit corporations, cooperatives, 

federally-recognized Tribes and public agencies.

Loans from an intermediary to an ultimate recipient business may be used for purposes including:

• acquire, build, convert, expand or repair a business or business facility.

• purchase or develop land.

• purchase equipment, machinery or supplies, or make leasehold improvements.

• support start-up costs and working capital.

• control and abate pollution.

• support transportation services.

Competitions for the fiscal year 2022 available funds are conducted quarterly for applications submitted to the 

nearest USDA Rural Development office no later than 4:30 p.m. (local time) by the following deadlines: 

• December 31, 2021; March 31, 2022; June 30, 2022

Eligible applications that are not funded in the quarter received will automatically compete for funding in up to 

three additional quarters.

For additional information, see page 72918 of the Dec. 23, 2021, Federal Register.

If you would like to subscribe to USDA Rural Development updates, visit our GovDelivery subscriber page.

###
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.