alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1.8 Agency review of request for correction or amendment of record. ( a ) The Commission shall, not later than ten (10) days (excluding Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays) after the receipt of the request for a correction or amendment of a record under § 1.7, acknowledge receipt of the request and inform the individual whether information is required before the correction or amendment can be considered.
( b ) If no additional information is required, within ten (10) days from receipt of the request, the Commission shall either make the requested correction or amendment or notify the individual of its refusal to do so, including in the notification the reasons for the refusal, and the appeal procedures provided in § 1.9.
( c ) The Commission shall make each requested correction or amendment to a record if that correction or amendment will tend to negate inaccurate, irrelevant, untimely, or incomplete matter in the record.
( d ) The Commission shall inform prior recipients of any amendment or correction or notation of dispute of such individual's record if an accounting of the disclosure was made. The individual may request a list of prior recipients if an accounting of the disclosure was made.
# C_2010209EN.01005303.xml

| 31.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/53

---

Action brought on 19 May 2010 — Lebedef v Commission

(Case F-33/10)

()

2010/C 209/83

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Giorgio Lebedef (Senningerberg, Luxembourg) (represented by: F. Frabetti, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Application to annul the applicant’s career development report in respect of the period from 1.1.2005 to 31.12.2005, as it was drawn up following its annulment by the Civil Service Tribunal in Case F-36/07

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | annul the applicant’s career development report (CDR) in respect of the period from 1.1.2005 to 31.12.2005, as it was drawn up following its annulment by the Civil Service Tribunal by the judgment of 7 May 2008 in Case F-36/07 Lebedef v Commission; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the applicant’s career development report (CDR) in respect of the period from 1.1.2005 to 31.12.2005, as it was drawn up following its annulment by the Civil Service Tribunal by the judgment of 7 May 2008 in Case F-36/07 Lebedef v Commission;

Lebedef

Commission

| — | order the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Commission to pay the costs.

---
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with theAnnual Report on Form 10-K of Vital Images, Inc. (the “Company”)for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on March 16, 2005 (the “Periodic Report”), I, MichaelH. Carrel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               The Annual Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

2.               The informationcontained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: | March 16, 2005 |   | /s/ Michael H. Carrel   |
|--------|---------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |                |   | Michael H. Carrel       |
|   |                |   | Chief Financial Officer |
|   |                |   | Vital Images, Inc. |

 

71

----
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 46 (Wednesday, March 9, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12973-12974]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5285]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2011-N-0002]


Neurological Devices Panel of the Medical Devices Advisory 
Committee; Amendment of Notice

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing an amendment 
to the notice of meeting of the Neurological Devices Panel of the 
Medical Devices Advisory Committee. This meeting was announced in the 
Federal Register of February 7, 2011 (76 FR 6625). The amendment is 
being

[[Page 12974]]

made to reflect a change in the Agenda portion of the document. There 
are no other changes.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Olga I. Claudio, Center for Devices 
and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New 
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 66, rm. 1611, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-
796-7608, or FDA Advisory Committee Information Line, 1-800-741-8138 
(301-443-0572 in the Washington, DC area). Please call the Information 
Line for up-to-date information on this meeting.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of February 7, 2011, 
FDA announced that a meeting of the Neurological Devices Panel of the 
Medical Devices Advisory Committee would be held on March 17 and 18, 
2011. On page 6625, in the second column, in the last paragraph, in the 
first and second sentences, the ``for the NovoTTF-100A Treatment Kit, 
sponsored by Hogan Lovells US LLP for NovoCure, Ltd. The NovoTTF-100A 
Treatment Kit'' portion of the document is changed to read as follows: 
``for the NovoTTF-100A System, sponsored by NovoCure, Ltd. The NovoTTF-
100A System''.
    This notice is issued under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 
U.S.C. app. 2) and 21 CFR part 14, relating to the advisory committees.

    Dated: March 3, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-5285 Filed 3-8-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.1

                    CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                          AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

         This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal
Procedures) of the United States Code and shall not be relied on by any person
for any other purpose.

         The undersigned, who are the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, respectively, of S1 Corporation (the "Company"), hereby each
certify as follows:

         To the knowledge of the undersigned, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
of the Company (the "Report"), which accompanies this Certificate, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and all information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

         Dated this 14th day of May 2003.



                                     /s/ JAIME W. ELLERTSON
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Jaime W. Ellertson, Chief Executive Officer




                                     /s/ MATTHEW HALE
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Matthew Hale, Chief Financial Officer
§ 391.4 Laboratory services rate. ( a ) For each calendar year, FSIS will calculate the laboratory services rate, per hour per program employee, provided pursuant to §§ 350.7, 351.9, 352.5, 354.101, 355.12, and 362.5 of this chapter, using the following formula: The quotient of dividing the Office of Public Health Science (OPHS) previous fiscal year's regular direct pay by OPHS previous fiscal year's regular hours, plus the quotient multiplied by the calendar year's percentage cost of living increase, plus the benefits rate, plus the travel and operating rate, plus the overhead rate, plus the allowance for bad debt rate.
( b ) FSIS will calculate the benefits rate, the travel and operating rate, the overhead rate, and the allowance for bad debt rate using the formulas set forth in § 391.2(b), and the cost of living increases and percentage of inflation factors set forth in § 391.2(c).
[76 FR 20228, Apr. 12, 2011]
### SUBCHAPTER IV—RENTAL CAR AGENCY INSURANCE ACTIVITIES
### §1692. Congressional findings and declaration of purpose

#### (a) Abusive practices

There is abundant evidence of the use of abusive, deceptive, and unfair debt collection practices by many debt collectors. Abusive debt collection practices contribute to the number of personal bankruptcies, to marital instability, to the loss of jobs, and to invasions of individual privacy.

#### (b) Inadequacy of laws

Existing laws and procedures for redressing these injuries are inadequate to protect consumers.

#### (c) Available non-abusive collection methods

Means other than misrepresentation or other abusive debt collection practices are available for the effective collection of debts.

#### (d) Interstate commerce

Abusive debt collection practices are carried on to a substantial extent in interstate commerce and through means and instrumentalities of such commerce. Even where abusive debt collection practices are purely intrastate in character, they nevertheless directly affect interstate commerce.

#### (e) Purposes

It is the purpose of this subchapter to eliminate abusive debt collection practices by debt collectors, to insure that those debt collectors who refrain from using abusive debt collection practices are not competitively disadvantaged, and to promote consistent State action to protect consumers against debt collection abuses.

(Pub. L. 90–321, title VIII, §802, as added Pub. L. 95–109, Sept. 20, 1977, 91 Stat. 874.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 90–321, title VIII, §819, formerly §818, as added by Pub. L. 95–109, Sept. 20, 1977, 91 Stat. 883, §818; renumbered §819, Pub. L. 109–351, title VIII, §801(a)(1), Oct. 13, 2006, 120 Stat. 2004, provided that: "This title [enacting this subchapter] takes effect upon the expiration of six months after the date of its enactment [Sept. 20, 1977], but section 809 [section 1692g of this title] shall apply only with respect to debts for which the initial attempt to collect occurs after such effective date."

#### Short Title

This subchapter known as the "Fair Debt Collection Practices Act", see Short Title note set out under section 1601 of this title.
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Patrick Fane, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 73-310;

Second District (2nd Division)

January 21, 1975.

*995Ralph Ruebner, of State Appellate Defender’s Office, of Elgin, for appellant.

Patrick E. Ward, State’s Attorney, of Dixon (James W. Jerz and Martin P. Moltz, both of Illinois State’s Attorneys Association, of Elgin, of counsel), for the People.

Opinion by

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE RECHENMACHER.
CERTIFICATION
OF
 CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  In
connection with this Quarterly Report of Mega
Media Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period
ending July 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gennady
Pomeranets, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
  1. Such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2008, fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2. The
information contained in such Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the
period ending July 31, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Mega Media Group,
Inc.
  By:
                /s/Gennady
      PomeranetsGENNADY
      POMERANETSChief Financial
      Officer,Date:
                September
      19, 2008
Exhibit
31.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 
 I,
Christopher J. Canfield, certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Rapid Link,
Incorporated;
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:
 
 a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 
 a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which could adversely affect the
registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 
 b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.
 
 
 Date:
      January 27, 2009
                /s/
      Christopher J. CanfieldChristopher
      J. Canfield
                  Chief
      Executive Officer, President, Treasurer and
  Director
S. 1258

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

An Act

To authorize funds for the payment of salaries and expenses of the Patent and

Trademark Office, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Patent Fee Integrity and Innovation Protection Act of 1999’’.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

There are authorized to be made available for the payment

of salaries and necessary expenses of the Patent and Trademark

Office in fiscal year 2000, $116,000,000 from fees collected in fiscal

year 1999 and such fees as are collected in fiscal year 2000 pursuant

to title 35, United States Code, and the Trademark Act of 1946

(15 U.S.C. 1051 et seq.), except that the Commissioner is not

authorized to charge and collect fees to cover the accrued indirect

personnel costs associated with post-retirement health and life

insurance of officers and employees of the Patent and Trademark

Office other than those charged and collected pursuant to title

35, United States Code, and the Trademark Act of 1946.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

This Act shall take effect on October 1, 1999.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
§ 381.522 Transition grants. ( a ) Transition grants are funds that a State participating in a cooperative interstate shipment program under this subpart may apply for to reimburse selected establishments in the State for the cost to train one individual in the seven HACCP principles for meat or poultry processing as required under § 417.7 of this chapter and associated training in the development of sanitation standard operating procedures required under part 416 of this chapter.
( b ) A State participating in a cooperative interstate shipment program that receives a transition grant must use grant funds to reimburse the training costs of one employee per each selected establishment in the State. Any other use of such funds is prohibited.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 17, 2015. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, April 17, 2015 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A15A0965. JEAN PATRICIA HILTON A/K/A JEAN PATRICIA ENSTROM v. THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON f/k/a THE BANK OF NEW YORK.
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
### **CHAPTER 2C—PUBLIC UTILITY HOLDING COMPANIES**
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification of the Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of KBW, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Robert Giambrone, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated:  August 5, 2011

 

 
|   | /s/ ROBERT GIAMBRONE    |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Robert Giambrone        |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----

*                 The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

----
### §4603. Transition

Before the expiration of the period ending 18 months after the appointment of the Director under section 4512 of this title, any rules and regulations promulgated before October 28, 1992, by the Secretary pursuant to the Federal National Mortgage Association Charter Act [12 U.S.C. 1716 et seq.] or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation Act [12 U.S.C. 1451 et seq.] shall remain in effect unless modified, terminated, superseded, or revoked by operation of law or in accordance with law. Such rules and regulations shall terminate, effective upon the expiration of such period.

(Pub. L. 102–550, title XIII, §1356, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 3971.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Federal National Mortgage Association Charter Act, referred to in text, is title III of act June 27, 1934, ch. 847, 48 Stat. 1252, which is classified generally to subchapter III (§1716 et seq.) of chapter 13 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1716 of this title and Tables.

The Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation Act, referred to in text, is title III of Pub. L. 91–351, July 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 451, which is classified generally to chapter 11A (§1451 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title and Statement of Purpose note set out under section 1451 of this title and Tables.
§ 13.10 Default upon failure to answer. ( a ) If the Defendant does not answer within the time prescribed in § 13.9(a), the Reviewing Official may refer the Complaint to an ALJ by filing the Complaint and a Statement that Defendant has failed to answer on time.
( b ) Upon the referral of the Complaint, the ALJ will promptly serve on Defendant in the manner prescribed in § 13.8, a notice that an Initial Decision will be issued under this section.
( c ) In addition, the ALJ will assume the facts alleged in the Complaint to be true, and, if such facts establish liability under § 13.3, the ALJ will issue an Initial Decision imposing the maximum amount of penalties and assessments allowed under the statute.
( d ) Except as otherwise provided in this section, by failing to answer on time, the Defendant waives any right to further review of the penalties and assessments imposed under paragraph (c) of this section, and the Initial Decision will become final and binding upon the parties 30 days after it is issued.
( e ) If, before such an Initial Decision becomes final, the Defendant files a motion seeking to reopen on the grounds that extraordinary circumstances prevented the Defendant from answering, the Initial Decision will be stayed pending the ALJ's decision on the motion.
( f ) If, on such motion, the Defendant can demonstrate extraordinary circumstances excusing the failure to answer on time, the ALJ will withdraw the Initial Decision in paragraph (c) of this section, if such a decision has been issued, and will grant the Defendant an opportunity to answer the Complaint.
( g ) A decision of the ALJ denying a Defendant's motion under paragraph (e) of this section is not subject to reconsideration under § 13.38.
( h ) The Defendant may appeal to the Authority Head the decision denying a motion to reopen by filing a notice of appeal in accordance with § 13.26 within 15 days after the ALJ denies the motion. The timely filing of a notice of appeal will stay the Initial Decision until the Authority Head decides the issue.
( i ) If the Defendant files a timely notice of appeal with the Authority Head, the ALJ will forward the record of the proceeding to the Authority Head.
( j ) The Authority Head will decide expeditiously whether extraordinary circumstances excuse the Defendant's failure to answer on time based solely on the record before the ALJ.
( k ) If the Authority Head decides that extraordinary circumstances excused the Defendant's failure to answer on time, the Authority Head will remand the case to the ALJ with instructions to grant the Defendant an opportunity to answer.
( l ) If the Authority Head decides that the Defendant's failure to answer on time is not excused, the Authority Head will reinstate the Initial Decision of the ALJ, which will become final and binding upon the parties 30 days after the Authority Head issues such decision.
#### § 318.11 [Reserved]