Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration
 In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor herein presents summaries of determinations regarding eligibility to apply for trade adjustment assistance for workers by (TA-W) number issued during the period of 
                    *February 14, 2011 through February 18, 2011.* In order for an affirmative determination to be made for workers of a primary firm and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(a) of the Act must be met. I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the following must be satisfied: (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The sales or production, or both, of such firm have decreased absolutely; and (3) One of the following must be satisfied: (A) Imports of articles or services like or directly competitive with articles produced or services supplied by such firm have increased; (B) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles into which one or more component parts produced by such firm are directly incorporated, have increased; (C) Imports of articles directly incorporating one or more component parts produced outside the United States that are like or directly competitive with imports of articles incorporating one or more component parts produced by such firm have increased; (D) Imports of articles like or directly competitive with articles which are produced directly using services supplied by such firm, have increased; and (4) The increase in imports contributed importantly to such workers' separation or threat of separation and to the decline in the sales or production of such firm; or II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the following must be satisfied: (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in such workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) One of the following must be satisfied: (A) There has been a shift by the workers' firm to a foreign country in the production of articles or supply of services like or directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm; (B) There has been an acquisition from a foreign country by the workers' firm of articles/services that are like or directly competitive with those produced/supplied by the workers' firm; and (3) The shift/acquisition contributed importantly to the workers' separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected workers in public agencies and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(b) of the Act must be met. (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the public agency have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The public agency has acquired from a foreign country services like or directly competitive with services which are supplied by such agency; and (3) The acquisition of services contributed importantly to such workers' separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected secondary workers of a firm and 
                    ( print page 13229)
                    a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(c) of the Act must be met. (1) A significant number or proportion of the workers in the workers' firm have become totally or partially separated, or are threatened to become totally or partially separated; (2) The workers' firm is a Supplier or Downstream Producer to a firm that employed a group of workers who received a certification of eligibility under Section 222(a) of the Act, and such supply or production is related to the article or service that was the basis for such certification; and (3) Either— (A) The workers' firm is a supplier and the component parts it supplied to the firm described in paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20 percent of the production or sales of the workers' firm; or (B) A loss of business by the workers' firm with the firm described in paragraph (2) contributed importantly to the workers' separation or threat of separation. In order for an affirmative determination to be made for adversely affected workers in firms identified by the International Trade Commission and a certification issued regarding eligibility to apply for worker adjustment assistance, each of the group eligibility requirements of Section 222(f) of the Act must be met. (1) The workers' firm is publicly identified by name by the International Trade Commission as a member of a domestic industry in an investigation resulting in— (A) An affirmative determination of serious injury or threat thereof under section 202(b)(1); (B) An affirmative determination of market disruption or threat thereof under section 421(b)(1); or (C) An affirmative final determination of material injury or threat thereof under section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A)); (2) The petition is filed during the 1-year period beginning on the date on which— (A) A summary of the report submitted to the President by the International Trade Commission under section 202(f)(1) with respect to the affirmative determination described in paragraph (1)(A) is published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     under section 202(f)(3); or (B) Notice of an affirmative determination described in subparagraph (1) is published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                    ; and (3) The workers have become totally or partially separated from the workers' firm within— (A) The 1-year period described in paragraph (2); or (B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), the 1-year period preceding the 1-year period described in paragraph (2). Affirmative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance The following certifications have been issued. The date following the company name and location of each determination references the impact date for all workers of such determination. The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the Trade Act have been met. TA-W No.
Subject firm
Location
Impact date74,339
Sitel Operating Corporation, Sitel Worldwide Corporation
Memphis, TN
July 1, 2009.74,713
Chii, DBA Lifetime Coatings, Manpower
Quincy, IL
September 20, 2009.74,974
TI Automotive, Leased Workers from Manpower, Aerotek, and Spherion
Chesterfield, MI
December 5, 2009.75,048
Premier Technical Plastics, Leased Workers from Manpower
Minden, LA
December 23, 2009.75,168
Hearth and Home Technologies, Inc
Colville, WA
January 28, 2010.
 The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services) of the Trade Act have been met. TA-W No.
Subject firm
Location
Impact date74,745
Continental Graphics Corporation, CDG Datagraphics; The Boeing Company; Leased Workers Excell and Harvey Nash
Bellevue, WA
October 15, 2009.74,751
Eaton Corporation, Clutch Division
Auburn, IN
October 6, 2009.74,812
Heraeus Noblelight de Puerto Rico, Inc
Cayey, PR
October 28, 2009.74,813
Eastman Kodak Company (GCG), Electrographic Print Solutions; Leased Workers from Adecco and Datrose
Spencerport, NY
October 29, 2009.74,901
Hawker Beechcraft Corporation, Hawker Beachcraft International SVC, Rapid Surplus Parts, etc
Wichita, KS
November 11, 2009.75,006
EMD Serono Biotech Center, Inc., EMD Serono Research Institute, On Assignment Lab Support & Randstad
Billerica, MA
December 15, 2009.75,017
Nokia, Inc., Nokia Group, ATC Logistics and Electronics
Fort Worth, TX
December 17, 2010.75,039
Auto-trol Technology Corporation, Coretechs
Westminster, CO
December 21, 2009.75,058
Electrolux Home Care Products, Inc., Electrolux Central Vacuum Systems; AB Electrolux
Webster City, IA
February 24, 2011.75,058A
Manpower, Electrolux Home Care Products, Inc
Webster City, IA
December 24, 2009.75,086
Callaway Golf Company, Operations Division, Volt Services Group
Carlsbad, CA
January 10, 2010.75,094
Alstyle Apparel, Ennis, Inc
Anaheim, CA
January 12, 2010.75,103
Sun Mountain Sports, Inc., Plastic Injection Molding Division; Leased Workers from Labor Ready
Missoula, MT
January 11, 2010.( print page 13230)75,110
Propex Operating Company, LLC, Leased Workers from The Pollard Agency and PFMI
Hazlehurst, GA
January 18, 2010.75,111
Affiliated Computer Services, Inc., Human Capital Management Colustions Unit, Xerox Corp
Schaumburg, IL
January 18, 2010.75,126
Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Carolina, Commercial and Government Operations Division; Leased Workers Manpower, etc
Durham, NC
December 20, 2009.75,137
John Crane, Inc
Cranston, RI
January 24, 2010.75,147
Elkay Manufacturing
Broadview, IL
January 28, 2010.75,171
Dex One, West Division, Advantage XPO
Tucson, AZ
February 2, 2010.75,171A
Dex One, West Division, Advantage XPO
Colorado Springs, Englewood, CO
February 2, 2010.75,171B
Dex One, West Division, Advantage XPO
West Des Moines, IA
February 2, 2010.75,171C
Dex One, West Division, Advantage XPO
Maple Grove, MN
February 2, 2010.75,171D
Dex One, West Division, Advantage XPO
Albuquerque, NM
February 2, 2010.75,171E
Dex One, West Division, Advantage XPO
Spokane, Tacoma and Vancouver, WA
February 2, 2010.75,172
Dex One, East Division, Advantage XPO
Fort Myers, Maitland and Ocala, FL
February 2, 2010.75,172A
Dex One, East Division, Advantage XPO
Arlington Heights, Chicago, Lombard, etc., IL
February 2, 2010.75,172B
Dex One, East Division, Advantage XPO
Fayetteville and Morrisville, NC
February 2, 2010.75,172C
Dex One, East Division, Advantage XPO
Las Vegas, NV
February 2, 2010.75,172D
Dex One, East Division, Advantage XPO
Carlisle and Dunmore, PA
February 2, 2010.75,172E
Dex One, East Division, Advantage XPO
Bristol, TN
February 2, 2010.75,176
Lynx Medical Systems, Coding Services Div., Ingenix, Wages Previously Under FEIN 91-1263758
Bellevue, WA
February 3, 2010.75,178
Simpson Door Company, Simpson Investment Company
McCleary, WA
December 20, 2010.75,180
Contract Pharmaceuticals Limited Niagra (CPL Niagra), SPS Temporaries and Imagine Staffing
Buffalo, NY
February 4, 2010.75,192
Core Industries, Inc., d/b/a Star Trac, Aerotek, Helpmates, Mattson & Empire Staffing
Irvine, CA
February 8, 2010.75,244
Carrier Air Conditioning, United Technologies Corporation, Commercial Divisions
Tyler, TX
January 27, 2011.
 The following certifications have been issued. The requirements of Section 222(c) (supplier to a firm whose workers are certified eligible to apply for TAA) of the Trade Act have been met. TA-W No.
Subject firm
Location
Impact date74,865
Johnson Controls, Inc., Working On-Site at Hewlett Packard Company
Corvallis, OR
November 9, 2009.75,033
Indianapolis Metal Center, General Motors, Wages Previously Under Fein 38-0572515, Aerotek etc
Indianapolis, IN
December 20, 2009.75,227
Dana Structural Manufacturing LLC, Structures Division; Leased Workers from Manpower
Longview, TX
February 10, 2010.
 Negative Determinations for Worker Adjustment Assistance In the following cases, the investigation revealed that the eligibility criteria for worker adjustment assistance have not been met for the reasons specified. The investigation revealed that the criterion under paragraph (a)(1), or (b)(1), or (c)(1) (employment decline or threat of separation) of section 222 has not been met. TA-W No.
Subject firm
Location
Impact date75,053
C. Fassinger & Sons Mfg. Co., LLC
New Castle, PA.75,107
Hewlett Packard Company, Global Business Intelligence Unit
Fort Collins, CO.
 The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift in production or services to a foreign country) of section 222 have not been met. TA-W No.
Subject firm
Location
Impact date73,718
Medica
Minnetonka, MN.74,254
National Carton & Coating Company, Leased Workers from CBS/Staffmark
Xenia, OH.( print page 13231)74,634
A. H. Schreiber Company, Inc.
Bristol, TN.74,706
Busch Agricultural Resources, LLC, Anheuser-Busch, Inc.
Manitowoc, WI.74,756
Fort McDowell Yavapai Materials, Plants 1, 3 and 20
Fort McDowell, AZ
September 27, 2009.74,756A
Fort McDowell Yavapai Materials, Plants 4 and 70
Buckeye, AZ
September 27, 2009.74,756B
Fort McDowell Yavapai Materials, Plant 40
Scottsdale, AZ
September 27, 2009.74,756C
Fort McDowell Yavapai Materials, Plant 50
Glendale, AZ
September 27, 2009.74,756D
Fort McDowell Yavapai Materials, Plant 60
Queen Creek, AZ
September 27, 2009.74,772
HEITEC, Inc., Including Workers Wages that are Reported Under Hacker Engineering, Inc
Palm Desert, CA.75,027
K.W.S., Inc.
Cheboygan, MI.
 The investigation revealed that the criteria under paragraphs (b)(2) and (b)(3) (public agency acquisition of services from a foreign country) of section 222 have not been met. TA-W No.
Subject firm
Location
Impact date74,979
City of Walla Walla, Development Services Department
Walla Walla, WA.
 Determinations Terminating Investigations of Petitions for Worker Adjustment Assistance After notice of the petitions was published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     and on the Department's Web site, as required by Section 221 of the Act (19 U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated investigations of these petitions. The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. TA-W No.
Subject firm
Location
Impact date74,853
Kurz-Kasch
South Boston, VA
 The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the petitioning groups of workers are covered by active certifications. Consequently, further investigation in these cases would serve no purpose since the petitioning group of workers cannot be covered by more than one certification at a time. TA-W No.
Subject firm
Location
Impact date74,438
Bruss North America, Inc.
Orion, MI.74,978
Western Union, LLC, Operations Division
St. Charles, MO.
 The following determinations terminating investigations were issued because the petitions are the subject of ongoing investigations under petitions filed earlier covering the same petitioners. TA-W No.
Subject firm
Location
Impact date75,187
Dex One
Morrisville, NC.
 I hereby certify that the aforementioned determinations were issued during the period of 
                    *February 14, 2011 through February 18, 2011.*
                     Copies of these determinations may be requested under the Freedom of Information Act. Requests may be submitted by fax, courier services, or mail to FOIA Disclosure Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance (ETA), U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 or to 
                    *foiarequest@dol.gov.*
                     These determinations also are available on the Department's Web site at 
                    *http://www.doleta.gov/​tradeact*
                     under the searchable listing of determinations. Dated: March 2, 2011. Michael W. Jaffe, Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.


[FR Doc. 2011-5475 Filed 3-9-11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P