alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Vital Images, Inc.**

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350**

In connection withthis Annual Report on Form 10-K of Vital Images, Inc. (the “Company”)for the period ended December 31, 2006 (the “Annual Report”), I, MichaelH. Carrel, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

1.               The Annual Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));and

2.               The informationcontained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  | March 15, 2007 |   | /s/ Michael H. Carrel       |   |   |
|--------|---------------------|--------|-----------------------------|--------|--------|
|   |                |   | Michael H. Carrel           |   |   |
|   |                |   | Chief Operating Officer and |   |   |
|   |                |   | Chief Financial  Officer    |   |   |
|   |                |   | Vital  Images, Inc.    |   |   |

 

 

1

----
### SUBCHAPTER IV—DEFINITIONS

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §108(c)(5), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4210, inserted subchapter IV designation and heading.
§ 381.155 General. ( a ) *Authorization to establish specifications.* ( 1 ) The Administrator is authorized to establish specifications or definitions and standards of identity or composition, covering the principal constituents of any poultry product with respect to which a specified name of the product or other labeling terminology may be used, whenever he determines such action is necessary to prevent sale of the product under false or misleading labeling. Further, the Administrator is authorized to prescribe definitions and standards of identity or composition for poultry products whenever he determines such action is otherwise necessary for the protection of the public. The requirements of this subpart are hereby found to be necessary for these purposes and standards are hereby established as set forth in this subpart.
( 2 ) Where cooked poultry meat is specified in this subpart as an ingredient of poultry products, this means poultry meat derived from poultry processed, cooked, and cooled in a manner approved by the Administrator in specific cases without use of liquid or moisture in direct contact with the poultry meat following the cooking and cooling of the poultry.
( 3 ) If, following cooking and cooling of poultry meat to be used in poultry products, liquid or moisture is used in direct contact with such poultry meat and the percentage of solids, excluding salt, in the poultry meat is found to be below 34 percent when such poultry meat is tested by acceptable methods, the percentage of poultry meat required by this section for any poultry product shall be increased in proportion to the deficiency, or the meat shall be so processed as to raise the solids content, excluding salt, to 34 percent. The official establishment shall furnish adequate facilities for such testing.
( b ) Any binder or antimicrobial agent that has been found to be safe and suitable by the Food and Drug Administration and the Food Safety and Inspection Service may be used in the production of poultry products with standards of identity in this part, where the product standards and applicable Federal regulations already permit the use of these types of ingredients.
[37 FR 9706, May 16, 1972, as amended at 68 FR 22578, Apr. 29, 2003]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             685
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,112
<ALLOWANCES>                                       541
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                49,483
<PP&E>                                         236,999
<DEPRECIATION>                                  60,947
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 233,980
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,231
<BONDS>                                        176,488
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           46,034
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (22,773)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   233,980
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               194,654
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  148,013
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                28,076
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,190
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,460
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,460
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,460
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of James Minally, Respondent, v Joan B. Carey, as Deputy Chief Administrative Judge for the New York City Courts, Appellant.

[825 NYS2d 133]

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of Joan B. Carey, Deputy Chief Administrative Judge for the New York City Courts, dated January 6, 2005, which terminated the petitioner’s employment as a senior court officer in the Unified Court System, Joan B. Carey appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Martin, J.), dated August 3, 2005, as granted that branch of the petition which was for a name-clearing hearing.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, that branch of the petition which was for a name-clearing hearing is denied, the determination is confirmed, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits.

The parties’ stipulations of settlement of a specification of misconduct provided that the petitioner was subject to random testing for controlled substances “the results of [which] shall be deemed conclusive upon the parties.” Pursuant to the terms of the stipulations, the petitioner was not entitled to a name-clearing hearing to challenge the results of a random test which was positive for a controlled substance *(see Matter of Ramsey v City of New York,*8 AD3d 392 [2004]). Adams, J.P., Rivera, Skelos and Lifson, JJ., concur.
### SUBCHAPTER III—CYBERSECURITY AWARENESS AND PREPAREDNESS

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

This subchapter was comprised of title IV of Pub. L. 113–274, Dec. 18, 2014, 128 Stat. 2985, prior to its repeal by Pub. L. 116–283, div. H, title XCIV, §9401(g)(2), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4809.
exv10w4






Exhibit 10.4




LIST OF SIGNATORIES TO INDEMNITY AGREEMENT




     The following is a list of the executive officers and directors of IXYS Corporation who are
signatories to the form of Indemnity Agreement attached to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2008 as Exhibit 10.3:



Donald L. Feucht

Peter H. Ingram

Samuel Kory

S. Joon Lee

Timothy A. Richardson


Uzi Sasson

James M. Thorburn

Nathan Zommer
Exhibit 11
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                            WEST ESSEX BANCORP, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE



                                                                       Three Months Ended
                                                                            March 31,
                                                             ---------------------------------------
                                                                     2000                 1999
                                                             ------------------   ------------------
<S>                                                                  <C>                  <C>
Net income                                                           $ 879,936            $ 751,579

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding                 3,859,029            4,066,089

Common stock equivalents due to dilutive effect
 of potential common shares                                                 --                   --

Total weighted average number of common shares
 and common share equivalents outstanding                            3,859,029            4,066,089

Basic earnings per common share                                         $ 0.23               $ 0.18

Diluted earnings per common share                                       $ 0.23               $ 0.18
</TABLE>
Exhibit 31(a)
                                CERTIFICATIONS
                                --------------
I, Dale M. Hendrick, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Unitronix Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

(c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):

(a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual
report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: September 20, 2004                       /s/Dale M. Hendrick
                                                  ----------------
                                                  Dale M. Hendrick
                                                  President and
                                                  Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

SPECIALTY MORTGAGE TRUST, INC.
STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
EXHIBIT 11

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                           THREE MONTHS        THREE MONTHS          SIX MONTHS        SIX MONTHS
                                                               ENDED               ENDED               ENDED              ENDED
                                                           JUNE 30, 2001       JUNE 30, 2000       JUNE 30, 2001      JUNE 30, 2000
                                                            (UNAUDITED)         (UNAUDITED)         (UNAUDITED)        (UNAUDITED)
                                                           -------------       -------------       -------------      -------------
<S>                                                        <C>                 <C>                 <C>                <C>
Basic

   Average Common Shares Outstanding                           339,761             320,200             337,754            320,200
   Net Earnings Attributable to Common Stock                  (132,231)           (114,308)          1,173,169            768,465
   Per Share Amount                                              (0.39)              (0.36)               3.47               2.40

Diluted

   Average Common Shares Outstanding                           339,761             320,200             337,754            320,200
   Net effect of conversion of preferred shares
     outstanding during the period                           4,711,952           3,863,072           4,691,419          3,863,254
   Net effect of dilutive stock options outstanding
     during the period - based on the treasury
     stock method                                               43,339              78,356              52,375             78,356
     Total                                                   5,095,112           4,261,628           5,081,548          4,261,810
   Net Income                                                1,269,290           1,034,739           2,574,690          1,918,512
   Per Share Amount                                                .25                 .24                 .51                .45
</TABLE>

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements



                                       19
# C_2007095EN.01000901.xml

| 28.4.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 1 March 2007 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany)) — Jan de Nul NV v Hauptzollamt Oldenburg

(Case C-391/05) (1)

1

(Excise duties - Exemption from excise duty on mineral oils - Directive 92/81/EEC - ‘Navigation within Community waters’)

(2007/C 95/14)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Jan de Nul NV

Applicant:

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Oldenburg

Defendant:

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Finanzgericht Hamburg — Interpretation of the first subparagraph of Article 8(1)(c) of Council Directive 92/81/EEC of 19 October 1992 on the harmonisation of the structures of excise duties on mineral oils (OJ 1992 L 316, p. 12) — Definition of ‘Community waters ’and ‘navigation ’— Taxation of mineral oils used as fuel for a floating dredger carrying out cleaning work on the Elbe.

Operative part of the judgment

| 1) | The term ‘Community waters ’within the meaning of the first subparagraph of Article 8(1)(c) of Council Directive 92/81/EEC of 19 October 1992 on the harmonisation of the structures of excise duties on mineral oils, as amended by Council Directive 94/74/EC of 22 December 1994, relates to all waters which can be used by all sea-going vessels, including those which have the greatest capacity, capable of travelling maritime waterways for commercial purposes. |
| --- | --- |

1)

The term ‘Community waters ’within the meaning of the first subparagraph of Article 8(1)(c) of Council Directive 92/81/EEC of 19 October 1992 on the harmonisation of the structures of excise duties on mineral oils, as amended by Council Directive 94/74/EC of 22 December 1994, relates to all waters which can be used by all sea-going vessels, including those which have the greatest capacity, capable of travelling maritime waterways for commercial purposes.

| 2) | Manoeuvres carried out by a hopper dredger during its operations of pumping and discharge of materials, that is to say, journeys inherent in the carrying out of dredging activities, come within the scope of the term ‘navigation ’as used in the first subparagraph of Article 8(1)(c) of Directive 92/81, as amended by Directive 94/74. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Manoeuvres carried out by a hopper dredger during its operations of pumping and discharge of materials, that is to say, journeys inherent in the carrying out of dredging activities, come within the scope of the term ‘navigation ’as used in the first subparagraph of Article 8(1)(c) of Directive 92/81, as amended by Directive 94/74.

---

(1)  OJ C 10, 14.1.2006.

1

---
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS ON
                          FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE



To the Board of Directors of
   Asante Technologies, Inc.

Our audits of the financial  statements  referred to in our report dated October
24, 1997,  appearing in this Form 10-K also  included an audit of the  Financial
Statement  Schedule listed in Item 14(a) of this Form 10-K. In our opinion,  the
Financial  Statement  Schedule  presents fairly, in all material  respects,  the
information  set  forth  therein  when  read in  conjunction  with  the  related
financial statements.


PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP

San Jose, California
October 24, 1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS RESTATED SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
DECEMBER 31, 1995 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       3,948,147
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    118,865
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,115,382
<PP&E>                                         161,978
<DEPRECIATION>                                  45,910
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,277,360
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          266,421
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      8,911
<COMMON>                                         3,163
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,998,865
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,277,360
<SALES>                                         68,047
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                68,047
<CGS>                                          141,312
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  141,312
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,669,639
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,496,958)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,496,958)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,496,958)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.80)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.80)<F1>
<FN>
<F1>RESTATED TO REFLECT THE ADOPTION OF STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
NO. 128 AND SEC STAFF ACCOUNTING BULLETIN NO. 98.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Seeks Applications for Loans and Grants to Help Rural Microenterprises

WASHINGTON, Aug. 31, 2022 – United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Rural Development (RD) 

Under Secretary Xochitl Torres Small today announced that the Department is accepting applications for loan 

and grants to help rural microenterprises connect to new markets and create prosperity.

The funding is being provided through USDA’s Rural Microentrepreneur Assistance Program (RMAP).

RMAP provides loans and grants to a non-profit entity, tribe or institution of higher education as 

a Microenterprise Development Organization (MDO) to establish revolving loan funds to provide loans to 

rural microloan borrowers and micro entrepreneurs. Additionally, the funds may be used to provide training and 

technical assistance to microentrepreneurs. To be eligible for a loan from an MDO, an ultimate recipient must 

be a business with 10 or fewer full-time employees and be located in a non-metropolitan rural area with a 

population of 50,000 or less.

The Department is soliciting applications prior to the passage of a Fiscal Year (FY) 2023 Appropriations Act, 

which may or may not provide funding for RMAP, to allow applicants sufficient time to leverage financing, 

prepare and submit their applications, and give the agency time to process applications within FY 2023. 

USDA is offering priority points to projects that advance key priorities under the Biden-Harris Administration: 

• Reduce climate pollution and increase resilience to the impacts of climate change through economic 

support to rural communities;

• Ensure all rural residents have equitable access to RD programs and benefits from RD-funded projects; 

and

• Assist rural communities recover economically through more and better market opportunities and 

through improved infrastructure.

These extra points will increase the likelihood of funding for projects that will advance these key priorities in 

rural places.

Applications must be submitted to the USDA Rural Development State Office where the project is located no 

later than 4:30 p.m. local time on the following dates:

• First Quarter: Sept. 30, 2022. 

• Second Quarter: Dec. 31, 2022. 

• Third Quarter: March 31, 2023.

• Fourth Quarter: June 30, 2023

Interested applicants are encouraged to contact their local USDA Rural Development State Office well in 

advance of the application deadline to ask questions about their project, the program or the application process.

Additional information is available on page 53448 of the Aug 31, 2022, Federal Register. 

If you’d like to subscribe to USDA Rural Development updates, visit our GovDelivery subscriber page.
###

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
#### § 78.42 Quarantined areas.

None.