alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013009EN.01001402.xml

| 12.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 9/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/14

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 November 2012 (references for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeitsgericht Passau — Germany) — Alexander Heimann (C-229/11), Konstantin Toltschin (C-230/11) v Kaiser GmbH,

(Joined Cases C-229/11 and C-230/11) (1)

1

(Social policy - Directive 2003/88/EC - Short-time working (‘Kurzarbeit’) - Reduction of paid annual leave on the basis of short-time working - Allowance in lieu)

2013/C 9/21

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Arbeitsgericht Passau

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Alexander Heimann (C-229/11), Konstantin Toltschin (C-230/11)

Applicants:

Defendant: Kaiser GmbH,

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

References for a preliminary ruling — Arbeitsgericht Passau — Interpretation of Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights (OJ 2010 C 83, p. 389) and of Article 7(1) of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time (OJ 2003 L 299, p. 9) — Reduction in the usual hours worked in the undertaking, as a result of short-time working (‘Kurzarbeit’) — National legislation providing for a reduced entitlement to paid annual leave on the basis of the reduction in the number of working days under short-time working

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and Article 7(1) of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time must be interpreted as meaning that they do not preclude national legislation or practice, such as a social plan agreed between an undertaking and its works council, under which the paid annual leave of a worker on short-time working is calculated according to the pro rata temporis rule.

---

(1)  OJ C 269, 10.9.2011.

1

---
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

As registered independent publicaccountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report, dated March 28, 2008, included in this Form 10-K, into the Company’s previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-12411, 333-93201,333-72648, 333-85246, 333-108167, 333-114304, 333-135972 and 333-143980) and the Company’s previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-143091, 333-121915 and 333-106033). 

/s/ Vitale, Caturano & Company, Ltd. 

VITALE, CATURANO &COMPANY, LTD. 

March 28, 2008 

Boston, Massachusetts
# C_2010328EN.01003003.xml

| 4.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/30

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 19 October 2010 — Nencini v Parliament

(Case T-431/10 R)

(Interim measures - Member of the European Parliament - Recovery of allowances paid in reimbursement of parliamentary assistance expenses and of travel costs - Application for stay of execution - Lack of urgency)

2010/C 328/52

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Riccardo Nencini (Barberino di Mugello, Italy) (represented by: F. Bertini, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: N. Lorens, A. Caiola and D. Moore, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for stay of execution of a number of acts of the Parliament relating to the recovery of parliamentary allowances wrongly received

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | Costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Costs are reserved.

---
<Page>
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
                            ------------------------


                                     FORM 8-K


                                  CURRENT REPORT



                       Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
                       the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


    Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):  October 16, 2002
                                                       ----------------

                                       0-17080
                              (Commission File Number)
                              ------------------------

                               UNITRONIX CORPORATION
                               ---------------------
              (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)


                                     NEW JERSEY
                                     ----------
          (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)


                                     22-2086851
-                                -----------------
)                                (I.R.S. Employer
                                Identification No.)


     One Newbury Street, Peabody, MA                           01960
     -------------------------------                           -----
  (Address of Principal Executive Offices)                    (Zip Code)


      Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (978) 535-3912
                                                          --------------


                                       N/A
                                       ---
                                  Former Address







<Page>


                             UNITRONIX CORPORATI0N


ITEM 5. OTHER EVENTS.

Unitronix Corporation issued the press release attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1
on October 16, 2002.

ITEM 7.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS

        (c) Exhibits

            99.1 Press Release of Unitronix Corporation dated October 16, 2002.

                                  SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                            UNITRONIX CORPORATION
                                            (Registrant)


Date:  October 22, 2002                  /s/William C. Wimer
       ----------------                  -------------------
                                            William C. Wimer
                                            Vice President of Operations &
                                               Chief Financial Officer

<Page>


                                 EXHIBIT INDEX

       EXHIBIT
        NUMBER        DESCRIPTION
        ------        -----------
         99.1         Press Release of Unitronix Corporation dated
                      October 16, 2002
### §207. Preparation of standards by Secretary of Commerce

The Secretary of Commerce is authorized and required to prepare suitable standards in accordance with section 206 of this title.

(Mar. 3, 1893, ch. 221, §2, 27 Stat. 746; Feb. 14, 1903, ch. 552, §10, 32 Stat. 829; Mar. 4, 1913, ch. 141, §1, 37 Stat. 736.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Act Mar. 4, 1913, created Department of Labor, and renamed Department of Commerce and Labor as Department of Commerce.

#### Transfer of Functions

Act Feb. 14, 1903, transferred National Bureau of Standards from Treasury Department to Department of Commerce and Labor.
§ 351.9 Charges for examinations. ( a ) The fees to be charged and collected by the Administrator for examination shall be at the rates specified in §§ 391.2, 391.3, and 391.4 respectively for base time; for overtime including Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays, as provided for in § 351.14; and for certain laboratory services which are not covered under the base time, overtime, and/or holiday costs and which are required to determine the eligibility of any technical animal fat for certification under the regulations in this Part. Such fees shall be charged for the time required to render such service, including, but not limited to, the time required for the travel of the inspector or inspectors in connection therewith.
( b ) Charges may also be made to cover the actual cost of travel and per diem allowance at rates currently allowed by the General Services Administration, and other expenses incurred by the Department in connection with such examinations and laboratory service.
[40 FR 58627, Dec. 18, 1975, as amended at 53 FR 13397, Apr. 22, 1988; 54 FR 6389, Feb. 10, 1989]
Exhibit 31.aI, John P. Manning, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.;2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date:    July 16, 2007 /s/ John P. Manning   John P. Manning   Principal Executive Officer
# C_2011013EN.01003301.xml

| 15.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/33

---

Action brought on 8 November 2010 — Hell Energy v OHIM — Hansa Mineralbrunnen (HELL)

(Case T-522/10)

()

2011/C 13/63

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Hell Energy Magyarország kft (Budapest, Hungary) (represented by: M. Treis, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Hansa Mineralbrunnen GmbH (Rellingen, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 5 August 2010 in case R 1517/2009-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 5 August 2010 in case R 1517/2009-1;

| — | Allow the registration of the Community trade mark application No 5937107; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Allow the registration of the Community trade mark application No 5937107; and

| — | Order the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to bear the costs of the current proceedings as well as those incurred by the applicant before the Board of Appeal and the Opposition Division. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to bear the costs of the current proceedings as well as those incurred by the applicant before the Board of Appeal and the Opposition Division.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘HELL’, for goods in class 32 — Community trade mark application No 5937107

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited: Community trade mark registration No 5135331 of the word mark ‘Hella’, for goods in class 32

Mark or sign cited:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: The applicant considers that the contested decision infringes Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal and the Opposition Division erred in their decisions in finding a likelihood of confusion.

Pleas in law:

---
**Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 14 December 2011 – Vuitton Malletier v OHIM – Friis Group International (Representation
of a locking device)**

**(Case T-237/10)**

Community trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – No distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009

Community trade mark – Surrender, revocation and invalidity – Absolute grounds of invalidity – Registration contrary to Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 – No distinctive character acquired through use (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Arts 7(1)(b) and (3), and 52(1)(a) and (2))
(see paras 22, 43, 46, 68, 70, 73, 75, 79, 81-82, 99-101)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 24 February 2010 (Case R 1590/2008-1) concerning invalidity proceedings between Friis Group International Aps and Louis Vuitton Malletier. |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 24 February 2010 (Case R 1590/2008-1) in so far as it declared Community trade mark number 3 693 116 invalid for ‘Jewellery, including rings, keyrings, buckles and earrings, cuff links, bracelets, trinkets, brooches, necklaces, ties pins, ornaments, medallions; horological and chronometric instruments and apparatus, including watches, watchcases, alarm clocks; nutcrackers in precious metals, their alloys or coated therewith, candlesticks in precious metals, their alloys or coated therewith’ in Class 14 and ‘leather and imitations of leather’ and ‘umbrellas’ in Class 18; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3. | | Orders Louis Vuitton Malletier, Friis Group International ApS and OHIM each to bear the costs they have incurred in the course of the proceeding before the General Court. |
### §3340. Time for proposal and adoption of standards

Appraisal standards established under this chapter shall be proposed not later than 6 months and shall be adopted in final form and become effective not later than 12 months after August 9, 1989.

(Pub. L. 101–73, title XI, §1111, Aug. 9, 1989, 103 Stat. 514.)
#### § 94.26 Gelatin derived from horses, swine, or non-bovine ruminants.

Gelatin derived from horses, swine, or non-bovine ruminants must be accompanied at the time of importation into the United States by an official certificate issued by a veterinarian employed by the national government of the region of origin. The official certificate must state the species of animal from which the gelatin is derived.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0453)

[86 FR 68862, Dec. 3, 2021]
# C_2010317EN.01004601.xml

| 20.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 317/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 317/46

---

Action brought on 28 September 2010 — Fuchshuber Agrarhandel v Commission

(Case T-451/10)

()

2010/C 317/81

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Fuchshuber Agrarhandel GmbH (Hörsching, Austria) (represented by: G. Lehner, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | conduct a hearing; |
| --- | --- |

—

conduct a hearing;

| — | order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the applicant within 14 days the sum of EUR 2 623 282,31, together with interest of 6 % per annum on the sum of EUR 1 641 372,50 Euro from 24 September 2007 and interest of 6 % per annum on the sum of EUR 981 909,81 from 16 October 2007; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the applicant within 14 days the sum of EUR 2 623 282,31, together with interest of 6 % per annum on the sum of EUR 1 641 372,50 Euro from 24 September 2007 and interest of 6 % per annum on the sum of EUR 981 909,81 from 16 October 2007;

| — | declare that the Commission of the European Communities is obliged to compensate the applicant for any further losses in connection with consignment KUK459 awarded on 3 September 2007 and consignment KUK465 awarded on 17 September 2007; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that the Commission of the European Communities is obliged to compensate the applicant for any further losses in connection with consignment KUK459 awarded on 3 September 2007 and consignment KUK465 awarded on 17 September 2007;

| — | rule that the Commission of the European Communities is to pay to the applicant’s lawyer the applicant’s costs within 14 days. |
| --- | --- |

—

rule that the Commission of the European Communities is to pay to the applicant’s lawyer the applicant’s costs within 14 days.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant seeks compensation for the loss which it states that it has incurred because certain quantities of the maize purchased by it in 2007 from the stocks of the Hungarian intervention agency in two tender procedures were missing from the relevant warehouses.

In the grounds of its application, the applicant submits inter alia that the Commission failed to exercise its supervisory powers over the Hungarian paying agency and also did not insist on observance of the Hungarian paying agency’s obligations. It further states that it would have suffered no loss if the Commission had, in law and in fact, laid down more stringent and more precise requirements and control mechanisms in relation to the warehouse keepers’ fitness and reliability, to the suitability of the storage locations, and to stock surveys in respect of, and the identification and storage of, the intervention goods.

---
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 15, 2019

No. 04-19-00416-CV

VILT AND ASSOCIATES, P.C. and Mediation Centers of America, L.L.C.,

Appellants

v.

Ho Kon PARKER and Richard T. Parker,

Appellees

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-CI-19561

Honorable Rosie Alvarado, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

By order dated October 14, 2019, we concluded we had jurisdiction over this appeal as a 

timely-filed restricted appeal and ordered appellants to file an amended brief framing their issues 

under the legal standards applicable to restricted appeals by November 13, 2019. On November 

8, 2019, appellees filed a response which appears to question our jurisdiction or alternatively to 

request an extension of time to file an appellees’ brief. On November 13, 2019, appellants filed 

their amended brief. 

Appellee’s brief must be filed no later than December 13, 2019. Appellees may raise any 

additional challenges to this court’s jurisdiction in their brief.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 15th day of November, 2019.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

Clerk of Court
# C_2011013EN.01003802.xml

| 15.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/38

---

Action brought on 22 September 2010 — Nolin v Commission

(Case F-82/10)

()

2011/C 13/74

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Michel Nolin (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: M. Velardo, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Application for the annulment of the applicant’s salary adjustment slip for the period from July to December 2009 and the salary slip of 1 January 2010 issued within the framework of the annual adjustment of the remuneration and pensions of officials and other servants pursuant to Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1296/2009 of 23 December 2009.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the applicant’s salary slip RG/2009 and his salary slip of 01/2010; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the applicant’s salary slip RG/2009 and his salary slip of 01/2010;

| — | order the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Commission to pay the costs.

---
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 4 A1 71 5 . CARRUTHERS v . LAKEVI EW LOAN SERVI CI NG, LLC et a l

.

Th e ab o v e-s t y l ed ap p eal was d o ck et ed i n t hi s Co u rt o n J un e 2 1

, 2 02 4

. Pu rs u an t

t o Ru l e 2 3 (a) o f th e Co u rt o f Ap p eal s t h e b ri ef o f t h e A p p el lan t was t o b e fi l ed i n t h i s

Co u rt b y J u l y 1 1

, 20 2 4

. As o f t h e d at e o f t h i s ord er, t h e Ap p el lan t has n o t fi led a b ri ef

o r a m ot i o n fo r ex t en si o n o f t i m e t o fi l e a b ri ef.

Th i s ap p eal is h ereb y DISM ISSED. See Co u rt o f Ap p eal s Ru les 1 6 (b ), 2 3 (a).

C o u r t o f A p p e a ls o f t h e S t a t e o f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O ffic e

, A t la n t a

,

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

I c e r t ify t ha t t h e a b o v e is a t

r u e e x t r a c t fr o m

t h e m in u t e s o f t h e C o u r t o f A pp e a ls o f G e o r g ia

.

W it n e s s m y s ig n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o f s a id c o u r t

h e r e t o a ffix e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r la s t a b o v e w r

it t e n

.

, C le r

k

. July 16, 2024

07/16/2024