alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

Rural Development Kicks Off Innovation Month with First-Time National Lender Forum

WASHINGTON, June 13, 2018 – Assistant to the Secretary for Rural Development Anne Hazlett on 

Tuesday convened lender and financial partners at the Rural Development National Lender Forum to strengthen 

public-private partnerships and expand access to capital in rural communities using a OneRD approach.

USDA Deputy Secretary Stephen Censky, Rural Development agency administrators and other senior 

program executives joined Hazlett to share ideas on how to better co-finance rural economic development needs

by strengthening collaboration with lending partners.

In support of Innovation Month, the Rural Development Innovation Center organized and facilitated this 

event to enable a diversity of lender partners to begin strategic dialogue on issues of mutual interest. Participant 

ideas included:

• establishing creative financing;

• streamlining regulation;

• modernizing processes and;

• developing joint education and outreach of program resources

The Innovation Center will use these ideas to inform future solutions that support USDA’s priorities in 

improving customer experience. The forum will help drive additional public-private partnerships that increase 

opportunity to leverage resources that maximize limited financing.

The forum included representatives from National Cooperative Bank, credit unions, community banks, stateregulated bond banks, mortgage lenders, capital markets, community development financial institutions, and

Farm Credit systems such as CoBank.

For more information on the Rural Development Innovation Center, visit www.usda.gov/rdinnovation.

#
# C_2013108EN.01000402.xml

| 13.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/4

---

Order of the Court of 13 December 2012 — Alliance One International Inc. v European Commission

(Case C-593/11 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Competition - Agreements, decisions or concerted practices - Italian market for the purchase and first processing of raw tobacco - Price-fixing and market-sharing - Attributability of unlawful conduct of subsidiaries to their parent companies - Presumption of innocence - Rights of defence - Obligation to state reasons)

2013/C 108/07

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Alliance One International Inc. (represented by: G. Mastrantonio, avvocato)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: E. Gippini Fournier, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 9 September 2011 in Case T-25/06 Alliance One International v Commission dismissing an action for annulment in part of Commission Decision 2006/901/EC of 20 October 2005 relating to a proceeding under Article 81(1) of the EC Treaty (Case COMP/C.38.281/B.2 — Raw tobacco — Italy) (notified under document number C(2005) 4012) (OJ 2006 L 353, p. 45) concerning a cartel designed to fix prices paid to producers and other intermediaries and to share suppliers in the Italian raw tobacco market, and reduction of the fine imposed on the appellant.

Alliance One International

Commission

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Alliance One International Inc. shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Alliance One International Inc. shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 25, 28.1.2012.

1

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 88 (Monday, May 7, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 26814]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-10979]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7870]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Modern Landscapes''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Modern Landscapes,'' imported from abroad 
for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural 
significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with 
the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition 
or display of the exhibit objects at the Pennsylvania Academy of the 
Fine Arts, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, from on or about June 12, 2012 
until on or about September 16, 2012, and at possible additional 
exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national 
interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be 
published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), and Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: May 2, 2012.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-10979 Filed 5-4-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
§ 94.14 Swine from regions where swine vesicular disease exists; importations prohibited. ( a ) Swine vesicular disease is known to exist in all regions of the world except those listed under § 94.12(a) of this part. No swine which are moved from or transit any region in which swine vesicular disease is known to exist may be imported into the United States except wild swine imported in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) Wild swine may be allowed importation into the United States by the Administrator upon request in specific cases under § 93.501 or § 93.504(c) of this chapter.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0040) [54 FR 7395, Feb. 21, 1989, as amended at 55 FR 31558, Aug. 2, 1990; 59 FR 67134, Dec. 29, 1994; 62 FR 56023, Oct. 28, 1997; 77 FR 1394, Jan. 10, 2012]
§ 390.5 Request for records. ( a ) The FOIA Coordinator of FSIS is authorized to receive requests and to exercise authority under 7 CFR 1.3(a) to— ( 1 ) Make determinations to grant or deny such requests,
( 2 ) Extend the 20-day deadline,
( 3 ) Make discretionary releases of exempt records, except where disclosure is specifically prohibited by Executive Order, statute, and applicable regulations,
( 4 ) Consider expedited processing when appropriate,
( 5 ) Make determinations regarding the charging of fees pursuant to the established schedule, and
( 6 ) Determine the applicability of 7 CFR 1.5 to requests for records.
( b ) Requests for FSIS records or information will be made in writing in accordance with 7 CFR 1.5 and submitted to the FSIS Freedom of Information Act Coordinator at the following address: Freedom of Information Act Coordinator (FOIA Request), Food Safety and Inspection Service, Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC 20250-3700
The submitter will identify each record with reasonable specificity as prescribed in 7 CFR 1.3. All requests to inspect or obtain copies of any record or to obtain a fee waiver must be submitted in writing.
( c ) In exercising authority under 7 CFR 1.3(a)(3) to grant and deny requests, the Coordinator or designee will comply with subsection (b) of the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552(b)), as amended, which requires that any reasonably segregated portion of a document will be provided to a person requesting the document after deletion of any portions within the scope of the request for which an exemption is being claimed under the Act. Therefore, unless the disclosable and nondisclosable portions are so inextricably linked that it is not reasonably possible to separate them, the document will be released with the nondisclosable portions deleted. The Coordinator or designee may exercise discretion as limited by 7 CFR l.15 to release the entire document or make only a minimum number of deletions. If portions of a document in electronic format have been redacted, the Agency must indicate, on the released portion of the document, the amount of information that has been deleted from a record, unless that indication would harm an interest protected by an applicable exemption.
#### § 16.15 Commission recommendation to Congress.

