alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1b.8 Requests for Commission investigations. ( a ) Any individual, partnership, corporation, association, organization, or other Federal or State governmental entity, may request the Commission to institute an investigation.
( b ) Requests for investigations should set forth the alleged violation of law with supporting documentation and information as completely as possible. No particular forms or formal procedures are requested.
( c ) It is the Commission's policy not to disclose the name of the person or entity requesting an investigation except as required by law, or where such disclosure will aid the investigation.
```
**CORRESPONDENCE**
                      Certification Pursuant to 906 by CFO

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Surgical Safety Products, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Timothy
Novak, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully compiles with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                                  /s/ Timothy Novak
                                                      Timothy Novak

                                                      Chief Executive Officer
                                                      Surgical Safety Products, Inc.
August 12, 2003
```
### §2695. Grants for healthy school environments

#### (a) In general

The Administrator, in consultation with the Secretary of Education, may provide grants to States for use in—

(1) providing technical assistance for programs of the Environmental Protection Agency (including the Tools for Schools Program and the Healthy School Environmental Assessment Tool) to schools for use in addressing environmental issues; and

(2) development and implementation of State school environmental health programs that include—

(A) standards for school building design, construction, and renovation; and

(B) identification of ongoing school building environmental problems, including contaminants, hazardous substances, and pollutant emissions, in the State and recommended solutions to address those problems, including assessment of information on the exposure of children to environmental hazards in school facilities.

#### (b) Sunset

The authority of the Administrator to carry out this section shall expire 5 years after December 19, 2007.

(Pub. L. 94–469, title V, §501, as added Pub. L. 110–140, title IV, §461(a), Dec. 19, 2007, 121 Stat. 1640.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Subchapter effective on the date that is 1 day after Dec. 19, 2007, see section 1601 of Pub. L. 110–140, set out as a note under section 1824 of Title 2, The Congress.
§ 96.13 Uncertified casings; disinfection with hydrochloric acid. Foreign animal casings offered for importation into the United States without certification may be disinfected, as prescribed in this section, under the supervision of an APHIS inspector for use as food containers, as an alternative for foreign certification. ( a ) Disinfect the casings in a solution made as follows: Dissolve 90 pounds common salt in 100 gallons water and mix. Add 23 ⁄ 4 gallons (10.35 liters) C. P. hydrochloric acid containing not less than 35 percent actual HCl and mix thoroughly. The finished solution must contain not less than 1 percent actual hydrochloric acid.
( b ) Containers of the disinfectant solution may be either of wood or of metal, but the interior surfaces must be protected by means of an acid resistant coating.
( c ) Not more than 175 pounds casings shall be treated with each 100 gallons of the solution. After the treatment of 175 pounds of casings, or at the end of the day if less than 175 pounds of casings are disinfected in any one day, the solution shall be discarded unless means are provided for accurately determining the loss of strength. In event means for accurately determining loss of strength are provided it will be permissible to restore the strength of the solution with fresh acid and use it repeatedly.
( d ) Shake as much of the adherent salt as possible from the casings and weigh them. Bundles must be separated but individual hanks need not be untied. Place the casings in the disinfecting solution a few hanks at a time with vigorous agitation to insure the fullest possible contact of the solution with them. Then keep the casings completely submerged in the solution for not less than three-fourths of an hour.
( e ) Remove the casings from the solution, rinse them with water, and place them in a solution containing 81 ⁄ 2 pounds of sodium bicarbonate in each 100 gallons of water. 100 gallons of this solution is sufficient for 175 pounds of casings. Keep the casings in this solution for 30 minutes, moving them about frequently and vigorously so as to insure complete contact of the solution with the casings. After this neutralization, remove the casings from the sodium bicarbonate solution and wash them to remove the excess of bicarbonate.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0015) [28 FR 5986, June 13, 1963, as amended at 57 FR 29785, July 7, 1992. Redesignated at 58 FR 47031, Sept. 7, 1993, as amended at 59 FR 67134, Dec. 29, 1994]
#### § 1317.410 Comparable facilities.

A recipient may provide separate toilet, locker room, and shower facilities on the basis of sex, but such facilities provided for students of one sex shall be comparable to such facilities provided for students of the other sex.
-  Home 
-  Hazmat 

# In This Section

                      -  Hazardous Materials Standards & Rulemaking Overview 
                      -  International Program Overview 
                      -  PHMSA's Online CFR (oCFR) 
                      -  Rulemakings                          -  Overview 
                        -  Recently Published Rulemakings 
                        -  Archived Hazardous Materials Rulemakings (pre-1995) 
                      -  Petitions for Rulemaking 
                      -  Interpretations 
                      -  Regulations 
                      -  Preemption Determinations                          -  Overview 
                        -  Inconsistency Rulings 
                      -  Notices and Advisory Bulletins 
                      -  Lithium Battery Air Safety Advisory Committee 
                      -  Hazardous Materials Information Center 

# Lithium Battery Packaging Evaluation - FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018

Lithium Battery Packaging Evaluation- Final Report.pdf (1.94 MB)

Lithium Battery Packaging Evaluation - FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018

*DOT is committed to ensuring that information is available in appropriate alternative formats to meet the requirements of persons who have a disability. If you require an alternative version of files provided on this page, please contact          PHMSA-Accessibility@dot.gov.*
#### § 1308.54 Requests to quash or modify.

The person served with a subpoena (or a party, if the person served is a party's employee) may request the Hearing Officer to quash or modify a subpoena. Such requests shall be made and determined in accordance with the time limits and principles of Rule 45(a), (b) and (d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
#### § 354.232 Restrictions on use.

Equipment and utensils used in the official plant shall not be used outside the official plant except under such conditions as may be prescribed or approved by the national supervisor, and equipment used in the preparation of any article (including, but not being limited to, animal food) from inedible material shall not be used outside of the inedible products department except under such conditions as may be prescribed or approved by the national supervisor.
#### § 592.300 Approval of official identification.

Labeling procedures, required information on labels, and method of label approval, shall be in accordance with and conform to the applicable provisions of part 590 of this chapter.
§ 362.1 Definitions. The definitions in § 381.1 are incorporated in this part except for the definitions excluded in § 362.2(a). In addition to those definitions, the following definitions will be applicable to the regulations in this part. ( a ) *Act.* “Act” means the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946, as amended (60 Stat. 1087, as amended; 7 U.S.C. 1621 *et seq.*).
( b ) *Inspector.* “Inspector” means any officer or employee of the Department authorized to perform any duties under the regulations in this part.
( c ) *Person.* “Person” means any individual, corporation, company, association, firm, partnership, society, or joint stock company, or other organized business unit.
( d ) *Poultry.* “Poultry” means any migratory water fowl or game bird, whether dead or alive.
( e ) *Poultry Product.* “Poultry product” means any poultry carcass or part thereof; or any human food product which is made wholly or in part from the carcass of any domesticated bird (as defined in § 381.1(b) of this chapter) and is excepted from the inspection requirements of the Poultry Products Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 451 *et seq.*).
[66 FR 22905, May 7, 2001]
#### § 154.602 Cancellation or termination of a tariff, executed service agreement or part thereof.

When an effective tariff, contract, or part thereof on file with the Commission, is proposed to be canceled or is to terminate by its own terms and no new tariff, executed service agreement, or part thereof, is to be filed in its place, the natural gas company must notify the Commission of the proposed cancellation or termination , at least 30 days prior to the proposed effective date of such cancellation or termination. With such notice, the company must submit a statement showing the reasons for the cancellation or termination, a list of the affected customers and the contract demand provided to the customers under the service to be canceled. A copy of the notice must be duly posted tariff filing in the electronic format required by § 154.4.

[Order 582, 60 FR 52996, Oct. 11, 1995, as amended by Order 714, 73 FR 57535, Oct. 3, 2008]
Filed by Bowne Pure Compliance





Exhibit 4.11.1




JOINDER AGREEMENT 




This Joinder Agreement (“Joinder Agreement”) is executed by Kim C Tucker Living Trust
(“Joinder Party”) as of this 18th day of September 2007.



Background




Pure Earth, Inc. (“PEI) and Dynamic Decisions Strategic Opportunities, a Cayman Islands
corporation (“Seller”) are parties to a certain Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of August 17,
2007 (the “Stock Purchase Agreement”). Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined,
shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Stock Purchase Agreement. The Stock Purchase
Agreement contemplates that by execution of a Joinder Agreement, Joinder Party may become a party
to the Stock Purchase Agreement as a “Buyer ” thereunder to the extent of such Buyer’s Committed
Amount.



NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the undersigned, WITH THE INTENT TO BE
LEGALLY BOUND HEREBY, agrees as follows:



1. The undersigned Joinder Party hereby agrees to become a party to the Stock Purchase
Agreement, and agrees to be bound by and comply with all of the terms and conditions of, and be
entitled to all of the rights and benefits arising from, the Stock Purchase Agreement relating to
“Buyers” (as such term is defined in the Stock Purchase Agreement).



2. The undersigned Joinder Party hereby acknowledges receipt of a copy of the Stock Purchase
Agreement, and that Joinder Party has read and understands the Stock Purchase Agreement.



3. The undersigned Joinder Party hereby acknowledges and agrees that an executed copy of this
Joinder Agreement shall be attached to the Stock Purchase Agreement to evidence the undersigned’s
undertakings hereunder, and that an executed copy of this Joinder Agreement shall be given to each
person who is a party to the Stock Purchase Agreement as well as to the Escrow Agent.



4. The undersigned Joinder Party hereby agrees that its Committed Amount is 81,549.88,
(34,925) shares of the PEI Stock.



5. The name, address, telephone number and contact person of Joinder Party’s broker that will
coordinate the Delivery versus Payment transaction for Joinder Party’s Committed Amount is as
follows:



Retirement Plus Inc.

11350 Tomahawk Creek Parkway Suite 125

Legwood KS 66211

Attn:          Randy Halier          

Tel: 413-402-03131 ext. 110

Fax: 413-402-1032




6. This Joinder Agreement shall be governed by, construed and enforced in accordance with the
laws of the State of Delaware, without giving effect to principles of conflicts of laws.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned Joinder Party has executed this Joinder Agreement as of
the date first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	JOINDER PARTY	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:
	Kim C. Tucker Living Trust	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	PURE EARTH, INC.
	By:

	 	Kim C Tucker	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Addrress

	 	2405 W 114th Street
	 	 	 	By:
	 	/s/Mark Alsentzer
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Mark Alsentzer, Chief Executive Officer
	 

	 	Legwood, KS 66211
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLANTS ’ OPENING

BRIEF

-- pg. 1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Cause No. DA 20

- 0117

)

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & )

INDUSTRY, ex rel .: David A. )

Stevenson, )

) O RDER GRANTING

Petitioner/Appellee, ) EXTENSION OF TIME TO

) FILE AP PELLANTS ’

vs. ) OPENING BRIEF

)

LEPROWSE CONSTRUCTI ON, INC., )

and LEPROWSE CONTRACTING, INC., )

Montana Corporations action as joint )

employers, )

)

Respondents/Appellants, )

)

PURSUANT to the Amended Appellants ’ Second Uno pposed M otion f or Extension of

Time to File Appellants ’ Opening Brief , and for good cause appearing

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellants shall have to and including Ju ne 23, 2020, to

file and serve their Opening Brief.

DATED :

.

B y

Electronically signed by:

Laurie McKinnon

Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 4 2020

06/04/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0117
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1229 

KA 12-02178 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND VALENTINO, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

TRAVIS MARTIN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

 

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (KRISTIN M. PREVE OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (DAVID A. HERATY OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Deborah

A. Haendiges, J.), rendered October 18, 2012. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon a nonjury verdict, of criminal trespass in the second

degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon a

nonjury verdict of criminal trespass in the second degree (Penal Law §

140.15 [1]), defendant contends that the conviction is not supported

by legally sufficient evidence and that the verdict is against the

weight of the evidence based on his assertion that he had permission

to enter the victim’s apartment. We reject those contentions. 

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see

People v Williams, 84 NY2d 925, 926), we conclude that it is legally

sufficient to support the conviction (see generally People v Bleakley,

69 NY2d 490, 495). The victim and her daughter both testified that

defendant and the victim had broken up several weeks prior to the

incident and that defendant did not have permission to enter the

apartment on the date at issue. Further, viewing the evidence in

light of the elements of the crime in this nonjury trial (see People v

Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 349), we conclude that the verdict is not

against the weight of the evidence (see generally Bleakley, 69 NY2d at

495). Although a different verdict would not have been unreasonable

(see Danielson, 9 NY3d at 348), we conclude that, “[b]ased on the

weight of the credible evidence, [Supreme C]ourt . . . was justified

in finding the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt” (id.; see

People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633, 642-643). “ ‘Great deference is to be

accorded to the [factfinder]’s resolution of credibility issues based

upon its superior vantage point and its opportunity to view witnesses,

observe demeanor and hear the testimony’ ” (People v Gritzke, 292 AD2d
-2- 1229 

KA 12-02178 

805, 805-806, lv denied 98 NY2d 697), and we perceive no reason to

disturb the court’s credibility determinations.

