alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 316.9 Products to be marked with official marks. ( a ) Each carcass that has been inspected and passed in an official establishment must be marked at the time of inspection with the official inspection legend containing the number of the official establishment, if the carcass is to be shipped into commerce from the establishment without further processing.
( b ) A passed and inspected carcass that is to be further processed in the slaughtering establishment need not be marked with the official inspection legend at the time of inspection.
( c ) Except as provided otherwise in § 316.8, each primal part of a carcass and each liver, beef tongue, and beef heart which has been inspected and passed shall be marked with the official inspection legend containing the number of the official establishment before it leaves the establishment in which it is first inspected and passed, and each such inspected and passed product shall be marked with the official inspection legend containing the number of the official establishment where it was last prepared. Additional official marks of inspection may be applied to products as desired to meet local conditions. Primal parts are the wholesale cuts of carcasses as customarily distributed to retailers. The round, flank, loin, rib, plate, brisket, chuck, and shank are primal parts of beef carcasses. Veal, mutton, and goat primal parts are the leg; flank, loin, rack, breast, and shoulder. The ham, belly, loin, shoulder, and jowl are pork primal parts. Equine primal parts are the round, flank, loin, rib, plate, brisket, chuck, and shank.
( d ) Beef livers shall be marked with the official inspection legend containing the number of the official establishment, at which the cattle involved were slaughtered, on the convex surface of the thickest portion of the organ.
( e ) Inspected and passed parts of carcasses which are not marked with the official inspection legend under this section shall not enter any official establishment or be sold, transported, or offered for sale or transportation, in commerce, except as provided in § 316.8.
[35 FR 15577, Oct. 3, 1970, as amended at 36 FR 23720, Dec. 14, 1971; 84 FR 9698, Mar. 18, 2019]
§ 1300.102 Gambling, betting, and lotteries. An employee shall not participate, while on Government- or TVA-owned or leased property or while on TVA duty, in any gambling activity including the operation of a gambling device, in conducting a lottery or pool, in a game for money or property, or in selling or purchasing a numbers slip or ticket. However, this section does not preclude activities: ( a ) Necessitated by an employee's law enforcement duties; or
( b ) Under section 7 of Executive Order 12353 (47 FR 12785, 3 CFR, 1982 Comp., p. 139) and similar TVA-approved activities.
# C_2007096EN.01001301.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/13

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 26 April 2007 — Alcon Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Biofarma SA

(Case C-412/05 P) (1)

1

(Appeals - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 8(1)(b) - Relative ground for refusal of registration - Likelihood of confusion - Article 43(2) and (3) - Genuine use - New plea - Word mark ‘TRAVATAN’ - Opposition by proprietor of earlier national trade mark ‘TRIVASTAN’)

(2007/C 96/20)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Alcon Inc. (represented by: G. Breen, solicitor, and J. Gleeson SC)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent) Biofarma SA (represented by: V. Gil Vega and A. Ruiz López, laywers)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 22 September 2005 in Case T-130/03 Alcon v OHIM dismissing an action for annulment brought by the applicant for the Community trade mark ‘TRAVATAN ’in respect of goods in Class 5 against Decision R 968/2001-3 of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 30 January 2003, which had dismissed the appeal brought against the decision of the Opposition Division refusing registration of that mark in the opposition proceedings brought by the proprietor of the national word mark ‘TRIVASTAN ’in respect of goods in Class 5

Alcon

OHIM

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Alcon Inc. to pay, in addition to its own costs, the costs of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM); |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Alcon Inc. to pay, in addition to its own costs, the costs of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM);

| 3. | Orders Biofarma SA to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Biofarma SA to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 60, 11.3.2006.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 49 (Monday, March 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13665-13666]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5659]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-74,605]


Cambridge Tool & Die, Including On-Site Leased Workers From 
Action Total Staffing, Cambridge, OH; Amended Certification Regarding 
Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(``Act''), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a 
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment

[[Page 13666]]

Assistance on January 13, 2011, applicable to workers of Cambridge Tool 
& Die, Cambridge, Ohio. The workers are engaged in the production of 
plastic injection molds. The notice was published in the Federal 
Register on January 26, 2011 (76 FR 4731).
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The company reports that 
workers leased from Action Total Staffing were employed on-site at the 
Cambridge, Ohio location of Cambridge Tool & Die Corporation. The 
Department has determined that these workers were sufficiently under 
the control of Cambridge Tool & Die Corporation to be considered leased 
workers.
    Based on these findings, the Department is amending this 
certification to include workers leased from Action Total Staffing 
working on-site at the Cambridge, Ohio location of Cambridge Tool & Die 
Corporation.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-74,605 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Cambridge Tool & Die, including on-site leased 
workers from Action Total Staffing, Cambridge, Ohio, who became 
totally or partially separated from employment on or after September 
7, 2009, through January 13, 2013, and all workers in the group 
threatened with total or partial separation from employment on the 
date of certification through two years from the date of 
certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under 
Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 2nd day of March, 2011.
Michael W. Jaffe,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011-5659 Filed 3-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
EXHIBIT 31.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Scott Gallagher, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report, as amended, of FTS GROUP, INC.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. As the small business issuer's certifying officer, I am responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006 that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. As the small business issuer's certifying officer, I have disclosed, based on
my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business
issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

         Date: December 18, 2006          /s/ Scott Gallagher
                                        -------------------------
                                        Scott Gallagher
                                        Chief Executive Officer and
                                        Interim Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Orthovita, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Antony Koblish,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursua33nt to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Antony Koblish

Antony Koblish
President and Chief Executive Officer
March 28, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5
       
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                       DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                             303,142 
<SECURITIES>                       0      
<RECEIVABLES>                      189,219  
<ALLOWANCES>                       0
<INVENTORY>                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   0
<PP&E>                             11,528,442     <F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                     426,458 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     11,602,782
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              116,924
<BONDS>                            0            
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0
<PREFERRED>                        0
<COMMON>                           11,485,858     <F2>
<OTHER-SE>                         0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       11,602,782  
<SALES>                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   1,359,923      <F3>
<CGS>                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      540,153        <F4>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 0 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    0
<INCOME-TAX>                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                0
<DISCONTINUED>                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0           
<CHANGES>                          0
<NET-INCOME>                       819,770
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      0
<EPS-DILUTED>                      0

<FN>
<F1>  "PP&E" REPRESENTS INVESTMENT IN REAL ESTATE [LAND AND
BUILDING]
<F2>   "COMMON" REPRESENTS TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
<F3>   "TOTAL REVENUES" REPRESENTS RENTAL, INTEREST, AND OTHER
INCOME
<F4>   "TOTAL COSTS" REPRESENTS TOTAL EXPENSES
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 4.BB




Exhibit 4.BB





  PROMISSORY NOTE

     

    of

     

    Battle Mountain Gold Inc. (“BMG”)

  FOR VALUE RECEIVED, BMG promises to pay to David Elliott of 200 Burrard Street, Suite 700, Vancouver, BC V6C 3L6 (“Lender”) the amount of $50,000.00 (fifty thousand dollars) plus interest at the rate of 6% (six per cent) per annum calculated from December 10, 2015 until the date or dates of repayment on a non-compounding basis not in advance, on the demand of the Lender provided cash funds of $400,000.00 or more have been received by BMG from the proceeds of one or more equity issuances by BMG prior to the time of the demand by the Lender.

  Executed this 9th day of December, 2015 on behalf of BMG by:

     

  

  Signed “Ian Brown”

  Ian Brown

    Chief Financial Officer

  (having the authority to bind BMG)

  E-680
### §2144. Regular Coast Guard; officers serving under temporary appointments

(a) Each officer of the Regular Coast Guard appointed under section 2104 of this title who is serving in the grade of lieutenant (junior grade) or lieutenant and who has failed of selection for promotion to the grade of lieutenant or lieutenant commander, respectively, for the second time shall:

(1) be honorably discharged on June 30 of the promotion year in which his second failure of selection occurs; or

(2) if he so requests, be honorably discharged at an earlier date without loss of benefits that would accrue if he were discharged on that date under clause (1); or

(3) if on the date specified for his discharge in this section he is eligible for retirement under any law, be retired under that law on that date.

(b) Each officer subject to discharge or retirement under subsection (a) may elect to revert to his permanent grade.

(Added Pub. L. 88–130, §1(10)(C), Sept. 24, 1963, 77 Stat. 184, §284; amended Pub. L. 94–546, §1(23), Oct. 18, 1976, 90 Stat. 2520; renumbered §2144 and amended Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §§112(b), 123(b)(2), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4216, 4240.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282, §112(b), renumbered section 284 of this title as this section.

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 115–282, §123(b)(2), substituted "section 2104" for "section 214" in introductory provisions.

1976—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 94–546 substituted "promotion year" for "fiscal year".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Retired Pay on or Prior to September 24, 1963

Savings provisions in section 5(g) of Pub. L. 88–130 providing that Pub. L. 88–130 does not affect the retired pay of anyone retired on or prior to Sept. 24, 1963, are set out as a note under section 2101 of this title.

#### Effectiveness of Election, Change, or Revocation of Election of Annuity

Savings provisions in section 5(h) of Pub. L. 88–130 providing that notwithstanding section 1431 of Title 10, Armed Forces, an election, change or revocation thereof affecting an annuity, by an officer retired under this section, is effective if made prior to the first day of the third month following September 1963, are set out as a note under section 2101 of this title.
### §275c. Cost recovery authority

Fees for calibration services, standard reference materials, and other comparable services provided by the National Institute of Standards and Technology shall be at least sufficient to meet the requirements set forth in the amendments made by subsection (a),1 and any funds recovered in excess of such requirements shall be returned to the Treasury of the United States.

(Pub. L. 99–73, §5(b), July 29, 1985, 99 Stat. 172; Pub. L. 100–418, title V, §5115(c), Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1433.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The amendments made by subsection (a), referred to in text, mean the amendments made by subsec. (a) of section 5 of Pub. L. 99–73, which amended section 278b(f) of this title.

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the National Institute and Technology Act which comprises this chapter.

#### Amendments

1988—Pub. L. 100–418 substituted "National Institute of Standards and Technology" for "National Bureau of Standards".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 99–73, §5(c), July 29, 1985, 99 Stat. 172, provided that: "The amendments made by subsection (a) [amending section 278b of this title] (and the provisions of subsection (b) [enacting this section]) shall be effective October 1, 1984."

1 See References in Text note below.
#### § 96.8 Uncertified casings; disinfection at seaboard port.

Uncertified foreign animal casings arriving at a seaboard port may be imported into the United States for use as food containers after they have been disinfected under the direct supervision of an APHIS inspector at the seaboard port.

[28 FR 5986, June 13, 1963, as amended at 57 FR 29785, July 7, 1992. Redesignated at 58 FR 47031, Sept. 7, 1993]
#### Marjorie Desinor, Appellant, v New York City Transit Authority, Respondent.

[823 NYS2d 680]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dye, J.), entered April 11, 2005, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendant and against her, dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

“[A] 11 litigants, regardless of the merits of their case, are entitled to a fair trial” *(Habenicht v R. K. O. Theatres,*23 AD2d 378, 379 [1965]; *see Salzano v City of New York,*22 AD2d 656 [1964]). “Inevitably a trial court sets the pattern for the jury” *522
      *(Livant v Adams,*17 AD2d 784 [1962]). A trial judge should “ ‘at all times maintain an impartial attitude and exercise a high degree of patience and forbearance’ ” *(Salzano v City of New York, supra*at 657, quoting *Buckley v 2570 Broadway Corp.,*12 AD2d 473 [1960]). A jury should be given an opportunity to consider the issues in “a fair, calm and unprejudiced manner” *(Salzano v City of New York, supra*at 656; *see Perkins v New York Racing Assn.,*51 AD2d 585 [1976]). Here, while we agree that some of the trial judge’s remarks were improper, reversal of the judgment is not warranted as the remarks did not divert the jurors’ attention from the issues to be determined with respect to liability or deprive the plaintiff of a fair trial *(cf. Pickering v Lehrer, McGovern, Bovis, Inc.,*25 AD3d 677 [2006]; *Vazquez v Costco Cos., Inc.,*17 AD3d 350 [2005]; *Matter of Travelers Indem. Co. v Mohammed,*14 AD3d 710 [2005]; *Ougourlian v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp.,*5 AD3d 644 [2004]).

The plaintiff’s remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J.E, Krausman, Mastro and Spolzino, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 578 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.578

                     One Hundred Sixteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and twenty

                                 An Act

 
To amend title II of the Social Security Act to eliminate the five-month 
 waiting period for disability insurance benefits under such title for 
             individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``ALS Disability Insurance Access Act 
of 2019''.
SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF WAITING PERIOD FOR SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY 
INSURANCE BENEFITS FOR DISABLED INDIVIDUALS WITH AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL 
SCLEROSIS (ALS).
    (a) In General.--Section 223(a)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 423(a)(1)) is amended in the matter following subparagraph (E) 
by striking ``or (ii)'' and inserting ``(ii) in the case of an 
individual who has been medically determined to have amyotrophic 
lateral sclerosis, for each month beginning with the first month during 
all of which the individual is under a disability and in which the 
individual becomes entitled to such insurance benefits, or (iii)''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
with respect to applications for disability insurance benefits filed 
after the date of the enactment of this Act.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```