alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §§251 to 256. Repealed. Pub. L. 90–628, §1(a), Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1320

Section 251, acts Aug. 31, 1916, ch. 426, §1, 39 Stat. 673; June 11, 1934, ch. 447, §1, 48 Stat. 930, set standards for Climax baskets for grapes and other fruits and vegetables and for mushrooms.

Section 252, act Aug. 31, 1916, ch. 426, §2, 39 Stat. 673, set standards for standard basket or container for small fruits and vegetables.

Section 253, acts Aug. 31, 1916, ch. 426, §3, 39 Stat. 674; June 11, 1934, c. 447, §2, 48 Stat. 930, set penalties for failure to conform to standards.

Section 254, act Aug. 31, 1916, ch. 426, §4, 39 Stat. 674, provided for examinations and tests by Department of Agriculture and for promulgation of rules and regulations covering allowable tolerances and variations.

Section 255, acts Aug. 31, 1916, ch. 426, §5, 39 Stat. 674; June 25, 1948, ch. 646, §1, 62 Stat. 909, made United States attorney responsible for commencing actions to enforce penalties.

Section 256, act Aug. 31, 1916, ch. 426, §6, 39 Stat. 674, covered guaranty given by manufacturers or sellers of baskets as to correctness of such containers.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Pub. L. 90–628, §3, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1320, provided that: "This Act [repealing sections 251 to 257i of this title and amending section 1459 of this title] shall become effective 60 days after enactment [Oct. 22, 1968]."
# C_2011113EN.01001302.xml

| 9.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/13

---

Order of the General Court of 16 February 2011 — Lux Management Holding SA v OHIM — Zeis Excelsa (KULTE)

(Case T-130/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for a declaration of invalidity - Agreement for co-existence of the marks and withdrawal of the application for a declaration of invalidity - No need to adjudicate)

2011/C 113/26

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Lux Management Holding SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: S. Mas, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Zeis Excelsa SpA (Montegranaro, Italy)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 January 2010 (Case R 712/2008-4) concerning proceedings between Zeis Excelsa SpA and Lux Management Holding SA for a declaration of invalidity

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | Lux Management Holding SA shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Lux Management Holding SA shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 134, 22.5.2010.

1

---
§ 83.3 Definitions. As used in this part: ( a ) *Individual* means a citizen of the United States or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence;
( b ) *Information* means papers, records, photographs, magnetic storage media, micro storage media, and other documentary materials, regardless of physical form or characteristics, containing data about an individual and required by GAO in pursuance of law or in connection with the discharge of official business, as defined by statute, regulation, or administrative procedure;
( c ) *Maintain* includes to collect, to use, or to disseminate;
( d ) *Personnel record* means any record concerning an individual which is maintained pursuant to GAO's personnel management process or personnel policy setting process;
( e ) *Record* means any item, collection, or grouping of information about an individual that is maintained by GAO, including, but not limited to, education, financial transactions, medical history, criminal history, or employment history, that contains the name or other identifying particular assigned to the individual, such as a fingerprint, voice print, or a photograph;
( f ) *Routine use* means the disclosure of a record for a purpose which is compatible with the purpose for which it was collected;
( g ) *System of personnel records* means a group of personnel records under the control of GAO from which information is retrieved by the name of the individual or by some identifying number, symbol, or other indentifying particular assigned to the individual; and,
( h ) *System manager* means the Director of Personnel, his designee, or other GAO official designated by the Comptroller General, who has the authority to decide matters relative to systems of personnel records maintained by GAO.
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Seeks Applications for Grants to Increase Health Care Access in the Delta Region

WASHINGTON, Aug. 29, 2018 – Assistant to the Secretary for Rural Development Anne Hazlett today 

announced that USDA is seeking applications for grants to increase access to health care under USDA’s Delta 

Health Care Services Grant program. 

The Delta Health Care Services Grant program provides financial assistance to address unmet health needs in 

the Delta Region through cooperation among health care professionals, institutions of higher education, 

research institutions, and economic development entities in the Delta Region. The Region is comprised of the 

252 counties and parishes within the states of Alabama, Arkansas, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, 

Missouri, and Tennessee that are served by the Delta Regional Authority.

