alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011355EN.01000702.xml

| 3.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 355/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 355/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 October 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Bruxelles — Belgium) — Waypoint Aviation SA v État belge — SPF Finances

(Case C-9/11) (1)

1

(Freedom to provide services - Tax legislation - Tax credit on income from loans granted for the acquisition of assets used on national territory - Exclusion of assets for which the right to use is transferred to a third party established in another Member State)

2011/C 355/11

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Cour d’appel de Bruxelles

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Waypoint Aviation SA

Applicant:

Defendant: État belge — SPF Finances

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Cour d’appel de Bruxelles — Interpretation of Article 10 EC (Article 4(3) EU) and Article 49 EC (Article 56 TFEU) — National legislation which grants a tax credit to the recipients of income from debt-claims or loans granted to a national coordination centre — Right to use assets acquired using borrowed funds by a resident company in the same group as that to which the coordination centre belongs — Exclusion of non-resident companies in the same group — Restrictions on the freedom to provide services

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 49 EC must be interpreted as precluding a legislative provision of a Member State, such as that in issue in the main proceedings, which provides for the grant of a tax credit on income from loans provided to certain companies for the acquisition of new assets used on the national territory subject to the condition that the right to use the asset is not transferred, by the company which acquired it through the loan conferring entitlement to the tax credit or by any other company in the same group, to third parties other than members of that group established in that Member State.

---

(1)  OJ C 95, 26.3.2011.

1

---
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Steven B. Rash certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Power3 Medical Products, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for the periods presented in this report;

4.

The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

a.

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c.

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting to the small business issuers auditors and audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a.

All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

b.

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  November 14, 2007



| |     |                                     
| | --- | ------------------------------------
| | By: | /s/ STEVENB. RASH                   
| |     | Steven B. Rash                      
| |     | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
# C_2013367EN.01000201.xml

| 14.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 367/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 367/2

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 October 2013 — Council of the European Union v Access Info Europe, Hellenic Republic, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

(Case C-280/11 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Right of access to documents of the institutions - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Article 4(3), first subparagraph - Protection of the institutions’ decision-making process - Note from the Council General Secretariat on the proposals submitted in the course of the legislative process for the revision of Regulation No 1049/2001 - Partial access - Refusal of access to information relating to the identity of Member States which put forward proposals)

2013/C 367/02

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen and C. Fekete, Agents)

Appellant:

Interveners in support of the appellant: Czech Republic (represented by: M. Smolek and D. Hadroušek, Agents), Kingdom of Spain (represented by: S. Centeno Huerta, Agent), French Republic (represented by: G. de Bergues and N. Rouam, Agents)

Interveners in support of the appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Access Info Europe (represented by: O. Brouwer and J. Blockx, advocaten), Hellenic Republic (represented by: E.-M. Mamouna and K. Boskovits, Agents), United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Other parties to the proceedings:

Intervener in support of Access Info Europe: European Parliament (represented by A. Caiola and M. Dean, Agents)

Intervener in support of Access Info Europe:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of 22 March 2011 in Case T-233/09 Access Info Europe v Council by which the General Court (Third Chamber) annulled the Council's decision of 26 February 2009 refusing in part to grant the applicant access to a note drawn up by the Council General Secretariat and addressed to the Working Party on Information (Document No 16338/08), concerning a proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents

Access Info Europ

Council

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders the Council of the European Union to pay the costs incurred by Access Info Europe; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Council of the European Union to pay the costs incurred by Access Info Europe;

| 3. | Orders the Czech Republic, the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic and the European Parliament to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Czech Republic, the Hellenic Republic, the Kingdom of Spain, the French Republic and the European Parliament to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 238, 13.8.2011.

1

---
# C_2011252EN.01005403.xml

| 27.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/54

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 16 June 2011 — Dricot-Daniele and Others v Commission

(Case F-92/10) (1)

1

(Staff cases - Annual adjustment of the remuneration and pensions of officials and other servants - No need to adjudicate)

2011/C 252/119

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Luiga Dricot-Daniele (Overijse, Belgium) and Others (represented by: C. Mourato, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J Currall and G. Berscheid, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of the applicants’ correcting pay slips for the period from July to December 2009 and the pay slips issued after 1 January 2010 in the context of the annual adjustment of remuneration and pensions of officials and other servants on the basis of Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1296/2009 of 23 December 2009.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no need to adjudicate on Case F-92/10 Dricot-Daniele and Others v Commission. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no need to adjudicate on Case F-92/10 Dricot-Daniele and Others v Commission.

| 2. | Each party is ordered to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each party is ordered to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 13, 15.01.2011, p. 40.

1

---
# C_2010288EN.01005401.xml

| 23.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/54

---

Action brought on 26 August 2010 — Milux v OHMI (VESICACONTROL)

(Case T-351/10)

()

(2010/C 288/100)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Milux Holding SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: J. Bojs, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 28 July 2010 in case R 1439/2009-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 28 July 2010 in case R 1439/2009-4;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘VESICACONTROL’ for goods and services in classes 9, 10 and 44

Decision of the examiner: Refused the application for a Community trade mark

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal misapplied the principle of non-discrimination and equal treatment to the facts in this case; in the alternative, infringement of Articles 7(1)(b) and 7(1)(c) of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal erred in its conclusion that the trade mark applied for does not possess sufficient inherent distinctiveness.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6102

M. RODNEY JONES, a/k/a Rodney E. Jones, a/k/a

Rodney M. Jones,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; GENE

NOLES, South Carolina Official; JAMES E.

SLIGH, JR., South Carolina Official; JUDY

ANDERSON, South Carolina Official; GARY

MAYNARD, South Carolina Official; SHARON

JAMES, South Carolina Official; DAVID CRISP,

South Carolina Official; PHILLIP E. MCLEOD,

South Carolina Official; DEBRA BARNWELL, South

Carolina Official; ROBERT E. WARD; GREGORY

GOSNELL; MS. WHITAKER; WILLIAM WHITE; W. GREG

RYBERG,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge.

(CA-02-1109-24-3)

Submitted: May 7, 2003 Decided: May 27, 2003

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

M. Rodney Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Roy Settana, Jr., MCKAY,

MCKAY & SETTANA, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

M. Rodney Jones appeals the district court’s order accepting

the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Jones’ motions

for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. See Jones v. South Carolina Dep’t of Corr., No.

CA-02-1109-24-3 (D.S.C. filed Dec. 24, 2002 & entered Dec. 26,

2002). We deny Jones’ motion for oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

DAVID HATCHIGIAN,

Petitioner

v.

PECO/EXELON AND MUNICIPAL 

INSPECTION CORPORATION,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 442 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 19th day of February, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
BEFORE THE 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON D.C. 

Petition of: 

DELTA AIR LIrqES, INC. 

OPERATING CERTIFICATE DALA026A 

For exemption of certain requirements of 

14 C.F.R. §91.9(a) 

Docket FAA-2012-1349 

PETITION OF DELTA AIR LINES, INC. 

FOR AN AMENDMENT TO EXEMPTION 10818 

August 27, 2015 

Delta Air Lines, Inc., operating certificate DALA026A, hereby petitions the Federal Aviation 

Administrat:on (FAA), pursuant to 14 C.F.R. Part 11 for an amendment to the partiai relief 

granted within exemption 10818 from Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) §91.9(a). 

Specificaily, Delta seeks continued relief to utilize an approved device on the flight deck 

under certain conditions and limitations for the purpose of conducting research into 

turbulence mitigation and avoidance. 

This reiief provided through this exempt+on has been used to the benefit of the 

traveling public with no known compromise of safety. With regard to public interest and 

equivalent ;evels of safety, the circumstances that warranted the initial grant of 

exemption continue to exist. 

This petition does not seek to change the conditions and limitations of the current 

exemption. 

The renewaV of this exemption is not a controversiai issue. For this reason, and the 

reasons stated above, Delta Air Lines requests that a finding of good cause be made for 

waiving publication in the Federal Register. Granting the requested reiief will set no 

precedents. The existence of the exemption is well known and widely accepted. 

A summary of this petition as required by 14 CFR §11.81 is attached. 
Petition for Exemption - (FAR) §91.9(a) 

Delta Air Lines, Inc. 

August 27, 2015 

Page 2 

Please contact Charles M. Schramek, General Manager Quality Assurance and Compliance, 

at (404) 715-1112 or e-mail at chuck.schramek(o)delta.com , if you have and questions or 

need additional information. 

Sincerely, 

4'z eph Dickson 

~ S ior Vice President Flight Operations 

elta Air Lines, Inc. 

Attachment 
Petition for Exemption - (FAR) §91.9(a) 

Delta Air Lines, Inc. 

August 27, 2015 

Page 3 

Sa::nmary ff®r fFeaera ~ Reguster 

DeGti.;F Qur L'.nces EKempt;®n 2.0818 

Delta Air Lines, Inc., operating certificate DALA026A, in accordance with the provisions of 

Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) §11.25, petitions for a continuation of exemption 10818. 

This extension will allow Delta Air Lines to utilize an approved device on the flight deck 

under certain conditions and limitations for the purpose of conducting research into 

turbulence mitigat9on and avoidance.
### §1457. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 89–755, §8, Nov. 3, 1966, 80 Stat. 1300; Pub. L. 93–608, §3(2), Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1972; Pub. L. 97–375, title II, §§202(d), 206(b), Dec. 21, 1982, 96 Stat. 1822, 1823, which required officers and agencies required or authorized by this chapter to promulgate regulations, to transmit an annual report to Congress describing activities carried out for the administration and enforcement of this chapter, terminated, effective May 15, 2000, pursuant to section 3003 of Pub. L. 104–66, as amended, set out as a note under section 1113 of Title 31, Money and Finance. See, also, pages 54, 92, and 172 of House Document No. 103–7.
**Exhibit 21.1**
 
 **SCHEDULE OF SUBSIDIARIES OF GABLES RESIDENTIAL TRUST**
 
 **Subsidiary**

**Jurisdiction**
**of Organization**

**Other Names Under**
**Which Subsidiary Does Business**Gables Realty Limited Partnership

Delaware

NoneGables GP, Inc.

Texas

NoneGables Residential Services, Inc.

Texas

Gables Corporate AccomodationsGables-Tennessee Properties, L.L.C.

Tennessee

NoneGables Construction, Inc.

Texas

NoneGBP Services, Inc.

Florida

NoneCandlewood Gen Par, Inc.

Georgia

NoneCandlewood-Indian Creek Limited Partnership

Georgia

NoneGables Champions Limited Partnership

Texas

NoneGables Realty GP, LLC

Texas

NoneGables River Oaks Limited Partnership

Texas

NoneGables Lions Head Limited

Texas

NoneGables Rivercrest II Limited

Texas

NoneGRT Villas Limited Partnership

Texas

NoneMetropolitan Apartments Venture

Texas

NonePin Oak Green

Texas

NonePin Oak Park Apartments

Texas

NoneState Thomas GP LLC

Delaware

NoneState Thomas LP

Delaware

NoneBoca Place LLC

Florida

NoneBoynton Beach LLC

Florida

NoneGables Jupiter LLC

Delaware

NoneKings Colony LLC

Florida

NoneMizner I LLC

Florida

NoneNorthlake Boulevard, LLC

Delaware

NoneSan Michele LLC

Florida

NoneSan Michele II LLC

Delaware

NoneSan Remo LLC

Florida

NoneBoynton Beach II LLC

Florida

NoneTown Colony LLC

Florida

NoneTown Colony II LLC

Florida

NoneSQ 157-AB Limited Partnership

District of Columbia

NoneGables Ambassador House LLC

District of Columbia

NoneVinings Realty Partners LLC

Florida

NoneIPX Northside, LLC

Georgia

NoneMV Gablechamp Limited Partnership

Delaware

NoneMV Gables Champion/Austin, LLC

Delaware

NoneGables at Stuart LLC

Florida

NoneMetropolitan III LLC

Delaware

NoneGables Rothbury LLC

Maryland

NoneIncome Growth Property Management, Inc.

California

None
03/22/201 0 15:2 3 FAX 202483514 2 FA A+ DM S 21001/00 2 

### ^'EPfS^SFOR

K UNITE D STATE S DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC E O FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D.C . "• j •' . "i n

I N THE MATTE ROF : § FA A Docke t No . CP09SW000 6 § AMERICA N EAGL E AIRLINES , INC . § FA A C<.ise2008SW21028 8 § § U . S . Administrativ e La w Judg e § Richar dC . Goodwi n NOTIC E O FDEPOSITIO N O FRONAL D STILLWFX L Pursuan t to 1 4 C.F.R . §I3.220(j) , pleas e take notic e tha t th e undersigne dcounse l wil l tak e th e depositio n upo n oral cxiuninaiio n o f Ronal dStillwell , Aviatio n Safet y Inspector , beginnin g a

t 9ai n o n Marc h 11 , 2010 , a t American Airlines , Inc. , 433 3 Amo n Carte r Boulevard , Fo n Worth , Texa s 76155 , befor

e acertifie dcour

t reporte r authorize dto administe r oaths , fo r all purpose s permitte db y federal rule s an dstatutes . Respectfull y submitted ,



# 4-^4i e Franci s C . Hei l American Airlines , Inc . Lega l Departmen t P.O . Bo x 61961 6 M D 567 5 DF W Airport , T

X 75261-961 6 Attorne y fo

r America n Kagi c Airlines , Inc . Diited : February 26 , 201 003/22/201 0 15;2 3 FA X 202493514 2 FA A* DM S 21002/00 2

CERTIFICAT E O FSERVIC E I hereb y certif

y tha i on Februar

y 26 , 2010 , acop y o f

th e foregoin g Notic e o f

Depositio n ha s bee n serve db y Federal Expres s Priorit y Overnigh t

delivery o n th e following : Ronal dSlillwell , Aviatio n Safely Inspecto r AM RCertificate s Managemen t Offic e 1480 0 Trinity Boulevard , Suit e 10 0 For t Worth , Texa s 7615 5 T ; 817-684-680 0 F : 817-684-692 0 Hearin g Docke t

Clerk , AGC-43 0 (U.S . Mai l only ) Federal Aviatio n Administratio n Offic e o f th e Chie f Counse l Wilbu r Wright Building . Suite 2W100 0 60 0 Independenc e Avenue , SW. , Washington , D C 2059 1 Rcn aM . Price , Aiiome y Federal Aviatio n Administratio n Southwes t Regio n Offic e o f th e Regiona l Counsel , ASW- 7 260 1 Meacha

mBlvd . For t Worth , Texa s 7613 7 rena.m.price@faa.go v T : 817-222-506 8 F : 817-222-594 5

Lis aA . Paparelli , Paralega l
- Home
- Newsroom

#  Congressional Testimony

# Pagination

-  1 
-  2 
-  3 
- …
-  ››› 
-  »Last »
**Exhibit 10.1**

 

----

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

     I, Bernard Kasriel, Chief Executive Officer of Lafarge, a *société anonyme* organized under French law, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Lafarge on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, to my knowledge, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Lafarge as of the dates and for theperiods set forth therein.:

Date: March 25, 2005

|   | /s/ Bernard Kasriel     |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Bernard Kasriel         |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Lafarge and will be retained by Lafarge and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
**Exhibit 13.2**

 

**STATEMENTOF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF**

**ARCADISN.V.**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**§906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theannual report of ARCADIS N.V. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the periodended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “Report”), I, Ben A. van der Klift, Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: May 15, 2007 | By:                            | /s/ Ben A. van der  Klift |   |
|--------------------|--------------------------------|---------------------------|--------|
|               | Ben A. van der Klift           |
|               | Chief Financial Officer        |
|               | (Principal Financial  Officer) |

 

                

----