alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010209EN.01001202.xml

| 31.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/12

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 26 April 2010 — Vion Trading GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas

(Case C-202/10)

()

2010/C 209/19

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Finanzgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Vion Trading GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Is the application by analogy of the limitation rule in Paragraph 195 BGB, in the version in force until the end of 2001, to claims for the repayment of wrongly paid export refunds incompatible with the Community-law principle of legal certainty? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is the application by analogy of the limitation rule in Paragraph 195 BGB, in the version in force until the end of 2001, to claims for the repayment of wrongly paid export refunds incompatible with the Community-law principle of legal certainty?

| 2. | Is the application of the 30-year limitation period in Paragraph 195 BGB in relation to the recovery of wrongly paid export refunds incompatible with the Community-law principle of proportionality? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is the application of the 30-year limitation period in Paragraph 195 BGB in relation to the recovery of wrongly paid export refunds incompatible with the Community-law principle of proportionality?

| 3. | If the reply to the second question is in the affirmative, is the application of a longer national limitation period within the meaning of Article 3(3) of Regulation No 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 on the protection of the European Communities’ financial interests, (1) which is determined on the basis of an emergency judicial power in particular cases, by way of judicial development of the law, compatible with the Community-law principle of legal certainty? |
| --- | --- |

3.

If the reply to the second question is in the affirmative, is the application of a longer national limitation period within the meaning of Article 3(3) of Regulation No 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 on the protection of the European Communities’ financial interests, (1) which is determined on the basis of an emergency judicial power in particular cases, by way of judicial development of the law, compatible with the Community-law principle of legal certainty?

1

---

(1)  OJ 1995 L 312, p. 1.

1

---
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Rural Utilities Service 

RUS BULLETIN 1777-3

RD-GD-2012-66

SUBJECT: Section 306C Water and Waste Disposal (WWD) Loans and Grants 

Transmittal Memorandum

TO: RUS Water and Environmental Programs Staff. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: Date of approval. 

OFFICE OF PRIMARY INTEREST: Water and Environmental Programs. 

INSTRUCTIONS: This bulletin replaces previous versions. 

AVAILABILITY: This Bulletin is available on the Internet at

http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/RDU_Bulletins_Water_and_Environmental.html

PURPOSE: To provide a memorandum for requesting funds from the National Office.

_______________________________ __8/21/12_______ JACQUELINE M. PONTI-LAZARUK Date 

Assistant Administrator 

Water and Environmental Programs 

DISCLAIMER: The contents of this guidance document does not have the force and effect of law and is not 

meant to bind the public in any way. This document is intended only to provide clarity to the public regarding 

existing requirements under the law or agency policies. 
Bulletin 1777-3 

Page 2 

1 PURPOSE 

The purpose of this bulletin is to provide a format for requesting funds from the National Office 

for the Section 306C Water and Waste Disposal (WWD) Loan and Grant program. Complete and 

attach Exhibit A of this bulletin to the front of Exhibit A of RUS Bulletin 1777-2 and submit to 

the National Office. 
Bulletin 1777-3 

Exhibit A 

Page 3 

TO: Administrator, RUS 

 Washington, DC 20250 

Attention: Water and Waste 

 STOP: 1570 

State ________________________________________________________________ 

Name of Applicant ________________________________________________________ 

Amount of Section 306C loan funds requested $_____________________________ 

Amount of Section 306C grant funds requested $____________________________ 

The proposed project serves a colonia _______ Yes _______ No 

Comments: 

_____________________________________________________________________________ 

Date State Program Official 

FOR USE BY NATIONAL OFFICE 

State Program Official's Project Score _________________ 

Administrator's Discretionary Points _________________ 

 

Total Project Score _________________
# C_2011030EN.01006503.xml

| 29.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/65 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/65

---

Action brought on 29 October 2010 — Bernaldo de Quirós v Commission

(Case F-111/10)

()

2011/C 30/129

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Belén Bernaldo de Quirós (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the implied decision rejecting the applicant’s note in which she applied to the defendant for the protection provided under Article 22a (3) of the Staff Regulations, and damages.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annulment of the implied decision rejecting the applicant’s request of 1 October 2009 and, if required, of the IDOC letter/decision of 3 November 2009 and of the letter from the Director-General of the Human Resources Directorate General of the European Commission of 22 March 2010; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annulment of the implied decision rejecting the applicant’s request of 1 October 2009 and, if required, of the IDOC letter/decision of 3 November 2009 and of the letter from the Director-General of the Human Resources Directorate General of the European Commission of 22 March 2010;

| — | annulment, as necessary, of the decision dated 3 August 2010 and notified on the following day, 4 August 2010, rejecting her complaint; |
| --- | --- |

—

annulment, as necessary, of the decision dated 3 August 2010 and notified on the following day, 4 August 2010, rejecting her complaint;

Consequently,

| — | That the measures sought in her request of 1 October 2009 be taken by the appointing authority; |
| --- | --- |

—

That the measures sought in her request of 1 October 2009 be taken by the appointing authority;

| — | that, in particular, she be afforded the protection provided in Article 22(a) of the Staff Regulations; |
| --- | --- |

—

that, in particular, she be afforded the protection provided in Article 22(a) of the Staff Regulations;

| — | that the allegations made against the applicant be withdrawn from the notes of 6 May and 30 September 2008 and that the damage suffered by the applicant be compensated by the award of damages; |
| --- | --- |

—

that the allegations made against the applicant be withdrawn from the notes of 6 May and 30 September 2008 and that the damage suffered by the applicant be compensated by the award of damages;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 45 (Tuesday, March 8, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 12692]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5426]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

DATE AND TIME:  Friday, March 11, 2011; 11 a.m.

PLACE:  Office of Cuba Broadcasting Headquarters, 4201 NW. 77th Ave., 
Miami, FL 33166.

SUBJECT:  Notice of Meeting of the Broadcasting Board of Governors.

SUMMARY: The Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG) will be meeting at 
the time and location listed above. In its meeting, the BBG anticipates 
it will: Affirm its 2011 policy statements on sexual harassment and 
equal employment opportunity; consider, among other things, resolutions 
recognizing anniversaries of various broadcasting services; receive a 
budget update, an East Asia trip report, and a report from the Director 
of the International Broadcasting Bureau; receive and consider a report 
from the BBG Strategy and Budget Committee on the status of the current 
regional reviews, including Africa and Latin America; and receive and 
consider a report from the BBG Governance Committee on matters 
pertaining to committee administrative matters, board operations and 
responsibilities, grantee oversight, entity authority, and interaction 
with non-USIB entities. The meeting is open to public observation via 
streamed webcast, both live and on-demand, on the BBG's public Web site 
at http://www.bbg.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Persons interested in obtaining 
more information should contact Paul Kollmer-Dorsey at (202) 203-4545.

Paul Kollmer-Dorsey,
Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2011-5426 Filed 3-4-11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8610-01-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack,

 Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 

November 8, 2019

b1105

Order 

Clerk

November 8, 2019

160222

In re McGEE/SPENCER, Minors. SC: 160222

COA: 347442

Wayne CC Family Div: 

11-501043-NA

________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 13, 2019 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 10.2
                             SUMMARY OF AMENDMENT TO
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
                   BETWEEN THE REGISTRANT AND PETER KATEVATIS

On June 18, 2006, the Board of Directors approved the following amendments to
the Employment Agreement, dated May 1, 1992, between the registrant and its CEO,
Peter Katevatis:

         1.       The termination date was extended from March 5, 2007 to March
                  5, 2015.

         2.       Effective as of March 5, 2007, Mr. Katevatis's base salary was
                  increased from $200,000 per year to $250,000 per year.

         3.       Effective as of August 1, 2006, Mr. Katevatis was to be
                  entitled to a cash bonus of $500,000, to be paid at the rate
                  of $125,000 per year on August 1 of each year from 2006
                  through 2009, subject to the completion of a public offering
                  of the registrant's subsidiary BioScopix yielding proceeds of
                  at least $5,000,000. At Mr. Katevatis's option, such bonus
                  amounts may converted into shares of BioScopix.
#### § 381.68 Maximum inspection rates—New turkey inspection system.

(a) The maximum inspection rates for one inspector New Turkey Inspection (NTI-1 and NTI-1 Modified) and two inspectors New Turkey Inspection (NTI-2 and NTI-2 Modified) are listed in the table below. The line speeds for NTI-1 and NTI-2 are for lines using standard 9-inch shackles on 12-inch centers with birds hung on every shackle and opened with J-type or Bar-type opening cuts. The line speeds for NTI-1 Modified and NTI-2 Modified are for Bar-type cut turkey lines using a shackle with a 4-inch by 4-inch selector (or kickout), a 45 degree bend of the lower 2 inches, an extended central loop portion of the shackle that lowers the abdominal cavity opening of the carcasses to an angle of 30 degrees from the vertical in direct alignment with the inspector's view, and a width of 10.5 inches. Maximum rates for those establishments having varying configurations will be established by the Administrator but will not exceed those in the table. Neither the rates in the table nor those established for establishments with varying configurations shall be exceeded under any circumstances.

(b) There are two categories of turkeys for determining inspection rates, “light turkeys” and “heavy turkeys”. Light turkeys are all turkeys weighing less than 16 pounds. Heavy turkeys are all turkeys weighing 16 pounds or more. The weights refer to the bird at the point of post-mortem inspection, with blood, feathers and feet removed.

(c) The inspector in charge may reduce inspection line rates when in his/her judgment the prescribed inspection procedure cannot be adequately performed within the time available because the health conditions of a particular flock or other factors, including the manner in which birds are being presented to the inspector for inspection and the level of contamination among the birds on the line, dictate a need for a more extended inspection.

Maximum Turkey Inspection Rates

| Inspection system | Line configuration | Number of inspectors | Birds/minute | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| J-Type | | Bar-Type | |
| (<16#) light | (>16#)1 heavy | (<16#) light | (>16#)1 heavy |
| NTI-1 | 12-1 | 1 | 32 | 30 | 25 | 21 |
| NTI-2 | 2 24-2 | 2 | 51 | 41 | 45 | 35 |
| NTI-1 Modified | 12-1 | 1 | — | — | 32 | 30 |
| NTI-2 Modified | 2 24-2 | 2 | — | — | 51 | 41 |
| | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 This weight refers to the bird at the point of post-mortem inspection without blood or feet. | | | | | | |
| 2 The turkeys are suspended on the slaughter line at 12-inch intervals with two inspectors each looking at alternating birds at 24-inch intervals. | | | | | | |

[[50 FR 37512](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/50-FR-37512), Sept. 16, 1985, as amended at [73 FR 51902](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/73-FR-51902), Sept. 8, 2008]
# C_2011319EN.01002102.xml

| 29.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 319/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 319/21

---

Order of the General Court of 31 August 2011 — IEM v Commission

(Case T-435/10) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Fourth framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration - Application for the reimbursement of sums paid in advance under a research financing contract - Arbitration clause - Letter notifying the issuing of a debit note - Reminder letter - Acts inseparable from the contract - Inadmissibility)

2011/C 319/45

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: IEM — Erga — Erevnes — Meletes perivallontos kai chorotaxias AE (Athens, Greece) (represented by: N. Sofokleous, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou and A. Sauka, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action, first, for the annulment of the Commission's letter of 7 May 2010 notifying the applicant of the issuing of a debit note for the reimbursement of the sum of EUR 105 416,47, corresponding to the sums paid in advance to the applicant by Parthénon AE Oikodomikon — Technikon — Touristikon — Viomichanikon — Emporikon kai Exagogikon Ergasion pursuant to Contract FAIR-CT98-9544 concluded in the context of the fourth framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration and, second, for the annulment of the Commission's letter of 14 July 2010 reminding the applicant of the principal outstanding sum, claimed in debit note No 3241004968.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | IEM — Erga — Erevnes — Meletes perivallontos kai chorotaxias AE is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

IEM — Erga — Erevnes — Meletes perivallontos kai chorotaxias AE is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 346, 18.12.2010.

1

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-60268

Summary Calendar

NAAL HAMIDEH-HAMIDEH

Petitioner

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U S ATTORNEY GENERAL

Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A97-909-770

Before DAVIS, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Naal Hamideh-Hamideh, a native of Jordan and a citizen of Brazil,

petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision affirming

without opinion an immigration judge’s decision ordering removal and denial of

voluntary departure. Hamideh-Hamideh has failed to surrender as ordered. He

is now a fugitive.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 4, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-60268

2

Under the fugitive disentitlement doctrine, a fugitive is not entitled to the

review for which he petitioned the court. Giri v. Keisler, 507 F.3d 833, 835-36

(5th Cir. 2007). As Hamideh-Hamideh is a fugitive, his petition for review is

DISMISSED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Balance
Sheet, Statement of operations, Statement of Cash Flows and Notes thereto
incorporated in Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-QSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           2,147
<SECURITIES>                                 2,046,032
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,147
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,048,179
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          329,118
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            3,632
<PREFERRED>                                    630,000
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,085,429
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,048,179
<SALES>                                          9,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                57,565
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (50,565)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (50,565)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (50,565)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)


</TABLE>
ex102to8k03864_06172008.htm


     

     

    Exhibit 10.2

     

     

    
      AMENDMENT
NO. 1 TO

       

      SENIOR
CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE

       

      This
Amendment No. 1 to the Senior Convertible Promissory Note (this “Amendment”) is
made effective as of June 17, 2008 and amends that certain Senior Convertible
Promissory Note dated as of May 19, 2008 (the “Note”) made by QueryObject
Systems Corporation (the “Company”), in favor of BRMR LLC (the
“Holder”).

       

      W I T N E S S E T
H:

       

      WHEREAS,
the interest that has accrued on the Note through the date hereof will be
converted into 1,082,633 shares of common stock of the Company, and accordingly,
upon the issuance of such 1,082,633 shares, there will be no interest due on the
note as of the date hereof; and

       

      WHEREAS,
the Company and the Holder desire to amend the Note as provided
herein;

       

      NOW
THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

       

      The
second sentence of the first paragraph of the Note is hereby amended as
follows:

       

      All
unpaid principal, together with any then unpaid and accrued interest and other
amounts payable hereunder, shall be due and payable on the earlier of (i) May
19, 2009 and (ii) an “Event of Default” (as
hereafter defined) that has not been waived in writing by all “Holders” (as
hereafter defined).

       

      Signature
page follows

       

       

      
        
          
          

        

        
          
          

          
            

          

        

        
          
          

        

      

       

       

      IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 1 to the
Senior Convertible Promissory Note as of the date first written
above.

       

      
        	
                THE
      COMPANY:

              	 
      	
                THE
      HOLDER:

              
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
                QUERYOBJECT
      SYSTEMS

                CORPORATION

              	 
      	
                BRMR
      LLC

              
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
                By:

              	/s/
      Daniel Pess	 
      	
                By:

              	/s/
      Barry Rubenstein
	
                Name:

              	Daniel
      Pess  	 
      	
                Name:

              	Barry
      Rubenstein  
	
                Title:

              	President 
      	 
      	
                Title:

              	Chief
      Executive Officer