alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2415. Powers of the Center

In carrying out its functions, the Center is authorized—

(1) to enter into contracts or other funding arrangements, or modifications thereof, in order to carry out the provisions of this chapter;

(2) to organize and conduct, directly by contract or other funding arrangements with other public agencies or private organizations, conferences, meetings, seminars, workshops, or other forums for the presentation and dissemination of relevant information generated or collected pursuant to the provisions of this chapter;

(3) to make such studies and recommendations to the President and to Congress as may be necessary to carry out the functions of the Center;

(4) to implement a program and secure necessary facilities for the collection, collation, analysis, and interpretation of data and information as required in order to carry out the public information functions under this chapter; and

(5) to undertake such other studies, reviews, activities, and to make such recommendations and reports as may be required to carry out the functions of the Center.

(Pub. L. 94–136, title II, §205, Nov. 28, 1975, 89 Stat. 739.)
AAM-12-110-E December 12, 2011

Exemption No. 10400 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2011-1356

Mr. Pascal Lardy

President Heliflite Too, Inc.

2709 Oak Tree Drive Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309

Dear Mr. Lardy:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated December 2, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Heliflite Too, Inc. (Heliflite Too), for an exemption from part 120 Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would permit Heliflite Too, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Heliflite Too.

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs.2

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703;

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Heliflite Too, Inc., an exemption from 14 CFR part 120 to the extent necessary to permit Heliflite Too, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program, subject to the

conditions and limitations described below.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Employees of Heliflite Too are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the Heliflite Too part 135 operation, not under the part 91.

This exemption terminates January 31, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/
James R. Fraser, M.D. Deputy Federal Air Surgeon

Enclosure
# C_2010209EN.01005401.xml

| 31.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/54

---

Action brought on 26 May 2010 — Adriaansen v EIB

(Case F-35/10)

()

2010/C 209/84

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Mary Lucie Adriaansen (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: A.-M. Schmit, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Investment Bank

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the EIB’s decision refusing to provide the applicant with information on the value of the pension to which her former husband is entitled.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | annul the EIB’s decision of 18 March 2010; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the EIB’s decision of 18 March 2010;

| — | order the EIB to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the EIB to pay the costs;

| — | order the interim execution of the judgement to be given, notwithstanding appeal and without security; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the interim execution of the judgement to be given, notwithstanding appeal and without security;

| — | reserve to the applicant all other rights, dues, pleas in law and actions |
| --- | --- |

—

reserve to the applicant all other rights, dues, pleas in law and actions

---
#### § 557.9 [Reserved]
# C_2007060EN.01000701.xml

| 15.3.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/7

---

CALL FOR PROPOSALS — ref: GP/D/ReferNet/001/06

CALL FOR PROPOSALS

Grant award notice

ReferNet — European Network of Reference and Expertise in VET

(2007/C 60/05)

1.   Contracting authority

| Cedefop |
| --- |
| European Centre for Development of Vocational Training |
| attn: Mr G. Paraskevaidis |
| 123 Europe Street, PO Box 22427 |
| GR-55102 Thessaloniki |

Cedefop

European Centre for Development of Vocational Training

attn: Mr G. Paraskevaidis

123 Europe Street, PO Box 22427

GR-55102 Thessaloniki

Contact person:

| Ms Clotilde Assumel-Lurdin |
| --- |
| Tel. (30-2310) 490 287 |
| Fax (30-2310) 490 028 |
| E-mail: c4t-services@cedefop.europa.eu. |

Ms Clotilde Assumel-Lurdin

Tel. (30-2310) 490 287

Fax (30-2310) 490 028

E-mail: c4t-services@cedefop.europa.eu.

Previous publication:
  OJ C 61 of 14.3.2006, p. 4.

Previous publication:

2.   Grant awards

| Beneficiary name | Address | Grant Agreement reference | Date of Signature | Duration of Grant Agreement | Grant amount
  (EUR) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| National Institute of Technology — IT | Akersveien 24C |
| P.O. Box 2608 |
| St.Hanshaugen |
| N-0131 Oslo |

Beneficiary name

Address

Grant Agreement reference

Date of Signature

Duration of Grant Agreement

Grant amount

(EUR)

National Institute of Technology — IT

Akersveien 24C

P.O. Box 2608

St.Hanshaugen

N-0131 Oslo

2006-0073

13.12.2006

12 months

29 000

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 157 (Tuesday, August 14, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 48429]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-19955]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security

15 CFR Part 774

The Commerce Control List

CFR Correction

    In the Federal Register published on July 26, 2012, on page 43711, 
in the third column, in instruction 3.C., ``5A003'' is corrected to 
read ``5A002''.
[FR Doc. 2012-19955 Filed 8-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alliance Laundry Systems LLC,
Alliance Laundry Corporation and Alliance Laundry Holdings LLC (the Companies) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bruce P.
Rounds, Vice President, and Chief Financial Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Companies.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|/s/ BRUCE P. ROUNDS                       
|Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



August 10, 2005
### §1926. Cadet applicants; preappointment travel to Academy

The Secretary is authorized to expend appropriated funds for selective preappointment travel to the Academy for orientation visits of cadet applicants.

(Added Pub. L. 98–557, §24(a), Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 2872, §181a; renumbered §1926, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §110(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4212.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 181a of this title as this section.
§ 590.935 Means of conveyance and equipment used in handling egg products offered for entry to be maintained in sanitary condition. ( a ) Compartments of means of conveyance transporting any egg products to the United States, and all chutes, platforms, racks, tables, tools, utensils, and all other devices used in moving and handling any egg products offered for entry into the United States, must be maintained in accordance with part 416.4 of this chapter.
( b ) All conveyances containing imported liquid egg products must be sealed by inspection authorities in the exporting country. Seals may be broken at U.S. port-of-entry for purposes of inspection by program inspectors or customs officers.
Exhibit 13.1  CERTIFICATION  Pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,
United States Code)  Pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section
1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of
Millicom International Cellular, S.A. a company incorporated under the laws of
the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg (the Company),
hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:  The Annual Report on
Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006
(the Report) of the Company
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.  Date:
  April 20, 2007
  BY
  /s/ MARC BEULSName:  Marc BeulsTitle:    Chief
  Executive Officer
### §103. Designation of reports

All reports covering any of the statistics collected under the provisions of this subchapter shall be designated as "Special Reports" followed by the name of whatever bureau or agency of the Department of Commerce is designated by the Secretary to collect and compile such statistics.

(Aug. 31, 1954, ch. 1158, 68 Stat. 1018.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 13, U.S.C., 1952 ed., §111 (Mar. 6, 1902, ch. 139, §7, 32 Stat. 52; June 7, 1906, ch. 3048, 34 Stat. 218; June 18, 1929, ch. 28, §3, 46 Stat. 21; 1939 Reorganization Plan No. II, §4(e), eff. July 1, 1939, 4 F.R. 2731, 53 Stat. 1431; 1940 Reorganization Plan No. III, §3, eff. June 30, 1940, 5 F.R. 2107, 54 Stat. 1232; June 25, 1947, ch. 124, 61 Stat. 163; Sept. 7, 1950, ch. 910, §4, 64 Stat. 785).

Section was taken from that part of section 111 of title 13, U.S.C., 1952 ed., which related to designation of reports prepared under that section. For remainder of such section 111, see this subchapter, and Distribution Table.

Section 111 of title 13, U.S.C. 1952 ed., provided that the reports prepared under the provisions of that section should be designated as "Special Reports of the Census Office". In this revised section it is provided that such reports shall be designated as " 'Special Reports' followed by the name of whatever bureau or agency of the Department of Commerce is designated by the Secretary to collect and compile such statistics". This change conforms with 1950 Reorganization Plan No. 5, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1263, which transferred the functions of all agencies, bureaus, officers, and employees of the Department of Commerce to the Secretary, and vested power in him to delegate any of such transferred functions, or any of his other functions, to any of such agencies, bureaus, officers, or employees. See section 4 of this title.

Changes were made in phraseology.

Section 7 of the act of Mar. 6, 1902, ch. 139, 32 Stat. 52, cited above, from which section 111 of title 13, U.S.C., 1952 ed., was derived, contained additional provisions (which were not classified to the United States Code) relating to the duty of the Director of the Census to publish the Official Register of the United States, and to the transmission to him of the data to be included therein. Such provisions have been omitted as they were superseded by act Mar. 3, 1925, ch. 421, §2(a)(b), 43 Stat. 1105, which was formerly classified to section 3 of title 13, U.S.C., 1952 ed., and which, in turn, was repealed by section 5 of act Aug. 28, 1935, ch. 795, 49 Stat. 957, and superseded by sections 1 and 2 of that act. Such sections 1 and 2, as amended, are classified to section 654 of title 5, U.S.C., 1952 ed., Executive Departments and Government Officers and Employees. Under that section, the Official Register is published by the Civil Service Commission. Provisions relating to its distribution are contained in sections 139, 139a and 280a of title 44, U.S.C., 1952 ed., Public Printing and Documents.
#### § 309.14 Brucellosis-reactor goats.

Goats which have reacted to a test for brucellosis shall not be slaughtered in an official establishment.
### §339a. Resolution of clearing banks

#### (a) Conservatorship or receivership

#### (1) Appointment

The Board may appoint a conservator or receiver to take possession and control of any uninsured State member bank which operates, or operates as, a multilateral clearing organization pursuant to section 4422 1 of this title to the same extent and in the same manner as the Comptroller of the Currency may appoint a conservator or receiver for a national bank.

#### (2) Powers

The conservator or receiver for an uninsured State member bank referred to in paragraph (1) shall exercise the same powers, functions, and duties, subject to the same limitations, as a conservator or receiver for a national bank.

#### (b) Board authority

The Board shall have the same authority with respect to any conservator or receiver appointed under subsection (a), and the uninsured State member bank for which the conservator or receiver has been appointed, as the Comptroller of the Currency has with respect to a conservator or receiver for a national bank and the national bank for which the conservator or receiver has been appointed.

#### (c) Bankruptcy proceedings

The Board (in the case of an uninsured State member bank which operates, or operates as, such a multilateral clearing organization) may direct a conservator or receiver appointed for the bank to file a petition pursuant to title 11, in which case, title 11 shall apply to the bank in lieu of otherwise applicable Federal or State insolvency law.

(Dec. 13, 1913, ch. 6, §9B, as added Pub. L. 106–554, §1(a)(5) [title I, §112(b)], Dec. 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A–392.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 4422 of this title, referred to in subsec. (a)(1), was repealed by Pub. L. 111–203, title VII, §740, July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 1729.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as section 9B of act Dec. 13, 1913, and not as part of section 9 of such act which comprises this subchapter.

1 See References in Text note below.
-  About RD                  -  Key Priorities                    -  Priority Points Program Chart 
                -  Rural Development Priorities: FY 2023 
                -  Rural Development Priorities: FY 2024 
              -  History 
              -  Farm Bill 
              -  Grant Awards 
              -  Careers at Rural Development                    -  Current Job Opportunities 
              -  Rural Data Gateway 
              -  Leadership                    -  Under Secretary  
                -  Deputy Under Secretary 
                -  Chief Operating Officer 
                -  Administrators 
                -  State Directors 
              -  Agencies                    -   Rural Business-Cooperative Service                      -  Rural Business-Cooperative Service Contacts 
                -   Rural Housing Service                      -  Rural Housing Service Contacts 
                -   Rural Utilities Service                      -  Rural Utilities Service Contacts 
              -  Offices                    -  Business Center 
                -  Civil Rights                       -  Civil Rights Contacts 
                  -  Equal Employment Opportunity Branch 
                  -  Program Compliant Processing and Resolution Branch 
                  -  Program Compliance and Training Branch 
                  -  Posters 
                  -  Civil Rights Training 
                  -  Limited English Proficiency 
                  -  Civil Rights Library 
                  -  Accessibility Statement 
                -  External Affairs 
                -  Innovation Center                      -  Innovation Center Divisions 
                -  Risk Office 
                -  State Offices 
                -  Servicing Office 
              -  Initiatives                    -  Healthy Food Financing Initiative 
                -  Interagency Working Group on Cooperative Development                      -  Partners                        -  Federal 
                    -  Tribal 
                    -  State & Local 
                    -  Private Sector 
                  -  Funding Resources                        -  Grant Funding 
                    -  Equity Capital 
                    -  Loans and Guaranteed Loans 
                    -  Revolving Loan Funds 
                    -  Crowd Sourcing 
                    -  Technical Assistance 
                    -  Other 
                  -  Development Tools 
                  -  Publications & Information 
                -  Promise Zones 
                -  Property Appraisal and Valuation Equity (PAVE) 
                -  Rural Placemaking 
                -  Substantially Underserved Trust Area (SUTA) 
              -  Tribal Relations                    -  Tribal Relations Events 

# Priority Points Program Chart

                  - English
                  - Spanish

Programs will be added as funding announcements are issued or program windows open. The following programs support the key priorities through either scoring criteria or discretionary points.
<PAGE>



                                                                EXHIBIT 23.1
                              CONSENT OF KPMG LLP

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Clarus Corporation and Subsidiaries:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-42600, 333-42602, 333-42604, 333-42606, 333-59193 and 333-71838 on
Form S-8) of Clarus Corporation of our reports dated February 8, 2002 relating
to the consolidated balance sheets of Clarus Corporation and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive loss, and cash flows for the
years then ended and the related financial statement schedule, which reports
appear in the December 31, 2001 annual report on Form 10-K of Clarus
Corporation.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
March 25, 2002
# C_2011355EN.01001802.xml

| 3.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 355/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 355/18

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 October 2011 — Scatizza v OHIM — Jacinto (Horse Couture)

(Case T-238/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for registration of the Community figurative mark Horse Couture - Earlier national figurative mark HORSE - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

2011/C 355/32

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Stephanie Scatizza (Breganzona, Switzerland) (represented by: P. Perani and P. Pozzi, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Schäffner, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Manuel Jacinto, Lda (São Paio de Oleiros, Portugal)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

da

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 5 March 2010 (Case R 723/2009-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Manuel Jacinto, Lda and Stephanie Scatizza.

da

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Stephanie Scatizza to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Stephanie Scatizza to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 209, 31.7.2010.

1

---
# C_2010179EN.01005902.xml

| 3.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/59

---

Action brought on 12 May 2010 — de Fays v Commission

(Case F-30/10)

(2010/C 179/104)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Philippe de Fays (Malèves Sainte Marie Wastinnes, Belgium) (represented by: N. Soldatos, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision refusing to recognise the occupational nature of the disease suffered by the applicant.

Form of order sought

| — | annul the decisions of the appointing authority of 8 September 2009 and 12 February 2010 and recognise that the applicant has been unfit to work because of occupational disease since 15 May 2005; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decisions of the appointing authority of 8 September 2009 and 12 February 2010 and recognise that the applicant has been unfit to work because of occupational disease since 15 May 2005;

| — | alternatively and secondarily, again appoint a medical committee consisting of doctors with expertise in diseases caused by ionising radiation with the task of establishing whether, in the course of carrying out his professional duties, the applicant was exposed to the risk of contracting a disease caused by ionising radiation; |
| --- | --- |

—

alternatively and secondarily, again appoint a medical committee consisting of doctors with expertise in diseases caused by ionising radiation with the task of establishing whether, in the course of carrying out his professional duties, the applicant was exposed to the risk of contracting a disease caused by ionising radiation;

| — | order the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Commission to pay the costs.

---