alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 3 (Friday, January 4, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 727]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-31744]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9006-9]

Environmental Impacts Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7146 or http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements.
Filed 12/24/2012 through 12/28/2012.
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/eisdata.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As of October 1, 2012, EPA will not accept 
paper copies or CDs of EISs for filing purposes; all submissions on or 
after October 1, 2012 must be made through e-NEPA.
    While this system eliminates the need to submit paper or CD copies 
to EPA to meet filing requirements, electronic submission does not 
change requirements for distribution of EISs for public review and 
comment. To begin using e-NEPA, you must first register with EPA's 
electronic reporting site--https://cdx.epa.gov/epa_home.asp

EIS No. 20120402, Draft EIS, FHWA, CA, State Route 58 (SR-58) Hinkley 
Expressway Project, Grade Separate, Widen, and Realign, San Bernardino 
County, CA, Comment Period Ends: 02/19/2013, Contact: James Shankel 
909-383-6379.
EIS No. 20120403, Draft EIS, FHWA, ID, US-95 Thorncreek Road to Moscow, 
from Milepost 337.67 to Milepost 344.00, Latah County, ID, Comment 
Period Ends: 02/22/2013, Contact: John A. Perry 208-334-9180 extension 
116.
EIS No. 20120404, Draft EIS, BLM, WA, Vantage to Pomona Heights 230 kV 
Transmission Line Project, Grant, Brenton, Kittitas, and Yakima 
Counties, WA, Comment Period Ends: 02/19/2013, Contact: William 
Schurger 509-665-2100.
EIS No. 20120405, Revised Draft EIS, USACE, LA, Morganza to the Gulf of 
Mexico, Hurricane and Storm Damage Risk Reduction System Project, 
Improvements and Changes, Terrebonne Parish and Lafourche Parish, LA, 
Comment Period Ends: 02/19/2013, Contact: Nathan Dayan 504-862-2530.
EIS No. 20120406, Final EIS, USFWS, DE, Prime Hook National Wildlife 
Refuge, Development of a Comprehensive Conservation Plan, Milton, DE, 
Review Period Ends: 02/04/2013, Contact: Thomas Bonetti 413-253-8307.

Amended Notices

EIS No. 20120395, Draft EIS, USFS, SC, AP Loblolly Pine Removal and 
Restoration Project, Andrew Pickens Ranger District, Sumter National 
Forest, Oconee County, SC, Comment Period Ends: 02/13/2013, Contact: 
Victor Wyant 864-638-9568 Revision to FR Notice Published 12/31/2012; 
Correcting Project State Location from CA to SC.

    Dated: December 31, 2012.
Dawn Roberts,
Management Analyst, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal 
Activities.
[FR Doc. 2012-31744 Filed 1-3-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
# C_2010179EN.01004002.xml

| 3.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/40

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 28 April 2010 — Parliament v U

(Case T-103/10 P(R)-R)

(Interim measures - Civil Service - Officials - Decision to dismiss - Order of the President of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union made in proceedings for interim measures - Application to suspend the operation of a measure - No need to adjudicate)

(2010/C 179/71)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: European Parliament (represented by: S. Seyr and K. Zejdová, Agents)

Respondent: U (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: F. Moyse and A. Salerno, lawyers)

Re:

Application to suspend the application of the order of the President of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union of 18 December 2009 in Case F-92/09 R U v Parliament [2009] ECR I-0000.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer a need to adjudicate on the application for interim measures made by the European Parliament. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer a need to adjudicate on the application for interim measures made by the European Parliament.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 42740

STATE OF IDAHO
,

Plaintiff

- Respondent ,

v.

VINCENT JOSEPH OLSZEWSKI
,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2015 Unpublished Opinion No. 659

Filed: October 16, 2015

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED
OPINION AND SHALL NOT
BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Michael E. Wetherell , District Judge.

Order revoking probation and oral motion for Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion for reduction of sentence, affirmed

.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Erik R. Lehtinen , Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________
Before GUTIERREZ, Judge; GRATTON, Judge;

and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Vincent Joseph Olszewski pled guilty to possession of a controlled substance, felony

, Idaho Code § 37

- 2732(c) . The district court imposed a seven year sente nce, with three years

determinate

. After a second probation violation, the district court revoked Olszewski’s probation

and executed the underlying sentence. During the disposition hearing, Olszewski orally

motioned the district court for an Idaho Cr iminal Rule ( I.C.R .) 35 motion for reduction of

sentence , which the district court denied. Olszewski appeals.

A motion for reduction of sentence under I.C.R. 35 is essentially a plea for leniency,

addressed to the sound discretion of the court. State v . Knighton , 143 Idaho 318, 319, 144 P.3d23, 24 (2006); State v. Allbee , 115 Idaho 845, 846, 771 P.2d 66, 67 (Ct. App. 1989). In

presenting an I.C.R. 35 motion, the defendant must show that the sentence is excessive in light of

new or additional informati on subsequently provided to the district court in support of the

motion. State v. Huffman , 144 Idaho 201, 203, 159 P.3d 838, 840 (2007). Upon review of the

record, including any new information submitted with Olszewski ’s I.C.R. 35 motion, we

conclude n o abuse of discretion has been shown. Therefore, the district court’s order denying

Olszewski ’s I.C.R. 35 motion is affirmed.
# C_2013156EN.01004301.xml

| 1.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/43

---

Order of the General Court of 9 April 2013 — Südzucker and Others v Commission

(Case T-102/10) (1)

1

(Agriculture - Sugar - Production levies - Partial annulment and declaration of nullity of Regulation (EC) No 1193/2009 after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 156/80

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Südzucker AG Mannheim/Ochsenfurt (Mannheim, Germany); Agrana Zucker GmbH (Vienna, Austria); Südzucker Polska S.A. (Wroclaw, Poland); Raffinerie tirlemontoise (Brussels, Belgium) and Saint Louis Sucre SA (Paris, France) (represented by: H.-J. Prieß and B. Sachs, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Rossi and B. Schima, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented initially by: F. Diez Moreno and subsequently by: A. Rubio Gonzâlez, abogados del Estado), and Republic of Lithuania (represented initially by: R. Janeckaitè and R. Krasuckaitè, and subseqeuntly by: R. Krasuckaitè and R. Makevičienè, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the applicant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented initially by: S. Behzadi-Spencer and S. Hathaway and subsequently by S. Behzadi-Spencer and A. Robinson, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1193/2009 of 3 November 2009 correcting Regulations (EC) No 1762/2003, (EC) No 1775/2004, (EC) No 1686/2005, (EC) No 164/2007 and fixing the production levies in the sugar sector for marketing years 2002/2003, 2003/2004, 2004/2005, 2005/2006 (OJ 2009 L 321, p. 1)

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate in the present action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate in the present action.

| 2. | The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those of Südzucker AG Mannheim/Ochsenfurt, Agrana Zucker GmbH, Südzucker Polska S.A., Raffinerie tirlemontoise and Saint Louis Sucre SA. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those of Südzucker AG Mannheim/Ochsenfurt, Agrana Zucker GmbH, Südzucker Polska S.A., Raffinerie tirlemontoise and Saint Louis Sucre SA.

| 3. | The Kingdom of Spain, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Republic of Lithuania shall bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Kingdom of Spain, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Republic of Lithuania shall bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 113, 1.5.2010.

1

---
### SUBCHAPTER I–A—FAIR TRADE IN AUTOMOTIVE PARTS
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 519 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 519

    To amend certain appropriations Acts to repeal the requirement 
    directing the Administrator of General Services to sell Federal 
  property and assets that support the operations of the Plum Island 
            Animal Disease Center in Plum Island, New York.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 14, 2019

    Mr. Blumenthal (for himself, Mr. Murphy, Mr. Schumer, and Mrs. 
  Gillibrand) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend certain appropriations Acts to repeal the requirement 
    directing the Administrator of General Services to sell Federal 
  property and assets that support the operations of the Plum Island 
            Animal Disease Center in Plum Island, New York.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Plum Island Conservation Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT TO SELL CERTAIN FEDERAL PROPERTY IN PLUM 
              ISLAND, NEW YORK.

    (a) Repeal of Requirement in Public Law 110-329.--Section 540 of 
the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2009 (division 
D of Public Law 110-329; 122 Stat. 3688) is repealed.
    (b) Repeal of Requirement in Public Law 112-74.--Section 538 of the 
Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2012 (6 U.S.C. 190 
note; division D of Public Law 112-74) is repealed.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cambridge Heart, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended
December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, David A. Chazanovitz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
that:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                                             
|-------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------
|Date: March 30, 2005 |  | /S/ DAVID A. CHAZANOVITZ                    
|                     |  | David A. Chazanovitz Chief Executive Officer
For:  B+H
      Ocean
      Carriers Ltd.





From:  Navinvest
      Marine Services (USA) Inc.


The
      Sail
      Loft


19
      Burnside Street


Bristol,
      RI 02809








**FOR
      IMMEDIATE RELEASE**





**B+H
      Ocean Carriers, Ltd. Announces Revised Unaudited Results for the First Quarterly
      Period Ended March 31, 2007**





NEW
      YORK,
      NEW YORK, May
      16,
      2007 .
      . . .
      B+H Ocean Carriers Ltd. (AMEX: BHO) reported that unaudited net income for
      the
      three months ended March 31, 2007 was understated by $0.4 million in the
      earnings announcement released on May 11, 2007. Revised unaudited net income
      was
      $3.1 million or $0.44 per share.





The
      previously released net income figure of $2.7 million or $0.38 per share (basic
      and diluted) reflected losses of $1.0 million from changes in the market value
      of put option contracts which were entered into to mitigate the risk associated
      with changes in charter rates. These losses were comprised of $0.6 million
      for
      the three months ended March 31, 2007 and additional losses of $0.4 million
      for
      the month of April, 2007. The cumulative total loss was inadvertently booked
      from the statement for April 2007.





Safe
      Harbor Statement





Certain
      statements contained in this press release, including, without limitation,
      statements containing the words “believes,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,”
and words of similar import, constitute “forward-looking statements” as defined
      in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 or by the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission in its rules, regulations and releases, regarding the
      Company’s financial and business prospects. Such forward-looking statements
      involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause
      the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company, or industry
      results, to be materially different from any future results, performance or
      achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such
      factors include, but are not limited to, those set forth in the Company’s Annual
      Report and filings with the Securities and Exchange Committee. Given these
      uncertainties, undue reliance should not be placed on such forward-looking
      statements. The Company disclaims any obligation to update any such factors
      or
      to publicly announce the result of any revisions to any of the forward-looking
      statements contained or incorporation by reference herein to reflect future
      events or developments.





#
      #
      #








For
      further information, including the Company’s latest Annual Report on Form 20F,
      access the Company’s website:  www.bhocean.com





Company
      Contact:   John
      LeFrere


917.225.2800
2015 CROP YEAR

IRRIGATED WHEAT

YIELD EXCLUSION (YE)

Gulf of Mexico

Atlantic

Ocean

Pacific

Ocean

-130° -120° -110° -100° -90° -80° -70° -60°

45° 40° 35° 30° 25°

Coordinate System: Albers

Central Meridian: 96°0'0"W

1st Std Parallel: 20°0'0"N

2nd Std Parallel: 60°0'0"N

Latitude of Origin: 40°0'0"N

Metadata:

County Files - US Census Tiger

Files 2013

YE Coverage - USDA - RMA

December 2014

0 125 250 500 750 1,000

Miles

STATEMENT

The Maps produced represent

the number of years (since 1995)

eligible for yield exclusion for the

2015 crop year.

Document Path: K:\APH\Irrigated\Wheat\IrrigatedWheat.mxd

TABLE Links directly to the Commodity

table (double click)

Number of Years Eligible for

Yield Exclusion (YE)

0 years

1 year

2 to 4 years

5 to 7 years

8 to 10 years

11 to 15 years

Wheat - Depicts only those counties with

a November 30th filing date.

0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000

Miles
Exhibit 32

Certification

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:

> 
(1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Inland Monthly Income Fund II, L.P. (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;

(2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(3) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inland Monthly Income Fund II, L.P.

 

By: Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation      General Partner

/S/ Kelly Tucek________________________

Name: Kelly TucekTitle: Assistant Vice President of the General Partner and         principal financial officer of Inland Monthly Income Fund II, L.P.

Date: November 12, 2003
### SUBCHAPTER I—UNITED STATES GLOBAL CHANGE RESEARCH PROGRAM
RUS FORM 793 REV 4-2016

OMB FORM 0572-0041

Exp. Date: 11/30/2022

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

RURAL UTILITIES SERVICE

REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF LIEN 

AND/OR APPROVAL OF SALE

1. DATE OF THIS REQUEST 2. CLOSING DATE

3. SYSTEM DESIGNATION OF 

SELLER

4. SYSTEM DESIGNATION OF 

INSTRUCTIONS - Submit three copies to RUS. See RUS Bulletin 415-1 PURCHASER (If RUS borrower)

for detailed instructions.

5. NAME AND ADDRESS OF SELLER 6. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PURCHASER

7. APPROXIMATE ORIGINAL COST 8. SOURCE OF FUNDS (Original 

purchase)

9. DATE BOUGHT OR BUILT 10. PROPOSED SELLING PRICE

11. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY TO BE SOLD. (Identify it adequately and estimate its present value. If real estate, include legal description to be used in deed 

and release of lien.)*

12. FORMAL RELEASE OF LIEN IS IS NOT REQUIRED BY PURCHASER.

13. REASON FOR SALE*

14. DISPOSITION OF NET PROCEEDS OF SALE. (Insert estimated amounts in appropriate spaces):

a. ACCOUNT 113.2 OR 1600.2 ''CASH - TRUSTEE RUS CONSTRUCTION FUND'' TO BE USED FOR 

RUS APPROVED PURPOSES 

b. TO THE RURAL ELECTRIFICATION ADMINISTRATION AS A SPECIAL PAYMENT ON THE MOST RECENT 

NOTE OF THE RUS LOAN. MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO THE RURAL UTILITIES SERVICE MAIL TO U. S. 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. RUS, WASHINGTON, D.C. 20250-1510 ATTENTION OF:

ADMINISTRATIVE & LOAN ACCOUNTING BRANCH, COLLECTIONS & CUSTODIAL SECTION 

c. OTHER

d. SELLERS NOTE(S) TO BE ASSUMED. (For sale of property by assumption of indebtedness only) 

SYSTEM DESIGNATION DATE OF NOTE(S) AMOUNT OF NOTE(S) AMOUNT TO BE ASSUMED

CERTIFICATION

I hereby certify that, in my opinion, the selling price is not less than the fair market value of the property; the system after the sale will be 

financially feasible for repayment of RUS loan funds and will constitute a satisfactory operating unit; all necessary approvals have been or will be 

obtained where required by law or by the articles of incorporation or by-laws of the organization; the sale is in the best interest of the Government and 

this organization; and the transaction will provide the Government with a compensating benefit for its approval.

Two certified copies of the resolution adopted by the Directors Shareholders Members authorizing 

the proposed sale are attached if such authorization isrequired.

SELLER'S CORPORATE NAME

TITLE OF AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZEDOFFICIAL

According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, an agency may not conduct or sponsor and a person is not required to respond to a collection of 

information unless a valid OMB control number is displayed. The OMB Control Number for this information collection is 0572-0041. The time required 

to complete the information collection is estimated to average 8 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing

data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information.” 

Clear Form *If additional space is needed, use reverse side.
### §1525. Cooperation and direct communication between the court and foreign courts or foreign representatives

(a) Consistent with section 1501, the court shall cooperate to the maximum extent possible with a foreign court or a foreign representative, either directly or through the trustee.

(b) The court is entitled to communicate directly with, or to request information or assistance directly from, a foreign court or a foreign representative, subject to the rights of a party in interest to notice and participation.

(Added Pub. L. 109–8, title VIII, §801(a), Apr. 20, 2005, 119 Stat. 143.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 180 days after Apr. 20, 2005, and not applicable with respect to cases commenced under this title before such effective date, except as otherwise provided, see section 1501 of Pub. L. 109–8, set out as an Effective Date of 2005 Amendment note under section 101 of this title.
§ 327.7 Products for importation; movement prior to inspection; handling; bond; assistance. ( a ) No product required by this part to be inspected shall be moved, prior to inspection from any port, or, if arriving by water from the wharf where first unloaded, to any place other than the place designated by, or in accordance with, this part as the place where the same shall be inspected.
( b ) No product required by this part to be inspected shall be conveyed, prior to inspection, from any port, or, if arriving by water, from the wharf where first unloaded, in any manner other than in compliance with this part.
( c ) No product required by this part to be inspected shall be delivered to the consignee or his agent prior to inspection, unless the consignee shall furnish a bond, in form prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury, conditioned that the product shall be returned, if demanded, to the collector of the port where the same is offered for clearance through the customs.
( d ) The consignee or his agent shall provide such assistance as Program inspectors may require for the handling and marking of product offered for entry.
[35 FR 15610, Oct. 3, 1970, as amended at 37 FR 21928, Oct. 17, 1972; 51 FR 37707, Oct. 24, 1986; 56 FR 65180, Dec. 16, 1991]
MAINTENANCE MANUAL

INSPECTION DATE REPAIRS NEEDED REPAIRED (Y/N)