alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

                    The                     **Federal Register**                     Notice for the ACRS Subcommittee Meeting on Reliability and Probabilistic Risk Assessment scheduled to be held on March 24, 2011, has been cancelled.                

                    The notice of this meeting was previously published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on Wednesday, March 2, 2011, [75 FR 11525].                

                    Further information regarding this meeting can be obtained by contacting John Lai, Designated Federal Official (Telephone: 301-415-5197, E-mail:                     *John.Lai@nrc.gov*) between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. (ET).                

Dated: March 2, 2011.

Yoira Diaz-Sanabria,

Acting Chief, Reactor Safety Branch B, Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards. 

[FR Doc. 2011-5338 Filed 3-10-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender.

STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Rural Development Announces Executive Leadership Changes

WASHINGTON, June 22, 2021 – USDA Rural Development Deputy Under Secretary Justin Maxson today 

announced Charles Stephens has been selected to serve as Assistant Administrator for Water and Environmental 

Programs.

Stephens has served his country for 25 years. He joined USDA in 2012. He most recently served as the

Associate Deputy Administrator for the Specialty Crop Program. In this role, Stephens oversaw all program 

activities, which include inspection and auditing, market news, promotion and economics, and marking order 

and agreements. He began his career as a financial manager in the U.S. Army, serving from 1996 to 2006. 

Stephens began his civilian career in 2006 as a Budget Analyst for the Defense Logistics Agency. When he 

joined USDA in 2012, he led a Farm Service Agency team responsible for managing the Commodity Credit 

Corporation budget. Stephens earned his Bachelor’s degree in Business Administration and his Master’s degree 

in Public Administration. In 2015, Stephens completed the Leadership for a Democratic Society program at the 

Federal Executive Institute. He currently lives in Bethesda, Md., with his wife and four children.

As Assistant Administrator for Water and Environmental Programs for USDA Rural Development, Stephens 

will be responsible for the Water and Environmental Program portfolio. His division administers funding 

programs that provide financing to thousands of rural communities across the country. These programs ensure 

rural communities have sustainable access to safe, modern and reliable water and wastewater infrastructure. 

Stephens began his new role on June 21, 2021. USDA encourages partners and stakeholders to reach out to 

Stephens in his new role to build on existing partnerships and forge new ones. 

If you’d like to subscribe to USDA Rural Development updates, visit our GovDelivery subscriber page.

###

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender
# C_2010301EN.01006201.xml

| 6.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/62 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/62

---

Action brought on 17 September 2010 — Global Steel Wire v Commission

(Case T-429/10)

()

2010/C 301/99

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Global Steel Wire, SA (Cerdanyola del Vallés, Spain) (represented by: F. González Díaz and A. Tresandí Blanco, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Principally, annul, under Article 263 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), Commission Decision C(2010) 4387 (final) of 30 June 2010 in Case COMP 38344 — Prestressing steel; |
| --- | --- |

—

Principally, annul, under Article 263 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), Commission Decision C(2010) 4387 (final) of 30 June 2010 in Case COMP 38344 — Prestressing steel;

| — | in the alternative, annul or reduce, under Article 261 TFEU, the amount of the fine imposed by that decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, annul or reduce, under Article 261 TFEU, the amount of the fine imposed by that decision;

| — | in any event, order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

in any event, order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The contested decision in these proceedings is the same as in Case T-426/10 (Moreda-Rivière Trefilerías v Commission).

Moreda-Rivière Trefilerías

Commission

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those advanced in that case.

In particular, the applicant submits that the European Commission failed to meet the standard of proof required by Community case-law when it held GSW liable for the conduct of its subsidiaries. The European Commission did not prove that GSW was able to exercise a decisive influence over the conduct of the companies in which it held shares.

---
# C_2011139EN.01001201.xml

| 7.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 139/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 139/12

---

Appeal brought on 10 November 2010 by Mariyus Noko Ngele against the order of the General Court (Third Chamber) made on 10 December 2009 in Case T-390/09 Mariyus Noko Ngele v European Commission

(Case C-525/10 P)

2011/C 139/19

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Mariyus Noko Ngele (represented by: F. Sabakunzi, avocat)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Other party to the proceedings:

By order of 10 March 2011, the Court of Justice (Eighth Chamber) declared the appeal inadmissible.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 586 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 586

 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to remove the 96-hour 
   physician certification requirement for inpatient critical access 
                           hospital services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 27, 2019

  Mr. Roberts (for himself, Mr. Tester, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Bennet, Ms. 
  Murkowski, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. Inhofe, and Mr. Rounds) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to remove the 96-hour 
   physician certification requirement for inpatient critical access 
                           hospital services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Critical Access Hospital Relief Act 
of 2019''.

SEC. 2. REMOVING MEDICARE 96-HOUR PHYSICIAN CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENT 
              FOR INPATIENT CRITICAL ACCESS HOSPITAL SERVICES.

    (a) In General.--Section 1814(a) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395f(a)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (6), by adding ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (7), at the end of subparagraph (E), by 
        striking ``and'' and inserting a period; and
            (3) by striking paragraph (8).
    (b) Application.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall apply 
with respect to items and services furnished on or after January 1, 
2020.
                                 <all>
```
### §2649. State and Federal law

#### (a) No preemption

Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed, interpreted, or applied to preempt, displace, or supplant any other State or Federal law, whether statutory or common.

#### (b) Cost and damage awards

Nothing in this subchapter or any standard, regulation, or requirement promulgated pursuant to this subchapter shall be construed or interpreted to preclude any court from awarding costs and damages associated with the abatement, including the removal, of asbestos-containing material, or a portion of such costs, at any time prior to the actual date on which such material is removed.

#### (c) State may establish more requirements

Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed or interpreted as preempting a State from establishing any additional liability or more stringent requirements with respect to asbestos in school buildings within such State.

#### (d) No Federal cause of action

Nothing in this subchapter creates a cause of action or in any other way increases or diminishes the liability of any person under any other law.

#### (e) Intent of Congress

It is not the intent of Congress that this subchapter or rules, regulations, or orders issued pursuant to this subchapter be interpreted as influencing, in either the plaintiff's or defendant's favor, the disposition of any civil action for damages relating to asbestos. This subsection does not affect the authority of any court to make a determination in an adjudicatory proceeding under applicable State law with respect to the admission into evidence or any other use of this subchapter or rules, regulations, or orders issued pursuant to this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 94–469, title II, §209, as added Pub. L. 99–519, §2, Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2986.)
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Jupiter Marine
International Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal
period ending October 26, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carl Herndon, Principal
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


By: /s/Carl Herndon
    ---------------------------
    Carl Herndon
    Principal Executive Officer
    July 17, 2003
### §1693i. Issuance of cards or other means of access

#### (a) Prohibition; proper issuance

No person may issue to a consumer any card, code, or other means of access to such consumer's account for the purpose of initiating an electronic fund transfer other than—

(1) in response to a request or application therefor; or

(2) as a renewal of, or in substitution for, an accepted card, code, or other means of access, whether issued by the initial issuer or a successor.

#### (b) Exceptions

Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (a), a person may distribute to a consumer on an unsolicited basis a card, code, or other means of access for use in initiating an electronic fund transfer from such consumer's account, if—

(1) such card, code, or other means of access is not validated;

(2) such distribution is accompanied by a complete disclosure, in accordance with section 1693c of this title, of the consumer's rights and liabilities which will apply if such card, code, or other means of access is validated;

(3) such distribution is accompanied by a clear explanation, in accordance with regulations of the Bureau, that such card, code, or other means of access is not validated and how the consumer may dispose of such code, card, or other means of access if validation is not desired; and

(4) such card, code, or other means of access is validated only in response to a request or application from the consumer, upon verification of the consumer's identity.

#### (c) Validation

For the purpose of subsection (b), a card, code, or other means of access is validated when it may be used to initiate an electronic fund transfer.

(Pub. L. 90–321, title IX, §911, as added Pub. L. 95–630, title XX, §2001, Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3736; amended Pub. L. 111–203, title X, §1084(1), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 2081.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2010—Subsec. (b)(3). Pub. L. 111–203 substituted "Bureau" for "Board".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2010 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 111–203 effective on the designated transfer date, see section 1100H of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as a note under section 552a of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
# C_2011080EN.01001003.xml

| 12.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 80/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 80/10

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 17 December 2010 — T.G. van Laarhoven v Staatssecretaris van Financiën

(Case C-594/10)

2011/C 80/20

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: T.G. van Laarhoven

Applicant:

Defendant: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Does the second subparagraph of Article 17(6) of the Sixth Directive (1) preclude amendments to deduction-limiting legislation such as that in question, according to which a Member State has sought to take advantage of the possibility, for which that provision provides, of (retaining) the exclusion of deduction in respect of certain goods and services if, as a consequence of those amendments, the amount excluded from deduction has been increased in most cases, but the approach and scheme of the deduction-limiting legislation have remained unchanged? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does the second subparagraph of Article 17(6) of the Sixth Directive (1) preclude amendments to deduction-limiting legislation such as that in question, according to which a Member State has sought to take advantage of the possibility, for which that provision provides, of (retaining) the exclusion of deduction in respect of certain goods and services if, as a consequence of those amendments, the amount excluded from deduction has been increased in most cases, but the approach and scheme of the deduction-limiting legislation have remained unchanged?

1

| 2. | If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative, should the national courts refrain from applying the deduction-limiting legislation as a whole, or is it sufficient for them to refrain from applying the legislation to the extent that it has increased the scale of the exclusion or restriction existing at the time when the Sixth Directive entered into force? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative, should the national courts refrain from applying the deduction-limiting legislation as a whole, or is it sufficient for them to refrain from applying the legislation to the extent that it has increased the scale of the exclusion or restriction existing at the time when the Sixth Directive entered into force?

---

(1)  Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1)

1

---
Phantom 3 Pre-Flight Inspection Check List

Pre-Flight Check List

 Visual inspection for defects

 Batteries fully charged and checked - Transmitter, UAS, iPad, iPhone, 

approved/compatible device

 Props tightened and locked

 SD card in camera

 Lens cap removed (As necessary)

 Antennae up and parallel

 Transmitter turned on (press once, release, then press and hold for 3 seconds)

 Ensure Transmitter is in P Mode

 UAS turned on (press once, release, then press and hold for 3 seconds)

 Flick the transformation switch on transmitter up and down 4 times quickly to convert 

from travel mode to flight mode or use the app

 DJI Pilot app quit and restarted, no other running apps on iPad

 Tap bar at top of app (Safe to Fly GPS) for full status

 Maps are cached (move the map around, zoom in an out)

 Minimum return height adjusted (check for tallest object and set accordingly)

 UAS placed in safe launch and recover position

 Home point reprogrammed via app

 Area clear of people / obstructions

Flight Check List

 Hover close for 20 seconds. Look / Listen for defects

 Confirm expected stick operation

 Monitor battery power

 Monitor signal strength

 Keep line-of-sight with UAS 

o Ensure area/zone of intended flight path is clear of other aerial traffic.

o Ensure area/zone of intended flight path is clear of any electrical/power lines

o Ensure atmospheric conditions are optimal for safe operation of UAV/UAS

o Select a safe zone to “ditch” the UAV/UAS in the event an emergency landing is required
# C_2015007EN.01002101.xml

| 12.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/21

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 November 2014 — Natura Selection v OHIM — Afoi Anezoulaki (natur)

(Case T-549/10) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark natur - Earlier application for the figurative mark natura - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2015/C 007/26)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Natura Selection, SL (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: E. Sugrañes Coca, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Afoi Anezoulaki AE (Kilikis, Greece)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 6 September 2010 (Case R 217/2010-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Natura Selection, SL and Afoi Anezoulaki AE.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 6 September 2010 (Case R 217/2010-2); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 6 September 2010 (Case R 217/2010-2);

| 2. | Orders OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders OHIM to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 46, 12.2.2011.

1

---
January 10, 2005 Page 1 of 1 

FACT SHEET 

Food Safety After a Tsunami 

To prevent foodborne diseases, wash your hands with clean water and soap before and after you eat or 

prepare food and after you use the latrine or bathroom. If you do not have clean water, use waterless 

hand sanitizers until clean water is available for washing. 

Do not eat any food that has not been sealed in waterproof containers (commercially canned or sealed 

plastic containers) and that may have come in contact with untreated water, such as seawater, 

floodwater, river water, or pond water. Throw away any food not in nonsealed, nonwaterproof containers 

that has come in contact with untreated water. 

Undamaged commercially canned foods can be saved. Remove the can labels, wash the outsides of the 

cans with soapy water, and thoroughly disinfect the cans using a solution of 1 cup (8 ounces; 

approximately 0.25 liters) of household bleach (5.25%) in 5 gallons (approximately 19 liters) of treated 

drinking-quality water. Use a marker to note the contents and expiration date on the cans. 

If opened food containers have screw caps, snap lids, crimped caps (soda pop bottles), twist caps, or flip 

tops, or if they have been home canned, throw them away if they have come in contact with untreated 

water. They cannot be disinfected. 

Feeding Infants 

If you are not breastfeeding, use only pre-prepared canned baby formula that requires no added water. 

Keeping Foods Cold 

If available, dry ice can be used to keep foods cold—25 pounds (approximately 11.5 kg) of dry ice will 

keep a 10-cubic-foot (283-liter) freezer below freezing for 3 to 4 days. Be careful when handling dry ice, 

because it freezes everything it touches. Wear dry, heavy gloves to avoid injury. As dry ice melts, it 

changes from a solid into a gas. Ventilate (air out) vehicles or rooms when transporting, storing, or using 

dry ice. Without good ventilation, gas from melting dry ice can build up and cause harmful effects, 

including unconciousness and death. 

Deciding About Thawed Food 

Thawed food can usually be eaten or refrozen if it is still "refrigerator cold" or if it still contains ice crystals. 

To be safe, remember, "When in doubt, throw it out." Discard any food that has been at room 

temperature for 2 hours or more, and any food that has an unusual odor, color, or texture. 

For more information, visit www.bt.cdc.gov, or call the CDC public response hotline 

at (888) 246-2675 (English), (888) 246-2857 (español), or (866) 874-2646 (TTY).