alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §278n–2. Green manufacturing and construction

The Director shall carry out a green manufacturing and construction initiative—

(1) to develop accurate sustainability metrics and practices for use in manufacturing;

(2) to advance the development of standards, including high performance green building standards, and the creation of an information infrastructure to communicate sustainability information about suppliers; and

(3) to move buildings toward becoming high performance green buildings, including improving energy performance, service life, and indoor air quality of new and retrofitted buildings through validated measurement data.

(Pub. L. 111–358, title IV, §408, Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 4004.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2010, also known as the America Creating Opportunities to Meaningfully Promote Excellence in Technology, Education, and Science Reauthorization Act of 2010, and as part of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Authorization Act of 2010, and not as part of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Act which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definitions

For definitions of "Director" and "high performance green building" as used in this section, see section 409 of Pub. L. 111–358, set out as a note under section 278n–1 of this title.
# C_2010234EN.01004101.xml

| 28.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/41

---

Action brought on 8 June 2010 — Ax v Council

(Case T-259/10)

()

2010/C 234/75

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Thomas Ax (Neckargemünd, Germany) (represented by: J. Baumann, Rechtsanwalt)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul Council Regulation (EU) No 407/2010 of 11 May 2010 establishing a European financial stabilisation mechanism; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul Council Regulation (EU) No 407/2010 of 11 May 2010 establishing a European financial stabilisation mechanism;

| — | Order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant seeks the annulment of Regulation (EU) No 407/2010. (1)

1

The applicant argues, inter alia, that the aid released by the contested regulation would infringe the prohibition under Article 125 TFEU on undertaking liability for or assuming the commitments of other Member States.

Moreover, Regulation No 407/2010 is not covered by the enabling provision of Article 122 TFEU. The applicant argues that the Member States affected by speculative attacks have not been seriously threatened with severe difficulties within the meaning of that provision. Moreover, the difficulties arising as a result of the speculative attacks are not caused by exceptional occurrences beyond the control of the Member States concerned.

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EU) No 407/2010 of 11 May 2010 establishing a European financial stabilisation mechanism (OJ 2010 L 118, p. 1).

1

---
§ 1301.27 Requests for correction or amendment of record. ( a ) An individual may request amendment of records pertaining to him in a TVA system to the extent permitted by the Act in accordance with this section. A request for amendment shall: ( 1 ) Be in writing and signed by the individual seeking the amendment;
( 2 ) Name the TVA system in which the record is maintained;
( 3 ) Describe the item or items of information to be amended;
( 4 ) Describe the nature of the amendment requested; and
( 5 ) Give the reasons for the requested change.
( b ) Requests shall be made to the official designated in the paragraph headed “Contesting record procedures” in the TVA system notice for the TVA system concerned. Before considering a request, TVA may require proof of identity of the requester similar to that required under § 1301.24 to gain access to the record.
( c ) The individual requesting amendment has the responsibility of providing TVA with evidence of why his record should be amended, and must provide adequate evidence to TVA to justify his request.
( d ) The provisions of §§ 1301.21 to 1301.34 of this part do not permit the alteration of evidence presented or to be presented in the course of judicial or administrative proceedings; neither do they permit collateral attack on a prior judicial or administrative action, or provide a collateral remedy for a matter otherwise judicially or administratively cognizable.
[40 FR 45313, Oct. 1, 1975. Redesignated at 44 FR 30682, May 29, 1979, and amended at 53 FR 30253, Aug. 11, 1988. Redesignated and amended at 82 FR 51757, 51758, Nov. 8, 2017]
#### § 51.8 Disinfection of premises, conveyances, and materials.

All premises, including all structures, holding facilities, conveyances, and materials, contaminated because of occupation or use by brucellosis reactor or exposed animals shall be properly cleaned and disinfected with a disinfectant permitted by APHIS in accordance with recommendations of the APHIS or State representative within 15 days from the date reactors were removed from the premises, except that the appropriate Veterinarian in Charge may extend the time limit for disinfection to 30 days when request for such extension is received by him prior to the expiration date of the original 15-day period allowed, and when he determines that such extension will not adversely affect the Brucellosis Eradication Program; and except further, that the Administrator may, upon request in specific cases, extend the time limit beyond the 30-day period when unusual and unforeseen circumstances occur, such as but not limited to floods, storms, or other Acts of God, which are beyond the control of the owner, preventing or hindering the disinfection of premises, conveyances, and materials. Certain premises may be exempted from such cleaning and disinfecting requirements by approval of the appropriate Veterinarian in Charge on written recommendations by the APHIS or State representative or when a written report by the APHIS or State representative determines that there are no buildings, holding facilities, conveyances, or other materials on the premises that would require such cleaning and disinfection.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0047)

[42 FR 64336, Dec. 23, 1977. Redesignated at 46 FR 13674, Feb. 23, 1981, and 47 FR 53324, Nov. 26, 1982; 48 FR 57472, Dec. 30, 1983; 50 FR 11993, Mar. 27, 1985; 54 FR 32435, Aug. 8, 1989; 56 FR 18506, Apr. 23, 1991]
#### § 1313.111 Notice.

The agency shall make available to employees, applicants, participants, beneficiaries, and other interested persons such information regarding the provisions of this part and its applicability to the programs or activities conducted by the agency, and make such information available to them in such manner as the head of the agency finds necessary to apprise such persons of the protections against discrimination assured them by section 504 and this regulation.
### §1025. Printing of monthly publication by Joint Economic Committee entitled "Economic Indicators"; distribution

The Joint Economic Committee is authorized to issue a monthly publication entitled "Economic Indicators", and a sufficient quantity shall be printed to furnish one copy to each Member of Congress; the Secretary and the Sergeant at Arms of the Senate; the Clerk, Sergeant at Arms, and Chief Administrative Officer of the House of Representatives; two copies to the libraries of the Senate and House, and the Congressional Library; seven hundred copies to the Joint Economic Committee; and the required number of copies to the Superintendent of Documents for distribution to depository libraries; and the Superintendent of Documents is authorized to have copies printed for sale to the public.

(June 23, 1949, ch. 237, 63 Stat. 264; Pub. L. 104–186, title II, §217, Aug. 20, 1996, 110 Stat. 1747.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as a part of the Employment Act of 1946 which comprises this chapter.

"Joint Economic Committee" substituted in text for "Joint Committee on the Economic Report" to conform to act June 18, 1956, ch. 399, §2, 70 Stat. 290. See section 1024(a) of this title.

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–186 substituted "Chief Administrative Officer" for "Doorkeeper".
**Exhibit 32.1**








**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**


**as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**








The undersigned officers of Gables Residential Trust (the "Company") hereby certify in his respective capacity as an officer and to his knowledge that the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: March 16, 2005








/s/ Chris D. WheelerChris D. WheelerExecutive Chairman of the Board of Trustees





/s/ Marvin R. Banks, Jr.Marvin R. Banks, Jr.Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
```

[110th Congress Public Law 20]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ020.110]

[[Page 121 STAT. 86]]

Public Law 110-20
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To redesignate the Federal building located at 167 North Main Street in 
  Memphis, Tennessee, as the ``Clifford Davis and Odell Horton Federal 
            Building''. <<NOTE: May 2, 2007 -  [H.R. 753]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 167 North Main Street in Memphis, 
Tennessee, commonly known as the Clifford Davis Federal Building, shall 
be known and designated as the ``Clifford Davis and Odell Horton Federal 
Building''.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Clifford Davis and 
Odell Horton Federal Building''.

    Approved May 2, 2007.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 753:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 110-72 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007):
            Mar. 26, considered and passed House.
            Apr. 10, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
# C_2013026EN.01004002.xml

| 26.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/40

---

Judgment of the General Court of 6 December 2012 — Füller-Tomlinson v European Parliament

(Case T-390/10 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Public service - Members of the temporary staff - Social security - Occupational disease - Fixing of the proportion of invalidity attributable to occupational disease - Application of the European Guide for Assessment, for medical purposes, of Physical and Mental Impairments - Distortion of the facts - Reasonable time-limit)

2013/C 26/76

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Paulette Füller-Tomlinson (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Parliament (represented by: K. Zejdová and S. Seyr, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the European Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 1 July 2010 in Case F-97/08 Füller-Tomlinson v European Parliament [2010] ECR-SC I-A-1-0000 and II-A-1-0000 seeking to have that judgment set aside.

Füller-Tomlinson

European Parliament

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Paulette Füller-Tomlinson to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Parliament in the course of the present proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Paulette Füller-Tomlinson to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Parliament in the course of the present proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 301, 6.11.2010.

1

---
#### § 51.26 Record of tests.

An APHIS representative, State representative, or accredited veterinarian will compile, on an APHIS-approved form, a complete test record for each animal. The claimant must provide any information necessary to complete the form. The test record must include the type of test and the test results for each animal. It must also include the individual identification of each tested animal. Any unique, individually numbered identification is acceptable. The animal's owner and the appropriate State veterinarian's office will each receive a copy of the test record.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0185)
Exhibit 10.65   Loan Agreement between Barbara A. Caulfield
and Affymetrix, Inc.  As part of the
Employment Offer dated July 16, 2001, Affymetrix, Inc. agrees to loan Barbara
A. Caulfield $1,200,000.00 for a term of four years or to the date Barbara A.
Caulfield leaves Affymetrix, Inc., which ever comes first.  The loan term begins the day the loan is
disbursed.  The rate of interest is at
the IRS imputed interest rate on the first day of the term of the loan.  Barbara A.
Caulfield will begin paying accrued interest 2 years after the first day of the
term of the loan.   /s/ GREGORY T. SCHIFFMAN
  
  /s/ BARBARA A. CAULFIELDGregory T. Schiffman
  Barbara A. CaulfieldSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
  EVP & General CounselDate:  January 7, 2004
#### § 46.112 Review by institution

Research covered by this policy that has been approved by an IRB may be subject to further appropriate review and approval or disapproval by officials of the institution. However, those officials may not approve the research if it has not been approved by an IRB.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                             279,521
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       36,997
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                        416,735
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   739,368
<PP&E>                                           1,304,251
<DEPRECIATION>                                     416,467
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,657,662
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              571,368
<BONDS>                                            350,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                1,153
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             4,034
<OTHER-SE>                                         736,294
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,657,662
<SALES>                                          4,143,548
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,143,548
<CGS>                                            3,484,979
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,484,979
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   768,112
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  26,663
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (136,206)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                             0
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.01



</TABLE>
### SUBCHAPTER III—DIAGNOSTIC INSPECTION DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS
# C_2011030EN.01001801.xml

| 29.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/18

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) (United Kingdom) made on 8 November 2010 — Lebara Ltd v The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs

(Case C-520/10)

()

2011/C 30/29

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Referring court

First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber)

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Lebara Ltd

Applicant:

Defendant: The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Where a taxable person (‘Trader A’) sells phone cards representing the right to receive telecommunications services from that person, is Article 2(1) of the Sixth VAT Directive (1) to be interpreted so as to mean that Trader A makes two supplies for VAT purposes: one at the time of the initial sale of the phone card by Trader A to another taxable person (‘Trader B’) and one at the time of its redemption (i.e. its use by a person — ‘the End User’ — to make telephone calls)? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Where a taxable person (‘Trader A’) sells phone cards representing the right to receive telecommunications services from that person, is Article 2(1) of the Sixth VAT Directive (1) to be interpreted so as to mean that Trader A makes two supplies for VAT purposes: one at the time of the initial sale of the phone card by Trader A to another taxable person (‘Trader B’) and one at the time of its redemption (i.e. its use by a person — ‘the End User’ — to make telephone calls)?

1

| 2. | If so, how (consistently with EU VAT legislation) is VAT to be applied through the chain of supply where Trader A sells the phone card to Trader B, Trader B resells the phone card in Member State B and it is eventually purchased by the End User in Member State B, and the End User then uses the phone card to make telephone calls? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If so, how (consistently with EU VAT legislation) is VAT to be applied through the chain of supply where Trader A sells the phone card to Trader B, Trader B resells the phone card in Member State B and it is eventually purchased by the End User in Member State B, and the End User then uses the phone card to make telephone calls?

---

(1)  Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment

1

OJ L 145, p. 1

---
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19A0519. IN RE KEVIN LEE HANSON, PROPOSED WARD.

The Appellant’s Motion to Withdraw Appeal, filed in the above-styled case,

is hereby GRANTED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

October 17, 2018

10/17/2018
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                               5,771
<SECURITIES>                                        39,672
<RECEIVABLES>                                        5,023
<ALLOWANCES>                                           870
<INVENTORY>                                            763
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    52,743
<PP&E>                                               1,322
<DEPRECIATION>                                         222
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      54,048
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                7,608
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                13
<OTHER-SE>                                          46,427
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        54,048
<SALES>                                              5,560
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     1,131
<CGS>                                                  689
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        4,018
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      (654)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      2,638
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1,037
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         1,601
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.12


</TABLE>
#### § 381.16 How application shall be made.

The operator of each establishment of the kind required by § 381.6 to have inspection shall make application to the Administrator for inspection service. In cases of change of name, ownership, or location, a new application shall be made.