alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UNITED
      STATES**


**SECURITIES
      AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION**


**Washington,
      D.C. 20549**




FORM
      6-K





**Report
      of Foreign Issuer**




**Pursuant
      to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of** **the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934**







**For
      the month of May, 2007**


**Commission
      File No. 1-9987**













B
      + H  O C E A N C A R R I E R S, L T D.













3rdFloor,
      Par La Ville Place


**14
      Par-La-Ville Road**


**Hamilton
      HM JX Bermuda**


(Address
      of principal executive offices)

















Indicate
      by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under
      cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.





Form
      20-F X   Form
      40-F





Indicate
      by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted
      by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1):




Indicate
      by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted
      by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7):





Indicate
      by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this Form,
      the
      registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant
      to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.





Yes    NoX







INFORMATION
      CONTAINED IN THIS FORM 6-K REPORT







Set
      forth
      herein as Exhibit 99.1 is a Press Release Announcing Revised First Quarter
      Earnings

















**Signatures**








Pursuant
      to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
      has
      duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
      duly authorized.







Date  May
      16, 2007


B+H
      Ocean Carriers, Ltd.


By:  /s/
      Michael S. Hudner


Chief
      Executive Officer
#### § 592.1 Meaning of words.

Under the regulations in this part words in the singular shall be deemed to import the plural and vice versa, as the case may demand.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

190

CA 12-01653

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL J. MIMASSI, 

PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

TOWN OF WHITESTOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, 

RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. 

(APPEAL NO. 2.) 

DOUGLAS H. ZAMELIS, MANLIUS, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT. 

WILLIAM P. SCHMITT, TOWN ATTORNEY, UTICA, FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court,

Oneida County (Norman I. Siegel, A.J.), entered July 19, 2012 in a

proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The judgment dismissed the

petition. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is 

unanimously vacated without costs. 

Same Memorandum as in Matter of Mimassi v Town of Whitestown

Zoning Bd. of Appeals ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Mar. 22, 2013]). 

Entered: March 22, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
§ 82.25 Denial and withdrawal of permits and special permits. ( a ) *Denial.* If the Administrator determines that the applicant for a permit or special permit is not complying with or could not comply with this subpart or any special conditions needed to prevent the spread of chlamydiosis, or, in the case of a special permit, that the special permit is not required under this subpart, the Administrator may deny the request for a permit or special permit. If the request is denied, the Administrator will send the applicant a written notice explaining why the permit or special permit was denied.
( b ) *Withdrawal.* The Administrator may withdraw a permit or special permit, orally or in writing, if he or she determines the person to whom the permit or special permit has been issued is violating either this subpart or some condition specified in the permit or special permit. The Administrator may withdraw the permit or special permit without advance notice if he or she determines that the person to whom the permit or special permit has been issued is violating either this subpart or some condition specified in the permit or special permit in a way that threatens the public health, interest, or safety. The Administrator will send the person to whom the permit or special permit has been issued a written explanation of why the permit or special permit is to be or was withdrawn.
( c ) *Appeals.* Denial or withdrawal of a permit or special permit may be appealed to the Administrator within 10 days after receipt of the written notice of denial or withdrawal. The appeal must be in writing[3] and must state all of the facts and reasons upon which the person relies to show that the permit or special permit was wrongfully denied or withdrawn. The Administrator will grant or deny the appeal, in writing, explaining all of the reasons for the decision, as promptly as circumstances allow. In cases where there is a conflict as to any material fact, the person denied a permit or special permit, or from whom a permit or special permit is withdrawn, shall be given an opportunity for a hearing with respect to the merits or validity of the denial or withdrawal in accordance with rules of practice adopted for the proceeding.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0116) Footnotes -
82.25
[3] See footnote 10 to § 82.13.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6883

WILLIAM RICHARD MARVIN, III, Petitioner - Appellant, versusRONALD J. ANGELONE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CA-00-742-2) Submitted: October 4, 2001 Decided: October 11, 2001 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Richard Marvin, III, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Bain Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: William Richard Marvin, III, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed therecord and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.Accordingly, we deny Marvin’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Marvin v. Angelone , No. CA-00-742-2 (E.D. Va. filed May 1, 2001; entered May 2, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### **CHAPTER 65—LIABILITY RISK RETENTION**

Sec.
3901.
Definitions.
3902.
Risk retention groups.
3903.
Purchasing groups.
3904.
Securities laws.
3905.
Clarification concerning permissible State authority.
3906.
Injunctive orders issued by United States district courts.
#### § 71.15 Movement from quarantined to free area and shipment therefrom; conditions under which permitted.

No livestock or poultry shall be shipped, trailed, driven, or hauled in private conveyance from the quarantined area in any State, Territory, or the District of Columbia to the free area in the same State, Territory, or the District of Columbia and subsequently delivered to a transportation company for shipment or moved to any other State, Territory, or the District of Columbia without complying with all Federal and State regulations pertaining to such movements.

[28 FR 5937, June 13, 1963, as amended at 34 FR 15642, Oct. 9, 1969]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of FairPoint Communications, Inc. (the "Company") for
the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David L. Hauser, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



/s/ DAVID L. HAUSER David L. Hauser Chief Executive Officer


November 20,
2009

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
§ 381.22 Conditions for receiving inspection. ( a ) Before being granted Federal inspection, an official establishment or an official import inspection establishment, must have developed written Sanitation Standard Operating Procedures, as required by part 416 of this chapter, and written recall procedures as required by part 418 of this chapter.
( b ) Before being granted Federal inspection, an establishment shall have conducted a hazard analysis and developed and validated a HACCP plan, in accordance with §§ 417.2 and 417.4 of this chapter. A conditional grant of inspection shall be issued for a period not to exceed 90 days, during which period the establishment must validate its HACCP plan.
( c ) Before producing new product for distribution in commerce, an establishment shall have conducted a hazard analysis and developed a HACCP plan applicable to that product in accordance with § 417.2 of this chapter. During a period not to exceed 90 days after the date the new product is produced for distribution in commerce, the establishment shall validate its HACCP plan, in accordance with § 417.4 of this chapter.
[61 FR 38866, July 25, 1996, as amended at 77 FR 26936, May 8, 2012; 79 FR 56233, Sept. 19, 2014]
#### § 325.14 Certificates, retention by carrier.

All original certificates delivered to a carrier in accordance with this part shall be filed separate and apart from all its other papers and records or identified in such a manner as to be readily checked by Department employees. Every certificate required to be maintained under this part shall be retained for a period of 2 years after December 31 of the year in which the transaction has occurred.
### §2205. Public education

The Administrator is authorized to take such steps as the Administrator considers appropriate to educate the public and overcome public indifference as to fire, fire prevention, and individual preparedness. Such steps may include, but are not limited to, publications, audiovisual presentations, and demonstrations. Such public education efforts shall include programs to provide specialized information for those groups of individuals who are particularly vulnerable to fire hazards, such as the young and the elderly. The Administrator shall sponsor and encourage research, testing, and experimentation to determine the most effective means of such public education.

(Pub. L. 93–498, §6, Oct. 29, 1974, 88 Stat. 1537; Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title XVIII, §1813, Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 2117.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2013—Pub. L. 112–239 substituted "to take such steps as the Administrator considers appropriate to educate the public and overcome public indifference as to fire, fire prevention, and individual preparedness." for "to take all steps necessary to educate the public and to overcome public indifference as to fire and fire prevention."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of all functions, personnel, assets, components, authorities, grant programs, and liabilities of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, including the functions of the Under Secretary for Federal Emergency Management relating thereto, to the Federal Emergency Management Agency, see section 315(a)(1) of Title 6, Domestic Security.

For transfer of functions, personnel, assets, and liabilities of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, including the functions of the Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency relating thereto, to the Secretary of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see former section 313(1) and sections 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions of National Fire Prevention and Control Administration [now United States Fire Administration] and National Academy for Fire Prevention and Control generally transferred to Federal Emergency Management Agency. For further details see Transfer of Functions note set out under section 2202 of this title.
#### § 72.16 Designated dipping stations to be approved by the Administrator, APHIS on recommendations of State authorities; facilities.

When deemed advisable and upon recommendation by the proper livestock sanitary authorities, designated dipping stations may be approved by the Administrator, APHIS as points at which cattle of the quarantined area of the State in which said station is located may be inspected, dipped, and certified for interstate movement. The facilities furnished shall include proper dipping equipment, noninfectious pens constructed in accordance with § 72.17 and a roofed or covered section of pens of sufficient size to protect all dipped animals from exposure to rain or hot sun. All alleys, chutes, and pens shall be paved or properly floored.

[28 FR 5940, June 13, 1963, as amended at 50 FR 430, Jan. 4, 1985; 56 FR 51974, Oct. 17, 1991]
Meeting Record | The White House

http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/2060_meeting_08222013[9/13/2013 12:37:43 PM]

Get Email Updates Contact Us

Home • The Administration • Office of Management and Budget

REGULATION &

INFORMATION POLICY

About OIRA

Information Policy

Federal Collection of

Information

Regulatory Matters

Meetings and Outside

Communication

Reports to Congress

For Agencies

Statistical Programs &

Standards

Meeting Record

Meeting Record Regarding: Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from New Stationary

Sources: Electric Utility Generation Units

Date: 8 / 22 / 2013

Name Affiliation Client (if applicable)

Bob Wayland EPA

Nick Hudson EPA

Barry Ellman EPA

Nathan Frey OMB/OIRA

Jim Laity OMB/OIRA

Bruce Hill CATF

John Thompson CATF

Ann Weeks CATF

Drew McConville CEQ

Anne Finken CEQ

Meeting material provided to OMB ( pages, kb)

Document 1 (22 pages, 953 kb)

About OMBlog The Budget Management Regulation & Information Policy Legislative Information Join OMB Contact OMB

Home

The White House Blog

Photos & Videos

Photo Galleries

Video

Performances

Live Streams

Podcasts

Briefing Room

Your Weekly Address

Speeches & Remarks

Press Briefings

Statements & Releases

White House Schedule

Presidential Actions

Legislation

Nominations &

Appointments

Issues

Civil Rights

Defense

Disabilities

Economy

Education

Energy & Environment

Ethics

Equal Pay

Foreign Policy

The Administration

President Barack Obama

Vice President Joe Biden

First Lady Michelle Obama

Dr. Jill Biden

The Cabinet

White House Staff

Executive Office of the

President

Other Advisory Boards

About the White House

Inside the White House

Presidents

First Ladies

The Oval Office

The Vice President's

Residence & Office

Eisenhower Executive

Office Building

Camp David

Our Government

The Executive Branch

The Legislative Branch

The Judicial Branch

The Constitution

Federal Agencies &

Commissions

Elections & Voting

State & Local Government

Resources

Federal Register | Join OMB | FOIA | No FEAR Act | OMB Locator | USA.Gov | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Site Search
Meeting Record | The White House

http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/2060_meeting_08222013[9/13/2013 12:37:43 PM]

Disclosures Health Care

Homeland Security

Immigration

Refinancing

Rural

Service

Seniors & Social Security

Snapshots

Taxes

Technology

Urban and Economic

Mobility

Veterans

Violence Prevention

Women

Air Force One

White House Fellows

White House Internships

Tours & Events

Mobile Apps

En español Accessibility Copyright Information Privacy Policy Contact

USA.gov Developers Apply for a Job
#### § 311.21 Mange or scab.

Carcasses of livestock affected with mange or scab in advanced stages, showing cachexia or extensive inflammation of the flesh, shall be condemned. When the disease is slight, the carcass may be passed after removal of the affected portion.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 521 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 521

 To amend title II of the Social Security Act to repeal the Government 
          pension offset and windfall elimination provisions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 14, 2019

 Mr. Brown (for himself, Ms. Collins, Ms. Baldwin, and Ms. Murkowski) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title II of the Social Security Act to repeal the Government 
          pension offset and windfall elimination provisions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Social Security Fairness Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF GOVERNMENT PENSION OFFSET PROVISION.

    (a) In General.--Section 202(k) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 402(k)) is amended by striking paragraph (5).
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Section 202(b)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
        402(b)(2)) is amended by striking ``subsections (k)(5) and 
        (q)'' and inserting ``subsection (q)''.
            (2) Section 202(c)(2) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 402(c)(2)) is 
        amended by striking ``subsections (k)(5) and (q)'' and 
        inserting ``subsection (q)''.
            (3) Section 202(e)(2)(A) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 
        402(e)(2)(A)) is amended by striking ``subsection (k)(5), 
        subsection (q),'' and inserting ``subsection (q)''.
            (4) Section 202(f)(2)(A) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 
        402(f)(2)(A)) is amended by striking ``subsection (k)(5), 
        subsection (q)'' and inserting ``subsection (q)''.

SEC. 3. REPEAL OF WINDFALL ELIMINATION PROVISIONS.

    (a) In General.--Section 215 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
415) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking paragraph (7);
            (2) in subsection (d), by striking paragraph (3); and
            (3) in subsection (f), by striking paragraph (9).
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Subsections (e)(2) and (f)(2) of 
section 202 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 402) are each amended by striking 
``section 215(f)(5), 215(f)(6), or 215(f)(9)(B)'' in subparagraphs (C) 
and (D)(i) and inserting ``paragraph (5) or (6) of section 215(f)''.

SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by this Act shall apply with respect to monthly 
insurance benefits payable under title II of the Social Security Act 
for months after December 2019. Notwithstanding section 215(f) of the 
Social Security Act, the Commissioner of Social Security shall adjust 
primary insurance amounts to the extent necessary to take into account 
the amendments made by section 3.
                                 <all>
```
§ 77.13 Accreditation preparatory States or zones. ( a ) The following are accreditation preparatory States: None.
( b ) The following are accreditation preparatory zones: None.
( c ) If any livestock other than cattle or bison are included in a newly assembled herd on a premises where a tuberculous herd has been depopulated, the State or zone must apply the herd test requirements contained in the “Uniform Methods and Rules—Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication” (January 22, 1999 edition), which is incorporated by reference at § 77.1, for such newly assembled herds to those other livestock in the same manner as to cattle and bison. Failure to do so will result in the removal of the State or zone from the list of accreditation preparatory States or zones and its being reclassified as nonaccredited.
( d ) If tuberculosis is diagnosed within an accreditation preparatory State or zone in an animal not specifically regulated by this part and a risk assessment conducted by APHIS determines that the outbreak poses a tuberculosis risk to livestock within the State or zone, the State or zone must implement a tuberculosis management plan, approved jointly by the State animal health official and the Administrator, within 6 months of the diagnosis. The management plan must include provisions for immediate investigation of tuberculosis in animals held for exhibition and in livestock and wildlife; the prevention of the spread of the disease to other animals held for exhibition and to livestock and wildlife; increased surveillance for tuberculosis in animals held for exhibition and wildlife; eradication of tuberculosis from individual herds; a timeline for tuberculosis eradication; and performance standards by which to measure yearly progress toward eradication. If a State or zone does not implement such a plan within the required 6 months, the State or zone will be reclassified as nonaccredited.
( e ) Accreditation preparatory State or zone status must be renewed annually. To qualify for renewal of accreditation preparatory State or zone status, a State must submit an annual report to APHIS certifying that the State or zone complies with the provisions of the “Uniform Methods and Rules—Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication.” The report must be submitted to APHIS each year between October 1 and November 30.
( f ) To qualify for modified accredited status, an accreditation preparatory State or zone must demonstrate to the Administrator that it complies with the provisions of the “Uniform Methods and Rules—Bovine Tuberculosis Eradication” and that tuberculosis has been prevalent in less than 0.1 percent of the total number of herds of cattle and bison in the State or zone for the most recent year. *Except that:* The Administrator, upon his or her review, may allow a State or zone with fewer than 10,000 herds to have up to 10 affected herds for the most recent year, depending on the veterinary infrastructure, livestock demographics, and tuberculosis control and eradication measures in the State or zone.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0146)
#### § 93.414 Milk from quarantined ruminants.

Milk or cream from ruminants quarantined under the provisions of this part shall not be used by any person other than those in charge of such ruminants, nor be fed to any animals other than those within the same enclosure, without permission of the APHIS representative or inspector in charge of the quarantine station and subject to such restrictions as he or she may consider necessary to each instance. No milk or cream shall be removed from the quarantine premises except in compliance with all State and local regulations.

[55 FR 31495, Aug. 2, 1990. Redesignated at 62 FR 56012, Oct. 28, 1997, as amended at 71 FR 29779, May 24, 2006]