alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 2.7 Announcement of meetings and schedule changes. ( a ) ( 1 ) In the case of each meeting, the Commission shall publicly announce and shall submit such announcement for publication in the Federal Register at least seven days prior to the day on which the meeting is to be called to order. The Commission Secretary shall also forward a copy of such announcement for posting in the Commission's Public Records Office.
( 2 ) Announcements made under this section shall contain the following information: ( i ) The date of the meeting;
( ii ) The place of the meeting;
( iii ) The subject matter of the meeting;
( iv ) Whether the meeting is to be open or closed to the public; and
( v ) The name and telephone number of the official designated by the agency to respond to requests for information about the meeting.
( b ) The public announcement and submission for publication shall be made when required by 11 CFR 2.7(a) in the case of every Commission meeting unless a majority of the Commissioners decide by recorded vote that Commission business requires that the meeting be called at an earlier date, in which case the Commission shall make at the earliest practicable time, the announcement required by this section and a concurrent submission for publication of that announcement in the Federal Register.
( c ) The time or place of a meeting may be changed following the public announcement required by 11 CFR 2.7 (a) or (b) only if the Commission announces the change at the earliest practicable time.
( d ) The subject matter of a meeting, or the determination of the Commission to open or close a meeting, or portions of a meeting, to the public may be changed following the public announcement required by 11 CFR 2.7 (a) or (b) only if: ( 1 ) A majority of the entire membership of the Commission determines by recorded vote that Commission business so requires and that no earlier announcement of the change was possible; and
( 2 ) The Commission publicly announces the change and the vote of each member upon the change at the earliest practicable time. Immediately following this announcement, the Commission shall submit for publication in the Federal Register a notice containing the information required by 11 CFR 2.7(a)(2), including a description of any change from the earlier published notice.
Exhibit 10.9f
 
 AMENDMENT NO. 5
TO
SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED LOAN AGREEMENT
 AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED LOAN AGREEMENT Amendment th th NATIONAL DENTEX
CORPORATION Dentex Borrowers BANK OF
AMERICA, N.A. Bank
 WHEREAS Loan Agreement
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS,
 NOW, THEREFORE,
 1. Amendment to Section 4(j) of the Loan Agreement (Consolidated EBITDA) .
  -1-




---



##### 



2. Effective Dates and Conditions to Effectiveness .
 3. Representations and Warranties
     -2-




---



##### 



4. Ratification, etc.
 5. Governing Law .
 6. Delivery By Facsimile Or Other Electronic Transmission
 Counterparts .
 -3-




---



##### 



-4-




---



##### 



NATIONAL DENTEX CORPORATIONBy:
    
    /s/ Richard F. Becker, Jr.Name:
    
    Richard F. Becker, Jr.Title:
    
    Executive Vice President and TreasurerGREEN DENTAL LABORATORIES, INC.,By:
    
    /s/ Richard F. Becker, Jr.Name:
    
    Richard F. Becker, Jr.Title:
    
    Assistant TreasurerKELLER GROUP, INCORPORATEDBy:
    
    /s/ Richard F. Becker, Jr.Name:
    
    Richard F. Becker, Jr.Title:
    
    Assistant Treasurer and Assistant SecretaryKELLER LABORATORIES, INCORPORATED  MIDWESTBy:
    
    /s/ Richard F. Becker, Jr.Name:
    
    Richard F. Becker, Jr.Title:
    
    Assistant Treasurer and Assistant SecretaryKELLER LABORATORIES, INC.  SOUTHEASTBy:
    
    /s/ Richard F. Becker, Jr.Name:
    
    Richard F. Becker, Jr.Title:
    
    Assistant Treasurer and Assistant Secretary




---



##### 



BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,as the BankBy:
    
    /s/ Richard J. MacDonaldName:
    
    Richard J. MacDonaldTitle:
    
