alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 23.1


                        Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement 
(Form S-8 No. 333-23313) pertaining to the Canmax Inc. Stock Option Plan and 
the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-33523) pertaining to 863,364 
shares of Canmax Inc. common stock, of our report dated December 18, 1997, 
except for note 16, as to which the date is February 11, 1998, with respect 
to the consolidated financial statements of Canmax Inc. included in the 
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended October 31, 1997.

                                       /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Dallas, Texas
February 11, 1998
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION








Each of the undersigned hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Columbus
McKinnon Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December
28, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.








Dated:  February  5,
2009











/s/ Timothy T.
Tevens


Timothy
T. Tevens


Chief
Executive Officer











/s/ Karen L.
Howard


Karen L.
Howard


Chief
Financial Officer


(Principal Financial
Officer)
-80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 38

 40

 42

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲

▲

▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

08/01

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 01 Aug 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.81 N 76.74 W Meters AGL
Exhibit 32.2

                              CERTIFICATION OF THE

              EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

                             PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with the Report on Form 10-Q for the period  ended June 30,
2006 of KeySpan  Corporation (the  "Corporation"),  as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Gerald Luterman,
Executive  Vice  President  and  Chief  Financial  Officer  of the  Corporation,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:    August 3, 2006


                                                  /s/Gerald Luterman
                                                  ------------------------
                                                  Gerald Luterman
                                                  Executive Vice President
                                                  and Chief Financial Officer
#### § 354.231 Accessibility.

All equipment shall be so placed as to be readily accessible for all processing and cleaning operations.
Exhibit 14.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form F-3 (No. 333-111779) and Form F-4/A
(No. 333-112948) of Millicom International Cellular S.A. of our report dated March 31, 2004, except for Note 31 as to which the date is April 30, 2004, relating to
the financial statements, which appears in this Form 20-F/A.

|PricewaterhouseCoopers S.à r.l. |  | Luxembourg, January 12, 2005
|------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------

---



QuickLinks
### §709. Maritime instruction

The Coast Guard may, when so requested by proper authority, detail members for duty in connection with maritime instruction and training by the several States, Territories, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, and when requested by the Maritime Administrator, detail individuals in the Coast Guard for duty in connection with maritime instruction and training by the United States. The service rendered by any individual so detailed shall be considered Coast Guard duty.

(Aug. 4, 1949, ch. 393, 63 Stat. 507, §148; Pub. L. 97–31, §12(4), Aug. 6, 1981, 95 Stat. 154; Pub. L. 98–557, §15(a)(3)(D), Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 2865; renumbered §709, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §106(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4203; Pub. L. 116–283, div. G, title LVXXXV [LXXXV], §8505(a)(8), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4748.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 14, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §49 (Aug. 4, 1939, ch. 416, 53 Stat. 1181).

Changes were made in phraseology. 81st Congress, House Report No. 557.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 709 was renumbered section 3709 of this title.

A prior section 709a was renumbered section 3710 of this title.

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 116–283 substituted "individuals" for "persons" and "individual" for "person".

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 148 of this title as this section.

1984—Pub. L. 98–557 substituted reference to members for reference to officers and enlisted men.

1981—Pub. L. 97–31 substituted "Maritime Administrator" for "United States Maritime Commission".
AVAQMD Rule 1101 – Secondary Lead Smelting/Sulfur Oxides B - 3

Final Staff Report, 10/2/2012 2.
#### § 548.8 Polluted water contamination at establishment.

In the event that there is polluted water (including but not limited to flood water) in an official establishment, all products and ingredients for use in the preparation of the products that have been rendered adulterated by the water must be condemned. After the polluted water has receded from the establishment, the establishment must follow the cleaning and sanitizing procedures in § 318.4 of this chapter.
§ 17.125 Effect of other requirements. ( a ) *Effect of other Federal provisions.* The obligations imposed by these Title IX regulations are independent of, and do not alter, obligations not to discriminate on the basis of sex imposed by Executive Order 11246, 3 CFR, 1964-1965 Comp., p. 339; as amended by Executive Order 11375, 3 CFR, 1966-1970 Comp., p. 684; as amended by Executive Order 11478, 3 CFR, 1966-1970 Comp., p. 803; as amended by Executive Order 12087, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 230; as amended by Executive Order 12107, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 264; sections 704 and 855 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 295m, 298b-2); Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e *et seq.*); the Equal Pay Act of 1963 (29 U.S.C. 206); and any other Act of Congress or Federal regulation.
( b ) *Effect of State or local law or other requirements.* The obligation to comply with these Title IX regulations is not obviated or alleviated by any State or local law or other requirement that would render any applicant or student ineligible, or limit the eligibility of any applicant or student, on the basis of sex, to practice any occupation or profession.
( c ) *Effect of rules or regulations of private organizations.* The obligation to comply with these Title IX regulations is not obviated or alleviated by any rule or regulation of any organization, club, athletic or other league, or association that would render any applicant or student ineligible to participate or limit the eligibility or participation of any applicant or student, on the basis of sex, in any education program or activity operated by a recipient and that receives Federal financial assistance.
USDA 농촌 진흥청:

미국 농촌 지역의 

재해 복구 파트너

함께 번영하는 미국

USDA 농촌 진흥청은 농촌 경제 개발을 지원하기 

위해 70개 이상의 대출, 보조금, 대출 보증 및 

기술지원 프로그램을 제공합니다. 저희 프로그램의 

대부분은 매우 작은 지역사회, 소외된 그룹 및 

경제적으로 어려운 지역에 대한 자금 지원을 

우선시합니다.

지원은 “농촌 지역”으로 지정된 지역에서 일정 

자격을 충족하는 신청자에게 제공됩니다. 연방법에 

따라 “농촌 지역”의 정의는 각 프로그램마다 

다릅니다. 정확한 정보는 언제나 rd.usda.gov에서 

제공되는 해당 프로그램의 규정을 참조하십시오.

rd.usda.gov

1(800) 670-6553 (수신자 부담)

비상 급수 시스템 수리

안전한 식수는 농촌 사회에 필수적입니다. 식수 

공급이 비상 사태로 위협을 받는 경우, 비상 

지역사회 급수 지원 보조금을 받을 자격이 있을 

수 있습니다. 자금은 수로를 수리하거나 새로운 

수원을 개발하는 데 사용할 수 있습니다. 연방 

재난 선언이 적용되어야 할 필요가 없습니다.

농촌 지역 사업

농촌 지역 사업의 요구사항에 맞는 USDA 자금 

조달을 통해 중소기업을 복원하고 지원하는 

데 있어 귀하와 협력하게 된 것을 자랑스럽게 

생각합니다. 저희는 민간 부문 대출 파트너와 

협력하여 재해가 발생한 후의 장비, 운영자본, 

재융자 등 다양한 비즈니스 요구 사항에 대한 자금 

조달을 지원할 수 있습니다.

소규모 및 신규 사업을 위해 지역 비영리 단체 

및 공공 기관에서 운영하는 회전 대출 프로그램 

및 기술지원 프로그램을 통한 자금 조달도 

제공합니다.

USDA는 기회균등을 보장하는 제공업체, 고용주이자 대출 기관입니다.

PA-2247 | 2022년 8월
USDA 농촌 진흥청은 자격을 충족하는 농촌 

가족 및 사업체에 기반시설 개선 및 복원 자금을 

제공함으로써 건강한 지역사회와 환경을 

지원합니다. 이러한 프로그램은 산불, 홍수 또는 

허리케인과 같은 재난 후에는 특히 중요하며, 

농촌 지역사회의 꿈을 복원하고 다시 불붙이는 데 

도움이 될 수 있습니다. 재난 후 지역사회 재건을 

돕는 것 외에도 저희는 계획 및 대비를 통한 

복원력을 강화하기 위해, 지역 지도자 및 개발자, 

주 및 부족 정부, 협동 조합, 비영리 단체, 민간 

조직과 협력합니다. 다른 일들도 하고 있지만, 저희 

프로그램은 다음 부문을 지원하고 있습니다: 

농촌 지역 주택소유자 및 임대 

세입자

저희는 안정적이고 저렴한 주택이 작은 마을의 

건강과 번영에 도움이 된다는 것을 알고 있습니다. 

