alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010113EN.01005901.xml

| 1.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/59

---

Action brought on 15 February 2010 — Inter IKEA Systems v OHIM — Meteor Controls (GLÄNSA)

(Case T-88/10)

2010/C 113/91

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Inter IKEA Systems B.V. (Delft, The Netherlands) (represented by: J. Gulliksson, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Meteor Controls International Limited (Cookstown, Ireland)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 1 December 2009 in case R 529/2009-2; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 1 December 2009 in case R 529/2009-2; and

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs incurred both in these proceedings and in the proceedings before it. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs incurred both in these proceedings and in the proceedings before it.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark “GLÄNSA”, for goods in class 11

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited: Community trade mark registration of the word mark “GLANZ”, for goods in classes 6, 9 and 11

Mark or sign cited:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the trade mark applied for in its entirety

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009 as the Board of Appeal failed to make a correct global assessment and comparison of the trade marks concerned, thereby wrongly finding that these were similar and, as a result, that there was a likelihood of confusion between them.

Pleas in law:

---
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

Foreclosure and Eviction Relief in Connection with Presidentially Declared COVID-19 National 

Emergency 

WASHINGTON, March 19, 2020 – The purpose of this announcement is to inform lenders of a foreclosure 

and eviction moratorium for all USDA Single-Family Housing Guaranteed Loan Program (SFHGLP) loans for 

a period of 60 days, in connection with the Presidentially declared COVID-19 National Emergency.

Effective immediately, borrowers with USDA guaranteed loans are subject to a moratorium on foreclosure for a 

period of 60 days. The moratorium applies to the initiation of foreclosures and to the completion of foreclosures 

in process. 

Similarly, evictions of persons from properties secured by USDA guaranteed loans are also suspended for a 

period of 60 days. 

In addition, deadlines of the first legal action and reasonable diligence timelines are extended by 60 days. 

Loan servicers seeking to assist SFHGLP borrowers may also pursue any of the relief options referenced in 

Chapter 18 of the program Handbook found at: https://www.rd.usda.gov/files/hb-1-3555.pdf. 

Questions regarding program policy and this announcement may be directed to the National Office Division at 

sfhgld.program@usda.gov or (202) 720-1452. 

Thank you for your support of the Single-Family Housing Guaranteed Loan Program! 

Links to websites: 

SFHGLP Lending Partner Webpage: https://www.rd.usda.gov/page/sfh-guaranteed-lender

SFHGLP webpage: https://www.rd.usda.gov/programs-services/single-family-housing-guaranteed-loanprogram

USDA LINC Training and Resource Library: 

https://www.rd.usda.gov/programs-services/lenders/usda-linc-training-resource-library

Procedure Notices: https://www.rd.usda.gov/resources/directives/procedures-notices

#

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender.
Together, America Prospers

Higher Blends Infrastructure Incentive Program

Background

Biofuels are an important 

market for the United States. 

They contribute to energy 

security, reduce air pollution, 

and support rural economic 

development.

The Higher Blends 

Infrastructure Incentive 

Program (HBIIP) helps expand 

biofuel infrastructure and 

broadens the availability of 

renewable fuels such as E15, 

E85, and B20. This helps 

American families save money 

at the pump while reducing 

carbon emissions and harmful 

tailpipe pollution. Higherblend biofuels also help boost 

the availability of skilled jobs 

with good wages in rural 

communities.

Since the HBIIP’s 2020 debut, 

USDA has invested more 

than $77.8 million in projects 

expected to increase biofuels 

sales by 1.2 billion gallons 

annually.

Key Points

• USDA designed HBIIP to 

increase the availability of higher 

blends of ethanol, such as E15 

and biodiesel (B20).

• HBIIP grants support 

transportation fueling, fuel 

distribution, and home heating 

oil distribution facilities, 

lowering out-of-pocket costs 

for businesses to install or 

upgrade fuel dispensers, storage 

tanks and systems, and other 

related equipment.

• Expanding the availability of 

higher-blend biofuels gives 

customers more choices at the 

pump by offering access to 

environmentally friendly fuel with 

decreased emissions.

• About 96 percent – roughly 220 

million – of the vehicles on U.S. 

roads today are legally approved 

to use E15. Additionally, there 

are more than 22 million flex fuel 

vehicles – about eight percent of 

all vehicles – that can use ethanol 

blends up to E85. All diesel 

vehicles can operate on B20. 

For additional information, visit our 

webpage at rd.usda.gov/hbiip, or 

email us at HBIIP@usda.gov.

NOTE: Because information changes, always consult official program 

instructions or contact your local Rural Development office for help. A list 

is available at this link: https://go.usa.gov/xJHPE. You will find additional 

resources, forms, and program information at https://rd.usda.gov.

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Last Updated May 2023
#### CONANT'S ADMINISTRATOR (W. E. Chipps), Movant, v. CITIZENS STATE BANK OF WICKLIFFE, Ky., Opposed.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

April 28, 1939.

Charles Ferguson for movant.

