alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 98.3 General conditions. Except as provided in subpart B of this part, an animal embryo shall not be imported into the United States unless it is from a region listed under § 94.1(a) of this chapter as being free of foot-and-mouth disease, and: ( a ) The embryo is exported to the United States from the region in which it was conceived;
( b ) The embryo was conceived as a result of artificial insemination with semen collected from a donor sire at an approved artificial insemination center, or the embryo as conceived as a result of natural breeding by a donor sire at an approved embryo transfer unit;
( c ) If artificially inseminated, the donor dam conceived the embryo after being inseminated in an approved embryo transfer unit with semen collected at an approved artificial insemination center;
( d ) At the time of collection of the semen used to conceive the embryo or at the time of natural breeding, the donor sire met all requirements the donor sire would have to meet under part 93 of this chapter for a health certificate required as a condition of importation into the United States; *except that,* for sheep and goats only, the donor sire must meet the scrapie requirements in § 98.35 instead of the requirements in § 93.435 of this chapter;
( e ) At the time of collection of the embryo from the donor dam, the donor dam met all requirements the donor dam would have to meet under part 93 of this chapter for a health certificate required as a condition of importation into the United States; *except that,* for sheep and goats only, the donor dam must meet the requirements for embryo donors in § 98.10(a) instead of the requirements in § 93.435 of this chapter;
( f ) There is no basis for denying an import permit for the donor sire or donor dam under § 93.304(a)(2) for horses, § 93.404(a)(3) or (4) for ruminants, and § 93.504(a)(2) or (3) for swine of this chapter;
( g ) The embryo is collected and maintained under conditions determined by the Administrator to be adequate to protect against contamination of the embryo with infectious animal disease organisms; and
( h ) The embryo was determined, based on microscopic examination, to have an intact zona pellucida at the time the embryo was placed into its immediate container (straw or ampule) for shipping.
( i ) The embryo is contained in a shipping container which at the time of offer for entry is sealed with an official seal which was affixed to the shipping container by a full-time salaried veterinarian of the national animal health service of the region of origin or by a veterinarian authorized to do so by the national animal health service of the region of origin.
[50 FR 43563, Oct. 25, 1985, as amended at 55 FR 31558, Aug. 2, 1990; 56 FR 55809, Oct. 30, 1991; 57 FR 29194, July 1, 1992; 62 FR 56025, Oct. 28, 1997; 77 FR 1396, Jan. 10, 2012; 83 FR 15494, Apr. 11, 2018; 86 FR 68863, Dec. 3, 2021]
CJ 

CJ 

CJ 

CJ 

-

-

r

- -

2023 RMA Crops' Indemnities 

No Indemnity ($0.00)

$0.01 - $1,000,000.00

$1,000,000.01 - $10,000,000.00 

$10,000,000.01 - $25,000,000.00 

$25,000,000.01 - $50,000,000.00 

$50,000,000.01 - $88,765,801.00 

MapCreationDate:October12,2023

LayerCredits :USDA&USCens u s Bu reau

Sou rce:USDARis kManag ementAg ency -Su m mary ofBu s ines s

DataCu rent Date:October10,2023

This map depicts weekly crop insurance indemnity data by county as of the data current date denoted on the map MapProjection:USAContig u ou s Albers Equ alAreaConic

RMA Risk Management Services Division

Theinformationdisplayedinthis mapis intendedtoserveas anaidindis playing dataprovidedors toredby theRis kManag ementAg ency.It does not modify,replaceors u pers edeany USDApu blishedpolicy provis ions orprocedu res.

Maps createdby USDARiskManag ementAg ency arefors patialandvis u alcontext fordepicting thebas icinformationfor“where”.Maps arenot cons ideredas u rvey.GeneralReferenceOnly. 

-Pu blicInformationand is published biweekly.
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Seeks Additional Input on How to Use Inflation Reduction Act Funding to 

Advance Clean Energy in Rural America

Roundtables on Jan. 25 and Jan. 26 to Get Feedback from Rural Communities,

Leaders and Organizations

WASHINGTON, Jan. 25, 2023 – U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Rural Development Under 

Secretary Xochitl Torres Small today announced that USDA is hosting Inflation Reduction Act (IRA)

roundtables. USDA will seek more input on how to provide IRA funding through USDA Rural Development’s 

Rural Utilities Service programs and advance clean energy for people in rural America. These roundtables 

follow listening sessions, a Tribal consultation and a written comment period that USDA made available in 

2022. 

