alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
 TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the annual report on Form 40-F of FirstService Corporation (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Jay S. Hennick, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
 
 1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated: March 1, 2010
  /s/ Jay S. Hennick
 Jay S. Hennick
 Chief Executive Officer
 
 
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
 TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the annual report on Form 40-F of FirstService Corporation (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, John B. Friedrichsen, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
 
 1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated: March 1, 2010
  /s/ John B. Friedrichsen
 John B. Friedrichsen
 Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION SIGN FOR

RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS

Sponsor / Developer

Architect or Engineer

(second line)

(second line)

Contractor

Financed by United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Rural Development

Project Title

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

SIGN DIMENSIONS : 1200 mm x 2400 mm x 19 mm (approx. 4’ x 8’ x 3⁄4”)

PLYWOOD PANEL (APA RATED A-B GRADE–EXTERIOR)

White Background

Black Lettering

Black 

Lettering Lettering

(Blue, PMS 288)

RD Signature

(Blue, PMS 288)

Recommended Fonts: Helvetica or Arial

Official(s) or Sponsor Address

Joseph R. Biden, President of the United States

Thomas J. Vilsack Secretary of Agriculture
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Complaintant, 

### v. FAA DocketNo. 2014-0685 Judge J.E. Sullivan
SMYRNA AIR CENTER Respondent

REPORT OF PRIVATE PRIVATE CONFERENCE PURSUANT TOTHIS COURTS ORDER

OF OCTOBER 29, 2014 AND NOTICE OF INTENT TOWITHDRAW THE MOTION TO DISMISS
Comes now the Respondent, and would state to the Court as follows: 1. Onor about October 29, 2014, this Court ordered the parties to engage in a private conversationto discuss a briefing schedule to address Respondent's Motion to Dismiss. 2. Following this private conversation and after a careful review ofthe law and facts in this case, respondent respectiully withdraws its Motionto Dismiss at this time.

**···························~···········································································** Respectfully submitted onthe

# JL day ofNovember, 2014. 

# RECEIVE[) NOV 18 2014 

## HEARING DOCKETRespectfhlly submitted, MINK & DUKE, PLLC

Thomas F. Mink, II, BPR#0 o067 Charles M. Duke, BPR# 23607 William M. Leech, III, BPR# 30515 P.O. Box 198742 Nashville, Tennessee 37219-8742 (615) 256-0138 (615) 730-5997 Fax tmink@minkdukelaw.com mduke@minkdukelaw.com wleech@minkdukelaw.comCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned ce1tities that the foregoing motion was sent via U.S. Mail and electronic mail to the following: Mr. Ryan M. Landers, Complaint's Counsel Federal Aviation Administration, Office ofRegional Com1sel, AS0-7 Southem Region 1701 ColumbiaAvenue College Park, GA 30337 Hon. J.E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E-11-310) Washington, DC 20590 Federal Aviation Administration AttentionHearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 WilburWright Building--suite 2W 1000 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 On the

# jJ_ day ofNovember, 2014.

Charles M. Duke William M. Leech, III
**Exhibit
      32.2**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Power3 Medical Products, Inc (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period  ended
      June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof (the “Report”), I, Marion J. McCormick, Chief Accounting Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section  1350
      of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the SecuritiesExchange
                Act of 1934; and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section  1350
      and
      is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act
      of
      1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing
      of
      the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any
      general incorporation language in such filing.





Dated:   August
                14, 2008
            By:
            /s/    
                Marion J. McCormickMarion
                J. McCormick
              Chief
                Accounting Officer
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender.

STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

Adcock Named Administrator of USDA Rural Business-Cooperative Service

WASHINGTON, July 15, 2020 – U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Rural Development Deputy Under 

Secretary Bette Brand today named Rebeckah Freeman Adcock Administrator of the Rural BusinessCooperative Service. 

Before being appointed to this role, Adcock served as a Senior Advisor to Secretary of Agriculture Sonny 

Perdue. In 2017, the Secretary designated Adcock as USDA’s Regulatory Reform and Policy Officer, where she 

led the effort to ease the burden of overregulation and ensure that regulatory actions are properly prioritized and 

implemented. 

Adcock directly advised the Secretary and led internal coordination on issues relating to homeland security, 

operational continuity and emergency/disaster response, including serving as chair of USDA’s Multi-Agency 

Coordination (MAC) group. Adcock served as the Manager of the President’s Task Force on Agriculture and 

Rural Prosperity and continues to advise the Secretary on policy relating to interagency coordination.

Before joining USDA, Adcock served as a senior policy director for various agricultural organizations and as 

Counsel on the United States Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works for Sen. Jim Inhofe.

Adcock will begin her new role on July 20. USDA Rural Development encourages partners and stakeholder 

groups to reach out to Rebeckah in her new role to build on existing partnerships and create new ones.

#
# C_2014151EN.01001701.xml

| 19.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 151/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 151/17

---

Judgment of the General Court of 28 March 2014 — Italy v Commission

(Case T-117/10) (1)

1

((ERDF - Reduction of financial assistance - 2000 - 2006 regional operational programme for the region of Apulia (Italy) covered by objective No 1 - Serious failings in the management or control systems which could lead to systemic irregularities - Partnership principle - Proportionality - Article 39(3)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 - Articles 4, 8, 9 and 10 of Regulation (EC) No 438/2001 - Duty to state reasons - Lack of competence))

2014/C 151/21

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, Agent, and by P. Gentili, avvocato dello Stato)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Steiblytė and D. Recchia, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application to annul Commission Decision C (2009) 10350 final of 22 December 2009 reducing the financial assistance from the European Regional Development Fund allocated to the Italian Republic pursuant to Commission Decision C(2000) 2349 of 8 August 2000, approving the regional operational programme POR Puglia, in respect of the period 2000-2006, under objective No 1.

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Italian Republic to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Italian Republic to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 148, 5.6.2010.

1

---
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5038 

To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to modify the definition 

of a household under the supplemental nutrition assistance program, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 16, 2020 

Ms. DUCKWORTH (for herself and Mr. DURBIN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to modify 

the definition of a household under the supplemental 

nutrition assistance program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Supportive Living 

5 Food Access Protection Act of 2020’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS OF FOOD AND HOUSEHOLD. 

7 Section 3 of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 

8 U.S.C. 2012) is amended— 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 5038 IS

1 (1) in subsection (k)(3), by inserting ‘‘residen2 tial care settings provided funds by the appropriate 

3 State agency under regulations issued under section 

4 1915(c) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

5 1396n(c)),’’ before ‘‘public or private’’; and 

6 (2) in subsection (m)(5), by adding at the end 

7 the following: 

8 ‘‘(F)(i) Individuals who are 60 years of age 

9 or over or who receive supplemental security in10 come benefits or disability or blindness pay11 ments under title I, II, X, XIV, or XVI of the 

12 Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 301 et seq.) who 

13 reside in a residential care setting provided 

14 funds by the appropriate State agency under 

15 regulations issued under section 1915(c) of the 

16 Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396n(c)); and 

17 ‘‘(ii) the spouses of those individuals if the 

18 spouse resides in a residential care setting de19 scribed in clause (i).’’. 

20 SEC. 3. ISSUANCE AND USE OF PROGRAM BENEFITS. 

21 Section 7(f)(2)(B)(ii) of the Food and Nutrition Act 

22 of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 2016(f)(2)(B)(ii)) is amended by insert23 ing ‘‘and residential care settings provided funds by the 

24 appropriate State agency under regulations issued under 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 5038 IS

1 section 1915(c) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

2 1396n(c))’’ before the period at the end. 

3 SEC. 4. REVIEW OF PROGRAM OPERATIONS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 9(i)(2) of the Food and 

5 Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 2018(i)(2)) is amended 

6 by striking ‘‘December 31, 2020’’ and inserting ‘‘the date 

7 that is 1 year after the date of enactment of the Sup8 portive Living Food Access Protection Act of 2020’’. 

9 (b) REGULATIONS.—The Secretary shall promulgate 

10 any regulations necessary to carry out the amendment 

11 made by subsection (a) not later than 1 year after the 

12 date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
### §§87 to 89. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–325, title VI, §602(e)(2)–(4), Sept. 23, 1994, 108 Stat. 2291

Section 87, R.S. §5203, related to restriction on use by bank of its circulating notes.

Section 88, R.S. §5206, related to restriction on use by bank of notes of other banks.

Section 89, R.S. §5196, related to duty of bank to receive circulating notes of other banks in payment of debts.
#### The Pennsylvania Company et al. *v.*Mascoe et al.

[No. 12,120.

Filed April 2, 1925.]

From the Marion Superior Court (A 18,048); *Theophilus J. Moll,*Judge.

Action by John Mascoe and another against the Pennsylvania Company and another. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendants appeal.

*Affirmed.*

*Pickens, Gause, Davidson & Pickens,*for appellants.

*Galvin & West,*for appellees.

Nichols, J.

This case involves the.same flood event and presents substantially the same questions as the case of *Pennsylvania Co.*v. *Watson*(1925), *ante*496, 146 N. E. 763.

On the authority of that case, the judgment is affirmed.
### §1666i–2. Additional limits on interest rate increases

#### (a) Limitation on increases within first year

Except in the case of an increase described in paragraph (1), (2), (3), or (4) of section 1666i–1(b) of this title, no increase in any annual percentage rate, fee, or finance charge on any credit card account under an open end consumer credit plan shall be effective before the end of the 1-year period beginning on the date on which the account is opened.

#### (b) Promotional rate minimum term

No increase in any annual percentage rate applicable to a credit card account under an open end consumer credit plan that is a promotional rate (as that term is defined by the Bureau) shall be effective before the end of the 6-month period beginning on the date on which the promotional rate takes effect, subject to such reasonable exceptions as the Bureau may establish, by rule.

(Pub. L. 90–321, title I, §172, as added Pub. L. 111–24, title I, §101(d), May 22, 2009, 123 Stat. 1738; amended Pub. L. 111–203, title X, §1100A(2), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 2107.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2010—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 111–203 substituted "Bureau" for "Board" in two places.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2010 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 111–203 effective on the designated transfer date, see section 1100H of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as a note under section 552a of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### Effective Date

Section effective 9 months after May 22, 2009, except as otherwise specifically provided, see section 3 of Pub. L. 111–24, set out as an Effective Date of 2009 Amendment note under section 1602 of this title.
§ 515.5 Responses to requests for access to records. ( a ) *Acknowledgement of requests.* Upon receipt of a request, the Privacy Act Officer ordinarily shall, within 20 working days, send an acknowledgement letter which shall confirm the requester's agreement to pay fees under § 515.9 and provide an assigned request number.
( b ) *Grants of requests for access.* Once the Privacy Act Officer makes a determination to grant a request for access in whole or in part, it shall notify the requester in writing. The notice shall inform the requester of any fee charged under § 515.9 of this part and the Privacy Act Officer shall disclose records to the requester promptly on payment of any applicable fee. If a request is made in person, the Privacy Act Officer will disclose the records to the requester directly, in a manner not unreasonably disruptive of its operations, on payment of any applicable fee and with a written record made of the grant of the request. If a requester is accompanied by another individual, the requester shall be required to authorize in writing any discussion of the records in the presence of the other person.
( c ) *Adverse determinations of requests for access.* If the Privacy Act Officer makes any adverse determination denying a request for access in any respect, it shall notify the requester of that determination in writing. The notification letter shall be signed by the official making the determination and include: ( 1 ) The name and title of the person responsible for the denial;
( 2 ) A brief statement of the reason(s) for the denial, including any Privacy Act exemption(s) applied to the denial;
( 3 ) A statement that the denial may be appealed under § 515.7 and a description of the requirements of § 515.7.
S. 1398

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

An Act

To clarify certain boundaries on maps relating to the Coastal Barrier Resources

System.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES

SYSTEM MAPS.

(a) IN GENERAL.—The 7 maps described in subsection (b) are

replaced by 14 maps entitled ‘‘Dare County, North Carolina, Coastal

Barrier Resources System, Cape Hatteras Unit NC–03P’’ or ‘‘Dare

County, North Carolina, Coastal Barrier Resources System, Cape

Hatteras Unit NC–03P, Hatteras Island Unit L03’’ and dated

October 18, 1999.

(b) DESCRIPTION OF MAPS.—The maps described in this subsection are the 7 maps that—

(1) relate to the portions of Cape Hatteras Unit NC–03P

and Hatteras Island Unit L03 that are located in Dare County,

North Carolina; and

(2) are included in a set of maps entitled ‘‘Coastal Barrier

Resources System’’, dated October 24, 1990, and referred to

in section 4(a) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C.

3503(a)).

(c) AVAILABILITY.—The Secretary of the Interior shall keep the

maps referred to in subsection (a) on file and available for inspection
S. 1398—2

in accordance with section 4(b) of the Coastal Barrier Resources

Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(b)).

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
§ 391.3 Overtime and holiday rates. For each calendar year, FSIS will calculate the overtime and holiday rates, per hour per program employee, provided pursuant to §§ 307.5, 350.7, 351.8, 351.9, 352.5, 354.101, 355.12, 362.5, and 381.38 of this chapter, using the following formulas: ( a ) *Overtime rate.* The quotient of dividing the Office of Field Operations plus Office of International Affairs inspection program personnel's previous fiscal year's regular direct pay by the previous fiscal year's regular hours, plus the quotient multiplied by the calendar year's percentage of cost of living increase, multiplied by 1.5, plus the benefits rate, plus the travel and operating rate, plus the overhead rate, plus the allowance for bad debt rate.
( b ) *Holiday rate.* The quotient of dividing the Office of Field Operations plus Office of International Affairs inspection program personnel's previous fiscal year's regular direct pay by the previous fiscal year's regular hours, plus the quotient multiplied by the calendar year's percentage of cost of living increase, multiplied by 2, plus the benefits rate, plus the travel and operating rate, plus the overhead rate, plus the allowance for bad debt rate.
( c ) FSIS will calculate the benefits rate, the travel and operating rate, the overhead rate, and the allowance for bad debt rate using the formulas set forth in § 391.2(b), and the cost of living increases and percentage of inflation factors set forth in § 391.2(c).
[76 FR 20227, Apr. 12, 2011]
# C_2015221EN.01001601.xml

| 6.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/16

---

Order of the General Court of 12 May 2015 — Stichting Woonpunt and Others v Commission

(Case T-203/10 RENV) (1)

1

((State aid - Social housing - Scheme of aid granted to housing corporations - Existing aid - Decision accepting Member State’s commitments - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2015/C 221/22)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Stichting Woonpunt (Maastricht, Netherlands); Stichting Havensteder, formerly Stichting Com.wonen (Rotterdam, Netherlands); Woningstichting Haag Wonen (The Hague, Netherlands); and Stichting Woonbedrijf SWS.Hhvl (Eindhoven, Netherlands) (represented initially by P. Glazener and E. Henny and subsequently by P. Glazener, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P.-J. Loewenthal and S. Noë, Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the applicants: Kingdom of Belgium (represented initially by T. Materne and J.-C. Halleux, and subsequently by J.-C. Halleux, Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicants

Intervener in support of the defendant: Vereniging van Institutionele Beleggers in Vastgoed, Nederland (IVBN) (Voorburg, Pays-Bas) (represented by: M. Meulenbelt, lawyer)

Intervener in support of the defendant

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 9963 final of 15 December 2009 relating to State aid E 2/2005 and N 642/2009 — Netherlands — Existing and special project aid to housing corporations.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Orders Stichting Woonpunt, Stichting Havensteder, Woningstichting Haag Wonen and Stichting Woonbedrijf SWS.Hhvl to bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Stichting Woonpunt, Stichting Havensteder, Woningstichting Haag Wonen and Stichting Woonbedrijf SWS.Hhvl to bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of Belgium and Vereniging van Institutionele Beleggers in Vastgoed, Nederland (IVBN) to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of Belgium and Vereniging van Institutionele Beleggers in Vastgoed, Nederland (IVBN) to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 179, 3.7.2010.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report  of Sunburst Acquisitions VI, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form  10-QSB for the period ending October 31, 2006  (the
"Report"), I,  Michael R. Quinn, Principal Executive Officer  and  Principal
Financial  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to  18  U.S.C.  Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of  2002,
that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the  Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.



/s/ Michael R. Quinn

-----------------------
Principal Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer
Date: August 3, 2007