alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex101to8k03864_06172008.htm


     

     

    Exhibit 10.1

     

     

    
      AMENDMENT
NO. 1 TO

       

      SENIOR
CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE

       

      This
Amendment No. 1 to the Senior Convertible Promissory Note (this “Amendment”) is
made effective as of June 17, 2008 and amends that certain Senior Convertible
Promissory Note dated as of May 19, 2008 (the “Note”) made by QueryObject
Systems Corporation (the “Company”), in favor of Dalewood Associates LP
(“Holder”).

       

      W I T N E S S E T
H:

       

      WHEREAS,
the interest that has accrued on the Note through the date hereof will be
converted into 1,924,683 shares of common stock of the Company, and accordingly,
upon the issuance of such 1,924,683 shares, there will be no interest due on the
note as of the date hereof; and

       

      WHEREAS,
the Company and the Holder desire to amend the Note as provided
herein;

       

      NOW
THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

       

      The
second sentence of the first paragraph of the Note is hereby amended as
follows:

       

      All
unpaid principal, together with any then unpaid and accrued interest and other
amounts payable hereunder, shall be due and payable on the earlier of (i) May
19, 2009 and (ii) an “Event of Default” (as
hereafter defined) that has not been waived in writing by all “Holders” (as
hereafter defined).

       

      Signature
page follows

       

       

      
        
          
          

        

        
          
          

          
            

          

        

        
          
          

        

      

       

       

      IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 1 to the
Senior Convertible Promissory Note as of the date first written
above.

       

      
        
          	
                  THE
      COMPANY:

                	 
      	
                  THE
      HOLDER:

                
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
                  QUERYOBJECT
      SYSTEMS

                  CORPORATION

                	 
      	
                  DALEWOOD
      ASSOCIATES LP

                
	 
      	 
      	
                  By:
      Dalewood Associates, Inc.,

                         its General
      Partner

                
	 	 	 
	
                  By:

                	/s/
      Daniel Pess	 
      	
                  By:

                	/s/
      Steve Levine
	
                  Name:

                	Daniel
      Pess  	 
      	
                  Name:

                	Steve
      Levine  
	
                  Title:

                	President	 
      	
                  Title:

                	Chief
      Exective Officer
#### § 319.880 Breaded products.

The amount of batter and breading used as a coating for breaded product shall not exceed 30 percent of the weight of the finished breaded product.
AFS-12-218-E 

February 10, 2012 

 Exemption No. 6029H 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2001-11170 

Mr. John Monks 

Head of Quality, Customer Services & 

 Repair Station General Manager 

Airbus SAS 

1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte 

31707 Blagnac Cedex 

France 

Dear Mr. Monks: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 6029, 

as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated October 13, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of Airbus SAS (Airbus) for an extension of Exemption No. 6029, as amended. That 

exemption from §§ 145.103 and 145.107(c) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations 

(14 CFR) allows the production units of the members and associated partners of the Airbus 

consortium to be certificated collectively under Airbus as a foreign repair station to support 

the operation of U.S.-registered Airbus A300, A310, A318, A319, A320, A330, A340, and 

A380 series aircraft. That exemption allows Airbus members and partners to perform 

maintenance to a common standard throughout its system. Further, the following spare parts 

distribution/support centers are included under that exemption and are part of the Airbus 

quality monitoring system: (1) Airspares, located in Hamburg, Germany; and (2) ASCO 

Spares, located in Ashburn, Virginia, United States. Airbus is responsible for ensuring that 

all units and facilities perform maintenance in accordance to Airbus repair station standards 

and requirements as identified by the appropriate Airbus manual system. 

The FAA notes the need to add the A321 series aircraft, which currently is not included in 

Exemption No. 6029, as amended. 
 2

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register. The requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, 

and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Airbus. 

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 6029, as 

amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. 

Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA 

Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition. 

The Effect of Our Decision 

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 6029, as amended, to February 

28, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 6029, as amended, remain the same. This 

letter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 6029. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

John S. Duncan 

Acting Director, Flight Standards 

 Service
#### § 3.3 Assignments to and from States.

The provisions of subchapter VI of chapter 33 of title 5, U.S. Code, and Office of Personnel Management implementing regulations apply to Government Accountability Office employees.
Exhibit




Exhibit 10.8.1 
Third Point Reinsurance Ltd. 


Schedule of Signatories to the Director Service Agreement
 
	
	
	 

	Name

	 

	Steven Fass

	 

	Rafe de la Gueronniere

	 

	Mary H. Hennessy

	 

	Mark Parkin

	 

	Gary D. Walters
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Rural Utilities Service

# AGENCY:

Rural Utilities Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of Solicitation of Applications; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The United States Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Rural Utilities Service (RUS) published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         of March 4, 2011, announcing the availability of $25 million in funding for Fiscal Year (FY) 2011 for the Community Connect Grant Program. The document contained an incorrect website.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Thomas P. Dickson, 202-690-4492.

## Correction

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         of March 4, 2011, in FR Doc. 76-12017, on page 12022, in the first column, under the heading “Agency Contacts” correct the Web site to read:                    

                        A. Web site:                         *http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/​utp_​commconnect.html.*

Dated: March 3, 2011.

Jonathan Adelstein,

Administrator, Rural Utilities Service.

[FR Doc. 2011-5500 Filed 3-9-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-15-P
# C_2010301EN.01005901.xml

| 6.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/59

---

Action brought on 13 September 2010 — Cortés del Valle López v OHIM (HIJOPUTA)

(Case T-417/10)

()

2010/C 301/94

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Federico Cortés del Valle López (Maliaño, Spain) (represented by J. Calderón Chavero, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 18 June 2010 in case R 175/2010-2; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 18 June 2010 in case R 175/2010-2;

| — | consequently, annul the OHIM examiner’s decision of 24 November 2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

consequently, annul the OHIM examiner’s decision of 24 November 2009;

| — | uphold the applicant’s claims; |
| --- | --- |

—

uphold the applicant’s claims;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the present proceedings should they be contested and reject its contentions. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the present proceedings should they be contested and reject its contentions.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark containing the word element ‘¡Que buenu ye! HIJOPUTA’ for goods and services in Classes 33, 35 and 39.

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Application for a Community trade mark refused.

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: No infringement of Article 7(1)(f) of Regulation No 207/2009, (1) as the mark applied for is not contrary to accepted principles of morality.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

1

---
### §706. United States Postal Service

Coast Guard facilities and personnel may be utilized for the transportation and delivery of mail matter during emergency conditions or at isolated locations under such arrangements as may be satisfactory to the Secretary and the United States Postal Service.

(Aug. 4, 1949, ch. 393, 63 Stat. 506, §146; Pub. L. 94–546, §1(12), Oct. 18, 1976, 90 Stat. 2519; Pub. L. 99–640, §10(a)(5), Nov. 10, 1986, 100 Stat. 3549; renumbered §706, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §106(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4203.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

This section provides generally for what has been the practice between the Coast Guard and the Post Office Department in Alaska for years. The authorization is limited to emergency conditions or isolated locations. 81st Congress, House Report No. 557.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 706 was renumbered section 3706 of this title.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 146 of this title as this section.

1986—Pub. L. 99–640 substituted "United States Postal Service" for "Postmaster General".

1976—Pub. L. 94–546 substituted "United States Postal Service" for "Post Office Department" in section catchline.
#### § 201.96 Unauthorized disclosure of business information prohibited.

No agent or employee of the United States shall, without the consent of the stockyard owner, market agency, dealer, packer, swine contractor, or live poultry dealer concerned, divulge or make known in any manner, any facts or information regarding the business of such person acquired through any examination or inspection of the business or records of the stockyard owner, market agency, dealer, packer, swine contractor, or live poultry dealer, or through any information given by the stockyard owner, market agency, dealer, packer, swine contractor, or live poultry dealer pursuant to the Act and regulations, except to such other agents or employees of the United States as may be required to have such knowledge in the regular course of their official duties or except insofar as they may be directed by the Administrator or by a court of competent jurisdiction, or except as they may be otherwise required by law.

[73 FR 62440, Oct. 21, 2008]
#### § 93.408 Inspection at the port of entry.

Inspection shall be made at the port of entry of all ruminants imported from any part of the world except as provided in § 93.421. All ruminants found to be free from communicable disease and not to have been exposed thereto within 60 days prior to their exportation to the United States shall be admitted subject to the other provisions in this part; all other ruminants except as provided in §§ 93.423(c) and 93.427(a) shall be refused entry. Ruminants refused entry, unless exported within a time fixed in each case by the Administrator, and in accordance with other provisions he or she may require in each case for their handling shall be disposed of as the Administrator may direct in accordance with the Animal Health Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 8301 *et seq.*). Such portions of the transporting vessel, and of its cargo, which have been exposed to any such ruminants or their emanations shall be disinfected in such manner as may be considered necessary by the inspector in charge at the port of entry, to prevent the introduction or spread of livestock or poultry disease, before the cargo is allowed to land.

[55 FR 31495, Aug. 2, 1990. Redesignated and amended at 62 FR 56012, 56018, Oct. 28, 1997; 68 FR 6344, Feb. 7, 2003; 85 FR 57952, Sept. 17, 2020]
FORM RD 2006-46 (Rev. 01-98)

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE MANUAL ISSUE No.

RURAL DEVELOPMENT WSAL PN 584

Washington, D.C 20250 DATE

June 9, 2023 

PROCEDURE NOTICE

RD MANUAL CHANGES

INSERT RD INS 1944-N HOUSING PRESERVATION GRANTS. This

(WSAL) Instruction is revised as follows:

Exhibit C: 

- Clarify Exhibit G procedures.

- Remove obsoleted Form AD-622. 

- Update deobligation guidance per AN 4891 “Updates for Unliquidated Obligation 

Process” issued 01/13/2023.

- Update when RD Instruction 2000-FF is issued to applicants. 

Exhibit H - to add review date, name and signature of reviewer.

Exhibit I: 

- Move issuance of RD Instruction 2000-FF PMOA from the servicing to the 

preapplication section of the checklist.

- Clarify Exhibit G procedures.

- Remove obsoleted Form AD-622. 

- Updated obligation guidance per RD AN 4891 “Updates for Unliquidated Obligation 

Process” issued 01/13/2023.

- Included the Type Of Assistance (TOA) code for persistent poverty.

- Updated closing instructions.

- Updated grant closeout section to include the new Exhibit L template letters for 

grant closeout.

Exhibit K – to add review date, name and signature of reviewer.

Exhibit L - Templates” Exhibits L-6 and L-7 has been added to issue two grant 

closeout letter templates.

REMOVE INSERT

Exhibit C; Exhibit C revised; 

Exhibit H; Exhibit H revised; 

Exhibit I; Exhibit I revised; 

Exhibit K. Exhibit K revised; 

Exhibit L-6 and L-7 added 06-09-23. 

oOo

READ PROCEDURE - DISCUSS IN STAFF CONFERENCE - KEEP PROCEDURE MANUAL UP TO DATE
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1269

To provide that the Federal Government and States shall be subject to

the same procedures and substantive laws that would apply to persons

on whose behalf certain civil actions may be brought, and for other

purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 23, 1999

Mr. MCCONNELL (for himself and Mr. HATCH) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To provide that the Federal Government and States shall

be subject to the same procedures and substantive laws

that would apply to persons on whose behalf certain

civil actions may be brought, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Litigation Fairness

5 Act of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITION.

7 In this Act, the term ‘‘State’’ means any State of the

8 United States, the District of Columbia, the Common-
2

•S 1269 IS

1 wealth of Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands, the

2 Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, and any other

3 territory or possession of the United States, and any de4 partment or political division thereof (including any mu5 nicipality, town, township, or county).

6 SEC. 3. GOVERNMENTAL RECOUPMENT ACTIONS.

7 In any civil action in which the United States, or any

8 State that accepts Federal funds, seeks to recover directly

9 from any defendant, to the extent permitted by applicable

10 Federal or State law, any benefits or services the United

11 States or such State has provided or paid for or is obli12 gated directly or indirectly to provide or pay for on behalf

13 of another person, the United States or such State shall

14 be subject to the same procedural rules and substantive

15 law (including notification requirements, limitations, and

16 affirmative defenses) that would apply to a claim brought

17 against such defendant by the person on whose behalf the

18 benefits or services were provided or paid or are obligated

19 to be provided or paid.

20 SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.

21 This Act shall take effect on the date of enactment

22 of this Act and shall apply to any civil action the trial

23 of which has not begun before the date of enactment of

24 this Act.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q FOR
THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001063698
<NAME> ALLIANCE LAUNDRY HOLDINGS LLC
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       4,883,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               34,262,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (272,000)
<INVENTORY>                                 31,774,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            78,318,000
<PP&E>                                     170,207,000
<DEPRECIATION>                           (109,586,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             222,445,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       44,622,000
<BONDS>                                    320,546,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        6,000,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    50,645,000
<OTHER-SE>                               (200,467,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               222,445,000
<SALES>                                     79,288,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            79,288,000
<CGS>                                       58,790,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               58,790,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                90,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           8,040,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,490,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,490,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,490,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Wendy L. Woleben, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Marilyn J. Noftsker, Deceased, Appellant, v Pragna B. Sutaria, M.D., et al., Defendants, and Thomas L. Greer, M.D., Respondent.

[825 NYS2d 860]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Chautauqua County (John T. Ward, Jr., A.J.), entered August 18, 2005 in a medical malpractice and wrongful death action. The order granted the motion of defendant Thomas L. Greer, M.D. to dismiss the complaint against him.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motion is denied, the complaint against defendant Thomas L. Greer, M.D. is reinstated and the second affirmative defense insofar as it concerns that defendant is dismissed.

*1296Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for the personal injuries sustained by Marilyn J. Noftsker and her wrongful death, which allegedly were caused by acts of medical malpractice on the part of defendants. We agree with plaintiff that Supreme Court erred in granting the motion of Thomas L. Greer, M.D. (defendant) seeking dismissal of the complaint against him on the ground of improper service of process. Defendant failed to move to dismiss the complaint against him on that ground within 60 days after having served an answer setting forth an objection to service and thus waived that objection *(see B.N. Realty Assoc. v Lichtenstein,*21 AD3d 793, 796 [2005]; *Dimond v Verdon,*5 AD3d 718, 719 [2004]; *Aretakis v Tarantino,*300 AD2d 160 [2002]). We further agree with plaintiff that defendant did not demonstrate the requisite “undue hardship” to justify the extension of defendant’s time for moving to dismiss the action on the ground of improper service (CPLR 3211 [e]; *see B.N. Realty Assoc.,*21 AD3d at 796-797; *State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v Firmstone,*18 AD3d 900, 902 [2005]; *WorldCom, Inc. v Dialing Loving Care,*269 AD2d 159 [2000]). Present—Hurlbutt, A.P.J., Kehoe, Smith and Green, JJ.
# C_2012273EN.01002302.xml

| 8.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 273/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 273/23

---

Order of the General Court of 10 July 2012 — Prima TV v Commission

(Case T-504/10) (1)

1

2012/C 273/40

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 346, 18.12.2010.

1

---