alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Announces the Availability of Funding for Multi-Family Housing Loan Guarantees

(March 14, 2016) – USDA Under Secretary Lisa Mensah today announced that the Rural Housing Service 

(RHS) is soliciting applications for loan guarantees to construct or improve affordable rural rental housing 

communities. The funds are being provided through the Rural Rental Housing Loan Guarantee Program. 

These loan guarantees will increase the number of affordable rental homes for very-low-income rural 

Americans. RHS has published amount of funding available for FY 2016 on its Web site: 

http://www.rd.usda.gov/programs-services/multi-family-housing-loan-guarantees

Applications are accepted on a rolling basis through December 31, 2017. 

To apply, contact the Rural Development (RD) State Office in which the proposed project is located. A list of 

these offices is available at: http://www.rd.usda.gov/contact-us/state-offices

For additional details, see page 13311 of the March 14, 2016 Federal Register.

#

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender. To file a complaint of discrimination, write: 

USDA, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, Office of Adjudication, 1400 Independence Ave., SW, 

Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (866) 632-9992 (Toll-free Customer Service), (800) 877-8339 (Local or 

Federal relay), (866) 377-8642 (Relay voice users).
### §1266. Hearing before report of criminal violation

Before any violation of this chapter is reported by the Commission to any United States attorney for institution of a criminal proceeding, the person against whom such proceeding is contemplated shall be given appropriate notice and an opportunity to present his views, either orally or in writing, with regard to such contemplated proceeding.

(Pub. L. 86–613, §7, July 12, 1960, 74 Stat. 377; Pub. L. 110–314, title II, §204(b)(4)(B), Aug. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 3041.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2008—Pub. L. 110–314 substituted "Commission" for "Secretary".
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Bray, Annunziata and Overton

SONJA LYNN WILLIAMS MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 2113-96-2 PER CURIAM DECEMBER 10, 1996 BURGER KING AND TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Sonja L. Williams, pro se , on brief). (William Orr Smith, on brief), for appellees.

Sonja Lynn Williams ("claimant") contends that the Workers' Compensation Commission ("commission") erred in finding that she failed to prove she sustained disability causally related to her March 17, 1987 compensable industrial accident. Upon reviewing the record and the briefs of the parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the commission's decision. Rule 5A:27. On appeal, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the prevailing party below. R.G. Moore Bldg. Corp. v. Mullins , 10 Va. App. 211, 212, 390 S.E.2d 788, 788 (1990). Unless we can say as a matter of law that claimant proved disability related to the March 17, 1987 accident, the commission's findings are binding and conclusive upon us. Tomko v. Michael's Plastering Co. , 210 Va. 697, 699, 173 S.E.2d 833,

* Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication.2 835 (1970). Dr. Michael Decker's February 18, 1988 report, stating that claimant's costochondritis was unrelated to the burns she sustained at work, constituted the only medical evidence before the commission. Because no medical evidence established that claimant suffered from any disability causally related to her compensable accident, we cannot say as a matter of law that claimant's evidence sustained her burden of proof. Therefore, we affirm the commission's decision. Affirmed.
from those raised in his previous petitions. 3 See NRS 34.810(1)(b)(2); NRS 

34.810(2). Appellant's petition was procedurally barred absent a 

demonstration of good cause and actual prejudice. See NRS 34.726(1); 

NRS 34.810(1)(b); NRS 34.810(3). Moreover, because the State specifically 

pleaded laches, appellant was required to overcome the rebuttable 

presumption of prejudice. NRS 34.800(2). Based upon our review of the 

record on appeal, we conclude that the district court did not err in denying 

the petition as procedurally barred for the reasons discussed below. 

In an attempt to overcome the procedural bars, appellant 

claimed that he had new evidence, not presented to the jury, that 

demonstrated that he was actually innocent. Appellant claimed, based 

on an article in the Las Vegas Review Journal, that the DNA evidence 

used at his trial may have been tainted because a DNA technician made 

an error in another case. Appellant did not demonstrate actual innocence 

because he failed to show that "it is more likely than not that no 

reasonable juror would have convicted him in light of. . . new evidence." 

Calderon v. Thompson, 523 U.S. 538, 559 (1998) (quoting Schlup v. Delo, 

513 U.S. 298, 327 (1995)); see also Pellegrini v. State, 117 Nev. 860, 887, 34 

P.3d 519, 537 (2001); Mazzan v. Warden, 112 Nev. 838, 842, 921 P.2d 920, 

922 (1996). 

Appellant also claimed that he was actually innocent because 

a witness recanted his testimony. This court has previously rejected this 

3Singer v State, Docket No. 23916 (Order Dismissing Appeal, July 

28, 1995); Singer v. State, Docket Nos. 29029, 29547, 29910 (Order 

Dismissing Appeals and Denying Petition for Rehearing or Clarification, 

February 24, 1998); Singer v. State, Docket No. 38561 (Order of 

Affirmance, June 27, 2002); Singer v. State, Docket No. 47725 (Order of 

Affirmance, December 21, 2006). 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 024:7_ 1

2 
claim, Singer v State, Docket No. 23916 (Order Dismissing Appeal, July 

28, 1995); Singer v. State, Docket Nos. 29029, 29547, 29910 (Order 

Dismissing Appeals and Denying Petition for Rehearing or Clarification, 

February 24, 1998); Singer v. State, Docket No. 38561 (Order of 

Affirmance, June 27, 2002), and further litigation of this claim is barred 

by the doctrine of law of the case. Hall v. State, 91 Nev. 314, 315-16, 535 

P.2d 797, 798-99 (1975). We therefore conclude that the district court did 

not err in denying appellant's petition as procedurally barred, and we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 4 

J. 

Hardesty 

cc: Hon. James M. Bixler, District Judge 

Maury A. Singer 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

4We have reviewed all documents that appellant has submitted in 

proper person to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude 

that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent 

that appellant has attempted to present claims or facts in those 

submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings 

below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance. 

3
### §15h. Applicability of parens patriae actions

Sections 15c, 15d, 15e, 15f, and 15g of this title shall apply in any State, unless such State provides by law for its nonapplicability in such State.

(Oct. 15, 1914, ch. 323, §4H, as added Pub. L. 94–435, title III, §301, Sept. 30, 1976, 90 Stat. 1396.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Injuries sustained prior to Sept. 30, 1976, not covered by this section, see section 304 of Pub. L. 94–435, set out as a note under section 15c of this title.
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Rural Development Announces Gil Gonzalez as Chief of Staff

WASHINGTON, Jan. 18, 2018 – Assistant to the Secretary for Rural Development Anne Hazlett today 

announced the appointment of Gil Gonzalez as Chief of Staff.

Gonzalez has more than 30 years of executive experience in community economic development. Most recently, 

he served as a senior consultant with the Rural Empowerment Advancement Program – an organization 

working with rural businesses, communities and economic development corporations in Texas.

Gonzalez also was Director of the Rural Business Program at the University of Texas-San Antonio, a program 

that provides research and strategic planning services, as well as business and resource development assistance 

to small- to medium-sized businesses, economic development corporations, communities and municipalities.

Prior to that, Gonzalez served as Deputy Under Secretary/Acting Under Secretary for Rural Development from

2001 to 2005. Afterward, he coordinated disaster response, recovery and long-term rebuilding efforts from 

Hurricanes Katrina and Rita on the Louisiana and Mississippi Gulf Coast.

This leadership appointment is effective Jan. 22, 2018. USDA Rural Development encourages partners and 

stakeholder groups to reach out to Gonzalez in his new role to build on existing partnerships and facilitate new 

relationships.

#

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**
**CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
     This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements ofSection 1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and CriminalProcedures) of the United States Code and shall not be relied on by any personfor any other purpose.
     The undersigned, who is the Chief Executive Officer of S1 Corporation (the“Company”), hereby certifies as follows:
     To the knowledge of the undersigned, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofthe Company (the “Report”), which accompanies this Certificate, fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, and all information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.
     Dated this 14th day of November 2003.
 /s/ Jaime W. Ellertson
RMA Volatility Factor Calculation Methodology

RMA uses a measure of price volatility based on the Black-Scholes Model. This model provides a formula that 

translates options prices (the amount the market charges to ‘lock-in’ a future price) into an implied volatility of 

the price of the commodity. This price volatility is used in the calculation of RMA’s premium rates for revenue 

coverage. The result is that the premium rate RMA charges to lock-in a future (harvest time) price through 

crop insurance is equivalent to what the market charges to lock in a price through an options contract.

Implied volatility, being a common market measure, is provided by a number of financial reporting services. 

RMA utilizes the services of barchart.com as its source for market data. For this calculation, RMA downloads 

the appropriate closing implied volatility for the contract, for the day, as defined in the Commodity Exchange 

Price Provisions (CEPP) of the Common Crop Insurance Policy Basic Provisions. The implied volatility is then 

adjusted to take into account the time difference between the expiration of the options contract and the time 

period RMA uses to establish the harvest price. The RMA Volatility Factor for a given crop is based on the 

average of the time-adjusted volatility factors for the last 5 days of the projected pricing period.

STEPS USED BY RMA TO ESTABLISH THE VOLATILITY FACTOR

Determine the Projected Price and Harvest Price monitoring periods from the CEPP.

For each of the last 5 days of the Projected Price discovery period:

Determine the number of days from that date until the 16th day of the Harvest Price discovery period, 

and divide that number by 365 (366 for leap years, as applicable);

Take the square root of that quotient;

Multiply by the implied volatility for the contract for the day; and

Determine the simple average of the last five RMA calculated volatility factors for the projected pricing period, 

rounded to 2 decimals.

EXAMPLE: Iowa corn

-Futures contract is CZ15 (December 2015 corn)

-Projected Price monitoring period is February 1-28, 2015

-Harvest Price monitoring period is October 1-31, 2015

SO for example, for 2/23/2015, the logic is as follows:

.20301=(((DATE(2015,10,16)-DATE(2015,2,23))/365)^0.5)*.253

RMA calculated

Contract Date Implied Volatility volatility factor

CZ15 2/23/2015 .253 .20301

CZ15 2/24/2015 .255 .20417

CZ15 2/25/2015 .254 .20294

CZ15 2/26/2015 .260 .20729

CZ15 2/27/2015 .261 .20763

Simple average of the 5 RMA calculated volatility factors, rounded to 2 decimals = .21
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1418 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1418

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To provide for the holding of court at Natchez, Mississippi, in the 
 same manner as court is held at Vicksburg, Mississippi, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HOLDING OF COURT AT NATCHEZ, MISSISSIPPI.

    Section 104(b)(3) of title 28, United States Code, is amended in 
the second sentence by striking all beginning with the colon through 
``United States''.

            Passed the Senate November 5, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1418

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To provide for the holding of court at Natchez, Mississippi, in the 
 same manner as court is held at Vicksburg, Mississippi, and for other 
                               purposes.
```
§ 381.215 Poultry or other articles subject to judicial seizure and condemnation. Any poultry carcass, or part thereof, or any product made wholly or in part from any poultry carcass or part thereof; except those exempted from the definition of a poultry product in § 381.15, or any dead, dying, disabled, or diseased poultry, that is being transported in commerce or is otherwise subject to the Act, or is held for sale in the United States after such transportation, is subject to seizure and condemnation, in a judicial proceeding pursuant to section 20 of the Act if such poultry or other article: ( a ) Is or has been processed, sold, transported, or otherwise distributed or offered or received for distribution in violation of the Act; or
( b ) Is capable of use as human food and is adulterated or misbranded; or
( c ) In any other way is in violation of the Act.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           5,204
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,267
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       1,030,689
<DEPRECIATION>                                 143,610
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 955,579
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        683,016
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           266
<OTHER-SE>                                     227,288
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   955,579
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               144,887
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   43,008
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,089<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              54,649
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 33,141
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (6,483)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    26,657
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.04
<FN>
<F1>Includes depreciation and amortization of $21,217, $4,786 allocated to minority
interests, $8,440 in G&A costs and $23,991 gain on sale of assets.
</FN>


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>      5


<S>                                          <C>                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       3-MOS                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             MAY-31-2000           MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                DEC-01-1999           JUN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  FEB-29-2000           FEB-29-2000
<CASH>                                          4,125,511                     0
<SECURITIES>                                            0                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   6,699,791             6,699,791
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0                     0
<INVENTORY>                                     3,023,199             3,023,199
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               13,988,032            13,988,032
<PP&E>                                            523,815               523,815
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 15,008,670            15,008,670
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           3,189,145             3,189,145
<BONDS>                                                 0                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0                     0
<PREFERRED>                                             0                     0
<COMMON>                                        7,342,163             7,342,163
<OTHER-SE>                                      4,477,361             4,477,361
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   15,008,670            15,008,670
<SALES>                                         7,175,725            36,123,846
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                7,175,725            36,123,846
<CGS>                                           5,884,869            30,001,929
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   6,810,314            33,538,401
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      0                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   365,411             2,675,445
<INCOME-TAX>                                      152,827             1,201,144
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               212,584             1,474,301
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0                     0
<CHANGES>                                               0                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                      212,584             1,474,301
<EPS-BASIC>                                           .04                   .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         .04                   .27



</TABLE>
§ 381.119 Declaration of artificial flavoring or coloring. ( a ) When an artificial smoke flavoring or a smoke flavoring is added as an ingredient in the formula of any poultry product, there shall appear on the label, in prominent letters and contiguous to the name of the product, a statement such as “Artificial Smoke Flavoring Added” or “Smoke Flavoring Added,” as applicable, and the ingredient statement shall identify any artificial smoke flavoring or smoke flavoring added as an ingredient in the formula of the poultry product.
( b ) Any poultry product which bears or contains any artificial flavoring other than an artificial smoke flavoring or a smoke flavoring, or bears or contains any artificial coloring shall bear a statement stating that fact on the immediate container or, if there is none, on the product.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-2000
<CASH>                                               7,655
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        5,829
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    13,736
<PP&E>                                             478,308
<DEPRECIATION>                                      42,127
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     458,904
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              135,737
<BONDS>                                            102,546
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                         37,500
<COMMON>                                               182
<OTHER-SE>                                         182,246
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       458,904
<SALES>                                             72,945
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    74,769
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       46,051
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  11,445
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     20,237
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 20,237
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        17,447
<EPS-BASIC>                                         1.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         1.05



</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                  In connection with the Annual Report of National Dentex
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2002
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Richard F. Becker, Jr., Chief Financial Officer, Vice President of
Finance and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

By:/s/ Richard F. Becker, Jr.
   --------------------------
Richard F. Becker, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer, Vice President of Finance and Treasurer
March 10, 2003