alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 321.3 Cooperation of States for the interstate shipment of carcasses, parts of carcasses, meat, and meat food products. ( a ) The Administrator is authorized under 21 U.S.C. 683(b) to coordinate with States that have meat inspection programs as provided in § 321.1 of this part to select certain establishments operating under these programs to participate in a cooperative program to ship carcasses, parts of carcasses, meat, and meat food products in interstate commerce. A cooperative program for this purpose is called a “cooperative interstate shipment program.”
( b ) Establishments selected to participate in a cooperative interstate shipment program described in this section must receive inspection services from designated State personnel that have been trained in the enforcement of the Act. If the designated personnel determine that the carcasses, parts of carcasses, meat, and meat food products prepared in establishments selected to participate in the cooperative interstate shipment program comply with all requirements under the Act, these items will bear an official Federal mark of inspection and may be shipped in interstate commerce. The Administrator will assign an FSIS “selected establishment coordinator,” who will be an FSIS employee, to each State that participates in a cooperative interstate shipment program to provide Federal oversight of the program and enforcement of the program's requirements. The Federal contribution for inspection services provided by States that enter into a cooperative interstate shipment program under this section will be at least 60 percent of eligible State costs. Eligible State costs are those costs that a State has justified and FSIS has approved as necessary for the State to provide inspection services to selected establishments in the State.
( c ) Part 332 of this subchapter prescribes conditions under which States and establishments may participate in the cooperative interstate shipment program.
( d ) The Administrator will terminate a cooperative interstate shipment agreement with a State if the Administrator determines that the State is not conducting inspection at selected establishments in a manner that complies with the Act and the implementing regulations in this chapter.
[76 FR 24752, May 2, 2011]
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report on Form 10-K/A of FirstService Corporation (the "Company") dated February 11, 2004 containing the
financial statements of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report") filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, John B.
Friedrichsen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best
of my knowledge:

|February 11, 2004 | /s/JOHN B. FRIEDRICHSENJohn B. Friedrichsen Senior Vice
President and
Chief Financial Officer
|----------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

45

---

QuickLinks
### SUBCHAPTER III—PROCEDURE
# C_2010161EN.01003102.xml

| 19.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/31

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio lodged on 2 April 2010 — Mirko De Filippo v Ministero dell'Interno

(Case C-170/10)

(2010/C 161/44)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Mirko De Filippo

Defendant: Ministero dell’Interno

Question referred

Is a national system under national legislation (introduced as from the Bersani Decree, Decree-Law No 223 of 4 July 2006, converted into Law No 248 of 4 August 2006) compatible with Articles 43 and 49 of the EC Treaty, when it, inter alia:

| (a) | tends generally to protect holders of licences issued at an earlier period following a tendering procedure that unlawfully excluded some operators; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

tends generally to protect holders of licences issued at an earlier period following a tendering procedure that unlawfully excluded some operators;

| (b) | in fact ensures the maintenance of acquired commercial positions (by, for example, prohibiting new licensees from locating their kiosks within a specified distance of those already in existence); |
| --- | --- |

(b)

in fact ensures the maintenance of acquired commercial positions (by, for example, prohibiting new licensees from locating their kiosks within a specified distance of those already in existence);

| (c) | provides for cases in which the licence may lapse when the licensee directly or indirectly carries on cross- border gaming activities analogous to those under the licence? |
| --- | --- |

(c)

provides for cases in which the licence may lapse when the licensee directly or indirectly carries on cross- border gaming activities analogous to those under the licence?

---
-  Home 

# Explosive Examination Agency Approvals Evaluation Criteria

Evaluation Criteria for Third Party Approval Testing Explosives.pdf (11.94 KB)

*DOT is committed to ensuring that information is available in appropriate alternative formats to meet the requirements of persons who have a disability. If you require an alternative version of files provided on this page, please contact          PHMSA-Accessibility@dot.gov.*
### §1156. Use of existing facilities

#### (a) Available assistance

The Secretary may utilize any personnel, facilities, bureaus, agencies, boards, administrations, offices, or other instrumentalities of the Department of Commerce which he may require to carry out the purposes of this chapter.

#### (b) Cooperation of other agencies

The Secretary is authorized to call upon other departments and independent establishments and agencies of the Government to provide, with their consent, such available services, facilities, or other cooperation as he shall deem necessary or helpful in carrying out the provisions of this chapter, and he is directed to utilize existing facilities to the full extent deemed feasible.

(Sept. 9, 1950, ch. 936, §6, 64 Stat. 824.)
#### § 7.7 Other appeals and grievances.

The personnel system shall provide procedures for the processing of complaints and grievances which are not otherwise provided for.
NO. 07-06-0121-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

JULY 20, 2006

______________________________

MIGUEL JAIME TORREZ, APPELLANT

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 31st DISTRICT COURT OF LIPSCOMB COUNTY;

NO. 1105; HON. STEVEN RAY EMMERT, PRESIDING

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before this Court is appellant’s motion to dismiss his appeal. Appellant and

his attorney both have signed the document stating that appellant withdraws his appeal.

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). No decision of this Court having been delivered to date, we grant

the motion. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. No motion for rehearing will be

entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.

James T. Campbell

Justice

Do not publish.
### §2402. Congressional statement of purpose

It is the purpose of this chapter—

(1) to establish a national policy which will encourage productivity growth consistent with needs of the economy, the natural environment, and the needs, rights, and best interests of management, the work force, and consumers; and

(2) to establish as an independent establishment of the executive branch a National Center for Productivity and Quality of Working Life to focus, coordinate, and promote efforts to improve the rate of productivity growth.

(Pub. L. 94–136, title I, §102, Nov. 28, 1975, 89 Stat. 734.)
#### THE PEOPLE OF THE TERRITORY OF GUAM v. JOHN C. DELA ROSA, Defendant

Criminal Case No. 116F-78

Superior Court of Guam

August 16, 1978

*548ABBATE, *Presiding Judge*

DECISION

This matter comes before the Court on defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, which is based upon his Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial and upon § 80.60(a)(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code of the territory of Guam. Section 80.60(a) (2) states that:

> (a) Except as otherwise provided in Subsection (b), the court shall dismiss a criminal action if: * * * (2) The trial of a defendant, who is in custody at the time of his arraignment, has not commenced within forty-five days after his arraignment. . . .

Defendant was arraigned on June 9,1978, and trial commenced on August 10, 1978. There was thus a sixty-two-day period between arraignment and trial. However, dismissal of a criminal action under § 80.60(a)(2) is not mandatory. Rather, it is qualified by § 80.60(b), which provides in pertinent part:

> (b) A criminal action *shall not be dismissed*pursuant to Subsection (a) if: * :|: * (3) *Good cause is shown*for the failure to commence the trial within the prescribed period. (Emphasis added.)

*549This court finds that there was good cause for not commencing the trial within the period prescribed by § 80.60(a)(2), in that a key prosecution witness, Ms. Yamato, was unavailable to testify due to injuries she suffered as a victim of the alleged crime. This being the case, defendant’s motion must be denied insofar as it is based upon § 80.60(a) (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.

The delay occasioned by Ms. Yamato’s unavailability also causes defendant’s Sixth Amendment challenge to fail. The U.S. Supreme Court, in *Barker v. Wingo, 407*U.S. 381, 92 S.Ct. 2182 (1972), clearly stated:

> [A] valid reason, *such as a missing witness,*should serve to justify appropriate delay. 92 S.Ct. at 2192 (emphasis added).

For the aforementioned reasons, defendant’s motion is hereby denied.

SO ORDERED.
**EXHIBIT NO. 99.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of SangStat Medical Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), Richard D. Murdock, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| **Signature**          |   | **Title**                                                                                               |   | **Date**       |
|------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------|
|                        |   |                                                                                                         |   |                |
|                   |   |                                                                                                    |   |           |
| /s/ RICHARD D. MURDOCK |   | Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |   | March 26, 2003 |
|                        |   |                                                                                                    |   |
| **Richard D. Murdock** |   |                                                                                                    |   |
|                   |   |                                                                                                    |   |

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposesof Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
§ 93.900 Definitions. Wherever in this subpart the following terms are used, unless the context otherwise requires, they shall be construed, respectively, to mean: *Administrator.* The Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, or any person authorized to act for the Administrator.
*Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.* The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service of the United States Department of Agriculture (APHIS).
*APHIS representative.* A veterinarian or other individual employed by the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, United States Department of Agriculture, who is authorized to perform the services required by this part.
*Certifying official.* An individual authorized by the competent authority of a country to sign health certificates for aquatic animals.
*Competent authority.* The national veterinary services or other authority of a country, having the responsibility and competence for ensuring or supervising the implementation of aquatic animal health measures.
*Container.* A transport receptacle that is specially constructed to facilitate transportation of aquatic animals or aquatic animal products by one or several means of transport.
*Department.* The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA).
*Fertilized egg.* A viable fertilized ovum of an aquatic animal.
*Gamete.* The sperm or unfertilized egg of aquatic animals that is held or transported separately.
*Inspector.* An employee of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service authorized to perform duties required under this subpart.
*Person.* Any individual, corporation, company, association, firm, partnership, society or joint stock company.
*Port veterinarian.* A veterinarian employed by the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service to perform duties required under this subpart at a port of entry.
*Region.* Any defined geographic land area identifiable by geological, political, or surveyed boundaries. A region may consist of any of the following: ( 1 ) A national entity (country);
( 2 ) Part of a national entity (zone, county, department, municipality, parish, Province, State, etc.);
( 3 ) Parts of several national entities combined into an area; or
( 4 ) A group of national entities (countries) combined into a single area.
*Spring viremia of carp (SVC).* A disease caused by infection with spring viremia of carp virus, a rhabodivrus capable of infecting several carp species, in addition to some other cyprinid and ictalurid fish species.
*SVC-susceptible species.* Common carp (*Cyprinus carpio*), grass carp (*Ctenopharyngodon idellus*), silver carp (*Hypophthalmichthys molitrix*), bighead carp (*Aristichthys nobilis*), Crucian carp (*Carassius carassius*), goldfish (*Carassius auratus*), tench (*Tinca tinca*), and sheatfish (*Silurus glanis*).
*United States.* All of the States of the United States, the District of Columbia, Guam, Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands of the United States, and all other territories and possessions of the United States.
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Jupiter Marine
International Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the nine month
period ending April 29, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carl Herndon, Principal
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


By: /s/ Carl Herndon
    ----------------
    Carl Herndon
    Principal Executive Officer
    June 9, 2006
#### § 55.5 Presentation of claims for indemnity.

Claims for indemnity for the value of animals destroyed must be documented on a form furnished by APHIS and presented to an APHIS employee or a State representative authorized to accept the claims.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0189)
### §2292. Annual report to the President and Congress

The Bank shall, as soon as practicable after the end of each fiscal year, transmit to the President and the Congress an annual report of its operations and activities.

(Pub. L. 93–224, §13, Dec. 29, 1973, 87 Stat. 941.)
-  Home 
-  Technical Resources 

# In This Section

                      -  HazMat Technical Resources 
                      -  Technical Reports 

## Related Links

                  -                                          Inspection Procedure for Inspection of DOT/TC cylinder Mounting Threads (Rev 3 ...                   

## Related Documents

                  -                                          Neck Threads Inspection: External PDF                   

# Neck Threads Inspection: External

**July 31, 2007**

Basic guidelines for the inspection and evaluation of DOT/TC cylinder (tube) mounting threads with outside diameter greater than or equal 18".

**Key Words:** neck threads, DOT cylinder, tube, threads, external, inspection

If you have any **technical questions** not addressed by this or associated documents, contact Mark Toughiry, 202-366-4545.

[NOTE: The attached documents are in PDF format, you can download a free viewer.  If you have problems accessing the PDFs or the information, report your problem for further assistance.]
2015 CROP YEAR

NON-IRRIGATED COTTON

YIELD EXCLUSION (YE)

Gulf of Mexico

Atlantic

Ocean

Pacific

Ocean

-130° -120° -110° -100° -90° -80° -70°

45° 40° 35° 30° 25°

Coordinate System: Albers

Central Meridian: 96°0'0"W

1st Std Parallel: 20°0'0"N

2nd Std Parallel: 60°0'0"N

Latitude of Origin: 40°0'0"N

Metadata:

County Files - US Census Tiger

Files 2013

YE Coverage - USDA - RMA

December 2014

0 125 250 500 750 1,000

Miles

STATEMENT

The Maps produced represent

the number of years (since 1995)

eligible for yield exclusion for

the 2015 crop year.

Document Path: K:\APH\NonIrrigated\Cotton\Non-IrrigatedCotton.mxd

TABLE

Links directly to the state table

(double click)

Number of Years Eligible for

Yield Exclusion (YE)

0 years

1 year

2 to 4 years

5 to 7 years

8 to 10 years

11 to 15 years
§ 93.802 Import permit. ( a ) An elephant, hippopotamus, rhinoceros, or tapir shall not be imported into the United States unless accompanied by an import permit issued by APHIS and unless imported into the United States within 30 days after the proposed date of arrival stated in the import permit. The port veterinarian must be notified of the date of arrival at least 72 hours before the animal arrives in the United States.
( b ) An application for an import permit may be obtained from Strategy and Policy, Veterinary Services, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, 4700 River Road, Riverdale, Maryland 20737; or by visiting *https://www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/resources/sa_epermits/eauth-epermits .* A separate application must be prepared for each shipment.
( c ) The completed application shall include the following information: ( 1 ) The name and address of the person intending to export an elephant, hippopotamus, rhinoceros, or tapir to the United States;
( 2 ) The name and address of the person intending to import an elephant, hippopotamus, rhinoceros, or tapir into the United States;
( 3 ) The species, breed, and number of elephants, hippopotami, rhinoceroses, or tapirs to be imported;
( 4 ) The purpose of the importation;
( 5 ) The port of embarkation;
( 6 ) The name and concentration of the pesticide intended to be used to treat the elephant, hippopotamus, rhinoceros, or tapir for ectoparasites prior to the animal being transported to the United States;
( 7 ) The mode of transportation;
( 8 ) The route of travel;
( 9 ) The port of entry in the United States and, if applicable, the address of the facility to be provided by the importer for inspection, treatment, and incineration pursuant to § 93.6 of this part;
( 10 ) The proposed date of arrival in the United States; and
( 11 ) The name and address of the person to whom the elephant, hippopotamus, rhinoceros, or tapir will be delivered in the United States.
( d ) After receipt and review of the application by APHIS, an import permit indicating the applicable conditions under this part for importation into the United States shall be issued for the importation of the elephant, hippopotamus, rhinoceros, or tapir described in the application if such animal appears to be eligible to be imported. Even though an import permit has been issued for the importation of an elephant, hippopotamus, rhinoceros, or tapir, the animal may be imported only if all applicable requirements of this part are met.
[52 FR 29502, Aug. 10, 1987, as amended at 57 FR 23049, June 1, 1992; 59 FR 67615, Dec. 30, 1994. Redesignated at 62 FR 56012, Oct. 28, 1997; 81 FR 40151, June 21, 2016; 86 FR 45625, Aug. 16, 2021]
#### §§ 75.1-75.3 [Reserved]