alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS RESTATED SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
DECEMBER 31, 1996 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      18,588,583
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  420,984
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    251,788
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,645,778
<PP&E>                                         423,158
<DEPRECIATION>                                 124,738
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,229,454
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          499,721
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,215
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,719,523
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,229,459
<SALES>                                        841,942
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               866,942
<CGS>                                          884,229
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  884,229
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,524,416
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,034,879)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,034,879)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,034,879)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.66)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.66)<F1>
<FN>
<F1>RESTATED TO REFLECT THE ADOPTION OF STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
NO. 128 AND SEC STAFF ACCOUNTING BULLETIN NO. 98.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 Written Statement of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002
  (a)
    
    the Form 10-Q Report of the Company for the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 filed on
the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(b)
    
    information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ John A. StoneJohn A. StoneChief Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in (i) Registration Statement No.
33-73900 of Roberds, Inc. on Form S-8, (ii) Registration Statement No. 33-81086
of Roberds, Inc. on Form S-8, (iii) Registration Statement No. 33-79182 of
Roberds, Inc. on Form S-8, (iv) Registration Statement No. 33-97262, of Roberds,
Inc. on Form S-8, and (v) Registration Statement No. 333-19903 of Roberds, Inc.
on Form S-8 of our report dated February 27, 1997 appearing in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Roberds, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1996.



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Dayton, Ohio
February 27, 1997


                                       122
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

MICHELLE KHETARPAL , n/k/a MICHELLE BOOTH, Appellant,

v.

SUNIL KHETARPAL, REX & REX LIMITED, INC., a Florida corporation, and KHETARPAL HOLDINGS, LLC , Appellee s

.

No. 4D 16

- 2757

[ January 10, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Howard K. Coates Jr. , Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2014

- DR

001826

- XXXX

- NB

.
Jeanne C. Brady and Frank R. Brady of Brady & Brady, P.A., Boca Raton, for appell ant.

John T. Christiansen Jr. of Law Offices of John T. Christiansen, P.L., West Palm Beach, for appellees.

P ER C URIAM

.
The wife appeals a final judgment of dissolution of marriage, challenging the trial court’s determination of marital assets, denial of permanent alimony, interpretation of the prenuptial agreement, and valuation date for marital assets. We find the issues raised to be without merit and affirm without discussion. However, we reverse and remand for the limited purpose of resolving a conflict in the judgment

, which found the wife needed $5,200 per month in bridge

- the

- gap alimony but awarded $3,964.42 per month in bridge

- the

- gap alimony.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded

.

G ERBER , C.J

., L EVINE , J. and S ING HAL , R AAG , Associate Judge, concur.

* * *2 Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# C_2012138EN.01003904.xml

| 12.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/39

---

Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 15 February 2011 — Capidis v Commission

(Case F-18/10) (1)

(2012/C 138/94)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 134, 22.5.2010, p. 56.

---
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Elisha Linville, Appellant

No. 06

- 16

- 00055

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 66th District Court of Hill County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 39,010 ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the judgment

of the court below. Therefore, we modify the trial court’s judgment by deleting the entry under

the “Terms of Plea Bargain” section. As modified, we affirm the judgment.

We note that the appellant, Elisha Linville, has adequately indicated his inability to pay

costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive p ayment of costs.

RENDERED AUGUST 18, 2016

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
STAKEHOLDER ANNOUNCEMENT

USDA Seeks Applications to Improve Rural Transportation Systems Opening the 

Door to Economic Opportunities for People Living in Rural Communities

WASHINGTON, Jan. 14, 2022 – U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Under Secretary for Rural 

Development Xochitl Torres Small today announced that USDA is accepting applications to enhance the 

operation of rural transportation systems. These investments in rural transportation build opportunity and 

prosperity for the people who live in rural communities by connecting them to economic resources they may not 

otherwise be able to access.

The grants are part of the Rural Business Development Grant program. Eligible applicants are qualified national 

organizations seeking to provide rural communities with training and technical assistance to improve passenger 

transportation services and facilities. USDA does not provide funding directly to individuals under this 

program. 

USDA is offering priority points to projects that advance key priorities under the Biden-Harris Administration 

to help communities recover from the COVID-19 pandemic, advance equity and combat climate change. These 

extra points will increase the likelihood of funding for projects seeking to address these critical challenges in 

rural America.

Applications will be scored, reviewed, and selected on a competitive basis. Applications must be submitted to 

the applicant’s nearest USDA office by April 14, 2022, at 4:30 p.m. local time. Additional information is 

available on page 2406 of the Jan 14, 2022, Federal Register. 

If you would like to subscribe to receive USDA Rural Development updates, visit our GovDelivery subscriber 

page. 

###

USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT MARCH 31, 2000 (UNAUDITED) AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 (UNAUDITED).
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          17,197
<SECURITIES>                                   129,685
<RECEIVABLES>                                   79,732
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0<F1>
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               246,043
<PP&E>                                          10,205
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F2>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 306,572
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          170,225
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        14,052
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,621
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   306,572
<SALES>                                        203,417
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               205,553
<CGS>                                          207,841
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  207,841
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   139
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F3>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,487
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,914)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,348)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,566)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,566)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.15)
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDED IN #13 (RECEIVABLES)
<F2>INCLUDED IN #17 (PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT)
<F3>INCLUDED IN #29 (CGS)
</FN>


</TABLE>
§ 416.4 Sanitary operations. ( a ) All food-contact surfaces, including food-contact surfaces of utensils and equipment, must be cleaned and sanitized as frequently as necessary to prevent the creation of insanitary conditions and the adulteration of product.
( b ) Non-food-contact surfaces of facilities, equipment, and utensils used in the operation of the establishment must be cleaned and sanitized as frequently as necessary to prevent the creation of insanitary conditions and the adulteration of product.
( c ) Cleaning compounds, sanitizing agents, processing aids, and other chemicals used by an establishment must be safe and effective under the conditions of use. Such chemicals must be used, handled, and stored in a manner that will not adulterate product or create insanitary conditions. Documentation substantiating the safety of a chemical's use in a food processing environment must be available to FSIS inspection program employees for review.
( d ) Product must be protected from adulteration during processing, handling, storage, loading, and unloading at and during transportation from official establishments.
[64 FR 56417, Oct. 20, 1999]
# C_2006294EN.01006001.xml

| 2.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/60

---

Action brought on 9 October 2006 — Omnicare v OHIM — Yamanouchi Pharma (OMNICARE)

(Case T-277/06)

(2006/C 294/120)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Omnicare Inc. (Covington, USA) (represented by: M. Edenborough, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Defendant

Other party before the Board of Appeal: Yamanouchi Pharma GmbH (Heidelberg, Germany)

Other party before the Board of Appeal:

Form of order sought

| — | The appeal by the appellant to the Court of First Instance be allowed; |
| --- | --- |

—

The appeal by the appellant to the Court of First Instance be allowed;

| — | the decision of the Second Board of Appeal case No R0446/2006-2 be annulled in its entirety; |
| --- | --- |

—

the decision of the Second Board of Appeal case No R0446/2006-2 be annulled in its entirety;

| — | the application for restitutio in integrum be remitted to the Board of Appeal for reconsideration; and |
| --- | --- |

—

the application for restitutio in integrum be remitted to the Board of Appeal for reconsideration; and

restitutio in integrum

| — | the Office pays to the appellant the costs incurred by it in connection with this appeal before the Court of First Instance. |
| --- | --- |

—

the Office pays to the appellant the costs incurred by it in connection with this appeal before the Court of First Instance.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘OMNICARE’ for goods and services in classes 16 and 42 — application No 284 067

Community trade mark concerned:

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Yamanouchi Pharma GmbH

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:

Mark or sign cited: National figurative mark ‘OMNICARE’ for services in classes 35, 41 and 42

Mark or sign cited:

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld in its entirety

Decision of the Opposition Division:

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Refusal of the application for restitutio in integrum and declaration that the appeal was deemed not to have been filed

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

restitutio in integrum

Pleas in law: Misinterpretation of Article 78(5) of Council Regulation No 40/94 in finding that an application for restitutio in integrum cannot be made if the subject matter of the said application concerns the failure to comply with the time limit set out in Article 59 of the regulation.

Pleas in law:

restitutio in integrum

---
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32

     ServiceWare Technologies, Inc. Certification under Section 906 of the
       Sarbanes/Oxley Act - filed as an exhibit to 10-Q for Quarter Ended
                               September 30, 2004

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ServiceWare Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Kent Heyman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Scott
Schwartzman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:

            1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
            13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
            all material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company.

/s/ Kent Heyman                           /s/ Scott Schwartzman

Kent Heyman                               Scott Schwartzman
Principal Executive Officer               Principal Financial Officer
November 8, 2004                            November 8, 2004

                                       29
§ 44.106 How can the Secretary revoke an eligibility determination? ( a ) In order to revoke eligibility, the Secretary must: ( 1 ) Provide the tribe or tribal organization with a written notice;
( 2 ) Furnish the tribe or tribal organization with technical assistance to take remedial action; and
( 3 ) Provide an appeal process.
( b ) The Secretary cannot revoke an eligibility determination if the tribe or tribal organization is in compliance with 25 U.S.C. 2505(c).
( c ) The Secretary can take corrective action if the school fails to be accredited by January 8, 2005.
( d ) In order to revoke eligibility for a grant, the Secretary must send the tribe or tribal organization a written notice that: ( 1 ) States the specific deficiencies that are the basis of the revocation or reassumption; and
( 2 ) Explains what actions the tribe or tribal organization must take to remedy the deficiencies.
( e ) The tribe or tribal organization may appeal a notice of revocation or reassumption by requesting a hearing under 25 CFR part 900, subpart L or P.
( f ) After revoking eligibility, the Secretary will either contract the program under 25 U.S.C. 450 *et seq.* or operate the program directly.
tr_Ex10-13


		
			Exhibit 10.13
		

		
			 
		

		
			TOOTSIE ROLL INDUSTRIES, INC.
		

		
			CAREER ACHIEVEMENT PLAN
		

		
			AMENDMENT 2015-1
		

		
			Pursuant to the authority of Section  9(f)(1) of the Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. Career Achievement Plan (the “Plan”) and the Board of Directors’ Resolutions dated November 4, 2015, the Plan is hereby amended effective as of the execution date of this Amendment 2015-1 (the “Effective Date”) as follows:
		

		
			1.         The second sentence of Section 9(f)(1) is hereby deleted and the phrase “pursuant to the preceding sentence” in the third sentence of Section 9(f)(1) is hereby replaced with “pursuant to Section 9(f)(2) below”.
		

		
			2.         Section 9(1) of the Plan is amended to add the following paragraphs at the end thereof:
		

		
			“All references to “termination of employment” and correlative phrases for purposes of the Plan shall be construed to require a “separation from service” (as defined in Section 1.409A-1(h) of the Treasury regulations after giving effect to the presumptions contained therein).  Notwithstanding other provision of the Plan to the contrary, if a participant is a “specified employee”, then no payment or benefit under the Plan that is payable on account of the participant’s termination of employment, shall be made before the date that is the later of (i) eighteen months from the Effective Date; and (ii) six months after the participant’s termination of employment; provided, however, that payment shall be made as provided in Section 5 above in the case of death.  Any payment or benefit delayed by reason of the prior sentence shall be paid out or provided in a single lump sum at the end of such required delay period in order to catch up to the original payment schedule.”
		

			
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						TOOTSIE ROLL INDUSTRIES, INC.

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						By:

					
					
						/s/ Ellen R. Gordon

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						Date:

					
					
						November 4, 2015

					
					
						 

					
					
						Title:

					
					
						Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						By:

					
					
						/s/ G. Howard Ember, Jr.

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						Date:

					
					
						November 4, 2015

					
					
						 

					
					
						Title:

					
					
						Vice President/Finance and Chief Financial Officer
§ 354.140 Forms of inspection certificates. Each inspection certificate issued pursuant to the regulations in this part shall be approved by the Administrator as to form, and: ( a ) Each rabbit inspection certificate shall show the class or classes of rabbits, the quantity of product contained in the respective lot, and all pertinent information concerning the condition and wholesomeness thereof;
( b ) Each food product inspection certificate shall show the names of the edible products covered by such certificate, the quantity of each such product, such shipping marks as are necessary to identify such products, and all pertinent information concerning the condition and wholesomeness thereof;
( c ) Each export certificate shall show the respective names of the exporter and the consignee, the destination, the shipping marks, the numbers of the export stamps attached to the edible products to be exported and covered by the certificate, and the names of such products and the total net weight thereof.
### §2505. Limitations on retirement and retired pay

(a) The provisions of any section of this title shall not be construed so as to prevent any member from being placed on the retired list with the highest grade or rate and the highest retired pay to which the member may be entitled under the provisions of any other section of this title or under any other law.

(b) In no case may the retired pay of a member exceed 75 percent of (1) the sum of the active-duty pay and all permanent additions thereto (including longevity credit to which the member is entitled) of the grade or rate on which the member's pay is computed, or (2) the retired pay base determined under section 1407 of title 10, as appropriate.

(Aug. 4, 1949, ch. 393, 63 Stat. 525, §424; Pub. L. 98–557, §15(a)(3)(A), Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 2865; Pub. L. 99–348, title II, §205(b)(11), July 1, 1986, 100 Stat. 700; renumbered §2505, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, §114(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4223.)

#### Historical and Revision Notes

The two provisions of this section are considered desirable as safeguards to eliminate any possible misconstruction of situations relating to retirement and retired pay in respect to the two points covered. 81st Congress, House Report No. 557.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 424 of this title as this section.

1986—Pub. L. 99–348 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section read as follows: "The provisions of any section of this title shall not be construed so as to prevent any officer or enlisted member from being placed on the retired list with the highest grade or rating and the highest retired pay to which such officer or enlisted member may be entitled under the provisions of any other section of this title or under the provisions of any other law. In no case shall the retired pay of an officer or enlisted member exceed 75 percent of the sum of the active-duty pay and all permanent additions thereto, including longevity credit to which the officer or enlisted member concerned is entitled, of the grade or rating on which his pay is computed."

1984—Pub. L. 98–557 substituted reference to enlisted member for reference to enlisted man in four places.