alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 354.71 Affixing of official identification. ( a ) No official identification or any abbreviation, copy, or representation thereof may be affixed to or placed on or caused to be affixed to or placed on any product or container thereof except by an inspector or under the supervision of an inspector. All such products shall have been inspected and certified. The inspector shall have supervision over the use and handling of all material bearing any official identification.
( b ) Each container of inspected and certified products to be shipped from one official plant to another official plant for further processing shall be marked for identification and shall show the following information: ( 1 ) The name of the inspected and certified products in the container;
( 2 ) The name and address of the packer or distributor of such products;
( 3 ) The net weight of the container;
( 4 ) The inspection mark permitted to be used pursuant to the regulations in this part unless the containers are sealed or otherwise identified in such manner as may be approved by the Administrator; and
( 5 ) The plant number of the official plant where the products were packed.
### §4121. Definitions of qualified and priority purchaser and related party rule

#### (a) Priority purchaser

The term "priority purchaser" means (A) a resident council organized to acquire the housing in accordance with a resident homeownership program that meets the requirements of section 4121 1 of this title; and (B) any nonprofit organization or State or local agency that agrees to maintain low-income affordability restrictions for the remaining useful life of the housing (as determined under section 4112(d) 2 of this title).

#### (b) Qualified purchaser

The term "qualified purchaser" means any entity that agrees to maintain low-income affordability restrictions for the remaining useful life of the housing (as determined under section 4112(c) of this title), and includes for-profit entities and priority purchasers.

#### (c) Related parties

Except as provided in subsection (d), the terms "qualified purchaser" and "priority purchaser" do not include any entity that, either directly or indirectly, is wholly or partially owned or controlled by the owner of the housing being transferred under this subchapter, is under whole or partial common control with such owner, or has any financial interest in such owner or in which such owner has any financial interest. The Secretary shall issue any regulations appropriate to implement the preceding sentence.

#### (d) Management exception

A qualified purchaser shall not be precluded from retaining as a property management entity a company that is owned or controlled by the selling owner or a principal thereof if retention of the management company is neither a condition of sale nor part of consideration paid for sale and the property management contract is negotiated by the qualified purchaser on an arm's length basis.

(Pub. L. 100–242, title II, §231, as added Pub. L. 101–625, title VI, §601(a), Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4273; amended Pub. L. 102–550, title III, §317(a)(6), Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 3772.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 102–550 substituted "4112(c)" for "4112(d)".

1 So in original. Probably should be section "4116".

2 So in original. Probably should be section "4112(c)".
# C_2012006EN.01001303.xml

| 7.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/13

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 November 2011 — El Coto de Rioja v OHIM — Álvarez Serrano (COTO DE GOMARIZ)

(Case T-276/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Figurative Community mark COTO DE GOMARIZ - Prior Community word marks COTO DE IMAZ and EL COTO - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2012/C 6/22

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: El Coto de Rioja, SA (Oyón, Spain) (represented by: J. Grimau Muñoz and J. Villamor Muguerza, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: María Álvarez Serrano (Gomariz Leiro, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 28 April 2010 (Case R 1020/2008-4) concerning invalidity proceedings between El Coto de Rioja, SA and Ms María Álvarez Serrano.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 28 April 2010 (Case R 1020/2008-4) in so far as the assessment of the Board of Appeal as to the similarity of the signs in question is incorrect; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 28 April 2010 (Case R 1020/2008-4) in so far as the assessment of the Board of Appeal as to the similarity of the signs in question is incorrect;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the action; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the action;

| 3. | Orders OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders OHIM to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 234, 28.8.2010.

1

---
SUBJECT: 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Rural Electrification Administration 

BULLETIN 1753F-205(PE-39) 

RD-GD-1993-12

REA Specification tor Filled Telephone Cables

TO: All Telephone Borrowers 

REA Telephone Staff 

EFFECTIVE DATE: June 21, 1993. 

EXPIRATION DATE: Date of change in 7 CFR §1755.390 by 

rulemaking. 

OFFICE OF PRIMARY INTEREST: outside Plant Branch, 

Telecommunications Standards Division. 

PREVIOUS INSTRUCTIONS: This bulletin replaces REA Bulletin 345-

67, REA Specification for Filled Telephone Cables, PE-39, issued 

January 2, 1987. 

FILING INSTRUCTIONS: Discard REA Bulletin 345-67, REA 

Specification for Filled Telephone Cables, PE-39, dated 

January 2, 1987, and replace with this bulletin. 

PURPOSE: This specification covers REA requirements for filled 

telephone cables intended for direct burial installation either 

by trenching or by direct plowing, for underground application by 

placement in a duct, or for aerial installation by attachment to 

a support strand. This bulletin is a reformat of the text 

codified in 7 CFR 1755.390 published at 58 FR 29336, dated May 

20, 1993. 

Every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this 

document. However, in case of discrepancies, the regulations at 

7 CFR 1755.390 are the authorized sources. 

fe//L 

/1c rr N c,. Administrator 

Disclaimer: The contents of this guidance document does not have 

the force and effect of law and is not meant to bind the public in any 

way. This document is intended only to provide clarity to the public 

regarding existing requirements under the law or agency policies.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                          5
<MULTIPLIER>                                       1
<CURRENCY>                                         U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                       MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                    1
<CASH>                                                 397,515
<SECURITIES>                                         1,021,884
<RECEIVABLES>                                          304,568
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                          5,170,118
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     6,057,119
<PP&E>                                               1,682,009
<DEPRECIATION>                                        (981,936)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       9,593,906
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                5,728,069
<BONDS>                                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                             3,521,593
<OTHER-SE>                                             878,615
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         9,593,906
<SALES>                                              3,942,575
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     3,942,575
<CGS>                                                3,097,959
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        3,097,959
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       830,172
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      30,532
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         38,183
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     38,183
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                            38,183
<EPS-BASIC>                                               0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0.01



</TABLE>
### §2432. Internal review

Each department, agency, and independent establishment of the Federal Government, in coordination with the Center, shall study and review the promulgation and implementation of its statutory authority, policies, and regulations, and shall identify such statutes, policies, and regulations which adversely affect productivity growth in the public or private sectors of the United States, or those which impede the efficient functioning of the Nation's economy, and shall recommend to the President and the Congress, or implement where appropriate, alternative statutes, policies, and regulations which will contribute to the achievement of the purposes of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 94–136, title III, §302, Nov. 28, 1975, 89 Stat. 740.)
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000835663
<NAME> THE GLENMEDE FUND
<SERIES NUMBER> 9
[NAME] LARGE CAP VALUE PORTFOLIO
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       12 MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR END>                  31-Oct-99
<PERIOD-END>                       31-Oct-99
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                  54,426,211
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                 59,108,875
<RECEIVABLES>                           2,396,164
<ASSETS-OTHER>                              4,037
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         61,509,076
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                  884,331
<OTHER-ITEMS LIABILITIES>               1,446,741
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                     2,331,072
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>               54,174,506
<SHARES-COMMON-CURRENT>                 5,264,364
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                   5,659,366
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                   4,843
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                   315,991
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                        0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                4,682,664
<NET-ASSETS>                           59,178,004
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                         961,721
<INTEREST-INCOME>                          57,352
<OTHER-INCOME>                              2,137
<EXPENSES-NET>                             92,716
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                   928,494
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>               11,038,346
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>               1,102,108
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                  13,068,948
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>               1,001,562
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>               11,060,260
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                           0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                   519,388
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>             1,933,918
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                     1,019,528
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                 (7,442,335)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                    94,330
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                 321,486
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                         0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                      0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                           0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                            92,716
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                   72,483,755
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                       11.77
<PER-SHARE-NII>                              0.18
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                      2.00
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                         0.19
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                    2.52
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                         0.00
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                          11.24
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                              0.13%



</TABLE>
Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinionsho uld not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except und er the limit ed circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 09- 10488 C onfer enc e Cal endar

UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee

v. J O S E C O R R E R A -S A L IN A S , D e fe nda nt
- Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e N ort h ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 3: 08- C R

- 313- 1

B e fo r e K IN G , J O L L Y , a n d S O U T H W IC K , C ir c u it J u d g e s . P E R C U R I A M: * T h e F ederalP u bl i c D efen der app oi n t ed to represent Jose C orrer a- S al i n as has m o ve d f

o rl e av e t o w i t hdr aw and has f i l e d a b r i e f

i n a c c o r da nc e w i t h A n d ers v . C a lif o rn ia , 38 6 U
. S. 73 8 ( 19 67 )
. Cor r e r a- Sal i nas has no t f i l e d a r e s po ns e . Our i nde pe nde ntr e vi e w o f t he r e c o r d a nd c o uns e l ’ s b r i e f di s c l o s e s no no nf

r i vo l o us is s u e fo ra p p e a l. A c c o r d i n g ly , co u n s e l’ s m o tio n fo rle a v e to w ith d r a w is GRANTED, c o u n s e l i s e x c u s e d f r o m f u r t h e r r e s p o n s ib i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a nd t he A P P E A L IS D IS M IS S E D
. S ee 5 T H C IR . R. 42. 2. United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D December

15, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk
### §161. Quinquennial censuses; inclusion of certain data

The Secretary shall take, compile, and publish for the year 1957 and for every fifth year thereafter a census of governments. Each such census shall include, but shall not be limited to, data on taxes and tax valuations, governmental receipts, expenditures, indebtedness, and employees of States, counties, cities, and other governmental units.

(Aug. 31, 1954, ch. 1158, 68 Stat. 1021; Pub. L. 85–207, §12, Aug. 28, 1957, 71 Stat. 483.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 13, U.S.C., 1952 ed., §251 (Sept. 7, 1950, ch. 910, §1, 64 Stat. 784).

Section was derived from subsection (a) of section 251 of title 13, U.S.C., 1952 ed. For remainder of such section 251, see Distribution Table.

Reference to the year 1957 was substituted for reference to the year 1952, since the latter reference is now obsolete.

Changes were made in phraseology.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1957—Pub. L. 85–207 struck out "in the United States and in such of its Territories and possessions as may be determined by the Secretary" in last sentence. Geographical provisions now covered by section 191 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000
<CURRENCY>                               U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                              57
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      322
<ALLOWANCES>                                         7
<INVENTORY>                                        523
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   953
<PP&E>                                             561
<DEPRECIATION>                                     347
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,755
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,041
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                        (141)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,755
<SALES>                                            552
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   549
<CGS>                                              283
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      777
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  25
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (327)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (327)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (327)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.03)
        


</TABLE>
128 STAT. 2072 PUBLIC LAW 113–205—DEC. 16, 2014 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 78: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 160 (2014): 

Sept. 8, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 8, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 113–205 

113th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 4110 Almeda 

Road in Houston, Texas, as the ‘‘George Thomas ‘Mickey’ Leland Post Office 

Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. GEORGE THOMAS ‘‘MICKEY’’ LELAND POST OFFICE 

BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 4110 Almeda Road in Houston, Texas, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘George Thomas ‘Mickey’ Leland 

Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘George Thomas ‘Mickey’ Leland Post Office Building’’. 

Approved December 16, 2014. 

Dec. 16, 2014 

[H.R. 78] 


srobinson on DSKB307YQ1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
# C_2010274EN.01000603.xml

| 9.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 274/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 274/6

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 6 July 2010 — Gebr. Stolle GmbH & Co. KG v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas

(Case C-326/10)

()

2010/C 274/09

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Finanzgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Gebr. Stolle GmbH & Co. KG

Applicant:

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Does a poultry carcase come under CAP Goods List number 0207 1290 9990 (1) even if a part of the poultry that is not permitted under that product code adheres to giblets that are permitted? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does a poultry carcase come under CAP Goods List number 0207 1290 9990 (1) even if a part of the poultry that is not permitted under that product code adheres to giblets that are permitted?

1

| 2. | If the answer to the first question should be in the negative: when a customs office examines whether export products comply with the CAP Goods List number stated in the export declaration is a margin of error to be allowed so that a so-called ‘anomaly’ is not detrimental to a refund? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the answer to the first question should be in the negative: when a customs office examines whether export products comply with the CAP Goods List number stated in the export declaration is a margin of error to be allowed so that a so-called ‘anomaly’ is not detrimental to a refund?

---

(1)  OJ 1998 L 322, p. 31.

1

---
#### John Finck, Appellant, v. Oliver E. Cromwell, Respondent.

Judgment and order affirmed, With costs. Ho opinion.
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

78-8 

June 16, 1978 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4022 Benefits Guaranteed

29 CFR 2605. Guaranteed Benefits 

OPINION: 

 This is in response to your letter enclosing an inquiry from your constituent, * * *, to * * *, * * *, Division of

Benefits Administration, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (the "PBGC"). Inasmuch as this manner presently is

under consideration by this Office, * * * has forwarded your letter to this Office. 

* * *, a participant in the Supplemental Agreement Covering Pensions by and between * * * * * * and Local (the

"Plan"), has applied for a disability benefit under the Plan, of which the PBGC is trustee. As you are aware, * * *

maintains that she was disabled as of June 1974. However, the Social Security Administration (the "SSA") has

determined that * * * was disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act as of May 1975. * * * eligibility for

a disability benefit turns on whether "before the date of plan termination she had satisfied the conditions of the [P]lan

necessary to establish the right to receive the benefit prior to such date other than application for the benefit, satisfaction

of a waiting period described in the plan, or retirement," in the language of the PBGC's Guaranteed Benefits Regulation,

[*2] 29 C.F.R. § 2605.5(a)(3) (1977). Inasmuch as the Plan terminated on August 31, 1974, * * * disability must have

arisen prior to that date in order for her to establish her eligibility for a disability benefit. Although the PBGC is not

necessarily bound by the SSA's finding as to the date of disability, the existence and rationale of that finding may affect

the evaluation by the PBGC of the additional evidence that may be available to substantiate * * * assertion of an earlier

disability date. 

 We regret the delay in our response to * * * application, and we will make every effort to expedite processing of

the case. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
Robert Bonnie

Robert Bonnie is the Under Secretary for Farm Production and Conservation at USDA. Prior to joining 

USDA, Bonnie was at Duke University first as a Rubenstein Fellow and later as an Executive in 

Residence at the Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions working on conservation and 

environmental issues in rural America. In 2020, Bonnie also worked with the Bipartisan Policy Center 

on its Farm and Forest Carbon Solutions Initiative. Bonnie was Under Secretary for Natural Resources 

and Environment at USDA from 2013 to 2017, and a senior advisor to Secretary Tom Vilsack from 2009 

to 2013. Prior to joining USDA, Robert was vice president for land conservation at Environmental 

Defense Fund where he focused on developing incentives to reward stewardship on private lands. Robert 

has master’s degrees from Duke in forestry and environmental management. He lives with his wife, Julie, 

and daughter, Lilly, in Loudoun County, Virginia.