alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alliance Laundry Systems LLC, Alliance Laundry Corporation and Alliance Laundry Holdings LLC
(the Companies) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas F. LEsperance, Chief Executive Officer of the
Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ THOMAS F. LESPERANCE
|Chief Executive Officer  

May 10, 2010
Exhibit 23.1





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-152287, 333-137217, 333-125139, 333-111253, 333-97891, 333-67790, 333-93407, 333-93413, 333-69761, 333-69765, 333-39189, 333-39213 and 333-30771) of Vital Images, Inc. of our report dated March 14, 2011 relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.





/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Minneapolis, Minnesota


March 14, 2011
§ 381.72 Segregation of suspects on ante mortem inspection. ( a ) All birds, except ratites, that on ante mortem inspection do not plainly show, but are suspected of being affected with, any disease or condition that under §§ 381.80 to 381.93 of this Part may cause condemnation in whole or in part on post mortem inspection, shall be segregated from the other poultry and held for separate slaughter, evisceration, and post mortem inspection. The inspector shall be notified when such segregated lots are presented for post mortem inspection, and inspection of such birds shall be conducted separately. Such procedure for the correlation of ante mortem and post mortem findings by the inspector, as may be prescribed or approved by the Administrator, shall be carried out.
( b ) All ratites showing symptoms of disease will be segregated, individually tagged as “U.S. Suspects” by establishment personnel under FSIS supervision with a serially numbered metal or plastic leg band or tag bearing the term “U.S. Suspect,” and held for further examination by an FSIS veterinarian. Depending upon the findings of the veterinarian's examination, these birds will either be passed for regular slaughter, slaughtered as suspects, withheld from slaughter, or condemned on ante mortem. Those ratites affected with conditions that would be readily detected on post mortem inspection need not be individually tagged on ante mortem inspection with the “U.S. Suspect” tag provided that such ratites are segregated and otherwise handled as “U.S. Suspects.” All ratites identified as “U.S. Condemned” shall be tagged by establishment personnel, under FSIS supervision, with a serially numbered metal or plastic leg band or tag bearing the term “U.S. Condemned.”
[66 FR 22906, May 7, 2001]
### **CHAPTER 49—FIRE PREVENTION AND CONTROL**

Sec.
2201.
Congressional findings.
2202.
Declaration of purpose.
2203.
Definitions.
2204.
United States Fire Administration.
2205.
Public education.
2206.
National Academy for Fire Prevention and Control.
2207.
Fire technology.
2208.
National Fire Data Center.
2209.
Master plans.
2210.
Reimbursement for costs of firefighting on Federal property.
2211.
Review of fire prevention codes.
2212.
Fire safety effectiveness statements.
2213.
Annual conference.
2214.
Public safety awards.
2215.
Reports to Congress and President.
2216.
Authorization of appropriations.
2217.
Public access to information.
2218.
Administrative provisions.
2219.
Assistance to Consumer Product Safety Commission.
2220.
Arson prevention, detection, and control.
2221.
Arson prevention grants.
2222, 2223. Repealed.
2223a.
Review.
2223b.
Working group.
2223c.
Report and recommendations.
2223d.
Annual revision of recommendations.
2223e.
"Emergency response personnel" defined.
2224.
Listings of places of public accommodation.
2225.
Fire prevention and control guidelines for places of public accommodation.
2225a.
Prohibiting Federal funding of conferences held at non-certified places of public accommodation.
2226.
Dissemination of fire prevention and control information.
2227.
Fire safety systems in federally assisted buildings.
2228.
CPR training.
2229.
Firefighter assistance.
2229a.
Staffing for adequate fire and emergency response.
2230.
Surplus and excess Federal equipment.
2231.
Cooperative agreements with Federal facilities.
2232.
Burn research.
2233.
Removal of civil liability barriers that discourage the donation of fire equipment to volunteer fire companies.
2234.
Encouraging adoption of standards for firefighter health and safety.
2235.
Investigation authorities.
#### Andrew Fuller, Respondent, v Ryder Truck Rental, Inc., Appellant.

[824 NYS2d 854]

*1326Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Thomas J. Murphy, J.), entered January 31, 2006 in a personal injury action. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied in part defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for injuries he allegedly sustained when he slipped while climbing into the back of a refrigeration truck and fell from the truck. The truck was owned by defendant and leased to plaintiffs employer. Defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and Supreme Court granted only that part of defendant’s motion with respect to the breach of express warranty claim. We reject defendant’s contention that the court should have granted the motion in its entirety. We note at the outset that defendant, as the movant, “must affirmatively establish the merits of its . . . defense[s] and [can]not meet its burden by noting gaps in its opponent’s proof’ *(Orcutt v American Linen Supply Co.,*212 AD2d 979, 980 [1995]).

With respect to the negligence cause of action, the record establishes that defendant entered into an exclusive and comprehensive maintenance contract for the truck, and thus defendant assumed a duty to act with reasonable care toward the driver of the truck *(see generally Polka v Servicemaster Mgt. Servs. Corp.,*83 NY2d 579, 584-587 [1994]). Defendant failed to meet its initial burden of establishing, inter alia, that the allegedly dangerous condition was not visible and apparent or that it had not existed for a sufficient length of time before the accident to permit defendant to discover and remedy it *(see Librandi v Stop & Shop Food Stores, Inc.,*7 AD3d 679, 679-680 [2004]; *Pelow v Tri-Main Dev.,*303 AD2d 940, 940-941 [2003]). With respect to the strict products liability cause of action, defendant failed to meet its burden of establishing that there are *1327normal circumstances of use in which the truck would not be unreasonably dangerous without the optional safety features that allegedly were required *(see Beemer v Deere & Co.,*17 AD3d 1097, 1098 [2005]; *see generally Scarangella v Thomas Built Buses,*93 NY2d 655, 661 [1999]). Finally, defendant does not address on appeal the court’s denial of that part of its motion with respect to the breach of implied warranty claim and thus is deemed to have abandoned any contention with respect thereto *(see generally Ciesinski v Town of Aurora,*202 AD2d 984 [1994]).

We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and conclude that they are without merit. Present—Kehoe, J.P., Martoche, Smith and Pine, JJ.
### §4224. Ineligibility to file valid declarations

#### (a) In general

A declaration filed pursuant to section 4221 of this title and in accordance with sections 4222 and 4223 of this title is valid unless—

(1) the declaration is filed by a current or former officer or employee of a Federal or State government agency or instrumentality who discovered or gathered the information in the declaration, in whole or in part, while acting within the course of the declarant's government employment;

(2) the declaration is filed by a person who knowingly participated in the violation of section 1517 of title 18 or any of the sections of title 18 referred to in section 4201 1 of this title, or any other fraudulent conduct with respect to which the declaration is made;

(3) the declaration is filed by an institution-affiliated party (as defined in section 1813(u) of this title) who withheld information during the course of any bank examination or investigation authorized pursuant to section 1820 of this title which such party owed a fiduciary duty to disclose;

(4) the declaration is filed by a member of the immediate family of the individual whose activities are the subject of the declaration or where, in the discretion of the Attorney General, it appears the individual could benefit from the award; or

(5) the declaration identifies an asset or assets the nature, location, or possible recovery of which has been disclosed to a member of the public in a criminal, civil, or administrative proceeding, in a congressional, administrative, or Government Accountability Office report, hearing, audit or investigation, by any other government source, or by the news media, unless the person providing the declaration is the original source of the information.

#### (b) "Original source" defined

For the purposes of subsection (a)(5), the term "original source" means a person who has direct and independent knowledge of the information contained in the declaration and who voluntarily provided the information to the government prior to the disclosure.

#### (c) Notice of invalidity

If the Attorney General determines at any time that a declaration is invalid under this section, that a declaration fails to meet the requirements of section 4222 of this title, or that a declaration has been disclosed in violation of section 4223 of this title, the Attorney General shall notify the person who filed the declaration in writing that the declaration is invalid, and the declarant shall not enjoy any of the rights of the declarant listed in section 4225 or 4226 of this title.

(Pub. L. 101–647, title XXV, §2579, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4900; Pub. L. 108–271, §8(b), July 7, 2004, 118 Stat. 814.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2004—Subsec. (a)(5). Pub. L. 108–271 substituted "Government Accountability Office" for "General Accounting Office".

1 So in original. Probably should be section "1833a(c)".
### SUBCHAPTER II—NATIONAL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RESEARCH INSTITUTES
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 31.01

Certification of CEO Pursuant to
Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)

I, N. Damodar Reddy, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Alliance Semiconductor
Corporation;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      a)    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
      being prepared;

      b)    [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release 33-8238];

      c)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
      and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      d)    disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
      most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
      likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting; and

5.    The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      a)    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
      or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

      b)    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
      other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting.

/s/ N. Damodar Reddy
N. Damodar Reddy
Chairman of the Board, President, and
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
June 10, 2004
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Seeks Applications for Technical Assistance to Expand Access to Safe,

Affordable and Equitable Housing for Farmworkers

WASHINGTON, Jan. 20, 2022 – U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Under Secretary for Rural 

Development Xochitl Torres Small today announced that the Department is inviting applications for technical 

assistance grants to help organizations apply for funding to develop decent, safe, affordable and equitable

housing for year-round and migrant or seasonal domestic farmworkers.

The Department is offering priority points to applications for projects that advance key priorities under the 

Biden-Harris Administration: in particular, projects that will help communities recover from the COVID-19 

pandemic, advance equity and combat climate change. These extra points will increase the likelihood of funding 

for projects seeking to address these critical challenges facing people living in rural America.

USDA will make $1 million in grants available for eligible nonprofits through the Off-Farm Labor Housing 

Technical Assistance Grant Program. These nonprofits may use the funds to provide technical expertise, 

information, and services to help organizations complete USDA loan and grant applications to develop decent, 

safe, affordable, and equitable housing for farmworkers.

Electronic applications must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on March 21, 2022. For 

additional information on how to apply, see page 3071 of the Jan. 20, 2022, Federal Register or Grants.gov.

USDA Rural Development provides loans and grants to help expand economic opportunities and create jobs in 

rural areas. This assistance supports infrastructure improvements; business development; housing; community 

facilities such as schools, public safety and health care; and high-speed internet access in rural areas. For more 

information, visit www.rd.usda.gov.

If you’d like to subscribe to USDA Rural Development updates, visit our GovDelivery subscriber page.

#

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender.
§ 351.20 Withdrawal of service from certified plants. ( a ) After opportunity for hearing has been accorded the operator of a certified plant, the certification service, provided for in this part, may be withdrawn from such plant in accordance with the applicable rules of practice, if it is determined that: ( 1 ) The operator, or his employee or agent: ( i ) Has made any willful misrepresentation or engaged in any fraudulent or deceptive practice in connection with the service;
( ii ) Has interfered with or obstructed any Program employee or other inspector in the performance of his duties, under the regulations in this part, by intimidation, threats, or other improper means; or
( iii ) Has violated section 203(h) of the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946, as amended (7 U.S.C. 1622(h)), or any regulation in this part; or
( 2 ) Facilities or procedures at the certified plant do not conform to the arrangements approved by the Administrator under § 351.5.
( b ) Pending final determination of the matter, the Administrator may summarily suspend the certification service at any certified plant when he has reason to believe that there is cause for withdrawal of the service under paragraph (a). The operator of the certified plant shall be notified of the Administrator's decision to suspend summarily the certification service at such plant and the reasons therefor, in writing, in the manner prescribed in § 1.147(b) of the rules of practice (7 CFR 1.147(b)), or orally. The Administrator's decision to suspend summarily the certification service shall be effective upon such oral or written notification, whichever is earlier, to the operator of the certified plant. If such notification is oral, the Administrator shall confirm such decision, and the reasons therefor, in writing, as promptly as circumstances permit, and such written confirmation shall be served upon the operator of the certified plant, in the manner prescribed in § 1.147(b) of the rules of practice (7 CFR 1.147(b)).
( c ) The rules of practice of the Department of Agriculture in subpart H of part I, subtitle A, title 7 of the Code of Federal Regulations, are the rules of practice applicable to adjudicatory, administrative proceedings under the regulations in this part (9 CFR part 351).
[40 FR 58627, Dec. 18, 1975, as amended at 43 FR 11148, Mar. 17, 1978]
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement
(No. 333-63781) on Form S-8 of Merrill Merchants Bancshares, Inc. of our report
dated January 11, 1999, relating to the consolidated statements of financial
condition of Merrill Merchants Bancshares, Inc. and Subsidiary as of December
31, 1998 and 1997 and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in
shareholders' equity and cash flows for the years then ended, which report is
included in the December 31, 1998 annual report on Form 10-KSB of Merrill
Merchants Bancshares, Inc.

Bangor, Maine
March 24, 1999

                                            /s/ Berry, Dunn, McNeil & Parker
### **CHAPTER 13—TEXTILE FOUNDATION**

Sec.
501.
Creation of body corporate; directors; principal office; agencies.
502.
Board of directors of Textile Foundation.
503.
Purpose of Foundation.
504.
Powers of Foundation.
505.
Report to Congress.
506.
Amendment and repeal of chapter.
#### § 115.72 Evidentiary standard for administrative investigations.

When an administrative investigation is undertaken, the agency shall impose no standard higher than a preponderance of the evidence in determining whether allegations of sexual abuse are substantiated.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Rural Utilities Service 

RUS BULLETIN 1780-18 

RD-GD-2020-107

SUBJECT: Daily Inspection Report

TO: RUS Water and Environmental Programs Staff.

EFFECTIVE DATE: Date of approval.

OFFICE OF PRIMARY INTEREST: Water and Environmental Programs. 

AVAILABILITY: This Bulletin is available on the Internet at 

http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/RDU_Bulletins_Water_and_Environmental.html 

PURPOSE: Daily inspector report conducted by an inspector and submitted 

to borrowers.

DISCLAIMER: The contents of this guidance document does not have the force and effect of law and is 

not meant to bind the public in any way. This document is intended only to provide 

clarity to the public regarding existing requirements under the law or agency policies. 
RUS Bulletin 1780-18

DAILY INSPECTION REPORT

Job No. (1)

Borrower Information

Date

Name

Report No. (2) 

Street County State Zip

Project Information

Type of Project Project Location

Contractor(s) Name Superintendent 

Weather Conditions 

Description of Work Accomplished
Items of Interest Occurred

Delays or Work Restraining Orders

Change Orders

Additional Remarks 

(Include problems, delays and controversies on orders)

BY

Resident Inspector

Note to Resident Inspector:

The original Daily Inspection Report shall be submitted to the borrower at intervals not exceeding one (1) week 

with copies of the report furnished the project engineer, Contractor(s), and RUS.

(1) Assigned by RUS.

(2) Assigned by Resident Inspector in consecutive order beginning with No. 1.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 21

                   SUBSIDIARIES OF REGENT COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                Name of Subsidiary                       State of Incorporation
                ------------------                       ----------------------


<S>                                                      <C>
            Regent Broadcasting Midwest, Inc.                    Delaware
            Regent Broadcasting West Coast, Inc.                 California
            Regent Broadcasting of Chico, Inc.                   Delaware
            Regent Broadcasting of Flagstaff, Inc.               Delaware
            Regent Broadcasting of Flint, Inc.                   Delaware
            Regent Broadcasting of Kingman, Inc.                 Delaware
            Regent Broadcasting of Lake Tahoe, Inc.              Delaware
            Regent Broadcasting of Lexington, Inc.               Delaware
            Regent Broadcasting of Mansfield, Inc.               Delaware
            Regent Broadcasting of Palmdale, Inc.                Delaware
            Regent Broadcasting of Redding, Inc.                 Delaware
            Regent Broadcasting of San Diego, Inc.               Delaware
            Regent Broadcasting of South Carolina, Inc.          Delaware
            Regent Broadcasting of St. Cloud, Inc.               Delaware
            Regent Broadcasting of Victorville, Inc.             Delaware
            Regent Licensee of Chico, Inc.                       Delaware
            Regent Licensee of Flagstaff, Inc.                   Delaware
            Regent Licensee of Flint, Inc.                       Delaware
            Regent Licensee of Kingman, Inc.                     Delaware
            Regent Licensee of Lake Tahoe, Inc.                  Delaware
            Regent Licensee of Lexington, Inc.                   Delaware
            Regent Licensee of Mansfield, Inc.                   Delaware
            Regent Licensee of Palmdale, Inc.                    Delaware
            Regent Licensee of Redding, Inc.                     Delaware
            Regent Licensee of San Diego, Inc.                   Delaware
            Regent Licensee of South Carolina, Inc               Delaware
            Regent Licensee of St. Cloud, Inc.                   Delaware
            Regent Licensee of Victorville, Inc.                 Delaware
</TABLE>
#### § 325.12 [Reserved]