alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 590.435 Use of food ingredients and approval of materials. ( a ) ( 1 ) No substance which is a “food additive” as defined under 21 U.S.C. 321(s), including sources of radiation, may be used in the processing of egg products unless this use is authorized under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
( 2 ) No substance which is intended to impart color in any egg product may be used unless such use is authorized under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
( 3 ) Substances and ingredients used in the processing of egg products capable of use as human food must be clean, wholesome, and unadulterated.
( b ) Substances permitted for use in egg products in subsection(a) will be permitted for such use under this chapter, subject to declaration requirements in § 424.22(c) of this chapter and § 590.411, unless precluded from such use or further restricted in this chapter. Such substances must be safe and effective under conditions of use and not result in the adulteration of product. The Administrator may require, in addition to listing the ingredients, a declaration of the additive and the purpose of its use.
( c ) Substances to be used in the processing of egg products must be safe under the conditions of their intended use and in amounts sufficient to accomplish their intended purpose. Such substances may not promote deception or cause the product to be otherwise adulterated or unwholesome. Scientific data showing the additive meets the above specified criteria must be maintained and made available to FSIS inspection program personnel.
[85 FR 68679, Oct. 29, 2020]
| **Condensed Consolidating Financial Information - Narrative (Details)**          | Sep. 30, 2016 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------|
| **Condensed Financial Information of Parent Company Only Disclosure [Abstract]** |          |
| Senior secured leverage ratio maximum                                            | 1.75          |
| Consolidated coverage ratio minimum                                              | 2             |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Minimum consolidated coverage ratio to permit the declaration and payment of dividends under senior note indenture.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**hls_Consolidatedcoverageratiominimum**Namespace Prefix:**hls_**Data Type:**xbrli:pureItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**instant |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Max senior secured leverage ratio to permit unlimited restricted payments under credit agreement.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**hls_Seniorsecuredleverageratiomaximum**Namespace Prefix:**hls_**Data Type:**xbrli:pureItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**instant |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_CondensedFinancialInformationOfParentCompanyOnlyDisclosureAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
# C_2011046EN.01000301.xml

| 12.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/3

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de Cassation (France) lodged on 22 November 2010 — Refcomp SpA v Axa Corporate Solutions Assurance SA, Axa France IARD, Emerson Network, Climaveneta SpA

(Case C-543/10)

2011/C 46/04

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Cour de Cassation

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Refcomp SpA

Applicant:

Defendants: Axa Corporate Solutions Assurance, Axa France IARD, Emerson Network, Climaveneta SpA

Defendants:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Is a clause conferring jurisdiction which has been agreed, in a chain of contracts under Community law, between a manufacturer of goods and a buyer in accordance with Article 23 of Regulation No 44/2001 of 20 December 2000 (1) effective as against the sub-buyer and, if so, under what conditions? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is a clause conferring jurisdiction which has been agreed, in a chain of contracts under Community law, between a manufacturer of goods and a buyer in accordance with Article 23 of Regulation No 44/2001 of 20 December 2000 (1) effective as against the sub-buyer and, if so, under what conditions?

1

| 2. | Is the clause conferring jurisdiction effective as against the sub-buyer and its subrogated insurers even if Article 5(1) of Regulation No 44/2001 of 20 December 2000 does not apply to the sub-buyer’s action against the manufacturer, as the Court held in its judgment of 17 June 1992 in Handte
   (2)? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is the clause conferring jurisdiction effective as against the sub-buyer and its subrogated insurers even if Article 5(1) of Regulation No 44/2001 of 20 December 2000 does not apply to the sub-buyer’s action against the manufacturer, as the Court held in its judgment of 17 June 1992 in Handte
   (2)?

Handte

2

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2001 L 12, p. 1)

1

(2)  Judgment of 17 June 1992, Handte, C-26/91, ECR 1992, p. I-03967

2

Handte

---
#### § 3.130 Watering.

If potable water is not accessible to the animals at all times, it must be provided as often as necessary for the health and comfort of the animal. Frequency of watering shall consider age, species, condition, size, and type of the animal. All water receptacles shall be kept clean and sanitary.
# C_2011095EN.01000201.xml

| 26.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/2

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bayerischer Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 15 December 2010 — Wolfgang Köppl v Freistaat Bayern

(Case C-590/10)

2011/C 95/02

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bayerischer Verwaltungsgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Wolfgang Köppl

Applicant:

Defendant: Freistaat Bayern

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Are Article 1(2) and Article 8(2) and (4) of Directive 91/439/EEC (1) — with particular regard to Article 2(1) and Article 3(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — to be interpreted as meaning that a Member State (the ‘host Member State’) is entitled not to recognise a Category B driving licence which another Member State (‘the issuing Member State’) has issued to a person on whom the host Member State has imposed prior measures within the meaning of Article 8(2) of Directive 91/439/EEC and which driving licence is on the face of the document itself in breach of the residence requirement of Article 7(1)(b) of Directive 91/439/EEC, if that person has subsequently obtained in the issuing Member State a Category C driving licence which is not on the face of that driving licence in breach of the residence requirement? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Are Article 1(2) and Article 8(2) and (4) of Directive 91/439/EEC (1) — with particular regard to Article 2(1) and Article 3(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — to be interpreted as meaning that a Member State (the ‘host Member State’) is entitled not to recognise a Category B driving licence which another Member State (‘the issuing Member State’) has issued to a person on whom the host Member State has imposed prior measures within the meaning of Article 8(2) of Directive 91/439/EEC and which driving licence is on the face of the document itself in breach of the residence requirement of Article 7(1)(b) of Directive 91/439/EEC, if that person has subsequently obtained in the issuing Member State a Category C driving licence which is not on the face of that driving licence in breach of the residence requirement?

1

| 2. | If the answer to that question is in the affirmative, can the host Member State refuse to recognise the Category C driving licence issued to that person? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the answer to that question is in the affirmative, can the host Member State refuse to recognise the Category C driving licence issued to that person?

---

(1)  Council Directive 91/439/EEC of 29 July 1991 on driving licences (OJ 1991 L 237, p. 1).

1

---
# C_2013026EN.01004501.xml

| 26.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/45

---

Order of the General Court of 23 November 2012 — Crocs v OHIM — Holey Soles Holdings and PHI (Representation of footwear )

(Case T-302/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Invalidity action - Withdrawal of the invalidity action - No need to adjudicate)

2013/C 26/87

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Crocs, Inc. (Niwot, United States of America) (represented by: I.R. Craig, solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Hanne, agent)

Defendant:

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Holey Soles Holdings Ltd (Vancouver, Canada; and Partenaire Hospitalier International (La Haie Foissière, France)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 March 2010 (Case R 9/2008-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between Holey Shoes Holdings Ltd and Partenaire Hospitalier International and Crocs, Inc.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | The applicant shall bear it own costs and those incurred by the defendant. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant shall bear it own costs and those incurred by the defendant.

---

(1)  OJ C 260, 25.9.2010.

1

---
### §§751 to 757. Repealed. Pub. L. 92–181, title V, §5.26(a), Dec. 10, 1971, 85 Stat. 624

Section 751, acts July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §10(a), 39 Stat. 369; Apr. 20, 1920, ch. 154, §2, 41 Stat. 570; June 30, 1945, ch. 204, §2, 59 Stat. 266; Aug. 18, 1959, Pub. L. 86–168, title I, §102(b), 73 Stat. 384, covered investigation of applications for mortgage loans by the loan committee. See section 2033 of this title.

Section 752, acts July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §10(b), 39 Stat. 369; Apr. 20, 1920, ch. 154, §2, 41 Stat. 570; June 30, 1945, ch. 204, §2, 59 Stat. 266; Aug. 18, 1959, Pub. L. 86–168, title I, §102(b), 73 Stat. 385, covered submission of loan applications and required reports to land banks. See section 2033 of this title.

