alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk June 25, 2012

h0618 

# Order

June 25, 2012

144126 & (20)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 144126

COA: 305286

Oceana CC: 87

- 001507

- FC

MICHAEL ANTHONY GRABINSKI,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 6, 2011

order of the Court of App eals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s

motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G). The motion for

personal protection order and permanent restraining order is DENIED.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-31143 Summary Calendar

__________________ JUVENTINO MUNOZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus KEITH SIMONE ET AL., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. CA-95-2559-L
- - - - - - - - - - * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

___________________ No. 95-31304 Summary Calendar

__________________ JUVENTINO MUNOZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus GLEN JAMBON, Major, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 94-CV-4192-J
- - - - - - - - - - May 16, 1996Nos. 95-31143 & 95-31304 -2-

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. Before GARWOOD, WIENER, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Juventino Munoz appeals the dismissal of two civil rights complaints. In the first, Munoz argues that the district court erred by dismissing his use-of-force and denial-of-medical-care claims as time-barred. See Munoz v. Simone , No. CA-95-2559-L (E.D. La.; Oct. 30, 1995). We have reviewed the record and Munoz's brief and AFFIRM the district court's dismissal of the claims for the same reasons set forth by the district court. Id. In the second, Munoz argues in general terms that the district court abused its discretion by dismissing as frivolous his complaint wherein he alleged that his legal mail was opened outside of his presence. As the district court's dismissal was for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, Munoz's arguments on appeal are unavailing and we AFFIRM the dismissal for the same reasons set forth by the district court. See Munoz v. Jambon , No. 94-CV-4192-J (E.D. La.; Feb. 10, 1995).

No. 95-31143 AFFIRMED. No. 95-31304 AFFIRMED.
#### § 381.79 Passing of carcasses and parts.

Each carcass and all organs and other parts of carcasses which are found to be not adulterated shall be passed for human food.
#### § 9032.5 Matching payment account.

*Matching payment account* means the Presidential Primary Matching Payment Account established by the Secretary of the Treasury under 26 U.S.C. 9037(a).
FORM RD 2006-46 (Rev. 01-98)

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE MANUAL ISSUE No.

RURAL DEVELOPMENT WSAL PN 605

Washington, D.C 20250 DATE

January 29, 2024 

PROCEDURE NOTICE

RD MANUAL CHANGES

INSERT RD INS 440.1 INTEREST RATES, AMORTIZATION, 

(WSAL) GUARANTEE FEE, ANNUAL CHARGE, AND 

FIXED PERIOD. This Instruction is 

partially revised as follows:

Exhibit B is partially revised to update the Treasury Judgement rate and the 

effective date of February 1, 2024.

INSERT

Exhibit B revised 1-29-24. 

INSERT RD INS 2042-A CLAIMS UNDER FEDERAL TORT CLAIMS ACT.

(WSAL) This Instruction is completely revised as 

follows:

Significant technical updates to reflect current policies and procedures of 

Federal Tort Claims administration. These updates include new, revised, removal 

of obsolete language, and links to statutory authorities. Also, to align with 

current Federal authorities, USDA regulations, and the current RD organizational 

structure. 

Established the roles, responsibilities, and designations of Agency Tort Contact 

and State Office Tort Contact, and responsible offices to handle and execute 

claims within established thresholds. 

Created new sections in the Instruction, including Agency Claim Report, 

delegations of authorities, definitions, and citations to assist the novice with 

how to properly handle a tort claim.

RURAL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT GRANTS. This

(WSAL) Instruction is being revised due to the 

 publication of the Final Rule entitled 

“Rural Business Development Grant (RBDG) Regulation: Tribes and Tribal 

Business References To Provide Equitable Access” dated December 14, 2023, with 

an effective date of January 16, 2024. 

INSERT RD INS 4280-E

oOo

READ PROCEDURE - DISCUSS IN STAFF CONFERENCE - KEEP PROCEDURE MANUAL UP TO DATE
Dismiss and Opinion Filed March 18, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-20-00823-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF R.M., R.M., AND R.M., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 469th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 469-54067-2018

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Myers, Osborne, and Carlyle

Opinion by Justice Osborne

Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue. By order dated January 14, 2021, we 

granted appellant’s request to extend time to file his brief and ordered it filed no later 

than February 16, 2021. By postcard dated February 23, 2021, we notified appellant 

the time for filing his brief had expired. We directed appellant to file a brief and an 

extension motion within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to file his 

brief by that time might result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. 

