alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1409 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1409

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce from 24 months to 
   12 months the holding period used to determine whether horses are 
             assets described in section 1231 of such Code.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 21, 1999

 Mr. McConnell (for himself and Mr. Bunning) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce from 24 months to 
   12 months the holding period used to determine whether horses are 
             assets described in section 1231 of such Code.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HOLDING PERIOD REDUCED TO 12 MONTHS FOR PURPOSES OF 
              DETERMINING WHETHER HORSES ARE SECTION 1231 ASSETS.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (A) of section 1231(b)(3) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to definition of property used 
in the trade or business) is amended by striking ``and horses''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1999.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 354.33 Authority of applicant.

Proof of the authority of any person applying for inspection service may be required at the discretion of the Administrator.
#### § 93.410 Movement from conveyances to quarantine station.

Platforms and chutes used for handling imported ruminants shall be cleaned and disinfected under APHIS supervision after being so used. The said ruminants shall not be unnecessarily moved over any highways nor allowed to come in contact with other animals, but shall be transferred from the conveyance to the quarantine grounds in boats, cars, or vehicles approved by the inspector in charge at the port of entry. Such cars, boats, or vehicles shall be cleaned and disinfected under APHIS supervision immediately after such use, by the carrier moving the same. The railway cars so used shall be either cars reserved for this exclusive use or box cars not otherwise employed in the transportation of animals or their fresh products. When movement of the aforesaid ruminants upon or across a public highway is unavoidable, it shall be under such careful supervision and restrictions as the inspector in charge at the port of entry and the local authorities may direct.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 501 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 501

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the increase in 
 unrelated business taxable income by amount of certain fringe benefit 
                               expenses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 14, 2019

   Mr. Brown introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the increase in 
 unrelated business taxable income by amount of certain fringe benefit 
                               expenses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop the Tax Hike on Charities and 
Places of Worship Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF INCREASE OF UNRELATED BUSINESS TAXABLE INCOME BY 
              AMOUNT OF CERTAIN FRINGE BENEFITS.

    (a) In General.--Section 512(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by striking paragraph (7).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall take 
effect as if included in section 13703 of Public Law 115-97.

SEC. 3. INCREASE IN TAX IMPOSED ON CORPORATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Section 11(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
is amended by striking ``21 percent'' and inserting ``22 percent''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
with respect to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 354.125 Evisceration.

No viscera or any part thereof shall be removed from any rabbits which are to be processed under inspection in any official plant, except at the time of evisceration and inspection. Each carcass to be eviscerated shall be opened so as to expose the organs and the body cavity for proper examination by the inspector and shall be prepared immediately after inspection as ready-to-cook rabbit.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          50,873
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,775
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,455
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,152
<PP&E>                                           8,926
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,822
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 181,219
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,146
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           138
<OTHER-SE>                                     170,935
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   181,219
<SALES>                                          8,598
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,598
<CGS>                                            4,120
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,370
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,353
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,241)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,241)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,241)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.46)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 21.1

SOLECTRON CORPORATION SUBSIDIARIES

                                          State or Other Jurisdiction of
Subsidiary                                Incorporation or Organization
------------                              ------------------------------

The Americas
------------
Solectron California Corporation          California
Solectron Technology, Inc.                California
Solectron Washington, Inc.                California
Solectron Massachusetts Corporation       California
Solectron Texas, Inc.                     Delaware
Solectron Holdings, Ltd.                  Delaware
Solectron Georgia Corporation             Georgia
Solectron South Carolina Corporation      South Carolina
Fine Pitch Technology, Inc.               California
Force Computers, Inc.                     Delaware
Solectron Funding Corporation             Delaware
Solectron Federal Systems, Inc.           Delaware
Solectron Global Services, Inc.           California
Solectron Canada Corporation              Canada
Solectron de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.         Mexico
Solectron Cayman Ltd.                     Cayman Islands
Solectron Brasil, Ltda.                   Brazil

Europe
------------
Solectron Sweden AB                       Sweden
Solectron Romania Srl                     Romania
Solectron Ireland Holdings, Ltd.          Cayman Islands
Solectron Ireland                         Cayman Islands
Solectron Netherlands Holding B.V.        Netherlands
Solectron GmbH                            Germany
Solectron Grundbesitz GmbH                Germany
Solectron France, S.A.                    France
Solectron Scotland, Limited               Scotland
Solectron Israel Ltd.                     Israel
Force Computers GmbH                      Germany
Force Computers, SARL                     France
Force Computers U.K. Limited              England
Force Computers Sweden AB                 Sweden

Asia
------------
Solectron Technology Japan, Co. Ltd.      Japan
Solectron Cayman (Asia) Ltd.              Cayman Islands
Solectron Technology SDN. BHD.            Malaysia
Solectron Mauritius Ltd.                  Mauritius
Solectron Technology (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.   Suzhou, Peoples Republic
  of China
Solectron Japan, Inc.                     Japan
Force Computers Japan K.K.                Japan
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 45 (Tuesday, March 8, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 12769]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5270]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, March 
10, 2011 at 2 p.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. 
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be 
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the 
scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Walter, as duty officer, voted to consider the items 
listed for the Closed Meeting in a closed session.
    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, 
March 10, 2011 will be:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings; and other 
matters relating to enforcement proceedings.

    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have 
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: March 3, 2011.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-5270 Filed 3-4-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
### SUBCHAPTER III—PROVISION OF DATA CONTINUITY AFTER THE LANDSAT SYSTEM
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1250,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with thequarterly report of Power3 Medical Products, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John P. Burton,Chief  Accounting  Officer of the  Company,  certify, to the  best of my knowledge,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

The Report fully compiles withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| September 9,  2005 | /s/ John P.  Burton                 |   |
|--------------------|-------------------------------------|--------|
|               |  John P. Burton                |
|               |  Chief Accounting Officer      |
|               |  Power3 Medical Products, Inc. |

 

1

----
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 7635** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. DERRICK JOHNSON, a/k/a Big D , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for th e District of South Carolina , at Columbia
. Cameron McGowan Currie , District Judge. ( 3:08

- cr - 00155

- CMC

- 1; 3:11

- cv - 02261

- CMC )

Submitted : February 16, 2012 Decided: February 23, 2012

Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un p ublished per curiam opinion
. Derrick Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Stacey Denise Haynes, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Derrick John son seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2011 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (B) (200 6 ). A ce rtificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies re lief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently re viewed the record and conclude that Johnson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1

Section 1350 Certifications

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Actuate Corporation (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company and
the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge on the date hereof, the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: May 6, 2011



|                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Peter I. Cittadini                                       
|Peter I. Cittadini                                           
|President and Chief Executive Officer                        
|(Principal Executive Officer)                                
|                                                             
|/s/ Daniel A. Gaudreau                                       
|Daniel A. Gaudreau                                           
|Senior Vice President, Operations and Chief Financial Officer
|(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Seeks Applications to Support Regional Economic and Community 

Development Planning to Create Thriving Rural Communities

WASHINGTON, Feb. 13, 2024 – U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Rural Development Acting Under 

Secretary Roger Glendenning today announced that USDA is seeking applications to implement regional 

economic and community development projects to create thriving communities for people in rural America.

The 2018 Farm Bill authorized the Strategic Economic and Community Development (SECD) initiative to 

support projects that will help rural people and economies prepare for the future. It can be used to implement 

projects that are included in multi-jurisdictional and multi-sectoral strategic community investment plans. 

In fiscal year 2024, reserved funding is available under the following USDA Rural Development programs:

• Community Facilities Direct Loan and Grant Program

• Community Facilities Guaranteed Loan Program

• Water and Waste Disposal Direct Loan and Grant Program

• Water and Waste Disposal Loan Guarantees

• Rural Business Development Grants

To be eligible for SECD reserved funding, applicants must meet the requirements and deadlines under the 

covered programs. Applicants must also submit a Form 1980-88, along with the strategic community 

investment plan to be implemented in part or in whole by the proposed project’s completion. See additional 

requirements below.

• Applications for SECD reserved funding through the Water and Waste Disposal Direct Loan and Grant 

Program should be submitted electronically via RD Apply. If submitting an electronic application is not 

possible, applicants may submit paper forms to the USDA Rural Development office where the project 

is located.

• To apply for SECD reserved funding under other covered grant programs or direct loan programs, 

applicants must submit forms to the USDA Rural Development office where the project is located.

• To apply for SECD reserved funding under covered loan guarantee programs, applicants must submit 

their Form 1980-88 concurrent with the Form 5001-1 and any documentation required under the OneRD 

Guarantee Loan Initiative application guidelines. 

For more information on requirements and deadlines under the covered programs, visit www.rd.usda.gov. For 

additional information on SECD reserved funding, see page 10026 of the Feb. 13, 2024, Federal Register. 

USDA is particularly interested in applications that will advance Biden-Harris Administration priorities to: 
• Reduce climate pollution and increase resilience to the impacts of climate change through economic 

support to rural communities. 

• Ensure all rural residents have equitable access to Rural Development (RD) programs and benefits from 

RD-funded projects; and 

• Help rural communities recover economically through more and better market opportunities and through 

improved infrastructure.

To subscribe to USDA Rural Development updates, visit GovDelivery subscriber page. 

###

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
#### Brennan’s Cadillac, Inc. *v.*William T. Hunt et al.

*William T. Hunt,*pro se, in support of the petition.

Submitted April 12

decided April 18, 1974

The petition for certification by the named defendant for appeal from the Appellate Division of the Court of Common Pleas is denied.
### §1665e. Consideration of ability to repay

A card issuer may not open any credit card account for any consumer under an open end consumer credit plan, or increase any credit limit applicable to such account, unless the card issuer considers the ability of the consumer to make the required payments under the terms of such account.

(Pub. L. 90–321, title I, §150, as added Pub. L. 111–24, title I, §109(a), May 22, 2009, 123 Stat. 1743.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 9 months after May 22, 2009, except as otherwise specifically provided, see section 3 of Pub. L. 111–24, set out as an Effective Date of 2009 Amendment note under section 1602 of this title.
### SUBCHAPTER I—EXISTING INITIATIVES
#### § 590.330 When an application for an appeal inspection may be refused.

When it appears to the official with whom an appeal request is filed that the reasons given in the request are frivolous or not substantial, or that the condition of the product has undergone a material change since the original inspection, or that the original lot has changed in some manner, or the Act or the regulations in this part have not been complied with, the applicant's request for the appeal inspection may be refused. In such case, the applicant shall be promptly notified of the reason(s) for such refusal.

[60 FR 49169, Sept. 21, 1995, as amended at 63 FR 69972, Dec. 17, 1998]
2015 CROP YEAR

IRRIGATED BARLEY

YIELD EXCLUSION (YE)

Gulf of Mexico

Atlantic

Ocean

Pacific

Ocean

-130° -120° -110° -100° -90° -80° -70° -60°

45° 40° 35° 30° 25°

Coordinate System: Albers

Central Meridian: 96°0'0"W

1st Std Parallel: 20°0'0"N

2nd Std Parallel: 60°0'0"N

Latitude of Origin: 40°0'0"N

Metadata:

County Files - US Census Tiger

Files 2013

YE Coverage - USDA - RMA

December 2014

0 125 250 500 750 1,000

Miles

STATEMENT

The Maps produced represent

the number of years (since 1995)

eligible for yield exclusion for

the 2015 crop year.

Document Path: K:\APH\Irrigated\Barley\IrrigatedBarley.mxd

TABLE Links directly to the Commodity

table (double click)

Number of Years Eligible for

Yield Exclusion (YE)

0 years

1 year

2 to 4 years

5 to 7 years

8 to 10 years

11 to 15 years

Barley - Depicts only those counties with

a November 30th filing date.

0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000

Miles
§ 50.2 Applicability of this subpart; cooperation with States. ( a ) The provisions of this subpart apply to all payments made by the Department for the destruction of animals because of tuberculosis, except as specifically provided in subpart B of this part.
( b ) The Administrator cooperates with the proper State authorities in the eradication of tuberculosis and pays Federal indemnities for the destruction of cattle, bison, captive cervids, or swine affected with or exposed to tuberculosis.
[67 FR 48751, July 26, 2002]