alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

                Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in hiscapacity as an officer of August Technology Corporation (the “Company”), forpurposes of 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

 

(1)                                  TheQuarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Date:May 10, 2005
|   |   | /s/ Jeff L. O’Dell |   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Jeff L. O’Dell     |   |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

 
|   |   | /s/ Stanley D. Piekos   |   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Stanley D. Piekos       |   |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to August Technology Corporation and will be retained by August Technology Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
### §4908. Effect on other laws and agreements

#### (a) Effect on State law

#### (1) In general

With respect to any residential mortgage or residential mortgage transaction consummated after the effective date of this chapter, and except as provided in paragraph (2), the provisions of this chapter shall supersede any provisions of the law of any State relating to requirements for obtaining or maintaining private mortgage insurance in connection with residential mortgage transactions, cancellation or automatic termination of such private mortgage insurance, any disclosure of information addressed by this chapter, and any other matter specifically addressed by this chapter.

#### (2) Protection of existing State laws

#### (A) In general

The provisions of this chapter do not supersede protected State laws, except to the extent that the protected State laws are inconsistent with any provision of this chapter, and then only to the extent of the inconsistency.

#### (B) Inconsistencies

A protected State law shall not be considered to be inconsistent with a provision of this chapter if the protected State law—

(i) requires termination of private mortgage insurance or other mortgage guaranty insurance—

(I) at a date earlier than as provided in this chapter; or

(II) when a mortgage principal balance is achieved that is higher than as provided in this chapter; or

(ii) requires disclosure of information—

(I) that provides more information than the information required by this chapter; or

(II) more often or at a date earlier than is required by this chapter.

#### (C) Protected State laws

For purposes of this paragraph, the term "protected State law" means a State law—

(i) regarding any requirements relating to private mortgage insurance in connection with residential mortgage transactions;

(ii) that was enacted not later than 2 years after July 29, 1998; and

(iii) that is the law of a State that had in effect, on or before January 2, 1998, any State law described in clause (i).

#### (b) Effect on other agreements

The provisions of this chapter shall supersede any conflicting provision contained in any agreement relating to the servicing of a residential mortgage loan entered into by the Federal National Mortgage Association, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, or any private investor or note holder (or any successors thereto).

(Pub. L. 105–216, §9, July 29, 1998, 112 Stat. 906.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The effective date of this chapter, referred to in subsec. (a)(1), is 1 year after July 29, 1998, see section 13 of Pub. L. 105–216, set out as an Effective Date note under section 4901 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 1 year after July 29, 1998, see section 13 of Pub. L. 105–216, set out as a note under section 4901 of this title.
### §943. Arms and ammunition; immunity from taxation

No tax on the sale or transfer of firearms, pistols, revolvers, shells, or cartridges may be imposed on such articles when bought with funds appropriated for the Coast Guard.

(Added Pub. L. 87–526, §1(6), July 10, 1962, 76 Stat. 142, §655; amended Pub. L. 94–546, §1(37), Oct. 18, 1976, 90 Stat. 2522; renumbered §943, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §107(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4205.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 655 of this title as this section.

1976—Pub. L. 94–546 struck out "United States" before "Coast Guard".
# C_2011160EN.01002202.xml

| 28.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 160/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 160/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 April 2011 — Zitro IP v OHIM — Show Ball Informática (BINGO SHOWALL)

(Case T-179/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark BINGO SHOWALL - Earlier figurative Community trade mark SHOW BALL - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2011/C 160/35

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Zitro IP Sàrl (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: A. Canela Giménez, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carillo, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Show Ball Informática Ltda (São Paulo, Brazil)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 9 February 2010 (Case R 666/2009-2) concerning opposition proceedings between Zitro IP Sàrl and Show Ball Informática Ltda

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Zitro IP Sàrl to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Zitro IP Sàrl to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 161, 19.6.2010.

1

---
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Marion J. McCormick certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Power3 Medical Products, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for the periods presented in this report;

4.

The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

a.

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c.

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting to the small business issuers auditors and audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a.

All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

b.

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  November 14, 2007



| |     |                         
| | --- | ------------------------
| | By: | /s/ MARIONJ. MCCORMICK  
| |     | Marion J. McCormick     
| |     | Chief Accounting Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 55 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 55

To provide for the unencumbering of title to non-Federal land owned by 
 the city of Tucson, Arizona, for purposes of economic development by 
      conveyance of the Federal reversionary interest to the City.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 8, 2019

Ms. McSally (for herself and Ms. Sinema) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the unencumbering of title to non-Federal land owned by 
 the city of Tucson, Arizona, for purposes of economic development by 
      conveyance of the Federal reversionary interest to the City.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Udall Park Land Exchange Completion 
Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) City.--The term ``City'' means the city of Tucson, 
        Arizona.
            (2) Non-federal land.--The term ``non-Federal land'' means 
        the approximately 172.8-acre parcel of City land identified in 
        the patent numbered 02-90-0001 and dated October 4, 1989, and 
        more particularly described as lots 3 and 4, S\1/2\NW\1/4\, 
        sec. 5, T.14 S., R.15 E., Gila and Salt River Meridian, 
        Arizona.
            (3) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of the Interior.

SEC. 3. CONVEYANCE OF FEDERAL REVERSIONARY INTEREST IN LAND LOCATED IN 
              TUCSON, ARIZONA.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 
Secretary shall convey to the City, without consideration, the 
reversionary interests of the United States in and to the non-Federal 
land for the purpose of unencumbering the title to the non-Federal land 
to enable economic development of the non-Federal land.
    (b) Legal Descriptions.--As soon as practicable after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the exact legal descriptions of the non-Federal 
land shall be determined in a manner satisfactory to the Secretary.
    (c) Additional Terms and Conditions.--The Secretary may require 
such additional terms and conditions to the conveyance under subsection 
(a), consistent with that subsection, as the Secretary considers 
appropriate to protect the interests of the United States.
    (d) Costs.--The City shall pay all costs associated with the 
conveyance under subsection, consistent with that subsection, including 
the costs of any surveys, recording costs, and other reasonable costs.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32

Certifications Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(18 U.S.C. section 1350)

The undersigned officers of
TerreStar Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the Company), do hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge:

(i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Robert H. BrumleyRobert H. Brumley President and Chief Executive
Officer (Principal Executive Officer) March 31,
2008/s/ Neil L. HazardNeil L. Hazard Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) March 31, 2008


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to TerreStar
Corporation and will be retained by TerreStar Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 1301.68 Identification and marking. ( a ) Classified information shall be marked pursuant to the standards set forth in section 1.6, Identification and Marking, of the Executive Order; Information Security Oversight Office implementing directives in 32 CFR part 2001, subpart B; and internal TVA procedures.
( b ) Foreign government information shall retain its original classification markings or be marked and classified at a U.S. classification level that provides a degree of protection at least equivalent to that required by the entity that furnished the information. Foreign government information retaining its original classification markings need not be assigned a U.S. classification marking provided the responsible agency determines that the foreign government markings are adequate to meet the purposes served by U.S. classification markings.
( c ) Information assigned a level of classification under predecessor executive orders shall be considered as classified at that level of classification.
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Seeks Applications for Rural Energy for America Program

WASHINGTON, July 26, 2021 – USDA Deputy Under Secretary for Rural Development Justin Maxson today 

announced that the department is accepting applications for loan guarantees and grants for renewable energy 

systems; and to make energy efficiency improvements, conduct energy audits and provide development 

assistance.

Funds are being made available under the Rural Energy for America Program (REAP). USDA is seeking

applications for Fiscal Year 2022 funding. The deadlines to apply for grants are Oct. 31, 2021, and March 31, 

2022. Applications for technical assistance grants are due Jan. 31, 2022. Applications for loan guarantees are 

accepted year-round.

Agricultural producers and rural small businesses are eligible applicants for loan guarantees and grants for 

renewable energy systems and to make energy efficiency improvements. State and local governments, 

federally-recognized tribes, land-grant colleges or universities or other institutions of higher education, rural 

electric cooperatives, public power entities, and Resource Conservation & Development Councils (as defined in 

16 USC §3451) are eligible applicants for grants to conduct energy audits and provide development assistance.

Interested applicants are encouraged to contact their local USDA Rural Development State Energy Coordinator

well in advance of the application deadlines to discuss their project and ask any questions about the REAP

program or the application process. 

Additional information on the required materials and how to apply for the REAP program are available on page

40000 of the July 26, 2021, Federal Register.

If you’d like to subscribe to USDA Rural Development updates, visit our GovDelivery subscriber page.

###

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Announces Funding for High Energy Cost Grants 

(Oct. 15, 2015) – Agriculture Under Secretary Lisa Mensah today announced the availability of 

up to $10 million in competitive grants to assist communities with extremely high energy costs. 

Grants in the High Energy Cost program are available to communities with annual residential 

energy costs exceeding 275 percent of the national average. The grants may be used to acquire, 

construct, extend, upgrade or otherwise improve energy generation, transmission or distribution 

facilities serving eligible communities. They may also be used to install on- and off-grid 

renewable energy systems and to make energy efficiency improvements.

For details on eligibility and application requirements and how to obtain application materials, 

see page 61336 of the October 13, 2015 Federal Register. 

The application deadline is December 14, 2015.
### **CHAPTER 23—DISSEMINATION OF TECHNICAL, SCIENTIFIC AND ENGINEERING INFORMATION**

Sec.
1151.
Purpose of chapter.
1152.
Clearinghouse for technical information; removal of security classification.
1153.
Rules, regulations, and fees.
1153a.
Repealed.
1154.
Reference of data to armed services and other Government agencies.
1155.
General standards and limitations; preservation of security classification.
1156.
Use of existing facilities.
1157.
Relation to other provisions.
Exhibit 23.2 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-12411, 333-93201, 333-72648, 333-85246, 333-108167 and333-114304) and the Registration Statement on Form S-2 (File Nos. 333-36798, 333-46988, 333-77014, 333-106033 and 333-121915) of Cambridge Heart, Inc. of our report dated March 25, 2004 relating to the financial statements which appears in this Form10-K. 

 

/s/    PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

Boston, Massachusetts 

March 30, 2005
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Theresa Soto, Appellant.

[824 NYS2d 286]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward J. McLaughlin, J.), rendered March 5, 2004, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing her to concurrent terms of 1 to 3 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Defendant’s arguments are substantially similar to arguments that this Court rejected on a codefendant’s appeal *(People v DeJesus,*30 AD3d 1132 [2006], *lv denied*7 NY3d 811 [2006]). There is no basis for *341disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning credibility. The evidence supported the conclusion that defendant was a participant in the sale and a joint possessor of the drugs *(see People v Bello,*92 NY2d 523 [1998]; *see also People v Bundy,*90 NY2d 918, 920 [1997]). In particular, there was evidence supporting the inference that as the police approached the van from which drugs were being sold, defendant attempted to hide drugs in the crevice of a seat. We have considered and rejected defendant’s remaining arguments. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Each of the undersignedhereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of August TechnologyCorporation (the “Company”), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adoptedpursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of hisknowledge:

 

(1)                                  TheQuarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date:May 5, 2004
|   | /s/ JEFF L. O’DELL |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Jeff L. O’Dell     |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                    |
|   |                    |
|   | /s/ STANLEY D. PIEKOS   |   |
|   | Stanley D. Piekos       |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|        |                         |        |  |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to August Technology Corporation and will be retained by August Technology Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
### §2510. Use of electric and hybrid vehicles by Federal agencies

The Postmaster General of the United States Postal Service, the Administrator of the General Services Administration, the Secretary of Defense, and the heads of other Federal agencies shall—

(1) carry out a study of the practicability of using electric and hybrid vehicles in the performance of some or all of the functions of their agencies; and

(2) arrange for the introduction of electric and hybrid vehicles into their fleets as soon as possible.

For competitive procurement purposes in purchasing such vehicles, life-cycle costing and any beneficial air pollution control characteristics of electric and hybrid vehicles shall be fully taken into account. If the head of the agency involved determines that electric or hybrid vehicles are technologically practicable, but that they are not completely economically competitive with conventional vehicles, the Secretary of Energy may, for purposes of the demonstration program described in section 2506 of this title, pay to such agency the incremental costs of the electric or hybrid vehicles, including differential operating costs.

(Pub. L. 94–413, §11, Sept. 17, 1976, 90 Stat. 1268; Pub. L. 95–91, title III, §301(a), Aug. 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 577.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

"Secretary of Energy" substituted in text for "Administrator" pursuant to section 301(a) of Pub. L. 95–91, see Codification note set out under section 2502 of this title.
#### § 98.37 [Reserved]