alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2127. Guaranty fund subscriptions in lieu of stock

If any cooperative association is not authorized under the laws of the State in which it is organized to take and hold stock in a bank for cooperatives, the bank shall, in lieu of any requirement for stock purchase, require the association to pay into or have on deposit in a guaranty fund, or the bank may retain out of the amount of the loan and credit to the guaranty fund account of the borrower, a sum equal to the amount of stock which the association would otherwise be required to own. Each reference to stock of the banks for cooperatives in this chapter shall include such guaranty fund equivalents. The holder of the guaranty fund equivalent and the bank shall each be entitled to the same rights and obligations with respect thereto as the rights and obligations associated with the class or classes of stock involved.

(Pub. L. 92–181, title III, §3.6, Dec. 10, 1971, 85 Stat. 604.)
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent, <br><br>against<br><br>Jonathan Wong, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Barbara F. Newman, J.H.O.), rendered May 2, 2018, convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of violating Public Health Law ยง 229, and imposing sentence.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (Barbara F. Newman, J.H.O.), rendered May 2, 2018, reversed, on the law, accusatory instrument dismissed, and fine, if paid, remitted.</p><p>The record fails to establish that defendant understood the nature of the offense to which he was pleading, and that his plea was knowing, intelligent and voluntary (<i>see</i> People v Conceicao, 26 NY3d 375, 383-85 [2015]). Given the relatively minor nature of the infraction here charged, we dismiss the accusatory instrument (see People v Burwell, 53 NY2d 849, 851 [1981]).</p><br>We note that the People have declined to submit a respondent's brief on this appeal.<p>In view of our disposition, we reach no other issue.</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur <br>Decision Date: March 23, 2020<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
Certification Pursuant to Sections 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002

Pursuant  to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b)  of  Section  1350, Chapter 63 or Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned  officers  of  Proteo,  Inc. (the "Company") does hereby certify, to
such  officer's  knowledge,  that:

The  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the three month period ended March 31,
2004  of  the  Company  fully  complies,  in  all  material  respects,  with the
requirements  of  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 or other
document  authentications,  acknowledging,  or  otherwise adopting the signature
that  appears  in  typed  form  within  the  electronic  version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided by Proteo, Inc. and will be
retained by Proteo, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or  its  staff  upon  request.

                                   /s/ Oliver Wiedow
                                   Oliver Wiedow
                                   Chief  Executive  Officer
                                   Chief  Financial  Officer

May 14, 2004
§ 56.6 Presentation of claims for indemnity and/or compensation. Claims for the following must be documented on a form furnished by APHIS and presented to an APHIS employee or the State representative authorized to accept the claims: ( a ) Indemnity for the value of poultry to be destroyed due to infection with or exposure to H5/H7 LPAI;
( b ) Indemnity for the value of eggs to be destroyed due to infection or exposure to H5/H7 LPAI; and
( c ) Compensation for the cost of cleaning and disinfection (virus elimination) of premises, conveyances, and materials that came into contact with poultry infected with or exposed to H5/H7 LPAI, or, in the case of materials, if the cost of cleaning and disinfection (virus elimination) would exceed the value of the materials or cleaning and disinfection (virus elimination) would be impracticable for any reason, the cost of destruction and disposal for the materials.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0007) [71 FR 56323, Sept. 26, 2006, as amended at 75 FR 10657, Mar. 9, 2010; 85 FR 62564, Oct. 5, 2020]
§ 590.430 Limitation on entry of material. ( a ) The Administrator shall limit the entry of eggs and egg products and other materials into official plants under such conditions as he may prescribe to assure that allowing the entry of such articles will be consistent with the purposes of the Act and these regulations.
( b ) Inedible egg products may be brought into an official plant for storage, processing, and reshipment provided they are handled in such a manner that adequate segregation and inventory controls are maintained at all times. The processing of inedible egg products must be done under conditions that will not affect the processing of edible products, such as processing in separate areas or at times when no edible products are being processed. If the same equipment or areas are used to process both inedible and edible eggs, then the equipment and processing areas used to process inedible eggs must be thoroughly cleaned and sanitized prior to processing any edible egg products.
[36 FR 9814, May 28, 1971, as amended at 40 FR 20059, May 8, 1975. Redesignated at 42 FR 32514, June 27, 1977, and further redesignated at 46 FR 63203, Dec. 31, 1981, as amended at 85 FR 68679, Oct. 29, 2020]
COMAR 26.11.19.08B Incorporation by Reference

Cover Sheet

AAMA 2604-05 Voluntary Specification, Performance Requirements and Test 

Procedures for High Performance Organic Coatings on Aluminum Extrusions and Panels.

AAMA 2605-05 Voluntary Specification, Performance Requirements and Test 

Procedures for Superior Performing Organic Coatings on Aluminum Extrusions and 

Panels.

The Notice of Proposed Action was published in the Maryland Register on November 15, 

2013. A public hearing was held on December 18, 2013. The action was adopted on 

April 29, 2014. The Notice of Final Action was published on May 16, 2014 and the 

action became effective on May 26, 2014. All required administrative procedures were 

followed throughout the adoption process.
§ 320.6 Information and reports required from official establishment operators. ( a ) The operator of each official establishment shall furnish to Program employees accurate information as to all matters needed by them for making their daily reports of the amount of products prepared or handled in the departments of the establishment to which they are assigned and such reports concerning sanitation, mandatory microbiological testing, and other aspects of the operations of the establishment and the conduct of inspection, as may be required by the Administrator in special cases.
( b ) The operator of each official establishment shall report quarterly the number of pounds of meat and meat food product produced at that establishment. The report shall be made on a form furnished by the Administrator and shall be submitted to an inspector at the establishment. Each report shall cover a calendar quarter and shall be filed within 15 days after the end of each quarter.
( c ) The operator of each official establishment shall also make such other reports as the Administrator may from time to time require under the Act.
[35 FR 15603, Oct. 3, 1970, as amended at 45 FR 76968, Nov. 21, 1980; 61 FR 38866, July 25, 1996]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Inverted Paradigms Corporation (the
Company), for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stewart York, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify, to my knowledge that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 780(d)); and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ Stewart York       
|Stewart York           
|Chief Executive Officer

Dated: May 15, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Inverted Paradigms Corporation and will be retained by Inverted Paradigms
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2006331EN.01002001.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/20

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 December 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-127/06) (1)

1

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2002/65/EC - Distance marketing of financial services - Failure to transpose within the period prescribed)

(2006/C 331/34)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: A. Aresu, acting as Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (represented by: S. Schreiner, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to adopt, within the period prescribed, the provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2002 concerning the distance marketing of consumer financial services and amending Council Directive 90/619/EEC and Directives 97/7/EC and 98/27/EC (OJ 2002 L 271, p. 16)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the period prescribed, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2002 concerning the distance marketing of consumer financial services and amending Council Directive 90/619/EEC and Directives 97/7/EC and 98/27/EC, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 21(1) of that directive; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the period prescribed, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2002 concerning the distance marketing of consumer financial services and amending Council Directive 90/619/EEC and Directives 97/7/EC and 98/27/EC, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 21(1) of that directive;

| 2. | Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 108, 6.5.2006.

1

---
§ 9034.10 Pre-candidacy payments by multicandidate political committees deemed in-kind contributions and qualified campaign expenses; effect of reimbursement. ( a ) A payment by a multicandidate political committee is an in-kind contribution to, and qualified campaign expense by, a Presidential candidate, even though made before the individual becomes a candidate under 11 CFR 100.3 and 9032.2, if— ( 1 ) The expenditure is made on or after January 1 of the year immediately following the last Presidential election year;
( 2 ) With respect to the goods or services involved, the candidate accepted or received them, requested or suggested their provision, was materially involved in the decision to provide them, or was involved in substantial discussions about their provision; and
( 3 ) The goods or services are— ( i ) Polling expenses for determining the favorability, name recognition, or relative support level of the candidate involved;
( ii ) Compensation paid to employees, consultants, or vendors for services rendered in connection with establishing and staffing offices in States where Presidential primaries, caucuses, or preference polls are to be held, other than offices in the candidate's home state and in or near the District of Columbia;
( iii ) Administrative expenses, including rent, utilities, office supplies and equipment, in connection with establishing and staffing offices in States where Presidential primaries, caucuses, or preference polls are to be held, other than offices in the candidate's home state and in or near the District of Columbia; or
( iv ) Expenses of individuals seeking to become delegates in the Presidential nomination process.
( b ) Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section, if the candidate, through an authorized committee, reimburses the multicandidate political committee within 30 days of becoming a candidate, the payment shall not be deemed an in-kind contribution for either entity, and the reimbursement shall be an expenditure and a qualified campaign expense of the candidate.
[68 FR 47419, Aug. 8, 2003]
# C_2015221EN.01001502.xml

| 6.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/15

---

Order of the General Court of 12 May 2015 — Stichting Woonlinie and Others v Commission

(Case T-202/10 RENV) (1)

1

((State aid - Social housing - Scheme of aid granted to housing corporations - Existing aid - Decision accepting Member State’s commitments - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2015/C 221/21)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Stichting Woonlinie (Woudrichem, Netherlands); Stichting Allee Wonen (Roosendaal, Netherlands); Woningstichting Volksbelang (Wijk bij Duurstede, Netherlands); Stichting WoonInvest (Leidschendam-Voorburg, Netherlands); Stichting Woonstede (Ede, Netherlands) (represented initially by P. Glazener and E. Henny and subsequently by P. Glazener, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P.-J. Loewenthal and S. Noë, Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the applicants: Kingdom of Belgium (represented initially by T. Materne and J.-C. Halleux and subsequently by J.-C. Halleux, Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicants

Intervener in support of the defendant: Vereniging van Institutionele Beleggers in Vastgoed, Nederland (IVBN) (Voorburg, Netherlands) (represented by: M. Meulenbelt, lawyer)

Intervener in support of the defendant

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 9963 final of 15 December 2009 relating to State aid E 2/2005 and N 642/2009 — Netherlands — Existing and special project aid to housing corporations.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Orders Stichting Woonlinie, Stichting Allee Wonen, Woningstichting Volksbelang, Stichting WoonInvest and Stichting Woonstede to bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Stichting Woonlinie, Stichting Allee Wonen, Woningstichting Volksbelang, Stichting WoonInvest and Stichting Woonstede to bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of Belgium and Vereniging van Institutionele Beleggers in Vastgoed, Nederland (IVBN) to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of Belgium and Vereniging van Institutionele Beleggers in Vastgoed, Nederland (IVBN) to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 179, 3.7.2010.

1

---
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements of CenterPoint Properties Trust on Form S-3 (File Nos. 33-95792,
33-99858, 333-18235 and 333-49359), Form S-8/S-3 (File Nos. 333-05087 and
333-34687) and Form S-8 (File No. 333-05141 and 333-62887) of our report dated
February 9, 1999, except for Note 2A for which the date is November 15, 1999,
relating to the financial statements, which appears in the Annual Report to
Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A. We
also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated November 15,
1999 relating to the financial statement schedules which appears in this Form
10-K/A.

Chicago, Illinois                          PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
December 27, 1999
# C_2010328EN.01002402.xml

| 4.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/24

---

Action brought on 5 October 2010 — European Commission v Kingdom of Sweden

(Case C-480/10)

()

2010/C 328/41

Language of the case: Swedish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal and K. Simonsson, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Sweden

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Declare that, by in practice limiting the regime for value added tax (VAT) groups to providers of financial services and insurance services, the Kingdom of Sweden has failed to fulfil its obligations under Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, and |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that, by in practice limiting the regime for value added tax (VAT) groups to providers of financial services and insurance services, the Kingdom of Sweden has failed to fulfil its obligations under Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, and

| — | order the Kingdom of Sweden to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Kingdom of Sweden to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Swedish rules on VAT groups are contrary to Article 11 of the VAT Directive, since the application of the rules is limited to undertakings which are active within the financial sector. In the view of the Commission, national regimes for VAT groups must apply to all undertakings which are established in the Member State applying the arrangements, irrespective of the type of activity carried out by the undertaking.

The common system of VAT is a uniform system. Introduction of a special regime into that system must consequently, in principle, be done in such a way that the regime is generally applicable.

There is nothing in the wording of Article 11 of the VAT Directive to indicate that a Member State can limit the application of a regime for VAT groups to certain undertakings which are active within a certain sector.

The aim of Article 11 of the VAT Directive also tends to suggest that the provision is to be understood as applying to all undertakings in all sectors.

Furthermore, the Swedish rules on VAT groups are incompatible with the European Union law principle of equal treatment.

---
§ 93.303 Ports designated for the importation of horses. ( a ) *Air and ocean ports.* The following ports have APHIS inspection and quarantine facilities necessary for quarantine stations and all horses shall be entered into the United States through the following station(s), except as provided in paragraphs (b), (c), (d), (e), and (f) of this section, §§ 93.308(a), (b) and (c) and 93.317: Newburgh, New York.
( b ) *Canadian border ports.* Land border ports designated for the entry of horses from Canada may be found on the APHIS website at *www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/importexport/animal-import-and-export/equine .* Changes to the list of approved ports will be announced through notices published in the Federal Register.
( c ) *Mexican border ports.* Land border ports designated for the entry of horses from Mexico may be found on the APHIS website at *www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/importexport/animal-import-and-export/equine .* Changes to the list of approved ports will be announced through notices published in the Federal Register.
( d ) *Limited ports.* Certain ports are designated as having inspection facilities for the entry of horses and horse products such as horse test specimens which do not appear to require restraint and holding inspection facilities. These ports may be found on the APHIS website at *www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/importexport/animal-import-and-export/equine .* Changes to the list of approved ports will be announced through notices published in the Federal Register.
( e ) *Ports for horses to be quarantined at privately owned quarantine facilities.* Horses, except horses from or which have transited any region in which African horsesickness is declared to exist,[1] may be entered into the United States at any port specified in paragraph (a) of this section, or at any other port designated as an international port or airport by the U.S. Customs Service and quarantined at privately owned quarantine facilities provided that applicable provisions of §§ 93.301(c), 93.304(a), 93.306, 93.308(a), (b) and (c), and 93.314 are met. These ports may be found on the APHIS website at *www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/importexport/animal-import-and-export/equine .*
( f ) *Designation of other ports.* The Secretary of the Treasury has approved the designation as quarantine stations of the ports specified in this section. In special cases other ports may be designated as quarantine stations under this section by the Administrator, with the concurrence of the Secretary of the Treasury.
[55 FR 31495, Aug. 2, 1990. Redesignated at 62 FR 56012, Oct. 28, 1997] Editorial Note
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations affecting § 93.303, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*
Footnotes -
93.303
[1] Information as to the regions where African horsesickness is declared to exist may be obtained from the Administrator.