alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
USDA Rural Health Liaison

The USDA Rural Health Liaison (RHL) position was created by Congress in the 2018 Farm Bill to

enhance USDA’s efforts to support rural health. USDA RHL Kellie Kubena cultivates relationships

across USDA, with other federal agencies, and with external partners to gather information and

resources to promote department-wide efforts to address rural America's health care needs.

FOUR WAYS THE RHL SUPPORTED RURAL HEALTH IN 2023 

Facilitated the development and coordination of tools and shared

resources to support rural communities.

We created or shared information regarding: 

Nearly 160 USDA rural health programs 

Data and mapping tools like the Rural Emergency Health Care Grants Story Map

(Information at this link: tinyurl.com/bd2yv6db)

The Rural Health Care Fact Sheet 

 (Information at this link: tinyurl.com/2a9s3c4a -PDF)

National Rural Health Day events (Information at this link: tinyurl.com/57vmfk5k)

Mental health awareness events (Information at this link: tinyurl.com/yfsn3he9)

Various other resource guides and toolkits 

 (Information at this link: tinyurl.com/3d2mdxav)

Assisted with rural health outreach, including supporting presentations

and finding the right subject matter experts. 

The RHL participated in nearly 50 speaking engagements at federal, national,

regional, and state levels, covering health topics such as:

Rural mental health and farm stress

Rural community economic development 

Food and nutrition security 

Rural health care, telemedicine, and public health 

National Rural Health Day commemoration webinars

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender. 
Collaborated with 45 federal and private partners, and made 35 new

connections to promote health advocacy and equity in rural America.

Collaborations:

Federal partners focused on:

Health care availability 

Economic development 

Justice 

Social determinants of health

Non-federal partners included: 

Nonprofit and philanthropic

organizations

Academic institutions and technical

assistance providers

Health-focused associations

New connections:

Federal partners focused on:

Research

Nutrition security

Health and recreation

Non-federal partners included: 

Healthcare facilities

Farm and rancher health

Federally Qualified Health Centers

Academic and research institutions

Private companies

State departments of agriculture, other

state offices, and rural health offices

Hospital associations

Health education organizations

Participated in interagency working groups to develop health-related

strategies and policies. Results include:

Social Determinants of Health Playbook

 (Information at this link: tinyurl.com/msw5b6t7 - PDF)

Fentanyl Adulterated with Xylazine Response Strategy

 (Information at this link: tinyurl.com/57v7huys - PDF)

2024 National Drug Control Strategy 

 (Information at this link: tinyurl.com/3w3c965k)

RD-F2403. Last revised Feb 2024
#### § 1.12 Penalties.

Any person who makes a false statement in connection with any request for a record, or an amendment or correction thereto, under this part, is subject to the penalties prescribed in 18 U.S.C. 494 and 495.
#### § 550.7 Reports by consignees of allegedly adulterated or misbranded products; sale or transportation as violations.

The requirements in 9 CFR 320.7 for reports by consignees of allegedly adulterated or misbranded products apply with respect to fish and fish products as they do with respect to products of other species amenable to the Act.
### §717. Agreements

(a) In General.—In carrying out section 504(a)(4), the Commandant may—

(1) enter into cooperative agreements, contracts, and other agreements with—

(A) Federal entities;

(B) other public or private entities in the United States, including academic entities; and

(C) foreign governments with the concurrence of the Secretary of State; and

(2) impose on and collect from an entity subject to an agreement or contract under paragraph (1) a fee to assist with expenses incurred in carrying out such section.

(b) Deposit and Use of Fees.—Fees collected under this section shall be deposited in the general fund of the Treasury as offsetting receipts. The fees may be used, to the extent provided in advance in an appropriation law, only to carry out activities under section 504(a)(4).

(Added Pub. L. 113–281, title II, §206(b), Dec. 18, 2014, 128 Stat. 3025, §102; renumbered §717 and amended Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §§106(b), 123(b)(2), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4203, 4240.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282, §106(b), renumbered section 102 of this title as this section.

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 115–282, §123(b)(2), substituted "section 504(a)(4)" for "section 93(a)(4)" in introductory provisions.

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 115–282, §123(b)(2), substituted "section 504(a)(4)" for "section 93(a)(4)".
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED November 9, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-41514 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus HECTOR MANUEL VILLA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:04-CR-273-1

-------------------- Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Hector Manuel Villa appeals from his sentence imposed following his guilty plea to possession with intent to distribute more than 1,000 kilograms of marijuana. Villa contends that he was sentenced in violation of United States v. Booker , 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005), when his sentence was enhanced for possession of a dangerous weapon and his role in the offense. Villa also contends that his sentence is unconstitutional because he was sentenced pursuant to the mandatory Sentencing Guidelines regime.No. 04-41514 -2- The district court, however, opined that if the Guidelines were held unconstitutional, it would impose the same sentence. Therefore, the Government has carried its burden of establishing that the sentencing errors suffered by Villa were harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. See United States v. Walters , 418 F.3d 461, 464 (5th Cir. 2005); United States v. Akpan , 407 F.3d 360, 376 (5th Cir. 2005); see also United States v. Martinez-Lugo , 411 F.3d 597, 601 (5th Cir. 2005), cert. denied , S. Ct. (Oct. 11, 2005) (No. 05-6242).
AFFIRMED.
# C_2010328EN.01006102.xml

| 4.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/61

---

Action brought on 28 September 2010 — Bovagnet v Commission

(Case F-89/10)

()

2010/C 328/99

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: François-Carlos Bovagnet (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: M. Korving, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the defendant’s decision not to reimburse fully the education costs in respect of the applicant’s children

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Uphold the applicant’s complaint and grant him full reimbursement of all the disputed invoices relating to the school year 2009/2010, namely, payment of the sum of EUR 2 580 by the PMO; |
| --- | --- |

—

Uphold the applicant’s complaint and grant him full reimbursement of all the disputed invoices relating to the school year 2009/2010, namely, payment of the sum of EUR 2 580 by the PMO;

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
#### § 590.130 Basis of billing plants.

Overtime and/or holiday services shall be billed to the official plant on the basis of each 15 minutes of overtime and/or holiday service performed by each inspector providing such service to the plant, except that when an official plant requires the services of an inspector after he has completed his day's assignment and left the plant or when he is called back to duty on a day outside the established normal operating schedule or on a holiday, the official plant shall pay for a minimum of 2 hours service at the applicable established rate. Extra travel expense incurred while rendering overtime or holiday service shall be billed to the official plant. Bills are payable upon receipt and become delinquent 30 days from date of billing. Overtime or holiday inspection service will not be performed at any plant that is delinquent, and processing operations shall be confined to the regular operating schedule of the plant. In addition, fees will be charged and collected for certifications requested by and provided for the official plant that are not within the scope of these regulations.

[36 FR 9814, May 28, 1971. Redesignated at 42 FR 32514, June 27, 1977, and further redesignated at 46 FR 63203, Dec. 31, 1981, as amended at 60 FR 49169, Sept. 21, 1995; 65 FR 44950, July 20, 2000]
CERITIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC SECTION 1350
 
 
 
  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 CERTIFICATION OF CUSTODIAN
  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Oasis Entertainments Fourth Movie Project, Inc. , a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on 10-QSB for the June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Luke C. Zouvas, Custodian of the Company, certify, pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:
  
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/Luke C. Zouvas
Luke C. Zouvas
Custodian
 August 11, 2003
OXg

RNY = % WALLA Bo
\y A \
2a RAVES

Ae 4 &
1 K] V
Aries ts >|

29"00 ape RS ‘ y ‘ {Bho EX jE \\
Cs Si te \ . on x hh 0)
ois A ®&
Sa i <6

.

\
%
(>
ne
S

Z}

OARS Se , V | Ye wy Yl
0
Wiis CEPA fi PIA Ly o WM
(aa U0 ) y BA) Wl, y
a BYE. ) f
ee oh tg
f “ ? yj is i ] Ys zs ; :
1 Lh yy KY
wD

@90'eorrs

BATHYMETRIC CONTOUR INTERVAL 2 METERS
WITH SUPPLEMENTARY | METER CONTOURS

DATUM IS MEAN LOW WATER
TITUSVILLE, FLORIDA SEO hs
=o

Trrasviele, Ft. *FF
§ 316.4 Marking devices; to be furnished by official establishments; control of. ( a ) The operator of each official establishment or official import inspection establishment shall furnish such ink brands, burning brands, and any other device for marking products with official marks as the Administrator may determine is necessary for marking products at such establishment. The official inspection legend on such a device shall be as prescribed in part 312 of this subchapter.
( b ) All official devices for marking products with the official inspection legend, or other official inspection marks, including self-locking seals, shall be used only under supervision of a Program employee, and, when not in use for marking shall be kept locked in properly equipped locks or compartments, the keys of which shall not leave the possession of a Program employee, or the locker or compartment shall be sealed with an official seal of the Department as prescribed in part 312 of this subchapter.
[35 FR 15577, Oct. 3, 1970, as amended at 36 FR 12004, June 24, 1971; 46 FR 38072, July 24, 1981]
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Fiscal year ... Freedom ofInformation Act annual report.**
 
SuDoc Number:OP 1.1/2:
Item Number:0834-W-07 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000602291
 
1997 | 1998 | 1999
2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009
2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013| 2014 | 2015| 2016 | 2017| 2018
 
March 2, 2020
### §5016. Statistical reporting of costs and revenues for transporting checks between reserve banks

In the annual report prepared by the Board for the first full calendar year after October 28, 2003, and in each of the 9 subsequent annual reports by the Board, the Board shall include the amount of operating costs attributable to, and an estimate of the Federal Reserve banks' imputed revenues derived from, the transportation of commercial checks between Federal Reserve bank check processing centers.

(Pub. L. 108–100, §17, Oct. 28, 2003, 117 Stat. 1191.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective at the end of the 12-month period beginning on Oct. 28, 2003, see section 20 of Pub. L. 108–100, set out as a note under section 5001 of this title.
# C_2011013EN.01004302.xml

| 15.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/43

---

Action brought on 29 October 2010 — Couyoufa v Commission

(Case F-110/10)

()

2011/C 13/87

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Denise Couyoufa (Athens, Greece) (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the defendant’s decision rejecting the applicant’s application for exemption from the mandatory staff rotation.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that the decision of 31 July 2008 is vitiated by illegality; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that the decision of 31 July 2008 is vitiated by illegality;

| — | Annul the decision of 26 February 2010 rejecting Ms Couyoufa’s application; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of 26 February 2010 rejecting Ms Couyoufa’s application;

| — | Annul the decision rejecting her appeal against that decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision rejecting her appeal against that decision;

| — | Order the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the European Commission to pay the costs.

---
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

________________

NO. 09-19-00001-CR

________________

LONNIE LEE BLYTHE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 252nd District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 18-28620

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On November 19, 2018, the trial court sentenced Lonnie Lee Blythe1 on a 

conviction for possession of a controlled substance. Blythe filed a notice of appeal 

on December 18, 2018. The district clerk has provided the trial court’s certification 

to the Court of Appeals. The trial court certified that this is a plea-bargain case and 

the defendant has no right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).

 1

The trial court’s judgment identifies Blythe as Lonnie Lee Blythe a/k/a 

Linnie Lee Blythe Jr. a/k/a Lonnie Blythe.
2

On January 2, 2019, we notified the parties that we would dismiss the appeal 

unless Blythe established grounds for continuing the appeal. No response has been 

filed. Because the record does not contain a certification that shows the defendant 

has the right of appeal, we must dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

________________________________ 

 STEVE McKEITHEN

Chief Justice 

Submitted on January 29, 2019

Opinion Delivered January 30, 2019

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DORIAN MILLER,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 405 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 29th day of January, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
#### STATE v. RICHARDSON

No. 17P90

Case below: 96 N.C.App. 515

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 10 May 1990. Motion by defendant to amend petition allowed 10 May 1990.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  MAY-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                          $        16
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                         1,426
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          0
<PP&E>                                    0
<DEPRECIATION>                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        1,442
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    57
<BONDS>                               1,385
<COMMON>                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          1,442
<SALES>                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          0
<CGS>                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           0
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                              0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                          0.00
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.23


SUMMARY OF ORAL AGREEMENTS BETWEEN CARACO AND
SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN RAW MATERIALS AND
FORMULATIONS AND THE ACQUISITION OF MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT 


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
1.

	
          Caraco
  has agreed that it will attempt to obtain raw materials (primarily active
  pharmaceutical ingredients) related to its products from Sun Pharma and its
  affiliates, and Sun Pharma and its affiliates have agreed to provide such raw
  materials and formulations to Caraco to the extent they can on terms not
  materially less favorable in the aggregate than would be usual and customary
  in similar transactions between unrelated parties dealing at arm’s length.
  The products manufactured by Caraco change over time as certain products may
  be discontinued and new products added. The raw materials obtained by Caraco
  from Sun Pharma and its affiliates change from time to time in accordance
  with competitive, economic and market conditions. There is no agreement
  between Caraco and Sun Pharma and its affiliates to exclusively purchase or
  exclusively supply, respectively, any raw materials. Each party is free to
  purchase from or supply, respectively, raw materials from other sources.
  There is no fixed term in any agreement to purchase or supply any raw material,
  and any agreement may be terminated at any time.


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
2.

	
          Caraco
  uses Sun Pharma and its affiliates to procure certain equipment and machinery
  when it is financially beneficial to Caraco to do so. Sun Pharma and its
  affiliates have agreed to provide such machinery and equipment to Caraco at
  their cost therefore.
§ 3.31 Sanitation. ( a ) *Cleaning and sanitation of primary enclosures.* ( 1 ) Primary enclosures shall be cleaned and sanitized often enough to prevent an accumulation of excreta or debris: *Provided, however,* That such enclosures shall be sanitized at least once every 2 weeks in the manner provided in paragraph (a)(4) of this section.
( 2 ) In the event a primary enclosure becomes soiled or wet to a degree that might be harmful or uncomfortable to the animals therein due to leakage of the watering system, discharges from dead or dying animals, spoiled perishable foods, or moisture condensation, the guinea pigs or hamsters shall be transferred to clean primary enclosures.
( 3 ) Prior to the introduction of guinea pigs or hamsters into empty primary enclosures previously occupied, such enclosures shall be sanitized in the manner provided in paragraph (a)(4) of this section.
( 4 ) Primary enclosures for guinea pigs or hamsters shall be sanitized by washing them with hot water (180 °F.) and soap or detergent as in a mechanical cage washer, or by washing all soiled surfaces with a detergent solution followed by a safe and effective disinfectant, or by cleaning all soiled surfaces with live steam.
( b ) *Housekeeping.* Premises (buildings and grounds) shall be kept clean and in good repair in order to protect the animals from injury and to facilitate the prescribed husbandry practices set forth in this subpart. Premises shall remain free of accumulations of trash.
( c ) *Pest control.* An effective program for the control of insects, ectoparasites, and avian and mammalian pests shall be established and maintained.
§ 354.46 Misrepresentation; deceptive or fraudulent acts or practices. Any willful misrepresentation or any deceptive or fraudulent act or practice made or committed by any person in connection with: ( a ) The making or filing of any application for any inspection service;
( b ) The making of the product accessible for inspection;
( c ) The making, issuing, or using, or attempting to issue or use any inspection certificate, symbol, stamp, label, seal or identification, authorized pursuant to the regulations in this part;
( d ) The use of the terms “U.S. Inspected” or “Government Inspected”, or any term of similar import in the labeling or advertising of any product.
Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARIES
OF
FINANCIAL SECURITY ASSURANCE HOLDINGS LTD.

Financial
Security Assurance Inc. (incorporated in the State of New York)
FSA Insurance Company (incorporated in the State of Oklahoma)
Financial Security Assurance International Ltd. (incorporated in Bermuda)
Financial Security Assurance (U.K.) Limited (incorporated in the United Kingdom)
Transaction Services Corp. (incorporated in the State of New York)
FSA Portfolio Management Inc. (incorporated in the State of New York)
FSA Capital Markets Services LLC (organized in the State of Delaware)
FSA Capital Management Services LLC (organized in the State of Delaware)
FSA Asset Management Services LLC (organized in the State of Delaware)

---

QuickLinks