alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 48 (Friday, March 11, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 13437]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-5338]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards; Meeting of the ACRS 
Subcommittee on Reliability and PRA; Revision to March 24, 2010, ACRS 
Meeting Federal Register Notice

    The Federal Register Notice for the ACRS Subcommittee Meeting on 
Reliability and Probabilistic Risk Assessment scheduled to be held on 
March 24, 2011, has been cancelled.
    The notice of this meeting was previously published in the Federal 
Register on Wednesday, March 2, 2011, [75 FR 11525].
    Further information regarding this meeting can be obtained by 
contacting John Lai, Designated Federal Official (Telephone: 301-415-
5197, E-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#33795c5b5d1d7f525a735d41501d545c45"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="efa5808781c1a38e86af819d8cc1888099">[email protected]</span></a>) between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. (ET).

    Dated: March 2, 2011.
Yoira Diaz-Sanabria,
Acting Chief, Reactor Safety Branch B, Advisory Committee on Reactor 
Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2011-5338 Filed 3-10-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 381.85 Special diseases.

Carcasses of poultry showing evidence of any disease which is characterized by the presence, in the meat or other edible parts of the carcass, or organisms or toxins dangerous to the consumer, shall be condemned.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 540 

To provide minimum standards for transactions secured by a dwelling, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 25, 2019 

Mr. WARNER (for himself, Mr. ROUNDS, and Mr. BOOKER) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide minimum standards for transactions secured by 

a dwelling, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Self-Employed Mort5 gage Access Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ABILITY TO REPAY. 

7 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section— 

8 (1) the term ‘‘Appendix Q’’ means Appendix Q 

9 to part 1026 of title 12, Code of Federal Regula10 tions; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 540 IS

1 (2) the term ‘‘Bureau’’ means the Bureau of 

2 Consumer Financial Protection; 

3 (3) the terms ‘‘consumer’’ and ‘‘creditor’’ have 

4 the meanings given those terms in section 1026.2 of 

5 title 12, Code of Federal Regulations; 

6 (4) the term ‘‘enterprise’’ has the meaning 

7 given the term in section 1303 of the Federal Hous8 ing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act 

9 of 1992 (12 U.S.C. 4502); and 

10 (5) the term ‘‘Federal Home Loan Bank’’ has 

11 the meaning given the term in section 2 of the Fed12 eral Home Loan Bank Act (12 U.S.C. 1422). 

13 (b) DETERMINATION OF CREDITOR REQUIRE14 MENTS.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enact15 ment of this Act, the Bureau shall amend section 1026.43 

16 of title 12, Code of Federal Regulations, to provide that, 

17 with respect to any creditor requirements under clauses 

18 (v) and (vi) of subsection (e)(2) of that section, the cred19 itor may, in satisfying those requirements, rely on— 

20 (1) the standards under Appendix Q; or 

21 (2) a guide or handbook that— 

22 (A) provides standards with respect to de23 termining income and debt; and 

24 (B) is maintained by— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•S 540 IS

1 (i) an enterprise or a Federal Home 

2 Loan Bank, subject to the approval of the 

3 Federal Housing Finance Agency; 

4 (ii) the Department of Housing and 

5 Urban Development with respect to car6 rying out a program under title II of the 

7 National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. 1707 et 

8 seq.); 

9 (iii) the Department of Veterans Af10 fairs; 

11 (iv) the Department of Agriculture 

12 with respect to carrying out the Doug Be13 reuter Section 502 Single Family Housing 

14 Loan Guarantee Act (42 U.S.C. 1472(h)); 

15 or 

16 (v) the Rural Housing Service. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 18

- 00072

- CR

C OLLIS B URNETT R OBINSON

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 43rd District Court

of Parker County (C R16

- 0735)

June 6, 2019

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no reversible error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment

of the trial cou rt is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

Justice Lee Gabriel
# C_2010134EN.01005602.xml

| 22.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 134/56 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/56

---

Action brought on 18 March 2010 — Capidis v Commission

(Case F-18/10)

2010/C 134/94

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Georges Capidis (Zellik, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision imposing a disciplinary sanction on the applicant in the form of downgrading.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision imposing a disciplinary sanction on the applicant in the form of downgrading by one grade, as provided for in Article 9(1)(f) of Annex IX o the Staff Regulations; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision imposing a disciplinary sanction on the applicant in the form of downgrading by one grade, as provided for in Article 9(1)(f) of Annex IX o the Staff Regulations;

| — | Order the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the European Commission to pay the costs.

---
#### Nelson A. McGill v. John F. Brady.

Motion granted. Order resettled.
<PAGE>
                                                                EXHIBIT 99.1



                                  CERTIFICATION
                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
               SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b)
                 OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED
                                  STATES CODE)

         Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each
of the undersigned officers of Glimcher Realty Trust, a Maryland Real Estate
Investment Trust (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's
knowledge, that:

         The yearly Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002
(the "Form 10-K") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained
in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: March 21, 2003                        /s/ Herbert Glimcher
--------------------                        --------------------
                                                Herbert Glimcher
                                            Chairman of the Board and
                                            Chief Executive Officer


Date: March 21, 2003                       /s/ Melinda A. Janik
--------------------                       --------------------
                                               Melinda A. Janik
                                           Senior Vice President and
                                           Chief Financial Officer

         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed
as part of the Form 10-K or as separate disclosure document.
' .~ 

·-··:
### SUBCHAPTER IV—IMPROVING FEDERAL PRECIPITATION INFORMATION
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 19 - 0305

_________________ ST ATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. MICHAEL JOSEPH HOWARD,

Defendant and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Pur suant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the Honorable John W. Larson , Dis trict Judge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 2 2020

09/02/2020
Case Number: DA 19-0305
LT

iii
i

. . Ss ECY [/| 7 I ie I IES J
eG \(9/ j ho T Vii Li}

Pe

iy LA CHILI| IIe sj
: A egita
7 Y / d i Wiig f Hi) MA j
7 | MLL E & i HH Z

. _ J O ' g Wi Lt] hi | a

. | Ib | Mei
5 7 Le Pati ith

\

Hy

TORTUGAS VALLEY

* CORRES SD A ne 7 SCALE [100,000
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 14, 2019

No. 04

- 18

- 00397

- CV

MPII, INC. D/B/A Mission Park Funeral Chapels and Cemeteries

, Appellant s

v.

Timothy MOTT and Sharlotte Mott,

Appellee s

From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CI00572

Honorable Nor ma Gonzales, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

T he a ppellant ’ s unopp osed motion for extension of time to file reply brief is here by

GRANTED. Time is e xtended to April 12, 2019.

_________________________________ Liz a A. Rodriguez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my h and and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 14th day of March, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
#### § 51.24 Maximum per-head indemnity amounts.

Owners of the types of animals listed in § 51.22 of this subpart are eligible to receive Federal indemnity for their animals. All animals must be individually appraised to determine their fair market value. The indemnity amount will be the appraised value minus the salvage value of the animal, up to a maximum of $20,000 per animal in the case of horses. An independent appraiser selected by the Administrator will conduct appraisals. APHIS will pay the cost of appraisals.
§ 9004.3 Post-election payments. ( a ) *Minor and new party candidates.* Eligible candidates of a minor party or of a new party who, as candidates, receive 5 percent or more of the total number of popular votes cast for the office of President in the election shall be entitled to payments under 11 CFR part 9005 equal, in the aggregate, to a proportionate share of the amount allowed for major party candidates under 11 CFR 9004.1. The amount to which a minor or new party candidate is entitled shall bear the same ratio to the amount received by the major party candidates as the number of popular votes received by the minor or new party candidate in the Presidential election bears to the average number of popular votes received by the major party candidates for President in that election.
( b ) *Amount of entitlement.* The aggregate payments to which an eligible candidate shall be entitled shall not exceed an amount equal to the lower of: ( 1 ) The amount of qualified campaign expenses incurred by such eligible candidate and his or her authorized committee(s), reduced by the amount of contributions which are received to defray qualified campaign expenses by such eligible candidate and such committee(s); or
( 2 ) The aggregate payments to which the eligible candidates of a major party are entitled under 11 CFR 9004.1, reduced by the amount of contributions received by such eligible candidates and their authorized committees to defray qualified campaign expenses in the case of a deficiency in the Fund.
( c ) *Amount of entitlement limited by pre-election payment.* If an eligible candidate is entitled to payment under 11 CFR 9004.2, the amount allowable to that candidate under this section shall also be limited to the amount, if any, by which the entitlement under 11 CFR 9004.3(a) exceeds the amount of the entitlement under 11 CFR 9004.2.
# C_2013260EN.01005102.xml

| 7.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/51

---

Order of the General Court of 5 July 2013 — SK Hynix v Commission

(Joined Cases T-148/10 and T-149/10) (1)

1

2013/C 260/92

Language of the case: English

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the joined cases be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 148, 5.6.2010.

1

---
According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a 

collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information collection is 0572–

0107. The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average .1 of an hour per response, including the time for 

reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection 

of information. 

U.S. Department of Agriculture 

Rural Utilities Service 

RUS Form 743 (Rev. 12-90)

CERTIFICATE OF CONTRACTOR 

AND INDEMNITY AGREEMENT

, certifies that 

he is the 1

TITLE OR DESIGNATION

of , the Contractor in

NAME OF CONTRACTOR

a Contract dated , 20 , entered into between the Contractor 

and the Owner, for the

NAME OF RUS BORROWER

construction of a rural telephone Project (hereinafter referred to as Project), which bears the Rural 

Utilities Service Project Designation and that he is authorized 

RUS DESIGNATION

to and does make this Certificate and Indemnity Agreement on behalf of said Contractor in order to 

induce the Owner to make payment to the Contractor, in accordance with the provisions of the said 

contract and to induce the Rural Utilities Service to advance monies to the Owner for the construction 

performed pursuant to the contract. 

Undersigned further says that all persons who have furnished labor in connection with of the 

Project represented by the Final Invoice dated have been paid

in full; that all manufacturers, materialmen and subcontractors which furnished any materials or service, 

or both, for the said Project have been paid in full, that no lien has been filed against the Project and no 

person has any right to claim any lien against the Project. 

Undersigned further says that if the Owner pays the Contractor the contract price for the said 

Project the Contractor will indemnify and hold harmless and does hereby undertake and agree to 

indemnify and hold harmless the Owner from any claim or lien arising out of the negligence or other fault 

of the Contractor in respect of the performance-of the contract which may have been or may be filed 

against the Owner.

SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR

 

1

 President, Vice-President, Partner or Owner, or if signed by other than one of the foregoing, Power of Attorney signed by one 

of the foregoing should be attached. Indicate applicable designation.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 26, 2011 

t0919 

Order 

 

September 26, 2011 

143246 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 143246 

 COA: 300987 

Kalamazoo CC: 2002-000828-FC 

JOSEPH KANEM WHITE, III, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 21, 2011 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


WASHINGTON, DC 20549





FORM 6-K


REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER


PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16 OF THE


SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934





3 August 2023


Commission File Number: 001-10691


DIAGEO plc


( Translation of registrant’s name into English )





16 Great Marlborough Street, London, United Kingdom, W1F 7HS


( Address of principal executive offices )





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.





Form 20-F þ Form 40-F  ̈






















































































---




SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


Diageo plc


(Registrant)


Date: 03 August 2023


By:  /s/ James Edmunds


James Edmunds


Deputy Company Secretary








---




EXHIBIT INDEX





EXHIBIT NUMBEREXHIBIT DESCRIPTION99Diageo plc Annual Report 2023 dated 3 August 2023
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

Order 

September 21, 2012

145808-15 & (33)(34)(35)

INTERNATIONAL TRANSMISSION 

COMPANY, d/b/a ITC,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 145808

COA: 311949

Washtenaw CC: 11-001270-CC 

GREGORY K. BEABER, et al, Defendants-Appellees,

and 

CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY,

Appellee.

_________________________________________/

INTERNATIONAL TRANSMISSION 

COMPANY, d/b/a ITC,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 145809

COA: 311988

Washtenaw CC: 11-001273-CC 

MATTHEW DIXON, et al, Defendants-Appellees,

and 

CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY,

Appellee.

_________________________________________/
2

INTERNATIONAL TRANSMISSION 

COMPANY, d/b/a ITC,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 145810

COA: 311989

Washtenaw CC: 11-001297-CC 

PATRICIA KUHN, et al, Defendants-Appellees,

and 

CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY,

Appellee.

_________________________________________/

INTERNATIONAL TRANSMISSION 

COMPANY, d/b/a ITC,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 145811

COA: 311990

Washtenaw CC: 11-001299-CC 

ESTATE OF LILA SLAY, et al, Defendants-Appellees,

and 

CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY,

Appellee.

_________________________________________/

INTERNATIONAL TRANSMISSION 

COMPANY, d/b/a ITC,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 145812

COA: 311991

Washtenaw CC: 11-001265-CC 

MICHAEL A. ROGERS, et al, Defendants-Appellees,

and 

CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY,

Appellee.

_________________________________________/
3

INTERNATIONAL TRANSMISSION 

COMPANY, d/b/a ITC,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 145813

COA: 311992

Washtenaw CC: 11-001269-CC 

DAVID C. LEMKE, et al, Defendants-Appellees,

and 

CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY,

Appellee.

_________________________________________/

INTERNATIONAL TRANSMISSION 

COMPANY, d/b/a ITC,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 145814

COA: 311993

Washtenaw CC: 11-001276-CC 

WARREN L. SMITH, et al, Defendants-Appellees,

and 

CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY,

Appellee.

_________________________________________/

INTERNATIONAL TRANSMISSION 

COMPANY, d/b/a ITC,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 145815

COA: 311994

Washtenaw CC: 11-001279-CC 

HARRY B. LIOGGHIO, et al, Defendants-Appellees,

and 

CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY,

Appellee.

_________________________________________/
I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

September 21, 2012

p0918

4

On order of the Court, the motions for immediate consideration and to waive the 

transcript requirement are GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the 

September 5, 2012 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, 

because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should now be reviewed by 

this Court. The motion for stay is DENIED as moot.
#### § 354.225 Lavatory accommodations.

Modern lavatory accommodations and properly located facilities for cleaning utensils and hands shall be provided.

(a) Adequate lavatory and toilet accommodations, including, but not being limited to, running hot water and cold water, soap, and towels, shall be provided. Such accommodations shall be in or near toilet and locker rooms and also at such other places in the plant as may be essential to the cleanliness of all personnel handling products.

(b) Sufficient metal containers shall be provided for used towels and other wastes.

(c) An adequate number of hand washing facilities serving areas where dressed rabbits and edible products are prepared shall be operated by other than hand-operated controls, or shall be of a continuous flow type which provides an adequate flow of water for washing hands.

(d) Durable signs shall be posted conspicuously in each toilet room and locker room directing employees to wash their hands before returning to work.

(e) Toilet facilities shall be provided according to the following formula:

| Persons of same sex | Toilet bowls required |
| --- | --- |
| 1 to 15, inclusive | 1 |
| 16 to 35, inclusive | 2 |
| 36 to 55, inclusive | 1 3 |
| 56 to 80, inclusive | 1 4 |
| For each additional 30 persons in excess of 80 | 1 1 |
| | |
| --- | --- |
| 1 Urinals may be substituted for toilet bowls but only to the extent of 1/3 of the total number of bowls stated. | |
#### § 381.210 Poultry and other articles subject to administrative detention.

Any poultry carcass, or part thereof; or any product made wholly or in part from any poultry carcass or part thereof; or any dead, dying, disabled, or diseased poultry is subject to detention for a period not to exceed 20 days when found by any authorized representative of the Secretary upon any premises where it is held for purposes of, or during or after distribution in commerce or otherwise subject to the Act, and there is reason to believe that any such poultry or other article is adulterated or misbranded and is capable of use as human food or has not been inspected, in violation of the provisions of the Act, any other Federal law, or the laws of any State or territory, or the District of Columbia; or that it has been or is intended to be distributed in violation of the provisions of the Act, any other Federal law, or the laws of any State or territory, or the District of Columbia.