Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement

          - 30 CFR Part 938
          - [PA-157-FOR; OSM 2010-0011]

# AGENCY:

Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM), Interior.

# ACTION:

Proposed rule; public comment period and opportunity for public hearing on removal of required amendment.

# SUMMARY:

We are announcing receipt of a request to remove a required amendment to the Pennsylvania regulatory program (the “Pennsylvania program”) under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA or the Act). In response to a required program amendment codified in the Federal regulations, Pennsylvania has submitted rationale that it believes supports its position that current program provisions are sufficient to render its program no less effective than the Federal requirements and, therefore, no amendment is necessary. The required amendment pertains to regulatory exemptions for coal extraction incidental to the extraction of other minerals.

This document gives the times and locations that the Pennsylvania program and this submittal are available for your inspection, the comment period during which you may submit written comments, and the procedures that we will follow for the public hearing, if one is requested.

# DATES:

We will accept written comments until 4 p.m., local time April 8, 2011. If requested, we will hold a public hearing on April 4, 2011. We will accept requests to speak until 4 p.m., local time on March 24, 2011.

# ADDRESSES:

You may submit comments, identified by “PA-157-FOR; Docket ID: OSM-2010-0011” by either of the following two methods:

*Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.*                         The proposed rule has been assigned Docket ID: OSM-2010-0011. If you would like to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking Portal, go to                         *http://www.regulations.gov*                         and follow the instructions.                    

*Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier:*                         Mr. George Rieger, Chief, Pittsburgh Field Division, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Harrisburg Transportation Center, 415 Market St., Suite 304, Harrisburg, PA 17101.                    

*Instructions:*                         For detailed instructions on submitting comments and additional information on the rulemaking process,                         *see*                         the “Public Comment Procedures” heading of the                         **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION**                         section of this document.                    

*Docket:*                         In addition to obtaining copies of documents at                         *http://www.regulations.gov,*                         information may also be obtained at the addresses listed below during normal business hours, Monday through Friday, excluding holidays. You may receive one free copy of the amendment by contacting OSM's Pittsburgh Field Division Office.                    

                        George Rieger, Chief, Pittsburgh Field Division, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Harrisburg Transportation Center, 415 Market St., Suite 304, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17101,                         *Telephone:*                         (717) 782-4036,                         *E-mail: grieger@osmre.gov.*

                        Thomas Callaghan, P.G., Director, Bureau of Mining and Reclamation, Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, Rachel Carson State Office Building, P.O. Box 8461, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17105-8461,                         *Telephone:*                         (717) 787-5103,                         *E-mail: tcallaghan@state.pa.us.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        George Rieger,                         *Telephone:*                         (717) 782-4036.                         *E-mail: grieger@osmre.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background on the Pennsylvania Program

II. Description of the Request

III. Public Comment Procedures

IV. Procedural Determinations

## I. Background on the Pennsylvania Program

                    Section 503(a) of the Act permits a State to assume primacy for the                           ( print page 12921)                        regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations on non-Federal and non-Indian lands within its borders by demonstrating that its program includes, among other things, “a State law which provides for the regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations in accordance with the requirements of this Act * * *; and rules and regulations consistent with regulations issued by the Secretary pursuant to this Act.”                     *See*30 U.S.C. 1253(a)(1) and (7). On the basis of these criteria, the Secretary of the Interior conditionally approved the Pennsylvania program on July 30, 1982. You can find background information on the Pennsylvania program, including the Secretary's findings, the disposition of comments, and conditions of approval of the Pennsylvania program in the July 30, 1982,                     **Federal Register**                     (47 FR 33050). You can also find later actions concerning the Pennsylvania program and program amendments at 30 CFR 938.11, 938.12, 938.13, 938.15, and 938.16.                

## II. Description of the Request

                    By letter dated August 6, 2010 (Administrative Record Number PA 892.12), Pennsylvania sent us a response to a program amendment that was required by OSMRE in a final rule notice published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on November 7, 1997, (62 FR 60177) and codified in the Federal Regulations at 30 CFR 938.16(uuu). This required amendment provided that Pennsylvania submit an amendment to provide counterparts to the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 702.15(d), (e), (f), and 702.17(c)(2), and (c)(3). The Federal regulations pertain to (1) conditions of exemption and right of inspection and entry; and (2) revocation and enforcement. Pennsylvania submits that its regulatory program already contains counterparts to the Federal regulations and, therefore, is no less effective than the Federal regulations pertaining to incidental coal extraction. Pennsylvania requests that we remove the condition found at 30 CFR 938.16(uuu) on this basis.                

Pennsylvania is submitting the request that includes three parts: (1) Environmental Hearing Board Act (35 P.S. Sections 7511-7516); (2) 25 Pa Code Chapter 1021; and (3) 25 Pa Code 77.352. In summary, the Federal regulations and PADEP rationale are provided as follows:

*Federal Regulations:*30 CFR 702.15, Conditions of Exemption and Right of Inspection and Entry, provides with regard to exemptions for coal extraction incidental to the extraction of other minerals, authorized representatives of the regulatory authority and Secretary the right to conduct inspections of operations claiming exemption. The representatives have the right of entry to any mining and reclamation operations without advance notice or search warrants, access to and copies of any relevant records, and to gather physical and photographic evidence. A search warrant may be required for entry into a building.                

*PADEP Response:*                     OSM's review of 25 Pennsylvania Code (Pa Code) Section 86.5 in the 1997 rulemaking did not include a discussion of the need for 25 Pa Code Section 86.5 to be revised to add counterparts to the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 702.15(d), (e), and (f). Thus, it is not clear why OSM considered 25 Pa Code Section 86.5 to be less effective than the Federal regulations with respect to the right to conduct inspections and right of entry for operations extracting coal incidental to surface mining.                

Pennsylvania submits that its regulatory program, upon approval of the program amendment incorporating 25 Pa Code Section 77.352, will contain counterparts to 30 CFR 702.15(d), (e), and (f), and, therefore, is no less effective than the Federal regulations pertaining to incidental coal extraction.

                    Section 86.5(a) requires that a person who intends to extract coal incidental to the extraction of other minerals “shall do so under the provisions of a noncoal surface mining permit issued under Chapter 77 (relating to noncoal mining) and subject to the conditions described in this section.” A person who seeks to engage in incidental coal extraction is required to obtain a noncoal surface mining permit pursuant to Pennsylvania's Noncoal Surface Mining Conservation and Reclamation Act, 52 P.S. Section 3301                     *et seq.*                     (NSMCRA) and the regulations in 25 Pa Code Chapter 77 which implement NSMCRA. Thus, all persons conducting incidental coal extraction under Chapter 86.5 must comply with, and are subject to, the provision of NSMCRA and 25 Pa Code Chapter 77. Section 3314 of NSMCRA provides: “The department shall have the right to enter and inspect all surface mining operations for the purpose of determining conditions of health or safety and for compliance with the provisions of this act and all rules and regulations promulgated pursuant thereto.” 52 P.S. Section 3314. According to Pennsylvania, this statutory provision and the implementing regulations in Chapter 77.352, clearly constitute a counterpart to 30 CFR 702.15(d) that is at least no less effective than the Federal regulation.                

Sections 702.15(e) and (f) elaborate on the right of authorized representatives of the regulatory authority to conduct inspections of sites conducting incidental coal extraction. Pennsylvania's noncoal mining regulations in 25 Pa Code Chapter 77, (which persons claiming exemption under 25 Pa Code Section 86.5 are subject to pursuant to 25 Pa Code Section 86.5(a)), provide counterparts to the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 702.15(d), (e), and (f). Section 77.352(a)(1) states that the Department and its agents and employees “will have access to, and require the production of, books and papers, documents, and physical evidence pertinent to a matter under investigation.” Further 77.352(a)(2) states that Department representatives have the right to “enter a building, property, premises, or place where noncoal mining activities are conducted for the purpose of making an investigation or inspection as may be necessary to ascertain the compliance or noncompliance by a person with the environmental acts and the act and regulations thereunder.” These provisions in 25 Pa Code Chapter 77 provide counterparts to 30 CFR 702.15(d), (e), and (f), and, according to Pennsylvania, provide broader authority to Pennsylvania's authorized representatives given that they may enter a building at a surface mine site for the purposes of inspection or investigation without being required to obtain a search warrant. These requirements extend to OSM in their role as oversight agent for the primacy coal mining program. Pennsylvania therefore submits that its regulatory program, upon approval of the program amendment incorporating 25 Pa Code 77.352, will contain counterparts to 30 CFR 702.15(d), (e), and (f) which are no less effective than the Federal regulations.

*Federal Regulations:*30 CFR 702.17, Revocation and Enforcement, provides that the regulatory authority may revoke the exemption, if the operator has not established that the activities conducted in the mining area qualify for an exemption. An administrative review of a decision whether to revoke an exemption may be requested by any adversely affected person within 30 days of notification. Lastly, the petition for administrative review will not suspend the effect of the decision of whether to revoke an exemption.                

*PADEP's Response:*                     OSM's required amendment at 30 CFR 938.16(uuu) with respect to Pennsylvania counterparts for 30 CFR 702.17(c)(2) and (c)(3) also was not discussed in the 1997 rulemaking. More importantly, this part of the                           ( print page 12922)                        required amendment actually conflicts with OSM's own findings in the 1997 rulemaking.                

                    In the 1997 rulemaking, OSM determined that 25 Pa Code Section 86.5(o) is identical in meaning to 30 CFR 702.17(c)(2); and that 25 Pa Code Section 86.5(n) is identical in meaning to 30 CFR 702.17(c)(3).                     *See***Federal Register**                     (62 FR 60169-70 and Table A). OSM then concluded: “Because the above proposed revisions (listed in Table A) are identical in meaning to the corresponding Federal regulations, the Director finds that Pennsylvania's proposed rules are no less effective than the Federal rules.” Thus, the portion of 30 CFR 938.16(uuu) pertaining to counterparts to 30 CFR 702.17(c)(2) and (c)(3) appears to be an error and should be rescinded by OSM on that basis alone.                

                    In any event, Pennsylvania submits that its regulatory program already contains counterparts to 30 CFR 702.17(c)(2) and (c)(3). As previously recognized by OSM in the 1997 Rulemaking, Pennsylvania has regulations which provide for administrative review of Department determinations concerning exemption for incidental coal extraction.                     *See***Federal Register**                     (62 FR 60170). A Department determination to revoke an exemption for incidental coal extraction under Chapter 86.5 would constitute a final action of the Department, which would be appealable to the Environmental Hearing Board.                     *See*                     35 P.S. 7511-7516 (Environmental Hearing Board Act); 35 P.S. 7514 (“no action of the department adversely affecting a person shall be final as to that person until the person has had the opportunity to appeal the action to the board”); 25 Pa. Code Chapter 1021 (Environmental Hearing Board procedural rules); 25 Pa. Code Chapter 1021.2 (defining “action” of the department), Chapter 1021.51 (commencement of an appeal). These statutory and regulatory sections regarding the right of appeal to the Pennsylvania Environmental Hearing Board provide counterparts to 30 CFR 702.17(c)(2).                

                    Pennsylvania also has counterparts to 30 CFR 702.17(c)(3). The Environmental Hearing Board Act states: “No appeal shall act as an automatic supersedeas.” 35 P.S. 7514(d).                     *See*                     also 25 Pa. Code Chapter 1021.61. In the 1997 Rulemaking, OSM stated as follows with respect to Chapter 86.5(I)(3): In its letter dated March 28, 1997, Pennsylvania stated that appeals to the Environmental Hearing Board (EHB) under the provisions of Chapter 21 [now Chapter 1021] do not stay the effect of the Department of Environmental Protection's (Department) actions. If an appellant wishes to stay the effect of such an action, the appellant must petition the EHB which, in turn, must issue a supersedeas. The Director finds the proposed Pennsylvania regulation no less effective than the Federal regulations, since Pennsylvania law provides, generally, that an appeal does not, by itself, suspend the effect of the decision appealed from.                     *See***Federal Register**                     (62 FR 60170). Pennsylvania contends that this same rationale applies to the required counterpart to 30 CFR 702.17(c)(3). Pennsylvania law provides, generally, that an appeal does not, by itself, suspend the effect of the decision appealed from. Therefore, Pennsylvania submits that its regulatory program, upon approval of the program amendment incorporating, will contain counterparts to 30 CFR 702.17(c)(2) and (c)(3), which are no less effective than the Federal regulations.                

## III. Public Comment Procedures

Under the provisions of 30 CFR 732.17(h), we are seeking your comments on whether the submission satisfies the applicable program approval criteria of 30 CFR 732.15. If we approve the amendment, it will become part of the Pennsylvania program.

### Electronic or Written Comments

                    If you submit written comments, they should be specific, confined to issues pertinent to the proposed regulations, and explain the reason for any recommended change(s). We appreciate any and all comments, but those most useful and likely to influence decisions on the final regulations will be those that either involve personal experience or include citations to and analyses of SMCRA, its legislative history, its implementing regulations, case law, other pertinent Tribal or Federal laws or regulations, technical literature, or other relevant publications. We cannot ensure that comments received after the close of the comment period (                    *see***DATES**                    ) or sent to an address other than those listed above (                    *see***ADDRESSES**                    ) will be included in the docket for this rulemaking and considered.                

### Public Availability of Comments

Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you may ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. We will not consider anonymous comments.

### Public Hearing

                    If you wish to speak at the public hearing, contact the person listed under                     **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**                     by 4 p.m., local time March 24, 2011. If you are disabled and need reasonable accommodations to attend a public hearing, contact the person listed under                     **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**                    . We will arrange the location and time of the hearing with those persons requesting the hearing. If no one requests an opportunity to speak, we will not hold the hearing. To assist the transcriber and ensure an accurate record, we request, if possible, that each person who speaks at a public hearing provide us with a written copy of his or her comments. The public hearing will continue on the specified date until everyone scheduled to speak has been given an opportunity to be heard. If you are in the audience and have not been scheduled to speak and wish to do so, you will be allowed to speak after those who have been scheduled. We will end the hearing after everyone scheduled to speak and others present in the audience who wish to speak, have been heard.                

### Public Meeting

                    If there is only limited interest in participating in a public hearing, we may hold a public meeting rather than a public hearing. If you wish to meet with us to discuss the submission, please request a meeting by contacting the person listed under                     **FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT**                    . All such meetings are open to the public and, if possible, we will post notices of meetings at the locations listed under                     **ADDRESSES**                    . We will make a written summary of each meeting a part of the administrative record.                

## IV. Procedural Determinations

### Executive Order 12866—Regulatory Planning and Review

This rule is exempted from review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under Executive Order 12866.

### Other Laws and Executive Orders Affecting Rulemaking

                    When a State submits a program amendment to OSM for review, our regulations at 30 CFR 732.17(h) require us to publish a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     indicating receipt of the proposed amendment, its text or a summary of its terms, and an opportunity for public comment. We conclude our review of the proposed amendment after the close of the public comment period and determine whether                           ( print page 12923)                        the amendment should be approved, approved in part, or not approved. At that time, we will also make the determinations and certifications required by the various laws and executive orders governing the rulemaking process and include them in the final rule.                

# List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 938

      - Intergovernmental relations
      - Surface mining
      - Underground mining

Dated: November 24, 2010.

Thomas D. Shope,

Regional Director, Appalachian Region.

[FR Doc. 2011-5404 Filed 3-8-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-05-P