alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012073EN.01001002.xml

| 10.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 73/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 73/10

---

Order of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 25 November 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (Chancery Division) — United Kingdom) — Daiichi Sankyo Company v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks

(Case C-6/11) (1)

1

(Article 104(3), first subparagraph, of the Rules of Procedure - Medicinal products for human use - Supplementary protection certificate - Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 - Articles 3 and 4 - Conditions for obtaining a certificate - Concept of a ‘product protected by a basic patent in force’ - Criteria - Existence of further or different criteria for a medicinal product comprising more than one active ingredient)

2012/C 73/17

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Referring court

High Court of Justice (Chancery Division)

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Daiichi Sankyo Company

Applicant:

Defendant: Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — High Court of Justice (Chancery Division, Patents Court) — Interpretation of Articles 3(a) and 4 of Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 concerning the supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products (OJ 2009 L 152, p. 1) — Conditions for obtaining a certificate — Concept of a ‘product protected by a basic patent in force’ — Criteria — Existence of further or different criteria for a medicinal product comprising more than one active ingredient

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

Article 3(a) of Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 concerning the supplementary protection certificate for medicinal products must be interpreted as precluding the competent industrial property office of a Member State from granting a supplementary protection certificate relating to active ingredients which are not identified in the wording of the claims of the basic patent relied on in support of the application for such a certificate.

---

(1)  OJ C 63, 26.2.2011.

1

---
Order entered November 28, 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 18 - 00901 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF M .M., A CHILD On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

Kaufman C ounty, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 97410CC



### O RDER Before the Court is the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services November 27, 201 8 motion for extension of time to file brief

. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief be filed no later than Dece mber 18, 2018. We caution that further extension requests will be disfavored.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
§ 4.2 Performance appraisal. ( a ) The GAO shall develop one or more performance appraisal systems which provide for periodic appraisals of job performance of employees; encourages employee participation in establishing performance standards; and uses the results of performance appraisal as a basis for training, rewarding, reassigning, promoting, reducing in grade, retaining, and removing employees.
( b ) Each performance appraisal system shall provide for— ( 1 ) Establishing performance standards which will, to the maximum extent feasible, permit the accurate evaluation of job performance on the basis of job-related criteria (which may include the extent of courtesy demonstrated to the public) for each GAO employee.
( 2 ) As soon as practicable, but not later than October 1, 1981, with respect to initial appraisal periods, and thereafter at the beginning of each following appraisal period, communicating to reach GAO employee the performance standards and the critical elements of the employee's position.
( 3 ) Annually evaluating each employee during the appraisal period on such standards.
( 4 ) Recognizing and rewarding employees whose performance so warrants.
( 5 ) Assisting employees in improving unacceptable performance.
( 6 ) Reassigning, reducing in grade, or removing employees who continue to have unacceptable performance but only after an opportunity to demonstrate acceptable performance.
§ 82.23 Issuance of permits. ( a ) Application for the permit required by this subpart to move vehicles, cages, coops, containers, troughs, or other equipment interstate must be in writing, and must be submitted to a Federal representative or State representative. The application must include the following: ( 1 ) The applicant's name and mailing address;
( 2 ) The name and mailing address of the person who will receive the items;
( 3 ) The addresses of both the origin and destination of the items;
( 4 ) The number and types of items intended for interstate movement; and
( 5 ) The reason for the interstate movement.
( b ) *Exceptions.* This subpart does not apply to the interstate movement of poultry, vehicles, cages, coops, containers, troughs, or other equipment or material if the interstate movement is made by the United States Department of Agriculture for the purposes of research or diagnosis.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0116)
§ 590.146 Survey and grant of inspection. ( a ) Before inspection is granted, FSIS will survey the official plant to determine if the construction and facilities of the plant are in accordance with the regulations in this part. FSIS will grant inspection, subject to § 500.7 of this chapter, when these requirements are met and the requirements contained in § 590.149 are met.
( b ) FSIS will give notice in writing to each applicant granted inspection and will specify in the notice the official plant, including the limits of the plant's premises, to which the grant pertains.
[85 FR 68675, Oct. 29, 2020]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> CT
<CIK> 0000913778
<NAME> BOSTON CAPITAL TAX CREDIT FUND IV L.P.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             259,200,587
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               259,200,587
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,498,953
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (14,067,454)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (11,568,501)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
§ 1304.208 Shoreline stabilization on TVA-owned residential access shoreland. TVA may issue permits allowing adjacent residential landowners to stabilize eroding shorelines on TVA-owned residential access shoreland. TVA will determine if shoreline erosion is sufficient to approve the proposed stabilization treatment. ( a ) Biostabilization of eroded shorelines. ( 1 ) Moderate contouring of the bank may be allowed to provide conditions suitable for planting of vegetation.
( 2 ) Tightly bound bundles of coconut fiber, logs, or other natural materials may be placed at the base of the eroded site to deflect waves.
( 3 ) Willow stakes and bundles and live cuttings of suitable native plant materials may be planted along the surface of the eroded area.
( 4 ) Native vegetation may be planted within the shoreline management zone to help minimize further erosion.
( 5 ) Riprap may be allowed along the base of the eroded area to prevent further undercutting of the bank.
( b ) Use of gabions and riprap to stabilize eroded shorelines. ( 1 ) The riprap material must be quarry-run stone, natural stone, or other material approved by TVA.
( 2 ) Rubber tires, concrete rubble, or other debris salvaged from construction sites shall not be used to stabilize shorelines.
( 3 ) Gabions (rock wrapped with wire mesh) that are commercially manufactured for erosion control may be used.
( 4 ) Riprap material must be placed so as to follow the existing contour of the bank.
( 5 ) Site preparation must be limited to the work necessary to obtain adequate slope and stability of the riprap material.
( c ) Use of retaining walls for shoreline stabilization. ( 1 ) Retaining walls shall be allowed only where the erosion process is severe and TVA determines that a retaining wall is the most effective erosion control option or where the proposed wall would connect to an existing TVA-approved wall on the lot or to an adjacent owner's TVA-approved wall.
( 2 ) The retaining wall must be constructed of stone, concrete blocks, poured concrete, gabions, or other materials acceptable to TVA. Railroad ties, rubber tires, broken concrete (unless determined by TVA to be of adequate size and integrity), brick, creosote timbers, and asphalt are not allowed.
( 3 ) Reclamation of land that has been lost to erosion is not allowed.
( 4 ) The base of the retaining wall shall not be located more than an average of two horizontal feet lakeward of the existing full summer pool water. Riprap shall be placed at least two feet in depth along the footer of the retaining wall to deflect wave action and reduce undercutting that could eventually damage the retaining wall.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T O SW A LD O A N TO N I O SA LA ZA R, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 74956 A ge nc yN o. A 073- 967- 205 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d A pr i l5, 2010 ** B efo re: R Y M E R , M cK E O W N , an dP A E Z , C i rcu i tJu d g es. O s w a l do A nt oni o S a l a z ar , ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of E l S a l va dor , pe t i t i ons f or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ order di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l fr om an i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s de c i s i on de ny i ng hi s appl i c a t i on f oraw a i ve rof 

# FI LED

APR19 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS07- 74956 2 i n a d mi s s i b i l i tyu n d e rI mmi g r a t i o n an dN a t i o n a l i tyA c t§ 2 1 2 ( h ) , 8 U . S. C. § 1 18 2(h). O ur j uri sdi ct i on i s gov erned b y 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e di sm i ss i n p art an dd e n yi n p artth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. W e l ac k j uri sdi ct i on t o revi ew the agency’ s di sposi t i ve di sc re t i on ary d e te rm in a tio n th a t S a la z ard idn o t m e r it ag r an t o f § 2 1 2 ( h ) r e lie f

. See 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 5 2 ( a ) ( 2 ) ( B ) ( i) ; Mej i a v. G on zales , 4 9 9 F .3 d9 9 1 , 9 9 9 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 7 ) . S al az ar ’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s are no tpers uasi ve. P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D IS M IS S E D i n p art; D E N IE D i n p art.
Engine and Propeller Directorate 12 New England Executive Park Burlington, MA 01803 (781) 238 - 71 10 , Fax: (781) 238 - 7199

July 22, 2013 Charles A. Barth , Director Office of the Federal Register (NF) National Archives and Records Administration 700 P ennsylvania Ave. NW Washington, D.C. 20408 - 0001 Dear Mr. Barth : Under 1 CFR part 51, we request that you approve the incorporation b y reference of the material listed below into the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). An original cop y of the material is enclosed. We will reference the following material in 14 CFR 39.13: Pratt & Whitney

Alert Service Bulletin No. PW4G - 112 - A72 - 330, Revision 2, dated July 11, 2013. We have also included a draft of the rule that incorporates the material into the CFR. Plea se contact me if you have any questions. Sincerel y, Brian Warner Technical Writer- Editor Engine & Propeller Directorate Aircraft Certification Service (781) 238 - 7 169
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       9,886,804
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               35,255,193
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            49,481,725
<PP&E>                                     354,089,716
<DEPRECIATION>                              20,974,777
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             385,291,630
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       40,453,591
<BONDS>                                    211,418,736
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       146,146
<OTHER-SE>                                 108,556,841
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               385,291,630
<SALES>                                     66,318,249
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            66,318,249
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               38,383,805
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (250,971)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           7,959,696
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             20,225,719
<INCOME-TAX>                                 7,483,516
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                12,742,203
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .89


</TABLE>
### §2653. EPA study of asbestos-containing material in public buildings

Within 360 days after October 22, 1986, the Administrator shall conduct and submit to the Congress the results of a study which shall—

(1) assess the extent to which asbestos-containing materials are present in public and commercial buildings;

(2) assess the condition of asbestos-containing material in commercial buildings and the likelihood that persons occupying such buildings, including service and maintenance personnel, are, or may be, exposed to asbestos fibers;

(3) consider and report on whether public and commercial buildings should be subject to the same inspection and response action requirements that apply to school buildings;

(4) assess whether existing Federal regulations adequately protect the general public, particularly abatement personnel, from exposure to asbestos during renovation and demolition of such buildings; and

(5) include recommendations that explicitly address whether there is a need to establish standards for, and regulate asbestos exposure in, public and commercial buildings.

(Pub. L. 94–469, title II, §213, as added Pub. L. 99–519, §2, Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2987.)
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 48 (Friday, March 11, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 13443]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5577]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>12456 and <greek-i>12457]


California Disaster Number CA-00164

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of California 
(FEMA-1952-DR), dated 01/26/2011.
    Incident: Severe Winter Storms, Flooding, and Debris and Mud Flows.
    Incident Period: 12/17/2010 through 01/04/2011.
    Effective Date: 03/03/2011.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 03/28/2011.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/26/2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of 
California, dated 01/26/2011, is hereby amended to include the 
following areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

Primary Counties: Madera, Mariposa.

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

James E. Rivera,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011-5577 Filed 3-10-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
**Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 5 October 2011 – Cooperativa Vitivinícola Arousana v OHIM – Sotelo Ares (ROSALIA
DE CASTRO)**

**(Case T-421/10)**

Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for Community word mark ROSALIA DE CASTRO – Earlier national word mark ROSALIA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the goods – Assessment of the conceptual similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009

Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services
– Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 27, 46-48)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 July 2010 (Case R 1804/2008‐4), relating to opposition proceedings between María Constantina Sotelo Ares and Cooperativa Vitivinícola Arousana, S. Coop. Galega. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders Cooperativa Vitivinícola Arousana, S. Coop. Galega to pay the costs. |
### §51. Effect on other statutory provisions

Nothing contained in this subchapter shall be construed to prevent or interfere with the enforcement of the provisions of the antitrust Acts or the Acts to regulate commerce, nor shall anything contained in this subchapter be construed to alter, modify, or repeal the said antitrust Acts or the Acts to regulate commerce or any part or parts thereof.

(Sept. 26, 1914, ch. 311, §11, 38 Stat. 724.)
#   NSDUH 2024 Methodological Resource Book (MRB)

Use this collection to provide context for estimates from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH). This collection includes materials used to conduct the survey, reports on how the survey was conducted, and reports on how the data were processed. The Statistical Inference Report details how the data were analyzed for reports and tables, which may be useful for data users looking to do their own analysis.

New items are added to the collection as they become available, so resources published in a previous MRB may not yet be available for 2024. However, there are generally few changes from year to year, and a report from a previous year may have the information you are looking for.

National Survey on Drug Use and Health

This is a collection

                        -  In This Collection 
                        -  Related Collections 
                        -  Report Resources 

### In This Collection

NSDUH 2024 Field Interviewer Manual

Collected Date: 2024 | Published Date: February 29, 2024 | Type: National Survey on Drug Use and Health

NSDUH 2024 Questionnaire

Collected Date: 2024 | Published Date: February 29, 2024 | Type: National Survey on Drug Use and Health

NSDUH 2024 Screening Specifications

Collected Date: 2024 | Published Date: February 29, 2024 | Type: National Survey on Drug Use and Health

NSDUH 2024 Showcards

Collected Date: 2024 | Published Date: February 29, 2024 | Type: National Survey on Drug Use and Health

### Related Collections

### Report Resources

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Data Archive (SAMHDA)'s page about NSDUH.

 < Back to Main content
###### Editorial Note on Part 284

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 284 appear at 65 FR 10222, Feb. 25, 2000.

#### § 284.271 Waiver.

The Commission may, by order, waive the requirements of this subpart in connection with any emergency natural gas transaction to the extent required by the public interest.
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2009-NM-234-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES () explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
Exhibit 10.3


 





CONSENT OF GEOLOGIST
PAUL PELKE


I,
Paul Pelke, Certified Professional Geologist No. 11461, consent to the inclusion of certain information derived from a geological
report prepared by me relating to the properties describing in detail in the Registration Statement of Rancho Santa Fe Mining,
Inc. on Form S-1. Such consent includes the use of the content of the geological report and to the written disclosure of the geological
report and of extracts from or a summary of the geological report in the written disclosure being filed.





	/s/Paul Pelke       
	Paul Pelke	Dated: February 29, 2016