alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(66 South. 387)

No. 20405.

#### STATE v. DUVALL et al. In re MURFF.

(Oct. 23, 1914.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 16, 1914.)

*(Syllabus by Editorial Staff.)*

Bail <&wkey;47 — Supreme Coubt — Original Jurisdiction.

The Supreme Court, having only appellate jurisdiction, under Const, art. 85, may not admit to bail an,accused pending an appeal from the affirmance of a conviction to the Supreme Court of the United States.

[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Bail, Cent. Dig. §§ 165-183, 257; Dec. Dig. &wkey;47.]

Application in the Supreme Court by Dora Murff for bail.

Application denied.

Philip S. Pugh, Percy T. Ogden, and L. I-I. Pugh, all of Crowley, for applicant. R. G. Pleasant, Atty. Gen., and C. B. De Bellevue, Dist. Atty., of Crowley (G. A. Gondran, of New Orleans, of counsel), for the State.

PROVOSTY, J.

Dora Murff, one of the accused herein, was indicted for murder and convicted of manslaughter and sentenced. On appeal to this court the judgment was affirmed. The case was then carried, on writ of error, to the Supreme Court of the United States (238 U. S. -, 36 Sup. Ct. -, 60 L. Ed. -), where it is now pending. ' She applies to this court for bail, alleging that by her conviction for manslaughter she was acquitted of murder, that manslaughter is bailable, that she is in jail, and that the writ of error will not be passed on before two years.

This court, having only appellate jurisdiction (Const, art. S5), cannot entertain the application, as the .acting upon it would involve the exercise of original jurisdiction.

The application is therefore denied, at the cost of applicant.
Exhibit 21.01
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                       ALLIANCE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
                           Subsidiaries of Registrant


Name of Subsidiary of Alliance         Jurisdiction or
Semiconductor Corporation                 State of
                                        Incorporation
----------------------------------  ----------------------

<S>                                   <C>
Nimbus Technology, Inc.                  California

Alliance Semiconductor                 Cayman Islands
International Corporation

Alliance Semiconductor                    Delaware
International Corporation

Alliance Semiconductor (India)              India
Private Limited

Alliance Venture Management, LLC         California

Alliance Ventures I, LP                  California

Alliance Ventures II, LP                 California

Alliance Ventures III, LP                California

Alliance Ventures IV, LP                 California

Alliance Ventures V, LP                  California

Dioptech, Inc.                            Delaware
</TABLE>
### §5525. Repealed. Pub. L. 114–329, title I, §105(n), Jan. 6, 2017, 130 Stat. 2984

Section, Pub. L. 102–194, title II, §205, Dec. 9, 1991, 105 Stat. 1602, described Environmental Protection Agency activities and authorized appropriations for fiscal years 1992 to 1996.
§ 94.10 Swine from regions where classical swine fever exists. ( a ) APHIS considers classical swine fever to exist in all regions of the world except those declared free of the disease by APHIS. ( 1 ) A list of regions that APHIS has declared free of classical swine fever is maintained on the APHIS website at *https://www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/animalhealth/animal-and-animal-product-import-information/animal-health-status-of-regions .* Copies of the list are also available via postal mail upon request to Regionalization Evaluation Services, Strategy and Policy, Veterinary Services, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, 4700 River Road, Unit 38, Riverdale, Maryland 20737; *AskRegionalization@usda.gov .*
( 2 ) APHIS will add a region to the list of those it has declared free of classical swine fever after it conducts an evaluation of the region in accordance with § 92.2 of this subchapter and finds that the disease is not present. In the case of a region formerly on this list that is removed due to an outbreak, the region may be returned to the list in accordance with the procedures for reestablishment of a region's disease-free status in § 92.4 of this subchapter. APHIS will remove a region from the list of those it has declared free of classical swine fever upon determining that the disease exists in the region based on reports APHIS receives of outbreaks of the disease from veterinary officials of the exporting country, from the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE), or from other sources the Administrator determines to be reliable.
( b ) The APHIS-defined European CSF region is a single region of low-risk for CSF.
( c ) Except as provided in § 94.31 for the APHIS-defined European CSF region, no swine that are moved from or transit any region where classical swine fever is known to exist may be imported into the United States, except for wild swine imported into the United States in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section.
( d ) Wild swine may be allowed importation into the United States by the Administrator upon request in specific cases under § 93.501 or § 93.504(c) of this chapter.
[71 FR 29070, May 19, 2006, as amended at 71 FR 31070, June 1, 2006; 72 FR 30470, June 1, 2007; 72 FR 67232, Nov. 28, 2007; 75 FR 69857, Nov. 16, 2010; 76 FR 70039, Nov. 10, 2011; 77 FR 1393, Jan. 10, 2012; 78 FR 72998, Dec. 4, 2013; 86 FR 45626, Aug. 16, 2021]
### §1069. Application of equitable principles in inter partes proceedings

In all inter partes proceedings equitable principles of laches, estoppel, and acquiescence, where applicable may be considered and applied.

(July 5, 1946, ch. 540, title I, §19, 60 Stat. 434; Pub. L. 93–596, §1, Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1949; Pub. L. 100–667, title I, §119, Nov. 16, 1988, 102 Stat. 3941.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1988—Pub. L. 100–667 struck out at end "The provisions of this section shall also govern proceedings heretofore begun in the Patent and Trademark Office and not finally determined."

1975—Pub. L. 93–596 substituted "Patent and Trademark Office" for "Patent Office".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1988 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 100–667 effective one year after Nov. 16, 1988, see section 136 of Pub. L. 100–667, set out as a note under section 1051 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1975 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 93–596 effective Jan. 2, 1975, see section 4 of Pub. L. 93–596, set out as a note under section 1111 of this title.

#### Repeal and Effect on Existing Rights

Repeal of inconsistent provisions, effect of this chapter on pending proceedings and existing registrations and rights under prior acts, see notes set out under section 1051 of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of Commerce, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of Commerce, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 5 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1263, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
### **CHAPTER 15B—NATURAL GAS**

Sec.
717.
Regulation of natural gas companies.
717a.
Definitions.
717b.
Exportation or importation of natural gas; LNG terminals.
717b–1.
State and local safety considerations.
717c.
Rates and charges.
717c–1.
Prohibition on market manipulation.
717d.
Fixing rates and charges; determination of cost of production or transportation.
717e.
Ascertainment of cost of property.
717f.
Construction, extension, or abandonment of facilities.
717g.
Accounts; records; memoranda.
717h.
Rates of depreciation.
717i.
Periodic and special reports.
717j.
State compacts for conservation, transportation, etc., of natural gas.
717k.
Officials dealing in securities.
717 l.
Complaints.
717m.
Investigations by Commission.
717n.
Process coordination; hearings; rules of procedure.
717 o.
Administrative powers of Commission; rules, regulations, and orders.
717p.
Joint boards.
717q.
Appointment of officers and employees.
717r.
Rehearing and review.
717s.
Enforcement of chapter.
717t.
General penalties.
717t–1.
Civil penalty authority.
717t–2.
Natural gas market transparency rules.
717u.
Jurisdiction of offenses; enforcement of liabilities and duties.
717v.
Separability.
717w.
Short title.
717x.
Conserved natural gas.
717y.
Voluntary conversion of natural gas users to heavy fuel oil.
717z.
Emergency conversion of utilities and other facilities.
2015 Livestock Reinsurance Data 

National Totals 

As of 10/2019 

Gross Liability Gross Premium Gross Indemnity Retained Liability Retained Premium Retained Ind

1,293,339,778 32,818,645 29,236,538 665,297,551 16,679,549 14,2

Footnote: Amounts shown are for policies that have reached the Premium Billing Date according to the actuarial documents. 

Page 1 of 1
#### §§ 317.4-317.5 [Reserved]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7153

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

LOVANSA YOLANDA ROACH, a/k/a Blondie,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,

Chief District Judge. (CR-90-196, CA-97-594-2)

Submitted: January 21, 1999 Decided: February 9, 1999

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lovansa Yolanda Roach, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Francis Joseph,

Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Lovansa Yolanda Roach seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying her motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994

& Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. See United States v. Roach, Nos. CR-90-196;

CA-97-594-2 (M.D.N.C. July 13, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T PE TE R T . HA RR EL L, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. S O U T H E RN O R E G O N U N IV E R S IT Y ; et a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 09- 35992 D . C. N o . 1 : 0 8 - c v - 0 3 0 3 7 - CL ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

O r e gon O w e n M . P a nne r , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d M a y25, 2010 ** S a n F r a n c is c o , C a lif

o rn ia B efo re: C A N B Y , T H O M A S an dW . F L E T C H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P l ai nt i ff -app el l antP et erT . H arre l l appeal s pro se the di stri ctcourt ' s deni al o f h is r e q u e s t f

o rp r e lim in a ryin

ju n c tiv e r e lie f

a g a in s t d e f

e n d a n ts - ap p e lle e s in 

# FI LED JU N 04 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSc onne c t i on w i th appe l l a nt ' s c om pl a i ntf orc i vi l r i ght s vi ol a t i ons , pur s ua ntt o 42 U . S. C. § 1 9 8 3 . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 2 ( a ) ( 1 ) , a n dw e a f f i rm. W e e x p r e s s n o v ie w o n th e m e r its o f th e c o m p la in t. O u rs o le in q u iryis w he the rthe di s tr i c tc ourtabus e d i t s di s c r e t i on i n de ny i ng pr e l i m i na ryi nj unc t i ve r e lie f . T h e L a n d s C o u n c il v . McN

a ir , 53 7 F . 3d 98 1, 98 6 (9th C i r. 20 08 ); se e W in te rv . N a tu r a l R es o u r c es D e

fe n s e C o u n c il , - - - U . S . - - - - , - - - - , 129 S . C t . 365, 37 4, 17 2 L . E d. 2d 24 9 (20 08 ) ( l i st i ng fa ct ors f or di stri ctcourtt o con si der) ; S p o r ts Form , Inc. , 686 F . 2d 750, 752- 53 ( 9th C i r . 1982) ( e xpl a i ni ng l i m i t e d s c ope of rev i ew ). W e co n cl u d e th e d i stri ctco u rtd i dn o tab u se i t s d i scret i o n . A cco rd i n g l y, w e a f f i rm the di s tr i c tc ourt ' s or de rde ny i ng the pr e l i m i na ryi nj unc t i on. A FFI R M ED .
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           500
<OTHER-SE>                                       (500)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-126827) of Grupo Televisa, S. A. B. of our report dated April 28, 2017, except with respect to our opinion on internal control over financial reporting insofar as it relates to the effects of the matters described in the penultimate paragraph of Management’s Annual Report on Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting, as to which the date is February 14, 2018, relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 20-F/A.

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers S.C.

 

 
| /s/ Alberto Del   Castillo Velasco Vilchis    | ** ** |
|-----------------------------------------------|------------|
| L.C.C. Alberto Del   Castillo Velasco Vilchis | ** ** |
| Audit Partner                                 | ** ** |
| Mexico City                                   | ** ** |
| February 14,   2018                      | ** ** |

** **

----
# C_2007096EN.01002902.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/29

---

Order of the President of the Court of 19 March 2007 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus — Finland) — DNA Verkot Oy, intervener: Sonera Mobile Networks Oy, Viestintävirasto

(Case C-366/06) (1)

1

(2007/C 96/58)

Language of the case: Finnish

Language of the case: Finnish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 281, 18.11.2006.

1

---
Cite as 2016 Ark. 10

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

No. CR-15-899

ZACHARY HOLLY

APPELLANT

V.

STATE OF ARKANSAS

APPELLEE

Opinion Delivered January 14, 2016

APPEAL FROM THE BENTON 

COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT 

[NO. CR-2013-1-2]

HONORABLE BRAD KARREN, 

JUDGE

PETITION FOR WRIT OF 

CERTIORARI TO COMPLETE THE 

RECORD GRANTED.

PER CURIAM

 Kent McLemore, attorney for appellant, Zachary Holly, petitions this court under 

Ark. Sup.Ct. R. 3-5 to issue a writ of certiorari directing the court reporter, Sharon Fields, 

to complete the record in this case. Petitioner states that the court reporter notified him that 

she is unable to prepare the record by December 29, 2015, the extended deadline, which 

was seven months from the date of the entry of the judgment. Attorney McLemore filed 

this petition prior to the record’s due date asking this court to issue a writ of certiorari 

directing the court reporter to complete the record. Petitioner filed a partial record on 

November 4, 2015. Arkansas Rule of Appellate Procedure–Civil 5(b)(2) states, “In no event 

shall the time be extended more than seven (7) months from the date of the entry of the 

judgment or order . . . .”

We issue the writ of certiorari directing Ms. Sharon Fields to complete the record in 

this matter within thirty days from the date of this order. The Supreme Court Clerk is 
Cite as 2016 Ark. 10

2

directed to forward a copy of this per curiam to the Board of Certified Court Reporter 

Examiners for any action it may deem appropriate under its rules. See Epps v. State, 338 Ark. 

551, 998 S.W.2d 419 (1999). 

Petition for writ of certiorari to complete the record is granted.
### §1367. Repayments

Upon notice by the Secretary to any designated agency or participating institution that no further payments will be made pending substantial compliance, correction, or repayment under section 1366 of this title, any funds which may have been paid to such agency or institution under this chapter and which are not expended by the agency or institution on the date of such notice, shall be repaid to the Secretary and be deposited to the account of the appropriations from which they originally were paid.

(Pub. L. 89–182, §17, Sept. 14, 1965, 79 Stat. 684.)
### §3006. Civil action

#### (a) Parties; remedies

The host State, the host racing association, or the horsemen's group may commence a civil action against any person alleged to be in violation of this chapter, for injunctive relief to restrain violations and for damages in accordance with section 3005 of this title.

#### (b) Intervention

In any civil action under this section, the host State, the host racing association and horsemen's group, if not a party, shall be permitted to intervene as a matter of right.

#### (c) Limitations

A civil action may not be commenced pursuant to this section more than 3 years after the discovery of the alleged violation upon which such civil action is based.

#### (d) State as defendant

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to permit a State to be sued under this section other than in accordance with its applicable laws.

(Pub. L. 95–515, §7, Oct. 25, 1978, 92 Stat. 1814.)
Exhibit
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1250,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the quarterly report of Power3 Medical Products, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed
      with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Steven B. Rash, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best
      of
      my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





The
      Report fully compiles with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
              January 23, 2007
            
            /s/
              Steven B. RashSteven B. RashChairman and Chief Executive
              OfficerPower3 Medical Products,
              Inc.
**Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 20 September 2011 – Meica v OHIM – TofuTown.com (TOFUKING)**

**(Case T-99/10)**

Community trade mark – Opposition procedure – Application for the Community trade mark TOFUKING – Earlier national word mark King – Earlier national and Community word marks Curry King – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009

Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services
– Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 21, 31-35, 44-49)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 7 January 2010 (Case R 63/2009-4) concerning opposition proceedings between Meica Ammerländische Fleischwarenfabrik Fritz Meinen GmbH & Co KG and TofuTown.com GmbH. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 7 January 2010 (Case R 63/2009-4); |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and those incurred by Meica Ammerländische Fleischwarenfabrik Fritz Meinen GmbH & Co KG; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3. | | Orders TofuTown.com GmbH to bear its own costs. |
§ 111.32 How will the Commission notify respondents of a reason to believe finding and a proposed civil money penalty? If the Commission determines, by an affirmative vote of at least four (4) of its members, that it has reason to believe that a respondent has violated 52 U.S.C. 30104(a), the Chairman or Vice-Chairman shall notify such respondent of the Commission's finding. The written notification shall set forth the following: ( a ) The alleged factual and legal basis supporting the finding including the type of report that was due, the filing deadline, the actual date filed (if filed), and the number of days the report was late (if filed);
( b ) The applicable schedule of penalties;
( c ) The number of times the respondent has been assessed a civil money penalty under this subpart during the current two-year election cycle and the prior two-year election cycle;
( d ) The amount of the proposed civil money penalty based on the schedules of penalties set forth in 11 CFR 111.43 or 111.44; and
( e ) An explanation of the respondent's right to challenge both the reason to believe finding and the proposed civil money penalty.
[65 FR 31794, May 19, 2000, as amended at 79 FR 77848, Dec. 29, 2014]
# STATE OFLOUISIANA

COURTOFAPPEAL,FIRSTCIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS ABDELLATIF DEVOL NO. 

### 2022 KW 0257 

### JULY 5, 2022 In Re: Abdellatif Devol, applying 

## for supervisory writs, 19th Judicial District 

### Court, Parish of East Baton 

### Rouge, No. 

### 12- 14- 0663. BEFORE: McCLENDON, WELCH, AND HESTER, JJ.

WRIT DENIED. PMC JEW CHH

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT



### DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT