alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 21 March 2012 — Ebro Foods v Commission**

**(Case T-234/10)**

Action for annulment — State aid — Aid scheme allowing the tax amortisation of financial goodwill for foreign shareholding acquisitions — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market and not ordering the recovery of the aid — No individual concern — Inadmissibility

1.                     *Actions for annulment — Natural or legal persons — Measures of direct and individual concern to them — Commission decision
prohibiting a sectoral aid scheme — Action by an undertaking having benefited from an individual aid granted under that scheme
but not subject to a repayment obligation — Inadmissibility (Art. 263, fourth para., TFEU) (see paras 22-23, 27)*

2.                     *Actions for annulment — Natural or legal persons — Measures of direct and individual concern to them — Individual concern
— Assessment at the time the action was brought (Art. 263, fourth para., TFEU) (see para. 30)*

3.                     *Actions for annulment — Natural or legal persons — Measures of direct and individual concern to them — Commission decision
prohibiting a sectoral aid scheme — Individual concern — Criteria — Person belonging to a closed circle of persons — Capacity
as party to the administrative procedure — No clearly defined position as a negotiator — Inadmissibility (Art. 263, fourth
para., TFEU) (see paras 31, 33-35)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | APPLICATION for annulment of Article 1(1) of Commission Decision 2011/5/EC of 28 October 2009 on the tax amortisation of financial goodwill for foreign shareholding acquisitions C 45/07 (ex NN 51/07, ex CP 9/07) implemented by Spain (OJ 2011 L 7, p. 48). |

**Operative part**

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | The action is dismissed. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Ebro Foods, SA is ordered to pay the costs. |
#### § 78.3 Handling in transit of cattle and bison moved interstate.

Cattle and bison moving interstate, except cattle and bison moved directly to a recognized slaughtering establishment, approved intermediate handling facility, or quarantined feedlot, shall be moved only in a means of conveyance which has been cleaned in accordance with §§ 71.5, 71.7, 71.10, and 71.11 of this chapter and, if unloaded in the course of such movement, shall be handled only in pens cleaned in accordance with the provisions of §§ 71.4, 71.7, 71.10, and 71.11 of this chapter.
EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF
TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)


         Pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of Title 18,  United States Code),  the
undersigned  Chief Financial Officer of Asante'  Technologies,  Inc., a Delaware
corporation  (the  "Company"),  does hereby  certify  with respect to the Annual
Report of the Company on Form  10-KSB for the fiscal year ended  October 2, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "10-KSB Report") that:

         (1) the 10-KSB Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information  contained in the 10-KSB Report fairly presents, in
all material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  January 18, 2005                   ASANTE' TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

                                           /s/ Raj Matthew
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Raj Matthew
                                           Chief Financial Officer
###### Editorial Note on Part 28

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear at 76 FR 76873, Dec. 9, 2011.

#### § 28.91 General.

Pursuant to section 732(f) of Title 31, U.S.C., the Board is authorized to conduct oversight of GAO employment regulations, procedures and practices as they relate to laws prohibiting discrimination in employment on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, political affiliation, age, sex, marital status, or disability.
#### § 153.1 Purpose of regulations.

The regulations in this part govern the procedures in determining the competency of Crow Indians under Public Law 303, 81st Congress, approved September 8, 1949.
§ 311.35 Muscular inflammation, degeneration, or infiltration. ( a ) If muscular lesions are found to be distributed in such a manner or to be of such character that removal is impractical, the carcass shall be condemned.
( b ) If muscular lesions are found to be distributed in such a manner or to be of such character that removal is practical, the following rules shall govern the disposal of the carcasses, edible organs, and other parts of carcasses showing such muscular lesions. If the lesions are localized in such a manner and are of such a character that the affected tissues can be removed, the nonaffected parts of the carcass may be passed for human food after the removal and condemnation of the affected portion. If a part of the carcass shows numerous lesions, or if the character of the lesion is such that complete extirpation is difficult and uncertainly accomplished, or if the lesion renders the part in any way unfit for human food, the part shall be condemned.
( c ) If the lesions are slight or of such character as to be insignificant from a standpoint of wholesomeness, the carcass or parts may be passed for use in the manufacture of comminuted cooked product, after removal and condemnation of the visibly affected portions.
Exhibit


Exhibit 10.62.1





Iowa State University Research Park Corporation
2711 South Loop Drive, Suite 4050
Ames, Iowa 50010-8648














Memorandum of Agreement


DATE:        July 9, 2015


TO:        Carl Langren, VP Finance
NewLink Genetics Corporation
2503 S. Loop Drive, Suite 5100
Ames, IA 50010


FROM:        Steven T. Carter, President


		
	RE:
	ADDENDUM TO THE LEASE BETWEEN ISU RESEARCH PARK CORPORATION AND NEWLINK GENETICS CORPORATION DATED MARCH 1, 2010.




