alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Maxine Adams and Cecil Adams v. Rebecca Ross

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 1

- 00 552

- CV

Trial court case number: 20 10

- 12207

Trial court: 26 9th District Court of Harris County

Date motion filed: August 19 , 2013

Party filing motion: Appellant s

It is ordered that all relief requested in appellants’ “Motion for Reconsideration for Order

of Dimissal [sic] and Judgement [sic] for Costs Motion [sic] for New Trial on All Issues on

AppealMotion [sic] to Vacate Void Judgment and Motion for a New Trial” is denied

.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Justice s J ennings, Brown, and Huddle

Date: August 28, 2013
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Seeks Applications for Loans and Grants to Expand Access to New and 

Better Markets for Rural Small Business Owners and Entrepreneurs

WASHINGTON, Sept. 14, 2023 – The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) today announced that USDA 

is accepting applications for loans and grants to expand access to new and better markets for rural small 

business owners and microentrepreneurs.

The Department is making approximately $29 million available in funding through the Rural Microentrepreneur 

Assistance Program (RMAP).

USDA provides RMAP funding to non-profits, Tribes, colleges and universities to create revolving loan fund

programs and support training and technical assistance for rural microentrepreneurs and microenterprises. Rural 

businesses with 10 or fewer full-time employees are eligible for loans and technical assistance.

USDA is particularly interested in applications that will advance Biden-Harris Administration priorities to: 

• Reduce climate pollution and increase resilience to the impacts of climate change through economic 

support to rural communities. 

• Ensure all rural residents have equitable access to Rural Development (RD) programs and benefits from 

RD-funded projects; and 

• Help rural communities recover economically through more and better market opportunities and through 

improved infrastructure.

Applications must be submitted to the USDA Rural Development State Office where the project is located no 

later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the following dates:

• First Quarter: Sept. 30, 2023

• Second Quarter: Dec. 31, 2023

• Third Quarter: March 31, 2024

• Fourth Quarter: June 30, 2024

Interested applicants are encouraged to contact their local USDA Rural Development State Office well in 

advance of the application deadline to ask questions about their project, the program or the application process.

Additional information is available on page 63054 of the Sept. 14, 2023, Federal Register.

To subscribe to USDA Rural Development updates, visit GovDelivery subscriber page.

###

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender.
# C_2007095EN.01004203.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/42

---

Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 26 February 2007 — Icuna.Com v Parliament

(Case T-383/06 R)

(Interim measures - Application for suspension of operation of a decision - No need to adjudicate)

(2007/C 95/87)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Icuna.Com SCRL (Braîne-le-Château, Belgium) (represented by: J. Windey and P. Bandt, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: O. Caisou-Rousseau and M. Ecker, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Application for interim measures seeking, in substance, suspension of operation of the decision of the European Parliament dated 1 December 2006 accepting the tender submitted by Mostra and rejecting the applicant's tender in the context of call for tenders EP/DGINFO/WEBTV/2006/2003 and also of the implementation of any contract entered into with Mostra, pending the decision of the Court in the main action.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for interim measures. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for interim measures.

| 2. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Costs are reserved.

---
§ 93.424 Import permits and applications for inspection of ruminants. ( a ) For ruminants intended for importation from Mexico, the importer shall first apply for and obtain from APHIS an import permit as provided in § 93.404: *Provided, that:* An import permit is not required for sheep or goats imported for immediate slaughter if the animal is offered for entry at a land border port designated in § 93.403(c).
( b ) For ruminants intended for importation into the United States from Mexico the importer or his or her agent shall deliver to the veterinary inspector at the port of entry an application, in writing, for inspection, so that the veterinary inspector and customs representatives may make mutual satisfactory arrangements for the orderly inspection of the animals. The veterinary inspector at the port of entry will provide the importer or his or her agent with a written statement assigning a date when the animals may be presented for import inspection.
[55 FR 31495, Aug. 2, 1990, as amended at 60 FR 13898, 13900, Mar. 15, 1995. Redesignated and amended at 56012, 56019, Oct. 28, 1997; 68 FR 35534, June 16, 2003; 85 FR 57952, Sept. 17, 2020, 86 FR 68859, Dec. 3, 2021]
### §1165. Protection of the public interest

In applying sections 1166, 1167, 1169, 1170, 1171, 1172, 1173, and 1174 of this title, the court and the trustee shall consider the public interest in addition to the interests of the debtor, creditors, and equity security holders.

(Pub. L. 95–598, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2641.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

#### legislative statements

Section 1165 of the House amendment represents a modification of sections 1165 and 1167 of the Senate amendment requiring the court and the trustee to consider the broad, general public interest in addition to the interests of the debtor, creditors, and equity security holders in applying specific sections of the subchapter.

#### senate report no. 95–989

Section 1165 requires the court, in consideration of the relief to be granted upon the filing of an involuntary petition, to take into account the "public interest" in the preservation of the debtor's rail service. This is an important factor in railroad reorganization, which distinguishes them from other business reorganizations. Hence, this section modifies the provisions in sections 303 and 305 that govern generally when the business of a debtor may continue to operate, when relief under the Act sought should be granted, and when the petition should be dismissed.

Section 1167 [enacted as section 1165] imposes on the trustee the obligations, in addition to his other duties and responsibilities, to take into account the "public interest" in the preservation of the debtor's rail service.
#### §§ 201.213-201.214 [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's 10-KSB for the fiscal year ending August 31, 1997 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                         426,174
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,335,325
<ALLOWANCES>                                   100,130
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,562,797
<PP&E>                                       2,714,181
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,167,738
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,847,027
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          767,889
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       671,552
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,073,968
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,847,027
<SALES>                                      5,665,185
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,665,185
<CGS>                                        2,261,413
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,261,413
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,368,838
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                89,650
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,378
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 67,141
<INCOME-TAX>                                    23,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             43,541
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    43,541
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
#### Michael J. Sagert, Respondent, v Vincent Garden et al., Appellants.

[823 NYS2d 723]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Edward D. Garni, J.), entered August 18, 2005 in a personal injury action. The order denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Now, upon reading the stipulation of discontinuance of action *1195signed by the attorneys for the parties and filed in the Onondaga County Clerk’s Office on September 11, 2006,

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation. Present—Hurlbutt, J.E, Scudder, Gorski and Green, JJ.
#### § 153.17 Effectiveness of Presidential Permit.

A Presidential Permit, once issued by the Commission, shall not be effective until it has been accepted by the highest authority of the Permittee, as indicated by Permittee's execution of a Testimony of Acceptance, and a certified copy of the accepted Presidential Permit and the executed Testimony of Acceptance has been filed with the Commission.
# C_2010346EN.01005402.xml

| 18.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 346/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 346/54

---

Action brought on 21 October 2010 — IDT Biologika v Commission

(Case T-503/10)

()

2010/C 346/106

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: IDT Biologika GmbH (Dessau-Roßlau, Germany) (represented by: R. Gross and T. Kroupa, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Delegation of the European Union to the Republic of Serbia of 10 August 2010 rejecting the tender submitted in respect of Lot No 1 by IDT Biologika GmbH in response to the call for tenders (reference EuropeAid/129809/C/SUP/RS) for the supply of rabies vaccines to the beneficiary Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Supply of the Republic of Serbia, and awarding the contract to a consortium of various firms led by ‘Biovet a.s.’; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Delegation of the European Union to the Republic of Serbia of 10 August 2010 rejecting the tender submitted in respect of Lot No 1 by IDT Biologika GmbH in response to the call for tenders (reference EuropeAid/129809/C/SUP/RS) for the supply of rabies vaccines to the beneficiary Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Supply of the Republic of Serbia, and awarding the contract to a consortium of various firms led by ‘Biovet a.s.’;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant challenges the European Commission’s decision of 10 August 2010 to choose a tenderer other than the applicant in the context of a call for tenders for the supply of rabies vaccines (publication reference EuropeAid/129809/C/SUP/RS).

In support of its claim, the applicant alleges infringement of Article 252(3) of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002, (1) in that the chosen tender does not satisfy the technical requirements specified in the tender dossier with regard to the requisite non-virulence to humans of the vaccines offered or with regard to the requisite authorisations and should, therefore, necessarily have been disregarded.

1

Further, the applicant alleges infringement of the principles of equal treatment and transparency under Article 89(1) of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002, (2) since the applicant’s tender alone satisfies all the requirements with regard to the technical specifications and yet another tender was chosen.

2

---

(1)  Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 of 23 December 2002 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (OJ 2002 L 357, p. 1).

1

(2)  Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (OJ 2002 L 248, p. 1).

2

---
Exhibit 10.16

BASE SALARIES FOR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

OF

C&F FINANCIAL CORPORATION

The following are the base salaries (on an annual basis) in effect as of January 1, 2011 of the named executive officers of C&F Financial Corporation:



|                                                                                   |  |   |         | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | - | ------- | 
|Larry G. DillonChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer                     |  | $ | 268,000 | 
|                                                                                   | 
|Thomas F. CherryExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary    |  | $ | 220,000 | 
|                                                                                   | 
|Bryan E. McKernonPresident and Chief Executive Officer of C&F Mortgage Corporation |  | $ | 195,000 |
### §62. Additional statistics

This subchapter does not restrict or limit the Secretary in the collection and publication, under the general authority of the Secretary, of such statistics on fats and oils or products thereof not specifically required in this subchapter, as he deems to be in the public interest.

(Aug. 31, 1954, ch. 1158, 68 Stat. 1018.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 13, U.S.C., 1952 ed., §85 (Aug. 7, 1916, ch. 274, §5, as added July 25, 1947, ch. 331, 61 Stat. 457).

References to the Secretary (of Commerce) were substituted for reference to the Director of the Census and for reference to the Bureau (of the Census), to conform with 1950 Reorganization Plan No. 5, §§1, 2, effective May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1263. See Revision Note to section 4 of this title.

Changes were made in phraseology.
### §§2004 to 2010. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–272, §7(b), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1379

Section 2004, Pub. L. 92–513, title V, §504, as added Pub. L. 94–163, title III, §301, Dec. 22, 1975, 89 Stat. 908, related to judicial review of rules prescribed under section 2001, 2002, 2003, or 2006 of this title. See section 32909 of Title 49, Transportation.

Section 2005, Pub. L. 92–513, title V, §505, as added Pub. L. 94–163, title III, §301, Dec. 22, 1975, 89 Stat. 908; amended Pub. L. 96–425, §3(b), Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1822, related to fuel economy information and reports to be filed by manufacturers. See sections 32907 and 32910 of Title 49.

Section 2006, Pub. L. 92–513, title V, §506, as added Pub. L. 94–163, title III, §301, Dec. 22, 1975, 89 Stat. 910; amended Pub. L. 95–619, title IV, §§401(a), 403(a), (b), Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3254, 3256, 3257; Pub. L. 100–494, §8(a), Oct. 14, 1988, 102 Stat. 2452; Pub. L. 102–486, title IV, §403(3), (4), Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 2876, related to fuel economy labeling. See section 32908 of Title 49.

Section 2007, Pub. L. 92–513, title V, §507, as added Pub. L. 94–163, title III, §301, Dec. 22, 1975, 89 Stat. 911; amended Pub. L. 96–425, §6(a), Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1826, related to unlawful conduct under this subchapter. See section 32911 of Title 49.

Section 2008, Pub. L. 92–513, title V, §508, as added Pub. L. 94–163, title III, §301, Dec. 22, 1975, 89 Stat. 911; amended Pub. L. 95–619, title IV, §402, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3255; Pub. L. 96–425, §§6(c), 8(f), Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1827, 1829, related to civil penalty for violation of section 2007 of this title. See sections 32909 and 32911 to 32915 of Title 49.

Section 2009, Pub. L. 92–513, title V, §509, as added Pub. L. 94–163, title III, §301, Dec. 22, 1975, 89 Stat. 914, prohibited any State or local government from making laws or regulations relating to fuel economy standards or disclosures, except for automobiles procured for its own use. See section 32919 of Title 49.

Section 2010, Pub. L. 92–513, title V, §510, as added Pub. L. 94–163, title III, §301, Dec. 22, 1975, 89 Stat. 915, related to use of fuel efficient passenger automobiles by Federal Government. See section 32917 of Title 49.
Editorial Note on Part 28
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 28 appear at 76 FR 76873, Dec. 9, 2011.

§ 28.57 Public hearings. ( a ) Hearings shall be open to the public. However, the administrative judge at their discretion, may order a hearing or any part thereof closed, where to do so would be in the best interests of the petitioner, a witness, the public, or other affected persons. Any order closing the hearing shall set forth the reasons for the administrative judge's decision. Any objections thereto shall be made a part of the record.
( b ) At the hearing, the petitioner, the petitioner's representative, GAO's legal representative, and a GAO management representative, who is not expected to testify, each have a right to be present. The Agency management representative shall be designated prior to the hearing.
[58 FR 61992, Nov. 23, 1993, as amended at 68 FR 69301, Dec. 12, 2003; 89 FR 51399, June 18, 2024 ]
#### § 111.46 How will the respondent be notified of actions taken by the Commission and the reviewing officer?

If a statement designating counsel has been filed in accordance with 11 CFR 111.23, all notifications and other communications to a respondent provided for in subpart B of this part will be sent to designated counsel. If a statement designating counsel has not been filed, all notifications and other communications to a respondent provided for in subpart B of this part will be sent to respondent political committee and its treasurer at the political committee's address as listed in the most recent Statement of Organization, or amendment thereto, filed with the Commission in accordance with 11 CFR 102.2.

[68 FR 12580, Mar. 17, 2003]
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

December 4, 2007

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

PUBLISH

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

GUADALUPE ALBERTO

GARCIA-LARA, JR., also known as

Jose Perez-Gonzales, also known as

Armando Preciado-Ramirez,

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 06-3054

ORDER

Before TACHA, Chief Circuit Judge, KELLY, HENRY, BRISCOE, LUCERO,

MURPHY, HARTZ, O’BRIEN, McCONNELL, TYMKOVICH, GORSUCH,

and HOLMES, Circuit Judges.

Defendant-Appellee’s petition for rehearing, or, in the alternative, to abate

decision on rehearing pending the decision of the Supreme Court in Gall v.

United States, No. 07-7949, is denied by the panel. Judge Lucero votes to grant

rehearing, or, in the alternative, to abate decision on rehearing pending the

decision in Gall.

The petition for rehearing en banc was transmitted to all of the judges of
-2-

the court who are in regular active service. A poll was requested and Judges

Briscoe, Lucero, Murphy, and O’Brien voted to grant rehearing. Judges Briscoe,

Lucero, Murphy, O’Brien, and Tymkovich voted in the alternative to abate

decision on rehearing en banc pending Gall. 

The petition is therefore denied.

Entered for the Court

ELISABETH A. SHUMAKER, Clerk
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 23

- 00593

- CR

Thomas Carl Norman v. The State of Texas
On Appeal from the 24th District Court of Jackson County , Texas Trial Cause No. 2304

- 11441

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed in part and reversed in part, and the cause remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED IN PART and REVERSED and REMANDED IN PART, and the case i s REMANDED for further proceedings in accordance with its opinion

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. August 15, 2024
# C_2012303EN.01002106.xml

| 6.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/21

---

Order of the President of the Court of 8 May 2012 — ThyssenKrupp AG v European Commission

(Case C-506/11 P) (1)

1

2012/C 303/41

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 347, 26.11.2011.

1

---
#### § 590.400 Form of certificates.

All certificates shall be issued on forms approved by the Administrator.
Together, America Prospers

Tribal College Initiative Grants

What does this 

program do?

This program provides funding 

to 1994 Land Grant Institutions 

(Tribal Colleges) to make 

capital improvements to their 

educational facilities and to 

purchase equipment.

Who may apply 

for this program?

Tribal Colleges as listed in 

Section 7402 of the Agricultural 

Act of 2014.

How may funds be used? 

Funds can be used by Tribal Colleges 

for infrastructure improvements, to 

purchase equipment and to develop 

essential community facilities. 

Eligible community facilities 

projects include:

• Schools

• Education equipment

• Libraries

• Dorms

• Renovation and improvements

• Vehicles and major equipment

• Education and cultural projects

How do we get started?

• Applications for this program are 

accepted through your local office

year round 

• Program resources are available 

online (includes forms, guidance, 

and certifications) 

Who can answer questions?

• Contact your local office.

What governs this program?

• This program is authorized by 

7 U.S.C. 1926

• Code of Federal Regulation, 

7 CFR 3570 Subpart B

• RD Instruction 3570-B

NOTE: Because citations and other information may be subject to change, 

please always consult the program instructions listed in the section above 

titled “What Governs This Program?” You may also contact your local office for 

assistance. You will find additional forms, resources, and program information at 

rd.usda.gov. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Last Updated January 2020