alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit


Canadian Pacific Railway Company Pension Plan


Consolidated as at January 1, 2009


Amendment Number 3    Page 1




AMENDMENT NUMBER 3
TO THE CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY PENSION PLAN
CONSOLIDATED AS AT JANUARY 1, 2009
AMENDMENTS FOR IBEW EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2010. 
Effective January 1, 2010,
		
	1.
	Delete subparagraph 17.01 (c) and replace it with the following:


		
	17.01
	(c)    “Buyback Window” means the period commencing and ending on the dates set out in the table below: 


	
			
	 
	 
	 

	Affiliation
	Buyback Window Commencement Date
	Buyback Window 
Ending Date

	 
	 
	 

	CAW-TCA
	March 1, 2008
	June 30, 2011

	CPPA
	January 1, 2010
	June 30, 2013

	IBEW
	January 1, 2010
	June 30, 2013

	RCTC
	January 1, 2003
	June 30, 2006

	TCRC-RTE
	Not applicable
	Not applicable

	TCRC-MWED
	August 1, 2007
	July 1, 2010

	TC/USWA
	January 1, 2010
	June 30, 2013

	Management
	Not applicable
	Not applicable























V:\CANADIAN PACIFIC - 101360\REF\RET\PLAN DOCS\AMENDMENT 3 TO THE JANUARY 1, 2009 PLAN RULES-IBEW.DOC


Canadian Pacific Railway Company Pension Plan


Consolidated as at January 1, 2009


Amendment Number 3    Page 2






		
	2.
	Delete subparagraph 17.02(a) and replace it with the following:


		
	17.02
	(a)    was a Member on the date determined by the Committee as set out in the table below: 


	
		
	 
	 

	Affiliation
	Eligibility Date

	 
	 

	CAW-TCA
	January 1, 2008

	CPPA
	January 1, 2006

	IBEW
	January 1, 2010

	RCTC
	January 1, 2003

	TCRC-RTE
	Not applicable

	TCRC-MWED
	August 1, 2007

	TC/USWA
	January 1, 2010

	Management
	Not applicable







V:\CANADIAN PACIFIC - 101360\REF\RET\PLAN DOCS\AMENDMENT 3 TO THE JANUARY 1, 2009 PLAN RULES-IBEW.DOC
#     Drug Use Trends

### Categories Related to Drug Use Trends

                      - Alcohol
                      - Alcohol Use Disorder
                      - Any SUD
                      - Tobacco
                      - Adolescents as Population Group
                      - Mature Adults as Population Group
                      - Illegal Drugs
                      - Marijuana
                      - Pain Relievers
                      - Cocaine
                      - Young Adults as Population Group
                      - Older Adults as Population Group
                      - People with Alcohol Use or Abuse Problems as Population Group
                      - People with Substance Use or Abuse Problems as Population Group
                      - Illicit Stimulants

Latest In Drug Use Trends

2019 NSDUH Detailed Tables

Data Table : National Survey on Drug Use and Health - September 11, 2020

2018 NSDUH Detailed Tables

Data Table : National Survey on Drug Use and Health - August 20, 2019

2020 NSDUH Annual National Report

Annual Report : National Survey on Drug Use and Health - October 25, 2021

2019 NSDUH Annual National Report

Annual Report : National Survey on Drug Use and Health - September 11, 2020

2018 NSDUH Annual National Report

Annual Report : National Survey on Drug Use and Health - August 20, 2019

View All
#### § 319.703 Rendered animal fat or mixture thereof.

“Rendered Animal Fat,” or any mixture of fats containing edible rendered animal fat, shall contain no added water, except that “Puff Pastry Shortening” may contain not more than 10 percent of water.

[35 FR 15597, Oct. 3, 1970, as amended at 43 FR 25420, June 13, 1978]
Order entered May 19 , 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 21

- 00006

- CV

CYNTHIA RAMOS , Appellant

V.

DOMINGO H. CISNEROS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 20

- 00429

O RDER
Before the Court is appellant’s May 17, 2021 motion for a sixty

- day

extension of time to file her amended brief. We GRANT the motion to the extent
appellant shall file her amen ded brief no later than July 1, 2021 . Appellee’s brief
will be due thirty days after appellant’s amended brief is filed.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
#### § 1304.404 Commercial marina harbor limits.

The landward limits of commercial marina harbor areas are determined by the extent of land rights held by the dock operator. The lakeward limits of harbors at commercial marinas will be designated by TVA on the basis of the size and extent of facilities at the dock, navigation and flood control requirements, optimum use of lands and land rights owned by the United States, carrying capacity of the reservoir area in the vicinity of the marina, and on the basis of the environmental effects associated with the use of the harbor. Mooring buoys, slips, breakwaters, and permanent anchoring are prohibited beyond the lakeward extent of harbor limits. TVA may, at its discretion, reconfigure harbor limits based on changes in circumstances, including but not limited to, changes in the ownership of the land base supporting the marina.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

VITO PAUL CITO, DOC #R53635, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. )

) Case No. 2D17-2345

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed April 20, 2018.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Pasco County, Kim Campbell, Judge.

Vito Paul Cito, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

NORTHCUTT, SLEET, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
r

- -

Double Cropping Soybeans

County Availability 

Written Agreement - 3 Years History MapCreationDate:Febru ary 09,2023

LayerCredits :PRISM&USDARMA

Option Coverage Available

XC and/or Relay Crop Written Agreement Irrigated Only / Blanket WA Written Agreement - No History Sou rce:USDARis kManag ementAg ency

Blanket Written Agreement Written Agreement - 2 Years History DataCu rent Date:Febru ary 09,2023

MapProjection:USAContig u ou s Albers Equ alAreaConic

Soybeans - Double Cropping Expansion - Public Map RMA Insurance Services

Theinformationdisplayedinthis mapis intendedtoserveas anaidindis playing dataprovidedors toredby theRis kManag ementAg ency.It does not modify,replaceors u pers edeany USDApu blishedpolicy provis ions orprocedu res.

Maps createdby USDARiskManag ementAg ency arefors patialandvis u alcontext fordepicting thebas icinformationfor“where”.Maps arenot cons ideredas u rvey.GeneralReferenceOnly. 

-Pu blicInformation-
#### Joseph D. Kern *v.*Seymour Potter.

• *Pleadings—admission by, in replevin.*In replevin for the wrongful taking and detention of personal property, if the defendant pleads only property in third persons, the taking and detention of the property "will be admitted.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Kendall county; the Hon. -Silvanus Wilcox, Judge, presiding.

This was an action of replevin, by Seymour Potter against Joseph D. Kern, for 1800 pounds of wool. The plaintiff recovered judgment for the property, and costs.

Messrs. Eldridge *&*Lewis, for the appellant.

Mr. T. Lyle Dickey, for the appellee.

Per Curiam :

This case was tried upon issues formed on a count in replevin for the wrongful taking and detention of a quantity of wool. There was no plea of *non*eepit, but pleas of property in third persons, on which issue was taken. As the pleadings stood, the taking and detention of the property were admitted. The evidence upon the issues of fact was conflicting, and was for the jury to pass upon. It is not such a case as will warrant this court in interfering with the verdict of the jury, and the judgment must be affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*
PUBLIC LAW 113–226—DEC. 16, 2014 128 STAT. 2113 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5106: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 160 (2014): 

Sept. 8, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 3, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 113–226 

113th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 100 Admiral 

Callaghan Lane in Vallejo, California, as the ‘‘Philmore Graham Post Office 

Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. PHILMORE GRAHAM POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 100 Admiral Callaghan Lane in Vallejo, California, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Philmore Graham 

Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Philmore Graham Post Office Building’’. 

Approved December 16, 2014. 

Dec. 16, 2014 

[H.R. 5106] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLAWS
Exhibit 10.1a


 


AMMENDMENT TO THE ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT


 


Dated December 1, 2015


 


BETWEEN


 


TARSIER LTD. AND DEMANSYS ENERGY INC.


 


The following Amendment made on December 30, 2015 between Tarsier
Systems Ltd and DemanSYS Energy LLC amends and overrides the Asset purchase Agreement entered into on December 1, 2015 between
the parties.


 


		1.	DemanSYS agrees that should a payment be required for liabilities accrued in advance of December 1st, 2015 that
inhibit Tarsier to enable operation of the Assets. Tarsier will make such payment and it will be deducted from the last payment
with regard to the purchase price. Tarsier will obtain approval from DemanSYS to make such deduction which will not be unreasonably
withheld.



 


		2.	DemanSYS agrees to execute an irrevocable NYISO Form J upon signing of this agreement or at any time requested by Tarsier for
the distribution of NYISO payments to any account as directed by Tarsier.



 


		3.	As of December 31st, 2015 DemanSYS will terminate all of its employees and Tarsier will enter into employment relationships
with those employees.



 


		4.	The parties hereby agree in that the Asset Purchase Agreement is now closed pursuant to the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement
entered into on December 1st, 2015. This closing date supersedes any other references to closing dates in this agreement.



 


		5.	The parties agree that upon successful release of 2,500,000 Tarsier shares from Escrow as pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement,
DemanSYS will only register monthly free trading shares in the amount of 10% of the average trading volume for the previous month.



 


		6.	DemanSYS represents and certified that as of December 31st, DemanSYS is in good standing with Alcoa and the parties have agreed
to the following:



 


a. Continue to provide service under the
original contract dated Dec 30, 2013.


 


b. As of December 31, 2015 the total due Alcoa is
$571,757.95. This amount will be reduced by payments of $150,000 and $135,000 from the $450,000 note, and $75,000 from the DemanSYS
FA account leaving a balance due of $211,757.  This amount is owed by DemanSYS, and will be reflected in the new Alcoa agreement
as a DemanSYS liability and will be reduced by a 5% surcharge to the existing 20% revenue share.


 




     


     


    

 


	Tarsier Ltd.	 
	 	 
	Signature:	/s/ Isaac H. Sutton	 
	 	 	 
	Name Isaac H. Sutton	 
	 	 
	Title: CEO	 
	 	 
	Date: December 30, 2015	 
	 	 
	Demansys Energy Inc.	 
	 	 	 
	Signature:	/s/ Jeffrey M. Lines	 
	 	 	 
	Name:	 	 
	 	 	 
	Title:	 	 
	 	 	 
	Date:
#### § 25.7 Gambling.

Participating in games for money or other personal property or operating gambling devices, conducting a lottery or pool, or selling or purchasing numbers tickets in the GAO Building or on its grounds is prohibited. This prohibition shall not apply to the vending or exchange of chances by licensed blind operators of vending facilities for any lottery set forth in a law of the District of Columbia and conducted by the District of Columbia and authorized by section 2(a)(5) of the Randolph-Sheppard Act (20 U.S.C. 107, *et seq.*).
# C_2010234EN.01003801.xml

| 28.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/38

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 25 June 2010 — Regione Puglia v Commission

(Cases T-84/10 R and T-223/10 R)

(Application for interim measures - Decision to reduce Community financial assistance - Debit note - Application to suspend the operation of a measure - No urgency)

2010/C 234/68

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Regione Puglia (represented by: F. Brunelli and A. Aloia, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Cattabriga and A. Steiblytè, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action to suspend the operation, first, of Commission Decision C(2009) 10350 of 22 December 2009, concerning the cancellation of part of the contribution from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), allocated to Italy for the operational programme POR Puglia, within Objective 1 (2000-2006) and, second, of the payment order contained in the debit note of 26 February 2010 issued following that decision.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | Cases T-84/10 R and T-223/10 R are joined for the purposes of this order. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Cases T-84/10 R and T-223/10 R are joined for the purposes of this order.

| 2. | The applications for interim measures are dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applications for interim measures are dismissed.

| 3. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The costs are reserved.

---
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 14, 2022

No. 04

- 22

- 00329

- CR

John Anthony GARCIA

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021CR2 058

Honorable Jennifer Pena , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s motion for extension of time is GRANTED. Appellan t’s brief is due

November 16, 2022.

_________________________________ Liz a A. Rodriguez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have h ereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 14th day of November, 2022

.

___________________________________ M ichael A. C ruz

, Clerk of Court
Exhibit 20.1
                                                             ------------
                                     
Chase Manhattan Bank Grantor Trust 1996-A


From: The Chase Manhattan Bank

To:   Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.


                   MONTHLY CERTIFICATEHOLDER'S REPORT
                   ----------------------------------

Due Period 17 Beginning Date                     06/01/1997
Due Period 17 End Date                           06/30/1997
Determination Date                               07/10/1997
Remittance Date                                  07/15/1997


I.    Monthly Principal and Principal Carryover Shortfall to Certificateholders
      (Per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                  $ 24.9966384318

II.   Monthly Interest and Unpaid Interest to Certificateholders
      (Per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                   $ 2.2999948259

III.  Monthly Expenses Summary

      A. Servicing Fee Disbursement                                $ 652,076.74
      B. Cash Collateral Account Expense                                 $ 0.00
      C. Total Expenses paid
         (per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                $ 0.4423066996

IV.   Cash Collateral Account Deposit Amount                             $ 0.00

V.    Outstanding Advance Summary

      A. From Prior Period                                       $ 4,086,639.20
      B. From Current Period                                     $ 3,932,662.65
      C. Change in Amount Between Periods (Lines B - A)           $ -153,976.55

VI.   Pool Factor Information

      A. Certificate Principal Balance                         $ 745,640,446.25
      B. Initial Certificate Balance                         $ 1,474,263,764.33
      C. Pool Factor (Lines A / B)                               0.505771398776

VII.  Available Cash Collateral Account Information for Due Period

      A. Available Cash Collateral Amount                       $ 39,124,604.23
      B. Available Cash Collateral Amount Percentage            5.000000000511%

VIII. Required Cash Collateral Amount

      A. For the Current Collection Period                      $ 39,124,604.23
      B. For the Next Collection Period                         $ 37,282,022.31
### §1520. Repealed. Pub. L. 91–412, §3(d), Sept. 25, 1970, 84 Stat. 864

Section, act Dec. 19, 1942, ch. 780, 56 Stat. 1067, authorized Secretary of Commerce to establish schedule of fees or charges for services or publications furnished by Department of Commerce, excepting Federal and State governments, provided for covering proceeds thereof into the Treasury as miscellaneous receipts, and specified that its provisions shall not alter, amend, modify, or repeal any existing law for prescription of fees or charges. See sections 1525 to 1527 of this title.
### §57c–1. Staff exchanges

#### (a) In general

The Commission may—

(1) retain or employ officers or employees of foreign government agencies on a temporary basis as employees of the Commission pursuant to section 42 of this title or section 3101 or section 3109 of title 5; and

(2) detail officers or employees of the Commission to work on a temporary basis for appropriate foreign government agencies.

#### (b) Reciprocity and reimbursement

The staff arrangements described in subsection (a) need not be reciprocal. The Commission may accept payment or reimbursement, in cash or in kind, from a foreign government agency to which this section is applicable, or payment or reimbursement made on behalf of such agency, for expenses incurred by the Commission, its members, and employees in carrying out such arrangements.

#### (c) Standards of conduct

A person appointed under subsection (a)(1) shall be subject to the provisions of law relating to ethics, conflicts of interest, corruption, and any other criminal or civil statute or regulation governing the standards of conduct for Federal employees that are applicable to the type of appointment.

(Sept. 26, 1914, ch. 311, §25A, as added Pub. L. 109–455, §9, Dec. 22, 2006, 120 Stat. 3381.)

#### Repeal of Section

For repeal of section by section 13 of Pub. L. 109–455, see Effective Date of Repeal note below.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Section repealed effective Sept. 30, 2027, see section 13 of Pub. L. 109–455, as amended, set out as a Termination Date of 2006 Amendment note under section 44 of this title.
### SUBCHAPTER II—BILLING AND COLLECTION
### SUBCHAPTER I—KEEPING AMERICAN WORKERS PAID AND EMPLOYED
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Cambridge Heart, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Robert B. Palardy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|Dated: March 30, 2004 | /s/ROBERT B. PALARDYRobert B. Palardy
Chief Financial Officer
|--------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
§ 112.8 For export only. The applicable regulations for packaging and labeling a biological product produced in the United States shall apply to such biological product if exported from the United States except as otherwise provided in this section. Only labels approved as provided in § 112.5 shall be used. ( a ) Biological products which have been packaged and labeled for export or which have been exported, shall be subject to the applicable provisions in this paragraph. ( 1 ) After leaving the licensed establishment, a biological product shall not be bottled, repackaged, relabeled, or otherwise altered in any way while in the United States; and
( 2 ) An exported biological product shall not be returned to the United States: *Provided,* That, in the case of a biological product exported in labeled final containers, the Administrator may authorize by permit the importation of a limited number for research and evaluation by the producing licensee; and
( 3 ) An exported biological product which is bottled, rebottled, or altered in any way in a foreign country shall not bear a label which indicates by establishment license number that it has been prepared in the United States.
( b ) Desiccated and frozen liquid products, packaged and labeled as for domestic use, may be exported without the diluent required for rehydration or dilution, as the case may be, if the labeling includes adequate instructions for preparing the product for use and the words “For Export Only”.
( c ) Final containers of products, labeled or unlabeled, may be exported in sealed shipping boxes, adequately identified as to contents with an approved label, and plainly marked “For Export Only”: *Provided,* That such products shall not be diverted to domestic use.
( d ) Completed inactivated liquid products, antiserums, and antitoxins, may be exported in large multiple-dose containers identified with an approved label that contains the words “For Export Only” prominently displayed.
( e ) Concentrated inactivated liquid product, completed except for dilution to the proper strength for use, may be exported in large multiple-dose containers identified with an approved label that contains the words “For Export Only” prominently displayed.
[38 FR 12094, May 9, 1973, as amended at 39 FR 19202, May 31, 1974; 40 FR 46093, Oct. 6, 1975; 43 FR 11145, Mar. 17, 1978; 56 FR 66784, Dec. 26, 1991]
# C_2016016EN.01002702.xml

| 18.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 24 November 2015 — Wesergold Getränke v OHIM Lidl Stiftung — (WESTERN GOLD)

(Case T-278/10 RENV) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark WESTERN GOLD - Earlier national, Community and international word marks WeserGold, Wesergold and WESERGOLD - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Decision on the appeal - Article 64(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 - Obligation to state reasons - Right to be heard - Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009))

(2016/C 016/33)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: riha WeserGold Getränke GmbH & Co. KG, formerly Wesergold Getränkeindustrie GmbH & Co. KG (Rinteln, Germany) (represented by: T. Melchert, P. Goldenbaum and I. Rohr, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented initially by A. Pohlmann, and subsequently by S. Hanne, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG (Neckarsulm, Germany) (represented by: A. Marx and M. Wolter, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 24 March 2010 (Case R 770/2009-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Wesergold Getränkeindustrie GmbH & Co. KG and Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders riha WeserGold Getränke GmbH & Co. KG to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) and by Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG in the proceedings before the General Court and the Court of Justice. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders riha WeserGold Getränke GmbH & Co. KG to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) and by Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG in the proceedings before the General Court and the Court of Justice.

---

(1)  OJ C 221, 14.8.2010.

1

---