“These roundtables give us a chance to listen to some of the most important issues on our stakeholders’ minds, 

including how to use this funding to deal with stranded assets; what design will result in the greatest reduction 

of greenhouse gases; ways to ensure benefits reach communities most in need; and how to ensure energy 

becomes more affordable and reliable for rural Americans,” Torres Small said.

The IRA represents the largest investment in rural electrification since the enactment of the Rural Electrification 

Act in 1936. The IRA provides funding to USDA Rural Development to help eligible entities deploy and use 

renewable energy and zero-emission energy systems. It will also help them make energy-efficiency 

improvements that will significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions. This historic commitment to rural clean 

energy development gives USDA Rural Development important financing tools to help rural communities 

reduce climate pollution; ensure access to advanced, secure, affordable power; create new jobs and keep rural 

people and economies prepared for the future. 

Each roundtable will focus on specific rural topics to help advance clean energy for people in rural America. 

USDA is hosting roundtables on issues related to the following rural constituencies:

• January 25 at 1 p.m. ET - stakeholders who are interested in expanding equity in rural areas. To

register, visit: Webinar Registration - Zoom (zoomgov.com).

• January 26 at 4 p.m. ET - distribution cooperatives for Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho,

Minnesota, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oregon, South Dakota, Utah, Washington,

Wisconsin, Wyoming and all territories. To register, visit: Webinar Registration - Zoom

(zoomgov.com).

To subscribe to USDA Rural Development updates, visit GovDelivery subscriber page. 

###

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
# C_2010328EN.01005502.xml

| 4.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/55

---

Action brought on 7 October 2010 — Bank Saderat v Council

(Case T-495/10)

()

2010/C 328/85

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Bank Saderat plc (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Gadhia, S. Ashley, Solicitors, D. Anderson, QC and R. Blakeley, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | annul paragraph 5 of Table B of the Annex to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2010 (1) in so far as it relates to the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul paragraph 5 of Table B of the Annex to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2010 (1) in so far as it relates to the applicant;

1

| — | annul paragraph 7 of Table B of Annex II to Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP (2) in so far as it relates to the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul paragraph 7 of Table B of Annex II to Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP (2) in so far as it relates to the applicant;

2

| — | declare Article 7(2)(d) of Council Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 (3) inapplicable to the applicant; and |
| --- | --- |

—

declare Article 7(2)(d) of Council Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 (3) inapplicable to the applicant; and

3

| — | order the Council to pay the costs of the application. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council to pay the costs of the application.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In the present case the applicant seeks the partial annulment of Council Implementing Regulation No 668/2010 and of Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP in so far as the applicant is included on the list of natural and legal persons, entities and bodies whose funds and economic resources are frozen in accordance with this provision. Furthermore, the applicant applies, in accordance with Article 277 TFUE, for the inapplicability of Article 7(2)(d) of Council Regulation (EC) No 423/2007.

The pleas in law and main arguments relied on by the applicant are identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-492/10 Melli Bank v Council.

Melli Bank

Council

---

(1)  Council implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2010 of 26 July 2010 implementing Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 concerning restrictive measures against Iran, OJ 2010 L 195, p. 25

1

(2)  Council Decision of 26 July 2010 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Common Position 2007/140/CFSP, OJ 2010 L 195, p. 39

2

(3)  Council Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 of 19 April 2007 concerning restrictive measures against Iran, OJ 2007 L 103, p. 1

3

---
### §1681s–1. Information on overdue child support obligations

Notwithstanding any other provision of this subchapter, a consumer reporting agency shall include in any consumer report furnished by the agency in accordance with section 1681b of this title, any information on the failure of the consumer to pay overdue support which—

(1) is provided—

(A) to the consumer reporting agency by a State or local child support enforcement agency; or

(B) to the consumer reporting agency and verified by any local, State, or Federal Government agency; and

(2) antedates the report by 7 years or less.

(Pub. L. 90–321, title VI, §622, as added Pub. L. 102–537, §2(a), Oct. 27, 1992, 106 Stat. 3531.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 622 of Pub. L. 90–321 was renumbered section 625 and is classified to section 1681t of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 1, 1993, see section 2(d) of Pub. L. 102–537, set out as an Effective Date of 1992 Amendment note under section 1681a of this title.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 January 10, 2020

s0107

Order 

Clerk

January 10, 2020

160682 & (5)(6)(7)

MELVIN NYLAAN and MARLENE J.

NYLAAN,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v SC: 160682

COA: 351895

Kent CC: 17-010716-CZ

WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant,

and

3M COMPANY,

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The motion for stay of enforcement of the Kent Circuit Court’s December 13, 2019 order 

and the motion for waiver of requirement to move for stay in the trial court are DENIED. 

The application for leave to appeal prior to decision by the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that the questions 

presented should be reviewed by this Court before consideration by the Court of Appeals.
# C_2011319EN.01001702.xml

| 29.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 319/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 319/17

---

Judgment of the General Court of 22 September 2011 — Kingdom of Spain v European Commission

(Case T-67/10) (1)

1

(EAGGF - Guidance Section - Reduction of financial assistance - Financial assistance awarded to an operational programme for the improvement of the processing and marketing of agricultural products - Effectiveness of checks - Proportionality)

2011/C 319/34

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: M. Muñoz Pérez, abogado del Estado)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Jimeno Fernández and G. von Rintelen, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 9827 of 10 December 2009 applying financial corrections to the EAGGF assistance, Guidance Section, awarded to the operational programme CCI 2000.ES.16.1.PO.007 (Spain, Castilla y León) in relation to the measure improving processing and marketing of agricultural products.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 100, 17.4.2010.

1

---
#### § 354.14 Authority to waive provisions of § 354.12.

The Administrator is authorized to waive the provisions of § 354.12 which pertain to the entry of uninspected edible products into official plants in specific instances where rabbits are to be brought into compliance with a law under the provisions of a court order. Such rabbits shall be handled in an official plant in accordance with such procedures as the Administrator may prescribe to insure proper segregation and identity of the rabbits or rabbit products until they are shipped from the official plant.
Joel Hayes 

Notice of Errata 

1 of 2

BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF AVIATION ENFORCEMENT AND PROCEEDINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

------------------------------------------------------ ) 

 ) 

Joel Hayes, ) 

 third-party complainant ) 

 ) 

v. ) Docket DOT-OST-2014-0077 

 ) 

American Airlines, Inc. ) 

 ) 

------------------------------------------------------ ) 

NOTICE OF ERRATA 

1. Paragraph five of my complaint contains the following sentence: “While I 

have flown Internationally twice before in the last few years, this was my first chance to 

actually have an upgrade to Business on an International flight.” This sentence contains 

a typographical error and a factual error, both of which resulted from editing. 

2. The correct sentence is as follows: “While I have flown internationally 

twice in the last few years, this was only my first chance to have what I hoped would be a 

round-trip upgrade to business class on an international flight.” 

3. I apologize for the error. 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ 

Joel Hayes 
Joel Hayes 

Notice of Errata 

2 of 2

Certificate of Service 

I hereby certify that I have, this 9th day of June, 2014 caused a copy of the foregoing 

Notice to be served by electronic mail on the following persons: 

Robert Silverberg, Esq. rsilverberg@sgbdc.com 

Robert Gorman, Esq. robert.gorman@dot.gov 

 /s/ 

 _____________________ 

 Joel Hayes
#### §§ 1313.104-1313.109 [Reserved]
UAVSA Release 1.4 2015



# Company Protocol

1. All participants are required to call out “ Safety First ” it they spot a problem

or danger.

2. The Company expects and requires all individuals to be sober of mind and

body.

3. A zero tolerance for all d rugs and a lcohol will be applied to ev eryone on location representing Company and any other participants

.

4. All Company crew and staff involved with any and a ll UAS services are

expected to have thoroughly reviewed the project, schedule, and project

li st prior t o project

.

5. All Company e mployees are expected t o follow all C ompany protocols and

Checklists.

6. Be on location on time

.

7. Communicate all of the time with everyone involved in flight operations

.

8. Always make “ Safety First ” and have f irst a id k it at all operation locations.

9. Never leave UAS batteries spent, charged or otherwise loose at any

location and properly dispose of all failed batteries through proper

channels.

10. Company staff and personnel must always maintain and high degree of

professionalism, meaning following the Operations and Protocols as

present by the PIC and or Location Director.

11. Never leave locations until area has been fully policed and all trash, debris

or disorder has be en cleaned

.

12. Report any unlawful or illegal request or action immediately to Company

directors and / or authorities.

13. Inspect, clean, organize, package

, and take inventory of all UAS Company

equipment at the completion of project.

14. Never leave fuel, matches, o r any combustibles at locations.

15. Report lost or questionable misplaced equipment, supplies or other

Company items of importance such as documents, logs, maps, etc.
```

[113th Congress Public Law 258]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 128 STAT. 2927]]

Public Law 113-258
113th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 161 Live Oak Street in Miami, Arizona, as the ``Staff Sergeant Manuel 
   V. Mendoza Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Dec. 18, 2014 -  [H.R. 
                                4416]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. STAFF SERGEANT MANUEL V. MENDOZA POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Redesignation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 161 Live Oak Street in Miami, Arizona, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Staff Sergeant Manuel V. Mendoza Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Staff 
Sergeant Manuel V. Mendoza Post Office Building''.

    Approved December 18, 2014.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4416:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 160 (2014):
            July 14, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 15, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
P. 1


# OAR Box 1830 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 87 ) IV-C-5

3 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 11/13/20087:20:55AM Sheet 87 of 232P. 2

UNITED STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIONAGENCY

WASHINGTON

, D.C. 20460 FE B 2 !98 8

OFFIC E O F AI RAN D RADIATIO N Honorabl e Carrol l Hubbar d Unite d State s Hous e o f Representative s Washington , D.C . 2051 5 Dea r Mr . Hubbard : Thi s i s i n respons e t o you r January19 , 198 8 lette r relaying th e concern s o f you r constituent , Mr . Alber t Sisk , regarding EPA' s regulatoryproposa l t o requir e onboar d canister s o n ne wvehicle s t o contro l refueling emissions . T o assis t yo u wit hyou r response , I hav e enclose d a copyo f ou r proposa l fo r you r review . Sectio n E (page s 31177-31182 ) explain s EPA' s overal l rational e fo r proposin g onboar d 0 controls . I f yo u woul d lik e furthe r detail s o f ou r analysis , . * pleas e contac t Mr . Phili p Carlso n o f th e Standard s Developmen t an

d Suppor t Branc ho f th e Emissio n Contro l TechnologyDivision , 256 5 Plymout hRoad , An n Arbor , Michiga n 4810 5 (FT S 374-827 0 o r Commercia l (313 ) 668-4270) . Thank yo u fo r you r letter . W e wil l plac e th e lette r fro mMr . Sis k i n ou r publi c docke t an d full yconside r hi s comment s i n th e nex t phas e o f ou r rulemaking process . Sincerel yyours , 'lllil ORIGINA LSIGNE D B Y•• • RICHAR D D
. WILSO N Richar d D . Wilso n Director , Offic e o f Mobil e Source s Enclosur e cc : Docke t A-87-1 1 Prepare d by : For

mLetter:sal : 1/28/88.-AL880342 - ECTD , An n Arbor , MI

• BCC : Regio

n 0 4 Congressional Llalson/Quin n
# C_2013114EN.01001001.xml

| 20.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 114/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 114/10

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 21 February 2013 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Brussel (Belgium)) — RVS Levensverzekeringen NV v Belgische Staat

(Case C-243/11) (1)

1

(Direct life assurance - Annual tax on assurance transactions - Directive 2002/83/EC - Articles 1(1)(g) and 50 - Definition of ‘Member State of the commitment’ - Assurance undertaking established in the Netherlands - Policyholder having taken out an assurance contract in the Netherlands and transferred his habitual residence to Belgium after the contract was concluded - Freedom to provide services)

2013/C 114/12

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Brussel

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: RVS Levensverzekeringen NV

Appellant:

Respondent: Belgische Staat

Respondent:

Re:

Re:

Request for a preliminary ruling — Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Brussel — Interpretation of Article 50 of Directive 2002/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 November 2002 concerning life assurance (OJ 2002 L 345, p. 1) — National rule subjecting insurance transactions to an annual tax when the risk is situated in Belgium, either because the natural person insured is habitually resident there or because the legal person insured is established there — Assurance undertaking established in the Netherlands, without any presence in Belgium except for one of its policyholders, who moved to Belgium after the contract was concluded — Place of taxation — Article 49 and Article 56 TFEU — Restrictions

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 50 of Directive 2002/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 November 2002 concerning life assurance must be interpreted as not precluding a Member State from collecting an indirect tax on life assurance premiums paid by policyholders who are natural persons having their habitual residence in that Member State, when the assurance contracts concerned were taken out in another Member State in which those policyholders had their habitual residence on the date the contracts were taken out.

---

(1)  OJ C 252, 27.8.2011.

1

---