alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Seibert *v.*City of Evansville et al.

[No. 12,345.

Filed October 6, 1925.]

*Appeal.—No question presented for consideration on appeal ivhere appellant’s brief does not comply with Rule 22 of the Supreme and Appellate*Courts.—No question is presented for consideration on appeal where appellant has not complied with Rule 22 of the Supreme and Appellate Courts in the preparation of his brief.

*446From Vanderburgh Probate Court; *Elmer Q. Lock-year,*Judge.

Suit by Edwin Seibert against the city of Evansville and others. From a judgment for defendants, the plaintiff appeals. *Affirmed.*By the court in banc.

*Thomas A. McDonald,*for appellant.

*John R. Brill*and *John W. Brady,*for appellees.

Per Curiam.

The appellant, in his brief filed’herein, informs us that “this is an action for an injunction, based upon a verified complaint, filed in the Vanderburgh Probate Court, * * *, asking for an injunction against the defendants enjoining them, and each of them, from enforcing a judgment rendered against him in the City Court of the City of Evansville.”

Under a heading—“What the issues are”—he says: “That the judgment is void because * * *,” and he proceeds to state five alleged reasons why, as he thinks, *some*judgment is erroneous and void, but whether the said judgment to which he refers is the judgment the enforcement of which he sought to enjoin, or the judgment from which this appeal was prosecuted—if there was any such judgment—is left entirely to-conjecture.

Nowhere in his brief is a copy of his said complaint set out; the brief herein fails to inform us as to the nature of the judgment appealed from; we are left to surmise as to whether a demurrer was interposed to his said complaint and the same sustained and .judgment rendered against appellant thereon, or, as to whether there was a trial of this cause upon the merits which-resulted in a judgment against appellant; he has not informed us as to the specific error or errors of which he complains, and, from said brief, it is impossible to tell whether he is complaining of a ruling upon a demurrer, the admitting or the excluding of evidence, or the overruling of a motion for a new trial; the brief *447contains no statement of “Errors Assigned,” or of “Errors Relied Upon for Reversal”; no demurrer or motion for a new trial is mentioned in said brief, if any was filed.

Counsel for- appellant has utterly ignored Rule 22 of the Supreme Court, and of this court, in the preparation of said brief, and said brief is so prepared that no question is presented for our consideration arid the cause-must therefore be affirmed.
#### § 352.8 Time of inspection in the field and in an official exotic animal establishment.

The official exotic animal establishment on behalf of the applicant shall notify the Regional Director or designee, in advance, of the hours when such inspection is desired. Inspection personnel shall have access at all times to every part of any field ante-mortem inspection area and/or official exotic animal establishment to which they are assigned.

[54 FR 1332, Jan. 13, 1989]
#### Margaret Rooney, as Administratrix, etc., of John Rooney, Deceased, Respondent, v. Brogan Construction Company, Appellant.

Motion for leave to appeal to .the Court of Appeals granted. Present — Woodward, Jenks, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ.
}

UY, om

|
|
07 7 08
|
I
|

18°

b
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

30

Monument;

SROs
oO

Boundary

j
|
|
|

National

09

SS

2 &

©

Sy

I

|

|

I

I

I

|

I

I
Ironwood | Forest:
T
|
ir
il
|

24

10

| pyooup

11

|
|
12

PY uoReIS) dung

TRAVEL MANAGEMENT

Ironwood Forest National Monument

Draft Resource Management Plan and
Environmental Impact Statement
March 2007

TRAVEL ROUTE INVENTORY

Township 11 South
Range 10 East

Gila and Salt River Principal Meridian, Arizona

National Monument Boundary

Public Lands Administered by the
Bureau of Land Management

State Trust Lands

Military Reservation

—— Monument Travel Route Inventory

Universal Transverse Mercator
Zone 12, Units Meters
Clark 1866 Spheriod

NAD27 Datum

i} 1 Miles

No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
for the use of this map for purposes not intended by the BLM, or
to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the information
shown. Spatial information may not meet National map Accuracy
Standards. This information may be updated without notification.

(S23) United States Department of the Interior
‘eq by Bureau of Land Management
Y

Tucson Field Office
SF Arizona

S
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Rural Development Announces Senior Executive Leadership Changes

WASHINGTON, Nov. 14, 2017 – Assistant to the Secretary for Rural Development Anne Hazlett today 

announced the following changes in Senior Executive Service leadership roles at USDA Rural Development:

Claudette Fernandez is now Assistant Administrator for Water and Environmental Programs in the Rural 

Utilities Service. Fernandez brings 15 years of community development experience to her new role. She 

has held various leadership positions within USDA Rural Development’s Rural Business-Cooperative 

Service since 2014. Prior to USDA, she served as senior program manager for more than 10 years at the 

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 

Bryan Hooper is now the Deputy Administrator for Business Programs in the Rural BusinessCooperative Service. Hooper brings 11 years of leadership in managing federal commercial loan 

programs to his new role, including 5 years as the head of Credit Risk Management at the Small 

Business Administration (SBA).

Joyce Allen is now the Deputy Administrator for Multi-Family Housing Programs in the Rural Housing 

Service. Since 2011, Allen has managed USDA Rural Development’s Single Family Housing Programs. 

Prior to that role, Allen spent more than 20 years working in affordable multi-family housing both at 

USDA and the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). 

Cathy Glover is now detailed as Deputy Administrator for Single Family Housing Programs in the Rural 

Housing Service. Glover has nearly 30 years of affordable housing experience. She started her career 

with USDA in 1988 and has worked at the local, State and National Office levels of Rural Development. 

She also spent two years with HUD, working in the Federal Housing Administration’s (FHA) Home 

Mortgage Insurance Division.

These program leadership changes are effective immediately. USDA Rural Development encourages partners 

and stakeholder groups to reach out to these leaders in their new roles to build on existing partnerships and 

create new ones. 

#

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
### §2207. Young, beginning, and small farmers and ranchers

(a) Under policies of the Farm Credit Bank board, each association shall prepare a program for furnishing sound and constructive credit and related services to young, beginning, and small farmers and ranchers. Such programs shall assure that such credit and services are available in coordination with other institutions of the Farm Credit System serving the territory and with other governmental and private sources of credit. Each program shall be subject to review and approval by the supervising bank.

(b) The Farm Credit Bank for each district shall annually obtain from associations under its supervision reports of activities under programs developed pursuant to subsection (a) and progress toward program objectives. On the basis of such reports, the bank shall provide to the Farm Credit Administration an annual report summarizing the operations and achievements in its district under such programs.

(Pub. L. 92–181, title IV, §4.19, as added Pub. L. 96–592, title IV, §403, Dec. 24, 1980, 94 Stat. 3446; amended Pub. L. 100–399, title IX, §901(i), (j), Aug. 17, 1988, 102 Stat. 1007; Pub. L. 115–334, title V, §5411(25), Dec. 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 4682.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 115–334 struck out "district" before "Farm Credit Bank board" and "Federal land bank association and production credit" before "association shall prepare" and substituted "institutions" for "units".

1988—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 100–399, §901(i), inserted "Farm Credit Bank" after "district".

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 100–399, §901(j), substituted "The Farm Credit Bank for each district" for "The Federal land bank and the Federal intermediate credit bank for each district", "under its supervision" for "under their supervision", "subsection (a)" for "subsection (a) of this section", "the bank shall" for "the banks shall", "an annual report" for "a joint annual report", and "achievements in its district" for "achievements in their district".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1988 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 100–399 effective immediately after amendment made by section 401 of Pub. L. 100–233, which was effective 6 months after Jan. 6, 1988, see section 1001(b) of Pub. L. 100–399, set out as a note under section 2002 of this title.
#### § 418.2 Notification.

Each official establishment must promptly notify the local FSIS District Office within 24 hours of learning or determining that an adulterated or misbranded meat, meat food, poultry, or poultry product received by or originating from the official establishment has entered commerce, if the official establishment believes or has reason to believe that this has happened. The official establishment must inform the District Office of the type, amount, origin, and destination of the adulterated or misbranded product.
Exhibit 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of SUNBURST ACQUISITIONS V, INC.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending October 31, 2006,
(the "Report"), I, Terence Ho, Director of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)	The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the Company's financial position and results of
operations.

Date: March 10, 2007

	/s/ Terence Ho
	Director
### §1241. Definitions

As used in this chapter—

(a) The term "interstate commerce" means commerce between any State, Territory, possession of the United States, or the District of Columbia, and any place outside thereof.

(b) The term "switchblade knife" means any knife having a blade which opens automatically—

(1) by hand pressure applied to a button or other device in the handle of the knife, or

(2) by operation of inertia, gravity, or both.

(Pub. L. 85–623, §1, Aug. 12, 1958, 72 Stat. 562.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 85–623, which enacted sections 1241 to 1244 of this title and amended section 1716 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 85–623, §6, Aug. 12, 1958, 72 Stat. 563, provided that: "This Act [enacting this chapter and amending section 1716 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure] shall take effect on the sixtieth day after the date of its enactment [Aug. 12, 1958]."

#### Short Title of 1986 Amendment

Pub. L. 99–570, title X, §10001, Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3207–166, provided that: "This title [enacting section 1245 of this title, amending section 1716 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, and enacting provisions set out as a note under section 1245 of this title] may be cited as the 'Ballistic Knife Prohibition Act of 1986'."

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 85–623, Aug. 12, 1958, 72 Stat. 562, which enacted this chapter, is popularly known as the "Federal Switchblade Act".
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 30, 2020

a0622

Order 

Clerk

June 30, 2020

160325

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 160325

COA: 350200

Oakland CC: 2011-239290-FC

MEGAEL T.J. CLEMONS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 28, 2019 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
### §1224. Antitrust laws as affected

No provision of this chapter shall repeal, modify, or supersede, directly or indirectly, any provision of the antitrust laws of the United States.

(Aug. 8, 1956, ch. 1038, §4, 70 Stat. 1125.)
Exhibit 10.4

FINANCIAL SECURITY ASSURANCE HOLDINGS LTD.

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan

As Amended and Restated

as of November 14, 2002

---

FINANCIAL SECURITY ASSURANCE HOLDINGS LTD.

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan

CONTENTS

|          |  |                                       |  | Page
|--------- |  | ------------------------------------- |  | ----
|ARTICLE 1 |  | Purposes of Plan                      |  | 1   
|ARTICLE 2 |  | Definitions                           |  | 1   
|ARTICLE 3 |  | Participation                         |  | 3   
|ARTICLE 4 |  | Restoration of Benefits               |  | 3   
|ARTICLE 5 |  | Administration and General Provisions |  | 7   

i

---

FINANCIAL SECURITY ASSURANCE HOLDINGS LTD.

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan

ARTICLE 1. Purposes of Plan.

ARTICLE 2. Definitions.



1

---



2

---

ARTICLE 3. Participation.

ARTICLE 4. Restoration of Benefits.



Completed Years of Service

PercentageLess than 2

02

203

404

605

806 or more

100


3

---

4

---



5

---



6

---

ARTICLE 5. Administration and General Provisions.



7

---



8

---



9

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

**SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350,CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE**

 

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), theundersigned officers of Corgenix Medical Corporation, a Nevada corporation (the“Company”), does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report ofCorgenix Medical Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31,2009 as filed with the Securities an Exchange Commission (the “10-Q Report”)that:

 

i.        the 10-Q Report fullycomplies with the guidance of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

ii.     the informationcontained in the 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of we.

 

Dated:    February 11, 2010

 

**This Certification is made solely for purposes of 18U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein,and not for any other purpose.**

 

**A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to we and willbe retained by we and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request. This written statement shall not be deemed to be “filed”as part of the quarterly report on Form 10-Q that it accompanies.**

 
| /s/ Douglass T. Simpson                            |   |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| President and Chief  Executive Officer             |   |
|                                               |   |
| /s/ William H.  Critchfield                        |   |
| Senior Vice President  and Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
October 2, 2015

Mr. Bruce Henry

9375 Southwest 153 rd Avenue

Beaverton, OR 97007

Dear Mr. Henry :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We received your July 8, 2015 exemption request filed in D ocket No

. FAA− 20 15

− 2808 , but

we are unable to process your request any further. Your petition does no t comply with the

requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must

send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and the extent of

the relief you seek.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to su pport your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html . This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Aviation A dministration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exem ption

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

/ s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure s34
#### § 548.6 Canning and canned products.

The requirements for canning and canned products in 9 CFR part 431 apply to fish products that are canned.

[80 FR 75616, Dec. 2, 2015, as amended at 83 FR 25325, May 31, 2018]
### §3908. Vessel deemed public vessel

While assigned to authorized Coast Guard duty, any motorboat or yacht shall be deemed to be a public vessel of the United States and a vessel of the Coast Guard within the meaning of sections 937 and 938 of this title and other applicable provisions of law.

(Aug. 4, 1949, ch. 393, 63 Stat. 555, §827; Pub. L. 104–324, title IV, §406, Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3924; renumbered §3908 and amended Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §§119(b), 123(b)(2), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4236, 4240.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 14, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §266 (Feb. 19, 1941, ch. 8, title I, §7, 55 Stat. 10).

Changes were made in phraseology. 81st Congress, House Report No. 557.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282, §123(b)(2), substituted "sections 937 and 938" for "sections 646 and 647".

Pub. L. 115–282, §119(b), renumbered section 827 of this title as this section.

1996—Pub. L. 104–324 reenacted section catchline without change and amended text generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "Any motorboat or yacht, while assigned to authorized Coast Guard duty shall be deemed to be a public vessel of the United States, and within the meaning of section 646 of this title shall be deemed to be a vessel of the Coast Guard."
**Exhibit 31.2****Chief Financial Officer Certification**I, Robert Giambrone, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 of KBW, Inc. (the “Registrant”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of,and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controlsand procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financialreporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theRegistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or causedsuch internal control over financial reporting to be designed underour supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding thereliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this quarterly report based on suchevaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofRegistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.Date: May 7, 2008/s/ ROBERT GIAMBRONE