alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 20-12852

____________________

In re: LYNN ANN MARTIN, 

Debtor.

___________________________________________________

LYNN ANN MARTIN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

PHILIP MARTIN, 

Defendant-Appellee.

USCA11 Case: 20-12852 Date Filed: 10/08/2021 Page: 1 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 20-12852

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

D.C. Docket No. 0:19-cv-60651-RAR

____________________

Before WILSON, ROSENBAUM, and HULL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Lynn Ann Martin appeals the district court’s affirmance of the bankruptcy court’s order denying her motion for 

relief from the automatic stay (“Motion for Relief from Stay”), 

pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 362(b)(2)(A)(iv) and 541(c)(2). After careful review of the briefs and the record, and with the benefit of oral 

argument, we find no reversible error.

AFFIRMED.

USCA11 Case: 20-12852 Date Filed: 10/08/2021 Page: 2 of 2
II 

Calendar No. 487 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 685 

To amend the Inspector General Act of 1978 relative to the powers of 

the Department of Justice Inspector General. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 6, 2019 

Mr. LEE (for himself, Mr. GRASSLEY, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Mrs. BLACKBURN, 

Mr. RUBIO, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mr. KENNEDY, Ms. 

HIRONO, Mr. WYDEN, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. CRUZ, Mr. 

LEAHY, and Mr. COONS) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

JUNE 29, 2020 

Reported by Mr. GRAHAM, without amendment 

A BILL 

To amend the Inspector General Act of 1978 relative to 

the powers of the Department of Justice Inspector General. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Inspector General Ac5 cess Act of 2019’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 685 RS

1 SEC. 2. INVESTIGATIONS OF DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

2 PERSONNEL. 

3 Section 8E of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 

4 U.S.C. App.) is amended— 

5 (1) in subsection (b)— 

6 (A) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘and 

7 paragraph (3)’’; 

8 (B) by striking paragraph (3); 

9 (C) by redesignating paragraphs (4) and 

10 (5) as paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively; and 

11 (D) in paragraph (4), as redesignated, by 

12 striking ‘‘paragraph (4)’’ and inserting ‘‘para13 graph (3)’’; and 

14 (2) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘, except with 

15 respect to allegations described in subsection 

16 (b)(3),’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS

pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 487 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 685 

A BILL 

To amend the Inspector General Act of 1978 relInspector General. ative to the powers of the Department of Justice 

JUNE 29, 2020 

Reported without amendment 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
### §3712. Personnel exchanges

The Secretary, the Secretary of Energy, and the Director of the National Science Foundation, jointly, shall establish a program to foster the exchange of scientific and technical personnel among academia, industry, and Federal laboratories. Such program shall include both (1) federally supported exchanges and (2) efforts to stimulate exchanges without Federal funding.

(Pub. L. 96–480, §20, formerly §13, Oct. 21, 1980, 94 Stat. 2320; renumbered §17, Pub. L. 99–502, §2, Oct. 20, 1986, 100 Stat. 1785; renumbered §16, Pub. L. 99–502, §9(e)(1), Oct. 20, 1986, 100 Stat. 1797; renumbered §17, Pub. L. 100–107, §3(a), Aug. 20, 1987, 101 Stat. 725; renumbered §18, Pub. L. 100–418, title V, §5122(a)(1), Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1438; renumbered §20, Pub. L. 102–240, title VI, §6019, Dec. 18, 1991, 105 Stat. 2183; Pub. L. 109–58, title X, §1009(c), Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 936.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2005—Pub. L. 109–58 substituted ", the Secretary of Energy, and the Director of the National Science Foundation" for "and the National Science Foundation".
#### § 590.40 Egg products not intended for human food.

Periodic inspections will be made at any plant processing egg products which are not intended for use as human food of its operations and records to ensure compliance with the Act and the regulations in this part. Egg products not intended for use as human food shall be denatured or decharacterized prior to being offered for sale or transportation and identified as prescribed by the regulations in this part to prevent their use as human food.

[85 FR 68674, Oct. 29, 2020]
### **CHAPTER 87A—NATIONAL DO-NOT-CALL REGISTRY**

Sec.
6151.
National do-not-call registry.
6152.
Telemarketing Sales Rule; do-not-call registry fees.
6153.
Federal Communications Commission do-not-call regulations.
6154.
Reporting requirements.
6155.
Prohibition of expiration date.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

This chapter is comprised principally of Pub. L. 108–10, Mar. 11, 2003, 117 Stat. 557, which was formerly set out as a note under section 6101 of this title.
Fund Gross Liability Gross Premium Gross Indemnity Retained Liability * Retained Premium * Retaine

A 21,292,087,373 3,556,820,068 6,240,200,387 3,981,620,348 665,125,355 C 151,963,947,203 14,828,983,745 13,404,327,487 142,053,811,450 13,856,272,823 Total 173,256,034,576 18,385,803,813 19,644,527,874 146,035,431,798 14,521,398,178 

Footnotes: * Includes 6.5% Net Book Quota Share.

