alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.4



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with
the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Five Oaks Investment Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period
ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
David Oston, as Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary (principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: April 29, 2016 | /s/ David Oston                                                                                                 
|-------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     | David Oston                                                                                                     
|                     | Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
 (principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)



A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to Five Oaks Investment Corp. and will be retained by it and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2007096EN.01003002.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/30

---

Judgment of the Tribunal of First Instance of 29 March 2007 — Département du Loiret v Commission

(Case T-369/00) (1)

1

(State aid - Land sale price - Decision ordering the recovery of aid incompatible with the common market - Present-day value of the aid - Compound interest - Statement of reasons)

(2007/C 96/64)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Département du Loiret (France) (represented by: A. Carnelutti, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Rozet and J. Flett, Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the applicant: Scott SA (Saint-Cloud (France), (represented by: Sir Jeremy Lever QC, J. Gardner and G. Peretz, Barristers and R. Griffith and M. Papadakis, Solicitors)

Intervener in support of the applicant:

Re:

Partial annulument of Commission Decision 2002/14/EC of 12 July 2000 on the State aid granted by France to Scott Paper SA/Kimberly-Clark (OJ 2002 L 12, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Decision 2002/14/EC of 12 July 2000 on the State aid granted by France to Scott Paper SA/Kimberly-Clark in so far as it concerns the aid granted in the form of a preferential price for the property referred to in Article 1; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Decision 2002/14/EC of 12 July 2000 on the State aid granted by France to Scott Paper SA/Kimberly-Clark in so far as it concerns the aid granted in the form of a preferential price for the property referred to in Article 1;

| 2. | Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant and by Scott SA. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant and by Scott SA.

---

(1)  OJ C 61, 24.2.2001.

1

---
#### § 381.213 Notification of governmental authorities having jurisdiction over article detained; form of written notification.

Within 48 hours after the detention of any poultry or other article pursuant to § 381.211, an authorized representative of the Secretary shall give oral or written notification of such detention to any Federal authorities not connected with the Inspection Service, and any State or other governmental authorities, having jurisdiction over such article. In the event notification is given orally, it shall be confirmed in writing, as promptly as circumstances permit.
# C_2011340EN.01001802.xml

| 19.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 340/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/18

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 July 2011 — Cree v OHIM (TRUEWHITE)

(Case T-208/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark TRUEWHITE - Absolute grounds for refusal - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 - Descriptive mark)

2011/C 340/36

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Cree, Inc. (Durham, North Carolina, United States) (represented by: V. Schiller, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented initially by: S. Schäffner, and subsequently by: G. Schneider, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 27 January 2010 (Case R 985/2009-2) concerning registration of the sign TRUEWHITE as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Cree, Inc. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Cree, Inc. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 179, 3.7.2010.

1

---
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA to Seek Applications to Expand the Production of Advanced Biofuels in 

Rural America 

WASHINGTON, Sept. 15, 2021 – United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Deputy Under Secretary 

for Rural Development Justin Maxson today announced that USDA will begin accepting applications on Friday, 

Oct. 1, 2021, to expand the production of advanced biofuels.

USDA will make $7 million available under the Advanced Biofuel Payment Program. Through this program,

producers will receive payments to help offset costs associated with the production of advanced biofuels. 

Examples of advanced biofuels include biodiesel, ethanol (other than corn kernel), electricity and biogas 

produced from anaerobic digesters, and solid fuels. 

The enrollment period for producers to sign up to participate for Fiscal Year 2022 is Oct. 1 to Oct. 31, 2021. 

Producers who participated in the program in Fiscal Year 2021 and new producers must enroll to receive 

payments.

For more information on enrollment, visit https://www.rd.usda.gov/programs-services/advanced-biofuelpayment-program or contact the State Rural Development Energy Coordinator in the state where the applicant 

is headquartered.

If you’d like to subscribe to USDA Rural Development updates, visit our GovDelivery subscriber page.

#

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender.
#### § 439.60 Notifications and hearings.

