alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS RESTATED SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
JUNE 30, 1996 UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,929,127
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  223,218
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    181,334
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,363,716
<PP&E>                                         297,667
<DEPRECIATION>                                  71,452
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,733,992
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          337,473
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      8,911
<COMMON>                                         3,277
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,384,331
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,733,992
<SALES>                                        239,702
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               264,702
<CGS>                                          307,331
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  307,331
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,689,919
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,652,234)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,652,234)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,652,234)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.52)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.52)<F1>
<FN>
<F1>RESTATED TO REFLECT THE ADOPTION OF STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
NO. 128 AND SEC STAFF ACCOUNTING BULLETIN NO. 98.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# Re-Building a Wastewater Treatment Facility in Rural Montana

Copied to clipboard

04.13.2023

Located on the Fort Peck Indian Reservation, the City of Poplar is a thriving rural community of 759. It serves as Tribal headquarters of the Fort Peck Tribes and sits along Montana’s famed Hi-Line – the state’s northernmost route running from the North Dakota border in the east to the Rocky Mountain Front in the west.

About a decade ago it became clear that Poplar’s wastewater treatment facility, built in the 1930s, needed repairs and modernization. In 2016, community leaders rolled up their sleeves and got to work. They connected with Montana Rural Development Water and Environmental Program (WEP) specialists to plan, design, and construct a new wastewater treatment facility. This undertaking was designed to help city planners ensure its new wastewater treatment process would be efficient, sanitary, and safe.  

“As the plant aged and equipment failed, it created a snowball effect, shedding light on more issues,” said Engineering Project Manager Ryan Kopp. “USDA stepped up to help fund these additional items.” 

From 2016 to 2020, Poplar received more than $6.39 million in funding through a series of USDA Water and Waste Disposal Loans and Grants to build a modern facility that would meet the community’s needs. Construction began in 2019, resulting in modernizations to the headworks building, siphon system, and oxidation ditches. Additionally, ultraviolet disinfection – a crucial, final step in the wastewater treatment process – was rebuilt to modern, easily repairable standards.  

When construction was completed in 2020, the impacts were immediate and evident. The new wastewater treatment facility ensured that Poplar’s public works employees were no longer are at risk of wading through untreated wastewater because of a siphon backup, Poplar’s residents were no longer exposed to the odor of raw sewage, and wastewater discharged into the nearby Missouri River was 99% free of solid waste and contaminants.     

“When we started this project, the goal was to produce safe discharge into the river,” said Shane Halvorsen, director of public works for the City of Poplar. “We take a lot of pride in that.”

USDA Rural Development’s Water and Waste Disposal Loan Program provides households, businesses, and municipalities in eligible rural areas with clean and reliable drinking water, solid waste and wastewater treatment and disposal, and storm water drainage systems and support.

Watch the Rebuilding a Wastewater Treatment Facility in Poplar, Montana video to see this story in action.

Obligation Amount: 

Year(s) of Obligation: 
2020

Congressional District: 

## Related Story

Browse All Stories →

### City of La Feria Celebrates Library Grant Re-Opening

[Read More]

08.06.2019

Community FacilitiesEconomic Development
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1250,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with thequarterly report of Power3 Medical Products, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven B. Rash, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

The Report fully compileswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:    May 15, 2006 | /s/ Steven B. Rash                    |   |
|--------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                                 | Steven B. Rash                        |
|                                 | Chairman and Chief  Executive Officer |
|                                 | Power3 Medical  Products, Inc.        |

 

1

----
#### Morris Novitz, Respondent, v. Joseph Levinson, Appellant.

Judgment of the Municipal Court affirmed by default, with costs.. Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor and Rich, JJ., concurred.
# C_2010301EN.01006602.xml

| 6.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/66 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/66

---

Action brought on 24 September 2010 — Praskevicius v Parliament

(Case F-81/10)

()

2010/C 301/108

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Vidas Praskevicius (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: P. Nelissen Grade and G. Leblanc, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the defendant’s decision not to include the applicant in the list of officials promoted to grade AD6 for 2009 and [rejection] of the claim for non-material damage.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Appointing Authority of 21 June 2010 rejecting the applicant’s claim; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Appointing Authority of 21 June 2010 rejecting the applicant’s claim;

| — | annul the decision of the Appointing Authority of 24 November 2009, notified on 2 December 2009, not to include the applicant in the list of officials promoted to grade AD6 for 2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Appointing Authority of 24 November 2009, notified on 2 December 2009, not to include the applicant in the list of officials promoted to grade AD6 for 2009;

| — | inform the Appointing Authority of the effects of annulment of the contested decisions, in particular classification in grade AD6 and the retroactivity of promotion to grade AD6 from the date on which it should have become effective, that is to say, 1 January 2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

inform the Appointing Authority of the effects of annulment of the contested decisions, in particular classification in grade AD6 and the retroactivity of promotion to grade AD6 from the date on which it should have become effective, that is to say, 1 January 2009;

| — | grant the applicant EUR 500 in respect of compensation for non-material damage; |
| --- | --- |

—

grant the applicant EUR 500 in respect of compensation for non-material damage;

| — | order the European Parliament to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Parliament to pay the costs.

---
# C_2010179EN.01005101.xml

| 3.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/51

---

Action brought on 30 April 2010 — Stichting Woonpunt and Others v Commission

(Case T-203/10)

(2010/C 179/87)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Applicants: Stichting Woonpunt (Beek, Netherlands), Stichting Com.wonen (Rotterdam, Netherlands), Woningstichting Haag Wonen (The Hague, Netherlands), Stichting Woonbedrijf SWS.Hhvl (Eindhoven, Netherlands) (represented by: E. Henny, T. Ottervanger and P. Glazener, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the Commission’s decision concerning existing aid, in accordance with Article 263 TFEU; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the Commission’s decision concerning existing aid, in accordance with Article 263 TFEU;

| — | annul the Commission’s decision concerning new aid, in accordance with Article 263 TFEU; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Commission’s decision concerning new aid, in accordance with Article 263 TFEU;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicants seek annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 9963 final of 15 December 2009 relating to State aid E 2/2005 and N 642/2009 (Netherlands) — Existing and special project aid to housing corporations.

The applicants put forward eight pleas in law in support of the first head of claim. Those pleas are the same as the pleas which the applicants put forward in Case T-202/10 Stichting Woonlinie and Others v Commission.

The applicants put forward three further pleas in support of their second head of claim.

First, according to the applicants, the Commission infringed Articles 107 TFEU and 108 TFEU and Regulation No 659/1999 (1) by deeming project aid for declining urban areas to be part of an existing aid scheme, and by imposing mandatory requirements without following the procedure laid down under Regulation No 659/1999.

Second, the applicants submit that the Commission erroneously took the view that the fourth criterion referred to in Altmark (2) had not been satisfied inasmuch as housing corporations are not chosen by means of a public procurement procedure. According to the applicants, the Commission should have confined itself to checking that the measure did not lead to inefficiency.

Third, the applicants claim that the Commission should have considered whether there was any overcompensation for the service of general economic interest.

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty (OJ 1999 L 83, p. 1).

(2)  Case C-280/00 Altmark Trans and Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg [2003] ECR I 7747.

---
Certificate of Amendment to Amended and restated 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan



 Exhibit 10.6(b) 
 RACKSPACE HOSTING, INC. 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AMENDED AND RESTATED 
 2007 LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN 
 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors and stockholders of Rackspace Hosting, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), have approved an amendment to the Company’s Amended and Restated 2007 Long Term
Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) in order to increase the number of shares of Common Stock reserved thereunder from 4,600,000 to 10,000,000. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 
 1. The first paragraph of
Section 3 of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to be and read as follows: 
 A. “Subject to the provisions of
Section 20 of the Plan, the maximum aggregate number of Shares that may be awarded and sold under the Plan is 10,000,000 Shares, plus any Shares that, as of the Effective Date, have been reserved but not issued pursuant to any awards granted
under the Company’s 2005 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan, 2003 Stock Option Plan, or 1999 Assumed Stock Option Plan or the Webmail.us, Inc. 2004 Stock Incentive Plan as Amended in 2006 (collectively, the “Prior Plans”)
and are not subject to any awards granted thereunder (the “Aggregate Limit”), subject to adjustment under Section 3(b). The Shares may be authorized, but unissued, or reacquired Common Stock.” 
 2. Except as modified by this Amendment, all the terms and provisions of the Plan shall continue in full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned officer hereby certifies that the foregoing amendment to the Plan has been duly adopted and approved by the
Company’s Board of Directors and stockholders. 
  

					
	Dated: June 6, 2008	 	RACKSPACE HOSTING, INC.
			
		 	By:	 	 /s/ Alan Schoenbaum

		 		 	Senior VP, General Counsel, Secretary
### §2307. Designation of representatives by warrantor to perform duties under written or implied warranty

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to prevent any warrantor from designating representatives to perform duties under the written or implied warranty: Provided, That such warrantor shall make reasonable arrangements for compensation of such designated representatives, but no such designation shall relieve the warrantor of his direct responsibilities to the consumer or make the representative a cowarrantor.

(Pub. L. 93–637, title I, §107, Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2189.)
### **CHAPTER 74—COMPETITIVENESS POLICY COUNCIL**

Sec.
4801.
Findings and purpose.
4802.
Council established.
4803.
Duties of Council.
4804.
Membership.
4805.
Executive Director and staff.
4806.
Powers of Council.
4807.
Annual report.
4808.
Authorization of appropriations.
4809.
Definitions.
# C_2013359EN.01000701.xml

| 7.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 359/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 359/7

---

Judgment of the General Court of 25 October 2013 — Merlin and Others v OHIM — Dusyma (Game)

(Case T-231/10) (1)

1

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing a game - Earlier design - Grounds for invalidity - Novelty - Individual character - Distinction between goods and design - Articles 3, 4, 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)

2013/C 359/10

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Merlin Handelsgesellschaft mbH (Forchtenberg, Germany); Rolf Krämer (Forchtenberg); BLS Basteln Lernen Spielen GmbH (Forchtenberg); and Andreas Hohl (Künzelsau, Germany) (represented by: R. Kramer, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Dusyma Kindergartenbedarf GmbH (Schorndorf, Germany) (represented by: A. Zinnecker, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 March 2010 (Case R 879/2009-3) relating to invalidity proceedings between Merlin Handelsgesellschaft mbH and Others and Dusyma Kindergartenbedarf GmbH.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Merlin Handelsgesellschaft mbH, Mr Rolf Krämer, BLS Basteln Lernen Spielen GmbH and Mr Andreas Hohl to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Merlin Handelsgesellschaft mbH, Mr Rolf Krämer, BLS Basteln Lernen Spielen GmbH and Mr Andreas Hohl to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 209, 31.7.2010.

1

---
# C_2011055EN.01002302.xml

| 19.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/23

---

Order of the General Court of 16 December 2010 — Meister v OHIM

(Case T-48/10 P) (1)

1

(Appeals - Civil service - Officials - Promotion - 2008 promotion procedure - Decision awarding points in the promotion procedure - Mention of points accumulated in previous promotion procedures - Distortion of the facts - Burden of costs - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)

2011/C 55/42

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Herbert Meister (Muchamiel, Spain) (represented by: H.-J. Zimmermann, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: I. de Medrano Caballero and G. Faedo, acting as Agents, and D. Waelbroeck and E. Winter, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the order of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 30 November 2009 in Case F-17/09 Meister v OHIM ECR-SC I-A-1-0000 and I-A-2-0000, seeking for that order to be set aside.

Meister

OHIM

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Mr Herbert Meister is ordered to bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) in the appeal proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Herbert Meister is ordered to bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) in the appeal proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 100, 17.4.2010.

1

---
### §2213. Annual conference

The Administrator is authorized to organize, or to participate in organizing, an annual conference on fire prevention and control. He may pay, in whole or in part, the cost of such conference and the expenses of some or all of the participants. All of the Nation's fire services shall be eligible to send representatives to each such conference to discuss, exchange ideas on, and participate in educational programs on new techniques in fire prevention and control. Such conferences shall be open to the public.

(Pub. L. 93–498, §14, Oct. 29, 1974, 88 Stat. 1544.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of all functions, personnel, assets, components, authorities, grant programs, and liabilities of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, including the functions of the Under Secretary for Federal Emergency Management relating thereto, to the Federal Emergency Management Agency, see section 315(a)(1) of Title 6, Domestic Security.

For transfer of functions, personnel, assets, and liabilities of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, including the functions of the Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency relating thereto, to the Secretary of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see former section 313(1) and sections 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Functions of National Fire Prevention and Control Administration [now United States Fire Administration] and National Academy for Fire Prevention and Control generally transferred to Federal Emergency Management Agency. For further details see Transfer of Functions note set out under section 2202 of this title.
#### Germania Life Insurance Company v. Marie A. Donnegan.

Motion granted, with ten dollars costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>      5


<S>                                          <C>                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       3-MOS                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             MAY-31-2000           MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                SEP-01-1999           JUN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  NOV-30-1999           NOV-30-1999
<CASH>                                                  0                     0
<SECURITIES>                                            0                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  13,295,354            13,295,354
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0                     0
<INVENTORY>                                     3,830,065             3,830,065
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               17,229,200            17,229,200
<PP&E>                                            428,579               428,579
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 18,175,807            18,175,807
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           6,746,525             6,746,525
<BONDS>                                                 0                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0                     0
<PREFERRED>                                             0                     0
<COMMON>                                        7,342,163             7,342,163
<OTHER-SE>                                      3,138,273             3,138,273
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   18,175,807            18,175,807
<SALES>                                        18,624,623            29,038,121
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               18,624,623            29,038,121
<CGS>                                          15,614,389            15,614,389
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  17,051,937            26,728,087
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      0                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 1,572,686             2,310,034
<INCOME-TAX>                                      753,868             1,048,317
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               818,818             1,261,717
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0                     0
<CHANGES>                                               0                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                      818,818               818,818
<EPS-BASIC>                                           .15                   .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         .15                   .23



</TABLE>