alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §§831 to 833. Repealed. Pub. L. 92–181, title V, §5.26(a), Dec. 10, 1971, 85 Stat. 624

Section 831, acts July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §17, 39 Stat. 375; Ex. Ord. No. 6084, Mar. 27, 1933; Aug. 19, 1937, ch. 704, §9, 50 Stat. 707; Aug. 18, 1959, Pub. L. 86–168, title I, §104(h), 73 Stat. 387, contained an enumeration of the powers of Farm Credit Administration. See section 2252 of this title.

Section 832, acts Sept. 21, 1944, ch. 412, title VI, §601(a) to (c), 58 Stat. 740; Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 785, title III, §307, 69 Stat. 665; July 26, 1956, ch. 741, title I, §108, 70 Stat. 667; Aug. 18, 1959, Pub. L. 86–168, title I, §104(h), 73 Stat. 387, provided for allocation of administrative expenses rendered each year by Farm Credit Administration. See section 2250 of this title.

Section 833, act Sept. 21, 1944, ch. 412, title VI, §602, 58 Stat. 741, authorized purchase of manuscripts, data, and special reports by Farm Credit Administration.
FORM RD 2006-46 (Rev. 01-98)

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE MANUAL ISSUE No.

RURAL DEVELOPMENT WSAL PN 607

Washington, D.C 20250 DATE

March 8, 2024

PROCEDURE NOTICE

RD MANUAL CHANGES

INSERT RD INS 440.1 INTEREST RATES, AMORTIZATION, 

(WSAL) GUARANTEE FEE, ANNUAL CHARGE, AND 

FIXED PERIOD. This Instruction is 

partially revised as follows:

Exhibit B is partially revised to update the Treasury Judgement rate and the 

effective date of March 1, 2024.

INSERT

Exhibit B revised 3-7-24. 

RD HANDBOOK CHANGES

INSERT RD HB-1-3550 DIRECT SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING LOANS AND

(WSAL) GRANTS FIELD OFFICE HANDBOOK. Chapter 12 

is revised to streamline and/or clarify 

program requirements. The specific revisions are outlined below:

Edits include but are not limited to: 

• 12.2, A., Added new section addressing eligible uses of 504 program funds. 

• 12.3, Added new section for Form RD 3550-35, Section 504 Home Repair Loan and 

Grant Program Intake Form.

• 12.5, B., language added to specify that a TMCR is not required to deny a loan 

request of less than $7,500.

• 12.5, C., Language added to specify that home equity should not be included in 

the applicant’s asset requirements.

• 12.5, F., Guidance added to address trusts. 

• 12.6, B. and Attachment 12-B Language added to specify that an appraisal is 

never required for unsecured loans.

• 12.8, B. Language added to specify that a change in ownership resets a 

dwellings grant eligibility provided the transfer was not to another household 

member.

• Attachment 12-A updated to specify that a list of settlement service providers 

is only required when a Loan Estimate is issued, removed outdated information 

related to adjusted income exceeding 30%, and noted that loans $7,500 or 

greater require a TMCR.

READ PROCEDURE - DISCUSS IN STAFF CONFERENCE - KEEP PROCEDURE MANUAL UP TO DATE
Page 2 ISSUED: PN 607

March 8, 2024

RD HANDBOOK CHANGES

INSERT RD HB-1-3550 (Con.)

(WSAL)

• Update Attachment 12-C, 504 Single Family Housing Loan and Grant Checklist to:

o Added prequalification processing section,

o Added builders warranty line to contracts $10,000 or less, and 

o Updated miscellaneous classification codes related to ECF updates. 

• These changes will:

o Ensure consistency between the 502 and 504 program documents.

o Increase grant obligation.

INSERT

Chapter 12 dated 01-23-03:

 Pages 12-1 through 12-14,

 Attachment 12-A through 12-C revised 03-08-24.

oOo
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### March 24, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 135489 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 135489 COA: 270047 Kent CC: 05-003497-FC ANTHONY LAMONT MAY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e October 23, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0317 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 24, 2008

Clerk
#### Hicks *v.*Armour and Company.

[No. 12,446.

Filed October 16, 1925.]

From Industrial Board of Indiana.

Proceedings under the Workmen’s Compensation Act between Richard Hicks and Armour and Company. From the order made therein, the former appeals. *Appeal dismissed. By*the court in banc.

*E. L. Johnson*and *Joseph K. Brown,*for appellant.

*J. D. Pierce,*for appellee.

Remy, C. J.

Dismissed on authority of *Highfield*v. *Duffy*(1917), 64 Ind. App. 102, 115 N. E. 347.
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1410

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 with respect to the treatment

of certain air transportation.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 21, 1999

Mr. STEVENS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 with respect

to the treatment of certain air transportation.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE

4 CODE OF 1986.

5 Subsection (j) of section 132 of the Internal Revenue

6 Code of 1986 (relating to certain fringe benefits) is

7 amended by adding at the end thereof the following new

8 paragraph:

9 ‘‘(9) SPECIAL RULE FOR CERTAIN NONCOMMER10 CIAL AIR TRANSPORTATION.—Notwithstanding any
2

S 1410 IS

1 other provision of this section, the term ‘no-addi2 tional-cost service’ includes the value of transpor3 tation provided to any person on a noncommercially

4 operated aircraft if—

5 ‘‘(A) such transportation is provided on a

6 flight made in the ordinary course of the trade

7 or business of the taxpayer owning or leasing

8 such aircraft for use in such trade or business;

9 ‘‘(B) the flight on which the transportation

10 is provided would have been made whether or

11 not such person was transported on the flight;

12 and

13 ‘‘(C) no substantial additional cost is in14 curred in providing such transportation to such

15 person.

16 For purposes of this paragraph, an aircraft is noncommer17 cially operated if transportation thereon is not provided

18 or made available to the general public by purchase of a

19 ticket or other fare.’’.

20 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

21 The amendment made by section 1 shall take effect

22 on January 1, 2000.

Æ
# C_2011282EN.01004802.xml

| 24.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/48

---

Order of the General Court of 14 July 2011 — Apotheke DocMorris v OHIM (Representation of a green cross)

(Case T-173/10) (1)

1

2011/C 282/89

Language of the case: German

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 179, 3.7.2010.

1

---
§ 205.103 EFS—minimum information. ( a ) The minimum information necessary on an EFS is as follows: ( 1 ) Crop year *unless* every crop of the farm product in question, for the duration of the EFS, is to be subject to the particular security interest;
( 2 ) Farm product name (see §§ 205.106, 205.206);
( 3 ) Each county or parish in the same State where the farm product is produced or located;
( 4 ) Name and address of each person subjecting the farm product to the security interest, whether or not a debtor (see § 205.102);
( 5 ) Social security number or other approved unique identifier or, if other than a natural person, IRS taxpayer identification number or other approved unique identifier of each such person;
( 6 ) Further details of the farm product subject to the security interest *if needed* to distinguish it from other such product owned by the same person or persons but not subject to the particular security interest (see § 205.207); and
( 7 ) Secured party name and address.
( b ) A requirement of additional information on an EFS is discretionary with the State.
( c ) Whether to permit one EFS to reflect multiple products, or products in multiple counties, is discretionary with the State.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0580-0016) [51 FR 29451, Aug. 18, 1986, as amended at 71 FR 56342, Sept. 27, 2006]
§ 93.516 Import permit and declaration for swine. ( a ) For swine intended for importation from Canada, the importer shall first apply for and obtain from APHIS an import permit as provided in § 93.504: *Provided,* That an import permit is not required for swine offered for entry at a land border port designated in § 93.503(b) if such swine: ( 1 ) Was born in Canada or the United States, and has been in no region other than Canada or the United States, or
( 2 ) Has been legally imported into Canada from some other region and unconditionally released in Canada so as to be eligible to move freely within that region without restriction of any kind and has been in Canada after such release for 60 days or longer.
( b ) For all swine offered for importation from Canada, the importer or his or her agent shall present two copies of a declaration as provided in § 93.506.
[55 FR 31495, Aug. 2, 1990. Redesignated and amended at 62 FR 56012, 56020, Oct. 28, 1997]
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA to Host Listening Sessions with State Historic Preservation Offices on 

How to Improve Rural Development’s Environmental Review Process

WASHINGTON, July 16, 2021 – The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) today announced it is hosting 

listening sessions on July 22 and Aug. 3, 2021, to solicit feedback from State Historic Preservation Offices on 

ways to improve USDA Rural Development’s environmental review process.

USDA Rural Development is encouraging integral feedback from individuals who may participate in 

consultation for projects funded or authorized by the agency’s Rural Utilities Service, Rural BusinessCooperative Service and the Rural Housing Service. 

The Department is inviting feedback on environmental review policies and procedures in 7 CFR Part 1970,

including compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. 

 

These listening sessions are part of a series designed to gather input from a broad range of Rural Development 

customers and perspectives. 

This first session will be held virtually on Thursday, July 22, 2021, at 2:30 p.m. Eastern Time. To register, visit:

https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/4760374491670620430. 

The second session will be held virtually on Tuesday, Aug. 3, 2021 at 2:30 p.m. Eastern Time. To register, visit: 

https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/3575776057068623885.

Registrants will receive an email with instructions to join online or by phone. For questions about the listening 

session, please email RD.Innovation@usda.gov. 

If you’d like to subscribe to USDA Rural Development updates, visit our GovDelivery subscriber page.

###

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
131695 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 131695 COA: 269340 Wayne CC: 04-007873-01 DESMOND KENNETH CRUMSEY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to ap peal the May 30, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t1023 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2006

Clerk
Exhibit 32.1



Statement of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of CROWN FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. (the Company) for the year ended January 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), John P. Leighton, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|             |  |                                                                 
|------------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------
|             |  | /s/ JOHN P. LEIGHTON                                            
|Name: Title: |  | John P. Leighton Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President



Date: March 9, 2004
### §1503b. Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere; duties; appointment; compensation

There shall be in the Department of Commerce an Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere who shall serve as the Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration established by Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1970 [5 U.S.C. App.] and perform such duties as the Secretary of Commerce shall prescribe. The Under Secretary shall be appointed by the President by and with the advice and consent of the Senate and shall be compensated at the rate now or hereafter provided for Level III of the Executive Schedule Pay Rates (5 U.S.C. 5314).

(Pub. L. 99–659, title IV, §407(a), Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3739.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1970, referred to in text, is set out under section 1511 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Service by Incumbent Administrator and Deputy Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

Pub. L. 99–659, title IV, §407(c), Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3739, provided that: "The individual serving on the date of enactment of this Act [Nov. 14, 1986]—

"(A) as the Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration shall also serve as the Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere until such time as a successor is appointed under subsection (a) of this section [enacting this section]; and

"(B) as the Deputy Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration shall also serve as the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere until such time as a successor is appointed under subsection (b) of this section [enacting section 1507(c) of this title]."
### §3764. Record of foreclosure and sale

#### (a) Statements included

To establish a sufficient record of foreclosure and sale, the foreclosure commissioner shall include in the recitals of the deed to the purchaser, or prepare as an affidavit or addendum to the deed, a statement setting forth—

(1) the date, time, and place of the foreclosure sale;

(2) that the mortgage was held by the Secretary, the date of the mortgage, the office in which the mortgage was recorded, and the liber number and folio or other appropriate description of the recordation of the mortgage;

(3) the particulars of the foreclosure commissioner's service of the notice of default and foreclosure sale in accordance with sections 3758 and 3760 of this title;

(4) the date and place of filing the notice of default and foreclosure sale;

(5) that the foreclosure was conducted in accordance with the provisions of this chapter and with the terms of the notice of default and foreclosure sale; and

(6) the sale amount.

#### (b) Effect of statements

The items set forth in subsection (a) shall—

(1) be prima facie evidence of the truth of such facts in any Federal or State court; and

(2) evidence a conclusive presumption in favor of bona fide purchasers and encumbrancers for value without notice.

Encumbrancers for value include liens placed by lenders who provide the purchaser with purchase money in exchange for a security interest in the newly-conveyed property.

#### (c) Recordation of instruments

The deed executed by the foreclosure commissioner, the foreclosure commissioner's affidavit (if prepared) and any other instruments submitted for recordation in relation to the foreclosure of the security property under this chapter shall be accepted for recordation by the registrar of deeds or other appropriate official of the county or counties in which the security property is located upon tendering of payment of the usual recording fees for such instruments, and without regard to the compliance of those instruments with any other local filing requirements.

(Pub. L. 103–327, title II, Sept. 28, 1994, 108 Stat. 2316.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is based on section 815 of title VIII of S. 2281, One Hundred Third Congress, as reported July 13, 1994, which was enacted into law by Pub. L. 103–327.
#### § 95.3 Byproducts from diseased animals prohibited.

The importation of any animal byproduct taken or removed from an animal affected with anthrax, foot-and-mouth disease, highly pathogenic avian influenza, or Newcastle disease is prohibited.

[83 FR 15493, Apr. 11, 2018]
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 09**  **- 8164** 

FREDERICK L. GOODMAN , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. MARYLAND PAROLE COMMISSION; DAVID R. BLUMBERG, Chairman; MICHAEL BLOUNT, Commissioner; MARTHA S. KLIMA, Parole Comm issioner , Defendants

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore
. Andre M. Davis , District Judge. ( 1:08

- cv - 01337

- RDB )

Submitted : March 11, 2010 Decided: March 31, 2010

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Frederick L. Goodman, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Howe Baron, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinion s are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Frederick L. Goodman appeals the district court ’ s order s denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) complaint and denying his motion to alter or amend the judgment . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Goodman v. Maryland Parole Comm ’n , No. 1:0 8

- cv - 01337

- RDB (D. Md. filed July 15, 2009, entered July 16, 2009; Nov. 12, 2009). We take note that the use of victim impact statements in making a determination regarding parole and the Open Parole Hearing policy did not violate the Ex Post Facto Clause or Goodman’s right to due process. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are a dequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

February 6, 2014 — A Rural Development borrower in Texas was the victim of telephone fraud

and lost $450. The caller said he worked for USDA Rural Development and offered the 

borrower a loan modification. The borrower was advised that there was a $450 processing fee 

that must be paid through a WalMart Green Dot money coupon. The phone number the caller 

used was (585) 310-3069. This is a known scam where the callers use different names and 

different banks through which to route the funds.

Rural Development employees who receive reports of similar calls/requests should inform 

borrowers that they are a scam and advise them not to pay. Borrowers who believe they have 

been contacted by a scammer should contact their local Rural Development servicing office so 

that our staff can report the incident to Federal security officials.

#

USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. To file a complaint of discrimination, 

write: USDA, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, Office of Adjudication, 1400 

Independence Ave., SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (866) 632-9992 (Toll-free

Customer Service), (800) 877-8339 (Local or Federal relay), (866) 377-8642 (Relay voice users)
Exhibit


FIRST AMENDMENT TO SUPPLEMENTAL SAVINGS PLAN


FIRST AMENDMENT TO 
CALIFORNIA RESOURCES CORPORATION
SUPPLEMENTAL SAVINGS PLAN  



WHEREAS, CRC Services, LLC (the “Company”) has heretofore established and currently maintains, on behalf of itself and its participating affiliates, the California Resources Corporation Supplemental Savings Plan (the “Plan”) for the benefit of eligible employees of the Company and such participating affiliates; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 7.1 of the Plan, the Plan may be amended at any time, and from time to time, by action of the Board of Directors of the Company; and
WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan in certain respects; 


NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows, effective as of March 7, 2016:
1.The Plan is hereby amended by deleting clause (1) of Section 4.2 of the Plan and substituting therefor a new clause (1) to read as follows:
		
	“(1)
	the product of (i) the Participant’s Compensation in excess of the amount specified in Code section 401(a)(17) as adjusted and in effect for the Plan Year multiplied by (ii) the sum of (x) the percentage rate (expressed as a percentage of compensation) of Employer Matching Contribution under the Savings Plan as in effect from time to time for the Plan Year (determined as if the Participant had elected to make Deferral Contributions under the Savings Plan at the minimum rate that would produce the maximum Employer Matching Contribution under the Savings Plan) and (y) the percentage rate of Employer Fixed Nonelective Contribution (which rate shall be determined based on the rate that applies to compensation above any Social Security integration level, if applicable) as in effect under the Savings Plan from time to time for the Plan Year; provided, however, that if the rate described in subclause (x) or (y) above changes during the Plan Year, then the amount described in this clause (1) shall be determined by prorating the amount determined under subclause (i) above among the different periods during which different rates of Employer Matching Contribution and Employer Fixed Nonelective Contribution are in effect for such Plan Year.  By way of example, if, for the Plan Year that begins on January 1, 2016, a Participant’s Compensation in excess of the amount specified in Code section 401(a)(17) equals $100,000, the Employer Matching Contribution rate for such Plan Year changes from 7% to 2% effective as of March 7, 2016, and the Employer Fixed Nonelective Contribution rate for such Plan Year changes from 12% to 0% effective as of March 7, 2016, then the allocation pursuant to this clause (1) for such Plan Year shall equal $5,065.57, which is the sum of $3,426.23 ($100,000 x 66/366 x 19%) plus $1,639.34 ($100,000 x 300/366 x 2%); and”


2.As amended hereby, the Plan is specifically ratified and reaffirmed.


[Signature on the following page.]

-1-




FIRST AMENDMENT TO SUPPLEMENTAL SAVINGS PLAN


EXECUTED this 11th day of February 2016.


CRC SERVICES, LLC 
        




By:        /s/  Daniel S Watts     
Name:   Daniel S. Watts
Title:     Vice Pres. – Compensation & Benefits
            
           

-2-