alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1312.21 Surveys and schedules. ( a ) The Secretaries of the Interior, Agriculture, and Defense and the Chairman of the Board of the Tennessee Valley Authority will develop plans for surveying lands under each agency's control to determine the nature and extent of archaeological resources pursuant to section 14(a) of the Act. Such activities should be consistent with Federal agency planning policies and other historic preservation program responsibilities required by 16 U.S.C. 470 *et seq.* Survey plans prepared under this section will be designed to comply with the purpose of the Act regarding the protection of archaeological resources.
( b ) The Secretaries of the Interior, Agriculture, and Defense and the Chairman of the Tennessee Valley Authority will prepare schedules for surveying lands under each agency's control that are likely to contain the most scientifically valuable archaeological resources pursuant to section 14(b) of the Act. Such schedules will be developed based on objectives and information identified in survey plans described in paragraph (a) of this section and implemented systematically to cover areas where the most scientifically valuable archaeological resources are likely to exist.
( c ) Guidance for the activities undertaken as part of paragraphs (a) through (b) of this section is provided by the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation.
( d ) Other Federal land managing agencies are encouraged to develop plans for surveying lands under their jurisdictions and prepare schedules for surveying to improve protection and management of archaeological resources.
( e ) The Secretaries of the Interior, Agriculture, and Defense and the Chairman of the Tennessee Valley Authority will develop a system for documenting and reporting suspected violations of the various provisions of the Act. This system will reference a set of procedures for use by officers, employees, or agents of Federal agencies to assist them in recognizing violations, documenting relevant evidence, and reporting assembled information to the appropriate authorities. Methods employed to document and report such violations should be compatible with existing agency reporting systems for documenting violations of other appropriate Federal statutes and regulations. Summary information to be included in the Secretary's comprehensive report will be based upon the system developed by each Federal land manager for documenting suspected violations.
[60 FR 5259, 5261, Jan. 26, 1995]
Exhibit 24.2

POWER-OF-ATTORNEY    Annual Reports on Form 10-K of  Financial Security Assurance Holdings Ltd.

The undersigned, as a director of Financial Security Assurance Holdings Ltd., a New York corporation (the "Company"), and/or, as applicable, as an officer
of the Company, does hereby constitute and appoint each of Robert P. Cochran, Séan W. McCarthy and Bruce E. Stern to be his agent and attorney-in-fact, with the
power to act fully hereunder and with full power of substitution to act in the name and on behalf of the undersigned, (i) to sign in the name and on behalf of the undersigned, as a director
and/or officer of the Company, as applicable, and file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, an Annual Report on Form 10-K for each fiscal year for which the Company is
required to file such an Annual Report, and any amendments or supplements thereto, and (ii) to execute and deliver any instruments, certificates or other documents which he shall deem necessary
or proper in connection with the filing of each such Annual Report on Form 10-K, and any such amendment or supplement thereto, and generally to act for and in the name of the
undersigned with respect to each such filing as fully as could the undersigned if then personally present and acting. The foregoing Power-of-Attorney shall be in full force and
effect for so long as the undersigned shall be a director or officer of the Company, as applicable, unless and until revoked as to the undersigned by written instrument delivered by him to the
Secretary of the Company.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Power-of-Attorney on June 14, 2007.

| |  | /s/JOHN WIGGLESWORTH EVERETSJohn Wigglesworth Everets
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
# C_2011238EN.01003602.xml

| 13.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 238/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 238/36

---

Order of the General Court of 20 June 2011 — Iberdrola v Commission

(Case T-486/10) (1)

1

2011/C 238/63

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 328, 4.12.2010.

1

---
§ 317.300 Nutrition labeling of meat and meat food products. ( a ) Nutrition labeling must be provided for all meat and meat food products intended for human consumption and offered for sale, except single-ingredient, raw meat products that are not ground or chopped meat products described in § 317.301 and are not major cuts of single-ingredient, raw meat products identified in § 317.344, unless the product is exempted under § 317.400 . Nutrition labeling must be provided for the major cuts of single-ingredient, raw meat products identified in § 317.344, either in accordance with the provisions of § 317.309 for nutrition labels, or in accordance with the provisions of § 317.345 for point-of-purchase materials, except as exempted under § 317.400. For all other products for which nutrition labeling is required, including ground or chopped meat products described in § 317.301, nutrition labeling must be provided in accordance with the provisions of § 317.309, except as exempted under § 317.400.
( b ) Nutrition labeling may be provided for single-ingredient, raw meat products that are not ground or chopped meat products described in § 317.301 and that are not major cuts of single-ingredient, raw meat products identified in § 317.344, either in accordance with the provisions of § 317.309 for nutrition labels, or in accordance with the provisions of § 317.345 for point-of-purchase materials.
[75 FR 82164, Dec. 29, 2010]
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 645 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide for the inclusion of 

homeschooled students in Junior Reserve Officer’s Training Corps units. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 5, 2019 

Mr. COTTON (for himself and Mr. JONES) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide for the 

inclusion of homeschooled students in Junior Reserve 

Officer’s Training Corps units. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INCLUSION OF HOMESCHOOLED STUDENTS IN 

4 JUNIOR RESERVE OFFICER’S TRAINING 

5 CORPS UNITS. 

6 Section 2031 of title 10, United States Code, is 

7 amended by adding at the end the following new sub8 section: 

9 ‘‘(g)(1) Each public secondary educational institution 

10 that maintains a unit under this section shall permit memVerDate Sep 11 2014 02:00 Mar 09, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S645.IS S645

pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 645 IS

1 bership in the unit to homeschooled students residing in 

2 the area served by the institution who are qualified for 

3 membership in the unit (but for lack of enrollment in the 

4 institution). 

5 ‘‘(2) A student who is a member of a unit pursuant 

6 to this subsection shall count toward the satisfaction by 

7 the institution concerned of the requirement in subsection 

8 (b)(1) relating to the minimum number of student mem9 bers in the unit necessary for the continuing maintenance 

10 of the unit.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
1 

### Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 8:39 AM

To: 'eisenman.ryan@gmail.com'

Cc: Pappas, Rob (FAA); Pearson, Lakisha (FAA); C ooper, Thuy (FAA); Ferritto, Michelle (FAA) Subject: Request for Additional Information



### December 29, 2014

Mr. Ryan J. Eisenman

President and Senior sUAS Pilot Yes Please Company dba Blue Heaven Productions

407 West Riverside Drive Jupiter, FL 33469

Dear Mr. Eisenman:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2014-0735). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration to process your petition. Please submit the additional information to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Headqua rters or electronically via e-mail to nia.daniels@faa.gov

.

 Describe the aircraft make and model for the prop osed UAS operation. The description should include

the size.

 List the aircraft’s cruise speed.

 Provide information regarding the radio frequency sp ectrum. This information can be located in the

aircraft manual.

 Provide description of proximity to airports.

 Your petition references a pre-fli ght inspection. Describe the process used to determine if the UAS is airworthy and in safe conditi on for operation in the NAS.

 Your petition references an aircraft operations manual; however, it was not submitted for the record. Please provide a copy of the manual.

Please provide the additional information by January 12, 2014.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-7626.

Sincerely,2 Nia Daniels, ARM

‐ 108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075 nia.daniels@faa.gov
p.1 

OAR Box 1787 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

11) ll-C-35 

Docket Number: 

A-90-37 

Printed 11/4/2008 10:22:19 AM Sheet 77 of 147 
P.2 

'% 

15SB 

^ 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711 

A-fO-sy 

JJ -C-3S 

13 JUM 1989 

Mr. Henry V. Nickel 

Hunton and Williams 

Post Office Box 19230 

Washington, D.C. 20036 

Dear Mr. Nickel: 

M 2 5 

X- »•"* "i^r»ti, » L'- ^ v 

IL

 |"|

"*—|—rrwrr rwn i nic 'in . • , 

'. * 

This is in response to your May 11, 1989 letter to Administrator 

William Reilly regarding the development of implementation guidance for the 

Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) "top-down" process for determining 

best available control technology (BACT). Specifically, you wish to be kept 

apprised of any action EPA takes in response to the American Paper Institute 

(API) and the National Forest Products Association (NFPA) petition requesting 

EPA to immediately rescind its policy regarding the top-down process and take 

certain other administrative actions. 

On May 12, 1989, EPA issued a response denying the API/NFPA petition on 

the grounds that the top-down BACT process is neither at variance with the 

statutory definition nor does it constitute a revision to the prevention of 

significant deterioration regulations. A copy of the response is enclosed. 

The EPA has prepared (in draft form) a separate summary of the top-down 

process. The summary is currently under review by the EPA Regional Offices 

and representatives of State and local air pollution control agencies. A 

background statement on top-down BACT, discussing the origins of and rationale 

for the policy initiative, has also been prepared by EPA. Both of these 

documents have been transmitted to API/NFPA, and a copy of each is enclosed. 

As requested, we will keep you apprised of any subsequent action EPA 

takes in regard to the API/NFPA petition. 

John Calcagni 

Director 

.irX)uality Management Di 

Enclosures 
P.3 

For enclosures to docket item II-C-7, June 13, 1989 letter from John Calcagni to Henry V. 

Nickel, see docket items indicated. 

II-C-3 May 12, 1989 response denying the API/NFPA petition. 

II-C-4 May 25, 1989 'Draft "Top-Down" Best Available Control Technology: A 

Summary' 

II-B-15 "Background Statement on the EPA's Top-Down Policy"
p.1 

OAR Box 1384 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

119) ll-E-79 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:07 AM Sheet 119 of264 
P.2 

w/v-i/o i nc v ±*.D£ rAA tfUO 11 1 22QY 

05 20/97 U8:.11 ©19199410234 

WUiSTlGlOUS ACC 

PES RTP NC 

To-' 

@001 

[g] 003/003 

A-94-52 

11- E 7? 

Contact Report 

I From: Melanie ProctorJ Pacific Environmental Services, Inc. (PES) 

Date: October 30,1996 

Contact: Mr. Thomas Jones, Production Manager 

Company: Prestigious Accessories 

Telephone Number: (903) 877-2093 

Fax Number: (903) 877-2287 

Contact Summary: 

Prestigious Accessories was contacted to verify the content of hazardous air pollutants 

(HAP) in the resins reported in a 1993 mdustry survey. Mr. Marvin Han was listed on that 

survey as the facility contact. However. Mr. Hart was not available at the time and I was referred 

to Mr. Jones who is the production manager at Prestigious Accessories. 

Mr. Jones explained that Prestigious Accessories uses only two resius, which contain 31 

to 33 percent HAP by Weight. One resin, which accounts for 95 percent of all resin used an the 

facility, is vapor suppressed. The other xesin, which is only used for mold making, is not vapor 

suppressed. After receiving the resins from the supplier, Prestigious Accessories does not add 

any additional HAP to the resin. 

INFORMATIONS ACCURATE 

MAP Canrcn * IS O-PPfcOXQ/na+eL 3fe % hy u^ijrTr-; 

CLII (dS-ktr inf o IS C&rr-e-CT. 

)»^LX
# C_2011252EN.01005302.xml

| 27.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/53

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 27 June 2011 — Scheefer v Parliament

(Case F-75/10) (1)

1

(Staff case - Temporary staff - Renewal of a fixed-term contract - No need to adjudicate)

2011/C 252/115

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Séverine Scheefer (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: C. L’Hote-Tissier, R. Adam and P. Ketter, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: R. Ignătescu and S. Alves, agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the defendant’s decisions refusing to issue a reasoned decision in relation to the applicant’s legal status and in particular refusing to reclassify the applicant’s temporary staff contract as engagement for an indefinite period in accordance with the first paragraph of Article 8 of the CEOS and for compensation for damage suffered by the applicant.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on Case F-75/10 Scheefer v Parliament; |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on Case F-75/10 Scheefer v Parliament;

| 2. | The European Parliament shall bear its own costs and pay those of Ms Scheefer. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Parliament shall bear its own costs and pay those of Ms Scheefer.

---

(1)  OJ 2010 C 301, p. 64

1

---
EXHIBIT 32

              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Aviation General,
Incorporated  and  Subsidiaries.  (the  "Company")  for the fiscal quarter ended
September  30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date  hereof  (the "Report"), the undersigned President and Principal Accounting
and  Financial Officer of the Company each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     1.  The  Report  fully  complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     2.  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  March  25,  2004


                                    /s/  Wirt  D.  Walker  III
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                         Wirt  D.  Walker  III
                                         Director,  Chairman  of  the  Board,
                                           and  Chief  Executive  Officer,
                                           President  and  Treasurer

                                    /s/  Glenn  A.  Jackson
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                         Glenn  A.  Jackson
                                         Chief  Financial  Officer
# C_2011055EN.01002402.xml

| 19.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/24

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 17 December 2010 — Uspaskich v Parliament

(Case T-507/10 P)

(Interim measures - Waiver of the immunity of a member of the European Parliament - Application for suspension of operation)

2011/C 55/44

Language of the case: Lithuanian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Viktor Uspaskich (Kėdainiai, Lithuania) (represented by V Sviderskis, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: N. Lorenz, A. Pospíšilová Padowska and L. Mašalaite, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application to suspend the operation of the resolution of the European Parliament of 7 September 2010 waiving the applicant's immunity.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Costs are reserved.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0001063530
<NAME>                        Surgical Safety Products, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Currency

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         188,000
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  9,981
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    6,119
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               211,600
<PP&E>                                         221,524
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 618,376
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          247,329
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       11,812
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   618,376
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               52,734
<CGS>                                          8,135
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  432,560
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               424,425
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             7,440
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (379,826)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (379,826)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals 

For the First Circuit 

No. 18-1199 

UNITED STATES, EX. REL. 

CONCILIO DE SALUD INTEGRAL DE LOÍZA, INC. ("CSILO"), 

Plaintiffs, Appellants, 

v. 

JC REMODELING, INC. AND JOSE GARCIA-SUAREZ, 

Defendants, Appellants. 

ERRATA SHEET 

 

The opinion of this Court issued on June 15, 2020, is amended 

as follows: 

On Page 5, line 9: "summons" is replaced with "summonses"
#### § 25.16 Penalties.

Whoever shall be found guilty of violating any rule or regulation governing the GAO Building is subject to a fine of not more than $500, or imprisonment for not more than 6 months, or both. Nothing in these rules and regulations shall be construed to abrogate any other Federal laws applicable to the GAO Building.
§ 7.5 Adverse actions: Suspensions for 14 days or less. ( a ) *Policy.* A GAO employee may be suspended for 14 days or less for such cause as will promote the efficiency of GAO (including discourteous conduct to the public confirmed by an immediate supervisor's report of four such instances within any 1-year period or any other pattern of discourteous conduct). Suspension means placing an employee, for disciplinary reasons, temporarily in a status without duties and pay.
( b ) *Employee entitlement.* An employee against whom a suspension for 14 days or less is proposed is entitled to— ( 1 ) An advance written notice stating the specific reasons for the proposed action;
( 2 ) A reasonable time to answer orally and in writing and to furnish affidavits and other documentary evidence in support of the answer;
( 3 ) Be represented by an attorney or other representative; and
( 4 ) A written decision and the specific reasons therefore at the earliest practicable date.
( c ) *Documentation.* Copies of the notice of proposed action, the answer of the employee if written, a summary thereof if made orally, the notice of decision and reasons therefor, and any order effecting the suspension, together with any supporting material, shall be maintained by Personnel and shall be furnished to the employee affected upon the employee's request.
( d ) *Nonapplicability.* This section is not applicable to— ( 1 ) An employee who is serving a trial period under an initial appointment in GAO or who has not completed 1 year of current continuous employment in the same or similar positions in GAO under other than a temporary appointment limited to 1 year or less.
( 2 ) A suspension in the interest of national security.
#### § 590.508 Candling and transfer-room operations.

Eggs must be handled in a manner that minimizes sweating prior to breaking or processing.
### §1681r. Unauthorized disclosures by officers or employees

Any officer or employee of a consumer reporting agency who knowingly and willfully provides information concerning an individual from the agency's files to a person not authorized to receive that information shall be fined under title 18, imprisoned for not more than 2 years, or both.

(Pub. L. 90–321, title VI, §620, as added Pub. L. 91–508, title VI, §601, Oct. 26, 1970, 84 Stat. 1134; amended Pub. L. 104–208, div. A, title II, §2415(b), Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–450.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–208 substituted "fined under title 18, imprisoned for not more than 2 years, or both" for "fined not more than $5,000 or imprisoned not more than one year, or both".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1996 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 104–208 effective 365 days after Sept. 30, 1996, with special rule for early compliance, see section 2420 of Pub. L. 104–208, set out as a note under section 1681a of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective upon the expiration of one hundred and eighty days following Oct. 26, 1970, see section 504(d) of Pub. L. 90–321, as added by Pub. L. 91–508, set out as a note under section 1681 of this title.