alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §§189, 189a. Repealed. Pub. L. 91–412, §3(b), (c), Sept. 25, 1970, 84 Stat. 864

Section 189, act May 15, 1936, ch. 405, §1, 49 Stat. 1335, which authorized Secretary of Commerce to charge for lists of foreign buyers, special statistical services, special commodity news bulletins, and World Trade Directory reports and to deposit collections therefore in the Treasury as miscellaneous receipts, is now covered by sections 1525 and 1526 of this title. Similar provisions were contained in the following acts:

Mar. 22, 1935, ch. 39, 49 Stat. 89.

Apr. 7, 1934, ch. 104, 48 Stat. 550.

Mar. 1, 1933, ch. 144, 47 Stat. 1392.

July 1, 1932, ch. 361, 47 Stat. 501.

June 30, 1932, ch. 314, pt. II, title III, §310, 47 Stat. 410.

Feb. 23, 1931, ch. 280, 46 Stat. 1333.

Apr. 18, 1930, ch. 184, 46 Stat. 197.

Jan. 25, 1929, ch. 102, 45 Stat. 1118.

Feb. 15, 1928, ch. 57, 45 Stat. 87.

Feb. 24, 1927, ch. 189, 44 Stat. 1203.

Apr. 29, 1926, ch. 195, 44 Stat. 353.

Mar. 3, 1881, ch. 130, 21 Stat. 391.

June 16, 1880, ch. 235, 21 Stat. 271.

Section 189a, act May 27, 1935, ch. 148, §1, 49 Stat. 292, which authorized Department of Commerce to make special statistical studies (foreign trade, domestic trade, and other economic matters), to prepare from its records special statistical compilations, and to furnish transcripts (studies, tables, and other records), upon payment of actual cost by requesting person, firm, or corporations, is now covered by section 1525 of this title.
§ 1312.9 Terms and conditions of permits. ( a ) In all permits issued, the Federal land manager shall specify: ( 1 ) The nature and extent of work allowed and required under the permit, including the time, duration, scope, location, and purpose of the work;
( 2 ) The name of the individual(s) responsible for conducting the work and, if different, the name of the individual(s) responsible for carrying out the terms and conditions of the permit;
( 3 ) The name of any university, museum, or other scientific or educational insitutions in which any collected materials and data shall be deposited; and
( 4 ) Reporting requirements.
( b ) The Federal land manager may specify such terms and conditions as deemed necessary, consistent with this part, to protect public safety and other values and/or resources, to secure work areas, to safeguard other legitimate land uses, and to limit activities incidental to work authorized under a permit.
( c ) The Federal land manager shall include in permits issued for archaeological work on Indian lands such terms and conditions as may be requested by the Indian landowner and the Indian tribe having jurisdiction over the lands, and for archaeological work on public lands shall include such terms and conditions as may have been developed pursuant to § 1312.7.
( d ) Initiation of work or other activities under the authority of a permit signifies the permittee's acceptance of the terms and conditions of the permit.
( e ) The permittee shall not be released from requirements of a permit until all outstanding obligations have been satisfied, whether or not the term of the permit has expired.
( f ) The permittee may request that the Federal land manager extend or modify a permit.
( g ) The permittee's performance under any permit issued for a period greater than 1 year shall be subject to review by the Federal land manager, at least annually.
§ 1304.300 Scope and intent. Any structure built upon land subject to a flowage easement held by TVA shall be deemed an obstruction affecting navigation, flood control, or public lands or reservations within the meaning of section 26a of the Act. Such obstructions shall be subject to all requirements of this part except those contained in subpart C of this part, which shall apply as follows: ( a ) All of § 1304.212 shall apply.
( b ) Sections 1304.200, 1304.203, 1304.207, and 1304.209 shall not apply.
( c ) Section 1304.201 shall not apply except for paragraph (c).
( d ) Section 1304.202 shall apply except that TVA shall determine on a case-by-case basis whether it is necessary to remove materials accumulated behind sediment control structures to an upland site.
( e ) Section 1304.204 shall apply except that the “50 feet” trigger of paragraph (i) of that section shall not apply. TVA may impose appropriate requirements to ensure accommodation of neighboring landowners.
( f ) Section 1304.205 shall apply except that the facilities described in paragraph (a) are not limited to locations within an access corridor.
( g ) Section 1304.206 shall apply except for paragraph (b)(3).
( h ) Section 1304.208 shall apply except that TVA approval shall not be required to conduct the activities described in paragraph (a).
( i ) Section 1304.210 shall apply except for paragraph (d).
( j ) Section 1304.211 shall apply except to the extent that it would restrict mowing or other vegetation management.
( k ) Nothing contained in this part shall be construed to be in derogation of the rights of the United States or of TVA under any flowage easement held by the United States or TVA.
### §1242. Introduction, manufacture for introduction, transportation or distribution in interstate commerce; penalty

Whoever knowingly introduces, or manufactures for introduction, into interstate commerce, or transports or distributes in interstate commerce, any switchblade knife, shall be fined not more than $2,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

(Pub. L. 85–623, §2, Aug. 12, 1958, 72 Stat. 562.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective on the sixtieth day after Aug. 12, 1958, see section 6 of Pub. L. 85–623, set out as a note under section 1241 of this title.
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors

Orthovita, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement (Nos. 333-66681, 333-90981, 333-100034, 333-107282, 333-118219, 333-131667) on Form S-8 and in the Registration Statement (Nos. 333-47386, 333-59288, 333-84632, 333-88334, 333-100341, 333-107210, 333-111697, 333-118216,
333-131668) on Form S-3 of Orthovita, Inc. of our reports dated March 16, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Orthovita, Inc. as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
shareholders equity and comprehensive income (loss) and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005, managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2005 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, which reports appear in the December 31, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K of Orthovita, Inc.

Our report dated March 16, 2006, on managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, expresses our opinion that Orthovita, Inc. did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005 because of the effect of a material weakness
on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria and contains an explanatory paragraph that states: As of December 31, 2005, the Company did not maintain effective controls over the processes associated with its year-end physical
inventory count. Specifically, the Companys policies and procedures over its year-end physical inventory count process did not provide for an appropriate level of training to adequately prepare personnel involved in the physical inventory
count, and did not provide for sufficient supervision and review by appropriate company personnel of the physical inventory count results and certain reconciliations prepared in connection with the physical inventory count. As a result of these
internal control deficiencies, the Company completed an inaccurate physical count of inventory on hand at December 31, 2005 and performed an inaccurate compilation of inventory count tags. These deficiencies resulted in a misstatement of
inventory as of December 31, 2005. Additionally, these deficiencies could result in a material misstatement of inventory in the Companys annual or interim consolidated financial statements. Accordingly, management determined that these
control deficiencies constitute a material weakness as of December 31, 2005.



|                          
|--------------------------
|                          
|/s/ KPMG LLP              
|Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
|March 16, 2006
# 	  

	




# 	
 	


  

# 	
 	 


    ! " " # "$ #!  % &  "'

$ () *+  *$ *" ,"+ $   #+ -,, $ .,/,0

   $   ! " ' 1  * ."


- (*.-) #2 *.-%3*&4560

 

7     () / &4   ,  /

 /!+ 

 ! "    
8  0

$  ! " 90 $ 
" 	    
   .:

;,< .=7/7;9/ 79%.>     , +  / &40

	  	

,$$  ' 1 8
80



?  1 8
8  

'2



## 	 	 



 	 !	

"

# 	 	$

 " 	$

 %  " 	
 ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ 8
8 ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ,@@ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ 6 ÁÁÁ ÁÁÁ ÁÁÁ ÁÁÁ ÁÁÁ ÁÁÁ ÁÁÁ -* ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ + -3



 <

'"





9A ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ 8&

8
& ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁ 8,@

88,

8
,@

8
8, ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ

ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ - *1 ( )  

,*  $ 10

9A ;
! 
#
  ,* '

$ 1 (9 4&)0	 


# 	  

	




# 	

	


  &  	 	 "
#### William Wright and Others v. Edgar Whitlock, Individually, etc.

Motion granted, with ten dollars costs.
# C_2013038EN.01001802.xml

| 9.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/18

---

Order of the General Court of 13 December 2012 — Hairdreams v OHIM — Bartmann (MAGIC LIGHT)

(Case T-34/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark MAGIC LIGHT - Earlier national word mark MAGIC LIFE - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2013/C 38/29

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Hairdreams HaarhandelsgmbH (Graz, Austria) (represented by: G. Kresbach, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Schäffner, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Rüdiger Bartmann (Gladbeck, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 November 2009 (Case R 656/2008-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Rüdiger Bartmann and Hairdreams HaarhandelsgmbH.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Hairdreams HaarhandelsgmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Hairdreams HaarhandelsgmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 100, 17.4.2010.

1

---
§ 81.3 Definitions. As used in this part: ( a ) *Identifiable* means a reasonably specific description of a particular record sought, such as the date of the record, subject matter, agency or person involved, etc., which will permit location or retrieval of the record.
( b ) *Records* includes all books, papers, manuals, maps, photographs, reports, and other documentary materials, regardless of physical form or characteristics, including electronically created or maintained materials, under the control of GAO in pursuance of law or in connection with the transaction of public business. As used in this part, the term “records” is limited to an existing record under GAO's control and does not include compiling or procuring records, library or museum material made, acquired, or preserved solely for reference or exhibition purposes, or extra copies of documents preserved only for convenience of reference.
( c ) *Records available to the public* means records which may be examined or copied or of which copies may be obtained, in accordance with this part, by the public or representatives of the press regardless of interest and without specific justification.
( d ) Disclose or disclosure means making available for examination or copying, or furnishing a copy.
( e ) *Person* includes an individual, partnership, corporation, association, or public or private organization other than a Federal agency.
( f ) *Compelling need* means that a failure to obtain requested records on an expedited basis could reasonably be expected to pose an imminent threat to the life or physical safety of an individual, or the records are needed urgently, with respect to a request made by a person primarily engaged in disseminating information, for the requester to inform the public concerning actual or alleged Federal Government activity.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-2011

SONG WU LIN,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A73-181-936)

Submitted: April 30, 2007 Decided: May 11, 2007

Before WILKINSON, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Song Wu Lin, Petitioner Pro Se. Carol Federighi, Kristin Kay

Edison, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT

OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
*As Lin fails to set forth any argument concerning the denial

of protection under the Convention Against Torture, we find that

this claim has been abandoned on appeal. See Yousefi v. INS, 260

F.3d 318, 326 (4th Cir. 2001).

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Song Wu Lin, a native and citizen of the People’s

Republic of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board of

Immigration Appeals denying his applications for asylum,

withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against

Torture. We deny the petition.*

In his petition for review, Lin maintains that he met his

burden of proof for his request for asylum. To obtain reversal of

a determination denying eligibility for relief, an alien “must show

that the evidence he presented was so compelling that no reasonable

factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.”

INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478 (1992). We have reviewed the

evidence of record and conclude that Lin fails to show that the

evidence compels a contrary result.

Additionally, we uphold the denial of Lin’s request for

withholding of removal. “Because the burden of proof for

withholding of removal is higher than for asylum--even though the

facts that must be proved are the same--an applicant who is

ineligible for asylum is necessarily ineligible for withholding of

removal.” Camara v. Ashcroft, 378 F.3d 361, 367 (4th Cir. 2004).
- 3 -

Because Lin fails to show that he is eligible for asylum, he cannot

meet the higher standard for withholding of removal.

Accordingly, though we grant Lin leave to proceed in

forma pauperis, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
#### § 319.143 Breakfast sausage.

“Breakfast sausage” is sausage prepared with fresh and/or frozen meat; or fresh and/or frozen meat and meat byproducts, and may contain Mechanically Separated (Species) in accordance with § 319.6, and may be seasoned with condimental substances as permitted in part 318 of this subchapter. The finished product shall not contain more than 50 percent fat. To facilitate chopping or mixing, water or ice may be used in an amount not to exceed 3 percent of the total ingredients used. Binders or extenders may be added as provided in § 319.140 of this part.

[55 FR 34683, Aug. 24, 1990, as amended at 66 FR 54916, Oct. 31, 2001]
### §1267. Injunctions; criminal contempt; trial by court or jury

#### (a) Jurisdiction

The United States district courts and the United States courts of the territories shall have jurisdiction, for cause shown and subject to the provisions of rule 65(a) and (b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to restrain violations of this chapter.

#### (b) Trials

In any proceeding for criminal contempt for violation of an injunction or restraining order issued under this section, which violation also constitutes a violation of this chapter, trial shall be by the court or, upon demand of the accused, by a jury. Such trial shall be conducted in accordance with the practice and procedure applicable in the case of proceedings subject to the provisions of rule 42(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

(Pub. L. 86–613, §8, July 12, 1960, 74 Stat. 378.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions of Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare under this chapter transferred to Consumer Product Safety Commission, see section 2079 of this title.
March 11, 2024

INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM

To: All Approved Insurance Providers writing in the States of North Carolina and 

Virginia

From: Alexander Sereno, Director 

Raleigh Regional Office

Subject: 2024 Requests for Actuarial Change for Connecticut Broadleaf Tobacco/Cigar 

Type Tobacco

Discussion:

The Raleigh Regional Office (RO) will offer Written Agreements for Connecticut 

Broadleaf tobacco/Cigar Type tobacco for the 2024 Crop Year. All Requests for 

Actuarial Change must meet the minimum documentation requirements and deadlines as 

published in the 2024 Written Agreement Handbook (WAH). A copy of the buyer’s 

contract, that includes the purchase price, is required. An Agricultural Expert Letter is 

not required. 

Beginning with 2024 Pre-Approval Inspections are no longer required. 

It is the decision of the producer to request the type of tobacco that he/she wishes to 

insure; however, currently, there is not sufficient data available with which to build 

actuarially sound offers for Cigar Wrapper or Cigar Binder tobacco (WAH,

85D(1)(g)(ix)).

Connecticut Broadleaf tobacco/Cigar Type tobacco grown in the states of North Carolina 

and Virginia must be contracted with a buyer. As part of minimum documentation, each 

Request for Actuarial Change is required to document that:

• the crop is commercially grown in the area, and

• a viable marketing outlet is available, or a legal marketing contract is in effect for

the crop produced (WAH, 85D(1)(g)(vii)).

United States

Department of

Agriculture

Farm Production 

and Conservation

Risk

Management

Agency

4405 Bland Rd

Suite 160

Raleigh, NC 27609

P: (919) 875-4880

F: (919) 875-4915

USDA is an Equal Opportunity Employer and Provider
Growers are encouraged to visit their crop insurance agent by the March 15 sales closing 

date. 

If you have any questions, please contact:

Delvin Jones @ Delvin.Jones@USDA.gov

Allison Goin @ Allison.Goin@USDA.gov
Exhibit 31.a

I, John P. Manning, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund Limited Partnership;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



1. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





1. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



1. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|Date:  November 14, 2007 | /s/ John P. Manning        
|------------------------ | ---------------------------
|                         |                            
|                         | John P. Manning            
|                         | Principal Executive Officer