Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2011 / Notices 2135 

Response, Compensation, and Liability 

Act of 1980, 42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq. 

(‘‘CERCLA’’). 

The Agreement provides that EPA 

will have allowed general unsecured 

claims in the following amounts with 

respect to the following sites, all of 

which are located in Onondaga County, 

New York: (1) $636,000 in connection 

with the Lake Bottom Subsite of the 

Onondaga Lake Superfund Site, (2) 

$320,000 in connection with the Willis 

Avenue Subsite of the Onondaga Lake 

Superfund Site, (3) $27,328 in 

connection with the Crucible Plant Site, 

(4) $3,255 in connection with the Lake 

Pump Station Site, and (5) $12,956 in 

connection with the Maestri-II Site. 

Under the Agreement, EPA has agreed 

not to bring a civil action or take 

administrative action against the 

Debtors pursuant to Sections 106 and 

107(a) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9606 and 

9607(a), and Section 7003 of the 

Resource Conservation and Recovery 

Act (‘‘RCRA’’), 42 U.S.C. 6973, relating 

to the Lake Bottom Subsite and the 

Willis Avenue Subsite of the Onondaga 

Lake Superfund Site. EPA has also 

agreed not to bring a civil action or take 

administrative action against the 

Debtors pursuant to Section 107(a) of 

CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9607(a), relating to 

response costs incurred by EPA on or 

before September 30, 2010 in 

connection with the Crucible Plant Site, 

the Lake Pump Station Site, or the 

Maestri-II Site. 

The Agreement also provides that the 

liability of the Debtors to EPA, with 

respect to the Butler Mine Tunnel 

Superfund Site, located in Pittston 

Township, Pennsylvania, and the 

consent decree entered into by one of 

the Debtors in connection with that site 

(United States v. Auburn Technology, 

Inc., No. 3:CV00–1912 (M.D. Pa. Feb. 15, 

2001), will not be affected by the 

Agreement. 

Finally, the Agreement also provides 

that Honeywell will have an allowed 

general unsecured claim in the amount 

of $20,564,000 in connection with the 

Lake Bottom Subsite of the Onondaga 

Lake Superfund Site. 

For a period of 15 days from the date 

of this publication, the Department of 

Justice will receive comments relating to 

the Agreement. To be considered, 

comments must be received by the 

Department of Justice by the date that 

this 15 days from the date of this 

publication. Comments should be 

addressed to the Assistant Attorney 

General, Environment and Natural 

Resources Division, and either e-mailed 

to pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov or 

mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Washington, DC 

20044, and should refer to In re Crucible 

Materials Corp., Case No. 09–11582 

(MFW) (Bankr. D. Del.) and D.J. Ref. No. 

90–11–3–134/3. A copy of the 

comments should be sent to Donald G. 

Frankel, Senior Counsel, Department of 

Justice, Environmental Enforcement 

Section, One Gateway Center, Suite 616, 

Newton, MA 02458 or e-mailed to 

donald.frankel@usdoj.gov. 

The Agreement may be examined at 

the Office of the United States Attorney, 

District of Delaware, 1201 Market Street, 

Suite 1100, Wilmington, Delaware 

(contact Ellen Slights at 302–573–6277. 

During the public comment period, the 

Agreement may also be examined on the 

following Department of Justice Web 

site, http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ 

Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the 

Agreement may also be obtained by mail 

from the Consent Decree Library, P.O. 

Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, 

Washington, DC 20044–7611 or by 

faxing or e-mailing a request to Tonia 

Fleetwood (tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), 

fax no. (202) 514–0097, phone 

confirmation number (202) 514–1547. In 

requesting a copy of the Agreement from 

the Consent Decree Library, please 

enclose a check in the amount of $4.75 

(25 cents per page reproduction cost) 

payable to the U.S. Treasury (if the 

request is by fax or email, forward a 

check to the Consent Decree library at 

the address stated above). Commenters 

may request an opportunity for a public 

meeting, in accordance with Section 

7003(d) of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 6973(d). 

Maureen Katz, 

Assistant Section Chief, Environmental 

Enforcement Section, Environment and 

Natural Resources Division. 

[FR Doc. 2011–523 Filed 1–11–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Office of Juvenile Justice and 

Delinquency Prevention 

[OJP (OJJDP) Docket No. 1544] 

Office of Juvenile Justice and 

Delinquency Prevention Proposed Plan 

for Fiscal Year 2011 

AGENCY: Office of Juvenile Justice and 

Delinquency Prevention, Office of 

Justice Programs, Department of Justice. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed plan for 

Fiscal Year 2011. 

SUMMARY: The Office of Juvenile Justice 

and Delinquency Prevention is 

publishing this notice of its Proposed 

Plan for fiscal year (FY) 2011. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before February 28, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

electronically or view an electronic 

version of this proposed rule at http:// 

www.regulations.gov. You may also mail 

comments to Jeff Slowikowski, Acting 

Administrator, Office of Juvenile Justice 

and Delinquency Prevention, 810 

Seventh Street, NW., Washington, DC 

20531. To ensure proper handling, 

clearly reference ‘‘Proposed OJJDP 

Program Plan Comments’’ or ‘‘OJP 

Docket No. 1544’’ in the lower left hand 

corner of the envelope and on your 

correspondence. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The 

Office of Juvenile Justice and 

Delinquency Prevention at 202–307– 

5911. [This is not a toll-free number.] 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Posting of Public Comments 

Please note that all comments 

received are considered part of the 

public record and made available for 

public inspection online at http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Such information 

includes personal identifying 

information (such as name and address) 

that the commenter voluntarily submits. 

If you wish to submit personal 

identifying information (such as your 

name, address, etc.) as part of your 

comment, but do not wish for it to be 

posted online, you must include the 

phrase ‘‘PERSONAL IDENTIFYING 

INFORMATION’’ in the first paragraph 

of your comment. You also must locate 

all the personal identifying information 

you do not wish to be posted online in 

the first paragraph of your comment and 

identify what information you would 

like redacted. 

If you wish to submit confidential 

business information as part of your 

comment but do not wish for it to be 

posted online, you must include the 

phrase ‘‘CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS 

INFORMATION’’ in the first paragraph 

of your comment. You also must 

prominently identify confidential 

business information to be redacted 

within the comment. If a comment has 

so much confidential business 

information that it cannot be effectively 

redacted, all or part of that comment 

may not be posted on http:// 

www.regulations.gov. 

Personal identifying information and 

confidential business information 

identified and located as set forth above 

will be placed in the agency’s public 

docket file, but not posted online. If you 

wish to inspect the agency’s public 

docket file in person by appointment, 

please see the ‘‘For Further Information 

Contact’’ paragraph. 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

2136 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2011 / Notices 

1 In this plan, the terms ‘‘tribes’’ and ‘‘tribal 

jurisdictions’’ refer to both American Indian and 

Alaska Native communities. 

II. Preamble 

The Office of Juvenile Justice and 

Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) is a 

component of the Office of Justice 

Programs in the U.S. Department of 

Justice. Section 204 (b)(5)(A) of the 

Juvenile Justice and Delinquency 

Prevention Act of 1974, as amended, 42 

U.S.C. 5601 et seq. (JJDP Act) directs the 

OJJDP Administrator to publish for 

public comment a Proposed Plan 

describing the program activities that 

OJJDP proposes to carry out during FY 

2011 under Parts D and E of Title II of 

the JJDP Act, codified at 42 U.S.C. 5661 

et seq. and 5665 et seq. Because the 

Office’s discretionary activities extend 

beyond Parts D and E, OJJDP is seeking 

comments on a more comprehensive 

listing of the Office’s proposed 

programs. Taking into consideration 

comments received on this Proposed 

Plan, the Administrator will develop 

and publish in the Federal Register 

OJJDP’s Final Plan describing the 

particular program activities that OJJDP 

intends to fund during FY 2011. 

OJJDP acknowledges that at this time 

its FY 2011 appropriation is not yet 

final. Depending on the final 

appropriation, OJJDP may alter how its 

programs are structured and modify this 

Proposed Plan when it is published in 

final form following the public 

comment period. 

OJJDP posts on its Web site (http:// 

www.ojjdp.gov) solicitations of grant or 

cooperative agreement applications for 

competitive programs to be funded 

under the Final Plan. OJJDP notifies the 

public that these solicitations have been 

posted through issuance of JUVJUSTs 

(listserv) announcements and other 

methods of electronic notification. No 

proposals, concept papers, or other 

forms of application should be 

submitted at this time. 

Department Priorities: OJJDP has 

structured this plan to reflect the high 

priority that the Administration and the 

Department have placed on addressing 

youth violence and victimization and 

improving protections for youth 

involved with the juvenile justice 

system. The proposals presented here 

represent OJJDP’s current thinking on 

how to advance the Department’s 

priorities during this fiscal year. These 

proposals also incorporate feedback 

from OJJDP’s ongoing outreach to the 

field seeking ideas on program areas and 

the most promising approaches for those 

types of areas. The first section of this 

proposed plan contains programs that 

address priority areas that the Attorney 

General has identified. 

OJJDP’s Purpose: Congress established 

OJJDP through the JJDP Act of 1974 to 

help states and communities prevent 

and control delinquency and strengthen 

their juvenile justice systems and to 

coordinate and administer national 

policy in this area. 

Although states, American Indian/ 

Alaska Native (AI/AN) communities,1

and other localities retain primary 

responsibility for administering juvenile 

justice and preventing juvenile 

delinquency, OJJDP supports and 

supplements the efforts of public and 

private organizations at all levels 

through program funding via formula, 

block, and discretionary grants; 

administration of Congressional earmark 

programs; research; training and 

technical assistance; funding of 

demonstration projects; and 

dissemination of information. OJJDP 

also helps administer Federal policy 

related to juvenile justice and 

delinquency prevention through its 

leadership role in the Coordinating 

Council on Juvenile Justice and 

Delinquency Prevention. 

OJJDP’s Vision: OJJDP strives to be the 

recognized authority and national leader 

dedicated to the future, safety, and wellbeing of children and youth in, or at risk 

of entering, the juvenile justice system. 

OJJDP’s Mission: OJJDP provides 

national leadership, coordination, and 

resources to prevent and respond to 

juvenile delinquency and victimization 

by supporting states, tribal jurisdictions, 

and communities in their efforts to 

develop and implement effective 

coordinated prevention and 

intervention programs and improve the 

juvenile justice system so that it protects 

public safety, holds offenders 

accountable, and provides treatment 

and rehabilitation services tailored to 

the needs of juveniles and their families. 

Guiding Principles for OJJDP’s 

National Leadership: OJJDP provides 

targeted funding, sponsors research and 

demonstration programs, offers training 

and technical assistance, disseminates 

information, and uses technology to 

enhance programs and collaboration in 

exercising its national leadership. In all 

of these efforts, the following four 

principles guide OJJDP: 

1. Empower communities and engage 

youth and families. 

2. Promote evidence-based practices. 

3. Require accountability. 

4. Enhance collaboration. 

1. Empower communities and engage 

youth and families. Families and 

communities play an essential role in 

any effort to prevent delinquency and 

protect children from victimization. As 

Attorney General Holder has said: 

‘‘family connections improve public 

safety, and responsible and engaged 

parenting improve public safety.’’ This 

is especially true when fathers are 

involved and play a central role in their 

children’s development. Communities 

must reach beyond the formal systems 

of justice, social services, and law 

enforcement to tap into the wisdom and 

energies of many others—including 

business leaders, the media, 

neighborhood associations, block 

leaders, elected officials, tribal leaders, 

clergy, faith-based organizations, and 

especially families and young people 

themselves—who have a stake in 

helping local youth become productive, 

law-abiding citizens. In particular, 

OJJDP must engage families and youth 

in developing solutions to delinquency 

and victimization. Their strengths, 

experiences, and aspirations provide an 

important perspective in developing 

those solutions. 

To be effective, collaboration among 

community stakeholders must be 

grounded in up-to-date information. 

With Federal assistance that OJJDP 

provides, community members can 

partner to gather data, assess local 

conditions, and make decisions to 

ensure resources are targeted for 

maximum impact. 

2. Promote evidence-based practices. 

To make the best use of public 

resources, OJJDP must identify what 

works in delinquency prevention and 

juvenile justice. OJJDP is the only 

Federal agency with a specific mission 

to develop and disseminate knowledge 

about what works in this field. Drawing 

on this knowledge, OJJDP helps 

communities replicate proven programs 

and improve their existing programs. 

OJJDP helps communities match 

program models to their specific needs 

and supports interventions that respond 

to the developmental, cultural, and 

gender needs of the youth and families 

they will serve. 

3. Require accountability. OJJDP 

requires the national, state, tribal, and 

local entities whose programs OJJDP 

supports to explain how they use 

program resources, determine and 

report on how effective the programs are 

in alleviating the problems they are 

intended to address, and propose plans 

for remediation of performance that 

does not meet standards. OJJDP has 

established mandatory performance 

measures for all its programs and 

reports on those measures to the Office 

of Management and Budget. OJJDP 

requires its grantees and applicants to 

report on these performance measures, 

set up systems to gather the data 

necessary to monitor those performance 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2011 / Notices 2137 

measures, and use this information to 

continuously assess progress and finetune the programs. 

4. Enhance collaboration. Juvenile 

justice agencies and programs are just 

one part of a larger set of systems that 

encompasses the many agencies and 

programs that work with at-risk youth 

and their families. For delinquency 

prevention and child protection efforts 

to be effective, they must be coordinated 

at the local, tribal, State, and Federal 

levels with law enforcement, social 

services, child welfare, public health, 

mental health, school, and other 

systems that address family 

strengthening and youth development. 

One way to achieve this coordination is 

to establish broad-based coalitions to 

create consensus on service priorities 

and to build support for a coordinated 

approach. With this consensus as a 

foundation, participating agencies and 

departments can then build mechanisms 

to link service providers at the program 

level—including procedures for sharing 

information across systems. 

OJJDP took its guidance in the 

development of this proposed plan from 

the priorities that the Attorney General 

has set forth for the Department. At the 

same time, OJJDP drew upon its 

Strategic Plan for 2009–2011. The four 

primary goals at the heart of OJJDP’s 

Strategic Plan echo the Attorney 

General’s priorities. Those goals are: 

Prevent and respond to delinquency, 

strengthen the juvenile justice system, 

prevent and reduce the victimization of 

children, and create safer 

neighborhoods by preventing and 

reducing youth violence. OJJDP is 

currently updating its Strategic Plan. 

III. OJJDP Proposed Program Plan for 

Fiscal Year 2011 

Each year OJJDP receives formula and 

block grant funding as well as 

discretionary funds for certain program 

areas. Based on the 2010 appropriation 

and the 2011 presidential budget, OJJDP 

offers the following 2011 Proposed Plan 

for consideration and comment. 

Programs are organized according to the 

Department priorities and traditional 

OJJDP focus areas. 

Department and OJJDP Priorities 

OJJDP administers grant programs 

authorized by the JJDP Act of 1974, as 

amended. OJJDP also administers 

programs under other legislative 

authority and through partnerships with 

other Federal agencies. In keeping with 

OJJDP’s mission, these programs are 

designed to help strengthen the juvenile 

justice system, prevent juvenile 

delinquency and violence, and protect 

and safeguard the nation’s youth. The 

Obama Administration and the Attorney 

General have identified children’s 

exposure to violence, gang violence, and 

community violence as focus areas for 

the Department. 

The Attorney General’s Initiative on 

Children Exposed to Violence Program: 

Phase II 

On September 23, 2010, Attorney 

General Holder launched Defending 

Childhood, an initiative that harnesses 

resources from across the Department of 

Justice to prevent children’s exposure to 

violence; mitigate the negative impact of 

that exposure; and develop knowledge 

and spread awareness about the issue. 

The Attorney General’s Initiative on 

Children Exposed to Violence is the 

programmatic expression of Defending 

Childhood. Following an initial 

planning year, DOJ proposes to award 

supplemental funds to the original eight 

sites to implement activities to prevent 

and reduce the impact of children’s 

exposure to violence in their homes, 

schools, and communities. 

Subsequently, DOJ will select four 

communities to receive substantial 

support through an invitation-only 

competition. The remaining four sites 

will receive supplemental funding for 

specific program services under DOJ 

guidelines. OJJDP will conduct process 

and outcome evaluations of the 

initiative. 

Community-Based Violence Prevention 

Program 

OJJDP proposes to fund eight new 

sites to replicate intervention programs, 

such as the Boston Gun Project, the 

Richmond Comprehensive Homicide 

Initiative, and the Chicago CeaseFire 

model, to reduce violence in targeted 

communities. Applicants must focus 

their proposed programs on the highrisk activities and behaviors of a small 

number of carefully selected members of 

the community who are likely to be 

involved in gun violence in the 

immediate future. The intervention with 

this target population should include 

improved coordination of existing 

resources and activities that support 

multiple, complementary anti-violence 

strategies. An additional evaluation 

grant (continuation) will be made to 

ensure data from the new sites are 

included in the national evaluation. 

Comprehensive Community Anti-Gang 

Strategies and Programs 

OJJDP proposes to fund community 

partnerships of Federal, State, and local 

entities implementing primary 

prevention, secondary prevention, gang 

intervention, and targeted gang 

enforcement anti-gang programs. 

Awards will support coordination of 

community-based anti-gang initiatives 

that involve law enforcement, schools, 

social services, faith- and communitybased organizations, and businesses as 

essential partners. Successful applicants 

will demonstrate that they are 

implementing community-based antigang activities consistent with OJJDP’s 

Comprehensive Gang Model. 

Continuations 

In FY 2011, OJJDP will continue to 

support: 

• Safe Start Promising Approaches 

Project 

• Children’s Exposure to Violence 

Fellowship 

• National Survey of Children 

Exposed to Violence 

• Youth Gang Prevention and 

Intervention Program 

Tribal Youth 

Since 1998, Congress has 

appropriated funding to support 

programs addressing tribal youth. OJJDP 

administers most of its tribal initiatives 

through the Tribal Youth Program 

(TYP). These programs fund initiatives, 

training and technical assistance, and 

research and evaluation projects to 

improve juvenile justice systems and 

delinquency prevention efforts among 

federally recognized American Indian 

and Alaska Native (AI/AN) tribes. Since 

1999, 10 percent of the TYP 

appropriation has been used for 

research and evaluation activities and 2 

percent has been used for training and 

technical assistance. 

