alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §313a. Establishment of meteorological observation stations in the Arctic region

In order to improve the weather forecasting service of the United States and to promote safety and efficiency in civil air navigation to the highest possible degree, the Secretary of Commerce shall, in addition to his other functions and duties, take such action as may be necessary in the development of an international basic meteorological reporting network in the Arctic region of the Western Hemisphere, including the establishment, operation, and maintenance of such reporting stations in cooperation with the State Department and other United States governmental departments and agencies, with the meteorological services of foreign countries and with persons engaged in air commerce.

(Feb. 12, 1946, ch. 4, §1, 60 Stat. 4; 1965 Reorg. Plan No. 2, §§1, 2, eff. July 13, 1965, 30 F.R. 8819, 79 Stat. 1318.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Appropriations

Section 2 of act Feb. 12, 1946, authorized appropriation of necessary funds to carry out provisions of this section.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Office of Chief of Weather Bureau abolished and functions transferred to Secretary of Commerce by Reorg. Plan No. 2 of 1965, eff. July 13, 1965, 30 F.R. 8819, 79 Stat. 1318. For further details, see notes set out under section 311 of this title.
#### § 1310.1 Purpose.

The purpose of the regulations in this part is to establish a schedule of fees to be charged in connection with the disposition and uses of, and activities affecting, real property in TVA's custody or control; approval of plans under section 26a of the Tennessee Valley Authority Act of 1933, as amended (16 U.S.C. 831y-1); and certain other activities in order to help ensure that such activities are self-sustaining to the full extent possible.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the report of Prospect Medical Holdings, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2009(the “Report”), I, Mike Heather, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| February 16,  2010 | **/**s**/**MIKE HEATHER     |
|-------------------------|-----------------------------|
| ** **              | **Mike Heather**            |
| ** **              | **Chief Financial Officer** |

 

----
### §1507. Additional Assistant Secretary; appointment; compensation; duties

There shall be in the Department of Commerce, in addition to the Assistant Secretaries now provided by law, one additional Assistant Secretary of Commerce who shall be appointed by the President by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall receive compensation at the rate prescribed by law for Assistant Secretaries of Commerce, and shall perform such duties as the Secretary of Commerce shall prescribe.

(Pub. L. 87–405, Feb. 16, 1962, 76 Stat. 9.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 592a–4 of Title 5 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, by Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 378.
#### § 318.3 Designation of places of receipt of products and other articles for reinspection.

Every official establishment shall designate, with the approval of the circuit supervisor, a dock or place at which products and other articles subject to reinspection under § 318.2 shall be received, and such products and articles shall be received only at such dock or place.
# C_2006331EN.01003201.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/32

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 12 December 2006 — Asociaciόn de Estaciones de Servicio de Madrid and Federaciόn Catalana de Estaciones de Servicio v Commission

(Case T-146/03) (1)

1

(State aid - Spanish law providing for measures in favour of the agricultural sector following the increase in fuel prices - Formal examination procedure provided for by Article 88(2) EC - Decision declaring that certain measures did not constitute aid - Action for annulment - Admissibility - Standing to bring proceedings - Duty to state reasons)

(2006/C 331/70)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicants: Asociaciόn de Empresarios de Estaciones de Servicio de la Comunidad Autόnoma de Madrid (Madrid, Spain) and Federaciόn Catalana de Estaciones de Servicio (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: R. Ortega Bueno and M. Delgado Echevarría, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: originally by J.L. Buendía Sierra, and subsequently by J.R. Vidal Puig)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: E. Braquehais Conesa, lawyer, and M. Muñoz Pérez, Agent)

Intervener in support of the defendant

Re:

Application for partial annulment of Commission Decision 2003/293/EC of 11 December 2002 on the measures implemented by Spain in the agricultural sector following the increase in fuel prices (OJ 2003 L 111, p. 24)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that Article 1 of Commission Decision of 11 December 2002 on the measures implemented by Spain in the agricultural sector following the increase in fuel prices is annulled in so far that it finds that the measures to support agricultural cooperatives provided for by Royal Decree Law 10/2000 de medidas urgentes de apoyo a los sectores agrario, pesquero y del transporte (Decree Law on emergency support for agriculture, fisheries and transport) do not constitute aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) EC. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that Article 1 of Commission Decision of 11 December 2002 on the measures implemented by Spain in the agricultural sector following the increase in fuel prices is annulled in so far that it finds that the measures to support agricultural cooperatives provided for by Royal Decree Law 10/2000 de medidas urgentes de apoyo a los sectores agrario, pesquero y del transporte (Decree Law on emergency support for agriculture, fisheries and transport) do not constitute aid within the meaning of Article 87(1) EC.

| 2. | Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicants. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicants.

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 171, of 19.7.2003.

1

---
SQN job no: 0705043 Client: NFWF Project: IYOR/NOAA Advertising Date: 18JAN08 

Stage: Final Option: C — Bulb Finished size: 24 x 36 inches
### §948. Contracts for medical care for retirees, dependents, and survivors: alternative delivery of health care

(a) The Secretary may contract for the delivery of health care to which covered beneficiaries are entitled under chapter 55 of title 10. The Secretary may enter into a contract under this section with any of the following:

(1) Health maintenance organizations.

(2) Preferred provider organizations.

(3) Individual providers, individual medical facilities, or insurers.

(4) Consortiums of these providers, facilities, or insurers.

(b) A contract entered into under this section may provide for the delivery of—

(1) selected health care services;

(2) total health care services for selected covered beneficiaries; or

(3) total health care services for all covered beneficiaries who reside in a geographic area designated by the Secretary.

(c) The Secretary may prescribe a premium, deductible, copayment, or other change for health care provided under this section.

(Added Pub. L. 101–595, title III, §319(a), Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 2989, §668; renumbered §948, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §107(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4205.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 668 of this title as this section.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Wehereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement on Form N-1A (the “RegistrationStatement”) of our report dated February 19, 2016, relating to the financial statements and financialhighlights which appears in the December 31, 2015 Annual Report to Shareholders of T. Rowe Price Small-CapValue Fund, Inc., which are also incorporated by reference into the Registration Statement. We also consentto the references to us under the headings “Financial Highlights”, “Independent RegisteredPublic Accounting Firm” and “Fund Service Providers” in such Registration Statement. 

/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPPricewaterhouseCoopers LLPBaltimore, MarylandApril27, 2016
**CL** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 2 2 - 0 557 STATE OF MONTANA ,

Plaintiff and Appellee , v. STEPHANIE DAWN BLANK,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including February 1 5 , 202 4 , within which to prepare, file, and serve the State’s response brief

.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 9 2024

01/09/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0557
Together, America Prospers

Farm Labor Housing Technical Assistance Grants

What does this 

program do?

USDA Rural Development awards 

grants to nonprofit organizations 

to provide technical assistance 

to applicants for Farm Labor 

Housing (FLH) loans and grants. 

These loans and grants are used 

to increase the availability of 

affordable, decent housing for 

farm laborers. 

Program Features

Funding

Announced through a Notice 

of Funding Availability (NOFA) 

placed in the Federal Register.

Funding Availability

Grant funds are limited, 

and are awarded through 

a competitive process.

Eligible Grantees

• Public and private 

nonprofit organizations

Use of Funds

• Eligible: technical assistance provided 

during the application, underwriting, 

and closing processes

• Eligible: assistance with transaction 

costs associated with the application 

process, and for other agencyapproved consultation, advisory 

and non-construction services

• Not Eligible: construction costs in 

any form

• Not Eligible: Transaction costs the 

FLH loan or grant will fund.

• Not Eligible: Transaction costs 

in which an identity of interest 

– such as between buyer and 

seller, or owner and lender – exists 

between grantees and applicants.

What governs this program?

• Off-Farm: 7 CFR 3560 

Subpart L, available at this link: 

https://go.usa.gov/xe97g

• Title V of the Housing Act of 

1949, available at this link: 

https://go.usa.gov/xMwFR

For More Information

Please contact Multifamily Housing 

toll-free at 800-292-8293, or visit 

https://www.rd.usda.gov/multifamily

and scroll to the bottom of the page 

to find the contact for your area.

NOTE: Because citations and other information are subject to change, always 

consult program instructions in the section above titled “What governs this 

program?” You can also contact the Multifamily Housing staff for assistance at 

this link: https://go.usa.gov/xeMKC. You will find additional forms, resources, 

and program information at rd.usda.gov. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, 

employer, and lender.

January 2022
#### § 4.1 Training.

The provisions of chapter 41, of title 5, United States Code, and Office of Personnel Management implementing regulations apply to Government Accountability Office employees.
### §5104. Manpower requirements plan

(a) In General.—On the date on which the President submits to the Congress a budget for fiscal year 2017 under section 1105 of title 31, on the date on which the President submits to the Congress a budget for fiscal year 2019 under such section, and every 4 years thereafter, the Commandant shall submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a manpower requirements plan.

(b) Scope.—A manpower requirements plan submitted under subsection (a) shall include for each mission of the Coast Guard—

(1) an assessment of all projected mission requirements for the upcoming fiscal year and for each of the 3 fiscal years thereafter;

(2) the number of active duty, reserve, and civilian personnel assigned or available to fulfill such mission requirements—

(A) currently; and

(B) as projected for the upcoming fiscal year and each of the 3 fiscal years thereafter;

(3) the number of active duty, reserve, and civilian personnel required to fulfill such mission requirements—

(A) currently; and

(B) as projected for the upcoming fiscal year and each of the 3 fiscal years thereafter;

(4) an identification of any capability gaps between mission requirements and mission performance caused by deficiencies in the numbers of personnel available—

(A) currently; and

(B) as projected for the upcoming fiscal year and each of the 3 fiscal years thereafter; and

(5) an identification of the actions the Commandant will take to address capability gaps identified under paragraph (4).

(c) Consideration.—In composing a manpower requirements plan for submission under subsection (a), the Commandant shall consider—

(1) the marine safety strategy required under section 2116 of title 46;

(2) information on the adequacy of the acquisition workforce included in the most recent report under section 5103 of this title; and

(3) any other Federal strategic planning effort the Commandant considers appropriate.

(Added Pub. L. 114–120, title I, §101(a), Feb. 8, 2016, 130 Stat. 30, §2904; renumbered §5104 and amended Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §§122(b), 123(b)(2), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4239, 4240.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282, §122(b), renumbered section 2904 of this title as this section.

Subsec. (c)(2). Pub. L. 115–282, §123(b)(2), substituted "section 5103" for "section 2903".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Additional Submissions

Commandant of the Coast Guard shall submit to the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives each plan required under this section, see section 101(f) of Pub. L. 114–120, set out as a note under section 5110 of this title.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 1929

_____________________________
M AURICE T. H ERRING , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court f or Leon County

. Robert R. Wheeler , Judge

. February 12, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. B.L. T HOMAS , C.J.
, and B ILBREY and J AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Maurice T. Herring, pro se
, Appellant.2 Ashley B. Moody , Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
### SUBCHAPTER I—FAIR TRADE IN AUTO PARTS
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 652 

To require the United States Postal Service to continue selling the Multinational Species Conservation Funds Semipostal Stamp until all remaining stamps are sold, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 5, 2019 

Mr. PORTMAN (for himself, Mr. UDALL, Mr. CARPER, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. 

MARKEY, and Mr. PETERS) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To require the United States Postal Service to continue 

selling the Multinational Species Conservation Funds 

Semipostal Stamp until all remaining stamps are sold, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Multinational Species 

5 Conservation Funds Semipostal Stamp Reauthorization 

6 Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 652 IS

1 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION; REQUIREMENT TO SELL ALL 

2 STAMPS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2(c) of the Multinational 

4 Species Conservation Funds Semipostal Stamp Act of 

5 2010 (39 U.S.C. 416 note; Public Law 111–241) is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) in paragraph (2)— 

8 (A) by striking ‘‘of at least 6 years,’’; and 

9 (B) by inserting before the period at the 

10 end the following: ‘‘and ending not earlier than 

11 the date on which the United States Postal 

12 Service provides notice to Congress under para13 graph (5)’’; and 

14 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

15 ‘‘(5) REQUIREMENT TO SELL ALL STAMPS

16 PRINTED.— 

17 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The United States 

18 Postal Service shall sell each copy of the Multi19 national Species Conservation Fund Semipostal 

20 Stamp that the United States Postal Service 

21 prints under this Act. 

22 ‘‘(B) NOTIFICATION OF CONGRESS.—The 

23 United States Postal Service shall notify the 

24 Committee on Homeland Security and Govern25 mental Affairs of the Senate and the Committee 

26 on Oversight and Reform of the House of RepVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:06 Mar 15, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S652.IS S652

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•S 652 IS

1 resentatives when all copies of the Multinational 

2 Species Conservation Fund Semipostal Stamp 

3 printed under this Act have been sold.’’. 

4 (b) RETROACTIVE APPLICABILITY.— 

5 (1) IN GENERAL.—The amendments made by 

6 subsection (a) shall take effect as if enacted on the 

7 day after the date of enactment of the Multinational 

8 Species Conservation Funds Semipostal Stamp Re9 authorization Act of 2013 (Public Law 113–165; 

10 128 Stat. 1878). 

11 (2) CONSEQUENCE OF DESTRUCTION OF

12 STAMPS.—If the United States Postal Service de13 stroys 1 or more Multinational Species Conservation 

14 Fund Semipostal Stamps before the date of enact15 ment of this Act, the United States Postal Service 

16 shall print and sell the same number of such stamps 

17 on or after that date of enactment. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
#### § 322.5 Uninspected tallow, stearin, oleo oil, etc., not to be exported unless certified as prescribed.

No tallow, stearin, oleo oil, or the rendered fat derived from the carcasses of livestock, that has not been inspected and passed, and so marked in compliance with the regulations in this subchapter shall be exported, unless the product has been denatured as required by § 314.5 or § 325.13 of this subchapter or identified and marked as prescribed by § 325.11 of this subchapter.

[35 FR 15604, Oct. 3, 1970, as amended at 47 FR 17274, Apr. 22, 1982]
### §1828. Rules and regulations

The Secretary is authorized to issue such rules and regulations as he deems necessary to carry out the provisions of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 91–540, §9, Dec. 9, 1970, 84 Stat. 1406.)
# C_2010179EN.01001502.xml

| 3.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/15

---

Appeal brought on 1 April 2010 by Nokia Oyj against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 20 January 2010 in Case T-460/07 Nokia Oyj v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(Case C-154/10 P)

(2010/C 179/25)

Language of the case: Finnish

Parties

Appellant: Nokia Oyj (represented by C. Rehaag, asianajaja)

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), Medion AG

Form of order sought

| — | set aside the judgment in Case T-460/07; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the judgment in Case T-460/07;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The appellant claims that the judgment of the General Court in Case T-460/07 should be set aside on the ground that the General Court wrongly considered in that judgment that there was a likelihood of confusion between the marks LIFE and LIFE BLOG and thus applied incorrectly Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94. (1) The applicant submits that by so doing the judgment infringed European Union law.

The General Court indeed found, as regards the similarity of the marks, that the subjects of comparison were the marks LIFE and LIFE BLOG, but then proceeded in a manner that clearly contradicted that finding, by assessing only the component LIFE of the composite mark LIFE BLOG in order to justify the conclusion that the marks were similar.

In that connection the General Court incorrectly examined the questions of what kind of consumers belonged to the relevant group and how the consumers understood the mark, and thereby infringed the principles recognised in the case-law of the Court of Justice.

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

---
Order Issued November ~, 2012

004

In The

No. 05-11-01501-CR

No. 05-11-01502-CR

KEVIN CALDWELL, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F09-25227-W and F09-72926-W

ORDER

Before the Court is the State of Texas’s October 31, 2012 Motion for Extension of Time to

File the State’s Brief. We GRANT the motion. The Clerk is directed to file the brief tendered by

the State on October 31, 2012.

ROBERT M. FILLMORE

PRESIDING JUSTICE
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6116

STEVEN GEORGE KELLY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees,

District Judge. (5:96-cr-00033-RLV-2; 5:04-cv-00071-RLV)

Submitted: August 21, 2008 Decided: August 26, 2008

Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven George Kelly, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C.F. Shappert,

United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
 2 

PER CURIAM:

Steven George Kelly seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Kelly has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED