alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010274EN.01002303.xml

| 9.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 274/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 274/23

---

Action brought on 10 June 2010 — PPG and SNF v ECHA

(Case T-268/10)

()

2010/C 274/37

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Polyelectrolyte Producers Group GEIE (PPG) (Brussels, Belgium) and SNF SAS (Andrezieux Boutheon, France) (represented by: K. Van Maldegem, R. Cana, lawyers and P. Sellar, Solicitor)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Chemical Agency (ECHA)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | declare the application admissible and well-founded; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the application admissible and well-founded;

| — | annul the contested act; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested act;

| — | order ECHA to pay the costs of these proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

—

order ECHA to pay the costs of these proceedings;

| — | take such other or further measure as justice may require. |
| --- | --- |

—

take such other or further measure as justice may require.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicants seek the partial annulment of the decision of the European Chemicals Agency (“ECHA”) to identify acrylamide (CE no 201-173-7) (CAS Number 79-06-1) as a substance meeting the criteria set out in Article 57 Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (1) (“REACH”), in accordance with Article 59 REACH.

o

1

The applicants consider that the contested act is unlawful because it is based on an assessment of acrylamide that is scientifically and legally flawed since it relies on the evidence that is not sufficiently reliable and cogent. In the applicant’s opinion, ECHA committed a manifest error of appraisal in adopting the contested act, in breach of Articles 2(8) and 59 REACH and in breach of its duty to carefully and impartially examine the evidence.

Further, the applicants claim that the contested act infringes a series of general principles of EU law such as principle of proportionality and of non-discrimination since it discriminates against acrylamide with regard to other comparable substances without any objective justification.

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC (OJ 2006 L 396, p. 1).

1

---
### §36. Recovery of damages, etc., for antitrust violations on claim against person based on official action directed by local government, or official or employee thereof acting in an official capacity

#### (a) Prohibition in general

No damages, interest on damages, costs or attorney's fees may be recovered under section 4, 4A, or 4C of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. 15, 15a, or 15c) in any claim against a person based on any official action directed by a local government, or official or employee thereof acting in an official capacity.

#### (b) Nonapplication of prohibition for cases commenced before effective date of provisions

Subsection (a) shall not apply with respect to cases commenced before the effective date of this Act.

(Pub. L. 98–544, §4, Oct. 24, 1984, 98 Stat. 2750.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

For effective date of this Act, referred to in subsec. (b), see Effective Date note below.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective thirty days before Oct. 24, 1984, see section 6 of Pub. L. 98–544, set out as a note under section 34 of this title.
## Program Evaluations

                  -  Evaluation Reports 
                  -  Evaluation Policies 
                  -  Ongoing Evaluations 

#   Evaluation Reports

Proper reporting of evaluation background, methodology, and results is a key step to fostering understanding of services and programs provided by SAMHSA and the positive impact they may have at the national and international levels. SAMHSA’s evaluation findings are instructive as the agency seeks to promote effective programs and to keep with its FY2023 - FY2026 Strategic Plan priority area #4: improving data collection, analysis, dissemination, and program and policy evaluation.

View all evaluation reports →
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000835541
<NAME> SOLECTRON CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-25-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-26-1999
<CASH>                                         436,166
<SECURITIES>                                 1,034,489
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,256,910
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,132
<INVENTORY>                                  1,495,754
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,333,724
<PP&E>                                       1,244,236
<DEPRECIATION>                                 568,508
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,227,197
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,373,620
<BONDS>                                        943,909
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           272
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,900,312
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,227,197
<SALES>                                      2,501,803
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,501,803
<CGS>                                        2,268,689
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,268,689
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                93,317
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   899
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,865
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                149,256
<INCOME-TAX>                                    47,762
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            101,494
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                       (3,480)
<NET-INCOME>                                    98,014
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.35


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report of Prospect Medical Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 30, 2008 (the "Report"), I, Mike Heather, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



August 12, 2008

/s/MIKE HEATHER Mike Heather
Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
§ 93.700 Definitions. Wherever in this subpart the following terms are used, unless the context otherwise requires, they shall be construed, respectively, to mean: *Administrator.* The Administrator of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service or any other employee of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, United States Department of Agriculture, delegated to act in the Administrator's stead.
*Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.* The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service of the United States Department of Agriculture (APHIS).
*Brushtail possum.* Vulpine phalangers (*Trichosurus vulpecula*) of the family Phalangeridae.
*Delivery.* The transfer of goods or interest in goods from one person to another.
*Enter (entry).* To introduce into the commerce of the United States after release from government detention.
*Hedgehog.* All members of the family Erinaceidae.
*Import (imported, importation).* To bring into the territorial limits of the United States.
*Inspector.* An employee of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service authorized to perform duties required under this subpart.
*Person.* Any individual, corporation, company, association, firm, partnership, society, or joint stock company.
*Region.* Any defined geographic land area identifiable by geological, political, or surveyed boundaries. A region may consist of any of the following: ( 1 ) A national entity (country);
( 2 ) Part of a national entity (zone, county, department, municipality, parish, Province, State, etc.)
( 3 ) Parts of several national entities combined into an area; or
( 4 ) A group of national entities (countries) combined into a single area.
*Tenrec.* All members of the family Tenrecidae.
*United States.* All of the States of the United States, the District of Columbia, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands of the United States, and all other territories and possessions of the United States.
[55 FR 34195, Aug. 2, 1990. Redesignated and amended at 62 FR 56012, 56020, Oct. 28, 1997]
null

83.33359
# C_2014421EN.01002702.xml

| 24.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 421/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 421/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2014 — Alcoa Trasformazioni v Commission

(Case T-177/10) (1)

1

((State aid - Electricity - Preferential tariff - Decision declaring aid incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery - Advantage - Obligation to state reasons - Amount of the aid - New aid))

