alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011038EN.01001903.xml

| 5.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/19

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 16 December 2010 — AG v Parliament

(Case F-25/10) (1)

1

(Civil Service - Officials - Dismissal at the end of the probationary period - Manifest inadmissibility - Action brought out of time - Notice by registered letter with acknowledgement of receipt)

2011/C 38/37

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: AG (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Rodrigues and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: S. Seyr and V. Montebello-Demogeot, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Annulment of the decision to dismiss the applicant at the end of the probationary period and compensation for the loss allegedly suffered.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the application as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the application as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | Orders AG to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders AG to pay all the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 161, 19.6.2010, p. 58.

1

---
# C_2010161EN.01005802.xml

| 19.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/58

---

Action brought on 21 April 2010 — Kaskarelis v Commission

(Case F-24/10)

(2010/C 161/94)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Loukas Kaskarelis (Auderghem, Belgium) (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the defendant's decision refusing to grant the applicant an expatriation allowance, an installation allowance and reimbursement of travel expenses.

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the Office for the Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements (PMO) refusing to grant an expatriation allowance, an installation allowance and reimbursement of travel expenses and the decision of the Authority authorised to conclude contracts rejecting the applicant's complaint; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the Office for the Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements (PMO) refusing to grant an expatriation allowance, an installation allowance and reimbursement of travel expenses and the decision of the Authority authorised to conclude contracts rejecting the applicant's complaint;

| — | Order the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the European Commission to pay the costs.

---
### §1141f. Effect of filing a request for extension of protection of an international registration to the United States

#### (a) Requirement for request for extension of protection

A request for extension of protection of an international registration to the United States that the International Bureau transmits to the United States Patent and Trademark Office shall be deemed to be properly filed in the United States if such request, when received by the International Bureau, has attached to it a declaration of bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce that is verified by the applicant for, or holder of, the international registration.

#### (b) Effect of proper filing

Unless extension of protection is refused under section 1141h of this title, the proper filing of the request for extension of protection under subsection (a) shall constitute constructive use of the mark, conferring the same rights as those specified in section 1057(c) of this title, as of the earliest of the following:

(1) The international registration date, if the request for extension of protection was filed in the international application.

(2) The date of recordal of the request for extension of protection, if the request for extension of protection was made after the international registration date.

(3) The date of priority claimed pursuant to section 1141g of this title.

(July 5, 1946, ch. 540, title XII, §66, as added Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title III, §13402, Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1916.)
-  Home 

# Incorporation of Special Permits into HMR

Incorporation of Special Permits into HMR.pdf (43.66 KB)

*DOT is committed to ensuring that information is available in appropriate alternative formats to meet the requirements of persons who have a disability. If you require an alternative version of files provided on this page, please contact          PHMSA-Accessibility@dot.gov.*
Order filed October 24, 2017

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 17

- 00781

- CR

____________ AMBER ORLEAN WILLEMSEN , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 149th District Court Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 79307

- CR



### ORDER
Appellant appeals her conviction for intoxication manslaughter . Appellant filed a notice of appeal on September 28, 2017

. The record was due October 2, 2017. Appellant filed a statement of inability to pay costs in the trial court on May 25, 2017. No contest was filed to appellant’s statement.Accordingly, t he official court reporter for the 149th District Court of

Brazoria County is directed to file the reporter’s record wit hin 30 days of the date
of this order.

PER CURIAM
§ 332.11 Transition to official establishment. ( a ) If an establishment is deselected from a cooperative interstate shipment program as provided in § 332.10 of this part, FSIS, in coordination with the State where the establishment is located, will develop and implement a plan to transition the establishment to become an official establishment. Except that an establishment that was deselected from a cooperative interstate shipment program because it is located in a State whose agreement for such a program was terminated may either transition to become an official establishment or transition to become a State-inspected establishment under the cooperative State meat inspection program.
( b ) An establishment that has been deselected from a cooperative interstate shipment program and successfully transitioned to become an official establishment may withdraw from the Federal inspection program and resume operations under the cooperative State meat inspection program after operating as an official establishment in full compliance with the Act for a year.
### IN THE UNI TED STATES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 10-10988 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. TONY JAY BREEDLOVE, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:10-CR-26-1

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and SMITH and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Tony Jay Breedlove appeals from his conviction of escape. He argues that the evidence was insufficient to support the distri ct court’s finding that he committed the offense of possession of stolen mail while on escape status. The finding that he committed this offense disqualified him from receiving a fourlevel downward adjustment to his offense level pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2P1.1(b)(3), which applies to defendants who escape f r o m h a l fway houses or similar facilities. Within his sufficiency argument, he also contends that the U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D June30 , 20 11 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 , the cour t hasd ete rm inedt hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-10988 Document: 00511525769 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/30/2011No. 10-10988

Government violated Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) by arguing that his prior stolen mail conviction was relevant to the issue whether he committed a stolen mail offense while on escape status. Breedlove did not raise his Rule 404(b) argument in the district court; our review therefore is for plain error. See United States v. Williams , 620 F.3d 483, 488-89 (5th Cir. 2010), cert. denied, 131 S. Ct. 1534 (2011). Rule 404(b) does not apply to sentencing proceedings. See F E D
. R. E VI D
. 1101(d)(3) (stating that the Federal Rules of Evidence do not apply at sentencing). Breedlove cannot show error as to Rule 404(b), plain or otherwise. We “review[] de novo the di s t ri ct court’s guidelines interpretations and review[] for clear error the district court’s findings of fact.” United States v. Le, 512 F.3d 128, 134 (5th Cir. 2007). The district court makes factual findings at sentencing under the preponderance of the evidence standard. United States v. Mares, 402 F.3d 511, 519 (5th Cir. 2005). The facts as set out in the record were
s u fficient for the district court to find by a preponderance of the evid e n c e th a t Breedlove knowingly possessed stolen mail inside a bag that was in his car when he was arrested. On the facts found by the district court, Breedlove committed the federal felony offense of possession of stolen mail while on escape status. See 18 U.S.C. § 1708. The district court did not e rr b y d e nying Breedlove a downward adjustment pursuant to § 2P1.1(b)(3). AFFIRMED

.

2 Case: 10-10988 Document: 00511525769 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/30/2011
#### §§ 317.346-317.353 [Reserved]
Together, America Prospers

Pilot Program: Single Family Housing Repair Loans 

and Grants in Presidentially Declared Disasters

What does this 

program do?

The USDA Rural Development 

Home Repair Loans and Grants 

in Presidentially Declared 

Disasters Pilot Program 

provides loans and grants to 

very-low-income homeowners 

to help repair disaster-related 

damage to their homes. 

Who can apply?

To qualify:

• Your home must have been

damaged in an incident

resulting in a Presidentially

declared disaster on or after

July 18, 2022

• You must be the homeowner

and be able to occupy the

house within 12 months from

the start of repairs

• Your eligible household

income cannot exceed the

very-low limit for the county

in which your property

is located. You will find a

nationwide map and list of

income limits at this link:

tinyurl.com/mt7pmj

How can funds be used?

• Loans and grants can be used to help

repair homes damaged in incidents

that resulted in Presidentially declared

disasters on or after July 18, 2022.

• In certain circumstances, costs

incurred prior to your application are

eligible if the purpose of the expense

was to repair disaster-related damage.

• You also can use funds to move

a manufactured home onto your

property.

What is an eligible rural area?

You can find out whether your property 

is located in an eligible rural area by 

searching the map or entering your 

address under the “Property Eligibility” 

tab of the USDA Eligibility Site, available 

at this link: tinyurl.com/rb4j8k9z. 

How much funding is available? 

• The maximum loan is $40,000

• The maximum grant is $42,920

• Loans and grants can be combined

for up to $82,920 in assistance

How do I get started? 

A USDA home loan specialist in your 

area can help you with your application. 

A list of offices is available at this link: 

tinyurl.com/5yuf24mx.

What are some of the loan or grant 

terms? 

• The loan term is 20 years at

1 percent interest, fixed

• Grants have a lifetime limit of

$42,920, and must be repaid if your

property is sold less than three

years from the date of the grant

award

Is there a deadline to apply?

Applications are accepted year-round 

through your local RD office. Approval 

times depend on funding availability 

in your area. A USDA home loan 

specialist in your area can help you 

with your application. A list of state 

offices is available at this link: 

tinyurl.com/5yuf24mx.

What governs this program? 

• The Housing Act of 1949 (as

amended): 7 CFR Part 3550,

available at this link:

tinyurl.com/4wf85sp7

• USDA Rural Development Single

Family Housing Direct Loans and

Grants Field Office Handbook

(HB-1-3550) – available at this link:

tinyurl.com/s6rc2456 – PDF

NOTE: Because information changes, always consult official program instructions 

or contact your local Rural Development office for help. A list is available at this link: 

go.usa.gov/xJHPE. You will find additional resources, forms, and program information at 

rd.usda.gov. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Last updated March 2024
### §247b. Appearances before Congress

The Vice Chairman for Supervision shall appear before the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives and at semi-annual hearings regarding the efforts, activities, objectives, and plans of the Board with respect to the conduct of supervision and regulation of depository institution holding companies and other financial firms supervised by the Board.

(Dec. 23, 1913, ch. 6, §10(12), as added Pub. L. 111–203, title XI, §1108(b), July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 2126.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is comprised of par. (12) of section 10 of act Dec. 23, 1913. No par. between pars. (10) and (12) has been enacted. For classification to this title of other pars. of section 10, see Codification note set out under section 241 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 1 day after July 21, 2010, except as otherwise provided, see section 4 of Pub. L. 111–203, set out as a note under section 5301 of this title.
§ 166.15 State status. ( a ) The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) will maintain on its website2 the following lists of States: ( 1 ) States that prohibit the feeding of garbage to swine;
( 2 ) States that allow the feeding of treated garbage to swine;
( 3 ) States that have primary enforcement responsibility under the Act; and
( 4 ) States that issue licenses under cooperative agreements with APHIS, but do not have primary responsibility under the Act.
( b ) For information concerning the feeding of garbage to swine, the public may contact the APHIS Area Veterinarian in Charge, the State animal health official, or Veterinary Services, 4700 River Road, Unit 37, Riverdale, MD 20737-1231.[2]
84 FR 64415, Nov. 22, 2019] Footnotes -
166.15
[2] *https://www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/animalhealth/animal-disease-information/swine-disease-information .*
Exhibit 10.1

                          COLUMBUS MCKINNON CORPORATION
                         MONTHLY RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLAN

                  AMENDMENT NO. 8 OF THE 1998 PLAN RESTATEMENT


     Columbus  McKinnon  Corporation (the "Company")  hereby amends the Columbus
McKinnon  Corporation  Monthly Retirement Benefit Plan (the "Plan"),  as amended
and restated in its entirety  effective April 1, 1998, and as further amended by
Amendment Nos. 1through 8, as permitted under Section 10.1 of the Plan, in order
to comply with Section  101(b)(4) of the Pension  Funding Equity Act of 2004, as
follows:


1.   Section 11.2, entitled "Maximum Annual Benefit", is amended effective April
1, 2004 by adding new Section 11.2(e) to read as follows:

     "(E)  ADJUSTMENT  FOR CERTAIN OTHER FORMS OF BENEFIT.  NOTWITHSTANDING  ANY
           ----------------------------------------------
OTHER  PROVISION IN THE PLAN, IF THE ANNUAL BENEFIT IS PAYABLE UNDER THE PLAN IN
A FORM  OTHER THAN A SINGLE  LIFE  ANNUITY  (WITH NO  ANCILLARY  BENEFITS),  THE
APPLICATION  OF THE LIMITS IN SECTION  11.2(A)  SHALL BE MADE BY  ADJUSTING  THE
BENEFIT SO THAT IT IS THE  EQUIVALENT OF A SINGLE LIFE ANNUITY  (WITH  ANCILLARY
BENEFITS)  AS  PROVIDED  IN CODE  SECTION  415(B)(2)(A).  WITHOUT  LIMITING  THE
GENERALITY OF THE PRECEDING SENTENCE, IN THE CASE OF A BENEFIT PAYABLE IN A FORM
SUBJECT TO CODE SECTION  417(E) (E.G.,  A LUMP SUM  PAYMENT),  THE INTEREST RATE
SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN THE GREATER OF THE APPLICABLE  INTEREST RATE DESCRIBED IN
SECTION 1.4 OR ANY OTHER RATE SPECIFIED IN THE PLAN PROVIDED,  HOWEVER,  THAT IN
THE CASE OF PLAN YEARS  BEGINNING IN 2004 AND 2005,  THE INTEREST RATE SHALL NOT
BE LESS THAN THE GREATER OF 5.5% OR ANY OTHER RATE SPECIFIED IN THE PLAN."

     IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  this  instrument  of amendment has been executed by a
duly authorize officer of the Corporation this 22nd day of December, 2006, to be
effective as of the dates recited herein.


                                           COLUMBUS McKINNON CORPORATION

                                           By     /S/ Timothy R. Harvey
                                                  ---------------------

                                           Title: Secretary
                                                  ---------------------
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1258

To authorize funds for the payment of salaries and expenses of the Patent

and Trademark Office, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 22, 1999

Mr. HATCH (for himself and Mr. LEAHY) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To authorize funds for the payment of salaries and expenses

of the Patent and Trademark Office, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Patent Fee Integrity

5 and Innovation Protection Act of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

7 There are authorized to be made available for the

8 payment of salaries and necessary expenses of the Patent

9 and Trademark Office in fiscal year 2000, $116,000,000

10 from fees collected in fiscal year 1999 and such fees as
2

•S 1258 IS

1 are collected in fiscal year 2000 pursuant to title 35,

2 United States Code, and the Trademark Act of 1946 (15

3 U.S.C. 1051 et seq.), except that the Commissioner is not

4 authorized to charge and collect fees to cover the accrued

5 indirect personnel costs associated with post-retirement

6 health and life insurance of officers and employees of the

7 Patent and Trademark Office other than those charged

8 and collected pursuant to title 35, United States Code,

9 and the Trademark Act of 1946.

10 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

11 This Act shall take effect on October 1, 1999.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1413 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1413

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the deduction 
        from the estate tax for family-owned business interests.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 22, 1999

Mr. Durbin (for himself and Mr. Dorgan) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the deduction 
        from the estate tax for family-owned business interests.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN ESTATE TAX DEDUCTION FOR FAMILY-OWNED BUSINESS 
              INTEREST.

    (a) In General.--Section 2057(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 (relating to maximum deduction) is amended by striking 
``$675,000'' and inserting ``$1,975,000''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Section 2057(a)(3)(B) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to coordination with unified credit) is 
amended by striking ``$675,000'' each place it appears in the text and 
heading and inserting ``$1,975,000''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to estates of decedents dying after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
### §2276. Access to and examination by Comptroller General of books, documents, etc., of farm credit system banks and institutions

On and after December 19, 1985, the Comptroller General or his duly authorized representatives shall have access to and the right to examine all books, documents, papers, records, or other recorded information within the possession or control of the Federal land banks and Federal land bank associations, Federal intermediate credit banks and production credit associations and banks for cooperatives.

(Pub. L. 99–190, §107, Dec. 19, 1985, 99 Stat. 1316.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Farm Credit Act of 1971 which comprises this chapter.
Exhibit 20.1
                                                       ------------

Chase Manhattan Grantor Trust 1995-A


From: The Chase Manhattan Bank

To:   Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.


                   MONTHLY CERTIFICATEHOLDER'S REPORT
                   ----------------------------------

Due Period 22 Beginning Date                     06/01/1997
Due Period 22 End Date                           06/30/1997
Determination Date                               07/10/1997
Remittance Date                                  07/15/1997


I.    Monthly Principal and Principal Carryover Shortfall to Certificateholders
      (Per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                  $ 22.6972493794

II.   Monthly Interest and Unpaid Interest to Certificateholders
      (Per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                   $ 1.8999591953

III.  Monthly Expenses Summary

      A. Servicing Fee Disbursement                                $ 475,097.35
      B. Cash Collateral Account Expense                                 $ 0.00
      C. Total Expenses paid
         (per $1000 of Original Principal Amount)                $ 0.3166598625

IV.   Cash Collateral Account Deposit Amount                             $ 0.00

V.    Outstanding Advance Summary

      A. From Prior Period                                       $ 4,044,597.27
      B. From Current Period                                     $ 3,906,524.42
      C. Change in Amount Between Periods (Lines B - A)           $ -138,072.85

VI.   Pool Factor Information

      A. Certificate Principal Balance                         $ 536,063,242.28
      B. Initial Certificate Balance                         $ 1,500,339,658.38
      C. Pool Factor (Lines A / B)                               0.357294589452

VII.  Available Cash Collateral Account Information for Due Period

      A. Available Cash Collateral Amount                       $ 28,505,841.28
      B. Available Cash Collateral Amount Percentage            4.999999999474%

VIII. Required Cash Collateral Amount

      A. For the Current Collection Period                      $ 28,505,841.28
      B. For the Next Collection Period                         $ 26,803,162.11