alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 1000.2 Definitions.

As used in this part:

*Board* means the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board, established by the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007, Public Law 110-53.

*Chairman* means the Chairman of the Board, as appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate under section 801(a) of the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007, Public Law 110-53.

*Executive Director* means the individual appointed by the Chairman to act as the Executive Director (or, in the event the Chairman position is vacant, by the Board) to discharge the responsibilities assigned to the Executive Director.

*General Counsel* means the individual appointed by the Chairman to act as the chief legal officer of the Board or, if the General Counsel is absent or unavailable, the Deputy General Counsel, or in the event both positions are vacant, the individual(s) designated by the Chairman (or, in the event the Chairman position is vacant, by the Board) to discharge the responsibilities assigned to the General Counsel. If both the General Counsel and Deputy General Counsel are absent and unavailable for a prolonged period of time, the Chairman (or the Board in the event the Chairman position is vacant) may designate any Staff Member who is an active member of the bar of any state, territory, or the District of Columbia to temporarily discharge the responsibilities assigned to the General Counsel until the General Counsel or Deputy General Counsel is again available or a successor has been duly appointed.

*Member* means an individual appointed by the President, with the advice and consent of the Senate, to be a member of the Board.

[78 FR 33689, June 5, 2013, as amended at 84 FR 36456, July 29, 2019]
#### Studebaker Brothers Company of New York, Appellant, v. John C. Calderwood, Respondent.

Judgment of the Municipal Court reversed and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event, on the ground that the justice should have found in favor of the plaintiff the fair and true value of the items of the plaintiff’s claim in addition to the two of sixty-one dollars and thirty dollars and fifty cents, which were allowed, and that the so-called counterclaim should have been disallowed. Woodward, Jenks; Gaynor and Rich, JJ., concurred; Hooker, J., dissented.
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Invites Applications to Help Disadvantaged Groups Strengthen Capacity

WASHINGTON, June 23, 2021 – The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) today announced that it is 

seeking applications for grants under the Socially-Disadvantaged Groups Grant program.

The purpose of this program is to provide technical assistance to socially-disadvantaged groups in rural areas. 

Eligible applicants include cooperatives, groups of cooperatives and cooperative development centers with a 

majority of its board of directors or governing board comprised of individuals who are members of socially 

disadvantaged groups. A socially-disadvantaged group is one whose members have been subjected to racial, 

ethnic or gender prejudice because of their identity as members of a group and without regard to their individual 

qualities. 

This program supports Rural Development’s mission to improve the quality of life for rural Americans and 

commitment to direct agency resources to those who most need them. Grant funds may used only for the benefit 

of socially-disadvantaged groups in rural areas. 

For FY 2021, USDA plans to award up to $3 million in grants. The maximum grant award is $175,000. Grants 

may be used to develop and operate a Rural Cooperative Development Center that could provide the following 

technical assistance and other services to rural socially-disadvantaged groups and businesses:

• Conducting feasibility studies

• Developing business plans

• Providing leadership and operational improvement training

Completed applications must be submitted electronically through Grants.gov no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern 

Time on Aug. 9, 2021. For additional information, see page 32882 of the June 23 Federal Register.

Questions about the application process may be directed to the Rural Development State Office where the 

applicant is located. For a list of offices, visit the RD state office website. 

If you’d like to subscribe to USDA Rural Development updates, visit our GovDelivery subscriber page.

###

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Eugene B.Johnson, certify that:

1.                 I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FairPoint Communications, Inc.(the “Company”);

2.                 Based on myknowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.                 Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for,the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.                 The Company’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the Company and we have:

(i)            designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this quarterly report was being prepared;

(ii)        evaluated theeffectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisquarterly report; and

(iii)    disclosed in this report anychange in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Company’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of a quarterly report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

5.                 The Company’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’sauditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent function):

(i)            all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

(ii)        any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: November 3,2006 

|     | /s/ EUGENE B. JOHNSON      |   |
|----------|----------------------------|--------|
|     | Eugene B. Johnson          |
| * * | *Chief  Executive Officer* |

 

----
1

Memo 

To: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0799 

From: Joseph McDonald, U.S. EPA-OTAQ-ASD 

CC: Ed Nam, U.S. EPA-OTAQ-ASD 

Date: October 6, 2010 

Re: Technical papers on the Argonne National Laboratory Battery Cost Model 

Hard copies of papers presented at the 2009 EVS-24 conference and pending publication at the 2010 

EVS-25 conference regarding the Argonne National Laboratory Battery Cost Model are available within 

EPA’s Docket Center. The specific citations are: 

• Nelson, P.A., Santini, D.J., Barnes, J. "Factors Determining the Manufacturing Costs of LithiumIon Batteries for PHEVs," 24th World Battery, Hybrid and Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle 

Symposium and Exposition EVS-24, Stavenger, Norway, May 13-16, 2009 (www.evs24.org). 

• Santini, D.J., Gallagher, K.G., and Nelson, P.A. "Modeling of Manufacturing Costs of Lithium-Ion 

Batteries for HEVs, PHEVs, and EVs," Paper to be presented at the 25th World Battery, 

Hybrid and Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Symposium and Exposition, EVS-25, Shenzhen, China, 

November 5-9, 2010 (www.evs25.org). Advance draft provided by D.J. Santini, Argonne 

National Laboratory, August 24, 2010. 

The documents have been copyrighted and are not available within the electronic docket. Parties that 

wish to view hard copies of these documents can do so at the at the EPA Docket Center: Air and 

Radiation Docket and Information Center, EPA/DC, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., 

NW, Washington DC. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-

1744, and the telephone number for the Air Docket is (202) 566-1742.
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Glenn Benes, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 59118;

First District (5th Division)

November 8, 1974.

James J. Doherty, Public Defender, of Chicago (Paul D. Katz, Assistant Public Defender, of counsel), for appellant.

Bernard Carey, State’s Attorney, of Chicago (Patrick T. Driscoll, Jr., Rea Markin, and Mary Ellen Dienes, Assistant State’s Attorneys, of counsel), for the People.

PER CURIAM.
### §708. Department of Health and Human Services

(a) The Commandant may assist the Secretary of Health and Human Services in providing medical emergency helicopter transportation services to civilians. The Commandant may prescribe conditions, including reimbursement, under which resources may be provided under this section. The following specific limitations apply to assistance provided under this section:

(1) Assistance may be provided only in areas where Coast Guard units able to provide the assistance are regularly assigned. Coast Guard units may not be transferred from one area to another to provide the assistance.

(2) Assistance may be provided only to the extent it does not interfere with the performance of the Coast Guard mission.

(3) Providing assistance may not cause an increase in amounts required for the operation of the Coast Guard.

(b) An individual (or the estate of that individual) who is authorized by the Coast Guard to provide a service under a program established under subsection (a) and who is acting within the scope of that individual's duties is not liable for injury to, or loss of, property or personal injury or death that may be caused incident to providing the service.

(Added Pub. L. 97–295, §2(6)(A), Oct. 12, 1982, 96 Stat. 1301, §147a; renumbered §708, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §106(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4203.)

| Revised Section | Source (U.S. Code) | Source (Statutes at Large) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 147a | 14:141 (note). | July 1, 1977, Pub. L. 95–61, §8, 91 Stat. 260. |

In subsection (a), the words "Secretary of Health and Human Services" are substituted for "Department of Health, Education, and Welfare" because of 20:3508(b) and because the responsibility is in the head of the Department. The word "may" is substituted for "is authorized to" for clarity. The word "conditions" is substituted for "terms and conditions" because it is inclusive. The words "deems appropriate" are omitted as unnecessary. The words "The following . . . limitations apply" are substituted for "shall be subject to the following . . . limitations" for clarity.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 708 was renumbered section 3708 of this title.

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 147a of this title as this section.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Similar Provisions

Similar provisions were contained in section 8 of Pub. L. 95–61 which was formerly set out as a note under section 141 (now 701) of this title.
§ 93.215 Special provisions. ( a ) *In-bond shipments from Canada.* ( 1 ) Poultry from Canada transported in-bond through the United States for immediate export shall be inspected at the border port of entry and, when accompanied by an import permit obtained under § 93.204 of this part and all conditions therein are observed, shall be allowed entry into the United States and shall be otherwise handled as provided in paragraph (b) of § 93.201. Poultry not accompanied by a permit shall meet the requirements of this part in the same manner as poultry destined for importation into the United States, except that the Administrator may permit their inspection at some other point when he or she finds that such action will not increase the risk that communicable disease of livestock and poultry will be disseminated to the livestock or poultry of the United States.
( 2 ) *In-transit shipments through Canada.* Poultry originating in the United States and transported directly through Canada may re-enter the United States without Canadian health or test certificates when accompanied by copies of the United States export health certificates properly issued and endorsed in accordance with regulations in part 91 of this chapter: *Provided,* That, to qualify for entry, the date, time, port of entry, and signature of the Canadian Port Veterinarian that inspected the poultry for entry into Canada shall be recorded on the United States health certificate, or a document containing the information shall be included with the certificate that accompanies the poultry. In all cases it shall be determined by the veterinary inspector at the United States port of entry that the poultry are the identical poultry covered by said certificate.
( b ) *Exhibition poultry.* Poultry from the United States which have been exhibited at the Royal Agricultural Winter Fair at Toronto or other publicly recognized expositions in Canada, including racing, rodeo, circus, or stage exhibitions in Canada, and have not been in that region for more than 90 days are eligible for return to the United States without Canadian health or test certificates, if they are accompanied by copies of the United States health certificate, issued and endorsed in accordance with the export regulations contained in part 91 of this chapter for entry into Canada: *Provided,* That all poultry offered for re-entry upon examination by the veterinary inspector at the U.S. port of entry, are found by the inspector to be free of communicable diseases and exposure thereto and are determined to be the identical poultry covered by said certificates or that they otherwise qualified for entry into Canada under the Canadian regulations.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0020) [55 FR 31495, Aug. 2, 1990, as amended at 59 FR 67133, Dec. 29, 1994. Redesignated and amended at 62 FR 56012, 56015, Oct. 28, 1997; 81 FR 40151, June 21, 2016]
### §1248. Repealed. June 25, 1948, ch. 645, §21, 62 Stat. 862, eff. Sept. 1, 1948

Section, act Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 252, title II, §209(h), 42 Stat. 1468, related to false statements in inspection reports. See section 1014 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure.
##### 



Exhibit 99.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NationsRent, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, D. Clark Ogle, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

May 8, 2003

/s/ D. CLARK OGLE

D. Clark Ogle
Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Announces Release of Rural Housing Investment Data

Increases Transparency to Better Serve Rural America

(July 22, 2016) – USDA Rural Development Deputy Under Secretary Lillian Salerno today 

announced that the Rural Housing Service (RHS) is releasing a suite of investment data to increase 

transparency and better educate stakeholders and appropriators about RHS program investments. The 

data suite includes information about loans, loan guarantees, and grants invested through RHS Single 

Family Housing, Multi-family Housing, and Community Facilities programs. 

The data suite on RHS-wide investments can be found in three places: (1) on USDA’s Service Center 

Agencies Online Services page, (2) on Data.gov, and (3) in PolicyMap, an online data mapping tool, 

where it can be overlaid with a wide array of other indicators. 

The release of this data is one component of the Department-wide effort to become more transparent 

in order to facilitate more effective collaboration with USDA’s stakeholders, partners, and 

lawmakers to address rural community needs Nationwide.

To learn more about USDA Rural Development programs visit www.rd.usda.gov or contact your 

local USDA Rural Development State Office today.

#

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender. To file a complaint of discrimination, 

write: USDA, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, Office of Adjudication, 1400 

Independence Ave., SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (866) 632-9992 (Toll-free Customer 

Service), (800) 877-8339 (Local or Federal relay), (866) 377-8642 (Relay voice users).
**Exhibit 13.3**

** **

**GRUPO TELEVISA, S.A.B. SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

I, Carlos Ferreiro Rivas, the Corporate Vice President of Finance (Principal Financial Officer) of Grupo Televisa, S.A.B. (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

1.                                      The Company’s annual report on Form 20-F/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, to which this statement is filed as an exhibit (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: February 14, 2018

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Carlos   Ferreiro Rivas |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------|
|   |   | Name:                       | Carlos Ferreiro   Rivas |
|   |   | Title:                      | Vice President of   Finance (Principal Financial Officer) |

 

----
### §1023a. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 85–459, title III, June 13, 1958, 72 Stat. 199, which related to availability of funds for administrative expenses, was from the Department of Agriculture and Farm Credit Administration Appropriation Act, 1959, and was not repeated in subsequent appropriation acts.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Similar Provisions

Similar provisions were contained in the following prior appropriation acts:

Aug. 2, 1957, Pub. L. 85–118, title IV, 71 Stat. 339.

June 4, 1956, ch. 355, title IV, 70 Stat. 240.

May 23, 1955, ch. 43, title IV, 69 Stat. 62.

June 29, 1954, ch. 409, title IV, 68 Stat. 318.

July 28, 1953, ch. 251, title II, 67 Stat. 222.

July 5, 1952, ch. 574, title II, 66 Stat. 353.

Aug. 31, 1951, ch. 374, title III, 65 Stat. 244.

Sept. 6, 1950, ch. 896, Ch. VI, title II, 64 Stat. 678.

June 29, 1949, ch. 280, title II, 63 Stat. 346, 347.
(66 South. 395)

No. 20769.

#### STATE v. MAROUN.

(Nov. 4, 1914.)

*(Syllabus by Editorial Staff.)*

Criminal Law &wkey;>322, 446 — Presumptions — Official Action — Documentary Evidence.

In a prosecution for selling liquors without a license, the recital in an ordinance of a police jury establishing prohibition is sufficient proof, in the absence of contrary evidence, of an election having been held; since a presumption of correctness attaches to official acts, and since the recital was in the nature of a finding of fact made by a high, public functionary in the regular course of the administration of the local government after investigation.

[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 728, 1032; Dec. Dig. <§=> 322, 446.]

Appeal from First Judicial District Court, Parish of Caddo; John R. Land, Judge.

N. Maroun was convicted of selling liquors without a license, and he appeals.

Affirmed.

E. P. Mills, of Shreveport, for appellant. R. G. Pleasant, Atty. Gen., W. A. Mabry, Dist. Atty.. of Shreveport (G. A. Gondran, of New Orleans, of. counsel), for the State.

PROVOSTY, J.

On a trial for selling liquors without a license, an ordinance of the police jury establishing prohibition, which recites that an election was held for voting *55whether the sale of liquors should be allowed or prohibited, is sufficient proof, in the absence of any evidence to the contrary, of such an election having been held. The reason is that, as a presumption of correctness attaches to official acts (16 Cye. 1076), and as said ordinance could not have been validly adopted without an election having been held, its adoption is at least prima facie proof of the election having been held. Whether it is not juris et de jure proof until set aside in a direct suit — quaere? See State ex rel. Police Jury v. Judge, 43 La. Ann. 125, 9 South. 348. Moreover, the said recital of the election having been held is something more than the mere unsworn statement of the individuals composing the police jury. The police jury was the regularly constituted authority for holding the said election and ascertaining and reporting on its result. Said recital is therefore in the nature of a finding of fact made by a high public functionary, in the regular course of the administration of the local government, after investigation. See Wigmore on Ev. pars. 1633, 1635, 1670; Evanston v. Gunn, 99 U. S. 660, 25 L. Ed. 306.

Judgment affirmed.