alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 11

                    M. H. MEYERSON & CO., INC.
                 STATEMENT OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


Year ended January 31, 1997

Shares outstanding during the year ended January 31, 1997:

4,983,335 shares from February 1 to May 7 1996           97 days  483,383,495
4,993,335 shares from May 8, 1996 to January 31, 1997  269 days 1,343,207,115
                                                        366     1,826,590,610

1,826,590,610 shares divided by 366 days = 4,990,685 average shares outstanding.
Earnings year ended January 31, 1997 = $1,819,963
Basic earnings per share = $1,819,963/4,990,685 = $0.36

Equivalent shares using the modified treasury stock method:

268,000 options, exercise price $1.00         268,000  1.00    $    268,000
205,000 options, exercise price $1.10         205,000  1.10    $    225,500
90,000 options, exercise price $2.25            90,000 2.25    $    202,500
200,000 options, exercise price $2.1875       200,000  2.1875  $    437,500
12,500 options, exercise price $2.50            12,500 2.50    $     31,250
300,000 options, exercise price $3.50         300,000  3.50    $  1,050,000
Less: shares assumed to be purchased         (545,169)         $ (2,214,750)
                                              530,331          $          0


Total weighted average outstanding shares: 4,990,685 + 530,331 = 5,521,016
Earnings - year ended January 31, 1997 = $1,819,963
Diluted earnings per share = $1,819,963 / 5,521,016 = $0.33 earnings per share.


<PAGE>
                    
                 M. H. MEYERSON & CO., INC.
             STATEMENT OF EARNINGS PER SHARE (CONT.)


Year ended January 31, 1998

Shares outstanding during the year ended January 31, 1998:

4,993,335 shares from February 1 to February 12, 1997      12 days   59,920,020
4,995,335 shares from February 13 to February 24, 1997     12 days   59,944,020
5,000,335 shares from February 25 to April 1, 1997         36 days  180,012,060
5,030,335 shares from April 2 to May 22, 1997              51 days  256,547,085
5,035,335 shares from May 23 to August 13, 1997            83 days  417,932,805
5,042,835 shares from August 14, 1997 to January 12, 1998 152 days  766,510,920
5,047,835 shares from January 13 to January 31, 1998       19 days   95,908,865
                                                          365     1,836,775,775

1,836,775,775 shares divided by 365 days = 5,032,262 average shares outstanding.
Loss year ended January 31, 1998 = $(1,719,464)
Basic and diluted loss per share = $(1,719,464)/5,032,262 = $(0.34)

Calculation of equivalent shares was not included as it would be anti-dilutive.
§ 1314.3 Authority of Reserve Banks. ( a ) Each Reserve Bank is hereby authorized as fiscal agent of TVA to perform the following functions with respect to the issuance of Book-entry TVA Power Securities offered and sold by TVA to which this part 1314 applies, in accordance with the Securities Documentation, Reserve Bank Operating Circulars, this part 1314, and procedures established by the Secretary of the United States Treasury consistent with these authorities: ( 1 ) To service and maintain Book-entry TVA Power Securities in accounts established for such purposes;
( 2 ) To make payments with respect to such securities, as directed by TVA;
( 3 ) To effect transfer of Book-entry TVA Power Securities between Participants' Security Accounts as directed by the Participants;
( 4 ) To perform such other duties as fiscal agent as may be requested by TVA.
( b ) Each Reserve Bank may issue Reserve Bank Operating Circulars not inconsistent with this part 1314, governing the details of its handling of Book-entry TVA Power Securities, Security Entitlements, and the operation of the Book-entry System under this part 1314.
[62 FR 920, Jan. 7, 1997, as amended at 62 FR 29288, May 30, 1997]
#### § 77.38 Interstate movement from herds that are not accredited, qualified, or monitored.

The Administrator may, with the concurrence of the cooperating State animal health officials of the State of destination, and upon request in specific cases, permit the movement of captive cervids not otherwise provided for in this part which have not been classified as reactors and are not otherwise known to be affected with tuberculosis, under such conditions as the Administrator may prescribe in each specific case to prevent the spread of tuberculosis. The Administrator shall promptly notify the appropriate cooperating State animal health officials of the State of destination of any such action.
EXHIBIT 23



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation of our report included in this Form 10-K into the
Company's previously filed Registration Statements File Nos. 33-
89930, 33-62386, 33-42757, 33-42759, 33-19528 and 2-93739.

                               ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
 

Minneapolis, Minnesota,
 May 27, 1997
§ 53.4 Destruction of animals or eggs. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, animals infected with or exposed to disease shall be killed promptly after appraisal and disposed of by burial or burning, unless otherwise specifically provided by the Administrator, at his or her discretion. In the case of animals depopulated due to spring viremia of carp or infectious salmon anemia, salvageable fish may be sold for rendering, processing, or any other purpose approved by the Administrator. The proceeds gained from the sale of the fish will be subtracted from any payment from APHIS for which the producer or owner is eligible under § 53.2(b) or § 53.11.
( b ) Eggs infected with, exposed to, or contaminated by highly pathogenic avian influenza shall be disposed of pursuant to the regulations in this part under the supervision of an APHIS employee who shall prepare and transmit to the Administrator a report identifying all eggs disposed thereof.
( c ) The killing of animals and the burial, burning, or other disposal of carcasses of animals pursuant to the regulations in this part shall be supervised by an APHIS employee who shall prepare and transmit to the Administrator a report identifying the animals and showing the disposition thereof.
[28 FR 5935, June 13, 1963, as amended at 56 FR 51974, Oct. 17, 1991; 67 FR 67095, Nov. 4, 2002; 68 FR 42569, July 18, 2003; 69 FR 27827, May 17, 2004; 71 FR 56323, Sept. 26, 2006; 81 FR 6750, Feb. 9, 2016]
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 18

- 00439

- CR

J UAN M ANUEL H ERRERA

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 371st District Court

of Tarrant Co un ty (1510492D)

August 26, 2019

Opinion by Justice Womack

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Dana Womack

Justice Dana Womack
#### George Streat, Respondent, v. Alfred Wolf, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Ho opinion.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 22-0632

_________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

LORENZO JAMES HARRIS,

 Defendant and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Appellant Lorenzo James Harris was granted an extension of time to file and serve 

the opening brief on or before June 28, 2024. The opening brief is now overdue.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Appellant shall prepare, file, and serve the 

opening brief on appeal no later than August 9, 2024. Failure to file the brief within that 

time will result in dismissal of this appeal with prejudice and without further notice. 

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to all parties. 

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 9 2024

07/09/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0632
§ 82.24 Other interstate movements and special permits. ( a ) A special permit is required for the interstate movement of items whose movement interstate is restricted under this subpart in a manner or to a destination other than is specifically prescribed by this subpart. A special permit is required for the disinfection of vehicles, premises, cages, coops, containers, troughs, and other equipment by a method other than is specifically prescribed by this subpart. To apply for a special permit, contact the veterinarian in charge for the State in which the items are located. The Administrator may, at his or her discretion, issue special permits if he or she determines the activity authorized will not increase the risk of spreading chlamydiosis interstate.
( b ) The special permit will list the name and address of the person to whom the special permit is issued, and the special conditions under which the interstate movement, or cleaning and disinfection, may be carried out. ( 1 ) For an interstate movement, the special permit will also include the following: ( i ) The name and mailing address of the person who will receive the items;
( ii ) The addresses of both the origin and destination of the items;
( iii ) The number and type of items to be moved interstate; and
( iv ) The reason for the interstate movement.
( 2 ) For cleaning and disinfection, the special permit will also include the following: ( i ) The address of the place where the items are located; and
( ii ) The number and type of items involved.
( c ) For an interstate movement, a copy of the special permit must accompany the items moved, and copies must be submitted so that a copy is received by both the State animal health official and the veterinarian in charge for the State of destination within 72 hours of the arrival of the items at the destination listed on the special permit.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0116)
128 STAT. 2112 PUBLIC LAW 113–225—DEC. 16, 2014 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5030: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 160 (2014): 

Sept. 8, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 8, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 113–225 

113th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 13500 

SW 250 Street in Princeton, Florida, as the ‘‘Corporal Christian A. Guzman 

Rivera Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. CORPORAL CHRISTIAN A. GUZMAN RIVERA POST OFFICE 

BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 13500 SW 250 Street in Princeton, Florida, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘Corporal Christian A. Guzman 

Rivera Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any references in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Corporal Christian A. Guzman Rivera Post Office Building’’. 

Approved December 16, 2014. 

Dec. 16, 2014 

[H.R. 5030] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLAWS
### §1503a. Under Secretary of Commerce for Economic Affairs

There shall be in the Department of Commerce an Under Secretary of Commerce for Economic Affairs who shall be appointed by the President by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. The Under Secretary shall perform such duties as the Secretary of Commerce shall prescribe.

(Pub. L. 97–195, §1(a), June 16, 1982, 96 Stat. 115.)
**Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 November 2010 – Victoria Sánchez v Parliament and Commission**

**(Case T-61/10)**

Action for failure to act – Failure to adopt measures – Application for directions to be issued – Request for protective measures – Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly devoid of any basis in law

1.                     *Procedure – Application initiating proceedings – Formal requirements – Brief summary of the pleas in law on which the application
is based (Statute of the Court of Justice, Arts 21, first para., and 53, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the General Court,
Art. 44(1)(c)) (see paras 27-31)*

2.                     *Actions for failure to act – Natural or legal persons – Actionable omissions (Art. 265, third para., TFEU) (see paras 32-38)*

3.                     *Actions for failure to act – Jurisdiction of the EU judicature – Direction issued to an institution – Not permissible (Art.
265, second para., TFEU) (see para. 41)*

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | APPLICATION for a declaration of failure to act on the part of the European Parliament and the European Commission in that those institutions unlawfully failed to respond to the applicant’s letter of 6 October 2009, an application for directions to be issued and a request for protective measures. |

**Operative part**

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | The action is dismissed. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Mr Fernando Marcelino Victoria Sánchez is ordered to pay the costs. |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 3. | | There is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene of Mr Ignacio Ruipérez Aguirre and the ACT Petition Association. |
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1
 
                          WESTERN NATIONAL CORPORATION
 
               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
              FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, 1995 AND 1994
                             (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               1996      1994      1995
                                                              ------    ------    ------
<S>                                                           <C>       <C>       <C>
Income before income taxes..................................  $152.9    $  8.8    $114.1
Add fixed charges:
  Interest expense on annuities and financial products......   381.7     364.9     344.2
  Interest expense on investment borrowings.................    11.1       9.2       7.3
  Interest expense on notes payable.........................    10.7      10.7       9.6
                                                              ------    ------    ------
     Fixed charges..........................................   403.5     384.8     361.1
                                                              ------    ------    ------
     Adjusted earnings......................................  $556.4    $393.6    $475.2
                                                              ======    ======    ======
     Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(1)..................   1.38x     1.02x     1.32x
                                                              ======    ======    ======
     Ratio of earnings to fixed charges, excluding interest
      expense on annuities and financial products(2)........   8.01x     1.44x     7.75x
                                                              ======    ======    ======
</TABLE>
 
---------------
 
(1) For purposes of this ratio, "fixed charges" consist of interest expense on
    annuities, financial products, investment borrowings and notes payable, and
    "earnings" consist of income before income taxes plus the fixed charges, as
    defined.
 
(2) For purposes of this ratio, "fixed charges" consist of interest expense on
    investment borrowings and notes payable, and "earnings" consist of income
    before income taxes plus the fixed charges, as defined.
Note to Docket 

Scott Jackson 

December 19, 2011 

Email communication was received from Roland C. Hea, CDPHE Permitting Section Supervisor, 

to EPA Region 8 dated November 18, 2011. This email explains four different instances where 

CDPHE, under its existing NSR program, approved an alternate representative baseline period 

of emissions for facilities. Colorado’s approval of these more representative baseline emissions 

is consistent with federal regulations, in particular, the definition of “actual emissions,” under the

pre-NSR Reform Rule. A phone conversation with Dena Wojtach, CDPHE Regulatory 

Compliance and Support Unit Supervisor, about the EPA’s usage of the email from Mr. Hea 

took place on December 19, 2011. EPA explained that we intended to use the instances to 

demonstrate that the option of using an alternative, more representative period was valid under 

the existing NSR program and that the option had been exercised.
# C_2011013EN.01003001.xml

| 15.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/30

---

Action brought on 1 November 2010 — Fruit of the Loom v OHIM — Blueshore Management (FRUIT)

(Case T-514/10)

()

2011/C 13/58

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Fruit of the Loom, Inc. (Bowling Green, USA) (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister, and V. G. Marsland, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Blueshore Management SA (Cernusco Sul Naviglio, Italy)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 30 August 2010 in case R 1686/2008-4; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 30 August 2010 in case R 1686/2008-4; and

| — | Order the defendant and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to bear the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to bear the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which an application for revocation has been made: The word mark ‘FRUIT’ for goods in classes 18, 24 and 25 — Community trade mark registration No 745216

Registered Community trade mark in respect of which an application for revocation has been made:

Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The applicant

Proprietor of the Community trade mark:

Party applying for revocation: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Party applying for revocation:

Decision of the Cancellation Division: Revoked the Community trade mark in part

Decision of the Cancellation Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: The applicant claims that the contested decision infringes Article 15(1) of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal failed to take account of (i) the presentation and significance of the word ‘FRUIT’ within the marks shown in the proprietor’s evidence of use, (ii) the evidence that the proprietor informally marketed its products under the name ‘FRUIT’, often using that mark verbally in dealings and transactions with its customers, and (iii) the evidence that the proprietor had used the mark ‘FRUIT’ as part of its marketing website.

Pleas in law:

---
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.25
The WhiteWave Foods Company Director Compensation Policy
(effective January 1, 2016)


The WhiteWave Foods Company (“WhiteWave”) provides the compensation described below to its non-employee directors.  WhiteWave’s directors who are full-time employees of WhiteWave receive no additional compensation for service as a WhiteWave director. 


Cash and Equity Retainers
Annual Retainer: 
		
	•
	$100,000 cash, payable quarterly, in arrears, on a pro rata basis


		
	•
	WhiteWave equity with a value of $120,000, which may be granted in the form of stock options or restricted stock units (“RSUs”), or a combination of both, at the election of the director 




Lead Director Retainer:  The non-employee director appointed as the lead director, if applicable, shall receive an additional annual cash retainer of $25,000, payable quarterly in arrears on a pro rata basis.


Committee Chair Retainer: The non-employee director appointed as the Chairperson of each of the Audit, Governance, and Compensation Committees shall receive an additional annual cash retainer, paid quarterly in arrears on a pro rata basis, of:
		
	•
	Audit Committee:  $15,000


		
	•
	Compensation Committee:  $15,000


		
	•
	Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (or any other Committee of the Board):  $10,000




Option to Receive Equity in Lieu of Cash Compensation:  All or any portion of the compensation that otherwise would be paid to a director in cash may, at the written election of the director, be taken in the form of restricted stock awards (the “RSAs”) or RSUs with a value equal to 150% of the amount of the cash retainer specified by the director.  If a director makes this election, he or she will receive RSAs or RSUs for shares of common stock with a value equal to 150% of the cash amount owed to him or her, determined as of the date of grant based on the closing price of WhiteWave common stock on the date of grant.


Terms of Equity Awards
All equity awards - RSUs, stock options and RSAs - will vest in full (100%) on the one-year anniversary of the grant date.  Unvested RSAs have full voting and distribution rights from the date of grant.   


Equity awards granted to non-employee directors will be issued pursuant to the 2012 Stock Incentive Plan and will be subject to the terms and conditions of such Plan and the applicable award notices and agreements.


Medical Benefits
Non-employee directors are eligible for medical benefits under WhiteWave’s health and welfare plans and these plans will be made available to them, without subsidy on the part of WhiteWave, during the annual open enrollment period applicable to WhiteWave’s U.S. employees.