alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
January 22, 2019

No. 04

- 18

- 00831

- CV
Michael Thomas PAUL , Appellant

v. Miguel LOPEZ , Dave Padula, John Stricklin, Javier Zuniga, John Doe I, Det. Spil ler, Ron Eberhardt, News4 WOAI, Appellee s From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 18

- 2085

- CV

- A Honorable Jessica Crawford, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R On December 17, 2018, appellant filed a statement of inability to pay court costs in this court. On January 9, 201 9 , we issued an order setting a deadline for filing a contest to the statement. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.1(a),( c); T EX

. R. C IV

. P. 14 5. The court reporter responsible for filing the reporter’s record in this appeal timely filed a contest to appellant’s statement of inability to pay court costs

. See T EX

. R. C IV

. P. 145(f) (3)

. Therefore, we abate this appeal and re mand this case to the trial court

. We ORDER the trial court to hold an “oral evidentiary hearing ” pursuant to Rule 145(f) (5) of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure to determine appellant’s inability to afford court costs

. See id

. R. 145(f)(5). At th e hearing, the burden is on appellant to prove his inability to afford court costs. See id

. If the trial court determines appellant can afford court costs, its order requiring appellant to pay court costs must be supported by detailed findings. See id

. R. 14 5(f)(6). We ORDER the trial court to file its order and any related findings on or before February 25, 201 9

. Finally, w e ORDER (1) the trial court clerk to file , on or before March 7, 201 9 , a limited clerk ’ s record containing the trial court ’ s order determining appellant’s inability to afford court costs and any related findings ; and (2) the court report er to file , on or before March 7, 201 9 , a limited reporter’s record of the contest hearing

. All other appellate dead lines are suspended pending furthe r orders from this court

.

_________________________________ Irene Rios , JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 22nd day of January, 2 019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE , Clerk of Court
#### HERMAN MUNOZ and VIVIAN MUNOZ, Plaintiffs v. GOVERNMENT OF GUAM and I. Q. AGUON, Defendants

Civil No. 806-75

Superior Court of Guam

January 26, 1976

WEEKS, *Judge*

DECISION

The Government’s motion to dismiss is hereby denied. The Court does not find that the fact that the Government was included in the notice and motion for jury trial as party defendants sufficient cause to dismiss this action. Rather the Court construes the motion for jury trial as only applying to those party defendants, other than the Government, who are entitled to have their factual issues resolved *304by jury deliberation. Further, the Court believes that for purpose of more efficient judicial administration that this action with respect to all the parties including the Government proceed with a jury impanelled, however, leaving the issues in controversy relative to the Government to remain within the province of the judge presiding over the trial for determination. The Court finds support for this procedural posturing of this action in the cases of: *United States v. Yellow Cab. Co.,*304 U.S. 543, 555-556 (1951); *Simon v. Lougreen,*368 F.Supp. 265, 270 (D.C.V.I. 1973); *Englehardt v. United States,*69 F.Supp. 451, 455 (D.C. Md. 1947). However the Court notes in passing that if this posturing creates any undue hardship for the Government, they can always seek procedural relief by seeking to avail themselves of *Rule J/£(b) of the Rules of Civil Procedure for the Superior Court of Guam.*
### §4728a. State and Federal Export Promotion Coordination Working Group

#### (a) Statement of policy

It is the policy of the United States to promote exports as an opportunity for small businesses. In exercising their powers and functions in order to advance that policy, all Federal agencies shall work constructively with State and local agencies engaged in export promotion and export financing activities.

#### (b) Establishment

The President shall establish a State and Federal Export Promotion Coordination Working Group (in this section referred to as the "Working Group") as a subcommittee of the Trade Promotion Coordination Committee (in this section referred to as the "TPCC").

#### (c) Purposes

The purposes of the Working Group are—

(1) to identify issues related to the coordination of Federal resources relating to export promotion and export financing with such resources provided by State and local governments;

(2) to identify ways to improve coordination with respect to export promotion and export financing activities through the strategic plan developed under section 4727(c) of this title;

(3) to develop a strategy for improving coordination of Federal and State resources relating to export promotion and export financing, including methods to eliminate duplication of effort and overlapping functions; and

(4) to develop a strategic plan for considering and implementing the suggestions of the Working Group as part of the strategic plan developed under section 4727(c) of this title.

#### (d) Membership

The Secretary of Commerce shall select the members of the Working Group, who shall include—

(1) representatives from State trade agencies representing regionally diverse areas; and

(2) representatives of the departments and agencies that are represented on the TPCC, who are designated by the heads of their respective departments or agencies to advise the head on ways of promoting the exportation of United States goods and services.

(Pub. L. 100–418, title II, §2313A, as added Pub. L. 114–125, title V, §504(a), Feb. 24, 2016, 130 Stat. 177.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Delegation of Functions

Functions of President under subsec. (b) of this section assigned to Secretary of Commerce, see Ex. Ord. No. 13733, §1(a), July 22, 2016, 81 F.R. 49515, set out as a note under section 4421 of Title 19, Customs Duties.
#### § 1317.120 Transfers of property.

If a recipient sells or otherwise transfers property financed in whole or in part with Federal financial assistance to a transferee that operates any education program or activity, and the Federal share of the fair market value of the property is not upon such sale or transfer properly accounted for to the Federal Government, both the transferor and the transferee shall be deemed to be recipients, subject to the provisions of §§ 1317.205 through 1317.235(a).
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Seeks Applications for Rural Energy for America Program

Updated Nov. 22, 2021 to indicate that applications will receive priority points for advancing key priorities 

under the Biden-Harris Administration. The * denotes new or updated information since the original 

announcement.

WASHINGTON, July 26, 2021 – USDA Deputy Under Secretary for Rural Development Justin Maxson today 

announced that the department is accepting applications for loan guarantees and grants for renewable energy 

systems; and to make energy efficiency improvements, conduct energy audits and provide development 

assistance.

Funds are being made available under the Rural Energy for America Program (REAP). USDA is seeking

applications for Fiscal Year 2022 funding. The deadlines to apply for grants are Oct. 31, 2021, and March 31, 

2022. Applications for technical assistance grants are due Jan. 31, 2022. Applications for loan guarantees are 

accepted year-round.

* All applications will be subject to updated scoring provisions regardless of which deadline they meet.

Specifically, applications will receive 10 priority points if they meet any of these key priorities:

• * Assist rural communities to recover economically from the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, 

particularly disadvantaged communities.

• * Ensure all rural residents have equitable access to Rural Development programs and benefits from 

Rural Development funded projects.

• * Support economic investments in distressed communities.

* For more information, visit https://www.rd.usda.gov/priority-points or page 66273 of the Nov. 22, 2021, 

Federal Register.

Agricultural producers and rural small businesses are eligible applicants for loan guarantees and grants to 

develop renewable energy systems and to make energy efficiency improvements. State and local governments, 

federally-recognized tribes, land-grant colleges or universities or other institutions of higher education, rural 

electric cooperatives, public power entities, and Resource Conservation & Development Councils (as defined in 

16 USC §3451) are eligible applicants for grants to conduct energy audits and provide development assistance.

Interested applicants are encouraged to contact their local USDA Rural Development State Energy Coordinator

well in advance of the application deadlines to discuss their project and ask any questions about the REAP

program or the application process. 

Additional information on the required materials and how to apply for the REAP program are available on page 

40000 of the July 26, 2021, Federal Register.

If you’d like to subscribe to USDA Rural Development updates, visit our GovDelivery subscriber page.
###

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender
### §2733. Medal of honor: duplicate medal

An individual awarded a medal of honor shall, upon written application of that individual, be issued, without charge, one duplicate medal of honor with ribbons and appurtenances. Such duplicate medal of honor shall be marked, in such manner as the Secretary may determine, as a duplicate or for display purposes only.

(Added Pub. L. 107–107, div. A, title V, §553(d)(1)(A), Dec. 28, 2001, 115 Stat. 1116, §504; renumbered §2733, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §116(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4226; amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. G, title LVXXXV [LXXXV], §8505(a)(26), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4749.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283 substituted "An individual" for "A person" and "that individual" for "that person".

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 504 of this title as this section.
# C_2012331EN.01001102.xml

| 27.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 6 September 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā rajona tiesa — Latvia) — Laimonis Treimanis v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests

(Case C-487/11) (1)

(Regulation (EEC) No 918/83 - Articles 1(2)(c), 2 and 7(1) - Relief from import duties on personal property - The term ‘property intended ... for meeting ... household needs’ - Motor vehicle imported into the European Union - Vehicle used by a member of the family of the importing owner)

(2012/C 331/17)

Language of the case: Latvian

Referring court

Administratīvā rajona tiesa

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Laimonis Treimanis

Defendant: Valsts ieņēmumu dienests

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Administratīvā rajona tiesa Rīgas — Interpretation of Article 7(1) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 918/83 of 28 March 1983 setting up a Community system of reliefs from customs duty (OJ 1983 L 105, p. 1) — Relief from import duty in respect of personal property — Concept of a household — Car used for the needs of a household in a third country — Car imported by its owner, essentially resident in the third country, into a Member State of the European Union for use free of charge by a member of the owner’s family who has moved his residence to that Member State and who formed part of the same household as the owner before the vehicle was imported

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 2 and 7(1) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 918/83 of 28 March 1983 setting up a Community system of reliefs from customs duty must be interpreted as meaning that a private motor vehicle imported from a third country into the customs territory of the European Union may be imported free of import duties provided that the importer has actually transferred his normal place of residence to the customs territory of the European Union, which is a matter for the national court to determine. A motor vehicle used free of charge by a member of that importer’s family, that is by a person living under the same roof as the importer or mainly dependent on him, a matter for the national court to determine, is to be regarded as being intended for meeting the needs of the importer’s household, and that use does not result in loss of entitlement to the relief in question.

---

(1)  OJ C 347, 26.11.2011.

---
§ 83.13 Inquiries. ( a ) General inquiries to request assistance in identifying which system of records may contain a record about an individual may be made in person or by mail to the Director, Personnel.
( b ) An inquiry that requests GAO to determine if it has, in a given system of personnel records, a record about the inquirer, should be addressed to the official identified in the Federal Register notice for that system. Inquirers should specify the name of the system of personnel records, if known, as published in the Federal Register. Such inquiries should contain the identifying data prescribed in § 83.12 before a search can be made of that particular system of records.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 24.1

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned does
hereby appoint and constitute Marc I. Perkins and Michael M. Vehlies and each of
them as his agent and attorney-in-fact to execute in his name, place and stead
(whether on behalf of the undersigned individually or as an officer or director
of Gunther International, Ltd. or otherwise) to the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
of Gunther International, Ltd. respecting its fiscal year ended March 31, 2000
and any and all further amendments thereto and to file such report and any
further amendments thereto with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Each of
the said attorneys shall have the power to act hereunder with or without the
other.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this instrument this
27 day of June, 2000.


/s/ Steven S. Kirkpatrick
-----------------------------------------
Steven S. Kirkpatrick


/s/ J. Kenneth Hickman
-----------------------------------------
J. Kenneth Hickman


/s/ Gerald H. Newman
-----------------------------------------
Gerald H. Newman


/s/ Marc I. Perkins
-----------------------------------------
Marc I. Perkins


/s/ George A. Snelling
-----------------------------------------
George A. Snelling


/s/ Robert Spiegel
-----------------------------------------
Robert Spiegel


/s/ Thomas M. Steinberg
-----------------------------------------
Thomas M. Steinberg
#### § 557.17 Returned U.S. inspected and marked fish and fish products.

U.S. inspected and passed and so marked fish products exported to and returned from foreign countries will be admitted into the United States without compliance with this part upon notification of and approval by the Assistant Administrator, Office of Field Operations, Food Safety and Inspection Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC 20250, in specific cases.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

RODNEY HITCHENS

,

Defendant Below,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Plaintiff Below,

Appellee. §

§

§ No. 95 , 2019

§

§ Court Below

— Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§

§ Cr. ID No. 8 6 S10105DI ( S )

§

§

§

Submitted: April 25, 2019

Decided: May 16 , 2019

Before STRINE

, Chief Justice ; SEITZ and TRAYNOR

, Justices.

ORDER

A fter careful consideration of the appellant’s opening brief, the appellee’s

motion to affirm, and the record on appeal

, we conclude that the judgment below

should be affirmed on th e basis of the Superior Court order, dated February 8, 2019

,

summarily dismissing the ap pellant’s sixth motion for postconviction relief

. 1 The

Superior Court did not err in determining that t he motion was procedurally barred

and did not satisfy the pleading requirements of Superior Court Criminal Rule

61(d)(2).

1 State v. Hitchens , 2019 WL 494676 (Del. Super. Ct. Feb. 8, 2019)

.2

NOW, T HEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that motion to affirm is GRANTED

and the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gary F. Traynor

Justice
#   2021-2022 NSDUH: State-Specific Tables

Browse population estimates based on the 2021-2022 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) for each state and region. There are four tables for each geographic area, which present population estimates and percentages for 35 measures of substance use and mental health by age group across 37 tables. These estimates are based on small area estimation (SAE) methods in which state-level NSDUH data are combined with other data from smaller geographies. The combined data are used to create modeled state estimates of the civilian, noninstitutionalized population ages 12 and older, or adults 18 and older for mental health measures.

The tables are available in a zip file of PDFs or as an HTML file. There is also a table of contents which contains links to specific state files in HTML or PDF.

Tables labeled with an A include measures of substance use and mental health issues. Tables labeled with a B include measures of past year substance use and mental health treatment.

National Survey on Drug Use and Health

### Part of Collection:

2021-2022 NSDUH State Estimates of Substance Use and Mental Disorders

                        -  View/Download Files 
                        -  Other Related Reports 
                        -  Report Resources 

### View/Download Files

                                    - All 2021-2021 State Specific Tables(zip | 12.78 MB)
                                    - All 2021-2022 State Specific Tables(htm | 2.49 MB)
                                    - Table of Contents(htm | 14.96 KB)

### Other Related Reports

2021-2022 NSDUH National Maps of Prevalence Estimates, by State

Collected Date: 2021-2022 | Published Date: February 15, 2024 | Type: National Survey on Drug Use and Health

2021-2022 NSDUH: Guide to State Tables and Summary of Small Area Estimation Methodology

Collected Date: 2021-2022 | Published Date: February 15, 2024 | Type: National Survey on Drug Use and Health

2021-2022 NSDUH: Model-Based Estimated Prevalence for States

Collected Date: 2021-2022 | Published Date: February 15, 2024 | Type: National Survey on Drug Use and Health

2021-2022 NSDUH: Model-Based Estimated Totals for States (in Thousands):

Collected Date: 2021-2022 | Published Date: February 15, 2024 | Type: National Survey on Drug Use and Health

2021-2022 NSDUH: Other Sources of State-Level Data

Collected Date: 2021-2022 | Published Date: February 15, 2024 | Type: National Survey on Drug Use and Health

Comparison Between 2021-2022 NSDUH State Prevalence Estimates

Collected Date: 2021-2022 | Published Date: February 15, 2024 | Type: National Survey on Drug Use and Health

### Report Resources

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Data Archive (SAMHDA)'s page about NSDUH.

 < Back to Main content
§ 96.6 Certified foreign animal casings arriving at seaboard or border port. ( a ) Properly certified foreign animal casings arriving in the United States at a seaboard or border port where an APHIS inspector is stationed shall be released for entry by the inspector at the seaboard or border port.
( b ) Properly certified foreign animal casings arriving in the United States at a seaboard or border port where no APHIS inspector is stationed, which are destined to a point in the United States where an APHIS inspector is stationed, shall be shipped in United States Customs custody to destination for release.
( c ) Properly certified foreign animal casing arriving in the United States at a seaboard or border port where no APHIS inspector is stationed, which are destined to a point in the United States where no APHIS inspector is stationed, shall be transported in United States Customs custody to the nearest point where an APHIS inspector is stationed for release at that point.
( d ) Properly certified foreign animal casings forming a part of a foreign meat consignment routed through a border port to an interior point in the United States shall be transported to destination as though the entire consignment consisted of meat. In such cases the APHIS inspector who inspects the meat at destination shall supervise the release of the casings.
[28 FR 5986, June 13, 1963, as amended at 57 FR 29785, July 7, 1992. Redesignated at 58 FR 47031, Sept. 7, 1993]
# C_2013114EN.01000801.xml

| 20.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 114/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 114/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 26 February 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Air France v Heinz-Gerke Folkerts, Luz-Tereza Folkerts

(Case C-11/11) (1)

1

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Air transport - Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 - Articles 6 and 7 - Connecting flight(s) - Delay in arrival at the final destination - Delay equal to or in excess of three hours - A passenger’s right to compensation)

2013/C 114/09

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Air France

Applicant:

Defendants: Heinz-Gerke Folkerts, Luz-Tereza Folkerts

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Bundesgerichtshof — Interpretation of Articles 6 and 7 of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1) — Intercontinental flight consisting of several stages — Situation in which the flight arrives at the final destination ten hours late, although departure was delayed for a period within the limits set out in Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Possible right to compensation

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 must be interpreted as meaning that compensation is payable, on the basis of that article, to a passenger on directly connecting flights who has been delayed at departure for a period below the limits specified in Article 6 of that regulation, but has arrived at the final destination at least three hours later than the scheduled arrival time, given that the compensation in question is not conditional upon there having been a delay at departure and, thus, upon the conditions set out in Article 6 having been met.

---

(1)  OJ C 95, 26.3.2011.

1

---