13208 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 47 / Thursday, March 10, 2011 / Notices 

(1.) Document No. GC–10–281 

concerning Inv. No. 337–TA–722 

(Certain Automotive Vehicles and 

Designs Therefore). 

(2.) Document No. GC–11–011 

concerning Inv. No. 337–TA–568 

(Remand)(Certain Products and 

Pharmaceutical Compositions 

Containing Recombinant Human 

Erythropoetin). 

(3.) Document No. GC–11–013 

concerning Inv. No. 337–TA–587 

(Remand)(Certain Connecting Devices 

(‘‘Quick Clamps’’) for Use with Modular 

Compressed Air Conditioning Units, 

Including Filters, Regulators, and 

Lubricators (‘‘FRL’s’’) That are Part of 

Larger Pneumatic Systems and the FRL 

Units They Connect). 

(4.) Document No. GC–11–045 

concerning Inv. No. 1205–9 (Certain 

Festive Articles). 

In accordance with Commission 

policy, subject matter listed above, not 

disposed of at the scheduled meeting, 

may be carried over to the agenda of the 

following meeting. Earlier Notification 

of this meeting was not possible. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: March 7, 2011. 

William R. Bishop, 

Hearings and Meetings Coordinator. 

[FR Doc. 2011–5676 Filed 3–8–11; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Settlement 

Agreement Under the Clean Air Act, 

Comprehensive Environmental 

Response, Compensation, and Liability 

Act and the Resource Conservation 

and Recovery Act 

Notice is hereby given that on March 

4, 2011, a proposed Consent Decree and 

Settlement Agreement (the ‘‘Non-Owned 

Site Settlement Agreement’’) in the 

bankruptcy matter, Motors Liquidation 

Corp, et al., f/k/a General Motors Corp., 

et al., Jointly Administered Case No. 

09–50026 (REG), was lodged with the 

United States Bankruptcy Court for the 

Southern District of New York. The 

Parties to the Non-Owned Site 

Settlement Agreement are debtors 

Motors Liquidation Corporation, 

formerly known as General Motors 

Corporation, Remediation and Liability 

Management Company, Inc., and 

Environmental Corporate Remediation 

Company, Inc. (collectively, ‘‘Old GM’’) 

and the United States of America. The 

Settlement Agreement resolves claims 

and causes of action of the 

Environmental Protection Agency 

(‘‘EPA’’) against Old GM under the 

Comprehensive Environmental 

Response, Compensation, and Liability 

Act (‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 9601–9675, 

and the Resource Conservation and 

Recovery Act (‘‘RCRA’’), 42 U.S.C. 6901 

et seq. with respect to the following 

sites: 

1. The Casmalia Resources Superfund Site 

in California; 

2. The Operating Industries, Inc. Landfill 

Superfund Site in California; 

3. The Army Creek Landfill Superfund Site 

in Delaware; 

4. The Delaware Sand & Gravel Superfund 

Site in Delaware; 

5. The Lake Calumet Superfund Site in 

Illinois; 

6. The Waukegan Manufactured Gas & 

Coke Plant Superfund Site in Illinois; 

7. The Doepke Holliday Disposal 

Superfund Site in Kansas; 

8. The 68th Street Dump Superfund Site in 

Maryland; 

9. The Maryland Sand, Gravel, and Stone 

Superfund Site in Maryland; 

10. The Spectron Superfund Site in 

Maryland; 

11. The Dearborn Refining Site in 

Michigan; 

12. The Flint West a/k/a Chevy in The Hole 

Site in Michigan; 

13. The Forest Waste Disposal Superfund 

Site in Michigan; 

14. The H. Brown Company Superfund Site 

in Michigan; 

15. The Reclamation Oil Company Site in 

Michigan; 

16. The Rose Township Dump Superfund 

Site in Michigan; 

17. The Springfield Township Dump 

Superfund Site in Michigan; 

18. The Ventron/Velsicol Superfund Site in 

New Jersey; 

19. The Atlantic Resources Corporation 

Superfund Site in New Jersey; 

20. The Sealand Restoration Inc. 

Superfund Site in New York; 

21. The Tri-Cities Barrel Superfund Site in 

New York; 

22. The Massena Superfund Site in New 

York; 

23. The Mercury Refining Superfund Site 

located in New York; 

24. The Tremont City Barrel Fill Site in 

Ohio; 

25. The Cardington Road Superfund Site in 

Ohio; 

26. The Ford Road Landfill Superfund Site 

in Ohio; 

27. The Valleycrest Landfill Site in Ohio; 

28. The South Dayton Dump & Landfill 

Superfund Site in Ohio; 

29. The Chemical Recovery Systems Site in 

Ohio; 

30. The Lammers Barrel Superfund Site in 

Ohio; 

31. The Malvern TCE Superfund Site in 

Pennsylvania; 

32. The Tonolli Corporation Superfund 

Site in Pennsylvania; 

33. The Jacks Creek/Sitkin Smelting 

Corporation Superfund Site in Pennsylvania; 

and 

34. The Breslube-Penn Superfund Site in 

Pennsylvania. 

The Settlement Agreement also 

resolves civil penalty claims for failure 

to maintain adequate financial 

assurance for closure, post-closure and 

third party liability pursuant to RCRA 

Sections 3004(a) and (t), 42 U.S.C. 

6924(a) and (t) with respect to the 

following facilities: 

1. Cadillac/Luxury Car Engineering and 

Manufacturing, (Formerly Fiero), Pontiac, 

Michigan. 

2. Cadillac/Luxury Car Engineering and 

Manufacturing, Flint, Michigan; 

3. GM Former Allison Gas Turbine (AGT) 

Division, Indianapolis, Indiana; 

4. GM Locomotive Group, LaGrange, 

Illinois; 

5. GM Powertrain Group, Defiance, Ohio; 

6. GM Truck Group, Shreveport, Louisiana; 

7. GMC GM Technical Center, Warren, 

Michigan; 

8. Lansing Automotive Division, 

Lordstown, Ohio; 

9. Powertrain Group Saginaw Metal 

Castings, Saginaw, Michigan; 

10. Worldwide Facilities Group—MFD, 

Lordstown, Ohio; 

11. Worldwide Facilities Group, Anderson, 

Indiana; 

12. Worldwide Facilities Group, Coldwater 

Road, Flint, Michigan; 

13. Worldwide Facilities Group, Elyria, 

Ohio; and 

14. Worldwide Facilities Group, Moraine, 

Ohio. 

The Settlement Agreement also 

resolves civil penalty claims resulting 

from RCRA inspections at the following 

automotive assembly plants: 

1. The Pontiac East Assembly Plant, also 

known as the ‘‘Pontiac Assembly Center,’’ 

2100 South Opdyke Road, Pontiac, Michigan; 

2. The Orion Assembly Plant, 4555 

Giddings Road, Lake Orion, Michigan; 

3. The Moraine Assembly Plant, 2601 West 

Stroop Road, Moraine, Ohio; 

4. The Wilmington Assembly Plant, 801 

Boxwood, Wilmington, Delaware; 

5. The Doraville Facility, 3900 Motors 

Industrial Way, Doraville, Georgia; 

6. The Fairfax Assembly Plant, 3201 

Fairfax Trafficway, Kansas City, Kansas; 

7. The Wentzville Assembly Plant, 1500 

East Route ‘‘A,’’ Wentzville, Missouri; and 

8. The GM Lansing Car Assembly Plant, 

401 N. Verlinden Avenue, Lansing, 

Michigan. 

Finally, the Settlement Agreement 

resolves civil penalty claims under the 

Clean Air Act (‘‘CAA’’) 42 U.S.C. 7401– 

7671q with respect to manufacturing 

new automotive engines and selling or 

introducing them into commerce.Under 

the Non-Owned Site Settlement 

Agreement, EPA will receive an allowed 

general unsecured claim of $36,290,270 

for environmental remediation at 

twenty-nine non-owned sites and civil 

penalties for CAA and RCRA violations 

at multi-regional sites. EPA will also 

receive a total cash amount of 

$4,613,322 from bonds, and work up to 


jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 47 / Thursday, March 10, 2011 / Notices 13209 

the amount of $10.5 million in 

accordance with bond requirements at 

six non-owned sites. 

The Department of Justice will 

receive, for a period of fifteen days from 

the date of this publication, comments 

relating to the Non-Owned Site 

Settlement Agreement. Comments 

should be addressed to the Assistant 

Attorney General, Environment and 

Natural Resources Division, and either 

emailed to pubcommentees.enrd@usdoj.gov or mailed to P.O. 

Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, 

Washington, DC 20044–7611, and 

should refer to In re Motors Liquidation 

Corp., et al., D.J. Ref. 90–11–3–09754. 

Commenters may request an 

opportunity for a public meeting in the 

affected area, in accordance with 

Section 7003(d) of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. 

6973(d). 

The Non-Owned Site Settlement 

Agreement may be examined at the 

Office of the United States Attorney, 86 

Chambers Street, 3rd Floor, New York, 

New York 10007, and at the U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, Ariel 

Rios Building, 1200 Pennsylvania 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460. 

During the public comment period, the 

Non-Owned Site Settlement Agreement 

may also be examined on the following 

Department of Justice Web site, http:// 

www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ 

Consent_Decrees.html. Copies of the 

Non-Owned Site Settlement Agreement 

may also be obtained by mail from the 

Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, 

U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, 

DC 20044–7611 or by faxing or 

e-mailing a request to Tonia Fleetwood 

(tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), fax no. 

