alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON DC 

) 

National Business Aviation Association, ) 

Inc., et aL ) 

Complainants. ) 

v. 

Town of East Hampton and East 

Hampton Airport 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Respondent. ) 

FAA Docket No. 16-15-08 

ORDER 

On August 25,2015 counsel for Respondent, Town of East Hampton, New York, filed a Motion 

under 14 CPR§ 16.19(e), requesting an extension of time to October 8, 2015,2015, to file its 

Answer to the Complaint. 

Counsel advised that the Respondent needs additional time because of constrained resources to 

respond to the Complaint. Counsel advised that the Complainant does not oppose this extension. 

Part 16 is intended to expedite substantially the handling and disposition of airport-related 

complaints. See Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted Airports (Retrospective Regulatory 

Review) Final Rule, 78 Fed. Reg. 56135 (Sept. 12, 2013); Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted 

Airport Enforcement Proceedings Final Rule, 61 Fed. Reg. 53998 (Oct. 16, 1996). Parties may file 

a written motion for an extension of time. 14 CPR§ 16.19(e). The Director may issue an order 

extending any time period prescribed where necessary or appropriate for a fair and complete 

consideration of matters before the agency. 14 CPR§ 16.ll(a). 

An extension of time is reasonable under the circumstances. Accordingly, the Respondent is 

hereby granted an extension of time to submit an Answer to the Complaint. 

The Answer is now due on October 8, 2015. Complainant may file a Reply within 10 days of the 

date of service of the Answer. 

Ran all S. Fiertz, Director 

Office of Airport Compliance 

and Management Analysis 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on September _L, 2015, I caused to be emailed and placed in 

the United States mail (first class, postage paid) or personally delivered a true copy of the 

foregoing ORDER addressed to: 

Complainants 

Steve Brown 

Chief Operating Officer 

NATIONAL BUSINESS AVIATION ASSOCIATION, INC. 

1200 G Street NW 

Washington, D.C. 20005 

Counsel for Respondent 

Elizabeth Vail 

Town Attorney 

!59 Pantigo Road 

TOWN OF EAST HAMPTON 

East Hampton, NY 1193 7 

Evail@EHamptonNY.Gov 

W. Eric Pilsk 

Catherine van Heuven 

Kaplan Kirsch & Rockwell LLP 

1001 Connecticut Ave., NW, Suite 800 

Washington, D.C. 20036 

epilsk@kaplankirsch.com 

cvanheuven@kaplankirsch.com 

Telephone: (202) 955-5600 

Facsimile: (202) 955-5616 

Hand-Delivered to: 

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket (AGC-600) 

FAA Office of Airport Compliance and Management Analysis (AC0-100) 

Claudia Roberts 

Office of Airport Compliance
#### Gary Higgins *v.*Carl Robinson, Warden, Connecticut Correctional Institution, Somers, et al.

*James W. Greene, Jr.,*for the plaintiff.

*John F. Bianchi,*state’s attorney, for the defendants.

Argued February 7

decided February 7, 1974

The plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the appeal from the Superior Court in Hartford County is granted.
§ 88.6 Violations and penalties. ( a ) The Secretary is authorized to assess civil penalties of up to $5,000 per violation of any of the regulations in this part.
( b ) Each equine transported in violation of the regulations of this part will be considered a separate violation.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0160)
### §314. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Aug. 8, 1894, ch. 238, 28 Stat. 273, related to making promotions in service without prejudice to those transferred from Signal Service of War Department.
# C_2012138EN.01002701.xml

| 12.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/27

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2011 — Michael Heath v ECB

(Case F-121/10) (1)

(Civil Service - ECB Staff - Pension scheme - Pension plan - Annual pension increase - Harmonised index of consumer prices - Opinion of pension plan actuary - Consultation of staff committee - Consultation of oversight committee - Right to negotiate by collective agreement)

(2012/C 138/55)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Michael Heath (Southampton, United Kingdom) (represented by: L. Levi and M. Vandenbussche, lawyers)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: P. Embley and E. Carlini, agents, and B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

Application to annul the applicant’s pension slips for January 2010 and the following months, in so far as they apply a pension increase of 0.6% following the 2010 pension adjustment exercise, and compensation for the damage suffered by the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Heath to bear his own costs and to pay the costs of the European Central Bank. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Heath to bear his own costs and to pay the costs of the European Central Bank.

---

(1)  OJ C 30, 29.1.2011, p. 67.

