alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Harold Pittman *et al.,*Defendants-Appellants.

(Nos. 74-27, 74-77 cons.;

Fifth District

January 13, 1975.

EARNS and CARTER, JJ., took no part.

Paul Bradley and Kenneth L. Jones, both of State Appellate Defender’s Office, of Chicago, for appellants.

Robert H. Rice, State’s Attorney, of Belleville (Robert L. Craig, Assistant State’s Attorney, of counsel), for the People.

PER CURIAM:

Appellants were convicted of murder in St. Clair County in 1969 and were sentenced to death. On appeal, the supreme court vacated the death sentence and remanded the case for resentencing *(People v. Pittman,*55 Ill.2d 39, 302 N.E.2d 7). Although the defendants requested sentencing hearings, none were held, and the trial court ruling that the record of the original trial contained sufficient information on which to base the sentence of 20 to 50 years’ imprisonment. This appeal was taken from the imposition of sentence.

Appellants contend and the State concedes that the denial of sentencing hearings to these defendants, as required by section 5 — 5—3 of *1090the Unified Code of Corrections (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 38, par. 1005— 5 — 3), was error. We agree. We therefore reverse the judgment of the circuit court imposing sentence in this cause and remand the cause for resentencing before which appellants are to be afforded the benefit of procedures outlined in the Unified Code of Corrections.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Mr. JUSTICE EARNS and Mr. JUSTICE CARTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
#### § 390.2 Published materials.

FSIS rules and regulations relating to its regulatory responsibilities and administrative procedures are published and made available to the public in the Federal Register and codified in chapter III, title 9, of the Code of Federal Regulations. FSIS also issues numerous publications relating to Agency programs, which implement the laws listed in the Delegation of Authority, 7 CFR 2.15(a). Most of these publications are available free from the USDA Publications Division, Office of Governmental and Public Affairs, or at established rates from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, 20402-9328.
#### § 381.160 (Kind) burgers; (Kind) patties.

Such product consists of 100 percent poultry of the kind indicated, with skin and fat not in excess of natural proportions. Product containing fillers or binders shall be named “(Kind) Patties.”
#### § 325.3 Product transported within the United States as part of export movement.

When any shipment of any product is offered to any carrier for transportation within the United States as a part of an export movement, the same certificate shall be required as if the shipment were destined to a point within the United States.
### §4710. Collection and compilation of information

The Fund shall—

(1) collect and compile information pertinent to community development financial institutions that will assist in creating, developing, expanding, and preserving such institutions; and

(2) make such information available to promote the purposes of this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 103–325, title I, §111, Sept. 23, 1994, 108 Stat. 2177.)
#### § 381.169 [Reserved]
#### § 381.81 Tuberculosis.

Carcasses of poultry affected with tuberculosis shall be condemned.
§ 381.180 Information and reports required from official establishment operators. ( a ) The operator of each official establishment shall furnish to Program employees accurate information as to all matters needed by them for making their daily reports of the amount of products prepared or handled in the departments of the establishment to which they are assigned and such reports concerning sanitation, mandatory microbiological testing, and other aspects of the operations of the establishment and the conduct of inspection thereat, as may be required by the Administrator in special cases.
( b ) The operator of each official establishment shall also make such other reports as the Administrator may from time to time require under the Act.
[37 FR 9706, May 16, 1972, as amended at 61 FR 38868, July 25, 1996]
<PAGE>

                     AMENDMENT TO COMMON STOCK PURCHASE WARRANT

     THIS AMENDMENT TO COMMON STOCK PURCHASE WARRANT (this "AMENDMENT") is dated
as of December 9, 1997, between BROTHERS WARRANT HOLDINGS I, a California
general partnership ("BWH") and BROTHERS GOURMET COFFEES, INC. (the "COMPANY").

                                      RECITALS

     WHEREAS, the Company issued to BWH a common Stock Purchase Warrant dated
December 27, 1996 (as amended, the "WARRANT"), exercisable with respect to up to
400,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock, subject to adjustment as set forth
in the Warrant.  All terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning
given such terms in the Warrant; and

     WHEREAS, the Company and BWH desire to amend the Warrant as set forth
herein.

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, and other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties hereto hereby
agree as follows:

     1.   The Company and BWH hereby agree that the last sentence of the
          preamble of the Warrant shall be amended in its entirety to read as
          follows:

          
          "The exercise price per share of Common Stock for which this Warrant
          is exercisable shall be $1.5625 per share (the "EXERCISE PRICE")."

     2.   The Warrant shall remain in full force and effect as amended hereby
          and all parties hereto hereby ratify and affirm the Warrant as so
          amended.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and BWH have executed this Amendment as of
the date first written above.

                                  BROTHERS WARRANT HOLDINGS I,

                                  a California general partnership
                                  By:
                                     ---------------------------------
                                     Name:
                                     Title:

                                  BROTHERS GOURMET COFFEES, INC.

                                  By:
                                     ---------------------------------
                                     Name:
                                     Title:
#### § 362.3 Application for service.

Any person who desires to receive service under the regulations in this part for poultry or other product eligible therefor under such regulations may make application for service to the Administrator, upon an application form which will be furnished by the Administrator upon request to the Meat and Poultry Inspection Program, Food Safety and Inspection Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC 20250. The application must include all the information called for by that form. In case of change of name, ownership, management, or location, a new application shall be made.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0583-0036)

[41 FR 23715, June 11, 1976, as amended at 47 FR 746, Jan. 7, 1982]
**EXHIBIT 31.1**I, Kimberly A. Springsteen, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Commonwealth Income & Growth Fund I (theregistrant);2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.     **Date:**April 2, 2007 /s/ Kimberly A. Springsteen Kimberly A. Springsteen    Chief Executive Officer  
24
IV

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 573

Expressing the condolences of the House of Representatives on the death

of the Honorable Herbert H. Bateman, a Representative from the Commonwealth of Virginia.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 12, 2000

Mr. BLILEY submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Expressing the condolences of the House of Representatives

on the death of the Honorable Herbert H. Bateman,

a Representative from the Commonwealth of Virginia.

1 Resolved, That the House has heard with profound

2 sorrow of the death of the Honorable Herbert H. Bate3 man, a Representative from the Commonwealth of Vir4 ginia.

5 Resolved, That a committee of such Members of the

6 House as the Speaker may designate, together with such

7 Members of the Senate as may be joined, be appointed

8 to attend the funeral.
2

•HRES 573 ATH

1 Resolved, That the Sergeant at Arms of the House

2 be authorized and directed to take such steps as may be

3 necessary for carrying out the provisions of these resolu4 tions and that the necessary expenses in connection there5 with be paid out of applicable accounts of the House.

6 Resolved, That the Clerk communicate these resolu7 tions to the Senate and transmit a copy thereof to the

8 family of the deceased.

9 Resolved, That when the House adjourns today, it ad10 journ as a further mark of respect to the memory of the

11 deceased.

Æ
# C_2011030EN.01006402.xml

| 29.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/64 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/64

---

Action brought on 20 October 2010 — Stephan Jaeger v Eurofound

(Case F-103/10)

()

2011/C 30/126

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Stephan Jaeger (Dublin, Ireland) (represented by: A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (Eurofound)

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the applicant’s salary adjustment slip for the period from July to December 2009 and the salary slips issued since 1 January 2010 within the framework of the annual adjustment of the remuneration and pensions of officials and other servants pursuant to Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1296/2009 of 23 December 2009.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul, where necessary, the decisions of Eurofound on the establishment of the applicant’s salary adjustment slips for the period from July to December 2009 and his salary slips issued since 1 January 2010; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul, where necessary, the decisions of Eurofound on the establishment of the applicant’s salary adjustment slips for the period from July to December 2009 and his salary slips issued since 1 January 2010;

| — | Order Eurofound to pay the applicant the arrears of remuneration, plus default interest; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order Eurofound to pay the applicant the arrears of remuneration, plus default interest;

| — | Order Eurofound to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order Eurofound to pay the costs.

---
§ 9.11 Agency and legislative liaison. ( a ) The prohibition on the use of appropriated funds, in § 9.1(a), does not apply in the case of a payment of reasonable compensation made to an officer or employee of a person requesting or receiving a Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement if the payment is for agency and legislative liaison activities not directly related to a covered Federal action.
( b ) For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, providing any information specifically requested by an agency or Congress is allowable at any time.
( c ) For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, the following agency and legislative liaison activities are allowable at any time only where they are not related to a specific solicitation for any covered Federal action: ( 1 ) Discussing with an agency (including individual demonstrations) the qualities and characteristics of the person's products or services, conditions or terms of sale, and service capabilities; and
( 2 ) Technical discussions and other activities regarding the application or adaptation of the person's products or services for an agency's use.
( d ) For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, the following agencies and legislative liaison activities are allowable only where they are prior to formal solicitation of any covered Federal action: ( 1 ) Providing any information not specifically requested but necessary for an agency to make an informed decision about initiation of a covered Federal action;
( 2 ) Technical discussions regarding the preparation of an unsolicited proposal prior to its official submission; and
( 3 ) Capability presentations by persons seeking awards from an agency pursuant to the provisions of the Small Business Act, as amended.
( e ) Only those activities expressly authorized by this section are allowable under this section.
### SUBCHAPTER II—PFAS RELEASE DISCLOSURE
'. :**~** ' "'";; ._; L: ij



### In the Matter ofStephen Gunner Gama, Respondent. 

# RECEIVEDAPR 05

## 2013 

# HEARING DOCKET

FAA Docket No.: unassigned FDMS No.: FAA-2012"'0871 FAA Region: Western-Pacific Judge: Richard C. Goodwin
MOTION TOWITHDRAW COMPLAINT To: Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative LawJudge, and Respondent, Stephen Gunner Gama: The Regional Counsel for the Western-Pacific Region, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), through counsel, hereby files this Motion to Withdraw Complaint and seeks dismissal ofthis action with prejudice. This motion is based onthe fact that the parties have settled this matter, and an OrderAssessing Civil Penalty reflecting said settlement will be issued. ·· Respectfully submitted, NAOMI TSUDA Regional Counsel By:

# b'.li~ L·ndsay M. akamura Attorney Dated: March 28, 2013FAA DocketNo.: unassigned FDMS No.: FAA-2012-0871 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Document Title: Motion to Withdraw Complaint I hereby certify that onthis date I sent via United States mail, postage prepaid, the executed original and one copy, as well as one copy by facsimile, ofthe above-referenced document, addressed as follows: Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591 ·Attn: Heating Docket Clerk, AGG-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 Facsimile: (202) 493-5142 I further certify that onthis date I sent viaUnited States mail, postage prepaid, one copy, as well as one copy by facsimile, ofthe above-referenced document, addressed as follows: Hon. Richard C. Goodwin Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Ave., S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590 Facsimile: (202) 366-7536 2

I further certify that onthis date I sent via Certified Mail- Return-Receipt Requested, and United States mail, postage prepaid, one copy ofthe above-referenced document, addressed as follows:

Dated: March 28,2013
Jefferey K: berg Legal Technician Stephen Gunner Gama 1958 Country Club Ct., Apt. A Marysville, CA 95901

Office ofthe Regional Counsel Federal Aviation Administration Lawndale, California 90260
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of FairPoint Communications, Inc. (the "Company") for
the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ajay Sabherwal, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



/s/ AJAY SABHERWAL Ajay Sabherwal Chief Financial Officer


September 29, 2010

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
§ 126.21 Motions. ( a ) *Form of motions.* ( 1 ) A motion filed with a TSOB Review Panel must comply with the requirements set forth in § 126.23(c)(1) through (4).
( 2 ) Motions must be filed with the TSOB Docket Clerk and served on all parties in accordance with § 126.13(b). The TSOB Docket Clerk provides all motions to the TSOB Review Panel.
( b ) *Duty to confer.* Before filing any motion, a party must confer or make reasonable, good-faith efforts to confer with all other parties to resolve the issues that are the subject of the motion. The moving party must state in the motion, or in a certificate attached to the motion, the specific efforts made to comply with this duty to confer. The moving party must also state in the motion the other parties' positions with regard to the relief requested. If no party opposes the relief requested in a motion, the moving party includes “Unopposed” in the motion's title. TSA does not have a duty to confer before filing an ex parte motion, but must provide notice to all parties that it has made an ex parte filing.
( c ) *Motion hearings.* Upon request of any party, or on its own initiative, a TSOB Review Panel may order the parties to appear for a hearing on any motion that was not filed ex parte. Motion hearings may be conducted via communication technology unless all parties agree to appear in person or the TSOB Review Panel in its discretion determines that an in person appearance is necessary for efficient administration of the hearing. The Review Panel considers expense and inconvenience to the parties, the importance of information security, and the quality and reliability of available communication technology when making these determinations.
( d ) *Disposition.* A TSOB Review Panel may, consistent with the requirements of due process and after providing the opposing party with an opportunity to review and respond, grant or deny a motion at any time after it is filed.
( e ) *Additional procedural requirements for motion practice.* A TSOB Review Panel has discretion to establish via order served on the parties, additional procedural requirements regarding motion practice in response to the exigencies of a particular appeal. Such requirements may include, for example, time periods for filing responses and replies, a deadline for concluding all motion practice, and page limitations different from the default 35-page limit established in § 126.23(c)(3). A TSOB Review Panel may not require disclosure of classified information, SSI, or other protected information.
#### § 310.14 Handling of bruised parts.

When only a portion of a carcass is to be condemned on account of slight bruises, either the bruised portion shall be removed immediately and disposed of in accordance with part 314 of this subchapter, or the carcass shall be promptly placed in a retaining room and kept until chilled and the bruised portion shall then be removed and disposed of as provided in part 314 of this subchapter.
Exhibit 20.1



Chase Manhattan Grantor Trust 1995A

From: The Chase Manhattan Bank

To:   Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.


                   MONTHLY CERTIFICATEHOLDER'S REPORT
                   ----------------------------------

Due Period 14 Beginning Date                     10/01/1996
Due Period 14 End Date                           10/31/1996
Determination Date                               11/08/1996
Remittance Date                                  11/15/1996


I.    Monthly Principal and Principal Carryover Shortfall to Certificateholders
      (Per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                  $ 28.8136959711

II.   Monthly Interest and Unpaid Interest to Certificateholders
      (Per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                   $ 2.9055002350

III.  Monthly Expenses Summary

      A. Servicing Fee Disbursement                                $ 726,539.54
      B. Cash Collateral Account Expense                                 $ 0.00
      C. Total Expenses paid
         (per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                $ 0.4842500403

IV.   Cash Collateral Account Deposit Amount                             $ 0.00

V.    Outstanding Advance Summary

      A. From Prior Period                                       $ 3,522,766.13
      B. From Current Period                                     $ 3,638,026.24
      C. Change in Amount Between Periods (Lines B - A)            $ 115,260.11

VI.   Pool Factor Information

      A. Certificate Principal Balance                         $ 828,617,115.29
      B. Initial Certificate Balance                         $ 1,500,339,658.38
      C. Pool Factor (Lines A / B)                               0.552286351068

VII.  Available Cash Collateral Account Information for Due Period

      A. Available Cash Collateral Amount                       $ 43,592,372.30
      B. Available Cash Collateral Amount Percentage            4.999999999656%

VIII. Required Cash Collateral Amount

      A. For the Current Collection Period                      $ 43,592,372.30
      B. For the Next Collection Period                         $ 41,430,855.76