1

Ogulei, David

From: Mooney, John

Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 8:07 AM

To: Damico, Genevieve; Ogulei, David

Subject: FW: Response to comments in Docket ID No. EPA-R05-OAR-2014-0280

Attachments: CES Response to Veolia Comments to replace EPA-R05-OAR-2014-0280-0113_Mar 27 2015 

REVISED.pdf

From: Andrea Geiger [mailto:andreag@cooperenvironmental.com] 

Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 7:34 PM 

To: Mooney, John 

Subject: RE: Response to comments in Docket ID No. EPA-R05-OAR-2014-0280 

Hello Mr. Mooney, 

I have attached the revised version of the document to replace the February 18, 2015-posted 

commentary (with erroneous reference removed; ID# EPA-R05-OAR-2014-0280-0113). If there 

is a different process to go through to revise the currently posted document, please let me 

know. I appreciate your help with making this correction. The only changes are the removal of 

two sentences from page 3 and a reference in the Works Cited section on page 14. Let me know 

what else you may need from me to make this revision. 

Thanks, 

Andrea 

971-777-4892 

andreag@cooperenvironmental.com 

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential information intended solely for the use of the 

addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, any distribution, copying, or use of this e-mail or its attachments 

is prohibited. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete this message and any 

copies. Thank you. 

From: Andrea Geiger [mailto:andreag@cooperenvironmental.com] 

Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 9:52 AM 

To: mooney.john@epa.gov 

Subject: Re: Response to comments in Docket ID No. EPA-R05-OAR-2014-0280 

Importance: High 

Dear Mr. Mooney, 

I will need to correct a reference in the submission I sent in on February 10th (see email below). What do I need to do to make 

corrections? In any case, we will need to have the current version of our February 10, 2015 commentary included in the online

docket removed as soon as possible. If we can get that document pulled, I will make the revisions and re-send it as soon as 

possible. Your help with this matter is greatly appreciated. 

Kind Regards, 

Andrea Geiger 

Senior Environmental Scientist

Cooper Environmental Services, LLC
2

971-777-4892 

From: Andrea Geiger <andreag@cooperenvironmental.com> 

Organization: Cooper Environmental Services, LLC 

Date: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 6:05 PM 

To: <mooney.john@epa.gov> 

Cc: 'Krag Petterson' <kragp@cooperenvironmental.com>, John Cooper <johnc@cooperenvironmental.com>, 

<Czerniak.george@Epa.gov> 

Subject: Response to comments in Docket ID No. EPA-R05-OAR-2014-0280 

Dear Mr. Mooney,

Following our review of the various commentary submitted with regard to the Draft Title V CAA Permit for 

Veolia ES Technical Solutions, there appeared to be a number of technical issues that required clarification with 

regard to the multi-metals CEMS requirement. The attached document, prepared by Cooper Environmental 

Services, LLC, is intended to explain technical aspects of the Xact 640 Multi-Metals CEMS and dispel some 

inaccuracies we found in the comments pertaining to our instrument and transport system. We understand that 

no response to this submittal will be provided to us by the EPA; nonetheless, we consider the attached

document important in providing support of the technical and scientific integrity of our multi-metals monitoring 

instrumentation and in supporting the validity of EPA’s multi-metal monitoring requirement in the draft permit. 

If you or your colleagues should have any questions pertaining to the attached document or our December 19, 

2014 commentary to Veolia’s draft Title V Permit, please contact me using the information provided in my 

signature block below. We truly appreciate your time and attention to our contribution in this area.

Sincerely,