alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 55.7 Claims not allowed. ( a ) The Department will not allow claims arising out of the destruction of cervids unless the cervids have been appraised as prescribed in this part and the owners have signed the appraisal form indicating agreement with the appraisal amount as required by § 55.3(c) of this part.
( b ) The Department will not allow claims arising out of the destruction of cervids unless the owners have signed a written agreement with APHIS in which they agree that if they maintain cervids in the future on the premises used for cervids for which indemnity is paid, they will maintain the cervids in accordance with a herd plan and will not introduce cervids onto the premises until after the date specified in that herd plan. Persons who violate this written agreement may be subject to civil and criminal penalties.
( c ) The Department will not allow claims arising out of the destruction of cervids that have been moved or handled by the owner or a representative of the owner in violation of a law or regulation administered by the Secretary regarding animal disease, or in violation of a law or regulation for which the Secretary has entered into a cooperative agreement.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0189)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       4,333,928
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,199,162
<ALLOWANCES>                                   199,106
<INVENTORY>                                  2,277,588
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,009,210
<PP&E>                                      35,005,609
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,240,101
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              44,180,706
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,963,537
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 11,901,260
<COMMON>                                        18,087
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,579,767
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                44,180,706
<SALES>                                     13,047,728
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,047,728
<CGS>                                       13,136,606
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,136,606
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                59,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             606,629
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,524,201)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,524,201)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,524,201)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.37)


</TABLE>
IV

House Calendar No. 261

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 557

[Report No. 106–760]

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1102) to provide for pension

reform, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JULY 18, 2000

Mr. REYNOLDS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1102) to provide

for pension reform, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution

2 it shall be in order without intervention of any point of

3 order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 1102) to

4 provide for pension reform, and for other purposes. The

5 bill shall be considered as read for amendment. In lieu

6 of the amendment recommended by the Committee on

7 Education and the Workforce now printed in the bill, an

8 amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of the
2

HRES 557 RH

1 text of the amendment recommended by the Committee

2 on Ways and Means now printed in H.R. 4843 shall be

3 considered as adopted. The previous question shall be con4 sidered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any

5 further amendment thereto to final passage without inter6 vening motion except: (1) one hour of debate on the bill,

7 as amended, equally divided and controlled by the chair8 man and ranking minority member of the Committee on

9 Ways and Means; (2) the amendment printed in the report

10 of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution,

11 if offered by Representative Rangel or his designee, which

12 shall be in order without intervention of any point of

13 order, shall be considered as read, and shall be separately

14 debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by

15 the proponent and an opponent; and (3) one motion to

16 recommit with or without instructions.

House Calendar No. 261

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 557

[Report No. 106–760]

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1102)

to provide for pension reform, and for other purposes.

JULY 18, 2000

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed
#### § 201.303 [Reserved]
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Seeks Comments on Farm Bill Changes to Help Expand Access to Capital 

for Rural Broadband Infrastructure Deployment

WASHINGTON, Sept. 10, 2021 – U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Deputy Under Secretary for Rural 

Development Justin Maxson today announced that USDA is seeking public comment on a direct final rule to 

help expand access to capital to deploy broadband infrastructure in rural areas. The changes apply to USDA’s 

Telecommunications Infrastructure Loans and Loan Guarantees program and are in accordance with the 

provisions of the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018 (the Farm Bill).

The Telecommunications Infrastructure Loans and Loan Guarantees program provides investment capital to

eligible entities to help deploy telecommunications infrastructure, including broadband facilities in rural areas.

Eligible entities are corporations, limited liability companies, cooperative or mutual organizations, Indian tribes 

or tribal organizations, and state and local governments.

USDA will make several improvements to streamline the application process. The department is seeking 

comments on the following reforms that will enable USDA to:

• Issue a notice to applicants who may be eligible to receive grant assistance through the Farm Bill 

Broadband Program, under 7 CFR 1738. 

• Remove the requirement for applicants to provide a Certificate of Convenience and Necessity, which

grants a company the authority to operate a public service.