---
### §2610. Prohibition of fees for preparation of truth-in-lending, uniform settlement, and escrow account statements

No fee shall be imposed or charge made upon any other person (as a part of settlement costs or otherwise) by a lender in connection with a federally related mortgage loan made by it (or a loan for the purchase of a mobile home), or by a servicer (as the term is defined under section 2605(i) of this title), for or on account of the preparation and submission by such lender or servicer of the statement or statements required (in connection with such loan) by sections 2603 and 2609(c) of this title or by the Truth in Lending Act [15 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.].

(Pub. L. 93–533, §12, Dec. 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 1729; Pub. L. 101–625, title IX, §942(b), Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4412.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Truth in Lending Act, referred to in text, is title I of Pub. L. 90–321, May 29, 1968, 82 Stat. 146, which is classified generally to subchapter I (§1601 et seq.) of chapter 41 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1601 of Title 15 and Tables.

#### Amendments

1990—Pub. L. 101–625 substituted present section catchline for "Fee for preparation of truth-in-lending and uniform settlement statements", inserted after first comma "or by a servicer (as the term is defined under section 2605(i) of this title),", and substituted "lender or servicer" for second reference to "lender" and "2609(c)" for "2605".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 180 days after Dec. 22, 1974, see section 20 of Pub. L. 93–533, set out as a note under section 2601 of this title.
### §2306. Service contracts; rules for full, clear and conspicuous disclosure of terms and conditions; addition to or in lieu of written warranty

(a) The Commission may prescribe by rule the manner and form in which the terms and conditions of service contracts shall be fully, clearly, and conspicuously disclosed.

(b) Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to prevent a supplier or warrantor from entering into a service contract with the consumer in addition to or in lieu of a written warranty if such contract fully, clearly, and conspicuously discloses its terms and conditions in simple and readily understood language.

(Pub. L. 93–637, title I, §106, Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2188.)
#     Marijuana

Marijuana, or cannabis, is the most commonly used illicit drug in the United States. SAMHSA data help behavioral health practitioners learn more about patterns of use, perceptions of marijuana itself, risk and protective factors, consequences of use, substance use economics, and treatment of marijuana use disorder. This information helps inform policymakers as states ponder legalization and medical marijuana laws.

### Categories Related to Marijuana

                      - Alcohol
                      - Illegal Drugs
                      - Pain Relievers
                      - Cocaine
                      - Any SUD
                      - Tobacco
                      - Alcohol Use Disorder
                      - Adolescents as Population Group
                      - Young Adults as Population Group
                      - Heroin
                      - Older Adults as Population Group
                      - Mature Adults as Population Group
                      - Illicit Stimulants
                      - Inhalants
                      - Hallucinogens

Latest In Marijuana

Reducing Substance Use Among Clients in the Pregnant and Postpartum Women Pilot Program

Spotlight, Evaluation : Other SAMHSA Data Set - February 28, 2024

2020 Methodological Summary and Definitions

Reference Material : National Survey on Drug Use and Health - October 25, 2021

2019 NSDUH Detailed Tables

Data Table : National Survey on Drug Use and Health - September 11, 2020

2018 NSDUH Detailed Tables

Data Table : National Survey on Drug Use and Health - August 20, 2019

2020 NSDUH Annual National Report

Annual Report : National Survey on Drug Use and Health - October 25, 2021

View All
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

PETER I. SHAH

,

Appellant

v.

MAPLE ENERGY HOLDINGS, LLC,

Appellee §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 22

- 00198

- CV

Appeal from the

143rd Judicial District Court

of Reeves County, Texas

(TC# 22

- 03

- 24342

- CVR )



### S UPPLEMENTAL 

### O PINION

In our opinion dated July 31, 2023, we suggested a remittitur of $9,738.00 of the attorney’s

fees awarded to Appellee Maple Energy. We stated that if Maple Energy filed a remittitur within

15 days from the date of the opinion, we would modify the judgment with respect to the award of

attorney’s fees, reducing the attorney’s fees award to $85,416.50, and affirming the trial court’s

judgment as modified.

On August 8, 2023, Maple Energy timely filed its consent to the suggestion of remittitur

and asked the Court to modify the trial court’s judgment to reflect an award of attorney’s fees in

the amount of $85,416.50. Accordingly, we vacate our judgment, but not our opinion, dated July

31, 2023, and modify the trial court ’ s judgment with respect to the award of attorney’s fees to

reflect the remittitur of $9,738.00. The trial court ’ s judgment is therefore modified to award MapleEnergy $85,416.50 in attorney’s fee s as the total money judgment in its favor. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

.

46.3. As modified, we affirm the trial court ’s judgment. This Court’s July 31, 2023 opinion

otherwise remains in effect.

L ISA J. SOTO

, Justice

August 31, 2023

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Palafox, and Soto, JJ.
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*William H. Stinger, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 73-61;

Second District

December 5, 1974.

*536Ralph Ruebner and Adam Lutynski, both of State Appellate Defenders Office, of Elgin, for appellant.

Gerry Dondanville, State’s Attorney, of Geneva (Clarence Wittenstrom, Jr., Assistant State’s Attorney, of counsel), for the People.

Opinion by

Mr. JUSTICE SEIDENFELD.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1039 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1039

                   For the relief of Renato Rosetti.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 13, 1999

  Mr. Nickles introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                   For the relief of Renato Rosetti.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for purposes of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Renato Rosetti 
shall be held and considered to have been lawfully admitted to the 
United States for permanent residence as of the date of the enactment 
of this Act upon payment of the required visa fee.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

    Upon the granting of permanent residence to Renato Rosetti as 
provided in this Act, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper 
officer to reduce by one number during the current fiscal year the 
total number of immigrant visas available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)).
                                 <all>
```
§ 1304.409 Indefinite or temporary moorage of recreational vessels. ( a ) Recreational vessels' moorage at unpermitted locations along the water's edge of any TVA reservoir may not exceed 14 consecutive days at any one place or at any place within one mile thereof.
( b ) Recreational vessels may not establish temporary moorage within the limits of primary or secondary navigation channels.
( c ) Moorage lines of recreational vessels may not be placed in such a way as to block or hinder boating access to any part of the reservoir.
( d ) Permanent or extended moorage of a recreational vessel along the shoreline of any TVA reservoir without approval under section 26a of the TVA Act is prohibited.
#### § 162.419 May a business lease allow compatible uses?

A business lease may provide for the Indian landowners to use, or authorize others to use, the leased premises for other uses compatible with the purpose of the business lease and consistent with the terms of the business lease. Any such use or authorization by the Indian landowners will not reduce or offset the monetary compensation for the business lease.
# C_2010274EN.01000602.xml

| 9.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 274/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 274/6

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 6 July 2010 — Doux Geflügel GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas

(Case C-325/10)

()

2010/C 274/08

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Finanzgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Doux Geflügel GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Do chickens under subheading 0207 12 10 (1) of the Combined Nomenclature have to be plucked without any residue or may some small quill feathers, plumage feathers, quill ends and hairs still be attached after going through a mechanical plucking process?

1

---

(1)  OJ 1999 L 338, p. 1.

1

---
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000835663
<NAME> THE GLENMEDE FUND
<SERIES NUMBER> 6
[NAME] SMALL CAP EQUITY PORTFOLIO ADVISOR CLASS
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       12 MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR END>                  31-Oct-99
<PERIOD-END>                       31-Oct-99
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                 262,920,946
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                282,597,473
<RECEIVABLES>                           2,421,592
<ASSETS-OTHER>                         11,425,527
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        296,444,592
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                2,795,249
<OTHER-ITEMS LIABILITIES>              11,836,885
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                    14,632,134
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>              246,942,009
<SHARES-COMMON-CURRENT>                16,848,660
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                  20,131,315
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                  63,737
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>               (20,551,930)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                        0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>               19,676,527
<NET-ASSETS>                          253,384,326
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                       6,537,099
<INTEREST-INCOME>                         267,097
<OTHER-INCOME>                             37,034
<EXPENSES-NET>                          2,743,477
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                 4,097,753
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>              (21,112,207)
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>              15,487,511
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                  (1,526,943)
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>               3,515,853
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                        0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                           0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                 3,451,858
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>             6,749,354
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                        10,063
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                (57,577,548)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                         0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                 281,484
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                         0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                      0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                           0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                         2,743,477
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                  288,813,461
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                       15.28
<PER-SHARE-NII>                              0.20
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                     (0.25)
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                         0.19
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                    0.00
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                         0.00
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                          15.04
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                              0.88%



</TABLE>
## Browse All Stories

### Start.Coop Launches Market-Ready Start-Ups by Scaling Out

[Read More]

03.07.2024

Cooperatives

### USDA Funding Helps Mitigate Fire Risk for Electric Co-op Service Area

[Read More]

02.29.2024

CooperativesElectricEnergySolar Energy

### Fertilizer Grant Increases Access for Growers in Rural Montana

[Read More]

02.28.2024

Cooperatives

### Cooperatives keep the lights on in Rural Communities

[Read More]

02.14.2024

CooperativesElectricRural Development

### Rural Community’s First Hospice Center

[Read More]

02.09.2024

BusinessCooperativesEconomic DevelopmentHealth CareRural Development

### Garbage Turned into Energy

[Read More]

02.09.2024

BusinessCooperativesRural DevelopmentSmall Business

### Engage Your Community With Investment Cooperatives

[Read More]

12.04.2023

BusinessCooperativesEconomic DevelopmentRural DevelopmentSmall Business

### Finding Common Ground: A Community Economic Development Project

[Read More]

11.20.2023

BusinessCooperativesEconomic DevelopmentRural DevelopmentSmall Business

### Good Things Come From Wisconsin’s ‘Valley’

[Read More]

10.23.2023

Cooperatives

### Small Farmers Think Big to Grow Markets for Southside Virginia Produce

[Read More]

10.12.2023

Cooperatives

-                Current page            1 
-                Page            2 
-                Page            3
§ 1301.54 Requirements for a demand for records or testimony. ( a ) *Service of demands.* Only TVA's General Counsel or his/her designee is authorized to receive and accept demands sought to be served upon TVA or its employees. All such documents should be delivered in person or by United States mail to the Office of the General Counsel, Tennessee Valley Authority, 400 W. Summit Hill Drive, Knoxville, Tennessee 37902.
( b ) *Time limit for serving demands.* The demand must be served at least 30 days prior to the scheduled date of testimony or disclosure of records, in order to ensure that the General Counsel has adequate time to consider the demand and prepare a response, except in cases of routine requests for personnel and payroll records located on-site in Knoxville, where service 15 days prior will normally be considered sufficient. The General Counsel may, upon request and for good cause shown, waive the requirement of this paragraph.
( c ) *Form of Demand.* A demand for testimony or production of records or other official information must comply with the following requirements: ( 1 ) The demand must be in writing and submitted to the General Counsel.
( 2 ) The demand must include the following information: ( i ) The caption of the legal proceeding, docket number, and name and address of the court or other authority involved.
( ii ) If production or records or other official information is sought, a list of categories of records sought, a detailed description of how the information sought is relevant to the issues in the legal proceeding, and a specific description of the substance of the records sought.
( iii ) If testimony is sought, a description of the intended use of the testimony, a detailed description of how the testimony sought is relevant to the issues in the legal proceeding, and a specific description of the substance of the testimony sought.
( iv ) A statement as to how the need for the information outweighs any need to maintain the confidentiality of the information and outweighs the burden on TVA to produce the documents or testimony.
( v ) A statement indicating that the information sought is not available from another source, from other persons or entities, or from the testimony of someone other than a TVA employee, such as a retained expert.
( vi ) The name, address, and telephone number of counsel to each party in the case.
( d ) *Additional information.* TVA reserves the right to require additional information to complete the request where appropriate or to waive any of the requirements of this section at its sole discretion.
§ 1301.25 Disclosure of requested information to individuals. ( a ) All disclosure and examination of records shall normally be made in the presence of a TVA representative. If an individual wishes to be accompanied by a third person of the individual's choosing when the record is disclosed, TVA may require the individual to furnish TVA, in advance of disclosure of the record, a statement signed by the individual authorizing discussion and disclosure of the record in the presence of the accompanying person. If desired by the individual, TVA shall provide copies of any documents reviewed in the record which are requested at the time of review. Fees shall be charged for such copies in accordance with the fee schedule in § 1301.31, and shall be payable prior to delivery of the copies to the individual.
( b ) Where permitted by § 1301.24, copies of an individual's record will be made available by mail. A charge for copies will be made in accordance with § 1301.31 of this part. All fees due shall be paid prior to mailing of the materials. However, if TVA is unable to allow in-person review of the record, the first copy will be made available without charge.
[40 FR 45313, Oct. 1, 1975. Redesignated at 44 FR 30682, May 29, 1979, and further redesignated and amended at 82 FR 51757, Nov. 8, 2017]
Order Issued November ~, 2012 

## 004

In The

No. 05-11-01501-CR No. 05-11-01502-CR 

### KEVIN CALDWELL, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F09-25227-W and F09-72926-W



### ORDER Before the Court is the State of Texas’s October 31, 2012 Motion for Extension of Time to File the State’s Brief. We GRANT the motion. The Clerk is directed to file the brief tendered by the State on October 31, 2012.

ROBERT M. FILLMORE PRESIDING JUSTICE