alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1302.5 Assurances required. ( a ) TVA contributes financial assistance only under agreements which contain a provision which specifically requires compliance with this part in programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance from TVA. If the financial assistance involves the furnishing of real property, the agreement shall obligate the recipient, or in the case of a subsequent transfer, the transferee, for the period during which the real property is used for a purpose for which the financial assistance is extended or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits. Where the financial assistance involves the furnishing of personal property, the agreement shall obligate the recipient for the period during which the recipient retains ownership or possession of the property. In all other cases the agreement shall obligate the recipient for the period during which financial assistance is extended pursuant to the agreement. TVA shall specify the form of the foregoing agreements, and the extent to which an agreement shall be applicable to subgrantees, contractors and subcontractors, transferees, successors in interest, and other participants.
( b ) In the case of real property, structures or improvements thereon, or interests therein, which is acquired with Federal financial assistance, or in the case where Federal financial assistance is provided in the form of a transfer by TVA of real property or interest therein, the instrument effecting or recording the transfer of title shall contain a covenant running with the land assuring nondiscrimination for the period during which the real property is used for a purpose for which the Federal financial assistance is extended or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits. Where no transfer of property is involved, but property is improved with Federal financial assistance, the recipient shall agree to include such a covenant in any subsequent transfer of such property. Where the property is obtained by transfer from TVA, the covenant against discrimination may also include a condition coupled with a right to be reserved by TVA to revert title to the property in the event of a breach of the covenant where, in the discretion of TVA, such a condition and right of reverter is appropriate to the statute under which the real property is obtained and to the nature of the grant and the grantee. In such event if a transferee of real property proposes to mortgage or otherwise encumber the real property as security for financing construction of new, or improvement of existing, facilities on such property for the purposes for which the property was transferred, TVA may agree, upon request of the transferee and if necessary to accomplish such financing, and upon such conditions as it deems appropriate, to forbear the exercise of such right to revert title for so long as the lien of such mortgage or other encumbrance remains effective.
[30 FR 311, Jan. 9, 1965, as amended at 38 FR 17944, July 5, 1973. Redesignated at 44 FR 30682, May 29, 1979. Redesignated and amended at 49 FR 20481, May 15, 1984; 68 FR 51355, Aug. 26, 2003]
#### § 214.24 Forms.

Applications, leases, and other papers must be upon forms prepared by the department, and the superintendent of the Osage Indian school, Pawhuska, Okla., will furnish prospective lessees with such forms at a cost of $1 per set.

Form M. Application for mining lease, including financial showing.

Form N. Lease (except lead and zinc).

Form O. Bond.

Form P. Authority of officers to execute papers.

Form Q. Assignment.

Form R. Lease for lead and zinc.

Form S. Collective bond.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 603 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 603

 To amend the Financial Stability Act of 2010 to require the Financial 
 Stability Oversight Council to consider alternative approaches before 
 determining that a U.S. nonbank financial company shall be supervised 
by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 28, 2019

    Mr. Rounds (for himself, Mr. Jones, Mr. Tillis, and Ms. Sinema) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
            Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Financial Stability Act of 2010 to require the Financial 
 Stability Oversight Council to consider alternative approaches before 
 determining that a U.S. nonbank financial company shall be supervised 
by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Financial Stability Oversight 
Council Improvement Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. FINANCIAL STABILITY OVERSIGHT COUNCIL.

