alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OFFICE OF PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT AND RISK ASSESSMENT (OPMRA)

1400 Independence Avenue, SW Room 4121

Washington, DC 20250

Victor Vu, Deputy Assistant Administrator

Office of the Deputy Assistant Administrator

Name Title E-Mail Telephone

Victor Vu Deputy Assistant Administrator Victor.Vu@usda.gov (202) 720-1449

Robin Meigel Finance Specialist Robin.Meigel@usda.gov (202) 720-9452

Karen Dixon Administrative Assistant Karen.Dixon@usda.gov (202) 720-5434

Shameka Casey Administrative Assistant Shameka.Casey@usda.gov (202) 690-5268

Post-Loan Services Financial Operations Branch

Name Title E-Mail Telephone

Cheryl Munnelyn Branch Chief Cheryl.Munnelyn@usda.gov (202) 720-8936

George Bishara Loan Specialist George.Bishara@usda.gov (202) 692-5315

Marina Chu Loan Specialist Marina.Chu@usda.gov (202) 720-8459

Claudette Clair Loan Specialist Claudette.Clair@usda.gov (202) 720-4491

“JP” Dossa-Sossavi Loan Specialist Oscens.DossaSossavi@usda.gov (202) 720-3515

Tracey Kost-Brady Loan Specialist Tracey.Kost@usda.gov (202) 720-1913

Sheba Tucker Loan Specialist Sheba.Tucker@usda.gov (202) 720-4831

Jennifer Daugherty Loan Specialist Jennifer.Daugherty@usda.gov (706) 552-2553

Travis Eliason Loan Specialist Travis.Eliason@usda.gov (435) 868-3950

Post-Loan Services Engineering Branch

Name Title E-Mail Telephone

Carmelo Nieves Branch Chief Carmelo.Nieves@usda.gov (863) 438-3735

Miguel Almario Mechanical Engineer Miguel.Almario@usda.gov (202) 720-1507

Johnson Nwakamma Mechanical Engineer Johnson.Nwakamma@usda.gov (678) 202-9271

Mike Hugh Mechanical Engineer Michael.Hugh@usda.gov (202) 692-4922

Kevin Zhong Electrical Engineer Huan.Zhong@usda.gov (202) 260-8062

Luis Rodriguez-Pagan Electrical Engineer Luis.Rodriguez-Pagan@usda.gov (661) 483-3142

David Drake Electrical Engineer David.Drake@usda.gov (503) 414-3373

Fred Hampton Electrical Engineer Fred.Hampton@usda.gov

Loan Monitoring and Servicing Branch

Name Title E-Mail Telephone

Greg Snearly Branch Chief Gregory.Snearly@usda.gov (202) 819-2521

Mark Moore Loan Specialist William.Moore@usda.gov (202) 720-6484

Tammy Payton Loan Specialist Tammy.Payton@usda.gov (202) 720-2732

Rashid Sesay Loan Specialist Rashid.Sesay@usda.gov (202) 692-0361

Victoria Graves Loan Specialist Victoria.Graves@usda.gov (307) 683-4194

Nicole Wheeler Loan and Grant Technician Nicole.Wheeler@usda.gov (202) 205-9415

Kristina Neal Loan and Grant Technician Kristina.Neal@usda.gov (202) 720-5202

Nofisat Eko Loan and Grant Technician Nofisat.Eko@usda.gov (202) 720-0427

Jose E. Rivera Castillo Loan and Grant Technician Jose.RiveraCastillo@usda.gov (859) 224-7435

Arthur “Chad” Willett Loan and Grant Technician Arthur.Willett@usda.gov (423) 278-5722

Cecilia Hernandez Loan and Grant Technician Cecilia.Hernandez2@usda.gov (254) 613-6621

Updated 4/8/2024.

RUS ELECTRIC PROGRAM HEADQUARTERS CONTACTS
September 8, 2005 Page 1 of 1 

Trench foot or Immersion foot 

What is trench foot?

Trench foot, also known as immersion foot, occurs when the feet are wet for long periods of time. It can 

be quite painful, but it can be prevented and treated. 

 

What are the symptoms of trench foot?

Symptoms of trench foot include a tingling and/or itching sensation, pain, swelling, cold and blotchy skin, 

numbness, and a prickling or heavy feeling in the foot. The foot may be red, dry, and painful after it 

becomes warm and blisters may form, followed by skin and tissue dying and falling off. In severe cases 

untreated trench foot can involve the toes, heels, or the entire foot. 

How is trench foot prevented and treated?

When possible, air dry and elevate your feet, and exchange wet shoes and socks for dry ones to help 

prevent the development of trench foot. 

Treatment for trench foot is similar to the treatment for frostbite. Take the following steps: 

• Thoroughly clean and dry your feet.

• Put on clean, dry socks daily.

• Treat the affected part by applying warm packs or soaking in warm water (102° to 110° F) for 

approximately 5 minutes. 

• When sleeping or resting, do not wear socks.

• Obtain medical assistance as soon as possible.

If you have a foot wounds your feet foot may be more prone to infection. Check your feet at least once a 

day for infections or worsening of symptoms. 

For more information, visit www.bt.cdc.gov/disasters, 

or call CDC at 800-CDC-INFO (English and Spanish) or 888-232-6348 (TTY).
§ 552.1 Affixing stamps and marking products for export; issuance of export certificates; clearance of vessels and transportation. ( a ) The manner of affixing stamps and marking products for export is that prescribed in § 322.1(a) of this chapter.
( b ) The requirements for the issuance of export certificates are as prescribed in § 322.2 of this chapter.
( c ) The requirements for clearing vessels and other transportation vehicles are set out in § 322.4 of this chapter.
[80 FR 75616, Dec. 2, 2015]
#### § 72.6 Interstate movement of cattle from quarantined areas not eradicating ticks.

Cattle in quarantined areas where tick eradication is not being conducted[3] may be shipped or transported interstate in accordance with §§ 72.9 through 72.15 under the following conditions: The cattle must have been dipped twice with a permitted dip as provided in § 72.13, with an interval of 7 to 12 days between dippings immediately preceding shipment, at a designated dipping station approved under § 72.16 and located in the State of origin of the shipment or, in specific cases, after having been otherwise treated at a designated dipping station under the supervision of an APHIS inspector and in a manner approved by the Administrator. In all cases, the cattle must be inspected by an APHIS inspector just prior to final dipping, found to be apparently free of ticks, and be certified as such by APHIS before the cattle may be released for interstate movement.

[66 FR 21061, Apr. 27, 2001]

###### Footnotes -
  72.6

[3] Information regarding the identities of such areas may be obtained from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Veterinary Services, National Animal Health Programs, 4700 River Road Unit 43, Riverdale, Maryland 20737-1231.
### §2142. Regular lieutenants (junior grade); separation for failure of selection for promotion

Each officer of the Regular Coast Guard appointed under section 2101 of this title who is serving in the grade of lieutenant (junior grade) and who has failed of selection for promotion to the grade of lieutenant for the second time, shall:

(1) be honorably discharged on June 30 of the promotion year in which his second failure of selection occurs; or

(2) if he so requests, be honorably discharged at an earlier date without loss of benefits that would accrue if he were discharged on that date under clause (1); or

(3) if, on the date specified for his discharge in this section, he is eligible for retirement under any law, be retired on that date.

(Added Pub. L. 88–130, §1(10)(C), Sept. 24, 1963, 77 Stat. 184, §282; amended Pub. L. 94–546, §1(21), Oct. 18, 1976, 90 Stat. 2520; renumbered §2142 and amended Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §§112(b), 123(b)(2), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4216, 4240.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282, §123(b)(2), substituted "section 2101" for "section 211" in introductory provisions.

Pub. L. 115–282, §112(b), renumbered section 282 of this title as this section.

1976—Pub. L. 94–546 substituted "promotion year" for "fiscal year" in cl. (1).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Retired Pay on or Prior to September 24, 1963

Savings provisions in section 5(g) of Pub. L. 88–130 providing that Pub. L. 88–130 does not affect the retired pay of anyone retired on or prior to Sept. 24, 1963, are set out as a note under section 2101 of this title.

#### Effectiveness of Election, Change, or Revocation of Election of Annuity

Savings provisions in section 5(h) of Pub. L. 88–130 providing that notwithstanding section 1431 of Title 10, Armed Forces, an election, change or revocation thereof affecting an annuity, by an officer retired under this section, is effective if made prior to the first day of the third month following September 1963, are set out as a note under section 2101 of this title.
#### American Express Equipment Finance Corporation, Respondent, v Helen B. Mercado, Appellant.

[824 NYS2d 187]

*881Carpinello, J.

Appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court (McCarthy, J.), entered July 8, 2005 in Ulster County, which, inter alia, denied defendant’s motion to compel discovery, and (2) from an order of said court, entered December 1, 2005 in Ulster County, which, upon renewal, adhered to its prior decision.

By a written agreement dated January 8, 2001, defendant, a physical therapist, leased certain medical equipment from plaintiff and agreed to make 60 monthly payments in the amount of approximately $1,680. The payments were made until November 2003 at which time defendant defaulted, prompting the instant action for breach of the lease. Defendant answered and alleged, in substance, that she was defrauded by her employer at the time she signed the lease. Specifically, defendant contends that the total lease payments far exceeded the fair market value of the equipment, that she never in fact received the equipment covered by the lease and that she was, in any event, pressured into signing it because this employer was her sponsor for a permanent United States visa, a document required to permit her to remain in this country legally.

After joinder of issue, defendant served various discovery demands related to plaintiffs business practices generally. Following objections by plaintiff and a defense motion to compel, Supreme Court ultimately granted plaintiff a protective order striking the contested discovery demands as palpably improper. Defendant now appeals from that order and from an order which, upon renewal, adhered to its prior decision. We affirm.

On appeal, defendant argues that the contested discovery demands are relevant to her defense that plaintiff’s alleged “lax” business practices evidenced its intent to “assume the risk” of a fraudulent transaction such as that purportedly perpetrated on her. The assumption of risk doctrine as defined under *Turcotte v Fell*(68 NY2d 432 [1986]) is a concept inimitable to tort claims, specifically those arising out of sporting events. Suffice it to say, it has no applicability to a breach of contract cause of action.

Furthermore, defendant’s related assertion that she can defend this action based upon the “comparative negligence” of plaintiff is equally contrary to well-settled principles of law, *882which expressly preclude a plaintiffs culpable conduct from being asserted as a defense in a breach of contract action (see *Nastro Contr. v Agusta,*217 AD2d 874, 875 [1995]). While it is theoretically possible that the employer’s alleged fraud, if it can be connected to plaintiff in some legally cognizable fashion, might ultimately support a defense of fraudulent inducement (see *United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v Delmar Dev. Partners, LLC,*22 AD3d 1017, 1019 [2005]; *but see Barrier Sys. v A.F.C. Enters.,*264 AD2d 432 [1999]), any discovery demands unrelated to the particular transaction at issue are clearly irrelevant.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Spain and Mugglin, JJ., concur. Ordered that the orders are affirmed, with costs.
# C_2011030EN.01005705.xml

| 29.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/57

---

Order of the General Court of 18 November 2010 — Ferracci v Commission

(Case T-192/10) (1)

1

()

2011/C 30/105

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 179, 3.7.2010.

1

---
### §1681k. Public record information for employment purposes

#### (a) In general

A consumer reporting agency which furnishes a consumer report for employment purposes and which for that purpose compiles and reports items of information on consumers which are matters of public record and are likely to have an adverse effect upon a consumer's ability to obtain employment shall—

(1) at the time such public record information is reported to the user of such consumer report, notify the consumer of the fact that public record information is being reported by the consumer reporting agency, together with the name and address of the person to whom such information is being reported; or

(2) maintain strict procedures designed to insure that whenever public record information which is likely to have an adverse effect on a consumer's ability to obtain employment is reported it is complete and up to date. For purposes of this paragraph, items of public record relating to arrests, indictments, convictions, suits, tax liens, and outstanding judgments shall be considered up to date if the current public record status of the item at the time of the report is reported.

#### (b) Exemption for national security investigations

Subsection (a) does not apply in the case of an agency or department of the United States Government that seeks to obtain and use a consumer report for employment purposes, if the head of the agency or department makes a written finding as prescribed under section 1681b(b)(4)(A) of this title.

(Pub. L. 90–321, title VI, §613, as added Pub. L. 91–508, title VI, §601, Oct. 26, 1970, 84 Stat. 1133; amended Pub. L. 105–347, §4(b), Nov. 2, 1998, 112 Stat. 3210.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1998—Pub. L. 105–347 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), inserted heading, and added subsec. (b).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1998 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 105–347 deemed to have same effective date as amendments made by section 2403 of Pub. L. 104–208, see section 7 of Pub. L. 105–347, set out as a note under section 1681a of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective upon the expiration of one hundred and eighty days following Oct. 26, 1970, see section 504(d) of Pub. L. 90–321, as added by Pub. L. 91–508, set out as a note under section 1681 of this title.
# C_2010246EN.01004102.xml

| 11.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/41

---

Action brought on 27 may 2010 — Stratakis/Commission

(Case F-37/10)

()

2010/C 246/71

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Sofoklis Stratakis (Athens, Greece) (represented by: F. Sigalas, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

The subject matter and description of the proceedings

The subject matter and description of the proceedings

The annulment of the decision of the selection board for open competition EPSO/AD/129/08 not to include the name of the applicant on the reserve list published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claim that the Court should:

| — | Annul the decision of July 30, 2009, of the selection board for open competition EPSO/AD/129/08 not to include his name on the reserve list published in the Official Journal of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of July 30, 2009, of the selection board for open competition EPSO/AD/129/08 not to include his name on the reserve list published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

| — | Order the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the European Commission to pay the costs.

---
### §3352. Emergency exceptions for disaster areas

#### (a) In general

Each Federal financial institutions regulatory agency may, by regulation or order, make exceptions to this chapter, and to standards prescribed pursuant to this chapter, for transactions involving institutions for which the agency is the primary Federal regulator with respect to real property located within a disaster area if the agency—

(1) makes the exception not later than 30 months after the date on which the President determines, pursuant to section 5170 of title 42, that a major disaster exists in the area; and

(2) determines that the exception—

(A) would facilitate recovery from the major disaster; and

(B) is consistent with safety and soundness.

#### (b) 3-year limit on exceptions

Any exception made under this section shall expire not later than 3 years after the date of the determination referred to in subsection (a)(1).

#### (c) Publication required

Any Federal financial institutions regulatory agency shall publish in the Federal Register a statement that—

(1) describes any exception made under this section; and

(2) explains how the exception—

(A) would facilitate recovery from the major disaster; and

(B) is consistent with safety and soundness.

#### (d) "Disaster area" defined

For purposes of this section, the term "disaster area" means an area in which the President, pursuant to section 5170 of title 42, has determined that a major disaster exists.

(Pub. L. 101–73, title XI, §1123, as added Pub. L. 102–485, §2, Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2771.)
# C_2006294EN.01001901.xml

| 2.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/19

---

Order of the Court of 28 September 2006 — Unilever Bestfoods (Ireland) Ltd, formerly Van den Bergh Foods Ltd v Commission of the European Communities, Masterfoods Ltd, Richmond Ice Cream Ltd, formerly Richmond Frozen Confectionery Ltd

(Case C-552/03 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Articles 85 and 86 of the EC Treaty (now Articles 81 EC and 82 EC) - Ice creams for immediate consumption - Supply of freezer cabinets to retailers - Exclusivity clause - Right to a fair hearing - Burden of proof)

(2006/C 294/31)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Unilever Bestfoods (Ireland) Ltd (formerly Van den Bergh Foods Ltd) (represented by: M. Nicholson and M. Rowe, Solicitors, M. Biesheuvel and M. De Grave, advocaten)

Applicant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: W. Wils, B. Doherty and A. Whelan, Agents), Masterfoods Ltd (represented by: P. Collins and M. Levitt, Solicitors), Richmond Ice Cream Ltd, formerly Richmond Frozen Confectionery Ltd (represented by: I. Forrester QC)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) of 23 October 2003 in Case T-65/98 Van den Bergh Foods Ltd (formerly HB Ice Cream Limited) v Commission — Dismissal of an action for annulment of Commission Decision of 11 March 1998 relating to a proceeding under Articles 85 and 86 of the EC Treaty (Case Nos IV/34.073, IV/34.395 and IV/35.496 — Van den Bergh Foods Limited) prohibiting the practice of making freezer cabinets available to retailers exclusively for the storage of ice creams produced by the applicant

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Unilever Bestfoods (Ireland) Ltd shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Unilever Bestfoods (Ireland) Ltd shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 59, 6.03.2004.

1

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

VICTOR ADAMS

, §

§ No. 319 , 201 8

Defendant Below, §

Appellant, § Court Below : Superior Court of the

§ State of Delaware

v. §

§ Cr. ID No. 1109011709A (S)

STATE OF DELAWARE, §

§

Plaintiff Below, §

Appellee. §

Submitted: November 7 , 2018

Decided: January 23

, 201 9

Before STRINE

, Chief Justice; SEITZ and TRAYNOR

, Justices.

O R D E R

(1) The appellant, Victor Adams , filed this appeal from the sentence

imposed on May 24, 2018 for his fourth violation of probation (“VOP”). 1 On appeal,

Adams contends that the Superior Court did not credit him for fourteen days he was

held in default of bail before the May 24, 2018 VOP proceeding. The appellee, S tate

of Delaware, has moved to affirm the Superior Court’s judgment on the ground that

it is manifest on the face of Adams’ opening brief that the appeal is without merit.

We agree and affirm.

1 The sentence imposed on May 24, 2018 was ordered discharged after Adams has served nine

months at Level V.2

( 2 ) At the time of the May 24, 2018 hearing for his fourth VO P, Adams

was serving the sentence , imposed on November 17, 2017, f or his third VOP. For

the third VOP, the Superior Court sentenced Adams to four years of Level V

incarceration, suspended after four days for one year of Level II probation.

( 3 ) Appellate review of a sentence is extremely limited and generally ends

upon a determination that the sentence is within statutory limits. 2 When sentencing

a defendant for a VOP, 11 Del. C. § 4334(c) authorizes the Superior Court to impose

any period of incarceration

— up to and including the balance of incarceration

remaining on the original sentence

— so long as the defendant is given credit for all

incarceration previously served and the sent ence does not exceed the incarceration

that a prior iteration of the sentence left suspended. 3

( 4 ) In this case, the record does not reflect that the sentence imposed on

May 24, 2018 exceeded statutory limits. Adams was entitled to time

- served credit

for the fourteen days he was held in default of bail before his VOP hearing and

sentencing on May 24, 2018. 4 But he received that credit

— and more

— when the

Superior Court sentenced him to only three years and six months of the nearly four

2 Shoates v. State , 2018 WL 3912033 (Del. Aug. 14, 2018) (citing Kurzmann v. State , 903 A.2d

702, 714 (Del. 2006)).

3 Pavulak v. State , 880 A.2d 1044, 1046 (Del. 2005).

4 Richardson v. State , 2002 WL 972233 (Del. May 9, 2002) (citing 11 Del. C. § 3901(c )).3

years of unexpired L evel V time that remained from the sentence imposed on

November 17, 2017 for his third VOP.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to affirm is

GRANTED. The judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gary F. Traynor

Justice
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alliance Laundry Systems LLC, Alliance Laundry Corporation and
Alliance Laundry Holdings LLC (the Companies) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bruce P. Rounds, Vice President, and
Chief Financial Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|/s/ BRUCE P. ROUNDS                       
|Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

August 10, 2006
### **CHAPTER 15C—ALASKA NATURAL GAS TRANSPORTATION**

Sec.
719.
Congressional findings.
719a.
Congressional statement of purpose.
719b.
Definitions.
719c.
Federal Power Commission reviews and reports.
719d.
Federal and State officer or agency and other interested persons' reports.
719e.
Presidential decision and report.
719f.
Congressional review.
719g.
Transportation system certificates, rights-of-way, permits, leases, or other authorizations.
719h.
Judicial review.
719i.
Supplemental enforcement authority.
719j.
Export limitations.
719k.
Equal access to facilities.
719 l.
Antitrust laws.
719m.
Authorization of appropriations.
719n.
Separability.
719 o.
Civil rights; affirmative action of Federal officers and agencies; rules: promulgation and enforcement.