alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference inthe Registration Statement of Financial Security Assurance Holdings Ltd.on Form S-8 (File No. 33-78784) (1993 Equity ParticipationPlan) and Form S-8 (File No. 33-92648) (DeferredCompensation Plan) of:

1.                 Ourreport dated March 24, 2006, on our audits of the consolidated balancesheets of Financial Security Assurance Holdings Ltd. and Subsidiaries asof December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements ofoperations and comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity and cashflows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005and on our audits of the financial statement schedule relating to the consolidatedfinancial statements of Financial Security Assurance Holdings Ltd. andSubsidiaries, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.

| /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
| New York, New York             |
| March 24, 2006                 |

 

----
### §2779. Transportation to and from certain places of employment

(a) Whenever the Secretary determines that it is necessary for the effective conduct of the affairs of the Coast Guard, he may, at reasonable rates of fare fixed under regulations to be prescribed by him, provide assured and adequate transportation by motor vehicle or water carrier to and from their places of employment for individuals attached to, or employed by, the Coast Guard; and during a war or during a national emergency declared by Congress or the President, for individuals attached to, or employed in, a private plant that is manufacturing material for the Coast Guard.

(b) Transportation may not be provided under subsection (a) unless the Secretary or an officer designated by the Secretary, determines that—

(1) other transportation facilities are inadequate and cannot be made adequate;

(2) a reasonable effort has been made to induce operators of private facilities to provide the necessary transportation; and

(3) the service to be furnished will make proper use of transportation facilities and will supply the most efficient transportation to the individuals concerned.

(c) To provide transportation under subsection (a), the Secretary may—

(1) buy, lease, or charter motor vehicles or water carriers having a seating capacity of 12 or more passengers;

(2) maintain and operate that equipment by enlisted members or employees of the Coast Guard, or by private individuals under contract; and

(3) lease or charter the equipment to private or public carriers for operation under terms that are considered necessary by the Secretary or by an officer designated by the Secretary, and that may provide for the pooling of government-owned and privately owned equipment and facilities and for the reciprocal use of that equipment.

(d) Fares received under subsection (a), and proceeds of the leasing or chartering of equipment under subsection (c)(3), shall be covered into the Treasury as miscellaneous receipts.

(Added Pub. L. 96–376, §10(a), Oct. 3, 1980, 94 Stat. 1510, §660; amended Pub. L. 99–145, title XVI, §1623, Nov. 8, 1985, 99 Stat. 778; Pub. L. 99–550, §2(e), Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3070; renumbered §2779, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §116(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4226; Pub. L. 116–283, div. G, title LVXXXV [LXXXV], §8505(a)(46), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4750.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2021—Subsecs. (a), (b)(3), (c)(2). Pub. L. 116–283 substituted "individuals" for "persons" wherever appearing.

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 660 of this title as this section.

1986—Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 99–550 struck out subsec. (e) which provided that passenger motor vehicles of the United States could be used to provide transportation between the residence and place of work of the Commandant. See section 1344 of Title 31, Money and Finance.

1985—Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 99–145 added subsec. (e).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1985 Amendment

Pub. L. 99–145, title XVI, §1623, Nov. 8, 1985, 99 Stat. 778, provided that the amendment made by that section is effective Oct. 1, 1985.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-40744 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus STEVEN J. TOULOUSE, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:93-CR-64-1

- - - - - - - - - - February 24, 1997 Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Steven J. Toulouse appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to withdraw his plea agreement. Having reviewed the arguments and the record on appeal, we perceive no abuse of discretion by the district court. See United States v. Toulouse , 6:93-CR-64-1 (E.D. Tex. July 15, 1996). Toulouse also challenges the district court’s calculation, made pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2F1.1, of the amount of loss involved in the fraud. The district court did not commit clear error in making itsNo. 96-40744 - 2 - determination. See United States v. Wimbish , 980 F.2d 312, 313 (5th Cir. 1992).
AFFIRMED.
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-40958 Summary Calendar

__________________ LARRY D. BONEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus JAMES A. COLLINS, Executive Director; WAYNE SCOTT, Director; M.D. Hall, Warden, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-95-CV-276
- - - - - - - - - - June 24, 1996 Before POLITZ, KING and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM * Larry D. Boney appeals the dismissal of his civil rights suit pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Boney fails to raise a nonfrivolous issue on appeal. Because the appeal is frivolous, the appeal is DISMISSED. This court previously cautioned Boney to review any pending appeals in order to avoid the imposition of sanctions. See, e.g. , Boney v. Collins , No. 95-40742 (Dec. 18, 1995). BoneyNo. 95-40958 -2- continues to ignore our admonishment. Accordingly, Boney is BARRED from filing any pro se , in forma pauperis , civil appeal in this court, or any pro se , in forma pauperis , initial civil pleading in any court which is subject to this court’s jurisdiction, without the advance written permission of a judge of the forum court; the clerk of this court and the clerks of all federal district courts in this Circuit are directed to return to Boney, unfiled, any attempted submission inconsistent with this bar. APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS IMPOSED. See5th Cir. R. 42.2.
# C_2012174EN.01002302.xml

| 16.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 174/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 174/23

---

Order of the General Court of 16 April 2012 — F91 Diddeléng and Others v Commission

(Case T-341/10) (1)

1

(Action for annulment - Decision to take no further action on a complaint - Failure to bring an action for failure to fulfil obligations - No challengeable act - Inadmissibility)

2012/C 174/38

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: F91 Diddeléng (Dudelange, Luxembourg); Julien Bonnetaud (Yutz, France); Thomas Gruszczynski (Amnéville, France); Rainer Hauck (Maxdorf, Germany); Stéphane Martine (Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg); Grégory Molnar (Moyeuvre-Grande, France); and Yann Thibout (Algrange, France) (represented by L. Misson, C. Delrée and G. Ernes, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by G. Rozet and P. Van Nuffel, agents

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Fédération Luxembourgeoise de Football (FLF) (Mondercange, Luxembourg) (represented initially by K. Daly, solicitor, and D. Keane, SC, then by K. Daly)

Intervener in support of the defendant

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission’s decision of 31 June 2010 to take no action in regard to the complaint lodged by the applicants against the Fédération Luxembourgeoise de Football (FLF), seeking annulment of rules of the FLF infringing Articles 39 and 81 EC, and an application for any appropriate order.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The General Court orders:

| 1. | The action is dismissed as being inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as being inadmissible.

| 2. | F91 Diddeléng, Julien Bonnetaud, Thomas Gruszczynski, Rainer Hauck, Stéphane Martine, Grégory Molnar and Yann Thibout shall bear their own costs and pay those of the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

F91 Diddeléng, Julien Bonnetaud, Thomas Gruszczynski, Rainer Hauck, Stéphane Martine, Grégory Molnar and Yann Thibout shall bear their own costs and pay those of the European Commission.

| 3. | The Fédération luxembourgeoise de football (FLF) shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Fédération luxembourgeoise de football (FLF) shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 301, 6.11.2010.

1

---
#### WHITE v. HUGH CHATHAM MEMORIAL HOSPITAL

No. 71P90

Case below: 97 N.C.App. 130

Petition by defendant for discretionary review pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 denied 10 May 1990.
#### § 555.8 Loading or unloading of fish products in sealed transport conveyances.

The requirements in 9 CFR 325.17 governing the unloading of any meat or meat food product from an officially sealed railroad car, truck, or other means of conveyance containing any unmarked product or loading any means of conveyance after the product leaves an official establishment are applicable to fish and fish products.
§ 555.10 Provisions inapplicable to specimens for laboratory examination, etc., or to naturally inedible articles. The provisions of this part do not apply: ( a ) To specimens of product sent to or by the Department of Agriculture or divisions thereof in Washington, DC, or elsewhere, for laboratory examination, exhibition purposes, or other official use;
( b ) To material released for educational, research, and other nonfood purposes, as prescribed in § 540.2 of this subchapter;
( c ) To tissues for use in preparing pharmaceutical, organotherapeutic, or technical products and not used for human food, as described in § 540.2 of this subchapter;
( d ) To material or specimens of product for laboratory examination, research, or other nonhuman food purposes, when authorized by the Administrator, and under conditions prescribed by him in specific cases; and
( e ) To articles that are naturally inedible by humans.
#### In the Matter of Audrey J.S. Robert W.S., Jr., Respondent. Robert J. Kurre *&*Associates, P.C., Nonparty Appellant; Wallace L. Leinheardt, Nonparty Respondent.

[825 NYS2d 520]

In a proceeding pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law article 81, nonparty Robert J. Kurre *&*Associates, EC., appeals from so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Thomas, J.), dated August 22, 2005, as granted its request for an award of an attorney’s fee only to the extent of awarding it the sum of $7,500, inclusive of all disbursements.

Ordered that the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, to set forth the factors considered and the reasons for its determination with respect to the appellant’s request for an award of an attorney’s fee, and the appeal is held in abeyance in the interim. The Supreme Court, Queens County, shall file its report with all convenient speed.

*821“The Supreme Court has broad discretion in determining the reasonable amount to award as an attorney’s fee in a guardianship proceeding” *(Matter of Mavis L.,*285 AD2d 509, 510 [2001]; *see Matter of Tijuana M.,*303 AD2d 681, 682 [2003]). “However, it must provide a clear and concise explanation for its award in a written decision with reference to the following factors: (1) the time and labor required, the difficulty of the questions involved, and the skill required to handle the problems presented, (2) the attorney’s experience, ability, and reputation, (3) the amount involved and the benefit flowing to the ward as a result of the attorney’s services, (4) the fees awarded in similar cases, (5) the contingency or certainty of compensation, (6) the results obtained, and (7) the responsibility involved” *(Matter of Mavis L., supra*at 510).

Here, the order and judgment granting the appellant’s request for an award of an attorney’s fee only to the extent of awarding it the sum of $7,500, inclusive of all disbursements, did not contain an explanation for the amount of the award, and made no reference to any of the above factors. Accordingly, we remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for the purpose of setting forth the factors considered and the reasons for its award *(see Matter of Martha O.J.,*22 AD3d 756, 757 [2005]; *Matter of Catherine K.,*13 AD3d 534, 535 [2004]; *Matter of Enid B.,*7 AD3d 704, 705 [2004]). Schmidt, J.P., Ritter, Mastro, Fisher and Dillon, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 12.3

CERTIFICATION

I, Judy Tan, the Chief of FinanceGlobal Operations of Millicom International Cellular S.A., certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Millicom International Cellular S.A.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:





5.     The
company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's
auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
April 30, 2004

| |  | By: |  | /s/JUDY TAN
| |  | --- |  | -----------
| |  |     |  | Name:      
| |  |     |  | Title:     

Exh 12.3-1

---



QuickLinks
# C_2010221EN.01005602.xml

| 14.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/56 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/56

---

Action brought on 21 June 2010 — Wesergold Getränkeindustrie v OHIM — Lidl Stiftung (WESTERN GOLD)

(Case T-278/10)

()

2010/C 221/90

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Wesergold Getränkeindustrie GmbH & Co. KG (Rinteln, Germany) (represented by: P. Goldenbaum, I. Rohr und T. Melchert, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG (Neckarsulm, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 24 March 2010 in Case R 770/2009-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 24 March 2010 in Case R 770/2009-1;

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Lidl Stiftung & Co KG.

Applicant for a Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark WESTERN GOLD for goods in Class 33.

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Wesergold Getränkeindustrie GmbH & Co. KG

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited in opposition: a national and Community word mark WeserGold for goods in Classes 29, 31 and 32; a national and international word mark Wesergold for goods in Classes 29, 31 and 32 und a national word mark WESERGOLD for goods in Class 32.

Mark or sign cited in opposition:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld.

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal allowed, decision of the Opposition Division annulled.

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (1), as there is a likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue, infringement of Article 64(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, because the Board of Appeal did not remit the case or examine the substance of the opposition, also infringement of Article 75(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 on the basis of infringement of the applicant’s right to be heard, also infringement of Article 75(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 because the Board of Appeal failed to state the reasons for its decision.

Pleas in law:

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

1

---
MEMORANDUM 

TO: 

FROM: 

DATE: 

RE: 

Environmental Council 

Dale Morris, Chairman 

July 29, 2002 

Environmental Committee Meeting 

Thursday, August 15 

2:00 PM, 2nd Floor 

22 North Front Street 

~c'd 7/3o/ou r;..,e':f'~onal Chamber 

The Memphis and Shelby County Health Department recently introduced several amendments to the 

local air pollution control rules that cover local industries. The rule amendments have already been 

through two readings with the Shelby County Commission. However, prior to their fmal reading, 

Ms. Diane Arnst, Manager, Shelby County Air Pollution Control has agreed to review the proposed 

rule changes with the Memphis Regional Chamber of Commerce members and consider their 

comments or issues prior to pursuing the fmal reading of the amendments. 

The amendments appear to address several important issues, including when and for what reasons 

the Department may enter manufacturing plants, businesses, lots, grounds or premises, the 

classification of permit violations as a criminal offense, and the involvement of the State Division of 

Air Pollution control in the local program. The provisions as written will amend the following 

sections of the Shelby County Air Code: 

• Sections 3-3 - Penalties -Misdemeanor, Civil, and Noncompliance, in its entirety 

• Section 3-5 - Construction and Operating Permits 

• Section 3-10 - Variances, in its entirety 

• Reserved Section 3-13 - to become Right of Entry 

• Reserved Section 3-14 - shall become Emergency Episode Plan 

• Section 3-16 - Open Burning, replaced in its entirety 

• Section 3-18 - Volatile Organic Compounds 

• Reserved Section 3-26 - to become Transportation Conformity 

• Section 3-35 - Created; Membership; Terms of Office; Jurisdiction Hearings; Appeals 

The following are amendments to the Shelby County Code of Ordinances: 

• Section 14.5-27 - Allowable Uses for Emissions Fees 

• Section 14.5-28 - Emissions Fee for Stationary Sources, Appendix A (Emission Fee Rate) 

For the regulated community, this meeting offers the opportunity to review and comment on 

proposed rules that can impact your businesses prior to Codes amendments becoming final. 

If you would like an el«itronic copy of the amendments prior to the meeting, please send an e-mail 

request to Janelle Robinson at jrobinson@memphischamber.com. 

See you on August 15tb at 2 PM. 

22 North Front Street, Suite 200, Memphis, TN 38103 

P.O. Box 224, Memphis, TN 38101-0224 

901-543-3500 • fax 901-543-3510 

www.memphischamber.com
### §§2222, 2223. Repealed. Pub. L. 106–503, title I, §110(a)(1)(B), Nov. 13, 2000, 114 Stat. 2302

Section 2222, Pub. L. 93–498, §26, as added Pub. L. 96–121, §4, Nov. 16, 1979, 93 Stat. 864, related to an effectiveness study concerning smoke detectors, heat detectors, and sprinkler suppression systems.

Section 2223, Pub. L. 93–498, §27, as added Pub. L. 96–121, §5, Nov. 16, 1979, 93 Stat. 865, related to a firefighter safety study.
Estimado Prestatario:

¿Por qué le escribimos?

El Presidente ha declarado una Emergencia Nacional debido al brote de la enfermedad del Virus Corona 

(COVID-19). La Agencia de Desarrollo Rural está aquí para servirles.

¿Cómo podemos ayudarle?

• Asistencia de pago: Si sus ingresos se han reducido y no cree que puede hacer sus pagos, 

llámenos y pregunte por las ofertas de asistencia de pago. Revisaremos la información que 

usted nos provea y decidiremos si usted es elegible para asistencia de pago o para obtener más 

asistencia de la que está recibiendo actualmente.

• Asistencia de moratoria por 180 días: Si usted tiene dificultades financieras directa o 

indirectamente debido al COVID-19, usted puede llamarnos y solicitar una moratoria de pago. 

Prestatarios tienen la opción de cancelar la moratoria en cualquier momento o pedir una 

extensión de la moratoria por 180 días adicionales. 

¿Cómo nos puede contactar?

Llame a un representante de servicio del cliente al 1-800-414-1226 o TDD/TTY 1-800-438-1832. El 

centro de llamadas tiene horas extendidas desde las 7 a.m. hasta a las 7 p.m., de lunes a viernes (hora 

central) y desde las 8 a.m. hasta la 1 p.m. (hora central) los sábados. Tenga su número de cuenta y 

número de seguro social disponibles. Puede encontrar su cuenta online también y hacer un pago 

usando el enlace de préstamos hipotecarios de Desarrollo Rural https://rdhomeloans.usda.gov. Oprima 

el botón de registrarse o “Register” y siga los pasos si no tiene un ID de usuario y una contraseña.

Con los cambios repentinos que puedan surgir ante esta emergencia nacional, le comunicaremos 

cualquier cambio que ocurra con nuestro servicio.

Atentamente,

USDA, Desarrollo Rural, Centro de Servicio al Cliente