alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32-2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax Credit Fund IV, L.P., Series 2 (the “Partnership”) for the years ended March 31, 2011, 2010, 2009 and 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Melanie R. Wenk, Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership’s general partner, hereby certify that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that such provisions require the audit report of Local Limited Partnership financial statements to refer to the auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board for the Partnership’s annual financial statements and except that the Report is a cumulative report covering each of the years ended March 31, 2011, 2010, 2009 and 2008 and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.











/s/Melanie R. Wenk


Melanie R. Wenk


Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.





Date:November 15, 2011
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2

STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERREGARDING FORM 10-Q FOR QUARTER ENDINGSEPTEMBER 30, 2002

I, Stephanie Schmitt, Chief Financial Officer of Specialty Trust, Inc.
(the Company), hereby state, certify and attest in this written statement that:

(a)  The quarterly report of the Company filed on form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)  The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|                                                      |  |                                       
|----------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|/s/ Stephanie Schmitt                                 |  | Dated this 19th day of November, 2002.
|                                                      |  |                                       
|Name: Stephanie SchmittTitle: Chief Financial Officer |  |
Exhibit 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Foamex  International  Inc. on Form 10-K
for the period ended January 1, 2006 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Thomas E. Chorman,  President
and Chief Executive Officer of Foamex  International Inc., certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operations  of Foamex
     International Inc.


/s/ Thomas E. Chorman
-------------------------------------
Thomas E. Chorman
President and Chief Executive Officer
April 3, 2006
# C_2010195EN.01002701.xml

| 17.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 195/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 195/27

---

Action brought on 12 May 2010 — ratiopharm v OHIM — nycomed (ZUFAL)

(Case T-222/10)

2010/C 195/42

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ratiopharm GmbH (Ulm, Germany) (represented by: S. Völker, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: nycomed GmbH (Konstanz, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 12 March 2010 in Case R 874/2008-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 12 March 2010 in Case R 874/2008-4;

| — | Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant.

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘ZUFAL’ for goods in Class 5.

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: nycomed GmbH

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community word mark ‘ZURCAL’ for goods in Class 5 and three national word marks ‘ZURCAL’ for goods in Class 5.

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: The opposition was upheld.

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: The appeal was dismissed.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, (1) since there is no likelihood of confusion between the opposing marks.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

1

---
**EXHIBIT 10.2**

----

**CERTIFICATION OF****EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION****PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Jean-Jacques Gauthier, Executive Vice President Finance of Lafarge, a *société anonyme* organized under French law, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Lafarge on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, to my knowledge, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Lafarge as of the dates and for the periods set forth therein.

Date: April 25, 2003

|   | By:    | /s/ Jean-Jacques Gauthier        |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------|
|   | Name:  | Jean-Jacques Gauthier            |
|   | Title: | Executive Vice President Finance |
|   |   |                             |
|   |   |                             |
|   |   |                             |
|   |   |                             |
|   |   |                             |
|   |   |                             |

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Lafarge and will be retained by Lafarge and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

38

----
### §§4291, 4292. Repealed. Pub. L. 102–555, §4, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 4166

Section 4291, Pub. L. 98–365, title VII, §701, July 17, 1984, 98 Stat. 466, related to prohibition of commercialization of weather satellites.

Section 4292, Pub. L. 98–365, title VII, §702, July 17, 1984, 98 Stat. 467, required repeal of chapter prior to any action with respect to the commercialization of weather satellites.
(No. 31312.)

#### The City of Chicago, Appellant, *vs.*The Willett Company, Appellee.

*Announced September 11, 1951.*

Mr. Justice Fueton

delivered the announcement of the court:

Pursuant to the order entered by the United States; Supreme Court in the cause of *City of Chicago*v. *The Willett Company,*(No. 493, October term, 1950, of said court,) requesting a clarification of our opinion in the same cause, reported in 406 Ill. 286, as to whether or not a decision of a Federal question was necessary, the basis for the opinion in said cause is as follows:

*Osborne*v. *Florida,*164 U.S. 650, and *Pullman Co.*v. *Adams,*189 U.S. 420, hold that only when a separation, in fact, of intrastate and interstate business exists a like separation may be recognized between the control of the State and that of the nation to apply a tax such as proposed here. The burden of proving inseparability is on him who asserts that, although actually within, the traffic is legally outside the State; that unless the interstate character is established, locality determines the question of jurisdiction. *(Pennsylvania Railroad Co.*v. *Knight,*192 U.S. 21.) *Sprout*v. *South Bend,*277 U.S. 166, holds that in order that the fee or tax be valid it must appear that it is imposed solely on account of the intrastate business; that the amount exacted does not increase because of the interstate business done; and that the person taxed could discontinue the intrastate business without withdrawing also from the interstate business.

The sole evidence in the cause, to which fact situation the above rules of law had to be applied, was to the effect that the Willett Company is not able to separate intrastate from interstate and intercity business, nor can it keep records of such business or degrees of business, nor can it *481continue in any one of its operations without giving up its entire business. The city did not contradict, oppose or challenge this evidence either by introducing evidence in opposition thereto or by cross-examining the witnesses to challenge their veracity.

Our decision is that the Chicago carters ordinance is valid, but, in light of the rules of the foregoing cases, could not be applied to the Willett Company because of the uncontradicted evidence which removes the Willett Company from an application of the license tax.
#### Bernard Nadler and Israel Cohen, Appellants, v. Morris Gordon and Nathan Blum, Respondents. (Actions 1 and 2.)

Judgments of the Municipal Court affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Woodward, Jenks, Gaynor, - Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred.
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Seeks Applications to Help Build and Repair Household Water Systems in 

Rural Communities

WASHINGTON, June 21, 2022 – U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Under Secretary for Rural 

Development Xochitl Torres Small today announced that USDA is seeking applications for grants from 

qualified nonprofit organizations to create revolving loan funds and provide sub-grants to help rural 

homeowners finance individually-owned household water well and wastewater systems.

USDA is making the funds available under the Rural Decentralized Water Systems Grant program. Through 

this program, USDA awards grants to qualified nonprofit organizations or Tribal lending institutions to provide 

affordable loans or sub-grants to low-income homeowners who need assistance constructing, refurbishing, or 

servicing household water well or wastewater systems. The loans made to the homeowner include a maximum 

20-year term with a one-percent interest rate. 

USDA is offering priority points to projects that advance key priorities under the Biden-Harris Administration 

to help communities recover from the COVID-19 pandemic, advance equity, and combat climate change. These 

extra points will increase the likelihood of funding for projects that will advance these key priorities in rural 

America.

Applications must be submitted electronically using Grants.gov no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on 

July 31, 2022.

If you’d like to subscribe to USDA Rural Development updates, visit our GovDelivery subscriber page. 

###

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender.
攜手共進,美國繁榮昌盛

2021年美國救助計畫法案

該計畫是做什麼

的?

2021年美國救助計畫(ARPA)法

案為美國農業部農村發展部的單戶

住房直接貸款計畫提供了額外資

金。ARP期限從2021年5月17日開

始,額外資金將持續到2023年9月30

日。

ARP的主要重點是幫助已獲得

COVID-19相關付款暫停(停止每

月貸款還款的時期)的現有單戶住

房直接借款人為其抵押貸款再融

資。目標是説明確保一旦暫停期結

束,美國農業部借款人的付款仍然

負擔得起。

誰有資格?

農村發展將接受現有單戶住房直接貸款

借款人——包括擁有房屋維修貸款的客

戶——的申請,以對已批准COVID-19

暫停的貸款進行再融資。

對於單戶住房直接貸款借款人,調整後

的家庭收入必須等於或低於該地區的中

等收入限額。對於房屋維修貸款借款

人,調整後的家庭收入必須等於或低於

該地區的極低收入限額。收入限額可以

在這裡查看:

https://www.rd.usda.gov/sites/default/

files/RD-DirectLimitMap.pdf

除拖欠的聯邦債務外,申請再融資的

單戶住房直接貸款借款人將不受信用

分析、標準還款率要求、資產限額或

與房產狀況相關的習慣計畫標準的約

束。

可用期限是多久?

• 對於單戶住房直接借款人,可以使

用10年、25年、30年或33年的期

限。在有限的情況下,可以提供38

年的期限。

• 對於房屋維修借款人,可以

使用20年期限。

再融資可能有哪些好處?

較低的利率和期限延長可以幫助減少貸

款支付,使其更實惠。

借款人需要支付任何費用嗎?

成交費用(與房地產交易相關的費用)

可以包含在貸款中。原始帳戶的託管帳

戶將轉移到ARP再融資貸款中。如果需

要建立託管帳戶,您將負責獲得危險保

險單的費用,該保險單可以包含在貸款

中。

再融資可以包括哪些內容?

• 欠美國農業部農村發展部的債務。

在某些條件下,這包括單戶住房補

貼。有關補助回收的其他資訊,請

點擊此處:

https://www.rd.usda.gov/sites/default/

files/fact-sheet/508_RD_FS_RHS_

SubsidyRecaptureDirectLoans.pdf

• 在有限的情況下,與單戶住房直接貸

款計畫的債務無關的留置權

• 在有限的情況下,進行維修以糾正

家庭中的主要健康和安全問題

• 成交費用

• 農村發展授權貸款
接下來我需要做什麼?

• 現有單戶住宅直接貸款借款人訪問

https://pubmai.sc.egov.usda.gov

下載應用套裝程式。您也可以聯繫

您當地的辦事處進行申請或獲取更

多資訊。州辦事處地點可在以下網

址找到: https://

rd.usda.gov/about-rd/state-offices.

• 如果您對現有貸款有疑問——包括

其重新攤銷或補貼收回——請致電

1-800-414-1226聯繫客戶服務中心

(CSC)。

在哪裡可以找到更多資訊?

• 借款人可以訪問美國農業部農村發

展單戶住房美國救助計畫法案

(ARPA)網頁(可通過此連結獲

得:https://go.usa.gov/xteKW),

瞭解ARPA如何提供幫助。

• 要查看與此計畫相關的內部農村

發展實施指南,請訪問:

2021年美國救助計畫法案
注:由於資訊可能會發生變化,因此請始終

查閱官方計畫說明或聯繫您當地的農村發展

辦公室尋求幫助。您可以在以下連結找到其

他表單、資源和計畫資訊:rd.usda.gov。

美國農業部是提供機會均等的雇主和貸方。

2022年4月最新更新

• https://www.rd.usda.gov/resources/directiv

es/unnumbered-letters,然後從功能表中

選擇“住房計畫”。

• 您可以在以下連結找到其他表單、資源

和計畫資訊:https://www.rd.usda.gov/

programs-services/all-programs/

single-family-housing-programs.

• 您當地的農村住房計畫工作人員始終是

一個很好的資源。我們位於州的辦公地

點可以在這裡找到:

https://rd.usda.gov/about-rd/stateoffices
§ 3.168 Climatic and environmental conditions during transportation. ( a ) ( 1 ) Transportation of all live birds shall be done in a manner that does not cause overheating, excessive cooling, or adverse environmental conditions that could cause discomfort or stress. When climatic or environmental conditions, including temperature, humidity, exposure, ventilation, pressurization, time, or other environmental conditions, or any combination thereof, present a threat to the health or well-being of a live bird, appropriate measures must be taken immediately to alleviate the impact of those conditions. The different climatic and environmental factors prevailing during a journey must be considered when arranging for the transportation of and when transporting live birds. Corrections may include, but would not be limited to: ( i ) The temperature and humidity level of any enclosure used during transportation of live birds must be controlled by adequate ventilation or any other means necessary;
( ii ) Appropriate care must be taken to ensure that live birds are not subjected to prolonged drafts detrimental to their health or well-being;
( iii ) Appropriate care must be taken to ensure that live birds are not exposed to direct heat or cold if detrimental to their health or well-being; and
( iv ) During prolonged air transit stops in local climatic conditions that could produce excessive heat for live birds held in aircraft compartments, the aircraft doors must be opened and, if necessary, equipment must be used to control the condition of the air within compartments containing live birds.
( 2 ) In order to determine what climatic and environmental conditions are appropriate for a live bird, factors such as, but not limited to, the bird's age, species, physiological state, last feeding and watering, and acclimation shall be considered when such information is available.
( b ) Birds that are not able to maintain a constant body temperature at ambient temperatures must be transported in a brooder or other temperature-regulating unit that effectively assists the bird in maintaining a constant body temperature during transport. ( 1 ) The temperature of the brooder or other temperature-regulating unit must be monitored during transportation and appropriate for the live bird.
( 2 ) Written instructions for the temperature requirements of birds transported in brooders or other temperature-regulating units must be securely affixed to the outside of the primary enclosure used for transporting the bird. The instructions must be attached in accordance with § 3.162(f) in a manner that makes them easily noticed and read.
§ 1301.22 Definitions. For purposes of §§ 1301.21 to 1301.34: ( a ) The *Act* means section 3 of the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a;
( b ) The terms *individual, maintain, record, system of records, statistical record,* and *routine use* have the meaning provided for by the Act;
( c ) The term *TVA system* means a system of records maintained by TVA;
( d ) The term *TVA system notice* means a notice of a TVA system published in the Federal Register pursuant to the Act. TVA has published TVA system notices about the following TVA systems: Apprentice Training Records—TVA. Personnel Files—TVA. Discrimination Complaint Files—TVA. Work Injury Illness System—TVA. Employee Accounts Receivable—TVA. Health Records—TVA. Payroll Records—TVA. Travel History Records—TVA. Employment Applicant Files—TVA. Grievance Records—TVA. Employee Supplementary Vacancy Announcement Records—TVA. Consultant and Contractor Records—TVA. Nuclear Quality Assurance Personnel Records—TVA. Questionnaire—Land Use Surveys in Vicinity of Proposed or Licensed Nuclear Power Plant—TVA. Radiation Dosimetry Personnel Monitoring Records—TVA. Retirement System Records—TVA. Energy Program Participant Records—TVA. OIG Investigative Records—TVA. Call Detail Records—TVA. Project/Tract Files—TVA. Section 26a Permit Application Records—TVA. U.S. TVA Police Records—TVA. Wholesale, Retail, and Emergency Data Files—TVA. Nuclear Access Authorization and Fitness for Duty Records—TVA.
( e ) The term *appellant* means an individual who has filed an appeal pursuant to § 1301.29(a) from an initial determination refusing to amend a record on request of the individual;
( f ) The term *reviewing official* means TVA's Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer (or incumbent of a successor position), or another TVA official designated by the Senior Vice President in writing to decide an appeal pursuant to § 1301.29;
( g ) The term *day,* when used in computing a time period, excludes Saturdays, Sundays, and legal public holidays.
[40 FR 45313, Oct. 1, 1975. Redesignated at 44 FR 30682, May 29, 1979, and amended at 53 FR 30252, Aug. 11, 1988; 56 FR 9288, Mar. 6, 1991; 57 FR 33634, July 30, 1992; 57 FR 59803, Dec. 16, 1992; 75 FR 11736, Mar. 12, 2010; 81 FR 88999, Dec. 9, 2016. Redesignated and amended at 82 FR 51757, Nov. 8, 2017]
# C_2010195EN.01002901.xml

| 17.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 195/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 195/29

---

Action brought on 21 May 2010 — Couture Tech Limited v OHMI (representation of an escutcheon containing the globe, a star, the hammer and sickle)

(Case T-232/10)

2010/C 195/46

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Couture Tech Ltd (Tortola, British Virgin Islands) (represented by: B. Whyatt, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 5 March 2010 in case R 1509/2008-2; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 5 March 2010 in case R 1509/2008-2; and

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: A figurative mark in colour representing an escutcheon with the globe, a star, the hammer and sickle for goods and services in classes 3, 14, 18, 23, 26 and 43 — Community trade mark application No 5585898

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the examiner: Refused registration of the application for a Community trade mark

Decision of the examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: The applicant advances two pleas in law in support of its application

Pleas in law:

On the basis of its first plea, the applicant claims that the contested decision infringes Articles 7(1) and 7(2) of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal wrongly applied these articles to the Community trade mark application

By its second plea, the applicant considers that the contested decision fails to apply the rules of natural justice by not recognising the applicant's right to legitimate expectations that its Community trade mark application would be registered.

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alliance Laundry Systems LLC, Alliance Laundry Corporation and
Alliance Laundry Holdings LLC (the Companies) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bruce P. Rounds, Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|/s/ BRUCE P. ROUNDS                    
|Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

November 13, 2007
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 20 2 3

- 1928

_____________________________
R ANDY J ACKSON , Appellant,

v.

R ICKY D. D IXON , Secretary of Department of Corrections
, Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Hamilton County

. Fred L. Koberlein, Jr. , Judge

. May 14, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , M.K. T HOMAS , and N ORDBY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Randy Jackson, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Anne C. Conley , Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee

.