alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011055EN.01003603.xml

| 19.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/36

---

Action brought on 29 September 2010 — Florentiny v Parliament

(Case F-90/10)

2011/C 55/67

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Jean-François Florentiny (Strassen, Luxembourg) (represented by: P. Nielsen Grade and G. Leblanc, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision not to include the applicant in the list of officials promoted to grade AST6 in the 2009 promotion procedure.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of the appointing authority of 29 June 2010 rejecting the applicant's complaint; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the appointing authority of 29 June 2010 rejecting the applicant's complaint;

| — | Annul the decision of the appointing authority of 24 November 2009, published on 2 December 2009, not to include the applicant in the list of officials promoted to grade AST6 in the 2009 promotion procedure; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the appointing authority of 24 November 2009, published on 2 December 2009, not to include the applicant in the list of officials promoted to grade AST6 in the 2009 promotion procedure;

| — | Indicate to the appointing authority the effects of the annulment of the contested decisions, in particular, classification in grade AST6, and that the promotion to grade AST6 must be backdated to the date on which it should have taken effect, namely 1 January 2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Indicate to the appointing authority the effects of the annulment of the contested decisions, in particular, classification in grade AST6, and that the promotion to grade AST6 must be backdated to the date on which it should have taken effect, namely 1 January 2009;

| — | Award the applicant EUR 2 000 as compensation for the non-material damage suffered; |
| --- | --- |

—

Award the applicant EUR 2 000 as compensation for the non-material damage suffered;

| — | Order the European Parliament to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the European Parliament to pay the costs.

---
§ 318.5 Requirements concerning procedures. ( a ) ( 1 ) Care shall be taken to assure that product is not adulterated when placed in freezers. If there is doubt as to the soundness of any frozen product, the inspector will require the defrosting and reinspection of a sufficient quantity thereof to determine its actual condition.
( 2 ) Frozen product may be defrosted in water or pickle in a manner and with the use of facilities which are acceptable to the inspector. Before such product is defrosted, a careful examination shall be made to determine its condition. If necessary, this examination shall include defrosting of representative samples by means other than in water or pickle.
( b ) Product, such as pork tenderloins, brains, sweetbreads, stew, or chop suey, shall not be packed in hermetically sealed metal or glass containers, unless subsequently heat processed or otherwise treated to preserve the product in a manner approved by the Administrator in specific cases.
( c ) Care shall be taken to remove bones and parts of bones from product which is intended for chopping.
( d ) Heads for use in the preparation of meat food products shall be split and the bodies of the teeth, the turbinated and ethmoid bones, ear tubes, and horn butts removed, and the heads then thoroughly cleaned.
( e ) Kidneys for use in the preparation of meat food products shall first be freely sectioned and then thoroughly soaked and washed. All detached kidneys, including beef kidneys with detached kidney fat, shall be inspected before being used in or shipped from the official establishment.
( f ) Cattle paunches and hog stomachs for use in the preparation of meat food products shall be thoroughly cleaned on all surfaces and parts immediately after being emptied of their contents, which shall follow promptly their removal from the carcasses.
( g ) Clotted blood shall be removed from hog hearts before they are shipped from the official establishment or used in the preparation of meat food products.
( h ) Beef rounds, beef bungs, beef middles, beef bladders, calf rounds, hog bungs, hog middles, and hog stomachs which are to be used as containers of any meat food product shall be presented for inspection, turned with the fat surface exposed.
( i ) Portions of casings which show infection with Oesophagostomum or other nodule-producing parasite, and weasands infected with the larvae of Hypoderma lineatum, shall be rejected, except that when the infestation is slight and the nodules and larvae are removed, the casing or weasand may be passed.
[35 FR 15586, Oct. 3, 1970; 36 FR 11903, June 23, 1971]
Filed 2/20/ 24 P. v. S.E. CA2/5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions

not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b ). This opinion

has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

THE PEOPLE

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

S.E.

,

De fendant and Appellant. B330149

(Los Angeles County

Super. Ct. No.

SJ0011A

)

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los

Angeles County, Susan Ser

, Judge . Affirmed.

Sarah M. Javaheri

, under appointment by the Court of

A ppeal , for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance by Respondent.2 After a contested jurisdictional hearing, the juvenile court

sustained a wardship petition against then

- minor S.E. pursuant

to Welfare and Institutions Co de section 602, subdivision (a). In

an order dated May 17, 2023, t he court found true beyond a

reasonable doubt the a llegation that S.E . committed

misdemeanor assault by means of force likely to produce great

bodily injury. (Pen. Code, § 2 45

, subd. (a)(4).) The court placed

S.E. home on probation and ordered certain terms and conditions

of probation.

S.E . timely appealed the findings and order of the court

. We appointed counsel. After reviewing the record, counsel filed

an opening brief asking this court to review the record

independ ently pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436,

441 ( Wende ). On January 10 , 202 4 , we advised S.E . that s he had

30 days to submit any contentions or issues s he wished us to

consider. No response has been received to date.

We have examined the enti re record. We are satisfied no

arguable issues exist and that S.E .’s counsel has fully satisfied

her responsibilities under Wende

. ( Smith v. Robbins (2000) 528

U.S. 259, 279

– 284; Wende

, supra , 25 Cal.3d at p. 441.)3 DISPOSITION

The juvenile court’s Ma y 17, 2023 order is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

.

MOOR , J

.

W E CONCUR :

BAKER, Acting P. J

.

LEE , J. 

 Judge of the San Bernardino Superior Court, assigned by

the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the

California Cons titution.
### §1526. Receipts for work or services; deposit in special accounts; availability for payment of costs, repayment or advances to appropriations or funds, refunds, credits to working capital funds; appropriation limitation of annual expenditures from accounts

All payments for work or services performed or to be performed under this Act shall be deposited in a separate account or accounts which may be used to pay directly the costs of such work or services, to repay or make advances to appropriations or funds which do or will initially bear all or part of such costs, or to refund excess sums when necessary: Provided, That said receipts may be credited to a working capital fund otherwise established by law, and used under the law governing said funds, if the fund is available for use by the agency of the Department of Commerce which is responsible for performing the work or services for which payment is received. Acts appropriating funds to the Department of Commerce may include provisions limiting annual expenditure from said account or accounts.

(Pub. L. 91–412, §2, Sept. 25, 1970, 84 Stat. 864.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, means Pub. L. 91–412, which enacted sections 1525 to 1527, amended section 1153, and repealed sections 189, 189a, 192, 192a, 1153a, and 1520 of this title.
# C_2013108EN.01002002.xml

| 13.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/20

---

Judgment of the General Court of 26 February 2013 — Spain v Commission

(Case T-65/10) (1)

1

(ERDF - Reduction of financial assistance - Operational Programmes for ‘Andalusia’ and ‘Comunidad Valenciana’ Objective 1 (1994-1999) - Operational Programme for ‘Basque Country’ Objective 2 (1997-1999) - Extrapolation)

2013/C 108/54

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: initially by J. Rodríguez Cárcamo, and subsequently by A. Rubio González, abogados del Estado)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Steiblytė and J. Baquero Cruz, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decisions C(2009) 9270 of 30 November 2009, C(2009) 10678 of 23 December 2009 and C(2010) 337 of 28 January 2010 reducing the aid from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) granted under, respectively, the operational programme ‘Andalusia’ Objective 1 (1994-1999) under Commission Decision C(94) 3456 of 9 December 1994, the operational programme ‘Basque Country’ Objective 2 (1997-1999) under Commission Decision C(1998) 121 of 5 February 1998, and the operational programme ‘Comunidad Valenciana’ Objective 1 (1994-1999) under Commission Decision C(1994) 3043/6 of 25 November 1994

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 100, 17.4.2010.

1

---
English Translation of Security Agreement



 English Translation 
 Exhibit 4.77 
 Security Agreement 
 Contract No.: RZ20080004 
 Execution Date: May 16, 2008 
 Execution Plan: Jiangning, Nanjing 
 This agreement is entered
into in Nanjing, PRC by and between the following parties: 
 Party A: China Electric Equipment Group Co., Ltd. 
 Party B: China Sunergy (Nanjing) Co., Ltd. 
 Through friendly
consultation between both parties, Party A agrees that Party A will provide security for Party B for its bank credit up to RMB 1 billion with the term from May 17, 2008 to May 16, 2010. Party A will provide such security to Party B free of
charge. In the event Party A’s credit capacity or operation status is materially changed, both parties will otherwise negotiate whether to change the total amount of the security or not. 
 This agreement shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the People’s Republic of China. 
 This agreement is made in two original counterparts, with each party holding one, and shall take into effect upon the execution and seal by the
authorized representatives of each party. 
  

					
	Party A: China Electric Equipment Group Co., Ltd. (Seal)	  		  	Party B: China Sunergy (Nanjing) Co., Ltd.
			
	Authorized Representative (Signature):	  		  	Authorized Representative (Signature):
			
	 /s/ Lu Tingxiu
	  		  	 /s/ Lu Tingxiu

	Date:	  		  	Date:
Nicole Berg

of

Washington 

Nicole Berg, a farm industry appointee who also grows specialty crops, is partner and Chief Financial 

Officer of Lenzie Ranch, Inc./Berg Farms, LLC/The Berg Partnership, growing wheat, bluegrass seed, 

green peas, sweet corn, field corn, alfalfa, beans, and dry peas. Nicole holds and has held numerous 

leadership positions. She currently serves as Vice President of the National Association of Wheat 

Growers and as a Board Member of the Community First Bank. Nicole has been a crop insurance 

customer for about 23 years.
# C_2012109EN.01001002.xml

| 14.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 109/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 109/10

---

Judgment of the General Court of 29 February 2012 — Azienda Agricola Colsaliz di Faganello Antonio v OHIM — Weinkellerei Lenz Moser (SERVO SUO)

(Case T-525/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark SERVO SUO - Earlier Community word mark SERVUS - Relative grounds for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2012/C 109/22

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Azienda Agricola Colsaliz di Faganello Antonio (Refrontolo, Italy) (represented by: G. Massa and P. Massa, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: initially G. Mannucci and subsequently P. Bullock, Agents)

Defendant:

The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Weinkellerei Lenz Moser AG (Linz, Austira) (represented by: C.-R. Haarmann, lawyer)

The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 16 August 2010 (Case R 1571/2009-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Weinkellerei Lenz Moser AG and Azienda Agricola Colsaliz di Faganello Antonio.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Azienda Agricola Colsaliz di Faganello Antonio to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Azienda Agricola Colsaliz di Faganello Antonio to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 13, 15.1.2011.

1

---
# C_2012065EN.01001301.xml

| 3.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 65/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 65/13

---

Judgment of the General Court of 24 January 2012 — El Corte Inglés v OHIM — Ruan (B)

(Case T-593/10) (1)

1

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark containing the letter ‘B’ - Earlier Community figurative mark containing the letter ‘B’ - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2012/C 65/24

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: El Corte Inglés (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J.L. Rivas Zurdo and E. Seijo Veiguela, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carillo, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Jian Min Ruan (Mem Martins, Portugal)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 October 2010 (Case R 576/2010-2) relating to opposition proceedings between El Corte Inglés and Jian Min Ruan.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Orders El Corte Inglès, SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders El Corte Inglès, SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 80, 12.3.2011.

1

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1250,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with thequarterly report of Power3 Medical Products, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSBfor the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven B. Rash, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

The Report fully compileswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  | November 14,  2005 | /s/ Steven B.  Rash                   |   |
|--------|-------------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                    | Steven B. Rash                        |
|   |                    | Chairman and  Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                    | Power3 Medical  Products, Inc.   |

 

1

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of WNC Housing Tax
Credit Fund IV, L.P., Series 1 (the  "Partnership") for the year ended March 31,
2004 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof
(the "Report"),  and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  I,  Wilfred N.  Cooper,  Jr.,
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner
of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  result  of
               operations of the Partnership.



/s/WILFRED N. COOPER, JR.
-------------------------
Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
July 14, 2004
```

[110th Congress Public Law 10]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ010.110]

[[Page 121 STAT. 65]]

Public Law 110-10
110th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
16150 Aviation Loop Drive in Brooksville, Florida, as the ``Sergeant Lea 
Robert Mills Brooksville Aviation Branch Post Office''. <<NOTE: Mar. 7, 
                          2007 -  [H.R. 514]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SERGEANT LEA ROBERT MILLS BROOKSVILLE AVIATION BRANCH 
                              POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 16150 Aviation Loop Drive in Brooksville, Florida, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Sergeant Lea Robert Mills Brooksville 
Aviation Branch Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sergeant 
Lea Robert Mills Brooksville Aviation Branch Post Office''.

    Approved March 7, 2007.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 514:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 153 (2007):
            Feb. 5, considered and passed House.
            Feb. 17, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
### §2695a. Model guidelines for siting of school facilities

Not later than 18 months after December 19, 2007, the Administrator, in consultation with the Secretary of Education and the Secretary of Health and Human Services, shall issue voluntary school site selection guidelines that account for—

(1) the special vulnerability of children to hazardous substances or pollution exposures in any case in which the potential for contamination at a potential school site exists;

(2) modes of transportation available to students and staff;

(3) the efficient use of energy; and

(4) the potential use of a school at the site as an emergency shelter.

(Pub. L. 94–469, title V, §502, as added Pub. L. 110–140, title IV, §461(a), Dec. 19, 2007, 121 Stat. 1640.)
§ 590.930 Egg products offered for entry, retention in customs custody; delivery under bond; movement prior to inspection; handling; equipment and assistance. ( a ) No egg products required by this subpart to be inspected will be released from customs custody prior to required inspections, but such product may be delivered to the importer, or his agent, prior to inspection, if the importer furnishes a bond, in a form prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury, on the condition that the product must be returned, if demanded, to the collector of the port where the product was offered for clearance through customs.
( b ) Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section, no product required by this subpart to be inspected will be moved prior to inspection from the port of arrival where first unloaded, and if arriving by water from the wharf where first unloaded at such port, to any place other than the place designated in accordance with this part as the place where the product must be inspected; and no product will be conveyed in any manner other than in compliance with this subpart.
( c ) The importer, or his agent, must furnish such equipment and must provide such assistance for handling and inspecting, where applicable, egg products offered for entry as the program inspector may require.
( d ) Official import inspection establishments must provide buildings and equipment that meet the sanitation requirements contained in part 416 of this chapter.
### §15d. Measurement of damages

In any action under section 15c(a)(1) of this title, in which there has been a determination that a defendant agreed to fix prices in violation of sections 1 to 7 of this title, damages may be proved and assessed in the aggregate by statistical or sampling methods, by the computation of illegal overcharges, or by such other reasonable system of estimating aggregate damages as the court in its discretion may permit without the necessity of separately proving the individual claim of, or amount of damage to, persons on whose behalf the suit was brought.

(Oct. 15, 1914, ch. 323, §4D, as added Pub. L. 94–435, title III, §301, Sept. 30, 1976, 90 Stat. 1395.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Injuries sustained prior to Sept. 30, 1976, not covered by this section, see section 304 of Pub. L. 94–435, set out as a note under section 15c of this title.