alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010234EN.01005101.xml

| 28.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/51

---

Action brought on 26 June 2010 — Martin v Commission

(Case T-291/10)

()

2010/C 234/90

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Anne Martin (Brussels, Belgium), (represented by: U. O’Dwyer, Solicitor)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the implied Decision of the Commission of 20 April 2010 to refuse confirmatory access to the applicant’s 4 March 2010 request for access to documents; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the implied Decision of the Commission of 20 April 2010 to refuse confirmatory access to the applicant’s 4 March 2010 request for access to documents;

| — | Order for the Commission to comply with Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents within the time-limits as deemed appropriate by the Court; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Order for the Commission to comply with Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents within the time-limits as deemed appropriate by the Court; and

1

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

By means of the present application, the applicant seeks, pursuant to Article 263 TFUE, the annulment of the implied Decision of the Commission of 20 April 2010, whereby the latter failed to respond to the applicant’s confirmatory access to documents application to the Secretariat General of the Commission under Article 7(2) of Regulation 1049/2001 re-stating her original access to documents request of 22 December 2009 by the deadline of 20 April 2010.

In support of his appeal, the applicant submits the following pleas in law:

The failure of the Commission to take a decision by the time limit of 20 April 2010 imposed on it by Regulation 1049/2001 constitutes an implied refusal of the confirmatory access to document request of 4 March 2010 of the Applicant and is in breach of Article 8(1) of the said regulation and Article 296 TFEU for failing to state adequate reasons for the refusal.

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43).

1

---
§ 325.7 Shipment of products requiring special supervision between official establishments under official seal; certificate. ( a ) Products passed for cooking, and beef that is to be refrigerated to destroy cysticerci, may be shipped loose from one official establishment to any other official establishment, for further handling in accordance with part 318 of this subchapter, in railroad cars, trucks, or other means of conveyance sealed with the official seal of the Department as prescribed in § 325.16: *Provided,* That in the case of railroad cars, the receiving establishment has railroad facilities for unloading the products directly into the establishment.
( b ) When such restricted product is shipped from one official establishment to another official establishment in the same railroad car or other means of conveyance with other product, such restricted product shall be packed in individual closed containers as hereinafter provided. Containers shall be sealed by firmly applying a pressure sensitive tape around each container in two directions and stamping the intersection of the tape with the marking device described in § 312.2(a) of this subchapter for use on burlap, muslin, etc. (21 ⁄ 2-inch rubber brand). Such tape must possess the adhesive property to actually remove a portion of the container surface when the tape is removed. Alternatively, an inelastic, nonmetallic strap which will retain a legible imprint of the marking device (21 ⁄ 2-inch rubber brand) may be used. The imprint of the marking device shall be placed partially on the strap and partially on the container. Such restricted product shall be marked “U.S. passed for cooking” or “pork product ____ °F. ____days refrigeration” or “beef passed for refrigeration,” as the case may be. In addition, a “U.S. retained” tag shall be securely affixed to each container of product passed for cooking and of beef passed for refrigeration. The means of conveyance shall not be sealed unless at least 25 percent of the other product in the vehicle is unmarked. For each consignment there shall be promptly issued and forwarded by the inspector to the inspector in charge at destination, a report on the form entitled “Notice of Unmarked Meats Shipped in Sealed Cars,” appropriately modified to show the character of the containers, and that the contents are restricted. A duplicate copy shall be retained in the program files.
( c ) When products are offered for transportation under this section, the initial carrier shall require and the shipper shall make in duplicate and deliver to the carrier one copy of a certificate in the form set out in § 325.5(b). Certificates in this form or copies thereof need not be forwarded to any official or office of the Department, but the original of the certificate shall be retained by the carrier and a copy shall be retained by the shipper in accordance with part 320 of this subchapter. If the shipper is also the carrier, he shall nevertheless execute and retain the certificate in accordance with part 320 of this subchapter.
[35 FR 15605, Oct. 3, 1970, as amended at 39 FR 20187, June 7, 1974; 83 FR 25307, May 31, 2018]
#### § 25.2 Inspection.

Packages, briefcases, and other containers as well as vehicles and their contents are subject to inspection while in or when being brought into, or when being removed from the GAO Building. A full search of a person may accompany an arrest or apprehension.
### §1026. Repealed. Pub. L. 94–136, title VI, §601, Nov. 28, 1975, 89 Stat. 742

Section, Pub. L. 92–210, §4, Dec. 22, 1971, 85 Stat. 753; Pub. L. 93–34, May 14, 1973, 87 Stat. 72, created the President's National Commission on Productivity and authorized appropriations for its operation through June 30, 1973. Thereafter, the Commission's name was changed to the National Commission on Productivity and Work Quality by Pub. L. 93–311, June 8, 1974, 88 Stat. 236 and appropriations were authorized to continue operations through November 30, 1975, by Pub. L. 94–42, §2, June 28, 1975, 89 Stat. 232, and Pub. L. 94–100, §2, Oct. 1, 1975, 89 Stat. 483. See section 2401 et seq. of this title.
###### Editorial Note on Part 28

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear at 76 FR 76873, Dec. 9, 2011.

#### § 28.13 Special procedure for Reduction in Force.

In the event of a Reduction in Force (RIF) resulting in an individual's separation from employment, an aggrieved employee may choose to file a petition directly with the Personnel Appeals Board, without first filing the charge with the PAB's Office of General Counsel pursuant to § 28.11. Pursuant to § 28.98, individuals raising discrimination issues in connection with a RIF action need not file a complaint with GAO's Office of Opportunity and Inclusiveness before pursuing a RIF challenge alleging discrimination, either by filing directly with the PAB or by filing a charge with the Board's Office of General Counsel.

[68 FR 69299, Dec. 12, 2003]
Order entered February 20, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00170-CV

BAXTER BAILEY & ASSOCIATES, INC., Appellant

V.

TTS, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 401-04029-2012

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s February 11, 2014 motion for an extension of time to file a 

notice of appeal. The notice of appeal filed on February 11, 2014 is deemed timely for 

jurisdictional purposes.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
# C_2013156EN.01004202.xml

| 1.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/42

---

Order of the General Court of 9 April 2013 — Zuckerfabrik Jülich v Commission

(Case T-66/10) (1)

1

(Agriculture - Sugar - Production levies - Partial annulment and declaration of nullity of Regulation (EC) No 1193/2009 after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 156/78

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Zuckerfabrik Jülich GmbH (formerly Zuckerfabrik Jülich AG) (Jülich, Germany) (represented by: H.-J. Prieß and B. Sachs, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Rossi and B. Schima, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented initially by: F. Diez Moreno and subsequently by: A. Rubio Gonzâlez, abogados del Estado), and Republic of Lithuania (represented initially by: R. Janeckaitè and R. Krasuckaitè, and subseqeuntly by: R. Krasuckaitè and R. Makevičienè, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the applicant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1193/2009 of 3 November 2009 correcting Regulations (EC) No 1762/2003, (EC) No 1775/2004, (EC) No 1686/2005, (EC) No 164/2007 and fixing the production levies in the sugar sector for marketing years 2002/2003, 2003/2004, 2004/2005, 2005/2006 (OJ 2009 L 321, p. 1)

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate in the present action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate in the present action.

| 2. | The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those of Zuckerfabrik Jülich GmbH. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those of Zuckerfabrik Jülich GmbH.

| 3. | The Kingdom of Spain and the Republic of Lithuania shall bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Kingdom of Spain and the Republic of Lithuania shall bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 113, 1.5.2010.

1

---
#### Herman Seider v. Isaac Huppert and Others.

Motion granted, with ten dollars costs.
FORM RD 2006-46 (Rev. 01-98)

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE MANUAL ISSUE No.

RURAL DEVELOPMENT WSAL PN 597

Washington, D.C 20250 DATE

November 21, 2023

PROCEDURE NOTICE

RD MANUAL CHANGES

INSERT RD INS 440.1 INTEREST RATES, AMORTIZATION, 

(WSAL) GUARANTEE FEE, ANNUAL CHARGE, AND 

FIXED PERIOD. This Instruction is 

partially revised as follows:

Exhibit B is partially revised to update the Treasury Judgement rate and the 

effective date of December 1, 2023.

INSERT

Exhibit B revised 11-21-23. 

INSERT RD INS 2006-NN RURAL DEVELOPMENT PHYSICAL SECURITY 

(WSAL) TRAINING. This Instruction is completely, 

this update changes the required frequency 

of Active Shooter Response training from every two years to annually, consistent 

with changes to the Interagency Security Committee (ISC) Standard. It also adds 

an annual requirement for Situational Awareness training consistent with the 

requirements of the ISC Risk Management Process.

RD HANDBOOK CHANGES

INSERT RD HB-1-3550 DIRECT SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING LOANS AND

(WSAL) GRANTS FIELD OFFICE HANDBOOK. Chapter 7

is partially revised to update the Tax 

Service fee with the new 5yr contract figures along with minor grammatical

corrections. 

INSERT

Chapter 7 dated 01-23-03:

 Pages 7-1 & 7-2 and 7-5 & 7-6,

 Attachment 7-A revised, and

 Attachment 7-B revised 11-21-23.

(CON.)

READ PROCEDURE - DISCUSS IN STAFF CONFERENCE - KEEP PROCEDURE MANUAL UP TO DATE

 
Page 2 ISSUED: PN 597

November 21, 2023

FORMS 

 NEW

RD 402-1A DEPOSIT ACCOUNT CONTROL AGREEMENT dated 

(WSAL) 11-23). This Form will be used by staff to

establish supervised bank accounts in

connection with MFH loans and grants. MFH borrowers have the option of 

executing the Form RD 402-1 or the Form RD 402-1A. Executing Form RD 402-1A 

eliminates the countersignature requirement for approved reserve account 

withdrawals and allows for electronic banking transactions. The Form and FMI 

can be located on the eForms website eForms Home (usda.gov).

INSERT

FMI dated 11-21-23.

 REPLACEMENT 

RD 1955-62 PROGRAM LOAN COST EXPENSE CONTRACTUAL OR

(WSAL) NON-CONTRACTUAL REQUEST revised 11-23. 

Prescribed in RD Instruction 2024-A. The 

Form and FMI are revised The FMI for Form 1955-62 formatting has been updated 

to include screenshots of the revised 1955-62, addition of additional roles to 

certain parts such as supervisor, 2nd party reviewer, and COR, nominal 

formatting changes, and removal of item 4 relating to regional attorneys. The 

Form and FMI can be located on the eForms website eForms Home (usda.gov).

REMOVE INSERT

FMI dated 08-16-22. FMI revised 11-21-23.

oOo
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                   SUBSIDIARIES OF PRATT CASINO CORPORATION

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                                                                          STATE
     NAME                                         ADDRESS                                ORGANIZED
<S>                                     <C>                                              <C>    
GB Holdings, Inc.                       136 South Kentucky Avenue                         Delaware
                                        Atlantic City, New Jersey  08401
 
Greate Bay Hotel and Casino, Inc.       136 South Kentucky Avenue                         New Jersey
                                        Atlantic City, New Jersey  08401
 
GB Property Funding Corp.               136 South Kentucky Avenue                         New Jersey
                                        Atlantic City, New Jersey  08401
 
PRT Funding Corp.                       200 Decadon Drive, Suite 100                      Delaware
                                        Egg Harbor Township, New Jersey 08234
 
New Jersey Management, Inc.             200 Decadon Drive, Suite 100                      New Jersey
                                        Egg Harbor Township, New Jersey 08234
</TABLE>
#### § 550.5 Registration.

The registration requirements in 9 CFR 320.5 apply to persons engaging in businesses, in or for commerce, relating to fish and fish products as they do to persons engaging in businesses relating to the carcasses, parts, and products, or any livestock, of other animal species that are amenable to the FMIA.
# C_2010234EN.01002002.xml

| 28.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/20

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landesarbeitsgericht Hamm (Germany) lodged on 4 May 2010 — KHS AG v Winfried Schulte

(Case C-214/10)

()

2010/C 234/31

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Landesarbeitsgericht Hamm

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: KHS AG

Applicant:

Defendant: Winfried Schulte

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Is Article 7(1) of Directive 2003/88/EC (1) to be interpreted as precluding national legislation and/or practices under which entitlement to minimum paid annual leave expires at the end of the reference period and/or carry-over period even in the case where the worker has been unfit for work over a prolonged period (and that prolonged period of unfitness for work has the result that that worker could have accumulated entitlement to minimum leave for several years if the possibility of carrying over such entitlement had not been limited in time)? If that question is answered in the negative, must the possibility of carrying over leave entitlement exist for a period of at least 18 months?

