Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 245 / Monday, December 22, 2014 / Notices 76385 

consultants, accountants, attorneys, or 

other agents, provide written notice of 

such hiring and the rate of 

compensation to defendants and the 

United States. 

F. The Monitoring Trustee shall have 

no responsibility or obligation for the 

operation of defendants’ businesses. 

G. Defendants shall use their best 

efforts to assist the Monitoring Trustee 

in monitoring defendants’ compliance 

with their individual obligations under 

this Final Judgment and under the Hold 

Separate Stipulation and Order. The 

Monitoring Trustee and any consultants, 

accountants, attorneys, and other agents 

retained by the Monitoring Trustee shall 

have full and complete access to the 

personnel, books, records, and facilities 

relating to compliance with this Final 

Judgment, subject to reasonable 

protection for trade secret or other 

confidential research, development, or 

commercial information or any 

applicable privileges. Defendants shall 

take no action to interfere with or to 

impede the Monitoring Trustee’s 

accomplishment of its responsibilities. 

H. After its appointment, the 

Monitoring Trustee shall file reports 

monthly, or more frequently as needed, 

with the United States, and, as 

appropriate, the Court setting forth 

defendants’ efforts to comply with its 

obligations under this Final Judgment 

and under the Hold Separate Stipulation 

and Order. To the extent such reports 

contain information that the Monitoring 

Trustee deems confidential, such 

reports shall not be filed in the public 

docket of the Court. 

I. The Monitoring Trustee shall serve 

until the divestiture of all the 

Divestiture Assets is finalized pursuant 

to either Section IV or Section V of this 

Final Judgment and the expiration of 

any continuing transition services 

agreement. 

J. If the United States determines that 

the Monitoring Trustee has ceased to act 

or failed to act diligently or in a 

reasonably cost-effective manner, it may 

recommend the Court appoint a 

substitute Monitoring Trustee. 

XI. Compliance Inspection 

A. For the purposes of determining or 

securing compliance with this Final 

Judgment, or of any related orders such 

as any Hold Separate Order, or of 

determining whether the Final 

Judgment should be modified or 

vacated, and subject to any legally 

recognized privilege, from time to time 

authorized representatives of the United 

States Department of Justice, including 

consultants and other persons retained 

by the United States, shall, upon written 

request of an authorized representative 

of the Assistant Attorney General in 

charge of the Antitrust Division, and on 

reasonable notice to defendants, be 

permitted: 

(1) access during defendants’ office 

hours to inspect and copy, or at the 

option of the United States, to require 

defendants to provide hard copy or 

electronic copies of, all books, ledgers, 

accounts, records, data, and documents 

in the possession, custody, or control of 

defendants, relating to any matters 

contained in this Final Judgment; and 

(2) to interview, either informally or 

on the record, defendants’ officers, 

employees, or agents, who may have 

their individual counsel present, 

regarding such matters. The interviews 

shall be subject to the reasonable 

convenience of the interviewee and 

without restraint or interference by 

defendants. 

B. Upon the written request of an 

authorized representative of the 

Assistant Attorney General in charge of 

the Antitrust Division, defendants shall 

submit written reports or response to 

written interrogatories, under oath if 

requested, relating to any of the matters 

contained in this Final Judgment as may 

be requested. 

C. No information or documents 

obtained by the means provided in this 

section shall be divulged by the United 

States to any person other than an 

authorized representative of the 

executive branch of the United States, 

except in the course of legal proceedings 

to which the United States is a party 

(including grand jury proceedings), or 

for the purpose of securing compliance 

with this Final Judgment, or as 

otherwise required by law. 

D. If at the time information or 

documents are furnished by defendants 

to the United States, defendants 

represent and identify in writing the 

material in any such information or 

documents to which a claim of 

protection may be asserted under Rule 

26(c)(1)(g) of the Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure, and defendants mark each 

pertinent page of such material, 

‘‘Subject to claim of protection under 

Rule 26(c)(1)(g) of the Federal Rules of 

Civil Procedure,’’ then the United States 

shall give defendants ten (10) calendar 

days notice prior to divulging such 

material in any legal proceeding (other 

than a grand jury proceeding). 

XII. No Reacquisition 

Defendants may not reacquire any 

part of the Divestiture Assets during the 

term of this Final Judgment. 

XIII. Retention of Jurisdiction 

This Court retains jurisdiction to 

enable any party to this Final Judgment 

to apply to this Court at any time for 

further orders and directions as may be 

necessary or appropriate to carry out or 

construe this Final Judgment, to modify 

any of its provisions, to enforce 

compliance, and to punish violations of 

its provisions. 

XIV. Expiration of Final Judgment 

Unless this Court grants an extension, 

this Final Judgment shall expire ten 

years from the date of its entry. 

XV. Public Interest Determination 

Entry of this Final Judgment is in the 

public interest. The parties have 

complied with the requirements of the 

Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 

15 U.S.C. § 16, including making copies 

available to the public of this Final 

Judgment, the Competitive Impact 

Statement, and any comments thereon 

and the United States’ responses to 

comments. Based upon the record 

before the Court, which includes the 

Competitive Impact Statement and any 

comments and response to comments 

filed with the Court, entry of this Final 

Judgment is in the public interest. 

Date: llllllllllllllllll

Court approval subject to procedures of 

Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 15 

U.S.C. § 16 

lllllllllllllllllllll

United States District Judge 

[FR Doc. 2014–29862 Filed 12–19–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Office of the Secretary 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Submission for OMB 

Review; Comment Request; Office of 

Federal Contract Compliance 

Programs Construction Recordkeeping 

and Reporting Requirements 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Labor 

(DOL) is submitting the Office of 

Federal Contract Compliance Programs 

sponsored information collection 

request (ICR) titled, ‘‘Office of Federal 

Contract Compliance Programs 

Construction Recordkeeping and 

Reporting Requirements,’’ to the Office 

of Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and approval for continued use, 

without change, in accordance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 

(PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. Public 

comments on the ICR are invited. 

DATES: The OMB will consider all 

written comments that agency receives 

on or before January 21, 2015. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
76386 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 245 / Monday, December 22, 2014 / Notices 

ADDRESSES: A copy of this ICR with 

applicable supporting documentation; 

including a description of the likely 

respondents, proposed frequency of 

response, and estimated total burden 

may be obtained free of charge from the 

RegInfo.gov Web site at http://

www.reginfo.gov/public/do/

PRAViewICR?ref_nbr=201406-1250-001 

(this link will only become active on the 

day following publication of this notice) 

or by contacting Michel Smyth by 

telephone at 202–693–4129, TTY 202– 

693–8064, (these are not toll-free 

numbers) or by email at DOL_PRA_

PUBLIC@dol.gov. 

Submit comments about this request 

by mail or courier to the Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs, 

Attn: OMB Desk Officer for DOL– 

OFCCP, Office of Management and 

Budget, Room 10235, 725 17th Street 

NW., Washington, DC 20503; by Fax: 

202–395–5806 (this is not a toll-free 

number); or by email: OIRA_

submission@omb.eop.gov. Commenters 

are encouraged, but not required, to 

send a courtesy copy of any comments 

by mail or courier to the U.S. 

Department of Labor-OASAM, Office of 

the Chief Information Officer, Attn: 

Departmental Information Compliance 

Management Program, Room N1301, 

200 Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20210; or by email: 

DOL_PRA_PUBLIC@dol.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Contact Michel Smyth by telephone at 

202–693–4129, TTY 202–693–8064, 

(these are not toll-free numbers) or by 

email at DOL_PRA_PUBLIC@dol.gov. 

Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3507(a)(1)(D). 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This ICR 

seeks to extend PRA authority for Office 

of Federal Contract Compliance 

Programs (OFCCP) construction 

recordkeeping and reporting 

requirements. The OFCCP administers 

three nondiscrimination and equal 

employment opportunity laws: 

Executive Order 11246, as amended; 

Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended 

section 503 (29 U.S.C. 793); and 

Vietnam Era Veterans’ Readjustment 

Assistance Act of 1974, as amended 

section 4212 (38 U.S.C. 4212). These 

authorities prohibit employment 

discrimination and require covered 

Federal contractors to take affirmative 

action to ensure that equal employment 

opportunities are available regardless of 

race, sex, color, national origin, religion, 

or status as an individual with a 

disability or protected veteran. 

Recordkeeping and reporting by Federal 

and Federally assisted construction 

contractors and subcontractors is 

necessary to substantiate their 

compliance with nondiscrimination and 

affirmative action contractual 

obligations. 

This information collection is subject 

to the PRA. A Federal agency generally 

cannot conduct or sponsor a collection 

of information, and the public is 

generally not required to respond to an 

information collection, unless it is 

approved by the OMB under the PRA 

and displays a currently valid OMB 

Control Number. In addition, 

notwithstanding any other provisions of 

law, no person shall generally be subject 

to penalty for failing to comply with a 

collection of information that does not 

display a valid Control Number. See 5 

CFR 1320.5(a) and 1320.6. The DOL 

obtains OMB approval for this 

information collection under Control 

Number 1250–0001. 

OMB authorization for an ICR cannot 

be for more than three (3) years without 

renewal, and the current approval for 

this collection is scheduled to expire on 

December 31, 2014. The DOL seeks to 

extend PRA authorization for this 

information collection for three (3) more 

years, without any change to existing 

requirements. The DOL notes that 

existing information collection 

requirements submitted to the OMB 

receive a month-to-month extension 

while they undergo review. For 

additional substantive information 

about this ICR, see the related notice 

published in the Federal Register on 

September 2, 2014 (79 FR 52044). 

Interested parties are encouraged to 

send comments to the OMB, Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs at 

the address shown in the ADDRESSES

section within thirty (30) days of 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register. In order to help ensure 

appropriate consideration, comments 

should mention OMB Control Number 

1250–0001. The OMB is particularly 

interested in comments that: 

• Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

• Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

• Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

• Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including through the 

use of appropriate automated, 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology, 

e.g., permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Agency: DOL–OFCCP. 

Title of Collection: Office of Federal 

Contract Compliance Programs 

Construction Record keeping and 

Reporting Requirements. 

OMB Control Number: 1250–0001. 

Affected Public: Private Sector— 

businesses or other for-profits and notfor-profit institutions. 

Total Estimated Number of 

Respondents: 52,429. 

Total Estimated Number of 

Responses: 52,429. 

Total Estimated Annual Time Burden: 

803,725 hours. 

Total Estimated Annual Other Costs 

Burden: $83,131. 

Dated: December 16, 2014. 

Michel Smyth, 

Departmental Clearance Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2014–29830 Filed 12–19–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–CM–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–85,468] 

Comcast Cable Central Division 

Customer Care, Alpharetta, Georgia; 

Notice of Negative Determination 

Regarding Application for 

Reconsideration 

By application dated October 21, 

2014, workers requested administrative 

reconsideration of the Department of 

Labor’s negative determination 

regarding eligibility to apply for Trade 

Adjustment Assistance (TAA) 

applicable to workers and former 

workers of Comcast Cable, Central 

Division Customer Care, Alpharetta, 

Georgia (subject firm). The 

determination was issued on September 

22, 2014. The Department’s Notice of 

determination was published in the 

Federal Register on October 21, 2014 

(79 FR 62971). 

Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) 

reconsideration may be granted under 

the following circumstances: 

(1) If it appears on the basis of facts 

not previously considered that the 

determination complained of was 

erroneous; 

(2) If it appears that the determination 

complained of was based on a mistake 

in the determination of facts not 

previously considered; or 

(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying 

Officer, a misinterpretation of facts or of 

the law justified reconsideration of the 

decision. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES