alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# 5.1 Continuing Calibration Data

Maxxam Analytics International

6740 Campobello Rd.

Mississauga, Ontario, Canada

L5N 2L8

1-800-668-0639

www.maxxamanalytics.com

# 5.2 QA/QC Data

DB-225 Confirmation

Maxxam Analytics International

6740 Campobello Rd.

Mississauga, Ontario, Canada

L5N 2L8

1-800-668-0639

www.maxxamanalytics.com

# 4.4 Run and Prep log

Maxxam Analytics International

6740 Campobello Rd

Mississauga, Ontario, Canada

L5N 2L8

1-800-668-0639

www.maxxamanalytics.com

# This is the last page of the report and is intentionally left blank

Maxxam Analytics International

6740 Campobello Rd.

Mississauga, Ontario, Canada

L5N 2L8

1-800-668-0639

www.maxxamanalytics.com

# Method 1668A

– 

# Chlorinated Biphenyl

Congeners in Water, Soil, Sediment,

Tissue and Air by HRGC/HRMS

Maxxam Analytics International

6740 Campobello Rd.

Mississauga, Ontario, Canada

L5N 2L8

1-800-668-0639

www.maxxamanalytics.com

# 5.3 Sample Chromatograms

Maxxam Analytics International

6740 Campobello Rd.

Mississauga, Ontario, Canada

L5N 2L8

1-800-668-0639

www.maxxamanalytics.com
§ 37.61 Results of compliance determination. ( a ) A State shall be deemed in compliance with this part when DHS issues a determination that the State meets the requirements of this part.
( b ) The Secretary will determine that a State is not in compliance with this part when it— ( 1 ) Fails to submit a timely certification or request an extension as prescribed in this subpart; or
( 2 ) Does not meet one or more of the standards of this part, as established in a determination by DHS under § 37.59.
Exhibit 13.1



Section 906 Certification



The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the
Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.



Jorge Carlos Bledel, the Chief Executive Officer and Marcelo Gustavo
Canestri, the Chief Financial Officer of BBVA Banco Francés S.A., each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of BBVA Banco Francés S.A.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



June 27, 2005



/s/ Jorge Carlos BledelName: Jorge Carlos BledelChief Executive Officer/s/ Marcelo Gustavo CanestriName: Marcelo Gustavo CanestriChief Financial Officer
### §1507c. Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere; duties; appointment; compensation

There shall be in the Department of Commerce, in addition to the Assistant Secretaries of Commerce provided by law before November 14, 1986, one additional Assistant Secretary of Commerce who shall have the title Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere and shall serve as the Deputy Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration established by Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1970 [5 U.S.C. App.] and perform such duties and functions as the Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere shall prescribe. The Assistant Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere shall be appointed by the President by and with the advice and consent of the Senate and shall be compensated at the rate now or hereafter provided for Level IV of the Executive Schedule Pay Rates (5 U.S.C. 5315).

(Pub. L. 99–659, title IV, §407(b), Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3739.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1970, referred to in text, is set out under section 1511 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Service by Incumbent Administrator and Deputy Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

Individuals serving on Nov. 14, 1986, as Deputy Administrator of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to also serve as Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere, until successor is appointed, see section 407(c)(B) of Pub. L. 99–659, set out as a note under section 1503b of this title.
#### Samuel Karp and Others, Appellants, v. Frederick F. Brewster and Others, as Directors of the Prosperity Real Estate Company of New York, a Domestic Corporation, etc., and Others, Respondents.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion,
# C_2007082EN.01002804.xml

| 14.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/28

---

Order of the President of the Court of 15 February 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-299/06) (1)

1

(2007/C 82/60)

Language of the case: Greek

Language of the case: Greek

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 212, 2.9.2006.

1

---
§ 22.7 Copies and Service Thereof [Rule 7]. ( a ) *Rule 4 file.* For documents provided pursuant to § 22.4 of this part [Rule 4], the original and one copy shall be provided to the Board, and one copy shall be provided to each party. Documents shall be provided by hand delivery, express or priority mail, or approved commercial carrier (e.g., UPS or FedEx); first class and parcel post mail are not permitted unless authorized by the Board.
( b ) *Other submissions filed with the Board.* Except as otherwise authorized by the Board, all correspondence and submissions, other than documents provided pursuant to § 22.4 of this part [Rule 4] and appeals filed under § 22.3(c) of this part [Rule 3(c)], shall be provided to the Board by e-mail at *cab@gao.gov*, with a courtesy copy of the submission provided by e-mail to each of the members of the Board. All e-mails to *cab@gao.gov* must identify the case name and docket number in the subject line of the e-mail. In addition, unless the Board directs otherwise, the original plus 3 copies of the e-mailed submission also shall be provided to the Board by hand delivery, express or priority mail, or approved commercial carrier (e.g., UPS or FedEx) within 2 business days of the e-mailed filing (except that the original and one copy are required for appeals involving small claims or using accelerated procedures). Delivery to the Board by first class or parcel post mail is not permitted. However, the Board may at any time modify the number of copies required or authorize alternative methods of delivery to the Board.
( c ) *Service on parties.* All correspondence and submissions to the Board must be provided to all other parties using the same method of service as used for the Board, or an equal or more expeditious method of service. Except for documents provided pursuant to § 22.4 of this part [Rule 4], e-mail service is preferred. However, where the parties agree to other methods of service, such other methods of service to parties are permitted.
( d ) *Proof of service.* A party sending a document to the Board must represent to the Board that a copy has been sent to the other parties, identify the date on which service was made, and identify the method of delivery used. This may be done by certificate of service, by notation of a photostatic copy (cc:), or by any other means that can reasonably be expected to show the Board that the other party has been provided a copy, the date on which the copy was provided, and the method of delivery used to provide the copy. Proof of service must be provided to the Board at the time of filing. If proof of service is not provided, the Board may decline to consider the document in the appeal.
# C_2012184EN.01001002.xml

| 23.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 184/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 184/10

---

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 May 2012 — Yoshida Metal Industry v OHIM — Pi-Design and Others (Representation of a triangular surface with black dots)

(Case T-331/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Figurative Community trade mark representing a surface with black dots - Shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result - Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2012/C 184/17

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Yoshida Metal Industry Co. Ltd (Tsubame-shi, Japan) (represented by: S. Verea, K. Muraro and M. Balestriero, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Pi-Design AG (Triengen, Switzerland), Bodum France (Neuilly-sur-Seine, France) and Bodum Logistics A/S (Billund, Denmark) (represented by H. Pernez, lawyer)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 May 2010 (Case R 1235/2008-1), relating to invalidity proceedings between Pi-Design AG, Bodum France and Bodum Logistics A/S, on the one hand, and Yoshida Metal Industry Co. Ltd, on the other hand

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 20 May 2010 (Case R 1235/2008-1); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 20 May 2010 (Case R 1235/2008-1);

| 2. | Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay the costs of Yoshida Metal Industry Co. Ltd; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay the costs of Yoshida Metal Industry Co. Ltd;

| 3. | Orders Pi-Design AG, Bodum France and Bodum Logistics A/S to bear their own respective costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Pi-Design AG, Bodum France and Bodum Logistics A/S to bear their own respective costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 274, 9.10.2010.

1

---
### §1608. Views of other agencies

In the exercise of its functions under this subchapter, the Bureau may obtain upon requests the views of any other Federal agency which, in the judgment of the Bureau, exercises regulatory or supervisory functions with respect to any class of creditors subject to this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 90–321, title I, §109, May 29, 1968, 82 Stat. 150; Pub. L. 111–203, title X, §1100A(2), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 2107.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2010—Pub. L. 111–203 substituted "Bureau" for "Board" in two places.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2010 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 111–203 effective on the designated transfer date, see section 1100H of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as a note under section 552a of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
#   Behavioral Health Barometer: Oklahoma, Volume 6

Behavioral Health Barometer: Oklahoma, Volume 6

National Survey on Drug Use and Health

### Part of Collection:

Behavioral Health Barometer: State Barometers, Volume 6

                        -  View/Download Files 
                        -  Other Related Reports 
                        -  Report Resources 

### View/Download Files

                                    - Oklahoma-BH-Barometer_Volume6(pdf | 975.81 KB)

### Other Related Reports

Behavioral Health Barometer: Alabama, Volume 6

Collected Date: 2012-2019 | Published Date: December 28, 2020 | Type: National Survey on Drug Use and Health

Behavioral Health Barometer: Alaska, Volume 6

Collected Date: 2012-2019 | Published Date: December 28, 2020 | Type: National Survey on Drug Use and Health

Behavioral Health Barometer: Arizona, Volume 6

Collected Date: 2012-2019 | Published Date: December 28, 2020 | Type: National Survey on Drug Use and Health

Behavioral Health Barometer: Arkansas, Volume 6

Collected Date: 2012-2019 | Published Date: December 28, 2020 | Type: National Survey on Drug Use and Health

Behavioral Health Barometer: California, Volume 6

Collected Date: 2012-2019 | Published Date: December 28, 2020 | Type: National Survey on Drug Use and Health

Behavioral Health Barometer: Colorado, Volume 6

Collected Date: 2012-2019 | Published Date: December 28, 2020 | Type: National Survey on Drug Use and Health

Behavioral Health Barometer: Connecticut, Volume 6

Collected Date: 2012-2019 | Published Date: December 28, 2020 | Type: National Survey on Drug Use and Health

Behavioral Health Barometer: Delaware, Volume 6

Collected Date: 2012-2019 | Published Date: December 28, 2020 | Type: National Survey on Drug Use and Health

Behavioral Health Barometer: District of Columbia, Volume 6

Collected Date: 2012-2019 | Published Date: December 28, 2020 | Type: National Survey on Drug Use and Health

Behavioral Health Barometer: Florida, Volume 6

Collected Date: 2012-2019 | Published Date: December 28, 2020 | Type: National Survey on Drug Use and Health

#### Pagination

-  Current page1 
-  Page2 
-  Page3 
-  Page4 
-  Page5 
-  Next pageNext 

### Report Resources

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Data Archive (SAMHDA)'s page about NSDUH.

 < Back to Main content
1250 Connecticut Ave., NW • Suite 825 • Washington, DC 20005 • 202

- 557

- 4180 www.interactivetravel.org 

## Interactive Travel Services Association Our companies are your gateway to the world . . .

August 7, 2012

To	Members	of	t he	Advisory	Committee	for	Aviation	Consumer	Protection,

On	behalf	of	the	Interactive	Travel	Services	Association ( ITSA ) ,	thank	you	for	providing the travel	distribution	industry with	the	opportunity	to	discuss the	proliferation	of	ancillary	fees and	their	impact	on the aviation	consumer

. We	appreciate	the	Committee’s	interest	in	this important	issue.		As I	noted	in	my	app earance	before	this	Committee	on June	27,	2012

, most airlines	refuse	to	distribute	ancillary	fee	information	through independent distribution channels like	those	who	make	up	ITSA’s	membership.		This	has	a	significant	negative	impact	on
consumers	of	air	tra vel,	who because	of	carriers’	predilection	towards	opaque	pricing	strategies have	no	way of	knowing what	the	all

- in	cost	of	a given flight	is	going	to	be.		W e	urge	this Committee	to	strongly	support a proposal	to	require	airlines	to	provide	core	ancillary fee	data
to	their	chosen	distribution	channels.

Sabre	Holdings ,	one	of	ITSA’s	founding	members, is providing	a live presentation today that demonstrates	the	capability of travel distributors to display and sell airline	ancillary	fees. ITSA’s other	GDS	members,	Amadeus	and	Travelport,	similarly	are	capable	of	displaying	and	booking ancillary	fee	offerings.		I	have	taken	the	liberty	of	attaching	descriptions	of	their	products	to	this submission,	and	note	that	both	companies	are	available to	demonstrate	their	individual technologies	at	the	behest	of	any	member	of	this	Committee.

Thank	you	for	your	time	and	interest	in	this	important	issue.

Sincerely,

Joseph	Rubin,
President
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 4407

_____________________________ A DRIAN B. W YNN , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for D uval County

. Mark Borello , Judge

. January 16, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
R OWE , R AY , and O STERHAUS , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

______ _______________________2 Adrian B. Wynn, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley Brooke Moody , Attorney General, and Anne Conley
, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
#### § 592.80 Political activity.

All inspection program personnel are forbidden during the period of their respective appointments, to take an active part in political management or in political campaigns. Political activity in city, county, State, or national elections, whether primary or regular, or in behalf of any party or candidate is prohibited, except as authorized by law or regulation of the Department. This applies to all appointees, including, but not being limited to, temporary and cooperative employees and employees on leave of absence with or without pay. Willful violation of this section will constitute grounds for dismissal.
### SUBCHAPTER IV—LABELING OF FUR PRODUCTS
# C_2012049EN.01002401.xml

| 18.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 49/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 49/24

---

Order of the General Court of 16 December 2011 — Stichting Woonpunt and Others v Commission

(Case T-203/10) (1)

1

(State aid - Scheme of aid granted by the Netherlands to housing corporations - Existing aid - Decision accepting Member State’s commitments - Decision declaring new aid compatible - Action for annulment - Not individually concerned - No interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility)

2012/C 49/43

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Stichting Woonpunt (Beek, Netherlands); Stichting Com.wonen (Rotterdam, Netherlands); Woningstichting Haag Wonen (The Hague, Netherlands); and Stichting Woonbedrijf SWS.Hhvl (Eindhoven, Netherlands) (represented by: P. Glazener, E. Henny and T. Ottervanger, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: H. van Vliet, S. Noë and S. Thomas, Agents, and by H. Gilliams, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 9963 final of 15 December 2009 relating to State aid E 2/2005 and N 642/2009 (Netherlands) — Existing and special project aid to housing corporations.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible;

| 2. | There is no need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene of Vesteda Groep BV and the Netherlands Vereniging van Institutionele Beleggers in Vastgoed; |
| --- | --- |

2.

There is no need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene of Vesteda Groep BV and the Netherlands Vereniging van Institutionele Beleggers in Vastgoed;

| 3. | Stichting Woonpunt, Stichting Com.wonen, Woningstichting Haag Wonen and Stichting Woonbedrijf SWS.Hhvl are ordered to bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Stichting Woonpunt, Stichting Com.wonen, Woningstichting Haag Wonen and Stichting Woonbedrijf SWS.Hhvl are ordered to bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 4. | Vesteda Groep and the Netherlands Vereniging van Institutionele Beleggers in Vastgoed, applicants for leave to intervene, are ordered to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Vesteda Groep and the Netherlands Vereniging van Institutionele Beleggers in Vastgoed, applicants for leave to intervene, are ordered to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 179, 3.7.2010.

1

---
EXHIBIT 10.14



C&F FINANCIAL CORPORATION



SCHEDULE OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS ANNUAL COMPENSATION



Effective December 21, 2004



|                             |  |        |       |             
|---------------------------- |  | ------ | ----- | ------------
|                             |  | Amount |      
|Retainer Fees(1)             |  |        |       |             
|Service as a Director        |  | $      | 6,000 |             
|Service as a Committee Chair |  | $      | 1,600 | (additional)
|                             | 
|Meeting Fees(2)              |  |        |       |             
|Base per day                 |  | $      | 500   |             
|Secondary meeting(s) per day |  | $      | 250   |             

---

|(1) | The retainer fees are payable in quarterly installments.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | All non-employee directors receive a base meeting fee of $500 per day for Corporation board, Bank board or committee meeting attendance and a fee of $250 for
secondary meeting attendance for each additional Corporation board, Bank board or committee meeting held on the same day as a meeting for which the base meeting fee is paid.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# C_2012133EN.01002801.xml

| 5.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 133/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 133/28

---

Order of the General Court of 19 March 2012 — Poland v Commission

(Case T-101/10) (1)

1

2012/C 133/55

Language of the case: Polish

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  C 113, 1.5.2010.

1

---
-  Home 

# BTS News

## 	BTS News

### 	2003

                      -  Volume 2 Issue 2 (Spring 2003)
                      -  Volume 2 Issue 1 (Winter 2003)

### 	2002

                      -  Volume 1 Issue 3 (Fall 2002)
                      -  Volume 1 Issue 2 (Summer 2002 )
                      -  Volume 1 Issue 1 (Spring 2002)
#### John H. Bosworth, Respondent, v. The Nassau Electric Railroad Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Present — Woodward, Jenks, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ.
# C_2017392EN.01002701.xml

| 20.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 392/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 392/27

---

Order of the General Court of 13 September 2017 — Germany v Commission

(Case T-21/10) (1)

1

((Action for annulment - ERDF - Reduction in financial aid - Failure to comply with the time limit for adoption of a decision - Infringement of essential procedural requirements - Action manifestly well founded))

(2017/C 392/33)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented initially by: J. Möller, T. Henze and C. Blaschke, and subsequently by: J. Möller and T. Henze, acting as Agents, and C. von Donat, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B.-R. Killmann, B. Conte and A. Steiblytė, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 9049 of 13 November 2009 reducing the assistance granted to the Single Programming Document Objective 2 Saarland (1997-1999) in the Federal Republic of Germany from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) under Commission Decision C(97)1123 of 7 May 1997.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | Commission Decision C(2009) 9049 of 13 November 2009 reducing the assistance granted to the Single Programming Document Objective 2 Saarland (1997-1999) in the Federal Republic of Germany from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) under Commission Decision C(97)1123 of 7 May 1997 is annulled. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Commission Decision C(2009) 9049 of 13 November 2009 reducing the assistance granted to the Single Programming Document Objective 2 Saarland (1997-1999) in the Federal Republic of Germany from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) under Commission Decision C(97)1123 of 7 May 1997 is annulled.

| 2. | The European Commission shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Commission shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 100, 17.4.2010.

1

---