alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 6895** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. KENNETH D. BEVERLY , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond
. Henry E. Hudson , District Judge. ( 3:05

- cr - 00526

- HEH

- 1; 3:14

- cv - 00435

- HEH )

Submitted : August 20, 2015 Decided: August 25, 2015

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Kenneth D. Beverly, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Thomas Buck, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Gregg Robert Nivala, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Gurney Wingate Grant, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Ken neth D. Beverly seeks to appeal the district court’s order s denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion and his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion . The order s are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisf ies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (20 03). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S . at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Beverly has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 381.217 Authority for condemnation or seizure under other provisions of law.

The provisions of this subpart relating to detention, seizure, condemnation and disposition of poultry or other articles do not derogate from authority for retention, condemnation, or seizure conferred by other provisions of the Act, or other laws.
### §419. Delivery of notes prior to delivery to banks

When such notes have been prepared, the notes shall be delivered to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System subject to the order of the Secretary of the Treasury for the delivery of such notes in accordance with this chapter.

(Dec. 23, 1913, ch. 6, §16 (par.), 38 Stat. 267; May 29, 1920, ch. 214, §1, 41 Stat. 654; Pub. L. 103–325, title VI, §602(g)(4), Sept. 23, 1994, 108 Stat. 2293.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning act Dec. 23, 1913, ch. 6, 38 Stat. 251, as amended, known as the Federal Reserve Act. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see References in Text note set out under section 226 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section is comprised of the eighth par. (formerly the ninth par.) of section 16 of act Dec. 23, 1913. For classification to this title of other pars. of section 16, see Codification note set out under section 411 of this title.

On authority of act May 29, 1920, which abolished offices of Assistant Treasurers and distributed their functions, "designated depositary" substituted for "subtreasury" in 1926 ed. of the Code.

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–325, which directed general amendment of "[t]he 9th undesignated paragraph of section 16 of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 419)", was executed to this section to reflect the probable intent of Congress. Prior to amendment, section read as follows: "When such notes have been prepared, they shall be deposited in the Treasury, or in the designated depositary or mint of the United States nearest the place of business of each Federal reserve bank and shall be held for the use of such bank subject to the order of the Comptroller of the Currency for their delivery, as provided by this chapter."
USDA 농촌 개발

미국 농무부

함께하면 번영하는 미국

번영

USDA 원격 교육 및 원격 의료 보조금 프로그램 (DLT)

자금 신청 기회

USDA 는 2021 년 4 월 5 일부터 DLT

프로그램에 따른 자금 지원 신청서 접수를

시작합니다. 신청서는 늦어도 2021 년 6 월

4 일까지 접수되어야 이 보조금 기회에 따른

자금 지원을 받을 수 있습니다.

기관은 신청자가 미국 시골 지역의 형평성과

경제적 기회를 촉진할 프로젝트, 특히 다음 주요

우선 순위를 발전시키는 프로젝트를 고려할

것을 권장합니다. : 

° COVID-19 전염병 억제

° 인종 평등 보장

° 농촌 경제를 재건하고

° 기후 위기 대처.

• 의회는 회계 연도(FY) 2021 에 USDA 농촌

개발 DLT 자금으로 5,700 만 달러를

제공했습니다. 승인된 대로 기관은 전 회계

연도의 프로젝트에 2021 년부터 1,800 만

달러를 적용, 수여했습니다. 약 4,450 만

달러를 사용할 수 있습니다. 이 금액에는

2021 회계연도에 배정된 3920 만 달러와

2020 회계연도에 수여되지 않은 총 530 만

달러가 포함됩니다.

• 또한 기관은 동일한 목적을 위해 추가 경비가

가능해지면 신청 자금을 늘릴 수 있는 권리를

보유합니다.

이 프로그램은 무엇을 합니까?

이 보조금 프로그램은 농촌 지역 사회가 교육 및

의료 전문가를 농촌 지역의 학생, 교사 및 환자와

연결하는 데 필요한 기술 및 훈련을 습득할 수

있도록 지원합니다.

누가 이 프로그램을 신청할 수 있습니까?

통신 시설을 통해 교육 또는 의료 서비스를

제공하는 적격 신청자는 다음과 같습니다.

• 주 및 지방 정부 기관

• 연방에서 인정하는 부족

• 비영리 단체

• 영리 사업

• 적격 법인 컨소시엄

대상 지역은 무엇입니까?

DLT 프로그램의 목적은 인구 20,000 명 이하의

농촌 지역에 혜택을 주는 것입니다.

자금은 어떻게 사용되나요?

보조금은 다음을 위해 사용될 수 있습니다. : 

• 오디오, 비디오 및 양방향 비디오 장비

• 원격 교육 또는 원격 진료를 지원하는 광대역

시설

• 컴퓨터 하드웨어, 네트워크 구성 요소 및

소프트웨어

• 교육 프로그래밍의 습득

• 적격 장비 사용에 대한 기술 지원 및 지침 획득

참고: 인용 및 기타 정보는 변경될 수 있으므로 항상 위의 "이 프로그램을 지배하는

사항" 섹션에 나열된 프로그램 지침을 참조하십시오. 지역 사무실에 연락하여 도움을

받을 수도 있습니다. rd.usda.gov 에서 추가 양식, 리소스 및 프로그램 정보를 찾을 수

있습니다. USDA 는 평등한 기회 제공자, 고용주 및 대출 기관입니다.

2021 년 4 월 마지막 업데이트

어떤 종류의 자금이 제공되나요?

보조금 기금은 전국적으로 경쟁적인 절차를 통해

수여됩니다. 현재 DLT 대출 또는 대출/보조금

조합에 대한 자금 지원은 불가능합니다.

보조금 요건은 무엇입니까?

• 상금은 $50,000 에서 $1 백만 사이입니다.

• 최소 15% 일치가 필요하며 다른 연방 출처에서

올 수 없습니다.

어떻게 시작합니까?

• 본 프로그램의 지원 시기는 정기적으로 전국

사무소를 통해 공지합니다.

• 프로그램 리소스는 rd.usda.gov 에서 온라인으로

제공됩니다(양식, 지침, 증명서 등 포함).

• 추가 정보는 여기를 다시 확인하거나 일반 현장

담당자에게 문의하십시오.

누가 질문에 답할 수 있습니까?

해당 지역을 담당하는 일반 현장 담당자에게

문의하십시오. (202) 720-0800 으로 전화하거나

dltinfo@usda.gov 로 이메일을 보내십시오.

이 프로그램을 지배하는 것은 무엇입니까?

• 연방 규정 코드:

7 CFR 파트 1734

USDA 농촌 개발이 왜 이것을 합니까?

DLT 프로그램은 농촌 주민들이 경제 및 지역 사회

발전의 두 가지 핵심인 교육 및 건강 관리를 위해

현대 통신과 인터넷의 엄청난 잠재력을 활용할 수

있도록 돕습니다.
# C_2011013EN.01002503.xml

| 15.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/25

---

Order of the General Court of 17 November 2010 — Victoria Sánchez v Parliament and Commission

(Case T-61/10) (1)

1

(Action for failure to act - Failure to adopt measures - Application for directions to be issued - Request for protective measures - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly devoid of any basis in law)

2011/C 13/50

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Fernando Marcelino Victoria Sánchez (Seville, Spain) (represented by: initially, N. Domínguez Varela and, subsequently, P. Suarez Plácido, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: N. Lorenz, N Görlitz, P. López-Carceller, agents) and European Commission (represented by: L. Lozano Palacios and I. Martinez del Peral, agents)

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

Application for a declaration of failure to act on the part of the European Parliament and the European Commission in that those institutions unlawfully failed to respond to the applicant’s letter of 6 October 2009, an application for directions to be issued and a request for protective measures.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Mr Fernando Marcelino Victoria Sánchez is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Fernando Marcelino Victoria Sánchez is ordered to pay the costs.

| 3. | There is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene of Mr. Ignacio Ruipérez Aguirre and the ACT Petition Association. |
| --- | --- |

3.

There is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene of Mr. Ignacio Ruipérez Aguirre and the ACT Petition Association.

---

(1)  OJ C 100, 17.4.2010, p. 58.

1

---
# C_2012373EN.01000501.xml

| 1.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 373/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 373/5

---

Judgment of the General Court of 17 October 2012 — Fondation IDIAP v Commission

(Case T-286/10) (1)

1

(Arbitration clause - Sixth Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities - Contracts relating to the Amida, Bacs and Dirac projects - Eligible costs - Additional cost model - Salary of researchers holding permanent employment contracts - Absence of contractor's own resources)

2012/C 373/07

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Fondation de l’Institut de recherche IDIAP (Martigny, Switzerland) (represented by: G. Chapus-Rapin and G. Couchepin, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Dintilhac and A. Sauka, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 272 TFEU seeking a declaration from the Court that certain expenditure incurred by the applicant in the performance of Contract No 33812, relating to the Amida project, Contract No 27140, relating to the Bacs project, and Contract No 27787, relating to the Dirac project, concluded by the European Commission within the framework of the sixth framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities, contributing to the creation of the European Research Area and to innovation (2002 to 2006), established by Decision 1513/2002/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2002 (OJ 2002 L 232, p. 1), is eligible for reimbursement and that, as a consequence, the applicant is not required to repay EUR 98 042,45 in respect of the contract relating to the Dirac project or EUR 251 505,76 in respect of the contract relating to the Amida project, and, in the alternative, an application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the Commission’s decision by which it confirmed the conclusions of an audit to the effect that the costs at issue were ineligible and, second, an order that the Commission arrange for an audit to be undertaken of the projects, to be carried out by a company other than that which carried out the original audit.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Fondation de l’Institut de recherche IDIAP to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission, including the cost of the application for interim measures. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Fondation de l’Institut de recherche IDIAP to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission, including the cost of the application for interim measures.

---

(1)  OJ C 221, 14.8.2010.

1

---
### §1964. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–272, §7(b), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1379

Section, Pub. L. 92–513, title III, §321, formerly §304, Oct. 20, 1972, 86 Stat. 961; renumbered §321, Pub. L. 93–492, title III, §301(a)(3), Oct. 27, 1974, 88 Stat. 1485; amended Pub. L. 94–364, title III, §303, July 14, 1976, 90 Stat. 982, authorized appropriations to carry out this subchapter for fiscal years 1976, 1977, and 1978, and provided that funds were to remain available until expended.
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Rural Development Designates Rural Health Liaison 

WASHINGTON, March 28, 2022 – U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Under Secretary for Rural 

Development Xochitl Torres Small today announced that Kellie Kubena has been designated to serve as 

USDA’s Rural Health Liaison, a position created by Congress in the 2018 Farm Bill. The role is administered 

by the USDA Rural Development Innovation Center. 

In her role, Kubena will work with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to improve the health of 

rural communities by expanding access to health care and sharing data and information about relevant 

departmental programs with stakeholders, partners and customers. The role ensures that USDA is well 

positioned to address the growing health care needs in rural communities.

Kubena has served as the Acting Rural Health Liaison since 2021. She has also served as the Deputy Chief 

Innovation Officer for USDA Rural Development since 2019. Previously, she served as the Director of the 

Engineering and Environmental Staff for USDA Rural Development’s Water and Environmental Programs in 

the Rural Utilities Service. During her tenure in the Rural Utilities Service, she also served as the Acting 

Assistant Administrator for Water and Environmental Programs in 2017 and the Acting Deputy Assistant 

Administrator for the Telecommunications Program in 2018. Prior to joining USDA, Kubena served in various 

positions at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for 17 years, focusing on risk assessment, water quality 

regulations and sanitation infrastructure. Kubena holds a bachelor’s degree in wildlife and fisheries with a 

minor in oceanography from Texas A&M University. She also holds a master’s degree in fisheries from the 

University of Washington.

Kubena starts her role today. USDA encourages rural health stakeholders to reach out to Kubena in her new role 

to build upon existing partnerships and facilitate new ones.

If you’d like to subscribe to USDA Rural Development updates, visit our GovDelivery subscriber page.

###

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender.
#### § 3.85 Employees.

Every person subject to the Animal Welfare regulations (9 CFR parts 1, 2, and 3) maintaining nonhuman primates must have enough employees to carry out the level of husbandry practices and care required in this subpart. The employees who provide husbandry practices and care, or handle nonhuman primates, must be trained and supervised by an individual who has the knowledge, background, and experience in proper husbandry and care of nonhuman primates to supervise others. The employer must be certain that the supervisor can perform to these standards.
|     |                                                                                       |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| [ ] | Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |

|     |                                                                                        |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| [ ] | Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |

|     |                                                                                                        |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| [ ] | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |

|     |                                                                                                        |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| [ ] | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |

----

|           |                                                                                                                                                    |
|-----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Item 5.02 | Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers. |

----

----

|     |                                                                         |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| By: | /s/ Angelo M. Ninivaggi         |

----

|                |
|----------------|
|                |  |
| Exhibit Number | Description |
| 99.1           | Plexus Corp. Press Release, dated April 20, 2016. |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          38,835
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,042
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,925
<PP&E>                                          21,481
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (7,590)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  56,181
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,944
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        67,989
<OTHER-SE>                                    (38,359)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    56,181
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,621
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,211
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,763
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 964
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,684)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,684)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,656)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,388)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.09)


</TABLE>
### §1530. Awarding of contracts for performance of commercial activity by National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

The Administration may not award any contract for the performance of any "commercial activity", as defined by paragraph 6.a. of the Office of Management and Budget Circular Memorandum A–76, which is performed by Administration employees until at least 30 calendar days after the Administrator of the Administration has presented, in writing, to the President of the Senate, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate, and the Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries and the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives, a full and complete description of such proposed contract, together with supporting documentation. Such documentation shall include—

(1) a comparison of the cost of such activity as performed by employees of the Administration and the cost of such activity as performed under the proposed contract;

(2) a comparison of the services performed by employees of the Administration and the services to be performed under the proposed contract; and

(3) an assessment of the benefits to the Federal Government of proceeding with the proposed contract.

(Pub. L. 99–272, title VI, §6083, Apr. 7, 1986, 100 Stat. 135; Pub. L. 103–437, §5(b)(3), Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4582.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–437 in introductory provisions substituted "Committee on Science, Space, and Technology" for "Committee on Science and Technology" before "of the House".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Abolition of House Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries

Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries of House of Representatives abolished and its jurisdiction transferred by House Resolution No. 6, One Hundred Fourth Congress, Jan. 4, 1995. For treatment of references to Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries, see section 1(b)(3) of Pub. L. 104–14, set out as a note preceding section 21 of Title 2, The Congress.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                        BINDVIEW DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
            STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER COMMON SHARE
                                  (UNAUDITED)
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  QUARTER
                                                             ENDED MARCH 31,
                                                     -----------------------------
                                                        2000               1999
                                                     ----------         ----------

<S>                                                  <C>                <C>
Net loss                                             $   (6,675)        $   (2,611)
                                                     ==========         ==========

Shares used in basis calculation
        Total basic shares                               50,519             45,805

Additional shares for diluted computation:
  Effect of stock options                                 6,281              5,686
  Effect of warrants                                         75                238
  Effect of convertible preferred stock and
    debentures                                            1,409                666
  Exclusion of share equivalents that are
    anti-dilutive because a loss was incurred            (7,765)            (6,590)
                                                     ----------         ----------
        Total diluted shares                             50,519             45,805
                                                     ==========         ==========
Loss per common share
  Basic                                              $    (0.13)        $    (0.06)
  Diluted                                            $    (0.13)        $    (0.06)
</TABLE>
EPA Reg. No . 70506

- 4

Vol. 1

- part 2