Section 753, acts July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §10(c), 39 Stat. 369; June 30, 1945, ch. 204, §2, 59 Stat. 266; Aug. 18, 1959, Pub. L. 86–168, title I, §102(b), 73 Stat. 385, provided for form for appraisal reports.

Section 754, acts July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §10(d), 39 Stat. 369; Aug. 18, 1959, Pub. L. 86–168, title I, §102(b), 73 Stat. 385, dealt with conflicting interests of farm credit or land bank appraisers, committeemen, and association directors. See section 2254 of this title.

Section 755, acts July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §10(e), 39 Stat. 369; Ex. Ord. No. 6084, Mar. 27, 1933; Aug. 18, 1959, Pub. L. 86–168, title I, §102(b), 73 Stat. 385, provided for appraisal standards studies by Federal land banks. See section 2033 of this title.

Section 756, acts July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §10(f), 39 Stat. 369; Aug. 18, 1959, Pub. L. 86–168, title I, §102(b), 73 Stat. 385, covered appraisals, reports, and standards by farm credit appraisers. See section 2012 of this title.

Section 757, act July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §10(g), as added Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 785, title III, §303, 69 Stat. 664; amended Aug. 18, 1959, Pub. L. 86–168, title I, §102(b), 73 Stat. 385, set out duties of farm credit appraisers. See section 2254 of this title.
UNITED STATES
 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C.
20549
  FORM
6-K
 
 Report of Foreign
Issuer
  Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16
of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
  
 For the month of February,
2008
 Commission File No.
1-9987
 
  
 
 B
+ H  O C E A N C A R R I E R S, L T D.
  
 
 
 3rdFloor,
Par La Ville Place
 14 Par-La-Ville
Road
 Hamilton HM JX
Bermuda
 (Address
of principal executive offices)
  
   
 
 Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under
cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.
 
 Form
20-F X   Form
40-F
 
 Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted
by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1):
  Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted
by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7):
 
 Indicate
by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this Form, the
registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant
to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
 
 Yes    NoX
  
   INFORMATION
CONTAINED IN THIS FORM 6-K REPORT
  
 Set forth herein as Exhibit 99.1 is a Press Release
Announcing Preliminary Unaudited Results for the Fourth Quarterly
Period and Year Ending December 31, 2007
 
 
 
  
  
 Signatures
 
 
 Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
  
 Date  February 22, 2008
 B+H Ocean Carriers,
Ltd.
 By:  /s/ Michael S.
Hudner
 Chief
Executive Officer
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 21.1 SUBSIDIARIES

The subsidiaries of Clarus Corporation are:

Clarus International, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Clarus eMEA, Ltd., a U.K. corporation
Clarus CSA, Inc., a Delaware corporation
SAI (Ireland) Limited, limited company incorporated under the laws of Ireland
SAI Recruitment Limited, limited company incorporated under the laws of
Ireland
i2Mobile.com Limited, limited company incorporated under the laws of Ireland
SAI America Limited, limited company incorporated under the laws of Ireland
Software Architects International, LLC (Ireland)
REDEO Technologies, LLC (Delaware)
JAI (AMERICA) LLC (Delaware)

                                       61
ASSIGNMENT
        OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

      


      This
        ASSIGNMENT OF INTELLECUTAL PROPERTY (“Assignment”) is made and entered into as
        of June
        9, 2008
        (the
“Effective Date”), by and between Southern
        Sauce Company, Inc. (“Assignor”),
        and Michael Jordan (“Assignee”).

      


      RECITALS

      


      A.
         Assignor
        is the owner of certain intellectual property rights, including the trade
        names,
        logos, copyrights, service marks, and/or trademarks, listed on Schedule
        A
        hereto
        (the “Intellectual Property”).

      


      B.
         Pursuant
        to the terms of this Assignment, Assignor desires to assign Assignor's right,
        title, and interest in the Intellectual Property to Assignee, and Assignee
        desires to accept the assignment and assume all of the obligations associated
        with the Intellectual Property.

      


      NOW,
        THEREFORE, in consideration of the payment and delivery to Assignor of all
        monies and instruments to be paid and delivered to Assignor by Assignee pursuant
        to the terms of this Assignment, the receipt of which Assignor acknowledges,
        Assignor and Assignee agree as follows:

      


      1.
         Assignment
        and Sale of Intellectual Property.
        Upon
        receipt of $100.00 from Assignee, Assignor sells, assigns and transfers to
        Assignee all of its right, title, and interest in and to the Intellectual
        Property as of the Effective Date.

      


      2.
         Acceptance
        of Assignment and Obligations.
        Assignee agrees to and accepts the purchase and assignment of the Intellectual
        Property.

      


      3. Further
        Assurance.
        Assignor shall execute such written instruments, extend such other
        cooperation and perform such other acts as may be necessary or advisable,
        including without limitation, making all required filings with the United
        States
        Patent and Trademark Office to register a trademark and hereby irrevocably
        appoints Assignee as Assignor's attorney in fact to undertake such acts in
        Assignor's name. 

       

      4. Counterparts. This
        Assignment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall
        be
        deemed an original. The counterparts shall together constitute but one
        agreement.

       

      IN
        WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Assignment as of the Effective
        Date.

      


      Southern
        Sauce Company, Inc. 

       

      
        	
                /s/
                  John Vogel

              	 
	
                John
                  Vogel, CEO

              	 


      

       

      
        	
                /s/
                  Michael Jordan

              	 
	
                Michael
                  Jordan
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-2247

AKIEM BARBER; MARCEL BARBER,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

RUSHMORE LOAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC; EMC MORTGAGE, 

LLC,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Columbia. Terry L. Wooten, Senior District Judge. (3:17-cv-00982-TLW)

Submitted: April 25, 2019 Decided: April 29, 2019

Before FLOYD and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Akiem Barber, Marcel Barber, Appellants Pro Se. Damon C. Wlodarczyk, RILEY, 

POPE & LANEY, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Akiem Barber and Marcel Barber appeal the district court’s order adopting the 

magistrate judge’s recommendation and granting summary judgment in favor of the 

Defendants in their civil suit. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Barber v. Rushmore 

Loan Mgmt. Servs., LLC, No. 3:17-cv-00982-TLW (D.S.C. Sept. 19, 2018). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in 

the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2010134EN.01003701.xml

| 22.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 134/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/37

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 26 March 2010 — Sviluppo Globale v Commission

(Case T-6/10 R)

(Interim measures - Public contracts - Tendering procedure - Rejection of tender - Application for suspension of operation and interim measures - Loss of opportunity - Lack of serious and irreparable harm - Lack of urgency)

2010/C 134/63

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Sviluppo Globale GEIE (Rome, Italy) (represented by: F. Sciaudone, R. Sciaudone and A. Neri, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Costa de Oliveira, F. Erlbacher and P. Manzini, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for interim measures concerning call for tenders EUROPEAID/127843/D/SER/KOS for the provision of support services to the customs and tax authorities in Kosovo.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.50


Summary of Donna A. Henderson Compensation Arrangement


The board of directors of Archrock, Inc. (the “Company”) appointed Donna A. Henderson as Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company effective January 1, 2016.  Prior to this appointment, Ms. Henderson served as the Vice President, Accounting of the Company’s operating subsidiary since August 2015. 


On July 31, 2015, Ms. Henderson entered into an employment letter with the Company (the “Employment Letter”), which describes the terms and conditions of her employment.  The table below summarizes the compensation arrangement of Ms. Henderson as set forth in the Employment Letter.


	
		
	Base Salary
	$260,000 per year

	Target Short-Term Incentive
	36% of Base Salary

	Annual Equity Award Value
	$135,000

	Sign-On Bonus
	$50,000
### Formation