2022 Reinsurance Data

National Totals By Fund

As of 03/2024

Page 1 of 1
Case 1:04-cv-21448-ASG Document 404-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/14/2010 Page 1 of 8Case 1:04-cv-21448-ASG Document 404-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/14/2010 Page 2 of 8Case 1:04-cv-21448-ASG Document 404-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/14/2010 Page 3 of 8Case 1:04-cv-21448-ASG Document 404-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/14/2010 Page 4 of 8Case 1:04-cv-21448-ASG Document 404-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/14/2010 Page 5 of 8Case 1:04-cv-21448-ASG Document 404-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/14/2010 Page 6 of 8Case 1:04-cv-21448-ASG Document 404-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/14/2010 Page 7 of 8Case 1:04-cv-21448-ASG Document 404-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/14/2010 Page 8 of 8
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-2665

___________

Andrea R. Brown, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

* Appeal from the United States

City of Little Rock, Arkansas, and * District Court for the

its agency Finance Department; * Eastern District of Arkansas.

John Pryor, Director, in his official *

capacity; Gary Davis, Accounting * [UNPUBLISHED]

and Reporting Manager, in his *

official capacity; Lynn Umholtz, *

Supervisor, in her official capacity, *

*

Appellees.

___________

 Submitted: April 22, 1998

 Filed: April 24, 1998

___________

Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit

Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.
The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the

1

Eastern District of Arkansas.

-2-

Andrea Brown appeals from the District Court’s grant of summary judgment for 1

defendants in her employment discrimination action. After carefully reviewing the

record and the parties’ submissions, we deny Brown’s motion for appointment of

counsel, and conclude the District Court did not commit error in granting summary

judgment for the reasons it stated. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### § 1301.32 Penalties.

Section 552a(i), Title 5, United States Code provides that:

(1) *Criminal Penalties.* Any officer or employee of an agency, who by virtue of his employment or official position, has possession of, or access to, agency records which contain individually identifiable information the disclosure of which is prohibited by this section or by rules or regulations established thereunder, and who knowing that disclosure of the specific material is so prohibited, willfully discloses the material in any manner to any person or agency not entitled to receive it, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and fined not more than $5,000.

(2) Any officer or employee of any agency who willfully maintains a system of records without meeting the notice requirements of subsection (e)(4) of this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and fined not more than $5,000.

(3) Any person who knowingly and willfully requests or obtains any record concerning an individual from an agency under false pretenses shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and fined not more than $5,000.

[40 FR 45313, Oct. 1, 1975. Redesignated at 44 FR 30682, May 29, 1979, and further redesignated at 82 FR 51757, Nov. 8, 2017]
**Exhibit 31.1****Chief Executive Officer Certification**I, John G. Duffy, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 of KBW, Inc. (the “Registrant”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of,and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controlsand procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financialreporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theRegistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or causedsuch internal control over financial reporting to be designed underour supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding thereliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this quarterly report based on suchevaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofRegistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.Date: May 7, 2008/s/ JOHN G. DUFFY
# C_2010246EN.01003501.xml

| 11.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/35

---

Action brought on 16 July 2010 — European Commission v Ireland

(Case C-356/10)

()

2010/C 246/59

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: S. Walker, D. Kukovec, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Ireland

Defendant:

The applicant claims that the Court should:

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Declare that, in the context of the award procedure by the Department of Agriculture and Food for a public supply contract for animal identification tags, concerning the application of criteria relating to tenderers’ ability to perform the contract in question as award criteria, instead of selection criteria, Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 53 of Directive 2004/18/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, in the context of the award procedure by the Department of Agriculture and Food for a public supply contract for animal identification tags, concerning the application of criteria relating to tenderers’ ability to perform the contract in question as award criteria, instead of selection criteria, Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 53 of Directive 2004/18/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts;

1

| — | order Ireland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Ireland to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Commission submits that the award criteria applied by the Department of Agriculture and Food included criteria reserved for the selection stage, namely criteria relating to tenderers’ ability to perform the contract in question and that, consequently, Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 53 of Directive 2004/18/EC.

