alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #12459 and #12460]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 1.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of California dated 02/02/2011.

*Incident:*                         Severe Winter Storms, Flooding, and Debris and Mud Flows.                    

*Incident Period:*                         12/17/2010 through 01/04/2011.                    

*Effective Date:*                         02/18/2011.                    

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         04/04/2011.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         11/02/2011.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small  Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925  Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of an Administrative declaration for the State of California, dated 02/02/2011 is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

*Primary Counties:*                     San Diego.                

*Contiguous Counties:*

California: Imperial.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Dated: February 18, 2011.

Karen G. Mills,

Administrator.

[FR Doc. 2011-4429 Filed 2-28-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
### §913. Turnkey selection procedures

(a) Authority to Use.—The Secretary may use one-step turnkey selection procedures for the purpose of entering into contracts for construction projects.

(b) Definitions.—In this section, the following definitions apply:

(1) The term "one-step turnkey selection procedures" means procedures used for the selection of a contractor on the basis of price and other evaluation criteria to perform, in accordance with the provisions of a firm fixed-price contract, both the design and construction of a facility using performance specifications supplied by the Secretary.

(2) The term "construction" includes the construction, procurement, development, conversion, or extension of any facility.

(3) The term "facility" means a building, structure, or other improvement to real property.

(Added Pub. L. 109–241, title II, §205(a), July 11, 2006, 120 Stat. 521, §677; renumbered §913, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §107(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4205.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 677 of this title as this section.
### §181. Population

(a) During the intervals between each census of population required under section 141 of this title, the Secretary, to the extent feasible, shall annually produce and publish for each State, county, and local unit of general purpose government which has a population of fifty thousand or more, current data on total population and population characteristics and, to the extent feasible, shall biennially produce and publish for other local units of general purpose government current data on total population. Such data shall be produced and published for each State, county, and other local unit of general purpose government for which data is compiled in the most recent census of population taken under section 141 of this title. Such data may be produced by means of sampling or other methods, which the Secretary determines will produce current, comprehensive, and reliable data.

(b) If the Secretary is unable to produce and publish current data during any fiscal year on total population for any county and local unit of general purpose government as required by this section, a report shall be submitted by the Secretary to the President of the Senate and to the Speaker of the House of Representatives not later than 90 days before the commencement of the following fiscal year, enumerating each government excluded and giving the reasons for such exclusion.

(Added Pub. L. 94–521, §8(a), Oct. 17, 1976, 90 Stat. 2462.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

A prior section 181, act Aug. 31, 1954, ch. 1158, 68 Stat. 1021, authorizing the Secretary to conduct surveys necessary to furnish current data on subjects covered by the censuses under this title, was repealed by section 8(a) of Pub. L. 94–521. See section 182 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 17, 1976, see section 17 of Pub. L. 94–521, set out as a note under section 1 of this title.
### §278o. User fees

The Institute shall not implement a policy of charging fees with respect to the use of Institute research facilities by research associates in the absence of express statutory authority to charge such fees.

(Mar. 3, 1901, ch. 872, §30, as added Pub. L. 100–418, title V, §5161, Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1450.)
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1409

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce from 24 months

to 12 months the holding period used to determine whether horses

are assets described in section 1231 of such Code.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 21, 1999

Mr. MCCONNELL (for himself and Mr. BUNNING) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce

from 24 months to 12 months the holding period used

to determine whether horses are assets described in section 1231 of such Code.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. HOLDING PERIOD REDUCED TO 12 MONTHS

4 FOR PURPOSES OF DETERMINING WHETHER

5 HORSES ARE SECTION 1231 ASSETS.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (A) of section

7 1231(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating
2

•S 1409 IS

1 to definition of property used in the trade or business)

2 is amended by striking ‘‘and horses’’.

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

4 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

5 December 31, 1999.

Æ
### §2471. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out the purposes of this chapter, not to exceed $6,250,000 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1976, and the subsequent transition period ending September 30, 1976; not to exceed $5,000,000 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1977; and not to exceed $5,000,000 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 1978. Funds appropriated for any fiscal year shall remain available for obligation until expended.

(Pub. L. 94–136, title VII, §701, Nov. 28, 1975, 89 Stat. 743.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>   5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS OF ASANTE TECHNOLOGIES,  INC. AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>

<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              OCT-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-02-1999
<CASH>                                               4,808
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       10,185
<ALLOWANCES>                                         5,771
<INVENTORY>                                          2,663
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    12,414
<PP&E>                                               7,726
<DEPRECIATION>                                       7,013
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      13,345
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               11,663
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            26,765
<OTHER-SE>                                         (25,083)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        13,345
<SALES>                                             37,488
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    37,488
<CGS>                                               32,557
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       32,557
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    18,794
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (14,161)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (14,161)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (14,161)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (1.53)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (1.53)



</TABLE>
ex10-2.htm


    EXHIBIT 10.2


      


       

      


       

       AMENDMENT TO THE IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED

       

      2006
SENIOR EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE PROGRAM

       

      1.    Section 1
of the Iron Mountain Incorporated 2006 Senior Executive
Incentive Program (the "2006 SEIP") is hereby deleted in its entirety and
replaced with the following:

       

      "1.    
Participant.
    The sole participant in this Program shall be Robert T.
Brennan, the Chief Executive Officer of Iron Mountain Incorporated (the
"Corporation").

       

      2.    Section 2
of the 2006 SEIP is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the
following:

       

      "2.    
Annual Limit on
Incentive Compensation.     The maximum amount
payable under this Program with respect to a fiscal year shall be the lesser of
1.25 times Mr. Brennan's annual base compensation for the fiscal year or
$1,500,000.00 (the "Annual Limit")."

       

      3.    Section 3
of the 2006 SEIP is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the
following:

       

      "3.    
Eligibility for
Incentive Compensation.     While the outcome for the
Corporation's fiscal year to which the incentive compensation relates is
substantially uncertain (but not more than 90 days after the start of that
fiscal year), the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors shall
establish the criteria for the payment of the Annual Limit. Such criteria may be
based on any one or more of the following business criteria: EBITDA; OIBDA;
contribution; gross revenues; growth rate; capital spending; return on invested
capital; free cash flow; operating income; attaining budget; and achievement of
stated corporate goals including, but not limited to acquisitions, alliances,
joint ventures, international development and internal expansion. Any such
criteria shall be adjusted as necessary to reflect acquisitions. If such
objectives are not fully achieved, the Compensation Committee may provide that
less than 100 percent of the Annual Limit shall be payable.

       

      Following the
close of the fiscal year, the Compensation Committee shall certify whether such
criteria were satisfied."

       

      4.    These
amendments will be effective for fiscal years beginning on or after
January 1, 2009; provided, however, that prior to effectiveness these
amendments must first be approved by an affirmative vote of a majority of the
votes properly cast at a duly held meeting of the stockholders of the Company at
which a quorum representing a majority of all outstanding common stock is
present, in person or by proxy. Except as hereinabove amended, the provisions of
the 2006 SEIP shall remain in full force and effect.
# C_2010234EN.01002202.xml

| 28.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/22

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Belgium) lodged on 31 May 2010 — Vereniging van Educatieve en Wetenschappelijke Auteurs (VEWA) v Belgische Staat

(Case C-271/10)

()

2010/C 234/36

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Raad van State van België

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Vereniging van Educatieve en Wetenschappelijke Auteurs (VEWA)

Applicant:

Defendant: Belgische Staat

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Does Article 5(1) of Council Directive 92/100/EEC (1) of 19 November 1992 on rental right and lending right and on certain rights related to copyright in the field of intellectual property, now Article 6(1) of Directive 2006/115/EC (2) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on rental right and lending right and on certain rights related to copyright in the field of intellectual property, according to which at least authors should obtain a remuneration for public lending, preclude a national provision which sets the remuneration at a flat rate of EUR 1 per adult per year and of EUR 0,5 per minor per year?

1

2

---

(1)  OJ 1992 L 346, p. 61.

1

(2)  OJ 2006 L 376, p. 28.

2

---
SUMMARY OF CHANGES FOR THE BARLEY PRICING METHODOLOGY (23-CEPP-M0091)

(Released June 2022)

The following is a brief description of changes to the Barley Pricing Methodology for the 2022 and succeeding crop years.

Please refer to the Barley Pricing Methodology document below for complete information.

• The document was reformatted to be more consistent with other policy documents. 
(1 of 1)

23-CEPP-M0091

(Released June 2022)

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Federal Crop Insurance Corporation

Barley Pricing Methodology

In accordance with the Common Crop Insurance Policy Basic Provisions and the Commodity Exchange Price Provisions: Section 

II – Barley (CEPP), barley prices are derived using factors “determined by RMA.” The methods used to determine these factors 

are explained in this document. 

Feed Barley, All States and Counties except Alaska

A 10-year simple average of yearly data is used as the 

factor methodology for barley. The factor is the same for all 

sales closing dates. Two price series are used to establish 

the relative values of barley and corn. The first is the 

National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) marketing 

year average price for feed barley for the entire U.S. The 

second is average CBOT September corn contract prices 

from August 1 to August 31. This timeframe represents the 

most common harvest period for barley in the CEPP, as well 

as the most common for the major barley producing states. 

For each year, the NASS price is divided by the CBOT price 

to derive a ratio, and then the most recent 10 years of ratios 

are averaged to generate the factor. 

Feed Barley, Alaska only

A 5-year simple average of yearly data is used as the factor 

methodology for Alaska barley. Two price series are used 

to establish the relative values of Alaska barley and corn. 

The first is the NASS marketing year average price for 

Alaska barley. The second is average CBOT September 

corn contract prices from August 1 to August 31. For each 

year, the NASS price is divided by the CBOT price to derive 

a ratio, and then the most recent 5 years of ratios are 

averaged to generate the factor. 

For all states

The factors computed above use data from two years prior

to the crop year it applies to. For example, for the 2022 CY,

the factors are calculated with data from 2011 – 2020.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Rural Utilities Service

RUS BULLETIN 1780-8 

RD-GD-2020-104

SUBJECT: Minimum Suggested Contents of Management Agreements

TO: RUS Water and Environmental Programs Staff.

EFFECTIVE DATE: Date of approval.

OFFICE OF PRIMARY INTEREST: Water and Environmental Programs. 

AVAILABILITY: This Bulletin is available on the Internet at 

http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/RDU_Bulletins_Water_and_Environmental.html 

PURPOSE: To outline the minimum suggested contents of management 

agreements.

DISCLAIMER: The contents of this guidance document does not have the force and effect of law and 

is not meant to bind the public in any way. This document is intended only to provide clarity to the 

public regarding existing requirements under the law or agency policies.
RUS Bulletin 1780-8 

Minimum Suggested 

Contents of Management Agreements

1. Manage and operate the project subject to the operating and employment procedures

adopted by the owner.

2. Operate facility based on the annual budget and fee schedule adopted by the owner.

3. Set out the handling of funds. All reserve, depreciation, debt payment, and surplus funds

should be transferred to the owner on at least a monthly basis.

4. Provide for monthly and annual reports to the owner covering appropriate financial and

operational statistics and inspection of books and records by owner and government.

5. Set out the responsibilities for maintenance.

6. Set out the amount and type of insurance, including fidelity bond or employee dishonesty

bonds.

7. Provide for reasonable limits on expenditures for emergency repairs to the facility.

8. Set out the term of the agreement and compensation of the manager including specific

positions included in that fee.

9. Set out the remedies for default of the agreement.

10. Require operation in accordance with all Federal, State and local government

requirements.

11. Require the manager to comply with all requirements related to the Federal financial

assistance as if it were the recipient of the assistance.

12. Set out responsibilities for obtaining and maintaining all necessary licenses, certifications,

and accreditations as may be necessary to operate, maintain, or manage the project.

oOo
# C_2011030EN.01006902.xml

| 29.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/69 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/69

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 3 September 2010 — Hecq v Commission

(Case F-53/10)

()

2011/C 30/138

Language of the case: French

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---
# C_2010209EN.01004501.xml

| 31.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/45

---

Action brought on 24 May 2010 — Scatizza v OHIM — Jacinto (HORSE COUTURE)

(Case T-238/10)

()

2010/C 209/69

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Stephanie Scatizza (Lugano, Switzerland) (represented by: P. Perani and P. Pozzi, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Manuel Jacinto, Lda (S. Paio de Oleiros, Portugal)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office For Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 5 March 2010 in case R 723/2009-2; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office For Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 5 March 2010 in case R 723/2009-2;

| — | Order the defendant to bear the costs of the proceedings; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to bear the costs of the proceedings; and

| — | Order the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs of the proceedings, should it become an intervening party in this case. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs of the proceedings, should it become an intervening party in this case.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘HORSE COUTURE’, for goods in class 18 — Community trade mark application No 6030399

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited: Portuguese trade mark registration No 379879 of the figurative mark ‘HORSE’, for goods in class 18

Mark or sign cited:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition partially

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal wrongly assessed that there was a likelihood of confusion between the concerned trade marks.

Pleas in law:

---
§ 111.31 Does this subpart replace subpart A of this part for violations of the reporting requirements of 52 U.S.C. 30104(a)? ( a ) No; §§ 111.1 through 111.8 and 111.20 through 111.24 shall apply to all compliance matters. This subpart will apply, rather than §§ 111.9 through 111.19, when the Commission, on the basis of information ascertained by the Commission in the normal course of carrying out its supervisory responsibilities, and when appropriate, determines that the compliance matter should be subject to this subpart. If the Commission determines that the violation should not be subject to this subpart, then the violation will be subject to all sections of subpart A of this part.
( b ) Subpart B will apply to compliance matters resulting from a complaint filed pursuant to 11 CFR 111.4 through 111.7 if the complaint alleges a violation of 52 U.S.C. 30104(a). If the complaint alleges violations of any other provision of any statute or regulation over which the Commission has jurisdiction, subpart A will apply to the alleged violations of these other provisions.
[65 FR 31794, May 19, 2000, as amended at 79 FR 77848, Dec. 29, 2014]