alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with 35 U.S.C. 209(e), and 37 CFR 404.7 (a)(1)(i) and 37 CFR 404.7 (b)(1)(i), announcement is made of the intent to grant an exclusive, revocable license for the invention claimed in the patent application PCT/US2009/060850, filed October 15, 2009, entitled, “Clinical Decision Model,” to DecisionQ Corporation, with its principal place of business at 1010 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 310, Washington, DC 20007-3680.

# ADDRESSES:

                        Commander, U.S. Army Medical Research and Materiel Command,                         *Attn:*                         Command Judge Advocate, MCMR-JA, 504 Scott Street, Fort Detrick, Frederick, MD 21702-5012.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For licensing issues, Dr. Paul Mele, Office of Research and Technology Applications (ORTA), (301) 619-6664. For patent issues, Ms. Elizabeth Arwine, Patent Attorney, (301) 619-7808, both at telefax (301) 619-5034.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Anyone wishing to object to the grant of this license can file written objections along with supporting evidence, if any, within 15 days from the date of this publication. Written objections are to be filed with the Command Judge Advocate (                    *see***ADDRESSES**                    ).                

Brenda S. Bowen,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2011-5461 Filed 3-9-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-P
EXHIBIT  32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION  906  OF  THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002
(18  U.S.C.  SECTION  1350)

Pursuant  to  section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b)  of  section  1350,  chapter  63  of  title  18,  United  States  Code), the
undersigned  officer  of  FTS Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"),
does  hereby  certify,  to  such  officer's  knowledge,  that:

The  Quarterly Report, as amended, for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the
"Form  10-QSB/A") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a)  or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the information
contained  in  the  Form  10-QSB  fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of  the  Company.

/s/  Scott  Gallagher
-------------------
Scott  Gallagher
Chief  Executive  Officer  and
Interim  Chief  Financial  Officer
December  18,  2006
# C_2010246EN.01003701.xml

| 11.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/37

---

Action brought on 8 July 2010 — DBV v Commission

(Case T-297/10)

()

2010/C 246/63

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: DBV Deutscher Brennstoffvertrieb Würzburg GmbH (Würzburg, Germany) (represented by: C. Rudolph and A. Günther, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | declare void Commission Regulation (EU) No 404/2010 of 10 May 2010 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of certain aluminium wheels originating in the People’s Republic of China; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare void Commission Regulation (EU) No 404/2010 of 10 May 2010 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of certain aluminium wheels originating in the People’s Republic of China;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant is challenging Regulation (EU) No 404/2010, (1) by which the Commission imposed a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of certain aluminium wheels originating in the People’s Republic of China.

1

As a basis for its action, the applicant first submits that there has been a breach of essential procedural requirements and of the rights of the defence in that, in the course of the procedure prior to adoption of the contested regulation, the applicant was not informed or given a hearing, with the result that it had no opportunity to defend its interests and set out its views.

Second, the applicant contends that there was a defective determination of the facts and an abuse of discretionary power. It submits in this regard that the background to the case was misrepresented and incorrectly investigated. The applicant argues that no account was taken of, for instance, the higher exchange rate of the dollar in the interim or of the increased prices of crude oil. The applicant further submits, in connection with its allegation of abuse of discretionary power, that the Commission failed to have regard for the principle of proportionality. An abuse of discretionary power and breach of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (2) also lie, in the applicant’s view, inter alia in the fact that no suitable information was collected in the course of the investigations to establish differentiated duties.

2

---

(1)  Commission Regulation (EU) No 404/2010 of 10 May 2010 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of certain aluminium wheels originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ 2010 L 117, p. 64).

1

(2)  Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (OJ 2009 L 343, p. 51).

2

---
# C_2013129EN.01001601.xml

| 4.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/16

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 March 2013 — Nexans France v Joint Undertaking Fusion for Energy

(Case T-415/10) (1)

1

(Public supply contracts - Euratom - Public procurement procedure of the Joint Undertaking Fusion for Energy - Supply of electrical equipment - Rejection of a tenderer’s bid - Open procedure - Bid containing reservations - Legal certainty - Legitimate expectation - Proportionality - Conflict of interests - Awarding decision - Action for annulment - Not directly concerned - Inadmissibility - Non-contractual liability)

2013/C 129/30

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Nexans France (Paris, France) (represented by: J.-P. Tran Thiet, J.-F. Le Corre and M. Pigeat, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: A. Verpont, acting as Agent, and C. Kennedy-Loest, T. Christopher, Solicitors, J. Derenne, N. Pourbaix, lawyers, and M. Farley, Solicitor)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Firstly, annulment of the decision rejecting the bid submitted by the applicant and the decision to award the contract to another tenderer and, secondly, a claim for compensation.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Nexans France to pay the costs, including those of the interim proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Nexans France to pay the costs, including those of the interim proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 301, 6.11.2010.

1

---
#### DEVARY, Movant, v. WINCHESTER BAKERY, Opposed.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

May 9, 1939.

Marcus C. Redwine for movant.

Jouett & Metcalf, opposed.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal denied; judgment affirmed.
# C_2006186EN.01000901.xml

| 9.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 186/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 186/9

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4243 — International Automotive Components Group/Lear Corporation)

(2006/C 186/08)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 13 July 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4243. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32006M4243. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---
Exhibit 23.1


                    Consent of Independent Public Accountants
                    -----------------------------------------


        As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the
   incorporation by reference of our reports dated May 6, 1997, included in or
   incorporated by reference into Thermo Remediation Inc.'s Annual Report on
   Form 10-K for the year ended March 29, 1997, and into the Company's
   previously filed Registration Statements as follows: Registration Statement
   No. 33-92030 on Form S-3, Registration Statement No. 33-92058 on Form S-8,
   Registration Statement No. 33-85368 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No.
   33-85370 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 33-85374 on Form S-8,
   Registration Statement No. 33-85372 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No.
   333-00062 on Form S-3, Registration Statement No. 33-80747 on Form S-8,
   Registration Statement No. 33-80515 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No.
   33-81226 on Form S-3, Registration Statement No. 33-80458 on Form S-3, and
   Registration Statement No. 33-77818 on Form S-3.




                                           Arthur Andersen LLP



   Boston, Massachusetts
   June 6, 1997
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Proteo, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Birge Bargmann, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to her knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: November 11, 2010





/s/ Birge Bargmann


Birge Bargmann


CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER








A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHER DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE ELECTRONIC VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO PROTEO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY PROTEO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
§ 25.13 Vehicular and pedestrian traffic. ( a ) Drivers of all vehicles entering, leaving or while on GAO property or in the GAO Building shall drive in a careful and safe manner at all times and shall comply with all posted traffic signs and with the signals and directions of the guards, security staff, or other authorized individuals;
( b ) The blocking of entrances, driveways, walks, loading platforms or fire hydrants on GAO property is prohibited; and
( c ) Except in emergencies, parking on GAO property or in the GAO Building is not allowed without a permit. Parking in unauthorized locations or in locations reserved for other persons, or parking contrary to the direction of posted signs or instructions of guards is prohibited. Vehicles parked in violation of posted restrictions or warning signs shall be subject to removal at the owners' risk and expense.
( d ) The Comptroller General or his designee may supplement this paragraph from time to time by issuing and posting such specific traffic directives as may be required. When issued and posted, such directives shall have the same force and effect as if made a part hereof. Proof that a motor vehicle was parked in violation of these regulations or directives may be taken as prima facie evidence that the registered owner was responsible for the violation.
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1328

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit the disclosure

of certain tax information by the Secretary of the Treasury to facilitate

combined Federal and State employment tax reporting, and for other

purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 1, 1999

Mr. KERRY (for himself, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. BAUCUS, Mr. HARKIN, Mr.

CLELAND, and Mr. BURNS) introduced the following bill; which was read

twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit

the disclosure of certain tax information by the Secretary

of the Treasury to facilitate combined Federal and State

employment tax reporting, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Single Point Tax Fil5 ing Act of 1999’’.
2

•S 1328 IS

1 SEC. 2. DISCLOSURE OF TAX INFORMATION TO FACILITATE

2 COMBINED EMPLOYMENT TAX REPORTING.

3 Section 6103(d)(5) of the Internal Revenue Code of

4 1986 is amended to read as follows:

5 ‘‘(5) DISCLOSURE FOR COMBINED EMPLOY6 MENT TAX REPORTING.—The Secretary may disclose

7 taxpayer identity information and signatures to any

8 agency, body, or commission of any State for the

9 purpose of carrying out with such agency, body, or

10 commission a combined Federal and State employ11 ment tax reporting program approved by the Sec12 retary. Subsections (a)(2) and (p)(4) and sections

13 7213 and 7213A shall not apply with respect to dis14 closures or inspections made pursuant to this para15 graph.’’

Æ
# C_2013114EN.01001102.xml

| 20.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 114/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 114/11

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 21 February 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie van België — Belgium) — ProRail NV v Xpedys NV, DB Schenker Rail Nederland NV, Nationale Maatschappij der Belgische Spoorwegen NV, FAG Kugelfischer GmbH,

(Case C-332/11) (1)

1

(Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001 - Cooperation in the taking of evidence in civil and commercial matters - Direct taking of evidence - Designation of an expert - Task carried out partly in the Member State of the referring court and partly in another Member State)

2013/C 114/15

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hof van Cassatie van België

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: ProRail NV

Applicant:

Defendants: Xpedys NV, DB Schenker Rail Nederland NV, Nationale Maatschappij der Belgische Spoorwegen NV, FAG Kugelfischer GmbH

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Hof van Cassatie van België — Interpretation of Articles 1 and 17 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001 of 28 May 2001 on cooperation between the courts of the Member States in the taking of evidence in civil or commercial matters (OJ 2001 L 174, p. 1) and of Article 33(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (‘Brussels I’) (OJ 2001, L 12, p. 1) — Direct taking of evidence by the requesting court — Designation of an expert and the assignment to that expert, by the courts of a Member State, of a task which must be carried out partly in the Member State of the courts in question and partly in another Member State — Whether or not the application of the mechanism provided for in Article 17 of Regulation No 1206/2001 is obligatory

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 1(1)(b) and 17 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001 of 28 May 2001 on cooperation between the courts of the Member States in the taking of evidence in civil or commercial matters must be interpreted as meaning that the court of one Member State, which wishes the task of taking of evidence entrusted to an expert to be carried out in another Member State, is not necessarily required to use the method of taking evidence laid down by those provisions to be able to order the taking of that evidence.

---

(1)  OJ C 269, 10.9.2011.

1

---
### §4002. Definitions

(a) For purposes of this subchapter—

(1) the term "export trade" means trade or commerce in goods or services produced in the United States which are exported, or in the course of being exported, from the United States to any other country;

(2) the term "services" includes, but is not limited to, accounting, amusement, architectural, automatic data processing, business, communications, construction franchising and licensing, consulting, engineering, financial, insurance, legal, management, repair, tourism, training, and transportation services;

(3) the term "export trade services" includes, but is not limited to, consulting, international market research, advertising, marketing, insurance, product research and design, legal assistance, transportation, including trade documentation and freight forwarding, communication and processing of foreign orders to and for exporters and foreign purchasers, warehousing, foreign exchange, financing, and taking title to goods, when provided in order to facilitate the export of goods or services produced in the United States;

(4) the term "export trading company" means a person, partnership, association, or similar organization, whether operated for profit or as a nonprofit organization, which does business under the laws of the United States or any State and which is organized and operated principally for purposes of—

(A) exporting goods or services produced in the United States; or

(B) facilitating the exportation of goods or services produced in the United States by unaffiliated persons by providing one or more export trade services;

(5) the term "State" means any of the several States of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, American Samoa, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands;

(6) the term "United States" means the several States of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, American Samoa, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands; and

(7) the term "antitrust laws" means the antitrust laws as defined in section 12(a) of this title, section 45 of this title to the extent that section 45 of this title applies to unfair methods of competition, and any State antitrust or unfair competition law.

(b) The Secretary of Commerce may by regulation further define any term defined in subsection (a), in order to carry out this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 97–290, title I, §103, Oct. 8, 1982, 96 Stat. 1234.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Termination of Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands

For termination of Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, see note set out preceding section 1681 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.
BEFORE SHE MAKES PLANS 

WITH FRIENDS ...

Establish some family rules for social and extracurricular 

activities.

Kids don’t always have all the facts when it comes to alcohol and other drugs. 

Talk with your child about the risks of underage drinking and substance use, 

and be clear and consistent about your expectations. For tips on how—and 

when—to begin the conversation, visit 

www.underagedrinking.samhsa.gov

#TalkTheyHearYou PEP20-03-01-049
# C_2011362EN.01002102.xml

| 10.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 362/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 362/21

---

Order of the General Court of 18 October 2011 — Confortel Gestión v OHIM — Homargrup (CONFORTEL AQUA 4)

(Case T-521/10) (1)

1

2011/C 362/33

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 30, 29.1.2011.

1

---
(1 of 4)

20-HIP-WI-A

(Released 6-2020) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

FEDERAL CROP INSURANCE CORPORATION

HURRICANE INSURANCE PROTECTION WIND -

INDEX ENDORSEMENT

2020 HIP-WI END OF INSURANCE EXTENSION 

COVERAGE OPTION

(1) In return for your payment of the additional premium designated in the actuarial documents for the coverage, this Option will be 

attached to and made part of the Common Crop Insurance Policy, Basic Provisions (Basic Provisions), the Crop Provisions for 

the insured crop, and the Hurricane Insurance Protection Wind-Index Endorsement subject to the terms and conditions described 

herein. 

(2) This Option is available only in counties for crops for which coverage is offered in the actuarial documents.

(3) You must have the Basic Provisions, the Crop Provisions for the insured crop, and the Hurricane Insurance Protection WindIndex Endorsement in force to elect this Option.

(4) You must elect this Option in writing on or before August 31, 2020, if you wish to extend the HIP-WI end of insurance period until 

November 20. This Option is only in effect for the 2020 crop year.

(5) Except when in conflict with this Option, all provisions of the Basic Provisions, the Crop Provisions for the insured crop, and the 

Hurricane Insurance Protection Wind-Index Endorsement apply.