alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1403

To amend chapter 3 of title 28, United States Code, to modify en banc

procedures for the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 20, 1999

Mrs. FEINSTEIN (for herself, Mr. REID, Mrs. BOXER, Mr. BRYAN, and Mrs.

MURRAY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend chapter 3 of title 28, United States Code, to

modify en banc procedures for the Ninth Circuit Court

of Appeals, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ninth Circuit Court

5 of Appeals En Banc Procedures Act of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. NINTH CIRCUIT EN BANC PROCEDURES.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 46 of title 28, United

8 States Code, is amended—

9 (1) in subsection (d)—
2

•S 1403 IS

1 (A) by striking ‘‘paragraph (c)’’ and in2 serting ‘‘subsection (c) or (d)’’; and

3 (B) by redesignating subsection (d) as sub4 section (e); and

5 (2) by inserting after subsection (c) the fol6 lowing:

7 ‘‘(d)(1) Notwithstanding the first sentence of sub8 section (c), 40 percent or more of the circuit judges of

9 the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals who are in regular ac10 tive service may order a hearing or rehearing before the

11 court en banc for such circuit.

12 ‘‘(2) Notwithstanding the second sentence of sub13 section (c) or section 6 of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to

14 provide for the appointment of additional district and cir15 cuit judges, and for other purposes’’, approved October

16 20, 1978 (28 U.S.C. 41 note; Public Law 95–486; 92

17 Stat. 1633) a majority of the circuit judges of the Ninth

18 Circuit Court of Appeals who are in regular active service

19 shall be required to sit on a court en banc for such circuit.

20 ‘‘(3) The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals shall be or21 ganized in no less than 3 administrative units based on

22 geographic regions. Each panel of the Ninth Circuit Court

23 of Appeals shall be assigned to an administrative unit. In

24 any case or controversy heard by any panel of an adminis25 trative unit of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, at least
3

•S 1403 IS

1 1 judge of that administrative unit shall be assigned to

2 that panel.’’.

3 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—

4 Section 6 of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to provide for the

5 appointment of additional district and circuit judges, and

6 for other purposes’’, approved October 20, 1978 (28

7 U.S.C. 41 note; Public Law 95–486; 92 Stat. 1933) is

8 amended by striking ‘‘Any court of appeals’’ and inserting

9 ‘‘Subject to section 46(d)(2) of title 28, United States

10 Code, any court of appeals’’.

11 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

12 The amendments made by this Act shall take effect

13 60 days after the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Elementary Secondary EducationGender IssuesLanguage ArtsSex BiasSex FairnessSex RoleSex StereotypesTeacher AttitudesTeacher RoleTeacher Student Relationship

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1342 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1342

 To repeal the Federal estate and gift taxes and the tax on generation-
                          skipping transfers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              July 1, 1999

  Mr. Allard introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To repeal the Federal estate and gift taxes and the tax on generation-
                          skipping transfers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF FEDERAL TRANSFER TAXES.

    (a) In General.--Subtitle B of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 
repealed.
    (b) Effective Date.--The repeal made by subsection (a) shall apply 
to the estates of decedents dying, and gifts and generation-skipping 
transfers made, after the date of enactment of this Act.
    (c) Technical and Conforming Changes.--The Secretary of the 
Treasury or the Secretary's delegate shall, as soon as practicable but 
in any event not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this 
Act, submit to the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of 
Representatives and the Committee on Finance of the Senate a draft of 
any technical and conforming changes in the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 which are necessary to reflect throughout such Code the changes in 
the substantive provisions of law made by this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
               <LEGEND>  THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
               EXTRACTED FROM THE RAKO CORPORATION FINANCIAL
               STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998
               AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
               SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>   1
       
<S>                           <C>                     
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS                   
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0           
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0           
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,025
<OTHER-SE>                                      93,075
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,003
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,003)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,003)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,003)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.00)
        

</TABLE>
C‘l—ftraffe"m ' j. Parraguirre 

J. 

demonstrate the necessary elements of a claim for relief so that the 

defending party has adequate notice of the nature of the claim and relief 

sought"); see NRS 118A.510 (noting the requirements for a retaliatory 

eviction claim); NRCP 9(b) (requiring that claims for fraud must be stated 

with particularity); May v. Anderson, 121 Nev. 668, 672, 119 P.3d 1254, 

1257 (2005) (stating that an enforceable contract requires an offer and 

acceptance, meeting of the minds, and consideration); PETA v. Bobby 

Berosini, Ltd., 111 Nev. 615, 630-31, 895 P.2d 1269, 1279 (1995) 

(recognizing that to sustain an invasion of privacy, claim a plaintiff must 

actually expect solitude or seclusion, and that expectation must be 

objectively reasonable); Nelson v. City of Las Vegas, 99 Nev. 548, 555, 665 

P.2d 1141, 1145 (1983) (setting forth the required elements for an 

intentional infliction of emotional distress claim); Lied v. Clark Cnty., 94 

Nev. 275, 279, 579 P.2d 171, 173-74 (1978) (requiring that a property right 

must be shown to have been invaded to sustain a trespass action). 

We further affirm the district court's grant of attorney fees 

and costs to respondent, including those attorney fees awarded on the 

basis that appellant failed to appear at multiple hearings on appellant's 

own motions. Gunderson v. D.R. Horton, Inc., 130 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 9, 

319 P.3d 606, 615 (2014). 

It is so ORDERED. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 2 

NEVADA 

(0) 1907A 
cc: Hon. Michelle Leavitt, District Judge 

John Luckett 

Olson, Cannon, Gormley, Angulo & Stoberski 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 3 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A ce
### §1691f. Annual reports to Congress; contents

Each year, the Bureau and the Attorney General shall, respectively, make reports to the Congress concerning the administration of their functions under this subchapter, including such recommendations as the Bureau and the Attorney General, respectively, deem necessary or appropriate. In addition, each report of the Bureau shall include its assessment of the extent to which compliance with the requirements of this subchapter is being achieved, and a summary of the enforcement actions taken by each of the agencies assigned administrative enforcement responsibilities under section 1691c of this title.

(Pub. L. 90–321, title VII, §707, as added Pub. L. 94–239, §7, Mar. 23, 1976, 90 Stat. 255; amended Pub. L. 96–221, title VI, §610(c), Mar. 31, 1980, 94 Stat. 174; Pub. L. 111–203, title X, §1085(1), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 2083.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2010—Pub. L. 111–203 substituted "Bureau" for "Board" wherever appearing.

1980—Pub. L. 96–221 substituted "Each year" for "Not later than February 1 of each year after 1976".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2010 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 111–203 effective on the designated transfer date, see section 1100H of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as a note under section 552a of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### Effective Date of 1980 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 96–221 effective on expiration of two years and six months after Mar. 31, 1980, with all regulations, forms, and clauses required to be prescribed to be promulgated at least one year prior to such effective date, and allowing any creditor to comply with any amendments, in accordance with the regulations, forms, and clauses prescribed by the Board prior to such effective date, see section 625 of Pub. L. 96–221, set out as a note under section 1602 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective Mar. 23, 1976, see section 708 of Pub. L. 90–321, set out as a note under section 1691 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-01-2000
<CASH>                                         2149000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 17209000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    829000
<INVENTORY>                                    6389000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              25974000
<PP&E>                                        67269000
<DEPRECIATION>                                16434000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               109492000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         26647000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                   15702000
<COMMON>                                         21000
<OTHER-SE>                                    10810000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 109492000
<SALES>                                       25085000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              25085000
<CGS>                                         21371000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 21371000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              718000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 198000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    118000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              80000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     80000
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)


</TABLE>
§ 9004.10 Sale of assets acquired for fundraising purposes. ( a ) *General.* A minor or new party candidate may sell assets donated to the candidate's authorized committee(s) or otherwise acquired for fundraising purposes subject to the limitations and prohibitions of 11 CFR 9003.2, Title 52, United States Code, and 11 CFR parts 110 and 114. This section will only apply to major party candidates to the extent that they sell assets acquired either for fundraising purposes in connection with his or her legal and accounting compliance fund or when it is necessary to make up any deficiency in payments received from the Fund due to the application of 11 CFR 9005.2(b).
( b ) *Sale after end of expenditure report period.* A minor or new party candidate, or a major party candidate in the event of a deficiency in the payments received from the Fund due to the application of 11 CFR 9005.2(b), whose outstanding debts exceed the cash on hand after the end of the expenditure report period as determined under 11 CFR 9002.12, may dispose of assets acquired for fundraising purposes in a sale to a wholesaler or other intermediary who will in turn sell such assets to the public provided that the sale to the wholesaler or intermediary is an arms-length transaction. Sales made under this subsection will not be subject to the limitations and prohibitions of Title 52, United States Code and 11 CFR parts 110 and 114.
[56 FR 35919, July 29, 1991, as amended at 79 FR 77851, Dec. 29, 2014]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

VICTOR ADAMS, §

§ No. 319, 2018

Defendant Below, §

Appellant, § Court Below: Superior Court of the 

§ State of Delaware

v. §

§ Cr. ID No. 1109011709A (S)

STATE OF DELAWARE, §

§

Plaintiff Below, §

Appellee. §

Submitted: November 7, 2018

Decided: January 23, 2019

Before STRINE, Chief Justice; SEITZ and TRAYNOR, Justices.

 O R D E R

(1) The appellant, Victor Adams, filed this appeal from the sentence 

imposed on May 24, 2018 for his fourth violation of probation (“VOP”).1 On appeal, 

Adams contends that the Superior Court did not credit him for fourteen days he was 

held in default of bail before the May 24, 2018 VOP proceeding. The appellee, State 

of Delaware, has moved to affirm the Superior Court’s judgment on the ground that 

it is manifest on the face of Adams’ opening brief that the appeal is without merit. 

We agree and affirm.

 

1 The sentence imposed on May 24, 2018 was ordered discharged after Adams has served nine 

months at Level V.
2

(2) At the time of the May 24, 2018 hearing for his fourth VOP, Adams 

was serving the sentence, imposed on November 17, 2017, for his third VOP. For 

the third VOP, the Superior Court sentenced Adams to four years of Level V 

incarceration, suspended after four days for one year of Level II probation.

(3) Appellate review of a sentence is extremely limited and generally ends 

upon a determination that the sentence is within statutory limits.2 When sentencing 

a defendant for a VOP, 11 Del. C. § 4334(c) authorizes the Superior Court to impose 

any period of incarceration—up to and including the balance of incarceration 

remaining on the original sentence—so long as the defendant is given credit for all 

incarceration previously served and the sentence does not exceed the incarceration 

that a prior iteration of the sentence left suspended.3

(4) In this case, the record does not reflect that the sentence imposed on 

May 24, 2018 exceeded statutory limits. Adams was entitled to time-served credit 

for the fourteen days he was held in default of bail before his VOP hearing and 

sentencing on May 24, 2018.4 But he received that credit—and more—when the 

Superior Court sentenced him to only three years and six months of the nearly four 

 

2

Shoates v. State, 2018 WL 3912033 (Del. Aug. 14, 2018) (citing Kurzmann v. State, 903 A.2d 

702, 714 (Del. 2006)).

3 Pavulak v. State, 880 A.2d 1044, 1046 (Del. 2005).

4 Richardson v. State, 2002 WL 972233 (Del. May 9, 2002) (citing 11 Del. C. § 3901(c)). 
3

years of unexpired Level V time that remained from the sentence imposed on 

November 17, 2017 for his third VOP. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to affirm is 

GRANTED. The judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gary F. Traynor

Justice
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 18 (Tuesday, January 28, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 4439]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: C1-2014-01065]

[[Page 4439]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 60

[DOCKET NUMBER [EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0495; FRL 9905-61-OAR]

Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions for New 
Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units

Correction

    In proposed rule document 2014-01065 appearing on pages 3357-3358 
in the issue of Wednesday, January 22, 2014, make the following 
corrections:
    1. On page 3357, in the third column, in the document heading, ``40 
CFR Part 63'' is corrected to read ``40 CFR Part 60''.
    2. On page 3358, in the second column, in the seventh line from the 
bottom, ``List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 63'' should read ``List of 
Subjects in 40 CFR Part 60''.

[FR Doc. C1-2014-01065 Filed 1-27-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alliance Laundry Systems LLC, Alliance Laundry Corporation and Alliance Laundry Holdings LLC
(the Companies) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bruce P. Rounds, Vice President Chief Financial Officer of the
Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|/s/ BRUCE P. ROUNDS                   
|Vice President Chief Financial Officer

August 9, 2010
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas July 18, 2022 No. 04-22-00399-CV IN RE Richard A. GARCIA Original Mandamus Proceeding 1 

## O R D E R Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice Beth Watkins, Justice 2 

### After consideration, we GRANT real party in interest’s “Agreed Motion for Extension of Mandamus Response Deadline.” 3 

### Real party in interest’s response is due on or before July 20, 2022. It is so ORDERED on July 18, 2022. PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:__________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, CLERK OF COURT

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2017-CI-12755, styledIn the Matter of the Marriage of Elizabeth J. RanftGarcia and Richard Anthony Garcia and in the Interest of J.E.R.G., a Child , pending in the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable John D. Gabriel Jr. presiding. 2 Justice Watkins did not participate in this order. 3 A motion for extension of time must state: “the deadline for filing the item in question; the length of the extension sought; the facts relied on to reasonably explain the need for an extension; and the number of previous extensions granted regarding the item in question.” T EX . R. A PP . P. 10.5(b)(1)(A)-(D). Real party in interest did not state the number of previous extensions, if any, granted regarding the mandamus response deadline. Notwithstanding, we apply Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 2 and disregard these deficiencies. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 2.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>     5
<CIK>         0001063293
<NAME>        AMCI INTERNATIONAL, INC.

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            22624
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          1471
<OTHER-SE>                                      (24095)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  9224
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (9224)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.00)


</TABLE>