    Vice President
§ 3.82 Feeding. ( a ) The diet for nonhuman primates must be appropriate for the species, size, age, and condition of the animal, and for the conditions in which the nonhuman primate is maintained, according to generally accepted professional and husbandry practices and nutritional standards. The food must be clean, wholesome, and palatable to the animals. It must be of sufficient quantity and have sufficient nutritive value to maintain a healthful condition and weight range of the animal and to meet its normal daily nutritional requirements.
( b ) Nonhuman primates must be fed at least once each day except as otherwise might be required to provide adequate veterinary care. Infant and juvenile nonhuman primates must be fed as often as necessary in accordance with generally accepted professional and husbandry practices and nutritional standards, based upon the animals' age and condition.
( c ) Food and food receptacles, if used, must be readily accessible to all the nonhuman primates being fed. If members of dominant nonhuman primate or other species are fed together with other nonhuman primates, multiple feeding sites must be provided. The animals must be observed to determine that all receive a sufficient quantity of food.
( d ) Food and food receptacles, if used, must be located so as to minimize any risk of contamination by excreta and pests. Food receptacles must be kept clean and must be sanitized in accordance with the procedures listed in § 3.84(b)(3) of this subpart at least once every 2 weeks. Used food receptacles must be sanitized before they can be used to provide food to a different nonhuman primate or social grouping of nonhuman primates. Measures must be taken to ensure there is no molding, deterioration, contamination, or caking or wetting of food placed in self-feeders.
Opinion issued Febru ary 21 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

NO. 01 - 12 - 00983 - CV

JESUS H. GAYTAN , Appellant V. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. , Appellee
On Appeal from the Co unty Civil C our t at Law No . 1 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2010 - 15538



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Jesus H. Gaytan has neither paid the required filing fee for this appeal nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 5 (“A party who is not excused by statute or these rules from paying costs must
pay

— at the time an item is presented for filing

— whatever fees are required by2 statute or Supreme Court order.”), 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); see al so T EX
. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN
. § 51.207 (Vernon Supp. 2012), §

. 51.941(a) (Vernon 200 5), § 101.041 (Vernon Supp. 2012 ) (listing fees in court of appeals); Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Jud icial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07

- 9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in T EX
. R. A PP
. P . app. A § B(1) (listing fees in court of appeals). In addition, the county clerk has informed the Court that a ppellant h as nei ther paid, n or made arrangements to pay, the fee for preparing the clerk = s record. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 37.3(b) (allowing dismissal of appeal if no clerk’s record filed due to appellant’s fault). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appell ant did
not respond. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule); 37.3(b) (allowing dismissal of appeal if no clerk’s record filed due to appellant’ s fault); 42.3(b ) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case). Accordingly, w e dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We dismiss any pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Bland, and Massengale.
### Part A—Market Development, Research, and Information
Editorial Note on Part 113
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 113 appear at 79 FR 55969, Sept. 18, 2014.

§ 113.55 Detection of extraneous agents in Master Seed Virus. Unless otherwise prescribed in a Standard Requirement or in a filed Outline of Production, each Master Seed Virus (MSV) shall be tested as prescribed in this section. A MSV found unsatisfactory by any prescribed test shall not be used. A serial of biological product shall not be released if produced from a MSV that is found unsatisfactory by any prescribed test. ( a ) At least a 1.0 ml aliquot per cell culture of MSV shall be dispensed onto monolayers (at least 75 cm2 in area) of: ( 1 ) Vero (African green monkey kidney) cell line;
( 2 ) Embryonic cells, neonatal cells, or a cell line of the species for which the vaccine is recommended; and
( 3 ) Embryonic cells, neonatal cells, or a cell line of the species of cells in which the MSV is presently being propagated if different than prescribed in paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this section. Cell lines used shall have been found satisfactory when tested as prescribed in § 113.52 and primary cells used shall have been found satisfactory when tested as prescribed in § 113.51. If the MSV is cytopathic for or causes hemadsorption in the cells in which it is to be tested, the MSV shall be neutralized with monospecific antiserum supplied or approved by Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) or counteracted by a method approved by APHIS.
( b ) At least one monolayer of each cell type used in the test shall be maintained as an uninoculated control.
( c ) Each monolayer shall be maintained at least 14 days.
( d ) Cells shall be subcultured at least once during the maintenance period. All but the last subculture shall result in at least one new monolayer at least 75 cm2. The last subculture shall meet the minimum area requirement specified in §§ 113.46 and 113.47.
( e ) Monolayers shall be examined regularly throughout the 14-day maintenance period for evidence of cytopathogenic agents. If evidence of a cytopathogenic agent is found, the MSV is unsatisfactory.
( f ) At the conclusion of the 14-day maintenance period, monolayers shall be tested for: ( 1 ) Cytopathogenic and/or hemadsorbing agents as prescribed in § 113.46;
( 2 ) Extraneous agents by the fluorescent antibody technique as prescribed in § 113.47.
[50 FR 444, Jan. 4, 1985, as amended at 56 FR 66784, Dec. 26, 1991]
#### § 156.5 Availability of service.

Subject to § 156.8, service under this part will be furnished, upon application, within the limits of available Department personnel and facilities, at any plant the operator of which applies for or endorses the application for the service if the Administrator finds that: the forms of certificates desired by the applicant require the certification of class, quality, quantity, or condition; the plant and its methods of processing, handling and storage of the products intended for certification are adequate to warrant the issuance of the desired certificates; the requirements of part 130 of this title are met; and the requirements of § 156.7 are met.

[23 FR 10111, Dec. 23, 1958, as amended at 57 FR 30899, July 13, 1992; 62 FR 19040, Apr. 18, 1997; 72 FR 70766, Dec. 13, 2007]
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1250,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with thequarterly report of Power3 Medical Products, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSBfor the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John P. Burton,Chief  Accounting  Officer of the  Company,  certify, to the  best of my knowledge,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

The Report fully compileswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| September 9,  2005 | /s/ John P.  Burton                      |   |
|-------------------------|------------------------------------------|--------|
|                    |  John P. Burton                     |
|                    |  Chief Accounting Officer           |
|                    |  Power3 Medical Products, Inc. |

 

1

----
(67 South. 951)

No. 20862.

#### STATE v. FOGGIN.

(Feb. 23, 1915.

Rehearing Denied March 22, 1915.)

Appeal from First Judicial District Court, Parish of Caddo; J. R. Land, Judge.

Dan Foggin was convicted of violating an ordinance of a police jury, and appeals.

Reversed, and defendant ordered discharged.

See, also, 65 South. 622, 135 La. 497.

Scheen *&*Blanchard and E. P. Mills, all of Shreveport, for appellant. R. G. Pleasant, Atty. Gen., and W. A. Mabry, Dist. Atty., of Shreveport (G. A. Gondran, of New Orleans, of counsel), for the State.

MONROE, C. J.

This case presents the same questions that are presented in the eases of State v. Hagen, 67 South. 935,3 and State v. Whitbeck and Harris, 67 South. 949,4 this day decided, and is governed by the same principles of law. For the reasons assigned in those cases, therefore, the conviction and sentence herein appealed from is set aside, and the defendant ordered to be discharged.

PROYOSTY, LAND, and O’NIELL, JJ., concur in the decree on the ground that the police jury was without authority to pass the ordinance in question.

O’NIELL, J., is of the opinion that this court is -without jurisdiction of the appeal, for the reasons assigned in his dissenting opinion in the case of State v. Hagen, 67 South. 942, decided, this day.

3

Ante, p. 868.

4

Ante, p. 896.
# WORKSHEET ONLY

**– DO NOT MAIL OR FAX** 

Do not send this worksheet to the U.S. Department of Education. Enter data in the reallocation module of the FISAP on the Web http://cbfisap.ed.gov
.
**OMB NO. 1845 -**  **0030 Ex**  **pires: xx/xx/xxxx**  **CAMPUS -**  **BASED REALLOCATION FORM**

**SECTION -**  **A: SCHOOL RELEASE OF 20 12**  **- 20**  **13 AWARD YEAR UNEXPENDED ALLOCATIONS FOR**  **THE FEDERAL SUPPLEMENTAL EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY GRANT, FEDERAL WORK -**  **STUDY AND FEDERAL PERKINS LOAN PROGRAMS.**  **Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity**  **Grant (FSEOG) Federal Work**  **- Study**  **(FWS) Federal Perkins Loan**  **Federal Capital Contribution (FCC)**  **Unexpended 20 1**  **2 -**  **20 1**  **3 Allocation Amount**  **(1) $ (2) $**  **(3) $**

**SECTION -**  **B: REQUEST FOR SUPPLEMENTAL FWS FUNDS FOR THE**  **2013 -**  **2014 AWARD YEAR.** 

**(COMPLETE** 

### ONLY **IF YOU WANT SUPPLEMENTAL FWS FUNDS) (4) Did your school expend at least 5 percent of its total 20**  **1 2**  **- 20**  **1 3**  **FWS federal funds to compensate students employed as reading tut**  **ors of children or in family literacy activities as part of your community service activities?**  **YES NO**



### ____ ____ **(5) Am ount of supplemental 20**  **1 3**  **- 20**  **1 4**  **FWS funds your school will need for community service jobs.**  **$**



## DUE BY August **1 6**  **, 20 1**  **3 Paperwork Burden Statement**  According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless su ch collection displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 1845- 0030. The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average .20 hours per response, including the time to r eview instructions, search existing data resources, gather the data needed, and complete and review the information collection. **If you have any comments concerning the accuracy of the time estimates(s) or suggestions for improving this form, please**  **write to:** U.S. department of Education, Washington, D.C. 20202-4537. **If you have comments or concerns regarding the status of your individual submission of this form, write directly to:**  Grants & Campus-Based Division, Federal Student Aid, Union Center Plaza, 830 First Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20202.

**WARNING** 

### If you purposely give false or m**isleading inform ation, you m**  **ay be fined up to $20,000, sent to prison, or both.**
### SUBCHAPTER II—LICENSING OF PRIVATE REMOTE SENSING SPACE SYSTEMS
Exhibit 20.1
                                                       ------------

Chase Manhattan Grantor Trust 1995-A


From: The Chase Manhattan Bank

To:   Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.


                   MONTHLY CERTIFICATEHOLDER'S REPORT
                   ----------------------------------

Due Period 26 Beginning Date                     10/01/1997
Due Period 26 End Date                           10/31/1997
Determination Date                               11/10/1997
Remittance Date                                  11/17/1997


I.    Monthly Principal and Principal Carryover Shortfall to Certificateholders
      (Per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                  $ 19.2196465040

II.   Monthly Interest and Unpaid Interest to Certificateholders
      (Per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                   $ 1.4725172381

III.  Monthly Expenses Summary

      A. Servicing Fee Disbursement                                $ 368,212.67
      B. Cash Collateral Account Expense                                 $ 0.00
      C. Total Expenses paid
         (per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                $ 0.2454195408

IV.   Cash Collateral Account Deposit Amount                             $ 0.00

V.    Outstanding Advance Summary

      A. From Prior Period                                       $ 3,881,508.67
      B. From Current Period                                     $ 3,739,298.42
      C. Change in Amount Between Periods (Lines B - A)           $ -142,210.25

VI.   Pool Factor Information

      A. Certificate Principal Balance                         $ 413,019,203.83
      B. Initial Certificate Balance                         $ 1,500,339,658.38
      C. Pool Factor (Lines A / B)                               0.275283800920

VII.  Available Cash Collateral Account Information for Due Period

      A. Available Cash Collateral Amount                       $ 22,092,760.09
      B. Available Cash Collateral Amount Percentage            5.000000001132%

VIII. Required Cash Collateral Amount

      A. For the Current Collection Period                      $ 22,092,760.09
      B. For the Next Collection Period                         $ 20,650,960.19
FORM RD 2006-46 (Rev. 01-98)

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE MANUAL ISSUE No.

RURAL DEVELOPMENT WSAL PN 591

Washington, D.C 20250 DATE

September 15, 2023

PROCEDURE NOTICE

RD MANUAL CHANGES

INSERT RD INS 440.1 INTEREST RATES, AMORTIZATION, 

(WSAL) GUARANTEE FEE, ANNUAL CHARGE, AND 

FIXED PERIOD. This Instruction is 

partially revised as follows:

Exhibit B is partially revised to update the Treasury Judgement rate and the 

effective date of September 1, 2023.

REMOVE INSERT

Exhibit B: Exhibit B: 

 Pages 1 & 2 dated 08-04-23 Pages 1 & 2 revised 09-15-23.

oOo

READ PROCEDURE - DISCUSS IN STAFF CONFERENCE - KEEP PROCEDURE MANUAL UP TO DATE
### §2807. Report

The Bureau, in consultation with the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, shall report annually to the Congress on the utility of the requirements of section 2803(b)(4) of this title.

(Pub. L. 94–200, title III, §308, Dec. 31, 1975, 89 Stat. 1128; Pub. L. 98–181, title I [title VII, §701(b)], Nov. 30, 1983, 97 Stat. 1266; Pub. L. 101–73, title XII, §1211(h), Aug. 9, 1989, 103 Stat. 526; Pub. L. 111–203, title X, §1094(1), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 2097.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2010—Pub. L. 111–203 substituted "Bureau" for "Board".

1989—Pub. L. 101–73 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section read as follows:

"(a) The Board, in consultation with the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, is authorized and directed to carry out a study to determine the feasibility and usefulness of requiring depository institutions located outside primary metropolitan statistical areas, metropolitan statistical areas, or consolidated metropolitan statistical areas that are not comprised of designated primary metropolitan statistical areas, as defined by the Office of Management and Budget, to make disclosures comparable to those required by this chapter.

"(b) A report on the study under this section shall be transmitted to the Congress not later than three years after December 31, 1975."

1983—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 98–181 substituted "primary metropolitan statistical areas, metropolitan statistical areas, or consolidated metropolitan statistical areas that are not comprised of designated primary metropolitan statistical areas" for "standard metropolitan statistical areas".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2010 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 111–203 effective on the designated transfer date, see section 1100H of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as a note under section 552a of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### Effective Date of 1989 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 101–73 applicable to each calendar year beginning after Dec. 31, 1989, see section 1211(k) of Pub. L. 101–73, set out as a note under section 2802 of this title.
Cooperative Information Report 26

July 1980

Reviewed and Approved for Reprinting February 1988

Cooperative Farm Bargaining and Price Negotiations

Contents

Foreword

Preface

Acknowledgments

Summary

I. The Need for Farm Bargaining

 Overcoming Weaknesses

 Farm Bargaining and Changes in the Market Structure

II. The Legal Background for Cooperative Farm Bargaining

 The Sherman Act (1890)

 The Capper-Volstead Act (1922)

 Farm Bargaining Compared to Labor Unions

 Court Actions

 The Agricultural Fair Practices Act (1967)

 State Legislation

 Future Legislation

III. The History of Farm Bargaining

 The 1920's

 After World War II

 Milk Bargaining

 Fruit and Vegetable Bargaining

 National Farmers Organization

 American Farm Bureau

 Broilers and the AAMA

 A Half Century of Progress

IV. How Farm Bargaining Works

 Opportunities and Limitations

 Common Characteristics

 Philosophy

 Bargaining Power

 The Individual Farmer's Weaknesses
 Growth in Spite of Fears

 Association Goals

V. Types of Bargaining Associations

 Marketing Type

 Bargaining or Sales Agent

 Exclusive Representative in Collective Bargaining

 Market Service Association

 Exclusive Agency Bargaining

VI. Why and How Bargaining Associations Are Organized

 Below Cost of Production Prices

 Adverse Terms of Trade

 The Arrogant Buyer

 Farmers Must Take the Initiative

 Advantages to Food Companies

 Four Essential Considerations

 A Typical Organizing Effort

 Financing

VII. Managing and Operating a Farm Bargaining Association

 The Manager

 Selecting a Board

 Responsibilities

 Board-Manager Relations

 The Manager's Role

 Member Communications

 Meetings

 Personal Contact

VIII. Bargaining: Planning, Strategy, and Tactics

 The Bargaining and Negotiating Process

 Establishing Goals

 Members Provide the Bargaining Power

 Preparation and Fact Finding

 Who Should Negotiate

 Planning Strategy

 What People Strive For

 The Bottom Line

 Values Will Not Change

 Maximizing the Negotiation Effort

 Negotiating

 Power

 Mediation and Arbitration

 Operating Cooperatives

 Final Decision Making
IX. The Future of Farm Bargaining

Appendixes