alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Together, America Prospers

Priority Housing Access for Displaced Households 

If a natural disaster 

displaces you from your 

home in a USDA Rural 

Development (RD)-

financed multifamily 

property, you may be 

eligible for priority 

placement in other RDfinanced multifamily 

properties. 

Anyone who has 

been displaced by 

a federally-declared 

natural disaster 

such as forest fire, 

hurricane, earthquake, 

tornado, or flood 

should register with 

the Federal Emergency 

Management Agency 

(FEMA), and obtain a 

FEMA number. This 

number may be used 

to apply for different 

types of federal 

assistance, including 

housing.

Current USDA RD multifamily tenants 

displaced by natural disaster are 

entitled to receive a Letter of Priority 

Entitlement — or LOPE — allowing 

the household to apply for housing in 

properties financed by USDA Rural 

Development or U.S. Housing and 

Urban Development (HUD). Tenants 

with LOPEs may receive priority 

placement in vacant units, and also 

may be moved to the top of waitlists 

for RD-financed multifamily properties. 

A LOPE is good for USDA or HUD 

properties anywhere in the United 

States or its territories. 

Disaster Declarations

You may be eligible for a LOPE even if 

the disaster doesn’t have a presidential 

or state declaration. Your property 

management company will be able 

help you find out if you are eligible, 

or you may contact USDA Rural 

Development.

How do I obtain a LOPE? 

USDA Rural Development will issue 

all LOPEs directly to any impacted 

residents of RD-financed multifamily 

properties. You may also contact 

USDA Rural Development to request 

one. To receive a LOPE, you must be 

able to prove you lived in a USDA RD 

multifamily housing property at the time 

of the disaster. RD staff members are 

available to help answer any questions 

about the letter and the process. 

Does it expire? 

Yes, a LOPE expires 120 days after 

it is issued. If necessary, USDA Rural 

Development may issue another letter.

I am a current tenant in a USDAfinanced multifamily property and I 

have a FEMA number. Do I also need 

a LOPE? 

Although it is not required to have a 

LOPE in addition to a FEMA number, 

it is recommended for USDA Rural 

Development tenants. Either a FEMA 

number or a LOPE will ensure you 

receive priority placement in USDAfinanced multifamily properties. 

What if I don’t currently live in a 

USDA-financed property? 

If you are not currently a tenant in 

a USDA RD-financed multifamily 

property, you may still be eligible 

for priority placement if you have 

registered with FEMA. Contact USDA 

Rural Development if you have 

questions about eligibility. 

If you have questions, please visit: https://www.rd.usda.gov/mfh-contacts

As the leading federal agency for rural development prosperity, we work to 

help rural communities grow and prosper. 

For additional resources and information about our business, community 

or housing programs, contact our program specialists at 1-800-670-6553 or 

visit us online at www.rd.usda.gov.

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

May 2021
#### The Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Wilton et al. *v.*The Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Wilton et al.

*Melvin J. Silverman,*in support of the petition.

*Allan B. Johnson,*in opposition.

Submitted March. 19

decided April *2,*1974

The petition by the named defendant for certification for appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Fairfield County at Stamford is denied.
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Seeks Applications to Extend Broadband Access in Rural Communities

WASHINGTON, Nov. 15, 2018 – Assistant to the Secretary for Rural Development Anne Hazlett announced 

today that USDA is accepting applications for loans and loan guarantees to extend access to broadband services 

in rural communities. 

The funding is being provided through USDA’s Rural Broadband Access Loan and Loan Guarantee Program. 

(Broadband Program), which Congress reauthorized in 2014. Applications will be processed on a rolling basis 

throughout Fiscal Year 2019. Award amounts range from $100,000 to $25 million. 

The Broadband Program helps fund costs to construct, improve or acquire facilities and equipment to provide 

broadband service in eligible rural areas. To be eligible for funding, projects must have a minimum rate-of-data 

transmission of 25 megabits downstream and 3 megabits upstream for both mobile and fixed service. 

Applications will be accepted immediately through Sept. 30, 2019. USDA will process loan applications as they 

are received. 

USDA encourages applications that will support recommendations made in the Report to the President of the 

United States from the Task Force on Agriculture and Rural Prosperity (PDF, 5.4 MB) to help improve life in 

rural America. Applicants are encouraged to consider projects that provide measurable results in helping rural 

communities build robust and sustainable economies through strategic investments in infrastructure, 

partnerships and innovation. Key strategies include: 

• Achieving e-Connectivity for Rural America 

• Developing the Rural Economy 

• Harnessing Technological Innovation 

• Supporting a Rural Workforce 

• Improving Quality of Life 

Applications must be submitted online at https://www.rd.usda.gov/programs-services/rd-apply. Additional 

information is available on page 57406 of the Nov. 15, 2018 Federal Register.

#
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                            1998
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1998
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1998
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             4816
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          3000
<OTHER-SE>                                      (5818)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1998
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1812
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (7)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1805)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1805)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1805)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00



</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement, Interior.

# ACTION:

List of Restricted Joint Bidders; Correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement published a notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         on February 9, 2011, entitled: “List of Restricted Joint Bidders” that contained an error. We are correcting the name of an oil company listed under Group VIII in that notice.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Samuel T. Cable, 703-787-1322.

### Correction

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         of February 9, 2011, in FR Doc. 2011-2791, on page 7230, in the first column, correct the third line in the Group VIII section to read:                    

Statoil USA E&P Inc.

Dated: March 3, 2011.

Robert P. LaBelle,

Associate Director for Offshore Energy and Minerals Management.

[FR Doc. 2011-5408 Filed 3-9-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P
#### § 329.8 Authority for condemnation or seizure under other provisions of law.

The provisions of this part relating to seizure, condemnation and disposition of articles or livestock do not derogate from authority for condemnation or seizure conferred by other provisions of the Act, or other laws.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

895 

CA 10-01892 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. 

 

GRAY WOLF CORP., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, 

V ORDER

GLEASON ESTATES ASSOCIATES, LP, 

DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT,

ET AL., DEFENDANT. 

(APPEAL NO. 2.) 

 

WOODS OVIATT GILMAN LLP, ROCHESTER (WARREN B. ROSENBAUM OF COUNSEL),

FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT. 

LECLAIR RYAN, ROCHESTER (GREGORY J. MASCITTI OF COUNSEL), FOR

DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Kenneth

R. Fisher, J.), entered August 5, 2010 in a foreclosure action. The

order denied the motion of plaintiff for leave to reargue and renew. 

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal from the order insofar as

it denied reargument is unanimously dismissed (see Empire Ins. Co. v

Food City, 167 AD2d 983, 984) and the order is affirmed without costs.

 

Entered: October 7, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan

Clerk of the Court
##### 



Name of Subsidiary of Alliance Semiconductor Corporation
    
    Jurisdiction or State of IncorporationAlliance Semiconductor Holding Company, LLC
    
    DelawareAlliance Semiconductor International Corporation
    
    Cayman IslandsAlliance Semiconductor International Corporation
    
    DelawareAlliance Semiconductor (India) Private Limited
    
    IndiaAlliance Semiconductor (S.A.) (Pty) Ltd.
    
    South AfricaAlliance Semiconductor, South Africa, LLC
    
    DelawareAlliance Venture Management, LLC
    
    CaliforniaAlliance Ventures I, LP
    
    CaliforniaAlliance Ventures II, LP
    
    CaliforniaAlliance Ventures III, LP
    
    CaliforniaAlliance Ventures IV, LP
    
    CaliforniaAlliance Ventures V, LP
    
    CaliforniaChip Engines, Inc.
    
    CaliforniaDioptech, Inc.
    
    DelawareNimbus Technology, Inc.
    
    CaliforniaSiPackets, Inc.
    
    CaliforniaSolar Venture Partners, LP
    
    California
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7500
ERIC DONNELL SAUNDERS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95-1059-N) Submitted: May 1, 1997 Decided: May 7, 1997 Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Eric Donnell Saunders, Appellant Pro Se. Eugene Paul Murphy, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find noreversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Saunders v. Angelone , No. CA-95-1059-N (E.D. Va. Sept. 20, 1996).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Elmer E. Kasper, appellant, v. Dorothy A. Kasper, appellee.

240 N. W. 2d 591

Filed April 7, 1976.

No. 40353.

Alfred A. Fiedler, for appellant.

A. James McArthur, for appellee.

Heard before White, C. J., Boslaugh, Newton, and Clinton, JJ., and Reagan, District Judge.

White, C. J.

This case involves a petition to modify a divorce decree. The plaintiff, Elmer E. Kasper, was divorced from the defendant,- Dorothy A. Kasper, in 1972. The divorce decree, dated March 14, 1972, provided: “That the Plaintiff shall pay to the Defendant in the way of alimony the sum of $24,200.00, payable at the rate of $200.00 per month for a period of 121 months to the Clerk of the District Court of Douglas County, Nebraska.”

On November 26, 1974, the defendant remarried. In March 1975, the plaintiff filed an application to modify the March 14, 1972, divorce decree with respect to alimony. The District Court overruled the application to modify. The plaintiff filed a motion for a new trial, which was overruled. The plaintiff appeals. We affirm the judgment of the District Court.

The plaintiff argues that he should no longer be required to pay alimony pursuant to the decree because of the defendant’s remarriage. The plaintiff urges us to *755apply the provisions of sections 42-347 to 42-379, R. R. S. 1943, to this case and to terminate the alimony.

The alimony award in the March 14, 1972, divorce decree was an award of alimony in gross. It was unqualified. No provision was made in the decree that it should terminate upon death or remarriage of the recipient.

The law here is. clear. “An unqualified allowance of alimony in gross made before July 6, 1972, whether payable immediately in full or periodically in installments, and whether intended solely as a property settlement or as an allowance for support, or both, is not subject to modification.” Bryant v. Bryant, 191 Neb. 539, 216 N. W. 2d 162 (1974). See, also, Karrer v. Karrer, 190 Neb. 610, 211 N. W. 2d 116 (1973); Ziegenbein v. Damme, 138 Neb. 320, 292 N. W. 921 (1940). The facts of this case fall clearly within the above-cited authorities. There is no merit to plaintiff’s contention.

The judgment of the District Court is correct and is affirmed.

Affirmed.
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF
      2002





In
      connection with the annual report of
      Rapid Link, Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year
      ended October 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
      on
      the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Christopher J. Canfield, Chief Financial
      Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
      knowledge:





(1)
      This Report fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and





(2)
      The information contained in this
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      results of operations of the Company.








Date:
                January 22, 2008
            /s/
                Christopher J. CanfieldChristopher
                J. CanfieldPresident,
                Chief Financial
                Officer,Treasurer
                and Director
# C_2006212EN.01004802.xml

| 2.9.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 212/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.9.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 212/48

---

Action brought on 22 June 2006 — Bakema v Commission

(Case F-68/06)

(2006/C 212/85)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Reint Jacob Bakema (Zuidlaren, the Netherlands) (represented by: L. Rijpkema, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the authority authorised to conclude contracts of employment (AACC) dated 22 March 2006; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the authority authorised to conclude contracts of employment (AACC) dated 22 March 2006;

| — | Order the AACC to engage the applicant in function group IV, grade 16; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the AACC to engage the applicant in function group IV, grade 16;

| — | Declare that the applicant must be granted an adequate sum by way of damages. |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that the applicant must be granted an adequate sum by way of damages.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant, a former member of the so-called local technical assistance staff (ALAT), has been engaged as a member of the contract staff and classified in function group IV, grade 14.

In his action, the applicant claims that the defendant made inaccurate application of the relevant legislation, especially of Article 82 (2) (c) of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the Communities (CEOS) and Article 2 of General Implementation Provisions (GIP) 49-2004. The applicant submits that the defendant's interpretation of the term ‘diploma’ contained in those articles is inaccurate and arbitrary. In the calculation of his professional experience, the defendant should have taken into consideration all the activities the applicant carried out after obtaining his ‘kandidaatsdiploma’.

The applicant further claims that, even if he used to be a member of ALAT before his engagement as a member of contract staff, the principle laid down in Article 86 of the CEOS should be applied to his case. According to that principle, where an agent moves to a new post within a function group, he shall not be classified in a lower grade or step than in his former post.

---
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 47 (Thursday, March 10, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 13130]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5433]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XA281


Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of a public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council will convene a 
meeting of the Ad Hoc Reef Fish Limited Access Privilege Program 
Advisory Panel.

DATES: The meeting will convene at 1 p.m. on Monday, March 28, 2011 and 
conclude by 5 p.m. on Tuesday, March 29, 2011.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Gulf of Mexico Fishery 
Management Council, 2203 North Lois Avenue, Suite 1100, Tampa, FL 
33607; telephone: (813) 348-1630.
    Council address: Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council, 2203 N. 
Lois Avenue, Suite 1100, Tampa, FL 33607.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Assane Diagne, Economist; Gulf of 
Mexico Fishery Management Council; telephone: (813) 348-1630.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Ad Hoc Reef Fish Limited Access 
Privilege Program Advisory Panel will meet to discuss charter for-hire 
days-at-sea and headboat individual fishing quota pilot programs, and, 
fishing communities in fisheries management.
    Copies of the agenda and other related materials can be obtained by 
calling (813) 348-1630.
    Although other non-emergency issues not on the agenda may come 
before the Advisory Panel for discussion, in accordance with the 
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, those issues 
may not be the subject of formal action during this meeting. Actions of 
the Advisory Panel will be restricted to those issues specifically 
identified in the agenda and any issues arising after publication of 
this notice that require emergency action under Section 305(c) of the 
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, provided the 
public has been notified of the Council's intent to take action to 
address the emergency.
Special Accommodations
    These meetings are physically accessible to people with 
disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other 
auxiliary aids should be directed to Trish Kennedy at the Council (see 
ADDRESSES) at least 5 working days prior to the meeting.

    Dated: March 4, 2011.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-5433 Filed 3-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 141 (Friday, July 23, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 43159]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-18127]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Notice of Solicitation of Nominations for Appointment as a Member 
of the Biomass Research and Development Technical Advisory Committee; 
Correction

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of solicitation of members; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On July 15, 2010, the Department of Energy published a notice 
of solicitation of members (75 FR 41166). This document corrects that 
notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laura McCann, Designated Federal 
Official for the Committee, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable 
Energy, U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., 
Washington, DC 20585; (202) 586-7766; e-mail: laura.mccann@ee.doe.gov 
or Christina Fagerholm at (202) 586-2933; e-mail: 
christina.fagerholm@ee.doe.gov.
    In the Federal Register of July 15, 2010, in FR Doc. 2010-17285, on 
page 41167, please make the following correction:
    Under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, first column, the second to the 
last paragraph is corrected to read:
    ``Nominations are open to all individuals without regard to race, 
color, religion, sex, national origin, age, mental or physical 
handicap, marital status, or sexual orientation. Please note, however, 
that registered lobbyists and individuals already serving on another 
Federal Advisory Committee are ineligible for nomination.''
    The deadline for Technical Advisory Committee member nominations is 
July 30, 2010.

    Issued in Washington, DC on July 20, 2010.
Rachel Samuel,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-18127 Filed 7-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```