alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AFS-12-218-E February 10, 2012

Exemption No. 6029H Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2001-11170

Mr. John Monks Head of Quality, Customer Services & Repair Station General Manager

Airbus SAS

1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte 31707 Blagnac Cedex

France

Dear Mr. Monks:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 6029, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated October 13, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Adm inistration (FAA) on behalf of Airbus SAS (Airbus) for an extension of Exemption No. 6029, as amended. That exemption from §§ 145.103 and 145.107(c) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows the production units of the members and associated partners of the Airbus consortium to be certificated collectively under Airbus as a foreign repair station to support the operation of U.S.-registered Airbus A300, A310, A318, A319, A320, A330, A340, and A380 series aircraft. That exemption allows Airbus members and partners to perform maintenance to a common standard throughout its system. Further, the following spare parts distribution/support centers are included under that exemption and are part of the Airbus quality monitoring system: (1) Airspares, located in Hamburg, Germany; and (2) ASCO Spares, located in Ashburn, Virginia, United States. Airbus is responsible for ensuring that all units and facilities perform maintenance in accordance to Airbus repair station standards and requirements as identified by the appropriate Airbus manual system.

The FAA notes the need to add the A321 series aircraft, which currently is not included in Exemption No. 6029, as amended.2

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register . The requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Airbus.

Our Decision

The FAA has determ ined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 6029, as amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the term ination date of Exemption No. 6029, as amended, to February 28, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 6029, as amended, remain the same. This letter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 6029.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan Acting Director, Flight Standards

Service
Exhibit 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of SUNBURST ACQUISITIONS V, INC.
(the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending October 31, 2005, (the "Report"), I,
Terence Ho, Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)	The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the Company's financial position and results of
operations.

Date: March 15, 2006

	/s/ Terence Ho
	Director
#### §§ 50.15-50.16 [Reserved]
# C_2007129EN.01000202.xml

| 9.6.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/2

---

Appeal brought on 21 February 2007 by É. R. and Others against the judgment delivered by the Court of First Instance (First Chamber) on 13 December 2006 in Case T-138/03 É.R. and Others v Council and Commission

(Case C-100/07 P)

(2007/C 129/03)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellants: É.R, J.R, A.R, B.R, O.O, T.D, V.D, J.M.D, D.D, D.F, E.E, C.F, M.R, I.R, B.R, M.R, C.S. (represented by: F. Honnorat, lawyer)

Appellants:

Other parties to the proceedings: Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities

Other parties to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

| — | declare the appeal admissible; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the appeal admissible;

| — | declare the appeal to be well founded; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the appeal to be well founded;

| — | set aside the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities (First Chamber) of 13 December 2006 in Case T-138/03; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities (First Chamber) of 13 December 2006 in Case T-138/03;

| — | order the case to be referred back to the Court of First Instance to rule on the appellants' claims. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the case to be referred back to the Court of First Instance to rule on the appellants' claims.

Pleas in law and main arguments

By their appeal, the appellants seek to have the contested judgment set aside in so far as it rejected their application as being partly inadmissible and partly unfounded.

First, as regards the admissibility of their appeal, the appellants submit that the reasoning of the Court is contradictory and that, by holding that the action for compensation resulting from the infection and death of Mr H.E.R was brought after the expiry of the 5-year limitation period, the Court violated both Article 46 of the Statute of the Court of Justice and Article 6(1) of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. In that connection, the appellants submit that since at the time their applications were considered they did not have epidemiological data capable of accurately pinpointing the date of on which their relatives became infected, the Court could not declare that their action was time-barred.

Second, as regards the consideration of the substance of the case, the appellants submit that the Court also adopted contradictory reasoning and violated Article 6(1) of the convention cited above, on one hand, by basing its judgment on old reports and by failing to taken account of the most recent epidemiological data and, on the other hand, by holding that the existence of a causal link between the harm alleged and the alleged unlawful conduct by the Community institutions was not established.

---
Certification  Pursuant  to  Sections  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002

Pursuant  to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b)  of  Section  1350, Chapter 63 or Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned  officers  of  Proteo,  Inc. (the "Company") does hereby certify, to
such  officer's  knowledge,  that:

The  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the three month period ended September
30, 2003 of the Company fully  complies,  in  all  material  respects,  with the
requirements  of  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 or other
document  authentications,  acknowledging,  or  otherwise adopting the signature
that  appears  in  typed  form  within  the  electronic  version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided by Proteo, Inc. and will be
retained by Proteo, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or  its  staff  upon  request.



/s/  Joerg  Alte
Joerg  Alte
Chief  Executive  Officer
Chief  Financial  Officer





November 18,  2003
### §1155. Contract termination

(a) In General.—

(1) Notification.—Before terminating a procurement or acquisition contract with a total value of more than $1,000,000, the Commandant of the Coast Guard shall notify each vendor under such contract and require the vendor to maintain all work product related to the contract until the earlier of—

(A) not less than 1 year after the date of the notification; or

(B) the date the Commandant notifies the vendor that maintenance of such work product is no longer required.

(b) Work Product Defined.—In this section the term "work product"—

(1) means tangible and intangible items and information produced or possessed as a result of a contract referred to in subsection (a); and

(2) includes—

(A) any completed end items;

(B) any uncompleted end items; and

(C) any property in the contractor's possession in which the United States Government has an interest.

(c) Penalty.—A vendor that fails to maintain work product as required under subsection (a) is liable to the United States for a civil penalty of not more than $25,000 for each day on which such work product is unavailable.

(d) Report.—

(1) In general.—Except as provided in paragraph (2), not later than 45 days after the end of each fiscal year the Commandant of the Coast Guard shall provide to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate a report detailing—

(A) all Coast Guard contracts with a total value of more than $1,000,000 that were terminated in the fiscal year;

(B) all vendors who were notified under subsection (a)(1) in the fiscal year, and the date of such notification;

(C) all criminal, administrative, and other investigations regarding any contract with a total value of more than $1,000,000 that were initiated by the Coast Guard in the fiscal year;

(D) all criminal, administrative, and other investigations regarding contracts with a total value of more than $1,000,000 that were completed by the Coast Guard in the fiscal year; and

(E) an estimate of costs incurred by the Coast Guard, including contract line items and termination costs, as a result of the requirements of this section.

(2) Limitation.—The Commandant is not required to provide a report under paragraph (1) for any fiscal year for which there is no responsive information as described in subparagraphs (A) through (E) of paragraph (1).

(Added Pub. L. 115–232, div. C, title XXXV, §3523(a), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 2315, §657; renumbered §1155, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §108(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4208.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 657 of this title as this section.
### **CHAPTER 39A—SPECIAL PACKAGING OF HOUSEHOLD SUBSTANCES FOR PROTECTION OF CHILDREN**

Sec.
1471.
Definitions.
1472.
Special packaging standards.
1472a.
Special packaging for liquid nicotine containers.
1473.
Conventional packages, marketing.
1474.
Regulations for special packaging standards.
1475.
Repealed.
1476.
Preemption of Federal standards.
1477.
Enforcement by State Attorneys General.
USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender.

STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Publishes Final Rule on Income Limits and Other Eligibility Rules for Single-Family 

Housing Loans

 WASHINGTON, June 28, 2019 – Acting Assistant to the Secretary for Rural Development Joel Baxley today 

announced that USDA has simplified income eligibility, asset rules and area loan limit determinations for the 

Department’s single-family housing loan programs. 

 USDA has created a two-tier income structure for eligibility for USDA single-family housing loans. One 

category is for one- to four-person households. A second category is for five- to eight-person households. 

Certain types of assets – such as retirement and education savings – are excluded when calculating an 

applicant’s down payment ability. 

These changes are effective July 22, 2019.

Effective Aug. 5, 2019, loan limits in USDA’s single-family housing programs will be determined using a 

percentage of the Federal Housing Administration’s loan limits. This new methodology will allow for more new 

construction within USDA’s single-family housing loan programs.

For complete information, see page 29034 of the June 21 Federal Register.

#

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender.

#
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

GUMBO BROTHERS, LLC

 v.

QUEEN'S WALK, L.P., MONTROSE

INVESTMENTS, LLC, RICHARD KOWIT,

MICHAEL GARNICK AND MICHAEL

MCCANN

 v.

MICHAEL COLAIZZO

PETITION OF: MICHAEL COLAIZZO

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 191 EAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 16th day of October, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1418

AN ACT

To provide for the holding of court at Natchez, Mississippi,

in the same manner as court is held at Vicksburg, Mississippi, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1418 ES

1 SECTION 1. HOLDING OF COURT AT NATCHEZ, MISSISSIPPI.

2 Section 104(b)(3) of title 28, United States Code, is

3 amended in the second sentence by striking all beginning

4 with the colon through ‘‘United States’’.

Passed the Senate November 5, 1999.

Attest:

Secretary.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1418

AN ACT

To provide for the holding of court at Natchez,

Mississippi, in the same manner as court is heldat Vicksburg, Mississippi, and for other purposes.
### §1295. "Persons" defined

As used in this chapter, "persons" means any individual, partnership, corporation, or unincorporated association or any combination or association thereof.

(Pub. L. 87–331, §5, Sept. 30, 1961, 75 Stat. 732.)
§ 3.7 Content of a rulemaking petition. ( a ) DHS will be better positioned to understand and respond to a rulemaking petition if the petition describes with reasonable particularity the rule that the petitioner is asking DHS to issue, amend, or repeal, and the factual and legal basis for the petition. For instance, DHS would be better able to understand and respond to a petition that includes— ( 1 ) A description of the specific problem that the requested rulemaking would address;
( 2 ) An explanation of how the requested rulemaking would resolve this problem;
( 3 ) Data and other information that would be relevant to DHS's consideration of the petition;
( 4 ) A description of the substance of the requested rulemaking; and
( 5 ) Citation to the pertinent existing regulations provisions (if any) and pertinent DHS legal authority for taking action.
( b ) [Reserved]
### §§1091 to 1095. Repealed. Pub. L. 92–181, title V, §5.26(a), Dec. 10, 1971, 85 Stat. 624

Section 1091, act July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title II, §208(a), as added Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 252, title I, §2, 42 Stat. 1458; amended Ex. Ord. No. 6084, Mar. 27, 1933; Aug. 19, 1937, ch. 704, §20, 50 Stat. 710, authorized Comptroller of the Currency to furnish reports of condition of banks and other lending institutions rediscounting with intermediate credit banks and covered examinations and audit of credit banks.

Section 1092, act July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title II, §208(b), as added Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 252, title I, §2, 42 Stat. 1458; amended Ex. Ord. No. 6084, Mar. 27, 1933; Aug. 2, 1966, Pub. L. 89–525, §3(b), 80 Stat. 334, authorized Farm Credit Administration to require reports from intermediate credit banks.

Section 1093, act July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title II, §208(c), as added Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 252, title I, §2, 42 Stat. 1458; amended Ex. Ord. No. 6084, Mar. 27, 1933; Aug. 19, 1937, ch. 704, §20, 50 Stat. 710; Aug. 18, 1959, Pub. L. 86–168, title I, §104(g), 73 Stat. 387, covered investigations and reports by farm credit appraisers and examiners.

Section 1094, act July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title II, §208(d), as added Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 252, title I, §2, 42 Stat. 1458; amended Ex. Ord. No. 6084, Mar. 27, 1933, authorized assessment of cost of investigations and examination against organization investigated.

Section 1095, act July 17, 1916, ch. 245, title II, §208(e), as added June 3, 1935, ch. 164, §8, 49 Stat. 316; amended Aug. 23, 1935, ch. 614, §203(a), 49 Stat. 704; Aug. 19, 1937, ch. 704, §31, 50 Stat. 716, provided for reports on condition of institutions receiving loans or deposits.
### §2765. Retroactive payment of pay and allowances delayed by administrative error or oversight

Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary, the Coast Guard may authorize retroactive payment of pay and allowances, including selective reenlistment bonuses, to enlisted members if entitlement to the pay and allowances was delayed in vesting solely because of an administrative error or oversight.

(Added Pub. L. 100–448, §13(a), Sept. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 1844, §513; renumbered §2765, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §116(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4226.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 513 of this title as this section.
§ 332.10 Deselection of ineligible establishments. ( a ) The Administrator will deselect a selected establishment that becomes ineligible to participate in a cooperative interstate shipment program for any reason listed under § 332.3(c) of this part.
( b ) An establishment that has been deselected must transition to become an official establishment as provided in § 332.11 of this part.
§ 3.50 Facilities, general. ( a ) *Structural strength.* Indoor and outdoor housing facilities for rabbits shall be structurally sound and shall be maintained in good repair, to protect the animals from injury, to contain the animals, and to restrict the entrance of other animals.
( b ) *Water and electric power.* Reliable and adequate electric power, if required to comply with other provisions of this subpart, and adequate potable water shall be available.
( c ) *Storage.* Supplies of food and bedding shall be stored in facilities which adequately protect such supplies against infestation or contamination by vermin. Refrigeration shall be provided for supplies of perishable food.
( d ) *Waste disposal.* Provision shall be made for the removal and disposal of animal and food wastes, bedding, dead animals, and debris. Disposal facilities shall be so provided and operated as to minimize vermin infestation, odors, and disease hazards.
( e ) *Washroom and sinks.* Facilities, such as washrooms, basins, or sinks, shall be provided to maintain cleanliness among animal caretakers.
[32 FR 3273, Feb. 24, 1967, as amended at 44 FR 63492, Nov. 2, 1979]
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Kenneth Frank Kreisa, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 12234;

Fourth District

December 30, 1974.

Marvin H. Gesell, Public Defender, of Bloomington, for appellant.

Paul R. Welch, State’s Attorney, of Bloomington, and Steven M. Helm, Senior Law Student, for the People.

Opinion by

Mr. JUSTICE SMITH.
**EXHIBIT 21**

**SUBSIDIARIESOFFINANCIAL SECURITY ASSURANCE HOLDINGS LTD.**
| 1. |   | Financial Security Assurance Inc. (incorporated in  the State of New York)        |   |   |
|----|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| 2. |   | Financial Security  Assurance International Ltd. (incorporated in Bermuda)        |   |   |
| 3. |   | Financial Security  Assurance (U.K.) Limited (incorporated in the United Kingdom) |   |   |
| 4. |   | FSA Asset Management  Services LLC (organized in the State of Delaware)           |   |   |
| 5. |   | FSA Capital Markets  Services LLC (organized in the State of Delaware)            |   |   |
| 6. |   | FSA Capital Management  Services LLC (organized in the State of Delaware)         |   |   |
| 7. |   | FSA Global Funding  Limited (incorporated in the Cayman Islands)                  |   |   |
| 8. |   | FSA Insurance Company  (incorporated in the State of Oklahoma)                    |   |   |

 

----
### §1701z–17. Increasing access and understanding of energy efficient mortgages

#### (a) Definition

As used in this section, the term "energy efficient mortgage" has the same meaning as given that term in paragraph (24) of section 12704 of title 42.

#### (b) Recommendations to eliminate barriers to use of energy efficient mortgages

#### (1) In general

Not later than 180 days after July 30, 2008, the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, in conjunction with the Secretary of Energy and the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, shall consult with the residential mortgage industry and States to develop recommendations to eliminate the barriers that exist to increasing the availability, use, and purchase of energy efficient mortgages, including such barriers as—

(A) the lack of reliable and accessible information on such mortgages, including estimated energy savings and other benefits of energy efficient housing;

(B) the confusion regarding underwriting requirements and differences among various energy efficient mortgage programs;

(C) the complex and time consuming process of securing such mortgages;

(D) the lack of publicly available research on the default risk of such mortgages; and

(E) the availability of certified or accredited home energy rating services.

#### (2) Report to Congress

The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development shall submit a report to Congress that—

(A) summarizes the recommendations developed under paragraph (1); and

(B) includes any recommendations for statutory, regulatory, or administrative changes that the Secretary deems necessary to institute such recommendations.

#### (c) Energy efficient mortgages outreach campaign

#### (1) In general

The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, in consultation and coordination with the Secretary of Energy, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, and State Energy and Housing Finance Directors, shall carry out an education and outreach campaign to inform and educate consumers, home builders, residential lenders, and other real estate professionals on the availability, benefits, and advantages of—

(A) improved energy efficiency in housing; and

(B) energy efficient mortgages.

#### (2) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as are necessary to carry out the education and outreach campaign described under paragraph (1).

(Pub. L. 110–289, div. B, title IX, §2902, July 30, 2008, 122 Stat. 2876.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Foreclosure Prevention Act of 2008, and also as part of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008, and not as part of the National Housing Act which comprises this chapter.