alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Seeks Applications for Grants to Improve the Rural Economy by Strengthening 

Cooperative Development Centers

WASHINGTON, May 30, 2018 – Assistant to the Secretary for Rural Development Anne Hazlett today 

announced that USDA is seeking applications for grants under USDA’s Rural Cooperative Development Grant

program (RCDG).

This program helps improve the economic condition of rural areas by helping individuals and businesses 

start, expand or improve rural cooperatives and other mutually-owned businesses. Nonprofit corporations and 

institutions of higher education are eligible to apply. Public bodies, for-profit business and individuals are not 

eligible. USDA expects to award up to $5.8 million for FY 2018.

The maximum grant award is $200,000. Grants may be used to develop and operate a Rural Cooperative 

Development Center that could provide the following technical assistance and other services to rural businesses:

• Conducting feasibility studies

• Developing business plans

• Providing leadership and operational improvement training

Questions about the application process may be directed to the Rural Development State Office where the 

applicant is located. For a list of offices, visit the state office website. Paper applications are due July 30, 2018. 

Electronic applications are due July 24, 2018. For more information, see page 24726 of the May 30 Federal 

Register.

USDA encourages applications that will support recommendations made in the report to the President from 

the Task Force on Agriculture and Rural Prosperity to help improve life in rural America. Applicants are 

encouraged to consider projects that provide measurable results in helping rural communities build robust and 

sustainable economies through strategic investments in infrastructure, partnerships and innovation. Key 

strategies include:

• Achieving e-Connectivity for Rural America

• Developing the Rural Economy

• Harnessing Technological Innovation

• Supporting a Rural Workforce

• Improving Quality of Life

#
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 33-74720, 33-80852, 333-09095, 333-44667, 333-44669, 333-36639,
33-92900, 333-00500, 333-36645 and 333-84199) pertaining to the 1989 Stock Plan,
1993 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 1993 Employee Stock Bonus Plan, 1994
Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan, 1997 Equity Incentive Plan and 1997
Non-Officer Equity Incentive Plan of Axys Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and to the
Registration Statements (Form S-3 Nos. 333-32100, 333-35826, and 333-35828)
pertaining to the registration of 3,497,778 shares of common stock, $35,000,000
of debt securities and warrants to purchase common stock, and $50,000,000 of its
common stock, of our report dated February 15, 2001 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Discovery Partners International, Inc.
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Axys Pharmaceuticals, Inc. for the
year ended December 31, 2000.

                                         ERNST & YOUNG LLP

San Diego, California
March 27, 2001
§ 53.3 Appraisal of animals, eggs, or materials. ( a ) Animals or eggs affected by or exposed to disease, and materials required to be destroyed because of being contaminated by or exposed to disease shall be appraised by an APHIS employee and a representative of the State jointly, or, if the State authorities approve, by an APHIS employee alone.
( b ) The appraisal of animals shall be based on the fair market value and shall be determined by the meat, egg production, dairy or breeding value of such animals. Animals may be appraised in groups providing they are the same species and type and providing that where appraisal is by the head each animal in the group is the same value per head or where appraisal is by the pound each animal in the group is the same value per pound.
( c ) Appraisals of animals shall be reported on forms furnished by APHIS. Reports of appraisals shall show the number of animals of each species and the value per head or the weight and value by pound.
( d ) Appraisals of materials shall be reported on forms furnished by APHIS. Reports of appraisals of materials shall, when practicable, show the number, size or quantity, unit price, and total value of each kind of material appraised.
( e ) Indemnity for eggs required to be destroyed due to an outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza will be based on the fair market value of the eggs, as determined by an appraisal. Appraisals of eggs shall be reported on forms furnished by APHIS. The amount of indemnity paid, together with the amount for net salvage the owner or contractor received, if any, shall not exceed the appraised fair market value of the eggs.
[28 FR 5935, June 13, 1963, as amended at 35 FR 13981, Sept. 3, 1970; 36 FR 25217, Dec. 30, 1971; 56 FR 51974, Oct. 17, 1991; 68 FR 6343, Feb. 7, 2003; 81 FR 6750, Feb. 9, 2016]
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****Gridpoints :the NAS Systems Division quarterly.**** 
SuDocNumber:NAS1.97:
ItemNumber: n/a
CGPSystem Number:000514670
 
v1n1_gridpoints_winter1999.pdf
v1n2_gridpoints_spring2000.pdf
v1n3_gridpoints_summer2000.pdf
v1n4_gridpoints_fall2000.pdf
v2n1_gridpoints_spring2001.pdf
v2n2_gridpoints_summer2001.pdf
v2n3_gridpoints_Fall2001.pdf
v3n1_gridpoints_spring2002.pdf
v3n2_gridpoints_summer2002.pdf
v3n3_gridpoints_fall2002.pdf
v4n1_gridpoints_winter2003.pdf**
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1078 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1078

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 For the relief of Mrs. Elizabeth Eka Bassey, Emmanuel O. Paul Bassey, 
                    and Mary Idongesit Paul Bassey.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for purposes of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Mrs. Elizabeth 
Eka Bassey, Emmanuel O. Paul Bassey, and Mary Idongesit Paul Bassey 
shall be held and considered to have been lawfully admitted to the 
United States for permanent residence as of the date of the enactment 
of this Act upon payment of the required visa fees.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

    Upon the granting of permanent residence to Mrs. Elizabeth Eka 
Bassey, Emmanuel O. Paul Bassey, and Mary Idongesit Paul Bassey, as 
provided in this Act, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper 
officer to reduce by the appropriate number during the current fiscal 
year the total number of immigrant visas available to natives of the 
country of the aliens' birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration 
and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)).

            Passed the Senate September 28 (legislative day, September 
      22), 2000.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1078

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 For the relief of Mrs. Elizabeth Eka Bassey, Emmanuel O. Paul Bassey, 
                    and Mary Idongesit Paul Bassey.
```
### §614. Organization certificate; acknowledgment; forwarding to, filing, and approval by Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System; permit to do business; body corporate; name; seal; corporate succession; contracts; suits; directors, officers, and employees; bylaws

The persons signing the organization certificate shall duly acknowledge the execution thereof before a judge of some court of record or notary public, who shall certify thereto under the seal of such court or notary, and thereafter the certificate shall be forwarded to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System to be filed and preserved in its office. Upon duly making and filing articles of association and an organization certificate, and after the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System has approved the same and issued a permit to begin business, the association shall become and be a body corporate, and as such and in the name designated therein shall have power to adopt and use a corporate seal, which may be changed at the pleasure of its board of directors; to have succession for a period of twenty years unless sooner dissolved by the act of the shareholders owning two-thirds of the stock or by an act of Congress or unless its franchises become forfeited by some violation of law; to make contracts; to sue and be sued, complain, and defend in any court of law or equity; to elect or appoint directors; and, by its board of directors, to appoint such officers and employees as may be deemed proper, define their authority and duties, require bonds of them, and fix the penalty thereof, dismiss such officers or employees, or any thereof, at pleasure and appoint others to fill their places; to prescribe, by its board of directors, bylaws not inconsistent with law or with the regulations of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System regulating the manner in which its stock shall be transferred, its directors elected or appointed, its officers and employees appointed, its property transferred, and the privileges granted to it by law exercised and enjoyed.

(Dec. 23, 1913, ch. 6, §25A (par.), formerly §25(a), as added Dec. 24, 1919, ch. 18, 41 Stat. 378; amended Aug. 23, 1935, ch. 614, title II, §203(a), 49 Stat. 704; Pub. L. 95–369, §3(c), Sept. 17, 1978, 92 Stat. 609; renumbered §25A, Pub. L. 102–242, title I, §142(e)(2), Dec. 19, 1991, 105 Stat. 2281.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is comprised of par. 5 (undesignated) of section 25A of act Dec. 23, 1913, which comprises this subchapter. For complete classification of section 25A of this Act, see Codification note set out under section 611 of this title.

#### Amendments

1978—Pub. L. 95–369 struck out ", all of whom shall be citizens of the United States" after "to elect or appoint directors".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Section 203(a) of act Aug. 23, 1935, changed name of Federal Reserve Board to Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
# C_2010209EN.01002601.xml

| 31.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/26

---

Action brought on 19 May 2010 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-248/10)

()

2010/C 209/36

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: K. Karanasou-Apostolopoulou and A. Nijenhuis)

Applicant:

Defendant: Hellenic Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The Court is asked to:

| — | declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply fully with Directive 2007/44/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 September 2007 amending Council Directive 92/49/EEC and Directives 2002/83/EC, 2004/39/EC, 2005/68/EC and 2006/48/EC as regards procedural rules and evaluation criteria for the prudential assessment of acquisitions and increase of holdings in the financial sector, or in any event by failing to inform the Commission of those measures, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply fully with Directive 2007/44/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 September 2007 amending Council Directive 92/49/EEC and Directives 2002/83/EC, 2004/39/EC, 2005/68/EC and 2006/48/EC as regards procedural rules and evaluation criteria for the prudential assessment of acquisitions and increase of holdings in the financial sector, or in any event by failing to inform the Commission of those measures, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

1

| — | order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The time-limit for transposing Directive 2007/44/EC into domestic law expired on 21 March 2009.

---

(1)  OJ L 247 of 21.9.2007, p. 1

1

---
#### The People *ex rel.*Lawrence S. Beardsley *v.*M. R. M. Wallace.

1. *Appeal—-from judgment for taxes.*Under the act of March 28,1873, in relation to the assessment and collection of taxes in incorporated cities, towns and villages, an appeal from a judgment of the county court against real estate for taxes, lies only to the Supreme Court. It does not lie to the circuit court.

2. *Statute—whether general or special.*A statute for the assessment and collection of taxes, which applies to all incorporated cities and towns in the State, is a general, and not a special law, within the meaning- of the constitution.

3. *Same—amendments to, need not he read on three several days.*The constitutional provision requiring bills to be read on three several days before their passage, does not apply to amendments to the same.

*681This was an application, in this court, for a *mandamus,*as stated in the opinion.

Mr. Edwabd Roby, for the relator.

Per Cubiam :

This is an application, by relator, for a *mandamus*against the judge of the county court of Cook county, to compel him to allow an appeal to the circuit court of that county, *from*a judgment rendered against relator’s lands for taxes due the city of Chicago. The 10th section of the act of the 28th of March, 1873, in regard to the assessment and collection of taxes in incorporated cities, towns and villages, etc., (Sess. Laws 1873, p. 42,) only gives appeals from the county court to this court. It declares that, in case of judgments for such taxes, “appeals shall also be allowed to the Supreme Court, (and not elsewhere,) as now provided by law, in like cases, to the circuit court, from any judgment or order of sale made by any county court respecting any property returned delinquent, under the provisions of this act.” And the balance of the section refers to this court, and not to the circuit court, in regulating the practice on such appeals. Although the language is somewhat obscure, when the entire section is considered, we have no doubt that it was the design to give an appeal from such judgments alone to this court, and to take it from the circuit court. This being so, there can be no power to compel the county court to grant an appeal to the circuit court, and the writ must be refused.

It is urged that the act referred to is a special law. We are of opinion that the law is general, as it applies to the collection of all municipal taxes of incorporated cities, towns and villages in the State. Hence the objection, that the title of the act does not sufficiently specify the objects of the law, does not apply.

It is also objected, that the 10th section of the act was not constitutionally adopted, because it was engrafted as an amendment whilst the bill was being considered, and was not *682read on three several days in the house adopting it as an amendment. We are clearly of opinion that the requirement does not apply to an amendment, and the objection can not prevail.

The writ of *mandamus*is denied.

*Mandamus denied.*
### §954. Mixed-funded athletic and recreational extracurricular programs

(a) Authority.—In the case of a Coast Guard Academy mixed-funded athletic or recreational extracurricular program, the Commandant may designate funds appropriated to the Coast Guard and available for that program to be treated as nonappropriated funds and expended for that program in accordance with laws applicable to the expenditure of nonappropriated funds. Appropriated funds so designated shall be considered to be nonappropriated funds for all purposes and shall remain available until expended.

(b) Covered Programs.—In this section, the term "Coast Guard Academy mixed-funded athletic or recreational extracurricular program" means an athletic or recreational extracurricular program of the Coast Guard Academy to which each of the following applies:

(1) The program is not considered a morale, welfare, or recreation program.

(2) The program is supported through appropriated funds.

(3) The program is supported by a nonappropriated fund instrumentality.

(4) The program is not a private organization and is not operated by a private organization.

(Added Pub. L. 117–263, div. K, title CXII, §11250(a), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 4051.)
Exhibit
13.1




PRINCIPAL
EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION




PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350








In
connection with this Annual Report of Frontline Ltd. (the "Company") on Form
20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jens Martin Jensen, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




A signed
original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.




Date:
April 30, 2009








/s/ Jens
Martin Jensen




Jens
Martin Jensen




Principal
Executive Officer
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****President�sbudget**** 
SuDocNumber:Y3.C 73/5:2/B 85/
ItemNumber: 0039 (online)
CGPSystem Number:000601015
 
2001
2002
2003**
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1341 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1341

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand the applicability 
   of section 179 which permits the expensing of certain depreciable 
                                assets.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              July 1, 1999

Mr. Dorgan (for himself, Mr. Lott, Mr. Daschle, Mr. Nickles, Mr. Reid, 
  Mr. Murkowski, Mr. Conrad, Mr. Breaux, Mr. Graham, Mr. Kerrey, Mr. 
Hagel, Mr. Harkin, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Schumer, Mr. Cochran, Mr. Craig, Mr. 
 Brownback, Mr. Wellstone, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Campbell, Mr. Johnson, Mr. 
  Bingaman, Mr. Mack, Mr. Domenici, Mr. Bennett, Mr. Santorum and Mr. 
Leahy) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 
                      to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand the applicability 
   of section 179 which permits the expensing of certain depreciable 
                                assets.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

     This Act may be cited as the ``Main Street Business Incentive Act 
of 1999''.

SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF EXPENSING TREATMENT FOR SMALL BUSINESSES.

    (a) Acceleration of Increase in Dollar Limit.--Section 179(b)(1) of 
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to dollar limits on 
expensing treatment) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(1) Dollar limitation.--The aggregate cost which may be 
        taken into account under subsection (a) for any taxable year 
        shall not exceed $25,000.''
    (b) Expensing Available for All Tangible Depreciable Property.--
Section 179(d)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining 
section 179 property) is amended by striking ``which is section 1245 
property (as defined in section 1245(a)(3)) and''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1998.
                                 <all>
```