alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2109. Selection boards; oath of members

Each member of a selection board shall swear—

(1) that the member will, without prejudice or partiality, and having in view both the special fitness of officers and the efficiency of the Coast Guard, perform the duties imposed upon the member; and

(2) an oath in accordance with section 931.

(Added Pub. L. 88–130, §1(10)(C), Sept. 24, 1963, 77 Stat. 179, §254; amended Pub. L. 112–213, title II, §207, Dec. 20, 2012, 126 Stat. 1546; renumbered §2109 and amended Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §§112(b), 123(b)(2), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4216, 4240.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282, §112(b), renumbered section 254 of this title as this section.

Par. (2). Pub. L. 115–282, §123(b)(2), substituted "section 931" for "section 635".

2012—Pub. L. 112–213 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "Each member of a selection board shall swear that he will, without prejudice or partiality, and having in view both the special fitness of officers and the efficiency of the Coast Guard, perform the duties imposed upon him."
§ 7.7 Prohibition against making complaints and investigations public. ( a ) Commission employees are subject to criminal penalties if they discuss or otherwise make public any matters pertaining to a complaint or investigation under 52 U.S.C. 30109, without the written permission of the person complained against or being investigated. Such communications are prohibited by 52 U.S.C. 30109(a)(12)(A).
( b ) Section 30109(a)(12)(B) of Title 52 of the United States Code provides as follows: “Any member or employee of the Commission, or any other person, who violates the provisions of [52 U.S.C. 30109(a)(12)(A)] shall be fined not more than $2,000. Any such member, employee, or other person who knowingly and willfully violates the provisions of [52 U.S.C. 30109(a)(12)(A)] shall be fined not more than $5,000.”
[79 FR 77844, Dec. 29, 2014]
240000m.6,

BATHYMETRIC MAP

ATLANTIC OCEAN

WILMINGTON. VALLEY

490000m.£,

9927 T9931
i
i

|
1000

19097

i
190s 1004
36 |

25

26

2090000m,,

4090000n.N,

YOo_AUBHSIS

3990000m.),

JNOz NOVA

3990000m N,

“969 970) "971 | pr2 |
74000006, T

Bathymetry compiled by the National Ocean Service (NOS) from Bathymetric Data other than
NOS hydrographic surveys. This is a facsimile reproduction of the bathymetric manuscript and
does not necessarily represent its final published form. This information is not intended for
navigational purposes.

Bathymetric Contour Interval: 50 meters to maximum depth.

Universal Transverse Mercator Grid. Zone 19; 10,000 meter ticks (---) are shown inside the
neatline. :

Protraction Diagram data shown in subdued (screened) black was compiled by the Minerals
Management Service (MMS).

THIS MAP IS NOT A LEGAL DOCUMENT for Federal leasing purposes; for such purposes
use the MMS Outer Continental Shelf Official Protraction Diagrams.

Heavy line(s) indicate lintits of these protraction diagrams.

EVALUATION OF BATHYMETRIC DATA

Bathymetry compiled by the National Ocean Service from

Random Tracklines and Bathymetric Surveys dated 1959 to 1974,
The Bathymetric Data ranges in scale from 1:500:000 to
1:1,000,000 with @ minimum line spacing of 3.0 and a maximum
line spacing of 18.0 nautical miles.

Data corrected for sound velocity according to Matthews’ Tables, 1939.

OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF RESOURCE MANAGEMENT MAP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL OCEAN SERVICE
1983
Produced at Washington, D.C.
for
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
MINERALS MANAGEMENT SERVICE

TRANSVERSE MERCATOR PROJECTION
Scale 1:250,000
5 u

5 ° 0 15 20 Statute Miles
——
5 10 15 20 25 30 Kilometers
————
0 5 10 15 Nautical Miles
1

jee
37°

BATHYMETRIC DATA INDEX

70°

Bathymetric data from sources other than
NOS hydrographic surveys.

37°

72°

36°
70°

490000m.£,

WILMINGTON VALLEY
NOS NJ 19-10 (OCS)

742 INDEX TO ADJOINING SHEETS ge
38° —_—— 38°

satrimore | on uchuet
x
ufise Ny S198
WILMINGTON Y
HYMAN, VALLEY ¥
NO Tet2 NJ 19-10 = >
Nas
ws
iro
WRAIGHT LupPoLD
Nie NIng-t
35° 38°
74° 8°

HO ANtd

27

e99°ASe
[The header and web page search is in an undisplayed frame - follow this link to view it][The header and web page search is in an undisplayed frame - follow this link to view it]
                Solar-Geophysical Data Reports
                    **54 Years of Space Weather Data**
                    
                    **Solar-Geophysical Data** was a monthly bulletin issued from 1955 to 2009 in one or two parts that
                        
                        provides the scientific community with a variety of solar-terrestrial data. Solar-Geophysical Data was
                        
                        intended to keep researchers informed on a timely schedule
                        
                        of the major events on the sun and of their associated interplanetary, ionospheric,
                        
                        geomagnetic and cosmic ray effects.  The report was made available through
                        
                        the cooperation of many observatories, laboratories and agencies whose data are
                        
                        summarized.  Part I (Prompt Reports) contains data for 1 or 2 months before the
                        
                        month of publication, and some late data; Part II (Comprehensive Reports)
                        
                        contains data for 6 months prior to publication plus late and miscellaneous
                        
                        data.The NOAA National Geophysical Data Center discontinued the publication of Solar-Geophysical Data reports in October of 2009.
                    **Complete PDF issues** can be downloaded at SGD_PDFversion. Older reports will be added when available.
# C_2007069EN.01000901.xml

| 24.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/9

---

Action brought on 1 February 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic

(Case C-41/07)

(2007/C 69/19)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: A. Caeiros and B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Portuguese Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | principally, a declaration that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2005/28/EC (1) of 8 April 2005 laying down principles and detailed guidelines for good clinical practice as regards investigational medicinal products for human use, as well as the requirements for authorisation of the manufacturing or importation of such products, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 31 of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

principally, a declaration that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Commission Directive 2005/28/EC (1) of 8 April 2005 laying down principles and detailed guidelines for good clinical practice as regards investigational medicinal products for human use, as well as the requirements for authorisation of the manufacturing or importation of such products, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 31 of that directive;

1

| — | or, a declaration that, by failing in any event to communicate those provisions to the Commission of the European Communities, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive; |
| --- | --- |

—

or, a declaration that, by failing in any event to communicate those provisions to the Commission of the European Communities, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;

| — | an order that the Portuguese Republic should pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

an order that the Portuguese Republic should pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for transposition into domestic law of that directive expired on 29 January 2006.

---

(1)  OJ L 91, 2005, p. 13.

1

---
#### Minnie Comerford v. George W. Bristol. Samuel Cohn v. George Tomes. Herbert E. Norwood v. Preferred Accident Insurance Company. Eldaen Realty Company v. Max E. G. Bensamon. Leon Gorditzer v. Morris Levenson. Ellen R. Dorsett v. Doubleday & Company. Adolph Barth v. James Blaine. Anna Rosenberg v. George Jacobson. C. Albert Jacob v. Antoinette Kellogg. Innovation Trunk Company v. Arthur C. Platt. Julius Stern v. Barrett Chemical Company.

Applications for leave to appeal to Appellate División denied, with ten dollars costs in each casé. Orders signed.
Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Jupiter Marine
International Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal
period ending April 27, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lawrence Tierney, Principal
Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


By: /s/ Lawrence Tierney
    --------------------
    Lawrence Tierney
    Principal Accounting Officer
    April 9, 2003
Rural Development

Joaquin Altoro 

Administrator

Rural Housing Service

1400 Independence Ave, SW 

Room 5014-S

Washington, D.C. 20250

Telephone: (202) 692-0268

TO: State Directors/Acting State Directors

ATTN: Area Directors 

Area Specialists

Rural Housing Program Directors 

FROM: Joaquin Altoro 

Administrator

Rural Housing Service

SUBJECT: Interest Rate Changes for Housing Programs 

and Credit Sales (Nonprogram)

The following interest rates, effective April 1, 2024, are reported as follows:

Loan Type

ALL LOAN TYPES

Existing Rate New Rate

Treasury Judgment Rate 4.680% 4.940%

The rate shown above is as of March 1, 2024. The actual judgment rate that will 

be used will be the rate for the calendar week preceding the date the defendant 

becomes liable for interest. This rate may be found by going to the Federal 

Reserve website for the weekly average 1-year Constant Maturity Treasury Yield.

RURAL HOUSING LOANS

Rural Housing (RH) 502

Very-Low or Low 4.500% 4.500%

Single Family Housing

(SFH) Nonprogram 5.000% 5.000%

Rural Housing Site

(RH-524), Non-Self-Help 4.500% 4.500%

Rural Rental Housing and

Rural Cooperative Housing 4.500% 4.500%

Please notify appropriate personnel of these rates.

Sent by Electronic Mail on, _______ at _______ by Policy and Analysis Staff.

State Directors should advise other personnel as appropriate.

EXPIRATION DATE: FILING INSTRUCTIONS:

April 30, 2024 Administrative/Other Programs

USDA is an equal opportunity lender, provider and employer.
### SUBCHAPTER II—CAPITAL, STOCK, AND STOCKHOLDERS
### §1842. Authority for loan guarantees; terms and conditions

The Board, on such terms and conditions as it deems appropriate, may guarantee, or make commitments to guarantee, lenders against loss of principal or interest on loans that meet the requirements of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 92–70, §3, Aug. 9, 1971, 85 Stat. 178.)
59–008 

110TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 110–156 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY THE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION (S. CON. RES. 21) SETTING 

FORTH THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET FOR THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2008 AND INCLUDING THE APPROPRIATE 

BUDGETARY LEVELS FOR FISCAL YEARS 2007 AND 2009 THROUGH 2012 

MAY 16, 2007.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Ms. SUTTON, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 409] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 409, by nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives all points of order against the conference 

report to accompany S. Con. Res. 21, setting forth the congressional 

budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2008 and 

including the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2007 and 

2009 through 2012, and against its consideration. The rule provides 

that the conference report shall be considered as read. The rule 

provides for one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by 

the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 

the Budget. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

The waiver of all points of order against the conference report 

and against its consideration includes a waiver of clause 8 of rule 

XXII (requiring a three-day layover of conference reports and the 

accompanying joint explanatory statement). Although the rule 

waives all points of order against the conference report and against 

its consideration, the conference report does not violate either 

clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with HEARING
EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
  Asante Technologies, Inc.

We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statements  on Form S-8 (No.  333-73454 and  333-56432) of Asante  Technologies,
Inc. of our report  dated  November 2, 2001,  except for note 9, as to which the
date is December 1, 2001,  relating to the  financial  statements  and financial
statement schedules, which appear in this Form 10K.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Jose, California
December 21, 2001
Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report  of Sunburst Acquisitions VI, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form  10-QSB for the period ending October 31,  2002  (the
"Report"), I,  Michael R. Quinn, Principal Executive Officer  and  Principal
Financial  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to  18  U.S.C.  Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of  2002,
that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the  Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.



/s/ Michael R. Quinn

-----------------------
Principal Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer
Date:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001063450
<NAME>                        Galaxy Enterprises, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                  1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1.000
<CASH>                                             337,226
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      297,039
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                         44,133
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,086,575
<PP&E>                                             332,663
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (102,949)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,521,121
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,138,205
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            39,978
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,547,052
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,521,121
<SALES>                                          8,167,288
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,167,288
<CGS>                                            4,643,970
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,826,302
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   4,567
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (664,645)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (277,997)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (659,014)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                           44,982
<NET-INCOME>                                      (431,630)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (0.076)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.076)




</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 

Mansfield Heliflight, Inc. 

Complainant 

v. 

City of Burlington, Vermont 

Respondent 

FAA Docket No. 16-14-06 

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME 

This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the abovereferenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted 

Airport Enforcement Proceedings, 14 CFR, Part 16, subpart B. The Complainant unopposed 

motion for an extension oftime, filed on October 3, 2014, is hereby GRANTED and the reply 

and answer are due on or before November 24,2014. 

An extension of time is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination in this 

case. 

I{ dovP\~~ t# If 

Date 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on November 19, 2014, I caused to be placed in the United 

States mail (first class mail, postage paid) a true copy of the FAA's Request for 

Additional Information and Notice of Extension of Time, addressed to: 

FOR RESPONDENT 

Pablo 0. Nuesch 

Anjali G. Patel 

Spiegel and McDiarmid, LLP 

1875 Eye Street, N.W. 

Suite 700 

Washington, DC 20006 

FOR COMPLAINANT 

Benjamin H. Klein 

The Klein Law Firm, LLC 

61 Broadway, Suite 2125 

New York, NY 10006 

Copy to: 

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket 

FAA Airport Compliance and Management Analysis, AC0-1 00 

. ] (!;;l1Ak~:'lift0~~) Claudia Roberts 

Office of Airport Compliance
### §702. State Department

The Coast Guard, through the Secretary, may exchange information, through the Secretary of State, with foreign governments and suggest to the Secretary of State international collaboration and conferences on all matters dealing with the safety of life and property at sea, other than radio communication.

(Aug. 4, 1949, ch. 393, 63 Stat. 505, §142; renumbered §702, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §106(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4203.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Because of the numerous situations in which it is necessary for the Coast Guard to deal with foreign governments, particularly in the field of safety of life and property at sea, the Coast Guard and the State Department agree that a provision such as this is desirable.

The international character of many Coast Guard functions makes it more and more necessary for the Service to be an initiating or participating agency in international collaboration. Examples of international meetings concerned with matters affecting the Coast Guard include those which dealt with the International Rules of the Road, international load lines, the International Code of Signals, safety at sea, and international telecommunications. It is highly desirable that there be a clear-cut legislative expression of Coast Guard cooperation with the State Department on proposed international conferences dealing with various phases of Coast Guard activities, such as aids to navigation, life-saving equipment, navigation and communication equipment other than radio communication, regulation of dangerous cargoes, international rules of the road, safety requirements and equipment of transoceanic aircraft and vessels, and safe manning standards and efficiency of personnel employed on transoceanic aircraft and vessels. Provisions for similar relationship between the Civil Aeronautical Board and the State Department appear in the act of June 23, 1938, as amended, 52 Stat. 984 (title 49, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §§425(c), 602). 81st Congress, House Report No. 557.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 702 was renumbered section 3702 of this title.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 142 of this title as this section.
#### H. R. Connrealco et al. *v.*Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Oxford

*Robert J. Uskevich,*in support of the petition.

*Frederick F. Ehrsam,*in opposition.

Submitted June 17

decided July 2, 1974

The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in New Haven County is denied.
**EXHIBIT 15.5**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-229957 and No. 333-198578) and Form F-3 (No. 333-210795) of JD.com, Inc. of our report dated April 26, 2019 relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Bitauto Holdings Limited, which appears in this Form 20-F/A (Amendment No. 1).

 
| /s/   PricewaterhouseCoopers Zhong Tian LLP    |   |
|------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Beijing, the People’s   Republic of China |   |
| June 28, 2019                             |   |

 

----