• Expand refinancing limits to 100 percent for Rural Utilities Service (RUS) loans and expand limits to 50 

percent for non-RUS loans. Refinancing limits will be published in funding opportunity announcements 

and will be based on funding amounts that are authorized in a given fiscal year.

• Add public notice filing and response requirements. This change will enable service providers to 

respond to pending applications that propose to provide broadband service outside of their territory.

• Add reporting requirements to ensure similar data is reported and collected across multiple USDA 

broadband programs.

• Set standards to ensure that programs are able to meet funding deadlines while maintaining the integrity 

of the environmental review process.

• Define “Retail Broadband Service.”
Interested parties may submit comments, identified by docket number RUS-20-TELECOM-0044 and 

Regulatory Information Number 0572-AC48 via www.regulations.gov. Comments are due by Nov. 9, 2021. For 

additional information, see page 50604 of the Sept. 10 Federal Register.

If you’d like to subscribe to USDA Rural Development updates, visit our GovDelivery subscriber page. 

###

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 22, 2017

s0315

Order 

Clerk

March 22, 2017

154388

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 154388

COA: 332187

Wayne CC: 10-001008-FC

REYNAURD MARTELL GOBER, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 14, 2016 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Kern

Fresno

Tulare

Merced

Madera

Kings

Stanislaus

San

Joaquin

Pomegranate Submission

8 California Counties

Proposed Pomegranate Program

Program Counties

0 0.00035 0.0007 0.0014 Miles

The information displayed in this map is intended to serve as an aid in displaying data provided or stored by the Risk Management Agency. It does not modify, replace or supersede any USDA published policy provisions or procedures. 

Maps created by USDA Risk Management Agency are for spatial and visual context for depicting the basic information for "where". Maps are not considered a survey. General Reference Only.

Source: USDA RMA - System of Analytics

Data Current Date: January 25, 2022

Layer Credits: USDA Risk Management Agency

Map Projection: USA Contiguous Albers Equal Area Conic

Map Creation Date: January 25, 2022

RMA Product Management
Exhibit 4.CC




Exhibit 4.CC





  PROMISSORY NOTE

     

    of

     

    Battle Mountain Gold Inc. (“BMG”)

  FOR VALUE RECEIVED, BMG promises to pay to Ian D. Brown, of 3528 West 20th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V6S 1E7 (“Lender”) the amount of $10,000.00 (ten thousand dollars) plus interest at the rate of 6% (six per cent) per annum calculated from December 14, 2015 until the date or dates of repayment on a non-compounding basis not in advance, on the demand of the Lender provided cash funds of $400,000.00 or more have been received by BMG from the proceeds of one or more equity issuances by BMG prior to the time of the demand by the Lender.

  Executed this 14th day of December, 2015 on behalf of BMG by:

     

  Signed “Chet Idziszek”

  Chet Idziszek,

    Chief Executive Officer

    (having the authority to bind BMG)

  E-681
### §2690. Relationship to other Federal law

Nothing in this subchapter shall affect the authority of other appropriate Federal agencies to establish or enforce any requirements which are at least as stringent as those established pursuant to this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 94–469, title IV, §410, as added Pub. L. 102–550, title X, §1021(a), Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 3921.)
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Kevin Miles :

:

v. : No. 512 C.D. 2016

:

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, :

Department of Transportation, :

Bureau of Driver Licensing, :

Appellant :

O R D E R

NOW, February 17, 2017

, having considered appell ee ’s application for

reargument en banc and appell ant ’s answer in response ther eto , the application is

denied.

MARY HANNAH LEAVITT,

P resident Judge
### §27a. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Oct. 15, 1914, ch. 323, §27, as added Pub. L. 105–297, §3, Oct. 27, 1998, 112 Stat. 2824, which related to application of antitrust laws to professional major league baseball, was transferred to section 26b of this title.
# C_2011113EN.01001303.xml

| 9.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/13

---

Order of the General Court of 3 February 2011 — Abercrombie & Fitch Europe v OHIM — Gilli (GILLY HICKS)

(Case T-336/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)

2011/C 113/27

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Abercrombie & Fitch Europe SA (Mendrisio, Switzerland) (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister, and D. Stone and L. Ritchie, Solicitors)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Gilli Srl (Milan, Italy)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 May 2010 (Case R 832/2008-1) concerning opposition proceedings between Gilli Srl and Abercrombie & Fitch Europe SA

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | The defendant shall bear its own costs and pay the defendant’s. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The defendant shall bear its own costs and pay the defendant’s.

---

(1)  OJ C 274, 9.10.2010.

1

---
### §§280, 281. Repealed. Pub. L. 100–418, title V, §5113, Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1432

Section 280, acts July 16, 1914, ch. 141, §1, 38 Stat. 502; 1978 Reorg. Plan No. 2, §102, 43 F.R. 36037, 92 Stat. 3783, related to promotion of apprentices in National Bureau of Standards.

Section 281, acts Mar. 4, 1913, ch. 150, §1, 37 Stat. 945; 1967 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §401, eff. Aug. 11, 1967, 32 F.R. 11669, 81 Stat. 948; Dec. 24, 1973, Pub. L. 93–198, title IV, §421, title VII, §711, 87 Stat. 789, 818, related to testing of building and other structural materials for District of Columbia.
| **INVESTMENTS IN OPERATING PARTNERSHIPS (Details)** | Dec. 31, 2013Number | Dec. 31, 2012Number |
|-----------------------------------------------------|---------------------|---------------------|
| Number Of Operating Partnerships                    | 1                   | 6                   |
| Series One [Member]                                 |                |                |
| Number Of Operating Partnerships                    | 0                   | 0                   |
| Series Two [Member]                                 |                |                |
| Number Of Operating Partnerships                    | 0                   | 0                   |
| Series Three [Member]                               |                |                |
| Number Of Operating Partnerships                    | 1                   | 6                   |
| Series Four [Member]                                |                |                |
| Number Of Operating Partnerships                    | 0                   | 0                   |
| Series Five [Member]                                |                |                |
| Number Of Operating Partnerships                    | 0                   | 0                   |
| Series Six [Member]                                 |                |                |
| Number Of Operating Partnerships                    | 0                   | 0                   |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Number of operating partnerships.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**bctc_NumberOfOperatingPartnerships**Namespace Prefix:**bctc_**Data Type:**xbrli:integerItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**instant |
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1167

To amend the Pacific Northwest Electric Power Planning and Conservation

Act to provide for expanding the scope of the Independent Scientific

Review Panel.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 27, 1999

Mr. GORTON (for himself, Mr. SMITH of Oregon, and Mr. CRAIG) introduced

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee

on Energy and Natural Resources

A BILL

To amend the Pacific Northwest Electric Power Planning

and Conservation Act to provide for expanding the scope

of the Independent Scientific Review Panel.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REVIEW OF REIMBURSABLE PROJECTS, PRO4 GRAMS, AND MEASURES BY THE INDE5 PENDENT SCIENTIFIC REVIEW PANEL OF THE

6 PACIFIC NORTHWEST ELECTRIC POWER

7 PLANNING COUNCIL.

8 Section 4(h)(10)(D) of the Pacific Northwest Electric

9 Power Planning and Conservation Act (16 U.S.C.
2

S 1167 IS

1 839b(h)(10)(D)) is amended by striking clauses (vii) and

2 (viii) and inserting the following:

3 ‘‘(vii) REVIEW BY THE PANEL OF RE4 IMBURSABLE PROJECTS, PROGRAMS, AND

5 MEASURES.—

6 ‘‘(I) IN GENERAL.—With regard

7 to Columbia Basin fish and wildlife

8 projects, programs or measures pro9 posed in a Federal agency budget to

10 be reimbursed by BPA, or paid

11 through a direct funding agreement

12 with BPA, the panel shall annually—

13 ‘‘(aa) review such proposals;

14 ‘‘(bb) determine whether the

15 proposals are consistent with the

16 criteria stated in item (iv);

17 ‘‘(cc) make any rec18 ommendations that the Panel

19 considers appropriate to make

20 the project, program, or measure

21 meet the criteria stated in item

22 (iv); and

23 ‘‘(dd) transmit the rec24 ommendations to the Council no

25 later than April 1 of each year.
3

S 1167 IS

1 ‘‘(II) PUBLIC AVAILABILITY AND

2 COMMENT.—Determinations and rec3 ommendations made by the panel

4 under subclause (I) shall be available

5 to the public and shall be subject to

6 public comment as in item (v).

7 ‘‘(III) ROLE OF THE COUNCIL.—

8 The Council shall fully consider the

9 recommendations of the Panel when

10 making its final recommendations of

11 projects proposed by Federal agencies

12 and reimbursed by BPA, or paid

13 through a direct funding agreement

14 with BPA. The Council shall submit

15 its recommendations to the House and

16 Senate Committees on Appropriations

17 and relevant authorizing committees

18 no later than May 15 of each year. If

19 the Council does not incorporate a

20 recommendation of the Panel in its

21 recommendations, the Council shall

22 explain in writing its reasons for not

23 accepting Panel recommendations.
4

S 1167 IS

1 ‘‘(viii) COST LIMITATION.—The an2 nual cost of this provision shall not exceed

3 $750,000 in 1997 dollars.’’.

Æ
SK
Ready Kids

*) Homeland
” Security

Dad \ T'll read you ~
Sure! Let's gather all the items on the First, radio, flashlight

fener A Family Supply List and then review what she lst and two'sets of batteries for

softs Bramized.., | (. specal tems our family should includel/ aM 4 { Sachi What are you putting in

make our family's 5 your kit, Hector?

Than, « complete change of
Now we need a three day supply of And a first aid kit,
food and three gallons of water for atting for cock of val which T see Hector has
each family member. = ! already found

Can't forget the fun stuff! My favorite / ,
game, CD pleyer and CD's, batteries, books, iat snes plete ot conte Wont Tasting
‘ ; reed ig
ee an eee latest issue of Bird's Life magazine... my backpack!

ink we final ck!
What do you think, Ded owe have everything we Excellent Rory! It scll here! Flashlight. radio, food How did that
f ‘il i ‘and water, clothing, tools, first aid kit, pet it in there?
need in our family’s emergency supply bet feed yon Beas ger

copy of ‘Bird's Life'!

YZ ‘
Double check’ Vf
PA We rock! Ji
§ 590.580 Pathogen reduction standards testing. ( a ) Official plants must test to determine that the production of egg products is in compliance with the Act and the egg products inspection regulations.
( b ) To ensure adequate pasteurization: ( 1 ) Pasteurized liquid, frozen, and dried egg products, and heat treated dried egg whites must be sampled and analyzed for the presence of *Salmonella* spp. Such testing by the official plant must be performed in a manner sufficient such that it is possible for the official plant to verify that the system is capable of eliminating *Salmonella* spp. at the time that the annual reassessment occurs, and as regularly as necessary between annual reassessments, to show that the system, when tested, is working.
( 2 ) Samples must be analyzed for the presence of *Salmonella* spp. with such frequency and using such laboratory methods as is sufficient to ensure that product is not adulterated. For each category of product, sampling should be conducted on a rotating basis.
( 3 ) Samples must be drawn from the final packaged form.
( c ) Results of all partial and completed analyses performed under paragraph (b) of this section must be provided to inspection program personnel promptly upon receipt by the official plant. Positive test results must be provided to inspection program personnel immediately upon receipt by the official plant.
[85 FR 68680, Oct. 29, 2020]
Exhibit 13.2














PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with this Annual Report of Frontline Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Inger M. Klemp, the Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.





Date: April 26, 2012








/s/ Inger M. Kemp


Inger M. Kemp


Principal Financial Officer