alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2007006EN.01000901.xml

| 11.1.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/9

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

10 January 2007

(2007/C 6/17)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2988 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 154,99 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4539 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,67020 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1198 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6138 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 94,60 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2985 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5784 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,735 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 256,72 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6980 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9038 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,4107 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 34,599 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8918 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6664 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5301 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1277 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8851 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9967 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 218,08 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,5764 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,1399 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3714 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 793,10 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5659 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,446 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,4130 |
| THB | Thai baht | 46,837 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2988

JPY

Japanese yen

154,99

DKK

Danish krone

7,4539

GBP

Pound sterling

0,67020

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1198

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6138

ISK

Iceland króna

94,60

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2985

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5784

CZK

Czech koruna

27,735

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

256,72

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6980

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9038

RON

Romanian leu

3,4107

SKK

Slovak koruna

34,599

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8918

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6664

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5301

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1277

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8851

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9967

KRW

South Korean won

1 218,08

ZAR

South African rand

9,5764

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,1399

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3714

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 793,10

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5659

PHP

Philippine peso

63,446

RUB

Russian rouble

34,4130

THB

Thai baht

46,837

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
### §278m. Repealed. Pub. L. 110–69, title III, §3013(d), Aug. 9, 2007, 121 Stat. 599

Section, act Mar. 3, 1901, ch. 872, §27, as added Pub. L. 100–418, title V, §5121(d), Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1437, related to the establishment of a program for the evaluation of non-energy inventions.
The Honor able Edmund A. Sar gus, J r., United States District Judge f or the Southern * District of Ohio, sitting by desig nation. NO T REC OM M EN DE D F OR F UL L- TEX T P UB LIC AT ION File Na me: 08a0547n.06 Filed: September

8, 2008
Case No. 07- 5940
UN ITED STA TES C OU RT OF AP P EA LS F OR THE SI XT H C IR CU IT ) NOLAN WHITAKER, ) ) P lai nt iff-A ppe lla nt , ) ON AP P EA L F RO M THE U NI TED ) STA TES D ISTRIC T C OU RT F OR THE ) WEST ERN DISTRICT OF K ENTUCKY ) AT LOU ISV ILLE v. ) ) ) ELE CTRONIC DATA SYSTEMS ) CORP ORATION, et al., ) ) Defendan t-Appellees. )
BEFORE: COLE and GRIF F IN, Circ uit Jud ges; SARG US, DistrictJudge. *

SARGU S, District Judge. The Appe llant, Nolan Whitaker (“ Whit aker ”),
a pp e a ls the summa

ry jud g me nt r e nd e re d b y

the dis tr ic t c ourt

in f avo r o f t he Ap pe lle e , E le c tr on ic Data Sy stems Corporation (“E lectronic Data” ). Whitaker conte nds that his former e mploy er, Electronic Data, r etaliated a g ainst him for asser ting his rights under the F amily Medica l L eave Act (“ FMLA”) , 29 U.S.C. § 2601, et. seq. , interfe red w ith his rights under the FMLA, and discriminated ag ainst him in vi olation of the Ke ntucky Civil Rights Act, Ky . Rev. Stat.-2-

§ 344.040. Af

te r c are fu lly

re vie wi ngthe re c or d, the a pp lic a ble law, and

thepa rt ie s’ br ie fs , we a re c onvinced that the district c ourt did not err. The opinion issued by the district court
corr ectly sets forth the law

g overningthe issues raise d in this case. The ref ore, w e AF FI RM the district court’s summary

judgme nt for the r easons se t forth in the thorough opinion of the district court.
-  Home 

# In This Section

-  PHMSA Rules 
-  Hazardous Materials Approvals and Permits 
-  Notices and Advisory Bulletins 
-  Pipeline Special Permits & State Waivers 

# 107

## Part 107: HAZARDOUS MATERIALS PROGRAM PROCEDURES

Below are the available interpretations and guidance for the given section. To return to the list of parts, use the Parts link above. If you do not see any guidance or interpretation information below, that means there is none available for the given part/section. Return to the search page to browse additional regulations sections.

PHMSA has published several Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) documents on regulatory topics. Please review our FAQ documents below:

https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/about-phmsa/phmsa-faqs.

Additionally PHMSA has Hazardous Materials FAQs based on letters of interpretation on the following topics:
                              - Applicability of the Hazardous Materials Regulations
                              - Hazardous Materials Incident Reporting
                              - Hazardous Materials Training Requirements

This section of the website provides the ability to find regulations information including regulations parts, content of sections, and interpretations for regulations sections. Below is a list of parts, identified by the part number and subject. To browse sections by part, click on the subject link below. You will be taken to the eCFR website to view sections for a part.

A written regulatory interpretation, response to a question, or an opinion concerning a pipeline safety issue may be obtained by submitting a written request to the Office of Pipeline Safety (PHP–30), PHMSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590–0001 or at the email address: pipeline_interp_submittal@dot.gov. In addition to email address, the requestor must include his or her return address and should also include a daytime telephone number. Requests should be submitted at least 120 days before the time the requestor needs a response.

