alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 390.9 Communications with State and other Federal government agencies. ( a ) The Administrator of the Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS), or designee, may authorize the disclosure of distribution lists (records that show where and when product was shipped) obtained from a firm recalling products, or incorporated into agency-prepared records, to State and other Federal government agencies to verify the removal of the recalled product, provided that: ( 1 ) The State agency has provided both a written statement establishing its authority to protect confidential distribution lists from public disclosure and a written commitment not to disclose any information provided by FSIS, without the written permission of the submitter of the information or written confirmation by FSIS that the information no longer has confidential status. Federal government agencies must provide a written commitment not to disclose the information and to refer any request for distribution lists to FSIS for response; and
( 2 ) The Administrator of FSIS or designee determines that disclosure would be in the interest of public health.
( b ) This provision does not authorize the disclosure to State or other Federal government agencies of trade secret information, unless otherwise provided by law or pursuant to an express written authorization provided by the submitter of the information.
( c ) Information disclosed under this section is not a disclosure of information to the public. Disclosures made under this section do not waive any FOIA exemption protection.
[67 FR 20013, Apr. 24, 2002]
§ 2.100 Compliance with standards. ( a ) Each dealer, exhibitor, operator of an auction sale, and intermediate handler shall comply in all respects with the regulations set forth in part 2 and the standards set forth in part 3 of this subchapter for the humane handling, care, treatment, housing, and transportation of animals.
( b ) Each carrier shall comply in all respects with the regulations in part 2 and the standards in part 3 of this subchapter setting forth the conditions and requirements for the humane transportation of animals in commerce and their handling, care, and treatment in connection therewith.
April 27, 2015

Deborah O’Neal-Johnson, EsquireU.S.Securities and Exchange Commission100 F Street, NEWashington, DC 20549

Re:  T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund, Inc.

 File Nos.: 002-43237/811-2215

 Post-Effective Amendment No. 54

Dear Ms.O’Neal-Johnson:

I am counsel to T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc., which serves asthe sponsor and investment adviser to all outstanding series of the above-referenced registrant. Theregistrant proposes to file the above-referenced Post-Effective Amendment to its registration statementpursuant to Rule 485(b) under the Securities Act of 1933.

I have reviewed the amendmentto the registration statement and represent that it does not contain disclosures that, in my opinion,would render the amendment ineligible to become effective pursuant to Rule 485(b).

Sincerely,

/s/Brian R. PooleBrian R. PooleVice President and Senior Legal Counsel, T. RowePrice Associates, Inc.
EXHIBIT
32
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT
 TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002
 
 In connection
with the annual report on Form 40-F of FirstService Corporation (the “Company”)
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008 (the “Report”) filed with the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Jay S. Hennick,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC. section
1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:
 
 1.
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 2.
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 Dated:  May
21, 2008
  /s/ Jay S.
Hennick
 Jay S. Hennick
 Chief
Executive Officer
  
 CERTIFICATION
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT
 TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002
 
 In connection
with the annual report on Form 40-F of FirstService Corporation (the “Company”)
for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008 (the “Report”) filed with the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, John B.
Friedrichsen, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 USC. section 1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
 
 1.
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 2.
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 Dated:  May
21, 2008
  /s/ John B.
Friedrichsen
 John B.
Friedrichsen
 Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer
### §§656, 656a. Repealed. Pub. L. 92–181, title V, §5.26(a), Dec. 10, 1971, 85 Stat. 624

Section 656, acts July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title I, §3, 39 Stat. 361; Apr. 20, 1920, ch. 154, §1, 41 Stat. 570; Ex. Ord. No. 6084 Mar. 27, 1933; Aug. 19, 1937, ch. 704, §§5(a), 20, 50 Stat. 704, 710; Aug. 18, 1959, Pub. L. 86–168, title I, §101(a), 73 Stat. 384, provided for appointment of registrars, appraisers, and examiners.

Section 656a, act Aug. 19, 1937, ch. 704, §20, 50 Stat. 710, provided for designation of farm credit examiners.
§ 314.10 Livers condemned because of parasitic infestation and for other causes; conditions for disposal for purposes other than human food. ( a ) Livers condemned on account of hydatid cysts shall be disposed of by tanking pursuant to the provisions of § 314.1 of this subchapter if condemned at official establishments having facilities for tanking; otherwise they shall be destroyed pursuant to the provisions of § 314.3 of this subchapter.
( b ) Livers condemned because of parasites other than hydatid cysts; and livers condemned because of telangiectasis, angioma, “sawdust” condition, cirrhosis, carotenosis, or other nonmalignant change, benign abscesses, or contamination, when these conditions are not associated with infectious diseases in the carcasses, may be shipped from an official establishment only for purposes other than human food, and only if all tissue affected with abscesses is removed and destroyed within the establishment, and all livers are processed and denatured, with any agent prescribed in § 325.13(a)(1) or (2) or (5), and in accordance with § 325.13(a)(6) of this subchapter. This provision for movement from an official establishment is made solely under the Federal Meat Inspection Act and is not intended to relieve or modify any other applicable requirements under any other law regarding the movement of such articles, for purposes other than use as human food.
( c ) Livers condemned because of conditions described in paragraph (b) of this section shall be in containers plainly marked “inedible”.
[41 FR 23701, June 11, 1976]
UAVSA Release 1.4 2015

Company Protocol

1. All participants are required to call out “Safety First” it they spot a problem 

or danger.

2. The Company expects and requires all individuals to be sober of mind and 

body.

3. A zero tolerance for all drugs and alcohol will be applied to everyone on 

location representing Company and any other participants.

4. All Company crew and staff involved with any and all UAS services are 

expected to have thoroughly reviewed the project, schedule, and project 

list prior to project.

5. All Company employees are expected to follow all Company protocols and 

Checklists. 

6. Be on location on time.

7. Communicate all of the time with everyone involved in flight operations.

8. Always make “Safety First” and have first aid kit at all operation locations.

9. Never leave UAS batteries spent, charged or otherwise loose at any 

location and properly dispose of all failed batteries through proper 

channels.

10.Company staff and personnel must always maintain and high degree of 

professionalism, meaning following the Operations and Protocols as 

present by the PIC and or Location Director. 

11.Never leave locations until area has been fully policed and all trash, debris 

or disorder has been cleaned.

12.Report any unlawful or illegal request or action immediately to Company 

directors and/or authorities. 

13.Inspect, clean, organize, package, and take inventory of all UAS Company 

equipment at the completion of project. 

14.Never leave fuel, matches, or any combustibles at locations.

15.Report lost or questionable misplaced equipment, supplies or other 

Company items of importance such as documents, logs, maps, etc.
#### § 53.9 Mortgage against animals, eggs, or materials.

When animals, eggs, or materials have been destroyed pursuant to the requirements contained in this part, any claim for indemnity shall be presented on forms furnished by APHIS on which the owner of the animals, eggs, or materials shall certify that the animals, eggs, or materials covered thereby, are, or are not, subject to any mortgage as defined in this part. If the owner states there is a mortgage, forms furnished by APHIS shall be signed by the owner and by each person holding a mortgage on the animals, eggs, or materials, consenting to the payment of any indemnity allowed to the person specified thereon.

[28 FR 5935, June 13, 1963, as amended at 56 FR 51974, Oct. 17, 1991; 81 FR 6750, Feb. 9, 2016]
#### § 317.12 Relabeling products; requirements.

When it is claimed by an official establishment that any of its products which bore labels bearing official marks has been transported to a location other than an official establishment, and it is desired to relabel the product because the labels have become mutilated or otherwise damaged, a request for relabeling the product shall be sent to the Administrator, accompanied with a statement of the reasons therefor. Labeling material intended for relabeling inspected and passed product shall not be transported from an official establishment until permission has been received from the Administrator. The relabeling of inspected and passed product with labels bearing any official marks shall be done under the supervision of a Program inspector. The official establishment shall reimburse the Program, in accordance with the regulations of the Department, for any cost involved in supervising the relabeling of such product.
# C_2011013EN.01004303.xml

| 15.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/43

---

Action brought on 2 November 2010 — Trentea v FRA

(Case F-112/10)

()

2011/C 13/88

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Cornelia Trentea (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: L. Levi and M.Vandenbussche, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA)

Defendant:

The subject matter and description of the proceedings

The subject matter and description of the proceedings

First, annulment of the decision of the Authority Responsible for Concluding Contracts of Employment rejecting the Appellant's candidature for a post of administrative assistant in the procurement and finance fields and of the decision appointing another candidate. Second, compensation for material and non-material loss.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the Decision of the Authority Responsible for Concluding Contracts of Employment of 5 June 2010 rejecting the Appellant's candidature for post (ref. TAADMIN-AST4-2009) and the Decision appointing another candidate; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Decision of the Authority Responsible for Concluding Contracts of Employment of 5 June 2010 rejecting the Appellant's candidature for post (ref. TAADMIN-AST4-2009) and the Decision appointing another candidate;

| — | If necessary, annul the Decision of 22 July 2010 rejecting the Appellant's complaint and of the Decision of 27 September 2010 rejecting the Appellant's Request for review and Completion to the Complaint; |
| --- | --- |

—

If necessary, annul the Decision of 22 July 2010 rejecting the Appellant's complaint and of the Decision of 27 September 2010 rejecting the Appellant's Request for review and Completion to the Complaint;

| — | Order that the Defendant compensates the Appellant's material prejudice corresponding to the difference between her current salary and the AST4 salary, until retirement age, including all allocations and indemnities and compensation of pension rights; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order that the Defendant compensates the Appellant's material prejudice corresponding to the difference between her current salary and the AST4 salary, until retirement age, including all allocations and indemnities and compensation of pension rights;

| — | Order that the Defendant compensates the Appellant's moral prejudice evaluated ex aequo et bono at 10 000 Euro; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order that the Defendant compensates the Appellant's moral prejudice evaluated ex aequo et bono at 10 000 Euro;

| — | order that the Defendant pays all costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order that the Defendant pays all costs.

---
#### § 93.219 Declaration for poultry.

For all poultry offered for importation from Mexico, the importer or his or her agent shall present two copies of a declaration as provided in § 93.206.

[55 FR 31495, Aug. 2, 1990. Redesignated and amended at 62 FR 56012, 56016, Oct. 28, 1997]
### §2702. Training

The Coast Guard may make expenditures for the training of personnel, including books, school supplies, correspondence courses, motion picture equipment, and other equipment for instructional purposes.

(Aug. 4, 1949, ch. 393, 63 Stat. 531, §469; renumbered §2702, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §116(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4226.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on the following language contained in the Coast Guard appropriation act for 1949, "Pay and Allowances" and preceding years: "motion picture and other equipment for instructional purposes; . . . training of enlisted personnel, including textbooks, school supplies, and correspondence courses;" (June 19, 1948, 62 Stat. 562).

Changes were made in phraseology. 81st Congress, House Report No. 557.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2702 was renumbered section 4902 of this title.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 469 of this title as this section.
# C_2010080EN.01003601.xml

| 27.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 80/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 80/36

---

Action brought on 19 January 2010 — Steinberg v Commission

(Case T-17/10)

2010/C 80/60

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Gerald Steinberg (Jerusalem, Israel) (represented by: T. Asserson, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | annulment of the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annulment of the contested decision;

| — | disclosure within 15 days of all documents specified in the application; |
| --- | --- |

—

disclosure within 15 days of all documents specified in the application;

| — | award for costs; |
| --- | --- |

—

award for costs;

| — | any other relief which the Court deems appropriate. |
| --- | --- |

—

any other relief which the Court deems appropriate.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

By means of this application the applicant seeks annulment of the Commission decision of 15 May 2009, received by the applicant on 22 November 2009, partially rejecting his request, pursuant to Regulation No 1049/2001 (1), of the access to documents related to funding decisions for grants to Israeli and Palestinian non-governmental organisations for the past three years under the ‘Partnership for Peace’ (PfP) and ‘European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights’ (EIDHR) programmes.

1

In support of its application the applicant puts forward four pleas in law.

First, the applicant contends that, by not providing the access to the requested documents, the defendant acted in violation of Article 2 of Regulation No 1049/2001.

Second, the applicant argues that by refusing full access to the requested documents the defendant acted in violation of Article 4 of Regulation No 1049/2001 as his request does not fall within the scope of any of the exceptions provided for in this article. Further, the applicant submits that, even if the exceptions would be applicable to his request, quod non, the right to access by the civil society organisations to the requested documents should be considered as constituting ‘overriding public interest in disclosure’.

quod non

Third, the applicant claims that by taking almost six months to respond to his confirmatory application despite the fact that Regulation No 1049/2001 required providing a response within 15 working days from the request, the defendant acted in violation of Article 7 of Regulation No 1049/2001.

Fourth, the applicant contends that the defendant failed to carry out an examination of the request ‘promptly’ and therefore acted in violation of Article 8 of Regulation No 1049/2001.

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents, OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of WNC Housing Tax Credit
Fund IV, L.P., Series 1 (the "Partnership") for the year ended March 31, 2005 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  and  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.,  section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2003,  I,  Wilfred N.  Cooper,  Jr.,
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner
of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  except to the extent
          that such  provisions  require the filing of an opinion of  registered
          public   accountants   to  accompany   the   Partnership's   financial
          statements; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Partnership.




/s/WILFRED N. COOPER, JR.
-------------------------
Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
November 21, 2005
Exhibit




Exhibit 10.28.1
Third Point Reinsurance Ltd.
Schedule of Signatories to the Director and Officer Indemnification Agreement


John R. Berger
J. Robert Bredahl
Nicholas Campbell
Christopher S. Coleman
Christopher L. Collins
Steve Elliot Fass
Rafe de la Gueronniere
Manoj K. Gupta
Mary R. Hennessy
Daniel V. Malloy
Jonathan Norton
Mark Parkin
William L. Spiegel
Joshua L. Targoff
Anthony Urban
Thomas Wafer *
Gary D. Walters
Janice R. Weidenborner


*In his capacity as President of Third Point Reinsurance (USA) Ltd.
# C_2010328EN.01002201.xml

| 4.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/22

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat des Landes Vorarlberg (Austria) lodged on 1 October 2010 — ‘projektart’ Errichtungsges mbH, Eva Maria Pepic and Herbert Hilbe v Grundverkehrs-Landeskommission Vorarlberg

(Case C-476/10)

()

2010/C 328/38

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat des Landes Vorarlberg

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants:‘projektart’ Errichtungsges mbH, Eva Pepic and Herbert Hilbe

Applicants:

Defendant: Grundverkehrs-Landeskommission Vorarlberg

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Is Article 6(4) of Directive 88/361/EEC (1) of 24 June 1988 for the implementation of Article 67 of the Treaty, according to which existing national legislation regulating purchases of secondary residences may be upheld, still applicable to the purchase of secondary residences situated in a Member State of the EU by a national of the Principality of Liechtenstein, which forms part of the EEA? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is Article 6(4) of Directive 88/361/EEC (1) of 24 June 1988 for the implementation of Article 67 of the Treaty, according to which existing national legislation regulating purchases of secondary residences may be upheld, still applicable to the purchase of secondary residences situated in a Member State of the EU by a national of the Principality of Liechtenstein, which forms part of the EEA?

1

| 2. | Does national legislation which, on the basis of Article 6(4) of Council Directive 88/361/EEC of 24 June 1988, prohibits a national of the Principality of Liechtenstein from purchasing a secondary residence situated in a Member State of the EU conflict with the provisions of the EEA Agreement concerning the free movement of capital, so that a national authority must disregard such national legislation? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Does national legislation which, on the basis of Article 6(4) of Council Directive 88/361/EEC of 24 June 1988, prohibits a national of the Principality of Liechtenstein from purchasing a secondary residence situated in a Member State of the EU conflict with the provisions of the EEA Agreement concerning the free movement of capital, so that a national authority must disregard such national legislation?

---

(1)  OJ 1988 L 178, p. 5.

1

---
#### § 700.541 Fraud or false statement in a Government matter.

“Whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States, knowingly or wilfully falsifies, conceals or covers up by a trick, scheme or device a material fact, or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain false, fictitious or fraudulent statement or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than 5 years or both (18 U.S.C. 1001).” Special attention is required in the certification of time and attendance reports, applications for employment, personnel security forms, requests for travel reimbursement, client certification documents, and purchase orders and receiving forms.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                     CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

      This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal
Procedures) of the United States Code and shall not be relied on by any person
for any other purpose.

      The undersigned, who is the Chief Financial Officer of S1 Corporation (the
"Company"), hereby certifies as follows:

      To the knowledge of the undersigned, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
the Company (the "Report"), which accompanies this Certificate, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, and all information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

      Dated this 9th day of August 2004.

                                           /s/ MATTHEW HALE
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Matthew Hale, Chief Financial Officer