alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.7


                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1
                                     TO THE
                   WESTERN ATLAS SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN


         Pursuant to the provisions of Section 13 thereof, the Western Atlas
Supplemental Retirement Plan as amended by restatement in its entirety effective
as of November 13, 1997 (the "Plan") is hereby further amended in the following
respects only:

         The Plan is hereby  amended to add a new Section 21 immediately
following Section 20 of the Plan to read as follows:

         Section 21 - Special Change of Control Provisions

         (a) Any provision of this Plan to the contrary notwithstanding, if a
Participant is a party to a Change of Control Employment Agreement with the
Parent (the "Agreement") or is a participant in the Western Atlas Inc. Executive
Severance Plan (the "ES Plan") and such Participant's employment terminates
under circumstances resulting in the payment of a lump sum amount to the
Participant pursuant to Section 6(a)(i) of the Agreement or the receipt of
Separation Benefits by such Participant under the ES Plan, then following such
termination of employment each benefit payable under the Plan to or with respect
to such Participant shall be determined and paid when otherwise due under the
Plan without regard to any provision of the Plan relating to eligibility for the
payment of such benefit that provides for or requires:

                  (i)      the consent of the Committee;

                  (ii)     the entering into of a consulting agreement with the
Company; or

                  (iii)    a forfeiture of benefits because the Participant
engages in or becomes employed by another enterprise which is directly or
indirectly competitive with the Company or products (or services) in which it
deals or proposes to deal, or the Participant violates the agreements described
in Section 3, Section 5(a)(iii) or the terms of his consulting agreement, if
any, with the Company.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed as of the 18th day
of February, 1998, to be effective as of January 1, 1998.

                              WESTERN ATLAS INTERNATIONAL INC.



                              By:        /s/ William H. Flores
                                        ----------------------------------------
                              Title:    Senior Vice President
                                        ----------------------------------------
### §260. Congressional declaration of policy; adoption and observance of uniform standard of time; authority of Secretary of Transportation

It is the policy of the United States to promote the adoption and observance of uniform time within the standard time zones prescribed by sections 261 to 264 of this title, as modified by section 265 of this title. To this end the Secretary of Transportation is authorized and directed to foster and promote widespread and uniform adoption and observance of the same standard of time within and throughout each such standard time zone.

(Pub. L. 89–387, §2, Apr. 13, 1966, 80 Stat. 107; Pub. L. 97–449, §2(c), Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2439.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1983—Pub. L. 97–449 substituted "Secretary of Transportation" for "Interstate Commerce Commission".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 89–387, §6, Apr. 13, 1966, 80 Stat. 108, provided that: "This Act [enacting this section and sections 260a, 266, and 267 of this title and amending sections 261 to 263 of this title] shall take effect on April 1, 1967; except that if any State, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any possession of the United States, or any political subdivision thereof, observes daylight saving time in the year 1966, such time shall advance the standard time otherwise applicable in such place by one hour and shall commence at 2 o'clock antemeridian on the last Sunday in April of the year 1966 and shall end at 2 o'clock antemeridian on the last Sunday in October of the year 1966."

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 89–387, §1, Apr. 13, 1966, 80 Stat. 107, provided: "That this Act [enacting this section and sections 260a, 266, and 267 of this title and amending sections 261 to 263 of this title] may be cited as the 'Uniform Time Act of 1966'."
# C_2007096EN.01001801.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/18

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 April 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic

(Case C-313/06) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Directive 2004/26/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 amending Directive 97/68/EC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to measures against the emission of gaseous and particulate pollutants from internal combustion engines to be installed in non-road mobile machinery - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

(2007/C 96/30)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: D. Lawunmi and D. Recchia, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Italian Republic (represented by: I.M. Braguglia and M. Fiorilli, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Failure to adopt, within the prescribed period, the provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/26/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 amending Directive 97/68/EC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to measures against the emission of gaseous and particulate pollutants from internal combustion engines to be installed in non-road mobile machinery (OJ 2004 L 146, p. 1)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/26/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 amending Directive 97/68/EC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to measures against the emission of gaseous and particulate pollutants from internal combustion engines to be installed in non-road mobile machinery, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2004/26/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 amending Directive 97/68/EC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to measures against the emission of gaseous and particulate pollutants from internal combustion engines to be installed in non-road mobile machinery, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive.

| 2. | Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs of the proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 212, 2.9.2006.

1

---
### §1458. Cooperation with State authorities; transmittal of regulations to States; noninterference with existing programs

(a) A copy of each regulation promulgated under this chapter shall be transmitted promptly to the Secretary of Commerce, who shall (1) transmit copies thereof to all appropriate State officers and agencies, and (2) furnish to such State officers and agencies information and assistance to promote to the greatest practicable extent uniformity in State and Federal regulation of the labeling of consumer commodities.

(b) Nothing contained in this section shall be construed to impair or otherwise interfere with any program carried into effect by the Secretary of Health and Human Services under other provisions of law in cooperation with State governments or agencies, instrumentalities, or political subdivisions thereof.

(Pub. L. 89–755, §9, Nov. 3, 1966, 80 Stat. 1301; Pub. L. 96–88, title V, §509(b), Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 695.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Secretary of Health and Human Services" substituted for "Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare" in subsec. (b) pursuant to section 509(b) of Pub. L. 96–88, which is classified to section 3508(b) of Title 20, Education.
J-S55022-14

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

Appellee

v.

MALIK MANDRUM A/K/A MALIK 

MANGRUM,

Appellant No. 3259 EDA 2013

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence June 26, 2013

In the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County

Criminal Division at No(s): CP-51-CR-0011828-2012

BEFORE: BOWES, SHOGAN, and OTT, JJ.

CONCURRING STATEMENT BY BOWES, J.: FILED FEBRUARY 04, 2015

For reasons more fully outlined in my concurring decision in 

Commonwealth v. Bizzel, 2014 PA Super 267, I concur in the result.
### **CHAPTER 45A—CHRYSLER CORPORATION LOAN GUARANTEE**
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1




                    CHIEF EXECUTIVE CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                  In connection with the Annual Report of National Dentex
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2002
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, David L. Brown, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

By:/s/ David L. Brown
   ---------------------
David L. Brown
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
March 10, 2003
1 

# Memo

To: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0799 From: Joseph McDonald, U.S. EPA-OTAQ-ASD CC: Ed Nam, U.S. EPA-OTAQ-ASD Date: October 6, 2010 Re: Technical papers on the Argonne National Laboratory Battery Cost Model
Hard copies of papers presented at the 2009 EVS -24 conference and pending publication at the 2010 EVS-25 conference regarding the Argonne National Laborator y Battery Cost Model are available within EPA’s Docket Center. The specific citations are:

• Nelson, P.A., Santini, D.J., Barnes, J. "Factors Determining the Manufact uring Costs of LithiumIon Batteries for PHEVs," 24t h World Battery, Hybrid and Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Symposium and Exposition EVS- 24, Stavenger, Norway, May 13 -16, 2009 (www.evs24.org).

• Santini, D.J., Gallagher, K.G., and Nelson, P.A. "M odeling of Manufacturing Costs of Lithium-Ion Batteries for HEVs, PHEVs, and EVs," Paper to be presented at the 25th World Battery, Hybrid and Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Symposium and Exposition, EVS-25, Shenzhen, China, November 5-9, 2010 (www.evs25.org). Advanc e draft provided by D. J. Santini, Argonne National Laboratory, August 24, 2010. The documents have been copyrighted and are not avai lable within the electronic docket. Parties that wish to view hard copies of th ese documents can do so at the at the EPA Docket Center: Air and Radiation Docket and In formation Center, EPA/DC, EPA West, R oom 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington DC. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566- 1744, and the telephone number for the Air Docket is (202) 566-1742.
#### § 93.320 Horses from or transiting through Central America and the West Indies.

Horses from or transiting through Central America and the West Indies shall be inspected as provided in § 93.306; shall be accompanied by a certificate and otherwise handled as provided in § 93.314; and shall be quarantined and tested as provided in § 93.308(a), (b) and (c): *Provided,* That any such horses that are found to be infested with fever ticks, Boophilus annulatus, shall not be permitted entry until they have been freed therefrom by dipping in a permitted arsenical solution or by other treatment approved by the Administrator.

[55 FR 31495, Aug. 2, 1990. Redesignated and amended at 62 FR 56012, 56017, Oct. 28, 1997; 88 FR 63004, Sept. 14, 2023]
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-21-00347-CV

Steven SCHAAF,

Appellant

v.

CHRISTUS SANTA ROSA HEALTH CARE CORPORATION a/k/a Christus Santa Rosa 

Health System and Christus Health,

Appellees

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020CI19278

Honorable Laura Salinas, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. 

We ORDER all costs of this appeal assessed against appellant, Steven Schaaf. 

SIGNED October 27, 2021.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice
### §275a. Service charges

The Secretary shall charge for services performed under the authority of section 273 of this title, except in cases where he determines that the interest of the Government would be best served by waiving the charge. Such charges may be based upon fixed prices or costs. The appropriation or fund bearing the cost of the services may be reimbursed, or the Secretary may require advance payment subject to such adjustment on completion of the work as may be agreed upon.

(Mar. 3, 1901, ch. 872, §7, as added Aug. 3, 1956, ch. 906, §1, 70 Stat. 959.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Provisions relating to fees were formerly contained in section 276 of this title.
#### John F. Slater, Appellant, v. Louise Grannemann, Personally and as Administratrix, etc., of Christian Grannemann, Deceased, and Others, Impleaded with Anna M. Grannemann and Others. Respondents.

(No. 1.)

Order affirmed,'-with ten dollars costs and disbursements, Upon the ground that the judgment is one, of nonsuit, and not upon the merits. All concurred.
Chris Bardenhagen, PhD

Of

Michigan

Chris Bardenhagen, a farm industry appointee, is part owner and operator of a sixth 

generation, 80-acre family farm that produces apples and table grapes for local and regional 

sales, as well as a variety of tree fruit for the farm stand. Mr. Bardenhagen has decades of 

experience as a farm advocate, producer, and researcher. His recent PhD at Michigan State 

University allowed him to gain expertise on regional value chain business development. He has 

an extensive knowledge of cooperative farming systems, specialty crop marketing, and farmerled decision-making processes. He is a former board member of the Michigan Organic Food 

and Farm Alliance and the East Lansing Food Cooperative and has served as a grant reviewer 

for NCR-SARE.
### §5561. Definitions

For purposes of this part, the following definitions shall apply:

#### (1) Bureau investigation

The term "Bureau investigation" means any inquiry conducted by a Bureau investigator for the purpose of ascertaining whether any person is or has been engaged in any conduct that is a violation, as defined in this section.

#### (2) Bureau investigator

The term "Bureau investigator" means any attorney or investigator employed by the Bureau who is charged with the duty of enforcing or carrying into effect any Federal consumer financial law.

#### (3) Custodian

The term "custodian" means the custodian or any deputy custodian designated by the Bureau.

#### (4) Documentary material

The term "documentary material" includes the original or any copy of any book, document, record, report, memorandum, paper, communication, tabulation, chart, logs, electronic files, or other data or data compilations stored in any medium.

#### (5) Violation

The term "violation" means any act or omission that, if proved, would constitute a violation of any provision of Federal consumer financial law.

(Pub. L. 111–203, title X, §1051, July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 2018.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 111–203, title X, §1058, July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 2035, provided that: "This subtitle [subtitle E (§§1051–1058), enacting this part] shall become effective on the designated transfer date."

[The term "designated transfer date" is defined in section 5481(9) of this title as the date established under section 5582 of this title.]
§ 540.1 Dead fish. ( a ) With the exception of dead fish that have died en route to an official establishment that have been received with live fish at the official establishment, and that are subject to sorting and disposal at the official establishment, no fish or part of the carcass of fish that died otherwise than by slaughter may be brought onto the premises of an official establishment without advance permission from the FSIS frontline supervisor.
( b ) The official establishment shall maintain physical separation between slaughtered fish and the edible parts or products of slaughtered fish and any fish or parts of fish that have died otherwise than by slaughter. Fish or any parts of fish that have died otherwise than by slaughter shall be excluded from any room or compartment in which edible product is prepared, handled, or stored.
P M AI R 11 ^ 1515 Tongass Ave Phone (907) 225-3845 ext. 339 

• iw i a-UB'v y ^M«^ ^ ^.^ , ,r-.,T r^^ Ketchikan, AK 99901 Fax (907)225-3848 

••"•-vA.RIMENTOF 

^ •• '\NSP0RTAT10N 

,:.; -^r T oPtR/vnoNS 

October 17, 2011 'Qli HCI 2U A ^-55 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building ground floor, 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE. 

Washington, DC 20590 

RE: Extension of Fyemptinn 476QM Docket MQ FAA-2nni-035:1 

Dear Administrator: 

PM AIR LLC dba Promech Air request an extension of Exemption 4760M from Part § 135.203 

(a)(1) of Title 14 CFR, which allows PM AIR LLC to operate seaplanes inside the ketchikan, 

Alaska, Class E airspace Special Visual Flight Rules (SVFR) below 500 feet above the 

surface. 

PMAIR LLC dba Promech Air states that the facts, conditions, circumstances, and reasons 

remain the same as presented in the original exemption and subsequent petitions for 

extension. Additionally, PM AIR LLC has operated successfully under this exemption since 

the date of decision by the FAA. 

PM AIR LLC dba Promech Air request that the renewal of this exemption not be delayed by 

publishing in the Federal Register and states that this will not set a precedent. 

Your timely extension of the exemption, which expires on February 28, 2012, will allow us to 

continue to provide safe, efficient, and timely air commerce to the traveling public. 

Authority to conduct in accordance with this exemption is in the public interest. 

Your assistance in this matter appreciated. 

Best regards, 

Tony Dupea 

Chief Pilot 

PM AIR LLC dba Promech Air 

cc: Jon Percy POI 

FAA/FSDO-05 

Juneau, Alaska
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

**SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350,CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE**

 

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), theundersigned officers of Corgenix Medical Corporation, a Nevada corporation (the“Company”), does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report ofCorgenix Medical Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,2010 as filed with the Securities an Exchange Commission (the “10-Q Report”)that:

 

i.        the 10-Q Report fullycomplies with the guidance of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

ii.     the informationcontained in the 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of we.

 

Dated:    May 13, 2010

 

**This Certification is made solely for purposes of 18U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein,and not for any other purpose.**

 

**A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to we and willbe retained by we and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request. This written statement shall not be deemed to be “filed”as part of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q that it accompanies.**

 
| /s/ Douglass T. Simpson                            |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| President and Chief  Executive Officer             |   |
|                                               |   |
| /s/ William H.  Critchfield                        |   |
| Senior Vice President  and Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
Exhibit 13.3
------------
                    PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     In connection with this Annual Report of Frontline Ltd (the "Company") on
Form 20-F for the annual period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Inger M. Klemp, the Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.

Date:  July 2, 2007

/s/ Inger M. Klemp
----------------------------
Inger M. Klemp
Principal Financial Officer
Sanitized Process Description
#### BARCELIZA G. CRUZ, individually and on behalf of her infant child RICHARD ANTHONY CRUZ, Appellee v. JOHN W. ASHY, Appellant

Civil No. 55-A

District Court of Guam Appellate Division

September 1, 1967

*Counsel for Appellee:*Finton J. Phelan, Jr.

*Counsel for Appellant:*E. R. Crain and Richard H. Benson

Before SHRIVER, *Judge,*District Court of Guam; FUR-BER, *Chief Justice,*High Court of the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands; DUEÑAS, *Judge,*Island Court of Guam

PER CURIAM

OPINION

This is an appeal from the Island Court of Guam, which Court held that the defendant-appellant is the father of Richard Anthony Cruz who was born out of wedlock to the plaintiff-appellee, Barceliza G. Cruz. The only ground alleged for reversal is that the evidence did not support the judgment of the Court.

We have examined the record, transcript of evidence, and heard oral argument. We are of the view that the evidence amply supports the judgment of the Court below and such judgment is therefore affirmed.