    Section 113 of the Financial Stability Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5323) 
is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ``The Council'' 
                and inserting ``Subject to paragraph (3), the 
                Council''; and
                    (B) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) Initial determination.--The Council may not vote on a 
        proposed determination with respect to a U.S. nonbank financial 
        company under paragraph (1) unless the Council first 
        determines, in consultation with the company and the primary 
        financial regulatory agency with respect to the company, that a 
        different action by the Council or the agency (including the 
        application of new or heightened standards and safeguards under 
        section 120), or by the company under a written plan that is 
        submitted promptly to the Council, is impracticable or 
        insufficient to mitigate the threat that the company could pose 
        to the financial stability of the United States.''; and
            (2) in subsection (f)(1), by striking ``subsection (e)'' 
        and inserting ``subsections (a)(3) and (e)''.
                                 <all>
```
### §177. Repealed. Pub. L. 87–826, §3, Oct. 15, 1962, 76 Stat. 953

Section, acts July 16, 1892, ch. 196, §1, 27 Stat. 197; Mar. 3, 1893, ch. 211, §1, 27 Stat. 689; Feb. 14, 1903, ch. 552, §10, 32 Stat. 829; Aug. 23, 1912, ch. 350, §1, 37 Stat. 407; Mar. 4, 1913, ch. 141, §1, 37 Stat. 736, related to returns of exports to foreign countries leaving the United States by rail. See section 301 et seq. of Title 13, Census.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective 180 days after Oct. 15, 1962, see section 4 of Pub. L. 87–826, set out as a note under section 301 of Title 13, Census.

#### Savings Provision

See section 3 of Pub. L. 87–826, set out as a note under sections 173 and 174 of this title.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008 of Financial
Security Assurance Holdings Ltd. (the "Company"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph W. Simon, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



By:

/s/ JOSEPH W. SIMONChief Financial Officer
March 19, 2009


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
(38 South. 889.)

No. 15,719.

#### STATE v. FAIRBANKS.

(June 19, 1905.)

CERTIORARI — WHEN TIES.

A proceeding by certiorari for the review of a verdict and sentence in a criminal case has no function to discharge where an appeal from such verdict and sentence has been sustained.

(Syllabus by the Court.)

Clay W. Fairbanks was convicted of assault by willfully shooting, and appeals, and, he prays for writs of certiorari, prohibition, and habeas corpus.

Dismissed.

*37Dagg & Dale, for relator. Respondent judge, pro se.

Statement.

MONROE, J.

Relator alleges that upon April 28, 1905, he was convicted by a jury of 12, 11 jurors concurring, in the district court of the parish of Catahoula, upon a charge of “assault by willfully shooting at,” etc., and that on the following day he was sentenced; that it was his intention to appeal, but that the court adjourned almost immediately, and that he was not aware that it would not be in session during the following week; that on the Monday following the Saturday upon which he was sentenced the judge left the parish, and went to Winnsboro, in the parish of Franklin; and that on the next day relator employed counsel, who obtained for him in the parish of Franklin an order of appeal to this court. He further alleges that he lodged the appeal here in due time, but that the Attorney General has moved to dismiss it on the ground that the order was not granted in open court, and he further sets forth the reasons for which he thinks that the verdict and sentence should be set aside, and prays that the same be reviewed, by means of the writ of certiorari, to be made returnable and heard with the appeal or motion to dismiss the appeal.

Opinion.

As the appeal has been sustained, this proceeding has no function to discharge. It is therefore dismissed, at the cost of the relator.
A district court may grant a post-conviction motion to 

withdraw a guilty plea in order to "correct manifest injustice." NRS 

176.165; see also Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59-60 (1985); Strickland v. 

Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984); Rubio v. State, 124 Nev. 1032, 

1039-40, 194 P.3d 1224, 1228-29 (2008). Here, the district court found 

that Vega-Reynoso was informed that his guilty plea and conviction "will 

likely have adverse effects" and "would likely result in deportation," and 

determined that Vega-Reynoso failed to demonstrate that he was entitled 

to the withdrawal of his guilty plea based on a manifest injustice. Most 

importantly, the district court found that Vega-Reynoso "has not 

presented any evidence, by affidavit or otherwise, that he was not aware of 

the consequences of his guilty plea on his immigration status." 

Additionally, the district court determined that Vega-Reynoso's delay in 

filing his motion, and the subsequent loss of evidence, "will prejudice the 

State, which is no longer in a position to prosecute Defendant." We 

conclude that Vega-Reynoso failed to demonstrate that his plea was 

invalid, see Rubio, 124 Nev. at 1039-40, 194 P.3d at 1228-29, and the 

district court did not abuse its discretion by denying his motion, see Bryant 

v. State, 102 Nev. 268, 272, 721 P.2d 364, 368 (1986). Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2 
cc: Hon. Janet J. Berry, District Judge 

Ian E. Silverberg 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Washoe County District Attorney 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

3
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 27, 2014

s0519

Order 

Clerk

May 27, 2014

148700

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148700

COA: 312355

Oakland CC: 2010-231273-FH

REGINALD C. TAYLOR, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 17, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
### §1704. Registration of subdivisions

#### (a) Filing of statement of record

A subdivision may be registered by filing with the Director a statement of record, meeting the requirements of this chapter and such rules and regulations as may be prescribed by the Director in furtherance of the provisions of this chapter. A statement of record shall be deemed effective only as to the lots specified therein.

#### (b) Payment of fees; use by Director

At the time of filing a statement of record, or any amendment thereto, the developer shall pay to the Director a fee, not in excess of $1,000, in accordance with a schedule to be fixed by the regulations of the Director, which fees may be used by the Director to cover all or part of the cost of rendering services under this chapter, and such expenses as are paid from such fees shall be considered nonadministrative.

#### (c) Filing deemed to have taken place upon receipt of statement of record accompanied by fee

The filing with the Director of a statement of record, or of an amendment thereto, shall be deemed to have taken place upon the receipt thereof, accompanied by payment of the fee required by subsection (b).

#### (d) Availability of information to public

The information contained in or filed with any statement of record shall be made available to the public under such regulations as the Director may prescribe and copies thereof shall be furnished to every applicant at such reasonable charge as the Director may prescribe.

(Pub. L. 90–448, title XIV, §1405, Aug. 1, 1968, 82 Stat. 592; Pub. L. 111–203, title X, §1098A(1), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 2105.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2010—Pub. L. 111–203 substituted "Director" for "Secretary" wherever appearing.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2010 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 111–203 effective on the designated transfer date, see section 1100H of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as a note under section 552a of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### Effective Date

Section effective upon the expiration of two hundred and seventy days after Aug. 1, 1968, see section 1423 of Pub. L. 90–448, set out as a note under section 1701 of this title.
#### § 73.11 Treatment of means of conveyance and premises having contained scabby cattle.

Means of conveyance, yards, pens, sheds, chutes, or other premises or facilities which have contained cattle of a consignment in which scabies is found shall be treated within 72 hours of use and prior to further use in the required concentration with a permitted dip listed in § 73.10 under supervision of a State or Federal inspector or an accredited veterinarian.

[38 FR 21996, Aug. 15, 1973, as amended at 41 FR 5384, Feb. 6, 1976]
Editorial Note on Part 12
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 12 appear at 69 FR 32438, June 10, 2004.

§ 12.20 General requirements. ( a ) Unless provided with a written exemption pursuant to § 12.21, every applicant or licensee must develop and file with the Regional Engineer an emergency action plan and appendices, verified in accordance with § 12.13.
( b ) The emergency action plan must be: ( 1 ) Developed in consultation and cooperation with appropriate Federal, state, and local agencies responsible for public health and safety; and
( 2 ) Designed to provide early warning to upstream and downstream inhabitants, property owners, operators of water-related facilities, recreational users, and other persons in the vicinity who might be affected by a project emergency as defined in § 12.3(b)(9).
[Order 122, 46 FR 9036, Jan. 28, 1981, as amended at 87 FR 1515, Jan. 11, 2022]
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 1 110 West Washington Street•Phoenix, Arizona 85007 (602)771-2300 www.azdeq.gov

Henry R.Darwin Acting Director APR 1. ZOlI Deborah Jordan Director, Air Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX 75 Hawthorne Street, ORA-1 San Francisco, CA 94105 Re: SIP Revision
to the Arizona State SIP for the Update to the Stage 11 Vapor Recovery Program Dear It has cometo ourattention that official published copies of the Arizona Revised Statues (ARS) and Rules included asenclosures

3 and 4 (respectively)
of the September 21, 2009 Sip Revision
to the Arizona State SIP for the Update to the Stage II Vapor Recovery Program are required for the evaluation of the submission. Please replace the previously submitted enclosures

3 and 4 with the attached official copies: Enclosure

3 Arizona Revised Statutes: (1) Title 41, chapter 15, article

1, section 41-2051, subsections (6), (10), (11), (12), and (13)- (i.e., the definitions of certification, Department, Diesel fuel, Director, and E85); (2) Title 41, chapter 15, article 6, section 41-2121, subsection (5)- (i.e., the definition of gasoline); and (3) Title 41. chapter 15, article 7, sections 41-2131, 41-2132, and 41-2133. Enclosure

4 Arizona Administrative Code: (I) Title 20, chapter 2, article

1, section R20-2- 101; and (2) Title 20, chapter
2, article 9, sections R20-2-901-R20-2-905 and R20-2-907-R20-2-912. Sincerely, Eric C. M Director, uality Division Enclosures (2) cc:Colleen McKaughan Northern Regional Office
Southern RegionalOffice 1801W.Route66•Suite 117• Flagstaff,AZ 86001

400 West Congress Street•Suite 433•Tucson,AZ85701 (928) 779-0313

(520) 628-6733 JaniceK. Brewer Governor
Printed onrecycled paper
### §228. "Banking Act of 1935"

The act of August 23, 1935, ch. 614, 49 Stat. 684, may be cited as the "Banking Act of 1935."

(Aug. 23, 1935, ch. 614, §1, 49 Stat. 684.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Banking Act of 1935, referred to in text, is classified to sections 2, 24, 33 to 34c, 35, 36, 51, 51a, 51b–1, 52, 59 to 61, 64a, 71a, 78, 84, 85, 170, 181, 192, 221a, 228, 241, 242, 244, 247a, 248, 263, 287, 288, 321, 324, 336, 341, 343, 347b, 352a, 355, 357, 371, 371b, 371c, 375a, 377, 378, 461, 462a–1, 462b, 465, 481, 482, 486, 619, 1702, 1703, 1709, and 1713 of this title; section 101 of Title 11, Bankruptcy; section 19 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade. See, also, sections 217, 218, 334, 655, 656, 709, 1005, 1906, 1909, and 2113 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure. For complete classification of this Act to the Code see Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Separability

Act Aug. 23, 1935, ch. 614, title III, §346, 49 Stat. 723, provided: "If any provision of this Act, or the application thereof to any person or circumstances, is held invalid, the remainder of the Act, and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances, shall not be affected thereby."
### §§678 to 682. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections were stricken by act Aug. 19, 1937, ch. 704, §7(b), 50 Stat. 707, and former section 677a of this title was substituted in lieu thereof.

Section 678, acts July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §4, 39 Stat. 363; Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 252, title III, §304, 42 Stat. 1474; June 16, 1933, ch. 98, title VII, §70a(a)(1), 48 Stat. 269, related to number and qualifications of directors.

Section 678a, act June 16, 1933, ch. 98, title VII, §70a(b), 48 Stat. 270, related to successors of directors.

Section 679, acts July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §4, 39 Stat. 363; Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 252, title III, §304, 42 Stat. 1474; June 16, 1933, ch. 98, title VII, §70a(a)(2), 48 Stat. 270, related to nomination of candidates for local directors.

Section 680, acts July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §4, 39 Stat. 363; Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 252, title III, §304, 42 Stat. 1474; June 16, 1933, ch. 98, title VII, §70a(a)(3), 48 Stat. 270, related to election of local directors.

Section 681, acts July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §4, 39 Stat. 363; Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 252, title III, §304, 42 Stat. 1474; June 16, 1933, ch. 98, title VII, §70a(a)(4), 48 Stat. 270, related to appointment and election of district directors and director at large, and filling of vacancies.

Section 682, acts July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §4, 39 Stat. 363; Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 252, title III, §304, 42 Stat. 1474, related to qualifications of directors and limitation on engagement in other business.
# C_2012184EN.01002001.xml

| 23.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 184/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 184/20

---

Order of the General Court of 10 May 2012 — Portugal v Commission

(Case T-475/10) (1)

1

2012/C 184/39

Language of the case: Portuguese

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 328, 4.12.2010.

1

---
USDA 

iiiii 

CJ 

CJ 

CJ 

CJ 

1111 

1111 

2023 RMA Crops' Indemnities

Source: USDA Risk Management Agency - Summary of Business

Data Current Date: January 16, 2024

Layer Credits: USDA & US Census Bureau

 The information displayed in this map is intended to serve as an aid in displaying data provided or stored by the Risk Management Agency. It does not modify, replace or supersede any USDA published policy provisions or procedures.

Map Projection: USA Contiguous Albers Equal Area Conic

Map Creation Date: January 16, 2024

Maps created by USDA Risk Management Agency are for spatial and visual context for depicting the basic information for “where”. Maps are not considered a survey. General Reference Only.

RMA Risk Management Services Division

 -- Public Information --

This map depicts weekly crop insurance indemnity data by county as of the data current date denoted on the map

No Indemnity ($0.00)

$0.01 - $1,000,000.00

$1,000,000.01 - $10,000,000.00

$10,000,000.01 - $25,000,000.00

$25,000,000.01 - $50,000,000.00

$50,000,000.01 - $140,887,385.00

and is published biweekly.