alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Gilbane Building Company *et al. vs.*Nicola DeFillipo.

JULY 3, 1952.

Present : Flynn, C. J., Capotosto, Baker, Condon and O’Connell, JJ.

Condon, J.

This is a petition by an employer and its insurance carrier to review a preliminary agreement for workmen’s compensation on the ground that the compensable incapacity therein agreed to had terminated. After a hearing in the superior court the trial justice expressly found that “respondent is no longer incapacitated from the injuries set out in the preliminary agreement,” and ordered a decree entered terminating respondent’s total disability compensation forthwith. From that decree respondent has appealed to this court.

This appeal was heard here together with an appeal from the denial of the employee’s petition to amend the preliminary agreement, as both cases had been tried at the same time in the superior court before the same justice. The other appeal is the subject of a separate opinion filed this day and therefore will not be discussed here. *DeFillipo*v. *Gilbane Building Co.,*79 R. I. 462.

In the instant case the respondent employee claimed an appeal in which he alleged that the decree of the superior court was against the law and the evidence. However, he did not press either reason in his argument before us. On the contrary we understood him to concede in effect that the decree was correct. He expressly stated in his brief that there seemed to be no argument against the decision *462upon which the decree is based. Indeed, his entire brief is concerned solely with a discussion of the reasons in support of the other appeal.

*Hinckley, Allen, Salisbury & Parsons, Matthew W. Goring, Thomas J. Hogan,*for petitioner.

*Francis Cappalli,*for respondent.

Apparently the only purpose of the appeal now under consideration was to preserve the *status quo*pending determination of the other appeal. In the circumstances we must conclude that respondent has waived his reasons of appeal in the instant case since he has neither briefed nor argued them. This being so there is no need for any further discussion here of the evidence or the law upon which the trial justice relied in granting the petition to terminate respondent’s compensation.

The respondent’s appeal is denied and dismissed, the decree appealed from is affirmed, and the cause is remanded to the superior court for further proceedings.
# C_2010209EN.01003901.xml

| 31.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/39

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 9 June 2010 — COLT Télécommunications France v Commission

(Case T-79/10 R)

(Application for interim measures - State aid - Operation of a very-high-speed broadband electronic communications network - Compensation for public service costs - Decision finding that the notified measure does not constitute aid - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Lack of urgency)

2010/C 209/60

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: COLT Télécommunications France SAS (Paris, France) (represented by: M. Debroux, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission (represented by B. Stromsky and C. Urraca Caviedes, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of Commission Decision C(2009) 7426 final of 30 September 2009 on a plan to grant compensation for public service costs of EUR 59 million for the establishment and operation of a very-high-speed broadband electronic communications network in the department of Hauts-de-Seine (France).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Costs are reserved.

---
# C_2012355EN.01002502.xml

| 17.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 355/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 355/25

---

Judgment of the General Court of 2 October 2012 — ELE.SI.A v Commission

(Case T-312/10) (1)

1

(Arbitration clause - Sixth multiannual framework programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities, contributing to the creation of the European Research Area and to innovation (2002 to 2006) - Contract concerning the ‘I-Way, Intelligent, co-operative system in cars for road safety’ project - Termination of the contract - Request for repayment of the financial contribution paid - Damages - Action seeking to obtain the full financial contribution requested and to challenge the request for repayment - Counterclaim)

2012/C 355/54

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Elettronica e sistemi per automazione (ELE.SI.A) SpA (Guidonia Montecelio, Italy) (represented by: P. Tomassi, S. Baratti and P. Caprile, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Aresu and A. Sauka, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application seeking payment of the financial contribution to which the applicant considers that it is entitled under the terms of Contract No 27195, entered into on 13 December 2005 between the Commission and the applicant, relating to the research project entitled ‘I-Way, Intelligent, co-operative system in cars for road safety’, and a counterclaim for repayment of a part of the financial contribution paid and for payment of damages.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The General Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action brought by Elettronica e sistemi per automazione (ELE.SI.A) SpA; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action brought by Elettronica e sistemi per automazione (ELE.SI.A) SpA;

| 2. | Orders ELE.SI.A to pay to the European Commission a sum of EUR 184 129,74, plus interest from 18 May 2010, together with a sum of EUR 7 344,46, plus interest from 18 June 2010; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders ELE.SI.A to pay to the European Commission a sum of EUR 184 129,74, plus interest from 18 May 2010, together with a sum of EUR 7 344,46, plus interest from 18 June 2010;

| 3. | Orders ELE.SI.A to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders ELE.SI.A to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 260, 25.9.2010.

1

---
#### § 93.702 Restrictions.

Hedgehogs and tenrecs not specifically prohibited from being imported under § 93.701 may be imported into the United States only in accordance with the regulations in this subpart.

[55 FR 31495, Aug. 2, 1990. Redesignated and amended at 62 FR 56012, 56021, Oct. 28, 1997]
# C_2011319EN.01001803.xml

| 29.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 319/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 319/18

---

Judgment of the General Court of 21 September 2011 — Nike International v OHIM (DYNAMIC SUPPORT)

(Case T-512/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark DYNAMIC SUPPORT - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2011/C 319/38

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Nike International Ltd (Beaverton, Oregon, United States of America) (represented by: M. de Justo Bailey, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 August 2010 (case R 640/2010-4), concerning an application for registration of the word sign DYNAMIC SUPPORT as a Community trade mark

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Nike International Ltd to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Nike International Ltd to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 346, 18.12.2010.

1

---
<PAGE>

                                                               EXHIBIT 23.1




                     CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                     ----------------------------------


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectuses
constituting part of the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-60913,
333-76505 and 333-89659) of Toyota Motor Credit Corporation of our report dated
October 29, 1999 appearing on page 30 of this Form 10-K.


/S/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP



Los Angeles, California
December 20, 1999
Dismiss and Opinion Filed March 18, 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05
- 20
- 00823
- CV IN THE INTEREST OF R .M., R.M., AND R.M., CHILDREN On Appeal from the 469th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 469
- 54067
- 2018 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Myers, Osborne, and Carlyle Opinion by Justice Osborne Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue. By order dated January 14, 202 1, we granted appellant’s request to extend time to file his brief and ordered it filed no later than February 16, 2021. By postcard dated February 23, 2021, we notified appellant the time for filing his brief had expired. We directed appellant to file a brief and an extension motion within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to file his brief by that time might result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not filed a brief, filed a further extension mo tion, nor otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal.– 2

–

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b), (c).

200823 F

. P 05 /Leslie Osborne/ LESLIE OSBORNE JUSTICE– 3

– 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT
IN THE INTEREST OF R.M., R.M., AND R.M., CHILDREN
No. 05

- 20

- 00823

- CV On Appeal from the 469th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 469

- 54067

- 2018. Opinion delivered by Justice Osborne. Justices Myers and Carlyle participating. In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED

. Judgment entered this 18th day of March , 2021

.
# C_2010161EN.01005301.xml

| 19.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/53

---

Action brought on 21 April 2010 — Zitro IP v OHIM — Show Ball Informática (BINGO SHOWALL)

(Case T-179/10)

(2010/C 161/83)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Zitro IP Sàrl (Luxembourg) (represented by: A. Canela Giménez, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Show Ball Informática Ltda

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of OHIM, and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of OHIM, and

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Zitro IP.

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘BINGO SHOWALL’ (application for registration No 6 059 919), for goods and services in Classes 9, 28 and 41

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Show Ball Informática.

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community figurative mark (No 5 092 275) containing the word element ‘SHOW BALL’, for goods and services in Classes 9 and 42.

Decision of the Opposition Division: Partial rejection of the application for registration.

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal.

Pleas in law: Incorrect interpretation and application of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 on the Community trade mark.

---
### SUBCHAPTER II—INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION IN GLOBAL CHANGE RESEARCH
#### § 11.3 Authority to represent in payment cases.

In the prosecution of claims involving payments to be made by the United States, a proper power of attorney is required before an attorney or other representative may be recognized. A power of attorney from the principal may also be requested in other cases.
# C_2013189EN.01003001.xml

| 29.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 189/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 189/30

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 16 May 2013 — de Pretis Cagnodo and Trampuz de Pretis Cagnodo v Commission

(Case F-104/10) (1)

1

(Civil service - Social security - Serious illness - Concept - Hospitalisation - Reimbursement - Direct payment by the claims settlement office - No upper limit in the general implementing provisions for costs of stay - Obligation to inform the insured beforehand in the event of excessive billing)

2013/C 189/62

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Mario Alberto de Pretis Cagnodo and Serena Trampuz (Trieste, Italy) (represented by: C. Falagiani, lawyer)

Applicants

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and D. Martin, acting as Agents, A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision refusing to reimburse 100 % of certain medical expenses in connection with the hospitalisation of the applicant’s wife.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the claims settlement office, Ispra (Italy), as evidenced by payment note No 10 of 1 October 2009, charging Mr de Pretis Cagnodo the amount of EUR 28 800 for costs of stay for Mrs Trampuz de Pretis Cagnodo, considered excessive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the claims settlement office, Ispra (Italy), as evidenced by payment note No 10 of 1 October 2009, charging Mr de Pretis Cagnodo the amount of EUR 28 800 for costs of stay for Mrs Trampuz de Pretis Cagnodo, considered excessive;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to bear all its own costs and to pay all costs incurred by Mr de Pretis Cagnodo and Mrs Trampuz de Pretis Cagnodo. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to bear all its own costs and to pay all costs incurred by Mr de Pretis Cagnodo and Mrs Trampuz de Pretis Cagnodo.

---

(1)  OJ C 13, 15.1.2011, p. 42.

1

---
Certification Pursuant to Sections 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002

Pursuant  to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b)  of  Section  1350, Chapter 63 or Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned  officers  of  Proteo,  Inc. (the "Company") does hereby certify, to
such  officer's  knowledge,  that:

The  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the three month period ended  June 30,
2003  of  the  Company  fully  complies,  in  all  material  respects,  with the
requirements  of  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 or other
document  authentications,  acknowledging,  or  otherwise adopting the signature
that  appears  in  typed  form  within  the  electronic  version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided by Proteo, Inc. and will be
retained by Proteo, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or  its  staff  upon  request.

                                   /s/ Joerg Alte
                                   Joerg Alte
                                   Chief  Executive  Officer
                                   Chief  Financial  Officer

August 19, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 5 (Friday, January 7, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 1167]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-55]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Statement of Organization, Functions, and Delegations of 
Authority

    Part C (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) of the 
Statement of Organization, Functions, and Delegations of Authority of 
the Department of Health and Human Services (45 FR 67772-76, dated 
October 14, 1980, and corrected at 45 FR 69296, October 20, 1980, as 
amended most recently at 75 FR 70276-70277, dated November 17, 2010) is 
amended to reflect the title change for the Office of Science Quality 
and Translation, Office of the Associate Director for Science, Office 
of the Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
    Section C-B, Organization and Functions, is hereby amended as 
follows:
    Delete in its entirety the title for the Office of Science Quality 
and Translation (CASH) and insert the Office of Science Quality (CASH).

    Dated: December 29, 2010.
Barbara Harris,
Acting Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC).
[FR Doc. 2011-55 Filed 1-6-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-18-M
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 5046 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 5046

 To amend the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act to authorize 
   the contracting of functions under the Rural Business Investment 
                    Program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 17, 2020

 Mr. Barrasso (for Mrs. Fischer) introduced the following bill; which 
was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, 
                              and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act to authorize 
   the contracting of functions under the Rural Business Investment 
                    Program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rural Investment Act of 2020''.

SEC. 2. CONTRACTING OF FUNCTIONS.

    Subtitle H of the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act is 
amended by inserting after section 384P (7 U.S.C. 2009cc-15) the 
following:

``SEC. 384Q. CONTRACTING OF FUNCTIONS.

    ``(a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, to 
carry out the day-to-day management and operation of the program 
authorized by this subtitle on behalf of the Secretary, the Secretary 
shall enter into an interagency agreement under section 1535 of title 
31, United States Code, with the Administrator of the Small Business 
Administration.
    ``(b) Funding.--The costs incurred by the Administrator of the 
Small Business Administration under an agreement entered into under 
subsection (a) shall be reimbursed in accordance with section 1535 of 
title 31, United States Code, from amounts made available under section 
384S.''.

SEC. 3. APPROPRIATION.

    (a) In General.--There is appropriated, from amounts in the 
Treasury not otherwise appropriated, $1,000,000,000 to carry out the 
Rural Business Investment Program established under subtitle H of the 
Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act (7 U.S.C. 2009cc et seq.).
    (b) Requirement.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Agriculture, in coordination 
with the Administrator of the Small Business Administration, shall 
issue commitments to purchase, or to guarantee the timely payment of 
all principal and interest as scheduled on, debentures issued by rural 
business investment companies under subtitle H of the Consolidated Farm 
and Rural Development Act (7 U.S.C. 2009cc et seq.).
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.27
Compensation of Non-Employee Directors
Directors who are not officers of SEACOR Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) receive an annual retainer of $52,000 and $2,000 for every regular and special Board and Committee meeting they attend via telephone and $4,000 for every regular and special Board and Committee meeting they attend in person.
Each member of the Board who is not an employee of the Company is also granted options and Common Stock pursuant to the SEACOR Holding Inc.'s 2014 Share Incentive Plan (Exhibit 10.28 in this Annual Report on Form 10-K).
```
**CORRESPONDENCE
                      Certification Pursuant to 906 by CFO**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1250,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Power 3 Medical  Products,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, R. Paul
Gray,  Chief  Financial  Officer  of the  Company,  certify,  to the  best of my
knowledge,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully compiles with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                                  /s/ R. Paul Gray
                                                  R. Paul Gray

                                                  Chief Financial Officer
                                                  Power 3 Medical Products, Inc.
May 14, 2004
```
### §1368. Records

#### (a) Grant recipients

Each recipient of a grant under this chapter shall keep such records as the Secretary shall prescribe, including records which fully disclose the amount and the disposition of such grant, the total cost of the related approved program, the amount and nature of the cost of the program supplied by other sources, and such other records as will facilitate an effective audit.

#### (b) Access to records of recipients

The Secretary and the Comptroller General of the United States, or any of their duly authorized representatives, shall have access to any books, documents, papers, and records of the recipient that are pertinent to amounts received under this chapter.

(Pub. L. 89–182, §18, Sept. 14, 1965, 79 Stat. 684.)