alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 93.903 Import permits for live fish, fertilized eggs, and gametes. ( a ) Live fish, fertilized eggs, or gametes of SVC-susceptible species imported into the United States must be accompanied by an import permit issued by APHIS and must be imported within 30 days after the proposed date of arrival stated in the import permit.
( b ) An application for an import permit must be submitted for each shipment of live fish, fertilized eggs, or gametes of SVC-susceptible species to Strategy and Policy, Veterinary Services, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, 4700 River Road, Riverdale, MD 20737-1231. Application forms for import permits may be obtained from this address.
( c ) A completed application shall include the following information: ( 1 ) The name and address of the person intending to export live fish, fertilized eggs, or gametes of SVC-susceptible species to the United States;
( 2 ) The proposed date of shipment to the United States;
( 3 ) The name and address of the person intending to import live fish, fertilized eggs, or gametes of SVC-susceptible species into the United States;
( 4 ) The species and number of live fish, fertilized eggs, or gametes of SVC-susceptible species to be imported into the United States;
( 5 ) The purpose of the importation;
( 6 ) The port of embarkation;
( 7 ) The mode of transportation;
( 8 ) The route of travel, including all carrier stops en route;
( 9 ) The port of entry in the United States;
( 10 ) The proposed date of arrival in the United States; and
( 11 ) The name and address of the person to whom the live fish, fertilized eggs, or gametes of SVC-susceptible species will be delivered in the United States.
( d ) If APHIS determines that the live fish, fertilized eggs, or gametes are eligible for importation, APHIS will issue an import permit indicating the applicable conditions for importation. An import permit does not guarantee that any live fish, fertilized eggs, or gametes will be allowed entry into the United States; the fish, fertilized eggs, or gametes will be allowed to enter the United States only if they meet all applicable requirements of the permit and regulations.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0301) [71 FR 51435, Aug. 30, 2006, as amended at 86 FR 45625, Aug. 16, 2021]
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

VALERY LAVRIK
, Appellant,

v.

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE O/B/O LUBOV LAVRIK

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 3301

[ April 20, 2022 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Sarah Willis , Judge; L.T. Case No.

502014DR011639XXXXNB

.

Troy William Klein of the Law Office of Troy W. Klein, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attor ney General, and Toni C. Bernstein, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for appellee.

CONFESSION OF ERROR

M AY
, J.

A father appeals an o rder on the Department of Revenue ’s [DOR’s] Amended Motion for Contempt which found him in contempt for failing to pay child support. He argues the trial court erred in failing to make statutorily required findings. The D OR filed a Confession of Error

.

In the Confession of Error, the DOR agrees the trial court erred in failing

to make findings regarding the father’s ability to pay the purge amount.

See Bowen v. Bowen , 471 So. 2d 1274 (Fla. 1985)

. We therefore reverse and remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Reversed and Remanded.

C ONNER

, C.J., and W ARNER , J., concur.2 * * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
§ 442.3 Scale requirements for accurate weights, repairs, adjustments, and replacements after inspection. ( a ) All scales used to determine the net weight of meat and poultry products sold or otherwise distributed in commerce in federally inspected meat and poultry establishments will be installed, maintained, and operated in a manner that ensures accurate weights. Such scales shall meet the applicable requirements contained in National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Handbook 44, ”Specifications, Tolerances, and Other Technical Requirements for Weighing and Measuring Devices,” 1999 Edition, November 1988, which is incorporated by reference. This incorporation was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. (These materials are incorporated as they exist on the date of approval.) A notice of any change in the Handbook cited here will be published in the Federal Register. Copies may be purchased from the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. The incorporation information also is available for inspection at the Office of the Federal Register Information Center, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC 20408.
( b ) All scales used to determine the net weight of meat or poultry products sold or otherwise distributed in commerce or in States designated under section 301(c) of the Federal Meat Inspection Act and section 5(c) of the Poultry Products Inspection Act shall be of sufficient capacity to weigh the entire unit or package.
( c ) No scale will be used at a federally inspected establishment to determine the net weight of meat or poultry products unless it has been found upon test and inspection, as specified in NIST Handbook 44 to provide accurate weight. If a scale is inspected or tested and found to be inaccurate, or if any repairs, adjustments, or replacements are made to a scale, it shall not be used until it has been reinspected and retested by a USDA official, or a State or local government weights and measures official, or a State registered or licensed scale repair firm or person, and it must meet all accuracy requirements as specified in NIST Handbook 44. If a USDA inspector has put a ”Retain” tag on a scale, the tag can only be removed by a USDA inspector. As long as the tag is on the scale, it shall not be used.
#### § 93.416 Appearance of disease among ruminants in quarantine.

If any contagious disease appears among ruminants during the quarantine period special precautions shall be taken to prevent spread of the infection to other animals in the quarantine station or to those outside the grounds. The affected ruminants shall be disposed of as the Administrator may direct, depending upon the nature of the disease.
# C_2010195EN.01001901.xml

| 17.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 195/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 195/19

---

Order of the General Court of 26 May 2010 — Noko Ngele v Commission

(Case T-15/10 R)

(Application for interim measures - Formal requirements - Inadmissibility)

2010/C 195/31

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Mariyus Noko Ngele (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: F. Sabakunzi, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Bordes, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Essentially, an application to have the activity of the ‘Centre pour le développement de l’entreprise (CDE)’ in Belgium declared illegitimate, to prevent the Commission and its agents from entering into financial relations with the CDE or from recognising the legitimacy of the CDE and to order the Commission to pay the applicant a sum of money if the Commission recognises the legitimacy of that body

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim relief is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim relief is dismissed.

| 2. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Costs are reserved.

---
In The Matter Of:

EPA Bristol Bay Public Meetings -- Nondalton

August 13, 2014

Midnight Sun Court Reporters

511 W. 9th Ave.

Anchorage, AK 99501

Ph. 907-258-7100

Fax 907-276-6727

To open files, click on the desired file type in bookmark on left.

For quick saving or searching multiple files, click attachments tab (or paperclip) on left.

For best viewing/searching, use Adobe Reader/Acrobat ver. 9 or higher

(www.adobe.com).
#### § 310.8 Passing and marking of carcasses and parts.

Carcasses and parts found to be sound, healthful, wholesome, and otherwise not adulterated shall be passed and marked as provided in part 316 of this subchapter. In all cases where carcasses showing localized lesions are passed for food or for cooking and “U.S. Retained” tags are attached to the carcasses, the affected tissues shall be removed and condemned before the tags are removed. “U.S. Retained” tags shall be removed only by a Program employee.
# C_2006184EN.01000801.xml

| 8.8.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 184/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.8.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 184/8

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.3867 — Vattenfall/Elsam and E2 Assets)

(2006/C 184/08)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 22 December 2005, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3867. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex) |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32005M3867. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law. (http://ec.europa.eu/eur-lex/lex)

---
# C_2012039EN.01002101.xml

| 11.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 39/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 39/21

---

Order of the General Court of 12 December 2011 — Truvo Belgium v OHIM — AOL (TRUVO and Truvo)

(Joined Cases T-528/10, T-69/11 and T-77/11) (1)

(2012/C 39/40)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the joined cases be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 30, 29.1.2011, OJ C 89, 19.3.2011 and OJ C 95, 26.3.2011.

---
# C_2007047EN.01000501.xml

| 1.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 47/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 47/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

28 February 2007

(2007/C 47/06)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3211 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 156,45 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4527 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67365 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2763 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6136 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,97 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1200 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5794 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,295 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 254,70 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7061 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9181 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,3975 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 34,440 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8715 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6761 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5419 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,3197 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8870 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0186 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 244,15 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,5849 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,2260 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3488 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 063,62 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6278 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 64,139 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,5260 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,900 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3211

JPY

Japanese yen

156,45

DKK

Danish krone

7,4527

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67365

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2763

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6136

ISK

Iceland króna

87,97

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1200

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5794

CZK

Czech koruna

28,295

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

254,70

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7061

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9181

RON

Romanian leu

3,3975

SKK

Slovak koruna

34,440

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8715

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6761

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5419

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,3197

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8870

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0186

KRW

South Korean won

1 244,15

ZAR

South African rand

9,5849

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,2260

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3488

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 063,62

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6278

PHP

Philippine peso

64,139

RUB

Russian rouble

34,5260

THB

Thai baht

44,900

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
#### § 325.4 [Reserved]
# C_2012287EN.01001601.xml

| 22.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/16

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 12 July 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — J.J. Komen en Zonen Beheer Heerhugowaard BV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën

(Case C-326/11) (1)

1

(Sixth VAT Directive - Article 13B(g), read in conjunction with Article 4(3)(a) - Supply of buildings and the land upon which they stand - Supply of a building undergoing work with the view to the creation of a new building by transformation - Continuation and completion of the work by the purchaser after the supply - Exemption from VAT)

2012/C 287/27

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: J.J. Komen en Zonen Beheer Heerhugowaard BV

Applicant:

Defendant: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Interpretation of Articles 4(3)(a) and 13B(g) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1) — Exemptions provided for in the Sixth Directive — Exemption for supplies of buildings and the land on which they stand — Supply of a building on which work is being carried out with a view to the creation of a new building — Continuation and completion of the work by the purchaser after the supply

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 13B(g) of the Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, read in conjunction with Article 4(3)(a) of that directive, must be interpreted as meaning that the exemption from value added tax provided for in that first provision covers a supply of immovable property consisting of a plot of land and an old building undergoing transformation into a new building, such as that in issue in the main proceedings, where, at the time of that supply, the old building had only undergone partial demolition work and was, at least in part, still used as such.

---

(1)  OJ C 269, 10.9.2011.

1

---
#### § 93.520 Import permit and declaration for swine.

For all swine offered for importation from countries of Central America or of the West Indies, the importer or his or her agent shall present two copies of a declaration as provided in § 93.506.

[55 FR 34195, Aug. 2, 1990. Redesignated and amended at 62 FR 56012, 56020, Oct. 28, 1997]
-  Home 
-  Technical Resources 
-  Pipeline Technical Resources 
-  Operator Qualifications 

# In This Section

                      -  Operator Qualification Overview 
                      -  About Operator Qualification 
                      -  Inspection Information 
                      -  Regulatory Information 
                      -  FAQs 
                      -  Historical Data and Information 
                      -  Operator Qualification Contacts 

## Related Documents

                  -                                          Operator Qualification (OQ) Glossary                    

# Operator Qualification Overview

The Operator Qualification rule was adopted into the Code of Federal Regulations under Subpart N in 49 CFR Part 192 and Subpart G in 49 CFR Part 195. **Under the rule, each pipeline operator is responsible for developing an OQ program, following their written OQ plan, establishing a covered task list applicable to their system, and defining the training and qualification requirements for personnel performing covered tasks on their pipeline facility.** It is the operator's responsibility to ensure their contractors and vendors comply with their program requirements. **PHMSA does not provide training for operator qualification.**

PHMSA makes technical reference materials available related to OQ. Natural gas and hazardous liquid operators may access these technical materials to better understand and comply with OQ regulatory requirements.

Operators should refer to the Regulatory Information for a history of changes to various sections of the Code of Federal Regulations. For an official record of current regulations, please refer to the Electronic Code of Federal Regulations.
# C_2011080EN.01002102.xml

| 12.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 80/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 80/21

---

Action brought on 27 December 2010 — Biodes v OHIM — Manasul International (LINEASUL)

(Case T-598/10)

2011/C 80/41

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Biodes, SL (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: E. Manresa Medina, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Manasul International, SL (Ponferrada, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 23 September 2010 in Case R 1520/2009-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 23 September 2010 in Case R 1520/2009-1;

| — | order the defendant and any interveners to pay all the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant and any interveners to pay all the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Biodes, SL.

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark containing the word element ‘LINEASUL’ for goods in Classes 5, 30 and 31.

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Manasul International, SL.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: National figurative marks containing the word elements ‘MANASUL’ and ‘MANASUL ORO’ for goods in Classes 5, 30 and 31.

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition rejected.

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal upheld and mark applied for refused.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, (1) since there is no similarity between the marks at issue and the Board of Appeal failed to examine the proof of use of the earlier marks.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

1

---
## Program Evaluations

                  -  Evaluation Reports 
                  -  Evaluation Policies 
                  -  Ongoing Evaluations 

#   Evaluation Policies

The Foundation for Evidence-Based Policymaking Act of 2018 (“Evidence Act”) was signed into law (Public Law 115-435) on January 14, 2019. It requires agencies to identify and set priorities for evidence-building in consultation with their stakeholders. The Evidence Act also augments ongoing agency strategic planning activities to promote better use of management of data and evidence, consistent with the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-11, Part VI of Preparation, Submission, and Execution of the Budget.

Under the Evidence Act, federal agencies are expected to expand their capacity for engaging in program evaluation by designating evaluation officers, developing learning agendas; producing annual evaluation plans, and enabling a workforce to conduct internal evaluations. To this end, SAMHSA seeks to promote rigor, relevance, transparency, independence, and ethics in the conduct of its evaluations.

Click here to view Evaluation Policies and Procedures.