alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM
10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO THE UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED THEREIN.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,428,882
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       3,080,616
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  2,916,560
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                     164,183,451
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                       157,381,652
<LOANS>                                    165,907,180
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,365,366
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             352,983,922
<DEPOSITS>                                 235,410,999
<SHORT-TERM>                                13,000,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          2,085,982
<LONG-TERM>                                 54,050,553
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        41,972
<OTHER-SE>                                  48,394,416
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             352,983,922
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              5,982,959
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            5,684,778
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               212,232
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            11,879,969
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           4,403,603
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,312,744
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        5,567,225
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              3,201,399
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,651,597
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,700,737
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,700,737
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.44
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.31
<LOANS-NON>                                    142,376
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                90,702
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,400,366
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   35,000
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,365,366
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,009,366
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        356,000


</TABLE>
# J/D? lrfal'ylcmdDeptll'tment

# of Planning Riehl/rdHbt,htllt 111111 Mtlltill**O~Ht"l!J** Sm'tllll,Y Gtll'i'l'1It1r AII/hfJl!!G. DroJl/1I Mtlllhfll',. Pl)lWr U. GfJIW71fJI' DfpllO'SUftltll)· January 14,2010

Ms. Deborah Rabin Regulations Coordinator, Air and Radiation Management Administration Maryland Department ofthe Environment 1800 Washington Boulevard Suite 730 Baltimore, MD 21230
REVISED STATECLEARINGHOUSEREVIEW PROCESS

State Application (denUDer: MDl0091217-1592 Project Descl'lptlon: Proposed Amendments to Air Quality Regulations and Submission for approval as part ofState Implementation Plan: adhesives and sealants; paper, film, and foil coatings; industrial cleaning solvents; flexible packaging printing; lithographic and lelle(preSs printing; flat wood panelingcoatings; recent Public Service Commission regulatory actions to clarify that modifications to power plants are subject to the Federal Clean Air Act: Public Hearing 1121/2010 PI'oJect Location: Maryland ClearInghouseContaet: Bob Rosenbush Dear Ms. Rabin: Thank you for submitting your project for intergovernmental review. Participation in the Marylnnd Intergovernmental Review and Coordination (MiRC) process helps ensure project consistency with plans, programs, and objectives ofStute agencies and local governments. Notice ofyour application is being provided to State and local public officials through the IlItergove"'IIIelltalMOIl/tor, which is a weekly Internet publication identifying projects received by the State Clearinghouse for Intergovernmental Assistance. This document may be viewed at httl.:llwww.mdp.state.md.us/CLlIOUSEImonitor 1Y04.hlm. The project has been assigned aunique Slate Application Identifierthat should be used on all documents and correspondence. One form is enclosed with Ihis letter. The "Project Status Form" should be completed and returned a/1er you receive notice that your project was approved ornot approved. All MIRC requirements have been met in accordance with Code ofMaryland Regulations (COMAR 34.02.01.04-.06) and this concludes the review process for the above referenced project. Ifyou need assistance or have questions, contact the State Clearinghouse stalTperson noted above at 410-767·4490 or through e-mail atbrosenbush@mdp.state.md.us

. Thankyou for yourcooperation with the MIRC process. Sincerely, 

# \**ll,,~i** L (' 

# ,)111*-;' })'l/1/t-/

LindaC. Janey, J.D., Assistant Secretary for Clearinghollse and Communications LCJ:BR Enclosure cc: Kathleen l1Iinebury

- EPA 09-/591. NMNli.lI'tfoc

)01 IlYnl Pmloll Slftfl • SlIilt /101 • RtI/lj!JJOft. MIIIj'/oJIII21201.2.J05 T"ltphoJIf: 410.767.4500 • Fox: 410.767.4480 • TollFru: 1.877.767.6271 • TlY Vms: ,\It/O'llIlItiRlk!} /lIltmf/: Pklllflitl!,.MtIIJ'klfld§J1I
EXHIBIT 32.b
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P. (the “Fund”) on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Marc N. Teal, Principal Financial Officer of the general partner of the general partner of the Fund’s general partner, C&M Management Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge, after due inquiry:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)-15 or 15(d)-15 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.
 
 Date:July 13, 2011
/s/ Marc N. TealMarc. N. TealPrincipal Financial Officer
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2012133EN.01002401.xml

| 5.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 133/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 133/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 27 March 2012 — Armani v OHIM — Del Prete (AJ AMICI JUNIOR)

(Case T-420/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark AJ AMICI JUNIOR - Earlier national figurative mark AJ ARMANI JEANS - Earlier national word mark ARMANI JUNIOR - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2012/C 133/46

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Giorgio Armani SpA (Milan, Italy) (represented by: M. Rapisardi, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Mannucci, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Annunziata Del Prete (Naples, Italy) (represented by: R. Bocchini, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 July 2010 (Case R 1360/2009-2), relating to opposition proceeding between Giorgio Armani SpA and Ms Annunziata Del Prete

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 8 July 2010 (Case R 1360/2009-2); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 8 July 2010 (Case R 1360/2009-2);

| 2. | Orders OHIM and Ms Annunziata Del Prete to each pay half of the costs incurred by Giorgio Armani SpA before the Board of Appeal; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders OHIM and Ms Annunziata Del Prete to each pay half of the costs incurred by Giorgio Armani SpA before the Board of Appeal;

| 3. | Orders OHIM and Ms Del Prete to bear their own costs and to each pay half of the costs incurred by Giorgio Armani before the Court. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders OHIM and Ms Del Prete to bear their own costs and to each pay half of the costs incurred by Giorgio Armani before the Court.

---

(1)  OJ C 301, 6.11.2010.

1

---
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration
 Petitions have been filed with the Secretary of Labor under Section 221 (a) of the Trade Act of 1974 (“the Act”) and are identified in the Appendix to this notice. Upon receipt of these petitions, the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Employment and Training Administration, has instituted investigations pursuant to Section 221 (a) of the Act. The purpose of each of the investigations is to determine whether the workers are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Title II, Chapter 2, of the Act. The investigations will further relate, as appropriate, to the determination of the date on which total or partial separations began or threatened to begin and the subdivision of the firm involved. The petitioners or any other persons showing a substantial interest in the subject matter of the investigations may request a public hearing, provided such request is filed in writing with the Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown below, not later than March 21, 2011. Interested persons are invited to submit written comments regarding the subject matter of the investigations to the Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, at the address shown below, not later than March 21, 2011. The petitions filed in this case are available for inspection at the Office of the Director, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance, Employment and Training Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, Room N-5428, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. Signed at Washington, DC this 3rd day of March 2011. Elliott S. Kushner, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
 Appendix
[6 TAA petitions instituted between 2/22/11 and 2/25/11]
TA-W
Subject firm (petitioners)
Location
Date of
                             institution
Date of
                             petition80005
Abbott Laboratories (Company)
South Pasadena, CA
02/22/11
02/18/1180006
Mitel, Inc. (Workers)
Chandler, AZ
02/22/11
02/18/1180007
Specialty Shearing and Dyeing Inc. (Company)
Greenville, SC
02/22/11
02/21/1180008
Twin County Ford (Workers)
Woodlawn, VA
02/23/11
02/22/1180009
Carstone Industries, Inc. (Company)
Somerset, KY
02/23/11
02/22/1180010
Durham Manufacturing Company (Company)
Durham, CT
02/24/11
02/23/11


[FR Doc. 2011-5472 Filed 3-9-11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
AUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JULY 31 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                          3,159
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  82,995<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                    73,633
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              180,202
<PP&E>                                        228,093<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                453,821
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         115,173
<BONDS>                                       225,031
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          184
<OTHER-SE>                                     81,373
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  453,821
<SALES>                                       665,497
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              665,497
<CGS>                                         570,523
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 570,523
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               82,216
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             17,782
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (5,024)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      923
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (5,947)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (3,158)
<CHANGES>                                     (1,620)
<NET-INCOME>                                 (10,725)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.59)
<FN>
<F1>  Notes and accounts receivable - trade are reported net of allowances for
      doubtful accounts.
<F2>  Property, plant, and equipment is reported net of accumulated depreciation
      in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
</FN>



</TABLE>
# C_2011145EN.01002702.xml

| 14.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 145/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 145/27

---

Order of the General Court of 21 March 2011 — Milux v OHIM (REFLUXCONTROL and Others)

(Joined Cases T-139/10, T-280/10 to T-285/10 and T-349/10 to T-352/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Representation of the applicant by a lawyer who is not a third party - Inadmissibility)

2011/C 145/46

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Milux Holding SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: J. Bojs, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Schäffner, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Actions against the decisions of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 13 January 2010 (Case R 1134/2009-4), concerning the application for registration of the word sign REFLUXCONTROL as a Community trade mark (Case T-139/10); of 29 April 2010 (Case R 1432/2009-4), concerning the application for registration of the word sign ANEURYSMCONTROL as a Community trade mark (Case T-280/10); of 29 April 2010 (Case R 1433/2009-4), concerning the application for registration of the word sign APPETITECONTROL as a Community trade mark (Case T-281/10); of 8 June 2010 (Case R 1434/2009-4), concerning the application for registration of the word sign STOMACONTROL as a Community trade mark (Case T-282/10); of 17 June 2010 (Case R 1435/2009-4), concerning the application for registration of the word sign BMICONTROL as a Community trade mark (Case T-283/10); of 3 June 2010 (Case R 1438/2009-4), concerning the application for registration of the word sign IMPLANTCONTROL as a Community trade mark (Case T-284/10); of 29 April 2010 (Case R 1444/2009-4), concerning the application for registration of the word sign CHEMOCONTROL as a Community trade mark (Case T-285/10); of 29 June 2010 (Case R 1436/2009-4), concerning the application for registration of the word sign OVUMCONTROL as a Community trade mark (Case T-349/10); of 2 July 2010 (Case R 1437/2009-4), concerning the application for registration of the word sign HEARTCONTROL as a Community trade mark (Case T-350/10); of 28 July 2010 (Case R 1439/2009-4), concerning the application for registration of the word sign VESICACONTROL as a Community trade mark (Case T-351/10); and of 28 July 2010 (Case R 1443/2009-4), concerning the application for registration of the word sign RECTALCONTROL as a Community trade mark (Case T-352/10)

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | Cases T-139/10, T-280/10 to T-285/10 and T-349/10 to T-352/10 are joined for the purposes of the present order. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Cases T-139/10, T-280/10 to T-285/10 and T-349/10 to T-352/10 are joined for the purposes of the present order.

| 2. | The actions are dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The actions are dismissed as inadmissible.

| 3. | Milux Holding SA is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Milux Holding SA is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 148, 5.6.2010.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                          5
<MULTIPLIER>                                       1
<CURRENCY>                                         U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                       JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                    1
<CASH>                                                 364,516
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        1,729,821
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                          5,818,234
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     8,450,278
<PP&E>                                               1,629,936
<DEPRECIATION>                                        (905,302)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       9,310,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                1,673,564
<BONDS>                                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                             3,539,259
<OTHER-SE>                                           4,097,477
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         9,310,300
<SALES>                                              5,313,402
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     5,313,402
<CGS>                                                4,507,380
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        4,507,380
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     1,217,660
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      30,168
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (331,321)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (331,321)
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                          (331,321)
<EPS-BASIC>                                            (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            (0.05)



</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                                       
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement 
(Form S-8 No. 333-23313) pertaining to the Canmax Inc. Stock Option Plan and 
the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-33523) pertaining to 863,364 
shares of Canmax, Inc. common stock, of our report dated January 20, 1999, 
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Canmax Inc. included 
in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended October 31, 1998.


                                       /s/ King Griffin & Adamson P.C.

                                       King Griffin & Adamson P.C.


Dallas, Texas
January 29, 1999
# C_2010234EN.01005802.xml

| 28.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/58

---

Action brought on 26 May 2010 — Arango Jaramillo and Others v EIB

(Case F-34/10)

()

2010/C 234/107

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Oscar Orlando Arango Jaramillo (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) and Others (represented by: B. Cortese, C. Cortese and F. Spitaleri, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Investment Bank

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the EIB’s decisions to increase the applicants’ contributions to the pension system and compensation for the non-material harm suffered by them.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | annul the decisions of the EIB relating to the applicants’ salary slips for February 2010, which increase the applicants’ contributions to the pension system, through the increase of the basis for calculation (the salary subject to deduction) of those contributions on the one hand, and of the coefficient for calculation, expressed as a percentage of that salary subject to deduction, on the other; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decisions of the EIB relating to the applicants’ salary slips for February 2010, which increase the applicants’ contributions to the pension system, through the increase of the basis for calculation (the salary subject to deduction) of those contributions on the one hand, and of the coefficient for calculation, expressed as a percentage of that salary subject to deduction, on the other;

| — | order the Bank to pay a symbolic EUR 1, by way of compensation for the non-material harm suffered by the applicants; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Bank to pay a symbolic EUR 1, by way of compensation for the non-material harm suffered by the applicants;

| — | order the European Investment Bank to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Investment Bank to pay the costs.

---