alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 590.120 Financial interest of inspectors. ( a ) Inspection program personnel will not inspect any product in which he or she has a financial interest; or that is produced by a plant at which the employee, the employee's spouse, minor child, partner, organization in which the employee is serving as officer, director, trustee, partner, or employee; or that is produced by any other person with whom inspection program personnel are negotiating or have any arrangements concerning prospective employment.
( b ) All inspection program personnel are subject to statutory restrictions with respect to political activities; e.g., 5 U.S.C. 7324 and 1502.
( c ) Violation of the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section or the provisions of applicable statutes referenced in paragraph (b) of this section will constitute grounds for dismissal.
( d ) Inspection program personnel are subject to all applicable provisions of law and regulations and instructions of the Department and the Food Safety and Inspection Service concerning employee responsibilities and conduct. The setting forth of certain prohibitions in this part in no way limits the applicability of such general or other regulations or instructions.
[85 FR 68674, Oct. 29, 2020]
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION


     Each of the undersigned  hereby  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Quarterly  Report of Columbus  McKinnon  Corporation (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ending October 2, 2005, fully complies with the requirements
of  Section  13(a)  or  15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 and that
information contained in the such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents,
in all material  respects,  the financial  condition and result of operations of
the Company.

     A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has
been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and  furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Dated:  NOVEMBER 2, 2005
        ----------------



                                             /S/ TIMOTHY T. TEVENS
                                             ---------------------
                                             Timothy T. Tevens
                                             Chief Executive Officer



                                             /S/ KAREN L. HOWARD
                                             -------------------
                                             Karen L. Howard
                                             Interim Chief Financial Officer






                                       1
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1405 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1405

 To amend the Woodrow Wilson Memorial Bridge Authority Act of 1995 to 
 provide an authorization of contract authority for fiscal years 2004 
                 through 2007, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 20, 1999

  Mr. Warner (for himself, Mr. Robb, Mr. Sarbanes, and Ms. Mikulski) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
               Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Woodrow Wilson Memorial Bridge Authority Act of 1995 to 
 provide an authorization of contract authority for fiscal years 2004 
                 through 2007, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Woodrow Wilson Bridge Financing Act 
of 1999''.

SEC. 2. ADVANCE AUTHORIZATION OF CONTRACT AUTHORITY FOR THE WOODROW 
              WILSON BRIDGE.

    (a) Federal Contribution.--Section 412(a)(1) of the Woodrow Wilson 
Memorial Bridge Authority Act of 1995 (109 Stat. 627; 112 Stat. 159) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``2002, and'' and inserting ``2002,''; and
            (2) by inserting ``, and $150,000,000 for each of fiscal 
        years 2004 through 2007'' after ``2003''.
    (b) Limitation on Federal Contribution.--Section 412 of the Woodrow 
Wilson Memorial Bridge Authority Act of 1995 (109 Stat. 627; 112 Stat. 
159) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(d) Limitation on Federal Contribution.--The total amount made 
available from the Highway Trust Fund under this section shall not 
exceed $1,500,000,000. Amounts from the Highway Trust Fund for the 
Project in excess of $1,500,000,000 shall be provided by the Capital 
Region jurisdictions.
    ``(e) Contributions by Capital Region Jurisdictions.--
            ``(1) In general.--For each of fiscal years 2004 through 
        2007, every $1 provided from the Highway Trust Fund under this 
        section shall be matched by at least $0.67 provided by the 
        Capital Region jurisdictions from amounts made available to the 
        jurisdictions under title 23, United States Code, or from other 
        sources available to the jurisdictions.
            ``(2) Allocation.--The Capital Region jurisdictions shall 
        allocate payment of the matching funds required under paragraph 
        (1) as the jurisdictions determine to be appropriate.''.
                                 <all>
```
# Geothermal Technology Helps Couple Make Year-Round Cut Flower Farm a Reality

Copied to clipboard

10.05.2023

Taking their chance on a lifelong dream, former urban dwellers Rebecca and Mark Ginsberg traded their conventional city lifestyle for rural living, establishing a cut flower farm. For the New Jersey couple it felt like a moonshot, but they believed they could do it.

Initially, they used fossil fuels to heat the year-round greenhouse, but soon turned to the USDA Rural Development for a more environmentally friendly solution. 

Through a Rural Energy for America Program (REAP) grant in the amount of $24,193, they converted Moonshot Farm LLC from heating with propane pumps to using geothermal technology.The new system is much more efficient. One unit of electric energy used by the geothermal heat pump produces at least four units of heat- a realization of 400 percent efficiency! In addition, it will put money back in their pockets, saving over $5,000 of propane annually.

Surrounded by Dahlias, Lisianthus, and Mums and beaming with pride, Rebecca shared how thrilled she is to be growing flowers year-round from her renewably powered greenhouses.

“Our flowers are beautiful, locally-grown, and have a low carbon footprint, she says. For us, having the geothermal system has been an immediate bottom-line revenue boost.”

She says, “We are now able to grow our flowers in the dead of winter, and the marketing appeal of locally grown with renewable energy has been huge, with customers coming from all over the region.”

She recommends REAP for other farmers looking to install renewable energy technology, which could include geothermal, solar, biomass, wind, or other renewable systems, and can also include the installation of more energy-efficient equipment such as lighting or refrigeration.

“We are very eager to get other farmers using this technology. Not only is it way more environmentally friendly than propane and natural gas but with the USDA’s programs and the new tax credits it actually makes financial sense.”

USDA Rural Development New Jersey State Director Jane Asselta adds, “Moonshot Farms is a success story we tell often to encourage farmers to make the switch to greener, cleaner, more efficient energy systems for their greenhouses, hoop houses and tunnels. With our grant funds, we make money saving, energy efficiency projects even more affordable.”

The Rural Energy for America Program can help agricultural producers and rural small businesses with installing renewable energy systems or making energy efficiency improvements. Agricultural producers may also apply for new energy efficient equipment and new system loans for agricultural production and processing. For more information contact Maryanne Tancredi at maryann.tancredi@usda.gov or (856)-787-7752

Obligation Amount: 

Year(s) of Obligation: 
2022

Congressional District: 

## Related Story

Browse All Stories →

### Milk Trucks Run on Biofuel Generated from Dairy Operation's Waste

[Read More]

08.06.2019

BusinessRenewable Energy
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6883

WILLIAM RICHARD MARVIN, III,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge.

(CA-00-742-2)

Submitted: October 4, 2001 Decided: October 11, 2001

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Richard Marvin, III, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Bain Smith,

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

William Richard Marvin, III, seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28

U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny Marvin’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. See Marvin v. Angelone, No. CA-00-742-2 (E.D. Va. filed May

1, 2001; entered May 2, 2001). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-50547

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Armando Efrain-Samayoa Salazar, 

Defendant—Appellant,

consolidated with

_____________

No. 21-50550

_____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Armando Efrain Samayoa-Salazar, 

Defendant—Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 11, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-50547 Document: 00516162281 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/11/2022
No. 21-50547

c/w No. 21-50550

2

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 4:21-CR-271-1

USDC No. 4:21-CR-42-1

Before Wiener, Dennis, and Haynes, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

In a consolidated appeal, Armando Efrain Samayoa-Salazar1

challenges the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for 

illegal reentry and a separate judgment revoking the supervised release term 

imposed in an earlier case. Because his appellate brief does not address the 

validity of the revocation or the revocation sentence, Samayoa-Salazar has 

abandoned any challenge to the revocation judgment. See Yohey v. Collins, 

985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993).

Samayoa-Salazar argues for the first time on appeal that the 

enhancement of his illegal reentry sentence pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) 

was unconstitutional because the fact of his prior conviction was not charged 

in his indictment or proved to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. He concedes 

that this argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 

U.S. 224 (1998), but he wishes to preserve the issue for further review. The 

Government has filed an unopposed motion for summary affirmance or, in 

the alternative, a motion for an extension of time to file a brief. 

We conclude that Samayoa-Salazar’s concession of foreclosure is 

correct, and summary affirmance is appropriate. See United States v. Pervis, 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

1 The text of both of the district court judgments usesthis version of the DefendantAppellant’s name.

Case: 21-50547 Document: 00516162281 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/11/2022
No. 21-50547

c/w No. 21-50550

3

937 F.3d 546, 553-54 (5th Cir. 2019); Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 

F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969).

The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, 

the Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is 

DENIED AS MOOT, and the judgments of the district court are 

AFFIRMED.

Case: 21-50547 Document: 00516162281 Page: 3 Date Filed: 01/11/2022
§ 72.13 Permitted dips and procedures. ( a ) *Dipping requirements; facilities; handling.* The dipping of cattle for interstate movement shall be done only with a permitted dip and at places where proper equipment is provided for dipping and for handling the cattle in a manner to prevent exposure to infection after the final dipping. Cattle which are to be dipped shall be given an opportunity to drink sufficient water to quench their thirst prior to dipping, be carefully handled, and not dipped while they are in a heated or exhausted condition. Dipped cattle shall not be loaded for shipment until dry.[4]
( b ) *Permitted dips.* The dips at present permitted by the U.S. Department of Agriculture in official dipping for interstate movement are: ( 1 ) Approved proprietary brands of coumaphos (Co-Ral ®), 25 percent wettable powder or flowable form labeled for use as a 0.25 percent dip and used at a concentration of 0.125 to 0.250.4
( 2 ) [Reserved]
( c ) *Approval of dips.* Proprietary brands of dips are permitted to be used for purposes of this part only when approved by the Administrator, APHIS. Before a dip will be specifically approved as a permitted dip for the eradication of ticks, APHIS will require that the product be registered under the provisions of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (7 U.S.C. 135 *et seq.*); that its efficacy and stability have been demonstrated; that trials have been conducted to determine that its concentration can be maintained and that under actual field conditions the dipping of cattle with a solution of definite strength will effectually eradicate ticks without injury to the animals dipped.
( d ) *Tissue residues; restriction on slaughter.* Tissue residues are created following use of certain dips. Animals treated with such dips should not be slaughtered for food purposes until the expiration of such period as may be required under the Federal Meat Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 601 *et seq.*). The length of this period shall be specified on each certificate issued by the inspector who supervises the dipping.
[33 FR 18089, Dec. 5, 1968, as amended at 34 FR 12214, July 24, 1969; 36 FR 19157, Sept. 30, 1971; 36 FR 19972, Oct. 14, 1971; 37 FR 13529, July 11, 1972; 38 FR 19012, July 17, 1973; 40 FR 12768, Mar. 21, 1975; 42 FR 19854, Apr. 15, 1977; 47 FR 11002, Mar. 15, 1982; 49 FR 19799, May 10, 1984; 49 FR 32540, Aug. 15, 1984; 50 FR 430, 431, Jan. 4, 1985; 56 FR 51974, Oct. 17, 1991; 66 FR 21062, Apr. 27, 2001; 78 FR 8961, Feb. 7, 2013] Footnotes -
72.13
[4] Care is required when treating animals and in maintaining the required concentration of chemicals in dipping baths. Detailed information concerning the use of, criteria for, and names of proprietary brands of permitted dips—as well the use of compressed air, vat management techniques, and other information—is available from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Veterinary Services, National Animal Health Programs, 4700 River Road Unit 43, Riverdale, MD 20737-1231.
EXHIBIT 21.01
 
 Jurisdiction or State ofName of Subsidiary of Alliance Semiconductor Corporation
    
    
    IncorporationAlliance Semiconductor Holding Company, LLC
    
    
    DelawareAlliance Semiconductor International Corporation
    
    
    DelawareAlliance Semiconductor (India) Private Limited
    
    
    IndiaAlliance Semiconductor (S.A.) (Pty) Ltd.
    
    
    South AfricaAlliance Semiconductor, South Africa, LLC
    
    
    DelawareChip Engines, Inc.
    
    
    CaliforniaChip
Engines (India) Private Limited
    
    

IndiaDioptech, Inc.
    
    
    DelawareNimbus Technology, Inc.
    
    
    CaliforniaSiPackets, Inc.
    
    
    California
-  Home 
-  About 
-  Leadership 

# In This Section

                      -  Who We Are 
                      -  PHMSA Guidance 
                      -  Organization 
                      -  Leadership 
                      -  PHMSA FAQs 
                      -  Careers 
                      -  Working with PHMSA 

## Contact Us

Office of Pipeline Safety
U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration1200 New Jersey Avenue, SEWashington, DC20590United States

**Email:**phmsa.pipelinesafety@dot.gov**Phone:**202-366-4595****Fax:**202-366-4566****Business Hours:**9:00am-5:00pm ET, M-F

If you are deaf, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability, please dial 7-1-1 to access telecommunications relay services.

# Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety

## Alan K. Mayberry

Mr. Mayberry is the Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety within the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) in Washington, D.C. and serves as the senior federal career official for pipeline safety in the United States.

Mr. Mayberry joined PHMSA’s Office of Pipeline Safety (OPS) in 2006, in a senior engineering role within the Engineering and Emergency Support Division. He was appointed Director of the division in 2008 and was responsible for supporting OPS programs and the regional offices on nationwide pipeline issues to ensure uniform policies. Additionally, Mr. Mayberry led PHMSA’s response to major pipeline incidents. In 2010, he was appointed as the Deputy Associate Administrator (DAA) for Field Operations, overseeing OPS’ pipeline safety and enforcement oversight efforts throughout PHMSA’s five regional offices. Mr. Mayberry later assumed the role of DAA for Policy and Programs, where he led OPS’ development of comprehensive oversight programs including regulatory development, engineering and research, state grants, federal enforcement, and training and qualifications programs.

Having led all parts of OPS, Mr. Mayberry was appointed to his current position of Associate Administrator in 2016.

Mr. Mayberry has over 40 years of experience in the energy industry, both in the private sector and as federal regulator, and his expertise is equally divided between pipeline operations and design engineering.

Mr. Mayberry is a graduate of the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, with a Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, and is a registered Professional Engineer.
### §7420. Recruit basic training: privacy

The Secretary of the Army shall require that access by drill sergeants and other training personnel to a living area in which recruits are housed during basic training shall be limited after the end of the training day, other than in the case of an emergency or other exigent circumstance, to drill sergeants and other training personnel who are of the same sex as the recruits housed in that living area or to superiors in the chain of command of those recruits who, if not of the same sex as the recruits housed in that living area, are accompanied by a member (other than a recruit) who is of the same sex as the recruits housed in that living area.

(Added Pub. L. 105–261, div. A, title V, §522(a)(1), Oct. 17, 1998, 112 Stat. 2012, §4320; renumbered §7420, Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title VIII, §808(c)(1), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 1839.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 7420 was renumbered section 8720 of this title.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–232 renumbered section 4320 of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2018 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 115–232 effective Feb. 1, 2019, with provision for the coordination of amendments and special rule for certain redesignations, see section 800 of Pub. L. 115–232, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.

#### Implementation

Pub. L. 105–261, div. A, title V, §522(a)(3), Oct. 17, 1998, 112 Stat. 2012, provided that: "The Secretary of the Army shall implement section 4320 [now 7420] of title 10, United States Code, as added by paragraph (1), as rapidly as feasible and shall ensure that the provisions of that section are applied to all recruit basic training classes beginning not later than the first such class that enters basic training on or after April 15, 1999."
#### § 557.14 Marking of fish and fish products and labeling of immediate containers thereof for importation.

The regulations in 9 CFR 327.14 governing the marking of meat and meat food products and the labeling of immediate containers of those products for importation apply with respect to fish and fish products.
#### In the Matter of the Application of the Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York, Relative to Acquiring Title, etc., for the Purpose of Opening Anthony Avenue, from Clay Avenue to Burnside Avenue and from Burnside Avenue to the Concourse, etc., in the Twenty-fourth Ward of the City of New York. The City of New York, Appellant; Northern Union Gas Company and Others, Respondents.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on the opinion of the coúrt below (Reported in *Matter of Anthony Avenue,*46 Misc. Rep. 525). (Scott, J., not sitting.)