alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 20023

I, Charles J. Zwebner, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to my knowledge, the Annual Report of Spot Mobile International Ltd. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Spot Mobile International Ltd.



|                        |  |     |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: February 15, 2011 |  | By: |  | /s/ Charles J. Zwebner 
|                        |  |     |  | Charles J. Zwebner     
|                        |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
§ 73.8 Cattle infected or exposed during transit. ( a ) *Healthy cattle from unquarantined State exposed en route.* Should healthy cattle in transit from a State not quarantined by the Secretary of Agriculture for scabies in cattle be unloaded en route and placed in infectious premises, they shall be treated as exposed cattle, and their further movement shall be subject to the provisions of this part with respect to the movement of exposed cattle.
( b ) *Interstate shipments of cattle under APHIS or State certificate found affected or exposed en route.* Cattle shipped interstate under a certificate from an APHIS inspector or State inspector or other cattle which are found en route to be affected with scabies or to have been exposed thereto, shall thereafter be handled in the same manner as diseased or exposed cattle are required by this part to be handled, and the means of conveyance and the chutes, alleys, and pens which have been occupied by diseased animals shall be cleaned and disinfected as provided in §§ 71.4 through 71.11 of this subchapter.
[28 FR 5945, June 13, 1963, as amended at 41 FR 5384, Feb. 6, 1976; 56 FR 52463, Oct. 21, 1991]
### §1519a. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–449, §7(b), Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2443

Section, Pub. L. 96–371, §2, Oct. 3, 1980, 94 Stat. 1362; Pub. L. 97–31, §12(8), Aug. 6, 1981, 95 Stat. 154, required an annual report to Congress by the Secretary of Transportation respecting conditions of the public ports of the United States. See section 308(c) of Title 49, Transportation.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification of PrincipalFinancial Officer**

**Requiredby Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b)**

**of theExchange Act**

** **

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Advanstar Communications Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, David W. Montgomery, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| By:    | /s/ David W.  Montgomery   |   |   |
|--------|----------------------------|--------|--------|
|   | David W. Montgomery        |   |
|   | Chief Financial Officer    |   |
|   |                       |   |
|   | Date: August 15, 2005 |   |

 

----
Order filed, September 17, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-12-00445-CV

____________

KERRY CARTER AND LETONIA JACKSON-CARTER, Appellant

V.

S.S. PROPERTIES LLP, SCOTT PIERCE AND SHIOW-MINN PIERCE, Appellee

On Appeal from the 333rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2009-24598

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due August 3, 2012. See Tex. R. App. P. 

35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The 

record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed 

timely, we issue the following order.

We order Jodi Masera, the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal 

within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
Contacts. Withwhom outside the FAAhasthis proposal been discussed? Organization Person Contacted Date Response National Business Aircraft Association Eli CoW 

### II

# JNJO] 

# - Regional Airline Association Dave Lottercr 

## 11);'1/67 ~ Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 

# JI~<{/67 

# - ATA Craig Fabian 

# J)jH/u7 ~
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1398 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.1398

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

                                 An Act

 
 To clarify certain boundaries on maps relating to the Coastal Barrier 
                            Resources System.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM MAPS.
    (a) In General.--The 7 maps described in subsection (b) are 
replaced by 14 maps entitled ``Dare County, North Carolina, Coastal 
Barrier Resources System, Cape Hatteras Unit NC-03P'' or ``Dare County, 
North Carolina, Coastal Barrier Resources System, Cape Hatteras Unit 
NC-03P, Hatteras Island Unit L03'' and dated October 18, 1999.
    (b) Description of Maps.--The maps described in this subsection are 
the 7 maps that--
        (1) relate to the portions of Cape Hatteras Unit NC-03P and 
    Hatteras Island Unit L03 that are located in Dare County, North 
    Carolina; and
        (2) are included in a set of maps entitled ``Coastal Barrier 
    Resources System'', dated October 24, 1990, and referred to in 
    section 4(a) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 
    3503(a)).
    (c) Availability.--The Secretary of the Interior shall keep the 
maps referred to in subsection (a) on file and available for inspection 
in accordance with section 4(b) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act 
(16 U.S.C. 3503(b)).

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-12411, 333-93201, 333-72648, 333-85246, 333-108167 and 333-114304) and the Registration Statements on FormS-2 (File Nos. 333-36798, 333-46988, 333-77014, 333-106033 and 333-121915) of Cambridge Heart, Inc. of our report dated March 25, 2004 relating to the financial statements which appears in this Form 10-K. 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Boston, Massachusetts 

March 30, 2006
§ 381.208 Poultry products offered for entry and entered to be handled and transported as domestic; entry into official establishments; transportation. ( a ) All poultry products, after entry into the United States in compliance with this subpart, shall be deemed and treated and, except as provided in § 381.207, shall be handled and transported as domestic products, and shall be subject to the applicable provisions of this part and to the provisions of the Poultry Products Inspection Act and the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
( b ) Poultry products entered in accordance with this subpart may, subject to the provisions of the regulations, be taken into official establishments and be mixed with or added to poultry products that are inspected and passed or exempted from inspection in such establishments.
( c ) Imported poultry products which have been inspected, passed, and marked under this subpart may be transported in commerce, only upon compliance with the applicable regulations.
[37 FR 9706, May 16, 1972, as amended at 54 FR 41050, Oct. 5, 1989]
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 26, 2023

No. 04-22-00596-CR

EX PARTE Edwing Ricardo ALVARADO RODRIGUEZ

From the County Court, Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10500CR

Honorable Tully Shahan, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The State filed its brief on January 10, 2023. Appellant’s reply brief was due on January 

30, 2023. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(c). Before the due date, Appellant filed a motion for 

extension of time to file a reply brief until March 1, 2023.

Appellant’s motion is granted. See id. R. 38.6(d). Appellant’s reply brief must be filed 

in this court by March 1, 2023. Further requests for extension of time will be disfavored.

It is so ORDERED on January 26, 2023.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:__________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ, 

 CLERK OF COURT

FILE COPY
#### § 557.10 Samples; inspection of consignments; refusal of entry; marking.

The provisions in 9 CFR 327.10 governing the taking of samples, the inspection of consignments, the refusal of entry, and the controlled pre-stamping of shipments of meat and meat food products apply with respect to fish and fish products.
### §5402. Definition

In this title,1 the term "transferred employee" means, as the context requires, an employee transferred to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency or the Corporation under section 5432 of this title.

(Pub. L. 111–203, title III, §302, July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 1520.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This title, where footnoted in text, is title III of Pub. L. 111–203, July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 1520, known as the Enhancing Financial Institution Safety and Soundness Act of 2010, which enacted this subchapter and sections 4b and 16 of this title, amended sections 1, 11, 248, 461, 481, 482, 1438, 1462, 1462a, 1463, to 1464, 1466a, 1467, 1467a, 1468, 1468a, to 1468b, 1470, 1701c, 1701p–1, 1708, 1757, 1785, 1786, 1787, 1812, 1813, 1817, 1818, 1820, 1821, 1823, 1828, 1829, 1831e, 1831j, 1833b, 1833e, 1834, 1841, 1843, 1844, 1861, 1867, 1881, 1882, 1884, 1972, 2709, 2902, 2905, 3206 to 3208, 3332, 4515, and 4517 of this title, section 906 of Title 2, The Congress, sections 78c, 78l, 78o–5, and 78w of Title 15, Commerce and Trade, sections 212, 657, 981, 982, 1006, 1014, and 1032 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, sections 321 and 714 of Title 31, Money and Finance, section 41501 of Title 34, Crime Control and Law Enforcement, sections 4003 and 8105 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, and section 3502 of Title 44, Public Printing and Documents, repealed section 1441a of this title, enacted provisions set out as notes under sections 1, 16, 1438, 1787, 1812, 1817, and 1821 of this title and section 906 of Title 2, and amended provisions set out as notes under sections 1437, 1463, 1464, 1467a, 1707, 1812, and 1818 of this title. For complete classification of title III to the Code, see Short title note set out under section 5301 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 1 day after July 21, 2010, except as otherwise provided, see section 4 of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as a note under section 5301 of this title.

1 See References in Text note below.
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 

82-34 

November 10, 1982 

REFERENCE: 

 [*1] 4211 Withdrawal Liability

4211(b)(1) Withdrawal Liability - Computation 

OPINION: 

 This responds to your inquiry on the operation of the presumptive method of allocation under § 4211 of the

Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980. Section 4211(b)(1) provides that the amount of unfunded vested

benefits allocable to an employer that withdraws from a multiemployer pension plan is the sum of three items: 

(1) the employer's proportional share of the unamortized amount of the change in the plan's unfunded vested benefits

for each plan year ending after April 28, 1980; 

(2) the employer's proportional shares of the unamortized amount of the plan's unfunded vested benefits as of the

end of the plan year ending before April 29, 1980; and 

(3) the employer's proportional shares of the unamortized amounts of any reallocated unfunded vested benefits. 

Where a plan has always had assets in excess of liabilities, the amounts under items (2) and (3) would be zero. It

the relationship between plan assets and liabilities had fluctuated, however, while always remaining in excess of

liabilities, an argument could be mand that the amount calculated under item (1) would be greater than zero. We think

[*2] this argument is without merit. It would treat annual changes in the plan's "fundedness" regardless of whether the

plan was fully funded for vested benefits, as equivalent to changes in unfunded vested benefits and would give no

meaning in this context, to the term "unfunded." In addition, fluctuations in assets, albeit always in excess of liabilities,

would alone account for withdrawal liability in situations where the plan had always been, and continued to be fully

funded. We see no reason in either the policies underlying the act, or the statutory language, for such an anomalous

result: 

In our view, it is far more consistent with the statutory language and purposes to construe annual changes where the

value of plan assets never falls below liabilities as zero. So, for example, a plan which has always been fully funded

which goes from $1 million overfunded to $1/2 million overfunded, would record a zero change in the value of unfunded

vested benefits for that year. 

We hope this information has been helpful to you. 

Henry Rose 

General Counsel
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO   18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Advanstar Communications Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three months ended
June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert L. Krakoff, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge,:



|/s/ROBERT L. KRAKOFFRobert L. Krakoff
Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2002
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
### §3912. Assignment and performance of duties

No member of the Auxiliary, solely by reason of such membership, shall be vested with, or exercise, any right, privilege, power, or duty vested in or imposed upon the personnel of the Coast Guard or the Reserve, except that any such member may, under applicable regulations, be assigned duties, which, after appropriate training and examination, he has been found competent to perform, to effectuate the purposes of the Auxiliary. No member of the Auxiliary shall be placed in charge of a motorboat, yacht, aircraft, or radio station assigned to Coast Guard duty unless he has been specifically designated by authority of the Commandant to perform such duty. Members of the Auxiliary, when assigned to duties as herein authorized shall, unless otherwise limited by the Commandant, be vested with the same power and authority, in the execution of such duties, as members of the regular Coast Guard assigned to similar duty. When any member of the Auxiliary is assigned to such duty he may, pursuant to regulations issued by the Secretary, be paid actual necessary traveling expenses, including a per diem allowance in conformity with standardized Government travel regulations in lieu of subsistence, while traveling and while on duty away from his home. No per diem shall be paid for any period during which quarters and subsistence in kind are furnished by the Government, and no per diem shall be paid for any period while such member is performing duty on a vessel.

(Aug. 4, 1949, ch. 393, 63 Stat. 556, §831; Pub. L. 104–324, title IV, §404(b), Oct. 19, 1996, 110 Stat. 3924; renumbered §3912, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §119(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4236.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 14, U.S.C., 1946 ed., §268 (Feb. 19, 1941, ch. 8, title I, §9, 55 Stat. 10; July 11, 1941, ch. 290, §10(1), 55 Stat. 587; Sept. 30, 1944, ch. 453, §6, 58 Stat. 761).

Changes were made in phraseology. 81st Congress, House Report No. 557.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 831 of this title as this section.

1996—Pub. L. 104–324 struck out "specific" after "be assigned" and after "when assigned to".
§ 93.220 Inspection at port of entry. ( a ) All poultry offered for entry from Mexico, including such poultry intended for movement through the United States in bond for immediate return to Mexico, shall be inspected at the port of entry, and all such poultry found to be free from communicable disease and fever tick infestation and not to have been exposed thereto, shall be admitted into the United States subject to the other applicable provisions of this part. Poultry found to be affected with or to have been exposed to a communicable disease, or infested with fever ticks, shall be refused entry. Poultry refused entry, unless exported within a time fixed in each case by the Administrator, shall be disposed of as said Administrator may direct.
( b ) Poultry covered by paragraph (a) of this section shall be imported through ports designated in § 93.203.
[55 FR 31495, Aug. 2, 1990, as amended at 57 FR 12190, Apr. 9, 1992. Redesignated and amended at 62 FR 56012, 56016, Oct. 28, 1997]
**Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 December 2010 – DTL v OHIM – Gestión de Recursos y Soluciones Empresariales
(Solaria)**

**(Case T-188/10)**

Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for Community figurative mark Solaria – Earlier national figurative mark SOLARTIA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the services – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009

Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services
– Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 25-26, 45, 52)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 February 2010 (Case R 767/2009-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Gestión de Recursos y Soluciones Empresariales SL and DTL Corporación SL. |

**Information relating to the case**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Applicant for the Community trade mark: | DTL Corporación, SL |
| Community trade mark sought: | Figurative mark containing the word element Solaria for services in Classes 37, 41 and 42 – Application No 5153325 |
| Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: | Gestiόn de Recursos y Soluciones Empresariales, SL |
| Mark or sign cited in opposition: | Spanish figurative mark containing the word element SOLARTIA No 2689747 for services in Classes 37 and 42 |
| Decision of the Opposition Division: | Opposition partially upheld |
| Decision of the Board of Appeal: | Appeal dismissed |

**Operative part**

The Court:

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | | Dismisses the action; |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | | Orders DTL Corporación SL to pay the costs. |
# C_2011340EN.01001903.xml

| 19.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 340/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/19

---

Judgment of the General Court of 5 October 2011 — Cooperativa Vitivinícola Arousana v OHIM — Sotelo Ares (ROSALIA DE CASTRO)

(Case T-421/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark ROSALIA DE CASTRO - Earlier national word mark ROSALIA - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the goods - Assessment of the conceptual similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2011/C 340/39

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Cooperativa Vitivinícola Arousana, S. Coop. Galega (Meaño, Spain) (represented by: E. Sánchez-Quiñones González, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: María Constantina Sotelo Ares (Cambados, Spain) (represented by: C. Lema Devesa, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 July 2010 (Case R 1804/2008-4), relating to opposition proceedings between María Constantina Sotelo Ares and Cooperativa Vitivinícola Arousana, S. Coop. Galega.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The General Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Cooperativa Vitivinícola Arousana, S. Coop. Galega to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Cooperativa Vitivinícola Arousana, S. Coop. Galega to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 301, 6.11.2010.

1

---
§ 590.50 Egg temperature and labeling requirements. ( a ) All shell eggs packed into containers destined for the ultimate consumer must be stored and transported under refrigeration at an ambient temperature of no greater than 45 °F (7.2 °C) and must bear safe handling instructions in accordance with 21 CFR 101.17(h).
( b ) Any producer-packer with an annual egg production from a flock of 3,000 or fewer layers is exempt from the temperature and labeling requirements of this section. Such producer-packer is still required to comply with the labeling requirements in 21 CFR 101.17(h).
[85 FR 68674, Oct. 29, 2020]