alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2
 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ ROBERT GIAMBRONERobert GiambroneChief Financial Officer 
 *
    
    The foregoing certification is being furnished solely
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed
as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.
# C_2010195EN.01001702.xml

| 17.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 195/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 195/17

---

Order of the General Court of 5 May 2010 — CBI and ABISP v Commission

(Case T-128/08 and Case T-241/08) (1)

1

(State aid - Subsidies granted to public hospitals by the Belgian authorities - Service of general economic interest - Complaint - Alleged decision to take no further action on the complaint - Subsequent adoption of a decision declaring the aid to be compatible with the common market - No need to adjudicate)

2010/C 195/27

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Coordination bruxelloise d’institutions sociales et de santé (CBI) (Brussels, Belgium); and Association bruxelloise des institutions de soins privées (ABISP) (Brussels) (represented by: D. Waelbroeck, lawyer, and D. Slater, Solicitor)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Giolito, J.-P. Keppenne and B. Stromsky, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of an alleged Commission decision, resulting from its letters of 10 January and 10 April 2008, not to initiate the procedure provided for in Article 88(2) EC and to take no further action on the applicants’ complaint concerning alleged State aid granted by the Belgian authorities in connection with the financing of public hospitals of the IRIS network (Interhospitalière régionale des infrastructures de soins) in the Brussels-Capital Region (Belgium).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | Case T-128/08 and Case T-241/08 shall be joined for the purposes of this order. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Case T-128/08 and Case T-241/08 shall be joined for the purposes of this order.

| 2. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on these actions. |
| --- | --- |

2.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on these actions.

| 3. | There is no need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene submitted by Commune de Saint-Gilles (Belgium), Commune d’Etterbeek (Belgium), Commune d’Ixelles (Belgium), Commune d’Anderlecht (Belgium), Brussels-Capital Region (Belgium), City of Brussels (Belgium), or the Republic of Finland. |
| --- | --- |

3.

There is no need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene submitted by Commune de Saint-Gilles (Belgium), Commune d’Etterbeek (Belgium), Commune d’Ixelles (Belgium), Commune d’Anderlecht (Belgium), Brussels-Capital Region (Belgium), City of Brussels (Belgium), or the Republic of Finland.

| 4. | The European Commission shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The European Commission shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 142, 7.6.2008.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-06-1997
<CASH>                                           5,707
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,113
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,298
<INVENTORY>                                     44,197
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                60,321
<PP&E>                                          72,055
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,283
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 159,705
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,510
<BONDS>                                         60,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            48
<OTHER-SE>                                      44,637
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   159,705
<SALES>                                        359,249
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               359,249
<CGS>                                          266,171
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  266,171
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                86,162
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,705
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,789)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,471
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,260)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,260)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.73)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.73)
        


</TABLE>
# C_2011319EN.01001802.xml

| 29.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 319/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 319/18

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 September 2011 — Couture Tech v OHIM (Representation of the Soviet coat of arms)

(Case T-232/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Application for a Community figurative mark representing the Soviet coat of arms - Absolute ground for refusal - Whether contrary to public policy or accepted principles of morality - Article 7(1)(f) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2011/C 319/37

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Couture Tech Ltd (Tortola, British Virgin Islands) (represented by: B. Whyatt, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 5 March 2010 (Case R 1509/2008-2) concerning an application for registration of a figurative sign representing the Soviet coat of arms as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Couture Tech Ltd to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Couture Tech Ltd to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 195, 17.7.2010.

1

---
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Seeks Applications to Improve, Repair or Modify Off-Farm Labor Housing 

Properties

(This announcement was originally posted on Mar. 9, 2022. It was updated on Mar. 25, 2022, to correct the 

application deadline and pre-application deadline outlined in the March 25 correction notice. The * denotes 

new or updated information since the original announcement.)

WASHINGTON, March 25, 2022 – USDA Rural Development Under Secretary Xochitl Torres Small today 

announced the Department is seeking applications to improve or repair off-farm labor housing. These 

improvements will ensure farmworkers continue to have equitable access to safe, affordable places to live. 

Subject to the availability of funds, USDA will provide the loans and grants through the Farm Labor Housing 

Program. Eligible recipients are broad-based nonprofit organizations, nonprofit organizations of farmworkers, 

federally recognized Indian tribes, community organizations, and agencies or political subdivisions of State or 

local governments that currently own a Section 514 Off-Farm Labor Housing property. The funds may be used 

to improve, repair or modify off-farm labor housing properties. 

USDA is offering priority points to projects that advance key priorities under the Biden-Harris Administration 

to help communities recover from the COVID-19 pandemic, advance equity and combat climate change. These 

extra points will increase the likelihood of funding for projects seeking to address these critical challenges in 

rural America.

*The deadline for preapplications is May 9, 2022, 12:00 p.m., EST. Final applications must be submitted by 

Sept. 12, 2022, 12:00 p.m., EST.*

*For additional information, including instructions on how to apply, see page 13374 of the March 9, 2022, 

Federal Register. See corrections to this notice on page 17065 of the March 25, 2022, Federal Register.

If you’d like to subscribe to USDA Rural Development updates, visit our GovDelivery subscriber page.

###

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

The Board of Directors
CCC Information Services Group Inc.

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 33-93544) of
White River Corporation of our report dated January 21, 1998 except as to Note
15 which is as of February 10, 1998, relating to the consolidated financial
statements of CCC Information Services Group Inc. (a subsidiary of White River
Corporation) and its Subsidiaries which report appears on page F-34 of White
River Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
1997.


Price Waterhouse LLP
Chicago, Illinois
April 13, 1998
#### § 156.1 Meaning of words.

Words used in this part in the singular form shall import the plural, and vice versa, as the case may demand.
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Rural Development Announces Curtis Anderson as Acting Administrator of The Rural 

Housing Service

WASHINGTON, Dec. 19, 2017 – Assistant to the Secretary for Rural Development Anne Hazlett today 

announced the appointment of Curtis Anderson as Acting Administrator of Rural Development’s Rural Housing 

Service.

Anderson was appointed as Chief of Staff of USDA Rural Development’s Rural Housing Service on Dec. 4. He 

has more than 25 years of executive experience in rural-mission organizations in both the private and public 

sector. Anderson understands the needs of rural families and has a passion for serving rural communities. Prior 

to being appointed, Anderson worked as a strategic advisor for telecommunications associations and companies, 

specializing in program and legislative issues directly impacting rural communities. Anderson has additional 

experience at Farm Credit and the National Association of State Departments of Agriculture. He previously

served as the Deputy Administrator for USDA Rural Development’s Rural Utilities Service, managing the 

administration of $10 billion in grants and loans annually for rural electrification, telecommunications, and the 

development of water and waste infrastructure.

This leadership change is effective Dec. 18. USDA Rural Development encourages partners and stakeholder 

groups to reach out to Anderson in his new role to build on existing partnerships and facilitate new 

relationships.

#

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
### §2686. Lead hazard information pamphlet

#### (a) Lead hazard information pamphlet

Not later than 2 years after October 28, 1992, after notice and opportunity for comment, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, in consultation with the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development and with the Secretary of Health and Human Services, shall publish, and from time to time revise, a lead hazard information pamphlet to be used in connection with this subchapter and section 4852d of title 42. The pamphlet shall—

(1) contain information regarding the health risks associated with exposure to lead;

(2) provide information on the presence of lead-based paint hazards in federally assisted, federally owned, and target housing;

(3) describe the risks of lead exposure for children under 6 years of age, pregnant women, women of childbearing age, persons involved in home renovation, and others residing in a dwelling with lead-based paint hazards;

(4) describe the risks of renovation in a dwelling with lead-based paint hazards;

(5) provide information on approved methods for evaluating and reducing lead-based paint hazards and their effectiveness in identifying, reducing, eliminating, or preventing exposure to lead-based paint hazards;

(6) advise persons how to obtain a list of contractors certified pursuant to this subchapter in lead-based paint hazard evaluation and reduction in the area in which the pamphlet is to be used;

(7) state that a risk assessment or inspection for lead-based paint is recommended prior to the purchase, lease, or renovation of target housing;

(8) state that certain State and local laws impose additional requirements related to lead-based paint in housing and provide a listing of Federal, State, and local agencies in each State, including address and telephone number, that can provide information about applicable laws and available governmental and private assistance and financing; and

(9) provide such other information about environmental hazards associated with residential real property as the Administrator deems appropriate.

#### (b) Renovation of target housing

Within 2 years after October 28, 1992, the Administrator shall promulgate regulations under this subsection to require each person who performs for compensation a renovation of target housing to provide a lead hazard information pamphlet to the owner and occupant of such housing prior to commencing the renovation.

(Pub. L. 94–469, title IV, §406, as added Pub. L. 102–550, title X, §1021(a), Oct. 28, 1992, 106 Stat. 3920.)
### §2057d. Banning of inclined sleepers for infants

#### (a) In general

Not later than 180 days after May 16, 2022, inclined sleepers for infants, regardless of the date of manufacture, shall be considered a banned hazardous product under section 2057 of this title.

#### (b) Inclined sleeper for infants defined

In this section, the term "inclined sleeper for infants" means a product with an inclined sleep surface greater than ten degrees that is intended, marketed, or designed to provide sleeping accommodations for an infant up to 1 year old.

(Pub. L. 117–126, §2, May 16, 2022, 136 Stat. 1208.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Safe Sleep for Babies Act of 2021, and not as part of the Consumer Product Safety Act which comprises this chapter.
**EXHIBIT
      4**











**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**




We
      hereby consent to the inclusion of our report dated May 17, 2007, relating
      to
      the consolidated balance sheets of FirstService Corporation (the “Company”) as
      at March 31, 2007 and 2006 and the consolidated statements of earnings,
      shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each year in the three-year period ended
      March 31, 2007, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of the Company
      for
      the year ended March 31, 2007.








*/s/
      PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP*


Chartered
      Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants





Toronto,
      Canada


May
      17,
      2007
**Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 July 2011 – Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice Bacău and Administrația Finanțelor
Publice Bacău v Druțu**

**(Case C-438/10)**

Article 104(3), first indent of the Rules of Procedure – Internal taxation – Article 110 TFEU – Pollution tax levied on first registration of motor vehicles

Tax provisions – Internal taxation – Pollution tax levied on motor vehicles on their first registration in national territory (Art. 110 TFEU) (see paras 20-22,
operative part)

**Re:**

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | Reference for a preliminary ruling – Curtea de Appel Bacău Comercială, Contencios Administrativ şi Fiscal – Registration of second-hand vehicles previously registered in other Member States – Environmental tax on motor vehicles on first registration in a Member State – Compatibility of national legislation with Article 110 TFEU – Discrimination in relation to second-hand vehicles already registered in that Member State and not subject to that tax on subsequent sale and new registration. |

**Operative part**

Article 110 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding a Member State from introducing a pollution tax levied on motor vehicles
on their first registration in that Member State if that tax is arranged in such a way as to discourage the putting into circulation
in that Member State of second-hand vehicles purchased in other Member States without discouraging the purchase of second-hand
vehicles of the same age and condition on the domestic market.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                                                          [Arthur Andersen Logo]



                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
report dated April 17, 2001, included in this Form 10-K/A Amendment No 1, into
the Company's previously filed Registration Statement File Nos. 33-90086,
33-90090, 33-90092 and 333-37178 on Form S-8 and Nos. 333-16241, 333-89601,
333-90441 and 333-38508 on Form S-3.



Chicago, Illinois
April 26, 2001
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.13
Form of Allocation Letter
Criteo 2015 Performance-Based Free Share (RSU) Plan 




[Beneficiary Name and Address]                            
[Date]


Letter delivered by electronic delivery


[Name of Beneficiary],


We have the pleasure to inform you that, pursuant to the authorization granted by the shareholders’ meeting held on October 23, 2015, the board of directors (the “Board”) of Criteo S.A. (the “Company”), during its meeting held on [       ] (the “Grant Date”), granted to you free shares of the Company, under the terms and conditions provided for in articles L. 225-197-1 to L. 225-197-5 of the French Commercial Code and in the 2015 Performance-Based Free Share Plan of the Company (the “2015 Performance-Based Plan”).
The Board granted to you [     ] restricted stock units in respect of ordinary shares of the Company (the “Shares”), with a par value of EUR 0.025 each (the “Grant”).
There is a period (named “vesting period”) at the end of which the Grant will become effective and final (i.e., the Shares will be issued to you and be your property). The Shares may be definitively acquired by you not earlier than [        ] unless you shall cease to be an employee of the Criteo group for any reason whatsoever during the vesting period, and subject to the attainment of the following performance goals: [      ]. 
In the event of Disability (as defined under Article 6.4 of the 2015 Performance-Based Plan) before the end of the vesting period, the free Shares shall be definitively acquired on the date of Disability. In the event of death during the vesting period, the free Shares shall be definitively acquired at the date of the request of allocation made by your beneficiaries in the framework of the inheritance. The request for allocation of the Shares shall be made within six (6) months from the date of death in compliance with Article L. 225-197-3 of the French Commercial Code.
By acknowledging this Grant, you hereby acknowledge and agree that any Allocation (as defined in the 2015 Performance-Based Plan) pursuant to the 2015 Performance-Based Plan shall be subject to any applicable Company clawback policy, as adopted by the Company from time to time.
The detailed terms of this Grant are described in the 2015 Performance-Based Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto.
Thank you for sending us a copy of the 2015 Performance-Based Plan to legal.corporate@criteo.com, duly initialed and signed, not later than [        ], failing which the above grant shall be null and void.
    
Yours sincerely,
CRITEO
#### § 72.2 Restrictions on movement of cattle.

Notice is hereby given that the contagious, infectious, and communicable disease known as bovine piroplasmosis, bovine babesiosis, redwater, or splenetic, southern, cattle, Texas or tick fever exists in cattle in portions of the State of Texas and the Virgin Islands of the United States. Notice is also hereby given that ticks which are vectors of said disease exist in the Northern Mariana Islands, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the Island of Guam. Therefore, portions of the State of Texas, the Virgin Islands of the United States, the Northern Mariana Islands, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the Island of Guam are hereby quarantined as provided in §§ 72.3 and 72.5, and the movement of cattle therefrom into any other State or Territory or the District of Columbia shall be made only in accordance with the provisions of this part and part 71 of this chapter.

[43 FR 60864, Dec. 29, 1978, as amended at 78 FR 8960, Feb. 7, 2013]
# C_2007082EN.01005303.xml

| 14.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/53

---

Order of the Court of First Instance of 8 February 2007 — Capitalia, formerly Banca di Roma v Commission

(Case T-40/02) (1)

1

(2007/C 82/111)

Language of the case: Italian

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Fourth Chamber Extended Composition has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 109, 4.5.2002.

1

---
§ 93.506 Declaration and other documents for swine. ( a ) The certificates, declarations, and affidavits required by the regulations in this part shall be presented by the importer or his or her agent to the collector of customs at the port of entry, upon arrival of swine at such port, for the use of the veterinary inspector at the port of entry.
( b ) For all swine offered for importation, the importer or his or her agent shall first present two copies of a declaration which shall list the port of entry, the name and address of the importer, the name and address of the broker, the origin of the swine, the number, breed, species, and purpose of the importation, the name of the person to whom the swine will be delivered, and the location of the place to which such delivery will be made.
( c ) Any declaration, permit, or other document for swine required under this subpart may be issued and presented using a U.S. Government electronic information exchange system or other authorized method.
[55 FR 31495, Aug. 2, 1990, as amended at 81 FR 40151, June 21, 2016]