alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF SILVER CINEMAS, INTERNATIONAL,
INC. AS OF MARCH 31, 2000, AND THE RELATED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       2,846,049
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,856,201
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    526,470
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,228,720
<PP&E>                                      79,812,400
<DEPRECIATION>                            (14,722,374)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             130,807,118
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      141,702,013
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 36,105,036
<COMMON>                                         1,420
<OTHER-SE>                                (16,414,246)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               130,807,118
<SALES>                                     24,751,514
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            24,751,514
<CGS>                                       21,402,795
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               32,007,157
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               487,806
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,635,807
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (11,379,256)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (11,379,256)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
# C_2011204EN.01002303.xml

| 9.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 204/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 204/23

---

Order of the General Court of 23 May 2011 — Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej v Commission

(Case T-226/10) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Representation by lawyers who are not third parties - Inadmissibility)

2011/C 204/43

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: H. Gruszecka and D. Pawłowska, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Braun and K. Mojzesowicz, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2010) 1234 of 3 March 2010, adopted pursuant to Article 7(4) of Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2008 L 108, p. 33), ordering the Polish regulatory authority in the field of electronic communications services and postal services to withdraw two notified draft measures concerning the national wholesale market for IP traffic exchange (IP transit) (Case PL/2009/1019) and the wholesale market for IP peering with the network of Telekomunikacja Polska S.A. (TP) (Case PL/2009/1020).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible;

| 2. | Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 209, 31.7.2010.

1

---
### C OURT OF 

### A PPEALS FOR THE



### F IRST 

### D ISTRICT OF 

### T EXAS AT 

### H OUSTON



### N OTICE OF 

### O RDER ON 

### M OTION

November 7, 2008 Revision Cause number: 01

- 12

- 00387

- CV

Style: Sharon Huston

v United Parcel Services Inc

.

Date motion filed * : July 15, 2013

Type of motion: Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Brief

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed: Appellant' s brief

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: July 29, 2013

 The Clerk is instructed to file the document as of the date of this order

 T he Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

 Denied

 Dismi ssed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot)

Judge's signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Panel consists of

______________________________ .

Date: July 17, 2013
Exhibit 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors
of Financial Security Assurance Holdings Ltd.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements, as
amended, of Financial Security Assurance Holdings Ltd. and Subsidiaries on Form
S-8 (File No. 33-78784), Form S-3 (File No. 33-80769) and Form S-4 (File No.
33-99626) of:

1.     Our report dated January 24, 1997 on our audits of the consolidated
       financial statements of Financial Security Assurance Holdings Ltd. and
       Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and for each of three
       years in the period ended December 31, 1996, which report is incorporated
       by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
       December 31, 1996;

2.     Our report dated January 24, 1997 on our audits of the financial
       statement schedule of Financial Security Assurance Holdings Ltd. and
       Subsidiaries, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K
       for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996; and

3.     Our report dated January 24, 1997 on our audits of the consolidated
       financial statements of Financial Security Assurance Inc. and
       Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and for each of the
       three years in the period ended December 31, 1996, which report is
       included in exhibit 99 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
       year ended December 31, 1996.

                                        /s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.

                                        COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

New York, New York
March 24, 1997
§ 2.150 Import permit. ( a ) No person shall import a live dog from any part of the world into the States for purposes of resale unless the dog is accompanied by an import permit issued by APHIS and is imported into the States within 30 days after the proposed date of arrival stated in the import permit.
( b ) An application for an import permit must be submitted to the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Animal Care, 4700 River Road Unit 84, Riverdale, MD 20737-1234 or though Animal Care's Web site (*http://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_welfare/*). Application forms for import permits may be obtained from Animal Care at the address listed above.
( c ) The completed application must include the following information: ( 1 ) The name and address of the person intending to export the dog(s) to the States;
( 2 ) The name and address of the person intending to import the dog(s) into the States;
( 3 ) The number of dogs to be imported and the breed, sex, age, color, markings, and other identifying information of each dog;
( 4 ) The purpose of the importation;
( 5 ) The port of embarkation and the mode of transportation;
( 6 ) The port of entry in the United States;
( 7 ) The proposed date of arrival in the States; and
( 8 ) The name and address of the person to whom the dog(s) will be delivered in the States and, if the dog(s) is or are imported for resale for research purposes, the USDA registration number of the research facility where the dog will be used for research, tests, or experiments.
( d ) After receipt and review of the application by APHIS, an import permit indicating the applicable conditions for importation under this subpart may be issued for the importation of the dog(s) described in the application if such dog(s) appears to be eligible to be imported. Even though an import permit has been issued for the importation of a dog, the dog may only be imported if all applicable requirements of this subpart and any other applicable regulations of this subchapter and any other statute or regulation of any State or of the United States are met.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0379) [79 FR 48659, Aug. 18, 2014, as amended at 85 FR 28798, May 13, 2020]
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Opens Second Application Window for Distance Learning and Telemedicine Grant 

Program Funding

WASHINGTON, April 14, 2020 – U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Deputy Under Secretary for Rural 

Development Bette Brand today announced that USDA has opened a second application window for funding 

under the Distance Learning and Telemedicine (DLT) grant program.

This window includes an additional $25 million that Congress recently provided to the program under the 

Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act (CARES Act). Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, USDA is 

providing this additional window for those who were not able to complete applications prior to the first 

application deadline for the DLT program. Any money not awarded under the first application window will be 

made available in addition to the $25 million.

Electronic applications for the second application window may be submitted through grants.gov beginning 

today and are due no later than July 13, 2020. Paper applications will not be accepted. Additional information 

on how to apply is now available on grants.gov.

Applicants eligible for DLT grants include most state and local governmental entities, federally recognized 

tribes, nonprofits, and for-profit businesses.

USDA Rural Development has taken many immediate actions to help rural residents, businesses and 

communities affected by the COVID-19 outbreak. To learn more about Rural Development’s COVID-19 

response, visit www.rd.usda.gov/coronavirus. 

USDA Rural Development provides loans and grants to help expand economic opportunities and create jobs in 

rural areas. This assistance supports infrastructure improvements; business development; housing; community 

facilities such as schools, public safety and health care; and high-speed internet access in rural areas. For more 

information, visit www.rd.usda.gov.

If you’d like to subscribe to USDA Rural Development updates, visit our GovDelivery subscriber page.

#

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 537 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide the work opportunity 

tax credit with respect to hiring veterans who are receiving educational 

assistance under laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs 

or Defense. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 25, 2019 

Ms. ROSEN (for herself, Mr. MORAN, Ms. STABENOW, Mr. GARDNER, Mr. 

CRAMER, and Ms. BALDWIN) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

the work opportunity tax credit with respect to hiring 

veterans who are receiving educational assistance under 

laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs 

or Defense. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hire Student Veterans 

5 Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 537 IS

1 SEC. 2. WORK OPPORTUNITY TAX CREDIT FOR HIRING VET2 ERANS RECEIVING EDUCATIONAL ASSIST3 ANCE UNDER LAWS ADMINISTERED BY THE 

4 SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS OR DE5 FENSE. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 51(d)(3)(A) of the Inter7 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘or’’ 

8 at the end of clause (iii), by striking the period at the 

9 end of clause (iv) and inserting ‘‘, or’’, and by adding at 

10 the end the following new clause: 

11 ‘‘(v) attending an educational institu12 tion by means of educational assistance 

13 provided under chapter 30, 31, 32, 33, or 

14 34 of title 38, United States Code, or 

15 chapter 1606 or 1607 of title 10, United 

16 States Code.’’. 

17 (b) MODIFICATION OF MINIMUM EMPLOYMENT PE18 RIOD.—Section 51(i)(3)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code 

19 of 1986 is amended by inserting ‘‘(other than a qualified 

20 veteran described in subsection (d)(3)(A)(v))’’ after ‘‘In 

21 the case of an individual’’. 

22 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

23 this section shall apply to individuals who begin work for 

24 the employer after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
#### § 82.19 Definitions.

As used in connection with this subpart, the following terms shall have the meaning set forth in this section.

*Accredited veterinarian.* A veterinarian approved by the Administrator in accordance with part 161 of this chapter to perform functions specified in subchapters B, C, and D of this chapter.

*Administrator.* The Administrator of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service or any individual authorized to act for the Administrator.

*Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.* The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service of the United States Department of Agriculture.

*Bird.* Any member of the class *aves* other than poultry.

*Chlamydiosis.* A contagious bacterial disease of birds and poultry, characterized by respiratory and systemic infection. The disease is also known as psittacosis in psittacine birds and as ornithosis in poultry.

*Federal representative.* An individual employed and authorized by the Federal government to perform the tasks required by this subpart.

*Federal veterinarian.* A veterinarian employed and authorized by the Federal government to perform the tasks required by this subpart.

*Infected.* Affected by the virus or bacterium that causes the specified disease.

*Interstate.* From one State into or through any other State.

*Moved.* Shipped, transported or otherwise moved, or delivered or received for movement, by any person.

*Person.* Any individual, corporation, company, association, firm, partnership, society, joint stock company, or other legal entity.

*Poultry.* Chickens, doves, ducks, geese, grouse, guinea fowl, partridges, pea fowl, pheasants, pigeons, quail, swans, and turkeys.

*State.* Each of the States of the United States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, the Virgin Islands of the United States, or any other territory or possession of the United States.

*State animal health official.* The State official responsible for livestock- and poultry-disease control and eradication programs.

*State representative.* An individual employed in animal health work and authorized by a State or political subdivision of a State to perform the tasks required by this subpart.

*Veterinarian in charge.* A Federal veterinarian employed by the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service and authorized by the Administrator to supervise and manage the animal health work of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service in a specified area of the United States.
# C_2010234EN.01004001.xml

| 28.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/40

---

Action brought on 26 May 2010 — Rungis Express/HABM — Žito (MARESTO)

(Case T-243/10)

()

2010/C 234/73

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: RUNGIS Express AG (Meckenheim, Germany) (represented by: U. Feldmann, Rechtsanwalt)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: ŽITO prehrambena industrija, d.d. (Ljubljana, Slovenia)

Other party in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Forms of order sought

Forms of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 11 March 2010 in Case R 691/2009-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 11 March 2010 in Case R 691/2009-1;

| — | Dismiss the Defendant's opposition. |
| --- | --- |

—

Dismiss the Defendant's opposition.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark MARESTO for goods in Class 29.

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the marks cited in opposition: ŽITO prehrambena industrija, d.d.

Proprietor of the marks cited in opposition:

Marks cited in opposition: National pictorial mark depicting a cook and including the word element M·A·E·S·T·R·O for goods in Classes 29 and 30, a national pictorial mark including the word element M•A•E•S•T•R•O for goods in Classes 29, 30 and 43, and the national word mark ‘BRAVO MAESTRO!’ for goods in Classes 29, 30 and 43.

Marks cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld.

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1) (b), (c) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, (1) on the ground that the marks cited in opposition lacked distinctive character and/or were purely descriptive.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1)

1

---
##### 



Exhibit 32.3 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS I, Derek Chang, the Interim Co-Chief Financial Officer of Renaissance
Media Group LLC, Renaissance Media (Louisiana) LLC, Renaissance Media
(Tennessee) LLC and Renaissance Media Capital Corporation (collectively, the
Company) in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, the
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004
(the Report) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission:  
    
    fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. /s/ Derek ChangDerek ChangInterim Co-Chief Financial Officer(Co-Principal Financial Officer)November 12, 2004
Management Bulletin R8-MB 28 January 1989

COOPERATIVE FORESTRY

Forest Service 4

Wjpdate sarrtamRegol.USQAfiauitSavics.1720 Fbschrr#, f-k+.. NJN.. Adaa.Go. 30367

Optimum Timing-for Ground-applied

Forestry Herbicides in the South

By hmu H. Milta, RdFwwa,

, souIhanFolrrstBxpaimaustmiotId

LuryM.BiShOpl?3K&Mrmgement

Sped&t, Southan Region

Your success in applying a fonstry herbicide able, both before and after application. You must

dcpcndsonsevexakritical fk. Fiit.youmust alsocousidcr the env~nmtntal impact and potcnaccurately identify the w(x4 spkcies to be con- tial cffccts on your neighbors’ propexty. Then you

trolled. Then you must sclcct a herbicide that cf- must carcfblly apply the herbicide at the proper

fcctively controls these specks. Moxcover, the rate. Just as importantly, you must apply the treatcrop trac must be tistant to, or protected from, mcnt during the optimum time of the year. See the

the herbicide. Weather conditions must be favor- chart bc~ow.

Optiinum Timingfor He&M AppkYcathP

J JAN 1 FE9 1 KAR 1 APIt’ 1 --- HAY 1 -- JUN 1 JUL 1 Av I SEP I o(;T i NOV I DEC 1

Ilctiucca!ws wt.!! control --_-... - -~__.__

Vclpar I.

ic-L1 ,a,

--.

:--...+ i ; i i

rordon 101R/RTu ]

2.4-D mine

Carla, jA

-UP : : L -.-I

Dimted ---.-Sprays :’

:lst F”lj : :
Indeed, failure of a herbicide treatment often

comes from failure to properly consider the time of

year for application. Applicators are sometimes

prone to take a chance on using a herbicide outside

the optimum time frame. Then, when disappointing results occur, the herbicide is often blamed for

the wasted effort and expense.

Extensive research has now established optimum times for most ground-applied forestry herbicides, so much of the guesswork has been eliminated. Now you can select a herbicide and apply

it when it will help your chances of success.

The chart shows most ground-applied herbicides currently labeled for forestry use in the

South-This information is current as of September 30, 1988.

, 1

REMEMBER: READ IXE EmIRE PRODUCTLABEL AND USE ONLY ACCORDING

TO LABEL lTWPRUCTIONS 1

DISCLAIMER: Use of trade names is for the

reader’s information and does not constitute official endorsement or approval by the U.S. Department of Agriculture to the exclusion of any other

suitable product or process.

Pesticides used improperly can be injurious to

humans, animals and plants. Follow thedirections

and heed all precautions on the label. Store pesticides in original containers under lock and key out

of the reach of children and animals and away

from food and feed. n
§ 83.1 Purpose and scope of part. This part describes the policy and prescribes the procedures of the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) with respect to maintaining and protecting the privacy of GAO personnel records. While GAO is not subject to the Privacy Act (Act) (5 U.S.C. 552a), GAO's policy is to conduct its activities in a manner that is consistent with the spirit of the Act and its duties, functions, and responsibilities to the Congress. Application of the Privacy Act to GAO is not to be inferred from the provisions of these regulations. These regulations are designed to safeguard individuals against invasions of personal privacy by requiring GAO, except as otherwise provided by law, to— ( a ) Protect privacy interests of individuals by imposing requirements of accuracy, relevance, and confidentiality for the maintenance and disclosure of personnel records;
( b ) Inform individuals of the existence of systems of personnel records maintained by GAO containing personal information; and
( c ) Inform individuals of the right to see and challenge the contents of personnel records containing information about them.
This part applies to all systems of personnel records (as defined in § 83.3(g)) for which GAO is responsible.
§ 381.6 Establishments requiring inspection. Inspection under the regulations is required at: ( a ) Every establishment, except as provided in § 381.10 (a) and (b) or § 381.11, in which any poultry is slaughtered for transportation or sale in commerce, or in which any poultry products are wholly or in part, processed for transportation or sale in commerce, as articles intended for use as human food;
( b ) Every establishment, except as provided in § 381.10 (a) and (b), (c), or (d), or § 381.11, within any State or organized territory which is designated in § 381.221 pursuant to section 5(c) of the Act, at which any poultry is slaughtered or any poultry products are processed, for use as human food solely for distribution within such jurisdiction; and
( c ) Except as provided in § 381.10 (a) and (b), or (c), or § 381.11, every establishment designated by the Administrator pursuant to section 5(c) of the Act as one producing adulterated poultry products which would clearly endanger the public health.