Grants are awarded on a competitive basis. They range from a minimum award of $50,000 to a maximum 

grant award of $1 million.

Questions about the application process may be directed to the USDA Rural Development State Office where 

the applicant is located. For a list of offices, visit the state office website. 

Paper applications are due Nov. 26, 2018. Electronic applications are due Nov. 19, 2018. For more 

information on how to apply for a grant, see page 44015 of the Aug. 29 Federal Register. Potential applicants 

are encouraged to review the notice carefully since programmatic changes for this funding cycle may affect 

applicant or project status. Potential applicants are also strongly encouraged to file their application early to 

allow sufficient time to address any issues that may arise.

USDA encourages applications that will support recommendations made in the report to the President from 

the Task Force on Agriculture and Rural Prosperity to help improve life in rural America. Applicants are 

encouraged to consider projects that provide measurable results in helping rural communities build robust and 

sustainable economies through strategic investments in infrastructure, partnerships and innovation. Key 

strategies include:

Achieving e-Connectivity for rural America

Developing the rural economy

Harnessing technological innovation

Supporting a rural workforce

Improving quality of life

#
### §4586. Public disclosure of final orders and agreements

#### (a) In general

The Director shall make available to the public—

(1) any written agreement or other written statement for which a violation may be redressed by the Director or any modification to or termination thereof, unless the Director, in the Secretary's 1 discretion, determines that public disclosure would be contrary to the public interest or determines under subsection (c) that public disclosure would seriously threaten the financial health or security of the enterprise;

(2) any order that is issued with respect to any administrative enforcement proceeding initiated by the Director under this subpart and that has become final in accordance with sections 4582 and 4583 of this title; and

(3) any modification to or termination of any final order made public pursuant to this subsection.

#### (b) Hearings

All hearings with respect to any notice of charges issued by the Director shall be open to the public, unless the Director, in the Secretary's 1 discretion, determines that holding an open hearing would be contrary to the public interest.

#### (c) Delay of public disclosure under exceptional circumstances

If the Director makes a determination in writing that the public disclosure of any final order pursuant to subsection (a) would seriously threaten the financial soundness of the enterprise, the Director may delay the public disclosure of such order for a reasonable time.

#### (d) Documents filed under seal in public enforcement hearings

The Director may file any document or part thereof under seal in any hearing under this subpart if the Director determines in writing that disclosure thereof would be contrary to the public interest.

#### (e) Retention of documents

The Director shall keep and maintain a record, for not less than 6 years, of all documents described in subsection (a) and all enforcement agreements and other supervisory actions and supporting documents issued with respect to or in connection with any enforcement proceeding initiated by the Director under this subpart.

#### (f) Disclosures to Congress

This section may not be construed to authorize the withholding, or to prohibit the disclosure, of any information to the Congress or any committee or subcommittee thereof.

(Pub. L. 102–550, title XIII, §1346, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 3968; Pub. L. 110–289, div. A, title I, §1130(e)(3)(C), July 30, 2008, 122 Stat. 2711.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2008—Subsecs. (a) to (e). Pub. L. 110–289 substituted "Director" for "Secretary" wherever appearing.

1 So in original. Probably should be "Director's".
From: Dydasco, Darlene A [mailto:darlene.a.dydasco@boeing.com]

Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2014 12:47 AM To: Konrad Dymowski Cc: l.mordecki@enterair.pl Subject: RE: ENT, PO14 -221 ; PN: 65C38399 - 13 Dear Konrad, I’m afraid the commit date is 19Jan15. The reason for the delay is the shortage of part number 415 - 1767 - 1 light plate where we are unable to obtain an improved schedule for the supplier. I apologize for the delay. Please let me know if you have any que stions. Thank you, Darlene Dydasco Puget Sound Kitting / Retrofit - Service Bulletins 737 Classic Service Bulletins & Modification Programs Spares/Material Management, CAS Office Phone: 206 - 662 - 2291
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF LOSS AND ACCUMULATED DEFICIT AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE  TO SUCH 10QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED October 31,
1998.
       
