alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of ISG Resources,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, R Steve Creamer,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          1)   The Report full complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations of the Company.

/s/  R Steve Creamer

R Steve Creamer
Chief Executive Officer
August 5, 2002



<PAGE>
ELLEN MIHAICH, PH.D , DABT

ENVIRONMENTAL AND REGULATORY 

RESOURCES

Endocrine Policy Forum 

Comments on Guideline Changes
Prescriptive Guidelines

 No stakeholder review prior to publication

 Many guidelines are overly prescriptive

 More like a protocol than a guideline

 Test orders require strict adherence to guideline

 Consultation with Agency if need to deviate

 Protocol deviations common
Consultation with EPA

 Technical guidance meeting in 2010

 Flexibility on software, lab equipment

 Corrections to equations, concentrations, etc.

 “Corrections and Clarifications”

 Posted to EPA website

 Guidelines have not been formally updated
Standard Evaluation Procedures/

Study Profile Templates

 Many examples of inconsistencies between 

documents

 Uterotrophic SEP for both estrogen agonist and antagonist but 

only agonist is supported in guideline

 Inconsistent testosterone proprionate dose across 

TG/SET/DER for Hershberger

 Clarity important

 Contract research organizations/laboratories

 Agency contractors and reviewers
Charge Questions on Performance Criteria, Etc.

 Performance criteria should be re-evaluated

 32 performance criteria in male pubertal and all 15 studies 

evaluated had at least 2 out of acceptable range

 In the AMA, in 7 of the 18 screens, analytical concentration 

performance criteria were out of range

 All List 1 study data should be evaluated 

 2008 SAP recommended evaluation of 50-100 

 At most 21 were analyzed

 From a battery perspective, consistency across the pathways 

should be confirmed
Conclusion

 EPA should take the opportunity to amend the 

guidelines and other related documents before

issuing new test orders (List 2)

 Fix errors

 Make consistent

 Guideline instead of protocol

 Address Panel and stakeholder recommendations

 EPA should insure adequate stakeholder review of 

Tier 2 guidelines prior to finalizing and before 

requiring testing
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender.

STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Announces Awards to Help Socially-Disadvantaged Groups in Rural Areas

WASHINGTON, Nov. 7, 2019 – U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Deputy Under Secretary for Rural 

Development Donald “DJ” LaVoy today announced funding for organizations to provide technical assistance and 

training to socially-disadvantaged cooperatives in rural areas. Through the Socially-Disadvantaged Groups Grants

Program (SDGG), USDA is awarding a total of $3 million to 21 organizations in 15 states and the District of 

Columbia.

The awards announced today include the following:

• In Arizona, the Dine Community Development Corporation will use a $65,000 grant to prepare a feasibility 

study and business plan and provide strategic planning for an artists’ cooperative on the Navajo Nation 

Indian Reservation. The cooperative will include about 30 artists and emerging entrepreneurs. It will employ 

at least 15 individuals. 

• In South Carolina, United Farmers USA will use a $68,273 grant to provide training and technical assistance 

to socially-disadvantaged African American farm cooperative members in Clarendon, Lee and Williamsburg 

counties. These counties have a Median Household Income of $26,800. Farmers will be provided access to 

education, training and mentoring in areas such as farm management, record keeping, and specialty crop 

marketing. As many as 54 jobs will be saved and 60 small agricultural businesses will be assisted.

USDA defines a socially-disadvantaged group as one whose members have been subjected to racial, ethnic or gender 

prejudice because of their identity without regard to their individual qualities. Under the SDGG program, eligible 

grant recipients include cooperatives, groups of cooperatives and cooperative development centers that serve 

socially-disadvantaged groups. Examples of technical assistance include leadership training, and support to develop 

feasibility studies, business plans and strategic plans. Recipients can be based in any area, but the businesses or 

organizations they serve must be in an eligible rural area. 

#
Stakeholder Announcement

USDA Seeks Comment on Ways to Expand Access to Capital for Rural Small 

Businesses 

(November 9, 2016) – United States Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Rural Development 

Under Secretary Lisa Mensah announced today that USDA is seeking public comments on the 

current rules governing the Rural Business Investment Program. The Department would like to 

identify additional ways to streamline the program’s regulations and expand access to capital for 

small rural businesses. 

The Department is hosting a webinar on November 17, and would like to obtain comments on 

how the Rural Business Investment Program can be modified to help provide equity for rural 

businesses. 

The webinar will be streamed live. To participate, click on this link: 

https://cc.readytalk.com/r/gpu22rmqt4rz&eom

Participants are encouraged to use the audio on their computers. Participants without computer 

access should call (toll-free in the U.S. and Canada) (855) 237-0520, ID/Passcode: 96977771. 

The webinar starts at 12:00 p.m. Eastern Time.
§ 309.7 Livestock affected with anthrax; cleaning and disinfection of infected livestock pens and driveways. ( a ) Any livestock found on ante-mortem inspection to be affected with anthrax shall be identified as U.S. Condemned and disposed of in accordance with § 309.13.
( b ) No other livestock of a lot in which anthrax is found on ante-mortem inspection shall be slaughtered and presented for post-mortem inspection until it has been determined by a careful ante-mortem inspection that no anthrax infected livestock remains in the lot.
( c ) Apparently healthy livestock (other than hogs) from a lot in which anthrax is detected, and any apparently healthy livestock which have been treated with anthrax biologicals which do not contain living anthrax organisms, may be slaughtered and presented for post-mortem inspection if they have been held not less than 21 days following the last treatment or the last death of any livestock in the lot. Alternatively, if desired, all apparently healthy livestock of the lot may be segregated and held for treatment by a State licensed veterinarian under supervision of a Program employee or other official designated by the area supervisor. No anthrax vaccine (live organisms) shall be used on the premises of an official establishment.
( d ) Livestock which have been injected with anthrax vaccines (live organisms) within 6 weeks, and those bearing evidence of reaction to such treatment, such as inflammation, tumefaction, or edema at the site of the injection, shall be condemned on ante-mortem inspection, or such animals may be held under supervision of a Program employee or other official designated by the area supervisor until the expiration of the 6-week period and the disappearance of any evidence of reaction to the treatment.
( e ) When livestock are found on ante-mortem inspection to be affected with anthrax, all exposed livestock pens and driveways of the official establishment shall be cleaned and disinfected by promptly and thoroughly removing and burning all straw, litter, and manure. This shall be followed immediately by a thorough disinfection of the exposed premises by soaking the ground, fences, gates, and all exposed material with a 5 percent solution of sodium hydroxide or commercial lye prepared as outlined in § 310.9(e)(1) of this subchapter, or other disinfectant that may be approved in specific cases by the Administrator specifically for this purpose.
### §225a. Maintenance of long run growth of monetary and credit aggregates

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal Open Market Committee shall maintain long run growth of the monetary and credit aggregates commensurate with the economy's long run potential to increase production, so as to promote effectively the goals of maximum employment, stable prices, and moderate long-term interest rates.

(Dec. 23, 1913, ch. 6, §2A, as added Pub. L. 95–188, title II, §202, Nov. 16, 1977, 91 Stat. 1387; amended Pub. L. 95–523, title I, §108(a), Oct. 27, 1978, 92 Stat. 1897; Pub. L. 100–418, title III, §3005(c), Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1375; Pub. L. 106–569, title X, §1003(a), Dec. 27, 2000, 114 Stat. 3028.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Another section 202 of Pub. L. 95–188 amended section 302 of this title.

#### Amendments

2000—Pub. L. 106–569 struck out provisions after first sentence relating to annual reports to Congress, transmittal of reports to Congressional Committees, consultations with Committees, report of Committee, changing conditions affecting achievement of objectives and plans, and explanation for deviations from objectives and plans.

1988—Pub. L. 100–418 inserted ", including an analysis of the impact of the exchange rate of the dollar on those trends" after "the Nation" in cl. (1).

1978—Pub. L. 95–523 substituted provisions relating to independent written reports of the Board of Governors to the Congress for provisions relating to the consultations of the Board of Governors with Congress at semi-annual hearings, substituted "the objectives and plans with respect to the ranges" for "such ranges", inserted "of the monetary and credit aggregates disclosed in the reports submitted under this section" after "growth or diminution", and inserted proviso respecting the inclusion of an explanation of reasons for revisions or deviations in subsequent consultations and reports.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1978 Amendment

Pub. L. 95–523, title I, §108(b), Oct. 27, 1978, 92 Stat. 1898, provided that: "The amendment made by subsection (a) [amending this section] takes effect on January 1, 1979."
§ 311.10 Anaplasmosis, anthrax, babesiosis, bacillary hemoglobinuria in cattle, blackleg, bluetongue, hemorrhagic septicemia, icterohematuria in sheep, infectious bovine rhinotracheitis, leptospirosis, malignant epizootic catarrh, strangles, purpura hemorrhagica, azoturia, infectious equine encephalomyelitis, toxic encephalomyelitis (forage poisoning), infectious anemia (swamp fever), dourine, acute influenza, generalized osteoporosis, glanders (farcy), acute inflammatory lameness, extensive fistula, and unhealed vaccine lesions. ( a ) Carcasses of livestock affected with or showing lesions of any of the following named diseases or conditions shall be condemned: ( 1 ) Anthrax.
( 2 ) Blackleg.
( 3 ) Unhealed vaccine lesions (vaccinia).
( 4 ) Strangles.
( 5 ) Purpura hemorrhagica.
( 6 ) Azoturia.
( 7 ) Infectious equine encephalomye-litis.
( 8 ) Toxic encephalomyelitis (forage poisoning).
( 9 ) Infectious anemia (swamp fever).
( 10 ) Dourine.
( 11 ) Acute influenza.
( 12 ) Generalized osteoporosis.
( 13 ) Glanders (farcy).
( 14 ) Acute inflammatory lameness.
( 15 ) Extensive fistula.
( b ) Carcasses of livestock affected with or showing lesions of any of the following named diseases or conditions shall be condemned, except when recovery has occurred to the extent that only localized lesions persist, in which case the carcass may be passed for human food after removal and condemnation of the affected organs or other parts: ( 1 ) Anaplasmosis.
( 2 ) Bacillary hemoglobinuria in cattle.
( 3 ) Babesiosis (piroplasmosis).
( 4 ) Bluetongue.
( 5 ) Hemorrhagic septicemia.
( 6 ) Icterohematuria in sheep.
( 7 ) Infectious bovine rhinotracheitis.
( 8 ) Leptospirosis.
( 9 ) Malignant epizootic catarrh.
[35 FR 15569, Oct. 3, 1970, as amended at 36 FR 12004, June 24, 1971]
### [§§2531 to 2534. Repealed. Pub. L. 117–263, div. K, title CXVIII, §11808(a)(18), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 4166]

Section 2531, act Aug. 4, 1949, ch. 393, 63 Stat. 526, §432; Aug. 9, 1955, ch. 650, §§1, 2, 69 Stat. 577; Pub. L. 86–309, Sept. 21, 1959, 73 Stat. 585; Pub. L. 91–278, §1(10), June 12, 1970, 84 Stat. 305; Pub. L. 96–23, §5(a), June 13, 1979, 93 Stat. 68; Pub. L. 97–295, §2(11), (13), Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1302; Pub. L. 98–557, §15(a)(3)(B), Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 2865; Pub. L. 99–640, §10(a)(7), Nov. 10, 1986, 100 Stat. 3549; renumbered §2531, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §114(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4223; Pub. L. 116–283, div. G, title LVXXXV [LXXXV], §8505(a)(21), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4748, related to personnel of former Lighthouse Service.

Section 2532, added Pub. L. 116–283, div. G, title LVXXXV [LXXXV], §8510(b), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4757, related to retirement of certain employees of former Lighthouse Service.

Section 2533, added Pub. L. 116–283, div. G, title LVXXXV [LXXXV], §8511(a), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4758, related to surviving spouses of current or former employees of Lighthouse Service.

Section 2534, added and amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. G, title LVXXXV [LXXXV], §8511(b), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4758, related to application for section 2533 benefits.
OFFICE\OFFICE\html.dot">

Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Vermont Teddy Bear Company, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Elisabeth B. Robert, President and Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d); and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: September 30, 2002



/s/ Elisabeth B. Robert

Elisabeth B. Robert

President and Chief Executive Officer

Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
S. 1367

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

An Act

To amend the Act which established the Saint-Gaudens National Historic Site,

in the State of New Hampshire, by modifying the boundary and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled, That Public

Law 88–543 (16 U.S.C. 461 (note)), which established SaintGaudens National Historic Site is amended—

(1) in section 3 by striking ‘‘not to exceed sixty-four acres

of lands and interests therein’’ and inserting ‘‘279 acres of

lands and buildings, or interests therein’’;

(2) in section 6 by striking ‘‘$2,677,000’’ from the first

sentence and inserting ‘‘$10,632,000’’; and

(3) in section 6 by striking ‘‘$80,000’’ from the last sentence

and inserting ‘‘$2,000,000’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>       THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
               EXTRACTED FROM THE RAKO CORPORATION FINANCIAL
               STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS
               QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
               FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>   1

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,500
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,025
<OTHER-SE>                                      95,861
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,715
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,715)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,715)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,715)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)


</TABLE>
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 502 

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to require disclosure to 

States of the basis of determinations under such Act, to ensure use 

of information provided by State, Tribal, and county governments in 

decision-making under such Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2019 

Mr. ENZI (for himself, Mr. ROBERTS, and Mr. RISCH) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to require 

disclosure to States of the basis of determinations under 

such Act, to ensure use of information provided by State, 

Tribal, and county governments in decision-making under 

such Act, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State, Tribal, and 

5 Local Species Transparency and Recovery Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 502 IS

1 SEC. 2. REQUIRING DECISIONAL TRANSPARENCY WITH AF2 FECTED STATES. 

3 Section 6(a) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 

4 (16 U.S.C. 1535(a)) is amended— 

5 (1) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ before the first sentence; 

6 and 

7 (2) by striking ‘‘Such cooperation shall include’’ 

8 and inserting the following: 

9 ‘‘(2) Such cooperation shall include— 

10 ‘‘(A) before making a determination under sec11 tion 4(a), providing to States affected by such deter12 mination all data that is the basis of the determina13 tion; and 

14 ‘‘(B)’’. 

15 SEC. 3. ENSURING USE OF STATE, TRIBAL, AND LOCAL IN16 FORMATION. 

17 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3 of the Endangered Spe18 cies Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1532) is amended— 

19 (1) by redesignating paragraphs (2) through 

20 (21) as paragraphs (3) through (22), respectively; 

21 and 

22 (2) by inserting after paragraph (1) the fol23 lowing: 

24 ‘‘(2) The term ‘best scientific and commercial data 

25 available’ includes all such data submitted by a State, 

26 Tribal, or county government.’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•S 502 IS

1 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 7(n) of 

2 such Act (16 U.S.C. 1536(n)) is amended by striking 

3 ‘‘section 3(13)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 3(14)’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
# C_2007096EN.01002701.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/27

---

Order of the Court of 20 March 2007 — Galileo International Technology LLC, Galileo International LLC, Galileo Belgium SA, Galileo Danmark A/S, Galileo Deutschland GmbH, Galileo España SA, Galileo France SARL, Galileo Nederland BV, Galileo Nordiska AB, Galileo Portugal Ltd, Galileo Sigma Srl, Galileo International Ltd, The Galileo Company, Timas Ltd (trading as Galileo Ireland) v Commission of the European Communities

(Case C-325/06 P) (1)

1

(Appeals - Community project for a satellite navigation system (GALILEO) - Harm suffered by the proprietors of trade marks and business names containing the word Galileo - Appeal partly manifestly admissible and partly manifestly unfounded)

(2007/C 96/47)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Galileo International Technology LLC, Galileo International LLC, Galileo Belgium SA, Galileo Danmark A/S, Galileo Deutschland GmbH, Galileo España SA, Galileo France SARL, Galileo Nederland BV, Galileo Nordiska AB, Galileo Portugal Ltd, Galileo Sigma Srl, (represented by: J.-N. Louis and C. Delcorde)

Applicants:

Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Huttunen and W. Wils, as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 May 2006 in Case T-279/03 Galileo International Technology and Others v Commission by which the Court dismissed an application seeking, first, an order that the Commission cease to use the term Galileo in relation to the Community project for a global satellite navigation system and to encourage others to use that term, and, second, for compensation for the loss allegedly suffered by the applicants on account of the use and promotion of that term by the Commission, which they claimed to be identical to trade marks registered by them and to their business names

Galileo International Technology and Others

Commission

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Galileo International Technology LLC, Galileo International LLC, Galileo Belgium SA, Galileo Danmark A/S, Galileo Deutschland GmbH, Galileo España SA, Galileo France SARL, Galileo Nederland BV, Galileo Nordiska AB, Galileo Portugal Ltd, Galileo Sigma Srl, Galileo International Ltd, The Galileo Co. and Timas Ltd are ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Galileo International Technology LLC, Galileo International LLC, Galileo Belgium SA, Galileo Danmark A/S, Galileo Deutschland GmbH, Galileo España SA, Galileo France SARL, Galileo Nederland BV, Galileo Nordiska AB, Galileo Portugal Ltd, Galileo Sigma Srl, Galileo International Ltd, The Galileo Co. and Timas Ltd are ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 224, 16.9.2006.

1

---
#### DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION v. SEABOARD SYSTEM RAILROAD

No. 37PA90

Case below: 96 N.C.App. 679

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 allowed 5 April 1990.