alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 203.19 Statement with respect to packers engaging in the business of livestock dealers or buying agencies. ( a ) In its administration of the Packers and Stockyards Act, the Department has sought to prevent conflicts of interest and to maintain open and fair competition in the livestock and meat packing industries. The ownership or operation of livestock dealers or buying agencies by packers, under some circumstances, may result in violations of the Packers and Stockyards Act.
( b ) Traditionally, livestock dealers and buying agencies purchase livestock for resale or to fill orders for farmers, ranchers, producers, other livestock firms and packers. When a livestock dealer or buying agency is owned or operated by a packer, and when such packer is also buying livestock for its own operational requirements, there is a potential conflict of interest. Furthermore, the purchase and sale of livestock by meat packers may result in control of markets and prices which could adversely affect both livestock producers, competing packers, and consumers.
( c ) Arrangements between packers and dealers or buying agencies which do not normally create a conflict of interest or result in a restraint of competition include: ( 1 ) Operations utilizing different species or classes of livestock;
( 2 ) Operations where the business activities are widely separated geographically; and
( 3 ) Operations where tie-in purchases or sales are not involved. Packers contemplating engaging in the business of a livestock dealer or a buying agency are encouraged to consult with the PSD prior to the commencement of such activities.
( d ) In the event a packer/dealer or a packer/buying agency arrangement appears to give rise to a violation of the Act, an investigation will be made on a case-by-case basis and, where warranted, appropriate action will be taken.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0580-0015) (7 U.S.C. 228, 228b, 222, 15 U.S.C. 46)
[49 FR 32845, Aug. 17, 1984; 54 FR 26349, June 23, 1989, as amended at 68 FR 75388, Dec. 31, 2003; 84 FR 45648, Aug. 30, 2019]
§ 381.123 Official inspection mark; official establishment number. The immediate container of every inspected and passed poultry product shall bear: ( a ) The official inspection legend; and
( b ) The official establishment number of the official establishment in which the product was processed under inspection and placed as follows: ( 1 ) Within the official inspection legend in the form required by subpart M of this part; or
( 2 ) Outside the official inspection legend elsewhere on the exterior of the container or its labeling, e.g., the lid of a can, if shown in a prominent and legible manner in a size sufficient to insure easy visibility and recognition and accompanied by the prefix “P”; or
( 3 ) Off the exterior of the container, e.g., on a metal clip used to close casings or bags, or on the back of a paper label of a canned product, or on other packaging or labeling in the container, e.g., on aluminum pans and trays placed within containers, when a statement of its location is printed contiguous to the official inspection legend, such as “Plant No. on Package Closure” or “Plant No. on Pan”, if shown in a prominent and legible manner in a size sufficient to ensure easy visibility and recognition; or
( 4 ) On an insert label placed under a transparent covering if clearly visible and legible and accompanied by the prefix “P”.
[47 FR 29515, July 7, 1982]
#### § 122.3 Application for permits.

The Secretary may issue, at his discretion, a permit as specified in § 122.2 when proper safeguards are set up as provided in § 122.2 to protect the public. Application for such a permit shall be made in advance of shipment, and each permit shall specify the name and address of the consignee, the true name and character of each of the organisms or vectors involved, and the use to which each will be put.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0015)

[23 FR 10065, Dec. 23, 1958. Redesignated at 31 FR 81, Jan. 5, 1966 and amended at 48 FR 57473, Dec. 30, 1983; 59 FR 67134, Dec. 29, 1994]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF HARBINGER CORPORATION FOR THE NINE MONTHS
ENDED SEPTEMBER-30-1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          28,830
<SECURITIES>                                    31,367
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,141
<ALLOWANCES>                                       864
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                74,897
<PP&E>                                          19,355
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,843
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 121,254
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,454
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     23,089
<COMMON>                                       157,449
<OTHER-SE>                                    (93,626)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   121,254
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                52,474
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,265
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                30,839
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,099)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,099)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,099)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.31)


</TABLE>
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender.

STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Seeks Applications for Loans and Grants to Support Rural Microenterprises

WASHINGTON, Dec. 16, 2020 – United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Deputy Under Secretary

for Rural Development Bette Brand today invited applications for loan and grants to support rural 

microenterprises. 

The funding is being provided through USDA’s Rural Microentrepreneur Assistance Program (RMAP). 

RMAP provides loans and grants to a non-profit entity, tribe or institution of higher education as a

Microenterprise Development Organization (MDO) to establish revolving loan funds to provide loans to rural 

microloan borrowers and micro entrepreneurs, or to provide training and technical assistance to micro 

entrepreneurs. To be eligible for a loan from an MDO, an ultimate recipient must be a business with 10 or fewer 

full-time employees and be located in a non-metropolitan rural area with a population of 50,000 or less.

USDA encourages applications that will support recommendations made in the Report to the President of the 

United States from the Task Force on Agriculture and Rural Prosperity (PDF, 5.4 MB) to help improve life in 

rural America. Applications are being accepted in the Rural Development State Office where the project is 

located in either a paper or electronic format. 

