alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
February 15, 2007 Page 1 of 1

Clean Hands Save Lives: Emergency Situations 

After an emergency, finding running water can be difficult. However, keeping your hands clean helps you 

avoid getting sick. It is best to wash your hands with soap and water for 20 seconds. However, when 

water is not available, you can use alcohol-based hand products made for washing hands (sanitizers). 

When should you wash your hands? 

• Before preparing or eating food 

• After going to the bathroom 

• After changing diapers or cleaning up a child who has gone to the bathroom 

• Before and after caring for someone who is sick 

• After handling uncooked foods, particularly raw meat, poultry, or fish 

• After blowing your nose, coughing, or sneezing 

• After handling an animal or animal waste 

• After handling garbage 

• Before and after treating a cut or wound 

Using alcohol-based hand sanitizers 

When your hands are visibly dirty, you should wash them with soap and water when available. However, if 

soap and water are not available, use alcohol-based hand sanitizers. 

• Apply product to the palm of one hand. 

• Rub hands together. 

• Rub the product over all surfaces of hands and fingers until your hands are dry. 

Note: the volume needed to reduce the number of germs on hands varies by product. 

Washing with soap and water 

1. Place your hands together under water (warm water if possible). 

2. Rub your hands together for at least 20 seconds (with soap if possible). Wash all surfaces well, 

including wrists, palms, backs of hands, fingers, and under the fingernails. 

3. Clean the dirt from under your fingernails. 

4. Rinse the soap from your hands. 

5. Dry your hands completely with a clean towel if possible (this helps remove the germs). However, 

if towels are not available it is okay to air dry your hands. 

6. Pat your skin rather than rubbing to avoid chapping and cracking. 

7. If you use a disposable towel, throw it in the trash. 

Remember: If soap and water are not available, use an alcohol-based hand sanitizer.

For more information, visit www.bt.cdc.gov/disasters, 

or call CDC at 800-CDC-INFO (English and Spanish) or 888-232-6348 (TTY).
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Inverted Paradigms Corporation (the
Company), for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven Weldon, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify, to my knowledge that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 780(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ Steven Weldon      
|Steven Weldon          
|Chief Financial Officer

Dated: February 8, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Inverted Paradigms Corporation and will be retained by Inverted Paradigms Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
### §4526. Regulations and orders

#### (a) Authority

The Director shall issue any regulations, guidelines, or orders necessary to carry out the duties of the Director under this chapter or the authorizing statutes, and to ensure that the purposes of this chapter and the authorizing statutes are accomplished.

#### (b) Notice and comment

Any regulations issued by the Director under this section shall be issued after notice and opportunity for public comment pursuant to the provisions of section 553 of title 5.

(Pub. L. 102–550, title XIII, §1319G, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 3952; Pub. L. 110–289, div. A, title I, §1107, July 30, 2008, 122 Stat. 2672.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (a), was in the original "this title", meaning title XIII of Pub. L. 102–550, Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 3941, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of title XIII to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 4501 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

2008—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 110–289, §1107(1), added subsec. (a) and struck out former subsec. (a). Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "The Director shall issue any regulations and orders necessary to carry out the duties of the Director and to carry out this chapter before the expiration of the 18-month period beginning on the appointment of the Director under section 4512 of this title. Such regulations and orders shall be subject to the approval of the Secretary only to the extent provided in subsections (b) and (c) of section 4513 of this title."

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 110–289, §1107(2), struck out subsec. (c). Text read as follows: "The Director may not publish any regulation for comment under subsection (b) of this section unless, not less than 15 days before it is published for comment, the Director has submitted a copy of the regulation, in the form it is intended to be proposed, to the Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate."
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1316 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1316

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify that any amount 
 allowable as a child tax credit under section 24 or an earned income 
credit under section 32 shall not be treated as income for purposes of 
                   any means-tested Federal program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              July 1, 1999

 Mrs. Lincoln introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify that any amount 
 allowable as a child tax credit under section 24 or an earned income 
credit under section 32 shall not be treated as income for purposes of 
                   any means-tested Federal program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COORDINATION OF CHILD TAX CREDIT WITH CERTAIN MEANS-TESTED 
              PROGRAMS.

    Section 24 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to child 
tax credit) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subsection:
    ``(g) Coordination With Certain Means-Tested Programs.--Any refund 
or credit made to an individual by reason of this section shall not be 
treated as income or receipts (or taken into account in determining 
resources) for purposes of determining--
            ``(1) the eligibility of the individual or any other 
        individual for any month for benefits or assistance under any 
        Federal program or any State or local program financed in whole 
        or in part with Federal funds, or
            ``(2) the amount or extent of such benefits or 
        assistance.''

SEC. 2. COORDINATION OF EARNED INCOME CREDIT WITH CERTAIN MEANS-TESTED 
              PROGRAMS.

    Subsection (l) of section 32 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to coordination with certain means-tested programs) is 
amended to read as follows:
    ``(l) Coordination With Certain Means-Tested Programs.--Any refund 
or credit made to an individual by reason of this section, and any 
payment made to such individual by an employer under section 3507, 
shall not be treated as income or receipts (or taken into account in 
determining resources) for purposes of determining--
            ``(1) the eligibility of the individual or any other 
        individual for any month for benefits or assistance under any 
        Federal program or any State or local program financed in whole 
        or in part with Federal funds, or
            ``(2) the amount or extent of such benefits or 
        assistance.''
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ ROBERT GIAMBRONERobert GiambroneChief Financial Officer *
    
    The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as
a separate disclosure document.
#### § 518.6 What are the responsibilities of the Office of Self-Regulation in the certification process?

The Office of Self-Regulation shall be responsible for directing and coordinating the certification process. It shall provide a written report and recommendation to the Commission as to whether a certificate of self-regulation should be issued or denied, and a copy of the report and recommendation to the petitioning tribe.
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: October 15, 2014 TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Do cket Id: OAR–2013-0602 FROM: Chris Sherry, EPA SUBJECT: October 10, 2014 Meeting Regarding Propose d Clean Power Plan for Existing

Power Plants

**SUMMARY** A meeting was held by telephone between EPA staff a nd staff of the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE). The call addresse d clarifying questions about the enforceability provisions in the proposal.
**ATTENDEES**
**ACEEE** Sara Hayes, Senior Manager and Researcher **US EPA** Chris Sherry OAR, OAP, Climate Change Division
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose Francisco Lopez, Appellant.

[824 NYS2d 173]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Alessandro, Jr., at plea; Loehr, J., at sentence), rendered March 28, 2005, convicting him of course of sexual conduct with a child in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s claim that his plea was coerced is unpreserved for appellate review because he failed to move to vacate his plea or otherwise raise this issue before the County Court *(see People v Clarke,*93 NY2d 904, 905 [1999]; *People v Pellegrino,*60 NY2d 636, 637 [1983]; *People v Whitaker,*27 AD3d 499 [2006]; *People v Reels,*17 AD3d 488 [2005]). In any event, the claim is based partly on matters dehors the record which cannot be reviewed on direct appeal *(see People v Rodriguez,*32 AD3d 481 [2006]; *People v Whitaker,*27 AD3d 499 [2006]; *People v Reels, supra*at 489). Moreover, to the extent that the defendant’s claim is reviewable on direct appeal, it is not supported by the record.

The defendant’s contention that the defense counsel rendered *600ineffective assistance by coercing him into pleading guilty is also based in part on off-the-record discussions and, thus, cannot be reviewed on direct appeal *(see People v Reels, supra*at 489). To the extent that this claim can be reviewed, the record does not support the defendant’s claim of coercion. The defendant acknowledged during the plea proceeding that no one threatened, coerced, or forced him to plead guilty, that he was entering his plea freely and voluntarily, and that he was pleading guilty because he was in fact guilty. The defendant also acknowledged that he had discussed the plea with the defense counsel and that he was satisfied with the defense counsel’s representation.

The defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of the remainder of his ineffective assistance of counsel claim *(see People v Eaton,*14 AD3d 577 [2005]; *People v Pryor,*12 AD3d 695 [2004]; *People v Demosthene,*2 AD3d 874 [2003]) and his excessive sentence claim *(see People v Lopez,*6 NY3d 248 [2006]; *People v Hidalgo,*91 NY2d 733, 737 [1998]; *People v Castagna,*18 AD3d 475 [2005]). Adams, J.P., Krausman, Rivera and Lifson, JJ., concur.
3

GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS AGL- Above Ground Level AOI - Area of Interest ATC - Air Traffic Control ATO - Air Traffic Organization AV- Aerial Vehicle C.F.R. - Code of Federal Regulations COA - Certificate of Authorization FAA - Federal Aviation Administration FAR - Federal Aviation Regulation GCS - Ground Control S tation GPS - Global Positioning System LOL- Loss of Link NAS - National Airspace System NOTAM - Notice to Airman PIC - Pilot In Command SOP - Standard Operating Procedures UA- Unmanned Aircraft UAS - Unmanned Aircraft System VFR - Visual Flight Rules VLOS - Visual Line of Site VMC - Visual Meteorological Conditions VO - Visual Observer VTOL- Vertical Takeoff and Landing U.S. Department of Transportation West Building Ground Floor, Room w12 - 140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590
# C_2010221EN.01003001.xml

| 14.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/30

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Stuttgart (Germany) lodged on 16 June 2010 — Bianca Purrucker v Guillermo Vallés Pérez

(Case C-296/10)

()

2010/C 221/48

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Amtsgericht Stuttgart

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Bianca Purrucker

Applicant:

Defendant: Guillermo Vallés Pérez

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Is Article 19(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 (‘Brussels IIA’) (1) applicable if the court of a Member State first seised by one party to resolve matters of parental responsibility is called upon to grant only provisional measures and the court of another Member State subsequently seised by the other party in the same cause of action is called upon to rule on the substance of the matter? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is Article 19(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 (‘Brussels IIA’) (1) applicable if the court of a Member State first seised by one party to resolve matters of parental responsibility is called upon to grant only provisional measures and the court of another Member State subsequently seised by the other party in the same cause of action is called upon to rule on the substance of the matter?

1

| 2. | Is that provision also applicable if a ruling in the isolated proceedings for provisional measures in one Member State is not capable of recognition in another Member State within the meaning of Article 21 of Regulation No 2201/2003? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is that provision also applicable if a ruling in the isolated proceedings for provisional measures in one Member State is not capable of recognition in another Member State within the meaning of Article 21 of Regulation No 2201/2003?

| 3. | Is the seising of a court in a Member State for isolated provisional measures to be equated to seising as to the substance of the matter within the meaning of Article 19(2) of Regulation No 2201/2003 if under the national rules of procedure of that State a subsequent action to resolve the issue as to the substance of the matter must be brought in that court within a specified period in order to avoid procedural disadvantages? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Is the seising of a court in a Member State for isolated provisional measures to be equated to seising as to the substance of the matter within the meaning of Article 19(2) of Regulation No 2201/2003 if under the national rules of procedure of that State a subsequent action to resolve the issue as to the substance of the matter must be brought in that court within a specified period in order to avoid procedural disadvantages?

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000; OJ 2003 L388, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2011282EN.01004901.xml

| 24.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/49

---

Order of the General Court of 14 July 2011 — Apotheke DocMorris v OHIM (Representation of a green and white cross)

(Case T-196/10) (1)

1

2011/C 282/90

Language of the case: German

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 179, 3.7.2010.

1

---
### §625. Stockholders' meetings; books and records; reports; examination

Every corporation organized under the provisions of this subchapter shall hold a meeting of its stockholders annually upon a date fixed in its bylaws, such meeting to be held at its home office in the United States. Every such corporation shall keep at its home office books containing the names of all stockholders thereof, and the names and addresses of the members of its board of directors, together with copies of all reports made by it to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Every such corporation shall make reports to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System at such times and in such form as it may require; and shall be subject to examination once a year and at such other times as may be deemed necessary by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System by examiners appointed by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the cost of such examinations, including the compensation of the examiners, to be fixed by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and to be paid by the Corporation examined.

(Dec. 23, 1913, ch. 6, §25A (par.), formerly §25(a), as added Dec. 24, 1919, ch. 18, 41 Stat. 378; amended Aug. 23, 1935, ch. 614, title II, §203(a), 49 Stat. 704; renumbered §25A, Pub. L. 102–242, title I, §142(e)(2), Dec. 19, 1991, 105 Stat. 2281.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subchapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this section", meaning section 25A of act Dec. 23, 1913, which is classified to this subchapter (§611 et seq.).

#### Codification

Section is comprised of par. 17 (undesignated) of section 25A of act Dec. 23, 1913, which comprises this subchapter. For complete classification of section 25A of this Act, see Codification note set out under section 611 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Section 203(a) of act Aug. 23, 1935, changed name of Federal Reserve Board to Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
#### § 590.800 Identification of restricted eggs.

The shipping container of restricted eggs shall be determined to be satisfactorily identified if such container bears the packer's name and address, the quality of the eggs in the container (e.g., dirties, checks, inedibles, or loss), or the statement “Restricted Eggs—For Processing Only In An Official USDA Egg Products Plant,” for checks or dirties, or “Restricted Eggs—Not To Be Used As Human Food,” for inedibles, loss, and incubator rejects, or “Restricted Eggs—To Be Regraded” for graded eggs which contain more restricted eggs than are allowed in the official standards for U.S. Consumer Grade B shell eggs. The size of the letters of the identification wording shall be as required in § 590.860.

[40 FR 20060, May 8, 1975. Redesignated at 42 FR 32514, June 27, 1977, and further redesignated at 46 FR 63203, Dec. 31, 1981, as amended at 60 FR 49171, Sept. 21, 1995; 63 FR 69972, Dec. 17, 1998]
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ ROBERT GIAMBRONERobert GiambroneChief Financial Officer 
 *
    
    The foregoing certification is being furnished solely
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as
part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841*et seq.*) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below.                

The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than April 1, 2011.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:

                    1.                     *Community State Bank Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust, Union Grove, Wisconsin,*                     to acquire up to 850 shares of Union Bancorporation, Inc., Union Grove, Wisconsin, and increase its ownership up to 38.24 percent, and thereby indirectly increase its control of Community State Bank, Union Grove, Wisconsin.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 4, 2011.

Jennifer J. Johnson,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2011-5384 Filed 3-8-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P