alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Image
Innovations Holdings Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Derick Sinclair, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, that:

      (3)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (4)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.



Date: August 22, 2005
                                                  /s/ Derick Sinclair
                                                  ------------------------
                                                  Derick Sinclair
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
§ 115.31 Staff training. ( a ) The agency shall train, or require the training of, all employees who may have contact with immigration detainees, and all facility staff, to be able to fulfill their responsibilities under this part, including training on: ( 1 ) The agency's and the facility's zero-tolerance policies for all forms of sexual abuse;
( 2 ) The right of detainees and staff to be free from sexual abuse, and from retaliation for reporting sexual abuse;
( 3 ) Definitions and examples of prohibited and illegal sexual behavior;
( 4 ) Recognition of situations where sexual abuse may occur;
( 5 ) Recognition of physical, behavioral, and emotional signs of sexual abuse, and methods of preventing and responding to such occurrences;
( 6 ) How to avoid inappropriate relationships with detainees;
( 7 ) How to communicate effectively and professionally with detainees, including lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex, or gender nonconforming detainees;
( 8 ) Procedures for reporting knowledge or suspicion of sexual abuse; and
( 9 ) The requirement to limit reporting of sexual abuse to personnel with a need-to-know in order to make decisions concerning the victim's welfare and for law enforcement or investigative purposes.
( b ) All current facility staff, and all agency employees who may have contact with immigration detention facility detainees, shall be trained within one year of May 6, 2014, and the agency or facility shall provide refresher information every two years.
( c ) The agency and each facility shall document that staff that may have contact with immigration facility detainees have completed the training.
**Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 November 2011 – Hrbek v OHIM – Outdoor Group (ALPINE PRO SPORTSWEAR &
EQUIPMENT)**

**(Case T-434/10)**

Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the Community figurative mark ALPINE PRO SPORTSWEAR & EQUIPMENT – Earlier Community figurative mark ‘alpine’ – Misuse of power – Article 65(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009

Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services
– Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 31, 47, 65, 71-74)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 July 2010 (Case R 1441/2009-2) concerning opposition proceedings between The Outdoor Group Ltd and Mr Václav Hrbek. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders Mr Václav Hrbek to pay the costs. |
### **CHAPTER 81—HIGH-PERFORMANCE COMPUTING**

Sec.
5501.
Findings.
5502.
Purposes.
5503.
Definitions.

#### SUBCHAPTER I—HIGH-PERFORMANCE COMPUTING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

5511.
Networking and Information Technology Research and Development Program.
5512.
Grand Challenges in areas of national importance.
5513.
Repealed.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—AGENCY ACTIVITIES

5521.
National Science Foundation activities.
5522.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration activities.
5523.
Department of Energy activities.
5524.
Department of Commerce activities.
5525, 5526.
Repealed.
5527.
Miscellaneous provisions.
5528.
Repealed.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY HIGH-END COMPUTING REVITALIZATION

5541.
Definitions.
5542.
Department of Energy high-end computing research and development program.
5543.
Repealed.
5544.
Transferred.
### §278b. Working Capital Fund

#### (a) Utilization

The Institute is authorized to utilize in the performance of its functions the Working Capital Fund established by the Act of June 29, 1950 (64 Stat. 275).

#### (b) Availability of Fund

The working capital of the fund shall be available for obligation and payment for any activities authorized by this chapter, and for any activities for which provision is made in the appropriations which reimburse the fund.

#### (c) Reimbursements

In the performance of authorized activities, the Working Capital Fund shall be available and may be reimbursed for expenses of hire of automobile, hire of consultants, and travel to meetings, to the extent that such expenses are authorized for the appropriations of the Department of Commerce.

#### (d) Credits

The fund may be credited with advances and reimbursements, including receipts from non-Federal sources, for services performed under the authority of section 273 of this title.

#### (e) "Cost" defined

As used in this chapter, the term "cost" shall be construed to include directly related expenses and appropriate charges for indirect and administrative expenses.

#### (f) Distribution of earnings; restoration of prior impairment

The amount of any earned net income resulting from the operation of the fund at the close of each fiscal year shall be paid into the general fund of the Treasury: Provided, That such earned net income may be applied to restore any prior impairment of the fund, and to ensure the availability of working capital necessary to replace equipment and inventories.

(Mar. 3, 1901, ch. 872, §12, as added Aug. 3, 1956, ch. 906, §2, 70 Stat. 959; amended Pub. L. 95–322, §2(a), July 21, 1978, 92 Stat. 395; Pub. L. 99–73, §5(a), July 29, 1985, 99 Stat. 172; Pub. L. 100–418, title V, §5115(a)(1), Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1433.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Act of June 29, 1950 (64 Stat. 275), referred to in subsec. (a), was the Deficiency Appropriation Act, 1950. Provisions thereof relating to Working Capital Fund are not classified to the Code.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 12 of act Mar. 3, 1901, ch. 872, as added by act July 22, 1950, ch. 486, §2, 64 Stat. 373, related to equipment purchased by Department of Commerce to carry out investigations, prior to repeal by act Aug. 3, 1956.

#### Amendments

1988—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 100–418 substituted "Institute" for "National Bureau of Standards".

1985—Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 99–73 struck out "first" after "may be applied", and inserted provisions relating to working capital for replacement of equipment and inventories.

1978—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 95–322 struck out ", and additional amounts as from time to time may be required for the purposes of said fund are authorized to be appropriated" after "(64 Stat. 275)".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1985 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 99–73 effective Oct. 1, 1984, see section 5(c) of Pub. L. 99–73, set out as an Effective Date note under section 275c of this title.
Affirm and Opinion Filed May 27, 2014 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-14-00019-CR VICTORIA STUART, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Crimin al District Court No. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F10-62404-I 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Myers and Evans Opinion by Chief Justice Wright After a jury found Victoria Stuart guilty of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, it assessed her punishment at ten years’ imprisonmen t, probated for eight years, and a $10,000 fine. Based on the trial court’s findings following a h earing about why the reporter’s record has not been filed, we concluded appellant has abandoned her appeal. We ordered the appeal submitted without the reporter’s record and briefs. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 37.3(c), 38.8(b)(4). Absent briefs, no issues are before us. Finding no fundamental error, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Do Not Publish T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47 140019F.U05 /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE–2– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
VICTORIA STUART, Appellant
No. 05-14-00019-CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F10-62404-I. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright, Justices Myers and Evans participating. Based on the Court’s opin ion of this date, we AFFIRM the trial court’s judgment.
Judgment entered May 27, 2014

/Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
1 The Honorable Mark W. Bennett, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 03-1774

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Northern District of Iowa. Erasmo Martinez-Herrera, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: September 15, 2003 Filed: September 17, 2003

___________ Before BYE, BOWMAN, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Erasmo Martinez-Herrera pleaded guilty to illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), and the district court 1 sentenced him to 41 months imprisonment and 2 years supervised release. On appeal, counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that the district court abused its discretion in sentencing Martinez-Herrera at the top of the applicable Guidelines range.-2- We reject counsel’s argument because we do not review the district court’s exercise of discretion in setting a sentence at the top of a properly determined Guidelines range. See United States v. Smotherman , 326 F.3d 988, 989 (8th Cir. 2003) (per curiam); United States v. Woodrum , 959 F.2d 100, 101 (8th Cir. 1992) (per curiam). We have reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), and we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PERSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Gunther International Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Marc I. Perkins, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and, I, John K.
Carpenter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief that:

                  1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                           section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
                           Act of 1934; and

                  2.       The information contained in the Report fairly
                           presents, in all material respects, the financial
                           condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Marc I. Perkins
-------------------
Marc I. Perkins
Chief Executive Officer
July 8, 2003

/s/ John K. Carpenter
---------------------
John K. Carpenter
Chief Financial Officer
July 8, 2003

         A signed original of this certification has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certifications are
accompanying the Company's Form 10-KSB solely pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63
of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form
10-KSB or as a separate disclosure document.
### §3362. Emergency purchase authority

#### (a) Presidential authorization

During any natural gas supply emergency declared under section 3361 of this title, the President may, by rule or order, authorize any interstate pipeline or local distribution company served by any interstate pipeline to contract, upon such terms and conditions as the President determines to be appropriate (including provisions respecting fair and equitable prices), for the purchase of emergency supplies of natural gas—

(1) from any producer of natural gas (other than a producer who is affiliated with the purchaser, as determined by the President) if—

(A) such natural gas is not produced from the Outer Continental Shelf; and

(B) the sale or transportation of such natural gas was not pursuant to a certificate issued under the Natural Gas Act [15 U.S.C. 717 et seq.] immediately before the date on which such contract was entered into; or

(2) from any intrastate pipeline, local distribution company, or other person (other than an interstate pipeline or a producer of natural gas).

#### (b) Contract duration

The duration of any contract authorized under subsection (a) may not exceed 4 months. The preceding sentence shall not prohibit the President from authorizing under subsection (a) a renewal of any contract, previously authorized under such subsection, following the expiration of such contract.

#### (c) Related transportation and facilities

The President may, by order, require any pipeline to transport natural gas, and to construct and operate such facilities for the transportation of natural gas, as he determines necessary to carry out any contract authorized under subsection (a). The costs of any construction or transportation ordered under this subsection shall be paid by the purchaser of natural gas under the contract with respect to which such order is issued. No order to transport natural gas under this subsection shall require any pipeline to transport natural gas in excess of such pipeline's available capacity.

#### (d) Maintenance of adequate records

The Commission shall require any interstate pipeline or local distribution company contracting under the authority of this section for natural gas to maintain and make available full and adequate records concerning transactions under this section, including records of the volumes of natural gas purchased under the authority of this section and the rates and charges for purchase and receipt of such natural gas.

#### (e) Special limitation

No sale under any emergency purchase contract under this section for emergency supplies of natural gas for sale and delivery from any intrastate pipeline which is operating under court supervision as of January 1, 1977, may take effect unless the court approves.

(Pub. L. 95–621, title III, §302, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3382.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Natural Gas Act, referred to in subsec. (a)(1)(B), is act June 21, 1938, ch. 556, 52 Stat. 821, which is classified generally to chapter 15B (§717 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this act to the Code, see section 717w of this title and Tables.
Exhibit 13.2

GRUPO TELEVISA, S.A.B.

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER

I, Salvi Rafael Folch Viadero, the Chief Financial Officer of Grupo Televisa, S.A.B. (the Company), hereby certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|1. | The Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, to which this statement is filed as an exhibit (the Report),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 11, 2013



By:

/s/ Salvi Rafael Folch ViaderoName:

Salvi Rafael Folch ViaderoTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
### §3707. National Science Foundation Cooperative Research Centers

#### (a) Establishment and provisions

The National Science Foundation shall provide assistance for the establishment of Cooperative Research Centers. Such Centers shall be affiliated with a university, or other nonprofit institution, or a group thereof. The objective of the Centers is to enhance technological innovation as provided in section 3705(a) of this title through the conduct of activities as provided in section 3705(b) of this title.

#### (b) Planning grants

The National Science Foundation is authorized to make available nonrenewable planning grants to universities or nonprofit institutions for the purpose of developing the plan, as described under section 3705(c)(3) of this title.

#### (c) Terms and conditions

Grants, contracts, and cooperative agreements entered into by the National Science Foundation in execution of the powers and duties of the National Science Foundation under this chapter shall be governed by the National Science Foundation Act of 1950 [42 U.S.C. 1861 et seq.] and other pertinent Acts.

(Pub. L. 96–480, §9, formerly §8, Oct. 21, 1980, 94 Stat. 2316; Pub. L. 99–502, §9(b)(11), (12), (e)(2)(B), Oct. 20, 1986, 100 Stat. 1796, 1797; renumbered §9, Pub. L. 100–418, title V, §5122(a)(1), Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1438; Pub. L. 106–404, §7(4), Nov. 1, 2000, 114 Stat. 1745.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The National Science Foundation Act of 1950, referred to in subsec. (c), is act May 10, 1950, ch. 171, 64 Stat. 149, which is classified generally to chapter 16 (§1861 et seq.) of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1861 of Title 42 and Tables.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 9 of Pub. L. 96–480 was renumbered section 10 and is classified to section 3708 of this title.

#### Amendments

2000—Subsecs. (a), (b). Pub. L. 106–404 made technical amendments to references in original act which appear in text as references to section 3705 of this title.

1986—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 99–502 substituted "Cooperative Research Centers" for "Centers for Industrial Technology" and struck out last sentence which read as follows: "The provisions of sections 3705(e) and 3705(f) of this title shall apply to Centers established under this section."
### **CHAPTER 89—PROFESSIONAL BOXING SAFETY**

Sec.
6301.
Definitions.
6302.
Purposes.
6303.
Boxing matches in States without boxing commissions.
6304.
Safety standards.
6305.
Registration.
6306.
Review.
6307.
Reporting.
6307a.
Contract requirements.
6307b.
Protection from coercive contracts.
6307c.
Sanctioning organizations.
6307d.
Required disclosures to State boxing commissions by sanctioning organizations.
6307e.
Required disclosures for promoters.
6307f.
Required disclosures for judges and referees.
6307g.
Confidentiality.
6307h.
Judges and referees.
6308.
Conflicts of interest.
6309.
Enforcement.
6310.
Notification of supervising boxing commission.
6311.
Studies.
6312.
Professional boxing matches conducted on Indian reservations.
6313.
Relationship with State law.
###### Editorial Note on Part 28

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear at 76 FR 76873, Dec. 9, 2011.

#### § 28.48 Service.

Service of a subpoena may be made by a United States Marshal or Deputy Marshal or by any person who is over 18 years of age and not a party to the proceeding.
§ 75.1 Contractors' and vendors' certificates. ( a ) The Government Accountability Office no longer requires that a certificate as to correctness and nonpayment be executed on the bills and invoices of contractors and vendors, with the exception that carriers, or other corporations, agencies, or persons furnishing transportation and accessorial services to the Government must continue to execute the certificates as provided in chapter 101 of 41 CFR part 41. Pending the eventual elimination of the contractors' and vendors' certificates from all other standard voucher forms, the certificates on such other forms need no longer be executed. However, the elimination of this requirement does not dispense with the necessity for the specific certification of facts required by certain contracts.
( b ) The omission of the certificate from bills or invoices submitted for payment to Government agencies does not in any manner lessen the responsibility of contractors and vendors in complying with all statutory requirements applicable to transactions with the Government, nor will it be construed as mitigating their liability for asserting false, fictitious, or fraudulent claims against the United States, penalties for which are set forth in 18 U.S.C. 287.
[22 FR 10906, Dec. 28, 1957, as amended at 47 FR 50843, Nov. 10, 1982; 47 FR 56980, Dec. 22, 1982]
# C_2010260EN.01001501.xml

| 25.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/15

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 22 July 2010 — IDIAP Foundation v Commission

(Case T-286/10 R)

(Application for interim measures - Sixth framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration actions - Letter confirming the findings of a financial audit - Application for suspension of operation and for interim measures - No urgency)

2010/C 260/20

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: IDIAP Research Institute Foundation (Martigny, Switzerland) (represented by: G. Chapus-Rapin, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Dintilhac and A. Sauka, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Essentially, application for suspension of operation of the Commission’s letter of 11 May 2010 confirming the findings of the audit concerning the breakdowns of costs submitted by the applicant, in respect of the period from 1 October 2006 to 30 September 2007 as regards the Amida project and in respect of the period from 1 January 2006 to 31 December 2007 as regards the Bacs and Dirac projects.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Costs are reserved.

---
### §4629. Avoidance of duplication

In carrying out the Initiative, the Secretary of Energy shall ensure that unnecessary duplicative research is not performed at the research facilities (including the national laboratories of the Department of Energy) that are participating in the Initiative.

(Pub. L. 100–180, div. C, title I, §3149, Dec. 4, 1987, 101 Stat. 1244.)