The following information constitutes changes to the Lease Agreement between ISU Research Park Corporation (Landlord) and NewLink Genetics Corporation (Tenant).  Upon signatures of appropriate representatives of Landlord and Tenant affixed to this Memorandum, this Memorandum becomes a part of that Lease Agreement dated March 1, 2010.


Tenant has requested and Landlord agrees to lease Suite 2130 (±2,070 rentable square feet), Building #2 at 2625 North Loop Drive, in the following manner:




Sq. Ft.        Sq. Ft.        Monthly    Monthly    Annual           Annual
Base        Operating    Base        Operating    Base           Operating
Term        Rents        Rents        Rents        Rents        Rents           Rents


8/1/2015-
1/31/2018    $10.50        Actual        $1,811.25    Actual        $21,735.00    Actual




Tenant leases the space as is.  Any modifications will be at the Tenant’s sole expense.  Tenant is responsible for all utility costs and operations.  Subject to the terms of this Memorandum, Tenant agrees that all terms and conditions of the March 1, 2010 Lease and those described in this Memorandum shall remain in force.







Exhibit 10.62.1










NewLink Genetics Corporation
Page Two
July 9, 2015








Please sign and return both originals to my office by July 15, 2015 if you concur with the above terms.  We will then send a fully executed copy for your records.




AGREED


FOR                            FOR
NewLink Genetics Corporation            ISU Research Park Corporation


/s/ Carl Langren                    /s/ Steven Carter
VP Finance                        Director
Title                            Title


July 9, 2015                        July 13, 2015
Date                            Date




































Word/ISURP/Addendums/Adden NewLink 2130 Aug15.doc
# C_2011269EN.01004901.xml

| 10.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/49

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 12 July 2011 — Emme v Commission

(Case T-422/10 R)

(Interim measures - Competition - Commission decision imposing a fine - Bank guarantee - Application to suspend the operation of a measure - Financial loss - No exceptional circumstances - No urgency)

2011/C 269/108

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Emme Holding SpA (Pescara, Italy) (represented by: G. Visconti, E. Vassallo di Castiglione, M. Siragusa, M. Beretta and P. Ferrari, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Gencarelli, V. Bottka and P. Manzini, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application to suspend the operation of Article 2 of Commission Decision C(2010) 4387 final of 30 June 2010 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38.344 — Prestressing steel) and to dispense the applicant from the obligation to provide a bank guarantee so as to avoid immediate recovery of the fine imposed under Article 2 of that decision.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Costs are reserved.

---
# C_2011030EN.01006603.xml

| 29.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/66 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/66

---

Action brought on 15 November 2010 — Di Tullio v Commission

(Case F-119/10)

()

2011/C 30/132

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Roberto Di Tullio (Rovigo, Italy) (represented by: E. Boigelot and S. Woog, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of OLAF's decision refusing to assign the applicant leave for national service under Article 18 of the Conditions of Employment of other Servants.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul OLAF's decision of 21 April 2010 refusing to assign the applicant leave for national service, despite the reminder order from the Guardia di Finanza of 24 February 2010; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul OLAF's decision of 21 April 2010 refusing to assign the applicant leave for national service, despite the reminder order from the Guardia di Finanza of 24 February 2010;

| — | annul the Commission's decision of 10 September 2010 rejecting the applicant's complaint in part on grounds other than those relied upon in the contested decision of 27 April 2010; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Commission's decision of 10 September 2010 rejecting the applicant's complaint in part on grounds other than those relied upon in the contested decision of 27 April 2010;

| — | as a result of those annulments, put the applicant in the position of being on leave for national service from 1 July 2010 until 30 June 2012 inclusive; |
| --- | --- |

—

as a result of those annulments, put the applicant in the position of being on leave for national service from 1 July 2010 until 30 June 2012 inclusive;

| — | order the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Commission to pay the costs.

---
Editorial Note on Part 28
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear at 76 FR 76873, Dec. 9, 2011.

§ 28.46 Motion for subpoena. ( a ) *Authority to issue subpoenas.* Any member of the Board may issue subpoenas requiring the attendance and testimony of witnesses and the production of documentary or other evidence from any place in the United States or any territory or possession thereof, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or the District of Columbia. Any member of the Board may order the taking of depositions or order responses to written interrogatories.
( b ) *Motion.* ( 1 ) A motion for the issuance of a subpoena requiring the attendance and testimony of witnesses or the production of documents or other evidence under § 28.46(a) shall be submitted to the administrative judge at least 15 days in advance of the date scheduled for the commencement of the hearing.
( 2 ) If the subpoena is sought as part of the discovery process, the motion shall be submitted to the administrative judge at least 15 days in advance of the date set for the attendance of the witness at a deposition or the production of documents.
( c ) *Forms and showing.* Motions for subpoenas shall be submitted in writing to the administrative judge and shall specify with particularity the books, papers, or testimony desired and shall be supported by a showing of general relevance and reasonable scope and a statement of the facts expected to be proven thereby.
[58 FR 61992, Nov. 23, 1993, as amended at 68 FR 69301, Dec. 12, 2003]
### §2148. Transactions to accomplish merger

The receipt of assets or assumption of liabilities by the consolidated bank, the exchange of stock, equities, or other ownership interests, and any other transaction carried out in accomplishing the merger of the banks for cooperatives shall not be treated as a taxable event under the laws of the United States or of any State or political subdivision thereof. The preceding sentence shall also apply to the receipt of assets and liabilities by a cooperative to the extent that the net amount of the distribution is immediately reinvested in stock of a consolidated bank (and in such case the basis of such stock shall be appropriately reduced by the amount of gain not recognized by reason of this sentence).

(Pub. L. 92–181, title III, §3.27, as added Pub. L. 100–233, title IV, §415(2), Jan. 6, 1988, 101 Stat. 1644; amended Pub. L. 100–399, title IV, §407(g), Aug. 17, 1988, 102 Stat. 1001.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1988—Pub. L. 100–399 substituted "cooperative" for "taxable institution".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1988 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 100–399 effective as if enacted immediately after enactment of Pub. L. 100–233, which was approved Jan. 6, 1988, see section 1001(a) of Pub. L. 100–399, set out as a note under section 2002 of this title.
**Exhibit 21**

**SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT**

Citizens and Farmers Bank,incorporated in Virginia 

C&F Mortgage Corporation, incorporated in Virginia 

Hometown Settlement Services LLC, organized in Virginia 

Certified Appraisals LLC, organized in Virginia 

C&F Title Agency, Inc.,incorporated in Virginia 

C&F Finance Company, incorporated in Virginia 

C&F Investment Services, Inc., incorporated in Virginia 

C&F Insurance Services, Inc., incorporated in Virginia 

C&F Financial Statutory Trust I,organized in Delaware 

C&F Financial Statutory Trust II, organized in Delaware
TRIBAL LISTENING SESSION

USDA to Host Tribal Listening Session to Solicit Feedback on How to Improve 

Rural Development’s Environmental Review Process

WASHINGTON, June 22, 2021 – The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) today announced it is hosting 

a listening session on June 29, 2021, to solicit feedback from tribal applicants on ways to improve USDA Rural 

Development’s (RD) environmental review process. USDA is encouraging the feedback from Federally 

recognized Tribes and tribal organizations that apply for, or have received, funding from one or more RD 

programs. 

The Department is inviting feedback on environmental review policies and procedures in 7 CFR Part 1970.

USDA recognizes the unique circumstances that govern the environmental review process for projects on tribal 

lands. During this session, Tribes and tribal organizations will have the opportunity to provide integral feedback 

on their experiences.

 

This listening session is part of a series designed to gather input from a broad range of Rural Development 

customers and perspectives. 

This session will be held virtually on Tuesday, June 29, 2021, at 3:30 p.m. Eastern Time. To register, visit:

https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/445530223291604240. 

Registrants will receive an email with instructions to join online or by phone. For questions about the listening 

session, please email louise.torres@usda.gov, or call 202-815-2852.

If you’d like to subscribe to USDA Rural Development updates, visit our GovDelivery subscriber page.

###

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender.
Editorial Note on Part 28
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear at 76 FR 76873, Dec. 9, 2011.

§ 28.146 Explanation and definitions. ( a ) Ex parte communications are oral or written communications between decision-making personnel of the Board and an interested party to a proceeding without providing the other parties to the proceeding a chance to participate. The only ex parte communications that are prohibited are those that involve the merits of the case or those that violate other rules requiring submissions to be in writing. Accordingly, interested parties may make inquiries about such matters as the status of a case, when it will be heard, and the method for transmitting evidence to the Board. Such communications should be directed to the Clerk of the Board. Parties may not inquire about such matters as what defense they should use or whether their evidence is adequate, make a submission orally which is required to be in writing, or otherwise inquire as to the merits of a pending case.
( b ) In this subpart— ( 1 ) “Interested party” includes: ( i ) Any party, including the General Counsel of the Board, or representative of a party involved in a proceeding before the Board;
( ii ) Any person desiring to intervene in any proceeding before the Board; or
( iii ) Any other person who might be affected by the outcome of a proceeding before the Board.
( 2 ) “Decision-making personnel” means the Board, a panel of Board members, a Board member, an administrative judge, and/or an employee of the Board, who reasonably can be expected to participate in the decision-making process of the Board.
[58 FR 61992, Nov. 23, 1993, as amended at 68 FR 69304, Dec. 12, 2003]
#### Stamford Jewish Center, Inc. *v.*Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Stamford

*John Keogh, Jr.,*in support of the petition.

*Joel E. Ereedman,*corporation counsel, in opposition.

Submitted June 11

decided June 25, 1974

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Pair-field County at Stamford is denied and, in view of this, the defendant’s ancillary petitions and motions need not be considered.
EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION

The undersigned officers of Motient Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), do hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their
knowledge:

     o    the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the year ended
          December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
          Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
          Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
          and

     o    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


                                      /s/ Christopher W. Downie
                                      -------------------------
                                      Christopher W. Downie
                                      Executive Vice President, Chief Operating
                                      Officer and Treasurer
                                      (Principal Executive Officer)

                                      April 29, 2005

                                      /s/ Myrna J. Newman
                                      -------------------
                                      Myrna J. Newman
                                      Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
                                      (Principal Financial Officer)

                                      April 29, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Motient Corporation and will be retained by Motient Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 1304.303 Channel excavation. ( a ) Channel excavation of privately-owned reservoir bottom subject to a TVA flowage easement does not require approval by TVA under section 26a if: ( 1 ) All dredged material is placed above the limits of the 100-year floodplain or the TVA flood risk profile elevation, whichever is applicable, and
( 2 ) The dredging is not being accomplished in conjunction with the construction of a structure requiring a section 26a permit.
( b ) Any fill material placed within the flood control zone of a TVA reservoir requires TVA review and approval.
( c ) TVA shall encourage owners of flowage easement property to adopt the standards for channel excavation applicable to TVA-owned residential access shoreland.
§ 77.29 Interstate movement from accreditation preparatory States and zones. Except for captive cervids from a qualified herd or monitored herd, as provided in §§ 77.36 and 77.37, respectively, captive cervids that originate in an accreditation preparatory State or zone, and that are not known to be infected with or exposed to tuberculosis, may be moved interstate only in accordance with 9 CFR part 86 and, if moved anywhere other than directly to slaughter at a recognized slaughtering establishment, under one of the following additional conditions: ( a ) The captive cervids are from an accredited herd; are officially identified; and are accompanied by an ICVI stating that the accredited herd completed the testing necessary for accredited status with negative results within 24 months prior to the date of movement and that the individual animals to be moved were negative to an official tuberculin test conducted within 90 days prior to the date of movement.
( b ) The captive cervids are sexually intact animals; are not from an accredited herd; are officially identified; and are accompanied by an ICVI stating that the herd from which they originated was negative to a whole herd test conducted within 1 year prior to the date of movement and that the individual animals to be moved were negative to two additional official tuberculin tests conducted at least 90 days apart and no more than 6 months apart, with the second test conducted within 90 days prior to the date of movement; *Except that:* The second additional test is not required if the animals are moved interstate within 6 months following the whole herd test.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0146) [78 FR 2067, Jan. 9, 2013]