alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(67 South. 375)

No. 20926.

#### STATE ex rel. COMMERCIAL-GERMANIA TRUST & SAVINGS BANK v. BOARD OF LIQUIDATION OF STATE DEBT et al.

(Jan. 11, 1915.)

Appeal from Twenty-Second Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge; C. K. Schwing, Judge ad hoe.

Action by the State, on the relation of the Commercial-Germania Trust *&*Savings Bank, against the Board of Liquidation of the State Debt and others. From judgment for relator, defendants appeal.

Reversed, alternative writ of mandamus recalled, and injunction dissolved.

Harry P. Gamble, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Gustave Lemle, MeCloskey *&*Benedict, and Howe, Fenner, Spencer *&*Cocke, all of New Orleans, A. Provosty, of New Roads, Laycock & Beale, of Baton Rouge, Ott, Johnson & Ott, of Bogalusa, Bird *&*Bird, of Baton Rouge, and Hall, Monroe *&*Lemann, of New Orleans, of counsel), for appellant Board of Liquidation of State Debt. Browne, Williamson & Browne, of Shreveport, Thomas M. Burns, of Covington, Chas. A. Holcombe, and Taylor *&*Porter, ali of Baton Rouge, and Merrick, Gensler & Schwarz, of New' Orleans, for appellee.

SOMMERYILLE, J.

For the reasons given in the case entitled State of Louisiana ex rel. Louisiana Trust *&*Savings Bank v. Board of Liquidation of the State Debt et al., 67 South. 370, ante, p. 571, No. 20854 on the docket of this court, this day decided—

It is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment appealed from be reversed; that the alternative writ of mandamus issued herein be recalled; and that the injunction be dissolved — all at the cost of relator in both courts.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6598

LAWRENCE E. GRIFFIN,

Movant - Appellant,

versus

MICHELLE ELZIE, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.

(CA-01-3-3)

Submitted: July 26, 2001 Decided: August 2, 2001

Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lawrence E. Griffin, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Lawrence E. Griffin appeals the district court’s order denying

his petition for mandamus relief. We have reviewed the record and

the district court’s opinion accepting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we grant Griffin’s motion to amend his pleading and

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Griffin v.

Elzie, No. CA-01-3-3 (E.D. Va. Mar. 29, 2001). We deny Griffin’s

motion for appointment of counsel and his motion captioned “Appellate Revised Petition Remanding Motion to Dismiss.” We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
USDA 

iiiii 

CJ 

CJ 

CJ 

CJ 

1111 

1111 

2023 RMA Crops' Indemnities

Source: USDA Risk Management Agency - Summary of Business

Data Current Date: January 29, 2024

Layer Credits: USDA & US Census Bureau

 The information displayed in this map is intended to serve as an aid in displaying data provided or stored by the Risk Management Agency. It does not modify, replace or supersede any USDA published policy provisions or procedures.

Map Projection: USA Contiguous Albers Equal Area Conic

Map Creation Date: February 01, 2024

Maps created by USDA Risk Management Agency are for spatial and visual context for depicting the basic information for “where”. Maps are not considered a survey. General Reference Only.

RMA Risk Management Services Division

 -- Public Information --

This map depicts weekly crop insurance indemnity data by county as of the data current date denoted on the map

No Indemnity ($0.00)

$0.01 - $1,000,000.00

$1,000,000.01 - $10,000,000.00

$10,000,000.01 - $25,000,000.00

$25,000,000.01 - $50,000,000.00

$50,000,000.01 - $150,869,633.00

and is published biweekly.
# C_2014129EN.01001701.xml

| 28.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/17

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2014 — El Corte Inglés v OHIM — Technisynthese (BTS)

(Case T-592/10) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark BTS - Earlier Community and national figurative marks TBS - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2014/C 129/20)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: El Corte Inglés, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by M. López Camba and J. L. Rivas Zurdo initially, then J. L. Rivas Zurdo, E. Seijo Veiguela and I. Munilla Muñoz, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Technisynthese SARL (Saint-Pierre-Montlimart, France)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 September 2010 (Case R 1380/2009-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Technisynthese SARL and El Corte Inglés, SA.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders El Corte Inglés, SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders El Corte Inglés, SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 80, 12.3.2011.

---
#### August Wischover v. German Mutual Fire Ins. Co. of North Chicago.

*Juror—competency—opinion on construction of a resolution.*Where a juror was challenged as having formed an opinion as to the construction of a written resolution of the directors of an insurance company, which had been offered in evidence on the trial of a former case similar to the one on trial, and in which former case the person had served as a juror, and the court disallowed the challenge: *Held,*that, as the construction of the resolution was a question of law, the court did not err in holding the juror competent.

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. William A. Portee, Judge, presiding.

Mr. George W. Pa ekes, for the appellant.

Messrs. Barber & Lackner, for the appellee.

Per Curiam :

The questions arising upon this record are substantially the same as in the case of *Williams*v. *German Mutual Fire Insurance Company of North*Chicago, 68 Ill. 387, and this case is decided in the same wav.

There was a further point made in this case, upon the overruling of a challenge to a juror who had sat on the trial of a former case, brought upon a similar premium note, on the ground of having formed an opinion. The supposed opinion seemed to have been in regard to a written resolution of the company, offered in evidence on the former trial.

The construction of the resolution was a question of law for the court to pass upon, and we can not say that the court erred in admitting the juror as not having formed such an opinion as should disqualify him from sitting as a jurror in the case.

The judgment of the court below will be affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*
### §1692n. Relation to State laws

This subchapter does not annul, alter, or affect, or exempt any person subject to the provisions of this subchapter from complying with the laws of any State with respect to debt collection practices, except to the extent that those laws are inconsistent with any provision of this subchapter, and then only to the extent of the inconsistency. For purposes of this section, a State law is not inconsistent with this subchapter if the protection such law affords any consumer is greater than the protection provided by this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 90–321, title VIII, §816, as added Pub. L. 95–109, Sept. 20, 1977, 91 Stat. 883.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective upon the expiration of six months after Sept. 20, 1977, see section 819 of Pub. L. 90–321, as added by Pub. L. 95–109, set out as a note under section 1692 of this title.
# CA2006252EN.01000301.xml

| 18.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 252/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 252/3

---

RESERVE LISTS

   (1)

RESERVE LISTS

(1

OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/AST/5/05

OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/AST/5/05

ASSISTANTS (B*3)

ASSISTANTS (B*3)

IN THE BUILDINGS MANAGEMENT SECTOR

IN THE BUILDINGS MANAGEMENT SECTOR

(2006/C 252 A/01)

Merit Group 1

| BENINTENDI | Orazio |
| --- | --- |
| DE STERCK | Harald |
| DECROP | Florence |
| FAVRESSE | Marc |
| LANDES | Michel |
| MACAIONE | Giuseppe |
| MASSON | Christian |
| MIRANDA VIZUETE | Jose |
| MORELLO | Salvatore |
| PAMART | Jean-Pierre |
| PANAS | Evangelos |
| REPP | Burkhard |
| RUSCH | Moritz |
| VIGNERON | Alice |
| WEBENDOERFER | Annette |

BENINTENDI

Orazio

DE STERCK

Harald

DECROP

Florence

FAVRESSE

Marc

LANDES

Michel

MACAIONE

Giuseppe

MASSON

Christian

MIRANDA VIZUETE

Jose

MORELLO

Salvatore

PAMART

Jean-Pierre

PANAS

Evangelos

REPP

Burkhard

RUSCH

Moritz

VIGNERON

Alice

WEBENDOERFER

Annette

Merit Group 2

| BOEDEMANN | Gabriele |
| --- | --- |
| BOSMAN | Didier |
| CUPILLARD | Gilles |
| DE JONG MEINDERT | Johan |
| DE MEY | Ann |
| DE WAELE | Freddy |
| DU CHAMPS (NSWAL) | Laurent |
| HARMIGNIE | Bertrand |
| HOUDART | Darian |
| KLATT | Bettina |
| NARDIN | Thierry |
| PARMENTIER | Pierre |
| RAES | Luc |
| TASSIER | Laurent |
| THIEREN | Daniel |
| TONINI | Pilade |

BOEDEMANN

Gabriele

BOSMAN

Didier

CUPILLARD

Gilles

DE JONG MEINDERT

Johan

DE MEY

Ann

DE WAELE

Freddy

DU CHAMPS (NSWAL)

Laurent

HARMIGNIE

Bertrand

HOUDART

Darian

KLATT

Bettina

NARDIN

Thierry

PARMENTIER

Pierre

RAES

Luc

TASSIER

Laurent

THIEREN

Daniel

TONINI

Pilade

The reserve lists will be valid until 31 December 2007; they may be extended.

31 December 2007

---

(1)  A successful candidate may explicitly request that her/his name not be published.

1

---
8Z00°

62°00

NATIONAL OCEAN SERVICE.

e
&
ry : q
PR WARY
COMPILATION SOURCE ; _SyMBoLosy
cant De oeolt Sino aces UW
nefees OPE aa SUBJEET Po noc) ISIN
° BATHYMETRIC CONTOUR INTERVAL 2 METERS

— “ WITH SUPPLEMENTARY 1 METER CONTOURS
DATUM IS MEAN LOW WATER

(DAYTONA BEACH QW, FL.)
"82 Daytona SEAS

DAYTONA BEACH 6W, FLA.

J pero:

81°00"

ay 'yorrgqrevag hog:

ce

CCG “eor:/
#### § 95.24 Bone meal for use as fertilizer or as feed for domestic animals; requirements for entry.

Steamed or degelatinized or special steamed bone meal, which, in the normal process of manufacture, has been prepared by heating bone under a minimum of 20 pounds steam pressure for at least one hour at a temperature of not less than 250 °Fahrenheit (121 °Centigrade), may be imported without further restrictions for use as fertilizer or as feed for domestic animals if such products are free from pieces of bone, hide, flesh, and sinew and contain no more than traces of hair and wool. Bone meal for use as fertilizer or as feed for domestic animals which does not meet these requirements will not be eligible for entry.

[28 FR 5981, June 13, 1963. Redesignated at 78 FR 73003, Dec. 4, 2013]
#### § 354.75 Accessibility of products.

Each product for which inspection service is requested shall be so arranged so as to permit adequate determination of its class, quantity, and condition as the circumstances may warrant.
|  |  |
|--|--|

| PublicationsAnnual Reports 2003 Economic Impact & Diversity Annual Report, May 2004 2001-2002 Economic Impact & Diversity Annual Report, May 2003                                         
[Home] [Office of the Director] [DOE Community Service] [Mission Statement] [Accomplishments] [Organization Chart] [Staff Listing] [Publications] [News and Events] [Security & Privacy] [Webmaster] [Quick Links]
  |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
### §1901. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–272, §7(b), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1379

Section, Pub. L. 92–513, §2, Oct. 20, 1972, 86 Stat. 947; Pub. L. 94–163, title III, §301, Dec. 22, 1975, 89 Stat. 901; Pub. L. 96–425, §8(a)(2), Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1828; Pub. L. 98–547, title I, §101(b), Oct. 25, 1984, 98 Stat. 2767, defined terms for purposes of this chapter, except subchapter V of this chapter. See sections 32101, 32301, and 32502 of Title 49, Transportation.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 92–513, §1, Oct. 20, 1972, 86 Stat. 947, provided that Pub. L. 92–513 (enacting this chapter) could be cited as the "Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act", prior to repeal by Pub. L. 103–272, §7(b), July 5, 1994, 108 Stat. 1379.
UNITED
STATES


SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington,
D.C. 20549




FORM
8-K





CURRENT
REPORT


Pursuant
to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934




Date of
Report (Date of earliest event reported)October 26,
2008




Progenics
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.


(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)




Delaware
            
            000-23143
            
            13-3379479(State
      or other jurisdiction
              of
      incorporation)
            
            (Commission
              File
      Number)
            
            (IRS
      Employer
              Identification
      No.)777 Old Saw Mill River
      Road, Tarrytown, New York
            
            10591(Address
      of principal executive offices)
            
            (Zip
      Code)Registrant's telephone number,
      including area code(914)
      789-2800




Check the
appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously
satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following
provisions (seeGeneral
Instruction A.2. below):






oWritten communications
pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)




oSoliciting material
pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)




oPre-commencement
communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))




oPre-commencement
communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))











Item
8.01. Other Events.


On
October 26, 2008, Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Nasdaq: PGNX) announced
positive interim results from two separate phase 2 clinical trials of PRO 140,
an investigational drug that the Company is developing for treatment of human
immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.





A copy of
the press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and the information
contained therein is incorporated by reference into this Item 8.01 of this
Current Report on Form 8-K.




Item
9.01   Financial Statements and Exhibits.




(d)
Exhibits





Exhibit
No.     Description




99.1
            Press
      Release dated October 26, 2008.







SIGNATURES






Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto
duly authorized.






PROGENICS
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.


By:/s/ ROBERT A.
MCKINNEY


Robert A.
McKinney


Chief Financial Officer, Senior
Vice President,


Finance & Operations and
Treasurer








Date:  October 26,
2008
### §1070. Appeals to Trademark Trial and Appeal Board from decisions of examiners

An appeal may be taken to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board from any final decision of the examiner in charge of the registration of marks or a final decision by an examiner in an ex parte expungement proceeding or ex parte reexamination proceeding upon the payment of the prescribed fee. The Director may reconsider, and modify or set aside, a decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board under this section.

(July 5, 1946, ch. 540, title I, §20, 60 Stat. 435; Pub. L. 85–609, §1(b), Aug. 8, 1958, 72 Stat. 540; Pub. L. 116–260, div. Q, title II, §§225(d)(1), 228(a)(2), Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2207, 2210.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

Act Feb. 20, 1905, ch. 592, §§8, 13, 33 Stat. 726, 728.

#### Amendments

2020—Pub. L. 116–260, §228(a)(2), inserted "The Director may reconsider, and modify or set aside, a decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board under this section." at end.

Pub. L. 116–260, §225(d)(1), inserted "or a final decision by an examiner in an ex parte expungement proceeding or ex parte reexamination proceeding" after "registration of marks".

1958—Pub. L. 85–609 substituted "Trademark Trial and Appeal Board" for "Commissioner in person" and "fee" for "fees", and struck out "of interferences or" after "examiner in charge".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2020 Amendment

Amendment by section 225(d)(1) of div. Q of Pub. L. 116–260 effective upon the expiration of the 1-year period beginning on Dec. 27, 2020, and applicable to any mark registered before, on, or after that effective date, see section 225(g) of div. Q of Pub. L. 116–260, set out as a note under section 1064 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1958 Amendment

For effective date and applicability of amendment by Pub. L. 85–609, see section 3 of Pub. L. 85–609, set out as a note under section 1067 of this title.

#### Repeal and Effect on Existing Rights

Repeal of inconsistent provisions, effect of this chapter on pending proceedings and existing registrations and rights under prior acts, see notes set out under section 1051 of this title.

#### Construction of 2020 Amendment

For construction of amendment made by section 228(a)(2) of div. Q of Pub. L. 116–260 regarding Director's authority before Dec. 27, 2020, and authority with respect to particular decisions, see section 228(b) of div. Q of Pub. L. 116–260, set out as a note under section 1068 of this title.

#### Reorganization Plan No. 5 of 1950

Amendment by Pub. L. 85–609 as subject to Reorganization Plan No. 5 of 1950, see note set out under section 1067 of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of Commerce, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of Commerce, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 5 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1263, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
§ 590.30 At official plants. ( a ) Requirements within the scope of the Act with respect to premises, facilities, and operations of any official plant which are in addition to or different than those made under this part may not be imposed by any State or local jurisdiction except that any such jurisdiction may impose recordkeeping and other requirements within the scope of § 590.200, if consistent therewith, with respect to any such plant.
( b ) Labeling, packaging, or ingredient requirements in addition to or different than those made under this part, the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and the Fair Packaging and Labeling Act may not be imposed by any State or local jurisdiction with respect to egg products processed at any official plant in accordance with the requirements under this part and such Acts.
§ 319.6 Limitations with respect to use of Mechanically Separated (Species). ( a ) Meat food products required to be prepared from one species shall not contain Mechanically Separated (Species) of any other species.
( b ) Mechanically Separated (Species) described in § 319.5 that has a protein content of not less than 14 percent and a fat content of not more than 30 percent may constitute up to 20 percent of the livestock and poultry product portion of any meat food product except those listed in paragraph (d) of this section.
( c ) Mechanically Separated (Species) for processing described in § 319.5 may constitute up to 20 percent of the livestock and poultry product portion of any meat food product that is subject to a definition and standard of identity or composition in part 319 which establishes a maximum limit on the fat content of such meat food product except those listed in paragraph (d) of this section.
( d ) Mechanically Separated (Species) and Mechanically Separated (Species) for processing described in § 319.5 shall not be used in baby, junior, or toddler foods, ground beef, hamburger, fabricated steaks (§ 319.15 (a), (b), and (d)), barbecued meats (§ 319.80), roast beef-parboiled and steam roasted (§ 319.81), corned (cured) beef cuts (§§ 319.100-319.103), certain cured pork products (§§ 319.104 (a)-(e) and 319.106), tripe with milk (§ 319.308), lima beans with ham and similar products (§ 319.310), beef with gravy and gravy with beef (§ 319.313), and meat pies (§ 319.500).
[47 FR 28257, June 29, 1982]
### SUBCHAPTER II—ASBESTOS HAZARD EMERGENCY RESPONSE
§ 309.18 Official marks and devices for purposes of ante-mortem inspection. ( a ) All livestock required by this part to be identified as U.S. Suspects shall be tagged with a serially numbered metal ear tag bearing the term “U.S. Suspect,” except as provided in § 309.2(d) and except that cattle affected with epithelioma of the eye, antinomycosis, or actinobacillosis to such an extent that the lesions would be readily detected on post-mortem inspection, need not be individually tagged on ante-mortem inspection with the U.S. Suspect tag, provided that such cattle are segregated and otherwise handled as U.S. Suspects.
( b ) In addition, identification of U.S. Suspect swine must include the use of tattoos specified by the inspector to maintain the identity of the animals through the dehairing equipment when such equipment is used.
( c ) All livestock required by this part to be identified as U.S. Condemned shall be tagged with a serially numbered metal ear tag bearing the term “U.S. Condemned.”
( d ) The devices described in paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of this section shall be the official devices for identification of livestock required to be identified as U.S. Suspect or U.S. Condemned as provided in this part.