M. C. Anderson, opposed.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal denied; judgment affirmed on authority of Quigley v. Arteburn’s Adm’r, 32 S. W. 165, 17 Ky. Law Rep. 565.
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Citizenship EducationCivicsDemocracyElementary Secondary EducationLaw Related EducationService LearningSocial CapitalSocial Studies

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
### §3392. Natural gas for essential industrial process and feedstock uses

#### (a) General rule

The Secretary of Energy shall prescribe and make effective a rule which provides that, notwithstanding any other provision of law (other than subsection (b)) and to the maximum extent practicable, no interstate pipeline may curtail deliveries of natural gas for any essential industrial process or feedstock use, unless such curtailment—

(1) does not reduce the quantity of natural gas delivered for such use below the use requirement specified in subsection (c);

(2) is necessary in order to meet the requirements of high-priority users; or

(3) is necessary in order to meet the requirements for essential agricultural uses of natural gas for which curtailment priority is established under section 3391 of this title.

#### (b) Curtailment priority applicable only if alternative fuel not available

The provisions of subsection (a) shall apply with respect to any curtailment of deliveries for any essential industrial process or feedstock use only if the Commission determines that use of a fuel (other than natural gas) is not economically practicable and that no fuel is reasonably available as an alternative for such use.

#### (c) Determination of essential industrial use requirements

The Secretary of Energy shall determine and certify to the Commission the natural gas requirements (expressed either as volumes or percentages of use) of persons (or classes thereof) for essential industrial process and feedstock uses (other than those referred to in section 3391(f)(1)(B) of this title).

#### (d) Definitions

For purposes of this section—

#### (1) Essential industrial process or feedstock use

The term "essential industrial process or feedstock use" means any use of natural gas in an industrial process or as a feedstock which the Secretary determines is essential.

#### (2) High-priority user

The term "high-priority user" has the same meaning as given such term in section 3391(f)(2) of this title.

(Pub. L. 95–621, title IV, §402, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3395.)
### §2124. Promotions; pay and allowances

An officer who is promoted under section 2121 of this title shall be entitled to the pay and allowances of the grade to which promoted from his date of rank in such grade.

(Added Pub. L. 88–130, §1(10)(C), Sept. 24, 1963, 77 Stat. 182, §274; renumbered §2124 and amended Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §§112(b), 123(b)(2), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4216, 4240.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282, §123(b)(2), substituted "section 2121" for "section 271".

Pub. L. 115–282, §112(b), renumbered section 274 of this title as this section.
§ 532.4 Inspection at official establishments; relation to other authorities. ( a ) Requirements within the scope of the Act with respect to premises, facilities, and operations of any official establishment that are in addition to or different than those made under this subchapter may not be imposed by any State or local jurisdiction except that the State or local jurisdiction may impose recordkeeping and other requirements within the scope of § 550.1 of this subchapter, if consistent with those requirements, with respect to the establishment.
( b ) Labeling, packaging, or ingredient requirements in addition to or different than those made under this subchapter, the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and Fair Packaging and Labeling Act may not be imposed by any State or local jurisdiction with respect to any fish or fish products processed at any official establishment in accordance with the requirements under this subchapter and those Acts.
#### Andrew Friedman v. Maryland Casualty Company.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
### §2219. Assistance to Consumer Product Safety Commission

Upon request, the Administrator shall assist the Consumer Product Safety Commission in the development of fire safety standards or codes for consumer products, as defined in the Consumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 2051 et seq.).

(Pub. L. 93–498, §22, Oct. 29, 1974, 88 Stat. 1549.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Consumer Product Safety Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 92–573, Oct. 27, 1972, 86 Stat. 1207, which is classified generally to chapter 47 (§2051 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2051 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of all functions, personnel, assets, components, authorities, grant programs, and liabilities of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, including the functions of the Under Secretary for Federal Emergency Management relating thereto, to the Federal Emergency Management Agency, see section 315(a)(1) of Title 6, Domestic Security.

For transfer of functions, personnel, assets, and liabilities of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, including the functions of the Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency relating thereto, to the Secretary of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see former section 313(1) and sections 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions of National Fire Prevention and Control Administration [now United States Fire Administration] and National Academy for Fire Prevention and Control generally transferred to Federal Emergency Management Agency. For further details see Transfer of Functions note set out under section 2202 of this title.
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Respondent-Appellee, *v.*Ronald Burbank, Petitioner-Appellant.

(No. 59250;

First District (1st Division)

October 21, 1974.

James J. Doherty, Public Defender, of Chicago (Terrence McQuigg and Matthew J. Beemsterboer, Assistant Public Defenders, of counsel), for appeHant.

Bernard Carey, State’s Attorney, of Chicago (Patrick T. Driscoll, Jr., and James B. Haddad, Assistant State’s Attorneys, of counsel), for the People.

PER CURIAM.

EGAN, J., took no part.
#### § 560.2 Cooperation of States in Federal programs.

