alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUAN JOSE HERRERA

- CABEZA, Petitioner,

v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. No. 12

- 73017 Agency No. A072

- 131

- 472

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted November 18, 2014 ** Before: LEAVY , FISHER, and N

. R

. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Juan Jose Herrera

- Cabeza, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals ’ ( “ BIA ” ) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum and withholding of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

NOV 28 2014 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 12

- 73017

review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility determinations created by the REAL ID
Act

. Shrestha v. Holder , 590 F.3d 1034, 1039

- 40 (9th Cir. 2010 ). We review for abuse of discretion the agency’s denial of a motion to re mand. Movsisian v. Ashcroft , 395 F.3d 1095, 1098 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny the petition for review. We lack jurisdiction to consider Cabeza’s past persecution claim because he did not raise it to the agency. See Barron v. Ashcroft , 358 F.3d 674, 677

- 78 (9th Cir. 2004) (no jurisdiction over legal claims not presented in administrative proceedings below). Further, Herrera

- Cabeza does not raise any challenge to the agency’s dispositive finding that he failed to demonstrate a well

- founded fear of persecution, where he returned to El Salvador and lived without harm for over three years. See Martinez

- Serrano v. INS , 94 F.3d 1256, 125 9

- 60 (9th Cir. 1996) (issues not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are waived); see also Hakeem v. INS , 273 F.3d 812, 816 (9th Cir. 2001) (“[a]n applicant’s claim of persecution upon return is weakened, even undercut,

. . . when the applicant has returned to the country without incident.”) , superseded by statute on other grounds as stated in Ramadan v. Gonzales , 479 F.3d 646, 650 (9th Cir. 2007)

. Thus, we deny the petition as to Herrera

- Cabeza ’ s asylum claim.3 12

- 73017

Because Herrera

- Cabeza failed to establish eligibility for asylum, his withholding of removal claim necessarily fails. See Zehatye v. Gonzales , 453 F.3d 1182, 1190 (9th Cir. 2006). Finally, the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Herrera

- Cabeza’s request to re mand where he did not establish prima facie eligibility for relief. See Ochoa

- Amaya v. Gonzales , 479 F.3d 989, 992 (9th Cir. 2007) (it is the petitioner ’ s burden to establish prima facie eligibility for the relief sought).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
# C_2010274EN.01002302.xml

| 9.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 274/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 274/23

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 29 July 2010 — Brinkmann v Germany

(Case T-261/10 R)

(Interim measure - Clear lack of jurisdiction)

2010/C 274/36

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Norbert Brinkmann (Rheine, Germany) (represented by: R. Wiegers, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Federal Republic of Germany

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application seeking to suspend application of Paragraphs 47 and 48(a) of the German Federal code on notaries (Bundesnotarordnung) with regard to the applicant.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Costs are reserved.

---
§ 329.6 Articles or livestock subject to judicial seizure and condemnation. Any carcass, part of a carcass, meat or meat food product, or any dead, dying, disabled, or diseased livestock, that is being transported in commerce or is otherwise subject to Title I or II of the Act, or is held for sale in the United States after such transportation, is subject to seizure and condemnation, in a judicial proceeding pursuant to section 403 of the Act if such article or livestock: ( a ) Is or has been prepared, sold, transported, or otherwise distributed or offered or received for distribution in violation of the Act, or
( b ) Is capable of use as human food and is adulterated or misbranded, or
( c ) In any other way is in violation of the Act.
Protection Repolt RR-PR 32 July 1999

Chinese Privet

Ligustrum sinense

Plant: A thicket-forming shrub

with a spreading canopy to 5 m (16

ft) tall, from rhizomes.

Stem: Round, bark not fissured,

brownish to gray, opposite branching, increasingly upward. Branches

gray to green with light dots (Zenticels). Twigs short-rusty hairy,

long, slender, and flexible.

Leaves: Deciduous to semi-evergreen, opposite, ovate to elliptical,

2-4 cm (3/4- I l/2 in) long and l-3

cm (3/g& 1 l/4 in) wide, rounded at

both ends, with a hairy midrib

beneath. Petioks l-5 mm (l/16-

3/1 6 in) long, rusty hairy, opposite

leaves held at right angles to stems.

Flowers: April-June. Loosely

branching, conical, terminal and

upper uxillary clusters. White, 4-

petaled, fragrant, corolla tube 1.5-3

mm (l/16-1/8 in) long, roughly

equal or shorter than the lobes.

Fruit and Seeds: October-February. Pale green ripening to a blueblack drupe, ovoid, 6-7 mm (l/4-9/32 in) long and 4 mm

CYl6 ini wide. hanging in dense clusters.
UAV c ertified by French authorities of Civil Aviation (DGAC)

UAV c ertified by ATEX notified organism



### Base d on the LE 4

- 8X Dual this drone is dedicated to technical and specific s task s in ATEX

environment and can support different ATEX sensors.

Package:

1 Atex UAV octocopter (Zone 2 II 3G IIB T5)

Deployment time: 5 minute s Wingspan 120 cm / 47.2 in

Weight 4200g / 148 oz

Payload 1200g / 42 oz

Flight duration: 8 to 15 minutes (according load)

Parachute

2 batteries

Auto

- pilot (50 waypoints)

2 Pilot stations (Zone 2 II 3G IIB T5) with return video

1 Camera Atex (Zone 2 3G Ex nR II C T 6 )

4 carrying cases (UAV, Stations, Batteries)

Training

For two pilots

11 days in France (onsite possible)

Maintenance

Each 50 fly hours (controls, update, advice)

Machine immobilized 24 hours (+transport)



### Options:

Others Atex Sensor (camera, gaz detector ....)

Batteries

Additional screen Atex

Spare (complete configuration) 

## Xamen Technologies

28 rue des Laurets

64000 Pau

– France

Your c ontact:

Thibault SERGENT

t. sergent @xamen.fr

+33 651 971 540

Pictures are not contractual. Xamen reserves the right to modify all part of its model 

# www.xamen.fr

www.drone

- atex.fr
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF SILVER CINEMAS, INTERNATIONAL,
INC. AS OF MARCH 31, 1999, AND THE RELATED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1999.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       6,214,168
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  653,576
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    564,911
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,432,655
<PP&E>                                      71,757,410
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,641,969
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             134,792,388
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,760,618
<BONDS>                                    100,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 35,987,442
<COMMON>                                         1,398
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,404,564
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               134,792,388
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            28,595,081
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               25,153,418
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,919,368
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,000,080)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,000,080)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,000,080)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
BLANCHE L. LINCOLN, ARKANSAS

CHAIRMAN i'ATHICK J- LLAFY, VERMONT iOMFNNKIN, IOWA KI :NI OONNAp, N()FITH DAKOTA h1AX BAUCU$ . MON7ANA oelafilt STAl1eNC~W, Nua+usAN tl BF .N.IAMINNCLSON .NEBfiASKA S! 11 ; ItR00 Bfib W N . OHIO ROt3f~HT P. CAS

" .".Y, JR., Pi1NNSYI .VANfA AMY~KLOE3UCIIAR, MINNESOTA MtCHAF . f3ENNET, COLONAt90 KIflS1'LN Ci1LLIt31iANp . NEW YORK 

# `ulnited ~6- taes ~cnatc COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE, NUTRITION, AND FORESTRY WASHINGTON, DC 20510-6000

202-224--2035 July 2, 2010 

### The Honorable Lisa Jackson Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W . Washington, D

.C. 20460 Dear Administrator Jackson: SAXBY CHAMBLISS, GEORGIA RANKING REPUBLICAN MEMBER aC1Ala) G

. LU(AR, INDIANA THAI) COCHRAN, MISSISSIPPI MI TCH McCONNELL, Kt:NTUC :KY PAT f1O6f

RTS, KANSAS h11Kf:JOHANNS. NEBRASKA CHANI .lS E. GRASSLFY, IOWA JOHN 1HUNl . SOU1HOAKOTA .JOHN c:ORNYN, 'TEXAS

We are very concerned about the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) 

### decision in the Prevention ofSigniticant Deterioration (PSD) and Title V Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule to consider the emissions fromblonlass Combustion the same as enllsston5 from fossil fuels.

EPA's decision contradicts long-standlng U.S. policy, as well as the agency's own proposed ~I'allol'lng Rule . Emissions fromthe combustion of biomass are not included in the Department o1~ C

;ncrgy's Voluntary greenhouse gas (GI-IG) emissions reporting guidelines and neither are they required to be reported under EPA's GHG Reporting Rule. In the proposed Tailoring Rule, EPA proposed to calculate a source's GI-IG emissions based upon EPA's Inventory of U

.S . Gl'IG Emissions and Sinks . The GHGInventory eXClUdes blonlass e1111sslons . We think you would agree that renewable biomass should play a more significant role in our nation's energy policy . Unfortunately, the Tailoring Rule is discouraging the responsible development and utilization of renewable biomass. It has already forced numerous biomass energy projects into limbo. We are also concerned that it will impose new, unnecessary regulations on the current use of biomass for energy. We appreciate that EPA intends to seek further comments on how to address biomass emissions under the PSD and Title V programs. With this rule, the agency has made a fundamental change in policy with little explanation . We strongly encourage you to reconsider this decision and immediately begin the process of seeking comments on it. In addition, we appreciate Secretary of Agriculture "1'omVilsack's commitment to working with EPA on this issue and encourage you to utilize the expertise of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.Please let us know as soon as possible the agency's plans on this matter. We appreciate your attention to this important issue. 

### Sincerely,



## M -A'v4'

# 91* aw-~

' ,- -

` :y 

# 7



# " ~~l ~ ~

# C2



# - *0,,zt 9 4--) . /1,"- W-O-Z
### §3704b–2. Transfer of Federal scientific and technical information

#### (a) Transfer

The head of each Federal executive department or agency shall transfer in a timely manner to the National Technical Information Service unclassified scientific, technical, and engineering information which results from federally funded research and development activities for dissemination to the private sector, academia, State and local governments, and Federal agencies. Only information which would otherwise be available for public dissemination shall be transferred under this subsection. Such information shall include technical reports and information, computer software, application assessments generated pursuant to section 3710(c) of this title, and information regarding training technology and other federally owned or originated technologies. The Secretary shall issue regulations within one year after February 14, 1992, outlining procedures for the ongoing transfer of such information to the National Technical Information Service.

#### (b) Annual report to Congress

As part of the annual report required under section 3704b(f)(3) of this title, the Secretary shall report to Congress on the status of efforts under this section to ensure access to Federal scientific and technical information by the public. Such report shall include—

(1) an evaluation of the comprehensiveness of transfers of information by each Federal executive department or agency under subsection (a);

(2) a description of the use of Federal scientific and technical information;

(3) plans for improving public access to Federal scientific and technical information; and

(4) recommendations for legislation necessary to improve public access to Federal scientific and technical information.

(Pub. L. 102–245, title I, §108, Feb. 14, 1992, 106 Stat. 13.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the American Technology Preeminence Act of 1991, and not as part of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 which comprises this chapter.
HYDROLOGIC CYCLE

Transport
# C_2010134EN.01005501.xml

| 22.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 134/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/55

---

Action brought on 10 March 2010 — M. Almeida Campos and Others v Council

(Case F-16/10)

2010/C 134/92

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: M. Almeida Campos and Others (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decisions not to promote the applicants to grade AD 12 in the 2009 promotion procedure and, in so far as necessary, of the decisions to promote to that grade in the same promotion procedure the officials whose names appear in the lists of persons promoted published in CP no 97/09 of 27 April 2009 and CP no 93/09 of 13 May 2009.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decisions not to promote the applicants to grade AD 12 in the 2009 promotion procedure; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decisions not to promote the applicants to grade AD 12 in the 2009 promotion procedure;

| — | in so far as necessary, annul the decisions to promote to grade AD 12 in the 2009 promotion procedure the officials whose names appear in the lists of persons promoted published in CP no 97/09 of 27 April 2009 and CP no 93/09 of 13 May 2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

in so far as necessary, annul the decisions to promote to grade AD 12 in the 2009 promotion procedure the officials whose names appear in the lists of persons promoted published in CP no 97/09 of 27 April 2009 and CP no 93/09 of 13 May 2009;

| — | order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs.

---
#### § 54.22 State scrapie certification boards.

An area veterinarian in charge, after consulting with a State representative and industry representatives, may appoint a State scrapie certification board for the purpose of coordinating activities for the Scrapie Flock Certification Program, including making decisions to admit flocks to the Scrapie Flock Certification Program and to change flock status in accordance with the Scrapie Flock Certification Program standards. These boards are not appointed for the purpose of providing APHIS with consensus advice or policy recommendations. No more than one State scrapie certification board may be formed in each State. Each State scrapie certification board shall include as members the area veterinarian in charge, one or more State representatives, one or more accredited veterinarians, when possible, and one or more owners of flocks, and, at the discretion of the area veterinarian in charge, may include other members.
NOTICE

This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the

Department of Transportation in the interest of information

exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for

the contents or use thereof.
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATION****PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002****SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350,CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE**

Pursuant tosection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officers ofCorgenix Medical Corporation, a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), does herebycertify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB forthe quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities an ExchangeCommission (the “10-QSB Report”) that:

i.      the 10-QSB Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

ii.   the information contained in the 10-QSB Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

Dated:    May 15, 2007

**ThisCertification is made solely for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject tothe knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.**

**Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to the Company and will be retained by theCompany and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request. This written statement shall not be deemed to be “filed” as partof the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB that it accompanies.**
| /s/ Douglass T. Simpson                |   |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| President and  Chief Executive Officer |   |   |

 
| /s/ William H. Critchfield                         |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Senior Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |   |   |

 

----
2 2 ~-._) f~ :.~ q, 

Docket Management Facility 

US Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

West Building Ground Floor 

Room Wl2-140 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Mr. Allen: 

JAN 1 4 2013 

1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW 

Washington, DC 20229 

U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection 

This letter is informing you that the United States Customs and Border Protection (CBP), Office of 

Air and Marine (OAM) is requesting the renewal of Exemption No. 10300. In a letter dated May 23, 

2011 this office requested an exemption to 14 CFR §91.209(a) (1) and (b) during operations ofthe 

Predator-B/MQ-9 Unmanned Aircraft in the National Airspace System. Additionally this office 

requested that a summary of the petition not be published in the Federal Register due to the potential 

security-sensitivity ofthe exemption, which the FAA also granted. Ifthe FAA approves the renewal 

of exemption No. 10300, this office is requesting again that it not be published in the Federal 

Register. 

Justification for this renewal request remains the same as the original request dated May 23, 2011; 

CBP has evidence that entities engaging in illicit activity along the borders are actively surveilling 

. the night skies for the presence of the Predator "B", which is clearly visible due to the anti-collision 

lights and position lights. Additionally evidence exists that Night Vision Goggles are also be used to 

detect the Predator "B". 

The point of contact for this renewal will be Richard Booth, Director, Domain Operations and Integration. He 

can be reached at 202-344-2889 and richard.booth@dhs.gov . 

Sincerely, 

Lothar Eckardt 

Executive Director 

National Air Security Operations 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

Office of Air and Marine
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Wehereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement on Form N-1A (the “RegistrationStatement”) of our report dated February 13, 2015, relating to the financial statements and financialhighlights which appears in the December 31, 2014 Annual Report to Shareholders of T. Rowe Price Small-CapValue Fund, Inc., which are also incorporated by reference into the Registration Statement. We also consentto the references to us under the headings “Financial Highlights”, “Independent RegisteredPublic Accounting Firm” and “Fund Service Providers” in such Registration Statement. 

/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPPricewaterhouseCoopers LLPBaltimore, MarylandAugust12, 2015