To date, appellant has not filed a brief, filed a further extension motion, nor 

otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal.
–2–

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b), 

(c).

200823F.P05

/Leslie Osborne/

LESLIE OSBORNE

JUSTICE
–3–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

IN THE INTEREST OF R.M., R.M., 

AND R.M., CHILDREN

No. 05-20-00823-CV

On Appeal from the 469th Judicial 

District Court, Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 469-54067-

2018.

Opinion delivered by Justice 

Osborne. Justices Myers and Carlyle 

participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is 

DISMISSED.

Judgment entered this 18th day of March, 2021.
### §2902. Surveys of Coast Guard families

(a) Authority.—The Commandant, in order to determine the effectiveness of Federal policies, programs, and activities related to the families of Coast Guard members, may survey—

(1) any Coast Guard member;

(2) any retired Coast Guard member;

(3) the immediate family of any Coast Guard member or retired Coast Guard member; and

(4) any survivor of a deceased Coast Guard member.

(b) Voluntary Participation.—Participation in any survey conducted under subsection (a) shall be voluntary.

(c) Federal Recordkeeping.—Each individual surveyed under subsection (a) shall be considered an employee of the United States for purposes of section 3502(3)(A)(i) of title 44.

(Added Pub. L. 113–281, title II, §214(a), Dec. 18, 2014, 128 Stat. 3029, §532; renumbered §2902, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §117(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4230; amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. G, title LVXXXV [LXXXV], §8505(a)(47), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4750.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2902 was renumbered section 5102 of this title.

#### Amendments

2021—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 116–283 substituted "individual" for "person".

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 532 of this title as this section.
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N NO. 03-13-00553- CV Ross Brooks, App ellant

v. Lili ana Reyes, Appellee F ROM TH E CO UNTY COURT AT LAW NO . 1 O F TRAVIS CO UNTY NO. C-1 -CV- 11- 0128 79, H ONO RAB LE J. DAVID P HI LLIP S, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss the appea l, explaining that they have resolved the ir dispute. We gr ant the motion and dismiss t he appe al. SeeTex. R. App. P . 42.1(a) .

__________________________________________ David Puryear , J ustice Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Rose and Gooodwin Dismissed on J oint Moti on Filed: De cembe r 3, 2013
### §162. Creation of China corporations restricted

No corporation for the purpose of engaging in business within China shall be created under any law of the United States other than this chapter.

(Sept. 19, 1922, ch. 346, §29, as added Feb. 26, 1925, ch. 345, §13, 43 Stat. 997.)
### §276. Ownership of facilities

In the absence of specific agreement to the contrary, additional facilities, including equipment, purchased pursuant to the performance of services authorized by section 273 of this title shall become the property of the Department of Commerce.

(Mar. 3, 1901, ch. 872, §8, 31 Stat. 1450; June 30, 1932, ch. 314, pt. II, title III, §312, 47 Stat. 410; Aug. 3, 1956, ch. 906, §1, 70 Stat. 959.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1956—Act Aug. 3, 1956, substituted provisions relating to ownership of additional facilities by the Department of Commerce (formerly contained in section 278b of this title) for those relating to fees, see section 275a of this title.

1932—Act June 30, 1932, inserted provision for payment of moneys into the Treasury, among other changes.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1932 Amendment

Amendment by act June 30, 1932, effective July 1, 1932, see section 314 of that act.
#### § 93.806 Animals refused entry.

Any elephant, hippopotamus, rhinoceros, or tapir refused entry into the United States for noncompliance with the requirements of this part shall be removed from the United States within a time period specified by the Administrator or shall be considered abandoned by the importer, and pending removal or abandonment, the animal shall be subject to such safeguards as the inspector determines necessary to prevent the possible introduction of ectoparasites into the United States. If such animal is not removed from the United States within such time period or is abandoned, it may be seized, destroyed, or otherwise disposed of as the Administrator determines necessary to prevent the possible introduction of ectoparasites into the United States.

