alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Corporation Model MD-90~30 Airplan s

14CFR Part 39

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

0,,46'

(Docket No. FAA-2010-1 I I I I; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-200-AD]

RlN 2120-AA64

[4910-13-PI

NOJRRENnS

oum<G $""'OOL

, M-I

IT

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Dcpamnent of Transportation

(DOT).

mount support fittings, which could lead to se~aration of the support fittings from the

pylon, and could result in separation of the engine from the airplane.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by [INSERT DATE 45

DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER].

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any orthe following methods:

• Federal eRulernaking Portal: Go to http://www.re~!Ulations.gov. Follow the

&/U/IO snlOOl.

~Ivl- 10\
"

':

(4910-I3-P]

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

IDocket No. FAA-2010-+++++; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-200-AD)

IUN 2120-AA64

Ainvorthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Corpodtion Model MD-90-30 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DJpartment ofTrall~portation

(DOT).

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to supersede an existing airworthiness directive (AD)

that applies to certain Model MD-90-30 airplanes. The existing AD currently requires a

detailed inspection for certain defects of the upper fasteners of the aft mount support

finings of the left and right engines, and corrective actions if necessary. This proposed

AD would instead require repetitive replacement ofttlc upper row of fasteners of the

support fittings of the engine aft mount with new fasteners; and perform repetitive

general visual inspections for defects of the lower ro",:f~~e~e~";w_ B)of the ~ort

~r----'-fittings of the left and right engine aft mounts, and' repladement all c1earanc~astellers in I A __ /l

the !o.... ver row ifnecessary. This proposed AD results fr0m'repo-rts ;;f1oose, cracked, or

missing fasteners in the aft mount suppon fitting of the Itft and right engines. We are

proposing this AD to prevent loose, cracked, or missing fasteners in the engine aft mount

support fittings, which could lead to separation of the support fittings from the pylon, and

could result in separation of the engine from the airplane.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by [INSERT DATE 45

DA YS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER].

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any ofthe follO\ving methods:

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.iregulationS,gOv. Follow the

I',N tll- \2-Cl-

{7 <-L

•.•.•.•••. l":s:"' ••••~

.{j~

~/i71/6

rOl.'T~SYWICl.

rLU'-

~""n.-lE

CUL,"',

~Th

5/17/10

~0IJ1WU"., ••~OL

1£:uL

~~;:tV

0'-.

>-/7-/0

Rou,"m "~••"OI.

lI'''w.s.'S,c"" TuRa

~"

'-"'/l""'S'I'IeOI.

..m..LS ..S"••.•. ""'"

FAA Form 1360·14.1 {6-B9) OFFICIAL FILE COpy ~U.&, GOYERNMENT PRiNT'NG OFF'>C~1"0;. ?ell-•• ,
§ 321.1 Assistance to State and Territorial programs. ( a ) The Administrator is authorized under paragraph (a) of section 301 of the Act, when he determines it would effectuate the purposes of the Act, to cooperate with any State (including Puerto Rico) or any organized Territory in developing and administering the meat inspection program of such jurisdiction with a view to assuring that it imposes and enforces requirements at least equal to those under Titles I and IV of the Act, with respect to establishments at which products are prepared for use as human food solely for distribution within such jurisdiction, and with respect to the products of such establishments. Such cooperation is authorized if the jurisdiction has enacted a law imposing mandatory ante-mortem and post-mortem inspection, reinspection, and sanitation requirements at least equal to the Federal requirements with respect to all or certain classes of persons engaged in slaughtering livestock or otherwise preparing products solely for distribution within such jurisdiction.
( b ) The Administrator is also authorized under paragraph (a) of section 301 of the Act to cooperate with any State (including Puerto Rico) or any organized Territory in developing and administering programs under the laws of such jurisdiction containing authorities at least equal to those in Title II of the Act (relating to records; registration of specified classes of operators; dead, dying, disabled, or diseased livestock; and products not intended for human food), when he determines that such cooperation would effectuate the purposes of the Act.
( c ) Such cooperation may include advisory assistance, technical and laboratory assistance and training, and financial aid. The Federal contribution to any State (or Territory) may not exceed 50 percent of the estimated total cost of the cooperative State (or Territorial) program. A cooperative program under this section is called a State-Federal program.
[35 FR 15604, Oct. 3, 1970]
#### § 592.380 Disposition of certificates.

