alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA to Prioritize Projects Supporting Regional Economic and Community Development 

Planning

 WASHINGTON, Feb. 28, 2020 – U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Deputy Under Secretary for Rural 

Development Donald “DJ” LaVoy today announced that USDA is providing funds to rural projects that support 

regional economic and community development planning.

 This Strategic Economic and Community Development (SECD) funding is authorized through a Farm Bill 

provision for applications submitted through the following programs:

• Community Facilities Loans, Grants and Loan Guarantees

• Water and Waste Disposal Program Loans, Grants and Loan Guarantees

• Business & Industry Program Loan Guarantees

• Rural Business Development Grants

To apply for the funding, applicants must meet underlying program requirements and submit the Form RD 

1980-88 to the nearest USDA office. Program funds available under SECD expire on June 30, 2020. Additional 

information is available on page 11947 of the Feb. 28, 2020, Federal Register.

Interested parties can learn more about this opportunity during a webinar on Thursday, March 12 at 3:00 p.m. 

Eastern Time. Register for the webinar at

https://globalmeetwebinar.webcasts.com/starthere.jsp?ei=1280242&tp_key=afc1a74d59.

 USDA encourages applications that will support recommendations made in the Report to the President of the 

United States from the Task Force on Agriculture and Rural Prosperity (PDF, 5.4 MB) to help improve the 

quality of life in rural America. Applicants are encouraged to consider projects that provide measurable results 

in helping rural communities build robust and sustainable economies through strategic investments in 

infrastructure, partnerships and innovation. Key strategies include:

• Achieving e-Connectivity for Rural America

• Developing the Rural Economy

• Harnessing Technological Innovation

• Supporting a Rural Workforce

• Improving Quality of Life 

USDA also encourages applications that will support the Administration’s goal to combat substance use 

disorder, including opioid misuse, in high-risk rural communities by strengthening the capacity to address 

prevention, treatment and/or recovery.

# 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender.
I )IS1 ISS; Opinion issued February 7, 2013

In The

(!Ln1r1 rif \PIJIat!

3fiftI! hstrirt uf rxa at 1a11a6

No. 0512-0i044-CV

ANTOINI FLET(i IFR, Appellant

V.

FE1)IRAL hOME LOAN MORTCACE CORP., Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-12-02202-C

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Beibre (‘hieCiustice Wright and Justices Lang-Miers and Le\\ iS

Opinion by Chief Justice Wright

The lime lijr filing appellant’s brief has expired. 13v postcard dated January 4. 2013. we

notified appellant the time br filing his brief had expired and directed appellant to file his brief

and an extension motion within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so would

result in the dismissal of this appeal. To date. appellant has not tiled his brief, an extension

motion, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEx. R. Aip. P.38. 8(a)(l); 42.3(h),(c).

_

ZErz - z 44z

(AROLN WRCI1f

CIJIEFJUST4CE

l2l044F.P05
Qtiiiii iii 4wa1

Fift1! thUrirt tf i?txas at Da1ta

JUDGMENT

ANTOINE FLETCI WR, Appellant

No. O5’12O1O44C\’ V

FEI)ERA1, IION’IE I OAN MOWFGAGE

CORP. Appeilce

On Appeal from the County Court at Law

No. 3, Dallas County. Texas

F naT Court CausL No (CI2-02202-C

Opinion delivered by ChiefJustice Wright.

.Justices LangMiers and Lewis participating.

In accordance v ith this Court’s opinion of this date. this appeal is I)ISM ISSEI).

It is ORDK REI) that appellee Fi:DLRAL I IOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP. recover

its costs of this ipp. ii horn tppJl tnt AN I OIN I I Lf I ( I IF R

Judgment entered Lebruarv 7. 201 3

\ROI YN \\ RICH I’

(11111 .11 ,

11(1
NO. 07-09-0123-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

JUNE 17, 2009

______________________________

IN THE INTEREST OF D.C.R. AND K.S.R., CHILDREN

_________________________________

FROM THE 286TH DISTRICT COURT OF HOCKLEY COUNTY;

NO. 00-02-17934; HONORABLE PAT PHELAN, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Rebecca Michele Willis, perfected this appeal from the trial court’s order

modifying the child support obligation of Appellee, Israel Loa Reyna. Pending before this

Court is Willis’s Motion for Voluntary Dismissal in which she represents that she no longer

wishes to pursue this appeal. The Certificate of Conference reflects that Reyna agrees

with the merits of the motion. No decision of this Court having been delivered, we grant
2

the motion and dismiss the appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). No motion for rehearing

will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

Patrick A. Pirtle

 Justice
Filed by Bowne Pure Compliance





Exhibit 4.11.3




JOINDER AGREEMENT 




This Joinder Agreement (“Joinder Agreement”) is executed by Mark Alsentzer, (“Joinder Party”)
as of this 30th day of August 2007.



Background




Pure Earth, Inc. (“PEI) and Dynamic Decisions Strategic Opportunities, a Cayman Islands
corporation (“Seller”) are parties to a certain Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of August 17,
2007 (the “Stock Purchase Agreement”). Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined,
shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Stock Purchase Agreement. The Stock Purchase
Agreement contemplates that by execution of a Joinder Agreement, Joinder Party may become a party
to the Stock Purchase Agreement as a “Buyer ” thereunder to the extent of such Buyer’s Committed
Amount.



NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the undersigned, WITH THE INTENT TO BE
LEGALLY BOUND HEREBY, agrees as follows:



1. The undersigned Joinder Party hereby agrees to become a party to the Stock Purchase
Agreement, and agrees to be bound by and comply with all of the terms and conditions of, and be
entitled to all of the rights and benefits arising from, the Stock Purchase Agreement relating to
“Buyers” (as such term is defined in the Stock Purchase Agreement).



2. The undersigned Joinder Party hereby acknowledges receipt of a copy of the Stock Purchase
Agreement, and that Joinder Party has read and understands the Stock Purchase Agreement.



3. The undersigned Joinder Party hereby acknowledges and agrees that an executed copy of this
Joinder Agreement shall be attached to the Stock Purchase Agreement to evidence the undersigned’s
undertakings hereunder, and that an executed copy of this Joinder Agreement shall be given to each
person who is a party to the Stock Purchase Agreement as well as to the Escrow Agent.



4. The undersigned Joinder Party hereby agrees that its Committed Amount is fifty thousand
(50,000) shares of the PEI Stock.



5. The name, address, telephone number and contact person of Joinder Party’s broker that will
coordinate the Delivery versus Payment transaction for Joinder Party’s Committed Amount is as
follows:



Merrill Lynch

2611 East Oakland PK BLVD

Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33306

Attn:          Debbie Allen     DTC#5198          

Tel: 954-537-3930

Fax: 954-449-6076

Francis.ciabattoni@morganstanley.com




6. This Joinder Agreement shall be governed by, construed and enforced in accordance with the
laws of the State of Delaware, without giving effect to principles of conflicts of laws.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned Joinder Party has executed this Joinder Agreement as of
the date first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	JOINDER PARTY	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:
	/s/ Mark Alsentzer	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Mark Alsentzer	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	PURE EARTH, INC.
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Addrress

	 	1330 Sabal Palm Drive.
	 	 	 	By:
	 	/s/ Brent Kopenhaver
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Brent Kopenhaver, Chief Financial Officer
	 

	 	Boca Raton, FL 33432
### §635b. Capitalization of Bank; method of capital stock payments; public-debt transactions; issuance of stock certificates

The Export-Import Bank of the United States shall have a capital stock of $1,000,000,000 subscribed by the United States. Certificates evidencing stock ownership of the United States shall be issued by the Bank to the President of the United States, or to such other person or persons as the President may designate from time to time, to the extent of payments made for the capital stock of the Bank.

(July 31, 1945, ch. 341, §4, 59 Stat. 528; Pub. L. 90–267, §1(a), Mar. 13, 1968, 82 Stat. 47; Pub. L. 98–181, title I [title VI, §620(c)], Nov. 30, 1983, 97 Stat. 1261; Pub. L. 102–429, title I, §121(b), Oct. 21, 1992, 106 Stat. 2198.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–429 inserted second sentence and struck out former second through last sentences which read as follows: "Payment for $1,000,000 of such capital stock shall be made by the surrender to the Bank for cancellation of the common stock issued prior to July 31, 1945, by the Bank and purchased by the United States. Payment for $174,000,000 of such capital stock shall be made by the surrender to the Bank for cancellation of the preferred stock heretofore issued by the Bank and purchased by the Reconstruction Finance Corporation. Payment for the $825,000,000 balance of such capital stock shall be subject to call at any time in whole or in part by the Board of Directors of the Bank. For the purpose of making payments of such balance, the Secretary of the Treasury is authorized to use as a public-debt transaction the proceeds of any securities issued after July 31, 1945, under chapter 31 of title 31, and the purposes for which securities may be issued under that chapter are extended to include such purpose. Payment under this section of the subscription of the United States to the Bank and repayments thereof shall be treated as public-debt transactions of the United States. Certificates evidencing stock ownership of the United States shall be issued by the Bank to the President of the United States, or to such other person or persons as the President may designate from time to time, to the extent of the common and preferred stock surrendered and other payments made for the capital stock of the Bank under this section."

1983—Pub. L. 98–181 substituted "the President" for "he" before "may designate".

1968—Pub. L. 90–267 changed name of "Export-Import Bank of Washington" to "Export-Import Bank of the United States".
# C_2013252EN.01002902.xml

| 31.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 11 July 2013 — SA.PAR. v OHIM — Salini Costruttori (GRUPPO SALINI)

(Case T-321/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community word mark GRUPPO SALINI - Bad faith - Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2013/C 252/46

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: SA.PAR. Srl (Rome, Italy) (represented by: A. Masetti Zannini de Concina, M. Bussoletti and G. Petrocchi, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Mannucci and P. Bullock, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Salini Costruttori SpA (Rome, Italy) (represented by: C. Bellomunno and S. Troilo, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 April 2010 (Case R 219/2009-1), relating to invalidity proceedings between Salini Costruttori SpA and SA.PAR. Srl

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders SA.PAR. Srl to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders SA.PAR. Srl to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 260, 25.9.2010.

1

---
1 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-30716

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GLENN T. HAMPTON, II,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 91-CR-50100-1

- - - - - - - - - -

December 1, 1998

Before DAVIS, DUHÉ, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

Glenn Hampton appeals the district court’s sentence of 24

months’ imprisonment for violating the terms of his supervised

release. His arguments are unavailing because the district court

was not obligated to follow the recommendations contained in

U.S.S.G. § 7B1.4. United States v. Escamilla, 70 F.3d 835, 835

(5th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1127 (1996). Moreover,

any error which may have occurred does not rise to the level of
No. 

-2-

plain error. United States v. Calverley, 37 F.3d 160, 162-64

(5th Cir. 1994) (en banc). The sentence is AFFIRMED.
Dolan Chemical Laboratory 4001 Bixby Road Groveport, OH 43125 T: 614-836-4221, Audinet 210-4221 F: 614-836-4168, Audinet 210-4168 http://aepenv/labs 

### Water Analysis Form REP-703 Rev. 0, 4/2012



### Location: Mountaineer Plant Report Date: 12/27/2012 Sample Number: 125386-001 Date Collected:12/18/2012 09:00 Date Received:12/19/2012 

### Trip Blank Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg < 0.2 0.5 TLT EPA 1631E 0.2 12/26/2012 U 

### Sample Number: 125386-002 Date Collected:12/18/2012 09:00 Date Received:12/19/2012 

### Field Blank Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg < 0.2 0.5 TLT EPA 1631E 0.2 12/26/2012 U 

### Sample Number: 125386-003 Date Collected:12/18/2012 09:00 Date Received:12/19/2012 

## Plant Outfall #001 Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 5.6 2 TLT EPA 1631E 0.8 12/26/2012 

### Sample Number: 125386-004 Date Collected:12/19/2012 08:55 Date Received:12/19/2012 

## Plant Outfall #001 Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 5.5 2 TLT EPA 1631E 0.8 12/26/2012 

### Sample Number: 125386-005 Date Collected: 12/18/2012 09:10 Date Received:12/19/2012 

### Bioreactor Effluent Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 3.0 1 TLT EPA 1631E 0.4 12/26/2012 

### Sample Number: 125386-006 Date Collected: 12/19/2012 09:15 Date Received:12/19/2012 

### Bioreactor Effluent Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 3.6 1 TLT EPA 1631E 0.4 12/26/2012

Mountaineer Plant, 125386 Page 1 of 2

### Location: Mountaineer Plant Report Date: 12/27/2012

Sample Number: 125386-007 Date Collected:12/18/2012 09:10 Date Received:12/19/2012 

### CPS Effluent Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 20 50 TLT EPA 1631E 20 12/26/2012 J 

### Sample Number: 125386-008 Date Collected:12/19/2012 09:15 Date Received:12/19/2012 

## CPS Effluent Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 30 50 TLT EPA 1631E 20 12/26/2012 J

THIS TEST REPORT RELATES ONLY TO THE ITEMS TESTED AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE LABORATORY. ALL TEST RESULTS MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACCREDITING AUTHORITY, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. U: Analyte was analyzed and not detected at or above adjusted Method Detection Limit J: Analyte was positively identified, though the quantitation was below Reporting Limit. Brian Snyder, Chemist II Email bssnyder@aep.com Tel. 614-836-4224 Fax 614-836-4168 Audinet 210-4224

Mountaineer Plant, 125386 Page 2 of 2
### **CHAPTER 94—PRIVACY**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—DISCLOSURE OF NONPUBLIC PERSONAL INFORMATION

Sec.
6801.
Protection of nonpublic personal information.
6802.
Obligations with respect to disclosures of personal information.
6803.
Disclosure of institution privacy policy.
6804.
Rulemaking.
6805.
Enforcement.
6806.
Relation to other provisions.
6807.
Relation to State laws.
6808.
Study of information sharing among financial affiliates.
6809.
Definitions.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—FRAUDULENT ACCESS TO FINANCIAL INFORMATION

6821.
Privacy protection for customer information of financial institutions.
6822.
Administrative enforcement.
6823.
Criminal penalty.
6824.
Relation to State laws.
6825.
Agency guidance.
6826.
Reports.
6827.
Definitions.
#### § 91.11 Export isolation.

If an importing country requires export isolation for livestock, such isolation must occur before the animals may be moved to a port of embarkation, and both the manner in which this isolation occurs and the facility at which it occurs must meet the requirements specified by the importing country.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1
 
                             CAMBRIDGE HEART, INC.
 
                       COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                            FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                          -------------------------------------
                                             1995         1996         1997
                                          -----------  -----------  -----------
<S>                                       <C>          <C>          <C>
Net loss................................. $(2,496,958) $(4,034,879) $(6,047,619)
Weighted average shares outstanding:
 Shares attributable to common stock
  outstanding............................   3,126,569    6,073,865   10,451,560
                                          -----------  -----------  -----------
Net loss per share--basic and diluted.... $    (0.80)  $     (0.66) $     (0.58)
                                          ===========  ===========  ===========
</TABLE>
 
  Potential common stock, including options, warrants and convertible preferred
stock, have been excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share,
as their effect would be anti-dilutive.
#### § 329.2 Method of detention; form of detention tag.

An authorized representative of the Secretary shall detain any article or livestock to be detained under this part, by affixing an official “U.S. Detained” tag (FSIS Form 8400-2) to such article or livestock.

[55 FR 47842, Nov. 16, 1990]
### §1707. Property report

#### (a) Contents of report

A property report relating to the lots in a subdivision shall contain such of the information contained in the statement of record, and any amendments thereto, as the Director may deem necessary, but need not include the documents referred to in paragraphs (7) to (11), inclusive, of section 1705 of this title. A property report shall also contain such other information as the Director may by rules or regulations require as being necessary or appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of purchasers.

#### (b) Promotional use

The property report shall not be used for any promotional purposes before the statement of record becomes effective and then only if it is used in its entirety. No person may advertise or represent that the Director approves or recommends the subdivision or the sale or lease of lots therein. No portion of the property report shall be underscored, italicized, or printed in larger or bolder type than the balance of the statement unless the Director requires or permits it.

(Pub. L. 90–448, title XIV, §1408, Aug. 1, 1968, 82 Stat. 594; Pub. L. 111–203, title X, §1098A(1), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 2105.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2010—Pub. L. 111–203 substituted "Director" for "Secretary" wherever appearing.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2010 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 111–203 effective on the designated transfer date, see section 1100H of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as a note under section 552a of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### Effective Date

Section effective upon the expiration of two hundred and seventy days after Aug. 1, 1968, see section 1423 of Pub. L. 90–448, set out as a note under section 1701 of this title.
# C_2013147EN.01001601.xml

| 25.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 147/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 147/16

---

Judgment of the General Court of 11 April 2013 — CBp Carbon Industries v OHIM (CARBON GREEN)

(Case T-294/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - International registration designating the European Community - Community word mark CARBON GREEN - Absolute grounds for refusal - Descriptive character - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2013/C 147/26

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: CBp Carbon Industries, Inc. (Tortola, British Virgin Islands, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister, and J. Fish, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 April 2010 (Case R 1361/2009-1), concerning an application for registration of the word sign CARBON GREEN as a Community trade mark

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders CBp Carbon Industries, Inc. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders CBp Carbon Industries, Inc. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 260, 25.9.2010.

1

---
### §3422. Applicability to Securities and Exchange Commission

Except as provided in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.], this chapter shall apply with respect to the Securities and Exchange Commission.

(Pub. L. 95–630, title XI, §1122, Nov. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 3710; Pub. L. 96–433, §2, Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1855.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Securities Exchange Act of 1934, referred to in text, is act June 6, 1934, ch. 404, 48 Stat. 881, which is classified principally to chapter 2B (§78a et seq.) of Title 15, Commerce and Trade. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 78a of Title 15 and Tables.

#### Amendments

1980—Pub. L. 96–433 substituted provision making this chapter applicable with respect to the Commission, except as provided in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, for provision exempting the Commission from this chapter for a period of two years from November 10, 1978.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1980 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 96–433 effective Nov. 10, 1980, see section 5(b) of Pub. L. 96–433, set out as a note under section 78u of Title 15, Commerce and Trade.

#### Effective Date

Section effective upon the expiration of 120 days after Nov. 10, 1978, see section 2101 of Pub. L. 95–630, set out as a note under section 375b of this title.
### §278a. Repealed. Pub. L. 88–611, §4(a)(1), Oct. 2, 1964, 78 Stat. 991

Section, act Mar. 3, 1901, ch. 872, §11, as added July 22, 1950, ch. 486, §2, 64 Stat. 373; amended Aug. 3, 1956, ch. 906, §2, 70 Stat. 959; Sept. 2, 1958, Pub. L. 85–890, §2, 72 Stat. 1712, provided for acceptance of gifts and bequests. See sections 1522 and 1523 of this title.