Note: electronic submission is provided as alternative to the 49 CFR Part 190.11(b) mail-in requirement.

The regulations text of the section can be found on the eCFR website. To view the regulations text, use the link below. For assistance, please send an email to PHMSA.Webmaster@dot.gov.

View part 107 on the ECFR website

## Interpretation Responses

## Regulation Sections
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 505 

To ensure due process protections of individuals in the United States against 

unlawful detention based solely on a protected characteristic. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2019 

Ms. DUCKWORTH (for herself, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mr. BOOKER, Mr. DURBIN, 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Ms. HARRIS, Ms. HIRONO, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. MARKEY, Mrs. MURRAY, Ms. ROSEN, Mr. SCHATZ, Ms. SMITH, and Ms. WARREN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To ensure due process protections of individuals in the 

United States against unlawful detention based solely 

on a protected characteristic. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Korematsu-Takai Civil 

5 Liberties Protection Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST UNLAWFUL DETENTION. 

7 Section 4001 of title 18, United States Code, is 

8 amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 505 IS

1 (1) by redesignating subsection (b) as sub2 section (c); and 

3 (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the fol4 lowing: 

5 ‘‘(b) PROHIBITION ON DETENTION BASED ON PRO6 TECTED CHARACTERISTICS.— 

7 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—No individual may be im8 prisoned or otherwise detained based solely on an ac9 tual or perceived protected characteristic of the indi10 vidual. 

11 ‘‘(2) DEFINITION.—In this subsection, the term 

12 ‘protected characteristic’ includes each of the fol13 lowing: 

14 ‘‘(A) Race. 

15 ‘‘(B) Ethnicity. 

16 ‘‘(C) National origin. 

17 ‘‘(D) Religion. 

18 ‘‘(E) Sex. 

19 ‘‘(F) Gender identity. 

20 ‘‘(G) Sexual orientation. 

21 ‘‘(H) Disability. 

22 ‘‘(I) Any additional characteristic that the 

23 Attorney General determines to be a protected 

24 characteristic. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•S 505 IS

1 ‘‘(3) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in 

2 this subsection shall be construed to allow the Attor3 ney General to remove a characteristic described in 

4 subparagraphs (A) through (H) of paragraph (2) 

5 from the definition of the term ‘protected char6 acteristic’ under this subsection.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
# C_2012013EN.01001303.xml

| 14.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/13

---

Judgment of the General Court of 22 November 2011 — Sports Warehouse v OHIM (TENNIS WAREHOUSE)

(Case T-290/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark TENNIS WAREHOUSE - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Distinctive character - Obligation to state reasons - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2012/C 13/27

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Sports Warehouse GmbH (Schutterwald, Germany) (represented by: M. Douglas, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: initially S. Schäffner and subsequently R. Pethke, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 April 2010 (Case R 1259/2009-1) concerning an application for registration of the word sign TENNIS WAREHOUSE as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Sports Warehosue GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Sports Warehosue GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 234, 28.8.2010.

1

---
§ 1310.3 Assessment of administrative charge. ( a ) *Range of charges.* Except as otherwise provided herein, the responsible land manager shall assess a charge which he/she determines in his/her sole judgment to be approximately equal to the administrative costs incurred by TVA for each action including both the direct cost to TVA and applicable overheads. In determining the amount of such charge, the responsible land manager may establish a standard charge for each category of action rather than determining the actual administrative costs for each individual action. The standard charge shall be an amount approximately equal to TVA's actual average administrative costs for the category of action. Charges shall be not less than the minimum or greater than the maximum amount specified herein, except as otherwise provided in paragraph (c) of this section. ( 1 ) Land transfers—$500-$10,000.
( 2 ) Use permits or licenses-$50-$5,000.
( 3 ) Actions taken to approve plans for fills, structures, or other obstructions under section 26a of the TVA Act—$100-$5,000.
( 4 ) Abandonment of transmission line easements and rights-of-way—$100-$1,500.
( 5 ) Quota deer hunt or turkey hunt applications—$5-$25.
( b ) *Basis of charge.* The administrative charge assessed by the responsible land manager shall, to the extent applicable, include the following costs: ( 1 ) Appraisal of the land or landrights affected;
( 2 ) Assessing applicable rental fees;
( 3 ) Compliance inspections and other field investigations;
( 4 ) Title and record searches;
( 5 ) Preparation for and conducting public auction and negotiated sales;
( 6 ) Mapping and surveying;
( 7 ) Preparation of conveyance instrument, permit, or other authorization or approval instrument;
( 8 ) Coordination of the proposed action within TVA and with other Federal, State, and local agencies;
( 9 ) Legal review; and
( 10 ) Administrative overheads associated with the transaction.
( c ) *Assessment of charge when actual administrative costs significantly exceed established range.* When the responsible land manager determines that the actual administrative costs are expected to significantly exceed the range of costs established in paragraph (a) of this section, such manager shall not proceed with the TVA action until agreement is reached on payment of a charge calculated to cover TVA's actual administrative costs.
( d ) *Quota deer hunt and turkey hunt application fees.* A fee for each person in the amount prescribed by the responsible land manager must accompany the complete application form for a quota deer hunt and turkey hunt permit. Applications will not be processed unless accompanied by the correct fee amount. No refunds will be made to unsuccessful applicants, except that fees received after the application due date will be refunded.
( e ) *Additional charges.* In addition to the charges assessed under these regulations, TVA may impose a charge in connection with environmental reviews or other environmental investigations it conducts under its policies or procedures implementing the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4321 *et seq.*).
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: GIS-basedidentification of areas with mineral resource potential for six selecteddeposit groups, Bureau of Land Management central Yukon planning area, Alaska**
 
Report | Plates1-12
Metadata TXT | Metadata HTML | Metadata XML | Metadata FAQ HTML
Complete data package ZIP
Appendices: A XLS | BPDF | C XLS | D XLS | EZIP
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.76:2015-1021
Item Number:0624-H (online)
CGP systemNumber:000943932
 
May 31, 2018
# C_2006331EN.01003801.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/38

---

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 5 December 2006 — Angelidis v Parliament

(Case T-424/04) (1)

1

(Officials - Staff report - Action for annulment - No consultation of the previous immediate superior - Statement of reasons - Action for compensation - Late establishment - Non-material damage - Admissibility)

(2006/C 331/83)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Angel Angelidis (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: É. Boigelot, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: M. Mustapha Pacha and J. de Wachter, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

In the first place, annulment of the staff report relating to the applicant, an official in Grade A 3 of the European Parliament, for the period from 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2002 and, second, application for compensation in respect of the harm allegedly suffered by reason both of the alleged irregularities in the disputed staff report and of its allegedly late establishment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the application; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application;

| 2. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 314, 18.12.2004.

1

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Cambridge Heart, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, Roderick de Greef, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: March 30, 2007 |  | /s/ RODERICK DE GREEF  
|                      |  | Roderick de Greef      
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer
FORM RD 2006-46 (Rev. 01-98)

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE MANUAL ISSUE No.

RURAL DEVELOPMENT WSAL PN 610

Washington, D.C 20250 DATE

April 3, 2024

PROCEDURE NOTICE

NOTICE

INSERT RD INS 2006-KK RURAL DEVELOPMENT FRAUD RISK MANAGEMENT POLICY. 

(WSAL)

Fraud Risk Management is the process of identifying, understanding, and responding to fraud 

risks. It is required by both the Payment Integrity Information Act of 2019 (PIIA) and OMB 

Circular No. A-123. RD must maintain a system to detect, stop, and/or prevent both internal 

and external fraud. 

Fraud hurts everyone and is a common risk that should not be ignored. Doing so will 

eventually result in damage to morale and jeopardize the reputation of Rural Development

(RD). We are accountable to appropriately manage taxpayer dollars and deliver our mission 

to improve the quality of life in Rural America with a high standard of ethical behavior. 

Fraud impacts everyone through direct influence or indirectly through increased taxes and 

costs of products and services.

We are committed to preventing fraud and cultivating an anti-fraud culture across all 

aspects of RD. Our responsibility extends to protecting public interests by reducing 

exposure through staff education designed to help employees at all levels recognize, 

prevent, and detect potential fraud activities.

oOo

READ PROCEDURE - DISCUSS IN STAFF CONFERENCE - KEEP PROCEDURE MANUAL UP TO DATE
# C_2012250EN.01000801.xml

| 18.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 250/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 250/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 June 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione — Italy) — Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze, Agenzia delle Entrate v Elsacom NV

(Case C-294/11) (1)

1

(Eighth VAT Directive - Arrangements for the refund of VAT to taxable persons not established in the territory of the country - Time-limit within which refund applications are to be submitted - Time bar)

2012/C 250/13

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Corte suprema di cassazione

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Ministero dell’Economia e delle Finanze, Agenzia delle Entrate

Applicants:

Defendant: Elsacom NV

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Corte suprema di Cassazione — Interpretation of Article 7(1) of Eighth Council Directive 79/1072/EEC of 6 December 1979 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Arrangements for the refund of value added tax to taxable persons not established in the territory of the country (OJ 1979 L 331, p. 11) — Period of six months from the end of the calendar year in which value added tax became chargeable within which to submit an application for refund of that tax — The legal significance of the period laid down by the directive

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The six-month time limit laid down in the last sentence of the first subparagraph of Article 7(1) of Eighth Council Directive 79/1072/EC of 6 December 1979 on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Arrangements for the refund of value added tax to taxable persons not established in the territory of the country — for submitting an application for a value added tax refund is a mandatory time limit.

---

(1)  OJ C 252, 27.8.2011.

1

---
Exhibit 99.1




                         CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of AccessTel, Inc. (the "Company") does hereby certify, to
such officer's knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 of
the Company fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information
contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                                  /s/ DAVID C. MERRELL
Date:  June 11, 2003                         By:  _________________________
                                                  David C. Merrell
                                                  President and Chief
                                                    Financial Officer