USDA는 저소득 주택소유자가 재해 피해로부터 

회복할 수 있도록 대출 및 (연령 제한) 보조금을 

제공합니다.

USDA 농촌 주택 융자를 받은 재해 피해자는 

고객 서비스 센터에 연락하여 납입금 감축, 모기지 

모라토리엄 또는 워크아웃 계약과 같은 옵션에 

대해 알아볼 수 있습니다. 월요일~금요일, 오전 7시

~오후 5시(중부 표준시)에 (800) 414-1226번으로 

담당자와 연락하실 수 있습니다.

자연 재해로 인해 USDA 농촌 진흥청 융자를 

받은 다가구 주택에서 이사를 나가게 된 경우, 

LOPE(우선 배치 증서)를 사용하여 다른 농촌 

진흥청 융자의 다가구 주택에 우선적으로 배치될 

수 있습니다. 특정 상황에서 USDA는 보증금, 연령 

제한 또는 임대 요건을 면제할 수도 있습니다. 

자세한 내용은 https://go.usa.gov/xS9DC를 

참조하십시오.

농촌 커뮤니티

저희의 커뮤니티 시설 프로그램은 재해의 영향을 

받은 다양한 건물을 수리하거나 재건하는 데 

도움을 줄 수 있습니다. 예를 들면 보건소, 학교, 

시립 및 초기대응 시설, 푸드 뱅크가 있습니다. 

또한 손상된 공공 서비스 차량 및 장비를 교체하는 

데 도움을 드릴 수 있습니다.

물, 폐수, 우수 및 고형 폐기물 처리 시스템을 

구축하거나 개선하는 데 도움을 받을 수 있습니다. 

기금은 또한 일정 자격을 충족한 전기 및 통신 

시스템의 수리 또는 개선을 지원할 수 있습니다.

• 임시 주택 및 주택 수리

• 인프라 및 비상 장비 자금 조달

• 필수 커뮤니티 시설

• 원격 의료, 원격 교육 및 농촌 광대역 연결

• 농촌 사업 계획 및 복구

또한 연방 비상사태 관리 기관(FEMA) 및 

중소기업청(SBA)과 협력하여 지정된 재해 지역의 

복구를 위한 노력을 지원합니다.
### **CHAPTER 9A—WEATHER MODIFICATION ACTIVITIES OR ATTEMPTS; REPORTING REQUIREMENT**

Sec.
330.
Definitions.
330a.
Report requirement; form; information; time of submission.
330b.
Duties of Secretary.
330c.
Authority of Secretary.
330d.
Violation; penalty.
330e.
Authorization of appropriations.
#### § 381.163 “(Kind) baked” or “(Kind) roasted.”

Such product consists of ready-to-cook poultry of the kind indicated, that has been cooked in dry source heat, e.g., oven roasted or oven baked.
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Seeks Applications for Loans and Grants to Support Rural 

Microenterprises

WASHINGTON, July 30, 2021 – U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Deputy Under Secretary for Rural 

Development Justin Maxson today announced that the department is accepting applications for loan and grants 

to support rural microenterprises.

The funding is being provided through USDA’s Rural Microentrepreneur Assistance Program (RMAP).

RMAP provides loans and grants to a non-profit entity, tribe or institution of higher education as a

Microenterprise Development Organization (MDO) to establish revolving loan funds to provide loans to rural

microloan borrowers and micro entrepreneurs. The funds also may be used to provide training and technical 

assistance to microentrepreneurs. To be eligible for a loan from an MDO, an ultimate recipient must be a 

business with 10 or fewer full-time employees and be located in a non-metropolitan rural area with a population 

of 50,000 or less.

Applications are being accepted in the Rural Development State Office where the project is located.

For additional information and for application deadlines, see page 41004 of the July 30 Federal Register.

If you’d like to subscribe to USDA Rural Development updates, visit our GovDelivery subscriber page. 

###

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****Gulf of MexicoOCS oil and gas lease sales, 2007-2012: western planning area sales 204, 207,210, 215, and 218; central planning area sales 205, 206, 208, 213, 216, and 222: draft environmental impact statement**** 
SuDocNumber:I72.12/11:2006-062/
ItemNumber:0671-F(online)
CGPSystem Number:000601184
 
Vol. I
Vol. II
 
 **
# C_2010260EN.01002801.xml

| 25.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/28

---

Action brought on 20 July 2010 — Barthel and Others v Court of Justice

(Case F-59/10)

()

2010/C 260/38

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Yvette Barthel (Arlon, Belgium) and Others (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Court of Justice

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of the Court of Justice rejecting the claim by the applicants for payment of the allowance for continuous work or shiftwork provided for in the first indent of Article 1(1) of Council Regulation (ECSC, EEC, Euratom) No 300/76 of 9 February 1976, determining the categories of officials entitled to allowances for shiftwork, and the rates and conditions thereof (OJ 1976 L 38, p. 1)

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Registrar of the Court of Justice of the European Union rejecting the applicants’ claim of 8 June 2009 for payment, as from 20 December 2006, of the allowance for continuous work or shiftwork provided for in the first indent of Article 1(1) of Council Regulation (ECSC, EEC, Euratom) No 300/76 of 9 February 1976; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Registrar of the Court of Justice of the European Union rejecting the applicants’ claim of 8 June 2009 for payment, as from 20 December 2006, of the allowance for continuous work or shiftwork provided for in the first indent of Article 1(1) of Council Regulation (ECSC, EEC, Euratom) No 300/76 of 9 February 1976;

| — | order the Court of Justice to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Court of Justice to pay the costs.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-50365

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LUIS ALONSO FERRUFINO-RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:13-CR-906-1

Before KING, JOLLY and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Luis Alonso Ferrufino-Rodriguez (Ferrufino) was sentenced to a 52-

month term of imprisonment following his guilty plea to illegal reentry of a 

deported alien. See 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He challenges the substantive 

reasonableness of his sentence, arguing that it is greater than necessary to 

satisfy the goals of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) because the Sentencing Guidelines 

placed undue weight on his single prior felony offense. 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 15, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 14-50365 Document: 00512869314 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/15/2014
No. 14-50365

We review Ferrufino’s challenge to the substantive reasonableness of his 

sentence for abuse of discretion, see Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 49-51 

(2007), and apply a rebuttable presumption of reasonableness to the withinguidelines sentence, see United States v. Mondragon-Santiago, 564 F.3d 357, 

360 (5th Cir. 2009). For purposes of preserving the issue for possible further 

review, Ferrufino argues that the presumption of reasonableness should not 

apply because the illegal reentry Guideline lacks an empirical basis. As 

Ferrufino concedes, his argument is foreclosed. See United States v. Duarte, 

569 F.3d 528, 529-31 (5th Cir. 2009); Mondragon-Santiago, 564 F.3d at 366-

67.

We have rejected the argument that double and triple counting 

necessarily renders a sentence unreasonable. See Duarte, 569 F.3d at 529-31;

United States v. Palma-Palma, 551 F. App’x 220, 221 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 

134 S. Ct. 2154 (2014). Moreover, Ferrufino has not shown that his sentence 

does not account for a factor that should receive significant weight, gives 

significant weight to an irrelevant or improper factor, or represents a clear 

error of judgment in balancing sentencing factors. See United States v. Cooks, 

589 F.3d 173, 186 (5th Cir. 2009). Mere disagreement with the propriety of his 

sentence or with the weight given to § 3553(a) factors does not suffice to rebut 

the presumption of reasonableness that attaches to a within-guidelines 

sentence. See United States v. Ruiz, 621 F.3d 390, 398 (5th Cir. 2010). The 

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

2

 Case: 14-50365 Document: 00512869314 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/15/2014
### §4705. Community partnerships

#### (a) Application

An application for assistance may be filed jointly by a community development financial institution and a community partner to carry out a community partnership.

#### (b) Application requirements

The Fund shall require a community partnership application—

(1) to meet the minimum requirements established for community development financial institutions under section 4704(b) of this title, except that the criteria specified in paragraphs (1) and (2)(A) of section 4704(b) of this title shall not apply to the community partner;

(2) to describe how each coapplicant will participate in carrying out the community partnership and how the partnership will enhance activities serving the investment area or targeted population; and

(3) to demonstrate that the community partnership activities are consistent with the strategic plan submitted by the community development financial institution coapplicant.

#### (c) Selection criteria

The Fund shall consider a community partnership application based on—

(1) the community development financial institution coapplicant—

(A) meeting the minimum selection criteria described in section 4704 of this title; and

(B) satisfying the selection criteria of section 4706 of this title;

(2) the extent to which the community partner coapplicant will participate in carrying out the partnership;

(3) the extent to which the community partnership will enhance the likelihood of success of the community development financial institution coapplicant's strategic plan; and

(4) the extent to which service to the investment area or targeted population will be better performed by a partnership as opposed to the individual community development financial institution coapplicant.

#### (d) Limitation on distribution of assistance

Assistance provided upon approval of an application under this section shall be distributed only to the community development financial institution coapplicant, and shall not be used to fund any activities carried out directly by the community partner or an affiliate or subsidiary thereof.

#### (e) Other requirements and limitations

All other requirements and limitations imposed by this subchapter on a community development financial institution assisted under this subchapter shall apply (in the manner that the Fund determines to be appropriate) to assistance provided to carry out community partnerships. The Fund may establish additional guidelines and restrictions on the use of Federal funds to carry out community partnerships.

(Pub. L. 103–325, title I, §106, Sept. 23, 1994, 108 Stat. 2171.)
### §765. Customer instructions

(a) The notice required by section 342 of this title to customers shall instruct each customer—

(1) to file a proof of such customer's claim promptly, and to specify in such claim any specifically identifiable security, property, or commodity contract; and

(2) to instruct the trustee of such customer's desired disposition, including transfer under section 766 of this title or liquidation, of any commodity contract specifically identified to such customer.

(b) The trustee shall comply, to the extent practicable, with any instruction received from a customer regarding such customer's desired disposition of any commodity contract specifically identified to such customer. If the trustee has transferred, under section 766 of this title, such a commodity contract, the trustee shall transmit any such instruction to the commodity broker to whom such commodity contract was so transferred.

(Pub. L. 95–598, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2619; Pub. L. 97–222, §18, July 27, 1982, 96 Stat. 240; Pub. L. 98–353, title III, §488, July 10, 1984, 98 Stat. 383.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

For Historical and Revision Notes for this section, see Historical and Revision Notes set out under section 766 of this title.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1984—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 98–353 substituted "notice required by" for "notice under".

1982—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 97–222 substituted "commodity contract" for "commitment".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1984 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 98–353 effective with respect to cases filed 90 days after July 10, 1984, see section 552(a) of Pub. L. 98–353, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.
February 7 , 2013



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

FAR EAST ENTERPRISES , INC. , Appellant

NO. 14

- 11

- 00743

- CV V.

NUMBER ONE SOUTHERN FOOD MART INC. D/B/A PHO NUI BISTRO

AND MYLINH THI HOANG , Appellees

____________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellees, NUMBER
ONE SOUTHERN FOOD MA RT INC. D/B/A PHO NU I BISTRO AND
MYLINH THI HOANG , signed June 17, 2011, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED

.
We order appellant, FAR EAST ENTERPRISES , INC. , to pay all costs incurred in this appeal. We further order this decision certified below for
observance.