alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §5511. Purpose, objectives, and functions

#### (a) Purpose

The Bureau shall seek to implement and, where applicable, enforce Federal consumer financial law consistently for the purpose of ensuring that all consumers have access to markets for consumer financial products and services and that markets for consumer financial products and services are fair, transparent, and competitive.

#### (b) Objectives

The Bureau is authorized to exercise its authorities under Federal consumer financial law for the purposes of ensuring that, with respect to consumer financial products and services—

(1) consumers are provided with timely and understandable information to make responsible decisions about financial transactions;

(2) consumers are protected from unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts and practices and from discrimination;

(3) outdated, unnecessary, or unduly burdensome regulations are regularly identified and addressed in order to reduce unwarranted regulatory burdens;

(4) Federal consumer financial law is enforced consistently, without regard to the status of a person as a depository institution, in order to promote fair competition; and

(5) markets for consumer financial products and services operate transparently and efficiently to facilitate access and innovation.

#### (c) Functions

The primary functions of the Bureau are—

(1) conducting financial education programs;

(2) collecting, investigating, and responding to consumer complaints;

(3) collecting, researching, monitoring, and publishing information relevant to the functioning of markets for consumer financial products and services to identify risks to consumers and the proper functioning of such markets;

(4) subject to sections 5514 through 5516 of this title, supervising covered persons for compliance with Federal consumer financial law, and taking appropriate enforcement action to address violations of Federal consumer financial law;

(5) issuing rules, orders, and guidance implementing Federal consumer financial law; and

(6) performing such support activities as may be necessary or useful to facilitate the other functions of the Bureau.

(Pub. L. 111–203, title X, §1021, July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 1979.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 111–203, title X, §1029A, July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 2005, provided that: "This subtitle [subtitle B (§§1021–1029A), enacting this part] shall become effective on the designated transfer date, except that sections 1022, 1024, and 1025(e) [12 U.S.C. 5512, 5514, and 5515(e)] shall become effective on the date of enactment of this Act [July 21, 2010]."

[The term "designated transfer date" is defined in section 5481(9) of this title as the date established under section 5582 of this title.]
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2012 - 0216 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 2010 - SW - 025 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-60639 Summary Calendar

JAMES NORRIS WALKER, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JIMMY MCGUIRE; HERMAN COX, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 1:96-CV-90-Br-R

- - - - - - - - - - April 8, 1997 Before SMITH, DUHE’ and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * James Norris Walker, Mississippi state prisoner #76462, has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal. The motion to proceed IFP is GRANTED. Although Walker is unable to pay the initial financial filing fee, the agency having custody of Walker is directed to forward payments from his account to theNo. 96-60639 - 2 - clerk of the district court each time the amount in Walker’s account exceeds $10 until the filing fee is paid. Walker argues that the district court abused its discretion in dismissing his complaint as frivolous because his counsel conspired with state officials to deprive Walker of his constitutional rights by testifying against Walker at his criminal trial. The district court dismissed the complaint as frivolous pursuant to Heck v. Humphrey , 114 S. Ct. 2364 (1994) because it determined that Walker’s allegations called into question the validity of Walker’s conviction. We have reviewed the record and have determined that Walker’s limited allegations do not demonstrate whether Walker was convicted at the trial during which counsel testified or, if so, whether Walker is presently incarcerated as a result of such conviction. Walker’s allegations that his counsel conspired with state actors to deprive him of a constitutional right are not totally baseless or delusional. The district court abused its discretion in dismissing Walker’s complaint as frivolous at this stage of the proceeding. See Denton v. Hernandez , 504 U.S. 25, 32-33 (1992). We intimate no view as to the ultimate merits of this claim. We hold merely that on the record before us we cannot conclude that this claim has no arguable basis either in law or in fact. The district court’s judgment is VACATED and the caseNo. 96-60639 - 3 - is REMANDED for further development of Walker’s claims consistent with this opinion.
IFP GRANTED; VACATE AND REMAND.
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: October 15, 2014 

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602 

FROM: Chris Sherry, EPA 

SUBJECT: October 10, 2014 Meeting Regarding Proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing 

Power Plants 

SUMMARY 

A meeting was held by telephone between EPA staff and staff of the American Council for an 

Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE). The call addressed clarifying questions about the 

enforceability provisions in the proposal. 

ATTENDEES 

ACEEE 

Sara Hayes, Senior Manager and Researcher 

US EPA 

Chris Sherry OAR, OAP, Climate Change Division
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the**

**Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Peter I. Cittadini, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that theQuarterly Report of Actuate Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Actuate Corporation. 

 

Dated:  August 14, 2003 

 

/S/    PETER I. CITTADINI

----
Warning Sign

May Be Invo

preferences, are also commo

Parents are encouraged to f

symbols, seek help early, and 

local law enforcement, faith le

additio

• Admits to "hanging ou

with kids in gangs

• Shows an unusual

interest in one or two

particular colors of

clothing or a particula

logo

• Has an unusual interes

in gangster-influenced

music, videos, movies,

or websites.

• Uses unusual hand

signals to communicat

with friends

• Has specific drawings 

gang symbols on scho

books, clothes, walls, 

tattoos

• Comes home with

unexplained physical

injuries (fighting-relate

bruises, injuries to

hand/knuckles)

• Has unexplained cash 

goods, such as clothin

or jewelry
• Get involved in your

child's school activitie

• Be a positive role mod

and set the right

example 

• Know your child's

friends and their

families

• Encourage good study

habits

• Teach your child how t

cope with peer pressu

• Help your child develo

good conflict/resolutio

skills (See

www.safeyouth.org/sc

pts/teens/conflict.asp)

• Encourage your child t

participate in positive

afterschool activities

with adult supervision

(recreation centers,

organized sports, yout

groups)

www.cops.usdoj.gov 

w

To obtain details on 

COPS Office Respo
#### Mary Fischer, Administratrix, etc., of Charles J. Fischer, Deceased, Appellant, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company and New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company, Respondents.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Present—Woodward, Jenks, Gaynor, Rich and Miller, JJ.
### Part A—Commercial or Industrial Lease and Qualified Contract Guarantees
<PAGE>   1





                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                          TATHAM OFFSHORE SUBSIDIARIES

Tatham Offshore, Inc., a Delaware corporation
   Tatham Offshore Development, Inc., a Delaware corporation
   Tatham Offshore Canada Limited, a Nova Scotia company
   Tatham Offshore (Jersey) Ltd., a company organized under the laws of Jersey
   North Atlantic Pipeline Company, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company
      North Atlantic Pipeline (Nova Scotia) Company, U.L.C., a Nova Scotia 
        unlimited liability company
      North Atlantic Pipeline Partners, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
      North Atlantic Pipeline Partners, L.P., a Newfoundland limited partnership
Exhibit 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of SUNBURST ACQUISITIONS V, INC.
(the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending July 31, 2005, (the "Report"), I, Jay
Lutsky, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)	The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the Company's financial position and results of
operations.


August 10, 2005

	/s/ Jay Lutsky
	Chief Executive Officer and
	Chief Financial and
	Accounting Officer
#### § 582.2 Who may appeal the disapproval of a gaming ordinance?

Only the tribe whose gaming ordinance, resolution, or amendment thereto is disapproved by the Chair may appeal.
121 STAT. 68 PUBLIC LAW 110–13—MAR. 21, 2007

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 342:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 110–10 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007):

Feb. 12, considered and passed House.

Mar. 9, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 110–13

110th Congress

An Act

To designate the United States courthouse located at 555 Independence Street

in Cape Girardeau, Missouri, as the ‘‘Rush Hudson Limbaugh, Sr. United States

Courthouse’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RUSH HUDSON LIMBAUGH, SR. UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE.

(a) DESIGNATION.—The United States courthouse located at

555 Independence Street in Cape Girardeau, Missouri, shall be

known and designated as the ‘‘Rush Hudson Limbaugh, Sr. United

States Courthouse’’.

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation,

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the United

States courthouse referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed

to be a reference to the ‘‘Rush Hudson Limbaugh, Sr. United States

Courthouse’’.

Approved March 21, 2007.

Mar. 21, 2007

[H.R. 342]
#### § 201.45 Market agencies to make records available for inspection by owners, consignors, and purchasers.

Each market agency engaged in the business of selling or buying livestock on a commission or agency basis shall, on request from an owner, consignor, or purchaser, make available copies of bills covering charges paid by such market agency for and on behalf of the owner, consignor, or purchaser which were deducted from the gross proceeds of the sale of livestock or added to the purchase price thereof when accounting for the sale or purchase.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0580-0015)

(7 U.S.C. 181 *et seq.;* Pub. L. 96-511, 94 Stat. 2812 (44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.*))

[19 FR 4528, July 22, 1954, as amended at 44 FR 45361, Aug. 2, 1979; 47 FR 746, Jan. 7, 1982; 54 FR 26349, June 23, 1989; 68 FR 75388, Dec. 31, 2003]
#### § 561.1 Rules of practice governing inspection actions.

The rules of practice in part 500 of this chapter, governing inspection actions taken by FSIS with respect to establishments and products, apply to actions taken with respect to fish slaughter, fish processing, fish, and fish products regulated under this subchapter.
### **CHAPTER 115—PERFLUOROALKYL AND POLYFLUOROALKYL SUBSTANCES AND EMERGING CONTAMINANTS**

Sec.
8901.
Definition of Administrator.

#### SUBCHAPTER I—DRINKING WATER

8911.
Monitoring and detection.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—PFAS RELEASE DISCLOSURE

8921.
Additions to toxics release inventory.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—USGS PERFORMANCE STANDARD

8931.
Definitions.
8932.
Performance standard for the detection of highly fluorinated compounds.
8933.
Nationwide sampling.
8934.
Data usage.
8935.
Collaboration.

#### SUBCHAPTER IV—EMERGING CONTAMINANTS

8951.
Definitions.
8952.
Research and coordination plan for enhanced response on emerging contaminants.

#### SUBCHAPTER V—OTHER MATTERS

8961.
PFAS destruction and disposal guidance.
8962.
PFAS research and development.
8963.
Interagency body on research related to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1710

MATTHEW J. BENNETT, Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (CA-04-705-7-GEC) Submitted: November 22, 2005 Decided: December 1, 2005 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed in part; dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion. Matthew J. Bennett, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen M. Wolfinger, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Matthew J. Bennett appeals from the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint in which he requested that the district court enjoin the withholding of federal income tax from his wages pursuant to instructions from the Internal Revenue Service to his employer, and denying his motion for reconsideration pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). We affirm in part and dismiss in part. When the United States or its officer or agency is a party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corr. , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court’s order dismissing the complaint was entered on the docket on March 29, 2005. The notice of appeal was filed on June 21, 2005. Because Bennett failed to file a timely notice of appeal from the dismissal order or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss this portion of the appeal.- 3 - Bennett’s notice of appeal was timely, however, with respect to the district court’s June 9, 2005, order denying his motion for reconsideration of the dismissal. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion denying the motion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm this order for the reasons stated by the district court. Bennett v. United States , No. CA-04-705-7-GEC (W.D. Va. filed June 9, 2005; entered June 10, 2005). Additionally, we deny the United States’ motion for sanctions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART
#### §§ 78.15-78.19 [Reserved]
### §402. Providing business data to Designated Statistical Agencies

The Bureau of the Census may provide business data to the Bureau of Economic Analysis and the Bureau of Labor Statistics ("Designated Statistical Agencies") if such information is required for an authorized statistical purpose and the provision is the subject of a written agreement with that Designated Statistical Agency, or their successors, as defined in section 3576(e) of title 44.

(Added Pub. L. 107–347, title V, §526(b)(1), Dec. 17, 2002, 116 Stat. 2969; amended Pub. L. 115–435, title III, §302(c)(2), Jan. 14, 2019, 132 Stat. 5553.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2019—Pub. L. 115–435 substituted "section 3576(e) of title 44" for "the Confidential Information Protection and Statistical Efficiency Act of 2002".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2019 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–435 effective 180 days after Jan. 14, 2019, see section 403 of Pub. L. 115–435, set out as a note under section 306 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### Transitional and Savings Provisions

For transitional and savings provisions related to the amendment of this section and other provisions of law by title III of Pub. L. 115–435, see section 302(d) of Pub. L. 115–435, set out as a note under section 3561 of Title 44, Public Printing and Documents.
EXHIBIT 99.2  CERTIFICATION FOR ANNUAL REPORTS ON FORM 10-K

I, Anthony Contos, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Asante' Technologies, Inc.
("Registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Registrant and we have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
Registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal controls; and

6. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual
report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: January 9, 2002

                                         /s/ ANTHONY CONTOS
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Anthony Contos, Chief Financial Officer