alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010209EN.01004301.xml

| 31.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/43

---

Action brought on 21 May 2010 — Merlin and Others v OHIM — Dusyma (Games)

(Case T-231/10)

()

2010/C 209/66

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Merlin Handelsgesellschaft mbH (Forchtenberg, Germany), Rolf Krämer (Forchtenberg), BLS Basteln, Lernen, Spielen GmbH (Forchtenberg), Andreas Hohl (Künzelsau, Germany), represented by: R. Kramer, lawyer

Applicants:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Dusyma Kindergartenbedarf GmbH (Schorndorf, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | annul the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 17 March 2010 in Case R 879/2009-3 and declare Community design No 526 801-0011 invalid; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 17 March 2010 in Case R 879/2009-3 and declare Community design No 526 801-0011 invalid;

| — | in the alternative, annul the decision of the Third Board of Appeal and refer the case back to the Board of Appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, annul the decision of the Third Board of Appeal and refer the case back to the Board of Appeal;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community design in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: Community design No 526 801-0011 for the products ‘Games (including educational games)’.

Registered Community design in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: Dusyma Kindergartenbedarf GmbH.

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity: the Applicants.

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Rejection of the application for a declaration of invalidity.

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 3 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 (1) on Community designs, because the Board of Appeal misinterpreted the provisions of that article concerning definitions and did not take into consideration the fact that a Community design can also consist in the appearance of a part of a product.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 of 12 December 2001 on Community designs (OJ 2002 L 3, p. 1).

1

---
**Exhibit10.23**

 
| THE KAMINER GROUP |   | PUBLIC     |
|-------------------|--------|------------|
|              |   | RELATIONS  |
|              |   | AND        |
|              |   | COUNSELING |

 
| Date:    |   | February  9, 2006                                                         |
|----------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| To:      |   | Steve  Rash                                                               |
| From:    |   | David  A. Kaminer                                                         |
| Subject: |   | Public/Investor  Relations Counseling Agreement with Power3 Medical Group |

 

This*Public/Investor Relations Counseling Agreement*confirms**that The Kaminer Group (“TKG”) has been retained by Power3Medical Products, Inc. (“Power3”) to create and implement programs designed to generateawareness, credibility, media coverage, and interest from strategic partnersand investors.

 

Thisagreement covers a 12-month period commencing January 2006 through December2006, and may be terminated by either party (after a guaranteed three-monthstartup period) by a one-month written notice.

 

**Public/InvestorRelations Efforts**

 

TKGhas commenced activities with Power3, including writing, editing anddistributing press materials, providing counseling, taking part in senior-levelmeetings, and taking calls from and providing input to Power3 investors.

 

Otheractivities will include, but not be limited to:

 

•         Identifyingand establishing on-going working relationship with target media on Power3’s;

•         Developingpress materials, with input from Power3, and following through with businessand trade media;

•         Professionallyresponding to inquires from media and investors, through phone calls and e-mail.

 

**Fees and Expenses**

TKGandPower3 have agreed to a monthly retainer fee of $3,000 in cash, billed anddue the first of each month. TKG will also receive the equivalent of $2,000.00in options per month to purchase PWRM shares, at the average daily closing marketprice for shares the previous month.

 

Inaddition, Power3 will be billed without markupfor expenses incurred onits behalf, including telephone, press release distribution, travel, lodging,media entertainment, facsimile and copying services, postage, overnight and/orlocal delivery, etc. Expenses are billed at month’s end, due on receipt.

 

Agreedto:

 
| /s/:  David A. Kaminer |                           | /s/:  Steven B. Rash |   |
|------------------------|--------------------------------|----------------------|--------|
| David  A. Kaminer      | Steven  B. Rash                |
| The  Kaminer Group     | Power3  Medical Services, Inc. |

 

108 RALPH AVENUE $WHITE PLAINS, NY 10606-3812

(914) 684-1934 $FAX (914) 206-4128 $ dkaminer@kamgrp.com

 

----
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE ALBERTO CEVALLOSRODRIGUEZ, AKA Jose Alberto

Ceballos, AKA Jose Alberto Cevallo,

 Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 13-70576

Agency No. A095-733-040

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 21, 2015** 

Before: CANBY, BEA, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Jose Alberto Cevallos-Rodriguez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his

motion to reopen. We dismiss the petition for review.

FILED

JUL 27 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s determination that the evidence

Cevallos-Rodriguez submitted with his motion to reopen does not establish a prima

facie case of exceptional and extremely unusual hardship for the purposes of

cancellation of removal, where the evidence Cevallos-Rodriguez presented with his

motion concerned the same hardship grounds as his application for cancellation of

removal in his original removal proceedings. See Fernandez v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d

592, 601 (9th Cir. 2006) (“If . . . the BIA determines that a motion to reopen

proceedings in which there has already been an unreviewable discretionary

determination concerning a statutory prerequisite to relief does not make out a

prima facie case for that relief, [8 U.S.C.] § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i) precludes our visiting

the merits, just as it would if the BIA had affirmed the [immigration judge] on

direct appeal.”).

Because the BIA’s determination that Cevallos-Rodriguez did not

demonstrate a prima facie case of the requisite hardship is dispositive, we do not

reach Cevallos-Rodriguez’ remaining contentions. See Simeonov v. Ashcroft, 371

F.3d 532, 538 (9th Cir. 2004) (“As a general rule courts and agencies are not

required to make findings on issues the decision of which is unnecessary to the

results they reach.” (citation and quotation marks omitted)). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

2 13-70576
# C_2011046EN.01001601.xml

| 12.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/16

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 21 December 2010 — Lorenzo v European Social and Economic Committee

(Case F-29/10) (1)

1

2011/C 46/30

Language of the case: French

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 179, 3.7.2010, p. 59.

1

---
# C_2011238EN.01001701.xml

| 13.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 238/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 238/17

---

Order of the General Court of 21 June 2011 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case T-12/10 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Reimbursement of expenses - Note of the Commission informing the applicant of its intention to make a deduction from his invalidity allowance - Lack of any measure adversely affecting the appellant - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)

2011/C 238/28

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and C. Berardis-Kayser, acting as Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the order of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 29 October 2009 in Case F-94/08 Marcuccio v Commission, not yet published in the ECR, seeking the annulment of that order.

Marcuccio

Commission

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Mr Luigi Marcuccio shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission at the present instance. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Luigi Marcuccio shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission at the present instance.

---

(1)  OJ C 63, 13.3.2010.

1

---
465 California Street 

Suite 210 

San Francisco 

California 94104 

' 

(415) 421·2500 

Fox (415) 421·2560 

'>'.'Ww.avialex.com 

law@avialcx.com 

Michael L. Dworkin and Associates 

Law Offices 

VIA FAX and Regular Mail: 

Hearing Docket, AGC-430 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W, 

Wilbur Wright Building, Suite 2W1 000 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

(FAX: 1-202-493-5142) 

The Honorable J. E. Sullivan 

Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building, Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

(FAX: 1-202-366-7536) 

David F. Shayne, Esq. 

Enforcement DivisioJJ,, Wef,tem Team 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Avenue, SW 

Renton, WA 98057 

(FAX: 1-425-227-1007 and 

Email: david.fshayne@faa.gov) · 

September 26,2016 

•~-~,- , ·=;, r~~" ~,_,. f""" - . r t"-' I I \/ E D ~ ~ T ' . ._, • 

OCT 0 3 2016 

!-!.Fi' nil\iG DOCKET 

RE: TANGO AIR, INC., d/b/a SCHUBACH AVIATION 

FAA Docket No. FAA-2015-3317 

.· , , F,AA1C:as.l1 No •. 2.Ql5WP090037 

Dear Ladies and G~ntlemen: 

The parties have agreed to settle this matter. 

By this letter, Tango Air, Inc., dib/a Schubach Aviation, withdraws its 

request for hearing and requests that this proceeding be terminated. 
Hearing Docket Clerk, judge Sullivan and David F. Shayne, Esq. 

Re: Tango Air, Inc., djbja Schubach Aviation 

September 26, 2016 

Page 2 

This request does not constitute, nor be deemed to constitute, an admission 

by Tango Air of the matters alleged in the FAA's Complaint, or in the FAA's 

forthcoming Order Assessing Civil Penalty, which Tango Air continues to deny. 

We trust that an appropriate Order Terminating Proceeding will be issued. 

Respectfully submitted, 

cc: Tango Air, Inc., dfb/a Schubach Aviation
C 

2015 Reinsurance Data 

National Totals By Fund 

As of 10/2019 

Fund Gross Liability Gross Premium Gross Indemnity Retained Liability * 

A 15,300,834,745 1,919,451,761 1,732,236,121 2,861,256,098 

86,438,656,801 7,537,047,227 4,485,909,378 80,614,235,140 

Total 101,739,491,546 9,456,498,988 6,218,145,499 83,475,491,238 

Footnotes: * Includes 6.5% Net Book Quota Share. 

Retained Premium * Retaine

358,937,472 

7,019,405,742 7,378,343,213 

Page 1 of 1
# C_2011055EN.01002401.xml

| 19.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/24

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 7 December 2010 — ArcelorMittal Wire France and Others v Commission

(Case T-385/10 R)

(Application for interim measures - Competition - Commission decision imposing a fine - Bank guarantee - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Financial loss - Absence of exceptional circumstances - No urgency)

2011/C 55/43

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: ArcelorMittal Wire France (Bourg-en-Bresse, France); ArcelorMittal Fontaine (Fontaine-l’Évêque, Belgium); and ArcelorMittal Verderio Srl (Verderio Inferiore, Italy) (represented by: H. Calvet, O. Billard and M. Pittie, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Giolito, L. Parpala and V. Bottka, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of Article 2 of Commission Decision C(2010) 4387 final, of 30 June 2010, relating to a proceeding under Article 101 [TFEU] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38.344 — Prestressing steel), as amended by Commission Decision C(2010) 6676 final of 30 September 2010.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed;

| 2. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Costs are reserved.

---
#### § 77.21 Applicability of this subpart.

All references in this subpart to the tuberculosis status of States and zones pertain to such status for captive cervids.
§ 50.18 Identification and disposal of cattle. ( a ) All dairy cattle disposed of under this subpart must travel from the premises of origin to their final destination with an approved metal eartag, supplied by APHIS or the State representative, bearing a serial number and attached to each animal's left ear.
( b ) Dairy cattle disposed of under this subpart must be shipped under permit either: ( 1 ) Directly to slaughter at a Federal or State inspected slaughtering establishment; or
( 2 ) Under permit directly to a livestock market and, under the supervision of an APHIS representative or State representative, through a livestock market pen that is dedicated to and marked exclusively for use for animals moved to slaughter, and then directly to slaughter at a Federal or State inspected slaughtering establishment.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0193)
#### § 555.2 Fish product transported within the United States as part of export movement.

When any shipment of any fish product is offered to any carrier for transportation within the United States as a part of an export movement, the same certificate shall be required as if the shipment were destined to a point within the United States.
# C_2012174EN.01002101.xml

| 16.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 174/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 174/21

---

Judgment of the General Court of 3 May 2012 — Conceria Kara v OHIM — Dima (KARRA)

(Case T-270/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark KARRA - Earlier national and Community figurative marks Kara - Company name Conceria Kara Srl and trade name Kara - Relative grounds for refusal - First sentence of Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 8 of the Paris Convention - Bad faith)

2012/C 174/32

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Conceria Kara Srl (Trezzano sul Naviglio, Italy) (represented by P. Picciolini, lawyer)

Applicant

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by G. Mannucci, agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Dima — Gida Tekstil Deri Insaat Maden Turizm Orman Urünleri Sanayi Ve Ticaret Ltd Sti (Istanbul, Turkey)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 March 2010 (Case R 1172/2009-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Conceria Kara Srl and Dima — Gida Tekstil Deri Insaat Maden Turizm Orman Urünleri Sanayi Ve Ticaret Ltd Sti.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Conceria Kara Srl to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Conceria Kara Srl to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 221, 14.8.2010.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 7 (Tuesday, January 11, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 1660]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-363]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7289]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Art in Cameroon: Sculptural Dialogues''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000, I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Art in Cameroon: Sculptural Dialogues,'' 
imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, 
are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Neuberger 
Museum of Art, Purchase, NY, from on or about April 23, 2011, until on 
or about August 14, 2011, and at possible additional exhibitions or 
venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice 
of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the Federal 
Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202/632-6473). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-
5, L/PD, Fifth Floor, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: January 4, 2011.
Ann Stock,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-363 Filed 1-10-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Performance &accountability report.**
 
SuDoc Number:FT 1.1/5:

Item Number:0533-A-05 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000602364
 
2003| 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009
2010| 2011 | 2012 |2013
 
April 29, 2020
| **INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS (Details Textual) (USD $)** | 9 Months Ended |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
||
| Income Loss Not Recognized Under Equity Method Accounting           | $ 59,631       | $ 142,244 |
| Series One [Member]                                                 |           |   |
| Income Loss Not Recognized Under Equity Method Accounting           | 0              | 0 |
| Series Two [Member]                                                 |           |   |
| Income Loss Not Recognized Under Equity Method Accounting           | 0              | 0 |
| Series Three [Member]                                               |           |   |
| Income Loss Not Recognized Under Equity Method Accounting           | 59,631         | 142,244 |
| Series Four [Member]                                                |           |   |
| Income Loss Not Recognized Under Equity Method Accounting           | 0              | 0 |
| Series Five [Member]                                                |           |   |
| Income Loss Not Recognized Under Equity Method Accounting           | 0              | 0 |
| Series Six [Member]                                                 |           |   |
| Income Loss Not Recognized Under Equity Method Accounting           | $ 0            | $ 0 |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Amount of income loss not recognized under equity method accounting.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**bctc_IncomeLossNotRecognizedUnderEquityMethodAccounting**Namespace Prefix:**bctc_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**credit**Period Type:**duration |
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-1972

In re: FRANK TERALD HOGUE, II,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:15-cr-00037-WO-2; 1:16-cv-01079-WO-LPA)

Submitted: December 20, 2018 Decided: December 26, 2018

Before DIAZ and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frank Terald Hogue, II, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Frank Terald Hogue, II, petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district 

court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and other related 

motions. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review 

of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court denied relief on Hogue’s 

motions on October 17, 2018. Accordingly, because the district court has recently 

decided Hogue’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED