alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements, as
amended, of Financial Security Assurance Holdings Ltd. on Form S-8 (File No.
33-78784) (1993 Equity Participation Plan), Form S-8 (File No. 33-92648)
(Deferred Compensation Plan), Form S-3 (File No. 33-80769) (in connection with
USW DECS and Forward Shares), Form S-3 (File No. 333-34181) (Debt Securities and
Common Stock) and Form S-3 (File No. 333-74165) (Debt Securities, Common Stock
and Stock Purchase Contracts) of:

      1.    Our report dated January 26, 1999 on our audits of the consolidated
            balance sheets of Financial Security Assurance Holdings Ltd. and
            Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the related
            consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders' equity
            and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
            December 31, 1998, which report is incorporated by reference in this
            Annual Report on form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
            1998;

      2.    Our report dated January 26, 1999 on our audit of the financial
            statement schedule relating to the consolidated financial statements
            of Financial Security Assurance Holdings Ltd. and Subsidiaries,
            which report is included in this Annual Report on form 10-K for the
            fiscal year ended December 31, 1998; and

      3.    Our report dated January 26, 1999 on our audits of the consolidated
            balance sheets of Financial Security Assurance Inc. and Subsidiaries
            as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the related consolidated
            statements of income, changes in shareholder's equity and cash flows
            for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1998,
            which report is included in exhibit 99 to this Annual Report on form
            10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998.


                                    /s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
                                    ------------------------------
                                       PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

New York, New York
March  23, 1999
###### Editorial Note on Part 113

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 113 appear at 79 FR 55969, Sept. 18, 2014.

#### §§ 113.213-113.214 [Reserved]
j I 

1 

SERVED: October 8, 2014 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

RIDAN INVESTMENTS, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA 2013- 1082 

AMENDED PROCEDURAL ORDER 

We do not anticipate reaching this case prior to January 2015. 

Unless specifically changed herein all prior orders remain in effect. 

WHEREFORE, the parties be and are hereby ORDERED to adhere to the 

following procedural schedule: 

1. On or before January 9, 2015, the parties shall conclude all discovery including, 

but not limited to, depositions, document production, responses to production 

requests and/or interrogatories. If the parties cannot resolve a discovery dispute 

they shall submit the dispute to the undersigned for resolution in a timely manner; 

2. The parties shall be prepared to present this case at a hearing on or after January 

9, 2015, subject to the availability of courtroom facilities. The specific date and 

time for the hearing will be forthcoming in a separate Order. 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment- Service List 
SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

President 

Ridan Investments, Respondent 

18540 Minthorn Street 

Lake Elsinore, CA 92530 

TEL: NOT PROVIDED 

FAX: NOT PROVIDED 

ONE COPY 

Lawrence M. Burek, Respondent's Counsel 

550 North Parkcenter Drive, Suite 204 

Santa Ana, CA 92705 

TEL: 714-564-9033 

FAX: NOT PROVIDED 

Tammy Leach 

P.O. Box 891324 

Temecula, CA 92589 

TEL: 951-970-6762 

FAX: NOT PROVIDED 

Courtney Adolph, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel, Western-Pacific Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 92007 

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

TEL: 310-725-7128 

FAX: 310-725-6816 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS No. FAA-2013-1082 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1208

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that reimbursements

for costs of using passenger automobiles for charitable and other organizations are excluded from gross income.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 10, 1999

Mr. MURKOWSKI introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

that reimbursements for costs of using passenger automobiles for charitable and other organizations are excluded from gross income.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENTS TO CHARITABLE

4 VOLUNTEERS EXCLUDED FROM GROSS IN5 COME.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Part III of subchapter B of chap7 ter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended
2

•S 1208 IS

1 by redesignating section 139 as section 140 and by insert2 ing after section 138 the following new section:

3 ‘‘SEC. 139. MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENTS TO CHARITABLE

4 VOLUNTEERS.

5 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Gross income of an individual

6 does not include amounts received, from an organization

7 described in section 170(c), as reimbursement of operating

8 expenses with respect to use of a passenger automobile

9 for the benefit of such organization. The preceding sen10 tence shall apply only to the extent that such reimburse11 ment would be deductible under this chapter if section

12 274(d) were applied—

13 ‘‘(1) by using the standard business mileage

14 rate established under such section, and

15 ‘‘(2) as if the individual were an employee of an

16 organization not described in section 170(c).

17 ‘‘(b) NO DOUBLE BENEFIT.—Subsection (a) shall

18 not apply with respect to any expenses if the individual

19 claims a deduction or credit for such expenses under any

20 other provision of this title.

21 ‘‘(c) EXEMPTION FROM REPORTING REQUIRE22 MENTS.—Section 6041 shall not apply with respect to re23 imbursements excluded from income under subsection

24 (a).’’
3

•S 1208 IS

1 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

2 for part III of subchapter B of chapter 1 of such Code

3 is amended by striking the item relating to section 139

4 and inserting the following new items:

‘‘Sec. 139. Reimbursement for use of passenger automobile for

charity.

‘‘Sec. 140. Cross reference to other Acts.’’

5 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

6 this section shall apply to taxable years ending after the

7 date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
§ 1001.4 Categories of exemptions. ( a ) The FOIA does not require disclosure of matters that are: ( 1 ) Specifically authorized under criteria established by an executive order to be kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign policy and are, in fact, properly classified under executive order;
( 2 ) Related solely to the internal personnel rules and practices of the Board;
( 3 ) Specifically exempted from disclosure by statute (other than the Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b, as amended), provided that such statute: ( i ) Requires that the matters be withheld from the public in such a manner as to leave no discretion on the issue, establishes particular criteria for withholding, or refers to particular types of matters to be withheld; and
( ii ) If enacted after October 28, 2009, specifically cites to Exemption 3 of the FOIA, 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(3);
( 4 ) Trade secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from a person and privileged or confidential;
( 5 ) Inter-agency or intra-agency memoranda or letters, which would not be available at law to a party other than an agency in litigation with the Board;
( 6 ) Personnel and medical files and similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy;
( 7 ) Records or information compiled for law enforcement purposes, but only to the extent that the production of such law enforcement records or information: ( i ) Could reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings;
( ii ) Would deprive a person of a right to a fair trial or impartial adjudication;
( iii ) Could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy;
( iv ) Could reasonably be expected to disclose the identity of a confidential source, including a state, local, or foreign agency or authority or any private institution that furnished information on a confidential basis, and, in the case of a record or information compiled by a criminal investigation, or by an agency conducting a lawful national security intelligence investigation, information furnished by a confidential source;
( v ) Would disclose techniques and procedures for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions or would disclose guidelines for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions if such disclosure could reasonably be expected to risk circumvention of the law; or
( vi ) Could reasonably be expected to endanger the life or physical safety of any individual.
( 8 ) Contained in or related to examination, operating, or condition reports prepared by, on behalf of, or for the use of an agency responsible for the regulation or supervision of financial institutions; or
( 9 ) Geological and geophysical information and data, including maps, concerning wells.
( b ) [Reserved]
§ 354.242 Cleaning of equipment and utensils. Equipment and utensils used for preparing or otherwise handling any product shall be kept clean and in a sanitary condition and in good repair. ( a ) Pens shall be cleaned regularly and the manure removed from the plant daily.
( b ) All equipment and utensils used in the killing and skinning rooms shall be thoroughly washed and cleaned after each day's operation. The eviscerating, chilling, and packing room and equipment and utensils used therein shall be maintained in a clean and sanitary condition.
( c ) Graders' and packers' gloves and grading bins shall be washed daily and used only for grading or packing, as the case may be.
( d ) All crates or pens used for transporting live rabbits to the plant shall be cleaned regularly.
( e ) Chilling vats or tanks, if practicable, shall be emptied after each use. They shall be thoroughly cleaned once daily and, after each cleaning operation, they shall be sanitized with such compounds or by such methods as may be approved or prescribed by the Administrator.
( f ) When synchronized overhead conveyors and tray conveyors are used, the trays shall be completely washed and sanitized after being automatically emptied of inedible viscera.
( g ) When a conveyor tray operation is used, each carcass shall be eviscerated in an individual metal tray of seamless construction, and such trays shall be completely washed and sanitized after each use.
( h ) Tables, shelves, bins, trays, pans, knives, and all other tools and equipment used in the preparation of ready-to-cook rabbits shall be kept clean and sanitary at all times. Cleaned equipment and utensils shall be drained on racks and shall not be nested.
( i ) Drums, cans, tanks, vats, and other receptacles used to hold or transport ready-to-cook rabbits shall be kept in a clean and sanitary condition.
# C_2010221EN.01002701.xml

| 14.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/27

---

Action brought on 9 June 2010 — European Commission v Portuguese Republic

(Case C-286/10)

()

2010/C 221/43

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: P. Guerra e Andrade and M. van Beek, Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Portuguese Republic

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, by failing to bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2005/47/EC (1) of 18 July 2005 on the Agreement between the Community of European Railways (CER) and the European Transport Workers’ Federation (ETF) on certain aspects of the working conditions of mobile workers engaged in interoperable cross-border services in the railway sector and, in any event, by failing to communicate such measures to the Commission, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 5 of the Directive. |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by failing to bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2005/47/EC (1) of 18 July 2005 on the Agreement between the Community of European Railways (CER) and the European Transport Workers’ Federation (ETF) on certain aspects of the working conditions of mobile workers engaged in interoperable cross-border services in the railway sector and, in any event, by failing to communicate such measures to the Commission, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 5 of the Directive.

1

| — | Order the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for transposing the directive expired on 26 July 2008.

---

(1)  OJ 2005 L 195, p. 15.

1

---
#### § 354.23 Identification.

Each inspector shall have in his possession at all times, and present upon request while on duty, the means of identification furnished by the Department to such person.
#### § 3.65 Terminal facilities.

No person subject to the Animal Welfare regulations shall commingle shipments of live rabbits with inanimate cargo. All animal holding areas of a terminal facility where shipments of rabbits are maintained shall be cleaned and sanitized as prescribed in § 3.56 of the standards often enough to prevent an accumulation of debris or excreta, to minimize vermin infestation, and to prevent a disease hazard. An effective program for the control of insects, ectoparasites, and avian and mammalian pests shall be established and maintained for all animal holding areas. Any animal holding area containing live rabbits shall be provided with fresh air by means of windows, doors, vents, or air conditioning and may be ventilated or air circulated by means of fans, blowers, or an air conditioning system so as to minimize drafts, odors, and moisture condensation. Auxiliary ventilation, such as exhaust fans and vents or fans or blowers or air conditioning shall be used for any animal holding area containing live rabbits when the air temperature within such animal holding area is 23.9 °C. (75 °F.) or higher. The air temperature around any live rabbit in any animal holding area shall not be allowed to fall below 7.2 °C. (45 °F.) nor be allowed to exceed 29.5 °C. (85 °F.) at any time. To ascertain compliance with the provisions of this paragraph, the air temperature around any live rabbit shall be measured and read outside the primary enclosure which contains such rabbit at a distance not to exceed .91 meters (3 feet) from any one of the external walls of the primary enclosure and on a level parallel to the bottom of such primary enclosure at a point which approximates half the distance between the top and bottom of such primary enclosure.

[43 FR 56216, Dec. 1, 1978, as amended at 55 FR 28883, July 16, 1990]]
#### § 381.122 Identification of manufacturer, packer or distributor.

The name and address, including zip code, of the manufacturer, packer, or distributor shall be shown on the label and if only the name and address of the distributor is shown, it shall be qualified by such term as “packed for,” “distributed by,” or “distributors.” The name and place of business of the manufacturer, packer, or distributor may be shown on the principal display panel, on the 20-percent panel of the principal display panel reserved for required information, on the front riser panel of frozen food cartons, or on the information panel.

[37 FR 9706, May 16, 1972, as amended at 59 FR 40215, Aug. 8, 1994]
Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

BILL OF COSTS

No. 01-14-00999-CV

Sahami Investments, Ltd 

v.

Stately Homes, LLC, Theodore More and Bryan Phillips

NO. 2014-12172 IN THE 113TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID/DUE STATUS PAID BY

MT FEE

MT FEE

MT FEE

MT FEE

CLK RECORD

STATEWIDE EFILING

FILING

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$101.00

$20.00

$175.00

04/07/2015

03/11/2015

03/04/2015

02/19/2015

01/24/2015

12/22/2014

12/22/2014

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

UNKNOWN

PAID

PAID

APE

ANT

APE

APE

ANT

ANT

ANT

The costs incurred on appeal to the First Court of Appeals Houston, Texas are 

$336.00.

Court costs in this case have been taxed in this Court’s judgment

I, Christopher A. Prine, Clerk of the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas, do hereby 

certify that this is a true statement of the costs of appeal in this case.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my 

hand and the seal of the Court of Appeals for the 

First District of Texas, this July 17, 2015.
#### § 6.149 Program accessibility: Discrimination prohibited.

Except as otherwise provided in 11 CFR 6.150 and 11 CFR 6.151, no qualified handicapped person shall be denied the benefits of, be excluded from participation in, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity conducted by the Commission because its facilities are inaccessible to or unusable by handicapped persons.
§ 390.7 Appeals. ( a ) If the request for information or for a waiver of search or duplication is denied, in whole or in part, the FOIA Coordinator or designee will explain in the letter of response the grounds for any denial of access and offer the requester an opportunity to file an administrative appeal, pursuant to 7 CFR 1.3(a)(4). The appeal should be filed in writing within 45 days of the date of denial (departmental regulations, 7 CFR 1.14) and addressed as follows: Administrator, Food Safety and Inspection Service (FOIA Appeals), Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC 20250-3700
( b ) The FSIS Administrator is authorized under 7 CFR 1.3(a)(4) to extend the 20-day deadline, make discretionary releases, and make determinations regarding the charging of fees.
#### In the Matter of Proving the Alleged Last Will and Testament of Robert B. Reilly, Deceased, as a Will of Real and Personal Property. Peter W. Reilly *922and Others, Appellants; Abbie A. Reilly, Respondent.

Order affirmed; With ten dollars costs and disbursements.. No opinion.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The certificationset forth below is being submitted in connection with this Annual Report onForm 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”)for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) orRule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “ExchangeAct”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United StatesCode.

Stephen P.A. Fodor, Ph.D., the Founder, Chairman andChief Executive Officer of Affymetrix, Inc. certifies that, to the best ofsuch officer’s knowledge:

1.                 theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

2.                 theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Affymetrix, Inc.
| August 30, 2006 | /s/ STEPHEN P.A. FODOR, Ph.D. |
|-----------------|-------------------------------|
|            | Name:                         | Stephen P.A.  Fodor, Ph.D. |
|            | Title:                        | *Founder,  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer* |

 

 

----
### §1225. State laws as affected

This chapter shall not invalidate any provision of the laws of any State except insofar as there is a direct conflict between an express provision of this chapter and an express provision of State law which can not 1 be reconciled.

(Aug. 8, 1956, ch. 1038, §5, 70 Stat. 1126.)

1 So in original. Probably should be "cannot".
# C_2010179EN.01005901.xml

| 3.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/59

---

Action brought on 11 May 2010 — Lorenzo v EESC

(Case F-29/10)

(2010/C 179/103)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Guillermo Lorenzo (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: N. Lhoëst, lawyer)

Defendant: European Economic and Social Committee

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision not to include the applicant among the officials promoted to grade AD13 under the 2009 promotion procedure.

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | Annul the decision of the EESC appointing authority, adopted and published on 30 June 2009, not to include the applicant’s name on the list of officials promoted to grade AD 13 under the 2009 promotion procedure; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the EESC appointing authority, adopted and published on 30 June 2009, not to include the applicant’s name on the list of officials promoted to grade AD 13 under the 2009 promotion procedure;

| — | So far as necessary, annul the EESC appointing authority’s decision of 5 February 2010 rejecting the complaint brought by the applicant under Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations; |
| --- | --- |

—

So far as necessary, annul the EESC appointing authority’s decision of 5 February 2010 rejecting the complaint brought by the applicant under Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

---
§ 392.8 Expedited review. ( a ) A petition will receive expedited review by FSIS if the requested action is intended to enhance the public health by removing or reducing foodborne pathogens or other potential food safety hazards that might be present in or on meat, poultry, or egg products.
( b ) For a petition to be considered for expedited review, the petitioner must submit scientific information that demonstrates that the requested action will reduce or remove foodborne pathogens or other potential food safety hazards that are likely to be present in or on meat, poultry, or egg products, and how it will do so.
( c ) If FSIS determines that a petition warrants expedited review, FSIS will review the petition ahead of other pending petitions.