(202) 514–0097, phone confirmation 

number (202) 514–1547. In requesting a 

copy from the Consent Decree Library, 

please enclose a check in the amount of 

$6.75 (25 cents per page reproduction 

cost) payable to the U.S. Treasury or, if 

by e-mail or fax, please forward a check 

in that amount to the Consent Decree 

Library at the stated address. 

Maureen Katz, 

Assistant Section Chief, Environmental 

Enforcement Section, Environment and 

Natural Resources Division. 

[FR Doc. 2011–5445 Filed 3–9–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

United States and State of Texas v. 

United Regional Health Care System; 

Proposed Final Judgment and 

Competitive Impact Statement 

Notice is hereby given pursuant to the 

Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 

15 U.S.C. § 16(b)–(h), that a proposed 

Final Judgment, Stipulation and 

Competitive Impact Statement have 

been filed with the United States 

District Court for the Northern District 

of Texas, Wichita Falls Division, in 

United States of America and State of 

Texas v. United Regional Health Care 

System, Civil Action No. 7:11–cv– 

00030–O. On February 25, 2011, the 

United States filed a Complaint alleging 

that United Regional Health Care 

System has entered, maintained, and 

enforced exclusionary contracts with 

commercial insurers that effectively 

prevent those insurers from contracting 

with United Regional’s competitors in 

violation of Section 2 of the Sherman 

Act, 15 U.S.C. 2. The proposed Final 

Judgment, filed at the same time as the 

Complaint, prohibits United Regional 

from using agreements with commercial 

health insurers that improperly inhibit 

insurers from contracting with United 

Regional’s competitors. 

Copies of the Complaint, proposed 

Final Judgment, and Competitive Impact 

Statement are available for inspection at 

the Department of Justice, Antitrust 

Division, Antitrust Documents Group, 

450 Fifth Street, NW., Suite 1010, 

Washington, DC 20530 (telephone: 202– 

514–2481), on the Department of 

Justice’s Web site at http:// 

www.usdoj.gov/atr, and at the Office of 

the Clerk of the United States District 

Court for the Northern District of Texas, 

Wichita Falls Division. Copies of these 

materials may be obtained from the 

Antitrust Division upon request and 

payment of the copying fee set by 

Department of Justice regulations. 

Public comment is invited within 60 

days of the date of this notice. Such 

comments, and responses thereto, will 

be published in the Federal Register 

and filed with the Court. Comments 

should be directed to Joshua H. Soven, 

Chief, Litigation I Section, Antitrust 

Division, U.S. Department of Justice, 

450 Fifth Street, NW., Suite 4100, 

Washington, DC 20530 (telephone: 202– 

307–0827). 

Patricia A. Brink, 

Director of Civil Enforcement. 

In the United States District Court for 

the Northern District of Texas, Wichita 

Falls Division 

United States of America and State of 

Texas, Plaintiffs, v. United Regional 

Health Care System, Defendant. 

Case No.: 7:11–cv–00030. 

Judge: Reed C. O’Connor. 

Filed: Feb. 25, 2011. 

Description: Antitrust. 

Complaint 

The United States of America, acting 

under the direction of the Attorney 

General of the United States, and the 

State of Texas, by and through the Texas 

Attorney General, bring this civil 

antitrust action to enjoin defendant 

United Regional Health Care System 

(‘‘United Regional’’) from entering into, 

maintaining, or enforcing contracts with 

commercial health insurers that 

effectively prevent those insurers from 

contracting with United Regional’s 

competitors, in violation of Section 2 of 

the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. 2, and to 

remedy the effects of its unlawful 

conduct. Plaintiffs allege as follows: 

I. Nature of the Action 

1. United Regional has monopoly 

power in two relevant product markets 

in Wichita Falls, Texas and the 

surrounding area: (1) The sale of general 

acute-care inpatient hospital services 

(‘‘inpatient hospital services’’) to 

commercial health insurers, and (2) the 

sale of outpatient surgical services to 

commercial health insurers. United 

Regional has an approximately 90% 

share of the market for inpatient 

hospital services sold to commercial 

insurers and a greater than 65% share of 

the market for outpatient surgical 

services sold to commercial insurers. 

All health insurance companies in the 

relevant geographic market consider 

United Regional a ‘‘must-have’’ hospital 

for health plans because it is by far the 

largest hospital in the region and the 

only local provider of certain essential 

services. 

2. United Regional has maintained its 

monopoly power in the relevant markets 

by entering into contracts with 

commercial health insurers that exclude 

United Regional’s competitors in the 

Wichita Falls area from the insurers’ 

health-care provider networks 

(‘‘exclusionary contracts’’). These 

exclusionary contracts effectively 

prevent insurers from contracting with 

hospitals and other health-care facilities 


jdjones on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES