alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 590.590 Use of irradiated shell eggs to produce egg products.

Irradiated shell eggs used to produce pasteurized egg products must be used in conjunction with heat or another lethality treatment sufficient to produce egg products that are edible without additional preparation to achieve food safety. Unless otherwise approved by FDA, the irradiation treatment of the shell eggs must precede the heat or other lethality treatment applied to the egg products.
SCPR-18-0000752

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

IN RE MILTON S. TANI, Petitioner.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER GRANTING PETITION TO RESIGN AND SURRENDER LICENSE (By: Reck tenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Mc Kenna, Po llack, an d Wilson, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the petition to resign and surrender his license to practice law in the State of Hawai # i filed by attorney Milton S. Tani, pursuant to Rule 1.10 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai # i (RSCH), and the affidavits submitted in support thereof, we conclude Petitioner Tani has complied with the requirements of RSCH Rule 1.10. Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to RSCH Rule 1.10(g), that the Petitioner shall comply with the notice, affidavit, and record requirements of RSCH Rules 2.16(a), (b), (d), and (g).

IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the Clerk shall remove the name of Petitioner Milton S. Tani, attorney number 3037, from the roll of attorneys of the State of Hawai # i, effective with the filing of this order.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, October 17, 2018. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPR-18-0000752 17-OCT-2018 01:06 PM
IV

House Calendar No. 283

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 591

[Report No. 106–887]

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 109) making

continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 25, 2000

Mr. LINDER, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res.

109) making continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

2001, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution

2 it shall be in order without intervention of any point of

3 order to consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J.

4 Res. 109) making continuing appropriations for the fiscal

5 year 2001, and for other purposes. The joint resolution

6 shall be considered as read for amendment. The previous

7 question shall be considered as ordered on the joint resolu-
2

HRES 591 RH

1 tion to final passage without intervening motion except:

2 (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by

3 the chairman and ranking minority member of the Com4 mittee on Appropriations; and (2) one motion to recommit.

House Calendar No. 283

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 591

[Report No. 106–887]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution

(H.J. Res. 109) making continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and for other purposes.

SEPTEMBER 25, 2000

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
§ 37.31 Source document retention. ( a ) States must retain copies of the application, declaration and source documents presented under § 37.11 of this part, including documents used to establish all names recorded by the DMV under § 37.11(c)(2). States shall take measures to protect any personally identifiable information collected pursuant to the REAL ID Act as described in their security plan under § 37.41(b)(2). ( 1 ) States that choose to keep paper copies of source documents must retain the copies for a minimum of seven years.
( 2 ) States that choose to transfer information from paper copies to microfiche must retain the microfiche for a minimum of ten years.
( 3 ) States that choose to keep digital images of source documents must retain the images for a minimum of ten years.
( 4 ) States are not required to retain the declaration with application and source documents, but must retain the declaration consistent with applicable State document retention requirements and retention periods.
( b ) States using digital imaging to retain source documents must store the images as follows: ( 1 ) Photo images must be stored in the Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) 2000 standard for image compression, or a standard that is interoperable with the JPEG standard. Images must be stored in an open (consensus) format, without proprietary wrappers, to ensure States can effectively use the image captures of other States as needed.
( 2 ) Document and signature images must be stored in a compressed Tagged Image Format (TIF), or a standard that is interoperable with the TIF standard.
( 3 ) All images must be retrievable by the DMV if properly requested by law enforcement.
( c ) Upon request by an applicant, a State shall record and retain the applicant's name, date of birth, certificate numbers, date filed, and issuing agency in lieu of an image or copy of the applicant's birth certificate, where such procedures are required by State law.
§ 113.4 Contribution and expenditure limitations (52 U.S.C. 30116). ( a ) Any contributions to, or expenditures from an office account which are made for the purpose of influencing a federal election shall be subject to 52 U.S.C. 30116 and 11 CFR part 110 of these regulations.
( b ) If any treasury funds of a corporation or labor organization are donated to an office account, no funds from that office account may be transferred to a political committee account or otherwise used in connection with a federal election.
[45 FR 15124, Mar. 7, 1980, as amended at 79 FR 77849, Dec. 29, 2014]
### §240. Rules and regulations

Rules and regulations for the enforcement of sections 237 to 242 of this title, not inconsistent with the provisions of said sections, shall be made by the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology and approved by the Secretary of Commerce, and such rules and regulations shall include reasonable variations or tolerances which may be allowed.

(Aug. 23, 1916, ch. 396, §4, 39 Stat. 531; Pub. L. 100–418, title V, §5115(c), Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1433.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1988—Pub. L. 100–418 substituted "National Institute of Standards and Technology" for "Bureau of Standards".

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions of all other officers of Department of Commerce and functions of all agencies and employees of such Department, with a few exceptions, transferred to Secretary of Commerce, with power vested in him to authorize their performance or performance of any of his functions by any of such officers, agencies, and employees, by Reorg. Plan No. 5 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1263, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
# C_2012343EN.01001502.xml

| 10.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 343/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 343/15

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2012 — Hungary v Commission

(Case T-407/10) (1)

1

(Structural funds - Financial assistance - Budapest-Kelenföld-Székesfehérvár-Boba railway line - VAT - Non-eligible expenditure)

2012/C 343/24

Language of the case: Hungarian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Hungary (represented by: M.Z. Fehér and K. Szíjjártó, agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Steiblytė, D. Triantafyllou and V. Bottka, agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for annulment brought against the Commission Decision of 8 July 2010 relating to the major project for ‘Reconstruction of the Budapest-Kelenföld-Székesfehérvár-Boba railway line, section 1, phase 1’ forming part of the ‘Transport’ operational programme for structural support from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) and the Cohesion Fund (CCI 2008HU161PR015).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Hungary to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Hungary to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 317, 20.11.2010.

1

---
§ 36.22 Standard VII—Elementary instructional program. ( a ) The elementary instruction programs, grades one through six, shall include but need not be limited to: ( 1 ) Language arts.
( 2 ) Mathematics.
( 3 ) Social studies.
( 4 ) Sciences.
( 5 ) Fine arts.
( 6 ) Physical education.
( b ) Each school shall integrate the following content areas into its curriculum: ( 1 ) Career awareness,
( 2 ) Environmental and safety education,
( 3 ) Health education (includes requirements contained in 24 Stat. 69),
( 4 ) Metric education, and
( 5 ) Computer literacy.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alliance Laundry Systems LLC, Alliance Laundry Corporation and
Alliance Laundry Holdings LLC (the Companies) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas F. LEsperance,
Chief Executive Officer and President of the Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ THOMAS F. LESPERANCE            
|Chief Executive Officer and President

November 14, 2006
#### § 9037.1 Payments of Presidential primary matching funds.

Upon receipt of a written certification from the Commission, but not before the beginning of the matching payment period, the Secretary will promptly transfer the amount certified from the matching payment account to the candidate. A matching fund certification may not result in full payment by the Secretary in the case of a shortfall in the matching payment account. See 26 CFR 702.9037-1 and 702.9037-2.

[56 FR 34134, July 25, 1991]
# C_2010100EN.01006002.xml

| 17.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 100/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 100/60

---

Action brought on 15 February 2010 — Sphere Time v OHIM — Punch (watches)

(Case T-68/10)

2010/C 100/89

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Sphere Time société anonyme (Windhof, Luxembourg) (represented by: C. Jäger, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Punch, société par actions simplifiée (Nice, France)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 2 December 2009 in case R 1130/2008-3 and order the defendant to confirm the validity of the challenged Community registered design; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 2 December 2009 in case R 1130/2008-3 and order the defendant to confirm the validity of the challenged Community registered design; and

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of the present proceedings and to enact that the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal bears the costs of the applicant related to the invalidity and appeal proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of the present proceedings and to enact that the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal bears the costs of the applicant related to the invalidity and appeal proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community design subject of the application for a declaration of invalidity: A design registered for ‘watches’

Registered Community design subject of the application for a declaration of invalidity:

Proprietor of the Community design: The applicant

Proprietor of the Community design:

Party requesting the declaration of invalidity of the Community design: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Party requesting the declaration of invalidity of the Community design:

Decision of the Invalidity Division: Declared the contested Community design invalid

Decision of the Invalidity Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 4, 5 and 6 of Council Regulation No 6/2002, as the Board of Appeal wrongly considered the challenged design as lacking individual character and as not being new; infringement of Article 61(2) of Council Regulation No 6/2002 as the Board of Appeal has not correctly evaluated the applicant’s arguments and evidences submitted in the course of the proceedings, misinterpreted the freedom of the designer and based its decision on a false appreciation, thereby misusing its power.

Pleas in law:

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE QUARTER
ENDING JULY 31, 1998 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                             501
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   501
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     501
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              168
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,667)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       501
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     9
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,178
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (9)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,169)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,169)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,169)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 48 (Friday, March 11, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13438-13439]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5644]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]


AccessTel, Inc., American Asset Management Corp., DME Interactive 
Holdings, Inc., DocuPort, Inc., and iCarbon Corp., Order of Suspension 
of Trading

March 8, 2011.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
AccessTel, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports since the 
period ended March 31, 2005.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
American Asset Management Corp. because it has not filed any periodic 
reports since the period ended March 31, 2005.

[[Page 13439]]

    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
DME Interactive Holdings, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic 
reports since the period ended March 31, 2001.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
DocuPort, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports since the 
period ended September 30, 2000.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
iCarbon Corp. because it has not filed any periodic reports since the 
period ended December 31, 2006.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the 
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the 
securities of the above-listed companies. Therefore, it is ordered, 
pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that 
trading in the securities of the above-listed companies is suspended 
for the period from 9:30 a.m. EST on March 8, 2011, through 11:59 p.m. 
EDT on March 21, 2011.

    By the Commission.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-5644 Filed 3-8-11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Hon. George H. Sheppard 

Comptroller of Public Accounts 

Austin, Texas 

Dear Sir: 

Opinion No. o-1535 

Re: Collection of S 

on nine and ten 

opinion of 

By your letter of Cfii;;;kgy;;&&lzthe 

this Department up n tAe 

as other occu 

Revised Civil Statd for the calendar 

also quoted in your letidea anyone wishing to pursue 

ions named in this Chapter 

occupation tax may. be leviezPo&y 

g the stie quarterly . .'. No p&son 

owed license for keeping any nine or 

ten pin alley, or anything of the kind used for 

profit, for a period of less than twelve months." 

This Department has heretofore held that the county 

tax on nine and ten pin alleys could not be paid quarterly, 
Hon. George H. Sheppard,,Page 2 

but must be aid for a full year from the date the operation 

connuences. lp See opinions by: John J. McKa 

1937; Cecil C. Rotsch, June 2, 1939, O-680. 

February 27, 

1' 

A reading of Article 7048 reveals that it deals 

only with the collection of county occupation taxes. 

provision that "no person shall be allowed license forTkeping any nine.or ten pin alleys, or anything of the kind used 

for_profit, for a period of less than twelve months" appears 

in this Article, and there is nothing to suggest that it 

was intended to apply to the State occupation tax on such 

occupation. 

We ard of the opinion, therefore that the State 

occupation tax on such nine,and ten pin alleys may be prorated from the quarter the occupation~commences as other 

State occupation taxes are now collected. 

Yours very truly 

ATTORNEY GENZUL OF TEXAS 

BY 

(.signea) 

R. ti. Fairchild 

A&zistant 

Rw:pbp 

APPROVED: October 30, 1939 

Gerald C. Mann (signea) 

ATTORNEYGENERALOF TEXAS 

APPROVED 

OPINION 

COMdITTEE 

BY B.W.B. 

CHAIRMAN
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TATHAM
OFFSHORE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT JUNE 30, 2000
INCLUDED IN ITS FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,731
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,079
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,821
<PP&E>                                             449
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  22,679
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,326
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        176
<COMMON>                                           261
<OTHER-SE>                                    (20,084)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    22,679
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    64
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,802
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,996)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,101)
<DISCONTINUED>                                (72,574)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (83,675)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (3.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.21)


</TABLE>