Under the “Talmadge-Aiken Act” of September 28, 1962 (7 U.S.C. 450), the Administrator is authorized to utilize employees and facilities of any State in carrying out Federal functions under the FMIA, including functions relating to the inspection of fish and fish products. A cooperative program for this purpose is called a Federal-State program.
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1342

To repeal the Federal estate and gift taxes and the tax on generationskipping transfers.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 1, 1999

Mr. ALLARD introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To repeal the Federal estate and gift taxes and the tax

on generation-skipping transfers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF FEDERAL TRANSFER TAXES.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subtitle B of the Internal Rev5 enue Code of 1986 is repealed.

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The repeal made by sub7 section (a) shall apply to the estates of decedents dying,

8 and gifts and generation-skipping transfers made, after

9 the date of enactment of this Act.
2

•S 1342 IS

1 (c) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING CHANGES.—The

2 Secretary of the Treasury or the Secretary’s delegate

3 shall, as soon as practicable but in any event not later

4 than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, sub5 mit to the Committee on Ways and Means of the House

6 of Representatives and the Committee on Finance of the

7 Senate a draft of any technical and conforming changes

8 in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 which are necessary

9 to reflect throughout such Code the changes in the sub10 stantive provisions of law made by this Act.

Æ
# C_2006294EN.01004001.xml

| 2.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/40

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 27 September 2006 — Roquette Frères v Commission

(Case T-322/01) (1)

1

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Sodium gluconate - Article 81 EC - Fine - Article 15(2) of Regulation No 17 - Guidelines on the method of setting fines - Leniency notice - Equal treatment Principle ne bis in idem)

(2006/C 294/84)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Roquette Frères, SA (Lestrem, France) (represented by: O. Prost, D. Voillemot and A. Choffel, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: initially, A. Bouquet, W. Wils and A. Whelan, and subsequently A. Bouquet, W. Wils and A. Whelan, Agents, assisted by A. Condomines and J. Liygonie, lawyers)

Defendant:

Re:

First, an application for annulment of Articles 1 and 3 of Decision C(2002) 2931 final of 2 October 2001 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 81 of the EC Treaty and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (COMP/E-1/36.756 — Sodium gluconate), in that it sets the amount of the fine imposed on the applicant; second, an application for a reduction in the amount of the find; and, third, an application for repayment to the applicant of the amounts unlawfully received.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets the amount of the fine imposed on Roquette Frères SA at EUR 8 105 000; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets the amount of the fine imposed on Roquette Frères SA at EUR 8 105 000;

| 2. | Varies Decision C(2002) 2931 final of 2 October 2001 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 81 of the EC Treaty and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (COMP/E-1/36.756 — Sodium gluconate) in so far as it is inconsistent with paragraph 1 above; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Varies Decision C(2002) 2931 final of 2 October 2001 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 81 of the EC Treaty and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (COMP/E-1/36.756 — Sodium gluconate) in so far as it is inconsistent with paragraph 1 above;

| 3. | Dismisses the remainder of the application; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Dismisses the remainder of the application;

| 4. | Orders Roquette Frères SA to pay all of the costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders Roquette Frères SA to pay all of the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 68, 16.3.02.

1

---
# C_2012379EN.01003701.xml

| 8.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 379/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 379/37

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 18 October 2012 — Verstreken v Council

(Case F-16/10) (1)

1

2012/C 379/64

Language of the case: French

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 134, 22.5.2010, p. 55.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 127 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 127

    To amend the Agricultural Market Transition Act to prohibit the 
  Secretary of Agriculture from including any storage charges in the 
calculation of loan deficiency payments or loans made to producers for 
                           loan commodities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 19, 1999

 Mr. Feingold introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Agricultural Market Transition Act to prohibit the 
  Secretary of Agriculture from including any storage charges in the 
calculation of loan deficiency payments or loans made to producers for 
                           loan commodities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STORAGE CHARGES FOR LOAN COMMODITIES.

    Subtitle C of the Agricultural Market Transition Act (7 U.S.C. 7231 
et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 138. STORAGE CHARGES FOR LOAN COMMODITIES.

    ``In calculating the amount of a loan deficiency payment or loan 
made to a producer for a loan commodity under this subtitle, the 
Secretary may not include any storage charges incurred by the producer 
in connection with the loan commodity.''.
                                 <all>
```
----- Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 08/10/2010 02:33 PM

----- |------------> | From: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------| |Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | To: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------| |Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Cc: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------| |Fred Talcott/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Michael Horowitz/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Larry Sorrels/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Amy | |Lamson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Peter Nagelhout/DC/USEPA/US@EPA | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Date: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------| |08/09/2010 11:44 PM | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Subject: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------| |revised SI RICE NESHAP RIA | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------|

Cortney, Attached is the revised RIA - clean version and a redline to show the changes since the initial draft that OMB received. (See attached file: Final SI RICE RIA 8-09-10draftOMBversion3redlinestrikeout.doc)(See attached file: Final SI RICE RIA 8-09-10draftOMBversion3clean.doc) Melanie King Energy Strategies Group Sector Policies and Programs Division Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Mail Code D243-01 RTP, NC 27711 Phone: (919) 541-2469 Fax: (919) 541-5450 king.melanie@epa.gov