### November **21 , 2014** 



# High School Longi **tudinal Study of 2009 (HSLS:09)**  **Second Follow** **- up**  **Field Test and Main Study Panel** 

**Maintenance 2015**  **Supporting Statement**

**Part A**

**Request for OMB Review**  **OMB# 1850 -**  **0852 v. 15** 

**National Center for Education Statistics**

**U.S. Department of Education**i 

### TABLE OF CONTENTS **Section Page**  A. Justification ................................ ................................ ................................ ......................... 1 A.1 Circumstances Necessitating Collection of Information ................................ .......... 1 A.1.a Purpose of This Submission ................................ ................................ ...... 1 A.1.b Legislative Authorization ................................ ................................ .......... 3 A.1.c Prior and Related Studies ................................ ................................ .......... 3 A.2 Purpose and Use of Information Collection ................................ ............................. 4 A.2.a Content Justifications ................................ ................................ ................ 7 A.3 Use of Improved Information Technology ................................ ............................. 13 A.3.a Postsecondary

Transcripts: HSL S:09 PETS ................................ ................ 14 A.3.b. Financial Aid Records Collection: HSL S:09 FAR ................................ ..... 14 A.4 Efforts to Identify

Duplication and Use of Similar Information ............................ 15 A.5 Impact on Small Businesses or Other Small Entities ................................ ............. 16 A.6 Consequences of Collecting the In formation Less Frequently .............................. 17 A.7 Special Circumstances Relating to Guidelines of 5 CFR 1320.5 ........................... 18 A.8 Consultations Outside NCES ................................ ................................ ................. 18 A.9 Provision of Pay

ment or Gift to Respondents ................................ ........................ 18 A.10 Assurance of Confidentiality Provided to Respondents ................................ ......... 19 A.11 Justification for Sensitive Questions ................................ ................................ ...... 23 A.12 Estimates of Annualized Burden Hours and Their Cost to Respondents ............... 23 A.13 Estimates of Total Annual Cost Burden to Respondents ................................ ....... 24 A.14 Annualized Cost to the Federal Government ................................ ......................... 2 5 A.15 Reasons for Program Changes ................................ ................................ ............... 25 A.16 Publication Plans and Project Schedule ................................ ................................ . 26 A.17 Reason(s) Display

of OMB Expiration Date Is Inappropriate ............................... 27 A.18 Exceptions to Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Statement .................... 27 

### EXHIBITS **Number Page**  Exhibit A - 1. HSL S:09 Data Collection Components, by wave of data collection ........................ 2 Exhibit A - 2. Longitudinal design for the HSL S:09 ninth - grade cohort: 2009

–25 ....................... 17 Exhibit A - 3. Estimated Burd en for HSL S:09 Second Follow - up ................................ .................. 24 Exhibit A - 4a. Total Costs to NCES ................................ ................................ ............................... 25 Exhibit A - 4b. Total Contract Costs ................................ ................................ ................................ 25 Exhibit A - 5. Operational Schedule for HSL S:09 Second Follow - up Field Test ......................... 26ii 

### ATTACHMENTS Appendix A HSL S:09 Technical Review Panel (TRP) Contact Information Appendix B Confidentiality for Administrative Record Matching Appendix C Data Security Language for Vendor Contracts Appendix D Respondent Communication Materials Appendix E Facsimiles for the HSL S:09 Second Follow - up Interview , Reinterview , and

Abbreviated Interview Appendix F Transcript Data Request Contacting Materials and Data Elements Appendix G Student Records Request Contacting Materials and Data ElementsSupporting Statement Request for OMB Review (SF83I) A. Justification

1 **A. JUSTIFICATION**  **A.1 Circumstances Necessitating Collection of Information**  **A.1.a Purpose of This Submission**  The High School L ongitudinal Study of 2009 (HSL S:09) is conducted b y the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), part of the Institute of Education Sciences within the U.S. Department of Education. The primary

contractor for this study

is the Research Triangle In stitute (RTI) International, and subcontractors include Coffey Consulting; Hermes; HR Directions; Research Support Services; and Strategic Communications, Inc, with Dr. Sandy Baum as a consultant. This request is to conduct the HSL S:09 S econd F ollow - up field test in 2015 and panel maintenance for the main study sample , and to describe the planned data collections for the main study . Following the field test study , NCES will provide the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) with a memorandum summarizing any changes planned for the main study data collection, and a revised OMB package. The main study will include a survey of panel members , collection of their postsecondary transcript s and financial aid records, and file matching to various extant data sources. The materials that will be used in the 2015 - 16 main study will be based upon the field test materials included in this submissi on. Additionally , this submission is designed to adequately justify the need for and overall practical utility

of the full study

and to present the overarching plan for all of the phases of the data collection, providing as much detail about the measures to be used as is available at the time of this submission. As part of this submission, NCES is publishing a notice in the Federal Register allowing first a 60 - and then a 30 - day

public comment period. For the final proposal for the full study , after the fie ld test, NCES will publish a notice in the Federal Register allowing an additional 30 - day public comment period on the final details of the 2015 - 16 main study . This submission includes:  A membership list of the Technical Review Panel (TRP) for the data col lection component of HSL S:09 (appendix A);  Confidentiality

procedures for administrative record matching (appendix B );  The data security language for vendor contracts (appendix C )  Communication m aterials for survey respondent s (appendix D );  Facsimiles for the HSL S:09 Second Follow - up interview , abbreviated interview, and reinterview instruments ;  Transcript data request contacting materials and d ata elements (appendix F); and  F inancial aid records collection request contacting materials and data elements (appendix G ) .A. Justification Supporting Statement Request for OMB Review (SF83I)

2 The HSL S:09 base - ye ar data collection took place in the 2009

– 10 school year, with a randoml y selected sample of fall - term 9th - graders in more than 900 public and private high schools with both 9 th and 11th grades. 1 This fall 2009 cohort of 9 th graders has been followed over time, with follow - ups in spri ng 2012 and summer - fall 2013. Administrative records (such as high school transcripts) have also been collected. The basic components and key desi gn features of HSL S:09 are summarized in exhibit A - 1 below , by wave of data collection : **Exhibit A -**  **1. HSLS:09 Data**  **Collection Components, by wave of data collection** Base Year 1st Follow -up 2013

Update 2nd Follow -up Sample Member Survey ◊ ◊ ◊ ◊ Sample Member Math Assessment ◊ ◊ Parent Survey ◊ ◊ School Counselor Survey ◊ ◊ School Administrator Survey ◊ ◊ Math Teacher Survey ◊ Science Teacher Survey ◊ High School Transcripts ◊ Postsecondary

Transcripts ◊ Administrative Data (e.g., SAT, ACT, GED, CPS , NSLDS ,

NSC , Voting data) ◊ ◊ HSL S:09 data will allow researchers, educators, and policy makers to examine motivation, achievement, and persistence in STEM course - taking and careers. More generall y, HSLS:09 data will allow researchers from a variety of disciplines to examine issues of college entry, persistence, and success, and how changes in young people’s lives and their connections with communities, schools, teachers, families, parents, and friends affect these decision s , including:  academic (especiall y in math and science), social, and interpersonal growth;  transitions from high school to postsecondary education, and from school to work;  students’ choices about, access to, and persistence in math and science courses, majors, and careers;  the characteristics of high schools and postsecondary institutions and their impact on student outcomes;  family

formation, including marriage and famil y development, and how prior experiences in and out of school correlate with these decisions; and  the contexts of education, including how minority and at - risk status is associated with education and labor market outcomes.

1 Types of schools that were excluded from the sample based on the HSLS:09 eligibility definitions are described as part of the discussion of the target population in the HSLS:09 Base - Year Data File Documentation (see chapter 3, section 3.2.1), Ingels et al . (2011). See the same source for further information about the study sample design, including state - representative samples and base year student oversampling.Supporting Statement Request for OMB Review (SF83I) A. Justification

3 **A.1.b Legislative Authorization**  HSL S:09 is authorized under the Education Sciences Reform Act (ESRA) of 2002 (20 U.S.C. § 9543). **A.1.c Prior and Related Studies**  In 1970, NCES initiated a program of longitudinal high school studies. Its purpose was to gather time - series data on nationally represent ative samples of high school students that would be pertinent to the formulation and evaluation of education polices. Starting in 1972, with the National Longitudinal Study of the High School Class of 1972 (NL S:72), NCES began providing education policy makers and researchers with longitudinal data that linked education experiences with later outcomes, such as early labor market experiences and postsecondary education enrollment and attainment. The NL S:72 cohort of high school seniors was surveyed five times (in 1972, 1973, 1974, 1979, and 1986). A wide variety of interview data were collected in the follow - up survey s, including data on students’ family background, schools attended, labor force participation, famil y formation, and job satisfaction. In additio n, postsecondary

transcripts were collected. Almost 10 years later, in 1980, the second in a series of NCES longitudinal survey s was launched, this time starting with two high school cohorts. High School and Beyond (HS&B) included one cohort of high school seniors comparable to the seniors in NLS:72. The second cohort within HS&B extended the age span and anal ytical range of NCES’s longitudinal studies by surveying a sample of high school sophomores. With the sophomore cohort, information became available to study the relationship between earl y high school experiences and students’ subsequent education experiences in high school. For the first time, national data were available showing students’ academic growth over time and how family , community , school, an d classroom factors promoted or inhibited student learning. In a leap forward for education studies, researchers, using data from the extensive battery of cognitive tests within HS&B, were also able to assess the growth of cognitive abilities over time. Mo reover, data were now available to anal yz e the school experiences of students who later dropped out of high school. These data became a rich resource for policy

makers and researchers over the next decade and provided an empirical base to inform the debates of the education reform movement that began in the earl y 1980s. Both cohorts of HS&B participants were resurveyed in 1982, 1984, and 1986. The sophomore cohort was also resurveyed in 1992. Postsecondary

transcripts were collected for both cohorts. The thi rd longitudinal study of students conducted by NCES was the National Education Longitudinal Study

of 1988 (NEL S:88). NEL S:88 further extended the age and grade span of NCES longitudinal studies by

beginning the data collection with a cohort of eighth - grade rs. Along with theA. Justification Supporting Statement Request for OMB Review (SF83I)

4 student survey , it included survey s of parents, teachers, and school administrators. It was designed not only to follow a single cohort of students over time (as had NCES’s earlier longitudinal studies, NLS:72 and HS&B), but also, b y “freshening” the sample at each of the first two follow - ups, to follow three nationally representative grade cohorts over time (8th - , 10th, and 12th - grade cohorts). This provided not only comparability

of NEL S:88 to existing cohorts, but it also enabled researchers to conduct both cross sectional inter- cohort and longitudinal intra - cohort anal ys es of the data. In 1993, high school transcripts were collected. Students were interviewed again in 1994 and 2000, and in 2000

–01 their postsecondary education transcripts were collected. The Education Longitudinal Study of 2002 (ELS:2002) was the fourth longitudinal high school cohort study

conducted by

NCES. EL S:2002 started with a sophomore cohort and was designed to provide trend data about the critical transitions e xperienced by students as they

proceed ed through high school and into postsecondary education or their careers. Student interview s and assessments in reading and mathematics were collected along with surveys of parents, teachers, and school administrators. In addition, a facilities component and school library/media studies component were added for this study series. Freshening occurred at the first follow - up in 2004 to allow for a nationally representative cohort of high school seniors, which was followed by the collection of high school transcripts. A second follow - up was conducted in 2006, and a third follow - up in 2012 (with a postsecondary education transcript component in 2013) . These studies have investigated the education, personal, and vocational dev elopment of students, and the school, familial, community , personal, and cultural factors that affect this development. Each of these studies has provided rich information about the critical transition from high school to postsecondary education and the wo rkforce. HSLS:09 will continue on the path of its predecessors while also focusing on the factors associated with choosing, persisting in, and succeeding in STEM course - taking and careers. **A.2 Purpose and Use of Information Collection**  HSL S:09 links to its predecessor longitudinal studies by addressing many of the same issues of transition from high school to postsecondary education and the labor force. At the same time, HSL S:09 brings a new and special emphasis to the study of youth transition by

exploring the path s that lead students to pursue and persist in courses and careers in the fields of science, technology , engineering, and mathematics (STEM). HSL S:09 is designed to measure math achievement gains in the first 3 ye ars of high school, but also to relate tested achievement to students’ choice, access, and persistence of courses, college, and careers, especially in science, technology , engineering, and mathematics pipelines. The HSL S:09 assessment serves not just as an outcome measure, but also as a predictor of readiness toSupporting Statement Request for OMB Review (SF83I) A. Justification

5 proceed into college and, in particular, STEM courses and careers, while tested achievement in mathematics can also be used as a baseline covariate in multivariate longitudinal anal ys es. Interview s focus on factors that shape students ’ decision - making about courses and postsecondary options, including what factors, from parental input to considerations of financial aid for postsecondary education, enter into these decisions. There are several reasons the transition into adulthood is of special interest to federal policy and programs. Adolescence is a time of phy sical and psychological changes. Attitudes, aspirations, and expectations are sensitive to the stimuli that adolescents experience, and environments influence the process of choo sing among opportunities. Parents, educators, and those involved in education policy decisions all share the need to understand the effects that the presence or absence of good guidance from the school, in combination with that from the home, can have on t he educational, occupational, and social success of youth. These patterns of transition cover individual and institutional characteristics. At the individual level, the study

examines education attainment and personal development. In response to policy and scientific issues, data have been gathered on the demographic and background correlates of education outcomes. By

collecting extensive information from students, parents, school staff, and school records, it will be possible to investigate the relationship between home and school factors and academic achievement, interests, and social development at this critical juncture. Resources to assist in guiding parents and students through the college decision process, from information - seeking behaviors to filing financial aid forms, can be explored in terms of how they relate to college entry . Additionall y, because the initial survey

focused on 9th - graders, it also permits the identification and study of high school (and later, college) dropouts . HSL S:09 is intend ed to be a general - purpose dataset; that is, it is designed to serve multiple policy objectives. Policy

issues studied through HSLS:09 include the identification of school attributes and processes associated with mathematics achievement, college entry , and career choice ; postsecondary access, choice, persistence, and attainment ; the factors associated with dropping out of the education sy stem; and the transition of different groups (for example, racial and ethnic, gender, and socioeconomic status groups) from high school to postsecondary institutions and the labor market, and especiall y into STEM curricula and careers. HSL S:09 will provide a strong basis for investigators to inquire into students’ attitudes, beliefs, expectancies, values , and goals . Research ers can investigate factors affecting risk and resiliency , gather information about the social capital available to sample members, inquire into the nature of student interests and decision - making, and delineate students’ curricular and extracurricularA. Justification Supporting Statement Request for OMB Review (SF83I)

6 exp eriences in both high school and higher education. HSL S:09 includes measures of school climate; each student’s native language and language use; student and parental education expectations; attendance at school; course and program selection; college plans, preparation, and information - seeking behavior; interactions with teachers and peers; as well as parental resources and support. The HSL S:09 data elements are designed to support research that speaks to the underl yi ng dy namics and education processes that influence student achievement, growth, and personal development over time. HSL S:09 is first and foremost a longitudinal study; hence survey items are chosen for their usefulness in predicting or explaining future outcomes as measured in later survey waves. Compared to its earlier counterparts, there are considerable changes to th e design of HSL S:09 that will limit the ability to produce trend comparisons. There are two such limiting factors in particular. One is that there was no sample freshening in HSLS:09. In consequence, there is no representative spring senior cohort (or soph omore cohort), but rather a fall 9 th grade cohort, unrepresentative of any other grade, followed over time. The second reason, closely related to the first, is that none of the data collection points in HSLS:09 correspond with the collection points in the prior secondary longitudinal studies (e.g., NELS:88 at grades 8, 10, and 12) . At the same time, HSL S:09 and the prior studies alike deal with the same basic issues : the transition through high school and into the postsecondary world, represented primaril y by education and work. Comparisons between HSL S:09 and the four earlier studies may be made at this higher level of generality. Comparisons cannot be made on the basis of data collections at the precise same grades (e.g., senior trends) , since different co llectio n points were used . The fact that precise grade - by- grade comparisons cannot be made is of consequence for HSL S:09 in that HSL S:09 has greater latitude in incorporating new interview items, given that the trend measurement requirement of asking the s ame thing in the same way as previous studies is no longer of strict relevance. In the second follow - up main study , in addition to sample member interviews, college transcripts and financial aid student records will be collected from the postsecondary institutions attended by

those HSL S:09 sample members who have enrolled in postsecondary education . The two data sources will address a range of issues concerning students’ enrollment and course taking patterns, progress and attainment in postsecondary education, and the types, sources, and amounts of student aid recei ved across ye ars of attendance. **Pos tsecondary Transcript Collection**  **.** As an official institution record, the postsecondary transcript is a more reliable source of data regarding academic performance than is a student’s self - report. The transcript collection for HSL S:09, which will be designe d like that conducted for ELS:2002 and BPS:04/09, will provide much - needed information on the course of study of today ’s college students as they begin, leave, and re - enter postsecondary study and transfer between institutions. The combination ofSupporting Statement Request for OMB Review (SF83I) A. Justification

7 transcrip ts and other study data collected through interviews, file matching, and record abstraction will afford researchers the opportunity to anal yz e paths taken by cohort members as they

begin undergraduate education . Postsecondary transcripts provide a wealth o f data on enrollment, including degree or certificate program, terms enrolled and course intensity when enrolled, and fields of study . Furthermore, transcripts provide coursetaking de tails including subjects taken and credits and grades earned. These data provide important link s between secondary academic performance , plans and expectations, and pathway s into the workforce of the sample member s . **Financial Aid Student Record Collection .**  Despite access to federal aid databases, a complete picture of all non - f

ederal inputs into student financial aid has been lacking in the secondary longitudinal studies, constituting a severe limitation in the postsecondary years of the survey . Availability of financial aid is important at all points in the postsecondary proces s (initial access and choice, persistence, transfer, and ultimate educational attainment). The financial aid data records collected from the institutions attended b y HS LS :09 sample members will greatly increase the anal ytic power of HSLS:09

– cumulative ai d and debt, generall y ata midpoint through postsecondary education, can be calculated with the availability

of scholarship, fellowship, grant, and loan amount. Additionally , two panel maintenance collections are planned. The first will take place in summer of 2015 for the main study sample , and a second panel maintenance collection may take place in early 2018 with the field test and main study samples in anticipation of another follow - up with this cohort . **A.2.a Content Justifications**  **Overview.** This s ection contains justifications for the HSL S:09 Second Follow - up field test instrument, reflecting the main research objectives of the study overall, and for this specific round in particular. The draft field test interview has been included in Appendix E . The second follow - up survey items serve to support the overall purposes of HSL S:09, which are to understand the factors (e.g., experiences, behaviors, attitudes, interactions with people) that influence students’ decision - making process es about postsecondary enrollment and coursetaking , and occupation goals, and to understand how these decisions evolve in the years after secondary school , ultimately marking the transition to adult status (as seen in education attainment, career, family formation, etc.). For those in (or ahead of) modal high school grade progression sequence (that is, those who completed high school by 2013, including earl y and on - time graduates), the prime foci of the interview s will be sub - baccalaureate attainment, labor market status of those who are working part - or full - time, postsecondary

transfer, and postsecondary persistence . The second follow - up interview will also updateA. Justification Supporting Statement Request for OMB Review (SF83I)

8 information on high school attainment for students who, as of the 2013 update, had dropped out, or were held b ack a grade or more, in their secondary schooling. At the time of the second follow - up, the HSL S:09 cohort will be similar to members of the first follow - up of the 2012 - 14 Beginning Postsecondary

Students Longitudinal Study (BPS:12/14). BPS covers all post secondary entrants, early and late, while HSL S:09 does not include late entrants but provides a comparison group that is not in postsecondary

education. Such comparison draws on the fact that those HSLS:09 cohort members who start postsecondary

education the fall after modal high school graduation will have the same time spread between that time point and the HSL S:09 s econd f ollow - up survey

as do BPS cohort members who started postsecondary

education immediately

after high school completion. In other words , both the BPS and the HSL S:09 immediate entrants are followed 3 years after first enrollment . The draft HSLS:09 Second Follow - up interview appears as Appendix E of this submission. The primary research areas drive the survey instrument: (1 ) High School Attainment; (2) Postsecondary Access and Choice ; ( 3) Attainment of Sub - baccalaureate Credentials : (4) Postsecondary Education Transfer and Persistence ; ( 5 ) Career Development ; and (6) Labor Market Experience. Each of these areas shall be separatel y discussed . Some additional subthemes that are represented on the interview will also be mentioned: marriage and family formation and the college experience. **1. High School Attainment**  While information on high school completion is available for on - time graduates, the h igh school completion status of the remainder of the cohort must be addressed again in the HSL S:09 Second Follow up. Dropouts, and students who take extra time to complete secondary school, are of high policy interest. Prior round nonrespondents also need to have their enrollment data updated. The prior secondary longitudinal studies show large numbers of high school dropouts eventually achieving alternative credentials (such as the GED) or returning to high school, while others remain without high school c ompletion or equivalency even eight ye ars after their cohort’s modal graduation date. GED administrative records are also a possible source for this topic area, and have been collected for prior secondary longitudinal studies. **2. Access and Choice**  Access to postsecondary

education can be conceptualized in multiple way s, which are not necessarily

mutuall y exclusive. Academic access, for example, is more limited for dropouts and for low achieving students, while financial access speaks to the possible gaps between student resources and student aid programs. Access is also influenced b y expectations and aspirations. Those with academic and financial access may

choose to enroll in postsecondary education. Enrollment, in turn, is affected bySupporting Statement Request for OMB Review (SF83I) A. Justification

9 factors that may

enhance or inhibit choice: academic preparation ( e.g., coursetaking, grades, and tested mathematics achievement); individual - level characteristics such as education and occupation or career aspirations or expectations; and family background characteristics s uch as family income, parental education, and educational expectations for their child. Choice is sometimes characterized as the ability to attend an institution that is the best academic fit at an affordable price. Financial wherewithal is a key aspect of choice, not just in the sense of ability to pay , but also in terms of earl y perceptions of cost, which may affect both college preparation and the application process (which has been meticulousl y captured in the earlier rounds of HSL S:09). The degree of c hoice available to students affects the type and sector of postsecondary institutions attended (for example, 2 - ye ar versus 4 - ye ar public or private institutions); intensity of attendance (full - versus part time); whether enrollment is at the “first choice” institution; and its location (urban, suburban, or rural; near home or distant). For students whose individual background and family resources enable a range of postsecondary

education options, the concept of choice incorporates institutional characteristics such as the appeal of social and athletic environments and the academic prestige or ethos of a school . **3. Attainment of Sub**  **- baccalaureate Credentials**  The timing of the second follow - up does not provide a basis for studyi ng baccalaureate attainment. Howeve r, the 3 - ye ar post - graduation gap offers a window into attainment of 2 - year degrees, postsecondary

certificates, and certifications . As well, the timing provides an opportunity to study the transition from community college settings to 4 - year programs. Thi s is a research issue to be vigorously pursued in the interview , and administrative data will be sought to further enhance the picture of sub baccalaureate attainment. **4. Transfer and Persistence**  Persistence , staying the course until graduation or certificati on, is clearl y of great importance to HSL S:09

—although the timing of this measurement within the secondary longitudinal studies has been an issue. Historically

in HS&B, NELS:88, and ELS:2002, a basis for studyi ng persistence has not been provided in the fi rst measurement point past high school (two years), but at the end of the study (around age 26 for NEL S and ELS) with multiple postsecondary interview data points and continuous coursetaking data from the postsecondary transcripts. Here , HSLS:09 will once more prove its singularity in the study

series, given the 3 - ye ar post - graduation gap and the possibility of a postsecondary

transcripts collection option. As a result, HSL S:09 may be looked to for providing highly timely and excellent information on earl y persistence in baccalaureate programs, and even better information about sub baccalaureate persistence and attainment (both in school, and in major or field of study). The same mayA. Justification Supporting Statement Request for OMB Review (SF83I)

10 be the case for understan ding progress through the curriculum and , relatedly , transfer and institutional mobility . **5. Career Development**  ( Major, Field of Study, and Employment History as Pathways into Career Formation

) Career development is a natural focus for any longitudinal social capital study of young people, but it is given special salience b y the HSL S:09 stress on STEM careers. Career status can be elicited from the context of the current job, and status and plans can also be represented through questions about the occupation o r job expected at age 30. A perhaps richer tack to be considered for the construct of career status or plans is to be found in social - cognitive career theory . The field test will give due consideration to testing social cognitive measures for the HSL S:09 S econd Follow - up . Based on the notion that people learn b y observing others , social cognitive scales of the education domain (or of occupation/the work place) can be used to measure several key constructs, some that may complement and build on HSLS:09 base year data: self

- efficacy , outcome expectations, occupational interests, work supports and barriers, domain satisfaction, and persistence intentions among them. S ocial cognitive career theory measures were developed for and included in the final follow - up o f EL S:2002 . S uch measures would be stronger on HSL S:09 Second Follow - up because they are ideally

longitudinal: the outcomes of these predictors could be captured in future rounds. **6. Labor Market Experience**  Labor market pathways of high school graduates and dropouts who do not participate in postsecondary

education can be captured in the second follow - up. Some of the effects of job - related training and adult education can also be investigated at this juncture in HSLS:09. Recent h istory has seen a growing consensus about the sophisticated skill requirements of the “21 st century workforce.” Along with the formal education training of workers, the new flexible workforce will need workers who are continuously

learning new skills and c ompetencies, some of which may be validated with formal professional licensure and certification. While postsecondary education and labor experiences are prime foci, it should be remembered that NELS:88 and EL S:2002 show that, at ages 20 and 26, a substant ial number of student sample members (sometimes in the range of 10 percent) reported that they were engaged in neither school nor work for pay . Second follow - up items must also capture the activities and experiences of these individuals, some of whom are unemployed or stay- at - home parents. **7. Related Sub**  **- themes:**  **Marriage, Family; College Experience** Marriage and family formation is another marker of the transition to adulthood. Though this sub theme warrants less interview space than the work and postsecondary education question series, it remainsSupporting Statement Request for OMB Review (SF83I) A. Justification

11 important to gather the basic facts of domestic arrangements, keeping in mind that work and education opportunities may

in part be influenced or conditioned by constraints such as child care, or may be positively or negatively

supported by

marriage. College Experience : Since this round marks the data collection in which most cohort members will be students in a postsecondary setting, it will be the preferred time to ask questions a bout the college experience. Just as students are influenced b y their high school education experience, postsecondary settings exert peer and instructor influence, and reflect academic climate as well. The extent of students’ engagement and time spent in c ollege activities and its perceived contributions to students ’ overall development of knowledge and skills may also relate to students ’ subsequent career development and other life course outcomes. The college experience is a research area that may well su pport substantial numbers of questions that are new to the secondary longitudinal studies series. **Postsecondary Transcripts and Financial Aid Records.** The list s of data elements for both the postsecondary

transcript collection and the financial aid record collection can be found in Appendix F and G, respectively . The HSLS :09 PETS will include the same data elements as the previously- approved PETS in ELS: 20 02, B&B:08/09, and BPS:04/09, including: case information, schools and terms, academic honors, tests, degrees and majors, and courses . The data elements for the financial aid record collection will be the same as those collected for the EL S:2002 Financial Aid Feasibility Study and the National Postsecondary

Student Aid Study

(NPSAS). Potential research top ics are discussed below. **Postsecondary Transcripts.** Researchers have found, in analy ses of HS&B and NEL S:88 PETS (e.g., Adelman 2006 2 ), that “academic intensity of the student’s high school curriculum” counts importantly

in providing momentum toward comple ting a bachelor’s degree. Transcripts provide unique, empirical data on student course - taking, performance, transfer, academic momentum and intensity, fields of study , and degree outcomes. Combined with student interview and high school transcript data, po stsecondary

transcript data can create a rich analy tic resource for the study of postsecondary education. The HSL S:09 PETS is the sixth in a series of postsecondary education transcript studies of high school cohorts; the first (NL S:72) took place in 1984, and was followed b y HS&B sophomore cohort (1993), HS&B senior cohort (1986), NELS:88 (2000), and ELS:2002 (2012). Postsecondary education transcript studies have also been undertaken in connection with BPS and Baccalaureate and Beyond (B&B) longitudinal s tudies . A fundamental difference is that BPS and B&B are grounded in a nationallyrepresentative sample of postsecondary institutions (NPSAS) while the high school studies are based on a 2 Adelman, C. (2006). “ The Toolbox Revisited: Paths to Degree Completion from High School Through College” Washington, DC: US Department of Education.A. Justification Supporting Statement Request for OMB Review (SF83I)

12 grade cohort - based secondary school sample. In addition, BPS captures all students entering postsecondary

education , while the high school studies miss late entrants. Likewise, B&B is representative of baccalaureate recipients, while studies such as HSL S:09 and EL S:2002 (which lack both late entrants and late completers) are not. While HSL S:09 cannot produce national estimates of postsecondary transfers or address the pathway s of late entrants, its link to high school data provides rich information on the antecedents and pathway s of individuals entering postsecondary education fairl y promptl y after high school. Some research topics that can be addressed with the HSL S:09 transcript data include:  Academic preparation

– As a longitudin al study , HSL S:09 is positioned to provide data on secondary school preparation and postsecondary outcomes. The combined interview and high school transcript data offer insight on the academic preparation of students, including the courses they took and th eir performance. Postsecondary transcripts will add data on subsequent course taking and performance, creating opportunities to study the student academic experience over time.  Transfer

– By

collecting transcripts from all postsecondary institutions sample members are known to have attended, the study enables analy sis of the movement of students and credits between institutions. Example research questions include: How prevalent is student transfer between institutions, including co - enrollment, and how are c redits transferred between institutions? How does transfer impact student outcomes?  Course - taking

– Anal ys is of transcripts across the student sample provide s insights on postsecondary

education offerings and student course taking. Frequencies of courses in particular topic areas can be examined, such as STEM , occupational , or remedial courses. Course - taking data can be combined with data on student program ty pe, level (e.g. freshman), degree attainment, school sector, and a variety of other variables to gain insight on how course - taking varies across student and institution ty

pes. Additional course data, such as credits earned or attempted and grade point averages in selected topic areas can give further insights on performance and progress of the study pop ulation. Example research questions include: How does course taking vary for students at public, private non - profit , and private for- profit institutions, or at 4 - year, 2 - ye ar, and less - than 2 - ye ar institutions? How does course - taking influence persistence and other student outcomes?  Academic performance - Transcripts provide more detailed data on academic performance than can be collected from any other source. Grade data from transcripts can be used to examine performance in specific subject areas or in se lected time periods (e.g. 1 st ye ar students). Grade data can be combined with degree attainment, stop - out, transfer, or interview data such as employ ment and income to create a more detailed picture of how academic performance relates to progress and student outcomes.  Credit accumulation

– Similar to academic performance, transcripts provide a unique opportunity to analyze student credit accumulation. Credit accumulation can be measured across institutions and across time, enabling anal ys is of concepts such as enrollment intensity (i.e. full - time or part time enrollment) and time to degree. How much does part - time enrollment delay degree completion, and does it decrease the likelihood of earning a degree? Transcript data provide an additional dimension to th e anal ys is of time to degree and persistence, introducing the added detail of how credits were earned during the time a student was enrolled.Supporting Statement Request for OMB Review (SF83I) A. Justification

13  “Events”

– Transcripts provide empirical evidence of events in postsecondary enrollment such as stop - outs, transfers, summer or dual enrollment periods, and other phenomena that are difficult to capture or measure solely with self - reported data. Patterns of attendance, such as swirling or moving from 2 - ye ar to 4 - ye ar institutions can also be anal yz ed. **Financial Aid Records.**  As stated above, the content is extracted from the set of financial aid data elements developed for ELS:2002 and NPSAS. Availability of financial aid is important at all points in the postsecondary

process (initial access and choice, persistence, transfer, and ultimate educational attainment). More detail pertaining to item justification can be found in Appendix G . Additional data for the HSL S:09 sample will be obtained from a variety of administrative data sources. These include queries of the Central Processing S ys tem ( CPS ) , the National Student L oan Data Sy stem (NSLDS) containing Pell loan and grant files, the GED testing service, the National Student Clearinghouse (NSC), vendors of national undergraduate student admission tests including ACT and SAT scores , and vendors of voter registration data . The security procedures in place for the linkages to administrative data are presented in appendix B, and a description of the data security language for vendor contracts sources is provided in appendix C . **A.3 Use of Improved Information Technology**  The website for data collection will reside on NCES’ SSL - encry pted servers. HSL S:09 will use web - based interview s across two modes of data collection, self - administered survey s and computer assisted telephone interviewing (CATI), and will be made mobile - friendl y to allow participants to complete the full survey

on a tablet or smartphone. On a nightl y basis, the data collection contractor, RTI , will download interview data, in batches, to its Enhanced Security Network (ESN) via a secure web service. Once in the ESN, data will be cleaned and undergo quality anal ys is. In the main study , data will be collected from the p ostsecondary institutions attended by

HSL S:09 sample members . These institutions will be identified as part of the 2016 main study survey . For the transcript and financial aid records collections to be conducted in 2017, institutions will receive an announ cement in which institution staff will be invited to access the NCES postsecondary data portal website where they

will find information on the purposes of the collections, along with forms and instructions, FAQs, endorsements, legal authority, and how to c ontact project staff. To access restricted pages containing confidential information, the user will be required to log in by entering an assigned ID number and password. Once each task is completed, institution staff will no longer be able to access it, but a status screen will indicate which stages of data collection have been concluded .A. Justification Supporting Statement Request for OMB Review (SF83I)

14 **A.3.a Postsecondary Transcripts:**  **HSLS:09 PETS** In formation technology

will be employed in the collection of postsecondary transcripts and course catalogs from the instituti ons attended by HSL S:09 sample members. As a first step, RTIwill collect course catalogs for and postsecondary transcripts from institutions where HSL S:09 cohort members were enrolled. College Source Online will be the initial source of catalogs. Any i nstitutions for which catalogs cannot be obtained in that manner will be asked to provide the course catalogs directly to RTI via the means of their choice, such as email, postal mail, or other methods. Postsecondary transcripts will be requested from all ins titutions known to have been attended by the sample member since high school , and can be transmitted via upload, electronic fax, and other secure means (section B.3.a includes a description of each method) . The first phase comprises a small sample of the i nstitutions reported b y sample members and will serve as a pilot to test sy stems and procedures. The second phase involves collecting data from the rest of the institutions , and the third phase reviewing postsecondary transcripts collected during phase one and two, identifying new student - institution linkages, and following up with the new institutions so identified. A keying and coding s ys tem (KCS) will be used for data entry of the transcripts received. The KCS application, developed by RTI , includes data entry

fields corresponding to the key data elements to be collected from transcripts. Following quality control and data cleaning processes, data collected from transcripts are assembled into data files for subsequent anal ys is. **A.3.b. Financial Aid Record**  **s Collection: HSLS:09 FAR**  To ensure the efficiency , quality , and ease of the financial aid student records collection, HSL S:09 FAR will use a web - based application. Similar to what is used on NPSAS studies, multiple options will be offered to an institution for providing student data, including: (1) uploading electronic (.csv) files to a secure web site; (2) downloading an Excel workbook from the web site, then uploading the completed file to the site; and (3) use of a web - based data entry interfa ce. An online video tutorial will be available to show users exactly how to navigate through the application and help screens will provide users with more in - depth explanations of the required items. The web - based application will allow error checking to b e performed immediately by institution staff. An important feature of the online application is that different institution staff can complete portions of the required data entry

and can complete the data entry in multiple sessions. These features reduce us er burden while ensuring that the most accurate data are collected.Supporting Statement Request for OMB Review (SF83I) A. Justification

15 **A.4 Efforts to Identify Duplication and Use of Similar Information**  Since the inception of its secondary education longitudinal studies program in 1970, NCES has consulted with other federal offices to ensure that the data collected in this important series of longitudinal studies do not duplicate the information from any other national data sources within the U.S. Department of Education or other government agencies. In addition, NCES staff regularly consult with nonfederal associations such as the College Board, American Educational Research Association, the American Association of Community Colleges, and other groups to confirm that the data to be collected through this study series are no t available from any other sources. These consultations also provided, and continue to provide through the HSLS:09 Technical Review Panel, methodological insights from the results of other studies of secondary

and postsecondary

students and labor force members, and they ensure that the data collected through HSLS:09 will meet the needs of the federal government and other interested agencies and organizations. Other longitudinal studies of secondary and postsecondary

students (i.e., NLS:72, HS&B, NEL S:88, EL S:2002) have been conducted by NCES in the past. HSL S:09 builds on and extends these studies rather than duplicating them. First, current efforts explicitly complement the redesign of NPSAS and BPS with the instrumentation and design of HSL S:09. Second, de sign articulation with prior NCES secondary longitudinal studies (though more limited for HSLS:09 than for prior secondary longitudinal studies) also show coordination, not duplication. These earlier studies were conducted during the 1970s, 1980s, 1990s, and the early

2000s and represent education, employ ment, and social experiences and environments different from those experienced b y the HSL S:09 student sample. In addition to extending prior studies temporally

as a time series, HSL S:09 extends them conceptuall y. Unlike preceding secondary longitudinal studies, HSLS:09 provides data that are necessary to understand the role of different factors in the development of student commitment to attend higher education and then to take the steps necessary to succeed in college (taking the right courses, taking courses in specific sequences, etc.). Further, HSL S:09 focuses on the factors associated with choosing and persisting in mathematics and science course - taking and STEM careers. These focal points present a mark ed difference between HSLS:09 and its predecessor studies. While National Science Foundation s tudies such as the Survey of Recent College Graduates cover some of the same ground as the postsecondary rounds of HSL S:09, the NSF effort is more narrowl y focuse d , does not follow a nationally representative sample of secondary school students, and thereby does not provide measures of outcomes of secondary education experiences . Additionally, NSF was activel y involved in the design stage of HSL S:09 and provided fi nancial assistance for augmentation s ofA. Justification Supporting Statement Request for OMB Review (SF83I)

16 certain state public high school samples so as t o provide a robust and representative basis for anal ys es with a subset of states. The only other dataset that offers so large an opportunity to understand the key

trans itions into postsecondary

institutions or the world of work are the Department of Labor ’s (Bureau of Labor Statistics) National L ongitudinal Survey of Youth 1979 and 1997 cohorts (NL SY79, NLSY97). However, the NL SY youth cohorts represent temporall y earlier cohorts than HSLS:09. There are also important design differences between NL SY79/ NL SY97 and HSL S:09 that render them more complementary to each other rather than duplicative. NL SY is a household - based longitudinal survey , while HSL S:09 is school - based. For both NLSY cohorts, Armed Service Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) test data are available, but there is no longitudinal high school achievement measure. Although NLSY97 also gathers information from schools (including principal and teacher reports and high school and postsecondary transcripts), given its household sampling basis, it cannot study school processes in the same way as HSL S:09. Any

given school contains only one to a handful of NL SY97 sample members, a number that constitutes neither a representative sample of students in the school nor a sufficient number to provide within - school estimates. Thus, although both studies provide important information for understanding the transition from high school to the labor market, HSL S:09 is uniquely a ble to provide information about education processes and within - school dy namics and how these affect both school achievement and ultimate labor market outcomes, including outcomes in science, technology , engineering, and mathematics education and occupatio ns. On the NL SY97 side of the equation, the NL SY is uniquely able to construct continuous labor market event histories for decades past graduation . **A.5 Impact on Small Businesses or Other Small Entities**  Target respondents for HSL S:09 Second Follow - up interviews are individuals and the data collection activities will not involve burden to small businesses or entities. For the main study postsecondary

transcript and financial aid record collections, s ome sm all for- profit schools and other small public and private schools will be contacted. Burden on these schools will be minimized by working closely with a school - appointed coordinator (e.g., the registrar) before the start of the data collection to identify the format in which records are kept and transmitted. T o further minimize burden , c ourse catalogs will be collected from a public online resource when available. To accommodate any constraints imposed by record - keeping s ys tems, schools will be offered alternative methods of providing the requested transcripts and financial aid student records as described above in section A.3 .Supporting Statement Request for OMB Review (SF83I) A. Justification

17 **A.6 Consequences of Collecting the Information Less Frequently**  Exhibit A - 2 below documents the periodicity of HSL S:09: **Exhibit A -**  **2 .**  **Longitudinal design for the HSLS:09 ninth -**  **grade cohort: 2009 –** **25**

Recent education and social welfare reform initiatives, changes in federal policy concerning postsecondary

student support, and other interventions necessitate frequent studies. Repeated surveys are also necessary

because of rapid changes in the secondary and postsecondary education environments and the world of work. Indeed, arguabl y, longitudinal information provides better measures of the effects of program, policy , and environmental changes than would multiple cross - sectional inter- cohort studies. The student follow - ups of HSL S:09 are less frequent than the 2 - ye ar interval employed with HS&B, NEL S:88, and ELS:2002. The first follow - up took place at 2.5 ye ars after the base ye ar, and the second follow - up will take place 3 years after the first follow - up . In the 2013 update, d ata were collected at the modal timepoint of high school graduation and a high school transcript study was conducted soon after the summer following graduation to p rovide continuous coursetaking data for all on - time or early completers. By

following up at the end of the students’ junior year, researchers are able to measure achievement gain and postsecondary planning information. Collecting the postsecondary update i n summer 2013 (directl y after most students’ 12th grade ye ar) and high school transcripts in fall 2013 minimize d burden on schools and respondents, while also allowing for further inter- cohort comparabilityA. Justification Supporting Statement Request for OMB Review (SF83I)

18 with the main transition themes of the prior studies. The second follow - up is scheduled to occur in the third ye ar after high school (sprin g 201 6, to be field - tested in 201 5) , which is not on track with the timing of the predecessor studies . The three - year gap, however, offers better articulation with BP S , and facilitates getting sub - baccalaureate attainment data collected in a timely fashion and in great detail. Despite the changes in grade cohorts and data collection time points for the first three rounds, general trends will still be measurable, becaus e the same key transitions, albeit with slightly different data collection points and content , will be captured with the HSL S:09 data. **A.7 Special Circumstances Relating to Guidelines of 5 CFR 1320.5**  All data collection guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.5 are being followed. No special circumstances of data collection are anticipated. **A.8 Consultations Outside NCES**  A panel of highl y qualified substantive and methodological experts were invited to provide advice about the design and conduct of the HSL S:09 Second Foll ow - up study . The first meeting with the HSL S:09 Technical Review Panel (TRP) was held on October 15 th and 16 th , 2014 and include d ten non federal panelists as well as members of NCES, other offices within the U.S. Department of Education, and the federal government . A second TRP meeting is planned for summer - fall 2015 to obtain feedback regarding plans for the main study design. TRP panelists are listed in Attachment C. In addition, suggestions on specific items for the Lesbian, Gay , Bisexual and Transgend er (LGBT) domain were provided by content experts from members of the Gay , Lesbian & Straight Education Network (GL SEN), The Fenway Institute, and the Gender Identity in US Surveillance (GeniUSS) group. Items came from a variety of sources, include the CDC 's Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS), the MA Department of Public Health's Youth Health Survey , and the NICHD's National L ongitudinal Survey of Adolescent Health, among others. Further consultation was also sought with the CDC on these questions. **A.9 Provi**  **sion of Payment or Gift to Respondents**  In centives are proposed as part of the field test data collection plan to encourage response and to minimize nonresponse through refusal conversion . Incentives are also intended to help increase study participation from previously non - responding sample members. The use of incentives provides significant advantages to the government in terms of increased overall response rates and timely data collection , which i n turn, result in decreased data collection costs and more complete data . The proposed incentive for completed interviews in the second follow - up field test is an average of $ 35 per interview. The TestsSupporting Statement Request for OMB Review (SF83I) A. Justification

19 of Procedures and Methods section of the Supporting Statement Part B document (section B.4) discusses in detail the plans for using incentives as part of a responsive design. In the main study , institutions will be reimbursed for the cost of preparing and sending transcripts at the school's standard rate. If additional costs are incurred by the schools, such expense s will be reimburse d to the extent that they are reasonable and properl y documented. Based on a similar postsecondary

transcript collection conducted for EL S:2002 , it is expected that approximately 20 institutions will request and receive reimbursement for expenses for approximately 3 6 0 transcripts at an average cost of $ 7 per transcript, and an average reimbursement of $ 126 for those institutions. For the FAR collection, it is expected that approximately 90 institutions will request and receive reimbursement at an average cost of $200 per institution. The 2015 panel maintenance will consist of a mailing to each sample member and his or her parent/guardian asking that they log onto the survey

website to update contact information or that they complete a hardcop y address update (see appendix D) . Sample members will be offered a $10 incentive for updating their contact information. Our recent experience has shown that offering such an incentive is an effective means of increasing panel maintenance response . For example, sample members i n EL S:2002 were offered $10 to update their contact information during the 2011 panel maintenance period, and updates for approximately 29 percent of sample members were received . A $10 incentive was recently approved 3 for HSL S:09 for the 2014 panel maintenance. Estimates of response burden are developed from experience with the previous HSL S:09 panel maintenance and from other education longitudinal studies (e.g., ELS:2002, NEL S:88). **A.10 Assurance of Confidentiality P**  **rovided to Respondents** NCES assures participating individuals that all identifiable information collected as part of the HSL S :09 study may

be used only

for statistical purposes and may not be disclosed, or used, in identifiable form for any other purpose except as required b y l aw [Education Sciences Reform Act of 2002 (ESRA 2002), 20 U.S.C. § 95 7 3]. HSL S:09 data security and confidential ity

protection procedures are in place to ensure that RTI and its subcontractors comply with all privacy

requirements, including:

 The Statement of Work of this contract;  Privacy

Act of 1974 5 U.S.C. § 552(a);  The U.S. Department of Education Incident Handl ing Procedures (February 2009);

3 Approved in April 2013 (OMB# 1850 - 0852 v.11 & 12).A. Justification Supporting Statement Request for OMB Review (SF83I)

20  The U.S. Department of Education General Handbook for Information Technology Security General Support Sy stems and Major Applications Inventory Procedures (March 2005);  The U.S. Department of Education, ACS Directive OM: 5 - 1 01, Contractor Employee Personnel Security Screenings.  Family

Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974, 20 U.S.C. § 1232(g);  ESRA 2002 , 20 U.S.C. § 9573; and  All new legislation that impacts the data collect ed through this contract. To further ensure that confidentiality is appropriately

maintained at all times, vendors who assist in locating and tracing sample members will be required to follow procedures that safeguard personally identifying information. RTI ’s vendor contracts outline requirements for information security policies and assessments, security awareness training, phys ical and environmental security , monitoring, and access control. They

also specify

the means by

which information may

be transmitted between RTI and the contractor. Additionally , RTI will comply with the Department’s IT security policy requirements as set forth in the Handbook for Information Assurance Security Policy and related procedures and guidance as well as IT security

requirements in the Federal Information Security Manag ement Act (FI SMA), OMB Circulars, and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NI ST) standards and guidance. All data products and publications will also adhere to the NCES Statistical Standards, as described at the website: http://nces.ed.gov/statprog/standards.asp . The HSL S:09 procedures for maintaining confidentiality include notarized nondisclosure affidavits obtained from all personnel who will have access to individual identifiers; personnel training regarding the meaning of confidentiality ; controlled and protected access to computer files; built - in safeguards concerning status monitoring and receipt control sy stems; and a secure, staffed, in - house computing facility . HSLS:09 follow s detailed guidelines for securing sensitive project data, including, but not limited to: physical/environment protections, building access controls, sy stem access controls, sy stem login restrictions, user identification and authorization procedures, encry ption, and project file storage/archiving/destruction . There are security measures in place to protect data during file matching procedures described in section 3. NCES has a secure data transfer s ys tem, which uses Secure Socket Layer (SSL) technology , all owing the transfer of encry pted data over the Internet. The NCES secure server will be used for all administrative data sources with the exception of the NSC which has its own secure FTP site. All data transfers will be encry

pted using FIPS 140 - 2 validated encry ption tools .Supporting Statement Request for OMB Review (SF83I) A. Justification

21 Furthermore, the Department has established a policy regarding the personnel security screening requirements for all contractor emplo ye es and their subcontractors. The contractor must comply with these personnel security screening requirements throughout the life of the contract. The Department directive that contractors must comply with is OM:5 - 101, which was last updated on 7/16/2010. There are several requirements that the contractor must meet for each emplo ye e working on the contract for 30 day s or more. Among these requirements are that each person working on the contract must be assigned a position risk level. The risk levels are high, moderate, and low based upon the level of harm that a person in the position can cause to the Depar tment’s interests. Each person working on the contract must complete the requirements for a “Contractor Security Screening.” Depending on the risk level assigned to each person’s position, a follow - up background investigation b y the Department will occur . Study notification materials sent to sample members will describe the voluntary nature of HSL S:09 and convey

the extent to which respondent identifiers and all responses will be kept confidential. Similarly , the scripts to be read by telephone staff will be very specific in the assurances made to respondents and contacts. Contacting materials are presented in appendix D . The following confidentiality

language is provided in the study brochure that is supplied to all sample members: The High School L ongitudinal Study of 2009 (HSL S:09) Second Follow - Up is conducted under the authority of the Education Sci ences Reform Act (ESRA) of 2002 (20 U.S.C. § 9543) , which authorize s NCES to collect and disseminate information about education in the United States. NCES is required to follow strict procedures to protect personal information in the collection, reporting , and publication of data. All individually identifiable information supplied by

individuals or institutions may be used only

for statistical purposes and may not be disclosed or used in identifiable form for any other purpose, except as required by law (2 0 U.S.C. § 9573). Data security

procedures for HSL S:09 are reviewed and approved by NCES data security staff. Your answers are secured behind firewalls and are encry pted during internet transmission using Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) protocol. All data entry modules are password protected and require the user to log in before accessing confidential data. Project staff is subject to large fines or imprisonment if individual responses are disclosed. Regarding file matching with administrative sources, the Famil y Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) (34 CFR Part 99) allows the disclosure of information without prior consent for the purposes of HSL S:09 according to the following excerpts: 34 CFR § 99.31 poses the question: “Under what conditions is prior con sent not required to disclose information?” and explains in 34 CFR § 99.31 (a) that “An educational agency or institution may

disclose personall y identifiable information from an education record of a student without the consent required b y § 99.30 if the di sclosure meets one or more ” of several conditions. These conditions include, at 34 CFR § 99.31(a)(6)(i) :A. Justification Supporting Statement Request for OMB Review (SF83I)

22 “ The disclosure is to organizations conducting studies for, or on behalf of, educational agencies or institutions to: (A) Develop, validate, or adminis ter predictive tests; (B) Administer student aid programs; or (C) Improve instruction. ” In addition, 34 CFR § 99.31(a)(6)(v) specifies: “For the purposes of paragraph (a)(6) of this section, the term organization includes, but is not limited to, Federal, S tate, and local agencies, and independent organizations.” All three parts of 34 CFR § 99.31(a)(6)(i) appl y to HSL S:09. The purpose of HSL S:09 is to create a research data set for a cohort of ninth - graders that brings together information about academic ach ievement in high school and subsequent participation in postsecondary education along with federal, state, and private financial aid programs. HSLS:09 also gathers background and demographic data to form the context for the outcome variables. The resulting data set allows research and policy anal ys ts to address basic issues about the relationship between high school experiences and participation in postsecondary education and the labor market. The data set can be used for, or on behalf of, educational agenc ies or institutions to accomplish activities (A), (B), and (C). In 34 CFR § 99.31 (a)(6)(iii), FERPA further specifies that such disclosure may onl y occur if “[the] study

is conducted in a manner that does not permit personal identification of parents and students by individuals other than representatives of the organization” and “[the] information is destroyed when no longer needed for the purposes for which the study was conducted.” Appendix F includes a Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act Fact Shee t, which provides institutions with the text of the FERPA requirements. The Fact Sheet includes highlighted passages that indicate the sections that authorize the transcript and financial aid records collection s , and will be included in the packet sent to all institutions from which student data are requested. Additionally , the study , including the administrative data linkage, qualifies for a 45 CFR 46 waiver of consent based on the following factors:

 There is minimal risk to the participants. There is no p hy sical risk and only minimal risk associated with linkage of data to sample members. The public - use and restricted - use data, prepared as part of the contract with RTI, will not include SSNs, even though these numbers are used for the linkage. Data will un dergo disclosure avoidance anal ys is and disclosure treatment steps to further reduce the risk.  The waiver will not affect the rights and welfare of the subjects. The voluntary nature of the study is emphasized to sample members. Public - use and restricted - u se data are only used for research purposes and lack direct individually- identifying information. The data are further protected through disclosure avoidance procedures approved by the NCES Disclosure Review Board.Supporting Statement Request for OMB Review (SF83I) A. Justification

23  Whenever appropriate, subjects will be provided with additional pertinent information after they have participated. For each round of the study, information about prior rounds and the nature of the study is made available to sample members.  The study

cannot be conducted practicabl y without the waiver. To obtain written consent from sample members, multiple forms would have to be sent to the sample members with multiple follow - up telephone and in - person visits. This process would add weeks to the data collection process and is not feasible from a time standpoint. Additionally , the value of these data would be jeopardized from a nonresponse bias perspective.  The potential knowledge to be gained from the study is important enough to justify the waiver. These linked data for HSLS:09 will provide invalu able data to researchers and education policy makers about access to and persistence in postsecondary education and the earl y emplo ym ent activities of young adults in the years beyond high school. Rather than ask sample members certain data elements (e.g. financial aid received, admissions test scores) these data will be obtained through matches to administrative records which will yield more accurate and complete data. A data security

plan (DSP) for HSL S:09 was approved by the IES Disclosure Review Board c hair , and will be updated for the second follow - up . The HSL S:09 plan represents best - practice survey s ys tems and procedures for protecting respondent confidentiality and securing survey

data. **A.11 Justification for Sensitive Questions**  The HSL S:09 Second Fo llow - up survey will include questions about earnings, assets, and debts in order to construct socioeconomic status variables and to calculate need for financial aid for those who have pursued postsecondary education . The Office of Civil Rights is seeking to better understand LGBT students who have been a target of bull yi ng; to help address this, the HSL S:09 survey will include questions on sexual orientation and gender identity . Respondents are assured that all responses are voluntary . **A.12 Estimates of**  **Annualized Burden Hours and Their Cost to Respondents** Estimates of response burden for the HSL S:09 Second Follow - up data collections are shown in Exhibit s A - 3 . Estimates of survey response burden are based on estimates developed from experience with the base - ye ar and first follow - up HSL S:09 interview s and experience on other education longitudinal studies (e.g., EL S:2002, BPS:12/14 ). The response time for institutions participating in transcript collection is expected to vary depending on the number of sampled students who attend the institution and the method selected for transmitting the transcripts. Institutions will be offered five different methods for providing responses including uploading data to the secure study website and sending data to a secure electronic fax server (section B.3 includes a description of each method; fax transmittal sheets may be found in appendix F ). ItA. Justification Supporting Statement Request for OMB Review (SF83I)

24 is expected that some of the transcripts collected will indicate enrollment at additional institutions. Transcripts from any additional institutions identified in the review of transcripts will also be collect ed . There are three methods of data collection available for providing student financial aid records data, one involves keying directly into a secure Web application and tw o involve preparing data and then uploading them to the website (section B.3 includes a description of each method). The estimated average time to provide financial aid records is approximately 3.3 hours per institution. Also included are the estimates for panel maintenance which will be conducted in summer 2015 with the main study

sample, and a planned panel maintenance that may take place in earl y 2018 with the field test and main study

samples in anticipation of an additional follow - up study in 2025. **Exh ibit A**  **- 3. Estimated Burden for HSLS:09 Second Follow**  **- up**  **Data collection activity** Sample Expected response rate Number of

respondents Number of

responses Average

burden per response (minutes) Total

burden (hours) Survey and address d

ata collection from individuals Field test interview 1,100 64% 704 704 35 411 Field test reinterview 100 50% 50 50 10 8 Main study interview 23,316 92% 21,451 21,451 35 12,513 Main study sample panel maintenance 2015 23,316 20% 4,663 4,663 5 389 Field test sample panel maintenance 2018 1,100 20% 220 220 5 18 Main study sample panel maintenance 2018 23,316 20% 4,663 4,663 5 389 **Field test totals 5,367**  **5,417 808**  Records d

ata collection from institutions Postsecondary Transcript collection 3,800 85% 3,230 3,230 30 1,615 Financial Aid Record collection 3,800 85% 3,230 3,230 198 10,659 **Records collections totals 3,23**  **0 6**  **, 46**  **0 12,274**  Note: The current request for OMB approval is only for the field test study burden and the main study sample panel maintenance in 2015 . The total estimated cost to individual respondents is $14,574 , which represents the 808 burden hours times an hourly

rate of $18.04. The hourly rate was obtained by

taking the average of the median weekl y earnings of full - time wage and salary workers 4 among high school graduates with no college and individuals with some college or an associate’s degree.

4 Taken from Table 5 - Quartiles and selected deciles of usual weekly earnings of full - time wage and salary workers by selected characteristics, 3rd quarter 2014 averages, not seasonally adjusted. http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/wkyeng.pdf .Supporting Statement Request for OMB Review (SF83I) A. Justification

25 **A.13 Estimates of Total Annual Cost Burden to Respondents**  There are no capital, startup, or operating costs to respondents for participation in the project. No equipment, printing, or postage charges will be incurred. **A.14 Annualized Cost to the Federal Government**  Estimated costs to the federal government for HSLS:09 are shown in Exhibit s A - 4 a and A - 4 b . The estimated costs to the government for data collection for the field test are presented separatel y. Included in the contract estimates are all staff time, reproduction, postage, and telephone costs associated with the management, data collection, analy sis, and reporting for which clearance is requested. **Exhibit A -**  **4 a**  **. Total Costs to NCES**  **Costs to NCES Am**  **ount Total HSLS:09 s**  **econd f**  **ollow -**  **up costs** $16,755,907 Salaries and expenses $300,000 Contract costs $16,455,907 **Field test (2015)** $2,435,026 Salaries and expenses $150,000 Contract costs $ 2,285,026 **Main study (2016)** $14,320,881 Salaries and expenses $150,000 Contract costs $ 14,170,881 NOTE: Field test costs represent Task 3 and two - fifths of Task 1 (representing two of the five years of the contract). O f the HSLS:09 contract; base - year main study costs include task s 2, 4, 5, 6, and three - fifths of Task 1 . **Exhibit A -**  **4 b.**  **Total Contract Costs** Task 1 - Management $ 1,367,965 Task 2 - Panel Maintenance for HSL S: 09 Second Follow - Up $ 569,092 Task 3 - Field Test (FT) $ 1,737,840 Task 4

– Main Study Data Collection $ 6,759,209 Task 5 - Student Financial Aid Records Collection $ 2,218,028 Task 6 - Postsecondary

Transcript Collection $ 3,803,773 Total $ 16,455,907 **A.15 Reasons for Program Changes**  The apparent de crease in respondent burden for this collection is due to the fact that the last OMB approval was for the main study high school transc ript collection and 2013 update, while this request is for the second follow - up field test and only panel maintenance activities for the main study .A. Justification Supporting Statement Request for OMB Review (SF83I)

26 **A.16 Publication Plans and Project Schedule**  The formal contract for HSL S:09 requires the following reports, publications, or other public information releases:  Descrip tive summaries of significant findings for dissemination to a broad audience;  Detailed data file documentation describing all aspects of the main study design and data collection procedures, including an appendix summarizing the methodological findings fro m the field test;  Complete data files and documentation for research data users in the form of both restricted- use and a public - use data files;  Special tabulations of issues of interest to the higher education community , as determined b y NCES. The operatio nal schedule for the HSL S:09 Second Follow - up field test is shown in Exhibit A - 5 . **Exhibit A**  **- 5**  **.**

 **Operational Schedule for HSLS:09 Second Follow**  **- up Field Test**  **HSLS:09 activity Start date**  **End date Field Test (FT) Data Collection**  **7/1/2014 8/28/2015**  FT Instrument Development and System Support 7/1/2014 3/6/2015 FT Cognitive Interviews 11/26/2014 3/6/2015 FT Web/CATI Training 12/8/2014 4/9/2015 Conduct FT Tracing 1/12/2015 7/30/2015 FT Data Files 4/13/2015 8/28/2015 FT Reporting 5/26/2015 3/7/2016 Responsive Design Experiment tbd 8/31/2015 **Second Follow -**  **up Main Study (MS) Data Collection 11/26/2014**  **11/30/2018** OMB review of MS package 09/15/2015 -- MS Instrument Development and System Support 3/9/2015 1/26/2016 OMB review of Cognitive Testing request 3/15/2015 -- MS Data Elements and Justifications 4/22/2015 10/15/2015 MS Cognitive Testing 5/15/2015 7/15/2015 Panel Maintenance 7/10/2015 12/31/2015 MS Sampling 7/30/2015 11/11/2015 Develop Training Materials 11/30/2015 6/13/2016 MS CATI Training 11/30/2015 9/23/2016 MS Locating/Tracing Plan 12/29/2015 2/1/2016 Deliver MS item wording list 1/19/2016 3/21/2016 MS Tracing 2/29/2016 10/27/2016 MS Web/CATI Data Collection 3/28/2016 12/31/2016 MS CAPI Training 5/10/2016 8/26/2016 MS CAPI Data Collection 6/20/2016 11/30/2016 Student Financial Aid Records Collection 10/26/2016 12/29/2017 Postsecondary Transcript Collection 10/26/2016 12/29/2017 MS Data Collection Products 11/30/2016 12/29/2017 Student Financial Aid Records Products 10/12/2017 11/30/2018Supporting Statement Request for OMB Review (SF83I) A. Justification

27 Postsecondary Transcript Products 10/12/2017 11/30/2018 Additional Panel Maintenance 1/1/2018 6/30/2018 **A.17 Reason(s) Display of OMB Expiration Date Is Inappropriate**  The expiration date for OMB approval of the information collection will be displayed on data collection instruments and materials. No special exception to this requirement is requested. **A.18 Exceptions to Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Statement**  There are no exceptions to the certification statement identified in the Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions of OMB Form 83 - I.