alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.91
[Radian Letterhead]






February _, 2016


[name]
[address]
[address]


Re:  Restricted Stock Unit Award 


Dear [name],


As you know, Radian Group Inc. (the “Company”) granted you Restricted Stock Units on May 13, 2009 and May 12, 2010 (the “RSUs”) pursuant to the terms of the Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Unit Grant Letters dated May 13, 2009 and May 12, 2010 (the “Grant Letters”).  Under the terms of the Grant Letters, the RSUs are paid in the form of cash upon your separation from service as a member of the Board of Directors of the Company.  The Company has decided to change the form of payment, so that the RSUs will be paid in the form of whole shares of common stock of the Company upon your separation from service.  Any fractional shares will be paid in cash.  
In order to set forth the new terms of the Grant Letters, the Grant Letters are hereby amended as follows:
		
	1.
	The second paragraph of Section 5 of each Grant Letter is amended to read as follows:


“Each Restricted Stock Unit credited to the Grantee’s account shall be settled in whole shares of Common Stock equal to the number of vested Restricted Stock Units, with fractional shares paid in cash, as of the RSU Conversion Date.  The Company shall distribute such whole shares of Common Stock, and cash with respect to fractional shares, to the Grantee within 15 days after the RSU Conversion Date.  All obligations of the Company hereunder shall be subject to the rights of the Company as set forth in the Plan and to all applicable laws, rules, regulations and such approvals by governmental agencies as may be deemed appropriate by the Committee, including as set forth in Section 13 below.”     
Except as expressly modified herein, all terms and conditions of the Grant Letters shall remain in full force and effect, and all defined terms used herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Grant Letters unless otherwise defined in this letter.
Please indicate your acceptance of the amendment to the Grant Letters by signing this letter below and returning it to ________ at _________.  If you have any questions, please contact ________.
Very truly yours,


Radian Group Inc. 






By:    _______________________________________
Name:
Title:


CONFIRMED AND AGREED




____________________________                ____________________________
Name:                            Date
**Exhibit32.1**

**Certification of Principal Executive OfficerRequired by Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b)of theExchange Act**

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofAdvanstar Communications Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the three monthsended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph Loggia, Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

(2) The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand result of operations of the Company.
| By:    | /s/ Joseph  Loggia      |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Joseph Loggia           |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                    |
|   | Date: May 8, 2007       |

 

----
§ 96.1 Definitions. *Administrator.* The Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspector Service, or any person authorized to act for the Administrator.
*Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.* The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service of the United States Department of Agriculture (APHIS or Service).
*Animal casings.* Intestines, stomachs, esophagi, and urinary bladders from cattle, sheep, swine, or goats that are used to encase processed meats in foods such as sausage.
*APHIS representative.* An individual employed by APHIS who is authorized to perform the function involved.
*Authorized inspector.* Any individual authorized by the Administrator of APHIS or the Commissioner of Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security, to enforce the regulations in this subpart.
*Department.* The United States Department of Agriculture.
*Food and Drug Administration.* The Food and Drug Administration of the United States Department of Health and Human Services.
*Food Safety and Inspection Service.* The Food Safety and Inspection Service of the United States Department of Agriculture.
*Import (imported, importation) into the United States.* To bring into the territorial limits of the United States.
*Region.* Any defined geographic land area identifiable by geological, political, or surveyed boundaries. A region may consist of any of the following: ( 1 ) A national entity (country);
( 2 ) Part of a national entity (zone, county, department, municipality, parish, Province, State, etc.)
( 3 ) Parts of several national entities combined into an area; or
( 4 ) A group of national entities (countries) combined into a single area.
*United States.* All of the States of the United States, the District of Columbia, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands of the United States, American Samoa, and the territories and possessions of the United States.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0015) [57 FR 28082, June 24, 1992, as amended at 57 FR 29785, July 7, 1992; 59 FR 67134, Dec. 29, 1994; 62 FR 56024, Oct. 28, 1997; 70 FR 553, Jan. 4, 2005; 72 FR 53379, Sept. 18, 2007]
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Ernest Faulkner, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 55657;

First District

September 28, 1971.

Gerald W. Getty, Public Defender, of Chicago, for appellant.

Edward V. Hanrahan, State’s Attorney, of Chicago, for the People.

Mr. JUSTICE STAMOS

delivered the opinion of the court:

On August 9, 1968, defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of armed robbery and was placed on probation for three years. On August 25, 1970, he was convicted of the unlawful use of a weapon and again admitted to probation with the condition that he serve the first 120 days in the House of Correction.

A probation violation hearing was conducted on October 15, 1970 and his probation granted on August 9, 1968 was revoked and he was *658sentenced to not less than two nor more than six years in the Illinois State Penitentiary.

On October 15, 1970, defendant filed a notice of appeal and the Public Defender was appointed counsel. A motion to allow the Public Defender to withdraw from the case has been filed. He states that the only basis of appeal would be whether the probation violation was proven when it was stipulated at the probation violation hearing that defendant was convicted of the unlawful use of a weapon. In accordance with *Anders v. California*(1967), 386 U.S. 738 the Public Defender has submitted to this court a brief and the transcript of proceedings. The record shows that at the proceedings to revoke probation it was stipulated that defendant on August 25, 1970 had been convicted of the crime of unlawful use of a weapon.

Defendant did not file any pleadings in response to the notice of the Public Defender or of the court. Defendant did write this court and urged that his convictions for armed robbery and unlawful use of weapon were improper. However, no appeals were taken from these convictions. The record before us establishes that the probation was properly revoked and we sustain the position of the Public Defender. The motion for leave to withdraw is therefore allowed and the judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

LEIGHTON, P. J., and SCHWARTZ, J., concur.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Cambridge Heart, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31,2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Vincenzo LiCausi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. 

Dated: March 31, 2010
Exhibit 10.11.7

December 5, 2001


Mr. Peter W. Johnson
P.O. Box 1023
Chadds Ford, PA  19317

Dear Pete:

We are pleased to extend the following offer to you with Foamex International,
Inc.

     1.   Position: President and Chief Operating Officer pending approval by
          the Board of Directors on December 6, 2001.

     2.   Base Salary: $375,000 annually, paid on a bi-weekly basis.

     3.   Incentive Programs: You will participate in the following programs:

          (a)  Foamex Management Incentive Program - You will be eligible for a
               target bonus award equivalent to 75% of base salary.

          (b)  Foamex Long Term Incentive Plan - You will receive 150,000 Foamex
               Stock Options in accordance with the Foamex Stock Option Plan.
               The strike price of the 100,000 options is equal to the closing
               price of the first full day of employment.

     4.   Sign-on Bonus: Excutive shall be paid $200,000 bonus by the Company in
          consideration for Executive's commencement of services under this
          Agreement ("Signing Bonus") subject to withholdings and other normal
          employee deductions as may be required by law. The Signing Bonus shall
          be paid in three equal installments of $66,667 on February 28, April
          30 and June 30, 2002.

     5.   Vacation: You are eligible for four (4) weeks vacation.

     6.   Other Benefits: To the extent such plans are maintained by Foamex, you
          will participate in our employee benefits. Benefits commence on the
          first of the month following thirty days of employment. Currently,
          Foamex provides contributory medical, prescription drug, dental,
          vision and long-term disability plans. Additionally, you will be
          eligible for our Executive Split Dollar Life Insurance Program which
          provides for coverage at three (3) times annual salary during
          employment and two (2) times annual salary post-retirement.


<PAGE>


Mr. Peter W. Johnson
December 5, 2001
Page Two


     7.   Retirement Programs: Regarding retirement programs, Foamex maintains a
          defined retirement plan for salaried employees with vesting after 5
          years. You will also be eligible for 401(k) participation subject to
          the terms of the plan. As discussed, Foamex matches at the rate of 25%
          up to 4% of your pay. We also match contributions into the Foamex
          stock feature of the 401(k) plan at the rate of 50%, up to the same 4%
          limit.

     8.   Termination: If the Company should terminate you for a reason, other
          than for cause, you shall receive a severance payment equal to
          twenty-four months of base salary.


Our offer is contingent upon successfully completing a reference and background
check and our post-offer physical examination.

Kindly respond to this offer as soon as possible. We will follow up with a more
detailed employment agreement upon Board approval.

Sincerely,

/s/ James T. Van Horn

James T. Van Horn
Seniror Vice President
Human Resources

JT/vh



Agreed and accepted to: /s/ Peter W. Johnson
Support Documents for 

Significant New Use Rule (SNUR) on 

Premanufacture Notice (PMN) 

P-10-56 

EPA Docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2011-0577 

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 43
Index

A-001 Structure Activity Team (SAT) Report for 

PMN P-10-56 

A-002 Initial Review Engineering Report for 

PMN P-10-56 

A-003 Initial Review Exposure Report for 

PMN P-10-56 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 43
A-001 

Structure Activity Team (SAT) Report

for PMN P-10-56 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 43
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 43
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 43
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 43
EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 43
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 43
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 9 of 43
A-002 

Initial Review Engineering Report

for PMN P-10-56 

EPA SANITIZED Page 10 of 43
 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 11 of 43
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 12 of 43
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 13 of 43
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 14 of 43
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 15 of 43
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 16 of 43
EPA SANITIZED Page 17 of 43
 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 18 of 43
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 19 of 43
EPA SANITIZED Page 20 of 43
A-003 

Initial Review Exposure Report

for PMN P-10-56 

EPA SANITIZED Page 21 of 43
EPA SANITIZED Page 22 of 43
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 23 of 43
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 24 of 43
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 25 of 43
 

 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 26 of 43
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 27 of 43
EPA SANITIZED Page 28 of 43
EPA SANITIZED Page 29 of 43
EPA SANITIZED Page 30 of 43
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 31 of 43
EPA SANITIZED Page 32 of 43
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 33 of 43
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 34 of 43
EPA SANITIZED Page 35 of 43
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 36 of 43
EPA SANITIZED Page 37 of 43
EPA SANITIZED Page 38 of 43
EPA SANITIZED Page 39 of 43
EPA SANITIZED Page 40 of 43
EPA SANITIZED Page 41 of 43
EPA SANITIZED Page 42 of 43
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 43 of 43
#### § 93.518 Swine from Canada for immediate slaughter.

Swine imported from Canada for immediate slaughter shall be consigned from the port of entry directly to a recognized slaughtering establishment and there be slaughtered within two weeks from the date of entry. As used in this section, “directly” means without unloading en route if moved in a means of conveyance, or without stopping if moved in any other manner.

[55 FR 31495, Aug. 2, 1990, as amended at 59 FR 28216, June 1, 1994. Redesignated at 62 FR 56012, Oct. 28, 1997]
Editorial Note on Subpart A of Part 82
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart A of part 82 appear at 78 FR 19083, Mar. 29, 2013.

§ 82.9 Interstate movement of hatching eggs from a quarantined area. Hatching eggs from birds or poultry not known to be infected with or exposed to Newcastle disease may be moved interstate from a quarantined area only if: ( a ) The hatching eggs are accompanied by a permit obtained in accordance with § 82.11;
( b ) Copies of the permit accompanying the hatching eggs are submitted so that a copy is received by both the State animal health official and the veterinarian in charge for the State of destination within 72 hours of the arrival of the hatching eggs at the premises described in paragraph (c) of this section;
( c ) The hatching eggs have been kept in accordance with the sanitation practices specified in §§ 147.22 and 147.25 of the National Poultry Improvement Plan; and
( d ) The hatching eggs are held in the State of destination at a premises designated jointly by the veterinarian in charge and the State animal health official from the time of arrival until hatch and the birds and poultry hatched from the eggs are held at the designated premises for not less than 30 days following hatch. During this holding period, the eggs and any birds or poultry hatched from the eggs are subject to any inspections, disinfections, and tests as may be required by the Administrator to determine their freedom from Newcastle disease.
[61 FR 56883, Nov. 5, 1996, as amended at 73 FR 30299, May 27, 2008]
§ 22.14 Production of Documents, Electronically Stored Information, Other Tangible Things, or Entry Onto Land [Rule 14]. ( a ) *When documents, electronically stored information, other tangible things, or entry onto land may be requested.* After an appeal has been docketed by the Board and a complaint has been filed, any party may serve on any other party a request— ( 1 ) To produce and permit the inspection, copying, or photographing of any designated documents or electronically stored information (including writings, papers, books, accounts, photographs, drawings, graphs, charts, recordings, and other data or data compilations), or other tangible things, not privileged, which are in his, her, or its possession, custody, or control and which are within the scope of discovery as described in § 22.8(b) of this part [Rule 8(b)]; or
( 2 ) To permit entry onto designated land or other property in his or its possession or control for the purpose of inspecting, measuring, surveying, filming, or photographing the property or any designated object or operation thereon which is within the scope of discovery as described in § 22.8(b) of this part [Rule 8(b)].
( b ) *Time, place, and manner.* The request shall specify the time, place, and manner of making the inspection and taking the copies and photographs. The Board may make an order that the inspection, copying, measuring, surveying, filming, or photographing shall be limited to certain matters; or the Board may make any other order which, in its discretion, it deems appropriate to protect the party from annoyance, burden, or harassment.
#### § 11.5 Administrative wage garnishment.

DHS may collect debts from a debtor's wages by means of administrative wage garnishment in accordance with the requirements of 31 U.S.C. 3720D under the procedures established in 31 CFR 285.11.
#### § 381.25 Official establishment numbers.

An official establishment number shall be assigned to each establishment granted inspection service. Such number shall be used to identify all containers of inspected poultry products prepared in the establishment. An establishment shall not have more than one establishment number.
### [§9651. Repealed. Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title V, §552(b), Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 1741]

Section, Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 581; Pub. L. 99–145, title XIII, §1301(d)(3), Nov. 8, 1985, 99 Stat. 736, related to issuance of arms, tentage, and equipment to educational institutions not maintaining units of the Air Force Reserve Officers' Training Corps.
§ 22.13 Requests for Admission [Rule 13]. ( a ) *When requests for admission may be served.* ( 1 ) After an appeal has been docketed by the Board and a complaint has been filed, a party may serve on the opposing party a written request for the admission by the latter of the genuineness of any relevant documents described in and exhibited with the request, or of the truth of any relevant matters of fact set forth in the request. Each of the matters for which an admission is requested shall be deemed admitted unless, within the period designated in § 22.8(c) and § 22.8(f) of this part [Rules 8(e) and 8(f)] for responding to discovery requests, the party to whom the request is directed serves upon the party requesting the admission either: ( i ) A sworn statement denying specifically the matters for which an admission is requested or setting forth in detail the reasons why he or she cannot truthfully admit or deny those matters, or
( ii ) Written objections on the ground that some or all of the requested admissions are privileged or irrelevant or that the request is otherwise improper in whole or in part.
( 2 ) If written objections to a part of the request are made, the remainder of the request shall be answered within the period designated in Rule 8(f). A denial shall fairly meet the substance of the requested admission and, when good faith requires that a party deny only a part of a matter for which an admission is requested, he or she shall specify so much of it as is true and deny only the remainder.
( b ) *Limits.* The number of requests for admissions served shall not be limited except as the Board may require to protect a party from annoyance, burden, or harassment.
( c ) *Use as evidence.* Any matter admitted is conclusively established for the purpose of the pending action, unless the Board, on motion, permits withdrawal or amendment of the admission.
[73 FR 36258, June 26, 2008, as amended at 73 FR 60610, Oct. 14, 2008]
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

The Boardof Directors 

Orthovita, Inc.: 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos. 333-66681, 333-90981, 333-100034, 333-107282, 333-118219, 333-131667, 333-145723, 333-151977 and 333-161313) on Form S-8 and in the Registration Statements (Nos.333-47386, 333-59288, 333-84632, 333-88334, 333-100341, 333-107210, 333-111697, 333-118216, 333-131668, 333-145724 and 333-141403) on Form S-3 of Orthovita, Inc. and subsidiaries of our reports dated March 16, 2010, with respect to theconsolidated balance sheets of Orthovita, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and comprehensive loss and cash flows for each of the years inthe three-year period ended December 31, 2009, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, which reports appear in the December 31, 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Orthovita, Inc.

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

March 16, 2010
1 The HONORABLE ROBERT W. PRATT, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 02-1011

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Southern District of Iowa. Jorge Alfredo Pina-Arellano, also * known as Jorge Alberto Lopez, also * [UNPUBLISHED] known as Jose Lopez-Gonzalez, * * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: April 24, 2002 Filed: April 26, 2002

___________ Before LOKEN, BEAM, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Jorge Pina-Arellano appeals the sentence imposed by the district court 1 after he pleaded guilty to illegal reentry following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). Specifically, Pina contends he was entitled to a downward departure because--as an alien subject to removal--he is subject to a longer and harsher period of incarceration.-2- As he concedes, this court rejected his argument in United States v. Cardosa-Rodriguez , 241 F.3d 613, 614 (8th Cir. 2001) (deportable aliens’ ineligibility for Bureau of Prisons benefits does not provide basis for downward departure in illegal-reentry cases), and only this court en banc may overrule that decision, see Campbell v. Purkett , 957 F.2d 535, 536 (8th Cir. 1992) (per curiam). Accordingly, we affirm. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 32

Certification

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned hereby certifies that:

(1) I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Inland Monthly Income Fund II, L.P. (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;

(2) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(3) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Inland Monthly Income Fund II, L.P.

 

 

By: Inland Real Estate Investment Corporation      General Partner

 

/S/ Brenda G. Gujral_________________________________

Name: Brenda G. GujralTitle: President of the General Partner and        Principal Executive Officer of Inland Monthly Income Fund II, L.P

Date: August 11, 2003
TS-ASLT10/20/30

Attachment #6

Pt. 2, Sec. A, 3

Environmental Release and Disposal Info rmation on the New Chemical Substance

at Industrial Sites Controlled by the Submitter – Manufacture and Processing