Entered: November 21, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
C 

2016 Reinsurance Data 

National Totals By Fund 

As of 10/2020 

Fund Gross Liability Gross Premium Gross Indemnity Retained Liability * 

A 12,969,282,132 1,537,175,023 1,301,727,809 2,425,255,755 

87,468,837,138 7,792,650,677 2,613,999,571 81,605,547,450 

Total 100,438,119,270 9,329,825,700 3,915,727,380 84,030,803,204 

Footnotes: * Includes 6.5% Net Book Quota Share. 

Retained Premium * Retaine

287,451,721 

7,258,379,774 7,545,831,495 

Page 1 of 1
#### § 157.12 Dismissal of application.

Except for good cause shown, failure of an applicant to go forward on the date set for hearing and present its full case in support of its application will constitute ground for the summary dismissal of the application and the termination of the proceedings.

[17 FR 7386, Aug. 14, 1952]
### §1511c. Estuarine Programs Office

#### (a) Establishment

The Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (hereinafter in this section referred to as the "Administrator") shall establish within the Administration an Estuarine Programs Office.

#### (b) Functions

The Estuarine Programs Office shall—

(1) develop and implement a national estuarine strategy for the Administration that integrates the research, regulatory, and trusteeship responsibilities of the Administration;

(2) coordinate the estuarine activities of the various organizations within the Administration, including activities in estuarine research and assessment, fisheries research, coastal management, and habitat conservation;

(3) coordinate the estuarine activities of the Administration with the activities of other Federal and State agencies; and

(4) provide technical assistance to the Administrator, to other Federal agencies, and to State and local government agencies in—

(A) assessing the condition of estuaries;

(B) identifying estuaries of critical national or regional importance;

(C) identifying technical and management alternatives for the restoration and protection of estuarine resources; and

(D) monitoring the implementation and effectiveness of estuarine management plans.

#### (c) Authorization

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Administration not to exceed $500,000 for fiscal year 1987, $530,000 for fiscal year 1988, $560,000 for fiscal year 1989, and $600,000 for fiscal year 1990 to carry out the provisions of this section.

(Pub. L. 99–659, title IV, §406, Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3738.)
#### § 96.7 Dried bladders, weasands, and casings.

Dried animal bladders, dried weasands, and all other dried animal casings offered for importation into the United States as food containers unaccompanied by foreign certification which have been retained in the dry state continuously for not less than 90 days from the date of shipment shown on the consular invoice, may be released for entry as food containers without disinfection.

[28 FR 5986, June 13, 1963. Redesignated at 58 FR 47031, Sept. 7, 1993]
§ 1315.100 Conditions on use of funds. ( a ) No appropriated funds may be expended by the recipient of a Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative ageement to pay any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with any of the following covered Federal actions: the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
( b ) Each person who requests or receives from an agency a Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement shall file with that agency a certification, set forth in appendix A, that the person has not made, and will not make, any payment prohibited by paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) Each person who requests or receives from an agency a Federal contract, grant, loan, or a cooperative agreement shall file with that agency a disclosure form, set forth in appendix B, if such person has made or has agreed to make any payment using nonappropriated funds (to include profits from any covered Federal action), which would be prohibited under paragraph (a) of this section if paid for with appropriated funds.
( d ) Each person who requests or receives from an agency a commitment providing for the United States to insure or guarantee a loan shall file with that agency a statement, set forth in appendix A, whether that person has made or has agreed to make any payment to influence or attempt to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with that loan insurance or guarantee.
( e ) Each person who requests or receives from an agency a commitment providing for the United States to insure or guarantee a loan shall file with that agency a disclosure form, set forth in appendix B, if that person has made or has agreed to make any payment to influence or attempt to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with that loan insurance or guarantee.
DISMISSED; Opinion Filed April 2, 2013. 

# S

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05

- 13

- 00372

- CV
IN RE ANDREW DAVID M ALONE, JR. , Relator On Appeal from the 195th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F86

- 95910

- QN
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices O'Neill, Lang

- Miers, and Evans Opinion by Justice Evans Before the Court is relator’s petition for writ of mandamus naming Gary Fitzsimmons, the Dallas County District Clerk, as respondent. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. This Court does not have mandamus jurisdiction
over the district clerk. See T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN

. § 22.221 (Vernon 2 004). Accordingly, we
DISMISS relator’s petition for a writ of mandamus for want of jurisdiction.

130372F.P05 /David W. Evans/ DAVID W. EVANS JUSTICE