alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT 12.1




                          TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION

                 CALCULATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                Three Months Ended      Six Months Ended       
                                                     March 31,              March 31,
                                                ------------------      ---------------- 
                                                1998          1997      1998        1997 
                                                ----          ----      ----        ---- 
                                                         (Dollars in Millions)
<S>                                             <C>           <C>       <C>         <C> 

Consolidated income
   before income taxes......................    $ 53          $ 81      $116        $145 
                                                ----          ----      ----        ----
Fixed charges:
   Interest.................................     239           225       473         452
   Portion of rent expense
      representative of the
      interest factor (deemed 
      to be one-third)......................       1             1         2           1
                                                ----          ----      ----        ----

Total fixed charges.........................     240           226       475         453
                                                ----          ----      ----        ----
Earnings available
   for fixed charges........................    $293          $307      $591        $598
                                                ====          ====      ====        ==== 

Ratio of earnings to
   fixed charges<F1>........................    1.22          1.36      1.24        1.32
                                                ====          ====      ====        ====
<FN>
-----------------
<F1>  In March 1987, TMCC guaranteed payments of principal and interest on
      $58 million principal amount of bonds issued in connection with the
      Kentucky manufacturing facility of an affiliate.  As of March 31, 1998,          
      TMCC has not incurred any fixed charges in connection with such guarantee        
      and no amount is included in any ratio of earnings to fixed charges.
</FN>
</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Jeff L. O’Dell,certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-Q of August Technology Corporation;

 

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)              Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)             Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)              Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)              All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b)             Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date: August 3,  2004 | By:                     | /s/ JEFF L. O’DELL |   |
|----------------------------|-------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                       | Jeff L. O’Dell     |
|                       | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Invites Partners to Join the Rural Workforce Innovation Network (RWIN)

WASHINGTON, Jan. 6, 2021 – United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Deputy Under Secretary for 

Rural Development Bette Brand today invited new members to join a national network of public-private 

partners to help create and improve access to jobs in America’s rural towns and communities.

The Rural Workforce Innovation Network (RWIN) was established in 2018 to create a forum for public and 

private partners to help increase access to workforce opportunities across rural America. The network includes

governmental entities, colleges and universities, nonprofit organizations and private businesses actively 

working to improve workforce development in their local communities.

RWIN helps rural leaders:

• Build partnerships;

• Develop tools and resources to meet the needs of rural employers and employees; and

• Share information on emerging trends, best practices and workforce development resources.

To join, interested parties must submit a membership form to USDA. Members may join the network on a 

continuous basis.

USDA also is inviting interested parties to attend a monthly series of public virtual workshops to create 

strategies to support rural workforce development. Workshop topics will focus on addressing workforce 

development needs using Rural Development programs, emerging industry trends, best practices and leveraged 

community resources. 

Interested parties can join the kick-off workshop on Thursday, Jan. 14 at 3 p.m. Eastern Time to discuss the 

improving broadband access to advance rural workforce development. Register to attend at

https://www.eventbrite.com/e/rwin-january-virtual-meeting-broadband-solutions-for-the-rural-workforcetickets-134538304691. 

The registration information for additional workshops is available at www.rd.usda.gov/rwin. For more 

information or questions about RWIN, please contact RD.Innovation.RWIN@usda.gov.

If you’d like to subscribe to USDA Rural Development updates, visit our GovDelivery subscriber page.

###

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender.
§ 590.925 Inspection of egg products offered for entry. ( a ) ( 1 ) Except as provided in §§ 590.960 and 590.965 and paragraph (b) of this section, egg products offered for entry from any foreign country must be reinspected at an official import inspection establishment or official plant by inspection program personnel before they may be allowed entry into the United States.
( 2 ) Every lot of product must routinely be given visual reinspection by inspection program personnel for appearance and condition and be checked for certification and label compliance as provided in §§ 590.915, 590.950, and 590.955.
( 3 ) Inspection program personnel must consult the electronic inspection system for reinspection instructions. The electronic inspection system will assign reinspection levels and procedures based on established sampling plans and established product and plant history.
( b ) Inspection program personnel may take, without cost to the United States, from each consignment of egg product offered for entry, such samples of the products as are deemed necessary to determine the eligibility of the products for entry into commerce of the United States.
Exhibit
32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the annual report of Rapid Link, Incorporated (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
T. McGuane, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
 
 (1) This
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date:
      January 27, 2009
                /s/
      Michael T. McGuaneMichael
      T. McGuane
                  Chief
      Financial Officer
§ 354.100 Payment of fees and charges. ( a ) Fees and charges for any inspection shall be paid by the applicant for the service in accordance with the applicable provisions of §§ 354.100 to 354.110, both inclusive. If so required by the inspector, such fees and charges shall be paid in advance.
( b ) Fees and charges for any inspection service shall, unless otherwise required pursuant to paragraph (c) of this section, be paid by check, draft, or money order payable to the Food Safety and Inspection Service and remitted promptly to the Service.
( c ) Fees and charges for any inspection pursuant to a cooperative agreement with any State or person shall be paid in accordance with the terms of such cooperative agreement.
#### § 354.26 Schedule of operation of official plants.

Inspection operating schedules for services performed pursuant to § 354.107 shall be requested in writing and be approved by the Administrator. Normal operating schedules for a full week consist of a continuous 8-hour period per day (excluding not to exceed 1 hour for lunch), 5 consecutive days per week, within the period of Monday through Saturday, for each shift required. Less than 8-hour schedules may be requested and will be approved if an inspector is available. Sundays may not be approved in any tour of duty. Clock hours of daily operations need not be specified in the request, although as a condition of continued approval, the hours of operation shall be reasonably uniform from day to day. Inspectors are to be notified by management 1 day in advance of any change in the hours inspection service is requested.
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. § 1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Seacoast Financial Services Corporation (the“Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of theundersigned (Kevin G. Champagne, President and CEO), and (Francis S.Mascianica, Jr., Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer as Principal Financialand Accounting Officer), of the Company, certifies, to the best knowledge andbelief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| /s/ Kevin G. Champagne                 |                                                                                   | /s/ Francis S. Mascianica, Jr. |   |
|----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------|--------|
| Kevin G. Champagne                     | Francis S. Mascianica, Jr.                                                             |
| President and Chief  Executive Officer | Treasurer and Chief  Financial Officer, as Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer |
|                                   |                                                                                   |
|                                   |                                                                                   |
| Date:   May 7, 2004               | Date:   May 7, 2004                                                               |

 

1

----
# C_2010246EN.01004301.xml

| 11.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/43

---

Action brought on 9 July 2010 — Verheyden v Commission

(Case F-54/10)

()

2010/C 246/75

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Luc Verheyden (Angera, Italy) (represented by: E. Boigelot, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision rejecting the applicant’s application for the same treatment as that accorded to the applicants in Cases F-5/05 and F-7/05

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the implied decision rejecting the application submitted by the applicant on 16 July 2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the implied decision rejecting the application submitted by the applicant on 16 July 2009;

| — | Annul, in so far as necessary, the express decision of 29 March 2010 rejecting the complaint submitted by the applicant on 28 December 2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul, in so far as necessary, the express decision of 29 March 2010 rejecting the complaint submitted by the applicant on 28 December 2009;

| — | Order the Commission to pay the sum of EUR 3 000 in compensation; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the sum of EUR 3 000 in compensation;

| — | Order the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the European Commission to pay the costs.

---
|   | ___________________________ |
|--------|-----------------------------|

| 1 | Form 25 and attached Notice will be considered compliance with the provisions of 17 CFR 240.19d-1 as applicable.  See General Instructions. |
|---|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
(67 South. 375)

No. 20925.

#### STATE ex rel. COMMERCIAL NAT. BANK v. BOARD OF LIQUIDATION OF STATE DEBT et al.

(Jan. 11, 1915.)

Appeal from Twenty-Second Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge; C. K. Schwing, Judge ad hoc.

Action by the State, on the relation of the Commercial National Bank, against the Board of Liquidation of the State Debt and others. Erom judgment for relator, defendants appeal.

Reversed, alternative writ of mandamus recalled, and injunction dissolved.

Harry P. Gamble, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Gustave Lemle. McCloskey & Benedict, and Howe, *Fenner,*Spencer & Cocke, all of New Orleans, A. Provosty, of New Roads, Laycock & Beale, of Baton Rouge, Ott, Johnson & Ott, of Bogalusa, Bird & Bird, of Baton Rouge, and Hall, Monroe & Lemann, of New Orleans, of counsel), *587for appellant Board of Liquidation of State Debt. Browne, Williamson & Browne, of Shreveport, Thomas M. Burns, of Covington, Chas. A. Holcombe and Taylor & Porter, all of Baton Rouge, and Merrick, Gensler & Schwarz, of New Orleans, for appellee.

SOMMERYILLE, J.

For the reasons given in the case entitled State of Louisiana ex rel. Louisiana Trust & Savings Bank v. Board of Liquidation of the State Debt et al., 67 South. 370, ante, p. 571, No. 20854 on the docket of this court, this day decided—

It is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment appealed from be reversed; that the alternative writ of mandamus issued herein be recalled; and that the injunction be dissolved— all at the cost of relator in both courts.
# C_2010301EN.01006102.xml

| 6.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/61

---

Action brought on 20 September 2010 — Cooperativa Vitivinícola Arousana v OHIM — Constantina Sotelo Ares (ROSALIA DE CASTRO)

(Case T-421/10)

()

2010/C 301/98

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Cooperativa Vitivinícola Arousana, S. Coop. Galega (Meaño, Spain) (represented by: E Sánchez-Quiñones González, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Doña Constantina Sotelo Ares (Cambados, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 July 2010 in Case R 1804/2008-4; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 July 2010 in Case R 1804/2008-4;

| — | order that trade mark 5635867 ROSALIA DE CASTRO be granted in respect of Classes 32, 33 and 35; |
| --- | --- |

—

order that trade mark 5635867 ROSALIA DE CASTRO be granted in respect of Classes 32, 33 and 35;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs, annulling the costs which the applicant was ordered to pay in the appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs, annulling the costs which the applicant was ordered to pay in the appeal.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Cooperativa Vitivínicola Arousana, S. Coop. Galega.

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘ROSALIA DE CASTRO’ for goods and services in Classes 32, 33 and 35.

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Doña Constantina Sotelo Ares.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Spanish word mark ‘ROSALIA’ for goods and services in Class 33.

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition rejected.

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal allowed and opposition upheld.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, (1) since there is no likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

1

---
-  Home 
-  About 
-  Civil Rights 

# In This Section

                      -  Employee Services                          -  Overview 
                        -  Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) 
                        -  Minority Serving Institutions Program 
                        -  No FEAR Act 
                        -  Special Emphasis Programs 
                      -  Public Services                          -  Overview 
                        -  Small Business Utilization in Federal Projects 
                        -  Environmental Justice 
                        -  Limited English Proficiency 
                      -  Grant Recipient Information 
                      -  PHMSA Office of Civil Rights 

# EO 12898

EO 12898 Env Justice.pdf (41.14 KB)

*DOT is committed to ensuring that information is available in appropriate alternative formats to meet the requirements of persons who have a disability. If you require an alternative version of files provided on this page, please contact          PHMSA-Accessibility@dot.gov.*
FORM RD 2006-46 (Rev. 01-98)

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE MANUAL ISSUE No.

RURAL DEVELOPMENT WSAL PN 577

Washington, D.C 20250 DATE

February 24, 2023

PROCEDURE NOTICE

RD HANDBOOK CHANGES

INSERT RD HB-1-3560 MFH LOAN ORIGINATION HANDBOOK. This 

(WSAL) Handbook is partially revised. Specific 

revisions include: 

Chapter 1:

Paragraph 1.6 A. is updated to provide clarification regarding the Off-Farm Labor 

Housing grant term and period of performance to align with 7 CFR 3560.566 and 

comply with Federal award requirements outlined in 2 CFR 200.211.

Chapter 5:

Paragraphs 5.15 and 5.18 is revised to align with approval and obligation 

procedures of the current organizational structure of MFH.

REMOVE INSERT

Table of Contents: Table of Contents:

 Pages 9 & 10; Pages 9 & 10 revised;

Chapter 1 dated 03-09-16: Chapter 1 dated 03-09-16:

 Pages 1-5 & 1-6; Pages 1-5 & 1-6 revised;

Chapter 5 dated 03-09-16: Chapter 5 dated 03-09-16:

 Pages 5-19 thru 5-24. Pages 5-19 thru 5-24 revised 02-24-23.

oOo

READ PROCEDURE - DISCUSS IN STAFF CONFERENCE - KEEP PROCEDURE MANUAL UP TO DATE
Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report  of Sunburst Acquisitions VI, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form  10-QSB for the period ending October 31, 2005  (the
"Report"), I,  Michael R. Quinn, Principal Executive Officer  and  Principal
Financial  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to  18  U.S.C.  Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of  2002,
that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the  Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.



/s/ Michael R. Quinn

-----------------------
Principal Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer
Date: August 3, 2007
1040.976
### **CHAPTER 20—REGULATION OF INSURANCE**

Sec.
1011.
Declaration of policy.
1012.
Regulation by State law; Federal law relating specifically to insurance; applicability of certain Federal laws after June 30, 1948.
1013.
Suspension until June 30, 1948, of application of certain Federal laws; Sherman Act applicable to agreements to, or acts of, boycott, coercion, or intimidation.
1014.
Effect on other laws.
1015.
"State" defined.