alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 505 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 505

 To ensure due process protections of individuals in the United States 
 against unlawful detention based solely on a protected characteristic.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 14, 2019

  Ms. Duckworth (for herself, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. Booker, Mr. Durbin, 
Mrs. Feinstein, Ms. Harris, Ms. Hirono, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Markey, Mrs. 
 Murray, Ms. Rosen, Mr. Schatz, Ms. Smith, and Ms. Warren) introduced 
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 
                            on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To ensure due process protections of individuals in the United States 
 against unlawful detention based solely on a protected characteristic.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Korematsu-Takai Civil Liberties 
Protection Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST UNLAWFUL DETENTION.

    Section 4001 of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following:
    ``(b) Prohibition on Detention Based on Protected 
Characteristics.--
            ``(1) In general.--No individual may be imprisoned or 
        otherwise detained based solely on an actual or perceived 
        protected characteristic of the individual.
            ``(2) Definition.--In this subsection, the term `protected 
        characteristic' includes each of the following:
                    ``(A) Race.
                    ``(B) Ethnicity.
                    ``(C) National origin.
                    ``(D) Religion.
                    ``(E) Sex.
                    ``(F) Gender identity.
                    ``(G) Sexual orientation.
                    ``(H) Disability.
                    ``(I) Any additional characteristic that the 
                Attorney General determines to be a protected 
                characteristic.
            ``(3) Rule of construction.--Nothing in this subsection 
        shall be construed to allow the Attorney General to remove a 
        characteristic described in subparagraphs (A) through (H) of 
        paragraph (2) from the definition of the term `protected 
        characteristic' under this subsection.''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2007129EN.01002802.xml

| 9.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/28

---

Action brought on 23 April 2007 — Campos Valls v Council

(Case F-39/07)

(2007/C 129/49)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Manuel Campos Valls (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, J.-N. Louis, A. Coolen and E. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | annul the decision of the Appointing Authority (AIPN) to reject the applicant's candidature for the post of head of the Spanish Language Unit of DG A, Directorate 3 — Translation and Document Production — Language Service and the decision appointing another candidate to that post; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Appointing Authority (AIPN) to reject the applicant's candidature for the post of head of the Spanish Language Unit of DG A, Directorate 3 — Translation and Document Production — Language Service and the decision appointing another candidate to that post;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of his application, the applicant relies on a single plea based on infringement of vacancy notice No 60/06, manifest error of assessment and infringement of Article 45 of the Staff Regulations, inasmuch as the candidate selected to fill the position does not have, unlike the applicant, the technical knowledge of translation required by the vacancy notice. In particular, the argument relied on by the Council that that knowledge had to be assessed in the light of the staff management functions which the head of unit has to carry out fails to have regard to the vacancy notice.

---
### §141. Short title

This chapter may be cited as the "China Trade Act, 1922."

(Sept. 19, 1922, ch. 346, §1, 42 Stat. 849.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning act Sept. 19, 1922, ch. 346, 42 Stat. 849. The Act (except sections 21 to 27) is classified to this chapter. Sections 21 to 27 of the Act amended title II of the Revenue Act of 1921, which was repealed by section 1100 of the Revenue Act of 1924 (43 Stat. 352).
Together, America Prospers

Community Facilities Technical Assistance 

and Training (TAT) 

What does this 

program do?

USDA Rural Development 

provides TAT grants to eligible 

public bodies and private, 

nonprofit organizations (such as 

states, counties, cities, townships, 

incorporated towns, villages, 

boroughs, authorities, districts, 

and Tribes located on Federal 

or state reservations) to provide 

technical assistance and/or 

training in support of essential 

community facilities programs.

In turn, this technical assistance 

and training helps grantees 

identify and plan for community 

facility needs in their area. Once 

these needs are pinpointed, the 

grantee can find additional public 

and private financial resources.

Who may apply 

for this program?

• Public bodies

• Nonprofit organizations

• Federally-recognized Tribes

What is an eligible area?

Rural areas including cities, villages, 

townships, towns and Federallyrecognized Tribal Lands outside 

the boundaries of a city of 20,000 

or more.

How may funds be used?

• Assist communities in identifying 

and planning for community 

facility needs

• Identify resources to finance 

community facility needs from 

public and private sources

• Prepare reports and surveys 

necessary to request financial 

assistance to develop 

community facilities

• Prepare applications for financial 

assistance from Rural Development

• Improve administrative and financial 

operations management

• Assist with other areas of need 

identified by the Secretary 

of Agriculture

What kind of funding is available?

• Maximum grant award is $150,000

• Grant funds are limited and 

are awarded through a 

competitive process

Are matching funds required?

• Matching funds are not required, 

but preference is given to applications 

with cash matching funds.

• In-kind contributions cannot be used 

as matching funds

• Partnerships with other Federal, 

state, local, private and nonprofit 

entities are encouraged

How do we get started?

• Applications are accepted on an 

annual basis through a Notice of 

Funding Availability (NOFA) in the 

Federal Register

• Program resources are available 

online (includes forms needed, 

guidance, certifications etc.)

Who can answer questions?

Contact your local RD office.

What law governs this program?

7 CFR 3570 Subpart F; Code of 

Federal Regulation; 2 CFR 200; 

and Guidelines announced in NOFA, 

published in the Federal Register.

NOTE: Because citations and other information may be subject to change, please 

always consult the program instructions listed in the section above titled “What Law 

Governs this Program?” You may also contact your State Office CF TAT Contact for 

assistance. Find additional forms, resources, and program information at rd.usda.gov. 

USDA is an equal opportunity provider,employer and lender.

Last updated March 2021
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 23-50380

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Oscar Mendez-Carrillo, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 7:22-CR-291-1

______________________________

Before Smith, Higginson, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges. 

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Oscar Mendez-Carrillo has 

moved to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 

2011). Mendez-Carrillo has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s 

brief, relevant portions of the record, and Mendez-Carrillo’s response. 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 19, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 23-50380 Document: 43-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/19/2024
No. 23-50380

2

We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 23-50380 Document: 43-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/19/2024
§ 115.22 Policies to ensure investigation of allegations and appropriate agency oversight. ( a ) The agency shall establish an agency protocol, and shall require each facility to establish a facility protocol, to ensure that each allegation of sexual abuse is investigated by the agency or facility, or referred to an appropriate investigative authority. The agency shall ensure that an administrative or criminal investigation is completed for all allegations of sexual abuse.
( b ) The agency shall ensure that the agency and facility protocols required by paragraph (a) of this section, include a description of responsibilities of the agency, the facility, and any other investigating entities; and require the documentation and maintenance, for at least five years, of all reports and referrals of allegations of sexual abuse.
( c ) The agency shall post its protocols on its Web site; each facility shall also post its protocols on its Web site, if it has one, or otherwise make the protocol available to the public.
( d ) Each facility protocol shall ensure that all allegations are promptly reported to the agency as described in paragraphs (e) and (f) of this section, and, unless the allegation does not involve potentially criminal behavior, are promptly referred for investigation to an appropriate law enforcement agency with the legal authority to conduct criminal investigations. A facility may separately, and in addition to the above reports and referrals, conduct its own investigation.
( e ) When a detainee, prisoner, inmate, or resident of the facility in which an alleged detainee victim is housed is alleged to be the perpetrator of detainee sexual abuse, the facility shall ensure that the incident is promptly reported to the Joint Intake Center, the ICE Office of Professional Responsibility or the DHS Office of Inspector General, as well as the appropriate ICE Field Office Director, and, if it is potentially criminal, referred to an appropriate law enforcement agency having jurisdiction for investigation.
( f ) When a staff member, contractor, or volunteer is alleged to be the perpetrator of detainee sexual abuse, the facility shall ensure that the incident is promptly reported to the Joint Intake Center, the ICE Office of Professional Responsibility or the DHS Office of Inspector General, as well as to the appropriate ICE Field Office Director, and to the local government entity or contractor that owns or operates the facility. If the incident is potentially criminal, the facility shall ensure that it is promptly referred to an appropriate law enforcement agency having jurisdiction for investigation.
( g ) The agency shall ensure that all allegations of detainee sexual abuse are promptly reported to the PSA Coordinator and to the appropriate offices within the agency and within DHS to ensure appropriate oversight of the investigation.
( h ) The agency shall ensure that any alleged detainee victim of sexual abuse that is criminal in nature is provided timely access to U nonimmigrant status information.
**CERTIFICATION**

**Pursuant to section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,United States Code)**

Pursuant to section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer ofMillicom International Cellular, S.A. a company incorporated under the laws ofthe Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg (the *“Company”*),hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for theyear ended *December 31, 2005* (the *“Report”*) of the Company fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.
| Date:  | May 1, 2006 |   | BY     | /s/ MARC BEULS            |
|--------|------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------|
|   |             | Name:  |   | Marc Beuls                |
|   |             | Title: |   | *Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----
§ 146.22 Participation. ( a ) Participating commercial table-egg layer flocks shall comply with the applicable general provisions of subpart A of this part and the special provisions of subpart B of this part.
( b ) Commercial table-egg laying premises with fewer than 75,000 birds are exempt from the special provisions of subpart B of this part.
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas November 2, 2020 No. 04-20-00392-CV Sherry CAGLE n/k/a Sherry Schwartz,

Appellant
v. Mario CUELLAR , Norma Cuellar, James Donald Cagle, and Hannah Funding LLC., Appellees From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018-CI-01910 Honorable Laura Salinas, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R Appellant’s brief is due on November 2, 2020. On October 30, 2020, appellant filed an unopposed motion requesting a forty-five day extension of time to file her brief. After consideration, we GRANTappellant’s motion and ORDER appellant’s brief due by December 17, 2020
.

_________________________________ Beth Watkins, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 2nd day of November, 2020.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
§ 126.25 Oral argument. ( a ) Upon receipt of a request from any party contained in a brief or in a motion, or on its own initiative, a TSOB Review Panel may order the parties to present oral argument. The Review Panel orders oral argument if it determines that oral argument will contribute substantially to the development of an issue on appeal.
( b ) A TSOB Review Panel has discretion, within the requirements of all relevant statutory and regulatory provisions for information security, to choose the method and location of oral argument. The Review Panel will consider expense and inconvenience to the parties, the importance of information security, the quality and reliability of available communication technology, and concern for the efficient administration of proceedings when establishing the method and location of oral argument.
( c ) A TSOB Review Panel has discretion to structure and establish procedural rules for oral argument via order served on the parties. Such rules may include time limits for argument and the order in which parties present argument.
( d ) Classified information, SSI, or other protected information may not be disclosed during oral argument. A TSOB Review Panel may hold ex parte proceedings to allow for the presentation of classified information, SSI, or other protected information.
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350****MEMORY PHARMACEUTICALS CORP.****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     Each of the undersigned officers of Memory Pharmaceuticals Corp. (the “Company”) herebycertifies to his knowledge that the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period endedJune 30, 2006 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.   /s/ James R. Sulat   JAMES R. SULAT  President and Chief Executive Officer  (Principal Executive Officer)  August 14, 2006     /s/ Joseph M. Donabauer   JOSEPH M. DONABAUER  Vice President & Controller  (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)  August 14, 2006   * A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 has been provided to Memory Pharmaceuticals Corp. and will be retained by MemoryPharmaceuticals Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest. This written statement accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission, and will not be incorporated by reference into anyfiling of Memory Pharmaceuticals Corp. under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
29
Certification Pursuant to Sections 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002

Pursuant  to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b)  of  Section  1350, Chapter 63 or Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned  officers  of  Proteo,  Inc. (the "Company") does hereby certify, to
such  officer's  knowledge,  that:

The  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the three month period ended March 31,
2003  of  the  Company  fully  complies,  in  all  material  respects,  with the
requirements  of  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided  by  Proteo, Inc. and will be retained by Proteo, Inc. and furnished to
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or  its  staff  upon  request.

                                   /s/ Joerg Alte
                                   Joerg Alte
                                   Chief  Executive  Officer
                                   Chief  Financial  Officer

May 20, 2003
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Invites Applications for Funding to Support Rural Economic Development Planning

WASHINGTON, Aug. 17, 2018 – Assistant to the Secretary for Rural Development Anne Hazlett announced 

today that USDA is seeking applications to provide cooperative agreement funding through the Rural Economic 

Development Innovation (REDI) initiative.

The REDI initiative offers an opportunity for eligible partners to expand capacity for small and rural towns to 

harness regional assets, create economic development plans, and implement those plans. USDA plans to award 

up to $750,000 in competitive cooperative agreement funds in Fiscal Year 2018.

Eligible applicants must demonstrate a national structure and/or capacity to deliver and support multiple rural 

planning activities across the country. Additionally, eligible organizations must meet a matching fund 

requirement that is at least equal to the amount of the cooperative agreement award.

This funding opportunity will be administered by USDA’s Rural Development Innovation Center.

Applications must be submitted September 5, 2018. Applicants who have been selected for funding will 

receive a letter of official notification and will be awarded a cooperative agreement authorized under 7 USC 

2204b(b)(4).

Applicants should plan their projects based on a start date of Sept. 30, 2018. Projects must be completed 

within 24 months.

For additional details, please see page 41046 of the Aug. 17 Federal Register.

USDA encourages application submissions that will support recommendations made in the Report to the 

President of the United States from the Task Force on Agriculture and Rural Prosperity (PDF, 5.4 MB) to help 

improve life in rural America. Applicants are also encouraged to consider projects that provide measurable 

results in helping rural communities build robust and sustainable economies through strategic investments in 

infrastructure, partnerships, and innovation.

Key strategies include:

Achieving e-Connectivity for Rural America

Developing the rural economy

Harnessing technological innovation

Supporting a rural workforce

Improving quality of life

#
EXHIBIT 32.2
 Written Statement of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the
 Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (a)
    
    the Form 10-Q Report of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 filed on the date
hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (b)
    
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ PAUL M. PARRISHPaul  M. ParrishChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)