alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1314.6 Obligations of TVA. ( a ) Except in the case of a security interest in favor of the United States or a Reserve Bank or otherwise as provided in § 1314.5(c), for the purposes of this part 1314, TVA and Reserve Banks shall treat the Participant to whose securities account an interest in a Book-entry TVA Power Security has been credited as the Person exclusively entitled to issue a transfer message, to receive interest and other payments with respect thereof, and otherwise to exercise all the rights and powers with respect to such security, notwithstanding any information or notice to the contrary. Neither TVA nor the Reserve Banks are liable to a Person asserting or having an adverse claim to a Security Entitlement or to a Book-entry TVA Power Security in a Participant's Security Account, including any such claim arising as a result of the transfer or disposition of a Book-entry TVA Power Security by a Reserve Bank pursuant to a transfer message that the Reserve Bank reasonably believes to be genuine.
( b ) The obligation of TVA to make payments with respect to Book-entry TVA Power Securities is discharged at the time payment in the appropriate amount is made as follows: ( 1 ) Interest or other payments on Book-entry TVA Power Securities are either credited by a Reserve Bank to a Funds Account maintained at such bank or otherwise paid as directed by the Participant.
( 2 ) Book-entry TVA Power Securities are redeemed in accordance with their terms by a Reserve Bank withdrawing the securities from the Participant's Security Account in which they are maintained and by either crediting the amount of the redemption proceeds, including both principal and interest, where applicable, to a Funds Account at such bank or otherwise paying such principal and interest as directed by the Participant. No action by the Participant ordinarily is required in connection with the redemption of a Book-entry TVA Power Security.
[62 FR 920, Jan. 7, 1997; 62 FR 8619, 8620, Feb. 26, 1997]
# C_2007129EN.01000802.xml

| 9.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/8

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'Appel, Brussels (Belgium) lodged on 29 March 2007 — AXA, Belgium SA, formerly AXA Royale Belge SA v (1) État Belge, administration de la TVA, de l'enregistrement et des domaines, (2) État Belge, administration de l'inspection spéciale des impôts

(Case C-168/07)

(2007/C 129/13)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour d'Appel de Bruxelles (Court of Appeal, Brussels)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: AXA, Belgium SA, formerly AXA Royale Belge SA

Applicant:

Defendants: (1) État Belge, administration de la TVA, de l'enregistrement et des domaines, (Belgian State, VAT, Land Registration and Estates Authority), (2) État Belge, administration de l'inspection spéciale des impôts (Belgian State, Special Tax Inspection Authority)

Defendants:

Question referred

Are the provisions of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax (1), in particular Article 13(A)(1)(f) thereof, to be interpreted as meaning that Member States may grant an exemption from the tax only where independent groups of persons supply services exclusively for the benefit of their members, to the exclusion of non-members?

1

---

(1)  Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1).

1

---
### §3418. Applicability of other Federal statutory provisions relating to information-gathering

In order to obtain information for the purpose of carrying out its functions under this chapter, the Commission shall have the same authority as is vested in the Secretary under 7151(a) of title 42 with respect to the exercise of authority under section 796(b) of this title and section 772(b), (c), and (d) of this title.

(Pub. L. 95–621, title V, §508(b), Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3408.)
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2007 (the "Report") for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange
Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

John
C. Batty, the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Affymetrix, Inc. certifies that, to the best of such officer's knowledge:



|February 29, 2008 |  | /s/JOHN C. BATTY
|----------------- |  | ----------------
|                  |  | Name:           
|                  |  | Title:          

---



QuickLinks
§ 1301.1 General provisions. ( a ) This subpart contains the rules that the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) follows in processing requests for records under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552. These rules should be read in conjunction with the text of the FOIA and the Uniform Freedom of Information Fee Schedule and Guidelines published by the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB Guidelines”). Requests made by individuals for records about themselves under the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, are processed in accordance with TVA's Privacy Act regulations as well as under this subpart. ( a ) [Reserved]
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-13-00611-CV

United Central Control, Inc., Appellant

v.

Duncan & Boyd Jewelers of Austin, LLC; Valley Forge Ins. Co. as Subrogee of D&B; 

and Hanover Insurance Co., Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 345TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GN-10-002669, HONORABLE ORLINDA NARANJO, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss its appeal. We grant the motion and dismiss

the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a).

__________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Rose and Goodwin

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: October 17, 2013
§ 114.14 Extension of expiration date for a serial or subserial. ( a ) Unless otherwise provided for in a filed Outline of Production for the product, the expiration date shall not be extended: ( 1 ) If all fractions of the product are not evaluated for potency by tests designated in the filed Outline of Production for such product in accordance with § 113.4(b) of this subchapter.
( 2 ) For any serial or portion of any serial which has left licensed premises: *Provided,* That product which has been shipped from one licensed premises to another licensed premises shall be exempt from this requirement.
( 3 ) For a serial or portion of a serial if the expiration date has been extended previously, unless otherwise authorized in accordance with § 114.1.
( b ) An extension of the expiration date may be granted by Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service if a request from the licensee is substantiated by valid test data which demonstrate the potency of the product meets or exceeds the requirements for release. The new expiration date shall be calculated from the date the latest satisfactory potency test was initiated. The extension of the expiration date shall not exceed the maximum dating allowed in the filed Outline of Production. ( 1 ) Serials are approved for redating under the condition that Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service may require the firm to retest the redated serial for potency during the extended dating period and if found unsatisfactory require it be removed from the market by the licensee.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
[50 FR 24903, June 14, 1985, as amended at 56 FR 66784, Dec. 26, 1991]
#### In the Matter of the Adoption of DANG MINH TRI, a child, by IVAN J. EZELL and NANCY EZELL, Petitioners

Adoption No. 118-75

Superior Court of Guam

August 5, 1975

ABBATE, *Judge*

DECISION

This adoption proceeding came before the Court on the 5th day of August, 1975. The petitioners, Ivan J. Ezell and Nancy Ezell, seek an order from this Court to have Dang Minh Tri, a child, declared their legal child. The natural *286parents, together with the child and petitioners, were present in Court.

Factually speaking, the minor child to be adopted is a Vietnamese refugee who, with her family, escaped prior to the occupation of South Vietnam by the Provisional Government of North Vietnam. This Court thoroughly questioned the natural parents regarding the voluntariness of their consent directly and through a qualified Vietnamese interpreter. After having examined the natural parents, the Court finds that their consent to adopt was based upon a promise they made to the petitioners, and their inability to provide support to the child. This Court also made an investigation, through its family counselor, which revealed that this adoption should not be granted. A communication was sent to the Court on 31 July 1975 recommending that the child remain with the natural parents.

In view of the foregoing, and looking at the totality of the circumstances, this Court must deny the petition for adoption.

So ordered.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alliance Laundry Systems LLC, Alliance Laundry Corporation and
Alliance Laundry Holdings LLC (the Companies) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas F. LEsperance,
Chief Executive Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ THOMAS F. LESPERANCE
|Chief Executive Officer  

November 13, 2007
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Marvin R. Banks, Jr., Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Gables Residential Trust, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Gables Residential Trust;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant andwe have:

(a)        Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

(b)        Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on our evaluation; and

(c)        Disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a)        All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)        Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  March 12, 2004

     /s/ Marvin R. Banks, Jr.                               .

Name:   Marvin R. Banks, Jr.Title:    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Double Cropping Soybeans

County Availability

Source: USDA Risk Management Agency

Data Current Date: December 06, 2023

Layer Credits: PRISM & USDA RMA

 The information displayed in this map is intended to serve as an aid in displaying data provided or stored by the Risk Management Agency. It does not modify, replace or supersede any USDA published policy provisions or procedures.

Map Projection: USA Contiguous Albers Equal Area Conic

Map Creation Date: December 06, 2023

Maps created by USDA Risk Management Agency are for spatial and visual context for depicting the basic information for “where”. Maps are not considered a survey. General Reference Only.

RMA Insurance Services

 -- Public Information --

2024 Option

Already Available

Blanket Written Agreement

Written Agreement - No History

Written Agreement - Two Years of History

Written Agreement - Three Years of History

Irrigated Double Cropping Only - Available via Blanket Written Agreement

Expanded Irrigated Double Cropping - No Written Agreement Required

XC and/or Relay Crop Written Agreement

Soybeans - Double Cropping Expansion - Public Map
§ 1301.64 Original classification authority. ( a ) Original classification authority is granted by the Director of the Information Security Oversight Office. TVA does not have original classification authority.
( b ) If information is developed that appears to require classification, or is received from any foreign government information as defined in section 6.1(s) of Executive Order 13526, the individual in custody of the information shall immediately notify the Senior Agency Official and appropriately protect the information.
( c ) If the Senior Agency Official believes the information warrants classification, it shall be sent to the appropriate agency with original classification authority over the subject matter, or to the Information Security Oversight Office, for review and a classification determination.
( d ) If there is reasonable doubt about the need to classify information, it shall be safeguarded as if it were classified pending a determination by an original classification authority. If there is reasonable doubt about the appropriate level of classification, it shall be safeguarded at the higher level of classification pending a determination by an original classification authority.
### §283. Repealed. Pub. L. 89–554, §8(a), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 655, 656

Section, acts July 20, 1949, ch. 354, title III, §301, 63 Stat. 468; Sept. 6, 1950, ch. 896, ch. III, title III, §301, 64 Stat. 628, related to appointment of personnel observing radio propagation phenomena in Arctic Region.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 04024

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

04024\04024_ Certification statement.pdf Plant certification statement

04024\04024_ Completeness Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

x 04024\04024_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

04024\04024_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 04024\04024_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04024\04024_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04024\04024_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04024\04024_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04024\04024_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

04024\Supporting Documents\04024_ Cover letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 04024\Supporting Documents\04024_ EP-091010-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

04024\Supporting Documents\04024_ PPlant-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

04024\Supporting Documents\04024_ PPlant-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
Exhibit 10.1

 

SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE

AMENDED AND RESTATED

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 

THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Second Amendment”) is made as of March 2, 2016 (the “Effective Date”) by and between Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. a Delaware corporation (the “Employer”), and Jack Khattar (the “Executive”).  In consideration of the mutual covenants contained in this Second Amendment, the Employer and the Executive agree as follows:

 

WHEREAS,  the Executive and the Employer originally entered into an employment agreement dated December 22, 2005 as amended by the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement  dated February 12, 2012, and the Amendment to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated August 8, 2014 (collectively, the “Employment Agreement”);

 

WHEREAS, the Executive and the Employer have agreed to execute this Second Amendment to the Employment Agreement effective as of the Effective Date.

 

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and other consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound hereby, agree as follows:

 

1. Capitalized terms used herein that are not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings in the Employment Agreement. All other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement not amended by this Second Amendment shall remain in full force and effect.

 

2. Paragraph 4(b) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:

 

(b)           Bonus.  The Executive shall be entitled to participate in an annual bonus program established by the Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee with such terms as may be established in the sole discretion of the Board of Directors or Compensation Committee.

 

3. Counterparts.  This Second  Amendment may be executed as a sealed instrument by the Employer, by its duly authorized officer, and by the Executive, as of the date first above written.

 

	
 
    	
SUPERNUS   PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Greg Patrick
    
	
 
    	
Name:
    	
Greg   Patrick
    
	
 
    	
Title:
    	
Chief   Financial Officer
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
/s/   Jack Khattar
    
	
 
    	
Jack   Khattar, Executive
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 28, 2009 

p0420 

Order 

 

April 28, 2009 

137890 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137890 

 COA: 269999 

Wayne CC: 05-003753 

ANTHONY LEE BAISDEN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 28, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in 

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE in part the judgment of the Court of 

Appeals and we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration of the 

defendant’s claims of sentencing error. On September 26, 2008, this Court reversed in 

part the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remanded this case to the Court of Appeals 

for consideration of the defendant’s remaining issues. In a memorandum opinion, the 

Court of Appeals adopted the analysis of the dissenting opinion from its unpublished per 

curiam opinion issued March 4, 2008 (Docket No. 269999) for its resolution of the 

remaining issues. The court then affirmed the defendant’s conviction and sentence. 

However, the dissenting opinion had determined that the defendant should be 

resentenced, finding that the trial court abused its discretion in departing from the 

sentencing guidelines because the reasons articulated for departure were not substantial 

and compelling, as required by MCL 769.34(3). The Court of Appeals affirmance of the 

defendant’s sentence in its memorandum opinion is inconsistent with the determination 

that resentencing is required. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because 

we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this 

Court. 

We do not retain jurisdiction.