12702 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 45 / Tuesday, March 8, 2011 / Notices 

customer. We will direct CBP to assess 

the resulting per-kilogram dollar 

amount against each kilogram of 

merchandise on each of that importer’s 

or customer’s entries during the period 

of review. See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 

The Department clarified its 

‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on 

May 6, 2003. This clarification will 

apply to entries of subject merchandise 

during the period of review produced by 

TPBI for which it did not know that the 

merchandise it sold to an intermediary 

(e.g., a reseller, trading company, or 

exporter) was destined for the United 

States. In such instances, we will 

instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed 

entries at the all-others rate if there is no 

rate for the intermediary(ies) involved 

in the transaction. See Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 

For the companies which were not 

selected for individual examination, we 

will instruct CBP to apply the rates 

listed above to all entries of subject 

merchandise produced and/or exported 

by such firms. 

We intend to issue liquidation 

instructions to CBP 15 days after 

publication of these final results of 

review. 

Cash-Deposit Requirements 

The following deposit requirements 

will be effective upon publication of 

this notice of final results of 

administrative review for all shipments 

of the subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the date of 

publication, consistent with section 

751(a)(1) of the Act: (1) The cashdeposit rates for the reviewed 

companies will be the rates shown 

above; (2) for previously investigated or 

reviewed companies not listed above, 

the cash-deposit rate will continue to be 

the company-specific rate published for 

the most recent period; (3) if the 

exporter is not a firm covered in this or 

a previous review or the original lessthan-fair-value (LTFV) investigation but 

the manufacturer is, the cash-deposit 

rate will be the rate established for the 

most recent period for the manufacturer 

of the merchandise; (4) the cash-deposit 

rate for all other manufacturers or 

exporters will be 4.69 percent, the allothers rate from the amended final 

determination of the LTFV investigation 

as revised as a result of the Section 129 

determination published on August 12, 

2010. See Notice of Implementation of 

Determination Under Section 129 of the 

Uruguay Round Agreements Act and 

Partial Revocation of the Antidumping 

Duty Order on Polyethylene Retail 

Carrier Bags From Thailand, 75 FR 

48940 (August 12, 2010). 

These deposit requirements shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification Requirements 

This notice serves as a reminder to 

importers of their responsibility under 

19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Department’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of doubled antidumping duties. See Id. 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

notification of the destruction of APO 

materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and the terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: March 1, 2011. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

Appendix 

1. Conversion-Cost Reallocation. 

2. Affiliated-Party Inputs. 

3. Blue Corner Rebates. 

4. Zeroing. 

5. Duties in Cost of Production and 

Constructed Value. 

6. General and Administrative Expenses. 

7. Ministerial Errors and Other Issues. 

[FR Doc. 2011–5267 Filed 3–7–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–533–818; C–560–806; C–475–827; C– 

580–837] 

Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality 

Steel Plate From India, Indonesia, Italy, 

and the Republic of Korea: Final 

Results of Expedited Sunset Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On November 1, 2010, the 

Department of Commerce (‘‘the 

Department’’) initiated the second 

sunset reviews of the countervailing 

duty (‘‘CVD’’) orders on certain cut-tolength carbon-quality steel plate from 

India, Indonesia, Italy, and the Republic 

of Korea (‘‘Korea’’) pursuant to section 

751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (‘‘the Act’’). On the basis of 

notices of intent to participate and 

adequate substantive responses filed on 

behalf of the domestic interested parties 

and inadequate response from 

respondent interested parties (in these 

cases, no response), the Department 

conducted expedited sunset reviews of 

these CVD orders pursuant to section 

751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.218(e)(1)(ii)(B). As a result of these 

sunset reviews, the Department finds 

that revocation of the CVD orders would 

be likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of a countervailable subsidy 

at the level indicated in the ‘‘Final 

Results of Reviews’’ section of this 

notice. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 8, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric 

Greynolds, AD/CVD Operations, Office 

3, Import Administration, International 

Trade Administration, U.S. Department 

of Commerce, 14th Street and 

Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–6071. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On November 1, 2010, the Department 

initiated a sunset review of the CVD 

orders on certain cut-to-length carbonquality steel plate from India, Indonesia, 

Italy, and Korea pursuant to section 

751(c) of the Act. See Initiation of FiveYear (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 75 FR 67082 

(November 1, 2010). The Department 

received a notice of intent to participate 

in each of these reviews from the 

following domestic interested parties: 

Nucor Corporation, ArcelorMittal USA, 

Evraz NA Claymont, Evraz NA Oregon 

Steel Mills, and SSAB N.A.D. 

(collectively, ‘‘domestic interested 

parties’’) within the deadline specified 

in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i). The 

domestic interested parties claimed 

interested party status under section 

771(9)(C) of the Act. 

The Department received adequate 

substantive responses collectively from 

the domestic interested parties within 

the 30-day deadline specified in 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(3)(i). However, the 

Department did not receive a 

substantive response from any 

government or respondent interested 

party to these proceedings. As a result, 

pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 45 / Tuesday, March 8, 2011 / Notices 12703 

the Department conducted expedited 

reviews of these CVD orders. 

Scope of the Orders 

The products covered by the 

countervailing duty orders are certain 

hot-rolled carbon-quality steel: (1) 

Universal mill plates (i.e., flat-rolled 

products rolled on four faces or in a 

closed box pass, of a width exceeding 

150 mm but not exceeding 1250 mm, 

and of a nominal or actual thickness of 

not less than 4 mm, which are cut-tolength (not in coils) and without 

patterns in relief), of iron or non-alloyquality steel; and (2) flat-rolled 

products, hot-rolled, of a nominal or 

actual thickness of 4.75 mm or more and 

of a width which exceeds 150 mm and 

measures at least twice the thickness, 

and which are cut-to-length (not in 

coils). 

Steel products to be included in the 

scope are of rectangular, square, circular 

or other shape and of rectangular or 

non-rectangular cross-section where 

such non-rectangular cross-section is 

achieved subsequent to the rolling 

process (i.e., products which have been 

‘‘worked after rolling’’)—for example, 

products which have been beveled or 

rounded at the edges. Steel products 

that meet the noted physical 

characteristics that are painted, 

varnished or coated with plastic or other 

non-metallic substances are included 

within the scope. Also, specifically 

included in the scope are high strength, 

low alloy (‘‘HSLA’’) steels. HSLA steels 

are recognized as steels with microalloying levels of elements such as 

chromium, copper, niobium, titanium, 

vanadium, and molybdenum. 

Steel products to be included in the 

scope, regardless of Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States 

(‘‘HTSUS’’) definitions, are products in 

which: (1) Iron predominates, by 

weight, over each of the other contained 

elements, (2) the carbon content is two 

percent or less, by weight, and (3) none 

of the elements listed below is equal to 

or exceeds the quantity, by weight, 

respectively indicated: 1.80 percent of 

manganese, or 1.50 percent of silicon, or 

1.00 percent of copper, or 0.50 percent 

of aluminum, or 1.25 percent of 

chromium, or 0.30 percent of cobalt, or 

0.40 percent of lead, or 1.25 percent of 

nickel, or 0.30 percent of tungsten, or 

0.10 percent of molybdenum, or 0.10 

percent of niobium, or 0.41 percent of 

titanium, or 0.15 percent of vanadium, 

or 0.15 percent zirconium. All products 

that meet the written physical 

description, and in which the chemistry 

quantities do not equal or exceed any 

one of the levels listed above, are within 

the scope unless otherwise specifically 

excluded. The following products are 

specifically excluded from the orders: 

(1) Products clad, plated, or coated with 

metal, whether or not painted, 

varnished or coated with plastic or other 

non-metallic substances; (2) SAE grades 

(formerly AISI grades) of series 2300 

and above; (3) products made to ASTM 

A710 and A736 or their proprietary 

equivalents; (4) abrasion-resistant steels 

(i.e., USS AR 400, USS AR 500); (5) 

products made to ASTM A202, A225, 

A514 grade S, A517 grade S, or their 

proprietary equivalents; (6) ball bearing 

steels; (7) tool steels; and (8) silicon 

manganese steel or silicon electric steel. 

The merchandise subject to the orders is 

currently classifiable in the HTSUS 

under subheadings: 7208.40.3030, 

7208.40.3060, 7208.51.0030, 

7208.51.0045, 7208.51.0060, 

7208.52.0000, 7208.53.0000, 

7208.90.0000, 7210.70.3000, 

7210.90.9000, 7211.13.0000, 

7211.14.0030, 7211.14.0045, 

7211.90.0000, 7212.40.1000, 

7212.40.5000, 7212.50.0000, 

7225.40.3050, 7225.40.7000, 

7225.50.6000, 7225.99.0090, 

7226.91.5000, 7226.91.7000, 

7226.91.8000, 7226.99.0000. 

Although the HTSUS subheadings are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, the written description of the 

merchandise subject to the orders is 

dispositive. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in these reviews are 

addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum (‘‘Decision 

Memorandum’’) from Gary Taverman, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations, to Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration, dated concurrent with 

and hereby adopted by this notice. 

Parties can find a complete discussion 

of all issues raised in this review and 

the corresponding recommendation in 

this public memorandum which is on 

file in the Central Records Unit, room 

7046 of the main Commerce building. In 

addition, a complete version of the 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly on the Web at http:// 

ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper copy and 

electronic version of the Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

Final Results of Reviews 

The Department determines that 

revocation of the CVD orders would be 

likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of a countervailable subsidy 

at the rates listed below: 

Producers/Exporters 

Net 

counter 

vailable 

subsidy 

(percent) 

India: 

Steel Authority of India 

(‘‘SAIL’’) ............................ 12.82 

All other producers/manufacturers/exporters ........... 12.82 

Indonesia: 

P.T. Krakatau Steel ............. 47.71 

All Others 1 .......................... 15.90 

Italy: 

ILVA S.p.A. .......................... 2.38 

All Others 2 .......................... 2.38 

Korea: 

Dongkuk Steel Mill, Ltd. ...... 1.38 

All others 3 ........................... 1.38 

1P.T. Gunawan Steel and P.T. Jaya Pari 

were excluded from the order on the basis of 

a de minimis net subsidy. See Notice of 

Amended Final Determinations: Certain CutTo-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate From 

India and the Republic of Korea; and Notice of 

Countervailing Duty Orders: Certain Cut-ToLength Carbon-Quality Steel Plate From 

France, India, Indonesia, Italy, and the Republic of Korea, 65 FR 6587 (February 10, 2000) 

(‘‘CVD Order’’). 2Palini & Bertol were excluded from the 

order on the basis of a de minimis net subsidy. See CVD Order. 3Pohang Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. was excluded from the order on the basis of a de 

minimis net subsidy. See CVD Order. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) 

of their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. 

Timely notification of return/ 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and the terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

We are issuing and publishing the 

results and notice in accordance with 

sections 751(c), 752, and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act. 

Dated: March 1, 2011. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2011–5220 Filed 3–7–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES