alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Seeks Applications to Improve Health Care for People in the Delta Region

WASHINGTON, May 2, 2023 – U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Rural Development Under 

Secretary Xochitl Torres Small today announced that USDA is accepting applications for grants to improve 

health care for people living in persistent poverty counties in the Delta region.

USDA is making up to $3 million in grants available through the Delta Health Care Services Grant Program. 

The program is a collaborative effort among health care professionals, institutions of higher education, research 

centers and other entities. The funding may be used to support activities such as health education programs, 

health care services, job training in health care fields, and developing or expanding public health facilities. To 

qualify for a grant, applicants must be a consortium of regional institutions of higher education, academic health 

and research institutes, and/or economic development entities located within the Delta Region.

The minimum grant award is $50,000. The maximum award is $1 million. Grants will be awarded on a 

competitive basis.

The Delta Region is defined as 252 counties and parishes in Alabama, Arkansas, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, 

Mississippi, Missouri and Tennessee. 

USDA is particularly interested in applications that will advance Biden-Harris Administration priorities to:

• Reduce climate pollution and increase resilience to the impacts of climate change through economic 

support to rural communities.

• Ensure all rural residents have equitable access to Rural Development (RD) programs and benefits from 

RD-funded projects; and 

• Help rural communities recover economically through more and better market opportunities and through 

improved infrastructure.

Additional information on these key priorities is available at https://www.rd.usda.gov/priority-points.

Applications must be submitted electronically by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time July 3, 2023, through Grants.gov.

For additional information, see page 27434 of the May 2, 2023, Federal Register. 

If you’d like to subscribe to USDA Rural Development updates, visit our GovDelivery subscriber page.

###
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1020

To amend chapter 1 of title 9, United States Code, to provide for greater

fairness in the arbitration process relating to motor vehicle franchise

contracts.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

MAY 12, 1999

Mr. GRASSLEY (for himself and Mr. FEINGOLD) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend chapter 1 of title 9, United States Code, to provide

for greater fairness in the arbitration process relating

to motor vehicle franchise contracts.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Motor Vehicle Fran5 chise Contract Arbitration Fairness Act of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. ELECTION OF ARBITRATION.

7 (a) SALES AND SERVICE CONTRACTS.—Chapter 1 of

8 title 9, United States Code, is amended by adding at the

9 end the following new section:
2

•S 1020 IS

1 ‘‘§ 17. Motor vehicle franchise contracts

2 ‘‘(a) For purposes of this section, the term—

3 ‘‘(1) ‘motor vehicle’ has the meaning given such

4 term under section 30102(6) of title 49; and

5 ‘‘(2) ‘motor vehicle franchise contract’ means a

6 contract under which a motor vehicle manufacturer,

7 importer, or distributor sells motor vehicles to any

8 other person for resale to an ultimate purchaser and

9 authorizes such other person to repair and service

10 the manufacturer’s motor vehicles.

11 ‘‘(b) Whenever a motor vehicle franchise contract

12 provides for the use of arbitration to resolve a controversy

13 arising out of or relating to the contract, each party to

14 the contract shall have the option, after the controversy

15 arises and before both parties commence an arbitration

16 proceeding, to reject arbitration as the means of settling

17 the controversy. Any such rejection shall be in writing.

18 ‘‘(c) Whenever arbitration is elected to settle a dis19 pute under a motor vehicle franchise contract, the arbi20 trator shall provide the parties to the contract with a writ21 ten explanation of the factual and legal basis for the

22 award.’’.

23 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—

24 The table of sections for chapter 1 of title 9, United States
3

•S 1020 IS

1 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new

2 item:

‘‘17. Motor vehicle franchise contracts.’’.

3 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

4 The amendments made by section 2 shall apply to

5 contracts entered into, amended, altered, modified, re6 newed, or extended after the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1367 Referred in House (RFH)]

  2d Session
                                S. 1367

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 6, 2000

                 Referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Act which established the Saint-Gaudens National Historic 
Site, in the State of New Hampshire, by modifying the boundary and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
That Public Law 88-543 (16 U.S.C. 461 (note)), which established Saint-
Gaudens National Historic Site is amended--
            (1) in section 3 by striking ``not to exceed sixty-four 
        acres of lands and interests therein'' and inserting ``279 
        acres of lands and buildings, or interests therein'';
            (2) in section 6 by striking ``$2,677,000'' from the first 
        sentence and inserting ``$10,632,000''; and
            (3) in section 6 by striking ``$80,000'' from the last 
        sentence and inserting ``$2,000,000''.

            Passed the Senate October 5 (legislative day, September 
      22), 2000.

            Attest:

                                                    GARY SISCO,

                                                             Secretary.
```
Editorial Note on Part 900
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 900 appear at 67 FR 34602, May 15, 2002.

§ 900.100 May the Secretary elect to reacquire excess BIA or IHS property whose title has been transferred to an Indian tribe or tribal organization? Yes. When a self-determination contract or grant agreement, or portion—thereof, is retroceded, reassumed, terminated, or expires, the Secretary shall have the option to take title to any item of the property; ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section when a self-determination contract or grant agreement, or portion thereof, is retroceded, reassumed, terminated, or expires, the Secretary shall have the option to take title to any item of government-furnished property: ( 1 ) Whose title has been transferred to an Indian tribe or tribal organization;
( 2 ) That is still in use in the program; and
( 3 ) That has a current fair market value, less the cost of improvements borne by the Indian tribe or tribal organization, in excess of $5,000.
( b ) To the extent that any property referred to in paragraph (a) of this section is shared between one or more ongoing contracts or grant agreements and a contract or grant agreement that is retroceded, reassumed, terminated or expires and the Secretary wishes to use such property in the retroceded or reassumed program, the Secretary and the contractor or grantee using such property shall negotiate an acceptable arrangement for continued sharing of such property and for the retention or transfer of title.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-18-0000030 04-FEB-2019 07:58 AM
#### THE PEOPLE OF THE TERRITORY OF GUAM v. JOSEPH ATOIGUE AFLAGUE, Defendant

Criminal Case No. 200F-78

Superior Court of Guam

December 5, 1978

*585BENSON, *Acting Presiding Judge*

DECISION AND ORDER

This matter came before the Court on the People of the Territory of Guam’s motion for discovery pursuant to the Guam Code of Criminal Procedure, § 70.25(b), (c). The territory of Guam was represented by David Williams and defendant was represented by Howard Trapp. The motion was heard before the Honorable Richard H. Benson on November 29,1978, and decision was reserved.

Opposition to the motion is based on the People’s alleged failure to state the grounds upon which the motion is based pursuant to § 1.27 of the Guam Criminal Procedure Code. Section 1.27 was adopted from the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 47. The Advisory Committee note to Rule 47 states that it does not require the grounds for the motion to be stated “with particularity”. See 8B Moore’s Federal Practice — Criminal Rules, § 47.02 and Wright, Federal Practice and Procedure: Criminal, § 801. Therefore, the Court finds that the People’s citation to § 70.25 in its Points and Authorities adequately complies with § 1-27.

Secondly, defendant claims the privilege against self-incrimination under paragraphs (d) and (u) of § 1421(b) of Title 48 of the United States Code and the 5th and 14th Amendments of the United States Constitution. The Superior Court of Guam in *People v. Benavente,*1 Guam R. 525 (1978), and *People v. Unchangco,*1 Guam R. 525 (1978), held that § 70.25(b), (c) does not violate a defendant’s privilege against self-incrimination.

*586The People’s Motion for Discovery is therefore hereby GRANTED. The defendant is requested to furnish the required information in 5 days.

SO ORDERED.
### [§§2397 to 2397c. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–106, div. D, title XLIII, §4304(b)(1), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 664]

Section 2397, added Pub. L. 97–295, §1(29)(A), Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1291; amended Pub. L. 99–145, title IX, §922, Nov. 8, 1985, 99 Stat. 693; Pub. L. 100–26, §7(j)(5), (k)(2), Apr. 21, 1987, 101 Stat. 283, 284; Pub. L. 102–25, title VII, §701(d)(6), Apr. 6, 1991, 105 Stat. 114; Pub. L. 102–484, div. A, title X, §1052(29), Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2500; Pub. L. 103–355, title IV, §4401(d), title VIII, §8105(d), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3348, 3392, related to filing of certain reports by employees or former employees of defense contractors.

Section 2397a, added Pub. L. 99–145, title IX, §923(a)(1), Nov. 8, 1985, 99 Stat. 695; amended Pub. L. 100–26, §7(k)(2), Apr. 21, 1987, 101 Stat. 284; Pub. L. 101–280, §10(b), May 4, 1990, 104 Stat. 162, related to requirements relating to private employment contacts between certain Department of Defense procurement officials and defense contractors.

Section 2397b, added Pub. L. 99–500, §101(c) [title X, §931(a)(1)], Oct. 18, 1986, 100 Stat. 1783–82, 1783–156, and Pub. L. 99–591, §101(c) [title X, §931(a)(1)], Oct. 30, 1986, 100 Stat. 3341–82, 3341–156; Pub. L. 99–661, div. A, title IX, formerly title IV, §931(a)(1), Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3936, renumbered title IX, Pub. L. 100–26, §3(5), Apr. 21, 1987, 101 Stat. 273; amended Pub. L. 100–180, div. A, title VIII, §821, Dec. 4, 1987, 101 Stat. 1132; Pub. L. 103–355, title VIII, §8105(e), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3392, related to limitations on employment by contractors of certain former Department of Defense procurement officials.

Section 2397c, added Pub. L. 99–500, §101(c) [title X, §931(a)(1)], Oct. 18, 1986, 100 Stat. 1783–82, 1783–159, and Pub. L. 99–591, §101(c) [title X, §931(a)(1)], Oct. 30, 1986, 100 Stat. 3341–82, 3341–159; Pub. L. 99–661, div. A, title IX, formerly title IV, §931(a)(1), Nov. 14, 1986, 100 Stat. 3938, renumbered title IX, Pub. L. 100–26, §3(5), Apr. 21, 1987, 101 Stat. 273; amended Pub. L. 103–355, title VIII, §8105(f), Oct. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 3392, related to requirements for defense contractors concerning former Department of Defense officials.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

For effective date and applicability of repeal, see section 4401 of Pub. L. 104–106, set out as an Effective Date of 1996 Amendment note under section 2220 of this title.
### §1507a. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–31, §12(5), Aug. 6, 1981, 95 Stat. 154

Section, Pub. L. 91–469, §42(a), Oct. 21, 1970, 84 Stat. 1038, related to appointment, compensation, and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Maritime Affairs.
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender.

STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT 

USDA Seeks Applications to Spur Community and Economic Development in Rural 

Communities 

 WASHINGTON, March 4, 2020 – U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Deputy Under Secretary for 

Rural Development Bette Brand today announced that USDA is accepting Fiscal Year 2020 applications for 

grants to help strengthen the rural economy. 

 USDA is making grants available under the Rural Community Development Initiative program for qualified 

intermediaries to provide assistance to help improve housing and community facilities, and to implement 

community and economic development projects in rural areas. 

 Electronic applications must be submitted to grants.gov by May 13, 2020, at midnight EST. Paper 

applications must be submitted to the applicant’s USDA Rural Development state office by May 18, 2020 at 

4:00 p.m. local time. Additional information is available on page 12761 of the March 4, 2020, Federal Register. 

 USDA encourages applications that will support recommendations made in the Report to the President of the 

United States from the Task Force on Agriculture and Rural Prosperity (PDF, 5.4 MB) to help improve the 

quality of life in rural America. Applicants are encouraged to consider projects that provide measurable results 

in helping rural communities build robust and sustainable economies through strategic investments in 

infrastructure, partnerships and innovation. Key strategies include: 

• Achieving e-Connectivity for Rural America 

• Developing the Rural Economy 

• Harnessing Technological Innovation 

• Supporting a Rural Workforce 

• Improving Quality of Life 

USDA also encourages applications that will support the Administration’s goal to combat substance use 

disorder, including opioid misuse, in high-risk rural communities by strengthening the capacity to address 

prevention, treatment and/or recovery. 

#
### §184. Definitions

For purposes of this subchapter—

(1) the term "local unit of general purpose government" means the government of a county, municipality, township, Indian tribe, Alaskan native village, or other unit of government (other than a State) which is a unit of general government, and

(2) the term "State" includes the District of Columbia.

(Added Pub. L. 94–521, §8(a), Oct. 17, 1976, 90 Stat. 2463.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 17, 1976, see section 17 of Pub. L. 94–521, set out as a note under section 1 of this title.
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

Nos. 07 - 13 - 00234 - CR 07 - 13 - 00235 - CR 07 - 13 - 00236 - CR 07 - 13 - 00237 - CR 07 - 13 - 00238 - CR 07 - 13 - 00239 - CR AARON EDWARD BELL, A PPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE On Appeal from the 372nd District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court N os. 1288725D, 1288726D, 1288727 D, 1288728D, 1290870D, 1290871D

Honorable David Scott Wisch, Presiding 

### November 13 , 2013 ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. Aaron Edward Bell, appellant, appeals his convictions for aggravated assault. Appellant timely perfected his appeal. The clerk’s records were filed on July 30, 2013, and the reporter’s records on August 29, 2013. Appellant’s brief was due on September 30 , 2013. On October 8, 2013, appellant’s counsel was notified by letter that the brief2

was overdue and that unless appellant’s brief was filed on or before October 18, 2013, the appeal would be abated. On October 16, 2013, this court received a motion for extension of time to file the brief, which was granted to October 30, 2013. To date no brief or extension of time to file the brief has been filed. Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the 372nd District Court of Tarrant County (tria l court) for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court shall determine the following: 1. whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal; 2. whether appellant is indigent; 3. whether appellant has been denied the effective assistance of co unsel due to counsel’s failure to file a timely appellate brief; and, 4. why a timely appellate brief has not been filed on behalf of appellant. The trial court is also directed to enter such orders necessary to address the aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a supplemental record and cause that record to be filed with this court by December 13 , 2013. If it is determined that appellant is indigent and has been denied the effective assistance of counsel, the trial court may appoint him new counsel; the name, address and phone number of any new counsel appointed shall be included in the aforementioned f indings. Should further time be needed to perform these tasks, then same must be requested before December 13 , 2013. It is so ordered. Per Curiam Do not publish.
# C_2007092EN.01001201.xml

| 27.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 92/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 92/12

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

26 April 2007

(2007/C 92/13)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3596 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 162,26 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4507 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,68215 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1520 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6432 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 87,66 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1185 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5821 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,115 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 245,88 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6979 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,7744 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,3074 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 33,579 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8135 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6409 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5236 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,6343 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8405 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0597 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 263,00 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,5143 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,5047 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3743 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 345,17 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6505 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 64,268 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 35,0000 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,470 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3596

JPY

Japanese yen

162,26

DKK

Danish krone

7,4507

GBP

Pound sterling

0,68215

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1520

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6432

ISK

Iceland króna

87,66

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1185

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5821

CZK

Czech koruna

28,115

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

245,88

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6979

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,7744

RON

Romanian leu

3,3074

SKK

Slovak koruna

33,579

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8135

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6409

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5236

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,6343

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8405

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0597

KRW

South Korean won

1 263,00

ZAR

South African rand

9,5143

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,5047

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3743

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 345,17

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6505

PHP

Philippine peso

64,268

RUB

Russian rouble

35,0000

THB

Thai baht

44,470

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
IV

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 171

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with respect to the

National Conference of Law Enforcement Emerald Societies for their

services in honoring slain Detective John Michael Gibson and Private

First Class Jacob Chestnut of the United States Capitol Police.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 13, 1999

Ms. DELAURO submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with

respect to the National Conference of Law Enforcement

Emerald Societies for their services in honoring slain

Detective John Michael Gibson and Private First Class

Jacob Chestnut of the United States Capitol Police.

Whereas, within 48 hours of being called upon, the National

Conference of Law Enforcement Emerald Societies

brought together over 200 traditional pipers to perform

in honor of slain Detective John Michael Gibson and Private First Class Jacob Chestnut of the United States

Capitol Police;

Whereas the National Conference of Law Enforcement Emerald Societies arranged for the performance of the Prince

George’s Police and Ocean City Emerald Society
2

•HRES 171 IH

Pipebands from Maryland, the New Jersey State Police/

Blue and Gold Pipe and Drums, the Camden County

Pipe and Drums from New Jersey, the Irish Brigade

Cape Atlantic Pipeband, the Amtrak Police Pipeband,

and the Boston Gaelic Column Pipes and Drums at the

United States Capitol rotunda services in honor of Detective John Michael Gibson and Private First Class Jacob

Chestnut of the United States Capitol Police;

Whereas the National Conference of Law Enforcement Emerald Societies arranged for the performance of the Chicago

Police/Emerald Society Pipe and Drums, the New York

State Fraternal Order of Police War Pipes, and the

Hamilton County Sheriff’s Pipeband from Ohio at the funeral services of Detective John Michael Gibson of the

United States Capitol Police on July 30, 1998 and those

of Private First Class Jacob Chestnut of the United

States Capitol Police on July 31, 1998;

Whereas the National Conference of Law Enforcement Emerald Societies answered the call to honor their fallen

brothers, Detective John Michael Gibson and Private

First Class Jacob Chestnut of the United States Capitol

Police; and

Whereas the National Conference of Law Enforcement Emerald Societies fulfilled the wishes of the families of Detective John Michael Gibson and Private First Class Jacob

Chestnut of the United States Capitol Police to be Piped

Down: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives com2 mends the National Conference of Law Enforcement Em3 erald Societies for their distinguished services in honoring
3

•HRES 171 IH

1 the late Detective Michael Gibson and Private First Class

2 Jacob Chestnut of the United States Capitol Police.

Æ
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**


**SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of *Family
      Healthcare Solutions, Inc.* ,
      a
      Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on 10-QSB for the third quarterr ended
      June
      30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
      I, Teodoro
      F. Franco L. ,
      certify, pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350),
      that to my knowledge:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
      August 15, 2005






/s/Teodoro
        F. Franco L.
 Teodoro
          F. Franco L.
 Sole
          Officer/Director
#### § 51.21 Cooperation with States.

The Administrator has been delegated the authority to cooperate with the proper State authorities in the eradication of brucellosis and to pay indemnities for the destruction of brucellosis-reactor animals or brucellosis-exposed animals.