alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Shewmaker v. Commonwealth.

March 14, 1939.

K. S. Alcorn, Judge.

J. WALTER HARDESTY, CHARLES S. MATHERLY and ROY E. GRAVES for appellant.

HUBERT MEREDITH, Attorney General, and WM. F. NEIUL Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Opinion of the Court by

Stanley, Commissioner

Affirming.

John Shewmaker appeals from a judgment of conviction of grand larceny and a sentence of two years* imprisonment.

The indictment charges the appellant, his brothers, Herbert, Hobert and Henry Shewmaker, and Noah Shepherd, with the crime. It crudely, and perhaps insufficiently, charges the other three with aiding and abetting Herbert Shewmaker and Noah Shepherd in its commission.

The indictment is fatally defective in that it does not charge that the taking of the property was against the will or without the consent of the owner. Page v. Commonwealth, 235 Ky. 657, 32 S. W. (2d) 17; Maggard v. Commonwealth, 257 Ky. 414, 78 S. W. (2d) 815; Cohan v. Commonwealth, 262 Ky. 80, 89 S. W. (2d) 872.

There is no need to express an opinion as to the sufficiency of the evidence of guilt to take the case to the jury or to sustain the verdict.

Judgment reversed.
**UNITED
      STATES**


**SECURITIES
      AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION**


**Washington,
      D.C. 20549**




FORM
      6-K





**Report
      of Foreign Issuer**




**Pursuant
      to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of** **the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934**







**For
      the month of March, 2007**


**Commission
      File No. 1-9987**













B
      + H  O C E A N C A R R I E R S, L T D.













3rdFloor,
      Par La Ville Place


**14
      Par-La-Ville Road**


**Hamilton
      HM JX Bermuda**


(Address
      of principal executive offices)

















Indicate
      by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under
      cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.





Form
      20-F X   Form
      40-F





Indicate
      by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted
      by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1):




Indicate
      by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted
      by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7):





Indicate
      by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this Form,
      the
      registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant
      to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.





Yes    NoX







INFORMATION
      CONTAINED IN THIS FORM 6-K REPORT







Set
      forth
      herein as Exhibit 99.1 is a Press Release Announcing First Quarter
      Earnings

















**Signatures**








Pursuant
      to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
      has
      duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
      duly authorized.







Date  May
      14, 2007


B+H
      Ocean Carriers, Ltd.


By:  /s/
      Michael S. Hudner


Chief
      Executive Officer
[No. 8058.]

#### READ ET AL. V. MEREDITH ET AL.

*Error to Denver District Cowrt.*Hon. John II. Denison, Judge.

*Dismissed.*

Messrs. McKnight & Henry, Mr. Carlisle A. Ferguson, and Mr. M. H. Farrington, for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. W. H. Bryant, Mr. J. A. Marsh, and Mr. W. H. Malone, for defendants in error.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         1,401,089
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      30,539
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               1,431,628
<CASH>                                          12,475
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              30,618
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         171,098
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,913,164
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 75,417
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            595,196
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                130,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        700
<COMMON>                                       695,993
<OTHER-SE>                                     178,933
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,913,164
<PREMIUMS>                                     109,511
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             72,085
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                              11,522
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   9,303
<BENEFITS>                                       9,156
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     27,962
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            35,755
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                129,548
<INCOME-TAX>                                    34,864
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             94,684
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    94,684
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.06
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                  72,079
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                              5,400
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                7,361
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                               2,850
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                 6,573
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                 75,417
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0



</TABLE>
## The Alabama Court of Civil Appeals

NATHAN P. WILSON 300 DEXTER AVENUE LYNN DEVAUGHN CLERK MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36104-3741 ASSISTANT CLERK TELEPHONE 334-229-0733 October 4, 2024 CL-2023-0315 Earnest Coprich v. Bessie Elizabeth Jones (Appeal from Montgomery Circuit Court: CV-21-900720).

ORDER You are hereby notified that the following action was taken in the above cause by the Court of Civil Appeals: Application for Rehearing Overruled. No opinion written on rehearing. Moore, P.J., and Edwards, Hanson, Fridy, and Lewis, JJ., concur.

Nathan P. Wilson, Clerk
#### § 147.1 Blood testing procedures.

Blood testing must be conducted in a manner approved by the Administrator. Approved blood testing procedures are listed in the NPIP Program Standards, as defined in § 147.51. Blood testing procedures may also be approved by the Administrator in accordance with § 147.53(d)(1).

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0007)

[79 FR 38766, July 9, 2014]
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

87-4 

February 26, 1987 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4041(a)(3) Termination by Plan Administrator

(SEPPAA) - Violation of Collective Bargaining Agreement 

OPINION: 

This is in response to your request that the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) suspend the termination

of the plan named above because ". . . the collective bargaining agreement between the * * * and * * * provides that the

* * * Pension Plan shall continue in full force and effect. The Union construes this language to mean that the * * *

Pension Plan will continue to be effective and applicable during the term of the collective bargaining agreement which

does not expire until * * * October 31, 1987." 

According to Section 4041(a)(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, as amended by the SingleEmployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1986 (ERISA) -- 

[the PBGC] shall not proceed with a termination of a plan under this section if the termina tion would violate the

terms and conditions of an existing collective bargaining agreement. 

The PBGC believes that the question of whether a particular termination violates the terms and conditions of a particular

collective bargaining agreement should be decided in accordance with applicable labor-management relations law [*2]

and practice. Therefore, in order for the PBGC to suspend a termination pursuant to section 4041(a)(3) of ERISA, the

PBGC must be advised timely and in writing that a formal challenge has been initiated asserting that the termination

violates an existing collective bargaining agreement. A formal challenge would include the commencement of any

procedure specified in the collective bargaining agreement for resolving disputes under the agreement; the filing of a

charge with the National Labor Relations Board alleging an unfair labor practice under section 8 of the National Labor

Relations Act; or the commencement of an action under section 301 of the National Labor Relations Act in a court of

competent jurisdiction. Your letter does not indicate that a formal challenge has been initiated asserting that termination

of the * * * Plan would violate an existing collective bargaining agreement. 

In the case of a standard termination, evidence that such a formal challenge has been initiated must be received by

the PBGC before the expiration of the 60-day period that ERISA section 4041(b)(2)(C) provides for the PBGC to review

the standard termination. This 60-day review period begins on [*3] the date on which the PBGC receives a complete

standard termination notice for the plan. The PBGC has not received a complete standard termination notice for the plan

named above as of the date of this letter. 

In the case of a distress termination, evidence that a formal challenge has been initiated must be received by the

PBGC before the PBGC makes the determinations relating to sufficiency or insufficiency in accordance with ERISA

section 4041(c)(3)(A). As of the date of this letter, the PBGC has not received notice of a proposed distress termination

and so has not made these determinations. 

John H. Falsey 

Acting General Counsel
Exhibit
32.2  Certification of the Chief
Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the
Quarterly Report of KBW, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report),
I, Robert Giambrone, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:  (1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.  Dated:
  December 15, 2006/s/ ROBERT GIAMBRONERobert Giambrone
  Chief Financial Officer   
 *
  
  The
  foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
  1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
  document.  1
| || |

Enter Keywords

Choose

Website

Online Publications

Order Publications

National Library of Medicine

National Academies Press

Publications Homepage

printer friendly page

e-mail this page

bookmark this page

shopping cart

current or new account

Cómo ayudar a los niños a enfrentar el miedo y la ansiedad

En situaciones en que las tragedias afectan a su familia de modo personal o llegan a su hogar por la prensa y la

televisión, usted puede ayudar a los niños a controlar la ansiedad que pueden causar & tratar la violencia, la muerte y

los desastres.

Anime a los niños a hacer preguntas. Escuche lo que dicen. Dé a los pequeños consuelo y confianza para

miedos específicos. Está bien admitir que no puede responder a todas sus preguntas.

Hable a su nivel. Comuníquese con sus hijos de una forma que puedan entender. No les dé explicaciones

técnicas ni complicadas.

Encuentre lo que les da miedo. Anime a los niños a hablar de otros miedos que puedan tener. Los niños se

pueden preocupar de que alguien les haga daño en la escuela o que alguien intente hacerle daño a usted.

Acentúe lo positivo. Insista en que la mayor parte de la gente es amable y cariñosa. Recuérde a su hijo las

acciones heróicas de gente corriente para ayudar a víctimas de tragedias.

Dé atención a los niños. Los juegos y dibujos de los niños pueden darle información sobre sus preguntas y

preocupaciones. Pídales que le digan lo que está pasando en el juego o en el dibujo. Es una buena ocasión

para aclarar cualquier malentendido, responder a preguntas y darles confianza.

Haga un plan. Tenga un plan de emergencias para la familia para el futuro, como por ejemplo un lugar de

encuentro donde todos deben reunirse si algo inesperado ocurre a su familia o en su barrio. Esto puede

ayudarle a usted y a sus hijos a sentirse más seguros.

Para aprender más sobre la salud mental de los niños:

1.800.789.2647

(Línea gratis)

KEN-01-0099

Updated 01/05

Home | Contact Us | About Us | Awards | Accessibility | Privacy and Disclaimer Statement | Site Map

Home Programs Mental Health Topics Newsroom Publications Resources

Cómo ayudar a los niños, National Mental Health Information Center http://web.archive.org/web/20080512003241/http://mentalhealth....

1 of 1 10/02/12 11:18 AM
§ 88.3 Standards for conveyances. ( a ) The animal cargo space of conveyances used for the commercial transportation of equines for slaughter must: ( 1 ) Be designed, constructed, and maintained in a manner that at all times protects the health and well-being of the equines being transported (e.g., provides adequate ventilation, contains no sharp protrusions, etc.);
( 2 ) Include means of completely segregating each stallion and each aggressive equine on the conveyance so that no stallion or aggressive equine can come into contact with any of the other equines on the conveyance;
( 3 ) Have sufficient interior height to allow each equine on the conveyance to stand with its head extended to the fullest normal postural height; and
( 4 ) Be equipped with doors and ramps of sufficient size and location to provide for safe loading and unloading.
( b ) Equines for slaughter must not be transported in any conveyance that has the animal cargo space divided into two or more stacked levels, except that conveyances lacking the capability to convert from two or more stacked levels to one level may be used until December 7, 2006. Conveyances with collapsible floors (also known as “floating decks”) must be configured to transport equines on one level only.
[66 FR 63615, Dec. 7, 2001, as amended at 76 FR 55216, Sept. 7, 2011]
EXHIBIT 99.1


To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
of Winners Entertainment, Inc.

We have audited the consolidated  financial statements of Winners Entertainment,
Inc.  and  subsidiaries  as of December  31, 1995 and 1994,  and for each of the
three years in the period ended  December  31, 1995,  and have issued our report
thereon dated April 5, 1996; such consolidated  report is included  elsewhere in
this Registration Statement. Our audits also included the consolidated financial
statement  schedule  of  Winners  Entertainment,  Inc.  and  subsidiaries.  This
consolidated  financial  statement  schedule is the  responsibility of Company's
management.  Our  responsibility  is to express an opinion on this  consolidated
financial statement schedule based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial
statement  schedule,  when  considered  in  relation  to the basic  consolidated
financial statements taken as a whole,  presents fairly in all material respects
the information set forth therein.
   

                                                               /S/CORBIN & WERTZ
                                                                  Corbin & Wertz


Irvine, California
April 5, 1996
    


<PAGE>


   
SCHEDULE II -- VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNT
    

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>




                                             Balance At           Additions         Deductions         Balance at
                                             Beginning of                                              End of
                                             Period                                                    Period
                                             ------                                                    ------

Year ended, December 31, 1995 (1):

<S>                                          <C>                  <C>               <C>     <C>        <C>       
Provision for doubtful notes                 $       --           $  290,000        $     --(1)        $  290,000
receivable

 Allowance for deferred tax                  $6,868,000           $1,592,000        $       --         $8,460,000
 assets                                      ----------           ----------                --         ----------
                                       
                                                                                
                                             $6,868,000           $1,882,000        $       --         $8,750,000



Year ended, December 31, 1994(1):

Allowance for deferred tax                   $3,467,000           $3,401,000        $       --         $6,868,000
assets                                                            


Year ended, December 31, 1993(1)

Allowance for deferred tax                   $1,079,000           $2,388,000        $       --         $3,467,000
assets                                                                                                 


</TABLE>


   
1)   During each of the years reported,  allowances for trade  receivables  were
     not significant.
### §1015. "State" defined

As used in this chapter, the term "State" includes the several States, Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Guam, and the District of Columbia.

(Mar. 9, 1945, ch. 20, §5, 59 Stat. 34; Aug. 1, 1956, ch. 852, §4, 70 Stat. 908.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1956—Act Aug. 1, 1956, included "Guam" in definition of State.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Admission of Alaska and Hawaii to Statehood

Alaska was admitted into the Union on Jan. 3, 1959, on issuance of Proc. No. 3269, Jan. 3, 1959, 24 F.R. 81, 73 Stat. c16, and Hawaii was admitted into the Union on Aug. 21, 1959, on issuance of Proc. No. 3309, Aug. 21, 1959, 24 F.R. 6868, 73 Stat. c74. For Alaska Statehood Law, see Pub. L. 85–508, July 7, 1958, 72 Stat. 339, set out as a note preceding section 21 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions. For Hawaii Statehood Law, see Pub. L. 86–3, Mar. 18, 1959, 73 Stat. 4, set out as a note preceding section 491 of Title 48.
# C_2010288EN.01005202.xml

| 23.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/52

---

Action brought on 16 August 2010 — Panzeri v OHIM — Royal Trophy (Royal veste e premia lo sport)

(Case T-348/10)

()

(2010/C 288/97)

Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Luigi Panzeri (Monguzzi, Italy) (represented by: C. Galli, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Royal Trophy Srl (Cava di Tirreni, Italy)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of 20 May 2010 and the decision of the Opposition Division of 30 June 2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of 20 May 2010 and the decision of the Opposition Division of 30 June 2009;

| — | declare that the applicant’s opposition to the application for registration of mark No 5 285 507 is upheld and reject the application for that mark in respect of goods in Class 25 (Clothing) and Class 28 (gymnastic and sporting articles not included in other classes) and/or adopt such other measure as the Court may deem appropriate; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that the applicant’s opposition to the application for registration of mark No 5 285 507 is upheld and reject the application for that mark in respect of goods in Class 25 (Clothing) and Class 28 (gymnastic and sporting articles not included in other classes) and/or adopt such other measure as the Court may deem appropriate;

| — | order Royal Trophy Srl to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Royal Trophy Srl to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Royal Trophy Srl

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark ‘Royal veste e premia lo sport’ (Registration application No 5 285 507) for goods in Classes 25 and 28

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community word mark (No 1533504) and international word mark (No 5769068) ‘VESTE LO SPORT’ for goods in Class 25, and figurative mark ‘PANZERI veste lo sport’, not registered but used in the course of trade, for ‘clothing and, in particular, sportswear’

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Pleas in law: Misapplication of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 on the Community trade mark

---
Order entered May 1, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00092-CR

SYED SARTAJ NAWAZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 199-81120-2017

ORDER

The record is due May 10, 2019. Before the Court is court reporter Janet Dugger’s April 

29, 2019 request for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record. We GRANT the request 

to the extent we ORDER the reporter’s record due THIRTY DAYS from the date of this order. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c).

/s/ CORY L. CARLYLE 

JUSTICE
#### Stearns and others, appellants, and The Morris Canal and Banking Company, respondent.

*Mr. R. S. Green*and *Mr. C. Parker,*for appellants.

*Mr. E. W. Runyon*and *Mr. Williamson,*for respondent.

The Chief Justice.

The facts out of which this controversy has arisen are fully stated in the opinion sent up with the case. 8 *C. E. Green*414. It is not my purpose either to restate or discuss them.

The object of the bill is to set aside a certain conveyance, so as to let in upon the land a judgment held by the respondent, the ground being that the conveyance was made in fraud of creditors. The Chancellor, as I understand his views, granted the relief sought, from the conviction that the fraud imputed existed. This result was arrived at, not only from the fact that a full consideration was not paid for the land in question, but from that circumstance in connection with the other facts presented in the evidence. In this view I entirely concur, and shall vote to affirm the decree, with costs.

The whole court concurred.