alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 93.402 Inspection of certain aircraft and other means of conveyance and shipping containers thereon; unloading, cleaning, and disinfection requirements. ( a ) *Inspection:* All aircraft and other means of conveyance (including shipping containers thereon) moving into the United States from any foreign region are subject to inspection without a warrant by properly identified and designated inspectors to determine whether they are carrying any animal, carcass, product or article regulated or subject to disposal under any law or regulation administered by the Secretary of Agriculture for prevention of the introduction or dissemination of any communicable animal disease.
( b ) *Unloading requirements:* Whenever in the course of any such inspection at any port in the United States the inspector has reason to believe that the means of conveyance or container is contaminated with material of animal (including poultry) origin, such as, but not limited to, meat, organs, glands, extracts, secretions, fat, bones, blood, lymph, urine, or manure, so as to present a danger of the spread of any communicable animal disease, the inspector may require the unloading of the means of conveyance and the emptying of the container if he or she deems it necessary to enable him or her to determine whether the means of conveyance or container is in fact so contaminated. The principal operator of the means of conveyance and his or her agent in charge of the means of conveyance shall comply with any such requirement under the immediate supervision of, and in the time and manner prescribed by, the inspector.
( c ) *Cleaning and disinfection:* Whenever, upon inspection under this section, an inspector determines that a means of conveyance or shipping container is contaminated with material of animal origin so as to present a danger of the spread of any communicable animal disease, he or she shall notify the principal operator of the means of conveyance or his or her agent in charge, of such determination and the requirements under this section. The person so notified shall cause the cleaning and disinfection of such means of conveyance and container under the immediate supervision of, and in the time and manner prescribed by, the inspector.
( d ) For purposes of this section, the term “shipping container” means any container of a type specially adapted for use in transporting any article on the means of conveyance involved.
[55 FR 31495, Aug. 2, 1990. Redesignated and amended at 62 FR 56012, 56017, Oct. 28, 1997; 68 FR 6344, Feb. 7, 2003]
# CIVI LAVIATIO NAUTHORIT r Mailin g Address : P.O . Bo x2163 , Nationa lMai lCentr e Golde nGrov eRoad , Piarc o Republi c o f

Trinida d& Tobag o e-mail : ttcaa@tstt.net.t t website : www.caa.gov.t t Admin , CATC : Insp . Radar : AIS : 7&E : Tel/Fax : (868 ) 669-4302 ;

Tel : (868 ) 642-333 0 Te l (868 ) 669-4251 /

051 9 Te} : (868 ) 669-063 5 Tel : (868 ) 669^12 8 Tel : (868 ) 669-470 6 Fax : (868 ) 642-613 0 Fax : (868 ) 669-543 8 Fax : f868 > 669-480 6 Fax:(868)669-171 6 Fax : (868 ) 669-523 9 Ref. CAA/ii/f/io/DGCA Octobe rii , 201 0 '-i^ j Mr . Pau l Gretc h 2! ^ 0~^ ^ Director , Offic e o fInternationa l Aviatio n rnro ^ Offic e o fth e Assistan tSecretar yT ) §^ ^ Fo rAviatio n an d Internationa l Affair s -n - O^ ^ U.S . Departmen to fTransportatio n t n cn'~ ~ jc r 120 0 Ne wJerseyAvenue , S.W . WASHINGTON . D.C . 20I;Q O Dea rMr . Gretch , Th e Trinida d an d Tobag o Civi l Aviatio n Authorit yhereb yconfirm s tha treciproca l treatmen twil l b e give n t o U. S designate d airline s t o operat e sevent h freedo m charte r flight s t o th e Unite d State s (o n th e POS/JFK/PO S route ) fro m a thir d country . Yours sincerely , TRINIDA D AN D TOBAG O CIVI LAVIATIO N AUTHORIT Y /\a,ui^f \

'%ju^^^:\iA^ ^ Rames h Lutchmedia l Directo rGenera l o fCivi l Aviatio n
§ 98.12 General prohibitions. ( a ) Ruminant and swine embryos may not be imported from regions where foot-and-mouth disease exists except in accordance with this subpart.
( b ) Ruminant and swine embryos may not be imported into the United States from any region other than the region in which they were conceived and collected.
[56 FR 55809, Oct. 30, 1991, as amended at 61 FR 15183, Apr. 5, 1996; 62 FR 56025, Oct. 28, 1997; 83 FR 15494, Apr. 11, 2018]
cc: Hon. Timothy C. Williams, District Judge 

Don McAllister 

Blaine D. Beckstead 

Law Offices of Bruce I. Flammey 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COUFtT 

OF 2 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A ern
§ 9036.3 Submission errors and insufficient records. Contributions which are otherwise matchable may be rejected for matching purposes because of submission errors or insufficient supporting documentation. Contributions, other than those defined in 11 CFR 9034.3 or in the form of money orders, cashier's checks, or similar negotiable instruments, may become matchable if there is a proper resubmission in accordance with 11 CFR 9036.5 and 9036.6. Insufficient documentation or submission errors include but are not limited to: ( a ) Discrepancies in the written instrument, such as: ( 1 ) Instruments drawn on other than personal accounts of contributors and not signed by the contributing individual;
( 2 ) Signature discrepancies; and
( 3 ) Lack of the contributor's signature, the amount or date of the contribution, or the listing of the committee or candidate as payee.
( b ) Discrepancies between listed contributions and the written instrument or supporting records, such as: ( 1 ) The listed amount requested for matching exceeds the amount contained on the written instrument;
( 2 ) A written instrument has not been submitted to support a listed contribution;
( 3 ) The submitted written instrument cannot be associated either by accountholder identification or signature with the listed contributor; or
( 4 ) A discrepancy between the listed contribution and the supporting bank records or the bank records is omitted.
( c ) Discrepancies within or between contributor lists submitted, such as: ( 1 ) The address of the contributor is omitted or incomplete or the contributor's name is alphabetized incorrectly, or more than one contributor is listed per item;
( 2 ) A discrepancy in aggregation within or between submissions which results in a request that more than $250 be matched for that contributor, or a listing of a contributor more than once within the same submission; or
( 3 ) A written instrument has been previously submitted and matched in full or is listed twice in the same submission.
( d ) The omission of information, supporting statements, or records required by 11 CFR 9034.2.
[56 FR 34132, July 25, 1991, as amended at 89 FR 221, Jan. 2, 2024]
#### MOSLEY & MOSLEY BUILDERS v. LANDIN LTD.

No. 165P90

Case below: 97 N.C.App. 511

Petition by defendants for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 13 June 1990.
# C_2012126EN.01001501.xml

| 28.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 126/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 126/15

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 March 2012 — Cortés del Valle López v OHIM (¡Que buenu ye! HIJOPUTA)

(Case T-417/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for Community figurative mark ¡Que buenu ye! HIJOPUTA - Absolute ground for refusal - Trade mark contrary to public policy or to accepted principles of morality - Article 7(1)(f) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2012/C 126/29

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Federico Cortés del Valle López (Maliaño, Spain) (represented by: J. Calderón Chavero and T. Villate Consonni, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 June 2010 (Case R 175/2010-2) concerning an application for registration as a Community trade mark of the figurative sign ¡Que buenu ye! HIJOPUTA.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Federico Cortés del Valle López to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Federico Cortés del Valle López to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 301, 6.11.2010.

1

---
### §2961. Study and decision aid

#### (a) Study of consequences of community growth and development; decision aid to assist State and local authorities in managing development

The Secretary of Commerce shall conduct a study of the implications and potential consequences of growth and development on urban, suburban, and rural communities. Based upon the findings of the study, the Secretary shall produce a decision aid to assist State and local authorities in planning and managing urban, suburban, and rural growth and development while preserving community character.

#### (b) Consultation with appropriate Federal departments and agencies

The Secretary of Commerce shall consult with other appropriate Federal departments and agencies as necessary in carrying out this section.

#### (c) Report

The Secretary of Commerce shall submit to the Congress a report containing the decision aid produced under subsection (a) no later than January 30, 1992. The Secretary shall notify appropriate State and local authorities that such decision aid is available on request.

(Pub. L. 101–606, title III, §301, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3104.)
#### § 557.7 Products for importation; movement prior to inspection; handling; bond; assistance.

The requirements in 9 CFR 327.7 respecting the movement or conveyance from any port, or delivery to the consignee, of any product required to be inspected under part 327, apply to fish and fish products.
§ 56.9 Claims not allowed. ( a ) The Department will not allow claims arising out of the destruction of poultry unless the poultry have been appraised as prescribed in this part and the owners have signed the appraisal form indicating agreement with the appraisal amount as required by § 56.4(a).
( b ) The Department will not allow claims arising out of the destruction of poultry unless the owners have signed a written agreement with APHIS in which they agree that if they maintain poultry in the future on the premises used for poultry for which indemnity and/or compensation is paid, they will maintain the poultry in accordance with a plan set forth by the Cooperating State Agency and will not introduce poultry onto the premises until after the date specified by the Cooperating State Agency. Persons who do not maintain their poultry and premises in accordance with this written agreement will not be eligible to receive indemnity and/or compensation under this part.
( c ) The Department will not allow claims arising out of the destruction of poultry unless the poultry have been moved or handled by the owner in accordance with an agreement for the control and eradication of H5/H7 LPAI and in accordance with part 56, for any progeny of any poultry unless the poultry have been moved or handled by the owner in accordance with an agreement for the control and eradication of H5/H7 LPAI and in accordance with part 56, or for any poultry that become or have become infected with or exposed to H5/H7 LPAI because of actions not in accordance with an agreement for the control and eradication of H5/H7 LPAI or a violation of this part.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0007) [71 FR 56323, Sept. 26, 2006, as amended at 75 FR 10657, Mar. 9, 2010; 85 FR 62564, Oct. 5, 2020]
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential

. 

# United States Court of Appeals
**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

SHARKNINJA OPERATING LLC, SHARKNINJA MANAGEMENT LLC, SHARKNINJA MANAGEMENT CO., SHAR KNINJA SALES COMPANY, EP MIDCO LL C, Appellants

v.

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee

______________________

2023

- 2162

______________________

Appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigat ion No. 337

- TA

- 1252.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

Before D YK

, W ALLACH , and C HEN

, Circuit Judges

.

P ER C URIAM

.
O R D E R

T he parties joint ly mo ve to stay this appeal until July 24, 2024, when the only patent at issue will expire

, and then dismiss this appeal as moot, vacate the Case: 23-2162 Document: 22 Page: 1 Filed: 03/22/2024SHARKNINJA OPERATING LLC v. ITC 2

International Trade Commission ( ITC ) ’s final determination

, and remand with instructions to dismiss this portion of the complaint as moot

. The complainant and patentee, iRobot Corporation, has not sought le ave to intervene in this appeal.

Upon consideration thereof,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT :

(1) The motion is granted to the extent that this appeal is stayed until July 24, 2024.

(2) On July 25, 2024, the Clerk of Court is directed to

issue an order , which will constitute the mandate, dismissing this appeal and remanding the case back to the ITC to

enable it to vacat e its final determination and dismiss therelevant portion of the complaint consistent with the parties’ motion

.

March 2 2 , 2024

Date F OR THE C OURT Case: 23-2162 Document: 22 Page: 2 Filed: 03/22/2024
##               Policy Menu          

## Policy

            -  Advocacy and Research 
            -  Advisory Opinions 
            -  Cooperation Agreements 
            -  Federal Register Notices 
            -  Reports                -  Annual Competition Reports 
              -  Commission and Staff Reports 
              -  Economic Issue Papers 
              -  Economic Reports 
              -  FOIA Annual Reports 
              -  FOIA Quarterly Reports 
              -  FTC Annual Reports 
              -  Litigation Status Reports 
              -  Magnuson-Moss Warranty Public Audit Filings 
              -  Rotational Health Warnings 
              -  US Submissions to OECD (2010-present) and Other International Competition Fora 
              -  Webb-Pomerene Act Filings 
            -  Public Comments 
            -  Studies 
            -  Testimony 
            -  Policy Statements 
            -  International 
            -  Office of Technology Blog 

The FTC produces a number of reports that examine antitrust and consumer protection trends. The agency uses this research to inform policy and to evaluate the agency’s performance. FTC policy reports include:
                        - staff and commission reports about specific topics of interest
                        - economic analyses  and  reports
                        - competition reports
                        - financial reports
                        - annual reports  and other reports about the agency’s activities

As part of its engagement with the international community, the FTC also submits reports to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and other international forums.

In addition, the FTC publishes these periodic reports:
                        - Magnuson-Moss Warranty Public Audit Filings
                        - Rotational Health Warnings for Cigarette Labeling
                        - Webb-Pomerene Act Filings

**Return to top
AFS-12-004-E 

November 21, 2011 

 Exemption No. 7772E 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2002-11395 

Mr. James F. Kregiel 

SkillsUSA VICA 

14001 SkillsUSA Way 

Leesburg, VA 20177 

Dear Mr. Kregiel: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 7772, 

as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letters dated October 5, and October 21, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) on behalf of SkillsUSA VICA (Vocational International Clubs of 

America) (SkillsUSA) for an extension of Exemption No. 7772, as amended. That exemption 

from § 147.21 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations relates to aviation maintenance 

technician schools whose students participate in the SkillsUSA Championships. The 

exemption allows authorized faculty members of those schools to determine if the student 

time dedicated to preparing for and participating in the SkillsUSA Championships (up to 60 

hours per student per year) satisfies the requirements of § 147.21. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to SkillsUSA. 
 2

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 7772, as 

amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. 

Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA 

Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition. 

The Effect of Our Decision 

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 7772, as amended, to May 31, 

2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

 

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 7772, as amended, remain the same. This 

letter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 7772. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

John M. Allen 

Director, Flight Standards Service
### §2062. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–35, title XII, §1211(b), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 721

Section, Pub. L. 92–573, §13, Oct. 27, 1972, 86 Stat. 1219, provided that Commission could prescribe procedures to insure that manufacturer of a new consumer product notify Commission of new product prior to its distribution.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Aug. 13, 1981, see section 1215 of Pub. L. 97–35, set out as an Effective Date of 1981 Amendment note under section 2052 of this title.
Pregunte si tiene dudas o preocupaciones. 

Haga preguntas y asegúrese de que entiende las respuestas. Elija a un médico de

confianza. Lleve a un familiar o a un amigo que pueda ayudarle a hacer preguntas y

entender las respuestas. 

Asegúrese de mantener y llevar al médico una lista de

TODAS las medicinas que toma. 

Hable con su médico y farmacéutico sobre la importancia de mantener una lista de todas

las medicinas que usted toma, incluyendo las medicinas que están disponibles sin receta

médica. Infórmeles sobre cualquier tipo de alergia que tenga a medicamentos. Pregunte

por efectos secundarios y cómo puede evitarlos mientras toma la medicina. Lea siempre la

etiqueta y las advertencias de sus medicamentos. Asegúrese de que le han dado la medicina

que le ha recetado el médico y que sepa cómo usarla. Pregúntele al farmacéutico si la

medicina se ve diferente a lo que usted esperaba. 

Obtenga los resultados de cualquier examen o análisis médico. 

Pregunte cuándo y de qué manera recibirá los resultados de los exámenes realizados.

No presuma que toda está bien si no los recibe cuando usted lo esperaba, ya sea en

persona, por el teléfono, o por correo. Llame a su doctor y pídale sus resultados.

Pregunte lo que significan los resultados con respecto a su condición médica.

Hable con su doctor sobre cuál hospital es mejor para sus

necesidades de salud.

Si puede escoger entre más de un hospital, pregúntele a su doctor cuál hospital ofrece la

mejor atención médica y los mejores resultados para su condición. Asegúrese de entender

las instrucciones para obtener el mejor cuidado de seguimiento cuando salga del hospital.

Asegúrese de entender lo qué sucederá si necesita tener

cirugía. 

Asegúrese de que su médico, su cirujano y usted estén de acuerdo con lo que se hará

durante la cirugía. Pregúntele a su médico “¿Quién será responsable por mi cuidado

mientras esté en el hospital?” Pregúntele a su cirujano: 

• ¿Exactamente lo qué le van hacer? 

• ¿Cuánto tiempo durará? 

• ¿Qué sucederá después de la cirugía? 

• ¿Cómo se sentirá durante el período de recuperación? 

• Informe al cirujano, anestesiólogos y a las enfermeras si tiene alergias o si

alguna vez ha tenido una reacción adversa a la anestesia.

1

2

3

4

5

Cinco Recomendaciones para

Recibir una Mejor Atención Médica

La versión alterna de esta publicación está disponible en

www.ahrq.gov/consumer como publicación. No. AHRQ 03-M007.

Centros de Servicios de

Medicare y Medicaid

CMS Pub. No. 11123-S

Marzo 2005
Exhibit 10.11



 Exhibit 10.11 
  





 
 December 31, 2015 

Tivanka Ellawala 
 ##### ## ## ##### 

Bellevue, WA 98005 
 Dear Tiv: 

Effective September 15, 2015, you transitioned from the role of Chief Financial Officer of Endurance International Group, Inc. (“EIG” or the
“Company”) to head of e-commerce for the Company. In connection with this transition and in consideration for your continued employment with EIG, you and the Company hereby agree that effective as of the date hereof (the “Effective
Date”): 
 (i) The unvested portion of the restricted stock award granted to you on January 8, 2013, which unvested portion consists of 83,435
shares of Company common stock as of the date hereof, is hereby cancelled and you shall have no further rights with respect thereto after the Effective Date; 

(ii) The unvested portion of the nonstatutory stock option granted to you on October 25, 2013 (the “2013 NSO”), which unvested portion consists
of options with respect to 72,571 shares of Company common stock as of the date hereof, is hereby cancelled and you shall have no further rights with respect thereto after the Effective Date. The portion of the 2013 NSO that is vested as of the date
hereof, comprised of options with respect to 91,032 shares of Company common, stock shall remain outstanding and be exercisable pursuant to the terms of the applicable stock option agreement and the Company’s stock incentive plan; 

(iii) The unvested portion of the incentive stock option granted to you on October 25, 2013 (the “2013 ISO”), which unvested portion consists
of options with respect to 29,068 shares of Company common stock as of the date hereof, is hereby cancelled and you shall have no further rights with respect thereto after the Effective Date. The portion of the 2013 ISO that is vested as of the date
hereof, comprised of options with respect to 29,068 shares of Company common stock, shall remain outstanding and be exercisable pursuant to the terms of the applicable stock option agreement and the Company’s stock incentive plan; and 

(iv) The unvested portion of the restricted stock award granted to you on October 25, 2013, which unvested portion consists of 19,567 shares of Company
common stock as of the date hereof, shall continue to vest and remain outstanding pursuant to the terms of the applicable restricted stock agreement and the Company’s stock incentive plan. 

  
  

10 Corporate Drive, Suite 300, Burlington, MA 01803 t: 781-852-3200 f: 781-272-2915 www.enduranceinternational.com 









  
 Page 2 of 2 

 

 Please sign below to agree to and acknowledge your consent to the foregoing. 

Sincerely, 
  

	
	 /s/ Hari Ravichandran

	 Hari Ravichandran, Chief Executive Officer

	
	 Acknowledged and Agreed:

	
	 /s/ Tivanka Ellawala

	 Tivanka Ellawala

	
	 Date: 12/28/2015


  
 



 

  
  

10 Corporate Drive, Suite 300, Burlington, MA 01803 t: 781-852-3200 f: 781-272-2918 www.enduranceinternational.com