alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 8 (Wednesday, January 12, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2144-2145]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-516]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-74,714]


Quest Diagnostics, Inc. Information Technology Help Desk Services 
Including On-Site Leased Workers From Modis, West Norriton, PA; Amended 
Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment 
Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(``Act''), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a 
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance 
on December 6, 2010, applicable to workers of Quest Diagnostics, Inc., 
Information Technology Help Desk Services, West Norriton, Pennsylvania. 
The workers are engaged in activities related to the supply of internal 
information technology (IT) support services. The notice will be 
published soon in the Federal Register.
    At the request of a petitioner, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The company reports that 
workers leased from Modis were employed on-site at the West Norriton, 
Pennsylvania location of Quest Diagnostics, Inc., Information 
Technology Help Desk

[[Page 2145]]

Services. The Department has determined that these workers were 
sufficiently under the operational control of Quest Diagnostics, Inc., 
Information Technology Help Desk Services to be considered leased 
workers.
    Based on these findings, the Department is amending this 
certification to include workers leased from Modis working on-site at 
the West Norriton, Pennsylvania location of Quest Diagnostics, Inc., 
Information Technology Help Desk Services.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-74,714 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Quest Diagnostics, Inc., Information Technology 
Help Desk Services, including on-site leased workers from Modis, 
West Norriton, Pennsylvania, who became totally or partially 
separated from employment on or after October 3, 2009, through 
December 6, 2012, and all workers in the group threatened with total 
or partial separation from employment on the date of certification 
through two years from the date of certification, are eligible to 
apply for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the 
Trade Act of 1974, as amended.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 22nd day of December 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011-516 Filed 1-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
### §1525. Special studies; special compilations, lists, bulletins, or reports; clearinghouse for technical information; transcripts or copies; cost payments for special work; joint projects: cost apportionment, waiver

The Secretary of Commerce is authorized, upon the request of any person, firm, organization, or others, public or private, to make special studies on matters within the authority of the Department of Commerce; to prepare from its records special compilations, lists, bulletins, or reports; to perform the functions authorized by section 1152 of this title; and to furnish transcripts or copies of its studies, compilations, and other records; upon the payment of the actual or estimated cost of such special work.

In the case of nonprofit organizations, research organizations, or public organizations or agencies, the Secretary may engage in joint projects, or perform services, on matters of mutual interest, the cost of which shall be apportioned equitably, as determined by the Secretary, who may, however, waive payment of any portion of such costs by others, when authorized to do so under regulations approved by the Office of Management and Budget.

(Pub. L. 91–412, §1, Sept. 25, 1970, 84 Stat. 864; 1970 Reorg. Plan No. 2, §102, eff. July 1, 1970, 35 F.R. 7959, 84 Stat. 2085.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions vested by law (including reorganization plan) in Bureau of the Budget or Director of Bureau of the Budget transferred to President by section 101 of Reorg. Plan No. 2 of 1970, eff. July 1, 1970, 35 F.R. 7959, 84 Stat. 2085, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees. Section 102 of Reorg. Plan No. 2 of 1970 redesignated Bureau of the Budget as Office of Management and Budget.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 6613** 

DAVID LAMONT GIBSON , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. TIMOTHY STEWART, Warden , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt
. Deborah K. Chasanow , Senior District Judge. ( 8:15

- cv - 03304

- DKC )

Submitted : September 29, 2016 Decided: Octob e r 4, 2016

Before SHEDD , KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
David Lamont Gibson , Appellant Pro Se. Jakarra Jenise Jones, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: David Lamont Gibson, a District of Columbia prisoner incarcerated in Maryland , seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S .C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies th is standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Gibson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 conte ntions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISS ED
### §62. List of shareholders

The president and cashier of every national banking association shall cause to be kept at all times a full and correct list of the names and residences of all the shareholders in the association, and the number of shares held by each, in the office where its business is transacted. Such list shall be subject to the inspection of all the shareholders and creditors of the association, and the officers authorized to assess taxes under State authority, during business hours of each day in which business may be legally transacted. A copy of such list, verified by the oath of such president or cashier, shall be transmitted to the Comptroller of the Currency within ten days of any demand therefor made by him.

(R.S. §5210; May 18, 1953, ch. 59, §1, 67 Stat. 27.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §5210 derived from act June 3, 1864, ch. 106, §40, 13 Stat. 111, which was the National Bank Act. See section 38 of this title.

#### Amendments

1953—Act May 18, 1953, changed the requirement for annual transmission of a copy of the shareholders list to the Comptroller of the Currency by authorizing the Comptroller to acquire such copy at any time on 10 days' notice.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Application to District of Columbia

Provisions of this section were made applicable to banks, etc., in the District of Columbia by act Mar. 4, 1933, ch. 274, §4, 47 Stat. 1567.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Exception as to Transfer of Functions

Functions vested by any provision of law in Comptroller of the Currency, referred to in this section, not included in transfer of functions to Secretary of the Treasury, see note set out under section 1 of this title.
###### Editorial Note on Subpart A of Part 82

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subpart A of part 82 appear at 78 FR 19083, Mar. 29, 2013.

#### § 82.16 Extraordinary emergencies; applicability of regulations.

When, in accordance with sec. 10407 of the Animal Health Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 8306), the Secretary of Agriculture determines that an extraordinary emergency exists because of Newcastle disease, the regulations in this subpart regarding interstate movement shall be applicable to intrastate movement within any State or portion of a State subject to the Secretary's declaration of extraordinary emergency until such time as the Secretary terminates that declaration.

[68 FR 1517, Jan. 13, 2003]
§ 146.3 Participation. ( a ) Any commercial table-egg layer pullet flock, table-egg producer, raised-for-release upland game bird premises, and raised-for-release waterfowl premises and any commercial upland game bird, commercial waterfowl, meat-type chicken or meat-type turkey slaughter plant, including its affiliated flocks, may participate in the Plan when the producer or plant has demonstrated, to the satisfaction of the Official State Agency, that its facilities, personnel, and practices are adequate for carrying out the relevant special provisions of this part and has signed an agreement with the Official State Agency to comply with the relevant special provisions of this part.
( b ) Each participant shall comply with the Plan throughout the operating year, or until released by the Official State Agency.
( c ) A participating slaughter plant shall participate with all of the commercial upland game bird, commercial waterfowl, meat-type chicken, spent fowl, and/or meat-type turkey flocks that are processed at the facility, including affiliated flocks. Affiliated flocks must participate through a written agreement with a participating slaughter plant that is approved by the Official State Agency.
( d ) Participation in the Plan shall entitle the participant to use the Plan emblem reproduced as follows:
[71 FR 56328, Sept. 26, 2006, as amended at 74 FR 14716, Apr. 1, 2009; 79 FR 38765, July 9, 2014; 81 FR 53250, Aug. 12, 2016]
§ 700.525 Use of government information or expertise. ( a ) Commission personnel may engage in teaching, lecturing and writing about the relocation program, provided the Information which they present is public knowledge or would be made available to the public upon request.
( b ) Employees shall inform their supervisors in advance of any teaching, writing, or lecturing activity which relates to the Commission operations. The Commissioners may at their discretion exercise the right of review and approval of materials to be presented.
( c ) Employees must obtain supervisory approval for release of information considered confidential, and release of information not previously published as public information.
( d ) Disclosure of information from records shall conform with the provisions of the Freedom of information and the Privacy Acts (5 U.S.C. 552). An employee may not release confidential information maintained by the Commission and available to the employee because of his position as an employee of the Commission. Violation of this prohibition may result in prosecution under the terms of the Privacy Act in addition to any disciplinary penalties levied by the employee's supervisor.
( e ) Commission personnel may not accept compensation for an article, speech, consultant service, or other activity if it involves the use of information obtained as the result of Government employment which is not available to the general public as described in paragraph (a) of this section, or results in an actual or appearance of conflict of interest.
( f ) Unless there is a definite Commission position on a matter which is the subject of an employee's writing or speech, and the individual has been authorized by the Commissioners to present that position officially, the employee shall expressly present his or her views on the matter as his or her own and not as those of the Commission.
( g ) The right of an employee to express personal opinions is respected. However, once the Commission has established policy and procedure, every employee is obligated to carry out all lawful regulations, orders, and assignments, and to support the programs of the Commission as long as they are part of recognized public policy.
( h ) In dealing with the public and with relocatees, employees should avoid issuing opinions or decisions contrary to Commission policy which can be mistaken as official Commission policy.
Summary of Phone Conversation with the South Coast Air Quality Management District 

Phone conversation between Nicole Law (EPA) and Victor Juan (SCAQMD) on April 26, 2012 at 

approximately 8:50 am. 

This conversation was for Nicole to confirm information regarding wastewater disposal at oil production 

facilities in SCAQMD. Victor stated that the majority of wastewater is either disposed of in reinjection 

wells or sent to sanitary sewerage systems. He noted that there are oil producers who collect 

wastewater from other producers and reinject it in their reinjection wells. Nicole asked if the water is 

pretreated before it is reinjected or sent to the sewage system and Victor confirmed that the 

wastewater is sometimes pretreated at the oil production facility before disposal because the 

Department of Energy requires wastewater meet certain quality requirements before it is reinjected 

into the ground and the sewage municipalities also require wastewater meet certain quality 

requirements before they can accept it.
§ 51.9 Claims not allowed. Claims for compensation for animals destroyed because of brucellosis shall not be allowed if any of the following circumstances exist: ( a ) If the claimant has failed to comply with any of the requirements of this part.
( b ) If the existence of brucellosis in the animal was determined based on the results of an official test, as defined in § 78.1 of this chapter, and specific instructions for the administration of the official test had not previously been issued to the individual performing the test by APHIS and the State animal health official.
( c ) If all cattle, bison, and swine eligible for testing in the claimant's herd have not been tested for brucellosis under APHIS or State supervision.
( d ) If the animals are: ( 1 ) Barrows or gilts maintained for feeding purposes; or
( 2 ) Spayed heifers or steers, unless the steers are work oxen, or unless the spayed heifers or steers are unweaned animals in a herd approved for depopulation in accordance with § 51.3 of this part.
( e ) If the animals are classified as reactors and are unofficial vaccinates, unless there is either a record of a negative official test made not less than 30 days following the date of unofficial vaccination or unless other APHIS approved tests show the unofficial vaccinates are affected with virulent Brucella.
( f ) If there is substantial evidence that the owner or his agent has in any way been responsible for any unlawful or improper attempt to obtain indemnity funds for such animal.
( g ) If, at the time of test or condemnation, the animals belonged to or were upon the premises of any person to whom they had been sold for slaughter; shipped for slaughter, or delivered for slaughter.
( h ) If any known brucellosis reactor animal remains in the herd, unless, in the opinion of the Veterinarian in Charge, a reasonable search has been made for the brucellosis reactor animal and the brucellosis reactor animal could not be found and removed.
( i ) If the animals are brucellosis reactor animals which are slaughtered other than as part of a herd depopulation, and which are from a herd: ( 1 ) That was already classified as a “herd known to be affected” at the time the animals were identified as brucellosis reactor animals and
( 2 ) for which an approved action plan or approved individual herd plan (as defined in § 78.1 of this chapter) was not in effect at the time the claim was filed.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0047) [42 FR 64336, Dec. 23, 1977. Redesignated at 46 FR 13674, Feb. 23, 1981, and 47 FR 53324, Nov. 26, 1982, and amended at 47 FR 53324, Nov. 26, 1982; 48 FR 57472, Dec. 30, 1983; 50 FR 11993, Mar. 27, 1985; 50 FR 47036, Nov. 14, 1985; 51 FR 11300, Apr. 2, 1986; 54 FR 32435, Aug. 8, 1989; 56 FR 18506, Apr. 23, 1991; 63 FR 47423, Sept. 8, 1998]
# C_2007095EN.01005501.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/55

---

Action brought on 9 March 2007 — SHS Polar Sistemas Informáticos v OHIM — Polaris Software Lab (POLARIS)

(Case T-79/07)

(2007/C 95/110)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: SHS Polar Sistemas Informáticos, SL (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: C. Hernández Hernández, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Polaris Software Lab Ltd (Chennai, India)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

| — | That the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market dated 8 January 2007 in Case R 658/2006-2 be annulled; |
| --- | --- |

—

That the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market dated 8 January 2007 in Case R 658/2006-2 be annulled;

| — | that OHIM bears its own cost and pays those incurred by the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

that OHIM bears its own cost and pays those incurred by the applicant.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: Polaris Software Lab Ltd

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘POLARIS ’for goods and services in classes 9 and 42 — application No 3 267 713

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited: The Community word mark ‘POLAR ’for goods and services in classes 9, 38 and 42

Mark or sign cited:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld for all the contested goods in class 9

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulment of the Opposition Division's decision

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Violation of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 40/94 as i) the earlier trade mark can be applied to software destined to a non-specialist consumer, which could give rise to a confusion, ii) the small visual and phonetic differences between the two conflicting trade marks do not suffice to avoid a likelihood of confusion and iii) both marks are connected to the same meaning.

Pleas in law:

---
Exhibit 13.2
------------

                    PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    -----------------------------------------

In connection with this Annual Report of Frontline Ltd. (the "Company") on Form
20-F for the annual period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on or about the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Tom E. Jebsen, the Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
request.

Date: June 30, 2005


/s/ Tom E. Jebsen
Principal Financial Officer
§ 392.5 Filing procedures. ( a ) Any interested person may file a petition with FSIS. For purposes of this part, an “interested person” is any individual, partnership, corporation, association, or public or private organization.
( b ) To file a petition with FSIS, a person should submit the petition to the FSIS Docket Clerk, Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service, Room 2534 South Building, 1400 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20250-3700.
( c ) Once a petition is submitted in accordance with this part, it will be filed by the FSIS Docket Clerk, stamped with the date of filing, and assigned a petition number. Once a petition has been filed, FSIS will notify the petitioner in writing and provide the petitioner with the number assigned to the petition and the Agency contact for the petition. The petition number should be referenced by the petitioner in all contacts with the Agency regarding the petition.
( d ) If a petitioner elects to withdraw a petition submitted in accordance with this part, the petitioner should inform FSIS in writing. Once a petition has been withdrawn, the petitioner may re-submit the petition at any time.
# C_2007096EN.01002804.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/28

---

Order of the President of the Seventh Chamber of the Court of 21 March 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Estonia

(Case C-178/06) (1)

1

(2007/C 96/54)

Language of the case: Estonian

Language of the case: Estonian

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 143, 17.6.2006.

1

---