Upon receipt of a recommendation from any Federal department or agency, a proposal of any party, or on the Commission's own motion, and after notice and opportunity for hearing, the Commission may determine that a project may be taken over by the United States, issue an order on its findings and recommendations, and forward a copy to Congress.
§ 201.4 Rulemaking proceedings and advisory opinions: Ex parte contacts reported. ( a ) A Commissioner or member of a Commissioner's staff who receives an ex parte communication concerning any rulemaking or advisory opinion during the period described in paragraph (b) of this section shall, as soon after the communication as is reasonably possible but no later than three business days after the communication unless special circumstances make this impracticable, or prior to the next Commission discussion of the matter, whichever is earlier, provide a copy of a written communication or a written summary of an oral communication to the Commission Secretary for placement in the public file of the rulemaking or advisory opinion. The Commissioner or staff member shall advise any person making an oral communication that a written summary of the conversation will be made part of the public record.
( b ) The requirements of paragraph (a) of this section apply: ( 1 ) In the case of a rulemaking proceeding, from the date a petition for rulemaking is circulated to Commissioners' offices, or the date on which a proposed rulemaking document is first circulated to the Commission or placed on an agenda of a Commission public meeting, through final Commission action on that rulemaking.
( 2 ) In the case of an advisory opinion, from the date a request for an advisory opinion is circulated to Commissioner's offices through the date on which the advisory opinion is issued, and during any period of reconsideration pursuant to 11 CFR 112.6.
# C_2013129EN.01001701.xml

| 4.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/17

---

Judgment of the General Court of 22 March 2013 — Fabryka Łożysk Tocznych-Kraśnik v OHIM (FŁT-1)

(Case T-571/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark FŁT-1 - Earlier Community figurative mark FŁT - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2013/C 129/32

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Fabryka Łożysk Tocznych-Kraśnik S.A. (Kraśnik, Poland) (represented by: J. Sieklucki, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: K. Zajfert, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Impexmetal S.A. (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: K. Pyszków, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 6 October 2010 (Case R 1387/2009-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Impexmetal S.A. and Fabryka Łożysk Tocznych-Kraśnik S.A.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Fabryka Łożysk Tocznych-Kraśnik S.A. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Fabryka Łożysk Tocznych-Kraśnik S.A. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 63, 26.2.2011.

1

---
# C_2010346EN.01005002.xml

| 18.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 346/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 346/50

---

Action brought on 4 October 2010 — Département du Gers v Commission

(Case T-480/10)

()

2010/C 346/97

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Département du Gers (Auch, France) (represented by: S. Mabile and J.-P. Mignard, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | annul Decision 2010/426/EU of the European Commission of 28 July 2010 authorising the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize Bt11xGA21 (SYN-BTØ11-1xMON-ØØØ21-9) pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Decision 2010/426/EU of the European Commission of 28 July 2010 authorising the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize Bt11xGA21 (SYN-BTØ11-1xMON-ØØØ21-9) pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and the main arguments raised by the applicant are identical or essentially the same as those raised in Case T-478/10 Département du Gers v Commission.

Département du Gers

Commission

---
Exhibit 32
                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                           --------------------------
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             ----------------------


In connection with the Annual Report of Unitronix Corporation (the
"registrant") on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"), we, Dale
M. Hendrick and William C. Wimer, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, respectively, of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, that to our knowledge:

(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the report presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.

Date: September 28, 2004


/s/Dale M. Hendrick
-------------------
Dale M. Hendrick
Chief Executive Officer


/s/William C. Wimer
-------------------
William C. Wimer
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
23.1
 
 
 
 Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
 
 Glimcher
Realty Trust
 Columbus,
Ohio
  We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-3 (Nos. 333-87538, 333-153257, 33-90730, 33-91084, 333-43317,
333-155720,  333-61339 and 333-115068), Form S-11 (No. 33-69740) and
Form S-8 (Nos. 33-94542, 333-10221, 333-84537, 333-123557 and 333-143237) of
Glimcher Realty Trust of our reports dated February 20, 2009 relating to the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule, and the
effectiveness of Glimcher Realty Trust’s internal control over financial
reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.
 
