1 

### Ogulei, David

From: **Mooney, John** Sent: **Monday, March 30, 2015 8:07 AM** To: **Damico, Genevieve; Ogulei, David** Subject: **FW: Response to comments in Docket ID No. EPA-R05-O AR-2014-0280**  Attachments: **CES Response to Veolia Comments to replace EPA-R05- OAR-2014-0280-0113_Mar 27 2015**  **REVISED.pdf**

From: Andrea Geiger [mailto:andreag@cooperenvironmental. com]
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 7:34 PM

To: Mooney, John Subject: RE: Response to comments in Docket ID No. EPA-R05- OAR-2014-0280

Hello Mr. Mooney,

I have attached the revised version of the document to replace the February 18, 2015-posted commentary (with erroneous reference removed; ID# E PA-R05-OAR-2014-0280-0113). If there is a different process to go through to revise the currently posted document, please let me know. I appreciate your help with making this corre ction. The only changes are the removal of two sentences from page 3 and a reference in the Wo rks Cited section on page 14. Let me know what else you may need from me to make this revisio n.



### Thanks, Andrea

971-777-4892 andreag@cooperenvironmental.com

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail and any attachm ents may contain confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not th e intended recipient, any distribution, copying, or use of this e-mail or its attachments is prohibited. If you received this message in err or, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete this message and any copies. Thank you.

From: Andrea Geiger [mailto:andreag@cooperenvironmental. com]
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 9:52 AM

To: mooney.john@epa.gov Subject: Re: Response to comments in Docket ID No. EPA-R05- OAR-2014-0280 Importance: High

Dear Mr. Mooney,

I will need to correct a reference in the submiss ion I sent in on February 10th (see email below). W hat do I need to do to make corrections? In any case, we will need to have the current version of our February 10, 2015 commentary included in the online docket removed as soon as possible. If we can get t hat document pulled, I will make the revisions and re-send it as soon as possible. Your help with this matter is greatly app reciated.

Kind Regards, Andrea Geiger
Senior Environmental Scientist Cooper Environmental Services, LLC2 971-777-4892

From: Andrea Geiger < andreag@cooperenvironmental.com > Organization: Cooper Environmental Services, LLC

Date: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 6:05 PM

To: < mooney.john@epa.gov > Cc: 'Krag Petterson' < kragp@cooperenvironmental.com >, John Cooper < johnc@cooperenvironmental.com >,

< Czerniak.george@Epa.gov > Subject: Response to comments in Docket ID No. EPA-R05-OAR-2 014-0280



### Dear Mr. Mooney,

Following our review of the various commentary subm itted with regard to the Draft Title V CAA Permit f or Veolia ES Technical Solutions, there appeared to be a number of technical issues that required clarification wit h regard to the multi-metals CEMS requirement. The at tached document, prepared by Cooper Environmental Services, LLC, is intended to explain technical asp ects of the Xact 640 Multi-Metals CEMS and dispel s ome inaccuracies we found in the comments pertaining to our instrument and transport system. We understan d that no response to this submittal will be provided to u s by the EPA; nonetheless, we consider the attached document important in providing support of the tech nical and scientific integrity of our multi- metals monitoring instrumentation and in supporting the validity of E PA’s multi-metal monitoring requirement in the draf t permit.

If you or your colleagues should have any questions pertaining to the attached document or our Decembe r 19, 2014 commentary to Veolia’s draft Title V Permit, p lease contact me using the information provided in my signature block below. We truly appreciate your tim e and attention to our contribution in this area.

Sincerely,