alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1097 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1097

  To offset the spending contained in the fiscal year 1999 emergency 
 supplemental appropriations bill in order to protect the surpluses of 
                    the social security trust funds.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 20, 1999

 Mr. Enzi (for himself, Mr. Hutchinson, Mr. Brownback, Mr. Grams, Mr. 
   Inhofe, Mr. Hagel, Mr. Sessions, and Mr. Santorum) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred jointly pursuant to 
   the order of August 4, 1977, to the Committees on the Budget and 
Governmental Affairs, with instructions that if one committee reports, 
    the other committee have thirty days to report or be discharged

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To offset the spending contained in the fiscal year 1999 emergency 
 supplemental appropriations bill in order to protect the surpluses of 
                    the social security trust funds.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OFFSET OF EMERGENCY SUPPLEMENTAL SPENDING.

    Not later than 15 days after Congress adjourns to end the first 
session of the 106th Congress and on the same day as a sequestration 
(if any) under sections 251 and 252 of the Balanced Budget and 
Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, the Director of the Office of 
Management and Budget shall cause, in the same manner prescribed for 
section 251 of that Act, a sequestration for fiscal year 2000 of all 
non-exempt accounts within the discretionary spending category 
(excluding function 050 (national defense)) to achieve a reduction in 
budget authority equal to $13,303,000,000 minus the dollar amount of 
reimbursements identified in the report required by section 2005 
(efforts to increase burden-sharing) of the 1999 Emergency Supplemental 
Appropriations Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q FOR
THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001063698
<NAME> ALLIANCE LAUNDRY HOLDINGS LLC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           3,282
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,581
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (507)
<INVENTORY>                                     42,319
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                74,896
<PP&E>                                         178,520
<DEPRECIATION>                                (120,825)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 228,807
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           58,984
<BONDS>                                        321,633
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            6,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        62,177
<OTHER-SE>                                    (222,052)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   228,807
<SALES>                                         65,639
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                65,639
<CGS>                                           46,551
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   46,551
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   102
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,640
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,602)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,602)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,602)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1257

To amend statutory damages provisions of title 17, United States Code.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 22, 1999

Mr. HATCH (for himself, Mr. LEAHY, and Mr. SCHUMER) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the

Judiciary

A BILL

To amend statutory damages provisions of title 17, United

States Code.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Digital Theft Deter5 rence and Copyright Damages Improvement Act of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. STATUTORY DAMAGES ENHANCEMENT.

7 Section 504(c) of title 17, United States Code, is

8 amended—

9 (1) in paragraph (1)—
2

•S 1257 IS

1 (A) by striking ‘‘$500’’ and inserting

2 ‘‘$750’’; and

3 (B) by striking ‘‘$20,000’’ and inserting

4 ‘‘$30,000’’; and

5 (2) in paragraph (2)—

6 (A) by inserting ‘‘(A)’’ after ‘‘(2)’’;

7 (B) by striking ‘‘$100,000’’ and inserting

8 ‘‘$150,000’’;

9 (C) by inserting after the second sentence

10 the following:

11 ‘‘(B) In a case where the copyright owner dem12 onstrates that the infringement was part of a re13 peated pattern or practice of willful infringement,

14 the court may increase the award of statutory dam15 ages to a sum of not more than $250,000 per

16 work.’’; and

17 (D) by striking ‘‘The court shall remit

18 statutory damages’’ and inserting the following:

19 ‘‘(C) The court shall remit statutory damages’’.

Æ
### §1455. Procedure for promulgation of regulations

#### (a) Hearings by Secretary of Health and Human Services

Regulations promulgated by the Secretary under section 1453 or 1454 of this title shall be promulgated, and shall be subject to judicial review, pursuant to the provisions of subsections (e), (f), and (g) of section 371 of title 21. Hearings authorized or required for the promulgation of any such regulations by the Secretary shall be conducted by the Secretary or by such officer or employees of the Department of Health and Human Services as he may designate for that purpose.

#### (b) Judicial review; hearings by Federal Trade Commission

Regulations promulgated by the Commission under section 1453 or 1454 of this title shall be promulgated, and shall be subject to judicial review, by proceedings taken in conformity with the provisions of subsections (e), (f), and (g) of section 371 of title 21 in the same manner, and with the same effect, as if such proceedings were taken by the Secretary pursuant to subsection (a) of this section. Hearings authorized or required for the promulgation of any such regulations by the Commission shall be conducted by the Commission or by such officer or employee of the Commission as the Commission may designate for that purpose.

#### (c) Cooperation with other departments and agencies

In carrying into effect the provisions of this chapter, the Secretary and the Commission are authorized to cooperate with any department or agency of the United States, with any State, Commonwealth, or possession of the United States, and with any department, agency, or political subdivision of any such State, Commonwealth, or possession.

#### (d) Returnable or reusable glass containers for beverages

No regulation adopted under this chapter shall preclude the continued use of returnable or reusable glass containers for beverages in inventory or with the trade as of the effective date of this Act, nor shall any regulation under this chapter preclude the orderly disposal of packages in inventory or with the trade as of the effective date of such regulation.

(Pub. L. 89–755, §6, Nov. 3, 1966, 80 Stat. 1299; Pub. L. 96–88, title V, §509(b), Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 695.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The effective date of this Act, referred to in subsec. (d), refers to the effective date of Pub. L. 89–755 which enacted this chapter to take effect July 1, 1967. See Effective Date note set out under section 1451 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Department of Health and Human Services" substituted for "Department of Health, Education, and Welfare" in subsec. (a), pursuant to section 509(b) of Pub. L. 96–88, which is classified to section 3508(b) of Title 20, Education.
§ 332.6 Commencement of a cooperative interstate shipment program; inspection by designated personnel and official mark. ( a ) A cooperative interstate shipment program will commence when the Administrator, in coordination with the State, has selected establishments in the State to participate in the program.
( b ) Inspection services for selected establishments participating in a cooperative interstate shipment program must be provided by designated personnel, who will be under the direct supervision of a State employee.
( c ) Carcasses, parts of carcasses, meat, and meat food products prepared in a selected establishment and inspected and passed by designated State personnel must bear an official Federal mark, stamp, tag, or label of inspection in the appropriate form prescribed in part 312 of this subchapter that includes the information specified in § 332.5(c) of this part.
( d ) Carcasses, parts of carcasses, meat, and meat food products prepared in a selected establishment that comply with the conditions in paragraph (c) of this section may be distributed in interstate commerce.
§ 390.3 Indexes, reference guide, and handbook. ( a ) Pursuant to the regulations in 7 CFR 1.4(c), FSIS will maintain and make available for public inspection and copying an index providing identifying information regarding the materials required to be published or made available under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552(a)(2)). The Agency will make the index available by computer telecommunications by December 31, 1999. Quarterly publication of the index is unnecessary and impractical, since the material is voluminous and does not change often enough to justify the expense of quarterly publication. The Agency will provide copies of any index, upon request, at a cost not to exceed direct cost of duplication.
( b ) FSIS is responsible for preparing reference material or a guide for requesting records or information from the Agency. This guide also will include an index of all major information systems and a description of major information and record locator systems.
( c ) FSIS will prepare a handbook for obtaining information from the Agency. The handbook will be available on paper and through electronic means, and will discuss how the public can use it to access Agency FOIA annual reports. Similarly, the annual reports will refer to the handbook and how to obtain it.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          22,803
<SECURITIES>                                     7,349
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,593
<ALLOWANCES>                                       582
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,243
<PP&E>                                          11,497
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,855
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  50,226
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,205
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     23,136
<COMMON>                                        88,967
<OTHER-SE>                                    (82,877)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    50,226
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,142
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,343
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   700
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,258)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,258)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,258)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.13)
        