2014/C 421/37

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Alcoa Trasformazioni Srl (Portoscuso, Italy) (represented by: M. Siragusa, T. Müller-Ibold, F. Salerno, G. Scassellati Sforzolini and G. Rizza, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci and E. Gippini Fournier, agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the applicant: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, Agent, and S. Fiorentino, avvocato dello Stato)

Intervener in support of the applicant:

Re:

Re:

Action for annulment of Commission Decision 2010/460/EC of 19 November 2009 relating to State Aid C 38/A/04 (ex NN 58/2004) and C 36/B/2006 (ex NN 38/2006) granted by Italy in favour of Alcoa Trasformazioni (OJ 2010, L 227, p. 62).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Alcoa Trasformazioni Srl to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission, including those relating to the application for interim measures; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Alcoa Trasformazioni Srl to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission, including those relating to the application for interim measures;

| 3. | Orders the Italian Republic to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Italian Republic to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 161, 19.6.2010.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 49 (Monday, March 14, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 13610]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5782]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. PR10-14-002; PR11-92-000]


Enterprise Texas Pipeline LLC; Notice of Compliance Filing

    Take notice that on March 1, 2011, Enterprise Texas Pipeline LLC 
(Enterprise Texas) filed a revised Statement of Rates to its Statement 
of Operating Conditions implementing the settled rates and a Refund 
Report pursuant to its September 23, 2010, Settlement Agreement 
approved by a December 16, 2010, Letter Order.
    Any person desiring to participate in this rate filing must file in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be considered 
by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, 
but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or 
motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests 
must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing 
an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that document on the 
Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on or before the 
intervention or protest date need not serve motions to intervene or 
protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 7 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0f494a5d4c40616366616a5c7a7f7f607d7b4f696a7d6c21686079"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9adcdfc8d9d5f4f6f3f4ffc9efeaeaf5e8eedafcffe8f9b4fdf5ec">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, March 15, 2011.

    Dated: March 8, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-5782 Filed 3-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 1317.540 Advertising.

A recipient shall not in any advertising related to employment indicate preference, limitation, specification, or discrimination based on sex unless sex is a bona fide occupational qualification for the particular job in question.
# C_2012250EN.01002002.xml

| 18.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 250/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 250/20

---

Order of the General Court of 26 June 2012 — Solae v OHIM — Delitaste (alpha taste)

(Case T-145/10) (1)

1

2012/C 250/37

Language of the case: Greek

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 148, 5.6.2010.

1

---
```

[113th Congress Public Law 209]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 128 STAT. 2076]]

Public Law 113-209
113th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 787 State Route 17M in Monroe, New York, as the ``National Clandestine 
   Service of the Central Intelligence Agency NCS Officer Gregg David 
 Wenzel Memorial Post Office''. <<NOTE: Dec. 16, 2014 -  [H.R. 2112]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. NATIONAL CLANDESTINE SERVICE OF THE CENTRAL 
                              INTELLIGENCE AGENCY NCS OFFICER 
                              GREGG DAVID WENZEL MEMORIAL POST 
                              OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 787 State Route 17M in Monroe, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``National Clandestine Service of the Central 
Intelligence Agency NCS Officer Gregg David Wenzel Memorial Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``National 
Clandestine Service of the Central Intelligence Agency NCS Officer Gregg 
David Wenzel Memorial Post Office''.

    Approved December 16, 2014.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2112:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 160 (2014):
            June 17, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 8, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
#### §§ 381.403-381.407 [Reserved]
**Exhibit 31.b**I, Marc Teal, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Boston Capital Tax Credit Fund IV L.P.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;     (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and     (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):     (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and     (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     /s/ Marc N. Teal     Marc N. Teal  Principal Financial OfficerDate: October 20, 2006
#### § 93.315 Import permit and declaration for horses.

For all horses offered for importation from Canada, the importer or his or her agent shall present two copies of a declaration as provided in § 93.305.

[55 FR 31495, Aug. 2, 1990. Redesignated and amended at 62 FR 56012, 56017, Oct. 28, 1997]
# C_2012379EN.01001001.xml

| 8.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 379/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 379/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 18 October 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Beroep te Gent — Belgium) — Punch Graphix Prepress Belgium NV v Belgische Staat

(Case C-371/11) (1)

1

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Admissibility - Reference by domestic law to European Union law - Directive 90/435/EEC - Directive 90/434/EEC - Prevention of economic double taxation - Exception - Liquidation of a subsidiary upon a merger - Distribution of profits - Concept of ‘liquidation’)

2012/C 379/16

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hof van Beroep te Gent

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Punch Graphix Prepress Belgium NV

Applicant:

Defendant: Belgische Staat

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Hof van Beroep te Gent — Interpretation of Article 4(1) of Council Directive 90/435/EEC of 23 July 1990 on the common system of taxation applicable in the case of parent companies and subsidiaries of different Member States (OJ 1990 L 225, p. 6) — Prevention of economic double taxation — Exception in respect of profits distributed when a subsidiary is liquidated — Concept of liquidation — Merger by acquisition whereby the subsidiary companies acquired are wound up without going into liquidation — Possibility, for the national tax authorities, of considering that such an operation entails liquidation, pursuant to national tax legislation which treats identically that operation and a merger which actually entails a liquidation

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The concept of ‘liquidation’ in Article 4(1) of Council Directive 90/435/EEC of 23 July 1990 on the common system of taxation applicable in the case of parent companies and subsidiaries of different Member States, as amended by Council Directive 2006/98/EC of 20 November 2006, must be interpreted as meaning that the dissolution of a company in the context of a merger by acquisition cannot be considered to be such a liquidation.

---

(1)  OJ C 282, 24.9.2011.

1

---