alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 43 (Friday, March 4, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12101-12102]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4967]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[ Project No. 12737-002]


Jordan Hydroelectric Limited Partnership; Notice of Environmental 
Assessment

    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's regulations, 18 CFR part 
380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 447897), the Office of Energy Projects has 
reviewed the application for an original license for the 3.7-megawatt 
(MW) Gathright Hydroelectric Project located on the Jackson River in 
Alleghany County, Virginia, and has prepared an Environmental 
Assessment (EA). In the EA, Commission staff analyze the potential 
environmental effects of licensing the project and conclude that 
issuing a license for the project, with appropriate environmental 
measures, would not constitute a major Federal

[[Page 12102]]

action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment.
    A copy of the EA is on file with the Commission and is available 
for public inspection. The EA may also be viewed on the Commission's 
Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the 
docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number 
field to access documents. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support 
at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#de989b8c9d91b0b2b7b0bb8dabaeaeb1acaa9eb8bbacbdf0b9b1a8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="61272433222e0f0d080f04321411110e131521070413024f060e17">[email protected]</span></a> or toll-free at (866) 208-3676, or for 
TTY, (202) 502-8659.
    You may also register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to be notified via e-mail of new filings and 
issuances related to this or other pending projects. For assistance, 
contact FERC Online Support.
    Comments on the EA should be filed within 30 days from the issuance 
date of this notice, and should be addressed to the Secretary, Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Room 1-A, 
Washington, DC 20426. Please affix ``Gathright Hydroelectric Project 
No. 12737-002'' to all comments. Comments may be filed electronically 
via Internet in lieu of paper. The Commission strongly encourages 
electronic filings. See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions 
on the Commission's Web site under the ``eFiling'' link. For further 
information contact Allyson Conner at (202) 502-6082.

    Dated: February 25, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-4967 Filed 3-3-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Editorial Note on Part 28
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear at 76 FR 76873, Dec. 9, 2011.

§ 28.92 Oversight of GAO EEO program. ( a ) When requested by the Board in the exercise of its oversight responsibility, GAO shall provide: ( 1 ) Such plans, procedures and regulations as GAO may develop in order to eliminate and prevent employment discrimination on the bases enumerated in § 28.95;
( 2 ) Reports regarding its efforts to publicize to its employees the procedures to be followed for receiving advice and for filing complaints regarding the enforcement of laws prohibiting discrimination in employment;
( 3 ) Quarterly statistical reports of pre-complaint counseling and of pending complaints, in a manner prescribed by the Board;
( 4 ) An annual report on its equal employment opportunity affirmative action program and its Federal Equal Employment Opportunity Recruitment Program; and
( 5 ) Any other information regarding equal employment opportunity within the GAO that may be required by the Board, in the time frame and format established by the Board after consultation with the Comptroller General or their designee.
( b ) The Board shall review and evaluate the regulations, procedures and practices of the GAO, including the information filed with it in accordance with paragraph (a) above, and shall: ( 1 ) Require the GAO to make any changes the Board determines are needed due to violations of or inconsistencies with Subchapters III and IV of Chapter 7 of Title 31, U.S.C. or equal employment opportunity laws, and
( 2 ) Report to the Congress on the overall progress being made in effectuating the purposes of Subchapters III and IV of Chapter 7 of Title 31, U.S.C.
[58 FR 61992, Nov. 23, 1993, as amended at 89 FR 51399, June 18, 2024]
ORIGINAL 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

DA 21-0190 

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

LISA ROSE HUEY-MCLEOD, 

Defendant and Appellant. 

FEB 08 2022 

Bowen Greenwoc 

,ck of Supreme Court 

state of Montena 

ORDER 

Appellant Lisa Rose Huey-McLeod (McLeod) appeals the First Judicial District 

Court's June 17, 2020 revocation of her fully suspended 2010 sentence in Lewis and Clark 

County Cause Number BDC-2010-62. On revocation, the District Court sentenced McLeod 

to twenty years in the Montana Women's Prison with ten suspended on Count I and ten years 

on Count II, with all ten years suspended. The District Court's written judgment credits 

Ms. McLeod with jail time served from January to June of 2020 but does not credit her with 

the 113 days jail time awarded her in the 2010 judgment. 

The parties have filed a stipulation agreeing that the judgment should be amended to 

include an award of credit for the 113 days included in the initial judgment. Appellant's 

counsel represents that he has identified no other meritorious issues for appeal and that 

McLeod agrees this is the proper course of action. Good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is REMANDED to the First Judicial 

District Court, Lewis and Clark County, with instructions to amend its July 28, 2020 

Amended Judgment and Comtnitment in Lewis and Clark County Cause Number 

BDV 2010-62 to award McLeod 113 days of credit for jail time served as awarded in the 

2010 judgment. Upon entry of the Second Amended Judgment, the Clerk of the District 

Court shall send a certified copy of the same to the Records Department of the Department 

of Corrections. 

02/08/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0190
There being no other issues on appeal, 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the appeal is DISMISSED. 

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to all counsel of record, to the 

Clerk of District Court for Lewis and Clark County, and to the Honorable 

Michael McMahon, presiding judge. 

DATED this 'e t- day of February, 2022. 

Chief Justice 

(6 ?2, 

Justices 

eS) 4 .2 014„.„„
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alliance Laundry Systems LLC, Alliance Laundry Corporation and
Alliance Laundry Holdings LLC (the Companies) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas F. LEsperance, Chief
Executive Officer and President of the Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ THOMAS F. LESPERANCE            
|Chief Executive Officer and President

August 10, 2006
In the Missouri Court of Appeals

Eastern District

JANUARY 27, 2015

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 

84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

1. ED100807 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JEFFREY R. WEINHAUS, 

APP

2. ED100846 QUINCY THREATS, APP V. STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

3. ED100999 PHILLIP SAMUELS, APP V FAIRFIELD CONDOMINIUM, RES

4. ED101347 IN THE INTEREST OF B. J. M.

5. ED101683 IN THE INTEREST OF: DAK, ACK, LGK & MJT
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1980

In Re: A. H. ROBINS COMPANY, INCORPORATED,

Debtor.

_________________________

LYNN GOLD,

Claimant - Appellant,

versus

DALKON SHIELD CLAIMANTS TRUST,

Trust - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Senior

District Judge; Blackwell N. Shelly, Bankruptcy Judge. (CA-85-

1307-R)

Submitted: December 29, 1998 Decided: February 10, 1999

Before WIDENER, HAMILTON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lynn Gold, Appellant Pro Se. Orran Lee Brown, Sr., DALKON SHIELD

CLAIMANTS TRUST, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Lynn Gold appeals the district court’s order denying her

motion to preserve records and motion for extension of trial start

time. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. In Re: A. H. Robins Co. (Gold v.

Dalkon Shield Claimants Trust), No. CA-85-1307-R (E.D. Va. June 3,

1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****Annual reporton performance and accountability.**** 
SuDocNumber:I53.1:
ItemNumber:0600-D-04(online)
CGPSystem Number:000601785
 
2005
2006
 
 **
Exhibit 99.1

Section 906 Certification

 

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Inland Monthly Income Fund II, L.P. (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;

(2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(3) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inland Monthly Income Fund II, L.P.

 

 

By: Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation

       General Partner

 

/S/ Brenda G. Gujral_________________________________

Name: Brenda G. Gujral

Title: President of the General Partner and

          Principal Executive Officer of Inland Monthly Income Fund II, L.P

Date: November 12, 2002
#### § 592.70 Identification.

All inspection program personnel and supervisors shall have in their possession at all times while on duty and present upon request the means of identification furnished by the Department to such person.
§ 590.134 Accessibility of product and cooler rooms. ( a ) Each product for which inspection service is required shall be so placed as to disclose fully its class, quality, quantity, and condition as the circumstances may warrant.
( b ) The perimeter of each cooler room used to store eggs must be made accessible in order for the Secretary's representatives to determine the ambient temperature under which shell eggs packed into containers destined for the ultimate consumer are stored.
[36 FR 9814, May 28, 1971. Redesignated at 42 FR 32514, June 27, 1977, and further redesignated at 46 FR 63203, Dec. 31, 1981, as amended at 63 FR 45675, Aug. 27, 1998; 85 FR 68674, Oct. 29, 2020]
EXHIBIT 10.15

BASE SALARIES FOR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

OF

C&F FINANCIAL CORPORATION

The
following are the base salaries (on an annual basis) in effect as of January 1, 2006 of the named executive officers of C&F Financial Corporation:



|                                                                                    |  |   |        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | - | -------
|Larry G. Dillon Chairman and Chief Executive Officer                                |  | $ | 228,000
|Thomas F. Cherry Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer               |  | $ | 165,000
|Robert L. Bryant Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer               |  | $ | 165,000
|Bryan E. McKernon President and Chief Executive Officer of C&F Mortgage Corporation |  | $ | 150,000
§ 1308.51 Form. ( a ) A subpoena shall state the name of the Board and the title of the appeal; shall command the person to whom it is directed to attend and give testimony at a deposition or hearing, as appropriate, and, if appropriate, to produce specified books, papers, documents, or tangible things at a time and place therein specified; and shall notify the person of the right to request that the subpoena be quashed or modified and of the penalties for contumacy or failure to obey.
( b ) [Reserved]
### §3152. Labor standards

#### (a) Equal wages; increase in employment

Any new program enacted and funded pursuant to the implementation of this chapter shall, subject to any limitations on maximum annual compensation as may be provided in the law authorizing such programs, provide that persons employed are paid equal wages for equal work, and that such policies and programs create a net increase in employment through work that would not otherwise be done or are essential to fulfill national priority purposes.

#### (b) Wage rates; work limitations of reservoir projects employees

Any person employed in any reservoir project enacted and funded pursuant to the implementation of section 3116(c)(1) of this title, or in any other job created pursuant to implementation of this chapter, shall, subject to any limitations on maximum annual compensation as may be provided in the law authorizing such programs, be paid not less than the pay received by others performing the same type of work for the same employer, and in no case less than the minimum wage under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 [29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.]. No person employed in any reservoir project enacted and funded pursuant to implementation of section 3116(c)(1) of this title shall perform work of the type to which sections 3141–3144, 3146, and 3147 of title 40 apply, except as otherwise may be specifically authorized by law.

#### (c) Recommendations of President

Any recommendation by the President for legislation to implement any program enacted pursuant to the provisions of this chapter, requiring the use of funds under this chapter, and submitted pursuant to the requirements of this chapter, shall contain appropriate wage provisions based upon existing wage standard legislation.

(Pub. L. 95–523, title IV, §402, Oct. 27, 1978, 92 Stat. 1908.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

For definition of "this chapter", referred to in text, see References in Text note set out under section 3102 of this title.

The Fair Labor Standards Act, referred to in subsec. (b), is act June 25, 1938, ch. 676. 52 Stat. 1060, which is classified generally to chapter 8 (§201 et seq.) of Title 29, Labor. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 201 of Title 29, and Tables.

#### Codification

"Sections 3141–3144, 3146, and 3147 of title 40 apply" substituted in subsec. (b) for "the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 276a—276a–5) applies" on authority of Pub. L. 107–217, §5(c), Aug. 21, 2002, 116 Stat. 1303, the first section of which enacted Title 40, Public Buildings, Property, and Works.
**CERTIFICATION**

**Pursuant to section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,United States Code)**

Pursuant to section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer ofMillicom International Cellular, S.A., a company incorporated under the laws ofthe Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg (the *“Company”*),hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

TheAnnual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended *December 31,2005* (the *“Report”*) ofthe Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| Date:  | May 1, 2006 |   | By:                     | /s/ DAVID SACH |
|--------|------------------|--------|-------------------------|----------------|
|   |             | Name:  | David Sach              |
|   |             | Title: | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
No. 19,487.

#### Charles W. Griffin, et al. *v.*City of Canon City.

(362 P. [2d] 200)

Decided May 29, 1961.

*16Messrs. Kettlekamp, McGrath & Vento, for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. J. Harrison Hawthorne, for defendant in error.

*En Banc.*

Mr. Justice Moore

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The parties appear here in the same order as in the trial court and we will refer to the plaintiffs in error as contestants and to defendant in error as Canon City or City. Certain parties were permitted to intervene and joined in the arguments advanced by the City in the trial court but do not appear here. The controversy arises out of the annexation of the Town of South Canon to the City of Canon City under the provisions of C.R.S. ’53, 139-9-13 and 14.

At an election held on July 28, 1959, a majority of the electors of both the Town of South Canon and the City of Canon City approved a measure for the annexation, and thereafter both municipalities enacted ordinances providing that the annexation would take effect on October 1, 1959. On October. 16, 1959, the contestants filed their complaint wherein they sought (1) to have the annexation ordinance of the City declared invalid;

(2) to enjoin the enforcement of the said ordinance; and

(3) to have 139-9-13 and 14 declared unconstitutional.

The trial court granted the motion of the City to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction on the grounds that the annexation had been completed and that a de facto, if not a de jure, corporation had been created so that only quo *17warranto would lie, thereby foreclosing the contestants from collaterally attacking 'the validity of the annexation.

Unless prevented by constitutional provision, the General Assembly may authorize the annexation of one municipal corporation to another, 62 C.J.S. 137, §46C

(2) (b), and unless proceedings for the annexation of territory to a municipal corporation are wholly void for want of authority or jurisdiction, their validity is not subject to collateral attack. 62 C.J.S. 177, §66.

The history of the present 139-9-13 and 14 reveals that in 1895 it was held that the' statutory provisions here under attack complied with the constitutional requirement that the General Assembly provide by general law for. the organization of cities and towns. *In re Senate Bill 293, 21*Colo. 38, 39 Pac. 522.

It is not contended that the statutory provisions were not complied with, hence a de facto, if not a de jure, municipal corporation was established. Being a de facto corporation, the general rule is that none but the state through the Attorney General may challenge its existence. *Enos v. District Court,*124 Colo. 335, 238 P. (2d) 861; *Burns v. District Court,*144 Colo. 259, 356 P. (2d) 245.

The trial court correctly determined that the contestants as private citizens have no standing to maintain the action, and the motion to dismiss was properly granted.

The judgment is affirmed.
# C_2013325EN.01002502.xml

| 9.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 325/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 325/25

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 September 2013 — Mamoli Robinetteria v Commission

(Case T-376/10) (1)

1

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Bathroom fittings and fixtures markets of Belgium, Germany, France, Italy, the Netherlands and Austria - Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement - Coordination of price increases and exchange of sensitive business information - Rights of the defence - 2002 Leniency Notice - Plea of illegality - Concept of agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Calculation of the fine - 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines - Gravity - Application of a multiplier to the additional sum)

2013/C 325/42

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Mamoli Robinetteria SpA (Milan, Italy) (represented by: F. Capelli and M. Valcada, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre, A. Antoniadis and L. Malferrari, acting as Agents, assisted initially by F. Ruggeri Laderchi and A. De Matteis, and subsequently by F. Ruggeri Laderchi, lawyers)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2010) 4185 final of 23 June 2010 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/39.092 — Bathroom Fittings and Fixtures), in so far as it concerns the applicant, and, in the alternative, for cancellation or reduction of the fine imposed on the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mamoli Robinetteria SpA to bear its own costs and to pay those of the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mamoli Robinetteria SpA to bear its own costs and to pay those of the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 288, 23.10.2010.

1

---