 
 /s/ BDO
Seidman, LLP
 
 Chicago,
Illinois
 February
20, 2009
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

(X)   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

      For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2013

                                             or

( )   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______ to _______

Commission file number        0-17679
BOSTON CAPITAL TAX CREDIT FUND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Notice of Solicitation for Applications for the Community Connect 

Grant Program for Fiscal Year 2015

(December 17, 2014) – Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack announced today that USDA is 

soliciting applications for Fiscal Year (FY) 2015 for the Community Connect Grant Program. 

The program provides grants to establish broadband in rural communities where it is currently 

not available, and where it can have a tremendous positive impact on the quality of life for rural 

residents.

The minimum amount of grants awarded will be $100,000; the maximum is $3,000,000. The 

deadline for applications to be submitted is February 17, 2015. For additional details and 

information on how to apply, see pages 75120-75124 of the December 17 Federal Register.

#

USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. To file a complaint of discrimination, write: USDA, Office of

the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, Office of Adjudication, 1400 Independence Ave., SW, Washington, DC

20250-9410 or call (866) 632-9992 (Toll-free Customer Service), (800) 877-8339 (Local or Federal relay), (866)

377-8642 (Relay voice users).
#### § 72.12 Cattle; exposure to tick infestation after treatment or inspection prohibited.

The cattle shall not be exposed to tick infestation after treatment and/or inspection.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

                    The Director of the National Science Foundation has determined that the establishment of the U.S. Antarctic Program Blue Ribbon Panel is necessary and in the public interest in connection with the performance of duties imposed upon the National Science Foundation (NSF), by 42 U.S.C. 1861*et seq.*                     This determination follows consultation with the Committee Management Secretariat, General Services Administration.                

*Name of Committee:*                     U.S. Antarctic Program Blue Ribbon Panel (#76826).                

*Purpose:*                     The Panel will conduct an independent review of the current U.S. Antarctic Program to ensure the nation is pursing the best twenty-year trajectory for conducting science and diplomacy in Antarctica. The Panel will aim to identify and characterize a range of options for supporting and implementing the required national scientific endeavors, international collaborations and strong U.S. presence in Antarctica. The Panel will examine the appropriate amount of R&D and complementary scientific activities needed to make Antarctic activities most productive and affordable over the long term, as well as appropriate opportunities for international collaboration.                

*Responsible NSF Official:*                     Karl Erb, Director, Office of Polar Programs, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230.                     *Telephone:*                     703/292-8030.                

 Dated: March 9, 2011.

Susanne Bolton,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2011-5734 Filed 3-11-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
§ 157.53 Testing. ( a ) Construction and operation of facilities necessary to render direct natural gas service for use in the testing and purging of new natural gas pipeline facilities are exempted from the certificate requirements of section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act, when the construction and operation of such facilities are conducted in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) Operations undertaken to render direct natural gas service shall be terminated upon the completion of the purging or testing of the pipeline facilities. Persons undertaking any construction or operation of facilities or service under this section shall file an original and two copies of an annual statement, by February 1 of each year, describing their activities hereunder.
[43 FR 56544, Dec. 1, 1978, as amended at 60 FR 53065, Oct. 11, 1995]
§ 1304.4 Application review and approval process. ( a ) TVA shall notify the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and other federal agencies with jurisdiction over the application as appropriate.
( b ) If a hearing is held for any of the reasons described in paragraph (c) of this section, any interested person may become a party of record by following the directions contained in the hearing notice.
( c ) Hearings concerning approval of applications are conducted (in accordance with § 1304.5) when: ( 1 ) TVA deems a hearing is necessary or appropriate in determining any issue presented by the application;
( 2 ) A hearing is required under any applicable law or regulation;
( 3 ) A hearing is requested by the USACE pursuant to the TVA/Corps joint processing Memorandum of Understanding; or
( 4 ) The TVA Investigating Officer directs that a hearing be held.
( d ) Upon completion of the review of the application, including any hearing or hearings, the Vice President or the designee thereof shall issue an initial decision approving or disapproving the application. The basis for the decision shall be set forth in the decision.
( e ) Promptly following the issuance of the decision, the Vice President or the designee thereof shall furnish a written copy of the decision to the applicant and to any parties of record. The initial decision shall become final unless an appeal is made pursuant to § 1304.6.
[79 FR 4621, Jan. 29, 2014]