12936 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 46 / Wednesday, March 9, 2011 / Notices 

basis. In the past, the long-form data 

were collected only at the time of each 

decennial census. After years of 

development and testing, the ACS began 

full implementation in households in 

January 2005 and in group quarters 

(GQs) in January 2006. 

Collecting long-form data during the 

decade through the ACS has had a 

profound effect on the census design 

plan. The collection of long-form data 

had added substantial burden and 

complexity to past decennial censuses. 

Implementing the ACS means that the 

Decennial Census can focus on its 

constitutional mandate to accurately 

count the population to apportion the 

House of Representatives. The ACS— 

supported by a complete and accurate 

address system—has simplified the 

census design, resulting in 

improvements in both coverage and data 

quality, while providing current data on 

detailed population, social, economic, 

and housing characteristics. 

The ACS provides more timely 

information for critical economic 

planning by governments and the 

private sector. In the current 

information-based economy, federal, 

state, tribal, and local decision makers, 

as well as private business and nongovernmental organizations, need 

current, reliable, and comparable 

socioeconomic data to chart the future. 

In 2006, the ACS began publishing upto-date profiles of American 

communities every year, providing 

policymakers, planners, and service 

providers in the public and private 

sectors this information every year—not 

just every ten years. 

The ACS released estimates of 

population and housing characteristics 

for geographic areas of all sizes in 

December 2010. These data products, 

used by federal agencies and others, are 

similar in scope to the Summary File 3 

tables from Census 2000. The 2010 

Census did not include these detailed 

characteristics, leaving the ACS as the 

source of data for uses previously 

associated with the decennial census 

long form. 

The Census Bureau presently plans to 

resubmit the ACS to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

extended clearance. The current ACS 

content has been reviewed by the 

Census Bureau, in conjunction with 

Federal agency stakeholders, to 

determine potential areas for improved 

item response and/or data quality. 

II. Method of Collection 

The Census Bureau will mail 

questionnaires to households selected 

for the ACS. For households that do not 

return a questionnaire, Census Bureau 

staff will attempt to conduct interviews 

via Computer-assisted Telephone 

Interviews (CATI). We will also conduct 

Computer-assisted Personal Interviews 

(CAPI) for a sub sample of 

nonrespondents. A content reinterview 

will be conducted from a small sample 

of respondents. 

For most types of GQs, Census Bureau 

field representatives (FRs) will conduct 

personal interviews with respondents to 

complete questionnaires or, if necessary, 

leave questionnaires and ask 

respondents to complete. Information 

from GQ contacts will be collected via 

CAPI. A GQ contact reinterview will be 

conducted from a sample of GQs 

primarily through CATI. A very small 

percentage of the GQ reinterviews will 

be conducted via CAPI. 

The Census Bureau staff will provide 

Telephone Questionnaire Assistance 

(TQA) and if the respondent indicates a 

desire to complete the survey by 

telephone, the TQA interviewer 

conducts the interview. 

III. Data 

OMB Control Number: 0607–0810. 

Form Number: ACS–1, ACS–1(SP), 

ACS–1(PR), ACS–1(PR)SP, ACS–1(GQ), 

ACS–1(PR)(GQ), GQFQ, ACS CATI 

(HU), ACS CAPI (HU), ACS RI (HU), and 

AGQ QI, AGQ RI. 

Type of Review: Regular submission. 

Affected Public: Individuals, 

households, and businesses. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

Pending receipt of requested funds to 

increase the ACS sample, we plan to 

contact the following number of 

respondents each year: 3,540,000 

households; 200,000 persons in group 

quarters; 20,000 contacts in group 

quarters; 43,000 households for 

reinterview; and 1,500 group quarters 

contacts for reinterview. 

Estimated Time per Response: 

Estimates are 38 minutes per household, 

15 minutes per group quarters contact, 

25 minutes per resident in group 

quarters, and 10 minutes per household 

or GQ contact in the reinterview 

samples. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden 

Hours: 2,337,900. 

Estimated Total Annual Cost: Except 

for their time, there is no cost to 

respondents. 

Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory. 

Legal Authority: Title 13, United 

States Code, Section 182. 

IV. Request for Comments 

Comments are invited on: (a) Whether 

the proposed collection of information 

is necessary for the proper performance 

of the functions of the agency, including 

whether the information shall have 

practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden 

(including hours and cost) of the 

proposed collection of information; (c) 

ways to enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and (d) ways to minimize the 

burden of the collection of information 

on respondents, including through the 

use of automated collection techniques 

or other forms of information 

technology. 

Comments submitted in response to 

this notice will be summarized and/or 

included in the request for OMB 

approval of this information collection; 

they also will become a matter of public 

record. 

Dated: March 3, 2011. 

Gwellnar Banks, 

Management Analyst, Office of the Chief 

Information Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2011–5269 Filed 3–8–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–07–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

[Order No. 1747] 

Reorganization of Foreign-Trade Zone 

72 Under Alternative Site Framework; 

Indianapolis, IN 

Pursuant to its authority under the ForeignTrade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), the ForeignTrade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the 

following Order: 

Whereas, the Board adopted the 

alternative site framework (ASF) (74 FR 

1170, 01/12/09; correction 74 FR 3987, 

01/22/09; 75 FR 71069–71070, 11/22/ 

10) as an option for the establishment or 

reorganization of general-purpose zones; 

Whereas, the Indianapolis Airport 

Authority, grantee of Foreign-Trade 

Zone 72, submitted an application to the 

Board (FTZ Docket 50–2010, filed 8/17/ 

2010) for authority to reorganize under 

the ASF with a service area of 

Bartholomew, Benton, Boone, Carroll, 

Cass, Clay, Clinton, Decatur, Delaware, 

Fayette, Fountain, Franklin, Grant, 

Greene, Hamilton, Hancock, Hendricks, 

Henry, Howard, Jennings, Johnson, 

Lawrence, Madison, Marion, Miami, 

Monroe, Montgomery, Morgan, Owen, 

Parke, Putnam, Rush, Shelby, 

Tippecanoe, Tipton, Vigo, Warren, 

Wayne and White Counties, Indiana, 

adjacent to the Indianapolis Customs 

and Border Protection port of entry, FTZ 

72’s existing Sites 1–3 and 12–13 would 

be categorized as magnet sites, existing 

Sites 9–11 would be categorized as 

usage-driven sites and the grantee 


Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 46 / Wednesday, March 9, 2011 / Notices 12937 

proposes three additional magnet sites 

(Sites 6–8); 

Whereas, notice inviting public 

comment was given in the Federal 

Register (75 FR 51752–51753, 8/23/ 

2010) and the application has been 

processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and 

the Board’s regulations; and, 

Whereas, the Board adopts the 

findings and recommendation of the 

examiner’s report, and finds that the 

requirements of the FTZ Act and 

Board’s regulations are satisfied, and 

that the proposal is in the public 

interest; 

Now, therefore, the Board hereby 

orders: 

The application to reorganize FTZ 72 

under the alternative site framework is 

approved, subject to the FTZ Act and 

the Board’s regulations, including 

Section 400.28, to the Board’s standard 

2,000-acre activation limit for the 

overall general-purpose zone project, to 

a five-year ASF sunset provision for 

magnet sites that would terminate 

authority for Sites 2–3, 6–8 and 12–13 

if not activated by March 31, 2016, and 

to a three-year ASF sunset provision for 

usage-driven sites that would terminate 

authority for Sites 9–11 if no foreignstatus merchandise is admitted for a 

bona fide customs purpose by March 31, 

2014. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 3rd day of 

March, 2011. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration, Alternate Chairman, ForeignTrade Zones Board. 

Elizabeth Whiteman, 

Acting Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2011–5389 Filed 3–8–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

[Order No. 1746] 

Reorganization of Foreign-Trade Zone 

46 Under Alternative Site Framework; 

Cincinnati, OH 

Pursuant to its authority under the ForeignTrade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), the ForeignTrade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the 

following Order: 

Whereas, the Board adopted the 

alternative site framework (ASF) (74 FR 

1170, 01/12/09; correction 74 FR 3987, 

01/22/09; 75 FR 71069–71070, 11/22/ 

10) as an option for the establishment or 

reorganization of general-purpose zones; 

Whereas, the Greater Cincinnati 

Foreign-Trade Zone Inc., grantee of 

Foreign-Trade Zone 46, submitted an 

application to the Board (FTZ Docket 

41–2010, filed 5/21/2010) for authority 

to reorganize under the ASF with a 

service area of Hamilton, Butler, 

Warren, Brown and Clermont Counties, 

Ohio, in and adjacent to the Cincinnati 

Customs and Border Protection port of 

entry, FTZ 46’s existing Sites 3, 4 and 

5 would be categorized as magnet sites, 

and the grantee proposes an initial 

usage-driven site (Site 6); 

Whereas, notice inviting public 

comment was given in the Federal 

Register (75 FR 30774–30775, 6/2/2010) 

and the application has been processed 

pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board’s 

regulations; and, 

Whereas, the Board adopts the 

findings and recommendations of the 

examiner’s report, and finds that the 

requirements of the FTZ Act and 

Board’s regulations are satisfied, and 

that the proposal is in the public 

interest; 

Now, therefore, the Board hereby 

orders: 

The application to reorganize FTZ 46 

under the alternative site framework is 

approved, subject to the FTZ Act and 

the Board’s regulations, including 

Section 400.28, to the Board’s standard 

2,000-acre activation limit for the 

overall general-purpose zone project, to 

a five-year ASF sunset provision for 

magnet sites that would terminate 

authority for Sites 3 and 5 if not 

activated by March 31, 2016, and to a 

three-year ASF sunset provision for 

usage-driven sites that would terminate 

authority for Site 6 if no foreign-status 

merchandise is admitted for a bona fide 

customs purpose by March 31, 2014. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 3rd day of 

March 2011. 

Ronald K. Lorentzen, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration, Alternate Chairman, ForeignTrade Zones Board. 

ATTEST: llllllllllllll

Elizabeth Whiteman, 

Acting Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2011–5391 Filed 3–8–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–533–824] 

Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet 

and Strip From India: Extension of 

Time Limit for Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty New Shipper 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 9, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elfi 

Blum or Toni Page, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 6, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–0197 or (202) 482– 

1398, respectively. 

Background 

On December 21, 2010, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) issued the preliminary 

results of the new shipper review under 

the antidumping duty order on 

polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet 

and strip from India for SRF Limited 

(SRF) covering the period July 1, 2009, 

through December 31, 2009. See 

Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet 

and Strip from India: Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty New 

Shipper Review, 75 FR 81570 (December 

28, 2010) (Preliminary Results). The 

final results of review are currently due 

March 21, 2011. 

Statutory Time Limits 

Section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 

19 CFR 351.214(i)(1), provide that the 

Department will issue the preliminary 

results of a new shipper review of an 

antidumping duty order within 180 

days after the day on which the review 

was initiated, and the final results of 

review within 90 days after the date on 

which the preliminary results were 

issued. However, if the Department 

concludes that a new shipper review is 

extraordinarily complicated, the 

Department may extend the 180-day 

period to 300 days, and the 90-day 

period to 150 days. See 19 CFR 

351.214(i)(2). 

Extension of Time Limit for Final 

Results 

The Department determines that this 

new shipper review is extraordinarily 

complicated because of questions that 

arose after the Preliminary Results 

concerning the bona fides of the new 


Emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES