alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011055EN.01003101.xml

| 19.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/31

---

Action brought on 27 December 2010 — Deutsche Telekom v OHIM — TeliaSonera Denmark (Shade of magenta)

(Case T-583/10)

2011/C 55/56

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Deutsche Telekom AG (Bonn, Germany) (represented by: T. Dolde, V. von Bomhard and B. Goebel, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: TeliaSonera Denmark A/S (Copenhagen, Denmark)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 22 October 2010 in case R 463/2009-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 22 October 2010 in case R 463/2009-4;

| — | Order the defendant or the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal, should it become an intervening party in this case, to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant or the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal, should it become an intervening party in this case, to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: The colour mark consisting in a shade of magenta for services in classes 38 and 42 — Community trade mark registration No 212787

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The applicant

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark:

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: The party requesting the declaration of invalidity grounded its request on absolute grounds for refusal pursuant to Articles 4 and 7(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Closed the case following the withdrawal of the request for declaration of invalidity

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal as inadmissible

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 59 of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal: (i) failed to properly assess the admissibility of the appeal, and (ii) violated Articles 85(3) and 83 of Council Regulation No 207/2009, by denying the legitimate interest to continue the proceedings.

Pleas in law:

---
### §320. Repealed. Oct. 31, 1951, ch. 654, §1(34), 65 Stat. 702

Section, act Mar. 4, 1907, ch. 2907, 34 Stat. 1258, related to sale of maps or publications.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2012 of US-TH Energy Science and Technology Intl, Inc. (the Company) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in such report.   Very truly yours,  /s/ Jianping KangJianping KangChief Executive Officer/s/ Chunwei ZhouChunwei ZhouChief Financial OfficerDated: February 5, 2014     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to US-TH Energy Science and Technology Intl, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
###### Editorial Note on Part 12

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 12 appear at 69 FR 32438, June 10, 2004.

#### § 12.32 General inspection requirement.

The project works of each development to which this subpart applies, excluding transmission and transformation facilities, must be inspected on a periodic basis by an independent consultant team to identify any actual or potential deficiencies that might endanger life, health, or property, including deficiencies that may be in the condition of those project works or in the quality or adequacy of project maintenance, safety, methods of operation, analyses, and other conditions. A report must be prepared by the independent consultant team, by or under the direction of at least one independent consultant, who may be a member of a consulting firm, to document the findings and evaluations made during their inspection. The inspection must be performed by the independent consultant team, and the report must be filed by the licensee, in accordance with the procedures in this subpart D. The licensee must ensure that the independent consultant team's report meets all of the requirements set forth in this subpart D.
### SUBCHAPTER II—FOREIGN SECURITIES
EXHIBIT 32

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

The undersigned officers of Motient Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), do hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their
knowledge:

         (i)      the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year
                  ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
                  Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the
                  requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
                  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (ii)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


                                       /s/ Christopher W. Downie
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Christopher W. Downie
                                       Executive Vice President, Chief Operating
                                       Officer and Treasurer
                                       March 30, 2005

                                       /s/ Myrna J. Newman
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Myrna J. Newman
                                       Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
                                       March 30, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Motient Corporation and will be retained by Motient Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## MA**TERIA LS NOT INCLUDED IN** 

**AI RWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (A**  **D) DOCKET**

**FAA -**  **2012 -**  **0502** Docket Number
**2010 -**  **SW -**  **097 -** **AD** Directorate Identifier Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket Aeronautical Accessories, Inc., Alert Service Bulletin No. AA - 08055, Revision B, dated August 12, 2009 Aeronautical Accessories, Inc., Instructions for Continued Airworthiness for Crosstubes, Report No. AA - 01136, Revision K, dated February 15, 2012


### MA **Y BE VIEWED A T:**  Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region Rules Docket 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663 Fort W orth, Texas 76137 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-1928

_____________________________

RANDY JACKSON,

Appellant,

v.

RICKY D. DIXON, Secretary of 

Department of Corrections,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Hamilton County.

Fred L. Koberlein, Jr., Judge.

May 14, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

LEWIS, M.K. THOMAS, and NORDBY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Randy Jackson, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Anne C. Conley, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
# In the Missouri Court of Appeals

Eastern District

JANUARY 27, 2015

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE

84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

1. ED100807 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JEFFREY R. WEINHAUS,

APP

2. ED100846 QUINCY THREATS, APP V. STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

3. ED100999 PHILLI P SAMUELS, APP V FAIRFIELD CONDOMINIUM, RES

4. ED101347 IN THE INTEREST OF B. J. M.

5. ED101683 IN THE INTEREST OF: DAK, ACK, LGK & MJT
Protection Report RCPR ih July I999

Cogongrass

Imperuta cylindrica

Plant: A&frcssi~c, colony-forming

perennial grass, mostly 0.5-l .2 m

(I l/24 ft) tall. with upright or matforming light green leaves having

rough margins and an off-centered

midrib, from sharp-tipped whitescaly rhizomes with fibrous roots.

Stem:

by overlnppmg leat sheaths

to axxnding, hid&n

Leaves: Mainly basal, blades yellow-green to pale green with the

midrib slightly to mostly off-centcl

and whitish on the upper surface. 6-

18 mm (I 14-314 in) wide and 20-150

cm (X-60 in) long and shortest

upward. Flat or rolled to slightly

corrugated, narrowing at the base

with a long-tapering sharp tip, often

drooping, margins translucent and

minutely serrated. sheaths overlapping and hairy (or not) with hair tufts

near the throat. Ligule a fringed

membrane to I.1 mm (1116 in) long.

Flowers: March-May (year round in

central and south Florida). Single

terminal. silky, spike-like panicle.

3-20 cm (I 114-X in) long and 0.SP2.5 cm (3/16-l in) wide.

cylindrical and tightly branched. with paired spikelets, each 3-6

mm (l/&l/4 in) long, obscured hy silky. silvery white or creamcolored hair\ to I .8 mm (118 in) long.
§ 141.51 FERC Form No. 714, Annual Electric Balancing Authority Area and Planning Area Report. ( a ) *Who must file.* ( 1 ) Any electric utility, as defined by section 3(4) of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act, 16 U.S.C. 2602, operating a balancing authority area, and any group of electric utilities, which by way of contractual arrangements operates as a single balancing authority area, must complete and file the applicable schedules in FERC Form No. 714 with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
( 2 ) Any electric utility, or group of electric utilities that constitutes a planning area and that has a peak load greater than 200 megawatts (MW) based on net energy for load for the reporting year, must complete applicable schedules in FERC Form No. 714.
( b ) *When to file.* FERC Form No. 714 must be filed on or before each June 1 for the preceding calendar year.
( c ) *What to file.* FERC Form No. 714, Annual Electric Balancing Authority Area and Planning Area Report, must be filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission as prescribed in § 385.2011 of this chapter and as indicated in the General Instructions set out in this form.
[58 FR 52436, Oct. 8, 1993, as amended by Order 20723, 72 FR 20725, Apr. 26, 2007]
#### In re Interest of Tremayne and Terrell Campbell and Allen Reed, children under 18 years of age. State of Nebraska, appellee, v. Ella Louise Campbell, appellant.

303 N.W.2d 513

Filed March 20, 1981.

No. 43479.

*375Spencer W. Dillon for appellant.

Donald L. Knowles, Douglas County Attorney, and Francis T. Belsky for appellee.

Heard before Krivosha, C.J., Boslaugh, McCown, Clinton, Brodkey, White, and Hastings, JJ.

Boslaugh, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the separate juvenile court of Douglas County, Nebraska, terminating the parental rights of Ella Louise Campbell in Tremayne Campbell, born November 21, 1971; Terrell Campbell, born November 12, 1972; and Allen Reed, born April 22, 1975.

A petition alleging that the children were without proper support and care and that the defendant, Mrs. Campbell, was unable to provide support, care, and supervision was filed on July 25, 1979. On August 10, 1979, the juvenile court placed the children in foster care. An adjudication hearing was held on December 4, 1979, and parental rights were terminated on February 19,1980. The defendant was present at the hearings and was represented by counsel. The children were represented by a guardian ad litem. Only the defendant has appealed.

Proceedings involving the termination of parental rights are reviewed de novo in this court. Parental rights may be terminated where the record shows the parents have continuously and repeatedly neglected the children, have refused to give the children necessary parental care and protection, and such action is in the best interests of the children. *In re Interest of Moen, ante*p. 337, 303 N.W.2d 303 (1981).

*376The evidence shows that the defendant is now 25 years of age. She suffers from paranoid schizophrenia characterized by auditory and visual hallucinations for which she has been hospitalized on occasion. She also suffers from “blackouts” which are unrelated to her paranoid schizophrenia. She has a history of drug abuse but refused to cooperate when her physician sought to determine the presence of drugs. A psychiatrist testified that she had been uncooperative with any level of treatment and he refused to express an opinion as to whether she could properly care for her children if she received treatment for schizophrenia.

The children suffered from poor hygiene and were not properly fed or clothed. They frequently suffered from colds, were physically dirty and unkempt, exuded body odors, and often smelled of urine. The youngest child frequented the residence of a neighbor who stated that the child was often hungry and dirty. Mrs. Campbell was absent from the home for extended periods, leaving the children totally unsupervised. She and the children moved frequently, causing the children to be absent from school most of the time.

The record shows by clear and convincing evidence that the children suffered from a lack of parental care, support, and supervision and the defendant was unable to provide proper care, support, and supervision for them. The order terminating the parental rights of the defendant is affirmed.

Affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

EDWARD GRAZIANO, 

 Appellant 

 v. 

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS, JOHN WETZEL, 

NANCY GIROUX, CHERYL GILL, ET AL.,

 Appellees 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

58 EAP 2014 

Appeal from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court dated 9/23/14 at 

No. 473 MD 2014 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

 AND NOW, this 15th day of June, 2015, the direct appeal is QUASHED. 

Appellant’s Application to Correct the Factual Record (Pa.R.A.P. 2501(a)) is 

DISMISSED AS MOOT.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0000913497
<NAME>                        WNC HOUSING TAX CREDIT FUND IV, L.P., SERIES 2
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             0
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                             0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
§ 381.516 Commencement of a cooperative interstate shipment program; inspection by designated personnel and official mark. ( a ) A cooperative interstate shipment program will commence when the Administrator, in coordination with the State, has selected establishments in the State to participate in the program.
( b ) Inspection services for selected establishments participating in a cooperative interstate shipment program must be provided by designated personnel, who will be under the direct supervision of a State employee.
( c ) Poultry products processed in a selected establishment and inspected and passed by designated State personnel must bear an official Federal mark, stamp, tag, or label of inspection in the appropriate form prescribed in subpart M of this part that includes the information specified in § 381.515(c) of this subpart.
( d ) Poultry products processed in a selected establishment that comply with the conditions in paragraph (c) of this section may be distributed in interstate commerce.
# C_2011030EN.01006601.xml

| 29.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/66 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/66

---

Action brought on 8 November 2010 — Jacques Biwer and Others v Commission

(Case F-115/10)

()

2011/C 30/130

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Jacques Biwer (Bascharage, Luxembourg) and Others (represented by: F. Frabetti, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the Commission decision to consider certain financial assistance from a Member State to students in higher education to be an allowance of the same nature as family allowances and to deduct this financial assistance from the education allowance granted to officials who are parents of those students.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the PMO of Luxembourg, not notified to the applicants, by which certain financial assistance from the Luxembourg State, granted by CEDIES to students in higher education in Luxembourg or abroad, is henceforth to be considered to be an allowance of the same nature as those paid under Articles l, 2 and 3 of Annex VII of the Staff Regulations and, under Article 67(2), is to be deducted from the education allowance granted to officials who are parents of those students; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the PMO of Luxembourg, not notified to the applicants, by which certain financial assistance from the Luxembourg State, granted by CEDIES to students in higher education in Luxembourg or abroad, is henceforth to be considered to be an allowance of the same nature as those paid under Articles l, 2 and 3 of Annex VII of the Staff Regulations and, under Article 67(2), is to be deducted from the education allowance granted to officials who are parents of those students;

| — | annul the applicants’ monthly pay slips drawn up in accordance with the abovementioned decision from January 2010 and for the following months, drawing up new, amended pay slips as of January 2010. |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the applicants’ monthly pay slips drawn up in accordance with the abovementioned decision from January 2010 and for the following months, drawing up new, amended pay slips as of January 2010.

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
§ 202.122 Rule 22: Ex parte communications. ( a ) At no stage of the proceeding between its docketing and the issuance of the final decision shall the presiding officer or judicial officer discuss ex parte the merits of the proceeding with any party, or attorney or representative of a party: *Provided,* That procedural matters shall not be included within this limitation; and *Provided further,* That the presiding officer or judicial officer may discuss the merits of the case with such a person if all parties to the proceeding or their attorneys or representatives have been served with notice and an opportunity to participate. A memorandum of any such discussion shall be included in the record.
( b ) No party, or attorney or representative of a party, or other person not an employee of the Department, shall make or knowingly cause to be made to the presiding officer or judicial officer an ex parte communication relevant to the merits of the proceeding.
( c ) If the presiding officer or judicial officer receives an ex parte communication in violation of this section, the one who receives the communication shall place in the public record of the proceeding: ( 1 ) Such communication if written, or a memorandum stating the substance of such communication if oral; and
( 2 ) A copy of any written response or a memorandum stating the substance of any oral response thereto.
( d ) Copies of all such items placed or included in the record, as provided in this section, shall be served on all parties.
( e ) For purposes of this section “ex parte communication” means an oral or written communication not on the public record with respect to which reasonable prior notice to all parties is not given, but it shall not include a request for a status report on any matter or the proceeding.