The original and a copy of each certificate issued pursuant to § 592.370, and not to exceed two additional copies thereof if requested by the applicant prior to issuance, shall, immediately upon issuance, be delivered or mailed to the applicant or designee. Other copies shall be filed and retained in accordance with the disposition schedule for inspection program records.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
PERIOD ENDED JULY 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                           AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                             JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                             0
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 38,202<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                   46,580
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              87,715        
<PP&E>                                       135,492
<DEPRECIATION>                                37,480    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               230,607      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         44,868    
<BONDS>                                       95,011  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0 
<PREFERRED>                                        0 
<COMMON>                                          90 
<OTHER-SE>                                    80,406       
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 230,607         
<SALES>                                      259,190          
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             259,190          
<CGS>                                        232,069          
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                232,069          
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              14,232       
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             7,378       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                6,552       
<INCOME-TAX>                                   2,951      
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            3,601      
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  310      
<CHANGES>                                          0  
<NET-INCOME>                                   3,291 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    .38 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0
<FN>
<F1> Notes and accounts receivable -- trade are reported net of allowances for
     doubtful accounts in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
</FN> 
        
  

</TABLE>
Commercial/Industrial Pumps ASRAC Working Group: Public Meeting and Webinar

03/27/2014 07:35AM EDT

First Name Last Name Email Address City Industry State Organization Zip Code

Prem Vuppuluri 902 Battelle Blvd Richland Energy, Chemical, 

Utilities

WA Pacific 

Northwest 

National 

Laboratory

99354

Al Iseppon 293 Wright Street Delavan Manufacturing WI 53115

Rodney Mrkvicka 14040 Santa Fe 

Trail Drive

Lenexa Manufacturing KS Smith & 

Loveless Inc.

66215

Mark Menzer 11112 Chessington 

Pl

Reston VA 20194

Jeffrey Alascio 16250 Glendale Dr New Berlin Manufacturing WI ABB, Inc 53151

Erica Johnson 902 Battelle Blvd Richland WA 99354

Callie Reis 77 South Bedford 

Street

Burlington MA navigant 01803

Jiangang Hu 6400 W. Enterprise 

Dr.

Mequon Manufacturing WI 53092

Louis Verstegen 6400 West 

Enterprise Dr

Mequon Manufacturing WI 53092
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 16

- 00581

- CR

Javier PARRA

- PEREA

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 14, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 501025

Honorable Raymond Angelini, Judge Presiding 1

BEFORE JUSTICE BARNARD

, JUSTICE MARTINEZ , AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED

and this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED December 28, 2016.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

1 The Honorable Raymond Angelini, retired, sitting by assignment.
# C_2006281EN.01003701.xml

| 18.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/37

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 5 September 2006 — Finland v Commission

(Case T-350/05) (1)

1

(Preliminary issues - Objection of inadmissibility - Act without binding legal effect - Own resources of the European Communities - Infringement procedure - Default interest provided for in Article 11 of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1150/2000 - Negotiation of an agreement on a conditional payment)

(2006/C 281/64)

Language of the case: Finnish

Parties

Applicant: Republic of Finland (represented by: T. Pynnä and E. Bygglin, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: P. Aalto and G. Wilms, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Action for annulment of the decision of the Commission (General Secretariat) contained in the letter of 8 July 2005, by which the Commission refused to open negotiations with the Republic of Finland concerning the conditional payment of duties claimed retroactively together with default interest accrued up to the date of payment of those duties, claimed by the Commission from the Republic of Finland in the context of infringement procedure No 2003/2180, brought under Article 226 EC.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible;

| 2. | The Republic of Finland is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Republic of Finland is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 281, 12.11.2005.

1

---
2015 CROP YEAR

IRRIGATED PEANUTS

YIELD EXCLUSION (YE)

Gulf of Mexico

Atlantic

Ocean

Pacific

Ocean

-130° -120° -110° -100° -90° -80° -70°

45° 40° 35° 30° 25°

Coordinate System: Albers

Central Meridian: 96°0'0"W

1st Std Parallel: 20°0'0"N

2nd Std Parallel: 60°0'0"N

Latitude of Origin: 40°0'0"N

Metadata:

County Files - US Census Tiger

Files 2013

YE Coverage - USDA - RMA

December 2014

0 125 250 500 750 1,000

Miles

STATEMENT

The Maps produced represent

the number of years (since 1995)

eligible for yield exclusion for

the 2015 crop year.

Document Path: K:\APH\Irrigated\Peanuts\IrrigatedPeanuts.mxd

TABLE

Links directly to the state table

(double click)

Number of Years Eligible for

Yield Exclusion (YE)

0 years

1 year

2 to 4 years

5 to 7 years

8 to 10 years

11 to 15 years
§ 115.117 Hiring and promotion decisions. ( a ) The agency shall not hire or promote anyone who may have contact with detainees, and shall not enlist the services of any contractor or volunteer who may have contact with detainees, who has engaged in sexual abuse in a prison, jail, holding facility, community confinement facility, juvenile facility, or other institution (as defined in 42 U.S.C. 1997); who has been convicted of engaging or attempting to engage in sexual activity facilitated by force, overt or implied threats of force, or coercion, or if the victim did not consent or was unable to consent or refuse; or who has been civilly or administratively adjudicated to have engaged in such activity.
( b ) When the agency is considering hiring or promoting staff, it shall ask all applicants who may have contact with detainees directly about previous misconduct described in paragraph (a) of this section, in written applications or interviews for hiring or promotions and in any interviews or written self-evaluations conducted as part of reviews of current employees. The agency shall also impose upon employees a continuing affirmative duty to disclose any such misconduct.
( c ) Before hiring new employees who may have contact with detainees, the agency shall require a background investigation to determine whether the candidate for hire is suitable for employment with the agency. The agency shall conduct an updated background investigation for agency employees every five years.
( d ) The agency shall also perform a background investigation before enlisting the services of any contractor who may have contact with detainees.
( e ) Material omissions regarding such misconduct, or the provision of materially false information, shall be grounds for termination or withdrawal of an offer of employment, as appropriate.
( f ) Unless prohibited by law, the agency shall provide information on substantiated allegations of sexual abuse involving a former employee upon receiving a request from an institutional employer for whom such employee has applied to work.
( g ) In the event the agency contracts with a facility for the confinement of detainees, the requirements of this section otherwise applicable to the agency also apply to the facility.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1207 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1207

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to ensure that income 
    averaging for farmers not increase a farmer's liability for the 
                        alternative minimum tax.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 10, 1999

    Mr. Kohl (for himself, Mr. Burns, and Mr. Hagel) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to ensure that income 
    averaging for farmers not increase a farmer's liability for the 
                        alternative minimum tax.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Farmer Tax Fairness Act''.

SEC. 2. INCOME AVERAGING FOR FARMERS NOT TO INCREASE ALTERNATIVE 
              MINIMUM TAX LIABILITY.

    (a) In General.--Section 55(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(defining regular tax) is amended by redesignating paragraph (2) as 
paragraph (3) and by inserting after paragraph (1) the following:
            ``(2) Coordination with income averaging for farmers.--
        Solely for purposes of this section, section 1301 (relating to 
        averaging of farm income) shall not apply in computing the 
        regular tax.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1997.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2010209EN.01003001.xml

| 31.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/30

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție (Romania) lodged on 28 May 2010 — Criminal proceedings against Gheorghe Kita

(Case C-264/10)

()

2010/C 209/41

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Referring court

Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Gheorghe Kita

Question referred

Question referred

Is Article 5(3) of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA (1) of 13 June 2002 to be interpreted as meaning that the return (transfer) of the sentenced person, surrendered earlier in accordance with a European arrest warrant for the purposes of criminal proceedings, to the State of which he is a national takes place automatically, even without his consent, consent that is a condition imposed by the European Convention on the Transfer of Sentenced Persons?

1

---

(1)  Council Framework Decision on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States (OJ 2002 L 190, p. 1).

1

---
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1413

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the deduction

from the estate tax for family-owned business interests.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 22, 1999

Mr. DURBIN (for himself and Mr. DORGAN) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase

the deduction from the estate tax for family-owned business interests.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN ESTATE TAX DEDUCTION FOR

4 FAMILY-OWNED BUSINESS INTEREST.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2057(a)(2) of the Internal

6 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to maximum deduction)

7 is amended by striking ‘‘$675,000’’ and inserting

8 ‘‘$1,975,000’’.

9 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section

10 2057(a)(3)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (re-
2

•S 1413 IS

1 lating to coordination with unified credit) is amended by

2 striking ‘‘$675,000’’ each place it appears in the text and

3 heading and inserting ‘‘$1,975,000’’.

4 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

5 this section shall apply to estates of decedents dying after

6 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
UNIT

Rural 

ED SAT

Electrif

TES

i c

DEPARTMENT 

ation 

OF

Administration 

AGRICULTURE

BULLETIN 1753E-002

RD-GD-1994-15

SUBJECT: REA Telecommunications software License Agreement 

TO: All Telephone Borrowers

REA Telephone staff 

EFFECTIVE DATE: May 16, 1994 

EXPIRATION DATE: Date of change of 7 CFR part 1753.38,

paragraph (c} by rulemaking 

OFFICE OF PRIMARY INTEREST: Central Office Equipment Branch,

Telecommunications Standards Division 

FILING INSTRUCTIONS: File with 7 CFR 1753 and on REANET. 

PURPOSE: This bulletin provides a user-friendly reformatting of

the uniform Telecommunications Software License Agreement 

required by REA and codified at 7 CFR §1753.38 (c), as published 

on April 14, 1994, at 59 FR 17675. This bulletin simply sets out 

the codified contract addendum in a detachable usable format. 

Every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this 

document. However, in case of discrepancies, the regulation at

7 CFR §1753.38 (c) is the authorized source. 

_�G,fu fS ' 

A_d

,..

m

.....,_

i

....::,

n

::::;:i

:.....

s...:

t

'"""

r

'-,;

a

==

t

:::::;

o

_r

-=�-\

--1--{--==------.,-.=.==-......___ Date � 1 

Disclaimer: The contents of this guidance document does not have the force and

effect of law and is not meant to bind the public in any way. This document is 

intended only to provide clarity to the public regarding existing requirements

under the law or agency policies.

Disclaimer: The contents of this guidance document does not have the 

force and effect of law and is not meant to bind the public in any way. 

This document is intended only to provide clarity to the public 

regarding existing requirements under the law or agency policies.
I, Joerg Alte, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed  this  quarterly report  on  Form  10-QSB  of  Proteo, Inc.;

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly report  does not contain any untrue
statement  of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the  statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were  made,  not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other financial
information  included  in  this  annual  report,  fairly present in all material
respects  the  financial  condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Company  as  of,  and  for,  the  periods  presented  in  this  annual  report;

4.  I  am  responsible  for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures  (as  defined  in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(c) and 15d-15(c)) for the
Company  and  I  have:

a.  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in  which  this  annual  report  is  being  prepared;

b.  evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the  Company's  disclosure  controls  and
procedures  and  presented  in  this  Quarterly  Report my conclusions about the
effectiveness  of  the  disclosure controls and procedures  as of the end of the
period  covered  by  this  report and within 90 days prior to the filing date of
this report  (the  "Evaluation  Date");  and

c.  disclosed,  based  on  our most recent evaluation, to the Company's
auditors and the audit committee of the Company's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent  function), all significant deficiencies in the design
or  operation  of  internal  controls which could adversely affect the Company's
ability  to  record,  process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data and have
identified  for  the  Company's  auditors  any  material  weaknesses in internal
controls;  and  any  fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other  employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal controls;
and

5.  I  have  indicated  in  this  quarterly  report  whether  or  not there were
significant  changes  in  internal  controls  or  in  other  factors which could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
evaluation,   including  any  corrective  actions  with  regard  to  significant
deficiencies and material  weaknesses.

August 19, 2003    /s/ Joerg Alte
                   Name:  Joerg Alte
                   Title:  Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer