alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Seeks Applications to Rehabilitate and Preserve Rural Multi-Family and

Farmworker Housing

WASHINGTON, March 15, 2022 – U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Under Secretary for Rural 

Development Xochitl Torres Small today announced the Department is inviting applications for a program to 

help property owners make improvements to rural multi-family and farmworker housing properties financed by 

USDA. 

The Department is soliciting applications from property owners who wish to defer loan payments under the 

Multi-Family Housing Preservation and Revitalization (MPR) Demonstration Program. The owners may use 

funds generated by the debt deferral to make improvements and repairs that USDA Rural Development 

identified during a Capital Needs Assessment for each property. Property owners also may use the deferred 

loan payments to reduce tenant rents. 

The program will increase the assistance for projects addressing the critical challenges facing people living in

rural America. It supports the Biden-Harris Administration’s key priorities to help communities recover from

the COVID-19 pandemic, advance equity and combat climate change. Property owners with USDA loans that 

were closed on or after Oct. 1, 1991, that are addressing at least two of these three key priorities are eligible to

participate in the loan deferral program.

Electronic applications must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on May 16, 2022. For additional 

information on how to apply, see page 14441 of the March 15, 2022, Federal Register.

USDA Rural Development provides loans and grants to help expand economic opportunities and create jobs in 

rural areas. This assistance supports infrastructure improvements; business development; housing; community 

facilities such as schools, public safety and health care; and high-speed internet access in rural areas. For more 

information, visit www.rd.usda.gov. 

If you’d like to subscribe to USDA Rural Development updates, visit our GovDelivery subscriber page.

# 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
    This  schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
    Company's audited Consolidated Statement of Operations, Consolidated Balance
    Sheet, and  Consolidated  Statement of Cash Flows, in each case for the Year
    ended  December 31, 1998,  and  is qualified in its entirety by reference to
    such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000
<CURRENCY>                      U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                 1
<CASH>                          2,285               
<SECURITIES>                    108,237
<RECEIVABLES>                   15,325               
<ALLOWANCES>                    935               
<INVENTORY>                     18,593               
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                93,853               
<PP&E>                          246,553               
<DEPRECIATION>                  142,844               
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  489,794               
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           44,971               
<BONDS>                         477,672               
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        322               
<OTHER-SE>                      (24,727)               
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    489,794               
<SALES>                         29,227               
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                87,221               
<CGS>                           30,449               
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   122,721               
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                52,707               
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0               
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              53,771               
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (137,948)               
<INCOME-TAX>                    0               
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (137,948)               
<DISCONTINUED>                  0               
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0               
<CHANGES>                       0               
<NET-INCOME>                    (137,948)               
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   (4.52)               
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (4.51)               
        


</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register: June 10, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 111)]
[Notices]               
[Page 32981]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr10jn10-82]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7040]

 
Determination Under the Foreign Assistance Act and the Department 
of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Acts

    Pursuant to Section 654(c) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, 
as amended, notice is hereby given that the Deputy Secretary of State 
has made a determination pursuant to section 620H of the Foreign 
Assistance Act, and section 7021 of the Department of State, Foreign 
Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations, 2010 (Div. F, Pub. L. 
111-117), and similar provisions in prior-year appropriation acts, and 
has concluded that publication of the determination would be harmful to 
the national security of the United States.

    Dated: June 3, 2010.
Vann H. Van Diepen,
Acting Assistant Secretary of State for International Security and 
Nonproliferation, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-13969 Filed 6-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-27-P
```
# C_2010301EN.01004301.xml

| 6.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/43

---

Action brought on 7 September 2010 — Continental Bulldog Club Deutschland v OHIM

(Case T-383/10)

()

2010/C 301/69

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Continental Bulldog Club Deutschland eV (Berlin, Germany) (represented by S. Vollmer, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 23 June 2010 in Case R 300/2010-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 23 June 2010 in Case R 300/2010-1;

| — | In the alternative, annul the contested decision, in so far as it concerns goods and services in Class 44; |
| --- | --- |

—

In the alternative, annul the contested decision, in so far as it concerns goods and services in Class 44;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings, including those of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings, including those of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘CONTINENTAL’ for goods in Classes 31 and 44.

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the Examiner: Registration was refused.

Decision of the Examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: The appeal was dismissed.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Breach of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, (1) since the Community trade mark in question is distinctive and is not descriptive.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

1

---
# C_2011030EN.01005706.xml

| 29.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/57

---

Order of the General Court of 18 November 2010 — Scuola Elementare Maria Montessori v Commission

(Case T-193/10) (1)

1

()

2011/C 30/106

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 179, 3.7.2010.

1

---
### SUBCHAPTER IV—ASSESSING OPTIONS FOR SUCCESSOR LAND REMOTE SENSING SYSTEM
# C_2011252EN.01005402.xml

| 27.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/54

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 16 June 2011 — Adriaens and Others v Commission

(Case F-87/10) (1)

1

(Staff cases - Annual adjustment of the remuneration and pensions of officials and other servants - No need to adjudicate)

2011/C 252/118

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Stéphane Adriaens (Evere, Belgium) and Others (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Berscheid and D. Martin, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application to annul the defendant’s decision, contained in the applicants’ pay slips, to limit their salary adjustment, with effect from July 2009, to an increase of 1.85 % in the context of the annual adjustment of remuneration and pensions of officials and other servants on the basis of Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1296/2009 of 23 December 2009.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no need to adjudicate on Case F-87/10 Adriaens and Others v Commission. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no need to adjudicate on Case F-87/10 Adriaens and Others v Commission.

| 2. | Each party is ordered to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each party is ordered to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 13, 15.01.2011, p. 40.

1

---
### §1294. Antitrust laws unaffected as regards to other activities of professional sports contests

Nothing contained in this chapter shall be deemed to change, determine, or otherwise affect the applicability or nonapplicability of the antitrust laws to any act, contract, agreement, rule, course of conduct, or other activity by, between, or among persons engaging in, conducting, or participating in the organized professional team sports of football, baseball, basketball, or hockey, except the agreements to which section 1291 of this title shall apply.

(Pub. L. 87–331, §4, Sept. 30, 1961, 75 Stat. 732.)
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender.

STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Rural Development Announces Executive Leadership Changes

WASHINGTON, July 14, 2020 – USDA Rural Development Deputy Under Secretary Bette Brand today 

announced Cathy Glover has been selected to serve as Deputy Administrator of Single Family Housing 

following the retirement of Roger Glendenning.

Glover has more than 30 years of affordable housing experience, most recently as the Executive Director of 

USDA Rural Development’s Single Family Housing Guaranteed Loan Program. She started her career with 

USDA in 1988 and has worked at the local, state and National Office levels of Rural Development. She also 

spent two years with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, working in the Federal Housing 

Administration’s Home Mortgage Insurance Division. 

Glendenning will be missed after a long and successful career as a leader in rural economic development. He 

started his career in housing and farm-related programs in 1987 with the Farmers Home Administration in 

Delaware and Maryland before moving to the Washington, D.C., headquarters office in 1996. He has worked at 

USDA Rural Development in the capacity of Director of the Single Family Housing Guaranteed Loan Division

(2001-2006), Chief Budget Officer (2007-2009), Budget Director (2010-2012), and Chief Financial Officer 

(2013 – February 2018). He was appointed to the position of Deputy Administrator, Single Family Housing at 

Rural Development in March 2018.

Glendenning also served as acting Rural Development Deputy Under Secretary (2017).

Glover will begin her new role on August 1. 

###
Exhibit
13.1


Section
906 Certification






The
certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual
Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the “Report”) for the
purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code.




Jorge
Carlos Bledel, the Chief Executive Officer and Martín Ezequiel Zarich, the Chief
Financial Officer of BBVA Banco Francés S.A., each certifies that, to the best
of his knowledge:




1.
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Exchange Act; and




2.
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of BBVA Banco
      Francés S.A.








March 28,
2008




/s/  Jorge
      Carlos BledelName:
      Jorge Carlos Bledel
              Chief
      Executive Officer/s/  Martín
      Ezequiel ZarichName:
      Martín Ezequiel Zarich
              Chief
      Financial Officer
Chart 8

2005 Average Fuel Consumption Rates by Aircraft Type

4.5

15.9

17.2

61.2

21.5

87.3

16.0

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 

Light-sport

Experimental

Other Aircraft

Rotorcraft: Turbine

Rotorcraft: Piston

Fixed Wing: Turbojet

Fixed Wing: Turboprop

Fixed Wing: Piston

Aircraft Type

Gallons Per Hour Source: 2005 GAATAA Survey Table 5.1
Table 5.1

Average Estimated Percent Average Estimated Percent Average Estima

AIRCRAFT TYPE Rate Fuel Use Standard Rate Fuel Use Standard Rate Fuel 

GPH (thous gal) Error GPH (thous gal) Error GPH (thous 

Fixed Wing: Piston 49.9 17,201.7 7.0 15.9 269,847.3 7.2 19.6 26,9Fixed Wing: Turboprop 93.6 180,624.2 1.7 24.7 1,902.1 7.6 35.3 13Fixed Wing: Turbojet 313.7 1,136,826.8 1.1 267.3 809.1 32.3 211.0 52Rotorcraft: Piston 28.4 369.4 22.1 22.0 11,774.7 14.0 13.9 39Rotorcraft: Turbine 62.7 141,013.4 4.3 31.8 1,292.8 19.2 12.9 Other Aircraft * * * 11.3 260.1 23.0 * Experimental 166.1 31,407.3 15.8 11.2 8,976.6 5.6 16.9 80Light-sport * * * 5.1 7.7 9.3 5.0 Total All Aircraft 175.9 1,507,442.8 1.2 15.7 294,870.4 6.5 19.5 28,77

Table Notes:Beginning in 2004, commuter activity is excluded from all estimates. 2003 and prior, commuter activity was included in the Air Taxi use category.Columns may not add to totals due to rounding procedures.An asterisk indicates no active aircraft of that type reporting use of the fuel.Note that the fuel types are split across pages so that more detail can be reported.

Jet Fuel Aviation Fuel: 100-Low Lead Aviation Fuel: 1

2005 GENERAL AVIATION TOTAL FUEL CONSUMED AND 

AVERAGE FUEL CONSUMPTION RATE BY AIRCRAFT TYPE

Page 5 - 1
Table 5.1

Average Estimated Percent Average Estimated Percent Average Estima

AIRCRAFT TYPE Rate Fuel Use Standard Rate Fuel Use Standard Rate Fuel 

GPH (thous gal) Error GPH (thous gal) Error GPH (thous 

Fixed Wing: Piston 10.5 8,794.6 8.4 7.0 35.7 65.6 16.0 322,78Fixed Wing: Turboprop 47.7 4.7 36.6 62.0 119.9 7.2 87.3 182,78Fixed Wing: Turbojet * * * * * * 313.5 1,138,16Rotorcraft: Piston 9.7 98.4 44.8 * * * 21.5 12,63Rotorcraft: Turbine * * * * * * 61.2 142,3Other Aircraft 6.0 9.0 0.0 17.3 2,295.3 8.4 17.2 2,56Experimental 5.8 1,671.0 8.7 17.5 431.5 97.7 15.9 43,29Light-sport 4.4 33.2 7.4 * * * 4.5 4Total All Aircraft 8.9 10,610.8 7.5 17.0 2,882.4 17.4 33.1 1,844,58

Table Notes:Beginning in 2004, commuter activity is excluded from all estimates. 2003 and prior, commuter activity was included in the Air Taxi use category.Columns may not add to totals due to rounding procedures.An asterisk indicates no active aircraft of that type reporting use of the fuel.Note that the fuel types are split across pages so that more detail can be reported.

Automotive Gasoline Other Fuel Total Fuel 

2005 GENERAL AVIATION TOTAL FUEL CONSUMED AND 

AVERAGE FUEL CONSUMPTION RATE BY AIRCRAFT TYPE

Page 5 - 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> BD
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from SEC
Form 10-K and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statemnts.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                         2454100
<RECEIVABLES>                                  5605947
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                  0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                           10641496
<PP&E>                                         1479044
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                21577799
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<PAYABLES>                                     5168977
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                  0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                             1852237
<LONG-TERM>                                    2000000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         50903
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  21577799
<TRADING-REVENUE>                             28784099
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                            214384
<COMMISSIONS>                                  1728938
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                  2966120
<FEE-REVENUE>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<COMPENSATION>                                16451594
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 456770
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      456770
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    236449
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04
        


</TABLE>
#### § 354.48 Willful violation of the regulations.

Any willful violation of the regulations in this part or the Act.
#### Justin Mitchell, Respondent, v Fidelity Borrowing LLC, Appellant.

[827 NYS2d 107]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Sherry Klein Heitler, J.), entered January 12, 2006, which granted plaintiffs motion for a prejudgment order of attachment pursuant to CPLR 6201 (3), and ordered defendant to either post a bond in the amount of $160,000 or secure said amount in an interest-bearing escrow account, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion denied and the order of attachment vacated.

Plaintiff failed to demonstrate in satisfaction of the requirements of CPLR 6201 (3) that defendant, “ha[d] assigned, disposed of, encumbered or secreted property, or removed it from the state or [was] about to do any of th[ose] acts.” Rather, plaintiff merely alleged that defendant’s sudden decision to start a new company was based solely on its intent to defraud plaintiff and to frustrate his efforts to collect any judgment against defendant *(see Benedict v Browne,*289 AD2d 433 [2001]).

Plaintiff also fell short of meeting CPLR 6201 (3)’s requirements by failing to show that defendant intended to defraud or frustrate the enforcement of any judgment against it. We have previously held that, “[t]he fact that the affidavits in support of an attachment contain allegations raising a suspicion of an intent to defraud is not enough” *(Rosenthal v Rochester Button Co.,*148 AD2d 375, 376 [1989]). Indeed, “fraud is never presumed by a mere showing of the liquidation or disposal by a *367debtor of its business assets” *(id.).*Thus, defendant’s assertion that it will close its mortgage brokerage business if it obtains approval to become a banking institution was not sufficient proof that it intended to defraud plaintiff or frustrate the enforcement of any judgment against it. Indeed, defendant’s principal asserted, in opposition to plaintiffs motion, that it was a solvent company and was meeting all of its obligations, including payments to creditors *(see Anderson v Malley,*191 App Div 573, 575 [1920]). Plaintiff has also failed to demonstrate that defendant is in financial distress and will unlikely be able to pay any judgment in the future *(see Rosenthal,*148 AD2d at 377).

Finally, the IAS court erred by not requiring plaintiff to post a bond in an amount sufficient to pay defendant damages, including attorneys’ fees, in the event, now realized, that plaintiff was found not entitled to an attachment (CPLR 6212 [b]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P, Friedman, Sullivan, Catterson and Malone, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alliance Laundry
Systems LLC, Alliance Laundry Corporation and Alliance Laundry Holdings LLC (the Companies) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Thomas F. LEsperance, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Companies.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/    THOMAS F.
LESPERANCE         
|Chief Executive Officer and President



November 10, 2005