U.S. Department of Justice Coordinated 

Tribal Assistance 

In response to concerns that tribes 

voiced during recent public listening 

sessions, DOJ developed the 

Coordinated Tribal Assistance 

Solicitation (CTAS) that combines all of 

its existing competitive tribal 

solicitations into one document. The 

CTAS solicitation is posted on the 

Office of Justice Programs (OJP) Web 

site (http://www.ojp.gov). The following 

are the OJJDP proposed programs within 

the CTAS: 

• Tribal Youth Program supports and 

enhances tribal efforts to prevent and 

control delinquency and improve their 

juvenile justice systems. Grantees 

develop and implement delinquency 

prevention programs, interventions for 

court-involved youth, improvements to 

their juvenile justice systems, alcohol 

and substance abuse prevention 

programs, and emotional/behavioral 

program services. 

• Tribal Juvenile Accountability 

Discretionary Grants (TJADG) Program 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

2138 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2011 / Notices 

receives a separate allocation through 

the Juvenile Accountability Block 

Grants Program to provide funds to 

federally recognized tribes to combat 

delinquency and improve the quality of 

life in AI/AN communities. OJJDP 

awards Tribal JADG program grants to 

AI/AN communities to promote 

accountability-based reform and 

strengthen the tribal juvenile justice 

system by addressing 1 or more of the 

17 tribal JADG program purpose areas. 

OJJDP requires applicants to submit a 

plan for evaluating their projects. 

• OJJDP intends to support Tribal 

Youth Demonstration Programs that 

address gaps in programs and services 

for tribal youth. Services include risk 

and needs assessments, educational and 

vocational programs, mental health 

services, substance abuse programs, 

family strengthening, recreational 

activities, and extended reentry 

aftercare to help offenders successfully 

reintegrate into the tribal community. 

Empowering Alaska Native Youth 

Initiative 

OJJDP intends to support Alaska 

Native villages as they implement 

programs and services to prevent and 

control delinquency and improve their 

juvenile justice systems. The villages 

will develop and implement 

delinquency prevention programs, 

interventions for court-involved youth, 

improvements to their juvenile justice 

systems, alcohol and substance abuse 

prevention programs, and emotional/ 

behavioral program services. 

Technical Assistance for Tribal Law 

Enforcement To Reduce Children’s 

Exploitation Crimes 

OJJDP intends to support programs 

that decrease children’s risk of 

exploitation and victimization in tribal 

communities and expand the goals and 

activities of these programs to protect 

children. This initiative will support the 

development and implementation of 

targeted technical assistance to enhance 

the ability of tribal communities to 

respond to child exploitation, including 

runaway children and victims of child 

trafficking or commercial sexual 

exploitation. 

Tribal Youth Gang Assessment and 

Demonstration Program 

OJJDP proposes to fund an assessment 

of the gang problem in tribal 

communities that will inform the 

development of a tribal youth gang 

prevention and intervention 

demonstration program. The last 

attempt to accurately depict such youth 

gang issues was conducted nearly 10 

years ago, and OJJDP feels that the 

issues facing tribal communities have 

changed significantly since that time. 

Tribal Youth Field-Initiated Research 

and Evaluation Programs 

OJJDP proposes to fund field-initiated 

studies to further what is understood 

regarding the experiences, strengths, 

and needs of tribal youth, their families, 

and communities and what works to 

reduce their risks for delinquency and 

victimization. Accordingly, OJJDP will 

seek applications addressing a broad 

range of research topics, such as the 

identification of risk factors for 

delinquent behavior and substance 

abuse, pathways to delinquency and 

desistance, and victimization 

experiences among tribal youth. 

Tribal Youth National Mentoring 

Program 

OJJDP proposes to support the 

development, maturation, and 

expansion of mentoring services for 

tribal youth on tribal reservations that 

are underserved due to location, 

shortage of mentors, emotional or 

behavioral challenges of the targeted 

population, or other situations. Grantees 

will assess tribal needs, develop plans, 

and implement and monitor mentoring 

activities in multiple states that have 

tribal reservations. 

Continuation 

In FY 2011, OJJDP will continue to 

support: 

• Child Protection Programs in Tribal 

Communities 

Juvenile Justice System Reform 

OJJDP recognizes the need for states to 

have effective and efficient juvenile 

justice systems and for the Office to 

assist them in identifying and 

implementing promising and evidencebased practices. Reforming juvenile 

justice and improving systems across 

the country is a priority for OJJDP. 

Components of the juvenile justice 

system that OJJDP will focus on in 2011 

include detention and corrections 

reform, and youth transitioning back to 

their communities from a detention or 

corrections facility. 

Protection and Advocacy Juvenile 

Justice Monitoring Project 

OJJDP proposes to support a project to 

provide independent monitoring in 

juvenile justice facilities to identify and 

address dangerous and unsafe 

conditions of confinement. In addition, 

this project will generate information to 

evaluate the effectiveness of an external 

oversight mechanism to improve 

conditions of confinement in juvenile 

justice facilities. The proposed project 

would focus on conditions and practices 

affecting any confined youth and 

specifically those affecting youth with 

health, physical, sensory, and cognitive 

or intellectual disabilities and youth 

with mental health and behavioral 

health disorders. 

Second Chance Act Adult and Juvenile 

Offender Reentry Demonstration 

Projects 

OJJDP, in collaboration with the 

Bureau of Justice Assistance, will 

support additional demonstration 

projects under the Second Chance Act 

Youth Offender Reentry Initiative, a 

comprehensive response to the 

increasing number of people who are 

released from prison, jail, and juvenile 

facilities each year and are returning to 

their communities. The goal of this 

initiative is to reduce the rate of 

recidivism for offenders released from a 

juvenile residential facility and increase 

public safety. Demonstration projects 

provide necessary services to youth 

while in confinement and following 

their release into the community. The 

initiative will focus on addressing the 

unique needs of girls reentering their 

communities. 

Continuations 

In FY 2011, OJJDP will continue to 

support; 

• Juvenile Indigent Defense National 

Clearinghouse 

• National Training and Technical 

Assistance Center for Youth in Custody 

• Juvenile Detention Alternatives 

Initiative 

• The National Girls Institute 

Research, Evaluation, and Data 

Collection 

OJJDP supports and promotes 

research, vigorous and informative 

evaluations of demonstration programs, 

and collection and analysis of statistical 

data. The goal of these activities is to 

generate credible and useful information 

to improve decisionmaking in the 

juvenile justice system. OJJDP sponsors 

research that has the greatest potential 

to improve the nation’s understanding 

of juvenile delinquency and 

victimization and of ways to develop 

effective prevention and intervention 

programs to respond to it. 

Assessment of Youth Gangs in Juvenile 

Detention and Correctional Facilities 

OJJDP proposes to fund an assessment 

of the nature and scope of youth gangs 

in juvenile detention and correctional 

facilities. OJJDP will use information 

garnered from this assessment to inform 

the development of programs, policies, 

and practice to better serve incarcerated 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2011 / Notices 2139 

youth and ensure safety and security for 

detainees and staff in residential 

facilities. 

Child Protection Research Program 

OJJDP proposes to fund field-initiated 

research and evaluation projects on 

crimes against children and juveniles, 

primarily on issues of exploitation and 

abuse. These projects will produce 

information that will assist Federal, 

State, and local law enforcement and 

prosecutors involved with crimes 

against children cases, policymakers, 

and professionals who care for and 

educate children and youth. OJJDP will 

consider applications proposing 

research in other areas that will fill a 

critical gap in the field’s knowledge and 

practice. 

Evaluation of Second Chance Act 

Juvenile Mentoring Initiative 

OJJDP expects to conduct a 

comprehensive process and rigorous 

impact evaluation of the Second Chance 

Act Juvenile Mentoring Initiative to 

determine the effectiveness of 

combining mentoring with other reentry 

services for participating juvenile 

offenders during their confinement, 

through their transition back to the 

community, and following release. 

OJJDP will select a national evaluator to 

assess the implementation of these 

programs and their impact on service 

delivery and key outcomes for 

participating youth, including 

recidivism. 

Mentoring Research Best Practices 

Program 

OJJDP proposes to fund a program of 

research that seeks to enhance the 

understanding of mentoring as a 

prevention strategy for youth at risk of 

involvement or already involved in the 

juvenile justice system. While 

mentoring appears to be a promising 

intervention for youth, more evaluation 

work is needed to further highlight the 

components of a mentoring program 

that are most effective and how effective 

mentoring is as a delinquency 

prevention/intervention technique. 

Youth Gang Research Initiative 

OJJDP proposes to fund research on 

gangs that provides current information 

on the nature and scope of the gang 

problem in the United States, examines 

programs and strategies that 

communities have implemented to 

prevent and intervene in gang activity, 

and identifies emerging trends in gang 

prevention and intervention programs. 

Further research and examination is 

needed to develop a better 

understanding of the factors that lead to 

gang involvement, the nature and scope 

of different types of gangs, and the most 

effective strategies, programs, and 

practices to prevent and intervene with 

gang-involved youth. 

Secondary Data Analysis Program 

OJJDP intends to make several 

competitive awards to encourage 

secondary analysis of one or more of 

several datasets that the Office has 

archived to answer research questions 

that impact policy and practice in 

juvenile justice. Since the mid-1970s, 

OJJDP has supported a series of data 

collection programs to capture accurate 

and detailed information on youth 

offenders in residential placement and 

the facilities that hold them. OJJDP will 

make these datasets available to 

researchers. 

Field-Initiated Research and Evaluation 

Program 

OJJDP intends to support multiple 

grant awards for research and 

evaluations of programs and initiatives 

that focus on the juvenile justice 

system’s response to delinquency and 

system improvement. The goal of the 

research questions posed will be to 

inform policy and lead to 

recommendations for juvenile justice 

system improvement. 

National Juvenile Probation Census 

Project 

OJJDP proposes to support the next 

round of its Census of Juveniles on 

Probation, which describes youth under 

justice supervision and the services they 

receive. The census provides critical 

data on the characteristics of youth on 

probation, the nature of their offenses, 

and how they are served. The 

significance of such information is 

evident when one considers that the 

number of youth on probation is 

roughly five times that of the population 

of youth in custody. 

Evaluations of Girls’ Delinquency 

Programs 

OJJDP intends to support evaluations 

that will measure the effectiveness of 

delinquency prevention, intervention, 

and/or treatment programs to prevent 

and reduce girls’ risk behavior and 

offending. Over the past two decades, 

the number of girls entering the juvenile 

justice system has dramatically 

increased. This trend raised a number of 

questions for OJJDP, including whether 

this reflected an increase in girls’ 

delinquency or changes in society’s 

responses to girls’ behavior. OJJDP’s 

Girls Study Group recently completed a 

review of evaluations of girls’ 

delinquency programs and found that 

most programs have not been evaluated, 

thereby limiting knowledge about the 

most appropriate and effective programs 

for girls. 

Continuations 

In FY 2011, OJJDP will continue to 

support: 

• National Juvenile Justice Evaluation 

Center 

• National Juvenile Justice Data 

Analysis Program 

• National Juvenile Justice Data 

Collection Program 

Substance Abuse and Treatment 

OJJDP, often in partnership with other 

Federal agencies and private 

organizations, develops programs, 

research, or other initiatives to address 

juvenile use and abuse of illegal, 

prescription, and nonprescription drugs 

and alcohol. OJJDP’s substance abuse 

efforts include control, prevention, and 

treatment programs. 

Best Practices for Juvenile Drug Courts 

and Adolescent Treatment 

OJJDP proposes to fund an initiative 

in partnership with the Department of 

Health and Human Services’ Center for 

Substance Abuse Treatment to identify 

best practices for merging juvenile drug 

courts and adolescent treatment. This 

initiative will also develop and 

implement training for juvenile drug 

courts on models of adolescent 

treatment that support the drug court. 

Family Drug Court Programs 

OJJDP intends to implement and 

enhance family drug courts that serve 

substance-abusing adults who are 

involved in the family dependency 

court system as a result of child abuse 

and neglect issues. Grantees must 

provide services to the children of the 

parents in the program as well as to the 

parents. The Center for Children and 

Family Futures will provide training 

and technical assistance to family drug 

courts. 

Enforcing Underage Drinking Laws 

Program 

The Enforcing Underage Drinking 

Laws (EUDL) Program supports states’ 

efforts to reduce drinking by juveniles 

through its four components: Block 

grants to the 50 States, the 5 territories, 

and the District of Columbia; 

discretionary grants; technical 

assistance; and research and evaluation. 

Under the block grant component, each 

state, the District of Columbia, and the 

territories receive approximately 

$360,000 annually to support law 

enforcement activities, media 

campaigns, and coalition building. The 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

2140 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2011 / Notices 

EUDL discretionary grant component 

supports several diverse initiatives to 

help communities develop promising 

approaches to address underage 

drinking. EUDL training and technical 

assistance supports communities and 

states in their efforts to enforce 

underage drinking laws. EUDL funds 

and Federal partnerships also support 

evaluations of community initiatives 

within the EUDL discretionary grant 

component. 

Enforcing Underage Drinking Laws 

Assessment, Strategic Planning, and 

Implementation Initiative 

OJJDP intends to support this 

discretionary component of the 

Enforcing Underage Drinking Laws 

program, in which states will 

implement an assessment and strategic 

planning process to develop targeted, 

effective activities to reduce underage 

access to and consumption of alcohol. 

Grantees will assess local conditions 

and design a long-term strategic plan; 

implement selected and approved 

actions of that plan; collect, analyze, 

and report data; and evaluate how the 

state responded to the 

recommendations, crafted its strategic 

plan, and implemented portions of the 

plan with the remaining funds. 

Continuations 

In FY 2011, OJJDP will continue to 

support: 

• Juvenile Drug Court Mentoring 

Programs 

• Juvenile Drug Court Programs 

Mentoring 

OJJDP supports mentoring programs 

for youth at risk of failing in school, 

dropping out of school, or becoming 

involved in delinquent behavior, 

including gang activity and substance 

abuse. The goals of the programs are to 

reduce juvenile delinquency and gang 

participation, improve academic 

performance, and reduce the school 

dropout rate. Mentoring funds support 

mentoring programs that provide 

general guidance and support; promote 

personal and social responsibility; 

increase participation in education; 

support juvenile offenders returning to 

their communities after confinement in 

a residential facility; discourage use of 

illegal drugs and firearms; discourage 

involvement in gangs, violence, and 

other delinquent activity; and encourage 

participation in community service 

activities. OJJDP will also sponsor 

several research projects that will 

evaluate mentoring programs or 

approaches and the effectiveness of 

specific mentoring practices. 

Mentoring Commercial Child Sexual 

Exploitation Victim Service Agencies 

OJJDP proposes to support the 

development and enhancement of the 

mentoring capacity of community 

organizations that provide direct 

services to children who are sexually 

exploited for commercial purposes. 

Community service programs that build 

or enhance mentoring programs for 

these high-risk youth and provide other 

appropriate support services can 

empower girls and boys to exit the 

commercial sex industry and move past 

their involvement with the justice 

system and their experiences with 

victimization. Such programs should be 

led by a local community collaborative 

that is designed to address local needs 

and use local resources. 

Mentoring for Youth With Disabilities 

OJJDP proposes to fund mentoring 

programs and strategies that support atrisk youth with disabilities to prevent 

them from engaging in risky behaviors 

such as substance abuse and criminal 

activity. OJJDP anticipates coordinating 

this initiative with the U.S. Departments 

of Education and Health and Human 

Services. 

Second Chance Act Juvenile Mentoring 

Initiative 

OJJDP intends to provide grants for 

mentoring and other transitional 

services to reintegrate juvenile offenders 

into their communities. The grants will 

be used to mentor juvenile offenders 

during confinement, through transition 

back to the community, and following 

release; to provide transitional services 

to assist them in their reintegration into 

the community; and to support training 

in offender and victims issues. The 

initiative’s goals are to reduce 

recidivism among juvenile ex-offenders, 

enhance community safety, and 

enhance the capacity of local 

partnerships to address the needs of 

juvenile ex-offenders returning to their 

communities. 

National and Multi-State Mentoring 

Programs 

OJJDP expects to support national 

organizations and organizations with 

mentoring programs in at least five 

states to enhance or expand mentoring 

services to high-risk populations that 

are underserved due to location; 

shortage of mentors; special physical or 

mental challenges of the targeted 

population; youth with a parent in the 

military, including a deployed parent; 

or other analogous situations that the 

community in need of mentoring 

services identifies. 

Strategic Enhancement to Mentoring 

Programs for Comprehensive 

Delinquency Prevention Strategies 

OJJDP proposes to support the 

enhancement of existing mentoring 

programs and strategies as part of a 

comprehensive, integrated strategy for 

delinquency prevention. The 

enhancements include involving the 

parents in activities or services, 

providing structured activities and 

programs for the mentoring matches, 

and developing and implementing 

ongoing training and support for 

mentors. 

Afterschool Arts Programs for At-Risk 

Youth 

OJJDP proposes to fund afterschool 

arts programs that respond to the needs 

of at-risk youth who, research has 

shown, are at greatest risk of being a 

victim of a violent act or committing a 

crime during the afterschool hours of 

3 p.m. to 7 p.m. These programs help 

reduce risk factors that increase the 

chances a youth will develop behavior 

problems that may lead to delinquency, 

crime, and violence. 

Continuation 

In FY 2011, OJJDP will continue to 

support: 

• Mentoring for Safe Schools/Healthy 

Students Initiatives 

Child Victimization 

Since its inception, OJJDP has 

consistently strived to safeguard 

children from victimization by 

supporting research, training, and 

community programs that emphasize 

prevention and early intervention. A 

commitment to children’s safety is 

written into the Office’s legislative 

mandate, which includes the JJDP Act of 

1974, the Missing Children’s Assistance 

Act of 1984, and the Victims of Child 

Abuse Act of 1990. OJJDP continues to 

improve the responses of the justice 

system and related systems, increase 

public awareness, and promote model 

programs for addressing child 

victimization in states and communities 

across the country. 

Children’s Advocacy Centers 

OJJDP intends to continue funding for 

programs that improve the coordinated 

investigation and prosecution of child 

abuse cases. These programs include a 

national subgrant program for local 

children’s advocacy centers, a 

membership and accreditation program, 

regional children’s advocacy centers, 

and specialized technical assistance and 

training programs for child abuse 

professionals and prosecutors. Local 

children’s advocacy centers bring 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2011 / Notices 2141 

together multidisciplinary teams of 

professionals to coordinate the 

investigation, treatment, and 

prosecution of child abuse cases. 

Court Appointed Special Advocates 

Programs 

OJJDP intends to continue funding for 

Court Appointed Special Advocates 

(CASA) programs that provide children 

in the foster care system or at risk of 

entering the dependency system with 

high-quality, timely, effective, and 

sensitive representation before the 

court. CASA programs train and support 

volunteers who advocate for the best 

interests of the child in dependency 

proceedings. OJJDP funds a national 

CASA training and technical assistance 

provider and a national membership 

and accreditation organization to 

support state and local CASA 

organizations’ efforts to recruit 

volunteer advocates, including minority 

volunteers, and to provide training and 

technical assistance to these 

organizations and to stakeholders in the 

child welfare system. 

Prevention of Hate Crimes Against 

Youth 

OJJDP proposes to fund a program for 

individual public and private schools, 

school consortia, or school systems that 

would use an evidence-based approach 

to address youth hate crimes. It will 

target middle and high school students, 

teachers, administrators, and school 

resource officers in those schools. The 

program will educate students about the 

harm of prejudice and instill an 

appreciation of diversity, train teachers 

and school administrators to identify 

and respond to incidents of hate crime, 

and train law enforcement officers 

(school resource officers) in the 

investigation and prosecution of 

incidents of hate crimes involving 

youth. 

Child Exploitation 

The increasing number of children 

and teens using the Internet, the 

proliferation of child pornography, and 

the increasing number of sexual 

predators who use the Internet and 

other electronic media to prey on 

children present both a significant 

threat to the health and safety of young 

people and a formidable challenge for 

law enforcement. OJJDP took the lead 

early on in addressing this problem. 

More than a decade ago, the Office 

established the Internet Crimes Against 

Children Task Force program. 

Internet Crimes Against Children 

Program 

OJJDP expects to continue funding to 

support the operations of the 61 Internet 

Crimes Against Children (ICAC) task 

forces. The ICAC Task Force program 

helps state and local law enforcement 

agencies develop an effective response 

to sexual predators who prey upon 

juveniles via the Internet and other 

electronic devices and child 

pornography cases. This program 

encompasses forensic and investigative 

components, training and technical 

assistance, victim services, and 

community education. 

ICAC Commercial Child Sexual 

Exploitation 

OJJDP intends to support select law 

enforcement agencies in their 

development of strategies to protect 

children from commercial sexual 

exploitation. Grantees will improve 

training and coordination activities, 

develop policies and procedures to 

identify child victims of commercial 

sexual exploitation, investigate and 

prosecute cases against adults who 

sexually exploit children for 

commercial purposes, and provide 

essential services to victims, including 

cases where technology is used to 

facilitate the exploitation of the victim. 

ICAC Deconfliction System 

OJJDP proposes to fund an ICAC 

Deconfliction System (IDS) to allow 

OJJDP-credentialed users, including 

Federal, State, local, and tribal agencies 

and ICAC task forces investigating and 

prosecuting child exploitation to 

contribute and access data for use in 

resolving case conflicts. A governmental 

agency or a credentialed law 

enforcement agency will host the 

system. Also, IDS will permit the realtime analysis of data to facilitate 

identification of targets and to estimate 

the size of the law enforcement effort to 

address these crimes. 

In addition, OJJDP intends to support 

related ICAC activities and programs, 

including: 

• Designing and implementing the 

2011 ICAC-Project Safe Childhood 

National Training Conference. 

• Research on Internet and other 

technology-facilitated crimes against 

children. 

• Training for ICAC officers, 

prosecutors, judges, and other 

stakeholders. 

• Technical assistance to support 

implementation of the ICAC program. 

Continuation 

In FY 2011, OJJDP will continue to 

support: 

• Missing and Exploited Children 

Training and Technical Assistance 

Program 

Juvenile Justice System Improvement 

OJJDP works to improve the 

effectiveness and efficiency of the 

juvenile justice system. A major 

component of these efforts is the 

provision of training and technical 

assistance (TTA) resources that address 

the needs of juvenile justice 

practitioners and support state and local 

efforts to build capacity and expand the 

use of evidence-based practices. 

Training and technical assistance is 

the planning, development, delivery, 

and evaluation of activities to achieve 

specific learning objectives, resolve 

problems, and foster the application of 

innovative approaches to juvenile 

delinquency and victimization. OJJDP 

has developed a network of providers to 

deliver targeted training and technical 

assistance to policymakers and 

practitioners. 

National Delinquency Court 

Improvement Program 

OJJDP intends to support a training 

and technical assistance program to 

improve the operations of the nation’s 

juvenile delinquency courts. Under this 

program, OJJDP will produce guidelines 

to improve delinquency courts and 

standards for the representation of 

juveniles in status offense and 

delinquency cases, promote alternatives 

to detention and evidence-based 

programs to prevent and intervene in 

delinquency, produce guidelines for 

dealing with youth under the 

jurisdiction of several systems, and 

promote adherence to the core 

principles of the JJDP Act of 1974, as 

amended. 

National Gang Center 

OJJDP proposes to fund, in 

partnership with the Bureau of Justice 

Assistance, a National Gang Center to 

provide training and technical 

assistance to law enforcement agencies 

and communities on gang prevention 

and intervention programs and 

strategies. The National Gang Center 

will also administer the annual National 

Youth Gang Survey and disseminate 

current research and practice on gang 

prevention, intervention, and 

suppression strategies and programs. 

Model Programs Guide 

OJJDP expects to fund a program to 

maintain and expand the databases that 

make up OJJDP’s Model Programs 

Guide. The award recipient will actively 

identify, review, and assess new 

programs; add new programs that meet 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

2142 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 8 / Wednesday, January 12, 2011 / Notices 

1The rule would also apply for purposes of the 

prohibited transaction provisions contained in 

section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code. 

the evaluation criteria, their 

descriptions, and performance 

indicators; and develop, maintain, and 

expand subject-specific databases 

including, but not limited to, the 

disproportionate minority contact and 

deinstitutionalization of status offenders 

best practices databases. Moreover, 

OJJDP is looking to improve technical 

capacity, expand and refine the 

database, and, generally, assure ease, 

speed, and precision in searching the 

database. 

National Training and Technical 

Assistance Center for Truancy 

Prevention and Intervention 

OJJDP intends to fund a National 

Training and Technical Assistance 

Center for Truancy Prevention and 

Intervention. The center will 

disseminate information regarding what 

works to prevent and intervene with 

school truancy and dropout problems 

and promote the use of evidence-based 

practices through training, technical 

assistance, and resources. 

State Relations and Assistance 

Division’s Training and Technical 

Assistance Program 

OJJDP proposes to award a 

cooperative agreement to an 

organization that will provide training 

and technical assistance to national, 

state, and local-level grantees and nongrantees. OJJDP expects that this 

training and technical assistance will 

assist them in planning, establishing, 

operating, coordinating, and evaluating 

delinquency prevention and juvenile 

justice systems improvement projects. 

Additionally, the selected organization 

will coordinate the State Relations and 

Assistance Division’s national training 

conferences. 

Continuations 

In FY 2011, OJJDP will continue to 

support: 

• Child Abuse Training for Judicial 

and Court Personnel 

• Engaging Law Enforcement To 

Reduce Juvenile Crime, Victimization, 

and Delinquency 

• State Advisory Group Training and 

Technical Assistance Project 

Fellowships 

OJJDP’s fellowship program is 

designed to enhance the Office’s efforts 

to develop and improve innovative 

programs that serve children, youth, and 

families. A secondary goal is to provide 

practitioners an opportunity to work 

closely with career and political Federal 

staff, contractors, grantees, and other 

public and private organizations in 

Washington, DC, and across the country. 

The fellow will provide direct 

operational assistance to OJJDP staff 

through assessment and capacity 

building, design and development of 

innovative initiatives and training 

programs, resource development, 

research and evaluation, policy 

development, and outreach and 

awareness. The fellow will also develop 

articles for publication and other 

products on specific topics. 

Concentration of Federal Efforts 

Fellowship 

OJJDP proposes to fund a fellow in the 

Concentration of Federal Efforts 

program for 2 years to strengthen the 

Office’s cross-agency partnership efforts. 

Currently, OJJDP staff and leadership 

participate in dozens of interagency 

efforts. The fellow will build on related 

ongoing work of other Federal agencies, 

develop new cross-agency partnerships 

and initiatives, identify and assess 

opportunities for cross-agency 

partnerships, and track the impact of 

existing partnership efforts. 

Visiting Research Fellowship Program 

OJJDP proposes funding for a visiting 

research fellowship to identify 

evidence-based programs to facilitate 

the development or enhancement of 

new and innovative programs. Through 

the program, fellows will investigate 

new approaches to address existing 

problems in juvenile justice in 

conjunction with OJJDP’s ongoing 

program of research into juvenile justice 

and delinquency prevention issues. 

General 

Support for Conferences on Juvenile 

Justice 

OJJDP plans to support conferences 

that address juvenile justice and the 

prevention of delinquency. This support 

would provide community prevention 

leaders, treatment professionals, 

juvenile justice officials, researchers, 

and practitioners with information on 

best practices and research-based 

models to support state, local 

government, and community efforts to 

prevent juvenile delinquency. 

Dated: January 7, 2011. 

Jeff Slowikowski, 

Acting Administrator, Office of Juvenile 

Justice and Delinquency Prevention. 

[FR Doc. 2011–548 Filed 1–11–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–18–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employee Benefits Security 

Administration 

Hearing on Definition of ‘‘Fiduciary’’ 

AGENCY: Employee Benefits Security 

Administration, Labor. 

ACTION: Notice of hearing and extension 

of comment period. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the Employee Benefits Security 

Administration will hold a hearing to 

consider issues attendant to adopting a 

regulation defining when a person is 

considered to be a ‘‘fiduciary’’ by reason 

of giving investment advice to an 

employee benefit plan or to a plan’s 

participants and beneficiaries. 

DATES: The hearing will be held on 

March 1, 2011 and, if necessary, March 

2, 2011, beginning at 9 a.m., EST. 

ADDRESSES: The hearing will be held at 

the U.S. Department of Labor, 200 

Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 

DC 20210. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred 

Wong or Luisa Grillo-Chope, Office of 

Regulations and Interpretations, 

Employee Benefits Security 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Labor, at (202) 693–8500. This is not a 

toll-free number. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Employee Benefits Security 

Administration (EBSA) published in the 

Federal Register on October 22, 2010, 

(75 FR 65263), a proposed rule under 

the Employee Retirement Income 

Security Act (ERISA) that, upon 

adoption, more broadly defines the 

circumstances under which a person is 

considered a ‘‘fiduciary’’ by reason of 

giving investment advice to an 

employee benefit plan or to a plan’s 

participants.1 The proposal amends a 

thirty-five year old rule that may 

inappropriately limit the types of 

investment advice relationships that 

give rise to fiduciary duties on the part 

of the investment advisor. The current 

regulation significantly narrows the 

plain language of section 3(21)(A)(ii) of 

the Employee Retirement Income 

Security Act (ERISA) by creating a 5- 

part test that must be satisfied in order 

for a person to be considered a fiduciary 

by reason of giving investment advice. 

The changes set forth in the proposed 

regulation are intended to more closely 

conform such determinations to the 

statutory definition, as well as take into 

account the significant changes in both 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES