alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 5.1 Pay. ( a ) *Pay principles.* Pay of the employees of GAO shall be fixed by the Comptroller General consistent with the principles that— ( 1 ) There be equal pay for work of substantially equal value.
( 2 ) Pay distinctions be maintained in keeping with work and performance distinctions.
( 3 ) Pay rates be comparable with private enterprise pay rates for the same levels of work.
( 4 ) Pay levels be interrelated to the General Schedule.
( b ) *Pay rates.* ( 1 ) The Comptroller General shall publish a schedule of pay rates which shall apply to GAO employees. Except as provided in paragraph (b) (2) of this section, and regulations for the GAO Senior Executive Service, the highest rate under such schedule shall not exceed the highest rate of basic pay payable for grade GS-15 under the General Schedule.
( 2 ) Such schedule may provide for rates which do not exceed the maximum rate payable for grade GS-18 of the General Schedule for up to one hundred employees, reduced by the number of employees who are in the GAO Senior Executive Service, other than those in such service pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 733(c).
( c ) *Pay adjustments.* Except as provided in regulations for the GAO Senior Executive Service and the Merit Pay System, the pay of GAO employees shall be adjusted at the same time and to the same extent as rates of basic pay are adjusted for the General Schedule.
[45 FR 68377, Oct. 15, 1980, as amended at 47 FR 56979, Dec. 22, 1982]
# C_2011030EN.01004101.xml

| 29.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/41

---

Action brought on 9 November 2010 — Confortel Gestión v OHIM — Homargrup (CONFORTEL AQUA 4)

(Case T-521/10)

()

2011/C 30/74

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Confortel Gestión, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: I. Valdelomar Serrano)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Homargrup, SA (Santa Susana, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of 5 August 2010 in Case R 1359/2009-2, and consequently register Community trade mark No 5.276.951 ‘CONFORTEL Aqua 4’ for all of the classes sought, and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of 5 August 2010 in Case R 1359/2009-2, and consequently register Community trade mark No 5.276.951 ‘CONFORTEL Aqua 4’ for all of the classes sought, and

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Confortel Gestión, SA.

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘CONFORTEL Aqua 4’ for services in Classes 41, 43 and 44.

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Homargrup, SA.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community word mark ‘AQUA’ and Community figurative mark ‘A AQUA HOTEL’ and Spanish word marks ‘AQUAMARINA’ and ‘AQUATEL’, and Spanish figurative mark ‘AQUAMAR’, for services in Class 42.

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld.

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Plea in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, (1) since there is no likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue.

Plea in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

1

---
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
### §278p. Notice to Congress

#### (a) Notice of reprogramming

If any funds authorized for carrying out this chapter are subject to a reprogramming action that requires notice to be provided to the Appropriations Committees of the House of Representatives and the Senate, notice of such action shall concurrently be provided to the Committee on Science of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate.

#### (b) Notice of reorganization

#### (1) Requirement

The Secretary shall provide notice to the Committees on Science and Appropriations of the House of Representatives, and the Committees on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and Appropriations of the Senate, not later than 15 days before any major reorganization of any program, project, or activity of the Institute.

#### (2) "Major reorganization" defined

For purposes of this subsection, the term "major reorganization" means any reorganization of the Institute that involves the reassignment of more than 25 percent of the employees of the Institute.

(Mar. 3, 1901, ch. 872, §31, as added Pub. L. 105–309, §4(b), Oct. 30, 1998, 112 Stat. 2935.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on Science of House of Representatives changed to Committee on Science and Technology of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 6, One Hundred Tenth Congress, Jan. 5, 2007. Committee on Science and Technology of House of Representatives changed to Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 5, One Hundred Twelfth Congress, Jan. 5, 2011.
# C_2013114EN.01003102.xml

| 20.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 114/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 114/31

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 March 2013 — Rütgers Germany and Others v ECHA

(Case T-96/10) (1)

1

(REACH - Identification of anthracene oil (anthracene paste) as a substance of very high concern - Actions for annulment - Actionable measure - Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures - Direct concern - Admissibility - Equal treatment - Proportionality)

2013/C 114/49

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Rütgers Germany GmbH (Castrop-Rauxel, Germany), Rütgers Belgium NV(Zelzate, Belgium), Deza, a.s.(Valašske Meziříčí, Czech Republic), Koppers Denmark A/S(Nyborg, Denmark), Koppers UK Ltd(Scunthorpe, United Kingdom) (represented initially by: K. Van Maldegem, R. Cana, lawyers, and P. Sellar, Solicitor, and subsequently by Van Maldegem and Cana)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (represented by: M. Heikkilä and W. Broere, acting as Agents, assisted by J. Stuyck, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action for the partial annulment of the decision of the ECHA, published on 13 January 2010, to identify anthracene oil (anthracene paste) (EC No 292-603-2) as a substance meeting the criteria set out in Article 57 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC, in accordance with Article 59 of REACH.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Rütgers Germany GmbH, Rütgers Belgium NV, Deza, a.s., Koppers Denmark A/S and Koppers UK Ltd to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Rütgers Germany GmbH, Rütgers Belgium NV, Deza, a.s., Koppers Denmark A/S and Koppers UK Ltd to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 113, 1.5.2010.

1

---
# C_2010209EN.01003002.xml

| 31.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/30

---

Action brought on 2 June 2010 — European Commission v Czech Republic

(Case C-276/10)

()

2010/C 209/42

Language of the case: Czech

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: S. Pardo Quintillán and L. Jelínek, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Czech Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to transpose Directive 2006/118/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on the protection of groundwater against pollution and deterioration or, in any event, by failing to inform the Commission thereof, the Czech Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 12 of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to transpose Directive 2006/118/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on the protection of groundwater against pollution and deterioration or, in any event, by failing to inform the Commission thereof, the Czech Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 12 of that directive;

1

| — | order Czech Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Czech Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The time-limit for transposition of the directive into national law expired on 16 January 2009.

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 372, p. 19.

1

---
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 11.01
                                       
                                  Canmax Inc.
                       Computation of Earnings per Share

<TABLE>
                                            Years Ended October 31,
                                         1997        1996         1995
                                      ----------  ----------   -----------
<S>                                   <C>         <C>          <C>
Primary earnings (loss) per share:

Net income (loss)                     $   87,331  $  142,614   $(3,734,450)
                                      ----------  ----------   -----------
                                      ----------  ----------   -----------

Weighted average common shares         5,827,262   4,983,011     4,706,382

Shares issued upon assumed exercise 
  of dilutive stock options and 
  warrants                             1,181,590   2,448,269             -

Shares assumed repurchased              (359,211)   (580,132)            -
                                      ----------  ----------   -----------

Weighted average common and common 
  equivalent shares                    6,649,641   6,851,148     4,706,382
                                      ----------  ----------   -----------
                                      ----------  ----------   -----------

Net income (loss) per common and 
  common equivalent share             $     0.01  $     0.02   $     (0.79)
                                      ----------  ----------   -----------
                                      ----------  ----------   -----------

Fully diluted earnings (loss) 
  per share:

Net income (loss)                     $   87,331  $  142,614   $(3,734,450)
                                      ----------  ----------   -----------
                                      ----------  ----------   -----------

Weighted average common shares         5,827,262   4,983,011     4,706,382

Shares issued upon assumed 
  exercise of dilutive stock 
  options and warrants                 1,181,590   2,448,269             -

Shares assumed repurchased              (353,887)   (580,132)            -
                                      ----------  ----------   -----------

Weighted average common and 
  common equivalent shares             6,654,965   6,851,148     4,706,382
                                      ----------  ----------   -----------
                                      ----------  ----------   -----------

Net income (loss) per common and 
  common equivalent share             $     0.01  $     0.02   $     (0.79)
                                      ----------  ----------   -----------
                                      ----------  ----------   -----------
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2
 Written Statement of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (a)
    
    the Form 10-Q Report of the Company for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 filed
on the date hereof with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and(b)
    
    information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
 /s/ PAUL M. PARRISHPaul  M. ParrishChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
FORM RD 2006-46 (Rev. 01-98)

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE MANUAL ISSUE No.

RURAL DEVELOPMENT WSAL PN 574

Washington, D.C 20250 DATE

February 6, 2023

PROCEDURE NOTICE

RD MANUAL CHANGES

INSERT RD INS 440.1 INTEREST RATES, AMORTIZATION, 

(WSAL) GUARANTEE FEE, ANNUAL CHARGE, AND 

FIXED PERIOD. This Instruction is 

partially revised as follows:

Exhibit B is partially revised to update the Treasury Judgement rate and the 

effective date of February 1, 2023.

INSERT

Exhibit B: Pages 1 & 2.

RD HANDBOOK CHANGES 

INSERT RD HB-1-3550 DIRECT SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING LOANS AND GRANTS

(WSAL) - FIELD OFFICE HANDBOOK. This Handbook is 

partially revised. Specific revisions 

include: 

Appendix 13 is being added to this Handbook to address the following Self-Help 

housing loan topics:

Appendix 13:

• Overview of Self-Help housing. 

• Application processing priority.

• Loan application packaging.

• Environmental reviews. 

• Appraisals (specifically accepting appraisals obtained by Grantees). 

• Selecting a contractor, construction documents, and subcontracts.

• Administering construction funds and inspections.

• Post-closing leveraged loans/grants.

• Participant withdrawal.

• Construction closeout.

• Self-Help take-out loans.

• Other financing. 

INSERT

Appendix 13 dated 02-06-23.

oOo

READ PROCEDURE - DISCUSS IN STAFF CONFERENCE - KEEP PROCEDURE MANUAL UP TO DATE
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 44 (Monday, March 7, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 12373]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5162]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL COUNCIL ON DISABILITY


Sunshine Act Meetings; Correction

SUMMARY: The National Council on Disability published a notice in the 
Federal Register of February 28, 2011, concerning a meeting of the 
Council. This document contains a correction to the times of the 
meeting.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Anne Sommers, NCD, 1331 F Street, 
NW., Suite 850, Washington, DC 20004; 202-272-2004 (V), 202-272-2074 
(TTY).
    In the Federal Register of February 28, 2011, in FR Doc. 11-4463, 
on page 10916, in the second column, correct the ``Times and Dates'' 
caption to read:

TIME AND DATES: The board meeting will be held on Thursday, March 10, 
2011, 10:30 a.m.-5 p.m., ET, and Friday, March 11, 2011, 9 a.m.-10:30 
a.m. ET, and from 2-3:30 p.m. ET, if necessary.
    In the same Federal Register of February 28, 2011, in FR Doc. 11-
4463, on page 10916, in the second column, please correct the ``Matters 
to be Considered'' caption to read:

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The tentative agenda for the board meeting 
includes annual ethics training, a demonstration of the agency's 
website redesign, a possible speaker from the U.S. Department of Health 
and Human Services, the ``Living'' regional forum, a review of the 
agency's budget and strategic plan implementation, and other items, to 
be determined. A portion of the meeting from 2 p.m.-3:30 p.m. ET on 
Friday, March 11, 2011 may be closed to discuss internal personnel 
rules and practices, pursuant to paragraph (c)(2) of the Sunshine Act, 
and in accordance with a determination made by the NCD Chairman.

    Dated: March 3, 2011.
Aaron Bishop,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2011-5162 Filed 3-3-11; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-MA-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 11, 2021

t0609

Order 

Clerk

June 11, 2021

160034 (115)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 160034

COA: 345268

Saginaw CC: 84-000570-FC

ROBIN RICK MANNING,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s December 28, 

2020 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

reconsideration of our previous order is warranted. MCR 7.311(G).
PUBLIC LAW 113–220—DEC. 16, 2014 128 STAT. 2093 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4443: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 160 (2014): 

Sept. 8, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 3, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 113–220 

113th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 90 Vermilyea 

Avenue, in New York, New York, as the ‘‘Corporal Juan Mariel Alcantara Post 

Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. CORPORAL JUAN MARIEL ALCANTARA POST OFFICE 

BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 90 Vermilyea Avenue, in New York, New York, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Corporal Juan Mariel 

Alcantara Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Corporal Juan Mariel Alcantara Post Office Building’’. 

Approved December 16, 2014. 

Dec. 16, 2014 

[H.R. 4443] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLAWS
NUMBER 13

- 18

- 00568

- CV



### COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

SERVICE CORPORATION

INTERNATIONAL AND

SCI TEXAS FUNERAL

SERVICES, INC. JOINT LY

D/B/A VALLEY MEMORIAL

GARDENS

, OCTAVIO PADILLA,

AND DANIEL GARZA

, Appellant s

,

v.

VIRGINIA MARTINEZ, E T AL.

, Appellee s

.

On Agreed Motion to Stay Appeal

.



### ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Hinojosa

Order Per Curiam

This is an interlocutory appeal of an order, dated September 24, 2018, granting in

part and denying in part a motion to compel arbitration filed by appellants. Th e matter is2

before the Court on an “ Agreed Motion to Stay Appeal” jointly filed by appellants and

appel lees. The parties represent in the motion that the defendants have filed a second

motion to compel arbitration in the trial court which addresses new parties and claims ;

that the arbitrability issues in that motion are substantively similar to the issues in the

current appeal ; and that the trial court has set the pending motion for a hearing on

February 27, 2019 . The parties ask us to stay the appeal for sixty days to conserve the

Court’s and the parties resources , as the trial court’s ruling s on the pending motion may

be reviewable in the instant appeal

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 29. 6(a)(1).

Having reviewed the parties’ motion and the record, this Court is of the opinion that

the motion is meritorious and should be granted . Accordingly, we hereby GRANT the

motion and ABATE the appeal for sixty (60) days or until further order of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed the

19th day of February, 201 9

.
### §2103. Enforcement by Federal Trade Commission

#### (a) Statutory authority

Except as provided in section 2102 of this title, this chapter shall be enforced by the Federal Trade Commission under the Federal Trade Commission Act [15 U.S.C. 41 et seq.].

#### (b) Incorporation of Federal Trade Commission Act provisions

The Commission shall prevent any person from violating the provisions of this chapter in the same manner, by the same means, and with the same jurisdiction, powers, and duties as though all applicable terms and provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act [15 U.S.C. 41 et seq.] were incorporated into and made a part of this chapter; and any such person violating the provisions of this chapter shall be subject to the penalties and entitled to the privileges and immunities provided in said Federal Trade Commission Act, in the same manner, by the same means, and with the same jurisdiction, powers, and duties as though the applicable terms and provisions of the said Federal Trade Commission Act were incorporated into and made a part of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 93–167, §4, Nov. 29, 1973, 87 Stat. 686.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal Trade Commission Act, referred to in text, is act Sept. 26, 1914, ch. 311, 38 Stat. 717, which is classified generally to subchapter I (§41 et seq.) of chapter 2 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 58 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section applicable only to imitation political items and imitation numismatic items manufactured after Nov. 29, 1973, see section 8 of Pub. L. 93–167, set out as a note under section 2101 of this title.