alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Stanley D. Piekos, certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q ofAugust Technology Corporation;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifying officers and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:

 

a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date:  November 1, 2004 | By:                      | /s/  STANLEY D. PIEKOS |   |
|-------------------------|--------------------------|------------------------|--------|
|                    | Stanley D. Piekos        |                   |
|                    | Chief Financial  Officer |                   |
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2013-0307 Directorate ID: 2012-SW-079-AD

Helicopter Model: Eurocopter France Model AS332C, AS332L, AS332L1, AS332L2, and 

EC225LP Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 6 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions of this AD are intended to prevent failure of the main gearbox and 

subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

Costs:

Labor per Helicopter

(1 work-hour x $85/workhour for the records 

review)

(14 work-hour x $85/workhour for the “CHIP” 

modification)

(2 work-hour x $85/workhour for the inspection)

$85

$1,190

$170 per inspection cycle

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Rao Edupuganti
### §234. Standard barrel for fruits or other dry commodity

The standard barrel for fruits, vegetables, and other dry commodities other than cranberries shall be of the following dimensions when measured without distention of its parts: Length of stave, twenty-eight and one-half inches; diameter of heads, seventeen and one-eighth inches; distance between heads, twenty-six inches; circumference of bulge, sixty-four inches, outside measurement; and the thickness of staves not greater than four-tenths of an inch: Provided, That any barrel of a different form having a capacity of seven thousand and fifty-six cubic inches shall be a standard barrel. The standard barrel for cranberries shall be of the following dimensions when measured without distention of its parts: Length of staves, twenty-eight and one-half inches; diameter of head, sixteen and one-fourth inches; distance between heads, twenty-five and one-fourth inches; circumference of bulge, fifty-eight and one-half inches, outside measurement; and the thickness of staves not greater than four-tenths of an inch.

(Mar. 4, 1915, ch. 158, §1, 38 Stat. 1186.)
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 04524

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

04524\04524_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 04524\04524_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04524\04524_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04524\04524_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04524\04524_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04524\04524_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04524\04524_PartF.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04524\04524_PartG.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04524\04524_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

04524\Certification Statement Plant ID 04524.pdf Plant certification statement

x 04524\Plant Contact\Re Steam Electric Questionnaire Follow-Up.doc Email communications regarding questions on the survey response.

x 04524\Plant Contact\SEEG ICR JR Whiting Answers to EPA Follow Up Questions to 2-28-2011 Final to ERG.xlsx Email communications regarding questions on the survey response.

04524\Supplemental Documents\04524_JR Whiting_SEEG ICR Transmittal Letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 04524\Supplemental Documents\04524_JRW_Part A_Section 5_A5-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 04524\Supplemental Documents\04524_JRW_Part A_Section 5_A5-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 04524\Supplemental Documents\04524_JRW_Part D_Section 3.1_D3-POND-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 04524\04524_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

04524\04524_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
#### § 115.167 Agency protection against retaliation.

Agency employees shall not retaliate against any person, including a detainee, who reports, complains about, or participates in an investigation into an allegation of sexual abuse, or for participating in sexual activity as a result of force, coercion, threats, or fear of force.
<PAGE>
                                                                EXHIBIT 20(b)

                    ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE


                          Officer's Certificate
                          ---------------------

     I, George E. Borst, Senior Vice President and General Manager of Toyota
Motor Credit Corporation ("TMCC"), hereby certify as follows:

     (a)  a review of the activities of TMCC as Servicer under the 1998-C SUBI
Servicing Supplement (the "Agreement") dated December 1, 1998 among TMTT, Inc.,
as Titling Trustee, TMCC, as Servicer, and U.S. Bank National Association, as
Trust Agent, for the period from November 1, 1998 through September 30, 1999,
and of the performance of the Servicer under the Agreement has been made under
my supervision;

     (b)  to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, no default has
occurred by the Servicer under the Agreement throughout such period; and

     (c)  throughout such period the Servicer has maintained in full force and
effect the Contingent and Excess Liability Insurance Policies required pursuant
to Section 4.12 of the Agreement.



Date:  December 23, 1999                         /S/ GEORGE E. BORST
                                        ------------------------------------
                                                     George E. Borst
                                                  Senior Vice President
                                                   and General Manager
                                               (Principal Executive Officer)
# C_2010179EN.01005602.xml

| 3.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/56 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/56

---

Action brought on 18 May 2010 — Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria v Commission

(Case T-225/10)

(2010/C 179/96)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, SA (Bilbao, Spain) (represented by: J. Buendía Sierra, E. Abad Valdenebro, M. Muñoz de Juan and R. Calvo Salinero, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

| — | Annulment of Article 1(1) of the contested decision in so far as it states that Article 12(5) TRLIS (Amended Law on Corporation Tax) contains elements of State aid; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annulment of Article 1(1) of the contested decision in so far as it states that Article 12(5) TRLIS (Amended Law on Corporation Tax) contains elements of State aid;

| — | In the alternative, annulment of Article 1(1) of the contested decision in so far as it states that Article 12(5) TRLIS contains elements of State aid where it applies to share acquisitions which result in acquisition of control; and |
| --- | --- |

—

In the alternative, annulment of Article 1(1) of the contested decision in so far as it states that Article 12(5) TRLIS contains elements of State aid where it applies to share acquisitions which result in acquisition of control; and

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The decision against which the present action is brought is the same as that contested in Cases T-219/10 Autogrill España v Commission and T-221/10 Iberdrola v Commission.

The pleas and main arguments are similar to those relied on in the context of those cases.

They allege, in essence, errors of law both in the legal classification of the measure as State aid and in identifying the beneficiaries of that measure.

---
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00347

- CV

NRG AND ASSOCIATES, L.L.C. APPELLANT

V.

MOYER GRAIN, INC. APPELLEE

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 2013

- 005209

- 1

------- -----



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

------------

On January 6, 2015 and January 20, 2015 , we notified appellant that the

trial court clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the

court that payment arrangements had not been ma de to pay for the clerk’s record

as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a)(2). See Tex. R. App.

P. 35.3(a)(2). We stated that we would dismiss the appeal for want of

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47. 4.2

prosecution unless appellant, within ten days, made arrangements to pay f or the

clerk’s record and provided this court with proof of payment.

Because appellant has not made payment arrangements for the clerk’s

record, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal should be dismissed for want

of prosecution. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.

37.3(b), 42.3(b).

Appellant shall pay all costs of the appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED: February 12 , 2015
§ 325.16 Official seals; forms, use, and breaking. ( a ) The official seals required by this part shall be those prescribed in § 312.5(a) of this subchapter.
( b ) Except as provided in § 325.18(b), official seal affixed under this part shall be affixed or broken only by Program employees, and no person other than a Program employee shall affix, detach, break, change, or tamper with any such seal in any way whatever. Commission of any such acts contrary to this regulation is a criminal offense.
### §31. Repealed. Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title IV, §14102(a), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1921

Section, act Aug. 24, 1912, ch. 390, §11, 37 Stat. 567, related to closure of Panama Canal to violators of antitrust laws.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Nov. 2, 2002, and applicable only with respect to cases commenced on or after Nov. 2, 2002, see section 14103 of Pub. L. 107–273, set out as a note under section 3 of this title.
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-63699, No. 333-67535, No. 333-89551, No. 333-89505, No. 333-35996 and No. 333-125881) and Form S-3 (No. 333-100701, No. 333-60877 and No. 333-30497) of C&F Financial
Corporation and Subsidiary of our report, dated February 20, 2007, relating to the audits of the consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, included in and incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of C&F Financial Corporation and Subsidiary for the year ended December 31, 2006.



|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/Yount, Hyde & Barbour, P.C.

Winchester, Virginia

March 7, 2007
Editorial Note on Part 12
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 12 appear at 69 FR 32438, June 10, 2004.

§ 12.37 Comprehensive assessment. A comprehensive assessment must include: ( a ) *Review of prior reports and analyses of record.* The independent consultant team must review and consider all relevant reports on the safety of the development made by or written under the direction of Federal or state agencies, submitted under Commission regulations, or made by other consultants. The licensee must provide to the independent consultant team all information, reports, and analyses of record necessary to fulfill the requirements of this section. ( 1 ) In addition to the requirements of § 12.35(a), the independent consultant team must have a full understanding of the risk associated with the project works.
( 2 ) The independent consultant team shall perform a detailed review of the as-built drawings; monitoring data; and the methods, assumptions, calculations, results, and conclusions of the analyses of record pertaining to: ( i ) Geology and seismicity;
( ii ) Hydrology and hydraulics;
( iii ) Stability and structural integrity of project works; and
( iv ) Any other analyses relevant to the safety, stability, and operation of project works.
( b ) *Physical field inspection.* The independent consultant team must perform a physical field inspection that complies with § 12.35(b).
( c ) *Review of surveillance and monitoring plan and data.* The independent consultant team must perform a review of surveillance and monitoring plan and data that complies with § 12.35(c).
( d ) *Review of dam and public safety programs.* The independent consultant team must perform a review of dam and public safety programs that complies with § 12.35(d).
( e ) *Supporting Technical Information Document.* The comprehensive assessment shall include a review of the Supporting Technical Information Document.
( f ) *Potential failure mode analysis.* The comprehensive assessment shall include a potential failure mode analysis.
( g ) *Risk analysis.* The comprehensive assessment shall include a risk analysis. The Regional Engineer may, for good cause shown, grant a waiver of the requirement to complete a risk analysis. Any petition for waiver under this paragraph must be filed in accordance with § 385.207 of this chapter.
§ 98.32 Inspection of certain aircraft and other means of conveyance and shipping containers thereon; unloading, cleaning, and disinfection requirements. ( a ) *Inspection:* All aircraft and other means of conveyance (including shipping containers thereon) moving into the United States from any foreign region are subject to inspection without a warrant by properly identified and designated inspectors to determine whether they are carrying any animal, carcass, product or article regulated or subject to disposal under any law or regulation administered by the Secretary of Agriculture for prevention of the introduction or dissemination of any communicable animal disease.
( b ) *Unloading requirements:* Whenever in the course of any such inspection at any port in the United States the inspector has reason to believe that the means of conveyance or container is contaminated with material of animal (including poultry) origin, such as, but not limited to, meat, organs, glands, extracts, secretions, fat, bones, blood, lymph, urine, or manure, so as to present a danger of the spread of any communicable animal disease, the inspector may require the unloading of the means of conveyance and the emptying of the container if he or she deems it necessary to enable him or her to determine whether the means of conveyance or container is in fact so contaminated. The principal operator of the means of conveyance and his or her agent in charge of the means of conveyance shall comply with any such requirement under the immediate supervision of, and in the time and manner prescribed by, the inspector.
( c ) *Cleaning and disinfection:* Whenever, upon inspection under this section, an inspector determines that a means of conveyance or shipping container is contaminated with material of animal origin so as to present a danger of the spread of any communicable animal disease, he or she shall notify the principal operator of the means of conveyance or his or her agent in charge, of such determination and the requirements under this section. The person so notified shall cause the cleaning and disinfection of such means of conveyance and container under the immediate supervision of, and in the time and manner prescribed by, the inspector.
( d ) For purposes of this section, the term “shipping container” means any container of a type specially adapted for use in transporting any article on the means of conveyance involved.
[55 FR 31558, Aug. 2, 1990. Redesignated at 56 FR 55809, Oct. 30, 1991; 62 FR 56026, Oct. 28, 1997; 68 FR 6345, Feb. 7, 2003]
Exhibit 12.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Bruno Nieuwland, the Chief Financial Controller of Millicom International Cellular S.A., certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Millicom International Cellular S.A.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:



5.     The
company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's
auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
April 30, 2004

| |  | By: |  | /s/BRUNO NIEUWLAND
| |  | --- |  | ------------------
| |  |     |  | Name:             
| |  |     |  | Title:            

Exh 12.2-1

---



QuickLinks
2015 CROP YEAR

IRRIGATED RICE

YIELD EXCLUSION (YE)

Gulf of Mexico

Atlantic

Ocean

Pacific

Ocean

-130° -120° -110° -100° -90° -80° -70°

45° 40° 35° 30° 25°

Coordinate System: Albers

Central Meridian: 96°0'0"W

1st Std Parallel: 20°0'0"N

2nd Std Parallel: 60°0'0"N

Latitude of Origin: 40°0'0"N

Metadata:

County Files - US Census Tiger

Files 2013

YE Coverage - USDA - RMA

December 2014

0 125 250 500 750 1,000

Miles

STATEMENT

The Maps produced represent

the number of years (since 1995)

eligible for yield exclusion for

the 2015 crop year.

Document Path: K:\APH\Irrigated\Rice\IrrigatedRice.mxd

TABLE

Links directly to the state table

(double click)

Number of Years Eligible for

Yield Exclusion (YE)

0 years

1 year

2 to 4 years

5 to 7 years

8 to 10 years

11 to 15 years
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Increases Funding Limits for the Revolving Fund Program to Help Expand 

Access to Rural Water and Wastewater Infrastructure

WASHINGTON, March 17, 2021 – The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) today announced that it is 

increasing funding limits for loans financed under the Revolving Fund Program to support water and 

wastewater infrastructure projects in rural America. This improvement is in accordance with provisions in the 

Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018 (2018 Farm Bill).

In a final rule published today, USDA increased to $200,000 the maximum loan amount in the Revolving Fund 

Program. The previous loan limit was $100,000. This change will help expand access to safe, reliable drinking 

water, and sanitary sewage treatment for households in rural communities.

The Revolving Fund Program helps qualified nonprofit organizations create revolving loan funds to extend and 

improve water and waste disposal systems in rural areas. The funds may be used for pre-development costs for 

water and wastewater treatment projects. Funds also may be used for small short-term capital improvement 

projects that are not part of regular operations and maintenance. Program recipients set the loan terms for the 

individual communities they serve. 

Additional information is available on page 14525 of the March 17, 2021, Federal Register.

If you’d like to subscribe to USDA Rural Development updates, visit our GovDelivery subscriber page.

###

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender.
# C_2011252EN.01005803.xml

| 27.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/58

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 12 July 2011 — Massez And Others v Court of Justice

(Case F-101/10) (1)

1

2011/C 252/132

Language of the case: French

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 30, 29.1.2011, p. 63.

1

---