1

---

(1)  Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time (OJ 2003 L 299, p. 9).

1

---
#### Louis Berger, Appellant, v. Max Cohen, Respondent.

In the absence of express stipulation on the subject, the parties must be deemed to have intended that the delivery of the plans by the plaintiff and the payment therefor by the defendant should be concurrent acts. The plaintiff proved the preparation of the plans and a tender thereof to the defendant upon payment of the plaintiff’s services therefor. The defense of non-performance was, therefore; not available. *(Scott*v. Miller, 114 App. Div. 6.) Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event. Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.
# C_2011030EN.01005704.xml

| 29.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/57

---

Order of the General Court of 29 November 2010 — BASF v Commission

(Case T-105/10) (1)

1

()

2011/C 30/104

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 113, 1.5.2010.

1

---
# C_2010317EN.01003701.xml

| 20.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 317/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 317/37

---

Action brought on 21 September 2010 — Häfele v OHIM (Mixfront)

(Case T-425/10)

()

2010/C 317/67

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Häfele GmbH & Co. KG (Nagold, Germany) (represented by M. Eck and J. Dönch, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 30 June 2010 in Case R 338/2010-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 30 June 2010 in Case R 338/2010-1;

| — | order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘Mixfront’ for goods in Classes 6 and 20.

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Application refused.

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b), (c) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, (1) as the Community trade mark concerned is distinctive, is not descriptive and is not a name that has become customary.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

1

---
### §2107. Selection boards; composition of boards

A board convened under section 2106 of this title shall consist of five or more officers on the active duty promotion list who are serving in or above the grade to which the board may recommend officers for promotion. No officer may be a member of two successive boards convened to consider officers of the same grade for promotion.

(Added Pub. L. 88–130, §1(10)(C), Sept. 24, 1963, 77 Stat. 179, §252; renumbered §2107 and amended Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §§112(b), 123(b)(2), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4216, 4240.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282, §123(b)(2), substituted "section 2106" for "section 251".

Pub. L. 115–282, §112(b), renumbered section 252 of this title as this section.
#### § 381.408 Labeling of poultry products with number of servings.

The label of any package of a poultry product that bears a representation as to the number of servings contained in such package shall meet the requirements of § 381.121(c)(7).
### **CHAPTER 7—OFFENSES AND PENALTIES**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES

Sec.
211.
Receiving or securing compensation for appointment of employees.
212.
Refusal or neglect of employees to perform duties.
213.
False statements, certificates, and information.
214.
Wrongful disclosure of information.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—OTHER PERSONS

221.
Refusal or neglect to answer questions; false answers.
222.
Giving suggestions or information with intent to cause inaccurate enumeration of population.
223.
Refusal, by owners, proprietors, etc., to assist census employees.
224.
Failure to answer questions affecting companies, businesses, religious bodies, and other organizations; false answers.
225.
Applicability of penal provisions in certain cases.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—PROCEDURE

241.
Evidence.
# READ ME

# FCR

# INPUT

# PLAN 1

# PLAN 2

# COMPARE

# COMPARE
### §145. Certificate of incorporation

The Secretary shall, upon the filing of such application, issue a certificate of incorporation certifying that the provisions of this chapter have been complied with and declaring that the incorporators are a body corporate, if (a) an incorporation fee of $100 has been paid him; (b) he finds that the articles of incorporation and statements therein conform to the requirements of, and that the incorporation is authorized by, this chapter; and (c) he finds that such corporation will aid in developing markets in China for goods produced in the United States. A copy of the articles of incorporation shall be made a part of the certificate of incorporation and printed in full thereon. Any failure, previous to the issuance of the certificate of incorporation, by the incorporators or in respect to the application for the certificate of incorporation, to conform to any requirement of law which is a condition precedent to such issuance, may not subsequent thereto be held to invalidate the certificate of incorporation or alter the legal status of any act of a China Trade Act corporation, except in proceedings instituted by the registrar for the revocation of the certificate of incorporation.

(Sept. 19, 1922, ch. 346, §5, 42 Stat. 850.)