alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      18,588,583
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  420,984
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    251,788
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,645,778
<PP&E>                                         423,158
<DEPRECIATION>                                 124,738
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,229,454
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          499,721
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,215
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,719,523
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,229,459
<SALES>                                        841,942
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               866,942
<CGS>                                          884,229
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  884,229
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,524,416
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,034,879)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,034,879)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,034,879)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.45)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>UNAUDITED PRO FORMA NET LOSS PER SHARE
</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Jupiter Marine
International Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal
period ending January 26, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carl Herndon, Principal
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


By: /s/ Carl Herndon
    ----------------
    Carl Herndon
    Principal Executive Officer
    April 9, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the first
quarter 10-QSB for the fiscal year ending August 31, 1997 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                              448,426
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                     1,332,363
<ALLOWANCES>                        105,114
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  2,319,211
<PP&E>                            2,410,675
<DEPRECIATION>                      964,130
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    4,518,631
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               578,742
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                            665,636
<OTHER-SE>                        2,923,881
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      4,518,631
<SALES>                           1,204,897
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  1,204,897
<CGS>                               555,649
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       555,649
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    817,474
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     18,200
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    5,923
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (156,409)
<INCOME-TAX>                            800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (157,209)
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                       (157,209)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                          (.01)
        

</TABLE>
#### § 590.840 Identification of inedible, unwholesome, or adulterated egg products.

All inedible, unwholesome, or adulterated egg products shall be identified with the name and address of the processor, the words “Inedible Egg Products—Not To Be Used as Human Food.”
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       2,426,032
<SECURITIES>                                 4,064,321
<RECEIVABLES>                                  587,991
<ALLOWANCES>                                    32,000
<INVENTORY>                                    426,489
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               190,667
<PP&E>                                       1,178,566
<DEPRECIATION>                                 530,937
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,714,733
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          901,791
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,906
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,802,036
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,714,733
<SALES>                                      2,096,853
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,096,853
<CGS>                                        1,848,155
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,848,155
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,348,237
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,537,085)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,537,085)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,537,085)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  ($0.61)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  ($0.61)
        

</TABLE>
#### State of Connecticut *v.*George L. Clements

House, C. J., Shapiro, Loiselle, MacDonald and Bogdanski, Js.

Argued January 2

decision released February 26, 1974

*Gary J. Friedman,*with whom, on the brief, was *Arthur Levy, Jr.,*for the appellant (defendant).

*Walter D. Flanagan,*assistant state’s attorney, with whom, on the brief, were *Donald A. Browne,*state’s attorney, and *Bichard F. Jacobson,*assistant state’s attorney, for the appellee (state).

Per Curiam.

On a trial to a jury the defendant was found guilty on a count of rape in violation of General Statutes § 53-238 and on a count of kidnapping in violation of § 53-27. The court denied Ms motion to set aside the verdict and judgment was entered on the verdict as rendered. The defendant has appealed, claiming error in relation to a portion of the court’s charge to the jury, in a ruling on evidence, in its refusal to find certain facts claimed to be admitted and undisputed and in denying his motion for a directed verdict.

We find no merit whatsoever to the appeal. There is notMng in the record to indicate error in the charge to the jury, in the ruling on evidence or in the finding made by the court. Neither does the *97record indicate that the verdict returned was not reasonably reached on a proper consideration of the evidence.

We are constrained to discuss one further matter. In the defendant’s brief an attack is made upon the public defender who represented him at the trial. The claim is asserted by the defendant through private counsel who now represent the defendant on this appeal that the public defender afforded him inadequate representation which prejudiced his right to a fair trial. When the appeal was argued before this court, counsel for the defendant stated that he was withdrawing this claim. Nevertheless, such a charge, if unfounded, is one not to be made frivolously. Unless such a claim, as appears in the defendant’s brief, is made with serious intent and is based upon valid grounds, better judgment would dictate and the honor of the profession would require that the matter not be raised in the first instance.

There is no error.
### §1666b. Timing of payments

#### (a) Time to make payments

A creditor may not treat a payment on a credit card account under an open end consumer credit plan as late for any purpose, unless the creditor has adopted reasonable procedures designed to ensure that each periodic statement including the information required by section 1637(b) of this title is mailed or delivered to the consumer not later than 21 days before the payment due date.

#### (b) Grace period

If an open end consumer credit plan provides a time period within which an obligor may repay any portion of the credit extended without incurring an additional finance charge, such additional finance charge may not be imposed with respect to such portion of the credit extended for the billing cycle of which such period is a part, unless a statement which includes the amount upon which the finance charge for the period is based was mailed or delivered to the consumer not later than 21 days before the date specified in the statement by which payment must be made in order to avoid imposition of that finance charge.

(Pub. L. 90–321, title I, §163, as added Pub. L. 93–495, title III, §306, Oct. 28, 1974, 88 Stat. 1514; amended Pub. L. 111–24, title I, §106(b)(1), May 22, 2009, 123 Stat. 1742; Pub. L. 111–93, §2, Nov. 6, 2009, 123 Stat. 2998.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2009—Pub. L. 111–24 amended section generally, adding provisions relating to late payments and delivery of periodic statements, substituting provisions requiring a 21-day statement delivery period for provisions requiring a 14-day period before the imposition of additional finance charges, and striking provisions relating to excusable cause for creditor's failure to make timely mailing or delivery of periodic statements.

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 111–93 inserted "a credit card account under" after "payment on".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 111–24, title I, §106(b)(2), May 22, 2009, 123 Stat. 1742, provided that: "Notwithstanding section 3 [see Effective Date of 2009 Amendment note set out under section 1602 of this title], section 163 of the Truth in Lending Act [15 U.S.C. 1666b], as amended by this subsection, shall become effective 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act [May 22, 2009]."
### SUBCHAPTER VII—PROHIBITION OF COMMERCIALIZATION OF WEATHER SATELLITES
#### Philip LaChapelle *v.*New Haven Board of Police Commissioners

*Anthony J. Lasala,*in support of the motion.

Submitted April 9

decided May 8, 1974

The defendant in the appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in New Haven County filed a “Motion for Permission to File Motion for an Order Striking Appellant’s Request for Finding and Draft Finding” and attached thereto a copy of his proposed motion. *We*have examined both motions and they are denied. It is noted that it is within the province of the trial court to determine, in the first instance, whether and to what extent a finding is necessary and appropriate. See *Wagner*v. *Zoning Board of Appeals,*158 Conn. 713, 714, 216 A.2d 182.
# C_2011030EN.01003001.xml

| 29.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/30

---

Action brought on 13 December 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Austria

(Case C-582/10)

()

2011/C 30/47

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: N. Yerrell and B. Schöfer, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Republic of Austria

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, by failing fully to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to transpose Directive 2008/68/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 September 2008 on the inland transport of dangerous goods (1) or fully to communicate such measures to the Commission, the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by failing fully to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to transpose Directive 2008/68/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 September 2008 on the inland transport of dangerous goods (1) or fully to communicate such measures to the Commission, the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | order the Republic of Austria to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Republic of Austria to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The time-limit for the transposition of Directive 2008/68/EC expired on 30 June 2009.

---

(1)  OJ 2008 L 260, p. 13.

1

---
§ 93.704 Import permit. ( a ) *General requirements.* No person may import a hedgehog or tenrec into the United States unless it is accompanied by an import permit issued by APHIS and is imported into the United States within 30 days after the proposed date of arrival stated in the import permit. The importer or his or her agent must notify the inspector at the port of first arrival of the date of arrival at least 72 hours before the hedgehog or tenrec arrives in the United States.
( b ) *Import permit required.* Any person who desires to import a hedgehog or tenrec must submit an application (VS Form 17-129) for an import permit. Applications are available from, Strategy and Policy, Veterinary Services, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, 4700 River Road, Riverdale, Maryland 20737; or by visiting *https://www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/resources/sa_epermits/eauth-epermits*. A separate application must be prepared for each shipment.
( c ) *Application for an import permit.* The importer must complete, sign, and date the application for an import permit, which must include the following information: ( 1 ) The name and address of the shipper in the region of origin of the hedgehog or tenrec intended for importation into the United States.
( 2 ) The name, address, and telephone number of the importer.
( 3 ) The port of embarkation.
( 4 ) The region from which the hedgehog or tenrec will be shipped to the United States.
( 5 ) The mode of transportation.
( 6 ) The number, breed, species, and descriptions of the hedgehogs or tenrecs to be imported.
( 7 ) The purpose of the importation.
( 8 ) The route of travel, including all carrier stops en route.
( 9 ) The proposed shipping and arrival dates.
( 10 ) The port of first arrival in the United States.
( 11 ) The name, mailing address, and telephone number of the person to whom the hedgehog or tenrec will be delivered in the United States.
( 12 ) The location of the place where delivery will be made in the United States.
( 13 ) Any remarks regarding the shipment.
( d ) *Issuance of an import permit.* Upon receipt of the application, APHIS will review the application. If the hedgehog or tenrec appears to be eligible to be imported into the United States, APHIS will issue an import permit indicating the applicable requirements under this subpart for the importation of the hedgehog or tenrec. Even though an import permit has been issued for the importation of a hedgehog or tenrec, the animal may enter the United States only if all other applicable requirements of this subpart have been met.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0040) [55 FR 31495, Aug. 2, 1990. Redesignated and amended at 62 FR 56012, 56021, Oct. 28, 1997; 81 FR 40151, June 21, 2016; 86 FR 45625, Aug. 16, 2021]
## Waste Management:
§ 93.437 Tuberculosis status of foreign regions. ( a ) *Level I regions.* APHIS considers certain regions of the world to have a program that meets APHIS requirements for tuberculosis classification in accordance with § 93.438, and a prevalence of tuberculosis in their domestic bovine herds of less than 0.001 percent over at least the previous 2 years (24 consecutive months).
( b ) *Level II regions.* APHIS considers certain regions of the world to have a program that meets APHIS requirements for tuberculosis classification in accordance with § 93.438, and a prevalence of tuberculosis in their domestic bovine herds equal to or greater than 0.001 percent, but less than 0.01 percent, over the previous 2 years (24 consecutive months).
( c ) *Level III regions.* APHIS considers certain regions of the world to have a program that meets APHIS requirements for tuberculosis classification in accordance with § 93.438, and a prevalence of tuberculosis in their domestic bovine herds equal to or greater than 0.01 percent, but less than 0.1 percent, over the previous year (12 consecutive months).
( d ) *Level IV regions.* APHIS considers certain regions of the world to have a program that meets APHIS requirements for tuberculosis classification in accordance with § 93.438, and a prevalence of tuberculosis in their domestic bovine herds equal to or greater than 0.1 percent, but less than 0.5 percent, over the previous year (12 consecutive months).
( e ) *Level V regions.* APHIS considers certain regions of the world not to have a program that meets APHIS requirements for tuberculosis classification in accordance with § 93.438, to have a prevalence of tuberculosis in their domestic bovine herds equal to or greater than 0.5 percent, or to be unassessed by APHIS with regard to tuberculosis.
( f ) *Listing of regions.* Lists of all Level I regions, Level II regions, Level III regions, Level IV regions, and Level V regions for tuberculosis are found online, at *http://www.aphis.usda.gov/import_export/animals/live_animals.shtml .* Changes to the lists will be made in accordance with § 93.438.
[85 FR 57953, Sept. 17, 2020]
§ 442.2 Definitions and procedures for determining net weight compliance. ( a ) For the purpose of § 442.1 of this part, the reasonable variations allowed, and the definitions and the procedures to be used, in determining net weight and net weight compliance are presented in the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Handbook 133, “Checking the Net Contents of Packaged Goods,” Fourth Edition, January 2005, which is incorporated by reference. The Director of the Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies of NIST Handbook 133 may be purchased from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, 732 N. Capitol Street, NW., Washington, DC, 20401. You may contact the Government Printing Office Toll-Free at 1-866-512-1800 or go to: *http://bookstore.gpo.gov .* You may inspect a copy of NIST Handbook 133 at the FSIS Docket Room, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Room 2534, Washington, DC 20250. You can contact the FSIS Docket room by calling 202-720-0344 or 202-720-3813. The NIST Handbook 133 is also available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .*
( b ) The following NIST Handbook 133 requirements are not incorporated by reference.
Chapter 2—Basic Test Procedure—Gravimetric Testing 2.3 Basic Test Procedure—Tare Procedures—*Wet Tare* 2.3 Basic Test Procedure—Moisture Allowances—*What moisture allowance is used with wet tare when testing packages bearing a USDA seal of inspection?* 2.4 Borax Chapter 3—Test Procedures—For Packages Labeled by Volume 3.5 Mayonnaise and Salad Dressing 3.7 Pressed and Blown Glass Tumblers and Stemware 3.8 Volumetric Test Procedures for Paint, Varnish, and Lacquers—Non Aerosol 3.9 Testing Viscous Materials—Such as Caulking Compounds and Pasters 3.10 Peat Moss 3.11 Mulch and Soils Labeled by Volume 3.12 Ice Cream Novelties 3.13 Fresh Oysters Labeled by Volume 3.14 Determining the Net Contents of Compressed Gas Cylinders 3.15 Volumetric Test Procedures for Packaged Firewood with a Labeled Volume of 133 L (4 Cu Ft) or Less 3.16 Boxed Firewood 3.17 Crosshatched Firewood 3.18 Bundles and Bags of Firewood Chapter 4—Test Procedures—Packages Labeled by Count, Linear Measure, Area, Thickness, and Combinations of Quantities 4.5 Paper Plates and Sanitary Paper Products 4.6 Special Test Requirements for Packages Labeled by Linear or Square Measure (Area) 4.7 Polyethylene sheeting 4.8 Packages Labeled by Linear or Square (Area) Measure 4.9 Bailer Twine—Test Procedure for Length 4.10 Procedure for Checking the Area Measurement of Chamois Appendix C Glossary—wet tare
Order filed, September 17, 2012

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 12

- 00445

- CV

____________ KERRY CARTER AND LET ONIA JACKSON

- CARTER , Appellant

V.
S.S. PROPERTIES LLP, SCOTT PIERCE AND SHI OW

- MINN PIERCE , Appellee

On A ppeal from the 333rd District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2009

- 24598



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due August 3, 2012

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the re cord. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Jodi Masera , the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order

. PER CURIAM
#### § 72.23 Cars or other vehicles having carried infested or exposed cattle in quarantined area shall be cleaned and treated.

Cars or others vehicles which have carried cattle exposed to or infested with ticks within the quarantined area of any State shall be cleaned and treated in the required concentration with a permitted dip listed in § 72.13 before being moved interstate under supervision of a State or Federal inspector or an accredited veterinarian.

[38 FR 21996, Aug. 15, 1973]
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Hersha Hospitality Trust (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jay H. Shah, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:







(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





May 5, 2011
/s/ Jay H. ShahJay H. ShahChief Executive Officer