alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  Exhibit 10.80

                       FIRST AMENDMENT TO LEASE SCHEDULE


          MASTER PROPERTY LEASE AGREEMENT NO. 963 DATED MARCH 29, 1996
                      SCHEDULE NO. 2 DATED MARCH 29, 1996



     The Initial Term of the Lease for the Units covered by the Schedule No. 2
to the Master Property Lease Agreement No. 963, dated March 29, 1996, is hereby
amended such that the original expiration date of the Lease Schedule, of October
31, 2001, shall now be NOVEMBER 30, 1999.

     The rent per month during the amended term, beginning December 1, 1997 and
continuing through November 30, 1999, shall be $63,566.40, plus applicable
taxes.

     The rental payments during the amended lease term shall be made monthly in
advance on the first day of each month, beginning on December 1, 1997.

     Section 6 of the Lease Schedule shall be replaced with the following new
Section 6:

     Provided that the Lease has not been terminated and that no Event of
Default or event which, with notice or lapse of time or both, would become an
Event of Default shall have occurred and be continuing, and provided that all
rents and other payments due under the Lease shall have been paid, title to the
Units covered by the schedule for Trade Fixtures/Tenant Improvements under the
Lease shall pass to Lessee at the end of the amended lease term.

     Except as specifically amended hereby, Schedule No. 2 shall be and remain
in full force and effect.

     This Amendment has been entered into, and is made a part of the above
referenced Schedule, as of October 29, 1997.

ARRIS PHARMACEUTICAL                    HAMBRECHT & QUIST
CORPORATION                             GUARANTY FINANCE, LLC

By: /s/ Frederick Ruegsegger            By: /s/ Donald M. Campbell
    ---------------------------             --------------------------
Name: Frederick Ruegsegger              Name: Donald M. Campbell
      -------------------------               ------------------------
Title: VP & CFO                         Title: Chief Executive Officer
       ------------------------                -----------------------



  First Amendment to Schedule No. 2 to Master Property Lease Agreement No. 963
**EXHIBIT 32.1****Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of S1 Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifiesthat, to his knowledge on the date hereof:(a) the Form 10-Q Report of the Company for the quarterlyperiod ended March 31, 2006 filed on the date hereof withthe Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (b) information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.         /s/ James S. Mahan, III   James S. Mahan, III   Chief Executive Officer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been providedto the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchangecommission or its staff upon request.May 8, 2006
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### United States Parole Commission

                    I, Isaac Fulwood, of the United States Parole Commission, was present at a                           ( print page 13662)                        meeting of said Commission, which started at approximately 10 a.m., on Thursday, February 17, 2011, at the U.S. Parole Commission, 5550 Friendship Boulevard, 4th Floor, Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss an original jurisdiction case pursuant to 28 CFR 2.17. Four Commissioners were present, constituting a quorum when the vote to close the meeting was submitted.                

Public announcement further describing the subject matter of the meeting and certifications of the General Counsel that this meeting may be closed by votes of the Commissioners present were submitted to the Commissioners prior to the conduct of any other business. Upon motion duly made, seconded, and carried, the following Commissioners voted that the meeting be closed: Isaac Fulwood, Cranston J. Mitchell, Patricia Cushwa and J. Patricia Wilson Smoot.

*In witness whereof,*                     I make this official record of the vote taken to close this meeting and authorize this record to be made available to the public.                

 Dated: February 18, 2011.

Isaac Fulwood,

Chairman, U.S. Parole Commission.

[FR Doc. 2011-5590 Filed 3-11-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-31-M
### §1461. Effect upon State law

It is hereby declared that it is the express intent of Congress to supersede any and all laws of the States or political subdivisions thereof insofar as they may now or hereafter provide for the labeling of the net quantity of contents of the package of any consumer commodity covered by this chapter which are less stringent than or require information different from the requirements of section 1453 of this title or regulations promulgated pursuant thereto.

(Pub. L. 89–755, §12, Nov. 3, 1966, 80 Stat. 1302.)
# C_2007095EN.01005701.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/57

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 15 March 2007 — Sanchez Ferriz v Commission

(Case F-111/05) (1)

1

(Officials - Appraisal - Career development report - 2001-2002 appraisal procedure)

(2007/C 95/113)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Carlos Sanchez Ferriz (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: F. Frabetti, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and H. Kraemer, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Application for annulment of the applicant's career development report for the period 2001-2002

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | dismisses the application; |
| --- | --- |

1.

dismisses the application;

| 2. | orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 48, 25.2.2006, p. 36 (case initially registered before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities under number T-413/05 and transferred to the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union by order of 15.12.2005).

