alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<LEGEND>
MSDW Municipal Income Opportuninities Trust
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1999
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                      185,790,355
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                     172,286,793
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,738,604
<ASSETS-OTHER>                                 211,208
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             180,236,605
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                   (6,483,698)
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                              0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                    (278,663)
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                        (6,762,361)
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                                      0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                   199,718,242
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                       21,084,072
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                       21,089,872
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                    3,509,320
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                               0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                   (16,249,756)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                             0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                  (13,503,562)
<NET-ASSETS>                               173,474,244
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                                    0
<INTEREST-INCOME>                            6,923,026
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<EXPENSES-NET>                               (822,498)
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                      6,100,528
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                       214,080
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                  (9,561,007)
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                      (3,246,399)
<EQUALIZATION>                                       0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                  (6,431,999)
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                             0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                                0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                              0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>                    (5,800)
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                                  0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                     (9,726,129)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                      3,840,791
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                 (16,463,836)
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                           0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                        (445,251)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                              (826,779)
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                       177,127,288
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                             8.69
<PER-SHARE-NII>                                   0.29
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                         (0.44)
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                            (0.31)
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                         0.00
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                              0.00
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                               8.23
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                                   0.93


</TABLE>
[No. 8740.]

#### HARLEM V. BODAMER.

*Error to Denver District Court.*Hon. Charles C. Butler, Judge.

*Application for Supersedeas.*

Mr. Frank McLaughlin, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Emory S. Irwin, for defendant in error.

*Per Curiam:*

The application for supersedeas is denied, and the judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 13.1
 GRUPO TELEVISA, S.A.B.
 SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
  1.
    
    The Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, to
which this statement is filed as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By:
    /s/  Emilio Azcárraga JeanName:
    Emilio Azcárraga JeanTitle:
    Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
Order entered June 1 7 , 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 21

- 00784

- CR

RUBEN LABRADA , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 292nd Judicia l District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F 18

- 75816

- V

O RDER

Before the Court is appellant ’s June 14 , 2022 fourth motion for an extension

of time to file his brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant ’ s brief

received with the motion filed as of the date of this order.

/s / BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE
### RE: question on SeaTac project Nate Holloway t o : Jesse Pritts 07/23/2010 12:10 PM History: This message has been replied to.

Sorry Pond F is correct. I got confused since Pond F started out w/ 1 system then added another by Dec 2007. C,D,G1, G2 Ponds: G1/2 were storage ponds only and were pumped to ponds C and D. From there we pre-treated to a separate temporary lined pond. Any one of the 5 filters could pull from that pre-treatment pond. Also, either of the 2 control units could pull from C or D ponds. Hope this helps,

Nate 425-754-1541

-----Original Message----- From: Pritts.Jesse@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Pritts.Jesse@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 1:31 PM To: Nate Holloway Subject: RE: question on SeaTac project Awesome - thanks. There are five systems associated with ponds C, D, G1 and G2 - do you know which of the five systems were located at each of the four ponds? Also, you listed the Site 1 December 2007 file as being the M pond - is that correct, or is it the F pond? I ask because you indicated the M pond had one system while the F pond had two. Thanks - I know it's a pain to dig through old files.

From: "Nate Holloway" <nholloway@ch2ocsi.com>

To: Jesse Pritts/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 07/22/2010 03:40 PM

Subject: RE: question on SeaTac projectJesse, I've filled out the corresponding pond info in the attached spreadsheet and double checked that the files I sent you earlier match. Basically our treatment systems are modular with control units that can handle between 1-5 54" sandfilters (500gpm nominal flow rate each), but each sandfilter has it's own PLC and corresponding data set Pond F = 2-500gpm systems Pond M = 1-500gpm system CDG Ponds = 5-500gpm systems South Pond = 4-500gpm system

I apologize for the confusion, we have since moved to a more comprehensive web-based data management system in an effort to avoid issues such as this If you need more information please let me know.

Nate 425-754-1541

-----Original Message----- From: Pritts.Jesse@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Pritts.Jesse@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 8:53 AM To: Nate Holloway Subject: RE: question on SeaTac projectHi NateDid a bit more digging this morning - take a look at the attached spreadsheet. What I need to know is which systems correspond to which ponds. I have six data files, but there is no information in five of these files that identifies which systems are associated with which pond on the site. Only one file (the site 3, January 2008 file) identifies the system as being at pond M. If you need the actual data files, I can email those to you. Just let me know.Thanks againJesse W. Pritts, P.E. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW (4303T)Washington, DC 20460 tel 202-566-1038 fax 202-566-1053 www.epa.gov/waterscience Courier/FedEx: 1301 Constitution Ave., NW Room 6233AA EPA West Washington, DC 20004 (See attached file: Site 1 2 3 systems and ponds.xlsx) [attachment "Site 1 2 3 systems and ponds.xlsx" deleted by Jesse Pritts/DC/USEPA/US]
#### § 381.102 [Reserved]
#### THE PEOPLE OF THE TERRITORY OF GUAM v. FRANKIE Q. AGUON and FRANCISCO A. SABLAN, Defendants

Criminal No. 184F-75

Superior Court of Guam

March 2, 1976

ABBATE, *Judge*

DECISION

The Court is of the opinion that it is compelled to deny this motion to dismiss. The courts of lower rank cannot deviate from precedents established by courts which possess appellate jurisdiction over same, *Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court,*368 P.2d 97 (1962). In this instance, the issue raised by this motion to dismiss is identical to that issue raised when a writ of prohibition was sought from the District Court of Guam against the Superior Court of Guam in *Santos v. Superior Court of Guam,*D.C. C.C. No. 75-067. There the District Court spoke rather unequivocally on this issue and ruled that Section 1382(2) of the Penal Code of Guam has no relevance to felony cases. Thus this Court, which is subject to appellate review by the District Court, cannot but consistently rule that this motion must be denied.

*307In view of the foregoing, the motion to dismiss is hereby denied.

Submit order.
May 24,2012

To Whom It May Concern:

Thank you for allowing us to share ourthoughts with you today. I appreciate the many ways in which the EPA has long protected us from the lack ofwill orbad decisions of state and local governments. Illinois is a prime example ofwhy we need strong federal environmental regulations to protect the common interest when local lawmakers can't or won't.

Our state representatives recently passed and our senators are now considering a ridiculous bill that would enable a contorted andunfair funding structure for an unnecessary new power plant. Ifbuilt, Tenaskawould eventually convert dirty Illinois coal into synthetic natural gas, onlyto create excess electricitywe don't currently need. This electricity would cost residential and commercial customers more based on unproven carbon sequestration technology. Unfortunately, too many ofour state legislators have allowed the prospects oftemporary tmionjobs, temporary vote-trading arrangements, promises ofcollege scholarships and other bribes to cloudtheirjudgment. In exchange for these short-term gains, they're willingto enable the buildingofa plant that will ultimatelythreaten our farmland and water supplies with coal mining, our climate with additional carbon emissions, and our economy with higher electricity bills. I'm willing to pay more for electricity that's cleaner, more sustainable, and fairer for everyone. I'm not willing to pay more for what appears to be another dirty Illinois horse trading deal that will funnel ill-gotten funds to a few at the expense ofthe many.
As a consumerthat's concerned about climate change, I'm grateful for the prospect of
common-sense federal regulations that can limit carbon emissions from new power plants, protecting our battered climate even when too manyofour lawmakers lack the foresight orcourage to make the right decisions.**·nc** ly, 

# (___ / ',**I/~.** 

# 7

I.

# ~~~;Jl::Vt~~ Oehlsen-· N. Marine Drive, Unit S-212 Chicago, IL 60640 (773) 771-3218
### §1221. Definitions

As used in this chapter—

(a) The term "automobile manufacturer" shall mean any person, partnership, corporation, association, or other form of business enterprise engaged in the manufacturing or assembling of passenger cars, trucks, or station wagons, including any person, partnership, or corporation which acts for and is under the control of such manufacturer or assembler in connection with the distribution of said automotive vehicles.

(b) The term "franchise" shall mean the written agreement or contract between any automobile manufacturer engaged in commerce and any automobile dealer which purports to fix the legal rights and liabilities of the parties to such agreement or contract.

(c) The term "automobile dealer" shall mean any person, partnership, corporation, association, or other form of business enterprise resident in the United States or in any Territory thereof or in the District of Columbia operating under the terms of a franchise and engaged in the sale or distribution of passenger cars, trucks, or station wagons.

(d) The term "commerce" shall mean commerce among the several States of the United States or with foreign nations, or in any Territory of the United States or in the District of Columbia, or among the Territories or between any Territory and any State or foreign nation, or between the District of Columbia and any State or Territory or foreign nation.

(e) The term "good faith" shall mean the duty of each party to any franchise, and all officers, employees, or agents thereof to act in a fair and equitable manner toward each other so as to guarantee the one party freedom from coercion, intimidation, or threats of coercion or intimidation from the other party: Provided, That recommendation, endorsement, exposition, persuasion, urging or argument shall not be deemed to constitute a lack of good faith.

(Aug. 8, 1956, ch. 1038, §1, 70 Stat. 1125.)
FAA-AM-78-1

FLOTATION AND SURVIVAL EQUIPMENT STUDIES

Compiled by

E. B. McFadden

FAA Civil Aeromedical Institute

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

January 1978

Document is available to the public through the

National Technical Information Service,

Springfield, Virginia 22161

Prepared For

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

Office of Aviation Medicine

Washington, D.C. 20591
NOTICE

This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of

Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States

Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof.
### §311. Captains of the port

Any officer, including any petty officer, may be designated by the Commandant as captain of the port or ports or adjacent high seas or waters over which the United States has jurisdiction, as the Commandant deems necessary to facilitate execution of Coast Guard duties.

(Added Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §104(c)(1)(A), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4198.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 311, acts Aug. 4, 1949, ch. 393, 63 Stat. 519; Aug. 3, 1950, ch. 536, §13, 64 Stat. 407, related to recall of warrant officers to active duty with consent of the officer, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 88–130, §1(10)(A), Sept. 24, 1963, 77 Stat. 177.
### In The Matter Of: EPA Bristol Bay Public Meetings -- Nondalton August 13, 2014 Midnight Sun Court Reporters 511 W. 9th Ave. Anchorage, AK 99501 Ph. 907-258-7100 Fax 907-276-6727

To open files, click on the desired file type in bookmark on left. For quick saving or searching multiple files, click attachments tab (or paperclip) on left. For best viewing/searching, use Adobe Reader/Acrobat ver. 9 or higher (www.adobe.com).
#### § 201.76 Reweighing.

Stockyard owners, market agencies, dealers, packers, swine contractors and live poultry dealers must reweigh livestock, livestock carcasses, and live poultry or feed on request of any authorized representative of the Secretary.

[78 FR 51664, Aug. 21, 2013]
*IL.-i9~zo;y 

' 

/dp)CJ6-a) -o.:;:; r < -~-~~~~~-==--=---~~~~~~-e_~q.J.:,L\s~C~ed.--1( -- ~oj
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF
      2002





In
      connection with the annual report of
      Rapid Link, Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year
      ended October 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
      on
      the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John A. Jenkins, Chief Executive Officer
      of
      the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      This Report fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and





(2)
      The information contained in this
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition,
      and
      results of operations of the Company.








Date:
                January 22, 2008
            /s/
                John A. JenkinsJohn
                A. JenkinsChief
                Executive Officer and
                Chairman of the Board
# C_2007032EN.01000101.xml

| 14.2.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.2.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

13 February 2007

(2007/C 32/01)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3022 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 157,99 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4534 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,66995 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1660 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,6233 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 88,54 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1110 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | Cyprus pound | 0,5791 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,233 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 254,02 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6965 |
| MTL | Maltese lira | 0,4293 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9100 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 3,3920 |
| SKK | Slovak koruna | 34,397 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,8270 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6811 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5253 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1756 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8953 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0068 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 223,48 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,4280 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,1131 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3561 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 816,81 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5577 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,118 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 34,3220 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,050 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3022

JPY

Japanese yen

157,99

DKK

Danish krone

7,4534

GBP

Pound sterling

0,66995

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1660

CHF

Swiss franc

1,6233

ISK

Iceland króna

88,54

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1110

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CYP

Cyprus pound

0,5791

CZK

Czech koruna

28,233

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

254,02

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6965

MTL

Maltese lira

0,4293

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9100

RON

Romanian leu

3,3920

SKK

Slovak koruna

34,397

TRY

Turkish lira

1,8270

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6811

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5253

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1756

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8953

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0068

KRW

South Korean won

1 223,48

ZAR

South African rand

9,4280

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,1131

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3561

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 816,81

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5577

PHP

Philippine peso

63,118

RUB

Russian rouble

34,3220

THB

Thai baht

44,050

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Form6K






UNITED STATES






SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION






Washington, D.C. 20549






FORM 6-K






REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-16 OR 15D-16






OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934










For the month of November 2011






Commission File No. 001-09987






B + H  O C E A N  C A R R I E R S  L T D.


(Translation of registrant’s name into English)






3rd Floor, Par La Ville Place


14 Par-La-Ville Road


Hamilton HM JX Bermuda


(Address of principal executive offices)






Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.




Form 20-F                      X           Form 40-F




Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b) (1):




Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b) (7):




Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.




Yes           NoX







INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS FORM 6-K REPORT






Set forth herein as Exhibit 3(i).1 is the Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of B+H Ocean Carriers Ltd. effecting the reverse stock split, filed in Liberia on November 28, 2011.




Set forth herein as Exhibit 3(i).2 is the Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of B+H Ocean Carriers Ltd. effecting the forward stock split, filed in Liberia on November 28, 2011.









Signatures






Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.










B+H Ocean Carriers Ltd.


Date:  November 29, 2011                                                                    By: /s/ Michael S. Hudner


Chief Executive Officer
### §1681l. Restrictions on investigative consumer reports

Whenever a consumer reporting agency prepares an investigative consumer report, no adverse information in the consumer report (other than information which is a matter of public record) may be included in a subsequent consumer report unless such adverse information has been verified in the process of making such subsequent consumer report, or the adverse information was received within the three-month period preceding the date the subsequent report is furnished.

(Pub. L. 90–321, title VI, §614, as added Pub. L. 91–508, title VI, §601, Oct. 26, 1970, 84 Stat. 1133.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective upon the expiration of one hundred and eighty days following Oct. 26, 1970, see section 504(d) of Pub. L. 90–321, as added by Pub. L. 91–508, set out as a note under section 1681 of this title.
§ 8.3 Administrative collection of claims. ( a ) The Commission shall act to collect all claims or debts. These collection activities will be undertaken promptly and follow up action will be taken as appropriate in accordance with 31 CFR 901.1.
( b ) The Commission may take any and all appropriate collection actions authorized and required by the Debt Collection Act of 1982, as amended by the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996, 31 U.S.C. 3701 *et seq.* The U.S. Department of the Treasury regulations at 31 CFR 285.2, 285.4, 285.7 and 285.11, and the Federal Claims Collection Standards issued jointly by the Department of Justice and the U.S. Department of the Treasury at 31 CFR parts 900-904 also apply. The Commission has adopted these regulations by cross-reference.
( c ) The Commission will refer to the Dept. of Treasury all debt that has been delinquent for more than 180 days, and may refer to the Dept. of Treasury any debt that has been delinquent for 180 days or less. On behalf of the Commission, the U.S. Department of the Treasury will attempt to collect the debt, in accordance with the statutory and regulatory requirements and authorities applicable to the debt and action. This may include referral to another debt collection center, a private collection contractor, or the Department of Justice for litigation. *See* 31 CFR 285.12 (Transfer of debts to Treasury for collection). This requirement does not apply to any debt that: ( 1 ) Is in litigation or foreclosure;
( 2 ) Will be disposed of under an approved asset sale program;
( 3 ) Has been referred to a private collection contractor for a period of time acceptable to the U.S. Department of the Treasury; or
( 4 ) Will be collected under internal offset procedures within three years after the debt first became delinquent.
( d ) The U.S. Department of the Treasury is authorized to charge a fee for services rendered regarding referred or transferred debts. The Commission will add the fee to the debt as an administrative cost, in accordance with 11 CFR 8.5.