alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OMB Approval Number 

0575-0174 

GUARANTEED RURAL RENTAL HOUSING PROGRAM 

ORIGINATION AND SERVICING HANDBOOK 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

RURAL HOUSING SERVICE 

1400 INDEPENDENCE AVENUE, S.W. 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20410 

According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a 

collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 0575-

0174. The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to range from 5 minutes to 2 hours per response, including the time 

for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the 

collection of information. 

(12-18-998 SPECIAL PN 

Revised (07-16-99) SPECIAL PN
§ 93.600 Importation of dogs. ( a ) *All dogs.* Dogs from any region of the world where screwworm is considered to exist may only be imported into the United States if they meet the requirements of paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this section and all other applicable requirements of this part. APHIS maintains a list of regions where screwworm is considered to exist on the APHIS website at *https://www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/animalhealth/animal-and-animal-product-import-information/animal-health-status-of-regions*. Copies of the list can be obtained via postal mail or email upon request to Regionalization Evaluation Services, Strategy and Policy, Veterinary Services, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, 4700 River Road, Unit 38, Riverdale, Maryland 20737; *AskRegionalization@usda.gov*. APHIS will add a region to the list upon determining that screwworm exists in the region based on reports APHIS receives of detections of the pest from veterinary officials of the exporting country, from the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE), or from other sources the Administrator determines to be reliable. APHIS will remove a region from the list after conducting an evaluation of the region in accordance with § 92.2 of this subchapter and finding that screwworm is not present in the region. In the case of a region formerly not on this list that is added due to a detection, the region may be removed from the list in accordance with the procedures for reestablishment of a region's disease-free status in § 92.4 of this subchapter. ( 1 ) Dogs must be accompanied by a certificate signed by a full-time salaried veterinary official of the region of origin stating that the dog has been inspected for screwworm within 5 days preceding its shipment to the United States.
( 2 ) The certificate must state that the dog is either free from screwworm or was found to be infested with screwworm and was held in quarantine and treated until free from screwworm prior to leaving the region of origin.
( b ) *Dogs for handling livestock.* Collie, Shepherd, and other dogs that are imported from any part of the world except Canada, Mexico, and regions of Central America and the West Indies and that are to be used in the handling of sheep or other livestock must be inspected and quarantined at the port of entry for a sufficient time to determine their freedom from tapeworm (*Taenia* spp.). If found to be infested with tapeworm, dogs must be treated under the supervision of an inspector at the port of entry until they are free from infestation.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0165) [65 FR 67623, Nov. 13, 2000, as amended at 67 FR 11565, Mar. 15, 2002; 73 FR 50878, Aug. 29, 2008; 77 FR 1391, Jan. 10, 2012; 86 FR 45625, Aug. 16, 2021]
# C_2010179EN.01005201.xml

| 3.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/52

---

Action brought on 4 May 2010 — Cervecería Modelo v OHIM — Plataforma Continental (LA VICTORIA DE MEXICO)

(Case T-205/10)

(2010/C 179/89)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Cervecería Modelo, SA de CV (represented by: C. Lema Devesa, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Plataforma Continental, SL (Madrid, Spain)

Form of order sought

| — | Annul partially the decision of 5 March 2010 (Case R/322/2009-2) of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, solely to the extent that it refuses registration of the mark ‘LA VICTORIA DE MÉXICO’ for goods in Class 32 of the Classification and, consequently declare that its registration can proceed, and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul partially the decision of 5 March 2010 (Case R/322/2009-2) of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, solely to the extent that it refuses registration of the mark ‘LA VICTORIA DE MÉXICO’ for goods in Class 32 of the Classification and, consequently declare that its registration can proceed, and

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Cervecería.

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘LA VICTORIA DE MÉXICO’ (application for registration No 4 551 214) for goods and services in Classes 25, 32 and 43.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: PLATAFORMA CONTINENTAL S.L.

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community figurative mark containing the word element ‘VICTORIA’ (No 2 632 271) for goods in Classes 31, 32 and 33; and Spanish word mark ‘VICTORIA’ (No 1 648 564) for goods in Class 32.

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejection of the opposition in its entirety

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Partial annulment of the decision under appeal and partial refusal of the application for registration.

Pleas in law: Incorrect interpretation and application of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 on the Community trade mark.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.30



September 8, 1999



Jeff Arnold
Cambridge Heart, Inc.
One Oak Park Drive
Bedford, MA  01730

Dear Jeff:

The Compensation Committee of the Cambridge Heart Board of Directors met to
review and propose changes to your compensation.  We have agreed on the
following:

1.  Contract:  Renew for three years
    --------

2.  Base Salary:  Increase to $215,000
    ------------

3.  Bonus Potential: Increase to 50% of base salary, based on achievement of
    ---------------
    milestones approved by the Board.

4.  Immediate Stock Option Grant: 100,000 shares vesting over four years,
    ----------------------------
    consistent with the company's stock option plan.

5.  Annual Stock Option Grant: Maximum of 65,000 shares, decided by the Board at
    -------------------------
    year-end based on achievement of milestones:

    .  Raising an additional $5MM

    .  Release of Treadmill TWA and SAECG prior to end of October

    .  Signing an OEM deal with Marquette, Quinton or Spacelabs prior
       to the end of 1999

    .  Start of a prophylactic ICD pilot with funding from Medtronic,
       Guidant or St. Jude or commitment of funding for the full
       study prior to the end of 1999

    .  30 Domestic sites buying at least 300 electrode sets per
       month in Q4

    .  Assessment for RBRVS units complete; on agenda for ACC or
       NASPE reimbursement committee; 50 submissions for reimbursement
Limited Power of Attorney - Securities Law Compliance


The undersigned, as a director of Solectron Corporation,
(the "Corporation"), hereby constitutes and appoints Michael Grady,
Tim Chu, or Victoria Miranda the undersigned's true and lawful
attorney-in-fact and agent to complete and execute such Forms 3, 4
and 5 and other forms as such attorney-in-fact shall, in his or her
discretion, determine to be required or advisable pursuant to Section
16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (as amended) and the
rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, or any successor laws and
regulations, as a consequence of the undersigned's ownership,
acquisition or disposition of securities of the Corporation, and to
do all acts necessary in order to file such forms with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, any securities exchange or national
association, the Corporation and such other person or agency as the
attorney-in-fact shall deem appropriate. The undersigned hereby
ratifies and confirms all that said attorney-in-fact and agent shall
do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.


This Limited Power of Attorney is executed at Milpitas, California,
as of the date set forth below.



			Signature:	S/ Cyril Yansouni

			Type or Print Name:	Cyril Yansouni

			Dated: 	January 8, 2004






Witness:

Signature:	S/ Leslee Guardino


Type or Print Name:	Leslee Guardino


Dated: January 8, 2004
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Announces Intent to Establish an Equity Commission, Solicits 

Nominations for Membership

WASHINGTON, Oct. 8, 2021 – United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) announced it will establish 

an Equity Commission and is requesting nominations for membership on the Equity Commission Advisory 

Committee and Equity Commission Subcommittee on Agriculture. The notice represents an important step 

towards implementing President Biden’s commitment to create an Equity Commission and the American 

Rescue Plan Act provision that directs USDA to “address historical discrimination and disparities in the 

agriculture sector... [through] one or more equity commissions to address racial equity issues within USDA and 

its programs.”

The Equity Commission will advise the Secretary of Agriculture by identifying USDA programs, policies, 

systems, structures, and practices that contribute to barriers to inclusion or access, systemic discrimination, or 

exacerbate or perpetuate racial, economic, health and social disparities. The Subcommittee on Agriculture will 

be formed concurrently and will report back to the Equity Commission and provide recommendations on issues 

of concern related to agriculture. Subsequent subcommittees will focus on other policy areas, such as rural 

community and economic development. The Equity Commission will deliver an interim report and provide 

actionable recommendations no later than 12 months after inception. A final report will be generated within a 

two-year timeframe.

USDA is soliciting nominations to consider membership on both the Equity Commission and the Subcommittee 

on Agriculture. Both seek to reflect a diversity in demographics, regions of the country, background, and in 

experience and expertise. USDA Rural Development strongly encourages leaders in community-based 

organizations including community development finance institutions, colleges and universities (tribal and 

historically black colleges and universities), and rural mission-driven non-profits that represent underserved 

communities in rural areas to apply.

Nominations will be considered that are submitted via email or postmarked by Oct. 27, 2021. 

Please submit nominations to Dr. Dewayne L. Goldmon, USDA Senior Advisor for Racial Equity, Office of the 

Secretary, Department of Agriculture, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Room 6006-S, Washington, DC 20250; 

or send by email to: EquityCommission@usda.gov. A federal official of USDA will acknowledge receipt of 

nominations.

For further information, contact Dewayne L. Goldmon, Ph.D., by phone at (202) 997-2100 or email at

dewayne.goldmon@usda.gov.

For more information read the press release and Federal Register notice.
###

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
[*] Denotes  information  for which  confidential  treatment has been requested.
Confidential portions ommited have been filed separately with the Commission.

       FIRST AMENDMENT TO RESTATED DRAM LICENSE AND COOPERATION AGREEMENT

         This First Amendment to Restated DRAM License and Cooperation Agreement
("Amendment")  is entered  into as of March 26,  1996,  by and between  Alliance
Semiconductor  Corporation, a Delaware Corporation with its principal offices at
3099 North First Street, San Jose,  California,  tel. (408) 383-4900;  fax (408)
383-4990  (collectively,  Alliance  Semiconductor  Corporation  and  its  Taiwan
subsidiar(ies) will be referred to as "Alliance"),  and United  Microelectronics
Corporation,  a Taiwan Corporation with its principal place of business at No. 3
Innovation Road,  Science Based Industrial Park Hsin-Chu City,  Taiwan,  R.O.C.,
tel. (035) 782-258; fax (035) 774-767 ("UMC").

WHEREAS Alliance and UMC wish to amend the Restated DRAM License and Cooperation
Agreement dated as of February 28, 1996 ("Restated DRAM Agreement") to state the
terms and conditions upon which [*] pursuant to the Restated DRAM Agreement;

ACCORDINGLY,  the Restated DRAM Agreement is amended to add new paragraph 2.7 as
follows:

"2.7     Subject  to the  terms  and  conditions  and  during  the  term of this
         Agreement, UMC shall [*]:

         (a)      [*];
         (b)      [*]; and
         (c)      [*];

provided however that except as [*].  Notwithstanding  anything to the contrary,
UMC shall [*]."

         The  parties  have  duly  authorized   their   respective   undersigned
representatives  to execute this  Amendment and bind them to its terms as of the
date set forth above.


ALLIANCE SEMICONDUCTOR CORP.                      UNITED MICROELECTRONICS CORP.

/s/ N. D. Reddy                                   /s/ M. K. Tsai
-----------------------------                     ----------------------------
Authorized Signature                              Authorized Signature
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 5005 

To require pension plans subject to the requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 to establish minimum standards 

to address the threat from investments that finance Communist Chinese 

military companies. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 10, 2020 

Mrs. BLACKBURN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To require pension plans subject to the requirements of 

the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 

to establish minimum standards to address the threat 

from investments that finance Communist Chinese military companies. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Defending Pensions 

5 from the Chinese Communist Threat Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 5005 IS

1 SEC. 2. ADDRESSING THE THREAT FROM INVESTMENTS 

2 THAT FINANCE COMMUNIST CHINESE MILI3 TARY COMPANIES. 

4 Not later than one year after the date of enactment 

5 of this Act, the Secretary of Labor, in consultation with 

6 the Secretary of Defense and, as the Secretary of Labor 

7 determines appropriate, heads of other Federal agencies, 

8 shall prohibit pension plans (as defined in section 3 of the 

9 Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (29 

10 U.S.C. 1002)) from investing in any persons on the list 

11 of Communist Chinese military companies under section 

12 1237(b) of the Strom Thurmond National Defense Au13 thorization Act of Fiscal Year 1999 (Public Law 105–261; 

14 50 U.S.C. 1702 note). 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
#### § 381.28 Report of violations.

Each inspector, agent, representative, or employee of the Inspection Service shall report, in the manner prescribed by the Administrator, all violations of the Act and noncompliance with the regulations of which he has knowledge.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. RA M O N A G U STI N SA LA SC O N T R E R A S , a. k. a. A gu st i n S al as C o n treras, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 10- 10034 D. C . No . 2 : 0 8 - c r - 0 0 2 5 2 - J AT ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A r i z ona J a m e s A . T e i l bor g, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d O c t obe r19, 2010 ** B efo re: O ’ S C A N N L A IN , T A L L M A N , an d B E A , C i rcu i tJu d g es. R am on A gu st i n S al as -C on tre ra s app ea l s f rom the 18 -m on th sent ence i m pos e d upon r e voc a t i on of s upe rvi s e d r e l e a s e . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 , a n d w e a f f irm . 

# FI LED OC T 28 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 10034 2 T he r e c or d r e f

l e c t s the di s tr i c tc ourtdi d notpr oc e dur a l l ye rr , a nd the s e nt e nc e i m pos e d i s s ubs t a nt i ve l yr e a s onabl e unde rthe t ot a l i tyof the c ir c u m s ta n c e s . Se e U

n ite d S ta te s v . Ca r ty , 52 0 F . 3d 98 4, 99 3 (9th C i r. 20 08 ) ( en b a n c ) . T h e d i stri ctco u rtd i d n o tab u se i t s d i scret i o n i n rev o k i n g su p erv i sed rel ease ba s e d on as i ngl e G r a de C vi ol a t i on. U nde rthe pl a i n l a ngua ge of the s t a tut e a nd th e r e le v a n t s e n te n c in g g u id e lin e s , th e c o u rt h a d au th o r ityto r e v o k e o n th a t b a s is . See 18 U . S . C . § 3 58 3(e) (3) ( al l ow i ng di stri ctcourtt o revok e at erm of supervi se d r e l e a s e and r e qui r e the de f e nda ntt o s e rve i n pr i s on a l l orpa rtof the t e rm of s upe rvi s e d r e l e a s e author i z e d bys t a tut e i f i tf i nds tha tthe de f

e nda ntvi ol a t e d a c o n d itio n o f

s u p e rv is e d r e le a s e ) ; U .S .S .G . § 7 B 1 .3 ( a ) ( 2 ) ( A ) ( P o lic yS ta te m e n t) (s t at i ng thatthe courtm ayre vo ke supervi se d rel ea se up on fi nd i ng a G ra de C v i o l at i o n ). F u rth erm o re, u n d er th e ci rcu m st an ces, th e d i stri ctco u rtd i d n o tab u se it s d iscr etio n in im p o sin g a s en ten ce ab o v e th e S en ten cin g C o m m issio n ’s r e c o m m e n d e d s e n te n c in g r a n g e o f 7 to 1 3 m o n th s . Se e U ni te d State s v . Si m tob , 4 8 5 F . 3 d 1 0 5 8 , 1 0 6 3 (9 th C i r. 2 0 0 7 ) (w h ere d efen d an tv i o l at es su p erv i sed rel ease by com m i tt i ng a s i m i l aroffe nse t o thatfor w hi ch he w as pl ac ed on supervi se d r e le a s e , “g r e a te rs a n c tio n s m a yb e r e q u ir e d to d e te rf u tu r e c r im in a l a c tiv ity ” ) . A FFI R M ED .
# C_2013156EN.01004203.xml

| 1.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/42

---

Order of the General Court of 9 April 2013 — British Sugar v Commission

(Case T-86/10) (1)

1

(Agriculture - Sugar - Production levies - Annulment and declaration of invalidity in part of Regulation (EC) No 1193/2009 after bringing of the action - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 156/79

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: British Sugar plc (London (United Kingdom)) (represented by: initially by K. Lasok QC, G. Facenna, Barrister, W. Robinson, P. Doris and D. Das, Solicitors, then by K. Lasok QC, G. Facenna, W. Robinson and D. Das)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Banks and P. Rossi, Agents)

Defendant:

Interveners in support of the applicants: Kingdom of Spain (represented: initially by F. Díez Moreno, then by A. Rubio González, abogados del Estado); and Republic of Lithuania (represented by: R. Janeckaitė and R. Krasuckaitė, Agents)

Interveners in support of the applicants:

Interveners in support of the defendant: Republic of Latvia (represented by: K. Drēviņa and K. Krasovska, Agents); and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented: initially by S. Behzadi-Spencer and S. Hathaway, and then by Behzadi-Spencer and A. Robinson, Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1193/2009 of 3 November 2009 correcting Regulations (EC) No 1762/2003, (EC) No 1775/2004, (EC) No 1686/2005, (EC) No 164/2007 and fixing the production levies in the sugar sector for marketing years 2002/2003, 2003/2004, 2004/2005, 2005/2006 (OJ 2009 L 321, p. 1)

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no need to adjudicate on this action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no need to adjudicate on this action.

| 2. | The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay the costs of British Sugar plc. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay the costs of British Sugar plc.

| 3. | The Kingdom of Spain, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland shall bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Kingdom of Spain, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland shall bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 113, 1.5.2010.

1

---
Exhibit 11

                            WEST ESSEX BANCORP, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               Three Months Ended                 Nine Months Ended
                                                                  September 30,                      September 30,
                                                         ----------------------------        ----------------------------
                                                             2000             1999              2000              1999
                                                         ----------        ----------        ----------        ----------
<S>                                                      <C>               <C>               <C>               <C>
Net income                                               $  823,010        $  783,392        $2,523,747        $2,268,664
                                                         ==========        ==========        ==========        ==========

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding      3,843,058         4,009,842         3,853,610         4,048,571

Common stock equivalents due to dilutive effect
  of stock options and other dilutive securities             16,253             8,046             5,418             2,682
                                                         ----------        ----------        ----------        ----------

Total weighted average number of common shares
  and common share equivalents outstanding                3,859,311         4,017,888         3,859,028         4,051,253
                                                         ==========        ==========        ==========        ==========

Basic earnings per common share                          $     0.21        $     0.20        $     0.65        $     0.56

Diluted earnings per common share                        $     0.21        $     0.19        $     0.65        $     0.56
</TABLE>