alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 43 (Friday, March 4, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12125-12126]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4992]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human 
Development; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel; Corpus Luteal Contribution to 
Maternal Pregnancy Physiology and Outcomes in Art.
    Date: March 31, 2011.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call)

[[Page 12126]]

    Contact Person: Peter Zelazowski, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Division of Scientific Review, Eunice Kennedy Shriver 
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 
Executive Blvd., Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-6902, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2050455445520e5a454c415a4f57534b49604e49480e474f56"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4434213021366a3e2128253e2b33372f2d042a2d2c6a232b32">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 28, 2011.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-4992 Filed 3-3-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
##### 



Exhibit 32.02 ALLIANCE SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Alliance Semiconductor Corporation (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 26, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeff Parsons, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company. /s/ Jeff Parsons
Jeff Parsons
Chief Financial Officer June 23, 2005
### [§162. Repealed. Pub. L. 85–207, §13, Aug. 28, 1957, 71 Stat. 483]

Section, act Aug. 31, 1954, ch. 1158, 68 Stat. 1021, related to acquisition of reports and material from governmental units, private persons, and agencies. See section 6(b) of this title.
#### § 162.11 Notification.

The Veterinary Official shall notify an accredited veterinarian when there is reason to believe that the accredited veterinarian has not complied with the “Standards for Accredited Veterinarian Duties” as contained in § 161.4 of this subchapter. The notification shall be in writing, with a copy to the State Animal Health Official, and shall include a statement of the basis for the belief that the accredited veterinarian has failed to comply with the Standards and shall notify the accredited veterinarian if the Veterinary Official has arranged to hold an informal conference to discuss the matter.

[57 FR 54915, Nov. 23, 1992, as amended at 75 FR 57658, Sept. 22, 2010; 85 FR 10565, Feb. 25, 2020]
1 

U.S. Department of Agriculture 

Rural Utilities Service

ADDENDUM TO RUS FORM CONTRACT NO. 

On May 23, 2011, the RUS discontinued use of Informational Publication 344-2, the RUS List of 

Material Acceptable for Use on Telecommunications Systems of RUS Borrowers (List of 

Materials.) As a result, any provision of this Agreement with respect to said List of Materials 

shall be null and void, and Owner shall be solely responsible for the acceptance of any products, 

materials, or equipment used by Contractor in fulfilling the terms and conditions of this 

Agreement. 

Date 

 OWNER’S NAME 

 

BY

 TITLE 

 

Date 

 CONTRACTOR’S NAME 

BY

TITLE
### **CHAPTER 55—PETROLEUM MARKETING PRACTICES**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—FRANCHISE PROTECTION

Sec.
2801.
Definitions.
2802.
Franchise relationship.
2803.
Trial and interim franchises.
2804.
Notification of termination or nonrenewal of franchise relationship.
2805.
Enforcement provisions.
2806.
Relationship of statutory provisions to State and local laws.
2807.
Prohibition on restriction of installation of renewable fuel pumps.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—OCTANE DISCLOSURE

2821.
Definitions.
2822.
Automotive fuel rating testing and disclosure requirements.
2823.
Administration and enforcement provisions.
2824.
Relationship of statutory provisions to State and local laws.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—SUBSIDIZATION OF MOTOR FUEL MARKETING

2841.
Study by Secretary of Energy.
# C_2010100EN.01006701.xml

| 17.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 100/67 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 100/67

---

Action brought on 23 February 2010 — Chestnut Medical Technologies v OHIM (PIPELINE)

(Case T-87/10)

2010/C 100/98

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Chestnut Medical Technologies, Inc. (Menlo Park, United States) (represented by: R. Kunz-Hallstein, H. Kunz-Hallstein, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 10 December 2009 in case R 968/2009-2; and |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 10 December 2009 in case R 968/2009-2; and

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘PIPELINE’ for goods in class 10

Community trade mark concerned:

Decision of the examiner: Refused the application for a Community trade mark

Decision of the examiner:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 7(1)(c) of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal erred in its assessment that the Community trade mark concerned has a descriptive character; infringement of Articles 75 of Council Regulation No 207/2009 as the Board of Appeal, by ignoring arguments brought by the applicant, infringed upon the obligation to state the reasons on which the decision has been based.

Pleas in law:

---
§ 78.2 Handling of certificates, permits, and “S” brand permits for interstate movement of animals. ( a ) Any ICVI, other interstate movement document used in lieu of an ICVI, permit, or “S” brand permit required by this part for the interstate movement of animals shall be delivered to the person moving the animals by the shipper or shipper's agent at the time the animals are delivered for movement and shall accompany the animals to their destination and be delivered to the consignee or the person receiving the animals.
( b ) The APHIS representative, State representative, Tribal representative, or accredited veterinarian issuing an ICVI or other interstate movement document used in lieu of an ICVI or a permit, except for permits for entry and “S” brand permits, that is required for the interstate movement of animals under this part shall forward a copy of the ICVI, other interstate movement document used in lieu of an ICVI, or permit to the State animal health official of the State of origin within 5 working days. The State animal health official of the State of origin shall forward a copy of the ICVI, other interstate movement document used in lieu of an ICVI, or permit to the State animal health official of the State of destination within 5 working days.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0047) [78 FR 2069, Jan. 9, 2013]
# C_2010179EN.01001901.xml

| 3.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/19

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bayerischer Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 14 April 2010 — Mathilde Grasser v Freistaat Bayern

(Case C-184/10)

(2010/C 179/31)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bayerischer Verwaltungsgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Mathilde Grasser

Defendant: Freistaat Bayern

Question referred

Are Articles 1(2) and 8(2) and (4) of Directive 91/439/EEC (1) to be interpreted as meaning that a host Member State is entitled to refuse to recognise a driving licence issued by another Member State where entries appearing in the driving licence show that Article 7(1)(b) of that directive has been infringed, if the host Member State has not previously applied to the holder of the licence a measure under Article 8(2) of Directive 91/439/EEC?

---

(1)  Council Directive 91/439/EEC of 29 July 1991 on driving licences; OJ 1991 L 237, p. 1.

---
# C_2010260EN.01002802.xml

| 25.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/28

---

Action brought on 22 July 2010 — Chiavegato v Commission

(Case F-60/10)

()

2010/C 260/39

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Fulvia Chiavegato (Bettembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: F. Frabetti, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the list of officials promoted under the 2009 promotion procedure and, incidentally, the formal measures leading to that decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the list of officials promoted under the 2009 promotion procedure adopted by the Appointing Authority on 13 November 2009 in so far as that list does not contain the applicant’s name and, incidentally, the formal measures leading to that decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the list of officials promoted under the 2009 promotion procedure adopted by the Appointing Authority on 13 November 2009 in so far as that list does not contain the applicant’s name and, incidentally, the formal measures leading to that decision;

| — | Order the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the European Commission to pay the costs.

---
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.1
 
                             CAMBRIDGE HEART, INC.
 
                       COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                         FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                          1995            1996         1997
                                       -----------     -----------  -----------
<S>                                    <C>             <C>          <C>
Net loss.............................. $(2,496,958)    $(4,034,879) $(6,047,619)
Weighted average shares outstanding:
 Shares attributable to common stock
  outstanding.........................   2,814,069 (1)   6,073,865   10,451,560
                                       -----------     -----------  -----------
Net loss per share--basic and
 diluted(2)........................... $    (0.89)     $     (0.66) $     (0.58)
                                       -----------     ===========  ===========
</TABLE>
 
(1) Excludes 312,500 restricted shares which were subject to repurchase by the
Company for minimal consideration if certain specified employment conditions
were not met. These restrictions lapsed on September 29, 1995.
(2) All potential common stock (including restricted stock, options, warrants
and convertible preferred stock) has been excluded from the calculation of
diluted earnings per share as it is anti-dilutive for all periods presented.
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 7, 

2024.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-23-00921-CV

TARA CAMERON AND JEREMY CAMERON, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS 

NEXT FRIEND OF G.C., A MINOR, Appellants

V.

STRIKER INFUSION SERVICES, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 268th District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 23-DCV-302654

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a judgment signed on November 14, 2023. On 

November 20, 2023, appellants filed in the trial court a motion to vacate the 

judgment. On December 6, 2023, appellants filed their notice of appeal. On 

February 22, 2024, this court sent a notice of dismissal for want of jurisdiction 

unless any party filed a response showing meritorious grounds for continuing the 

appeal. The same day, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal pursuant to 
2

Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a). Appellants’ motion states that this appeal is moot because 

on November 27, 2023, the trial court vacated the judgment that was the subject of 

this appeal. 

The mootness doctrine limits courts to deciding cases in which an actual 

controversy exists. See F.D.I.C. v. Nueces Cnty., 886 S.W.2d 766, 767 (Tex. 1994). 

An issue becomes moot when (1) it appears that one seeks to obtain a judgment on 

some controversy, which in reality does not exist or (2) when one seeks a judgment 

on some matter which, when rendered for any reason, cannot have any practical 

legal effect on a then-existing controversy. Alsobrook v. MTGLQ Invs., LP, 657 

S.W.3d 327, 330 (Tex. App. — Dallas 2021), aff'd as modified, 656 S.W.3d 394 

(Tex. 2022). A case becomes moot if there ceases to be a justiciable controversy 

between the parties, such as when “the issues presented are no longer ‘live.’” 

Heckman v. Williamson Cty., 369 S.W.3d 137, 162 (Tex. 2012). 

Accordingly, we grant appellants’ motion to dismiss. 

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Poissant.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TATHAM
OFFSHORE INC. AND SUBSIDIARES AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT JUNE 30, 1999
INCLUDED IN ITS FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             486
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,076
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,730
<PP&E>                                         146,487
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,204
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 163,774
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          102,851
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        176
<COMMON>                                           261
<OTHER-SE>                                      60,486
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   163,774
<SALES>                                         39,846
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,846
<CGS>                                           22,234
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,234
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,711
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,115
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,261)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,316)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (221)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,537)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.43)


</TABLE>
§ 9033.2 Candidate and committee certifications; threshold submission. ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) A candidate seeking to become eligible to receive Presidential primary matching fund payments shall make the certifications set forth in 11 CFR 9033.2(b) to the Commission in a written statement signed by the candidate. The candidate may submit the certifications at any time after January 1 of the year immediately preceding the Presidential election year.
( 2 ) The Commission will not consider a candidate's threshold submission until the candidate has submitted candidate certifications that meet the requirements of this section.
( b ) *Certifications.* ( 1 ) The candidate shall certify that he or she is seeking nomination by a political party to the Office of President in more than one State. For purposes of this section, in order for a candidate to be deemed to be seeking nomination by a political party to the office of President, the party whose nomination the candidate seeks must have a procedure for holding a primary election, as defined in 11 CFR 9032.7, for nomination to that office. For purposes of this section, the term *political party* means an association, committee or organization which nominates an individual for election to the office of President. The fact that an association, committee or organization qualifies as a political party under this section does not affect the party's status as a national political party for purposes of 52 U.S.C. 30116(a)(1)(B) and 30116(a)(2)(B).
( 2 ) The candidate and the candidate's authorized committee(s) shall certify that they have not incurred and will not incur expenditures in connection with the candidate's campaign for nomination, which expenditures are in excess of the limitations under 11 CFR part 9035.
( 3 ) The candidate and the candidate's authorized committee(s) shall certify: ( i ) That they have received matchable contributions totaling more than $5,000 in each of at least 20 States; and
( ii ) That the matchable contributions are from individuals who are residents of the State for which their contributions are submitted.
( iii ) A maximum of $250 of each individual's aggregate contributions will be considered as matchable contributions for the purpose of meeting the thresholds of this section.
( iv ) For purposes of this section, contributions of an individual who maintains residences in more than one State may only be counted toward the $5,000 threshold for the State from which the earliest contribution was made by that contributor.
( c ) *Threshold submission.* To become eligible to receive matching payments, the candidate shall submit records of the contributions described in 11 CFR 9033.2(b)(3) to the Commission for review. The submission shall follow the format and requirements of 11 CFR 9036.1.
[56 FR 35930, July 29, 1991, 79 FR 77851, Dec. 29, 2014; 89 FR 220, Jan. 2, 2024]
# C_2011232EN.01002903.xml

| 6.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 232/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 232/29

---

Order of the General Court of 15 June 2011 — Ax v Council

(Case T-259/10) (1)

(Action for annulment - European Union financial assistance to a Member State experiencing serious economic or financial disruption - Regulation establishing the conditions and procedures under which European Union financial assistance may be granted - Article 263, fourth paragraph, TFEU - No direct concern - Inadmissibility)

(2011/C 232/53)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Thomas Ax (Neckargemünd, Germany) (represented by: J. Baumann, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: T. Middleton, M. Bauer and D. Gregorio Merino, Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Smulders, J.-P Keppenne, H. Krämer, Agents) and Republic of Latvia (represented by: M. Borkoveca and A. Nikolajeva, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Council Regulation (EU) No 407/2010 of 11 May 2010 establishing a European financial stabilisation mechanism (OJ 2010 L 118, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Mr Thomas Ax is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Thomas Ax is ordered to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

| 3. | The Republic of Latvia and the European Commission are ordered to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Republic of Latvia and the European Commission are ordered to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 234, 28.8.2010.

---