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          Apr-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               Oct-31-1998
<CASH>                                            4006
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        7
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  4013
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    4602
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      10000
<COMMON>                                          1935
<OTHER-SE>                                       (7633)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      4602
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2988
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (2988)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (2988)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.001)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.001)

        

</TABLE>
§ 78.41 State/area classification. ( a ) *Class Free.* Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virgin Islands, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.
( b ) *Class A.* None.
( c ) *Class B.* None.
[51 FR 32580, Sept. 12, 1986] Editorial Note
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations affecting § 78.41, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*
# C_2006281EN.01002702.xml

| 18.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/27

---

Order of the President of the Court of 14 July 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-416/05) (1)

1

(2006/C 281/44)

Language of the case: French

Language of the case: French

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 10, 14.1.2006.

1

---
# C_2013114EN.01003101.xml

| 20.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 114/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 114/31

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 March 2013 — Cindu Chemicals and Others v ECHA

(Case T-95/10) (1)

1

(REACH - Identification of anthracene oil, anthracene low as a substance of very high concern - Actions for annulment - Actionable measure - Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures - Direct concern - Admissibility - Equal treatment - Proportionality)

2013/C 114/48

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Cindu Chemicals BV (Uithoorn, Netherlands), Deza, a.s. (Valašske Meziříčí, Czech Republic), Koppers Denmark A/S (Nyborg, Denmark) and Koppers UK Ltd (Scunthorpe, United Kingdom) (represented initially by: K. Van Maldegem, R. Cana, lawyers, and P. Sellar, Solicitor, and subsequently by K. Van Maldegem and R. Cana)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (represented by: M. Heikkilä and W. Broere, acting as Agents, assisted by J. Stuyck, lawyer)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: P. Oliver and G. Wilms, subsequently by P. Oliver and E. Manhaeve, acting as Agents, assisted by K. Sawyer, barrister, and thereafter by P. Oliver and E. Manhaeve)

Re:

Re:

Action for the partial annulment of the decision of the ECHA, published on 13 January 2010, to identify anthracene oil, anthracene low (EC No 292-604-8) as a substance meeting the criteria set out in Article 57 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC, in accordance with Article 59 of REACH.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action

| 2. | Orders Cindu Chemicals BV, Deza, a.s., Koppers Denmark A/S and Koppers UK Ltd to pay, in addition to their own costs, the costs incurred by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA); |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Cindu Chemicals BV, Deza, a.s., Koppers Denmark A/S and Koppers UK Ltd to pay, in addition to their own costs, the costs incurred by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA);

| 3. | Declares that the European Commission is to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Declares that the European Commission is to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 113, 1.5.2010.

1

---
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

As registeredindependent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report on the financial statements of Cambridge Heart, Inc. as of and for the years ending December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, dated March 31,2009, included in this Form 10-K, into the Company’s previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-12411, 333-93201, 333-72648, 333-85246, 333-108167, 333-114304, 333-135972, 333-143980, 333-150202 and 333-150203) and theCompany’s previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-143091, 333-121915 and 333-106033). 

/s/ Vitale, Caturano &Company, P.C. 

VITALE, CATURANO & COMPANY, P.C. 

March 31, 2009 

Boston, Massachusetts
§ 390.8 Agency response to requests. ( a ) The response to Freedom of Information requests and appeals by officials named in §§ 390.5 and 390.7 of this part shall be governed by and made in accordance with 7 CFR 1.7 and the regulations in this part.
( b ) If requests for records and information are received by field offices, the field office will immediately notify the FOIA Coordinator or designee by telephone and transmit the request to the FOIA office. In rare instances, the FOIA Coordinator or designee will authorize a release of the requested records to the field office receiving the request. The request will be considered as having been received on the date of arrival in the office of the Coordinator or designee. Any person whose request for records has been granted may inspect and copy the records (or copies) at the office listed in § 390.4 of this part in accordance with the provisions of that section and with § 390.6. Copies also may be obtained by mail.
# C_2010246EN.01001901.xml

| 11.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/19

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo (Spain) lodged on 7 June 2010 — Telefónica de España, S.A. v Administración del Estado

(Case C-284/10)

()

2010/C 246/32

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal Supremo

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Telefónica de España, S.A

Applicant:

Defendant: Administración del Estado

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Does Directive 97/13/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 April 1997 on a common framework for general authorisations and individual licences in the field of telecommunications services and, in particular, Article 6 thereof, permit Member States to charge holders of general authorisations an annual fee which is calculated on the basis of a percentage of gross operating income invoiced in the relevant year, subject to such amount not exceeding two per thousand, and which is applied for the purpose of defraying the costs, including management costs, incurred by the telecommunications regulatory body in the implementation of the scheme of licences and general authorisations, as provided for in Article 71 of Law 11/1998 of 24 April 1998 on telecommunications?

1

---

(1)  OJ 1997 L 117, p. 15.

1

---
#### § 592.240 Report of violations.

Each inspection program employee shall report, in the manner prescribed by the Administrator, all violations and noncompliance under the Act and this part of which such inspection program employee has knowledge.
§ 315.1 Carcasses and parts passed for cooking; rendering into lard or tallow. Carcasses and parts passed for cooking may be rendered into lard in accordance with § 319.702 of this subchapter or rendered into tallow, provided such rendering is done in the following manner: ( a ) When closed rendering equipment is used, the lower opening, except when permanently connected with a blowline, shall first be sealed securely by a Program employee; then the carcasses or parts shall be placed in such equipment in his presence, after which the upper opening shall be securely sealed by such employee. When the product passed for cooking in the tank does not consist of a carcass or whole primal part, the requirements for sealing shall be at the discretion of the circuit supervisor. Such carcasses and parts shall be cooked for a time sufficient to render them effectually into lard or tallow, provided all parts of the products are heated to a temperature not lower than 170 °F. for a period of not less than 30 minutes.
( b ) At establishments not equipped with closed rendering equipment for rendering carcasses and parts passed for cooking into lard and tallow, such carcasses or parts may be rendered in open kettles under the direct supervision of a Program employee. Such rendering shall be done during regular hours of work and in compliance with the requirements as to temperature and time specified in paragraph (a) of this section.
[35 FR 15577, Oct. 3, 1970, as amended at 43 FR 25420, June 13, 1978]
Cooperative Papers & Articles by Julie A. Hogeland, USDA Agricultural Economist

For more information about these publications, email coopinfo@wdc.usda.gov

Journal Papers/Book Chapters:

 “Managing Uncertainty and Expectations: The Strategic Response of U.S. Agricultural Cooperatives to

Agricultural Industrialization,” Journal of Co‐operative Organization and Management, June, 23, 2015.

http://usda‐ars.academia.edu/JulieHogeland

 “From Agrarian to Global Values: How 20th Century U.S. Agricultural Cooperatives Came to Terms with

Agricultural Industrialization,” Journal of Rural Cooperation, 41 (2), 2013: pp. 97‐113.

http://departments.agri.huji.ac.il/econocen/en/jrc/jrc‐v41‐2/v‐41‐

2%20FROM%20AGRARIAN%20TO%20GLOBAL%20VALUES.pdf

 “The Normative Construction of U.S. Agricultural Cooperatives, 1900‐2008,” Cooperation in Economy and

Society, Chapter 10, AltaMira Press, Division of Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Copyright © 2010 by Society for

Economic Anthropology.*  

 “An Interpretation of the Competitive Yardstick Model Using Critical Discourse Analysis,” Journal of

Cooperatives, Volume 20, 2007, pages 34‐48.  http://accc.k‐

state.edu/ncera210/jocpdfs/v20/HogelandJune2007.pdf

 “The Economic Culture of U.S. Agricultural Cooperatives,” Culture & Agriculture, Volume 28, No. 2, 2006, pp.

67‐79. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1525/cag.2006.28.2.67/epdf

 “How Culture Drives Economic Behavior in Cooperatives” Journal of Rural Cooperation, 32 (1), 2004: pp. 19‐36.

http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/96041/2/HowCultureDrivesEconomicBehavior.pdf