1

---
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2004 of Financial Security Assurance Holdings Ltd. (the "Company"), as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph W. Simon, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  | By: | /s/JOSEPH W. SIMONChief Financial Officer
March 30, 2005
| |  | --- | --------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

---
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 47 (Thursday, March 10, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 13121]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5421]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

49 CFR Parts 385, 390, and 395

[Docket No. FMCSA-2010-0167]
RIN 2126-AB20


Electronic On-Board Recorders and Hours of Service Supporting 
Documents

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM); extension of comment 
period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice extends the public comment period for the NPRM 
from April 4, 2011 to May 23, 2011.

DATES: Comments on the NPRM are due by May 23, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Deborah M. Freund, Vehicle and 
Roadside Operations Division, Office of Bus and Truck Standards and 
Operations, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 1200 New 
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001 or by telephone at (202) 
366-5370.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On February 17, 2011, the Commercial Vehicle 
Safety Alliance requested that FMCSA extend the comment period for the 
Electronic On-Board Recorder and Hours of Service Supporting Documents 
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, which published on February 1, 2011 (76 
FR 5537), by 45 days. On March 1, 2011, the American Trucking 
Associations also requested a 45-day extension to the comment period.
    FMCSA believes that other potential commenters to this rulemaking 
will benefit from an extension as well. Accordingly, FMCSA extends the 
comment period for all comments on the NPRM and its related documents 
to May 23, 2011.

    Issued on: March 4, 2011.
Anne S. Ferro,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2011-5421 Filed 3-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P
### **CHAPTER 56A—GLOBAL CHANGE RESEARCH**

Sec.
2921.
Definitions.

#### SUBCHAPTER I—UNITED STATES GLOBAL CHANGE RESEARCH PROGRAM

2931.
Findings and purpose.
2932.
Committee on Earth and Environmental Sciences.
2933.
United States Global Change Research Program.
2934.
National Global Change Research Plan.
2935.
Budget coordination.
2936.
Scientific assessment.
2937.
Omitted.
2938.
Relation to other authorities.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION IN GLOBAL CHANGE RESEARCH

2951.
Findings and purposes.
2952.
International discussions.
2953.
Global Change Research Information Office.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—GROWTH DECISION AID

2961.
Study and decision aid.
Exhibit 32.2
 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ ROBERT GIAMBRONERobert Giambrone

Chief Financial Officer
 *
    
    The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as
a separate disclosure document.
| 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      as of and for the period covered by theReport. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  June      22, 2010 | /s/ Paul J. Milano                              |   |
|-------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                | Name:      Paul J. Milano                       |   |
|                                | Title:        Chief Financial Officer |   |

----
# C_2010195EN.01003001.xml

| 17.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 195/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 195/30

---

Action brought on 20 May 2010 — Nike International Ltd v OHIM — Intermar Simanto Nahmias (JUMPMAN)

(Case T-233/10)

2010/C 195/47

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Nike International Ltd (Beaverton, USA) (represented by: M. De Justo Bailey, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Intermar Simanto Nahmias (Individual Company) (Istanbul, Turkey)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 11 March 2010 in case R 738/2009-1, as far as the opposition decision No B 1326299 has been upheld for all the contested goods; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 11 March 2010 in case R 738/2009-1, as far as the opposition decision No B 1326299 has been upheld for all the contested goods;

| — | Order the defendant to bear the costs of the proceedings; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to bear the costs of the proceedings; and

| — | Order the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs of the proceedings, should it become an intervening party in this case. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs of the proceedings, should it become an intervening party in this case.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘JUMPMAN’, for goods in class 25

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited: Spanish trade mark registration No 2657489 of the word mark ‘JUMP’, for goods in class 25; Community trade mark registration No 2752145 of the word mark ‘JUMP’, for goods in class 25

Mark or sign cited:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition for all of the contested goods and rejected the application in its entirety

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal wrongly assessed that there was a likelihood of confusion between the concerned trade marks.

Pleas in law:

---
C 

2018 Reinsurance Data 

National Totals By Fund 

As of 10/2022 

Fund Gross Liability Gross Premium Gross Indemnity Retained Liability * 

A 12,502,325,522 1,733,388,914 2,299,361,218 2,337,934,870 

98,038,720,576 8,171,733,497 4,811,300,743 91,597,741,513 

Total 110,541,046,098 9,905,122,411 7,110,661,961 93,935,676,383 

Footnotes: * Includes 6.5% Net Book Quota Share. 

Retained Premium * Retaine

324,143,735 

7,622,869,720 7,947,013,455 

Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1



Section 1350 Certification

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of MK Resources Company (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, G. Frank Joklik, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ G. Frank Joklik                              
|G. Frank Joklik                                  
|Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|May 16, 2005
#### § 590.422 Condemnation.

Eggs and egg products found to be adulterated at official plants shall be condemned and, if no appeal be taken from such determination of condemnation, such articles shall be destroyed for human food purposes under the supervision of an inspector: *Provided,* That articles which may by reprocessing be made not adulterated need not be condemned and destroyed if so reprocessed under the supervision of an inspector and thereafter found to be not adulterated. If an appeal is requested, the eggs or egg products shall be appropriately marked and segregated pending completion of an appeal inspection.

[36 FR 9814, May 28, 1971, as amended at 85 FR 68679, Oct. 29, 2020]
### §5541. Definitions

In this subchapter:

#### (1) Department

The term "Department" means the Department of Energy.

#### (2) Exascale computing

The term "exascale computing" means computing through the use of a computing machine that performs near or above 10 to the 18th power operations per second.

#### (3) High-end computing system

The term "high-end computing system" means a computing system with performance that substantially exceeds that of systems that are commonly available for advanced scientific and engineering applications.

#### (4) Leadership System

The term "Leadership System" means a high-end computing system that is among the most advanced in the world in terms of performance in solving scientific and engineering problems.

#### (5) Institution of higher education

The term "institution of higher education" has the meaning given the term in section 1001(a) of title 20.

#### (6) Secretary

The term "Secretary" means the Secretary of Energy.

(Pub. L. 108–423, §2, Nov. 30, 2004, 118 Stat. 2400; Pub. L. 115–246, title III, §304(b)(2), formerly §304(a)(2), Sept. 28, 2018, 132 Stat. 3145, renumbered §304(b)(2), Pub. L. 117–167, div. B, title I, §10104(a)(1), Aug. 9, 2022, 136 Stat. 1433.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subchapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 108–423, Nov. 30, 2004, 118 Stat. 2400, which is classified principally to this subchapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 5501 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

This section was enacted as part of the American Super Computing Leadership Act of 2017 which comprises this subchapter, and not as part of the High-Performance Computing Act of 1991 which comprises this chapter.

#### Amendments

2018—Pars. (1) to (5). Pub. L. 115–246, §304(b)(2)(A), (B), formerly §304(a)(2)(A), (B), as renumbered by Pub. L. 117–167, added pars. (1) and (2), redesignated former pars. (2) to (4) as (3) to (5), respectively, and struck out former par. (1) which defined "Center". Former par. (5) redesignated (6).

Par. (6). Pub. L. 115–246, §304(b)(2)(A), (C), formerly §304(a)(2)(A), (C), as renumbered by Pub. L. 117–167, redesignated par. (5) as (6) and struck out ", acting through the Director of the Office of Science of the Department of Energy" before period at end.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

This subchapter known as the "American Super Computing Leadership Act of 2017", see Short Title note set out under section 5501 of this title.
### §3602. Conversion lending

It is the sense of the Congress that lending by federally insured lending institutions for the conversion of rental housing to condominiums and cooperative housing should be discouraged where there are adverse impacts on housing opportunities of the low- and moderate-income and elderly and handicapped tenants involved.

(Pub. L. 96–399, title VI, §603, Oct. 8, 1980, 94 Stat. 1673.)
#### § 3.59 [Reserved]
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Seeks Applications for Projects that Support Strategic Economic and Community 

Development Across Jurisdictions

WASHINGTON, May 10, 2018 – Assistant to the Secretary for Rural Development Anne Hazlett today 

announced that USDA is seeking applications for projects that support multi-jurisdictional plans under the

Strategic Economic and Community Development (SECD) program.

Section 6025 of the Agricultural Act of 2014 provides the Secretary of Agriculture the authority to give 

priority to projects that support strategic economic or community development plans that serve two or more 

jurisdictions. The priority points can be awarded for applications in Community Facilities programs, the Rural 

Business Development Grant Program, the Business & Industry Loan Guarantee Program and in USDA Water 

and Environmental programs.

To apply for SECD priority points, applicants must submit Form RD 1980-88, "Strategic Economic and 

Community Development (section 6025) Priority" by Sept. 30, 2018, or by the application deadline for the 

underlying program, whichever comes first. That form should be sent to the USDA Rural Development Area

Office servicing the area where the project is located. For a list of area offices, visit the state office website. See 

page 21762 of the May 10 Federal Register for additional information.

Applicants must meet the eligibility requirements of the underlying USDA program. Consideration for 

regional development priority is based on (1) how well the project supports a multi-jurisdictional plan, and (2) 

how well the plan addresses collaboration and investments from other federal and philanthropic agencies.

USDA encourages applications that will support recommendations made in the report to the President from 

the Task Force on Agriculture and Rural Prosperity to help improve life in rural America. Applicants are 

encouraged to consider projects that provide measurable results in helping rural communities build robust and 

sustainable economies through strategic investments in infrastructure, partnerships and innovation. Key 

strategies include:

• Achieving e-Connectivity for Rural America

• Developing the Rural Economy

• Harnessing Technological Innovation

• Supporting a Rural Workforce

• Improving Quality of Life

#