---

(1)  OJ L 134, p. 114

1

---
#### § 309.10 Onset of parturition.

Any livestock showing signs of the onset of parturition shall be withheld from slaughter until after parturition and passage of the placenta. Slaughter or other disposition may then be permitted if the animal is otherwise acceptable.
Basic Recordkeeping Aid for Direct Marketed Commodities

1. INSURED’S NAME 2. DATE

3. NAME OF MARKET 4. TOTAL CASH RECEIPTS

5. CROP 6. ESTIMATED PERCENT 

OF TOTAL CASH 

RECEIPTS

7. REVENUE PER CROP 

8. TOTAL 100%

9. Remarks
This is an aid that can be used to record daily direct-market sales. This is not a required form. 

It is intended as an example of how daily sales could be recorded in a way that is acceptable for 

WFRP purposes during the year in order to accurately complete the Final Farm Operation 

Report. This version does not provide the information needed to allow the producer to calculate 

a 3-year average farm price for future use for WFRP insurance.

Item Required Element Description

1 Insured’s Name Name of insured as shown on the application

2 Date Date the commodity was taken to market

3 Name Of Market Name of the market where the commodity was sold.

4 Total Cash Receipts Total cash receipts for the day from all commodities taken 

to the market.

5 Commodity Name of the commodity. If there are multiple types of a 

commodity that have different sale prices, each commodity 

should be listed on a separate line,

6 Estimated Percent of 

Total Cash Receipts

Insured’s estimate of the percent of the total revenue 

obtained from the commodity. Total of all percent must 

equal 100%.

7 Revenue Per Crop Revenue from the commodity sold for the day (Item 6 X 

Item 4).

8 Total Total amount of revenue from the sale of all commodities 

for the day. This amount must match the entry in item 4 

above.

9 Remarks Enter any remarks pertinent to the sale of the commodities.
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of B+H Ocean Carriers Ltd.; (the
“Company”) for the year ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael S. Hudner,
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer and Class A
Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350, as
adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d), of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

















Date:       May
19,2008                                                By:    /s/Michael S.
Hudner





Michael S. Hudner


Chairman of the
Board, President and


Chief Executive
Officer








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002- continued --------------------------








In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of B+H Ocean Carriers Ltd.; (the
“Company”) for the year ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael S. Hudner,
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer and Class A
Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350, as
adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d), of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

















Date:May 19,
2008                                                By:    /s/R.
Anthony Dalzell





R. Anthony
Dalzell


Treasurer and Chief
Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT32.1**

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report of Prospect MedicalHoldings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007(the “Report”), I, Jacob Y. Terner, M.D., Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| May  15, 2007 | /s/ JACOB Y. TERNER           |   |
|---------------|-------------------------------|--------|
|          | **Jacob Y. Terner, M.D.**     |
|          | **Chairman of the Board and** |
|          | **Chief Executive Officer**   |

 

----
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Eachof the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of August TechnologyCorporation (the “Company”), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adoptedpursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of hisknowledge:

 

(1)                                  The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period endedSeptember 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: November 9, 2005 |                    |
|-----------------------------|-------------------------|
|                        | /s/ Jeff L. O’Dell |   |
|                        | Jeff L. O’Dell     |
|                        | Chief Executive Officer |
|                        |                    |
|                        |                    |
|                        | /s/ Stanley D. Piekos   |   |
|                        | Stanley D. Piekos       |
|                        | Chief Financial Officer |
|                             |                         |  |  |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to August Technology Corporation and will be retained by August Technology Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2011080EN.01002002.xml

| 12.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 80/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 80/20

---

Action brought on 28 December 2010 — Almunia Textil v OHIM — FIBA Europe (EuroBasket)

(Case T-596/10)

2011/C 80/39

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Almunia Textil, SA (La Almunia de Doña Godina, Spain) (represented by: J. E. Astiz Suárez, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: FIBA Europe eV (Munich, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 6 October 2010 in Case R 280/2010-1. |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 6 October 2010 in Case R 280/2010-1.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: FIBA Europe eV.

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘EuroBasket’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 14, 16, 24, 25, 26, 28, 35, 38 and 41.

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Almunia Textil, SA.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community and national figurative marks containing the word element ‘Basket’, for goods in Classes 18, 25 and 28.

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld in part and Community trade mark application rejected in part for goods in Classes 9, 25, 28 and 41.

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal allowed and opposition rejected.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, (1) since there is a likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

1

---