Applicants are encouraged to consider projects that provide measurable results in helping rural communities 

build robust and sustainable economies through strategic investments. Key strategies include:

• Achieving e-Connectivity for Rural America

• Developing the Rural Economy

• Harnessing Technological Innovation

• Supporting a Rural Workforce

• Improving Quality of Life 

For additional information and for application deadlines, see page 81445 of the December 16 Federal Register.

If you’d like to subscribe to USDA Rural Development updates, visit our GovDelivery subscriber page. 

###
FAA-AM-78-3

PASSENGER FLOW RATES BETWEEN COMPARTMENTS:

STRAIGHT-SEGMENTED STAIRWAYS, SPIRAL STAIRWAYS, AND PASSAGEWAYS WITH

RESTRICTED VISION AND CHANGES OF ATTITUDE

D. W. Pollard

J. D. Garner

J. G. Blethrow

D. L. Lowrey

Civil Aeromedical Institute

Federal Aviation Administration

January 1978

Document is available to the public through the

National Technical Information Service,

Springfield, Virginia 22161

Prepared For

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

Office of Aviation Medicine

Washington, D.C. 20591
NOTICE

This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of

Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States

Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 24


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

                                    FORM 10-K

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That each person whose signature appears below
has made, constituted, and appointed, and by this instrument does make,
constitute, and appoint Robert M. Wilson, Glenn E. Morrical, and Robert T.
Wilson, and each of them, his true and lawful attorney, with full power of
substitution and re-substitution, to affix for him and in his name, as
attorney-in-fact his signature as a Director or Officer, or both, of ROBERDS,
INC., an Ohio corporation ("Company"), to the Company's annual report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998, pursuant to the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, and to any and all amendments and exhibits to that Form
10-K, and to any and all applications and other documents pertaining thereto,
giving and granting to each such attorney-in-fact full power and authority to do
and perform every act and thing whatsoever necessary to be done, as fully as the
undersigned might do or could do if personally present, and hereby ratifies and
confirms all that each of such attorneys-in-fact or any such substitute shall
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. This power of attorney shall
survive the death or disability of the undersigned.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Power of Attorney has been signed as of this 16th day
of February, 1999.



/s/ Melvin H. Baskin                    /s/ Jerry L. Kirby
---------------------------------       ------------------------------------
Melvin H. Baskin                        Jerry L. Kirby

/s/ Robert M. Wilson                    /s/ Gilbert P. Williamson
---------------------------------       ------------------------------------
Robert M. Wilson                        Gilbert P. Williamson

/s/ Carl E. Gunter                      /s/ Donald C. Wright
---------------------------------       ------------------------------------
Carl E. Gunter                          Donald C. Wright

/s/ Michael A. Bruns                    /s/ Howard W. Smith
---------------------------------       ------------------------------------
Michael A. Bruns                        Howard W. Smith

/s/ James F. Robeson
---------------------------------
James F. Robeson
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0001063018
<NAME>                        nvnzg#6d
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  30,183,133
<ALLOWANCES>                                   454,000
<INVENTORY>                                    5,774,552
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               37,533,209
<PP&E>                                         47,709,202
<DEPRECIATION>                                 10,322,357
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 250,413,049
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          20,187,128
<BONDS>                                        100,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       34,745,050
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,831,571)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   250,413,049
<SALES>                                        63,497,790
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               79,210,767
<CGS>                                          46,616,008
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  57,718,739
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               19,479,947
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             7,401,086
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,161,829)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,174,116
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,987,713)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,987,713)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0




</TABLE>
§ 381.73 Quarantine of diseased poultry. If live poultry, which is affected by any contagious disease which is transmissible to man, is brought into an official establishment, such poultry shall be segregated. The slaughtering of such poultry shall be deferred and the poultry shall be dealt with in one of the following ways: ( a ) If it is determined by a veterinary inspector that further handling of the poultry will not create a health hazard, the lot shall be slaughtered separately, subject to ante mortem and post mortem inspection pursuant to the regulations.
( b ) If it is determined by a veterinary inspector that further handling of the poultry will create a health hazard, such poultry may be released for treatment under the control of an appropriate State or Federal agency. If the circumstances are such that release for treatment is impracticable, a careful bird-by-bird ante mortem inspection shall be made, and all birds found to be, or which are suspected of being, affected with a contagious disease transmissible to man shall be condemned.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           2,046
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,605
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (747)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,474
<PP&E>                                         429,034
<DEPRECIATION>                                (30,206)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 451,206
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,743
<BONDS>                                        177,349
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            17
<OTHER-SE>                                     248,097
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   451,206
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                63,330
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 (33,966)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (100)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (10,992)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,272
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,272
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (3,331)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,491
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1313

To enable the State of Rhode Island to meet the criteria for recommendation

as an Area of Application to the Boston-Worcester-Lawrence; Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Maine, and Connecticut Federal locality pay area.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 1, 1999

Mr. REED (for himself and Mr. CHAFEE) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

A BILL

To enable the State of Rhode Island to meet the criteria

for recommendation as an Area of Application to the

Boston-Worcester-Lawrence; Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Maine, and Connecticut Federal locality pay area.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rhode Island Federal

5 Worker Fairness Act of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. FEDERAL LOCALITY PAY IN RHODE ISLAND.

7 Section 5304 of title 5, United States Code, is

8 amended by adding at the end the following:
2

•S 1313 IS

1 ‘‘(j) For purposes of this section, the 5 counties of

2 the State of Rhode Island (including Providence, Bristol,

3 Newport, Kent, and Washington counties) shall be consid4 ered as 1 county, adjacent to the Boston-Worcester-Law5 rence; Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Maine, and Con6 necticut locality pay area and the Hartford, Connecticut

7 locality pay area.’’.

Æ
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1324

To expand the boundaries of the Gettysburg National Military Park to include

the Wills House, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 1, 1999

Mr. SANTORUM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

A BILL

To expand the boundaries of the Gettysburg National Military Park to include the Wills House, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. GETTYSBURG NATIONAL MILITARY PARK

4 BOUNDARY REVISION.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1 of the Act entitled ‘‘An

6 Act to revise the boundary of the Gettysburg National

7 Military Park in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and

8 for other purposes’’ approved August 17, 1990 (16 U.S.C.

9 430g–4) is amended—
2

•S 1324 IS

1 (1) by redesignating subsection (b) as sub2 section (c);

3 (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the fol4 lowing:

5 ‘‘(b) ADDITIONAL LAND.—In addition to the land

6 identified in subsection (a), the park shall also include the

7 property commonly known as the Wills House located in

8 the Borough of Gettysburg and identified as Tract P02–

9 1 on the map entitled ‘Gettysburg National Military Park’

10 numbered MARO 305/80,011 Segment 2, and dated April

11 1981, revised May 14, 1999.’’; and

12 (3) in subsection (c) (as redesignated by para13 graph (1)), by striking ‘‘map referred to in sub14 section (a)’’ and inserting ‘‘maps referred to in sub15 sections (a) and (b)’’.

16 SEC. 2. ACQUISITION AND DISPOSAL OF LAND.

17 Section 2 of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to revise the

18 boundary of the Gettysburg National Military Park in the

19 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and for other purposes’’

20 approved August 17, 1990 (16 U.S.C. 430g–4) is amend21 ed by striking ‘‘1(b)’’ each place it appears and inserting

22 ‘‘1(c)’’.

Æ
#### § 417.1 Definitions.

For purposes of this part, the following definitions shall apply:

*Corrective action.* Procedures to be followed when a deviation occurs.

*Critical control point.* A point, step, or procedure in a food process at which control can be applied and, as a result, a food safety hazard can be prevented, eliminated, or reduced to acceptable levels.

*Critical limit.* The maximum or minimum value to which a physical, biological, or chemical hazard must be controlled at a critical control point to prevent, eliminate, or reduce to an acceptable level the occurrence of the identified food safety hazard.

*Food safety hazard.* Any biological, chemical, or physical property that may cause a food to be unsafe for human consumption.

*HACCP System.* The HACCP plan in operation, including the HACCP plan itself.

*Hazard.* SEE *Food Safety Hazard.*

*Preventive measure.* Physical, chemical, or other means that can be used to control an identified food safety hazard.

*Process-monitoring instrument.* An instrument or device used to indicate conditions during processing at a critical control point.

*Responsible establishment official.* The individual with overall authority on-site or a higher level official of the establishment.
#### In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Michael Ryan and Thomas Lenane, as Executors and Trustees of the Last Will and Testament of Mary M. Flynn, Deceased.

—Motion to dismiss appeal denied. Motion to file undertaking *mine yrro tune*granted, without costs. Present — Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor and Rich, JJ.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

XIOMARA JEANMILLETTE ORTIZ 

LANDAVERDE, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 19-72918 

Agency No. A215-815-766 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 17, 2022**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Xiomara Jeanmillette Ortiz Landaverde, a native and citizen of El Salvador, 

petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order 

dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying her 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAY 27 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 19-72918 

application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the 

Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).

Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial 

evidence the agency’s factual findings. Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-

85 (9th Cir. 2006). We deny the petition for review in part and dismiss it in part.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s conclusion that Ortiz Landaverde

failed to establish that she would be persecuted on account of a protected ground. 

See Zetino v. Holder, 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir. 2010) (an applicant’s “desire 

to be free from harassment by criminals motivated by theft or random violence by 

gang members bears no nexus to a protected ground”). Thus, her asylum and 

withholding of removal claims fail. Because this aspect of the agency’s 

determination is dispositive, we do not reach Ortiz Landaverde’s remaining 

contentions concerning those claims.

We lack jurisdiction to consider the contentions in Ortiz Landaverde’s brief 

regarding CAT protection because she did not exhaust them in the agency. Barron 

v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir. 2004).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.