alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 28
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear at 76 FR 76873, Dec. 9, 2011.

§ 28.115 Processing petitions. ( a ) Upon the expiration of the 10-day posting period, and after the General Counsel considers an appropriate period has elapsed for consultation among the parties to resolve or identify issues, the General Counsel shall prepare a report to the Board which may recommend: ( 1 ) Approval of any agreement entered into by the parties during their consultations including an agreement on the appropriate units, on the withdrawal of the petition, or on a joint request to conduct an election to determine which labor organization, if any, the employees select to be their exclusive bargaining representative;
( 2 ) Dismissal of the petition as being without merit; or
( 3 ) Issuance of a notice of hearing for the purpose of disposing of the remaining issues raised in the petition.
( b ) The General Counsel's report shall be supplied to all interested parties, and, unless all parties agree to a shorter period, they shall have 15 days during which to file any response with the Board.
( c ) The Board, as expeditiously as feasible after the expiration of the period specified in paragraph (b) of this section, but no later than 30 days thereafter, shall either approve the report and order appropriate steps to carry out its recommendations, or remand it to the General Counsel with further instructions.
( d ) Where a hearing is ordered, an administrative judge shall be designated by the Board. The report of the administrative judge shall include Findings of Fact and Recommendations.
( e ) After receiving the report from the administrative judge, and after providing the parties with an opportunity for comment, the Board shall issue a Decision and Order determining the appropriate unit, directing an election, dismissing the petition or making some other appropriate disposition of the matter.
( f ) Final Decisions and Orders issued by the Board based on hearings held in accordance with paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section shall not be considered final decisions subject to appeal before the Circuit Courts of Appeal.
To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA From: "Dick Sturm" <dsturm@wppienergy.org>
Date: 07/15/2010 12:31PM Subject: Plant ID: 02569 - Policy Questions- Possible Extension Request

Dear Jezebele,

Policy Question #1: Part A - Question A1-11: Is the generation of electricity the primary purpose (i.e., the predominant source of revenue and principal reason for operation) of the plant?

In 2004-2005 MU converted the River Street Electrical Generation Station to a Steam Facility/CoGeneration Facility with the prim ary purpose being the production of process steam to local paper mills and electrical generation as a by product. The issue is furt her complicated by the fact that the facility went into financial default and ceased operation on October 9, 2009. We are currently passively marketing the facility as a co-generation facility. It is also clear that as the present owner MU is not likely to ever operate th e plant again.

Based on the above Menasha Ut ilities answer to Part A, Question A1-11 would be No, and we would not complete the remainder of the questionnaire. Do you agree with this reasoning? If you agree please disregard the re quest for an extension to complete the ICR. Please reply that our inte rpretation is correct.

Policy Question #2: I have been unable to find a definition for the acro nym BCI which appears as a preliminary question to each qu estion. Would you please provide the definition for BCI.

Request for an extension

- if needed.

Menasha Utilities, Plant ID: 02569 wo uld by this email respectfully request a time extension to complete information collection request (ICR). In itially I intended and felt the 90 day completion could be met, however after begi nning the ICR and recognizing the volume of information being requested I now realize that we can not meet that deadline. Menasha Utilities does not have a full time environmental person to devote the ti me needed to complete the ICR. In addition

Menasha Utilities Steam Pl ant ceased operation on October 9, 2009 due to financial difficulties. The plant is now shuttered and in a moth-balled state with ef forts being made to sell the plant. All Steam Plant employees including mana gement have either been transferred or are on layoff status which further complicates the issue of completing the ICR within the 90 day period.

Menasha Utilities respectfully is requesting an additional six months beyond the 90 days to complete the ICR.

Sincerely,

Dick Sturm Co-General Manager / Engineering and Operations

Menasha Utilities

P.O Box 340
Menasha, WI 54952 Phone (920) 967-3410 Cell (920) 540-1125 Fax (920) 967-3440

NOTE: New E-Mail Address: dsturm@wppienergy.org 

### Pa g e 2 of 3

8/24/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\TMedle y \Local Settin g s\Tem p \XP g r p wise\4C403C41DO

...
49–008 

114TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 114–31 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE JOINT RESOLUTION (H.J. RES. 

35) MAKING FURTHER CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 

2015, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES 

FEBRUARY 26, 2015.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. SESSIONS, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 129] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 129, by a record vote of 7 to 4, report the same to the 

House with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 35, making 

further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2015, and for other 

purposes, under a closed rule. The resolution provides one hour of 

debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. The resolution 

waives all points of order against consideration of the joint resolution. The resolution provides that the joint resolution shall be considered as read. The resolution waives all points of order against 

provisions in the joint resolution. The resolution provides one motion to recommit. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

The waiver of all points of order against consideration of the joint 

resolution includes a waiver of clause 11 of rule XXI, prohibiting 

the consideration of a bill or joint resolution which has not been 

reported by a committee until the third calendar day on which such 

measure has been available to Members, Delegates, and the Resident Commissioner. 

Although the resolution waives all points of order against provisions in the joint resolution, the Committee is not aware of any 

points of order. The waiver is prophylactic in nature. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING
2 

COMMITTEE VOTES

The results of each record vote on an amendment or motion to 

report, together with the names of those voting for and against, are 

printed below: 

Rules Committee record vote No. 29 

Motion by Ms. Foxx to report the rule. Adopted: 7–4 

Majority Members Vote Minority Members Vote 

Ms. Foxx ............................................................ Yea Ms. Slaughter .................................................. Nay 

Mr. Cole ............................................................ Yea Mr. McGovern ................................................... Nay 

Mr. Woodall ...................................................... Yea Mr. Hastings of Florida ................................... Nay 

Mr. Burgess ...................................................... Yea Mr. Polis ........................................................... Nay 

Mr. Stivers ........................................................ Yea 

Mr. Collins ........................................................ Yea 

Mr. Sessions, Chairman ................................... Yea 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with HEARING
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                                                   <C>

                                                                       Exhibit 23

                    Consent of Independent Public Accountants

      As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of our reports dated May 11, 1999 (except with respect to the matters
discussed in Note 18, as to which the date is June 1, 1999), included in or
incorporated by reference into ThermoRetec Corporation's Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended April 3, 1999, and into the Company's previously
filed Registration Statements as follows: Registration Statement No. 33-92058 on
Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 33-85368 on Form S-8, Registration
Statement No. 33-85370 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 33-85374 on Form
S-8, Registration Statement No. 33-85372 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No.
333-00062 on Form S-3, Registration Statement No. 33-80747 on Form S-8,
Registration Statement No. 33-80515 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No.
33-81226 on Form S-3D, Registration Statement No. 333-35373 on Form S-3,
Registration Statement No. 333-33341 on Form S-3D, and Registration Statement
No. 333-75051 on Form S-3D.



                                                             Arthur Andersen LLP



Boston, Massachusetts
June 7, 1998


</TABLE>
# C_2010328EN.01003601.xml

| 4.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/36

---

Appeal brought on 20 September 2010 by Salvatore Magazzu against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 8 July 2010 in Case F-126/06, Magazzu v Commission

(Case T-442/10 P)

()

2010/C 328/61

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Salvatore Magazzu (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by M. Velardo, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Other party to the proceedings:

Forms of order sought by the appellant

Forms of order sought by the appellant

| — | Annulment of the judgment in Case F-126/06 Magazzu v Commission; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annulment of the judgment in Case F-126/06 Magazzu v Commission;

Magazzu

Commission

| — | Annulment of the decision of 13 December 2005 in so far as it classifies the applicant as a probationary official in grade A*6, step 2, as from 1 January 2006; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annulment of the decision of 13 December 2005 in so far as it classifies the applicant as a probationary official in grade A*6, step 2, as from 1 January 2006;

| — | Reference of the case back to the Civil Service Tribunal for judgment; |
| --- | --- |

—

Reference of the case back to the Civil Service Tribunal for judgment;

| — | Costs against the Commission, including those of the procedure at first instance. |
| --- | --- |

—

Costs against the Commission, including those of the procedure at first instance.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments raised by the appellant are essentially identical or similar to those raised in Case T-441/10 P Kurrer v Commission.

Kurrer

Commission

---
#### § 83.10 First Amendment rights.

Personnel records or entries thereon describing how individuals exercise rights guaranteed by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution are prohibited, unless expressly authorized by statute or by the individual concerned, or unless pertinent to and within the scope of an authorized law enforcement activity. These rights include, but are not limited to, free exercise of religious and political beliefs, freedom of speech and the press, and freedom to assemble and to petition the Government.
-  Español 
            -  Deutsch 
            -  Tiếng Việt 
            -  繁體中文 
            -  한국어 
            -  Français 
            -  Русский 

## 概述 

美國農業部農村發展局通過投資現代化基礎設施(如高速互聯網、水處理和廢水處理系統)來支持農村繁榮。 我們幫助人們購買或租賃負擔得起的住房,並可以與您合作建設或改善必要的社區設施,如醫院、圖書館和學校。我們通過為小企業主和企業家提供技術支援,幫助他們設計强大的商業計畫、尋找新市場並推廣他們的商品和服務,來促進農村經濟發展。 我們還可以幫助您擴大或改善您的農村企業或製造設施,並支持為農業和工業融資可再生能源系統的能源計畫。由於我們的許多員工生活和工作在我們服務的社區中,囙此美國農業部農村發展局的使命對我們來說是個人的。 正是這種對鄰里的承諾使我們與眾不同。 請向下滾動以瞭解更多關於我們如何幫助您和您的社區的資訊。

美國農業部農村發展概覽.

## 商業計畫 

美國農業部(USDA)農村發展部門致力於為農村地區的人們和地方提供承諾和資源,以推動經濟的安全和繁榮。 我們的商業合作計畫旨在幫助您開始或發展業務,並尋找並連接新市場。 我們還提供資金,可幫助您用現代、永續的能源為您的業務或製造設施提供動力。

### 一個RD保證貸款計畫

我們的一個RD保證貸款計畫,已經取消了不必要的規定,以幫助新增私人投資在我們的四個旗艦貸款保證計畫中的農村企業和經濟發展項目:水和廢物處理,社區設施,商業和產業,以及美國農村能源。 這個計畫為給農村企業貸款的合格貸款人製定了統一的要求、流程和表格。 該計畫開放給參與的聯邦和州特許銀行、儲蓄貸款、農業信貸銀行直接貸款授權和信用合作社。 農村企業提供貸款擔保。

### 農村合作發展撥款

RBDGs旨在幫助建立和運營合作發展中心。 這些中心提供科技援助,進行可行性研究,製定商業計畫,提供培訓,並促進戰略規劃,等等。 這些中心可以設在任何地方——都市或農村——但必須服務於人口在5萬或以下的地區。農村合作社發展補助金

## 住房計畫

穩定和負擔得起的住房有助於全國各地的小鎮保持健康和繁榮。 我們的農村住房計畫提供低利率的易獲得融資,使有資格的農村家庭能够購買、修繕或租賃房屋。 通過避免大額首付,我們的低息貸款幫助更多農村人民成為業主並開始積累財富。 在某些地區,我們與非營利組織合作,幫助家庭建造自己和彼此的住房,降低抵押貸款的成本。

通過我們的購房計畫,有資格的申請人可以購買現有房屋、建造新房、為住房建設準備地皮,或在特定情况下重新融資現有住房。 對於收入有限的家庭和個人,我們還提供修繕、改善或現代化住房的貸款

### 2021年美國救援計畫法案

ARPA幫助已有COVID-19相關付款暫停的USDA農村發展單戶住房直接貸款和住房修繕借款人再融資並延長他們的抵押貸款。 這有助於我們的借款人確保在暫停期結束後,其貸款付款仍然負擔得起。 支持ARPA的額外資金將在2023年9月30日之前提供。這項計劃

### 單戶住房直接貸款

擁有一個稱為家的地方為農村家庭提供了一個堅實的基礎,使他們能够繁榮和成長。 如果您無法從私人貸款人那裡獲得抵押貸款,您可能有資格申請來自USDA農村發展的單戶直接住房貸款。 我們的購房計畫不需要首付或私人抵押保險,並提供可承受的固定利率融資,最高可達貸款的100%。 您還可以包括結算費用和必要維修。 單戶住房直接貸款可用於購買或再融資現有住房、建造新住房或購買和準備土地進行建設。 直接貸款計劃

### 單戶住宅擔保貸款計畫

通過此計畫,您將與一家私人的、經過農村發展部門認可的貸款機构合作,在符合資格的農村地區購買一所適度的住房,然後美國農業部對貸款提供90%的擔保。 不需要首付款,您可以獲得高達100%的融資,用於購買、建造、改善甚至搬遷住房。 符合條件的農村發展部門直接或擔保房屋貸款計畫客戶也可以使用此計畫來重新貸款。單戶住房擔保貸款

### 單戶住宅維修貸款和補助金

我們的家庭修繕貸款和補助金計畫為符合資格的低收入業主提供1%的利率貸款,最高可達40000美元,幫助修繕、改進或現代化他們自己居住的房屋。 除其他外,貸款資金可以用於修理或更換屋頂或加熱和冷卻系統,或進行結構修復或抵消水或廢物處理連接費用。 在有限情况下,可提供高達10000美元的補助金,以消除健康或安全隱患,適用於符合條件的62歲及以上的低收入業主。 房屋維修計劃

## 電信計畫

經濟實惠的高速互聯網接入是農村美國繁榮的現代必需品。 它支持小企業、農村製造商和農業生產者,並幫助農村美國家庭、學校、企業和醫療保健提供者平等競爭。 讓農村美國人民通過可靠的寬帶服務保持聯系,有助於將新思想和創新帶給我們國家的其他地方。 這就是為什麼高速互聯網計畫是我們與農村社區合作的重要組成部分。 我們的電信計畫貸款、補助和貸款擔保幫助建立和擴展農村寬頻網路,為最需要的地區提供服務。

### 遠端教育和遠端醫療撥款 

這個有競爭性的項目幫助農村社區使用先進的電信技術來連接彼此-並與世界聯系,克服偏遠和人口密度低的影響。 這些資金可以用於購買最終用戶設備(例如互動式視頻或音訊硬體、電腦硬體、網絡組件和軟件,或類似基礎設施),用於在符合條件的區域提供遠端教育和遠端醫療服務。 資金也可以用於某些類型的教學計畫或科技援助和培訓。該補助計劃

## 宣傳冊

                    - 農村美國的繁榮夥伴 (PA-2255)
                    - 與地方政府合作共創繁榮(PA-2257)
                    - 農村美國購買、建造或修繕您的住房的合作夥伴 (PA-2254)
                    - 農村美國擴展寬帶的合作夥伴(PA-2238)
                    - 農村美國在災難恢復中的合作夥伴 (PA-2247)
                    - 遵守民权法规  (PA-2206)
                    - 你的公平住房伙伴  (PA-2265)
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 23-14241

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

JAMES TAYLOR, 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

MCCALLA RAYMER LEIBERT PIERCE, LLC, 

Foreclosure Attorney,

Defendant-Appellee.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Georgia

D.C. Docket No. 1:23-cv-00008-JRH-BKE

USCA11 Case: 23-14241 Document: 7-1 Date Filed: 06/13/2024 Page: 1 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 23-14241

____________________

Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR, and ABUDU, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:

This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction. The 30-day statutory time limit required James Taylor to file 

a notice of appeal from the district court’s May 1, 2023 final judgment on or before May 31, 2023. See 28 U.S.C. § 2107(a); Fed. R. 

App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). However, Taylor did not file a notice of appeal

until November 17, 2023.

Further, the record contains no basis for relief under Federal 

Rules of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5) or 4(a)(6) because Taylor did 

not move to extend or reopen the appeal period or indicate in his 

notice of appeal that he failed to receive formal notice of the entry 

of judgment. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) (providing that a party may 

move to extend the time for filing a notice of appeal within 30 days 

of entry of final judgment); id. R. 4(a)(6)(A) (providing that the 

court may reopen the time to file an appeal for a period of 14 days 

where a party does not receive notice of the entry of the judgment). 

Accordingly, the notice of appeal is untimely and cannot invoke 

our appellate jurisdiction. See Green v. Drug Enf’t Admin., 

606 F.3d 1296, 1300 (11th Cir. 2010).

No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies 

with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all 

other applicable rules.

USCA11 Case: 23-14241 Document: 7-1 Date Filed: 06/13/2024 Page: 2 of 2
# C_2007095EN.01003902.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/39

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 6 March 2007 — Golf USA v OHIM (GOLF USA)

(Case T-230/05) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for the Community word mark GOLF USA - Absolute grounds for refusal - Descriptive character - Lack of distinctive character)

(2007/C 95/78)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Golf USA Inc., established in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma (United States)) (represented by: A. de Bosch Kemper-de Hilster, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Laitinen and G. Schneider, agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Action against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of (OHIM) of 25 April 2005 (R 823/2004-2) refusing the application to register the word mark GOLF USA

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicant to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 205, 20.8.2005.

1

---
#### § 305.3 Sanitation and adequate facilities.

Inspection shall not be inaugurated if an establishment is not in a sanitary condition nor unless the establishment agrees to maintain a sanitary condition and provides adequate facilities for conducting such inspection.
### §521. Reserve-bank branches; establishment; directors; discontinuance of branches; approval for erection of branch bank building

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System may permit or require any Federal reserve bank to establish branch banks within the Federal reserve district in which it is located or within the district of any Federal reserve bank which may have been suspended. Such branches, subject to such rules and regulations as the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System may prescribe, shall be operated under the supervision of a board of directors to consist of not more than seven nor less than three directors, of whom a majority of one shall be appointed by the Federal reserve bank of the district, and the remaining directors by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Directors of branch banks shall hold office during the pleasure of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System may at any time require any Federal reserve bank to discontinue any branch of such Federal reserve bank established under this section. The Federal reserve bank shall thereupon proceed to wind up the business of such branch bank, subject to such rules and regulations as the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System may prescribe.

No Federal Reserve bank shall have authority hereafter to enter into any contract or contracts for the erection of any branch bank building of any kind or character or to authorize the erection of any such building, except with the approval of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

(Dec. 23, 1913, ch. 6, §3, 38 Stat. 253; June 21, 1917, ch. 32, §1, 40 Stat. 232; Feb. 25, 1927, ch. 191, §19, 44 Stat. 1234; Aug. 23, 1935, ch. 614, title II, §203(a), 49 Stat. 704; Pub. L. 87–622, §2, Aug. 31, 1962, 76 Stat. 418.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1962—Pub. L. 87–622 added par. providing that no Federal Reserve Bank shall have authority to enter into any contract for the erection of a branch bank building or to authorize the erection of such building, except with the approval of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

1927—Act Feb. 25, 1927, added par. authorizing the Federal Reserve Board to discontinue and wind up the business of branch banks.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Section 203(a) of act Aug. 23, 1935, changed name of Federal Reserve Board to Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 57 

To amend the National Trails System Act to provide for the study of the 

Pike National Historic Trail. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 8, 2019 

Mr. BENNET (for himself and Mr. GARDNER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the National Trails System Act to provide for 

the study of the Pike National Historic Trail. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pike National Historic 

5 Trail Study Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PIKE NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL STUDY. 

7 Section 5(c) of the National Trails System Act (16 

8 U.S.C. 1244(c)) is amended by adding at the end the fol9 lowing: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 57 IS

1 ‘‘(46) PIKE NATIONAL HISTORIC TRAIL.—The 

2 Pike National Historic Trail, a series of routes ex3 tending approximately 3,664 miles, which follows the 

4 route taken by Lt. Zebulon Montgomery Pike during 

5 the 1806–1807 Pike expedition that began in Fort 

6 Bellefontaine, Missouri, extended through portions 

7 of the States of Kansas, Nebraska, Colorado, New 

8 Mexico, and Texas, and ended in Natchitoches, Lou9 isiana.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
#### HEARNE’S EXECUTRIX, Movant, v. GRAM COMPANY, Opposed.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

May 16, 1939.

Wilson & Robinson for movant.

R. D. Davis, opposed.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal denied; judgment affirmed.
#### §§ 317.310-317.311 [Reserved]
#### § 590.960 Small importations for importer's personal use, display, or laboratory analysis.

Egg products (other than those that are forbidden entry by other Federal law or regulation) from any country, that are exclusively for the importer's personal use, display, or laboratory analysis, and not for sale or distribution; that are sound, healthful, wholesome, and fit for human food; and that are not adulterated and do not contain any substance not permitted by the Act or regulations, may be admitted into the United States without a foreign inspection certificate. Such products are not required to be inspected upon arrival in the United States and may be shipped to the importer without further restriction under this part, except as provided in 9 CFR 590.925(b), provided that the Department may, with respect to any specific importation, require that the importer certify that such product is exclusively for said importer's personal use, display, or laboratory analysis and not for sale or distribution. The amount of liquid, frozen, or dried egg products imported must not exceed 50 pounds.