alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1

                        UNITRONIX CORPORATION


                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
           SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Unitronix Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                  /s/Dale M. Hendrick
November 12, 2003 ------------------------
                   Dale M. Hendrick
                   President and Chief Executive Officer
                  /s/William C. Wimer
November 12, 2003 ------------------------
                   William C. Wimer
                   Vice President of Operations and
                   Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32
                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                   18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     The undersigned hereby certifies that to her knowledge the
quarterly report of TMS, Inc. (the "Company") filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly
represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to TMS, Inc. and will
be retained by TMS, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Date: January 14, 2004



                     /s/ Deborah D. Mosier
                     -----------------------------
                     Deborah D. Mosier
                     President and Chief Financial Officer,
                     Principal Executive and Financial Officer
-  Home 

# Special Permit Interagency Coordination Process

InterAgencyCoordination.pdf (59.71 KB)

*DOT is committed to ensuring that information is available in appropriate alternative formats to meet the requirements of persons who have a disability. If you require an alternative version of files provided on this page, please contact          PHMSA-Accessibility@dot.gov.*
Exhibit 32.2


 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Dial Thru
 International Corporation (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended October
 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
 hereof ("this Report"), I, Allen Sciarillo, Chief Financial Officer of the
 Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. S 1350, as adopted pursuant
 to S 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)  This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)  The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
 Company.


 Date: January 29, 2004             /s/ ALLEN SCIARILLO
                                    ___________________
                                    Allen Sciarillo
                                    Chief Financial Officer
§ 557.5 Importer to make application for inspection of fish and fish products for entry. ( a ) Applicants must submit an import inspection application, to apply for the inspection of any product offered for entry. Applicants may apply for inspection using a paper or electronic application form.
( b ) Import inspection applications for each consignment must be submitted, electronically or on paper, to FSIS in advance of the shipment's arrival at the official import establishment where the product will be reinspected, but no later than when the entry is filed with U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
( c ) The provisions of this section do not apply to products that are exempted from inspection by §§ 557.16 and 557.17.
§ 381.185 Assistance to State and Territorial programs. ( a ) The Administrator is authorized, under paragraph (a) of section 5 of the Act, when he determines it would effectuate the purposes of the Act, to cooperate with any State (including Puerto Rico) or any organized territory in developing and administering the poultry product inspection program of such jurisdiction, with a view to assuring that it imposes and enforces requirements at least equal to those under sections 2 through 4, 6 through 10, and 12 through 22 of the Act, with respect to establishments at which poultry are slaughtered or poultry products are processed for use as human food, solely for distribution within such jurisdiction, and with respect to the poultry products of such establishments. Such cooperation is authorized if the jurisdiction has enacted a mandatory law imposing ante mortem and post mortem inspection, reinspection, and sanitation requirements (at least equal to those under the Federal Act), with respect to all or certain classes of persons engaged in slaughtering poultry or otherwise processing poultry products for use as human food solely for distribution within such jurisdiction.
( b ) The Administrator is also authorized under paragraph (a) of section 5 of the Act, to cooperate with any State (including Puerto Rico) or any organized territory in developing and administering programs under the laws of such jurisdiction containing authorities at least equal to those provided in section 11 of the Act (relating to records; registration of specified classes of operators; dead, dying, disabled, or diseased poultry; and products not intended for human food) when he determines that such cooperation would effectuate the purposes of the Act.
( c ) Such cooperation may include advisory assistance, technical and laboratory assistance and training, and financial aid. The Federal contribution to any State (or territory) for any year shall not exceed 50 percent of the estimated total cost of the cooperative State (or territorial) program. A cooperative program under this section is called a State-Federal program.
§ 146.24 Terminology and classification; States. ( a ) *U.S. H5/H7 Avian Influenza Monitored State, Layers.* ( 1 ) A State will be declared a U.S. H5/H7 Avian Influenza Monitored State, Layers when it has been determined by the Service that: ( i ) All commercial table-egg layer flocks and all commercial table-egg layer pullet flocks that supply those flocks in production within the State that are not exempt from the special provisions of this subpart B under § 146.22 are classified as U.S. H5/H7 Avian Influenza Monitored under § 146.23(a) of this part;
( ii ) All egg-type chicken breeding flocks in production within the State are classified as U.S. Avian Influenza Clean under § 145.23(h) of this subchapter;
( iii ) All persons performing poultry disease diagnostic services within the State are required to report to the Official State Agency, within 24 hours, the source of all table-egg layer and table-egg layer pullet specimens that were deemed positive on an official test for avian influenza, as designated in § 146.13(a) of this chapter;
( iv ) All table-egg layer and table-egg layer pullet specimens that were deemed positive on an official test for avian influenza, as designated in § 146.13(a) of this chapter, are sent to an authorized laboratory for subtyping; and
( v ) All table-egg layer and table-egg layer pullet flocks within the State that are found to be infected with the H5/H7 subtypes of avian influenza are quarantined, in accordance with an initial State response and containment plan as described in part 56 of this chapter and under the supervision of the Official State Agency.
( 2 ) If there is a discontinuation of any of the conditions described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, or if repeated outbreaks of the H5/H7 subtypes of avian influenza occur in commercial table-egg layer flocks as described in paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section, or if an infection spreads from the originating premises, the Service shall have grounds to revoke its determination that the State is entitled to this classification. Such action shall not be taken until a thorough investigation has been made by the Service and the Official State Agency has been given an opportunity for a hearing in accordance with rules of practice adopted by the Administrator.
( b ) [Reserved]
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0007) [71 FR 56328, Sept. 26, 2006, as amended at 75 FR 10658, Mar. 9, 2010; 76 FR 15797, Mar. 22, 2011]
# C_2010100EN.01006902.xml

| 17.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 100/69 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 100/69

---

Action brought on 19 January 2010 — Garcia Lledo and Others v OHIM

(Case F-7/10)

2010/C 100/101

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Inès Garcia Lledo (Alicante, Spain) and Others (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, H.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

The annulment of the decisions of the President of OHIM to terminate the applicants’ employment as members of the temporary staff because they are not successful candidates in an open competition.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | Annul the decisions of the President of OHIM of 12 March 2009 to terminate applicants’ employment as members of the temporary staff; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decisions of the President of OHIM of 12 March 2009 to terminate applicants’ employment as members of the temporary staff;

| — | Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to pay the costs.

---
UNITED STATES NAVY–MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

_________________________

No. 201700267

_________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v.

MICHAEL A. KUHNS

Culinary Specialist Second Class (SW) (E-5), U.S. Navy

Appellant

_________________________

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Commander William Weiland, JAGC, USN.

Convening Authority: Commandant, Naval District Washington, 

Washington Navy Yard, DC.

Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation: Commander J.A. Link,

JAGC, USN.

For Appellant: Lieutenant Commander Derek C. Hampton, JAGC, 

USN.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________

Decided 29 December 2017

_________________________

Before HUTCHISON, SAYEGH, and KOVAC, Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening 

authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c). 

The Supplemental Court-Martial Order will reflect that Charge II was a 

violation of Article 134, UCMJ.

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
# C_2011232EN.01004002.xml

| 6.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 232/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 232/40

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 28 June 2011 — AS v Commission

(Case F-55/10) (1)

(Staff case - Officials - Notice of vacancy - Rejection of application - Legal interest in bringing proceedings - Official on invalidity - Decision to reject candidature not inseparable from decision to appoint - Distinction drawn between officials in the same function group and holding the same grade and at a different stage in their career)

(2011/C 232/70)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: AS (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: N. Lhoëst, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and B. Eggers, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision refusing to take into consideration the applicant’s application for a post as a library assistant and for an order for the Commission to pay her a sum as compensation for the material and non-material damage suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of 30 September 2009 by which the European Commission rejected AS’s application;; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of 30 September 2009 by which the European Commission rejected AS’s application;;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay AS the sum of EUR 3 000; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay AS the sum of EUR 3 000;

| 3. | Dismisses the remainder of the action; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Dismisses the remainder of the action;

| 4. | Orders the European Commission to pay, in addition to its own costs, three quarters of AS’s costs; |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the European Commission to pay, in addition to its own costs, three quarters of AS’s costs;

| 5. | Orders AS to pay a quarter of her own costs. |
| --- | --- |

5.

Orders AS to pay a quarter of her own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 246, 11.9.2010, p. 43.

---
03/30/201 1 14:1 4 FAX 2024935142 FAA, ->DMS @l001/002 

Q 

U.S. Department Q^^ ^ ^, ,^g ^.^l^f Counsel 800 Indapendence Ave,, SW. 

of Transportation Washington, DC 20591 

Federal Aviation 

Adminlstrofion 

l^n :,^:..,;:;' 

March 30, 2011 'Zir2m 

Hearing Dt>cket Clerk, AGC-430 -fT 0§ ^ 

Federal Aviation Administration — cy J 

600 Independence Ave, SW., Wilbiir Wright Building ""' 

Suite 2Wi000 

Washington, DC 20591 

RE: Application of Recmrent TpipiT^P Center. Inc.. FAA Docket No. CPl 0GT.0010; 

FDMS No. FAA-2010-0973 

Dear Hearing Docket Clerk, 

In accordance with section 13.233(e)(1) of the Rules ofPraciice in FAA Civil Penalty Actions, 

14 C.F.R. § 13.233(e)(l), counsel for the Complainant and the Applicant have orally agreed to 

extend the tiinc for Complainant to file its reply brief in the above-referenced case until April 18, 

2011. The requested extension will provide the parties with time to conduct settlement 

discussions. The oral agreement is in light of the Applicant's counsel's current vacation and the 

resulting impracticability of his reviewing and/or executing documents. 

Sincerel' :=^X 

John C. Stuart Jr. 

linforcement Division, AGC-300 

cc: Charles R. Damett, III. 
03/30/2011 14:14 FAX 2024935142 FAA + DMS 0002/002 

CERTTFTCATF. OF SF.RVICF. 

I hereby certify that on this date, I served the original and one copy of the foregoing 

Letter in Application of Recurrent Training Center. Inc., FAA Docket No. CPIOGLOOIO; FDMS 

No. FAA-2010-0973, by personal delivery, addressed to: 

Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Federal Aviation Administration 

600 Independence Ave, SW., Wilbur Wright Building 

Suite 2W1000 

Washington, DC 20591 

In addition, I hereby certify that I served the foregoing letter, by electronic mail and by 

certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed to: 

Charles R. Baraell, III. 

Counsel for Applicant 

1664 Moorland Lane 

Crystal Lake, IL 60014-2985 

crb@bamettlegal.com 

DateXMarch30,2011
#### § 381.148 Processing and handling requirements for frozen poultry products.

Procedures with respect to processing of frozen ready-to-heat-and-eat poultry products or stuffed ready-to-roast poultry shall be in accordance with sound operating practices and carried out in a manner which will assure freedom from adulteration of the products. Products to be frozen shall be moved into the freezer promptly under such supervision by an inspector as is necessary to assure preservation of the products by prompt and efficient freezing. Adequate freezing facilities shall be provided within the official establishment where products to be frozen are prepared, except that, upon written request, and under such conditions as may be prescribed by the Administrator in specific cases, such products may be moved from the official establishment prior to freezing: *Provided,* That the official establishment and freezer are so located and the necessary arrangements are made so that the Inspection Service will have access to the freezing room and adequate opportunity to determine that the products are being properly handled and frozen.
Report of Independent Accountants


To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
The Glenmede Fund, Inc.:

In planning and performing our audit of the
financial statements of the Government Cash
Portfolio, Tax-Exempt Cash Portfolio, Core
Fixed Income Portfolio, Tax Managed Equity
Portfolio, Small Capitalization Equity Portfolio,
Large Cap Value Portfolio, International
Portfolio, Institutional International Portfolio,
Global Equity and Emerging Markets Portfolio
of The Glenmede Fund, Inc. (the "Fund") for the
year ended October 31, 1999, we considered its
internal control, including control activities for
safeguarding securities, in order to determine
our auditing procedures for the purpose of
expressing our opinion on the financial
statements and to comply with the requirements
of Form N-SAR, not to provide assurance on
internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for
establishing and maintaining internal control.  In
fulfilling this responsibility, estimates and
judgements by management are required to
assess the expected benefits and related costs of
controls.  Generally, controls that are relevant to
an audit pertain to the entity's objective of
preparing financial statements for external
purposes that are fairly presented in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles.
Those controls include the safeguarding of
assets against unauthorized acquisition, use or
disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal
control, errors or fraud may occur and not be
detected.  Also, projection of any evaluation of
internal control to future periods is subject to the
risk that controls may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions or that the
effectiveness of the design and operation may
deteriorate.

Our consideration of internal control would not
necessarily disclose all matters in internal
control that might be material weaknesses under
standards established by the American Institute
of Certified Public Accountants.  A material
weakness is a condition in which the design or
operation of one or more of the internal control
components does not reduce to a relatively low
level the risk that misstatements caused by error
or fraud in amounts that would be material in
relation to the financial statements being audited
may occur and not be detected within a timely
period by employees in the normal course of
performing their assigned functions.  However,
we noted no matters involving internal control
and its operation, including controls for
safeguarding securities, that we consider to be
material weaknesses as defined above as of
October 31, 1999.

This report is intended solely for the information
and use of the Board of Directors, management
and the Securities and Exchange Commission
and is not intended to be and should not be used
by anyone other than these specified parties.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Baltimore, Maryland
December 13, 1999
# C_2013325EN.01002902.xml

| 9.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 325/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 325/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 September 2013 — Laufen Austria v Commission

(Case T-411/10) (1)

1

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Bathroom fittings and fixtures markets of Belgium, Germany, France, Italy, the Netherlands and Austria - Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement - Coordination of price increases and exchange of sensitive business information - Attributability of unlawful conduct - Fines - 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines - Gravity of the infringement - Multipliers - Mitigating circumstances - Economic crisis - Pressure exerted by wholesalers - 2002 Leniency Notice - Reduction of the fine - Significant added value)

2013/C 325/49

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Laufen Austria AG (Wilhelmsburg, Austria) (represented by: E. Navarro Varona and L. Moscoso del Prado González, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented: initially by F. Castillo de la Torre, A. Antoniadis and F. Castilla Contreras, and subsequently by F. Castillo de la Torre, A. Antoniadis and F. Jimeno Fernández, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment in part of Commission Decision C(2010) 4185 final of 23 June 2010 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/39.092 — Bathroom Fittings and Fixtures) and for reduction of the fine imposed on the applicant in that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Laufen Austria AG to bear its own costs and to pay those of the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Laufen Austria AG to bear its own costs and to pay those of the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 301, 6.11.2010.

1

---