Accreditation of any laboratory will be refused, suspended, or revoked under the conditions previously described in this part. The owner or operator of the laboratory will be sent written notice of the refusal, suspension, or revocation of accreditation by the Administrator. In such cases, the laboratory owner or operator will be provided an opportunity to present, within 30 days of the date of the notification, a statement challenging the merits or validity of such action and to request an oral hearing with respect to the denial, suspension, or revocation decision. An oral hearing will be granted if there is any dispute of material fact joined in such responsive statement. The proceeding will be conducted thereafter in accordance with the applicable rules of practice, which will be adopted for the proceeding. Any such refusal, suspension, or revocation will be effective upon the receipt by the laboratory of the notification and will continue in effect until final determination of the matter by the Administrator.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 47 (Thursday, March 10, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 13124]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5462]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Yavapai County Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Yavapai County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet 
in Prescott, Arizona. The committee is meeting as authorized under the 
Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act (Pub. L. 110-
343) and in compliance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act. The 
purpose of the meeting is to orientate new committee members to the 
Secural Rural Schools Act, roles of members, guidelines for Title II, 
and the Federal Advisory Committee Act.

DATES: The meeting will be held March 25, 2011; 10:30 a.m to 2:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Yavapai County Mackin 
Building, 840 Rodeo Drive, Prescott, AZ 86305.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Debbie Maneely, RAC Coordinator, 
Prescott National Forest, 344 S. Cortez, Prescott, AZ 86301; (928) 443-
8130 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#66020b070803030a1f26001548000302481315"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9df9f0fcf3f8f8f1e4ddfbeeb3fbf8f9b3e8ee">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. The 
following business will be conducted: (1) Welcome and introductions; 
(2) Project Presentations/Questions-Answers; (3) review and ranking of 
projects submitted for Round 1; (4) next meeting agenda, location, and 
date.

    Dated: March 4, 2011.
Nancy Walls,
Acting Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2011-5462 Filed 3-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2012366EN.01003103.xml

| 24.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 366/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 366/31

---

Judgment of the General Court of 5 October 2012 — Lancôme v OHIM — Focus Magazin Verlag (COLOUR FOCUS)

(Case T-204/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community word mark COLOR FOCUS - Earlier Community word mark FOCUS - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the marks - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Genuine use of the earlier mark - Abuse of right)

2012/C 366/60

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie (Paris, France) (represented by: A. von Mühlendahl and S. Abel, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented: initially by S. Schäffner, and subsequently by A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Focus Magazin Verlag GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by R. Schweizer and J. Berlinger, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 February 2010 (Case R 238/2009-2), concerning invalidity proceedings between Focus Magazin Verlag GmbH and Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 179, 3.7.2010.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. EF11-4-001]

Take notice that on March 3, 2011, the Western Area Power Administration, submitted its Open Access Transmission Tariff Compliance Filing, to be effective March 2, 2011.

Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.

                    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the “eFiling” link at                     *http://www.ferc.gov.*                     Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.                

                    This filing is accessible on-line at                     *http://www.ferc.gov,*                     using the “eLibrary” link and is available for review in the Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an “eSubscription” link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov,*                     or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.                

*Comment Date:*                     5 p.m. Eastern Time on March 24, 2011.                

Dated: March 3, 2011.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2011-5323 Filed 3-8-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
# C_2011194EN.01001402.xml

| 2.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 194/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 194/14

---

Judgment of the General Court of 19 May 2011 — Tempus Vade v OHIM — Palacios Serrano (AIR FORCE)

(Case T-81/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark AIR FORCE - Earlier Community and national word and figurative marks TIME FORCE - Relative grounds for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - No similarity of signs - Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2011/C 194/21

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Tempus Vade, SL (San Sebastián de los Reyes, Spain) (represented by: A. Gómez López, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the Court: Juan Palacios Serrano (Alcobendas, Spain) (represented by: E. Ochoa Santamaría, J. del Valle Sánchez and V. Ruiz de Velasco Martinez de Ercilla, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 7 January 2010 (Case R 1114/208-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Tempus Vade, SL and Mr. Juan Palacios Serrano.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Tempus Vade, SL is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Tempus Vade, SL is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 100, 17.4.2010.

1

---
§ 319.106 “Country Ham,” “Country Style Ham,” “Dry Cured Ham,” “Country Pork Shoulder,” “Country Style Pork Shoulder,” and “Dry Cured Pork Shoulder.” ( a ) “Country Ham,” “Country Style Ham,” or “Dry Cured Ham,” and “Country Pork Shoulder,” “Country Style Pork Shoulder,” or “Dry Cured Pork Shoulder.” are the uncooked, cured, dried, smoked or unsmoked meat food products made respectively from a single piece of meat conforming to the definition of “ham,” as specified in § 317.8(b)(13) of this subchapter, or from a single piece of meat from a pork shoulder. They are prepared in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section by the dry application of salt (NaCl), or by the dry application of salt (NaCl) and one or more of the optional ingredients as specified in paragraph (d) of this section. They may not be injected with curing solutions nor placed in curing solutions.
( b ) ( 1 ) The entire exterior of the ham or pork shoulder shall be coated by the dry application of salt or by the dry application of salt combined with other ingredients as permitted in paragraph (d) of this section.
( 2 ) Additional salt, or salt mixed with other permitted ingredients, may be reapplied to the product as necessary to insure complete penetration.
( 3 ) When sodium or potassium nitrate, or sodium or potassium nitrite, or a combination thereof, is used, the application of salt shall be in sufficient quantity to insure that the finished product has an internal salt content of at least 4 percent.
( 4 ) When no sodium nitrate, potassium nitrate, sodium nitrite, potassium nitrite or a combination thereof is used, the application of salt shall be in sufficient quantity to insure that the finished product has a brine concentration of not less than 10 percent or a water activity of not more than 0.92.
( 5 ) [Reserved]
( 6 ) [Reserved]
( 7 ) The weight of the finished hams and pork shoulders covered in this section shall be at least 18 percent less than the fresh uncured weight of the article.
( c ) The optional ingredients for products covered in this section are: ( 1 ) Nutritive sweeteners, spices, seasonings and flavorings.
( 2 ) Sodium or potassium nitrate and sodium or potassium nitrite if used as prescribed in this section and in accordance with a regulation permitting that use in this subchapter or 9 CFR Chapter III, Subchapter E, or in 21 CFR Chapter I, Subchapter A or Subchapter B.
[42 FR 3299, Jan. 18, 1977, as amended at 64 FR 72174, Dec. 23, 1999; 83 FR 25307, May 31, 2018]
#### Jerome Silverman, Administrator (Estate of Harold Nathan) *v.*Walter A. Camp et al. Jerome Silverman, Administrator (Estate of Harold Nathan) *v.*St. Joseph’s Hospital et al.

*Marshall 8. Feingold,*in support of the motion.

Submitted May 30

decided June 11, 1974

The plaintiff’s “Motion For Permission To Appeal Before This Conrt” in the appeals from the Superior Court in Fairfield County at Stamford is granted to the extent that Alfred S. Julien of the New York bar is permitted to participate in the writing of the briefs on the appeals in these eases provided that the briefs are signed and presented to this court by Connecticut counsel who assume full responsibility for their contents. The remainder of the motion is denied.
EXHIBIT 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|Citizens and Farmers Bank, incorporated in Virginia     
|                                                        
|C&F Mortgage Corporation, incorporated in Virginia      
|                                                        
|Hometown Settlement Services LLC, organized in Virginia 
|                                                        
|Certified Appraisals LLC, organized in Virginia         
|                                                        
|C&F Reinsurance LTD, organized in Turks & Caicos Islands
|                                                        
|C&F Title Agency, Inc., incorporated in Virginia        
|                                                        
|C&F Finance Company, incorporated in Virginia           
|                                                        
|C&F Investment Services, Inc., incorporated in Virginia 
|                                                        
|C&F Insurance Services, Inc., incorporated in Virginia  
|                                                        
|C&F Financial Statutory Trust I, organized in Delaware
ye s
“ N “ / 9. 9
_ ire) , 4s >
Q es BPRS, | es . aa
SOY PI OMIT TI a) \.4 ft ae eae : oe S.
ff OF. 2 4 ’ y he» le i
5 aK “nf ; Ie Js | oe ; ik LS ‘ \ ) |
8 r folebes as oe wT | V\
\ y &
> uy

|: 100,000

a
_|
|
AGASSIZ VALLEYS

SCALE
L-189

ca e ee Tos ; 4 8)
a 8 H
a f oo By eax
oo g .
; 8 aid 5 s 7
x a! HINT {2s g
WA q \, ° Lu
A , i = . & ir
ie) o Wu.
| 2 “ = .
ye , a
HH . =
of k oO .
+ Q Ve Lu
: ¥ a 7
oo , Lae cc r
a : “
ee 0 » O
i of ~
/ 0, Ad © 44 \ 7 ,
_ ) 0 OLDEE
a Ee ( Do {
\ -0
oo); \ ‘ \ . \ , . ‘
ORES, %, {Ka \ ; . \ . \ ¥ Yo 4 | | | au ©) Ae SOLER
; a / C : \ an | } mn
aa ve
aa 0 4 , : y) o
a OF 4 y pe Okrae
~ ° 4 ; ~ \\ oO
mR) * ov
“a * 8 “ny
Yo or a NY : ’ oe \O ; | ‘ 4. ae OORT Oo
; aa . : ; —. Y .
gf} Se ; salle
(ora t. -_ “ / . ; ; . yA \\>
; 4 ; ‘ ; tel,
° at
‘of p y;——|
7 . 0 . 9 ‘
) RE 4 .
cs q ; A oe
) OSB Ee © P Sone | ‘ 2
. : “a ° t 3 OC EE . ~
. ne “, oO @) _ 7
O28EF % 4 a ° &S A eo
eae an 4 L
, . O
° 8 Os |_| | &y
a OZ Fap9 Ary] 11 \1\) N “o
se s .
e 78 i ©.
-_ rrr Hy ] . @ oe -
: y . ky 7 cy ii .
£0) E> : malt Kk
7 od } GC ] Beinn o Omge:
)RO 6 () N/E RL _—
a O88 EF = es ani tll UL ee -
f Ry aw ¥ @ p HLL | | z
&. . tt | Ww
\ “hie QS F japan a
Ce Va g tH I ae st y, ’
- + JT ralinatt
Oo 4 ai feeee

a

bee : ‘ | ; | . ] ORES

; G2"40'

MET UL HATTMI Ly) SSS se

a \
ae { A
7“ VO ‘ > (
, . -
oo mom
i ;
‘ a — SH] } ff i {| SSE
7 Z pf : , > AG
; _ L ; :
vs Xx : : | ~ St
o a :
~ : io)
OLE - *

PG .
Me . Q y, :
x . . <>
e Re | e
. c ad)
SS LA °

OS bes £

Zs f :

hy
\ fi
9 ya
“ r
“ ) fe) PX 2
“pB Paz '
OLbeyE
3 roy
* 8
> POF. \ /
i) < 7 >
O > .
, bs :
. AP
e 2 yy 22

Poe Tih aE Sa | : N= =) :
tg a]4 HAM HHT Cm 2a ZL Res

. S
4 \

4 — — ee ea ee ee eee i - + NIT SJL NO ANd 40 3903 WOLLISOd © — SS oe eee es ee 0d ——
uy YV¥SZ0 H3BWNN ee 7 HVSZO H3BWNN AS 304034 Hi
3 10H NVId VINHOSNVS “SNIAK! «© = NOWWHOdHOS CIGH Nid VINHOANVO “SNIAM! «* ~~ NOLWHOdHOO TIOH NVId VINHOSNVS MAKI « idHOS CIOH NWId VINHOSNVS ‘SI
oT v —Y i | i i

| | | | | 7 "ahoppeq Zs covby |

| . if i

| | | | QaGge eal: | | bated / |

| | | | | a | - |

yd | HagIAINN ONIAAVEO | j HaSIAINN SONIMVEO | HESIWNN SNIMVeC | | HSaIAI
#### § 557.11 Receipts to importers for import fish product samples.

FSIS will issue to importers official receipts for samples of foreign products collected for laboratory analysis, as provided in § 327.11 of this chapter.