alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010246EN.01003601.xml

| 11.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/36

---

Order of the General Court of 14 July 2010 — Grupo Osborne v OHIM — Confecciones Sanfertús (TORO)

(Case T-165/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of opposition - No need to adjudicate)

2010/C 246/61

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Grupo Osborne, SA (El Puerto de Santa María, Spain) (represented by: J. M. Iglesias Monravá, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: D. Botis, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Confecciones Sanfertús, SL (Graus, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 January 2010 (Case R 638/2009-2), concerning opposition proceedings between Confecciones Sanfertús, SL and Grupo Osborne, SA.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | The applicant shall bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The applicant shall bear the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 148, 5.6.2010.

1

---
#### § 93.321 Import permits and applications for inspection for horses.

For horses intended for importation into the United States from Mexico, the importer or his or her agent shall deliver to the veterinary inspector at the port of entry an application, in writing, for inspection, so that the veterinary inspector and customs representatives may make mutually satisfactory arrangements for the orderly inspection of the horses. The veterinary inspector at the port of entry will provide the importer or his or her agent with a written statement assigning a date when the horses may be presented for import inspection. Horses quarantined at a U.S. facility designated in § 93.303 must obtain an import permit under § 93.304.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0485)

[55 FR 31495, Aug. 2, 1990, as amended at 88 FR 63004, Sept. 14, 2023]
### SUBCHAPTER I—NATIONAL QUANTUM INITIATIVE
<PAGE>   1

                                                                     EXHIBIT 23

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



         We consent to the incorporation by reference in (i) Registration
         Statement No. 33-73900 of Roberds, Inc. on Form S-8, (ii) Registration
         Statement No. 33-81086 of Roberds, Inc. on Form S-8, (iii)
         Registration Statement No. 33-79182 of Roberds, Inc. on Form S-8, (iv)
         Registration Statement No. 33-97262, of Roberds, Inc. on Form S-8, (v)
         Registration Statement No. 333-19903 of Roberds, Inc. on Form S-8 (vi)
         Registration Statement No. 333-43977 of Roberds, Inc. on Form S-8 and
         (vii) Registration Statement No. 333-37829 of Roberds, Inc. on Form
         S-8 of our report dated February 26, 1999 on the Roberds, Inc.
         Employee Stock Purchase Plan appearing in this Amendment Number 1 to
         the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Roberds, Inc. for the year ended
         December 31, 1998, which expressed an unqualified opinion and includes
         an explanatory paragraph describing matters regarding Roberds, Inc.,
         the Plan's sponsor.


         /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

         DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 
         Dayton, Ohio 
         March 19, 1999


                                       1
# C_2007095EN.01005001.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/50

---

Appeal brought on 28 February 2007 by the Commission of the European Communities against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 13 December 2006 in Case F-17/05 de Brito Sequeira Carbalho v Commission

(Case T-62/07 P)

(2007/C 95/100)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: D. Martin, Agent, and C. Falmagne, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: José Antonio de Brito Sequeira Carvalho

Other party to the proceedings:

Form of order sought by the appellant

| — | Set aside the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 13 December 2006 in Case F-17/05; |
| --- | --- |

—

Set aside the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 13 December 2006 in Case F-17/05;

| — | dismiss the action brought by Mr Sequeira; |
| --- | --- |

—

dismiss the action brought by Mr Sequeira;

| — | order each of the parties to bear its own costs relating to these proceedings and the proceedings before the Civil Service Tribunal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order each of the parties to bear its own costs relating to these proceedings and the proceedings before the Civil Service Tribunal.

Pleas in law and main arguments

By its judgment of 13 December 2006 in Case F-17/05 de Brito Sequeira Carvalho v Commission, the Civil Service Tribunal (CST) upheld in part the action brought by the applicant at first instance and annulled the Commission decision of 13 July 2004 prohibiting the applicant's access to its buildings and the decisions automatically extending his sick leave.

de Brito Sequeira Carvalho

Commission

The Commission bases the appeal, first, on the fact that the Tribunal adjudicated ultra petita by annulling the Commission decision of 13 July 2004 prohibiting the applicant's access to its buildings and, second, on the fact that the judgment under appeal infringed Community law. The Commission claims that the Tribunal distorted the facts of the case, that it erred in law in interpreting the obligation to state the reasons on which a decision is based and that it infringed the fifth subparagraph of Article 59(1) of the Staff Regulations. The Commission further maintains that by the interpretation in the judgment of Article 59(5) of the Staff Regulations, the Tribunal distorted the arbitration procedure provided for in that provision.

ultra petita

---
# C_2011319EN.01002101.xml

| 29.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 319/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 319/21

---

Order of the General Court of 1 September 2011 — Communauté de communes de Lacq v Commission

(Case T-132/10) (1)

1

(Non-contractual liability - Concentration - Commission decision declaring compatible the concentration operation for the acquisition of control of Acetex Corp by Celanese Corp. - No undertaking by Celanese to continue the operation of the factory in Pardies (France) - No breach of a rule of law by the Commission - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

2011/C 319/44

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Communauté de communes de Lacq (Mourenx, France) (represented by: J. Daniel, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Van Nuffel and N. von Lingen, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Claim for compensation for various kinds of harm allegedly suffered by the Communauté de communes de Lacq by reason of unlawfulness and deficiency of the Commission’s behaviour following the concentration operation involving the acquisition of control of Acetex Corp. situated in Pardies (France) by Celanese Corp.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as partially devoid of any foundation in law and as partially manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as partially devoid of any foundation in law and as partially manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | The Communauté de communes de Lacq is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Communauté de communes de Lacq is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 148, 5.6.2010.

1

---
Exhibit 23.2



            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (Nos. 333-92326, 333-117148 and 333-118728) of Motient Corporation and
Subsidiaries of our report dated April 23, 2004 with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of Mobile Satellite Ventures LP and subsidiaries, included
in this Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended December 31, 2003.


                                        /s/ ERNST & YOUNG
                                        -----------------
McLean, Virginia
May 23, 2005
#### § 319.107 Bacon.

The weight of cured pork bellies ready for slicing and labeling as “Bacon” shall not exceed the weight of the fresh uncured pork bellies.

[49 FR 14880, Apr. 13, 1984]
### §1141i. Effect of extension of protection

#### (a) Issuance of extension of protection

Unless a request for extension of protection is refused under section 1141h of this title, the Director shall issue a certificate of extension of protection pursuant to the request and shall cause notice of such certificate of extension of protection to be published in the Official Gazette of the United States Patent and Trademark Office.

#### (b) Effect of extension of protection

From the date on which a certificate of extension of protection is issued under subsection (a)—

(1) such extension of protection shall have the same effect and validity as a registration on the Principal Register; and

(2) the holder of the international registration shall have the same rights and remedies as the owner of a registration on the Principal Register.

(July 5, 1946, ch. 540, title XII, §69, as added Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title III, §13402, Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1918.)
Development of Chemical Precipitation Purchased Equipment 

Costs: Tanks 

 

 

This telecon supports EPA’s development of tank purchased equipment cost equation by providing freight cost 

information for FRP tanks used in the Steam Electric cost model. 
Project No.: 0172.08.029.044 DISTRIBUTION 

Page _1_ of __1_

Project Name: Steam/Cost/Compliance Modeling 

TELEPHONE CALL RECORD 

 Outgoing Call

Date: 05/05/2011 Time: 3:00 pm EST 

Company Name: Augusta Fiberglass 

 

Contact Name: Ryan West 

Phone No : (803) 284-2246 

Name: Kavya Kasturi ERG 

GENERAL SUBJECT: Vendor freight cost request for tanks for a chemical precipitation wastewater treatment system. 

 

TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN 

On May 5, 2011 at 3:00 pm I contacted Augusta Fiberglass to obtain freight costs for tanks needed for chemical 

precipitation wastewater treatment systems for FGD wastewater as discussed during a previous call. Mr. 

Hawkins was not available so I was directed to Mr. Ryan West. 

Mr. West provided the following costs per mile for tanks of equivalent height and diameter: 

Tank Diameter & Height, ft Freight Cost per Mile, $

8 or smaller $ 3.50 

10 $ 5.00 

12 $ 7.50 

14 $ 10.00 

Mr. West stated that the 12’x12’ tank would hold approximately 10,000 gallons and weigh approximately 3,500 

lbs. 

For larger tanks up to 42 feet, the tanks could be oblated to a smaller size for shipping. Mr. West stated that a 

42’ diameter tank could be oblated to 14’. The 42’ diameter tank would then require shipping as three legal 

loads (each equivalent to an 8’ diameter tank) and two to three big loads (each equivalent to a 14’ diameter 

tank). 

Mr. West stated that the 42’ tank would hold approximately 10,000 gallons per foot of height.
# C_2011347EN.01003001.xml

| 26.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 347/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 347/30

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 October 2011 — Association belge des consommateurs test-achats v Commission

(Case T-224/10) (1)

1

(Competition - Concentrations - Belgian energy market - Decision declaring a merger to be compatible with the common market - Commitments given during the initial phase of the investigation - Decision refusing the partial referral of the merger investigation to the national authorities - Action for annulment - Consumer association - Interest in bringing proceedings - Failure to initiate the in-depth review procedure - Procedural rights - Inadmissibility)

2011/C 347/48

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Association belge des consommateurs test-achats ASBL (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: A. Fratini and F. Filpo, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: N. Khan, A. Antoniadis and R. Sauer, Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Électricité de France (EDF), (Paris, France), (represented initially by C. Lazarus, A. Amsellem and A. Fontanille, and subsequently by C. Lazarus and A. Creus Carreras, lawyers)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

APPLICATION for annulment of Commission Decisions C(2009) 9059 and C(2009) 8954 of 12 November 2009, the former declaring a merger to be compatible with the common market (Case COMP/M.5549 — EDF/Segebel) under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (OJ 2004 L 24, p. 1), and the latter rejecting a request from the Belgian competition authorities for partial referral of the case in accordance with Article 9 of that regulation.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action as inadmissible;

| 2. | Orders the Association belge des consommateurs test-achats ASBL to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Association belge des consommateurs test-achats ASBL to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders Électricité de France (EDF) to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Électricité de France (EDF) to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 209, 31.7.2010.

1

---
#### § 354.72 Packaging.

No container which bears or may bear any official identification or any abbreviation or copy or representation thereof may be filled in whole or in part except with edible products which were inspected and certified and are, at the time of such filing, sound, wholesome, and fit for human food. All such filling of containers shall be under the supervision of an inspector.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999

Commission File Number: 33-92146

American Southwest Financial Securities Corporation issuer in
respect of Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
Series 1996-FHA1
(Exact Name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware      			0742739
(State or Other Juris-		(I.R.S. Employer
diction of Incorporation)     Identification No.)

2390 Camelback Road Suite 223, Phoenix, AZ 85016
(Address of Principal Executive Office)

212-526-5594
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:     None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:     None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed  by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to
file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes  X   No _

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein,
and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's
knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K.

Not applicable.

Aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of
the Registrant as of December 31, 1999.

Not applicable.

Number of shares of common stock outstanding as of December 31,
1999.

Not applicable.
# C_2011282EN.01002001.xml

| 24.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/20

---

Order of the General Court of 15 July 2011 — Marcuccio v Commission

(Case T-366/10 P) (1)

1

(Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Non-contractual liability - Reimbursement of recoverable costs - Exception for parallel proceedings - Procedural defects - Rights of the defence - Appeal partly manifestly inadmissible and partly manifestly unfounded)

2011/C 282/39

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Curral and C. Berardis-Kayser, agents, assisted by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (First Chamber) of 22 June 2010 in Case F-78/09 Marcuccio v Commission, not yet published in the ECR, and seeking to annul that order.

Marcuccio

Commission

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed;

| 2. | Mr Luigi Marcuccio is to bear his own costs and those incurred by the European Commission in the present proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Luigi Marcuccio is to bear his own costs and those incurred by the European Commission in the present proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 288, 23.10.2010.

1

---
Skip Navigation

#         Archive-It      

Login

      - HOME
      - EXPLORE
      - LEARN MORE
      - CONTACT US

### The leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing cultural heritage on the web 

Built at the Internet Archive

## Video Player

Archive It

#### Archive-It 

*Built at the Internet Archive*
2014 Archive-ItThe leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing  cultural heritage on the web 

      - Home
      - Learn More         - About Archive-It
        - News/Press
        - Meet the Team
        - Publications
      - Contact Us
TRANSFER
TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL CORP.




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Transfer Technology International Corp.
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Robert J. Calamunci, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)The Report
      fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and





(2)The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




/s/
      Robert J. CalamunciRobert
      J. CalamunciChief
      Financial Officer
              Chief
      Accounting OfficerAugust
      18, 2009




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Transfer Technology International Corp. and will be retained by
Transfer Technology International Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2007096EN.01001702.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/17

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 April 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-264/06) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 - Article 16(3) - Compensation and assistance to passengers - Measures necessary)

(2007/C 96/29)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: D. Maidani and R. Vidal Puig, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (represented by: C. Schiltz)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to adopt the measures necessary to comply with Article 16(3) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1) — Adoption of effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by not laying down sanctions for infringements of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 16(3) of that regulation; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by not laying down sanctions for infringements of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 16(3) of that regulation;

| 2. | Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 190, 12.8.2006.

1

---
###### Editorial Note on Part 113

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 113 appear at 79 FR 55969, Sept. 18, 2014.

#### §§ 113.201-113.203 [Reserved]
#### Gluchowski *v.*Standard Steel Car Company.

[No. 12,373.

Filed July 1, 1925.]

From Industrial Board of Indiana.

Proceeding under the Workmen’s Compensation Act by Bole-slaw Gluchowski against the Standard Steel Car Company. From the decision of the board, the former appeals. *Appeal dismissed.*By the court in banc.

*Dominic P. Sevald,*for appellant.

*Turner, Adams, Merrell & Locke,*for appellee.

Remy, C. J.

Dismissed on authority of *Thompson*v. *A. J. Thompson Stone Co.*(1924), 81 Ind. App. 442, 144 N. E. 150.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

it,tate5 Court of pi at

for tbe ffeberat Circuit

SHAWANDA R. MURRY,

Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,

Respondent.

2010-3117

Petition for review of the Merits Systems Protection

Board in case no. AT1221100381-W-1.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Shawanda R. Murry moves for this court to direct the

Department of Justice to provide her certain documents

and also moves for an extension of time to file her informal brief. The Department of Justice (DOJ) responds.

DOJ states that it has provided to Murry the documents she requests.

Accordingly,

IT Is ORDERED THAT:
MURRY v. JUSTICE 2

The motion to direct DOJ to provide documents is

moot.

The motion for an extension of time is granted.

Murry's informal brief is due within 45 days from the date

of filing of this order.

FOR THE C OURT

JUL 2 7 2010 

Date

cc: Shawanda R. Murry

Jeffrey D. Klingman, Esq.

s19

/s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly

Clerk

FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR

THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

JUL 2 7 1010

JAN HORBALY

CLERK