[52 FR 29502, Aug. 10, 1987, as amended at 57 FR 23049, June 1, 1992. Redesignated at 62 FR 56012, Oct. 28, 1997]
# C_2013260EN.01000301.xml

| 7.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 July 2013 — Union des associations européennes de football (UEFA) v European Commission, Kingdom of Belgium, and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

(Case C-201/11 P) (1)

1

(Appeals - Television broadcasting - Directive 89/552/EEC - Article 3a - Measures taken by the United Kingdom concerning events of major importance for the society of that Member State - European Football Championship - Decision declaring the measures compatible with European Union law - Statement of reasons - Articles 49 EC and 86 EC - Right to property)

2013/C 260/03

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Union des associations européennes de football (UEFA) (represented by: D. Anderson QC, and D. Piccinin, Barrister, instructed by B. Keane and T. McQuail, Solicitors)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: E. Montaguti, N. Yerrell and A. Dawes, acting as Agents, and M. Gray, Barrister), Kingdom of Belgium, and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, (represented by: L. Seeboruth and J. Beeko, acting as Agents, and T. de la Mare, Barrister)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 17 February 2011 in Case T-55/08 UEFA v Commission dismissing an action for annulment of Commission Decision 2007/730/EC of 16 October 2007 declaring compatible with Community law measures taken by the United Kingdom pursuant to Article 3a(1) of Council Directive 89/552/EEC of 3 October 1989 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities (OJ 2007 L 295, p. 12)

UEFA

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders the Union des associations européennes de football (UEFA) to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Union des associations européennes de football (UEFA) to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 204, 9.7.2011.

1

---
**Exhibit 32.1****Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350****As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002**     In connection with the Annual Report of National DentexCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for theyear ending December 31, 2004 filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, David L. Brown, President, ChiefExecutive Officer, and Director of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that to my knowledge:          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    result of operations of the Company.     By: /s/ David L. Brown       David L. Brown     President, Chief Executive Officer and DirectorMay 24, 2005
### §2088. Financial responsibility

#### (a) Identification and determination of bond

The Commission, in consultation with U.S. Customs and Border Protection and other relevant Federal agencies, shall identify any consumer product, or other product or substance that is regulated under this chapter or any other Act enforced by the Commission, for which the cost of destruction would normally exceed bond amounts determined under sections 1623 and 1624 of title 19 and shall recommend to U.S. Customs and Border Protection a bond amount sufficient to cover the cost of destruction of such products or substances.

#### (b) Study of requiring escrow for recalls and destruction of products

#### (1) Study

The Comptroller General shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of requiring—

(A) the posting of an escrow, proof of insurance, or security sufficient in amount to cover the cost of destruction of a domestically-produced product or substance regulated under this chapter or any other Act enforced by the Commission; and

(B) the posting of an escrow, proof of insurance, or security sufficient in amount to cover the cost of an effective recall of a product or substance, domestic or imported, regulated under this chapter or any other Act enforced by the Commission.

#### (2) Report

Not later than 180 days after August 14, 2008, the Comptroller General shall transmit to the appropriate Congressional committees a report on the conclusions of the study required under paragraph (1), including an assessment of whether such an escrow requirement could be implemented and any recommendations for such implementation.

(Pub. L. 92–573, §41, as added Pub. L. 110–314, title II, §224(a), Aug. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 3069.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> CT
<CIK> 0000835095
<NAME> BOSTON CAPITAL TAX CREDIT FUND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,024,079
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,024,079
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,458
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,642,873)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,639,415)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
September 1, 2004 Page 1 of 1 

Protect Yourself from Carbon Monoxide Poisoning After an 

Emergency 

Never use generators, grills, camp stoves, or other gasoline, 

propane, natural gas, or charcoal-burning devices inside your home, 

basement, garage, or camper—or even outside near an open 

window.

Carbon monoxide (CO) is an odorless, colorless gas that can cause sudden illness and death if 

you breathe it. When power outages occur during emergencies such as hurricanes or winter storms, you 

may try to use alternative sources of fuel or electricity for heating, cooling, or cooking. CO from these 

sources can build up in your home, garage, or camper and poison the people and animals inside. 

If you are too hot or too cold, or you need to prepare food, don't put yourself and your family at 

risk—look to friends or a community shelter for help. If you must use an alternative source of 

fuel or electricity, be sure to use it only outside and away from open windows. 

Every year, more than 500 people die from accidental CO poisoning. CO is found in combustion 

fumes, such as those produced by small gasoline engines, stoves, generators, lanterns, and gas ranges, or 

by burning charcoal and wood. CO from these sources can build up in enclosed or partially enclosed 

spaces. 

People and animals in these spaces can be poisoned and can die from breathing CO in an enclosed or 

partially enclosed space. 

How to Recognize CO Poisoning 

Exposure to CO can cause loss of consciousness and death. The most common symptoms of CO 

poisoning are headache, dizziness, weakness, nausea, vomiting, chest pain, and confusion. People who 

are sleeping or who have been drinking alcohol can die from CO poisoning before ever having symptoms. 

If you think you may have CO poisoning, consult a health care professional right away. 

Important Tips 

• Never use a gas range or oven to heat a home. 

• Never use a charcoal grill, hibachi, lantern, or portable camping stove inside a home, tent, or 

camper. 

• Never run a generator, pressure washer, or any gasoline-powered engine inside a basement, 

garage, or other enclosed structure, even if the doors or windows are open, unless the equipment 

is professionally installed and vented. Keep vents and flues free of debris, especially if winds are 

high. Flying debris can block ventilation lines. 

• Never run a motor vehicle, generator, pressure washer, or any gasoline-powered engine outside an 

open window or door where exhaust can vent into an enclosed area. 

• Never leave the motor running in a vehicle parked in an enclosed or partially enclosed space, such 

as a closed garage. 

For more information, visit www.bt.cdc.gov, or call the CDC public response hotline 

at (888) 246-2675 (English), (888) 246-2857 (español), or (866) 874-2646 (TTY).
#### § 93.507 Inspection at the port of entry.

Inspection shall be made at the port of entry of all swine imported from any part of the world except as provided in § 93.519. All swine found to be free from communicable disease and not to have been exposed thereto within 60 days prior to their exportation to the United States shall be admitted subject to the other provisions in this part; all other swine shall be refused entry. Swine refused entry, unless exported within a time fixed in each case by the Administrator, and in accordance with other provisions he or she may require in each case for their handling shall be disposed of as the Administrator may direct. Such portions of the transporting vessel, and of its cargo, which have been exposed to any such swine or their emanations shall be disinfected in such manner as may be considered necessary by the inspector in charge at the port of entry, to prevent the introduction or spread of livestock or poultry disease, before the cargo is allowed to land.

[55 FR 31495, Aug. 2, 1990. Redesignated and amended at 62 FR 56012, 56020, Oct. 28, 1997; 68 FR 6344, Feb. 7, 2003]
§ 152.28 Action at close of bidding. ( a ) The officer in charge of the sale shall publicly announce the apparent highest acceptable bid. The deposits submitted by the unsuccessful bidders shall be returned immediately. The deposit submitted by the apparent successful bidder shall be held in a special account.
( b ) If the highest bid received at an advertised sale is less than the appraised fair market value of the land, the Secretary with the consent of the owner may accept that bid if the amount bid approximates said appraised fair market value and in the Secretary's judgment is the highest price that may be realized in the circumstances.
( c ) The Secretary shall award the bid and notify the apparent successful bidder that the remainder of the purchase price must be submitted within 30 days. ( 1 ) Upon a showing of cause the Secretary may, in his discretion, extend the time of payment of the balance due.
( 2 ) If the remainder of the purchase price is not paid within the time allowed, the bid will be rejected and the apparent successful bidder's 10 percent deposit will be forfeited to the landowner's use.
( d ) The issuance of the patent or delivery of a deed to the purchaser will not be authorized until the balance of the purchase price has been paid, except that the fee patent may be ordered in cases where the purchaser is obtaining a loan from an agency of the Federal Government and such agency has given the Secretary a commitment that the balance of the purchase price will be paid when the fee patent is issued.