</TABLE>
IB

Union Calendar No. 475

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1211

[Report No. 106–814]

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 27, 2000

Referred to the Committee on Resources

SEPTEMBER 6, 2000

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union

and ordered to be printed

AN ACT

To amend the Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Act

to authorize additional measures to carry out the control

of salinity upstream of Imperial Dam in a cost-effective

manner.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT OF THE COLORADO RIVER BASIN

4 SALINITY CONTROL ACT.

5 Section 208(c) of the Colorado River Basin Salinity

6 Control Act (43 U.S.C. 1598(c)) is amended—

7 (1) in the first sentence—
2

•S 1211 RH

1 (A) by striking ‘‘$75,000,000 for sub2 section 202(a)’’ and inserting ‘‘$175,000,000

3 for section 202(a)’’; and

4 (B) by striking ‘‘paragraph 202(a)(6)’’ and

5 inserting ‘‘paragraph (6) of section 202(a)’’;

6 and

7 (2) in the second sentence, by striking ‘‘para8 graph 202(a)(6)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 202(a)(6)’’.

9 SEC. 2. REPORT.

10 The Secretary of the Interior shall prepare a report

11 on the status of implementation of the comprehensive pro12 gram for minimizing salt contributions to the Colorado

13 River from lands administered by the Bureau of Land

14 Management directed by section 203(b)(3) of the Colorado

15 River Basin Salinity Control Act (43 U.S.C. 1593). The

16 report shall provide specific information on individual

17 projects and funding allocation. The report shall be trans18 mitted to the Committee on Energy and Natural Re19 sources and the Committee on Resources of the House of

20 Representatives no later than June 30, 2000.

Passed the Senate November 19, 1999.

Attest: GARY SISCO,

Secretary.
Union Calendar No. 475

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1211

[Report No. 106–814]

AN ACT

To amend the Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Act to authorize additional measures to carry

out the control of salinity upstream of ImperialDam in a cost-effective manner.

SEPTEMBER 6, 2000

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
```
**Exhibit 99.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
I, Richard A. Karp, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Catapult Communications Corporation on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended June 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of Catapult
Communications Corporation.

                                           By:/s/ Richard A. Karp
                                              -------------------
                                           Name:  Richard A. Karp
                                           Title:   Chief Executive Officer

I, Chris Stephenson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Catapult Communications Corporation on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended June 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of Catapult
Communications Corporation.

                                           By:/s/ Chris Stephenson
                                              --------------------
                                           Name: Chris Stephenson
                                           Title:   Chief Financial Officer

                                       21
```
### §1511a. Repealed. Pub. L. 95–219, §3(a)(2), Dec. 28, 1977, 91 Stat. 1613

Section, Pub. L. 94–370, §15(a), July 26, 1976, 90 Stat. 1032, authorized appointment and set forth compensation level for an Associate Administrator for Coastal Zone Management.
# C_2006326EN.01007701.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/77 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/77

---

Action brought on 24 November 2006 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v EEA

(Case T-331/06)

(2006/C 326/157)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (Athens, Greece) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis and N. Keramidas, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Environment Agency

Defendant:

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the EEA to evaluate the applicant's bid as not successful and award the contract to the successful contractor; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the EEA to evaluate the applicant's bid as not successful and award the contract to the successful contractor;

| — | order the EEA to pay the applicant's legal and other costs and expenses incurred in connection with this application, even if the current application is rejected. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the EEA to pay the applicant's legal and other costs and expenses incurred in connection with this application, even if the current application is rejected.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of its claims the applicant argues that in the decision taken in the framework of the tendering procedure EEA/IDS/06/002 for the ‘Provision of IT consultancy services’ (OJ 2006 S 118-125101) communicated to the applicant by letter dated 14 September 2006 the European Environmental Agency (‘EEA’) failed to comply with its obligations foreseen in the Implementing rules and Directive 2004/18/EC as well as the principle of transparency by not disclosing to the participants in advance the weighting of the sub-criteria which were subsequently applied during the selection procedure.

Furthermore, the applicant claims that the EEA committed several manifest errors of assessment which resulted in the rejection of its bid.

The applicant requests that the decision of the EEA to reject its bid and award the contract to three other participants be annulled and that the defendant is ordered by the Court to pay all legal expenses related to the present proceedings even if the application is rejected.

---
Page 1 of2 

Fielder, Phillip 

From: Landers, Stephen (MSK) [STEPHEN.LANDERS@GAPAC.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 4:10 PM 

To: Fielder, Phillip 

Cc: Givens, Dustin (MSK); Aguilar, Mark J. 

Subject: BART EI Comment· GP, Muskogee 

Phillip, 

Below is our response for using the emissions rates that we did. It is short, but 

quite to the pOint. If you need to discuss it, please call at the number below. 

Table 2 of the March 2007 exemption report presents the maximum 24-hr 

actual emissions. These values reflect actual operating history during the baseline 

years evaluated by the Mill. Boiler No.1 is a backup unit and normally runs to 

provide steam when another boiler at the steam plant is off-line. Thus, daily 

operating rates and fuel specifications were tabulated for all BART-eligible boilers 

and a daily emission rate for eachp611utant was calculated. This methodology 

reflects worst case conditions when both BART-eligible units (Boilers 1 and 2) were 

operating simultaneously. The methodology is consistent with the CENRAP 

Protocol, section 6.4.4. 

Regarding inclusion of the Papermachines, Oklahoma DEQ identified BART-eligible 

units in 2006. The federal BART guidelines (Appendix Y to Part 51-Guidelines for 

BART Determinations under the Regional Haze Rule) identify the3 steps to 

determine emission units.that are BART-eligible. Section II of the Guidelines 

state: 

Step 1: Identify the emission units in the BART categories, 

Step 2: Identify the start~up dates of those emission units, and 

Step 3: Compare the potential emissions to the 250 ton/yr cutoff. 

The BART categories include group (3) Kraft pulp mills and (22) Fossil-fuel boilers 

of more than 250 million BTUs per hour heat input. The Muskogee Mill operates 

four emission units in .group 22. Two of these Boilers were put into operation in 

the time period of interest. Regarding BART category 3, the pulp mill and 

papermaking processes at the Mill are not a Kraft process. Therefore, w'e believe 

that all papermaking-related operations are, not included in group 3. The paper 

machines at the Mill are not part of a BART category and thus not BART eligible. 

Steve Landers 

Environmental Program Mgr. 

4/9/2008 
Page 2 of2 

Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products LP 

918-684-4859 

404-231-4189 fax 

4/912008
#### George Ehret, Respondent, *v.*Willard Brown, Appellant. George Ehret, Respondent, v. Charles W. Wells, Appellant.

Appeal from orders entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 18th day of December, 1907, striking out parts of answers as irrelevant.

Per Curiam:

So much of the orders appealed from as requires the caption, of the second separate defense to add the words '‘and not as a counterclaim” should be stricken out. As so modified the orders should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to "the respondent on each appeal. Present — Ingraham, Laughlin, Clarke, Houghton and .Scott, JJ. Orders modified as directed in opinion, and as modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to respondent on each appeal. Settle orders on notice.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR EN BANC RECONSIDERATION

Appellate case name: In re David Lorenza Joyner

Appellate case number: 01-17-00053-CR

Trial court case number: 1446567

Trial court: 351st District Court of Harris County

The en banc court has voted to deny relator’s motion for en banc reconsideration. It is 

ordered that the motion for en banc reconsideration is denied.

En banc court consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings, Keyes, Higley, Bland, 

Massengale, Brown, and Lloyd. 

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jane Bland 

 Acting for the En Banc Court

Date: July 27, 2017