This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains regulatory documents having general

applicability and legal effect, most of which

are keyed to and codified in the Code of

Federal Regulations, which is published under

50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by

the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of

new books are listed in the first FEDERAL

REGISTER issue of each week.

Rules and Regulations Federal Register

10541 

Vol. 82, No. 29 

Tuesday, February 14, 2017 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2014–0571; Directorate 

Identifier 2014–NM–059–AD; Amendment 

39–18782; AD 2017–02–03] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing 

Company Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for certain 

The Boeing Company Model 767–200, 

–300, and –400ER series airplanes. This 

AD was prompted by a report of a 

malfunction of the engine indication 

and crew alerting system (EICAS) 

during flight. This AD requires, for 

certain airplanes, a general visual 

inspection of the spray shield, and 

related investigative and corrective 

actions if necessary. We are issuing this 

AD to address the unsafe condition on 

these products. 

DATES: This AD is effective March 16, 

2017. 

The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference 

of a certain publication listed in this AD 

as of March 16, 2017. 

ADDRESSES: For service information 

identified in this final rule, contact 

Boeing Commercial Airplanes, 

Attention: Data & Services Management, 

P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65, Seattle, WA 

98124–2207; telephone 206–544–5000, 

extension 1; fax 206–766–5680; Internet 

https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You 

may view this referenced service 

information at the FAA, Transport 

Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue 

SW., Renton, WA. For information on 

the availability of this material at the 

FAA, call 425–227–1221. It is also 

available on the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov by searching for 

and locating Docket No. FAA–2014– 

0571. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov by searching for 

and locating Docket No. FAA–2014– 

0571; or in person at the Docket 

Management Facility between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. The AD docket 

contains this AD, the regulatory 

evaluation, any comments received, and 

other information. The address for the 

Docket Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is 

Docket Management Facility, U.S. 

Department of Transportation, Docket 

Operations, M–30, West Building 

Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, 

DC 20590. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Stanley Chen, Aerospace Engineer, 

Cabin Safety and Environmental 

Systems Branch, ANM–150S, FAA, 

Seattle Aircraft Certification Office 

(ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, 

WA 98057–3356; phone: 425–917–6585; 

fax: 425–917–6590; email: 

stanley.chen@faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Discussion 

We issued a supplemental notice of 

proposed rulemaking (SNPRM) to 

amend 14 CFR part 39 by adding an AD 

that would apply to certain The Boeing 

Company Model 767–200, –300, and 

–400ER series airplanes. The SNPRM 

published in the Federal Register on 

April 13, 2016 (81 FR 21762) (‘‘the 

SNPRM’’). We preceded the SNPRM 

with a notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM) that published in the Federal 

Register on August 14, 2014 (79 FR 

47597) (‘‘the NPRM’’). The NPRM 

proposed to require an inspection for 

plastic couplings, corrective actions if 

necessary, and installation of new spray 

shrouds. The NPRM was prompted by a 

report of a malfunction of the engine 

indication and crew alerting system 

(EICAS) during flight. The SNPRM 

proposed, for certain airplanes, a 

general visual inspection of the spray 

shield and related investigative and 

corrective actions if necessary. We are 

issuing this AD to prevent an 

uncontrolled water leak from a defective 

potable water system coupling, which 

could cause the main equipment center 

(MEC) line replaceable units (LRUs) to 

become wet, resulting in an electrical 

short and potential loss of several 

functions essential for safe flight. 

Comments 

We gave the public the opportunity to 

participate in developing this AD. The 

following presents the comments 

received on the SNPRM and the FAA’s 

response to each comment. 

Request To Include Latest Service 

Information 

Boeing requested that we revise the 

SNPRM to include the latest service 

information—Boeing Alert Service 

Bulletin 767–38A0073, Revision 3, 

dated September 8, 2016, which added 

10 airplanes to the effectivity. The 

revised service information also added 

Part 5 of the Work Instructions to 

enhance the hose installation between 

location 6 and location 9 for an airplane 

on which a post-production 

configuration change had been made. 

Boeing noted that future revisions could 

be published as conditions dictate. 

We partially agree with the request. 

To require Revision 3 in this AD 

would necessitate issuing another 

supplemental NPRM to solicit 

comments on the merits of this change. 

We have determined that an unsafe 

condition exists, and delaying this 

action further would be inappropriate. 

However, we have added new content 

to paragraph (i) of this AD to specify an 

additional method of compliance that 

was not part of the SNPRM. This 

additional method of compliance allows 

the use of Revision 3 for the coupling 

inspection and spray shroud installation 

specified in paragraph (g) of this AD. 

This AD retains the applicability 

specified in paragraph (c) of the 

proposed AD (in the SNPRM). That is, 

this AD affects Model 767–200, –300, 

and –400ER series airplanes that are 

identified in Boeing Alert Service 

Bulletin 767–38A0073, Revision 2, 

dated August 10, 2015. 

Likewise, this AD retains the specific 

compliance method specified in 

paragraphs (g) and (h) of the proposed 

AD (in the SNPRM). That is, the actions 

must be done in accordance with Boeing 

Alert Service Bulletin 767–38A0073, 

Revision 2, dated August 10, 2015. (See 

‘‘Request to Revise Description of 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
10542 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 29 / Tuesday, February 14, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 

Affected Airplanes’’ for an explanation 

of the revision of paragraphs (g) and (h) 

of the proposed AD (in the SNPRM).) 

For the 10 airplanes added in Boeing 

Alert Service Bulletin 767–38A0073, 

Revision 3, dated September 8, 2016, we 

might consider additional rulemaking to 

mandate the actions specified in this 

AD. 

Request To Revise Description of 

Affected Airplanes 

Boeing requested that we revise 

paragraphs (g) and (h) of the proposed 

AD (in the SNPRM) to remove the 

references to airplane groups. Boeing 

explained that this change would 

simplify the wording of the AD and 

avoid a potential mismatch between the 

AD and the service information if 

grouping is adjusted in the future. 

Boeing stated that the release of Boeing 

Alert Service Bulletin 767–38A0073, 

Revision 3, dated September 8, 2016, 

makes paragraph (g) of the proposed AD 

(in the SNPRM) incorrect because it 

does not account for newly added 

groups 14 and 15. Boeing also noted that 

future revisions could be published as 

conditions indicate. 

We partially agree with the request. 

Paragraphs (g) and (h) of the proposed 

AD (in the SNPRM) have been revised 

to restructure the content into paragraph 

(g) in this AD and remove the references 

to specific airplane groups. As stated 

previously, we might consider future 

rulemaking to mandate the actions in 

this AD for the airplanes identified as 

Groups 14 and 15 in Boeing Alert 

Service Bulletin 767–38A0073, Revision 

3, dated September 8, 2016. 

Request for Clarification of 

Requirements 

Boeing requested that we revise 

paragraph (h) of the proposed AD (in the 

SNPRM) (now paragraph (g)(2) in this 

AD) to change the phrase ‘‘applicable 

related investigative and corrective 

actions’’ to ‘‘applicable corrective 

actions.’’ Boeing indicated that this 

change would clarify the intent of the 

proposed AD because, as written, the 

proposed AD could be misinterpreted as 

requiring both the inspection for 

discrepant shields and the resulting 

corrective action before further flight. 

We disagree to remove the phrase 

‘‘related investigative [actions],’’ as 

requested. As explained in the SNPRM, 

related investigative actions are followon actions that (1) are related to the 

primary action, and (2) further 

investigate the nature of any condition 

found; related investigative actions in 

an AD could include, for example, 

inspections. Specifically, in this AD, the 

phrase ‘‘related investigative actions’’ 

includes testing and repairing potable 

water system leaks. We have not 

changed this final rule regarding this 

issue. 

Request To Clarify Incorporation by 

Reference 

Paragraph (k) of the proposed AD (in 

the SNPRM) stated that Boeing Alert 

Service Bulletin 767–38A0073, dated 

November 12, 2013; and Boeing Service 

Bulletin 767–38A0073, Revision 1, 

dated November 5, 2014; are not 

‘‘incorporated by reference in this AD.’’ 

Boeing requested that we delete that 

statement because its intent is unclear 

and could be misinterpreted. 

We agree that clarification is 

necessary. Paragraph (k) in the proposed 

AD (in the SNPRM) provides credit for 

compliance with the AD for work 

completed using earlier revisions of the 

service information that are not 

specifically mandated by the AD, while 

the latest revision of the service 

information would be mandated. 

Although Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 

767–38A0073, dated November 12, 

2013, and Boeing Service Bulletin 767– 

38A0073, Revision 1, dated November 

5, 2014, will not be incorporated by 

reference in this AD, we agree to remove 

that statement from paragraph (k) of the 

AD. 

Request To Revise Phrasing in ‘‘Credit 

for Previous Actions’’ Paragraph 

Boeing requested that we revise 

paragraph (k) of the proposed AD (in the 

SNPRM) to account for additional 

revisions that may be necessary to 

identify in the AD, depending on the 

effective date of the AD. Boeing stated 

that the proposed AD (in the SNPRM) 

would exclude some groups from being 

given credit for accomplishment of the 

referenced service information. Boeing 

stated that if airlines have completed all 

actions in accordance with Boeing Alert 

Service Bulletin 767–38A0073, Revision 

2, dated August 10, 2015, or Boeing 

Alert Service Bulletin 767–38A0073, 

Revision 3, dated September 8, 2016, no 

groups should be excluded. 

We do not agree that it is necessary 

to revise the service information 

identified in paragraph (k) of this AD. 

As stated previously, Boeing Alert 

Service Bulletin 767–38A0073, Revision 

3, dated September 8, 2016, is included 

in paragraph (i) of this AD to provide an 

additional method of compliance for the 

requirements of paragraph (g) of this 

AD. Additional credit for 

accomplishment of Revision 3 is 

therefore unnecessary. This AD will 

provide credit for only the 

accomplishment of Boeing Alert Service 

Bulletin 767–38A0073, dated November 

12, 2013; and Boeing Service Bulletin 

767–38A0073, Revision 1, dated 

November 5, 2014. 

Effect of Winglets on Accomplishment 

of the Proposed Actions 

Aviation Partners Boeing stated that 

the installation of winglets per 

supplemental type certificate (STC) 

ST01920SE does not affect the 

accomplishment of the manufacturer’s 

service instructions. 

We agree with the commenter that 

STC ST01920SE does not affect the 

accomplishment of the manufacturer’s 

service instructions. Therefore, the 

installation of STC ST01920SE does not 

affect the ability to accomplish the 

actions required by this AD. We have 

not changed this AD in this regard. 

Conclusion 

We reviewed the relevant data, 

considered the comments received, and 

determined that air safety and the 

public interest require adopting this AD 

with the changes described previously 

and minor editorial changes. We have 

determined that these minor changes: 

• Are consistent with the intent that 

was proposed in the SNPRM for 

correcting the unsafe condition; and 

• Do not add any additional burden 

upon the public than was already 

proposed in the SNPRM. 

We also determined that these 

changes will not increase the economic 

burden on any operator or increase the 

scope of this AD. 

Related Service Information Under 1 

CFR Part 51 

We reviewed Boeing Alert Service 

Bulletin 767–38A0073, Revision 2, 

dated August 10, 2015; and Boeing Alert 

Service Bulletin 767–38A0073, Revision 

3, dated September 8, 2016. The service 

information describes procedures for a 

general visual inspection for plastic 

potable water couplings, and applicable 

related investigative and corrective 

actions; installation of new spray 

shrouds; and a general visual inspection 

of the spray shield to determine if it has 

two slits and is installed correctly, and 

applicable related investigative and 

corrective actions. These documents are 

distinct since they are revisions of the 

same service information and have 

different airplane groupings for different 

configurations. This service information 

is reasonably available because the 

interested parties have access to it 

through their normal course of business 

or by the means identified in the 

ADDRESSES section. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 29 / Tuesday, February 14, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 10543 

Costs of Compliance 

We estimate that this AD affects 136 

airplanes of U.S. registry. We estimate 

the following costs to comply with this 

AD: 

ESTIMATED COSTS

Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per 

product 

Cost on U.S. 

operators 

Part 1—inspection (Groups 1–3, 9, and 11, Configuration 1; Groups 4–8, 10, and 12–13) (136 airplanes).Up to 3 work-hours × $85 per hour 

= $255.

$0 Up to $255 ..... Up to $34,680. 

Part 2—inspection (Group 9, Configuration 1; and 

Group 10) (32 airplanes).

2 work-hours × $85 per hour = 

$170.

0 $170 ............... $5,440. 

Part 3—installation of spray shrouds (136 airplanes) ... 3 work-hours × $85 per hour = 

$255.

330 $585 ............... $79,560. 

Part 4—inspection (Groups 1–3, 9, and 11, Configuration 2) (30 airplanes).2 work-hours × $85 per hour = 

$170.

0 $170 ............... $5,100. 

We estimate the following costs to do 

any necessary on-condition actions that 

would be required based on the results 

of the inspection. We have no way of 

determining the number of aircraft that 

might need these actions: 

ON-CONDITION COSTS

Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per 

product 

Related investigative actions ........................................ 3 work-hours × $85 per hour = $255 ........................... $0 $255. 

Corrective actions ......................................................... Up to 1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85 .................... 53 Up to $138. 

According to the manufacturer, some 

of the costs of this AD may be covered 

under warranty, thereby reducing the 

cost impact on affected individuals. We 

do not control warranty coverage for 

affected individuals. As a result, we 

have included all costs in our cost 

estimate. 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: 

Aviation Programs, describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: 

‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

This AD will not have federalism 

implications under Executive Order 

13132. This AD will not have a 

substantial direct effect on the States, on 

the relationship between the national 

government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify that this AD: 

(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866, 

(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 

(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), 

(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation 

in Alaska, and 

(4) Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

Adoption of the Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as 

follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding 

the following new airworthiness 

directive (AD): 

2017–02–03 The Boeing Company: 

Amendment 39–18782; Docket No. 

FAA–2014–0571; Directorate Identifier 

2014–NM–059–AD. 

(a) Effective Date 

This AD is effective March 16, 2017. 

(b) Affected ADs 

None. 

(c) Applicability 

This AD applies to The Boeing Company 

Model 767–200, –300, and –400ER series 

airplanes, certificated in any category, as 

identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 

767–38A0073, Revision 2, dated August 10, 

2015. 

(d) Subject 

Air Transport Association (ATA) of 

America Code 38, Water/Waste. 

(e) Unsafe Condition 

This AD was prompted by a report of a 

malfunction of the engine indication and 

crew alerting system (EICAS) during flight. 

We are issuing this AD to prevent an 

uncontrolled water leak from a defective 

potable water system coupling, which could 

cause the main equipment center (MEC) line 

replaceable units (LRUs) to become wet, 

resulting in an electrical short and potential 

loss of several functions essential for safe 

flight. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
10544 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 29 / Tuesday, February 14, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 

(f) Compliance 

Comply with this AD within the 

compliance times specified, unless already 

done. 

(g) Inspection of Couplings and Installation 

of Spray Shrouds 

For Groups and Configurations as 

identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 

767–38A0073, Revision 2, dated August 10, 

2015, as applicable: At the applicable times 

identified in paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ 

of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767– 

38A0073, Revision 2, dated August 10, 2015, 

except as required by paragraph (h) of this 

AD, do the actions specified in paragraphs 

(g)(1) and (g)(2) of this AD, as applicable. 

(1) Do a general visual inspection for 

plastic potable water couplings; do all 

applicable related investigative and 

corrective actions; and install new spray 

shrouds, including a new hose assembly, as 

applicable; in accordance with the 

Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert 

Service Bulletin 767–38A0073, Revision 2, 

dated August 10, 2015. Do all applicable 

related investigative and corrective actions 

within the applicable compliance time 

identified in paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ 

of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767– 

38A0073, Revision 2, dated August 10, 2015, 

except as required by paragraph (h) of this 

AD. 

(2) Within 72 months after the effective 

date of this AD, do a general visual 

inspection of the spray shield to determine 

if it has two slits and is installed correctly, 

and before further flight, do all applicable 

related investigative and corrective actions, 

in accordance with the Accomplishment 

Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 

767–38A0073, Revision 2, dated August 10, 

2015. 

Note 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD: 

Operators can take optional protective 

measures to cover or shield their equipment 

against water spray when performing the 

Potable Water System Leakage Test, as 

specified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 

767–38A0073, Revision 2, dated August 10, 

2015. 

(h) Exception to the Service Information 

Where paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of 

Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767–38A0073, 

Revision 2, dated August 10, 2015, specifies 

a compliance time ‘‘after the original issue 

date of this service bulletin,’’ this AD 

requires compliance within the specified 

compliance time after the effective date of 

this AD. 

(i) Additional Method of Compliance 

Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767– 

38A0073, Revision 3, dated September 8, 

2016, is acceptable for compliance with the 

requirements of paragraph (g) of this AD, as 

applicable to the Groups and Configurations 

as identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 

767–38A0073, Revision 3, dated September 

8, 2016. 

(j) Parts Installation Prohibition 

As of the effective date of this AD, no 

person may install any plastic potable water 

coupling having part number (P/N) CA620 

series or P/N CA625 series on any airplane. 

(k) Credit for Previous Actions 

For airplanes in Groups 4 through 8, 10, 

12, and 13, as identified in Boeing Alert 

Service Bulletin 767–38A0073, Revision 2, 

dated August 10, 2015: This paragraph 

provides credit for the actions specified in 

paragraph (g) of this AD, if those actions were 

performed before the effective date of this AD 

using Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767– 

38A0073, dated November 12, 2013; or 

Boeing Service Bulletin 767–38A0073, 

Revision 1, dated November 5, 2014. 

(l) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft 

Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the 

authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if 

requested using the procedures found in 14 

CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, 

send your request to your principal inspector 

or local Flight Standards District Office, as 

appropriate. If sending information directly 

to the manager of the ACO, send it to the 

attention of the person identified in 

paragraph (m)(1) of this AD. Information may 

be emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOCRequests@faa.gov. 

(2) Before using any approved AMOC, 

notify your appropriate principal inspector, 

or lacking a principal inspector, the manager 

of the local flight standards district office/ 

certificate holding district office. 

(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable 

level of safety may be used for any repair, 

modification, or alteration required by this 

AD if it is approved by the Boeing 

Commercial Airplanes Organization 

Designation Authorization (ODA) that has 

been authorized by the Manager, Seattle 

ACO, to make those findings. To be 

approved, the repair method, modification 

deviation, or alteration deviation must meet 

the certification basis of the airplane, and the 

approval must specifically refer to this AD. 

(4) For service information that contains 

steps that are labeled as Required for 

Compliance (RC), the provisions of 

paragraphs (l)(4)(i) and (l)(4)(ii) of this AD 

apply. 

(i) The steps labeled as RC, including 

substeps under an RC step and any figures 

identified in an RC step, must be done to 

comply with the AD. If a step or substep is 

labeled ‘‘RC Exempt,’’ then the RC 

requirement is removed from that step or 

substep. An AMOC is required for any 

deviations to RC steps, including substeps 

and identified figures. 

(ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be 

deviated from using accepted methods in 

accordance with the operator’s maintenance 

or inspection program without obtaining 

approval of an AMOC, provided the RC steps, 

including substeps and identified figures, can 

still be done as specified, and the airplane 

can be put back in an airworthy condition. 

(m) Related Information 

(1) For more information about this AD, 

contact Stanley Chen, Aerospace Engineer, 

Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems 

Branch, ANM–150S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft 

Certification Office (ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue 

SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356; phone: 425– 

917–6585; fax: 425–917–6590; email: 

stanley.chen@faa.gov. 

(2) Service information identified in this 

AD that is not incorporated by reference is 

available at the addresses specified in 

paragraphs (n)(3) and (n)(4) of this AD. 

(n) Material Incorporated by Reference 

(1) The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference 

(IBR) of the service information listed in this 

paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR 

part 51. 

(2) You must use this service information 

as applicable to do the actions required by 

this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. 

(i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767– 

38A0073, Revision 2, dated August 10, 2015. 

(ii) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767– 

38A0073, Revision 3, dated September 8, 

2016. 

(3) For Boeing service information 

identified in this AD, contact Boeing 

Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & 

Services Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 

2H–65, Seattle, WA 98124–2207; telephone 

206–544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766– 

5680; Internet https://

www.myboeingfleet.com. 

(4) You may view this service information 

at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For 

information on the availability of this 

material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. 

(5) You may view this service information 

that is incorporated by reference at the 

National Archives and Records 

Administration (NARA). For information on 

the availability of this material at NARA, call 

202–741–6030, or go to http://

www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 

11, 2017. 

Michael Kaszycki, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2017–01338 Filed 2–13–17; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2016–6984; Airspace 

Docket No. 16–ANM–5] 

Amendment of Class E Airspace, 

Salem, OR 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This action modifies the Class 

E airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface at McNary Field, 

Salem, OR. After a review of the 

airspace, the FAA found additional 

airspace is required to support the 

current standard instrument approach 

and departure procedures for the safety 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES